CA1263547A - Contact sensor for measuring dental occlusion - Google Patents
Contact sensor for measuring dental occlusionInfo
- Publication number
- CA1263547A CA1263547A CA000505274A CA505274A CA1263547A CA 1263547 A CA1263547 A CA 1263547A CA 000505274 A CA000505274 A CA 000505274A CA 505274 A CA505274 A CA 505274A CA 1263547 A CA1263547 A CA 1263547A
- Authority
- CA
- Canada
- Prior art keywords
- electrodes
- row
- electrode
- resistive
- column
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Expired
Links
Classifications
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61C—DENTISTRY; APPARATUS OR METHODS FOR ORAL OR DENTAL HYGIENE
- A61C9/00—Impression cups, i.e. impression trays; Impression methods
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01L—MEASURING FORCE, STRESS, TORQUE, WORK, MECHANICAL POWER, MECHANICAL EFFICIENCY, OR FLUID PRESSURE
- G01L1/00—Measuring force or stress, in general
- G01L1/20—Measuring force or stress, in general by measuring variations in ohmic resistance of solid materials or of electrically-conductive fluids; by making use of electrokinetic cells, i.e. liquid-containing cells wherein an electrical potential is produced or varied upon the application of stress
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61C—DENTISTRY; APPARATUS OR METHODS FOR ORAL OR DENTAL HYGIENE
- A61C19/00—Dental auxiliary appliances
- A61C19/04—Measuring instruments specially adapted for dentistry
- A61C19/05—Measuring instruments specially adapted for dentistry for determining occlusion
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01L—MEASURING FORCE, STRESS, TORQUE, WORK, MECHANICAL POWER, MECHANICAL EFFICIENCY, OR FLUID PRESSURE
- G01L1/00—Measuring force or stress, in general
- G01L1/20—Measuring force or stress, in general by measuring variations in ohmic resistance of solid materials or of electrically-conductive fluids; by making use of electrokinetic cells, i.e. liquid-containing cells wherein an electrical potential is produced or varied upon the application of stress
- G01L1/205—Measuring force or stress, in general by measuring variations in ohmic resistance of solid materials or of electrically-conductive fluids; by making use of electrokinetic cells, i.e. liquid-containing cells wherein an electrical potential is produced or varied upon the application of stress using distributed sensing elements
Abstract
A Contact Sensor For Measuring Dental Occlusion Abstract A contact sensor for detecting points on a grid where the sensor is being contacted on opposing sides by teeth surfaces or other contacting points. The contact sensor includes two sets of parallel electrodes (54, 64) which are each formed on a thin, flexible supporting sheet (52, 62).
The electrodes are coated with a thin, resistive coating (72). Two such electrode structures (50, 60) are oriented at approximatly right angles to create a grid (88) where the intersecting electrodes cross seperated by the resistive coatings (72). The resistive coatings may be made from conventional resistive inks and are optionally seperated by a seperation material (70), such as talcum or mesh. In the absence of an external force, the material between the electrodes sets provides a high resistance between intersecting electrodes. The novel composition of the intermediate layer (70) results in a structure which provides a "switching" effect such that the resistance between electrodes is very high where there is no external pressure and changes to a comparatively low value at locations where external pressure is applied by two contacting points or surfaces. The sensor output is dynamic in the sense that the resistance will change back and forth between high and low resistance states as external pressure is repeatedly applied and removed. The sensor may be made extremely thin and can provide high resolution capable of distinguishing between contact points seperated by 0.050 inches or less.
Additionally, the sensor output may be provided by means of a small computer or similar digital processor which monitors the signals from the sensor grid and which provides an ouput which indicates the variation in contacting points with time.
The electrodes are coated with a thin, resistive coating (72). Two such electrode structures (50, 60) are oriented at approximatly right angles to create a grid (88) where the intersecting electrodes cross seperated by the resistive coatings (72). The resistive coatings may be made from conventional resistive inks and are optionally seperated by a seperation material (70), such as talcum or mesh. In the absence of an external force, the material between the electrodes sets provides a high resistance between intersecting electrodes. The novel composition of the intermediate layer (70) results in a structure which provides a "switching" effect such that the resistance between electrodes is very high where there is no external pressure and changes to a comparatively low value at locations where external pressure is applied by two contacting points or surfaces. The sensor output is dynamic in the sense that the resistance will change back and forth between high and low resistance states as external pressure is repeatedly applied and removed. The sensor may be made extremely thin and can provide high resolution capable of distinguishing between contact points seperated by 0.050 inches or less.
Additionally, the sensor output may be provided by means of a small computer or similar digital processor which monitors the signals from the sensor grid and which provides an ouput which indicates the variation in contacting points with time.
Description
~Z63~7 Description A Contact Sensor For Measuring Dental Occlusion -Technical Field This invention is related to the field of contact sensors, and more particularly to the field of dental occlusal sensors for providing measurements of dental contact points as a patient's jaw is closed.
Background Art -It is frequently desirable or necessary in performing dental diagnostic procedures to measure the occlusion, or points of contact, between a patient's teeth as the patient closes his or her jaws. Occlusion measurements are necessary in prescribing and fitting many dental appliance~
such as false teeth or orthodontic devices. Such measurements enable the user to determine where the teeth first contact each other, disclosing high spots and other useful information.
In order to provide an accurate measurement of the occlusion, an occlusal measuring device must be extremely thin so as not to perturb the normal dental alignment. A
sensor must also have a very high resolution to provide useful information and distinguish between contact and non-contact points of the teeth. Additionally, a practical sensor must be safe for oral use and should be capable of being used by non-technical personel with minimal training.
To date, the types of occ~usal sensors available to dentists for measuring occlusion have been limited. The most common method of measuring dental occlusion is by means of a piece of carbon-paper like materal upon which a patient bites down. The points of contact are indicated by the deposit of a marking substance on the dental surfaces.
This method is rapid to use and inexpensive, but provides limited information. The resolution i5 not very great, ~ "~
~tj35~7 especially where complex dental interactions are involved, and there is no easy method to retain a permanent record in a patient's files for later comparison.
Another occlusal sensor uses a thin piece of plastic which is bitten to proYide an imprint of the occlusion. The occlusion is read by illuminating the plastic with polarized light which indicates the points of contact b~
different colors. Disadvantages of this method include a relatively thick sensor, a high degree of training necessary to interpret the results, and a relatively complex procedure to create the imprint pattern.
Other methods exist for performing occlusal analysis, including x-rays and casts of a patient's bite, but these methods are expensive, time consuming, and in general are not suitable for large scale use in dental offices. A
simple and inexpensive method of providing Gcclusal measurements which have a high resolution and which are capable of being permanently retained would be of great value to dentists and others concerned with occlusal measurements.
~isclosure o~ the Invention The present invention includes a unique contact sensor for detecting points on a grid where the sensor is being contacted on opposing sides by teeth surfaces. The sensor is extremely thin, on the order of a few thousands of an inch thick, and can provida high resolution capa~le of distinguishing between contact points seperated by Q.050 inches or less.
Brie~ly, the contact sensor includes two sets of parallel electrodes which are each formed on a thin, ~lexible supporting sheet. The electrodes are then coated with a thin, resistive coating. Two such electrode structures are oriented at approximatly right angles to create a grid where the intersecting electrodes cross. The ~f~3~7 electrodes are then formed into a sheet with the electorde3 beinq seperatsd by a novel intermediate layer.
In the absence of an external force, the intermediate layer provides a high resistance between intersecting electrodes. The novel composition of the intermediate layer results in a structure which provides a "switching"
ef~ect such that the resistance between electrodes is very high where therP is no e~ternal pressure and changes to a comparativel~ low value at locations where external pressure is applied by two contacting points or surfaces.
The sensor output is dynamic in the sense that the resistance will change back and forth between high and low resistance state~ as external pressure is repeatedly applied and removed. Thus, repeated measurements of contacting points may be made by a single sensor.
Although the contact sensor has many possible applications, it is ideally suited for measuring dental occlusion. The extreme thinness of the sensor allows occlusion to be measured with little or no alteration of a patient's normal bite, and the high resolution provides detailed information to a dentist or other user about the interaction of denta~ surfaces. The binary switching action of the inter-electrode resistance allows simple circuitry to reliably detect contacting and non-contacting points of a patient's teeth as the sensor is bitten and contact is made between the teeth. The sensor may be fabricated very inexpensively. This allows a sensor to be discarded after use by one patient, thus eliminating the necessity of sterilization between patients.
~dditionally, the sensor output may be provided by means of a small computer or similar digital processor which monitors the signals from the sensor grid and which provides an ouput which indicates the variation in dental occlusion with time. Since multiple contacts may be measured at each electrode intersection, the changing patterns of dantal occlusion as a patients bites down on ~Z~3~
the sensor can be monitored to provide a total representation of the patient's occlusion as the jaw is closed. This information is extremely valuable in diagnosing and treating certain dental problems. The ability to take such measurements quickly and to keep a permanent record of the occlusion is valuable in providing later follow up care.
Brief Description of Drawinqs The invention may be more fully understood by reading the following description of the preferred embodiment in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, of which:
Fig. 1 shows the overall construction of the sensor of the invention;
Fig. 2 shows a magnified view of the relationship of the electrodes to the backing and resistive coating;
Fig. 3 is a microscopic view of the interface between resistive coatings on facing electrode arrays;
Fig. 4 shows one method by which a dental occlusal sensor may be fabricated as a single piece;
Fig. 5 shows an exemplary structure for oral use of an occlusal sensor;
Fig. 6 shows circuitry for measuring the resistance of electrode array points in a sengor;
Fig. 7 shows one procedure by which a co~puter may control the circuitry of Fig. 6; and FigsO 8A and 8B are useful in estimating the through and inter-electrode resistances of a sensor array for different electrode spacings.
Best Mode for Carrying Out the Invention Referring to Fig. 1, the basic structure of the contact sensor used in the present invention is shown. A top layer 50 is fabricated as discussed in detail below. Top layer 50 includes a flexible backing 52 on which are formed parallel rows of electrodes 54. Each electrode is ~3~i~7 connected to a respective terminal 56 through which electrical contact to the electrode is made. A bottom layer 60 is similarly constructed and includes multiple electrodes 64 fromed on a backing 6~ and respectively connected to terminals 66. A seperation layer 70 is normally included between the top and bottom layers 60 and 70.
Referring to Fig. 2, the construction of the top and bottom layers is shown in more detail. The backing 52 provides a flexible support for electrodes 54. In the preferred embodiment described herein, backing 52 is formed of a polyester film such as Mylar. Other similar films such as Kapton, manufactured by DuPont, may be used for the~
backing. These materials combine thinness and strength in a material which can be made into a sterile, waterproof package suitable for oral use. Other materials may be used for the backing.
In the preferred embodiment, electrodes 54 are formed via know methods for making flexible printed circuits. A
thin copper layer is attached to the backing 52 with an adhesive 58. The electrode pattern is applied to the copper layer with photo-resist, and the unwanted copper is then etched away. Other methods may be used to fabricate the electrodes including directly printing the electrodes on the backing using a conducting ink.
Next, the electrodes are coated with a resistive coating 72. Coating 72 may be formed of a resistive ink.
Resistive inks are materials which can be printed or otherwise applied in thin coatings and which serve to limit the current flowing thsrethrough. The technology of formulating and applying resistive inks is well developed.
See, for example, Screen Printing Electronic Circuits, by Albert Kasoloff, 1980, and National Bureau of Standards Circular No. 530, U.S. Government Printing Office.
In the preferred embodiment, a resistive coating is used which includes graphite in an acetone or keytone ~%63~
solvent. The resistive coating should be applied in as thin a layer as possible. The preferred thickness is in the range of 1/2 to 2 mils thicko In the preferred embodiment described below, the resistive coating is formed by combining an insulating inX having a titanium dioxide filler, vinyl resin binder, and butyl cellosolve acetate solvent with a conductive ink containing graphite, vinyl resin, and butyl cellosolve acetate. Such inks are commercially available from many sources, e.g., Electrodag lo 423SS conductive ink and SS 24210 insulating ink, produced by Acheson Colloids Company, Port Huron, Michigan. The resistance of the coating can be varied by changing the relative proportions of the insulating and conductive components of the coating. In the preferred embodiment, 15 the coating is composed of the above-described formulation having twenty percent conductive and eighty percent insulative inks by ~Jeight. The coating is applied through a 200 mesh polyester screen and room dried. The ¢oating is preferra~ly one-half mil thick with a resistivity of 60 to 100 kilohms per square.
To form the sensor, two layers as shown in Fig. 2 are placed together with the electrodes at angles to each other, as shown in Fig. 1, in a sandwich arrangement with the resistive coatings 72 facing one another and optionally seperated with a seperation layer 70, as discussed below.
It has been discovered that a sensor constructed in accordance with the procedure set forth above has the characteristic that the resistance between electodes as a function o~ applied pressure is non-linear. Application of an external force has minimal effect on the resistance between opposing electrodes at the pressure point until a threshold point is reached, at which point the resistance between the opposing electrodes abruptly decreases. For the sensor and resistive coating formulation described above, the resistance changes from a value on the order of several megohms to a value on the order of one kilohm. As 5~
a result of this phenomenon, the described sensor may be used to detect contacting points using relatively simple circuitry while maintaining a very high signal to noise ratio in the output.
When two electrode layers such as that shown in Fig. 2 are combined in a sensor with the resistive coatings 72 in direct contact, it has been found that the threshold force required to switch from the high resistance state to the low resistance state is variable, resulting in possible spurious readings. A seperation layer 70, as shown in Fig.
1, may be added to the sensor to improve its performance.
The primary requirements of the seperation layer are that it be non-conductive, flexible, and as thin as possible.
Various materials may be used as the seperation layer.
Materials which have been used and found suitable include nylon mesh, non-conducting paints including polymer-based paints such as Acheson Electrodag SS24210 or latex paint, and talcum powder.
Of these materi.als, talcum powder has provided the best results. In use, a thin layer of talcum powder is applied to both of the resistive coatings. The excess talcum powder is removed with a low velocity s~ream of air, such as by blowing off the powder, the powder remaining providing the seperation layer.
Nylon mesh has also prove to be useful as a seperation layer. Nylon mesh reults in a higher threshold force to switch the interelectxode resistance from high t~ low resistance states, however using such a mesh tends to decrease the ability of the sensor to accurately detect continuous lines or surfaces of contact.
While the reason for the switching effect described above has not been precisely determined, the following is believed to be the explanation. The resistive coating, when applied, has a gritty surface. When two alectrode layers are combined with the resistive coakings facing one another, the structure is believed to have the ~Z~ii4~
configuration shown in Fig. 3. In Fig. 3, the two resistive layers 58 contact each other along an interface 80. Due to the grittiness of the surface, the contacting area is very small with only isolated high points of the opposing coatings 58 actually touching. When pressure is applied, the coating elastically deforms creating a larger area of ~ontact and a lower resistance. It is believed that the threshold effect is at least partially due to the need to overcome the starting frictional forces which resist any sliding action between the two coatings until a threshold level is exceeded. It is further believed that the seperation layers serve to provide a more constant interface between the two layers, thus providing for a more even threshold force level.
The above described sensor also works when only the resistive coating is applied to only one of the electrode arrays, although the sensor sensitivity is more variable than with the construction using two coatings. A
seperation layer may optionally be used on top of the resistive coating, and such a seperation layer reduces the variability of the threshold force, similarly to the two coating sensor. Using two coatings is preferred, however.
The ~ensor of the pre.sent invention is capable of very hi~h resolution. Sensors ~ave been built in accordance with the above procedure which have electrode spacings of 0.050 inches. The principal factor limiting resolution is the capability of available methods to form thin electrode grids. ~he smallest electrode spacing which can now be reliably achieved using conventional printed circuit or conductive ink deposition methods is approximately 0.010 inches. Finer resolution would appear to be achievable.
Referring to Fig. 8~, the inter trace resistance Ri ~
the resistive coating 72 between electrodes is represented by resistor 82. The through resistance Rt from each electrode to the surface is represented by resistor 84.
The seperation between electrodes is W.
i35~7 g The resistance through a specific configuration is inversely proportional to the cross-sectional area and proportional to the length through which the current flows~
The through resistance Rt depends upon the total surface area through which a current flows. The pattern of this current flow is illustrated in Fig. 8B by dotted current lines 86 from electrode 54 to the surface of the resistive coating 72. The nature of this flow makes ~he through resistance difficult to calculate analytically. From experimental measurements, however, it is known that this resistance is on the order of a few thousand ohms.
The inter-electrode resistance Ri is easier to calculate since the length of the resistive path is long compared to the cross-sectional area resulting in a generally linear current flow. Thus, the inter-electrode resistance may be expressed as Ri = Kc x A
where Kc i~ a proportionality constant, A is the cross-sectional area of the resistive coating between ~5 traces, and W is the electrode seperation. For an electrode spacing of 0.050 inches and using the electrode and sensor structure described above, Ri is about five megohms. From the above equation, the interel~ctrode resistance is proportional to W. Reducing W by a factor of ten to 0.005 inches will result in a value for Rt on the order o~ 500 kilohms. Thus, the inter-electrode resistance will still be much larger that the through resistance for electrode spacings of 0.005 inches, which is finer than can be achieved with conventional processes.
A practical sensor for use in dental applications should preferrably be disposable to eliminate the need for , ~2~S47 sterilization between patients. Fig. 4 shows the configuration ~or an electrode layer in which the top and bottom electrode arra~s are simultaneously formed on a single backing sheet. In Fig. 4, a backing sheet 52 has column electrodes 66 formed on one half thereof and row electrodes 54 formed on the other half. The row electrodes have an area 88 where the teeth make contact with each other from opposite sides of the sensor. Conductive paths 96 are in the area between the contacting surfaces of the teeth and serve to connect row electrodes 88. The row and column electrodes extend to either end of the sheet 52 where a connector is attached at the regions denoted by dottet lines 87 to provide electrical contact to tha electrodes. The electrodes 90 connect row ele~trodes 54 to the connector region 87.
After the electrodes are formed, the structure shown in Fig. 4 has a resistive coating and optional seperation layer applied thereto, as described above. The backing sheet 52 is then fo:Lded at line 89 so that the row and column electrodes face one another, and the structure thus formed is held together by applying an adhesive or tape to the edge portions 91 of the folded sensor. To make a dental occlusal sensor, the sensor shown in Fig. 4 may be fabricated into a configuration suitable for oral use, such as that shown in Fig. 5. In Fig. 5., the sensor 60 is shown with the electrode area 88 cross-hatched to indicate where a patient would bite down on the sensor. The signals from the sensor are applied to the measurment electronics via a multiconductor cable 94 which is attached to the sensor via a connector 92. Signals from the electrodes in area 88 are applied to the connector 92 via conductors within the supporting sheet 90, as described above with reference to Fig. 4. Connector 92 may make contact directly to the electrode traces 87 on the sensor 60 without the necessity for having a matching connector piece - attached to the sensor. in this manner, an inexpensive -- ~Lzf(j3~L7 oral sensor may be easily fabricated, allowing for the use of disposable sensors. This greatly increases the ease of use, since sterilization between patients is not required, and also reduces the posibility of tranmission of germs due 5 to incomplete sterilization of sensors between uses.
Referring to Fig. 6, a circuit is shown for reading the sensor output in conjuction with a personal computer.
It should be appreciated that a dedicated digital controller or other type of processor could e~ually well be used in place of the computer, and the use of such alternate processors may be preferrable in some applications. In the preferred embodiment, computer 170 is an IBM Personal Computer which is interfaced to the circuitry shown through an interface circuit 160. The design o~ interface 160 will be readily apparent to one of ordinary skill in the art. An example of such an interfaca circuit which will work with the IBM PC is shown and described in the I_ PC Technical Reference Manual, Vol. 2, at pages "prototype card 9."
In Fig. 6, a sensor 102 includes of a plurality of column electrodes 100, designated as Cl through Cnl and a plurality of row electrodes 98, designated as Rl through Rn. In the preferred embodiment, the sensor includes 48 rows and 48 columns. At each intersection of a row and column is a resistor 104 and switch 106. Resistors 104 have a resistance on the order one kilohm. The plurality of resistors 104 represent the low resistance between opposing electrodes when contact is detected. The closing of switches 106 represents the switching from a high to low resistive state of the interelectrode resistance by the closing of the corresponding switch 106. Each intersection has a measureable resistance of several megohms, not represented in Fig. ~, in the absence of contact at that intersection.
Each row electrode is driven by the output of an asocicated amplifier 108, shown in Fig. 6 as unity gain ~2~3~i4~
buffer amplifiers. The input to each amplifier 108 is connected to ground through a resistor 110 and also to an output from multiplexer 112. The common terminal terminal of multiplexer 112 is connected to a positive voltage fV.
Normally, the inputs to amplifiers 103 are held at ground porential by resistors 110. As described below, in response to digital inputs from row counter 114, multiplexer 112 sequentially connects the inputs to each row-driver amplifier 108 to the +V potential, causing the 0 corresponding row electrode to also go to a high potential.
Row counter 114 is incremented by a clock signal from interface circuit 160, as described in more de~ail below.
Each of the column electrodes is connected to an individua~ input to a 48-to-1 multiplexer 116. Column counter 118 is incremented by a carry signal from row counter 114 after a~l the points along each row have been measured. In response to inputs from a column counter 118, multiplexer 116 sequentially connects aach column electrode to the input to an amplifier circuit 120.
Amplifier 120 includes an op-amp 123 and feedback resistor 121. The non-inverting input of op-amp 120 is grounded, and feedback resistor 121 is connected from the op-amp output to the inverting input. Thus, the inverting input to the op-amp is a virtual ground, and the voltage at the output of the op-amp is a function of the current flowing into the inverting input. Amplifier 120 is connected as an inverting amplifier.
The output signal from amplifier 120 is applied to a threshold detector 122, including a comparator 124 and a potentiometer 126. Comparator 122 provides a digital signal to a register 130, depending on whether the output voltage from amplifier 120 is above or below the threshold level selected by potentiometer 126, as discussed below.
The measurement circuit operates in the following manner. Assume that the circuitry has selected column C2 and row R2, which will measure the resistance of the 3 ZS~5~3L'7 electrode intersection represented by resistor 140 and switch 142. Counter 114 and multiplexer 112 apply a high voltage to row electrode R2 via the corresponding amplifier 108. All other row electrodes are held at ground potential by their corresponding amplifiers 108. ~ultiplexer 116 connects column el~ctrode C2 to comparator 122 via amplifier 120. Since the input to the amplifier 120 is a virtual ground and all the row electrodes except except the selected electrode ~2 are held at or close to ground potential, no current can flow into the input to amplifier 120 from the non-selected row electrodes.
Current only flows into the input of the amplifier 120 from the selected row slectrode, which is held at a positive voltage by multiplexer 112. The magnitude of this current is determined by the resistance 140 between the row~
and column electrodes at the intersection currently addressed by multiplexers 112 and 116. This resistance, and hence the current into the amplifier, is determined by whether or not contact is made at the currently selected intersection. If no contact is made, the resistance is high, little current flows into the amplifier, and ths amplifier output voltage remains at or close to zero. If contact is made, the interelectrode resistance switches to the low state, current flows into the amplifier input, and the output of the amplifier goes low. Thus, the operation of multiplexer 112, counter 114, and amplifiers 108 serve to isolate all but the selected selected intersection resi~tance from being measured as each column is sPlected by column multiplexer 11~.
The procedure carried out by the computer 170 in reading the entire array will be described with reference to the flow diagram shown in Fig. 7 and the circuitry of Fig. 6. The procedure illustrated is shown in more detail in the source listing in Table 1. This listing is a program written in C and 8086 assembly language for use with an IBM PC with the sensor and measurement circuitry ~Z~3~7 described above. It should be appreciated that this procedure is exemplary. Other algorithms may be used in making measurements in accordance with the present invention.
To begin a measurement, the computer initializes the counters which keep track of the position for the measured data, block 702. In a real time display, the computer will zero or initialize counters repsenting the rows and columns of the display corresponding to the rows and columns of the sensor. If the data is to be stored, the computer will initialize registers designating the memory area where the data is to be stored.
Nex~, the computer sends signals to the measurement circuit of Fig. 6 which reset the row and column counters and begin the measurement process, block 704. This reset$
row counter 114 and cloumn counter 118 to their initial values, which are zero in the described embodiment. After this, the measurement process begins.
The processor sends a ~,ignal to the measurement circuitry which causes the circuitry to measure the resistance of the first eight points of the sensor array, block 706~ The data is transferred to the computer in 8-bit bytes. While the measurement circuitry is measuring eight array points, the computer waits for a signal from the interface circuit indicating that the measurement is complete, block 708. During this period the measurement circuitry of Fig. 6 performs the following operations.
At tne beginning of the measurment of the electrode array, row and column counters are set to zero.
Multiplexer 116 applies the signal on the first column electrode Cl to tha threshold detector 122, and multiplexer 112 applies a high signal to the first row electrode ~1 The high or low voltage from multiplexer 116 indicates the resistance at the selected array point, and threshold detector 122 converts this to a digital value which is clocked into a register 130.
lZl~S~7 Register 130 is an 8-bit, addressable register. The 3 LSB's from the row counter are applied to the address inputs of register 130. Register 130 and row counter 114 are clocked by a signal from the interface circuit on line 136. The first clock pulse following the beginning of the measurement clocks the output from threshold detector 122 into the first bit of register 130 and also increments row counter 114.
The above procedure is repeated for each of the first eight array locations in the first column, with the value in row counter 114 being incremented after each point is measured to provide the proper row address to multiplexer 112 and the proper register address to 8-bit register 130.
A busy signal corresponding to the 4th bit of the row counter is applied to the interface circuit 160 on line 13 and indicates when 8 array points have been measured and register 130 is ready to be read.
When the busy ;signal goes high, the computer goes to block 710 where the first eight bits of data are read into the computer. The computer either stores the data for later processing and display, block 712, or sends the data to a display such as a CRT screen for immediate viewing, block 71~. The clock signal to the row counter and register 130 is disabled while the computer is reading the data. The computer then increments its internal row register, block 716, and checks to see whether all the columns in the rwo have been read, block 718. If not, the computer returns to block 706 where the above process is repeated, except that the MSB's o~ the row counter cuase multiplexer 112 to select the next eight rows of the array during the next processing of eight bits.
If all the data from a row has been read, the computer prepares to read the data from the next column by reseting its row register to 0 and incrementing the column register, block 720. The computer checks to see whether all columns have been read, block 722. If not, the computer returns to ~;~6~i47 block 706, and the first eight bits of the next column are read~ This procedure is repeated until data from all the points in the sensor array havs been read into the computer.
If all columns have been read, and the computer is taking only one measurement of the patient's occlusion, the computer stops, block 724 r until a request for another reading starts the above process again at block 702.
Alternatively, the computer can take several occlusion measurements to show, for example, the change in occlusion as the patient's jaw closes. In this case, the computer increments a frame counter, block 726, which keeps track of which measurement is currently being taken. The computer then checks to see whether all the measurements to be take~
are complete by comparing the frame counter with a maximum frame number, block 728. If the measurements are complete, the computer stops, block 730. Otherwise, the computer returns to block 702 where another measurement process is begun.
With the circuit shown in Fig. 6, the sensor and measurement circuitry are able to determine the resistance of an array point every 10 microseconds. With the 48 by 48 electrode array having 2304 array points, the fastest possible sampling speed is about ~3 Hz. Using an IBM PC
with the procedure and circuitry described, the actual sampling rate is about 33 Hz, or one complete measurement every 0.03 seconds. This rate is sufficiently fast to give excellent resolution in dynamically measuring a patient's occlusion to diagnose bite and dental problems.
There has been described a new and useful method, sensor, and circuitry for detecting contact points, and in particular for performing measuraments of dental occlusion.
It should be appreciated that the sensor described herein, while particularly suited to dental occlusion measurements, may be used in other situations where measurement of points of contact is desired, especially whre the measurement ~Z635~7 sensor must be extremly thin to avoid disturbance of the contact area belng measured, and that this embodiment may be modified by those of ordinary skill in the art in applying the teachings of the invention in different applications and circumstances. Therefore~ the invention should not be limited by the disclosure of particular circuitry or procedures herein, but rather the invention should only be interpreted in accordance with the following claims.
~%~;~5~'7 Table l /***~**********~********:~******~***~*****~**************~**~*********~5*
~odule~ FASTMONO._ Functions~
main - displays Sontek sen~or on mono screen when linked with DISPMONO and thæ di 5p lay utility library C:~8ENSOR~DISPUTIL.LIB
get_framo - C version of gettiny frame from Sentek D~ntal sænsor ****************************~***********~****************************~
4includæ "stdio.h"
~incl~de "dos.h"
4definæ DATAPOPT Ox310 ~define CNTLPO~T Ox311 ~dæfine INIT Ox40 ~defino GO Ox80 ~dæfine ON 1 ~dQfin~ OFF 15 int cncolor, cffcolor,topx,topy3 maint) extern int dispfast~)~curpost~ ~Is(), setmodet~setctlc~>;
int count,row,col,tb, i,j~
int pos , videoaddC1152~ *pv~
char new_fra~æC2~8~, *pc;
setmodetO); /* O for mono */
clsc);
count - O;
oncolor - ON;
oSfcolor = OFF~
printft"ON color~?~n");
scanf~"Xd",~oncolor);
printf("OFF color?~n");
~canft"%d",&offcolor3 cls(~;
forScol=O~col<48;col++)t for~rowDO~row<6lrow++)t forttb~O~tb<4~tb++)t pos = ~20 + col*2 + trow*4+tb)*1~0;
videoaddCCoUnt~ D pOSi~
di~ptpos+l, offcolor*l6~orlcolor);
-- . ~
~Z~3~
(Table 1, contin~ed) , , f otr C i =O; i < ~2; i ~ p ~ *i ~ 1, 79 ) curpos (O, 4~);
printf C"SENTEK Dental S~nsor\n");
~ount - 1~
f~kval ~1 a pv ~ ~v 1 d ~?o~dd C O ~;
pc ~ &n~w_fr~m~lO~
~or ~ {
curpos(4, 0) print f C"Frame X5d\n", (count~+~ )~
1 f ~count > 2SO) {count~O~ b~*p get_frame Cpc ) di~apfast ~pc,pv) ~
if (kbhitC) '~ O) my~xit~);
g~t_frameCpc >
ch~r *pc ~
~xt ~r n i nt 1e;et mode C ) 3 int i~
outp(CNTLPORT,INIT);
outpCCNTLPORT, I~IT~;
outp~CNTLPORT,O);
outpCCNTLPORT,O)~
forCi~O~i~28~;i+i){
outp~GNTLPORT,~0)3 outp(CNTLPORT,~O)~
outp (ONTLPORT, 0~;
out p ( CNTLPORT, O
wh i l e ( C i np C CNTLPORT ~ O
bdos t Oxb ~;
}
*(pcl+) c (char~ inpCDATAPORT);
/* i f C (inpCCNTLPORT) 8~& OxO~ O
1iietmodeCO~;
print~C"Not done ~rror.\n"~3 ~etmodetO) r ~tur n ( ~ ) ;
~, r~turn C0) *~
~Z~j3S4~
(Table 1, continued) DISPMO~O.ASM
~ D15PFAST diçplay~ the current s~nsor fram~. It i~ called ; from C as disptast~pc,pv~ where pc is a pointer to thæ
~ charactær array loaded from the SenteK 5ensor, and pv is ; a pointer to the array ot vid~c, ~ftsets to be C compatible all routinec arQ NEAR and conform to the c convæntion of passing argument~ ~nd flow of control.
See the ~icro~oft C Compiler docum~ntation for detail~
;
dgroup group data d~ta segmænt word public 'data' assumæ ds:dgroup zero dw Oh one dw Ih chartab db 32 db 223 db ~
db `~19 data ænds pgroup group prog prog segment byte public 'prog' aS5UmQ C 5: pgroup public di~pfast ;
video_bas~ equ ObOOOh dispfast proc near push bp ~ save bp push bx mov bp, 5p mov ax,6Cbpl ~ get pointer to data mov bx,8Cbp3 ; pointer to video addre~n push cx push dx push es push di push si mov di, ax ~ mov pDinter to data to bp mov cx,vidæo_base mov es,cx ~LZ~3S~7 5Table }, continued) mov dx,2~8 nextbyt:
mov al, dgrc ~Cdi~ ~ ax has data byt~ I
xor ah,ah mov ch,4 nextprl mov bp,dgroupeCbx~ i bp ha~ video address mov ~i,ax and si,03 mov cl,chartabCsi~
mov e~Cbp~,cl ~hr ~x,l ~hr ax,l inc bx irlC bx dec ch jnz nextpr inc di dec dx jnz nextbyt pop 5-pop di pop es pop dx pop c x pop bx pop bp r~t dispfa~t ~ndp prog end 5 end
Background Art -It is frequently desirable or necessary in performing dental diagnostic procedures to measure the occlusion, or points of contact, between a patient's teeth as the patient closes his or her jaws. Occlusion measurements are necessary in prescribing and fitting many dental appliance~
such as false teeth or orthodontic devices. Such measurements enable the user to determine where the teeth first contact each other, disclosing high spots and other useful information.
In order to provide an accurate measurement of the occlusion, an occlusal measuring device must be extremely thin so as not to perturb the normal dental alignment. A
sensor must also have a very high resolution to provide useful information and distinguish between contact and non-contact points of the teeth. Additionally, a practical sensor must be safe for oral use and should be capable of being used by non-technical personel with minimal training.
To date, the types of occ~usal sensors available to dentists for measuring occlusion have been limited. The most common method of measuring dental occlusion is by means of a piece of carbon-paper like materal upon which a patient bites down. The points of contact are indicated by the deposit of a marking substance on the dental surfaces.
This method is rapid to use and inexpensive, but provides limited information. The resolution i5 not very great, ~ "~
~tj35~7 especially where complex dental interactions are involved, and there is no easy method to retain a permanent record in a patient's files for later comparison.
Another occlusal sensor uses a thin piece of plastic which is bitten to proYide an imprint of the occlusion. The occlusion is read by illuminating the plastic with polarized light which indicates the points of contact b~
different colors. Disadvantages of this method include a relatively thick sensor, a high degree of training necessary to interpret the results, and a relatively complex procedure to create the imprint pattern.
Other methods exist for performing occlusal analysis, including x-rays and casts of a patient's bite, but these methods are expensive, time consuming, and in general are not suitable for large scale use in dental offices. A
simple and inexpensive method of providing Gcclusal measurements which have a high resolution and which are capable of being permanently retained would be of great value to dentists and others concerned with occlusal measurements.
~isclosure o~ the Invention The present invention includes a unique contact sensor for detecting points on a grid where the sensor is being contacted on opposing sides by teeth surfaces. The sensor is extremely thin, on the order of a few thousands of an inch thick, and can provida high resolution capa~le of distinguishing between contact points seperated by Q.050 inches or less.
Brie~ly, the contact sensor includes two sets of parallel electrodes which are each formed on a thin, ~lexible supporting sheet. The electrodes are then coated with a thin, resistive coating. Two such electrode structures are oriented at approximatly right angles to create a grid where the intersecting electrodes cross. The ~f~3~7 electrodes are then formed into a sheet with the electorde3 beinq seperatsd by a novel intermediate layer.
In the absence of an external force, the intermediate layer provides a high resistance between intersecting electrodes. The novel composition of the intermediate layer results in a structure which provides a "switching"
ef~ect such that the resistance between electrodes is very high where therP is no e~ternal pressure and changes to a comparativel~ low value at locations where external pressure is applied by two contacting points or surfaces.
The sensor output is dynamic in the sense that the resistance will change back and forth between high and low resistance state~ as external pressure is repeatedly applied and removed. Thus, repeated measurements of contacting points may be made by a single sensor.
Although the contact sensor has many possible applications, it is ideally suited for measuring dental occlusion. The extreme thinness of the sensor allows occlusion to be measured with little or no alteration of a patient's normal bite, and the high resolution provides detailed information to a dentist or other user about the interaction of denta~ surfaces. The binary switching action of the inter-electrode resistance allows simple circuitry to reliably detect contacting and non-contacting points of a patient's teeth as the sensor is bitten and contact is made between the teeth. The sensor may be fabricated very inexpensively. This allows a sensor to be discarded after use by one patient, thus eliminating the necessity of sterilization between patients.
~dditionally, the sensor output may be provided by means of a small computer or similar digital processor which monitors the signals from the sensor grid and which provides an ouput which indicates the variation in dental occlusion with time. Since multiple contacts may be measured at each electrode intersection, the changing patterns of dantal occlusion as a patients bites down on ~Z~3~
the sensor can be monitored to provide a total representation of the patient's occlusion as the jaw is closed. This information is extremely valuable in diagnosing and treating certain dental problems. The ability to take such measurements quickly and to keep a permanent record of the occlusion is valuable in providing later follow up care.
Brief Description of Drawinqs The invention may be more fully understood by reading the following description of the preferred embodiment in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, of which:
Fig. 1 shows the overall construction of the sensor of the invention;
Fig. 2 shows a magnified view of the relationship of the electrodes to the backing and resistive coating;
Fig. 3 is a microscopic view of the interface between resistive coatings on facing electrode arrays;
Fig. 4 shows one method by which a dental occlusal sensor may be fabricated as a single piece;
Fig. 5 shows an exemplary structure for oral use of an occlusal sensor;
Fig. 6 shows circuitry for measuring the resistance of electrode array points in a sengor;
Fig. 7 shows one procedure by which a co~puter may control the circuitry of Fig. 6; and FigsO 8A and 8B are useful in estimating the through and inter-electrode resistances of a sensor array for different electrode spacings.
Best Mode for Carrying Out the Invention Referring to Fig. 1, the basic structure of the contact sensor used in the present invention is shown. A top layer 50 is fabricated as discussed in detail below. Top layer 50 includes a flexible backing 52 on which are formed parallel rows of electrodes 54. Each electrode is ~3~i~7 connected to a respective terminal 56 through which electrical contact to the electrode is made. A bottom layer 60 is similarly constructed and includes multiple electrodes 64 fromed on a backing 6~ and respectively connected to terminals 66. A seperation layer 70 is normally included between the top and bottom layers 60 and 70.
Referring to Fig. 2, the construction of the top and bottom layers is shown in more detail. The backing 52 provides a flexible support for electrodes 54. In the preferred embodiment described herein, backing 52 is formed of a polyester film such as Mylar. Other similar films such as Kapton, manufactured by DuPont, may be used for the~
backing. These materials combine thinness and strength in a material which can be made into a sterile, waterproof package suitable for oral use. Other materials may be used for the backing.
In the preferred embodiment, electrodes 54 are formed via know methods for making flexible printed circuits. A
thin copper layer is attached to the backing 52 with an adhesive 58. The electrode pattern is applied to the copper layer with photo-resist, and the unwanted copper is then etched away. Other methods may be used to fabricate the electrodes including directly printing the electrodes on the backing using a conducting ink.
Next, the electrodes are coated with a resistive coating 72. Coating 72 may be formed of a resistive ink.
Resistive inks are materials which can be printed or otherwise applied in thin coatings and which serve to limit the current flowing thsrethrough. The technology of formulating and applying resistive inks is well developed.
See, for example, Screen Printing Electronic Circuits, by Albert Kasoloff, 1980, and National Bureau of Standards Circular No. 530, U.S. Government Printing Office.
In the preferred embodiment, a resistive coating is used which includes graphite in an acetone or keytone ~%63~
solvent. The resistive coating should be applied in as thin a layer as possible. The preferred thickness is in the range of 1/2 to 2 mils thicko In the preferred embodiment described below, the resistive coating is formed by combining an insulating inX having a titanium dioxide filler, vinyl resin binder, and butyl cellosolve acetate solvent with a conductive ink containing graphite, vinyl resin, and butyl cellosolve acetate. Such inks are commercially available from many sources, e.g., Electrodag lo 423SS conductive ink and SS 24210 insulating ink, produced by Acheson Colloids Company, Port Huron, Michigan. The resistance of the coating can be varied by changing the relative proportions of the insulating and conductive components of the coating. In the preferred embodiment, 15 the coating is composed of the above-described formulation having twenty percent conductive and eighty percent insulative inks by ~Jeight. The coating is applied through a 200 mesh polyester screen and room dried. The ¢oating is preferra~ly one-half mil thick with a resistivity of 60 to 100 kilohms per square.
To form the sensor, two layers as shown in Fig. 2 are placed together with the electrodes at angles to each other, as shown in Fig. 1, in a sandwich arrangement with the resistive coatings 72 facing one another and optionally seperated with a seperation layer 70, as discussed below.
It has been discovered that a sensor constructed in accordance with the procedure set forth above has the characteristic that the resistance between electodes as a function o~ applied pressure is non-linear. Application of an external force has minimal effect on the resistance between opposing electrodes at the pressure point until a threshold point is reached, at which point the resistance between the opposing electrodes abruptly decreases. For the sensor and resistive coating formulation described above, the resistance changes from a value on the order of several megohms to a value on the order of one kilohm. As 5~
a result of this phenomenon, the described sensor may be used to detect contacting points using relatively simple circuitry while maintaining a very high signal to noise ratio in the output.
When two electrode layers such as that shown in Fig. 2 are combined in a sensor with the resistive coatings 72 in direct contact, it has been found that the threshold force required to switch from the high resistance state to the low resistance state is variable, resulting in possible spurious readings. A seperation layer 70, as shown in Fig.
1, may be added to the sensor to improve its performance.
The primary requirements of the seperation layer are that it be non-conductive, flexible, and as thin as possible.
Various materials may be used as the seperation layer.
Materials which have been used and found suitable include nylon mesh, non-conducting paints including polymer-based paints such as Acheson Electrodag SS24210 or latex paint, and talcum powder.
Of these materi.als, talcum powder has provided the best results. In use, a thin layer of talcum powder is applied to both of the resistive coatings. The excess talcum powder is removed with a low velocity s~ream of air, such as by blowing off the powder, the powder remaining providing the seperation layer.
Nylon mesh has also prove to be useful as a seperation layer. Nylon mesh reults in a higher threshold force to switch the interelectxode resistance from high t~ low resistance states, however using such a mesh tends to decrease the ability of the sensor to accurately detect continuous lines or surfaces of contact.
While the reason for the switching effect described above has not been precisely determined, the following is believed to be the explanation. The resistive coating, when applied, has a gritty surface. When two alectrode layers are combined with the resistive coakings facing one another, the structure is believed to have the ~Z~ii4~
configuration shown in Fig. 3. In Fig. 3, the two resistive layers 58 contact each other along an interface 80. Due to the grittiness of the surface, the contacting area is very small with only isolated high points of the opposing coatings 58 actually touching. When pressure is applied, the coating elastically deforms creating a larger area of ~ontact and a lower resistance. It is believed that the threshold effect is at least partially due to the need to overcome the starting frictional forces which resist any sliding action between the two coatings until a threshold level is exceeded. It is further believed that the seperation layers serve to provide a more constant interface between the two layers, thus providing for a more even threshold force level.
The above described sensor also works when only the resistive coating is applied to only one of the electrode arrays, although the sensor sensitivity is more variable than with the construction using two coatings. A
seperation layer may optionally be used on top of the resistive coating, and such a seperation layer reduces the variability of the threshold force, similarly to the two coating sensor. Using two coatings is preferred, however.
The ~ensor of the pre.sent invention is capable of very hi~h resolution. Sensors ~ave been built in accordance with the above procedure which have electrode spacings of 0.050 inches. The principal factor limiting resolution is the capability of available methods to form thin electrode grids. ~he smallest electrode spacing which can now be reliably achieved using conventional printed circuit or conductive ink deposition methods is approximately 0.010 inches. Finer resolution would appear to be achievable.
Referring to Fig. 8~, the inter trace resistance Ri ~
the resistive coating 72 between electrodes is represented by resistor 82. The through resistance Rt from each electrode to the surface is represented by resistor 84.
The seperation between electrodes is W.
i35~7 g The resistance through a specific configuration is inversely proportional to the cross-sectional area and proportional to the length through which the current flows~
The through resistance Rt depends upon the total surface area through which a current flows. The pattern of this current flow is illustrated in Fig. 8B by dotted current lines 86 from electrode 54 to the surface of the resistive coating 72. The nature of this flow makes ~he through resistance difficult to calculate analytically. From experimental measurements, however, it is known that this resistance is on the order of a few thousand ohms.
The inter-electrode resistance Ri is easier to calculate since the length of the resistive path is long compared to the cross-sectional area resulting in a generally linear current flow. Thus, the inter-electrode resistance may be expressed as Ri = Kc x A
where Kc i~ a proportionality constant, A is the cross-sectional area of the resistive coating between ~5 traces, and W is the electrode seperation. For an electrode spacing of 0.050 inches and using the electrode and sensor structure described above, Ri is about five megohms. From the above equation, the interel~ctrode resistance is proportional to W. Reducing W by a factor of ten to 0.005 inches will result in a value for Rt on the order o~ 500 kilohms. Thus, the inter-electrode resistance will still be much larger that the through resistance for electrode spacings of 0.005 inches, which is finer than can be achieved with conventional processes.
A practical sensor for use in dental applications should preferrably be disposable to eliminate the need for , ~2~S47 sterilization between patients. Fig. 4 shows the configuration ~or an electrode layer in which the top and bottom electrode arra~s are simultaneously formed on a single backing sheet. In Fig. 4, a backing sheet 52 has column electrodes 66 formed on one half thereof and row electrodes 54 formed on the other half. The row electrodes have an area 88 where the teeth make contact with each other from opposite sides of the sensor. Conductive paths 96 are in the area between the contacting surfaces of the teeth and serve to connect row electrodes 88. The row and column electrodes extend to either end of the sheet 52 where a connector is attached at the regions denoted by dottet lines 87 to provide electrical contact to tha electrodes. The electrodes 90 connect row ele~trodes 54 to the connector region 87.
After the electrodes are formed, the structure shown in Fig. 4 has a resistive coating and optional seperation layer applied thereto, as described above. The backing sheet 52 is then fo:Lded at line 89 so that the row and column electrodes face one another, and the structure thus formed is held together by applying an adhesive or tape to the edge portions 91 of the folded sensor. To make a dental occlusal sensor, the sensor shown in Fig. 4 may be fabricated into a configuration suitable for oral use, such as that shown in Fig. 5. In Fig. 5., the sensor 60 is shown with the electrode area 88 cross-hatched to indicate where a patient would bite down on the sensor. The signals from the sensor are applied to the measurment electronics via a multiconductor cable 94 which is attached to the sensor via a connector 92. Signals from the electrodes in area 88 are applied to the connector 92 via conductors within the supporting sheet 90, as described above with reference to Fig. 4. Connector 92 may make contact directly to the electrode traces 87 on the sensor 60 without the necessity for having a matching connector piece - attached to the sensor. in this manner, an inexpensive -- ~Lzf(j3~L7 oral sensor may be easily fabricated, allowing for the use of disposable sensors. This greatly increases the ease of use, since sterilization between patients is not required, and also reduces the posibility of tranmission of germs due 5 to incomplete sterilization of sensors between uses.
Referring to Fig. 6, a circuit is shown for reading the sensor output in conjuction with a personal computer.
It should be appreciated that a dedicated digital controller or other type of processor could e~ually well be used in place of the computer, and the use of such alternate processors may be preferrable in some applications. In the preferred embodiment, computer 170 is an IBM Personal Computer which is interfaced to the circuitry shown through an interface circuit 160. The design o~ interface 160 will be readily apparent to one of ordinary skill in the art. An example of such an interfaca circuit which will work with the IBM PC is shown and described in the I_ PC Technical Reference Manual, Vol. 2, at pages "prototype card 9."
In Fig. 6, a sensor 102 includes of a plurality of column electrodes 100, designated as Cl through Cnl and a plurality of row electrodes 98, designated as Rl through Rn. In the preferred embodiment, the sensor includes 48 rows and 48 columns. At each intersection of a row and column is a resistor 104 and switch 106. Resistors 104 have a resistance on the order one kilohm. The plurality of resistors 104 represent the low resistance between opposing electrodes when contact is detected. The closing of switches 106 represents the switching from a high to low resistive state of the interelectrode resistance by the closing of the corresponding switch 106. Each intersection has a measureable resistance of several megohms, not represented in Fig. ~, in the absence of contact at that intersection.
Each row electrode is driven by the output of an asocicated amplifier 108, shown in Fig. 6 as unity gain ~2~3~i4~
buffer amplifiers. The input to each amplifier 108 is connected to ground through a resistor 110 and also to an output from multiplexer 112. The common terminal terminal of multiplexer 112 is connected to a positive voltage fV.
Normally, the inputs to amplifiers 103 are held at ground porential by resistors 110. As described below, in response to digital inputs from row counter 114, multiplexer 112 sequentially connects the inputs to each row-driver amplifier 108 to the +V potential, causing the 0 corresponding row electrode to also go to a high potential.
Row counter 114 is incremented by a clock signal from interface circuit 160, as described in more de~ail below.
Each of the column electrodes is connected to an individua~ input to a 48-to-1 multiplexer 116. Column counter 118 is incremented by a carry signal from row counter 114 after a~l the points along each row have been measured. In response to inputs from a column counter 118, multiplexer 116 sequentially connects aach column electrode to the input to an amplifier circuit 120.
Amplifier 120 includes an op-amp 123 and feedback resistor 121. The non-inverting input of op-amp 120 is grounded, and feedback resistor 121 is connected from the op-amp output to the inverting input. Thus, the inverting input to the op-amp is a virtual ground, and the voltage at the output of the op-amp is a function of the current flowing into the inverting input. Amplifier 120 is connected as an inverting amplifier.
The output signal from amplifier 120 is applied to a threshold detector 122, including a comparator 124 and a potentiometer 126. Comparator 122 provides a digital signal to a register 130, depending on whether the output voltage from amplifier 120 is above or below the threshold level selected by potentiometer 126, as discussed below.
The measurement circuit operates in the following manner. Assume that the circuitry has selected column C2 and row R2, which will measure the resistance of the 3 ZS~5~3L'7 electrode intersection represented by resistor 140 and switch 142. Counter 114 and multiplexer 112 apply a high voltage to row electrode R2 via the corresponding amplifier 108. All other row electrodes are held at ground potential by their corresponding amplifiers 108. ~ultiplexer 116 connects column el~ctrode C2 to comparator 122 via amplifier 120. Since the input to the amplifier 120 is a virtual ground and all the row electrodes except except the selected electrode ~2 are held at or close to ground potential, no current can flow into the input to amplifier 120 from the non-selected row electrodes.
Current only flows into the input of the amplifier 120 from the selected row slectrode, which is held at a positive voltage by multiplexer 112. The magnitude of this current is determined by the resistance 140 between the row~
and column electrodes at the intersection currently addressed by multiplexers 112 and 116. This resistance, and hence the current into the amplifier, is determined by whether or not contact is made at the currently selected intersection. If no contact is made, the resistance is high, little current flows into the amplifier, and ths amplifier output voltage remains at or close to zero. If contact is made, the interelectrode resistance switches to the low state, current flows into the amplifier input, and the output of the amplifier goes low. Thus, the operation of multiplexer 112, counter 114, and amplifiers 108 serve to isolate all but the selected selected intersection resi~tance from being measured as each column is sPlected by column multiplexer 11~.
The procedure carried out by the computer 170 in reading the entire array will be described with reference to the flow diagram shown in Fig. 7 and the circuitry of Fig. 6. The procedure illustrated is shown in more detail in the source listing in Table 1. This listing is a program written in C and 8086 assembly language for use with an IBM PC with the sensor and measurement circuitry ~Z~3~7 described above. It should be appreciated that this procedure is exemplary. Other algorithms may be used in making measurements in accordance with the present invention.
To begin a measurement, the computer initializes the counters which keep track of the position for the measured data, block 702. In a real time display, the computer will zero or initialize counters repsenting the rows and columns of the display corresponding to the rows and columns of the sensor. If the data is to be stored, the computer will initialize registers designating the memory area where the data is to be stored.
Nex~, the computer sends signals to the measurement circuit of Fig. 6 which reset the row and column counters and begin the measurement process, block 704. This reset$
row counter 114 and cloumn counter 118 to their initial values, which are zero in the described embodiment. After this, the measurement process begins.
The processor sends a ~,ignal to the measurement circuitry which causes the circuitry to measure the resistance of the first eight points of the sensor array, block 706~ The data is transferred to the computer in 8-bit bytes. While the measurement circuitry is measuring eight array points, the computer waits for a signal from the interface circuit indicating that the measurement is complete, block 708. During this period the measurement circuitry of Fig. 6 performs the following operations.
At tne beginning of the measurment of the electrode array, row and column counters are set to zero.
Multiplexer 116 applies the signal on the first column electrode Cl to tha threshold detector 122, and multiplexer 112 applies a high signal to the first row electrode ~1 The high or low voltage from multiplexer 116 indicates the resistance at the selected array point, and threshold detector 122 converts this to a digital value which is clocked into a register 130.
lZl~S~7 Register 130 is an 8-bit, addressable register. The 3 LSB's from the row counter are applied to the address inputs of register 130. Register 130 and row counter 114 are clocked by a signal from the interface circuit on line 136. The first clock pulse following the beginning of the measurement clocks the output from threshold detector 122 into the first bit of register 130 and also increments row counter 114.
The above procedure is repeated for each of the first eight array locations in the first column, with the value in row counter 114 being incremented after each point is measured to provide the proper row address to multiplexer 112 and the proper register address to 8-bit register 130.
A busy signal corresponding to the 4th bit of the row counter is applied to the interface circuit 160 on line 13 and indicates when 8 array points have been measured and register 130 is ready to be read.
When the busy ;signal goes high, the computer goes to block 710 where the first eight bits of data are read into the computer. The computer either stores the data for later processing and display, block 712, or sends the data to a display such as a CRT screen for immediate viewing, block 71~. The clock signal to the row counter and register 130 is disabled while the computer is reading the data. The computer then increments its internal row register, block 716, and checks to see whether all the columns in the rwo have been read, block 718. If not, the computer returns to block 706 where the above process is repeated, except that the MSB's o~ the row counter cuase multiplexer 112 to select the next eight rows of the array during the next processing of eight bits.
If all the data from a row has been read, the computer prepares to read the data from the next column by reseting its row register to 0 and incrementing the column register, block 720. The computer checks to see whether all columns have been read, block 722. If not, the computer returns to ~;~6~i47 block 706, and the first eight bits of the next column are read~ This procedure is repeated until data from all the points in the sensor array havs been read into the computer.
If all columns have been read, and the computer is taking only one measurement of the patient's occlusion, the computer stops, block 724 r until a request for another reading starts the above process again at block 702.
Alternatively, the computer can take several occlusion measurements to show, for example, the change in occlusion as the patient's jaw closes. In this case, the computer increments a frame counter, block 726, which keeps track of which measurement is currently being taken. The computer then checks to see whether all the measurements to be take~
are complete by comparing the frame counter with a maximum frame number, block 728. If the measurements are complete, the computer stops, block 730. Otherwise, the computer returns to block 702 where another measurement process is begun.
With the circuit shown in Fig. 6, the sensor and measurement circuitry are able to determine the resistance of an array point every 10 microseconds. With the 48 by 48 electrode array having 2304 array points, the fastest possible sampling speed is about ~3 Hz. Using an IBM PC
with the procedure and circuitry described, the actual sampling rate is about 33 Hz, or one complete measurement every 0.03 seconds. This rate is sufficiently fast to give excellent resolution in dynamically measuring a patient's occlusion to diagnose bite and dental problems.
There has been described a new and useful method, sensor, and circuitry for detecting contact points, and in particular for performing measuraments of dental occlusion.
It should be appreciated that the sensor described herein, while particularly suited to dental occlusion measurements, may be used in other situations where measurement of points of contact is desired, especially whre the measurement ~Z635~7 sensor must be extremly thin to avoid disturbance of the contact area belng measured, and that this embodiment may be modified by those of ordinary skill in the art in applying the teachings of the invention in different applications and circumstances. Therefore~ the invention should not be limited by the disclosure of particular circuitry or procedures herein, but rather the invention should only be interpreted in accordance with the following claims.
~%~;~5~'7 Table l /***~**********~********:~******~***~*****~**************~**~*********~5*
~odule~ FASTMONO._ Functions~
main - displays Sontek sen~or on mono screen when linked with DISPMONO and thæ di 5p lay utility library C:~8ENSOR~DISPUTIL.LIB
get_framo - C version of gettiny frame from Sentek D~ntal sænsor ****************************~***********~****************************~
4includæ "stdio.h"
~incl~de "dos.h"
4definæ DATAPOPT Ox310 ~define CNTLPO~T Ox311 ~dæfine INIT Ox40 ~defino GO Ox80 ~dæfine ON 1 ~dQfin~ OFF 15 int cncolor, cffcolor,topx,topy3 maint) extern int dispfast~)~curpost~ ~Is(), setmodet~setctlc~>;
int count,row,col,tb, i,j~
int pos , videoaddC1152~ *pv~
char new_fra~æC2~8~, *pc;
setmodetO); /* O for mono */
clsc);
count - O;
oncolor - ON;
oSfcolor = OFF~
printft"ON color~?~n");
scanf~"Xd",~oncolor);
printf("OFF color?~n");
~canft"%d",&offcolor3 cls(~;
forScol=O~col<48;col++)t for~rowDO~row<6lrow++)t forttb~O~tb<4~tb++)t pos = ~20 + col*2 + trow*4+tb)*1~0;
videoaddCCoUnt~ D pOSi~
di~ptpos+l, offcolor*l6~orlcolor);
-- . ~
~Z~3~
(Table 1, contin~ed) , , f otr C i =O; i < ~2; i ~ p ~ *i ~ 1, 79 ) curpos (O, 4~);
printf C"SENTEK Dental S~nsor\n");
~ount - 1~
f~kval ~1 a pv ~ ~v 1 d ~?o~dd C O ~;
pc ~ &n~w_fr~m~lO~
~or ~ {
curpos(4, 0) print f C"Frame X5d\n", (count~+~ )~
1 f ~count > 2SO) {count~O~ b~*p get_frame Cpc ) di~apfast ~pc,pv) ~
if (kbhitC) '~ O) my~xit~);
g~t_frameCpc >
ch~r *pc ~
~xt ~r n i nt 1e;et mode C ) 3 int i~
outp(CNTLPORT,INIT);
outpCCNTLPORT, I~IT~;
outp~CNTLPORT,O);
outpCCNTLPORT,O)~
forCi~O~i~28~;i+i){
outp~GNTLPORT,~0)3 outp(CNTLPORT,~O)~
outp (ONTLPORT, 0~;
out p ( CNTLPORT, O
wh i l e ( C i np C CNTLPORT ~ O
bdos t Oxb ~;
}
*(pcl+) c (char~ inpCDATAPORT);
/* i f C (inpCCNTLPORT) 8~& OxO~ O
1iietmodeCO~;
print~C"Not done ~rror.\n"~3 ~etmodetO) r ~tur n ( ~ ) ;
~, r~turn C0) *~
~Z~j3S4~
(Table 1, continued) DISPMO~O.ASM
~ D15PFAST diçplay~ the current s~nsor fram~. It i~ called ; from C as disptast~pc,pv~ where pc is a pointer to thæ
~ charactær array loaded from the SenteK 5ensor, and pv is ; a pointer to the array ot vid~c, ~ftsets to be C compatible all routinec arQ NEAR and conform to the c convæntion of passing argument~ ~nd flow of control.
See the ~icro~oft C Compiler docum~ntation for detail~
;
dgroup group data d~ta segmænt word public 'data' assumæ ds:dgroup zero dw Oh one dw Ih chartab db 32 db 223 db ~
db `~19 data ænds pgroup group prog prog segment byte public 'prog' aS5UmQ C 5: pgroup public di~pfast ;
video_bas~ equ ObOOOh dispfast proc near push bp ~ save bp push bx mov bp, 5p mov ax,6Cbpl ~ get pointer to data mov bx,8Cbp3 ; pointer to video addre~n push cx push dx push es push di push si mov di, ax ~ mov pDinter to data to bp mov cx,vidæo_base mov es,cx ~LZ~3S~7 5Table }, continued) mov dx,2~8 nextbyt:
mov al, dgrc ~Cdi~ ~ ax has data byt~ I
xor ah,ah mov ch,4 nextprl mov bp,dgroupeCbx~ i bp ha~ video address mov ~i,ax and si,03 mov cl,chartabCsi~
mov e~Cbp~,cl ~hr ~x,l ~hr ax,l inc bx irlC bx dec ch jnz nextpr inc di dec dx jnz nextbyt pop 5-pop di pop es pop dx pop c x pop bx pop bp r~t dispfa~t ~ndp prog end 5 end
Claims (23)
1. Apparatus for measuring a person's dental occlusion, comprising:
a sensor, including:
a plurality of generally parallel electrodes supported by a flexible backing sheet to provide a set of row electrodes;
a second plurality of generally parallel electrodes supported by a flexible backing sheet to provide a set of column electrodes;
a resistive layer between the row and column electrode sets;
means for positioning the row and column electrodes so that the two electrodes sets face one another seperated by the resistive layerand oriented so that the electrodes of one set cross the electrodes of the other set at an angle to create a plurality of intersections where row electrodes cross over column electrodes;
said means for positioning being such as to allow insertion of the sensor into the person's mouth so that the facing electrode sets are between the person's upper and lower teeth; and terminal means for applying signals to each of the electrodes; and means for sensing the resistance between the respective row and column electrodes at each intersection and for providing an output in response thereto representative of the contacting points of the patient's bite.
a sensor, including:
a plurality of generally parallel electrodes supported by a flexible backing sheet to provide a set of row electrodes;
a second plurality of generally parallel electrodes supported by a flexible backing sheet to provide a set of column electrodes;
a resistive layer between the row and column electrode sets;
means for positioning the row and column electrodes so that the two electrodes sets face one another seperated by the resistive layerand oriented so that the electrodes of one set cross the electrodes of the other set at an angle to create a plurality of intersections where row electrodes cross over column electrodes;
said means for positioning being such as to allow insertion of the sensor into the person's mouth so that the facing electrode sets are between the person's upper and lower teeth; and terminal means for applying signals to each of the electrodes; and means for sensing the resistance between the respective row and column electrodes at each intersection and for providing an output in response thereto representative of the contacting points of the patient's bite.
2. The apparatus of claim 1 wherein the resistive layer includes a resistive coating deposited over each of the row and column electode sets.
3. The apparatus of claim 2 wherein the sensor includes a seperation layer between the resistive coatings over the first and second electrode sets.
4. The aparatus of claim 3 wherein the resistive layer includes a resistive paint having titanium dioxide and graphite as components thereof.
5. The apparatus of claim 4 wherein the thickness of each of the resistive coatings is 2 mils or less.
6. The apparatus of claim 5 wherein the resistivity of the resistive paint is in the range of 40 to 100 kilohms per square for a 1 mil thickness.
7. The apparatus of claim 2 wherein the means for sensing includes:
means for detecting whether the resistance between the first and second electrodes at each intersection is above or below a preselected threshold level.
means for detecting whether the resistance between the first and second electrodes at each intersection is above or below a preselected threshold level.
8. The apparatus of claim 2 wherein the means for sensing includes:
means for sequentially selecting individual electrodes from among the row electrodes and for applying a first potential to all row electrodes except the selected electrode;
means for applying a second potential to the selected electrode; and means for measuring the resistance between each of the column electrodes and the selected row electrode during the time that each row electrode is selected.
means for sequentially selecting individual electrodes from among the row electrodes and for applying a first potential to all row electrodes except the selected electrode;
means for applying a second potential to the selected electrode; and means for measuring the resistance between each of the column electrodes and the selected row electrode during the time that each row electrode is selected.
9. The apparatus of claim 8 wherein the means for measuring includes means for comparing the voltage on a selected column electrode to a threshold voltage and for providing an output signal representative of whether the voltage on the selected electrode is above or below the threshold.
10. A method of measuring a person's dental occlusion, including the steps of:
providing a sensor having, a plurality of generally parallel electrodes supported by a flexible backing sheet to provide a set of row electrodes;
providing a second plurality of generally parallel electrodes oriented at an angle to the row electrodes and supported by a flexible backing sheet to provide a set of column electrodes;
arranging the row and column electrodes with the two electrodes sets facing one another, seperated by a resistive layer, and oriented so that the electrodes of one set cross the electrodes of the other set at an angle to create a plurality of intersections where row electrodes cross over column electrodes;
positioning the sensor in the person's mouth between the person's upper and lower teeth; and having the person bite down on the sensor;
sensing the resistance between the respective row and column electrodes at each intersection and providing an output in response thereto representative of the contacting points of the patient's bite.
providing a sensor having, a plurality of generally parallel electrodes supported by a flexible backing sheet to provide a set of row electrodes;
providing a second plurality of generally parallel electrodes oriented at an angle to the row electrodes and supported by a flexible backing sheet to provide a set of column electrodes;
arranging the row and column electrodes with the two electrodes sets facing one another, seperated by a resistive layer, and oriented so that the electrodes of one set cross the electrodes of the other set at an angle to create a plurality of intersections where row electrodes cross over column electrodes;
positioning the sensor in the person's mouth between the person's upper and lower teeth; and having the person bite down on the sensor;
sensing the resistance between the respective row and column electrodes at each intersection and providing an output in response thereto representative of the contacting points of the patient's bite.
11. The method of claim 10 wherein the step of arranging includes the step of applying a resistive coating over each of the sets of row and column electrodes.
12. The method of claim 11 wherein the step of sensing includes the step of detecting whether the resistance between the first and second electrodes at each intersection is above or below a preselected threshold level.
13. The method of claim 11 wherein the step of sensing includes the steps of:
sequentially selecting individual electrodes from among the row electrodes and applying a first potential to all row electrodes except the selected electrode;
applying a second potential to the selected electrode; and measuring the resistance between each of the column electrodes and the selected row electrode during the time that each row electrode is selected.
sequentially selecting individual electrodes from among the row electrodes and applying a first potential to all row electrodes except the selected electrode;
applying a second potential to the selected electrode; and measuring the resistance between each of the column electrodes and the selected row electrode during the time that each row electrode is selected.
14. The method of claim 13 wherein the step of measuring includes the step of comparing the voltage on a selected column electrode to a threshold voltage and providing an output signal representative of whether the voltage on the selected electrode is above or below the threshold.
15. A contact sensor for sensing points of contact between two opposing objects, comprising:
a plurality of generally parallel electrodes supported by a flexible backing sheet to provide a set of row electrodes;
a second plurality of generally parallel electrodes supported by a flexible backing sheet to provide a set of column electrodes:
a resistive layer between the row and column electrode sets;
means for positioning the row and column electrodes so that the two electrodes sets face one another seperated by the resistive layer and oriented so that the electrodes of one set cross the electrodes of the other set at an angle to create a plurality of intersections where row electrodes cross over column electrodes, and so that the row and column electrodes so positioned can be inserted between the two opposing objects so that contact between the two objects is made through the backing sheets forcing the row and column electrodes closer to one another at said intersections through the resistive coating;
terminal means for applying signals to each of the electrodes; and means for sensing the resistance between the respective row and column electrodes at each intersection and for providing an output in response thereto representative of the contacting points between the opposing objects.
a plurality of generally parallel electrodes supported by a flexible backing sheet to provide a set of row electrodes;
a second plurality of generally parallel electrodes supported by a flexible backing sheet to provide a set of column electrodes:
a resistive layer between the row and column electrode sets;
means for positioning the row and column electrodes so that the two electrodes sets face one another seperated by the resistive layer and oriented so that the electrodes of one set cross the electrodes of the other set at an angle to create a plurality of intersections where row electrodes cross over column electrodes, and so that the row and column electrodes so positioned can be inserted between the two opposing objects so that contact between the two objects is made through the backing sheets forcing the row and column electrodes closer to one another at said intersections through the resistive coating;
terminal means for applying signals to each of the electrodes; and means for sensing the resistance between the respective row and column electrodes at each intersection and for providing an output in response thereto representative of the contacting points between the opposing objects.
16. The apparatus of claim 15 wherein the resistive layer includes a resistive coating applied over each of the row and column electrode sets.
17. The apparatus of claim 16 wherein the sensor includes a seperation layer between the resistive coatings over the first and second electrode sets.
18. The aparatus of claim 16 wherein the resistive coatings include a resistive paint having titanium dioxide and graphite as components thereof.
19. The apparatus of claim 18 wherein the thickness of the resistive coatings is 2 mils or less.
20. The apparatus of claim 18 wherein the resistivity of the resistive paint is in the range of 40 to 100 kilohms per square for a 1 mil thickness.
21. The apparatus of claim 16 wherein the means for sensing includes:
means for detecting whether the resistance between the first and second electrodes at each intersection is above or below a preselected threshold level.
means for detecting whether the resistance between the first and second electrodes at each intersection is above or below a preselected threshold level.
22. The apparatus of claim 16 wherein the means for sensing includes:
means for sequentially selecting individual electrodes from among the row electrodes and for applying a first potential to all row electrodes except the selected electrode;
means for applying a second potential to the selected electrode; and means for measuring the resistance between each of the column electrodes and the selected row electrode during the time that each row electrode is selected.
means for sequentially selecting individual electrodes from among the row electrodes and for applying a first potential to all row electrodes except the selected electrode;
means for applying a second potential to the selected electrode; and means for measuring the resistance between each of the column electrodes and the selected row electrode during the time that each row electrode is selected.
23. The apparatus of claim 22 wherein the means for measuring includes means for comparing the voltage on a selected column electrode to a threshold voltage and for providing an output signal representative of whether the voltage on the selected electrode is above or below the threshold.
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| US717,532 | 1985-03-29 | ||
| US06/717,532 US4734034A (en) | 1985-03-29 | 1985-03-29 | Contact sensor for measuring dental occlusion |
Publications (1)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| CA1263547A true CA1263547A (en) | 1989-12-05 |
Family
ID=24882402
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| CA000505274A Expired CA1263547A (en) | 1985-03-29 | 1986-03-27 | Contact sensor for measuring dental occlusion |
Country Status (9)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| US (1) | US4734034A (en) |
| EP (1) | EP0216899B1 (en) |
| JP (1) | JPH0720478B2 (en) |
| KR (1) | KR940000860B1 (en) |
| AT (1) | ATE72391T1 (en) |
| AU (1) | AU585007B2 (en) |
| CA (1) | CA1263547A (en) |
| DE (1) | DE3683818D1 (en) |
| WO (1) | WO1986005678A1 (en) |
Families Citing this family (150)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US4856993A (en) * | 1985-03-29 | 1989-08-15 | Tekscan, Inc. | Pressure and contact sensor system for measuring dental occlusion |
| GB8619800D0 (en) * | 1986-08-14 | 1986-09-24 | Microelectronics Applic Resear | Tactile sensor device |
| US4995404A (en) * | 1988-08-25 | 1991-02-26 | Nemir David C | Apparatus for treating bruxism |
| US5121334A (en) * | 1989-06-08 | 1992-06-09 | Regents Of The University Of Minnesota | Method and apparatus for automated machining of objects of complex and unique geometry |
| US5027281A (en) * | 1989-06-09 | 1991-06-25 | Regents Of The University Of Minnesota | Method and apparatus for scanning and recording of coordinates describing three dimensional objects of complex and unique geometry |
| US5128870A (en) * | 1989-06-09 | 1992-07-07 | Regents Of The University Of Minnesota | Automated high-precision fabrication of objects of complex and unique geometry |
| US5257203A (en) * | 1989-06-09 | 1993-10-26 | Regents Of The University Of Minnesota | Method and apparatus for manipulating computer-based representations of objects of complex and unique geometry |
| US5184306A (en) * | 1989-06-09 | 1993-02-02 | Regents Of The University Of Minnesota | Automated high-precision fabrication of objects of complex and unique geometry |
| ES2043387T3 (en) * | 1989-09-22 | 1993-12-16 | Peter Rohleder | PROCESS AND APPARATUS FOR THE PRODUCTION OF AN INDIVIDUAL DENTAL SPARE. |
| US6040821A (en) * | 1989-09-26 | 2000-03-21 | Incontrol Solutions, Inc. | Cursor tracking |
| US5231386A (en) * | 1990-07-24 | 1993-07-27 | Home Row, Inc. | Keyswitch-integrated pointing assembly |
| US5033291A (en) * | 1989-12-11 | 1991-07-23 | Tekscan, Inc. | Flexible tactile sensor for measuring foot pressure distributions and for gaskets |
| US5060527A (en) * | 1990-02-14 | 1991-10-29 | Burgess Lester E | Tactile sensing transducer |
| US5257184A (en) * | 1990-04-10 | 1993-10-26 | Mushabac David R | Method and apparatus with multiple data input stylii for collecting curvilinear contour data |
| DE4015109A1 (en) * | 1990-05-11 | 1991-11-14 | Lechler Elring Dichtungswerke | CYLINDER HEAD GASKET |
| JPH0797057B2 (en) * | 1990-07-06 | 1995-10-18 | 株式会社エニックス | Surface pressure distribution detection element |
| US5541622A (en) * | 1990-07-24 | 1996-07-30 | Incontrol Solutions, Inc. | Miniature isometric joystick |
| DE4024665A1 (en) * | 1990-08-03 | 1992-02-13 | Wolfgang Becker | DEVICE FOR CARRYING OUT THE INSTRUMENTAL AND CLINICAL FUNCTIONAL ANALYSIS FOR THE CREATION OF A DENTAL PROSTHESIS |
| US5159159A (en) * | 1990-12-07 | 1992-10-27 | Asher David J | Touch sensor and controller |
| US5131259A (en) * | 1991-02-01 | 1992-07-21 | Fel-Pro Incorporated | Calibration fixture and method of calibrating contact sensors |
| US5086652A (en) * | 1991-02-25 | 1992-02-11 | Fel-Pro Incorporated | Multiple pad contact sensor and method for measuring contact forces at a plurality of separate locations |
| US5218861A (en) * | 1991-03-27 | 1993-06-15 | The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company | Pneumatic tire having an integrated circuit transponder and pressure transducer |
| CN1034390C (en) * | 1991-05-23 | 1997-04-02 | 中国人民解放军第四军医大学口腔医院 | Microcomputerized dynamic tester |
| US5121929A (en) * | 1991-06-24 | 1992-06-16 | Fel-Pro Incorporated | Gasket with encased load sensor |
| US5289827A (en) * | 1992-03-17 | 1994-03-01 | Orkin Frederic L | Uterine contraction sensing method |
| US5510783A (en) * | 1992-07-13 | 1996-04-23 | Interlink Electronics, Inc. | Adaptive keypad |
| US5581019A (en) * | 1992-07-16 | 1996-12-03 | W. L. Gore & Associates, Inc. | Gasket/insertable member and method for making and using same |
| DE4226012C2 (en) * | 1992-08-06 | 1994-12-08 | Goetze Ag | Cylinder head gasket |
| US5431064A (en) * | 1992-09-18 | 1995-07-11 | Home Row, Inc. | Transducer array |
| DE69316306T2 (en) * | 1992-10-15 | 1998-04-23 | Fuji Photo Film Co Ltd | System for analyzing the occlusal condition |
| US5323650A (en) * | 1993-01-14 | 1994-06-28 | Fullen Systems, Inc. | System for continuously measuring forces applied to the foot |
| US5915285A (en) * | 1993-01-21 | 1999-06-22 | Optical Coating Laboratory, Inc. | Transparent strain sensitive devices and method |
| US5381799A (en) * | 1994-01-14 | 1995-01-17 | The Procter & Gamble Company | Inexpensive and easy to use mechanically operated bite force gauge |
| US5678448A (en) * | 1994-01-14 | 1997-10-21 | Fullen Systems, Inc. | System for continuously measuring forces applied by the foot |
| DE4401325C1 (en) * | 1994-01-18 | 1995-06-08 | Reinhold Ott | Monitoring sensor |
| US5488871A (en) * | 1994-02-16 | 1996-02-06 | The Timken Company | Bearing adjustment using compressive force sensor |
| US6087930A (en) * | 1994-02-22 | 2000-07-11 | Computer Methods Corporation | Active integrated circuit transponder and sensor apparatus for transmitting vehicle tire parameter data |
| US5731754A (en) * | 1994-06-03 | 1998-03-24 | Computer Methods Corporation | Transponder and sensor apparatus for sensing and transmitting vehicle tire parameter data |
| US5483827A (en) * | 1994-06-03 | 1996-01-16 | Computer Methods Corporation | Active integrated circuit transponder and sensor apparatus for sensing and transmitting vehicle tire parameter data |
| US5541570A (en) * | 1994-12-09 | 1996-07-30 | Force Imaging Technologies, Inc. | Force sensing ink, method of making same and improved force sensor |
| AUPN007594A0 (en) * | 1994-12-16 | 1995-01-19 | Commonwealth Scientific And Industrial Research Organisation | Anaesthesia measurement |
| US6029358A (en) * | 1995-09-11 | 2000-02-29 | Dwayne L. Mason | Solid state digital electronic shoe sizer |
| US5989700A (en) * | 1996-01-05 | 1999-11-23 | Tekscan Incorporated | Pressure sensitive ink means, and methods of use |
| DE19642247C1 (en) * | 1996-10-12 | 1998-01-15 | Sebastian Meller | Prosthesis production system for prepared tooth |
| US5952585A (en) * | 1997-06-09 | 1999-09-14 | Cir Systems, Inc. | Portable pressure sensing apparatus for measuring dynamic gait analysis and method of manufacture |
| GB9722766D0 (en) | 1997-10-28 | 1997-12-24 | British Telecomm | Portable computers |
| LU90233B1 (en) * | 1998-04-08 | 1999-10-11 | Iee Sarl | Device for querying several sensor elements in a matrix connection |
| GB2343516A (en) * | 1998-11-03 | 2000-05-10 | Univ Brunel | Fabric pressure sensor comprising conductive layers or strips and an insulating separator |
| US6542717B1 (en) * | 1999-01-20 | 2003-04-01 | International Business Machines Corporation | System and method for optimizing personal area network (PAN) electrostatic communication |
| GB9911081D0 (en) * | 1999-05-12 | 1999-07-14 | Univ Brunel | Switch |
| US8821158B1 (en) * | 1999-10-14 | 2014-09-02 | Geodigm Corporation | Method and apparatus for matching digital three-dimensional dental models with digital three-dimensional cranio-facial CAT scan records |
| US6804571B2 (en) | 2000-03-13 | 2004-10-12 | Fullen Systems, Llc | Method for computer aided orthotic inlay fabrication |
| AU770743B2 (en) | 2000-04-03 | 2004-03-04 | Intelligent Textiles Limited | Conductive pressure sensitive textile |
| US7161476B2 (en) | 2000-07-26 | 2007-01-09 | Bridgestone Firestone North American Tire, Llc | Electronic tire management system |
| US8266465B2 (en) | 2000-07-26 | 2012-09-11 | Bridgestone Americas Tire Operation, LLC | System for conserving battery life in a battery operated device |
| US7345671B2 (en) | 2001-10-22 | 2008-03-18 | Apple Inc. | Method and apparatus for use of rotational user inputs |
| US7312785B2 (en) | 2001-10-22 | 2007-12-25 | Apple Inc. | Method and apparatus for accelerated scrolling |
| US20070085841A1 (en) * | 2001-10-22 | 2007-04-19 | Apple Computer, Inc. | Method and apparatus for accelerated scrolling |
| US7046230B2 (en) * | 2001-10-22 | 2006-05-16 | Apple Computer, Inc. | Touch pad handheld device |
| NL1019607C2 (en) | 2001-12-19 | 2003-06-20 | Dutch Space B V | Sensor mat for registering a pressure profile. |
| US7333092B2 (en) * | 2002-02-25 | 2008-02-19 | Apple Computer, Inc. | Touch pad for handheld device |
| JP2005532138A (en) | 2002-07-11 | 2005-10-27 | アンダンテ・メデイカル・デバイス・リミテツド | Force sensor system for use in weight support monitoring |
| US7186270B2 (en) * | 2002-10-15 | 2007-03-06 | Jeffrey Elkins 2002 Corporate Trust | Foot-operated controller |
| CA2525530A1 (en) * | 2003-05-14 | 2004-11-25 | Tekscan, Inc. | High temperature pressure sensitive device and method thereof |
| US20060181517A1 (en) * | 2005-02-11 | 2006-08-17 | Apple Computer, Inc. | Display actuator |
| US20070152977A1 (en) * | 2005-12-30 | 2007-07-05 | Apple Computer, Inc. | Illuminated touchpad |
| US7499040B2 (en) * | 2003-08-18 | 2009-03-03 | Apple Inc. | Movable touch pad with added functionality |
| US7584016B2 (en) * | 2003-09-30 | 2009-09-01 | Intrinsic Marks International Llc | Item monitoring system and methods |
| US7495659B2 (en) * | 2003-11-25 | 2009-02-24 | Apple Inc. | Touch pad for handheld device |
| US8059099B2 (en) * | 2006-06-02 | 2011-11-15 | Apple Inc. | Techniques for interactive input to portable electronic devices |
| US6964205B2 (en) * | 2003-12-30 | 2005-11-15 | Tekscan Incorporated | Sensor with plurality of sensor elements arranged with respect to a substrate |
| US7118375B2 (en) * | 2004-01-08 | 2006-10-10 | Duane Milford Durbin | Method and system for dental model occlusal determination using a replicate bite registration impression |
| GB0404419D0 (en) | 2004-02-27 | 2004-03-31 | Intelligent Textiles Ltd | Electrical components and circuits constructed as textiles |
| US6993954B1 (en) * | 2004-07-27 | 2006-02-07 | Tekscan, Incorporated | Sensor equilibration and calibration system and method |
| US7771371B2 (en) * | 2004-08-11 | 2010-08-10 | Andante Medical Devices Ltd | Sports shoe with sensing and control |
| CN100555200C (en) * | 2004-08-16 | 2009-10-28 | 苹果公司 | The method of the spatial resolution of touch sensitive devices and raising touch sensitive devices |
| US20060141416A1 (en) * | 2004-12-24 | 2006-06-29 | Knutson Eric J | Occlusal indicator tray & processes therefor |
| US7849751B2 (en) * | 2005-02-15 | 2010-12-14 | Clemson University Research Foundation | Contact sensors and methods for making same |
| DE102005011066A1 (en) * | 2005-03-08 | 2006-09-14 | Sirona Dental Systems Gmbh | Method for establishing the positional match of 3D data sets in a dental CAD / CAM system |
| US7671837B2 (en) * | 2005-09-06 | 2010-03-02 | Apple Inc. | Scrolling input arrangements using capacitive sensors on a flexible membrane |
| US7880729B2 (en) * | 2005-10-11 | 2011-02-01 | Apple Inc. | Center button isolation ring |
| US20070152983A1 (en) | 2005-12-30 | 2007-07-05 | Apple Computer, Inc. | Touch pad with symbols based on mode |
| US9910425B2 (en) | 2006-04-21 | 2018-03-06 | Donald Spector | Method for creating custom orthopedic supports from computerized data inputs |
| US10466667B2 (en) | 2006-04-21 | 2019-11-05 | Donald Spector | Method for creating custom orthopedic supports from computerized data inputs |
| US11259951B2 (en) | 2006-04-21 | 2022-03-01 | Donald Spector | Method for creating custom orthopedic supports from computerized data inputs |
| US8583272B2 (en) * | 2006-04-21 | 2013-11-12 | Donald Spector | Orthopods and equipment to generate orthopedic supports from computerized data inputs |
| US8022935B2 (en) | 2006-07-06 | 2011-09-20 | Apple Inc. | Capacitance sensing electrode with integrated I/O mechanism |
| US9360967B2 (en) * | 2006-07-06 | 2016-06-07 | Apple Inc. | Mutual capacitance touch sensing device |
| US8743060B2 (en) | 2006-07-06 | 2014-06-03 | Apple Inc. | Mutual capacitance touch sensing device |
| US20080006454A1 (en) * | 2006-07-10 | 2008-01-10 | Apple Computer, Inc. | Mutual capacitance touch sensing device |
| TW200808273A (en) * | 2006-08-03 | 2008-02-16 | Univ Kaohsiung Medical | Dual-end test stick and occlusion test device with the dual-end test stick |
| US7795553B2 (en) | 2006-09-11 | 2010-09-14 | Apple Inc. | Hybrid button |
| US20080088597A1 (en) * | 2006-10-11 | 2008-04-17 | Apple Inc. | Sensor configurations in a user input device |
| US8274479B2 (en) * | 2006-10-11 | 2012-09-25 | Apple Inc. | Gimballed scroll wheel |
| US20080088600A1 (en) * | 2006-10-11 | 2008-04-17 | Apple Inc. | Method and apparatus for implementing multiple push buttons in a user input device |
| US8482530B2 (en) * | 2006-11-13 | 2013-07-09 | Apple Inc. | Method of capacitively sensing finger position |
| US7509884B2 (en) * | 2007-02-01 | 2009-03-31 | Nitta Corporation | Sensor sheet |
| US9654104B2 (en) | 2007-07-17 | 2017-05-16 | Apple Inc. | Resistive force sensor with capacitive discrimination |
| WO2009032898A2 (en) * | 2007-09-04 | 2009-03-12 | Apple Inc. | Compact input device |
| US8683378B2 (en) | 2007-09-04 | 2014-03-25 | Apple Inc. | Scrolling techniques for user interfaces |
| US20090058801A1 (en) * | 2007-09-04 | 2009-03-05 | Apple Inc. | Fluid motion user interface control |
| US20090073130A1 (en) * | 2007-09-17 | 2009-03-19 | Apple Inc. | Device having cover with integrally formed sensor |
| US8416198B2 (en) | 2007-12-03 | 2013-04-09 | Apple Inc. | Multi-dimensional scroll wheel |
| US8125461B2 (en) * | 2008-01-11 | 2012-02-28 | Apple Inc. | Dynamic input graphic display |
| US8820133B2 (en) * | 2008-02-01 | 2014-09-02 | Apple Inc. | Co-extruded materials and methods |
| US9454256B2 (en) | 2008-03-14 | 2016-09-27 | Apple Inc. | Sensor configurations of an input device that are switchable based on mode |
| TWI397850B (en) * | 2008-05-14 | 2013-06-01 | Ind Tech Res Inst | Sensing apparatus and scanning actuation method thereof |
| US20100058251A1 (en) * | 2008-08-27 | 2010-03-04 | Apple Inc. | Omnidirectional gesture detection |
| US8816967B2 (en) | 2008-09-25 | 2014-08-26 | Apple Inc. | Capacitive sensor having electrodes arranged on the substrate and the flex circuit |
| US8395590B2 (en) * | 2008-12-17 | 2013-03-12 | Apple Inc. | Integrated contact switch and touch sensor elements |
| US8212575B2 (en) * | 2008-12-29 | 2012-07-03 | Lexmark International, Inc. | Device for analyzing size and location of conductive item |
| US8820173B2 (en) | 2009-03-06 | 2014-09-02 | Andrew C. Clark | Contact sensors and methods for making same |
| US9354751B2 (en) * | 2009-05-15 | 2016-05-31 | Apple Inc. | Input device with optimized capacitive sensing |
| US9095275B2 (en) * | 2009-06-03 | 2015-08-04 | Andrew C. Clark | Contact sensors and methods for making same |
| US8872771B2 (en) * | 2009-07-07 | 2014-10-28 | Apple Inc. | Touch sensing device having conductive nodes |
| US20120092279A1 (en) | 2010-10-18 | 2012-04-19 | Qualcomm Mems Technologies, Inc. | Touch sensor with force-actuated switched capacitor |
| US9278856B2 (en) | 2011-04-08 | 2016-03-08 | Covestro Llc | Flexible sensing material containing carbon nanotubes |
| US20130233063A1 (en) * | 2012-03-08 | 2013-09-12 | Fancheng Wang | Sensor for Determining Contact |
| US9076419B2 (en) | 2012-03-14 | 2015-07-07 | Bebop Sensors, Inc. | Multi-touch pad controller |
| US9024910B2 (en) | 2012-04-23 | 2015-05-05 | Qualcomm Mems Technologies, Inc. | Touchscreen with bridged force-sensitive resistors |
| ES2485616B1 (en) * | 2013-02-12 | 2015-06-02 | David VERDE SÁNCHEZ | Pressure sensor device |
| US9545296B2 (en) | 2013-08-05 | 2017-01-17 | Stephen R Hansen | Digital face bow system and method |
| FR3013959B1 (en) * | 2013-12-03 | 2016-01-08 | Odaxos | SYSTEM FOR DETERMINING THE CONTACT SURFACE AND THE DISTRIBUTION OF OCCLUSAL FORCES BETWEEN THE TEETH OF A PATIENT JAW AND METHOD THEREFOR. |
| FR3014186A1 (en) | 2013-12-03 | 2015-06-05 | Odaxos | SYSTEM FOR DETERMINING THE SHAPE AT LEAST PARTIAL OF A THREE - DIMENSIONAL OBJECT AND CORRESPONDING METHOD. |
| WO2015111633A1 (en) | 2014-01-21 | 2015-07-30 | 合同会社Ｍｏｔｔ | Occlusion measurement device and method for detecting occlusal force |
| CN104000667A (en) * | 2014-04-04 | 2014-08-27 | 首都医科大学附属北京口腔医院 | Stress testing apparatus and lingual orthodontic force measuring apparatus |
| US10362989B2 (en) * | 2014-06-09 | 2019-07-30 | Bebop Sensors, Inc. | Sensor system integrated with a glove |
| US10092255B2 (en) | 2014-08-08 | 2018-10-09 | Rayence Co., Ltd. | Intraoral sensor |
| KR102325337B1 (en) | 2014-08-08 | 2021-11-12 | 주식회사 레이언스 | Intraoral sensor |
| KR102336211B1 (en) | 2014-08-08 | 2021-12-09 | 주식회사 레이언스 | Intraoral sensor apparatus |
| KR102301941B1 (en) | 2014-08-08 | 2021-09-16 | 주식회사 레이언스 | Image sensor and intraoral sensor device using the same |
| US9667884B2 (en) | 2014-09-05 | 2017-05-30 | Lsi Solutions, Inc. | System and method for evaluating surgical knot formation |
| WO2016102689A1 (en) | 2014-12-23 | 2016-06-30 | Haydale Graphene Industries Plc | Piezoresistive device |
| EP3350585A4 (en) | 2015-09-15 | 2019-07-17 | Sencorables LLC | Floor contact sensor system and methods for using same |
| EP3341511B1 (en) | 2015-12-18 | 2019-08-21 | Intelligent Textiles Limited | Conductive fabric, method of manufacturing a conductive fabric and apparatus therefor |
| US10925704B2 (en) * | 2016-02-02 | 2021-02-23 | Microcopy, Ltd. | Interproximal articulation holder |
| US10473539B2 (en) | 2016-06-30 | 2019-11-12 | Tekscan, Inc. | Stretchable force sensor having undulating patterned electrodes |
| US10772536B2 (en) | 2016-08-14 | 2020-09-15 | Michael L. Mathiasmeier | Capacitance measuring and imaging sensor system |
| US10357329B2 (en) * | 2016-12-30 | 2019-07-23 | Cochlear Limited | Bone bed drilling template |
| DE102017100791B4 (en) * | 2017-01-17 | 2018-09-06 | Pilz Gmbh & Co. Kg | Multi-layer, tactile sensor with fastening means |
| TWI641819B (en) * | 2017-09-07 | 2018-11-21 | 宏碁股份有限公司 | Pressure sensor and pressure sensing method |
| US11596540B2 (en) * | 2017-12-22 | 2023-03-07 | Aesyra Sa | Devices and method for bruxism management |
| EP3536277B1 (en) | 2018-03-09 | 2021-05-19 | Universidad del Pais Vasco - Euskal Herriko Unibertsitatea (UPV/EHU) | Method and system of dental occlusion measurement and virtual deployment |
| EP3536278A1 (en) | 2018-03-09 | 2019-09-11 | Universidad del Pais Vasco - Euskal Herriko Unibertsitatea (UPV/EHU) | Method and system of occlusion forces measurement and alignment |
| WO2019193216A1 (en) | 2018-04-05 | 2019-10-10 | Tech Xika Ptt, S.L. | Device for measuring dental parameters |
| US10653204B2 (en) * | 2018-05-29 | 2020-05-19 | Matmarket, LLC | High performance footbed and method of manufacturing same |
| AT521046B1 (en) * | 2018-06-05 | 2019-10-15 | Atomic Austria Gmbh | Sports shoe, in particular ski boot for the practice of skiing |
| US10884496B2 (en) | 2018-07-05 | 2021-01-05 | Bebop Sensors, Inc. | One-size-fits-all data glove |
| WO2020045499A1 (en) * | 2018-08-28 | 2020-03-05 | ミネベアミツミ株式会社 | Battery pack |
| US11480481B2 (en) | 2019-03-13 | 2022-10-25 | Bebop Sensors, Inc. | Alignment mechanisms sensor systems employing piezoresistive materials |
Family Cites Families (16)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US2951817A (en) * | 1959-07-28 | 1960-09-06 | Thomas E Myers | Variable resistance material |
| US3349489A (en) * | 1963-02-07 | 1967-10-31 | Shackelford John Hinton | Multiple celled pressure sensitive dental device for measuring relative occlusal pressures |
| US3503031A (en) * | 1969-02-11 | 1970-03-24 | Control Data Corp | Printed circuit keyboard |
| US4155262A (en) * | 1977-05-02 | 1979-05-22 | General Electric Company | Metal oxide varistor pressure sensor and method |
| DE2737163A1 (en) * | 1977-08-18 | 1979-02-22 | Fichtel & Sachs Ag | METHOD AND DEVICE FOR IDENTIFICATION AND / OR POSITION DETECTION OF WORKPIECES |
| NL187594C (en) * | 1979-04-02 | 1991-11-18 | Nippon Telegraph & Telephone | DEVICE FOR DETECTING X AND Y COORDINATES. |
| US4314228A (en) * | 1980-04-16 | 1982-02-02 | Eventoff Franklin Neal | Pressure transducer |
| US4301337A (en) * | 1980-03-31 | 1981-11-17 | Eventoff Franklin Neal | Dual lateral switch device |
| JPS5848175B2 (en) * | 1980-05-02 | 1983-10-27 | 株式会社 モリタ製作所 | Full jaw occlusal pressure image display device |
| JPS584817A (en) * | 1981-06-29 | 1983-01-12 | Teijin Ltd | Multicolor dyed polyester thick and thin yarn and its preparation |
| JPS59118040U (en) * | 1983-01-31 | 1984-08-09 | アルプス電気株式会社 | input device |
| US4451714A (en) * | 1983-02-09 | 1984-05-29 | Eventoff Franklin Neal | Spacerless keyboard switch circuit assembly |
| US4492949A (en) * | 1983-03-18 | 1985-01-08 | Barry Wright Corporation | Tactile sensors for robotic gripper and the like |
| US4521186A (en) * | 1983-05-17 | 1985-06-04 | Harold Wodlinger | System for determining the first prematurity contact of dental occlusion |
| US4488873A (en) * | 1983-06-14 | 1984-12-18 | Pennwalt Corporation | Piezoelectric polymeric film occlusal force indicator |
| US4555953A (en) * | 1984-04-16 | 1985-12-03 | Paolo Dario | Composite, multifunctional tactile sensor |
-
1985
- 1985-03-29 US US06/717,532 patent/US4734034A/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
-
1986
- 1986-03-27 CA CA000505274A patent/CA1263547A/en not_active Expired
- 1986-03-28 WO PCT/US1986/000624 patent/WO1986005678A1/en active IP Right Grant
- 1986-03-28 KR KR1019860700841A patent/KR940000860B1/en not_active IP Right Cessation
- 1986-03-28 JP JP61501995A patent/JPH0720478B2/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
- 1986-03-28 EP EP86902610A patent/EP0216899B1/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 1986-03-28 AT AT86902610T patent/ATE72391T1/en not_active IP Right Cessation
- 1986-03-28 AU AU56650/86A patent/AU585007B2/en not_active Ceased
- 1986-03-28 DE DE8686902610T patent/DE3683818D1/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
Also Published As
| Publication number | Publication date |
|---|---|
| DE3683818D1 (en) | 1992-03-19 |
| AU5665086A (en) | 1986-10-23 |
| JPH0720478B2 (en) | 1995-03-08 |
| KR870700329A (en) | 1987-12-28 |
| KR940000860B1 (en) | 1994-02-03 |
| WO1986005678A1 (en) | 1986-10-09 |
| US4734034A (en) | 1988-03-29 |
| EP0216899A1 (en) | 1987-04-08 |
| AU585007B2 (en) | 1989-06-08 |
| JPS62502665A (en) | 1987-10-15 |
| ATE72391T1 (en) | 1992-02-15 |
| EP0216899B1 (en) | 1992-02-05 |
| EP0216899A4 (en) | 1988-06-08 |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| CA1263547A (en) | Contact sensor for measuring dental occlusion | |
| US4856993A (en) | Pressure and contact sensor system for measuring dental occlusion | |
| JP3713595B2 (en) | Tongue pressure measurement system | |
| Brown et al. | The Sheffield data collection system | |
| Wu | Scanning approaches of 2-D resistive sensor arrays: A review | |
| Lazzarini et al. | A tactile array sensor layered in an artificial skin | |
| JPH05509163A (en) | Reusable test unit for simulating electrochemical sensor signals for quality verification of portable blood analysis instruments | |
| Lyons et al. | An evaluation of the T-Scan computerised occlusal analysis system. | |
| US10485642B2 (en) | Occlusion measurement device and method for detecting occlusal force | |
| CN202020563U (en) | Tooth pressure detecting instrument | |
| JP2015136620A (en) | Occlusal force detection device and occlusal force detection method | |
| Kattavenos et al. | Force‐sensitive tactile sensor for minimal access surgery | |
| Girão et al. | Tactile sensors and their use in industrial, robotic and medical applications | |
| McCutcheon et al. | Microprocessor controlled instrument for tongue-palate contact measurement during speech | |
| Stojanović et al. | Comparison of Performances of Flexible Tailor-Made Force Sensing Resistors Fabricated Using Inkjet and Xurographic Techniques | |
| StojanoviT et al. | Research Article Comparison of Performances of Flexible Tailor-Made Force Sensing Resistors Fabricated Using Inkjet and Xurographic Techniques | |
| RU2045782C1 (en) | Graphics information reader | |
| JPH0440333A (en) | Measuring instrument for operating power distribution of finger and palm | |
| Crisan et al. | Hand Movements Monitoring Device for Post Paresis Recovery Process | |
| Gery et al. | A tactile sensing system for dexterous manipulation | |
| Barnett et al. | Microcomputer analysis and display of canine small intestinal electrical activity | |
| Pribadi et al. | EIT 2D dengan Daerah Rujukan (EIT with Material Reference) | |
| Telage | Automated instrumentation for research on the lingual tactile sensory system | |
| SU1284506A2 (en) | Apparatus for investigating appreciation of pain | |
| Mylavarapu | Data acquisition using Labview to measure the force transfers in the flexors of a human hand |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| MKEX | Expiry |