CA1166108A - Bone prosthesis with controlled stiffness - Google Patents
Bone prosthesis with controlled stiffnessInfo
- Publication number
- CA1166108A CA1166108A CA000390495A CA390495A CA1166108A CA 1166108 A CA1166108 A CA 1166108A CA 000390495 A CA000390495 A CA 000390495A CA 390495 A CA390495 A CA 390495A CA 1166108 A CA1166108 A CA 1166108A
- Authority
- CA
- Canada
- Prior art keywords
- bone
- prosthesis
- structural member
- plate
- fracture
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Expired
Links
Classifications
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B17/00—Surgical instruments, devices or methods, e.g. tourniquets
- A61B17/56—Surgical instruments or methods for treatment of bones or joints; Devices specially adapted therefor
- A61B17/58—Surgical instruments or methods for treatment of bones or joints; Devices specially adapted therefor for osteosynthesis, e.g. bone plates, screws, setting implements or the like
- A61B17/68—Internal fixation devices, including fasteners and spinal fixators, even if a part thereof projects from the skin
- A61B17/80—Cortical plates, i.e. bone plates; Instruments for holding or positioning cortical plates, or for compressing bones attached to cortical plates
- A61B17/8028—Cushions, i.e. elements forming interface between bone plate and bone
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B17/00—Surgical instruments, devices or methods, e.g. tourniquets
- A61B17/56—Surgical instruments or methods for treatment of bones or joints; Devices specially adapted therefor
- A61B17/58—Surgical instruments or methods for treatment of bones or joints; Devices specially adapted therefor for osteosynthesis, e.g. bone plates, screws, setting implements or the like
- A61B17/68—Internal fixation devices, including fasteners and spinal fixators, even if a part thereof projects from the skin
- A61B17/80—Cortical plates, i.e. bone plates; Instruments for holding or positioning cortical plates, or for compressing bones attached to cortical plates
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B17/00—Surgical instruments, devices or methods, e.g. tourniquets
- A61B17/56—Surgical instruments or methods for treatment of bones or joints; Devices specially adapted therefor
- A61B17/58—Surgical instruments or methods for treatment of bones or joints; Devices specially adapted therefor for osteosynthesis, e.g. bone plates, screws, setting implements or the like
- A61B17/68—Internal fixation devices, including fasteners and spinal fixators, even if a part thereof projects from the skin
- A61B17/80—Cortical plates, i.e. bone plates; Instruments for holding or positioning cortical plates, or for compressing bones attached to cortical plates
- A61B17/8033—Cortical plates, i.e. bone plates; Instruments for holding or positioning cortical plates, or for compressing bones attached to cortical plates having indirect contact with screw heads, or having contact with screw heads maintained with the aid of additional components, e.g. nuts, wedges or head covers
- A61B17/8047—Cortical plates, i.e. bone plates; Instruments for holding or positioning cortical plates, or for compressing bones attached to cortical plates having indirect contact with screw heads, or having contact with screw heads maintained with the aid of additional components, e.g. nuts, wedges or head covers wherein the additional element surrounds the screw head in the plate hole
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B17/00—Surgical instruments, devices or methods, e.g. tourniquets
- A61B2017/00004—(bio)absorbable, (bio)resorbable, resorptive
Abstract
PC(HO) 6348 BONE PROSTHESIS WITH CONTROLLED STIFFNESS
Abstract A novel bone prosthesis for use in healing a bone fracture is disclosed comprising a strong, rigid non-absorbable structural member and a biologically absorbable element held in use under compression against the structural member. Use of the novel prosthesis combines an excellent initial stabilization of the fixed fracture with a gradual shifting of stress-bearing from the prosthesis to the bone in the fracture region as the fracture heals. Thus, problems associated with stress-shielding during healing are alleviated. The structural member may be, e.q., a bone plate, intramedullary rod or hip nail.
Abstract A novel bone prosthesis for use in healing a bone fracture is disclosed comprising a strong, rigid non-absorbable structural member and a biologically absorbable element held in use under compression against the structural member. Use of the novel prosthesis combines an excellent initial stabilization of the fixed fracture with a gradual shifting of stress-bearing from the prosthesis to the bone in the fracture region as the fracture heals. Thus, problems associated with stress-shielding during healing are alleviated. The structural member may be, e.q., a bone plate, intramedullary rod or hip nail.
Description
PC(HO) 6348 BONE PROSTHESIS WITH CONTROLLED STIFFNESS
A wide variety of rigid metal prostheses, such as bone plates, intramedullary rods and fPmoral nails, aIe used in the fixation of bone fractures. A
potential problem associated with the use of rigid bone prostheses for fracture fixation is referred to in the art as stress-shielding. As bone remodeling takes place in the region of the fracture, stresses exerted on the healing bone are carried primarily by the prosthesis rather than by the bone in the fracture region. This stress-shielding can be the cause of significant bone resorption, with consequent reduction of strength of the bone in the region of the healed fracture. Shielding of bending stresses from bone undergoing remodeling is believed to be particularly deleterious~ See Bradley, G. W. et al., "Effects of Flexural Rigidity of Plates on Bone Healing", Jour. Bone and Joint Surg., Vol. 61-A, No. 6, pp. 866-872 (September 1979) and Woo, S. L-Y et al., "A Comparison of Cortical Bone Atrophy Secondary to Fixation with Plates with Large Differences in Bending Stiffness", Jour. Bone and Joint Surg., Vol. 58-A, No. 2, pp. 190-195 (March 1976).
The use of bone prostheses made of materials that are substantially less rigid than conventional surgical implant alloys has been proposed in order to alleviate problems arising from stress-shielding.
; One class of materials of reduced rigidity consists of non-absorbable syn~hetic polymers reinforced with inorganic fibers. However, the use of such materials sacrifices the excellent initial stabilization provided by a rigid prosthesis, which insures the maintenance of a proper alignment of bone segments during the early stages of healing.
U. S. Patent 2,987,062 discloses an orthopedic bone fracture clamp adapted to be wrapped around a fractured bone. The clamp comprises two metallic bands directly connected at one pair of ends and joined by a link of absorbable catgut at the other pair of ends. The assembly of bands and absorbable link is placed under tension so as to hold the fractured bone together.
After implantation of the assembly in the patient the link begins to be absorbed. Eventually the link fails and the clamping pressure on the bone is terminated, thereby, according to the patent, obviating the deleterious effects of continued pressure on the bone and eliminating the need for a second surgical operation to remove the clamp. However, the clamping pressure applied to the healing bone would not tend to decrease gradually or progressively with time after implantation.
Instead, it would tend to drop in one full step at the moment of failure of the link from near the initial clamping pressure to zero.
The use of a bone plate having a rigidity that gradually decreases with time after implantation has been proposed by Parsons, J. R. et al., "A Variable Stiffness, Ab~orbable Bone Plate", presented at the Fifth Annual Meeting of the Society for Biomaterials, Clemson, South Carolina, April 28-May 1, 1979. The bone plate proposed by Parsons et al. is made of a material consisting of continuous carbon fibers embedded in a resorbable J ~
matrix of polylactic acid polymer. However, the initial rigidity of this plate is only 20% to 50% that of conventional stainless steel bone plates, and the rigidity decreases by only 10% after six weeks of implantation. Also, the carbon fibers are dispersed throughout the tissue of the patient after absorption of the polylactic acid matrix.
A novel bone prosthesis for use in healing a bone fracture has now been invented comprising a strong, rigid, biologically non-absorbable structural member and a biologically absorbable element adapted to be held under compression against said structural member when said prosthesis is secured to said bone, so that stress is transmitted from said bone through said element to said structural member, whereby the stress transmitted to said prosthesis gradually decreases with time during the healing of said bone as said element is absorbed. The structural member is preferably made of metal, but may also be made of a ceramic, carbonaceous or other material. The biologically absorbable element is preferably made of a synthetic polymeric material, such as a hydroxy-methacrylate polymer, a polypeptide, polyglycolic acid, polylactic acid or a copolymer of polyglycolic acid and polylactic acid, but may also be made of, e.g., a ceramic material such as hydroxyapatite or tricalcium phosphate or a naturally-occurring polymeric material. The structural member of the novel prosthesis of the invention may be, e.g., a bone plate, intramedullary rod or hip nail. The effective overall rigidity of the prosthesis, as experienced by the healing bone, varies progressively with time after 3~
implantation, with stresses transmitted through the healing bone being gradually shifted from the prosthesis to the bone in the fracture region. The rate of decline of said effective rigidity as a function of time can be controlled by proper choice of the material (chemical composition, porosity, molecular weight, degree of crystallinity, monomeric ratio in copolymer, etc.) used for the biologically absorbable element.
A prosthesis of the invention may be designed in such a manner that its effective overall rigidity varies progressively after implantation from almost that of the rigid structural member to zero, with the probability of having to perform a subsequent surgical operation to remove the non-absorbable portion of the prosthesis being substantially lower than when said portion is implanted alone.
The invention will be described in detail with reference to certain preferred embodiments thereof. Reference to these embodiments does not limit the scope of the invention, which is limited only by the scope of the claims.
In the drawings:
FIG. 1 is a front sectional view of a first embodiment of the invention, a bone plate provided with a continuous biologically absorbable coating;
FIG. 2 is a front sectional view of a second embodiment of the invention, a bone plate provided with a plurality of biologically absorbable spacers;
- s -FIG. 3 is a front sectional view of a third embodiment of the invention, a bone plate provided with a plurality of biologically absorbable washers;
FIG. 4 is a front sectional view of a fourth embodiment of the invention, a bone plate provided with a plurality of biologically absorbable gaskets and non-absorbable sleeves;
FIG. 5 is a front sectional view of a fifth embodiment of the invention, an intramedullary rod provided with a continuous biologically absorbable coating; and FIG. 6 iS sectional view taken along line 6-6 of F:[G. 5.
FIG. 1 is a front sectional view of a first embodiment of the invention, bone prosthesis 1, secured to bone fragments 8 and 9 so as to effect the healing of a fracture between said bone fragments represented by fracture line F. Prosthesis 1 comprises a metallic structural member 2 and a biologically absorbable element 3. Structural member 2 is a conventional bone plate. Prosthesis 1 is secured to the bone by means of a plurality of conventional metallic bone screws 4 to 7 fitted through a plurality of circular apertures in member 2. Structural member 2 and bone screws 4 to 7 are made of a strong, rigid, biologically non-absorbable surgical implant alloy such as the cobalt-chromium-molybdenum alloy manufactured and sold under the trademark Vitallium (Howmedica, Inc.; ~ew York, New York) or 316L stainless steel.
i~t~ 8 Element 3 is a biologically absorbable continuoùs coating molded to the bottom face of member 2 and having the same length and width as said face. Element 3 is typically from about 0.1 mm. to about 1 mm. in thickness.
The absorbable coating is provided with a plurality of circular bone screw apertures coinciding with those in member 2. Element 3 is made of a synthetic polymeric material, preferably polyglycolic acid, polylactic acid or a polyglycolic acid:polylactic acid copolymer.
As can be seen in FIG. 1, element 3 is held under com-pression between structural member 2 and bone fragments 8 and 9 when prosthesis 1 is secured to said fragments by means of bone screws 4 to 7. The face of element 3 held adjacent to the bone fragments may be textured to allow for access of blood to the bone. Immediately after implantation, virtually all of the stresses transmitted between bone fragments 8 and 9 are trans-mitted through element 3 and carried by member 2, since they cannot be transmitted across the fracture line F.
The rigidity of prosthesis 1 experienced by the bone fragments immediately after fixation is almost that of a conventional rigid metallic bone plate.
As time passes after implantation, two phenomena occur simultaneously. First, the fracture between fragments ~5 8 and 9 begins to heal, thus reducing the need for stress-shielding. Second, element 3 is gradually absorbed by the bodily fluids and is thus gradually weakened. As these two phenomena occur, the pathway of stress trans-mission between bone fragments 8 and 9 is gradually shifted so that with passing time progressively more stress is transmitted directly through the healing bone in the region of original fracture line F and , progressively less stress is transmitted through prosthesis 1. Finally, as the absorption of element 3 nears completion, virtually all of the stresses are carried by the healed bone itself; the probability of having to perform a subsequent surgical operation to remove the non-absorbable portion of the prosthesis is substantially lower than when said portion is implanted by itself without element 3.
Alternate designs for biologically absorbable elements for use with structural member 2 and screws 4 to 7 are shown in FIGS. 2, 3 and 4. In FIG. 2, the continuous coating 3 of FIG. 1 has been replaced by a plurality of discrete, generally rectangular biologically absorbable spacers 11 to 13 molded to the bottom face of structural member 2. The width of said spacers, i.e. the dimension extending perpendicularly to the plane of FIG. 2, is the same as the width of the bottom face of member 2. In FIG. 3, the continuous coating 3 of FIG. 1 has been replaced by a plurality of biologically absorbable washers 21 to 24 for screws 4 to 7. Washers 21 to 24 are not molded to structural member 2, and are separable therefrom when the pros-thesis of FIG. 3 is not in use. In FIG. 4, the con-tinuous coating 3 of FIG. 1 has been replaced by a plurality of biologically absorbable gaskets 31 to 34 for screws 4 to 7. Additionally, the prosthesis con-tains a plurality of non-absorbable polymeric, e.g.
polyethylene, sleeves 41 to 44 located within the bone screw apertures of structural member 2 to prevent fretting of bone screws 4 to 7 against member 2.
Gaskets 31 to 34 and sleeves 41 to 44 are separable from member 2 when the prosthesis of FIG. 4 is not in use.
`8 FIG. 5 is a front sectional view of a fifth embodiment of the invention, bone prosthesis 101, which has been driven into the medullary canal 110 of a fractured bone so as to effect the healing of a fracture, represented by fracture line L, between bone fragments 108 and 109. Prosthesis 101 comprises a metallic structural member 102, which is a conventional intra-medullary rod, and a biologically absorbable element 103, which is a continuous coating molded to the exterior surface of member 102. As can be seen in FIG. 6, both member 102 and element 103 are circular in transverse cross-section, subtending an angle of about 270. Structural member 102 is made of a strong, rigid, biologically non-absorbable surgical implant alloy such as the cobalt-chromium-molybdenum alloy manufactured and sold under the trademark Vitallium ~owmedica, Inc.; New York, New York). Element 103 is made of a synthetic polymeric material, preferably poly-glycolic acid, polylactic acid or a polyglycolic acid:polylactic acid copolymer. As can be seen in FIGS.
5 and 6, element 103 is held under compression between structural member 102 and bone fragments 108 and 109 when prosthesis 101 is driven into the medullary canal of the fractured bone. As bone healing and absorption of element 103 occur simultaneously after implantation, stress t~ansmission is gradually shifted from prosthesis 101 to the bone in the region of original fracture line in an analogous manner as described above with regard to the prostheses of FI~S. 1 to 4. Again, the probability of having to perform a subsequent surgical operation to remove structural member 102 is substantially reduced.
A wide variety of rigid metal prostheses, such as bone plates, intramedullary rods and fPmoral nails, aIe used in the fixation of bone fractures. A
potential problem associated with the use of rigid bone prostheses for fracture fixation is referred to in the art as stress-shielding. As bone remodeling takes place in the region of the fracture, stresses exerted on the healing bone are carried primarily by the prosthesis rather than by the bone in the fracture region. This stress-shielding can be the cause of significant bone resorption, with consequent reduction of strength of the bone in the region of the healed fracture. Shielding of bending stresses from bone undergoing remodeling is believed to be particularly deleterious~ See Bradley, G. W. et al., "Effects of Flexural Rigidity of Plates on Bone Healing", Jour. Bone and Joint Surg., Vol. 61-A, No. 6, pp. 866-872 (September 1979) and Woo, S. L-Y et al., "A Comparison of Cortical Bone Atrophy Secondary to Fixation with Plates with Large Differences in Bending Stiffness", Jour. Bone and Joint Surg., Vol. 58-A, No. 2, pp. 190-195 (March 1976).
The use of bone prostheses made of materials that are substantially less rigid than conventional surgical implant alloys has been proposed in order to alleviate problems arising from stress-shielding.
; One class of materials of reduced rigidity consists of non-absorbable syn~hetic polymers reinforced with inorganic fibers. However, the use of such materials sacrifices the excellent initial stabilization provided by a rigid prosthesis, which insures the maintenance of a proper alignment of bone segments during the early stages of healing.
U. S. Patent 2,987,062 discloses an orthopedic bone fracture clamp adapted to be wrapped around a fractured bone. The clamp comprises two metallic bands directly connected at one pair of ends and joined by a link of absorbable catgut at the other pair of ends. The assembly of bands and absorbable link is placed under tension so as to hold the fractured bone together.
After implantation of the assembly in the patient the link begins to be absorbed. Eventually the link fails and the clamping pressure on the bone is terminated, thereby, according to the patent, obviating the deleterious effects of continued pressure on the bone and eliminating the need for a second surgical operation to remove the clamp. However, the clamping pressure applied to the healing bone would not tend to decrease gradually or progressively with time after implantation.
Instead, it would tend to drop in one full step at the moment of failure of the link from near the initial clamping pressure to zero.
The use of a bone plate having a rigidity that gradually decreases with time after implantation has been proposed by Parsons, J. R. et al., "A Variable Stiffness, Ab~orbable Bone Plate", presented at the Fifth Annual Meeting of the Society for Biomaterials, Clemson, South Carolina, April 28-May 1, 1979. The bone plate proposed by Parsons et al. is made of a material consisting of continuous carbon fibers embedded in a resorbable J ~
matrix of polylactic acid polymer. However, the initial rigidity of this plate is only 20% to 50% that of conventional stainless steel bone plates, and the rigidity decreases by only 10% after six weeks of implantation. Also, the carbon fibers are dispersed throughout the tissue of the patient after absorption of the polylactic acid matrix.
A novel bone prosthesis for use in healing a bone fracture has now been invented comprising a strong, rigid, biologically non-absorbable structural member and a biologically absorbable element adapted to be held under compression against said structural member when said prosthesis is secured to said bone, so that stress is transmitted from said bone through said element to said structural member, whereby the stress transmitted to said prosthesis gradually decreases with time during the healing of said bone as said element is absorbed. The structural member is preferably made of metal, but may also be made of a ceramic, carbonaceous or other material. The biologically absorbable element is preferably made of a synthetic polymeric material, such as a hydroxy-methacrylate polymer, a polypeptide, polyglycolic acid, polylactic acid or a copolymer of polyglycolic acid and polylactic acid, but may also be made of, e.g., a ceramic material such as hydroxyapatite or tricalcium phosphate or a naturally-occurring polymeric material. The structural member of the novel prosthesis of the invention may be, e.g., a bone plate, intramedullary rod or hip nail. The effective overall rigidity of the prosthesis, as experienced by the healing bone, varies progressively with time after 3~
implantation, with stresses transmitted through the healing bone being gradually shifted from the prosthesis to the bone in the fracture region. The rate of decline of said effective rigidity as a function of time can be controlled by proper choice of the material (chemical composition, porosity, molecular weight, degree of crystallinity, monomeric ratio in copolymer, etc.) used for the biologically absorbable element.
A prosthesis of the invention may be designed in such a manner that its effective overall rigidity varies progressively after implantation from almost that of the rigid structural member to zero, with the probability of having to perform a subsequent surgical operation to remove the non-absorbable portion of the prosthesis being substantially lower than when said portion is implanted alone.
The invention will be described in detail with reference to certain preferred embodiments thereof. Reference to these embodiments does not limit the scope of the invention, which is limited only by the scope of the claims.
In the drawings:
FIG. 1 is a front sectional view of a first embodiment of the invention, a bone plate provided with a continuous biologically absorbable coating;
FIG. 2 is a front sectional view of a second embodiment of the invention, a bone plate provided with a plurality of biologically absorbable spacers;
- s -FIG. 3 is a front sectional view of a third embodiment of the invention, a bone plate provided with a plurality of biologically absorbable washers;
FIG. 4 is a front sectional view of a fourth embodiment of the invention, a bone plate provided with a plurality of biologically absorbable gaskets and non-absorbable sleeves;
FIG. 5 is a front sectional view of a fifth embodiment of the invention, an intramedullary rod provided with a continuous biologically absorbable coating; and FIG. 6 iS sectional view taken along line 6-6 of F:[G. 5.
FIG. 1 is a front sectional view of a first embodiment of the invention, bone prosthesis 1, secured to bone fragments 8 and 9 so as to effect the healing of a fracture between said bone fragments represented by fracture line F. Prosthesis 1 comprises a metallic structural member 2 and a biologically absorbable element 3. Structural member 2 is a conventional bone plate. Prosthesis 1 is secured to the bone by means of a plurality of conventional metallic bone screws 4 to 7 fitted through a plurality of circular apertures in member 2. Structural member 2 and bone screws 4 to 7 are made of a strong, rigid, biologically non-absorbable surgical implant alloy such as the cobalt-chromium-molybdenum alloy manufactured and sold under the trademark Vitallium (Howmedica, Inc.; ~ew York, New York) or 316L stainless steel.
i~t~ 8 Element 3 is a biologically absorbable continuoùs coating molded to the bottom face of member 2 and having the same length and width as said face. Element 3 is typically from about 0.1 mm. to about 1 mm. in thickness.
The absorbable coating is provided with a plurality of circular bone screw apertures coinciding with those in member 2. Element 3 is made of a synthetic polymeric material, preferably polyglycolic acid, polylactic acid or a polyglycolic acid:polylactic acid copolymer.
As can be seen in FIG. 1, element 3 is held under com-pression between structural member 2 and bone fragments 8 and 9 when prosthesis 1 is secured to said fragments by means of bone screws 4 to 7. The face of element 3 held adjacent to the bone fragments may be textured to allow for access of blood to the bone. Immediately after implantation, virtually all of the stresses transmitted between bone fragments 8 and 9 are trans-mitted through element 3 and carried by member 2, since they cannot be transmitted across the fracture line F.
The rigidity of prosthesis 1 experienced by the bone fragments immediately after fixation is almost that of a conventional rigid metallic bone plate.
As time passes after implantation, two phenomena occur simultaneously. First, the fracture between fragments ~5 8 and 9 begins to heal, thus reducing the need for stress-shielding. Second, element 3 is gradually absorbed by the bodily fluids and is thus gradually weakened. As these two phenomena occur, the pathway of stress trans-mission between bone fragments 8 and 9 is gradually shifted so that with passing time progressively more stress is transmitted directly through the healing bone in the region of original fracture line F and , progressively less stress is transmitted through prosthesis 1. Finally, as the absorption of element 3 nears completion, virtually all of the stresses are carried by the healed bone itself; the probability of having to perform a subsequent surgical operation to remove the non-absorbable portion of the prosthesis is substantially lower than when said portion is implanted by itself without element 3.
Alternate designs for biologically absorbable elements for use with structural member 2 and screws 4 to 7 are shown in FIGS. 2, 3 and 4. In FIG. 2, the continuous coating 3 of FIG. 1 has been replaced by a plurality of discrete, generally rectangular biologically absorbable spacers 11 to 13 molded to the bottom face of structural member 2. The width of said spacers, i.e. the dimension extending perpendicularly to the plane of FIG. 2, is the same as the width of the bottom face of member 2. In FIG. 3, the continuous coating 3 of FIG. 1 has been replaced by a plurality of biologically absorbable washers 21 to 24 for screws 4 to 7. Washers 21 to 24 are not molded to structural member 2, and are separable therefrom when the pros-thesis of FIG. 3 is not in use. In FIG. 4, the con-tinuous coating 3 of FIG. 1 has been replaced by a plurality of biologically absorbable gaskets 31 to 34 for screws 4 to 7. Additionally, the prosthesis con-tains a plurality of non-absorbable polymeric, e.g.
polyethylene, sleeves 41 to 44 located within the bone screw apertures of structural member 2 to prevent fretting of bone screws 4 to 7 against member 2.
Gaskets 31 to 34 and sleeves 41 to 44 are separable from member 2 when the prosthesis of FIG. 4 is not in use.
`8 FIG. 5 is a front sectional view of a fifth embodiment of the invention, bone prosthesis 101, which has been driven into the medullary canal 110 of a fractured bone so as to effect the healing of a fracture, represented by fracture line L, between bone fragments 108 and 109. Prosthesis 101 comprises a metallic structural member 102, which is a conventional intra-medullary rod, and a biologically absorbable element 103, which is a continuous coating molded to the exterior surface of member 102. As can be seen in FIG. 6, both member 102 and element 103 are circular in transverse cross-section, subtending an angle of about 270. Structural member 102 is made of a strong, rigid, biologically non-absorbable surgical implant alloy such as the cobalt-chromium-molybdenum alloy manufactured and sold under the trademark Vitallium ~owmedica, Inc.; New York, New York). Element 103 is made of a synthetic polymeric material, preferably poly-glycolic acid, polylactic acid or a polyglycolic acid:polylactic acid copolymer. As can be seen in FIGS.
5 and 6, element 103 is held under compression between structural member 102 and bone fragments 108 and 109 when prosthesis 101 is driven into the medullary canal of the fractured bone. As bone healing and absorption of element 103 occur simultaneously after implantation, stress t~ansmission is gradually shifted from prosthesis 101 to the bone in the region of original fracture line in an analogous manner as described above with regard to the prostheses of FI~S. 1 to 4. Again, the probability of having to perform a subsequent surgical operation to remove structural member 102 is substantially reduced.
Claims (9)
1. A bone prosthesis for use in healing a bone fracture comprising a strong, rigid, biologically non-absorbable structural member and a biologically absorbable element adapted to be held under compression against said structural member when said prosthesis is secured to said bone, so that stress is transmitted from said bone through said element to said structural member, whereby the stress transmitted to said prosthesis gradually decreases with time during the healing of said bone as said element is absorbed.
2. A prosthesis of claim 1 wherein said element is adapted to be held between said structural member and said bone when said prosthesis is secured to said bone.
3. A prosthesis of claim 2 wherein said structural member is a bone plate and said element is affixed to said plate.
4. A prosthesis of claim 2 wherein said structural member is an intramedullary rod and said element is affixed to the exterior of said rod.
5. A prosthesis of claim 1 wherein said structural member is a bone plate adapted to be secured to said bone by means including a bone screw fitted through an aperture in said plate, and said element is a gasket held between said screw and said plate.
6. A prosthesis of claim 2 wherein said structural member is a bone plate adapted to be secured to said bone by means including a bone screw adapted to be fitted through an aperture in said plate, and said element is a washer for said screw held between said plate and said bone.
7. A prosthesis of claim 1 wherein said structural member is made of metal.
8. A prosthesis of claim 1 wherein said element is made of a polymeric material.
9. A prosthesis of claim 8 wherein said element is made of a synthetic polymeric material.
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US06/208,906 US4338926A (en) | 1980-11-21 | 1980-11-21 | Bone fracture prosthesis with controlled stiffness |
US208,906 | 1980-11-21 |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
CA1166108A true CA1166108A (en) | 1984-04-24 |
Family
ID=22776540
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
CA000390495A Expired CA1166108A (en) | 1980-11-21 | 1981-11-20 | Bone prosthesis with controlled stiffness |
Country Status (5)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (1) | US4338926A (en) |
EP (1) | EP0052998B1 (en) |
JP (1) | JPS57117852A (en) |
CA (1) | CA1166108A (en) |
DE (1) | DE3165445D1 (en) |
Families Citing this family (138)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US4573458A (en) * | 1982-08-17 | 1986-03-04 | Zimmer, Inc. | Bone fixation plate |
FI69402C (en) * | 1983-09-20 | 1986-02-10 | Materials Consultants Oy | OSTEOSYNTESANORDNING |
GB8400932D0 (en) * | 1984-01-13 | 1984-02-15 | Geistlich Soehne Ag | Bone fracture fixation plates |
US4863475A (en) * | 1984-08-31 | 1989-09-05 | Zimmer, Inc. | Implant and method for production thereof |
DE3442004C1 (en) * | 1984-11-16 | 1986-04-24 | Otte, Heinz, Dr.med., 8712 Volkach | Bone fixation apparatus for the treatment of fractures |
GB8515870D0 (en) * | 1985-06-22 | 1985-07-24 | Showell A W Sugicraft Ltd | Bone fixation plates |
US5013315A (en) * | 1985-07-12 | 1991-05-07 | Minnesota Mining And Manufacturing Company | Semiabsorbable bone plate spacer |
US4973333A (en) * | 1985-09-20 | 1990-11-27 | Richards Medical Company | Resorbable compressing screw and method |
US4776329A (en) * | 1985-09-20 | 1988-10-11 | Richards Medical Company | Resorbable compressing screw and method |
US4693720A (en) * | 1985-09-23 | 1987-09-15 | Katecho, Incorporated | Device for surgically repairing soft tissues and method for making the same |
FR2596978A1 (en) * | 1986-04-10 | 1987-10-16 | Peters | BONE FIXING PLATE, PROVIDED WITH SUTURE WIRES |
US4832686A (en) * | 1986-06-24 | 1989-05-23 | Anderson Mark E | Method for administering interleukin-2 |
US4781183A (en) * | 1986-08-27 | 1988-11-01 | American Cyanamid Company | Surgical prosthesis |
NZ222159A (en) * | 1986-10-27 | 1989-12-21 | Johnson & Johnson Prod Inc | Absorbable bone plate |
EP0270704B1 (en) * | 1986-12-12 | 1989-04-26 | Aesculap Ag | Anchoring element for fastening an osteosynthesis plate to a bone |
SU1651778A3 (en) * | 1986-12-19 | 1991-05-23 | Хута Баильдон, Пшедсембиорство Паньствове (Инопредприятие) | Appliance for ostheosynthesis of fractures of the femoral neck |
US4756307A (en) * | 1987-02-09 | 1988-07-12 | Zimmer, Inc. | Nail device |
US4774933A (en) * | 1987-05-18 | 1988-10-04 | Xomed, Inc. | Method and apparatus for implanting hearing device |
JP2564183B2 (en) * | 1987-11-03 | 1996-12-18 | ジンテーズ アクチエンゲゼルシャフト | Bone graft |
DE3805303C1 (en) * | 1988-02-20 | 1989-06-01 | Medi-System Gmbh, 4400 Muenster, De | |
DE3838774A1 (en) * | 1988-11-11 | 1990-05-17 | Mecron Med Prod Gmbh | SLIDING PLATE |
DE3841288A1 (en) * | 1988-12-08 | 1990-06-13 | Pertti Prof Dr Toermaelae | OSTEOSYNTHESE IMPLANTS |
FI82805C (en) * | 1988-12-23 | 1991-04-25 | Biocon Oy | EN POLYMER FIXERINGSKIVKONSTRUKTION FOER KIRURGISKT BRUK. |
US5474553A (en) * | 1989-04-18 | 1995-12-12 | Rainer Baumgart | System for setting tubular bone fractures |
CA1317173C (en) * | 1989-11-08 | 1993-05-04 | Amnon Foux | Plate for broken bone fixation |
AU1443692A (en) * | 1991-02-20 | 1992-09-15 | Danek Medical, Inc. | Improved external fixation frame assembly |
EP0523926A3 (en) * | 1991-07-15 | 1993-12-01 | Smith & Nephew Richards Inc | Prosthetic implants with bioabsorbable coating |
US5201733A (en) * | 1992-01-21 | 1993-04-13 | Etheredge Iii James L | Method and apparatus for internal fixation of fractures |
DE4205118C1 (en) * | 1992-02-13 | 1993-07-29 | Dietmar Dr.Med. Priv. Doz. 5000 Koeln De Pennig | |
FR2688139B1 (en) * | 1992-03-06 | 1995-06-23 | Zimmer Sa | NEW COATING FOR PROSTHETIC SYSTEM. |
WO1993021847A1 (en) * | 1992-04-29 | 1993-11-11 | Danek Medical, Inc. | Positionable spinal fixation device |
US5599290A (en) * | 1992-11-20 | 1997-02-04 | Beth Israel Hospital | Bone fracture prevention garment and method |
DE4414675C1 (en) * | 1994-04-27 | 1995-09-28 | Kirsch Axel | Covering device for bone defects and method for their production |
US5529736A (en) * | 1994-08-10 | 1996-06-25 | Clemson University | Process of making a bone healing device |
US6206881B1 (en) * | 1995-09-06 | 2001-03-27 | Synthes (Usa) | Bone plate |
CA2158890C (en) * | 1995-09-22 | 2002-01-22 | John Runciman | Spherical washer for use with a bone screw |
ES2238736T3 (en) * | 1996-12-03 | 2005-09-01 | Osteobiologics, Inc. | BIODEGRADABLE POLYMER FILM. |
US6004323A (en) * | 1997-02-04 | 1999-12-21 | The University Of Iowa Research Foundation | Surgically implantable fastening system |
US6139550A (en) * | 1997-02-11 | 2000-10-31 | Michelson; Gary K. | Skeletal plating system |
EP1402835B1 (en) * | 1997-02-11 | 2011-09-28 | Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc. | Single-lock anterior cervical plating system |
ES2268267T3 (en) * | 1997-02-11 | 2007-03-16 | Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc. | PREVIOUS CERVICAL PLATE FOR UNIQUE TYPE LOCK DEVICE. |
US5810821A (en) * | 1997-03-28 | 1998-09-22 | Biomet Inc. | Bone fixation screw system |
US5951557A (en) * | 1997-12-30 | 1999-09-14 | Luter; Dennis W. | Bone plate |
US6063117A (en) * | 1998-01-22 | 2000-05-16 | Perry; Arthur C. | Porous orbital implant structure |
SI1112095T1 (en) * | 1998-09-11 | 2003-04-30 | Gerhard Dr. Schmidmaier | Biologically active implants |
US6350284B1 (en) * | 1998-09-14 | 2002-02-26 | Bionx Implants, Oy | Bioabsorbable, layered composite material for guided bone tissue regeneration |
US6296645B1 (en) | 1999-04-09 | 2001-10-02 | Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. | Intramedullary nail with non-metal spacers |
US6783529B2 (en) | 1999-04-09 | 2004-08-31 | Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. | Non-metal inserts for bone support assembly |
US6187008B1 (en) | 1999-07-07 | 2001-02-13 | Bristol-Myers Squibb | Device for temporarily fixing bones |
AU7118100A (en) * | 1999-09-03 | 2001-04-10 | Daniel J. Cook | Temporary spine fixation device and method |
EP1211993B1 (en) * | 1999-09-14 | 2005-10-26 | Dietmar Prof. Dr. Wolter | Fixation system for bones |
US6540746B1 (en) * | 1999-09-30 | 2003-04-01 | Sulzer Orthopedics Ltd. | Bone plate for splinting a fracture at a bone with a plurality of bone screws |
MXPA02007226A (en) * | 2000-01-27 | 2002-12-09 | Synthes Ag | Bone plate. |
US6808527B2 (en) | 2000-04-10 | 2004-10-26 | Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. | Intramedullary nail with snap-in window insert |
US6527775B1 (en) | 2000-09-22 | 2003-03-04 | Piper Medical, Inc. | Intramedullary interlocking fixation device for the distal radius |
US6666868B2 (en) | 2001-03-02 | 2003-12-23 | Medicinelodge, Inc. | Two-part orthopedic fastener |
US7122037B2 (en) * | 2001-05-17 | 2006-10-17 | Inion Ltd. | Bone fracture fastener and material for production thereof |
AU2001258138B2 (en) | 2001-05-28 | 2004-10-28 | Synthes Gmbh | Bone plate for the fixation of fractures of the proximal humerus |
US6692507B2 (en) * | 2001-08-23 | 2004-02-17 | Scimed Life Systems, Inc. | Impermanent biocompatible fastener |
US6749639B2 (en) | 2001-08-27 | 2004-06-15 | Mayo Foundation For Medical Education And Research | Coated prosthetic implant |
US20060142765A9 (en) * | 2001-10-15 | 2006-06-29 | Dixon Robert A | Vertebral implant for bone fixation or interbody use |
FR2845588B1 (en) * | 2002-10-09 | 2006-12-15 | Biotech Internat | SELF-LOCKING OSTEOSYNTHESIS DEVICE |
DE20300987U1 (en) * | 2003-01-23 | 2003-04-10 | Stryker Trauma Gmbh | Implant for osteosynthesis |
US7951176B2 (en) | 2003-05-30 | 2011-05-31 | Synthes Usa, Llc | Bone plate |
DE20321552U1 (en) | 2003-08-26 | 2007-12-27 | Synthes Gmbh | bone plate |
US11259851B2 (en) | 2003-08-26 | 2022-03-01 | DePuy Synthes Products, Inc. | Bone plate |
JP2007506452A (en) * | 2003-09-08 | 2007-03-22 | ジンテーズ アクチエンゲゼルシャフト クール | Bone fixation device |
US8979900B2 (en) | 2003-09-24 | 2015-03-17 | DePuy Synthes Products, LLC | Spinal stabilization device |
US7137985B2 (en) | 2003-09-24 | 2006-11-21 | N Spine, Inc. | Marking and guidance method and system for flexible fixation of a spine |
US8105367B2 (en) | 2003-09-29 | 2012-01-31 | Smith & Nephew, Inc. | Bone plate and bone plate assemblies including polyaxial fasteners |
US20050085814A1 (en) * | 2003-10-21 | 2005-04-21 | Sherman Michael C. | Dynamizable orthopedic implants and their use in treating bone defects |
US7699879B2 (en) * | 2003-10-21 | 2010-04-20 | Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc. | Apparatus and method for providing dynamizable translations to orthopedic implants |
ES2322575T3 (en) * | 2003-10-30 | 2009-06-23 | Synthes Gmbh | OSTEOSYNTHESIS PLATE. |
ATE540628T1 (en) * | 2003-12-01 | 2012-01-15 | Smith & Nephew Inc | HUMERAL NAIL WITH INSERT FOR FIXING A SCREW |
US20050209603A1 (en) | 2003-12-02 | 2005-09-22 | St. Francis Medical Technologies, Inc. | Method for remediation of intervertebral disks |
US20050136764A1 (en) * | 2003-12-18 | 2005-06-23 | Sherman Michael C. | Designed composite degradation for spinal implants |
US11291484B2 (en) | 2004-01-26 | 2022-04-05 | DePuy Synthes Products, Inc. | Highly-versatile variable-angle bone plate system |
US7637928B2 (en) * | 2004-01-26 | 2009-12-29 | Synthes Usa, Llc | Variable angle locked bone fixation system |
US8574268B2 (en) * | 2004-01-26 | 2013-11-05 | DePuy Synthes Product, LLC | Highly-versatile variable-angle bone plate system |
US7468069B2 (en) | 2004-02-10 | 2008-12-23 | Atlas Spine, Inc. | Static anterior cervical plate |
US7485133B2 (en) * | 2004-07-14 | 2009-02-03 | Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc. | Force diffusion spinal hook |
US7588577B2 (en) | 2004-07-15 | 2009-09-15 | Wright Medical Technology, Inc. | Guide assembly for intramedullary fixation and method of using the same |
US20060015101A1 (en) | 2004-07-15 | 2006-01-19 | Wright Medical Technology, Inc. | Intramedullary fixation assembly and devices and methods for installing the same |
US7288095B2 (en) | 2004-08-12 | 2007-10-30 | Atlas Spine, Inc. | Bone plate with screw lock |
WO2006032362A2 (en) * | 2004-09-17 | 2006-03-30 | Michael Buhr | Partially resorbable osteosynthetic products |
WO2006069089A2 (en) | 2004-12-21 | 2006-06-29 | Packaging Service Corporation Of Kentucky | Cervical plate system |
US7322984B2 (en) | 2005-01-06 | 2008-01-29 | Spinal, Llc | Spinal plate with internal screw locks |
US7438715B2 (en) * | 2005-01-06 | 2008-10-21 | Spinal Llc | Spinal implant kit |
US7410488B2 (en) | 2005-02-18 | 2008-08-12 | Smith & Nephew, Inc. | Hindfoot nail |
US20060242813A1 (en) * | 2005-04-29 | 2006-11-02 | Fred Molz | Metal injection molding of spinal fixation systems components |
US20060271048A1 (en) * | 2005-05-12 | 2006-11-30 | Jeffery Thramann | Pedicle screw based vertebral body stabilization apparatus |
US7828830B2 (en) * | 2005-05-12 | 2010-11-09 | Lanx, Inc. | Dynamic spinal stabilization |
US9060820B2 (en) | 2005-05-18 | 2015-06-23 | Sonoma Orthopedic Products, Inc. | Segmented intramedullary fracture fixation devices and methods |
US8961516B2 (en) | 2005-05-18 | 2015-02-24 | Sonoma Orthopedic Products, Inc. | Straight intramedullary fracture fixation devices and methods |
US7909825B2 (en) | 2006-11-22 | 2011-03-22 | Sonoma Orthepedic Products, Inc. | Fracture fixation device, tools and methods |
US20060264951A1 (en) | 2005-05-18 | 2006-11-23 | Nelson Charles L | Minimally Invasive Actuable Bone Fixation Devices Having a Retractable Interdigitation Process |
US8287539B2 (en) | 2005-05-18 | 2012-10-16 | Sonoma Orthopedic Products, Inc. | Fracture fixation device, tools and methods |
GB0513647D0 (en) * | 2005-07-02 | 2005-08-10 | Greater Glasgow Health Board S | Supra mucosal bone fixation |
US8382807B2 (en) | 2005-07-25 | 2013-02-26 | Smith & Nephew, Inc. | Systems and methods for using polyaxial plates |
JP5270339B2 (en) | 2005-07-25 | 2013-08-21 | スミス アンド ネフュー インコーポレーテッド | System and method for using a multi-axis plate |
US20070191848A1 (en) * | 2006-02-01 | 2007-08-16 | Zimmer Technology, Inc. | Hydrogel bone plate spacer |
EP2010104B1 (en) * | 2006-04-25 | 2018-09-05 | Teleflex Medical Incorporated | Calcium phosphate polymer composite and method |
US8309521B2 (en) * | 2007-06-19 | 2012-11-13 | Zimmer, Inc. | Spacer with a coating thereon for use with an implant device |
US20090082816A1 (en) * | 2007-09-20 | 2009-03-26 | Graham Matthew R | Remodelable orthopaedic spacer and method of using the same |
US20090130620A1 (en) * | 2007-11-19 | 2009-05-21 | Mohamadreza Yazdi | Bone supported palatal expansion appliance |
US8771283B2 (en) | 2007-12-17 | 2014-07-08 | Wright Medical Technology, Inc. | Guide assembly for intramedullary fixation and method of using the same |
CA2738478A1 (en) | 2008-09-26 | 2010-04-01 | Sonoma Orthopedic Products, Inc. | Bone fixation device, tools and methods |
BRPI0920250A2 (en) | 2008-10-15 | 2016-11-22 | Smith & Nephew Inc | composite internal fasteners |
US8246664B2 (en) * | 2009-02-24 | 2012-08-21 | Osteomed Llc | Multiple bone fusion plate |
CA2794019C (en) | 2009-03-24 | 2019-09-10 | Stabiliz Orthopedics, LLC | Orthopedic fixation device with bioresorbable layer |
US8529608B2 (en) | 2009-04-28 | 2013-09-10 | Osteomed Llc | Bone plate with a transfixation screw hole |
US8652183B1 (en) | 2009-07-07 | 2014-02-18 | Mari S Truman | Multi-angle orthopedic expansion head fastener |
DK2453939T3 (en) * | 2009-07-16 | 2014-02-03 | Anatoli D Dosta | bone implants |
US8758346B2 (en) * | 2009-09-14 | 2014-06-24 | DePuy Synthes Products, LLC | Variable angle compression plate |
CN103717179B (en) | 2011-06-15 | 2017-08-08 | 史密夫和内修有限公司 | Variable angle locked implant |
DE102012006454A1 (en) * | 2012-03-30 | 2013-10-02 | Heraeus Medical Gmbh | Anti-infective spacer for osteosynthesis plates |
FR2994380B1 (en) * | 2012-08-13 | 2015-07-17 | Biotech Ortho | COATING PLATE OF BONE FRAGMENTS AND METHODS OF MAKING SUCH PLATE. |
EP3323364A1 (en) * | 2013-04-12 | 2018-05-23 | Zimmer GmbH | Orthopedic plate |
CN103654928A (en) * | 2013-12-10 | 2014-03-26 | 徐斌 | Self-releasing-type internal fracture fixation system |
US9770278B2 (en) | 2014-01-17 | 2017-09-26 | Arthrex, Inc. | Dual tip guide wire |
US20150265325A1 (en) * | 2014-03-24 | 2015-09-24 | Robert G Matheny | Sternal Closure Apparatus, System and Method |
CN103961168A (en) * | 2014-05-14 | 2014-08-06 | 徐斌 | Reinforcing bar for supporting pore passage of bone nail |
US9814499B2 (en) | 2014-09-30 | 2017-11-14 | Arthrex, Inc. | Intramedullary fracture fixation devices and methods |
CH710695B1 (en) | 2015-02-03 | 2022-11-30 | Brianza Stefano | Device for variable fixation of bone fragments. |
US11707306B2 (en) * | 2015-06-09 | 2023-07-25 | Cheng Xin She | Fixing bone plate |
WO2017048909A1 (en) | 2015-09-18 | 2017-03-23 | Smith & Nephew, Inc. | Bone plate |
US10905476B2 (en) | 2016-09-08 | 2021-02-02 | DePuy Synthes Products, Inc. | Variable angle bone plate |
US10624686B2 (en) | 2016-09-08 | 2020-04-21 | DePuy Synthes Products, Inc. | Variable angel bone plate |
US10820930B2 (en) | 2016-09-08 | 2020-11-03 | DePuy Synthes Products, Inc. | Variable angle bone plate |
US11426220B2 (en) | 2017-10-11 | 2022-08-30 | Howmedica Osteonics Corp. | Humeral fixation plate guides |
WO2019136122A1 (en) | 2018-01-03 | 2019-07-11 | Lee Thomas Hoon | Hybrid cannulated orthopedic screws |
WO2019140438A1 (en) | 2018-01-15 | 2019-07-18 | Sands Steven Saam | Hybrid intramedullary rods |
US11026727B2 (en) | 2018-03-20 | 2021-06-08 | DePuy Synthes Products, Inc. | Bone plate with form-fitting variable-angle locking hole |
US10772665B2 (en) | 2018-03-29 | 2020-09-15 | DePuy Synthes Products, Inc. | Locking structures for affixing bone anchors to a bone plate, and related systems and methods |
US11013541B2 (en) | 2018-04-30 | 2021-05-25 | DePuy Synthes Products, Inc. | Threaded locking structures for affixing bone anchors to a bone plate, and related systems and methods |
US11701150B2 (en) * | 2018-08-24 | 2023-07-18 | Laboratoires Bodycad Inc. | Patient-specific fixation plate with spacing elements |
US10925651B2 (en) | 2018-12-21 | 2021-02-23 | DePuy Synthes Products, Inc. | Implant having locking holes with collection cavity for shavings |
EP3941373A1 (en) | 2019-03-18 | 2022-01-26 | GLW, Inc. | Hybrid bone plate |
Family Cites Families (18)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US2136471A (en) * | 1937-06-30 | 1938-11-15 | Rudolph H Schneider | Bone pin |
US2987062A (en) * | 1956-07-23 | 1961-06-06 | Arthur E Ellison | Bone splint with absorbable section |
US3739773A (en) * | 1963-10-31 | 1973-06-19 | American Cyanamid Co | Polyglycolic acid prosthetic devices |
US3875937A (en) * | 1963-10-31 | 1975-04-08 | American Cyanamid Co | Surgical dressings of absorbable polymers |
US3463158A (en) * | 1963-10-31 | 1969-08-26 | American Cyanamid Co | Polyglycolic acid prosthetic devices |
US3272204A (en) * | 1965-09-22 | 1966-09-13 | Ethicon Inc | Absorbable collagen prosthetic implant with non-absorbable reinforcing strands |
US3596656A (en) * | 1969-01-21 | 1971-08-03 | Bernd B Kaute | Fracture fixation device |
DE6938553U (en) * | 1969-10-03 | 1976-06-10 | Artur Fischer | RAIL FOR SURGICAL PURPOSES TO CONNECT BROKEN BONE PARTS. |
BE758156R (en) * | 1970-05-13 | 1971-04-28 | Ethicon Inc | ABSORBABLE SUTURE ELEMENT AND ITS |
US3918100A (en) * | 1974-05-13 | 1975-11-11 | Us Navy | Sputtering of bone on prostheses |
US3892649A (en) * | 1974-05-13 | 1975-07-01 | Us Navy | Electrodeposition of bone within a plastic matrix |
JPS5839533B2 (en) * | 1975-12-30 | 1983-08-30 | 住友化学工業株式会社 | Implant noseizouhouhou |
US4186448A (en) * | 1976-04-16 | 1980-02-05 | Brekke John H | Device and method for treating and healing a newly created bone void |
AT352867B (en) * | 1976-05-12 | 1979-10-10 | Battelle Institut E V | BONE REPLACEMENT, BONE COMPOUND OR PROSTHESIS ANCHORING MATERIAL AND PROCESS FOR ITS PRODUCTION |
FR2439003A1 (en) * | 1978-10-20 | 1980-05-16 | Anvar | NEW OSTEOSYNTHESIS PARTS, THEIR PREPARATION AND THEIR APPLICATION |
US4281420A (en) * | 1979-02-15 | 1981-08-04 | Raab S | Bone connective prostheses adapted to maximize strength and durability of prostheses-bone cement interface; and methods of forming same |
US4292695A (en) * | 1980-06-25 | 1981-10-06 | Lord Corporation | Prosthesis stem |
US4292694A (en) * | 1980-06-25 | 1981-10-06 | Lord Corporation | Prosthesis anchoring means |
-
1980
- 1980-11-21 US US06/208,906 patent/US4338926A/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
-
1981
- 1981-11-18 DE DE8181305439T patent/DE3165445D1/en not_active Expired
- 1981-11-18 EP EP81305439A patent/EP0052998B1/en not_active Expired
- 1981-11-20 CA CA000390495A patent/CA1166108A/en not_active Expired
- 1981-11-20 JP JP56186782A patent/JPS57117852A/en active Granted
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
JPH0229333B2 (en) | 1990-06-28 |
DE3165445D1 (en) | 1984-09-13 |
EP0052998B1 (en) | 1984-08-08 |
US4338926A (en) | 1982-07-13 |
EP0052998A1 (en) | 1982-06-02 |
JPS57117852A (en) | 1982-07-22 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
CA1166108A (en) | Bone prosthesis with controlled stiffness | |
Bos et al. | Bio-absorbable plates and screws for internal fixation of mandibular fractures: A study in six dogs | |
Törmälä | Biodegradable self-reinforced composite materials; manufacturing structure and mechanical properties | |
CA1229274A (en) | Surgical devices | |
US7648504B2 (en) | Bioabsorbable band system | |
Allgöwer et al. | A new plate for internal fixation—the dynamic compression plate (DCP) | |
US7833245B2 (en) | Intervertebral implant with movement resistant structure | |
Pihlajamaki et al. | Absorbable pins of self-reinforced poly-L-lactic acid for fixation of fractures and osteotomies | |
CA1302820C (en) | Bone fracture fixation plates | |
US6280473B1 (en) | Resorbable, macro-porous, non-collapsing and flexible membrane barrier for skeletal repair and regeneration | |
EP0928168B1 (en) | Resorbable, macro-porous, non-collapsing and flexible membrane barrier for skeletal repair and regeneration | |
US5993452A (en) | Cerclage system | |
US6712851B1 (en) | Resorbable, macro-porous non-collapsing and flexible membrane barrier for skeletal repair and regeneration | |
AU760855B2 (en) | Intramedullary nail with nonmetal spacers | |
US6783529B2 (en) | Non-metal inserts for bone support assembly | |
Cooney et al. | Scaphoid fractures: problems associated with nonunion and avascular necrosis | |
US20050261780A1 (en) | Form-fitting bioabsorbable mesh implant | |
Böstman et al. | Degradable polyglycolide rods for the internal fixation of displaced bimalleolar fractures | |
ES2006795A6 (en) | Surgical composite and use of a composite for manufacturing (part of) a device for use in bone surgery. | |
Jerosch et al. | Complications after treatment of patients with osteogenesis imperfecta with a Bailey-Dubow rod | |
Wakisaka et al. | A case of short metatarsal bones lengthened by callus distraction | |
Suuronen et al. | New generation biodegradable plate for fracture fixation: Comparison of bending strengths of mandibular osteotomies fixed with absorbable self-reinforced multi-layer poly-L-lactide plates and metallic plates—An experimental study in sheep | |
EP0844855B1 (en) | Endoprosthesis, in particular an artificial hip joint | |
Chen et al. | Revision of the ununited one-bone forearm | |
Vasenius et al. | Initial stability of femoral neck osteosynthesis with absorbable self‐reinforced poly‐L‐lactide (SR‐PLLA) and metallic screws: A comparative study on 21 cadavers |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
MKEX | Expiry |