CA1217274A - Process and apparatus for the regulation of ink feed controls in an offset printing machine - Google Patents
Process and apparatus for the regulation of ink feed controls in an offset printing machineInfo
- Publication number
- CA1217274A CA1217274A CA000466921A CA466921A CA1217274A CA 1217274 A CA1217274 A CA 1217274A CA 000466921 A CA000466921 A CA 000466921A CA 466921 A CA466921 A CA 466921A CA 1217274 A CA1217274 A CA 1217274A
- Authority
- CA
- Canada
- Prior art keywords
- values
- reflectance
- process according
- image elements
- printing
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Expired
Links
Classifications
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B41—PRINTING; LINING MACHINES; TYPEWRITERS; STAMPS
- B41F—PRINTING MACHINES OR PRESSES
- B41F33/00—Indicating, counting, warning, control or safety devices
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B41—PRINTING; LINING MACHINES; TYPEWRITERS; STAMPS
- B41F—PRINTING MACHINES OR PRESSES
- B41F33/00—Indicating, counting, warning, control or safety devices
- B41F33/0027—Devices for scanning originals, printing formes or the like for determining or presetting the ink supply
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B41—PRINTING; LINING MACHINES; TYPEWRITERS; STAMPS
- B41F—PRINTING MACHINES OR PRESSES
- B41F33/00—Indicating, counting, warning, control or safety devices
- B41F33/0036—Devices for scanning or checking the printed matter for quality control
Abstract
ABSTRACT OF THE DISCLOSURE
Printed products and their respective corres-ponding printing plates are divided into a plurality of image elements. For each image element the surface coverage is determined by photoelectric measurements; a reference reflectance value is then calculated from these measurements, taking into consideration such parameters as the printing characteristic. These reference reflectance values are compared with the actual reflectance values measured on the printed products and the results of the comparison are evaluated to from a quality measure and to calculate control values for the ink feed devices of the printing machine. In this manner, the use of special color measuring strips may be eliminated.
Printed products and their respective corres-ponding printing plates are divided into a plurality of image elements. For each image element the surface coverage is determined by photoelectric measurements; a reference reflectance value is then calculated from these measurements, taking into consideration such parameters as the printing characteristic. These reference reflectance values are compared with the actual reflectance values measured on the printed products and the results of the comparison are evaluated to from a quality measure and to calculate control values for the ink feed devices of the printing machine. In this manner, the use of special color measuring strips may be eliminated.
Description
7~
Case 3 14640/GTF 494/A
PROCESS AND APPARATUS FOR THE REGULATION OF INK FEED CONTROLS
IN AN OFFSET PRINTING MACHINE
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
The presen~ inven~ion relates to an apparatus and a proces~ for regulating ink feed controls in an offset prin~ing machine by photoelectric measurement of printed products and by the determination of setting values ~or ~he ink ~eed elemen~s from such measurement, and to an offset printing machine equipped with an appropriate apparatus for regulating ink feed controls.
The evaluation of print quality and the regu-lation of ink feed are usually effected by mean6 of standardized color control strips. These control strips, printed together with the products to be printed, are evaluated densitometrically and the color values of the printing machine set accordingly. The measurement of the color control strips may take place on the printing machine while it is running by means of so-called machine densitometers, or off-line, for exam-ple by means of an automatic scanning densitometer, wherein the control loop in bvth cases may be open (~uality evaluation) or clo~ed (machine regulation) in relation to the inking systems. A representative exam-ple of a computer-controlled printing machine having a closed control loop is described in U.S. Patent Nos.
4,200,932 and 3,835,777, among others.
In actual practice, it very frequently occurs, for example for reasons of format, that the use of a color control strip is not possible. In such cases, ink feeds mus~ be manually controlled, as before, on the basis of visual evaluation of the printed product, which manual process is highly undesirable.
It is known from U.S. Patent No. 3,958,509, EP-Publ. No~ 29561 and EP Publ. No. 69572 that surface coverage of printing plates zone by-zone by in-the-7;~
image measuremen~s can be determined and evaluated to enable either manual or machine pxese~ting of ink feed elements~ This, however, merely involves a single prese~ting, while no onyoing regula~ion proper of the ink feed elements takes place during the course of printing.
A similar system~ wherein a printed reference product found to be satisfactory is compared with the printed product to be evaluated by image elements in 10keeping with various criteria, is also known ~rom pub- !
lished UK application 2 115 145. In the final analy-sis, this system leads merely to a binary quality eval-uation of "good" or "bad" and is not intended, nor is it suitable, for the automatic control of ink feeds.
15t)BJECTS AND BRIEF SUMMARY OF TEIE INVENTION
It is an object of the present invention to eliminate the above-noted difficulties and to provide an opportullity in which printing machine ink feed con-trols may be automatically regulated by effecting measurements "in the image", and without ~he use of color control strips.
Briefly, a process according to the present invention or regulating ink feed controls in an offset printing machine includes the steps of: dividing a ref-erence for the individual printing inks into a plural-ity of image elemen~s and determining the surface coverage for each element, the reference being in the form either of a printing plate, a photographic master upon which said plate is based (as in the case of initial setting and start-up of the printing machine), or a printed product which has previously been judged to be satis~actory ~an "OK ~heet") ~as in the case of ongoing regulation of printing): determining a reference r~flectance value for each image element or each printing ink as a unction of such parameters, among others, as a printing characteristic and the effect of full tone density upon reflectance variation as a function of surface coverage; dividing printed products into image elements; determining an actual reflectance value for each printing ink, for ~ach image element of said printed pr~duc~s; and determining setting values for the ink feed control elements by comparing the actual reflectance values with the corresponding reference reflectiqe values.
Other objects and advantages of the present invention can be recognized by a reference to the appended claims.
The present invention will become more apparent to one skilled in the art to which it pertaîns from the following detailed description when read with reference to the drawings, in whichs ~o Fig. 1 is a schematic block diagram of an offset printing machine equipped according to thP
present invention;
Fig. 2 is a diagram illustrating the print zones and image elements of the measuring method of the present invention; and Fig. 3 is an enlarged diagram of an image element of the measuring method of the present invention shown in FigO 2.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
The overall installation shown in Fig~ 1 includes a four-color offset printing machine 100, three photoelectric scanning devices 120, 220 and 320r r---4~
three computers 150, 250 and 350 and four optical display devices or moni~ors 171, 172, 270 and 370.
The offset printing machine 100 is of a con-ventional design, its ink feed elements 111-114 (ink zone screws) being indicated only symbolicallyO
Scanning device 120 is known as a l'machine densitometer", having four scanning channels 121-124, one for each color of printing inks, and built into the printin~ machine 100. With scanning device 120, 10 prin~ed produc~s may be measured densitometrically on the printing machine 100 while it is running. Examples of suitable machine densitometers are descrlbed in U.S.
Patent Nos. 2,968,988; 3,376,426; 3,835,777; 3,890~048;
and 4,003,660, among others. The scanning device 120 15 shall be designated hereinafter as "machine densito-meter 120".
Scanning device 220 is used for the photoelectric measurement of printing pla~es or of the halftone films (photo~raphic masters~ upon which they 20 are based. The scanning device 220 may be a commercially available scanning device ("scanner"), as is used for lithographic film, or any other suitable scanning means, for example according to U.S. Patent Nos. 4,131,879 and 3,95&,509/ or European Application 25 Publ. Nos. 69572, 96227 and 29561, whereby it is possible to scan printing plate~ or halftone films photoelectrically with a resolution as specified in more detail below. Scanning device 220 shall be designated hereinafter as "plate scanner 220", regard-30 less of its type or the object actually scanned.
Scanning device 320 is used, for example, for the photoelec~ric measurement of printed products found to be ~ualitatively satisfactory by visual inspection, which satisfactory printed products are known as :~Z172~7'~
"proofs" or "OK sheets". This scanning device 320 scans the proofs or OK sheets in exac~ly the same man-ner as the machine densitometer 120 scans the printed products, and is therefore designed accordingly. In actual practice OK sheets may be scanned without diffi-culty, and even advantageously, directly by the machine densitometer 120 in printing machine 100. However, to facilitate comprehension of the present invention, this scanning device, designated hereafter as "OK sheet scanner 320", is shown as a separate element in Fig. 1.
The four optical display units 171, 172, 270 and 370 preferably are color television monitors, permitting the graphical display of the measured values or of the data determined by the computers from such values. It is no~ absolutely necessary to employ four separate display units; they are shown in this fasion only to facilitate comprehension of the present inven-tion. Similarly, the installa~ion could be provided with only a single computer or computing means in place of three, which compu~er then would service all of the respective scanning devices and display units connected to it. On the other hand, the plate scanner 220, together with its computer 250 and its display uni~
270, and the OK sheet scanner 320, together with its computer 350 and its display unit 370, may also consti-tute independent units, which then would be connected to the computer 150 by means, for example, of a cable 251 or 351, respectively. All of these embodimen~s are indicated in Fig. 1 by broken lines. However, these embodiments are not essential to an appreciation of the present invention, and the invention is in no way restricted to them.
The general mode of operation of the installation shown in FigO 1 is as follows:
7~7~
Printed produc~s D ~sheets) and the printing pla~es P upon which they are based are divided in a uniform manner into a plurality of image elements E
(Fig. 2)o By means of the pla~e scanner 220 each image element E of the printing pla~es P (in this case, four plates) is measured photoelectrically, and as explained below, a reference reflectance value Rs is calculated from such measurements, which reflectance value the image element E of the printed products should display for the particular ink concerned, if printing is effected using correctly adjusted ink feeds, etc.
In a similar manner, the printed products D
are scanned photoelectrically while the printing machine is running by means of the machine densitometer 120 (or individual sheets are scanned off-line on their own scanning device, for example, an OK sheet scanner 320) and for each color of printing ink and for every image element E an ac~ual reflec~ance value Ri is determined.
In the cornputer 150 the individual reference reflectance values Rs and the corresponding actual reflectance values ~i are then compared with each other and from the results of the comparison, control values (setting values) ST are calcula~ed for con~rolling ink feed elements 111-114 of the printing machine 100, thereby regulating the ink feed of the printing machine 100. If desired, a measurement of print quality (quality measure Q) can be obtained ~and suitably displayed) from such comparison, as well.
The display or monitor units 171, 172, 270 and 370 may be used for the graphical display of the scanning values and of the values calculated ther~-from. For example, uni~ 270 may display the surface coverage or the brightness diskribution of the individ-~'~
~Z17~74L
ual printing plates P de~ermined from such values; unit 370 may display the brightness distribution of the OK
sheets; unit 171 may display the reference reflectance values Rs and the respective actual reflectance values Ri; and unit 172 may display their differences. Of course, the display uni~s may also display any other data that may be of interest.
The process according to the present invention is thus based on the recognition that, in offset printing, it is possible under certain conditions to predict the reflectance variation of an image element of the printed produc~ for the respective individual printing ink colors from ~he surface coverage of the image element involved in the printing plate (or the corresponding halftone film). These condi~ions include ~mong others, on the one hand the knowledge of the characteristic of the printing machine and th~ effect o the full-tone density on the reflect-ance variation as a function of surface coverage, and on the other, that the image elements be adequately small to provide meaningful results.
The printing chracteristic, which takes into consideration such effects as paper quality, printing ink, point incr~ment, ink receptivity, overprinting, wet-in-wet printing, etc., may be determined empiri-cally in a relatively simple manner. For this purpose, ~ables are prepared for the reflectance as a function of the surface coverage of the printing platest with the tabulated values being obtained by measuring standardized color tables printed under representative conditions on the particular printing machine con-cerned. To measure such color tables, preferably the same scanning device is utilized that will be used later in actual operation to measure the printed products~ and in the present case, is thus the machine densitometer 120.
The effect of full tone density on the varia-tion of reflectance as the result of point increments may also be determined from tables. To produce these tables, the aforementioned color tables are printed under appropriate printing conditions, i.e. with vary~
ing full tone density of all printing inks.
To obtain the highest accuracy possible, the image elements E should be made as small as possible, A natural lower limit is set by the halftone fineness (for example 60 lines per cm). In actual practicet however, this lower limit canno~ be attained for tech-nical, and especially for economic reasons. This is true par~icularly for measuring the printed product~ D
with the machine running, in that under these condi-tions the volume of data obtained using the usual sheet formats cannot be recorded and processed within the time available using an economically justifiable effort. In addition~ considerable positioning problems would arise.
For reflectance measurements on a running printing machine, image elements E having individual surface areas of approximately 25 to 400 mm2 are justi-fiable. In practice an image element E may, forexample, have a square shape with a surface area of about 1 cm2. However, with image elements E o this size, the predetermination of reflectances by means of the surface coverages of the printing plate is too inaccurate to take overprinting into account.
According to an important aspect of the present invention, therefore, each individual element E
of the prin~ing plates P (or the respective halftone films upon which they are bas~d) is divided into a ~172~
g large number (100 for example) of subelements SE and the surface coverage is determîned for each of these subelements. The determination of the surface coverage for the image elements of the printing plates is thus effected with a higher resolution than the determina-tion of the reflectance of the image elemen~s of the printed products. This is readily justi~iable, both technically and economically, in that ~he measurements on the printing plates may be performed on an object at rest, and further, in that only one measurement must be made at a time, and enough time is available in actual practice. The size of the subelements SE may amount to approximately 0.25 to 25 mm2, with a practical example being about 1 mm~ with reference to an image element of approximately 1 cm ~ The resolution can be increased by thiS me~hod by a fac or of ~en.
The determination of the surface coverage of each individual subelement SE is performed wi~h the aid of the plate scanner 220 in a well-known manner, for example by measuring t.he reflectance integrally over the surface area of the subelement or by means of television scanning, or scanning by means of discrete photosensor fields, or the like. For each subelement SE (and of course for each color of printing ink) a subreference reflectance value RSs is then calculated rom the surface coverage by means of the printing characteristic previously determined from tables, and with ~onsideration of overprinting ~intermediate tabu-lar values may be found by interpolation). From the individual subreference reflectance values RSs of each image element E, then, for example by arithmetic aver-aging, the reerence reflectance value RS f the par~
ticular image element E concerned is calculated; refer ence reflectance values Rs are used for comparison with .
- iL217~7~
the corresponding actual reflectance vaLues Ri of the printed products D.
The effec~ of the full tone density on the point increment depends, as mentioned above, on the surface coverage. According to a further important aspect of the invention, therefore, each subelement SE
is assigned a sub-fulltone weightins factor GSe to ~ake this effect into account. These weighting factors GSe contain the necessary full tone variation (layer thick-ness variation) for each printing ink for a particular desired refle~tion variation, taking into account over-printing and the local surface coverage. The weighting factors GSe may be determined from tablPs of full tone variation as a function of change in reflectance.
These ~ables may in turn be determined from the ~abular values for the reflectance as a function of full tone density (see the effect o~ full tone density).
From the sub~full tone weighting factors GSe of the individual subelements SE of each image element E, a mean full tone weighting factor Ge is determined, for example by arithmetic averaging, for the image elements E involved. These mean full tone weighting factors Ge are then used to determine the weight at which a possible deviation or difference of the actual reflec~ance value Ri from the reference reflectance value Rs of each individual image element E, is to enter into the calculation of the quality measure Q and the control values ST for regulating the ink feeds. In the formulation of the mean full tone weight factor Ge~
for example, in the event a large standard devia~ion exists, the standard deviation may also be taken into consideration in the sense of a reduction of weigh~ing.
It is further possible, in the evaluation of printing quality according to the present invention, to
Case 3 14640/GTF 494/A
PROCESS AND APPARATUS FOR THE REGULATION OF INK FEED CONTROLS
IN AN OFFSET PRINTING MACHINE
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
The presen~ inven~ion relates to an apparatus and a proces~ for regulating ink feed controls in an offset prin~ing machine by photoelectric measurement of printed products and by the determination of setting values ~or ~he ink ~eed elemen~s from such measurement, and to an offset printing machine equipped with an appropriate apparatus for regulating ink feed controls.
The evaluation of print quality and the regu-lation of ink feed are usually effected by mean6 of standardized color control strips. These control strips, printed together with the products to be printed, are evaluated densitometrically and the color values of the printing machine set accordingly. The measurement of the color control strips may take place on the printing machine while it is running by means of so-called machine densitometers, or off-line, for exam-ple by means of an automatic scanning densitometer, wherein the control loop in bvth cases may be open (~uality evaluation) or clo~ed (machine regulation) in relation to the inking systems. A representative exam-ple of a computer-controlled printing machine having a closed control loop is described in U.S. Patent Nos.
4,200,932 and 3,835,777, among others.
In actual practice, it very frequently occurs, for example for reasons of format, that the use of a color control strip is not possible. In such cases, ink feeds mus~ be manually controlled, as before, on the basis of visual evaluation of the printed product, which manual process is highly undesirable.
It is known from U.S. Patent No. 3,958,509, EP-Publ. No~ 29561 and EP Publ. No. 69572 that surface coverage of printing plates zone by-zone by in-the-7;~
image measuremen~s can be determined and evaluated to enable either manual or machine pxese~ting of ink feed elements~ This, however, merely involves a single prese~ting, while no onyoing regula~ion proper of the ink feed elements takes place during the course of printing.
A similar system~ wherein a printed reference product found to be satisfactory is compared with the printed product to be evaluated by image elements in 10keeping with various criteria, is also known ~rom pub- !
lished UK application 2 115 145. In the final analy-sis, this system leads merely to a binary quality eval-uation of "good" or "bad" and is not intended, nor is it suitable, for the automatic control of ink feeds.
15t)BJECTS AND BRIEF SUMMARY OF TEIE INVENTION
It is an object of the present invention to eliminate the above-noted difficulties and to provide an opportullity in which printing machine ink feed con-trols may be automatically regulated by effecting measurements "in the image", and without ~he use of color control strips.
Briefly, a process according to the present invention or regulating ink feed controls in an offset printing machine includes the steps of: dividing a ref-erence for the individual printing inks into a plural-ity of image elemen~s and determining the surface coverage for each element, the reference being in the form either of a printing plate, a photographic master upon which said plate is based (as in the case of initial setting and start-up of the printing machine), or a printed product which has previously been judged to be satis~actory ~an "OK ~heet") ~as in the case of ongoing regulation of printing): determining a reference r~flectance value for each image element or each printing ink as a unction of such parameters, among others, as a printing characteristic and the effect of full tone density upon reflectance variation as a function of surface coverage; dividing printed products into image elements; determining an actual reflectance value for each printing ink, for ~ach image element of said printed pr~duc~s; and determining setting values for the ink feed control elements by comparing the actual reflectance values with the corresponding reference reflectiqe values.
Other objects and advantages of the present invention can be recognized by a reference to the appended claims.
The present invention will become more apparent to one skilled in the art to which it pertaîns from the following detailed description when read with reference to the drawings, in whichs ~o Fig. 1 is a schematic block diagram of an offset printing machine equipped according to thP
present invention;
Fig. 2 is a diagram illustrating the print zones and image elements of the measuring method of the present invention; and Fig. 3 is an enlarged diagram of an image element of the measuring method of the present invention shown in FigO 2.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
The overall installation shown in Fig~ 1 includes a four-color offset printing machine 100, three photoelectric scanning devices 120, 220 and 320r r---4~
three computers 150, 250 and 350 and four optical display devices or moni~ors 171, 172, 270 and 370.
The offset printing machine 100 is of a con-ventional design, its ink feed elements 111-114 (ink zone screws) being indicated only symbolicallyO
Scanning device 120 is known as a l'machine densitometer", having four scanning channels 121-124, one for each color of printing inks, and built into the printin~ machine 100. With scanning device 120, 10 prin~ed produc~s may be measured densitometrically on the printing machine 100 while it is running. Examples of suitable machine densitometers are descrlbed in U.S.
Patent Nos. 2,968,988; 3,376,426; 3,835,777; 3,890~048;
and 4,003,660, among others. The scanning device 120 15 shall be designated hereinafter as "machine densito-meter 120".
Scanning device 220 is used for the photoelectric measurement of printing pla~es or of the halftone films (photo~raphic masters~ upon which they 20 are based. The scanning device 220 may be a commercially available scanning device ("scanner"), as is used for lithographic film, or any other suitable scanning means, for example according to U.S. Patent Nos. 4,131,879 and 3,95&,509/ or European Application 25 Publ. Nos. 69572, 96227 and 29561, whereby it is possible to scan printing plate~ or halftone films photoelectrically with a resolution as specified in more detail below. Scanning device 220 shall be designated hereinafter as "plate scanner 220", regard-30 less of its type or the object actually scanned.
Scanning device 320 is used, for example, for the photoelec~ric measurement of printed products found to be ~ualitatively satisfactory by visual inspection, which satisfactory printed products are known as :~Z172~7'~
"proofs" or "OK sheets". This scanning device 320 scans the proofs or OK sheets in exac~ly the same man-ner as the machine densitometer 120 scans the printed products, and is therefore designed accordingly. In actual practice OK sheets may be scanned without diffi-culty, and even advantageously, directly by the machine densitometer 120 in printing machine 100. However, to facilitate comprehension of the present invention, this scanning device, designated hereafter as "OK sheet scanner 320", is shown as a separate element in Fig. 1.
The four optical display units 171, 172, 270 and 370 preferably are color television monitors, permitting the graphical display of the measured values or of the data determined by the computers from such values. It is no~ absolutely necessary to employ four separate display units; they are shown in this fasion only to facilitate comprehension of the present inven-tion. Similarly, the installa~ion could be provided with only a single computer or computing means in place of three, which compu~er then would service all of the respective scanning devices and display units connected to it. On the other hand, the plate scanner 220, together with its computer 250 and its display uni~
270, and the OK sheet scanner 320, together with its computer 350 and its display unit 370, may also consti-tute independent units, which then would be connected to the computer 150 by means, for example, of a cable 251 or 351, respectively. All of these embodimen~s are indicated in Fig. 1 by broken lines. However, these embodiments are not essential to an appreciation of the present invention, and the invention is in no way restricted to them.
The general mode of operation of the installation shown in FigO 1 is as follows:
7~7~
Printed produc~s D ~sheets) and the printing pla~es P upon which they are based are divided in a uniform manner into a plurality of image elements E
(Fig. 2)o By means of the pla~e scanner 220 each image element E of the printing pla~es P (in this case, four plates) is measured photoelectrically, and as explained below, a reference reflectance value Rs is calculated from such measurements, which reflectance value the image element E of the printed products should display for the particular ink concerned, if printing is effected using correctly adjusted ink feeds, etc.
In a similar manner, the printed products D
are scanned photoelectrically while the printing machine is running by means of the machine densitometer 120 (or individual sheets are scanned off-line on their own scanning device, for example, an OK sheet scanner 320) and for each color of printing ink and for every image element E an ac~ual reflec~ance value Ri is determined.
In the cornputer 150 the individual reference reflectance values Rs and the corresponding actual reflectance values ~i are then compared with each other and from the results of the comparison, control values (setting values) ST are calcula~ed for con~rolling ink feed elements 111-114 of the printing machine 100, thereby regulating the ink feed of the printing machine 100. If desired, a measurement of print quality (quality measure Q) can be obtained ~and suitably displayed) from such comparison, as well.
The display or monitor units 171, 172, 270 and 370 may be used for the graphical display of the scanning values and of the values calculated ther~-from. For example, uni~ 270 may display the surface coverage or the brightness diskribution of the individ-~'~
~Z17~74L
ual printing plates P de~ermined from such values; unit 370 may display the brightness distribution of the OK
sheets; unit 171 may display the reference reflectance values Rs and the respective actual reflectance values Ri; and unit 172 may display their differences. Of course, the display uni~s may also display any other data that may be of interest.
The process according to the present invention is thus based on the recognition that, in offset printing, it is possible under certain conditions to predict the reflectance variation of an image element of the printed produc~ for the respective individual printing ink colors from ~he surface coverage of the image element involved in the printing plate (or the corresponding halftone film). These condi~ions include ~mong others, on the one hand the knowledge of the characteristic of the printing machine and th~ effect o the full-tone density on the reflect-ance variation as a function of surface coverage, and on the other, that the image elements be adequately small to provide meaningful results.
The printing chracteristic, which takes into consideration such effects as paper quality, printing ink, point incr~ment, ink receptivity, overprinting, wet-in-wet printing, etc., may be determined empiri-cally in a relatively simple manner. For this purpose, ~ables are prepared for the reflectance as a function of the surface coverage of the printing platest with the tabulated values being obtained by measuring standardized color tables printed under representative conditions on the particular printing machine con-cerned. To measure such color tables, preferably the same scanning device is utilized that will be used later in actual operation to measure the printed products~ and in the present case, is thus the machine densitometer 120.
The effect of full tone density on the varia-tion of reflectance as the result of point increments may also be determined from tables. To produce these tables, the aforementioned color tables are printed under appropriate printing conditions, i.e. with vary~
ing full tone density of all printing inks.
To obtain the highest accuracy possible, the image elements E should be made as small as possible, A natural lower limit is set by the halftone fineness (for example 60 lines per cm). In actual practicet however, this lower limit canno~ be attained for tech-nical, and especially for economic reasons. This is true par~icularly for measuring the printed product~ D
with the machine running, in that under these condi-tions the volume of data obtained using the usual sheet formats cannot be recorded and processed within the time available using an economically justifiable effort. In addition~ considerable positioning problems would arise.
For reflectance measurements on a running printing machine, image elements E having individual surface areas of approximately 25 to 400 mm2 are justi-fiable. In practice an image element E may, forexample, have a square shape with a surface area of about 1 cm2. However, with image elements E o this size, the predetermination of reflectances by means of the surface coverages of the printing plate is too inaccurate to take overprinting into account.
According to an important aspect of the present invention, therefore, each individual element E
of the prin~ing plates P (or the respective halftone films upon which they are bas~d) is divided into a ~172~
g large number (100 for example) of subelements SE and the surface coverage is determîned for each of these subelements. The determination of the surface coverage for the image elements of the printing plates is thus effected with a higher resolution than the determina-tion of the reflectance of the image elemen~s of the printed products. This is readily justi~iable, both technically and economically, in that ~he measurements on the printing plates may be performed on an object at rest, and further, in that only one measurement must be made at a time, and enough time is available in actual practice. The size of the subelements SE may amount to approximately 0.25 to 25 mm2, with a practical example being about 1 mm~ with reference to an image element of approximately 1 cm ~ The resolution can be increased by thiS me~hod by a fac or of ~en.
The determination of the surface coverage of each individual subelement SE is performed wi~h the aid of the plate scanner 220 in a well-known manner, for example by measuring t.he reflectance integrally over the surface area of the subelement or by means of television scanning, or scanning by means of discrete photosensor fields, or the like. For each subelement SE (and of course for each color of printing ink) a subreference reflectance value RSs is then calculated rom the surface coverage by means of the printing characteristic previously determined from tables, and with ~onsideration of overprinting ~intermediate tabu-lar values may be found by interpolation). From the individual subreference reflectance values RSs of each image element E, then, for example by arithmetic aver-aging, the reerence reflectance value RS f the par~
ticular image element E concerned is calculated; refer ence reflectance values Rs are used for comparison with .
- iL217~7~
the corresponding actual reflectance vaLues Ri of the printed products D.
The effec~ of the full tone density on the point increment depends, as mentioned above, on the surface coverage. According to a further important aspect of the invention, therefore, each subelement SE
is assigned a sub-fulltone weightins factor GSe to ~ake this effect into account. These weighting factors GSe contain the necessary full tone variation (layer thick-ness variation) for each printing ink for a particular desired refle~tion variation, taking into account over-printing and the local surface coverage. The weighting factors GSe may be determined from tablPs of full tone variation as a function of change in reflectance.
These ~ables may in turn be determined from the ~abular values for the reflectance as a function of full tone density (see the effect o~ full tone density).
From the sub~full tone weighting factors GSe of the individual subelements SE of each image element E, a mean full tone weighting factor Ge is determined, for example by arithmetic averaging, for the image elements E involved. These mean full tone weighting factors Ge are then used to determine the weight at which a possible deviation or difference of the actual reflec~ance value Ri from the reference reflectance value Rs of each individual image element E, is to enter into the calculation of the quality measure Q and the control values ST for regulating the ink feeds. In the formulation of the mean full tone weight factor Ge~
for example, in the event a large standard devia~ion exists, the standard deviation may also be taken into consideration in the sense of a reduction of weigh~ing.
It is further possible, in the evaluation of printing quality according to the present invention, to
2~'~
assign to each individual image element E (or even each subelement SE) a perception weighting factor He (or sub-perception wei~hting factor HSe), representing a sensitometric evaluation scale for the reference-actual value deviations or differences. These perception weighting factors may be determined for example in accordance with CIELAB (Comite International de l'Eclairage) from the sensitometric values L*, a*, b*
def ined therein.
~or this evaluation of printing qualityt a quality measure Q is ~hen calculated and displayed in an appropriate manner with ~he aid of the deviations ~e between the measured actual reflectance values Ri and the calculated reference reflectance values Rs, for each printing ink. This quality measure Q may be calculated for example by weighting the deviations ~e with at least one of the associated full-tone and perception weighting factors Ge or He~ and adding ~integrating) the deviations a e over one or several selected surface areas of the printed product~ The surface areas may be adapted to the particular printed product involved. It is further possible to obtain several quality measures in this manner.
Printing zones Z (Fig. 2) determined by the printing machine 100 play a particular role as surface areas. An actual zone value Zi and a reference zone value Zs are formed from the actual and reference values Ri and Rs, respectively. Setting values ST for the ink feed control elements are then detexmined by comparing the actual zone values with the re~erence zone values. For the automatic control of the ink feed elements 111-114 of printing machine 100, the control values ST are preferably determined individually for each printing æone, by determining a zone error value :~2~7Z~
Z, by summins7 (integrating) the deviations~ e of the actual reflectance values ~i from the reference reflectance values Rs of ~he image elements E, weighted with the full tone weighting factors Ge~ over the entire print zone Z involved. Other evaluation and çalculating methods are also possible, The regulation, per se, of the ink feed elements 111-114 on the basis of control values ST is effected in a well known manner (see for example U.S.
Patent No. 4,200,932) and is not an object of the present inventio7l~
The surface coverages dPtermined by the plate scanner 220 may be integra~ed over the individual printing zones Z and used, for example, as described in U.S~ Patent No. 3,185,0~8, for presetting the ink feed elements.
As mentioned above~ ~he precalculation of the reference reflectance values RS of the individual image elements E is effected on the basis of the surface coverages of the corres~nding image elements of the individual printing plates P or, if measurements on these plates are not feasible for some reason, of the corresponding halftone films (photographic masters) from which the respective printing plates were prepared This is true for makin~ the initial settings and for the startup of the printing machine 100. For the regulation of ongoing printing, however, a printed produc~ judged to be satisfactory, an "OK sheet'7, ORB, may also be used without difficulty as a basis of comparison. It would then no longer be necessary to scan the latter with the same resolution as the print-ing plates P, in that in this case, only the reflectances in the individual image elements are of L2~727'~
interest. These reflectances may be determined, if not already present in memoryt by means of the OK sheet scanner 320 or the plate scanner 220. At least one of the weighting factors Ge and He assigned to the individual image elements may be used from the earlier measure~ents of the printing plates P~
The densitometric measurement of ~he printed products D on the machine during operation may be effected in numerous ways, as long as the reflectance or reflectance variation is detected for each color.
It is not absolutely necessary to completely measure each individual printed product D; rather, it is suffi-cient to perform a sequential measurement of different imagc elements on successive printed products.
Furthermore, for example, each individual ink may be me~sured behind its respective ink feed device, or the reflectances in the individual colors may be determined together on the finished printed product. Double measurements ~made in front of and behind each individ-ual ink feed element) aLe especially appropriate, as inthis manner the effect of each individual ink may be determined in an especially accurate fashion.
It should be mentioned finally that in place of scanning the printing plates or the halftone films, it is also possible to utilize scanning data obtained in the preparation of lithographic films or printing plates.
The principles, preferred embodiments and modes of operation of the present invention have been ~2~L727~
described in the foregoing specification. The inven-tion which is intended to be protected herein, however, is not to be construed as limited to the particular forms disclosed, since ~hese are to be regarded as illustrative, rather than restrictive. Variations and changes may be made by those skilled in ~he art without departing from the spirit of the invention.
assign to each individual image element E (or even each subelement SE) a perception weighting factor He (or sub-perception wei~hting factor HSe), representing a sensitometric evaluation scale for the reference-actual value deviations or differences. These perception weighting factors may be determined for example in accordance with CIELAB (Comite International de l'Eclairage) from the sensitometric values L*, a*, b*
def ined therein.
~or this evaluation of printing qualityt a quality measure Q is ~hen calculated and displayed in an appropriate manner with ~he aid of the deviations ~e between the measured actual reflectance values Ri and the calculated reference reflectance values Rs, for each printing ink. This quality measure Q may be calculated for example by weighting the deviations ~e with at least one of the associated full-tone and perception weighting factors Ge or He~ and adding ~integrating) the deviations a e over one or several selected surface areas of the printed product~ The surface areas may be adapted to the particular printed product involved. It is further possible to obtain several quality measures in this manner.
Printing zones Z (Fig. 2) determined by the printing machine 100 play a particular role as surface areas. An actual zone value Zi and a reference zone value Zs are formed from the actual and reference values Ri and Rs, respectively. Setting values ST for the ink feed control elements are then detexmined by comparing the actual zone values with the re~erence zone values. For the automatic control of the ink feed elements 111-114 of printing machine 100, the control values ST are preferably determined individually for each printing æone, by determining a zone error value :~2~7Z~
Z, by summins7 (integrating) the deviations~ e of the actual reflectance values ~i from the reference reflectance values Rs of ~he image elements E, weighted with the full tone weighting factors Ge~ over the entire print zone Z involved. Other evaluation and çalculating methods are also possible, The regulation, per se, of the ink feed elements 111-114 on the basis of control values ST is effected in a well known manner (see for example U.S.
Patent No. 4,200,932) and is not an object of the present inventio7l~
The surface coverages dPtermined by the plate scanner 220 may be integra~ed over the individual printing zones Z and used, for example, as described in U.S~ Patent No. 3,185,0~8, for presetting the ink feed elements.
As mentioned above~ ~he precalculation of the reference reflectance values RS of the individual image elements E is effected on the basis of the surface coverages of the corres~nding image elements of the individual printing plates P or, if measurements on these plates are not feasible for some reason, of the corresponding halftone films (photographic masters) from which the respective printing plates were prepared This is true for makin~ the initial settings and for the startup of the printing machine 100. For the regulation of ongoing printing, however, a printed produc~ judged to be satisfactory, an "OK sheet'7, ORB, may also be used without difficulty as a basis of comparison. It would then no longer be necessary to scan the latter with the same resolution as the print-ing plates P, in that in this case, only the reflectances in the individual image elements are of L2~727'~
interest. These reflectances may be determined, if not already present in memoryt by means of the OK sheet scanner 320 or the plate scanner 220. At least one of the weighting factors Ge and He assigned to the individual image elements may be used from the earlier measure~ents of the printing plates P~
The densitometric measurement of ~he printed products D on the machine during operation may be effected in numerous ways, as long as the reflectance or reflectance variation is detected for each color.
It is not absolutely necessary to completely measure each individual printed product D; rather, it is suffi-cient to perform a sequential measurement of different imagc elements on successive printed products.
Furthermore, for example, each individual ink may be me~sured behind its respective ink feed device, or the reflectances in the individual colors may be determined together on the finished printed product. Double measurements ~made in front of and behind each individ-ual ink feed element) aLe especially appropriate, as inthis manner the effect of each individual ink may be determined in an especially accurate fashion.
It should be mentioned finally that in place of scanning the printing plates or the halftone films, it is also possible to utilize scanning data obtained in the preparation of lithographic films or printing plates.
The principles, preferred embodiments and modes of operation of the present invention have been ~2~L727~
described in the foregoing specification. The inven-tion which is intended to be protected herein, however, is not to be construed as limited to the particular forms disclosed, since ~hese are to be regarded as illustrative, rather than restrictive. Variations and changes may be made by those skilled in ~he art without departing from the spirit of the invention.
Claims (35)
1. A process for regulating ink feed controls in an offset printing machine which makes photoelectric measurements of printed products and determines setting values for ink feed elements for respective ink colors from said measurements, compris-ing the steps of: dividing a reference for the individual printing inks into a plurality of image elements and determining the surface coverage for each element, the reference being in the form of at least one of a printing plate, a photographic master upon which said plate is based, and a printed product which has previously been determined to be satisfactory;
determining a reference reflectance value Rs for each image element for each respective color of printing ink as a function of at least one of such parameters as a printing characteristic, and the effect of full tone density upon reflectance variation as a function of surface coverage; dividing printed products into image elements; determining, for each respective printing ink, an actual reflectance value Ri for each image element of said printed products; and determining setting values ST for the ink feed control elements by comparing the actual reflectance values Ri with the corresponding reference reflective values Rs.
determining a reference reflectance value Rs for each image element for each respective color of printing ink as a function of at least one of such parameters as a printing characteristic, and the effect of full tone density upon reflectance variation as a function of surface coverage; dividing printed products into image elements; determining, for each respective printing ink, an actual reflectance value Ri for each image element of said printed products; and determining setting values ST for the ink feed control elements by comparing the actual reflectance values Ri with the corresponding reference reflective values Rs.
2. A process according to Claim 1, wherein each of a plurality of printing zones is defined by a plurality of image elements, and further comprising the steps of forming a reference zone value Zs and an actual zone value Zi from the respective reference values Rs and actual reflectance values Ri of the image elements defining a particular zone and determining the setting values ST for the ink feed controls by com-paring the actual zone values Zi with the reference zone values Zs.
3. A process according to Claim 1 further comprising the steps of: assigning a full tone weight-ing factor Ge to each image element as a function of the surface coverage and ink color measured, said weighting factor describing the effect of the full tone density on the reflectance; and weighting the devia-tions between the actual reflectance values Ri and the corresponding actual reflectance values Rs with the associated full tone weighting factor Ge.
4. A process according to Claim 3, wherein the step of determining the surface coverage for the image elements of the reference is effected with a higher resolution than that obtained by the step of determining the actual reflectance values Ri for the respective image elements of the printed product.
5. A process according to Claim 4, wherein the step of determining the surface coverage for the image elements is performed by measuring reflectance by integrating over the surface area of the image elements.
6. A process according to Claim 5, wherein the step of determining the surface coverage for the image elements is effected with a resolution ten times greater than that obtained by the step of determining the actual reflectance values Ri for the respective image elements of the printed products.
7. A process according to Claim 6, wherein the surface area of the respective image elements ranges from 25 to 400 mm2.
8. A process according to Claim 7, wherein the surface area of the respective image elements is approximately 1 cm2.
9. A process according to Claim 4, further comprising the step of dividing the image elements into subelements of approximately 0.25 to 25 mm2.
10. A process according to Claim 9, wherein the image elements are divided into subelements of approximately 1 mm2.
11. A process according to Claim 9, further comprising the step of: determining a subreference reflectance value RSs for each subelement of an image element, taking into consideration important parameters of the printing process; and wherein the respective reference reflectance values Rs of the image elements are determined from all of the respective subreference reflectance values RSs.
12. A process according to Claim 11, wherein the reference reflectance value Rs is calculated by averaging the subreference reflectance values RSs.
13. A process according to Claim 11, further comprising the steps of: assigning a sub-full tone weighting factor GSe to each subelement, and calculat-ing the full tone weighting factor Ge of an image ele-ment by averaging the sub-full tone weight factors GSe of the subelements of the respective image elements.
14. A process according to Claim 13, further comprising the steps of: for each printing ink, deter-mining a zone error value .DELTA.z from differences .DELTA.e between actual reflectance values Ri and the reference reflectance values Rs of the image elements belonging to the printing zone involved, by integrating the dif-ferences .DELTA.e, weighted with the full tone weighting factor Ge, over the print zone; and determining the setting values for the ink feed elements from the zone error values .DELTA.z.
15. The process according to Claim 3, wherein, for each printing ink color, the reference reflectance values Rs and the corresponding full tone weight factors Ge of the image elements are obtained from the same reference.
16. The process according to Claim 3, wherein the reference reflectance values Rs are determined on the basis of a printed product found to be satisfactory, and the full tone weighting factors Ge are determined from the corresponding printing plates of photographic masters.
17. The process according to Claim 3, wherein the step of determining the reflectance values Ri from the printed products is performed by measuring the printed products densitometrically in front of and behind each printing mechanism.
18. A process according to Claim 2, further comprising the steps of: assigning a full tone weight-ing factor Ge to each image element as a function of the surface coverage and ink color measured, said weighting factor describing the effect of the full tone density on the reflectance; and weighting the differ-ences between the actual reflectance values Ri and the corresponding reference reflectance values Rs with the associated full tone weighting factor Ge.
19. A process according to Claim 18, wherein the step of determining the surface coverage for the image elements of the reference is effected with a higher resolution than that obtained by the step of determining the actual reflectance values Ri for the respective image elements of the printed product.
20. A process according to Claim 19, wherein the step of determining the surface coverage for the image elements is performed by measuring reflectance integrally over the surface area of the image elements.
21. A process according to Claim 20, wherein the step of determining the surface coverage for the image elements is effected with a resolution ten times greater than that obtained by the step of determining the actual reflectance values Ri for the respective image elements of the printed products.
22. A process according to Claim 21, wherein the surface area of the respective image elements ranges from 25 to 400 mm2.
23. A process according to Claim 22, wherein the surface area of the respective image elements is approximately 1 cm2.
24. A process according to Claim 23, further comprising the step of dividing the image elements into subelements of approximately 0.25 to 25 mm2 in surface area.
25. A process according to Claim 24, wherein the image elements are divided into subelements of approximately 1 mm2.
26. A process according to Claim 24, further comprising the step of: determining a subreference reflectance value RSs for each subelement of an image element; and wherein the respective reference reflec-tance values Rs of the image elements are determined from all of the respective subreference reflectance values RSs.
27. A process according to Claim 26, wherein the reference reflectance value Rs is calculated by averaging the subreference reflectance values RSs.
28. A process according to Claim 27, further comprising the step of: assigning a sub-full tone weighting factor GSe to each subelement; and calculat-ing the full tone weighting factor Ge of an image ele-ment by averaging the sub-full tone weight factors GSe of the subelements of the respective image elements.
29. A process according to Claim 18, further comprising the steps of: for each printing ink, deter-mining a zone error value .DELTA.z from differences .DELTA.e between the actual reflectance values Ri and the refer-ence reflectance values Rs of the image elements belonging to the printing zone involved by integrating the differences .DELTA.e, weighted with the full tone weight-ing factor Ge)over the print zone; and determining the setting values for the ink feed elements from the zone error values .DELTA.z.
30. A process according to Claim 28, further comprising the steps of: for each printing ink, deter-mining a zone error value .DELTA.z from the differences .DELTA.e between the actual reflectance values Ri and the reference reflectance values Rs of the image elements E
belonging to the printing zone involved by integrating the differences .DELTA.e, weighted with the full tone weight-ing factor Ge)over the print zone; and determining the setting values for the ink feed elements from the zone error values .DELTA.z.
belonging to the printing zone involved by integrating the differences .DELTA.e, weighted with the full tone weight-ing factor Ge)over the print zone; and determining the setting values for the ink feed elements from the zone error values .DELTA.z.
31. An apparatus for the regulation of the ink feed controls in an offset printing machine, com-prising: a photoelectric scanning device for measuring a reference; a densitometric scanning device for measuring the printed products; and computing means, connected to at least one of the two scanning devices, for processing the measured values into setting values ST for the ink feed control elements of the printing machine and for outputting said values; wherein the scanning devices divide the reference and the print product into image elements and determine the surface coverage and the reflectance, respectively, for each printing ink in each image element; and wherein the computing means determines with respect to each print-ing ink for each image element of the reference, a reference reflectance value Rs from the measured sur-face coverages, taking into consideration at least one of such printing parameters as the print characteristic and the effect of full tone density, compares said reference value Rs with a respective measured actual reflectance value Ri of a corresponding image element of the printed product, and determines the setting values ST for the ink feed control elements from the results of said comparison.
32. An apparatus according to Claim 31, wherein the scanning device for the reference measures the reference with a higher resolution than that obtained when the scanning device for the print products measures the printed products.
33. An apparatus according to Claim 31, further comprising: display means for graphically displaying at least one of the following: the measured reflectances of the reference, the reference reflectance values calculated therefrom, the actual reflectance values of the printed products, and the respective differences between the reference and actual reflectance values.
34. An apparatus according to Claim 32 further comprising display means for graphically displaying at least one of the following: the measured reflectances of the reference, the reference reflec-tance values calculated therefrom, the actual reflectance values of the printed products, and the respective differences between the reference and actual reflectance values.
35. An offset printing machine, comprising: an apparatus for regulating ink feed controls in said offset printing machine, said apparatus further comprising a photoelectric scanning device for measuring a reference; a densitometric scanning device for measuring the printed products; and computing means, connected to at least one of the two scanning devices, for processing the measured values into setting values ST for the ink feed control elements of the printing machine and for outputting said values; wherein the scanning devices divide the reference and the print product into image elements and determine the surface coverage and the reflectance, respectively, for each printing ink in each image element; and wherein the computing means determines, with respect to each printing ink for each image element of the reference, a reference reflectance value Rs from the measured surface coverages, taking into consideration at least one of such printing parameters as printing characteristic and the effect of full tone density, compares said reference value Rs with a respective measured actual reflectance value Ri of a corresponding image element of the printed product, and determines the setting values ST for the ink feed control elements from the results of said comparison.
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CH5965/83-5 | 1983-11-04 | ||
| CH596583 | 1983-11-04 |
Publications (1)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| CA1217274A true CA1217274A (en) | 1987-01-27 |
Family
ID=4302229
Family Applications (2)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| CA000466914A Expired CA1217273A (en) | 1983-11-04 | 1984-11-02 | Process and apparatus for the evaluation of the printing quality of a printed product produced by an offset printing machine |
| CA000466921A Expired CA1217274A (en) | 1983-11-04 | 1984-11-02 | Process and apparatus for the regulation of ink feed controls in an offset printing machine |
Family Applications Before (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| CA000466914A Expired CA1217273A (en) | 1983-11-04 | 1984-11-02 | Process and apparatus for the evaluation of the printing quality of a printed product produced by an offset printing machine |
Country Status (11)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| US (2) | US4660159A (en) |
| EP (2) | EP0142469B1 (en) |
| JP (3) | JPS60176765A (en) |
| AT (2) | ATE31673T1 (en) |
| AU (2) | AU578431B2 (en) |
| CA (2) | CA1217273A (en) |
| DE (2) | DE3468367D1 (en) |
| DK (2) | DK159958C (en) |
| ES (2) | ES537314A0 (en) |
| NO (2) | NO163601C (en) |
| ZA (3) | ZA848572B (en) |
Families Citing this family (83)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ATE31673T1 (en) * | 1983-11-04 | 1988-01-15 | Gretag Ag | METHOD AND DEVICE FOR EVALUATION OF THE PRINTING QUALITY OF A PRINT PRODUCT PREFERABLY PRODUCED ON AN OFFSET PRINTING MACHINE AND OFFSET PRINTING MACHINE EQUIPPED WITH A CORRESPONDING DEVICE. |
| US4649502A (en) * | 1983-11-04 | 1987-03-10 | Gretag Aktiengesellschaft | Process and apparatus for evaluating printing quality and for regulating the ink feed controls in an offset printing machine |
| DE3483606D1 (en) * | 1983-12-19 | 1990-12-20 | Gretag Ag | METHOD, DEVICE AND COLOR MEASUREMENT STRIP FOR PRINT QUALITY ASSESSMENT. |
| JPS60250958A (en) * | 1984-05-29 | 1985-12-11 | Toppan Printing Co Ltd | Unit for setting reference information for inspection of printed matter |
| JPS60250957A (en) * | 1984-05-29 | 1985-12-11 | Toppan Printing Co Ltd | Unit for setting reference information for inspection of printed matter |
| DD253679A1 (en) * | 1986-11-13 | 1988-01-27 | Polygraph Leipzig | PROCESS FOR REGULATING COLOR DENSITY |
| DE3666554D1 (en) * | 1985-12-10 | 1989-11-30 | Heidelberger Druckmasch Ag | Process for controlling the application of colours in a printing machine, printing device equipped therewith and measuring device for such a printing device |
| US5182721A (en) * | 1985-12-10 | 1993-01-26 | Heidelberger Druckmaschinen Aktiengesellschaft | Process and apparatus for controlling the inking process in a printing machine |
| US4860226A (en) * | 1986-09-09 | 1989-08-22 | Martin Edward L | Method and apparatus for bar code graphics quality control |
| DE3631204C2 (en) * | 1986-09-13 | 1993-11-25 | Roland Man Druckmasch | Device on printing press for densitometric detection of a measuring field strip |
| US4947348A (en) * | 1987-03-25 | 1990-08-07 | Kollmorgen Corporation | Densitometer method and system for identifying and analyzing printed targets |
| FR2623905B1 (en) * | 1987-11-30 | 1992-02-14 | David Michel | APPARATUS FOR DETERMINING PAINT FORMULATION FOR BODY REPAIR |
| US4967379A (en) * | 1987-12-16 | 1990-10-30 | Gretag Aktiengesellschaft | Process for the ink control or regulation of a printing machine by comparing desired color to obtainable color data |
| EP0324718B1 (en) * | 1988-01-14 | 1992-07-08 | GRETAG Aktiengesellschaft | Method and device for ink monitoring in a printing machine |
| DE3804941A1 (en) * | 1988-02-17 | 1989-08-31 | Hell Rudolf Dr Ing Gmbh | METHOD AND DEVICE FOR DETECTING PRINT AREA COVERING DATA |
| DE3812099C2 (en) * | 1988-04-12 | 1995-01-26 | Heidelberger Druckmasch Ag | Process for color control of an offset printing press |
| JPH01310485A (en) * | 1988-06-08 | 1989-12-14 | Dainippon Printing Co Ltd | Defect information detecting device |
| US4959790A (en) * | 1988-06-28 | 1990-09-25 | F & S Corporation Of Columbus, Georgia | Apparatus and method for producing color corrected reproduction of colored original images |
| DD274786A1 (en) * | 1988-08-11 | 1990-01-03 | Adw Ddr Kybernetik Inf | METHOD AND ARRANGEMENT FOR MONITORING THE PRINT QUALITY OF MULTI-COLOR RASTER PRINTING TEMPLATES OF AN OFFSET PRINTING MACHINE |
| DD274787A1 (en) * | 1988-08-11 | 1990-01-03 | Adw Ddr Kybernetik Inf | METHOD AND ARRANGEMENT FOR DETERMINING THE FLUID COVERAGE OF PRIMARY COLORS IN MEASUREMENT SEGMENTS OF MULTICOLORED PRINTING TEMPLATES OF AN OFFSET PRINTING MACHINE |
| DE3903981C2 (en) * | 1989-02-10 | 1998-04-09 | Heidelberger Druckmasch Ag | Process for controlling ink filling in a printing press |
| DE3924989A1 (en) * | 1989-07-28 | 1991-02-07 | Roland Man Druckmasch | DEVICE FOR CARRYING OUT A COMPREHENSIVE QUALITY CONTROL ON PRINT SHEETS |
| CA2035666A1 (en) * | 1990-02-05 | 1991-08-06 | Ehud Spiegel | Apparatus and techniques for processing of data such as color images |
| DE4004056A1 (en) * | 1990-02-10 | 1991-08-14 | Roland Man Druckmasch | Inking control esp. for offset rotary printing machine - applies colour pattern corrections before addn. of values extracted by scanning system from original colour documents |
| JPH04226762A (en) * | 1990-12-28 | 1992-08-17 | Sannichi Insatsu:Kk | Printing managing method |
| EP0495563B2 (en) † | 1991-01-15 | 2004-09-29 | Creo IL.Ltd. | Apparatus and techniques for computerized printing |
| EP0505323B2 (en) * | 1991-03-21 | 2001-11-07 | Maschinenfabrik Wifag | Method of adjusting the screendot sizes of a rotary offset printing machine |
| DE4122794A1 (en) * | 1991-07-10 | 1993-01-14 | Roland Man Druckmasch | METHOD FOR MONITORING AND REGULATING THE PRINTING PROCESS, ESPECIALLY ON OFFSET PRINTING MACHINES |
| DE4142481A1 (en) * | 1991-08-12 | 1993-02-18 | Koenig & Bauer Ag | QUALITY CONTROL OF AN IMAGE, FOR example A PRINTED PATTERN |
| US5317425A (en) * | 1992-02-10 | 1994-05-31 | Eastman Kodak Company | Technique for use in conjunction with an imaging system for providing an appearance match between two images and for calibrating the system thereto |
| US5224421A (en) * | 1992-04-28 | 1993-07-06 | Heidelberg Harris, Inc. | Method for color adjustment and control in a printing press |
| DE4229267A1 (en) * | 1992-09-02 | 1994-03-03 | Roland Man Druckmasch | Method for controlling the printing process on an autotypically operating printing machine, in particular sheet-fed offset printing machine |
| US5357448A (en) * | 1993-02-02 | 1994-10-18 | Quad/Tech, Inc. | Method and apparatus for controlling the printing of an image having a plurality of printed colors |
| FI95888C (en) * | 1993-04-26 | 1996-04-10 | Valtion Teknillinen | Printing quality control procedure |
| JPH0724444A (en) * | 1993-05-28 | 1995-01-27 | Kubo Gijutsu Jimusho:Kk | Tourmaline carrier-containing adapter and cartridge for mounting on shower |
| DE4321177A1 (en) * | 1993-06-25 | 1995-01-05 | Heidelberger Druckmasch Ag | Device for parallel image inspection and color control on a printed product |
| CA2107431A1 (en) * | 1993-09-30 | 1995-03-31 | Arthur L. Rosbottom | Process and apparatus for colour data evaluation |
| DE4335350A1 (en) * | 1993-10-16 | 1995-04-20 | Heidelberger Druckmasch Ag | Process and device for determining register deviations in multicolour printed products produced in a printing machine |
| DE4335351C2 (en) * | 1993-10-16 | 2003-04-30 | Heidelberger Druckmasch Ag | Method and device for compensating register deviations in an offset rotary printing machine |
| DE4431270C2 (en) * | 1993-10-21 | 1997-01-16 | Roland Man Druckmasch | Process for controlling the ink flow of an autotypically working printing machine |
| US5816164A (en) * | 1994-04-20 | 1998-10-06 | Heidelberger Druckmaschinen Ag | Method and apparatus for monitoring image formation on a printing form |
| US5812705A (en) * | 1995-02-28 | 1998-09-22 | Goss Graphic Systems, Inc. | Device for automatically aligning a production copy image with a reference copy image in a printing press control system |
| DE19515499C2 (en) * | 1995-04-27 | 1997-03-06 | Heidelberger Druckmasch Ag | Process for simultaneous multi-color control during printing |
| DE19533822A1 (en) * | 1995-09-13 | 1997-03-20 | Heidelberger Druckmasch Ag | Process for regulating the coloring when printing with a printing press |
| EP0765748A3 (en) * | 1995-09-29 | 1997-08-13 | Goss Graphics Systems Inc | Device for alignment of images in a control system for a printing press |
| US5903712A (en) * | 1995-10-05 | 1999-05-11 | Goss Graphic Systems, Inc. | Ink separation device for printing press ink feed control |
| DE19645005A1 (en) * | 1995-11-01 | 1997-05-07 | Samsung Electronics Co Ltd | Determining colour temperature colour display arrangement e.g. CRT, LCD |
| US5818453A (en) * | 1996-01-05 | 1998-10-06 | Weavexx Corporation | System for evaluating print quality for a sheet |
| IT1284432B1 (en) * | 1996-03-22 | 1998-05-21 | De La Rue Giori Sa | PROCEDURE FOR AUTOMATIC CHECK OF THE PRINT QUALITY OF A POLYCHROME IMAGE |
| DE19617016A1 (en) * | 1996-04-27 | 1997-11-27 | Thomas Fuchs | Procedure for controlling colour rendering of offset printer |
| JP3042193U (en) * | 1996-06-07 | 1997-10-14 | 東洋ブラシ工業株式会社 | Iostone toothbrush |
| DE19632969C2 (en) | 1996-08-16 | 1999-04-29 | Roland Man Druckmasch | Method for determining standard values for the production of multicolored printed copies on a printing press |
| US6024020A (en) * | 1996-08-21 | 2000-02-15 | Agfa Corporation | Fluorescence dot area meter for measuring the halftone dot area on a printing plate |
| DE19701967C2 (en) * | 1997-01-22 | 1999-08-05 | Andreas Paul | Process for determining the color appearance and corresponding device |
| DE19703129B4 (en) * | 1997-01-29 | 2014-08-21 | Heidelberger Druckmaschinen Ag | Method for evaluating the quality of a printed image produced in multicolor printing on a substrate |
| US5791249A (en) * | 1997-03-27 | 1998-08-11 | Quad/Tech, Inc. | System and method for regulating dampening fluid in a printing press |
| US5967049A (en) * | 1997-05-05 | 1999-10-19 | Quad/Tech, Inc. | Ink key control in a printing press including lateral ink spread, ink saturation, and back-flow compensation |
| US6318260B1 (en) | 1997-05-05 | 2001-11-20 | Quad/Tech, Inc. | Ink key control in a printing press including lateral ink spread, ink saturation, and back-flow compensation |
| DE19749063A1 (en) * | 1997-11-06 | 1999-05-12 | Heidelberger Druckmasch Ag | Process for achieving color measurements for ink printers |
| DE19749064A1 (en) * | 1997-11-06 | 1999-05-12 | Heidelberger Druckmasch Ag | Method for determining color value gradients |
| DE19802920B4 (en) | 1998-01-27 | 2008-01-31 | Man Roland Druckmaschinen Ag | Method and device for color control in printing machines |
| JPH11286099A (en) * | 1998-04-02 | 1999-10-19 | Think Lab Kk | Method for calculating usage of ink |
| US5967050A (en) * | 1998-10-02 | 1999-10-19 | Quad/Tech, Inc. | Markless color control in a printing press |
| DE29916379U1 (en) * | 1999-09-17 | 1999-12-09 | Roland Man Druckmasch | Device for the densitometric measurement of printed products |
| US6564714B2 (en) * | 2000-12-06 | 2003-05-20 | Delaware Capital Formation, Inc. | Spectral color control method |
| PL200158B1 (en) | 2000-12-06 | 2008-12-31 | Avt Advanced Vision Technology | Spectral color control method |
| JP2002192700A (en) * | 2000-12-26 | 2002-07-10 | Dainippon Screen Mfg Co Ltd | Print controller and recording medium |
| CA2439819A1 (en) * | 2001-03-02 | 2002-09-12 | The Ackley Martinez Company Dba Mgi Studio | Printing adjustment system and method |
| US6832552B2 (en) * | 2001-06-26 | 2004-12-21 | Creo Inc. | Method of automated setting of imaging and processing parameters |
| JP3943873B2 (en) * | 2001-07-26 | 2007-07-11 | 大日本スクリーン製造株式会社 | Ink and water supply amount control device in printing machine and printing system provided with the same |
| US6725772B2 (en) | 2001-07-30 | 2004-04-27 | Ackley Martinez Company | System admixture compensation system and method |
| WO2003011598A1 (en) * | 2001-07-30 | 2003-02-13 | The Ackley Martinez Company Dba Mgi Studio | Color management processing system and method |
| DE10245702A1 (en) | 2001-10-25 | 2003-05-08 | Heidelberger Druckmasch Ag | Method for matching ink supply of a printer to the physical characteristics of the ink being used, whereby a computer print control model is used that incorporates the physical properties of the ink being used |
| JP4803944B2 (en) | 2002-07-19 | 2011-10-26 | 大日本スクリーン製造株式会社 | Printed matter measuring method and printed matter measuring apparatus |
| US6810813B2 (en) * | 2003-03-14 | 2004-11-02 | Heidelberger Druckmaschinen Ag | Device and method for controlling registration in a printing press |
| EP1512531A1 (en) | 2003-09-02 | 2005-03-09 | Abb Research Ltd. | Inking control system for printing machines |
| DE102004021599A1 (en) * | 2004-05-03 | 2005-12-01 | Gretag-Macbeth Ag | Method for determining color and / or density values and printing devices designed for the method |
| US7605959B2 (en) | 2005-01-05 | 2009-10-20 | The Ackley Martinez Company | System and method of color image transformation |
| US20060170996A1 (en) * | 2005-02-02 | 2006-08-03 | Steven Headley | Color control of a web printing press utilizing intra-image color measurements |
| DE102006014657B4 (en) * | 2006-03-28 | 2008-11-20 | Koenig & Bauer Aktiengesellschaft | Method for color control of a printing press |
| WO2011053323A1 (en) * | 2009-10-30 | 2011-05-05 | Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. | Calibrated reflection densitometer |
| EP2439071A1 (en) * | 2010-10-11 | 2012-04-11 | KBA-NotaSys SA | Color control pattern for the optical measurement of colors printed on a sheet-like or web-like substrate by means of a multicolor printing press and uses thereof |
| RU2468922C2 (en) * | 2011-02-22 | 2012-12-10 | Государственное Образовательное Учреждение Высшего Профессионального Образования "Омский Государственный Технический Университет" | Method to select components of printing system for optimal colour rendition in multicolour printing |
Family Cites Families (26)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US2968988A (en) | 1955-03-18 | 1961-01-24 | Crosfield J F Ltd | Apparatus for indicating changes in ink |
| US3185088A (en) | 1961-12-01 | 1965-05-25 | Harris Intertype Corp | Method and apparatus for predetermining settings for ink fountain keys |
| US3322025A (en) * | 1962-05-17 | 1967-05-30 | William C Dauser | Color control method |
| US3376426A (en) | 1966-11-04 | 1968-04-02 | Hurletron Inc | Color detection apparatus for multiple color printing |
| CH538680A (en) | 1971-11-03 | 1973-06-30 | Gretag Ag | Method and device for the automatic measurement of the color density of printing inks applied to a moving web, in particular in multi-color gravure printing |
| US3835777A (en) | 1973-01-16 | 1974-09-17 | Harris Intertype Corp | Ink density control system |
| US3958509A (en) * | 1974-06-13 | 1976-05-25 | Harris Corporation | Image scan and ink control system |
| US4210078A (en) * | 1974-06-24 | 1980-07-01 | M.A.N.-Roland Druckmaschinen Aktiengesellschaft | Apparatus for use on printing presses to insure optimum color density and to assist in making corrective adjustment |
| US3995958A (en) * | 1975-07-21 | 1976-12-07 | Hallmark Cards, Incorporated | Automatic densitometer and method of color control in multi-color printing |
| US4003660A (en) | 1975-12-03 | 1977-01-18 | Hunter Associates Laboratory, Inc. | Sensing head assembly for multi-color printing press on-line densitometer |
| CH609795A5 (en) | 1976-04-30 | 1979-03-15 | Gretag Ag | |
| DE2727426B2 (en) * | 1977-06-18 | 1981-04-30 | Heidelberger Druckmaschinen Ag, 6900 Heidelberg | Device for controlling the ink supply of a sheet-fed offset printing machine |
| DE2747527A1 (en) * | 1977-10-22 | 1979-04-26 | Agfa Gevaert Ag | METHOD AND DEVICE FOR DETERMINING THE QUANTITIES OF COPY LIGHT WHEN COPYING COLOR DOCUMENTS |
| US4183657A (en) * | 1978-04-10 | 1980-01-15 | International Business Machines Corporation | Dynamic reference for an image quality control system |
| US4210818A (en) * | 1978-06-07 | 1980-07-01 | Harris Corporation | Apparatus for determining image areas for printing |
| DE2947054A1 (en) * | 1979-11-22 | 1981-05-27 | Reinhard Mohn GmbH, 4830 Gütersloh | METHOD AND DEVICE FOR DETERMINING SET POINTS FOR THE PARTICULAR AUTOMATIC PRESET OF PRINTING MACHINES |
| DE2950606A1 (en) * | 1979-12-15 | 1981-06-19 | M.A.N.- Roland Druckmaschinen AG, 6050 Offenbach | DEVICE FOR ZONE-WAY OPTOELECTRONIC MEASUREMENT OF THE AREA COVERAGE OF A PRINT ORIGINAL |
| DE3024773A1 (en) * | 1980-06-30 | 1982-01-28 | Grapho-Metronic Meß- und Regeltechnik GmbH & Co, KG, 8000 München | METHOD AND DEVICE FOR CONTROLLING AND CONTROLLING THE COLORING OF A MULTICOLOR PRINTING MACHINE |
| US4505589A (en) * | 1981-04-03 | 1985-03-19 | Gretag Aktiengesellschaft | Process and apparatus for the colorimetric analysis of printed material |
| JPS57208422A (en) * | 1981-06-18 | 1982-12-21 | Fuji Photo Film Co Ltd | Hue judging device |
| US4512662A (en) * | 1981-07-06 | 1985-04-23 | Tobias Philip E | Plate scanner for printing plates |
| GB2115145B (en) * | 1981-07-29 | 1986-05-29 | Dainippon Printing Co Ltd | Method and device for inspecting printed matter |
| JPS58105007A (en) * | 1981-12-17 | 1983-06-22 | Toshiba Corp | Measuring device for picture area |
| DE3220800C2 (en) * | 1982-06-03 | 1986-10-30 | M.A.N.- Roland Druckmaschinen AG, 6050 Offenbach | Device for scanning printing plates |
| US4553033A (en) * | 1983-08-24 | 1985-11-12 | Xerox Corporation | Infrared reflectance densitometer |
| ATE31673T1 (en) * | 1983-11-04 | 1988-01-15 | Gretag Ag | METHOD AND DEVICE FOR EVALUATION OF THE PRINTING QUALITY OF A PRINT PRODUCT PREFERABLY PRODUCED ON AN OFFSET PRINTING MACHINE AND OFFSET PRINTING MACHINE EQUIPPED WITH A CORRESPONDING DEVICE. |
-
1984
- 1984-10-29 AT AT84810523T patent/ATE31673T1/en not_active IP Right Cessation
- 1984-10-29 EP EP84810522A patent/EP0142469B1/en not_active Expired
- 1984-10-29 EP EP84810523A patent/EP0142470B1/en not_active Expired
- 1984-10-29 AT AT84810522T patent/ATE29434T1/en not_active IP Right Cessation
- 1984-10-29 US US06/665,975 patent/US4660159A/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 1984-10-29 US US06/665,976 patent/US4665496A/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
- 1984-10-29 DE DE8484810523T patent/DE3468367D1/en not_active Expired
- 1984-10-29 DE DE8484810522T patent/DE3465930D1/en not_active Expired
- 1984-11-02 NO NO84844368A patent/NO163601C/en unknown
- 1984-11-02 ZA ZA848572A patent/ZA848572B/en unknown
- 1984-11-02 DK DK522184A patent/DK159958C/en not_active IP Right Cessation
- 1984-11-02 AU AU34966/84A patent/AU578431B2/en not_active Ceased
- 1984-11-02 CA CA000466914A patent/CA1217273A/en not_active Expired
- 1984-11-02 ES ES537314A patent/ES537314A0/en active Granted
- 1984-11-02 DK DK522284A patent/DK159959C/en not_active IP Right Cessation
- 1984-11-02 ZA ZA848574A patent/ZA848574B/en unknown
- 1984-11-02 CA CA000466921A patent/CA1217274A/en not_active Expired
- 1984-11-02 NO NO844369A patent/NO163602C/en unknown
- 1984-11-02 ES ES537316A patent/ES8600625A1/en not_active Expired
- 1984-11-02 ZA ZA848573A patent/ZA848573B/en unknown
- 1984-11-02 AU AU34967/84A patent/AU577068B2/en not_active Ceased
- 1984-11-05 JP JP59231473A patent/JPS60176765A/en active Granted
- 1984-11-05 JP JP59231472A patent/JPS60114728A/en active Granted
- 1984-11-05 JP JP59231471A patent/JPS60110451A/en active Granted
Also Published As
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| CA1217274A (en) | Process and apparatus for the regulation of ink feed controls in an offset printing machine | |
| EP1437222B1 (en) | Printing method, printed matter, and printing controller | |
| US4649502A (en) | Process and apparatus for evaluating printing quality and for regulating the ink feed controls in an offset printing machine | |
| JP2895404B2 (en) | Ink supply control method for halftone gradation printing press | |
| EP0884180B1 (en) | Process for controlling or regulating operations carried out by a printing machine | |
| US4947746A (en) | Print control strip | |
| US4881181A (en) | Process for the determination of controlled variables for the inking unit of printing presses | |
| US6373964B1 (en) | Method for image inspection and color guidance for printing products of a printing press | |
| US6446555B1 (en) | Apparatus for the densitometry measurement of printed products | |
| US5791251A (en) | Method of regulating ink-feeding or inking in printing | |
| US5551342A (en) | Method for controlling the ink guidance in a printing machine | |
| US7000544B2 (en) | Measurement and regulation of inking in web printing | |
| US6611357B2 (en) | Method of stipulating values for use in the control of a printing machine | |
| US5602970A (en) | Process for setting the halftone dot sizes for a rotary offset printing machine | |
| US4878753A (en) | Method for measuring double print offset in printing systems | |
| JPH06219034A (en) | Method of controlling printing process | |
| US5816164A (en) | Method and apparatus for monitoring image formation on a printing form | |
| US6012390A (en) | Method for controlling the inking of a printing press by determining color value gradients | |
| US5673112A (en) | Method for detecting color contamination | |
| JPH07304161A (en) | Method for determining allowable fluctuation range for controlling or adjusting application of ink in printing press | |
| CA1130410A (en) | Test method for evaluating faults on printed sheets and webs | |
| JPH07104939B2 (en) | Printing effect measuring device | |
| Spiridonov et al. | Determination of the Deviations Tolerances of the Process-Colour Solids from the OK Print in Offset Printing Method | |
| Smith | Analysis of color variation during four-color offset lithographic press runs by monitoring changes in three-filter density values of overprint tints | |
| Lake | An investigation into the interactions of certain visual attributes of a four-color reproduction produced on a sheet-fed offset lithographic printing press |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| MKEX | Expiry |