CA1260381A - Supercritical fluid molecular spray film deposition and powder formation - Google Patents
Supercritical fluid molecular spray film deposition and powder formationInfo
- Publication number
- CA1260381A CA1260381A CA000461977A CA461977A CA1260381A CA 1260381 A CA1260381 A CA 1260381A CA 000461977 A CA000461977 A CA 000461977A CA 461977 A CA461977 A CA 461977A CA 1260381 A CA1260381 A CA 1260381A
- Authority
- CA
- Canada
- Prior art keywords
- pressure
- solute
- orifice
- region
- fluid
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Expired
Links
- 239000000843 powder Substances 0.000 title claims abstract description 61
- 230000015572 biosynthetic process Effects 0.000 title abstract description 39
- 238000001084 supercritical spray deposition Methods 0.000 title abstract description 3
- 239000012530 fluid Substances 0.000 claims abstract description 83
- 238000000151 deposition Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 62
- 230000008021 deposition Effects 0.000 claims abstract description 55
- 239000010408 film Substances 0.000 claims abstract description 52
- 239000007789 gas Substances 0.000 claims abstract description 46
- 239000002904 solvent Substances 0.000 claims abstract description 44
- 239000007921 spray Substances 0.000 claims abstract description 31
- 239000010409 thin film Substances 0.000 claims abstract description 25
- 238000010899 nucleation Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 19
- 230000006911 nucleation Effects 0.000 claims abstract description 19
- 239000011343 solid material Substances 0.000 claims abstract description 15
- 239000007787 solid Substances 0.000 claims abstract description 8
- 230000003993 interaction Effects 0.000 claims abstract description 5
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 claims description 107
- 239000000243 solution Substances 0.000 claims description 38
- 239000000463 material Substances 0.000 claims description 21
- 238000010438 heat treatment Methods 0.000 claims description 8
- 239000002245 particle Substances 0.000 claims description 8
- 238000012546 transfer Methods 0.000 claims description 8
- 230000035939 shock Effects 0.000 claims description 5
- 238000004519 manufacturing process Methods 0.000 claims description 4
- 208000036366 Sensation of pressure Diseases 0.000 claims description 3
- 230000007423 decrease Effects 0.000 claims description 3
- 238000005086 pumping Methods 0.000 claims description 2
- 230000007704 transition Effects 0.000 claims description 2
- 238000007599 discharging Methods 0.000 claims 4
- 206010013710 Drug interaction Diseases 0.000 claims 1
- 238000004891 communication Methods 0.000 claims 1
- 230000003247 decreasing effect Effects 0.000 claims 1
- 239000000758 substrate Substances 0.000 abstract description 19
- 230000008569 process Effects 0.000 description 51
- 238000005755 formation reaction Methods 0.000 description 37
- VYPSYNLAJGMNEJ-UHFFFAOYSA-N Silicium dioxide Chemical compound O=[Si]=O VYPSYNLAJGMNEJ-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 33
- 229940090044 injection Drugs 0.000 description 18
- 238000002347 injection Methods 0.000 description 18
- 239000007924 injection Substances 0.000 description 18
- 239000007788 liquid Substances 0.000 description 18
- 239000000377 silicon dioxide Substances 0.000 description 15
- 150000001875 compounds Chemical class 0.000 description 10
- 238000005516 engineering process Methods 0.000 description 10
- 238000013459 approach Methods 0.000 description 9
- 239000000523 sample Substances 0.000 description 9
- 239000000126 substance Substances 0.000 description 9
- 230000008901 benefit Effects 0.000 description 8
- 238000013461 design Methods 0.000 description 8
- 239000004793 Polystyrene Substances 0.000 description 6
- 238000002663 nebulization Methods 0.000 description 6
- 229920002223 polystyrene Polymers 0.000 description 6
- 238000005345 coagulation Methods 0.000 description 5
- 230000015271 coagulation Effects 0.000 description 5
- 239000012535 impurity Substances 0.000 description 5
- 235000012239 silicon dioxide Nutrition 0.000 description 5
- 238000000427 thin-film deposition Methods 0.000 description 5
- 238000005229 chemical vapour deposition Methods 0.000 description 4
- 238000000576 coating method Methods 0.000 description 4
- 238000009826 distribution Methods 0.000 description 4
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 description 4
- 235000019580 granularity Nutrition 0.000 description 4
- NBVXSUQYWXRMNV-UHFFFAOYSA-N monofluoromethane Natural products FC NBVXSUQYWXRMNV-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 4
- 238000009740 moulding (composite fabrication) Methods 0.000 description 4
- BASFCYQUMIYNBI-UHFFFAOYSA-N platinum Chemical compound [Pt] BASFCYQUMIYNBI-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 4
- 239000000047 product Substances 0.000 description 4
- 241000894007 species Species 0.000 description 4
- XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N water Substances O XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 4
- UHOVQNZJYSORNB-UHFFFAOYSA-N Benzene Chemical compound C1=CC=CC=C1 UHOVQNZJYSORNB-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 3
- OKKJLVBELUTLKV-UHFFFAOYSA-N Methanol Chemical compound OC OKKJLVBELUTLKV-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 3
- YXFVVABEGXRONW-UHFFFAOYSA-N Toluene Chemical compound CC1=CC=CC=C1 YXFVVABEGXRONW-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 3
- 238000004458 analytical method Methods 0.000 description 3
- 230000006399 behavior Effects 0.000 description 3
- 230000008859 change Effects 0.000 description 3
- 238000011161 development Methods 0.000 description 3
- 230000018109 developmental process Effects 0.000 description 3
- 239000010410 layer Substances 0.000 description 3
- 239000003921 oil Substances 0.000 description 3
- 150000002894 organic compounds Chemical class 0.000 description 3
- 230000000704 physical effect Effects 0.000 description 3
- 238000004544 sputter deposition Methods 0.000 description 3
- CXWXQJXEFPUFDZ-UHFFFAOYSA-N tetralin Chemical compound C1=CC=C2CCCCC2=C1 CXWXQJXEFPUFDZ-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 3
- PAYRUJLWNCNPSJ-UHFFFAOYSA-N Aniline Chemical compound NC1=CC=CC=C1 PAYRUJLWNCNPSJ-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- IJGRMHOSHXDMSA-UHFFFAOYSA-N Atomic nitrogen Chemical compound N#N IJGRMHOSHXDMSA-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- LFQSCWFLJHTTHZ-UHFFFAOYSA-N Ethanol Chemical compound CCO LFQSCWFLJHTTHZ-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- CTQNGGLPUBDAKN-UHFFFAOYSA-N O-Xylene Chemical group CC1=CC=CC=C1C CTQNGGLPUBDAKN-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- OFBQJSOFQDEBGM-UHFFFAOYSA-N Pentane Chemical compound CCCCC OFBQJSOFQDEBGM-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- ATUOYWHBWRKTHZ-UHFFFAOYSA-N Propane Chemical compound CCC ATUOYWHBWRKTHZ-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- JUJWROOIHBZHMG-UHFFFAOYSA-N Pyridine Chemical compound C1=CC=NC=C1 JUJWROOIHBZHMG-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 238000005054 agglomeration Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000002776 aggregation Effects 0.000 description 2
- 239000003054 catalyst Substances 0.000 description 2
- 238000009833 condensation Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000005494 condensation Effects 0.000 description 2
- 239000000356 contaminant Substances 0.000 description 2
- HPXRVTGHNJAIIH-UHFFFAOYSA-N cyclohexanol Chemical compound OC1CCCCC1 HPXRVTGHNJAIIH-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- NNBZCPXTIHJBJL-UHFFFAOYSA-N decalin Chemical compound C1CCCC2CCCCC21 NNBZCPXTIHJBJL-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 230000001419 dependent effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000009792 diffusion process Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000004836 empirical method Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000001704 evaporation Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000008020 evaporation Effects 0.000 description 2
- 239000005350 fused silica glass Substances 0.000 description 2
- 239000011521 glass Substances 0.000 description 2
- RLSSMJSEOOYNOY-UHFFFAOYSA-N m-cresol Chemical compound CC1=CC=CC(O)=C1 RLSSMJSEOOYNOY-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 229910052751 metal Inorganic materials 0.000 description 2
- 239000002184 metal Substances 0.000 description 2
- 150000002739 metals Chemical class 0.000 description 2
- VNWKTOKETHGBQD-UHFFFAOYSA-N methane Chemical compound C VNWKTOKETHGBQD-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 239000000203 mixture Substances 0.000 description 2
- 229910052697 platinum Inorganic materials 0.000 description 2
- 229920000642 polymer Polymers 0.000 description 2
- 238000001556 precipitation Methods 0.000 description 2
- 239000002243 precursor Substances 0.000 description 2
- 229920006395 saturated elastomer Polymers 0.000 description 2
- 229960001866 silicon dioxide Drugs 0.000 description 2
- 238000005507 spraying Methods 0.000 description 2
- 229910001220 stainless steel Inorganic materials 0.000 description 2
- 239000010935 stainless steel Substances 0.000 description 2
- 238000007736 thin film deposition technique Methods 0.000 description 2
- OTMSDBZUPAUEDD-UHFFFAOYSA-N Ethane Chemical compound CC OTMSDBZUPAUEDD-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- VGGSQFUCUMXWEO-UHFFFAOYSA-N Ethene Chemical compound C=C VGGSQFUCUMXWEO-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 239000005977 Ethylene Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000005033 Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000004642 Polyimide Substances 0.000 description 1
- ATJFFYVFTNAWJD-UHFFFAOYSA-N Tin Chemical compound [Sn] ATJFFYVFTNAWJD-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- YRKCREAYFQTBPV-UHFFFAOYSA-N acetylacetone Chemical compound CC(=O)CC(C)=O YRKCREAYFQTBPV-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 230000006978 adaptation Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000007792 addition Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000012790 adhesive layer Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000009835 boiling Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000004364 calculation method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000002925 chemical effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- AFYPFACVUDMOHA-UHFFFAOYSA-N chlorotrifluoromethane Chemical compound FC(F)(F)Cl AFYPFACVUDMOHA-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 239000002131 composite material Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000010276 construction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000001816 cooling Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000007797 corrosion Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000005260 corrosion Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000002788 crimping Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000011557 critical solution Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000006378 damage Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000000354 decomposition reaction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000005553 drilling Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000002451 electron ionisation mass spectrometry Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000002474 experimental method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000000605 extraction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000010419 fine particle Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000009878 intermolecular interaction Effects 0.000 description 1
- 150000002500 ions Chemical class 0.000 description 1
- 229910052741 iridium Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 230000000873 masking effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000004949 mass spectrometry Methods 0.000 description 1
- -1 mercury Chemical class 0.000 description 1
- QSHDDOUJBYECFT-UHFFFAOYSA-N mercury Chemical compound [Hg] QSHDDOUJBYECFT-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 229910052753 mercury Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 238000012986 modification Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000004048 modification Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000003607 modifier Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229910052757 nitrogen Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 229940078552 o-xylene Drugs 0.000 description 1
- 239000000382 optic material Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000011368 organic material Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000002688 persistence Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000005240 physical vapour deposition Methods 0.000 description 1
- 229920001721 polyimide Polymers 0.000 description 1
- 229920006254 polymer film Polymers 0.000 description 1
- 239000002244 precipitate Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000012545 processing Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000002035 prolonged effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000001737 promoting effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000001294 propane Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000011241 protective layer Substances 0.000 description 1
- UMJSCPRVCHMLSP-UHFFFAOYSA-N pyridine Natural products COC1=CC=CN=C1 UMJSCPRVCHMLSP-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 238000000197 pyrolysis Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000009257 reactivity Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000009467 reduction Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000005476 soldering Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000003381 solubilizing effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000007614 solvation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000004611 spectroscopical analysis Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000009718 spray deposition Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000002311 subsequent effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000004808 supercritical fluid chromatography Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000000194 supercritical-fluid extraction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000002344 surface layer Substances 0.000 description 1
- PXXNTAGJWPJAGM-UHFFFAOYSA-N vertaline Natural products C1C2C=3C=C(OC)C(OC)=CC=3OC(C=C3)=CC=C3CCC(=O)OC1CC1N2CCCC1 PXXNTAGJWPJAGM-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 230000035899 viability Effects 0.000 description 1
Classifications
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B05—SPRAYING OR ATOMISING IN GENERAL; APPLYING FLUENT MATERIALS TO SURFACES, IN GENERAL
- B05B—SPRAYING APPARATUS; ATOMISING APPARATUS; NOZZLES
- B05B7/00—Spraying apparatus for discharge of liquids or other fluent materials from two or more sources, e.g. of liquid and air, of powder and gas
- B05B7/14—Spraying apparatus for discharge of liquids or other fluent materials from two or more sources, e.g. of liquid and air, of powder and gas designed for spraying particulate materials
- B05B7/1481—Spray pistols or apparatus for discharging particulate material
- B05B7/1486—Spray pistols or apparatus for discharging particulate material for spraying particulate material in dry state
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B05—SPRAYING OR ATOMISING IN GENERAL; APPLYING FLUENT MATERIALS TO SURFACES, IN GENERAL
- B05D—PROCESSES FOR APPLYING FLUENT MATERIALS TO SURFACES, IN GENERAL
- B05D1/00—Processes for applying liquids or other fluent materials
- B05D1/02—Processes for applying liquids or other fluent materials performed by spraying
- B05D1/025—Processes for applying liquids or other fluent materials performed by spraying using gas close to its critical state
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B05—SPRAYING OR ATOMISING IN GENERAL; APPLYING FLUENT MATERIALS TO SURFACES, IN GENERAL
- B05D—PROCESSES FOR APPLYING FLUENT MATERIALS TO SURFACES, IN GENERAL
- B05D2401/00—Form of the coating product, e.g. solution, water dispersion, powders or the like
- B05D2401/90—Form of the coating product, e.g. solution, water dispersion, powders or the like at least one component of the composition being in supercritical state or close to supercritical state
Landscapes
- Physical Or Chemical Processes And Apparatus (AREA)
- Inorganic Compounds Of Heavy Metals (AREA)
- Manufacturing Of Micro-Capsules (AREA)
Abstract
SUPERCRITICAL FLUID MOLECULAR SPRAY FILM
DEPOSITION AND POWDER FORMATION
ABSTRACT OF THE DISCLOSURE
Solid films are deposited, or fine powders formed, by dissolving a solid material into a super-critical fluid solution at an elevated pressure and then rapidly expanding the solution through a short orifice into a region of relatively low pressure. This produces a molecular spray which is directed against a substrate to deposit a solid thin film thereon, or discharged into a collection chamber to collect a fine powder. Upon expansion and supersonic interaction with background gases in the low pressure region, any clusters of sol-vent are broken up and the solvent is vaporized and pumped away. Solute concentration in the solution is varied primarily by varying solution pressure to determine, together with flow rate, the rate of deposi-tion and to control in part whether a film or powder is produced and the granularity of each. Solvent cluster-ing and solute nucleation are controlled by manipulating the rate of expansion of the solution and the pressure of the lower pressure region. Solution and low pressure region temperatures are also controlled.
DEPOSITION AND POWDER FORMATION
ABSTRACT OF THE DISCLOSURE
Solid films are deposited, or fine powders formed, by dissolving a solid material into a super-critical fluid solution at an elevated pressure and then rapidly expanding the solution through a short orifice into a region of relatively low pressure. This produces a molecular spray which is directed against a substrate to deposit a solid thin film thereon, or discharged into a collection chamber to collect a fine powder. Upon expansion and supersonic interaction with background gases in the low pressure region, any clusters of sol-vent are broken up and the solvent is vaporized and pumped away. Solute concentration in the solution is varied primarily by varying solution pressure to determine, together with flow rate, the rate of deposi-tion and to control in part whether a film or powder is produced and the granularity of each. Solvent cluster-ing and solute nucleation are controlled by manipulating the rate of expansion of the solution and the pressure of the lower pressure region. Solution and low pressure region temperatures are also controlled.
Description
~Z~381 SUPERCRITICAL FLUID MOLECULAR SPRAY FILM
DEPOSITION AND POWDER FO~ATION
BACKG~OUND OF THE INVENTION
This invention relates to deposition and powder formation methods and more particularly to thin film deposition and fine powder formation methods.
Thin films and methods for their formation are of crucial importance to the development of many new technologies. Thin films of less than about one micro-meter (um) thickness down to those approaching mono-molecular layers, cannot be made by conventional liquid spraying techniques. Liquid spray coatings are typical-ly more than an order of magnitude thicker than true thin films. Such techniques are also limited to deposi-tion of liquid-soluble substances and subject to prob-lems inherent in removal of the liquid solvent.
There are many existing technologies for thin films deposition, including physical and chemical vapor deposition, plasma pyrolysis and sputtering. Collec-tively, these techniques are usable to produce thinfilms of many materials for a wide variety of applica-tions, but it is still impossible to generate suitable thin films of many materials, particularly for thermally labile organic and polymeric materials. Some of these known techniques enable deposition of thin films having physical and chemical qualities, such as molecular homo-geneity, which are unattainable by liquid spray tech-niques. Existing thin film technologies are often also inadequate for many applications due to high power requirements, low deposition rates, limi-tations upon substrate temperature, or the complexity and expense of deposition equipment. Hence, such techniques cannot be used economically to produce thick films or coatings having the same qualities as thin films. Also, most known thin film deposition techniques are mutually in-compatible.
~i' :~2~38~
Accordingly, a need remains for a new surface deposition technique, which has the potential of allow-ing deposition of thin films not previously possible, with distinct advantages compared to existing thin film technologies.
Similar problems and a similar need exists in the formation of fine powders. Highly homegeneous and very fine powders, such as made by plasma processing, are very energy intensive and therefore expensive to make.
SUMMARY OF I'HE INVENTION
One object of this invention is to enable deposition of very high- as well as low-molecular weight solid thin films or formation of powders thereof.
A second object is to deposit films or form fine powders of thermally-labile compounds.
A third object of the invention is to deposit thin films having a highly homogeneous microstructure.
Another object is to reduce the cost and com-plexity of apparatus for depositing thin films or form-ing powders.
A further object is to enable rapid deposition of coatings having thin film qualities.
Another object is the formation of fine powders having a narrow size distribution, and to enable control of their physical and chemical properties as a function of their detailed structure.
An additional object is the formation of fine powders with structures appropriate for use as selective chemical catalysts.
Yet another object is to enable deposition without excessively heating or having to cool or heat the substrate to enable deposition.
An additional object is -to enable deposition of 35 non-equilibrium materials.
The invention is a new technique for depositing thin films and forming fine powders utilizing a super-~2~3 !3~
critical fluid injection molecular spray (FIMS~. Thetechnique involves the rapid expansion of a pressurized supercritical fluid (dense gas) solution containing the solid material or solute to be deposited into a low pressure region. This is done in such a manner that a "molecular spray" of individual molecules (atoms) or very small clusters of the solute are produced, which may then be deposited as a film on any given substrate or, by promoting molecular nucleation or clustering, as a fine powder. The range of potential application of this new surface deposition and powder formation tech-nology is very broad.
The technique appears applicable to any mate-rial which can be dissolved in a supercritical fluid.
In the context of this invention, the term "supercriti-cal" relates to dense gas solutions with enhanced solva-tion powers, and can include near supercritical fluids.
While the ultimate limits of application are unknown, it includes most polymers, organic compounds, and many in-organic materials (using, for example, supercriticalwater as the solvent). Polymers of more than one million molecular weight can be dissolved in supercriti-cal fluids. Thin films and powders can therefore be produced for a wide range of organic, polymeric, and thermally labile materials which are impossible to pro-duce with existing technologies. This technique also provides the basis for improved and considerably more economical methods for forming powders or depositing surface layers of a nearly unlimited range of materials on any substrate and at any desired thickness.
The FIMS film deposition and powder formation processes are useful for many potential applications and can provide significant advantages over prior tech-niques. For example, in the electro-optic materials area, improved methods of producing thin organic and polymer films are needed and are made possible by this invention. The process also appears to be useful for ~.26~3~l the development of resistive layers (such as polyimides) for advanced microchip development. These techniques can provide the basis for thin film deposition of mate-rials for use in molecular scale electronic devices where high quality films of near molecular thicknesses will be required for the ultimate step in miniaturiza-tion. This approach also provides a method for deposi-tion of thin films of conductive organic compounds as well as the formation of thin protective layers. A wide range of applications exist for deposition of improved coatings for UV and corrosion protection, and layers with various specialized properties. Many additional potential applications could be listed. Similarly, FIMS
powder formation techniques can be used for formation of more selective catalysts or new composite and low densi-ty materials with a wide range of applications.
It is believed that this process will have sub-stantial utility in space manufacturing applications, particularly using the high-vacuum, low-gravity condi-tions thereof. In space, this process would produce perfectly symmetric powders. ~pplications in space as well as on earth include deposition of surface coatings of a wide range of characteristics, and deposition of very thin adhesive layers for bonding and construction.
There are three fundamental aspects to the FIMS
film deposition and powder formation process. The first aspect pertains to supercritical fluid solubility.
~riefly, many solid materials of interest are soluble in supercritical fluid solutions that are substantially insoluble in liquids or gases. Forming a supercritical solution can be accomplished either of two ways: dis-solving a solute or appropriate precursor chemicals into a supercritical fluid or dissolving same in a liquid and pressuring and heating the solution to a supercritical 35 state. In accordance with the invention, the super-critical solution parameters--temperature, pressure, and solute concentration--are varied to control rate of ~Z~03~
deposition and molecular nucleation or clustering of the solute.
The second important aspect is the fluid injec-tion molecular spray or FIMS process itself. rrhe injec-tion process involves numerous parameters which affectsolvent cluster formation during expansion, and a subse-quent solvent cluster "break-up" phenomenon in a Mach disc which results from free jet or supersonic expansion of the solution. Such parameters include expansion flow rate, orifice dimensions, expansion region pressures and solvent-solute interactions at reduced pressures, the kinetics of gas phase nucleation processes, cluster size and lifetime, substrate conditions, and the energy con-tent and reactivity of the "nonvolatile" molecules which have been transferred to the gas phase by the FIMS
process. Several of these parameters are varied in accordance with the invention to control solvent clustering and to limit or promote nucleation of the solute molecules selectively to deposit films or to form powders, respectively, and to vary granularity and other characteristics of the films or powders.
The third aspect of the invention pertains to the conditions of the substrate during the thin film deposition process. Briefly, all of the techniques presently available to the deposition art can be used in conjunction with this process. In addition, a wide variety of heretofor unavailable physical film charac-teristics can be obtained by varying the solution and fluid injection parameters in combination with substrate conditions.
The potential major advantages of the FIMS thin film deposition technique compared to conventional tech-nologies such as sputtering and chemical vapor deposi-tion (CVD) include:
- Economic operation (compared to sputtering).
- A wide range of readily controlled deposi-tion rates.
- Operation from high vacuum to atmospheric 12~138~
pressures.
- Independence from substrate conditions (such as temperature) allowing improved control over film characteristics.
- Deposition of organic and polymeric mate-rials in thin films not possible by existing technologies.
- Possible adaptation to small portable deposition devices for exotic applications.
Similar advantages arise from the FIMS powder formation method, in particular the ability to generate ultra fine powders, highly uniform size distributions, and uniform or amorphous chemical and physical proper-ties.
The foregoing and other objects, features and advantages of the invention will become more readily apparent from the following detailed description, which proceeds with reference to the accompanying drawings.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF T~E DRAWINGS
Fig. 1 is a graph of a typical pressure-density behavior for a compound in the critical region in terms of reduced parameters.
Fig. 2 is a graph of typical trends for solu-bilities of solids in supercritical fluids as a function of temperature and pressure.
Fig. 3 is a graph of the solubility of silicon dioxide (SiO2) in subcritical and supercritical water at various pressures.
Fig. 4 is a simplified schematic of apparatus for supercritical fluid injection molecular spray deposition of thin films on a substrate or formation of powders in accordance with the invention.
Figs. 5 and 5a are enlarged cross sectional views of two different forms of supercritical fluid injectors used in the apparatus of Fig. 4.
Fig. ~ is a schematic illustration of the fluid injection molecular spray process illustrating the interaction of the supercritical fluid spray with the ~6038~
low pressure region into which it is injected.
Fig. 7 is a photomicrograph showing four dif-ferent examples of supercritical fluid injection molecu-lar spray-deposited silica surfaces in accordance with the invention.
Fig. 8 is a low magnification photomicrograph of three examples of supercritical fluid injection mo-lecular spray-formed silica particles or powders in accordance with the invention.
Fig. 9 is a ten times magnification photomicro-graph of the subject matter of Fig. 8.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
The immediately following sections describe, in turn, the relevant aspects of supercritical fluid behav-ior, the FIMS process, and film deposition and powderformation using the process. These are followed by descriptions of apparatus used in the process and exam-ples of the process and the resultant products. Various background references are cited parenthetically in this description, are listed in the appended bibliography and are incorporated by reference herein to further explain to practitioners of the thin film deposition and powder formation arts certain details of the present invention with which they presently are not ordinarily familiar.
Solubilities in Supercritical Fluids The primary requirement for the Fluid Injection Molecular Spray (FIMS) technique is that the material to be deposited (or a suitable precursor) be soluble in a supercritical fluid. Subsequently in the process, the supercritical fluid or solvent is one which substantial-ly vaporizes into a gas upon expansion from the super-critical state, enabling removal from the vicinity of deposition.
Because of its importance to the FIMS powder and film deposition technique, and the present lack of solubility data for many substances of interest, a brief 38:~l discussion of relevant supercritical fluid phenomena is warranted.
At high pressures above the critical point the resulting fluid or "dense gas" will attain densities approaching those of a liquid (with increased inter-molecular interactions) and will assume some of the properties of a liquid. The supercritical fluid extrac-tion (1) and supercritical fluid chromatography (2) methods utilize the variable but readily controlled properties characteristic of a supercritical fluid.
These properties are dependent upon the fluid composi-tion, temperature, and pressureO
The compressibility of supercritical gases is great, just above the critical temperature where small changes in pressure result in large changes in the den-sity of the supercritical fluid (3)O Fig. 1 shows a typical pressure-density relationship in terms of reduced parameters (e.g., pressure, temperature or den-sity divided by the corresponding variable at the criti-cal point, which are given for a number of compounds inTable 1). Isotherms for various reduced temperatures show the variations in density which can be expected with changes in pressure. The "liquid-likel' behavior of a supercritical fluid at higher pressures results in greatly enhanced solubilizing capabilities compared to those of the "subcritical" gas, with higher diffusion coefficients and an extended useful temperature range compared to liquids. Compounds of high molecular weight can often be dissolved in the supercritical phase at relatively low temperatures; and the solubility of species up to 1,800,000 molecular weight has been demon-strated for polystyrene (4).
An interesting phenomenon associated with supercritical fluids is the occurrence of a "threshold pressure" for solubility of a high molecular weight solute (5). As the pressure is increased, the solu-bility of the solute will often increase by many orders of magnitude with only a small pressure increase (2).
Thus, the threshold pressure is the pressure (for a given temperature) at which the solubility of a compound increases greatly (i.e., becomes detectable). Examples of a few compounds which can be used as supercritical solvents are given in Table 1.
EXAMPLES OF SUPERCRITICAL SOLVENTS
Critical 10 Boiling Critical Critical Density Point Temperature Pressure 3 Compound( c? ( c) (atm) (g/cm ) C2 - 78.5a 31.3 72.9 0.448 NH3 - 33.35 132.4 112.5 0.235 15 H2O 100.00 374.15 218.3 0.315 N2O - 88.56 36.5 71.7 0.45 Methane -164.00 - 82.1 45.8 0.2 Ethane - 88.63 32.28 48.1 0.203 Ethylene -103.7 9.21 49.7 0.218 20 Propane - 42.1 96.67 41.9 0.217 Pentane 36.1 196.6 33.3 0.232 Benzene 80.1 288.9 48.3 0.302 Methanol 64.7 240.5 78.9 0.272 Ethanol 78.5 243.0 63.0 0.276 25 Isopropanol82.5 235.3 47.0 0.273 Isobutanol108.0 275.0 42.4 0.272 Chlorotrifluoro-methane 31.2 28.0 38.7 0.579 Monofluoromethane 78.4 44.6 58.0 0.3 30 Toluene 110.6 320.0 40.6 0.292 Pyridine 115.5 347.0 55.6 0.312 Cyclohexane80.74 280.0 40.2 0.273 m-Cresol 202.2 433.0 45.0 0.346 Decalin 195.65 391.0 25.8 0.254 35 Cyclohexanol155.65356.0 38.0 0.273 o-Xylene 144.4 357.0 35.0 0.284 Tetralin 207.57 446.0 34.7 0.309 Aniline 184.13 426.0 52.4 0.34 Near supercritical liquids demonstrate solu-bility characteristics and other pertinent properties similar to those of supercritical ~luids. The solute may be a liquid at the supercritical temperatures, even though it is a solid at lower temperatures. In addi-tion, it has been demonstrated that fluid "modifiers"
can often alter supercritical fluid properties signifi-cantly, even in relatively low concentrations, greatly increasing solubility for some compounds. These varia-tions are considered to be within the concept of asupercritical fluid as used in the context of this invention.
The fluid phase solubility of higher molecular weight and more polar materials is a necessary pre-requisite for many potentially important E'IMS applica-tions. Unfortunately, the present state of theoretical prediction of fluid phase solubilities is inadequate to serve as a reliable guide to fluid selection. Various approaches to solubility prediction have been suggested or employed. Some of these approaches have been reviewed by Irani and Funk (6). The rigorous theoreti-cal approach is to use the virial equation of-state and calculate the necessary virial coefficients using statistical mechanics. However, the virial equa-tion-of-state does not converge as the critical density is approached (6). Since its application is generally limited to densities of less than half the critical den-sity, it is inadequate for FIMS conditionsO Consequent-ly, at higher solvent densities, an empirical or semi-empirical equation-of-state must be employed.
While both equations-of-state and lattice gas models have been applied to fit supercritical fluid solubility data (7-14), this approach at present is of limited value for polar components and larger organic compounds (15,16).
An alternative approach which uses the more empirically derived solubility parameters can be modi-fied to be an appropriate guide for fluid selection (17,18). This approach has the advantage of simplicity, but necessarily involves approximations due to an inade-quate treatment of density-dependent entropy effects, pressure-volume effects, and other approximations in-herent in solution theory, as well as failures such as those noted for the theoretical methods. ~ore recent approaches, designed to take into consideration the range of attractive forces, have utilized multidimen-sional solubility parameters which are evaluated by more empirical methods (19). In contrast to liquids, the solubility parameter of a supercritical fluid is not a constant value, but is approximately proportional to the gas density. In general, two fluid components are con-sidered likely to be mutually soluble if the component solubility parameters agree to within + 1 (cal/cm3).
However, actual supercritical fluid solubilities are usually less than predicted (18). The solubility para-meter may be divided into two terms related to "chemical effects" and intermolecular forces (17,18). This approach predicts a minimum density below which the solute is not soluble in the fluid phase (the "threshold pressure"). It also suggests that the solubility para-meter will have a maximum value as density is increased if sufficiently high solubility parameters can be obtained. This phenomenon has been observed for several compounds in very high pressure studies (18).
The typical range of variation of the solu-bility of a solid solute in a supercritical fluid sol-vent as a function of temperature and pressure is illustrated in a simplified manner in Fig. 2. l'he solute typically exhibits a threshold fluid pressure 35 above which solubility increases significantly. The region of maximum increase in solubility has been pre-dicted to be near the critical pressure where the change in density is greatest with pressure (see Fig. 1)(20).
In contrast, where volatility of the solute is low and at lower fluid pressures, increasing the temperature will typically decrease solubility as fluid density decreases. However, as with many liquids, "solubility"
may again increase at sufficiently high temperatures, where the solute vapor pressure may also become signifi-cant. Thus, while the highest supercritical fluid den-sities at a given pressure are obtained near the criti-cal temperature, higher solubilities may be obtained atslightly lower fluid densities but higher temperatures.
While there is little data concerning the solu-bility of many materials relevant to FIMS film deposi-tion, some systems have been extensively investigated due to their importance in other fields of technology.
As an example, Figure 3 gives solubility data for sili-con dioxide (SiO2) in subcritical and supercritical water (21~, illustrating the variation in solubility with pressure and temperature. The variation in solu-bility with pressure provides a method for both removalor reduction in impurities, as well as simple control of FIMS deposition rate. Other possible fluid systems include those with chemically-reducing properties, or metals, such as mercury, which are appropriate as sol-vents for metals and other solutes which have extremelylow vapor pressures. Therefore, an important aspect of the invention is the utilization of the increased super-critical fluid solubilities of solid materials for FIMS
film deposition and powder formation.
Fluid Injection Molecular Spray The fundamental basis of the FIMS surface deposition and powder formation process involves a fluid expansion technique in which the net effect is to trans-fer a solid material dissolved in a supercritical fluid to the gas phase at low (i.e. atmospheric or sub-atmos-pheric) pressures, under conditions where it typically has a negligible vapor pressure. I'his process utilizes ~L2~3~
a fluid injection technique which calls for rapidly expanding the supercritical solution through a short orifice into a relatively lower pressure region, i.e.
one of approximately atmospheric or sub-atmospheric pressures. This technique is akin to an injection process, the concept of which I recently developed, for - direct analysis of supercritical fluids by mass spec-trometry (22-26). However, it differs from the spec-trometry application in that the latter is limited to expansion into regions of well-defined pressure of about 1 torr., very low flow rates--less than about 100 micro-liters/min.--and very dilute solute concentrations, and injection into an ion plasma, rather than an energetic-ally passive low-pressure region. An understanding of the physical and chemical phenomena during the FIMS
process is vital to the deposition of films and forma-tion of films with desirable properties.
The design of the FIMS orifice (or pressure restrictor) is a critical factor in overall perform-ance. The FIMS apparatus should be simple, easily main-tained and capable of prolonged operation without fail-ure (e.g., plugging of the restrictor). Additionally, the FIMS process for thin film applications must be designed to provide for control of solute clustering or nucleation, minimization of solvent clusters, and to eliminate or reduce the condensation or decomposition of nonvolatile or thermally labile compounds. Similarly, solute clustering, nucleation and coagulation are utilized to control the formation of fine powders using the FIMS process. The ideal restrictor or orifice allows the entire pressure drop to occur in a single rapid step so as to avoid the precipitation of nonvola-tile material at the orifice. Proper design of the FIMS
injector, discussed hereinafter, allows a rapid expan-sion of the supercritical solution, avoiding theliquid-to-gas phase transition.
33~3~
The unique characteristics of the FIMS process, as contrasted to deposition by liquid spray or nebuliza-tion, center about the direct fluid injection process.
In liquid nebulization the bulk of the spray is initial-ly present as droplets of about micron size or larger.Droplets of this size present the problem of providing sufficient heat to evaporate the solvent. This is im-practical in nearly all cases. Thus spray and nebuliza-tion methods are not true thin film techniques since relatively large particles or agglomerations of mole-cules actually impact the surface. These same charac-teristics also enable the production of much finer pow-ders using FIMS than are practical by techniques not involving gas phase particle growth.
Additional advantages result from the much higher volatility of many supercritical fluids compared to liquid spray or nebulization techniques. This allows the solvent to be readily pumped away or removed since there is little tendency to accumulate on the surface.
Typical conditions in the liquid spray or nebulization techniques result in extensive cluster formation and persistence of a jet of frozen droplets into the low pressure discharge region. A characteristic of the FIMS
process is that, during fluid injection, there is no visible jet formation once the critical temperature has been exceeded.
Thermodynamic considerations for an isentropic expansion, such as the FIMS process, lead one to expect less than a few percent of the solvent to be initially present as clusters. Proper control of conditions dur-ing the FIMS process results in an extremely short life-time for these small clusters. Solvent clusters are rapidly reduced in size due to both evaporation and by the heating process due to the Mach disk shock front, 35 described below. Clusters or small particles of the "solute" can be avoided by having sufficiently dilute supercritical solutions, operating in a temperature range above the critical temperature for the solvent, and expanding under conditions which minimize the extent oE nucleation or agglomeration. On the other hand, small solute particle or powder formation can be maxi-mized by having high solute concentrations and injectionflow rates leading to both clusters with large numbers of solute molecules and increased gas phase nucleation and coagulation processes. The latter conditions can produce a fine powder, having a relatively narrow size distribution, with many applications in materials tech-nologies.
An improved understanding of the FIMS process may be gained by consideration of solvent cluster forma-tion phenomena during isentropic expansion of a high pressure jet 100 through a nozzle 102, as illustrated schematically in Figure 6. The expansion through the FIMS orifice 102 is related to the fluid pressure (Pf), the pressure in the expansion region (Pv), and other parameters involving the nature of the gas, tem-perature, and the design of orifice 102. When an expan-sion occurs in a low pressure region or chamber 104 with a finite background pressure (Pv), the expanding gas in jet 100 will interact with the background gas produc-ing a shock wave system. This includes barrel and reflected shock waves 110 as well as a shock wave 112 (the Mach disk) perpendicular to the jet axis 114. lhe Mach disk is created by the interaction of the super-sonic jet llO and the background gases of region 104.
It is characterized by partial destruction of the directed jet and a transfer of collisional energy resulting in a redistribution of the directed kinetic energy of the jet among the various translational, vibrational and rotational modes. ~hus, the Mach disk serves to heat and break up the solvent clusters formed 35 during the expansion process. Experimentally, it has been o~served that the extent of solvent cluster forma-tion drops rapidly as pressure in the expansion region ~038~
is increased. This pressure change moves the Mach disk closer to the nozzle, curtailing clustering vf the sol-vent.
The distance from the orifice to the Mach disk may be estimated from experimental work (27,28) as 0.67 D(Pf/PV)l/2, where D is the orifice diameter.
Thus, for typical conditions where Pf = 400 atm, Pv = 1 torr and D = 1 um the distance to the ~ach disk is 0.4 mm. Accordingly, it is necessary to have sufficient background gas in the low pressure region to limit clustering of the solvent so that the solvent is not included in the film or powder. This constraint is met in any practical enc~osed vacuum system.
The solvent clusters formed during the expan-sion of a dense gas result from adiabatic cooling infirst stages of the expansion process. The extent of cluster formation is related to the fluid pressure, tem-perature, and the orifice dimensions. Theoretical methods for prediction of the precise extent of cluster formation are still inadequate. However, an empirical method of "corresponding ]ets" has been developed (27) which uses scaled parameters, and has been successfully employed. Randall and Wahrhaftig (28) have applied this method to the expansion of supercritical CO2 and obtained the following empirical equation:
N = 6 X 1011 x Plf 44 x D0.86 x T~s 4 for Pf in torr, T in K, D in mm and where N is the average number of molecules in a cluster and T is the supercritical fluid temperature. For the typical con-ditions noted above this leads to an average clustersize of approximately 1.6 x 103 molecules at 100C or a droplet diameter of about 30 A. For a solute present in a 1.0 mole percent supercritical fluid solution, this corresponds to a solute cluster size of 16 molecules after loss or evaporation of the solvent (gas) mole-cules, assuming all solute molecules remain associated.
For the laser drilled FIMS orifice, the dimensions are ~038~
such that we expect somewhat of a delay in condensation resulting in a faster expansion and less clustering than calculated. More conventional nozzles or longer orifice designs would enhance solvent cluster formation.
Thus, the average clusters formed in the FIMS
expansion process are more than 10~ to 109 less mas-sive than the droplets formed in li~uid spray and nebulization methods. The small clusters formed in the FIMS process are expected to be rapidly broken up in or after the Mach disk due to the energy transfer process described above. The overall result of the FI~S process is to produce a gas spray or a spray of extremely small clusters incorporating the nonvolatile solute mole-culesO This conclusion is supported by our mass spec-trometric observations which show no evidence of cluster formation in any of the supercritical systems studied to date t23,24).
Thus, the foregoing details of the FIMS process are relevant to the injector design, performance, and lifetime, as well as to the characteristics of the molecular spray and the extent of clustering or coagula-tion. The initial solvent clustering phenomena and any subsequent gas phase solute nucleation processes, are also directly relevant to film and powder characteris-tics as described hereinafter.Film Deposition and Powder Formation The FIMS process is the basis of this new thin film deposition and powder formation technique. The FIMS process allows the transfer of nominally nonvola-tile species to the gas phase, from which deposition isexpected to occur with high efficiency upon available sur~aces.
However, while the FIMS process determines the rate of transfer to the gas phase, both the gas phase and substrate conditions have an effect upon the result-ing film. The powder formation process also depends on both the FIMS process and the kinetics of the various ~ ~'6(~
- gas phase processes which promote particle growth. The major gas phase processes include possible association with solvent molecules and possible nucleation of the film species (if the supercritical fluid concentration is sufficiently large). Important variable substrate parameters include distance from the FIMS injector, sur-face characteristics of the substrate, and temperature.
Deposition efficiency also depends in varying degrees upon surface characteristics, pressure, translational energy associated with the molecular spray, and the nature of the particular species being deposited.
Apparatus The viability of the FIMS concept for film deposition and powder formation has been demonstrated by the use of the apparatus shown in Figs. 4, 5, and 5a.
The supercritical fluid apparatus 210 utilizes a Varian 8500 high-pressure syringe pump 212 (8000 psi maximum pressure) and a constant-temperature oven 214 and trans-fer line 216. An expansion chamber 218 is equipped with a pressure monitor in the form of a thermocouple gauge 220 and is pumped using a 10 cfm mechanical pump 222. A
liquid nitrogen trap (not shown) is used to prevent most pump oil from back streaming (however, the films pro-duced did show impurities in several instances due to the presence of a fluorocarbon contaminant and trace impurities due to the pump oil and high quality films free of such impurities should utilize either improved pumping devices or a significant flow of "clean" gas to prevent back diffusion of pump oils). l'he initial con-figuration also required manual removal of a flange forsample substrate 224 placement prior to flange closure and chamber evacuation. '~he procedure is reversed for sample removal. Again an improved system would allow for masking of the substrate until the start of the 35 desired exposure period, and would include interlocks for sample introduction ancl removal. In addition, means (not shown) for substrate heating and sample movement 3~3~
(e.g., rotation) are also desirable for control of deposition conditions and to improve deposition rates (and film thicknesses) over large substrate areas. In addition, for certain powder or film products, it is appropriate to operate under ambient atmospheric condi-tions, thus greatly reducing the complexity of the necessary equipment. For ambient pressure deposition, one would simply need to maintain gas flow to remove the gas (solvent).
Operation under the high vacuum conditions in space would allow desirable conditions for both the pow-der and thin films processes since the gas phase solvent is rapidly removed. In addition, the gravity-free con-ditions available in space would allow the formation of fine particles having highly symmetric physical proper-ties. In addition, any FIMS process system would bene-fit from a number of FIMS injectors operating in tandem to produce more uniform production of powders or films or to inject different materials to produce powder and films of variable chemical composition.
Several FIMS probes have been designed and tested in this process. One design, illustrated in Figure 5, consists of a heated probe 226 (maintained at the same temperature as the oven and transfer line) and a pressure restrictor consisting of a laser drilled orifice in a 50 to 250 um thick stainless steel disc 228. A small tin gasket is used to make a tight seal between the probe tip and the pressure restrictor, resulting in a dead volume estimated to be on the order of 0.01 uL. Good results have been obtained with laser drilled orifices in u~ 250 um (.25 mm) thick stainless steel. The orifice is typically in the 1-4 um diameter size range although this range is primarily determined by the desired flow rate. Larger orifices may be used and, for similar solute concentrations, will increase the extent of nucleation during the FIMS expansion. The actual orifice dimensions are variable due to the laser drilling process. A second design (Fig. 5a) of probe 226a is similar to that of Fig. 5, but terminates in a capillary restriction obtained, for example, by care-fully crimping the terminal 0.1-0.5 mm of platinum-irid-ium tubing 230. This design provides the desired flowrate as well as an effectively zero dead volume, but more sporadic success than the laser-drilled orifice.
Another restrictor (not shown) is made by soldering a short length (c~ 1 cm) of tubing having a very small inside diameter (c~ 5 um for a small system but poten-tially much larger for large scale film deposition or high powder formation rates) inside of tubing with a much larger inside diameter so that it acts as an ori-fice or nozzle.
The important point is to enable the injection process to be sufficiently fast so that material has insufficient time to precipitate and plug the orifice.
Thus a 10 cm length of 10 um I.D. tubing plugs vary rapidly--the pressure drops along the capillary and at some point the solute precipitates and collects, ulti-mately plugging the tube. It is important to minimize any precipitation by making the pressure drop as rapid as possible. A simple calculation shows that the fluid moves through a short 100 um restriction in C 10 6 seconds.
Very concentrated (saturated) solutions can also be handled with reduced probability of plugging by adjusting the conditions in the probe so that the solvating power of the fluid is increased just before injection. This can be done in many cases by simply operating at a slightly lower or higher temperature, where the solubility is larger, and depending upon pres-sure as indicated in Fig. 2.
Examples The two systems chosen for demonstration involved deposition of polystyrene films on platinum and fused silica, and deposition of silica on platinum and ~ ~n.~
glass. The supercritical solution for polystyrene involved a 0.1% solution in a pentane -2~ cyclohexanol solution. Supercritical water containing ~ 0.02% SiO2 was used for the silica deposition. In both cases the substrate was at ambient temperatures and the deposition pressure was typically approximately 1 torr, although some experiments described hereinafter were conducted under atmospheric pressure. The films produced ranged from having a nearly featureless and apparently amor-phous s~ructure to those with a distinct crystallinestructure. It should be noted that, as in chemical vapor deposition, control over film characteris-tics--amorphous, polycrystalline and even epitaxial in some instances--is obtained by control of the substrate surface and temperature). Relatively even deposition was obtained over the small surfaces (~ 4 cm2).
Fourier transform infrared analysis of the polystyrene films on fused silica (not shown) did not show detectable amounts of the cyclohexanol solvent.
However, the silica films did show evidence of fluoro-carbon impurities possibly due to the sample cell.
Analysis of the films indicated a thickness of approxi-mately 0.5 um for polystyrene and 2800 A for silica for five minute deposition periods. Much greater or smaller formation rates can be obtained by adjustment of para-meters noted previously and the use of multiple FIMS
in~ectors.
These limited studies also indicated that more concentrated solutions with long distances to the deposition surface could result in substantial nuclea-tion and coagulation for some materials. For example, for silica, it was possible to generate an extremely fine powder having a complex structure and an average particle size ~ 0.1 um. Using a saturated polystyrene solution produced particles (not shown) as large as 0.3 um with an extremely narrow size distribution.
~6~1381 The range of surface structures produced for the silica deposition studies show an even wider range of surface characteristics. Figure 7 gives scanning electron photomicrographs obtained for silica film deposition on glass surfaces under the range of condi-tions listed in Table 2 below.
Solute: Silica Solvent: Water Expansion region at ambient 10 temperature for 5-10 minutes exposed.
Supercritical E'luid FIMS Conditions Silica Conc.
Est.
15 from Solu-bility Pressure Film Data Temp (atm)Flow Rate Pressure A 0.01% 450C 400 atm40 uL/min 0.5 torr B 0.02% 400C 450 atm 40-70 uL/min 0.5 torr C 0.04% 490C 400 atm150 uL/min 0.6 torr D* 0.04% 450C 400 atm250 uL/min 0.9 torr Powder A 0.02~ 520C 450 atm100 uL~min 1 atm (760 torr) B* 0.05% 450C 400 atm90 uL/min 0.5 torr C 0.04% 450C 400 atm300 uL/min 1.2 torr *Contained flurocarbon contaminant The photomicrographs show that the deposited films range from relatively smooth and uniform (Figs. 7A and 7B) to complex and having a large surface area (Figs. 7C and 7D). Similarly, Figs. 8 and 9 show powders produ~ed under conditions where nucleation and coagulation are increased. It should be noted that different FIMS
restrictors were utilized for these examples. The resulting products are not expected to be precisely ~6~3~3~
reproducible but are representative of the range of films or powders which can be produced using the EIMS
process. In addition, different solutes would be expected to change the physical properties of the resulting films and powders.
In general, high injection or flow rates pro-duce a more granular film surface or larger powder sizes, as do higher solute concentrations, and higher expansion chamber pressures. To a certain extent, orifice length and shape will also affect granularity.
The deposition rate also increases as the product of solute concentration and the flow rate increase. Solute concentration is a more important determinant of granu-larity than flow rate. Therefore, to alter granularity it is preferable to vary the solute concentration and to alter deposition rate it is preferable to vary flow rate.
Having illustrated and described the principles of my invention in two embodiments, with a number of examples illustrating variations thereof, it should be apparent to those skilled in the art that the invention can be modified in arrangement and detail without departing from such principles. Accordingly, I claim all modifications coming within the spirit and scope of the following claims.
38~
REFERENCES
1. Schneider, G. M., E. Stahl and G. Wilke, editors. 1980. "Extraction with Supercritical Gases," Verlag Chemie, Deerfield Beach, Floriaa.
DEPOSITION AND POWDER FO~ATION
BACKG~OUND OF THE INVENTION
This invention relates to deposition and powder formation methods and more particularly to thin film deposition and fine powder formation methods.
Thin films and methods for their formation are of crucial importance to the development of many new technologies. Thin films of less than about one micro-meter (um) thickness down to those approaching mono-molecular layers, cannot be made by conventional liquid spraying techniques. Liquid spray coatings are typical-ly more than an order of magnitude thicker than true thin films. Such techniques are also limited to deposi-tion of liquid-soluble substances and subject to prob-lems inherent in removal of the liquid solvent.
There are many existing technologies for thin films deposition, including physical and chemical vapor deposition, plasma pyrolysis and sputtering. Collec-tively, these techniques are usable to produce thinfilms of many materials for a wide variety of applica-tions, but it is still impossible to generate suitable thin films of many materials, particularly for thermally labile organic and polymeric materials. Some of these known techniques enable deposition of thin films having physical and chemical qualities, such as molecular homo-geneity, which are unattainable by liquid spray tech-niques. Existing thin film technologies are often also inadequate for many applications due to high power requirements, low deposition rates, limi-tations upon substrate temperature, or the complexity and expense of deposition equipment. Hence, such techniques cannot be used economically to produce thick films or coatings having the same qualities as thin films. Also, most known thin film deposition techniques are mutually in-compatible.
~i' :~2~38~
Accordingly, a need remains for a new surface deposition technique, which has the potential of allow-ing deposition of thin films not previously possible, with distinct advantages compared to existing thin film technologies.
Similar problems and a similar need exists in the formation of fine powders. Highly homegeneous and very fine powders, such as made by plasma processing, are very energy intensive and therefore expensive to make.
SUMMARY OF I'HE INVENTION
One object of this invention is to enable deposition of very high- as well as low-molecular weight solid thin films or formation of powders thereof.
A second object is to deposit films or form fine powders of thermally-labile compounds.
A third object of the invention is to deposit thin films having a highly homogeneous microstructure.
Another object is to reduce the cost and com-plexity of apparatus for depositing thin films or form-ing powders.
A further object is to enable rapid deposition of coatings having thin film qualities.
Another object is the formation of fine powders having a narrow size distribution, and to enable control of their physical and chemical properties as a function of their detailed structure.
An additional object is the formation of fine powders with structures appropriate for use as selective chemical catalysts.
Yet another object is to enable deposition without excessively heating or having to cool or heat the substrate to enable deposition.
An additional object is -to enable deposition of 35 non-equilibrium materials.
The invention is a new technique for depositing thin films and forming fine powders utilizing a super-~2~3 !3~
critical fluid injection molecular spray (FIMS~. Thetechnique involves the rapid expansion of a pressurized supercritical fluid (dense gas) solution containing the solid material or solute to be deposited into a low pressure region. This is done in such a manner that a "molecular spray" of individual molecules (atoms) or very small clusters of the solute are produced, which may then be deposited as a film on any given substrate or, by promoting molecular nucleation or clustering, as a fine powder. The range of potential application of this new surface deposition and powder formation tech-nology is very broad.
The technique appears applicable to any mate-rial which can be dissolved in a supercritical fluid.
In the context of this invention, the term "supercriti-cal" relates to dense gas solutions with enhanced solva-tion powers, and can include near supercritical fluids.
While the ultimate limits of application are unknown, it includes most polymers, organic compounds, and many in-organic materials (using, for example, supercriticalwater as the solvent). Polymers of more than one million molecular weight can be dissolved in supercriti-cal fluids. Thin films and powders can therefore be produced for a wide range of organic, polymeric, and thermally labile materials which are impossible to pro-duce with existing technologies. This technique also provides the basis for improved and considerably more economical methods for forming powders or depositing surface layers of a nearly unlimited range of materials on any substrate and at any desired thickness.
The FIMS film deposition and powder formation processes are useful for many potential applications and can provide significant advantages over prior tech-niques. For example, in the electro-optic materials area, improved methods of producing thin organic and polymer films are needed and are made possible by this invention. The process also appears to be useful for ~.26~3~l the development of resistive layers (such as polyimides) for advanced microchip development. These techniques can provide the basis for thin film deposition of mate-rials for use in molecular scale electronic devices where high quality films of near molecular thicknesses will be required for the ultimate step in miniaturiza-tion. This approach also provides a method for deposi-tion of thin films of conductive organic compounds as well as the formation of thin protective layers. A wide range of applications exist for deposition of improved coatings for UV and corrosion protection, and layers with various specialized properties. Many additional potential applications could be listed. Similarly, FIMS
powder formation techniques can be used for formation of more selective catalysts or new composite and low densi-ty materials with a wide range of applications.
It is believed that this process will have sub-stantial utility in space manufacturing applications, particularly using the high-vacuum, low-gravity condi-tions thereof. In space, this process would produce perfectly symmetric powders. ~pplications in space as well as on earth include deposition of surface coatings of a wide range of characteristics, and deposition of very thin adhesive layers for bonding and construction.
There are three fundamental aspects to the FIMS
film deposition and powder formation process. The first aspect pertains to supercritical fluid solubility.
~riefly, many solid materials of interest are soluble in supercritical fluid solutions that are substantially insoluble in liquids or gases. Forming a supercritical solution can be accomplished either of two ways: dis-solving a solute or appropriate precursor chemicals into a supercritical fluid or dissolving same in a liquid and pressuring and heating the solution to a supercritical 35 state. In accordance with the invention, the super-critical solution parameters--temperature, pressure, and solute concentration--are varied to control rate of ~Z~03~
deposition and molecular nucleation or clustering of the solute.
The second important aspect is the fluid injec-tion molecular spray or FIMS process itself. rrhe injec-tion process involves numerous parameters which affectsolvent cluster formation during expansion, and a subse-quent solvent cluster "break-up" phenomenon in a Mach disc which results from free jet or supersonic expansion of the solution. Such parameters include expansion flow rate, orifice dimensions, expansion region pressures and solvent-solute interactions at reduced pressures, the kinetics of gas phase nucleation processes, cluster size and lifetime, substrate conditions, and the energy con-tent and reactivity of the "nonvolatile" molecules which have been transferred to the gas phase by the FIMS
process. Several of these parameters are varied in accordance with the invention to control solvent clustering and to limit or promote nucleation of the solute molecules selectively to deposit films or to form powders, respectively, and to vary granularity and other characteristics of the films or powders.
The third aspect of the invention pertains to the conditions of the substrate during the thin film deposition process. Briefly, all of the techniques presently available to the deposition art can be used in conjunction with this process. In addition, a wide variety of heretofor unavailable physical film charac-teristics can be obtained by varying the solution and fluid injection parameters in combination with substrate conditions.
The potential major advantages of the FIMS thin film deposition technique compared to conventional tech-nologies such as sputtering and chemical vapor deposi-tion (CVD) include:
- Economic operation (compared to sputtering).
- A wide range of readily controlled deposi-tion rates.
- Operation from high vacuum to atmospheric 12~138~
pressures.
- Independence from substrate conditions (such as temperature) allowing improved control over film characteristics.
- Deposition of organic and polymeric mate-rials in thin films not possible by existing technologies.
- Possible adaptation to small portable deposition devices for exotic applications.
Similar advantages arise from the FIMS powder formation method, in particular the ability to generate ultra fine powders, highly uniform size distributions, and uniform or amorphous chemical and physical proper-ties.
The foregoing and other objects, features and advantages of the invention will become more readily apparent from the following detailed description, which proceeds with reference to the accompanying drawings.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF T~E DRAWINGS
Fig. 1 is a graph of a typical pressure-density behavior for a compound in the critical region in terms of reduced parameters.
Fig. 2 is a graph of typical trends for solu-bilities of solids in supercritical fluids as a function of temperature and pressure.
Fig. 3 is a graph of the solubility of silicon dioxide (SiO2) in subcritical and supercritical water at various pressures.
Fig. 4 is a simplified schematic of apparatus for supercritical fluid injection molecular spray deposition of thin films on a substrate or formation of powders in accordance with the invention.
Figs. 5 and 5a are enlarged cross sectional views of two different forms of supercritical fluid injectors used in the apparatus of Fig. 4.
Fig. ~ is a schematic illustration of the fluid injection molecular spray process illustrating the interaction of the supercritical fluid spray with the ~6038~
low pressure region into which it is injected.
Fig. 7 is a photomicrograph showing four dif-ferent examples of supercritical fluid injection molecu-lar spray-deposited silica surfaces in accordance with the invention.
Fig. 8 is a low magnification photomicrograph of three examples of supercritical fluid injection mo-lecular spray-formed silica particles or powders in accordance with the invention.
Fig. 9 is a ten times magnification photomicro-graph of the subject matter of Fig. 8.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
The immediately following sections describe, in turn, the relevant aspects of supercritical fluid behav-ior, the FIMS process, and film deposition and powderformation using the process. These are followed by descriptions of apparatus used in the process and exam-ples of the process and the resultant products. Various background references are cited parenthetically in this description, are listed in the appended bibliography and are incorporated by reference herein to further explain to practitioners of the thin film deposition and powder formation arts certain details of the present invention with which they presently are not ordinarily familiar.
Solubilities in Supercritical Fluids The primary requirement for the Fluid Injection Molecular Spray (FIMS) technique is that the material to be deposited (or a suitable precursor) be soluble in a supercritical fluid. Subsequently in the process, the supercritical fluid or solvent is one which substantial-ly vaporizes into a gas upon expansion from the super-critical state, enabling removal from the vicinity of deposition.
Because of its importance to the FIMS powder and film deposition technique, and the present lack of solubility data for many substances of interest, a brief 38:~l discussion of relevant supercritical fluid phenomena is warranted.
At high pressures above the critical point the resulting fluid or "dense gas" will attain densities approaching those of a liquid (with increased inter-molecular interactions) and will assume some of the properties of a liquid. The supercritical fluid extrac-tion (1) and supercritical fluid chromatography (2) methods utilize the variable but readily controlled properties characteristic of a supercritical fluid.
These properties are dependent upon the fluid composi-tion, temperature, and pressureO
The compressibility of supercritical gases is great, just above the critical temperature where small changes in pressure result in large changes in the den-sity of the supercritical fluid (3)O Fig. 1 shows a typical pressure-density relationship in terms of reduced parameters (e.g., pressure, temperature or den-sity divided by the corresponding variable at the criti-cal point, which are given for a number of compounds inTable 1). Isotherms for various reduced temperatures show the variations in density which can be expected with changes in pressure. The "liquid-likel' behavior of a supercritical fluid at higher pressures results in greatly enhanced solubilizing capabilities compared to those of the "subcritical" gas, with higher diffusion coefficients and an extended useful temperature range compared to liquids. Compounds of high molecular weight can often be dissolved in the supercritical phase at relatively low temperatures; and the solubility of species up to 1,800,000 molecular weight has been demon-strated for polystyrene (4).
An interesting phenomenon associated with supercritical fluids is the occurrence of a "threshold pressure" for solubility of a high molecular weight solute (5). As the pressure is increased, the solu-bility of the solute will often increase by many orders of magnitude with only a small pressure increase (2).
Thus, the threshold pressure is the pressure (for a given temperature) at which the solubility of a compound increases greatly (i.e., becomes detectable). Examples of a few compounds which can be used as supercritical solvents are given in Table 1.
EXAMPLES OF SUPERCRITICAL SOLVENTS
Critical 10 Boiling Critical Critical Density Point Temperature Pressure 3 Compound( c? ( c) (atm) (g/cm ) C2 - 78.5a 31.3 72.9 0.448 NH3 - 33.35 132.4 112.5 0.235 15 H2O 100.00 374.15 218.3 0.315 N2O - 88.56 36.5 71.7 0.45 Methane -164.00 - 82.1 45.8 0.2 Ethane - 88.63 32.28 48.1 0.203 Ethylene -103.7 9.21 49.7 0.218 20 Propane - 42.1 96.67 41.9 0.217 Pentane 36.1 196.6 33.3 0.232 Benzene 80.1 288.9 48.3 0.302 Methanol 64.7 240.5 78.9 0.272 Ethanol 78.5 243.0 63.0 0.276 25 Isopropanol82.5 235.3 47.0 0.273 Isobutanol108.0 275.0 42.4 0.272 Chlorotrifluoro-methane 31.2 28.0 38.7 0.579 Monofluoromethane 78.4 44.6 58.0 0.3 30 Toluene 110.6 320.0 40.6 0.292 Pyridine 115.5 347.0 55.6 0.312 Cyclohexane80.74 280.0 40.2 0.273 m-Cresol 202.2 433.0 45.0 0.346 Decalin 195.65 391.0 25.8 0.254 35 Cyclohexanol155.65356.0 38.0 0.273 o-Xylene 144.4 357.0 35.0 0.284 Tetralin 207.57 446.0 34.7 0.309 Aniline 184.13 426.0 52.4 0.34 Near supercritical liquids demonstrate solu-bility characteristics and other pertinent properties similar to those of supercritical ~luids. The solute may be a liquid at the supercritical temperatures, even though it is a solid at lower temperatures. In addi-tion, it has been demonstrated that fluid "modifiers"
can often alter supercritical fluid properties signifi-cantly, even in relatively low concentrations, greatly increasing solubility for some compounds. These varia-tions are considered to be within the concept of asupercritical fluid as used in the context of this invention.
The fluid phase solubility of higher molecular weight and more polar materials is a necessary pre-requisite for many potentially important E'IMS applica-tions. Unfortunately, the present state of theoretical prediction of fluid phase solubilities is inadequate to serve as a reliable guide to fluid selection. Various approaches to solubility prediction have been suggested or employed. Some of these approaches have been reviewed by Irani and Funk (6). The rigorous theoreti-cal approach is to use the virial equation of-state and calculate the necessary virial coefficients using statistical mechanics. However, the virial equa-tion-of-state does not converge as the critical density is approached (6). Since its application is generally limited to densities of less than half the critical den-sity, it is inadequate for FIMS conditionsO Consequent-ly, at higher solvent densities, an empirical or semi-empirical equation-of-state must be employed.
While both equations-of-state and lattice gas models have been applied to fit supercritical fluid solubility data (7-14), this approach at present is of limited value for polar components and larger organic compounds (15,16).
An alternative approach which uses the more empirically derived solubility parameters can be modi-fied to be an appropriate guide for fluid selection (17,18). This approach has the advantage of simplicity, but necessarily involves approximations due to an inade-quate treatment of density-dependent entropy effects, pressure-volume effects, and other approximations in-herent in solution theory, as well as failures such as those noted for the theoretical methods. ~ore recent approaches, designed to take into consideration the range of attractive forces, have utilized multidimen-sional solubility parameters which are evaluated by more empirical methods (19). In contrast to liquids, the solubility parameter of a supercritical fluid is not a constant value, but is approximately proportional to the gas density. In general, two fluid components are con-sidered likely to be mutually soluble if the component solubility parameters agree to within + 1 (cal/cm3).
However, actual supercritical fluid solubilities are usually less than predicted (18). The solubility para-meter may be divided into two terms related to "chemical effects" and intermolecular forces (17,18). This approach predicts a minimum density below which the solute is not soluble in the fluid phase (the "threshold pressure"). It also suggests that the solubility para-meter will have a maximum value as density is increased if sufficiently high solubility parameters can be obtained. This phenomenon has been observed for several compounds in very high pressure studies (18).
The typical range of variation of the solu-bility of a solid solute in a supercritical fluid sol-vent as a function of temperature and pressure is illustrated in a simplified manner in Fig. 2. l'he solute typically exhibits a threshold fluid pressure 35 above which solubility increases significantly. The region of maximum increase in solubility has been pre-dicted to be near the critical pressure where the change in density is greatest with pressure (see Fig. 1)(20).
In contrast, where volatility of the solute is low and at lower fluid pressures, increasing the temperature will typically decrease solubility as fluid density decreases. However, as with many liquids, "solubility"
may again increase at sufficiently high temperatures, where the solute vapor pressure may also become signifi-cant. Thus, while the highest supercritical fluid den-sities at a given pressure are obtained near the criti-cal temperature, higher solubilities may be obtained atslightly lower fluid densities but higher temperatures.
While there is little data concerning the solu-bility of many materials relevant to FIMS film deposi-tion, some systems have been extensively investigated due to their importance in other fields of technology.
As an example, Figure 3 gives solubility data for sili-con dioxide (SiO2) in subcritical and supercritical water (21~, illustrating the variation in solubility with pressure and temperature. The variation in solu-bility with pressure provides a method for both removalor reduction in impurities, as well as simple control of FIMS deposition rate. Other possible fluid systems include those with chemically-reducing properties, or metals, such as mercury, which are appropriate as sol-vents for metals and other solutes which have extremelylow vapor pressures. Therefore, an important aspect of the invention is the utilization of the increased super-critical fluid solubilities of solid materials for FIMS
film deposition and powder formation.
Fluid Injection Molecular Spray The fundamental basis of the FIMS surface deposition and powder formation process involves a fluid expansion technique in which the net effect is to trans-fer a solid material dissolved in a supercritical fluid to the gas phase at low (i.e. atmospheric or sub-atmos-pheric) pressures, under conditions where it typically has a negligible vapor pressure. I'his process utilizes ~L2~3~
a fluid injection technique which calls for rapidly expanding the supercritical solution through a short orifice into a relatively lower pressure region, i.e.
one of approximately atmospheric or sub-atmospheric pressures. This technique is akin to an injection process, the concept of which I recently developed, for - direct analysis of supercritical fluids by mass spec-trometry (22-26). However, it differs from the spec-trometry application in that the latter is limited to expansion into regions of well-defined pressure of about 1 torr., very low flow rates--less than about 100 micro-liters/min.--and very dilute solute concentrations, and injection into an ion plasma, rather than an energetic-ally passive low-pressure region. An understanding of the physical and chemical phenomena during the FIMS
process is vital to the deposition of films and forma-tion of films with desirable properties.
The design of the FIMS orifice (or pressure restrictor) is a critical factor in overall perform-ance. The FIMS apparatus should be simple, easily main-tained and capable of prolonged operation without fail-ure (e.g., plugging of the restrictor). Additionally, the FIMS process for thin film applications must be designed to provide for control of solute clustering or nucleation, minimization of solvent clusters, and to eliminate or reduce the condensation or decomposition of nonvolatile or thermally labile compounds. Similarly, solute clustering, nucleation and coagulation are utilized to control the formation of fine powders using the FIMS process. The ideal restrictor or orifice allows the entire pressure drop to occur in a single rapid step so as to avoid the precipitation of nonvola-tile material at the orifice. Proper design of the FIMS
injector, discussed hereinafter, allows a rapid expan-sion of the supercritical solution, avoiding theliquid-to-gas phase transition.
33~3~
The unique characteristics of the FIMS process, as contrasted to deposition by liquid spray or nebuliza-tion, center about the direct fluid injection process.
In liquid nebulization the bulk of the spray is initial-ly present as droplets of about micron size or larger.Droplets of this size present the problem of providing sufficient heat to evaporate the solvent. This is im-practical in nearly all cases. Thus spray and nebuliza-tion methods are not true thin film techniques since relatively large particles or agglomerations of mole-cules actually impact the surface. These same charac-teristics also enable the production of much finer pow-ders using FIMS than are practical by techniques not involving gas phase particle growth.
Additional advantages result from the much higher volatility of many supercritical fluids compared to liquid spray or nebulization techniques. This allows the solvent to be readily pumped away or removed since there is little tendency to accumulate on the surface.
Typical conditions in the liquid spray or nebulization techniques result in extensive cluster formation and persistence of a jet of frozen droplets into the low pressure discharge region. A characteristic of the FIMS
process is that, during fluid injection, there is no visible jet formation once the critical temperature has been exceeded.
Thermodynamic considerations for an isentropic expansion, such as the FIMS process, lead one to expect less than a few percent of the solvent to be initially present as clusters. Proper control of conditions dur-ing the FIMS process results in an extremely short life-time for these small clusters. Solvent clusters are rapidly reduced in size due to both evaporation and by the heating process due to the Mach disk shock front, 35 described below. Clusters or small particles of the "solute" can be avoided by having sufficiently dilute supercritical solutions, operating in a temperature range above the critical temperature for the solvent, and expanding under conditions which minimize the extent oE nucleation or agglomeration. On the other hand, small solute particle or powder formation can be maxi-mized by having high solute concentrations and injectionflow rates leading to both clusters with large numbers of solute molecules and increased gas phase nucleation and coagulation processes. The latter conditions can produce a fine powder, having a relatively narrow size distribution, with many applications in materials tech-nologies.
An improved understanding of the FIMS process may be gained by consideration of solvent cluster forma-tion phenomena during isentropic expansion of a high pressure jet 100 through a nozzle 102, as illustrated schematically in Figure 6. The expansion through the FIMS orifice 102 is related to the fluid pressure (Pf), the pressure in the expansion region (Pv), and other parameters involving the nature of the gas, tem-perature, and the design of orifice 102. When an expan-sion occurs in a low pressure region or chamber 104 with a finite background pressure (Pv), the expanding gas in jet 100 will interact with the background gas produc-ing a shock wave system. This includes barrel and reflected shock waves 110 as well as a shock wave 112 (the Mach disk) perpendicular to the jet axis 114. lhe Mach disk is created by the interaction of the super-sonic jet llO and the background gases of region 104.
It is characterized by partial destruction of the directed jet and a transfer of collisional energy resulting in a redistribution of the directed kinetic energy of the jet among the various translational, vibrational and rotational modes. ~hus, the Mach disk serves to heat and break up the solvent clusters formed 35 during the expansion process. Experimentally, it has been o~served that the extent of solvent cluster forma-tion drops rapidly as pressure in the expansion region ~038~
is increased. This pressure change moves the Mach disk closer to the nozzle, curtailing clustering vf the sol-vent.
The distance from the orifice to the Mach disk may be estimated from experimental work (27,28) as 0.67 D(Pf/PV)l/2, where D is the orifice diameter.
Thus, for typical conditions where Pf = 400 atm, Pv = 1 torr and D = 1 um the distance to the ~ach disk is 0.4 mm. Accordingly, it is necessary to have sufficient background gas in the low pressure region to limit clustering of the solvent so that the solvent is not included in the film or powder. This constraint is met in any practical enc~osed vacuum system.
The solvent clusters formed during the expan-sion of a dense gas result from adiabatic cooling infirst stages of the expansion process. The extent of cluster formation is related to the fluid pressure, tem-perature, and the orifice dimensions. Theoretical methods for prediction of the precise extent of cluster formation are still inadequate. However, an empirical method of "corresponding ]ets" has been developed (27) which uses scaled parameters, and has been successfully employed. Randall and Wahrhaftig (28) have applied this method to the expansion of supercritical CO2 and obtained the following empirical equation:
N = 6 X 1011 x Plf 44 x D0.86 x T~s 4 for Pf in torr, T in K, D in mm and where N is the average number of molecules in a cluster and T is the supercritical fluid temperature. For the typical con-ditions noted above this leads to an average clustersize of approximately 1.6 x 103 molecules at 100C or a droplet diameter of about 30 A. For a solute present in a 1.0 mole percent supercritical fluid solution, this corresponds to a solute cluster size of 16 molecules after loss or evaporation of the solvent (gas) mole-cules, assuming all solute molecules remain associated.
For the laser drilled FIMS orifice, the dimensions are ~038~
such that we expect somewhat of a delay in condensation resulting in a faster expansion and less clustering than calculated. More conventional nozzles or longer orifice designs would enhance solvent cluster formation.
Thus, the average clusters formed in the FIMS
expansion process are more than 10~ to 109 less mas-sive than the droplets formed in li~uid spray and nebulization methods. The small clusters formed in the FIMS process are expected to be rapidly broken up in or after the Mach disk due to the energy transfer process described above. The overall result of the FI~S process is to produce a gas spray or a spray of extremely small clusters incorporating the nonvolatile solute mole-culesO This conclusion is supported by our mass spec-trometric observations which show no evidence of cluster formation in any of the supercritical systems studied to date t23,24).
Thus, the foregoing details of the FIMS process are relevant to the injector design, performance, and lifetime, as well as to the characteristics of the molecular spray and the extent of clustering or coagula-tion. The initial solvent clustering phenomena and any subsequent gas phase solute nucleation processes, are also directly relevant to film and powder characteris-tics as described hereinafter.Film Deposition and Powder Formation The FIMS process is the basis of this new thin film deposition and powder formation technique. The FIMS process allows the transfer of nominally nonvola-tile species to the gas phase, from which deposition isexpected to occur with high efficiency upon available sur~aces.
However, while the FIMS process determines the rate of transfer to the gas phase, both the gas phase and substrate conditions have an effect upon the result-ing film. The powder formation process also depends on both the FIMS process and the kinetics of the various ~ ~'6(~
- gas phase processes which promote particle growth. The major gas phase processes include possible association with solvent molecules and possible nucleation of the film species (if the supercritical fluid concentration is sufficiently large). Important variable substrate parameters include distance from the FIMS injector, sur-face characteristics of the substrate, and temperature.
Deposition efficiency also depends in varying degrees upon surface characteristics, pressure, translational energy associated with the molecular spray, and the nature of the particular species being deposited.
Apparatus The viability of the FIMS concept for film deposition and powder formation has been demonstrated by the use of the apparatus shown in Figs. 4, 5, and 5a.
The supercritical fluid apparatus 210 utilizes a Varian 8500 high-pressure syringe pump 212 (8000 psi maximum pressure) and a constant-temperature oven 214 and trans-fer line 216. An expansion chamber 218 is equipped with a pressure monitor in the form of a thermocouple gauge 220 and is pumped using a 10 cfm mechanical pump 222. A
liquid nitrogen trap (not shown) is used to prevent most pump oil from back streaming (however, the films pro-duced did show impurities in several instances due to the presence of a fluorocarbon contaminant and trace impurities due to the pump oil and high quality films free of such impurities should utilize either improved pumping devices or a significant flow of "clean" gas to prevent back diffusion of pump oils). l'he initial con-figuration also required manual removal of a flange forsample substrate 224 placement prior to flange closure and chamber evacuation. '~he procedure is reversed for sample removal. Again an improved system would allow for masking of the substrate until the start of the 35 desired exposure period, and would include interlocks for sample introduction ancl removal. In addition, means (not shown) for substrate heating and sample movement 3~3~
(e.g., rotation) are also desirable for control of deposition conditions and to improve deposition rates (and film thicknesses) over large substrate areas. In addition, for certain powder or film products, it is appropriate to operate under ambient atmospheric condi-tions, thus greatly reducing the complexity of the necessary equipment. For ambient pressure deposition, one would simply need to maintain gas flow to remove the gas (solvent).
Operation under the high vacuum conditions in space would allow desirable conditions for both the pow-der and thin films processes since the gas phase solvent is rapidly removed. In addition, the gravity-free con-ditions available in space would allow the formation of fine particles having highly symmetric physical proper-ties. In addition, any FIMS process system would bene-fit from a number of FIMS injectors operating in tandem to produce more uniform production of powders or films or to inject different materials to produce powder and films of variable chemical composition.
Several FIMS probes have been designed and tested in this process. One design, illustrated in Figure 5, consists of a heated probe 226 (maintained at the same temperature as the oven and transfer line) and a pressure restrictor consisting of a laser drilled orifice in a 50 to 250 um thick stainless steel disc 228. A small tin gasket is used to make a tight seal between the probe tip and the pressure restrictor, resulting in a dead volume estimated to be on the order of 0.01 uL. Good results have been obtained with laser drilled orifices in u~ 250 um (.25 mm) thick stainless steel. The orifice is typically in the 1-4 um diameter size range although this range is primarily determined by the desired flow rate. Larger orifices may be used and, for similar solute concentrations, will increase the extent of nucleation during the FIMS expansion. The actual orifice dimensions are variable due to the laser drilling process. A second design (Fig. 5a) of probe 226a is similar to that of Fig. 5, but terminates in a capillary restriction obtained, for example, by care-fully crimping the terminal 0.1-0.5 mm of platinum-irid-ium tubing 230. This design provides the desired flowrate as well as an effectively zero dead volume, but more sporadic success than the laser-drilled orifice.
Another restrictor (not shown) is made by soldering a short length (c~ 1 cm) of tubing having a very small inside diameter (c~ 5 um for a small system but poten-tially much larger for large scale film deposition or high powder formation rates) inside of tubing with a much larger inside diameter so that it acts as an ori-fice or nozzle.
The important point is to enable the injection process to be sufficiently fast so that material has insufficient time to precipitate and plug the orifice.
Thus a 10 cm length of 10 um I.D. tubing plugs vary rapidly--the pressure drops along the capillary and at some point the solute precipitates and collects, ulti-mately plugging the tube. It is important to minimize any precipitation by making the pressure drop as rapid as possible. A simple calculation shows that the fluid moves through a short 100 um restriction in C 10 6 seconds.
Very concentrated (saturated) solutions can also be handled with reduced probability of plugging by adjusting the conditions in the probe so that the solvating power of the fluid is increased just before injection. This can be done in many cases by simply operating at a slightly lower or higher temperature, where the solubility is larger, and depending upon pres-sure as indicated in Fig. 2.
Examples The two systems chosen for demonstration involved deposition of polystyrene films on platinum and fused silica, and deposition of silica on platinum and ~ ~n.~
glass. The supercritical solution for polystyrene involved a 0.1% solution in a pentane -2~ cyclohexanol solution. Supercritical water containing ~ 0.02% SiO2 was used for the silica deposition. In both cases the substrate was at ambient temperatures and the deposition pressure was typically approximately 1 torr, although some experiments described hereinafter were conducted under atmospheric pressure. The films produced ranged from having a nearly featureless and apparently amor-phous s~ructure to those with a distinct crystallinestructure. It should be noted that, as in chemical vapor deposition, control over film characteris-tics--amorphous, polycrystalline and even epitaxial in some instances--is obtained by control of the substrate surface and temperature). Relatively even deposition was obtained over the small surfaces (~ 4 cm2).
Fourier transform infrared analysis of the polystyrene films on fused silica (not shown) did not show detectable amounts of the cyclohexanol solvent.
However, the silica films did show evidence of fluoro-carbon impurities possibly due to the sample cell.
Analysis of the films indicated a thickness of approxi-mately 0.5 um for polystyrene and 2800 A for silica for five minute deposition periods. Much greater or smaller formation rates can be obtained by adjustment of para-meters noted previously and the use of multiple FIMS
in~ectors.
These limited studies also indicated that more concentrated solutions with long distances to the deposition surface could result in substantial nuclea-tion and coagulation for some materials. For example, for silica, it was possible to generate an extremely fine powder having a complex structure and an average particle size ~ 0.1 um. Using a saturated polystyrene solution produced particles (not shown) as large as 0.3 um with an extremely narrow size distribution.
~6~1381 The range of surface structures produced for the silica deposition studies show an even wider range of surface characteristics. Figure 7 gives scanning electron photomicrographs obtained for silica film deposition on glass surfaces under the range of condi-tions listed in Table 2 below.
Solute: Silica Solvent: Water Expansion region at ambient 10 temperature for 5-10 minutes exposed.
Supercritical E'luid FIMS Conditions Silica Conc.
Est.
15 from Solu-bility Pressure Film Data Temp (atm)Flow Rate Pressure A 0.01% 450C 400 atm40 uL/min 0.5 torr B 0.02% 400C 450 atm 40-70 uL/min 0.5 torr C 0.04% 490C 400 atm150 uL/min 0.6 torr D* 0.04% 450C 400 atm250 uL/min 0.9 torr Powder A 0.02~ 520C 450 atm100 uL~min 1 atm (760 torr) B* 0.05% 450C 400 atm90 uL/min 0.5 torr C 0.04% 450C 400 atm300 uL/min 1.2 torr *Contained flurocarbon contaminant The photomicrographs show that the deposited films range from relatively smooth and uniform (Figs. 7A and 7B) to complex and having a large surface area (Figs. 7C and 7D). Similarly, Figs. 8 and 9 show powders produ~ed under conditions where nucleation and coagulation are increased. It should be noted that different FIMS
restrictors were utilized for these examples. The resulting products are not expected to be precisely ~6~3~3~
reproducible but are representative of the range of films or powders which can be produced using the EIMS
process. In addition, different solutes would be expected to change the physical properties of the resulting films and powders.
In general, high injection or flow rates pro-duce a more granular film surface or larger powder sizes, as do higher solute concentrations, and higher expansion chamber pressures. To a certain extent, orifice length and shape will also affect granularity.
The deposition rate also increases as the product of solute concentration and the flow rate increase. Solute concentration is a more important determinant of granu-larity than flow rate. Therefore, to alter granularity it is preferable to vary the solute concentration and to alter deposition rate it is preferable to vary flow rate.
Having illustrated and described the principles of my invention in two embodiments, with a number of examples illustrating variations thereof, it should be apparent to those skilled in the art that the invention can be modified in arrangement and detail without departing from such principles. Accordingly, I claim all modifications coming within the spirit and scope of the following claims.
38~
REFERENCES
1. Schneider, G. M., E. Stahl and G. Wilke, editors. 1980. "Extraction with Supercritical Gases," Verlag Chemie, Deerfield Beach, Floriaa.
2. Gouw, T. H., and R. E. Jentoft, Adv. Chroma-togr., 13, 1-40 (1975).
3. Wassen, u. Van I. Swaid and G. M. Schneider, Aqenw. Chem. Int. Ed. Enq., 19, 575-587 (1980).
4. Giddings, J. C., M. N. Myers, L. McLaren and R.
A. Keller, Science, 162, 67-73, (1968).
A. Keller, Science, 162, 67-73, (1968).
5. Irani, C. A., and E. W. Funk, in: Recent Developments in Separation Science, N. N. Li (Ed.), CRC Press, Cleveland, p. 171 (1977).
6. Schindler, H. D., J. M. Chen, and J. D. Potts, "Integrated Two Stage Liquefaction Topical Technical Progress Report Completion of Indiana V Program," NTIS 14804-Q7 (1982).
7. Prausnitz, J. M., Molecular Thermodynamics of Fluid Phase Equilibrium, Prentice-Hall, Engle-wood Cliffs (1969).
8. Oellrich, L., U. Plocker, J. M. Prausnitz and H. Knapp, Chem. Ing. Tech., 49, 955 (1977).
9. Prausnitz, J. M., Inst. Chem. Eng. Trans., 59, 3 (1981).
10. Peter, S., Ber Bunsenges. Phys. Chem., 81, 950 (1977).
11. Johnson, K. P., and C. A. Eckert, Amer. Inst.
Chem. Eng., 27, 773 (1981).
Chem. Eng., 27, 773 (1981).
12. Franck, E. U., Berichte Bunsen-Gesellschaft, 75, 341 (1972).
13. Hamann, S. D. and M. Liuron, Trans. Far Soc., 65, 2186 (1968).
14. Kleintjens, L. A., and R. Koringsveld, J. Elec-trochem. Soc., 127, 2352 (1980).
15. Kleintjens, L. A., and R. Koringsveld, Sep.
Sci. Tech., 17, 215 (1982).
Sci. Tech., 17, 215 (1982).
16. Vezzetti, D. J., J. Chem. Phys., 77, 1512 (1982).
~2~;~3~3~
~2~;~3~3~
17. Giddings, J. C., M. N. Myers and J. W. King., J. Chromato~r. Sci., 7, 276-283 (1969).
18. Bowman, L. M., Ph.d. Thesis, University of Utah (1976).
19. Barton, A.F.M., Chem. Rev., 731 (1975).
20. Hoy, K. L., J. Paint l'echnol., 42, 76 (1970).
21. Konstam, A. H. and Feairheller, A.I. Ch. E.
Journal, 16, 837 (1970).
Journal, 16, 837 (1970).
22. P. Hubert and O. V. Vitzthum, "Fluid Extraction of ~ops, Spices and Tobacco with Supercritical Gases in Extraction with Supercritical Gases"
edited by G. M. Schneider and E. Stahl and G.
Wilke, Verlag Chemi Weinheim, 1980, pages 26-43.
edited by G. M. Schneider and E. Stahl and G.
Wilke, Verlag Chemi Weinheim, 1980, pages 26-43.
23. "Assessment of Critical Fluid Extractions in the Process Industries," Critical Systems Incorporated, A. D. Little, Cambridge, Mass.
Ecut Biocatholysis, U.S. Department of Energy, JPO-9950-793, April, 1982.
Ecut Biocatholysis, U.S. Department of Energy, JPO-9950-793, April, 1982.
24. Smith, R. D., W. D. Felix, J. C. Fjeldsted and M. L. Lee, Anal. Chem., 54, 1883 (1982).
25. Smith, R. D., J. C. Fjeldsted, and M. L. Lee, J. Chromato~., 247, 231-243 (1982).
26. Smith, R. D. and H. R. Udseth, Biomed. Mass Spectrom, in press, (1983).
27. Smith, R. D. and H. R. Udseth, Fuel, 62, 466-468 (1983).
28. Smith, R. D. and H. R. Udseth, Sep. Sci. Tech., 18, 245 (1983).
29. Hagena, O. F., and W. Obert, J. Chem. Phys., 56, 1793 (1972).
30. Randall, L. G. and A. L. Wahrahaftig, Rev. Sci.
Instrum., 52, 1283-1295 (1981).
Instrum., 52, 1283-1295 (1981).
Claims (29)
PROPERTY OR PRIVILEGE IS CLAIMED ARE DEFINED AS FOLLOWS:
1. A method for depositing a film of solid material, on a surface, comprising:
forming a supercritical solution including a supercritical fluid solvent and a dissolved solute of a solid material;
rapidly expanding the supercritical solution through an orifice of a predetermined length and diame-ter to produce a molecular spray of the material and solvent; and directing the molecular spray against a surface to deposit a film of the solid material thereon.
forming a supercritical solution including a supercritical fluid solvent and a dissolved solute of a solid material;
rapidly expanding the supercritical solution through an orifice of a predetermined length and diame-ter to produce a molecular spray of the material and solvent; and directing the molecular spray against a surface to deposit a film of the solid material thereon.
2. A method according to claim 1, wherein the supercritical solution is subjected to an elevated pres-sure within a predetermined range, including varying the pressure to control solute solubility and thereby the rate of film deposition.
3. A method according to claim 1, in which the surface upon which the film is to be deposited is located within an expansion region of lower pressure, including varying the expansion region pressure to con-trol nucleation of solute molecules in the molecular spray.
4. A method according to claim 3, including decreasing the expansion region pressure to decrease granularity of the film deposited on the surface.
5. A method according to claim 1, including controlling the rate of expansion of the supercritical solution through the orifice to limit nucleation of solute molecules in the spray.
6. A method according to claim 5, in which controlling the rate of expansion includes varying at least one of the orifice dimensions and the supercriti-cal fluid pressure.
7. A method according to claim 1, including varying the flow rate of the supercritical fluid solu-tion through the orifice to vary the rate of deposition.
8. A method according to claim 1, including varying the solute concentration in order to vary the granularity of the film deposited on the surface.
9. A method according to claim 8, in which the solute concentration is reduced so as to deposit a fine film of the solute material on the surface.
10. A method for forming a fine powder of a solid material, comprising:
forming a supercritical solution including a supercritical fluid solvent and a dissolved solute of a solid material;
rapidly expanding the supercritical solution through an orifice of a predetermined length and diameter to produce a particulate spray of the material and vaporized solvent; and discharging the spray into a low pressure region to form a powder of the solid material therein.
forming a supercritical solution including a supercritical fluid solvent and a dissolved solute of a solid material;
rapidly expanding the supercritical solution through an orifice of a predetermined length and diameter to produce a particulate spray of the material and vaporized solvent; and discharging the spray into a low pressure region to form a powder of the solid material therein.
11. A method according to claim 10, wherein the supercritical solution is subjected to an elevated pressure within a predetermined range, including varying the pressure to control the rate of production of the powder.
12. A method according to claim 10, wherein the supercritical solution has a predetermined concen-tration of the solute, and an elevated pressure and a temperature within a predetermined range, including varying at least said concentration to promote nuclea-tion of molecules of the solute in the spray.
13. A method according to claim 12, in which a more supercritical fluid solute concentration is increased to increase the particle size of the powder.
14. A method according to claim 10, including controlling the rate of expansion of the supercritical solution through the orifice to promote nucleation of molecules of the solid material.
15. A method according to claim 13, wherein controlling the rate of expansion includes varying at least one of said orifice dimensions and the supercriti-cal fluid pressure.
16. A method according to claim 10, including varying the pressure within the low pressure region in order to vary a microstructural property of the powder.
17. A method for forming a solid material into one of a thin film and a powder, comprising:
forming a supercritical solution containing a supercritical fluid solvent and a dissolved solute of the solid material in a predetermined concentration and at an elevated pressure;
discharging the supercritical solution through a short orifice into a region of lower pressure so as to rapidly expand the solution to produce a molecular spray of the solid material and solvent; and varying at least one of the elevated pressure, the solute concentration, the solution temperature, and the pressure of the low pressure region so as to control one of the rate of deposition of solute and the extent of nucleation of molecules of the solute in the low pressure region.
forming a supercritical solution containing a supercritical fluid solvent and a dissolved solute of the solid material in a predetermined concentration and at an elevated pressure;
discharging the supercritical solution through a short orifice into a region of lower pressure so as to rapidly expand the solution to produce a molecular spray of the solid material and solvent; and varying at least one of the elevated pressure, the solute concentration, the solution temperature, and the pressure of the low pressure region so as to control one of the rate of deposition of solute and the extent of nucleation of molecules of the solute in the low pressure region.
18. A method according to claim 17, including maintaining the low pressure region at a predetermined pressure and discharging the solution as a free jet so as to supersonically react with gases in the low pres-sure chamber to break up solvent clusters; maintaining the low pressure region at a predetermined temperature to vaporize the solvent; and pumping gases from the low pressure region to control the pressure thereof and to remove a portion of the solvent gases therefrom.
19. A method according to claim 17, including varying a dimension of the orifice in order to vary the expansion flow rate of the supercritical fluid there-through.
20. Apparatus for depositing films and pro-ducing ultra-fine powders, comprising:
means for pressurizing a solvent fluid to a pressure at least as high as approximately the critical pressure of the fluid;
heating and dissolving means for heating said fluid to a temperature at least substantially as high as its critical temperature while at said pressure and dissolving a normally solid solute in said fluid to produce a supercritical solution of the solute and fluid;
means defining a region containing an energet-ically passive gas at a reduced pressure much less than the fluid pressure;
means defining an orifice in communication with said heating and dissolving means, for discharging the solution under said fluid pressure into the region of reduced pressure, passive gas as a free jet molecular spray; and collecting means positioned in said region for collecting solid solute from the spray as a film or powder.
means for pressurizing a solvent fluid to a pressure at least as high as approximately the critical pressure of the fluid;
heating and dissolving means for heating said fluid to a temperature at least substantially as high as its critical temperature while at said pressure and dissolving a normally solid solute in said fluid to produce a supercritical solution of the solute and fluid;
means defining a region containing an energet-ically passive gas at a reduced pressure much less than the fluid pressure;
means defining an orifice in communication with said heating and dissolving means, for discharging the solution under said fluid pressure into the region of reduced pressure, passive gas as a free jet molecular spray; and collecting means positioned in said region for collecting solid solute from the spray as a film or powder.
21. An apparatus according to claim 20 in which a small-bore conduit connects said heating and dissolving means to said orifice.
22. Apparatus according to claim 21 further including means for controlling the temperature of said conduit.
23. Apparatus according to claim 20 including means for continuously removing gases including a vapour of said fluid from said region.
24. An apparatus according to claim 23 in which said means for continuously removing gases and vapor from said chamber is operable to maintain the pressure therein below the vapor pressure of said fluid as the solution discharges from said orifice.
25. Apparatus according to claim 20 in which the orifice is sized to expand the supercritical solu-tion, upon discharge into the region of reduced pressure, in a single rapid pressure drop so as to transfer the solution to a gas phase substantially without passing through a liquid-to-gas transition.
26. An apparatus according to claim 25 in which said orifice has a diameter of not more than a few micrometers.
27. Apparatus according to claim 25 in which the means defining the passive region is an enclosed chamber for containing said passive gas at a pressure greater than the vapor pressure of the solute.
28. Apparatus according to claim 25 in which said orifice has a length of about 0.25 mm.
29. Apparatus according to claim 20 in which the collecting means is positioned in front of the orifice to receive the spray directly therefrom along a line of sight and spaced from the orifice a distance such that a Mach disk shock front is formed in said region between the orifice and the collecting means, by inter-action of the free jet spray and the background gases in the region.
Applications Claiming Priority (3)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US528,723 | 1983-09-01 | ||
US06/528,723 US4582731A (en) | 1983-09-01 | 1983-09-01 | Supercritical fluid molecular spray film deposition and powder formation |
CA000556177A CA1327684C (en) | 1983-09-01 | 1988-01-08 | Supercritical fluid molecular spray films, powder and fibers |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
CA1260381A true CA1260381A (en) | 1989-09-26 |
Family
ID=25671655
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
CA000461977A Expired CA1260381A (en) | 1983-09-01 | 1984-08-28 | Supercritical fluid molecular spray film deposition and powder formation |
Country Status (7)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (1) | US4582731A (en) |
EP (1) | EP0157827B1 (en) |
JP (1) | JPS61500210A (en) |
AT (1) | ATE31152T1 (en) |
CA (1) | CA1260381A (en) |
DE (1) | DE3467863D1 (en) |
WO (1) | WO1985000993A1 (en) |
Families Citing this family (191)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US4552786A (en) * | 1984-10-09 | 1985-11-12 | The Babcock & Wilcox Company | Method for densification of ceramic materials |
US5314642A (en) * | 1984-11-27 | 1994-05-24 | Igen, Inc. | Interaction system comprising a surfactant-stabilized aqueous phase containing an antibody fragment |
DE3682130D1 (en) * | 1985-07-15 | 1991-11-28 | Japan Res Dev Corp | METHOD FOR PRODUCING ULTRAFINE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS. |
US4875810A (en) * | 1985-10-21 | 1989-10-24 | Canon Kabushiki Kaisha | Apparatus for controlling fine particle flow |
US4737384A (en) * | 1985-11-01 | 1988-04-12 | Allied Corporation | Deposition of thin films using supercritical fluids |
EP0245090A3 (en) * | 1986-05-06 | 1990-03-14 | Konica Corporation | Silver halide photographic material having improved antistatic and antiblocking properties |
DE3628443C1 (en) * | 1986-08-21 | 1988-02-11 | Dornier System Gmbh | Process for the production of amorphous layers |
US5057342A (en) * | 1987-12-21 | 1991-10-15 | Union Carbide Chemicals And Plastics Technology Corporation | Methods and apparatus for obtaining a feathered spray when spraying liquids by airless techniques |
US5141156A (en) * | 1987-12-21 | 1992-08-25 | Union Carbide Chemicals & Plastics Technology Corporation | Methods and apparatus for obtaining a feathered spray when spraying liquids by airless techniques |
ES2043640T3 (en) * | 1987-12-21 | 1994-01-01 | Union Carbide Corp | SUPERCRITICAL FLUIDS AS THINNERS IN THE APPLICATION BY LIQUID SPRAY OF COATINGS. |
US5108799A (en) * | 1988-07-14 | 1992-04-28 | Union Carbide Chemicals & Plastics Technology Corporation | Liquid spray application of coatings with supercritical fluids as diluents and spraying from an orifice |
US5106650A (en) * | 1988-07-14 | 1992-04-21 | Union Carbide Chemicals & Plastics Technology Corporation | Electrostatic liquid spray application of coating with supercritical fluids as diluents and spraying from an orifice |
US5066522A (en) * | 1988-07-14 | 1991-11-19 | Union Carbide Chemicals And Plastics Technology Corporation | Supercritical fluids as diluents in liquid spray applications of adhesives |
ES2045280T3 (en) * | 1988-07-14 | 1994-01-16 | Union Carbide Corp | APPLICATION OF COATINGS BY ELCTROSTATIC SPRAY OF LIOQUIDS WITH SUPERCRITICAL FLUIDS AS THINNERS AND SPRAYING FROM A HOLE. |
US5203843A (en) * | 1988-07-14 | 1993-04-20 | Union Carbide Chemicals & Plastics Technology Corporation | Liquid spray application of coatings with supercritical fluids as diluents and spraying from an orifice |
US5169687A (en) * | 1988-09-16 | 1992-12-08 | University Of South Florida | Supercritical fluid-aided treatment of porous materials |
US5707634A (en) * | 1988-10-05 | 1998-01-13 | Pharmacia & Upjohn Company | Finely divided solid crystalline powders via precipitation into an anti-solvent |
US5094892A (en) * | 1988-11-14 | 1992-03-10 | Weyerhaeuser Company | Method of perfusing a porous workpiece with a chemical composition using cosolvents |
US4882107A (en) * | 1988-11-23 | 1989-11-21 | Union Carbide Chemicals And Plastics Company Inc. | Mold release coating process and apparatus using a supercritical fluid |
DE69003711T2 (en) * | 1989-03-22 | 1994-01-27 | Union Carbide Chem Plastic | Precursor coating compositions. |
US5009367A (en) * | 1989-03-22 | 1991-04-23 | Union Carbide Chemicals And Plastics Technology Corporation | Methods and apparatus for obtaining wider sprays when spraying liquids by airless techniques |
ES2042110T3 (en) * | 1989-03-22 | 1993-12-01 | Union Carbide Chemicals And Plastics Company, Inc. | PRE-COURSE COMPOSITIONS FOR COATING. |
CA2026298A1 (en) * | 1989-09-27 | 1991-03-28 | Alex C. Kuo | Method and apparatus for metering and mixing non-compressible and compressible fluids |
US4970093A (en) * | 1990-04-12 | 1990-11-13 | University Of Colorado Foundation | Chemical deposition methods using supercritical fluid solutions |
JP3047110B2 (en) * | 1990-06-15 | 2000-05-29 | 株式会社東北テクノアーチ | Method for producing metal oxide fine particles |
US5171089A (en) * | 1990-06-27 | 1992-12-15 | Union Carbide Chemicals & Plastics Technology Corporation | Semi-continuous method and apparatus for forming a heated and pressurized mixture of fluids in a predetermined proportion |
US5171613A (en) * | 1990-09-21 | 1992-12-15 | Union Carbide Chemicals & Plastics Technology Corporation | Apparatus and methods for application of coatings with supercritical fluids as diluents by spraying from an orifice |
US5306350A (en) * | 1990-12-21 | 1994-04-26 | Union Carbide Chemicals & Plastics Technology Corporation | Methods for cleaning apparatus using compressed fluids |
US5290827A (en) * | 1991-03-27 | 1994-03-01 | University Of Delaware | Precipitation of homogeneous polymer mixtures from supercritical fluid solutions |
PT100307B (en) * | 1991-03-27 | 1999-06-30 | Univ Delaware | PROCESS FOR THE PREPARATION OF HOMOGENEOUS POLYMERS USING SUPERCRYTIC FLUID SOLUTIONS |
AU654337B2 (en) * | 1991-03-27 | 1994-11-03 | Union Carbide Chemicals & Plastics Technology Corporation | Chemical reaction suppression system |
US5212229A (en) * | 1991-03-28 | 1993-05-18 | Union Carbide Chemicals & Plastics Technology Corporation | Monodispersed acrylic polymers in supercritical, near supercritical and subcritical fluids |
US5105843A (en) * | 1991-03-28 | 1992-04-21 | Union Carbide Chemicals & Plastics Technology Corporation | Isocentric low turbulence injector |
US5170727A (en) * | 1991-03-29 | 1992-12-15 | Union Carbide Chemicals & Plastics Technology Corporation | Supercritical fluids as diluents in combustion of liquid fuels and waste materials |
US5178325A (en) * | 1991-06-25 | 1993-01-12 | Union Carbide Chemicals & Plastics Technology Corporation | Apparatus and methods for application of coatings with compressible fluids as diluent by spraying from an orifice |
US5214925A (en) * | 1991-09-30 | 1993-06-01 | Union Carbide Chemicals & Plastics Technology Corporation | Use of liquified compressed gases as a refrigerant to suppress cavitation and compressibility when pumping liquified compressed gases |
CA2082565A1 (en) * | 1991-11-12 | 1993-05-13 | John N. Argyropoulos | Polyester particularly suitable for use in coating compositions which are sprayed with compressed fluids as viscosity reducing diluents |
KR930019861A (en) * | 1991-12-12 | 1993-10-19 | 완다 케이. 덴슨-로우 | Coating method using dense gas |
US5301664A (en) * | 1992-03-06 | 1994-04-12 | Sievers Robert E | Methods and apparatus for drug delivery using supercritical solutions |
US5639441A (en) * | 1992-03-06 | 1997-06-17 | Board Of Regents Of University Of Colorado | Methods for fine particle formation |
US5863612A (en) * | 1992-03-27 | 1999-01-26 | University North Carolina--Chapel Hill | Method of making fluoropolymers |
US5688879A (en) * | 1992-03-27 | 1997-11-18 | The University Of North Carolina At Chapel Hill | Method of making fluoropolymers |
DE69334213T2 (en) * | 1992-03-27 | 2009-06-18 | University Of North Carolina At Chapel Hill | Process for the preparation of fluoropolymers |
US5389263A (en) * | 1992-05-20 | 1995-02-14 | Phasex Corporation | Gas anti-solvent recrystallization and application for the separation and subsequent processing of RDX and HMX |
US5304390A (en) * | 1992-06-30 | 1994-04-19 | Union Carbide Chemicals & Plastics Technology Corporation | Supercritical ratio control system utilizing a sonic flow venturi and an air-driven positive displacement pump |
US5318225A (en) * | 1992-09-28 | 1994-06-07 | Union Carbide Chemicals & Plastics Technology Corporation | Methods and apparatus for preparing mixtures with compressed fluids |
US5290602A (en) * | 1992-10-19 | 1994-03-01 | Union Carbide Chemicals & Plastics Technology Corporation | Hindered-hydroxyl functional (meth) acrylate-containing copolymers particularly suitable for use in coating compositions which are sprayed with compressed fluids as viscosity reducing diluents |
EP0669858A4 (en) * | 1992-11-02 | 1997-07-16 | Ferro Corp | Method of preparing coating materials. |
US5312862A (en) * | 1992-12-18 | 1994-05-17 | Union Carbide Chemicals & Plastics Technology Corporation | Methods for admixing compressed fluids with solvent-borne compositions comprising solid polymers |
US5290604A (en) * | 1992-12-18 | 1994-03-01 | Union Carbide Chemicals & Plastics Technology Corporation | Methods and apparatus for spraying solvent-borne compositions with reduced solvent emission using compressed fluids and separating solvent |
US5290603A (en) * | 1992-12-18 | 1994-03-01 | Union Carbide Chemicals & Plastics Technology Corporation | Method for spraying polymeric compositions with reduced solvent emission and enhanced atomization |
US5529634A (en) * | 1992-12-28 | 1996-06-25 | Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba | Apparatus and method of manufacturing semiconductor device |
US5545360A (en) * | 1993-06-08 | 1996-08-13 | Industrial Technology Research Institute | Process for preparing powders with superior homogeneity from aqueous solutions of metal nitrates |
US5464154A (en) * | 1993-09-29 | 1995-11-07 | Union Carbide Chemicals & Plastics Technology Corporation | Methods for spraying polymeric compositions with compressed fluids and enhanced atomization |
US5419487A (en) * | 1993-09-29 | 1995-05-30 | Union Carbide Chemicals & Plastics Technology Corporation | Methods for the spray application of water-borne coatings with compressed fluids |
US5455076A (en) * | 1993-10-05 | 1995-10-03 | Union Carbide Chemicals & Plastics Technology Corporation | Method and apparatus for proportioning and mixing non-compressible and compressible fluids |
US5520942A (en) * | 1994-02-15 | 1996-05-28 | Nabisco, Inc. | Snack food coating using supercritical fluid spray |
ES2141947T3 (en) * | 1994-06-14 | 2000-04-01 | Dupont Performance Coatings | PROCEDURE FOR THE PREPARATION OF POWDER PAINT COMPOSITIONS AND THEIR USE TO MAKE COATINGS. |
GB9413202D0 (en) * | 1994-06-30 | 1994-08-24 | Univ Bradford | Method and apparatus for the formation of particles |
US5716558A (en) * | 1994-11-14 | 1998-02-10 | Union Carbide Chemicals & Plastics Technology Corporation | Method for producing coating powders catalysts and drier water-borne coatings by spraying compositions with compressed fluids |
MX9504934A (en) * | 1994-12-12 | 1997-01-31 | Morton Int Inc | Smooth thin film powder coatings. |
WO1996035983A1 (en) * | 1995-05-10 | 1996-11-14 | Ferro Corporation | Control system for processes using supercritical fluids |
JP4047382B2 (en) * | 1995-08-04 | 2008-02-13 | マイクロコーティング テクノロジーズ | Chemical vapor deposition and powder formation using near-supercritical and supercritical fluid solution spraying |
US5744556A (en) * | 1995-09-25 | 1998-04-28 | Union Carbide Chemicals & Plastics Technology Corporation | Gas phase polymerization employing unsupported catalysts |
US5803966A (en) * | 1995-11-01 | 1998-09-08 | Alcon Laboratories, Inc. | Process for sizing prednisolone acetate using a supercritical fluid anti-solvent |
US5709910A (en) * | 1995-11-06 | 1998-01-20 | Lockheed Idaho Technologies Company | Method and apparatus for the application of textile treatment compositions to textile materials |
US5645894A (en) * | 1996-01-17 | 1997-07-08 | The Gillette Company | Method of treating razor blade cutting edges |
US5716751A (en) * | 1996-04-01 | 1998-02-10 | Xerox Corporation | Toner particle comminution and surface treatment processes |
US6583187B1 (en) | 1996-07-19 | 2003-06-24 | Andrew T. Daly | Continuous processing of powder coating compositions |
US6114414A (en) * | 1996-07-19 | 2000-09-05 | Morton International, Inc. | Continuous processing of powder coating compositions |
US5766522A (en) * | 1996-07-19 | 1998-06-16 | Morton International, Inc. | Continuous processing of powder coating compositions |
US6075074A (en) | 1996-07-19 | 2000-06-13 | Morton International, Inc. | Continuous processing of powder coating compositions |
US5766637A (en) * | 1996-10-08 | 1998-06-16 | University Of Delaware | Microencapsulation process using supercritical fluids |
US5789027A (en) * | 1996-11-12 | 1998-08-04 | University Of Massachusetts | Method of chemically depositing material onto a substrate |
JPH10192670A (en) * | 1996-12-27 | 1998-07-28 | Inoue Seisakusho:Kk | Dispersion and dispersing apparatus utilizing supercritical state |
GB9703673D0 (en) * | 1997-02-21 | 1997-04-09 | Bradford Particle Design Ltd | Method and apparatus for the formation of particles |
FR2763258B1 (en) * | 1997-05-15 | 1999-06-25 | Commissariat Energie Atomique | PROCESS FOR THE MANUFACTURE OF METAL OXIDES, SINGLE OR MIXED, OR OF SILICON OXIDE |
US6287640B1 (en) | 1997-05-30 | 2001-09-11 | Micell Technologies, Inc. | Surface treatment of substrates with compounds that bind thereto |
CA2291146C (en) * | 1997-05-30 | 2008-09-09 | Micell Technologies | Surface treatment |
US6165560A (en) * | 1997-05-30 | 2000-12-26 | Micell Technologies | Surface treatment |
US6344243B1 (en) | 1997-05-30 | 2002-02-05 | Micell Technologies, Inc. | Surface treatment |
US5993747A (en) * | 1997-06-25 | 1999-11-30 | Ferro Corporation | Mixing system for processes using supercritical fluids |
US6054103A (en) * | 1997-06-25 | 2000-04-25 | Ferro Corporation | Mixing system for processes using supercritical fluids |
US6127000A (en) * | 1997-10-10 | 2000-10-03 | North Carolina State University | Method and compositions for protecting civil infrastructure |
DE19749989A1 (en) | 1997-11-12 | 1999-05-27 | Herberts Gmbh | Process for the preparation of powder coating compositions |
US6012647A (en) * | 1997-12-01 | 2000-01-11 | 3M Innovative Properties Company | Apparatus and method of atomizing and vaporizing |
GB9810559D0 (en) * | 1998-05-15 | 1998-07-15 | Bradford Particle Design Ltd | Method and apparatus for particle formation |
US6340722B1 (en) | 1998-09-04 | 2002-01-22 | The University Of Akron | Polymerization, compatibilized blending, and particle size control of powder coatings in a supercritical fluid |
US6184270B1 (en) | 1998-09-21 | 2001-02-06 | Eric J. Beckman | Production of power formulations |
US6221435B1 (en) | 1998-11-18 | 2001-04-24 | Union Carbide Chemicals & Plastics Technology Corporation | Method for the spray application of polymeric-containing liquid coating compositions using subcritical compressed fluids under choked flow spraying conditions |
US6630121B1 (en) | 1999-06-09 | 2003-10-07 | The Regents Of The University Of Colorado | Supercritical fluid-assisted nebulization and bubble drying |
GB9915975D0 (en) * | 1999-07-07 | 1999-09-08 | Bradford Particle Design Ltd | Method for the formation of particles |
CA2385324C (en) | 1999-09-22 | 2008-03-25 | Miodrag Oljaca | Liquid atomization methods and devices |
WO2001024917A1 (en) | 1999-10-07 | 2001-04-12 | Battelle Memorial Institute | Method and apparatus for obtaining a suspension of particles |
US6689700B1 (en) * | 1999-11-02 | 2004-02-10 | University Of Massachusetts | Chemical fluid deposition method for the formation of metal and metal alloy films on patterned and unpatterned substrates |
CN1239269C (en) * | 1999-11-26 | 2006-02-01 | 旭硝子株式会社 | Method and apparatus for forming thin film of organic material |
FR2803538B1 (en) * | 1999-12-15 | 2002-06-07 | Separex Sa | METHOD AND DEVICE FOR CAPTURING FINE PARTICLES BY PERCOLATION IN A BED OF GRANULES |
KR100755734B1 (en) * | 2000-03-03 | 2007-09-06 | 베링거 인겔하임 파마슈티칼즈, 인코포레이티드 | Material processing by repeated solvent expansion-contraction |
ES2170008B1 (en) * | 2000-08-25 | 2003-05-01 | Soc Es Carburos Metalicos Sa | PROCEDURE FOR THE PRECIPITATION OF SOLID PARTICLES FINALLY DIVIDED. |
US6652654B1 (en) * | 2000-09-27 | 2003-11-25 | Bechtel Bwxt Idaho, Llc | System configured for applying multiple modifying agents to a substrate |
US6623686B1 (en) * | 2000-09-28 | 2003-09-23 | Bechtel Bwxt Idaho, Llc | System configured for applying a modifying agent to a non-equidimensional substrate |
GB0027357D0 (en) | 2000-11-09 | 2000-12-27 | Bradford Particle Design Plc | Particle formation methods and their products |
DE10059167A1 (en) * | 2000-11-29 | 2002-06-06 | Bsh Bosch Siemens Hausgeraete | oven |
US7708915B2 (en) | 2004-05-06 | 2010-05-04 | Castor Trevor P | Polymer microspheres/nanospheres and encapsulating therapeutic proteins therein |
US20020130430A1 (en) * | 2000-12-29 | 2002-09-19 | Castor Trevor Percival | Methods for making polymer microspheres/nanospheres and encapsulating therapeutic proteins and other products |
JP4148658B2 (en) * | 2001-04-18 | 2008-09-10 | 財団法人かがわ産業支援財団 | Pattern formation method |
US6595630B2 (en) * | 2001-07-12 | 2003-07-22 | Eastman Kodak Company | Method and apparatus for controlling depth of deposition of a solvent free functional material in a receiver |
CN1525999A (en) | 2001-07-12 | 2004-09-01 | ��˹���´﹫˾ | A compressed fluid formulation |
GB0208742D0 (en) | 2002-04-17 | 2002-05-29 | Bradford Particle Design Ltd | Particulate materials |
GB0117696D0 (en) * | 2001-07-20 | 2001-09-12 | Bradford Particle Design Plc | Particle information |
EP1435916B1 (en) * | 2001-10-10 | 2006-04-26 | Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals Inc. | Powder processing with pressurized gaseous fluids |
CA2467703A1 (en) * | 2001-11-21 | 2003-06-05 | University Of Massachusetts | Mesoporous materials and methods |
WO2003053895A2 (en) * | 2001-12-12 | 2003-07-03 | E.I. Du Pont De Nemours And Company | Copper deposition using copper formate complexes |
US6655796B2 (en) | 2001-12-20 | 2003-12-02 | Eastman Kodak Company | Post-print treatment for ink jet printing apparatus |
GB0205868D0 (en) * | 2002-03-13 | 2002-04-24 | Univ Nottingham | Polymer composite with internally distributed deposition matter |
US6653236B2 (en) * | 2002-03-29 | 2003-11-25 | Micron Technology, Inc. | Methods of forming metal-containing films over surfaces of semiconductor substrates; and semiconductor constructions |
US7341947B2 (en) * | 2002-03-29 | 2008-03-11 | Micron Technology, Inc. | Methods of forming metal-containing films over surfaces of semiconductor substrates |
US7582284B2 (en) * | 2002-04-17 | 2009-09-01 | Nektar Therapeutics | Particulate materials |
GB0216562D0 (en) * | 2002-04-25 | 2002-08-28 | Bradford Particle Design Ltd | Particulate materials |
US9339459B2 (en) | 2003-04-24 | 2016-05-17 | Nektar Therapeutics | Particulate materials |
US7241334B2 (en) * | 2002-05-23 | 2007-07-10 | Columbian Chemicals Company | Sulfonated carbonaceous materials |
CA2486765A1 (en) * | 2002-05-23 | 2003-12-04 | Columbian Chemicals Company | Conducting polymer-grafted carbon material for fuel cell applications |
US7195834B2 (en) * | 2002-05-23 | 2007-03-27 | Columbian Chemicals Company | Metallized conducting polymer-grafted carbon material and method for making |
US7390441B2 (en) * | 2002-05-23 | 2008-06-24 | Columbian Chemicals Company | Sulfonated conducting polymer-grafted carbon material for fuel cell applications |
US7413683B2 (en) | 2002-05-23 | 2008-08-19 | Columbian Chemicals Company | Sulfonated conducting polymer-grafted carbon material for fuel cell applications |
US7459103B2 (en) | 2002-05-23 | 2008-12-02 | Columbian Chemicals Company | Conducting polymer-grafted carbon material for fuel cell applications |
US6780475B2 (en) | 2002-05-28 | 2004-08-24 | Battelle Memorial Institute | Electrostatic deposition of particles generated from rapid expansion of supercritical fluid solutions |
US6749902B2 (en) | 2002-05-28 | 2004-06-15 | Battelle Memorial Institute | Methods for producing films using supercritical fluid |
US6756084B2 (en) | 2002-05-28 | 2004-06-29 | Battelle Memorial Institute | Electrostatic deposition of particles generated from rapid expansion of supercritical fluid solutions |
US6692094B1 (en) | 2002-07-23 | 2004-02-17 | Eastman Kodak Company | Apparatus and method of material deposition using compressed fluids |
WO2004044281A2 (en) * | 2002-11-12 | 2004-05-27 | The Regents Of The University Of California | Nano-porous fibers and protein membranes |
US6790483B2 (en) * | 2002-12-06 | 2004-09-14 | Eastman Kodak Company | Method for producing patterned deposition from compressed fluid |
US6843556B2 (en) * | 2002-12-06 | 2005-01-18 | Eastman Kodak Company | System for producing patterned deposition from compressed fluid in a dual controlled deposition chamber |
US6780249B2 (en) * | 2002-12-06 | 2004-08-24 | Eastman Kodak Company | System for producing patterned deposition from compressed fluid in a partially opened deposition chamber |
US20040108060A1 (en) * | 2002-12-06 | 2004-06-10 | Eastman Kodak Company | System for producing patterned deposition from compressed fluids |
CA2508870C (en) * | 2002-12-30 | 2012-10-16 | Nektar Therapeutics | Prefilming atomizer |
US7217750B2 (en) * | 2003-01-20 | 2007-05-15 | Northern Technologies International Corporation | Process for incorporating one or more materials into a polymer composition and products produced thereby |
US7217749B2 (en) * | 2003-01-20 | 2007-05-15 | Northern Technologies International Corporation | Process for infusing an alkali metal nitrite into a synthetic resinous material |
US7083748B2 (en) * | 2003-02-07 | 2006-08-01 | Ferro Corporation | Method and apparatus for continuous particle production using supercritical fluid |
CA2517149A1 (en) * | 2003-03-07 | 2004-09-16 | University College Cork - National University Of Ireland, Cork | A process for the synthesis of a chromatographic phase |
KR20060015587A (en) * | 2003-05-08 | 2006-02-17 | 넥타 쎄라퓨틱스 유케이 리미티드 | Particulate materials |
US20060008531A1 (en) * | 2003-05-08 | 2006-01-12 | Ferro Corporation | Method for producing solid-lipid composite drug particles |
US6958308B2 (en) * | 2004-03-16 | 2005-10-25 | Columbian Chemicals Company | Deposition of dispersed metal particles onto substrates using supercritical fluids |
US7220456B2 (en) * | 2004-03-31 | 2007-05-22 | Eastman Kodak Company | Process for the selective deposition of particulate material |
US7223445B2 (en) * | 2004-03-31 | 2007-05-29 | Eastman Kodak Company | Process for the deposition of uniform layer of particulate material |
US20050218076A1 (en) * | 2004-03-31 | 2005-10-06 | Eastman Kodak Company | Process for the formation of particulate material |
US7909263B2 (en) * | 2004-07-08 | 2011-03-22 | Cube Technology, Inc. | Method of dispersing fine particles in a spray |
US20060068987A1 (en) * | 2004-09-24 | 2006-03-30 | Srinivas Bollepalli | Carbon supported catalyst having reduced water retention |
US8079838B2 (en) * | 2005-03-16 | 2011-12-20 | Horiba, Ltd. | Pure particle generator |
US7153626B2 (en) * | 2005-05-23 | 2006-12-26 | Eastman Kodak Company | Method of forming dye donor element |
US7444934B2 (en) * | 2005-05-24 | 2008-11-04 | Micron Technology, Inc. | Supercritical fluid-assisted direct write for printing integrated circuits |
US20070009564A1 (en) * | 2005-06-22 | 2007-01-11 | Mcclain James B | Drug/polymer composite materials and methods of making the same |
WO2007011708A2 (en) | 2005-07-15 | 2007-01-25 | Micell Technologies, Inc. | Stent with polymer coating containing amorphous rapamycin |
KR101406415B1 (en) | 2005-07-15 | 2014-06-19 | 미셀 테크놀로지즈, 인코포레이티드 | Polymer coatings containing drug powder of controlled morphology |
DE102005057685A1 (en) * | 2005-12-01 | 2007-06-06 | Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma Gmbh & Co. Kg | Inhaler and storage for a dry drug formulation and methods and use thereof |
AU2007243268B2 (en) | 2006-04-26 | 2013-06-13 | Micell Technologies, Inc. | Coatings containing multiple drugs |
WO2008052000A2 (en) * | 2006-10-23 | 2008-05-02 | Micell Technologies, Inc. | Holder for electrically charging a substrate during coating |
US11426494B2 (en) | 2007-01-08 | 2022-08-30 | MT Acquisition Holdings LLC | Stents having biodegradable layers |
JP5603598B2 (en) | 2007-01-08 | 2014-10-08 | ミセル テクノロジーズ、インコーポレイテッド | Stent with biodegradable layer |
PL2425820T3 (en) * | 2007-02-11 | 2015-08-31 | Map Pharmaceuticals Inc | Method of therapeutic administration of dhe to enable rapid relief of migraine while minimizing side effect profile |
SG183035A1 (en) * | 2007-04-17 | 2012-08-30 | Micell Technologies Inc | Stents having biodegradable layers |
WO2008148013A1 (en) | 2007-05-25 | 2008-12-04 | Micell Technologies, Inc. | Polymer films for medical device coating |
CA2692946C (en) * | 2007-06-29 | 2014-11-18 | Swetree Technologies Ab | Method to prepare superhydrophobic surfaces on solid bodies by rapid expansion solutions |
WO2009051780A1 (en) * | 2007-10-19 | 2009-04-23 | Micell Technologies, Inc. | Drug coated stents |
BRPI0910969B8 (en) * | 2008-04-17 | 2021-06-22 | Micell Technologies Inc | device |
GB0812742D0 (en) * | 2008-07-11 | 2008-08-20 | Critical Pharmaceuticals Ltd | Process |
JP2011528275A (en) | 2008-07-17 | 2011-11-17 | ミセル テクノロジーズ,インク. | Drug delivery medical device |
US8834913B2 (en) * | 2008-12-26 | 2014-09-16 | Battelle Memorial Institute | Medical implants and methods of making medical implants |
EP2410954A4 (en) * | 2009-03-23 | 2014-03-05 | Micell Technologies Inc | Peripheral stents having layers |
FR2943543B1 (en) | 2009-03-31 | 2013-02-08 | Separex Sa | PROCESS FOR PREPARING PHARMACEUTICAL COMPOSITIONS COMPRISING FINE PARTICLES OF ACTIVE SUBSTANCE. |
FR2943539B1 (en) | 2009-03-31 | 2011-07-22 | Ethypharm Sa | PHARMACEUTICAL COMPOSITION COMPRISING A IMMUNOSUPPRESSIVE MACROLIDE OF THE LIMUS FAMILY. |
JP2012522589A (en) * | 2009-04-01 | 2012-09-27 | ミシェル テクノロジーズ,インコーポレイテッド | Covered stent |
EP3366326A1 (en) | 2009-04-17 | 2018-08-29 | Micell Technologies, Inc. | Stents having controlled elution |
US20110171141A1 (en) * | 2009-06-26 | 2011-07-14 | Kellerman Donald J | Administration of dihydroergotamine mesylate particles using a metered dose inhaler |
EP2453834A4 (en) | 2009-07-16 | 2014-04-16 | Micell Technologies Inc | Drug delivery medical device |
WO2011015550A1 (en) * | 2009-08-03 | 2011-02-10 | Heliatek Gmbh | Evaporator system for organic coatings and components |
EP2531140B1 (en) * | 2010-02-02 | 2017-11-01 | Micell Technologies, Inc. | Stent and stent delivery system with improved deliverability |
US8795762B2 (en) * | 2010-03-26 | 2014-08-05 | Battelle Memorial Institute | System and method for enhanced electrostatic deposition and surface coatings |
EP2560576B1 (en) | 2010-04-22 | 2018-07-18 | Micell Technologies, Inc. | Stents and other devices having extracellular matrix coating |
FR2960167B1 (en) | 2010-05-21 | 2013-02-08 | Centre Nat Rech Scient | METHOD FOR OBTAINING THIN LAYERS |
WO2012009684A2 (en) | 2010-07-16 | 2012-01-19 | Micell Technologies, Inc. | Drug delivery medical device |
US9808030B2 (en) | 2011-02-11 | 2017-11-07 | Grain Processing Corporation | Salt composition |
WO2012166819A1 (en) | 2011-05-31 | 2012-12-06 | Micell Technologies, Inc. | System and process for formation of a time-released, drug-eluting transferable coating |
WO2013012689A1 (en) | 2011-07-15 | 2013-01-24 | Micell Technologies, Inc. | Drug delivery medical device |
JP2014534839A (en) * | 2011-10-12 | 2014-12-25 | エンパイア テクノロジー ディベロップメント エルエルシー | Silicon carbonate composition and method for preparing and using the same |
US10188772B2 (en) | 2011-10-18 | 2019-01-29 | Micell Technologies, Inc. | Drug delivery medical device |
EP2967803B1 (en) | 2013-03-12 | 2023-12-27 | Micell Technologies, Inc. | Bioabsorbable biomedical implants |
KR102079613B1 (en) | 2013-05-15 | 2020-02-20 | 미셀 테크놀로지즈, 인코포레이티드 | Bioabsorbable biomedical implants |
FR3075829B1 (en) * | 2017-12-26 | 2020-09-04 | Safran Ceram | METHOD AND DEVICE FOR DEPOSITING A COATING ON A CONTINUOUS FIBER |
JP6612418B1 (en) * | 2018-11-26 | 2019-11-27 | 株式会社金星 | Gas conveyance type fine powder quantitative supply method and system |
JP2020199451A (en) * | 2019-06-10 | 2020-12-17 | 株式会社アルバック | Film forming device and film forming method |
Family Cites Families (4)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
FR65919E (en) * | 1953-02-16 | 1956-03-27 | ||
US3981957A (en) * | 1975-08-06 | 1976-09-21 | Exxon Research And Engineering Company | Process for preparing finely divided polymers |
US4012461A (en) * | 1975-08-06 | 1977-03-15 | Exxon Research And Engineering Company | Process for preparing polymer powders |
DE2853066A1 (en) * | 1978-12-08 | 1980-06-26 | August Prof Dipl Phys D Winsel | Monomolecular or very thin coating prodn. on porous material - by contact with supercritical gas contg. solid or liq. coating material in soln. |
-
1983
- 1983-09-01 US US06/528,723 patent/US4582731A/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
-
1984
- 1984-08-28 DE DE8484903577T patent/DE3467863D1/en not_active Expired
- 1984-08-28 AT AT84903577T patent/ATE31152T1/en not_active IP Right Cessation
- 1984-08-28 JP JP59503580A patent/JPS61500210A/en active Granted
- 1984-08-28 CA CA000461977A patent/CA1260381A/en not_active Expired
- 1984-08-28 EP EP84903577A patent/EP0157827B1/en not_active Expired
- 1984-08-28 WO PCT/US1984/001386 patent/WO1985000993A1/en active IP Right Grant
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
DE3467863D1 (en) | 1988-01-14 |
JPS61500210A (en) | 1986-02-06 |
US4582731A (en) | 1986-04-15 |
EP0157827A1 (en) | 1985-10-16 |
WO1985000993A1 (en) | 1985-03-14 |
JPH0419910B2 (en) | 1992-03-31 |
EP0157827B1 (en) | 1987-12-02 |
ATE31152T1 (en) | 1987-12-15 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
CA1260381A (en) | Supercritical fluid molecular spray film deposition and powder formation | |
US4734227A (en) | Method of making supercritical fluid molecular spray films, powder and fibers | |
US4734451A (en) | Supercritical fluid molecular spray thin films and fine powders | |
Fazilleau et al. | Phenomena involved in suspension plasma spraying part 1: Suspension injection and behavior | |
JP3831165B2 (en) | Liquid transport device | |
US6471327B2 (en) | Apparatus and method of delivering a focused beam of a thermodynamically stable/metastable mixture of a functional material in a dense fluid onto a receiver | |
US8011296B2 (en) | Supercritical fluid-assisted direct write for printing integrated circuits | |
EP0388927B1 (en) | Methods and apparatus for obtaining a feathered spray | |
EP0270656A1 (en) | Vapour deposition of monomer fluids. | |
KR101518545B1 (en) | Apparatus for Coating Graphene Film Using Cold Spray | |
Gulyaev | Production and modification of hollow powders in plasma under controlled pressure | |
US11376657B2 (en) | Porous materials via freeze-casting of metal salt solutions | |
Petsi et al. | Potential flow inside an evaporating cylindrical line | |
JP2006299335A (en) | Film deposition method, film deposition apparatus used for the same, and vaporization device | |
Ksibi et al. | Formation of fine powders of caffeine by RESS | |
WO2020161863A1 (en) | Vacuum-freeze drying method and vacuum-freeze drying device | |
Ogawa et al. | The direct injection of liquid droplets into low pressure plasmas | |
Dautov et al. | Increasing thermal and mechanical properties of thermal barrier coatings by suspension plasma spraying technology | |
Wittmann et al. | Control of the Injection of an Alumina Suspension Containing Nanograins in a dc Plasma | |
Bayazitoglu et al. | Metal vapor condensation in a converging nozzle | |
Lin et al. | Precipitation of submicrometer‐sized poly (methyl methacrylate) particles with a compressed fluid antisolvent | |
Ksibi et al. | Powder structure transition under the recrystallization conditions in the RESS process | |
KR100594761B1 (en) | Apparatus and Method for Manufacturing Inflammable metal powder | |
JP2001011635A (en) | Liquid material evaporator | |
FR2831466A1 (en) | POWDER MANUFACTURING DEVICE BY AEROSOL PYROLYSIS |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
MKEX | Expiry |