CA2447001C - Method for detecting broken valve stem - Google Patents
Method for detecting broken valve stem Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CA2447001C CA2447001C CA 2447001 CA2447001A CA2447001C CA 2447001 C CA2447001 C CA 2447001C CA 2447001 CA2447001 CA 2447001 CA 2447001 A CA2447001 A CA 2447001A CA 2447001 C CA2447001 C CA 2447001C
- Authority
- CA
- Canada
- Prior art keywords
- valve
- set point
- change
- plug
- valve stem
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Expired - Lifetime
Links
Classifications
-
- F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
- F16—ENGINEERING ELEMENTS AND UNITS; GENERAL MEASURES FOR PRODUCING AND MAINTAINING EFFECTIVE FUNCTIONING OF MACHINES OR INSTALLATIONS; THERMAL INSULATION IN GENERAL
- F16K—VALVES; TAPS; COCKS; ACTUATING-FLOATS; DEVICES FOR VENTING OR AERATING
- F16K37/00—Special means in or on valves or other cut-off apparatus for indicating or recording operation thereof, or for enabling an alarm to be given
- F16K37/0025—Electrical or magnetic means
- F16K37/0041—Electrical or magnetic means for measuring valve parameters
-
- F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
- F16—ENGINEERING ELEMENTS AND UNITS; GENERAL MEASURES FOR PRODUCING AND MAINTAINING EFFECTIVE FUNCTIONING OF MACHINES OR INSTALLATIONS; THERMAL INSULATION IN GENERAL
- F16K—VALVES; TAPS; COCKS; ACTUATING-FLOATS; DEVICES FOR VENTING OR AERATING
- F16K37/00—Special means in or on valves or other cut-off apparatus for indicating or recording operation thereof, or for enabling an alarm to be given
- F16K37/0075—For recording or indicating the functioning of a valve in combination with test equipment
- F16K37/0083—For recording or indicating the functioning of a valve in combination with test equipment by measuring valve parameters
-
- F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
- F16—ENGINEERING ELEMENTS AND UNITS; GENERAL MEASURES FOR PRODUCING AND MAINTAINING EFFECTIVE FUNCTIONING OF MACHINES OR INSTALLATIONS; THERMAL INSULATION IN GENERAL
- F16K—VALVES; TAPS; COCKS; ACTUATING-FLOATS; DEVICES FOR VENTING OR AERATING
- F16K37/00—Special means in or on valves or other cut-off apparatus for indicating or recording operation thereof, or for enabling an alarm to be given
- F16K37/0075—For recording or indicating the functioning of a valve in combination with test equipment
- F16K37/0091—For recording or indicating the functioning of a valve in combination with test equipment by measuring fluid parameters
-
- Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
- Y10—TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC
- Y10T—TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER US CLASSIFICATION
- Y10T137/00—Fluid handling
- Y10T137/0318—Processes
-
- Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
- Y10—TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC
- Y10T—TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER US CLASSIFICATION
- Y10T137/00—Fluid handling
- Y10T137/7722—Line condition change responsive valves
- Y10T137/7758—Pilot or servo controlled
- Y10T137/7759—Responsive to change in rate of fluid flow
-
- Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
- Y10—TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC
- Y10T—TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER US CLASSIFICATION
- Y10T137/00—Fluid handling
- Y10T137/7722—Line condition change responsive valves
- Y10T137/7758—Pilot or servo controlled
- Y10T137/7761—Electrically actuated valve
-
- Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
- Y10—TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC
- Y10T—TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER US CLASSIFICATION
- Y10T137/00—Fluid handling
- Y10T137/8158—With indicator, register, recorder, alarm or inspection means
- Y10T137/8175—Plural
-
- Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
- Y10—TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC
- Y10T—TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER US CLASSIFICATION
- Y10T137/00—Fluid handling
- Y10T137/8158—With indicator, register, recorder, alarm or inspection means
- Y10T137/8225—Position or extent of motion indicator
- Y10T137/8242—Electrical
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
- Indication Of The Valve Opening Or Closing Status (AREA)
- Preventing Unauthorised Actuation Of Valves (AREA)
Abstract
A method of providing an indication and alarm of a possible failure in a fluid control valve stem, plug or seat in a process control system having a microprocessor based valve positioner. The drive pressure, drive signal and valve position feedback are monitored. If greater than a predetermined change in the drive pressure or the valve position feedback is detected, then a second series of detection steps is initiated. In the second detection steps the present set point to process value relationship, such as flow rate or other process variable is compared to a stored test cycle derived set point to process value relationship for the same set point. If there is a process value change, then the operator is alerted as this change may indicate there is a damaged valve stem, plug, or seat problem which needs to be inspected.
Description
METHOD FOR DETECTING BROKEN VALVE STEM
This invention relates to valve positioners for positioning fluid valves which control a process variable, and particularly to a method for detecting malfunctioning components of a control valve, such as a damaged or broken valve stem, or a damaged plug or seat.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
Valve positioners are in common usage for controlling fluid valves and associated fluids in oil and gas pipelines, chemical processing plants, etc.
Typically the valve positioners include microprocessors for use in precisely controlling the process fluid and 'caa- ;cerforming diagnostic operations on. the valve..
:~.'~> Various types of posit:i.onerJ ~.r~~ uzse.d in the ~arc»:ess control industry. Some positioraers are n7echanically,coupled to an actuator wY~ile some ivzcorporate the actuator within the po~~.tioner. The actuator provides means for physically positioning the valve and may be either electrically, hydraulically or pneumatically operated. Electric actuators have a current signal which drives a motor which positions the valve. Hydraulic actuators have oil-filled means for positioning the valve. By far the most corr~mon type of valve actuator in the process control industry--a pneumatic actuator has a piston or a combination of a piston and a diaphragm. Depending on the application and the level of control integration, positioners receive several types of input from a controller which are representative of the desired valve position. One type is a current input having a 4-20mA or 10-50mA
This invention relates to valve positioners for positioning fluid valves which control a process variable, and particularly to a method for detecting malfunctioning components of a control valve, such as a damaged or broken valve stem, or a damaged plug or seat.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
Valve positioners are in common usage for controlling fluid valves and associated fluids in oil and gas pipelines, chemical processing plants, etc.
Typically the valve positioners include microprocessors for use in precisely controlling the process fluid and 'caa- ;cerforming diagnostic operations on. the valve..
:~.'~> Various types of posit:i.onerJ ~.r~~ uzse.d in the ~arc»:ess control industry. Some positioraers are n7echanically,coupled to an actuator wY~ile some ivzcorporate the actuator within the po~~.tioner. The actuator provides means for physically positioning the valve and may be either electrically, hydraulically or pneumatically operated. Electric actuators have a current signal which drives a motor which positions the valve. Hydraulic actuators have oil-filled means for positioning the valve. By far the most corr~mon type of valve actuator in the process control industry--a pneumatic actuator has a piston or a combination of a piston and a diaphragm. Depending on the application and the level of control integration, positioners receive several types of input from a controller which are representative of the desired valve position. One type is a current input having a 4-20mA or 10-50mA
magnitude, a second is a digital signal superimposed on the current signal and a third is a fully digital input such as Fieldbus or HART~. Alternatively, the positioner may receive a 3-15 pound per square inch (PSI) pneumatic input representative of the desired valve position. Depending on the level of integration and the application as well, positioners have different types of outputs. Some positioners provide an output current to a motor, while still others have a fast responding hydraulic output. The most common type of positioner output isa 0-200 PSI pneumatic pressure output. Positioners, as the word is used in this application includes all these field mounted instruments, including the various inputs and outputs, and their respective means, far posi.t:ioni.ng valves if ~ipplicable .
In the most c.o~22r.~cr.L c~a~~ ok ~~ sl:.ring and piston/diaphragm actuator,, the di~~ph~agm deflects with the pressure delivered by the positioner, thereby exerting a force or torque on a control valve stem or rotary member, respectively, so as to change the position of the valve. Almost all positioners have a mechanical or an electronic position sensor to provide a position signal which is fed back into a microprocessor based control section of the positioner.
No matter what the specific means are for delivering force to position a valve, positioners having microprocessor based control algorithms are known.
In U.;~. Patent Nos. 5,549,137; 5,558,115; and 5,573,032, all assigned to the same assignee as herein, there is provided a microprocessor based valve positioner whir_h has real-time diagnostics to provide valve and actuator integrity information. All such microprocessor based valve positioners cannot easily detect a broken valve stem, a broken or damaged valve plug, or a broken or damaged valve seat. If the valve stem breaks for instance in such a fashion that the linkage to the positioner instrument is intact, the instrument will monitor feedback and position the actuator to what it thinks is the correct valve position without actually moving the valve plug. In a modern microprocessor based positioner instrument, the positioner should respond rapidly through a valve stem breakage event (typically in less than 100ms). A fast instrument response would mask any possible host monitoring of valve performance, making the occurrence of the 'valve stem breakage continue undetected until some process change occurred due to the failed valve performance. In such conditions, the valve plug could fai' a.n a manner that doesr~' t. gl°ea~ly dist.u!~b tam process, so the broken or damaged valve stem/plug/seat may contimue undetected over a long period of time.
Eventually this would lead to a loss of process control.
Actual detection of such broken valve components as a broken or damaged stem, plug, or seat, would require a vibration sensor or some other sophisticated mechanical sensor which would be expensive and also require add-on hardware to the positioner and valve assembly. It is therefore desirable to provide a technique which can be used to provide a sufficient indication of possible valve component breakage so as to suggest inspection is required by a technician. In particular, it would, be desirable to provide such a stem loss/plug loss/seat loss detection technique which does not require additional mechanical components and which would be independent of any particular valve configuration, and thereby readily implemented to provide an early warning indication that there may be a breakage of a valve component.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
In accordance with the principles of the present inwen~Lion there is provided a method for indicating a possible failure in the valve stem or' valve: plug or valve seat in a configuration where a m~,croprocesso-r based valve positioner is controlling a valve actuator and fluid control valve in a process control system.
in particjular, the drive signal to the cu.r~~ent to pre ssu:re ( i/.C~) micropror.essor based val~,~c~
pos_~~.~_c~ner is LI1J~'1:! tarred; the driwve pressu_~_e ou~:put o:.~
the valve pOS~~',1.C;~I1~7= coupled to the valve actuate~r ivy also monitored for detecting a predetermined change from a. steady drive pressure with r~o change in the seL
point drive signal input to the valve positioner. The valve stem position feedback is also monitored for detecting a predetermined change from a steady 'valve stem position feedback with no change in the set point drive signal. If at least one of the predetermined changes in steady drive pressure and the valve stem position feedback is detected, a stem/plug/seat event indication is provided.
Upon the occurrence of a stem/plug/seat event indication, there is initiated a monitoring of a process value for detecting any deviation in the process value, such as monitoring the relationship of the process flow rate for a set point value and detecting any changes in the relationship with no change in the set point. A deviation in the process value with no change in the set point indicates a possible valve stem breakage or a damaged valve plug or valve seat.
In implementing the method of the present invention, two alar~n~ detections are run in parallel.
The first alarm is for a valve disturbance alarm. Such an alarm would indicate a significant change, such as a greater than 10o change in drive pressure and/or valve position feedback without a corresponding change it set point . vetection of such a significant predetermixaed ch~.nge world then enable detection of a second alarm.
The second ala,.rm would look for a change in the :yet point to process value relationship wit;r_ rio c:ia~-~ngs i:ci th:~ sei,:. paint . If a dif f ex~exvce wac de ~:cc:.::ci;
tip c~n a.n ecTe nt r:ould be sent indicating a x:os;~ib i.e stem/pl.ug/seat r~:~oblem. The operator would then lcsc,l~:
for ~a process problem, which, if detected, woulu lea.c~
tc; a human inspection of the valve.
The significant advantage of the present invention is being able to detect problems with a va7.ve at an early stage and thereby save the possible loss of expensive process fluid. Also, the present invention can be used to identify and select fluid control valves which may require inspection.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
The features of this invention which are believed to be novel are set forth with particularity in the appended claims. The invention may be best understood by reference to the following description taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, in which like reference numerals identify like elements in the several figures and in which:
Figure 1 is a schematic diagram illustrating a microprocessor based valve positioner operating an actuator and a fluid control valve in a process control system; and Figure 2 is a flow chart illustrating the method steps of the present invention.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
Referring now to Figure 1, there is ' illustrated a microprocessor based valve positioner 10 including a current to pressure positioner 12 and a microprocessor 14. The valve positioner 10 is coup~.ed to a supply pressure 16 and receives a drive signal on 1 ~ i.nput 1i ne 18 for providing a r_orrespcnc~ir..a drive pre ssure on output line 20 to a valve aet.::.:at~c.~r .'..:2 . T~::
'~.. autput of the actuator 22 is coupled to a v«:L~re stem 24 of a fluid control valve 26. The valve 26 is coupled into a. pipeline 28 of a fluid process system. The valve stem 24 is connected to a valve plug' 30 which sealingly engages a valve seat 32 in controll,'_ng the flow of fluid from a valve inlet 34, through the valve seat in the valve opened position and to a valve outlet 36.
In typical operations of the fluid process control system, a set point circuit 38 provides a drive signal on the input line 18 to the microprocessor 14 and thereby moves the valve stem 24 through the actuator 22 to provide a desired process value at the output 26 of the valve 26. This process value, which may be for instance a desired flow rate, is determined by a process value measurement device 40 for coupling, for instance, to a well known process proportional/integral/derivative (PID) unit 42 to reset the set point 38. A well know feedback configuration between the valve stem 24 and the valve positioner 10 is provided by a feedback linkage 44 coupled to the valve stem to provide information as to the valve stem position to a valve position sensor 46. A valve position feedback signal. from the valve position sensor 46 is coupled to the microprocessor 14 on feedback line 48.
In this typical fluid process control system, a standard valve positioner cannot easily detect a broken valve stem 24. If the vahre seem 24 breaks in a.
location between the feedbac,ls '_i.nkaae 4n and the va1_ve ~ .
plug 30,' but the feedback :Linkage ~14 to the actuator 2~?
still intact, a starvd<:~x~d ,oos~_i:i=~r._a~~ w~_11 monitol°
feedback and posit:iorl t:'ae oci:;a.ato:r t~~_> v~hat it t:l-~i m'~s ic,,-the correct position without actualize moving the-' va.lve plug 30 .because of the brok:~n valve stem 24. Also, i.n a modern field instrument, a positioner should respond rapidly to such an event (less ahan 100 milla_seconds, typically). A fast field instrument response masks any.
standard monitoring of valve performance, making the broken valve stem go undetected until some process value change occurred which would be sensed by the process value measurement 40 due to the failed valve performance. As indicated previously, in some conditions, the valve stem and plug failure could.be in a manner that doesn't greatly disturb the process, so the broken stem/plug may go undetected for some time.
This would lead to a loss of process control.
Reference may be made to Figure 2 in which there is indicated a method for presenting an _g_ indication of a possible problem in the valve stem, plug or seat and which can be used with other indicators to suggest inspection by a technician should take place. In the valve positioner :10 of the present invention, the microprocessor 14 includes a broken valve stem/plug/seat detection algorithm 50 performing the steps shown in Figure 2.
As shown in Figure 2, the.drive pressure on lane 2G resulting fr°om a. set poin'~ dwi~re sigwal is monitored at step 52 to determine ix a steady drive pressure 52 is maintained. Also, u,l~.e valve position feedback on feedback line 48 is monitored at step 54 to de~~:.ermine whether there° .is a steady po~s~_tion. .feedback 54. Tf t.here is a steady drive pf_esswre 52 and a steady position feedback '54 then it ~ s dej~ex:mined there u,=; no ;item activity '~6 a.m~ v°.~:.~: ~~-.~e~~.~.; -;~e~~~:c_Li.or r~~uta.me a.» clGrl.l.eVed. ~UWeiE'.r, 1i ~:.i~.''. ~~~t.!.':'c: ;rt:?la 1:1'.'e~~tS,.
Lo.r i_rsstance, the force or_ th,e act:uatoL 22 ~~~~.1.1 change, as tl~.e valve plug conducts some force frc~tr t'rze process (or from frictional forces from th..vahxre ~:odlr) u~ to the actuator.
Figure 2 _illustrates two alarm detections run., .in parallel. The first alarm is for a valve disturbance alarm. SllCh an alarm would be a significant, such as a greater than 1.0% change in the drive pressure 20 as determined by the steady drive pressure monitor step 52 and/or greater than a 10%
change in the valve position feedback 48 as determined by the steady position feedback monitor step 54 without a corresponding change.in the set point 38. Thus, if there is not a steady drive pressure at step 52, then an alarm is generated on line 60 to generate a stem event 62. Similarly, if there is a greater than 10%
change in the valve position feedback, then the steady position feedback step 54 monitors this change and provides an indication oil line 64 to generate a stem event 62.
The generate stem event 62 initiates a process deviation detection step 66 which looks f_or any process deviation in the process value measurement 40 for a particular set point within a time window, i.e., related to the process response t.i~.ne (i,a., so called "dead time"), as for instance determined in a prior test cycle and with the test cycle process value to set point relationship being stored in the microprocessor .
14. ' In process GoryparisOI2 step 58, the set point l.c. to process value rel.ati_onshi.p (i.e., set poa_xnt 88 to yl:'oc:er~7 'Value measu:rern~-~z~.t_ 40) :W, looke;a a.'~.- ~=?.th n<~
~~h:~~~~~~: ~.n vl2e Set point:. ~~'haL .:~..~, t~~!e f,r o;;v:~s ;~'i2ang2 co~r~ar.ison step 68 is l.oaainc; ~>or a change between the prNSer~c set point to process tra.lu.e relationship compared to a prior test cycle set point to process value relationship for this same controller at. the same set point. If a difference in the process value to set.
point relationship is detected, then an event is noted to signal a stem and process alert step 70 to alert an operator indicating a possible valve stem, valve plug, or valve seat problem. The operator can then look for a process problem, which, if detected, would lead to a human inspection of the valve 26.
The foregoing detailed description has been given for clearness of understanding only, and no unnecessary limitations should be understood therefrom, as modifications will be obvious to those skilled in the art.
In the most c.o~22r.~cr.L c~a~~ ok ~~ sl:.ring and piston/diaphragm actuator,, the di~~ph~agm deflects with the pressure delivered by the positioner, thereby exerting a force or torque on a control valve stem or rotary member, respectively, so as to change the position of the valve. Almost all positioners have a mechanical or an electronic position sensor to provide a position signal which is fed back into a microprocessor based control section of the positioner.
No matter what the specific means are for delivering force to position a valve, positioners having microprocessor based control algorithms are known.
In U.;~. Patent Nos. 5,549,137; 5,558,115; and 5,573,032, all assigned to the same assignee as herein, there is provided a microprocessor based valve positioner whir_h has real-time diagnostics to provide valve and actuator integrity information. All such microprocessor based valve positioners cannot easily detect a broken valve stem, a broken or damaged valve plug, or a broken or damaged valve seat. If the valve stem breaks for instance in such a fashion that the linkage to the positioner instrument is intact, the instrument will monitor feedback and position the actuator to what it thinks is the correct valve position without actually moving the valve plug. In a modern microprocessor based positioner instrument, the positioner should respond rapidly through a valve stem breakage event (typically in less than 100ms). A fast instrument response would mask any possible host monitoring of valve performance, making the occurrence of the 'valve stem breakage continue undetected until some process change occurred due to the failed valve performance. In such conditions, the valve plug could fai' a.n a manner that doesr~' t. gl°ea~ly dist.u!~b tam process, so the broken or damaged valve stem/plug/seat may contimue undetected over a long period of time.
Eventually this would lead to a loss of process control.
Actual detection of such broken valve components as a broken or damaged stem, plug, or seat, would require a vibration sensor or some other sophisticated mechanical sensor which would be expensive and also require add-on hardware to the positioner and valve assembly. It is therefore desirable to provide a technique which can be used to provide a sufficient indication of possible valve component breakage so as to suggest inspection is required by a technician. In particular, it would, be desirable to provide such a stem loss/plug loss/seat loss detection technique which does not require additional mechanical components and which would be independent of any particular valve configuration, and thereby readily implemented to provide an early warning indication that there may be a breakage of a valve component.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
In accordance with the principles of the present inwen~Lion there is provided a method for indicating a possible failure in the valve stem or' valve: plug or valve seat in a configuration where a m~,croprocesso-r based valve positioner is controlling a valve actuator and fluid control valve in a process control system.
in particjular, the drive signal to the cu.r~~ent to pre ssu:re ( i/.C~) micropror.essor based val~,~c~
pos_~~.~_c~ner is LI1J~'1:! tarred; the driwve pressu_~_e ou~:put o:.~
the valve pOS~~',1.C;~I1~7= coupled to the valve actuate~r ivy also monitored for detecting a predetermined change from a. steady drive pressure with r~o change in the seL
point drive signal input to the valve positioner. The valve stem position feedback is also monitored for detecting a predetermined change from a steady 'valve stem position feedback with no change in the set point drive signal. If at least one of the predetermined changes in steady drive pressure and the valve stem position feedback is detected, a stem/plug/seat event indication is provided.
Upon the occurrence of a stem/plug/seat event indication, there is initiated a monitoring of a process value for detecting any deviation in the process value, such as monitoring the relationship of the process flow rate for a set point value and detecting any changes in the relationship with no change in the set point. A deviation in the process value with no change in the set point indicates a possible valve stem breakage or a damaged valve plug or valve seat.
In implementing the method of the present invention, two alar~n~ detections are run in parallel.
The first alarm is for a valve disturbance alarm. Such an alarm would indicate a significant change, such as a greater than 10o change in drive pressure and/or valve position feedback without a corresponding change it set point . vetection of such a significant predetermixaed ch~.nge world then enable detection of a second alarm.
The second ala,.rm would look for a change in the :yet point to process value relationship wit;r_ rio c:ia~-~ngs i:ci th:~ sei,:. paint . If a dif f ex~exvce wac de ~:cc:.::ci;
tip c~n a.n ecTe nt r:ould be sent indicating a x:os;~ib i.e stem/pl.ug/seat r~:~oblem. The operator would then lcsc,l~:
for ~a process problem, which, if detected, woulu lea.c~
tc; a human inspection of the valve.
The significant advantage of the present invention is being able to detect problems with a va7.ve at an early stage and thereby save the possible loss of expensive process fluid. Also, the present invention can be used to identify and select fluid control valves which may require inspection.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
The features of this invention which are believed to be novel are set forth with particularity in the appended claims. The invention may be best understood by reference to the following description taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, in which like reference numerals identify like elements in the several figures and in which:
Figure 1 is a schematic diagram illustrating a microprocessor based valve positioner operating an actuator and a fluid control valve in a process control system; and Figure 2 is a flow chart illustrating the method steps of the present invention.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
Referring now to Figure 1, there is ' illustrated a microprocessor based valve positioner 10 including a current to pressure positioner 12 and a microprocessor 14. The valve positioner 10 is coup~.ed to a supply pressure 16 and receives a drive signal on 1 ~ i.nput 1i ne 18 for providing a r_orrespcnc~ir..a drive pre ssure on output line 20 to a valve aet.::.:at~c.~r .'..:2 . T~::
'~.. autput of the actuator 22 is coupled to a v«:L~re stem 24 of a fluid control valve 26. The valve 26 is coupled into a. pipeline 28 of a fluid process system. The valve stem 24 is connected to a valve plug' 30 which sealingly engages a valve seat 32 in controll,'_ng the flow of fluid from a valve inlet 34, through the valve seat in the valve opened position and to a valve outlet 36.
In typical operations of the fluid process control system, a set point circuit 38 provides a drive signal on the input line 18 to the microprocessor 14 and thereby moves the valve stem 24 through the actuator 22 to provide a desired process value at the output 26 of the valve 26. This process value, which may be for instance a desired flow rate, is determined by a process value measurement device 40 for coupling, for instance, to a well known process proportional/integral/derivative (PID) unit 42 to reset the set point 38. A well know feedback configuration between the valve stem 24 and the valve positioner 10 is provided by a feedback linkage 44 coupled to the valve stem to provide information as to the valve stem position to a valve position sensor 46. A valve position feedback signal. from the valve position sensor 46 is coupled to the microprocessor 14 on feedback line 48.
In this typical fluid process control system, a standard valve positioner cannot easily detect a broken valve stem 24. If the vahre seem 24 breaks in a.
location between the feedbac,ls '_i.nkaae 4n and the va1_ve ~ .
plug 30,' but the feedback :Linkage ~14 to the actuator 2~?
still intact, a starvd<:~x~d ,oos~_i:i=~r._a~~ w~_11 monitol°
feedback and posit:iorl t:'ae oci:;a.ato:r t~~_> v~hat it t:l-~i m'~s ic,,-the correct position without actualize moving the-' va.lve plug 30 .because of the brok:~n valve stem 24. Also, i.n a modern field instrument, a positioner should respond rapidly to such an event (less ahan 100 milla_seconds, typically). A fast field instrument response masks any.
standard monitoring of valve performance, making the broken valve stem go undetected until some process value change occurred which would be sensed by the process value measurement 40 due to the failed valve performance. As indicated previously, in some conditions, the valve stem and plug failure could.be in a manner that doesn't greatly disturb the process, so the broken stem/plug may go undetected for some time.
This would lead to a loss of process control.
Reference may be made to Figure 2 in which there is indicated a method for presenting an _g_ indication of a possible problem in the valve stem, plug or seat and which can be used with other indicators to suggest inspection by a technician should take place. In the valve positioner :10 of the present invention, the microprocessor 14 includes a broken valve stem/plug/seat detection algorithm 50 performing the steps shown in Figure 2.
As shown in Figure 2, the.drive pressure on lane 2G resulting fr°om a. set poin'~ dwi~re sigwal is monitored at step 52 to determine ix a steady drive pressure 52 is maintained. Also, u,l~.e valve position feedback on feedback line 48 is monitored at step 54 to de~~:.ermine whether there° .is a steady po~s~_tion. .feedback 54. Tf t.here is a steady drive pf_esswre 52 and a steady position feedback '54 then it ~ s dej~ex:mined there u,=; no ;item activity '~6 a.m~ v°.~:.~: ~~-.~e~~.~.; -;~e~~~:c_Li.or r~~uta.me a.» clGrl.l.eVed. ~UWeiE'.r, 1i ~:.i~.''. ~~~t.!.':'c: ;rt:?la 1:1'.'e~~tS,.
Lo.r i_rsstance, the force or_ th,e act:uatoL 22 ~~~~.1.1 change, as tl~.e valve plug conducts some force frc~tr t'rze process (or from frictional forces from th..vahxre ~:odlr) u~ to the actuator.
Figure 2 _illustrates two alarm detections run., .in parallel. The first alarm is for a valve disturbance alarm. SllCh an alarm would be a significant, such as a greater than 1.0% change in the drive pressure 20 as determined by the steady drive pressure monitor step 52 and/or greater than a 10%
change in the valve position feedback 48 as determined by the steady position feedback monitor step 54 without a corresponding change.in the set point 38. Thus, if there is not a steady drive pressure at step 52, then an alarm is generated on line 60 to generate a stem event 62. Similarly, if there is a greater than 10%
change in the valve position feedback, then the steady position feedback step 54 monitors this change and provides an indication oil line 64 to generate a stem event 62.
The generate stem event 62 initiates a process deviation detection step 66 which looks f_or any process deviation in the process value measurement 40 for a particular set point within a time window, i.e., related to the process response t.i~.ne (i,a., so called "dead time"), as for instance determined in a prior test cycle and with the test cycle process value to set point relationship being stored in the microprocessor .
14. ' In process GoryparisOI2 step 58, the set point l.c. to process value rel.ati_onshi.p (i.e., set poa_xnt 88 to yl:'oc:er~7 'Value measu:rern~-~z~.t_ 40) :W, looke;a a.'~.- ~=?.th n<~
~~h:~~~~~~: ~.n vl2e Set point:. ~~'haL .:~..~, t~~!e f,r o;;v:~s ;~'i2ang2 co~r~ar.ison step 68 is l.oaainc; ~>or a change between the prNSer~c set point to process tra.lu.e relationship compared to a prior test cycle set point to process value relationship for this same controller at. the same set point. If a difference in the process value to set.
point relationship is detected, then an event is noted to signal a stem and process alert step 70 to alert an operator indicating a possible valve stem, valve plug, or valve seat problem. The operator can then look for a process problem, which, if detected, would lead to a human inspection of the valve 26.
The foregoing detailed description has been given for clearness of understanding only, and no unnecessary limitations should be understood therefrom, as modifications will be obvious to those skilled in the art.
Claims (3)
1. In a microprocessor based valve positioner having a set point input and providing a drive signal for controlling a valve actuator with corresponding drive pressure for operating and positioning a valve stem and plug with respect to a valve seat of a fluid control valve in response to the valve stem position feedback to the valve positioner, a method for providing an indication of a possible failure in the valve stem or plug or seat, said method comprising:
monitoring the drive signal;
monitoring the drive pressure to the valve acutator for detecting a predetermined change from a steady drive pressure with no change in the set point;
monitoring the valve stem position feedback to the valve positioner for detecting a predetermined change from a steady valve stem position feedback with no change in the set point;
providing a stem/plug/seat event indication if at least one of the predetermined changes in steady drive pressure and valve stem position feedback is detected;
responding to the stem/plug/seat event indication and initiating a monitoring of a process value for detecting any deviation in the process value, including monitoring the relationship of the process value for a set point value and detecting any changes in said relationship with no change in the set point; and providing an alarm in response to detecting a change in said relationship thereby indicating a possible valve stem breakage or a damaged valve plug or valve seat.
monitoring the drive signal;
monitoring the drive pressure to the valve acutator for detecting a predetermined change from a steady drive pressure with no change in the set point;
monitoring the valve stem position feedback to the valve positioner for detecting a predetermined change from a steady valve stem position feedback with no change in the set point;
providing a stem/plug/seat event indication if at least one of the predetermined changes in steady drive pressure and valve stem position feedback is detected;
responding to the stem/plug/seat event indication and initiating a monitoring of a process value for detecting any deviation in the process value, including monitoring the relationship of the process value for a set point value and detecting any changes in said relationship with no change in the set point; and providing an alarm in response to detecting a change in said relationship thereby indicating a possible valve stem breakage or a damaged valve plug or valve seat.
2. The method of claim 1, wherein said monitoring of a process value includes monitoring the process flow rate.
3. The method of claim 2, wherein said monitoring of the process flow rate includes monitoring the relationship of the process flow rate for a set point value and detecting any changes in said relationship with no change in the set point.
Applications Claiming Priority (3)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| US09/836,307 | 2001-04-17 | ||
| US09/836,307 US6382226B1 (en) | 2001-04-17 | 2001-04-17 | Method for detecting broken valve stem |
| PCT/US2002/008791 WO2002084157A1 (en) | 2001-04-17 | 2002-03-21 | Method for detecting broken valve stem |
Publications (2)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| CA2447001A1 CA2447001A1 (en) | 2002-10-24 |
| CA2447001C true CA2447001C (en) | 2008-01-22 |
Family
ID=25271680
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| CA 2447001 Expired - Lifetime CA2447001C (en) | 2001-04-17 | 2002-03-21 | Method for detecting broken valve stem |
Country Status (9)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| US (1) | US6382226B1 (en) |
| EP (1) | EP1379803B1 (en) |
| JP (1) | JP4088160B2 (en) |
| CN (1) | CN1288376C (en) |
| BR (1) | BRPI0208604B1 (en) |
| CA (1) | CA2447001C (en) |
| DE (1) | DE60211325T2 (en) |
| MX (1) | MXPA03009287A (en) |
| WO (1) | WO2002084157A1 (en) |
Families Citing this family (46)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EP0825506B1 (en) | 1996-08-20 | 2013-03-06 | Invensys Systems, Inc. | Methods and apparatus for remote process control |
| US7089530B1 (en) | 1999-05-17 | 2006-08-08 | Invensys Systems, Inc. | Process control configuration system with connection validation and configuration |
| AU5273100A (en) * | 1999-05-17 | 2000-12-05 | Foxboro Company, The | Methods and apparatus for control configuration with versioning, security, composite blocks, edit selection, object swapping, formulaic values and other aspects |
| US6788980B1 (en) | 1999-06-11 | 2004-09-07 | Invensys Systems, Inc. | Methods and apparatus for control using control devices that provide a virtual machine environment and that communicate via an IP network |
| NZ518674A (en) * | 2002-05-01 | 2005-01-28 | Jobe Valves Ltd | Frost proof valve including a valve housing, primary and secondary chambers, a flexible diahragm, an equalisation port and a safety port |
| US6999853B2 (en) * | 2002-05-03 | 2006-02-14 | Fisher Controls International Llc. | Methods and apparatus for operating and performing diagnostics in a control loop of a control valve |
| US6909281B2 (en) | 2002-07-03 | 2005-06-21 | Fisher Controls International Llc | Position sensor using a compound magnetic flux source |
| EP1606589B1 (en) * | 2003-02-21 | 2010-06-23 | Fisher Controls International LLC | Magnetic position sensor with integrated hall effect switch |
| US20050189017A1 (en) * | 2004-02-05 | 2005-09-01 | Evren Eryurek | Emergency shutdown valve diagnostics using a pressure transmitter |
| US20050205824A1 (en) * | 2004-03-18 | 2005-09-22 | Osborne Charles A | Segmented ball control valve with universal end connections |
| EP1733161A4 (en) * | 2004-04-05 | 2009-02-04 | Westlock Controls Corp | Device and method for pneumatic valve control |
| US20060081294A1 (en) * | 2004-10-15 | 2006-04-20 | Festo Corporation | Pressure regulator with integrated flow switch |
| US7504961B2 (en) * | 2005-03-31 | 2009-03-17 | Saudi Arabian Oil Company | Emergency isolation valve controller with integral fault indicator |
| DK200600827A (en) * | 2005-11-04 | 2007-05-05 | Dantaet Electronics As | Method for monitoring the function of a controlled on / off valve |
| DE102005053341A1 (en) * | 2005-11-07 | 2007-05-10 | Bayer Technology Services Gmbh | Use of diaphragm valves for flow control |
| US7283894B2 (en) * | 2006-02-10 | 2007-10-16 | Dresser, Inc. | System and method for fluid regulation |
| US7609056B2 (en) * | 2006-09-11 | 2009-10-27 | Fisher Controls International Llc | Apparatus to determine the position of an actuator |
| DE202006020516U1 (en) * | 2006-12-21 | 2008-10-16 | Abb Ag | Control device for a pressure-medium-operated actuator |
| US7539560B2 (en) * | 2007-01-05 | 2009-05-26 | Dresser, Inc. | Control valve and positioner diagnostics |
| CN104407518B (en) | 2008-06-20 | 2017-05-31 | 因文西斯系统公司 | The system and method interacted to the reality and Simulation Facility for process control |
| US20100051110A1 (en) * | 2008-09-04 | 2010-03-04 | Ch2M Hill, Inc. | Gas actuated valve |
| DE102008062289A1 (en) * | 2008-12-15 | 2010-06-24 | Abb Technology Ag | Method for the path and pressure sensoric wear condition determination of a valve mechanism and such a use valve arrangement |
| FI125797B (en) | 2009-01-09 | 2016-02-29 | Metso Flow Control Oy | Method and equipment for valve condition monitoring |
| US8463964B2 (en) | 2009-05-29 | 2013-06-11 | Invensys Systems, Inc. | Methods and apparatus for control configuration with enhanced change-tracking |
| US8127060B2 (en) | 2009-05-29 | 2012-02-28 | Invensys Systems, Inc | Methods and apparatus for control configuration with control objects that are fieldbus protocol-aware |
| TWI435196B (en) * | 2009-10-15 | 2014-04-21 | Pivotal Systems Corp | Method and apparatus for gas flow control |
| BR112012027910B1 (en) * | 2010-04-30 | 2021-10-05 | Neles Finland Oy | CONTROL VALVE DIAGNOSIS |
| KR101286486B1 (en) | 2010-06-30 | 2013-07-16 | 코웨이 주식회사 | valve control system, bidet using the same and valve control method |
| EP2614281B1 (en) * | 2010-09-09 | 2015-01-14 | GEA Tuchenhagen GmbH | Diagnostic method for poppet valves and measuring device for carrying out said method |
| US9400004B2 (en) | 2010-11-29 | 2016-07-26 | Pivotal Systems Corporation | Transient measurements of mass flow controllers |
| US8421643B2 (en) | 2010-12-01 | 2013-04-16 | Fisher Controls International Llc | Automatic valve seating integrity test |
| US8838413B2 (en) * | 2011-05-12 | 2014-09-16 | Saudi Arabian Oil Company | Valve actuator fault analysis system |
| EP2959197B8 (en) * | 2013-02-25 | 2022-02-09 | Bruker Nano, Inc. | Smart valve |
| IL227323A (en) | 2013-07-04 | 2016-06-30 | Israel Radomsky | System for wirelessly monitoring and predicting failures of linear valves |
| EP3702873A1 (en) * | 2013-12-20 | 2020-09-02 | IMI Hydronic Engineering International SA | A valve and a method of operating a valve |
| US9465391B2 (en) * | 2014-01-09 | 2016-10-11 | Fisher Controls International Llc | Valve positioner with overpressure protection capabilities |
| AR100120A1 (en) * | 2014-04-04 | 2016-09-14 | Fisher Controls Int Llc | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR CONTROLLING A VALVE |
| US9752599B2 (en) * | 2014-05-07 | 2017-09-05 | Fisher Controls International Llc | Methods and apparatus to partial stroke test valves using pressure control |
| DE102015005832B3 (en) * | 2015-05-07 | 2016-11-03 | Samson Aktiengesellschaft | Field device for regulating a process fluid flow |
| US9933088B2 (en) * | 2015-06-10 | 2018-04-03 | Woodward, Inc. | Rotary actuated valve with position indicator |
| US10401202B2 (en) | 2015-07-10 | 2019-09-03 | Pivotal Systems Corporation | Method and apparatus for gas flow control |
| KR20170022763A (en) * | 2015-08-21 | 2017-03-02 | 한국기계연구원 | Valve actuator monitoring apparatus for a failure of stem in an operation of the valve actuator |
| US11131398B2 (en) * | 2018-08-14 | 2021-09-28 | Automatic Switch Company | Smart pinch valve |
| CN110230727B (en) * | 2019-06-26 | 2021-07-23 | 玉环大地铜业股份有限公司 | Valve capable of self-checking and alarming and automatically closing when valve is damaged |
| US11215959B2 (en) | 2019-12-11 | 2022-01-04 | Schneider Electric USA, Inc. | Field device with high speed communication |
| CN113108120B (en) * | 2021-05-10 | 2022-11-25 | 河南泉舜流体控制科技有限公司 | Automatic locking device with valve rod bending detection function for butterfly valve |
Family Cites Families (9)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US5109692A (en) | 1988-08-25 | 1992-05-05 | Fisher Controls International Inc. | Diagnostic apparatus and method for fluid control valves |
| US5197328A (en) * | 1988-08-25 | 1993-03-30 | Fisher Controls International, Inc. | Diagnostic apparatus and method for fluid control valves |
| US5439021A (en) | 1992-09-09 | 1995-08-08 | Fisher Controls International, Inc. | Electro-pneumatic converter |
| MX9306169A (en) | 1992-10-05 | 1995-01-31 | Fisher Controls Int | CALIBRATION OF THE ELECTRO-PNEUMATIC CONVERTER. |
| MX9306152A (en) | 1992-10-05 | 1994-05-31 | Fisher Controls Int | COMMUNICATION SYSTEM AND METHOD. |
| US5549137A (en) | 1993-08-25 | 1996-08-27 | Rosemount Inc. | Valve positioner with pressure feedback, dynamic correction and diagnostics |
| JP3182717B2 (en) * | 1996-06-06 | 2001-07-03 | 株式会社山武 | Control valve abnormality detection method and detection device |
| FI104129B1 (en) * | 1996-06-11 | 1999-11-15 | Neles Jamesbury Oy | Procedure for monitoring the condition of control valve |
| AU2001283197A1 (en) * | 2000-08-22 | 2002-03-04 | Fisher Controls International Inc. | Method for detecting plug wear |
-
2001
- 2001-04-17 US US09/836,307 patent/US6382226B1/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
-
2002
- 2002-03-21 CN CNB028083091A patent/CN1288376C/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 2002-03-21 JP JP2002581868A patent/JP4088160B2/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 2002-03-21 BR BRPI0208604A patent/BRPI0208604B1/en not_active IP Right Cessation
- 2002-03-21 WO PCT/US2002/008791 patent/WO2002084157A1/en active IP Right Grant
- 2002-03-21 MX MXPA03009287A patent/MXPA03009287A/en active IP Right Grant
- 2002-03-21 DE DE2002611325 patent/DE60211325T2/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 2002-03-21 EP EP20020725295 patent/EP1379803B1/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 2002-03-21 CA CA 2447001 patent/CA2447001C/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
Also Published As
| Publication number | Publication date |
|---|---|
| CN1503884A (en) | 2004-06-09 |
| BR0208604A (en) | 2004-03-02 |
| MXPA03009287A (en) | 2004-01-29 |
| JP4088160B2 (en) | 2008-05-21 |
| EP1379803A1 (en) | 2004-01-14 |
| DE60211325D1 (en) | 2006-06-14 |
| CA2447001A1 (en) | 2002-10-24 |
| WO2002084157A1 (en) | 2002-10-24 |
| CN1288376C (en) | 2006-12-06 |
| JP2005502824A (en) | 2005-01-27 |
| EP1379803B1 (en) | 2006-05-10 |
| DE60211325T2 (en) | 2007-04-26 |
| US6382226B1 (en) | 2002-05-07 |
| BRPI0208604B1 (en) | 2016-10-25 |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| CA2447001C (en) | Method for detecting broken valve stem | |
| CA2637713C (en) | Versatile emergency shutdown device controller | |
| US8768631B2 (en) | Diagnostic method for detecting control valve component failure | |
| JP3595554B2 (en) | Valve position controller with pressure feedback, dynamic compensation, and diagnostics | |
| US11274685B2 (en) | Actuator of a process device having a controller configured to operate in a measured position feedback mode and a simulated position feedback mode |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| EEER | Examination request | ||
| MKEX | Expiry |
Effective date: 20220321 |