CA2387797A1 - Super directional beamforming design and implementation - Google Patents
Super directional beamforming design and implementation Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CA2387797A1 CA2387797A1 CA002387797A CA2387797A CA2387797A1 CA 2387797 A1 CA2387797 A1 CA 2387797A1 CA 002387797 A CA002387797 A CA 002387797A CA 2387797 A CA2387797 A CA 2387797A CA 2387797 A1 CA2387797 A1 CA 2387797A1
- Authority
- CA
- Canada
- Prior art keywords
- coefficients
- filter
- noise
- array
- outputs
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Abandoned
Links
Classifications
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H01—ELECTRIC ELEMENTS
- H01Q—ANTENNAS, i.e. RADIO AERIALS
- H01Q3/00—Arrangements for changing or varying the orientation or the shape of the directional pattern of the waves radiated from an antenna or antenna system
- H01Q3/26—Arrangements for changing or varying the orientation or the shape of the directional pattern of the waves radiated from an antenna or antenna system varying the relative phase or relative amplitude of energisation between two or more active radiating elements; varying the distribution of energy across a radiating aperture
- H01Q3/30—Arrangements for changing or varying the orientation or the shape of the directional pattern of the waves radiated from an antenna or antenna system varying the relative phase or relative amplitude of energisation between two or more active radiating elements; varying the distribution of energy across a radiating aperture varying the relative phase between the radiating elements of an array
- H01Q3/34—Arrangements for changing or varying the orientation or the shape of the directional pattern of the waves radiated from an antenna or antenna system varying the relative phase or relative amplitude of energisation between two or more active radiating elements; varying the distribution of energy across a radiating aperture varying the relative phase between the radiating elements of an array by electrical means
- H01Q3/40—Arrangements for changing or varying the orientation or the shape of the directional pattern of the waves radiated from an antenna or antenna system varying the relative phase or relative amplitude of energisation between two or more active radiating elements; varying the distribution of energy across a radiating aperture varying the relative phase between the radiating elements of an array by electrical means with phasing matrix
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G10—MUSICAL INSTRUMENTS; ACOUSTICS
- G10K—SOUND-PRODUCING DEVICES; METHODS OR DEVICES FOR PROTECTING AGAINST, OR FOR DAMPING, NOISE OR OTHER ACOUSTIC WAVES IN GENERAL; ACOUSTICS NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G10K11/00—Methods or devices for transmitting, conducting or directing sound in general; Methods or devices for protecting against, or for damping, noise or other acoustic waves in general
- G10K11/18—Methods or devices for transmitting, conducting or directing sound
- G10K11/26—Sound-focusing or directing, e.g. scanning
- G10K11/34—Sound-focusing or directing, e.g. scanning using electrical steering of transducer arrays, e.g. beam steering
- G10K11/341—Circuits therefor
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H01—ELECTRIC ELEMENTS
- H01Q—ANTENNAS, i.e. RADIO AERIALS
- H01Q25/00—Antennas or antenna systems providing at least two radiating patterns
Landscapes
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Acoustics & Sound (AREA)
- Multimedia (AREA)
- Circuit For Audible Band Transducer (AREA)
- Measurement Of Velocity Or Position Using Acoustic Or Ultrasonic Waves (AREA)
- Transducers For Ultrasonic Waves (AREA)
- Filters That Use Time-Delay Elements (AREA)
Abstract
A sensor array (10 sub.1-N) receiving system which incorporates one or more filters (16 sub.1-N) that are capable of adaptive and/or fixed operation. Th e filters are defined by a multiple of coefficients and the coefficients are s et so as to maximize the signal to noise ratio of the receiving array's output. In one preferred embodiment, the filter coefficients are adaptively determin ed and are faded into a predetermined group of fixed values upon the occurrence of a specified event. Thereby, allowing the sensor array (10 sub.1-N) to operate in both the adaptive and fixed modes, and providing the array with t he ability to employ the mode most favorable for a given operating environment. In another preferred embodiment, the filter coefficients are set to a fixed group of values which are determined to be optimal for a predefined noise environment.
Description
SUPER DIRECTIONAL BEAMFORMING DESIGN AND IMPLEMENTATION
Cross-reference to Related Applications This application is related to application U.S. Serial No.: , by Andrea et al., filed on October 22, 1999 and entitled System and Method for Adaptive Interference Canceling (Attorney Docket No.
7010), hereby incorporated by reference.
Field of the Invention This invention relates to signal processing, and more particularly, to processing the signals received by an array of sensors in order to minimize the amount of noise received by the array when the array is being used to receive a desired signal.
Background Of The Invention Beamforming is a term used to designate the operations associated with forming spatial sensitivity pattern for an array of sensors. Classical beamforming is defined as "delay and sum beamforming". In delay and sum beamforming, a source transmits a wave that propagates and arrives at an array of sensors at different times, depending on the source direction and the array geometry. The outputs of the sensors of the array are delayed, to compensate for the delay in time of arrival of the source's wave, which originated from the preferred direction, and summed, to provide a classical directional beamformer output. The effect of sources that are located at directions other than the preferred direction (referred to as the looking direction) is reduced by the beamforming process, resulting in maximum sensitivity of the process towards the preferred direction.
Cross-reference to Related Applications This application is related to application U.S. Serial No.: , by Andrea et al., filed on October 22, 1999 and entitled System and Method for Adaptive Interference Canceling (Attorney Docket No.
7010), hereby incorporated by reference.
Field of the Invention This invention relates to signal processing, and more particularly, to processing the signals received by an array of sensors in order to minimize the amount of noise received by the array when the array is being used to receive a desired signal.
Background Of The Invention Beamforming is a term used to designate the operations associated with forming spatial sensitivity pattern for an array of sensors. Classical beamforming is defined as "delay and sum beamforming". In delay and sum beamforming, a source transmits a wave that propagates and arrives at an array of sensors at different times, depending on the source direction and the array geometry. The outputs of the sensors of the array are delayed, to compensate for the delay in time of arrival of the source's wave, which originated from the preferred direction, and summed, to provide a classical directional beamformer output. The effect of sources that are located at directions other than the preferred direction (referred to as the looking direction) is reduced by the beamforming process, resulting in maximum sensitivity of the process towards the preferred direction.
The array of sensors can be, for example, an array of microphones receiving an acoustic sound source. The beamforming process can be used to map sound sources (in a sonar system for example), or to emphasize a sound source whose direction is known, by modifying the compensating delays and "steering" the look direction of the array. The beam-width - usually defined as the difference between the two angles, in which the output energy is reduced by 3dB relative to the beam center-depends on the array length, frequency of the received signal and propagation speed of the received signal (in our example the speed of sound). For many practical purposes the beam-width of the array will not be sufficiently narrow, and enlarging the array length is not desired. For those cases a more directional beamforming process is required.
Moreover, while delay and sum beamforming, does not provide optimum noise reduction. If the sensors' outputs are filtered (a different filter to each sensor) and the outputs of the filters summed, one can obtain a different shape of the beamformer output and improve noise reduction. With a careful design it is possible, for example, to create a null (zero reception) towards a given direction. If a noise source's direction is known and a null is placed in that direction, improved noise reduction can be realized as compared to the noise reduction of the classic delay and sum beamformer.
Two basic approaches have been developed to obtain optimum performance of a beamformer in the presence of noise. The first one, presented in Monzingo and Miller - Introduction to Adaptive Arrays (Wiley, New York) pp. 89-and 155-216 shows that if a filter is created for each sensor that for each frequency will have gain weights of w -_ C w (1) °p' vC-'v the output of the beamformer will have optimum performance in terms of noise reduction. The above weights will maintain a unity gain at the look direction (no distortion of the desired signal) while providing minimum energy at the output. The two assumptions (minimum energy and no signal degradation) will result minimum noise at the output. In Eq. (1) C is the noise covariance matrix and it may be expressed as:
C = E {y*yT} (2) where yT=~Y~(~ Y2(~ ~~ Yn(~~
is the noise measurement at the elements, and v is the steering vector towards the look direction, expressed as:
e-~W.o v = e-j""' (4) where e-lwya-1) i0-T(n-1) are the steering delays introduced to elements 0-n respectively by a target originated at the look direction. Further, the filtered elements approach was extended by Frost (O. L. Frost, III, "An Algorithm for Linearly Constrained Adaptive Array Processing," Proc. IEEE, vol. 60, no. 8, pp. 926-935, Aug. 1972.) to provide an adaptive beamformer in which the weights would adapt themselves so that they converge to provide the optimum solution.
The second basic approach to obtain optimum beamformer performance S was developed by Griffiths (L. J. Griffiths and C. W. Jim, "An Alternative Approach to Linearly Constrained Adaptive Beamforming," IEEE Trans. Antennas Propagat., vol. AP-30, no. 1, pp. 27-34, Jan. 1982.) who suggested using a Noise Canceling (NC) approach to the optimum beamformer problem. In his approach the adaptive coefficient are updated by the Least Mean Squares (LMS) algorithm. Griffiths proposed using the elements' signals to obtain a main channel, in which both the signal and the noise are present, and reference channels, in which only noise is present (i.e. which are signal free). The main channel can be generated through one of the elements alone, or through classic delay and sum beamforming. The reference channels can be generated through the subtraction of one element from another, or by forming any other linear combination of elements that would provide a zero output at the look direction (i.e. the signal direction). The main channel and the reference channels are utilized by an adaptive LMS Widrow filter to obtain an optimum beamformer (see Adaptive Noise Canceling:
Principals and Applications - Widrow, Glover, McCool - Proc. IEEE vo163 no.l2 1692-1716, Dec 1975). In this adaptive beamformer each reference channel is filtered (i.e. each channel signal is convolved with a set of filter coefficients), the filtered channels are summed together to obtain the noise estimation, and the noise estimation is subtracted from the main channel to provide a noise free signal. The filter coefficients in the Griffiths solution converge to woP~=C 1p (5) where C is the noise covariance matrix and p is the correlation vector between the beam output and the reference channels. Note that with this approach the steering is done through the creation of the reference channels and the beam, so there is no steering vector towards the look direction in equation (S). Griffiths showed that, for an n elements system, if one creates n-1 reference channels, the LMS approach would -comverge-to the-same optimum solution as Frost: --Objects and Summary of the Invention It has been recognized that while the two approaches to optimum beamforming discussed above were primarily developed to provide an adaptive solution, they also teach us what the optimum solution would be given the noise covariance matrix. A non-adaptive approach, in which predetermined filters are designed and used, is sometimes more appealing than an adaptive approach. The fixed beam (non-adaptive) approach is much less computationally intensive, it is much less sensitive to leakage of the desired signal to the reference channels and it does not give rise to distortion in the desired signal. Also, the fixed approach has the potential to handle some types of noises better than an adaptive process, such as reverberation and diffused low noises. On the other hand, one may not want to give up the adaptive process, because it provides the best immunity to significant directional noises. A
hybrid system that uses both adaptive and non-adaptive techniques provides a system which realizes the advantages of both techniques.
Further, it has been recognized that while the above described optimum beamforming techniques provide the solution given the noise covariance matrix, they do not show how to determine this matrix for a particular noise scenario. Also, the equations show how the required weights for each frequency can be computed, but they do not show how to implement the time domain filters that will approximate the weighting solution. The prior work in this area does not discuss how such time domain filters would be designed or implemented in a combined adaptive/non-adaptive beamforming system. Moreover, there is no teaching as to techniques for overcoming differences in the elements' sensitivity, phase, or the influence of packaging and other mechanical interferences on the performance of the fixed beam.
In view of the above considerations, it is an object of the invention to provide a sensor array beamforming system capable of optimal noise reduction performance.
It is another obj ect of the invention to provide a simple and easy method to design optimal filters in a sensor array beamforming system.
It is still another object the invention to provide a simple and easy way to implement the optimal system in as a fixed solution system or as a combined fixed and adaptive system.
It is yet another object of the invention to provide a method to design optimum filters for a sensor array beamforming system that would take into consideration the specific characteristics of the sensors (microphones for example), and other mechanical or acoustical features that influence the performance of the array.
In order to realize the above objects of the invention and overcome the drawbacks of prior systems, the invention provides a sensor array receiving system which incorporates one or more filters that are capable of adaptive and/or fixed operation. The filters are defined by a multiple of coefficients and the coefficients are set so as to maximize the signal to noise ratio of the receiving array's output. In one preferred embodiment, the filter coefficients are adaptively determined and are faded into a predetermined group of fixed values upon the occurrence of a specified event.
Thereby, allowing the sensor array to operate in both the adaptive and fixed modes, and providing the array with the ability to employ the mode most favorable for a given aperating environment. In another preferred embodiment; the filter coefficients are set to a fixed group of values which are determined to be optimal for a predefined noise environment.
Thus, reference is made to application U.S. Serial No.: , by Andrea et al., filed on October 22, 1999 and entitled System and Method for Adaptive Interference Canceling (Attorney Docket No. 670025-7010), which, together with the documents and patents and patent applications cited therein are hereby incorporated by reference; the present invention may be used in conjunction 1 S with embodiments disclosed or discussed in Andrea et al. and/or in the documents, patents and patent applications cited in Andrea et al. (and incorporated herein), e.g., the "Superbeam" technology of this invention can be used in conjunction with "DSDA"
technology in embodiments disclosed or discussed in Andrea et al. and/or in the documents, patents and patent applications cited in Andrea et al. (and incorporated herein).
Brief Description of the Drawings The following detailed description, given by way of example and not intended to limit the present invention solely thereto, will best be appreciated in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, wherein like reference numerals denote like elements and parts, in which:
Fig. 1 is block diagram of a filtered input type beamforming system in accordance with the present invention.
Fig. 2 is a block diagram of a filtered references type beamforming system in accordance the present invention.
Fig. 2A is a flowchart which shows an illustrative procedure for designing and implementing the fixed filtered references approach.
Fig. 3 is a flowchart showing an illustrative procedure for generating fixed filter coefficients through the use of simulated noise and an actual adaptive system positioned in an an-echoic chamber.
Fig. 4 is a flowchart showing an illustrative procedure for generating fixed filter coefficients through the use of simulated noise, a microphone array positioned in an an-echoic chamber and an actual adaptive system positioned outside an an-echoic chamber.
Fig. 5 is a flowchart showing an illustrative procedure for generating simulated noise and using the simulated noise to generate fixed beamformer coefficients.
Detailed Description The following description will be divided into four parts. Part one will detail a method for designing and implementing fixed beam optimal filters based on the filtered input approach. Part two will detail a method for designing and implementing fixed beam optimal filters based on the filtered references approach. Part three will detail a hybrid system that includes both a fixed solution and an adaptive one. Part four will detail two alternative approaches to the design and implementation of fixed beam filters.
1 - A method of desi ing and implementing fixed beam optimal filters based on the filtered input approach.
Fig. 1 is block diagram of a filtered input type beamforming system in accordance with the present invention. As can be seen from the Fig. 1, N
microphones 10~_N are conditioned and sampled by signal conditioners 12;_N. The microphones' samples are respectively stored in time tapped delay lines 141_N and filtered by filters 16,_N via convolvers 18;_N. The output of the filters is summed up via an adder 20 to provide a fixed beamformer solution. In the Fig. 1 embodiment, the invention provides -a method for creating the noise covariance matrix and then using equation (1) to actually design the coefficients for filters 161-N. It should be noted that the equation provides us with the required coefficients in the frequency domain. The time domain coefficients are obtained from the frequency domain coefficients.
To determine the optimal solution for any given scenario we first define the scenario in terms of the spatial distribution of the interfering sources (directions and relative intensity). For each of the interfering sources we assume a far field model. Let us consider an array of M identical omni-directional sensors with a known arbitrary geometry measuring the wave-field generated by a single far-field source. Let r; denote the location of the i-th sensor, where r; =[x;, y;, z;] and let ~ and B denote the azimuth and elevation angles of the radiating source, respectively.
Let us now define a differential delay vector, which expresses the delay in time of arrival of the interference wave front to the various elements:
T
~ -[~12~~13~ ... e~l,M, ~ ~Ij - ~j ~1' where the first sensor serves as a reference and the delays are measured relative to it.
S The signal "Direction Of Arrival" vector for the far field case is given by:
kX sin(6)cos(~) k = ky = sin(B)sin(~) . (6) k1 cos(B) Let us define a distance matrix R between the sensors of the array 10 __ r2 - r1 R = : (7) rM - r1 The time delay between any two sensors is equal to the projection of the distance vector between them along the k vector divided by the wave propagation velocity (sound velocity for example). Consequently, the delay vector can be expressed as follows:
i=-c where c is the wave velocity and the matrix R is composed of the distance vectors between all the sensors and the reference sensor. More explicitly, for sensor j we can write z,~ _ [x,~ cos(B) sin() + y,~ sin(B) sin() + z,~ cos(~)] / c (9) Assuming that interference i has an amplitude of s; and a Direction Of Arrival vector of k; then its measurement by the array can be expressed as the source steering vector multiplied by the source amplitude -~~T _~2~/c Y~ ~.f ) = S~b~ ~.f ) = See = see (lo) The contribution of source i to the noise covariance matrix is expresses as:
C; = E{YrYrt } (11) Since b; is deterministic and we assume stationary sources where s 2 is the power of the source i the above equation is reduced to (11 a) C; = Y~Ya Under the assumption that the interferences are uncorrelated we can write C = ~ C; ( 12) If we assume that there is an additive uncorrelated noise (spatially distributed white noise) n to each of the sensors we obtain C=nI+~C; (13) where I is the unity matrix with a size of [M x M].
So far we obtained the noise covariance matrix for a predetermined noise environment. In order to use equation (1) we need to calculate the steering vector v.
This steering vector expresses the look of the array towards a defined direction. The steering vector v is the conjugate of the vector already expressed in equation (4) and it is calculated in the same way as the steering vector of the noise sources (see (8) and (9)) where ~ and B are the azimuth and elevation of the look direction, respectively.
It should be noted that a far field model for the noises was used to obtain the above equations. It is not necessarily desirable to use a far field model for the target (desired signal). For example, one may want to implement a focusing effect on the target in near field situations. Such an effect can be obtained by manipulating the steering vector accordingly.
The fixed solution technique of Fig. 1, using equation (1), provides a way to calculate the gain weights of each sensor in an array for each frequency. More specifically, for each frequency of interest the system of Fig. 1, equation (1) is solved to yield one weight for each filter (wopt is a vector with the number of elements being equal to the number of sensors). Thus, if it is desired to obtain the optimum weights for ten frequencies, for example, equation (1) is solved for ten frequencies and each filter 161_N is then defined by ten frequency domain weights - the set of frequency domain weights for each filter defining the filter's frequency domain response.
Once the frequency response for each filter is determined, it is necessary to design the time domain filters to provide the determined frequency response. If the weights (or "gains") are real numbers - meaning that the desired filter has a linear phase - we can use the weights with any of the well-known methods to design the filter for each sensor. For example, a Remez Exchange Method can be used. For simple cases such as when the array is linear and the noise sources are positioned in a symmetric structure around the look direction, the gain weights would be real numbers.
If the gain weights are complex numbers, such as when the noise structure is not symmetric, the required filter will not have a linear phase. For these cases one can feed the weights for each filter to an IFFT (Inverse Fast Fourier Transform) procedure to obtain the time domain function that would provide the desired frequency response and phases for the filter.
2 - A method for designing and implementing fixed beam optimal filters based on the filtered references approach.
Fig. 2 is a block diagram of a filtered references type beamforming system in accordance the present invention. As can be seen from Fig. 2, N
microphones 261_N are conditioned and sampled by signal conditioners 281_N. The microphone outputs are processed by a delay and sum beamformer 30 to provide a beam channel, and by a reference channel processor 32 which is typical of an LMS beamforming system.
As shown, the beam channel may be formed via the classic delay and sum beamforming process on the inputs, however the alternatives include any linear combination of sensor outputs that will provide a maximum towards the looking (listening) direction.
The reference channels are processed such that a null is placed towards the looking direction. It may be obtained by subtracting one microphone form the other, or by forming some other linear combination of sensor outputs. The output of the reference channels is respectively stored in tapped delay lines 341_ (L may or may not be equal to I~ and filtered by filters 361_L via convolvers 381_N The filtered reference channel output is summed via an adder 40 and subtracted via a subtractor 42 from the beamformer output as delayed by a delay line 44. This structure is typical to adaptive beamformers, where the reference channels are filtered by adaptive filters and then summed and subtracted from the delayed main beam signal. In our case, the filters are fixed (non adaptive) and pre-designed. The method is highly practical in systems that already have the structure of an adaptive beamformer, which can be applied to both the adaptive solution and the fixed solution.
In the filtered references embodiment of Fig. 2, the filters' coefficients are designed and determined using equation (5). More particularly, the noise covariance matrix is determined and then used in equation (5) to determine the filter coefficients.
As was the case in the filtered input embodiment of Fig. 1, equation (5) provides filter coefficients in the frequency domain and it is necessary to obtain the time domain coefficients from the frequency domain coefficients.
Equation (5) is expressed as wop~ = C-'p where C is the noise covariance matrix as measured by the reference channels, and p is the correlation vector between the main channel (beam) output and the reference channels.
5 We obtain the noise covariance matrix using techniques that are similar to those used in the filtered inputs approach. The difference is that we need to obtain the noise received as it appears in the reference channels, and not as it appears at each sensor.
To do this, we first obtain the contribution of each noise source to each sensor (the same y; that we obtained in the previous method), and then find the contribution of each noise source to 10 each reference channels. The reference channels are generally relatively flat sensitivity patterns having nulls pointing to the array look direction. The reference channels are created using linear combinations of the elements' outputs after they have been steered to the look direction. For example xl+xz-(x3+x4) may be a reference channel after the inputs (denoted as x~) have been appropriately delayed to compensate for the look 15 direction. These relations can be expressed as a nulling matrix N (note again that in order to guarantee a signal free reference the sum of the elements of each row in the matrix should be 0).
Example for nulling matrix for an array of four microphones and three reference channels is N= 4 -3 1 1 1 (14) Note also that for an n elements array only n-1 independent nulls can be created. If we denote v as the steering vector to the look direction than we can obtain the contribution of the a noise source i to the reference channels through the following equation:
x; = N ~ diag(v) ~ y; (15) where diag(v) is the diagonal matrix which elements are the element of the vector v (for broad side array diag(v)=I - the unity matrix), y; is the interference contribution of noise source i measured by the array elements as described above, N is the a Nulling matrix used to create the reference channels and x; is the contribution of interference of noise source i as measured by the reference channels. Through equation (15) the contribution of a noise source is "transferred" from the array elements to the reference channels.
The overall noise measured the reference channels is the sum of the noise contributed by each interference.
x=~x; (16) where x is the noise measured at the reference channels.
The contribution of each x; to the noise covariance matrix is expressed as C; = E{x;x; } (17) As in the case of equation (11), since x is a multiplication of a stationery signal by a deterministic one (the steering elements) the equation is reduced to C; = x;x; (17a) Under the assumption that the interferences are uncorrelated we can write C=~C; (18) If we assume that there is an additive uncorrelated noise n (spatially distributed white noise) to each of the sensors we obtain C = nI + ~ C; ( 19) where I is the unity matrix with a size of [M x M].
We now need to find the correlation vector p. This vector expresses the correlation between the beam signal and the reference channels. The correlation vector p is given by:
P = ~ P a (20) where p; is given by p; = beam;x; (21) and beam; = v'y; (22) After obtaining both C and p equation (5) is used to find the gain weights for each frequency. The practicality of obtaining the weight for a series of discrete frequencies and the actual design of the filters was demonstrated above in relation to the filtered inputs method of Fig. 1.
An illustrative procedure for designing and implementing the fixed filtered references approach is shown in Fig. 2A. As can be seen from the figure, the first steps are to define the desired noise scenario, the array configuration and frequency range and resolution (step 50), and to initialize certain variables to be used in the procedure(step52). Next, the contribution of a first noise source to the noise covariance matrix - at the array output - is computed (step 54). The noise source's contribution to reference channel noise covariance matrix is then computed on the basis of the source's contribution at the array output, the nulling matrix and the steering vector toward the array look direction (step 56) is computed, and the correlation vector between the beam signal and the reference channels for the source is determined (step 58).
At this point a determination is made as to whether each source has been considered in steps 52-58 (step 60). If not all noise sources have been considered, a count variable is incremented (step 62) and steps 52-58 are performed for the next noise source. If all noise sources have been considered, the contributions of each noise source to each reference channel are summed to generate a reference channel covariance matrix and the beam/reference channels correlation vectors are added to determine a beam/reference channel correlation matrix (step 64). Once the reference channel noise covariance matrix and correlation matrix are determined for a particular frequency under consideration, a filter coefficient corresponding to that frequency is determined for each channel according to equation (5) (step 66).
A determination is then made if each desired frequency has been considered (step 68) If not all frequencies have been considered, a count variable is incremented (step 70) and steps 52-68 are performed for the next frequency. If all frequencies have been considered, a filter design program is used to obtain the filter time domain coefficients that approximate the desired response as defined by the frequency domain coefficients determined in step 66 (step 72).
3- A hybrid system that includes both a fixed solution and an adaptive one.
Adaptive systems are designed to provide the optimum solution to the noise environment at any time. Using the reference channel type approach, an adaptive system measures and studies the noise sources through the reference channels and subtracts it utilizing LMS filters. A major problem of an adaptive system is the leakage problem. The desired signal "leaks" into the reference channel nulls due to differences in the sensors' sensitivity and phases, or due to mechanical imperfections.
The leakage of the desired signal into the nulls causes the system to try and cancel the desired signal as though it was noise, and thereby causes distortion in reception of the desired signal.
One way to prevent signal distortion due to leakage is by blocking (or freezing) the adaptive process when a strong desired signal is detected, and thus prevent the adaptive process from attempting to cancel the desired signal. However, regardless of the logic of the adaptive process blockage, blocking has the effect of locking the noise reduction filters on the solution existing immediately before blockage commenced, resulting in the filters losing their relevancy in time.
In order to overcome the ameliorate the problems associated with leakage and blocking, the present invention provides a system in which the filters' 5 coefficients drift form their adaptive solution into a pre-designed fixed solution. The system initializes its filters' coefficients with the fixed pre-designed solution and fades into the fixed solution whenever the adaptive process is blocked. The drifting mechanism is implemented in the following way: let w;(n) be the i-th coefficient of an adaptive filter at time n, and let w(0) be the fixed value of that filter coefficient, then 10 w;(n+1)=w;(n)*y+w;(0)*(1-y) (23) where y determines how fast the filter will converge into its fixed solution.
The drifting process of the invention serves another purpose. It has been 1 S shown that the adaptive process may explode (or diverge) due to numerical problems when the process is performed by a fixed-point processor (see Limited Precision Effects in Adaptive Filtering - John M. Cioffi - IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems vol cas-34 no. 7, Jul 1987). To prevent such a divergent breakdown, it is sometimes useful to apply a "leaky filter". A leaky filter multiplies its coefficients by a 20 number smaller than one before they get updated, thus preventing divergence due to numerical problems. Although the leaky process does not allow the filter to converge to the optimum solution, it prevents mathematical divergence.
The use of the decaying process proposed here will eliminate the need to use a strong leaky process (or any leaky process) since whenever the adaptive process is blocked the whole adaptive process is actually reset. Also it is possible to be more generous in the blocking logic - meaning it is possible to allow it to happen more often, since the filter will fade into a sub optimal, but fairly good, solution and the pitfalls normally associated with blocking are avoided.
4- Alternative approaches to design and implement fixed beam filters In parts one and two of this description fixed beamformer implementations of the invention were presented. In these two implementations one simulates a noise structure by placing noise sources in the sphere, then the noise covariance matrix is calculated and the optimum filter for that noise structure is obtained. In part three of the description a hybrid beamformer implementation was discussed. In the third implementation, an adaptive process is employed when there are significant noises to adapt to, and the fixed solution kicks in when the adaptive process in inhibited for some reason (e.g. a strong signal).
It is proposed here that, assuming one has the infrastructure for an adaptive solution, it can be utilized to obtain the fixed solution using the adaptive process. For example, lets assume that the adaptive process is implemented on an off line system using high-level language (like Matlab for example). One can simulate the noise structure off line, i.e. obtain the noise signal on each of the microphones (time domain noise sources multiplied by the source steering vector). This noise data can then be fed into the simulated off line adaptive process. Once the adaptive process converges, one can read the final values of the filters' coefficients and use them as the optimum solution for the pre-defined noise situation. The disadvantage of using the adaptive process in a simulated environment to obtain the fixed weights is that it is time consuming. Large data files need to be prepared for the filters to converge and the adaptive process is a very computation intensive when it is done off line.
Also, the existence of an adaptive system simulation has been assumed, and if one does not exist it needs to be prepared:-The advantage-of this method is that it would provide a more accurate solution than the direct methods. The reason is that the direct methods determine the gain weight in the frequency domain. It is then necessary to go through a filter design process that is, by nature, an approximation and includes inherent compromises, over which we have no control. Even more so, in the methods discussed in parts one and two each filter is designed separately and we have no guaranty that the overall beamformer performance (using all the filters concurrently) could not provide a better solution.
Running the simulated data through the adaptive process assure us that we get the optimum solution for the simulated scenario, that is for the simulated noise environment and array structure. For example, if we use the reference channel type adaptive filter, the solution will take into account the specific way we actually implemented the reference channels - which the separate filter design discussed in part two does not take into account.
Another approach proposed in this invention assumes that there is a real time working adaptive system. The simulated noise data can be stored on a recording media, such as a mufti-channel digital tape recorder, or a computer equipped with a mufti-channel sound card. The noise data can be injected into the real time working system which will converge to the solution, freeze the final filters' coefficients and either store them permanently as the fixed solution or transmit them to a hosting system to be burned into the fixed beamformer solution. The advantage of this method is that once the noise data is prepared, the solution is obtained very fast. The adaptive filter will converge within seconds. Another advantage of this method is that the fixed solution will take into account all kinds of implementation related issues like - fixed point and numerical inaccuracies, final dynamic range of the system, differences in the input ports of the processor like different A/D converters and so on.
Taking the above approach one step further, the present invention proposes to create a simulated noise environment using loudspeakers in an an-echoic chamber, then-running the adaptive system in the chamber and freezing the final values of coefficients as the fixed array solution. Loudspeakers are placed in an an-echoic chamber to simulate a certain noise scenario - for example two loudspeakers can be placed on each side of the array at 40 degrees and 75 degrees azimuth angle. A
simulated noise is played through the loudspeakers - for example pink wide band noise.
The adaptive system runs and converges (within seconds) and the final filters' coefficients are stored. The process can be automated - the adaptive system is put in a calibration mode, the adaptive system converges and than stores coefficients converged to as in its own memory as the fixed solution. The calibrated system is than switched off from the calibration mode for normal operation.
The advantage of using the actual working adaptive system is that the convergence solution takes into account not just the process itself with all its peculiarities like dynamic range of the processor and the exact implementation of the filters, but also unknown factors like the microphones sensitivities and phases, mechanical interferences and so on. This is particularly important since it has been observed that the fixed solution is very sensitive to some parameters like mismatch in S phases. Also, if the sensors are microphones, for example, and cardioids (uni directional) microphones are used instead of omni directional microphones, then the mismatch in phase may be such that the actual performance of the filters may be far from what was pre-designed. The packaging of the microphone (or other sensor) array may also affect the performance strongly. Using the real working adaptive system to adaptively generate the fixed solution coefficients takes all these parameters into account and ensures an optimum solution the given system.
The disadvantage of the method is that, in general, it is necessary to use many simulated noise sources in order to achieve desirable performance improvement.
Use of one noise source located at one side of an array, for example, may cause the array to adapt such that the noise source is effectively cancelled while the beam shape on the array side opposite is undesirable. However, for a relatively small array, where the fixed super directionality is most needed, few noise sources will usually be sufficient to provide an improved performance. For instance, in a four cardioids microphone array with an aperture of 6" four noise sources are sufficient to provide a noise rejection of 20 dB at angles over 30 degrees from the look direction.
An illustrative procedure for generating fixed filter coefficients through the use of simulated noise and an actual adaptive system positioned in an an-echoic chamber is shown Fig. 3. The first step is to create four random noise files having a white or pink spectrum and a duration of 30 seconds or more (step 74). Next, four speakers and an adaptive beamforming system are place in an an-echoic chamber, with the angles between the speakers and array look direction being set at -70°, -40°, 40° and 70° (step 76). The four noise files are fed to the loudspeakers (step 78) and the adaptive 5 system is allowed to converge to the optimal solution and the filter coefficients corresponding to the optimal solution are stored (step 80).
Another technique to calibrate a system is proposed here. The microphone array is placed in the an-echoic chamber and the simulated noise is played through the loudspeakers. The output of the array is recorded (no real time DSP system 10 is present in the chamber). The recorded output is then replayed into the real time system. The adaptive process converges and the final filters' coefficients are stored and burned into the system as the fixed array solution. This method is sometimes more practical when the automatic calibration and burning mechanism is not implemented. It is highly inconvenient to perform the down loading and uploading of the coefficient 1 S from a system that is positioned in the chamber. This operation usually requires a development system (like In Circuit Emulator or a simulator). It is much more convenient to do the recording in the chamber and perform the down loading and uploading of coefficients outside were the development system is located.
An illustrative procedure for generating fixed filter coefficients through 20 the use of simulated noise, a microphone array positioned in an an-echoic chamber and an actual adaptive system positioned outside an an-echoic chamber is shown in Fig. 4.
As in the procedure of Fig. 3, the first step in the Fig. 4 procedure is to create four random noise files having a white or pink spectrum and a duration of 30 (step 82). The WO 01/37435 PCT/~JS00/41537 next is to place four speakers and an a microphone array in an an-echoic chamber, with the angles between the speakers and array look direction being set at -70°, -40°, 40° and_ 70° (step 84). The four noise files are fed to the loudspeakers (step 86) and the microphone array's output is recorded on a mufti-channel recorder (step 88).
The recorded output is then played into an adaptive beamformer system which is located outside the an-echoic chamber and the beamformer is allowed to converge to the optimal solution, the coefficients corresponding to the optimal solution being stored for use as the fixed filter coefficients (step 90).
Fig. 5 shows an illustrative procedure for generating simulated noise and using the simulated noise to generate fixed beamformer coefficients. The first step in the procedure is to define the desired noise field scenario and the array configuration (step 90). Next, a counting variable indicative of the noise source being considered is initialized to one (step 94). A random signal is generated to represent the noise emanating from the source under consideration (step 96), and for each sensor, the contribution of noise from the source under consideration is calculated.
Calculation of noise source contributions involves; initializing to one a counting variable indicative of the sensor under consideration (step 98); determining the time delay from the source to the sensor under consideration, relative to the time delay to other sensors (step 100);
and determining the noise source contribution based on the random signal generated in step 96 and the time delay (step 102).
After the noise contribution of a source to a particular sensor is calculated, a determination is made as to whether all sensors have been considered (step 104). If all sensors have not been considered, the sensor counting variable is incremented (step 106) and the procedure returns to step 98. When all sensors have been considered for a particular source, a determination is made as to whether all _ sources have been considered (step 108), and if not, the source counting variable is incremented (step 110) and the procedure returns to step 96. Once the contribution of each noise source to each sensor has been calculated the generation of the simulated noise data is complete. The noise data is then fed to an adaptive procedure which is allowed to converge, and the coefficients derived from the converged operation are stored for use as the optimal fixed coefficients (step 112).
While the present invention has been particularly shown and described in conjunction with preferred embodiments thereof, it will be readily appreciated by those of ordinary skill in the art that various changes may be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention. Therefore, it is intended that the appended claims be interpreted as including the embodiments described herein as well as all equivalents thereto.
Moreover, while delay and sum beamforming, does not provide optimum noise reduction. If the sensors' outputs are filtered (a different filter to each sensor) and the outputs of the filters summed, one can obtain a different shape of the beamformer output and improve noise reduction. With a careful design it is possible, for example, to create a null (zero reception) towards a given direction. If a noise source's direction is known and a null is placed in that direction, improved noise reduction can be realized as compared to the noise reduction of the classic delay and sum beamformer.
Two basic approaches have been developed to obtain optimum performance of a beamformer in the presence of noise. The first one, presented in Monzingo and Miller - Introduction to Adaptive Arrays (Wiley, New York) pp. 89-and 155-216 shows that if a filter is created for each sensor that for each frequency will have gain weights of w -_ C w (1) °p' vC-'v the output of the beamformer will have optimum performance in terms of noise reduction. The above weights will maintain a unity gain at the look direction (no distortion of the desired signal) while providing minimum energy at the output. The two assumptions (minimum energy and no signal degradation) will result minimum noise at the output. In Eq. (1) C is the noise covariance matrix and it may be expressed as:
C = E {y*yT} (2) where yT=~Y~(~ Y2(~ ~~ Yn(~~
is the noise measurement at the elements, and v is the steering vector towards the look direction, expressed as:
e-~W.o v = e-j""' (4) where e-lwya-1) i0-T(n-1) are the steering delays introduced to elements 0-n respectively by a target originated at the look direction. Further, the filtered elements approach was extended by Frost (O. L. Frost, III, "An Algorithm for Linearly Constrained Adaptive Array Processing," Proc. IEEE, vol. 60, no. 8, pp. 926-935, Aug. 1972.) to provide an adaptive beamformer in which the weights would adapt themselves so that they converge to provide the optimum solution.
The second basic approach to obtain optimum beamformer performance S was developed by Griffiths (L. J. Griffiths and C. W. Jim, "An Alternative Approach to Linearly Constrained Adaptive Beamforming," IEEE Trans. Antennas Propagat., vol. AP-30, no. 1, pp. 27-34, Jan. 1982.) who suggested using a Noise Canceling (NC) approach to the optimum beamformer problem. In his approach the adaptive coefficient are updated by the Least Mean Squares (LMS) algorithm. Griffiths proposed using the elements' signals to obtain a main channel, in which both the signal and the noise are present, and reference channels, in which only noise is present (i.e. which are signal free). The main channel can be generated through one of the elements alone, or through classic delay and sum beamforming. The reference channels can be generated through the subtraction of one element from another, or by forming any other linear combination of elements that would provide a zero output at the look direction (i.e. the signal direction). The main channel and the reference channels are utilized by an adaptive LMS Widrow filter to obtain an optimum beamformer (see Adaptive Noise Canceling:
Principals and Applications - Widrow, Glover, McCool - Proc. IEEE vo163 no.l2 1692-1716, Dec 1975). In this adaptive beamformer each reference channel is filtered (i.e. each channel signal is convolved with a set of filter coefficients), the filtered channels are summed together to obtain the noise estimation, and the noise estimation is subtracted from the main channel to provide a noise free signal. The filter coefficients in the Griffiths solution converge to woP~=C 1p (5) where C is the noise covariance matrix and p is the correlation vector between the beam output and the reference channels. Note that with this approach the steering is done through the creation of the reference channels and the beam, so there is no steering vector towards the look direction in equation (S). Griffiths showed that, for an n elements system, if one creates n-1 reference channels, the LMS approach would -comverge-to the-same optimum solution as Frost: --Objects and Summary of the Invention It has been recognized that while the two approaches to optimum beamforming discussed above were primarily developed to provide an adaptive solution, they also teach us what the optimum solution would be given the noise covariance matrix. A non-adaptive approach, in which predetermined filters are designed and used, is sometimes more appealing than an adaptive approach. The fixed beam (non-adaptive) approach is much less computationally intensive, it is much less sensitive to leakage of the desired signal to the reference channels and it does not give rise to distortion in the desired signal. Also, the fixed approach has the potential to handle some types of noises better than an adaptive process, such as reverberation and diffused low noises. On the other hand, one may not want to give up the adaptive process, because it provides the best immunity to significant directional noises. A
hybrid system that uses both adaptive and non-adaptive techniques provides a system which realizes the advantages of both techniques.
Further, it has been recognized that while the above described optimum beamforming techniques provide the solution given the noise covariance matrix, they do not show how to determine this matrix for a particular noise scenario. Also, the equations show how the required weights for each frequency can be computed, but they do not show how to implement the time domain filters that will approximate the weighting solution. The prior work in this area does not discuss how such time domain filters would be designed or implemented in a combined adaptive/non-adaptive beamforming system. Moreover, there is no teaching as to techniques for overcoming differences in the elements' sensitivity, phase, or the influence of packaging and other mechanical interferences on the performance of the fixed beam.
In view of the above considerations, it is an object of the invention to provide a sensor array beamforming system capable of optimal noise reduction performance.
It is another obj ect of the invention to provide a simple and easy method to design optimal filters in a sensor array beamforming system.
It is still another object the invention to provide a simple and easy way to implement the optimal system in as a fixed solution system or as a combined fixed and adaptive system.
It is yet another object of the invention to provide a method to design optimum filters for a sensor array beamforming system that would take into consideration the specific characteristics of the sensors (microphones for example), and other mechanical or acoustical features that influence the performance of the array.
In order to realize the above objects of the invention and overcome the drawbacks of prior systems, the invention provides a sensor array receiving system which incorporates one or more filters that are capable of adaptive and/or fixed operation. The filters are defined by a multiple of coefficients and the coefficients are set so as to maximize the signal to noise ratio of the receiving array's output. In one preferred embodiment, the filter coefficients are adaptively determined and are faded into a predetermined group of fixed values upon the occurrence of a specified event.
Thereby, allowing the sensor array to operate in both the adaptive and fixed modes, and providing the array with the ability to employ the mode most favorable for a given aperating environment. In another preferred embodiment; the filter coefficients are set to a fixed group of values which are determined to be optimal for a predefined noise environment.
Thus, reference is made to application U.S. Serial No.: , by Andrea et al., filed on October 22, 1999 and entitled System and Method for Adaptive Interference Canceling (Attorney Docket No. 670025-7010), which, together with the documents and patents and patent applications cited therein are hereby incorporated by reference; the present invention may be used in conjunction 1 S with embodiments disclosed or discussed in Andrea et al. and/or in the documents, patents and patent applications cited in Andrea et al. (and incorporated herein), e.g., the "Superbeam" technology of this invention can be used in conjunction with "DSDA"
technology in embodiments disclosed or discussed in Andrea et al. and/or in the documents, patents and patent applications cited in Andrea et al. (and incorporated herein).
Brief Description of the Drawings The following detailed description, given by way of example and not intended to limit the present invention solely thereto, will best be appreciated in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, wherein like reference numerals denote like elements and parts, in which:
Fig. 1 is block diagram of a filtered input type beamforming system in accordance with the present invention.
Fig. 2 is a block diagram of a filtered references type beamforming system in accordance the present invention.
Fig. 2A is a flowchart which shows an illustrative procedure for designing and implementing the fixed filtered references approach.
Fig. 3 is a flowchart showing an illustrative procedure for generating fixed filter coefficients through the use of simulated noise and an actual adaptive system positioned in an an-echoic chamber.
Fig. 4 is a flowchart showing an illustrative procedure for generating fixed filter coefficients through the use of simulated noise, a microphone array positioned in an an-echoic chamber and an actual adaptive system positioned outside an an-echoic chamber.
Fig. 5 is a flowchart showing an illustrative procedure for generating simulated noise and using the simulated noise to generate fixed beamformer coefficients.
Detailed Description The following description will be divided into four parts. Part one will detail a method for designing and implementing fixed beam optimal filters based on the filtered input approach. Part two will detail a method for designing and implementing fixed beam optimal filters based on the filtered references approach. Part three will detail a hybrid system that includes both a fixed solution and an adaptive one. Part four will detail two alternative approaches to the design and implementation of fixed beam filters.
1 - A method of desi ing and implementing fixed beam optimal filters based on the filtered input approach.
Fig. 1 is block diagram of a filtered input type beamforming system in accordance with the present invention. As can be seen from the Fig. 1, N
microphones 10~_N are conditioned and sampled by signal conditioners 12;_N. The microphones' samples are respectively stored in time tapped delay lines 141_N and filtered by filters 16,_N via convolvers 18;_N. The output of the filters is summed up via an adder 20 to provide a fixed beamformer solution. In the Fig. 1 embodiment, the invention provides -a method for creating the noise covariance matrix and then using equation (1) to actually design the coefficients for filters 161-N. It should be noted that the equation provides us with the required coefficients in the frequency domain. The time domain coefficients are obtained from the frequency domain coefficients.
To determine the optimal solution for any given scenario we first define the scenario in terms of the spatial distribution of the interfering sources (directions and relative intensity). For each of the interfering sources we assume a far field model. Let us consider an array of M identical omni-directional sensors with a known arbitrary geometry measuring the wave-field generated by a single far-field source. Let r; denote the location of the i-th sensor, where r; =[x;, y;, z;] and let ~ and B denote the azimuth and elevation angles of the radiating source, respectively.
Let us now define a differential delay vector, which expresses the delay in time of arrival of the interference wave front to the various elements:
T
~ -[~12~~13~ ... e~l,M, ~ ~Ij - ~j ~1' where the first sensor serves as a reference and the delays are measured relative to it.
S The signal "Direction Of Arrival" vector for the far field case is given by:
kX sin(6)cos(~) k = ky = sin(B)sin(~) . (6) k1 cos(B) Let us define a distance matrix R between the sensors of the array 10 __ r2 - r1 R = : (7) rM - r1 The time delay between any two sensors is equal to the projection of the distance vector between them along the k vector divided by the wave propagation velocity (sound velocity for example). Consequently, the delay vector can be expressed as follows:
i=-c where c is the wave velocity and the matrix R is composed of the distance vectors between all the sensors and the reference sensor. More explicitly, for sensor j we can write z,~ _ [x,~ cos(B) sin() + y,~ sin(B) sin() + z,~ cos(~)] / c (9) Assuming that interference i has an amplitude of s; and a Direction Of Arrival vector of k; then its measurement by the array can be expressed as the source steering vector multiplied by the source amplitude -~~T _~2~/c Y~ ~.f ) = S~b~ ~.f ) = See = see (lo) The contribution of source i to the noise covariance matrix is expresses as:
C; = E{YrYrt } (11) Since b; is deterministic and we assume stationary sources where s 2 is the power of the source i the above equation is reduced to (11 a) C; = Y~Ya Under the assumption that the interferences are uncorrelated we can write C = ~ C; ( 12) If we assume that there is an additive uncorrelated noise (spatially distributed white noise) n to each of the sensors we obtain C=nI+~C; (13) where I is the unity matrix with a size of [M x M].
So far we obtained the noise covariance matrix for a predetermined noise environment. In order to use equation (1) we need to calculate the steering vector v.
This steering vector expresses the look of the array towards a defined direction. The steering vector v is the conjugate of the vector already expressed in equation (4) and it is calculated in the same way as the steering vector of the noise sources (see (8) and (9)) where ~ and B are the azimuth and elevation of the look direction, respectively.
It should be noted that a far field model for the noises was used to obtain the above equations. It is not necessarily desirable to use a far field model for the target (desired signal). For example, one may want to implement a focusing effect on the target in near field situations. Such an effect can be obtained by manipulating the steering vector accordingly.
The fixed solution technique of Fig. 1, using equation (1), provides a way to calculate the gain weights of each sensor in an array for each frequency. More specifically, for each frequency of interest the system of Fig. 1, equation (1) is solved to yield one weight for each filter (wopt is a vector with the number of elements being equal to the number of sensors). Thus, if it is desired to obtain the optimum weights for ten frequencies, for example, equation (1) is solved for ten frequencies and each filter 161_N is then defined by ten frequency domain weights - the set of frequency domain weights for each filter defining the filter's frequency domain response.
Once the frequency response for each filter is determined, it is necessary to design the time domain filters to provide the determined frequency response. If the weights (or "gains") are real numbers - meaning that the desired filter has a linear phase - we can use the weights with any of the well-known methods to design the filter for each sensor. For example, a Remez Exchange Method can be used. For simple cases such as when the array is linear and the noise sources are positioned in a symmetric structure around the look direction, the gain weights would be real numbers.
If the gain weights are complex numbers, such as when the noise structure is not symmetric, the required filter will not have a linear phase. For these cases one can feed the weights for each filter to an IFFT (Inverse Fast Fourier Transform) procedure to obtain the time domain function that would provide the desired frequency response and phases for the filter.
2 - A method for designing and implementing fixed beam optimal filters based on the filtered references approach.
Fig. 2 is a block diagram of a filtered references type beamforming system in accordance the present invention. As can be seen from Fig. 2, N
microphones 261_N are conditioned and sampled by signal conditioners 281_N. The microphone outputs are processed by a delay and sum beamformer 30 to provide a beam channel, and by a reference channel processor 32 which is typical of an LMS beamforming system.
As shown, the beam channel may be formed via the classic delay and sum beamforming process on the inputs, however the alternatives include any linear combination of sensor outputs that will provide a maximum towards the looking (listening) direction.
The reference channels are processed such that a null is placed towards the looking direction. It may be obtained by subtracting one microphone form the other, or by forming some other linear combination of sensor outputs. The output of the reference channels is respectively stored in tapped delay lines 341_ (L may or may not be equal to I~ and filtered by filters 361_L via convolvers 381_N The filtered reference channel output is summed via an adder 40 and subtracted via a subtractor 42 from the beamformer output as delayed by a delay line 44. This structure is typical to adaptive beamformers, where the reference channels are filtered by adaptive filters and then summed and subtracted from the delayed main beam signal. In our case, the filters are fixed (non adaptive) and pre-designed. The method is highly practical in systems that already have the structure of an adaptive beamformer, which can be applied to both the adaptive solution and the fixed solution.
In the filtered references embodiment of Fig. 2, the filters' coefficients are designed and determined using equation (5). More particularly, the noise covariance matrix is determined and then used in equation (5) to determine the filter coefficients.
As was the case in the filtered input embodiment of Fig. 1, equation (5) provides filter coefficients in the frequency domain and it is necessary to obtain the time domain coefficients from the frequency domain coefficients.
Equation (5) is expressed as wop~ = C-'p where C is the noise covariance matrix as measured by the reference channels, and p is the correlation vector between the main channel (beam) output and the reference channels.
5 We obtain the noise covariance matrix using techniques that are similar to those used in the filtered inputs approach. The difference is that we need to obtain the noise received as it appears in the reference channels, and not as it appears at each sensor.
To do this, we first obtain the contribution of each noise source to each sensor (the same y; that we obtained in the previous method), and then find the contribution of each noise source to 10 each reference channels. The reference channels are generally relatively flat sensitivity patterns having nulls pointing to the array look direction. The reference channels are created using linear combinations of the elements' outputs after they have been steered to the look direction. For example xl+xz-(x3+x4) may be a reference channel after the inputs (denoted as x~) have been appropriately delayed to compensate for the look 15 direction. These relations can be expressed as a nulling matrix N (note again that in order to guarantee a signal free reference the sum of the elements of each row in the matrix should be 0).
Example for nulling matrix for an array of four microphones and three reference channels is N= 4 -3 1 1 1 (14) Note also that for an n elements array only n-1 independent nulls can be created. If we denote v as the steering vector to the look direction than we can obtain the contribution of the a noise source i to the reference channels through the following equation:
x; = N ~ diag(v) ~ y; (15) where diag(v) is the diagonal matrix which elements are the element of the vector v (for broad side array diag(v)=I - the unity matrix), y; is the interference contribution of noise source i measured by the array elements as described above, N is the a Nulling matrix used to create the reference channels and x; is the contribution of interference of noise source i as measured by the reference channels. Through equation (15) the contribution of a noise source is "transferred" from the array elements to the reference channels.
The overall noise measured the reference channels is the sum of the noise contributed by each interference.
x=~x; (16) where x is the noise measured at the reference channels.
The contribution of each x; to the noise covariance matrix is expressed as C; = E{x;x; } (17) As in the case of equation (11), since x is a multiplication of a stationery signal by a deterministic one (the steering elements) the equation is reduced to C; = x;x; (17a) Under the assumption that the interferences are uncorrelated we can write C=~C; (18) If we assume that there is an additive uncorrelated noise n (spatially distributed white noise) to each of the sensors we obtain C = nI + ~ C; ( 19) where I is the unity matrix with a size of [M x M].
We now need to find the correlation vector p. This vector expresses the correlation between the beam signal and the reference channels. The correlation vector p is given by:
P = ~ P a (20) where p; is given by p; = beam;x; (21) and beam; = v'y; (22) After obtaining both C and p equation (5) is used to find the gain weights for each frequency. The practicality of obtaining the weight for a series of discrete frequencies and the actual design of the filters was demonstrated above in relation to the filtered inputs method of Fig. 1.
An illustrative procedure for designing and implementing the fixed filtered references approach is shown in Fig. 2A. As can be seen from the figure, the first steps are to define the desired noise scenario, the array configuration and frequency range and resolution (step 50), and to initialize certain variables to be used in the procedure(step52). Next, the contribution of a first noise source to the noise covariance matrix - at the array output - is computed (step 54). The noise source's contribution to reference channel noise covariance matrix is then computed on the basis of the source's contribution at the array output, the nulling matrix and the steering vector toward the array look direction (step 56) is computed, and the correlation vector between the beam signal and the reference channels for the source is determined (step 58).
At this point a determination is made as to whether each source has been considered in steps 52-58 (step 60). If not all noise sources have been considered, a count variable is incremented (step 62) and steps 52-58 are performed for the next noise source. If all noise sources have been considered, the contributions of each noise source to each reference channel are summed to generate a reference channel covariance matrix and the beam/reference channels correlation vectors are added to determine a beam/reference channel correlation matrix (step 64). Once the reference channel noise covariance matrix and correlation matrix are determined for a particular frequency under consideration, a filter coefficient corresponding to that frequency is determined for each channel according to equation (5) (step 66).
A determination is then made if each desired frequency has been considered (step 68) If not all frequencies have been considered, a count variable is incremented (step 70) and steps 52-68 are performed for the next frequency. If all frequencies have been considered, a filter design program is used to obtain the filter time domain coefficients that approximate the desired response as defined by the frequency domain coefficients determined in step 66 (step 72).
3- A hybrid system that includes both a fixed solution and an adaptive one.
Adaptive systems are designed to provide the optimum solution to the noise environment at any time. Using the reference channel type approach, an adaptive system measures and studies the noise sources through the reference channels and subtracts it utilizing LMS filters. A major problem of an adaptive system is the leakage problem. The desired signal "leaks" into the reference channel nulls due to differences in the sensors' sensitivity and phases, or due to mechanical imperfections.
The leakage of the desired signal into the nulls causes the system to try and cancel the desired signal as though it was noise, and thereby causes distortion in reception of the desired signal.
One way to prevent signal distortion due to leakage is by blocking (or freezing) the adaptive process when a strong desired signal is detected, and thus prevent the adaptive process from attempting to cancel the desired signal. However, regardless of the logic of the adaptive process blockage, blocking has the effect of locking the noise reduction filters on the solution existing immediately before blockage commenced, resulting in the filters losing their relevancy in time.
In order to overcome the ameliorate the problems associated with leakage and blocking, the present invention provides a system in which the filters' 5 coefficients drift form their adaptive solution into a pre-designed fixed solution. The system initializes its filters' coefficients with the fixed pre-designed solution and fades into the fixed solution whenever the adaptive process is blocked. The drifting mechanism is implemented in the following way: let w;(n) be the i-th coefficient of an adaptive filter at time n, and let w(0) be the fixed value of that filter coefficient, then 10 w;(n+1)=w;(n)*y+w;(0)*(1-y) (23) where y determines how fast the filter will converge into its fixed solution.
The drifting process of the invention serves another purpose. It has been 1 S shown that the adaptive process may explode (or diverge) due to numerical problems when the process is performed by a fixed-point processor (see Limited Precision Effects in Adaptive Filtering - John M. Cioffi - IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems vol cas-34 no. 7, Jul 1987). To prevent such a divergent breakdown, it is sometimes useful to apply a "leaky filter". A leaky filter multiplies its coefficients by a 20 number smaller than one before they get updated, thus preventing divergence due to numerical problems. Although the leaky process does not allow the filter to converge to the optimum solution, it prevents mathematical divergence.
The use of the decaying process proposed here will eliminate the need to use a strong leaky process (or any leaky process) since whenever the adaptive process is blocked the whole adaptive process is actually reset. Also it is possible to be more generous in the blocking logic - meaning it is possible to allow it to happen more often, since the filter will fade into a sub optimal, but fairly good, solution and the pitfalls normally associated with blocking are avoided.
4- Alternative approaches to design and implement fixed beam filters In parts one and two of this description fixed beamformer implementations of the invention were presented. In these two implementations one simulates a noise structure by placing noise sources in the sphere, then the noise covariance matrix is calculated and the optimum filter for that noise structure is obtained. In part three of the description a hybrid beamformer implementation was discussed. In the third implementation, an adaptive process is employed when there are significant noises to adapt to, and the fixed solution kicks in when the adaptive process in inhibited for some reason (e.g. a strong signal).
It is proposed here that, assuming one has the infrastructure for an adaptive solution, it can be utilized to obtain the fixed solution using the adaptive process. For example, lets assume that the adaptive process is implemented on an off line system using high-level language (like Matlab for example). One can simulate the noise structure off line, i.e. obtain the noise signal on each of the microphones (time domain noise sources multiplied by the source steering vector). This noise data can then be fed into the simulated off line adaptive process. Once the adaptive process converges, one can read the final values of the filters' coefficients and use them as the optimum solution for the pre-defined noise situation. The disadvantage of using the adaptive process in a simulated environment to obtain the fixed weights is that it is time consuming. Large data files need to be prepared for the filters to converge and the adaptive process is a very computation intensive when it is done off line.
Also, the existence of an adaptive system simulation has been assumed, and if one does not exist it needs to be prepared:-The advantage-of this method is that it would provide a more accurate solution than the direct methods. The reason is that the direct methods determine the gain weight in the frequency domain. It is then necessary to go through a filter design process that is, by nature, an approximation and includes inherent compromises, over which we have no control. Even more so, in the methods discussed in parts one and two each filter is designed separately and we have no guaranty that the overall beamformer performance (using all the filters concurrently) could not provide a better solution.
Running the simulated data through the adaptive process assure us that we get the optimum solution for the simulated scenario, that is for the simulated noise environment and array structure. For example, if we use the reference channel type adaptive filter, the solution will take into account the specific way we actually implemented the reference channels - which the separate filter design discussed in part two does not take into account.
Another approach proposed in this invention assumes that there is a real time working adaptive system. The simulated noise data can be stored on a recording media, such as a mufti-channel digital tape recorder, or a computer equipped with a mufti-channel sound card. The noise data can be injected into the real time working system which will converge to the solution, freeze the final filters' coefficients and either store them permanently as the fixed solution or transmit them to a hosting system to be burned into the fixed beamformer solution. The advantage of this method is that once the noise data is prepared, the solution is obtained very fast. The adaptive filter will converge within seconds. Another advantage of this method is that the fixed solution will take into account all kinds of implementation related issues like - fixed point and numerical inaccuracies, final dynamic range of the system, differences in the input ports of the processor like different A/D converters and so on.
Taking the above approach one step further, the present invention proposes to create a simulated noise environment using loudspeakers in an an-echoic chamber, then-running the adaptive system in the chamber and freezing the final values of coefficients as the fixed array solution. Loudspeakers are placed in an an-echoic chamber to simulate a certain noise scenario - for example two loudspeakers can be placed on each side of the array at 40 degrees and 75 degrees azimuth angle. A
simulated noise is played through the loudspeakers - for example pink wide band noise.
The adaptive system runs and converges (within seconds) and the final filters' coefficients are stored. The process can be automated - the adaptive system is put in a calibration mode, the adaptive system converges and than stores coefficients converged to as in its own memory as the fixed solution. The calibrated system is than switched off from the calibration mode for normal operation.
The advantage of using the actual working adaptive system is that the convergence solution takes into account not just the process itself with all its peculiarities like dynamic range of the processor and the exact implementation of the filters, but also unknown factors like the microphones sensitivities and phases, mechanical interferences and so on. This is particularly important since it has been observed that the fixed solution is very sensitive to some parameters like mismatch in S phases. Also, if the sensors are microphones, for example, and cardioids (uni directional) microphones are used instead of omni directional microphones, then the mismatch in phase may be such that the actual performance of the filters may be far from what was pre-designed. The packaging of the microphone (or other sensor) array may also affect the performance strongly. Using the real working adaptive system to adaptively generate the fixed solution coefficients takes all these parameters into account and ensures an optimum solution the given system.
The disadvantage of the method is that, in general, it is necessary to use many simulated noise sources in order to achieve desirable performance improvement.
Use of one noise source located at one side of an array, for example, may cause the array to adapt such that the noise source is effectively cancelled while the beam shape on the array side opposite is undesirable. However, for a relatively small array, where the fixed super directionality is most needed, few noise sources will usually be sufficient to provide an improved performance. For instance, in a four cardioids microphone array with an aperture of 6" four noise sources are sufficient to provide a noise rejection of 20 dB at angles over 30 degrees from the look direction.
An illustrative procedure for generating fixed filter coefficients through the use of simulated noise and an actual adaptive system positioned in an an-echoic chamber is shown Fig. 3. The first step is to create four random noise files having a white or pink spectrum and a duration of 30 seconds or more (step 74). Next, four speakers and an adaptive beamforming system are place in an an-echoic chamber, with the angles between the speakers and array look direction being set at -70°, -40°, 40° and 70° (step 76). The four noise files are fed to the loudspeakers (step 78) and the adaptive 5 system is allowed to converge to the optimal solution and the filter coefficients corresponding to the optimal solution are stored (step 80).
Another technique to calibrate a system is proposed here. The microphone array is placed in the an-echoic chamber and the simulated noise is played through the loudspeakers. The output of the array is recorded (no real time DSP system 10 is present in the chamber). The recorded output is then replayed into the real time system. The adaptive process converges and the final filters' coefficients are stored and burned into the system as the fixed array solution. This method is sometimes more practical when the automatic calibration and burning mechanism is not implemented. It is highly inconvenient to perform the down loading and uploading of the coefficient 1 S from a system that is positioned in the chamber. This operation usually requires a development system (like In Circuit Emulator or a simulator). It is much more convenient to do the recording in the chamber and perform the down loading and uploading of coefficients outside were the development system is located.
An illustrative procedure for generating fixed filter coefficients through 20 the use of simulated noise, a microphone array positioned in an an-echoic chamber and an actual adaptive system positioned outside an an-echoic chamber is shown in Fig. 4.
As in the procedure of Fig. 3, the first step in the Fig. 4 procedure is to create four random noise files having a white or pink spectrum and a duration of 30 (step 82). The WO 01/37435 PCT/~JS00/41537 next is to place four speakers and an a microphone array in an an-echoic chamber, with the angles between the speakers and array look direction being set at -70°, -40°, 40° and_ 70° (step 84). The four noise files are fed to the loudspeakers (step 86) and the microphone array's output is recorded on a mufti-channel recorder (step 88).
The recorded output is then played into an adaptive beamformer system which is located outside the an-echoic chamber and the beamformer is allowed to converge to the optimal solution, the coefficients corresponding to the optimal solution being stored for use as the fixed filter coefficients (step 90).
Fig. 5 shows an illustrative procedure for generating simulated noise and using the simulated noise to generate fixed beamformer coefficients. The first step in the procedure is to define the desired noise field scenario and the array configuration (step 90). Next, a counting variable indicative of the noise source being considered is initialized to one (step 94). A random signal is generated to represent the noise emanating from the source under consideration (step 96), and for each sensor, the contribution of noise from the source under consideration is calculated.
Calculation of noise source contributions involves; initializing to one a counting variable indicative of the sensor under consideration (step 98); determining the time delay from the source to the sensor under consideration, relative to the time delay to other sensors (step 100);
and determining the noise source contribution based on the random signal generated in step 96 and the time delay (step 102).
After the noise contribution of a source to a particular sensor is calculated, a determination is made as to whether all sensors have been considered (step 104). If all sensors have not been considered, the sensor counting variable is incremented (step 106) and the procedure returns to step 98. When all sensors have been considered for a particular source, a determination is made as to whether all _ sources have been considered (step 108), and if not, the source counting variable is incremented (step 110) and the procedure returns to step 96. Once the contribution of each noise source to each sensor has been calculated the generation of the simulated noise data is complete. The noise data is then fed to an adaptive procedure which is allowed to converge, and the coefficients derived from the converged operation are stored for use as the optimal fixed coefficients (step 112).
While the present invention has been particularly shown and described in conjunction with preferred embodiments thereof, it will be readily appreciated by those of ordinary skill in the art that various changes may be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention. Therefore, it is intended that the appended claims be interpreted as including the embodiments described herein as well as all equivalents thereto.
Claims (48)
1. A sensor array for receiving a signal that includes a desired signal and noise, comprising:
a plurality of sensors;
a plurality of filters for filtering the output of each sensor, each filter being defined by one or more filter coefficients; and a means for combining the-outputs of said filters to form a sensor array output signal;
wherein said filter coefficients are adaptively determined so as to maximize the signal to noise ratio of the array output signal, and wherein upon the occurrence of a predetermined event the adaptive determination of said filter coefficients is stopped and said filter coefficients are faded into a predetermined set of fixed coefficients.
a plurality of sensors;
a plurality of filters for filtering the output of each sensor, each filter being defined by one or more filter coefficients; and a means for combining the-outputs of said filters to form a sensor array output signal;
wherein said filter coefficients are adaptively determined so as to maximize the signal to noise ratio of the array output signal, and wherein upon the occurrence of a predetermined event the adaptive determination of said filter coefficients is stopped and said filter coefficients are faded into a predetermined set of fixed coefficients.
2. The sensor array as set forth in claim 1, wherein said sensors are microphones.
3. The sensor array as set forth in claim 1, wherein said filter coefficients are frequency domain coefficients such that for each said filter said frequency domain coefficients determine the frequency response of said filter.
4. The sensor array as set forth in claim 1, wherein said filter coefficients are time domain coefficients.
5. The sensor array as set forth in claim 4, further comprising:
a plurality of delay lines, said delay lines corresponding to respective outputs of said sensors and receiving respective outputs from said sensors;
and a plurality of convolvers, corresponding to respective outputs of said delay lines, said convolvers being operative to receive respective outputs from said delay lines and convolve the received outputs with respective filter coefficients to generate a plurality of filtered delay line outputs;
wherein said plurality of filtered delay line outputs are combined by said means for combining to form said array output.
a plurality of delay lines, said delay lines corresponding to respective outputs of said sensors and receiving respective outputs from said sensors;
and a plurality of convolvers, corresponding to respective outputs of said delay lines, said convolvers being operative to receive respective outputs from said delay lines and convolve the received outputs with respective filter coefficients to generate a plurality of filtered delay line outputs;
wherein said plurality of filtered delay line outputs are combined by said means for combining to form said array output.
6. The sensor array as set forth in claim 5, further comprising a plurality of signal conditioners for receiving respective outputs from said sensors, sampling the received outputs and passing the sampled received outputs to respective delay lines.
7. The sensor array as set forth in claim 1, wherein said fixed filter coefficients are determined by solving directly and non-adaptively an equation where C is the noise covariance matrix, v is the steering vector toward the array look direction, and w opt is a vector having a number of components equal to the number of sensors, and where solving said equation for "n"
frequencies provides "n" coefficients for each filter.
frequencies provides "n" coefficients for each filter.
8. The sensor array as set forth in claim 1, wherein said fixed filter coefficients are determined by placing the array in a simulated noise environment, letting the adaptation of the filter weights converge to a solution and then setting the fixed filter coefficients equal to the coefficients of the converged adaptive solution.
9, The sensor array as set forth in claim 1, wherein said fixed filter coefficients are determined by simulating a noise environment and the array's response to said noise environment, letting the simulated adaptation of the filter weights converge to a solution and then storing the coefficients of the converged adaptive solution for use as the fixed weights of an actual array.
10. The sensor array as set forth in claim 1, wherein said fixed filter coefficients are determined by simulating a noise environment, recording the simulated noise generated in said environment, playing back said simulated noise for reception by the array, letting the adaptation of the filter weights converge to a solution and then setting the fixed filter coefficients of the array equal to the coefficients of the converged adaptive solution.
11. An sensor array for receiving signal that includes a desired signal and noise, comprising:
a plurality of sensors;
a delay and sum beamformer for combining the outputs of said sensors to generate a beamformer output;
a reference channel processor for combining the outputs of said sensors to generate one or more reference channel signals;
at least one filter for each said reference channel, each said filter being defined by one or more coefficients; and means for combining the outputs of said filters with said beamformer output to generate a sensor array output signal;
wherein said reference channel processor and said filters operate to maximize the signal to noise ratio of the array output signal, wherein said filter coefficients are adaptively determined so as to maximize the signal to noise ratio of the array output signal, and wherein upon the occurrence of a predetermined event the adaptive determination of said filter coefficients is stopped and said filter coefficients faded into a predetermined set of fixed coefficients.
a plurality of sensors;
a delay and sum beamformer for combining the outputs of said sensors to generate a beamformer output;
a reference channel processor for combining the outputs of said sensors to generate one or more reference channel signals;
at least one filter for each said reference channel, each said filter being defined by one or more coefficients; and means for combining the outputs of said filters with said beamformer output to generate a sensor array output signal;
wherein said reference channel processor and said filters operate to maximize the signal to noise ratio of the array output signal, wherein said filter coefficients are adaptively determined so as to maximize the signal to noise ratio of the array output signal, and wherein upon the occurrence of a predetermined event the adaptive determination of said filter coefficients is stopped and said filter coefficients faded into a predetermined set of fixed coefficients.
12. The sensor array as set forth in claim 11, wherein said sensors are microphones.
13. The sensor array as set forth in claim 11, wherein said filter coefficients are frequency domain coefficients such that for each said filter said frequency domain coefficients determine the frequency response of said filter.
14. The sensor array as set forth in claim 1, wherein said filter coefficients are time domain coefficients.
15. The sensor array as set forth in claim 14, further comprising:
a main channel delay line for delaying the output of said beamformer;
a plurality of reference channel delay lines, said reference channel delay lines corresponding to respective reference channel signals and receiving respective reference channel signals; and a plurality of convolvers, corresponding to respective outputs of said reference channel delay lines, said convolvers being operative to receive respective outputs from said reference channel delay lines and convolve the received outputs with respective filter coefficients to generate a plurality of filtered delay line outputs;
wherein said plurality of filtered delay line outputs and said main channel delay line output are combined by said means for combining to form said array output.
a main channel delay line for delaying the output of said beamformer;
a plurality of reference channel delay lines, said reference channel delay lines corresponding to respective reference channel signals and receiving respective reference channel signals; and a plurality of convolvers, corresponding to respective outputs of said reference channel delay lines, said convolvers being operative to receive respective outputs from said reference channel delay lines and convolve the received outputs with respective filter coefficients to generate a plurality of filtered delay line outputs;
wherein said plurality of filtered delay line outputs and said main channel delay line output are combined by said means for combining to form said array output.
16. The sensor array as set forth in claim 15, further comprising a plurality of signal conditioners for receiving respective outputs from said sensors, sampling the received outputs and passing the sampled received outputs to said delay and sum beamformer and said reference channel processor.
17. The sensor array as set forth in claim 11, wherein said fixed filter coefficients are determined by solving directly and non-adaptively an equation w opt=C-1p where C is the noise covariance matrix, p is a vector representing the correlation between the output of said beamformer and the output of said reference channels, and w opt is a vector having a number of components equal to the number of sensors, and where solving said equation for "n" frequencies provides "n"
coefficients for each filter.
coefficients for each filter.
18. The sensor array as set forth in claim 11, wherein said fixed filter coefficients are determined by placing the array in a simulated noise environment, letting the adaptation of the filter weights converge to a solution and then setting the fixed filter coefficients equal to the coefficients of the converged adaptive.
19. The sensor array as set forth in claim 11, wherein said fixed filter coefficients are determined by simulating a noise environment and the array's response to said noise environment, letting the simulated adaptation of the filter weights converge to a solution and then storing the coefficients of the converged adaptive solution for use as the fixed weights of an actual array.
20. The sensor array as set forth in claim 11, wherein said fixed filter coefficients are determined by simulating a noise environment, recording the simulated noise generated in said environment, playing back said simulated noise for reception by the array, letting the adaptation of the filter weights converge to a solution and then setting the fixed filter coefficients of the array equal to the coefficients of the converged adaptive solution.
21. A method of processing a received signal that includes a desired signal and noise, comprising the steps of:
providing an array of sensors;
filtering the output of each sensor through a filter, each filter being defined by one or more filter coefficients; and combining the outputs of said filters to form a sensor array output signal;
wherein said filter coefficients are adaptively determined so as to maximize the signal to noise ratio of the array output signal, and wherein upon the occurrence of a predetermined event the adaptive determination of said filter coefficients is stopped and said filter coefficients are faded into a predetermined set of fixed coefficients.
providing an array of sensors;
filtering the output of each sensor through a filter, each filter being defined by one or more filter coefficients; and combining the outputs of said filters to form a sensor array output signal;
wherein said filter coefficients are adaptively determined so as to maximize the signal to noise ratio of the array output signal, and wherein upon the occurrence of a predetermined event the adaptive determination of said filter coefficients is stopped and said filter coefficients are faded into a predetermined set of fixed coefficients.
22. The method according to claim 21, wherein said sensors are microphones.
23. The method according to claim 21, wherein said filter coefficients are frequency domain coefficients such that for each said filter said frequency domain coefficients determine the frequency response of said filter.
24. The method according to claim 21, wherein said filter coefficients are time domain coefficients.
25. The method according to claim 24, further comprising the steps of:
receiving the outputs of said sensors at a plurality of respective delay lines;
receiving the outputs of said delay lines at respective convolvers;
convolving the received delay line outputs with respective filter coefficients to generate a plurality of filtered delay line outputs; and combining said plurality of filtered delay line outputs to generate said array output.
receiving the outputs of said sensors at a plurality of respective delay lines;
receiving the outputs of said delay lines at respective convolvers;
convolving the received delay line outputs with respective filter coefficients to generate a plurality of filtered delay line outputs; and combining said plurality of filtered delay line outputs to generate said array output.
26. The sensor array as set forth in claim 25, further comprising the steps of:
receiving the outputs of said sensors at respective signal conditioners;
and sampling the received outputs and passing the sampled received outputs to respective delay lines.
receiving the outputs of said sensors at respective signal conditioners;
and sampling the received outputs and passing the sampled received outputs to respective delay lines.
27. The sensor array as set forth in claim 21, wherein said fixed filter coefficients are determined by solving directly and non-adaptively an equation where C is the noise covariance matrix, v is the steering vector toward the array look direction, and w opt is a vector having a number of components equal to the number of sensors, and where solving said equation for "n"
frequencies provides "n" coefficients for each filter.
frequencies provides "n" coefficients for each filter.
28. The sensor array as set forth in claim 21, wherein said fixed filter coefficients are determined by placing the array in a simulated noise environment, letting the adaptation of the filter weights converge to a solution and then setting the fixed filter coefficients equal to the coefficients of the converged adaptive solution.
29. The sensor array as set forth in claim 21, wherein said fixed filter coefficients are determined by simulating a noise environment and the array's response to said noise environment, letting the simulated adaptation of the filter weights converge to a solution and then storing the coefficients of the converged adaptive solution for use as the fixed weights of an actual array.
30. The sensor array as set forth in claim 21, wherein said fixed filter coefficients are determined by simulating a noise environment, recording the simulated noise generated in said environment, playing back said simulated noise for reception by the array, letting the adaptation of the filter weights converge to a solution and then setting the fixed filter coefficients of the array equal to the coefficients of the converged adaptive solution.
31. A method for receiving a signal that includes a desired signal and noise, comprising the steps of:
providing an array of sensors;
generating a beamformer output by passing the outputs of said sensors through a delay and sum beamformer;
generating one or more reference channel signals by passing the outputs of said sensors through a reference channel processor;
filtering each reference channel using at least one filter, each said filter being defined by one or more coefficients; and combining the outputs of said filters with said beamformer output to generate a sensor array output signal;
wherein said reference channel processor and said filters operate to maximize the signal to noise ration of the array output signal, wherein said filter coefficients are adaptively determined so as to maximize the signal to noise ratio of the array output signal, and wherein upon the occurrence of a predetermined event the adaptive determination of said filter coefficients is stopped and said filter coefficients are faded into a predetermined set of fixed coefficients.
providing an array of sensors;
generating a beamformer output by passing the outputs of said sensors through a delay and sum beamformer;
generating one or more reference channel signals by passing the outputs of said sensors through a reference channel processor;
filtering each reference channel using at least one filter, each said filter being defined by one or more coefficients; and combining the outputs of said filters with said beamformer output to generate a sensor array output signal;
wherein said reference channel processor and said filters operate to maximize the signal to noise ration of the array output signal, wherein said filter coefficients are adaptively determined so as to maximize the signal to noise ratio of the array output signal, and wherein upon the occurrence of a predetermined event the adaptive determination of said filter coefficients is stopped and said filter coefficients are faded into a predetermined set of fixed coefficients.
32. The method according to claim 31, wherein said sensors are microphones.
33. The method according to claim 31, wherein said filter coefficients are frequency domain coefficients such that for each said filter said frequency domain coefficients determine the frequency response of said filter.
34. The method according to claim 31, wherein said filter coefficients are time domain coefficients.
35. The method according to claim 34, further comprising the steps of:
delaying the output of said beamformer via a main channel delay line;
delaying said reference channel signals via respective reference channel delay lines;
convolving the outputs of said reference channel delay lines with respective filter coefficients to generate a plurality of filtered delay line outputs; and combining said filtered delay line outputs and said main channel delay line output to generate said array output.
delaying the output of said beamformer via a main channel delay line;
delaying said reference channel signals via respective reference channel delay lines;
convolving the outputs of said reference channel delay lines with respective filter coefficients to generate a plurality of filtered delay line outputs; and combining said filtered delay line outputs and said main channel delay line output to generate said array output.
36. The method according to claim 35, further comprising the steps of:
receiving the outputs of said sensors at respective signal conditioners; and sampling the received outputs and passing the sampled received outputs to said delay and sum beamformer and said reference channel processor.
receiving the outputs of said sensors at respective signal conditioners; and sampling the received outputs and passing the sampled received outputs to said delay and sum beamformer and said reference channel processor.
37. The method according to claim 31, wherein said fixed filter coefficients are determined by solving directly and non-adaptively an equation w opt=C-1p where C is the noise covariance matrix, p is a vector representing the correlation between the output of said beamformer and the output of said reference channels, and w opt is a vector having a number of components equal to the number of sensors, and where solving said equation for "n" frequencies provides "n" coefficients for each filter.
38. The method according to claim 31, wherein said fixed filter coefficients are determined by placing the array in a simulated noise environment, letting the adaptation of the filter weights converge to a solution and then setting the fixed filter coefficients equal to the coefficients of the converged adaptive.
39. The method according to claim 31, wherein said fixed filter coefficients are determined by simulating a noise environment and the array's response to said noise environment, letting the simulated adaptation of the filter weights converge to a solution and then storing the coefficients of the converged adaptive solution for use as the fixed weights of an actual array.
40. The method according to claim 31, wherein said fixed filter coefficients are determined by simulating a noise environment, recording the simulated noise generated in said environment, playing back said simulated noise for reception by the array, letting the adaptation of the filter weights converge to a solution and then setting the fixed filter coefficients of the array equal to the coefficients of the converged adaptive solution.
41. A sensor array for receiving a signal that includes a desired signal and noise, comprising:
a plurality of sensors;
a plurality of filters for filtering the output of each sensor, each filter being defined by one or more filter coefficients; and a means for combining the outputs of said filters to form a sensor array output signal;
wherein said filter coefficients are determined by solving an equation where C is the noise covariance matrix, v is the steering vector toward the array look direction, and w opt is a vector having a number of components equal to the number of sensors, and where solving said equation for "n"
frequencies provides "n" coefficients for each filter; and wherein said noise covariance matrix is determined by defining a spatial distribution of noise sources; defining a delay vector for each noise source using said spatial distribution, said delay vector expressing the relative times of arrival of the wavefront from said noise source at each sensor; defining a steering vector for each said noise source based on said delay vector; using said steering vector to determine the contribution of each noise source to said noise covariance matrix; and generating said noise covariance matrix by adding the contributions of each noise source and a matrix indicative of spatially distributed white noise.
a plurality of sensors;
a plurality of filters for filtering the output of each sensor, each filter being defined by one or more filter coefficients; and a means for combining the outputs of said filters to form a sensor array output signal;
wherein said filter coefficients are determined by solving an equation where C is the noise covariance matrix, v is the steering vector toward the array look direction, and w opt is a vector having a number of components equal to the number of sensors, and where solving said equation for "n"
frequencies provides "n" coefficients for each filter; and wherein said noise covariance matrix is determined by defining a spatial distribution of noise sources; defining a delay vector for each noise source using said spatial distribution, said delay vector expressing the relative times of arrival of the wavefront from said noise source at each sensor; defining a steering vector for each said noise source based on said delay vector; using said steering vector to determine the contribution of each noise source to said noise covariance matrix; and generating said noise covariance matrix by adding the contributions of each noise source and a matrix indicative of spatially distributed white noise.
42. The sensor array as set forth in claim 41, wherein said equation is solved for "n"
frequencies to yield "n" coefficients for each filter, and for each filter, said "n"
coefficients are used to generate filter design values according to an operation selected from the group consisting of a Remez Exchange operation and an Inverse Fourier Transform operation.
frequencies to yield "n" coefficients for each filter, and for each filter, said "n"
coefficients are used to generate filter design values according to an operation selected from the group consisting of a Remez Exchange operation and an Inverse Fourier Transform operation.
43. An sensor array for receiving signal that includes a desired signal and noise, comprising:
a plurality of sensors;
a delay and sum beamformer for combining the outputs of said sensors to generate a beamformer output;
a reference channel processor for combining the outputs of said sensors to generate one or more reference channel signals;
at least one filter for each said reference channel, each said filter being defined by one or more coefficients; and means for combining the outputs of said filters with said beamformer output to generate a sensor array output signal;
wherein said-filter coefficients are determined by solving an equation where C is the noise covariance matrix, p is a vector representing the correlation between the output of said beamformer and the output of said reference channels, and w opt is a vector having a number of components equal to the number of sensors, and where solving said equation for "n" frequencies provides "n"
coefficients for each filter; and wherein said noise covariance matrix is determined by defining a spatial distribution of noise sources; defining a delay vector for each noise source using said spatial distribution, said delay vector expressing the relative times of arrival of the wavefront from said noise source at each sensor; defining a steering vector for each said noise source based on said delay vector; using said steering vector to determine the contribution of each noise source to said noise covariance matrix as measured at the sensors; defining a nulling matrix which indicates how said filter outputs are combined to generate said reference channels; determining an array steering vector towards the array look direction; determining the contribution of each noise source to each reference channel based on said contribution of each noise source at said sensors, said nulling matrix and said array steering vector; and generating said noise covariance matrix by adding the contributions of each noise source to said reference channels and a matrix indicative of spatially distributed white noise
a plurality of sensors;
a delay and sum beamformer for combining the outputs of said sensors to generate a beamformer output;
a reference channel processor for combining the outputs of said sensors to generate one or more reference channel signals;
at least one filter for each said reference channel, each said filter being defined by one or more coefficients; and means for combining the outputs of said filters with said beamformer output to generate a sensor array output signal;
wherein said-filter coefficients are determined by solving an equation where C is the noise covariance matrix, p is a vector representing the correlation between the output of said beamformer and the output of said reference channels, and w opt is a vector having a number of components equal to the number of sensors, and where solving said equation for "n" frequencies provides "n"
coefficients for each filter; and wherein said noise covariance matrix is determined by defining a spatial distribution of noise sources; defining a delay vector for each noise source using said spatial distribution, said delay vector expressing the relative times of arrival of the wavefront from said noise source at each sensor; defining a steering vector for each said noise source based on said delay vector; using said steering vector to determine the contribution of each noise source to said noise covariance matrix as measured at the sensors; defining a nulling matrix which indicates how said filter outputs are combined to generate said reference channels; determining an array steering vector towards the array look direction; determining the contribution of each noise source to each reference channel based on said contribution of each noise source at said sensors, said nulling matrix and said array steering vector; and generating said noise covariance matrix by adding the contributions of each noise source to said reference channels and a matrix indicative of spatially distributed white noise
44. The sensor array as set forth in claim 43, wherein said equation is solved for "n" frequencies to yield "n" coefficients for each filter, and for each filter, said "n"
coefficients are used to generate filter design values according to an operation selected from the group consisting of a Remez Exchange operation and an Inverse Fourier Transform operation.
coefficients are used to generate filter design values according to an operation selected from the group consisting of a Remez Exchange operation and an Inverse Fourier Transform operation.
45. A method of processing a received signal that includes a desired signal and noise, comprising the steps of providing an array of sensors;
filtering the output of each sensor through a filter, each filter being defined by one or more filter coefficients; and combining the outputs of said filters to form a sensor array output signal;
wherein said filter coefficients are determined by solving an equation where C is the noise covariance matrix, v is the steering vector toward the array look direction, and w opt is a vector having a number of components equal to the number of sensors, and where solving said equation for "n"
frequencies provides "n" coefficients for each filter; and wherein said noise covariance matrix is determined by defining a spatial distribution of noise sources; defining a delay vector for each noise source using said spatial distribution, said delay vector expressing the relative times of arrival of the wavefront from said noise source at each sensor; defining a steering vector for each said noise source based on said delay vector; using said steering vector to determine the contribution of each noise source to said noise covariance matrix; and generating said noise covariance matrix by adding the contributions of each noise source and a matrix indicative of spatially distributed white noise.
filtering the output of each sensor through a filter, each filter being defined by one or more filter coefficients; and combining the outputs of said filters to form a sensor array output signal;
wherein said filter coefficients are determined by solving an equation where C is the noise covariance matrix, v is the steering vector toward the array look direction, and w opt is a vector having a number of components equal to the number of sensors, and where solving said equation for "n"
frequencies provides "n" coefficients for each filter; and wherein said noise covariance matrix is determined by defining a spatial distribution of noise sources; defining a delay vector for each noise source using said spatial distribution, said delay vector expressing the relative times of arrival of the wavefront from said noise source at each sensor; defining a steering vector for each said noise source based on said delay vector; using said steering vector to determine the contribution of each noise source to said noise covariance matrix; and generating said noise covariance matrix by adding the contributions of each noise source and a matrix indicative of spatially distributed white noise.
46. The method according to in claim 45, wherein said equation is solved for "n" frequencies to yield "n" coefficients for each filter, and for each filter, said "n"
coefficients are used to generate filter design values according to an operation selected from the group consisting of a Remez Exchange operation and an Inverse Fourier Transform operation.
coefficients are used to generate filter design values according to an operation selected from the group consisting of a Remez Exchange operation and an Inverse Fourier Transform operation.
47. A method of processing a received signal that includes a desired signal and noise, comprising the steps of providing an array of sensors;
generating a beamformer output by passing the outputs of said sensors through a delay and sum beamformer;
generating one or more reference channel signals by passing the outputs of said sensors through a reference channel processor;
filtering each reference channel using at least one filter, each said filter being defined by one or more coefficients; and combining the outputs of said filters with said beamformer output to generate a sensor array output signal;
wherein said filter coefficients are determined by solving an equation where C is the noise covariance matrix, p is a vector representing the correlation between the output of said beamformer and the output of said reference channels, and w opt is a vector having a number of components equal to the number of sensors, and where solving said equation for "n" frequencies provides "n"
coefficients for each filter; and wherein said noise covariance matrix is determined by defining a spatial distribution of noise sources; defining a delay vector for each noise source using said spatial distribution, said delay vector expressing the relative times of arrival of the wavefront from said noise source at each sensor; defining a steering vector for each said noise source based on said delay vector; using said steering vector to determine the contribution of each noise source to said noise covariance matrix as measured at the sensors; defining a nulling matrix which indicates how said filter outputs are combined to generate said reference channels; determining an array steering vector towards the array look direction; determining the contribution of each noise source to each reference channel based on said contribution of each noise source at said sensors, said nulling matrix and said array steering vector; and generating said noise covariance matrix by adding the contributions of each noise source to said reference channels and a matrix indicative of spatially distributed white noise.
generating a beamformer output by passing the outputs of said sensors through a delay and sum beamformer;
generating one or more reference channel signals by passing the outputs of said sensors through a reference channel processor;
filtering each reference channel using at least one filter, each said filter being defined by one or more coefficients; and combining the outputs of said filters with said beamformer output to generate a sensor array output signal;
wherein said filter coefficients are determined by solving an equation where C is the noise covariance matrix, p is a vector representing the correlation between the output of said beamformer and the output of said reference channels, and w opt is a vector having a number of components equal to the number of sensors, and where solving said equation for "n" frequencies provides "n"
coefficients for each filter; and wherein said noise covariance matrix is determined by defining a spatial distribution of noise sources; defining a delay vector for each noise source using said spatial distribution, said delay vector expressing the relative times of arrival of the wavefront from said noise source at each sensor; defining a steering vector for each said noise source based on said delay vector; using said steering vector to determine the contribution of each noise source to said noise covariance matrix as measured at the sensors; defining a nulling matrix which indicates how said filter outputs are combined to generate said reference channels; determining an array steering vector towards the array look direction; determining the contribution of each noise source to each reference channel based on said contribution of each noise source at said sensors, said nulling matrix and said array steering vector; and generating said noise covariance matrix by adding the contributions of each noise source to said reference channels and a matrix indicative of spatially distributed white noise.
48. The method according to claim 47, wherein said equation is solved for "n" frequencies to yield "n" coefficients for each filter, and for each filter, said "n"
coefficients are used to generate filter design values according to an operation selected from the group consisting of a Remez Exchange operation and an Inverse Fourier Transform operation.
coefficients are used to generate filter design values according to an operation selected from the group consisting of a Remez Exchange operation and an Inverse Fourier Transform operation.
Applications Claiming Priority (3)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US09/427,410 US6594367B1 (en) | 1999-10-25 | 1999-10-25 | Super directional beamforming design and implementation |
US09/427,410 | 1999-10-25 | ||
PCT/US2000/041537 WO2001037435A2 (en) | 1999-10-25 | 2000-10-25 | Super directional beamforming design and implementation |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
CA2387797A1 true CA2387797A1 (en) | 2001-05-25 |
Family
ID=23694761
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
CA002387797A Abandoned CA2387797A1 (en) | 1999-10-25 | 2000-10-25 | Super directional beamforming design and implementation |
Country Status (7)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (1) | US6594367B1 (en) |
EP (1) | EP1224837A4 (en) |
JP (1) | JP2003514481A (en) |
CA (1) | CA2387797A1 (en) |
HK (1) | HK1047674A1 (en) |
IL (1) | IL149278A0 (en) |
WO (1) | WO2001037435A2 (en) |
Families Citing this family (79)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US7046812B1 (en) * | 2000-05-23 | 2006-05-16 | Lucent Technologies Inc. | Acoustic beam forming with robust signal estimation |
US20020031234A1 (en) * | 2000-06-28 | 2002-03-14 | Wenger Matthew P. | Microphone system for in-car audio pickup |
EP1184676B1 (en) * | 2000-09-02 | 2004-05-06 | Nokia Corporation | System and method for processing a signal being emitted from a target signal source into a noisy environment |
US6885338B2 (en) * | 2000-12-29 | 2005-04-26 | Lockheed Martin Corporation | Adaptive digital beamformer coefficient processor for satellite signal interference reduction |
US7206418B2 (en) * | 2001-02-12 | 2007-04-17 | Fortemedia, Inc. | Noise suppression for a wireless communication device |
DE10110258C1 (en) * | 2001-03-02 | 2002-08-29 | Siemens Audiologische Technik | Method for operating a hearing aid or hearing aid system and hearing aid or hearing aid system |
US20020131580A1 (en) * | 2001-03-16 | 2002-09-19 | Shure Incorporated | Solid angle cross-talk cancellation for beamforming arrays |
US7398209B2 (en) * | 2002-06-03 | 2008-07-08 | Voicebox Technologies, Inc. | Systems and methods for responding to natural language speech utterance |
US7218741B2 (en) * | 2002-06-05 | 2007-05-15 | Siemens Medical Solutions Usa, Inc | System and method for adaptive multi-sensor arrays |
US7693720B2 (en) | 2002-07-15 | 2010-04-06 | Voicebox Technologies, Inc. | Mobile systems and methods for responding to natural language speech utterance |
EP1592282B1 (en) * | 2003-02-07 | 2007-06-13 | Nippon Telegraph and Telephone Corporation | Teleconferencing method and system |
US7269452B2 (en) * | 2003-04-15 | 2007-09-11 | Ipventure, Inc. | Directional wireless communication systems |
US8849185B2 (en) | 2003-04-15 | 2014-09-30 | Ipventure, Inc. | Hybrid audio delivery system and method therefor |
EP1473964A3 (en) * | 2003-05-02 | 2006-08-09 | Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. | Microphone array, method to process signals from this microphone array and speech recognition method and system using the same |
US7864157B1 (en) * | 2003-06-27 | 2011-01-04 | Cypress Semiconductor Corporation | Method and apparatus for sensing movement of a human interface device |
EP1524879B1 (en) * | 2003-06-30 | 2014-05-07 | Nuance Communications, Inc. | Handsfree system for use in a vehicle |
US20050135632A1 (en) * | 2003-12-17 | 2005-06-23 | Metravib R.D.S. | Method and apparatus for detecting and locating noise sources not correlated |
US7415117B2 (en) | 2004-03-02 | 2008-08-19 | Microsoft Corporation | System and method for beamforming using a microphone array |
GB0405455D0 (en) * | 2004-03-11 | 2004-04-21 | Mitel Networks Corp | High precision beamsteerer based on fixed beamforming approach beampatterns |
US7574008B2 (en) * | 2004-09-17 | 2009-08-11 | Microsoft Corporation | Method and apparatus for multi-sensory speech enhancement |
US8543390B2 (en) * | 2004-10-26 | 2013-09-24 | Qnx Software Systems Limited | Multi-channel periodic signal enhancement system |
US20070116300A1 (en) * | 2004-12-22 | 2007-05-24 | Broadcom Corporation | Channel decoding for wireless telephones with multiple microphones and multiple description transmission |
US20060147063A1 (en) * | 2004-12-22 | 2006-07-06 | Broadcom Corporation | Echo cancellation in telephones with multiple microphones |
US7983720B2 (en) * | 2004-12-22 | 2011-07-19 | Broadcom Corporation | Wireless telephone with adaptive microphone array |
US20060133621A1 (en) * | 2004-12-22 | 2006-06-22 | Broadcom Corporation | Wireless telephone having multiple microphones |
US8509703B2 (en) * | 2004-12-22 | 2013-08-13 | Broadcom Corporation | Wireless telephone with multiple microphones and multiple description transmission |
WO2006131959A1 (en) * | 2005-06-06 | 2006-12-14 | Saga University | Signal separating apparatus |
US7640160B2 (en) | 2005-08-05 | 2009-12-29 | Voicebox Technologies, Inc. | Systems and methods for responding to natural language speech utterance |
US7620549B2 (en) | 2005-08-10 | 2009-11-17 | Voicebox Technologies, Inc. | System and method of supporting adaptive misrecognition in conversational speech |
US7949529B2 (en) | 2005-08-29 | 2011-05-24 | Voicebox Technologies, Inc. | Mobile systems and methods of supporting natural language human-machine interactions |
US7634409B2 (en) * | 2005-08-31 | 2009-12-15 | Voicebox Technologies, Inc. | Dynamic speech sharpening |
WO2007103037A2 (en) * | 2006-03-01 | 2007-09-13 | Softmax, Inc. | System and method for generating a separated signal |
US8073681B2 (en) | 2006-10-16 | 2011-12-06 | Voicebox Technologies, Inc. | System and method for a cooperative conversational voice user interface |
US7818176B2 (en) | 2007-02-06 | 2010-10-19 | Voicebox Technologies, Inc. | System and method for selecting and presenting advertisements based on natural language processing of voice-based input |
US8160273B2 (en) * | 2007-02-26 | 2012-04-17 | Erik Visser | Systems, methods, and apparatus for signal separation using data driven techniques |
KR20090123921A (en) * | 2007-02-26 | 2009-12-02 | 퀄컴 인코포레이티드 | Systems, methods, and apparatus for signal separation |
US7626889B2 (en) * | 2007-04-06 | 2009-12-01 | Microsoft Corporation | Sensor array post-filter for tracking spatial distributions of signals and noise |
EE05618B1 (en) * | 2007-04-17 | 2012-12-17 | Tallinna Tehnikaülikool | Method for Data Integrity Based on Intersection of Sine Signal Intersections |
US8428661B2 (en) * | 2007-10-30 | 2013-04-23 | Broadcom Corporation | Speech intelligibility in telephones with multiple microphones |
US8140335B2 (en) | 2007-12-11 | 2012-03-20 | Voicebox Technologies, Inc. | System and method for providing a natural language voice user interface in an integrated voice navigation services environment |
US8175291B2 (en) * | 2007-12-19 | 2012-05-08 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Systems, methods, and apparatus for multi-microphone based speech enhancement |
US8812309B2 (en) * | 2008-03-18 | 2014-08-19 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Methods and apparatus for suppressing ambient noise using multiple audio signals |
US8184816B2 (en) * | 2008-03-18 | 2012-05-22 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Systems and methods for detecting wind noise using multiple audio sources |
US8818000B2 (en) | 2008-04-25 | 2014-08-26 | Andrea Electronics Corporation | System, device, and method utilizing an integrated stereo array microphone |
US8589161B2 (en) | 2008-05-27 | 2013-11-19 | Voicebox Technologies, Inc. | System and method for an integrated, multi-modal, multi-device natural language voice services environment |
US9305548B2 (en) | 2008-05-27 | 2016-04-05 | Voicebox Technologies Corporation | System and method for an integrated, multi-modal, multi-device natural language voice services environment |
US8321214B2 (en) * | 2008-06-02 | 2012-11-27 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Systems, methods, and apparatus for multichannel signal amplitude balancing |
US8503694B2 (en) * | 2008-06-24 | 2013-08-06 | Microsoft Corporation | Sound capture system for devices with two microphones |
US20090323973A1 (en) * | 2008-06-25 | 2009-12-31 | Microsoft Corporation | Selecting an audio device for use |
US8326637B2 (en) | 2009-02-20 | 2012-12-04 | Voicebox Technologies, Inc. | System and method for processing multi-modal device interactions in a natural language voice services environment |
US9171541B2 (en) | 2009-11-10 | 2015-10-27 | Voicebox Technologies Corporation | System and method for hybrid processing in a natural language voice services environment |
WO2011059997A1 (en) | 2009-11-10 | 2011-05-19 | Voicebox Technologies, Inc. | System and method for providing a natural language content dedication service |
WO2011063857A1 (en) | 2009-11-30 | 2011-06-03 | Nokia Corporation | An apparatus |
US8473287B2 (en) | 2010-04-19 | 2013-06-25 | Audience, Inc. | Method for jointly optimizing noise reduction and voice quality in a mono or multi-microphone system |
US8958572B1 (en) * | 2010-04-19 | 2015-02-17 | Audience, Inc. | Adaptive noise cancellation for multi-microphone systems |
US8538035B2 (en) | 2010-04-29 | 2013-09-17 | Audience, Inc. | Multi-microphone robust noise suppression |
US8781137B1 (en) | 2010-04-27 | 2014-07-15 | Audience, Inc. | Wind noise detection and suppression |
US8447596B2 (en) | 2010-07-12 | 2013-05-21 | Audience, Inc. | Monaural noise suppression based on computational auditory scene analysis |
US20130259253A1 (en) * | 2012-03-29 | 2013-10-03 | Rogerio Guedes Alves | Controllers for active noise control systems |
US9143858B2 (en) | 2012-03-29 | 2015-09-22 | Csr Technology Inc. | User designed active noise cancellation (ANC) controller for headphones |
US8935164B2 (en) * | 2012-05-02 | 2015-01-13 | Gentex Corporation | Non-spatial speech detection system and method of using same |
JP6039305B2 (en) * | 2012-08-23 | 2016-12-07 | キヤノン株式会社 | Subject information acquisition apparatus, information processing apparatus, and subject information acquisition method |
US9076450B1 (en) * | 2012-09-21 | 2015-07-07 | Amazon Technologies, Inc. | Directed audio for speech recognition |
US9831898B2 (en) * | 2013-03-13 | 2017-11-28 | Analog Devices Global | Radio frequency transmitter noise cancellation |
US20140269198A1 (en) * | 2013-03-15 | 2014-09-18 | The Trustees Of Dartmouth College | Beamforming Sensor Nodes And Associated Systems |
CN104065798B (en) * | 2013-03-21 | 2016-08-03 | 华为技术有限公司 | Audio signal processing method and equipment |
US20180317019A1 (en) | 2013-05-23 | 2018-11-01 | Knowles Electronics, Llc | Acoustic activity detecting microphone |
US9288577B2 (en) * | 2013-07-29 | 2016-03-15 | Lenovo (Singapore) Pte. Ltd. | Preserving phase shift in spatial filtering |
DE102015203600B4 (en) * | 2014-08-22 | 2021-10-21 | Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft zur Förderung der angewandten Forschung e.V. | FIR filter coefficient calculation for beamforming filters |
US9898459B2 (en) | 2014-09-16 | 2018-02-20 | Voicebox Technologies Corporation | Integration of domain information into state transitions of a finite state transducer for natural language processing |
CN107003996A (en) | 2014-09-16 | 2017-08-01 | 声钰科技 | VCommerce |
CN107003999B (en) | 2014-10-15 | 2020-08-21 | 声钰科技 | System and method for subsequent response to a user's prior natural language input |
US10431214B2 (en) | 2014-11-26 | 2019-10-01 | Voicebox Technologies Corporation | System and method of determining a domain and/or an action related to a natural language input |
US10614799B2 (en) | 2014-11-26 | 2020-04-07 | Voicebox Technologies Corporation | System and method of providing intent predictions for an utterance prior to a system detection of an end of the utterance |
WO2016112113A1 (en) | 2015-01-07 | 2016-07-14 | Knowles Electronics, Llc | Utilizing digital microphones for low power keyword detection and noise suppression |
WO2018023106A1 (en) | 2016-07-29 | 2018-02-01 | Erik SWART | System and method of disambiguating natural language processing requests |
US10192566B1 (en) | 2018-01-17 | 2019-01-29 | Sorenson Ip Holdings, Llc | Noise reduction in an audio system |
US10586538B2 (en) | 2018-04-25 | 2020-03-10 | Comcast Cable Comminications, LLC | Microphone array beamforming control |
CN115088207B (en) * | 2020-02-29 | 2023-03-31 | 华为技术有限公司 | Method and device for determining filter coefficient |
Family Cites Families (265)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US2379514A (en) | 1942-09-30 | 1945-07-03 | Charles B Fisher | Microphone |
US2972018A (en) | 1953-11-30 | 1961-02-14 | Rca Corp | Noise reduction system |
US3098121A (en) | 1958-09-15 | 1963-07-16 | Clark Co Inc David | Automatic sound control |
USRE26174E (en) | 1961-12-05 | 1967-03-21 | Leale hearing aid | |
US3101744A (en) | 1962-02-26 | 1963-08-27 | Lord Mfg Co | Wave guide damped against mechanical vibration by exterior viscoelastic and rigid lamination |
US3247925A (en) | 1962-03-08 | 1966-04-26 | Lord Corp | Loudspeaker |
US3394226A (en) | 1963-08-19 | 1968-07-23 | Daniel E. Andrews Jr. | Special purpose hearing aid |
DE1250202B (en) | 1964-08-21 | 1967-09-14 | Lord Corporation Erie, Pa (V St A) | Device for damping the bending vibrations of a surface |
US3298457A (en) | 1964-12-21 | 1967-01-17 | Lord Corp | Acoustical barrier treatment |
US3330376A (en) | 1965-06-11 | 1967-07-11 | Lord Corp | Structure acoustically transparent for compressional waves and acoustically damped for bending or flexural waves |
US3422921A (en) | 1966-04-25 | 1969-01-21 | Lord Corp | Sound attenuating wall for blocking transmission of intelligible speech |
GB1160431A (en) | 1966-05-04 | 1969-08-06 | Mini Of Technology London | Ear Defenders. |
US3416782A (en) | 1966-07-25 | 1968-12-17 | Lord Corp | Mounting |
US3562089A (en) | 1967-11-01 | 1971-02-09 | Lord Corp | Damped laminate |
GB1289993A (en) | 1969-08-07 | 1972-09-20 | ||
US3702644A (en) | 1971-09-10 | 1972-11-14 | Vibration & Noise Eng Corp | Blow down quieter |
US3890474A (en) | 1972-05-17 | 1975-06-17 | Raymond C Glicksberg | Sound amplitude limiters |
GB1378294A (en) | 1972-11-06 | 1974-12-27 | Cosmocord Ltd | Separable ear defender |
US3830988A (en) | 1972-12-21 | 1974-08-20 | Roanwell Corp | Noise canceling transmitter |
US3889059A (en) | 1973-03-26 | 1975-06-10 | Northern Electric Co | Loudspeaking communication terminal apparatus and method of operation |
JPS5154703A (en) | 1974-11-08 | 1976-05-14 | Oki Electric Ind Co Ltd | |
FR2305909A1 (en) | 1975-03-28 | 1976-10-22 | Dassault Electronique | Microphones and associated equipment - include one unshielded microphone and one masked microphone, and electronics system to minimise noise background |
GB1577322A (en) | 1976-05-13 | 1980-10-22 | Bearcroft R | Active attenuation of recurring vibrations |
DE2640324A1 (en) | 1976-09-08 | 1978-03-09 | Kock | Telephone terminal with loudspeaker output - has two microphones whose outputs are subtracted to eliminate background noise |
US4122303A (en) | 1976-12-10 | 1978-10-24 | Sound Attenuators Limited | Improvements in and relating to active sound attenuation |
CA1116300A (en) | 1977-12-28 | 1982-01-12 | Hiroaki Sakoe | Speech recognition system |
US4169257A (en) | 1978-04-28 | 1979-09-25 | The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Navy | Controlling the directivity of a circular array of acoustic sensors |
US4334740A (en) | 1978-09-12 | 1982-06-15 | Polaroid Corporation | Receiving system having pre-selected directional response |
US4339018A (en) | 1978-10-27 | 1982-07-13 | Lord Corporation | Sound absorbing structure |
US4243117A (en) | 1978-10-27 | 1981-01-06 | Lord Corporation | Sound absorbing structure |
US4261708A (en) | 1979-03-23 | 1981-04-14 | Vibration And Noise Engineering Corporation | Apparatus and method for separating impurities from geothermal steam and the like |
US4241805A (en) | 1979-04-02 | 1980-12-30 | Vibration And Noise Engineering Corporation | High pressure gas vent noise control apparatus and method |
WO1981000638A1 (en) | 1979-08-16 | 1981-03-05 | Sound Attenuators Ltd | A method of reducing the adaption time in the cancellation of repetitive vibration |
WO1981001480A1 (en) | 1979-11-21 | 1981-05-28 | Sound Attenuators Ltd | Improved method and apparatus for cancelling vibration |
JPS56152337A (en) | 1980-04-24 | 1981-11-25 | Victor Co Of Japan Ltd | Noise reduction system |
US4321970A (en) | 1980-08-07 | 1982-03-30 | Thigpen James L | Ripper apparatus |
EP0059745B1 (en) | 1980-09-10 | 1985-12-04 | Gewertec Gesellschaft Für Werkstofftechnik Mbh | Method and device for the localisation and analysis of sound emissions |
US4409435A (en) | 1980-10-03 | 1983-10-11 | Gen Engineering Co., Ltd. | Hearing aid suitable for use under noisy circumstance |
US4473906A (en) | 1980-12-05 | 1984-09-25 | Lord Corporation | Active acoustic attenuator |
FR2502370A1 (en) | 1981-03-18 | 1982-09-24 | Trt Telecom Radio Electr | NOISE REDUCTION DEVICE IN A SPEECH SIGNAL MELEUR OF NOISE |
AU550700B2 (en) | 1981-06-12 | 1986-03-27 | Chaplin Patents Holding Co. Ltd | Method and apparatus for reducing repetitive noise entering the ear |
ZA825676B (en) | 1981-08-11 | 1983-06-29 | Sound Attenuators Ltd | Method and apparatus for low frequency active attennuation |
JPS5868325A (en) | 1981-10-19 | 1983-04-23 | Victor Co Of Japan Ltd | Noise reducing device |
DK153350B (en) | 1981-10-20 | 1988-07-04 | Craigwell Ind Ltd | Hearing aid |
EP0091926B1 (en) | 1981-10-21 | 1987-08-26 | Sound Attenuators Limited | Improved method and apparatus for cancelling vibrations |
ZA828700B (en) | 1981-11-26 | 1983-09-28 | Sound Attenuators Ltd | Method of and apparatus for cancelling vibrations from a source of repetitive vibrations |
US4463222A (en) | 1981-12-23 | 1984-07-31 | Roanwell Corporation | Noise canceling transmitter |
GB2113952B (en) | 1982-01-27 | 1985-07-24 | Racal Acoustics Ltd | Improvements in and relating to communications systems |
WO1983003700A1 (en) | 1982-04-19 | 1983-10-27 | Chaplin, George, Brian, Barrie | Method of and apparatus for active vibration isolation |
US4494074A (en) | 1982-04-28 | 1985-01-15 | Bose Corporation | Feedback control |
US4455675A (en) | 1982-04-28 | 1984-06-19 | Bose Corporation | Headphoning |
US4461025A (en) | 1982-06-22 | 1984-07-17 | Audiological Engineering Corporation | Automatic background noise suppressor |
US4453600A (en) | 1982-08-02 | 1984-06-12 | Thigpen James L | Signal shank parallel ripper apparatus |
JPS5939198A (en) | 1982-08-27 | 1984-03-03 | Victor Co Of Japan Ltd | Microphone device |
US4570155A (en) | 1982-09-27 | 1986-02-11 | Gateway Scientific, Inc. | Smoke alarm activated light |
US4477505A (en) | 1982-12-13 | 1984-10-16 | Lord Corporation | Structure for absorbing acoustic and other wave energy |
US4562589A (en) | 1982-12-15 | 1985-12-31 | Lord Corporation | Active attenuation of noise in a closed structure |
US4495643A (en) | 1983-03-31 | 1985-01-22 | Orban Associates, Inc. | Audio peak limiter using Hilbert transforms |
US4718096A (en) | 1983-05-18 | 1988-01-05 | Speech Systems, Inc. | Speech recognition system |
US4539708A (en) | 1983-07-01 | 1985-09-03 | American Technology Corporation | Ear radio |
CA1214112A (en) | 1983-10-12 | 1986-11-18 | William A. Cole | Noise reduction system |
US4581758A (en) | 1983-11-04 | 1986-04-08 | At&T Bell Laboratories | Acoustic direction identification system |
AT379274B (en) | 1983-12-22 | 1985-12-10 | Akg Akustische Kino Geraete | ARRANGEMENT FOR SUPPRESSING THE AMPLITUDE PEAKS AT THE BEGINNING OF EXPLOSIVE LIGHTS IN AN ELECTROACOUSTIC TRANSMISSION SYSTEM WHICH THE INPUT IS A MICROPHONE |
US4530304A (en) | 1984-03-08 | 1985-07-23 | Biomatics Inc. | Magnetic lifting device for a cellular sample treatment apparatus |
US4649505A (en) | 1984-07-02 | 1987-03-10 | General Electric Company | Two-input crosstalk-resistant adaptive noise canceller |
US4696043A (en) | 1984-08-24 | 1987-09-22 | Victor Company Of Japan, Ltd. | Microphone apparatus having a variable directivity pattern |
US4791672A (en) | 1984-10-05 | 1988-12-13 | Audiotone, Inc. | Wearable digital hearing aid and method for improving hearing ability |
USRE34236E (en) | 1984-10-10 | 1993-04-27 | Noise Cancellation Technologies, Inc. | Frequency attenuation compensated pneumatic headphone and liquid tube audio system for medical use |
US4589137A (en) | 1985-01-03 | 1986-05-13 | The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Navy | Electronic noise-reducing system |
US4783798A (en) | 1985-03-14 | 1988-11-08 | Acs Communications Systems, Inc. | Encrypting transponder |
GB2172769B (en) | 1985-03-21 | 1988-07-06 | Topexpress Ltd | Improvements in acoustic attenuation |
US4653606A (en) | 1985-03-22 | 1987-03-31 | American Telephone And Telegraph Company | Electroacoustic device with broad frequency range directional response |
US4630304A (en) | 1985-07-01 | 1986-12-16 | Motorola, Inc. | Automatic background noise estimator for a noise suppression system |
US4628529A (en) | 1985-07-01 | 1986-12-09 | Motorola, Inc. | Noise suppression system |
US4630302A (en) | 1985-08-02 | 1986-12-16 | Acousis Company | Hearing aid method and apparatus |
US4636586A (en) | 1985-09-20 | 1987-01-13 | Rca Corporation | Speakerphone with adaptive cancellation of room echoes |
CA1236607A (en) | 1985-09-23 | 1988-05-10 | Northern Telecom Limited | Microphone arrangement |
US4683010A (en) | 1985-10-01 | 1987-07-28 | Acs Industries, Inc. | Compacted wire seal and method of forming same |
US4658426A (en) | 1985-10-10 | 1987-04-14 | Harold Antin | Adaptive noise suppressor |
US4783818A (en) | 1985-10-17 | 1988-11-08 | Intellitech Inc. | Method of and means for adaptively filtering screeching noise caused by acoustic feedback |
CA1293693C (en) | 1985-10-30 | 1991-12-31 | Tetsu Taguchi | Noise canceling apparatus |
US4653102A (en) | 1985-11-05 | 1987-03-24 | Position Orientation Systems | Directional microphone system |
US4736432A (en) | 1985-12-09 | 1988-04-05 | Motorola Inc. | Electronic siren audio notch filter for transmitters |
JPS62164400A (en) | 1986-01-14 | 1987-07-21 | Hitachi Plant Eng & Constr Co Ltd | Electronic silencer system |
ES2019628B3 (en) | 1986-02-15 | 1991-07-01 | Smiths Ind Public Ltd Company | SPOKEN TEXT PROCESSOR AND METHOD .. |
FR2595498B1 (en) | 1986-03-07 | 1989-06-02 | Centre Nat Rech Scient | METHODS AND DEVICES FOR MITIGATING EXTERNAL NOISE ARISING AT TYMPAN AND IMPROVING THE INTELLIGIBILITY OF ELECTROACOUSTIC COMMUNICATIONS |
US4750207A (en) | 1986-03-31 | 1988-06-07 | Siemens Hearing Instruments, Inc. | Hearing aid noise suppression system |
GB8615315D0 (en) | 1986-06-23 | 1986-07-30 | Secr Defence | Aircraft cabin noise control apparatus |
US4731850A (en) | 1986-06-26 | 1988-03-15 | Audimax, Inc. | Programmable digital hearing aid system |
US4741038A (en) | 1986-09-26 | 1988-04-26 | American Telephone And Telegraph Company, At&T Bell Laboratories | Sound location arrangement |
FR2604551B1 (en) | 1986-09-26 | 1988-12-30 | Saint Louis Inst | NOISE PROTECTION DEVICE |
JPH0683305B2 (en) | 1987-03-12 | 1994-10-19 | 日本電気株式会社 | Loud phone |
US4802227A (en) | 1987-04-03 | 1989-01-31 | American Telephone And Telegraph Company | Noise reduction processing arrangement for microphone arrays |
US4771472A (en) | 1987-04-14 | 1988-09-13 | Hughes Aircraft Company | Method and apparatus for improving voice intelligibility in high noise environments |
FR2614427B1 (en) | 1987-04-24 | 1989-06-09 | Thomson Csf | PASSIVE SOUND TELEMETRY PROCESS |
US5075694A (en) | 1987-05-18 | 1991-12-24 | Avion Systems, Inc. | Airborne surveillance method and system |
CA1291837C (en) | 1987-07-15 | 1991-11-05 | Juro Ohga | Electronic telephone terminal having noise suppression function |
US4811404A (en) | 1987-10-01 | 1989-03-07 | Motorola, Inc. | Noise suppression system |
US4837832A (en) | 1987-10-20 | 1989-06-06 | Sol Fanshel | Electronic hearing aid with gain control means for eliminating low frequency noise |
JPH01118900A (en) | 1987-11-01 | 1989-05-11 | Ricoh Co Ltd | Noise suppressor |
US4847897A (en) | 1987-12-11 | 1989-07-11 | American Telephone And Telegraph Company | Adaptive expander for telephones |
IL84902A (en) | 1987-12-21 | 1991-12-15 | D S P Group Israel Ltd | Digital autocorrelation system for detecting speech in noisy audio signal |
US5097923A (en) | 1988-02-19 | 1992-03-24 | Noise Cancellation Technologies, Inc. | Active sound attenation system for engine exhaust systems and the like |
US4862506A (en) | 1988-02-24 | 1989-08-29 | Noise Cancellation Technologies, Inc. | Monitoring, testing and operator controlling of active noise and vibration cancellation systems |
JP2745535B2 (en) | 1988-05-24 | 1998-04-28 | 日本電気株式会社 | Voice recognition device |
US5046103A (en) | 1988-06-07 | 1991-09-03 | Applied Acoustic Research, Inc. | Noise reducing system for voice microphones |
US4977600A (en) | 1988-06-07 | 1990-12-11 | Noise Cancellation Technologies, Inc. | Sound attenuation system for personal seat |
US4985925A (en) | 1988-06-24 | 1991-01-15 | Sensor Electronics, Inc. | Active noise reduction system |
GB2222053B (en) | 1988-08-17 | 1993-03-31 | Topexpress Ltd | Signal processing means for sensing a periodic signal in the presence of another interfering periodic noise |
US4878188A (en) | 1988-08-30 | 1989-10-31 | Noise Cancellation Tech | Selective active cancellation system for repetitive phenomena |
JP2598483B2 (en) | 1988-09-05 | 1997-04-09 | 日立プラント建設株式会社 | Electronic silencing system |
DE68916356T2 (en) | 1988-09-30 | 1994-10-13 | Toshiba Kawasaki Kk | Noise suppressor. |
US4910718A (en) | 1988-10-05 | 1990-03-20 | Grumman Aerospace Corporation | Method and apparatus for acoustic emission monitoring |
US4930156A (en) | 1988-11-18 | 1990-05-29 | Norcom Electronics Corporation | Telephone receiver transmitter device |
US5125032A (en) | 1988-12-02 | 1992-06-23 | Erwin Meister | Talk/listen headset |
AU634510B2 (en) | 1989-01-26 | 1993-02-25 | Plantronics, Inc. | Voice communication link interface apparatus |
US5086385A (en) | 1989-01-31 | 1992-02-04 | Custom Command Systems | Expandable home automation system |
US5091954A (en) | 1989-03-01 | 1992-02-25 | Sony Corporation | Noise reducing receiver device |
US5070527A (en) | 1989-03-02 | 1991-12-03 | Acs Communications, Inc. | Time dependant, variable amplitude threshold output circuit for frequency variant and frequency invarient signal discrimination |
US4928307A (en) | 1989-03-02 | 1990-05-22 | Acs Communications | Time dependent, variable amplitude threshold output circuit for frequency variant and frequency invariant signal discrimination |
US5208864A (en) | 1989-03-10 | 1993-05-04 | Nippon Telegraph & Telephone Corporation | Method of detecting acoustic signal |
US5348124A (en) | 1989-03-16 | 1994-09-20 | Active Noise And Vibration Technologies, Inc. | Active control of vibration |
US5209326A (en) | 1989-03-16 | 1993-05-11 | Active Noise And Vibration Technologies Inc. | Active vibration control |
US4965834A (en) | 1989-03-20 | 1990-10-23 | The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Navy | Multi-stage noise-reducing system |
US5138664A (en) | 1989-03-25 | 1992-08-11 | Sony Corporation | Noise reducing device |
US5212764A (en) | 1989-04-19 | 1993-05-18 | Ricoh Company, Ltd. | Noise eliminating apparatus and speech recognition apparatus using the same |
US4956867A (en) | 1989-04-20 | 1990-09-11 | Massachusetts Institute Of Technology | Adaptive beamforming for noise reduction |
US4963071A (en) | 1989-06-23 | 1990-10-16 | American Coupler Systems, Inc. | Coupler assembly between a prime mover and a work implement |
DE3925589C2 (en) | 1989-08-02 | 1994-03-17 | Blaupunkt Werke Gmbh | Method and arrangement for the elimination of interference from speech signals |
US5134659A (en) | 1990-07-10 | 1992-07-28 | Mnc, Inc. | Method and apparatus for performing noise cancelling and headphoning |
US5117461A (en) | 1989-08-10 | 1992-05-26 | Mnc, Inc. | Electroacoustic device for hearing needs including noise cancellation |
US5138663A (en) | 1989-08-10 | 1992-08-11 | Mnc, Inc. | Method and apparatus for performing noise cancelling and headphoning |
US5001763A (en) | 1989-08-10 | 1991-03-19 | Mnc Inc. | Electroacoustic device for hearing needs including noise cancellation |
US4951954A (en) | 1989-08-23 | 1990-08-28 | Acs Industries, Inc. | High temperature low friction seal |
US5313945A (en) | 1989-09-18 | 1994-05-24 | Noise Cancellation Technologies, Inc. | Active attenuation system for medical patients |
US4991433A (en) | 1989-09-21 | 1991-02-12 | Applied Acoustic Research | Phase track system for monitoring fluid material within a container |
US5126681A (en) | 1989-10-16 | 1992-06-30 | Noise Cancellation Technologies, Inc. | In-wire selective active cancellation system |
GB2239971B (en) | 1989-12-06 | 1993-09-29 | Ca Nat Research Council | System for separating speech from background noise |
US5121426A (en) | 1989-12-22 | 1992-06-09 | At&T Bell Laboratories | Loudspeaking telephone station including directional microphone |
JPH03205587A (en) | 1990-01-06 | 1991-09-09 | Yuuseishiyou Tsushin Sogo Kenkyusho | Determining method for generation area by mutual correlation of volcanic slight tremor |
US5276740A (en) | 1990-01-19 | 1994-01-04 | Sony Corporation | Earphone device |
US5010576A (en) | 1990-01-22 | 1991-04-23 | Westinghouse Electric Corp. | Active acoustic attenuation system for reducing tonal noise in rotating equipment |
US5105377A (en) | 1990-02-09 | 1992-04-14 | Noise Cancellation Technologies, Inc. | Digital virtual earth active cancellation system |
US5052510A (en) | 1990-02-16 | 1991-10-01 | Noise Cancellation Technologies, Inc. | Hybrid type vibration isolation apparatus |
GB9003959D0 (en) | 1990-02-21 | 1990-04-18 | Ross Colin F | Active control of internal combustion engine performance |
DE4008595A1 (en) | 1990-03-17 | 1991-09-19 | Georg Ziegelbauer | Microphone for close speech avoiding background noise - has two sound receivers at slight manual spacing in range of their sensitive surfaces |
WO1994025957A1 (en) | 1990-04-05 | 1994-11-10 | Intelex, Inc., Dba Race Link Communications Systems, Inc. | Voice transmission system and method for high ambient noise conditions |
US5023002A (en) | 1990-04-09 | 1991-06-11 | Acs Industries, Inc. | Method and apparatus for recovering oil from an oil spill on the surface of a body of water |
US5272286A (en) | 1990-04-09 | 1993-12-21 | Active Noise And Vibration Technologies, Inc. | Single cavity automobile muffler |
US5133017A (en) | 1990-04-09 | 1992-07-21 | Active Noise And Vibration Technologies, Inc. | Noise suppression system |
US5457749A (en) | 1990-04-09 | 1995-10-10 | Noise Cancellation Technologies, Inc. | Electronic muffler |
US5423523A (en) | 1990-04-09 | 1995-06-13 | Noise Cancellation Technologies, Inc. | Integrated hydraulic mount for active vibration control system |
GB9015984D0 (en) | 1990-07-20 | 1990-09-05 | Anvt Europ Limited | Hydraulic lever actuator |
CA2054606C (en) | 1990-11-01 | 1994-06-28 | Akihiko Sugiyama | Tap-weight adaptation control using stepsize inversely variable with signal power level |
JPH04182700A (en) | 1990-11-19 | 1992-06-30 | Nec Corp | Voice recognizer |
JP2974423B2 (en) | 1991-02-13 | 1999-11-10 | シャープ株式会社 | Lombard Speech Recognition Method |
US5241692A (en) | 1991-02-19 | 1993-08-31 | Motorola, Inc. | Interference reduction system for a speech recognition device |
US5511127A (en) | 1991-04-05 | 1996-04-23 | Applied Acoustic Research | Active noise control |
GB9107416D0 (en) | 1991-04-09 | 1991-05-22 | Active Noise & Vibration Tech | Active noise reduction |
EP0509742B1 (en) | 1991-04-18 | 1997-08-27 | Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. | Microphone apparatus |
GB9116433D0 (en) | 1991-07-30 | 1991-09-11 | Active Noise & Vibration Tech | Noise reduction system |
US5619020A (en) | 1991-08-29 | 1997-04-08 | Noise Cancellation Technologies, Inc. | Muffler |
US5550334A (en) | 1991-10-30 | 1996-08-27 | Noise Cancellation Technologies, Inc. | Actively sound reduced muffler having a venturi effect configuration |
US5260997A (en) | 1991-10-31 | 1993-11-09 | Acs Communications, Inc. | Articulated headset |
US5546090A (en) | 1991-12-12 | 1996-08-13 | Arraycomm, Inc. | Method and apparatus for calibrating antenna arrays |
US5515378A (en) | 1991-12-12 | 1996-05-07 | Arraycomm, Inc. | Spatial division multiple access wireless communication systems |
US5592490A (en) | 1991-12-12 | 1997-01-07 | Arraycomm, Inc. | Spectrally efficient high capacity wireless communication systems |
US5625880A (en) | 1991-12-12 | 1997-04-29 | Arraycomm, Incorporated | Spectrally efficient and high capacity acknowledgement radio paging system |
US5219037A (en) | 1992-01-21 | 1993-06-15 | General Motors Corporation | Component mount assembly providing active control of vehicle vibration |
US5353347A (en) | 1992-02-04 | 1994-10-04 | Acs Communications, Inc. | Telephone headset amplifier with battery saver, receive line noise reduction, and click-free mute switching |
US5412735A (en) | 1992-02-27 | 1995-05-02 | Central Institute For The Deaf | Adaptive noise reduction circuit for a sound reproduction system |
US5226077A (en) | 1992-03-02 | 1993-07-06 | Acs Communications, Inc. | Headset amplifier with automatic log on/log off detection |
US5353376A (en) | 1992-03-20 | 1994-10-04 | Texas Instruments Incorporated | System and method for improved speech acquisition for hands-free voice telecommunication in a noisy environment |
US5621656A (en) | 1992-04-15 | 1997-04-15 | Noise Cancellation Technologies, Inc. | Adaptive resonator vibration control system |
US5699436A (en) | 1992-04-30 | 1997-12-16 | Noise Cancellation Technologies, Inc. | Hands free noise canceling headset |
JPH05316587A (en) | 1992-05-08 | 1993-11-26 | Sony Corp | Microphone device |
US5251263A (en) | 1992-05-22 | 1993-10-05 | Andrea Electronics Corporation | Adaptive noise cancellation and speech enhancement system and apparatus therefor |
JP3176474B2 (en) | 1992-06-03 | 2001-06-18 | 沖電気工業株式会社 | Adaptive noise canceller device |
US5524057A (en) | 1992-06-19 | 1996-06-04 | Alpine Electronics Inc. | Noise-canceling apparatus |
US5469087A (en) | 1992-06-25 | 1995-11-21 | Noise Cancellation Technologies, Inc. | Control system using harmonic filters |
US5638022A (en) | 1992-06-25 | 1997-06-10 | Noise Cancellation Technologies, Inc. | Control system for periodic disturbances |
USD344730S (en) | 1992-07-08 | 1994-03-01 | Acs Communications, Inc. | Communications headset |
US5563817A (en) | 1992-07-14 | 1996-10-08 | Noise Cancellation Technologies, Inc. | Adaptive canceller filter module |
US5627746A (en) | 1992-07-14 | 1997-05-06 | Noise Cancellation Technologies, Inc. | Low cost controller |
US5315661A (en) | 1992-08-12 | 1994-05-24 | Noise Cancellation Technologies, Inc. | Active high transmission loss panel |
US5251863A (en) | 1992-08-12 | 1993-10-12 | Noise Cancellation Technologies, Inc. | Active force cancellation system |
JP3097340B2 (en) | 1992-08-19 | 2000-10-10 | ソニー株式会社 | Headphone equipment |
US5311453A (en) | 1992-09-11 | 1994-05-10 | Noise Cancellation Technologies, Inc. | Variable point sampling |
JPH06104970A (en) | 1992-09-18 | 1994-04-15 | Fujitsu Ltd | Loudspeaking telephone set |
US5652770A (en) | 1992-09-21 | 1997-07-29 | Noise Cancellation Technologies, Inc. | Sampled-data filter with low delay |
US5692054A (en) | 1992-10-08 | 1997-11-25 | Noise Cancellation Technologies, Inc. | Multiple source self noise cancellation |
US5692053A (en) | 1992-10-08 | 1997-11-25 | Noise Cancellation Technologies, Inc. | Active acoustic transmission loss box |
US5448637A (en) | 1992-10-20 | 1995-09-05 | Pan Communications, Inc. | Two-way communications earset |
US5732143A (en) | 1992-10-29 | 1998-03-24 | Andrea Electronics Corp. | Noise cancellation apparatus |
US5381473A (en) | 1992-10-29 | 1995-01-10 | Andrea Electronics Corporation | Noise cancellation apparatus |
US5715321A (en) | 1992-10-29 | 1998-02-03 | Andrea Electronics Coporation | Noise cancellation headset for use with stand or worn on ear |
US5673325A (en) | 1992-10-29 | 1997-09-30 | Andrea Electronics Corporation | Noise cancellation apparatus |
US5335011A (en) | 1993-01-12 | 1994-08-02 | Bell Communications Research, Inc. | Sound localization system for teleconferencing using self-steering microphone arrays |
US5502869A (en) | 1993-02-09 | 1996-04-02 | Noise Cancellation Technologies, Inc. | High volume, high performance, ultra quiet vacuum cleaner |
US5553153A (en) | 1993-02-10 | 1996-09-03 | Noise Cancellation Technologies, Inc. | Method and system for on-line system identification |
US5416847A (en) | 1993-02-12 | 1995-05-16 | The Walt Disney Company | Multi-band, digital audio noise filter |
US5432859A (en) | 1993-02-23 | 1995-07-11 | Novatel Communications Ltd. | Noise-reduction system |
AU6443994A (en) | 1993-03-08 | 1994-09-26 | Noise Cancellation Technologies, Inc. | Methods and apparatus for closed-loop control of magnetic bearings |
US5748749A (en) | 1993-03-24 | 1998-05-05 | Noise Cancellation Technologies, Inc. | Active noise cancelling muffler |
US5481615A (en) | 1993-04-01 | 1996-01-02 | Noise Cancellation Technologies, Inc. | Audio reproduction system |
US5361303A (en) | 1993-04-01 | 1994-11-01 | Noise Cancellation Technologies, Inc. | Frequency domain adaptive control system |
DE69422033T2 (en) | 1993-04-07 | 2000-06-08 | Noise Cancellation Tech | HYBRID ANALOG / DIGITAL VIBRATION SUPPRESSION SYSTEM |
US5524056A (en) | 1993-04-13 | 1996-06-04 | Etymotic Research, Inc. | Hearing aid having plural microphones and a microphone switching system |
US5416845A (en) | 1993-04-27 | 1995-05-16 | Noise Cancellation Technologies, Inc. | Single and multiple channel block adaptive methods and apparatus for active sound and vibration control |
US5473214A (en) | 1993-05-07 | 1995-12-05 | Noise Cancellation Technologies, Inc. | Low voltage bender piezo-actuators |
US5526432A (en) | 1993-05-21 | 1996-06-11 | Noise Cancellation Technologies, Inc. | Ducted axial fan |
US5414775A (en) | 1993-05-26 | 1995-05-09 | Noise Cancellation Technologies, Inc. | Noise attenuation system for vibratory feeder bowl |
US5493615A (en) | 1993-05-26 | 1996-02-20 | Noise Cancellation Technologies | Piezoelectric driven flow modulator |
US5812682A (en) | 1993-06-11 | 1998-09-22 | Noise Cancellation Technologies, Inc. | Active vibration control system with multiple inputs |
US5452361A (en) | 1993-06-22 | 1995-09-19 | Noise Cancellation Technologies, Inc. | Reduced VLF overload susceptibility active noise cancellation headset |
US5375174A (en) | 1993-07-28 | 1994-12-20 | Noise Cancellation Technologies, Inc. | Remote siren headset |
US5657393A (en) | 1993-07-30 | 1997-08-12 | Crow; Robert P. | Beamed linear array microphone system |
US5381481A (en) | 1993-08-04 | 1995-01-10 | Scientific-Atlanta, Inc. | Method and apparatus for uniquely encrypting a plurality of services at a transmission site |
WO1995005136A1 (en) | 1993-08-12 | 1995-02-23 | Noise Cancellation Technologies, Inc. | Active foam for noise and vibration control |
ATE208944T1 (en) | 1993-09-09 | 2001-11-15 | Nct Group Inc | GLOBAL CALMING ARRANGEMENT FOR STATIONARY INDUCTION DEVICES |
US5440642A (en) | 1993-09-20 | 1995-08-08 | Denenberg; Jeffrey N. | Analog noise cancellation system using digital optimizing of variable parameters |
US5418857A (en) | 1993-09-28 | 1995-05-23 | Noise Cancellation Technologies, Inc. | Active control system for noise shaping |
US5664021A (en) | 1993-10-05 | 1997-09-02 | Picturetel Corporation | Microphone system for teleconferencing system |
US5473701A (en) | 1993-11-05 | 1995-12-05 | At&T Corp. | Adaptive microphone array |
US5689572A (en) | 1993-12-08 | 1997-11-18 | Hitachi, Ltd. | Method of actively controlling noise, and apparatus thereof |
US5485515A (en) | 1993-12-29 | 1996-01-16 | At&T Corp. | Background noise compensation in a telephone network |
US5511128A (en) | 1994-01-21 | 1996-04-23 | Lindemann; Eric | Dynamic intensity beamforming system for noise reduction in a binaural hearing aid |
DE69524062T2 (en) | 1994-01-27 | 2002-05-29 | Nct Group Inc | SEQUENCE FILTER FOR PERIODIC SIGNALS |
US5475761A (en) | 1994-01-31 | 1995-12-12 | Noise Cancellation Technologies, Inc. | Adaptive feedforward and feedback control system |
JP3169199B2 (en) | 1994-02-28 | 2001-05-21 | 本田技研工業株式会社 | How to attach a protective film to the top of the vehicle |
JPH07248778A (en) | 1994-03-09 | 1995-09-26 | Fujitsu Ltd | Method for renewing coefficient of adaptive filter |
US5546467A (en) | 1994-03-14 | 1996-08-13 | Noise Cancellation Technologies, Inc. | Active noise attenuated DSP Unit |
US5581620A (en) | 1994-04-21 | 1996-12-03 | Brown University Research Foundation | Methods and apparatus for adaptive beamforming |
US5604813A (en) | 1994-05-02 | 1997-02-18 | Noise Cancellation Technologies, Inc. | Industrial headset |
US5828768A (en) | 1994-05-11 | 1998-10-27 | Noise Cancellation Technologies, Inc. | Multimedia personal computer with active noise reduction and piezo speakers |
US5402669A (en) * | 1994-05-16 | 1995-04-04 | General Electric Company | Sensor matching through source modeling and output compensation |
JP3046203B2 (en) | 1994-05-18 | 2000-05-29 | 三菱電機株式会社 | Hands-free communication device |
US5652799A (en) | 1994-06-06 | 1997-07-29 | Noise Cancellation Technologies, Inc. | Noise reducing system |
SE502888C2 (en) * | 1994-06-14 | 1996-02-12 | Volvo Ab | Adaptive microphone device and method for adapting to an incoming target noise signal |
US5638456A (en) | 1994-07-06 | 1997-06-10 | Noise Cancellation Technologies, Inc. | Piezo speaker and installation method for laptop personal computer and other multimedia applications |
US5568557A (en) | 1994-07-29 | 1996-10-22 | Noise Cancellation Technologies, Inc. | Active vibration control system for aircraft |
EP0700156B1 (en) | 1994-09-01 | 2002-06-05 | Nec Corporation | Beamformer using coefficient restrained adaptive filters for cancelling interference signals |
US5815582A (en) | 1994-12-02 | 1998-09-29 | Noise Cancellation Technologies, Inc. | Active plus selective headset |
US5774859A (en) | 1995-01-03 | 1998-06-30 | Scientific-Atlanta, Inc. | Information system having a speech interface |
CA2164025A1 (en) | 1995-01-04 | 1996-07-05 | David Goodwin Shaw | Sub-band signal processor |
US5768473A (en) | 1995-01-30 | 1998-06-16 | Noise Cancellation Technologies, Inc. | Adaptive speech filter |
JP2760373B2 (en) | 1995-03-03 | 1998-05-28 | 日本電気株式会社 | Noise canceller |
US5625697A (en) | 1995-05-08 | 1997-04-29 | Lucent Technologies Inc. | Microphone selection process for use in a multiple microphone voice actuated switching system |
US5592181A (en) | 1995-05-18 | 1997-01-07 | Hughes Aircraft Company | Vehicle position tracking technique |
JP2685031B2 (en) | 1995-06-30 | 1997-12-03 | 日本電気株式会社 | Noise cancellation method and noise cancellation device |
US5835608A (en) | 1995-07-10 | 1998-11-10 | Applied Acoustic Research | Signal separating system |
US5701344A (en) | 1995-08-23 | 1997-12-23 | Canon Kabushiki Kaisha | Audio processing apparatus |
US5615175A (en) | 1995-09-19 | 1997-03-25 | The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Navy | Passive direction finding device |
US5838805A (en) | 1995-11-06 | 1998-11-17 | Noise Cancellation Technologies, Inc. | Piezoelectric transducers |
JP3231599B2 (en) | 1995-11-10 | 2001-11-26 | 旭光学工業株式会社 | Plastic lens dyeing method |
US5909460A (en) | 1995-12-07 | 1999-06-01 | Ericsson, Inc. | Efficient apparatus for simultaneous modulation and digital beamforming for an antenna array |
US5715319A (en) | 1996-05-30 | 1998-02-03 | Picturetel Corporation | Method and apparatus for steerable and endfire superdirective microphone arrays with reduced analog-to-digital converter and computational requirements |
US5825898A (en) * | 1996-06-27 | 1998-10-20 | Lamar Signal Processing Ltd. | System and method for adaptive interference cancelling |
US5724270A (en) | 1996-08-26 | 1998-03-03 | He Holdings, Inc. | Wave-number-frequency adaptive beamforming |
US5874918A (en) | 1996-10-07 | 1999-02-23 | Lockheed Martin Corporation | Doppler triangulation transmitter location system |
US5909495A (en) | 1996-11-05 | 1999-06-01 | Andrea Electronics Corporation | Noise canceling improvement to stethoscope |
US6178248B1 (en) * | 1997-04-14 | 2001-01-23 | Andrea Electronics Corporation | Dual-processing interference cancelling system and method |
US5798983A (en) | 1997-05-22 | 1998-08-25 | Kuhn; John Patrick | Acoustic sensor system for vehicle detection and multi-lane highway monitoring |
US5914912A (en) | 1997-11-28 | 1999-06-22 | United States Of America | Sonar array post processor |
US6084973A (en) * | 1997-12-22 | 2000-07-04 | Audio Technica U.S., Inc. | Digital and analog directional microphone |
-
1999
- 1999-10-25 US US09/427,410 patent/US6594367B1/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
-
2000
- 2000-10-25 EP EP00992128A patent/EP1224837A4/en not_active Withdrawn
- 2000-10-25 CA CA002387797A patent/CA2387797A1/en not_active Abandoned
- 2000-10-25 WO PCT/US2000/041537 patent/WO2001037435A2/en not_active Application Discontinuation
- 2000-10-25 JP JP2001537878A patent/JP2003514481A/en not_active Withdrawn
- 2000-10-25 IL IL14927800A patent/IL149278A0/en unknown
-
2002
- 2002-12-16 HK HK02109126.6A patent/HK1047674A1/en unknown
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
IL149278A0 (en) | 2002-11-10 |
WO2001037435A3 (en) | 2001-10-11 |
WO2001037435A2 (en) | 2001-05-25 |
HK1047674A1 (en) | 2003-02-28 |
US6594367B1 (en) | 2003-07-15 |
EP1224837A2 (en) | 2002-07-24 |
JP2003514481A (en) | 2003-04-15 |
EP1224837A4 (en) | 2003-05-21 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US6594367B1 (en) | Super directional beamforming design and implementation | |
Chen et al. | Quadratically constrained beamforming robust against direction-of-arrival mismatch | |
Van Trees | Optimum array processing: Part IV of detection, estimation, and modulation theory | |
Godara | Smart antennas | |
Reddy et al. | Performance analysis of the optimum beamformer in the presence of correlated sources and its behavior under spatial smoothing | |
Rafaely et al. | Spherical microphone array beamforming | |
Elko et al. | Microphone arrays | |
Yan | Broadband array processing | |
CN113075698A (en) | Deception jamming suppression method in satellite navigation receiver | |
Xia et al. | Noise reduction method for acoustic sensor arrays in underwater noise | |
Abhayapala | Modal analysis and synthesis of broadband nearfield beamforming arrays | |
Sun et al. | Robust spherical microphone array beamforming with multi-beam-multi-null steering, and sidelobe control | |
Wang et al. | Reconfigurable adaptive linear array signal processing in GNSS applications | |
Gazor et al. | Wideband multi-source beamforming with adaptive array location calibration and direction finding | |
Rashida et al. | High Resolution Wideband Acoustic Beamforming and Underwater Target Localization using 64-Element Linear Hydrophone Array | |
Nordholm et al. | Performance limits of the broadband generalized sidelobe cancelling structure in an isotropic noise field | |
Widrow | A review of adaptive antennas | |
Lo | Improving performance of real-symmetric adaptive array by signal blocking | |
Lu et al. | Virtual reconstruction-based robust adaptive beamforming for distributed digital subarray antennas | |
Marr | A selected bibliography on adaptive antenna arrays | |
Zhang et al. | An approach for improving the performance of generalized inverse beamforming | |
Ren et al. | Robust Beamforming Based on Weighted Vector Norm Regularization | |
Sng et al. | Partially adaptive array design using DOA estimation and null steering | |
Yang et al. | Robust matched field noise suppression for towed line array | |
Jensen et al. | Signals in noise |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
FZDE | Discontinued |