CA2455639C - Automated listing management - Google Patents
Automated listing management Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CA2455639C CA2455639C CA2455639A CA2455639A CA2455639C CA 2455639 C CA2455639 C CA 2455639C CA 2455639 A CA2455639 A CA 2455639A CA 2455639 A CA2455639 A CA 2455639A CA 2455639 C CA2455639 C CA 2455639C
- Authority
- CA
- Canada
- Prior art keywords
- offerings
- logic
- operative
- offering
- rules
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Expired - Lifetime
Links
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q10/00—Administration; Management
- G06Q10/08—Logistics, e.g. warehousing, loading or distribution; Inventory or stock management
- G06Q10/087—Inventory or stock management, e.g. order filling, procurement or balancing against orders
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q30/00—Commerce
- G06Q30/02—Marketing; Price estimation or determination; Fundraising
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q30/00—Commerce
- G06Q30/06—Buying, selling or leasing transactions
- G06Q30/0601—Electronic shopping [e-shopping]
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q30/00—Commerce
- G06Q30/06—Buying, selling or leasing transactions
- G06Q30/08—Auctions
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q50/00—Systems or methods specially adapted for specific business sectors, e.g. utilities or tourism
- G06Q50/10—Services
Abstract
Disclosed is a sales system for lots of items that includes business rule definition logic as depicted in Figure 1. The sales system also includes offering creation logic that is operative to dynamically create different offerings for items in the lots. The offering creation logic optimizes return based on one or more of the business rules by using different offering parameter values for the different offerings.
Description
AUTOMATED LISTING MANAGEMENT
=
Copyright Notice Portions of the disclosure of this patent document contain material that is subject to copyright protection. The copyright owner has no objection to the facsimile reproduction by anyone of the patent document or patent disclosure as it appears in the Patent and Trademark Office patent file or records, but otherwise reserves all copyright rights whatsoever. Copyright FairMarket, Inc. 2001, 2002.
Field of the Invention The invention relates to systems capable of managing surplus inventory, such as systems that optimize price for surplus goods or services.
Background of the Invention There are a variety of different types of network-based sales systems now in existence. A
number of these implement the traditional English auction. This mechanism efficiently allocates individual lots by awarding them to the buyers who attribute the most value to them. But English auctions are not necessarily an optimum mechanism for selling larger quantities of goods, such as seasonal retail items, overstock, or discontinued merchandise, and these types of goods are therefore often sold using other types of electronic sales systems.
The simplest of these alternate systems strive to reproduce an in-store shopping experience in which goods are offered for sale at a particular non-negotiable markdown price.
This approach requires sellers to gauge the demand for their products so that they can determine a price that is high enough to allow them an acceptable return, but not so high that few or no buyers will purchase them. This process can be difficult and time consuming, and may be too much so to be warranted for relatively small lots of goods. And setting a particular price can also allow some individuals who place a high value on an item to buy it for less than that value.
So-called Request-for-Proposal (RFP) systems allow buyers to place bids, which sellers can then choose to satisfy. These systems can allow sellers to provide the same goods to buyers who value them differently and thereby improve their profit levels. And although at least one system warns users against bids that are too low, such systems can be daunting to some buyers because they must thoroughly understand the value and demand for the item, or risk submitting bids that are too high.
Falling-price systems drop the price of goods over time until they are sold.
Buyers can commit to buy early, or wait for a lower price at the risk of losing the item.
At least one such system allows a user to pay a premium to place firm bids for later days using a so-called buyer's agent. Like RFP systems, falling-price systems can allow sellers to provide the same goods to buyers who value them differently. But they can also be daunting to some buyers, who must thoroughly understand the value and demand for the item, or risk submitting bids that are too high.
The network-based sales mechanisms described so far are by no means the only ones currently available to buyers and sellers. Others include Dutch auctions, sealed bid auctions, and classifieds. But no single one of all of these different mechanisms appears to present an optimum solution for selling larger lots of goods, such as seasonal retail items, overstock, or discontinued merchandise.
Summary of the Invention In one general aspect, the invention features a sales system for lots of items that includes business rule definition logic. The sales system also includes offering creation logic that is operative to dynamically create different offerings for items in the lots. The offering creation logic optimizes return based on one or more of the business rules by using different offering parameter values for the different offerings.
In preferred embodiments, the business rule definition logic can be operative to define rules based on a target cost recovery rate. The business rule definition logic can be responsive to user business rule creation commands. The offering creation logic can be operative to optimize return by adjusting lot price. The offering creation logic can be operative to optimize return by adjusting lot quantity. The offering creation logic can be operative to create offerings for a plurality of sales channels. The offering creation logic can be operative to adjust offerings on one of the sales channels based on results from another of the sales channels.
The business rule definition logic can be operative to create rules that are dependent on results from prior offerings.
The business rule definition logic can be operative to create rules that are dependent on margins from prior offerings. The price offering creation logic can be operative to create a series of auctions based on parameters determined by results from previous auctions. The business rule definition logic can be operative to create offerings based on absolute or relative amounts. The business rule definition logic can employ a web-based interface. The business rules can be set on a SKU, category, and site level. The system can further include default sales parameter creation logic operative to set sales parameters for the offerings. The sales parameter creation =
=
Copyright Notice Portions of the disclosure of this patent document contain material that is subject to copyright protection. The copyright owner has no objection to the facsimile reproduction by anyone of the patent document or patent disclosure as it appears in the Patent and Trademark Office patent file or records, but otherwise reserves all copyright rights whatsoever. Copyright FairMarket, Inc. 2001, 2002.
Field of the Invention The invention relates to systems capable of managing surplus inventory, such as systems that optimize price for surplus goods or services.
Background of the Invention There are a variety of different types of network-based sales systems now in existence. A
number of these implement the traditional English auction. This mechanism efficiently allocates individual lots by awarding them to the buyers who attribute the most value to them. But English auctions are not necessarily an optimum mechanism for selling larger quantities of goods, such as seasonal retail items, overstock, or discontinued merchandise, and these types of goods are therefore often sold using other types of electronic sales systems.
The simplest of these alternate systems strive to reproduce an in-store shopping experience in which goods are offered for sale at a particular non-negotiable markdown price.
This approach requires sellers to gauge the demand for their products so that they can determine a price that is high enough to allow them an acceptable return, but not so high that few or no buyers will purchase them. This process can be difficult and time consuming, and may be too much so to be warranted for relatively small lots of goods. And setting a particular price can also allow some individuals who place a high value on an item to buy it for less than that value.
So-called Request-for-Proposal (RFP) systems allow buyers to place bids, which sellers can then choose to satisfy. These systems can allow sellers to provide the same goods to buyers who value them differently and thereby improve their profit levels. And although at least one system warns users against bids that are too low, such systems can be daunting to some buyers because they must thoroughly understand the value and demand for the item, or risk submitting bids that are too high.
Falling-price systems drop the price of goods over time until they are sold.
Buyers can commit to buy early, or wait for a lower price at the risk of losing the item.
At least one such system allows a user to pay a premium to place firm bids for later days using a so-called buyer's agent. Like RFP systems, falling-price systems can allow sellers to provide the same goods to buyers who value them differently. But they can also be daunting to some buyers, who must thoroughly understand the value and demand for the item, or risk submitting bids that are too high.
The network-based sales mechanisms described so far are by no means the only ones currently available to buyers and sellers. Others include Dutch auctions, sealed bid auctions, and classifieds. But no single one of all of these different mechanisms appears to present an optimum solution for selling larger lots of goods, such as seasonal retail items, overstock, or discontinued merchandise.
Summary of the Invention In one general aspect, the invention features a sales system for lots of items that includes business rule definition logic. The sales system also includes offering creation logic that is operative to dynamically create different offerings for items in the lots. The offering creation logic optimizes return based on one or more of the business rules by using different offering parameter values for the different offerings.
In preferred embodiments, the business rule definition logic can be operative to define rules based on a target cost recovery rate. The business rule definition logic can be responsive to user business rule creation commands. The offering creation logic can be operative to optimize return by adjusting lot price. The offering creation logic can be operative to optimize return by adjusting lot quantity. The offering creation logic can be operative to create offerings for a plurality of sales channels. The offering creation logic can be operative to adjust offerings on one of the sales channels based on results from another of the sales channels.
The business rule definition logic can be operative to create rules that are dependent on results from prior offerings.
The business rule definition logic can be operative to create rules that are dependent on margins from prior offerings. The price offering creation logic can be operative to create a series of auctions based on parameters determined by results from previous auctions. The business rule definition logic can be operative to create offerings based on absolute or relative amounts. The business rule definition logic can employ a web-based interface. The business rules can be set on a SKU, category, and site level. The system can further include default sales parameter creation logic operative to set sales parameters for the offerings. The sales parameter creation =
2 logic can be operative to set bidding parameters for an auction. The price offering creation logic can use exponential smoothing to derive parameters for the price offerings.
The system can further include search logic operative to search for items in the lots. The system can further include falling price default logic operative to create fixed default falling price parameters. The system can further include scheduled allocation logic operative to create a scheduled set of offerings with predetermined parameters. The system can further include item display logic operative to display information about items in each of the lots with controls that allow the user to access the business rule definition logic for the item in the lot for which information is displayed. The system can further include a forecasting report generator operative to produce a report that forecasts future operation of the offering creation logic.
In another general aspect, the invention features a sales system for lots of items that includes means for defining machine-readable business rules and means for automatically creating a plurality of different offerings for items in the lots based on the machine-readable business rules defined by the means for defining. The means for automatically creating optimizes return based the machine-readable business rules defined by the means for defining using different offering parameter values for the different offerings.
In a further general aspect, the invention features a method of selling lots of items that includes defining machine-readable business rules and automatically creating a plurality of different offerings for items in the lots based on the machine-readable business rules. The step of automatically creating optimizes return based on the machine-readable business rules defined in the step of defining using different offering parameter values for the different offerings.
Systems according to the invention can be beneficial in that they allow for the creation of rules that can be used to automatically liquidate lots of items. Once the rules are created, the user does not need to monitor the liquidation process any further. This makes the task of liquidating items more cost-effective than a manual approach might be. And rules may even perform better than would a human defining listings based on his or her subjective judgments.
Description of the Drawing Fig. 1 is a block diagram generally illustrating the operation of an illustrative embodiment of a Surplus Inventory Management System (SIMS) according to the invention;
Fig. 2 is diagram illustrating an item or product page for the SIMS of Fig. 1;
Fig. 3 is a diagram illustrating a defaults page for the SIMS of Fig. 1;
Fig. 4 is a diagram illustrating a services page for the SIMS of Fig. 1;
Fig. 5 is a diagram illustrating a search page for the SIMS of Fig. 1;
The system can further include search logic operative to search for items in the lots. The system can further include falling price default logic operative to create fixed default falling price parameters. The system can further include scheduled allocation logic operative to create a scheduled set of offerings with predetermined parameters. The system can further include item display logic operative to display information about items in each of the lots with controls that allow the user to access the business rule definition logic for the item in the lot for which information is displayed. The system can further include a forecasting report generator operative to produce a report that forecasts future operation of the offering creation logic.
In another general aspect, the invention features a sales system for lots of items that includes means for defining machine-readable business rules and means for automatically creating a plurality of different offerings for items in the lots based on the machine-readable business rules defined by the means for defining. The means for automatically creating optimizes return based the machine-readable business rules defined by the means for defining using different offering parameter values for the different offerings.
In a further general aspect, the invention features a method of selling lots of items that includes defining machine-readable business rules and automatically creating a plurality of different offerings for items in the lots based on the machine-readable business rules. The step of automatically creating optimizes return based on the machine-readable business rules defined in the step of defining using different offering parameter values for the different offerings.
Systems according to the invention can be beneficial in that they allow for the creation of rules that can be used to automatically liquidate lots of items. Once the rules are created, the user does not need to monitor the liquidation process any further. This makes the task of liquidating items more cost-effective than a manual approach might be. And rules may even perform better than would a human defining listings based on his or her subjective judgments.
Description of the Drawing Fig. 1 is a block diagram generally illustrating the operation of an illustrative embodiment of a Surplus Inventory Management System (SIMS) according to the invention;
Fig. 2 is diagram illustrating an item or product page for the SIMS of Fig. 1;
Fig. 3 is a diagram illustrating a defaults page for the SIMS of Fig. 1;
Fig. 4 is a diagram illustrating a services page for the SIMS of Fig. 1;
Fig. 5 is a diagram illustrating a search page for the SIMS of Fig. 1;
3 Fig. 6 is an illustrative plot of listing quantity against listing history for the SAWS of Fig.
1;
Fig. 7 is a diagram illustrating a business rules default page for the SIMS of Fig. 1;
Fig. 8 is a diagram illustrating a business rules page for the SIMS of Fig. 1;
Fig. 9 is a diagram illustrating an override control for the SIMS of Fig. 1;
Fig. 10 is a diagram illustrating a reporting page for the SIMS of Fig. 1;
Fig. 11 is a diagram illustrating an item page for an another embodiment of the SIMS
system of Fig. 1;
Fig. 12 is a diagram illustrating a scheduled allocation page for the SIMS of Fig. 11;
Fig..13 is a diagram illustrating an item page for the SIMS of Fig. 11;
Fig. 14 is a diagram illustrating an automatic listing settings page for the SIMS of Fig.
11;
Fig. 15 is a diagram illustrating an item or product editing page for the SIMS
of Fig. 11;
and Fig. 16 is a diagram illustrating a rules report page for the SIMS of Fig. 11.
petalled Deserlotiqn of an Illustrative Embodiment A Surplus Inventory Management System (SIMS) according to the invention is a logic driven re-listing and inventory management engine designed to handle all or some portion of the customer's excess inventory. It operates generally according to Fig.!. SKU, pricing, images and copy are ftrst extracted 14 from client databases 10,12 into extract files16 that allow product information to be uploaded into the SIMS 20. Offerings are created and distributed 22 based on the SIMS and can be sent to a sales site, such as an auction site 24.
Fulfillment information can then be extracted and used to update the SIMS and user and product information can be ' transferred to the client database 12. Cost recovery parameters can be managed separately 30 though the SIMS.
The SIMS preferably should allow one or more customers to allocate surplus inventory into a centralized database that automatically Mists items into an auction system, which can be run by an auction service provider, based on a set of predefined business rules. Suitable auction functionality is described in "Publishing System for Network-Based Sales,"
filed November 16, 1999, issued serial no. 09/441,385, which is the basis for published per application no.
PCT/US00/31542, entitled "Network-Based Sales System," filed Nov. 16, 2000,
1;
Fig. 7 is a diagram illustrating a business rules default page for the SIMS of Fig. 1;
Fig. 8 is a diagram illustrating a business rules page for the SIMS of Fig. 1;
Fig. 9 is a diagram illustrating an override control for the SIMS of Fig. 1;
Fig. 10 is a diagram illustrating a reporting page for the SIMS of Fig. 1;
Fig. 11 is a diagram illustrating an item page for an another embodiment of the SIMS
system of Fig. 1;
Fig. 12 is a diagram illustrating a scheduled allocation page for the SIMS of Fig. 11;
Fig..13 is a diagram illustrating an item page for the SIMS of Fig. 11;
Fig. 14 is a diagram illustrating an automatic listing settings page for the SIMS of Fig.
11;
Fig. 15 is a diagram illustrating an item or product editing page for the SIMS
of Fig. 11;
and Fig. 16 is a diagram illustrating a rules report page for the SIMS of Fig. 11.
petalled Deserlotiqn of an Illustrative Embodiment A Surplus Inventory Management System (SIMS) according to the invention is a logic driven re-listing and inventory management engine designed to handle all or some portion of the customer's excess inventory. It operates generally according to Fig.!. SKU, pricing, images and copy are ftrst extracted 14 from client databases 10,12 into extract files16 that allow product information to be uploaded into the SIMS 20. Offerings are created and distributed 22 based on the SIMS and can be sent to a sales site, such as an auction site 24.
Fulfillment information can then be extracted and used to update the SIMS and user and product information can be ' transferred to the client database 12. Cost recovery parameters can be managed separately 30 though the SIMS.
The SIMS preferably should allow one or more customers to allocate surplus inventory into a centralized database that automatically Mists items into an auction system, which can be run by an auction service provider, based on a set of predefined business rules. Suitable auction functionality is described in "Publishing System for Network-Based Sales,"
filed November 16, 1999, issued serial no. 09/441,385, which is the basis for published per application no.
PCT/US00/31542, entitled "Network-Based Sales System," filed Nov. 16, 2000,
4
5 PCT/US02/23289 The SIMS preferably provides real-time reports and audits of upcoming listings as well as historical results of past listings. It also preferably displays a master scheduler report and exception report of all upcoming customer listings (quantity, retail value, predicted sell value) by category and date to help plan inventory allocation and forecast future revenue.
Listing flexibility is important for the SIMS since not all inventories may flow through the SIMS engine. Product data can be loaded into the SIMS database via text files, Microsoft Excel files or an XML interface. A data validation procedure can ensure that the upload contains the proper fields and format. In this embodiment, the following fields are provided for:
Required Fields ¨ each row must contain the following SKU ¨ A unique identifier for each product Category ¨ Used to roll up aggregate data for reporting Quantity Available ¨ Number of units available per SKU
Cost Per Unit ¨ Cost value per SKU
Format ¨ Auction, Falling Price Optional Fields - data may be excluded; excluded information will default to by site or category Image Reference Description Target Cost Recovery Rate ¨ Ideal price each SKU should achieve.
Starting Quantity ¨ Default quantity of listing by SKU. Will allow for higher velocity of high inventory items.
Start Date Starting Time End Time Bid Increment Reserve Price Rest Period ¨ Days between Listing Listing Logic ¨ Allows the customer to override business rules and move listings out in a linear fashion rather than iterating demand curve.
Fixed Quantity ¨ If business rules are overridden this field will dictate the number of items in each listing.
Referring to Fig. 2, in addition to mass upload, a Hypertext Markup Language (HTML) interface can allow for manipulation by SKU. The HTML interface can provide (see also item page 34):
New SKU and Inventory combination Updating Previous SKU and Inventory Search Add Delete Edit In addition to auctions, the SIMS can support listings in other pricing tomes.
For example, referring to Fig. 3, the SIMS can logically allocate inventories using a falling price auction model ("plunging ptices") by using the format variable. The business rules can work in the same manner as auctions. The SIMS can control the reserve price and quantity dependent on mania&
No additional information is required for these channels except for predefined defaults.
There can be a separate screen 36 to capture this default information. To increase upload efficiency, plunging price variables can be derived from auction variables and the default settings. This way, items can move between channels with the change ofjust theformat parameter.
Fixed price listings can be managed through the same process. The fixed price listing can be priced at some percent of cost and applied at the SW, category, or site level. This channel can also be open to use other systems, such as a demand based pricing engine described in "Sales System With Sales Activity Feedback," serial no. 09/686,073, and "Sales System With Buyer Price Selection," serial no. 09/685,449, both filed on Oct. 11,2000.
Referring again to Fig 1, the SIMS can also have the ability to automatically move inventory into other channels 32 such as another web auction provider or B2B
channels. The customer can have the same fulfillment process with the SIMS as before. The SIMS can use that current report to allocate/de-allocate inventory. No additional work is needed to fulfill based on the SIMS listings.
The snvis can have scheduling reports that forecast future lots, quantities and sales based on the most current information. For example, a lot of 100 camcorders that have a duration of one week, and assuming movement of 10 units a week, would show 10 lots of quantity 10 for the next ten weeks with the corresponding sales forecast. This should help the customer plan and schedule inventory more efficiently.
Retelling to Fig. 4, the customer can interact with the SIMS via an administrative back end that is also used for auctions, but also includes an additional professional services link.
Alternatively, the Emotionality could be provided in a dedicated software product The administrative back end can provide a services page 38 that includes links for the SIMS, including a mass upload link, a search link, a reporting link, and a manage business rules link.
Referring to Fig. 5, the customer can search for SIMS listings with a search page 40 using the following criteria:
Listing flexibility is important for the SIMS since not all inventories may flow through the SIMS engine. Product data can be loaded into the SIMS database via text files, Microsoft Excel files or an XML interface. A data validation procedure can ensure that the upload contains the proper fields and format. In this embodiment, the following fields are provided for:
Required Fields ¨ each row must contain the following SKU ¨ A unique identifier for each product Category ¨ Used to roll up aggregate data for reporting Quantity Available ¨ Number of units available per SKU
Cost Per Unit ¨ Cost value per SKU
Format ¨ Auction, Falling Price Optional Fields - data may be excluded; excluded information will default to by site or category Image Reference Description Target Cost Recovery Rate ¨ Ideal price each SKU should achieve.
Starting Quantity ¨ Default quantity of listing by SKU. Will allow for higher velocity of high inventory items.
Start Date Starting Time End Time Bid Increment Reserve Price Rest Period ¨ Days between Listing Listing Logic ¨ Allows the customer to override business rules and move listings out in a linear fashion rather than iterating demand curve.
Fixed Quantity ¨ If business rules are overridden this field will dictate the number of items in each listing.
Referring to Fig. 2, in addition to mass upload, a Hypertext Markup Language (HTML) interface can allow for manipulation by SKU. The HTML interface can provide (see also item page 34):
New SKU and Inventory combination Updating Previous SKU and Inventory Search Add Delete Edit In addition to auctions, the SIMS can support listings in other pricing tomes.
For example, referring to Fig. 3, the SIMS can logically allocate inventories using a falling price auction model ("plunging ptices") by using the format variable. The business rules can work in the same manner as auctions. The SIMS can control the reserve price and quantity dependent on mania&
No additional information is required for these channels except for predefined defaults.
There can be a separate screen 36 to capture this default information. To increase upload efficiency, plunging price variables can be derived from auction variables and the default settings. This way, items can move between channels with the change ofjust theformat parameter.
Fixed price listings can be managed through the same process. The fixed price listing can be priced at some percent of cost and applied at the SW, category, or site level. This channel can also be open to use other systems, such as a demand based pricing engine described in "Sales System With Sales Activity Feedback," serial no. 09/686,073, and "Sales System With Buyer Price Selection," serial no. 09/685,449, both filed on Oct. 11,2000.
Referring again to Fig 1, the SIMS can also have the ability to automatically move inventory into other channels 32 such as another web auction provider or B2B
channels. The customer can have the same fulfillment process with the SIMS as before. The SIMS can use that current report to allocate/de-allocate inventory. No additional work is needed to fulfill based on the SIMS listings.
The snvis can have scheduling reports that forecast future lots, quantities and sales based on the most current information. For example, a lot of 100 camcorders that have a duration of one week, and assuming movement of 10 units a week, would show 10 lots of quantity 10 for the next ten weeks with the corresponding sales forecast. This should help the customer plan and schedule inventory more efficiently.
Retelling to Fig. 4, the customer can interact with the SIMS via an administrative back end that is also used for auctions, but also includes an additional professional services link.
Alternatively, the Emotionality could be provided in a dedicated software product The administrative back end can provide a services page 38 that includes links for the SIMS, including a mass upload link, a search link, a reporting link, and a manage business rules link.
Referring to Fig. 5, the customer can search for SIMS listings with a search page 40 using the following criteria:
6 =
SKU
Quantity Available Creation Date Category Target Cost Recovery Rate Title Each SKU can be editable in real-time by the following criteria:
Quantity Available Target Cost Recovery Start Time End Time Bid Increment Rest Period Pricing Format Open listings may not be modified expect in standard methods (close a listing, description edits).
The rules engine can be set at the site, category or SKU level. Defaults will be set by the same level structure such that any omitted field in the business logic will default to the next highest level. For example, if the target cost recovery rate is omitted for a Panasonic camcorder, it will default to electronics' cost recovery rate. If that is omitted, it will default to the site cost recovery rates. All business rules will have the same default logic resulting in rules that are as specific as necessary.
Referring to Fig. 6, two modes are available. In a first mode (mode one), cost recovery of last listing will be used (see e.g., curve 42). In a second mode (mode two), exponential smoothing may be used if necessary (see, e.g., curve 44). Exponential smoothing eliminates the relative peaks and valleys of demands. It works by weighting past results with different coefficients to make less drastic changes in lot quantities.
A sample business objective could be to maximize total sales subject to inventory and a 50% cost-dollar recovery rate. This objective could employ the following business rules:
Starting bid is always $1 List duration is always 4 days Auctions always start at 1:00 AM (EST) and end at 10:00 PM (EST) If cost recovery is greater than 50%, then increase quantity of the next listing by 1 If cost recovery is between 42-50%, then keep quantity of next listing constant If cost recovery is less than 40%, then decrease quantity of next listing by 1 Based on the customer's empirical data of "8pc. Venetian Scallop Towels ¨
White," for example, the SIMS could have produced the results shown in Tables 1 and 2.
SKU
Quantity Available Creation Date Category Target Cost Recovery Rate Title Each SKU can be editable in real-time by the following criteria:
Quantity Available Target Cost Recovery Start Time End Time Bid Increment Rest Period Pricing Format Open listings may not be modified expect in standard methods (close a listing, description edits).
The rules engine can be set at the site, category or SKU level. Defaults will be set by the same level structure such that any omitted field in the business logic will default to the next highest level. For example, if the target cost recovery rate is omitted for a Panasonic camcorder, it will default to electronics' cost recovery rate. If that is omitted, it will default to the site cost recovery rates. All business rules will have the same default logic resulting in rules that are as specific as necessary.
Referring to Fig. 6, two modes are available. In a first mode (mode one), cost recovery of last listing will be used (see e.g., curve 42). In a second mode (mode two), exponential smoothing may be used if necessary (see, e.g., curve 44). Exponential smoothing eliminates the relative peaks and valleys of demands. It works by weighting past results with different coefficients to make less drastic changes in lot quantities.
A sample business objective could be to maximize total sales subject to inventory and a 50% cost-dollar recovery rate. This objective could employ the following business rules:
Starting bid is always $1 List duration is always 4 days Auctions always start at 1:00 AM (EST) and end at 10:00 PM (EST) If cost recovery is greater than 50%, then increase quantity of the next listing by 1 If cost recovery is between 42-50%, then keep quantity of next listing constant If cost recovery is less than 40%, then decrease quantity of next listing by 1 Based on the customer's empirical data of "8pc. Venetian Scallop Towels ¨
White," for example, the SIMS could have produced the results shown in Tables 1 and 2.
7 Item Quantity 8pc. Venetian Scallop Towels ¨ White 69.76% 51.03% 41.22%
Table 1 Step Input SIMS Action 1. Upload nine (9) 8pc. Venetian - Create a test listing of quantity 1.
Scallop Towels ¨ White - Allocate 1 unit to "reserve" status leaving 8 units available in the SIMS.
2. Test listing closes for 69.76% - De-allocate 1 unit from "reserve"
status, since cost recovery. item is sold.
- Evaluate cost recovery rate. Based on business rules increase quantity to 2 units.
- Allocate 2 units to "reserve" status leaving 6 units available in the SIMS.
- Create a listing for Qty 2.
3. Listing close for 51.03% cost - De-allocate 2 units from "reserve"
status recovery - Evaluate cost recovery rate. Increase quantity to 3 units.
- Allocate 3 units to "reserve" status leaving 3 units available in the SIMS.
- Create a listing for Qty 3.
4. Listing close for 41.22% cost - De-allocate 3 units from "reserve"
status.
recovery - Evaluate cost recovery rate. Keep quantity of 3.
- Allocate 3 units to "reserve" status leaving 0 units available in the SIMS.
- Create a listing for Qty 3.
Listing close for 41.22% cost - De-allocate 3 units from "reserve" status.
recovery - Evaluate cost recovery rate. Keep quantity of 3.
- Check available quantity.
- No More Quantity. Stop.
Table 2 Referring to Fig. 7, the customer can control the following variables by static input (i.e., no logic need be used to derive the settings), at the SKU, category, and site level, using a business rules default page 46.
Opening Time (Hour/Min) Closing Time (Hour/Min) Bid Increment Opening Bid Duration (Days) Rest Period
Table 1 Step Input SIMS Action 1. Upload nine (9) 8pc. Venetian - Create a test listing of quantity 1.
Scallop Towels ¨ White - Allocate 1 unit to "reserve" status leaving 8 units available in the SIMS.
2. Test listing closes for 69.76% - De-allocate 1 unit from "reserve"
status, since cost recovery. item is sold.
- Evaluate cost recovery rate. Based on business rules increase quantity to 2 units.
- Allocate 2 units to "reserve" status leaving 6 units available in the SIMS.
- Create a listing for Qty 2.
3. Listing close for 51.03% cost - De-allocate 2 units from "reserve"
status recovery - Evaluate cost recovery rate. Increase quantity to 3 units.
- Allocate 3 units to "reserve" status leaving 3 units available in the SIMS.
- Create a listing for Qty 3.
4. Listing close for 41.22% cost - De-allocate 3 units from "reserve"
status.
recovery - Evaluate cost recovery rate. Keep quantity of 3.
- Allocate 3 units to "reserve" status leaving 0 units available in the SIMS.
- Create a listing for Qty 3.
Listing close for 41.22% cost - De-allocate 3 units from "reserve" status.
recovery - Evaluate cost recovery rate. Keep quantity of 3.
- Check available quantity.
- No More Quantity. Stop.
Table 2 Referring to Fig. 7, the customer can control the following variables by static input (i.e., no logic need be used to derive the settings), at the SKU, category, and site level, using a business rules default page 46.
Opening Time (Hour/Min) Closing Time (Hour/Min) Bid Increment Opening Bid Duration (Days) Rest Period
8 Referring to Fig. 8, logic rules may be based on a set quantity and margin relationship using a business rules page 48. The logic can be set at the SKU, category, or site level.
Depending on the margin of one or more previous listings, the size of the next lot will change by either an absolute number or a relative percentage.
In order to maintain control over inventory, a stop rule can allow the customer to stipulate a condition where no more listings will be placed by the SIMS. The system can report on these items individually. The stop rule should work under at least the following conditions: stop at predetermined quantity, stop at target recovery rate, stop on predetermined date. This feature is designed to help eliminate poor'performing inventory. These items may then be moved from the SIMS and liquidated at $.30 on the cost dollar. Stop logic may be implemented to work at the site level only.
Referring to Fig. 9, in the event that a customer decides to move items out at certain velocity regardless of margins, the auction service provider can provide override (linear quantity) functionality, which can be accessed through an override control 50. For example, if there are 10,000 SKUs, the customer may simply list 500 item lots over the next 20 weeks at a default duration of one week each.
Referring to Fig. 10, to maintain the integrity of the SIMS both daily audit reports and customer request reports can be made available, such as through a reporting page 52. Daily reports can be available by SKU, category, and site that detail the performance of previous day's closing items. When the logic engine evaluates the next set of listing quantities, the margins should be stored in a flat file that can be rolled up by category and site. An example report is shown in Table 3.
Cost Recovery By Category By Day Base 6/1 6/2 6/3 6/4 6/5 6/6 6/7 6/8 6/9 6/10 Total Category Books 51% 50%
49% 48% 45% 50% 51% 60% 50% 52% 51%
computers 51% 51%
50% 49% 48% 45% 50% 51% 60% 50% 51%
seasonal 49% 51%
52% 48% 56% 50% 51% 51% 52% 42% 50%
Apparel- 51% 51%
50% 49% 48% 45% 50% 51% 60% 50% 51%
accessories Home 49% 51%
52% 48% 56% 50% 51% 51% 52% 42% 50%
assortment Auto- 51% 51%
50% 49% 48% 45% 50% 51% 60% 50% 51%
hardware electronics 49% 51%
52% 48% 56% 50% 51% 51% 52% 42% 50%
Toys 51% 51%
50% 49% 48% 45% 50% 51% 60% 50% 51%
Office 49% 51%
52% 48% 56% 50% 51% 51% 52% 42% 50%
Sports- 51% 51%
50% 49% 48% 45% 50% 51% 60% 50% 51%
Depending on the margin of one or more previous listings, the size of the next lot will change by either an absolute number or a relative percentage.
In order to maintain control over inventory, a stop rule can allow the customer to stipulate a condition where no more listings will be placed by the SIMS. The system can report on these items individually. The stop rule should work under at least the following conditions: stop at predetermined quantity, stop at target recovery rate, stop on predetermined date. This feature is designed to help eliminate poor'performing inventory. These items may then be moved from the SIMS and liquidated at $.30 on the cost dollar. Stop logic may be implemented to work at the site level only.
Referring to Fig. 9, in the event that a customer decides to move items out at certain velocity regardless of margins, the auction service provider can provide override (linear quantity) functionality, which can be accessed through an override control 50. For example, if there are 10,000 SKUs, the customer may simply list 500 item lots over the next 20 weeks at a default duration of one week each.
Referring to Fig. 10, to maintain the integrity of the SIMS both daily audit reports and customer request reports can be made available, such as through a reporting page 52. Daily reports can be available by SKU, category, and site that detail the performance of previous day's closing items. When the logic engine evaluates the next set of listing quantities, the margins should be stored in a flat file that can be rolled up by category and site. An example report is shown in Table 3.
Cost Recovery By Category By Day Base 6/1 6/2 6/3 6/4 6/5 6/6 6/7 6/8 6/9 6/10 Total Category Books 51% 50%
49% 48% 45% 50% 51% 60% 50% 52% 51%
computers 51% 51%
50% 49% 48% 45% 50% 51% 60% 50% 51%
seasonal 49% 51%
52% 48% 56% 50% 51% 51% 52% 42% 50%
Apparel- 51% 51%
50% 49% 48% 45% 50% 51% 60% 50% 51%
accessories Home 49% 51%
52% 48% 56% 50% 51% 51% 52% 42% 50%
assortment Auto- 51% 51%
50% 49% 48% 45% 50% 51% 60% 50% 51%
hardware electronics 49% 51%
52% 48% 56% 50% 51% 51% 52% 42% 50%
Toys 51% 51%
50% 49% 48% 45% 50% 51% 60% 50% 51%
Office 49% 51%
52% 48% 56% 50% 51% 51% 52% 42% 50%
Sports- 51% 51%
50% 49% 48% 45% 50% 51% 60% 50% 51%
9.
outdoors b2b-business 54% 51% 52% 48% 56% 50% 51% 51% 52% 42% 51%
Grand Total 51% 51% 51% 48% 51% 48% 51% 52% 55% 47% 50%
(All dates in 2001) Table 3 Exception reports can also be made available. This type of report will display the numbers of available items each day to help manage site breadth (see Table 4).
It can work by evaluating current inventory levels, the current velocity of that inventory, and forecasting item sales with the most recent information. This evaluation can be governed by the following relationships.
Number of Listings Remaining = Current Inventory / Current Lot Size Expected Sell Out Date = Number Of Listings Remaining * (Duration + Rest Period) +
Today's Date Item Open Per Day Base Category 6/1 6/2 6/3 6/4 6/5 6/6 6/7 6/8 6/9 6/10 Total Books 12 17 20 21 computers 16 14 15 17 seasonal 15 17 20 21 Apparel-accessories 14 17 20 21 18 19 20 23 16 22 190 home assattinent 21 24 29 30 26 27 29 33 23 21 263 auto-hardware 14 13 17 20 electronics 20 22 26 27 Toys 15 17 20 21 Office 12 15 17 20 sports-outdoors 12 9 17 20 b2b-business 17 20 21 18 Grand Total 168 185 222 236 223 223 229 247 207 193 2,132 (All dates in 2001) Table 4 A sales forecasting report can be made available as well (see Table 5). Based on the exception report and the margin reports, the sales forecast report can give estimates of future sales by category given current recovery rates and inventory supplies. This evaluation can be governed by the following relationship.
Forecast Sales = Audit Report * Exception Report * Average Cost by Category Forecasted Sales (Based on Past Recovery History) Base 6/1 6/2 6/3 6/4 6/5 6/6 6/7 6/8 6/9 6/10 Total Category books 54 77 90 95 81 86 90 104 72 68 computers 10000 8750 9375 10625 12500 13125 11250 11875 12500 14375 114375 seasonal 525 595 700 735 630 665 700 805 560 490 6405 apparel- 364 442 520 546 468 494 520 598 416 572 4940 accessories home 965 assot __ tinent auto-hardware electronics 2243 2542 2990 3140 2691 2841 2990 3439 2392 2243 27508 toys 315 357 420 441 378 399 420 483 office sports-outdoors b2b-business Grand Total (All dates in 2001, all amounts in dollars) Table 5 Referring to Fig. 11, an alternative illustrative embodiment of a SIMS
includes a product listing rule page 54 that can be reached through the item page and allows users to select between = three types of rules. The first type is an unspecified type, which allows the item to be treated according to default site or category rules. The second type is a scheduled allocation type, which allows the user to reach a scheduled allocation rule page 56. The third is a price optimization type, which can operate in much the same way as is presented above in connection with the embodiment of Figs. 1-10.
Referring to Fig. 12, the scheduled allocation page 56 includes a channel selection control 58, which enables a user to select a channel for which the rule is to be edited. This control can allow different rules to be created to operate simultaneously for different channels.
Using this control, a user can therefore simultaneously try to sell different numbers of items through different channels, using mode 1, mode 2, or a combination of the two.
For example, the user can attempt to sell a large number of items though its own web site using a price optimization rule and attempt to sell smaller quantities through third party systems using scheduled allocation rule.
Feedback can be provided within a channel and/or between channels. If listings on a first channel stop doing well, for example, the SIMS can reduce the lot size on that channel and increase it on one or more other channels. For instance, a user could create a rule that would cause listings to be generated on a home site for 20 days, and then cause the remaining inventory to be liquidated through an auction provider.
The scheduled allocation page includes a number of additional controls to specify scheduled allocation parameters, such as a listing type text box, start and end text boxes, a duration text box, a rest period text box, a reserve price text box, an initial price text box, and an initial quantity text box. A compound stop control is also provided to specify a stop condition.
Using the scheduled allocation page, a user can, for example, create a series of weekly eight-hour auction listings with identical predetermined opening and reserve prices, with listings being posted until all product is sold out. Although this type of liquidation schedule does not exhibit performance feedback, it is believed to provide a straightforward and useful way to schedule the liquidation of some types of lots of items.
Referring to Fig. 13, an item page 60 in this embodiment includes product information and a number of controls. These controls include a compound listing placement control 62 with a channel selection control and a submit button. The listing placement control allows the user to simply list one or more items through one of the channels.
Referring also to Fig. 14, an edit automatic listing settings link 64 in the item page 60 can lead the user to an automatic listings settings page 68. This page can allow users to reset or disable automatic rules for an item. Resetting the automatic rules will cause the system to ignore any previously-created listings the next time an automatic rule creates a listing for the item. This allows the item to start fresh with initial price settings rather than basing its price on a past price history. Disabling rules prevents listings from being created automatically, but does not delete item-level rules. The user can therefore undo this command to reinstate an automatic rule.
Referring also to Fig. 15, an edit item button 66 on the item page 60 can lead the user to an item edit page 70. This page includes a number of controls that allow the user to provide information about the item. This information can include item description items and sales parameters. The item description items can include a product name, an item number/SKU, an image location, a shipping weight, and a description. The sales parameters can include the quantity available, the retail price, the cost, and the target recovery rate.
The sales parameters can also include default auction durations, start prices and bid increments.
Referring to Fig. 16, a rules report can be used to summarize all of the rules for a series of items. This report can include links to the item pages and to the corresponding rules for those pages. Links can also be provided to a site listing rule page that allows the default site listing rule type to be set to use price optimization rules or scheduled allocation rules.
In the embodiment presented, users interact with the server via hypertext transfer protocol (HTTP) over the span of one or more network connections. But numerous other platform technologies could be used to implement part or all of the system, such as dedicated hardware devices or simpler programmable devices interconnected by wireless or analog networks. Connections between elements can be intermittent (e.g., e-mail connections) or indirect. The function and structure of the various elements shown can also be broken down in different ways than those shown in figures, with logic elements being combined, separated, or recast as appropriate. And while the system's user interface is based on software-based graphical user interface elements, these could be readily rearranged in a variety of ways, and the user interface could even include other implementation elements, such as physically actuated controls or auditory prompts. In addition, while the system's user interface elements are presented as displayed in pages, one of ordinary skill in the art would recognize that they could also be displayed in other types of display regions, such as screens, cards, or windows. And while the system is useful in liquidating surplus product inventory, it can also be used for other types of transactions for a variety of types of items, such as services or even intangible items.
The present invention has now been described in connection with a number of specific embodiments thereof. However, numerous modifications which are contemplated as falling within the scope of the present invention should now be apparent to those skilled in the art. It is therefore intended that the scope of the present invention be limited only by the scope of the claims appended hereto. In addition, the order of presentation of the claims should not be construed to limit the scope of any particular term in the claims.
What is claimed is:
outdoors b2b-business 54% 51% 52% 48% 56% 50% 51% 51% 52% 42% 51%
Grand Total 51% 51% 51% 48% 51% 48% 51% 52% 55% 47% 50%
(All dates in 2001) Table 3 Exception reports can also be made available. This type of report will display the numbers of available items each day to help manage site breadth (see Table 4).
It can work by evaluating current inventory levels, the current velocity of that inventory, and forecasting item sales with the most recent information. This evaluation can be governed by the following relationships.
Number of Listings Remaining = Current Inventory / Current Lot Size Expected Sell Out Date = Number Of Listings Remaining * (Duration + Rest Period) +
Today's Date Item Open Per Day Base Category 6/1 6/2 6/3 6/4 6/5 6/6 6/7 6/8 6/9 6/10 Total Books 12 17 20 21 computers 16 14 15 17 seasonal 15 17 20 21 Apparel-accessories 14 17 20 21 18 19 20 23 16 22 190 home assattinent 21 24 29 30 26 27 29 33 23 21 263 auto-hardware 14 13 17 20 electronics 20 22 26 27 Toys 15 17 20 21 Office 12 15 17 20 sports-outdoors 12 9 17 20 b2b-business 17 20 21 18 Grand Total 168 185 222 236 223 223 229 247 207 193 2,132 (All dates in 2001) Table 4 A sales forecasting report can be made available as well (see Table 5). Based on the exception report and the margin reports, the sales forecast report can give estimates of future sales by category given current recovery rates and inventory supplies. This evaluation can be governed by the following relationship.
Forecast Sales = Audit Report * Exception Report * Average Cost by Category Forecasted Sales (Based on Past Recovery History) Base 6/1 6/2 6/3 6/4 6/5 6/6 6/7 6/8 6/9 6/10 Total Category books 54 77 90 95 81 86 90 104 72 68 computers 10000 8750 9375 10625 12500 13125 11250 11875 12500 14375 114375 seasonal 525 595 700 735 630 665 700 805 560 490 6405 apparel- 364 442 520 546 468 494 520 598 416 572 4940 accessories home 965 assot __ tinent auto-hardware electronics 2243 2542 2990 3140 2691 2841 2990 3439 2392 2243 27508 toys 315 357 420 441 378 399 420 483 office sports-outdoors b2b-business Grand Total (All dates in 2001, all amounts in dollars) Table 5 Referring to Fig. 11, an alternative illustrative embodiment of a SIMS
includes a product listing rule page 54 that can be reached through the item page and allows users to select between = three types of rules. The first type is an unspecified type, which allows the item to be treated according to default site or category rules. The second type is a scheduled allocation type, which allows the user to reach a scheduled allocation rule page 56. The third is a price optimization type, which can operate in much the same way as is presented above in connection with the embodiment of Figs. 1-10.
Referring to Fig. 12, the scheduled allocation page 56 includes a channel selection control 58, which enables a user to select a channel for which the rule is to be edited. This control can allow different rules to be created to operate simultaneously for different channels.
Using this control, a user can therefore simultaneously try to sell different numbers of items through different channels, using mode 1, mode 2, or a combination of the two.
For example, the user can attempt to sell a large number of items though its own web site using a price optimization rule and attempt to sell smaller quantities through third party systems using scheduled allocation rule.
Feedback can be provided within a channel and/or between channels. If listings on a first channel stop doing well, for example, the SIMS can reduce the lot size on that channel and increase it on one or more other channels. For instance, a user could create a rule that would cause listings to be generated on a home site for 20 days, and then cause the remaining inventory to be liquidated through an auction provider.
The scheduled allocation page includes a number of additional controls to specify scheduled allocation parameters, such as a listing type text box, start and end text boxes, a duration text box, a rest period text box, a reserve price text box, an initial price text box, and an initial quantity text box. A compound stop control is also provided to specify a stop condition.
Using the scheduled allocation page, a user can, for example, create a series of weekly eight-hour auction listings with identical predetermined opening and reserve prices, with listings being posted until all product is sold out. Although this type of liquidation schedule does not exhibit performance feedback, it is believed to provide a straightforward and useful way to schedule the liquidation of some types of lots of items.
Referring to Fig. 13, an item page 60 in this embodiment includes product information and a number of controls. These controls include a compound listing placement control 62 with a channel selection control and a submit button. The listing placement control allows the user to simply list one or more items through one of the channels.
Referring also to Fig. 14, an edit automatic listing settings link 64 in the item page 60 can lead the user to an automatic listings settings page 68. This page can allow users to reset or disable automatic rules for an item. Resetting the automatic rules will cause the system to ignore any previously-created listings the next time an automatic rule creates a listing for the item. This allows the item to start fresh with initial price settings rather than basing its price on a past price history. Disabling rules prevents listings from being created automatically, but does not delete item-level rules. The user can therefore undo this command to reinstate an automatic rule.
Referring also to Fig. 15, an edit item button 66 on the item page 60 can lead the user to an item edit page 70. This page includes a number of controls that allow the user to provide information about the item. This information can include item description items and sales parameters. The item description items can include a product name, an item number/SKU, an image location, a shipping weight, and a description. The sales parameters can include the quantity available, the retail price, the cost, and the target recovery rate.
The sales parameters can also include default auction durations, start prices and bid increments.
Referring to Fig. 16, a rules report can be used to summarize all of the rules for a series of items. This report can include links to the item pages and to the corresponding rules for those pages. Links can also be provided to a site listing rule page that allows the default site listing rule type to be set to use price optimization rules or scheduled allocation rules.
In the embodiment presented, users interact with the server via hypertext transfer protocol (HTTP) over the span of one or more network connections. But numerous other platform technologies could be used to implement part or all of the system, such as dedicated hardware devices or simpler programmable devices interconnected by wireless or analog networks. Connections between elements can be intermittent (e.g., e-mail connections) or indirect. The function and structure of the various elements shown can also be broken down in different ways than those shown in figures, with logic elements being combined, separated, or recast as appropriate. And while the system's user interface is based on software-based graphical user interface elements, these could be readily rearranged in a variety of ways, and the user interface could even include other implementation elements, such as physically actuated controls or auditory prompts. In addition, while the system's user interface elements are presented as displayed in pages, one of ordinary skill in the art would recognize that they could also be displayed in other types of display regions, such as screens, cards, or windows. And while the system is useful in liquidating surplus product inventory, it can also be used for other types of transactions for a variety of types of items, such as services or even intangible items.
The present invention has now been described in connection with a number of specific embodiments thereof. However, numerous modifications which are contemplated as falling within the scope of the present invention should now be apparent to those skilled in the art. It is therefore intended that the scope of the present invention be limited only by the scope of the claims appended hereto. In addition, the order of presentation of the claims should not be construed to limit the scope of any particular term in the claims.
What is claimed is:
Claims (38)
1. A sales system for offering lots of items for sale, comprising:
one or more processors; and memory comprising business rule definition logic and offering creation logic, the offering creation logic being responsive to the business rule definition logic and operative, using the one or more processors, to dynamically create a plurality of different offerings for items in the lots, and the offering creation logic is further operative to optimize return based on one or more business rules defined by the business rule definition logic based on a target cost recovery rate by using different offering parameter values to create the plurality of different offerings, the plurality of different offerings being stored in a temporary memory within the system prior to distributing the plurality of different offerings to one or more channels.
one or more processors; and memory comprising business rule definition logic and offering creation logic, the offering creation logic being responsive to the business rule definition logic and operative, using the one or more processors, to dynamically create a plurality of different offerings for items in the lots, and the offering creation logic is further operative to optimize return based on one or more business rules defined by the business rule definition logic based on a target cost recovery rate by using different offering parameter values to create the plurality of different offerings, the plurality of different offerings being stored in a temporary memory within the system prior to distributing the plurality of different offerings to one or more channels.
2. The system of claim 1 wherein the business rule definition logic is responsive to user business rule creation commands.
3. The system of claim 1 wherein the offering creation logic is operative to optimize return by adjusting lot price.
4. The system of claim 1 wherein the offering creation logic is operative to optimize return by adjusting lot quantity.
5. The system of claim I wherein the offering creation logic is operative to create offerings for a plurality of sales channels.
6. The system of claim 5 wherein the offering creation logic is operative to adjust offerings on one of the sales channels based on results from another of the sales channels.
7. The system of claim 1 wherein the business rule definition logic is operative to create rules that are dependent on results from prior offerings.
8. The system of claim 7 wherein the business rule definition logic is operative to create rules that are dependent on margins from prior offerings.
9. The system of claim 7 wherein the price offering creation logic is operative to create a series of auctions based on parameters determined by results from previous auctions.
10. The system of claim 1 wherein the business rule definition logic is operative to create offerings based on absolute or relative amounts.
11. The system of claim 1 wherein the business rule definition logic employs a web-based interface.
12. The system of claim 1 wherein the business rules can be set on a SKU, category, and site level.
13. The system of claim 1 further including default sales parameter creation logic operative to set sales parameters for the offerings.
14. The system of claim 13 wherein the sales parameter creation logic is operative to set bidding parameters for an auction.
15. The system of claim 1 wherein the price offering creation logic uses exponential smoothing to derive parameters for the price offerings.
16. The system of claim 1 further including search logic operative to search for items in the lots.
17. The system of claim 1 further including falling price default logic operative to create fixed default falling price parameters.
18. The system of claim 1 further including scheduled allocation logic operative to create a scheduled set of offerings with predetermined parameters.
19. The system of claim 1 further including item display logic operative to display information about items in each of the lots with controls that allow a user to access the business rule definition logic for the item in the lot for which information is displayed.
20. The system of claim 1 further including a forecasting report generator operative to produce a report that forecasts future operation of the offering creation logic.
21. A method of offering lots of items for sale, comprising:
defining machine-readable business rules based on a target cost recovery rate;
and automatically creating, using one or more processors, a plurality of different offerings for items in the lots based on the machine-readable business rules, the step of automatically creating to optimize return based on the machine-readable business rules using different offering parameter values to create the plurality of different offerings, the step of automatically creating including temporarily storing the plurality of different offerings in a memory within the system prior to distributing the plurality of different offerings to one or more channels.
defining machine-readable business rules based on a target cost recovery rate;
and automatically creating, using one or more processors, a plurality of different offerings for items in the lots based on the machine-readable business rules, the step of automatically creating to optimize return based on the machine-readable business rules using different offering parameter values to create the plurality of different offerings, the step of automatically creating including temporarily storing the plurality of different offerings in a memory within the system prior to distributing the plurality of different offerings to one or more channels.
22. The method of claim 21 wherein the step of automatically creating to optimize return comprises adjusting lot price.
23. The method of claim 21 wherein the step of automatically creating to optimize return comprises adjusting lot quantity.
24. The method of claim 21 wherein the step of automatically creating the plurality of different offerings comprises creating offerings for a plurality of sales channels.
25. The method of claim 21 further comprising adjusting offerings on one of the sales channels based on results from another of the sales channels.
26. The method of claim 21 further comprising creating rules that are dependent on results from prior offerings.
27. The method of claim 26 wherein the step of creating rules comprises creating rules that are dependent on margins from prior offerings.
28. The method of claim 26 further comprising creating a series of auctions based on parameters determined by results from previous auctions.
29. The method of claim 21 further comprising creating offerings based on absolute or relative amounts.
30. The method of claim 21 wherein the step of defining the machine-readable business rules comprises setting the business rules on a SKU, category, and site level.
31. The method of claim 21 further comprising setting sales parameters for the offerings.
32. The method of claim 31 further comprising setting bidding parameters for an auction.
33. The method of claim 21 further comprising deriving parameters for the offerings using exponential smoothing.
34. The method of claim 21 further comprising creating fixed default falling price parameters.
35. The method of claim 21 further comprising creating a scheduled set of offerings with predetermined parameters.
36. The method of claim 21 further comprising displaying information about items in each of the lots with controls that allow a user to access business rule definition logic for the item in the lot for which information is displayed.
37. The method of claim 21 further comprising producing a report that forecasts future operation of the offering creation logic.
38. A computer-readable medium storing statements and instructions for execution by a processor to perform the method of any one of claims 21 to 37.
Applications Claiming Priority (3)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US30682801P | 2001-07-20 | 2001-07-20 | |
US60/306,828 | 2001-07-20 | ||
PCT/US2002/023289 WO2003009105A2 (en) | 2001-07-20 | 2002-07-22 | Automated listing management |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
CA2455639A1 CA2455639A1 (en) | 2003-01-30 |
CA2455639C true CA2455639C (en) | 2016-08-16 |
Family
ID=23187040
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
CA2455639A Expired - Lifetime CA2455639C (en) | 2001-07-20 | 2002-07-22 | Automated listing management |
Country Status (6)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (3) | US7883002B2 (en) |
EP (1) | EP1417619A4 (en) |
CN (1) | CN1628307A (en) |
AU (1) | AU2002355130B2 (en) |
CA (1) | CA2455639C (en) |
WO (1) | WO2003009105A2 (en) |
Families Citing this family (81)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US6243691B1 (en) * | 1996-03-29 | 2001-06-05 | Onsale, Inc. | Method and system for processing and transmitting electronic auction information |
US6850037B2 (en) | 1997-11-03 | 2005-02-01 | Midtronics, Inc. | In-vehicle battery monitor |
US8872517B2 (en) | 1996-07-29 | 2014-10-28 | Midtronics, Inc. | Electronic battery tester with battery age input |
US8198900B2 (en) | 1996-07-29 | 2012-06-12 | Midtronics, Inc. | Automotive battery charging system tester |
US6566883B1 (en) | 1999-11-01 | 2003-05-20 | Midtronics, Inc. | Electronic battery tester |
US8958998B2 (en) * | 1997-11-03 | 2015-02-17 | Midtronics, Inc. | Electronic battery tester with network communication |
US7705602B2 (en) | 1997-11-03 | 2010-04-27 | Midtronics, Inc. | Automotive vehicle electrical system diagnostic device |
US8601373B1 (en) | 1999-11-16 | 2013-12-03 | Ebay Inc. | Network-based sales system with customizable user interface |
US7446536B2 (en) * | 2000-03-27 | 2008-11-04 | Midtronics, Inc. | Scan tool for electronic battery tester |
US7398176B2 (en) | 2000-03-27 | 2008-07-08 | Midtronics, Inc. | Battery testers with secondary functionality |
US7860776B1 (en) * | 2000-10-11 | 2010-12-28 | Ebay Inc. | Sales system with buyer price selection |
WO2003009105A2 (en) * | 2001-07-20 | 2003-01-30 | Fairmarket, Inc. | Automated listing management |
US7149744B1 (en) * | 2001-09-27 | 2006-12-12 | I2 Technologies Us, Inc. | Third party document storage and reuse |
US7593866B2 (en) * | 2002-12-31 | 2009-09-22 | Ebay Inc. | Introducing a fixed-price transaction mechanism in conjunction with an auction transaction mechanism |
US7904346B2 (en) * | 2002-12-31 | 2011-03-08 | Ebay Inc. | Method and system to adjust a seller fixed price offer |
WO2005017687A2 (en) * | 2003-08-04 | 2005-02-24 | Ebay Inc. | Deploying high-volume listings in a network trading platform |
US7154276B2 (en) | 2003-09-05 | 2006-12-26 | Midtronics, Inc. | Method and apparatus for measuring a parameter of a vehicle electrical system |
US9255955B2 (en) | 2003-09-05 | 2016-02-09 | Midtronics, Inc. | Method and apparatus for measuring a parameter of a vehicle electrical system |
US8164343B2 (en) | 2003-09-05 | 2012-04-24 | Midtronics, Inc. | Method and apparatus for measuring a parameter of a vehicle electrical system |
US9018958B2 (en) | 2003-09-05 | 2015-04-28 | Midtronics, Inc. | Method and apparatus for measuring a parameter of a vehicle electrical system |
US7707074B1 (en) * | 2003-09-08 | 2010-04-27 | Accenture Global Services Gmbh | Online marketplace channel access |
US7676397B2 (en) * | 2003-12-03 | 2010-03-09 | Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. | Method and system for predicting the outcome of an online auction |
US7783555B2 (en) * | 2003-12-11 | 2010-08-24 | Ebay Inc. | Auction with interest rate bidding |
US20050171858A1 (en) * | 2004-02-03 | 2005-08-04 | Conduct Prosecution To Exclusion Inventors | Multi-vendor online marketplace |
US20050197946A1 (en) * | 2004-03-05 | 2005-09-08 | Chris Williams | Product data file for online marketplace sales channels |
US7769640B2 (en) | 2004-03-05 | 2010-08-03 | Accenture Global Services Gmbh | Strategies for online marketplace sales channels |
US20050234804A1 (en) * | 2004-04-16 | 2005-10-20 | Yue Fang | Method and system for auto-mapping to network-based auctions |
US7877313B2 (en) * | 2004-04-16 | 2011-01-25 | Sap Ag | Method and system for a failure recovery framework for interfacing with network-based auctions |
US7788160B2 (en) * | 2004-04-16 | 2010-08-31 | Sap Ag | Method and system for configurable options in enhanced network-based auctions |
US7860749B2 (en) * | 2004-04-16 | 2010-12-28 | Sap Ag | Method, medium and system for customizable homepages for network-based auctions |
US9496720B2 (en) | 2004-08-20 | 2016-11-15 | Midtronics, Inc. | System for automatically gathering battery information |
US8442877B2 (en) * | 2004-08-20 | 2013-05-14 | Midtronics, Inc. | Simplification of inventory management |
US8344685B2 (en) | 2004-08-20 | 2013-01-01 | Midtronics, Inc. | System for automatically gathering battery information |
US8436619B2 (en) | 2004-08-20 | 2013-05-07 | Midtronics, Inc. | Integrated tag reader and environment sensor |
US20060143109A1 (en) | 2004-12-23 | 2006-06-29 | Ebay Inc. | Method and system of listing an item in a fixed-price section |
JP2007055786A (en) * | 2005-08-26 | 2007-03-08 | Konica Minolta Business Technologies Inc | Paper feeding device and image forming device |
US8095428B2 (en) * | 2005-10-31 | 2012-01-10 | Sap Ag | Method, system, and medium for winning bid evaluation in an auction |
US20070143205A1 (en) * | 2005-10-31 | 2007-06-21 | Sap Ag | Method and system for implementing configurable order options for integrated auction services on a seller's e-commerce site |
US7895115B2 (en) * | 2005-10-31 | 2011-02-22 | Sap Ag | Method and system for implementing multiple auctions for a product on a seller's E-commerce site |
US20070106595A1 (en) * | 2005-10-31 | 2007-05-10 | Sap Ag | Monitoring tool for integrated product ordering/fulfillment center and auction system |
US7835977B2 (en) * | 2005-11-03 | 2010-11-16 | Sap Ag | Method and system for generating an auction using a template in an integrated internal auction system |
US8095449B2 (en) * | 2005-11-03 | 2012-01-10 | Sap Ag | Method and system for generating an auction using a product catalog in an integrated internal auction system |
US20080059283A1 (en) * | 2006-08-31 | 2008-03-06 | Ebay Inc. | Method and system for opportunity distribution |
US20080316752A1 (en) * | 2006-12-12 | 2008-12-25 | David Richard Kostuch | Clarifying filter |
US8306690B2 (en) | 2007-07-17 | 2012-11-06 | Midtronics, Inc. | Battery tester for electric vehicle |
US9274157B2 (en) | 2007-07-17 | 2016-03-01 | Midtronics, Inc. | Battery tester for electric vehicle |
US8152606B2 (en) * | 2008-06-19 | 2012-04-10 | John Richard Jamison | Skinning knife |
US9588185B2 (en) | 2010-02-25 | 2017-03-07 | Keith S. Champlin | Method and apparatus for detecting cell deterioration in an electrochemical cell or battery |
CN102804478B (en) * | 2010-03-03 | 2015-12-16 | 密特电子公司 | For the watch-dog of front terminals battery |
US9229062B2 (en) | 2010-05-27 | 2016-01-05 | Midtronics, Inc. | Electronic storage battery diagnostic system |
DE112011101892T5 (en) | 2010-06-03 | 2013-03-21 | Midtronics, Inc. | Battery pack maintenance for electric vehicles |
US8738309B2 (en) | 2010-09-30 | 2014-05-27 | Midtronics, Inc. | Battery pack maintenance for electric vehicles |
US11740294B2 (en) | 2010-06-03 | 2023-08-29 | Midtronics, Inc. | High use battery pack maintenance |
US10046649B2 (en) | 2012-06-28 | 2018-08-14 | Midtronics, Inc. | Hybrid and electric vehicle battery pack maintenance device |
US9419311B2 (en) | 2010-06-18 | 2016-08-16 | Midtronics, Inc. | Battery maintenance device with thermal buffer |
US9201120B2 (en) | 2010-08-12 | 2015-12-01 | Midtronics, Inc. | Electronic battery tester for testing storage battery |
DE112012004706T5 (en) | 2011-11-10 | 2014-08-21 | Midtronics, Inc. | Battery pack test device |
US9851411B2 (en) | 2012-06-28 | 2017-12-26 | Keith S. Champlin | Suppressing HF cable oscillations during dynamic measurements of cells and batteries |
US11325479B2 (en) | 2012-06-28 | 2022-05-10 | Midtronics, Inc. | Hybrid and electric vehicle battery maintenance device |
US11257125B2 (en) | 2012-12-10 | 2022-02-22 | Capital One Services, Llc | System and method for providing advertiser auctions based on segmentation informed by purchase data |
US9795997B2 (en) * | 2013-03-15 | 2017-10-24 | United States Postal Service | Systems, methods and devices for item processing |
US9244100B2 (en) | 2013-03-15 | 2016-01-26 | Midtronics, Inc. | Current clamp with jaw closure detection |
US9312575B2 (en) | 2013-05-16 | 2016-04-12 | Midtronics, Inc. | Battery testing system and method |
TWI574168B (en) * | 2013-07-26 | 2017-03-11 | 網路家庭國際資訊股份有限公司 | Database system |
US10843574B2 (en) | 2013-12-12 | 2020-11-24 | Midtronics, Inc. | Calibration and programming of in-vehicle battery sensors |
EP2897229A1 (en) | 2014-01-16 | 2015-07-22 | Midtronics, Inc. | Battery clamp with endoskeleton design |
US10473555B2 (en) | 2014-07-14 | 2019-11-12 | Midtronics, Inc. | Automotive maintenance system |
US10222397B2 (en) | 2014-09-26 | 2019-03-05 | Midtronics, Inc. | Cable connector for electronic battery tester |
WO2016123075A1 (en) | 2015-01-26 | 2016-08-04 | Midtronics, Inc. | Alternator tester |
US9966676B2 (en) | 2015-09-28 | 2018-05-08 | Midtronics, Inc. | Kelvin connector adapter for storage battery |
US10608353B2 (en) | 2016-06-28 | 2020-03-31 | Midtronics, Inc. | Battery clamp |
US11054480B2 (en) | 2016-10-25 | 2021-07-06 | Midtronics, Inc. | Electrical load for electronic battery tester and electronic battery tester including such electrical load |
US11513160B2 (en) | 2018-11-29 | 2022-11-29 | Midtronics, Inc. | Vehicle battery maintenance device |
US11566972B2 (en) | 2019-07-31 | 2023-01-31 | Midtronics, Inc. | Tire tread gauge using visual indicator |
US11545839B2 (en) | 2019-11-05 | 2023-01-03 | Midtronics, Inc. | System for charging a series of connected batteries |
US11668779B2 (en) | 2019-11-11 | 2023-06-06 | Midtronics, Inc. | Hybrid and electric vehicle battery pack maintenance device |
US11474153B2 (en) | 2019-11-12 | 2022-10-18 | Midtronics, Inc. | Battery pack maintenance system |
US11486930B2 (en) | 2020-01-23 | 2022-11-01 | Midtronics, Inc. | Electronic battery tester with battery clamp storage holsters |
US11694218B2 (en) | 2020-06-25 | 2023-07-04 | Mercari, Inc. | Computer technology for automated pricing guidance |
US11393013B2 (en) * | 2020-06-25 | 2022-07-19 | Mercari, Inc. | Method, non-transitory computer-readable device, and system for intelligent listing creation |
CN112800720A (en) * | 2021-01-19 | 2021-05-14 | 深圳市墨工智云科技有限公司 | System supporting automatic generation of SKU model and model selection of multi-parameter product |
Family Cites Families (152)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US4853882A (en) * | 1987-11-02 | 1989-08-01 | A. C. Nielsen Company | System and method for protecting against redundant mailings |
US4972318A (en) | 1988-09-09 | 1990-11-20 | Iron City Sash & Door Company | Order entry and inventory control method |
US5109482A (en) * | 1989-01-11 | 1992-04-28 | David Bohrman | Interactive video control system for displaying user-selectable clips |
US4992940A (en) * | 1989-03-13 | 1991-02-12 | H-Renee, Incorporated | System and method for automated selection of equipment for purchase through input of user desired specifications |
US5172314A (en) | 1991-05-03 | 1992-12-15 | Electronic Retailing Systems International | Apparatus for communicating price changes including printer and display devices |
US5978811A (en) * | 1992-07-29 | 1999-11-02 | Texas Instruments Incorporated | Information repository system and method for modeling data |
US7133834B1 (en) * | 1992-08-06 | 2006-11-07 | Ferrara Ethereal Llc | Product value information interchange server |
US6181335B1 (en) * | 1992-12-09 | 2001-01-30 | Discovery Communications, Inc. | Card for a set top terminal |
US5404528A (en) * | 1993-01-19 | 1995-04-04 | Canon Information Systems, Inc. | Scripting system |
AU1333895A (en) * | 1993-11-30 | 1995-06-19 | Raymond R. Burke | Computer system for allowing a consumer to purchase packaged goods at home |
US5664111A (en) * | 1994-02-16 | 1997-09-02 | Honicorp, Inc. | Computerized, multimedia, network, real time, interactive marketing and transactional system |
US5694549A (en) * | 1994-03-03 | 1997-12-02 | Telescan, Inc. | Multi-provider on-line communications system |
US5745882A (en) * | 1995-01-09 | 1998-04-28 | Us West Marketing Resources Group, Inc. | Electronic classified advertising interface method and instructions with continuous search notification |
US6658568B1 (en) * | 1995-02-13 | 2003-12-02 | Intertrust Technologies Corporation | Trusted infrastructure support system, methods and techniques for secure electronic commerce transaction and rights management |
US5845265A (en) * | 1995-04-26 | 1998-12-01 | Mercexchange, L.L.C. | Consignment nodes |
US7937312B1 (en) * | 1995-04-26 | 2011-05-03 | Ebay Inc. | Facilitating electronic commerce transactions through binding offers |
US5640569A (en) * | 1995-04-28 | 1997-06-17 | Sun Microsystems, Inc. | Diverse goods arbitration system and method for allocating resources in a distributed computer system |
US5701137A (en) * | 1995-05-24 | 1997-12-23 | Microsoft Corporation | Method for separating a hierarchical tree control into one or more hierarchical child tree controls in a graphical user interface |
US5652850A (en) * | 1995-06-07 | 1997-07-29 | Ast Research, Inc. | Panel creation engine using templates to automatically configure user interface screeen displays |
US5826244A (en) * | 1995-08-23 | 1998-10-20 | Xerox Corporation | Method and system for providing a document service over a computer network using an automated brokered auction |
US5710887A (en) * | 1995-08-29 | 1998-01-20 | Broadvision | Computer system and method for electronic commerce |
US6473609B1 (en) * | 1995-12-11 | 2002-10-29 | Openwave Systems Inc. | Method and architecture for interactive two-way communication devices to interact with a network |
US5924077A (en) * | 1995-12-29 | 1999-07-13 | Sapient Solutions, Llc | Computer based system for monitoring and processing data collected at the point of sale of goods and services |
US5905975A (en) * | 1996-01-04 | 1999-05-18 | Ausubel; Lawrence M. | Computer implemented methods and apparatus for auctions |
US6125356A (en) | 1996-01-18 | 2000-09-26 | Rosefaire Development, Ltd. | Portable sales presentation system with selective scripted seller prompts |
US6182053B1 (en) * | 1996-03-26 | 2001-01-30 | Recovery Sales Corporation | Method and apparatus for managing inventory |
US6243691B1 (en) * | 1996-03-29 | 2001-06-05 | Onsale, Inc. | Method and system for processing and transmitting electronic auction information |
US5835896A (en) * | 1996-03-29 | 1998-11-10 | Onsale, Inc. | Method and system for processing and transmitting electronic auction information |
US5809242A (en) * | 1996-04-19 | 1998-09-15 | Juno Online Services, L.P. | Electronic mail system for displaying advertisement at local computer received from remote system while the local computer is off-line the remote system |
US5894554A (en) * | 1996-04-23 | 1999-04-13 | Infospinner, Inc. | System for managing dynamic web page generation requests by intercepting request at web server and routing to page server thereby releasing web server to process other requests |
US6704713B1 (en) * | 1996-05-23 | 2004-03-09 | Ita Investments, Llc | Computer controlled event ticket auctioning system |
US6125352A (en) * | 1996-06-28 | 2000-09-26 | Microsoft Corporation | System and method for conducting commerce over a distributed network |
US5890138A (en) * | 1996-08-26 | 1999-03-30 | Bid.Com International Inc. | Computer auction system |
US6356878B1 (en) * | 1996-09-04 | 2002-03-12 | Priceline.Com Incorporated | Conditional purchase offer buyer agency system |
US6253188B1 (en) * | 1996-09-20 | 2001-06-26 | Thomson Newspapers, Inc. | Automated interactive classified ad system for the internet |
US7145898B1 (en) * | 1996-11-18 | 2006-12-05 | Mci Communications Corporation | System, method and article of manufacture for selecting a gateway of a hybrid communication system architecture |
US6754181B1 (en) * | 1996-11-18 | 2004-06-22 | Mci Communications Corporation | System and method for a directory service supporting a hybrid communication system architecture |
US5784539A (en) * | 1996-11-26 | 1998-07-21 | Client-Server-Networking Solutions, Inc. | Quality driven expert system |
US6041310A (en) * | 1996-12-12 | 2000-03-21 | Green Ford, Inc. | Method and system for automobile transactions |
JPH10200575A (en) * | 1997-01-08 | 1998-07-31 | Fujitsu Ltd | On-line shopping system |
US6470389B1 (en) * | 1997-03-14 | 2002-10-22 | Lucent Technologies Inc. | Hosting a network service on a cluster of servers using a single-address image |
US6052667A (en) * | 1997-03-21 | 2000-04-18 | Walker Digital, Llc | Method and apparatus for selling an aging food product as a substitute for an ordered product |
US6401080B1 (en) * | 1997-03-21 | 2002-06-04 | International Business Machines Corporation | Intelligent agent with negotiation capability and method of negotiation therewith |
US5999937A (en) | 1997-06-06 | 1999-12-07 | Madison Information Technologies, Inc. | System and method for converting data between data sets |
US6029141A (en) * | 1997-06-27 | 2000-02-22 | Amazon.Com, Inc. | Internet-based customer referral system |
US6731729B2 (en) * | 1997-08-29 | 2004-05-04 | Arbinet-Thexchange, Inc. | Method and a system for settlement of trading accounts |
US6484149B1 (en) * | 1997-10-10 | 2002-11-19 | Microsoft Corporation | Systems and methods for viewing product information, and methods for generating web pages |
US6055519A (en) * | 1997-10-11 | 2000-04-25 | I2 Technologies, Inc. | Framework for negotiation and tracking of sale of goods |
US6032153A (en) * | 1997-11-13 | 2000-02-29 | Electric Data Systems Corporation | Method and system for maintaining persistence in a shared object system |
US5991739A (en) * | 1997-11-24 | 1999-11-23 | Food.Com | Internet online order method and apparatus |
US6385618B1 (en) * | 1997-12-22 | 2002-05-07 | Sun Microsystems, Inc. | Integrating both modifications to an object model and modifications to a database into source code by an object-relational mapping tool |
US6396830B2 (en) * | 1998-06-18 | 2002-05-28 | Lucent Technologies Inc. | Implementing network services over the internet through dynamic resolution of personal host names |
US6295058B1 (en) * | 1998-07-22 | 2001-09-25 | Sony Corporation | Method and apparatus for creating multimedia electronic mail messages or greeting cards on an interactive receiver |
US7558752B1 (en) * | 1998-08-07 | 2009-07-07 | Ariba, Inc. | Method and an apparatus for a trading market design and deployment system |
WO2000008578A1 (en) | 1998-08-07 | 2000-02-17 | Trading Dynamics, Inc. | A method and an apparatus for a universal trading market design and deployment system |
US6285989B1 (en) * | 1998-08-07 | 2001-09-04 | Ariba, Inc. | Universal on-line trading market design and deployment system |
US6226618B1 (en) * | 1998-08-13 | 2001-05-01 | International Business Machines Corporation | Electronic content delivery system |
US6898762B2 (en) * | 1998-08-21 | 2005-05-24 | United Video Properties, Inc. | Client-server electronic program guide |
AU5898099A (en) * | 1998-08-25 | 2000-03-14 | Accompany Inc. | On-line marketing system and method |
US6473748B1 (en) * | 1998-08-31 | 2002-10-29 | Worldcom, Inc. | System for implementing rules |
AU6049999A (en) * | 1998-09-17 | 2000-04-03 | Nexchange Corporation | Affiliate commerce system and method |
US6314424B1 (en) * | 1998-09-28 | 2001-11-06 | International Business Machines Corporation | System and method for dynamically expanding and collapsing a tree view for an HTML web interface |
US6058417A (en) * | 1998-10-23 | 2000-05-02 | Ebay Inc. | Information presentation and management in an online trading environment |
US7236983B1 (en) | 1998-11-09 | 2007-06-26 | Chrome Data Corporation | Hierarchical data structure for vehicle identification and configuration data including protected customer data |
US6134548A (en) * | 1998-11-19 | 2000-10-17 | Ac Properties B.V. | System, method and article of manufacture for advanced mobile bargain shopping |
US6260024B1 (en) * | 1998-12-02 | 2001-07-10 | Gary Shkedy | Method and apparatus for facilitating buyer-driven purchase orders on a commercial network system |
US6434536B1 (en) * | 1998-12-23 | 2002-08-13 | Timothy S. Geiger | Methods and systems for commerce |
US6272472B1 (en) * | 1998-12-29 | 2001-08-07 | Intel Corporation | Dynamic linking of supplier web sites to reseller web sites |
US7020632B1 (en) * | 1999-01-11 | 2006-03-28 | Lawrence Kohls | Trading system for fixed-value contracts |
US6584451B1 (en) * | 1999-01-12 | 2003-06-24 | Ariba, Inc. | Facilitator for aggregating buyer power in an on-line market system |
US8005731B1 (en) | 1999-01-14 | 2011-08-23 | Autobytel.Com, Inc. | Real time vehicle purchase request management method and system |
US6598026B1 (en) * | 1999-01-25 | 2003-07-22 | Nextag.Com, Inc. | Methods and apparatus for brokering transactions |
US6393427B1 (en) * | 1999-03-22 | 2002-05-21 | Nec Usa, Inc. | Personalized navigation trees |
US6101484A (en) * | 1999-03-31 | 2000-08-08 | Mercata, Inc. | Dynamic market equilibrium management system, process and article of manufacture |
US7010511B1 (en) * | 1999-03-31 | 2006-03-07 | Kinney Jr Sam E | Method and system for conducting electronic auctions with net present value bidding |
US6993504B1 (en) * | 1999-04-09 | 2006-01-31 | Trading Technologies International, Inc. | User interface for semi-fungible trading |
CA2304293A1 (en) * | 1999-04-09 | 2000-10-09 | Bob Bornhofen | Method and system for the issuance of instant credit |
US6496568B1 (en) * | 1999-04-12 | 2002-12-17 | Avaya Technology Corp. | Method and apparatus for providing automated notification to a customer of a real-time notification system |
US6516301B1 (en) * | 1999-05-03 | 2003-02-04 | Lucent Technologies Inc. | Order-based material management system |
US7315826B1 (en) * | 1999-05-27 | 2008-01-01 | Accenture, Llp | Comparatively analyzing vendors of components required for a web-based architecture |
US7165041B1 (en) * | 1999-05-27 | 2007-01-16 | Accenture, Llp | Web-based architecture sales tool |
US6721713B1 (en) * | 1999-05-27 | 2004-04-13 | Andersen Consulting Llp | Business alliance identification in a web architecture framework |
US6564192B1 (en) * | 1999-06-08 | 2003-05-13 | Freemarkets, Inc. | Method and system for differential index bidding in online auctions |
US6629082B1 (en) * | 1999-06-15 | 2003-09-30 | W.R. Hambrecht & Co. | Auction system and method for pricing and allocation during capital formation |
US6064981A (en) * | 1999-06-17 | 2000-05-16 | Barni; Neil A. | Method for online display and negotiation of cargo rates |
CA2377939A1 (en) | 1999-06-23 | 2000-12-28 | Ariba, Inc. | Method and apparatus for trading market design and deployment |
US7330826B1 (en) * | 1999-07-09 | 2008-02-12 | Perfect.Com, Inc. | Method, system and business model for a buyer's auction with near perfect information using the internet |
US7249055B1 (en) * | 1999-07-09 | 2007-07-24 | Citicorp Credit Services, Inc. | Method and system for managing and conducting a network auction |
US6606608B1 (en) * | 1999-07-19 | 2003-08-12 | Amazon.Com, Inc. | Method and system for providing a discount at an auction |
US6405175B1 (en) * | 1999-07-27 | 2002-06-11 | David Way Ng | Shopping scouts web site for rewarding customer referrals on product and price information with rewards scaled by the number of shoppers using the information |
US6332124B1 (en) * | 1999-07-30 | 2001-12-18 | Synapse Group, Inc. | Method and system for managing magazine portfolios |
US6560620B1 (en) * | 1999-08-03 | 2003-05-06 | Aplix Research, Inc. | Hierarchical document comparison system and method |
US6499052B1 (en) | 1999-08-11 | 2002-12-24 | Yahoo! Inc. | Electronic commerce system for referencing remote commerce sites at a local commerce site |
US8015049B1 (en) * | 1999-08-18 | 2011-09-06 | S.F. Ip Properties 61 Llc | On-line appointment system |
US6356909B1 (en) * | 1999-08-23 | 2002-03-12 | Proposal Technologies Network, Inc. | Web based system for managing request for proposal and responses |
WO2001015050A1 (en) * | 1999-08-24 | 2001-03-01 | Elance, Inc. | Method and apparatus for an electronic marketplace for services having a collaborative workspace |
US20010032170A1 (en) * | 1999-08-24 | 2001-10-18 | Sheth Beerud D. | Method and system for an on-line private marketplace |
US7289964B1 (en) * | 1999-08-31 | 2007-10-30 | Accenture Llp | System and method for transaction services patterns in a netcentric environment |
US6415270B1 (en) * | 1999-09-03 | 2002-07-02 | Omnihub, Inc. | Multiple auction coordination method and system |
US6901376B1 (en) * | 1999-09-10 | 2005-05-31 | M&R Marking Systems, Inc. | Method and system for facilitating reseller transactions |
US7039860B1 (en) * | 1999-10-01 | 2006-05-02 | Netspinner Solutions As | Creating web pages category list prior to the list being served to a browser |
US6374229B1 (en) * | 1999-10-20 | 2002-04-16 | Billingnetwork.Com, Inc. | Integrated internet facilitated billing, data processing and communication system |
EP1238532A4 (en) | 1999-11-16 | 2003-04-16 | Fairmarket Inc | Network-based sales system |
US8601373B1 (en) * | 1999-11-16 | 2013-12-03 | Ebay Inc. | Network-based sales system with customizable user interface |
US6714915B1 (en) * | 1999-11-22 | 2004-03-30 | International Business Machines Corporation | System and method for project designing and developing a procurement and accounts payable system |
US7130807B1 (en) * | 1999-11-22 | 2006-10-31 | Accenture Llp | Technology sharing during demand and supply planning in a network-based supply chain environment |
US6671818B1 (en) * | 1999-11-22 | 2003-12-30 | Accenture Llp | Problem isolation through translating and filtering events into a standard object format in a network based supply chain |
US7822823B2 (en) * | 1999-12-14 | 2010-10-26 | Neeraj Jhanji | Systems for communicating current and future activity information among mobile internet users and methods therefor |
US7039608B2 (en) * | 1999-12-30 | 2006-05-02 | Ge Capital Commercial Finance, Inc. | Rapid valuation of portfolios of assets such as financial instruments |
US7403920B2 (en) * | 2000-01-14 | 2008-07-22 | Fujitsu Limited | Information mediating apparatus and method and storage medium storing information mediating program therein |
US7072858B1 (en) * | 2000-02-04 | 2006-07-04 | Xpensewise.Com, Inc. | System and method for dynamic price setting and facilitation of commercial transactions |
US6938011B1 (en) * | 2000-03-02 | 2005-08-30 | Trading Technologies International, Inc. | Click based trading with market depth display |
US7330839B2 (en) * | 2000-03-13 | 2008-02-12 | Intellions, Inc. | Method and system for dynamic pricing |
US6611881B1 (en) * | 2000-03-15 | 2003-08-26 | Personal Data Network Corporation | Method and system of providing credit card user with barcode purchase data and recommendation automatically on their personal computer |
US20010047308A1 (en) * | 2000-03-31 | 2001-11-29 | Joseph Kaminsky | Concurrent dynamic pricing marketing and selling system |
US6684250B2 (en) * | 2000-04-03 | 2004-01-27 | Quova, Inc. | Method and apparatus for estimating a geographic location of a networked entity |
US8876608B2 (en) * | 2000-04-07 | 2014-11-04 | Igt | Virtually tracking un-carded or anonymous patron session data |
US7289967B1 (en) | 2000-04-13 | 2007-10-30 | Siebel Systems, Inc. | Methods of updating information maintained at an intermediary web site |
US6430541B1 (en) * | 2000-04-28 | 2002-08-06 | International Business Machines Corporation | Managing inventory purchases |
US7313539B1 (en) * | 2000-05-08 | 2007-12-25 | Pappas Christian S | Method and system for reserving future purchases of goods or services |
US7188080B1 (en) * | 2000-05-12 | 2007-03-06 | Walker Digital, Llc | Systems and methods wherin a buyer purchases products in a plurality of product categories |
US7120629B1 (en) * | 2000-05-24 | 2006-10-10 | Reachforce, Inc. | Prospects harvester system for providing contact data about customers of product or service offered by business enterprise extracting text documents selected from newsgroups, discussion forums, mailing lists, querying such data to provide customers who confirm to business profile data |
US7363246B1 (en) * | 2000-06-19 | 2008-04-22 | Vulcan Portals, Inc. | System and method for enhancing buyer and seller interaction during a group-buying sale |
US7596509B1 (en) * | 2000-06-30 | 2009-09-29 | Jeffrey Bryson | Computer system and method for negotiating the purchase and sale of goods or services using virtual sales |
US7039594B1 (en) * | 2000-07-26 | 2006-05-02 | Accenture, Llp | Method and system for content management assessment, planning and delivery |
US7587350B1 (en) * | 2000-07-26 | 2009-09-08 | Investedge, Inc. | Integrated investment management system with network datafeed |
US7110967B1 (en) * | 2000-08-04 | 2006-09-19 | Infopia, Inc. | Method for refining an online marketplace selection for enhancing e-commerce |
US7490060B2 (en) * | 2000-09-05 | 2009-02-10 | It&E Limited | System and method for modeling market structures and processing market structure transactions over an electronic network |
US7249044B2 (en) * | 2000-10-05 | 2007-07-24 | I2 Technologies Us, Inc. | Fulfillment management system for managing ATP data in a distributed supply chain environment |
US20070112645A1 (en) * | 2000-10-11 | 2007-05-17 | Ebay Inc. | Sales system with sales activity feedback |
US7860776B1 (en) * | 2000-10-11 | 2010-12-28 | Ebay Inc. | Sales system with buyer price selection |
US7660740B2 (en) * | 2000-10-16 | 2010-02-09 | Ebay Inc. | Method and system for listing items globally and regionally, and customized listing according to currency or shipping area |
US8161081B2 (en) * | 2001-03-16 | 2012-04-17 | Michael Philip Kaufman | System and method for generating automatic user interface for arbitrarily complex or large databases |
US7185044B2 (en) * | 2000-11-06 | 2007-02-27 | The Weather Channel | Weather information delivery systems and methods providing planning functionality and navigational tools |
US7092929B1 (en) * | 2000-11-08 | 2006-08-15 | Bluefire Systems, Inc. | Method and apparatus for planning analysis |
EP1342199A1 (en) * | 2000-11-15 | 2003-09-10 | Manugistics Atlanta, Inc. | Promotion pricing system and method |
US7318049B2 (en) * | 2000-11-17 | 2008-01-08 | Gregory Fx Iannacci | System and method for an automated benefit recognition, acquisition, value exchange, and transaction settlement system using multivariable linear and nonlinear modeling |
US7184984B2 (en) * | 2000-11-17 | 2007-02-27 | Valaquenta Intellectual Properties Limited | Global electronic trading system |
US7039875B2 (en) * | 2000-11-30 | 2006-05-02 | Lucent Technologies Inc. | Computer user interfaces that are generated as needed |
US7346559B2 (en) * | 2001-02-14 | 2008-03-18 | International Business Machines Corporation | System and method for automating association of retail items to support shopping proposals |
US7308423B1 (en) * | 2001-03-19 | 2007-12-11 | Franklin Goodhue Woodward | Technique for handling sales of regulated items implemented over a data network |
US7188091B2 (en) * | 2001-03-21 | 2007-03-06 | Resolutionebs, Inc. | Rule processing system |
US6671358B1 (en) * | 2001-04-25 | 2003-12-30 | Universal Identity Technologies, Inc. | Method and system for rewarding use of a universal identifier, and/or conducting a financial transaction |
US6868413B1 (en) * | 2001-05-10 | 2005-03-15 | Networks Associates Technology, Inc. | System and method for customizing and processing business logic rules in a business process system |
US8015097B2 (en) * | 2001-05-31 | 2011-09-06 | Bgc Partners, Inc. | Securities trading system with multiple levels of interest |
US7165248B2 (en) * | 2001-06-04 | 2007-01-16 | Sun Microsystems, Inc. | File tree conflict processor |
US6671670B2 (en) * | 2001-06-27 | 2003-12-30 | Telelogue, Inc. | System and method for pre-processing information used by an automated attendant |
WO2003009105A2 (en) | 2001-07-20 | 2003-01-30 | Fairmarket, Inc. | Automated listing management |
US6910028B2 (en) * | 2001-07-27 | 2005-06-21 | International Business Machines Corporation | Conflict-handling assimilator service for exchange of rules with merging |
US7062756B2 (en) * | 2001-11-30 | 2006-06-13 | Sun Microsystems, Inc. | Dynamic object usage pattern learning and efficient caching |
US6993427B2 (en) * | 2002-09-03 | 2006-01-31 | Toyota Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha | Combustion state estimating apparatus for internal combustion engine |
US8452670B2 (en) * | 2011-02-08 | 2013-05-28 | Strategic Pharmaceutical Solutions, Inc. | Computer-enabled method and system for facilitating veterinary pharmaceutical and other animal-related product catalog customization |
-
2002
- 2002-07-22 WO PCT/US2002/023289 patent/WO2003009105A2/en not_active Application Discontinuation
- 2002-07-22 CN CNA028185625A patent/CN1628307A/en active Pending
- 2002-07-22 CA CA2455639A patent/CA2455639C/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 2002-07-22 EP EP02752516A patent/EP1417619A4/en not_active Withdrawn
- 2002-07-22 AU AU2002355130A patent/AU2002355130B2/en not_active Ceased
- 2002-07-22 US US10/201,586 patent/US7883002B2/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
-
2011
- 2011-01-31 US US13/017,471 patent/US8386328B2/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
-
2013
- 2013-02-22 US US13/774,394 patent/US9704123B2/en active Active
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
US20050033648A1 (en) | 2005-02-10 |
US20130166403A1 (en) | 2013-06-27 |
WO2003009105A3 (en) | 2003-12-11 |
US7883002B2 (en) | 2011-02-08 |
CA2455639A1 (en) | 2003-01-30 |
WO2003009105A2 (en) | 2003-01-30 |
CN1628307A (en) | 2005-06-15 |
EP1417619A2 (en) | 2004-05-12 |
US20110191201A1 (en) | 2011-08-04 |
EP1417619A4 (en) | 2005-12-21 |
AU2002355130B2 (en) | 2008-06-19 |
US9704123B2 (en) | 2017-07-11 |
US8386328B2 (en) | 2013-02-26 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
CA2455639C (en) | Automated listing management | |
AU2002355130A1 (en) | Automated listing management | |
US6567824B2 (en) | Integrated inventory management system | |
US7801778B2 (en) | Computer-implemented enterprise wide advertising inventory management system | |
US8352324B2 (en) | Method and system for managing invitations to bid | |
US7092929B1 (en) | Method and apparatus for planning analysis | |
US6434533B1 (en) | Method for the exchange, analysis, and reporting of performance data in businesses with time-dependent inventory | |
US8285600B2 (en) | Multiple criteria buying and selling model | |
US20130246223A1 (en) | Multiple criteria buying and selling model | |
US20090307145A1 (en) | Multiple price curves and attributes | |
EP0770967A2 (en) | Decision support system for the management of an agile supply chain | |
US20020035537A1 (en) | Method for economic bidding between retailers and suppliers of goods in branded, replenished categories | |
US20020052821A1 (en) | Method and system for supporting trade of securities | |
US8306886B2 (en) | System and method for predicting future prices of a cut meat | |
US20040172261A1 (en) | Method and system to dynamically determine market rent | |
Walters et al. | Computers in retailing | |
Phatak | Integration of supplier and manufacturer using ERP and forecasting techniques in a supply chain | |
DE10196726T5 (en) | Joint execution in a distributed supply chain environment | |
CA2471286A1 (en) | Production planning and vendor managed inventory system |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
EEER | Examination request | ||
MKEX | Expiry |
Effective date: 20220722 |