CA2219262A1 - Interactive learning system with pretest - Google Patents
Interactive learning system with pretest Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CA2219262A1 CA2219262A1 CA002219262A CA2219262A CA2219262A1 CA 2219262 A1 CA2219262 A1 CA 2219262A1 CA 002219262 A CA002219262 A CA 002219262A CA 2219262 A CA2219262 A CA 2219262A CA 2219262 A1 CA2219262 A1 CA 2219262A1
- Authority
- CA
- Canada
- Prior art keywords
- learning
- individual
- sequence
- user
- database
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Abandoned
Links
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G09—EDUCATION; CRYPTOGRAPHY; DISPLAY; ADVERTISING; SEALS
- G09B—EDUCATIONAL OR DEMONSTRATION APPLIANCES; APPLIANCES FOR TEACHING, OR COMMUNICATING WITH, THE BLIND, DEAF OR MUTE; MODELS; PLANETARIA; GLOBES; MAPS; DIAGRAMS
- G09B7/00—Electrically-operated teaching apparatus or devices working with questions and answers
- G09B7/02—Electrically-operated teaching apparatus or devices working with questions and answers of the type wherein the student is expected to construct an answer to the question which is presented or wherein the machine gives an answer to the question presented by a student
- G09B7/04—Electrically-operated teaching apparatus or devices working with questions and answers of the type wherein the student is expected to construct an answer to the question which is presented or wherein the machine gives an answer to the question presented by a student characterised by modifying the teaching programme in response to a wrong answer, e.g. repeating the question, supplying a further explanation
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G09—EDUCATION; CRYPTOGRAPHY; DISPLAY; ADVERTISING; SEALS
- G09B—EDUCATIONAL OR DEMONSTRATION APPLIANCES; APPLIANCES FOR TEACHING, OR COMMUNICATING WITH, THE BLIND, DEAF OR MUTE; MODELS; PLANETARIA; GLOBES; MAPS; DIAGRAMS
- G09B7/00—Electrically-operated teaching apparatus or devices working with questions and answers
- G09B7/06—Electrically-operated teaching apparatus or devices working with questions and answers of the multiple-choice answer-type, i.e. where a given question is provided with a series of answers and a choice has to be made from the answers
Abstract
A computer method of automatically providing a paperless, individualized, learning sequence including the steps of storing in a computer readable database a plurality of questions directed toward assessing an individual's understanding of a selected learning objective for each member of a plurality of different learning objectives. Next, automatically evaluating the individual by randomly and sequentially selecting from the database at least one question associated with each member of the plurality of learning objectives and displaying each selected question to the individual for a response wherein each response is received and evaluated relative to a predetermined standard before the next question is selected. Next, accumulating at least some of the results of the evaluations in a computer storage unit in computer readable form and processing the results to automatically produce a specific sequence of instructional units in response to those responses which varied materially from the respective standard. Finally, presenting the sequence of instructional units on a display for the individual wherein the individual can interact with each of the units via the display.
Description
INTERACT~VE LEARNING SYSTEM WITH PRETEST
Field of the Invention:
The invention pertains to interactive le~rning systems. More particularly, the invention pertains to co~uL.,~ based interactive learning systems which incG,l,o~ale pre and post testing capabilities to evaluate the status and progress of a user.
R?~ Jround of the Invention:
Computer based interactive le~rnin~ systems are known. One particular example is described in U.S. Patent No. 5,395,243 to Lubin et al. entitled Int~d~;Liv~ T e~rning System and which is ~ign~e to the ~c~i n~e hereof. The specification and figures of the Lubin et al. Patent are incorporated herein by reference.
Lubin et al. describes a collll.uhl based interactive learning system wherein a user can be ~si~tecl in le~rning how to use a pre-written application prograrn. Typical application programs include word processing or spread sheet operation or operating systems. Lubin et al. describes three different learning paths.
One of the learning paths is a preset lesson path in which the user goes through a sequence of audio visual lessons relating to various predetennined features of the application prograrn being studied. Upon completion of the lesson sequence, the user is then given an oppo, lw~ ~ Ly to work with the actual application prograrn to re-e.lfolce the previously provided instruction.
In a second learning path, the user may indep~ntltontly select a topic relating to an aspect of the application prograrn which is being studied. The user will then receive audio/visual lessons and/or electronically displayed m~t~ri~l relating to that topic.
In a third learning path, the user is able to execute the application program without receiving any training of the type provided by Lubin's system.
During this sequence however, the user may access various help files which can present electronic textual reference information relating to that application program while the program is running. This process can be carried out without having to exit the application program.
The above described types of learning paths have been found to be useful and effective for many users. Lubin's system, however, did not incorporate any capability to evaluate a user's level of skill prior to executing any of thelearning paths. It would be desirable to be able to combine systems of the type taught by Lubin with a functional capability to take into account a user's initial level of skill, if any.
Thus, there continues to be a need for interactive learning systems which take into account a user's initial skill level. It would also be desirable, if a user were able to combine lesson elennentc to create an individll~li7ed le~rningexperience apart from any pre-established learning paths.
Summary of the Invention:
In accordance with the invention, an interactive learning system and method are provided and can be used for learning a selected, pre-written program.
In one aspect of the invention, a paperless, indivi~ li7~-1 learning sequence can be developed and presented to the respective user for the purpose of improving a user's skill and underst~n~ling with respect to given subject matter.
An aypa~ s in accordance with the present invention incorporates a plc~lofed, m~ehine-readable d~t~b~e having a plurality of questions or exercises which are directed toward ~sessin~ the individuals underst~ntling of a selected learning objective. Pluralities of questions are provided for each member of a plurality of different learning objectives.
The a~a.alus carries out an auLolll~lic evaluation of the individual by sequentially selecting from the ~t~b~e at least one of the questions or exercises associated with each member of the plurality of learning objectives. The selected question or exercise is displayed for the individual who in turn enters a response.
Each of the responses that is received is evaluated relative to a predeterrnin~dstandard before the next question is selected.
The system accurnulates the responses and the results of the evaluations for subsequent processing The a~dlus in turn produces from the results of the evaluations a sequence of instructional units, based on those responses which varied materially from the res~e~ te standard which are int~n~1ed to irnprove the user's skills on an individll~li7Pd basis. The sequence of instructional units can then be presented on a display, for exarnple, for the individual. The individual can then progress through the sequence of units so as to improve selected skills in response to the prior evaluation.
In one aspect of the invention, subsequent to completely execution of the sequence of instructional units, the user can then go through a post-learning evaluation or test for comparison purposes.
In yet another aspect of the invention, a user can select from among a number of object elements to independently create a personalized learning experience. At a first level, topic-type object elements can be selected which contain, for example, a single objective and an ~sescment capability. At a higher level, lesson-type object elements can be selected. The lesson-type object elements incorporate a plurality of related topic-type object elements. In another aspect of the invention, at yet another level, unit-type object elements can be selected. The unit-type object elements incorporate a plurality of related lesson-type object elemlo.nt~. , In yet another aspect of the invention, learning-type objects can be grouped together and associated because they incorporate related subject matter or one functions as a prerequisite to another. Similarly, unit-type objects can in turn be associated with one another because they incorporate related subject or because some of them represent prerequisites for others.
Numerous other advantages and features of the present invention will become readily a~arc~ll from the following detailed description of the invention and the embodiments thereof, from the claims and from the accompanying drawings in which the details of the invention are fully and completely disclosed as a part of this specification.
Brief Description of the Drawings:
Fig. 1 is a block diagram of a system in accordance with the present invention;
Fig. 2 is an overall flow diagram of the process of creating an individual learning profile;
Fig. 3 is a more detailed flow diagram of one aspect of the process of Fig. 2;
Fig. 4 is a more detailed flow diagram of another aspect of the process of Fig. 2; and Fig. S is a flow diagram of a process of selecting learning objects for the creation of a personal learning experience.
Detailed Description of the Preferred Embodiments:
While this invention is susceptible of embodiment in many different forms, there are shown in the drawing and will be described herein in detail specific embodiment~ thereof with the underst~n-ling that the present disclosure is to beconsidered as an exemplification of the principles of the invention and is not int~nde~l to limit the invention to the specific embodiments illustrated.
Figure 1 illustrates an interactive le~rning system 10 which incol~oldles a plurality of components. The system 10 includes a control unit 12, which could implennented as a microprocessor. Associated with the microprocessor12 are read-only memory 14 and read-write memory 16 which co~ "icate with the processor 12 via a bidirectional bus structure 18. The memories 14, 16, as is known in the art, can be used to perm~nently or temporarily store constance, programs being executed, or related data.
Also coupled to the bus 18 is a monitor, such as a CRT-type display 20, loud speakers 22, magnetic disk drive 24, CD-Rom Drive 26 and a user input device 28. The user input device 28 could be a keyboard, it could alternately be a mouse.
In addition, a local area network (LAN) interface 30 enables the system 10 to co,ln"u,~icate with the local network. Further, a remote network interface 32 provides bidirectional con~l,lu,~ication with the Worldwide Web or other remote networks either through teleco"m~ ications or through other forms of datatr~n~mi~ion without limitation.
In normal operation, programs can be stored on and read from disk drive 24 or CD-Rom drive 26. Graphics can also be read from the CD-Rom drive.
Both the disk drive 24 and the CD-Rom drive 26 can be used as sources from which ~l~t~b~ses can be accessed.
During normal operation of the system 10, visual information in lessons can be displayed on the display unit 20, under control of the processor 12.
Text and graphics can be read from disk drive 24 or CD-Rom drive 26 for the purpose of displaying same to the user. As will be discussed subsequently, a control program for the purpose of carrying out the interactive learning process can be stored on one or both of disk drive 24 or CD-Rom 26 for access by processor 12.
Processor 12 is thus able to carry out a prestored process which provides for individual ~X~ies~ ent of a user's skills prior to the user going through the interactive le~rning process.
Figure 2 is a flow diagram illustrating various steps of a method in accordance with the present invention. In a step 100, the ope~a~ g system for the system 10 is started. In a step 102 execution of the interactive learning systemapplication prograrn, of a type, for example described in Lubin but for use with an icon driven operating system such as available under the Tr~dem~rk Windows 95 is started. In a step 104 the learning system carries out an initial sequence ofdisplaying titles and related text. When the system exits the initi~ting step 104, the user can select an introduction in a step 106 or can elect to turn directly to the course associated with the system in a step 108.
In a step 110, a user can enter a course overview and pre-~csPc~" .ent testing sequence. After passing through a course overview in a step 112, the user enters the beginning of a plurality of pre-~csçssment sequences indicated generally at 114A, 114B...114N. The steps of a selected pre-~ses~ment sequence are similarso a description of the sequence 114a will also describe sequences 114B.. 114N.
In a step 120, instructions are presented on the display 20 for the user as to how to carry out the pre-~es~mçnt process. Subsequently, in a step 122 a plurality of questions or exercises are displayed, one at a time, irl random order on the display 20. The user responds to each of the questions or exercises using the keyboard or mouse 28 and the responses are stored by the processor 12. In a step124, the responses are colllpaled to a pre-established standard, also stored in the disk drive 24 or the CD-Rom drive 26 to assess the performance of the user. For example and without limitation, if questions are presented to the user, they can be ranged so as to have right or wrong answers or to have more prefe.l~d vs. less preferred ~lswt:l~ which can be in turn reflected in the pre-stored standard. The correlation between the answers received from the user during the step 122 and the appro~l;ate or desirable answers as reflected in the pre~lored standard, provides a basis for establishing a qualllil~ re ~ses~mçnt of user performance. Subsequent to the step 124, if an individll~li7t cl le~rning profile is to be produced based on the sequence 114a, that profile is then produced in a step 126. Subsequent to the step 126, the learning units can be ~l~selll~d to the user in a step 130 ~ cll~se subsequently.
If desired, prior to generation of the indiviclll~li7ed learning profile in the step 126, additional pre-~sç~cment sequences 114B....114N can be executedto provide a composite learning profile.
Figure 3 illustrates in more detail the generation of the indivi~ln~li7ed learning track as illustrated in the step 126. Test items l-l.. l-N to be presented in the step 122 are plei,lored in one of the disk drive 24 or CD-Rom drive 26. In the step 122, one of the test questions or exercises is selected and presented to the user on the display 20. The answer or response received via the input device 28 is colllpaled to a previously stored answer and a step 122a. If the answer is 10 nn~ticf~ctQry, the objective associated with the test item and the associated topic are retrieved in respective steps 122b, 122c. At least the associated topic is then added to the individual learning profile in a step 122d. If the answer is answered correctly in the step 122a, a determination is made in the step 122e if the testing sequence is finished. If it is not finished, the next test item selected. If the test sequence is fini~h~cl either the next text sequence 114b is entered or the learning sequence associated with the individual profile is then executed in the step 130.
Examples of test items follow as Examples 1 and 2. Example 1 illustrates two dirre,ell~ m~tching-type test items. Example 2 illustrates two different process educating test items.
F.~m Objec~ve:
Id~ th~ l~lorer f~Lu~ view files a~d ~oldes~
t~A Topic~
~ thc Display FYT~n.lin~ lap~ Folders Test It~ (qTl~!s~nn ~pe = rn~ h~n~) ~ch ~he b~to~. to thC t~ t ~, r I
~ Oispla~rs files as l~ge ic~
b~ plays i~lc n~m~q in a li~t c 1~ Di~lays ilc inf~ tinn for c~ch file d: ~ Op~~s e: J Clu~ a ro~
Tcst ~tcm ~ n~ pC--ms~ hir~3 Ma~ch the fcan~e to the ~red u~ "~
a: ~ge by D ~s~ Ordm ~lc n~mre by last m~Aifi~ tinn h: Arrallg~ c Lisrs file names aDc~ s~ r~s c: ~rr~ge by Type Displ~ys 311 te3~ lioc~ ts ~: Plus 3igQ Di~play~ ~hc filcs ~ a fol~cr e: ~tinu; Sign Closes an oI~en f~ldcr co~ files li~yqn.p~ 2 ObJC~Vc:
Prc~icw a filc lL~ing Quic~ ~lew 0~ u.
Relat~d Topi~
~uick Vicw Tc~t Item 1: (q~ff~inn lypc ~ ation) CnmrIc~e th~ ce a Quick Vicw of ~O~Tl~)OC using ~e shortcut memL
T~ I~ (q~ff~Qn type ~ o:-nnl~ti~.l) ~omrI~tr the ac~LoD. So pT~ Q~ Vt:w orA~ oc us~g ~e shûrtcllt me Figure 4 is a flow diagram illustrating in more detail executing the personal learning sequence, step 130. Where the personal learning sequence, created in the step 122d includes a plurality of topics Tl..TN the system 10 presents each of the selected topics in a series of steps 130-1...130-N to the user via the display 20.
The user can interact with the various presented topics via the keyboard or mouse 28 during the process of going through that particular individu~li7e-1 learning sequence. Subsequent to exiting the learning sequence, the system 10 can presenta post-~cse~ment test in a step 132 to cletermine the level of skill that the user has hllploved to as a result of the process. A similar set of steps can be carried out to implement the personal learning sequence for each of the units U2.. UN.
Hence, when completed, the user will have experienced an indivi~ li7tod learning sequence in connection with one or more of the units l-N.
The user can then exit to the step 109 and enter the application or other program being taught for direct execution or can enter additional course units for further 1 5 instruction.
Fig. 5 illustrates an overall flow diagrarn for an alternate approach to creating a personalized learning experience based on collecting together a pluralit,v of sepa~ately ~cces~ihle learning objects. The learning objects are contained in an accessible date base which is org~ni7~1 in several different ways, 20 having both hierarchical and contact-sensitive aspects.
A course object is made up of a plurality of independently accessible unit objects. Unit objects are learning objects which include a plurality of independent lesson objects. Lesson objects, in turn, are also learning objects which are made up of a plurality of dependent topic objects. Topic objects are dependent 25 - objects which contain a single objective and an ~ses~ment.
The content of a learning object is illustrated, in an overall sense, in block 150 of Fig. 5.
The lesson object is the smallest independent instructional activity available to a user. A given lesson object exhibits int~ l cohesion and is focused about a plurality of dependent topic objects.
A lesson object incorporates a plurality of objectives as well as a second plurality of test or ~C~eccment items. It also incorporates predefined sequencing and interactions between related, dep~n~l~nt, topic objects.
Lesson objects can be linked with other lesson objects or can stand alone. Topic objects, by way of contrast, are dependent on the associated lessonobject and contain only a single objective and an associated ~ses~ment.
As illustrated in block 152 of Fig. 5, learning objects can be implemented out of a plurality of linked pages. The pages can be linked togetherboth linearally and non-linearally. Pages can contain text, multi-media components and user interaction logic.
Alternately, learning objects can be grouped together as a result of content or because one or more serves as a prerequisite for another, as illustrated in element 154 of Fig. 5.
A plurality of learning objects can be selected via a User through an object access program 156. The User can select, via the access prograrn 156, oneor more lesson objects to be experienced for the purpose of addressing an education or training objective. Learning objects can be stored on a variety of media such as magnetic disc drives and/or CD Rom drives. The object access I?rogram 156 can be accesced by the User not only directly through a local area network but also remotely via the Internet and the Worldwide Web, if desired.
From the foregoing, it will be observed that numerous variations and modifications may be effected without departing from the spirit and scope of theinvention. It is to be understood that no limitation with respect to the specific a~aLdlus illustrated herein is intçnded or should be inferred. It is, of course, intende-l to cover by the appended claims all such modifications as fall within the scope of the claims.
Field of the Invention:
The invention pertains to interactive le~rning systems. More particularly, the invention pertains to co~uL.,~ based interactive learning systems which incG,l,o~ale pre and post testing capabilities to evaluate the status and progress of a user.
R?~ Jround of the Invention:
Computer based interactive le~rnin~ systems are known. One particular example is described in U.S. Patent No. 5,395,243 to Lubin et al. entitled Int~d~;Liv~ T e~rning System and which is ~ign~e to the ~c~i n~e hereof. The specification and figures of the Lubin et al. Patent are incorporated herein by reference.
Lubin et al. describes a collll.uhl based interactive learning system wherein a user can be ~si~tecl in le~rning how to use a pre-written application prograrn. Typical application programs include word processing or spread sheet operation or operating systems. Lubin et al. describes three different learning paths.
One of the learning paths is a preset lesson path in which the user goes through a sequence of audio visual lessons relating to various predetennined features of the application prograrn being studied. Upon completion of the lesson sequence, the user is then given an oppo, lw~ ~ Ly to work with the actual application prograrn to re-e.lfolce the previously provided instruction.
In a second learning path, the user may indep~ntltontly select a topic relating to an aspect of the application prograrn which is being studied. The user will then receive audio/visual lessons and/or electronically displayed m~t~ri~l relating to that topic.
In a third learning path, the user is able to execute the application program without receiving any training of the type provided by Lubin's system.
During this sequence however, the user may access various help files which can present electronic textual reference information relating to that application program while the program is running. This process can be carried out without having to exit the application program.
The above described types of learning paths have been found to be useful and effective for many users. Lubin's system, however, did not incorporate any capability to evaluate a user's level of skill prior to executing any of thelearning paths. It would be desirable to be able to combine systems of the type taught by Lubin with a functional capability to take into account a user's initial level of skill, if any.
Thus, there continues to be a need for interactive learning systems which take into account a user's initial skill level. It would also be desirable, if a user were able to combine lesson elennentc to create an individll~li7ed le~rningexperience apart from any pre-established learning paths.
Summary of the Invention:
In accordance with the invention, an interactive learning system and method are provided and can be used for learning a selected, pre-written program.
In one aspect of the invention, a paperless, indivi~ li7~-1 learning sequence can be developed and presented to the respective user for the purpose of improving a user's skill and underst~n~ling with respect to given subject matter.
An aypa~ s in accordance with the present invention incorporates a plc~lofed, m~ehine-readable d~t~b~e having a plurality of questions or exercises which are directed toward ~sessin~ the individuals underst~ntling of a selected learning objective. Pluralities of questions are provided for each member of a plurality of different learning objectives.
The a~a.alus carries out an auLolll~lic evaluation of the individual by sequentially selecting from the ~t~b~e at least one of the questions or exercises associated with each member of the plurality of learning objectives. The selected question or exercise is displayed for the individual who in turn enters a response.
Each of the responses that is received is evaluated relative to a predeterrnin~dstandard before the next question is selected.
The system accurnulates the responses and the results of the evaluations for subsequent processing The a~dlus in turn produces from the results of the evaluations a sequence of instructional units, based on those responses which varied materially from the res~e~ te standard which are int~n~1ed to irnprove the user's skills on an individll~li7Pd basis. The sequence of instructional units can then be presented on a display, for exarnple, for the individual. The individual can then progress through the sequence of units so as to improve selected skills in response to the prior evaluation.
In one aspect of the invention, subsequent to completely execution of the sequence of instructional units, the user can then go through a post-learning evaluation or test for comparison purposes.
In yet another aspect of the invention, a user can select from among a number of object elements to independently create a personalized learning experience. At a first level, topic-type object elements can be selected which contain, for example, a single objective and an ~sescment capability. At a higher level, lesson-type object elements can be selected. The lesson-type object elements incorporate a plurality of related topic-type object elements. In another aspect of the invention, at yet another level, unit-type object elements can be selected. The unit-type object elements incorporate a plurality of related lesson-type object elemlo.nt~. , In yet another aspect of the invention, learning-type objects can be grouped together and associated because they incorporate related subject matter or one functions as a prerequisite to another. Similarly, unit-type objects can in turn be associated with one another because they incorporate related subject or because some of them represent prerequisites for others.
Numerous other advantages and features of the present invention will become readily a~arc~ll from the following detailed description of the invention and the embodiments thereof, from the claims and from the accompanying drawings in which the details of the invention are fully and completely disclosed as a part of this specification.
Brief Description of the Drawings:
Fig. 1 is a block diagram of a system in accordance with the present invention;
Fig. 2 is an overall flow diagram of the process of creating an individual learning profile;
Fig. 3 is a more detailed flow diagram of one aspect of the process of Fig. 2;
Fig. 4 is a more detailed flow diagram of another aspect of the process of Fig. 2; and Fig. S is a flow diagram of a process of selecting learning objects for the creation of a personal learning experience.
Detailed Description of the Preferred Embodiments:
While this invention is susceptible of embodiment in many different forms, there are shown in the drawing and will be described herein in detail specific embodiment~ thereof with the underst~n-ling that the present disclosure is to beconsidered as an exemplification of the principles of the invention and is not int~nde~l to limit the invention to the specific embodiments illustrated.
Figure 1 illustrates an interactive le~rning system 10 which incol~oldles a plurality of components. The system 10 includes a control unit 12, which could implennented as a microprocessor. Associated with the microprocessor12 are read-only memory 14 and read-write memory 16 which co~ "icate with the processor 12 via a bidirectional bus structure 18. The memories 14, 16, as is known in the art, can be used to perm~nently or temporarily store constance, programs being executed, or related data.
Also coupled to the bus 18 is a monitor, such as a CRT-type display 20, loud speakers 22, magnetic disk drive 24, CD-Rom Drive 26 and a user input device 28. The user input device 28 could be a keyboard, it could alternately be a mouse.
In addition, a local area network (LAN) interface 30 enables the system 10 to co,ln"u,~icate with the local network. Further, a remote network interface 32 provides bidirectional con~l,lu,~ication with the Worldwide Web or other remote networks either through teleco"m~ ications or through other forms of datatr~n~mi~ion without limitation.
In normal operation, programs can be stored on and read from disk drive 24 or CD-Rom drive 26. Graphics can also be read from the CD-Rom drive.
Both the disk drive 24 and the CD-Rom drive 26 can be used as sources from which ~l~t~b~ses can be accessed.
During normal operation of the system 10, visual information in lessons can be displayed on the display unit 20, under control of the processor 12.
Text and graphics can be read from disk drive 24 or CD-Rom drive 26 for the purpose of displaying same to the user. As will be discussed subsequently, a control program for the purpose of carrying out the interactive learning process can be stored on one or both of disk drive 24 or CD-Rom 26 for access by processor 12.
Processor 12 is thus able to carry out a prestored process which provides for individual ~X~ies~ ent of a user's skills prior to the user going through the interactive le~rning process.
Figure 2 is a flow diagram illustrating various steps of a method in accordance with the present invention. In a step 100, the ope~a~ g system for the system 10 is started. In a step 102 execution of the interactive learning systemapplication prograrn, of a type, for example described in Lubin but for use with an icon driven operating system such as available under the Tr~dem~rk Windows 95 is started. In a step 104 the learning system carries out an initial sequence ofdisplaying titles and related text. When the system exits the initi~ting step 104, the user can select an introduction in a step 106 or can elect to turn directly to the course associated with the system in a step 108.
In a step 110, a user can enter a course overview and pre-~csPc~" .ent testing sequence. After passing through a course overview in a step 112, the user enters the beginning of a plurality of pre-~csçssment sequences indicated generally at 114A, 114B...114N. The steps of a selected pre-~ses~ment sequence are similarso a description of the sequence 114a will also describe sequences 114B.. 114N.
In a step 120, instructions are presented on the display 20 for the user as to how to carry out the pre-~es~mçnt process. Subsequently, in a step 122 a plurality of questions or exercises are displayed, one at a time, irl random order on the display 20. The user responds to each of the questions or exercises using the keyboard or mouse 28 and the responses are stored by the processor 12. In a step124, the responses are colllpaled to a pre-established standard, also stored in the disk drive 24 or the CD-Rom drive 26 to assess the performance of the user. For example and without limitation, if questions are presented to the user, they can be ranged so as to have right or wrong answers or to have more prefe.l~d vs. less preferred ~lswt:l~ which can be in turn reflected in the pre-stored standard. The correlation between the answers received from the user during the step 122 and the appro~l;ate or desirable answers as reflected in the pre~lored standard, provides a basis for establishing a qualllil~ re ~ses~mçnt of user performance. Subsequent to the step 124, if an individll~li7t cl le~rning profile is to be produced based on the sequence 114a, that profile is then produced in a step 126. Subsequent to the step 126, the learning units can be ~l~selll~d to the user in a step 130 ~ cll~se subsequently.
If desired, prior to generation of the indiviclll~li7ed learning profile in the step 126, additional pre-~sç~cment sequences 114B....114N can be executedto provide a composite learning profile.
Figure 3 illustrates in more detail the generation of the indivi~ln~li7ed learning track as illustrated in the step 126. Test items l-l.. l-N to be presented in the step 122 are plei,lored in one of the disk drive 24 or CD-Rom drive 26. In the step 122, one of the test questions or exercises is selected and presented to the user on the display 20. The answer or response received via the input device 28 is colllpaled to a previously stored answer and a step 122a. If the answer is 10 nn~ticf~ctQry, the objective associated with the test item and the associated topic are retrieved in respective steps 122b, 122c. At least the associated topic is then added to the individual learning profile in a step 122d. If the answer is answered correctly in the step 122a, a determination is made in the step 122e if the testing sequence is finished. If it is not finished, the next test item selected. If the test sequence is fini~h~cl either the next text sequence 114b is entered or the learning sequence associated with the individual profile is then executed in the step 130.
Examples of test items follow as Examples 1 and 2. Example 1 illustrates two dirre,ell~ m~tching-type test items. Example 2 illustrates two different process educating test items.
F.~m Objec~ve:
Id~ th~ l~lorer f~Lu~ view files a~d ~oldes~
t~A Topic~
~ thc Display FYT~n.lin~ lap~ Folders Test It~ (qTl~!s~nn ~pe = rn~ h~n~) ~ch ~he b~to~. to thC t~ t ~, r I
~ Oispla~rs files as l~ge ic~
b~ plays i~lc n~m~q in a li~t c 1~ Di~lays ilc inf~ tinn for c~ch file d: ~ Op~~s e: J Clu~ a ro~
Tcst ~tcm ~ n~ pC--ms~ hir~3 Ma~ch the fcan~e to the ~red u~ "~
a: ~ge by D ~s~ Ordm ~lc n~mre by last m~Aifi~ tinn h: Arrallg~ c Lisrs file names aDc~ s~ r~s c: ~rr~ge by Type Displ~ys 311 te3~ lioc~ ts ~: Plus 3igQ Di~play~ ~hc filcs ~ a fol~cr e: ~tinu; Sign Closes an oI~en f~ldcr co~ files li~yqn.p~ 2 ObJC~Vc:
Prc~icw a filc lL~ing Quic~ ~lew 0~ u.
Relat~d Topi~
~uick Vicw Tc~t Item 1: (q~ff~inn lypc ~ ation) CnmrIc~e th~ ce a Quick Vicw of ~O~Tl~)OC using ~e shortcut memL
T~ I~ (q~ff~Qn type ~ o:-nnl~ti~.l) ~omrI~tr the ac~LoD. So pT~ Q~ Vt:w orA~ oc us~g ~e shûrtcllt me Figure 4 is a flow diagram illustrating in more detail executing the personal learning sequence, step 130. Where the personal learning sequence, created in the step 122d includes a plurality of topics Tl..TN the system 10 presents each of the selected topics in a series of steps 130-1...130-N to the user via the display 20.
The user can interact with the various presented topics via the keyboard or mouse 28 during the process of going through that particular individu~li7e-1 learning sequence. Subsequent to exiting the learning sequence, the system 10 can presenta post-~cse~ment test in a step 132 to cletermine the level of skill that the user has hllploved to as a result of the process. A similar set of steps can be carried out to implement the personal learning sequence for each of the units U2.. UN.
Hence, when completed, the user will have experienced an indivi~ li7tod learning sequence in connection with one or more of the units l-N.
The user can then exit to the step 109 and enter the application or other program being taught for direct execution or can enter additional course units for further 1 5 instruction.
Fig. 5 illustrates an overall flow diagrarn for an alternate approach to creating a personalized learning experience based on collecting together a pluralit,v of sepa~ately ~cces~ihle learning objects. The learning objects are contained in an accessible date base which is org~ni7~1 in several different ways, 20 having both hierarchical and contact-sensitive aspects.
A course object is made up of a plurality of independently accessible unit objects. Unit objects are learning objects which include a plurality of independent lesson objects. Lesson objects, in turn, are also learning objects which are made up of a plurality of dependent topic objects. Topic objects are dependent 25 - objects which contain a single objective and an ~ses~ment.
The content of a learning object is illustrated, in an overall sense, in block 150 of Fig. 5.
The lesson object is the smallest independent instructional activity available to a user. A given lesson object exhibits int~ l cohesion and is focused about a plurality of dependent topic objects.
A lesson object incorporates a plurality of objectives as well as a second plurality of test or ~C~eccment items. It also incorporates predefined sequencing and interactions between related, dep~n~l~nt, topic objects.
Lesson objects can be linked with other lesson objects or can stand alone. Topic objects, by way of contrast, are dependent on the associated lessonobject and contain only a single objective and an associated ~ses~ment.
As illustrated in block 152 of Fig. 5, learning objects can be implemented out of a plurality of linked pages. The pages can be linked togetherboth linearally and non-linearally. Pages can contain text, multi-media components and user interaction logic.
Alternately, learning objects can be grouped together as a result of content or because one or more serves as a prerequisite for another, as illustrated in element 154 of Fig. 5.
A plurality of learning objects can be selected via a User through an object access program 156. The User can select, via the access prograrn 156, oneor more lesson objects to be experienced for the purpose of addressing an education or training objective. Learning objects can be stored on a variety of media such as magnetic disc drives and/or CD Rom drives. The object access I?rogram 156 can be accesced by the User not only directly through a local area network but also remotely via the Internet and the Worldwide Web, if desired.
From the foregoing, it will be observed that numerous variations and modifications may be effected without departing from the spirit and scope of theinvention. It is to be understood that no limitation with respect to the specific a~aLdlus illustrated herein is intçnded or should be inferred. It is, of course, intende-l to cover by the appended claims all such modifications as fall within the scope of the claims.
Claims (9)
1. A computer based method of automatically providing a paperless, individualized, learning sequence comprising:
storing in a computer readable database a plurality of questions directed toward assessing an individual's understanding of a selected learning objective for each member of a plurality of different learning objectives;
automatically evaluating the individual by randomly and sequentially selected from the database at least one question associated with each member of the plurality of learning objectives and displaying each selected question to the individual for a response wherein each response is received and evaluatedrelative to a predetermined standard before the next question is selected;
accumulating at least some of the results of the evaluations in a computer storage unit in computer readable form;
processing the results to automatically produce a specific sequence of instructional units in response to those responses which varied materially from the respective standard; and presenting the sequence of instructional units on a display for the individual wherein the individual can interact with each of the units via the display.
storing in a computer readable database a plurality of questions directed toward assessing an individual's understanding of a selected learning objective for each member of a plurality of different learning objectives;
automatically evaluating the individual by randomly and sequentially selected from the database at least one question associated with each member of the plurality of learning objectives and displaying each selected question to the individual for a response wherein each response is received and evaluatedrelative to a predetermined standard before the next question is selected;
accumulating at least some of the results of the evaluations in a computer storage unit in computer readable form;
processing the results to automatically produce a specific sequence of instructional units in response to those responses which varied materially from the respective standard; and presenting the sequence of instructional units on a display for the individual wherein the individual can interact with each of the units via the display.
2. A method as in claim 1 wherein in storing step, at least some of the questions are linked to a plurality of possible answers and in the displaying step, at least the selected question and the plurality of possible answers are displayed.
3. A method as in claim 1 wherein in the storing step, some of the questions are stored in a form which directs the individual to achieve a specified result without specifying the actions to be taken.
4. A method as in claim 1 which includes presenting a performance evaluating test, subsequent to presenting the sequence of instructional units.
5. An apparatus for providing an automatic, paperless, individualized learning sequence to a user comprising:
a programmable processor;
a visual display coupled to the processor;
a unit coupled to the processor, for reading control information and a database from a medium and providing that information to the processor andwherein, in response to that information, the processor accesses the database and wherein the processor includes circuitry for randomly selecting from the database a plurality of assessment questions and circuitry for presenting the plurality of questions to the user on the display;
a user operable input device coupled to the processor, whereby the user provides responses to the processor to at least some of the assessment questions and wherein the processor includes further circuitry for evaluating the responses and in response thereto for establishing a sequence of selected topics for presentation to the user.
a programmable processor;
a visual display coupled to the processor;
a unit coupled to the processor, for reading control information and a database from a medium and providing that information to the processor andwherein, in response to that information, the processor accesses the database and wherein the processor includes circuitry for randomly selecting from the database a plurality of assessment questions and circuitry for presenting the plurality of questions to the user on the display;
a user operable input device coupled to the processor, whereby the user provides responses to the processor to at least some of the assessment questions and wherein the processor includes further circuitry for evaluating the responses and in response thereto for establishing a sequence of selected topics for presentation to the user.
6. A system as in claim 5 wherein the processor includes further circuitry for presenting the sequence of selected topics to the user.
7. A system as in claim 6 wherein the processor includes further circuitry for reading from the database a post-test and circuitry for presenting the post test to the user.
8. An individualized, paperless, learning system comprising:
a database of different learning objects;
a control unit with circuitry for enabling a user to select an individual sequence of learning objects from the database;
a display unit coupled to the control unit whereat the control unit is adapted to display the individual sequence of learning objects.
a database of different learning objects;
a control unit with circuitry for enabling a user to select an individual sequence of learning objects from the database;
a display unit coupled to the control unit whereat the control unit is adapted to display the individual sequence of learning objects.
9. A system as in claim 8 wherein the control unit includes circuitry for linking the objects in the individual sequence.
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US08/738,038 US6039575A (en) | 1996-10-24 | 1996-10-24 | Interactive learning system with pretest |
US08/738,038 | 1996-10-24 |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
CA2219262A1 true CA2219262A1 (en) | 1998-04-24 |
Family
ID=24966316
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
CA002219262A Abandoned CA2219262A1 (en) | 1996-10-24 | 1997-10-23 | Interactive learning system with pretest |
Country Status (7)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (1) | US6039575A (en) |
EP (1) | EP0838798A1 (en) |
JP (1) | JPH10207335A (en) |
AU (1) | AU4284097A (en) |
CA (1) | CA2219262A1 (en) |
SG (1) | SG70038A1 (en) |
ZA (1) | ZA979459B (en) |
Families Citing this family (269)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US7835989B1 (en) | 1992-12-09 | 2010-11-16 | Discovery Communications, Inc. | Electronic book alternative delivery systems |
US7168084B1 (en) | 1992-12-09 | 2007-01-23 | Sedna Patent Services, Llc | Method and apparatus for targeting virtual objects |
US7509270B1 (en) | 1992-12-09 | 2009-03-24 | Discovery Communications, Inc. | Electronic Book having electronic commerce features |
US9286294B2 (en) | 1992-12-09 | 2016-03-15 | Comcast Ip Holdings I, Llc | Video and digital multimedia aggregator content suggestion engine |
ATE183352T1 (en) | 1992-12-09 | 1999-08-15 | Discovery Communicat Inc | IMPROVED TOP-UP TERMINAL FOR CABLE TELEVISION DISTRIBUTION SYSTEMS |
US8073695B1 (en) | 1992-12-09 | 2011-12-06 | Adrea, LLC | Electronic book with voice emulation features |
US7849393B1 (en) | 1992-12-09 | 2010-12-07 | Discovery Communications, Inc. | Electronic book connection to world watch live |
US7865567B1 (en) | 1993-12-02 | 2011-01-04 | Discovery Patent Holdings, Llc | Virtual on-demand electronic book |
US8095949B1 (en) | 1993-12-02 | 2012-01-10 | Adrea, LLC | Electronic book with restricted access features |
US7861166B1 (en) | 1993-12-02 | 2010-12-28 | Discovery Patent Holding, Llc | Resizing document pages to fit available hardware screens |
US9053640B1 (en) | 1993-12-02 | 2015-06-09 | Adrea, LLC | Interactive electronic book |
US6688888B1 (en) * | 1996-03-19 | 2004-02-10 | Chi Fai Ho | Computer-aided learning system and method |
US8861707B2 (en) * | 1996-05-31 | 2014-10-14 | Verint Americas Inc. | Method and apparatus for simultaneously monitoring computer user screen and telephone activity from a remote location |
US5944530A (en) * | 1996-08-13 | 1999-08-31 | Ho; Chi Fai | Learning method and system that consider a student's concentration level |
US20030198930A1 (en) * | 1997-09-24 | 2003-10-23 | Sylvan Learning Systems, Inc. | System and method for conducting a learning session based on a teacher privilege |
US8342854B2 (en) * | 1996-09-25 | 2013-01-01 | Educate Online Technology, Llc | Language-based computer generated instructional material |
BR9713230A (en) * | 1996-09-25 | 2000-04-04 | Sylvan Learning Systems Inc | System for electronic sending of instruction and automatic application of test and student management |
US6039575A (en) | 1996-10-24 | 2000-03-21 | National Education Corporation | Interactive learning system with pretest |
US8745493B2 (en) * | 1996-10-25 | 2014-06-03 | Karen A. McKirchy | Method and apparatus for providing instructional help, at multiple levels of sophistication, in a learning application |
US6270351B1 (en) * | 1997-05-16 | 2001-08-07 | Mci Communications Corporation | Individual education program tracking system |
US6347943B1 (en) * | 1997-10-20 | 2002-02-19 | Vuepoint Corporation | Method and system for creating an individualized course of instruction for each user |
US6195528B1 (en) | 1997-12-09 | 2001-02-27 | Tokheim Corporation | Teaching method and system |
USRE38432E1 (en) | 1998-01-29 | 2004-02-24 | Ho Chi Fai | Computer-aided group-learning methods and systems |
US6285993B1 (en) * | 1998-06-01 | 2001-09-04 | Raytheon Company | Method and apparatus for modeling individual learning styles |
GB2338333B (en) * | 1998-06-09 | 2003-02-26 | Aubrey Nunes | Computer assisted learning system |
US6882824B2 (en) | 1998-06-10 | 2005-04-19 | Leapfrog Enterprises, Inc. | Interactive teaching toy |
US6801751B1 (en) * | 1999-11-30 | 2004-10-05 | Leapfrog Enterprises, Inc. | Interactive learning appliance |
US9792659B2 (en) * | 1999-04-13 | 2017-10-17 | Iplearn, Llc | Computer-aided methods and apparatus to access materials in a network environment |
US6398556B1 (en) * | 1998-07-06 | 2002-06-04 | Chi Fai Ho | Inexpensive computer-aided learning methods and apparatus for learners |
EP1118069A2 (en) * | 1998-09-04 | 2001-07-25 | N.V. de Wilde CBT | Apparatus and method for personalized language exercise generation |
US6287123B1 (en) * | 1998-09-08 | 2001-09-11 | O'brien Denis Richard | Computer managed learning system and data processing method therefore |
US6149441A (en) * | 1998-11-06 | 2000-11-21 | Technology For Connecticut, Inc. | Computer-based educational system |
DE19852896A1 (en) | 1998-11-17 | 2000-05-18 | Alcatel Sa | Process for the automatic creation and monitoring of a schedule for a learning course by a computer |
DE19852937A1 (en) * | 1998-11-17 | 2000-05-18 | Alcatel Sa | Process for the automatic monitoring of the achievement of learning goals by a computer |
DE19852938A1 (en) * | 1998-11-17 | 2000-05-18 | Alcatel Sa | Process for the automatic selection and compilation of a learning course by a computer |
US6782374B2 (en) * | 1998-12-22 | 2004-08-24 | Accenture Global Services Gmbh | System, method and article of manufacturing for a runtime program analysis tool for a simulation engine |
US6542880B2 (en) * | 1998-12-22 | 2003-04-01 | Indeliq, Inc. | System, method and article of manufacture for a goal based system utilizing a table based architecture |
US6301462B1 (en) * | 1999-01-15 | 2001-10-09 | Unext. Com | Online collaborative apprenticeship |
US7194444B1 (en) * | 1999-02-08 | 2007-03-20 | Indeliq, Inc. | Goal based flow of a control presentation system |
US9053500B2 (en) * | 1999-06-30 | 2015-06-09 | Blackboard Inc. | Internet-based education support system and method with multi-language capability |
AUPQ139099A0 (en) * | 1999-07-02 | 1999-07-29 | Link Resources (Qld) Pty Ltd | Interactive training system |
US6282404B1 (en) * | 1999-09-22 | 2001-08-28 | Chet D. Linton | Method and system for accessing multimedia data in an interactive format having reporting capabilities |
US20050175971A1 (en) * | 1999-11-16 | 2005-08-11 | Knowlagent, Inc., Alpharetta, Ga | Method and system for scheduled delivery of training to call center agents |
US20040202309A1 (en) * | 1999-11-16 | 2004-10-14 | Knowlagent, Inc. | Managing the rate of delivering performance interventions in a contact center |
US20040202308A1 (en) * | 1999-11-16 | 2004-10-14 | Knowlagent, Inc. | Managing the selection of performance interventions in a contact center |
US20060233346A1 (en) * | 1999-11-16 | 2006-10-19 | Knowlagent, Inc. | Method and system for prioritizing performance interventions |
US9520069B2 (en) * | 1999-11-30 | 2016-12-13 | Leapfrog Enterprises, Inc. | Method and system for providing content for learning appliances over an electronic communication medium |
US9640083B1 (en) | 2002-02-26 | 2017-05-02 | Leapfrog Enterprises, Inc. | Method and system for providing content for learning appliances over an electronic communication medium |
WO2001043107A1 (en) * | 1999-12-08 | 2001-06-14 | Intelliprep Technologies, Inc. | Computer-based, interactive learning method and system |
US6652283B1 (en) * | 1999-12-30 | 2003-11-25 | Cerego, Llc | System apparatus and method for maximizing effectiveness and efficiency of learning retaining and retrieving knowledge and skills |
US6546230B1 (en) * | 1999-12-31 | 2003-04-08 | General Electric Company | Method and apparatus for skills assessment and online training |
US6681098B2 (en) * | 2000-01-11 | 2004-01-20 | Performance Assessment Network, Inc. | Test administration system using the internet |
US7899180B2 (en) * | 2000-01-13 | 2011-03-01 | Verint Systems Inc. | System and method for analysing communications streams |
GB0000735D0 (en) | 2000-01-13 | 2000-03-08 | Eyretel Ltd | System and method for analysing communication streams |
US7509263B1 (en) * | 2000-01-20 | 2009-03-24 | Epocrates, Inc. | Method and system for providing current industry specific data to physicians |
US6775377B2 (en) | 2001-09-10 | 2004-08-10 | Knowlagent, Inc. | Method and system for delivery of individualized training to call center agents |
WO2001067423A1 (en) * | 2000-03-10 | 2001-09-13 | Ims Learning A/S | A method for interactively monitoring and changing the behavior, attitude or educational state of an individual, in particular an individual related to an organization |
WO2001071695A1 (en) * | 2000-03-22 | 2001-09-27 | Virtual Gold, Inc. | Data-driven self-training system and technique |
US6419496B1 (en) * | 2000-03-28 | 2002-07-16 | William Vaughan, Jr. | Learning method |
US6438353B1 (en) * | 2000-03-29 | 2002-08-20 | General Electric | Method, system and storage medium for providing training to multiple users |
JP3818825B2 (en) * | 2000-04-14 | 2006-09-06 | アイリス株式会社 | System for providing individual learning plan for learners using communication network |
US6539269B1 (en) * | 2000-05-05 | 2003-03-25 | Payless Shoesource, Inc. | System and method for performance support |
US7043193B1 (en) | 2000-05-09 | 2006-05-09 | Knowlagent, Inc. | Versatile resource computer-based training system |
US6594466B1 (en) * | 2000-05-24 | 2003-07-15 | Bentley Systems, Incorporated | Method and system for computer based training |
US7085800B2 (en) * | 2000-06-01 | 2006-08-01 | Annette M. Abbott | Comprehensive system, process and article of manufacture to facilitate institutional, regulatory and individual continuing education requirements via a communications network |
WO2001095291A1 (en) * | 2000-06-02 | 2001-12-13 | Logilent Learning Systems, Inc. | An electronic learning system for remote use |
EP1297517A2 (en) | 2000-06-30 | 2003-04-02 | University Of Florida | Method, system, and apparatus for medical device training |
TW470904B (en) * | 2000-07-28 | 2002-01-01 | Inventec Corp | Interactive instruction system and method |
US6622003B1 (en) | 2000-08-14 | 2003-09-16 | Unext.Com Llc | Method for developing or providing an electronic course |
US20110070567A1 (en) * | 2000-08-31 | 2011-03-24 | Chet Linton | System for professional development training, assessment, and automated follow-up |
US7325190B1 (en) | 2000-10-02 | 2008-01-29 | Boehmer Tiffany D | Interface system and method of building rules and constraints for a resource scheduling system |
US6921268B2 (en) * | 2002-04-03 | 2005-07-26 | Knowledge Factor, Inc. | Method and system for knowledge assessment and learning incorporating feedbacks |
CA2425166C (en) * | 2000-10-04 | 2013-04-02 | James E. Bruno | Method and system for knowledge assessment and learning |
US8165518B2 (en) * | 2000-10-04 | 2012-04-24 | Knowledge Factor, Inc. | Method and system for knowledge assessment using confidence-based measurement |
AU2002234014A1 (en) * | 2000-10-30 | 2002-05-15 | Harvard Business School Publishing | System and method for network-based personalized educational environment |
US7260355B2 (en) * | 2000-11-02 | 2007-08-21 | Skillsoft Corporation | Automated individualized learning program creation system and associated methods |
US6606480B1 (en) * | 2000-11-02 | 2003-08-12 | National Education Training Group, Inc. | Automated system and method for creating an individualized learning program |
US6551107B1 (en) | 2000-11-03 | 2003-04-22 | Cardioconcepts, Inc. | Systems and methods for web-based learning |
US6704541B1 (en) | 2000-12-06 | 2004-03-09 | Unext.Com, L.L.C. | Method and system for tracking the progress of students in a class |
US6652287B1 (en) | 2000-12-21 | 2003-11-25 | Unext.Com | Administrator and instructor course management application for an online education course |
GB0103381D0 (en) * | 2001-02-12 | 2001-03-28 | Eyretel Ltd | Packet data recording method and system |
JP2004525410A (en) * | 2001-02-28 | 2004-08-19 | シスコ・ラーニング・インスティテュート | Distributed learning system |
US6978115B2 (en) * | 2001-03-29 | 2005-12-20 | Pointecast Corporation | Method and system for training in an adaptive manner |
US8015042B2 (en) * | 2001-04-02 | 2011-09-06 | Verint Americas Inc. | Methods for long-range contact center staff planning utilizing discrete event simulation |
US7155399B2 (en) | 2001-04-03 | 2006-12-26 | Witness Systems, Inc. | System and method for complex schedule generation |
US6952732B2 (en) | 2001-04-30 | 2005-10-04 | Blue Pumpkin Software, Inc. | Method and apparatus for multi-contact scheduling |
US6789047B1 (en) | 2001-04-17 | 2004-09-07 | Unext.Com Llc | Method and system for evaluating the performance of an instructor of an electronic course |
US6959405B2 (en) | 2001-04-18 | 2005-10-25 | Blue Pumpkin Software, Inc. | Method and system for concurrent error identification in resource scheduling |
US7210938B2 (en) * | 2001-05-09 | 2007-05-01 | K12.Com | System and method of virtual schooling |
US20020188583A1 (en) * | 2001-05-25 | 2002-12-12 | Mark Rukavina | E-learning tool for dynamically rendering course content |
US6533583B1 (en) | 2001-06-18 | 2003-03-18 | Victoria C. Sportelli | Instructional plan generating and monitoring system |
US6790045B1 (en) | 2001-06-18 | 2004-09-14 | Unext.Com Llc | Method and system for analyzing student performance in an electronic course |
US6644974B2 (en) | 2001-07-24 | 2003-11-11 | International Business Machines Corporation | Educational process that produces deliverable document |
JP2003044597A (en) * | 2001-07-26 | 2003-02-14 | Honda Motor Co Ltd | Assistance system for comprehensive learning |
US7793326B2 (en) | 2001-08-03 | 2010-09-07 | Comcast Ip Holdings I, Llc | Video and digital multimedia aggregator |
US7908628B2 (en) | 2001-08-03 | 2011-03-15 | Comcast Ip Holdings I, Llc | Video and digital multimedia aggregator content coding and formatting |
US20030039948A1 (en) * | 2001-08-09 | 2003-02-27 | Donahue Steven J. | Voice enabled tutorial system and method |
US20030055699A1 (en) * | 2001-09-18 | 2003-03-20 | O'connor Joseph J. | Employee development management method and system |
US20030064354A1 (en) * | 2001-09-28 | 2003-04-03 | Lewis Daniel M. | System and method for linking content standards, curriculum, instructions and assessment |
US10347145B1 (en) | 2001-10-05 | 2019-07-09 | Vision Works Ip Corporation | Method and apparatus for periodically questioning a user using a computer system or other device to facilitate memorization and learning of information |
US6999954B2 (en) | 2001-10-10 | 2006-02-14 | The Mcgraw-Hill Companies, Inc. | Modular instruction using cognitive constructs |
US7174010B2 (en) * | 2001-11-05 | 2007-02-06 | Knowlagent, Inc. | System and method for increasing completion of training |
US6895213B1 (en) * | 2001-12-03 | 2005-05-17 | Einstruction Corporation | System and method for communicating with students in an education environment |
US20030104344A1 (en) * | 2001-12-03 | 2003-06-05 | Sable Paula H. | Structured observation system for early literacy assessment |
US20030163784A1 (en) * | 2001-12-12 | 2003-08-28 | Accenture Global Services Gmbh | Compiling and distributing modular electronic publishing and electronic instruction materials |
US7052277B2 (en) | 2001-12-14 | 2006-05-30 | Kellman A.C.T. Services, Inc. | System and method for adaptive learning |
AU2002360231B2 (en) * | 2001-12-21 | 2008-07-24 | Verb7 Limited | Synchronised formative learning system, method, and computer program |
US20030130972A1 (en) * | 2002-01-10 | 2003-07-10 | Holt Laurence E. | Learning by knowledge division into atoms and combination of atoms into payoffs |
US9008300B2 (en) | 2002-01-28 | 2015-04-14 | Verint Americas Inc | Complex recording trigger |
US7219138B2 (en) | 2002-01-31 | 2007-05-15 | Witness Systems, Inc. | Method, apparatus, and system for capturing data exchanged between a server and a user |
US7424715B1 (en) | 2002-01-28 | 2008-09-09 | Verint Americas Inc. | Method and system for presenting events associated with recorded data exchanged between a server and a user |
US7149788B1 (en) * | 2002-01-28 | 2006-12-12 | Witness Systems, Inc. | Method and system for providing access to captured multimedia data from a multimedia player |
US20030142122A1 (en) * | 2002-01-31 | 2003-07-31 | Christopher Straut | Method, apparatus, and system for replaying data selected from among data captured during exchanges between a server and a user |
US20030145140A1 (en) * | 2002-01-31 | 2003-07-31 | Christopher Straut | Method, apparatus, and system for processing data captured during exchanges between a server and a user |
US7882212B1 (en) | 2002-01-28 | 2011-02-01 | Verint Systems Inc. | Methods and devices for archiving recorded interactions and retrieving stored recorded interactions |
US20030172108A1 (en) * | 2002-03-05 | 2003-09-11 | Joshua Paul | System for providing multimedia file |
US20030190590A1 (en) * | 2002-04-08 | 2003-10-09 | The Florida State University Research Foundation | Personal information presentation system and method |
US7415605B2 (en) * | 2002-05-21 | 2008-08-19 | Bio-Key International, Inc. | Biometric identification network security |
CA2486798A1 (en) * | 2002-05-22 | 2003-12-04 | Blackboard Inc. | Internet-based education support system and method with multi-language capability |
GB2390734A (en) * | 2002-07-10 | 2004-01-14 | Learning Expanse Ltd | Learning management system |
US8128414B1 (en) | 2002-08-20 | 2012-03-06 | Ctb/Mcgraw-Hill | System and method for the development of instructional and testing materials |
GB0219493D0 (en) | 2002-08-21 | 2002-10-02 | Eyretel Plc | Method and system for communications monitoring |
PL355770A1 (en) * | 2002-08-29 | 2004-03-08 | Jerzy Kalisiak | Tele-education system |
US8523575B2 (en) * | 2002-09-02 | 2013-09-03 | Nextthinksoft Pty Ltd. | Recalling items of information |
US7367808B1 (en) * | 2002-09-10 | 2008-05-06 | Talentkeepers, Inc. | Employee retention system and associated methods |
US7646927B2 (en) * | 2002-09-19 | 2010-01-12 | Ricoh Company, Ltd. | Image processing and display scheme for rendering an image at high speed |
US20040076941A1 (en) * | 2002-10-16 | 2004-04-22 | Kaplan, Inc. | Online curriculum handling system including content assembly from structured storage of reusable components |
US20040115597A1 (en) * | 2002-12-11 | 2004-06-17 | Butt Thomas Giles | System and method of interactive learning using adaptive notes |
US20040267607A1 (en) * | 2002-12-13 | 2004-12-30 | American Payroll Association | Performance assessment system and associated method of interactively presenting assessment driven solution |
US20040202987A1 (en) * | 2003-02-14 | 2004-10-14 | Scheuring Sylvia Tidwell | System and method for creating, assessing, modifying, and using a learning map |
JP2004279808A (en) * | 2003-03-17 | 2004-10-07 | Univ Saga | Telelearning system |
JP2005024635A (en) * | 2003-06-30 | 2005-01-27 | Univ Shizuoka | Ability evaluation system, method and program for the same |
US7357640B2 (en) * | 2003-07-02 | 2008-04-15 | Drb Lit Ltd. | Lock-In Training system |
US20050003336A1 (en) * | 2003-07-02 | 2005-01-06 | Berman Dennis R. | Method and system for learning keyword based materials |
US7695284B1 (en) * | 2003-07-11 | 2010-04-13 | Vernon Mears | System and method for educating using multimedia interface |
US20110159472A1 (en) * | 2003-07-15 | 2011-06-30 | Hagen Eck | Delivery methods for remote learning system courses |
WO2005017688A2 (en) * | 2003-08-11 | 2005-02-24 | George Dale Grayson | Method and apparatus for teaching |
US7158628B2 (en) * | 2003-08-20 | 2007-01-02 | Knowlagent, Inc. | Method and system for selecting a preferred contact center agent based on agent proficiency and performance and contact center state |
WO2005078681A2 (en) * | 2004-02-17 | 2005-08-25 | Thru-U.Com Limited | An e-learning system and method |
US20050186550A1 (en) * | 2004-02-23 | 2005-08-25 | Mubina Gillani | System and method for dynamic electronic learning based on continuing student assessments and responses |
US7364432B2 (en) * | 2004-03-31 | 2008-04-29 | Drb Lit Ltd. | Methods of selecting Lock-In Training courses and sessions |
US7980855B1 (en) | 2004-05-21 | 2011-07-19 | Ctb/Mcgraw-Hill | Student reporting systems and methods |
US8554130B1 (en) * | 2004-09-15 | 2013-10-08 | Cadence Design Systems, Inc. | Method and apparatus to provide machine-assisted training |
US20060063139A1 (en) * | 2004-09-23 | 2006-03-23 | Carver Ronald P | Computer assisted reading tutor apparatus and method |
US20060072739A1 (en) * | 2004-10-01 | 2006-04-06 | Knowlagent Inc. | Method and system for assessing and deploying personnel for roles in a contact center |
US20060188862A1 (en) * | 2005-02-18 | 2006-08-24 | Harcourt Assessment, Inc. | Electronic assessment summary and remedial action plan creation system and associated methods |
US20060246411A1 (en) * | 2005-04-27 | 2006-11-02 | Yang Steven P | Learning apparatus and method |
US20060256953A1 (en) * | 2005-05-12 | 2006-11-16 | Knowlagent, Inc. | Method and system for improving workforce performance in a contact center |
US8170466B2 (en) * | 2005-05-27 | 2012-05-01 | Ctb/Mcgraw-Hill | System and method for automated assessment of constrained constructed responses |
US20070009871A1 (en) * | 2005-05-28 | 2007-01-11 | Ctb/Mcgraw-Hill | System and method for improved cumulative assessment |
US20070031801A1 (en) * | 2005-06-16 | 2007-02-08 | Ctb Mcgraw Hill | Patterned response system and method |
US20070048710A1 (en) * | 2005-08-09 | 2007-03-01 | The University Of North Dakota | Bioterrorism and disaster response system |
US20070122790A1 (en) * | 2005-10-24 | 2007-05-31 | Sperle Robin U | Monitoring progress of external course |
US20070111184A1 (en) * | 2005-10-24 | 2007-05-17 | Sperle Robin U | External booking cancellation |
US7516274B2 (en) * | 2005-11-15 | 2009-04-07 | Sun Microsystems, Inc. | Power conservation via DRAM access reduction |
US20070281287A1 (en) * | 2006-01-05 | 2007-12-06 | Marioneaux Harold J Jr | Systems and methods for monitoring and improving academic, training or business performance |
US7864946B1 (en) | 2006-02-22 | 2011-01-04 | Verint Americas Inc. | Systems and methods for scheduling call center agents using quality data and correlation-based discovery |
US8160233B2 (en) * | 2006-02-22 | 2012-04-17 | Verint Americas Inc. | System and method for detecting and displaying business transactions |
US8117064B2 (en) * | 2006-02-22 | 2012-02-14 | Verint Americas, Inc. | Systems and methods for workforce optimization and analytics |
US8670552B2 (en) * | 2006-02-22 | 2014-03-11 | Verint Systems, Inc. | System and method for integrated display of multiple types of call agent data |
US8108237B2 (en) * | 2006-02-22 | 2012-01-31 | Verint Americas, Inc. | Systems for integrating contact center monitoring, training and scheduling |
US8112298B2 (en) * | 2006-02-22 | 2012-02-07 | Verint Americas, Inc. | Systems and methods for workforce optimization |
US8112306B2 (en) * | 2006-02-22 | 2012-02-07 | Verint Americas, Inc. | System and method for facilitating triggers and workflows in workforce optimization |
US7853006B1 (en) | 2006-02-22 | 2010-12-14 | Verint Americas Inc. | Systems and methods for scheduling call center agents using quality data and correlation-based discovery |
US20070206767A1 (en) * | 2006-02-22 | 2007-09-06 | Witness Systems, Inc. | System and method for integrated display of recorded interactions and call agent data |
US7734783B1 (en) | 2006-03-21 | 2010-06-08 | Verint Americas Inc. | Systems and methods for determining allocations for distributed multi-site contact centers |
US8126134B1 (en) | 2006-03-30 | 2012-02-28 | Verint Americas, Inc. | Systems and methods for scheduling of outbound agents |
US7826608B1 (en) | 2006-03-31 | 2010-11-02 | Verint Americas Inc. | Systems and methods for calculating workforce staffing statistics |
US8000465B2 (en) * | 2006-03-31 | 2011-08-16 | Verint Americas, Inc. | Systems and methods for endpoint recording using gateways |
US7672746B1 (en) | 2006-03-31 | 2010-03-02 | Verint Americas Inc. | Systems and methods for automatic scheduling of a workforce |
US8204056B2 (en) | 2006-03-31 | 2012-06-19 | Verint Americas, Inc. | Systems and methods for endpoint recording using a media application server |
US20080008296A1 (en) * | 2006-03-31 | 2008-01-10 | Vernit Americas Inc. | Data Capture in a Distributed Network |
US7995612B2 (en) * | 2006-03-31 | 2011-08-09 | Verint Americas, Inc. | Systems and methods for capturing communication signals [32-bit or 128-bit addresses] |
US8130938B2 (en) * | 2006-03-31 | 2012-03-06 | Verint Americas, Inc. | Systems and methods for endpoint recording using recorders |
US7680264B2 (en) * | 2006-03-31 | 2010-03-16 | Verint Americas Inc. | Systems and methods for endpoint recording using a conference bridge |
US8442033B2 (en) * | 2006-03-31 | 2013-05-14 | Verint Americas, Inc. | Distributed voice over internet protocol recording |
US8254262B1 (en) | 2006-03-31 | 2012-08-28 | Verint Americas, Inc. | Passive recording and load balancing |
US7774854B1 (en) | 2006-03-31 | 2010-08-10 | Verint Americas Inc. | Systems and methods for protecting information |
US7701972B1 (en) * | 2006-03-31 | 2010-04-20 | Verint Americas Inc. | Internet protocol analyzing |
US7792278B2 (en) | 2006-03-31 | 2010-09-07 | Verint Americas Inc. | Integration of contact center surveys |
US7852994B1 (en) | 2006-03-31 | 2010-12-14 | Verint Americas Inc. | Systems and methods for recording audio |
US7822018B2 (en) * | 2006-03-31 | 2010-10-26 | Verint Americas Inc. | Duplicate media stream |
US8594313B2 (en) | 2006-03-31 | 2013-11-26 | Verint Systems, Inc. | Systems and methods for endpoint recording using phones |
US7633930B2 (en) | 2006-03-31 | 2009-12-15 | Verint Americas Inc. | Systems and methods for capturing multimedia communication signals |
US20070237525A1 (en) * | 2006-03-31 | 2007-10-11 | Witness Systems, Inc. | Systems and methods for modular capturing various communication signals |
US8155275B1 (en) | 2006-04-03 | 2012-04-10 | Verint Americas, Inc. | Systems and methods for managing alarms from recorders |
US8331549B2 (en) * | 2006-05-01 | 2012-12-11 | Verint Americas Inc. | System and method for integrated workforce and quality management |
US8396732B1 (en) | 2006-05-08 | 2013-03-12 | Verint Americas Inc. | System and method for integrated workforce and analytics |
US20070282807A1 (en) * | 2006-05-10 | 2007-12-06 | John Ringelman | Systems and methods for contact center analysis |
US7817795B2 (en) * | 2006-05-10 | 2010-10-19 | Verint Americas, Inc. | Systems and methods for data synchronization in a customer center |
US20070298404A1 (en) * | 2006-06-09 | 2007-12-27 | Training Masters, Inc. | Interactive presentation system and method |
US7747745B2 (en) * | 2006-06-16 | 2010-06-29 | Almondnet, Inc. | Media properties selection method and system based on expected profit from profile-based ad delivery |
US7660407B2 (en) | 2006-06-27 | 2010-02-09 | Verint Americas Inc. | Systems and methods for scheduling contact center agents |
US7660406B2 (en) * | 2006-06-27 | 2010-02-09 | Verint Americas Inc. | Systems and methods for integrating outsourcers |
US20070297578A1 (en) * | 2006-06-27 | 2007-12-27 | Witness Systems, Inc. | Hybrid recording of communications |
US7903568B2 (en) | 2006-06-29 | 2011-03-08 | Verint Americas Inc. | Systems and methods for providing recording as a network service |
US7660307B2 (en) * | 2006-06-29 | 2010-02-09 | Verint Americas Inc. | Systems and methods for providing recording as a network service |
US7953621B2 (en) | 2006-06-30 | 2011-05-31 | Verint Americas Inc. | Systems and methods for displaying agent activity exceptions |
US8131578B2 (en) * | 2006-06-30 | 2012-03-06 | Verint Americas Inc. | Systems and methods for automatic scheduling of a workforce |
US7853800B2 (en) | 2006-06-30 | 2010-12-14 | Verint Americas Inc. | Systems and methods for a secure recording environment |
US7848524B2 (en) * | 2006-06-30 | 2010-12-07 | Verint Americas Inc. | Systems and methods for a secure recording environment |
US20080004945A1 (en) * | 2006-06-30 | 2008-01-03 | Joe Watson | Automated scoring of interactions |
US7881471B2 (en) * | 2006-06-30 | 2011-02-01 | Verint Systems Inc. | Systems and methods for recording an encrypted interaction |
US7966397B2 (en) * | 2006-06-30 | 2011-06-21 | Verint Americas Inc. | Distributive data capture |
US7769176B2 (en) * | 2006-06-30 | 2010-08-03 | Verint Americas Inc. | Systems and methods for a secure recording environment |
US20080052535A1 (en) * | 2006-06-30 | 2008-02-28 | Witness Systems, Inc. | Systems and Methods for Recording Encrypted Interactions |
US20080038705A1 (en) * | 2006-07-14 | 2008-02-14 | Kerns Daniel R | System and method for assessing student progress and delivering appropriate content |
US10347148B2 (en) * | 2006-07-14 | 2019-07-09 | Dreambox Learning, Inc. | System and method for adapting lessons to student needs |
US7818164B2 (en) | 2006-08-21 | 2010-10-19 | K12 Inc. | Method and system for teaching a foreign language |
US7869988B2 (en) | 2006-11-03 | 2011-01-11 | K12 Inc. | Group foreign language teaching system and method |
WO2008027528A2 (en) * | 2006-09-01 | 2008-03-06 | K12.Inc. | Multimedia system and method for teaching basal math and science |
US20080059484A1 (en) * | 2006-09-06 | 2008-03-06 | K12 Inc. | Multimedia system and method for teaching in a hybrid learning environment |
US7930314B2 (en) * | 2006-09-28 | 2011-04-19 | Verint Americas Inc. | Systems and methods for storing and searching data in a customer center environment |
US7953750B1 (en) * | 2006-09-28 | 2011-05-31 | Verint Americas, Inc. | Systems and methods for storing and searching data in a customer center environment |
US7965828B2 (en) | 2006-09-29 | 2011-06-21 | Verint Americas Inc. | Call control presence |
US7881216B2 (en) * | 2006-09-29 | 2011-02-01 | Verint Systems Inc. | Systems and methods for analyzing communication sessions using fragments |
US7899178B2 (en) | 2006-09-29 | 2011-03-01 | Verint Americas Inc. | Recording invocation of communication sessions |
US8645179B2 (en) * | 2006-09-29 | 2014-02-04 | Verint Americas Inc. | Systems and methods of partial shift swapping |
US7899176B1 (en) | 2006-09-29 | 2011-03-01 | Verint Americas Inc. | Systems and methods for discovering customer center information |
US20080082387A1 (en) * | 2006-09-29 | 2008-04-03 | Swati Tewari | Systems and methods or partial shift swapping |
US7885813B2 (en) * | 2006-09-29 | 2011-02-08 | Verint Systems Inc. | Systems and methods for analyzing communication sessions |
US8837697B2 (en) * | 2006-09-29 | 2014-09-16 | Verint Americas Inc. | Call control presence and recording |
US20080080685A1 (en) * | 2006-09-29 | 2008-04-03 | Witness Systems, Inc. | Systems and Methods for Recording in a Contact Center Environment |
US7991613B2 (en) | 2006-09-29 | 2011-08-02 | Verint Americas Inc. | Analyzing audio components and generating text with integrated additional session information |
US7920482B2 (en) | 2006-09-29 | 2011-04-05 | Verint Americas Inc. | Systems and methods for monitoring information corresponding to communication sessions |
US7613290B2 (en) * | 2006-09-29 | 2009-11-03 | Verint Americas Inc. | Recording using proxy servers |
US8199886B2 (en) * | 2006-09-29 | 2012-06-12 | Verint Americas, Inc. | Call control recording |
US8005676B2 (en) * | 2006-09-29 | 2011-08-23 | Verint Americas, Inc. | Speech analysis using statistical learning |
US7752043B2 (en) | 2006-09-29 | 2010-07-06 | Verint Americas Inc. | Multi-pass speech analytics |
US20080082492A1 (en) * | 2006-09-29 | 2008-04-03 | Compugroup Holding Ag | Data Processing System and Method for Computer Assisted Learning |
US7570755B2 (en) | 2006-09-29 | 2009-08-04 | Verint Americas Inc. | Routine communication sessions for recording |
US8068602B1 (en) | 2006-09-29 | 2011-11-29 | Verint Americas, Inc. | Systems and methods for recording using virtual machines |
US7873156B1 (en) | 2006-09-29 | 2011-01-18 | Verint Americas Inc. | Systems and methods for analyzing contact center interactions |
US20080102428A1 (en) * | 2006-10-25 | 2008-05-01 | Monitor Company Group Limited Partnership | System and Method for Providing a User-Centric Interactive Learning Environment |
US8130925B2 (en) * | 2006-12-08 | 2012-03-06 | Verint Americas, Inc. | Systems and methods for recording |
US8280011B2 (en) * | 2006-12-08 | 2012-10-02 | Verint Americas, Inc. | Recording in a distributed environment |
US8130926B2 (en) * | 2006-12-08 | 2012-03-06 | Verint Americas, Inc. | Systems and methods for recording data |
US20080166693A1 (en) * | 2006-11-27 | 2008-07-10 | Warren Stanton Gifford | Method and system for optimal learning |
US8281370B2 (en) * | 2006-11-27 | 2012-10-02 | Therap Services LLP | Managing secure sharing of private information across security domains |
US20080137814A1 (en) * | 2006-12-07 | 2008-06-12 | Jamie Richard Williams | Systems and Methods for Replaying Recorded Data |
US20080244686A1 (en) * | 2007-03-27 | 2008-10-02 | Witness Systems, Inc. | Systems and Methods for Enhancing Security of Files |
US8170184B2 (en) | 2007-03-30 | 2012-05-01 | Verint Americas, Inc. | Systems and methods for recording resource association in a recording environment |
US8437465B1 (en) | 2007-03-30 | 2013-05-07 | Verint Americas, Inc. | Systems and methods for capturing communications data |
US9106737B2 (en) * | 2007-03-30 | 2015-08-11 | Verint Americas, Inc. | Systems and methods for recording resource association for recording |
US8743730B2 (en) * | 2007-03-30 | 2014-06-03 | Verint Americas Inc. | Systems and methods for recording resource association for a communications environment |
US20080300963A1 (en) * | 2007-05-30 | 2008-12-04 | Krithika Seetharaman | System and Method for Long Term Forecasting |
US20080300955A1 (en) * | 2007-05-30 | 2008-12-04 | Edward Hamilton | System and Method for Multi-Week Scheduling |
US8315901B2 (en) * | 2007-05-30 | 2012-11-20 | Verint Systems Inc. | Systems and methods of automatically scheduling a workforce |
US8385812B2 (en) * | 2008-03-18 | 2013-02-26 | Jones International, Ltd. | Assessment-driven cognition system |
US8639177B2 (en) * | 2008-05-08 | 2014-01-28 | Microsoft Corporation | Learning assessment and programmatic remediation |
US8401155B1 (en) | 2008-05-23 | 2013-03-19 | Verint Americas, Inc. | Systems and methods for secure recording in a customer center environment |
US8727788B2 (en) * | 2008-06-27 | 2014-05-20 | Microsoft Corporation | Memorization optimization platform |
US20090325140A1 (en) * | 2008-06-30 | 2009-12-31 | Lou Gray | Method and system to adapt computer-based instruction based on heuristics |
US8719016B1 (en) | 2009-04-07 | 2014-05-06 | Verint Americas Inc. | Speech analytics system and system and method for determining structured speech |
IL199115A (en) * | 2009-06-03 | 2013-06-27 | Verint Systems Ltd | Systems and methods for efficient keyword spotting in communication traffic |
US8838015B2 (en) * | 2009-08-14 | 2014-09-16 | K12 Inc. | Systems and methods for producing, delivering and managing educational material |
US8768240B2 (en) * | 2009-08-14 | 2014-07-01 | K12 Inc. | Systems and methods for producing, delivering and managing educational material |
US20110039246A1 (en) * | 2009-08-14 | 2011-02-17 | Ronald Jay Packard | Systems and methods for producing, delivering and managing educational material |
US20110039249A1 (en) * | 2009-08-14 | 2011-02-17 | Ronald Jay Packard | Systems and methods for producing, delivering and managing educational material |
US10115065B1 (en) | 2009-10-30 | 2018-10-30 | Verint Americas Inc. | Systems and methods for automatic scheduling of a workforce |
BR112012017226A8 (en) | 2010-01-15 | 2018-06-26 | Apollo Group Inc | dynamic learning recommendation methods and computer readable non-transient storage media |
US20110320943A1 (en) * | 2010-06-29 | 2011-12-29 | Brainstorm, Inc. | Process and Apparatus for Computer Training |
WO2013025428A2 (en) | 2011-08-12 | 2013-02-21 | School Improvement Network, Llc | Prescription of electronic resources based on observational assessments |
US9575616B2 (en) | 2011-08-12 | 2017-02-21 | School Improvement Network, Llc | Educator effectiveness |
US9875663B2 (en) * | 2011-09-13 | 2018-01-23 | Monk Akarshala Design Private Limited | Personalized testing of learning application performance in a modular learning system |
US20130095461A1 (en) * | 2011-10-12 | 2013-04-18 | Satish Menon | Course skeleton for adaptive learning |
US20140193795A1 (en) * | 2012-08-01 | 2014-07-10 | You Can Learn, Inc. | Dynamic generation of electronic educational courses |
GB201215377D0 (en) | 2012-08-21 | 2012-10-10 | Colby Mark A | Collabration in a communications network |
US10776715B2 (en) | 2017-04-28 | 2020-09-15 | Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc | Artificial intelligent cognition threshold |
Family Cites Families (20)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US4798543A (en) | 1983-03-31 | 1989-01-17 | Bell & Howell Company | Interactive training method and system |
US4593904A (en) * | 1984-03-19 | 1986-06-10 | Syntech International, Inc. | Player interactive video gaming device |
US4867685A (en) * | 1987-09-24 | 1989-09-19 | The Trustees Of The College Of Aeronautics | Audio visual instructional system |
US5180309A (en) * | 1990-12-04 | 1993-01-19 | United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Navy | Automated answer evaluation and scoring system and method |
JPH04357549A (en) * | 1991-03-07 | 1992-12-10 | Hitachi Ltd | Education system |
US5437553A (en) * | 1991-04-08 | 1995-08-01 | Collins; Deborah L. | Method and apparatus for automated learning and performance evaluation |
US5395243A (en) * | 1991-09-25 | 1995-03-07 | National Education Training Group | Interactive learning system |
US5267865A (en) * | 1992-02-11 | 1993-12-07 | John R. Lee | Interactive computer aided natural learning method and apparatus |
US5446891A (en) * | 1992-02-26 | 1995-08-29 | International Business Machines Corporation | System for adjusting hypertext links with weighed user goals and activities |
US5302132A (en) * | 1992-04-01 | 1994-04-12 | Corder Paul R | Instructional system and method for improving communication skills |
US5692906A (en) * | 1992-04-01 | 1997-12-02 | Corder; Paul R. | Method of diagnosing and remediating a deficiency in communications skills |
JP3693691B2 (en) * | 1993-12-30 | 2005-09-07 | 株式会社リコー | Image processing device |
US5489213A (en) * | 1994-03-07 | 1996-02-06 | Makipaa; Juha | Method of and system for employee business conduct guidelines education |
US5700149A (en) * | 1994-06-03 | 1997-12-23 | Johnson, Iii; Oscar R. | Method of personal verification for an in-resident system for administrating course material |
US5618182A (en) * | 1994-09-30 | 1997-04-08 | Thomas; C. Douglass | Method and apparatus for improving performance on multiple-choice exams |
EP0710943A3 (en) * | 1994-11-04 | 1997-04-02 | At & T Global Inf Solution | A computer-assisted educational system |
DE69509473T2 (en) * | 1994-11-04 | 1999-10-28 | Ncr Int Inc | Computer aided training system for students |
US5749736A (en) * | 1995-03-22 | 1998-05-12 | Taras Development | Method and system for computerized learning, response, and evaluation |
US5802373A (en) * | 1996-01-29 | 1998-09-01 | Digital Equipment Corporation | Method for providing a pipeline interpreter for a variable length instruction set |
US6039575A (en) | 1996-10-24 | 2000-03-21 | National Education Corporation | Interactive learning system with pretest |
-
1996
- 1996-10-24 US US08/738,038 patent/US6039575A/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
-
1997
- 1997-10-22 ZA ZA9709459A patent/ZA979459B/en unknown
- 1997-10-23 CA CA002219262A patent/CA2219262A1/en not_active Abandoned
- 1997-10-23 AU AU42840/97A patent/AU4284097A/en not_active Abandoned
- 1997-10-23 SG SG1997003856A patent/SG70038A1/en unknown
- 1997-10-24 EP EP97308489A patent/EP0838798A1/en not_active Withdrawn
- 1997-10-24 JP JP9291904A patent/JPH10207335A/en not_active Abandoned
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
ZA979459B (en) | 1998-05-12 |
US6039575A (en) | 2000-03-21 |
JPH10207335A (en) | 1998-08-07 |
AU4284097A (en) | 1998-04-30 |
EP0838798A1 (en) | 1998-04-29 |
SG70038A1 (en) | 2000-01-25 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
CA2219262A1 (en) | Interactive learning system with pretest | |
Simpson | Evolution in the classroom: What teachers need to know about the video game generation | |
Pierson | Technology integration practice as a function of pedagogical expertise | |
US6514079B1 (en) | Interactive training method for demonstrating and teaching occupational skills | |
US20040009462A1 (en) | Learning system | |
US20070287518A1 (en) | Methods & apparatus for chess instruction | |
US20060204948A1 (en) | Method of training and rewarding employees | |
Cruickshank et al. | The Simulation and Analysis of Problems of Beginning Teachers. | |
US20020187462A1 (en) | Internet based teaching system | |
Chilcott | Effective use of simulations in the classroom | |
Schiffeler et al. | Escape (the traditional class-) room: Gamification and mixed reality in higher education | |
AU770473B2 (en) | Interactive learning systems with pretest | |
Bushnell et al. | A computer-based laboratory for automation in school systems | |
Sukamolson | Computerized test/item banking and computerized adaptive testing for teachers and lecturers | |
Paulson et al. | Methods of educating cashiers in a restaurant teaching laboratory | |
Russell | The audio-tutorial system | |
Green | Computer‐based adaptive testing in 1991 | |
Wilhelm-Weidner et al. | On supplementing theoretical computer science courses using E-learning | |
Taraban et al. | Developing a model of students' navigations in computer modules for introductory thermodynamics | |
Norton | USING PROGRAMED INSTRUCTION IN OCCUPATIONAL EDUCATION. | |
Armstrong | New approaches in the training and education of online users | |
Peterson | Mainstreaming training systems, materials, and resources: A working list | |
Kowalsky | Learning the Advocate's Art: Reflections on the Doctoral Defense in Law | |
JPH01158476A (en) | Different culture aptitude diagnosis system | |
Desrosiers | Performance support systems versus computer-based training |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
EEER | Examination request | ||
FZDE | Dead |