CA2069097A1 - Resonant ultrasound spectroscopy - Google Patents
Resonant ultrasound spectroscopyInfo
- Publication number
- CA2069097A1 CA2069097A1 CA002069097A CA2069097A CA2069097A1 CA 2069097 A1 CA2069097 A1 CA 2069097A1 CA 002069097 A CA002069097 A CA 002069097A CA 2069097 A CA2069097 A CA 2069097A CA 2069097 A1 CA2069097 A1 CA 2069097A1
- Authority
- CA
- Canada
- Prior art keywords
- resonant
- response
- interval
- frequency range
- characterization
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Abandoned
Links
- 238000002604 ultrasonography Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 11
- 238000004611 spectroscopical analysis Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 9
- 230000004044 response Effects 0.000 claims abstract description 53
- 238000012512 characterization method Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 28
- 238000009826 distribution Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 12
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 claims description 19
- 238000012360 testing method Methods 0.000 claims description 5
- 238000005315 distribution function Methods 0.000 claims 1
- 238000001228 spectrum Methods 0.000 abstract description 12
- 238000001514 detection method Methods 0.000 abstract 1
- 230000005284 excitation Effects 0.000 abstract 1
- 230000008878 coupling Effects 0.000 description 3
- 238000010168 coupling process Methods 0.000 description 3
- 238000005859 coupling reaction Methods 0.000 description 3
- 230000035945 sensitivity Effects 0.000 description 3
- 238000004458 analytical method Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000001419 dependent effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000010586 diagram Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000007689 inspection Methods 0.000 description 2
- 239000000463 material Substances 0.000 description 2
- 238000012986 modification Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000004048 modification Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000003908 quality control method Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000005540 biological transmission Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000000052 comparative effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000002789 length control Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000004519 manufacturing process Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000005259 measurement Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000002184 metal Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000000203 mixture Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000000704 physical effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000008569 process Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000012545 processing Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000007787 solid Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000011343 solid material Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000012795 verification Methods 0.000 description 1
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01N—INVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
- G01N29/00—Investigating or analysing materials by the use of ultrasonic, sonic or infrasonic waves; Visualisation of the interior of objects by transmitting ultrasonic or sonic waves through the object
- G01N29/04—Analysing solids
- G01N29/12—Analysing solids by measuring frequency or resonance of acoustic waves
Abstract
ABSTRACT
A resonant ultrasound spectroscopy method provides a unique characterization of an object (10) for use in distinguishing similar objects having physical differences greater than a predetermined tolerance. A resonant response spectrum is obtained for a reference object by placing excitation (14) and detection (16) transducers at any accessible location on the object. The spectrum is analyzed to determine the number of resonant response peaks in a predetermined frequency interval. The distribution of the resonance frequencies is than characterized in a manner effective to form a unique signature of the object. In one characterization, a small frequency interval is defined and stepped through the spectrum frequency range. Subsequent objects are similarly characterized where the characterizations serve as signatures effective to distinguish objects that differ from the reference object by more than the predetermined tolerance.
A resonant ultrasound spectroscopy method provides a unique characterization of an object (10) for use in distinguishing similar objects having physical differences greater than a predetermined tolerance. A resonant response spectrum is obtained for a reference object by placing excitation (14) and detection (16) transducers at any accessible location on the object. The spectrum is analyzed to determine the number of resonant response peaks in a predetermined frequency interval. The distribution of the resonance frequencies is than characterized in a manner effective to form a unique signature of the object. In one characterization, a small frequency interval is defined and stepped through the spectrum frequency range. Subsequent objects are similarly characterized where the characterizations serve as signatures effective to distinguish objects that differ from the reference object by more than the predetermined tolerance.
Description
~tl6~
RESONANT ULTRASOUND SPECTROSCOPY
BACKGRO~ND ~F INVENTION
Ultrasonics has a number of applications to the determination of various material and component characteristics. In one application, the transmission of ultrasonic waves is detected to determine the presence of internal anomalies in a component. In another application, the thickness of a component is determined from the resonant response of a portion of the component located adjacent a transmitter/receiver transducer. These applications generally require transducer access to a flat surface in proximity to a localized volume of the component to be measured. Yet another application invalves modal analysis, where the acoustic resonances of a component are excited and the response amplitudes are measured to predict component failure. All these applications depend on the amplitude of a detected response, whic~, in turn, may depend on the temperature, the exact location of the transducer, acoustic coupling, and other variables.
Resonant ultrasound spectroscopy has been used to determine various properties of solid materials, particularly elastic constants. This application is discussed in U.S. Patent Application S.N. ~06,007, Resonant V 9 '~
Ultrasound Spectrometer, incorporated herein by reference.
The resonant response spectrum of small parallelepiped specimens is determined for use in computing the material elastic constants.
05 It would be desirable to provide an ultrasonic inspection method that does not require flat surfaces for application of the acoustic wave, that provides reproducible results independent of the location of the transmitter/receive transducers, and is relatively insensitive to temperature, couplin~, and other variables that are difficult to control. These problems are addressed by the present invention and a resonant ultrasound spectrographic technique is presented for uniquely characterizing an object.
Accordingly, it is an object of the present invention to provide a characteristic ultrasonic signature of an object that is not dependent on a particular location of ultrasonic transducers.
It is another object of the present invention to provide an ultrasonic inspection method that does not require flat surfaces for the introduction and reception of an acoustic wave.
One other object is to provide an acoustic signature that is relatively insensitive to uncontrolled variables such as temperature and acoustic coupling.
Additional objects, advantages and novel features of the invention will be set forth in part in the description which follows, and in part will become apparent to those skilled in the art upon examination of the following or may 3~ be learned by practice of the invention. The objects and advantages of the invention may be realized and attained by means of the instrumentalities and ccmbinations particularly pointed out in the appended claims.
206~9~
SUMMARY OF INVENTION
To achie~e the foregoing and other objects, and in accordance with the purposes of the present invention, as embodied and broadly described herein, the method of this 05 invention may comprise characterizing an object by resonant ultrasound spectroscopy. Acoustic waves are applied to an ob~ect and swept over a predetermined frequçncy range. The resonant spectrum of the ob~ect is determined over the predetermined frequency range. The frequency distribution of the resonance response peaks over the frequency range is then characterized to form a unique signature to structurally identify the object.
In one technique,a series of relatively small response intervals are defined within the entire frequency range and the number of resonant response peaks within each interval is determined. The density of the resonant response peaks in each small interval is then determined to form the unique characterization of the object. Other characterizations may utilize a conventional Gaussian curve for weighting the response peak density over the entire frequency range and a simple histogram with windows uniformly distributed over the frequency range.
~RIEF DESCRIPTION OF T~E DRAWINGS
The accompanying drawings, which are incorporated in and form a part of the specification, illustrate the present invention and, together with the description, serve to explain the principles of the invention. In the drawings:
- FIGURE 1 is a schematic diagram in block diagram form of apparatus for performing resonant ultrasound spectroscopy.
FIGURE 2A graphically depicts a resonance spectrum from a first object.
, .
20~097 FIG~RE 2B graphically depicts a stepped interval resonance characterization of the first object calculated from the resonance response shown in FIGuRE 2A.
FIGURE 2C graphically depicts a Gaussian 05 characterization calculated from the resonance response shown in FIGURE 2A.
FIGURE 2D graphically depicts a histogram characterization calculated from the resonance response shown in FIGURE 2A.
FIGURE 3A graphically depicts a resonance spectrum from a second object.
FIGU~E 3B graphically depicts a stepped interval resonance characterization of the second object calculated fro~ the resonance response shown in FIGURE 3B.
FIGURE 3C graphically depicts a resonance characterization calculated from the resonance response shown in FIGURE 3A.
FIGURE 3D graphically depicts a resonance characterization calculated from the resonance response shown in FIGURE 3A.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
Every object, by virtue of its shape, size and physical properties (e.g., elastic moduli, speed of sound, density, etc.) can be made to resonate, i.e., vibrate resonantly, at a multitude of frequencies if its ultrasonic attenuation is low enough. The number of observable resonant frequencies depends upon the geometrical complexlty of the object, its ultrasonic attenuation, and the various modes of vibration possible, e.g., bulk mode, shear mode, torsional mode, 3 etc. Even an object as simple as a metal cube has a large number of observable resonant frequencies. A complex object may possess thousands of resonant frequencies ranging from a few thousand hertz to a few megahertz, for typical objects that might be tested.
20~9~9"~
These resonant frequencies provide an acoustic signature of a given object that can be formed into a unique characterization of the object and is not dependent on amplitude of the response or subject to the many OS variables that affect the amplitude. A resolution can be selected to enable the characterization to serve as a signature for o~ject selection or a quality control measure. The signature serves to compare two objects, including their internal compositions, within selected tolerance levels, thereby enabling the presence of small differences or flaws to be detected, even though not spatially located.
Referring now to Figure l, there is shown a resonant ultrasound spectrometry system according to the present invention. A test object 10 is located within a transducer assembly 12 with a transmit transducer 14 and a receive transducer 16 contacting object 10. In accordance with the present invention, the locations of transducers 14 and 16 on object 10 are not critical, although transducers 14 and 16 should be similarly located on similar objects in order to provide best comparative results. The locating surfaces on object 10 are not required to be flat and only a mechanical point contact is adequate for the present technique. Likewise, there is no requirement to optimize acoustic coupling between a transducer and a surface of object lO.
Frequency sweep generator 18 outputs a signal to transmit transducer 14 that is effective for exciting object 10 with acoustic waves having a frequency that is 3C swept over a predetermined frequency range. The frequency range is preferably selected to yield resonant responses that are independent of the environment, e.g. the mounting structure supporting object 10, ground vibrations, etc., and to contain a large number of resonances from object 10. The size and physical features of object 10 determine the frequency range and the required accuracy for the measurements. Typically, if the physical difference oS between a reference object and an object under test is at least 1%, the difference should be detectable. Also, considering that the speed of sound in solids is typically within a factor of two of 4 kM/s, a 1 mm feature would require megahertz frequencies, while a 1 meter feature would require frequencies near 1 kHz. The response of object 10 is detected by transducer 16, amplified by amplifier 22 and provided to detector 24. A suitable detector is described in U.S. Patent Application S.N.
406,007, referenced above, although many other detectors are available. The response is converted to digital form by A/D converter 26 for further processing.
Computer 28 communicates with frequency sweep generator 18 and A/D converter 26 along bus 32, an IEEE 488 bus.
Computer 28 controls the sweep rate of generator 18 and receives frequency data to correlate with response data from A/D converter 26. Computer 28 further performs the resonant peak analysis according to the present invention to form a unique characterization of object 10 with a selected sensitivity. Any of a number of available software routines may be used to identify the frequencies of the resonance peaks.
The object characterization of the present invention is formed by first determining the frequency of each resonant response peak along the entire frequency range of 3~ interest. The distribution of the resonant response frequencies is then characterized to form a unique acoustic signature for the object. In one method of forming the signature, a rèlatively small response interval is defined for stepping over the overall frequency range. The number ,.,..~1 7 2~69097 of resonant response peaks is then determined over each of the relatively small response intervals. The number of resonant peaks in the small interval at each step is plotted as a function of frequency to form one unique 05 object characterization.
Define a function Fi such that Fi = at frequency fi for no resonance;
Fi = 1 at frequency fi if a resonance is present, where fl< fi~fN, the frequency range over which the resonant frequencies were determined along N data points.
The signature plot for a stepped interval si~nature is then ~=i+k ~ where k is the step interval width.
Other distributions of the resonant frequencies may be selected to form a unique characterization with different sensitivities to differences between components. A
Gaussian function may be used over the entire interval as a weighting function that slides across the resonance spectrum. The Gaussian signature plot becomes _(fi-f,)2 Si = ~ Fje ~f , where ~f is a selected window width j=l Likewise, a simple histogram may be formed, with a histogram signature plot formed as 3 iM
Si = ~ F. , where M is the window width and (i-l)M+l ] i runs from 1 to the number of windows.
. ., .j It will be appreciated that the subject characterizations are a function only of the frequency and not the amplitude of the resonant response peaks.
8y way of example, assume an appropriate frequency o5 range is chosen from 200 kHz to 400 kHz and the sweep generator is stepped at intervals of 100 Hz over this range. The response of the object is recorded at each step to generate a resonant response spectrum. This total response is then reduced to a characterization that is relatively insensitive to uncontrolled variables, such as temperature, and that has a variable selectivity determined by the width selected for the small response interval.
For a stepped interval characterization, a relatively small response interval is selected, e.g., 2000 Hz, and is lS incremented along the entire frequency range in steps corresponding to the sweep steps. The number of resonant response peaks is then calculated within the small response interval at each step. In this example, one counting interval would be between 200 kHz and 202 ~Hz, another zO interval between 200.1 kHz and 202.1 kHz, etc. A total of 1980 peak densities would be obtained corresponding to each of the interval steps. The distribution of resonant peak densities as a function of frequency then forms the unique object signature according to the present invention.
Figures 2A, 2B, 2C, 2D, 3A, 3B, 3C, and 3D illustrate the characterizations discussed above and demonstrate the ability to differentiate an object containing a difference from a reference object. In each case, a basic bras plate was provided with dimensions of 5xlO cm and 1.5 mm thickness and an edge slot 1 mm wide x ~ mm deep. The only distinction was that the edge slots were at locations that differed by 2 mm. Figures 2A and 3A are the resonant response spectra for the two different pieces.
9 2069~97 Figures 2B and 3~ are the corresponding stepped interval characteristic resonance density plots. The entire frequency range of 350 kHz was swept by the exciting signal to generate the resonant spectra shown in Figures 2A
05 and 3A. A second interval of 2 kHz was then stepped through the entire frequency range in O.l kHz steps to obtain the numbers of resonant response peaks in each second interval. These numbers of resonant response peaks form a unique characterization of the object and can be formulated as a density (number of peaks/step) or a percentage relative to the resonant peaks in the entire sweep frequency range. The distinction between the two characteristic curves 2B and 3B is readily apparent and, in this example, can be recognized manually or through a computer comparison scheme.
The selectivity of the above characterization can be varied by adjusting the width of the small response interval and the length of the step through the total frequency range. It is readily apparent that the response interval and step length control the density distribution characterization to enhance or obscure the effect of - various resonance peak distributions.
As hereinabove discussed, other unique signatures can be formed using Gaussian characterizations and histogram characterizations. Figures 2C and 3C illustrate Gaussian signatures for the frequency spectra shown in Figures 2A
and 3A, respectively. The selected window width ~f was 2 kHz. Figures 2D and 3D illustrate histogram signatures using a window width of 30 kHz It is again readily apparent that the sample edge slot relocation of 2 mm produced easily discernible distinctions in both the Gaussian and histogram signatures.
The sensitivity of the above method can also be adjusted by selecting the frequency range over which the resonance density is determined or by adjusting the sweep rate. An increasing sweep rate causes the width of sharp resonances to be increased, obscuring adjacent resonances ~5 and increasing the tolerance level of the method. Thus, two objects would be differentiated only when a test object exceeds selected tolerance levels with the reference object. It should be noted that the above technique does not determine the nature or location of the detected anomaly.
While the resonant ultrasound spectroscopy method has obvious application to various manufacturing quality control processes, it also has significant application to arms treaty-verification methods. For example, the method has easily differentiated between full and empty shell casings and may be able to verify the number of warheads inside a rocket or bomb shell.
The foregoing description of embodiments of the invention has been presented for purposes of illustration and de0cription. It is not intended to be exhaustive or to limit the invention to the precise form disclosed, and obviously many modifications and variations are possible in light of the above teaching. The embodiments were chosen and described in order to best explain the principles of the invention and its practical application to thereby -~ enable others skilled in the art to best utilize the invention in various embodiments and with various modifications as are suited to the particular use contemplated. It is intended that the scope of the 3G invention be defined by the claims appended hereto.
.. I
RESONANT ULTRASOUND SPECTROSCOPY
BACKGRO~ND ~F INVENTION
Ultrasonics has a number of applications to the determination of various material and component characteristics. In one application, the transmission of ultrasonic waves is detected to determine the presence of internal anomalies in a component. In another application, the thickness of a component is determined from the resonant response of a portion of the component located adjacent a transmitter/receiver transducer. These applications generally require transducer access to a flat surface in proximity to a localized volume of the component to be measured. Yet another application invalves modal analysis, where the acoustic resonances of a component are excited and the response amplitudes are measured to predict component failure. All these applications depend on the amplitude of a detected response, whic~, in turn, may depend on the temperature, the exact location of the transducer, acoustic coupling, and other variables.
Resonant ultrasound spectroscopy has been used to determine various properties of solid materials, particularly elastic constants. This application is discussed in U.S. Patent Application S.N. ~06,007, Resonant V 9 '~
Ultrasound Spectrometer, incorporated herein by reference.
The resonant response spectrum of small parallelepiped specimens is determined for use in computing the material elastic constants.
05 It would be desirable to provide an ultrasonic inspection method that does not require flat surfaces for application of the acoustic wave, that provides reproducible results independent of the location of the transmitter/receive transducers, and is relatively insensitive to temperature, couplin~, and other variables that are difficult to control. These problems are addressed by the present invention and a resonant ultrasound spectrographic technique is presented for uniquely characterizing an object.
Accordingly, it is an object of the present invention to provide a characteristic ultrasonic signature of an object that is not dependent on a particular location of ultrasonic transducers.
It is another object of the present invention to provide an ultrasonic inspection method that does not require flat surfaces for the introduction and reception of an acoustic wave.
One other object is to provide an acoustic signature that is relatively insensitive to uncontrolled variables such as temperature and acoustic coupling.
Additional objects, advantages and novel features of the invention will be set forth in part in the description which follows, and in part will become apparent to those skilled in the art upon examination of the following or may 3~ be learned by practice of the invention. The objects and advantages of the invention may be realized and attained by means of the instrumentalities and ccmbinations particularly pointed out in the appended claims.
206~9~
SUMMARY OF INVENTION
To achie~e the foregoing and other objects, and in accordance with the purposes of the present invention, as embodied and broadly described herein, the method of this 05 invention may comprise characterizing an object by resonant ultrasound spectroscopy. Acoustic waves are applied to an ob~ect and swept over a predetermined frequçncy range. The resonant spectrum of the ob~ect is determined over the predetermined frequency range. The frequency distribution of the resonance response peaks over the frequency range is then characterized to form a unique signature to structurally identify the object.
In one technique,a series of relatively small response intervals are defined within the entire frequency range and the number of resonant response peaks within each interval is determined. The density of the resonant response peaks in each small interval is then determined to form the unique characterization of the object. Other characterizations may utilize a conventional Gaussian curve for weighting the response peak density over the entire frequency range and a simple histogram with windows uniformly distributed over the frequency range.
~RIEF DESCRIPTION OF T~E DRAWINGS
The accompanying drawings, which are incorporated in and form a part of the specification, illustrate the present invention and, together with the description, serve to explain the principles of the invention. In the drawings:
- FIGURE 1 is a schematic diagram in block diagram form of apparatus for performing resonant ultrasound spectroscopy.
FIGURE 2A graphically depicts a resonance spectrum from a first object.
, .
20~097 FIG~RE 2B graphically depicts a stepped interval resonance characterization of the first object calculated from the resonance response shown in FIGuRE 2A.
FIGURE 2C graphically depicts a Gaussian 05 characterization calculated from the resonance response shown in FIGURE 2A.
FIGURE 2D graphically depicts a histogram characterization calculated from the resonance response shown in FIGURE 2A.
FIGURE 3A graphically depicts a resonance spectrum from a second object.
FIGU~E 3B graphically depicts a stepped interval resonance characterization of the second object calculated fro~ the resonance response shown in FIGURE 3B.
FIGURE 3C graphically depicts a resonance characterization calculated from the resonance response shown in FIGURE 3A.
FIGURE 3D graphically depicts a resonance characterization calculated from the resonance response shown in FIGURE 3A.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
Every object, by virtue of its shape, size and physical properties (e.g., elastic moduli, speed of sound, density, etc.) can be made to resonate, i.e., vibrate resonantly, at a multitude of frequencies if its ultrasonic attenuation is low enough. The number of observable resonant frequencies depends upon the geometrical complexlty of the object, its ultrasonic attenuation, and the various modes of vibration possible, e.g., bulk mode, shear mode, torsional mode, 3 etc. Even an object as simple as a metal cube has a large number of observable resonant frequencies. A complex object may possess thousands of resonant frequencies ranging from a few thousand hertz to a few megahertz, for typical objects that might be tested.
20~9~9"~
These resonant frequencies provide an acoustic signature of a given object that can be formed into a unique characterization of the object and is not dependent on amplitude of the response or subject to the many OS variables that affect the amplitude. A resolution can be selected to enable the characterization to serve as a signature for o~ject selection or a quality control measure. The signature serves to compare two objects, including their internal compositions, within selected tolerance levels, thereby enabling the presence of small differences or flaws to be detected, even though not spatially located.
Referring now to Figure l, there is shown a resonant ultrasound spectrometry system according to the present invention. A test object 10 is located within a transducer assembly 12 with a transmit transducer 14 and a receive transducer 16 contacting object 10. In accordance with the present invention, the locations of transducers 14 and 16 on object 10 are not critical, although transducers 14 and 16 should be similarly located on similar objects in order to provide best comparative results. The locating surfaces on object 10 are not required to be flat and only a mechanical point contact is adequate for the present technique. Likewise, there is no requirement to optimize acoustic coupling between a transducer and a surface of object lO.
Frequency sweep generator 18 outputs a signal to transmit transducer 14 that is effective for exciting object 10 with acoustic waves having a frequency that is 3C swept over a predetermined frequency range. The frequency range is preferably selected to yield resonant responses that are independent of the environment, e.g. the mounting structure supporting object 10, ground vibrations, etc., and to contain a large number of resonances from object 10. The size and physical features of object 10 determine the frequency range and the required accuracy for the measurements. Typically, if the physical difference oS between a reference object and an object under test is at least 1%, the difference should be detectable. Also, considering that the speed of sound in solids is typically within a factor of two of 4 kM/s, a 1 mm feature would require megahertz frequencies, while a 1 meter feature would require frequencies near 1 kHz. The response of object 10 is detected by transducer 16, amplified by amplifier 22 and provided to detector 24. A suitable detector is described in U.S. Patent Application S.N.
406,007, referenced above, although many other detectors are available. The response is converted to digital form by A/D converter 26 for further processing.
Computer 28 communicates with frequency sweep generator 18 and A/D converter 26 along bus 32, an IEEE 488 bus.
Computer 28 controls the sweep rate of generator 18 and receives frequency data to correlate with response data from A/D converter 26. Computer 28 further performs the resonant peak analysis according to the present invention to form a unique characterization of object 10 with a selected sensitivity. Any of a number of available software routines may be used to identify the frequencies of the resonance peaks.
The object characterization of the present invention is formed by first determining the frequency of each resonant response peak along the entire frequency range of 3~ interest. The distribution of the resonant response frequencies is then characterized to form a unique acoustic signature for the object. In one method of forming the signature, a rèlatively small response interval is defined for stepping over the overall frequency range. The number ,.,..~1 7 2~69097 of resonant response peaks is then determined over each of the relatively small response intervals. The number of resonant peaks in the small interval at each step is plotted as a function of frequency to form one unique 05 object characterization.
Define a function Fi such that Fi = at frequency fi for no resonance;
Fi = 1 at frequency fi if a resonance is present, where fl< fi~fN, the frequency range over which the resonant frequencies were determined along N data points.
The signature plot for a stepped interval si~nature is then ~=i+k ~ where k is the step interval width.
Other distributions of the resonant frequencies may be selected to form a unique characterization with different sensitivities to differences between components. A
Gaussian function may be used over the entire interval as a weighting function that slides across the resonance spectrum. The Gaussian signature plot becomes _(fi-f,)2 Si = ~ Fje ~f , where ~f is a selected window width j=l Likewise, a simple histogram may be formed, with a histogram signature plot formed as 3 iM
Si = ~ F. , where M is the window width and (i-l)M+l ] i runs from 1 to the number of windows.
. ., .j It will be appreciated that the subject characterizations are a function only of the frequency and not the amplitude of the resonant response peaks.
8y way of example, assume an appropriate frequency o5 range is chosen from 200 kHz to 400 kHz and the sweep generator is stepped at intervals of 100 Hz over this range. The response of the object is recorded at each step to generate a resonant response spectrum. This total response is then reduced to a characterization that is relatively insensitive to uncontrolled variables, such as temperature, and that has a variable selectivity determined by the width selected for the small response interval.
For a stepped interval characterization, a relatively small response interval is selected, e.g., 2000 Hz, and is lS incremented along the entire frequency range in steps corresponding to the sweep steps. The number of resonant response peaks is then calculated within the small response interval at each step. In this example, one counting interval would be between 200 kHz and 202 ~Hz, another zO interval between 200.1 kHz and 202.1 kHz, etc. A total of 1980 peak densities would be obtained corresponding to each of the interval steps. The distribution of resonant peak densities as a function of frequency then forms the unique object signature according to the present invention.
Figures 2A, 2B, 2C, 2D, 3A, 3B, 3C, and 3D illustrate the characterizations discussed above and demonstrate the ability to differentiate an object containing a difference from a reference object. In each case, a basic bras plate was provided with dimensions of 5xlO cm and 1.5 mm thickness and an edge slot 1 mm wide x ~ mm deep. The only distinction was that the edge slots were at locations that differed by 2 mm. Figures 2A and 3A are the resonant response spectra for the two different pieces.
9 2069~97 Figures 2B and 3~ are the corresponding stepped interval characteristic resonance density plots. The entire frequency range of 350 kHz was swept by the exciting signal to generate the resonant spectra shown in Figures 2A
05 and 3A. A second interval of 2 kHz was then stepped through the entire frequency range in O.l kHz steps to obtain the numbers of resonant response peaks in each second interval. These numbers of resonant response peaks form a unique characterization of the object and can be formulated as a density (number of peaks/step) or a percentage relative to the resonant peaks in the entire sweep frequency range. The distinction between the two characteristic curves 2B and 3B is readily apparent and, in this example, can be recognized manually or through a computer comparison scheme.
The selectivity of the above characterization can be varied by adjusting the width of the small response interval and the length of the step through the total frequency range. It is readily apparent that the response interval and step length control the density distribution characterization to enhance or obscure the effect of - various resonance peak distributions.
As hereinabove discussed, other unique signatures can be formed using Gaussian characterizations and histogram characterizations. Figures 2C and 3C illustrate Gaussian signatures for the frequency spectra shown in Figures 2A
and 3A, respectively. The selected window width ~f was 2 kHz. Figures 2D and 3D illustrate histogram signatures using a window width of 30 kHz It is again readily apparent that the sample edge slot relocation of 2 mm produced easily discernible distinctions in both the Gaussian and histogram signatures.
The sensitivity of the above method can also be adjusted by selecting the frequency range over which the resonance density is determined or by adjusting the sweep rate. An increasing sweep rate causes the width of sharp resonances to be increased, obscuring adjacent resonances ~5 and increasing the tolerance level of the method. Thus, two objects would be differentiated only when a test object exceeds selected tolerance levels with the reference object. It should be noted that the above technique does not determine the nature or location of the detected anomaly.
While the resonant ultrasound spectroscopy method has obvious application to various manufacturing quality control processes, it also has significant application to arms treaty-verification methods. For example, the method has easily differentiated between full and empty shell casings and may be able to verify the number of warheads inside a rocket or bomb shell.
The foregoing description of embodiments of the invention has been presented for purposes of illustration and de0cription. It is not intended to be exhaustive or to limit the invention to the precise form disclosed, and obviously many modifications and variations are possible in light of the above teaching. The embodiments were chosen and described in order to best explain the principles of the invention and its practical application to thereby -~ enable others skilled in the art to best utilize the invention in various embodiments and with various modifications as are suited to the particular use contemplated. It is intended that the scope of the 3G invention be defined by the claims appended hereto.
.. I
Claims (6)
1. A method for characterizing an object by resonant ultrasound spectroscopy, comprising the steps of:
applying to said object acoustic waves having frequencies swept over a predetermined frequency range;
detecting a response of said object to said acoustic waves;
determining the frequency of each resonant response peak in said predetermined frequency range; and forming a unique signature of said object from a density distribution of said resonant response frequencies.
applying to said object acoustic waves having frequencies swept over a predetermined frequency range;
detecting a response of said object to said acoustic waves;
determining the frequency of each resonant response peak in said predetermined frequency range; and forming a unique signature of said object from a density distribution of said resonant response frequencies.
2. A method according to Claim 1, wherein characterizing said distribution of said resonant response frequencies includes the steps of:
defining a small response interval;
stepping said small response interval through said predetermined frequency range at a selected step interval;
and determining a number of resonant response peaks within said small response interval at each step to form said unique signature of said object.
defining a small response interval;
stepping said small response interval through said predetermined frequency range at a selected step interval;
and determining a number of resonant response peaks within said small response interval at each step to form said unique signature of said object.
3. A method according to Claim 2, wherein said small response interval and said step interval are selected to obtain a selectivity for said characterization of said object.
4. A method according to Claim 1, wherein characterizing said distribution of said resonant response frequencies includes the steps of:
defining a plurality of frequency steps over said predetermined frequency range; and applying a Gaussian weighted distribution function centered at each frequency step to determine the resonant frequency characterization at said each frequency step.
defining a plurality of frequency steps over said predetermined frequency range; and applying a Gaussian weighted distribution function centered at each frequency step to determine the resonant frequency characterization at said each frequency step.
5. A method according to Claim 1, wherein characterizing said distribution of said resonant response frequencies includes the steps of:
defining a plurality of discrete window intervals over said predetermined frequency range; and determining the number of said resonant response frequencies within each said discrete window interval.
defining a plurality of discrete window intervals over said predetermined frequency range; and determining the number of said resonant response frequencies within each said discrete window interval.
6. A method according to Claims 1, 2, 4, or 5 further including the steps of:
forming a first unique signature of a reference object;
forming a second unique signature of a test object;
comparing said first and second signature to determine whether said test object is similar to said reference object within a tolerance determined by said step of forming a unique signature of said object from a density distribution of said resonant response frequencies.
forming a first unique signature of a reference object;
forming a second unique signature of a test object;
comparing said first and second signature to determine whether said test object is similar to said reference object within a tolerance determined by said step of forming a unique signature of said object from a density distribution of said resonant response frequencies.
Applications Claiming Priority (3)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| US585,557 | 1990-09-20 | ||
| US07/585,557 US5062296A (en) | 1990-09-20 | 1990-09-20 | Resonant ultrasound spectroscopy |
| PCT/US1991/006703 WO1992005439A1 (en) | 1990-09-20 | 1991-09-19 | Resonant ultrasound spectroscopy |
Publications (1)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| CA2069097A1 true CA2069097A1 (en) | 1992-03-21 |
Family
ID=24341965
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| CA002069097A Abandoned CA2069097A1 (en) | 1990-09-20 | 1991-09-19 | Resonant ultrasound spectroscopy |
Country Status (5)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| US (1) | US5062296A (en) |
| JP (1) | JPH05504840A (en) |
| CA (1) | CA2069097A1 (en) |
| DE (1) | DE4192220T1 (en) |
| WO (1) | WO1992005439A1 (en) |
Families Citing this family (59)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US5520061A (en) * | 1989-03-14 | 1996-05-28 | Enprotech Corporation | Multiple axis transducer mounting collar |
| JPH03289561A (en) * | 1990-04-06 | 1991-12-19 | Iwatsu Electric Co Ltd | Method and apparatus for detecting defect and part of different hardness |
| US5351543A (en) * | 1991-12-27 | 1994-10-04 | The Regents Of The University Of California, Office Of Technology Transfer | Crack detection using resonant ultrasound spectroscopy |
| US5257544A (en) * | 1992-01-22 | 1993-11-02 | The Board Of Trustees Of The Leland Stanford Junior University | Resonant frequency method for bearing ball inspection |
| WO1993017318A1 (en) * | 1992-02-27 | 1993-09-02 | United States Department Of Energy | Apparatus and method for noninvasive characterization of eggs |
| US5355731A (en) * | 1992-05-08 | 1994-10-18 | The Regents Of The University Of California, Office Of Technology Transfer | Sphericity determination using resonant ultrasound spectroscopy |
| US5359541A (en) * | 1993-03-01 | 1994-10-25 | The Regents Of The University Of California, Office Of Technology Transfer | Fluid density and concentration measurement using noninvasive in situ ultrasonic resonance interferometry |
| US5811680A (en) * | 1993-06-13 | 1998-09-22 | Technion Research & Development Foundation Ltd. | Method and apparatus for testing the quality of fruit |
| US5425272A (en) * | 1993-11-30 | 1995-06-20 | Quatro Corporation | Relative resonant frequency shifts to detect cracks |
| US5606130A (en) * | 1994-03-25 | 1997-02-25 | The Regents Of The University Of California | Method for determining the octane rating of gasoline samples by observing corresponding acoustic resonances therein |
| US5886262A (en) * | 1994-03-25 | 1999-03-23 | The Regents Of The University Of California | Apparatus and method for comparing corresponding acoustic resonances in liquids |
| US5591913A (en) * | 1994-05-12 | 1997-01-07 | Southern Research Institute | Apparatus and method for ultrasonic spectroscopy testing of materials |
| NL9401388A (en) * | 1994-08-26 | 1996-04-01 | Leuven K U Res & Dev | Device for checking eggs |
| US5837896A (en) * | 1995-08-23 | 1998-11-17 | Quasar International | Detection of defects using resonant ultrasound spectroscopy at predicted high order modes |
| US5641905A (en) * | 1995-12-14 | 1997-06-24 | Quatro Corporation | Second derivative resonant ultrasound response analyzer |
| DE19650660A1 (en) * | 1996-12-06 | 1998-06-10 | Burkhardt Dr Suthoff | Process and assembly oscillate esp. artillery shells and compare resultant oscillation |
| DE19712689A1 (en) * | 1997-03-26 | 1998-10-01 | Heidelberger Druckmasch Ag | Method of regulating paper tension in offset printing machine |
| US5952576A (en) * | 1997-03-27 | 1999-09-14 | Quasar International | Concurrent RUS measurements using multiple frequencies |
| US6199431B1 (en) | 1997-03-27 | 2001-03-13 | Quasar International, Inc. | Method of resonant life cycle comparison inspection by serial number |
| CA2208499A1 (en) | 1997-06-16 | 1998-12-16 | Hydro-Quebec | Electrically audible motorized wheel assembly and method thereof |
| US6023975A (en) * | 1998-04-27 | 2000-02-15 | Willis; Frank A. | Method for rapid data acquisition in resonant ultrasound spectroscopy |
| US6507790B1 (en) * | 1998-07-15 | 2003-01-14 | Horton, Inc. | Acoustic monitor |
| US5965817A (en) * | 1998-07-28 | 1999-10-12 | Quasar International, Inc. | Temperature compensation of resonant frequency measurements for the effects of temperature variations |
| US6330827B1 (en) * | 1998-12-04 | 2001-12-18 | The Regents Of The University Of California | Resonant nonlinear ultrasound spectroscopy |
| DE19908620C1 (en) * | 1999-02-27 | 2000-11-30 | Degussa | Device and method for checking the authenticity of shaped metal articles |
| AU2002222955A1 (en) | 2000-07-14 | 2002-01-30 | Lockheed Martin Corporation | A system and method of determining porosity in composite materials using ultrasound |
| US6439053B1 (en) * | 2000-09-13 | 2002-08-27 | Henry Alan Bobulski | Acoustic spectrometer apparatus and method for cavity geometry verification |
| US6339960B1 (en) | 2000-10-30 | 2002-01-22 | Mississippi State University | Non-intrusive pressure and level sensor for sealed containers |
| US6951133B2 (en) * | 2000-11-15 | 2005-10-04 | Passarelli Jr Frank | Electromagnetic acoustic transducer with recessed coils |
| US6561035B2 (en) | 2000-11-15 | 2003-05-13 | Frank Passarelli, Jr. | Electromagnetic acoustic transducer with recessed coils |
| US20030200932A1 (en) | 2001-02-16 | 2003-10-30 | Toelken L. Taizo | Ultrasound quality inspection of avian eggs |
| US7354401B1 (en) | 2002-06-19 | 2008-04-08 | Toelken L Taizo | Ultrasound sex determination for sorting of avian hatchlings |
| US6724689B2 (en) | 2002-03-08 | 2004-04-20 | Philip Koenig | Personal identification method and apparatus using acoustic resonance analysis of body parts |
| US6644119B1 (en) * | 2002-06-28 | 2003-11-11 | The Regents Of The University Of California | Noninvasive characterization of a flowing multiphase fluid using ultrasonic interferometry |
| DE10230547B4 (en) * | 2002-07-05 | 2004-07-01 | Drallmesstechnik Tippelmann Gmbh | Method and device for testing a hollow body |
| DE10248511A1 (en) * | 2002-10-17 | 2004-04-29 | BSH Bosch und Siemens Hausgeräte GmbH | Quality control procedures |
| DE60320315T2 (en) * | 2003-02-17 | 2009-06-25 | Pp-Technologies Ag | DEVICE FOR MEASURING PRINTING PROFILES |
| US8043217B1 (en) * | 2007-07-10 | 2011-10-25 | Bioquantetics, Inc. | Method and apparatus to quantify specific material properties of objects using real-time ultrasound burst spectrography technique |
| US7779691B2 (en) * | 2007-10-15 | 2010-08-24 | United Technologies Corporation | Acoustic method and apparatus for fracture detection of ball bearings |
| EP2169424A1 (en) | 2008-09-03 | 2010-03-31 | Esaote S.p.A. | Method and device for determining local characteristics of an object, particularly with ultrasounds |
| US8051715B2 (en) | 2009-02-25 | 2011-11-08 | The Boeing Company | Resonant inspection using reconfigurable nest |
| CN102725631B (en) * | 2009-11-19 | 2015-12-16 | 伊利诺斯工具制品有限公司 | Improve the cluster analysis system and method for classification performance |
| EP2366997B1 (en) | 2010-03-17 | 2012-07-18 | Esaote S.p.A. | Method and device for determining the structural organization of an object with ultrasounds |
| US20120090394A1 (en) * | 2010-10-15 | 2012-04-19 | Soliman Abdalla | System and method for acoustic characterization of solid materials |
| US10481104B2 (en) * | 2010-10-21 | 2019-11-19 | Vibrant Corporation | Utilizing resonance inspection of in-service parts |
| RU2477854C2 (en) * | 2011-06-22 | 2013-03-20 | Общество с ограниченной ответственностью "Газпром трансгаз Махачкала" | Method of inspecting materials by resonant ultrasound spectroscopy |
| US8903675B2 (en) * | 2011-10-14 | 2014-12-02 | Vibrant Corporation | Acoustic systems and methods for nondestructive testing of a part through frequency sweeps |
| US9228981B2 (en) | 2011-11-17 | 2016-01-05 | Vibrant Corporation | Resonance inspection-based surface defect system/method |
| US9389205B2 (en) | 2012-05-23 | 2016-07-12 | International Electronic Machines Corp. | Resonant signal analysis-based inspection of rail components |
| US9310340B2 (en) | 2012-05-23 | 2016-04-12 | International Electronic Machines Corp. | Resonant signal analysis-based inspection of rail components |
| WO2014197077A1 (en) * | 2013-03-15 | 2014-12-11 | Vibrant Corporation | Saw mode-based surface defect system/method |
| US9304112B2 (en) * | 2013-04-05 | 2016-04-05 | George Wyatt Rhodes | Method for detecting the purity of gold bullion |
| US10444202B2 (en) | 2014-04-16 | 2019-10-15 | Triad National Security, Llc | Nondestructive inspection using continuous ultrasonic wave generation |
| GB2545704A (en) | 2015-12-22 | 2017-06-28 | Univ Sheffield | Continuous wave ultrasound for analysis of a surface |
| US10794836B1 (en) | 2016-12-27 | 2020-10-06 | Triad National Security, Llc | System and method for in-process inspection within advanced manufacturing processes |
| US10386337B2 (en) * | 2017-02-28 | 2019-08-20 | Gemological Institute Of America, Inc. (Gia) | Method for fingerprinting and sorting diamonds |
| GR20170100590A (en) * | 2017-12-28 | 2019-07-08 | Τεχνολογικο Εκπαιδευτικο Ιδρυμα Ανατολικης Μακεδονιας Και Θρακης | Materials real-time integrity assesment and quality assurance (martian-qa) |
| WO2021030793A2 (en) | 2019-08-15 | 2021-02-18 | Massachusetts Institute Of Technology | Rhinometric sensing and gas detection |
| WO2022272059A1 (en) * | 2021-06-24 | 2022-12-29 | Triad National Security, Llc | Method and system of moisture content detection |
Family Cites Families (11)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US2393225A (en) * | 1942-10-23 | 1946-01-22 | C E Hovey | Flaw detecting method |
| US2909059A (en) * | 1956-05-25 | 1959-10-20 | California Inst Res Found | Means for detecting resonance vibration |
| US3043132A (en) * | 1958-10-16 | 1962-07-10 | Gen Motors Corp | Sonic tester |
| US3948345A (en) * | 1973-06-15 | 1976-04-06 | Allan Rosencwaig | Methods and means for analyzing substances |
| US4285241A (en) * | 1979-07-13 | 1981-08-25 | Westinghouse Electric Corp. | Method and apparatus for the determination of the mass of an impacting object |
| US4428235A (en) * | 1980-06-20 | 1984-01-31 | Hitachi, Ltd. | Non-destructive inspection by frequency spectrum resolution |
| JPS5840367A (en) * | 1981-08-26 | 1983-03-09 | 日本ペイント株式会社 | Water paint composition and its preparation |
| US4704905A (en) * | 1984-10-09 | 1987-11-10 | Photoacoustic Technology, Inc. | Automation control apparatus |
| US4581935A (en) * | 1984-12-27 | 1986-04-15 | University Of Tennessee Research Corporation | Method and apparatus for grading fibers |
| DE3515061A1 (en) * | 1985-04-26 | 1986-10-30 | Fried. Krupp Gmbh, 4300 Essen | METHOD AND DEVICE FOR MONITORING MACHINE PARTS |
| FR2592481B1 (en) * | 1985-12-27 | 1988-02-12 | Jacob Michel | FAULT CONTROL APPARATUS, PARTICULARLY IN FOUNDRY PARTS, AND METHOD FOR IMPLEMENTING SAME. |
-
1990
- 1990-09-20 US US07/585,557 patent/US5062296A/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
-
1991
- 1991-09-19 WO PCT/US1991/006703 patent/WO1992005439A1/en active Application Filing
- 1991-09-19 DE DE4192220T patent/DE4192220T1/en not_active Withdrawn
- 1991-09-19 JP JP3517547A patent/JPH05504840A/en active Pending
- 1991-09-19 CA CA002069097A patent/CA2069097A1/en not_active Abandoned
Also Published As
| Publication number | Publication date |
|---|---|
| US5062296A (en) | 1991-11-05 |
| DE4192220T1 (en) | 1996-11-21 |
| JPH05504840A (en) | 1993-07-22 |
| WO1992005439A1 (en) | 1992-04-02 |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| US5062296A (en) | Resonant ultrasound spectroscopy | |
| US5425272A (en) | Relative resonant frequency shifts to detect cracks | |
| US6366232B1 (en) | Method and sensor for detecting foreign bodies in a medium with a radar | |
| US7047809B2 (en) | Ultrasonic monitor of material composition and particle size | |
| US5767407A (en) | Noninvasive identification of fluids by swept-frequency acoustic interferometry | |
| US20040054474A1 (en) | Acoustic method for estimating mechanical properties of a material and apparatus therefor | |
| US6653847B2 (en) | Interferometric localization of irregularities | |
| US5408880A (en) | Ultrasonic differential measurement | |
| Honarvar et al. | Nondestructive evaluation of cylindrical components by resonance acoustic spectroscopy | |
| US5146432A (en) | Method for making cement impedance measurements with characterized transducer | |
| EP0485960A2 (en) | Method and apparatus for performing ultrasonic flaw detection | |
| Ferguson et al. | The estimation of wavenumbers in two-dimensional structures | |
| US4790188A (en) | Method of, and an apparatus for, evaluating forming capabilities of solid plate | |
| CA2167813C (en) | Strength determination of sheet materials by ultrasonic testing | |
| SU917711A3 (en) | Method of tuning ultrasonic apparatus | |
| JP2992228B2 (en) | Inundation detector | |
| Karaojiuzt et al. | Defect detection in concrete using split spectrum processing | |
| US4672851A (en) | Acoustic evaluation of thermal insulation | |
| Bilgutay et al. | Spectral analysis of randomly distributed scatterers for ultrasonic grain size estimation | |
| JP2002055092A (en) | Method and apparatus for diagnosing structure | |
| AU9403498A (en) | Nondestructive testing of dielectric materials | |
| Kachanov et al. | Issues of ultrasonic testing of extended complexly structured items with strong attenuation of signals | |
| Alleyne et al. | The measurements and prediction of Lamb wave interaction with defects | |
| Kachanov et al. | The use of complex-modulated signals to increase the accuracy of measurements of the velocity of ultrasound in concrete | |
| JPH09236585A (en) | Diagnostic measurement sensor for surface degradation, hardening, fatigue, etc., and diagnostic device and diagnostic method |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| FZDE | Discontinued |