CA2053745C - Arrangement for motivating telemarketing agents - Google Patents
Arrangement for motivating telemarketing agentsInfo
- Publication number
- CA2053745C CA2053745C CA002053745A CA2053745A CA2053745C CA 2053745 C CA2053745 C CA 2053745C CA 002053745 A CA002053745 A CA 002053745A CA 2053745 A CA2053745 A CA 2053745A CA 2053745 C CA2053745 C CA 2053745C
- Authority
- CA
- Canada
- Prior art keywords
- agent
- performance
- individual
- current
- measure
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Expired - Fee Related
Links
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q30/00—Commerce
- G06Q30/02—Marketing; Price estimation or determination; Fundraising
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q10/00—Administration; Management
- G06Q10/06—Resources, workflows, human or project management; Enterprise or organisation planning; Enterprise or organisation modelling
- G06Q10/063—Operations research, analysis or management
- G06Q10/0639—Performance analysis of employees; Performance analysis of enterprise or organisation operations
- G06Q10/06398—Performance of employee with respect to a job function
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q30/00—Commerce
- G06Q30/02—Marketing; Price estimation or determination; Fundraising
- G06Q30/0207—Discounts or incentives, e.g. coupons or rebates
- G06Q30/0238—Discounts or incentives, e.g. coupons or rebates at point-of-sale [POS]
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04M—TELEPHONIC COMMUNICATION
- H04M3/00—Automatic or semi-automatic exchanges
- H04M3/42—Systems providing special services or facilities to subscribers
- H04M3/50—Centralised arrangements for answering calls; Centralised arrangements for recording messages for absent or busy subscribers ; Centralised arrangements for recording messages
- H04M3/51—Centralised call answering arrangements requiring operator intervention, e.g. call or contact centers for telemarketing
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04M—TELEPHONIC COMMUNICATION
- H04M3/00—Automatic or semi-automatic exchanges
- H04M3/42—Systems providing special services or facilities to subscribers
- H04M3/50—Centralised arrangements for answering calls; Centralised arrangements for recording messages for absent or busy subscribers ; Centralised arrangements for recording messages
- H04M3/51—Centralised call answering arrangements requiring operator intervention, e.g. call or contact centers for telemarketing
- H04M3/523—Centralised call answering arrangements requiring operator intervention, e.g. call or contact centers for telemarketing with call distribution or queueing
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04M—TELEPHONIC COMMUNICATION
- H04M2201/00—Electronic components, circuits, software, systems or apparatus used in telephone systems
- H04M2201/38—Displays
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04M—TELEPHONIC COMMUNICATION
- H04M3/00—Automatic or semi-automatic exchanges
- H04M3/42—Systems providing special services or facilities to subscribers
- H04M3/50—Centralised arrangements for answering calls; Centralised arrangements for recording messages for absent or busy subscribers ; Centralised arrangements for recording messages
- H04M3/51—Centralised call answering arrangements requiring operator intervention, e.g. call or contact centers for telemarketing
- H04M3/5175—Call or contact centers supervision arrangements
Abstract
In an ACD system, motivational feedback information, such as the cumulative number of bonus points earned, is displayed on agents' terminal displays.
The information is real-time, up-to-date, and substantially continuously displayed. It combines an objective, quantitative measure, such as the number of calls handled, and a subjective, qualitative measure, such as a quality factor representing a supervisor's evaluation of the agents' observed performance in handling calls.
Illustratively, the per-call quantitative measure is multipled by an agent's presently-assigned qualitative measure to arrive at the per-call number of bonuspoints earned by the agent.
The information is real-time, up-to-date, and substantially continuously displayed. It combines an objective, quantitative measure, such as the number of calls handled, and a subjective, qualitative measure, such as a quality factor representing a supervisor's evaluation of the agents' observed performance in handling calls.
Illustratively, the per-call quantitative measure is multipled by an agent's presently-assigned qualitative measure to arrive at the per-call number of bonuspoints earned by the agent.
Description
2~3~4~
ARRANGEMENT FOR MOTIVATING TELEMARKETING AGENTS
Technical Field This invention is directed to electronic telemarketing systems, such as automatic call distribution (ACD) systems.
5 Back~round of the Invention One of the major concerns of ACD system call managers is motivating their agents and m~int~ining the agents' interest and demeanor. Presently, no truly effective techniques for maintaining agent motivation appear to exist. The result is widespread low morale, high stress, and a high rate of turnover among ACD agents.
10 The consequent human and dollar costs are high.
Call managers try to motivate agents by providing incentives, such as having contests between agents about who handles the greatest number of calls, or awarding bonus points for handled calls that are applied toward prizes. But, other than trying to keep their own count of calls handled or points awarded -- a very15 difficult thing to do given the extremely busy nature of ACD agents' work - the agents typically do not have a ready and real-time source of up-to-date information of this sort. Lacking this information, they become bored, lax, and lose motivation.
Furthermore, this purely quantitative form of motivation, e.g., based entirely on the numbers of calls handled, or sales made, can lead to undesirable results, such as 20 agents trying to pass difficult and time-consuming calls to other agents, or being discourteous and curt with customers, in order to handle calls as fast as possible.
To forestall such undesirable results, call managers have, and employ, a capability of listening in on agents' calls, whereby they are able to evaluate the quality of agents' performance. But the call managers typically lack an effective 25 way of immediately conveying the results of their evaluation to the agents. Hence, in order to either correct an agent's technique or to motivate the agent with praise, the manager must interrupt the agent's work and give him or her oral feedback.
Because of the deleterious effect of such interruptions, the giving of feedback is typically reserved for the end of the agent's workday. But coming only at the work 30 end, such feedback is not wholly effective. Furthermore, lacking such feedback during the workday, agents become bored, lax, and lose motivation.
Summary of the Invention This invention is directed to solving these and other disadvantages and problems of the prior art. According to the invention, there is provided a method and 35 an arrangement for providing performance feedback to telemarketing agents, such as ACD system agents, as follows. Current measures of at least one of, and preferably - ~ ao537~9 of both of, quantitative and qualitative performance of each agent are obtained. The current measure or measures obtained for each individual agent are used to derive for each individual agent a current indicator of the individual agent's overall performance. Each individual agent's current indicator of overall performance is fed 5 back to the individual agent, preferably through the agent's telecommunications terminal. For example, the current indicator is constantly displayed on the terminal.
The procedure is performed repetitively.
In accordance with one aspect of the invention there is provided an arrangement for providing performance feedback to telemarketing agents, 10 comprising: first means for repeatedly obtaining a current measure of quantitative performance of each agent during a workday of the agent; second means for repeatedly obtaining a current measure of qualitative performance of each agent;third means for using the obtained current measure of the qualitative performance and the obtained current measure of the quantitative performance for each individual 15 agent repeatedly to derive for each individual agent a current indicator of overall performance of said individual agent during the workday of the individual agent; and fourth means for repeatedly feeding back each individual agent's current indicator of the overall performance to the individual agent during the workday of the individual agent, thereby to provide each individual agent with substantially real-time 20 up-to-date feedback on the individual agent's overall performance.
In accordance with another aspect of the invention there is provided a method of providing performance feedback to telemarketing agents, corriprising the steps of: repeatedly obtaining a current measure of quantitative performance of each agent during a workday of the agent; repeatedly obtaining a current measure of 25 qualitative performance of each agent; using the obtained current measure of the qualitative performance and the obtained current measure of the quantitative perforrnance for each individual agent repeatedly to derive for each individual agent a current indicator of the individual agent's overall performance of the individual agent during the workday of the individual agent; and repeatedly feeding back each 30 individual agent's current indicator of the overall performance to the individual agent repeatedly during the workday of the individual agent, thereby to provide each individual agent with substantially real-time up-to-date feedback on the individual agent's overall performance.
In an illustrative embodiment of the invention, a factor representative of 35 current qualitative performance of each agent is repeatedly obtained and eachincrement in quantitative performance of each agent is measured. Each measured ~, ~i 205~749 - 2a-increment for each individual agent is then modified by the factor for the individual agent so as to obtain a weighted increment for the individual agent. The obtained increment for each individual agent is then added to a sum of previously-obtained weighted increments for the individual agent to derive for each individual agent a current indicator of the individual agent's overall performance. Each individualagent's current indicator is then electronically constantly reported to the individual agent through their telecommunications terminal.
Every agent thereby constantly receives an up-to-date indication of their performance preferably in terrns of both quantitative and qualitative criteria. This feedback serves to motivate the agents in their endeavours and to improve their performance.
These and other advantages and features of the invention will become - apparent from the following description of an illustrative embodiment of the invention taken together with the drawing.
Brief Description of the Drawin~
FIG. 1 is a block diagram of an ACD system that includes an illustrative embodiment of the invention;
FIG. 2 is a diagram of an agent status table of the system of FIG. 1;
FIG. 3 is a flow diagram of an agent log-in routine of the system of FIG. 1;
FIG. 4 is a flow diagram of a call-completion routine of the system of FIG. 1;
FIG. 5 is a flow diagram of a supervisor-evaluation routine of the system of FIG. 1; and 2~537~i FIG. 6 is a flow diagram of an agent log-off routine of the system of FIG. 1.
Detailed Description FIG. 1 shows in block form an illustrative example of an ACD system.
5 An ACD system is a telemarketing system wherein calls are distributed automatically among agents. The system comprises a plurality of telecommunication terminals 110, each staffed by an agent 111, connected to a switching system 100 which is in turn connected to a plurality of telecommunication links 103. Each terminal 110 is illustratively a data terminal and a telephone set, or a 10 telephone set with a data display. Switching system 100 is illustratively a PBX, such as the AT&T System 85 or Definity~ PBX. Links 103 are illustratively telephony lines and trunks that connect switching system 100 to the public telephone system (not shown). Optionally, also connected to switching system 100 is an adjunct processor 140. Adjunct processor 140 is a record-keeping and report-generating 15 system for switching system 100 functions, such as the CMS adjunct processor of AT&T. Switching system 100 includes, and is operated under control of, a processor 101 that executes an ACD program 102 which is stored in its memory 104.
Illustratively, processor 101 causes incoming calls to be distributed and connected to idle terminals 110, and to be queued up for distribution when no terminals 110 are 20 idle. Alternatively, processor 101 generates outgoing calls, and causes the generated calls to be distributed and connected to idle termin~lc 110. For each call, processor 101 generates a record of information, referred to hereinafter as switch-related information. Switch-related information includes, for example, the telephone number of the party to the call, and the number of presently queued calls.
25 Processor 101 sends the switch-related information along with the corresponding call to the terminal 110 to which the call is connected, for display on that terminal's display 112.
Also connected to switching system 100 is a supervisory terminal 120 operated by a supervisor 121. Through supervisory t--rrnin~l 120, supervisor 121 can 30 listen in on calls being handled at terminals 110 by agents 111, and can provide input to processor 101 to affect the operation of the ACD system of FIG. 1.
As described so far, the system of FIG. 1 is conventional. According to an illustrative example of the invention, the conventional system is modified byadding to ACD program 102 in memory 104 the data structure 200 and routines 230,35 240, 250, and 260 shown in FIGS. 2-6.
ARRANGEMENT FOR MOTIVATING TELEMARKETING AGENTS
Technical Field This invention is directed to electronic telemarketing systems, such as automatic call distribution (ACD) systems.
5 Back~round of the Invention One of the major concerns of ACD system call managers is motivating their agents and m~int~ining the agents' interest and demeanor. Presently, no truly effective techniques for maintaining agent motivation appear to exist. The result is widespread low morale, high stress, and a high rate of turnover among ACD agents.
10 The consequent human and dollar costs are high.
Call managers try to motivate agents by providing incentives, such as having contests between agents about who handles the greatest number of calls, or awarding bonus points for handled calls that are applied toward prizes. But, other than trying to keep their own count of calls handled or points awarded -- a very15 difficult thing to do given the extremely busy nature of ACD agents' work - the agents typically do not have a ready and real-time source of up-to-date information of this sort. Lacking this information, they become bored, lax, and lose motivation.
Furthermore, this purely quantitative form of motivation, e.g., based entirely on the numbers of calls handled, or sales made, can lead to undesirable results, such as 20 agents trying to pass difficult and time-consuming calls to other agents, or being discourteous and curt with customers, in order to handle calls as fast as possible.
To forestall such undesirable results, call managers have, and employ, a capability of listening in on agents' calls, whereby they are able to evaluate the quality of agents' performance. But the call managers typically lack an effective 25 way of immediately conveying the results of their evaluation to the agents. Hence, in order to either correct an agent's technique or to motivate the agent with praise, the manager must interrupt the agent's work and give him or her oral feedback.
Because of the deleterious effect of such interruptions, the giving of feedback is typically reserved for the end of the agent's workday. But coming only at the work 30 end, such feedback is not wholly effective. Furthermore, lacking such feedback during the workday, agents become bored, lax, and lose motivation.
Summary of the Invention This invention is directed to solving these and other disadvantages and problems of the prior art. According to the invention, there is provided a method and 35 an arrangement for providing performance feedback to telemarketing agents, such as ACD system agents, as follows. Current measures of at least one of, and preferably - ~ ao537~9 of both of, quantitative and qualitative performance of each agent are obtained. The current measure or measures obtained for each individual agent are used to derive for each individual agent a current indicator of the individual agent's overall performance. Each individual agent's current indicator of overall performance is fed 5 back to the individual agent, preferably through the agent's telecommunications terminal. For example, the current indicator is constantly displayed on the terminal.
The procedure is performed repetitively.
In accordance with one aspect of the invention there is provided an arrangement for providing performance feedback to telemarketing agents, 10 comprising: first means for repeatedly obtaining a current measure of quantitative performance of each agent during a workday of the agent; second means for repeatedly obtaining a current measure of qualitative performance of each agent;third means for using the obtained current measure of the qualitative performance and the obtained current measure of the quantitative performance for each individual 15 agent repeatedly to derive for each individual agent a current indicator of overall performance of said individual agent during the workday of the individual agent; and fourth means for repeatedly feeding back each individual agent's current indicator of the overall performance to the individual agent during the workday of the individual agent, thereby to provide each individual agent with substantially real-time 20 up-to-date feedback on the individual agent's overall performance.
In accordance with another aspect of the invention there is provided a method of providing performance feedback to telemarketing agents, corriprising the steps of: repeatedly obtaining a current measure of quantitative performance of each agent during a workday of the agent; repeatedly obtaining a current measure of 25 qualitative performance of each agent; using the obtained current measure of the qualitative performance and the obtained current measure of the quantitative perforrnance for each individual agent repeatedly to derive for each individual agent a current indicator of the individual agent's overall performance of the individual agent during the workday of the individual agent; and repeatedly feeding back each 30 individual agent's current indicator of the overall performance to the individual agent repeatedly during the workday of the individual agent, thereby to provide each individual agent with substantially real-time up-to-date feedback on the individual agent's overall performance.
In an illustrative embodiment of the invention, a factor representative of 35 current qualitative performance of each agent is repeatedly obtained and eachincrement in quantitative performance of each agent is measured. Each measured ~, ~i 205~749 - 2a-increment for each individual agent is then modified by the factor for the individual agent so as to obtain a weighted increment for the individual agent. The obtained increment for each individual agent is then added to a sum of previously-obtained weighted increments for the individual agent to derive for each individual agent a current indicator of the individual agent's overall performance. Each individualagent's current indicator is then electronically constantly reported to the individual agent through their telecommunications terminal.
Every agent thereby constantly receives an up-to-date indication of their performance preferably in terrns of both quantitative and qualitative criteria. This feedback serves to motivate the agents in their endeavours and to improve their performance.
These and other advantages and features of the invention will become - apparent from the following description of an illustrative embodiment of the invention taken together with the drawing.
Brief Description of the Drawin~
FIG. 1 is a block diagram of an ACD system that includes an illustrative embodiment of the invention;
FIG. 2 is a diagram of an agent status table of the system of FIG. 1;
FIG. 3 is a flow diagram of an agent log-in routine of the system of FIG. 1;
FIG. 4 is a flow diagram of a call-completion routine of the system of FIG. 1;
FIG. 5 is a flow diagram of a supervisor-evaluation routine of the system of FIG. 1; and 2~537~i FIG. 6 is a flow diagram of an agent log-off routine of the system of FIG. 1.
Detailed Description FIG. 1 shows in block form an illustrative example of an ACD system.
5 An ACD system is a telemarketing system wherein calls are distributed automatically among agents. The system comprises a plurality of telecommunication terminals 110, each staffed by an agent 111, connected to a switching system 100 which is in turn connected to a plurality of telecommunication links 103. Each terminal 110 is illustratively a data terminal and a telephone set, or a 10 telephone set with a data display. Switching system 100 is illustratively a PBX, such as the AT&T System 85 or Definity~ PBX. Links 103 are illustratively telephony lines and trunks that connect switching system 100 to the public telephone system (not shown). Optionally, also connected to switching system 100 is an adjunct processor 140. Adjunct processor 140 is a record-keeping and report-generating 15 system for switching system 100 functions, such as the CMS adjunct processor of AT&T. Switching system 100 includes, and is operated under control of, a processor 101 that executes an ACD program 102 which is stored in its memory 104.
Illustratively, processor 101 causes incoming calls to be distributed and connected to idle terminals 110, and to be queued up for distribution when no terminals 110 are 20 idle. Alternatively, processor 101 generates outgoing calls, and causes the generated calls to be distributed and connected to idle termin~lc 110. For each call, processor 101 generates a record of information, referred to hereinafter as switch-related information. Switch-related information includes, for example, the telephone number of the party to the call, and the number of presently queued calls.
25 Processor 101 sends the switch-related information along with the corresponding call to the terminal 110 to which the call is connected, for display on that terminal's display 112.
Also connected to switching system 100 is a supervisory terminal 120 operated by a supervisor 121. Through supervisory t--rrnin~l 120, supervisor 121 can 30 listen in on calls being handled at terminals 110 by agents 111, and can provide input to processor 101 to affect the operation of the ACD system of FIG. 1.
As described so far, the system of FIG. 1 is conventional. According to an illustrative example of the invention, the conventional system is modified byadding to ACD program 102 in memory 104 the data structure 200 and routines 230,35 240, 250, and 260 shown in FIGS. 2-6.
4 2~)~;374S
An agent status table 200, shown in FIG. 2 is kept in a memory of processor 101. Table 200 contains a plurality of entries 201, one for each person that can serve as an agent 111. Each entry contains a plurality of data fields 210-214. An agent I.D. field 210 identifies the person who is the corresponding agent 111. AS terminal I.D. field 211 identifies the terminal 110 which the corresponding agent 111 is using. A number-of-calls field 212 is a cumulative count of the calls handled by the corresponding agent 111. Alternatively, field 212 may contain some other objective, quantitative, measure of agent performance, e.g., the number or dollar value of sales made. A quality-factor field 213 stores a value that represents a10 subjective, qualitative, measure of agent performance. And a bonus points field 214 stores a value that represents the number of bonus points earned towards, e.g., a prize by the agent. The value stored in bonus points field 201 is arrived at through some combination of the values in quality-factor field 213 and number-of-calls field 212;
illustratively, each increment in value to field 212 is multiplied by the value of 15 field 213 and the result is added to the value in field 214. Illustratively, table 200 is initialized with fields 210 filled in with agent I.D.s, fields 211, 212, and 214 zeroed.
and fields 213 set to a value representative of average quality, e.g., one.
When an agent 111 successfully logs in on the system of FIG. 1, routine 230 of FIG. 3 is invoked and executed. Upon its invocation, at step 300,20 routine 230 identifies the terminal 110 on which that agent 111 logged in, atstep 301. Routine 230 then searches through table 200 to find the entry 201 whose agent I.D. field 210 contains the I.D. -- illustratively the login -- of that agent, at step 302. This entry 201 is that agent's associated entry. Routine 230 enters the I.D.
of the terminal 110 on which the agent 111 logged in into terminal I.D. field 211 of 25 the agent's associated entry 201, at step 307, and then returns to the point of its invocation, at step 308. In this manner, a tennin~l 110 becomes associated with an agent 111, and calls handled at that terminal 110 come to be credited to that agent 111.
When handling of a call is completed at a terminal 110, the indication of 30 call completion serves to invoke execution of routine 240 of FIG. 4. Upon itsinvocation, at step 500, routine 240 identifies the terminal 110 at which the call completion occurred, at step 501. Routine 240 then searches table 200 for the entry 201 that has that terminal's I.D. stored in its terminal I.D. field 211, at step 502. Upon finding that entry 201, routine 240 increments the contents of 35 number-of-calls field 212 by the value assigned to the completion of a single call, e.g., by one, at step 503, thereby crediting the entry's associated agent 111 with the 5 2Q~3~
call completion. Routine 240 also multiplies the single call completion value by the factor stored in quality factor field 213, at step 504, and adds the result to the contents of bonus points field 214, at step 505, thereby awarding bonus points towards a prize to the agent who handled the call. Routine 240 then retrieves from 5 the table 200 entry 201 the contents of bonus points field 214 and terminal I.D.
field 211, at step 506, and forwards the contents of field 214 to ACD program 102 with a command to send them to the terminal 110 identified by contents of the retrieved terminal I.D. field 211, at step 507. Routine 240 then returns to the point of its invocation, at step 508.
ACD program 102 responds to the command by sending the contents of bonus points field 214 to the destination terminal 110, where they are displayed on that terminal's display 112. The agent 111 who is working at the destination terminal 110 thereby receives a continuous and up-to-date indication of the bonus points that he or she has earned so far. The real-time and up-to-date feedback so 15 received serves to motivate the agent 111.
To evaluate the quality of call handling exhibited by agents 111, supervisor 121 occasionally monitors calls being handled by individual agents 111.
As shown in dashed lines in FIG. 5, supervisor 121 elects to monitor an agent's h~nflling of calls at a selected terminal 110, at step 600, proceeds to monitor that 20 agent, in a conventional manner, at step 601, and evaluates the agent's p~ mance in handling the monitored calls, at step 601. The evaluation may be based on anynumber of factors, principally subjective ones, such as courteousness, professionalism, speed and accuracy of response, etc. Supervisor 121 then inputs on terminal 120 a quality factor representative of the evaluation, at step 602.
25 Illustratively, a quality factor of N (a positive number) is given to an agent 111 exhibiting average quality in h~n(lling calls, a quality factor of less than N is given to an agent 111 exhibiting below-average quality in h~n-1ling calls, and a quality factor of greater than N is given to an agent 111 exhibiting above-average quality in h~n~lling calls.
Input of the quality factor by supervisor 121 triggers execution of routine 250 of FIG. 5. Upon its invocation, at step 602, routine 250 identifies the terminal 110 which supervisor 121 had monitored, at step 603, and then searches table 200 to find therein entry 201 which contains that terminal's I.D. in terminal I.D. field 211, at step 604. Upon finding that entry 201, routine 250 stores thequality factor which had been entered by supervisor 121 in quality factor field 213, at step 605, thereby associating the quality factor with the agent 111 that had been 2~7~
An agent status table 200, shown in FIG. 2 is kept in a memory of processor 101. Table 200 contains a plurality of entries 201, one for each person that can serve as an agent 111. Each entry contains a plurality of data fields 210-214. An agent I.D. field 210 identifies the person who is the corresponding agent 111. AS terminal I.D. field 211 identifies the terminal 110 which the corresponding agent 111 is using. A number-of-calls field 212 is a cumulative count of the calls handled by the corresponding agent 111. Alternatively, field 212 may contain some other objective, quantitative, measure of agent performance, e.g., the number or dollar value of sales made. A quality-factor field 213 stores a value that represents a10 subjective, qualitative, measure of agent performance. And a bonus points field 214 stores a value that represents the number of bonus points earned towards, e.g., a prize by the agent. The value stored in bonus points field 201 is arrived at through some combination of the values in quality-factor field 213 and number-of-calls field 212;
illustratively, each increment in value to field 212 is multiplied by the value of 15 field 213 and the result is added to the value in field 214. Illustratively, table 200 is initialized with fields 210 filled in with agent I.D.s, fields 211, 212, and 214 zeroed.
and fields 213 set to a value representative of average quality, e.g., one.
When an agent 111 successfully logs in on the system of FIG. 1, routine 230 of FIG. 3 is invoked and executed. Upon its invocation, at step 300,20 routine 230 identifies the terminal 110 on which that agent 111 logged in, atstep 301. Routine 230 then searches through table 200 to find the entry 201 whose agent I.D. field 210 contains the I.D. -- illustratively the login -- of that agent, at step 302. This entry 201 is that agent's associated entry. Routine 230 enters the I.D.
of the terminal 110 on which the agent 111 logged in into terminal I.D. field 211 of 25 the agent's associated entry 201, at step 307, and then returns to the point of its invocation, at step 308. In this manner, a tennin~l 110 becomes associated with an agent 111, and calls handled at that terminal 110 come to be credited to that agent 111.
When handling of a call is completed at a terminal 110, the indication of 30 call completion serves to invoke execution of routine 240 of FIG. 4. Upon itsinvocation, at step 500, routine 240 identifies the terminal 110 at which the call completion occurred, at step 501. Routine 240 then searches table 200 for the entry 201 that has that terminal's I.D. stored in its terminal I.D. field 211, at step 502. Upon finding that entry 201, routine 240 increments the contents of 35 number-of-calls field 212 by the value assigned to the completion of a single call, e.g., by one, at step 503, thereby crediting the entry's associated agent 111 with the 5 2Q~3~
call completion. Routine 240 also multiplies the single call completion value by the factor stored in quality factor field 213, at step 504, and adds the result to the contents of bonus points field 214, at step 505, thereby awarding bonus points towards a prize to the agent who handled the call. Routine 240 then retrieves from 5 the table 200 entry 201 the contents of bonus points field 214 and terminal I.D.
field 211, at step 506, and forwards the contents of field 214 to ACD program 102 with a command to send them to the terminal 110 identified by contents of the retrieved terminal I.D. field 211, at step 507. Routine 240 then returns to the point of its invocation, at step 508.
ACD program 102 responds to the command by sending the contents of bonus points field 214 to the destination terminal 110, where they are displayed on that terminal's display 112. The agent 111 who is working at the destination terminal 110 thereby receives a continuous and up-to-date indication of the bonus points that he or she has earned so far. The real-time and up-to-date feedback so 15 received serves to motivate the agent 111.
To evaluate the quality of call handling exhibited by agents 111, supervisor 121 occasionally monitors calls being handled by individual agents 111.
As shown in dashed lines in FIG. 5, supervisor 121 elects to monitor an agent's h~nflling of calls at a selected terminal 110, at step 600, proceeds to monitor that 20 agent, in a conventional manner, at step 601, and evaluates the agent's p~ mance in handling the monitored calls, at step 601. The evaluation may be based on anynumber of factors, principally subjective ones, such as courteousness, professionalism, speed and accuracy of response, etc. Supervisor 121 then inputs on terminal 120 a quality factor representative of the evaluation, at step 602.
25 Illustratively, a quality factor of N (a positive number) is given to an agent 111 exhibiting average quality in h~n(lling calls, a quality factor of less than N is given to an agent 111 exhibiting below-average quality in h~n-1ling calls, and a quality factor of greater than N is given to an agent 111 exhibiting above-average quality in h~n~lling calls.
Input of the quality factor by supervisor 121 triggers execution of routine 250 of FIG. 5. Upon its invocation, at step 602, routine 250 identifies the terminal 110 which supervisor 121 had monitored, at step 603, and then searches table 200 to find therein entry 201 which contains that terminal's I.D. in terminal I.D. field 211, at step 604. Upon finding that entry 201, routine 250 stores thequality factor which had been entered by supervisor 121 in quality factor field 213, at step 605, thereby associating the quality factor with the agent 111 that had been 2~7~
evaluated. Routine 250 then returns to the point of its invocation.
When an agent 111 logs off of the system of FIG. 1, routine 260 of FIG. 6 is invoked and executed. Upon its invocation, at step 700, routine 260 identifies the terminal 110 on which that agent 111 logged off, at step 701.
S Routine 260 then searches through table 200 to find the entry 201 whose tçrmin~l I.D. field 211 contains the I.D. of the logging-off terminal 110, at step 702.
Routine 260 retrieves contents of fields 210, 212, and 214 of that entry 201, atstep 607, and sends them to some reporting function, e.g., CMS adjunct processor 140, at step 704. The reporting function maintains a record of the number 10 of calls handled and bonus points earned for each agent 110, and reports this information to supervisor 121 on demand.
Next, routine 260 clears terminal I.D. field 211 of the found entry 201, at step 705, thereby disassociating agent 111 from terminal 110. At step 705, routine 260 may or may not also clear contents of fields 212 and 214, depending 15 upon whether it is desired that table 200 carry only daily information or cumulative information of agents' performance. After step 705, routine 260 returns to the point of its invocation, at step 706. The terminal and the agent are now both free to become associated with a different agent and terminal, respectively.
Of course, it should be understood that various changes and 20 modifications may be made to the above-described illustrative embodiment of the invention. For example, not only the contents of the bonus points field, but also the contents of the number-of-calls and quality factor fields, may be sent to and displayed for agents on their terminal displays. Or, audible motivational feedback may be added to the visual, e.g., a bell may be rung at the agent's terminal when the 25 agent accllm~ tes enough bonus points to win a prize. Furthermore, the quantitative measure of performance may be based on transaction events other than calls, such as sales made, or questions answered. Each agent terrnin~l may have event buttons, one for each type of event, and the agent presses the corresponding button when theyhave handled an event of that type in order to report the handling of the event to the 30 ACD system. The different types of events may each have different bonus pointvalues, and each may have a different qualitative factor associated with it. Such changes and modifications can be made without departing from the spirit and the scope of the invention. It is therefore intended that such changes and modifications be covered by the following claims.
When an agent 111 logs off of the system of FIG. 1, routine 260 of FIG. 6 is invoked and executed. Upon its invocation, at step 700, routine 260 identifies the terminal 110 on which that agent 111 logged off, at step 701.
S Routine 260 then searches through table 200 to find the entry 201 whose tçrmin~l I.D. field 211 contains the I.D. of the logging-off terminal 110, at step 702.
Routine 260 retrieves contents of fields 210, 212, and 214 of that entry 201, atstep 607, and sends them to some reporting function, e.g., CMS adjunct processor 140, at step 704. The reporting function maintains a record of the number 10 of calls handled and bonus points earned for each agent 110, and reports this information to supervisor 121 on demand.
Next, routine 260 clears terminal I.D. field 211 of the found entry 201, at step 705, thereby disassociating agent 111 from terminal 110. At step 705, routine 260 may or may not also clear contents of fields 212 and 214, depending 15 upon whether it is desired that table 200 carry only daily information or cumulative information of agents' performance. After step 705, routine 260 returns to the point of its invocation, at step 706. The terminal and the agent are now both free to become associated with a different agent and terminal, respectively.
Of course, it should be understood that various changes and 20 modifications may be made to the above-described illustrative embodiment of the invention. For example, not only the contents of the bonus points field, but also the contents of the number-of-calls and quality factor fields, may be sent to and displayed for agents on their terminal displays. Or, audible motivational feedback may be added to the visual, e.g., a bell may be rung at the agent's terminal when the 25 agent accllm~ tes enough bonus points to win a prize. Furthermore, the quantitative measure of performance may be based on transaction events other than calls, such as sales made, or questions answered. Each agent terrnin~l may have event buttons, one for each type of event, and the agent presses the corresponding button when theyhave handled an event of that type in order to report the handling of the event to the 30 ACD system. The different types of events may each have different bonus pointvalues, and each may have a different qualitative factor associated with it. Such changes and modifications can be made without departing from the spirit and the scope of the invention. It is therefore intended that such changes and modifications be covered by the following claims.
Claims (12)
1. An arrangement for providing performance feedback to telemarketing agents, comprising:
first means for repeatedly obtaining a current measure of quantitative performance of each agent during a workday of the agent;
second means for repeatedly obtaining a current measure of qualitative performance of each agent;
third means for using the obtained current measure of the qualitative performance and the obtained current measure of the quantitative performance foreach individual agent repeatedly to derive for each individual agent a current indicator of overall performance of said individual agent during the workday of the individual agent; and fourth means for repeatedly feeding back each individual agent's current indicator of the overall performance to the individual agent during the workday of the individual agent, thereby to provide each individual agent with substantially real-time up-to-date feedback on the individual agent's overall performance.
first means for repeatedly obtaining a current measure of quantitative performance of each agent during a workday of the agent;
second means for repeatedly obtaining a current measure of qualitative performance of each agent;
third means for using the obtained current measure of the qualitative performance and the obtained current measure of the quantitative performance foreach individual agent repeatedly to derive for each individual agent a current indicator of overall performance of said individual agent during the workday of the individual agent; and fourth means for repeatedly feeding back each individual agent's current indicator of the overall performance to the individual agent during the workday of the individual agent, thereby to provide each individual agent with substantially real-time up-to-date feedback on the individual agent's overall performance.
2. The arrangement of claim 1 wherein:
the first means comprising means for measuring for each agent each increment in the quantitative performance of the agent;
the second means comprising means for repeatedly obtaining for each agent a factor representative of current said qualitative performance of the agent;
the third means comprising means for modifying each measured increment for each individual agent by the factor for the individual agent to obtain a weighted increment for the individual agent, and adding the obtained weighted increment for each individual agent to a sum of previously-obtained weighted increments for the individual agent to derive for each individual agent a current indicator of the individual agent's said overall performance; and the fourth means comprising means for electronically reporting each individual agent's said current indicator to the individual agent through a telecommunications terminal of the individual agent.
the first means comprising means for measuring for each agent each increment in the quantitative performance of the agent;
the second means comprising means for repeatedly obtaining for each agent a factor representative of current said qualitative performance of the agent;
the third means comprising means for modifying each measured increment for each individual agent by the factor for the individual agent to obtain a weighted increment for the individual agent, and adding the obtained weighted increment for each individual agent to a sum of previously-obtained weighted increments for the individual agent to derive for each individual agent a current indicator of the individual agent's said overall performance; and the fourth means comprising means for electronically reporting each individual agent's said current indicator to the individual agent through a telecommunications terminal of the individual agent.
3. The arrangement of claim 1 wherein:
the first means comprising means for determining, for each agent, a first increment in a first cumulative measure of transaction events completed by the agent;
the second means comprising means for obtaining, for each agent, a numerical factor representative of a supervisor's current evaluation of the agent's performance;
the third means comprising means for multiplying, for each agent, the first increment by the numerical factor to obtain a second increment for a second cumulative measure of the agent's said overall performance and adding the secondincrement to the second cumulative measure to obtain a current cumulative measure of the agent's said overall performance; and the fourth means comprising means for electronically reporting, to each agent, the current cumulative measure of the agent's said overall performance.
the first means comprising means for determining, for each agent, a first increment in a first cumulative measure of transaction events completed by the agent;
the second means comprising means for obtaining, for each agent, a numerical factor representative of a supervisor's current evaluation of the agent's performance;
the third means comprising means for multiplying, for each agent, the first increment by the numerical factor to obtain a second increment for a second cumulative measure of the agent's said overall performance and adding the secondincrement to the second cumulative measure to obtain a current cumulative measure of the agent's said overall performance; and the fourth means comprising means for electronically reporting, to each agent, the current cumulative measure of the agent's said overall performance.
4. The arrangement of claim 1 wherein:
the first through the fourth means operate substantially immediately following every change in the individual agent's measure of performance.
the first through the fourth means operate substantially immediately following every change in the individual agent's measure of performance.
5. The arrangement of claim 1 wherein:
the third means derive the current indicator of overall performance for the individual agent and the fourth means feed back the individual agent's current indicator substantially immediately following every change in the individual agent's obtained current measure of performance.
the third means derive the current indicator of overall performance for the individual agent and the fourth means feed back the individual agent's current indicator substantially immediately following every change in the individual agent's obtained current measure of performance.
6. An arrangement for providing performance feedback to agents in an automatic call distribution system having a plurality of telecommunication terminals for use by the agents and means for connecting calls to the terminals, comprising:
means for storing, for each agent, a record of a number of transaction events completed by the agent, a quality factor currently assigned to the agent, and a current measure of cumulative overall performance of the agent;
means, responsive to assignment of a new quality factor to the agent, for effecting storage of a record of the new quality factor in the storing means in place of the record of the quality factor heretofore stored for the agent in the storing means;
means, substantially immediately responsive to completion of a transaction event by the agent, for incrementing the record of the number of transaction events completed by the agent;
means, substantially immediately responsive either to incrementation of the record of the number of transaction events completed by the agent or to storage of the record of the new quality factor, for multiplying the increment by the quality factor and incrementing the record of the current measure of the cumulative overall performance by a result of the multiplication to obtain a record of a new current measure of the cumulative overall performance; and means, substantially immediately responsive to obtaining of the record of the new current measure of the cumulative overall performance, for electronically sending the record of the new current measure of the cumulative overall performance to a display of a terminal of the agent to visually report the new current measure to the agent, thereby to provide the agent with substantially real-time up-to-date feedback on the agent's overall performance.
means for storing, for each agent, a record of a number of transaction events completed by the agent, a quality factor currently assigned to the agent, and a current measure of cumulative overall performance of the agent;
means, responsive to assignment of a new quality factor to the agent, for effecting storage of a record of the new quality factor in the storing means in place of the record of the quality factor heretofore stored for the agent in the storing means;
means, substantially immediately responsive to completion of a transaction event by the agent, for incrementing the record of the number of transaction events completed by the agent;
means, substantially immediately responsive either to incrementation of the record of the number of transaction events completed by the agent or to storage of the record of the new quality factor, for multiplying the increment by the quality factor and incrementing the record of the current measure of the cumulative overall performance by a result of the multiplication to obtain a record of a new current measure of the cumulative overall performance; and means, substantially immediately responsive to obtaining of the record of the new current measure of the cumulative overall performance, for electronically sending the record of the new current measure of the cumulative overall performance to a display of a terminal of the agent to visually report the new current measure to the agent, thereby to provide the agent with substantially real-time up-to-date feedback on the agent's overall performance.
7. A method of providing performance feedback to telemarketing agents, comprising the steps of:
repeatedly obtaining a current measure of quantitative performance of each agent during a workday of the agent;
repeatedly obtaining a current measure of qualitative performance of each agent;
using the obtained current measure of the qualitative performance and the obtained current measure of the quantitative performance for each individual agent repeatedly to derive for each individual agent a current indicator of the individual agent's overall performance of the individual agent during the workday of the individual agent; and repeatedly feeding back each individual agent's current indicator of the overall performance to the individual agent repeatedly during the workday of theindividual agent, thereby to provide each individual agent with substantially real-time up-to-date feedback on the individual agent's overall performance.
repeatedly obtaining a current measure of quantitative performance of each agent during a workday of the agent;
repeatedly obtaining a current measure of qualitative performance of each agent;
using the obtained current measure of the qualitative performance and the obtained current measure of the quantitative performance for each individual agent repeatedly to derive for each individual agent a current indicator of the individual agent's overall performance of the individual agent during the workday of the individual agent; and repeatedly feeding back each individual agent's current indicator of the overall performance to the individual agent repeatedly during the workday of theindividual agent, thereby to provide each individual agent with substantially real-time up-to-date feedback on the individual agent's overall performance.
8. The method of claim 7 wherein the step of repeatedly obtaining a current measure of quantitative performance comprises the step of measuring for each agent each increment in the quantitative performance of the agent;
the step of repeatedly obtaining a current measure of qualitative performance comprises the step of repeatedly obtaining for each agent a factor representative of current said qualitative performance of the agent;
the step of using the obtained current measures comprises the steps of modifying each measured increment for each individual agent by the factor for the individual agent to obtain a weighted increment for the individual agent, and adding the obtained weighted increment for each individual agent to a sum of previously-obtained weighted increments for the individual agent to derive for each individual agent a current indicator of the individual agent's said overall performance; and the step of repeatedly feeding back comprises the step of electronically reporting each individual agent's said current indicator to the individual agent through a telecommunications terminal of the individual agent.
the step of repeatedly obtaining a current measure of qualitative performance comprises the step of repeatedly obtaining for each agent a factor representative of current said qualitative performance of the agent;
the step of using the obtained current measures comprises the steps of modifying each measured increment for each individual agent by the factor for the individual agent to obtain a weighted increment for the individual agent, and adding the obtained weighted increment for each individual agent to a sum of previously-obtained weighted increments for the individual agent to derive for each individual agent a current indicator of the individual agent's said overall performance; and the step of repeatedly feeding back comprises the step of electronically reporting each individual agent's said current indicator to the individual agent through a telecommunications terminal of the individual agent.
9. The method of claim 7 wherein:
the step of repeatedly obtaining a current measure of quantitative performance comprises the step of determining, for each agent, a first increment in a first cumulative measure of transaction events completed by the agent;
the step of obtaining a current measure of qualitative performance comprises the step of obtaining for each agent, a numerical factor representative of a supervisor's current evaluation of the agent's performance;
the step of using the obtained current measures comprises the steps of multiplying, for each agent, the first increment by the numerical factor to obtain a second increment for a second cumulative measure of the agent's said overall performance; and adding, for each agent, the second increment to the second cumulative measure to obtain a current cumulative measure of the agent's said overall performance; and the step of repeatedly feeding back comprises the step of reporting electronically, to each agent, the current cumulative measure of the agent's said overall performance.
the step of repeatedly obtaining a current measure of quantitative performance comprises the step of determining, for each agent, a first increment in a first cumulative measure of transaction events completed by the agent;
the step of obtaining a current measure of qualitative performance comprises the step of obtaining for each agent, a numerical factor representative of a supervisor's current evaluation of the agent's performance;
the step of using the obtained current measures comprises the steps of multiplying, for each agent, the first increment by the numerical factor to obtain a second increment for a second cumulative measure of the agent's said overall performance; and adding, for each agent, the second increment to the second cumulative measure to obtain a current cumulative measure of the agent's said overall performance; and the step of repeatedly feeding back comprises the step of reporting electronically, to each agent, the current cumulative measure of the agent's said overall performance.
10. The method of claim 7 wherein:
the steps of claim 7 singly perform their functions substantially immediately following every change in the individual agent's measure of performance.
the steps of claim 7 singly perform their functions substantially immediately following every change in the individual agent's measure of performance.
11. The method of claim 7 wherein:
the current indicator of overall performance for the individual agent is derived and fed back to the individual agent substantially immediately followingevery change in the individual agent's obtained current measure of performance.
the current indicator of overall performance for the individual agent is derived and fed back to the individual agent substantially immediately followingevery change in the individual agent's obtained current measure of performance.
12. A method of performance feedback to agents in an automatic call distribution system having a plurality of telecommunication terminals for use by the agents and means for connecting calls to the terminals, comprising the steps of:initially storing, for each agent, a record of a number of transaction events completed by the agent, a quality factor currently assigned to the agent, and a current measure of cumulative overall performance of the agent;
effecting storage of a record of a new quality factor in place of the record of the quality factor heretofore stored for the agent, in response to assignment of the new quality factor to the agent;
incrementing the record of the number of transaction events completed by the agent, substantially immediately in response to completion of a transaction event by the agent;
multiplying the increment by the quality factor, substantially immediately in response either to incrementing of the record of the number of transaction events completed by the agent or to storage of the record of the new quality factor;
incrementing the record of the current measure of the cumulative overall performance by a result of the multiplication step, substantially immediately inresponse to multiplying of the increment by the quality factor, to obtain a record of a new current measure of the cumulative overall performance; and electronically sending the record of the new current measure of the cumulative overall performance to a display of a terminal of the agent to visually report the new current measure to the agent substantially immediately in response to obtaining the record of the new current measure of the cumulative overall performance, thereby to provide the agent with substantially real-time up-to-date feedback on the agent's overall performance.
effecting storage of a record of a new quality factor in place of the record of the quality factor heretofore stored for the agent, in response to assignment of the new quality factor to the agent;
incrementing the record of the number of transaction events completed by the agent, substantially immediately in response to completion of a transaction event by the agent;
multiplying the increment by the quality factor, substantially immediately in response either to incrementing of the record of the number of transaction events completed by the agent or to storage of the record of the new quality factor;
incrementing the record of the current measure of the cumulative overall performance by a result of the multiplication step, substantially immediately inresponse to multiplying of the increment by the quality factor, to obtain a record of a new current measure of the cumulative overall performance; and electronically sending the record of the new current measure of the cumulative overall performance to a display of a terminal of the agent to visually report the new current measure to the agent substantially immediately in response to obtaining the record of the new current measure of the cumulative overall performance, thereby to provide the agent with substantially real-time up-to-date feedback on the agent's overall performance.
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| US637,382 | 1991-01-03 | ||
| US07/637,382 US5239460A (en) | 1991-01-03 | 1991-01-03 | Arrangement for motivating telemarketing agents |
Publications (2)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| CA2053745A1 CA2053745A1 (en) | 1992-07-04 |
| CA2053745C true CA2053745C (en) | 1997-09-09 |
Family
ID=24555685
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| CA002053745A Expired - Fee Related CA2053745C (en) | 1991-01-03 | 1991-10-18 | Arrangement for motivating telemarketing agents |
Country Status (2)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| US (1) | US5239460A (en) |
| CA (1) | CA2053745C (en) |
Families Citing this family (168)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| WO1995012175A1 (en) * | 1993-10-26 | 1995-05-04 | Radisson Hotels International, Inc. | System and method for awarding credits to persons who book travel-related reservations |
| US5751795A (en) * | 1995-08-11 | 1998-05-12 | Lucent Technologies Inc. | Broadcasting of information through telephone switching system display messages |
| US5842181A (en) * | 1995-10-27 | 1998-11-24 | Fanjoy; Logan M. | Remote hand-held time tracking device and method therefor |
| US5924073A (en) * | 1995-11-14 | 1999-07-13 | Beacon Patient Physician Association, Llc | System and method for assessing physician performance using robust multivariate techniques of statistical analysis |
| US5774870A (en) * | 1995-12-14 | 1998-06-30 | Netcentives, Inc. | Fully integrated, on-line interactive frequency and award redemption program |
| JP3318484B2 (en) * | 1996-04-26 | 2002-08-26 | 富士通株式会社 | Group silent monitor control method |
| US5790798A (en) * | 1996-05-31 | 1998-08-04 | Witness Systems, Inc. | Method and apparatus for simultaneously monitoring computer user screen and telephone activity from a remote location |
| US8861707B2 (en) * | 1996-05-31 | 2014-10-14 | Verint Americas Inc. | Method and apparatus for simultaneously monitoring computer user screen and telephone activity from a remote location |
| GB2347312B (en) * | 1996-06-14 | 2000-10-25 | Fujitsu Ltd | Telephone transaction support system |
| GB2314233B (en) | 1996-06-14 | 2000-08-02 | Fujitsu Ltd | Telephone transaction support system |
| US5764728A (en) * | 1996-06-28 | 1998-06-09 | Mitel Corporation | Silent monitoring agent IDs |
| US5903877A (en) * | 1996-09-30 | 1999-05-11 | Lucent Technologies Inc. | Transaction center for processing customer transaction requests from alternative media sources |
| US6009162A (en) * | 1996-10-31 | 1999-12-28 | Lucent Technologies Inc. | Telecommunication feature for exchange of translation information between a computer and a telecommunication switching system |
| US5924072A (en) * | 1997-01-06 | 1999-07-13 | Electronic Data Systems Corporation | Knowledge management system and method |
| US5898772A (en) * | 1997-05-29 | 1999-04-27 | Lucent Technologies Inc. | Logical PC agent |
| US6292830B1 (en) * | 1997-08-08 | 2001-09-18 | Iterations Llc | System for optimizing interaction among agents acting on multiple levels |
| US6226621B1 (en) * | 1998-03-27 | 2001-05-01 | Brad P. Warsh | System and method for administration of awards program |
| US6049779A (en) * | 1998-04-06 | 2000-04-11 | Berkson; Stephen P. | Call center incentive system and method |
| US6363145B1 (en) | 1998-08-17 | 2002-03-26 | Siemens Information And Communication Networks, Inc. | Apparatus and method for automated voice analysis in ACD silent call monitoring |
| US6310951B1 (en) * | 1998-09-25 | 2001-10-30 | Ser Solutions, Inc. | Reassignment of agents |
| AUPQ193199A0 (en) * | 1999-07-30 | 1999-08-26 | Da Vinci Innovation Pty Limited | Apparatus and method for implementing surveys |
| US20040202309A1 (en) * | 1999-11-16 | 2004-10-14 | Knowlagent, Inc. | Managing the rate of delivering performance interventions in a contact center |
| US20040202308A1 (en) * | 1999-11-16 | 2004-10-14 | Knowlagent, Inc. | Managing the selection of performance interventions in a contact center |
| US20050175971A1 (en) * | 1999-11-16 | 2005-08-11 | Knowlagent, Inc., Alpharetta, Ga | Method and system for scheduled delivery of training to call center agents |
| US20060233346A1 (en) * | 1999-11-16 | 2006-10-19 | Knowlagent, Inc. | Method and system for prioritizing performance interventions |
| US7587041B2 (en) * | 2000-01-13 | 2009-09-08 | Verint Americas Inc. | System and method for analysing communications streams |
| GB0000735D0 (en) | 2000-01-13 | 2000-03-08 | Eyretel Ltd | System and method for analysing communication streams |
| US20010034632A1 (en) * | 2000-01-28 | 2001-10-25 | Wilkinson William T. | Research and development process |
| US6775377B2 (en) * | 2001-09-10 | 2004-08-10 | Knowlagent, Inc. | Method and system for delivery of individualized training to call center agents |
| US7043193B1 (en) * | 2000-05-09 | 2006-05-09 | Knowlagent, Inc. | Versatile resource computer-based training system |
| US8359231B2 (en) | 2000-05-16 | 2013-01-22 | Maritz Holdings Inc. | Method and system for electronically selecting, modifying, and operating a motivation or recognition program |
| US7617114B1 (en) | 2000-08-10 | 2009-11-10 | Wellpoint Inc. | Health care reimbursement |
| US20020035529A1 (en) * | 2000-08-10 | 2002-03-21 | Tooke Charlton Clinton | Managing health care resources |
| US20020024531A1 (en) * | 2000-08-30 | 2002-02-28 | Herrell William R. | Method for evaluating employees and aggregating their respective skills and experience in a searchable database for sharing knowledge resources |
| US7325190B1 (en) | 2000-10-02 | 2008-01-29 | Boehmer Tiffany D | Interface system and method of building rules and constraints for a resource scheduling system |
| US7249145B1 (en) | 2000-10-13 | 2007-07-24 | General Electric Company | Methods and apparatus for selecting candidates to interview |
| US6857567B2 (en) * | 2000-10-17 | 2005-02-22 | Psc Scanning, Inc. | System and method for training and monitoring data reader operators |
| US7092506B1 (en) * | 2000-10-23 | 2006-08-15 | Verizon Corporate Services Group Inc. | Systems and methods for providing audio information to service agents |
| GB0103381D0 (en) * | 2001-02-12 | 2001-03-28 | Eyretel Ltd | Packet data recording method and system |
| US20020123925A1 (en) * | 2001-03-01 | 2002-09-05 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method and system for automatically monitoring and rewarding the performance of support personnel in a remote service center |
| US8015042B2 (en) | 2001-04-02 | 2011-09-06 | Verint Americas Inc. | Methods for long-range contact center staff planning utilizing discrete event simulation |
| US6952732B2 (en) | 2001-04-30 | 2005-10-04 | Blue Pumpkin Software, Inc. | Method and apparatus for multi-contact scheduling |
| US7155399B2 (en) | 2001-04-03 | 2006-12-26 | Witness Systems, Inc. | System and method for complex schedule generation |
| US6959405B2 (en) | 2001-04-18 | 2005-10-25 | Blue Pumpkin Software, Inc. | Method and system for concurrent error identification in resource scheduling |
| US7222086B2 (en) * | 2001-05-02 | 2007-05-22 | Ncr Corp. | Systems and methods for providing performance feedback to a cashier at a point-of-sale terminal |
| US20020188511A1 (en) * | 2001-05-14 | 2002-12-12 | Trilegiant Loyalty Solutions | Interactive online point redemption system |
| US20020198773A1 (en) * | 2001-06-26 | 2002-12-26 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method and system for managing innovation by encouraging reusability and subsequent reuse of design components |
| US7386467B2 (en) * | 2001-08-28 | 2008-06-10 | Rockwell Electronic Commerce Corp. | Apparatus and method of maintaining and improving agent performance |
| US7174010B2 (en) * | 2001-11-05 | 2007-02-06 | Knowlagent, Inc. | System and method for increasing completion of training |
| AU2003212948A1 (en) * | 2002-02-07 | 2003-09-02 | Christian Nickerson | System and method for rapid claims submission and adjudication |
| FR2838213B1 (en) * | 2002-04-05 | 2005-12-23 | France Telecom | DEVICE AND METHOD FOR EVALUATING MAINTENANCE BETWEEN A CLIENT AND AN OPERATOR |
| GB0219493D0 (en) | 2002-08-21 | 2002-10-02 | Eyretel Plc | Method and system for communications monitoring |
| WO2004023372A2 (en) * | 2002-09-03 | 2004-03-18 | Waterfront Partners Llc | Points-based rewards automation system and method |
| US8572058B2 (en) * | 2002-11-27 | 2013-10-29 | Accenture Global Services Limited | Presenting linked information in a CRM system |
| US7502997B2 (en) * | 2002-11-27 | 2009-03-10 | Accenture Global Services Gmbh | Ensuring completeness when publishing to a content management system |
| US8275811B2 (en) * | 2002-11-27 | 2012-09-25 | Accenture Global Services Limited | Communicating solution information in a knowledge management system |
| US7769622B2 (en) * | 2002-11-27 | 2010-08-03 | Bt Group Plc | System and method for capturing and publishing insight of contact center users whose performance is above a reference key performance indicator |
| US7418403B2 (en) * | 2002-11-27 | 2008-08-26 | Bt Group Plc | Content feedback in a multiple-owner content management system |
| US9396473B2 (en) * | 2002-11-27 | 2016-07-19 | Accenture Global Services Limited | Searching within a contact center portal |
| US20040100493A1 (en) * | 2002-11-27 | 2004-05-27 | Reid Gregory S. | Dynamically ordering solutions |
| US20050014116A1 (en) * | 2002-11-27 | 2005-01-20 | Reid Gregory S. | Testing information comprehension of contact center users |
| US7158628B2 (en) * | 2003-08-20 | 2007-01-02 | Knowlagent, Inc. | Method and system for selecting a preferred contact center agent based on agent proficiency and performance and contact center state |
| US20060072739A1 (en) * | 2004-10-01 | 2006-04-06 | Knowlagent Inc. | Method and system for assessing and deploying personnel for roles in a contact center |
| US7680250B1 (en) | 2004-11-24 | 2010-03-16 | Interactive Quality Services | Interactive method and system of testing an automated call telephonic communication system |
| US20060136248A1 (en) * | 2004-12-21 | 2006-06-22 | Mary Kay Inc. | Computer techniques for distributing information |
| US20060153356A1 (en) * | 2005-01-13 | 2006-07-13 | Seatlink, Inc. | Contact-center routing based on incentives and/or agent preferences |
| US20060233349A1 (en) * | 2005-03-22 | 2006-10-19 | Cooper Kim A | Graphical tool, system, and method for visualizing agent performance |
| US20060256953A1 (en) * | 2005-05-12 | 2006-11-16 | Knowlagent, Inc. | Method and system for improving workforce performance in a contact center |
| US7995717B2 (en) | 2005-05-18 | 2011-08-09 | Mattersight Corporation | Method and system for analyzing separated voice data of a telephonic communication between a customer and a contact center by applying a psychological behavioral model thereto |
| US7511606B2 (en) | 2005-05-18 | 2009-03-31 | Lojack Operating Company Lp | Vehicle locating unit with input voltage protection |
| US8094790B2 (en) | 2005-05-18 | 2012-01-10 | Mattersight Corporation | Method and software for training a customer service representative by analysis of a telephonic interaction between a customer and a contact center |
| US8094803B2 (en) | 2005-05-18 | 2012-01-10 | Mattersight Corporation | Method and system for analyzing separated voice data of a telephonic communication between a customer and a contact center by applying a psychological behavioral model thereto |
| US7706520B1 (en) * | 2005-11-08 | 2010-04-27 | Liveops, Inc. | System and method for facilitating transcription of audio recordings, with auditing |
| US8670552B2 (en) | 2006-02-22 | 2014-03-11 | Verint Systems, Inc. | System and method for integrated display of multiple types of call agent data |
| US8108237B2 (en) * | 2006-02-22 | 2012-01-31 | Verint Americas, Inc. | Systems for integrating contact center monitoring, training and scheduling |
| US8160233B2 (en) * | 2006-02-22 | 2012-04-17 | Verint Americas Inc. | System and method for detecting and displaying business transactions |
| US7853006B1 (en) | 2006-02-22 | 2010-12-14 | Verint Americas Inc. | Systems and methods for scheduling call center agents using quality data and correlation-based discovery |
| US20070206767A1 (en) * | 2006-02-22 | 2007-09-06 | Witness Systems, Inc. | System and method for integrated display of recorded interactions and call agent data |
| US7864946B1 (en) | 2006-02-22 | 2011-01-04 | Verint Americas Inc. | Systems and methods for scheduling call center agents using quality data and correlation-based discovery |
| US8117064B2 (en) | 2006-02-22 | 2012-02-14 | Verint Americas, Inc. | Systems and methods for workforce optimization and analytics |
| US8112306B2 (en) * | 2006-02-22 | 2012-02-07 | Verint Americas, Inc. | System and method for facilitating triggers and workflows in workforce optimization |
| US8112298B2 (en) * | 2006-02-22 | 2012-02-07 | Verint Americas, Inc. | Systems and methods for workforce optimization |
| US7734783B1 (en) | 2006-03-21 | 2010-06-08 | Verint Americas Inc. | Systems and methods for determining allocations for distributed multi-site contact centers |
| US8126134B1 (en) | 2006-03-30 | 2012-02-28 | Verint Americas, Inc. | Systems and methods for scheduling of outbound agents |
| US7774854B1 (en) | 2006-03-31 | 2010-08-10 | Verint Americas Inc. | Systems and methods for protecting information |
| US8204056B2 (en) * | 2006-03-31 | 2012-06-19 | Verint Americas, Inc. | Systems and methods for endpoint recording using a media application server |
| US8594313B2 (en) | 2006-03-31 | 2013-11-26 | Verint Systems, Inc. | Systems and methods for endpoint recording using phones |
| US7826608B1 (en) | 2006-03-31 | 2010-11-02 | Verint Americas Inc. | Systems and methods for calculating workforce staffing statistics |
| US7852994B1 (en) | 2006-03-31 | 2010-12-14 | Verint Americas Inc. | Systems and methods for recording audio |
| US7995612B2 (en) * | 2006-03-31 | 2011-08-09 | Verint Americas, Inc. | Systems and methods for capturing communication signals [32-bit or 128-bit addresses] |
| US8130938B2 (en) * | 2006-03-31 | 2012-03-06 | Verint Americas, Inc. | Systems and methods for endpoint recording using recorders |
| US7672746B1 (en) | 2006-03-31 | 2010-03-02 | Verint Americas Inc. | Systems and methods for automatic scheduling of a workforce |
| US8000465B2 (en) * | 2006-03-31 | 2011-08-16 | Verint Americas, Inc. | Systems and methods for endpoint recording using gateways |
| US7792278B2 (en) | 2006-03-31 | 2010-09-07 | Verint Americas Inc. | Integration of contact center surveys |
| US8254262B1 (en) | 2006-03-31 | 2012-08-28 | Verint Americas, Inc. | Passive recording and load balancing |
| US7633930B2 (en) | 2006-03-31 | 2009-12-15 | Verint Americas Inc. | Systems and methods for capturing multimedia communication signals |
| US8442033B2 (en) | 2006-03-31 | 2013-05-14 | Verint Americas, Inc. | Distributed voice over internet protocol recording |
| US7701972B1 (en) | 2006-03-31 | 2010-04-20 | Verint Americas Inc. | Internet protocol analyzing |
| US7822018B2 (en) * | 2006-03-31 | 2010-10-26 | Verint Americas Inc. | Duplicate media stream |
| US20070237525A1 (en) * | 2006-03-31 | 2007-10-11 | Witness Systems, Inc. | Systems and methods for modular capturing various communication signals |
| US7680264B2 (en) * | 2006-03-31 | 2010-03-16 | Verint Americas Inc. | Systems and methods for endpoint recording using a conference bridge |
| US8155275B1 (en) | 2006-04-03 | 2012-04-10 | Verint Americas, Inc. | Systems and methods for managing alarms from recorders |
| US8331549B2 (en) | 2006-05-01 | 2012-12-11 | Verint Americas Inc. | System and method for integrated workforce and quality management |
| US8396732B1 (en) | 2006-05-08 | 2013-03-12 | Verint Americas Inc. | System and method for integrated workforce and analytics |
| US7817795B2 (en) * | 2006-05-10 | 2010-10-19 | Verint Americas, Inc. | Systems and methods for data synchronization in a customer center |
| US20070282807A1 (en) * | 2006-05-10 | 2007-12-06 | John Ringelman | Systems and methods for contact center analysis |
| US7660407B2 (en) | 2006-06-27 | 2010-02-09 | Verint Americas Inc. | Systems and methods for scheduling contact center agents |
| US20070297578A1 (en) * | 2006-06-27 | 2007-12-27 | Witness Systems, Inc. | Hybrid recording of communications |
| US7660406B2 (en) * | 2006-06-27 | 2010-02-09 | Verint Americas Inc. | Systems and methods for integrating outsourcers |
| US8644492B1 (en) * | 2006-06-28 | 2014-02-04 | West Corporation | Real time feedback of script logic |
| US9503578B1 (en) * | 2006-06-28 | 2016-11-22 | Alorica Business Solutions, Llc | Script logic viewing |
| US7903568B2 (en) * | 2006-06-29 | 2011-03-08 | Verint Americas Inc. | Systems and methods for providing recording as a network service |
| US7660307B2 (en) * | 2006-06-29 | 2010-02-09 | Verint Americas Inc. | Systems and methods for providing recording as a network service |
| US7848524B2 (en) | 2006-06-30 | 2010-12-07 | Verint Americas Inc. | Systems and methods for a secure recording environment |
| US7953621B2 (en) | 2006-06-30 | 2011-05-31 | Verint Americas Inc. | Systems and methods for displaying agent activity exceptions |
| US8131578B2 (en) * | 2006-06-30 | 2012-03-06 | Verint Americas Inc. | Systems and methods for automatic scheduling of a workforce |
| US20080004945A1 (en) * | 2006-06-30 | 2008-01-03 | Joe Watson | Automated scoring of interactions |
| US7853800B2 (en) | 2006-06-30 | 2010-12-14 | Verint Americas Inc. | Systems and methods for a secure recording environment |
| US7769176B2 (en) * | 2006-06-30 | 2010-08-03 | Verint Americas Inc. | Systems and methods for a secure recording environment |
| US7966397B2 (en) * | 2006-06-30 | 2011-06-21 | Verint Americas Inc. | Distributive data capture |
| US8934117B2 (en) | 2006-07-10 | 2015-01-13 | Synnex Corporation | Equipment management system |
| US7953750B1 (en) | 2006-09-28 | 2011-05-31 | Verint Americas, Inc. | Systems and methods for storing and searching data in a customer center environment |
| US7930314B2 (en) * | 2006-09-28 | 2011-04-19 | Verint Americas Inc. | Systems and methods for storing and searching data in a customer center environment |
| US7899176B1 (en) | 2006-09-29 | 2011-03-01 | Verint Americas Inc. | Systems and methods for discovering customer center information |
| US7881216B2 (en) * | 2006-09-29 | 2011-02-01 | Verint Systems Inc. | Systems and methods for analyzing communication sessions using fragments |
| US20080082387A1 (en) * | 2006-09-29 | 2008-04-03 | Swati Tewari | Systems and methods or partial shift swapping |
| US8199886B2 (en) * | 2006-09-29 | 2012-06-12 | Verint Americas, Inc. | Call control recording |
| US7752043B2 (en) | 2006-09-29 | 2010-07-06 | Verint Americas Inc. | Multi-pass speech analytics |
| US8005676B2 (en) * | 2006-09-29 | 2011-08-23 | Verint Americas, Inc. | Speech analysis using statistical learning |
| US7613290B2 (en) * | 2006-09-29 | 2009-11-03 | Verint Americas Inc. | Recording using proxy servers |
| US8645179B2 (en) * | 2006-09-29 | 2014-02-04 | Verint Americas Inc. | Systems and methods of partial shift swapping |
| US7570755B2 (en) * | 2006-09-29 | 2009-08-04 | Verint Americas Inc. | Routine communication sessions for recording |
| US7991613B2 (en) | 2006-09-29 | 2011-08-02 | Verint Americas Inc. | Analyzing audio components and generating text with integrated additional session information |
| US8837697B2 (en) * | 2006-09-29 | 2014-09-16 | Verint Americas Inc. | Call control presence and recording |
| US7885813B2 (en) * | 2006-09-29 | 2011-02-08 | Verint Systems Inc. | Systems and methods for analyzing communication sessions |
| US20080080685A1 (en) * | 2006-09-29 | 2008-04-03 | Witness Systems, Inc. | Systems and Methods for Recording in a Contact Center Environment |
| US7899178B2 (en) | 2006-09-29 | 2011-03-01 | Verint Americas Inc. | Recording invocation of communication sessions |
| US7920482B2 (en) | 2006-09-29 | 2011-04-05 | Verint Americas Inc. | Systems and methods for monitoring information corresponding to communication sessions |
| US8068602B1 (en) | 2006-09-29 | 2011-11-29 | Verint Americas, Inc. | Systems and methods for recording using virtual machines |
| US7965828B2 (en) | 2006-09-29 | 2011-06-21 | Verint Americas Inc. | Call control presence |
| US7873156B1 (en) | 2006-09-29 | 2011-01-18 | Verint Americas Inc. | Systems and methods for analyzing contact center interactions |
| US8280011B2 (en) * | 2006-12-08 | 2012-10-02 | Verint Americas, Inc. | Recording in a distributed environment |
| US8130925B2 (en) * | 2006-12-08 | 2012-03-06 | Verint Americas, Inc. | Systems and methods for recording |
| US8130926B2 (en) * | 2006-12-08 | 2012-03-06 | Verint Americas, Inc. | Systems and methods for recording data |
| US20080137814A1 (en) * | 2006-12-07 | 2008-06-12 | Jamie Richard Williams | Systems and Methods for Replaying Recorded Data |
| US20090003583A1 (en) * | 2007-01-12 | 2009-01-01 | Wellpoint, Inc. | Method for enhancing call center performance |
| US20080244686A1 (en) * | 2007-03-27 | 2008-10-02 | Witness Systems, Inc. | Systems and Methods for Enhancing Security of Files |
| US8743730B2 (en) * | 2007-03-30 | 2014-06-03 | Verint Americas Inc. | Systems and methods for recording resource association for a communications environment |
| US7869586B2 (en) | 2007-03-30 | 2011-01-11 | Eloyalty Corporation | Method and system for aggregating and analyzing data relating to a plurality of interactions between a customer and a contact center and generating business process analytics |
| US8023639B2 (en) | 2007-03-30 | 2011-09-20 | Mattersight Corporation | Method and system determining the complexity of a telephonic communication received by a contact center |
| US8170184B2 (en) | 2007-03-30 | 2012-05-01 | Verint Americas, Inc. | Systems and methods for recording resource association in a recording environment |
| US9106737B2 (en) * | 2007-03-30 | 2015-08-11 | Verint Americas, Inc. | Systems and methods for recording resource association for recording |
| US8718262B2 (en) | 2007-03-30 | 2014-05-06 | Mattersight Corporation | Method and system for automatically routing a telephonic communication base on analytic attributes associated with prior telephonic communication |
| US8437465B1 (en) | 2007-03-30 | 2013-05-07 | Verint Americas, Inc. | Systems and methods for capturing communications data |
| US8315901B2 (en) * | 2007-05-30 | 2012-11-20 | Verint Systems Inc. | Systems and methods of automatically scheduling a workforce |
| US20080300955A1 (en) * | 2007-05-30 | 2008-12-04 | Edward Hamilton | System and Method for Multi-Week Scheduling |
| US10419611B2 (en) | 2007-09-28 | 2019-09-17 | Mattersight Corporation | System and methods for determining trends in electronic communications |
| US8401155B1 (en) | 2008-05-23 | 2013-03-19 | Verint Americas, Inc. | Systems and methods for secure recording in a customer center environment |
| US8244567B2 (en) * | 2008-12-31 | 2012-08-14 | Synnex Corporation | Business goal incentives using gaming rewards |
| US8719016B1 (en) | 2009-04-07 | 2014-05-06 | Verint Americas Inc. | Speech analytics system and system and method for determining structured speech |
| IL199115A (en) * | 2009-06-03 | 2013-06-27 | Verint Systems Ltd | Systems and methods for efficient keyword spotting in communication traffic |
| US10115065B1 (en) | 2009-10-30 | 2018-10-30 | Verint Americas Inc. | Systems and methods for automatic scheduling of a workforce |
| US8768751B2 (en) * | 2012-04-25 | 2014-07-01 | Sap Ag | Enterprise gamification system for awarding employee performance |
| US8538006B1 (en) | 2012-04-30 | 2013-09-17 | Noble Systems Corporation | Systems, methods, and computer program products for providing interactive interfaces to call center agents |
| US8649499B1 (en) | 2012-11-16 | 2014-02-11 | Noble Systems Corporation | Communication analytics training management system for call center agents |
| US9191510B2 (en) | 2013-03-14 | 2015-11-17 | Mattersight Corporation | Methods and system for analyzing multichannel electronic communication data |
| US9106750B2 (en) * | 2013-08-20 | 2015-08-11 | Avaya Inc. | Facilitating a contact center agent to select a contact in a contact center queue |
| US20190087831A1 (en) * | 2017-09-15 | 2019-03-21 | Pearson Education, Inc. | Generating digital credentials based on sensor feedback data |
Family Cites Families (11)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US3525818A (en) * | 1967-07-11 | 1970-08-25 | Bell Telephone Labor Inc | Service observing system |
| US4006538A (en) * | 1973-04-27 | 1977-02-08 | Xerox Corporation | Educational device for learning switching |
| US4247895A (en) * | 1979-03-09 | 1981-01-27 | Weber Randy C | Dual mode arithmetic teaching apparatus |
| US4510351A (en) * | 1982-10-28 | 1985-04-09 | At&T Bell Laboratories | ACD Management information system |
| US4878176A (en) * | 1984-05-04 | 1989-10-31 | Asics Corporation | Production process control system |
| US4812126A (en) * | 1985-05-28 | 1989-03-14 | Byron Gilliksen | Education or learning aid method |
| US4671772A (en) * | 1985-10-22 | 1987-06-09 | Keilty, Goldsmith & Boone | Performance appraisal and training system and method of utilizing same |
| US4863384A (en) * | 1986-04-10 | 1989-09-05 | Keilty, Goldsmith & Boone | Personalized feedback system utilizing pre-recorded media and method of making same |
| US4694483A (en) * | 1986-06-02 | 1987-09-15 | Innings Telecom Inc. | Computerized system for routing incoming telephone calls to a plurality of agent positions |
| US5103408A (en) * | 1990-01-16 | 1992-04-07 | Atlantic Richfield Company | Apparatus and method for determining the ability of an individual to perform a task |
| US5068787A (en) * | 1990-03-13 | 1991-11-26 | Analysist Development Group, Inc. | Means and methods of tabulating time and task performances |
-
1991
- 1991-01-03 US US07/637,382 patent/US5239460A/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 1991-10-18 CA CA002053745A patent/CA2053745C/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
Also Published As
| Publication number | Publication date |
|---|---|
| CA2053745A1 (en) | 1992-07-04 |
| US5239460A (en) | 1993-08-24 |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| CA2053745C (en) | Arrangement for motivating telemarketing agents | |
| US4510351A (en) | ACD Management information system | |
| US6359982B1 (en) | Methods and apparatus for determining measures of agent-related occupancy in a call center | |
| US6614903B1 (en) | Methods and apparatus for service state-based processing of communications in a call center | |
| Koole et al. | Queueing models of call centers: An introduction | |
| CA2262044C (en) | Optimizing call-center performance by using predictive data to distribute agents among calls | |
| US6865267B2 (en) | Method and system for routing transactions in an automatic call distribution system based on non-voice dialog agent skill set | |
| US6704410B1 (en) | System for automatically assigning skill levels to multiple skilled agents in call center agent assignment applications | |
| US6744878B1 (en) | Real-time transaction routing augmented with forecast data and agent schedules | |
| US6163607A (en) | Optimizing call-center performance by using predictive data to distribute agents among calls | |
| US6754331B2 (en) | Determining statistics about the behavior of a call center at a past time instant | |
| US5715307A (en) | Integrated voice and business transaction reporting for telephone call centers | |
| DE69635152T2 (en) | Predict the motivation of a caller as the basis for the processing selection of an incoming call | |
| US5946388A (en) | Method and apparatus for priority queuing of telephone calls | |
| US5506898A (en) | Expected wait-time indication arrangement | |
| CA2109274C (en) | Arrangement for automating call-center agent-schedule-notification and schedule-adherence functions | |
| JP3366565B2 (en) | Apparatus and method for automatically assigning call center agents to skills in a call center | |
| US5832059A (en) | Call path system and method for modeling and modifying a call path of a telephone call routed by a telephone switch | |
| US20060203991A1 (en) | System for managing employee performance in a complex environment | |
| EP1039732A2 (en) | Improved skill-based call routing | |
| US20030215083A1 (en) | Customer service request allocations based upon real-time data and forecast data | |
| EP1826999A1 (en) | A user-defined priority call router | |
| US7616755B2 (en) | Efficiency report generator | |
| KR20050041485A (en) | Method for evaluating performance of consultants in call center system | |
| US6366665B1 (en) | Remote ACD data base modification via telephone |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| EEER | Examination request | ||
| MKLA | Lapsed |