CA1314955C - Identification and authentication of end user systems for packet communications network services - Google Patents

Abstract

IDENTIFICATION AND AUTHENTICATION OF END USER
SYSTEMS FOR PACKET COMMUNICATIONS NETWORK SERVICES
Abstract A high capacity metropolitan area network (MAN) is described. Data traffic from users is connected to data concentrators at the edge of the network, and is transmitted over fiber optic data links to a hub where the data is switched.
The hub includes a plurality of data switching modules, each having a control means, and each connected to a distributed control space division switch.
Advantageously, the data switching modules, whose inputs are connected to the concentrators, perform all checking and routing functions, while the 1024x1024 maximum size space division switch, whose outputs are connected to the concentrators, provides a large fan-out distribution network for reaching many concentrators from each data switching module. Distributed control of the space division switch permits several million connection and disconnection actions to be performed each second, while the pipelined and parallel operation within the control means permits each of the 256 switching modules to process at least 50,000 transactions per second. The data switching modules chain groups of incoming packets destined for a common outlet of the space division switch so that only one connection in that switch is required for transmitting each group of chained packets from a data switching module to a concentrator. MAN provides security features including a port identification supplied by the data concentrators, and a check that each packet is from an authorized source user, transmitting on a port associated with that user, to an authorized destination user that is in the same group (virtual network) as the source user.

Description

~ 3 ~

IDENTIFICATION AND AUTHENTICATION OF END USER
SYSTEMS FOR PACKET COMMIJNICATIONS NETWORK SERVICES
Technical Field This invention relates to data networks and, more specifically, to 5 protocols for ensuring privacy in such networks.
- Problem In data processing systems involving a large amount of distributed computing, featuring large numbers of computers and including increasing numbers of personal computers, workstations, and data bases, it is frequently 10 necessary to exchange a great deal of data among these data processing systems. These exchanges require communicatlons networks. Such networks, when used for interconnecting data processing systems in an area heyond the geographical scope of local area networks but less than the scope of wide area networks, are referred to as metropolitan area networks, and require data 15 networks capable of transmitting a very high rate of data traffic and with low latency.
As requirements for data communications increase, the use of common carrier data networks becomes increasingly attractive. Such common carrier networks can be shared by many users thereby achievmg shared use of high-2 o speed data communication facilities such as fiber optic networks. Suchnetworks require a high degree of security to be useful.
In prior art common carrier data networks, a user commonly gets access to the data network transport mechanism through the use of appropriate password arrangements. When the user has access to this data network, 25 charges for the use of the network can be appropriately assigned to such a user and users not authorized to use the common carrier network can be kept off.
`~
A

.

.

2 1 3 1 ~
Subsequently, when a user has obtained a data path to anothPr terminal such as a data base system or a computer mainframe, additional password arrangements can be used to authenticate that user and ensure that the data base system or mainframe is not being accessed by unauthorized users of that 5 system. However, once a user has obtained access to a data network via the user's password, no further checks of that user's identi~lcation are made. One of the most l~requently used methods of illegally penetrating a secure data network is for an illegal user to take on the attributes of a legal user.
In shared medium common carrier networks, such as local area 10 net~vorks, it is especially difficult to check on the source of a packet, since each user has direct access to the shared medium.
A problem of the prior art therefore is that there is no efficient arrangement in a common carrier network or continuously authenticating the access capabilities of individual users of the network after these users have 15 logged into the system. An unauthorized user may capture the access of an authorized logged in user by heading his packets with that user's identification.
Solution The above problems are solved and an advance is made over the prior art in accordance with the principles of this invention wherein a user from a 2 o user port transmits data packets that include the user and port identity, and the packets are checked to ensure that the user/port is authori2ed.
Advantageously, such an arrangement prevents an unauthorized user, from a diferent port but using the authGrized user's identification, from gaining unauthorized access. The port identity is added by the network and is 25 therefore not under the control of the user. Advantageously, this prevents a user from indicating a false source for data being transmitted to the network.
The network supplies the destination port number within a reserved position in a packet header. Advantageously, this destination port number can be used at the destination edge of the network to route the pac~et only to the 3 0 proper destination port.
In accordance with one aspect of the invention there is provided in a data network, a method of obtaining securi~ in packet transmission from an input port to an output port, comprising the steps o including in each data packet an identity of said input port and an identity of a user ot said input port .

~3~3~

transmitting said each data packet; and in said network, prior to transmitting to said output port, for said each data packet, checking whether said user, identified by said user identity, has been previously authorized to transmit from said input port identified by said port identi~ if network transmission capacity5 is available.
In accordance with another aspect of the invention there is further provided a data network for transmitting data packets, comprising: means for inserting in a packet an identity of a port transmitting said packet, said meansbeing comprised in said network and out of control of a user at said port; and 10 means for authenticating from said identity of said port and from addressing data in said packet whether said port is authorized to transmit said packet to said network prior to transmitting said packet to a destination.
Brie~ Descri~tion of the Drawin~
FIG. 1 is a graphic representation of the characteristics of the type of 15 communications traffic in a metropolitan area network.
F~G. 2 is a high level block diagram of an exemplary metropolitan area network (referred to herein as MAN) including typical input user stations that communicate via such a network.
FIG. 3 is a more detailed block diagram of the hub of MAN and the 2 0 units communicating with that hub.
FIGS. 4 and 5 are block diagrams of MAN illustrating how data ~lows from input user systems to the hub of MAN and ba k to output user systems.
FIG. 6 is a simplified illustrative example of a type of net~,vork which 2 5 can be used as a circuit switch in the hub of MAN.
FIG. 7 is a block diagram of an illustrative embodiment of a MAN
circuit switch and its associated control network.
~ IGS. 8 and 9 are ~lowcharts representing the flow of requests from the data distribution stage of the hub to the controllers of the circuit switch of the 3 0 hub.
FIG. 10 is a block diagram of one data distribution switch of a hub.
FIGS. 11-14 are block diagrams and data layouts of portions of the data distribution s~,vitch of the hub.
F~G. 15 is a block diagram of an operation, administration, and ~ 3~9~

maintenance (OA&M) system for controlling the data distribution stage of the hub.
FIG. 16 is a block diagram of an interface module for interfacing between end user systems and the hub.
FIG. 17 is a block diagram of an arrangement for interfacing between an end user system and a network interface.
FIG. 18 is a block diagram of a typical end user system.
FIG. 19 is a block diagram of a control arrangement for interfacing between an end user system and the hub of MAN.
FIG. 20 is a layout of a data packet arranged for transmission through MAN illustrating the MAN protocol.
FIG. 21 illustrates an alternate arrangement for controlling access from the data distribution switches to the circuit switch control.
FIG. 22 is a block diagram illustrating arrangements for using MAN to .~
switch voice as well as data.
FIG. 23 illustrates an arrangement for synchronizing data received from the circuit switch by one of the data distribution switches.
PIG. 24 illustrates an alternate arrangement for the hub for switching packetized voice and data.
2 0 FIG. 25 is a block diagram of a MAN circuit switch controller.
General Description The Detailed Description of this specification is a description of an exemplary metropolitan area network (MAN) t~hat incorporates the present invention. Such a network as shown in lilGS. 2 and 3 includes an outer ring o 2 5 network interface modules (N~s) 2 connected by fiber optic links 3 to a hub1. The hub interconnects data and voice packets rom any of the NIMs to any other NIM. The NIMs, in turn, are connected via interface modules to user devices connected to the network.
The invention claimed herein concerns the protocol used within MAN
3 0 and specifically that portion of the protocol which is added as data packets ~' enter MAN and is checked within MAN in order to ensure that users can access MAN only f~om network ports assigned to such users. The portion of the Detailed Description which is most closely associated with the claimed invention is sections 9 and 10 and FIGS. 15 and 20.

.,~

1 31 ~955 Detailed Description Data ne~works o~ten are classified by their size and scope of ownership.
Local area networks (LANs) are usually owned by a single organization and 5 have a reach of a few kilometres. They interconnect tens to hundreds of terminals, computers, and other end user systems (EUSs). At the other extreme are wide area networks (WANs) spanning continents, owned by common carriers, and interconnecting tens of thousands of EUSs. Between these extremes other data networks have been identified whose scope ranges 10 from a campus to a metropolitan area. The high performance metropolitan area network to be described herein will be referred to as MAN. A table of acronyms and abbreviations is found in Appendix ~
Metropolitan area networks serve a variety of EUSs ranging from simple reporting devices and low intelligence terminals through personal 15 computers to large mainframes and supercomputers. The demands that these EUSs place on a network vary widely. Some may issue messages infrequently while others may issue many messages each second. Some messages may be only a few bytes while others may be files of n~llions of bytes. Some EUSs may require delivery any time within the next few hours while others may 2 0 require delivery within microseconds.
This invention of a metropolitan area network is a computer and teiephone communications network that has been designed ~or transmitting broadband low latency data which retains and indeed exceeds the performance characteristics of the highest performance local area networks. A metropolitan 25 area network has size characteristics similar to those of a class 5 or end-office telephone central office; consequently, with respect to size, a metropolitan area network can be thought of as an end-office for data. The exemplary embodiment oE the invention, hereinafter called MAN, was designed with this in mind. However, MAN also fits well either as an adjunct to or as part of a 3 0 switch module 131~

for an end-office, thus supporting broadband Integrated Selvices Digital Network(ISDN) services. MAN can also be effective as either a local area or campus areanetwork. It is able to grow gracefully from a small LAN throwgh campus sized networks to a full MAN.
The rapid proliferation of workstations and their servers, and the growth of distributed computing are major factors that motivated the design of this invention. MAN was designed to provide networking for tens of thousands of diskless workstations and servers and other computers over tens of kilometers, where each user has tens to hundreds of simultaneous and different associations l0 with other computers on the network. Each networked computer can concurrentlygenerate tens to hundreds of messages per second, and requ*e VO rates of ~ens tohundreds of millions of bits/second (Mbps). Message sizes may range from hundreds of bits to millions of bits. With this level of performance, MAN is capable of supporting remote procedure calls, interobject communications, ~emote15 demancl paging, remote swapping, file transfer, and computer graphics. The goal is to move most messages (or transactions as they will be referred to henceforth) from an EUS memory to another EUS memory within less than a millisecond for small transactions and within a few milliseconds for large transactions. FIG. 1 classifies transaction types and show desired EUS response times as a function of 20 both transaction type and size, simple (i.e., low intelligence) terminals 70, remote procedure calls (RPCs) and interobject communications (IOCs) 72, demand paging 74, memory swapping 761 animated computer graphics 78, computer graph;cs still pictures 80, file transfers 82, and packetized voice 84. Meeting the response time/transaction speeds of FIG. 1 represents part of the goals of the 25 MAN network. As a calibration, lines of constant bit rate are shown where the bit rate is likely to dominate the response time. Ml~N has an aggregate bit rate of 150 gigabits per second and can handle 20 million netwark transacîions per second with the exemplary choice of the processor elements shown in ~IG. 14.
Furthe~nore, it has been designed to handle traffic overloads gracefully.
MAN is a network which performs switching and routing as many systems do, but also addresses a myriad of o~her necessaIy functions such as error handling, user inter~acing, and the like. Significant privacy and security features in MAN are provided by an authentication capability. This capability prevents Imauthorized network use, enables usage-sensitive billing, and provides non-35 forgeable source identification for all in~ormation. Capability also exists for defining virtual private networks.

7 ~L 3 1 ~
MAN is a transaction-oAented (i.e.~ connectionless) network. It does not need to incur the overhead of establishing or maintaining connections although a connection veneer c~m be added in a straightfol~vard fashion if desired.
MAN can also be used for switching packetized voice. Because of 5 the short delay in traversing the network, the priority which may be given to the transmission of single packet entities, and the low variation of delay when the network is not heavily loaded, voice or a mixture of voice and data can be readily supported by MAN. For clarity, the term data as used hereinafter includes digital data representing voice signals, as well as digital data representing commands, 10 numerical data, graphics, programs, data files and other contents of memory.
MAN, though not yet completely built, has been extensively simulated. Many of the capacity estimates presented hereinafter are based on these simulations.

15 2.1 Architecture The MAN network is a hierarchical star architecture with two or three levels depending upon how closely one looks at the topology. FIG. 2 shows the network as consisting of a switching center called a hub 1 linked to network interface modules 2 (NIMs) at the edge of the network.
The hub is a very high performance transaction store-and-forward system that gracefillly grows from a small four link system to something very large that is capable of handling over 20 million network transactions per second and that has an aggre~ate bit rate of 150 gigabits per second.
Radiating ou~ from the hub for distances of up to tens of kil~metels 25 are optical fibers (or alternative data channels) called external links (XLs) (connect NIM to MINT)~ each capable of handling full duplex bit rates on the order of 150megabits per second. An XL terminates in a NIM.
A NIM, the outer edge of which delineates the edge of the network, acts as a concentrator/demultiplexer and also identifies network ports. It 30 concentrates when moving information into the network and demultiplexes when rnoving information out of the network. Its pu~pose in concentrating/demultiplexing is to interface multiple end user systems 26 (EUSs)to the network in such a way as to use the link efficiently and cost effectively.
Up to 20 EUSs 26 can be supported by each NIM depending upon the EUSs 35 networking needs. Examples of such EUSs are the increasingly common advanced function workstations 4 where ~he burst rates are already in the 10 Mbps ~3~L~9~

range (with the expectation that much faster systems will soon be available) with average rates orders of magnitude lower. If the EIJS needs an average rate that ;s closer to its burst rate and the average rates are of the same order of magnitude as that of a NIM, then a NIM can either provide multiple interfaces to a single S EUS 26 or can provide a single interface with the entire NIM and XL dedicated to that EUS. Examples of ~USs of this type include large mainframes S and file servers 6 for the above workstations, local area networks such as F.T~ERNBT(~) 8and high performance local area networks 7 such as Proteon~ 80, an 80 MBit token ring manufactured by Proteon Corp., or a system using a fiber distributed 10 data interface (FDDI), an evolving American National Standards Institute (ANSI) standard protocol ring interface. In the latter two cases, the L~N itself may dothe concentration and the NIM then degenerates to a single port netwo-rk interface module. Lower performance local area networks such as ETHERNET 8 and IBM
token rings may not need all of the capability that an entire NIM provides. In 15 these cases, the I,AN, éven though it concentratesj may connect to a port 8 on a multiport NIM.
Within each EUS there is a user interface module (UIM) 13. This unit serves as a high bit rate direct memory access port for the EUS and as a buffer for transactions received from the network. It also off-loads the EUS from 20 MAN interface protocol concerns. Closely associated with the UIM is the MAN
EUS-resident driver. It works with the UIM to format outgoing transactions, receive incoming transactions, implement protocols, and interface with the EUSs operating system.
A closer inspection (see FM. 3) of the hub reveals two different 25 functional units - a MAN switch (MANS) 10 and one or mor~ memory interface modules 11 (MI~rs). Each MINT is connected to up to four NIMs via XLs 3 and thus can accommodate up to 80 EUSs. The choice of four NIMs per MINT is based upon a nurnber of factors including transaction handling capacity, buffer memory size within the MINT, growabili~ of the network, failure group size, and 30 aggregate bit rate.
Each MINl~ is connected to the MANS by four internal links 12 (ILs) (connect MINT and M~N switch), one of which is shown for each of the MINTs in FIG. 3. The reason for four links in this case is different dhan it is for the XLs.
Here multiple links are necessary because the MINT will normally be sending 35 information through the MANS to multiple destinations concurrendy; a single IL
would present a botdeneck. The choice of 4 ILs (as well as many other design 131~3~

choices of a similar nature) was made on the basis of extensive analytical and simulation modeling. The ILs run at the same bit rate as the external links but are very sholt since the entire hub is colocated.
The smallest hub consists of one MINT with the ILs looped back and 5 no switch. A network based upon this hub includes up to four NIMs and accommodate up to 80 EUSs. The largest hub that is currently envisioned consists of 256 MINTs and a 1024 x 1024 MANS. This hub accommodates 1024 NIMs and up to 20,000 EUSs. By adding MINTs and growing the MANS, the hub and ultimately the entire network grows very gracefully.
10 2.1.1 LUWUs, Packets, SUWUs, and Transactions Before going further several terms need to be discussed. EUS
transactions are transfers of units of EUS infolmation that are meaningful to the EUS. Such transactions might be a remote procedure call consisting of a few bytes or the transfer of a 10 megabyte database. MAN recognizes two EUS
15 transaction unit sizes that are called long user work lmit (LUWUs) and short user work units (SUWUs) ~or the purposes of this description. While the delimiting size is easily engineerable, usually transaction units of a couple of thousand bits or less are considered SUWUs while larger transaction units are LUWUs. Packets are given priority within the network to reduce response time based upon criteria 20 shown in FIG. 1 where it can be seen that the smaller EUS transaction units usually need faster EUS transaction response times. Packets are kept intact as asingle frame or packet as they move through the network. LUWUs are fragmented into frames or packets, called packets hereinafter, by the transmitting UIM. Packets and S~VUs are sometimes collectively referred to as network 25 transaction units.
Transfers through the MAN switch are referred to as switch transactions and the units transferred through the MANS are switch transaction units. They are composed of one or more network transaction units destined for the sàme NIM.
30 2.2 Functional Umt Ovelview Prior to disçussing the operation of MAN, it is useful to provide a brief overview of each major functional unit within the network. The units described are the UlM 13, NIM 2, MINT 11, MANS 10, end user system link (connects NIM and UIM) (EUSL) 14, XL 3, and IL 12 respectively. These units 35 are depicted in FIG. 4.

1 3 ~

2.2.1 User Interi~ace Module - UIM 13 This module is located within the EIJS and often plugs onto an EUS
backplane such as a VME(~ bus (an IEEE standard bus), an Intel MULTIBUS
II(~), mainframe I/O channel. It is designed to fit on one printed circuit board for S ms)st applications. The UIM 13 connects to the NIM 2 over a duplex optical fiber link called the EUS link 14 (EUSL), driven by optical transrnitter 97 and 85. This link runs at the same speed as the external link (XL) 3. The UIM has a memory queue 15 used to store inforrnation on its way to the network. Packets and SUWUs are stored and,forwarded to the NIM using out-of-band flow control.
By way of contrast, a receive bu~fer memory 90 must exist to receive information from the network. In this case en~ire EUS ~ransactions may sometimes be stored until they can be transferred into End User System memory.
The receive buffer must be capable of dynamic buffer chaining. Partial EUS
transactions may arrive concurrently in an interleaved fashion.
Optical Receiver 87 receives signals *om optical link 14 for storage in receive buffer memory 90. Control 25 controls UIM 13, and controls exchange of data between transrnit first-in-first-out (FIFO~ queue 15 or receive buffer memory 90 and a bus interface for interfacing with bus 92 which connects to end user system 26. The details of the control of UIM 13 are shown in FIG. 19.
20 2.2.2 Network Interface Module - NIM 2 A ND~I 2 is the part of MAN that is at the edge of the network. A
NIM performs six functions: (1) concentration/demultiplexing including queuing of packets and SUWUs moving toward the MINT and external link arbitration, (2) participation in network security using port identification, (3) pa~ticipation in 25 congestion control, (4) EUS-to-network control message identification, (5) participation in error handling, and (6) network interfacing. Small queues 94 inmemory similar to thosé 15 found in the UIM exist for each End User System.
They receive information from the UIM via link 14 and receiver 88 and store it until XL 3 is available for transmission to the MINT. The outputs of these queues 30 drive a data concentrator 95 which in turn drives an optical transmitter 96. An external link demand multiplexer exists which services demands for the use of the XL. The NIM prefixes a port identification number 600 (FI&. 20) to each network transaction unit flowing toward the MINT. This is used in various ways to provide value added services such as reliable and non-fraudulent sender 35 identification and billing. This prefix is particularly desirable for ensuring that members of a virtual network are protected from unauthorized access by outsiders.

- 11 13~
A check sequence is processed for error control. The NIM, working with the hub 1, determines congestion status within the network and controls flow *om theUIMs under high congestion conditions. The NIM also provides a standard physical and logical interface to the network including flow control mechanisms.Inforrnation flowing from the network to the EUS is passed through the NIM via receiver 89, distributed to the correct UIM by data distributor 86, and sent to destination UIM 13 by transmitter 85 via link 14. No bufi`ering is done at the NIM.
There are only two types of NIMs. One type (such as shown in 10 FIG. 4 and thç upper right of E~IG. 3) concentrates while the other type (shown at the lower right of FIG. 3) does not.
2.2.3 Mem~y and Interface Module - MINT 11 MINTs are located in the hub. Each MINT 11 consists of: (a) up to four exte~nal link handlers 16 (XLHs) that terminate XLs and also receive signals 15 from the half of the intemal link that moves data from the switch 10 to the MINT;
(b) four internal link handlers 17 (ILHs) that generate data for the half of the IL
that moves data from a MINT to the switch; (c) a memory 18 for storing data while awaiting a path from the MINT throwgh the switch to the destination NIM;
(d) a Data Transport Ring 19 that moves data between the link handlers and the 20 memory and also carries MINT control information; and (e) a control unit 20.
All fi~nctional units within the MINT are designed to accommodate the peak aggregate bit rate for data moving concurrently into and out of the MINT. Thus the ring, which is synchronous, has a set of reserved slots for moving informadon from each XLH to memory and another set of reserved slots 25 for moving info~mation from memory to each ILH. It has a read plus write bit rate of over 1.5 &bps. The memory is 512 bits wide so that an adequate memory bit rate can be achieved with componen~s having reasonable access times. ~e si~e of the rnemory (16 Mbytes~ can be kept small because the occupancy dme of information in the memory is also small (about 0.57 milliseconds under full 30 network load). However, this is an engineerable number that can be adjusted if necessaIy.
The XLHs aue bi-directional but not symmetric. Infolmation moving from NIM to MINT is stored in MINT memory. Header infonnation is copied by the XLH and sent to the MINT control for processing. In contrast, information 35 moving from the switch 10 toward a NIM is not stored in the MINT bl t simply passes through the MINT, withollt being processed, on its way from MANS 10 - 12- 13~ ~9~5 output to a destination NIM 2. Due to variable path lengths in the switch, the information leaving the MANS 10 is out of phase with respec~ to the XL. A
phase alignment and scrambler circuit (desclibed in section 6.1) must align the data before transmission to the NIM can occur. Section 4.6 describes the internal 5 link handler (ILH).
The MINT performs a variety of functions including (1) some of the overall routing within the network, (2) participation in user validation, (3~
participation in network security, (4) queue management, (5) buffering of network transactions, (6) address translation, (7) participation in congestion control, and (8) 10 the genera~ion of operation, administration, and maintenance (OA&M) prirnitives.
The control for the MINT is a data flow processing system tailored to the MINT control algorithms. Each MINT is capable of processing up to 80,000 network transactions per second. A fully provisioned hub with 250 MINTs can therefore process 20 million network transactions per second. This is lS discussed further in section 2.3.
2.2.4 MAN Switch - MANS 10 The MANS consists of two main parts (a) the fabric 21 through which information passes and (b) the control 22 for that fabric. The control allows the switch to be set up in about 50 microseconds. Special properties of the fabric 20 allow the control to be decomposed into completely independent sub-controllers that can operate in parallel. Additionally, each sub-controller can be pipelined.
Thus, not only is ~he setup time very fast but many paths can be set up concurrently and the "setup throughput" can be made high enough to accornmodate high request rates from large numbers of MINTs. MANs can be 25 made in various sizes ranging from 16x16 (handling four MINTs) to 1024 x 1024 (handling 256 MINTs).
2.2.5 End User System Link - EUSL 14 The end user system link 14 connects the NIM 2 to the UIM 13 that resides within the end user's equipment. It is a full duplex optical fiber link that 30 runs at the same rate and in synchronism with the eternal link on the other side of the NIM. It is dedicated to the EUS to which it is connected. The length of the EUSL is intended to be on the order of meters to 10s of meters. However, there is no reason why it couldn't be longer if economics allow it.
The basic t`onnat and data rate for the EUSL for the present 35 embodiment of the invention was chosen to be the same as that of the MetrobusLigh~wave System OS-I link. Whatever link layer data transmission standard is 13~9~

eventually adopted would be used in later embodiments of MAN.
2.2.6 External Links - XL 3 The external link (XL) 3 connects the NlM to the MINT. It is also a full duplex synchronous optical fiber link. It is used in a demand multiplexed S fashion by the end user systems connected to its NIM. The length of the XL is intended to be on the order of 10s of kilometers. Demand multiplexing is used for economic reasons. It employs the Metrobus OS-l format and data rate.
2.2.7 Internal Links - IL 24 The internal link 24 provides connectivity between a MINT and the 10 MAN switch. It is a unidirectional semi-synchronous link that retains frequency but loses the synchronous phase relationship as it passes through ~he MANS 10.
The length of the IL 24 is on the order of meters but could be much longer if econom~cs allowed. The bit rate of the IL is the same as that of OS-l. The format, however, has only limited similarity to OS-l because of the need to 15 resynchronize the data.
2.3 Software Overview Using a workstation/server paradigm, each end user system connected to MAN is able to generate over 50 EUS transactions per second consisting of LUYVUs and SUWUs. This translates into about 400 network transactions per 20 second (packets and SUWUs~. With up to 20 EUS per NIM, each NIM must be capable of handling up to 8000 network transactions per second with each MINT
handling up to four times this arnount or 3~000 network transactions per second.These are average or sustained rates. Burst conditions may substantially increase "instantaneous" rates for a single EUS 26. Avera,ging over a number of EUSs 25 will, however, smooth out individual EUS bursts. Thus while each NIM port must deal with bursts of considerably more than 50 network transactions per second, NIMs (2) and XLs (3) are likely to see only moderate bursts. This is even more true of MIN~s 11, each of which serves 4 NIMs. The MAN switch 10 must pass an average of 8 million network transactions per second, but the switch 30 controller does not need to process this many switch requests since the design of the MINT control allows multiple packets and SUWUs going to the same destination NIM to be switched with a single switch setup.
A second factor to be considered is network transaction interarrival time. With rates of 150Mbps and the smallest network transaction being an 35 SUWU of 1000 bits, two SUWUs could arrive at-a NIM or MINT 6.67 microseconds apart. NIMs and MINTs must be able to handle several back-to-- 14 - ~ 3 ~
back SUWUs on a transient basis.
The control software in the NIMs and especially the MINTs must deal with this severe real-time transaction processing. The asymmetry and bursty nature of data traffic requires a design capable of processing peak loads for short 5 periods of time. Thus the transaction control software structure must be capable of executing many hundreds of millions of CPU instructions per second (100's of MIPs). Moreover, in MAN, this control software performs a multiplicity of functions including routing of packets and SUWUs, network port identification, queuing of network transactions destined for the same NIM over up to 1000 NIMs 10 ~this means real time maineenance of up to 1000 queues), handling of MANS
requests and acknowledgements, flow control of source EUSs based on complex criteria, network traffic data collection, congestion control, and a mynad of other tasks.
The MAN control software is capable of performing all of the above 15 tasks in real time. The ~control software is executed in three major components:
NIM control 23, MINT controi 20, and MANS con~ol 22. Associated with these three control components is a fourth control structure 25 within the UIM 13 of the End User System 26. FIG. S shows this arrangement. Each NIM and MINT has its own control unit. The control units function independently but cooperate 20 closely. This partitioning of control is one of the architectural mechanisms that makes possible MAN's real-time transaction processing capability. The other mechanism that allows MAN to handle high transaction rates is the technique of decomposing the control into a logical array of subfunctions and independently applying processing power to each subfunction. This approach has been greatly 25 facilitated by the use of Transputerg' very large scale integration (VLSI) proeessor devices made by INMOS Corp. The technique basically is as follows:
- Decompose the problem into a number of subfunctions.
- Arrange the subfuncdons to form a dataflow structure.
Implement each subfunction as one or more processes.
30 - Bind sets of processes to processors, alTanging the bound processors in the same topology as the dataflow structure so as to form a dataflow system that will execute the f~mction.
- Iterate as necessary to achieve the real-time performance required.
Brief descriptions of the functions performed by the NIM, MINI, and 35 MANS (most of which a~e done by the software control for those modules) are given in sections 2.2.~ ~hrough 2.2.4. Additional information is given in section - 15- 131~
2.4. Detailed descriptions are included later in this description within specific sections covering these subsystems.
2.3.1 Control Processors The processors chosen for the system implementation are Transputers 5 from INMOS Corp. These 10 million instructions/second (MIP) reduced instruction set control (RISC) machines are designed to be connected in an arbitrary topology over 20 Mbps serial links. Each machine has four links with an input and output path capable of simultaneous direct memory access (DMA).
2.3.2 MINT Control Perfolmance Because of the need to process a large number of transactions per second, the processing of each transaction is broken into serial sections which form a pipeline. Transactions are fed into this pipeline where ~hey are processed simultaneously with other transactions at more advanced stages within the pipe.
In addition, there are multiple parallel pipelines each handling unique processing 15 streams simultaneously. Thus, the required high transaction processing rate, where each transaction requires routing and other complex servicing, is achieved by breaking the control structure into such a paralleVpipelined fabric of interconnected processors.
A constraint on MINT control is that any serial processing can take no 20 longer than 1 / (number of transactions per second processed in this pipeline).

A further constraint concerns the burst bandwidth for headers entering the control within an XLH 16. If the time between successive network units arriving at the XLH is less than (header size) / (bandwidth into control) then the XLH must buffer headers. The max~mum number of transactions per second assuming uniform arrival is given by:

(bandwidth into control) / ( size of transaction header).

An exarnple based upon the effective bit rate of transputer links and the 40 byte 30 MAN network transaction header is:
!

~ 3 ~

(8.0Mb/s for control link)/(320 bit header/transaction) = 25,000 transactions/sec. per XLH, or one transaction per XLH every 40 microseconds. Because transaction inter~rival times can be less than this, header buffering is performed in the XLH.
The MINT must be capable, within this time, of roudng, executing billing primitives, making switch requests, performing network control, memory management, operation, administration, and maintenance activities, narne servillg, and also providing other network services such as yellow page primitives. The paralleV pipelined nature of MINT control 20 achieves these goals.
As an example, the allocating and freeing of high-speed memory blocks can be processed completely independently of routing or billing primitives.
Transaction flow within a M~T is controlled in a single pipe by the management of the memory block address used for storing a network transaction unit (ie.
packet or SUVVU). At the first stage of the pipe, memory manageFnent allocates 15 free blocks of high-speed MINT memory. Then, at the next stage, these blocks are paired with the headers and routing translation is done. Then switch units are collected based on memory blocks sent to common NIMs, and to close the loop the memory Uocks are freed after the blocks' data is transmitted into the MANS.
Rilling primitives are simultaneously handled within a different pipe.
20 2.4 MAN Operation The EUS 26 is viewed by the network as a user with capabilides granted by a network administration. This is analogous to a terminal user loggedinto a time-sharing system. The user, such as a workstation or a front end processor acting as a concentrator for stations or cven networks, will be required 25 to make a physical connecdon at a NIM port and then identify itself via its MAN
name, virtual network identification, and password security. The network adjustsrouting tables to map data destined f~r this name to a ~mique NIM po~. The capabilities of this user are associated with the physical port. The example just given accommodates the paradigm of a portable worksta~ion. Ports may also be 30 configured to have fixed capabilities and possibly be "owned" by one MAN named end user. This gives users dedicated network ports ~r provides privileged administrative maintenance ports. The source EUS refer to the destination by MAN names or services, so they are not required to know anything about the dynamic network topology.
!

13~g~5 The high bit rate and large transaction processing capability internal to the network yield very short response times and provide the EUS with a means to move data in a metropolitan area without undue network considerations. A MAN
end user will see EUS memory-to-EUS memory response times as low as a 5 millisecond, low error rates, and the ability to send a hundred EUS transactions per second on a sustained basis. This number can expand to several thousand for high performance EUSs. The EUS will send data in whatever size is appropriate ~o his needs with no maximum upper bound. Most of the limitations on optimizing MAN performance are imposed by the limits of the ~US and 10 applications, not the overhead of the network. The user will supply the following in~ormation on transmitting data to the UIM:
- A MAN name and virtual network name for the destination address that is independent of the physical address.
- The size of the data.
15 - A MAN type field denoting network service required.
- The data.
Network transactions (packets and SUWUs3 move along the following logical path (see FIG. 5):

sourceUIM ==> sourceNIM ==> MINT =--> MANS==> destinationNIM(via 20 MINT) ==> destinationUIM.

Each EUS transaction (i.e., LUVVU or SUWU) is submitted to its UIM. Inside the UIM, a LUWU is further fragmented into variable size packets. An SUWU is not fragmented but is logically viewed in its entirety as a network transaction.
However, the determination that a network transaction is an SUWU is not made 25 until the SUWU reaches the MINT where the info~nation is used in dynamically categorizing data into SUWUs and packets for optimal network handling. The NIM checks incoming packets from the EUS to verify that they do not violate a maximum packet size. The UIM may pick packet sizes smaller than the maximum depending on EUS stated service. For optimum MINT memory 30 utilization, the packet size is the standard maximum. However under some circumstances, the application may request that a smaller packet size be used because of end user consideration such as timing problems vr data availability timing. Additionally, there may be timing limits where the UlM will send what itcur~ently has from the EUS. Even where the maximum size packet is used, the ~ 3~9~

last packet of a LUWU usually is smaller than the maximum size packet.
At the transmitting UIM each network transaction (packet or SUWU~
is prefixed with a fixed length MAN network header. It is the information withinthis header which the MAN network sof~ware uses to rou~e, bill, offer network 5 services, and provide network control. The destination UIM also uses the information within this header in its job of delivering EUS transactions to the end user. The network transactions are stored in the UIM source transaction queue from which they are transmitted to the source NIM.
Upon receiving ne~work transactions from UIMs, the NIM receives 10 them in queues permanently dedicated to the EUSLs on which the transaction arrived, for forwarding to the MINT 11 as soon as the link 3 becomes available.
The control software within the NIM processes the UIM tO NIM protocol to identify cortrol messages and prepends a source port number to the transa~tion that will be used by the MINT to authenticate the transaction. End-user data will 15 never be touched by MAN network software unless the data is addressed to ~e network as control information provided by the end user. As the transactions areprocessed, the source NIM concentrates them onto the external link between the source NIM and its MINT. The source NIM to MINT links terminate at a hardware interface in the MINT (the external link handler or XLH 16).
The external link protocol between the NIM and MINT allows the XLH 16 to detect the beginning and end of network transactions. The transactionsare immediately movedi into a memory 18 designed to handle the 150Mb/s bursts of data arriving at the XLH. This memory access is via a high-speed time slottedring 19 which guarantees each 150Mb/s XLH input and each 150Mb/s output from 25 the MINT (ie. MANS inputs) bandwidth with no contention. For example, a MINT which concentrates 4 remote NIMs and has 4 input ports to the center switch must have a burst access bandwidth of at least 1.2Gb/s. The memory storage is used in fixed length blocks of a size equal to the maximum packet size plus the fixed length MAN header. The XLH moves an address o~ a ISxed size 30 memory block followed by the packet or SUWU data to the memory access ring.
The data and network header are stored until the MINT conhol 20 causes its transmission into the MANS. The MINT control 20 will continually supply the XLHs with free memory block addresses for storing the incoming packets and SUWUs. The XLH also "knows" the length of the fixed size network header.
35 With this inforrnation the XLH passes a copy of the network header to MINT
con~rol 20. MINT control 20 pairs the header with the block address it had given - 19 ~ 3 ~
the XLH for storing the packet or SUWU. Since the header is the only internal representation of the data within MINT con~ol it is vital that it be colTect. Toensure sanity cl~le to potential link errors the header has a cyclic redundancy check (CRC) of its own. The path this tuple takes within MINT control must be the 5 same for all packets of ~ny given LUWU (this allows ordering of LUWU data to be preserved). Packet and SUWU headers paired with the MINT memory block acldress will move through a pipeline of processors. The pipeline allows multiple CPUs to process different network transactions at various stages of MINT
processing. In additionj there are multiple pipelines to provide concu~rent 10 processing.
MINT control 20 selects an unused internal link 24 and requests a path setup from the IL to the desdnation NIM ~through the MINT attached to that NIM). MAN switch control 21 queues the request and when, the path is available and (2) the XL 3 to the destination NIM is also available, it notifies the source 15 MINT while concurrently setting up the path. This, on average and under full load, takes 50 microseconds. Upon notification, the source MINT transmits all network transactions destined for that NIM, thus taking maximum advantage of the path setup. The internal link handler 17 requests network transactlons fi~omthe MINT memory and transmits them over ~he path:
ILH ==> sourceIL ==> MANS ==> destinationIL ==> XLH, this XLH being attached to the destination NIM. The XLH recovers bit syncXroni~ation on the way to the destination NIM. Note that information, as it leaves the switch, simply passes through a MINT on its way to the destination NIM. The MINT doesn't process it in any way other than to recover bit 25 synchronization that has been lost in going through the MANS.
As information (i.e., switch transactions made up of one or more network transactions) arrives at the destination NIM it is demultiplexed into network transactions ~packets and SUWUs) and forwarded to the destination UIMs. This is done "on the fly"; there is no buffering in the NIM on the way out30 of the network.
The receiving UIM 13 will store the network transactions in its receive buffer memory ~0 and recreate EUS transactions (LUWUs and SUWUs).
A LUWU may arrive af the UIM in packet sized pieces. As soon as at least part of a LUWU arrives, the UIM will noti-fy the EUS of its existence and will, upon - 20 - ~ 3 ~
instructions from the FUS, transmit under the control of its DMA, par~ial E~US or whole EUS transactions into the EIJS memory in DMA transfer sizes specified by the EUS. Alternate paradigms exist for transfer from UIM to EUS. For instance, an EUS can tell the UIM ahead of time that whenever anything arrives the UIM
5 should transfer it to a specified b~l~fer in EUS memory. The UIM would then not need to announce the arrival of information but would immediately trans~er it tothe EUS.
2.5 Additional Considerations 2.5.1 Error Handling In order to achieve latencies in the order of hundreds of rnicrose onds from EUS memory to EUS memory, errors must be handled in a manner that differs from that used by conventional data networks today. In MAN, network transactions have a header check se~quence 62~ (FIG. 20) (HCS) appended to the header and a data check sequence 646 (FIG. 20) (DCS) appended to the entire 15 network transaction.
Consider the header first. The source UIM generates a HCS before transmission to the source NIM. At the MINT the HCS is checked and, if in error, the transaction is discarded. The destination N~I performs a similar action for a third time before routing the transaction to the destination UIM. This 20 scheme prevents misdelivery of information due to corrupted headers. Once a header is found to be ~awed, nothing in the header can be considered reliable and the only option that MAN has is to discard the transaction.
The source UIM is also required to provide a DCS at the end of the user data. This field is checked within the MAN network but no action is taken if 25 errors are found. The information is delivered to the destination UIM who cancheck it and take appropriate action. Its use within the network is to identify both EUSL and internal network problems.
Note that there is never any attempt within the network to correct errors using the usual automatic repeat request (ARQ) techniques ;fiound in most of 30 today's protocols. The need for low latency precludes this. Erro~ coIIecting schemes would be too costly except for the headers, and even here the time penalty may be too great as has sometimes been the case in computer systems.
However, header error correction may be employed later if experience proves thatit is needed and time-wise possible.

-21- ~3~
Consequently, MAN checks for errors and discards transactions when there is reason to suspect the validity of the headers. Beyond this, transactions are delivered even if flawed. This is a reasonable approach for three reasons. First, intrinsic error rates over optical fibers are of the same order as error rates ov~r 5 copper when common ARQ protocols are employed. Both are in the range of 10-11 bits per bit. Secondly, graphics applications (which are increasing dramatically) often can tolerate small error rates where pixel images are transmitted; a bit or two per image would usually be fine. Finally, where error rates need ~o be better than the intrinsic rates, EUS-to-33US AR~ protocols can be 10 used (as they are today) to achieve these improved error rates.
2.5.2 Authentication MAN provides an authentication feature. This feat~e assures a destination EUS of the identity of the source EUS for each and every transactionit receives. Malicious users cannot send transactions with forged "signatures".
15 Users are also prevented from using the network free of charge; all users areforced to identify themselves truthfully with each and every transaction that they send into the network, thus providing ~or accurate usage-sensitive billing. Thisfeature also provides the primitive capability for other -features such as virtual lprivate networks.
When an EUS first attaches to MAN, it "logs in" to a well known and privileged Login Server that is part of the network. The login server is in an administrative terminal 350 (FIG. 15) with an attached disk memory 351. The administrative terminal 350 is arcessed via an OA&M MINT processor 315 (FIG. 14) and a MINT OA&M monitor 317 in the MINT central control 20, and 25 an ()A~M central control ~IG. 15). This login is achieved by the EUS (via itsUIM) sending a login transaction to the serYer through the network. This transaction contains the EUS identification number (its name), its requested viItual netwo~k, and a password. In the NIM a port number is prefixed to the transactionbefore it is forwarded to the MINT for routing to the server. The Login Se~ver 30 notes the id/port pa~ring and informs the MINT attached to the source NIM of that pairing. It also acknowledges its receipt of the login to the EUS, telling the EUS
that ît may now use the network.
When using the network, each and every network transaction that is sent to the source NIM from the EUS has, within its header, its source id plus 35 other information in the header described below with respect to FIG. 20. The NIM prefixes the port number to the transaction and forwards it to the MINT

- 22 - ' 131 ~
where the pairing is checked. Incorrect pairing results in the MINT discarding the tr~msaction. In the MINT, the prefixed source port number is replaced with a destination port number before it is sent to the destination NIM. The destination NIM uses this destination port number tO complete the routing to the destina$ion5 EUS.
If an EUS wishes to disconnect from the network, it "logs of~' in a manner similar to its login. The Login Server informs the MINT of this and the MINT removes the id/port information, thus rendering that port inactive.
2.5.3 Guaranteed Orderin~
From NIM to NIM the notion of a LUWU does not exist. Even though LlJWUs lose their identity within the NIM to NIM envelope, the packets of a given LUWU must follow a path through predetermined XLs and MINl`s.
This allows ordering of packets arriving at UIMs to be preserved for a LUWU.
However, packets may be discarded due to flawed headers. The UIM checks for 15 missing packets and notifies the EUS in the event that this occurs.
2.5.4 Virtual Circuits and Infinite LUWUs The network does not set up a circuit through to the destination but rather switches groups of packets and SUWUs as resources become available.
This does not prevent the EUS from setting up virtual circuits; for example the 20 EUS could write an infinite size LUWU with the appropriate UIM timing parameters. Such a data stream would appear to the EUS as a virtual circuit while to the network it would be a never ending LUWU that moves packets at a time.
The implementation of this concept must be handled between the UIM and the EUS protocols since there may be rnany different types of EUS and UIMs. The 25 end-user can be transmitting multiple data streams to any number of destinations at any one time. These strearns are multiplexed on packet and SUWlJs boundaries on the transmit link between the source UIM and the source NIM.
A parameter, to be adjusted for optimum performance as the system is loaded, limits the time ~equivalent to limiting the length of the data stream) that 30 one MINT can send data to a N~ in order to free that NIM to receive data fromother MINTs. An initial value of 2 milliseconds appears reasonable based on simulations. The value can be adjusted dynamically in response to traffic pattems in the system, with different values possible for different MlNTs or NIMs, and at different times of the day or different days of the week.

- 23 - ' The MAN switch (MANS) ;s the fast circuit switch at the center of the MAN hub. It interconnects the ~vIINTs, and all end-user transactions must pass through it. The MANS consists of the switch fabric itself, ~called the dataS network or DNet), plus the switch control cornplex (SCC), a collection of controllers and links that operate the DNet fabric. The SCC must receive requests from the MINTs to connect or disconnect pairs of incoming and outgoing internal links (ILs), execute the requests when possible, and inform the MINTs of the outcome of their requests~
These apparently straightforward operations must be carried out at a high performance level. The demands of the MAN switching problem are discussed in the next section. Next, Section 3.2 presents the fundamentals of a distributed-control circuit-switched network that is offered as a basis for a solution to such switching demands. Section 3.3 tailors this approach to the specific needs 15 of MAN and covers some aspects of the control structure that are critical to high performance.
3.1 Characterizing the Problem First we esdrnate some numerical values for the demands on the MAN switch. Nominally, the MANS must establish or remove a transacdon's 20 connection in fractions of a millisecond in a network with hundreds of ports, each running at 150 Mb/s and each carrying thousands of separately switched transactions per second. Millions of transaction requests per second imply a distributed control structure where numerous pipelined controllers process transaction requests in pamllel.
The combination of so many ports each running a high speed has several implications. First, the bandwidth of the network must be at least 150 Gb/s, thus requiring multiple data paths (nominally 150 Mb/s) through the network. Second, a 150 Mb/s synchronous network would be difficult to build (although an asynchronous network needs to recover clock or phase?. Third, since30 inband signaling creates a more complex (self-routing) network fabric and requires buffering within the network, an out-of-band signaling (separate control~ approach is desirable.
In MAN, transaction lengths are expected to vary by several orders of magnitude. These transactions can share a single switch, as discussed hereinafter 35 with adequate delay performance for small transactions. The advantage of a single ~abric is that data strearns do not have to be separated before switching and -24- ~31~
recombined afterwards.
A problem to be dealt with is the condition where the requested output port is busy. To set up a connection, the given input and output ports must be concurrently idle (the so-called concurrency problem). If an idle input (output) 5 port waits gor the output (input) to become idle, the waiting port is ine~ficiently utilized and other transactions needing that port are delayed. If the idle port is instead given to other ~ansactions, the original busy destination port may have become idle and busy again in the meantime, thus adding further delay to the original transaction. The delay problem is worse when the port is busy with a 10 large transaction.
Any concurrency resolution strategy requires that each port's busy/idle status be supplied to the controllers concerned with it. To maintain a high transaction rate, this status update mechanism must operate with short delays.
If transaction times are short and most delays are caused by busy 15 ports, an absolutely non-blocking network topology is not required, but the blocking probability should be small enough so as not to add much to delays or burden the SCC with excessive unachievable connection requests.
Broadcast (one to many) connections are a desirable network capability. However, even if the network supports broadcasting, the concurrency 20 problem (here even worse with the many ports involved) must be handled without disrupting other traffic. This seems to rule out the simple strategy of waiting for all destination ports to become idle and broadcasting to all of them at once.
Regardless of the special needs of the MAN network, the MANS
satisfies the general requirements for any practical network. Startup costs are 25 reasonable. The network is growable without disrupting existing fabric. The topology ;s inherently efficient in its use of fabric and circuit boards. Finally, the concerns of operational a~ailability - reliability, fault tolerance, failure-grollp sizes, and ease of diagnosis and repair - are met.
3,2 General Approach - A Distributed-Control Circuit-Switching Network In this section we describe the basic approach used in the MANS. It specifically addresses the means by which a large network can be run by a group of controllers operating in parallel and independendy of one another. The distributed control mechanism is described in terms of two stage networks, but with a scheme to extend the approach to multistage networks. Section 3.3 35 presents details of the specific design for MAN .

-25- 13~9~
A major advantage of our approach is that the plurality of network controllers operate independently of one another using only local information.
Throughput (measured in transactions~ is increased because controllers do not burden each other with queries and responses. Also the delay in setting up or S tearing down connections is reduced because the number of sequential control steps is minimized. All this is possible because the network fabric is partitioned into disjoint subsets, each of which is controlled solely by its own controller that uses global static information, such as the inteInal connection pattern of the data network 120, but only local dynarnic (network state) data. Thus, each conlroller10 sees and handles only those connection requests that use the portion of the network for which it is responsible, and monitors the state of only that portion.
3.2.1 Partitioning Two-Stage Networks Consider the 9 x 9 two-stage network example in FIG. 6 comprising three input switches ISl (101), IS2 (102), and IS3 (103), and three output switches 15 OSl (104), OS2 (105), and OS3 (106). We can partition its fabric into three disjoint subsets. Each subset includes the fabric in a given second stage switch(OS~) plus the fabric (or crosspoints) in the first sta~e switches (ISy) that connect $o the links going to that second stage switch. For example, in FIG. 6, the partition or subset associated with C)Sl ~104~ is shown by a dashed line around 20 the crosspoints in OSl plus dashed lines around three crosspoints in each of the first stage switches l101,102,103) (those crosspoints being those that connect to the links to OSl).
Now, consider a controller for this subset of the network. It would be responsible for connections from any inlet to any oudet on OSl. The controller 25 would maintain busy/idle status for the crosspoints it controlled. This infolmation is clearly enough to tell whether a connecdon is possible. For example, suppose an inlet on ISl is to be connected to an outlet on OSl. We assume that the request is from the inlet, which must be idle. The outlet can be determined to be idle from outlet busy/idle status memory or else from the status of the oudet's 30 three crosspoints in OSl (all three must be idle). Next, the status of the link between ISl and OSl must be checked. This link will be idle if the two crossyoints on both ends of the link, which connect the link to the remainin~ two inlets and outiets, are all idle. If the inlet, outlet, and link are all idle, acrosspoint in each of ISl and OSl can be closed to set up the requested 35 connection.

1 3 ~

Note that this activity can proceed independently of activities in the other subsets (disjoint) of the network. The reason is that the network has onlytwo stages, so the inlet switches may be partitioned according to their links tosecond stage switches. In theory this approach applies to any two-stage network,5 but the usefulness of the scheme depends on the network's blocking characteristics. The network in FIG. 6 would block too frequently, because it can connect at most one inlet on a given inlet switch to an outlet on a given secondstage switch.
A two-stage network, referred to hereinafter as a Richards network, of 10 the type described in G. W. Richards et al.: "A Two-Stage Rearrangeable Broadcast Switching Network, IEEE Transactions on Communications, v. COM-33, no. 10, October 1985, avoids this problem by wiring each inlet port to multiple appearances spread over different inlet switches. The distributed control scheme operates on a Richards network, even though MAN may not use such 15 Richards network features as broadcast and rearrangement.
3.2.2 Control Network 3.2.2.1 Function In MAN, requests for connections come from inlets, actually, the central control 20 of the MINTs. These requests must be distIibuted to the proper 20 switch controller via a control network (CNet). In FIG. 7, both the DNet 120 for circuit-switched transactions and the control CNet 130 are shown. Ihe DNet is a two-stage rearrangeably non-blocking Richards network. Each switch 121,123 includes a rudimentary crosspoint controller (XPC~ 122,124 which accepts commands to connect a specified inlet on the switch to a specified outlet by 2~ closing the proper crosspoint. The ~st and second stages' XPCs (121,123) are abb~eviated lSC (first stage controller) and 2SC (second stage controller) respectively.
On the right side of the CNet are 64 MANS controllers 140 (MANSCs) corresponding to and con~olling 64 disjoint subsets of the DNet, 30 partitioned by second stage outlet switches as described earlier. Since the controllers and their network are overlaid on the DNet and not integral to the data fabric, they could be replaced by a single controller in applications where transaction throughput is not critical.

-27- ~ 3~5~
3.2.2.2 Structure The CNet shown in FIG. 7 has special properties. It consists of three similar parts 130,134,135, corresponding to flows of messages from a MINT to a MANSC, orders from a MANSC to an XPC, and acknowledgments or negative 5 acknowledgments ACKs/NAKs fsom a MANSC to a MINT; acknowledge (ACK), negative acknowledge (NAK). Each of the networks 130,134 and 135 is a statistically multiplexed time-division switch, and comprises a bus 132, a group of interfaces 133 for buf~ering control data to a destination or from a source, and a bus arbiter cs~ntroller (BAC) 131. The bus arbiter controller controls the gating of 10 control data from an input to the bus. The address of the destination selects the output to which the bus is to be gated. The output is connected to a controller (network 130: a MANSC 140) or an interface (networks 131 and 132, interfaces similar to interface 133~. The request inputs and ACK/NAK responses are concentrated by control,data concentrators and distributors 136,138, each control 15 data concentrator concentrating data to or from four ~INTs. The control data concentrators and distributors simply buffer data from or to the MINTs. The interfaces 133 in the CNet handle statistical demultiplexing and multiplexing (steering and merging) of control messages. Note that the interconnections made by bus 132 for a given request message in the DNet are the same as those 20 requested in the CNet.
3.2.3 Connection Request Scenario The connection request scenario begins with a connection request message arriving at the,left of CNet 130 in a multiplexed stream on one of the message input links 137 from one of the data concentrators 136. This request includes the DNet 120 inlet and outlet to be connected. I n the CNet 130, the message is routed tc> the appropriate link 139 on the right side of the CNet according to the outlet to be connected, which is uniquely associated with a particular second stage swit h and therefore also with a particular MANS
controller 140.
This MANSC consults a static global directory (such as a E~OM) to find which first stage switches carry the requesting inlet. Independently of other MANSCs, it now checks dynamic local data to see whether the outlet is idle and any links from the proper first stage switches are idle. If the required resources are idle, the MANSC sends a crosspoint connect order to its own second stage 35 outlet switch plus another order to the proper first stage switch via network 134.
The latter order includes a header to route it to the correct first stage.

~ 31~9~5 - 2~ -This approach can achieve extremely high transaction throughput for several reasons. All network controllers can operate in parallel, independently of one another, and need not wait ~or one another's data or go-aheads. Each controller sees only those requests for which it is responsible and does not waste 5 time with other messages. Each con~oller's operations are inherently sequential and indepesldent functions and thus may be pipelined with more than one request in progress at a time.
The above scenario is not ~e only possibility. Variables to be considered include broadcast -vs- point-to-point inlets, oudets -vs- inlet-oriented 10 connection requests, rearrangement -vs- blocking-allowed operation, and disposition of blocked or busy colmect requests. Although these choices are already se~tled for MAN, all these options can be handled with the control topology presented, simply by changing the logic in the MANSCs.
3.2.4 Multistage Networks ~:
This control s~ructure is extendible to multistage Richards networks, where switches in a given stage are recursively implemented as two-stage networks. The resultant CNet is one in which connection requests pass sequentially through S-l controllers in an S-stage network, where again controllers are Iesponsible for disjoint subsets of the network and operate independently, thus 20 retaining the high throughput potendal.
3.3 Specific Design for MAN
In this section we first examine those system attributes that drive the design of the MANS. Next, the data and control networks are described. Finally the f~mctions of the MANS controller are discussed in detail, including design 25 tradeoffs that af~ect perforrnance.
3.3.1 System Attributes 3.3.1.1 Extemal and Internal Interfaces -FIG. 7 illustrates a prototypical fully-grown MANS composed of a DNet 121 with 1024 incoming and 1024 outgoing ILs and CNet 22 comprising 30 three control message Ttworks 130,133,134 each with 64 incoming and 64 outgoing message links. The ILs are partitioned into groups of 4, one group for each of 256 MINTs. The DNet is a two-stage networ~ of 64 first stage switches 121 and 64 second stage switchçs 123. Each switch includes an XPC 122 that takes cornmands to open and close crosspoints. For each of the 35 DNet's 64 second stages 123, there is an associated MANSC 140 with a dedicated control link to the XPC 124 in its second stage switch.

- 29 - 11 3 1 ~
Each control link and status link interfaces 4 MINTs to the CNet's left-to-Iight and right-to-left switch planes via 4:1 control data concentrators and distributors 136,138 which are also part of the CNet 22. These may be regarded either as remote concentrators in each 4-MINT group or as parts of their S associated 1:64 CNet 130,135 stages; in the present embodiment, they are pa3t of the CNet. A third 64x64 plane 134 of the CNet gives each MANSC 140 a dedicated right-to-left interface 133 with one link to each of the 64 lSCs 122.
Each MlNT 11 interfaces with the MANS 10 through its four ILs 12, its request signal to control data concentrator 136, and the acknowledge signal received back 10 from control data dis~ibutor 138.
Alternately, each CNet could have 256 instead of 64 ports on its MINT side, eliminating~the concentrators.
3.3.1.2 Size The MANS diagram in FIG. 7 represents a network needed to switch 15 data traffic for up to 20,000 EUSs. Each NIM is expected tO handle and concentrate the traffic of 10 to 20 EUSs onto a 150 Mb/s XL, giving about 1000 XLs (rounded off in binary to 1024). Each MINT serves 4 XLs for a total of 256 MINTs. Each MINT also handles 4 ILs, each with an input and an output termination on the DNet portion of the MANS. The data network thus has 1024 20 inputs and 1024 outputs. Internal DNet link sizing will be addressed laeer.
Failure-group size and other considerations lead to a DNet with 32 input links on each first stage switch 121, each of which links is connected to two such switches~ There are 16 outputs on each second stage switch 123 of the DNet. ~us, there are 64 of each type of switch and also 64 MANSCs 140 in the 25 CNet, one per second stage switch.
3.3.1.3 Traffic and Consolidation The "natural" EUS transactions of data to be switched vary in size by several orders of magnitude, from SUWUs of a few hundred bits to LUYVUs a megabit or more. As explained in Section 2.1.1, MAN breaks larger EUS
30 transactions lnto network transactions or packets of at most a few thousand bits each. But the MANS deals with the switch transaction, defined as the burst of data that passes through one MANS connection per one connect (and disconnect) requess Switch transactions can vary in size from a single SUWIJ to several LUWUs (many packets) for reasons about to be given. For the rest of Section 3, 35 "transaction" means "switch transaction" except as noted.

30 - ~ 3 ~
For a given total data rate through the MANS, the transaction throughput rate (transactions/second) varies inversely with the transaction size.
Thus, the smaller the transaction size, ~he greater the transaction throughput must be to maintain the data rate. This throughput is limited by the individual 5 throughputs of the MANSCs (whose connect/disconnect processing delays reduce the effective IL bandwidth) and also by concurrency resolution (waiting for busyoutlets). Each MANSC's overhead per transaction is of course independent of transaction size.
Although larger transactions reduce the transac~ion throughput 10 demands, they will add more delays to other transactions by holding outlets and fabric paths for longer times. A compromise is needed -- small transactions reduce blockin~ and concurrency delays, but laIge transactions ease the MANSC
and MINT workloads and improve the DNet duty cycle. The answer is to let MAN dynamically adjust its transacdon sizes under varying loads for the best 15 performance.
The DNet is large enough to handle the offered load, so the switching control complex's (SCC) throughput is the lirniting ~actor. Under light traffic, the switch transactions will be short, mostly single SUWUs and packets. As traffic levels increase so does the transaction rate. As the SCC transaction rate capacity 20 is approached, transaction sizes are dynamically increased to maintain the transaction rate just below the point where the SCC would overload. This is achieved automatically by the consolidation con~rol strategy, whereby each MINT
always transmits in a single switch transaction all aYailable SUWUs and packets targeted for a given destination, even though each burst may contain the whole or 2S parts of several EUS transactions. Further increases in traffic will increase the size, but not so much the number, of transactions. Thus fabric and IL utilization improve with load, while the SCC's workload incIeases only slightly. Section 3.3.3.2.1 explains the feedback mechanism that controls transaction size.
3.3.1.4 Performance Goals Nevertheless, MAN's data throughput depends on extremely high performance of individual SCC control elements. For example, each XPC 122,124 in the data switch will be ordered to set and clear at least 67,û0~
connections per second. Clearly, each request must be handled in at most a few mlcroseconds.

~ .

~ 3 ~

I,ikewise, the MANSCs' functions must be done quickly. We assume that these steps will be pipelined; then the sum of the step processing times will contribute to connect and disconnect delays, and the maximum of these step timeswill limit transaction throughput. We aim to hold the maximum and sum to a few 5 microseconds and a few tens of microseconds, respectively.
The resolution of the concurrency problem must also be quick and efficient. Busy/idle status of destination terminals will have to be determined in about 6 microseconds, and the control strategy must avoid burdening MANSCs with unfulfillable connection requests.
One final performance issue relates to the CNet itself. The network and its access links must run at high speeds (probably at least 10 Mb/s) to keepcontrol message transmit times small and so that links will run at low occupancies to minirnize the contention deIays from statistical multiplexing.
3.3 2 Data Network (l:)Net) The DNet is a Richards two-stage rearrangeably non-blocking broadcast network. This topology was chosen not so much for its broadcast capability, but becawse its two-stage structure allows the network to be partitioned into disjoint subsets for distributed control.
3.3,2~1 Desi~ratneters The capabilities of the Richards network derive from the assignment of inlets to multiple appearances on different first stage switches according to a definite pattern. The particular assignment pattern chosen, the number m of multiple appearances per inlet, the total number of inlets, and the number of links between first and secon~d stage switches determine the maximum number of outlets25 per second stage switch permitted for the network to be realTangeably non-blocking.
The DNet in FIG. 7 has 1024 inlets, each with two appearances on the first stage switches. There are two links between each first and second stage switch. These parameters along with the pattern of distributing the inlets ensure 30 that with 16 outlets per;second stage switch the network will be rearrangeably non-blocking for broadcast.
Since MAN does not use broadcast or rearrangement, those parameters not justified by failure-group or other considerations may be ch~mged as more experience is obtained. For example, if a failure group size of 32 were deemed 35 tolerable, each second stage switch could have 32 outputs, thus reducing the number of second stage switches by a factor of 2. Making such a change would 13~9~
- 3~ -depend on the ability of the SCC control elements each to handle twice as much traffic. In addition, blocking probabilities would increase and it would have to be determined that such an increase would not signlficantly detract from the perforrnance of the network.
I'he network has 64 first stage switches 121 and 64 second stage switches 123. Since each inlet has two appearances and there are two links between first and second stage switches, each first stage switch has 32 inlets and 128 outlets and each second stage has 128 inlets and 16 outlets.
3.3.2.2 Operation Since each inlet has two appearances and since there are two links between each first and second stage switch, any outlet switch can access any inlet on any one of four links. The association of inlets to links is algorithrmc and thus ma~ be computed or alternatively read from a table. The path hunt involves simply choosing an idle link (if one exists) from among the four link possibilities.
If none of the ~our links is idle, a re-attempt to make a connection is made later and is requested by the same MINT. Alternatively, existing connections could be re-arranged to remove the blocking condition, a simple procedure in a Richards network. However, rerouting a connection in midstrearn could introduce a phase glitch beyond the outlet circuit's ability to recover phase 20 and clock. ~us with present circuitry, it is preferable not to run the MANS as a rearrangeable switch.
Each switch in the DNet has an XPC 1'22,124 on the CNet, which receives messages from the MANSCs telling which crosspoints to operate. No high-level logic is perforrned by these controllers.
25 3.3.3 Control Network and MANS Controller Functions _ 3.3.3.1 ~ontrol Network (CNet) The CNet 130,134,135 briefly described earlier, interconnects the MINTs, MANSCs, and lSCs. It must carry three types of messages --connect/disconnect orders from MINTs to MANSCs using block 130, crosspoint 30 orders from MANSCs to lSCs using block 134, and ACKs and NAKs from MANSCs back to the MlNTs using block 135. The CNet shown in FIG. 7 has three corresponding planes ~-r sections. The private MANS 140--2SC 124 links are shown but are not considered part of the CNet as no switching is required~
In this embodiment, the 256 MINTs access the CNet in groups of 4, 3~ resulting in 64 input paths to and 64 output paths from the network. The bus elements in the control network perform merging and routing of message streams.

131 ~.9~

A request message from a MINT includes the ID of the outlet port to be connected or disconnected. Since the MANSCs are associated one to-one w;th second stage switches, this outlet specification identifies the proper MANSC to which the message is routed.
The MANSCs transmit acknowledgment (ACK), negative acknowledgment (NAK), and lSC command messages via the righ~-to-left portion of the CNet (blocks 134,135). These messages will also be formatted with header information to route the messages to the specified MrNTs and lSCs.
The CNet and its messages raise significant technical challenges.
10 Contention problems in the CNet may mirror those of the entire MANS, requiring their own concuIrency solution. These are apparent in the Control Network shown in FIG. 7. The control data concen~rators 136 from four lines into one interfacemay have contention where more than one message tlies to arrive at one time.
The data concentrators 136 haYe storage for one request from each of the four 15 connected MINTs, and the MlNTs ensure that consecutive re~uests are sent sufficiently far apart that the previous request from a MINT has already been passed on by the concentrator before the next arrives. The MlNTs time out if no acknowledgement of a request is received within a prespecified time.
AlteTnatively, the control data concentrators 136 could simply "OR" any requests20 received on any input to the outpu~; garbled requests would be ignored and not acknowledged, leading to a time out.
Functionally what is needed inside the blocks 130,134,135 is a micro-LAN specialized for tiny fixed-length packets and low contention and minimal delay. Ring nets are easy to interconnect, grow gracefully, and permit 25 simple tolcenless addldrop protocols, but they are ill-suited for so many closely packed nodes and have intolerable end-to-end delays.
Since the longest message (a MINT's connect order) has under 3~
bits, a parallel bus 132 serves as a CNet fabric that can send a complete message in one cycle. Its arbitration controller 131, in handling contention for the bus, 30 would automatically solve contention for the receivers. Bus components are duplicated for reliability (not shown).
3.3.3 2 MAN Switch Controller (~AN~C) Operations FMS. 8 and 9 show a flowchart of the MANSC's high level functions. Messages to each MANSC 140 include a connect/disconnect bit, 35 SUWU/packet bit, and the IDs of the MANS input and output ports involved.

13~g~s 3.3.3.2.1 Request Queues; Consolidation (Intake Section, FIG. 8) Since the rate of message arrivals at each MANSC 140 can exceed its message processlng rate, a MANSC provides entrance queues for its messages.
Connect and disconnect requests are handled separately. Connects are not S enqueued unless their re~quested outlets are idle.
Priority and regular pac.ket connect messages are provided separate queues 150,152 so that priority packets can be given higher priority. An entry from the regular packet queue 152 is processed only if the priority queue 150 isempty. This ~unimizes the priority packets' processing delays at the expense of 10 the regular packets', but it is estimated that pri~ty traffic will not usually be heavy enough to add much to packet delays. E~ven so, delays are likely to be more user-tolerable with the lower priority large da~a transactions than with priority transactions. Also, if a packet is one of many pieces of a LUWU, any given packet delay may have no final effect since end-to-end LUWU delay l5 depends only on the last packet.
Both the priority and regular packet queues are short, intended only to cover short term random fluctuations in message arr~vals. If the short-term rate of arrivals exceeds the MANSC's processing rate, the regular packet queue and perhaps the priority queue will ove-rflow. In such cases a control negative 20 acknowledge ~CNAK) is returned to the requesting MINT, indicating a MANSC
overload. This is no catastr~phe, but rather the feedback mechanism in the consolidation strategy that increases switch transaction sizes as traffic gets heavier.
Each MINT combines into one transaction all available packets targeted for a given DNet outlet. Thus, if a connection request by the MINT results in a 25 CNAK, the next request for the same destination may rep~sent more data to be shipped during the connection, provided more packets of the LUWUs have arrived at the MINT in the meantime. Consolidation need not always add to LUWU
transmission delay, since a LUWU's last packet might not be affected. This scheme dynamically increases effective packet t~ansaetion) sizes to accommodate 30 the processing capability of the MANS~s.
The priority queue is longer than the regular packet queue to reduce the odds of sending a priority CNAK due to random bursts of requests. Priority packets are less likely to benefit from consolidation than packets recombining into their original LUWUs; this supports the separate, high-priority queue. To ~orce 35 the MINTs to consolidate more packets, we may build the regular packet queue shorter than it "ought" to be. Simulations have indicated that a priority ~ueue of 4 ~ 3 ~
requests capacity and a regular queue of 8 requests capacity is appropriate. Thesizes of both queues affect system performance and can be fine-tuned with real experience with a system.
Priority is deterrnined by a priority indicator in the type of service 5 indication 623 (FM. 20). Voice packets are given priority because of their required low delay. In alternative arrangements, all single packet transactions (SUWUs) may be given priority. Because charges are likely to be higher for high priority service, users will be discouraged from demanding high priority servicefor the many packets of a long LU`WU.
10 3.3.3.2.2 Busy/Idle Check When a connect request first arrives at a MANSC, it is detected in test 153 which differentiates it from a disconnect request. The busy/idle status of the destina~on outlet is checked (test 154). If the destination is busy, a busy negative acknowledge (BNAK) is returned (action 156) to the requesting MlNT, 15 which will try again later. Test 158 selects the proper queue (priority or regular packet). The queue is tested (160,162) to see if it is full. If the specified queue is full, a CNAK (control negative acknowledge) is returned (action 164). Otherwise the request is enqueued in queue 150 or 152 and simultaneously the dest;nation is seized (rn~rked busy) (action 166 or 167). Note that an overworked (full queues~20 MANSC can still retuxn BNAKs, and that both BNAKs and CNAKs tend to increase transaction sizes through consolidation.
The busy/idle check and BNAK handle the concurrency problem. The penalty paid for this approach is that a MINT-to-MANS IL is unusable during the interval between a MINT's issuing a connect requesl for that IL and its receipt of 25 an ACK or BNAK. Also the CNet jarns up with BNAKs and failing requests under heavy MANS loads. Busy/idle checks must be done quickly so as not to degrade the connection request throughput and TL utilization; this explains the performance of a busy test before enqueuing. It may be desirable further to use separate hardware to pre-test outlets for concurrency. Such a procedure would 30 relieve the ~LANSCs and CNets from repeated BNAK requests, increase the successful request throughput, and permit the MANS to saturate at a higher percentage of its theoretical aggregate bandwidth.
3.3.3.2 3 Path Hunt - MANSC Service Section (FIG. 9) Priority block 168 g,ives highest priority to requests from disconnect 35 queue 170, lower priority to requests from the priolity queue 150, and lowestpriority to requests from the packet queue 152. When a connect request is - 36 - ~ 3 ~
unloaded from the priority or the regular packet queue, its requested outlet port has alread~ been seized earlier (action 166 or 167), and the MANSC hunts for a path through the DNet. This merely involves looking up first the two inlets to which the incoming IL is connected (action 172) to find the four links with access S to that incoming IL and checking their busy status (test 174). If all four are busy, a blocked-fabric NAK (fabric NAK or FNAK) fabric blocking negative acknowledge (FNAK) is re~urned to the requesting MINT, which will try the request again later (action 17B). Also the seized destination outlet is released(marked idle) (action 176). We expect FNAKs to be rare~
If the four links are not all busy, an idle one is chosen and seized, first a first stage inlet, then a link (action 180); both are marked busy (action 182).
The inlet and link choices are stored (action 184). Now the MANSC uses its dedicated control path to send a crosspoint connect order to the XPC in its associated second stage switch (action 188); this connects the chosen link to the 15 outlet. At ~he same time another crosspoint order is sent (via the right-to-left CNet plane 134) to the lSC taction 186) required to connect the link to the inlet port. Once this order arrives at the lSC (test 190), an ACK is returned to the originating MlNT (action 19~).
3.3.3.2.4 Disconnects To release network resources as quickly as possible, disconnect requests are handled separately from connect requests and at top priority. They have a separate queue 170, built 16 words long (sarne as the nurnber of outlets) so it can never overflow. A disconnect is detected in test 153 which receives requests from the MINT and separates connect from disconnect requests. The outlet is released and the request placed in disconnect queue 170 (action 193~.
Now a new connect request for this same outlet can be accepted even though the outlet is not yet physically disconnected. Due to its higher priority, the disconnect will tear down the switch connections before the new request tries to reconnect the outlet. Once enqueued,l a disconnect can always be executed. Only the outlet ID
30 is needed to identify the spent connection; the MANSC recalls this connection's choice of link and crosspoints from local memory (action 195), marks these linksidle (action 196) and sends the two XPC orders to release them (actions 186 and 188). Thereafter, test 190 controls the wai~ for an acknowledgment from the first stage controller and the ACK is sent to the MINT (action 192). If there is no 35 record of this connection, the MANSC returns a "Sanity NAK." The MANSC
senses status from the outlet's phase alignment and scramble circuit (PASC) 290 ~3~ ~9~

to verify that some data transfer took place.
3.3.3.2.5 Parallel Pipelining Except for seizure and release of resources, the above steps for one request are independent of other requests' steps in the same MANSC and thus are 5 pipelined to increase MANSC throughput. Still more power is achieved through parallel operations; the path hunt begins at the same time as the busy/idle check.
Note that the transaction rate depends on the longest step in a pipelined process, but the response time for one given transaction (from request to ACK or NAK) is the sum of the step times involved. The latter is improved by parallelism but not 10 by pipelining.
3.3.4 Error Detection and Dia~nosis Costly hardware, message bits, and time-wasting protocols to the CNet and its nodes to verify every little message are avoided. For example, eachcrosspoint order from a MANSC to an XPC does not require an echo of the 15 command or even an ACK in return. Instead, MANSCs does assume $hat rnessages arrive ~mcorrupted and are acted on correctly, until evidence to the contrary arrives from outside. Audits and cross-checks are enabled only when there is cause for suspicjion. The end users, NIMs and MINTs soon discover a defect in the MANS or its control complex and identify the subset of MANS ports 20 involved. Then the diagnostic task is to isolate the problem for repair and interim work-around.
Once a portion of the MANS is suspect, temporary auditing modes could be turned on to catch the guilty parties. For suspected lSCs and MANSC, these modes require use of the command ACKS and echoing. Special messages 25 such as crosspoint audits may also be passed through the CNet. This should be done while still carrying a light load of user tra~fic.
Before engaging dlese internal self-tests (or perhaps to eliminate them entirely), MAN can run expeIiments on the MANS to pinpoint the failed circuit, using the MINTs, ILs, and NIMs. For example, if 75% of the test SUWUs sent 30 from a given IL make it to a given outlet, we would conclude that one of the two links from one of that IL's two first stages is defective. (Note this test must be run under load, lest the deterministic MANSC always select the same link.) Further experiments can isolate that link. But if several MINTs are tested and none can send to a particular outlet, then that outlet is marked "out of service" to 35 all MINTs and suspicio!l is now focussed on that second stage and its MANSC.
If other oudets on that stage work, the fault is in the second stage's fabric. These 1 31~9~5 tests use the status lead from each of a MANSC's 16 PASC.
Coordinating the independent MINTs and NlMs to ron these tests requires a central intelligence with low-bandwidth message links to all MINTs and NIMs. Given inter-MINT connectivity (see FIG. 15), any MINT with the needed 5 firmware can take on a diagnostic task. NIMs must be involved anyway to tell whether test SUWUs reach their destinations. Of course any NIM on a working MINT can exchange messages with any other such NIM.
3.4 MAN Switch Controller FIG. 25 is a diagram of MANSC 140. This is the unit which sends 10 control instructions to data network 120 to set up or tear down circuit connections.
It receives orders from control network 130 via link 139 and sends acknowledgments both positive and negative back to the requesting MINTs 11 via control network 135. It also sends instructions to first s~age switch controllers via control network 134 to first stage switch controller 122 and directly to the second 15 stage controller 124 that is associated with the specific MANSC 140.
Inputs are received from inlet 139 at a request intake port 1402. They are processed by intake!control 14()4 to see if the requested outlet is busy. The outlet memory 1406 contains busy/idle indications of the outlets for which an MANSC 140 is responsible. If the outlet is idle a connect request is placed into20 one of two queues 150 and 152 previously described with respect to ~IG. 8. Ifthe request is for a disconnect, the request is placed in disconnect queue 170. The outlet map 1406 is updated to mark a disconnected outlet idle. The acknowledge response onit 1408 sends negative acknowledgments if a request is received with an error or if a connect request is made to a busy outlet or if the appropriate 25 queue 150 or 152 is full. Acknowledgment responses are sent via control network l35 back to the requesting MINT 11 via distributor 138. All of these actions are performed under the control of in~ake con~rol 1404.
Service control 1420 controls the setup of paths in data network 120 and the updating of outlet memory 1406 for those circumstances in which no path 30 is available in the data network between the requesting input link and an available output link. The intake control also updates outlet memory 1406 on connect requests so that a request which is already in the queue will block another request for the same output lillk.
Service contrcl 1420 examines requests in the three queues 150, 152, 35 and 170. Disconnect requests are always given the highest priority. For disconnect requests, the link memory 1424 and path memory 1426 are examined ~31~

to see which links should be made idle. The instructions for idling these links are sent to first stage switches from first stage switch order port 1428 and the instructions to second stage switches are sent from second stage switch order port 1430. Por connect requests, the static m~p 1422 is consulted to see which S links can be used to set up a path from the requesting input link to the requested output link. Link map 1424 is then consulted to see if appropriate links are available and if so these links are marked busy. Path memory 1426 is updated to show that this path has been set up so that on a subsequent disconnect order theappropriate links can be made idle. A11 of these actions are performed under the10 control of service control 1420.
Controllers 1420 and 1404 may be a single controller or separate controllers and may be program controlled or controlled by sequential logic.
There is a great need for a very high-speed operations in these controllers because of the high throughput demanded which makes a hard wired controller preferable.
15 3.~ Control Network Control message network 130 (FM. 7) takes outputs 137 from data concentrators 136 and transmits these outputs, representing connect or disconnect requests, to MAN switch controllers 140. Outputs of concentrators 136 are storedtemporarily in source registers 133. Bus access controller 131 polls these source 20 registers 133 to see if any have a request to be transmitted. Such requests are then placed on bus 132 whose output is stored temporarily in intermediate register 141. Bus access controller 131 then sends outputs from register 141 to the appropriate one of ~he MAN switch controllers 140 via link 139 by placing the output of register 141 on bus 142 connected to link 139. The action is 25 accomplished in three phases~ During the first phase, the output of register 133 is placèd on the bus 132, thence gated to register 141. During ~e second phase, theoutput of register 141 is placed on bus 142 and delivered to a MAN switch controller 140. l:)uring ithe third phase, the MAN switch controller signals thesource register 133 as to whether the controller has received the request; if so, 30 source register 133 can accept a new input from control data concentrator 136.
Otherwise, source register 133 retains the same request data and the bus access controller 131 will repeat the transmission later. The three phases may occur simultaneously for three separate requests. Control networks 134 and 135 operatein a fashion similar to control network 130.

~ 3 ~
3.S Summarv A structure to meet the large bandwidth and transaction throughput requirements for the MANS has been described. The data switch fabric is a two-stage Richards network, chosen because its low blocking probability permits a 5 parallel, pipelined distributed switch control complex (SCC). The SCC includesXPCs in all first and second stage switches, an intelligent controller MANSC with each second stage, and the CNet that ties the control p;eces together and links them to the MINTs.

4 MEMORY AND INTERFACF, MODULE
10The memory and interface module (MINT) provides receive interfaces for the external fiber-optic links, buffer memory, control for routing and link protocols, and transmitters to send collected data over the links to the MAN
switch. In the present design, each MINT serves four network interface modules (NIMs) and has four links to the switch. The MINT is a data switching module.
15 4.1 Basic Functions The basic functions of the MINT are to provide the following:
1. A fiber-optic receiver and link protocol handler for each NIM.
2. A link handler and transmitter for each link to the switch.
3. A buffer memo~y to accumulate packets awaiting transmission across the 20switch.
4. An interface to the controller for the switch to direct the setup and teardown of network paths.
S. Control for ad~ress translation, routing, making efficient use of the switch,orderly transmission of accumulated paGkets, and management of buffer 25memory.
6. An inter~ace for~operation, administration, and m~intenance of the overall system.
7. A control channel to each NIM for operation, administration, and maintenance functions.
30 4.2 Data Flow In order to understand the descriptions of the individual functional units that make up a MlNT, it is first necessary to have a basic understanding of the general flow of data and control. FIG. 10 shows an overall view of the MINT.Data enters the MINI on a high-speed (100-150 Mbit/s) data channel 3 from 35 each NIM. This data is in the form of packets, on the order of 8 Kilobits long, each with its own header containing routing information. The hardware allows for ~ 3 1 ~

packet sizes in increments of 512 bits to a maximum of 128 Kilobits. Small packet sizes, however, reduce throughput due to the per-packet processing required. Large maximum packet sizes result in wasted memoIy for transactions of less than a maximum size packee. The link terminates on an external link S handler 16 (XLH), which retains a copy of the pertinent header fields as it deposits the entire packet into the buffer memory. This header information, together with the buffer memory address and length, is then passed to the central control 20. The central control deter nines the destination NIM from the addressand adds this block to the list of blocks (if any) awaiting transmission to this10 same destination. The central control also sends a connection request to the switch controller if there is not already a request outstanding. When the central control receives an acknowledgement from the switch controller that a connectionrequest has been satisfied, the central control transmits the list of memory blocks to the proper internal link handler 17 (ILH). The ILH reads the stored data fromlS memory and transmits it at high speed (probably the same speed as the incoming links) to the MAN switch, which directs it to its destination. As the blocks aretransmitted, the ILEl informs the central control so that the blocks can be added to the list of free blocks available for use by the XLHs.
4.3 Memory Modules The buffer memory 18 (FIG. 4) of the MINT 11 satisfies three requirements:
1. The quantity of memory provides sufficient boffer space to hold the data accurnulated (for all destinations) while awaiting switch setups.
2. The memory bandwidth is adequate to support simultaneous activity on all eight links (four receiving and four transmitting).
3. The memory access provides for efficient strean~ing of data to and firom the link handlers.
4.3.1 Organization Because of the amount of memory required (Megabytes), it is 30 desirable to employ conventional high-density dynamic random access memory (DRAM) parts. Ihus~ high bandwidth can be achieved only by making the memory wide. The memory is therefore organized into 16 modules 201,...,202 which make up a composite 512~bit word. As will be seen below, memory accesses are organized in a synchronous fashion so that no module ever receives 35 successive requests without sufficient time to perform the reqoired cycles. The range of memory for one MINT 11 in a typical MAN applica~on is 16-64 -42- ~3~
Mbytes. The number is sensitive to the speed of application of flow control in overload situations.
4 3.2 Time Slot Assi~ners The time slot assigners 203,...,204 (TSAs) combine the functions of a S conventional DRAM controller and a specialized 8-channel DMA controller. Each receives read/write requests from logic associated with the Data Transport Ring 19 (see 4.4, below). Its setup commands come from dedicated control time slots on this same ring.
4~3.2.1 Control From a control viewpoint, the TSA appears as a set of registers as shown in FIG. 11. For;each XLH there is an associated address register 210 and count register 211. Each ILH also has address 213 and count 214 registers, but in addition has registers containing the next address 215 and count 216, thus allowing a series of blocks to be read from memory in a continuous s~eam with 15 no inter-block gaps. A special set of registers 220-226 allows the MINT's central control section to access any of the internal registers in the TSA or to perform a directed read or write of any particular word in memory. These registers includea write data register 220 and read data register 221, a memory address register 222, channel status register 223, error register 224, memory refresh row 20 address register 225, and diagnostic control register 226.
4.3.2.2 Operation In normal operation, the TSA 203 receives only four order types from the ring interface logic: (1) "write" requests for data received by an XLH, (2) "read" requests for an ILH, t3) "new address" commands issued by either an XLH
25 or an ILH, and (4) "idle cycle" indications which tell the TSA to perform a refresh cycle or other special operation. Each order is accompanied by the identity o~ the link handler involved and, in the case of "write" and "new address" requests, by32 bits of data.
For a "write" operation, the TSA 203 simply performs a memory 30 write cycle using the address from the register associated with the indicatedXLH 16 and the data provided by ~he ring interface logic. It then increments theaddress register and decrements the colmt register. The count register is used in this case only as a safety check since the XLH should provide a new address before overflowing the current block.

43 131~9~5 For a "read" operation, the TSA 203 must fLrst check whether the channel for this ILH is active. If it iS, the TSA performs a memory read cycle using the address from the register for this ILH 17 and presents the data to thering interface logic. It also increments the address register and decrements the5 count register. In any case, the TSA provides the interface logic with two "tag"
bits which indicate (1) no data available, (2) data available, (3) first word ofpacket available, or (4) last word of packet available. For case (4), the TSA will load the ILH's address 214 and count 213 registers from its "next address" 216 and "next count" 215 registers, provided that these registers have been loaded by 10 the ILH. If they have not, ~he TSA marks the channel "inactive."
From the above descriptions, the ~unction of a "new address"
operation can be inferred. The TSA 203 receives the link identity, a 24-bit address, and an 8-bit count. For an XLH 16, it simply loads the associated registers. In the case of an ILH 17, the TSA must check whether the channel is 15 active. If it is not, then the normal address 214 and count 213 registers are loaded and the channel is marked active. If the channel is currently active, then the "next address" 216 and "next count" 215 registers must be loaded instead of the noIrnal address and count registers.
In an alternative embodiment, the two tag bits are also stored in buffer 20 memory 201,...,202. Advantageously, this permits packet sizes that are not limited to being a multiple of the overall width of the mernory (512 bits). In addition, the ILH 17 need not provide the actual length of the packet when reading it, thus relieving the central control 20 of the need to pass along this information to the ILH.
25 4.4 Data Transport Ring It is the job of the Data Transport Ring 19 to calry cont~ol cornmands and high-speed data between the link handlers 16,17 and the memory modules 201,..,202. The ring provides sufficient bandwidth to allow all the lir~s to run simultaneously, but carefully apportions this bandwidth so that circuits 30 connecdng to ~he ling are never required to transfer data in high-speed bursts.
~nstead, a fixed ~me slot cycle is employed ~hat assigns slots to each circuit at well-spaced intervals. The use of this fixed cycle also means that source and destination addresses need not be caIried on the ring itself since they can be readily determined at any point by a properly synchronized counter.

- 44 ~ 9 ~ ~
4.4.1 Electlical Description The ring is i32 data bits wide and is clocked at 24 MHz. This bandwidth is sufficient ~o support data rates of up to 150 Mbit/s. In addition to the data bits, the rings eontains four parity bits, two tag bits, a sync bit to identify S the start of a superfiame, and a clock signal. Within the ring, single-ended ECL
circuitry is used for all signals except the clock, which is differential ECL. The ring interface logic provides connecting circuits with TTL-compatible signal levels.
4.42 Time Slot Sequencing Requirements In order to meet the above objectives, the time slot cycle is subject to a number of constraints:
1. During each complete cycle there must be a unique time slot for each combination of source and destination.
2. Each connecting circuit must see its data time slots appearing at reasonably regular intervals. Specifically, each circuit must have a certain minimum interval between its data time slots.
3. Each link handler must see its data time slots in numerical order by memory module number. (This is to avoid making the linlc handler shuf~e a 512-bit word.) 4. Each TSA must have a known interval du~ing which it can perform a refresh cycle or other miscellaneous memory operation.

5. Since the TSAs in the memory modules must examine every control time slot, there must also be a minimum interval between control time slots.
4.4.3 Time Slot Cxcle Table I shows one data frame of a timing cycle which meets ~ese requirements. One data frame consists of a total of 8û time slots, of which 64 are used for data and the remaining 16 for control. The table shows, for each memory module TSA the slot during which it receives data from each XLH to be written into memory and during which it must supply data that was read from 30 memory for each IL,H. Every fifth slot is a control time slot during which the indicated link handler broadcasts con~ol orders to all the TSAs. For the purposes of this table, XLHs and ILHs are numbered 0-3, and TSAs are numbered 0-15.
TSA 0, for example, during time slot 0 receives data from XLH 0 and must supply data ~or ILH 0. During slot 17, TSA 0 performs similar operations for 35 XLH 2 and ILH 2. Slot ~6 is used for XLEI 1 and ILH 1, and slot 63 is used for XLH 3 and ILH 3. The re~use of the same time slot gor reading and wxiting is ' 13~5~
permissible since XLHs never rçad from memory and ILHs never write, thus effectively doubling the data bandwidth of the ring.
The control time slots are assigned, in sequence, to the four XLHs, the four ILHs, and the central control (CC). With these nine entities sharing the 5 control time slots, the control frame is 45 time slots long. The 80-slot data frame and the 45-slot control frame come into alignment every 720 time slots. This period is the superframe and is marked by the superframe sync signal.
There is a subde synchronization condition that must also be met for the ILHs. The words of a block must be sent in sequence beginning with word 0, 10 regardless of where in the ring timing cycle the order was received. To assist in meeting this requirement, the ring interface circuitry provides a special "word 0"
sync signal for each ILH. For example, in the timing cycle of Table I a new address might be sent by ILH 0 during time slot 24 (its control time slot). It is necessary to ensure that TSA number 0 is the lirst TSA to act on this new address 15 (requirement 3 in sec~ion 4.4.2) even though the data time slots for reads from TSAs numbered S through 15 for ILH 0 immediately follow time slot 24.
Since the number of time slots in the super~rame, 720, exceeds the number of elements on the ring, 25, it is apparent that the logical time slots do not have a pennanent existence; each time slot is, in effect, created at a particular 20 physical location on the ring and propagates around the ring until it returns to this location, where it vanishes. The effective creation point is different for data time slots than for control time slots.

~3~49~

TA~LE I
RING TIM~ SLOT ASSIGNMENT
Write to From Read from To Control Time Slot TSA XLH TSA ILH Slot Source 02 13 2 1~ 2 09 ' XLHl 17 0 2 û 2 4 0 ~ 4 0 23 8 3 ~ 8 3 26 12 1 ~ 12 28 9 3 ~ 3 13~9~

29 ILHl 33 ,10 3 10 3 3~ 14 1 14 42 5 ~ 5 2 '10 0 10 0 54 XL~Il 11 ~ 11 0 57 8 2 : 8 2 - 48 - '`11 3 ~7 10 2 10 2 6'~ 1 3 1 3 74 ILHl 79 l:LH2 ~ 131~

4.4.3.1 Data Time Slots Data time slots can be considered to originate at the owning XLH. A
data time slot is used to calTy incoming data to its assigned memory module, at which point it is re-used to carry outgoing data to the corresponding ILH. Since5 XLHs never receive information from a da~a time slot, the ring can be considered to be logically broken (for data time slots only) between the ILHs and the XLHs.The two tag bits identify the contents of the data time slots as follows:

1 1 Empty 10 Data 01 First word of packet 00 Last word of packet The "first word of packet" is sent only by memory module 0 when it sends the first word of a packet to an ILH. The "last word of packet" indication is sent only lS by memory module 15 when it sends the end of a packet to an ILH.
4.4.3.2 Control Time Slots .
Control time slots originate and terminate at ~e station of central control 20 on the ring. The link handlers use their assigned control slots only to broadcast orders to the TSAs. The CC is assigned every ninth control time slot.
20 The TSAs receive orders from all control time slots and send responses back to the CC on the CC control time slot.
The two tag bits identify the contents of a con~ol time slot as follows:

1 1 Empty 10 Data (to or from CC) 01 Order 00 Address ~ count (from a link handler) 4.5 External Link Handler The principal function of the XLH is to terminate the incoming high-30 speed data channel from a NIM, deposit the data in the MINT's buffer memory, and pass the necessary informadon to the MINT's central control ~0 so that the data can be forwarded to its destination. In addition, the XLH terminates an ~ 3 ~
incoming low-speed control channel that is multiplexed on the fiber link. Some of the functions assigned to the low-speed control channel are the transmission of the NIM status and control of flow in the network. It should be noted that the XLH
is only terminating the incoming fiber from the NIM. Transmission to the NIM is 5 handled by the internal link handler and the phase alignment and scrarnbler circuit that will be described later. The XLH uses an onboard processor 268 to interfaceto the hardware of the MINT central control 20. The four 20 Mbit/sec links coming from this processor provide the connectivity to the central control section of the MINT. FIG. 12 shows an overall view of the XLH.
10 4.5.1 Link Interface The XLH contains the fiber optic receiver, clock recovery circuit and descrambler circuit needed to recover data from the fiber. After the clata clock is recovered (block 250) and the data descrambled (block 252) the data is then converted from serial to parallel and demultiplexed (block 254) into the high-15 speed data channel and the low-speed data channel. Low level protocol processing is then pe~formed on the data on the high-speed data channel (block 256) as described in 5. This results in a data stream consisting of only packet data. The stream of packet data then goes through a first-in-first-out (PIFO) queue 258 to a data steering circuit 260 which steers the header into the20 header FIFO 266 and sends the complete packet to the XLH's ring interface 262.
4.5.2 Rin~ Interface .
The ring interface 262 logic controls transfer of data from the packet FIFO 258 in the link interface to the MINT's buffer memory. It provides the following functions:
25 1. Establishing and maintaining synchronization with the ring's timing cycle.2. Transfer of data from ~e link interface FIFO to the proper ring time slots.
3. Sending a new address to the memo~y TSAs when the end of a packet is encountered.
It should be noted that resynchronization with the ring7s 16-word (per XLH) 30 timing cycle will ha~e to be performed dur~ng the processing of a packet whenever the link interface FIFO becomes temporarily empty. This will be a normal occurrence since the ring's bandwidth is higher than the link's transmission rate. The r~ng and TSA, however, are designed to accommodate gaps in the data stream. Thus, resynchronization consists simply of waiting for 35 data to become available and f~r the ring cycle to return to the proper word number, marking the intervening time slots "empty." For example, if the ~ 3 1 ~ 9 ~ ~

FIF;O 258 becomes empty when a word destined for the fifth memory module is needed, it is necessary to ensure that the next word actually sent goes to that memory module, in order to preserve the overall sequence.
4.5.3 Control S The con~ol portion of the XLH is responsible for replenishing the free block FIFO 270 and pa$sing the header information about each packet received to the MINT's central control 20 tFIG. 4).
4.5.3.1 Header Processing At the same time a packet is being transmitted on the ring, the header 10 of the packet is deposited in the header FIFO 266 that is subsequently read by the XLH processor 268. In this header are ~he source and destination address fields,which the central control will require for routing. In addition, the header checksum is ve~ified to~ensure tha~ these fields have not been corrupted. The header in~ormation is then packaged with a memory block descriptor (address and 15 length) and sent in a message to the central control 20 (FIG. 4).
4.5.3.2 Interaction wi~h Central Control There are only two basic interactions with the MINT's central control.
The XLH control attempts to keep i~s free-block FIFO 270 full with block addresses obtained from the memory manager, and it passes header information 20 and memory block descrip~ors to the central control so that the block can be routed to its destination. The block addresses are subsequently placed on the ring 19 by ring interface 262 upon receipt of the address from control sequencer 272. Both interactions with the central control are caTried out over links from XLH processor 268 to the appropriate sections of the central control.25 4.6 Internal Link Handler The internal link handler (ILH3 (EiIG. 133 is the first part of what can be considered a distributed link controller. At any instant in time this dis~ibuted link controller consists of a particular ILH, a path through the switch fabric and a particular Phase Alignment and Scrambler circuit 290 (PASC). The PASC is 30 described in section 6.1. It is the PASC that is actually responsible for thetransmission of optical signals over the return fiber of fiber pair 3 to the NIMfrom the MINT. The info~nation that is transmitted over the fiber comes from the MANS 10, which receives inputs at different times from the ILHs sending to that NIM. This kind of distributed link controller is necessary since path lengths 35 through the MAN swltch fabric are not all equal. 1~ the PASC did not align all of the information coming from different ILHs to the same reference clock, - 52 - 1 3 ~ 5 information received by the NIM would be continually changing its phase and bit alignment.
The combination of the ILH with the PASC is in many ways a mirror image of the XLH. The ILH rece;ves lists of block descriptors from the central 5 control, reads these blocks from memory, and transmits the data over the serial link to the switch. As data is received from memory, the associated block descriptor is sent to the central control's memory manager so that the block canbe returned to the free list.
The ILH differs from the XLH in that the ILH per~orrns no special 10 header processing, and the TSAs provide the ILH with additional pipelining sothat multiple blocks can be transmitted as a continuous stream if desired.
4.6.1 Link Interface The link interface 289 provides the serial transmitter for the data channel. Data is transmitted in a ~rame-synchronous forrnat compatible with the 15 link data format described in 5. Since the data is received from the ring interface 280 (see below) asynchronously and at a rate somewhat higher that the link's average data rate, the link interface contains a FIFO 282 to provide speed matching and frame synchronization. The data is received from MINT memory via data ring interface 280, stored in FIFO 282, is processed by level 1 and 2 20 protocol handler 286, and is transmitted to MAN switch 10 through the parallel to serial converter 288 within link interface 289.
4.6.2 E~in~ Interface The ring interface 280 logic controls the transfer of data from the MINT's buffer memory to the FIFO in the link interface. It provides the 25 following functions:
1. Establishing and'maintaining sync~ronization with the ring's timing cycle.
2. Trans~er of data from the ring to the link inter~ace FIFO during the proper ring time slots.
3. Notifying the control section when the last word of a packet (memory block) is received.
4. Sending a new address and count (if available) to the memory TSAs 203,...,204 (FIG. 10) when the last word of a packet is received and the condition of; the FIFO 282 is such that the new packet will not cause an overflow.
35 Unlike the XLH, the ILH relies on the TSAs to ensure that data words are received in sequence and with no gaps within a block. Thus, maintaining word ~ 31~9-~

synchronizatio n in this case consists simply of looking for unexpected empty data time slots.
4.6.3 Control The control portion of the ILH, controlled by sequencer 283 is 5 responsible for providing the ring interface with block descriptors received via the processor link interface 284 from the central control and stored therefrom in address FIFO 285, notifying the central control via the processor link interfacewhen blocks have been ~retrieved from memory, and notifying the central control 20 when transmission of the final block is complete.
10 4.6.3.1 Interaction with Central Control There are only three basic interactions with the M~'s central control:
1. Receiving lists of block descriptors.
2. Informing the memory manager of blocks that have been retrieved frorn memory.
3. Informing the switch request queue manager when all blocks have been transmitted.
In the present design, all of these interactions are carried out over Transputer links to the appropriate sections of the central control.
20 4.6.3 2 Interaction with TSAs Like the XLH, the ILH uses its control time slots to send block descriptors (address and lengths) to the TSAs. When the TSAs receive a descriptor from an ILH, however, they will immediately begin reading the block from memo~ and plac;ng the data on the ring. The length field from an ILH is 25 significant and deterrnines the number of words that will be read by each TSA before moving on to the next block. The TSAs also provide each ILH with registers to hold the next adclress and length, so that successive blocks can betransmitted without gaps. Flow control is the responsibility of the ILH, however, and a new descriptor should not be sent to the TSAs until there is enough room in 30 the packet FIFO 282 to compensate for reframing time and the diff~rence in transmission rates.
4.7 MlNT Central Control FIG. 14 is a block diagram of MINT centrat control 20, This central control is connected to the four XLH 16s of the MlNT, the ~our ILH 17s of the 35 MINT, to data concentrator 136 and distributor 138 of the switch control (SeeFIG. 7), and to an OA&M central control 352 shown in FIG. 15. The relationship ~ 3~ ~ 9 ~Q~
of the central control 20 with other units will first be discussed.
The M~NT central control communicates with XLH 16 to provide memory block addresses for use by the XLH in orcler to store incoming data in the MINT memory. XLH 16 communicates with the MINT central control to S provide the header of a packet to be stored in MINT memory, and the address where that packet is to be stored. Memory manager 302 of MINT central control 20 communicates with ILH 17 to receive information that memory has been released by an ILH because the message stored in those memory blocks has been delivered, so that the released memory can be reused.
When queue manager 311 recognizes that the first network unit arriving for a particular NIM has been queued in switch unit queue 314, which contains ~C) queues 316 for each possible destination NIM, queue manager 311 sends a request to switch setup control 313 to request a connection in MAN
switch 10 to that NIM. The request is stored in one of the queues 318 (priority)15 and 312 (regular) of switch setup control 313. Switch setup control 313 administers these requests according to their priority and sends requests to MANswitch 10, specifically to switch control data concentrator 136. For noImal loads, the queues 318 and 312 should be almost empty since requests can norrnally be made almost immediately and will generally be processed by the appropnate 20 MAN switch controller. For overload conditions, the queues 318 and 312 becomea means for deferring transrnission of lower priority packets while retaining the relatively fast transmission of priority packets. If experience so dictates, it may be desirable to move a request from the regular queue to the priority queue if a priority packet for that destination NIM is received. Requests queued in 2S queues 318 and 312 do n~t tie up an IL, an ILH, and an output link of circuitswitch 10; this is in contrast to requests in the queues 150,152 (FIG. 8) of an MAN switch controller~l40 (FIG. 7).
When switch setup control 313 recognizes that a connection has been established in switch 10, it notifies NIM queue manager 311. The ILH 17 30 receives data from a FIFO queue 31S in switch unit queue 314 from NIM queue manager 311 to identify a queue of the memory locations of data packets which may be transmitted to the circuit switch, and for each packet, a list of one or more ports on the NIM to which that packet is to be transmitted. NIM queue manager 311 then causes ILH 17 to prefix the port number(s) to each packet and 35 to transmit data for each packet from memory 18 to switch 10. The ILH then proceeds to transmit thè packets of the queue and when it has completed this task, -ss ~3~5~
notifies the switch setup control 313 that the connection in the circuit switch may be disconnected and notifies mernory manager 302 of the identity of the blocks of memory that can now be released because the data has been transmitted.
The MINT central control uses a plurality of high ~speed proc~ssors 5 each of which have one or more inputloutput ports. The specific processor usedin this implementation is the Transputer manufactured by INMOS Corporation.
This pr{)cessor has four inputloutout ports. Such a processor can meet the processing demands of the MINT cen~al control.
Packets come into the four XLHs 16. There are four XLH managers 10 305, source checkers 307, routers 309, and OA&M MINT processors 315, one corresponding to each XLH within the MINT; these processors, operating in parallel to process the data entering each XLH increase the total data processing capacity of the MINI' central control.
The header for each packet entering an XLH is transmitted along with 15 the address where that packet is being stored directly to an associated XLH
manager 305, if the header has passed the hardware check of the cyclic redundancy code tCRCj of the header performed by the XLH. If that CRC check fails, the packet is discarded by the XLH which recycles the allocated memory block. The XLH manager passes the header and the identity of allocated memory 20 for the packet to the source checker 307. The XLH manager recycles memory blocks if any of the source checker, router, or NIM queue manager find it impossible to transmit the packet to a destination. Recycled memory blocks get used before memory blocks allocated by the memory manager. Sol rce checker 307 checks whether the source of the packet is properly logged in and whether 25 that source has access to the virtual network of the packet. Source checker 307 passes information about the packet, including the packet address in MINT
memory, to router 309 which translates the packet group iden~ification, effectively a virtual network name, and the destination name of the packet in order to fin~l out which output link this packet should be sent on. Router 30~ passes the 3û idendfication of the output link to NIM queue manager 311 which identifies and chains packets received by the four XLHs of this MINT which are headed for a common output linlc. After the first packet to a NIM queue has been received, the NIM queue manager 311 sends a switch setup request to switch setup control 313 to request a connection to that NIM. NIM queue manager 311 chains these 35 packets in FIFO queues 316 of switch unit queue 314 so that when a switch connection is made in the circuit switch 10, all of these packets may be sent over -56- ~3~49~
that connection at one time. Output control signal disn~butor 138 of the switch control 22 replies with an acknowledgment when it has set up a connection. This acknowledgment is received by switch setup control 313 which informs NIM
queue manager 311. NIM queue manager 311 then informs ILH 17 of the list of 5 chained packets in order that ILH 17 may transmit all of these packets. When ILH 17 has completed the transmission of this set of chained packets o~er the circuit switch, it informs switch setup control 313 to request a disconnect of the connection in switch 10, and in-orms memory manager 301 that the memory which was used for storing the data of the message is now available for use for a 10 new message. Memory manager 301 sends this release information to memory distributor 303 which distributes memory to the various XLH managers 305 for allocating memory to the XLHs.
Source checker 307 also passes billing information to operation, administration and maintenance (OA&M) MINT processor 315 in order to perform 15 billing for that packet and to accumulate appropriate statistics for checking on the data flow within the MINT and, after combination with other statistics, in the MAN network. E~outer 309 also informs (OA&M) MINT processor 315 of the destination of the packet so that the OA&M MINT processor can keep track of data concerning packet destinations for subsequent traffic analysis. The output of 20 the four OA~M MINT processors 315 are sent to MINT OA&M monitor 317 which summarizes the data collected by the four OA&M MINT processors for subsequent transmission to OA&M central control 352 (FIG. 14).
MINT OA&M monitor 317 also receives information from OA&M
central control 352 for making changes via OA~M MINT processor 315 in the 25 router 309 data; these changes reflect additional terminals added to the network, the movement of logical terminals (i.e., terminals associated with a particular user) from one physical port to another, or the removal of physical terminals from thenetwork. Data is also provided from the OA&M central control 352 via the MINT operation, OA&M monitor and the OA&M MINT processor 315 to source 30 checker 307 for such data as a logical user's password and physical port as well as data concerning the privileges of each logical user.
4.8 MINT Ope ation, Administration, and Ma ntenance Control System FIG. 15 is a block diagram of the maintenance and control system of the MAN network. Operation, administration, and maintenance ~OA~M) 35 system 350 is connected to a plurality of OA&M central controls 352. These OA&M controls are each connected to a plurality of MINTs, and within each 57 1 3 ~
MINT, to the MINT OA&M monitor 317 of MINT central control 20. Since many of the messages from OA&M system 350 rnust be distributed to all the MINTs, the various OA&M central controls are interconnected by a data ring.
This data ring transmlts such data as the identification of the network interface 5 module, hence the identification of the output link, of each physical port that is added to the network so that this informa~ion may be stored in the router processors 309 of every MINT in the MAN hub.

5.1 Link Requirements The links in the MAN system are used to transmit packets between the EUS and the NIM (EUSL) (links 14) and between the NIM and the MAN
hub (XL) (links 3). Although the operation and the characteristics of the the data that is ~ansferred on these links varies slightly with the particular application, the format used on the links is the same. Having the formats be the same makes it 15 possible use common hardware and software.
The link format is designed to provide the following features.
1. It provides a high data rate packet channel.
2. It is compatible with the proposed Metrobus "OS-1" fo~nat.
3. Interfacing is easier because of the word oriented synchronous format.
20 4. It defines how "packets" are delimited.
5. It includes a CRC for an entire "packet" (and another for the header.) 6. The format insures transparency of the data within a "packet".
7. The format provides a low bandwidth channeil for flow control signaling 8. Additional low bandwidth channels can be added easily.
25 9. I)ata scrambling insures good transition density for cloclc recovery.
5.2 MAN Link Description and Reasonin~
From a performance point of view, ~e faster the links are the better MAN will perform. This desire to operate the links as fast as possible is tempered by the fact that ~aster links cost more. A reasonable tradeoff between 30 speed and cost is to use LED transmitters (like the AT&T ODL-200) and multimode fiber. The use of ODL-200 transmitters and receivers puts an upper limit on the link speed of about 200Mbit/sec. From the MAN architecture point of view, the exact data rate of the links is not important since MAN does not dosynchronous switching. The data rate for the MAN links was chosen to be the 35 same as the data rate of the Metrobus Lightwave System "OS-1" link. The Metrobus format is described in M. S. Schaefer: "Synchronous Optical Transmission Network ~or the Metrobus Lightwave Network", IEEE International Cornm~mications Conference, June 1987, Paper 30B.l.l. Another data rate (and fonnat) that could be used in MAN will come from the specifica~ion of SONET, a link layer protocol speciiied by Bell Communications Research Corp. for 150 S Mbi~lsec unchannelized links.
5.2.1 Level 1 Link Format The MAN network uses the low level link forrnat of Metrobus.
Information on the link is carried by a simple frame that is continuously repeated.
The frame consists of 88 - 16 bit words. The first word contains a frarning 10 sequence and 4 parity bits. In addition to this first word, three other words are overhead words. These overhead words, which are used ~or internode communications in the Metrobus implementation, are not used by MAN for the sake of Metrobus compatibility. The word oriented nature of the protocol makes using it much simpler. A simple 16 bit shift register with parallel load can be 15 used to transmit and a similar shift register with parallel read out can be used to receive. At the 146.432Mbit/sec. Iink data rate, a 16 bit word is transmitted orreceived every 109ns. This approach makes it possible to implement much of the link forrnatting hardware at conventional TTL clock rates. The word oriented nature of the protocol does put some restrictions on the way the link is used, 20 however~ To keep the complexity of the hardware reasonable it is necessary to use the bandwidth of the link in units of 16 bit words.
5 ~ 2 Level 2 Link Format The link is used to move "packets", the basic unit of informalion transfer in MAN. To identify packets, the format includes the specification of 25 "SYNC" words and an "IDLE" word. When no packets are being transmitted ~he "IDLE" word will fill all of the words that make up the primary channel bandwidth (words not reserved for other purposes). Pacl~ets are delimited by a leading START_SYNC and a trailing END SYNC word. This scheme works well as long as the words with special meanings are never contained in the data within 30 a packet. Since restricting the data that can be sent in a packet is an unreasonable restriction, a transparent data transfer technique must be used. MAN links employ a very simple word stufflng transparency technique. Within the packet data, any occurrence of a special meaning word, like the START_SYNC word, is preceded by another special word the "DLF" word. This word stuffing transparency was 35 chosen because of the slmplicity of ;mplementation. This protocol requires simpler, lower speed lo'gic than is required for bit stuffing protocols like HDLC.

1 3~

The technique itself is sim;lar to the time proven techniques used in IBM's BISYNC links. In addi~ion to the word stuffing used to ensure transparency, "FILL" words are inserted if the data rate of the source is slightly less than the link data rate.
S l'he last word in any packet is a cyclic redundancy check (CRC) word. This word is used to insure the that any corruption of the data in a packet can be detected. The CRC word is computed on all of the data in the packet, excluding any special words like "DLE" that may need to be inserted in the data stream for transparency or other reasons. The polynomial that is used to compute10 the CRC word is the CRC-16 standard.
To ensure good transition density for the optical receivers all of the data is scrambled (e.g., block 296, FIG. 13) prior to transmission. The scIambling makes it less likely that long sequences of ones or zeros will be transrnitted on the link even though ehey may be quite common in the data actually being transmitted. The scrambler and descrambler (e.g., block 252, FIG. 12) are well known in the art. The descrambler design is self synchronizing, which makes it possible to recover from occasional bit errors without having to restart the descrambler.
5.2.3 Low Speed Channels and Flow Control Not all of the payload words in the level 1 format are used for the level 2 format that carries packets. Additional channels Me included on the linkby dedicating particular words within the frame. These low rate channels 255,295(FIGS. 12 and 13) are used for MAN network control puIposes. A packet delimiting scheme similM to tha~ used on the prima~y data channel is used on 25 these low rate channels. The dedicated words that make up low rate channels can be ~her divided down into individual bits for very low bandwidth channels like the flow control channel. The flow control channel is used on the MAN EUSL
(between the EUS and the NIM) to provide hardware level flow control. The flow control channel (bit) from the NIM to the EUS, indicates to the EUS link 30 transmitter whether or not it is allowed to transmit more inforrnation. The design of the NIM is such that sufficient storage is available to absorb any data that is transmitted prior to the EUS transmitter actually stopping after flow control isasserted. Data transmission can be stopped either between packets or in the middle of a packet transmission. If it is between packets, the next packet will not 35 be sent until flow control is turned deasserted. 11~ flow control is asserted in the middle of a packe~, it is necessary to suspend data transmission immediately and 1 3 1 ~

start sending the "Special FILL" code word. This code word, like all others, is escaped with the "DLE" code word when it appears in the body of a packet.

The MAN switch, as described in section 3, is an asynchronous space 5 switch fabric with a very fast setup controller. The data fabric of the switch is design to reliably propagate digital signals with data rates from DC to in excess of 20ûMbits/second. Since many paths can simultaneously exist through the fabric, the aggregate bandwidth requirements of the MAN hub can be easily meet by the fabric. This simple data fabric is not without drawbacks however. Because of 10 mechanical and electrical constraints in implementing the fabric, it is not possible for all paths through the switch to incur the same amount of delay~ Because the variations in path delay between different paths may be much greater than the bit time of the data going through the swi~ch, it is not possible to do synchronous switching. Any time that a path is setLIp from a particular ILH in a MINT to an 15 output port of the switch, there is no guarantee that data transrnitted over that path will have the same relative phase as the data transmitted over a previous path through the switch. To use this high bandwidth switch it is therefore necessary eo very quickly synchronize data coming out of a switch port to the clock being used for the synchronous lin~ to the NIM.
20 6.1 The Phase Ali nment and Scrambler Circuit (PASC) The unit that must do the synchronization of data coming from the switch and drive the outgoing link to the NIM called the Phase Alignment and Scrambler Circuit (PASC) (block 290, FIG. 13). Since the ILHs and the PASC
circuits are all part of the MAN hub, it is possible to distribute the same master 25 clock to all of them. This has several advantages. :By using the same clock reference in the PASC as is used to transmit data from the ILH, one can be sure that data can not be coming into the PASC any faster than it is being moved out of it over the link. This eliminates the need for large FIFOs and elaborate elastic store controllers in the PASC. The fact that the bit rate of all data that comes into 30 a PASC is exactly the the same makes the synchronization easier.
The ILH ani~ the PASC can be thought of as a distributed link handler for the format described in the previous section. The ILH crea$es the basic framing pattern into which the data is inserted and transmits it through the fabric to a PASC. The PASC aligns this framing pattern with its own framing pattern, 35 merges in the lvw speed con$rol channel and then scrambles the data for transmission.

~31~

The PASC synchronizes the incoming data to the reference clock by inserting an appropriate amount of delay into the data path. For this to work the ILH must be transmitting each frame with a reference clock that is slightly advanced from the reference clock used by the PASC. The number of bit times of S advance that the ILH requires is determined by the actual minimum delay that may be incurred in getting from the ILH to the PASC. The amount of delay that the PASC must be capable of inserting into the data path is dependent on the possible variation in path delays that may occur for different paths through theswitch.
FIG~ 23 is a block diagram of an illustrative ernbodiment of the invention. Unaligned data enters a tapped delay line 1()01. The various taps of the delay line are clocked into edge sampling latches lQ03,...,1005 by a signal that is 180 degrees out of phase with the reference clock (REFCLK) and is designated REFCLK . The outputs of the edge sampling latches feed selection logic 15 unit 1007 whose output is used to control a selector 1013 described below.
Selection logic 1007 includes a set of internal latches for repeating the state of latches 1003,...,1005. The selection logic includes a priority circuit connected to these internal latches, for selecting the highest rank order input which caTries a logical "one". The output is a coded identification of this selected inpu~. The 20 selection logic 1007 has two gating signals: a clear signal and a signal from all of a group of internal latches of the selection logic. Between data streams, the clear signal goes to a zero state causing the internal latches to accept new inputs. After the first "one" input has been received ~rom the edge sampling latches 1003,...,100S in~ response to the first pulse of a data stream, the state of the 25 transparent latches is maintained until the clear signal goes back to the zero state.
The clear signal is set by out of band circuitry which recogni7es the presence of a data stream.
The output of the tapped delay line also goes to a series of data latches 1009,...,1011. The input to the data latches is clocked by the reference30 clock. The outputs of the data latches 1009,...,1011 are the inpues to selector circuit 1013 which selects the output of one of these data latches based on the input from selection logic 1007 and connects this output to the output of the selector 1013, which is the bit aligned data stream as labeled on FIG. 23.
A~ter the bits have been aligned, they are fed into a shift register (not 35 shown) with tapped outputs to feed the driver XL3. This is to allow data streams to be transmitted synchronously starting at sixteen bit boundaries. The operation 131~5 - ~2 -of the shift register and auxiliary circuitry is substantially the same as that of the tapped delay line arrangement.
The selection logic is implemented in ~ ommercially aYailable priority selection circuits. The selector is simply a one out of eight selector con~rolled by 5 the output of the selection logic. If it is necessary to have a finer alignment circuit using a one of sixteen selection, this can be readily implemented using the same principles. The arrangement described herein appears to be especially attractive in situations where there is a common source clock and where the length of each data stream is limited. The common source clock is required since the 10 clock is not derived from the incoming signal, but is, in fact, used to gate an incoming signal appropriately. The limitation on the length of the block is required since a particular gating selection is maintained for the entire block so that if the block length were too long, any substantial amount of phase wandering would cause synchronism to be lost and bits to be dropped.
While in the present embodiment, the signal is passed through a tapped delay line and is sampled by the clock and inverse clock, the alternativearrangement of passing the clock through a tapped clelay line and using dle delayed clocks to sample the signal could also be used in some applications.
6.2 Clock Distribution The MAN hub operation is very dependent on the use of a single master reference clock for all of the ILH and PASC units in the system. The master clock must be distributed accurately and reliably to all of the units. Inaddition to the basic clock frequency that must be distributed, the frame start pulse must be distributed to the PASC and an advanced frame start pulse must be 25 distributed to the ILH. ~All of these functions are handled by using a sin~le clock distribution link (fiber or twisted pair) going to each unit.
The in~ormation` $hat is carried on these clock distribution links comes from a single clock source. This information can be split in the electrical and/or optical domain and transmitted to as many destinations as necessary. There is no30 attempt to keep the information on all of the clock distribution links exacdy in phase since ~e ILH and PASC are capable of correcting for phase differences no matter what the reason for this difference. The inforrnation that is transmitted is simply alternating ones and zeros with two exceptions. The occurrence of two ones in a row indicates an advanced frame pulse and the occurrence of two zeroes35 in a row indicates a normal frame pulse. Each board that terminates one of these clock distribution links contains a clock recovery module. The clock recovery - 63 - 1 3 ~
module is the same as that used ~or the links themselves. The clock recovery module will provide a very stable bit clock while addi~ional logic extracts the appropriate frame or advanced frame from the data itself. Since the clock recovery modules will continue to oscillate at the correct frequency even without 5 bit transitions for several bit times, even the unlikely occurrence of a bit error will not affect the clock frequency. 1'he logic that looks for the frame or advanced frame signal can also be made tolerant of errors since it is known that the frame pulses are periodic and extraneous pulses caused by bit errors can be ignored.

10 7.1 Overview The network interface module (NIM) connects one or more end user system links (EUSL) to one MAN external link (XL). In so doing, the NIM
performs concentration and demultiplexing of network transaction units (i.e.
packets and SUWUs), as well as insuring source identification integrity by affixing 15 a physical "source port number" to each outgoing packet. The latter function, in combination with the network registration service described in 2.4, prevents a user from masquerading as another for the p~pose of gaining access to unauthorized netw~rk-provided services. The NIM thereby represents the boundary of the MAN network proper; NIMs are owned by the network provider, 20 while UIMs (described in 8) are owned by the users themselves.
This section describes the basic functions of the NIM in more detail, and presents the NIM architecture.
7.2 Basic Functions The NIM must perform the following basic functions:
2S EUS Link interfacin~ ne or more interfaces must be provided to EUS link(s) (see 2~2.5). The downstream link (i.e. from ND!~ to UIM) consists of a data channel and an out-of-band channel used by the NIM to flow control the upstream link when NIM input buffers become full. Because the downstream link is not ~qow controlled, the flow control channel on the upstream link is unused. The 30 Data and Header Checkl Sequences (DCS, HCS) are generated by the UIM on the upstream link, and checked by the UIM on the downstream link.
External Link interfa i~ The XL (~ 2.2.6) is very similar to the EUSL, but lacksDCS checking and generation on both ends. This is to allow erroneous, but still potentially useful data to be delivered to the UIM. The destination port numbers35 in network transaction units arriving on the downstream XL are checked by the NIM, with illegal values resulting in dropped data.

- 64 - 1 3 ~
Concentrat;on and demultiplexing. Network transaction units arriving on the EUSLs contend for and are statistically multiplexed to the outgoing XL. Those arriving on the XL are routed to the appropriate EUSL by mapping the destinationport number to one or more EIJS links.
5 Source port identification. The port number of the source U[M is prepended to each network transaction unit going upstream by port number generator 403 (FiG. 16). This port number will be checked against the MAN address by the MINT to prevent unauthorized access to services (including the most basic data transport service) by "imposters".
10 7.3 NIM Architecture and Qperation The architecture of the NIM is depicted in FIG. 16. The followin~
subsections briefly describe the operation of the NIM.
7.3.1 Upstream Operation Incom~ng network transaction units are received from the UIMs at 15 their EUSL interface 400 receivers 402, are converted to words in serial to parallel conver~ers 404 and are accumulated in FIFO buffers 94. Each EUSL interface is connected to the NIM transmit bus 95, which consists of a parallel data path, and various signals for bus arbitration and clocking. When a network transaction unit has been buffered, the EUSL interface 400 arbitrates for access to the transmit 20 bus 95. Arbitration proceeds in parallel with data transmission on the bus. When the current data transmission is complete, the bus arbiter awards bus ownership to one of the competing EUSL interfaces, which begins transmission. For each transaction, the EUSL port number, inserted at the beginning of each packet by port number generator 403, is transmitted first, followed by the network 25 transaction unit. Within an XL interface ~140, the XL transmitter 96 provides the bus clock, and performs parallel to seIial conversion 442 and data transmission on the upstream XL 3.
7.3.2 Downstream Operation Network transaetion units arriving ~om the MINT on the downstream 30 XI, 3 are received within XL interface 440 by the XL receiver 446, which is connected via serial to parallel converter 448 to the NIM receive bus 430. The receive bus is similar to, but independent of the transmit bus. Also connected to the receive bus via a parallel to serial converter 408 are the EUSL interface transmitters 410. The XL receiver perforrns s~ial to parallel conversion, provides 35 the receive bus clock, and sources the incoming data onto ~he bus. Each EUSL
interface decodes the E~USL port number associated wi~h the data, and forwards - 65 - 1 3 ~
the data to i~s EUSL if appropriate. More than one EUSL interface may forward the data if required, as in a broadcast or multicast operation. Each decoder 409checks the receive bus 430 while port number(s) are being transmitted to see if the following packet is destined for the end user of this EUSL interface 400; if so, 5 the packet is forwarded to transmitter 410 for delivery to an EUSL 14. IllegalEUSL port numbers (e.g. violations of the error coding scheme) result in the data being dropped (i.e. nat forwarded by any EUSL interface). Decode block 409 is used to gate inforrnation destined for a particular EUS link from transmit bus 95 to the parallel/serial converter 408 and transmitter 410.
lû 8 INTEREACING TO MAN
8.1 Overview A user interface module (UIM) consists of the hardware and software necessary to connect one or more end user systems (EUS), local area networks (LAN), or dedicated point-to-point links to a single MAN end user system link 15 (EUSL) 14. Throughout this section, the term EUS will be used to generically refer to any of these network end user systems. Clearly, a portion of the UIM
used to connect a particular type of EUS to MAN is dependent on the architectureof that EUS, as well as the desired performance, flexibility, and cost of the implementation. Some of the functions provided by a UIM, however, must be 20 provided by every UIM in the system. It is therefore convenient to view the architecture of a UIM as having two dis~inct halves: the network interface, which provides the EUS-independent functional;ty, and the EUS interface, which implements the remainder of the UIM functions for the particular type of EUS
bein~ connected.
Not all EUSs will require the performance inherent in a dedicated external link. The concentration provided by a NIM tdescribed in 7) is an appropriate way to provide access to a number of EUSs which have stringent response time requirements along with the instantaneous I/O bandwidth necessary to effectively utilize the full ~LAN data rate, but which do not generate the 30 volume of traffic necessary to efficiently load the XL. Similarly, several EUSs or LANs could be connected to the same UIM via some intermediate link (or the LANs themselves). In this scenario, the UIM acts as a multiplexer by providing several EUS (actually LAN or link) inte~faces to go with one network interface.
This method is well suited to EUSs which do not allow direct connections to their 3S system busses, and which provide only a link connection that is itself limited in bandwidth. End users can provide their multiplexing or concentration at a UIM

- ~

1 3 ~

and MAN can provide further multiplexing or concentration at the NIM.
This section examines the architectures of both the network interface and EUS interface halves of the UIM. The functions provided by the network interface are described, and the architecture is presented. The heterogeneity of5 EUSs that may be connected to MAN does not allow such a generic treatment of the EUS interfaces. Instead, the EUS interface design options are explored, and a specific exarnple of an EUS is used to illustrate one possible EUS interface design.
8.2 UIM - Network Interface The UIM network inter~ace implements the EUS-independent functions of the UIM. Fach network interface connects one or more EUS
interfaces to a single MAN EUSL.
8.201 Basic Functions The UIM network interface must per~orm the following functions:
15 EUS Link interfacing. The interface to the EUS Link includes an optical transmitter and receiver, along with the hardware necessary to perform the link level -functions required by the EUSL (e.g. CRC generation and checking, data fo~matting, etc.).
Data buffer-i-n~ S:)utgoing network transaction units (i.e. packets and SUWUs) 20 must be buffered so that they may be transmitted on the fast network link without gaps. Incoming network transaction units are buffered for purposes of speed m;~tching and level three ~and above) protocol processing.
Buffer memory mana~ement. The packets of one LUWU may arrive at the receive UIM interleaved with those of another LUWU. In order to support this concurrent 25 recepdon of several LUWUs, the network interface must manage its receive buffer memory in a dynamic fashion, allowing incoming packets to be chained together into LUWUs as they arrive.
Protocol processing. Outgoing LUWUs rnust be fragmented into packets for transmission into the network. Similarly, incoming packets must be recombined 30 into LUWUs for delivery to the receiving process within the EUS.
8.2.2 Architectural Options Clearly, all of the funcdons enumerated in the previous subsection must be performed in order to interface any EUS to a MAN EUSL. However, some architeetural decisions must be made regarding where these functions are 35 perforrned; i~e., whether they are internal or external to the host itself.

1 3 ~

The first two fimctions must be located external to the host, although for different reasons. The fi~st and lowest level function, that of interfacing to the MAN EUS Link, must be implemented externally simply because it consists of special purpose hardware which is not part of a generic EUS. The EUS link 5 interface simply appears as a bidirectional I/O port to the remainder of the UIM
network interface. On the other hand, the second function, data buffering, cannot be implemented in existing host memory because the bandwidth requirements are too stringent. On reception, the network interface must be able to buffer incoming packets or SUWUs bacl~-to-back at the full network data rate (150 Mb/s). This 10 data rate is such that it is genelally impossible to deposit incoming packetsdirectly into EUS memory. Similar bandwidth constraints apply to packet and SUVVU transmission as well, since they must be completely buffered and then transmitted at the full 150 Mb/s rate. These constraints make it desirable to provide the necessary buffer memory external to the EUS. It should be noted that15 while FIFO memory will su~fice to provide the necessary speed matching for transmission, the lack of flow control on reception along with the interlea~dng of received packets necessitate that a larger amount of random access memory be provided as receive buffer memory. For MAN, the size of receive buffer memory may range from 256 Kbytes to 1 Mbyte. The particular size depends on the 20 interrupt latency of the host and on the maximum size LUWU allowed by the host software.
The final two functions involve processing, which could conceivably be performed by the host processor itself. The third function, buffer memory management, involves the tirnely allocation and deallocation of blocks of receive 25 buffer memory. The latency requirement associated with the allocation opeI~tion is stringent, due once more to the high data rates and the possibili~y of packets arriving back-to-back. However, this can be alleviated (for reasonable burst sizes) by pre-allocating several blocks of memory. It is possible, therefore, for the host processor to manage the receive packet buffers. Similarly, the host processor may 30 or may not assume the burden of the fourth function, that of MAN protocol processing.
The location of these final two functions determines the level at which the EUS connects to the UIM. If the host CPU assumes the burden for packet buffer memory management and MAN protocol processing (the "local"
35 configuration), then the unit of data transferred across the EUS interface is a packet, and the host is responsible ~or fragmenting and recombining LUWUs. If, 131~

on the other hand, those functions are off-loaded to another processor in the UIM, the front end p-rocessor (FEP) configuration, the unit of data transferred across the EUS interface is a LUWU. While in theory, subject to interleaving constraints atthe EUS interface, the unit of data transferred may be any amount less than or 5 equal to the en~e LUWU, and the units delivered by the transmitter need not bethe same size as those accepted by the receiver, for a general and uniform solution, useful for a variety of lEUSs, the LUWU is to be preferred as the basic unit. The FEP configuration offloads the majority of the processing burden from the host CPU, as well as providing for a higher level EUS interface, thereby 10 hidhlg the details of network operation from the host. With the FEP, the hostknows only about I,UWUs, and can control their transmission and reception at a higher, less CPU intensive level.
Although a lower cost interface is possible utilizing the local configuration, the network interface architecture described in the following section 15 is a FEP configuration more characteristic of that required by some of the high performance EUS that are natural users of a MAN network. An additional reason for choosing the FEP configuration initially is that it is better suited for interfacing MAN to a LAN such as ETHERNET, in which case there is no "host CPU" to provide buffer memory management and protocol processing.
20 8.2~3 Network Interface Architecture The architecture of the UIM network interface is depicted in FIG. 17.
The following subsections briefly describe the operation of the UIM network interface by presenting scenarios for the ~ransmission and reception of data. AnFEP-type architecture is employed, i.e., receive buffer memory management and 25 MAN network layer protocol processing are performed external to the host CPU
of the EUS.
8.2.3.1 Transmission of Data The main responsibilities of the network interface on t~ansmission are to fragment the arbitrar~ sized transmit user work units ~UWUs) into packets (if30 necessary), encapsulate the user data in the MAN header and trailer, and transmit the data to the network. To begin transmission, a message from the EUS
requesting transmission of a LUWU traverses the EUS interface and is handled by network interface processing 450, which also implements memory management and protocol processing functions. For each packet, the protocol processor portion 35 of the interface processing 450 formulates a header and writes it into the transmit F~FO 15. Data for that packet is then transferred across the EUS interface 451 ~ 3 1L ~

into the transmit FIFO 15 within link handler 460. When the packet is completelybuffered, the link handler 460 transmits it onto the MAN EUS link using transmitter 454, followed by the ~ailer, which was computed by the link handler 460. The link is flow controlled by the NIM IO ensure that the NIM
5 packet buffers do not overflow. This transmission process is repeated for eachpacket. The transmit FIFO 15 contains space for two maximum length packets so that packet transmission may occur at the maximum rate. The user is notified viathe EUS interface 451 when the transmission is complete.
8.2.3.2 Reception of Data Incoming data is received by receiver 458 and loaded at the 150 MB/s link rate into elastic buffer 462. Dual-ported video RAM is udlized for the receive buff~r memory 90, and the data is unloaded from the elastic buffer and loaded into the shift register 464 of receive buffer memory 90 via its serial access port. Each packet is then transferred from the shift register into the main memory 15 aTray 466 of the receivè buffer memory under the control of ~e receiver DMA
sequencer 452. The block addresses used to perform these transfers are provided by the network interface processing arrangement 450 of UIM 13 via the buffer memory controller 456, which bu~fers a small number of addresses in hardware to relieve the strict latency requirements which would otherwise by imposed by 20 back-to-back SUWUs. Block 450 is composed of blocks 530, 540, 542, 550, 552, SSd" 556, 558, 560, and 562 of FIG. 19. Because the network interface processinghas direct access to the buf-fer memory via its random access port, headers are not stripped off; rather they are placed into buffer memory along with the data. Thereceive queue manager 558 within 450 handles the headers and, with input from 25 the memory manager 550, keeps track of the various SUWUs and LUWUs as ehey a~ive. The EUS is notified of the arrival of data by the network interface processing arrangement 450 via the EUS interface. The details of how data is delivered to the EUS are a function of the particular EUS interface being employed, and are described, for example, in section 8.3.3.2.
30 8.3 UIM - EUS InteIfaces 8.3.1 Philosophy This section describes the "half" of the network interface that is EUS
dependent. The basic function of the EUS interface is ~he delivery of data between the EUS memory and the UIM network interface, in both directions.
35 Each particular EUS interface will define the protocol to effect delivery, the format of data and control messages, and the physical path for control and data.

Each side of the interface has to implement a flow control mechanism to protect itself from being overrun. The EUS must be able to control its own memory and the flow of data into it from the network, and the network has to be able to protect itself as well. Only at this basic functional level is it possible to talk 5 about commonality in EUS interfaces. EUS interfaces will be different because of EIJS hardware and system software differences. The needs of the applications using the network, coupled with the capabilities of the EUS, will also force interface design decisions dealing with performance and flexibility. There will be numerous interface choices even for a single type of ElJS.
This se~ of choices means that the interface hardware can range from simple designs with few components to complex designs including sophisticated buffering and memory management schemes. Control functions in the interface can range from simple E3US interfaces to handling network level 3 protocols and even higher level protocols for distributed applications. Software in the EUS can 15 also range from straightforward data transmission schemes that fit underneathexisting networking software, to more extensive new EUS software that would allow very flexible uses of the network or allow the highest performance that the network has to offer. These interfaces musL be tailored to the specific existingEUS hardware and software systems, but there must also be an analysis of thç
20 cost of interface features in comparison to the benefits they would deliver to the network applications running in these EUSs.
8.3.2 EUS Interface Design Options The tradeoff between a front end processor (FEP) and EUS processing is one example of different interface approaches to accomplish the same basic 25 function. Consider variations in receive buffering. A specialized EUS
architecture with a high perfolmance system ~us could receive network packe~
messages directly from the network links. However, usually the interface will atleast buffer packet messages as they come off the link, before they are delivered into EUS memory. NoImally EUSs, either transmitting to or receiving from the 30 network, do not know (or want to know) anything about the internal packet message. In that case, the receiving, interface rnight have to buffer multiple paclcets that come from the LUWU of data that is the natural sized transrnissioaunit between the transmit and receive EUSs. Each one of these three receive buffering situations is possible and each would require a significantly di~ferent 35 EUS interface to transfer data into the EUS memory. If the EUS has a particular need to process network packet messages and has the processing power and system bus perforrnance to devote to that task then the EUS dependent portion ofthe network interface would be simple. However, often it will be desirable to off-load that processing,into the EIIS interface and improve the EUS performance.
Different transmit buffering approaches also illustrate the tradeoff 5 between FEP and EUS processing. For a specialized application, an EUS with high performance processor and bus could send network packet messages directly into the network. But if the application used EUS transaction sizes that were much larger that the packet message size, it might take too much of the EUS
processing to produce packet messages on its own. An FEP could offload that 10 work of doing this level 3 network protocol formatting. This would also be the case where the EUS wishes to be independent of the internal network message size, or where it has a diverse set of network applications with a great valiation in transmission size.
Depending on the hardware architecture of the EUS, and the level of 15 performance desired, there is the choice betwçen prograrnmed I/O and DMA to move data between EUS memo~y and the network interface. In the prograrnmed I/O approach, probably both control and data will move over the same physical path. In the DMA approach there will be some kind of shared memory inte~face to move control information in an FUS interfacing protocol, and a DMA
20 controller in dle EUS interface to move data between buffer memory and EUS
memory over the EUS system bus without using EUS processor cycles.
There are several alternatives that exist for the location of EUS
boffering for network data. The data could be buffered on a front end processor network controller circuit board with its own private memory. This memory can 25 ~e connected to the EUS by busses using DMA transfer or dual ported memory accessed via a bus or dual ported memory located on the C:PU side of a bus usingprivate busses. The application now must access the data. Various techniques areavailable; some involve~ mapping the end user work space directly to the addressspace used by dle UIM to store the data. Other techniques require the operating 30 system to further buffer the data and recopy into the user's private address space.
Options exist in writing ~e driver level software in the EUS that is responsible for moving control and data inforrnation over the interface. The driver could also implement the EUS interface protocol processing as well as just moving bits over the interface. For the driver to still run efficiently the protocol 35 processing in the driver might not be very ~exible. For more flexibility based on a par~cular ~pplication, the EUS interface protocol processing could be moved up -72- ' 131~9~
to a higher level. Closer to the application, more intelligence could be applied to the interface decisions, at the expense of more EUS processing time. The EUS
could implement various interface protocol approaches for delivery of data to and from the network: prioritization, preemption, etc. Network applications that did5 not require such flexibility could use a more direct interface to the driver and the network.
So, there are a variety of choices to be made at different levels in the system in both the hardware and the software.
8.3.3 Implementation Example: SUN Workstation Interface To illustrate the EUS dependent portion of the interface we describe one specific interface. The interface is to the Sun-3 VME bus based workstationsmanufactured by Sun Microsystems, ~nc. This is an example of a single EUS
connected to a single network interface. The EUS also allows connection directlyto its system bus. The UIM hardware is envisioned as a single circuit board that15 plugs into the VME bus system bus.
First, there follows a description of the Sun I/O architecture, and then a description of the choices made in designing the interface hardware, the interface protocol, and the connection to new and existing network applications software.
20 8.3.3.1 SUNWorkstation_O Architecture The Sun-3's I/O architecture, based on the VME bus structure and its memory management unit (MMU), provides a DMA approach called direct virtual memory access (DVMA). ~IG. 17 shows the Sun D'~IMA. DVMA allows devices on the system bus to do DMA directly to Sun processor memory, and also 25 allow main bus masters to do DMA directly to main bus slaves without going through processor memory. It is called "virtual" because the addresses that a device on the system bus uses to communicate with the kernel are virtual addresses similar to those the CPU would use. The DVMA approach makes sure that all addresses used by devices on the bus are processed by the MMU, just as if 30 they were virtual addresses generated by the CPU. The slave decoder 512 (FIG. 18) responds tO the lowest megabyte of VME bus address space (OxO000 0000 -> OxOOOf ffff, in the 32 bit VME address space) and maps this megabyte into the most significant megabyte of the system virtual address space (Oxf~0 0000 -> Oxfff fff in the 28 bit virtual address space). (OX means that the subsequent 35 characters are hexadecimal characters.) When the driver needs to send the buffer address to the device, it must strip off the high 8 bits from the 28 bit address, so 1 3 1 4 9 5 ~

that the address that the device puts on the bus will be in the low megabyte (20bits) of the VM~. address space.
In FIG. 18, the CPU S00 drives a memory management unit 502, which is connected to a VME bus 504 and on board memory 506 that includes a 5 buffer 508. The VME bus communicates with DMA devices 510. Other on board bus masters, such as an ETHERNET access chip can also access memory 508 via MMU 502. Thus, devices can only make DVMA transfers in memory buffers that are reserved as DVMA space in these low (physical) memory areas. The kernel does however support redundant mapping of physical memory 10 pages into multiple virtual addresses. In this way, a page of user memory (orkernel memory) can be mapped into D~IMA space in such a way that the data appears in (or comes from) the address space of the process requesting that operation. The ~iver uses a routine called mbsetup to set up the kernel page rnaps to support this direct user space DVMA.
15 8.3.3.2 SUN UIM - EIJS Interface Approach As mentioned above therç are many options in designing a particular interface. With the Sun-3 interface, a DMA transfer approach was designed, an interface with PEP capabilities, an interface with high performance matching thesystem bus, and an EUS software flexibility to allow various new and existing 20 network applications to use the network. FIG. 19 shows an overview of the interface to the Sun-3.
The Sun-3's are systems with potentially many simultaneous processes running in support of the window system, and multiple users. The DMA and FEP
approachs were chosen to offload the Sun processor while the network transfers 25 are taking place. I~he UIM hardware is envisioned as a single circuit board that plugs into the VME bus system bus. With the chance to connect directly to the system bus it is desirable to attempt the highest performance inter~ace possible.
Sun's DVMA provides a means to move data efficiently to and from processor memory. There is a DMA controller 92 in the UIM (EIC3. 4) to move data from 30 the UIM to EUS memory and data from EUS memory to the UIM over the bus, and there will ~e a shared memory interface to move control info~nation in the host interfacing protocol. The front end processor (E7E3P) apprvach means that the data from the network is presented to the EUS at a higher level. Level 3 protocol processing has been performed and packets have been linked together into 35 LUWUs, the user's natural sized unit of transmission. With the potential variety of network applications that could be running on the Sun the FEP approach means ~ 3 ~

that EUS software does~not have to be tightly coupled to the internal network packet format.
The Sun-3 DVMA architecture will limi~ the EUS transaction sizes to a maximum of one megabyte. If user buffers are not locked in, then kernel 5 buffers would be used, as an intermediate step between the device and the user, with the associated performance penalty for the copy operation. If trans~ers aregoing to be made directly to user space, using the "mbsetup" approach, the user's space will be locked into memory, not available for swapping, during the whole transfer process. This is a tradeoff; it ties up the resources in the machine, but it 10 may be more efficient if it avoids a copy operation from some other buffer in the kernel.
The Sun system has existing network applications running on F.THERNET, for example, their Network File System (NFS). To run these existing applications on MAN but still leave open the possibility for new 15 applications that could use the expanded capabilities of MAN, we needed flexible EUS software and a flexible interface protocol to be able to simultaneously handle a variety of network applications.
FI~. 19 is a functional overview of the operation and interfaces among the NIM, UIM, and EUS. The specific EUS shown in ~is illustrative 20 example is a Sun-3 workstadon, but the principles apply to other end user systems having greater or lesser sophistication. Consider firs~ the direction from the MINT
via the NIM and IJIM to the EUS. As shown in FIG. 4, data that is received from MINT 11 over link 3 is distributed to one of a plurality of UIMs 13 over links 14 and is stored in receive buffer memory 90 of such a UIM, from which 25 data is transmitted in a ;pipelined fashion over an EUS bus 92 having a DMA
interface to the appropriate EUS. The control structure for accomplishing this transfer of data is shown in FIG. 19, which shows that the input from the MINT
is controlled by a MINT to NIM link handler 520, which transmits its output under the control of router 522 to one of a plurality of NIM to UIM link handlers 30 (N/IJ LH~ 524. MINT/NIM link handler (M/N LH) 520 supports a variant on the Metrobus physical layer protocol. The NIM to UIM link handler 524 also supports the Metrobus physical layer protocol in this implementation, but other protocols could be supported as well. It is possible that different protocols could coexist on the same NIM. The output of the N/U LH 524 is sent over a link 14 35 to a UIM 13, where it is buffered in receive buffer memory 90 by NIM/UIM linkhandler 552. The buffer address is supplied by memory manager 550, which 75 - :1~ 3 ~ 5 manages free and allocated packet buffer lists. The status of the packet reception is obtained by N/IT LH S52, which computes and verifies the checksum over header an data, and OutplltS the status information to receive packet handler 556, which pairs the status with the buffer address received fronn memory manager 550S and queues the info~nation on a received packet list. Information about received packets is then transferred to receive queue manager 558~ which assembles packetinfolmation into queues per LUWU and SUWU, and which also keeps a queue of LUWUs and SUWUs about which the EUS has not yet been notified. Receive queue manager 558 is polled for information about LUWlTs and SUWUs by the 10 EUS via the EUS/UIM link handler tE/U LH) 540, and responds with notificationmessages via UIM/EUS link handler (U/E LH) 562. Messages which notify the EUS of the reception of a SUWU also contain the data ~or the SUWU, thus completing the reception process. In the case of a LUWU, however, the EllTS
allocates its memory for reception, and issues a receive request via E/U LH 540 to 15 receive request handler 560, which formulates a receive worklist and sends it to resource manager 554, which controls the hardware and effects the data transfer over EUS bus 92 (FI~. 4) via a DMA arrangement. Note that the receive request from the EUS need not be for the entire amount of data in the LUWU; indeed, all of the data may not have even arrived at the UIM when the EUS makes its first ~0 receive request. When subsequent data for this LUWU ar~ives, the EU5 will again be notified and will have an opportunity to make additional receive requests In this fashion7 the reception of the data is pipelined as much as possible in order to reduce latency. Following data transfer, receive request handler 560 informs the EUS via U/E LH 562, and directs mernory manager 550 to de-allocate the 25 memory for that portion of the LUWU that was delivered, thus making that memory available for new incoming data.
In the reverse direction, i.e., from EUS ~6 to MINT 11, the operation is controlled as follows- driver 570 of EUS 26 sends a transmit request to transmit request handler 542 via U/E LH 562. In the case of a SUWIT, the 30 transmit re~quest itself contains the data to be transmitted, and transmit request handler 542 sends this data in a transmit worklist to resource manager 554, which computes the packet header and writes both header and data into buffer 15 (FIG. 4), from which it'is transmitted to NIM 2 by UIM/NIM link handler 546 when authorized to do so via the flow control protocol in force on link 14, The 35 packet is received at NIM 2 by UIMINIM link handler 530 and stored in buffer 94. Arbiter 532 then selects among a plurality of buffers 94 in NIM 2 to select the next packet or SUWU to be transmitted under the control of NIM/~IINT
link handler 534 on MINT link 3 to MINT 11. In the case of a LUWU, transmit request handler 542 decomposes ~he request into packets and sends a transmit worklist to resource manager 554, which, for each packet, formulates the header,S wr~tes the header into buffer 15, controls the hardware to effect the transfer of the packet data over EUS bus 92 via DMA, and directs U/N LH 546 to transmit the packet when authorized to do so. The transmission process is then as described for the SUWU case. In either case, transmit request handler 542 is notified by resource manager 554 when transmisslon of the SUWU or LUWU is complete, 10 whereupon driver 57û is notified via UIE LH 562 and may release its transmit buffers if desired.
FIG. 19 also shows details of the internal software structure of EUS 26. Two types of arrangements are shown, in one of which blocks 572, 574, 576, 578, 580 the user s~ystem perfonns level 3 and higher functions. Shown in 15 FIG. 19 is an implementation based on Network of the Advanced Research Projects Administration of the U.S. Department of Defense (ARPAnet) protocols including an internet protocol 580 (level 3), transmission control protocol (TCP) and user datagram protocol (UDP) block 578 (TCP being used for connection oriented service and UDP being arranged for connectionless service). At higher 20 levels are the remote procedure call (block 576), the network file server (block 574) and the user programs 572. Alternatively, the services of the MAN
network can be directly invoked by user (block 582) programs which directly interface with driver 570 as indicated by the null block 584 between the user and the driver.
25 8.3.3.3 33US Interface Functions The main functional parts of the transmi~ EUS interface are a control inter~ace with the EUS, and a DMA interface to transfer data between th~ EUS
and the UIM over the system bus. When transmitting into the network, control information is received that describes a LUWU or SUWUs to be transrnitted and 30 information about the EUS buffers where the data resides. The conlrol information from the EUS includes destinadon MAN address, des~ination group (virtual network), LUWU length, and type fields for type of service and higher level protocol type. The DMA interface moves the user data over from the EUS
buffers into the UIM. The network interface portion is responsible for formatting 35 the LUWUs and SUWUs into packets and transmitting the packets on the link to the network. The control interfaGe could have several var~ations for flow control, multiple outstanding requests, priority, and preemption. The UIM is in control of the arnount of data that it talces from the EUS memory and sends ;nto the network.
On the receive side, the EUS polls for information about packets that S have been received and the control interface responds with LUWU information from the packets header and current information about how moch of the EUS
transaction has ar~ived. Over the control interface, the EUS requests to receivedata from these messages, and the DMA interface will send the data from memory on the UIM into the EUS memory buffers. The poll and response mechanism in 10 the inte~face protocol on the receive side allows a lot of EUS flexibility for receiving data from the network. The EUS can receive either partial or entire transactions that have come from the source EUS; It also provides the flow control mechanism for the EUS on receive. The EUS is in control of what it receives> when it receives it, and in what order.
15 8.3.3.4 SUN Software This section describes how a typical end user system, a SUN-3 workstation, is connectable to MAN. Other end user systems would use different software. The interface to MAN is relatively straightforward and efficient for a number of systems which have been studied.
20 8.3.3.4.1 Existin~ Network Software The Sun UNIX(~) operating system is derived from the 4.2BSD UNIX
system from the University of California at Berkeley. Like 4.2BSD it contains aspart of the kernel, an implementation of the ARPAnet protocols: internet protocol (IP), transmission control protocol (TCP) for connection-oriented service on top of 25 IPs and user datagram protocol (UDP) for connectionless seTvice on ~op of IP.Current S~m systems use IP as an internet sublayer In the top half of the network layer. The bottom half of the network layer is a network specific sublayer. It currently consists of driver level software that interfaces to a specific network hardware connection, namely an ETHERNET controller, where the link layer 30 MAC protocol is implemented. ETHERNET is the network cu~ently used to connect Sun workstations. To connect Sun workstations with a MAN network, it is necessary to fit into the framework of this existing networking software. Thesoftware for the MAN network interface in the Sun will be driver level software.The MAN network is naturally a connectionless or datagram type of 35 network. LUWU da~a wi~h control information forms the EUS transaction crossing the inter~ace into the network. Existing network services can be provided ~3I~`5~

using the MAN network datagram LUWUs as a basis. Software in the Sun will build up both connectionless and connection-oriented transport and application services on top of a MAN datagram network layer. Since the Sun already has a variety of network application software, the MAN driver will provide a basic 5 service with the fiexibility to multiplex multiple upper layers. This multiplexing capability will be necessary not just for existing applications but for additional new applications that will use MAN's power more directly.
There needs to be an address translation service function in the EUS
at the driver level in the host software. Xt would allow for IP addresses to be 10 translated into MAN addresses. The address translation service is similar in function ~o the current Sun address resolution protocol (ARP), but different in implementation. If a particular EUS needs to update its address translation tables, it sends a network message with an IP address to a well known address translation server. The corresponding MAN address will be returned. With a set of such 15 address translation services, MAN can then act as the underlying network for many different, new and existing, network software services in ~he Sun environment.
8.3.3.4.2 Device Dr ver On the top side, the driver multiplexes several different queues of 20 LUWUs from the higher protocols and applications for transmission and queues up received LUWUs in several different queues for the higher layers. On the hardware side, the driver sets up DMA transfers to and from user memory buffers.The driver must communicate with the system to rnap user buffers into memory that can be accessed by the DMA controller over the main system bus.
On transrnit, the driver must do address transladon on the outgoing LlJWUs for those protocol layers that are not using MAN addresses, i.e., the ARPAnet protocols~ The MAN destination address and destination group is included in MAN datagram control information that is sent when a LUWU is to be ~ansmitted. Other transmit control information will be LUWU length, fields 30 indicating type of service and higher level protocoi, along with the data location for DMA, The UIM uses this control information to form packet headers and to move the LUWU data out of EUS memory.
On receive, the driver will implement a poll/response protocol with the UIM notifying the EUS of incorning data. The poll response will contain 35 control information that gives source address, total LUWU length, arnount of data that has arriYed up to this point, the type fields indicating higher protocol layers, i ~ 3 ~

and some agreed on amount of the data from the message. (For small messages, the whole user message could arrive in this poll response.) The driver itself has the flexibility based on the type field to decide how to receive this message and which higher level entity to pass it on up to. It may be, that based on a certain S type field, it may just deliver the announcement~ and pass the reception decision on up to a higher layer~ i Which ever approach is used, eventually a control request for the delivery of the data from the UIM to the EUS memory is made, which results in a DMA operation by the UIM. EUS buffers to receive the data may preallocated ~or the protocol types where the driver handles ~e reception in a 10 fixed fashion9 or the driver may have to get buffer inforrnation from a higher layer in the case where it has just passed the announcement on up. This is the type offlexibility we need in the driver to handle both existing and new applications in the Sun environment.
8.3.3.4.3 Raw MAN Interface Software Later, as applications are wlitten that wish to directly use the capabilities of the MAN network, the address translation function will not be necessary. The MAN datagram control information will be specified directly by special MAN network layer software.
9 MAN Protocols 20 9.1 Overview The MAN protocol provides for the delivery of user data from source UIM across the network to destination UIM. The protocol is connectionless, asymmetric for receive and send, implements error detection without correction, and discards layer purity for high perforrnance.
25 9.2 Messa~ Scenario The EUS sends datagram transactions called LUWUs into the network. The data that comes from the EUS resides in EUS memory. A control message from the EUS specifies to the UIM the data length, the destination address for this LUWU, ~e destination group and a type field which could contain30 information lL~ce the user protocol and the network class of service required.
Together, the data and the control inforrnation form the LUWU. Depending on the type of EUS interface, this data and control can be passed to the UIM in different ways, but it is likely that the data is passed in a DMA transfer.
The UIM will transmit dlis LUWU into the network. To reduce 35 potential delay, larger LUWUs are not sent into the network as one contiguousstream. The UIM breaks up the LUWU into fragments called packets tha~ can be up to a certain maximum size. An UWU smaller than the maximum size is called a SUWU and will be contained in a single packet. Several EUSs are concentrated at the NIM and packets are transmitted over the link from the UIM to the NIM
(the EUSL). Packets frorn one UIM can be demand multiplexed on the link from 5 the NIM ~o the MINT (the XL) with packets from other EUSs. Delays are reduced because no EUS has to wait for the completion of a long LU~1YU from another EUS sharing the link to the MINT. The UIM generates a header for every packet that contains information from the original LUWU transaction, so that each packet can pass through the network from source UIM to destination UIM and be 10 recombined into the same LUWU that was passed into the network by the source EUS. The packet header contains the information for the network layer protocol in the MAN network.
Before the NIM sends the packet to the MINT on the XL, it adds a NIM/MINT header to the packet message. The header contains the source port 15 number identifying the physical port on the NIM where a part;cular F~US/UIM is connected. This header is used by the MINT to verify that the source EUS is located at the port where he is authorized to be. This type of additional check is especially important for a data network that serves one or more virtual networks, to ensure privacy for such virtual networks. The MINT uses the packet header to 20 determine the route for the packet, as well as other potential services. The hIIMT
does not change the contents of the packet header. When the lLH in the MINT
passes the packet out through the switch to be sent out on the XL to the destination NIM, it places a different port number in the NIM/MINT header. This port number is the physical port on the NIM where the destination EUS/U~ is 25 connected. The destination ND~ uses this port number to ~ute ~he packet on the fly to the proper EUSL.~
The various sections of a packet are identified by delimiters according to the link format. Such delimiters occur between the NIM/~IINT header 600 and the MAN header 610, and between the MAN header and the rest of ~he packet.
30 The delimiter at the MAN header/rest of packet border is required to signal the header check sequence circuit to insert or check the header check. The NIM
broadcasts a received packet to all ports in the NIM~INT header field.
When the packet ~rrives at the destination UIM, the packet header contains the original information from the source UIM necessary to reassemble the 35 source EUS transaction. There is also enough information to allow a variety of EUS receive inte~face approaches including pipelining or other variations of EUS

8 1 1 3 ~ ~ ~
transaction size, prioritization, and preemption.
9.3 MAN Protocol DescIiption 9.3.1 Link Layer Functions The link functions are described in Section 5. The functions of 5 message beginning and end demarcation, data transparency, and message check sequences on the EUSL~ and XL links are discussed there.
A check sequence for the whole packet message is performed at the link level, but instead of corrective action being taken there, an indication of the error is passed on up to the network layer for handling there. A message check 10 sequence error results only in incrementing an error count for administrativepurposes, but the message transrnission continues. A separate header check sequence is calculated in hardware in the UIM. A header check sequence error detected by the MINT control results in the message being thr~wn away and an error count being incremented for administrative purposes. At the destination 15 UIM a header check sequence error also results in ~he message being thrown away. The data check sequence result can be conveyed to the EUS as part of the LUWU arrival notification, and the EUS can dçtermine whether of not to receive the message. These violations of layer purity have been made to simplify the processing at the link layer to increase speed and overall network performance.
Other "standard" link layer fimctions like error correction and flow control are not performed in the conventional manner. There are no acknowledgement messages returned at the link level for error correction (retransmission requests) or for fiow control. Flow control is signaled nsing special bits in the frarning pattern. The complexity of X.25-like protocols at the 25 link level can be tolerated for low speed links where the processing overhead will not reduce performance and does increase the reliability of links that haYe higherror rates. However, it is ~elt that an acceptable level of esror-free throughput will be achieved by the low bit error rates in the fiber optic links in this networlc (Bit E~ror Rate less than 10 errors per trillion bits.) Also, because of the large 30 amounts of buffer memory in the MINI and the UIM necessary to handle data from the high-speed links, it was felt that flow control messages would not be necessary or effective., 9.3.2 Networ Layer ~ 3 ~

9.3.2.1 Functions The message unit that leaves the source UIM and travels all the way to the destination UIM is the packet. The packet is not altered once it leaves the source UIM.
S The inforrnation in the UIM to UIM message header will allow the following functions to be performed:
- fiagmentation of LUWUs at the source UIM, - recombination of LUWUs a~ the destination UIM, - routing to the proper NIM at the MIN7, - routing to the proper UIM/13US port at the destination NIM, - MlNT transmission of variable length messages ~e.g., SUWU, packet, n packets), - destination UIM congestion control and arrival announcement, - detection and handling of message header errors, - addressing of network entities for internal network messages, - EUS authentication for delivery of network services only to authorized users.
9.3.2.2 Fo~nat FIG. 20 shows the UIM to MINT Message format. The MAN
header 610 consists of the Destination Address 612, the Source Address 614, the group (virtual network) identifier 616, group name 618, the type of service 620,the Packet Length tthe header plus data in bytes) 622, a type of seNice indicator 623, a protocol identifier 624 ~or use by end user systems for identifying the contents of EUS to EUS header 630, and the EIeader Check Sequence 626.
The header is of fixed length, seven 32-bit words or 224 bits long. The MAN
25 header is followed by an }~US to EUS header 630 to process message fragmentation. This header includes a LUWlJ identifier 632, a LUWU length indicator 634, the packet sequence number 636, the protocol identifier 638 for identifying the contents of the internal EUS protocol which is the header of user data 640, and the number 639 of the initial byte of data of this packet within the 30 total LUWU of information. Finally, user data 640 may be preceded for appropriate user protocols by the identity of thç destination port 642 and source port 644. The fields are 32 bits because that is the most efficient length ~integers) for present network control processors. Error checking is performed on the header in control software; this is the Header Check Sequence. At the link level, error35 checking done over the whole message; this is the Message Check Sequence 634.The NIM/I~IlNT header 600 (explained below) is also shown in the figure for 13~9~
- ~3 -completeness.
The destination address, group identification, type of service, and the source address are placed as the first five fields in the message for efficiency in MINT processing. The destination and group identification are used for routing, 5 the size for memory management, the type fields ~or special processing, and the source is used for service authentication.
9.3.2.2.1 Destination Address The Destination Address 612 is a MAN address that specifies to which EUS the packet is being sent. A MAN address is 32 bits long and is a flat 10 address that specifies an EUS connected to the network. (In internal network messages, if the high order bit in the MAN address is set, the address specifies an internal network entity like a MINT or NIM, instead of an EUS.) A MAN
address will be permanently assigned to an EUS and will identify an FUS even if it moves to different physical lo~ation on the network. If an EUS moves, it must15 sign in with a well-known routing authentication server to update the corresponden~e between its MAN address and the physical port on which it is located. Of course, the port number is supplied by the NIM so the EUS cannot cheae about where it is located.
In the MINT the destination address will be used to determine a 20 destination NIM for routing the message. In ~e destination NIM the destination address will be used to determine a destination UIM for routing the message.
9.3.2.2.2 Packet Length The PacketlLength 622 is 16 bits long and represents the length in bytes of this message fragment including the fixed length header and the data.
25 This length is used by the MINT for transmitting the message. It is also used by the destination UIM to determine the amount of data available for delivery to the EUS.
9.3.2.2.3 Type Fields The type o~ service field 623 is 16 bits long and contains the type of 30 service specified in the original EUS request. The MINT may look at the type of service and handle the message differently. The destination UIM may also look atthe type of service to determine how to deliver the message to the destination EUS, i.e., deliver even if in error. The user protocol 624 assists the EUS driver in multiplexing various streams of data from the network.

13~9~5 9.3.2.2.4 Packet Sequence Number This is a Packet Sequence Number 636 for this particular LUVVU
transmission. It helps the receiving IJIM recombine the incoming LUWU, so that it can determine if any fragments of the transmission have been lost because of S error. The sequence number is incremented for each fragment of the LUWU. The last sequence number is negative to indicate the last packet of a LUWU. (An SUWU would have -1 as the seguence number.) If an infinite length LUWU is being sent, the Packet Sequence Number should wrap around. (See UWU Length, Section 9.3.2.2.7, for an explanation of an infinite length LUWU.) 10 9.3.2.2.5 Source Address The Source Address 614 is 32 bits long and is a MAN address that specifies the EUS that sent the message. (See Desdnation Address for an explanation of MAN address.) The Source Address will be needed in the MINT
for network accounting. Coupled with the Port Number 600 from the NIM/MINT
15 header, it is used by the MINT to authenticate the source EUS for network services. The Source Address will be delivered to the destination EUS so that itknows the network address of the EUS that sent the message.
9.3.2.2.6 UWU ID
The UWU ID 632 is a 32 bit number that is used by the destination 20 UIM to recombine a UWU. Note that the recombination job is made easier because fragments cannot get out of order in the network. The UWU ID, along with the Source and Destination Addresses, identifies packets of the same LUWU, or in other words, fragments of the original datagrarn transaction. The ID must be unique ~or the source and destination pair for the time that any fragment is in the 25 network.
9.3.2.2.7 UW{J Length The UWIJ Length 634 is 32 bits long and represents the total length of UWU data in bytes~ In the first packet of a LUWU this will allow the destination UIM to do congestion control, and if the LUWU is pipelined into the 30 EUS, it will allow the UIM to begin a LUWU announcement and delivery before the complete LUWU arrives at the UlM.
A Length that is negative indicates an infinite length LTJWU, which is like an open channel between two EUSs. Closing down an infinite length LUWU
is done by sending a negative Packet Sequence Number. An infinite length 35 LUWU only makes sense where the UIM controls the DMA into EUS memory.

8s ~3~
9 3.2.2.8 Header Check,Sequence There is a header check sequence 626, calculated by the transmitting UIM for header inforrnation so that the MINT and the destination UIM can determine if the header information was received correctly. The MINT or the 5 destination UIM will not attempt delivery of a packet with a header check sequence error.
9.3.2.2.9 User Data The user dàta ~40 is the portion of the user UWU data that is transmitted in this fragment of the transmission. Following the data is the overall 10 message check sequence 646 calculated at the link level.
9.3.3 NIM/MINT Layer 9.3.3.1 Functions This protocol layer consists of a header containing a NIM pOIt number 600. The port number has a one to one correspondence to an EIJS
15 comlection on the NIM,and is prepended by the NIM in block 403 (FIG. 16) so that the user cannot enter false data therein. This header is positioned at the front of a packet message and is not covered by the overall packet message check sequence. It is checked by a group of parity bits in the same word to enhance its error reliability. The incomillg message to the MINT contains the source NIM
20 port number to assist in user authentication for network services that might be requested in the type fields. The outgoing message from the MINT contains the destination NIM port nùmber in place of the source port 600 in order~to speed the demultiplexing/routing by the NIM to the proper destination EUS. If the packet has a plurality of destination ports in one NIl~l, a list of these ports is placed at 25 the beginning of the packet so ~at section 600 of the header becomes se~eral words long.
10 LO&IN PROCEDURES AND VIRTUAL NETWORKS
10.1 General ,~
A system such as MAN is naturally most cost effective when it can 30 sen~e a large nurnber of customers. Such a large number of customers is likely to include a number of sets of users who require protection from ou~siders. Such users can convenien~ly be grouped into virtual networks. In order to provide still filrther flexibility and protection, individual users may be given access to a number of virtual networks. For example, all the users of one company may be 35 on one virtual network and the payroll department of that company may be on aseparate virtual network. The payroll depa~tment users should belong to both of 86 ~ 3~9~
these virtual networks since they may need access to general data about the corporation but the users outside the payroll department should not be members of the virtual network of the payroll department virtual network since they should not have access to payroll records.
S The login procedure method of source checking and the method of routing are the arrangements which permit the MAN system to support a large number of virtual networks while providing an optimum level of protection against unauthorized data access. Further, the arrangement whereby the NIM
prepends the user port to every packet, gives additional protection against access 10 of a virtual network by an unauthorized user lby preventing aliasing.
10.2 Building Up the Authorization Data Base FIG. lS illustrates the administrative control of the MAN network. A
data base is stored in disk 351 accessed via operation, administration, and maintenance (OA&M) system 350 for authorizing users in response to a login 15 request. For a large MAN network, OA&M system 350 may be a distributed multiprocessor arrangement for handling a large volume OI login requests. This data base is arranged so that users cannot access restricted virtual networks ofwhicb they are not members. The data base is under the control of three types ofsuper users. A first super user who would in general be an employee of the 20 common carrier that is supplying MAN service. This super user, referred to for convenience herein as a level 1 super user, assigns a block of MAN names which would in general consist of a block of numbers to each user group and assigns type 2 and type 3 super users to particular ones of these names. The level 1 super user also assigns vir~ual networks to particular MAN groups. Finally, a level 1 25 super user has the authority to create or destroy a MAN supplied service such as electronic "yellow page" service. A type 2 super user assigns valid MAN names fron1 the block assigned to the particular user community, and assigns physical port access restrictions where appropriate. In addition, a type 2 super user has the authority to restrict access to certain virtual networks by sets of members of his 30 customer community.
Type 3 super users who are broadly equal in authority to type 2 super users, have ~he authority to grant MAN names access to their virtual networks.
Note that such access can only be granted by a type 3 super user if the MAN
name's type 2 super user hai allowed this MAN narne user the capability of 35 joining this group by an appropriate entry in taUe 370.

-87- ~3~4~
The data base includes table 360 which provides for each user identification 3S2, the password 361, the group 363 accessible using that password, a list of ports and, for special cases, directory numbers 364 from which that user may transmit and/or receive, and the type of service 365, i.e., receive S only, transmit only, or receive and transmit.
The data base also in~ludes user-capability tables 370,375 for relating users (table 370) to groups (table 375) potentially authorizable for each user.
When a user is to be authorized by a super user to access a group, this table ischecked to see if that group is in the list of table 370; if not the request to 10 authorize that user for that group will be rejected. Super users have authority to enter data for their group and their groups in tables 370,375. Super users also have the authority for their user to move a group from table 375 into the list of groups 363 of the user/group authonzation table 360. Thus, for a user to access an outside group, super users from both groups would have to authorize this 15 access.
10.3 Login Procedure At login time, a user who has previously been appropriately authorized according to~ the arrangements described above, sends an initial login request message to the MAN network. This message is destined not for any other 20 user, but for the MAN network itself: Effectively, this message is a header only message which is analyzed by the MINT central control. The password, type of login seNice being requested, MAN group, MAN name and port number are all in the MAN header of a login request, replacing other fields. This is done because only the header is passed by the XLH to the MINT central control, for further 25 processing by the OA~M central control. The login data which includes the MAN name, the requested MAN group name (virtual network name), and the password are comparedlagainst the login authorization data base 351 to check whether the particular user is authorized to access that virtual network from the physical port to which that user is connected ~the physical port was prepended by 30 the NIM prior to reception of the login packet by the MINT). If the user is in fact properly authorized, ~hen the tables in source checker 307 and in router 309 (FIG. 14) are updated. Only the source checker table of the checker that processes the login user's port is updated from a login for terminal operations. If a login rçquest is for receive functions, then the routing tables of all MINTs must 35 be updated to allow that source to receive data from any authorized connectable user of the same group who may be connected to other MINTs to respond to ~3~L~9~
- ~8 -requests. The source checker table 308 includes a list of authorized name/group pairs for each port connected to the NIM that sends the data stream to the XLH
for that source checker. The router tables 310, all include entries for all users au~horized to receive UWUs. Each entry includes a name/group pair, and the S corresponding NIM and port number. The entries in the source checlcer list aregrouped by group identification numbers. The group identification number 616 is part of the header of subsequent packets from the logged in user, and is derisred by the OA&M system 350 at login time and sent back by the OA&M system via the MAN swi~ch 10 to the login user. The OA&M system 350 uses the MINT
10 central control's 20 access 19 to the M~T memory 18 to enter the login acknowledge to the login user. On subsequent packets, as they are received in the MINT, the source checker checks the port number, MAN name and MAN group against the authorization table in the source checker with the result that the packet is allowed to proceed ~r not. The router then checks to see if the destination is an 15 allowable destination for that input by checking the virtual network group narne and the destination name. As a result, once a user is logged in, the user can reach any destination that is in the routing tables, i.e., that has previously logged in for access in the read only mode or the read/write mode, and that has the same virtual network group narne as requested in the login; in contrast unauthorized users are 20 blocked in every packet.
While in the present embodiment, the checking is done for each packet, it could also be done for each user work unit (LUWU or SUWU), with a recorded indication that all subsequent packets of a I.UWU whose original pacXetwas rejected are also to; be rejected, or by rejecting all LUWUs whose initial 2S packet is missing at the user system.
Those super user logins which are assodated with making changes in the login data base are checked in the same way as conventional logins except that it is recognized in OA&M system 350 as a login request for a user who has authority for changing the data base stored on disk 351.
Super users! types 2 and 3 get access to the OA&M system 350 from a computer connected to a user port of MAN. OA&M system 350 derives statistics on billing, usage, authorizations and performance which the super users can access from their computers.
The MAN network can also serve special types of users such as 35 transrnit only users and receive only users. An example of a transmit only user is a broadcast stock quota~ion system or a video transmitter. Outputs of transmit 1 3 ~

only users are only checked in source checker tables. Receive only units such asprinters or monitoring devices are authorized by entries in the routing tables.

FIG. 22 shows an arrangement for using the MAN architecture to 5 switch voice as well as data. In order to simplify the application of this architecture to such sel~ices, an existing switch in this case, the 5ESS(~) switch manufactured by AT&T Network Systems, is used. The advantage of using an existing switch is that it avoids the necessity for developing a program to control a local switch, a very large development effort. By using an existing switch as 10 the interface between the MAN and voice users, this effort can be almost completely eliminated. Shown on FIG. 22 is a conventional customer telephone connected to a switching module 1207 of SESS switch 1200. This customer telephone could also be a combined integrated services digital network (ISDN) voice and data customer station which can also be connected to a SESS switch.
15 O~er customer stations 1202 are connected through a subscriber loop caTrier system l203 which is connected to a switching module 1207. The switching modules 1207 are connected to a time multiplex switch 1209 which sets up connections between switching modules. Two of these switching modules are shown connected to an interface 1210 comprising Common Channel Signaling 7 (CCS 7) signaling channels 1211, pulse code modulation (PCM) channels 1213, an special signaling channels 1215. These are connected to a packet assembler and disassembler 1217 for interfacing with an MAN NlM 2. The fimction of the PAD is to interface between the PCM signals which are generated in the switch and the packet signals which are switched in the M AN network. The function of 25 the special signaling channel 1215 is to inform PAD 1~17 of the source and destination associated with each PCM channel. The CCS 7 channels transmit packets which require further processing by PAD 1217 to get them into the form necessary for switching by the M AN network. To make the system less vulnerable against the failure of equipment or ~ansmission facilities, the switch is 30 shown as being connected to two different NIMs of the MAN network. A digital PBX 1219 also interfaces with packet assembler disassembler 1217 directly. In a subsequent upgrade of the PAD, it would be possible to interface directly with SLC 1203 or with telephones such as integrated services digital network (ISDN) telephones that generate a digital volce bit stream directly.

13~5~

The NlMs are connected to a MAN hub 1230. The NlMs are connected to MINTs 11 of that hub. The MINTs 11 are interconnected by MAN
switch 22.
Por this type of configuration, it is desirable to switch substantial 5 quantities of data as well as voice in order to utilize the capabilities of the MAN
hub most effectively. Voice packets, in particular, have very short delay requirements in order to minimize the total delay encountered in transmitting speech from a source to a destination and in order to ensure that there is no substantial interpacket gap which would resul~ in the loss of a portion of the 10 speech signal.
The basic design parameters for MAN have been selected to optimize data switching, and have been adapted in a most straightforward manner as shown in FIG. 22. If a large amount of voice packet switching is required, one or moreof the following additional steps can be taken:
1. A forrn of coding such as adaptive differential PCM (ADPCM) which offers excellent performance at 32 Kbit/second could be used instead of 64 Kbit PCM. Excellent coding schemes are also available which require fewer than 32 Kbitlsec. for good performance.
2. Packets need only be sent when a customer is actually speaking. This reduces the number of packets that must be sent by at least 2:1.
3. The size of the buffer for buffering voice sarnples could be increased above the s~orage for 256 voice samples (a two packet buffer) per channel.
However, longer voice packets introduce rnore delay which may or may not be tolerable depending on the characte~istics of the rest of the voice network.
4. ~loice traffic might be concentrated in specialist MINTs to reduce the number of switch setup operations for voice packets. Such an arrangement may enlarge the number of customers affected by a failure of a NIM or MINT and might require arrangements for providing alternate paths to another NIM and/or MI~r.
5. Alternate hub configurations can be used.
The altemate hub configuration of FIG. 24 is an example of a step 5 solution. A basic problem of switching voice packets is that in order to minimize delay in transmitting voice, the voice packets must represent only a short segment 35 of speech, as low as 20 milliseconds according to some estimates. This corresponds to as many' as 50 packets per second for each direction of speech. If i - 91 - 1 3 ~
a substantial fraction o~ the input to a MINT represented such voice packets, ~he circuit switch setup timé might be too great to handle such traffic. If only voice traffic were being switched, a packet switch which would not require circuit setup operations might be needed for high traffic situations.
S One embodiment of such a packet switch 1300 comprises a group of MINTs 1313 interconnected like a conventional array of space division switches wherein each MINT 1313 is connected to four others, and enough stages are added to reach all output MlNTs 1312 that carry heavy voice traffic. For added protection against equipment failure, the MINTs 1313 of the packet switch 1300 10 could be interconnected th~ough MANS 10 in order to route traffic around a defective MINT 1313 and to use a spare MINT 1313 instead.
The output bit stream of NIM 2 is connected to one of the inputs (XL) of an input M~T 1311. The packet data traffic leaving input MINT 1311 can continue to be switched through MANS 10. In this embodiment, the data 15 packet output of MANS 10 is merged with the voice packet output of data switch 1300 in an output MINT 1312 which receives the outputs of MANS 10 and data switch 1300 on the XL 16 (input) side and whose IL 17 output is the input bit stream of NIM 2, produced by a PASC circuit 290 (FIG. 13). Input MINT 1311 does not contain the PASC circuit 290 (FIG. 13) for generating the 20 output bit stream to NIM 2. For output MINT 1312 the inputs to the XLs from MANS 10 pass through~ a phase alignment circuit 292 (FIG. 13) such as that shown in FIG. 23, since such inputs come from man;y different sources through circuit paths that insert different delay.
This arrangèment can also be used for switching high priority data 25 packets through the packet switch 1300 while retaining ~he circuit switch 10 for switching low priority data packets. With this arrangement, it is not necessary to connect the packet switch 1300 to output MINTs 1312 carrying no voice traffic; in that case, high priority packets to MINTs ca~ying no voice traffic would have tobe routed ~hrough circuit switch MANS 10.

FIG. 21 illùstrates one arrangement for controlling access by MINTs 11 to the MAN switch control 22. Each MINT has an associated access controller 1120. A data ring 1102,104,1106 distributes data indicating the availability of output links to each logic and count circuit 1110 of each access35 controller. Each access controller 1120 maintains a list 1110 of output links such as 1112 to which it wants to send data, each link having an associated priority 1 3 .14 9 ~ ~

indicator 1114. A MINT can seize an Outpllt link of that list by marking the link unavailable in ring 1102 and transmitting an order to the MAN switch control 22 to set up a yath from an ILH of that MINl` to the requested output link. When the full data block to be transmitted to that output link has been so transn itted, S the MINT marlcs ehe output link a~ailable in the data transmitted by data ring 1102 which thereby makes that output link available for access by other MINrs.
A problem with using only availability data is that during periods of congestion the time before a particular MINT may get access to an output link can 10 be excessive. In order to even the accessibility of any output link to any MINT, the following arrangement is used. Associated with each link availability indication, called a ready bit transmitted in ring 1102, is a window bit transmitted in ring 1104. The ready bit is controlled by any MINT that seizes or releases anoutput link. The window bit is controlled by the access controller 1120 of only a lS single MINT called, for the purposes of this description, the controlling MrNT. In this particular embodiment, the controlling MlNT for a given output link is ~he MINT to which the corresponding output link is routed.
The effect of an open window (window bit = 1) is to let the first access controller on the ring that wants to seize an output link and recogni~es its 20 availability as the ready bit passes the controller, seize such a link, and to let any controllsr which tries to seize an unavailable link set the priority indicator 1114 for t'nat unavailable link. The effect of a closed window twindow bit = 0) is topermit only controllers which have a priority indicator set for a corresponding available link to seize that available link. The window is closed by the access 25 controller 1120 of the controlling MINT whenever the logic and count circuit 1100 of thac controller detects that the output lin~ is not available (ready bit = 0~ and is opened whenever that controller detec~s that that output link isavailable (ready bit = lj.
The operation of an access controller seizing a link is as follows. If 30 the link is unavailable (ready bit = 0) and the window bit is one, the accesscontroller sets the priority indicator 1114 for that output link. If the link isunavailable and the window bit is zero, the controller does nothing. If the link is available and the window bit is one, the controller seizes the link and marks the ready bit zero to ensure; that no other controller seizes the same link. If the link is 35 available and the window bi~ is zero, then only a controller whose priority indicator 1114 is set for thac link can seize that link and will do so by marking the 1 3 .~ 4 9 ~ ~

ready bit zero. The action of the access con~oller of the controlling MINT on the window bit is simpler: that controller simply copies the value of the ready bit into the window bit.
In addition to the ready and window bits, a frame bit is circulated in S ring 1106 to define the beginning of a frame of resource availability data, hence, to define the count for identifying the link associated with each clear and window bit. Data on the three rings 1102, l 104 and 1106 circulates serially and in synchronism through the logic and count circuit 1100 of each MINT.
The result of this type of operation is that those access controllers 10 which are trying to seize an output link and which are located between the unit that first successfully seized that output link and the access controller that controls the window bit have priority and will be served in turn before any other controllers that subsequently may make a request to seize the specific output link.
As a result, an approximately fair distribution of access by all MINTs to all output 15 links is achieved.
If this alternative approach to controlling MINT 11 access control to the MANSC 22 is used, priority is controlled from the MINT. Each MINT
maintains a priority and a regular queue for queuing requests, and makes requests for MANSC services first from the MINT priority queue.

It is to be understood that the above dest,ription is only of one preferred embodirnent of the invention. Numerous other arrangements may be devised by one skilled in the art without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention. The invention is thus limited only as defined in the accompanying 25 claims.

i 3 ~
94 w APPENDIX A
ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

lSC First Stage Controller 2SC ' Second Stage Con~oller ACK Acknowledge ARP Address Resolution Protocol ARQ Automatic Repeat Request BNAK Busy Negative Acknowledge CC Central Control CNAK Control Negative Acknowledge CNet Control Network CRC Cyclic Redundancy Check or Code DNet Data Network DRAM Dynamic Random Access Memory DVMA ~ Direct Virtwal Memory Access F.US End User System EUSL End User Link (Connects NIM and UIM) FEP Front End Processor FIFO First In First Out FNAK Fabric Blocking Negative Acknowledge IL Internal Link tConnects MINT and MANS) ILH Inte~nal Link Handler IP Internet Protocol LAN Local Area Network LllWU Long UserWork Unit MAN Exemplary Metropolitan Area Network MANS MAN Switch MANSC MAN/Switch Controller MINT Memory and Interface Module MMU Memory Management Unit NAK Negative Acknowledge N:IM Netwo~k Interface Module - ~ \

- 95 - 1 3 ~
OA&M Operation, Administration and Maintenance PASC Phase Alignment and Scramble Circuit SCC Switch Control Complex SUWU Short User Work Unit TCP Transmission Control Protocol TSA Time Slot Assigner UDP [Jser Datagram Pro~ocol UIM User Interface Module UWU UserWork Unit VLSI Very Large Scale Integration VME(~) bus An IEEE Standard Bus WAN Wide Area Network XL External Link (Connects NIM to MIN13 XLH External Link Handler XPC Crosspoint Controller

Claims (12)

1. In a data network, a method of obtaining security in packet transmission from an input port to an output port, comprising the steps of:
including in each data packet an identity of said input port and an identity of a user of said input port transmitting said each data packet, and in said network, prior to transmitting to said output port, for said each data packet, checking whether said user, identified by said user identity, has been previously authorized to transmit from said input port identified by said port identity if network transmission capacity is available.

2. In a data network, a method of obtaining security in packet transmission from an input port to an output port, comprising the steps of:
including in each data packet an identity of said input port and an identity of a user of said input port transmitting said each data packet; and in said network, prior to transmitting to said output port, for said each data packet, checking whether said user, identified by said user identity, has been previously authorized to transmit from said input port identified by said port identity if network transmission capacity is available;
wherein said identity of said port is supplied by said data network and is out of control of a user at said port.

3. A data network for transmitting data packets, comprising:
means for inserting in a packet an identity of a port transmitting said packet, said means being comprised in said network and out of control of a user at said port; and means for authenticating from said identity of said port and from addressing data in said packet whether said port is authorized to transmit said packet to said network prior to transmitting said packet to a destination.

4. The data network of claim 3 wherein said means for authenticating further comprises means for authenticating whether said port is authorized to transmit said packet to a destination user identified in said addressing data.

5. In a data network, a method of achieving secure transmission from a source user to a destination user comprising the steps of:
said destination user logging into said system with a login data packet comprising a destination user password, destination user identification, a destination group identification, and a destination port identification supplied by said network;
said data network authenticating said destination user password, destination user identification, destination user group number, and destination user port number as being authorized to receive packets for said destination group and user, said source user logging into said system with a login packet comprising an identification of said source user, a source user password, a source group identification, and a source port identification supplied by said network;
authenticating said source user password and source user, source user group, and source user port identifications;
recording, in source tables, authorization for said identifications of said source user, source group, and source port;
recording, in routing tables, authorization for said destination user and said destination group, and an identity of said destination port;
for each transmitted packet, checking a source user identification and source group identification, and a source port identification supplied by said network, in said source tables, and finding a destination port using a destination user identification and a destination group identification in said routing tables;
if results of said source checking and destination port finding steps indicate that said source and said destination have been recorded in said sourcetables and said destonation tables, transmitting said packet to a destination port identified in said finding step.

6. The method of claim 5 wherein said source group and said destination group for a transmitted packet are the same, whereby only users with a common group identification may communicate.

7. The method of claim 6 further comprising the steps of:
if results of said source checking and said destination finding do not indicate that said source and said destination have been recorded in said sourcetables and said destination tables, discarding said packet.

8. The method of claim 7 further comprising the step of recording source and destination data for a packet to be discarded.

9. The method of claim 6 wherein said destination finding step further comprises the step of inserting an identification of said destination port found in said destination finding step into said each transmitted packet.

10. The method of claim 2 further comprising the steps of:
checking whether a virtual network number comprised in said each data packet is authorized for said user identity and said port identity;
checking whether a destination identification comprised in said each data packet is included in a virtual network specified by said virtual network number; and responsive to positive results from said checking steps, transmitting said each packet to a port identified by said destination identification.

11. The data network of claim 4, wherein said means for authenticating comprises means for authenticating whether a user identified in said packet is authorized to transmit from said port to a virtual network identified in said packet.

12. The data network of claim 11 wherein said means for authenticating further comprises means for authenticating whether a destination identified in said data network is authorized to receive packets forsaid virtual network.