CA1272265A - Method for directly detecting corrosion on conductive containers - Google Patents
Method for directly detecting corrosion on conductive containersInfo
- Publication number
- CA1272265A CA1272265A CA000584161A CA584161A CA1272265A CA 1272265 A CA1272265 A CA 1272265A CA 000584161 A CA000584161 A CA 000584161A CA 584161 A CA584161 A CA 584161A CA 1272265 A CA1272265 A CA 1272265A
- Authority
- CA
- Canada
- Prior art keywords
- corrosion
- antenna means
- container means
- decay
- container
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Expired - Fee Related
Links
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01N—INVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
- G01N17/00—Investigating resistance of materials to the weather, to corrosion, or to light
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01B—MEASURING LENGTH, THICKNESS OR SIMILAR LINEAR DIMENSIONS; MEASURING ANGLES; MEASURING AREAS; MEASURING IRREGULARITIES OF SURFACES OR CONTOURS
- G01B7/00—Measuring arrangements characterised by the use of electric or magnetic techniques
- G01B7/02—Measuring arrangements characterised by the use of electric or magnetic techniques for measuring length, width or thickness
- G01B7/06—Measuring arrangements characterised by the use of electric or magnetic techniques for measuring length, width or thickness for measuring thickness
- G01B7/10—Measuring arrangements characterised by the use of electric or magnetic techniques for measuring length, width or thickness for measuring thickness using magnetic means, e.g. by measuring change of reluctance
Abstract
METHOD FOR DIRECTLY DETECTING CORROSION
ON CONDUCTIVE CONTAINERS
ABSTRACT
There is disclosed a method for directly detecting corrosion on the walls of conductive containers wherein a transmitting antenna induces a current into a portion of the container wall and the decay of the induced current is detected by a receiving antenna, with a record of the decay of the induced current being created. The record is inter-preted to determine the presence or absence of a corrosion component, with the corrosion component being caused by the presence of corrosion products having superparamagnetic properties.
ON CONDUCTIVE CONTAINERS
ABSTRACT
There is disclosed a method for directly detecting corrosion on the walls of conductive containers wherein a transmitting antenna induces a current into a portion of the container wall and the decay of the induced current is detected by a receiving antenna, with a record of the decay of the induced current being created. The record is inter-preted to determine the presence or absence of a corrosion component, with the corrosion component being caused by the presence of corrosion products having superparamagnetic properties.
Description
~ 6 5 M~T~OD F'OR DIR~CTLY DET~CTING CORROSIOI~
. . .
ON COl~DUCTIV~ CONTAINERS
SP~CIFLCATION
Field of the Invention The present invention relates to a non-destructive method for directly detecting corrosion on electrically conductive containers such as pipelines, storage vessels, pressure vessels and the like.
Background of the Invention Oil and gas pipelines located at Alaska's Prudhoe Bay are wrapped with a jacket of insulating material to prevent the rapid cooling, and provide better trans~
portability, of oil and gas fluids. The outer surface of the insulation is covered by a metal jacket for keeping out moisture. The metal jacket is typically provided in two half portions with each portion having flanges ~or aiding in the retention of the jacket on the pipeline. The two half portions of the jacket are joined together at the flanges which form seams. Water occasionally enters through the jacket seams and travels through the insulation to the 5 pipe where it causes corrosion.
Prior art methods of detecting pipeline corrosion have P
proven inadequate. For example, pigs with corrosion detection 'j equipment can only be used on pipelines that have access locations; many pipelines lack such locations. Ultrasonic detection methods require removal of the metal jacket and insulation, a timely and e~pensive procedure. Radiography detection methods are potentially hazardous and the equipment is cumbersome, requiring impractical or inconvenient adjacent vehicular support. Furthermore, with radiography methods it is often difficult to distinguish between corrosion pits filled with corrosion products and uncorroded portions of pipe walls. What is needed tnen is a method of detecting corrosion through insulation and the surrounding jacket, and which method cc~n be practiced with portable equipment.
. . .
ON COl~DUCTIV~ CONTAINERS
SP~CIFLCATION
Field of the Invention The present invention relates to a non-destructive method for directly detecting corrosion on electrically conductive containers such as pipelines, storage vessels, pressure vessels and the like.
Background of the Invention Oil and gas pipelines located at Alaska's Prudhoe Bay are wrapped with a jacket of insulating material to prevent the rapid cooling, and provide better trans~
portability, of oil and gas fluids. The outer surface of the insulation is covered by a metal jacket for keeping out moisture. The metal jacket is typically provided in two half portions with each portion having flanges ~or aiding in the retention of the jacket on the pipeline. The two half portions of the jacket are joined together at the flanges which form seams. Water occasionally enters through the jacket seams and travels through the insulation to the 5 pipe where it causes corrosion.
Prior art methods of detecting pipeline corrosion have P
proven inadequate. For example, pigs with corrosion detection 'j equipment can only be used on pipelines that have access locations; many pipelines lack such locations. Ultrasonic detection methods require removal of the metal jacket and insulation, a timely and e~pensive procedure. Radiography detection methods are potentially hazardous and the equipment is cumbersome, requiring impractical or inconvenient adjacent vehicular support. Furthermore, with radiography methods it is often difficult to distinguish between corrosion pits filled with corrosion products and uncorroded portions of pipe walls. What is needed tnen is a method of detecting corrosion through insulation and the surrounding jacket, and which method cc~n be practiced with portable equipment.
-2-Electromagnetic probing techniques provide such a method for detecting corrosion through insulation. In the prior art, frequency domain electromagnetic probing techniques are used to detect corrosion in aircraft fuel tanks.
Frequency domain electromagnetic: probing techniques utilize a small number of frequencies and measure magnitude and phase differentials between the transmitted signals and the received signals. However, because frequency domain techniques, as a practical matter, utilize only a small number of frequencies, the amount of information obtained is inherently limited, thus detracting from the accuracy of the techniques.
The application "METHOD FOR DETECTlNG CORROSION ON
CONDUCTIVE CONTAINERS" by Brian Spies (the inventor herein) and the application "M~THOD FOR DETECTING CORROSION ON
CONDUCTIVE CONTAINERS ~VING VARIATIONS IN PROTECTIV~
COVERING THICKNESS" by Pedro Lara, which applications are assigned to the assignee of the present invention and which applications are filed the same day as the present application, disclose time domain electromagnetic probing methods for use in detecting corrosion in conductive containers.
The present application discloses a method of directly detecting corrosion on conductive containers. Such a method is particularly useful on extruded pipe, on which it is difficult to indirectly detect corrosion using wall thickness measurement methods because the manufacturing process oE
extruding pipe results in larger variations of pipe wall thickness over short distances than are found in rolled and welded pipe.
It is an object of the present inven~ion to provide a method for directly detecting corrosion on insulated conductive containers.
. ~ ~
' ' ~ ''..: ,"' , , . . :
~a 6~312-188 Summary of the Invention In accordance with one a,pect, the present invention provides a method o~ detec-ting corrosion on walls of contain~r means. The walls are electrically conductive and have near surfaces and far surfaces. Transmitting antenna means ancl receiving antenna means are placed in proximity with the near surface of that portion of the container means wall which is to be investigated for corrosion. The transmitting antenna means is energized with current. The transmitting antenna means is abruptly deenergized so as to induce current into the container means wall portion. The presence of and the decay of the induced current in the container means wall portion is detected with the receiving antenna means. A record of the decay of the induced current in the container means wall portion over a period of time is created. Then, there is determined the presence or absence of a corrosion component in the record of the decay of the induced current. The corrosion component is due to the presence of corrosion products having superparamagnetic properties. The presence of a corrosion component is indicated if at relatively late times of the decay the rate of decay of the induced current decreases relative to the rate of decay of a reference record.
The reference record is obtained from an uncorroded container means wall portion, wherein the presence of a corrosion component in the record indicates the presence of corrosion on the container means wall portion.
In another aspect, the present invention provides a method of detecting corrosion on electrically conductive walls of container means. Transmitting antenna means, receiving antenna means, transmitter means connected with the transmitting antenna means and receiver means connected with the receiving antenna means are provided. The transmitting antenna means and the receiving antenna means are placed in proximity to that portion of the container means wall which is to be investigated for ~ ~2~
6~312-188 2h corrosion. An abruptly changing current is provi~ed to the transmitting antenna means from the transmitter means so as to induce current into the investigated container means wall portion. The induced current in the lnvestigated container means wall portion is detected with the receiving antenna means and the receiver means to produce a received signal. The received signal decays into noise over a period of time. The received signal has a late time range. The received signal late time range is examined to determine if a corrosion component is present in the received signal. The corrosion component is due to the presence of corrosion products on the investigated container means wall portion which corrosion products have superparamagnetic properties. The presence of the corrosion component is indicated if the rate of decay of the received signal decreases at late times, wherein if the corrosion component is present in the received signal then the container means wall portion is corroded.
In still another aspect, the present invention provides a method of detecting corrosion on electrically conductive walls of container means. Transmitting antenna means, receiving antenna means, transmitter means connected with the transmitting antenna means, and receiver means connected with the receiving antenna means are provided. The transmitting antenna means and the receiving antenna means are placed in proximity to that portion of the container means wall which is to be investigated for corrosion. An abruptly changing current is provided to the transmitting antenna means from the transmitter means so as to induce current into the investigated container means wall portion. The induced current in the investigated container means wall portion is detected with the receiving antenna means and the receiver means to produce a received signal. The received signal decays into noise over a period of time. The received signal has a late time range. The received signal late time range is examined to determine if a corrosion component is present in the ;:
~' '': ' ,., ' 2c 6~312-188 received signal. The corrosion component is due to the presence of corrosion products on the investigated container means ~all portion which corrosion products have superparamagnetic properties. The presence of the corrosion component is indicated if the rate of decay of the received signal decreases relative to the rate of decay of a reference signal. The reference signal is obtained from an uncorroded container means wall portion.
In still another aspect, the present invention provides a method of detecting corrosion products on container means. The corrosion products include magnetite, hematite or maghemite.
Transmitting antenna means, receiving antenna means, transmitter means connected with the transmitting antenna means, and receiver means connected with the receiving antenna means is provided.
The transmitting antenna means and the receiving antenna means are placed in proximity to that portion of the container means that is to be investigated for corrosion. An abruptly changing current i5 provided to the transmitting antenna means from the transmitter means so as to induce current into the investigated container means wall portion. The induced current in the investigated container means wall portion is detected with the receiving antenna means and the receiver means to produce a received signal. The received signal decays into noise over a period of time ~nd has late time ranges. The received signal late time range is examined to determine if corrosion products are present on the investigated container means portion. The corrosion products exhibit superparamagnetic behavior. The presence of the corrosion products on the investigated container means portion is indicated by determining if the rate of decay of the received signal decreases relative to the rate of decay of a reference signal. The reference signal is obtained from an uncorroded containex means wall portion.
~ ~ 7~ ~ ~S
Brief Description of the Drawin~s Fig. 1 is a schematic diagram showing a typical sit-uation in which the method for detecting corrosion in a container in accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present invention can be practiced, together with typical testing apparatus.
Fig. 2 is a schematic diagram showing a transverse cross-section of the pipeline of Fig. 1.
Fig. 3 is a schematic cross-sectional view showing the antenna means of Fig. 2 in detail.
Fig. 4 is a graph showing the time domain response curves of various conductors, obtained by the transient electromagnetic probing (T~MP) method of the present invention.
Fig. 5 is a graph of the response curve of a pit in a pipe wall, with the response curve obtained by computing the ratio of the "corrosion" to the "no corrosion" response curves of Fig. ~.
Fig. 6 is a graph showing a longitudinal cross-sectional TEMP profile of the pi~ of Fig. 5, with the profile being obtained by averaging the late time responses at each antenna means location.
Fig. 7 is a graph showing the effects of the jacket flanges and of variations in antenna means height on time doMain responses of pipe walls.
Fig. 8a is a circumferential map of a portion of a pipe showing both the location of corrosion and the ultrasonic wall thickness measur~ments. ~~
Fig. 8b is a graph showing transverse T~MP profiles of the unjacketed pipe of Fig. 8a, taken along line A-A.
Fig. 8c is a graph showing transverse TEMP profiles of the jacketed pipe of Fig. 8a, taken along line A-A, with the TEi~P profiles corrected for the effects of the jacket flanges.
Fig. 8d is a graph showing the same T~MP profiles as in Fig. 8c, but uncorrected for the effects of the jacket flanges.
.r ~ ~ r ~4~
Fig. 9 is a graph showing a plurality of time domain response curves for various pipes, there being showni a plurality of response curves for each pipe taken at different locations on each pipe, with the response curves corrected for variations in distance between the antenna means and the pipe walls.
Fig. 10 is a graph showing a plurality of response curves for a pipe taken at different locations on the pipe, with the response curves corrected for vari.ations in distance between the antenna means and the pipe wall, there being shown a nomogram superimposed on the corrected response curves.
Fig. 11 is a graph showing time domain response curves of various conductors, obtained by the transient electro-magnetic probing (TEMP) method of the present invention.
Fig. 12 is a graph showing processed response curves,the response curves having been processed by determining the rate of decay of the response curves of Fig. 11.
Fig. 13 is a graph showing time domain response curves for a portion of a pipe wall.
Fig. 14 is a graph showing processed response curves, the response curves having been processed by determining the rate of decay of the response curves of Fig. 13.
Description of Preferred Embodiment Part A
In Figs. 1-3 there is schematically shown a typical situation in which the method of detecting corrosion in electrically conductive containers 11 can be practiced, together with typical detecting apparatus 25. The method of the present invention utilizes transient electro-magnetic probing (TEMP) to detect corrosion.
The conductive con~ainer shown in Figs. 1-3 is a portion of a pipeline 11, which is of course made up of a plurality of individual pipes 13. The pipes 13 have a diameter and the pipe walls 15 have a thickness. The pipe walls 15 are made up of an electrically conductive material such as steel.
, ' '.
~ 65 In ~laska's Prudhoe Bay region, pipelines wrapped with insulating material 17 are used to transport oil and gas fluids. The insulation 17 is provided to prevent rapid cooling of the oil and gas fluids in the pipeline and thus provide better transportability of these fluids in the pipeline. In refineries, pipelines and vessels are commonly wrapped with insulation as a safety measure in protecting personnel from high temperatures. The insulation 17 on pipelines is typically a thermoplastic foam such as poly-styrene, and has a radial thickness. Surrounding theinsulation 17 is a metal jacket: 19 which is provided to keep out moisture. The jacket 19 has a thickness which is much less than the thickness of the pipe wall. The metal jacket 19 has two half portions that extend longitudinally along the pipeline. Each jacket half portion has seam means in the form of flanges 21 that extend radially outward. When the jacket half portions are assembled onto the pipeline, the respective flanges 21 abut one ano~her to form seams.
The half portions are retained in place on a pipeline by securing the respective flanges together with suitable means.
Ln Fig. 3, the pipe wall 15 is shown to have a corrosion pit 23 adjacent to the insulation. The corrosio~ acts to reduce the thickness of the pipe wall, wherein it forms the pit and fills the pit with corrosion products. The corrosion that has pitted the pipe wall is caused by water that has entered the insulation between the jacket flanges 21.
Detecting apparatus 25 is provided near that portion of the pipe wall which is to be tested for corrosion and includes antenna means 27, a transmitter 29, a receiver and amplifier 31, and a digital computer 33.
The antenna means 27 include a transmitting antenna coil 35, a receiving antenna coil 37 and core means 39. In the preferred Pmbodiment, the transmitting and receiving antenna coils 35, 37 are wound onto the same core means 39, an arrangement which is hereinafter referred to as coincident . ~ , , .
,, , (see Fig. 3). The core means 39, which is in the shape of a spool, is made of a non-magnetic and non-conductive material such as plastic. The number of turns o~ the transmitting antenna coil are kept to a minimum to minimize the inductance of the transmitting antenna and to provide for an abrupt switching off of the transmitting antenna coil. In the preferred embodiment, the transmitting antenna coil 35 is made up of 120 turns of 20 to 24 gauge wire. The receiving antenna coil 37 is made up of 400 turns of 34 to 40 gauge wire. The transmitting and receiving antenna coils 35, 37 are connected to the transmitter 29 and receiver 31 by respective pairs of wires 41, 43.
The transmitter 29 which is conventional, generates a train of pulses having magnitudes of 1 to 5 amps. As discussed in more detail below, a plurality of pulses are transmitted for each location of the antenna means 27 for data enhancement purposes. The pulses have abrupt fall times on the order of 10 to 100 microseconds. The pulses of the transmitter pulse train alternate polarity to eliminate dc bias in the instrumentation. The duration of each pulse is sufficiently long to stabilize the pulse magnitude so that there are no induced currents in the pipe wall before the end of the pulse. The transmitter 29 repeats the pulses at a repetition rate that allows all of the necessary data to be obtained or each pulse. For example, a thick pipe wall requires more time to obtain data than does a thinner pipe wall because the induced current takes longer to diffuse in the thick pipe wall. Thus, tha repetition rate of pulses will typically be slower for thick pipe walls than for thinner pipe walls.
The receiver and amplifier 31 is a broad band instrument with a wide (5 or 6 orders of magnitude) dynamic range. The receiver 31, which has an A/D converter, samples the signal at a constant rate and integrates the signal over a time window or channel. The duration of the time windows increases .:'"'' .
: ~ :
. ..
:
with time. The transmitter 29 and the receiver and amplifier 31 are conventional. In practice it has been found that the SIROT~M transmitter, receiver and amplifier unit manu-factured by Geoex Pty. Ltd. of Adelaide, Australia, works well. The battery operated SIROTEM unit is portable, a characteristic which allows ease of use when surveying pipelines in the field.
The digital computer 33 is a conventional portable computer with sufficient memory capacity to record the data.
The method of detecting corrosion on a conductive container of the present invention will now be described.
As mentioned earlier, the method of the present invention utilizes transient electromagnetic probing (T~i~P). TEMP
allows the remote probing of a conductor by inducin~ a current into the conductor and then analyzing the decay of the current.
First, the antenna means 27 is placed on the jacket 19 so as to be in proximity with the near surface 45 of the portion of the pipeline 11 that is to be investigated.
Suitable means (not shown) are used to secure the antenna means 27 in position so as to minimize any motion of the antenna means over the investigated pipe wall portion. The transmitting antenna coil 35 is then energize~ by the transmitter 29 with a pulse. As described above, the transmitting antenna coil 35 is energized for a sufficient period of time to stabilize tlle pulse ma~nitude, therebY
insuring no eddy currents are induced into the pipeline 11.
Then, the transmitting coil 35 is abruptly de-energized by the transmitter by having the pulse fall off rapidly to zero magnitude. This abrupt de-energi~.ation of the transmitting antenna coil 35 induces eddy currents into the conductors located near the coil; namely the jacket 19 and the pipe wall 15. The eddy currents, which decay and diffuse away from the antenna means 27 inside of the respective conductors, create a magnetic field that is detected as a time-varying voltage in the receiving antenna coil 37. As soon as the -transmitting antenna coil is de-energized, the receiver 31 is then switched on. The receiving antenna coil 37 detects the presence of and the decay of the induced eddy currents in the conductors. The eddy currents are gradually dissi-pated within the conductors by resistive heat losses. Therate of diffusion is dependent on the conductivity and thickness of the conductor. The receiver 31 samples the signal as detected by the receiving antenna coil 37, where-upon it is amplified to a suitable level and sent to the digital computer 33 for storage and processing. The receiver 31 measures the signal from the time the eddy currents are first induced into the conductors until the signal becomes indistinguishable from noise. The level of noise is reduced by minimizing any motion of the receiving antenna coil 37 relative to the conductors. The received signal is unpro-cessed data and forms a record in the computer 33 of the decay of the induced currents in the conductors. The transmitting and receiving procedure is repeated many times with the antenna means 27 in the same location to increase the signal-to-noise ratio.
The data is then processed by computer data processing means into a suitable format for interpretation. The first steps in the processing of the data involve the normalization of the received signals and the summing and averaging of the received signals. Because the transmitter 29 in the preferred embodiment is battery operated, the magnitude of the trans-mitter current is subject to variation. The effects of variation in magnitude in the data are removed by normalizing the received voltage to the transmitted current. The summing and averaging of the received signals for a particular antenna means location serves to increase the signal-to-noise ratio. In particularly noisy environments, as an alternative to summing and averaging, selective stacking can ~e used to eliminate noisy transients. The result of this initial data processing is a time-varying response curve , ..
~::
~2'~
such as shown in Fig. 4. (Fig 4 illustrates response curves for various conductors.) The response curves may be interpreted in accordance with methods which will now be described, with reference to Figs. ~-8d. Referring in particular to Fig. 4, the presence or absence of corrosion on a conductor wall is inferred by ex~mining the shape of the various response curves which have been taken over the area of interest. The shape of each response curve depends in part on the thickness of the conductor wall. For example, the magnitude of the response curve of an infinitely thick conductor wall decays at a fairly even rate (on a log-log ~raph), resulting in a fairly straight response curve, whereas the response curve of a conductor having a finite wall thickness begins to break at some point into a more pronounced downward direction than before and decays at a faster rate. This breaking pheno-menon is attributed to the induced currents diffusing to and reaching the far surface 47 of the conductor wall. Response curves for thin conductor walls break at earlier times than do response curves for thicker conductor walls.
Because corrosion reduces the thickness of a conductor wall, the presence or absence of corrosion can be inferred by comparing the shape of the response curve for the inves-tigated pipe wall portion to the shape of the response curve for an uncorroded portion of the same type of pipe. For example, in Fig. 4, the two response curves labeled "corrosion"
and "no corrosion" are taken from the same pipe. The "no corrosion" response curve is taken from an uncorroded portion of the pipe and is used as a reference, while the "corrosion"
response curve is taken from a different portion of the same pipe, which different portion has a pit to simulate corrosion (with the antenna means located at the same distance from the pipe wall, for both response curves). At about 17 ms (milliseconds), the "corrosion" response curve breaks into a more pronounced downward direction and begins to decay at a faster rate than before. The "corrosion" break point occurs at an earlier time than does the "no corrosion" break point `~
~'7~
(at about 25 ms), indlcating that the conductor wall rep-resented by the "corrosion" response cu:rve is thinner than the conductor wall represented by the "no corrosion" response curve.
Referring now to Fig. 5, the "corrosion" and "no corrosion" response curves of Fig. 4 are compared by plotting the ratio of the two curves as a percent response curve, using the "no corrosion" response curve as a reference. The percent response curve highlights the differences between the "corrosion" and the "no corrosion" response curves. By examining the late time portions of the percent response curve (from about 17-20 ms on, which is about when the "corrosion"
response curve of Fig. 4 begins to break sharply downward), one can see that the "corrosion" response curve deviates 20 to 30 percent from the "no corrosion" response curve. This 20 to 30 percent difference clearly indicates a difference in wall thickness between the corroded portion of the pipe and the uncorroded portion of the pipe.
In Fig. 4, the response curve labeled "jacket only" is that taken from the metal jacket 19, without the pipe 13. The "jacket only" response curve decays very rapidly so that by the relatively late time of 20 ms, the jacket 19 contributes very little to the total response. This is because the wall thickness of the jacket is much smaller than is the thickness of the pipe wall, so the currents diffuse much more rapidly in the jacket. Thus, for those portions of the "jacket and pipe" response curves that are o~ interest in locating corrosion (that is the later times), the effect of the jacket can be ignored.
Responses measured near jacket flanges are affected quite strongly by the jacket flanges at all times, as shown in Fig. 7. A response measured near jacket flanges can be corrected to remove the effects of the jacket flanges by normalizing the affected response curve to a reerence response curve obtained away from the jacket flanges. As shown in Fig. 7, an effect of the jacket flanges on the response curve is a generally parallel shift in a downward .,.. :
.
. . .
..
~ ~ ~x ~
~ ~ ~a direction in the intermediate and late time ranges (later than about 4 ms). That is to say that in the intermediate and late time ranges, the affected response curve is generally parallel to the reference response curves. The affected response curve is corrected by normali7ing the affected response curve to the reference response curve in the intermediate time range.
Fig. 7 also serves to illustrate the effect that variations in distance between the antenna means and the pipe wall at one location on the pipe and between the antenna means and the pipe wall at another location on the pipe can have on responses. Such variations in distance result from non-uniform thicknesses of the insulation between the pipe wall and the jacket. Increasing the distance of the antenna means from the pipe wall causes the magnitude of the response to decrease at intermediate and late times, which decrease in magnitude shows up as a generally parallel shift. The responses can be corrected to remove the effects of varia-tions in distance by normalizing the response curves to a reference response curve obtained with the antenna means at some known distance, in the intermediate time range.
The antenna means 27 gives a reading of the average conductor wall thickness over a search area. The size of the search area depends upon antenna size, antenna config-uration and the duration of the receiver measuring time after each transmitter pulse. The search area of the antenna means increases with larger antenna sizes or with longer measuring times. In the preferred embodiment, the antenna means 27 has a diameter of about 3 inches. For a 10.5 inch pipe, the search area is about 12 inches in diameter.
In the usual case, the portion of the pipeline that is to be investigated for corrosion is much larger than the search area of the antenna means. Therefore, a typical pipe survey requires the antenna means to be moved to new .;
~.
. .
~LX7~:~6~
locations to complete the survey. In Figs. 8a through 8dthere are shown a corrosion map of a pipe section and corresponding T~MP surveys or profiles along line A-A of the pipe section. In obtaining the T~MP profiles of Figs. 8b through 8d, the antenna means was positioned at various locations along line A-A. In Fig. 8a, the numbers along line 8a indicate ultrasonic point measurements of the wall thickness (in inches) and the shaded areas indicate heavy corrosion, wherein the thickness of the pipe wall is less than for the unshaded areas. The map shows that the pipe wall along line A-A is thickest around 180 and gets thinner moving towards 0 and 360.
Fig. 8b shows TEMP profiles of the pipe of Fig. 8a along line A-A, without a metal jacket. In Fig. 8b only those values of the response curve at selected discrete instances of time for each antenna means location are plotted.
The response curve values at equivalent instances of time are then connected together to form a TEMP profile. Thus, for each antenna means location, the response curve values at time=8.5 ms, 32.8 ms, 67 ms, 79 ms, 92 ms, and 105 ms are plot~ed, forming respective T~MP profiles of pipe wall thickness. Each TEMP profile is normalized to the T~MP
response obtained over the thickest portion of the pipe. As can be seen in Fig. 8b, the TEMP profiles show that in moving away from 180 in either direction (towards 0 and towards 360) the pipe wall thickness lessens and is thinnest around 0 to 60 and 320 to 360. The late time TEMP profiles (67 ms and greater) in particular clearly show the reduced wall thickness, corresponding with the pipe corrosion map of Fig. 8a.
In Fig. 8c, there are shown TEMP profiles of the pipe of Fig. 8a along line A-A, but with a metal jacket. The TEMP profiles of Fig. 8c were obtained in the same manner as the TEMP profiles of Fig. 8b. The jacket flanges, which are '"~ .;
located at approximately 95 and 270, have caused reductions in the amplitudes of the TEMP profile portions near the flanges. The T~MP profiles of Fig. 8c have been corrected to reduce the effects of the jacket flanges by normalizing the responses measured near the jacket flanges to a response measured away from the jacket flanges. The responses are normalized in the in~ermediate time range (3-6 ms) and the late times (32 ms and greater) are then analyzed. (In Fig. 8d there are shown the TEMP profiles of Fig. 8c before the profiles have been corrected for the effects of the jacket flanges.) There is a good correlation between the T~MP
profiles of Fig. 8c and the corrosion map of Fig. 8a. The TEMP profiles of Fig. 8c show that the pipe wall is reduced in thickness around 0 to 60 and 320 to 360, thus leading to an inference of corrosion at those locations.
Figs. 8a through 8d illustrate an advan~ageous dif-ference of the T~MP method over the ultrasonic method. The ultrasonic method makes point measurements, requiring a large number of measurements, whereas the antenna means of the TEMP method has a large search area requiring fewer measurements. While the ultrasonic measurements in Fig. 8a are essentially confined to line A-A, the TEMP measurements encompass portions of the pipe extending for a few inches to either side of line A-A. Furthermore, ultrasonic measurements must be made on the bare pipe, while TEMP measurements can be made on the jacket.
For TEMP profiles such as are shown in Figs. 8b-8d, the effects on the responses due to the variations in distance between the antenna means and the pipe wall, which variations are caused by moving the antenna means from one location on the pipe to another location, can be corrected for by creating reference response curves with the antenna means placed at a number of known distances from the pipe wall. The inter-mediate times of the response curves having distance error are then normalized to the intermediate times of the respective reference response curves.
In Fig. 6, there is shown a TEMP pro~ile of the corrosion pit of Fig. 5. The TEMP profile is obtained by moving the antenna means to a plurality of locations and averaging the responses for the 25 to 52 ms time window at each antenna means location. The physical extent of the corrosion pit is indicated at the bottom le~t corner of the graph, which shows the pit to have a radius of about 8 inches. The T~MP
profile of Fig. 6 shows a good correlation to the physical profile. From about 17 inches on, the ThMP profile shows a slight decrease in magnitude due to the induced currents interacting with the nearby pipe end.
Another method of interpretation of the response curves of Fig. 4 involves examining the time at which the far surface 47 of the pipe wall is initially manifested in the response curve~ This time is referred to as the "critical time", and is that point where the response curve begins to break into a more pronounced downward direction than before, as discussed hereinbefore (see Fig. 4). The wall thickness of the pipe is proportional to the square root of the critical time. The constant or factor of proportionality is dependent on the geometry and the conductivity of the pipe, and may be determined by making a determination of the critical time of a particular thickness of the pipe.
The method of the present invention can be used to make quantitative measurements of wall thickness, once the instruments and data have been calibrated on pipes of known thickness and conductivity. Once the actual wall thickness of the investigated pipe is known, comparison to the manu-factured wall thickness leads to a determination of wall loss due to corrosion on -the investigated pipe.
PART ~
Another method for correcting error in the responses due to variations in distance between the antenna means and the pipe wall from one location along the pipe to another location will now be described, with reference to Figs. 9 and 10.
.. . .
. . .
- :
... .
., . ~ . .-. ~. :,:,;,.. . ..
:"- '' .
.~ ~
In Fig. 9 there are shown a plurality of TEMP response curves (plotted as discrete values instead of as continuous values) that have been corrected for effects due to variations in distance between the antenna means and the pipe walls.
Fig. 9 illustrates the corrected response curves for a forty-two inch diameter pipe (with a pipe wall thickness of 0.438 inches), a twelvP~inch diameter pipe (with a pipe wall thickness of 0.406 inches), and a thirty-inch diameter pipe (with a pipe wall thickness of 0.3~4 inches).
For each pipe, numerous TEMP surveys were taken at different locations along the pipe. The TEMP surveys were obtained through lnsulation 17 and a metal jacket 19. The thickness of the insulation along each pipe varied as much as fifty percent, thus causing the distance between the antenna means and the pipe walls to vary by the same amount.
The record of the decay of induced current in a pipe wall (as shown by the respective designated response curves of Fig. 4) is corrected for the variations in distance by determining with respect to time the rate of decay of the induced current. Correcting for variations in distance by determining the rate of decay of induced current recognizes the phenomenon that variation in distance between the antenna means and the pipe wall affects the magnitude of the response, but does not affect the rate of decay of the response. In Fig. 9, the corrected response curves shown illustrate the respective rates of decay of uncorrected TEMP survey responses obtained from the pipes. The rates of decay were obtained by taking the logarithmic derivative (d(ln V)/d(ln t);
where V is the received voltage and t is time) of the uncorrected TEMP survey responses. (Central difference numerical methods were used to obtain the graphs of Figs. 9 and 10.) As can be seen, in spite of the variations in insulation thickness, the vertical scatter among the corrected TEMP surveys for each pipe is small, and is in fact due to variations in pipe wall thickness. Thus, by determining the rates of decay of the responses J the effects .:
of variation in distance between the antenna means and the pipe wall have been correc-ted for. The presence or absence of corrosion in the pipe wall is inferred by the interpretation methods discussed hereinabove.
The rate of decay correction method also allows the quantitative determination of wall thickness. As the induced currents diffuse through the conductor walls from the near surface 45 (see Fig. 3), the responses decay at a constant logarithmic rate of about -1.5. Then, as the induced currents begin to interact with the far surface 47 of the conductor wall, the responses decay at increasing rates.
The time of departure of a response decay rate from the constant logarithmic rate of about -1.5 is a function of the pipe wall thickness and the pipe diameter. The corrected responses of thinner pipe walls break downwardly at an earlier time than do the corrected responses of thicker pipe walls. Increases in pipe diameter cause the responses to break downwardly at later times. After the induced current reaches the far surface of the pipe wall, the rate of decay of the response approaches asymptotically a constant second derivative. This asymptotic portion of the rate of decay of the response is independent of the thickness of the pipe wall or the pipe diameter and has been determined empirically to be:
d(ln V)/d(ln t) ~ A-2.17 ln t;
where A is a function of pipe wall thickness, pipe diameter, and pipe metallurgy. The asymptotic characterisic of the rate of decay Gf the response, coupled with the time of departure of a response decay rate being dependent upon the pipe wall thickness allows the construction of nomograms that can be superimposed on the corrected response curves.
The nomograms are constructed from numerous reference records which are created by inducing current into pipe walls of known thickness and substantially similar diameters.
In Fig. 10, there is shown a nomogram consisting of straight ,., ~ , :.
., "': '~' .
~'7X ~ 6 lines suyerimposed on corrected response curves (T~MP surveys A, B, and C) obtained from various locations along a corroded eight-inch diameter pipe. Thus, it can be seen by extra-polatory comparisons between the individual T~MP surveys and the nomogram that the pipe wall portion that was probed with TEMP survey A had a thickness of about 0.46 inches, the portion that was probed with T~P survey B had a thickness of about 0.43 inches, and the portion that was probed with TEMP survey C had a thickness of about 0.~1 inches. From these quantitative pipe wall thiickness measurements, the presence or absence of corrosion on the pipe wall can be inferred.
~ART C
A method of directly detecting corrosion on pipe walls will now be described with reference to ~igs. 11-14.
Such a method is particularly useful for detecting corrosion on the walls of extruded pipe. Due to the extrusion process used during manufacturing, the pipe wall thickness of extruded pipe varies over relatively large tolerances, and cannot always be used to directly infer the presence of corrosion.
The method of directly detecting corrosion utilizes my discovery that the corrosion scale or products on steel pipes exhibits superparamagnetic properties. Superpara-magnetism, or viscous magnetization as it is also known, is a property wherein the magnetic susceptibility of a material is effectively time-dependent. Most materials are not superparamagnetic; the magnetic flux density B reacts almost instantaneously to changes in the applied magnetic field H. ~owever, in superparamagnetic materials, the magnetic flux density B reacts somewhat sluggishly to changes in the magnetic field. Superparamagnetism has been observed in magnetite, maghemite and hematite. Analysis of corrosion scale taken from NGI gas pipelines reveal that the scale is predominantly composed of magnetite and hematite, with some -~, ~ ~2 ~ 65 maghemite and manganese dioxide, and exhibits T~MP behavior indicative of superparamagnetism.
The detection of corrosion scale having superpara-magnetic properties begins with the utilization of the TEMP
metho~s described hereinabove. In Figs. 11 and 12 there are shown respective TEMP response curves for a pipe and a bag of corrosion products. The response curves for the pipe behaves as described hereinabove. The response curve for the corrosion products dec:ays at a constant rate described as a l/t time relationshlp (a slope of -1 on a log log scale).
The constant (l/t) rate of decay of the response curve for the corrosion products results from the superparamagnetic property of the corrosion products. At relatively early and intermediate times, the magnitude of the response curve of the corrosion products is much smaller than the magnitude of the response curve of the pipe. At relatively late times, the response curve of the pipe decays at a much faster rate than does the response curve of the corrosion products`, causing the magnitude of the pipe response curve to first approach the corrosion products response curve in magnitude and then to diminish in magnitude relative to the corrosion products response curve. Thus, for a corroded portion of pipe, the TEMP response of the pipe portion has a response component due to the pipe wall and a response component due to the corrosion, with the pipe wall component overwhelmingly predominating at relatively early and intermediate times and the corrosion component detectable at relatively late times.
Figs. 13 and 14 illu~trate an application of the method of the present invention, in accordance with a preferred embodiment. Figs. 13 and 14 show respective TEMP response curves obtained from a 10.5 inch diameter NGI pipe. The "corrosion" response curve was ob~ained with the antenna means placed over a patch of corrosion scale on the pipe with an approximate thickness of 1/8 inch (corresponding to a wall thickness loss of about three percent). The "no corrosion" response curve was obtained with the antenna means placed over an uncorrod~d portion of the pipe. Fig.
-' ;~,, : , : .-,.. -..
' :" - '' ' ~
,~ ~"' ' 1~, in particular, shows the difference between the two response curves. In Fig. 1~, the response curves of Fig.
13 were processed to enhance the corros:Lon component or lack thereof by determining the respective rates of decay.
At relatively late times (from about 80 ms on) the "corrosion"
response curve has a decrease in the magnitude o~ the rate of decay, shown as an upward inc:lination o~ the "corrosion"
response curve, whereas the "no corrosion" response curve continues to decay at an increasing rate. This slowing of the decay rate of the "corrosion" response curve at relatively late times is caused by the corrosion scale component of the response curve which becomes detectable in the overall response of the corroded portion of pipe. At relatively late times, the magnitude of the pipe wall component of the "corrosion" response curve first approaches the magnitude of the corrosion scale component and then diminishes relative to the corrosion scale component since the pipe wall component magnitude decreases at an increasing rate of decay. If the TEMP system signal-to-noise ratio is sufficiently large, the TE~P response of the pipe can be detected ~or a sufficient length of time so that the corrosion scale component pre-dominates over the pipe wall component.
The above described method can be used on insulated and uninsulated pipes or containers.
An important aspect of the method of the present invention is that corrosion on a container means wall can be directly detected, regardless of variations in the thickness of the container means wall. The method utilizes my discovery that corrosion scale on steel pipes has superparamagnetic properties.
Although the method of the present invention has been described for use in detecting corrosion on pipelines, the method may also be used to detect corrosion on the electri-cally cond~lctive walls of other types of container means such as storage vessels and pressure vessels. In addition, the method of the present invention can be used on uninsulated as well as insulated container means.
~ ~ .
"
. .
S
'~he antenna means can have the transmitting antenna and receiving antenna configured in arrangements other than the coincident arrangement described herein. One such arrangement has the transmitting antenna separate but coplanar with the receiving antenna. Another arrangement has a plurality of receiving antennas located ~ithin a large transmitting antenna loop.
Although this invention has been described with a certain degree of particularity, it is understood that the present disclosure is made only by way of e~ample and that numerous changes in the details of construction and the combination and arrangement of parts may be resorted to without departing from the spirit and the scope of the invention, reference being had for the latter purpose to the appended claims.
- ,, .
Frequency domain electromagnetic: probing techniques utilize a small number of frequencies and measure magnitude and phase differentials between the transmitted signals and the received signals. However, because frequency domain techniques, as a practical matter, utilize only a small number of frequencies, the amount of information obtained is inherently limited, thus detracting from the accuracy of the techniques.
The application "METHOD FOR DETECTlNG CORROSION ON
CONDUCTIVE CONTAINERS" by Brian Spies (the inventor herein) and the application "M~THOD FOR DETECTING CORROSION ON
CONDUCTIVE CONTAINERS ~VING VARIATIONS IN PROTECTIV~
COVERING THICKNESS" by Pedro Lara, which applications are assigned to the assignee of the present invention and which applications are filed the same day as the present application, disclose time domain electromagnetic probing methods for use in detecting corrosion in conductive containers.
The present application discloses a method of directly detecting corrosion on conductive containers. Such a method is particularly useful on extruded pipe, on which it is difficult to indirectly detect corrosion using wall thickness measurement methods because the manufacturing process oE
extruding pipe results in larger variations of pipe wall thickness over short distances than are found in rolled and welded pipe.
It is an object of the present inven~ion to provide a method for directly detecting corrosion on insulated conductive containers.
. ~ ~
' ' ~ ''..: ,"' , , . . :
~a 6~312-188 Summary of the Invention In accordance with one a,pect, the present invention provides a method o~ detec-ting corrosion on walls of contain~r means. The walls are electrically conductive and have near surfaces and far surfaces. Transmitting antenna means ancl receiving antenna means are placed in proximity with the near surface of that portion of the container means wall which is to be investigated for corrosion. The transmitting antenna means is energized with current. The transmitting antenna means is abruptly deenergized so as to induce current into the container means wall portion. The presence of and the decay of the induced current in the container means wall portion is detected with the receiving antenna means. A record of the decay of the induced current in the container means wall portion over a period of time is created. Then, there is determined the presence or absence of a corrosion component in the record of the decay of the induced current. The corrosion component is due to the presence of corrosion products having superparamagnetic properties. The presence of a corrosion component is indicated if at relatively late times of the decay the rate of decay of the induced current decreases relative to the rate of decay of a reference record.
The reference record is obtained from an uncorroded container means wall portion, wherein the presence of a corrosion component in the record indicates the presence of corrosion on the container means wall portion.
In another aspect, the present invention provides a method of detecting corrosion on electrically conductive walls of container means. Transmitting antenna means, receiving antenna means, transmitter means connected with the transmitting antenna means and receiver means connected with the receiving antenna means are provided. The transmitting antenna means and the receiving antenna means are placed in proximity to that portion of the container means wall which is to be investigated for ~ ~2~
6~312-188 2h corrosion. An abruptly changing current is provi~ed to the transmitting antenna means from the transmitter means so as to induce current into the investigated container means wall portion. The induced current in the lnvestigated container means wall portion is detected with the receiving antenna means and the receiver means to produce a received signal. The received signal decays into noise over a period of time. The received signal has a late time range. The received signal late time range is examined to determine if a corrosion component is present in the received signal. The corrosion component is due to the presence of corrosion products on the investigated container means wall portion which corrosion products have superparamagnetic properties. The presence of the corrosion component is indicated if the rate of decay of the received signal decreases at late times, wherein if the corrosion component is present in the received signal then the container means wall portion is corroded.
In still another aspect, the present invention provides a method of detecting corrosion on electrically conductive walls of container means. Transmitting antenna means, receiving antenna means, transmitter means connected with the transmitting antenna means, and receiver means connected with the receiving antenna means are provided. The transmitting antenna means and the receiving antenna means are placed in proximity to that portion of the container means wall which is to be investigated for corrosion. An abruptly changing current is provided to the transmitting antenna means from the transmitter means so as to induce current into the investigated container means wall portion. The induced current in the investigated container means wall portion is detected with the receiving antenna means and the receiver means to produce a received signal. The received signal decays into noise over a period of time. The received signal has a late time range. The received signal late time range is examined to determine if a corrosion component is present in the ;:
~' '': ' ,., ' 2c 6~312-188 received signal. The corrosion component is due to the presence of corrosion products on the investigated container means ~all portion which corrosion products have superparamagnetic properties. The presence of the corrosion component is indicated if the rate of decay of the received signal decreases relative to the rate of decay of a reference signal. The reference signal is obtained from an uncorroded container means wall portion.
In still another aspect, the present invention provides a method of detecting corrosion products on container means. The corrosion products include magnetite, hematite or maghemite.
Transmitting antenna means, receiving antenna means, transmitter means connected with the transmitting antenna means, and receiver means connected with the receiving antenna means is provided.
The transmitting antenna means and the receiving antenna means are placed in proximity to that portion of the container means that is to be investigated for corrosion. An abruptly changing current i5 provided to the transmitting antenna means from the transmitter means so as to induce current into the investigated container means wall portion. The induced current in the investigated container means wall portion is detected with the receiving antenna means and the receiver means to produce a received signal. The received signal decays into noise over a period of time ~nd has late time ranges. The received signal late time range is examined to determine if corrosion products are present on the investigated container means portion. The corrosion products exhibit superparamagnetic behavior. The presence of the corrosion products on the investigated container means portion is indicated by determining if the rate of decay of the received signal decreases relative to the rate of decay of a reference signal. The reference signal is obtained from an uncorroded containex means wall portion.
~ ~ 7~ ~ ~S
Brief Description of the Drawin~s Fig. 1 is a schematic diagram showing a typical sit-uation in which the method for detecting corrosion in a container in accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present invention can be practiced, together with typical testing apparatus.
Fig. 2 is a schematic diagram showing a transverse cross-section of the pipeline of Fig. 1.
Fig. 3 is a schematic cross-sectional view showing the antenna means of Fig. 2 in detail.
Fig. 4 is a graph showing the time domain response curves of various conductors, obtained by the transient electromagnetic probing (T~MP) method of the present invention.
Fig. 5 is a graph of the response curve of a pit in a pipe wall, with the response curve obtained by computing the ratio of the "corrosion" to the "no corrosion" response curves of Fig. ~.
Fig. 6 is a graph showing a longitudinal cross-sectional TEMP profile of the pi~ of Fig. 5, with the profile being obtained by averaging the late time responses at each antenna means location.
Fig. 7 is a graph showing the effects of the jacket flanges and of variations in antenna means height on time doMain responses of pipe walls.
Fig. 8a is a circumferential map of a portion of a pipe showing both the location of corrosion and the ultrasonic wall thickness measur~ments. ~~
Fig. 8b is a graph showing transverse T~MP profiles of the unjacketed pipe of Fig. 8a, taken along line A-A.
Fig. 8c is a graph showing transverse TEMP profiles of the jacketed pipe of Fig. 8a, taken along line A-A, with the TEi~P profiles corrected for the effects of the jacket flanges.
Fig. 8d is a graph showing the same T~MP profiles as in Fig. 8c, but uncorrected for the effects of the jacket flanges.
.r ~ ~ r ~4~
Fig. 9 is a graph showing a plurality of time domain response curves for various pipes, there being showni a plurality of response curves for each pipe taken at different locations on each pipe, with the response curves corrected for variations in distance between the antenna means and the pipe walls.
Fig. 10 is a graph showing a plurality of response curves for a pipe taken at different locations on the pipe, with the response curves corrected for vari.ations in distance between the antenna means and the pipe wall, there being shown a nomogram superimposed on the corrected response curves.
Fig. 11 is a graph showing time domain response curves of various conductors, obtained by the transient electro-magnetic probing (TEMP) method of the present invention.
Fig. 12 is a graph showing processed response curves,the response curves having been processed by determining the rate of decay of the response curves of Fig. 11.
Fig. 13 is a graph showing time domain response curves for a portion of a pipe wall.
Fig. 14 is a graph showing processed response curves, the response curves having been processed by determining the rate of decay of the response curves of Fig. 13.
Description of Preferred Embodiment Part A
In Figs. 1-3 there is schematically shown a typical situation in which the method of detecting corrosion in electrically conductive containers 11 can be practiced, together with typical detecting apparatus 25. The method of the present invention utilizes transient electro-magnetic probing (TEMP) to detect corrosion.
The conductive con~ainer shown in Figs. 1-3 is a portion of a pipeline 11, which is of course made up of a plurality of individual pipes 13. The pipes 13 have a diameter and the pipe walls 15 have a thickness. The pipe walls 15 are made up of an electrically conductive material such as steel.
, ' '.
~ 65 In ~laska's Prudhoe Bay region, pipelines wrapped with insulating material 17 are used to transport oil and gas fluids. The insulation 17 is provided to prevent rapid cooling of the oil and gas fluids in the pipeline and thus provide better transportability of these fluids in the pipeline. In refineries, pipelines and vessels are commonly wrapped with insulation as a safety measure in protecting personnel from high temperatures. The insulation 17 on pipelines is typically a thermoplastic foam such as poly-styrene, and has a radial thickness. Surrounding theinsulation 17 is a metal jacket: 19 which is provided to keep out moisture. The jacket 19 has a thickness which is much less than the thickness of the pipe wall. The metal jacket 19 has two half portions that extend longitudinally along the pipeline. Each jacket half portion has seam means in the form of flanges 21 that extend radially outward. When the jacket half portions are assembled onto the pipeline, the respective flanges 21 abut one ano~her to form seams.
The half portions are retained in place on a pipeline by securing the respective flanges together with suitable means.
Ln Fig. 3, the pipe wall 15 is shown to have a corrosion pit 23 adjacent to the insulation. The corrosio~ acts to reduce the thickness of the pipe wall, wherein it forms the pit and fills the pit with corrosion products. The corrosion that has pitted the pipe wall is caused by water that has entered the insulation between the jacket flanges 21.
Detecting apparatus 25 is provided near that portion of the pipe wall which is to be tested for corrosion and includes antenna means 27, a transmitter 29, a receiver and amplifier 31, and a digital computer 33.
The antenna means 27 include a transmitting antenna coil 35, a receiving antenna coil 37 and core means 39. In the preferred Pmbodiment, the transmitting and receiving antenna coils 35, 37 are wound onto the same core means 39, an arrangement which is hereinafter referred to as coincident . ~ , , .
,, , (see Fig. 3). The core means 39, which is in the shape of a spool, is made of a non-magnetic and non-conductive material such as plastic. The number of turns o~ the transmitting antenna coil are kept to a minimum to minimize the inductance of the transmitting antenna and to provide for an abrupt switching off of the transmitting antenna coil. In the preferred embodiment, the transmitting antenna coil 35 is made up of 120 turns of 20 to 24 gauge wire. The receiving antenna coil 37 is made up of 400 turns of 34 to 40 gauge wire. The transmitting and receiving antenna coils 35, 37 are connected to the transmitter 29 and receiver 31 by respective pairs of wires 41, 43.
The transmitter 29 which is conventional, generates a train of pulses having magnitudes of 1 to 5 amps. As discussed in more detail below, a plurality of pulses are transmitted for each location of the antenna means 27 for data enhancement purposes. The pulses have abrupt fall times on the order of 10 to 100 microseconds. The pulses of the transmitter pulse train alternate polarity to eliminate dc bias in the instrumentation. The duration of each pulse is sufficiently long to stabilize the pulse magnitude so that there are no induced currents in the pipe wall before the end of the pulse. The transmitter 29 repeats the pulses at a repetition rate that allows all of the necessary data to be obtained or each pulse. For example, a thick pipe wall requires more time to obtain data than does a thinner pipe wall because the induced current takes longer to diffuse in the thick pipe wall. Thus, tha repetition rate of pulses will typically be slower for thick pipe walls than for thinner pipe walls.
The receiver and amplifier 31 is a broad band instrument with a wide (5 or 6 orders of magnitude) dynamic range. The receiver 31, which has an A/D converter, samples the signal at a constant rate and integrates the signal over a time window or channel. The duration of the time windows increases .:'"'' .
: ~ :
. ..
:
with time. The transmitter 29 and the receiver and amplifier 31 are conventional. In practice it has been found that the SIROT~M transmitter, receiver and amplifier unit manu-factured by Geoex Pty. Ltd. of Adelaide, Australia, works well. The battery operated SIROTEM unit is portable, a characteristic which allows ease of use when surveying pipelines in the field.
The digital computer 33 is a conventional portable computer with sufficient memory capacity to record the data.
The method of detecting corrosion on a conductive container of the present invention will now be described.
As mentioned earlier, the method of the present invention utilizes transient electromagnetic probing (T~i~P). TEMP
allows the remote probing of a conductor by inducin~ a current into the conductor and then analyzing the decay of the current.
First, the antenna means 27 is placed on the jacket 19 so as to be in proximity with the near surface 45 of the portion of the pipeline 11 that is to be investigated.
Suitable means (not shown) are used to secure the antenna means 27 in position so as to minimize any motion of the antenna means over the investigated pipe wall portion. The transmitting antenna coil 35 is then energize~ by the transmitter 29 with a pulse. As described above, the transmitting antenna coil 35 is energized for a sufficient period of time to stabilize tlle pulse ma~nitude, therebY
insuring no eddy currents are induced into the pipeline 11.
Then, the transmitting coil 35 is abruptly de-energized by the transmitter by having the pulse fall off rapidly to zero magnitude. This abrupt de-energi~.ation of the transmitting antenna coil 35 induces eddy currents into the conductors located near the coil; namely the jacket 19 and the pipe wall 15. The eddy currents, which decay and diffuse away from the antenna means 27 inside of the respective conductors, create a magnetic field that is detected as a time-varying voltage in the receiving antenna coil 37. As soon as the -transmitting antenna coil is de-energized, the receiver 31 is then switched on. The receiving antenna coil 37 detects the presence of and the decay of the induced eddy currents in the conductors. The eddy currents are gradually dissi-pated within the conductors by resistive heat losses. Therate of diffusion is dependent on the conductivity and thickness of the conductor. The receiver 31 samples the signal as detected by the receiving antenna coil 37, where-upon it is amplified to a suitable level and sent to the digital computer 33 for storage and processing. The receiver 31 measures the signal from the time the eddy currents are first induced into the conductors until the signal becomes indistinguishable from noise. The level of noise is reduced by minimizing any motion of the receiving antenna coil 37 relative to the conductors. The received signal is unpro-cessed data and forms a record in the computer 33 of the decay of the induced currents in the conductors. The transmitting and receiving procedure is repeated many times with the antenna means 27 in the same location to increase the signal-to-noise ratio.
The data is then processed by computer data processing means into a suitable format for interpretation. The first steps in the processing of the data involve the normalization of the received signals and the summing and averaging of the received signals. Because the transmitter 29 in the preferred embodiment is battery operated, the magnitude of the trans-mitter current is subject to variation. The effects of variation in magnitude in the data are removed by normalizing the received voltage to the transmitted current. The summing and averaging of the received signals for a particular antenna means location serves to increase the signal-to-noise ratio. In particularly noisy environments, as an alternative to summing and averaging, selective stacking can ~e used to eliminate noisy transients. The result of this initial data processing is a time-varying response curve , ..
~::
~2'~
such as shown in Fig. 4. (Fig 4 illustrates response curves for various conductors.) The response curves may be interpreted in accordance with methods which will now be described, with reference to Figs. ~-8d. Referring in particular to Fig. 4, the presence or absence of corrosion on a conductor wall is inferred by ex~mining the shape of the various response curves which have been taken over the area of interest. The shape of each response curve depends in part on the thickness of the conductor wall. For example, the magnitude of the response curve of an infinitely thick conductor wall decays at a fairly even rate (on a log-log ~raph), resulting in a fairly straight response curve, whereas the response curve of a conductor having a finite wall thickness begins to break at some point into a more pronounced downward direction than before and decays at a faster rate. This breaking pheno-menon is attributed to the induced currents diffusing to and reaching the far surface 47 of the conductor wall. Response curves for thin conductor walls break at earlier times than do response curves for thicker conductor walls.
Because corrosion reduces the thickness of a conductor wall, the presence or absence of corrosion can be inferred by comparing the shape of the response curve for the inves-tigated pipe wall portion to the shape of the response curve for an uncorroded portion of the same type of pipe. For example, in Fig. 4, the two response curves labeled "corrosion"
and "no corrosion" are taken from the same pipe. The "no corrosion" response curve is taken from an uncorroded portion of the pipe and is used as a reference, while the "corrosion"
response curve is taken from a different portion of the same pipe, which different portion has a pit to simulate corrosion (with the antenna means located at the same distance from the pipe wall, for both response curves). At about 17 ms (milliseconds), the "corrosion" response curve breaks into a more pronounced downward direction and begins to decay at a faster rate than before. The "corrosion" break point occurs at an earlier time than does the "no corrosion" break point `~
~'7~
(at about 25 ms), indlcating that the conductor wall rep-resented by the "corrosion" response cu:rve is thinner than the conductor wall represented by the "no corrosion" response curve.
Referring now to Fig. 5, the "corrosion" and "no corrosion" response curves of Fig. 4 are compared by plotting the ratio of the two curves as a percent response curve, using the "no corrosion" response curve as a reference. The percent response curve highlights the differences between the "corrosion" and the "no corrosion" response curves. By examining the late time portions of the percent response curve (from about 17-20 ms on, which is about when the "corrosion"
response curve of Fig. 4 begins to break sharply downward), one can see that the "corrosion" response curve deviates 20 to 30 percent from the "no corrosion" response curve. This 20 to 30 percent difference clearly indicates a difference in wall thickness between the corroded portion of the pipe and the uncorroded portion of the pipe.
In Fig. 4, the response curve labeled "jacket only" is that taken from the metal jacket 19, without the pipe 13. The "jacket only" response curve decays very rapidly so that by the relatively late time of 20 ms, the jacket 19 contributes very little to the total response. This is because the wall thickness of the jacket is much smaller than is the thickness of the pipe wall, so the currents diffuse much more rapidly in the jacket. Thus, for those portions of the "jacket and pipe" response curves that are o~ interest in locating corrosion (that is the later times), the effect of the jacket can be ignored.
Responses measured near jacket flanges are affected quite strongly by the jacket flanges at all times, as shown in Fig. 7. A response measured near jacket flanges can be corrected to remove the effects of the jacket flanges by normalizing the affected response curve to a reerence response curve obtained away from the jacket flanges. As shown in Fig. 7, an effect of the jacket flanges on the response curve is a generally parallel shift in a downward .,.. :
.
. . .
..
~ ~ ~x ~
~ ~ ~a direction in the intermediate and late time ranges (later than about 4 ms). That is to say that in the intermediate and late time ranges, the affected response curve is generally parallel to the reference response curves. The affected response curve is corrected by normali7ing the affected response curve to the reference response curve in the intermediate time range.
Fig. 7 also serves to illustrate the effect that variations in distance between the antenna means and the pipe wall at one location on the pipe and between the antenna means and the pipe wall at another location on the pipe can have on responses. Such variations in distance result from non-uniform thicknesses of the insulation between the pipe wall and the jacket. Increasing the distance of the antenna means from the pipe wall causes the magnitude of the response to decrease at intermediate and late times, which decrease in magnitude shows up as a generally parallel shift. The responses can be corrected to remove the effects of varia-tions in distance by normalizing the response curves to a reference response curve obtained with the antenna means at some known distance, in the intermediate time range.
The antenna means 27 gives a reading of the average conductor wall thickness over a search area. The size of the search area depends upon antenna size, antenna config-uration and the duration of the receiver measuring time after each transmitter pulse. The search area of the antenna means increases with larger antenna sizes or with longer measuring times. In the preferred embodiment, the antenna means 27 has a diameter of about 3 inches. For a 10.5 inch pipe, the search area is about 12 inches in diameter.
In the usual case, the portion of the pipeline that is to be investigated for corrosion is much larger than the search area of the antenna means. Therefore, a typical pipe survey requires the antenna means to be moved to new .;
~.
. .
~LX7~:~6~
locations to complete the survey. In Figs. 8a through 8dthere are shown a corrosion map of a pipe section and corresponding T~MP surveys or profiles along line A-A of the pipe section. In obtaining the T~MP profiles of Figs. 8b through 8d, the antenna means was positioned at various locations along line A-A. In Fig. 8a, the numbers along line 8a indicate ultrasonic point measurements of the wall thickness (in inches) and the shaded areas indicate heavy corrosion, wherein the thickness of the pipe wall is less than for the unshaded areas. The map shows that the pipe wall along line A-A is thickest around 180 and gets thinner moving towards 0 and 360.
Fig. 8b shows TEMP profiles of the pipe of Fig. 8a along line A-A, without a metal jacket. In Fig. 8b only those values of the response curve at selected discrete instances of time for each antenna means location are plotted.
The response curve values at equivalent instances of time are then connected together to form a TEMP profile. Thus, for each antenna means location, the response curve values at time=8.5 ms, 32.8 ms, 67 ms, 79 ms, 92 ms, and 105 ms are plot~ed, forming respective T~MP profiles of pipe wall thickness. Each TEMP profile is normalized to the T~MP
response obtained over the thickest portion of the pipe. As can be seen in Fig. 8b, the TEMP profiles show that in moving away from 180 in either direction (towards 0 and towards 360) the pipe wall thickness lessens and is thinnest around 0 to 60 and 320 to 360. The late time TEMP profiles (67 ms and greater) in particular clearly show the reduced wall thickness, corresponding with the pipe corrosion map of Fig. 8a.
In Fig. 8c, there are shown TEMP profiles of the pipe of Fig. 8a along line A-A, but with a metal jacket. The TEMP profiles of Fig. 8c were obtained in the same manner as the TEMP profiles of Fig. 8b. The jacket flanges, which are '"~ .;
located at approximately 95 and 270, have caused reductions in the amplitudes of the TEMP profile portions near the flanges. The T~MP profiles of Fig. 8c have been corrected to reduce the effects of the jacket flanges by normalizing the responses measured near the jacket flanges to a response measured away from the jacket flanges. The responses are normalized in the in~ermediate time range (3-6 ms) and the late times (32 ms and greater) are then analyzed. (In Fig. 8d there are shown the TEMP profiles of Fig. 8c before the profiles have been corrected for the effects of the jacket flanges.) There is a good correlation between the T~MP
profiles of Fig. 8c and the corrosion map of Fig. 8a. The TEMP profiles of Fig. 8c show that the pipe wall is reduced in thickness around 0 to 60 and 320 to 360, thus leading to an inference of corrosion at those locations.
Figs. 8a through 8d illustrate an advan~ageous dif-ference of the T~MP method over the ultrasonic method. The ultrasonic method makes point measurements, requiring a large number of measurements, whereas the antenna means of the TEMP method has a large search area requiring fewer measurements. While the ultrasonic measurements in Fig. 8a are essentially confined to line A-A, the TEMP measurements encompass portions of the pipe extending for a few inches to either side of line A-A. Furthermore, ultrasonic measurements must be made on the bare pipe, while TEMP measurements can be made on the jacket.
For TEMP profiles such as are shown in Figs. 8b-8d, the effects on the responses due to the variations in distance between the antenna means and the pipe wall, which variations are caused by moving the antenna means from one location on the pipe to another location, can be corrected for by creating reference response curves with the antenna means placed at a number of known distances from the pipe wall. The inter-mediate times of the response curves having distance error are then normalized to the intermediate times of the respective reference response curves.
In Fig. 6, there is shown a TEMP pro~ile of the corrosion pit of Fig. 5. The TEMP profile is obtained by moving the antenna means to a plurality of locations and averaging the responses for the 25 to 52 ms time window at each antenna means location. The physical extent of the corrosion pit is indicated at the bottom le~t corner of the graph, which shows the pit to have a radius of about 8 inches. The T~MP
profile of Fig. 6 shows a good correlation to the physical profile. From about 17 inches on, the ThMP profile shows a slight decrease in magnitude due to the induced currents interacting with the nearby pipe end.
Another method of interpretation of the response curves of Fig. 4 involves examining the time at which the far surface 47 of the pipe wall is initially manifested in the response curve~ This time is referred to as the "critical time", and is that point where the response curve begins to break into a more pronounced downward direction than before, as discussed hereinbefore (see Fig. 4). The wall thickness of the pipe is proportional to the square root of the critical time. The constant or factor of proportionality is dependent on the geometry and the conductivity of the pipe, and may be determined by making a determination of the critical time of a particular thickness of the pipe.
The method of the present invention can be used to make quantitative measurements of wall thickness, once the instruments and data have been calibrated on pipes of known thickness and conductivity. Once the actual wall thickness of the investigated pipe is known, comparison to the manu-factured wall thickness leads to a determination of wall loss due to corrosion on -the investigated pipe.
PART ~
Another method for correcting error in the responses due to variations in distance between the antenna means and the pipe wall from one location along the pipe to another location will now be described, with reference to Figs. 9 and 10.
.. . .
. . .
- :
... .
., . ~ . .-. ~. :,:,;,.. . ..
:"- '' .
.~ ~
In Fig. 9 there are shown a plurality of TEMP response curves (plotted as discrete values instead of as continuous values) that have been corrected for effects due to variations in distance between the antenna means and the pipe walls.
Fig. 9 illustrates the corrected response curves for a forty-two inch diameter pipe (with a pipe wall thickness of 0.438 inches), a twelvP~inch diameter pipe (with a pipe wall thickness of 0.406 inches), and a thirty-inch diameter pipe (with a pipe wall thickness of 0.3~4 inches).
For each pipe, numerous TEMP surveys were taken at different locations along the pipe. The TEMP surveys were obtained through lnsulation 17 and a metal jacket 19. The thickness of the insulation along each pipe varied as much as fifty percent, thus causing the distance between the antenna means and the pipe walls to vary by the same amount.
The record of the decay of induced current in a pipe wall (as shown by the respective designated response curves of Fig. 4) is corrected for the variations in distance by determining with respect to time the rate of decay of the induced current. Correcting for variations in distance by determining the rate of decay of induced current recognizes the phenomenon that variation in distance between the antenna means and the pipe wall affects the magnitude of the response, but does not affect the rate of decay of the response. In Fig. 9, the corrected response curves shown illustrate the respective rates of decay of uncorrected TEMP survey responses obtained from the pipes. The rates of decay were obtained by taking the logarithmic derivative (d(ln V)/d(ln t);
where V is the received voltage and t is time) of the uncorrected TEMP survey responses. (Central difference numerical methods were used to obtain the graphs of Figs. 9 and 10.) As can be seen, in spite of the variations in insulation thickness, the vertical scatter among the corrected TEMP surveys for each pipe is small, and is in fact due to variations in pipe wall thickness. Thus, by determining the rates of decay of the responses J the effects .:
of variation in distance between the antenna means and the pipe wall have been correc-ted for. The presence or absence of corrosion in the pipe wall is inferred by the interpretation methods discussed hereinabove.
The rate of decay correction method also allows the quantitative determination of wall thickness. As the induced currents diffuse through the conductor walls from the near surface 45 (see Fig. 3), the responses decay at a constant logarithmic rate of about -1.5. Then, as the induced currents begin to interact with the far surface 47 of the conductor wall, the responses decay at increasing rates.
The time of departure of a response decay rate from the constant logarithmic rate of about -1.5 is a function of the pipe wall thickness and the pipe diameter. The corrected responses of thinner pipe walls break downwardly at an earlier time than do the corrected responses of thicker pipe walls. Increases in pipe diameter cause the responses to break downwardly at later times. After the induced current reaches the far surface of the pipe wall, the rate of decay of the response approaches asymptotically a constant second derivative. This asymptotic portion of the rate of decay of the response is independent of the thickness of the pipe wall or the pipe diameter and has been determined empirically to be:
d(ln V)/d(ln t) ~ A-2.17 ln t;
where A is a function of pipe wall thickness, pipe diameter, and pipe metallurgy. The asymptotic characterisic of the rate of decay Gf the response, coupled with the time of departure of a response decay rate being dependent upon the pipe wall thickness allows the construction of nomograms that can be superimposed on the corrected response curves.
The nomograms are constructed from numerous reference records which are created by inducing current into pipe walls of known thickness and substantially similar diameters.
In Fig. 10, there is shown a nomogram consisting of straight ,., ~ , :.
., "': '~' .
~'7X ~ 6 lines suyerimposed on corrected response curves (T~MP surveys A, B, and C) obtained from various locations along a corroded eight-inch diameter pipe. Thus, it can be seen by extra-polatory comparisons between the individual T~MP surveys and the nomogram that the pipe wall portion that was probed with TEMP survey A had a thickness of about 0.46 inches, the portion that was probed with T~P survey B had a thickness of about 0.43 inches, and the portion that was probed with TEMP survey C had a thickness of about 0.~1 inches. From these quantitative pipe wall thiickness measurements, the presence or absence of corrosion on the pipe wall can be inferred.
~ART C
A method of directly detecting corrosion on pipe walls will now be described with reference to ~igs. 11-14.
Such a method is particularly useful for detecting corrosion on the walls of extruded pipe. Due to the extrusion process used during manufacturing, the pipe wall thickness of extruded pipe varies over relatively large tolerances, and cannot always be used to directly infer the presence of corrosion.
The method of directly detecting corrosion utilizes my discovery that the corrosion scale or products on steel pipes exhibits superparamagnetic properties. Superpara-magnetism, or viscous magnetization as it is also known, is a property wherein the magnetic susceptibility of a material is effectively time-dependent. Most materials are not superparamagnetic; the magnetic flux density B reacts almost instantaneously to changes in the applied magnetic field H. ~owever, in superparamagnetic materials, the magnetic flux density B reacts somewhat sluggishly to changes in the magnetic field. Superparamagnetism has been observed in magnetite, maghemite and hematite. Analysis of corrosion scale taken from NGI gas pipelines reveal that the scale is predominantly composed of magnetite and hematite, with some -~, ~ ~2 ~ 65 maghemite and manganese dioxide, and exhibits T~MP behavior indicative of superparamagnetism.
The detection of corrosion scale having superpara-magnetic properties begins with the utilization of the TEMP
metho~s described hereinabove. In Figs. 11 and 12 there are shown respective TEMP response curves for a pipe and a bag of corrosion products. The response curves for the pipe behaves as described hereinabove. The response curve for the corrosion products dec:ays at a constant rate described as a l/t time relationshlp (a slope of -1 on a log log scale).
The constant (l/t) rate of decay of the response curve for the corrosion products results from the superparamagnetic property of the corrosion products. At relatively early and intermediate times, the magnitude of the response curve of the corrosion products is much smaller than the magnitude of the response curve of the pipe. At relatively late times, the response curve of the pipe decays at a much faster rate than does the response curve of the corrosion products`, causing the magnitude of the pipe response curve to first approach the corrosion products response curve in magnitude and then to diminish in magnitude relative to the corrosion products response curve. Thus, for a corroded portion of pipe, the TEMP response of the pipe portion has a response component due to the pipe wall and a response component due to the corrosion, with the pipe wall component overwhelmingly predominating at relatively early and intermediate times and the corrosion component detectable at relatively late times.
Figs. 13 and 14 illu~trate an application of the method of the present invention, in accordance with a preferred embodiment. Figs. 13 and 14 show respective TEMP response curves obtained from a 10.5 inch diameter NGI pipe. The "corrosion" response curve was ob~ained with the antenna means placed over a patch of corrosion scale on the pipe with an approximate thickness of 1/8 inch (corresponding to a wall thickness loss of about three percent). The "no corrosion" response curve was obtained with the antenna means placed over an uncorrod~d portion of the pipe. Fig.
-' ;~,, : , : .-,.. -..
' :" - '' ' ~
,~ ~"' ' 1~, in particular, shows the difference between the two response curves. In Fig. 1~, the response curves of Fig.
13 were processed to enhance the corros:Lon component or lack thereof by determining the respective rates of decay.
At relatively late times (from about 80 ms on) the "corrosion"
response curve has a decrease in the magnitude o~ the rate of decay, shown as an upward inc:lination o~ the "corrosion"
response curve, whereas the "no corrosion" response curve continues to decay at an increasing rate. This slowing of the decay rate of the "corrosion" response curve at relatively late times is caused by the corrosion scale component of the response curve which becomes detectable in the overall response of the corroded portion of pipe. At relatively late times, the magnitude of the pipe wall component of the "corrosion" response curve first approaches the magnitude of the corrosion scale component and then diminishes relative to the corrosion scale component since the pipe wall component magnitude decreases at an increasing rate of decay. If the TEMP system signal-to-noise ratio is sufficiently large, the TE~P response of the pipe can be detected ~or a sufficient length of time so that the corrosion scale component pre-dominates over the pipe wall component.
The above described method can be used on insulated and uninsulated pipes or containers.
An important aspect of the method of the present invention is that corrosion on a container means wall can be directly detected, regardless of variations in the thickness of the container means wall. The method utilizes my discovery that corrosion scale on steel pipes has superparamagnetic properties.
Although the method of the present invention has been described for use in detecting corrosion on pipelines, the method may also be used to detect corrosion on the electri-cally cond~lctive walls of other types of container means such as storage vessels and pressure vessels. In addition, the method of the present invention can be used on uninsulated as well as insulated container means.
~ ~ .
"
. .
S
'~he antenna means can have the transmitting antenna and receiving antenna configured in arrangements other than the coincident arrangement described herein. One such arrangement has the transmitting antenna separate but coplanar with the receiving antenna. Another arrangement has a plurality of receiving antennas located ~ithin a large transmitting antenna loop.
Although this invention has been described with a certain degree of particularity, it is understood that the present disclosure is made only by way of e~ample and that numerous changes in the details of construction and the combination and arrangement of parts may be resorted to without departing from the spirit and the scope of the invention, reference being had for the latter purpose to the appended claims.
- ,, .
Claims (14)
PROPERTY OR PRIVILEGE IS CLAIMED ARE DEFINED AS FOLLOWS:
1. A method of detecting corrosion on walls of container means, said walls being electrically conductive and having near surfaces and far surfaces, comprising the steps of:
a. placing transmitting antenna means and receiving antenna means in proximity with the near surface of that portion of the container means wall which is to be investigated for corrosion;
b. energizing the transmitting antenna means with current;
c. abruptly de-energizing the transmitting antenna means so as to induce current into the container means wall portion;
d. detecting the presence of and the decay of said induced current in said container means wall portion with the receiving antenna means;
e. creating a record of the decay of said induced current in said container means wall portion over a period of time;
f. determining the presence or absence of a corrosion component in said record of the decay of said induced current, said corrosion component due to the presence of corrosion products having superparamagnetic properties, the presence of a corrosion component being indicated if at relatively late times of the decay the rate of decay of the induced current decreases relative to the rate of decay of a reference record, said reference record being obtained from an uncorroded container means wall portion, wherein the presence of a corrosion component in said record indicates the presence of corrosion on said container means wall portion.
a. placing transmitting antenna means and receiving antenna means in proximity with the near surface of that portion of the container means wall which is to be investigated for corrosion;
b. energizing the transmitting antenna means with current;
c. abruptly de-energizing the transmitting antenna means so as to induce current into the container means wall portion;
d. detecting the presence of and the decay of said induced current in said container means wall portion with the receiving antenna means;
e. creating a record of the decay of said induced current in said container means wall portion over a period of time;
f. determining the presence or absence of a corrosion component in said record of the decay of said induced current, said corrosion component due to the presence of corrosion products having superparamagnetic properties, the presence of a corrosion component being indicated if at relatively late times of the decay the rate of decay of the induced current decreases relative to the rate of decay of a reference record, said reference record being obtained from an uncorroded container means wall portion, wherein the presence of a corrosion component in said record indicates the presence of corrosion on said container means wall portion.
2. The method of claim 1 further comprising the step of determining from said record a derivative with respect to time of the decay of said induced current, and comparing the derivative of said induced current at relatively late times to a derivative of said reference record at relatively late times to determine if a corrosion component is present in said record, wherein a corrosion component is present if the derivative of said induced current is smaller than the derivative of said reference record.
3. A method of detecting corrosion on electrically conductive walls of container means, comprising the steps of:
a. providing transmitting antenna means, receiving antenna means, transmitter means connected with said transmitting antenna means, and receiver means connected with said receiving antenna means;
b. placing said transmitting antenna means and said receiving antenna means in proximity to that portion of the container means wall which is to be investigated for corrosion;
c. providing an abruptly changing current to said transmitting antenna means from said transmitter means so as to induce current into the investigated container means wall portion;
d. detecting said induced current in said investigated container means wall portion with said receiving antenna means and said receiver means to produce a received signal, said received signal decaying into noise over a period of time, said received signal having a late time range;
e. examining said received signal late time range to determine if a corrosion component is present in said received signal, said corrosion component being due to the presence of corrosion products on said investigated container means wall portion which corrosion products have superparamagnetic properties, the presence of said corrosion component being indicated if the rate of decay of said received signal decreases at late times, wherein if said corrosion component is present in said received signal then said container means wall portion is corroded.
a. providing transmitting antenna means, receiving antenna means, transmitter means connected with said transmitting antenna means, and receiver means connected with said receiving antenna means;
b. placing said transmitting antenna means and said receiving antenna means in proximity to that portion of the container means wall which is to be investigated for corrosion;
c. providing an abruptly changing current to said transmitting antenna means from said transmitter means so as to induce current into the investigated container means wall portion;
d. detecting said induced current in said investigated container means wall portion with said receiving antenna means and said receiver means to produce a received signal, said received signal decaying into noise over a period of time, said received signal having a late time range;
e. examining said received signal late time range to determine if a corrosion component is present in said received signal, said corrosion component being due to the presence of corrosion products on said investigated container means wall portion which corrosion products have superparamagnetic properties, the presence of said corrosion component being indicated if the rate of decay of said received signal decreases at late times, wherein if said corrosion component is present in said received signal then said container means wall portion is corroded.
4. The method of claim 3 further comprising the step of determining the rate of decay of said received signal by determining a derivative with respect to time of the decay of the induced current.
5. The method of claim 3 wherein said container means wall is provided with a layer of insulation, said insulation being located adjacent to said container means wall so as to be interposed between said container means wall portion and said transmitting antenna means and said receiving antenna means, wherein said transmitting antenna means induces current: into the investigated container means wall portion through said insulation and said receiving antenna means detects said induced current through said insulation.
6. The method of claim 3 wherein said container means wall is provided with a layer of insulation and a conductive jacket, said insulation and said jacket being located adjacent to said container means wall such that said insulation is interposed between said container means wall and said jacket, said jacket being interposed between said insulation and said transmitting antenna means and said receiving antenna means, wherein said transmitting antenna means induces current into the container means wall portion through said insulation and said jacket and said receiving antenna means detects said induced current through said insulation and said jacket.
7. The method of claim 6 further comprising the step of determining the rate of decay of said received signal by determining a derivative with respect to time of the decay of the induced current.
8. A method of detecting corrosion on electrically conductive walls of container means, comprising the steps of:
a. providing transmitting antenna means, receiving antenna means, transmitter means connected with said transmitting antenna means, and receiver means connected with said receiving antenna means;
b. placing said transmitting antenna means and said re-ceiving antenna means in proximity to that portion of the con-tainer means wall which is to be investigated for corrosion;
c. providing an abruptly changing current to said trans-mitting antenna means from said transmitter means so as to induce current into the investigated container means wall portion;
d. detecting said induced current in said investigated container means wall portion with said receiving antenna means and said receiver means to produce a received signal, said re-ceived signal decaying into noise over a period of time, said re-ceived signal having a late time range;
e. examining said received signal late time range to determine if a corrosion component is present in said received signal, said corrosion component being due to the presence of corrosion products on said investigated container means wall por-tion which corrosion products have superparamagnetic properties, the presence of said corrosion component being indicated if the rate of decay of said received signal decreases relative to the rate of decay of a reference signal, said reference signal being obtained from an uncorroded container means wall portion.
a. providing transmitting antenna means, receiving antenna means, transmitter means connected with said transmitting antenna means, and receiver means connected with said receiving antenna means;
b. placing said transmitting antenna means and said re-ceiving antenna means in proximity to that portion of the con-tainer means wall which is to be investigated for corrosion;
c. providing an abruptly changing current to said trans-mitting antenna means from said transmitter means so as to induce current into the investigated container means wall portion;
d. detecting said induced current in said investigated container means wall portion with said receiving antenna means and said receiver means to produce a received signal, said re-ceived signal decaying into noise over a period of time, said re-ceived signal having a late time range;
e. examining said received signal late time range to determine if a corrosion component is present in said received signal, said corrosion component being due to the presence of corrosion products on said investigated container means wall por-tion which corrosion products have superparamagnetic properties, the presence of said corrosion component being indicated if the rate of decay of said received signal decreases relative to the rate of decay of a reference signal, said reference signal being obtained from an uncorroded container means wall portion.
9. The method of claim 8 wherein said container means wall is provided with a layer of insulation, said insulation being located adjacent to said container means wall so as to be interposed between said container means wall portion and said transmitting antenna means and said receiving antenna means, wherein said transmitting antenna means induces current into the investigated container means wall portion through said insulation and said receiving antenna means detects said induced current through said insulation.
10. The method of claim 9 wherein said container means comprises extruded pipe.
11. The method of claim 8 wherein said container means wall is provided with a layer of insulation and a conductive jacket, said insulation and said jacket being located adjacent to said container means wall such that said insulation is interposed between said container means wall and said jacket, said jacket being interposed between said insulation and said transmitting antenna means and said receiving antenna means, wherein said transmitting antenna means induces current into the container means wall portion through said insulation and said jacket and said receiving antenna means detects said induced current through said insulation and said jacket.
12. The method of claim 11 wherein said container means comprises extruded pipe.
13. The method of claim 8 wherein said container means comprises extruded pipe.
14. A method of detecting corrosion products on container means, said corrosion products comprising magnetite, hematite, or maghemite, comprising the steps of:
a. providing transmitting antenna means, receiving antenna means, transmitter means connected with said transmitting antenna means, and receiver means connected with said receiving antenna means;
b. placing said transmitting antenna means and said re-ceiving antenna means in proximity to that portion of the con-tainer means which is to be investigated for corrosion;
c. providing an abruptly changing current to said trans-mitting antenna means from said transmitter means so as to induce current into the investigated container means wall portion;
d. detecting said induced current in said investigated container means wall portion with said receiving antenna means and said receiver means to produce a received signal, said re-ceived signal decaying into noise over a period of time, said re-ceived signal having late time ranges;
e. examining said received signal late time range to de-termine if said corrosion products are present on said investi-gated container means portion, said corrosion products exhibiting superparamagnetic behavior, the presence of said corrosion pro-ducts on said investigated container means portion being indica-ted by determining if the rate of decay of the received signal decreases relative to the rate of decay of a reference signal, said reference signal being obtained from an uncorroded container means wall portion.
a. providing transmitting antenna means, receiving antenna means, transmitter means connected with said transmitting antenna means, and receiver means connected with said receiving antenna means;
b. placing said transmitting antenna means and said re-ceiving antenna means in proximity to that portion of the con-tainer means which is to be investigated for corrosion;
c. providing an abruptly changing current to said trans-mitting antenna means from said transmitter means so as to induce current into the investigated container means wall portion;
d. detecting said induced current in said investigated container means wall portion with said receiving antenna means and said receiver means to produce a received signal, said re-ceived signal decaying into noise over a period of time, said re-ceived signal having late time ranges;
e. examining said received signal late time range to de-termine if said corrosion products are present on said investi-gated container means portion, said corrosion products exhibiting superparamagnetic behavior, the presence of said corrosion pro-ducts on said investigated container means portion being indica-ted by determining if the rate of decay of the received signal decreases relative to the rate of decay of a reference signal, said reference signal being obtained from an uncorroded container means wall portion.
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| US07/133,952 | 1987-12-17 | ||
| US07/133,952 US4839593A (en) | 1987-12-17 | 1987-12-17 | Transient electromagnetic method for directly detecting corrosion on conductive containers |
Publications (1)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| CA1272265A true CA1272265A (en) | 1990-07-31 |
Family
ID=22461064
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| CA000584161A Expired - Fee Related CA1272265A (en) | 1987-12-17 | 1988-11-25 | Method for directly detecting corrosion on conductive containers |
Country Status (7)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| US (1) | US4839593A (en) |
| EP (1) | EP0321110B1 (en) |
| JP (1) | JPH01202653A (en) |
| AU (1) | AU598705B2 (en) |
| CA (1) | CA1272265A (en) |
| DE (1) | DE3882214T2 (en) |
| NO (1) | NO304453B1 (en) |
Families Citing this family (36)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US5030911A (en) * | 1980-10-19 | 1991-07-09 | Baker Hughes Incorporated | Method and apparatus for displaying defects in tubular members on a two-dimensional map in a variety of display modes |
| US4990851A (en) * | 1987-12-17 | 1991-02-05 | Atlantic Richfield Company | Transient electromagnetic method for detecting irregularities on conductive containers |
| US4929898A (en) * | 1987-12-17 | 1990-05-29 | Atlantic Richfield | Transient electromagnetic method for detecting irregularities on conductive containers |
| CA2005551C (en) * | 1988-12-29 | 1999-08-31 | Pedro F. Lara | Transient electromagnetic method for detecting irregularities on conductive containers having variations in jacket thickness |
| US4929896A (en) * | 1988-12-29 | 1990-05-29 | Atlantic Richfield Company | Transient electromagnetic method for detecting irregularies on conductive containers having variations in jacket thickness |
| US5190635A (en) * | 1989-04-03 | 1993-03-02 | Ashland Oil, Inc. | Superparamagnetic formation of FCC catalyst provides means of separation of old equilibrium fluid cracking catalyst |
| US5233297A (en) * | 1990-08-06 | 1993-08-03 | Atlantic Richfield Company | Transient electromagnetic method and apparatus for inspecting conductive objects utilizing sensors that move during inspection |
| US5198098A (en) * | 1990-10-19 | 1993-03-30 | Ashland Oil, Inc. | Magnetic separation of old from new equilibrium particles by means of manganese addition |
| US5171424A (en) * | 1990-10-22 | 1992-12-15 | Ashland Oil, Inc. | Magnetic separation of old from new cracking catalyst by means of heavy rare earth "magnetic hooks" |
| EP0518635B1 (en) * | 1991-06-11 | 2003-05-21 | Newt Holdings Limited | Probe |
| US5461313A (en) * | 1993-06-21 | 1995-10-24 | Atlantic Richfield Company | Method of detecting cracks by measuring eddy current decay rate |
| US5670878A (en) * | 1993-06-21 | 1997-09-23 | Atlantic Richfield Company | Inspecting a conductive object with a steady state magnetic field and induced eddy current |
| EP0817974B1 (en) | 1995-03-14 | 2000-11-08 | Profile Technologies, Inc. | Reflectometry methods for insulated pipes |
| EP0885396A4 (en) | 1996-02-27 | 2007-09-26 | Profile Technologies Inc | Pipe testing apparatus and method |
| US6291992B1 (en) * | 1996-07-12 | 2001-09-18 | Shell Oil Company | Eddy current inspection technique |
| JPH10206390A (en) * | 1997-01-22 | 1998-08-07 | Kawasaki Steel Corp | Method for detecting damage of covering of buried steel pipe |
| US6820653B1 (en) | 1999-04-12 | 2004-11-23 | Carnegie Mellon University | Pipe inspection and repair system |
| US6583630B2 (en) * | 1999-11-18 | 2003-06-24 | Intellijoint Systems Ltd. | Systems and methods for monitoring wear and/or displacement of artificial joint members, vertebrae, segments of fractured bones and dental implants |
| US6707296B2 (en) * | 2000-08-24 | 2004-03-16 | Shell Oil Company | Method for detecting cracks in electrically conducting material |
| ATE301264T1 (en) * | 2001-03-07 | 2005-08-15 | Univ Carnegie Mellon | ROBOT SYSTEM FOR INSPECTING GAS PIPES |
| US6911828B1 (en) | 2001-05-23 | 2005-06-28 | Southwest Research Institute | Apparatus and method for detecting the degradation of a coating using embedded sensors |
| US20050007121A1 (en) * | 2003-05-06 | 2005-01-13 | Burnett Gale D. | Systems and methods for non-destructively testing conductive members employing electromagnetic back scattering |
| US7642790B2 (en) | 2003-05-06 | 2010-01-05 | Profile Technologies, Inc. | Systems and methods for testing conductive members employing electromagnetic back scattering |
| US7196529B2 (en) * | 2003-05-06 | 2007-03-27 | Profile Technologies, Inc. | Systems and methods for testing conductive members employing electromagnetic back scattering |
| JP4394415B2 (en) * | 2003-10-24 | 2010-01-06 | 非破壊検査株式会社 | Plate thickness relative comparison method and plate thickness relative comparison apparatus using electromagnetic pulses |
| US8147130B2 (en) * | 2008-04-18 | 2012-04-03 | General Electric Company | Heat flux measurement device for estimating fouling thickness |
| US8000936B2 (en) * | 2008-11-10 | 2011-08-16 | Saudi Arabian Oil Company | Data analysis system for determining coating conditions of a buried pipeline |
| AU2011313872B2 (en) * | 2010-10-14 | 2015-01-22 | Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. | Method for measuring remote field eddy current thickness in multiple tubular configuration |
| US8623197B1 (en) * | 2010-12-20 | 2014-01-07 | Western Digital (Fremont), Llc | Testing workpiece overcoat |
| US20150306624A1 (en) * | 2014-04-24 | 2015-10-29 | Progressive Products, Inc. | Coated pipe section and method of manufacture |
| KR101601204B1 (en) * | 2014-06-20 | 2016-03-09 | 한국원자력연구원 | Apparatus and method for thinning pulse detection using eddy current probes |
| US10073058B2 (en) | 2015-02-11 | 2018-09-11 | Structural Integrity Associates | Dynamic pulsed eddy current probe |
| US10895555B2 (en) | 2015-03-30 | 2021-01-19 | Structural Integrity Associates, Inc. | System for in-line inspection using a dynamic pulsed eddy current probe and method thereof |
| GB2556516A (en) | 2015-08-20 | 2018-05-30 | Halliburton Energy Services Inc | Inspection of wellbore conduits using a distributed sensor system |
| CN106198718B (en) * | 2016-06-30 | 2019-03-22 | 重庆交通大学 | Drag-line corrosion sites detection device and method based on metal magnetic memory |
| CN111678977A (en) * | 2020-05-07 | 2020-09-18 | 天津舜捷安科技有限公司 | Ferromagnetic material wall thickness defect scanning device and method |
Family Cites Families (13)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US3229197A (en) * | 1961-10-31 | 1966-01-11 | Jr Claus J Renken | Pulsed electromagnetic field system for nondestructive testing |
| DE1698481B1 (en) * | 1963-02-18 | 1969-09-04 | Claus Colani | Device for examining a relatively homogeneous medium, possibly with a certain electrical conductivity |
| US3315154A (en) * | 1965-01-18 | 1967-04-18 | United Gas Corp | Method and apparatus for determining the wall thickness of metallic elements utilizing a reciprocal permanent magnet assembly |
| US3314155A (en) * | 1965-08-02 | 1967-04-18 | Joseph G Lavallee | Micrometer |
| US3532969A (en) * | 1968-02-20 | 1970-10-06 | Nat Lead Co | Method for magnetically measuring wall thickness of metal pipes and plate structures |
| US3745452A (en) * | 1971-02-23 | 1973-07-10 | J Osburn | Magnetic field gradient apparatus and method for detecting pipe line corrosion |
| US3707672A (en) * | 1971-06-02 | 1972-12-26 | Westinghouse Electric Corp | Weapon detector utilizing the pulsed field technique to detect weapons on the basis of weapons thickness |
| US4095180A (en) * | 1975-12-29 | 1978-06-13 | K. J. Law Engineers, Inc. | Method and apparatus for testing conductivity using eddy currents |
| US4194149A (en) * | 1977-12-15 | 1980-03-18 | The Babcock & Wilcox Company | Method for generating the eddy current signature of a flaw in a tube proximate a contiguous member which obscures the flaw signal |
| US4271393A (en) * | 1978-12-29 | 1981-06-02 | The Boeing Company | Apparatus and method for eddy current detection of subsurface discontinuities in conductive bodies |
| US4418574A (en) * | 1981-11-20 | 1983-12-06 | Texaco Inc. | Magnetic method and apparatus for measuring wall thickness |
| US4611170A (en) * | 1982-08-04 | 1986-09-09 | Pa Incorporated | Coil apparatus mounted on an axially split spool for indicating wall thickness variations of a length of ferromagnetic pipe |
| GB8303587D0 (en) * | 1983-02-09 | 1983-03-16 | Chapman Cash Processing Ltd | Coin discriminating apparatus |
-
1987
- 1987-12-17 US US07/133,952 patent/US4839593A/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
-
1988
- 1988-11-25 CA CA000584161A patent/CA1272265A/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
- 1988-11-25 DE DE88311194T patent/DE3882214T2/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
- 1988-11-25 EP EP88311194A patent/EP0321110B1/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 1988-12-02 JP JP63304294A patent/JPH01202653A/en active Pending
- 1988-12-07 NO NO885429A patent/NO304453B1/en unknown
- 1988-12-16 AU AU26954/88A patent/AU598705B2/en not_active Ceased
Also Published As
| Publication number | Publication date |
|---|---|
| US4839593A (en) | 1989-06-13 |
| NO304453B1 (en) | 1998-12-14 |
| NO885429D0 (en) | 1988-12-07 |
| AU2695488A (en) | 1989-06-22 |
| AU598705B2 (en) | 1990-06-28 |
| NO885429L (en) | 1989-06-19 |
| JPH01202653A (en) | 1989-08-15 |
| EP0321110A1 (en) | 1989-06-21 |
| DE3882214D1 (en) | 1993-08-12 |
| DE3882214T2 (en) | 1994-02-17 |
| EP0321110B1 (en) | 1993-07-07 |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| CA1272265A (en) | Method for directly detecting corrosion on conductive containers | |
| US4843319A (en) | Transient electromagnetic method for detecting corrosion on conductive containers having variations in jacket thickness | |
| US4843320A (en) | Transient electromagnetic method for detecting corrosion on conductive containers | |
| US6291992B1 (en) | Eddy current inspection technique | |
| EP0376635B1 (en) | Transient electromagnetic method for detecting irregularities on conductive containers | |
| US4990851A (en) | Transient electromagnetic method for detecting irregularities on conductive containers | |
| KR0169089B1 (en) | Transient electromagnetic inspection method and apparatus with moving sensors | |
| US6570379B2 (en) | Method for inspecting an object of electrically conducting material | |
| US4929896A (en) | Transient electromagnetic method for detecting irregularies on conductive containers having variations in jacket thickness | |
| AU1053100A (en) | Method and device for measuring in situ the distance between two specific elements in a tubular pipe | |
| EP0382981B1 (en) | Transient electromagnetic method for detecting irregularities on conductive containers having variations in jacket thickness | |
| US3363170A (en) | Pipe thickness detector utilizing a core structure which yields a narrow sensing field | |
| Stanley | Methods and results of inspecting coiled tubing and line pipe | |
| RU2250372C1 (en) | Electromagnetic well defect detector | |
| JPH08145954A (en) | Method and apparatus for eddy current detection testing |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| MKLA | Lapsed |