CA2099972C - Apparatus and method for selective tributary switching in a bidirectional ring transmission system - Google Patents
Apparatus and method for selective tributary switching in a bidirectional ring transmission systemInfo
- Publication number
- CA2099972C CA2099972C CA002099972A CA2099972A CA2099972C CA 2099972 C CA2099972 C CA 2099972C CA 002099972 A CA002099972 A CA 002099972A CA 2099972 A CA2099972 A CA 2099972A CA 2099972 C CA2099972 C CA 2099972C
- Authority
- CA
- Canada
- Prior art keywords
- protection switching
- switch
- ring
- switched
- communications circuit
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Expired - Fee Related
Links
- 230000005540 biological transmission Effects 0.000 title claims abstract description 105
- 230000002457 bidirectional effect Effects 0.000 title claims abstract description 43
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 18
- 238000004891 communication Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 146
- 239000013307 optical fiber Substances 0.000 claims abstract description 77
- 238000012544 monitoring process Methods 0.000 claims description 9
- 230000004044 response Effects 0.000 claims description 4
- 150000002500 ions Chemical class 0.000 description 36
- 239000000835 fiber Substances 0.000 description 11
- 230000003287 optical effect Effects 0.000 description 10
- 238000010586 diagram Methods 0.000 description 7
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 description 7
- 230000008569 process Effects 0.000 description 7
- 230000009471 action Effects 0.000 description 4
- NLZUEZXRPGMBCV-UHFFFAOYSA-N Butylhydroxytoluene Chemical compound CC1=CC(C(C)(C)C)=C(O)C(C(C)(C)C)=C1 NLZUEZXRPGMBCV-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 3
- 244000228957 Ferula foetida Species 0.000 description 2
- 230000036541 health Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000002955 isolation Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000012360 testing method Methods 0.000 description 2
- WHXSMMKQMYFTQS-UHFFFAOYSA-N Lithium Chemical compound [Li] WHXSMMKQMYFTQS-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 101100274524 Mus musculus Clec18a gene Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 241001354782 Nitor Species 0.000 description 1
- 101100478717 Postia placenta (strain ATCC 44394 / Madison 698-R) STS-10 gene Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 230000008901 benefit Effects 0.000 description 1
- 150000001768 cations Chemical class 0.000 description 1
- 238000011160 research Methods 0.000 description 1
Classifications
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
- H04L1/00—Arrangements for detecting or preventing errors in the information received
- H04L1/22—Arrangements for detecting or preventing errors in the information received using redundant apparatus to increase reliability
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04J—MULTIPLEX COMMUNICATION
- H04J3/00—Time-division multiplex systems
- H04J3/02—Details
- H04J3/08—Intermediate station arrangements, e.g. for branching, for tapping-off
- H04J3/085—Intermediate station arrangements, e.g. for branching, for tapping-off for ring networks, e.g. SDH/SONET rings, self-healing rings, meashed SDH/SONET networks
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04J—MULTIPLEX COMMUNICATION
- H04J2203/00—Aspects of optical multiplex systems other than those covered by H04J14/05 and H04J14/07
- H04J2203/0001—Provisions for broadband connections in integrated services digital network using frames of the Optical Transport Network [OTN] or using synchronous transfer mode [STM], e.g. SONET, SDH
- H04J2203/0028—Local loop
- H04J2203/0039—Topology
- H04J2203/0042—Ring
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Computer Networks & Wireless Communication (AREA)
- Signal Processing (AREA)
- Small-Scale Networks (AREA)
- Optical Communication System (AREA)
Abstract
Selective tributary switching is realized in a bidirectional transmission system by selectively switching, in accordance with the same rules governing the set-up and take down procedures of full line-switching, only that portion of the bandwidth of the particular line which has been provisioned to be line-switched. The remaining bandwidth can be left unprotected or, by for the first time combining line-switched ring functionality with path-switched ring functionality in the same ring transmission system, some remaining bandwidth can be path-switched. Furthermore, another degree of switching freedom is achieved in a four optical fiber bidirectional ring transmission system by selectively span-switching, but not ring-switching, specific bandwidth on the line. To this end, communications circuit provisioning information is provided in the ring nodes as to whether a particular communications circuit should be line-switched or not and, if not, whether it should be span- switched, path-switched or left unprotected.
Description
2 ~ 9 9 9 7 2 APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR SELECTIVELY TRIBUTARY
~w~ G IN A BIDIRECTIONAL
RING TRANSMISSION ~Y~
EYeld of the T . . ~ lc S This in~. ~r relates to ring L. h .-~ on systems and, more particularly, to bidirectional ring ~ n~",i ~:on systems.
BackL~ . ~ of Ule Inventlon It has become illCltdD~Il&~ to In~;ntqin Co,-~.. i~3~ nc comw~livily in the presence of l"~n~.~iC~;On system failures. To this end, path-10 switched ring type ll;'~ n systems and, more recently, bidir~ ~r-l line-switched ring type trN~QmiQQion systems have been proposed that heal co~ if t;o~C circuits in the presence of c~lu;p~ failures, fiber cuts and node failures. Bidi~ line-b..i~hed ring l,~ systems have a ~apacity advantage over path-s~.it~,lLd ring i ~r~mic~i~ ~ systems for all co~ r-15 traffic patterns e~cept a so-called simple hubbed traffic pattern, where the path-v~.it.,h~d and line-svitched ring 1, - -~ ;or systems have the same capacity. Onthe other hand, a path ~..i~l.ed ring l~n~ Lc~;~)n system provides circuit presence at every ring node on the ring tr~nDmivsion system for each co--~ ;O,.c circuitbeing ll~nvpJlted on the ring. In a bidirectional lin~ itihcd ring i --~ ion 20 system, circuit pr~scnce at every ring node for cn~ ;onc circuits prop~i~ti~
on the ring can only be established by employing twice the bandwidth as that used for the same commw~ications circuits in the path-switched ring llD ~ or system.
y, in the b ~ ~ on~' line~ ' -d ring tr~l - .ic5;0~ system, all service bandwidth is ring-prot.,ction-~ l.ed when necessary, and it is not possible to leave 25 anyo~thebandwidth~ byring~ I.ih~g.
Summu~ o~ the ~Yention =- The problems related to ;~ rfi~ u~ dl co ~ ;onc circuit p~ and of lack of bandwidth ~npr~ ~ ~ by ring ;,..;~hin,g in a bidi..
line-~ d tr~,..ission system are o~ o,-.e by selectively ~ ;l,.ng in 30 acc~ld ~e with the same rules govern~ng the set-up and take down procedll~P,s of full line-~ h-l~g, only that po~ion of the bandwidth of the parbicular line which has been pl~,.isioned to be ning-switched. The ~t;...~inin~, bandwidth can be left unprotected or path-~ hed on a co~ n;-~;on~-circuit-by-cc- i~ ns-circuit basis, thereby, for the first time, line-s~ chcd r,ing r....- ~ slity is comhined 35 with path-~ d ring flJ~ ion~ y in the same ring l~n~ on system.
. . . . .
Furthermore, the invention, another degree of switching freedom is achieved in a four-optical-fiber bidirectional line-switched ring tr:~n~mi.ssion system by selectively span-switching, but not ring-switching, specific bandwidth on the line. To this end, communications circuit provisioning information is provided in the ring nodes as to 5 whether a particular communications circuit should be line switched or not and, if not, whether it should be path-switched, span-switched or not switched, i.e., left unprotected. Thus, a determination can be made on a communications-circuit-by-communications-circuit basis whether an individual communications circuit on the ring should be protection switched and, if so, the type of switching to be effected.
In accordance with one aspect of the present invention there is provided a ring node for use in a bidirectional ring tran.smi.ssion system having a plurality of ring nodes interconnected by first and second tr~nsmi~sion paths, the first tr:~nsmission path transporting communication circuits around the ring transmis~ion system from ring node to ring node in a first direction and the second transmis.sion path transporting 15 communications circuits around the ring tr~nsmi.s.sion system from ring node to ring node in a second direction opposite the first direction, the ring node comprising:
means for storing entries identifying communications circuits active in the ring node, a ring node on which each active circuit is termin~te~l7 as well as, a protection switching indication for each active communications circuit to identify which, if any, 20 of said active communication circuits are to be protection switched; means for monitoring signals incoming to the ring node to determine whether one or more ring nodes adjacent to this ring node have failed and for determining the identity of said failed one or more ring nodes; and means responsive to said entries, and to saidmonitoring means for selectively protection switching on a communications-25 circuit-by-communications-circuit basis only those communications circuits in this ring node which are to be protected thereby leaving selected bandwidth in said ring tr~n~mis.sion system unprotected.
In accordance with another aspect of the present invention there is provided a bidirectional ring transmission system including: a plurality of ring nodes; a first 30 tran~mission path interconnecting said plurality of ring nodes and transporting communications circuits around the ring tr~n~mission system from ring node to ring node in a first direction of transmi~sion; a second tr~nsmission path interconnecting - 2a-said plurality of ring nodes and transporting communications circuits around the ring tr:~n~mi~ion system from ring node to ring node in a second direction of tr~n~mi~sion opposite the first direction of tr~n~mis~ion; each of said plurality of ring nodes comprising: means for storing entries identifying communications circuits active in the 5 ring node, a ring node on which each active circuit is termin~ted, as well as, a protection switching indication for each active communications circuit to identify which, if any, of said active communication circuits are to be protection switched;
means for monitoring signals incoming to the ring node to determine whether one or more ring nodes adjacent to this ring node have failed and for determining the identity 10 of said failed one or more ring nodes; and means responsive to said entries, and to said monitoring means for selectively protection switching on a communications circuit-by-communications circuit basis only those communications circuits in this ring node which are to be protected thereby leaving selected bandwidth in said ring tr~nsmi.~.sion system unprotected.
In accordance with yet another aspect of the present invention there is provideda bidirectional ring tr~n~mi~sion system including: a plurality of ring nodes; a first tr~n.~mis~ion path interconnecting said plurality of ring nodes and transportingcommuIlications circuits around the ring tr~n~mi~.~ion system from ring node to ring node in a first direction of tr~n~mi~ion; a second tr~n~mi~.cion path interconnecting 20 said plurality of ring nodes and transporting communications circuits around the ring tr~n~mis~ion system from ring node to ring node in a second direction of tr~n~mis~ion opposite the first direction of tr~n~mi~ion; a method of protection switching only communications circuits to be protected comprising the steps of: provisioning in each of said plurality of ring nodes entries identifying communications circuits active in the 25 ring node, a ring node on which each active circuit is termin~ted, as well as, a protection switching indication for each active communications circuit to identify which, if any, of said active communication circuits are to be protection switched;
monitoring signals incoming to the ring node to determine whether one or more ring nodes adjacent to this ring node have failed; determinin~ the identity of said failed one 30 or more ring nodes; and determining in response to said entries which, if any, of said active communications circuits in the ring node are termin~te~l in said failed one or more ring nodes; and selectively protection switching on a communications - 2b -circuit-by-communications circuit basis in response to said entries only those communications circuits in this ring node which are to be protected thereby leaving selected bandwidth in said ring tr~n~mi~ion system unprotected.
In accordance with still yet another aspect of the present invention there is provided a method for use in a bidirectional ring tr~n~mi~ion system having a plurality of ring nodes interconnected by first and second tr~n~mi~ion paths which transport comlllullications circuits around the ring tr:~n~mi~ion system in respective, opposite directions, the method comprising the steps of: storing for each of individual ones, but less than all, of the communications circuits active in a particular one of the ring nodes an indication that communications circuit is to be protection switched; and upon the failure of a ring node which is adjacent to said particular ring node and which termin~tes a communications circuit that is active in said particular ring node,protection switching that communications circuit if a protection switching indication is stored therefor and leaving that communications circuit non-protection-switched 1 5 otherwise.
Brief Description of the Dr~wil~gs FIG. 1 shows, in simplified block diagram form, a ring tr~n~mi~.~ion system;
FIG. 2 shows, in simplified block diagram form, details of a ring node;
FIG. 3 shows, in simplified block diagram form, details of a squelcher used in the ring node of FIG. 2;
FIG. 4 shows, in simplified block diagram form, details of an AIS insert unit employed in the squelcher of FIG. 3;
FIG. 5 is an exemplary ring node ID table included in memory of the controller of FIG. 2;
FIG. 6 is an exemplary communications circuit ID table also included in memory of the controller of FIG. 2 for ring node 104;
FIG. 7 is another exemplary communications circuit ID table also included in memory of the controller of FIG. 2 for ring node 104;
FIG. 8 is a flow chart illustrating the switching and possible squelching operation of the controller of FIG. 2;
FIG. 9 illustrates the failure message trAn~mi.csion for a complete fiber failure in the bidirectional line-switched ring trAn~mi~ion system; and FIG. 10 illustrates the failure message trAn~mi~ion for a single ring node failure in the bidirectional line-switched ring trAn~mi~ion system.
S Detailed Description FIG. 1 shows, in simplified form, a bidirectional ring trAn~mi.~ion system, in this example, bidirectional line-switched ring trAn~mi~ion system 100, which for brevity and clarity of exposition is shown as including only ring nodes 101 through 104. Ring nodes 101 through 104 are interconnected by trAn.~mi~ion 20~72 path 110 in a counter-clockwise direction and by L~ isQi~- path 120 in a clockwise di.t;~ilion. In this eY~mrlP'~ L~n ...i~ :on paths 110 and 120 are CQ- ~p,;~d of optical fibers and each could be co~ Gd of a single optical fiber or two (2) optical fibers. That is, bidi.-,~Lional line-switched ring L- DmiDQi~n system 100 S could be either a two (2) optical fiber or a four (4) optical fiber system. In a two (2) optical fiber system, each of the fibers in L.~ C~ on paths 110 and 120 includesservice bandwidth and protection bandwidth. In a four (4) optical fiber system, each of l~ on paths 110 and 120 includes an optical fiber for service bandwidth and a separate optical fiber for protection band~ . Such bidue~ line-10 s~ hcd ring tr~nQ-miQsion systems are known. ~ this eY~ n~ n of digital signals in the SONET digital signal format is i?QQIlmrtl However, it will be apparent that the invention is equally applicable to other digital signal formats, for e~ample, the CClIT S,~ ullOUS digital hL,.~cl-~ (SDH) digital signal formats. Inthis e~ample, it is assumed that an optical OC-N SONET digital signal fo1mat is 15 being utilized for i --rniQQi(n over trans-~ic~ic-~ paths 110 and 120. The SON~
digital signal format are described in a Technical Advisory entitled "Sy ~,nous Optical Network (SONET) Transport Systems: Con~ n Generic Criteria", TA-NWT-000253, Bell ~ml ~ ~ 'C-'~ Research, Issue 6, S r ber 1990.
It is noted that requests and a~h~o~.lpdg~ p t~ for pl.~~: ~n switch 20 action are trarlsuil~d in an au~m~tir pl. t;n'~ switch (APS) channel in the SONET o~. berl~ accompanying the protection b~~ .;d~ on each of I ~r~ Q;~n paths 110 and 120. The APS channel, in the SONET fo mat, cs~ ..;~s the K1 and K2 bytes in the SONET overhead of the pl. ~,ctior bandwidth. The K1 byte indicates a request of a co~ ;ons circuit for switch action. The first four (4) 25 bits of the K1 byte indicate the switch request priority and the la,st four (4) bits indicale the ring node id~ ;r.~3~i~m (ID). The K2 byte in~lir~tps an achlo~lndg..-P ~l of the requested-protection switch action. The first four (4) bits of the K2 byte indicate the ring node ID and the last 4 bits indicate the action taken. For p~)o~s of this ~Pscrirti l, a "col~ nc circuit" is con~;~e~d to be a SONET STS-3 30 digital signal having its entry and exit points on the ~ing.
Each of ring nodes 101 through 104 co~ s an add-drop m~ rlp~er (ADM~. For generic ~ u~..,enls of a SONET based ADM see the ~echnical Reference entitled "SONET ADD-DROP MultirlPY Flluir.~.el~ (SONET ADM) GENERIC CRITERIA", TR-TSY-000496, Issue 2, S'~r ml~er 1989, Sllppl~ment 1, 35 S~r s~ mber 1991, Bell Communi~tion~ Resear~h. In this eY~rl~, the ADM
operates in a ~ $ion sense to pass signals through the ring node, to add signals - . ~ : ~ .
2(39~S~72 at the ring node, to drop signals at the ring node, to bAdge signals during a pl-~ r~n switch and to loop-baclc-switch signals duAng a ~ro~ ~ ,tio~ switch at the Ang node.
FIG. 2 shows, in ~ plifiPd block diagram form, details of ring nodes 101 through 104, inr~ ng an embodiment of the ,.~ In this example, a S west(W~to-east(E) digital signal I -- ~ direction is assumed in the service bandwidth and the protection bandwidth on transmission path llû. It will be apparent that operation of the ring node and the ADM therein would be similar for an east(E)-to-west(W) digital signal n~n~ c:o.~ ection in the service bandwidth and the plU'f ,,ti~ - bandwidth on tr~,~ s~ - - path 120. Specifi~l1y~ shown is 10 trAn~ on path 110 entering the ring node and supplying an OC-N SONET optical signal to receiver 201, where N could be, for e~nrl~ 12 or 48. Receiver 201 includes an oplical/~,ltchi~,dl (O/E) ~ ~ ce 202 and a dem~ pl t~,r (DEMIJX) 203, which yields at least one (1) STS-M SONET digital signal. Such O/E interfaces and dPm~ll'ip!~-~A~e are known. In this ~ , M is assumed to be three (3) and N
15 is greater than M. In order to ~co---pli~h line-;,..;t~l,..~g in a two optical fiber line~ d ring ~ c~ system, M must be a divisor of N/2. In ~ccoldd~ct with the pl,nc El s of the ~ tion, however, M must be no greater thanthe tributary level which it is desired to path plU ~ion switch. The STS-M signal output from DEMUX 203 is supplied to ~I~Jrl l.. r (S) 204 which, under con~ol of20 controller, 205 controllably ~ lr~ i.e., blocks, particular inromin~
communirations circuits by inserting an alarm ~ signal (AIS), as described below. Details of s~u~Pl~ h~r (S) 204 are shown in FIGs. 3 and 4 and its op~Pr~ on is df sc- ;hed below. Thereafter, the STS-M signal, ~lu~ 1~ hCd or o~ . i~, is supplied to monitor element 230 and to bl~ element 206. Monitor element 230 checks 25 the passing communication circuit signal for con~iition~ such as loss of signal (LOS~
or for parameters such as a bit error rate (BER). Such monitor çl- "P,~1ci are known in the art. A b~oade~l element l.pU ~ ~ the STS-M signal supplied to it and supplies the replicated signals as a plurality of individual outputs. Such l~lv~dc~l elements are known. Bfva~ t element 206 generates three identiral STS-M signals 3û and supplies one STS-M signal to an input of 3:1 selector 207, a second STS-Msignal to an inpu~ of 2:1 selector 208 and a third STS-M signal to an input of 3:1 seleetor 209. An STS-M signal output from 3:1 selector 207 is supplied to s~ r (S) 210, which is identical to sq~,Pl~hf~ (S) 204. SquelchPr (S) 21û is employed, under control of controUer 205, to squelch particular outgoing co~ ons 35 circuits. The STS-M signal output from squelrher (S) 210 is supplied to L~ P~
211 and, therein, to mllltirlpy~pr (MUX) 212. The output of MUX 212 is an elPc~rir~
. :, - .: .
.. ~ :, . ~, '................. . .
'. .
':': ' : ' ,'' .:
2 0 ~ ~3 ~ ~ f~J
OC-N digital signal, which is i.~ . r~- ed to 11 --~missi~ path 110 via electrical/optical (E/O) ~ q r -e 213.
Similarly, in the east(E)-to-west(W) direction an OC-N optical signal is supplied via ~, j,nS....~s or path 120 tO receiver 214 and, therein, to opticall~
S (O/E) ~ ~l r ~e 215. In turn, demll~t~ ey~r (DEMUX) 216 yields a STS-M signal which is supplied via S~I~J~1r~ (S) 217 tO monitor element 231 and then to b~ildcuDl element 218. Broadcslst element 218 Ic~ t~ s the STS-M signal into a plurality of iden~ir~l STS-M signals, in this example, three (3). One STS-M signal is supplied to an input of 3:1 selector 207, a second STS-M signal is supplied to an 10 input of 2:1 selector 208 and a third STS-M signal is supplied to an input of 3:1 selector 209. An output from 3:1 selector 209 is supplied via s.~ - h ~ (S) 219 to transmitter 220. In l-Ar~ 220, multiplexer (MUX) 221 molti~ YPs the STS-M
into an electrical OC-N and, then, clc~,l, ,s"optical (E/O) ~ ~ r 222 supplies the optical OC-N signal to trsn;,.nissiorl path 120.
Controller 205 operates to effect the plo~iv,ol~ed line-switching and d~ ;e squelrhing of c~ ;on~ circuits, or path s ..it~,hmg.
Ad~iiti~ 'ly, as i~ d below, a l~ ion to span-switching of a particuls~r communications circuit can also be realized in a four fiber b~ ional line-s~. '-d ring ~s -mj~ ~ system. Controller 205 co- ~ ni~1rs with ~rceiv~l~ 201 20 smd 214 and ~ .,-s 211 and 2220 via bus 223 and with intP~ce 224 via bus 227. Specific~ly~ controller 205 monitors the i~O...;I~g digital signals to drlr~ ;ne loss-of-signs~l, SONET format K bytes and the like. A-idi~ion~lly, controller 205 causes the ins~ of appropriate K byte .~e5s~aPs for protection v~ hing pw~,ov~s, e~s~mples of which slre desc~ihed below. To realize the desired 25 deterministic squelching of the cs~ ;onQ- circuits, controller 205 is ad~ , p~u,ioned via bus 228 with the i~entitif s (IDS) of all the communi~ions circuits passing through the ring node, as well as those comm.lr --- circuits being added and/or dropped at the ring node and the iden~itip~s of all the ring nodes in bidi~ ional line~ .i~hed ring 100. The 30 s~,Jf ~ g of C5~ nC circuits under control of controller 205 is dPscribed below. Controller 205 co.. ~ ~s with m-~nitors 230 and 231 to compare the health of ~wo copies of an in~omill~ path-s~ l.cd csnlm~ c~tionQ circuit, and then instructv selector 208 to pick the better of the two copies.
T..~. ~ r~~ 224 is employed to interface to a particular duplex link 225 3S and could include any desired a""nE,e n~nt For e~mrl~, in~ fe 224 could include a DS3 digital signal interface to a DSX, an STS-lE (elect~ical) SONFI
.. ~ . , .. . ~ . . .
: . .. . . .
'~ 0 ~ 7 2 digi~l signal ~ E to a DSX, an optical ~h-~ on i,.t.-.ri-~v to an OC-N
SONET optical signal or the like. Such il.~ . r;-~e arrang,e.~v.lb are known.
~pecific~l1y, a signal (R) to be dropped at the ring node is supplied to interface 224 via 2:1 selector 208, under control of controller 205, from either bloddv~l element 5 206 or broadcast element 218. In turn, intPrfa~e 224 supplies the ~y~uyliate signal to duplex link 22S. A signal (I) to be added at the ring node is supp}ied from duplex link 225 to interface 224 where it is co.l~vitvd to the STS-M digital signal format, if necessary. The STS-M digital signal is then supplied to bluadc~l element 226 where it is rcpli ~l~ The le~ ,d STS-M digital signals are supplied by 10 Ifoadcd~l element 226 to an input of 3:1 selector 207 and an input of 3:1 selector 209. In this e~ml~'v~ 3:1 sP1ectors 207 and 209, under control of controller 205, select the signal being added for ~ c~iOn in the service bandwidth or the pr~ ti--bandwidthoneither~ c..~ path110ortr~ npath120.
It should be noted that, in this eY~nlplP, the normal ~ ;C_ ~n path for 15 a digital signal being added at the ring node would be in the service bandwidth on tr~~ ,;on path 120, for e~~~r'~ towards the west (W). The following desçribes the ~lIVCvdlllv for those Cf '~ circuits which are to be line-switched, if there were to be a protection switch. The signal (T) being added from interface 224 would be bridged via ~roadc~l element 226 and chosen by 3:1 selector 207, under 20 control of controller 205, to the plolvvlion bandwidth on ~ r.~--.k~ion path 110.
Similarly, if there were to be a loo~back plu: switch and the ring node was adjacent to the failure, the signal (R) to be dropped at the ring node would be received in the protection bandwidth on li~n;,...icc;Q-~ path 120 and would be switched ~om bl~C~t element 218 via 2:1 selector 208 to intRrf~ce 224. It is 25 noted that "failure" or "ring node failure' as used herein is intended to include node equipment failur and so-called node isolation failurv caused by optical fiber cuts, cable cuts or the like. O~v.~.ise, the signal (R) to be dropped would be switvhed in a ring node adjacent the failure ~om the ~o ~r bandwidth on ll~r~ i -io~ path 120 to the service bandwid~ on l~hrs-~ ion path 110 and received at the nng node30 in usual fashion. Then, the signal (R) being dropped from ~ path 110 is supplied via ~ t element 206 and 2:1 selector 208 to - rfaçe 224.
As indicated above, controller 205 m- ~ ' the status of interface 224 and the digital signal supplied thereto via bus 227. Specifi~l1y, controller 205monitors ;,~t ~r~ ~e 224 for loss-of-signal, coding violations and the like, i.e, a signa1 35 failure csn~liti- n . . - . .
,, . ~ . . . .
.
~ ~ : , ,' .',.,, ~ , . ~ , .
2~99~72 Under control of controller 205, as previously noted, digital signals may be passed through, added at, dropped at, bridged at or loop-back-s~.it~hcd at the ring node. A loop-back-switch of an STS-M digital signal inrom;ng in the service b~-ld~ on i l~ path 110 is effected by controller 205 causing 3:1 5 selector 209 to select the STS-M digital signal from l~ adcd~l element 206 andsupplying it via s~ ' (S) 219 to l.~-~--..;u~. 220. In turn, n~ . 220 supplies an OC-N optical signal to the prc:~ ~n bandwidth on ~ on path 120. It will be apparent that in the loop-back-switch operation, if the signal is iiu~o.~ vp in a service bandwidth on ~ n path 110, it will be loop-back-10 switched to the protection bandwidth on llh~ O~ path 120 and vice versa. ~ thesignal is i~w--~;ng in pr~ n bandwidth on I~ r~l~ path 110, it will be loop-back-s~ l.ed to the service bandwidth on 1~ cr- path 120 and vice versa. A signal to be added at the ring node is supplied from interface 224, nF'i- ~ ~ via blv~adc&~l element 226 and selected either by 3:1 selector 207 or 3:1 15 selector 209, under control of controller 205, to be added on ~ r~ path 110 or 1, --rni.ccir~n path 120~ lvspe.;li.vly. A digital signal to be dropped at the ring node is selected by 2:1 selector 208, under control of controller 205, either ~om bloddrv&sl element 206 (h - ~ ~~i$~ n path 110) or broadcast element 218 (tran~ ;on path 120). The pass-through and loop-back-switch ru~ )r- for a 20 signal in-o...;n~ on ~ ni~;on path 120 is identical to that for an il~ro~ v signal on transnlissioll path 110.
Possible cc ~ r~;r-- circuit ~;~o~ clionc are avoided in b;d ~ tior-' line-switched ring 100 by d t~ ....;n: ~;c~lly ~ ' g c~r~ -- - on.ccircuits to be line-s.. ' -~ that are i ~ -' d in a failed ring node in ring nodes 25 adjacent to the failed ring nodes(s). The adjacent failed ring nodes can include a plurality of nodes i,.~1...li,~g those that appear to be failed because of being isolated by other failed ring nodes or by fiber and/or cable cuts. To Ws end, each ring node in I ',d'r~i- ~~' line-switched ring ~s~ system 100 is typically e~uirped to effect the desired squelching via sq~lelchPr~ (S) 2W, 210, 217 and 219, under con~ol 30 of controller 205. In this ~ , both i~.~o~ g and outgoing communications -circuits are ~ P~ 1, however, it may only be necessa~y to squelch outgoing co..--~ ;one circuits.
FIG. 3 shows, in ~imrlifipd block diagram form, details of an e~emplary sql~PlchPr (S) unit. Sp_cifically, the STS-M digital signal is supplied to 35 demllltirlPYPr (DEMUX) 301 where it is dem~lltip1~YPd into its con~tit~en~ M STS-l digital signals 302-1 through 302-M. The M STS-l digital signals are supplied on a : ' . : : , . ,-; - : : ,.. . ... .. . . .
, . ~ . . : . . . . , ;. . .
2 0 9 ~ ~7 2 one-to-one basis to AIS insert units 303-1 through 303-M. AIS insert units 303-1through 303-M, under control of controller 205, insert AIS in the STS-l digital signals included in the commnnir~irJns circuits, i.e., STS-M digital signals, to be sqne~ Details of AIS insert units 303 are shown in FIG. 4 and described below.
5 The edr~,r, the M STS-l d~igital signals are mu1~ir~ ~Pd in n~ltipl r.qr ~MUX) 304 to yield the desired STS-M digital signal. The details of rn~lltip!~Y schemes for the STS-M digital signal are dPscn'hed in the tP~hnir~l advisory TA-NWT-000253, ,Ç4~ red above.
F~G. 4 shows, in si ~pl;~ed block diagram form, details of AIS insert 10 units 303. Specifically, shown is an STS-l digital signal being supplied to AIS
g~r n- -~tor 401 and to one input of 2:1 selector 402. AIS gen~dtol 401 operates to insert AIS in the STS-l digita'i signal. As in~ d in the t~chnic~l advisory TA-NWT-000253, the STS path AIS is an "all ones" (l's) signal in the STS-l G~
bytes Hl, H2 and H3 and in the bytes of the entire STS SPE (s~ ch~ us payload 15 c~l~"lopc). Selector 402 selects as an output, under control of controller 205, eit'ner the ' --, ~ing STS-l digital signal or the STS-l digital signal with AIS inserted from AIS ~r ~ or 401.
FIG. S is a table ir~1u(1ing the j(~entiqC '- (ID) of ring nodes 101 through 104. The ring node IDs are stored in a look-up table which is provisioned 20 via 228 in memory of controller 205. As L~d;: ~~d above, the ring node lI)s are 4 bit words and are included in the second 4 bits of the Kl bytes and the first 4 bits of tne K2 bytes in the APS channel.
FIG. 6 is il~ dti~V of a table in~ inD the i~entific~tion of all the active communications circuits in a ring node, in this ~ rl~ ring node 104, for a 25 counter~locl~-.ise co~ n through nodes 101 through 104 (FIG. 1). The active comm. ~ ~ ~ - circuits include those being added, being dropped or passing through ring nodb 104. The table inrlu(li~ the IDs of the active co.. ~ ir~;on~
circuits in the ring QOde are l~lu.i;~ioned via input 228 in a look-up table in memory ~of controller 205. Shown in the table of FIG. 6 are (a) the STS-M co--.~ tion~
30 circuit t~l~hçr.~ (#) b through f; (b) an idp~l;rl~a~;on of the ring node which includes the com.~ tion~ circuit entry point, i.e., the A It~""i~ ~ jon for the communications circuit; and (c) an idc ~lific ~;OI- of the ring node which includes the communications circuit exit point, i.e., the Z le~ otirn for the c--- - or~
circui~ Thus, ~e ~ _ ~ion~ circuit ID table of FIG. S, shows that STS-M(b) 35 enters ring 100 at ring node 104 and exits at ring node 102; STS-M(c) enters ring 100 at ring node 103 and exits a~ ring node 101; STS-M(d) enters ring 100 at ring ., . ~ .................... ~ . . . .: . . -- . .. . ., ... : . ~
~ 0 ~ 2 g node 102 and e~its at ring node 101; STS-M(e) enters ring 100 at ring node 103 and exits at ring node 102; and STS-M(f) enters ring 100 at ring node 103 and e~its at ring node 104. Although the ring nodes drcigJlqted ac A le~ ;nnc are consid~ed entry points and the ring nodes dç~igr- -~ as Z t~ are considered exit S points, it will be apparent that the individual co~.n~nn;~ ~;ons circuits may be duplex circuits having both entry and exit points at each such node. It should be noted that hel~t~,folG all Colnm ~ ~Jionc circuits would be line-v.. ~-~ but now it is possible to line-switch a subset of the co~ fi- ~I;nnc circuits nd to path-switch anothersubset of the co~ ~r~ k~tinnc circuits, as desired. Thus, as shown in FIG. 6, STS-10 M(b), STS-M(c) and STS-M(d) are provisioned, to be line-s..ilcLcd and STS-M(e) and STS-M(f~ are prov;v;olled to be path-switched.
Also e~ro~--p~s~Pd is Uhe capability of leaving a subset of the cc~ - circuits unprc ~t~d And in a four optical fiber bidirectional line-switch ring 1., rL ..i~;o-- system, it is now also possible to specify whether span-15 s..ilching of co-~ flon.c circuits will be employed or not. These conrept~ are illustrated in FIG. 7 which, is illu;~h~. ive of another e~Pmp'~ ~ table in~luAing the i~c-~ r of all the active co-....~J~irS~;ons circuits in ring node 104, for counter-clockwise cQmm---~- on through ring nodes 101 through 104.
SpecJfir~ly, FIG. 7 illustrates how unprotected or span-switched cc.--....-~-~ications 20 circuits are provisioned via input 228 in a look-up table in memory of controller 205 (FIG. 2) in a four fiber ring tr~s~ sion system. Comm--- -- onc circuit~c (STS-M(b) through STS-M(f) are provisioned as shown in FIG. 6 and descrihed above.
Cor~mur ~ ~~nc circuit STS-M(g) is span-s..il4hed only, and co ..~.v ~ir~ >nc circuit STS-M~h) is unprotected.
25FIG. 8 is a flow chart i~ ;,hdliilg the o~ _ ~ of controller 205 in controlling the ~F~ ~r of the ring nodes in order to effect the provisioned (and the d~ l;r squelrhilu~, if ncccssa,~) of comn~llnir~~ nc circuits in the pll,~nce of a failure. ~pecifir~lly~ ~e process is entered via step 801.
Then, opr~t~ 1 block 802 cau es the K bytes of an inCQming OC-N signal to be 30 obs,.~_d and pl~eS3eS the ring node IDs therein. Then, coln~ )nsl branch point 8Q3 tests to ~ t~.. ;.~f if the p,vcessed ring node IDs indicate that one or more ring nodes have failed. Again, a ring node failure is defined as to include node e~lù;p~r ..l failure and so-called node isolation failure caused by fiber cuts and the like. Specific e~amples of failure con~litionc are ~;c- I~,~s~d below. If the plocessed ring node IDs 35 indicate no ring node failure, the failure is other than a ring node failure and control is passed to operational block 804. Similarly, if steip 803 ir~icaPs a single ring node , - - ~ -- ~ , , ~
- , ,.. ~ , ~ , . . .
' ' : ' . , . ', ; ' , 209~72 failure, the failed ring node ID is already known and control is also passed directly to step 804. If the p/oces~d ring node IDs indicate a multiple ring node failure, operational block 805 cau~s the failed ring node IDs to be obtained from the ring node ID look-up table in memory (~G. 5). Then, as in the other two in~t~eS~
S control is passed to opPrs~iC--l block 804. O~ -1 block 804 causes the identity (ID) of the affected com~ ;onc circuits to be obtained - whether or not any particular such cc_ - '--'--- circuit is to be line-,~ l.cd (or possibly ~quelched), and if not line-switched, whether or not it is to be path-s.. ~c~ -d, and if not path~ hed, whether or not it is to be span-switched from the co~ irations 10 circuit ID look-up table (E:IG. 7) in memory of controller 205 (FIG. 2). Once the affected cc~ ;onQ circuits are idpntifi~ co~litio~s1 branch points 806, 810 and 812 separate the control process depe~ding upon whe~er the affected individual co-- -- ' ations circuit should be line-s..i~ c~r not, should be path s..;~hed or not, or-should span-b.. ;~l.ed or not. It should be noted that if the co.. -~
15 circuit is not line-;,..itchcd, path-switched or span~ ,hcd, it is left ~n~lo~ - .. It will be apparent to those skilled in the a~t that the individual affected c~ m '- - -- circuits can be arranged into ~ub~ r s of comm~ bl;O-~c circuits to be either line-;,~ ihcd, path-switched, span~ -d only or not switched, i.e., left UII~ ,' _' ' If the co~ ications circuit is to be line-~ hed, as d~ ;n~d 20 in step 806, operational block 807 causes, if nc~ssal~, the a~ ~ ones of (S) 204, 210, 217 and 219 (FIG. 2), in this eY2mrle, to squelch those i-4ntified com.--ur a '~--- circuits in the ring node. As ~ 1;r~ted above, all line-hc~ com~unications circuits active in this ring node that are terminated in afailed ring node are s~luel~hed Opersltir -1 block 808 IIIeI~JPOI1 causes the line-25 switehed communica~ons circuits not ~",;l~t d in the failed ring node(s) to bebridged and b.. ~' ~-;1 to "heal" the ring. ThGl~art~., the process is ended in step 809.
If a communications circuit is to be path-s~.it ,hed, as d~ t~ n~d in steps 806 and 810, operational block 811 co~.p~-~,s, via monitor~ 230 and 231 (FIG. 2), the relative health of the two copies of the particular c-~mrn ~ir~tion~ circuit, and engages30 path-switching in selector 208 (FIG. 2), if a~ u~,liate. Thereafter, the process is ended in step 809. If the affected co--.~ ;~n~ circuit is not to be ei~er line-s~ d or path-switched as d~t -.~ d in steps 806 and 810, conditi~n~l branch point 812 tests to d~ b -,,,;nr whether or not the commnni~-t --- circuit is to be span~ chcd. If the affected co~ P~ion~ circuit is to be span-s-. ,hc~.
35 ope~tio~l block 814 effects the span-s~it~hing as applu~Jl;at,. Thereafter, the process is ended in step 809. Again, if the affected comm-lnic~ti-)n~ circuit is to be : . , - .:- : . .
. . .
2~9~972 Ieft unprotected as d~ t ....;.~rd in steps 806, 810 and 812 the process is ended in step 809.
FIG. 9 i~ tr~ps the failure message l~r~-"~ in the ~J!o~ c prote~cti~n switch (APS) channel Kl bytes for a tt~ pa~th failure in S b~ P,cfion~ line-switched ring lO0. In this ~ ~le the failure is shown as being in tr~ paths 110 and 120 between ring nodes 101 and 102. Ring node 101 detects loss-of-signal from ring node 102 on i~o-~ Qo;~n path 120. Loss-of-signal as used herein is intended to include other ;-~d:c ~ such as loss-of-frame, high bit error rate or the like. Then, ring node 101 l..~ a line-switch request 10 message idenlirying the signal from ring node 102 as having failed. Speçifi~ ~1ly~ the line-switch request n~Cc~ges are ~ td in the APS channel Kl byte on tran; ~ ~ ~ - - path 120 away from the failure toward ring node 104. This line-switch request message is designated SFL/102. Ring node 101 also 1, -n~it.~ a span-switch request message in the APS charmel Kl byte on ~. r~",j ~:on path 110 towards the15 failure. The spa- v..i~h request message is de-~ SFS/102. It should be noted, h~ f, that a span-switch request is only issued and can only be realized in a four (4) fiber bidirectional line-s..;b~hed ring traln- ;cc~ system 100. Ring node 104 .COg~ S that the line-switch request message SFL/102 in the ~ ro-~ g APS
channel Kl byte does not identify an adjacent ring node and passes the line-switch 20 request message on to ring node 103. Similarly, ring node 103 passes the line-switch request message on to ring node 102. In turn, ring node 102 recog~i~Ps its own ID in the SFL/102 line-switch request message, which ~ '~ s to Ang node 102 that a Ang node has not failed. Since there was no ring node failure, there is no need to squeleh any of the comm -- ic~;o ~ eireuits aetive in ring node 102. Ring node 102 25 doev, ~ , effeet a loop-back-switch of line-switched co~ ;o.-~ circuits d at the ~ing node in the service ~- - h.;JIh on ~ ..ki;n~ path 120 to the pro~ion bandwidth on tran., ~s ~ path 110 for con~ n;cations circuits intended for other ring nodes in nng 100. Ring node 102 also effects a ring loop-back-switch of line-v.. it~,hcd communications cireuits entering the node that were intended to be 30 tra l~ ~itted in the service bandwidth on ~ -.ic~:or path 120 to the protection band~ndth on l~r~ ciol~ path 110. Any co-- .~. ~;e~tiltr~ circuits received at ring node 102 that are intended to be dropped from either the service bandwidth or pro~.:lio.l bandwidth on lli.h~ ion path 120, are supplied to ' ~ e 224 (FIG.
2), under control of controller 205, as de~s~ribed above. Any ca-- -a~c-~
35 circuits to be path-switched alre path-switched at their l- ....in~ion Ang nodes if the cw~ent path selection~ are affected by the failure.
~ , :, . .; :
.. -,- -, . ~ . , . :~ , ... .
'2~3~7~
Similarly, ring node 102 detects a loss-of-signal from ring node 101 on on path 110 because of the failure in trarls--~ on paths 110 and 120 between ring nodes 101 and 102. Then, ring node 102 ~ a line-switch request message ide.~ .ng the signal from ring node 101 as having failed in the S APS channel Kl byte on ~ --.ics:on path 110. This line-switch request message is de-s-igr ~ SFL/101. Ring node 102 also i~ s a span-switch request message in the APS channel Kl byte on i 1~-miQ~;on path 120 towards the failure. The span-switch request message is d~P~igratPd SFS/101. Again, it should be noted that a span-switch request is only issued and can only be realized in a four (4) fiber 10 bidh.,~,Lional line-~ ring ~ system 100. Ring node 103 1~co~:, s that the line-switch request SFL/101 in the i~o--~ g APS channel Kl byte does not identify an adjacent ring node and pa~es the line-switch request message on to ring node 104. Similarly, ring node 104 passes the line-switch request message on to ring node 101. In turn, ring node 101 rec~ni7Ps its own ID in tbe SFL/101 line-switch15 request ~s~ which: ~ ,r to rhlg node 101 that a ring node has not failed.
Since there was no ring node failure, there is no need to squelch any of the co--..n. ~ ;o~ circuits active in ring node 101. Ring node 101 does, however, effect a loop-back-switch of line-s..;t~hed co~ circuits received at the ring node in the service bandwidth on transmission path 110 to the protection 20 bandwidth on t.,~ path 120 for c - ~ ' - a ~nr circuits intended for other ring nodes in ring 100. Ring node 101 effects a ring loop-back-switch of line-s~ t cc ~ ~ circuits entering the node that were intended to be d in the service band~.idlll on trans-~ on path 110 to the pl()~ ~-bdl-d..;.ll}l on tran~ ;o~ path 120. Any co~ v~;r l~;O"5 circuits received at ring 25 node 101 that are intended to be dropped from either the service bandwidth or- - bandwidth on l.~n-.ni~ path 110, are supplied as dPQcrihed above, under control of-controller 205 to in~ e 224 (FIG. 2). Any c- -- ~ ~ on~
circuits t~ be p~th-switched are path-switched at their ~ ~ ~ir ~ ring nodes if the cu~ent path Q~PIçctionQ are affected by the failure.
FIG. 10 iil~QtratP5 the failure message ~ 5;r~n in the a~tr~n~qti~
~l'O -~ - switch (APS) channel via the Kl byte for a single ring node failure inql line-s..;tehed ring 100. Tn this-example, the failure is shown as being in ring node 101. Ring node 102 detects a loss-of-signal from ring node 101 on tr~ o-Qio~ path 110 because of the failure of node 101. Then, ring node 102 35 ~ -o~ .o~ a line-swit~h request message ide-llilying the signal from ring node 101 as having failed in ~he APS channel Kl byte on ~ o~- path 110 away from ~e .
~, -: - :
20~72 failllre toward ring node 103. This line-switch request signal is decigrqt~d SFL/101.
Ring node 102 also l"~r ~ a span-switch request message from the APS channel Kl byte on L~ paths 120 towards failed node 101. The span-switch request message is ~esigr- i SFs/lOl. AS in(~ic ~ ~ above, a span-switch is only5 issued and can only be realized in a four (4) fiber b J~ -l line-~ ring L~ ;on system 100. Ring node 103 recognizes that the line-switch request message SFL/101 in the i~lco~;ng APS channel Kl byte does not identify an adjacent ring node and, Ih~,.er~3lG, passes the line-switch request message on to ring node 104. Ring node 104 lecGgl~i~s that the line-switch request message SFL/101 10 includes the ID of the adjacent failed ring node 101. A single node failure is indjC '~,d because ring node 104 has also detected loss-of-signal from ring node 101 on ll~n~ on path 120. CO~ eQI1Y~ ring node 104, under control of controller 205 (FIG. 2), causes all active line-;,..i~hed co~ ;r~l;on~ circuits in ring node 104 intended for ring node 101 to be ~ hed The Qquel'~hin~ iS realized as 15 ~-i~d above in conjunction with FIG. 2 and the process of FIG. 8. Specific~l1y, ~cÇc.ling to the co-~ ,t;onc circuit ID table for ring node 104 in FIG. 6 or F~G.
7, it is seen that cor.. v~ s~i-)nc circuits STS-M (c) and STS-M (d) are to be lrh.o(1 Lh~e-s~ CO~ C circuit STS-M (b) is identified as not being t~ ted in ring node 101 and, Ihc~cro.~ no squelrhing is effected for it.
20 Thus, co~ a - l~ circuit STS-M(b) is ring loop-back-switched in ring node 104to the protection bandwidth on l.i nc...;cci,~n path 120 and supplied thereon to ring node 102 where it is ~ o~, ;at~ly dropped, in the manner ~esrrihed above. Path-switched co------~ r ~;r.~c circuits STS-M(e) and STS-M(f) are path-switched at their terminations if the current path splr~l;onc are affected by the failure of ring 25 node 101. Co~ mications circuit STS-M(f) is not affected by the failure of node 101 and com~ orn between ring nodes 103 and 104 are realized in normal fashio~
As inr~ d above, ring node 104 detects a loss-of-signal on ein~ path 120 from failed ring node 101. Then, ring node 104 transmits a 30 line-switch request message idenliryil~g the signal firom ring node 101 as having failed in the APS channel Kl byte on h -en~i~ci~r path 120 away from the failuretoward nng node 103. Again, this line-switch request message is ~ecign ~
E~LL/101. Ring node 104 also ~ i~ a span-switch request message in the APS
channel Kl byte on ~ ...i.c.~;on path 110 towards the failed node 101. The span-35 switch request message is ~esign ~ SFS/101. As in~ at~d above, a span-switch can only be realized in a four (4) fiber bid.~ ional line-switched ring ~ ...i.c~ n .: - ... . .
2G99~7~
system 100. Ring node 103 recognizes that the line-switch request SFL/101 i~co~ in the APS channel on l.rr~ in~ path 120 does not identify an adjacent failed node and passes the line-switch request me~ssage on to ring node 102. Ring node 102 recognizes that the line-switch request message includes the ID of an S adjacent failed ring node, namely, ring node 101. A single ring node failure is a ~ because ring node 102 has detected loss-of-signal from Ang node 101 and has received a line-switch request message idenli~ing node 101 as having failed.Conc~ve~ ~Iy~ ring node 102 will squelch all active line-sw ~-hPd c~ ;onc circuits ~ ~ ~e d for ring node 101. Line-switched communications circuits 10 terminated in others of the ring nodes in ring 100 are lp~ ~Ipliat~ bridged and loop-back- ~..itihed as required to "heal" the ring 100. As indicated above, CC'-~ J'- _"O"Q circuits to be path-~..;~l.ed are path-~ d at their t~ ;or ring nodes if the current path ~PlPctionC are affected by the failure.
- . ... :- ..... .. : ~. . . . . . - .
.
~ : . . : , . . ~, , . . ~ . .. ,. ~
~w~ G IN A BIDIRECTIONAL
RING TRANSMISSION ~Y~
EYeld of the T . . ~ lc S This in~. ~r relates to ring L. h .-~ on systems and, more particularly, to bidirectional ring ~ n~",i ~:on systems.
BackL~ . ~ of Ule Inventlon It has become illCltdD~Il&~ to In~;ntqin Co,-~.. i~3~ nc comw~livily in the presence of l"~n~.~iC~;On system failures. To this end, path-10 switched ring type ll;'~ n systems and, more recently, bidir~ ~r-l line-switched ring type trN~QmiQQion systems have been proposed that heal co~ if t;o~C circuits in the presence of c~lu;p~ failures, fiber cuts and node failures. Bidi~ line-b..i~hed ring l,~ systems have a ~apacity advantage over path-s~.it~,lLd ring i ~r~mic~i~ ~ systems for all co~ r-15 traffic patterns e~cept a so-called simple hubbed traffic pattern, where the path-v~.it.,h~d and line-svitched ring 1, - -~ ;or systems have the same capacity. Onthe other hand, a path ~..i~l.ed ring l~n~ Lc~;~)n system provides circuit presence at every ring node on the ring tr~nDmivsion system for each co--~ ;O,.c circuitbeing ll~nvpJlted on the ring. In a bidirectional lin~ itihcd ring i --~ ion 20 system, circuit pr~scnce at every ring node for cn~ ;onc circuits prop~i~ti~
on the ring can only be established by employing twice the bandwidth as that used for the same commw~ications circuits in the path-switched ring llD ~ or system.
y, in the b ~ ~ on~' line~ ' -d ring tr~l - .ic5;0~ system, all service bandwidth is ring-prot.,ction-~ l.ed when necessary, and it is not possible to leave 25 anyo~thebandwidth~ byring~ I.ih~g.
Summu~ o~ the ~Yention =- The problems related to ;~ rfi~ u~ dl co ~ ;onc circuit p~ and of lack of bandwidth ~npr~ ~ ~ by ring ;,..;~hin,g in a bidi..
line-~ d tr~,..ission system are o~ o,-.e by selectively ~ ;l,.ng in 30 acc~ld ~e with the same rules govern~ng the set-up and take down procedll~P,s of full line-~ h-l~g, only that po~ion of the bandwidth of the parbicular line which has been pl~,.isioned to be ning-switched. The ~t;...~inin~, bandwidth can be left unprotected or path-~ hed on a co~ n;-~;on~-circuit-by-cc- i~ ns-circuit basis, thereby, for the first time, line-s~ chcd r,ing r....- ~ slity is comhined 35 with path-~ d ring flJ~ ion~ y in the same ring l~n~ on system.
. . . . .
Furthermore, the invention, another degree of switching freedom is achieved in a four-optical-fiber bidirectional line-switched ring tr:~n~mi.ssion system by selectively span-switching, but not ring-switching, specific bandwidth on the line. To this end, communications circuit provisioning information is provided in the ring nodes as to 5 whether a particular communications circuit should be line switched or not and, if not, whether it should be path-switched, span-switched or not switched, i.e., left unprotected. Thus, a determination can be made on a communications-circuit-by-communications-circuit basis whether an individual communications circuit on the ring should be protection switched and, if so, the type of switching to be effected.
In accordance with one aspect of the present invention there is provided a ring node for use in a bidirectional ring tran.smi.ssion system having a plurality of ring nodes interconnected by first and second tr~nsmi~sion paths, the first tr:~nsmission path transporting communication circuits around the ring transmis~ion system from ring node to ring node in a first direction and the second transmis.sion path transporting 15 communications circuits around the ring tr~nsmi.s.sion system from ring node to ring node in a second direction opposite the first direction, the ring node comprising:
means for storing entries identifying communications circuits active in the ring node, a ring node on which each active circuit is termin~te~l7 as well as, a protection switching indication for each active communications circuit to identify which, if any, 20 of said active communication circuits are to be protection switched; means for monitoring signals incoming to the ring node to determine whether one or more ring nodes adjacent to this ring node have failed and for determining the identity of said failed one or more ring nodes; and means responsive to said entries, and to saidmonitoring means for selectively protection switching on a communications-25 circuit-by-communications-circuit basis only those communications circuits in this ring node which are to be protected thereby leaving selected bandwidth in said ring tr~n~mis.sion system unprotected.
In accordance with another aspect of the present invention there is provided a bidirectional ring transmission system including: a plurality of ring nodes; a first 30 tran~mission path interconnecting said plurality of ring nodes and transporting communications circuits around the ring tr~n~mission system from ring node to ring node in a first direction of transmi~sion; a second tr~nsmission path interconnecting - 2a-said plurality of ring nodes and transporting communications circuits around the ring tr:~n~mi~ion system from ring node to ring node in a second direction of tr~n~mi~sion opposite the first direction of tr~n~mis~ion; each of said plurality of ring nodes comprising: means for storing entries identifying communications circuits active in the 5 ring node, a ring node on which each active circuit is termin~ted, as well as, a protection switching indication for each active communications circuit to identify which, if any, of said active communication circuits are to be protection switched;
means for monitoring signals incoming to the ring node to determine whether one or more ring nodes adjacent to this ring node have failed and for determining the identity 10 of said failed one or more ring nodes; and means responsive to said entries, and to said monitoring means for selectively protection switching on a communications circuit-by-communications circuit basis only those communications circuits in this ring node which are to be protected thereby leaving selected bandwidth in said ring tr~nsmi.~.sion system unprotected.
In accordance with yet another aspect of the present invention there is provideda bidirectional ring tr~n~mi~sion system including: a plurality of ring nodes; a first tr~n.~mis~ion path interconnecting said plurality of ring nodes and transportingcommuIlications circuits around the ring tr~n~mi~.~ion system from ring node to ring node in a first direction of tr~n~mi~ion; a second tr~n~mi~.cion path interconnecting 20 said plurality of ring nodes and transporting communications circuits around the ring tr~n~mis~ion system from ring node to ring node in a second direction of tr~n~mis~ion opposite the first direction of tr~n~mi~ion; a method of protection switching only communications circuits to be protected comprising the steps of: provisioning in each of said plurality of ring nodes entries identifying communications circuits active in the 25 ring node, a ring node on which each active circuit is termin~ted, as well as, a protection switching indication for each active communications circuit to identify which, if any, of said active communication circuits are to be protection switched;
monitoring signals incoming to the ring node to determine whether one or more ring nodes adjacent to this ring node have failed; determinin~ the identity of said failed one 30 or more ring nodes; and determining in response to said entries which, if any, of said active communications circuits in the ring node are termin~te~l in said failed one or more ring nodes; and selectively protection switching on a communications - 2b -circuit-by-communications circuit basis in response to said entries only those communications circuits in this ring node which are to be protected thereby leaving selected bandwidth in said ring tr~n~mi~ion system unprotected.
In accordance with still yet another aspect of the present invention there is provided a method for use in a bidirectional ring tr~n~mi~ion system having a plurality of ring nodes interconnected by first and second tr~n~mi~ion paths which transport comlllullications circuits around the ring tr:~n~mi~ion system in respective, opposite directions, the method comprising the steps of: storing for each of individual ones, but less than all, of the communications circuits active in a particular one of the ring nodes an indication that communications circuit is to be protection switched; and upon the failure of a ring node which is adjacent to said particular ring node and which termin~tes a communications circuit that is active in said particular ring node,protection switching that communications circuit if a protection switching indication is stored therefor and leaving that communications circuit non-protection-switched 1 5 otherwise.
Brief Description of the Dr~wil~gs FIG. 1 shows, in simplified block diagram form, a ring tr~n~mi~.~ion system;
FIG. 2 shows, in simplified block diagram form, details of a ring node;
FIG. 3 shows, in simplified block diagram form, details of a squelcher used in the ring node of FIG. 2;
FIG. 4 shows, in simplified block diagram form, details of an AIS insert unit employed in the squelcher of FIG. 3;
FIG. 5 is an exemplary ring node ID table included in memory of the controller of FIG. 2;
FIG. 6 is an exemplary communications circuit ID table also included in memory of the controller of FIG. 2 for ring node 104;
FIG. 7 is another exemplary communications circuit ID table also included in memory of the controller of FIG. 2 for ring node 104;
FIG. 8 is a flow chart illustrating the switching and possible squelching operation of the controller of FIG. 2;
FIG. 9 illustrates the failure message trAn~mi.csion for a complete fiber failure in the bidirectional line-switched ring trAn~mi~ion system; and FIG. 10 illustrates the failure message trAn~mi~ion for a single ring node failure in the bidirectional line-switched ring trAn~mi~ion system.
S Detailed Description FIG. 1 shows, in simplified form, a bidirectional ring trAn~mi.~ion system, in this example, bidirectional line-switched ring trAn~mi~ion system 100, which for brevity and clarity of exposition is shown as including only ring nodes 101 through 104. Ring nodes 101 through 104 are interconnected by trAn.~mi~ion 20~72 path 110 in a counter-clockwise direction and by L~ isQi~- path 120 in a clockwise di.t;~ilion. In this eY~mrlP'~ L~n ...i~ :on paths 110 and 120 are CQ- ~p,;~d of optical fibers and each could be co~ Gd of a single optical fiber or two (2) optical fibers. That is, bidi.-,~Lional line-switched ring L- DmiDQi~n system 100 S could be either a two (2) optical fiber or a four (4) optical fiber system. In a two (2) optical fiber system, each of the fibers in L.~ C~ on paths 110 and 120 includesservice bandwidth and protection bandwidth. In a four (4) optical fiber system, each of l~ on paths 110 and 120 includes an optical fiber for service bandwidth and a separate optical fiber for protection band~ . Such bidue~ line-10 s~ hcd ring tr~nQ-miQsion systems are known. ~ this eY~ n~ n of digital signals in the SONET digital signal format is i?QQIlmrtl However, it will be apparent that the invention is equally applicable to other digital signal formats, for e~ample, the CClIT S,~ ullOUS digital hL,.~cl-~ (SDH) digital signal formats. Inthis e~ample, it is assumed that an optical OC-N SONET digital signal fo1mat is 15 being utilized for i --rniQQi(n over trans-~ic~ic-~ paths 110 and 120. The SON~
digital signal format are described in a Technical Advisory entitled "Sy ~,nous Optical Network (SONET) Transport Systems: Con~ n Generic Criteria", TA-NWT-000253, Bell ~ml ~ ~ 'C-'~ Research, Issue 6, S r ber 1990.
It is noted that requests and a~h~o~.lpdg~ p t~ for pl.~~: ~n switch 20 action are trarlsuil~d in an au~m~tir pl. t;n'~ switch (APS) channel in the SONET o~. berl~ accompanying the protection b~~ .;d~ on each of I ~r~ Q;~n paths 110 and 120. The APS channel, in the SONET fo mat, cs~ ..;~s the K1 and K2 bytes in the SONET overhead of the pl. ~,ctior bandwidth. The K1 byte indicates a request of a co~ ;ons circuit for switch action. The first four (4) 25 bits of the K1 byte indicate the switch request priority and the la,st four (4) bits indicale the ring node id~ ;r.~3~i~m (ID). The K2 byte in~lir~tps an achlo~lndg..-P ~l of the requested-protection switch action. The first four (4) bits of the K2 byte indicate the ring node ID and the last 4 bits indicate the action taken. For p~)o~s of this ~Pscrirti l, a "col~ nc circuit" is con~;~e~d to be a SONET STS-3 30 digital signal having its entry and exit points on the ~ing.
Each of ring nodes 101 through 104 co~ s an add-drop m~ rlp~er (ADM~. For generic ~ u~..,enls of a SONET based ADM see the ~echnical Reference entitled "SONET ADD-DROP MultirlPY Flluir.~.el~ (SONET ADM) GENERIC CRITERIA", TR-TSY-000496, Issue 2, S'~r ml~er 1989, Sllppl~ment 1, 35 S~r s~ mber 1991, Bell Communi~tion~ Resear~h. In this eY~rl~, the ADM
operates in a ~ $ion sense to pass signals through the ring node, to add signals - . ~ : ~ .
2(39~S~72 at the ring node, to drop signals at the ring node, to bAdge signals during a pl-~ r~n switch and to loop-baclc-switch signals duAng a ~ro~ ~ ,tio~ switch at the Ang node.
FIG. 2 shows, in ~ plifiPd block diagram form, details of ring nodes 101 through 104, inr~ ng an embodiment of the ,.~ In this example, a S west(W~to-east(E) digital signal I -- ~ direction is assumed in the service bandwidth and the protection bandwidth on transmission path llû. It will be apparent that operation of the ring node and the ADM therein would be similar for an east(E)-to-west(W) digital signal n~n~ c:o.~ ection in the service bandwidth and the plU'f ,,ti~ - bandwidth on tr~,~ s~ - - path 120. Specifi~l1y~ shown is 10 trAn~ on path 110 entering the ring node and supplying an OC-N SONET optical signal to receiver 201, where N could be, for e~nrl~ 12 or 48. Receiver 201 includes an oplical/~,ltchi~,dl (O/E) ~ ~ ce 202 and a dem~ pl t~,r (DEMIJX) 203, which yields at least one (1) STS-M SONET digital signal. Such O/E interfaces and dPm~ll'ip!~-~A~e are known. In this ~ , M is assumed to be three (3) and N
15 is greater than M. In order to ~co---pli~h line-;,..;t~l,..~g in a two optical fiber line~ d ring ~ c~ system, M must be a divisor of N/2. In ~ccoldd~ct with the pl,nc El s of the ~ tion, however, M must be no greater thanthe tributary level which it is desired to path plU ~ion switch. The STS-M signal output from DEMUX 203 is supplied to ~I~Jrl l.. r (S) 204 which, under con~ol of20 controller, 205 controllably ~ lr~ i.e., blocks, particular inromin~
communirations circuits by inserting an alarm ~ signal (AIS), as described below. Details of s~u~Pl~ h~r (S) 204 are shown in FIGs. 3 and 4 and its op~Pr~ on is df sc- ;hed below. Thereafter, the STS-M signal, ~lu~ 1~ hCd or o~ . i~, is supplied to monitor element 230 and to bl~ element 206. Monitor element 230 checks 25 the passing communication circuit signal for con~iition~ such as loss of signal (LOS~
or for parameters such as a bit error rate (BER). Such monitor çl- "P,~1ci are known in the art. A b~oade~l element l.pU ~ ~ the STS-M signal supplied to it and supplies the replicated signals as a plurality of individual outputs. Such l~lv~dc~l elements are known. Bfva~ t element 206 generates three identiral STS-M signals 3û and supplies one STS-M signal to an input of 3:1 selector 207, a second STS-Msignal to an inpu~ of 2:1 selector 208 and a third STS-M signal to an input of 3:1 seleetor 209. An STS-M signal output from 3:1 selector 207 is supplied to s~ r (S) 210, which is identical to sq~,Pl~hf~ (S) 204. SquelchPr (S) 21û is employed, under control of controUer 205, to squelch particular outgoing co~ ons 35 circuits. The STS-M signal output from squelrher (S) 210 is supplied to L~ P~
211 and, therein, to mllltirlpy~pr (MUX) 212. The output of MUX 212 is an elPc~rir~
. :, - .: .
.. ~ :, . ~, '................. . .
'. .
':': ' : ' ,'' .:
2 0 ~ ~3 ~ ~ f~J
OC-N digital signal, which is i.~ . r~- ed to 11 --~missi~ path 110 via electrical/optical (E/O) ~ q r -e 213.
Similarly, in the east(E)-to-west(W) direction an OC-N optical signal is supplied via ~, j,nS....~s or path 120 tO receiver 214 and, therein, to opticall~
S (O/E) ~ ~l r ~e 215. In turn, demll~t~ ey~r (DEMUX) 216 yields a STS-M signal which is supplied via S~I~J~1r~ (S) 217 tO monitor element 231 and then to b~ildcuDl element 218. Broadcslst element 218 Ic~ t~ s the STS-M signal into a plurality of iden~ir~l STS-M signals, in this example, three (3). One STS-M signal is supplied to an input of 3:1 selector 207, a second STS-M signal is supplied to an 10 input of 2:1 selector 208 and a third STS-M signal is supplied to an input of 3:1 selector 209. An output from 3:1 selector 209 is supplied via s.~ - h ~ (S) 219 to transmitter 220. In l-Ar~ 220, multiplexer (MUX) 221 molti~ YPs the STS-M
into an electrical OC-N and, then, clc~,l, ,s"optical (E/O) ~ ~ r 222 supplies the optical OC-N signal to trsn;,.nissiorl path 120.
Controller 205 operates to effect the plo~iv,ol~ed line-switching and d~ ;e squelrhing of c~ ;on~ circuits, or path s ..it~,hmg.
Ad~iiti~ 'ly, as i~ d below, a l~ ion to span-switching of a particuls~r communications circuit can also be realized in a four fiber b~ ional line-s~. '-d ring ~s -mj~ ~ system. Controller 205 co- ~ ni~1rs with ~rceiv~l~ 201 20 smd 214 and ~ .,-s 211 and 2220 via bus 223 and with intP~ce 224 via bus 227. Specific~ly~ controller 205 monitors the i~O...;I~g digital signals to drlr~ ;ne loss-of-signs~l, SONET format K bytes and the like. A-idi~ion~lly, controller 205 causes the ins~ of appropriate K byte .~e5s~aPs for protection v~ hing pw~,ov~s, e~s~mples of which slre desc~ihed below. To realize the desired 25 deterministic squelching of the cs~ ;onQ- circuits, controller 205 is ad~ , p~u,ioned via bus 228 with the i~entitif s (IDS) of all the communi~ions circuits passing through the ring node, as well as those comm.lr --- circuits being added and/or dropped at the ring node and the iden~itip~s of all the ring nodes in bidi~ ional line~ .i~hed ring 100. The 30 s~,Jf ~ g of C5~ nC circuits under control of controller 205 is dPscribed below. Controller 205 co.. ~ ~s with m-~nitors 230 and 231 to compare the health of ~wo copies of an in~omill~ path-s~ l.cd csnlm~ c~tionQ circuit, and then instructv selector 208 to pick the better of the two copies.
T..~. ~ r~~ 224 is employed to interface to a particular duplex link 225 3S and could include any desired a""nE,e n~nt For e~mrl~, in~ fe 224 could include a DS3 digital signal interface to a DSX, an STS-lE (elect~ical) SONFI
.. ~ . , .. . ~ . . .
: . .. . . .
'~ 0 ~ 7 2 digi~l signal ~ E to a DSX, an optical ~h-~ on i,.t.-.ri-~v to an OC-N
SONET optical signal or the like. Such il.~ . r;-~e arrang,e.~v.lb are known.
~pecific~l1y, a signal (R) to be dropped at the ring node is supplied to interface 224 via 2:1 selector 208, under control of controller 205, from either bloddv~l element 5 206 or broadcast element 218. In turn, intPrfa~e 224 supplies the ~y~uyliate signal to duplex link 22S. A signal (I) to be added at the ring node is supp}ied from duplex link 225 to interface 224 where it is co.l~vitvd to the STS-M digital signal format, if necessary. The STS-M digital signal is then supplied to bluadc~l element 226 where it is rcpli ~l~ The le~ ,d STS-M digital signals are supplied by 10 Ifoadcd~l element 226 to an input of 3:1 selector 207 and an input of 3:1 selector 209. In this e~ml~'v~ 3:1 sP1ectors 207 and 209, under control of controller 205, select the signal being added for ~ c~iOn in the service bandwidth or the pr~ ti--bandwidthoneither~ c..~ path110ortr~ npath120.
It should be noted that, in this eY~nlplP, the normal ~ ;C_ ~n path for 15 a digital signal being added at the ring node would be in the service bandwidth on tr~~ ,;on path 120, for e~~~r'~ towards the west (W). The following desçribes the ~lIVCvdlllv for those Cf '~ circuits which are to be line-switched, if there were to be a protection switch. The signal (T) being added from interface 224 would be bridged via ~roadc~l element 226 and chosen by 3:1 selector 207, under 20 control of controller 205, to the plolvvlion bandwidth on ~ r.~--.k~ion path 110.
Similarly, if there were to be a loo~back plu: switch and the ring node was adjacent to the failure, the signal (R) to be dropped at the ring node would be received in the protection bandwidth on li~n;,...icc;Q-~ path 120 and would be switched ~om bl~C~t element 218 via 2:1 selector 208 to intRrf~ce 224. It is 25 noted that "failure" or "ring node failure' as used herein is intended to include node equipment failur and so-called node isolation failurv caused by optical fiber cuts, cable cuts or the like. O~v.~.ise, the signal (R) to be dropped would be switvhed in a ring node adjacent the failure ~om the ~o ~r bandwidth on ll~r~ i -io~ path 120 to the service bandwid~ on l~hrs-~ ion path 110 and received at the nng node30 in usual fashion. Then, the signal (R) being dropped from ~ path 110 is supplied via ~ t element 206 and 2:1 selector 208 to - rfaçe 224.
As indicated above, controller 205 m- ~ ' the status of interface 224 and the digital signal supplied thereto via bus 227. Specifi~l1y, controller 205monitors ;,~t ~r~ ~e 224 for loss-of-signal, coding violations and the like, i.e, a signa1 35 failure csn~liti- n . . - . .
,, . ~ . . . .
.
~ ~ : , ,' .',.,, ~ , . ~ , .
2~99~72 Under control of controller 205, as previously noted, digital signals may be passed through, added at, dropped at, bridged at or loop-back-s~.it~hcd at the ring node. A loop-back-switch of an STS-M digital signal inrom;ng in the service b~-ld~ on i l~ path 110 is effected by controller 205 causing 3:1 5 selector 209 to select the STS-M digital signal from l~ adcd~l element 206 andsupplying it via s~ ' (S) 219 to l.~-~--..;u~. 220. In turn, n~ . 220 supplies an OC-N optical signal to the prc:~ ~n bandwidth on ~ on path 120. It will be apparent that in the loop-back-switch operation, if the signal is iiu~o.~ vp in a service bandwidth on ~ n path 110, it will be loop-back-10 switched to the protection bandwidth on llh~ O~ path 120 and vice versa. ~ thesignal is i~w--~;ng in pr~ n bandwidth on I~ r~l~ path 110, it will be loop-back-s~ l.ed to the service bandwidth on 1~ cr- path 120 and vice versa. A signal to be added at the ring node is supplied from interface 224, nF'i- ~ ~ via blv~adc&~l element 226 and selected either by 3:1 selector 207 or 3:1 15 selector 209, under control of controller 205, to be added on ~ r~ path 110 or 1, --rni.ccir~n path 120~ lvspe.;li.vly. A digital signal to be dropped at the ring node is selected by 2:1 selector 208, under control of controller 205, either ~om bloddrv&sl element 206 (h - ~ ~~i$~ n path 110) or broadcast element 218 (tran~ ;on path 120). The pass-through and loop-back-switch ru~ )r- for a 20 signal in-o...;n~ on ~ ni~;on path 120 is identical to that for an il~ro~ v signal on transnlissioll path 110.
Possible cc ~ r~;r-- circuit ~;~o~ clionc are avoided in b;d ~ tior-' line-switched ring 100 by d t~ ....;n: ~;c~lly ~ ' g c~r~ -- - on.ccircuits to be line-s.. ' -~ that are i ~ -' d in a failed ring node in ring nodes 25 adjacent to the failed ring nodes(s). The adjacent failed ring nodes can include a plurality of nodes i,.~1...li,~g those that appear to be failed because of being isolated by other failed ring nodes or by fiber and/or cable cuts. To Ws end, each ring node in I ',d'r~i- ~~' line-switched ring ~s~ system 100 is typically e~uirped to effect the desired squelching via sq~lelchPr~ (S) 2W, 210, 217 and 219, under con~ol 30 of controller 205. In this ~ , both i~.~o~ g and outgoing communications -circuits are ~ P~ 1, however, it may only be necessa~y to squelch outgoing co..--~ ;one circuits.
FIG. 3 shows, in ~imrlifipd block diagram form, details of an e~emplary sql~PlchPr (S) unit. Sp_cifically, the STS-M digital signal is supplied to 35 demllltirlPYPr (DEMUX) 301 where it is dem~lltip1~YPd into its con~tit~en~ M STS-l digital signals 302-1 through 302-M. The M STS-l digital signals are supplied on a : ' . : : , . ,-; - : : ,.. . ... .. . . .
, . ~ . . : . . . . , ;. . .
2 0 9 ~ ~7 2 one-to-one basis to AIS insert units 303-1 through 303-M. AIS insert units 303-1through 303-M, under control of controller 205, insert AIS in the STS-l digital signals included in the commnnir~irJns circuits, i.e., STS-M digital signals, to be sqne~ Details of AIS insert units 303 are shown in FIG. 4 and described below.
5 The edr~,r, the M STS-l d~igital signals are mu1~ir~ ~Pd in n~ltipl r.qr ~MUX) 304 to yield the desired STS-M digital signal. The details of rn~lltip!~Y schemes for the STS-M digital signal are dPscn'hed in the tP~hnir~l advisory TA-NWT-000253, ,Ç4~ red above.
F~G. 4 shows, in si ~pl;~ed block diagram form, details of AIS insert 10 units 303. Specifically, shown is an STS-l digital signal being supplied to AIS
g~r n- -~tor 401 and to one input of 2:1 selector 402. AIS gen~dtol 401 operates to insert AIS in the STS-l digita'i signal. As in~ d in the t~chnic~l advisory TA-NWT-000253, the STS path AIS is an "all ones" (l's) signal in the STS-l G~
bytes Hl, H2 and H3 and in the bytes of the entire STS SPE (s~ ch~ us payload 15 c~l~"lopc). Selector 402 selects as an output, under control of controller 205, eit'ner the ' --, ~ing STS-l digital signal or the STS-l digital signal with AIS inserted from AIS ~r ~ or 401.
FIG. S is a table ir~1u(1ing the j(~entiqC '- (ID) of ring nodes 101 through 104. The ring node IDs are stored in a look-up table which is provisioned 20 via 228 in memory of controller 205. As L~d;: ~~d above, the ring node lI)s are 4 bit words and are included in the second 4 bits of the Kl bytes and the first 4 bits of tne K2 bytes in the APS channel.
FIG. 6 is il~ dti~V of a table in~ inD the i~entific~tion of all the active communications circuits in a ring node, in this ~ rl~ ring node 104, for a 25 counter~locl~-.ise co~ n through nodes 101 through 104 (FIG. 1). The active comm. ~ ~ ~ - circuits include those being added, being dropped or passing through ring nodb 104. The table inrlu(li~ the IDs of the active co.. ~ ir~;on~
circuits in the ring QOde are l~lu.i;~ioned via input 228 in a look-up table in memory ~of controller 205. Shown in the table of FIG. 6 are (a) the STS-M co--.~ tion~
30 circuit t~l~hçr.~ (#) b through f; (b) an idp~l;rl~a~;on of the ring node which includes the com.~ tion~ circuit entry point, i.e., the A It~""i~ ~ jon for the communications circuit; and (c) an idc ~lific ~;OI- of the ring node which includes the communications circuit exit point, i.e., the Z le~ otirn for the c--- - or~
circui~ Thus, ~e ~ _ ~ion~ circuit ID table of FIG. S, shows that STS-M(b) 35 enters ring 100 at ring node 104 and exits at ring node 102; STS-M(c) enters ring 100 at ring node 103 and exits a~ ring node 101; STS-M(d) enters ring 100 at ring ., . ~ .................... ~ . . . .: . . -- . .. . ., ... : . ~
~ 0 ~ 2 g node 102 and e~its at ring node 101; STS-M(e) enters ring 100 at ring node 103 and exits at ring node 102; and STS-M(f) enters ring 100 at ring node 103 and e~its at ring node 104. Although the ring nodes drcigJlqted ac A le~ ;nnc are consid~ed entry points and the ring nodes dç~igr- -~ as Z t~ are considered exit S points, it will be apparent that the individual co~.n~nn;~ ~;ons circuits may be duplex circuits having both entry and exit points at each such node. It should be noted that hel~t~,folG all Colnm ~ ~Jionc circuits would be line-v.. ~-~ but now it is possible to line-switch a subset of the co~ fi- ~I;nnc circuits nd to path-switch anothersubset of the co~ ~r~ k~tinnc circuits, as desired. Thus, as shown in FIG. 6, STS-10 M(b), STS-M(c) and STS-M(d) are provisioned, to be line-s..ilcLcd and STS-M(e) and STS-M(f~ are prov;v;olled to be path-switched.
Also e~ro~--p~s~Pd is Uhe capability of leaving a subset of the cc~ - circuits unprc ~t~d And in a four optical fiber bidirectional line-switch ring 1., rL ..i~;o-- system, it is now also possible to specify whether span-15 s..ilching of co-~ flon.c circuits will be employed or not. These conrept~ are illustrated in FIG. 7 which, is illu;~h~. ive of another e~Pmp'~ ~ table in~luAing the i~c-~ r of all the active co-....~J~irS~;ons circuits in ring node 104, for counter-clockwise cQmm---~- on through ring nodes 101 through 104.
SpecJfir~ly, FIG. 7 illustrates how unprotected or span-switched cc.--....-~-~ications 20 circuits are provisioned via input 228 in a look-up table in memory of controller 205 (FIG. 2) in a four fiber ring tr~s~ sion system. Comm--- -- onc circuit~c (STS-M(b) through STS-M(f) are provisioned as shown in FIG. 6 and descrihed above.
Cor~mur ~ ~~nc circuit STS-M(g) is span-s..il4hed only, and co ..~.v ~ir~ >nc circuit STS-M~h) is unprotected.
25FIG. 8 is a flow chart i~ ;,hdliilg the o~ _ ~ of controller 205 in controlling the ~F~ ~r of the ring nodes in order to effect the provisioned (and the d~ l;r squelrhilu~, if ncccssa,~) of comn~llnir~~ nc circuits in the pll,~nce of a failure. ~pecifir~lly~ ~e process is entered via step 801.
Then, opr~t~ 1 block 802 cau es the K bytes of an inCQming OC-N signal to be 30 obs,.~_d and pl~eS3eS the ring node IDs therein. Then, coln~ )nsl branch point 8Q3 tests to ~ t~.. ;.~f if the p,vcessed ring node IDs indicate that one or more ring nodes have failed. Again, a ring node failure is defined as to include node e~lù;p~r ..l failure and so-called node isolation failure caused by fiber cuts and the like. Specific e~amples of failure con~litionc are ~;c- I~,~s~d below. If the plocessed ring node IDs 35 indicate no ring node failure, the failure is other than a ring node failure and control is passed to operational block 804. Similarly, if steip 803 ir~icaPs a single ring node , - - ~ -- ~ , , ~
- , ,.. ~ , ~ , . . .
' ' : ' . , . ', ; ' , 209~72 failure, the failed ring node ID is already known and control is also passed directly to step 804. If the p/oces~d ring node IDs indicate a multiple ring node failure, operational block 805 cau~s the failed ring node IDs to be obtained from the ring node ID look-up table in memory (~G. 5). Then, as in the other two in~t~eS~
S control is passed to opPrs~iC--l block 804. O~ -1 block 804 causes the identity (ID) of the affected com~ ;onc circuits to be obtained - whether or not any particular such cc_ - '--'--- circuit is to be line-,~ l.cd (or possibly ~quelched), and if not line-switched, whether or not it is to be path-s.. ~c~ -d, and if not path~ hed, whether or not it is to be span-switched from the co~ irations 10 circuit ID look-up table (E:IG. 7) in memory of controller 205 (FIG. 2). Once the affected cc~ ;onQ circuits are idpntifi~ co~litio~s1 branch points 806, 810 and 812 separate the control process depe~ding upon whe~er the affected individual co-- -- ' ations circuit should be line-s..i~ c~r not, should be path s..;~hed or not, or-should span-b.. ;~l.ed or not. It should be noted that if the co.. -~
15 circuit is not line-;,..itchcd, path-switched or span~ ,hcd, it is left ~n~lo~ - .. It will be apparent to those skilled in the a~t that the individual affected c~ m '- - -- circuits can be arranged into ~ub~ r s of comm~ bl;O-~c circuits to be either line-;,~ ihcd, path-switched, span~ -d only or not switched, i.e., left UII~ ,' _' ' If the co~ ications circuit is to be line-~ hed, as d~ ;n~d 20 in step 806, operational block 807 causes, if nc~ssal~, the a~ ~ ones of (S) 204, 210, 217 and 219 (FIG. 2), in this eY2mrle, to squelch those i-4ntified com.--ur a '~--- circuits in the ring node. As ~ 1;r~ted above, all line-hc~ com~unications circuits active in this ring node that are terminated in afailed ring node are s~luel~hed Opersltir -1 block 808 IIIeI~JPOI1 causes the line-25 switehed communica~ons circuits not ~",;l~t d in the failed ring node(s) to bebridged and b.. ~' ~-;1 to "heal" the ring. ThGl~art~., the process is ended in step 809.
If a communications circuit is to be path-s~.it ,hed, as d~ t~ n~d in steps 806 and 810, operational block 811 co~.p~-~,s, via monitor~ 230 and 231 (FIG. 2), the relative health of the two copies of the particular c-~mrn ~ir~tion~ circuit, and engages30 path-switching in selector 208 (FIG. 2), if a~ u~,liate. Thereafter, the process is ended in step 809. If the affected co--.~ ;~n~ circuit is not to be ei~er line-s~ d or path-switched as d~t -.~ d in steps 806 and 810, conditi~n~l branch point 812 tests to d~ b -,,,;nr whether or not the commnni~-t --- circuit is to be span~ chcd. If the affected co~ P~ion~ circuit is to be span-s-. ,hc~.
35 ope~tio~l block 814 effects the span-s~it~hing as applu~Jl;at,. Thereafter, the process is ended in step 809. Again, if the affected comm-lnic~ti-)n~ circuit is to be : . , - .:- : . .
. . .
2~9~972 Ieft unprotected as d~ t ....;.~rd in steps 806, 810 and 812 the process is ended in step 809.
FIG. 9 i~ tr~ps the failure message l~r~-"~ in the ~J!o~ c prote~cti~n switch (APS) channel Kl bytes for a tt~ pa~th failure in S b~ P,cfion~ line-switched ring lO0. In this ~ ~le the failure is shown as being in tr~ paths 110 and 120 between ring nodes 101 and 102. Ring node 101 detects loss-of-signal from ring node 102 on i~o-~ Qo;~n path 120. Loss-of-signal as used herein is intended to include other ;-~d:c ~ such as loss-of-frame, high bit error rate or the like. Then, ring node 101 l..~ a line-switch request 10 message idenlirying the signal from ring node 102 as having failed. Speçifi~ ~1ly~ the line-switch request n~Cc~ges are ~ td in the APS channel Kl byte on tran; ~ ~ ~ - - path 120 away from the failure toward ring node 104. This line-switch request message is designated SFL/102. Ring node 101 also 1, -n~it.~ a span-switch request message in the APS charmel Kl byte on ~. r~",j ~:on path 110 towards the15 failure. The spa- v..i~h request message is de-~ SFS/102. It should be noted, h~ f, that a span-switch request is only issued and can only be realized in a four (4) fiber bidirectional line-s..;b~hed ring traln- ;cc~ system 100. Ring node 104 .COg~ S that the line-switch request message SFL/102 in the ~ ro-~ g APS
channel Kl byte does not identify an adjacent ring node and passes the line-switch 20 request message on to ring node 103. Similarly, ring node 103 passes the line-switch request message on to ring node 102. In turn, ring node 102 recog~i~Ps its own ID in the SFL/102 line-switch request message, which ~ '~ s to Ang node 102 that a Ang node has not failed. Since there was no ring node failure, there is no need to squeleh any of the comm -- ic~;o ~ eireuits aetive in ring node 102. Ring node 102 25 doev, ~ , effeet a loop-back-switch of line-switched co~ ;o.-~ circuits d at the ~ing node in the service ~- - h.;JIh on ~ ..ki;n~ path 120 to the pro~ion bandwidth on tran., ~s ~ path 110 for con~ n;cations circuits intended for other ring nodes in nng 100. Ring node 102 also effects a ring loop-back-switch of line-v.. it~,hcd communications cireuits entering the node that were intended to be 30 tra l~ ~itted in the service bandwidth on ~ -.ic~:or path 120 to the protection band~ndth on l~r~ ciol~ path 110. Any co-- .~. ~;e~tiltr~ circuits received at ring node 102 that are intended to be dropped from either the service bandwidth or pro~.:lio.l bandwidth on lli.h~ ion path 120, are supplied to ' ~ e 224 (FIG.
2), under control of controller 205, as de~s~ribed above. Any ca-- -a~c-~
35 circuits to be path-switched alre path-switched at their l- ....in~ion Ang nodes if the cw~ent path selection~ are affected by the failure.
~ , :, . .; :
.. -,- -, . ~ . , . :~ , ... .
'2~3~7~
Similarly, ring node 102 detects a loss-of-signal from ring node 101 on on path 110 because of the failure in trarls--~ on paths 110 and 120 between ring nodes 101 and 102. Then, ring node 102 ~ a line-switch request message ide.~ .ng the signal from ring node 101 as having failed in the S APS channel Kl byte on ~ --.ics:on path 110. This line-switch request message is de-s-igr ~ SFL/101. Ring node 102 also i~ s a span-switch request message in the APS channel Kl byte on i 1~-miQ~;on path 120 towards the failure. The span-switch request message is d~P~igratPd SFS/101. Again, it should be noted that a span-switch request is only issued and can only be realized in a four (4) fiber 10 bidh.,~,Lional line-~ ring ~ system 100. Ring node 103 1~co~:, s that the line-switch request SFL/101 in the i~o--~ g APS channel Kl byte does not identify an adjacent ring node and pa~es the line-switch request message on to ring node 104. Similarly, ring node 104 passes the line-switch request message on to ring node 101. In turn, ring node 101 rec~ni7Ps its own ID in tbe SFL/101 line-switch15 request ~s~ which: ~ ,r to rhlg node 101 that a ring node has not failed.
Since there was no ring node failure, there is no need to squelch any of the co--..n. ~ ;o~ circuits active in ring node 101. Ring node 101 does, however, effect a loop-back-switch of line-s..;t~hed co~ circuits received at the ring node in the service bandwidth on transmission path 110 to the protection 20 bandwidth on t.,~ path 120 for c - ~ ' - a ~nr circuits intended for other ring nodes in ring 100. Ring node 101 effects a ring loop-back-switch of line-s~ t cc ~ ~ circuits entering the node that were intended to be d in the service band~.idlll on trans-~ on path 110 to the pl()~ ~-bdl-d..;.ll}l on tran~ ;o~ path 120. Any co~ v~;r l~;O"5 circuits received at ring 25 node 101 that are intended to be dropped from either the service bandwidth or- - bandwidth on l.~n-.ni~ path 110, are supplied as dPQcrihed above, under control of-controller 205 to in~ e 224 (FIG. 2). Any c- -- ~ ~ on~
circuits t~ be p~th-switched are path-switched at their ~ ~ ~ir ~ ring nodes if the cu~ent path Q~PIçctionQ are affected by the failure.
FIG. 10 iil~QtratP5 the failure message ~ 5;r~n in the a~tr~n~qti~
~l'O -~ - switch (APS) channel via the Kl byte for a single ring node failure inql line-s..;tehed ring 100. Tn this-example, the failure is shown as being in ring node 101. Ring node 102 detects a loss-of-signal from ring node 101 on tr~ o-Qio~ path 110 because of the failure of node 101. Then, ring node 102 35 ~ -o~ .o~ a line-swit~h request message ide-llilying the signal from ring node 101 as having failed in ~he APS channel Kl byte on ~ o~- path 110 away from ~e .
~, -: - :
20~72 failllre toward ring node 103. This line-switch request signal is decigrqt~d SFL/101.
Ring node 102 also l"~r ~ a span-switch request message from the APS channel Kl byte on L~ paths 120 towards failed node 101. The span-switch request message is ~esigr- i SFs/lOl. AS in(~ic ~ ~ above, a span-switch is only5 issued and can only be realized in a four (4) fiber b J~ -l line-~ ring L~ ;on system 100. Ring node 103 recognizes that the line-switch request message SFL/101 in the i~lco~;ng APS channel Kl byte does not identify an adjacent ring node and, Ih~,.er~3lG, passes the line-switch request message on to ring node 104. Ring node 104 lecGgl~i~s that the line-switch request message SFL/101 10 includes the ID of the adjacent failed ring node 101. A single node failure is indjC '~,d because ring node 104 has also detected loss-of-signal from ring node 101 on ll~n~ on path 120. CO~ eQI1Y~ ring node 104, under control of controller 205 (FIG. 2), causes all active line-;,..i~hed co~ ;r~l;on~ circuits in ring node 104 intended for ring node 101 to be ~ hed The Qquel'~hin~ iS realized as 15 ~-i~d above in conjunction with FIG. 2 and the process of FIG. 8. Specific~l1y, ~cÇc.ling to the co-~ ,t;onc circuit ID table for ring node 104 in FIG. 6 or F~G.
7, it is seen that cor.. v~ s~i-)nc circuits STS-M (c) and STS-M (d) are to be lrh.o(1 Lh~e-s~ CO~ C circuit STS-M (b) is identified as not being t~ ted in ring node 101 and, Ihc~cro.~ no squelrhing is effected for it.
20 Thus, co~ a - l~ circuit STS-M(b) is ring loop-back-switched in ring node 104to the protection bandwidth on l.i nc...;cci,~n path 120 and supplied thereon to ring node 102 where it is ~ o~, ;at~ly dropped, in the manner ~esrrihed above. Path-switched co------~ r ~;r.~c circuits STS-M(e) and STS-M(f) are path-switched at their terminations if the current path splr~l;onc are affected by the failure of ring 25 node 101. Co~ mications circuit STS-M(f) is not affected by the failure of node 101 and com~ orn between ring nodes 103 and 104 are realized in normal fashio~
As inr~ d above, ring node 104 detects a loss-of-signal on ein~ path 120 from failed ring node 101. Then, ring node 104 transmits a 30 line-switch request message idenliryil~g the signal firom ring node 101 as having failed in the APS channel Kl byte on h -en~i~ci~r path 120 away from the failuretoward nng node 103. Again, this line-switch request message is ~ecign ~
E~LL/101. Ring node 104 also ~ i~ a span-switch request message in the APS
channel Kl byte on ~ ...i.c.~;on path 110 towards the failed node 101. The span-35 switch request message is ~esign ~ SFS/101. As in~ at~d above, a span-switch can only be realized in a four (4) fiber bid.~ ional line-switched ring ~ ...i.c~ n .: - ... . .
2G99~7~
system 100. Ring node 103 recognizes that the line-switch request SFL/101 i~co~ in the APS channel on l.rr~ in~ path 120 does not identify an adjacent failed node and passes the line-switch request me~ssage on to ring node 102. Ring node 102 recognizes that the line-switch request message includes the ID of an S adjacent failed ring node, namely, ring node 101. A single ring node failure is a ~ because ring node 102 has detected loss-of-signal from Ang node 101 and has received a line-switch request message idenli~ing node 101 as having failed.Conc~ve~ ~Iy~ ring node 102 will squelch all active line-sw ~-hPd c~ ;onc circuits ~ ~ ~e d for ring node 101. Line-switched communications circuits 10 terminated in others of the ring nodes in ring 100 are lp~ ~Ipliat~ bridged and loop-back- ~..itihed as required to "heal" the ring 100. As indicated above, CC'-~ J'- _"O"Q circuits to be path-~..;~l.ed are path-~ d at their t~ ;or ring nodes if the current path ~PlPctionC are affected by the failure.
- . ... :- ..... .. : ~. . . . . . - .
.
~ : . . : , . . ~, , . . ~ . .. ,. ~
Claims (40)
1. A ring node for use in a bidirectional ring transmission system having a plurality of ring nodes interconnected by first and second transmission paths, the first transmission path transporting communication circuits around the ring transmission system from ring node to ring node in a first direction and the second transmission path transporting communications circuits around the ring transmission system from ring node to ring node in a second direction opposite the first direction, the ring node comprising:
means for storing entries identifying communications circuits active in the ring node, a ring node on which each active circuit is terminated, as well as, a protection switching indication for each active communications circuit to identify which, if any, of said active communication circuits are to be protection switched;
means for monitoring signals incoming to the ring node to determine whether one or more ring nodes adjacent to this ring node have failed and for determining the identity of said failed one or more ring nodes; and means responsive to said entries, and to said monitoring means for selectively protection switching on a communications circuit-by-communications circuit basis only those communications circuits in this ring node which are to be protected thereby leaving selected bandwidth in said ring transmission system unprotected.
means for storing entries identifying communications circuits active in the ring node, a ring node on which each active circuit is terminated, as well as, a protection switching indication for each active communications circuit to identify which, if any, of said active communication circuits are to be protection switched;
means for monitoring signals incoming to the ring node to determine whether one or more ring nodes adjacent to this ring node have failed and for determining the identity of said failed one or more ring nodes; and means responsive to said entries, and to said monitoring means for selectively protection switching on a communications circuit-by-communications circuit basis only those communications circuits in this ring node which are to be protected thereby leaving selected bandwidth in said ring transmission system unprotected.
2. The invention as defined in claim 1 wherein said bidirectional ring transmission system includes four (4) optical fibers two (2) of said optical fibers being employed for said first transmission path and two (2) of said optical fibers being employed for said second transmission path, said protection switching indicationindicates whether a particular affected communications circuit should be line-switched or span-switched, and said means for protection switching is further responsive to said protection switching indication to either line-switch or span-switch said particular affected communications circuit as indicated by said protection switching indication.
3. The invention as defined in claim 1 wherein said protection switching indication indicates whether a particular affected communications circuit should be line-switched or not switched at all, i.e., left unprotected, and wherein said means for protection switching is further responsive to said protection switching indication to either line-switch or not switch, i.e., leave unprotected, said particular affected communications circuit as indicated by said protection switching indication.
4. The invention as defined in claim 3 wherein said bidirectional ring transmission system includes four (4) optical fibers two (2) of said optical fibers being employed for said first transmission path and two (2) of said optical fibers being employed for said second transmission path, and wherein said protection switching indication further indicates whether a particular affected communications circuit should be span-switched only, and wherein said means for protection switching is further responsive to said protection switching indication to either line-switch, span-switch or not switch at all, i.e., leave unprotected, said particular affected communications circuit as indicated by said protection switching indication.
5. The invention as defined in claim 1 wherein said protection switching indication indicates whether a particular affected communications circuit should be line-switched or path-switched, and wherein said means for protection switching is further responsive to said protection switching indication to either line-switch or path-switch said particular affected communications circuit as indicated by said protection switching indication.
6. The invention as defined in claim 5 wherein said bidirectional ring transmission system includes four (4) optical fibers two (2) of said optical fibers being employed for said first transmission path and two (2) of said optical fibers being employed for said second transmission path, and wherein said protection switching indication further indicates whether a particular affected communications circuit should be span-switched only, and wherein said means for protection switching is further responsive to said protection switching indication to either line-switch, path-switch or span-switch said particular affected communications circuit as indicated by saidprotection switching indication.
7. The invention as defined in claim 5 wherein said protection switching indication further indicates whether a particular affected communications circuit should not be switched at all, i.e., left unprotected, and wherein said means for protection switching is further responsive to said protection switching indication to either line-switch, path-switch or not switch at all, i.e., leave unprotected, said particular affected communications circuit as indicated by said protection switching indication.
8. The invention as defined in claim 7 wherein said bidirectional ring transmission system includes four (4) optical fibers two (2) of said optical fibers being employed for said first transmission path and two (2) of said optical fibers being employed for said second transmission path, wherein said protection switching indication further indicates whether a particular affected communications circuit should be span-switched only, and wherein said means for protection switching is further responsive to said protection switching indication to either line-switch, path-switch, span-switch or not switch at all, i.e., leave unprotected, said particular affected communications circuit as indicated by said protection switching indication.
9. The invention as defined in claim 1 wherein said bidirectional ring transmission system includes four (4) optical fibers two (2) of said optical fibers being employed for said first transmission path and two (2) of said optical fibers being employed for said second transmission path, said protection switching indicationindicates whether a particular affected communications circuit should be path-switched or span-switched, and said means for protection switching is further responsive to said protection switching indication to either path-switch or span-switch said particular affected communications circuit as indicated by said protection switching indication.
10. The invention as defined in claim 1 wherein said bidirectional ring transmission system includes four (4) optical fibers two (2) of said optical fibers being employed for said first transmission path and two (2) of said optical fibers being employed for said second transmission path, and wherein said protection switching indication further indicates whether a particular affected communications circuit should be span-switched or not switched at all, i.e., left unprotected, and wherein said means for protection switching is further responsive to said protection switching indication to either span-switch or not switch at all, i.e., leave unprotected, said particular affected communications circuit as indicated by said protection switching indication.
11. The invention as defined in claim 1 wherein said protection switching indication indicates whether a particular affected communications circuit should be path-switched or not switched at all, i.e., left unprotected, and wherein said means for protection switching is further responsive to said protection switching indication to either path-switch or not switch, i.e., leave unprotected, said particular affected communications circuit as indicated by said protection switching indication.
12. The invention as defined in claim 11 wherein said bidirectional ring transmission system includes four (4) optical fibers two (2) of said optical fibers being employed for said first transmission path and two (2) of said optical fibers being employed for said second transmission path, wherein said protection switching indication further indicates whether a particular affected communications circuit should be span-switched, and wherein said means for protection switching is further responsive to said protection switching indication to either, path-switch, span-switch or not switch at all, i.e., leave unprotected, said particular affected communications circuit as indicated by said protection switching indication.
13. A bidirectional ring transmission system including:
a plurality of ring nodes;
a first transmission path interconnecting said plurality of ring nodes and transporting communications circuits around the ring transmission system from ring node to ring node in a first direction of transmission;
a second transmission path interconnecting said plurality of ring nodes and transporting communications circuits around the ring transmission system from ring node to ring node in a second direction of transmission opposite the first direction of transmission;
each of said plurality of ring nodes comprising:
means for storing entries identifying communications circuits active in the ring node, a ring node on which each active circuit is terminated, as well as, a protection switching indication for each active communications circuit to identify which, if any, of said active communication circuits are to be protection switched;
means for monitoring signals incoming to the ring node to determine whether one or more ring nodes adjacent to this ring node have failed and for determining the identity of said failed one or more ring nodes; and means responsive to said entries, and to said monitoring means for selectively protection switching on a communications circuit-by-communications circuit basis only those communications circuits in this ring node which are to be protected thereby leaving selected bandwidth in said ring transmission system unprotected.
a plurality of ring nodes;
a first transmission path interconnecting said plurality of ring nodes and transporting communications circuits around the ring transmission system from ring node to ring node in a first direction of transmission;
a second transmission path interconnecting said plurality of ring nodes and transporting communications circuits around the ring transmission system from ring node to ring node in a second direction of transmission opposite the first direction of transmission;
each of said plurality of ring nodes comprising:
means for storing entries identifying communications circuits active in the ring node, a ring node on which each active circuit is terminated, as well as, a protection switching indication for each active communications circuit to identify which, if any, of said active communication circuits are to be protection switched;
means for monitoring signals incoming to the ring node to determine whether one or more ring nodes adjacent to this ring node have failed and for determining the identity of said failed one or more ring nodes; and means responsive to said entries, and to said monitoring means for selectively protection switching on a communications circuit-by-communications circuit basis only those communications circuits in this ring node which are to be protected thereby leaving selected bandwidth in said ring transmission system unprotected.
14. The invention as defined in claim 13 wherein said bidirectional ring transmission system includes four (4) optical fibers two (2) of said optical fibers being employed for said first transmission path and two (2) of said optical fibers being employed for said second transmission path, said protection switching indicationindicates whether a particular affected communications circuit should be line-switched or span-switched, and said means for protection switching is further responsive to said protection switching indication to either line-switch or span-switch said particular affected communications circuit as indicated by said protection switching indication.
15. The invention as defined in claim 13 wherein said protection switching indication indicates whether a particular affected communications circuit should be line-switched or not switched at all, i.e., left unprotected, and wherein said means for protection switching is further responsive to said protection switching indication to either line-switch or not switch, i.e., leave unprotected, said particular affected communications circuit as indicated by said protection switching indication.
16. The invention as defined in claim 15 wherein said bidirectional ring transmission system includes four (4) optical fibers two (2) of said optical fibers being employed for said first transmission path and two (2) of said optical fibers being employed for said second transmission path, and wherein said protection switching indication further indicates whether a particular affected communications circuit should be span-switched only, and wherein said means for protection switching is further responsive to said protection switching indication to either line-switch, span-switch or not switch at all, i.e., leave unprotected, said particular affected communications circuit as indicated by said protection switching indication.
17. The invention as defined in claim 13 wherein said protection switching indication indicates whether a particular affected communications circuit should be line-switched or path-switched, and wherein said means for protection switching is further responsive to said protection switching indication to either line-switch or path-switch said particular affected communications circuit as indicated by said protection switching indication.
18. The invention as defined in claim 17 wherein said bidirectional ring transmission system includes four (4) optical fibers two (2) of said optical fibers being employed for said first transmission path and two (2) of said optical fibers being employed for said second transmission path, and wherein said protection switching indication further indicates whether a particular affected communications circuit should be span-switched only, and wherein said means for protection switching is further responsive to said protection switching indication to either line-switch, path-switch or span-switch said particular affected communications circuit as indicated by saidprotection switching indication.
19. The invention as defined in claim 17 wherein said protection switching indication further indicates whether a particular affected communications circuit should not be switched at all, i.e., left unprotected, and wherein said means for protection switching is further responsive to said protection switching indication to either line-switch, path-switch or not switch at all, i.e., leave unprotected, said particular affected communications circuit as indicated by said protection switching indication.
20. The invention as defined in claim 19 wherein said bidirectional ring transmission system includes four (4) optical fibers two (2) of said optical fibers being employed for said first transmission path and two (2) of said optical fibers being employed for said second transmission path, wherein said protection switching indication further indicates whether a particular affected communications circuit should be span-switched only, and wherein said means for protection switching is further responsive to said protection switching indication to either line-switch, path-switch, span-switch or not switch at all, i.e., leave unprotected, said particular affected communications circuit as indicated by said protection switching indication.
21. The invention as defined in claim 13 wherein said bidirectional ring transmission system includes four (4) optical fibers two (2) of said optical fibers being employed for said first transmission path and two (2) of said optical fibers being employed for said second transmission path, said protection switching indicationindicates whether a particular affected communications circuit should be path-switched or span-switched, and said means for protection switching is further responsive to said protection switching indication to either path-switch or span-switch said particular affected communications circuit as indicated by said protection switching indication.
22. The invention as defined in claim 13 wherein said bidirectional ring transmission system includes four (4) optical fibers two (2) of said optical fibers being employed for said first transmission path and two (2) of said optical fibers being employed for said second transmission path, and wherein said protection switching indication further indicates whether a particular affected communications circuit should be span-switched or not switched at all, i.e., left unprotected, and wherein said means for protection switching is further responsive to said protection switching indication to either span-switch or not switch at all, i.e., leave unprotected, said particular affected communications circuit as indicated by said protection switching indication.
23. The invention as defined in claim 13 wherein said protection switching indication indicates whether a particular affected communications circuit should be path-switched or not switched at all, i.e., left unprotected, and wherein said means for protection switching is further responsive to said protection switching indication to either path-switch or not switch, i.e., leave unprotected, said particular affected communications circuit as indicated by said protection switching indication.
24. The invention as defined in claim 23 wherein said bidirectional ring transmission system includes four (4) optical fibers two (2) of said optical fibers being employed for said first transmission path and two (2) of said optical fibers being employed for said second transmission path, wherein said protection switching indication further indicates whether a particular affected communications circuit should be span-switched, and wherein said means for protection switching is further responsive to said protection switching indication to either, path-switch, span-switch or not switch at all, i.e., leave unprotected, said particular affected communications circuit as indicated by said protection switching indication.
25. A bidirectional ring transmission system including:
a plurality of ring nodes;
a first transmission path interconnecting said plurality of ring nodes and transporting communications circuits around the ring transmission system from ring node to ring node in a first direction of transmission;
a second transmission path interconnecting said plurality of ring nodes and transporting communications circuits around the ring transmission system from ring node to ring node in a second direction of transmission opposite the first direction of transmission;
a method of protection switching only communications circuits to be protected comprising the steps of:
provisioning in each of said plurality of ring nodes entries identifying communications circuits active in the ring node, a ring node on which each active circuit is terminated, as well as, a protection switching indication for each active communications circuit to identify which, if any, of said active communication circuits are to be protection switched;
monitoring signals incoming to the ring node to determine whether one or more ring nodes adjacent to this ring node have failed;
determining the identity of said failed one or more ring nodes; and determining in response to said entries which, if any, of said active communications circuits in the ring node are terminated in said failed one or more ring nodes; and selectively protection switching on a communications circuit-by-communications circuit basis in response to said entries only those communications circuits in this ring node which are to be protected thereby leaving selected bandwidth in said ring transmission system unprotected.
a plurality of ring nodes;
a first transmission path interconnecting said plurality of ring nodes and transporting communications circuits around the ring transmission system from ring node to ring node in a first direction of transmission;
a second transmission path interconnecting said plurality of ring nodes and transporting communications circuits around the ring transmission system from ring node to ring node in a second direction of transmission opposite the first direction of transmission;
a method of protection switching only communications circuits to be protected comprising the steps of:
provisioning in each of said plurality of ring nodes entries identifying communications circuits active in the ring node, a ring node on which each active circuit is terminated, as well as, a protection switching indication for each active communications circuit to identify which, if any, of said active communication circuits are to be protection switched;
monitoring signals incoming to the ring node to determine whether one or more ring nodes adjacent to this ring node have failed;
determining the identity of said failed one or more ring nodes; and determining in response to said entries which, if any, of said active communications circuits in the ring node are terminated in said failed one or more ring nodes; and selectively protection switching on a communications circuit-by-communications circuit basis in response to said entries only those communications circuits in this ring node which are to be protected thereby leaving selected bandwidth in said ring transmission system unprotected.
26. The invention as defined in claim 25 wherein said bidirectional ring transmission system includes four (4) optical fibers two (2) of said optical fibers being employed for said first transmission path and two (2) of said optical fibers being employed for said second transmission path, said protection switching indicationindicates whether a particular affected communications circuit should be line-switched or span-switched, and said step of protection switching is further responsive to said protection switching indication to either line-switch or span-switch said particular affected communications circuit as indicated by said protection switching indication.
27. The invention as defined in claim 25 wherein said protection switching indication indicates whether a particular affected communications circuit should be line-switched or not switched at all, i.e., left unprotected, and wherein said step of protection switching is further responsive to said protection switching indication to either line-switch or not switch, i.e., leave unprotected, said particular affected communications circuit as indicated by said protection switching indication.
28. The invention as defined in claim 27 wherein said bidirectional ring transmission system includes four (4) optical fibers two (2) of said optical fibers being employed for said first transmission path and two (2) of said optical fibers being employed for said second transmission path, wherein said protection switching indication further indicates whether a particular affected communications circuit should be span-switched only, and wherein said step of protection switching is further responsive to said protection switching indication to either line-switch, span-switch or not switch at all, i.e., leave unprotected, said particular affected communications circuit as indicated by said protection switching indication.
29. The invention as defined in claim 25 wherein said protection switching indication indicates whether a particular affected communications circuit should be line-switched or path-switched, and wherein said step of protection switching is further responsive to said protection switching indication to either line-switch or path-switch said particular affected communications circuit as indicated by saidprotection switching indication.
30. The invention as defined in claim 29 wherein said bidirectional ring transmission system includes four (4) optical fibers two (2) of said optical fibers being employed for said first transmission path and two (2) of said optical fibers being employed for said second transmission path, and wherein said protection switching indication further indicates whether a particular affected communications circuit should be span-switched only, wherein said step of protection switching is further responsive to said protection switching indication to either line-switch, path-switch or span-switch said particular affected communications circuit as indicated by said protection switching indication.
31. The invention as defined in claim 29 wherein said protection switching indication further indicates whether a particular affected communications circuit should not be switched at all, i.e., left unprotected, and wherein said step of protection switching is further responsive to said protection switching indication to either line-switch, path-switch or not switch at all, i.e., leave unprotected, said particular affected communications circuit as indicated by said protection switching indication.
32. The invention as defined in claim 31 wherein said bidirectional ring transmission system includes four (4) optical fibers two (2) of said optical fibers being employed for said first transmission path and two (2) of said optical fibers being employed for said second transmission path, wherein said protection switching indication further indicating whether a particular affected communications circuit should be span-switched only, and wherein said step of protection switching is further responsive to said protection switching indication to either line-switch, path-switch, span-switch or not switch at all, i.e., leave unprotected, said particular affected communications circuit as indicated by said protection switching indication.
33. The invention as defined in claim 25 wherein said bidirectional ring transmission system includes four (4) optical fibers two (2) of said optical fibers being employed for said first transmission path and two (2) of said optical fibers being employed for said second transmission path, said protection switching indicationindicates whether a particular affected communications circuit should be path-switched or span-switched, and said step of protection switching is further responsive to said protection switching indication to either path-switch or span-switch said particular affected communications circuit as indicated by said protection switching indication.
34. The invention as defined in claim 25 wherein said bidirectional ring transmission system includes four (4) optical fibers two (2) of said optical fibers being employed for said first transmission path and two (2) of said optical fibers being employed for said second transmission path, and wherein said protection switching indication further indicates whether a particular affected communications circuit should be span-switched or not switched at all, i.e., left unprotected, and wherein said step of protection switching is further responsive to said protection switching indication to either span-switch or not switch at all, i.e., leave unprotected, said particular affected communications circuit as indicated by said protection switching indication.
35. The invention as defined in claim 25 wherein said protection switching indication indicates whether a particular affected communications circuit should be path-switched or not switched at all, i.e., left unprotected, and wherein said step of protection switching is further responsive to said protection switching indication to either path-switch or not switch, i.e., leave unprotected, said particular affected communications circuit as indicated by said protection switching indication.
36. The invention as defined in claim 35 wherein said bidirectional ring transmission system includes four (4) optical fibers two (2) of said optical fibers being employed for said first transmission path and two (2) of said optical fibers being employed for said second transmission path, wherein said protection switching indication further indicates whether a particular affected communications circuit should be span-switched, and wherein said step of protection switching is further responsive to said protection switching indication to either, path-switch, span-switch or not switch at all, i.e., leave unprotected, said particular affected communications circuit as indicated by said protection switching indication.
37. A method for use in a bidirectional ring transmission system having a plurality of ring nodes interconnected by first and second transmission paths, the first transmission path transporting communication circuits around the ring transmission system from ring node to ring node in a first direction and the second transmission path transporting communications circuits around the ring transmission system from ring node to ring node in a second direction opposite the first direction, the method comprising the steps of:
protection switching predetermined ones of the communications circuits which are active in an individual one of said ring nodes, and which terminate on a ring node that is adjacent thereto, upon failure of said adjacent ring node, and leaving non-protection-switched any others of said active communications circuits.
protection switching predetermined ones of the communications circuits which are active in an individual one of said ring nodes, and which terminate on a ring node that is adjacent thereto, upon failure of said adjacent ring node, and leaving non-protection-switched any others of said active communications circuits.
38. The invention as defined in claim 37 wherein said protection switching is carried out for different ones of said predetermined communicationscircuits using different respective types of protection switching.
39. The invention as defined in claim 38 wherein said different types of protection switching are selected from the group comprising line-switching, path-switching and span-switching.
40. A method for use in a bidirectional ring transmission system having a plurality of ring nodes interconnected by first and second transmission paths which transport communications circuits around the ring transmission system in respective, opposite directions, the method comprising the steps of:
storing for each of individual ones, but less than all, of the communications circuits active in a particular one of the ring nodes an indication that communications circuit is to be protection switched; and upon the failure of a ring node which is adjacent to said particular ring node and which terminates a communications circuit that is active in said particular ring node, protection switching that communications circuit if a protection switching indication is stored therefor and leaving that communications circuit non-protection-switched otherwise.
storing for each of individual ones, but less than all, of the communications circuits active in a particular one of the ring nodes an indication that communications circuit is to be protection switched; and upon the failure of a ring node which is adjacent to said particular ring node and which terminates a communications circuit that is active in said particular ring node, protection switching that communications circuit if a protection switching indication is stored therefor and leaving that communications circuit non-protection-switched otherwise.
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| US07/955,789 US5406401A (en) | 1992-10-02 | 1992-10-02 | Apparatus and method for selective tributary switching in a bidirectional ring transmission system |
| US955,789 | 1992-10-02 |
Publications (2)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| CA2099972A1 CA2099972A1 (en) | 1994-04-03 |
| CA2099972C true CA2099972C (en) | 1999-01-26 |
Family
ID=25497337
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| CA002099972A Expired - Fee Related CA2099972C (en) | 1992-10-02 | 1993-07-06 | Apparatus and method for selective tributary switching in a bidirectional ring transmission system |
Country Status (5)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| US (1) | US5406401A (en) |
| EP (1) | EP0590872B1 (en) |
| JP (1) | JP3195477B2 (en) |
| CA (1) | CA2099972C (en) |
| DE (1) | DE69327219T2 (en) |
Families Citing this family (68)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| JP2784080B2 (en) | 1990-05-09 | 1998-08-06 | 富士通株式会社 | Ring network, fault recovery method therefor, and node used in ring network |
| GB9403223D0 (en) * | 1994-02-19 | 1994-04-13 | Plessey Telecomm | Telecommunications network including remote channel switching protection apparatus |
| JP3561848B2 (en) * | 1994-03-01 | 2004-09-02 | 富士通株式会社 | Transmission apparatus and redundant configuration switching method |
| JPH07264228A (en) * | 1994-03-17 | 1995-10-13 | Fujitsu Ltd | Blsr network with path ais generating function |
| JP3135449B2 (en) * | 1994-03-18 | 2001-02-13 | 富士通株式会社 | Optical transmission equipment |
| KR970003527B1 (en) * | 1994-05-14 | 1997-03-18 | 재단법인 한국전자통신연구소 | Bilateral multichannel optical ring networks using wdm techniques |
| JP3439533B2 (en) * | 1994-06-24 | 2003-08-25 | 富士通株式会社 | SDH2-fiber ring optical multiplexer having selective protection function |
| JPH0897841A (en) * | 1994-09-29 | 1996-04-12 | Hitachi Ltd | Method for controlling path changeover transmitter and the path changeover transmitter |
| DE69532317T2 (en) * | 1994-10-19 | 2004-10-21 | At & T Corp | General predetermined muting in a ring transmission system |
| KR0129608B1 (en) * | 1994-12-21 | 1998-04-14 | 양승택 | An add-drop control device |
| US5541759A (en) * | 1995-05-09 | 1996-07-30 | Microsym Computers, Inc. | Single fiber transceiver and network |
| JP3259126B2 (en) | 1995-09-26 | 2002-02-25 | 富士通株式会社 | Ring transmission system and squelch method for the system |
| AUPN573795A0 (en) * | 1995-10-02 | 1995-10-26 | Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson (Publ) | Transmitting data between multiple computer processors |
| AU718290B2 (en) * | 1995-10-02 | 2000-04-13 | Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson (Publ) | Transmitting data between multiple computer processors |
| IT1277204B1 (en) * | 1995-10-19 | 1997-11-05 | Pirelli S P A Ora Pirelli Cavi | TRANSPARENT OPTICAL COMMUNICATION NETWORK WITH SELF-PROTECTED RING |
| US5914798A (en) * | 1995-12-29 | 1999-06-22 | Mci Communications Corporation | Restoration systems for an optical telecommunications network |
| US5949755A (en) * | 1996-04-12 | 1999-09-07 | Fujitsu Network Communications, Inc. | ATM emulated path protection |
| US5920412A (en) * | 1996-04-24 | 1999-07-06 | Bellsouth Corporation | Method and apparatus for signal routing in an optical network and an ATM system |
| US5793745A (en) * | 1996-05-06 | 1998-08-11 | Bell Communications Research, Inc. | Bundled protection switching in a wide area network background of the invention |
| FR2749725B1 (en) * | 1996-06-06 | 1998-07-31 | Alcatel Submarcom | TERMINAL FOR A SECURE BIDIRECTIONAL LINK CONDUCTING MULTIPLEXED DATA ACCORDING TO THE SYNCHRONOUS DIGITAL HIERARCHY |
| US5751454A (en) * | 1996-10-10 | 1998-05-12 | Northern Telecom Limited | Wavelength bypassed ring networks |
| US7643500B1 (en) | 1996-10-22 | 2010-01-05 | Sprint Communications Company L.P. | Overhead replication for SONET signals |
| US7301953B1 (en) | 1996-10-22 | 2007-11-27 | Sprint Communications Company L.P. | Method and system for transporting a secondary communication signal with a primary communication signal |
| US5991891A (en) * | 1996-12-23 | 1999-11-23 | Lsi Logic Corporation | Method and apparatus for providing loop coherency |
| US6055228A (en) * | 1996-12-23 | 2000-04-25 | Lsi Logic Corporation | Methods and apparatus for dynamic topology configuration in a daisy-chained communication environment |
| US5909175A (en) * | 1997-02-28 | 1999-06-01 | Fujitsu Limited | Connection switching circuit for ring system |
| JPH10336248A (en) * | 1997-04-01 | 1998-12-18 | Canon Inc | Communication system, communication equipment connectable to the same, control method for the same and control method for communication equipment connectable to the same |
| US6631018B1 (en) | 1997-08-27 | 2003-10-07 | Nortel Networks Limited | WDM optical network with passive pass-through at each node |
| US6657952B1 (en) | 1997-11-28 | 2003-12-02 | Nec Corporation | Ring network for sharing protection resource by working communication paths |
| US6052210A (en) * | 1998-01-14 | 2000-04-18 | Mci Communications Corporation | System and method for increasing the robustness of an optical ring network |
| US6295146B1 (en) * | 1998-01-14 | 2001-09-25 | Mci Communications Corporation | System and method for sharing a spare channel among two or more optical ring networks |
| EP1058979A4 (en) * | 1998-02-04 | 2002-10-23 | Chromatis Networks Inc | Virtual star network |
| KR100297590B1 (en) * | 1998-09-18 | 2001-08-07 | 서평원 | Path test method of switch network at exchange |
| US6301254B1 (en) | 1999-03-15 | 2001-10-09 | Tellabs Operations, Inc. | Virtual path ring protection method and apparatus |
| US6331905B1 (en) * | 1999-04-01 | 2001-12-18 | The Trustees Of Columbia University In The City Of New York | Network switch failure restoration |
| CA2371127C (en) * | 1999-05-11 | 2007-09-25 | British Telecommunications Public Limited Company | Optical communications network |
| US6807190B1 (en) * | 1999-05-25 | 2004-10-19 | Lucent Technologies Inc. | Survivable distribution of broadcast signals in loopback rings |
| WO2000076092A1 (en) * | 1999-06-07 | 2000-12-14 | Chromatis Networks, Inc. | Dual homing for dwdm networks in fiber rings |
| US6657969B1 (en) | 1999-06-29 | 2003-12-02 | Cisco Technology, Inc. | Generation of synchronous transport signal data used for network protection operation |
| JP3586603B2 (en) * | 1999-11-25 | 2004-11-10 | Ｎｅｃエレクトロニクス株式会社 | Data transfer device and data transfer method |
| US7099578B1 (en) | 1999-12-16 | 2006-08-29 | Tellabs Operations Inc. | 1:N protection in an optical terminal |
| WO2001047158A1 (en) * | 1999-12-20 | 2001-06-28 | Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba | Transmitter and tributary interface board |
| KR100340725B1 (en) * | 1999-12-29 | 2002-06-20 | 서평원 | Method for management and auto protection switching of signal path in optical transmission system for subscriber service |
| US7167444B1 (en) | 1999-12-29 | 2007-01-23 | At&T Corp. | Family ring protection technique |
| US6614785B1 (en) * | 2000-01-05 | 2003-09-02 | Cisco Technology, Inc. | Automatic propagation of circuit information in a communications network |
| US6616348B1 (en) * | 2000-01-28 | 2003-09-09 | Ciena Corporation | Method and optical communication network for bidirectional protection protocols |
| JP4215369B2 (en) * | 2000-02-09 | 2009-01-28 | 株式会社日立コミュニケーションテクノロジー | Network transmission apparatus and network transmission system |
| AU2001252889A1 (en) * | 2000-03-07 | 2001-09-17 | Corning Inc. | A protection switch in a single two-fiber optical channel shared protection ring |
| US7573915B1 (en) * | 2000-04-25 | 2009-08-11 | Cisco Technology, Inc. | Method and apparatus for transporting network management information in a telecommunications network |
| US6766113B1 (en) * | 2000-06-16 | 2004-07-20 | Lucent Technologies Inc. | Control channel processor and switching mechanism |
| CA2414043A1 (en) | 2000-06-22 | 2001-12-27 | Tellabs Operations Inc. | Shared optical ring protection in a multi-fiber ring |
| US20030142678A1 (en) * | 2000-07-28 | 2003-07-31 | Chan Eric L. | Virtual path ring protection method and apparatus |
| US7050391B1 (en) * | 2000-12-22 | 2006-05-23 | Turin Networks | Method and apparatus for efficient link redundancy |
| US6937823B2 (en) * | 2001-03-05 | 2005-08-30 | Lucent Technologies Inc. | Method for preventing lasing in an optical ring network |
| US7130263B1 (en) * | 2001-03-31 | 2006-10-31 | Redback Networks Inc. | Heterogeneous connections on a bi-directional line switched ring |
| US6950409B1 (en) * | 2001-04-30 | 2005-09-27 | Fujitsu Limited | Method and system for provisioning non-preemptible unprotected traffic in a bi-directional ring |
| US6999468B2 (en) * | 2001-06-04 | 2006-02-14 | Turin Networks | Method and apparatus for line and path selection within SONET/SDH based networks |
| US7633858B2 (en) * | 2001-09-10 | 2009-12-15 | Ciena Corporation | Providing embedded protection in a network cross-connect device for SONET networks |
| JP3844982B2 (en) | 2001-09-10 | 2006-11-15 | 富士通株式会社 | Transmission equipment |
| US6917759B2 (en) * | 2002-01-31 | 2005-07-12 | Nortel Networks Limited | Shared mesh signaling algorithm and apparatus |
| DE60208150T2 (en) * | 2002-03-08 | 2006-06-22 | Alcatel | A failure recovery method in a communication network constructed of rings, an associated communication network and network element |
| US20030214962A1 (en) * | 2002-05-15 | 2003-11-20 | Mark Allaye-Chan | Method and apparatus for bandwidth optimization in network ring topology |
| US7535831B2 (en) * | 2003-09-16 | 2009-05-19 | Nortel Networks Limited | Method and apparatus for providing grades of service for unprotected traffic in an optical network |
| US20050058060A1 (en) * | 2003-09-16 | 2005-03-17 | Nortel Networks Limited | K-byte extension and tunnel identifying scheme for tunnel-based shared mesh protection |
| US20050088963A1 (en) * | 2003-10-24 | 2005-04-28 | Nortel Networks Limited | Method and apparatus for protection switch messaging on a shared mesh network |
| US7590046B1 (en) * | 2003-12-31 | 2009-09-15 | Ciena Corporation | Protected SONET/SDH networks having delayed fault propagation |
| US20060165410A1 (en) * | 2005-01-26 | 2006-07-27 | At&T Corp. | Arrangement for avoiding node isolation in all-optical communication networks |
| EP2197142A1 (en) * | 2008-12-15 | 2010-06-16 | Alcatel Lucent | System and method for packet protection switching |
Family Cites Families (9)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US4195351A (en) * | 1978-01-27 | 1980-03-25 | International Business Machines Corporation | Loop configured data transmission system |
| BE895438A (en) * | 1982-12-22 | 1983-06-22 | Bell Telephone Mfg | COMMUNICATION SYSTEM WITH MULTIPLE RINGS |
| US4538264A (en) * | 1983-02-14 | 1985-08-27 | Prime Computer, Inc. | Self-repairing ring communications network |
| JPH0831869B2 (en) * | 1987-02-23 | 1996-03-27 | 株式会社日立製作所 | Data transmission method and data transmission device |
| JPH0752886B2 (en) * | 1987-12-19 | 1995-06-05 | 富士通株式会社 | How to configure a loop network |
| US4835763A (en) * | 1988-02-04 | 1989-05-30 | Bell Communications Research, Inc. | Survivable ring network |
| US5159595A (en) * | 1988-04-08 | 1992-10-27 | Northern Telecom Limited | Ring transmission system |
| US5113398A (en) * | 1989-06-01 | 1992-05-12 | Shackleton System Drives Corporation | Self-healing data network and network node controller |
| JP2732674B2 (en) * | 1989-07-10 | 1998-03-30 | 株式会社東芝 | Data transmission equipment |
-
1992
- 1992-10-02 US US07/955,789 patent/US5406401A/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
-
1993
- 1993-07-06 CA CA002099972A patent/CA2099972C/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
- 1993-09-22 EP EP93307506A patent/EP0590872B1/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 1993-09-22 DE DE69327219T patent/DE69327219T2/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
- 1993-10-01 JP JP26777693A patent/JP3195477B2/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
Also Published As
| Publication number | Publication date |
|---|---|
| EP0590872B1 (en) | 1999-12-08 |
| US5406401A (en) | 1995-04-11 |
| JP3195477B2 (en) | 2001-08-06 |
| DE69327219T2 (en) | 2000-07-06 |
| EP0590872A1 (en) | 1994-04-06 |
| DE69327219D1 (en) | 2000-01-13 |
| JPH06205028A (en) | 1994-07-22 |
| CA2099972A1 (en) | 1994-04-03 |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| CA2099972C (en) | Apparatus and method for selective tributary switching in a bidirectional ring transmission system | |
| CA2065471C (en) | System for squelching communications circuits terminating in failed ring nodes | |
| CA2094541C (en) | Dual hubbing in a bidirectional line-switched ring transmission system | |
| JP3195465B2 (en) | Bidirectional multiplex section switching ring transmission system and communication signal transfer method | |
| EP0745294B1 (en) | Telecommunications network including a channel switching protection arrangement | |
| EP0654922B1 (en) | Communication system having interconnected line-switched and path-switched ring transmission systems | |
| EP0654924B1 (en) | Communication system having interconnected bidirectional line-switched ring transmission systems | |
| US5440540A (en) | Ring interworking between a bidirectional line-switched ring transmission system and another ring transmission system | |
| US6188667B1 (en) | Transport interface for performing protection switching of telecommunications traffic | |
| EP0654923B1 (en) | Communication system having interconnected path-switched ring transmission systems | |
| CA1323117C (en) | Optical subscriber network transmission system | |
| CA2160392C (en) | Generalized deterministic squelching in a ring transmission system | |
| JP3275213B2 (en) | Service Slot Assignment Scheme for Optical Bidirectional Ring Transmission System |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| EEER | Examination request | ||
| MKLA | Lapsed |