CA2055446C - Perfluorodioxole membranes - Google Patents
Perfluorodioxole membranes Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CA2055446C CA2055446C CA002055446A CA2055446A CA2055446C CA 2055446 C CA2055446 C CA 2055446C CA 002055446 A CA002055446 A CA 002055446A CA 2055446 A CA2055446 A CA 2055446A CA 2055446 C CA2055446 C CA 2055446C
- Authority
- CA
- Canada
- Prior art keywords
- membrane
- dioxole
- perfluoro
- polymer
- dimethyl
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Expired - Lifetime
Links
- 239000012528 membrane Substances 0.000 title claims abstract description 212
- HFNSTEOEZJBXIF-UHFFFAOYSA-N 2,2,4,5-tetrafluoro-1,3-dioxole Chemical compound FC1=C(F)OC(F)(F)O1 HFNSTEOEZJBXIF-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 title description 5
- 239000007789 gas Substances 0.000 claims abstract description 92
- QVGXLLKOCUKJST-UHFFFAOYSA-N atomic oxygen Chemical compound [O] QVGXLLKOCUKJST-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims abstract description 55
- 239000001301 oxygen Substances 0.000 claims abstract description 55
- 229910052760 oxygen Inorganic materials 0.000 claims abstract description 55
- 229920000642 polymer Polymers 0.000 claims abstract description 53
- YSYRISKCBOPJRG-UHFFFAOYSA-N 4,5-difluoro-2,2-bis(trifluoromethyl)-1,3-dioxole Chemical compound FC1=C(F)OC(C(F)(F)F)(C(F)(F)F)O1 YSYRISKCBOPJRG-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims abstract description 47
- 150000002894 organic compounds Chemical class 0.000 claims abstract description 33
- 238000000926 separation method Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 29
- BFKJFAAPBSQJPD-UHFFFAOYSA-N tetrafluoroethene Chemical group FC(F)=C(F)F BFKJFAAPBSQJPD-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims abstract description 24
- 229920001577 copolymer Polymers 0.000 claims abstract description 21
- 230000009477 glass transition Effects 0.000 claims abstract description 21
- NBVXSUQYWXRMNV-UHFFFAOYSA-N fluoromethane Chemical compound FC NBVXSUQYWXRMNV-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims abstract description 15
- 229920006125 amorphous polymer Polymers 0.000 claims abstract description 12
- BLTXWCKMNMYXEA-UHFFFAOYSA-N 1,1,2-trifluoro-2-(trifluoromethoxy)ethene Chemical compound FC(F)=C(F)OC(F)(F)F BLTXWCKMNMYXEA-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims abstract description 9
- 230000000295 complement effect Effects 0.000 claims abstract description 9
- 239000008246 gaseous mixture Substances 0.000 claims abstract description 8
- BQCIDUSAKPWEOX-UHFFFAOYSA-N 1,1-Difluoroethene Chemical compound FC(F)=C BQCIDUSAKPWEOX-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims abstract description 6
- UUAGAQFQZIEFAH-UHFFFAOYSA-N chlorotrifluoroethylene Chemical group FC(F)=C(F)Cl UUAGAQFQZIEFAH-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims abstract description 5
- IJGRMHOSHXDMSA-UHFFFAOYSA-N Atomic nitrogen Chemical compound N#N IJGRMHOSHXDMSA-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 115
- 230000035699 permeability Effects 0.000 claims description 86
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 claims description 68
- 229910052757 nitrogen Inorganic materials 0.000 claims description 57
- 239000012466 permeate Substances 0.000 claims description 23
- VNWKTOKETHGBQD-UHFFFAOYSA-N methane Chemical compound C VNWKTOKETHGBQD-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 22
- 229920001519 homopolymer Polymers 0.000 claims description 16
- 229930195733 hydrocarbon Natural products 0.000 claims description 11
- 150000002430 hydrocarbons Chemical class 0.000 claims description 11
- 239000004215 Carbon black (E152) Substances 0.000 claims description 9
- 229910002092 carbon dioxide Inorganic materials 0.000 claims description 9
- CURLTUGMZLYLDI-UHFFFAOYSA-N Carbon dioxide Chemical compound O=C=O CURLTUGMZLYLDI-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 8
- 238000000576 coating method Methods 0.000 claims description 8
- 239000011248 coating agent Substances 0.000 claims description 7
- XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N water Substances O XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 7
- QGZKDVFQNNGYKY-UHFFFAOYSA-N Ammonia Chemical compound N QGZKDVFQNNGYKY-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 6
- 239000001257 hydrogen Substances 0.000 claims description 6
- 229910052739 hydrogen Inorganic materials 0.000 claims description 6
- 239000000178 monomer Substances 0.000 claims description 5
- 239000001569 carbon dioxide Substances 0.000 claims description 4
- 230000001747 exhibiting effect Effects 0.000 claims description 4
- 239000001307 helium Substances 0.000 claims description 4
- 229910052734 helium Inorganic materials 0.000 claims description 4
- SWQJXJOGLNCZEY-UHFFFAOYSA-N helium atom Chemical compound [He] SWQJXJOGLNCZEY-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 4
- 229910021529 ammonia Inorganic materials 0.000 claims description 3
- 239000000835 fiber Substances 0.000 claims description 3
- UGFAIRIUMAVXCW-UHFFFAOYSA-N Carbon monoxide Chemical compound [O+]#[C-] UGFAIRIUMAVXCW-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 2
- 229910002091 carbon monoxide Inorganic materials 0.000 claims description 2
- 125000004435 hydrogen atom Chemical class [H]* 0.000 claims 1
- 230000004907 flux Effects 0.000 abstract description 16
- 229920000620 organic polymer Polymers 0.000 abstract 1
- PXBRQCKWGAHEHS-UHFFFAOYSA-N dichlorodifluoromethane Chemical compound FC(F)(Cl)Cl PXBRQCKWGAHEHS-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 34
- 235000019404 dichlorodifluoromethane Nutrition 0.000 description 31
- 239000000203 mixture Substances 0.000 description 27
- YXFVVABEGXRONW-UHFFFAOYSA-N Toluene Chemical compound CC1=CC=CC=C1 YXFVVABEGXRONW-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 21
- 239000002904 solvent Substances 0.000 description 19
- 239000010408 film Substances 0.000 description 16
- 230000008569 process Effects 0.000 description 16
- 238000012360 testing method Methods 0.000 description 11
- OFBQJSOFQDEBGM-UHFFFAOYSA-N n-pentane Natural products CCCCC OFBQJSOFQDEBGM-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 10
- FYJQJMIEZVMYSD-UHFFFAOYSA-N perfluoro-2-butyltetrahydrofuran Chemical compound FC(F)(F)C(F)(F)C(F)(F)C(F)(F)C1(F)OC(F)(F)C(F)(F)C1(F)F FYJQJMIEZVMYSD-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 10
- 238000000807 solvent casting Methods 0.000 description 10
- -1 air Chemical compound 0.000 description 9
- 239000001273 butane Substances 0.000 description 8
- 239000000463 material Substances 0.000 description 8
- IJDNQMDRQITEOD-UHFFFAOYSA-N n-butane Chemical compound CCCC IJDNQMDRQITEOD-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 8
- 238000005259 measurement Methods 0.000 description 7
- 239000000155 melt Substances 0.000 description 7
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 description 6
- 238000003825 pressing Methods 0.000 description 6
- 238000012546 transfer Methods 0.000 description 6
- LVGUZGTVOIAKKC-UHFFFAOYSA-N 1,1,1,2-tetrafluoroethane Chemical compound FCC(F)(F)F LVGUZGTVOIAKKC-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 5
- UFHFLCQGNIYNRP-UHFFFAOYSA-N Hydrogen Chemical compound [H][H] UFHFLCQGNIYNRP-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 5
- 238000010438 heat treatment Methods 0.000 description 5
- 229920001343 polytetrafluoroethylene Polymers 0.000 description 5
- 239000004810 polytetrafluoroethylene Substances 0.000 description 5
- DDMOUSALMHHKOS-UHFFFAOYSA-N 1,2-dichloro-1,1,2,2-tetrafluoroethane Chemical compound FC(F)(Cl)C(F)(F)Cl DDMOUSALMHHKOS-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 4
- 239000007788 liquid Substances 0.000 description 4
- 238000001612 separation test Methods 0.000 description 4
- 229920002379 silicone rubber Polymers 0.000 description 4
- 239000004945 silicone rubber Substances 0.000 description 4
- ABADUMLIAZCWJD-UHFFFAOYSA-N 1,3-dioxole Chemical class C1OC=CO1 ABADUMLIAZCWJD-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 3
- OHMHBGPWCHTMQE-UHFFFAOYSA-N 2,2-dichloro-1,1,1-trifluoroethane Chemical compound FC(F)(F)C(Cl)Cl OHMHBGPWCHTMQE-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 3
- ZWEHNKRNPOVVGH-UHFFFAOYSA-N 2-Butanone Chemical compound CCC(C)=O ZWEHNKRNPOVVGH-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 3
- UHOVQNZJYSORNB-UHFFFAOYSA-N Benzene Chemical compound C1=CC=CC=C1 UHOVQNZJYSORNB-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 3
- 239000004338 Dichlorodifluoromethane Substances 0.000 description 3
- XAGFODPZIPBFFR-UHFFFAOYSA-N aluminium Chemical compound [Al] XAGFODPZIPBFFR-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 3
- 229910052782 aluminium Inorganic materials 0.000 description 3
- 238000005266 casting Methods 0.000 description 3
- 239000002131 composite material Substances 0.000 description 3
- 150000001875 compounds Chemical class 0.000 description 3
- 229940042935 dichlorodifluoromethane Drugs 0.000 description 3
- 238000004519 manufacturing process Methods 0.000 description 3
- VLKZOEOYAKHREP-UHFFFAOYSA-N n-Hexane Chemical compound CCCCCC VLKZOEOYAKHREP-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 3
- 238000011084 recovery Methods 0.000 description 3
- XKTYXVDYIKIYJP-UHFFFAOYSA-N 3h-dioxole Chemical compound C1OOC=C1 XKTYXVDYIKIYJP-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- WSSSPWUEQFSQQG-UHFFFAOYSA-N 4-methyl-1-pentene Chemical compound CC(C)CC=C WSSSPWUEQFSQQG-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- OTMSDBZUPAUEDD-UHFFFAOYSA-N Ethane Chemical compound CC OTMSDBZUPAUEDD-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 150000008280 chlorinated hydrocarbons Chemical class 0.000 description 2
- 238000010276 construction Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000001035 drying Methods 0.000 description 2
- 229920002313 fluoropolymer Polymers 0.000 description 2
- 239000004811 fluoropolymer Substances 0.000 description 2
- 239000011888 foil Substances 0.000 description 2
- 239000011521 glass Substances 0.000 description 2
- 229920002492 poly(sulfone) Polymers 0.000 description 2
- 229920000098 polyolefin Polymers 0.000 description 2
- 239000000047 product Substances 0.000 description 2
- 238000010926 purge Methods 0.000 description 2
- 229920006395 saturated elastomer Polymers 0.000 description 2
- 239000000344 soap Substances 0.000 description 2
- 238000011144 upstream manufacturing Methods 0.000 description 2
- 239000012855 volatile organic compound Substances 0.000 description 2
- 239000002699 waste material Substances 0.000 description 2
- BOSAWIQFTJIYIS-UHFFFAOYSA-N 1,1,1-trichloro-2,2,2-trifluoroethane Chemical compound FC(F)(F)C(Cl)(Cl)Cl BOSAWIQFTJIYIS-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- XLKWQAQYRNTVKF-UHFFFAOYSA-N 1,1,2,3,3,4,5-heptafluoro-5-(1,2,3,3,4,5,5-heptafluoropenta-1,4-dienoxy)penta-1,4-diene Chemical compound FC(F)=C(F)C(F)(F)C(F)=C(F)OC(F)=C(F)C(F)(F)C(F)=C(F)F XLKWQAQYRNTVKF-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- RFCAUADVODFSLZ-UHFFFAOYSA-N 1-Chloro-1,1,2,2,2-pentafluoroethane Chemical compound FC(F)(F)C(F)(F)Cl RFCAUADVODFSLZ-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- BHNZEZWIUMJCGF-UHFFFAOYSA-N 1-chloro-1,1-difluoroethane Chemical compound CC(F)(F)Cl BHNZEZWIUMJCGF-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- JIUOLPMEUGECKL-UHFFFAOYSA-N 4-methyl-2-methylidene-1,3-dioxolane Chemical compound CC1COC(=C)O1 JIUOLPMEUGECKL-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- BSFODEXXVBBYOC-UHFFFAOYSA-N 8-[4-(dimethylamino)butan-2-ylamino]quinolin-6-ol Chemical compound C1=CN=C2C(NC(CCN(C)C)C)=CC(O)=CC2=C1 BSFODEXXVBBYOC-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- XDTMQSROBMDMFD-UHFFFAOYSA-N Cyclohexane Chemical compound C1CCCCC1 XDTMQSROBMDMFD-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- RWSOTUBLDIXVET-UHFFFAOYSA-N Dihydrogen sulfide Chemical compound S RWSOTUBLDIXVET-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- PXGOKWXKJXAPGV-UHFFFAOYSA-N Fluorine Chemical compound FF PXGOKWXKJXAPGV-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- CTQNGGLPUBDAKN-UHFFFAOYSA-N O-Xylene Chemical compound CC1=CC=CC=C1C CTQNGGLPUBDAKN-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 239000001744 Sodium fumarate Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000004809 Teflon Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229920006362 Teflon® Polymers 0.000 description 1
- 230000009471 action Effects 0.000 description 1
- 150000001298 alcohols Chemical class 0.000 description 1
- 150000001338 aliphatic hydrocarbons Chemical class 0.000 description 1
- 150000004945 aromatic hydrocarbons Chemical class 0.000 description 1
- 230000005540 biological transmission Effects 0.000 description 1
- 229940026110 carbon dioxide / nitrogen Drugs 0.000 description 1
- 230000008859 change Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000003889 chemical engineering Methods 0.000 description 1
- 235000019406 chloropentafluoroethane Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- AFYPFACVUDMOHA-UHFFFAOYSA-N chlorotrifluoromethane Chemical compound FC(F)(F)Cl AFYPFACVUDMOHA-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 238000005253 cladding Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000002485 combustion reaction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000000052 comparative effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000012790 confirmation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000007547 defect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000018044 dehydration Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000006297 dehydration reaction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000001419 dependent effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000013461 design Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000011161 development Methods 0.000 description 1
- 229940087091 dichlorotetrafluoroethane Drugs 0.000 description 1
- 238000009792 diffusion process Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000006073 displacement reaction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000009189 diving Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000005108 dry cleaning Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000000428 dust Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229920001971 elastomer Polymers 0.000 description 1
- 150000002170 ethers Chemical class 0.000 description 1
- 238000002474 experimental method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000000194 fatty acid Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229910052731 fluorine Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 239000011737 fluorine Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000004817 gas chromatography Methods 0.000 description 1
- 210000002816 gill Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- JSRLCNHTWASAJT-UHFFFAOYSA-N helium;molecular nitrogen Chemical compound [He].N#N JSRLCNHTWASAJT-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 230000003993 interaction Effects 0.000 description 1
- 150000002500 ions Chemical class 0.000 description 1
- 239000003345 natural gas Substances 0.000 description 1
- JCXJVPUVTGWSNB-UHFFFAOYSA-N nitrogen dioxide Inorganic materials O=[N]=O JCXJVPUVTGWSNB-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- TVMXDCGIABBOFY-UHFFFAOYSA-N octane Chemical compound CCCCCCCC TVMXDCGIABBOFY-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 239000013307 optical fiber Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000004033 plastic Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229920003023 plastic Polymers 0.000 description 1
- 229920005597 polymer membrane Polymers 0.000 description 1
- 239000011148 porous material Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000000843 powder Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000001105 regulatory effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000012465 retentate Substances 0.000 description 1
- 125000006850 spacer group Chemical group 0.000 description 1
- 238000001228 spectrum Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000003860 storage Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000000758 substrate Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000010998 test method Methods 0.000 description 1
- TXEYQDLBPFQVAA-UHFFFAOYSA-N tetrafluoromethane Chemical compound FC(F)(F)F TXEYQDLBPFQVAA-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 239000010409 thin film Substances 0.000 description 1
- CYRMSUTZVYGINF-UHFFFAOYSA-N trichlorofluoromethane Chemical compound FC(Cl)(Cl)Cl CYRMSUTZVYGINF-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 229940029284 trichlorofluoromethane Drugs 0.000 description 1
- 239000008096 xylene Substances 0.000 description 1
Classifications
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B01—PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
- B01D—SEPARATION
- B01D71/00—Semi-permeable membranes for separation processes or apparatus characterised by the material; Manufacturing processes specially adapted therefor
- B01D71/06—Organic material
- B01D71/30—Polyalkenyl halides
- B01D71/32—Polyalkenyl halides containing fluorine atoms
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B01—PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
- B01D—SEPARATION
- B01D53/00—Separation of gases or vapours; Recovering vapours of volatile solvents from gases; Chemical or biological purification of waste gases, e.g. engine exhaust gases, smoke, fumes, flue gases, aerosols
- B01D53/22—Separation of gases or vapours; Recovering vapours of volatile solvents from gases; Chemical or biological purification of waste gases, e.g. engine exhaust gases, smoke, fumes, flue gases, aerosols by diffusion
- B01D53/228—Separation of gases or vapours; Recovering vapours of volatile solvents from gases; Chemical or biological purification of waste gases, e.g. engine exhaust gases, smoke, fumes, flue gases, aerosols by diffusion characterised by specific membranes
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B01—PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
- B01D—SEPARATION
- B01D71/00—Semi-permeable membranes for separation processes or apparatus characterised by the material; Manufacturing processes specially adapted therefor
- B01D71/06—Organic material
- B01D71/44—Polymers obtained by reactions only involving carbon-to-carbon unsaturated bonds, not provided for in a single one of groups B01D71/26-B01D71/42
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B01—PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
- B01D—SEPARATION
- B01D71/00—Semi-permeable membranes for separation processes or apparatus characterised by the material; Manufacturing processes specially adapted therefor
- B01D71/06—Organic material
- B01D71/76—Macromolecular material not specifically provided for in a single one of groups B01D71/08 - B01D71/74
Abstract
A selectively permeable membrane for the separation or enrichment of gaseous mixtures may be formed from amorphous polymers of perfluoro-2,2,-dimethyl-1,3-dioxole, esepcially copolymers with a complementary amount of at least one of tetrafluoroethylene, perfluoromethyl vinyl ether, vinylidene fluoride and chlorotrifluoroethylene. Preferably, the polymer is a dipolymer containing 65-99 mole % of perfluoro-2,2-dimethyl-1,3-dioxole and having a glass transition temperature of at least 140.degree.C. The membranes may be used for the separation or enrichment of a wide variety of gaseous mixtures, including oxygen enrichment of air, and separation ar enrichment of gaseous organic compounds in admixture with air, including separation or enrichment of the amount of fluorocarbon gases in air. The membranes exhibit a very high flux rate, compared with other glassy organic polymer membranes.
Description
_ 1 -PERFLUORODIOXOLE MEMBRANES
FIELD OF THE INVENTION
The present invention relates to selectively permeable membranes formed from a polymer, especially a dipolymer, of a perfluorodioxole. The membranes may be used in a variety of end-uses, two examples of which are oxygen enrichment of gaseous admixtures of oxygen and nitrogen e.g. air, and enrichment of the amount of gaseous organic compounds in admixtures with oxygen and/or nitrogen e.g. air. In embodiments, the gaseous, organic compound may be a gaseous fluorocarbon or a volatile organic compound.
BACKGROUND TO THE INVENTION
Methods for the enrichment and/or separation of gaseous organic compounds from gaseous admixtures, including gaseous admixtures with oxygen and/or nitrogen e.g. air, are known. For example, D.L. Roberts and G.D.
Ching discuss the recovery of fluorocarbon gases using silicone rubber membranes, specifically a silicone rubber on a polysulfone backing, in I&EC Process Design and Development, 1986, 25 971. It was found that the permeability of gaseous fluorocarbons varied substantially with the structure of the fluorocarbon, with some fluorocarbons exhibiting greater permeability through the membrane than nitrogen whereas other fluorocarbons exhibited lower permeability than nitrogen. For example, whereas carbon tetrafluoride exhibited a permeability through the silicone rubber membrane that was 15 times less than that of nitrogen, the permeability of dichlorodifluoromethane i.e. the fluorocarbon available commercially as Freon~ 12, was greater than that of nitrogen.
~~~ ~~y A process for the recovery and concentration of organic vapours from a stream of air containing no more than 20 000 ppm of the organic vapour is described in US
Patent 4 553 983 of R.W. Baker et al, which issued 1985 November 19. Such a process requires a selectivity for the organic vapour over air, as measured by nitrogen, of at least 50. The membrane that was exemplified was a silicone rubber membrane. Separation of organic vapours from air is also discussed by R.W. Baker et al in Journal of Membrane Science 31 (1987) 259-271.
Copolymers of perfluoro-2,2-dimethyl-1,3-dioxole, especially dipolymers with tetrafluoroethylene, are known for use as cladding materials in optical fibre constructions as well as certain electronics applications, and as moulded articles and films. Such dipolymers and uses thereof are described in US Patent 4 754 009 of E.N. Squire, which issued 1988 June 28, as well as in US Patent 4 530 569 of E.N. Squire, which issued 1985 July 23. Perfluorinated dioxole monomers and polymers are disclosed in US Patent 4 565 855 of B.C.
Anderson, D.C. England and P.R. Resnick, which issued 1986 January 21.
Films formed from polymers containing fluorine and having a ring structure in the main polymer chain are disclosed in published Japanese patent application No.
63 60 932 of Asahi Glass KK, published 1988 October 27.
The films have a thickness of less than 50 microns. Gas or liquid selectively permeable membranes.formed from fluoropolymers having a ring structure in the main polymer chain are disclosed in published Japanese patent application No. 63 264 101 of Asahi Glass KK, published 1988 November Ol. The membrane that is exemplified was formed from perfluoroallyl vinyl ether and had fluxes, in cm3.cm/cm2.sec.cm Hg (Barrers), as follows: He = 106;
H2 = 26; C02 = 8.2; 02 = 3.9: N2 = 0.87 and - 3 - 2~~~~~c CH4 = 0.24: a Barrer is 0.0365 m3.m/mZ.hr.bar.
The separation coefficients were calculated to be as follows: OZ/NZ = 4 . 4 ; COZ/CH4 = 35: He/CH4 = 452 ~ He/NZ =
12 2 and HZ/NZ = 3 0 .
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
A selectively permeable membrane that may be used in, for example, oxygen enrichment of gaseous admixtures containing oxygen and in the enrichment of gaseous organic compounds in admixture with oxygen and/or nitrogen e.g. air, has now been found. The membrane exhibits preferential permeability of oxygen at a high flux rate.
Accordingly, the present invention provides a selectively permeable membrane for the separation of gaseous mixtures, said membrane being formed from an amorphous polymer of perfluoro-2;2- dimethyl-1,3-dioxole and exhibiting an oxygen/nitrogen selectivity of at least 1.4.
In a still further embodiment, the membrane is a supported membrane, in the form of a film or coating on a porous support, or in the form of a hollow fibre.
The present invention further provides a membrane separation device containing a selectively permeable membrane formed from an amorphous polymer of perfluoro-2,2-dimethyl-1,3-dioxole.
In addition, the present invention provides a method for the enrichment of the amount of a gaseous organic compound in a gaseous admixture of said organic compound and at least one of oxygen and nitrogen, said method comprising:
(a) providing in a membrane separation cell a selectively permeable membrane having a feed side and a permeate side, said membrane having an oxygen/nitrogen selectivity of at least 1.4 and formed from an amorphous _4_ polymer of perfluoro-2,2- dimethyl--1,3-dioxole, and feeding said admixture to the feed side of said membrane, said membrane being at a temperatu~.~e of less than the glass transition temperature of the polymer;
(b) optionally applying a pressure differential across the membrane; and (c) removing from the feed side of the membrane, a gaseous admixture of said organic compound that is enriched in the amount of organic compound.
l0 In a preferred embodiment of the method of the present invention, the selective permeation of nitrogen over the organic compound is at least 10:1.
In a further embodiment, the organic compound is a gaseous fluorocarbon.
In another embodiment, the organic compound is a hydrocarbon.
Furthermore, the present invention provides a method for the enrichment of the amount of a gas in a gaseous admixture with another gas, especially oxygen in a gaseous admixture of oxygen and nitrogen, said method comprising:
(a) providing in a membrane separation cell a selectively permeable membrane having a feed side and a permeate side, said membrane having an oxygen/nitrogen selectivity of at least 1.4 and formed from an amorphous polymer of perfluoro-2,2- dimethyl-1,3-dioxole, and feeding said admixture to the feed side of said membrane, said membrane being at a temperature of less than the glass transition temperature of the polymer;
(b) optionally applying a pressure differential across the membrane; and (c) removing from the permeate. side of the membrane, a gaseous admixture that is enriched in the amount of one gas.
In a preferred embodiment of the method of the ?r r - 5 _ ~0~:~~ ~,~
present invention, the selective permeation of oxygen over nitrogen is at least 1.7:1.
In preferred embodiments of the membranes and methods of the present invention, the polymer is a copolymer of perfluoro-2,2-dimethyl-1,3-dioxole, especially a copolymer having a complementary amount of at least one monomer selected from the group consisting of tetrafluoroethylene, perfluoromethyl vinyl ether, vinylidene fluoride and chlorotrifluoroethylene.
In other embodiments, the polymer is a homopolymer of perfluoro-2,2-dimethyl-1,3-dioxole.
In further embodiment, the polymer is a dipolymer of perfluoro-2,2-dimethyl-1,3-dioxole and a complementary amount of tetrafluoroethylene, especially a dipolymer containing 65-99 mole % of perfluoro-2,2-dimethyl-1,3-dioxole and having a glass transition temperature of at least 140°C.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
The present invention is illustrated by the embodiment shown in the drawing in which:
Figure 1 is a schematic representation of a process for the separation of gaseous mixtures using a selectively permeable membrane.
DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
Apparatus for a membrane separation process is schematically illustrated in Figure 1. In that apparatus, shown generally by 1, membrane separation cell 2 has a feed or upstream section 3 and a permeate section 4 that are separated by selectively permeable membrane 5. Feed section 3 has connected thereto an inlet pipe 6 which, as shown, has an oven 7 for heating a gaseous mixture being fed to the apparatus, and inlet pump 8. In addition, inlet section 3 has connected thereto an outlet pipe 9. Permeate section 4 is connected to outlet transfer line 10 that in the embodiment shown has an 2~3~~~~~;
outlet pump 11.
Tn operation, a gaseous admixture is fed through inlet pipe 6 to feed section 3 of membrane separation cell 2. The gaseous admixture may be at ambient temperature but pressurized to above atmospheric pressure by inlet pump 8; however, the gaseous admixture may be heated by means of oven 7. After a period of time, a hold-up time which will depend primarily on the flow rate of the gaseous admixture and the volume of the feed l0 Section, the portion of the gaseous admixture that has not passed through the selectively permeable membrane 5 will pass from the feed section 3 by means of outlet pipe 9. Outlet pipe 9 may, in turn, be the inlet pipe of apparatus for further enrichment of the gaseous admixture or other process capable of using the gaseous admixture.
The gaseous material passing through the selectively permeable membrane passes from permeate section 4 through outlet transfer line 10 which as shown contains a pump 11t pump 11 will preferably be a pump capable of imparting a partial vacuum to the permeate section. Outlet transfer line 11 might be vented directly or indirectly to the atmosphere, or be the feed pipe for another process: as described herein, the gaseous admixture in outlet transfer line 10 will have substantially less of the gaseous organic compound than the inlet feed stream, and it might be environmentally acceptable to vent outlet transfer line 10 to the atmosphere.
As will be appreciated by persons skilled in the art, the feed section of the membrane cell may be pressurized i.e. be at a pressure above atmospheric pressure, and/or the permeate section may be partially evacuated i.e. be at a pressure below atmospheric pressure. In one preferred embodiment, the feed section is above atmospheric pressure and in another preferred 2~~~~~~
_ 7 _ embodiment, the permeate section is partially evacuated.
Alternatively, there may be no pressure differential per se, but rather a concentration differential with diffusion across the membrane.
The selectively permeable membrane is formed.
from an amorphous polymer of perfluoro-2,2-dimethyl-1,3-dioxole. In embodiments, the polymer is a homopolymer of perfluoro-2,2-dimethyl-1,3-dioxole. In other embodiments, the polymer is a copolymer of perfluoro-2,2-dimethyl-1,3-dioxole, including copolymers having a complementary amount of at least one monomer selected from the group consisting of tetrafluoroethylene, perfluoromethyl vinyl ether, vinylidene fluoride and chlorotrifluaroethylene. In preferred embodiments, the polymer is a dipolymer of perfluoro-2,2-dimethyl-1,3-dioxole and a complementary amount of tetrafluoroethylene, especially such a polymer containing 65-99 mole % of perfluoro-2,2-dimethyl-1,3-dioxole. The amorphous polymer preferably has a glass transition temperature of at least 140°C, and more preferably at least 180°C. Glass transition temperature (Tg) is known in the art and is the temperature at which the polymer changes from a brittle, vitreous or glassy state to a rubbery or plastic state.
Examples of dipolymers axe described in further detail in the aformentioned U.S. Patent 4 754 009 of E.N. Squire.
The glass transition temperature of the amorphous polymer will vary with the actual polymer of the membrane, especially the amount of tetrafluoroethylene or other comonomer that may be present. Examples of Tg are shown in Figure 1 of the aforementioned US Patent 4 754 009 of E.N. Squire as ranging from about 260°G for dipolymers with tetrafluoroethylene having low amounts of tetrafluoroethylene comonomer down to less than 100°C for ~~~~e~~~
_8_ the dipolymers containing at least 60 mole % of tetrafluoroethylene.
Useful membrane configurations include, but are not limited to, thin film composite films and composite hollow fibres, especially in which a thin layer or coating of the amorphous polymer is supported by a porous substrate of another polymer, and monolithic film and fibre membranes. The membranes must be thin, in order to maximize the rate of gas transmission through the membrane, preferably less than 0.01 mm and especially less than 0.001 mm in thickness; in the case of composite membranes, such thickness refers to the thickness of the layer or coating of the amorphous polymer.
The membranes of the present invention may be~
manufactured by a variety of methods known to those :skilled in the art, particularly in the light of the versatile processability of the perfluorodioxole polymers. These methods include solvent and melt film-casting and fibre-casting methods, as well as coating techniques; other fluoropolymers tend to be either melt processible but not solvent processible or not processible by either method.
The gaseous admixture fed to the membrane separation cell may be an admixture of oxygen, usually containing nitrogen and especially in the form of air, and optionally containing a gaseous organic compound.
The gaseous organic compound may be a compound that is a gas at atmospheric temperature and pressure, but will more commonly be the vapour of an organic compound that is in liquid form at atmospheric pressure and temperature. The gaseous admixture will usually be at about ambient temperature but may be at higher temperatures; the membranes used in the method of the present invention are capable of being used at elevated temperature, including in some embodiments at 2~~~~~~
_ g _ temperatures above 100°C. However, the membranes should be used at a temperature below the glass transition temperature, and especially at least 30°C below the glass transition temperature, of the amorphous polymer used to form the membrane. In preferred embodiments, the glass transition temperature is at least 140°C and especially at least 180°C. The method of the present invention may be operated at relatively low temperatures e.g. as low as about 10°C, and especially about 15°C.
The gas admixture may originate from a wide variety of sources. For example, the gaseous admixture may be air, or an admixture derived from air e.g. an admixture that has been enriched in oxygen using for example the method of the present invention.
In alternative embodiments, the gaseous admixture may be an admixture of, for example, air containing an organic compound. In one embodiment, the admixture may be from a process for the manufacture of foamed materials, in which event the organic compound may be a fluorocarbon or hydrocarbon of the type used in such processes. Alternatively, the admixture may be from a dry cleaning process in which event the organic compound may be a hydrocarbon or chlorinated hydrocarbon, or from a coating process in which event the organic compound may be mixtures of aromatic and aliphatic hydrocarbons and derivatives thereof e.g. ethers, alcohols and the like.
The admixture may be vapours from storage vessels or a wide variety of processes that utilize liquid or gaseous organic compounds in steps in the process. The gaseous admixtures may contain a wide range of amounts of organic compounds, but would normally contain an amount that cannot be discharged to the atmosphere because of regulatory or other reasons; such amounts might be as low as 0.01% by weight or substantially higher. Moreover, the gaseous admixture may be an admixture that has been _ g _ '~ M n ~ ~ 1 f ~'~
.,t 1 '.3 subjected to an enrichment process according to the procedures described herein or by another method.
It will be appreciated that a wide range of organic compounds may be subjected to the method of the present invention. Examples of such compounds include fluorocarbons e.g. trichloromonofluoromethane, dichlorodifluoromethane, monochlorotrifluoromethane, trichlorotrifluoroethane, dichlorotetrafluoroethane, monochloropentafluoroethane, CF3CH2F, hydrocarbons e.g. butane, pentane, hexane, octane, cyclohexane, benzene, toluene, xylene, naphtha and other mixed hydrocarbon fractions, chlorinated hydrocarbon solvents, polar organic compounds e.g. methyl ethyl ketone, and the like.
As exemplified hereinafter, oxygen and nitrogen tend to preferentially pass through the selectively permeable membranes, with oxygen being passed in preference to nitrogen, and does so at high flux. This combination of selectivity and high flux is generally in cantrast to other membranes, and provides a method for the enrichment of a gaseous admixture e.g. air, with respect to the amount of oxygen relative to the amount of nitrogen in the admixture in a manner that is believed to be of significant practical importance, and the enrichment occurs on the permeate side of the membrane.
This provides a method for the enrichment of one or more gases in a gaseous admixture relative to other gases in the admixture.
In embodiments in which the gaseous admixture contains an organic compound, oxygen and nitrogen are preferentially passed through the membrane, especially at relatively low concentrations of the organic compound.
Thus, the feed stream is enriched in the organic compound. This tends to be in contrast to processes known in the art e.g. the process as described in U.S.
~~. L;! s Patent 4 553 983. Moreover, oxygen and nitrogen pass through the membrane at a high rate: i.e. there is high flux rate, which is necessary in order that use of the membrane according to the present method be of commercial interest.
The membranes of the present invention exhibit a selectivity of axygen over nitrogen of at least 1.4:1, and preferably at least 1.7:1. In addition, the membranes preferably exhibit a flux for oxygen of at least 100 Barrens, especially at least 20o Barrens and in particular at least 500 Barrens. For practical applications of the membranes of the invention, the membranes need to be virtually free of defects, as will be appreciated by those skilled in the art: such a requirement is understood to be embodied in the oxygen/nitrogen selectivity of at least 1.4:1.
As discussed above, the membrane may be used for the oxygen enrichment of a gaseous admixture i.e. to provide gaseous streams having a relatively high content of oxygen. Alternatively, the membranes may be used to enrich a gaseous admixture containing organic compounds with respect to the amount of organic compounds in the admixture, one example of which is separation of gaseous fluorocarbons from a process having a waste stream containing gaseous fluorocarbons, prior to discharge of the waste stream to the environment. Another example is the separation of volatile organic compounds e.g.
hydrocarbons, from a stream containing such compounds.
In addition, the membranes may be used to separate or enrich other gaseous mixtures, examples of which include, but are not limited to, oxygen/carbon dioxide, hydrogen/methane, hydrogen/nitrogen, carbon dioxide/methane, helium/methane, helium/nitrogen, hydrogen/carbon monoxide, ammonia/nitrogen and carbon dioxide/nitrogen. Applications include oxygen enrichment, refinery hydrocarbon recovery, ammonia purge gas treatment, natural gas dehydration, sour gas treating, helium separations, pollution control, underwater gills for diving and air treatment in, for example, shopping malls. Examples of uses of gas separation membranes are given in "Economics of Gas Separation Membranes" by R.W. Spillman, Chemical Engineering Progress January 1989, pages 41-62, .
The perfluorodioxoles membranes described herein are expected to be outstanding membrane materials for membrane-based gas separations requiring high gas permeability. There are two key criteria in the selection of membrane materials for practical membrane-based gas separation viz. product flow rate and product purity. Thus, a useful membrane material should exhibit a high permeability towards one or more components and a low permeability towards the other components of the feed mixture, which is sometimes expressed as a high fast-gas permeability or flux and high selectivity, the latter being defined as the ratio of the permeability of the fast (higher permeability) and slow (lower permeability) gases. These two praperties of high permeability and high selectivity are seldom found together. High permeability dipolymers generally exhibit low selectivity and high selectivity dipolymers generally exhibit low permeation or flux rates.
While many practical membrane constructions seek a balance between flux and selectivity, others rely on one or the other to achieve gas separations. For example, a high selectivity membrane dipolymer is needed for the production of 97-99% nitrogen from air in an inexpensive manner, even if the permeability is mediocre and a high membrane area is required. Conversely, a highly permeable material may be preferred for a lightweight membrane unit for the production of 23-35%, ~~~~~~r:~,' especially 23-27~, oxygen-enriched air for enhanced combustion. The examples hereinafter show that membranes of the invention are of the latter type, exhibiting exceptionally high gas permeabilities and relatively low selectivity toward most combinations of gases. The permeabilities tend to be relatively very high compared to other glassy polymers, and of the order of one to two orders of magnitude greater than known commercially available glassy polymer membrane materials. The membranes of the invention are believed to be of particular interest for applications demanding ultrahigh gas permeability.
In Examples I-IV hereinafter, gas permeation properties of the perfluorodioxole dipolymers were measured using samples of dense film membranes. The samples were cut into discs and mounted in a permeation cell, so as to form a feed gas chamber and a permeate gas chamber, the latter being operated at lower pressure.
In the air separation tests, the feed stream was °ompressed air, which was provided at a flow rate that was high enough to ensure a constant feed-stream composition: the permeate oxygen-enriched air was removed at atmospheric pressure. Permeate flow rate was measured by the volumetric displacement of a soap bubble in a Calibrated burette, and permeate composition was determined by gas chromatography. In most of the single-gas permeation tests, the feed gas was provided at a pressure ranging from 21 kPa to 3500 kPa.
In some low pressure tests, the permeate gas flow rate was determined by measuring the rate of increase in pressure in a constant volume evacuated chamber. The permeability of the dipolymers for the gas was determined from the volume of the evacuated chamber and the thickness and surface area of the membrane.
The present invention is illustrated by the 14 _ following examples.
EX~1HIPLE I
Membranes having a thickness of 0.25 mm were melt pressed from a dipolymer of perfluoro-2,2-dimethyl-1,3-dioxole and tetrafluoroethylene having a glass transition temperature of 253°C.
In single-gas and mixed gas permeation tests, using the permeation test method described above, the films exhibited exceptionally high permeability toward the components of air viz. 990 Barrens with respect to oxygen and 490 Barrens with respect to nitrogen; a Barren is defined by the following formula:
Barren = 10-10 [cm3(STP).cm]/[cm2.sec.cmHg]
Furthermore, it was found that the oxygen and nitrogen permeabilities were not functions of the feed pressures, nor of the membrane thickness.
single-gas permeability of dichlorodifluoro-methane (CFC-12) vapour through the films was also measured using both constant pressure and the constant volume techniques. In this instance, it was found that the permeability of CFC-12 was a strong function of the pressure applied. The results obtained are summarized in Table I.
TABhE I
CFC-12 Pressure CFC-12 Permeability 124 kPa 14 Barren 207 kPa 75 Barren 469 kPa 250 Barren Thus, it was found that lowering the partial , pressure of the CFC-12 resulted in a decrease in the permeability of the CFC-12 through the film, thus indicating that the partial pressure of the fluorocarbon was having an effect on the properties of the membrane that affected permeability.
rrhe results obtained show that a membrane of the dipolymer of this Example when used with a mixture of CFC-12 and air i.e. a CFC-12-in-air stream, would preferentially pass the components of air to the permeate stream (in the permeate section of the cell) and enrich the retentate stream (in the upstream or feed section of the cell) with the less permeable CFC-12 vapor. If the feed CFC-12/air mixture has a low CFC-12 concentration (and thus low CFC-12 partial pressure), the CFC
permeability would be expected to be low and the selectivity of N2/CFC-12 to be high.
EXAMPLE II
Membranes were prepared from a dipolymer of perfluoro-2,2-dimethyl-1,3-dioxole and tetrafluoro-ethylene having a glass transition temperature of 166°C
using melt pressing and solvent casting techniques. The melt pressed films had a thickness of 0.25 mm and the solvent cast films had a thickness of 0.025 mm.
The solvent cast films were formed from solution (15~ by weight of the dipolymer in FC-75: FC-75 is the tradename of a commercial solvent available from 3M
Company, and is perfluoro (2-butyl tetrahydrofuran)).
Membranes having a thickness of 0.38 mm were cast from the solution onto a glass plate and the solvent was allowed to evaporate slowly: the dry membrane of the dipolymer that was obtained had a thickness of 0.025 mm.
The films were subjected to single-gas permeation tests using the procedure described above, using air, nitrogen, CFC-12 and CF3CH2F, the latter being one of the hydrogen-containing fluorocarbons being developed as replacements for chlorofluorocarbons and referred to as HFC-134A. The results obtained are summarized in Table II.
Permeation results are summarized in Table II.
TABLE II
Gas Membrane Thickness Feed Pressure Permeability 02 0.250 mm 3.55 MPa air 350 Barrer 02 0.025 mm 0.79 MPa air 340 Barrer N2 0.250 mm 3.55 MPa air 130 Barrer N2 0.025 mm 0.79 MPa air 130 Barrer CFC-12 0.025 mm 0.17 MPa 45 Barrer HFC-134A 0.025 mm 0.17 MPa 20 Barrer The results show that, for oxygen and nitrogen, membrane thickness had no apparent effect on the permeability results obtained.
The results also indicate that the dipolymer of this Example exhibits lower permeability than the dipolymer in Example I: the latter had a higher content of perfluoro-2,2-dimethyl-1,3-dioxole. However, ' permeability towards the components of air is still exceptionally high, being at least two orders of magnitude higher than polytetrafluoroethylene.
EXAMPLE III
Membranes with a thickness of 0.25 mm were melt-pressed from three dipolymers of perfluoro-2,2-dimethyl-1,3-dioxole and tetrafluoroethylene of different dioxole contents and glass transition temperatures (Tg).
The results of air separation tests using air with a feed stream pressure of 700-3550 kPa are given in Table III.
TABLE III
Dioxole Tg Permeability Selectivity (mole %) 02 02/N2 66 166°C 340 Barrer 2.6 76 203°C 380 Barrer 2.3 86 253°C 990 Barrer 2.05 In the air-separation tests, these dipolymer membranes exhibited exceptionally high 02 and N2 permeabilities. The membrane prepared from the lowest Tg-grade dipolymer had the highest 02/N2 selectivity, whereas the membrane prepared from the highest Tg-grade dipolymer had the highest 02 permeability and lowest 02jN2 selectivity. In comparison, commercial air separation membranes formed from glassy polymers tend to be more selective but with substantially lower flux towards oxygen, with O~ permeability typically ranging from about 1.3 Barrer (polysulfone) to 30 Barrer (poly 4-methylpentene); a very small proportion of known membranes or films exhibit permeabilities in excess of 100 Barrers for oxygen. The results of Table III also show that membranes of the invention may be prepared with a range of permeation properties.
EXAMPLE IV
Single-gas permeation tests were conducted using a membrane prepared from a membrane of the high-Tg dipolymer described in Example III. A number of different gases were tested. As a comparison, tests were also conducted on a membrane formed from polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE).
A number of permeability measurements were conducted, using pressures that were generally in the range of 350-1750 kPa, it being the understanding that the permeability of the gases listed in Table IV is only a slight function of pressure in this pressure range. An exception to this understanding may be carbon dioxide, and the pressure used for this gas was 1750 kPa.
The results obtained are given in Table IV.
,... ,' r, TABLE IV
Gas Permeability Dipolymer PTFE
C02 2800 Barren 12 Barren He 2700 Barren H2 2200 Barren 9.8 Barren 02 990 Barren 4.2 Barren Nz 490 Barren 1.4 Barren Ethylene 350 Barren Methane 340 Barren Ethane 180 Barren l0 The results obtained illustrate the high permeability obtainable with the membranes of the present invention. Whereas the selectivity demonstrated by the dipolymer and polytetrafluoroethylene membranes are similar, and believed to be relatively typical of glassy, non-rubbery polymers, the dipolymer membranes exhibit relatively very high permeability. It is apparent that the membranes of the invention have potential in many membrane-based gas separations including, but not limited to, H2/CH4, H2/N2, C02/CH4, He/CH4, He/N2, C02/02 and C02/N2.
EXAMPLE V
Permeation measurements were conducted using a permeation cell that was immersed in water in a temperature-controlled water bath. The permeate from the permeation cell was passed through a sampler bulb of a gas chromatograph, to measure the composition of the permeate, and then to a soap film capillary to measure the permeate flow rate. Concentrations in gas mixtures were measured with a HP Gas Chromatograph model 5700A
3o followed by a Spectra Physics Integrator type model SP4400. Pressure and pressure drop could be measured in the cell.
The membrane was placed on a porosive sinter (pore size 15 - 20 microns) and held in place using two ,, ~ :z (;
Teflon~ rings. The effective membrane area for mass transfer was 9.62 cm2 (3.5 cm diameter).
When mixtures of gases were being tested, a purging stream with about l0 times the permeate flow rate was used to ensure a constant feed concentration, and the purged stream was monitored to determine the feed concentration. For measurements with single gases, the cell was purged at the beginning of each experiment for a short period of time.
Melt pressed membranes were prepared by placing polymer in a mould and heating to a temperature of about 20°C above the glass transition temperature (Tg). When that temperature was reached, the polymer was treated by applying pressure and releasing it, using pressures of. up to 50 tonnes/12.5 cm diameter of the membrane, for 5 minutes. The mould was then slowly cooled under a pressure of 40 tonnes/12.5 cm diameter, to room temperature. The resultant thick powder was transferred to the center of a flat plate covered by aluminum foil.
Another aluminum foil-covered flat plate was mounted on it, without any spacer. The two plates were heated in a melt press, at minimal pressure, to a temperature of 100°C above Tg, after which the pressure was raised to 40 tonnej12.5 cm diameter, and the sample was pressed for 10 minutes. The sample was then cooled slowly to room temperature under pressure, and the aluminum foil was peeled off carefully.
Cast membranes were prepared from solutions of the polymers in FC-75 solvent. The solution was warmed to 50-60°C, and filtered through a 3 micron filter. The filtered solution was cast onto clean glass, and dried at ambient temperature in a dust free environment. The membrane was further dried in an oven at 80°C for at least 2 hours, and than in an oven at 110°C overnight.
Membranes were formed from a dipolymer of p" w ,° n m perfluoro-2,2-dimethyl°1,3-dioxole and tetrafluoroethylene having a glass transition temperature of 240°C, by solvent casting from a 2.5% solution in FC-75 solvent using the procedure described above, with the heating at 110°C being for 12 hours. The resultant membrane was 20 micron thick.
The mixed gas fed to the permeation cell had the following composition: N2 78.25%, 02 20.67% and CFC-Z2 1.0%.
Further experimental details and the results obtained are given in Table V. Measurements were made at 20°C under steady-state conditions in this and the following examples, unless stated to the contrary.
TABLE V
pressure Permeability Selectivity (kpa) (Barrers) 700 242 114 16 2.1 7.1 445 263 112 11 2.4 10.3 The results show that the selectivity to the fluorocarbon gas is dependent on the pressure used in the process, improving at lower pressures.
EXAMPLE VI
A membrane was made by melt pressing the polymer of Example III. The membrane was 80 micron thick and was prepared by heating to 340°C under a total pressure of 20 tonnes total ram force. The gas used was the same mixture as used in Example V.
Further details and the results obtained are given in Table VI.
r r a 2~~~r~~~~~7 TABLE VI
Pressure Permeability Selectivity (kPa) (Barrers) 790 592 299 40 2.0 7.5 The selectivity obtained was similar to that obtained in Example V, but the permeability was significantly higher.
EXAMPLE VII
The permeability of nitrogen and CFC-12 as single gases was measured using the membrane of Example V.
Further details and the results obtained are given in Table VII.
TABLE VII
Gas Pressure Permeability Selectivity (kPa) (Barrers) N2/CFC-12 This example, together with Example VI, illustrates the plasticizing action of fluorocarbon gases on the membranes of the invention.
EXAMPLE VIII
Membranes were formed from a dipolymer of perfluoro-2,2-dimethyl-1,3-dioxole and tetrafluoroethylene having a glass transition temperature of 160°C, by solvent casting from a 4.0% solution in FC-75 solvent, using the procedure of Example V, the membrane being heated at 110°C for 12 hours. The resultant membrane was 10 micron thick.
The mixed gas fed to the permeation cell had the following composition: N2 78.25%, 02 20.67% and CFC-12 1.0%.
__ t~. ;"' is ~ ,-.J -..l Further experimental detail~~ and the results obtained are given in Table VIII.
TABLE VIII
Pressure Permeability .Selectivity (kPa) (Barrers) Oz NZ CFC-12 Oz/NZ Nz/CFC-12 790 372 1.56 13 2.4 11.8 445 403 166 12 2.4 1.4.2 The results illustrate use of a membrane of the invention with mixed gases.
EXAMPLE IX
Membranes were prepared from a number of different polymers of perfluoro-2,2-dimethyl 1,3-dioxole, using the solvent casting method described in Example VII. The membranes were tested for permeability using the gaseous mixture of Example VII.
Further details and the results obtained are given in Table IX.
TABLE IX
Polymer* Pressure Permeability Selectivity (kPa) (Barrers) NZ CFC-12 OZ/NZ N~/CFC-12 A 790 444 332 203 1.3 1.6 445 463 306 63 1.5 4.8 B 790 586 444 362 1.3 1.2 445 505 436 317 1.3 1.4 C 790 2097 1143 312 1.8 3.7 445 2228 1165 211 1.8 5.5 240 2200 1166 160 1.9 7.3 * A = Copolymer of perfluoro methyl vinyl ether and perfluoro-2,2-dimethyl-1,3-dioxole, with a T9 of 139°C; membrane thickness was 15 microns.
B = Copolymer of chlorotrifluoroethylene and perfluoro-2,2-dimethyl-1,3-dioxole, with a T9 of 157°C; membrane thickness was 13 microns.
C = Homopolymer of perfluoro-2,2-dimethyl 1,3-dioxole, with a T of 330°C; membrane thickness was 17 micr~ns.
The results show that the homopolymer exhibits high permeation rates. The homopolymer and copolymer with perfluoromethyl vinyl ether exhibit significant selectivity of nitrogen over the fluorocarbon gas.
EXAMPLE X
A copalymer of perfluoro(methyl vinyl ether) and perfluoro-2,2-dimethyl 1,3-dioxole having a Tg of 139°C
was solvent cast into membranes from a 10% solution of the polymer in FC-75 solvent and dried as described in Example VII. A second membrane was prepared in the same manner, except that the membrane was heated to a temperature above the Tg, to a temperature of 150°C for an additional hour. Both membranes were tested with single gases.
The results obtained are given in Table X.
TABLE X
Membrane Temp. of Permeability Selectivity Thickness Drying Barrers (microns) N2/CFC-12 N2/CFC-12 55 Below Tg 47/12 3.9 63 Above Tg 63/18 3.8 The results show that, for the polymer from which the membrane was formed, heating the membrane above the glass transition point gave an apparent modest increase in the permeability of the membrane but did Y~ot affect the selectivity of the membrane under the conditions used.
EXAMPLE XI
Membranes formed from poly-[perfluoro(2-methylene-4-methyl-1,3-dioxolane)] i.e. polymer of the aforementioned U.S. 3 308 107, had been tested for w permeability using a volumetric method at 25°C.
Further experimental details and the results obtained are given in Table XI.
TABLE XI
Gas Permeability Gas Permeability He 650 Barrers Hz 240 Barrers COZ* 67 Barrers CO 8 Barrers CH4* 2 Barrers Ox* 3 6 Barrers Nz* 10 Barrers __ * Results are averages of data for single gases and binary mixtures.
The results show that the polymer of US
3 308 107 exhibit permeabilities to gases that were 2.5 to 40 times lower than those measured as described above in examples herein. A comparison with the data for the homopolymer in Table IX shows that the data obtained from the membrane of this invention is 60-110 times more permeable. Selectivities were, however, higher with the membrane of US 3 308 107. It is believed that the permeability data for methane may be in error, being smaller than would be expected.
EXAMPLE XII
Permeability measurements were conducted on a variety of membranes, formed by melt pressing or by solvent casting. The method of measurement of permeability was that described in Example V. The gases used were nitrogen and CFC-12, the permeabilities for which were measured separately.
Further experimental details and the results obtained are given in Table XII.
~.rtt~L~ xm Polymer* Permeability SelE:Ctivity (Barrers) NZ CFC-12 (Nz/CFC-12) F 2725 1168 2~3 G 63 18 3.5'.
H 53 2.5 21 49 53 0.92 * E = Copolymer of per.fluoro-2,2-dimethyl - -1,3-dioxole and tetrafluoroethylene, T9 =
240°C, thickness = 80 microns, formed by melt pressing, pressure used was 143 kPa;
F = Homopolymer of perfluoro-2,2-dimethyl -1,3-dioxole, T9 = 330°C, thickness = 24 microns, formed by solvent casting from FC-75 solvent, pressure used. was 136 kPa;
G = Copolymer of perfluoro-2,2-dimethyl -1,3-dioxole and perfluoromethyl vinyl ether, T9 = 137°C, thickness = 63 microns, formed by solvent casting from FC-75 solvent, pressure used was 136 kPa;
H = Copolymer of vinylidene fluoride and perfluoro-2,2-dimethyl-1,3-dioxole, with a T9 of 82'C: thickness = 55 microns, formed by solvent casting from FC-75 solvent, pressure used was 274 kPa prig. Note:~at a lower pressure, no flux of CFC-12 was observed;
J = Copolymer of perfluoro-2,2-dimethyl -1,3-dioxole and tetrafluoroethylene, T =
160°C, thickness = 200 microns, formed ~by melt pressing, pressure used was 136 kPa.
The results show effects of comonomer on permeability and selectivity to nitrogen and CFC-12.
EXAMPLE XIII
Using procedures described above, membranes were melt pressed from a copolymer of perfluoro-2,2-dimethyl -1,3-dioxole and tetrafluoroethylene having a T9 = 240'C. Permeation tests were conducted using mixtures of oxygen, nitrogen and a fluorocarbon gas or of nitrogen and a hydrocarbon gas.
Further experimental details and the results obtained are given in Table XIII.
TABhE XIII
Gas Permeability Selectivity Flux Mixture (Barrers) (ml/sec) (a) Membrane thickness 200 microns A 505 1005 41 12.5 2.0 0.0152 B 255 480 4 61 1.9 0.0082 C 535 1065 <3 >100 2.0 0.0156 D 555 1080 37 15 1.9 0.0161 E 570 1130 71 8 2.0 0.0167 F 405 - 55 7.4 - 0.0100 (b) Membrane ickness 80 microns th A 300 590 40 7.5 2.0 0.0217 B 215 450 15 14 2.1 0.0161 C 290 565 9 31 1.9 0.0208 D 350 640 28 12.5 1.8 0.0250 E 365 700 49 7.5 1.9 0.0263 F 385 - 130 3 - 0.0238 Note: The membranes shown in the Table were prepared from the same polymer but in different laboratories Gas mixture CFC 12 (MW = 120.9): air in ratio of A = 1:99 Gas mixture HCFC 123 (MW = 152.9):air in ratio of B =
0.43:99.57 Gas mixture CFC 114(MW = 170.9): air in a ratio C = of 1:99 Gas mixture HCFC 142b (MW = 100.5):air in a ratio D = of 1:99 Gas mixture HCFC 134a (MW = 102.0): air in ratio E = of 1:99 Gas mixture butane (MW = 58.1):nitrogen in a ratio F = of 1:99 The results show a correlation of increasing selectivity with increasing molecular weight of the fluorocarbon gas or hydrocarbon gas. In one of the membranes, two highest molecular weight gases had the selectivities of above 100 and 60 respectively.
On the basis of the above results, it would appear that selectivity related to molecular size, rather than is whether the gas is a fluorocarbon or a hydrocarbon.
Example XIV
A 1:1 mixture of homopolymer of perfluoro-2,2--dimethyl-i,3-dioxole and the copol.yroer of perflt:or'c~-~~i2T3.;~ ~' dimethyl-1,3-dioxo:le and tetrafluoroe thylene having a 'r9 of 240°C was solvent cast from FC:-75 solvent to give a membrane having a thickness of 95 microns after drying overnight at 110°C. Permeability me~sure.ments were conducted on the membrane using the HCFC 123/air mixture of Example XIII.
The Oz/NZ selectivity obtained was 2.1 at 790 kPa, while the Nz/HCFC 123 selectivity was 4.3. The Oz and.-Nz permeabilities were 669 and 317 Barrers, respectively.
Example XV
The melt pressed membranes of Example XIII were tested using single gases viz. nitrogen, toluene vapour, water vapour and butane gas, and in one instance using nitrogen saturated with toluene; the latter was achieved by passing nitrogen over the surface of liquid toluene and feeding the resultant stream to the membrane. In addition, a membrane made by solvent casting the homopolymer of perfluoro-2,2- dimethyl-1,3-dioxole was tested using butane and nitrogen. Although the nitrogen permeabilities were measured at 790 kPa, it is known from results given above that the permeability for that gas is independent of pressures comparison may therefore be made with the results obtained with the other gases and vapours.
The results are given in Table XV.
TABLE XV
Vapour/ Membrane Temp. Pressure Permeability Gas , (°C) Differential (Barrer) (kPa) Toluene A 25 4.1 0 Toluene A 52 13 0 Butane A 25 110 0 Butane B 25 90 0 Butane C* 25 100 9000 Nitrogen A 25 790 580 Nitrogen B 25 790 620 Nitrogen C 25 790 1675 Water A 70 32 3000**
Water A 25 3.4 100 Nitrogen (saturated with toluene) A 25 34C~ 575 Note: * 02/N2 selectivity was measured on the membrane used in this test, and was~found to be 1.9. This is confirmation of the integrity of the membrane ** At 25°C and a pressure drop of 3.2 kPa, the permeability to water was considerably lower Membrane A was the melt cast membrane of Example XIII, thickness = 200 microns Membrane B was the melt cast membrane of Example XIII, thickness = 80 microns r n 1~ T.
..~ ~) v. : .,~
_ 29 _ Membrane G was formed from the homopolymer by sol ent casting, thickness = 100 microns.
The results show that very high selectivities were obtained for the melt pressedl membranes, whereas the homopolymer membrane appears to be selective to butane in single gas measurements; results reported above would indicate that significantly lower selectivity could be expected with mixed gases.
Example XyI
The effect of temperature on selectivity was measured at both ambient temperature and 6°C using the melt pressed membranes of Example XIIT. The gases used were CFC 12/air and CFC 114/air mixtures. The results are given in Table XVI.
TABLE XVI
Gas Temp. Permeability Selectivity Mixture (C) (Barrers) Membrane thickness = 200 microns I 25 505 1005 40 12.5 2,0 I 6 360 810 15 23.3 2.3 II 25 535 1065 <3 >100 2.1 TI 6 405 860 <3 >100 2.1 Membrane ~~hickness= 80 microns I 25 300 590 40 7.5 2.0 I 6 270 535 19 14.4 2.0 II 25 290 555 9 31 1.9 II 6 320 620 <3 >100 1.9 Note Gas mixture I = CFC
12/air Gas mixture II = CFC
114/air The results ions show that, under the condit used, selectivity temperature.
improved at the lower ~~~J ,~~ :L~;
Example XV:CI
The procedure of Example XVI was repeated using three membranes and three different temperatures. The results obtained are given in Table XVII.
TABLE XVI:L
Temp. Permeability Selectivity (°C) (Barrers) (a) solvent cast membrane formed from the copolymer of 1p perfluoro-2,2-dimethyl-1,3-dioxole having a Tg of 160°C
6 145 330 11 12.7 2.3 25 175 420 13 13.0 2.4 50 235 460 35 6.3 2.1 (b) melt pressed membrane formed from the copolymer of perfluoro-2,2-dimethyl-1,3-dioxole having a Tg of 240°C
6 360 810 15 23.3 2.3 475 915 37 12.8 1.9 50 555 1050 52 10.2 2.0 (c) solvent cast membrane formed from the homopolymer of perfluoro-2,2-dimethyl-1,3-dioxole 6 955 1845 222 4.3 1.9 1020 1915 196 5.2 1.9 The results obtained would indicate that the membranes may exhibit higher selectivity at lower 25 temperatures.
Examble XVIII
A membrane of the homopolymer of perfluoro-2,2-dimethyl-1,3-dioxole was prepared using the solvent casting technique described in Example V; the membrane thickness 33 microns. It was tested for permeability using synthetic air and several single gases with a feed pressure of 790 kPa.
The results obtained axe given in Table XVITI.
~~~ ~f~~
TABLE XVIII
cas Permeab i 1 ity (24°c) He 3600 Barrer H2 3300 Barrer 02 (air feed) 1540 Barrer N2 (air feed) 810 Barrer N2 830 Barrer CH4 690 Barrer C2H6 500 Barrer It is believed that the permeabilities of hydrogen and helium are the highest measured with these gases, with the exception of polytrimethylsilylpropyne.
The latter polymer, however, is known to have unstable gas transport properties e.g. see U.S 4 859 215.
Moreover, the permeability of nitrogen in mixed gas tests was similar to the permeability of nitrogen in single gas tests, which. indicates that there was no measurable interaction between copermeating oxygen and nitrogen molecules or competition for permeation paths in the polymer.
Example XIX
The membrane of Example XVIII was tested in air separation over a broad range of feed pressures, to measure the effect of pressure on the permeability of permanent gases through the homopolymer of perfluoro-2,2-dimethyl°1,3-dioxole.
The results are given in Table XIX.
f°
TABLE XIX
Pressure of 02 Flux 02/N2 Feed Air (Barter) Selectivity 270 1500 1.95 450 1560 2.0 620 1610 2.0 790 1620 2.0 960 1610 1.95 1140 1610 1.95 1480 1610 1.95 1830 1560 1.9 2170 1550 1.9 The results confirm that the partial pressure across the membrane has little affect on the permeability of oxygen through the membrane. In addition, the membrane had a stable permeation performance; in a two week air-separation test, it continuously produced 31~
oxygen from a 790 kPa air feed with no change in oxygen flux and oxygen/nitrogen selectivity. Stable permeation performance is indispensible for the application of the polymer as a practical membrane.
Example XX
Comparative tests of oxygen permeability were carried out on membranes that had been formed from olefin polymers containing bulky rings in the backbone, to assess the effect that the ring structure may be having on the permeability of the membrane. The polymers used were (a) a membrane of a polymer known as "Zeonex" from Nippon Zeon, and (b) a copolymer disclosed in European 0 303 246 and in US Patent 4 320 239 by B.F.Goodrich.
oxygen and nitrogen permeabilities were measured and compared with membranes formed from dipolymers of - 32 °
r~ n r, ~~
~~~:~i~,i~ ':~
perfluoro-2,2-dimethyl-1,3-dioxole and tetrafluoroethylene.
The results obtained are given in Table XI~.
The permeabili.ti.es were measured at 30°C using an air feed at 790 kPa pressure.
Polymer Tg Permeabi.lity Selectivity (°C) 02 (Barrer) 02/N2 (a) 135 1.9 5.3 (b) 135 0.81 6.0 This example shows that the membranes of the invention exhibit much higher fluxes, by 2-3 orders of magnitude, than the olefin polymers with bulky rings that were tested.
FIELD OF THE INVENTION
The present invention relates to selectively permeable membranes formed from a polymer, especially a dipolymer, of a perfluorodioxole. The membranes may be used in a variety of end-uses, two examples of which are oxygen enrichment of gaseous admixtures of oxygen and nitrogen e.g. air, and enrichment of the amount of gaseous organic compounds in admixtures with oxygen and/or nitrogen e.g. air. In embodiments, the gaseous, organic compound may be a gaseous fluorocarbon or a volatile organic compound.
BACKGROUND TO THE INVENTION
Methods for the enrichment and/or separation of gaseous organic compounds from gaseous admixtures, including gaseous admixtures with oxygen and/or nitrogen e.g. air, are known. For example, D.L. Roberts and G.D.
Ching discuss the recovery of fluorocarbon gases using silicone rubber membranes, specifically a silicone rubber on a polysulfone backing, in I&EC Process Design and Development, 1986, 25 971. It was found that the permeability of gaseous fluorocarbons varied substantially with the structure of the fluorocarbon, with some fluorocarbons exhibiting greater permeability through the membrane than nitrogen whereas other fluorocarbons exhibited lower permeability than nitrogen. For example, whereas carbon tetrafluoride exhibited a permeability through the silicone rubber membrane that was 15 times less than that of nitrogen, the permeability of dichlorodifluoromethane i.e. the fluorocarbon available commercially as Freon~ 12, was greater than that of nitrogen.
~~~ ~~y A process for the recovery and concentration of organic vapours from a stream of air containing no more than 20 000 ppm of the organic vapour is described in US
Patent 4 553 983 of R.W. Baker et al, which issued 1985 November 19. Such a process requires a selectivity for the organic vapour over air, as measured by nitrogen, of at least 50. The membrane that was exemplified was a silicone rubber membrane. Separation of organic vapours from air is also discussed by R.W. Baker et al in Journal of Membrane Science 31 (1987) 259-271.
Copolymers of perfluoro-2,2-dimethyl-1,3-dioxole, especially dipolymers with tetrafluoroethylene, are known for use as cladding materials in optical fibre constructions as well as certain electronics applications, and as moulded articles and films. Such dipolymers and uses thereof are described in US Patent 4 754 009 of E.N. Squire, which issued 1988 June 28, as well as in US Patent 4 530 569 of E.N. Squire, which issued 1985 July 23. Perfluorinated dioxole monomers and polymers are disclosed in US Patent 4 565 855 of B.C.
Anderson, D.C. England and P.R. Resnick, which issued 1986 January 21.
Films formed from polymers containing fluorine and having a ring structure in the main polymer chain are disclosed in published Japanese patent application No.
63 60 932 of Asahi Glass KK, published 1988 October 27.
The films have a thickness of less than 50 microns. Gas or liquid selectively permeable membranes.formed from fluoropolymers having a ring structure in the main polymer chain are disclosed in published Japanese patent application No. 63 264 101 of Asahi Glass KK, published 1988 November Ol. The membrane that is exemplified was formed from perfluoroallyl vinyl ether and had fluxes, in cm3.cm/cm2.sec.cm Hg (Barrers), as follows: He = 106;
H2 = 26; C02 = 8.2; 02 = 3.9: N2 = 0.87 and - 3 - 2~~~~~c CH4 = 0.24: a Barrer is 0.0365 m3.m/mZ.hr.bar.
The separation coefficients were calculated to be as follows: OZ/NZ = 4 . 4 ; COZ/CH4 = 35: He/CH4 = 452 ~ He/NZ =
12 2 and HZ/NZ = 3 0 .
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
A selectively permeable membrane that may be used in, for example, oxygen enrichment of gaseous admixtures containing oxygen and in the enrichment of gaseous organic compounds in admixture with oxygen and/or nitrogen e.g. air, has now been found. The membrane exhibits preferential permeability of oxygen at a high flux rate.
Accordingly, the present invention provides a selectively permeable membrane for the separation of gaseous mixtures, said membrane being formed from an amorphous polymer of perfluoro-2;2- dimethyl-1,3-dioxole and exhibiting an oxygen/nitrogen selectivity of at least 1.4.
In a still further embodiment, the membrane is a supported membrane, in the form of a film or coating on a porous support, or in the form of a hollow fibre.
The present invention further provides a membrane separation device containing a selectively permeable membrane formed from an amorphous polymer of perfluoro-2,2-dimethyl-1,3-dioxole.
In addition, the present invention provides a method for the enrichment of the amount of a gaseous organic compound in a gaseous admixture of said organic compound and at least one of oxygen and nitrogen, said method comprising:
(a) providing in a membrane separation cell a selectively permeable membrane having a feed side and a permeate side, said membrane having an oxygen/nitrogen selectivity of at least 1.4 and formed from an amorphous _4_ polymer of perfluoro-2,2- dimethyl--1,3-dioxole, and feeding said admixture to the feed side of said membrane, said membrane being at a temperatu~.~e of less than the glass transition temperature of the polymer;
(b) optionally applying a pressure differential across the membrane; and (c) removing from the feed side of the membrane, a gaseous admixture of said organic compound that is enriched in the amount of organic compound.
l0 In a preferred embodiment of the method of the present invention, the selective permeation of nitrogen over the organic compound is at least 10:1.
In a further embodiment, the organic compound is a gaseous fluorocarbon.
In another embodiment, the organic compound is a hydrocarbon.
Furthermore, the present invention provides a method for the enrichment of the amount of a gas in a gaseous admixture with another gas, especially oxygen in a gaseous admixture of oxygen and nitrogen, said method comprising:
(a) providing in a membrane separation cell a selectively permeable membrane having a feed side and a permeate side, said membrane having an oxygen/nitrogen selectivity of at least 1.4 and formed from an amorphous polymer of perfluoro-2,2- dimethyl-1,3-dioxole, and feeding said admixture to the feed side of said membrane, said membrane being at a temperature of less than the glass transition temperature of the polymer;
(b) optionally applying a pressure differential across the membrane; and (c) removing from the permeate. side of the membrane, a gaseous admixture that is enriched in the amount of one gas.
In a preferred embodiment of the method of the ?r r - 5 _ ~0~:~~ ~,~
present invention, the selective permeation of oxygen over nitrogen is at least 1.7:1.
In preferred embodiments of the membranes and methods of the present invention, the polymer is a copolymer of perfluoro-2,2-dimethyl-1,3-dioxole, especially a copolymer having a complementary amount of at least one monomer selected from the group consisting of tetrafluoroethylene, perfluoromethyl vinyl ether, vinylidene fluoride and chlorotrifluoroethylene.
In other embodiments, the polymer is a homopolymer of perfluoro-2,2-dimethyl-1,3-dioxole.
In further embodiment, the polymer is a dipolymer of perfluoro-2,2-dimethyl-1,3-dioxole and a complementary amount of tetrafluoroethylene, especially a dipolymer containing 65-99 mole % of perfluoro-2,2-dimethyl-1,3-dioxole and having a glass transition temperature of at least 140°C.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
The present invention is illustrated by the embodiment shown in the drawing in which:
Figure 1 is a schematic representation of a process for the separation of gaseous mixtures using a selectively permeable membrane.
DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
Apparatus for a membrane separation process is schematically illustrated in Figure 1. In that apparatus, shown generally by 1, membrane separation cell 2 has a feed or upstream section 3 and a permeate section 4 that are separated by selectively permeable membrane 5. Feed section 3 has connected thereto an inlet pipe 6 which, as shown, has an oven 7 for heating a gaseous mixture being fed to the apparatus, and inlet pump 8. In addition, inlet section 3 has connected thereto an outlet pipe 9. Permeate section 4 is connected to outlet transfer line 10 that in the embodiment shown has an 2~3~~~~~;
outlet pump 11.
Tn operation, a gaseous admixture is fed through inlet pipe 6 to feed section 3 of membrane separation cell 2. The gaseous admixture may be at ambient temperature but pressurized to above atmospheric pressure by inlet pump 8; however, the gaseous admixture may be heated by means of oven 7. After a period of time, a hold-up time which will depend primarily on the flow rate of the gaseous admixture and the volume of the feed l0 Section, the portion of the gaseous admixture that has not passed through the selectively permeable membrane 5 will pass from the feed section 3 by means of outlet pipe 9. Outlet pipe 9 may, in turn, be the inlet pipe of apparatus for further enrichment of the gaseous admixture or other process capable of using the gaseous admixture.
The gaseous material passing through the selectively permeable membrane passes from permeate section 4 through outlet transfer line 10 which as shown contains a pump 11t pump 11 will preferably be a pump capable of imparting a partial vacuum to the permeate section. Outlet transfer line 11 might be vented directly or indirectly to the atmosphere, or be the feed pipe for another process: as described herein, the gaseous admixture in outlet transfer line 10 will have substantially less of the gaseous organic compound than the inlet feed stream, and it might be environmentally acceptable to vent outlet transfer line 10 to the atmosphere.
As will be appreciated by persons skilled in the art, the feed section of the membrane cell may be pressurized i.e. be at a pressure above atmospheric pressure, and/or the permeate section may be partially evacuated i.e. be at a pressure below atmospheric pressure. In one preferred embodiment, the feed section is above atmospheric pressure and in another preferred 2~~~~~~
_ 7 _ embodiment, the permeate section is partially evacuated.
Alternatively, there may be no pressure differential per se, but rather a concentration differential with diffusion across the membrane.
The selectively permeable membrane is formed.
from an amorphous polymer of perfluoro-2,2-dimethyl-1,3-dioxole. In embodiments, the polymer is a homopolymer of perfluoro-2,2-dimethyl-1,3-dioxole. In other embodiments, the polymer is a copolymer of perfluoro-2,2-dimethyl-1,3-dioxole, including copolymers having a complementary amount of at least one monomer selected from the group consisting of tetrafluoroethylene, perfluoromethyl vinyl ether, vinylidene fluoride and chlorotrifluaroethylene. In preferred embodiments, the polymer is a dipolymer of perfluoro-2,2-dimethyl-1,3-dioxole and a complementary amount of tetrafluoroethylene, especially such a polymer containing 65-99 mole % of perfluoro-2,2-dimethyl-1,3-dioxole. The amorphous polymer preferably has a glass transition temperature of at least 140°C, and more preferably at least 180°C. Glass transition temperature (Tg) is known in the art and is the temperature at which the polymer changes from a brittle, vitreous or glassy state to a rubbery or plastic state.
Examples of dipolymers axe described in further detail in the aformentioned U.S. Patent 4 754 009 of E.N. Squire.
The glass transition temperature of the amorphous polymer will vary with the actual polymer of the membrane, especially the amount of tetrafluoroethylene or other comonomer that may be present. Examples of Tg are shown in Figure 1 of the aforementioned US Patent 4 754 009 of E.N. Squire as ranging from about 260°G for dipolymers with tetrafluoroethylene having low amounts of tetrafluoroethylene comonomer down to less than 100°C for ~~~~e~~~
_8_ the dipolymers containing at least 60 mole % of tetrafluoroethylene.
Useful membrane configurations include, but are not limited to, thin film composite films and composite hollow fibres, especially in which a thin layer or coating of the amorphous polymer is supported by a porous substrate of another polymer, and monolithic film and fibre membranes. The membranes must be thin, in order to maximize the rate of gas transmission through the membrane, preferably less than 0.01 mm and especially less than 0.001 mm in thickness; in the case of composite membranes, such thickness refers to the thickness of the layer or coating of the amorphous polymer.
The membranes of the present invention may be~
manufactured by a variety of methods known to those :skilled in the art, particularly in the light of the versatile processability of the perfluorodioxole polymers. These methods include solvent and melt film-casting and fibre-casting methods, as well as coating techniques; other fluoropolymers tend to be either melt processible but not solvent processible or not processible by either method.
The gaseous admixture fed to the membrane separation cell may be an admixture of oxygen, usually containing nitrogen and especially in the form of air, and optionally containing a gaseous organic compound.
The gaseous organic compound may be a compound that is a gas at atmospheric temperature and pressure, but will more commonly be the vapour of an organic compound that is in liquid form at atmospheric pressure and temperature. The gaseous admixture will usually be at about ambient temperature but may be at higher temperatures; the membranes used in the method of the present invention are capable of being used at elevated temperature, including in some embodiments at 2~~~~~~
_ g _ temperatures above 100°C. However, the membranes should be used at a temperature below the glass transition temperature, and especially at least 30°C below the glass transition temperature, of the amorphous polymer used to form the membrane. In preferred embodiments, the glass transition temperature is at least 140°C and especially at least 180°C. The method of the present invention may be operated at relatively low temperatures e.g. as low as about 10°C, and especially about 15°C.
The gas admixture may originate from a wide variety of sources. For example, the gaseous admixture may be air, or an admixture derived from air e.g. an admixture that has been enriched in oxygen using for example the method of the present invention.
In alternative embodiments, the gaseous admixture may be an admixture of, for example, air containing an organic compound. In one embodiment, the admixture may be from a process for the manufacture of foamed materials, in which event the organic compound may be a fluorocarbon or hydrocarbon of the type used in such processes. Alternatively, the admixture may be from a dry cleaning process in which event the organic compound may be a hydrocarbon or chlorinated hydrocarbon, or from a coating process in which event the organic compound may be mixtures of aromatic and aliphatic hydrocarbons and derivatives thereof e.g. ethers, alcohols and the like.
The admixture may be vapours from storage vessels or a wide variety of processes that utilize liquid or gaseous organic compounds in steps in the process. The gaseous admixtures may contain a wide range of amounts of organic compounds, but would normally contain an amount that cannot be discharged to the atmosphere because of regulatory or other reasons; such amounts might be as low as 0.01% by weight or substantially higher. Moreover, the gaseous admixture may be an admixture that has been _ g _ '~ M n ~ ~ 1 f ~'~
.,t 1 '.3 subjected to an enrichment process according to the procedures described herein or by another method.
It will be appreciated that a wide range of organic compounds may be subjected to the method of the present invention. Examples of such compounds include fluorocarbons e.g. trichloromonofluoromethane, dichlorodifluoromethane, monochlorotrifluoromethane, trichlorotrifluoroethane, dichlorotetrafluoroethane, monochloropentafluoroethane, CF3CH2F, hydrocarbons e.g. butane, pentane, hexane, octane, cyclohexane, benzene, toluene, xylene, naphtha and other mixed hydrocarbon fractions, chlorinated hydrocarbon solvents, polar organic compounds e.g. methyl ethyl ketone, and the like.
As exemplified hereinafter, oxygen and nitrogen tend to preferentially pass through the selectively permeable membranes, with oxygen being passed in preference to nitrogen, and does so at high flux. This combination of selectivity and high flux is generally in cantrast to other membranes, and provides a method for the enrichment of a gaseous admixture e.g. air, with respect to the amount of oxygen relative to the amount of nitrogen in the admixture in a manner that is believed to be of significant practical importance, and the enrichment occurs on the permeate side of the membrane.
This provides a method for the enrichment of one or more gases in a gaseous admixture relative to other gases in the admixture.
In embodiments in which the gaseous admixture contains an organic compound, oxygen and nitrogen are preferentially passed through the membrane, especially at relatively low concentrations of the organic compound.
Thus, the feed stream is enriched in the organic compound. This tends to be in contrast to processes known in the art e.g. the process as described in U.S.
~~. L;! s Patent 4 553 983. Moreover, oxygen and nitrogen pass through the membrane at a high rate: i.e. there is high flux rate, which is necessary in order that use of the membrane according to the present method be of commercial interest.
The membranes of the present invention exhibit a selectivity of axygen over nitrogen of at least 1.4:1, and preferably at least 1.7:1. In addition, the membranes preferably exhibit a flux for oxygen of at least 100 Barrens, especially at least 20o Barrens and in particular at least 500 Barrens. For practical applications of the membranes of the invention, the membranes need to be virtually free of defects, as will be appreciated by those skilled in the art: such a requirement is understood to be embodied in the oxygen/nitrogen selectivity of at least 1.4:1.
As discussed above, the membrane may be used for the oxygen enrichment of a gaseous admixture i.e. to provide gaseous streams having a relatively high content of oxygen. Alternatively, the membranes may be used to enrich a gaseous admixture containing organic compounds with respect to the amount of organic compounds in the admixture, one example of which is separation of gaseous fluorocarbons from a process having a waste stream containing gaseous fluorocarbons, prior to discharge of the waste stream to the environment. Another example is the separation of volatile organic compounds e.g.
hydrocarbons, from a stream containing such compounds.
In addition, the membranes may be used to separate or enrich other gaseous mixtures, examples of which include, but are not limited to, oxygen/carbon dioxide, hydrogen/methane, hydrogen/nitrogen, carbon dioxide/methane, helium/methane, helium/nitrogen, hydrogen/carbon monoxide, ammonia/nitrogen and carbon dioxide/nitrogen. Applications include oxygen enrichment, refinery hydrocarbon recovery, ammonia purge gas treatment, natural gas dehydration, sour gas treating, helium separations, pollution control, underwater gills for diving and air treatment in, for example, shopping malls. Examples of uses of gas separation membranes are given in "Economics of Gas Separation Membranes" by R.W. Spillman, Chemical Engineering Progress January 1989, pages 41-62, .
The perfluorodioxoles membranes described herein are expected to be outstanding membrane materials for membrane-based gas separations requiring high gas permeability. There are two key criteria in the selection of membrane materials for practical membrane-based gas separation viz. product flow rate and product purity. Thus, a useful membrane material should exhibit a high permeability towards one or more components and a low permeability towards the other components of the feed mixture, which is sometimes expressed as a high fast-gas permeability or flux and high selectivity, the latter being defined as the ratio of the permeability of the fast (higher permeability) and slow (lower permeability) gases. These two praperties of high permeability and high selectivity are seldom found together. High permeability dipolymers generally exhibit low selectivity and high selectivity dipolymers generally exhibit low permeation or flux rates.
While many practical membrane constructions seek a balance between flux and selectivity, others rely on one or the other to achieve gas separations. For example, a high selectivity membrane dipolymer is needed for the production of 97-99% nitrogen from air in an inexpensive manner, even if the permeability is mediocre and a high membrane area is required. Conversely, a highly permeable material may be preferred for a lightweight membrane unit for the production of 23-35%, ~~~~~~r:~,' especially 23-27~, oxygen-enriched air for enhanced combustion. The examples hereinafter show that membranes of the invention are of the latter type, exhibiting exceptionally high gas permeabilities and relatively low selectivity toward most combinations of gases. The permeabilities tend to be relatively very high compared to other glassy polymers, and of the order of one to two orders of magnitude greater than known commercially available glassy polymer membrane materials. The membranes of the invention are believed to be of particular interest for applications demanding ultrahigh gas permeability.
In Examples I-IV hereinafter, gas permeation properties of the perfluorodioxole dipolymers were measured using samples of dense film membranes. The samples were cut into discs and mounted in a permeation cell, so as to form a feed gas chamber and a permeate gas chamber, the latter being operated at lower pressure.
In the air separation tests, the feed stream was °ompressed air, which was provided at a flow rate that was high enough to ensure a constant feed-stream composition: the permeate oxygen-enriched air was removed at atmospheric pressure. Permeate flow rate was measured by the volumetric displacement of a soap bubble in a Calibrated burette, and permeate composition was determined by gas chromatography. In most of the single-gas permeation tests, the feed gas was provided at a pressure ranging from 21 kPa to 3500 kPa.
In some low pressure tests, the permeate gas flow rate was determined by measuring the rate of increase in pressure in a constant volume evacuated chamber. The permeability of the dipolymers for the gas was determined from the volume of the evacuated chamber and the thickness and surface area of the membrane.
The present invention is illustrated by the 14 _ following examples.
EX~1HIPLE I
Membranes having a thickness of 0.25 mm were melt pressed from a dipolymer of perfluoro-2,2-dimethyl-1,3-dioxole and tetrafluoroethylene having a glass transition temperature of 253°C.
In single-gas and mixed gas permeation tests, using the permeation test method described above, the films exhibited exceptionally high permeability toward the components of air viz. 990 Barrens with respect to oxygen and 490 Barrens with respect to nitrogen; a Barren is defined by the following formula:
Barren = 10-10 [cm3(STP).cm]/[cm2.sec.cmHg]
Furthermore, it was found that the oxygen and nitrogen permeabilities were not functions of the feed pressures, nor of the membrane thickness.
single-gas permeability of dichlorodifluoro-methane (CFC-12) vapour through the films was also measured using both constant pressure and the constant volume techniques. In this instance, it was found that the permeability of CFC-12 was a strong function of the pressure applied. The results obtained are summarized in Table I.
TABhE I
CFC-12 Pressure CFC-12 Permeability 124 kPa 14 Barren 207 kPa 75 Barren 469 kPa 250 Barren Thus, it was found that lowering the partial , pressure of the CFC-12 resulted in a decrease in the permeability of the CFC-12 through the film, thus indicating that the partial pressure of the fluorocarbon was having an effect on the properties of the membrane that affected permeability.
rrhe results obtained show that a membrane of the dipolymer of this Example when used with a mixture of CFC-12 and air i.e. a CFC-12-in-air stream, would preferentially pass the components of air to the permeate stream (in the permeate section of the cell) and enrich the retentate stream (in the upstream or feed section of the cell) with the less permeable CFC-12 vapor. If the feed CFC-12/air mixture has a low CFC-12 concentration (and thus low CFC-12 partial pressure), the CFC
permeability would be expected to be low and the selectivity of N2/CFC-12 to be high.
EXAMPLE II
Membranes were prepared from a dipolymer of perfluoro-2,2-dimethyl-1,3-dioxole and tetrafluoro-ethylene having a glass transition temperature of 166°C
using melt pressing and solvent casting techniques. The melt pressed films had a thickness of 0.25 mm and the solvent cast films had a thickness of 0.025 mm.
The solvent cast films were formed from solution (15~ by weight of the dipolymer in FC-75: FC-75 is the tradename of a commercial solvent available from 3M
Company, and is perfluoro (2-butyl tetrahydrofuran)).
Membranes having a thickness of 0.38 mm were cast from the solution onto a glass plate and the solvent was allowed to evaporate slowly: the dry membrane of the dipolymer that was obtained had a thickness of 0.025 mm.
The films were subjected to single-gas permeation tests using the procedure described above, using air, nitrogen, CFC-12 and CF3CH2F, the latter being one of the hydrogen-containing fluorocarbons being developed as replacements for chlorofluorocarbons and referred to as HFC-134A. The results obtained are summarized in Table II.
Permeation results are summarized in Table II.
TABLE II
Gas Membrane Thickness Feed Pressure Permeability 02 0.250 mm 3.55 MPa air 350 Barrer 02 0.025 mm 0.79 MPa air 340 Barrer N2 0.250 mm 3.55 MPa air 130 Barrer N2 0.025 mm 0.79 MPa air 130 Barrer CFC-12 0.025 mm 0.17 MPa 45 Barrer HFC-134A 0.025 mm 0.17 MPa 20 Barrer The results show that, for oxygen and nitrogen, membrane thickness had no apparent effect on the permeability results obtained.
The results also indicate that the dipolymer of this Example exhibits lower permeability than the dipolymer in Example I: the latter had a higher content of perfluoro-2,2-dimethyl-1,3-dioxole. However, ' permeability towards the components of air is still exceptionally high, being at least two orders of magnitude higher than polytetrafluoroethylene.
EXAMPLE III
Membranes with a thickness of 0.25 mm were melt-pressed from three dipolymers of perfluoro-2,2-dimethyl-1,3-dioxole and tetrafluoroethylene of different dioxole contents and glass transition temperatures (Tg).
The results of air separation tests using air with a feed stream pressure of 700-3550 kPa are given in Table III.
TABLE III
Dioxole Tg Permeability Selectivity (mole %) 02 02/N2 66 166°C 340 Barrer 2.6 76 203°C 380 Barrer 2.3 86 253°C 990 Barrer 2.05 In the air-separation tests, these dipolymer membranes exhibited exceptionally high 02 and N2 permeabilities. The membrane prepared from the lowest Tg-grade dipolymer had the highest 02/N2 selectivity, whereas the membrane prepared from the highest Tg-grade dipolymer had the highest 02 permeability and lowest 02jN2 selectivity. In comparison, commercial air separation membranes formed from glassy polymers tend to be more selective but with substantially lower flux towards oxygen, with O~ permeability typically ranging from about 1.3 Barrer (polysulfone) to 30 Barrer (poly 4-methylpentene); a very small proportion of known membranes or films exhibit permeabilities in excess of 100 Barrers for oxygen. The results of Table III also show that membranes of the invention may be prepared with a range of permeation properties.
EXAMPLE IV
Single-gas permeation tests were conducted using a membrane prepared from a membrane of the high-Tg dipolymer described in Example III. A number of different gases were tested. As a comparison, tests were also conducted on a membrane formed from polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE).
A number of permeability measurements were conducted, using pressures that were generally in the range of 350-1750 kPa, it being the understanding that the permeability of the gases listed in Table IV is only a slight function of pressure in this pressure range. An exception to this understanding may be carbon dioxide, and the pressure used for this gas was 1750 kPa.
The results obtained are given in Table IV.
,... ,' r, TABLE IV
Gas Permeability Dipolymer PTFE
C02 2800 Barren 12 Barren He 2700 Barren H2 2200 Barren 9.8 Barren 02 990 Barren 4.2 Barren Nz 490 Barren 1.4 Barren Ethylene 350 Barren Methane 340 Barren Ethane 180 Barren l0 The results obtained illustrate the high permeability obtainable with the membranes of the present invention. Whereas the selectivity demonstrated by the dipolymer and polytetrafluoroethylene membranes are similar, and believed to be relatively typical of glassy, non-rubbery polymers, the dipolymer membranes exhibit relatively very high permeability. It is apparent that the membranes of the invention have potential in many membrane-based gas separations including, but not limited to, H2/CH4, H2/N2, C02/CH4, He/CH4, He/N2, C02/02 and C02/N2.
EXAMPLE V
Permeation measurements were conducted using a permeation cell that was immersed in water in a temperature-controlled water bath. The permeate from the permeation cell was passed through a sampler bulb of a gas chromatograph, to measure the composition of the permeate, and then to a soap film capillary to measure the permeate flow rate. Concentrations in gas mixtures were measured with a HP Gas Chromatograph model 5700A
3o followed by a Spectra Physics Integrator type model SP4400. Pressure and pressure drop could be measured in the cell.
The membrane was placed on a porosive sinter (pore size 15 - 20 microns) and held in place using two ,, ~ :z (;
Teflon~ rings. The effective membrane area for mass transfer was 9.62 cm2 (3.5 cm diameter).
When mixtures of gases were being tested, a purging stream with about l0 times the permeate flow rate was used to ensure a constant feed concentration, and the purged stream was monitored to determine the feed concentration. For measurements with single gases, the cell was purged at the beginning of each experiment for a short period of time.
Melt pressed membranes were prepared by placing polymer in a mould and heating to a temperature of about 20°C above the glass transition temperature (Tg). When that temperature was reached, the polymer was treated by applying pressure and releasing it, using pressures of. up to 50 tonnes/12.5 cm diameter of the membrane, for 5 minutes. The mould was then slowly cooled under a pressure of 40 tonnes/12.5 cm diameter, to room temperature. The resultant thick powder was transferred to the center of a flat plate covered by aluminum foil.
Another aluminum foil-covered flat plate was mounted on it, without any spacer. The two plates were heated in a melt press, at minimal pressure, to a temperature of 100°C above Tg, after which the pressure was raised to 40 tonnej12.5 cm diameter, and the sample was pressed for 10 minutes. The sample was then cooled slowly to room temperature under pressure, and the aluminum foil was peeled off carefully.
Cast membranes were prepared from solutions of the polymers in FC-75 solvent. The solution was warmed to 50-60°C, and filtered through a 3 micron filter. The filtered solution was cast onto clean glass, and dried at ambient temperature in a dust free environment. The membrane was further dried in an oven at 80°C for at least 2 hours, and than in an oven at 110°C overnight.
Membranes were formed from a dipolymer of p" w ,° n m perfluoro-2,2-dimethyl°1,3-dioxole and tetrafluoroethylene having a glass transition temperature of 240°C, by solvent casting from a 2.5% solution in FC-75 solvent using the procedure described above, with the heating at 110°C being for 12 hours. The resultant membrane was 20 micron thick.
The mixed gas fed to the permeation cell had the following composition: N2 78.25%, 02 20.67% and CFC-Z2 1.0%.
Further experimental details and the results obtained are given in Table V. Measurements were made at 20°C under steady-state conditions in this and the following examples, unless stated to the contrary.
TABLE V
pressure Permeability Selectivity (kpa) (Barrers) 700 242 114 16 2.1 7.1 445 263 112 11 2.4 10.3 The results show that the selectivity to the fluorocarbon gas is dependent on the pressure used in the process, improving at lower pressures.
EXAMPLE VI
A membrane was made by melt pressing the polymer of Example III. The membrane was 80 micron thick and was prepared by heating to 340°C under a total pressure of 20 tonnes total ram force. The gas used was the same mixture as used in Example V.
Further details and the results obtained are given in Table VI.
r r a 2~~~r~~~~~7 TABLE VI
Pressure Permeability Selectivity (kPa) (Barrers) 790 592 299 40 2.0 7.5 The selectivity obtained was similar to that obtained in Example V, but the permeability was significantly higher.
EXAMPLE VII
The permeability of nitrogen and CFC-12 as single gases was measured using the membrane of Example V.
Further details and the results obtained are given in Table VII.
TABLE VII
Gas Pressure Permeability Selectivity (kPa) (Barrers) N2/CFC-12 This example, together with Example VI, illustrates the plasticizing action of fluorocarbon gases on the membranes of the invention.
EXAMPLE VIII
Membranes were formed from a dipolymer of perfluoro-2,2-dimethyl-1,3-dioxole and tetrafluoroethylene having a glass transition temperature of 160°C, by solvent casting from a 4.0% solution in FC-75 solvent, using the procedure of Example V, the membrane being heated at 110°C for 12 hours. The resultant membrane was 10 micron thick.
The mixed gas fed to the permeation cell had the following composition: N2 78.25%, 02 20.67% and CFC-12 1.0%.
__ t~. ;"' is ~ ,-.J -..l Further experimental detail~~ and the results obtained are given in Table VIII.
TABLE VIII
Pressure Permeability .Selectivity (kPa) (Barrers) Oz NZ CFC-12 Oz/NZ Nz/CFC-12 790 372 1.56 13 2.4 11.8 445 403 166 12 2.4 1.4.2 The results illustrate use of a membrane of the invention with mixed gases.
EXAMPLE IX
Membranes were prepared from a number of different polymers of perfluoro-2,2-dimethyl 1,3-dioxole, using the solvent casting method described in Example VII. The membranes were tested for permeability using the gaseous mixture of Example VII.
Further details and the results obtained are given in Table IX.
TABLE IX
Polymer* Pressure Permeability Selectivity (kPa) (Barrers) NZ CFC-12 OZ/NZ N~/CFC-12 A 790 444 332 203 1.3 1.6 445 463 306 63 1.5 4.8 B 790 586 444 362 1.3 1.2 445 505 436 317 1.3 1.4 C 790 2097 1143 312 1.8 3.7 445 2228 1165 211 1.8 5.5 240 2200 1166 160 1.9 7.3 * A = Copolymer of perfluoro methyl vinyl ether and perfluoro-2,2-dimethyl-1,3-dioxole, with a T9 of 139°C; membrane thickness was 15 microns.
B = Copolymer of chlorotrifluoroethylene and perfluoro-2,2-dimethyl-1,3-dioxole, with a T9 of 157°C; membrane thickness was 13 microns.
C = Homopolymer of perfluoro-2,2-dimethyl 1,3-dioxole, with a T of 330°C; membrane thickness was 17 micr~ns.
The results show that the homopolymer exhibits high permeation rates. The homopolymer and copolymer with perfluoromethyl vinyl ether exhibit significant selectivity of nitrogen over the fluorocarbon gas.
EXAMPLE X
A copalymer of perfluoro(methyl vinyl ether) and perfluoro-2,2-dimethyl 1,3-dioxole having a Tg of 139°C
was solvent cast into membranes from a 10% solution of the polymer in FC-75 solvent and dried as described in Example VII. A second membrane was prepared in the same manner, except that the membrane was heated to a temperature above the Tg, to a temperature of 150°C for an additional hour. Both membranes were tested with single gases.
The results obtained are given in Table X.
TABLE X
Membrane Temp. of Permeability Selectivity Thickness Drying Barrers (microns) N2/CFC-12 N2/CFC-12 55 Below Tg 47/12 3.9 63 Above Tg 63/18 3.8 The results show that, for the polymer from which the membrane was formed, heating the membrane above the glass transition point gave an apparent modest increase in the permeability of the membrane but did Y~ot affect the selectivity of the membrane under the conditions used.
EXAMPLE XI
Membranes formed from poly-[perfluoro(2-methylene-4-methyl-1,3-dioxolane)] i.e. polymer of the aforementioned U.S. 3 308 107, had been tested for w permeability using a volumetric method at 25°C.
Further experimental details and the results obtained are given in Table XI.
TABLE XI
Gas Permeability Gas Permeability He 650 Barrers Hz 240 Barrers COZ* 67 Barrers CO 8 Barrers CH4* 2 Barrers Ox* 3 6 Barrers Nz* 10 Barrers __ * Results are averages of data for single gases and binary mixtures.
The results show that the polymer of US
3 308 107 exhibit permeabilities to gases that were 2.5 to 40 times lower than those measured as described above in examples herein. A comparison with the data for the homopolymer in Table IX shows that the data obtained from the membrane of this invention is 60-110 times more permeable. Selectivities were, however, higher with the membrane of US 3 308 107. It is believed that the permeability data for methane may be in error, being smaller than would be expected.
EXAMPLE XII
Permeability measurements were conducted on a variety of membranes, formed by melt pressing or by solvent casting. The method of measurement of permeability was that described in Example V. The gases used were nitrogen and CFC-12, the permeabilities for which were measured separately.
Further experimental details and the results obtained are given in Table XII.
~.rtt~L~ xm Polymer* Permeability SelE:Ctivity (Barrers) NZ CFC-12 (Nz/CFC-12) F 2725 1168 2~3 G 63 18 3.5'.
H 53 2.5 21 49 53 0.92 * E = Copolymer of per.fluoro-2,2-dimethyl - -1,3-dioxole and tetrafluoroethylene, T9 =
240°C, thickness = 80 microns, formed by melt pressing, pressure used was 143 kPa;
F = Homopolymer of perfluoro-2,2-dimethyl -1,3-dioxole, T9 = 330°C, thickness = 24 microns, formed by solvent casting from FC-75 solvent, pressure used. was 136 kPa;
G = Copolymer of perfluoro-2,2-dimethyl -1,3-dioxole and perfluoromethyl vinyl ether, T9 = 137°C, thickness = 63 microns, formed by solvent casting from FC-75 solvent, pressure used was 136 kPa;
H = Copolymer of vinylidene fluoride and perfluoro-2,2-dimethyl-1,3-dioxole, with a T9 of 82'C: thickness = 55 microns, formed by solvent casting from FC-75 solvent, pressure used was 274 kPa prig. Note:~at a lower pressure, no flux of CFC-12 was observed;
J = Copolymer of perfluoro-2,2-dimethyl -1,3-dioxole and tetrafluoroethylene, T =
160°C, thickness = 200 microns, formed ~by melt pressing, pressure used was 136 kPa.
The results show effects of comonomer on permeability and selectivity to nitrogen and CFC-12.
EXAMPLE XIII
Using procedures described above, membranes were melt pressed from a copolymer of perfluoro-2,2-dimethyl -1,3-dioxole and tetrafluoroethylene having a T9 = 240'C. Permeation tests were conducted using mixtures of oxygen, nitrogen and a fluorocarbon gas or of nitrogen and a hydrocarbon gas.
Further experimental details and the results obtained are given in Table XIII.
TABhE XIII
Gas Permeability Selectivity Flux Mixture (Barrers) (ml/sec) (a) Membrane thickness 200 microns A 505 1005 41 12.5 2.0 0.0152 B 255 480 4 61 1.9 0.0082 C 535 1065 <3 >100 2.0 0.0156 D 555 1080 37 15 1.9 0.0161 E 570 1130 71 8 2.0 0.0167 F 405 - 55 7.4 - 0.0100 (b) Membrane ickness 80 microns th A 300 590 40 7.5 2.0 0.0217 B 215 450 15 14 2.1 0.0161 C 290 565 9 31 1.9 0.0208 D 350 640 28 12.5 1.8 0.0250 E 365 700 49 7.5 1.9 0.0263 F 385 - 130 3 - 0.0238 Note: The membranes shown in the Table were prepared from the same polymer but in different laboratories Gas mixture CFC 12 (MW = 120.9): air in ratio of A = 1:99 Gas mixture HCFC 123 (MW = 152.9):air in ratio of B =
0.43:99.57 Gas mixture CFC 114(MW = 170.9): air in a ratio C = of 1:99 Gas mixture HCFC 142b (MW = 100.5):air in a ratio D = of 1:99 Gas mixture HCFC 134a (MW = 102.0): air in ratio E = of 1:99 Gas mixture butane (MW = 58.1):nitrogen in a ratio F = of 1:99 The results show a correlation of increasing selectivity with increasing molecular weight of the fluorocarbon gas or hydrocarbon gas. In one of the membranes, two highest molecular weight gases had the selectivities of above 100 and 60 respectively.
On the basis of the above results, it would appear that selectivity related to molecular size, rather than is whether the gas is a fluorocarbon or a hydrocarbon.
Example XIV
A 1:1 mixture of homopolymer of perfluoro-2,2--dimethyl-i,3-dioxole and the copol.yroer of perflt:or'c~-~~i2T3.;~ ~' dimethyl-1,3-dioxo:le and tetrafluoroe thylene having a 'r9 of 240°C was solvent cast from FC:-75 solvent to give a membrane having a thickness of 95 microns after drying overnight at 110°C. Permeability me~sure.ments were conducted on the membrane using the HCFC 123/air mixture of Example XIII.
The Oz/NZ selectivity obtained was 2.1 at 790 kPa, while the Nz/HCFC 123 selectivity was 4.3. The Oz and.-Nz permeabilities were 669 and 317 Barrers, respectively.
Example XV
The melt pressed membranes of Example XIII were tested using single gases viz. nitrogen, toluene vapour, water vapour and butane gas, and in one instance using nitrogen saturated with toluene; the latter was achieved by passing nitrogen over the surface of liquid toluene and feeding the resultant stream to the membrane. In addition, a membrane made by solvent casting the homopolymer of perfluoro-2,2- dimethyl-1,3-dioxole was tested using butane and nitrogen. Although the nitrogen permeabilities were measured at 790 kPa, it is known from results given above that the permeability for that gas is independent of pressures comparison may therefore be made with the results obtained with the other gases and vapours.
The results are given in Table XV.
TABLE XV
Vapour/ Membrane Temp. Pressure Permeability Gas , (°C) Differential (Barrer) (kPa) Toluene A 25 4.1 0 Toluene A 52 13 0 Butane A 25 110 0 Butane B 25 90 0 Butane C* 25 100 9000 Nitrogen A 25 790 580 Nitrogen B 25 790 620 Nitrogen C 25 790 1675 Water A 70 32 3000**
Water A 25 3.4 100 Nitrogen (saturated with toluene) A 25 34C~ 575 Note: * 02/N2 selectivity was measured on the membrane used in this test, and was~found to be 1.9. This is confirmation of the integrity of the membrane ** At 25°C and a pressure drop of 3.2 kPa, the permeability to water was considerably lower Membrane A was the melt cast membrane of Example XIII, thickness = 200 microns Membrane B was the melt cast membrane of Example XIII, thickness = 80 microns r n 1~ T.
..~ ~) v. : .,~
_ 29 _ Membrane G was formed from the homopolymer by sol ent casting, thickness = 100 microns.
The results show that very high selectivities were obtained for the melt pressedl membranes, whereas the homopolymer membrane appears to be selective to butane in single gas measurements; results reported above would indicate that significantly lower selectivity could be expected with mixed gases.
Example XyI
The effect of temperature on selectivity was measured at both ambient temperature and 6°C using the melt pressed membranes of Example XIIT. The gases used were CFC 12/air and CFC 114/air mixtures. The results are given in Table XVI.
TABLE XVI
Gas Temp. Permeability Selectivity Mixture (C) (Barrers) Membrane thickness = 200 microns I 25 505 1005 40 12.5 2,0 I 6 360 810 15 23.3 2.3 II 25 535 1065 <3 >100 2.1 TI 6 405 860 <3 >100 2.1 Membrane ~~hickness= 80 microns I 25 300 590 40 7.5 2.0 I 6 270 535 19 14.4 2.0 II 25 290 555 9 31 1.9 II 6 320 620 <3 >100 1.9 Note Gas mixture I = CFC
12/air Gas mixture II = CFC
114/air The results ions show that, under the condit used, selectivity temperature.
improved at the lower ~~~J ,~~ :L~;
Example XV:CI
The procedure of Example XVI was repeated using three membranes and three different temperatures. The results obtained are given in Table XVII.
TABLE XVI:L
Temp. Permeability Selectivity (°C) (Barrers) (a) solvent cast membrane formed from the copolymer of 1p perfluoro-2,2-dimethyl-1,3-dioxole having a Tg of 160°C
6 145 330 11 12.7 2.3 25 175 420 13 13.0 2.4 50 235 460 35 6.3 2.1 (b) melt pressed membrane formed from the copolymer of perfluoro-2,2-dimethyl-1,3-dioxole having a Tg of 240°C
6 360 810 15 23.3 2.3 475 915 37 12.8 1.9 50 555 1050 52 10.2 2.0 (c) solvent cast membrane formed from the homopolymer of perfluoro-2,2-dimethyl-1,3-dioxole 6 955 1845 222 4.3 1.9 1020 1915 196 5.2 1.9 The results obtained would indicate that the membranes may exhibit higher selectivity at lower 25 temperatures.
Examble XVIII
A membrane of the homopolymer of perfluoro-2,2-dimethyl-1,3-dioxole was prepared using the solvent casting technique described in Example V; the membrane thickness 33 microns. It was tested for permeability using synthetic air and several single gases with a feed pressure of 790 kPa.
The results obtained axe given in Table XVITI.
~~~ ~f~~
TABLE XVIII
cas Permeab i 1 ity (24°c) He 3600 Barrer H2 3300 Barrer 02 (air feed) 1540 Barrer N2 (air feed) 810 Barrer N2 830 Barrer CH4 690 Barrer C2H6 500 Barrer It is believed that the permeabilities of hydrogen and helium are the highest measured with these gases, with the exception of polytrimethylsilylpropyne.
The latter polymer, however, is known to have unstable gas transport properties e.g. see U.S 4 859 215.
Moreover, the permeability of nitrogen in mixed gas tests was similar to the permeability of nitrogen in single gas tests, which. indicates that there was no measurable interaction between copermeating oxygen and nitrogen molecules or competition for permeation paths in the polymer.
Example XIX
The membrane of Example XVIII was tested in air separation over a broad range of feed pressures, to measure the effect of pressure on the permeability of permanent gases through the homopolymer of perfluoro-2,2-dimethyl°1,3-dioxole.
The results are given in Table XIX.
f°
TABLE XIX
Pressure of 02 Flux 02/N2 Feed Air (Barter) Selectivity 270 1500 1.95 450 1560 2.0 620 1610 2.0 790 1620 2.0 960 1610 1.95 1140 1610 1.95 1480 1610 1.95 1830 1560 1.9 2170 1550 1.9 The results confirm that the partial pressure across the membrane has little affect on the permeability of oxygen through the membrane. In addition, the membrane had a stable permeation performance; in a two week air-separation test, it continuously produced 31~
oxygen from a 790 kPa air feed with no change in oxygen flux and oxygen/nitrogen selectivity. Stable permeation performance is indispensible for the application of the polymer as a practical membrane.
Example XX
Comparative tests of oxygen permeability were carried out on membranes that had been formed from olefin polymers containing bulky rings in the backbone, to assess the effect that the ring structure may be having on the permeability of the membrane. The polymers used were (a) a membrane of a polymer known as "Zeonex" from Nippon Zeon, and (b) a copolymer disclosed in European 0 303 246 and in US Patent 4 320 239 by B.F.Goodrich.
oxygen and nitrogen permeabilities were measured and compared with membranes formed from dipolymers of - 32 °
r~ n r, ~~
~~~:~i~,i~ ':~
perfluoro-2,2-dimethyl-1,3-dioxole and tetrafluoroethylene.
The results obtained are given in Table XI~.
The permeabili.ti.es were measured at 30°C using an air feed at 790 kPa pressure.
Polymer Tg Permeabi.lity Selectivity (°C) 02 (Barrer) 02/N2 (a) 135 1.9 5.3 (b) 135 0.81 6.0 This example shows that the membranes of the invention exhibit much higher fluxes, by 2-3 orders of magnitude, than the olefin polymers with bulky rings that were tested.
Claims (29)
1. A selectively permeable membrane for the separation of gaseous mixtures comprising a film or coating of an amorphous polymer of perfluoro-2,2-dimethyl-1,3-dioxole on a porous support, said membrane exhibiting an oxygen/nitrogen selectivity of at least 1.4 and having a permeability to oxygen of at least 100 Banners.
2. The membrane of Claim 1 in which the permeability to oxygen is at least 200 Barrens.
3. The membrane of Claim 1 in which the permeability to oxygen is at least 500 Barrens.
4. The membrane of any one of Claims 1-3 in which the membrane is a monolithic membrane.
5. The membrane of any one of Claims 1-3 in which the membrane is in the form of a hollow fibre.
6. The membrane of any one of Claims 1-3 in which the film or coating and the porous support are different polymers.
7. The membrane of any one of Claims 1-6 in which the polymer is a copolymer of perfluoro-2,2-dimethyl-1,3-dioxole.
8. The membrane of Claim 7 in which the polymer is a copolymer of perfluoro-2,2-dimethyl -1,3-dioxole and a complementary amount of at least one monomer selected from the group consisting of tetrafluoroethylene, perfluoromethyl vinyl ether, vinylidene fluoride and chlorotrifluoroethylene.
9. The membrane of any one of Claims 1-6 in which the polymer is a homopolymer of perfluoro-2,2-dimethyl-1,3-dioxole.
10. The membrane of Claim 8 in which the polymer is a dipolymer of perfluoro-2,2-dimethyl1,3-dioxole and a complementary amount of tetrafluoroethylene.
11. The membrane of Claim 10 in which the polymer is a dipolymer containing 65-99 mole % of perfluoro-2,2-dimethyl-1,3-dioxole and having a glass transition temperature of at least 140°C.
12. A method for the enrichment of the amount of a gas in a gaseous admixture with another gas, said method comprising:
(a) providing in a membrane separation cell a selectively permeable membrane having a feed side and a permeate side, said membrane being virtually defect-free with an oxygen/nitrogen selectivity of at least 1.4 and a permeability to oxygen of at least 100 Barrers, said membrane comprising a film or coating of an amorphous polymer of perfluoro-2,2- dimethyl-1,3-dioxole on a porous support, and feeding said admixture to the feed side of said membrane, said membrane being at a temperature of less than the glass transition temperature of the polymers and (b) removing from the permeate side of the membrane, a gaseous admixture that is enriched in the amount of one gas.
(a) providing in a membrane separation cell a selectively permeable membrane having a feed side and a permeate side, said membrane being virtually defect-free with an oxygen/nitrogen selectivity of at least 1.4 and a permeability to oxygen of at least 100 Barrers, said membrane comprising a film or coating of an amorphous polymer of perfluoro-2,2- dimethyl-1,3-dioxole on a porous support, and feeding said admixture to the feed side of said membrane, said membrane being at a temperature of less than the glass transition temperature of the polymers and (b) removing from the permeate side of the membrane, a gaseous admixture that is enriched in the amount of one gas.
13. The method of Claim 12 in which the gaseous admixture is an admixture of a gaseous organic compound and at least one of oxygen and nitrogen.
14. The method of Claim 12 or Claim 13 in which the membrane has a selective permeation of nitrogen over the organic compound of at least 10:1.
15. The method of Claim 13 in which the organic compound is a gaseous fluorocarbon.
16. The method of Claim 13 in which the organic compound is a gaseous hydrocarbon.
17. The method of Claim 12 in which the gases are oxygen and nitrogen.
18. The method of Claim 12 in which the gaseous admixture is air.
19. The method of Claim 12 in which the gases are at least two gases selected from the group consisting of oxygen, nitrogen, hydrogen, helium, methane, ammonia, carbon monoxide and carbon dioxide.
20. The method of any one of Claims 12-19 an which a pressure differential is applied across the membrane.
21. The method of any one of Claims 12-20 in which the temperature of the membrane is at least 30°C
lower than the glass transition temperature of the polymer.
lower than the glass transition temperature of the polymer.
22. The method of any one of Claims 12-21 in which the polymer is a copolymer of perfluoro-2,2-dimethyl-1,3-dioxole.
23. The method of Claim 22 in which the polymer is a copolymer of perfluoro-2,2-dimethyl-1,3-dioxole and a complementary amount of at least one monomer selected from the group consisting of tetrafluoroethylene, perfluoromethyl vinyl ether, vinylidene fluoride and chlorotrifluoroethylene.
24. The method of any one of Claims 12-21, in which the polymer is a homopolymer of perfluoro-2,2-dimethyl-1,3-dioxole.
25. The method of Claim 22 in which the polymer is a dipolymer of perfluoro-2,2-dimethyl-1,3-dioxole and a complementary amount of tetrafluoroethylene.
26. The method of Claim 25 in which the polymer is a dipolymer containing 65-99 mole % of perfluoro-2,2-dimethyl-1,3-dioxole and having a glass transition temperature of at least 140°C.
27. The method of any one of Claims 12-26 in which the gases additionally contain water.
28. The method of any one of Claims 12-27 in which the permeability to oxygen is at least 200 Barrers.
29. The method of Claim 28 in which the permeability to oxygen is at least 500 Barrers.
Applications Claiming Priority (3)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US36640089A | 1989-06-15 | 1989-06-15 | |
US07/366,400 | 1989-06-15 | ||
PCT/CA1990/000195 WO1990015662A1 (en) | 1989-06-15 | 1990-06-13 | Perfluorodioxole membranes |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
CA2055446A1 CA2055446A1 (en) | 1990-12-16 |
CA2055446C true CA2055446C (en) | 2000-08-29 |
Family
ID=23442852
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
CA002055446A Expired - Lifetime CA2055446C (en) | 1989-06-15 | 1990-06-13 | Perfluorodioxole membranes |
Country Status (6)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (1) | US5051114B2 (en) |
EP (1) | EP0477224B1 (en) |
JP (1) | JP3027606B2 (en) |
AU (1) | AU5830090A (en) |
CA (1) | CA2055446C (en) |
WO (1) | WO1990015662A1 (en) |
Families Citing this family (143)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US5051113A (en) * | 1990-06-13 | 1991-09-24 | Du Pont Canada Inc. | Air-intake system for mobile engines |
US5053059A (en) * | 1990-06-13 | 1991-10-01 | Du Pont Canada Inc. | Air-intake system for residential furnaces |
US5116650A (en) * | 1990-12-03 | 1992-05-26 | W. L. Gore & Associates, Inc. | Dioxole/tfe copolymer composites |
US5273572A (en) * | 1992-05-29 | 1993-12-28 | Membrane Technology And Research, Inc. | Process for removing an organic compound from water |
US5238562A (en) * | 1992-10-13 | 1993-08-24 | Transfair Corporation | Fiber membrane elements and modules and methods of fabrication for improved fluid separation |
US5284583A (en) * | 1992-10-13 | 1994-02-08 | Transfair Corporation | Fiber membrane elements and modules and methods of fabrication for fluid separation |
US5238471A (en) * | 1992-10-14 | 1993-08-24 | E. I. Du Pont De Nemours And Company | Spray-applied fluoropolymer films for gas separation membranes |
EP0667803A4 (en) * | 1992-11-04 | 1997-04-02 | Membrane Tech & Res Inc | Gas-separation process. |
US5281255A (en) * | 1992-11-04 | 1994-01-25 | Membrane Technology And Research, Inc | Gas-separation process |
US5526641A (en) * | 1993-02-18 | 1996-06-18 | The University Of Chicago | NOx reduction method |
US5636619A (en) * | 1993-02-18 | 1997-06-10 | The University Of Chicago | Method and apparatus for reducing cold-phase emissions by utilizing oxygen-enriched intake air |
US5649517A (en) * | 1993-02-18 | 1997-07-22 | The University Of Chicago | Variable oxygen/nitrogen enriched intake air system for internal combustion engine applications |
US5640845A (en) * | 1993-02-18 | 1997-06-24 | The University Of Chicago | Nitrogen spark denoxer |
US5288304A (en) * | 1993-03-30 | 1994-02-22 | The University Of Texas System | Composite carbon fluid separation membranes |
WO1995003949A1 (en) * | 1993-07-27 | 1995-02-09 | E.I. Du Pont De Nemours And Company | Membrane closure device |
US5730780A (en) * | 1993-10-15 | 1998-03-24 | Opus Services, Inc. | Method for capturing nitrogen from air using gas separation membrane |
EP0649676A1 (en) * | 1993-10-20 | 1995-04-26 | L'air Liquide, Societe Anonyme Pour L'etude Et L'exploitation Des Procedes Georges Claude | Fluoropolymer posttreatment of gas separation membranes |
CA2118428A1 (en) * | 1993-10-20 | 1995-04-21 | Ian C. Roman | Treatment of gas separation membranes with inert solvent |
DE4410597C2 (en) * | 1994-03-26 | 1999-07-22 | Geesthacht Gkss Forschung | Method and device for reducing emissions from breathing lines in storage tanks |
US5693121A (en) * | 1994-11-17 | 1997-12-02 | Enerfex, Inc. | Semi-permeable membrane separation process for the production of very high purity nitrogen |
US5858065A (en) * | 1995-07-17 | 1999-01-12 | American Air Liquide | Process and system for separation and recovery of perfluorocompound gases |
US5785741A (en) | 1995-07-17 | 1998-07-28 | L'air Liquide, Societe Anonyme Pour L'etude Et L'exploitation Des Procedes Georges, Claude | Process and system for separation and recovery of perfluorocompound gases |
GB9610889D0 (en) * | 1996-05-24 | 1996-07-31 | E E G Engineering Limited | Oxygen enrichment in aircraft cabin atmospheres |
IE80909B1 (en) | 1996-06-14 | 1999-06-16 | Air Liquide | An improved process and system for separation and recovery of perfluorocompound gases |
US5759237A (en) * | 1996-06-14 | 1998-06-02 | L'air Liquide Societe Anonyme Pour L'etude Et, L'exploitation Des Procedes Georges Claude | Process and system for selective abatement of reactive gases and recovery of perfluorocompound gases |
US5678526A (en) * | 1996-08-09 | 1997-10-21 | Ford Global Technologies, Inc. | System and diagnostic method for providing internal combustion engine with oxygen enriched air |
DE19704508A1 (en) * | 1996-09-27 | 1998-08-13 | Gore W L & Ass Gmbh | Gas absorption with membrane contactors |
US5876604A (en) * | 1996-10-24 | 1999-03-02 | Compact Membrane Systems, Inc | Method of gasifying or degasifying a liquid |
US5730779A (en) * | 1996-10-31 | 1998-03-24 | Air Products And Chemicals, Inc. | Fluorochemical recovery and recycle using membranes |
WO1998032521A1 (en) * | 1997-01-23 | 1998-07-30 | Carbon Membranes Ltd. | Recovery of perfluorinated compounds and hydrofluorocarbon gases using molecular sieve membranes |
US5772734A (en) * | 1997-01-24 | 1998-06-30 | Membrane Technology And Research, Inc. | Membrane hybrid process for treating low-organic-concentration gas streams |
US6037592A (en) * | 1997-02-14 | 2000-03-14 | Underground Systems, Inc. | System for measuring gases dissolved in a liquid |
US5749942A (en) * | 1997-02-14 | 1998-05-12 | Raychem Corporation | Apparatus for extracting a gas from a liquid and delivering the gas to a collection station |
US5779763A (en) * | 1997-03-07 | 1998-07-14 | Membrane Technology And Research, Inc. | Process for recovering semiconductor industry cleaning compounds |
US6953496B2 (en) * | 1997-03-07 | 2005-10-11 | Vapor Systems Technologies, Inc. | Sub-atmospheric fuel storage system |
US5985002A (en) * | 1997-03-07 | 1999-11-16 | Vapor Systems Technologies, Inc. | Fuel storage system with vent filter assembly |
US6293996B1 (en) | 1997-03-07 | 2001-09-25 | Vapor Systems Technologies, Inc. | Fuel storage system with vent filter assembly |
US5914154A (en) * | 1997-05-30 | 1999-06-22 | Compact Membrane Systems, Inc. | Non-porous gas permeable membrane |
IT1298257B1 (en) * | 1998-02-17 | 1999-12-20 | Ausimont Spa | perfluorodioxols |
US6469185B1 (en) | 1998-02-17 | 2002-10-22 | Ausimont S.P.A. | Perfluorodioxoles |
US5960777A (en) | 1998-02-20 | 1999-10-05 | Compact Membrane Systems, Inc. | Combustion engine air supply system |
US6032484A (en) * | 1998-03-23 | 2000-03-07 | Air Products And Chemicals, Inc. | Recovery of perfluorinated compounds from the exhaust of semiconductor fabs with recycle of vacuum pump diluent |
US5976222A (en) * | 1998-03-23 | 1999-11-02 | Air Products And Chemicals, Inc. | Recovery of perfluorinated compounds from the exhaust of semiconductor fabs using membrane and adsorption in series |
US6055808A (en) * | 1998-06-22 | 2000-05-02 | The University Of Chicago | Method and apparatus for reducing particulates and NOX emissions from diesel engines utilizing oxygen enriched combustion air |
ITMI981506A1 (en) | 1998-06-30 | 1999-12-30 | Ausimont Spa | AMORPHOUS FLUOROPOLYMER MANUFACTURES |
US8245978B1 (en) | 1998-06-30 | 2012-08-21 | L'air Liquide Societe Anonyme Pour L'etude Et L'exploitation Des Procedes Georges Claude | Multiple ASM OBIGGS with different permeability and selectivity membranes |
US6126721A (en) * | 1998-08-28 | 2000-10-03 | Compact Membrane Systems, Inc. | Oxygen enriched air supply apparatus |
US6173567B1 (en) | 1998-09-14 | 2001-01-16 | The University Of Chicago | Method to reduce diesel engine exhaust emissions |
WO2000029093A1 (en) * | 1998-11-16 | 2000-05-25 | Compact Membrane Systems, Inc. | Highly selective gas permeation |
US6197091B1 (en) * | 1999-03-05 | 2001-03-06 | The Boc Group, Inc. | Ozone purification process |
US6190436B1 (en) * | 1999-03-05 | 2001-02-20 | The Boc Group, Inc. | Ozone purification process |
CA2367547A1 (en) * | 1999-04-14 | 2000-10-19 | Pall Corporation | Porous membrane |
US6770202B1 (en) | 1999-04-14 | 2004-08-03 | Pall Corporation | Porous membrane |
US6849185B1 (en) | 1999-05-14 | 2005-02-01 | Pall Corp | Charged membrane |
IT1312320B1 (en) * | 1999-05-25 | 2002-04-15 | Ausimont Spa | (PER) FLUORINATED AMORPHOUS POLYMER MEMBRANES. |
US6517725B2 (en) * | 1999-05-27 | 2003-02-11 | Porous Media | Oil dehydrator |
JP4696329B2 (en) * | 1999-06-30 | 2011-06-08 | Dic株式会社 | Nematic liquid crystal composition and liquid crystal display device using the same |
US6299777B1 (en) * | 1999-08-17 | 2001-10-09 | Cms Technology Holdings, Inc. | Osmotic distillation process |
JP4357046B2 (en) * | 1999-10-01 | 2009-11-04 | 株式会社東芝 | Gas recovery device |
US6478852B1 (en) * | 2000-02-18 | 2002-11-12 | Cms Technology Holdings, Inc. | Method of producing nitrogen enriched air |
US6592650B2 (en) | 2000-05-19 | 2003-07-15 | Membrane Technology And Research, Inc. | Gas separation using organic-vapor-resistant membranes and PSA |
US6544316B2 (en) | 2000-05-19 | 2003-04-08 | Membrane Technology And Research, Inc. | Hydrogen gas separation using organic-vapor-resistant membranes |
US6572679B2 (en) | 2000-05-19 | 2003-06-03 | Membrane Technology And Research, Inc. | Gas separation using organic-vapor-resistant membranes in conjunction with organic-vapor-selective membranes |
US6572680B2 (en) | 2000-05-19 | 2003-06-03 | Membrane Technology And Research, Inc. | Carbon dioxide gas separation using organic-vapor-resistant membranes |
US6361583B1 (en) | 2000-05-19 | 2002-03-26 | Membrane Technology And Research, Inc. | Gas separation using organic-vapor-resistant membranes |
US6361582B1 (en) | 2000-05-19 | 2002-03-26 | Membrane Technology And Research, Inc. | Gas separation using C3+ hydrocarbon-resistant membranes |
US6579341B2 (en) | 2000-05-19 | 2003-06-17 | Membrane Technology And Research, Inc. | Nitrogen gas separation using organic-vapor-resistant membranes |
US6540813B2 (en) | 2000-06-13 | 2003-04-01 | Praxair Technology, Inc. | Method of preparing composite gas separation membranes from perfluoropolymers |
US6543428B1 (en) | 2000-06-14 | 2003-04-08 | Caterpillar Inc. | Intake air separation system for an internal combustion engine |
US6453893B1 (en) | 2000-06-14 | 2002-09-24 | Caterpillar Inc | Intake air separation system for an internal combustion engine |
US6289884B1 (en) | 2000-06-14 | 2001-09-18 | Caterpillar Inc. | Intake air separation system for an internal combustion engine |
DE10030643C1 (en) * | 2000-06-29 | 2002-02-07 | Geesthacht Gkss Forschung | Process for high pressure gas separation |
US6406517B1 (en) | 2000-09-08 | 2002-06-18 | Cms Technology Holdings, Inc. | Designed selectivity gas permeable membranes |
GB2367136A (en) * | 2000-09-21 | 2002-03-27 | Draegerwerk Ag | Electrochemical gas sensor with membrane of specified copolymer |
JP2002252001A (en) * | 2000-12-22 | 2002-09-06 | Asahi Glass Co Ltd | Gas diffusion electrode and solid high polymer type fuel cell equipped with this |
US7247313B2 (en) | 2001-06-27 | 2007-07-24 | Advanced Cardiovascular Systems, Inc. | Polyacrylates coatings for implantable medical devices |
US6566021B2 (en) | 2001-07-26 | 2003-05-20 | Micro Lithography, Inc. | Fluoropolymer-coated photomasks for photolithography |
US7129009B2 (en) * | 2002-05-14 | 2006-10-31 | E. I. Du Pont De Nemours And Company | Polymer-liquid compositions useful in ultraviolet and vacuum ultraviolet uses |
US7217426B1 (en) | 2002-06-21 | 2007-05-15 | Advanced Cardiovascular Systems, Inc. | Coatings containing polycationic peptides for cardiovascular therapy |
US7005137B1 (en) | 2002-06-21 | 2006-02-28 | Advanceed Cardiovascular Systems, Inc. | Coating for implantable medical devices |
US7396539B1 (en) | 2002-06-21 | 2008-07-08 | Advanced Cardiovascular Systems, Inc. | Stent coatings with engineered drug release rate |
US6997970B2 (en) | 2002-06-25 | 2006-02-14 | Carleton Life Support Systems, Inc. | Oxygen/inert gas generator |
US6723152B2 (en) | 2002-07-01 | 2004-04-20 | Praxair Technology, Inc. | Gas separation using membranes formed from blends of perfluorinated polymers |
US6896717B2 (en) * | 2002-07-05 | 2005-05-24 | Membrane Technology And Research, Inc. | Gas separation using coated membranes |
US7491233B1 (en) | 2002-07-19 | 2009-02-17 | Advanced Cardiovascular Systems Inc. | Purified polymers for coatings of implantable medical devices |
US6630011B1 (en) | 2002-09-17 | 2003-10-07 | Membrane Technology And Research, Inc. | Nitrogen removal from natural gas using two types of membranes |
US6719824B1 (en) * | 2003-01-24 | 2004-04-13 | Cms Technology Holdings, Inc. | Cyclic membrane separation process |
US6887300B2 (en) * | 2003-01-24 | 2005-05-03 | Cms Technology Holdings, Inc. | Cyclic membrane separation process |
JP4987467B2 (en) * | 2003-01-24 | 2012-07-25 | シー・エム・エス・テクノロジーズ・ホールディングス・インコーポレイテッド | Circulating membrane separation process |
US7479227B2 (en) * | 2003-03-07 | 2009-01-20 | Membrane Technology And Research, Inc. | Liquid-phase separation of low molecular weight organic compounds |
US20040173529A1 (en) * | 2003-03-07 | 2004-09-09 | Membrane Technology And Research, Inc. | Liquid-phase separation of low molecular weight organic compounds |
US20040182246A1 (en) * | 2003-03-21 | 2004-09-23 | Grantham Rodger P. | Sub-atmospheric fuel storage system |
ITMI20030774A1 (en) * | 2003-04-15 | 2004-10-16 | Solvay Solexis Spa | FLUORINATED POLYMERS. |
US8791171B2 (en) | 2003-05-01 | 2014-07-29 | Abbott Cardiovascular Systems Inc. | Biodegradable coatings for implantable medical devices |
US7563454B1 (en) | 2003-05-01 | 2009-07-21 | Advanced Cardiovascular Systems, Inc. | Coatings for implantable medical devices |
US6949132B2 (en) * | 2003-11-05 | 2005-09-27 | Systel, Llc | Axial degassing transfer lines |
US7713331B2 (en) * | 2003-11-05 | 2010-05-11 | Rheodyne, Llc | Axial transfer line degassing |
US7175693B2 (en) * | 2004-01-30 | 2007-02-13 | United Technologies Corporation | Method for preventing fuel infiltration into microporous polymer membranes |
US8070859B2 (en) * | 2004-02-25 | 2011-12-06 | Membrane Technology And Research, Inc. | Method for producing a non-porous membrane |
US20050217479A1 (en) * | 2004-04-02 | 2005-10-06 | Membrane Technology And Research, Inc. | Helium recovery from gas streams |
US7244443B2 (en) | 2004-08-31 | 2007-07-17 | Advanced Cardiovascular Systems, Inc. | Polymers of fluorinated monomers and hydrophilic monomers |
US20060134569A1 (en) * | 2004-12-21 | 2006-06-22 | United States Of America As Respresented By The Department Of The Army | In situ membrane-based oxygen enrichment for direct energy conversion methods |
US20060171845A1 (en) * | 2005-01-31 | 2006-08-03 | Dakota Technologies, Inc. | Sensors for measuring analytes |
US7648660B2 (en) * | 2005-03-24 | 2010-01-19 | E.I. Du Pont De Nemours And Company | Continuous coating process for composite membranes |
US8926731B2 (en) | 2005-09-13 | 2015-01-06 | Rasirc | Methods and devices for producing high purity steam |
JP5537029B2 (en) * | 2005-09-13 | 2014-07-02 | ラサーク | How to produce high purity steam |
JP5507079B2 (en) * | 2006-04-28 | 2014-05-28 | 旭化成ケミカルズ株式会社 | Gas separation membrane |
US20070256969A1 (en) | 2006-05-04 | 2007-11-08 | Porogen Corporation | Composite Perfluorohydrocarbon Membranes, Their Preparation and Use |
US9028859B2 (en) | 2006-07-07 | 2015-05-12 | Advanced Cardiovascular Systems, Inc. | Phase-separated block copolymer coatings for implantable medical devices |
US8197578B2 (en) | 2006-07-26 | 2012-06-12 | Busek Company, Inc. | Liquid degasser for a space device |
CA2669279C (en) * | 2006-10-27 | 2017-01-03 | Cms Technologies Holdings, Inc. | Removal of water and methanol from fluids |
US8002874B2 (en) | 2007-03-06 | 2011-08-23 | Membrane Technology And Research, Inc. | Liquid-phase and vapor-phase dehydration of organic/water solutions |
US8496831B2 (en) * | 2007-08-30 | 2013-07-30 | Membrane Technology And Research, Inc. | Dehydration processes using membranes with hydrophobic coating |
WO2009054460A1 (en) | 2007-10-26 | 2009-04-30 | Asahi Kasei Chemicals Corporation | Gas separation membrane |
US20090166173A1 (en) * | 2007-12-31 | 2009-07-02 | Sarang Gadre | Effluent gas recovery process for silicon production |
JP2009195833A (en) * | 2008-02-21 | 2009-09-03 | Junkosha Co Ltd | Gas permeable tube and degassing module |
WO2010080753A1 (en) * | 2009-01-07 | 2010-07-15 | Cms Technologies Holdings, Inc. | Separations with highly selective fluoropolymer membranes |
US8187361B2 (en) | 2009-07-02 | 2012-05-29 | America Air Liquide, Inc. | Effluent gas recovery system in polysilicon and silane plants |
US9718023B2 (en) * | 2010-11-04 | 2017-08-01 | Ube Industries, Ltd. | Gas separation membrane module and gas separation method |
CN102527241B (en) * | 2010-11-04 | 2015-11-04 | 宇部兴产株式会社 | Gas separation membrane module and gas separating method |
JP5530954B2 (en) * | 2011-02-21 | 2014-06-25 | 株式会社日本自動車部品総合研究所 | Fuel cell |
CA2786065C (en) | 2011-08-15 | 2018-03-27 | Cms Technologies Holdings, Inc. | Combination membrane system for producing nitrogen enriched air |
US9044712B2 (en) | 2011-09-12 | 2015-06-02 | Idex Health & Science, Llc | Supersaturated fluid degassing |
US9120834B2 (en) | 2013-10-31 | 2015-09-01 | Cms Technologies Holdings, Inc. | Membrane separation of ionic liquid solutions |
US9643124B2 (en) * | 2014-02-19 | 2017-05-09 | Membrane Technology And Research, Inc. | Gas separation membranes based on fluorinated and perfluorinated polymers |
US9636632B2 (en) * | 2014-02-19 | 2017-05-02 | Membrane Technology And Research, Inc | Gas separation membranes based on fluorinated and perfluorinated polymers |
US8828121B1 (en) * | 2014-02-19 | 2014-09-09 | Membrane Technology And Research, Inc. | Gas separation membranes based on perfluorinated polymers |
US9975084B2 (en) | 2014-02-19 | 2018-05-22 | Membrane Technology And Research, Inc. | Fluid separation processes using membranes based on fluorinated and perfluorinated polymers |
CN104448097A (en) * | 2014-11-19 | 2015-03-25 | 中昊晨光化工研究院有限公司 | Perfluor dioxole-modified fluorine-containing polymer |
WO2016176468A1 (en) | 2015-04-29 | 2016-11-03 | Membrane Technology And Research, Inc. | Gas separation membranes based on fluorinated and perfluorinated polymers |
KR102118877B1 (en) | 2015-05-11 | 2020-06-05 | 컴팩트 멤브레인 시스템즈, 인코포레이티드 | Thin film composite membrane for separation of alkanes and alkenes |
EP3307422B1 (en) | 2015-06-12 | 2023-06-07 | Compact Membrane Systems, Inc. | Amorphous fluorinated copolymer gas separation membranes |
JP6838819B2 (en) * | 2015-07-01 | 2021-03-03 | スリーエム イノベイティブ プロパティズ カンパニー | Composite membranes with improved performance and / or durability and usage |
US10449485B2 (en) * | 2015-10-09 | 2019-10-22 | Ngk Insulators, Ltd. | Method of producing nitrogen-depleted gas, method of producing nitrogen-enriched gas, method of nitrogen separation, and system of nitrogen separation |
CN109152981B (en) * | 2015-10-23 | 2021-12-31 | 膜技术研究股份有限公司 | Gas separation membranes based on fluorinated and perfluorinated polymers |
US9878282B2 (en) | 2016-02-16 | 2018-01-30 | Leonard Lawrence Donahue | Partial gas separation technique for oxygen and nitrogen enrichment of atmospheric air |
CH714339B1 (en) | 2016-09-21 | 2020-06-30 | Sensirion Ag | Gas sensor. |
DE112019001660T5 (en) * | 2018-03-29 | 2020-12-10 | Compact Membrane Systems, Inc. | CARBON DIOXIDE SEPARATION MEMBRANES AND PROCESSES |
US10843133B2 (en) * | 2018-07-24 | 2020-11-24 | Kamalesh Sirkar | Separation of organic solvent mixtures |
RU2690460C1 (en) * | 2018-10-24 | 2019-06-03 | Федеральное государственное бюджетное учреждение науки Ордена Трудового Красного Знамени Институт нефтехимического синтеза им. А.В. Топчиева Российской академии наук (ИНХС РАН) | Membrane for separation of methane-containing gas mixture and method of its production |
DE102019114751A1 (en) * | 2019-06-03 | 2020-12-03 | Vaillant Gmbh | Membrane gas separator |
WO2021158173A1 (en) * | 2020-02-06 | 2021-08-12 | National University Of Singapore | Composite membrane and methods of fabrication thereof |
US20230182070A1 (en) * | 2021-12-15 | 2023-06-15 | Saudi Arabian Oil Company | Stacked membranes and their use in gas separation |
Family Cites Families (17)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US3488335A (en) * | 1964-03-11 | 1970-01-06 | Du Pont | Heterocyclic fluorine containing compounds and polymers thereof |
US3307330A (en) * | 1965-04-30 | 1967-03-07 | Du Pont | Diffusion process and apparatus |
US3308107A (en) * | 1965-04-30 | 1967-03-07 | Du Pont | Perfluoro(2-methylene-4-methyl-1, 3-dioxolane) and polymers thereof |
US3865845A (en) * | 1971-02-24 | 1975-02-11 | Paul Raphael Resnick | Fluorinated dioxoles |
US3978030A (en) * | 1973-08-01 | 1976-08-31 | E. I. Du Pont De Nemours And Company | Polymers of fluorinated dioxoles |
US4530569A (en) * | 1981-08-20 | 1985-07-23 | E. I. Du Pont De Nemours And Company | Optical fibers comprising cores clad with amorphous copolymers of perfluoro-2,2-dimethyl-1,3-dioxole |
US4754009A (en) * | 1981-08-20 | 1988-06-28 | E. I. Du Pont De Nemours And Company | Amorphous copolymers of perfluoro-2,2-dimethyl-1,3-dioxole |
US4594399A (en) * | 1981-09-28 | 1986-06-10 | E. I. Du Pont De Nemours And Company | Cyclic monomers derived from trifluoropyruvate esters, amended to polymers and polymer films from dioxoles |
US4565855A (en) * | 1981-09-28 | 1986-01-21 | E. I. Du Pont De Nemours And Company | Polymers of dioxolanes |
US4399264A (en) * | 1981-11-19 | 1983-08-16 | E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co. | Perfluorodioxole and its polymers |
US4431786A (en) * | 1982-05-06 | 1984-02-14 | E. I. Du Pont De Nemours And Company | Novel fluorodioxoles and fluorodioxole polymers |
JPS59115314A (en) * | 1982-12-13 | 1984-07-03 | イ−・アイ・デユポン・デ・ニモアス・アンド・カンパニ− | Reformed granular polytetrafluoroethylene |
US4553983A (en) * | 1984-07-31 | 1985-11-19 | Membrane Technology And Research, Inc. | Process for recovering organic vapors from air |
KR860001605A (en) * | 1984-08-13 | 1986-03-20 | 아놀드 하베이콜 | Complex Fluid Membrane |
JPS63264101A (en) * | 1987-04-20 | 1988-11-01 | Asahi Glass Co Ltd | Permselective membrane |
JPH0822929B2 (en) * | 1987-04-20 | 1996-03-06 | 旭硝子株式会社 | Method for forming thin film of perfluoropolymer |
US4810806A (en) * | 1987-07-31 | 1989-03-07 | E. I. Du Pont De Nemours And Company | Halogenated 1,3-dioxolanes and derivatives |
-
1990
- 1990-06-13 US US07538066 patent/US5051114B2/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 1990-06-13 EP EP90909033A patent/EP0477224B1/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 1990-06-13 CA CA002055446A patent/CA2055446C/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 1990-06-13 AU AU58300/90A patent/AU5830090A/en not_active Abandoned
- 1990-06-13 JP JP2508590A patent/JP3027606B2/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 1990-06-13 WO PCT/CA1990/000195 patent/WO1990015662A1/en active IP Right Grant
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
JP3027606B2 (en) | 2000-04-04 |
AU5830090A (en) | 1991-01-08 |
US5051114B2 (en) | 1996-01-16 |
JPH04505881A (en) | 1992-10-15 |
WO1990015662A1 (en) | 1990-12-27 |
EP0477224B1 (en) | 1993-03-17 |
EP0477224A1 (en) | 1992-04-01 |
US5051114B1 (en) | 1995-05-02 |
CA2055446A1 (en) | 1990-12-16 |
US5051114A (en) | 1991-09-24 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
CA2055446C (en) | Perfluorodioxole membranes | |
US5051113A (en) | Air-intake system for mobile engines | |
US5147417A (en) | Air-intake system for mobile engines | |
Robeson et al. | High performance polymers for membrane separation | |
US5053059A (en) | Air-intake system for residential furnaces | |
Pinnau et al. | Gas permeation through composite membranes | |
Pinnau et al. | Gas and vapor transport properties of amorphous perfluorinated copolymer membranes based on 2, 2-bistrifluoromethyl-4, 5-difluoro-1, 3-dioxole/tetrafluoroethylene | |
Nagai et al. | Effects of aging on the gas permeability and solubility in poly (1-trimethylsilyl-1-propyne) membranes synthesized with various catalysts | |
Pinnau et al. | Transport of organic vapors through poly (1-trimethylsilyl-1-propyne) | |
EP0354514B1 (en) | Fluoro-oxidized polymeric membranes for gas separation and process for preparing them | |
JPH08511196A (en) | Composite carbon fluid separation membrane | |
EP0649676A1 (en) | Fluoropolymer posttreatment of gas separation membranes | |
Sohn et al. | A study on the development of composite membranes for the separation of organic vapors | |
Kuehne et al. | Selective transport of sulfur dioxide through polymer membranes. 1. polyacrylate and cellulose triacetate single-layer membranes | |
US4710204A (en) | Polyphosphazene gas separation membranes | |
WO1995003949A1 (en) | Membrane closure device | |
Hughes et al. | The permeabilities of carbon dioxide, nitrous oxide and oxygen and their mixtures through silicone rubber and cellulose acetate membranes | |
JPS63264101A (en) | Permselective membrane | |
US4755192A (en) | Processes to condition gas permeable membranes | |
EA038148B1 (en) | Gas separation membranes based on fluorinated and perfluorinated polymers | |
Sada et al. | Transport of a gas through asymmetric polysulfone membranes with deposited plasma‐polymerized thin layer | |
JPH0423572B2 (en) | ||
Oh | Gas permeation through composite membranes prepared by plasma polymerization of fluorocarbon compounds | |
Lai et al. | Gas permeation in polycarbonate membranes prepared by the wet-phase inversion method | |
Kawakami et al. | SELECTIVE PERMEATION OF CARBON DIOXIDE THROUGH CELLULOSE NITRATE/POLYETHYLENE GLYCOL BLEND MEMBRANES |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
EEER | Examination request | ||
MKEX | Expiry |