CA2569338A1 - Financial institution-based transaction processing system and approach - Google Patents
Financial institution-based transaction processing system and approach Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CA2569338A1 CA2569338A1 CA002569338A CA2569338A CA2569338A1 CA 2569338 A1 CA2569338 A1 CA 2569338A1 CA 002569338 A CA002569338 A CA 002569338A CA 2569338 A CA2569338 A CA 2569338A CA 2569338 A1 CA2569338 A1 CA 2569338A1
- Authority
- CA
- Canada
- Prior art keywords
- transaction
- seller
- buyer
- sponsoring
- processing system
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Abandoned
Links
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q40/00—Finance; Insurance; Tax strategies; Processing of corporate or income taxes
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q20/00—Payment architectures, schemes or protocols
- G06Q20/02—Payment architectures, schemes or protocols involving a neutral party, e.g. certification authority, notary or trusted third party [TTP]
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q20/00—Payment architectures, schemes or protocols
- G06Q20/08—Payment architectures
- G06Q20/10—Payment architectures specially adapted for electronic funds transfer [EFT] systems; specially adapted for home banking systems
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q20/00—Payment architectures, schemes or protocols
- G06Q20/08—Payment architectures
- G06Q20/12—Payment architectures specially adapted for electronic shopping systems
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q30/00—Commerce
- G06Q30/06—Buying, selling or leasing transactions
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q40/00—Finance; Insurance; Tax strategies; Processing of corporate or income taxes
- G06Q40/02—Banking, e.g. interest calculation or account maintenance
Landscapes
- Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
- Accounting & Taxation (AREA)
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Finance (AREA)
- Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
- General Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Strategic Management (AREA)
- Development Economics (AREA)
- Economics (AREA)
- Marketing (AREA)
- Technology Law (AREA)
- Computer Security & Cryptography (AREA)
- Financial Or Insurance-Related Operations Such As Payment And Settlement (AREA)
- Management, Administration, Business Operations System, And Electronic Commerce (AREA)
Abstract
Transaction processing (210) for financial institution-based transactions (230, 240) is facilitated. According to an example embodiment of the present invention, a transaction processing approach involves the processing of financial aspects of a transaction between buying and selling parties using transaction rules (214) associated with a sponsoring financial institution (230, 240). Transaction-related information is processed as a function of business rules associated with the sponsoring financial institution to facilitate payment for the transaction and the assessment of fees associated with the transaction processing.
Description
FINANCIAL INSTITUTION-BASED TRANSACTION
PROCESSING SYSTEM AND APPROACH
Field of the Invention The present invention is directed to communications and data processing and, more specifically, to communications and data processing involving transaction-related financial processing.
Background Operational management of contractual and transactional interactions between buyers, sellers, financial institutions and others involved in the exchange of products for purposes of commerce have typically been labor and time intensive. Generally, the processes of managing transactions between business entities have been unduly burdensome and inefficient.
Financial institutions employ transaction processing parameters that are unique to each institution. In addition, these transaction processing parameters typically need to be kept separate (and confidential), relative to other financial institutions.
Often, transaction processing is dependent upon these parameters, which are specific to a particular financial institution involved in financing the transaction. In this regard, transaction processing for portions of a transaction that are related to a financial institution has generally been limited to implementation by a processing engine or system employed by the financial institution participating in the transaction.
When a transaction reaches the payment step, financial institutions for different parties to the transaction must interact with each other. This interaction typically involves complex agreements and associations that facilitate the transfer of funds. At times, there can be delays in payment or disputes regarding terms of payment. In addition, this process is higl-Ay susceptible to error. Interaction complexity, delay and error, as well as a multitude of other characteristics of transaction payment can cost one or more parties to a transaction (including fmancial institutions) a significant amount of funds.
Most industries are quite competitive and any cost savings are therefore important.
Administrative costs are targeted for reduction as no revenue is directly generated from administrative functions. However, administrative costs associated with commercial
PROCESSING SYSTEM AND APPROACH
Field of the Invention The present invention is directed to communications and data processing and, more specifically, to communications and data processing involving transaction-related financial processing.
Background Operational management of contractual and transactional interactions between buyers, sellers, financial institutions and others involved in the exchange of products for purposes of commerce have typically been labor and time intensive. Generally, the processes of managing transactions between business entities have been unduly burdensome and inefficient.
Financial institutions employ transaction processing parameters that are unique to each institution. In addition, these transaction processing parameters typically need to be kept separate (and confidential), relative to other financial institutions.
Often, transaction processing is dependent upon these parameters, which are specific to a particular financial institution involved in financing the transaction. In this regard, transaction processing for portions of a transaction that are related to a financial institution has generally been limited to implementation by a processing engine or system employed by the financial institution participating in the transaction.
When a transaction reaches the payment step, financial institutions for different parties to the transaction must interact with each other. This interaction typically involves complex agreements and associations that facilitate the transfer of funds. At times, there can be delays in payment or disputes regarding terms of payment. In addition, this process is higl-Ay susceptible to error. Interaction complexity, delay and error, as well as a multitude of other characteristics of transaction payment can cost one or more parties to a transaction (including fmancial institutions) a significant amount of funds.
Most industries are quite competitive and any cost savings are therefore important.
Administrative costs are targeted for reduction as no revenue is directly generated from administrative functions. However, administrative costs associated with commercial
2 transactions have been difficult to reduce in the current business environment with widely diffused data.
The above and other difficulties in the management and coordination of financial transactions have presented administrative and cost challenges to entities involved in various aspects of transactions, including financial institutions and others.
Summary The present invention is directed to overcoming the above-mentioned challenges and others related to the types of devices and applications discussed above and in other applications. The present invention is exemplified in a number of implementations and applications, some of which are summarized below.
According to an example embodiment of the present invention, financial transactions involving financial institutions are managed using an approach generally involving the use of rules for processing payment-related aspects of the financial transactions.
In a more particular example embodiment of the present invention, a transaction management system is configured for using sets of rules associated witli financial institutions for processing transactions. When transaction information is received, it is associated with a particular sponsoring financial institution. Rules for the sponsoring institution are used to process the transaction. In some instances, the rules are further selected and implemented as a function of one or more of the sponsored transaction parties (e. g. , a buyer or seller).
In another example embodiment of the present invention, an automated transaction processing system is adapted for processing transactions involving a plurality of financial institutions. The system includes a central processing node adapted to audit (e.g., validate or otherwise approve) transactions between contracting parties according to different sets of transaction rules. Each of the respective sets of transaction rules are defined as a function of a unique one of the plurality of financial institutions and a relationship between the unique financial institution and at least one of the contracting parties.
According to another example embodiment of the present invention, an automated transaction processing system audits transactions between contracting parties on behalf of a plurality of fmancial institutions. The automated transaction processing system includes a
The above and other difficulties in the management and coordination of financial transactions have presented administrative and cost challenges to entities involved in various aspects of transactions, including financial institutions and others.
Summary The present invention is directed to overcoming the above-mentioned challenges and others related to the types of devices and applications discussed above and in other applications. The present invention is exemplified in a number of implementations and applications, some of which are summarized below.
According to an example embodiment of the present invention, financial transactions involving financial institutions are managed using an approach generally involving the use of rules for processing payment-related aspects of the financial transactions.
In a more particular example embodiment of the present invention, a transaction management system is configured for using sets of rules associated witli financial institutions for processing transactions. When transaction information is received, it is associated with a particular sponsoring financial institution. Rules for the sponsoring institution are used to process the transaction. In some instances, the rules are further selected and implemented as a function of one or more of the sponsored transaction parties (e. g. , a buyer or seller).
In another example embodiment of the present invention, an automated transaction processing system is adapted for processing transactions involving a plurality of financial institutions. The system includes a central processing node adapted to audit (e.g., validate or otherwise approve) transactions between contracting parties according to different sets of transaction rules. Each of the respective sets of transaction rules are defined as a function of a unique one of the plurality of financial institutions and a relationship between the unique financial institution and at least one of the contracting parties.
According to another example embodiment of the present invention, an automated transaction processing system audits transactions between contracting parties on behalf of a plurality of fmancial institutions. The automated transaction processing system includes a
3 central processing node adapted, for different transactions involving various fmancial institutions, to associate each transaction with a unique one of the plurality of financial institutions and to audit each associated transaction according to a set of transaction rules.
These transaction rules are defined as a function of the unique financial institution and a business relationship between the unique financial institution and at least one of the contracting parties. In this regard, the audit involves using information in the rules, upon which payment can be authorized, and comparing or otherwise processing information for a particular transaction (e.g., receipt of goods, issuance of an invoice) to approve payment for the transaction (or deny payment where transaction information fails to satisfy payment-type conditions). The central processing node facilitates payment for each transaction as a function of the audit.
The above summary of the present invention is not intended to describe each illustrated embodiment or every implementation of the present invention. The figures and detailed description that follow more particularly exemplify these embodiments.
, Brief Description of the Drawings The invention may be more completely understood in consideration of the detailed description of various embodiments of the invention in connection with the accompanying drawings, in which:
FIG. 1 shows a transaction processing arrangement, according to an example embodiment of the present invention;
FIG. 2 shows an arrangement and approach for transaction management, according to another example embodiment of the present invention; and FIG. 3 shows a flow diagram for transaction processing, according to another example embodiment of the present invention.
While the invention is amenable to various modifications and alternative forms, specifics thereof have been shown by way of example in the drawings and will be described in detail. It should be understood, however, that the intention is not necessarily to limit the invention to the particular embodiments described. On the contrary, the intention is to cover all modifications, equivalents, and alternatives falling within the spirit and scope of the invention as defined by the appended claims.
These transaction rules are defined as a function of the unique financial institution and a business relationship between the unique financial institution and at least one of the contracting parties. In this regard, the audit involves using information in the rules, upon which payment can be authorized, and comparing or otherwise processing information for a particular transaction (e.g., receipt of goods, issuance of an invoice) to approve payment for the transaction (or deny payment where transaction information fails to satisfy payment-type conditions). The central processing node facilitates payment for each transaction as a function of the audit.
The above summary of the present invention is not intended to describe each illustrated embodiment or every implementation of the present invention. The figures and detailed description that follow more particularly exemplify these embodiments.
, Brief Description of the Drawings The invention may be more completely understood in consideration of the detailed description of various embodiments of the invention in connection with the accompanying drawings, in which:
FIG. 1 shows a transaction processing arrangement, according to an example embodiment of the present invention;
FIG. 2 shows an arrangement and approach for transaction management, according to another example embodiment of the present invention; and FIG. 3 shows a flow diagram for transaction processing, according to another example embodiment of the present invention.
While the invention is amenable to various modifications and alternative forms, specifics thereof have been shown by way of example in the drawings and will be described in detail. It should be understood, however, that the intention is not necessarily to limit the invention to the particular embodiments described. On the contrary, the intention is to cover all modifications, equivalents, and alternatives falling within the spirit and scope of the invention as defined by the appended claims.
4 Detailed Description The present invention is believed to be applicable to a variety of different types of communications and financial process management approaches, and has been found to be particularly useful for applications involving the operational implementation and application of financial institution rules and processes with transactions, payments, tracking and related aspects thereof. While the present invention is not necessarily limited to such approaches, various aspects of the invention may be appreciated through a discussion of various examples using these and other contexts.
According to an example embodiment of the present invention, a financial rules-based transaction approach is implemented with multiple sponsoring financial institutions for automatically processing financial transactions. The sponsoring financial institutions sponsor transaction parties (e.g., buyers and sellers); finaicial aspects of transactions between two or more of the sponsored transaction parties are carried out as a function of business rules for the financial institution sponsoring each party.
In anotlier example embodiment of the present invention, a central transaction management system uses business rules (e.g., included in profile infonnation) associated witli financial institutions to process financial transactions between parties sponsored by the financial institutions. When the central transaction management system receives transaction information, the information is parsed for identifying characteristics that can be associated with sponsoring financial institutions. When these identifying characteristics match a particular financial institution, the central transaction management system uses business rules for the financial institution to process the financial transaction. In addition, when identifying characteristics for different parties to the transaction match different financial institutions, fmancial aspects of the transaction that are specific to each party are processed .25 according to the each party's corresponding sponsoring financial institution. Funds relating to the financial transaction are thus transferred according to the business rules associated with sponsoring financial institutions for each party and to the particular characteristics of the financial transaction.
In one implementation, the central transaction management system audits data for transactions between the different parties as a function of business rules for one or more of the transaction parties. For example, where a particular party specifies conditions, in its business rules, upon which payment can be authorized, the central transaction management
According to an example embodiment of the present invention, a financial rules-based transaction approach is implemented with multiple sponsoring financial institutions for automatically processing financial transactions. The sponsoring financial institutions sponsor transaction parties (e.g., buyers and sellers); finaicial aspects of transactions between two or more of the sponsored transaction parties are carried out as a function of business rules for the financial institution sponsoring each party.
In anotlier example embodiment of the present invention, a central transaction management system uses business rules (e.g., included in profile infonnation) associated witli financial institutions to process financial transactions between parties sponsored by the financial institutions. When the central transaction management system receives transaction information, the information is parsed for identifying characteristics that can be associated with sponsoring financial institutions. When these identifying characteristics match a particular financial institution, the central transaction management system uses business rules for the financial institution to process the financial transaction. In addition, when identifying characteristics for different parties to the transaction match different financial institutions, fmancial aspects of the transaction that are specific to each party are processed .25 according to the each party's corresponding sponsoring financial institution. Funds relating to the financial transaction are thus transferred according to the business rules associated with sponsoring financial institutions for each party and to the particular characteristics of the financial transaction.
In one implementation, the central transaction management system audits data for transactions between the different parties as a function of business rules for one or more of the transaction parties. For example, where a particular party specifies conditions, in its business rules, upon which payment can be authorized, the central transaction management
5 PCT/US2005/020622 system implements those conditions in connection with the audit and determines therefrom a condition of payment for the transaction (e.g., whether some or all of a particular invoice can be paid). As another example, different parties to a contract may specify rules upon which transaction data is to be audited to indicate that the transaction is valid and/or ripe for 5 payment. This auditing may include, for example, setting a price for a particular transaction, such as setting the price for a shipment involving bill of lading (BOL) rating or setting the price for a transaction based on characteristics of the transaction such as quantity of goods and/or receipt of the goods. In another example, the auditing involves comparing terms in transaction data from an electronic invoice to previously agreed upon contract terms; where the invoice matches the terms, or is within a tolerance where specified, the auditing results in an approval (i. e., validation of the transaction) for payment of the invoice. A multitude of such auditing approaches can selectively be implemented, based on various terms set by different -transaction parties, by sponsoring financial institutions or other related entities.
In another implementation, the central transaction management system further uses business rules associated witli individual parties to a transaction in processing financial transactions involving the individual parties. For instance, when the central transaction management system receives transaction information, the information is parsed (as discussed above) to identify sponsoring financial institutions as well as the parties to the transaction.. The transaction is then process according to the business rules of the sponsoring financial institutions as well as the business rules of the parties to the transaction. These party-specific business rules may be stored, for example, in a user profile that is accessible by the central transaction management system. The user profiles may include identifiers used to identify buyer or seller transaction parties and/or sponsoring financial institutions.
In some instances, the sponsoring financial institution for a particular party is identified as a function of the identity of the party and corresponding business rules for the party. For example, when a party sets business rules to identify a particular sponsoring financial institution, these business rules are implemented in selecting the sponsoring financial institution. Correspondingly, the business rules for the financial institution identified by the party's business rules are used to process the financial transaction.
In another implementation, the central transaction management system further uses business rules associated witli individual parties to a transaction in processing financial transactions involving the individual parties. For instance, when the central transaction management system receives transaction information, the information is parsed (as discussed above) to identify sponsoring financial institutions as well as the parties to the transaction.. The transaction is then process according to the business rules of the sponsoring financial institutions as well as the business rules of the parties to the transaction. These party-specific business rules may be stored, for example, in a user profile that is accessible by the central transaction management system. The user profiles may include identifiers used to identify buyer or seller transaction parties and/or sponsoring financial institutions.
In some instances, the sponsoring financial institution for a particular party is identified as a function of the identity of the party and corresponding business rules for the party. For example, when a party sets business rules to identify a particular sponsoring financial institution, these business rules are implemented in selecting the sponsoring financial institution. Correspondingly, the business rules for the financial institution identified by the party's business rules are used to process the financial transaction.
6 In other instances, two or more financial institutions can be specified by a particular party, including sponsoring and/or non-sponsoring financial institutions.
Business rules for the particular party may include financial institution selection criteria that is implemented as a function of the particular transaction. For instance, selection criteria may be configured to indicate that payment for transactions under a certain value be processed (financed) using a first financial institution, while payment for transactions at or over the certain value be processed using a second financial institution. This approach may be implemented, for example, where large value transactions that may involve a longer payment period are desirably financed through a financial institution offering terms that are practicable for maintaining a longer payment term (i.e., lower rates). Small value transactions typically involving a shorter (or no) payment term may preferably be serviced using a financial institution offering desirable services or low service fees, but higher rates.
Sponsoring financial institutions may implement criteria similar to that discussed in the paragraph above for selecting a particular institution via which to process transactions, with selected criteria being implemented for making such selections. This approach may be useful, for example, where parties to the transaction agree to use a financial institution selected by the sponsoring financial institution that sponsors the party into the automated transaction process. In this regard, the financial institution selected for providing payment for a particular transaction is selectively different than the sponsoring financial institution.
Such a financial institution may be selected by the sponsoring financial institution using, for exainple, a geographical location of a seller to which payment is to be made.
In some implementations, the central transaction management system works to keep separate the transaction rules for each financial institution (and transaction parties, where appropriate). Access to the transaction rules is restricted to the institution (or party) to which the rules belong. This restricted access approach may be implemented using, for example, encryption, passwords, tracking and other security-type measures typically implemented for data access and protection.
In some applications, a data access controller facilitates the restriction of access to transaction information by providing access to each fmancial institution for data relating to their clients. The data access controller selectively facilitates access via an overview type of data presentation that shows a financial overview for each customer to whom the financial institution issues credit. For example, for buyer customers, the data access controller
Business rules for the particular party may include financial institution selection criteria that is implemented as a function of the particular transaction. For instance, selection criteria may be configured to indicate that payment for transactions under a certain value be processed (financed) using a first financial institution, while payment for transactions at or over the certain value be processed using a second financial institution. This approach may be implemented, for example, where large value transactions that may involve a longer payment period are desirably financed through a financial institution offering terms that are practicable for maintaining a longer payment term (i.e., lower rates). Small value transactions typically involving a shorter (or no) payment term may preferably be serviced using a financial institution offering desirable services or low service fees, but higher rates.
Sponsoring financial institutions may implement criteria similar to that discussed in the paragraph above for selecting a particular institution via which to process transactions, with selected criteria being implemented for making such selections. This approach may be useful, for example, where parties to the transaction agree to use a financial institution selected by the sponsoring financial institution that sponsors the party into the automated transaction process. In this regard, the financial institution selected for providing payment for a particular transaction is selectively different than the sponsoring financial institution.
Such a financial institution may be selected by the sponsoring financial institution using, for exainple, a geographical location of a seller to which payment is to be made.
In some implementations, the central transaction management system works to keep separate the transaction rules for each financial institution (and transaction parties, where appropriate). Access to the transaction rules is restricted to the institution (or party) to which the rules belong. This restricted access approach may be implemented using, for example, encryption, passwords, tracking and other security-type measures typically implemented for data access and protection.
In some applications, a data access controller facilitates the restriction of access to transaction information by providing access to each fmancial institution for data relating to their clients. The data access controller selectively facilitates access via an overview type of data presentation that shows a financial overview for each customer to whom the financial institution issues credit. For example, for buyer customers, the data access controller
7 selectively implements an overview showing each buyer's net position between payments due from the buyer and payments due to sellers (suppliers) through the transaction processing system.
In another application, the data access controller discussed above is further configured and arranged, for each sponsoring financial institution, to perform customer service functions related to transaction processing for the financial institution's customers within the transaction processing system. Such customer service functions are defined in the sponsoring financial institution's business rules in association with each customer. The data access controller implements the business rules in performing the customer service functions.
Business rules used by the central transaction management system may be stored using one or more of a variety of approaches. For example, a database accessible by the central transaction management system and having labels or other identifying characteristics that associate the business rules with a particular financial institution can be used. This database can be physically local or remote to the central transaction management system, as long as the central transaction management system can access the database and control access to the database by other entities.
The central transaction management system is further configured to interface with financial institutions for a particular transaction party, in addition to a sponsoring financial institution for the transaction party. For instance, where a transaction party has primary banking functions with a non-sponsoring financial institution, the sponsoring financial institution, via the central transaction management system, facilitates the transaction by exchanging funds via the non-sponsoring financial institution. The sponsoring financial institution may further implement processing type fees via the central transaction management system, charged for facilitating the financial transaction.
In some instances, the central transaction management system interfaces directly with financial institutions that, from a hierarchical perspective, pass-through information received from one or more parties to the transaction. The central transaction management system uses transaction rules based on the transaction information received from a financial institution. Effectively, the financial institutions use the central transaction management system to execute transaction-processing functions that are carried out using transaction-
In another application, the data access controller discussed above is further configured and arranged, for each sponsoring financial institution, to perform customer service functions related to transaction processing for the financial institution's customers within the transaction processing system. Such customer service functions are defined in the sponsoring financial institution's business rules in association with each customer. The data access controller implements the business rules in performing the customer service functions.
Business rules used by the central transaction management system may be stored using one or more of a variety of approaches. For example, a database accessible by the central transaction management system and having labels or other identifying characteristics that associate the business rules with a particular financial institution can be used. This database can be physically local or remote to the central transaction management system, as long as the central transaction management system can access the database and control access to the database by other entities.
The central transaction management system is further configured to interface with financial institutions for a particular transaction party, in addition to a sponsoring financial institution for the transaction party. For instance, where a transaction party has primary banking functions with a non-sponsoring financial institution, the sponsoring financial institution, via the central transaction management system, facilitates the transaction by exchanging funds via the non-sponsoring financial institution. The sponsoring financial institution may further implement processing type fees via the central transaction management system, charged for facilitating the financial transaction.
In some instances, the central transaction management system interfaces directly with financial institutions that, from a hierarchical perspective, pass-through information received from one or more parties to the transaction. The central transaction management system uses transaction rules based on the transaction information received from a financial institution. Effectively, the financial institutions use the central transaction management system to execute transaction-processing functions that are carried out using transaction-
8 based rules specific to the particular fmancial institution providing the transaction information.
In other instances, the central transaction management system is adapted to interface directly with parties to a transaction and to use transaction rules based on information received from one or more of the parties (i.e., without a sponsoring financial institution).
For example, a buyer or seller can interface with the central transaction management system using rules, implemented with the system, which are based on profile information for the particular buyer or seller. These parties may contract with a system administration entity, effectively acting as a sponsoring financial institution in some regards, relative to the above discussion, to facilitate transactions in this manner.
According to another example embodiment of the present invention, a central transaction management system uses transaction information for buyers and sellers of products and/or services to automatically derive pricing and/or payment options for individual transactions. These products and services may include, for example, tangible goods, sliipment services, consulting services and financial services (e.g., where the seller may be a financial institution selling a financing package for a transaction between a buyer and another seller). The transaction information may include, for example, the identities of the buyer and seller, the products and/or services being purchased, the date of the purchase and the specific contract under the terms of which the transaction is being executed. For instance, specific contracts under the terms of which a transaction is being prosecuted may include prices agreed upon between a buyer and seller for a particular product and/or service.
Transaction-related contracts facilitated by the central transaction management system may also (or in the alternative) include rules agreed upon for setting certain fmancial and/or price terms between a buyer and seller. In one instance, terms associated with a particular transaction are automatically set by the central transaction management system to correspond to transaction information assigned to a particular buyer. The terms may be set, for example, using predetermined terms agreed to by the buyer and seller involved in the transaction. In another iunplementation, pricing arrangements such as quantity discounts, group discounts and conditional price variances (e.g., an acceptable percentage of variance in cost associated with for fluctuating shipping costs, product prices, fmancing costs and others) are further automatically implemented in response to the transaction information and
In other instances, the central transaction management system is adapted to interface directly with parties to a transaction and to use transaction rules based on information received from one or more of the parties (i.e., without a sponsoring financial institution).
For example, a buyer or seller can interface with the central transaction management system using rules, implemented with the system, which are based on profile information for the particular buyer or seller. These parties may contract with a system administration entity, effectively acting as a sponsoring financial institution in some regards, relative to the above discussion, to facilitate transactions in this manner.
According to another example embodiment of the present invention, a central transaction management system uses transaction information for buyers and sellers of products and/or services to automatically derive pricing and/or payment options for individual transactions. These products and services may include, for example, tangible goods, sliipment services, consulting services and financial services (e.g., where the seller may be a financial institution selling a financing package for a transaction between a buyer and another seller). The transaction information may include, for example, the identities of the buyer and seller, the products and/or services being purchased, the date of the purchase and the specific contract under the terms of which the transaction is being executed. For instance, specific contracts under the terms of which a transaction is being prosecuted may include prices agreed upon between a buyer and seller for a particular product and/or service.
Transaction-related contracts facilitated by the central transaction management system may also (or in the alternative) include rules agreed upon for setting certain fmancial and/or price terms between a buyer and seller. In one instance, terms associated with a particular transaction are automatically set by the central transaction management system to correspond to transaction information assigned to a particular buyer. The terms may be set, for example, using predetermined terms agreed to by the buyer and seller involved in the transaction. In another iunplementation, pricing arrangements such as quantity discounts, group discounts and conditional price variances (e.g., an acceptable percentage of variance in cost associated with for fluctuating shipping costs, product prices, fmancing costs and others) are further automatically implemented in response to the transaction information and
9 the approved contract details in the central transaction management system. In still another implementation, financing terms such as processing fees for facilitating a transaction, interest-related fees, credit-extension fees and others are automatically set as a function of such a transaction-related contract. Where credit is extended, a rating engine is optionally implemented to assign an interest rate to an applicable transaction, for extending credit on behalf of a contracting party to the transaction.
Turning now to the figures, one or more of the above-discussed approaches are selectively iinplemented in connection with the processors and other functions shown in the figures and discussed as follows. Beginning with FIG. 1, a transaction processing arrangement 100 includes a central transaction processor 110 programmed to automatically process transaction information according to business rules corresponding to particular financial institutions, according to another example embodiment of the present invention.
When transaction information is received at the central transaction processor 110, the information is associated with sponsoring financial institutions for each party to the transaction and processed according to business rules for the sponsoring financial institutions. The central transaction processor 110 may be implemented, for example, in connection with the above-discussed approaches including those involving the discussion of a central transaction management system and/or with a central transaction node in a network node-based arrangement.
Business rules are supplied by a multitude of financial institutions employing the central transaction node 110, represented here by financial institution nodes 120 and 128.
In some instances, parties involved in transactions facilitated by the central transaction node also supply business rules. The central transaction processor 110 is in communication with a database 112 where transaction-related information including the above-discussed financial institution rules is stored. The database 112 is optionally coupled to (or part of) the central transaction processor 110 and fu.rther may include a plurality of data storage arrangements at different locations. The central transaction node 110 maintains separate (and secure) storage for these business rules by restricting access to the rules by the financial institutions (or others such as transaction parties).
The central transaction node 110 is further adapted to communicate with a variety of different parties to a transaction, represented by transaction parties 122, 124 and 126. These transaction parties and the financial institutions represented by user nodes 120, 122, 124, 126 and 128 are communicatively coupled with the central transaction processor 110. The user nodes 120-128 may, for example, include one or more of a buyer, seller, distributor, shipper, carrier, government agency, financial institution or other type of individual, group or agency that would be involved in a transaction, with parties shown in the figure by way 5 of example.
The nodes 120-128 interact with the central transaction processor 110 for providing transaction-related information, such as financial processing rules, accounting rules, orders, invoices, shipping documents, payment authorization data, payment execution data, customs documents, security documents and others. In addition, this transaction-related information
Turning now to the figures, one or more of the above-discussed approaches are selectively iinplemented in connection with the processors and other functions shown in the figures and discussed as follows. Beginning with FIG. 1, a transaction processing arrangement 100 includes a central transaction processor 110 programmed to automatically process transaction information according to business rules corresponding to particular financial institutions, according to another example embodiment of the present invention.
When transaction information is received at the central transaction processor 110, the information is associated with sponsoring financial institutions for each party to the transaction and processed according to business rules for the sponsoring financial institutions. The central transaction processor 110 may be implemented, for example, in connection with the above-discussed approaches including those involving the discussion of a central transaction management system and/or with a central transaction node in a network node-based arrangement.
Business rules are supplied by a multitude of financial institutions employing the central transaction node 110, represented here by financial institution nodes 120 and 128.
In some instances, parties involved in transactions facilitated by the central transaction node also supply business rules. The central transaction processor 110 is in communication with a database 112 where transaction-related information including the above-discussed financial institution rules is stored. The database 112 is optionally coupled to (or part of) the central transaction processor 110 and fu.rther may include a plurality of data storage arrangements at different locations. The central transaction node 110 maintains separate (and secure) storage for these business rules by restricting access to the rules by the financial institutions (or others such as transaction parties).
The central transaction node 110 is further adapted to communicate with a variety of different parties to a transaction, represented by transaction parties 122, 124 and 126. These transaction parties and the financial institutions represented by user nodes 120, 122, 124, 126 and 128 are communicatively coupled with the central transaction processor 110. The user nodes 120-128 may, for example, include one or more of a buyer, seller, distributor, shipper, carrier, government agency, financial institution or other type of individual, group or agency that would be involved in a transaction, with parties shown in the figure by way 5 of example.
The nodes 120-128 interact with the central transaction processor 110 for providing transaction-related information, such as financial processing rules, accounting rules, orders, invoices, shipping documents, payment authorization data, payment execution data, customs documents, security documents and others. In addition, this transaction-related information
10 may include information for relating the application of rules to transaction data, such as payment processes, credit extension and finance charges. In some instances, financial institution nodes provide rules that are stored in the database 112, with other party nodes simply interacting with the central transaction node 110 (e.g., without providing any information for storage in the database 112). Transactions are thus processed as a function of stored rules for a particular financial institution (or institutions) with which the transactions are associated. In other instances, the database 112 is also implemented for maintaining transaction party-type information, such as user preferences (e.g., reporting, billing, credit extension) and financial institution preferences (e.g., which institution to use).
The transaction parties 122, 124 and 126 may be implemented via sponsoring financial institutions, with nodes 122, 124 and 126 representing this combination of transaction parties with a particular sponsoring financial institution. This combinatorial representation may also maintain direct interaction between transaction parties and the central transaction node 110 for facilitating party-specific communications, such as for setting business rules or profile information for individual parties.
In some implementations, one or more of the nodes 120-128 are used as interfaces to the central transaction processor 110, with users at the nodes being able to provide transaction-related information such as classification rules. In other implementations, the central transaction processor 110 automatically accesses information from the user nodes for a variety of purposes, such as retrieving classification rules (e.g., accounting codes and/or business rules) or updating related accounting fields. This interaction between the nodes and the central transaction processor 110 is controlled using, for example, access authorization such as those involving password-protected authorization and others.
The transaction parties 122, 124 and 126 may be implemented via sponsoring financial institutions, with nodes 122, 124 and 126 representing this combination of transaction parties with a particular sponsoring financial institution. This combinatorial representation may also maintain direct interaction between transaction parties and the central transaction node 110 for facilitating party-specific communications, such as for setting business rules or profile information for individual parties.
In some implementations, one or more of the nodes 120-128 are used as interfaces to the central transaction processor 110, with users at the nodes being able to provide transaction-related information such as classification rules. In other implementations, the central transaction processor 110 automatically accesses information from the user nodes for a variety of purposes, such as retrieving classification rules (e.g., accounting codes and/or business rules) or updating related accounting fields. This interaction between the nodes and the central transaction processor 110 is controlled using, for example, access authorization such as those involving password-protected authorization and others.
11 When transaction data is received at the central transaction node 110 for financial institution-type processing, the central transaction node parses the data and automatically associates the transaction data with a particular financial institution sponsoring the transaction to which the data applies. This automatic association is implemented using business rules in the database 112 and/or as a function of the node sending the transaction data. In some instances, profile information for various sponsoring financial institutions (and/or transaction parties) is stored in the database 112 and used in connection with identifiers in received transaction information to automatically associate the transaction information with sponsoring financial institutions. The central transaction node 110 processes the associated data according to applicable business rules that may be tailored, for example, to a particular type of transaction or to particular transaction characteristics.
Where credit is extended on behalf of users, the central transaction processor selectively assigns an interest rate to the extension of credit, either directly wherein an administrator of the central transaction processor extends credit, or in connection with an interest rate offered by a financial institution extending the credit. In some applications, the central transaction processor 110 implements a rating engine to assign an interest rate to an applicable transaction, for extending credit on behalf of a contracting party to the transaction. The rating engine uses information about the contracting party in order to establish such an interest rate.
In another example embodiment, the central transaction processor 110 is further adapted to grant and control information exchange with the database 112 as a function of inputs received from the nodes 120-128, such as authorization inputs and transaction-specific inputs. When users at one of the nodes 120-128 attempt to send information to or retrieve information from the central transaction processor 110, authorization information from the users is used to control the information transfer. The authorization information may include, for example, access-type information (e.g., a password or user ID) or simply document information that the central transaction processor 110 recognizes.
In another example embodiment, the central transaction processor 110 maintains data for business rules and processed transactions over time for a variety of purposes, such as for generating reports, tracking compliance and for taking appropriate action where errors or non-coinpliance occurs. For example, when a particular transaction is processed or when
Where credit is extended on behalf of users, the central transaction processor selectively assigns an interest rate to the extension of credit, either directly wherein an administrator of the central transaction processor extends credit, or in connection with an interest rate offered by a financial institution extending the credit. In some applications, the central transaction processor 110 implements a rating engine to assign an interest rate to an applicable transaction, for extending credit on behalf of a contracting party to the transaction. The rating engine uses information about the contracting party in order to establish such an interest rate.
In another example embodiment, the central transaction processor 110 is further adapted to grant and control information exchange with the database 112 as a function of inputs received from the nodes 120-128, such as authorization inputs and transaction-specific inputs. When users at one of the nodes 120-128 attempt to send information to or retrieve information from the central transaction processor 110, authorization information from the users is used to control the information transfer. The authorization information may include, for example, access-type information (e.g., a password or user ID) or simply document information that the central transaction processor 110 recognizes.
In another example embodiment, the central transaction processor 110 maintains data for business rules and processed transactions over time for a variety of purposes, such as for generating reports, tracking compliance and for taking appropriate action where errors or non-coinpliance occurs. For example, when a particular transaction is processed or when
12 business rules are changed, the central processor monitors associated information and stores and/or processes the monitored information for these purposes.
The user profiles and/or business rules discussed herein in connection with FIG. 1 above and otherwise may include a variety of information for use in transaction management and financial processing. For instance, in addition to the above-discussed approaches, a typical such profile may include one or more of the following data: general ledger charts of accounts, identification of computer systems submitting contract or transaction data, customer lists, vendor lists, financial institution lists, contract and price approval policies, transactional approval policies, business rules, operational roles (e.g., defining what functions a user associated with that role can perform), organizational hierarclly (e.g., defining how much of a company's data a user associated with a particular organizational node can access), and individual users. Financial institution profiles may also include information further defining the business relationship with selected customers or other financial institutions and financial processing organizations from the financial institution's perspective.
FIG. 2 shows an arrangement and approach for transaction management in an automated transaction network, according to another example embodiment of the present invention. A transaction processing system 210 interfaces with a plurality of financial institutions for facilitating transactions, using data stored in a database 220 for impleinenting rules for the transactions. These rules are used to process financial aspects of the transactions, relative to information received via sponsoring financial institutions.
Two sponsoring financial institutions (230 and 240) are shown, with multiple such institutions being contemplated but not shown for brevity. Each sponsoring financial institution 230 and 240 works with multiple users, represented as usersl-N for institution 230, and users A-i for institution 240. Communications between the sponsoring financial institutions and the transaction processing system 210, as shown by communication links, may be implemented directly from the sponsoring financial institutions. In addition, the shown communication links may represent a direct communication from a sponsored user, the user including in the communication sufficient information (and security type information, where appropriate) to designate the appropriate sponsoring financial institution.
The user profiles and/or business rules discussed herein in connection with FIG. 1 above and otherwise may include a variety of information for use in transaction management and financial processing. For instance, in addition to the above-discussed approaches, a typical such profile may include one or more of the following data: general ledger charts of accounts, identification of computer systems submitting contract or transaction data, customer lists, vendor lists, financial institution lists, contract and price approval policies, transactional approval policies, business rules, operational roles (e.g., defining what functions a user associated with that role can perform), organizational hierarclly (e.g., defining how much of a company's data a user associated with a particular organizational node can access), and individual users. Financial institution profiles may also include information further defining the business relationship with selected customers or other financial institutions and financial processing organizations from the financial institution's perspective.
FIG. 2 shows an arrangement and approach for transaction management in an automated transaction network, according to another example embodiment of the present invention. A transaction processing system 210 interfaces with a plurality of financial institutions for facilitating transactions, using data stored in a database 220 for impleinenting rules for the transactions. These rules are used to process financial aspects of the transactions, relative to information received via sponsoring financial institutions.
Two sponsoring financial institutions (230 and 240) are shown, with multiple such institutions being contemplated but not shown for brevity. Each sponsoring financial institution 230 and 240 works with multiple users, represented as usersl-N for institution 230, and users A-i for institution 240. Communications between the sponsoring financial institutions and the transaction processing system 210, as shown by communication links, may be implemented directly from the sponsoring financial institutions. In addition, the shown communication links may represent a direct communication from a sponsored user, the user including in the communication sufficient information (and security type information, where appropriate) to designate the appropriate sponsoring financial institution.
13 The transaction processing system 210 also interfaces with a variety of funds processing originators. By way of example, automatic clearing house (ACH) originators 250 and 270, and SWIFT (a European-based, straight tlirough processing (STP) transaction system) originators 260 and 280 are shown. These funds processing originators are typically implemented as financial institutions having appropriate funds processing capabilities for implementing, for example, ACH or SWIFT-type functions. In this regard, the transaction processing system 210 interfaces with financial transaction processing entities for obtaining authorization to proceed with a transaction and to coordinate fund transfer using the respective originators (i.e., as conventional). The transaction processing system's interface with ACH and other providers is selectively specified by business rules used in processing a particular transaction for payment and facilitation functions.
The business rules in database 220 typically include user-specified rules that are provided by the financial institutions using the transaction processing system 210 for processing financial transactions. For example, user profile information for each sponsoring financial institution can be stored in the database 220 for use by the transaction processing system 210. This profile information may include, for example; business rules specifying one or more various conditions or approaches related to financial transaction processing, as discussed herein. For more information regarding transaction processing in general, and for specific information regarding the use of user profiles and business rules for transactions, as well as computer and processing arrangements and systems for use with the same (and as may be implemented in connection with one or more example einbodiments herein), reference may be made to U.S. Patent Application Serial No. 10/436,878 (USBA.
10 1 PA), entitled "Automated Transaction Processing System and Approach" and filed May 12, 2003, and to U.S. Patent No. 5,910,896 (USBA.002PA) filed November 12, 1996, all of which are incorporated herein by reference.
When the transaction processing system 210 receives transaction data identifying a particular sponsoring financial institution, the database 220 is accessed to retrieve profile information (and corresponding business rules) for processing the transaction data. The business rules are used to determine a variety of transaction-related characteristics, such as fees to be charged for different parties to the transaction, including buyer, seller and their respective financial institutions. Additional rules-based processing examples are discussed further below.
The business rules in database 220 typically include user-specified rules that are provided by the financial institutions using the transaction processing system 210 for processing financial transactions. For example, user profile information for each sponsoring financial institution can be stored in the database 220 for use by the transaction processing system 210. This profile information may include, for example; business rules specifying one or more various conditions or approaches related to financial transaction processing, as discussed herein. For more information regarding transaction processing in general, and for specific information regarding the use of user profiles and business rules for transactions, as well as computer and processing arrangements and systems for use with the same (and as may be implemented in connection with one or more example einbodiments herein), reference may be made to U.S. Patent Application Serial No. 10/436,878 (USBA.
10 1 PA), entitled "Automated Transaction Processing System and Approach" and filed May 12, 2003, and to U.S. Patent No. 5,910,896 (USBA.002PA) filed November 12, 1996, all of which are incorporated herein by reference.
When the transaction processing system 210 receives transaction data identifying a particular sponsoring financial institution, the database 220 is accessed to retrieve profile information (and corresponding business rules) for processing the transaction data. The business rules are used to determine a variety of transaction-related characteristics, such as fees to be charged for different parties to the transaction, including buyer, seller and their respective financial institutions. Additional rules-based processing examples are discussed further below.
14 The storage of information in the database 220 may involve the use of a single database, or may involve multiple databases, either in a single or at multiple locations, communicatively coupled with the transaction management system 210. In one implementation, all transaction data for all buyers and sellers sponsored by all financial institutions is stored in one centralized database. The transaction management system 210 manages the centralized database such that information in the database that has a common relationship with other information in the database can be cross-referenced and updated.
For instance, where information for a buyer and seller for a single transaction is stored in the centralized database, updates made to the buyer's information can be appropriately made to similar seller's information. This approach can be implemented to ensure that any buyer and any seller can do business with each other and see up-to-date status and documents without latencies typically involved attempting to replicate and synchronize data across inultiple databases.
Business rules stored in the database 220 are optionally tailored to particular users that are being sponsored by the financial institution. In this regard, the business rules pertaining to a particular sponsoring financial institution, as well as the user being sponsored for a particular transaction, are retrieved from the database 220 and used accordingly. In some instances, sponsored users also store profile information in the database 220, such as preferred banlcing institution (i.e., with the sponsoring financial institution simply sponsoring the transaction for a fee and not funding the transaction).
In some instances, the transaction processing system 210 includes two or more system implementations, represented by system implementations 1 and 2 - N.
These system implementations may involve virtually separate implementations at a single location to facilitate data security and continuity for particular sponsoring financial institutions. For instance, each system implementation may be implemented for a particular financial institution, with communication between each system implementation and=other system implementations being facilitated within the transaction processing system 210. In this regard, each user (sponsoring financial institution) may tailor it's specific system implementation to its own needs.
The system implementations with transaction processing system 210 may also be implemented at physically separate locations, with virtual ties to the transaction processing system 210. For example, the implementation of various aspects of the transaction processing system may be appropriate for applications in different countries or for point-of-use type applications (e.g., to reduce long distance data communications).
This physically separate approach may also be implemented, for example, to address laws associated with transactions, including taxation and other processing rules.
5 As discussed above, various business rules stored at the database 220 are implemented by the transaction processing system 210 for a variety of transaction characteristics. One such characteristic involves the determination of fees to be cliarged to users (buyers and sellers), to sponsoring financial institutions and, where.
applicable, to other financial institutions involved in the transaction. In this regard, the database 220 10 stores business rules characterizing these fees, and the transaction processing system 210 uses these characterizing business rules to process financial transactions. In addition, the database 220 may store party-identifying information for use by the fee-based rules in characterizing the fees to be assessed for a particular transaction.
In some applications, the business rules are implemented to arrive at a collaborative
For instance, where information for a buyer and seller for a single transaction is stored in the centralized database, updates made to the buyer's information can be appropriately made to similar seller's information. This approach can be implemented to ensure that any buyer and any seller can do business with each other and see up-to-date status and documents without latencies typically involved attempting to replicate and synchronize data across inultiple databases.
Business rules stored in the database 220 are optionally tailored to particular users that are being sponsored by the financial institution. In this regard, the business rules pertaining to a particular sponsoring financial institution, as well as the user being sponsored for a particular transaction, are retrieved from the database 220 and used accordingly. In some instances, sponsored users also store profile information in the database 220, such as preferred banlcing institution (i.e., with the sponsoring financial institution simply sponsoring the transaction for a fee and not funding the transaction).
In some instances, the transaction processing system 210 includes two or more system implementations, represented by system implementations 1 and 2 - N.
These system implementations may involve virtually separate implementations at a single location to facilitate data security and continuity for particular sponsoring financial institutions. For instance, each system implementation may be implemented for a particular financial institution, with communication between each system implementation and=other system implementations being facilitated within the transaction processing system 210. In this regard, each user (sponsoring financial institution) may tailor it's specific system implementation to its own needs.
The system implementations with transaction processing system 210 may also be implemented at physically separate locations, with virtual ties to the transaction processing system 210. For example, the implementation of various aspects of the transaction processing system may be appropriate for applications in different countries or for point-of-use type applications (e.g., to reduce long distance data communications).
This physically separate approach may also be implemented, for example, to address laws associated with transactions, including taxation and other processing rules.
5 As discussed above, various business rules stored at the database 220 are implemented by the transaction processing system 210 for a variety of transaction characteristics. One such characteristic involves the determination of fees to be cliarged to users (buyers and sellers), to sponsoring financial institutions and, where.
applicable, to other financial institutions involved in the transaction. In this regard, the database 220 10 stores business rules characterizing these fees, and the transaction processing system 210 uses these characterizing business rules to process financial transactions. In addition, the database 220 may store party-identifying information for use by the fee-based rules in characterizing the fees to be assessed for a particular transaction.
In some applications, the business rules are implemented to arrive at a collaborative
15 transaction term, such as a price or other term automatically implemented as an agreed-upon term by using previously agreed-upon business rules for generating such a term. Fee-based rules implemented in connection with these approaches may involve, for example, information for determining the amount of fees to assess for one or more of the following:
fees to be charged to the seller for the transaction based on the identity of the seller and the identity of the seller's sponsoring bank;
fees to be charged to the buyer for this transaction based on the identity of the buyer and the identity of the buyer's sponsoring bank;
fees the seller's sponsoring bank owes the buyer's sponsoring bank for this transaction;
fees the buyer's sponsoring bank owes the seller's sponsoring bank for this transaction; and fees the buyer's sponsoring bank and the seller's sponsoring bank owe the transaction processing system 210 for this transaction.
These collaborative type terms and approaches for implementing the same are selectively carried out using, for example, the transaction processing arrangement 100 shown in FIG. 1 and/or the transaction processing system 210 shown in FIG. 2, with transactions involving buyers and sellers sponsored into the processing network by a
fees to be charged to the seller for the transaction based on the identity of the seller and the identity of the seller's sponsoring bank;
fees to be charged to the buyer for this transaction based on the identity of the buyer and the identity of the buyer's sponsoring bank;
fees the seller's sponsoring bank owes the buyer's sponsoring bank for this transaction;
fees the buyer's sponsoring bank owes the seller's sponsoring bank for this transaction; and fees the buyer's sponsoring bank and the seller's sponsoring bank owe the transaction processing system 210 for this transaction.
These collaborative type terms and approaches for implementing the same are selectively carried out using, for example, the transaction processing arrangement 100 shown in FIG. 1 and/or the transaction processing system 210 shown in FIG. 2, with transactions involving buyers and sellers sponsored into the processing network by a
16 sponsoring bank. In these approaches, for each of a plurality of transactions involving a buyer and a seller, an association processor 212 identifies a particular sponsoring bank for each buyer and seller as a function of stored identifiers. The association identifies respective business rules, set in accordance with the particular sponsoring bank and the particular buyer or seller for which the rules are set, for respectively processing transactions on behalf of the buyer and on behalf of the seller for a particular transaction. These and other association processor 212 functions can be implemented separately from or in connection with (e.g., as a software-implemented function) the transaction processing system 210.
In some applications, the association processor facilitates the identification of business rules using a geographic location of a party to the transaction, for example where transaction payment characteristics are affected by such a location (e.g., where tariffs and/or taxes are involved).
In other applications, the association processor identifies business rules for a sponsoring financial institution using historical information for a particular transaction party. For example, where a financial institution implements different sets of business rules based on payment characteristics, credit rating, business volume or other historical-type information pertaining to a transaction party, that information is used to select a set of business rules to use in facilitating a transaction involving the transaction party.
A collaborative contracts processor uses the identified business rules and a business agreement between the buyer and seller to determine the amount of fees assessed in accordance with one or more of the above fees discussed in connection with the fee-based rules. Other approaches involving a collaborative contracts approach are discussed further below.
Turning back to FIG. 2 and with approaches involving the above assessed fees, the transaction processing system 210 uses information in profiles for facilitating the transfer of funds from, or the extension of credit on behalf of, the entity to which fees are assessed.
For instance, where a particular fee is to be assessed against sponsoring financial institution 230 and/or one of the users 1 - N, funds from that institution are provided directly (e.g., funds transfer) or indirectly (e.g., extension of credit), from the sponsoring financial institution 230 or from another financial institution specified by the user, where applicable.
In some applications, the association processor facilitates the identification of business rules using a geographic location of a party to the transaction, for example where transaction payment characteristics are affected by such a location (e.g., where tariffs and/or taxes are involved).
In other applications, the association processor identifies business rules for a sponsoring financial institution using historical information for a particular transaction party. For example, where a financial institution implements different sets of business rules based on payment characteristics, credit rating, business volume or other historical-type information pertaining to a transaction party, that information is used to select a set of business rules to use in facilitating a transaction involving the transaction party.
A collaborative contracts processor uses the identified business rules and a business agreement between the buyer and seller to determine the amount of fees assessed in accordance with one or more of the above fees discussed in connection with the fee-based rules. Other approaches involving a collaborative contracts approach are discussed further below.
Turning back to FIG. 2 and with approaches involving the above assessed fees, the transaction processing system 210 uses information in profiles for facilitating the transfer of funds from, or the extension of credit on behalf of, the entity to which fees are assessed.
For instance, where a particular fee is to be assessed against sponsoring financial institution 230 and/or one of the users 1 - N, funds from that institution are provided directly (e.g., funds transfer) or indirectly (e.g., extension of credit), from the sponsoring financial institution 230 or from another financial institution specified by the user, where applicable.
17 The user (e.g., buyer, seller and financial institution) profiles discussed herein and implemented with collaborative-type approaches may include a variety of information for use in transaction management and otherwise. In some applications, typical profiles include one or more of the following data: a general ledger chart of accounts, identification of a computer system authorized for submitting contract or transaction data, customer and/or vendor lists, policies for contract, price or transactional approval and business rules. Where individuals within an organization participating in the collaborative-type approaches are selectively authorized, operational roles for such users are defined and include, e.g., access authorization for the users as well as individual access tracking. Seller customer list profiles may also include information further defining the business relationship with the customer from the Seller's perspective, for example, such as a retail buyer relationship or a wholesale buyer relationship. List profiles for buyers who act as vendors (e.g., as a seller or distributor) may also include information further defining the business relationship with the vendor from the Buyer's perspective.
Iri one particular implementation, profile information such as business rules, operational roles, authorization levels and/or other attributes are specific to particular levels and/or individuals within a particular entity. This profile information is stored for access by the transaction processing system 210 and used for implementing transactions.
For example, when a particular financial institution or sponsored user includes different subsidiaries, divisions or locations, profile information can be tailored for the particular source. Certain profile information can also be implemented to supersede other profile information, for example, when a particular subsidiary is assigned different specific pricing terms, relevant to another subsidiary of a common entity.
In another example embodiment facilitating collaborative approaches, the transaction processing system 210 stores information for transaction parties including one or more of financial institutions and sponsored users (e.g., buyers and sellers), and communicates therewitli using an identification approach for users at the buyer and/or seller level. The transaction processing system 210 controls access to the stored information as a function of user identification (ID), with access parameters controlled for processes such as contract modification, price modification, display configuration, access to the stored information for that particular user and others.
Iri one particular implementation, profile information such as business rules, operational roles, authorization levels and/or other attributes are specific to particular levels and/or individuals within a particular entity. This profile information is stored for access by the transaction processing system 210 and used for implementing transactions.
For example, when a particular financial institution or sponsored user includes different subsidiaries, divisions or locations, profile information can be tailored for the particular source. Certain profile information can also be implemented to supersede other profile information, for example, when a particular subsidiary is assigned different specific pricing terms, relevant to another subsidiary of a common entity.
In another example embodiment facilitating collaborative approaches, the transaction processing system 210 stores information for transaction parties including one or more of financial institutions and sponsored users (e.g., buyers and sellers), and communicates therewitli using an identification approach for users at the buyer and/or seller level. The transaction processing system 210 controls access to the stored information as a function of user identification (ID), with access parameters controlled for processes such as contract modification, price modification, display configuration, access to the stored information for that particular user and others.
18 As an example using seller offerings that make up at least part of the stored information for a particular seller as well as buyer access controls, the seller offerings are automatically configured for usage by the individual users. In this context, seller offerings may involve real goods and/or services, as well as or in the alternative to financial offerings, sucli as the extension of credit and/or financial processing services. The automatic configuration may, for example, include price, delivery and payment options.
In response to the seller offerings and other stored information, the transaction processing system 210 is adapted for accepting requests from buyers and communicating the requests to the seller.
The transaction processing system 210 is further adapted for accepting acknowledgment of receipt by the buyer either manually (e.g., an individual buyer logs into the system with a user ID and confirms receipt) or electronically (e.g., buyer's inventory receiving systems automatically generate and transmit a detailed notice of receipt or acceptance). Once receipt or acceptance is acknowledged, the system communicates that acknowledgment to the seller. In one implementation, the system is further adapted for automatically paying the seller in response to the receipt/acceptance acknowledgment. In another implementation, the system is further adapted to invoice the buyer for the offerings. Further, "payment" in this context may involve the drawdown of a credit line, or extension of credit in maimers as appropriate for the particular transaction.
In some applications, the transaction processing system 210 implements a settlement processor 214 in connection with facilitating payment for a particular transaction between a buyer and a seller. The settlement processor 212 performs inter-bank settlement by calculating the amount of funds to be collected from a sponsoring bank for the buyer and remitted to a sponsoring bank for the seller. The settlement is used to fund a payment that the seller's sponsoring bank will make to the seller for all transactions that achieve payable status, e.g., within a payment period defined as a function of the business rules.
The settlement processor 214 is implemented to facilitate payment/settlement in a variety of manners, depending upon the application and appropriate contract terms and other information relative to the truncation parties and/or sponsoring financial institutions involved in a particular transaction. In this regard, some applications involve one or more of the following electronic payment approaches as facilitated by the settlement processor 214 for a transaction involving a buyer and a seller, with sponsoring banks for each. In one approach, the settlement processor 214 facilitates the submission of an electronic payment
In response to the seller offerings and other stored information, the transaction processing system 210 is adapted for accepting requests from buyers and communicating the requests to the seller.
The transaction processing system 210 is further adapted for accepting acknowledgment of receipt by the buyer either manually (e.g., an individual buyer logs into the system with a user ID and confirms receipt) or electronically (e.g., buyer's inventory receiving systems automatically generate and transmit a detailed notice of receipt or acceptance). Once receipt or acceptance is acknowledged, the system communicates that acknowledgment to the seller. In one implementation, the system is further adapted for automatically paying the seller in response to the receipt/acceptance acknowledgment. In another implementation, the system is further adapted to invoice the buyer for the offerings. Further, "payment" in this context may involve the drawdown of a credit line, or extension of credit in maimers as appropriate for the particular transaction.
In some applications, the transaction processing system 210 implements a settlement processor 214 in connection with facilitating payment for a particular transaction between a buyer and a seller. The settlement processor 212 performs inter-bank settlement by calculating the amount of funds to be collected from a sponsoring bank for the buyer and remitted to a sponsoring bank for the seller. The settlement is used to fund a payment that the seller's sponsoring bank will make to the seller for all transactions that achieve payable status, e.g., within a payment period defined as a function of the business rules.
The settlement processor 214 is implemented to facilitate payment/settlement in a variety of manners, depending upon the application and appropriate contract terms and other information relative to the truncation parties and/or sponsoring financial institutions involved in a particular transaction. In this regard, some applications involve one or more of the following electronic payment approaches as facilitated by the settlement processor 214 for a transaction involving a buyer and a seller, with sponsoring banks for each. In one approach, the settlement processor 214 facilitates the submission of an electronic payment
19 demand at a defmed period to the buyer's sponsoring bank for all net monies due to at least one of the transaction processing system and the seller's sponsoring bank, when the buyer's sponsoring bank is in a net funds due (to the transaction processing system) position. In another approach, the settlement processor 214 facilitates the submission of an electronic payment demand at a defined period to the seller's sponsoring bank for all net monies due to at least one of the transaction processing system and the buyer's sponsoring bank, when the seller's sponsoring bank is in a net funds due position. In another approach, the settlement processor 214 facilitates the submission of an electronic payment notice at a defined period to the buyer's sponsoring bank for all net monies due to the buyer's sponsoring bank, after subtraction of funds due to at least one of the transaction processing system and the seller's sponsoring bank, when the buyer's sponsoring bank is in a net funds due to processor position. In still another approach, the settlement processor 214 facilitates the submission of an electronic payinent demand at a defined payment period to the seller's sponsoring bank for all net monies due to the seller's sponsoring bank after subtraction of funds due to at least one of the transaction processing system and the buyer's sponsoring bank, when the seller's sponsoring bank is in a net funds due to processor position. In each of the above approaches, the net funds due to processor position selectively characterizes fiinds due, and in certain applications, characterizes funds due to an administrator of the transaction processing system 210 for transaction payment (e.g., from a buyer to a seller) and/or for fees associated with the processing of the transaction payment.
In another iinpleinentation, the transaction management system discussed in the preceding paragraph is further adapted for accepting a receipt of purchase acknowledgment including receipt characteristics. For example, characteristics such as total acceptance of goods, partial acceptance of goods and rejection of goods at the invoice or receipt line item level can be included in the acknowledgment. These characteristics are tied to transaction levels involving users sponsored by the financial institutions (e.g., 230 or 240, shown by way of example). Where compliance before payment for a transaction is executed is to be ensured, this information is required to be verified a priori. An invoice or invoices for a particular transaction are updated with this and other transaction-fulfillment-related information. Using this approach, problems with received purchases, such as damaged goods, improper goods and improper financial terms are readily addressed. The various invoicing and payment-related characteristics are correspondingly modified (e.g., payment is only made for accepted portions of goods, or credit for the cost of returning goods is granted, or payment is made using only accepted terms such as those relating to an accepted credit-related interest rate).
In a more particular example embodiment, financial institutions approve financial 5 contracts using a collaborative contract manager and submit order and invoice quantities for executing the contracts to the transaction processing system 210 (e.g., implementing a collaborative contract manager). The transaction processing system 210 then uses the terms from the collaborative contracts manager to establish financial processing terms (e.g., credit rate or other cost) between a user of financial services and the corresponding financial 10 service provider. In one instance, financial service providers use the collaborative contracts manager as the central repository called by various provider systems. In another instance, the financial service user implements the collaborative contracts manager as the central repository called by various procurement systems.
For general information regarding the implementation of transaction functions and 15 for specific information regarding collaborative-type functions that can be implemented in connection witli one or more example embodiments discussed herein, reference may be made to U.S. Patent Application Serial Nos. 10/436,878 (USBA.101PA) and 10/437,405 (USBA. 1 17PA), both filed on May 12, 2003 and fully incorporated herein by reference.
In another embodiment, the transaction processing system 210 is configured for
In another iinpleinentation, the transaction management system discussed in the preceding paragraph is further adapted for accepting a receipt of purchase acknowledgment including receipt characteristics. For example, characteristics such as total acceptance of goods, partial acceptance of goods and rejection of goods at the invoice or receipt line item level can be included in the acknowledgment. These characteristics are tied to transaction levels involving users sponsored by the financial institutions (e.g., 230 or 240, shown by way of example). Where compliance before payment for a transaction is executed is to be ensured, this information is required to be verified a priori. An invoice or invoices for a particular transaction are updated with this and other transaction-fulfillment-related information. Using this approach, problems with received purchases, such as damaged goods, improper goods and improper financial terms are readily addressed. The various invoicing and payment-related characteristics are correspondingly modified (e.g., payment is only made for accepted portions of goods, or credit for the cost of returning goods is granted, or payment is made using only accepted terms such as those relating to an accepted credit-related interest rate).
In a more particular example embodiment, financial institutions approve financial 5 contracts using a collaborative contract manager and submit order and invoice quantities for executing the contracts to the transaction processing system 210 (e.g., implementing a collaborative contract manager). The transaction processing system 210 then uses the terms from the collaborative contracts manager to establish financial processing terms (e.g., credit rate or other cost) between a user of financial services and the corresponding financial 10 service provider. In one instance, financial service providers use the collaborative contracts manager as the central repository called by various provider systems. In another instance, the financial service user implements the collaborative contracts manager as the central repository called by various procurement systems.
For general information regarding the implementation of transaction functions and 15 for specific information regarding collaborative-type functions that can be implemented in connection witli one or more example embodiments discussed herein, reference may be made to U.S. Patent Application Serial Nos. 10/436,878 (USBA.101PA) and 10/437,405 (USBA. 1 17PA), both filed on May 12, 2003 and fully incorporated herein by reference.
In another embodiment, the transaction processing system 210 is configured for
20 settling inter-bank issues relating to fees and/or other transaction characteristics. When a buyer and seller enter into a transaction, the transaction processing system 210 calculates the amount of funds to be collected from the buyer's sponsoring bank and remitted to the seller's sponsoring bank. These funds are used to fund the payment that the seller's sponsoring banlc will make to the seller for all transactions that achieve payable status within a particular payment period (e.g., a network day) for the transaction processing system's.
Once the amount of funds to be collected are determined, the transaction processing system 210 further acts to facilitate the collection of these funds in one or more of a variety of manners. For instance, the transaction processing system 210 may simply make the amount of funds known to parties to the transaction using conventional communications methods. In other instances, the transaction processing system 210 actively facilitates collection of these funds.
Once the amount of funds to be collected are determined, the transaction processing system 210 further acts to facilitate the collection of these funds in one or more of a variety of manners. For instance, the transaction processing system 210 may simply make the amount of funds known to parties to the transaction using conventional communications methods. In other instances, the transaction processing system 210 actively facilitates collection of these funds.
21 In one example, an electronic payment demand is submitted on an interval (e.g., at least daily) to the buyer's sponsoring bank for all net monies due either to the transaction processing system or to the seller's sponsoring bank when the buyer's sponsoring bank has net funds due. An electronic payment demand is also submitted on an interval to the seller's sponsoring bank for all net monies due either to the transaction processing system or to the buyer's sponsoring bank when the seller's sponsoring'bank has net funds due.
In addition, an electronic payment notice is submitted on an interval (e.g., at least daily) to the buyer's sponsoring bank for all net monies due to the buyer's sponsoring bank. The net monies due are contemplated after subtraction of funds due to either the transaction processing system or the seller's sponsoring bank when the buyer's sponsoring bank has net funds due. An electronic payment notice is also submitted to the seller's sponsoring bank for all net monies due to the seller's sponsoring bank. Similarly as above, these net monies due are contemplated after subtraction of funds due to either the transaction processing system or the buyer's sponsoring bank when the seller's sponsoring bank has net funds due.
In connection with the various example embodiments discussed in connection with FIG. 2 (and otherwise), a fee engine is selectively implemented to facilitate the assessment of transaction processing fees. In some applications, the fee engine is implemented with a transaction processor (e.g., with transaction processing system 210), as a software-implemented engine. In this regard, fees such as those assessed in accordance with a business relationship between a financial institution and a buyer or seller party contracting therewith, or with a business relationship between a financial institution and an administrative transaction processor auditor, can be assessed using the fee engine. That is, the fee engine applies a fee appropriate for each transaction, and either directly or indirectly facilitates payment of that fee.
Access to information at the database 220 is controlled in one or more of a variety of manners, with information made available to users selectively and in a variety of formats, depending upon the implementation. Various examples using this general approach are discussed below. These examples are selectively implemented with a data access controller 216 and may involve approaches discussed above in connection with similar data access controller fiulctions.
In one example embodiment, each buyer-sponsoring financial institution and each seller-sponsoring institution has access to the transactions naming their sponsored buyer or
In addition, an electronic payment notice is submitted on an interval (e.g., at least daily) to the buyer's sponsoring bank for all net monies due to the buyer's sponsoring bank. The net monies due are contemplated after subtraction of funds due to either the transaction processing system or the seller's sponsoring bank when the buyer's sponsoring bank has net funds due. An electronic payment notice is also submitted to the seller's sponsoring bank for all net monies due to the seller's sponsoring bank. Similarly as above, these net monies due are contemplated after subtraction of funds due to either the transaction processing system or the buyer's sponsoring bank when the seller's sponsoring bank has net funds due.
In connection with the various example embodiments discussed in connection with FIG. 2 (and otherwise), a fee engine is selectively implemented to facilitate the assessment of transaction processing fees. In some applications, the fee engine is implemented with a transaction processor (e.g., with transaction processing system 210), as a software-implemented engine. In this regard, fees such as those assessed in accordance with a business relationship between a financial institution and a buyer or seller party contracting therewith, or with a business relationship between a financial institution and an administrative transaction processor auditor, can be assessed using the fee engine. That is, the fee engine applies a fee appropriate for each transaction, and either directly or indirectly facilitates payment of that fee.
Access to information at the database 220 is controlled in one or more of a variety of manners, with information made available to users selectively and in a variety of formats, depending upon the implementation. Various examples using this general approach are discussed below. These examples are selectively implemented with a data access controller 216 and may involve approaches discussed above in connection with similar data access controller fiulctions.
In one example embodiment, each buyer-sponsoring financial institution and each seller-sponsoring institution has access to the transactions naming their sponsored buyer or
22 seller organization. By enabling such access, each financial institution is granted access to perform customer service functions related to transaction processing for their customers within the transaction processing system. These customer service functions may, for example, include the provision of accounting-relatqd data in an appropriate format and at a selected interval, or include providing a notification to the customer upon certain predefined events related to transaction processing and/or financial status of transactions or accounts.
In addition, each financial institution can maintain an overview of their net position with each of their customers to whom they are issuing credit. The financial institution is presented a view into the transaction processing system that shows their customers' net position between payments due from customer and payments due to suppliers (througli the transaction processing system).
In another embodiment, each buyer-sponsoring financial institution has the capability, as enabled by user profiles stored at the database 220, to specify a variety of bank-specific operating characteristics. For example, each buyer-sponsoring financial institution may specify the financial institution that is to perfonn foreign currency translation on its sponsored buyer's behalf. This approach may be implemented, for example, where the seller desires to be paid in currency local to the seller and the buyer desires to be billed in currency local to the buyer. Each buyer-sponsoring financial institution may also specify a currency translation markup amount to add to translation services being provided to its buyers. The buyer-sponsoring financial institution may also specify the financial institution to use for remittance collection from its buyers. For general information regarding transaction processing, and for specific currency conversion implementations that may be implemented in connection with currency conversion as discussed here in connection with FIG. 2, reference may be made to U.S. Patent Application Serial No. 11/104,394 (USBA.134PA), filed on April 12, 2005 and entitled "Automated Transaction Processing System and Approach witli Currency Conversion," which is fully incorporated herein by reference.
Seller-sponsoring institutions may also specify the financial institution(s) to use for delivering payments to the seller. For instance, one institution may be used for ACH
origination for sellers holding US-domiciled bank accounts and another institution (e.g., a SWIFT institution) for European-based sellers, and another for Latin American-based sellers.
In addition, each financial institution can maintain an overview of their net position with each of their customers to whom they are issuing credit. The financial institution is presented a view into the transaction processing system that shows their customers' net position between payments due from customer and payments due to suppliers (througli the transaction processing system).
In another embodiment, each buyer-sponsoring financial institution has the capability, as enabled by user profiles stored at the database 220, to specify a variety of bank-specific operating characteristics. For example, each buyer-sponsoring financial institution may specify the financial institution that is to perfonn foreign currency translation on its sponsored buyer's behalf. This approach may be implemented, for example, where the seller desires to be paid in currency local to the seller and the buyer desires to be billed in currency local to the buyer. Each buyer-sponsoring financial institution may also specify a currency translation markup amount to add to translation services being provided to its buyers. The buyer-sponsoring financial institution may also specify the financial institution to use for remittance collection from its buyers. For general information regarding transaction processing, and for specific currency conversion implementations that may be implemented in connection with currency conversion as discussed here in connection with FIG. 2, reference may be made to U.S. Patent Application Serial No. 11/104,394 (USBA.134PA), filed on April 12, 2005 and entitled "Automated Transaction Processing System and Approach witli Currency Conversion," which is fully incorporated herein by reference.
Seller-sponsoring institutions may also specify the financial institution(s) to use for delivering payments to the seller. For instance, one institution may be used for ACH
origination for sellers holding US-domiciled bank accounts and another institution (e.g., a SWIFT institution) for European-based sellers, and another for Latin American-based sellers.
23 Financial institutions issuing credit to either the buyer or the seller can also specify where credit-related information is retrieved from for use in the transaction.
For example, the location from which credit drawdown advice (e.g., relative to available credit in an appropriate credit account) is to be delivered can be specified. In addition, credit-issuing financial institutions can specify whether the drawdown advice is to include transaction details or simply be the aggregate of the transaction details for the reporting period. For the latter case, the transaction processing system 210 can be specified to be used as the detailed subledger to support the credit usage. In this sense, the transaction processing system 210 functions inuch like conventional credit-issuing institutions (including credit card issuing institutions), with the credit issuer being provided summary or detail information.
A variety of security-related functions are implemented witli the transaction management system 210, depending upon the application and the desired level of security.
For example, in some implementations, data flowing to the transaction processing system 210 from sponsoring financial institutions (230, 240) are encrypted using standard encryption technologies. Similarly, data flowing from the transaction processing system 210 to sponsoring financial institutions (230, 240) can also be encrypted using standard encryption technologies. Communications between any distributed computing devices and the transaction processing system 210 can also be encrypted using standard encryption technologies. For instance, where the various system implementations 1, 2 and N are employed at physically different locations, communication between these system implementations and the transaction management system 210 is encrypted.
In addition to security-related functions for transaction communications, access to data within the transaction processing system 210 can also be controlled using security measures. For instance, profiles stored in the database 220 may include security type information, such as password and/or encryption information that users accessing the transaction management system 210 may employ.
In some instances, the transaction processing system 210 addresses synchronization issues between various financial institutions and organizations, such as those discussed above, by implementing pricing and/or other transaction rules that have previously been agreed upon such that disputes over transaction price are typically eliminated. These rules may include, for example, criterion defining pricing data that can be automatically approved (e.g., transaction fees within a selected variance), and also control pricing information made
For example, the location from which credit drawdown advice (e.g., relative to available credit in an appropriate credit account) is to be delivered can be specified. In addition, credit-issuing financial institutions can specify whether the drawdown advice is to include transaction details or simply be the aggregate of the transaction details for the reporting period. For the latter case, the transaction processing system 210 can be specified to be used as the detailed subledger to support the credit usage. In this sense, the transaction processing system 210 functions inuch like conventional credit-issuing institutions (including credit card issuing institutions), with the credit issuer being provided summary or detail information.
A variety of security-related functions are implemented witli the transaction management system 210, depending upon the application and the desired level of security.
For example, in some implementations, data flowing to the transaction processing system 210 from sponsoring financial institutions (230, 240) are encrypted using standard encryption technologies. Similarly, data flowing from the transaction processing system 210 to sponsoring financial institutions (230, 240) can also be encrypted using standard encryption technologies. Communications between any distributed computing devices and the transaction processing system 210 can also be encrypted using standard encryption technologies. For instance, where the various system implementations 1, 2 and N are employed at physically different locations, communication between these system implementations and the transaction management system 210 is encrypted.
In addition to security-related functions for transaction communications, access to data within the transaction processing system 210 can also be controlled using security measures. For instance, profiles stored in the database 220 may include security type information, such as password and/or encryption information that users accessing the transaction management system 210 may employ.
In some instances, the transaction processing system 210 addresses synchronization issues between various financial institutions and organizations, such as those discussed above, by implementing pricing and/or other transaction rules that have previously been agreed upon such that disputes over transaction price are typically eliminated. These rules may include, for example, criterion defining pricing data that can be automatically approved (e.g., transaction fees within a selected variance), and also control pricing information made
24 available to different users. The pricing rules may also include, for example, prices associated with particular transaction characteristics, with different prices being assigned for particular transactions (e.g., such as with a volume or amount discount).
In various other example embodiments of the present invention, a credit-processing approach is implemented with a transaction management arrangement, such as that shown in FIG. 2 and discussed above. For example, the transaction processing system 210 can facilitate the extension of credit on behalf of one or more sponsoring financial institutions, or another financial institution, in connection with a particular user participant in a transaction.
In one such credit-processing implementation, a buyer-sponsoriing bank sponsors a buyer into the transaction processing system 210 and network witll an active connection to a line of credit for usage within the transaction processing system and network.
The buyer creates trading partner relationships with sellers who are sponsored into the transaction processing system 210, wliicll facilitates the relationships and related transaction processing. When a buyer makes a purchase from a seller, the buyer sends an electronic copy of an order for the purchase to the transaction processing system 210 and network.
The seller fulfills an order and issues an invoice electronically to the transaction processing system 210.
Where particular events are to occur and/or conditions are to be met before an invoice becomes payable, these events or conditions are provided by an appropriate party to a transaction (e.g., buyer, seller or third party (such as customs or a freight forwarder)).
These events and/or conditions can be specified using business rules as discussed above, with the transaction processing system 210 implementing the business rules.
The transaction processing system 210 uses business rules and/or profiles for users to match incoming information such as order, invoice, receipt and/or event notices. This incoming information is audited and reconciled by the transaction processing system 210 using appropriate business rules. For example, where a buyer establishes profiles, the transaction processing system 210 implements those profiles to audit and reconcile the information.
Where payment is ripe as determined, e.g., via an audit as discussed above, and where payment is via the extension of credit, the transaction processing system 210 verifies that the extension of credit to the buyer and/or associated buyer party is appropriate. Where the extension of credit is appropriate, the transaction processing system 210 sends authorization to the appropriate financial institution following rules established by that financial institution via profiles within the transaction processing system.
When authorization is received and all other conditions required for payment are 5 met, the transaction processing system and network electronically funds a seller with a single payment across all credit issuing institutions via a funds delivery pathway specified in the seller-sponsoring financial institution's profile. In some instances, the cost to the seller for this payment is varied based on the financial institution supplying the credit. The funds are delivered to the seller net of the seller-sponsoring bank's fees to the seller (e.g., 10 fees are withheld prior to delivery of payment). The seller-sponsoring financial institution uses the pricing capabilities of the transaction processing system and network to compute and render the bill to the seller. Detailed data supporting the payment continues to be resident in the transaction processing system and network and does not add overhead to the banking industries money movement networks.
15 In connection with the authorization above, the transaction processing system 210 provides the buyer-sponsoring bank with a data feed that enables it to update its credit line to the buyer to acknowledge the draw down of that credit line to pay invoices.
In some instances, the buyer-sponsoring bank will also use the transaction processing system 210 to calculate and render the invoice to the bank's buyer customer, and facilitates the linking of 20 transaction data to the invoice. In these instances, the buyer-sponsoring bank provides the transaction processing system 210 with information for processing the invoice accordingly, in profile and/or business rule information.
FIG. 3 shows a flow diagram for transaction processing involving the association of a particular financial institution with a transaction, according to another example
In various other example embodiments of the present invention, a credit-processing approach is implemented with a transaction management arrangement, such as that shown in FIG. 2 and discussed above. For example, the transaction processing system 210 can facilitate the extension of credit on behalf of one or more sponsoring financial institutions, or another financial institution, in connection with a particular user participant in a transaction.
In one such credit-processing implementation, a buyer-sponsoriing bank sponsors a buyer into the transaction processing system 210 and network witll an active connection to a line of credit for usage within the transaction processing system and network.
The buyer creates trading partner relationships with sellers who are sponsored into the transaction processing system 210, wliicll facilitates the relationships and related transaction processing. When a buyer makes a purchase from a seller, the buyer sends an electronic copy of an order for the purchase to the transaction processing system 210 and network.
The seller fulfills an order and issues an invoice electronically to the transaction processing system 210.
Where particular events are to occur and/or conditions are to be met before an invoice becomes payable, these events or conditions are provided by an appropriate party to a transaction (e.g., buyer, seller or third party (such as customs or a freight forwarder)).
These events and/or conditions can be specified using business rules as discussed above, with the transaction processing system 210 implementing the business rules.
The transaction processing system 210 uses business rules and/or profiles for users to match incoming information such as order, invoice, receipt and/or event notices. This incoming information is audited and reconciled by the transaction processing system 210 using appropriate business rules. For example, where a buyer establishes profiles, the transaction processing system 210 implements those profiles to audit and reconcile the information.
Where payment is ripe as determined, e.g., via an audit as discussed above, and where payment is via the extension of credit, the transaction processing system 210 verifies that the extension of credit to the buyer and/or associated buyer party is appropriate. Where the extension of credit is appropriate, the transaction processing system 210 sends authorization to the appropriate financial institution following rules established by that financial institution via profiles within the transaction processing system.
When authorization is received and all other conditions required for payment are 5 met, the transaction processing system and network electronically funds a seller with a single payment across all credit issuing institutions via a funds delivery pathway specified in the seller-sponsoring financial institution's profile. In some instances, the cost to the seller for this payment is varied based on the financial institution supplying the credit. The funds are delivered to the seller net of the seller-sponsoring bank's fees to the seller (e.g., 10 fees are withheld prior to delivery of payment). The seller-sponsoring financial institution uses the pricing capabilities of the transaction processing system and network to compute and render the bill to the seller. Detailed data supporting the payment continues to be resident in the transaction processing system and network and does not add overhead to the banking industries money movement networks.
15 In connection with the authorization above, the transaction processing system 210 provides the buyer-sponsoring bank with a data feed that enables it to update its credit line to the buyer to acknowledge the draw down of that credit line to pay invoices.
In some instances, the buyer-sponsoring bank will also use the transaction processing system 210 to calculate and render the invoice to the bank's buyer customer, and facilitates the linking of 20 transaction data to the invoice. In these instances, the buyer-sponsoring bank provides the transaction processing system 210 with information for processing the invoice accordingly, in profile and/or business rule information.
FIG. 3 shows a flow diagram for transaction processing involving the association of a particular financial institution with a transaction, according to another example
25 embodiment of the present invention. At block 310, transaction data having financial transaction identification information is received from a user node. The financial transaction identification information may include identification data that pertains, for example, to a particular party to the transaction, to a financial institution or to other identification information specific to the particular transaction to which it applies. At block 320, the financial transaction data is compared with financial institution identification data.
If no match between the financial transaction data and a financial institution is found at
If no match between the financial transaction data and a financial institution is found at
26 block 330, a failure notice is returned to a sender at block 335 indicating that the transaction cannot be processed.
If a match between the financial transaction data and a financial institution is found at block 330, transaction processing data corresponding to the match is loaded at block 340.
In some instances, this loaded transaction processing information includes information exclusively provided by a financial institution that is the subject of the match. In otlier instances, the loaded transaction processing data includes information for parties to the transaction in addition to the financial institution that is the subject of the match (e.g., for specifying user preferences or profiles as discussed above).
After the transaction processing data has been loaded, it is used to audit the transaction data at block 350 for facilitating financial aspects of the transaction. The audit generally involves parsing the financial transaction data using loaded processing data such as rules that can be iinplemented to specify whether the financial transaction data indicates that payment can be made. For instance, a price term engine can be used to derive a payment amount for the financial transaction, using information in the financial transaction data and in the loaded transaction data (e.g., specifying pre-agreed contract terms used in arriving at a price). Such a price term can be used for setting the price of one or more aspects of the financial transaction data. The audit is then used at block 360 to generate a payment term for the transaction, and the payment term is used to facilitate payment for the transaction. In this regard, the payment term may include one or more of a payment amount, a time of payment, a credit term, a method of payment or a source from wliere to draw the payment.
While certain aspects of the present invention have been described with reference to several particular example embodiments, those skilled in the art will recognize that many changes may be made thereto without departing from the spirit and scope of the present invention, aspects of which are set forth in the following claims.
If a match between the financial transaction data and a financial institution is found at block 330, transaction processing data corresponding to the match is loaded at block 340.
In some instances, this loaded transaction processing information includes information exclusively provided by a financial institution that is the subject of the match. In otlier instances, the loaded transaction processing data includes information for parties to the transaction in addition to the financial institution that is the subject of the match (e.g., for specifying user preferences or profiles as discussed above).
After the transaction processing data has been loaded, it is used to audit the transaction data at block 350 for facilitating financial aspects of the transaction. The audit generally involves parsing the financial transaction data using loaded processing data such as rules that can be iinplemented to specify whether the financial transaction data indicates that payment can be made. For instance, a price term engine can be used to derive a payment amount for the financial transaction, using information in the financial transaction data and in the loaded transaction data (e.g., specifying pre-agreed contract terms used in arriving at a price). Such a price term can be used for setting the price of one or more aspects of the financial transaction data. The audit is then used at block 360 to generate a payment term for the transaction, and the payment term is used to facilitate payment for the transaction. In this regard, the payment term may include one or more of a payment amount, a time of payment, a credit term, a method of payment or a source from wliere to draw the payment.
While certain aspects of the present invention have been described with reference to several particular example embodiments, those skilled in the art will recognize that many changes may be made thereto without departing from the spirit and scope of the present invention, aspects of which are set forth in the following claims.
Claims (25)
1. An automated transaction processing system and network for processing transactions for buyers and sellers sponsored into the processing network by a sponsoring bank, the system comprising:
an association processor configured and arranged, for each of a plurality of transactions involving a buyer and a seller, to identify a particular sponsoring bank for each buyer and seller as a function of stored identifiers, the association identifying respective business rules, set in accordance with the particular sponsoring bank and the particular buyer or seller for which the rules are set, for respectively processing transactions on behalf of the buyer and on behalf of the seller for a particular transaction; and a collaborative contracts processor configured and arranged, for each particular transaction involving a buyer and a seller, to use the identified business rules and a business agreement between the buyer and seller to determine the amount of fees that should be charged to the seller, should charged to the buyer as a function of the identity of the buyer and the identity of the buyer's sponsoring bank, the seller's sponsoring bank owes the buyer's sponsoring bank, the buyer's sponsoring bank owes the seller's sponsoring bank, and the buyer's sponsoring bank and the seller's sponsoring bank owe the automated transaction processing system and network.
an association processor configured and arranged, for each of a plurality of transactions involving a buyer and a seller, to identify a particular sponsoring bank for each buyer and seller as a function of stored identifiers, the association identifying respective business rules, set in accordance with the particular sponsoring bank and the particular buyer or seller for which the rules are set, for respectively processing transactions on behalf of the buyer and on behalf of the seller for a particular transaction; and a collaborative contracts processor configured and arranged, for each particular transaction involving a buyer and a seller, to use the identified business rules and a business agreement between the buyer and seller to determine the amount of fees that should be charged to the seller, should charged to the buyer as a function of the identity of the buyer and the identity of the buyer's sponsoring bank, the seller's sponsoring bank owes the buyer's sponsoring bank, the buyer's sponsoring bank owes the seller's sponsoring bank, and the buyer's sponsoring bank and the seller's sponsoring bank owe the automated transaction processing system and network.
2. The automated transaction processing system and network of claim 1, further comprising a settlement processor configured and arranged, for each particular transaction involving a buyer and a seller, to:
perform inter-bank settlement by calculating the amount of funds to be collected from the buyer's sponsoring bank and remitted to the seller's sponsoring bank to fund a payment that the seller's sponsoring bank will make to the seller for all transactions that achieve payable status within a payment period defined as a function of the business rules.
perform inter-bank settlement by calculating the amount of funds to be collected from the buyer's sponsoring bank and remitted to the seller's sponsoring bank to fund a payment that the seller's sponsoring bank will make to the seller for all transactions that achieve payable status within a payment period defined as a function of the business rules.
3. The automated transaction processing system and network of claim 2, wherein the settlement processor is configured and arranged, for each particular transaction involving a buyer and a seller, to:
submit an electronic payment demand at a defined period to the buyer's sponsoring bank for all net monies due to at least one of the transaction processing system and the seller's sponsoring bank, when the buyer's sponsoring bank is in a net funds due to processor position;
submit an electronic payment demand at a defined period to the seller's sponsoring bank for all net monies due to at least one of the transaction processing system and the buyer's sponsoring bank, when the seller's sponsoring bank is in a net funds due to processor position;
submit an electronic payment notice at a defined period to the buyer's sponsoring bank for all net monies due the buyer's sponsoring bank after subtraction of funds due to at least one of the transaction processing system and the seller's sponsoring bank, when the buyer's sponsoring bank is in a net funds due to processor position; and submit an electronic payment demand at a defined payment period to the seller's sponsoring bank for all net monies due to the seller's sponsoring bank after subtraction of funds due to at least one of the transaction processing system and the buyer's sponsoring bank, when the seller's sponsoring bank is in a net funds due to processor position.
submit an electronic payment demand at a defined period to the buyer's sponsoring bank for all net monies due to at least one of the transaction processing system and the seller's sponsoring bank, when the buyer's sponsoring bank is in a net funds due to processor position;
submit an electronic payment demand at a defined period to the seller's sponsoring bank for all net monies due to at least one of the transaction processing system and the buyer's sponsoring bank, when the seller's sponsoring bank is in a net funds due to processor position;
submit an electronic payment notice at a defined period to the buyer's sponsoring bank for all net monies due the buyer's sponsoring bank after subtraction of funds due to at least one of the transaction processing system and the seller's sponsoring bank, when the buyer's sponsoring bank is in a net funds due to processor position; and submit an electronic payment demand at a defined payment period to the seller's sponsoring bank for all net monies due to the seller's sponsoring bank after subtraction of funds due to at least one of the transaction processing system and the buyer's sponsoring bank, when the seller's sponsoring bank is in a net funds due to processor position.
4. The automated transaction processing system and network of claim 1, further comprising a data access controller configured and arranged, for each sponsoring financial institution, to:
provide access to transactions naming a buyer or seller organization sponsored by the sponsoring financial institution; and maintain an overview of their net position with each of their customers to whom they are issuing credit, the overview showing each customer's net position between payments due from the customer and payments due to suppliers through the transaction processing system.
provide access to transactions naming a buyer or seller organization sponsored by the sponsoring financial institution; and maintain an overview of their net position with each of their customers to whom they are issuing credit, the overview showing each customer's net position between payments due from the customer and payments due to suppliers through the transaction processing system.
5. The automated transaction processing system and network of claim 4, wherein the data access controller is further configured and arranged, for each sponsoring financial institution, to perform customer service functions related to transaction processing for their customers within the transaction processing system, the customer service functions defined in the sponsoring financial institution's business rules in association with each customer.
6. The automated transaction processing system and network of claim 1, wherein the collaborative contracts processor is configured and arranged to implement profiles for each sponsoring financial institution for specifying bank-specific operating characteristics to use in processing transactions involving the sponsoring financial institution.
7. The automated transaction processing system and network of claim 6, wherein the collaborative contracts processor is configured and arranged to perform a currency conversion using a financial institution to process the currency conversion as specified in the profile for a particular sponsoring financial institution.
8. The automated transaction processing system and network of claim 7, wherein the collaborative contracts processor is configured and arranged to assess a markup fee to a sponsored user as a function of profiles for the particular sponsoring financial institution's profile.
9. The automated transaction processing system and network of claim 6, wherein the collaborative contracts processor is configured and arranged to use information in the profiles to identify a financial institution to use for remittance collection from buyers sponsored by the sponsoring financial institution.
10. The automated transaction processing system and network of claim 6, wherein the collaborative contracts processor is configured and arranged to use information in the profiles to identify a financial institution that the sponsoring financial institution specifies to use for payments to each seller sponsored by the sponsoring financial institution.
11. The automated transaction processing system of claim 10, wherein the collaborative contracts processor is configured and arranged to use information in the profiles to identify a financial institution that the sponsoring financial institution wants to use for payments to each seller sponsored by the sponsoring financial institution, as a function of a geographical location of each seller.
12. The automated transaction processing system and network of claim 6, wherein the collaborative contracts processor is configured and arranged to use information in the profiles to identify a location to which credit drawdown advice is to be delivered and to specify the content of the credit drawdown advice
13. The automated transaction processing system and network of claim 1, further comprising a data storage arrangement configured and arranged for storing all transaction data for transactions involving sponsored buyers and sellers, and to provide access to all of the transaction data to the collaborative contracts processor.
14. The automated transaction processing system and network of claim 13, wherein the data storage arrangement includes at least two different databanks connected via a network link.
15. The automated transaction processing system and network of claim 1, wherein the association processor is configured and arranged to identify a particular set of business rules to implement for a particular transaction as a function of a credit term associated with the particular transaction.
16. The automated transaction processing system and network of claim 1, wherein the association processor is configured and arranged to identify a particular set of business rules to implement for a particular transaction as a function of the geographic location of at least one party to the particular transaction.
17. The automated transaction processing system and network of claim 1, wherein the association processor is configured and arranged to identify a particular set of business rules to implement for a particular transaction as a function of historical information associated with at least one party to the particular transaction.
18. The automated transaction processing system and network of claim 1, wherein the association processor is configured and arranged to store and implement identifiers to identify a particular sponsoring bank for each of the buyer and seller by storing and implementing user profiles for each buyer and seller, the user profiles specifying the identifiers that identify a particular sponsoring bank for each buyer and seller.
19. The automated transaction processing system and network of claim 18, wherein the association processor is configured and arranged to store and implement user profiles, for each buyer and seller, that specify a non-sponsoring financial institution that the buyer or seller wishes to use with the transfer of funds for transactions.
20. The automated transaction processing system and network of claim 19, wherein the association processor is configured and arranged to select a store and implement user profiles, for each buyer and seller, that specify a non-sponsoring financial institution as a function of at least one of: the amount of a particular transaction, the type of a purchase associated with the transaction, the location of a purchase associated with the transaction, taxes on the transaction, the interest rate available from the financial institution, and insurance for the transaction.
21. The automated transaction processing system and network of claim 1, wherein the collaborative contracts processor configured and arranged, for each particular transaction, to use the identified business rules to select ACH (automatic clearing house) outbound payment & facilitation functions to implement for each particular transaction.
22. A method for auditing transactions between contracting parties on behalf of a plurality of financial institutions, the method comprising:
associating each transaction with a unique one of the plurality of financial institutions;
auditing each transaction according to a set of transaction rules defined as a function of the unique financial institution and a business relationship between the unique financial institution and at least one of the contracting parties, and facilitating payment for each transaction as a function of the audit.
associating each transaction with a unique one of the plurality of financial institutions;
auditing each transaction according to a set of transaction rules defined as a function of the unique financial institution and a business relationship between the unique financial institution and at least one of the contracting parties, and facilitating payment for each transaction as a function of the audit.
23. The method of claim 22, further comprising, for each transaction, defining a set of transaction rules for a unique financial institution associated with the transaction as a function of the unique financial institution and a business relationship between the unique financial institution and at least one of the contracting parties.
24. A system for auditing transactions between contracting parties on behalf of a plurality of financial institutions, the system comprising:
means for associating each transaction with a unique one of the plurality of financial institutions;
means for auditing each transaction according to a set of transaction rules defined as a function of the unique financial institution and a business relationship between the unique financial institution and at least one of the contracting parties, and means for facilitating payment for each transaction as a function of the audit.
means for associating each transaction with a unique one of the plurality of financial institutions;
means for auditing each transaction according to a set of transaction rules defined as a function of the unique financial institution and a business relationship between the unique financial institution and at least one of the contracting parties, and means for facilitating payment for each transaction as a function of the audit.
25. A method for processing transactions for buyers and sellers sponsored into a processing network by a sponsoring bank, the method comprising:
for each of a plurality of transactions involving a buyer and a seller, identifying a particular sponsoring bank for each buyer and seller as a function of stored identifiers, the association identifying respective business rules, set in accordance with the particular sponsoring bank and the particular buyer or seller for which the rules are set, for respectively processing transactions on behalf of the buyer and on behalf of the seller for a particular transaction; and for each particular transaction involving a buyer and a seller, use the identified business rules and a business agreement between the buyer and seller to determine the amount of fees that should be charged to the seller, should charged to the buyer as a function of the identity of the buyer and the identity of the buyer's sponsoring bank, the seller's sponsoring bank owes the buyer's sponsoring bank, the buyer's sponsoring bank owes the seller's sponsoring bank, and the buyer's sponsoring bank and the seller's sponsoring bank owe the automated transaction processing system and network.
for each of a plurality of transactions involving a buyer and a seller, identifying a particular sponsoring bank for each buyer and seller as a function of stored identifiers, the association identifying respective business rules, set in accordance with the particular sponsoring bank and the particular buyer or seller for which the rules are set, for respectively processing transactions on behalf of the buyer and on behalf of the seller for a particular transaction; and for each particular transaction involving a buyer and a seller, use the identified business rules and a business agreement between the buyer and seller to determine the amount of fees that should be charged to the seller, should charged to the buyer as a function of the identity of the buyer and the identity of the buyer's sponsoring bank, the seller's sponsoring bank owes the buyer's sponsoring bank, the buyer's sponsoring bank owes the seller's sponsoring bank, and the buyer's sponsoring bank and the seller's sponsoring bank owe the automated transaction processing system and network.
Applications Claiming Priority (3)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US57837504P | 2004-06-09 | 2004-06-09 | |
US60/578,375 | 2004-06-09 | ||
PCT/US2005/020622 WO2005124635A2 (en) | 2004-06-09 | 2005-06-09 | Financial institution-based transaction processing system and approach |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
CA2569338A1 true CA2569338A1 (en) | 2005-12-29 |
Family
ID=35510405
Family Applications (3)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
CA002569338A Abandoned CA2569338A1 (en) | 2004-06-09 | 2005-06-09 | Financial institution-based transaction processing system and approach |
CA 2568584 Abandoned CA2568584A1 (en) | 2004-06-09 | 2005-06-09 | Transaction processing with core and distributor processor implementations |
CA 2569351 Abandoned CA2569351A1 (en) | 2004-06-09 | 2005-06-09 | Distributor-based transaction processing arrangement and approach |
Family Applications After (2)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
CA 2568584 Abandoned CA2568584A1 (en) | 2004-06-09 | 2005-06-09 | Transaction processing with core and distributor processor implementations |
CA 2569351 Abandoned CA2569351A1 (en) | 2004-06-09 | 2005-06-09 | Distributor-based transaction processing arrangement and approach |
Country Status (7)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (2) | US8560439B2 (en) |
EP (3) | EP1782259A4 (en) |
CN (3) | CN101027687A (en) |
AU (4) | AU2005255453B2 (en) |
CA (3) | CA2569338A1 (en) |
MX (3) | MXPA06014351A (en) |
WO (3) | WO2005124640A2 (en) |
Families Citing this family (41)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20070055582A1 (en) | 1996-11-12 | 2007-03-08 | Hahn-Carlson Dean W | Transaction processing with core and distributor processor implementations |
US8396811B1 (en) | 1999-02-26 | 2013-03-12 | Syncada Llc | Validation approach for auditing a vendor-based transaction |
US20080172314A1 (en) | 1996-11-12 | 2008-07-17 | Hahn-Carlson Dean W | Financial institution-based transaction processing system and approach |
US8392285B2 (en) | 1996-11-12 | 2013-03-05 | Syncada Llc | Multi-supplier transaction and payment programmed processing approach with at least one supplier |
US20050165699A1 (en) * | 1996-11-12 | 2005-07-28 | Hahn-Carlson Dean W. | Processing and management of transaction timing characteristics |
US7822679B1 (en) * | 2001-10-29 | 2010-10-26 | Visa U.S.A. Inc. | Method and system for conducting a commercial transaction between a buyer and a seller |
CA2569338A1 (en) | 2004-06-09 | 2005-12-29 | U.S. Bancorp Licensing, Inc. | Financial institution-based transaction processing system and approach |
CA2569346A1 (en) | 2004-06-09 | 2005-12-29 | U.S. Bancorp Licensing, Inc. | Order-resource fulfillment and management system and approach |
US8762238B2 (en) | 2004-06-09 | 2014-06-24 | Syncada Llc | Recurring transaction processing system and approach |
US20060167792A1 (en) * | 2004-12-29 | 2006-07-27 | Hahn-Carlson Dean W | Multi-supplier transaction and payment programmed processing system and approach |
US7970671B2 (en) * | 2005-04-12 | 2011-06-28 | Syncada Llc | Automated transaction processing system and approach with currency conversion |
EP2409714A1 (en) * | 2006-06-27 | 2012-01-25 | Sanofi Pasteur VaxDesign Corporation | Models for vaccine assessment |
US20110029404A1 (en) * | 2006-10-06 | 2011-02-03 | Hahn-Carlson Dean W | Transaction payables processing system and approach |
US8712884B2 (en) | 2006-10-06 | 2014-04-29 | Syncada Llc | Transaction finance processing system and approach |
US7725372B2 (en) * | 2006-10-06 | 2010-05-25 | Syncada Llc | Transaction payables processing system and approach |
US20080114684A1 (en) * | 2006-10-31 | 2008-05-15 | Chuck Foster | Termination of transactions |
US8060437B2 (en) | 2006-10-31 | 2011-11-15 | International Funding Partners Llc | Automatic termination of electronic transactions |
US20080103966A1 (en) * | 2006-10-31 | 2008-05-01 | Chuck Foster | System and/or method for dynamic determination of transaction processing fees |
US8419527B2 (en) * | 2006-11-09 | 2013-04-16 | Wms Gaming, Inc. | Wagering game account management system |
US20090112759A1 (en) * | 2007-10-30 | 2009-04-30 | Chuck Foster | Accumulated transactions |
US8751337B2 (en) | 2008-01-25 | 2014-06-10 | Syncada Llc | Inventory-based payment processing system and approach |
US8439746B2 (en) | 2008-05-07 | 2013-05-14 | Wms Gaming, Inc. | Managing limitation rules for wagering accounts |
US8010450B2 (en) * | 2008-05-19 | 2011-08-30 | GE Corporate Finanical Services, Inc. | Systems and methods for processing commercial financial transactions |
EP2321776A4 (en) * | 2008-07-21 | 2012-01-04 | Syncada Llc | Resource-allocation processing system and approach with adaptive-assessment processing |
WO2010011681A1 (en) * | 2008-07-21 | 2010-01-28 | Syncada Llc | Resource-allocation processing system and approach with resource pooling |
GB2467530A (en) * | 2009-02-03 | 2010-08-11 | Eservglobal Uk Ltd | Credit transfer between telecommunications networks |
CN102053872B (en) * | 2009-11-06 | 2013-11-20 | 中国银联股份有限公司 | Method for testing transaction performance of terminal |
US20130030926A1 (en) | 2011-07-28 | 2013-01-31 | American Express Travel Related Services Company, Inc. | Systems and methods for generating and using a digital pass |
US8671054B2 (en) * | 2012-05-18 | 2014-03-11 | Jpmorgan Chase Bank, N.A. | Dynamic management and netting of transactions using executable rules |
AU2013300455B2 (en) * | 2012-08-08 | 2016-09-01 | Yoshimitsu Kagiwada | Transaction support system |
US10134081B2 (en) | 2012-08-15 | 2018-11-20 | Visa International Service Association | Single order multiple payment processing |
US9299049B2 (en) * | 2013-03-15 | 2016-03-29 | Sap Se | Contract-based process integration |
CN110603557B (en) * | 2017-03-16 | 2024-04-12 | 香港物流及供应链管理应用技术研发中心 | System and method for controlling transaction ledger |
CN107292740B (en) * | 2017-06-16 | 2018-03-30 | 昆明电力交易中心有限责任公司 | A kind of monthly independently listed electricity transaction system and method for commerce |
CN107038630A (en) * | 2017-06-16 | 2017-08-11 | 昆明电力交易中心有限责任公司 | A kind of bilateral negotiation electricity transaction system and method |
CN117333186A (en) * | 2017-07-05 | 2024-01-02 | 创新先进技术有限公司 | Acquisition method of credit information and establishment method and device of credit management and control rule |
TW201911159A (en) * | 2017-07-31 | 2019-03-16 | 臺灣金融科技股份有限公司 | Third-party aid payment system and method |
WO2020056396A1 (en) * | 2018-09-14 | 2020-03-19 | Jpmorgan Chase Bank, N.A. | System and method for implementing transaction processing ecosystems |
CN110782297B (en) * | 2019-10-25 | 2022-09-09 | 杭州火小二科技有限公司 | Electronic invoice billing method and device |
US11429476B2 (en) | 2021-01-07 | 2022-08-30 | The Toronto-Dominion Bank | Method and system for detecting data corruption |
JP2022181684A (en) * | 2021-05-26 | 2022-12-08 | 富士フイルムビジネスイノベーション株式会社 | Program and information processing apparatus |
Family Cites Families (457)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US4412287A (en) * | 1975-05-29 | 1983-10-25 | Braddock Iii Walter D | Automated stock exchange |
US4114027A (en) * | 1976-09-13 | 1978-09-12 | The Mosler Safe Company | On-line/off-line automated banking system |
US4270042A (en) * | 1977-08-01 | 1981-05-26 | Case John M | Electronic funds transfer system |
FR2543327A1 (en) | 1978-05-29 | 1984-09-28 | Glay Jean Louis | Data communications or remote canvassing, for financially guaranteed external commerce |
US4305059A (en) * | 1980-01-03 | 1981-12-08 | Benton William M | Modular funds transfer system |
JPS5875345A (en) | 1981-10-30 | 1983-05-07 | Fuji Xerox Co Ltd | Transmitting system of digital signal |
US4996662A (en) | 1983-10-03 | 1991-02-26 | Wang Laboratories, Inc. | Method for generating document using tables storing pointers and indexes |
US4567359A (en) * | 1984-05-24 | 1986-01-28 | Lockwood Lawrence B | Automatic information, goods and services dispensing system |
US5222018A (en) * | 1985-07-18 | 1993-06-22 | Pitney Bowes Inc. | System for centralized processing of accounting and payment functions |
US4713761A (en) * | 1985-07-18 | 1987-12-15 | Pitney Bowes, Inc. | System for centralized processing of accounting and payment functions |
US4725719A (en) * | 1986-07-21 | 1988-02-16 | First City National Bank Of Austin | Restricted purpose, commercial, monetary regulation method |
US5218188A (en) * | 1989-10-24 | 1993-06-08 | Norand Corporation | Compact hand-held RF data terminal |
US4799156A (en) * | 1986-10-01 | 1989-01-17 | Strategic Processing Corporation | Interactive market management system |
US4750119A (en) * | 1986-10-10 | 1988-06-07 | Tradevest, Inc. | Purchasing system with rebate feature |
US5025372A (en) * | 1987-09-17 | 1991-06-18 | Meridian Enterprises, Inc. | System and method for administration of incentive award program through use of credit |
JP2698588B2 (en) | 1987-11-13 | 1998-01-19 | 株式会社東芝 | Portable electronic devices |
US4871258A (en) | 1988-04-29 | 1989-10-03 | Boehringer Mannheim Corporation | Color test meter |
JPH0216669A (en) | 1988-07-05 | 1990-01-19 | Toshiba Corp | Security system |
US4926325A (en) * | 1988-08-23 | 1990-05-15 | Moneyfax, Inc. | Apparatus for carrying out financial transactions via a facsimile machine |
US5054096A (en) | 1988-10-24 | 1991-10-01 | Empire Blue Cross/Blue Shield | Method and apparatus for converting documents into electronic data for transaction processing |
US5161109A (en) * | 1988-12-16 | 1992-11-03 | Pitney Bowes Inc. | Up/down loading of databases |
US4949272A (en) * | 1988-12-16 | 1990-08-14 | Pitney Bowes Inc. | Flexible billing rate for mail communication systems |
US5077694A (en) * | 1988-12-16 | 1991-12-31 | Pitney Bowes Inc. | Distribution mailing system having a control database for storing mail handling categories common to the databases of selected mailer stations |
US5008827A (en) * | 1988-12-16 | 1991-04-16 | Pitney Bowes Inc. | Central postage data communication network |
US4960981A (en) * | 1989-01-17 | 1990-10-02 | Moneyfax, Inc. | Method of and system for electronic funds transfer via facsimile machines |
US4992940A (en) | 1989-03-13 | 1991-02-12 | H-Renee, Incorporated | System and method for automated selection of equipment for purchase through input of user desired specifications |
US5040132A (en) * | 1989-03-15 | 1991-08-13 | Pitney Bowes Inc. | System for preparing shipping documents |
EP0407026B1 (en) | 1989-05-25 | 1995-11-22 | Reuters Limited | Distributed system and method for matching of buyers and sellers |
US5159667A (en) | 1989-05-31 | 1992-10-27 | Borrey Roland G | Document identification by characteristics matching |
CA2025170A1 (en) | 1989-09-28 | 1991-03-29 | John W. White | Portable and dynamic distributed applications architecture |
US5043908A (en) * | 1989-10-03 | 1991-08-27 | Pitney Bowes Inc. | Mail delivery system with arrival monitoring |
ZA907106B (en) * | 1989-10-06 | 1991-09-25 | Net 1 Products Pty Ltd | Funds transfer system |
US5202981A (en) | 1989-10-23 | 1993-04-13 | International Business Machines Corporation | Process and apparatus for manipulating a boundless data stream in an object oriented programming system |
US5168444A (en) * | 1989-11-15 | 1992-12-01 | Teknekron Transportation Systems | Shipment system including processing of document images |
US5220501A (en) * | 1989-12-08 | 1993-06-15 | Online Resources, Ltd. | Method and system for remote delivery of retail banking services |
US5191525A (en) | 1990-01-16 | 1993-03-02 | Digital Image Systems, Corporation | System and method for extraction of data from documents for subsequent processing |
US5153842A (en) * | 1990-02-05 | 1992-10-06 | Pitney Bowes Inc. | Integrated circuit package label and/or manifest system |
US5117364A (en) * | 1990-03-02 | 1992-05-26 | Barns Slavin Ileana D | Carrier management method and system having auto-rate shopping |
US5151948A (en) | 1990-03-12 | 1992-09-29 | International Business Machines Corporation | System and method for processing documents having amounts recorded thereon |
US5231569A (en) * | 1990-06-12 | 1993-07-27 | Sears Payment Systems, Inc. | Account transaction system |
US5063507A (en) * | 1990-09-14 | 1991-11-05 | Plains Cotton Cooperative Association | Goods database employing electronic title or documentary-type title |
CA2059078C (en) * | 1991-02-27 | 1995-10-03 | Alexander G. Fraser | Mediation of transactions by a communications system |
US5426281A (en) * | 1991-08-22 | 1995-06-20 | Abecassis; Max | Transaction protection system |
US5208446A (en) * | 1991-09-19 | 1993-05-04 | Martinez Jerry R | Method and apparatus for validating credit information during home delivery of order |
CA2091640A1 (en) * | 1991-09-19 | 1994-09-16 | Jerry R. Martinez | Method and apparatus for validating credit information during home delivery of order |
US5712990A (en) | 1991-10-03 | 1998-01-27 | International Technology Corporation Of California | Economical automated process for averting physical dangers to people, wildlife or environment due to hazardous waste |
GB9121995D0 (en) * | 1991-10-16 | 1991-11-27 | Jonhig Ltd | Value transfer system |
WO1993007945A1 (en) * | 1991-10-21 | 1993-04-29 | Cornell Research Foundation, Inc. | Column with macroporous polymer media |
US7448063B2 (en) | 1991-11-25 | 2008-11-04 | Actv, Inc. | Digital interactive system for providing full interactivity with live programming events |
US7079176B1 (en) | 1991-11-25 | 2006-07-18 | Actv, Inc. | Digital interactive system for providing full interactivity with live programming events |
US5334823A (en) * | 1992-01-10 | 1994-08-02 | National Bancard Corporation | Systems and methods for operating data card terminals for transaction chargeback protection |
US5428210A (en) * | 1992-01-10 | 1995-06-27 | National Bancard Corporation | Data card terminal with embossed character reader and signature capture |
US5238349A (en) | 1992-03-10 | 1993-08-24 | Grace Sr Robert W | Article sorting and retrieval system |
US5393963A (en) * | 1992-03-17 | 1995-02-28 | Company Chex, Inc. | Check authorization system and process |
US5337246A (en) * | 1992-05-22 | 1994-08-09 | Pitney Bowes Inc. | Flexible apparatus and method for applying customized rating adjustments to transaction charges |
US5293310A (en) * | 1992-05-22 | 1994-03-08 | Pitney Bowes Inc. | Flexible method for applying customized rating adjustments to transaction charges |
EP0692119A1 (en) | 1992-10-22 | 1996-01-17 | American Express Travel Related Services Company, Inc. | Automated billing consolidation system and method |
US5719771A (en) | 1993-02-24 | 1998-02-17 | Amsc Subsidiary Corporation | System for mapping occurrences of conditions in a transport route |
US6323894B1 (en) * | 1993-03-12 | 2001-11-27 | Telebuyer, Llc | Commercial product routing system with video vending capability |
US5594936A (en) | 1993-04-16 | 1997-01-14 | Trans Video Electronics, Inc. | Global digital video news distribution system |
US6275813B1 (en) | 1993-04-22 | 2001-08-14 | George B. Berka | Method and device for posting financial transactions in computerized accounting systems |
AU670879B2 (en) * | 1993-05-20 | 1996-08-01 | Moore North America, Inc. | Computer integration network for channeling customer orders through a centralized computer to various suppliers |
US5794207A (en) * | 1996-09-04 | 1998-08-11 | Walker Asset Management Limited Partnership | Method and apparatus for a cryptographically assisted commercial network system designed to facilitate buyer-driven conditional purchase offers |
US5666493A (en) * | 1993-08-24 | 1997-09-09 | Lykes Bros., Inc. | System for managing customer orders and method of implementation |
US5485369A (en) | 1993-09-28 | 1996-01-16 | Tandata Corporation | Logistics system for automating tansportation of goods |
US5920847A (en) * | 1993-11-01 | 1999-07-06 | Visa International Service Association | Electronic bill pay system |
JPH07194139A (en) * | 1993-12-27 | 1995-07-28 | Hitachi Ltd | Cooling device of inverter for electric automobile |
US5500513A (en) | 1994-05-11 | 1996-03-19 | Visa International | Automated purchasing control system |
US6996542B1 (en) * | 1994-06-03 | 2006-02-07 | Midwest Payment Systems | System and method for paying bills and other obligations including selective payor and payee controls |
US5649117A (en) | 1994-06-03 | 1997-07-15 | Midwest Payment Systems | System and method for paying bills and other obligations including selective payor and payee controls |
US5809479A (en) | 1994-07-21 | 1998-09-15 | Micron Technology, Inc. | On-time delivery, tracking and reporting |
US5978567A (en) | 1994-07-27 | 1999-11-02 | Instant Video Technologies Inc. | System for distribution of interactive multimedia and linear programs by enabling program webs which include control scripts to define presentation by client transceiver |
US6023683A (en) | 1994-08-10 | 2000-02-08 | Fisher Scientific Company | Electronic sourcing system and method |
GB9416673D0 (en) * | 1994-08-17 | 1994-10-12 | Reuters Ltd | Data exchange filtering system |
US5694334A (en) | 1994-09-08 | 1997-12-02 | Starguide Digital Networks, Inc. | Method and apparatus for electronic distribution of digital multi-media information |
US5717989A (en) * | 1994-10-13 | 1998-02-10 | Full Service Trade System Ltd. | Full service trade system |
EP0787334B1 (en) | 1994-10-14 | 1998-08-05 | United Parcel Service Of America, Inc. | Multi-stage parcel tracking system |
US5754854A (en) | 1994-11-14 | 1998-05-19 | Microsoft Corporation | Method and system for providing a group of parallel resources as a proxy for a single shared resource |
US5774170A (en) | 1994-12-13 | 1998-06-30 | Hite; Kenneth C. | System and method for delivering targeted advertisements to consumers |
US5732400A (en) * | 1995-01-04 | 1998-03-24 | Citibank N.A. | System and method for a risk-based purchase of goods |
US5652749A (en) | 1995-02-03 | 1997-07-29 | International Business Machines Corporation | Apparatus and method for segmentation and time synchronization of the transmission of a multiple program multimedia data stream |
US6658568B1 (en) | 1995-02-13 | 2003-12-02 | Intertrust Technologies Corporation | Trusted infrastructure support system, methods and techniques for secure electronic commerce transaction and rights management |
US7124302B2 (en) | 1995-02-13 | 2006-10-17 | Intertrust Technologies Corp. | Systems and methods for secure transaction management and electronic rights protection |
DE69638018D1 (en) | 1995-02-13 | 2009-10-15 | Intertrust Tech Corp | Systems and procedures for managing secure transactions and protecting electronic rights |
US7165174B1 (en) | 1995-02-13 | 2007-01-16 | Intertrust Technologies Corp. | Trusted infrastructure support systems, methods and techniques for secure electronic commerce transaction and rights management |
US5892900A (en) | 1996-08-30 | 1999-04-06 | Intertrust Technologies Corp. | Systems and methods for secure transaction management and electronic rights protection |
US5930363A (en) * | 1995-03-17 | 1999-07-27 | Transmo Limited | Card charging systems |
US5671362A (en) | 1995-04-04 | 1997-09-23 | Cowe; Alan B. | Materials monitoring systems, materials management systems and related methods |
US5677955A (en) * | 1995-04-07 | 1997-10-14 | Financial Services Technology Consortium | Electronic funds transfer instruments |
US6889194B1 (en) | 1995-06-01 | 2005-05-03 | United Parcel Service Of America, Inc. | Method and system for preparing an electronic record for shipping a parcel |
US5799286A (en) | 1995-06-07 | 1998-08-25 | Electronic Data Systems Corporation | Automated activity-based management system |
US6223168B1 (en) * | 1995-07-25 | 2001-04-24 | Bottomline Technologies, Inc. | Automatic remittance delivery system |
US5893080A (en) * | 1995-07-25 | 1999-04-06 | Bottomline Technologies, Inc. | Disbursement system and method |
US7133835B1 (en) | 1995-08-08 | 2006-11-07 | Cxn, Inc. | Online exchange market system with a buyer auction and a seller auction |
US20050075964A1 (en) | 1995-08-15 | 2005-04-07 | Michael F. Quinn | Trade records information management system |
DE19539801C2 (en) | 1995-10-26 | 2001-04-19 | Ibm | Monitoring transactions with smart cards |
US5699528A (en) | 1995-10-31 | 1997-12-16 | Mastercard International, Inc. | System and method for bill delivery and payment over a communications network |
US6058380A (en) | 1995-12-08 | 2000-05-02 | Mellon Bank, N.A. | System and method for electronically processing invoice information |
JP3133243B2 (en) * | 1995-12-15 | 2001-02-05 | 株式会社エヌケーインベストメント | Online shopping system |
AU1426097A (en) | 1995-12-29 | 1997-07-28 | Tele-Communications, Inc. | Method and aparatus for processing billing transactions |
US5758328A (en) * | 1996-02-22 | 1998-05-26 | Giovannoli; Joseph | Computerized quotation system and method |
GB9604459D0 (en) | 1996-03-01 | 1996-05-01 | Isr Logistics Ltd | An apparatus for the control of inventory |
US20020049832A1 (en) | 1996-03-08 | 2002-04-25 | Craig Ullman | Enhanced video programming system and method for incorporating and displaying retrieved integrated internet information segments |
US5845283A (en) | 1996-04-24 | 1998-12-01 | Lingua Teq, Inc. | Method and apparatus for rationalizing different data formats in a data management system |
US5778187A (en) | 1996-05-09 | 1998-07-07 | Netcast Communications Corp. | Multicasting method and apparatus |
US5924083A (en) | 1996-05-29 | 1999-07-13 | Geneva Branch Of Reuters Transaction Services Limited | Distributed matching system for displaying a book of credit filtered bids and offers |
US6026374A (en) * | 1996-05-30 | 2000-02-15 | International Business Machines Corporation | System and method for generating trusted descriptions of information products |
US5870719A (en) | 1996-07-03 | 1999-02-09 | Sun Microsystems, Inc. | Platform-independent, usage-independent, and access-independent distributed quote configuraton system |
US6266640B1 (en) * | 1996-08-06 | 2001-07-24 | Dialogic Corporation | Data network with voice verification means |
US5918216A (en) | 1996-08-22 | 1999-06-29 | Microsoft Corporation | Automatic recognition of periods for financial transactions |
JPH1075005A (en) * | 1996-08-30 | 1998-03-17 | Ando Electric Co Ltd | Light source device for optical frequency multiplex transmission |
US5931917A (en) | 1996-09-26 | 1999-08-03 | Verifone, Inc. | System, method and article of manufacture for a gateway system architecture with system administration information accessible from a browser |
US5806063A (en) * | 1996-10-03 | 1998-09-08 | Mcdonnell Douglas Corporation | Date formatting and sorting for dates spanning the turn of the century |
US6029150A (en) * | 1996-10-04 | 2000-02-22 | Certco, Llc | Payment and transactions in electronic commerce system |
US5960407A (en) * | 1996-10-08 | 1999-09-28 | Vivona; Robert G. | Automated market price analysis system |
US5995976A (en) * | 1996-10-11 | 1999-11-30 | Walker Asset Management Limited Partnership | Method and apparatus for distributing supplemental information related to printed articles |
US5917830A (en) | 1996-10-18 | 1999-06-29 | General Instrument Corporation | Splicing compressed packetized digital video streams |
US6070150A (en) * | 1996-10-18 | 2000-05-30 | Microsoft Corporation | Electronic bill presentment and payment system |
US6317737B1 (en) | 1996-10-18 | 2001-11-13 | Sagent Technologies, Inc. | Data descriptions in a database system |
US5790790A (en) | 1996-10-24 | 1998-08-04 | Tumbleweed Software Corporation | Electronic document delivery system in which notification of said electronic document is sent to a recipient thereof |
US20070055582A1 (en) | 1996-11-12 | 2007-03-08 | Hahn-Carlson Dean W | Transaction processing with core and distributor processor implementations |
US7627499B2 (en) | 1996-11-12 | 2009-12-01 | Syncada Llc | Automated transaction processing system and approach |
US20050165699A1 (en) | 1996-11-12 | 2005-07-28 | Hahn-Carlson Dean W. | Processing and management of transaction timing characteristics |
JPH10143732A (en) | 1996-11-12 | 1998-05-29 | Kuresutetsuku Internatl Corp:Kk | Automatic vending machine and distribution management system |
US7110959B2 (en) | 1996-11-12 | 2006-09-19 | Hahn-Carlson Dean W | Processing and management of transaction timing characteristics |
US6697702B1 (en) * | 1999-03-12 | 2004-02-24 | U.S. Bancorp | Shipment transaction system and an arrangement thereof |
US5910896A (en) * | 1996-11-12 | 1999-06-08 | Hahn-Carlson; Dean W. | Shipment transaction system and an arrangement thereof |
US20080172314A1 (en) | 1996-11-12 | 2008-07-17 | Hahn-Carlson Dean W | Financial institution-based transaction processing system and approach |
US8392285B2 (en) * | 1996-11-12 | 2013-03-05 | Syncada Llc | Multi-supplier transaction and payment programmed processing approach with at least one supplier |
US20040010463A1 (en) * | 1996-11-12 | 2004-01-15 | Hahn-Carlson Dean W. | Automated transaction processing system and approach |
US6607081B2 (en) | 1996-11-15 | 2003-08-19 | Diebold, Incorporated | Automated transaction machine system |
US6148377A (en) | 1996-11-22 | 2000-11-14 | Mangosoft Corporation | Shared memory computer networks |
US5987506A (en) | 1996-11-22 | 1999-11-16 | Mangosoft Corporation | Remote access and geographically distributed computers in a globally addressable storage environment |
US5897645A (en) | 1996-11-22 | 1999-04-27 | Electronic Data Systems Corporation | Method and system for composing electronic data interchange information |
JP2001508883A (en) * | 1996-12-20 | 2001-07-03 | ファイナンシャル サーヴィシーズ テクノロジー コンソーティアム | Method and system for processing electronic documents |
US6490567B1 (en) | 1997-01-15 | 2002-12-03 | At&T Corp. | System and method for distributed content electronic commerce |
US6167378A (en) * | 1997-01-21 | 2000-12-26 | Webber, Jr.; Donald Gary | Automated back office transaction method and system |
US6684384B1 (en) | 1997-03-28 | 2004-01-27 | International Business Machines Corporation | Extensible object oriented framework for general ledger |
AU6947198A (en) | 1997-04-02 | 1998-10-22 | Citibank, N.A. | Method and system for standardizing and reconciling invoices from vendors |
US5991728A (en) | 1997-04-30 | 1999-11-23 | Deroyal Industries, Inc. | Method and system for the tracking and profiling of supply usage in a health care environment |
US6097834A (en) | 1997-06-13 | 2000-08-01 | Paystation America Inc. | Financial transaction processing systems and methods |
US5949044A (en) * | 1997-06-13 | 1999-09-07 | Walker Asset Management Limited Partnership | Method and apparatus for funds and credit line transfers |
US5973685A (en) | 1997-07-07 | 1999-10-26 | International Business Machines Corporation | Scheme for the distribution of multimedia follow-up information |
US6826544B1 (en) | 1997-07-09 | 2004-11-30 | Advanceme, Inc. | Automated loan repayment |
US6199046B1 (en) | 1997-07-29 | 2001-03-06 | Adsura Pty Ltd. | Method system and article of manufacture for performing real time currency conversion |
US5899980A (en) | 1997-08-11 | 1999-05-04 | Trivnet Ltd. | Retail method over a wide area network |
US5956690A (en) | 1997-09-03 | 1999-09-21 | The Detroit Medical Center | Bundled billing accounting computer systems |
US6044362A (en) * | 1997-09-08 | 2000-03-28 | Neely; R. Alan | Electronic invoicing and payment system |
CA2303513A1 (en) | 1997-09-15 | 1999-03-25 | Maintenet Corporation | Electronic information network for inventory control and transfer |
US6832212B1 (en) | 1997-09-30 | 2004-12-14 | Ncr Corporation | Method and apparatus for manipulating billing and payment information within a browser interface system |
US5970475A (en) | 1997-10-10 | 1999-10-19 | Intelisys Electronic Commerce, Llc | Electronic procurement system and method for trading partners |
US6055519A (en) * | 1997-10-11 | 2000-04-25 | I2 Technologies, Inc. | Framework for negotiation and tracking of sale of goods |
US6128602A (en) | 1997-10-27 | 2000-10-03 | Bank Of America Corporation | Open-architecture system for real-time consolidation of information from multiple financial systems |
US6442533B1 (en) | 1997-10-29 | 2002-08-27 | William H. Hinkle | Multi-processing financial transaction processing system |
US6047268A (en) * | 1997-11-04 | 2000-04-04 | A.T.&T. Corporation | Method and apparatus for billing for transactions conducted over the internet |
US6131087A (en) * | 1997-11-05 | 2000-10-10 | The Planning Solutions Group, Inc. | Method for automatically identifying, matching, and near-matching buyers and sellers in electronic market transactions |
US6157924A (en) | 1997-11-07 | 2000-12-05 | Bell & Howell Mail Processing Systems Company | Systems, methods, and computer program products for delivering information in a preferred medium |
US5943670A (en) | 1997-11-21 | 1999-08-24 | International Business Machines Corporation | System and method for categorizing objects in combined categories |
US20050027613A1 (en) | 1997-12-08 | 2005-02-03 | Nippon Steel Corporation | Goods dealing apparatus, goods, dealing system, goods dealing method, and storage medium |
US6016477A (en) | 1997-12-18 | 2000-01-18 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method and apparatus for identifying applicable business rules |
US6085200A (en) | 1997-12-23 | 2000-07-04 | Unisys Corporation | System and method for arranging database restoration data for efficient data recovery in transaction processing systems |
JP4025450B2 (en) | 1998-03-06 | 2007-12-19 | 三谷産業株式会社 | Approval processing apparatus and recording medium recording approval processing program |
US6154738A (en) | 1998-03-27 | 2000-11-28 | Call; Charles Gainor | Methods and apparatus for disseminating product information via the internet using universal product codes |
US6721715B2 (en) | 1998-03-30 | 2004-04-13 | Martin A. Nemzow | Method and apparatus for localizing currency valuation independent of the original and objective currencies |
US6741968B2 (en) | 1998-04-24 | 2004-05-25 | Fuel Partners, L.P. | Method for processing information through a clearinghouse |
US6879962B1 (en) | 1998-05-24 | 2005-04-12 | Joseph D. Smith | Logistics system and method |
US6035288A (en) | 1998-06-29 | 2000-03-07 | Cendant Publishing, Inc. | Interactive computer-implemented system and method for negotiating sale of goods and/or services |
JP2000048264A (en) | 1998-07-27 | 2000-02-18 | Fujitsu Ltd | Journal sheets of paper management method, transaction processor and transaction recording journal sheets of paper |
US6499036B1 (en) | 1998-08-12 | 2002-12-24 | Bank Of America Corporation | Method and apparatus for data item movement between disparate sources and hierarchical, object-oriented representation |
US6324551B1 (en) | 1998-08-31 | 2001-11-27 | Xerox Corporation | Self-contained document management based on document properties |
US6833865B1 (en) | 1998-09-01 | 2004-12-21 | Virage, Inc. | Embedded metadata engines in digital capture devices |
US7248855B2 (en) | 1998-09-15 | 2007-07-24 | Upaid Systems, Ltd. | Convergent communications system and method with a rule set for authorizing, debiting, settling and recharging a mobile commerce account |
US6357042B2 (en) | 1998-09-16 | 2002-03-12 | Anand Srinivasan | Method and apparatus for multiplexing separately-authored metadata for insertion into a video data stream |
MXPA01002774A (en) | 1998-09-18 | 2002-08-12 | I2 Technologies Inc | System and method for displaying logistics information associated with a supply chain. |
CA2345241A1 (en) | 1998-09-22 | 2000-03-30 | Science Applications International Corporation | User-defined dynamic collaborative environments |
US6973258B1 (en) | 1998-10-02 | 2005-12-06 | Lg Electronics Inc. | Method and apparatus for recording digital data streams |
US6366829B1 (en) | 1998-10-06 | 2002-04-02 | J. P. Donmoyer, Inc. | Bulk inventory network system (BINS) |
US7131069B1 (en) | 1998-10-22 | 2006-10-31 | Made2 Manage Systems, Inc. | Navigational interface for ERP system |
US20010014878A1 (en) * | 1998-11-09 | 2001-08-16 | Nilotpal Mitra | Transaction method and apparatus |
US6254000B1 (en) | 1998-11-13 | 2001-07-03 | First Data Corporation | System and method for providing a card transaction authorization fraud warning |
US6141653A (en) | 1998-11-16 | 2000-10-31 | Tradeaccess Inc | System for interative, multivariate negotiations over a network |
US7162458B1 (en) | 1998-11-16 | 2007-01-09 | Sky Technologies, Llc | System and method for process mining |
JP4226171B2 (en) | 1998-11-17 | 2009-02-18 | 富士通株式会社 | Accounting system for processing transaction data, method thereof, and storage medium storing program therefor |
US6260024B1 (en) | 1998-12-02 | 2001-07-10 | Gary Shkedy | Method and apparatus for facilitating buyer-driven purchase orders on a commercial network system |
US6169542B1 (en) | 1998-12-14 | 2001-01-02 | Gte Main Street Incorporated | Method of delivering advertising through an interactive video distribution system |
US6330550B1 (en) | 1998-12-30 | 2001-12-11 | Nortel Networks Limited | Cross-media notifications for e-commerce |
US20040095237A1 (en) | 1999-01-09 | 2004-05-20 | Chen Kimball C. | Electronic message delivery system utilizable in the monitoring and control of remote equipment and method of same |
US6598026B1 (en) | 1999-01-25 | 2003-07-22 | Nextag.Com, Inc. | Methods and apparatus for brokering transactions |
US6507826B1 (en) | 1999-01-29 | 2003-01-14 | Koriel, Inc. | Remote electronic invoice entry and validation system and method therefor |
US6539360B1 (en) | 1999-02-05 | 2003-03-25 | United Parcel Service Of America, Inc. | Special handling processing in a package transportation system |
US6493685B1 (en) | 1999-02-10 | 2002-12-10 | The Chase Manhattan Bank | Electronic account presentation and response system and method |
US6246994B1 (en) | 1999-02-19 | 2001-06-12 | Therightsize, Inc. | System and method for providing standardized individual information |
US7590575B2 (en) | 1999-03-08 | 2009-09-15 | Microsoft Corporation | Method and apparatus for converting, formatting, and displaying currency values |
US6477510B1 (en) | 1999-03-15 | 2002-11-05 | Andrew Johnson, Inc. | Euro booking currency conversion method |
US6338044B1 (en) | 1999-03-17 | 2002-01-08 | Loudeye Technologies, Inc. | Personal digital content system |
US6204763B1 (en) | 1999-03-22 | 2001-03-20 | Jujitsu Limited | Household consumable item automatic replenishment system including intelligent refrigerator |
US6944595B1 (en) | 1999-03-25 | 2005-09-13 | International Business Machines Corporation | Apparatus and method for performing conversion between different units of currency using an encapsulated conversion path of exchange rates |
WO2000062225A1 (en) | 1999-04-08 | 2000-10-19 | Kay Alan F | Marketplace system fees enhancing market share and participation |
WO2000062259A1 (en) | 1999-04-13 | 2000-10-19 | Orbis Patents Limited | Person-to-person, person-to-business, business-to-person, and business-to-business financial transaction system |
US6789252B1 (en) | 1999-04-15 | 2004-09-07 | Miles D. Burke | Building business objects and business software applications using dynamic object definitions of ingrediential objects |
US6526443B1 (en) * | 1999-05-12 | 2003-02-25 | Sandia Corporation | Method and apparatus for managing transactions with connected computers |
US6721713B1 (en) | 1999-05-27 | 2004-04-13 | Andersen Consulting Llp | Business alliance identification in a web architecture framework |
US7606760B2 (en) | 1999-06-18 | 2009-10-20 | Echarge Corporation | Method and apparatus for ordering goods, services and content over an internetwork using a virtual payment account |
AU6229000A (en) * | 1999-07-26 | 2001-02-13 | Iprivacy Llc | Electronic purchase of goods over a communication network including physical delivery while securing private and personal information |
US7340433B1 (en) | 1999-07-30 | 2008-03-04 | Orbian Management Limited | System and method of transaction settlement using trade credit |
AU5840900A (en) | 1999-07-30 | 2001-02-19 | Orbian Management Limited | System and method of transaction settlement using trade credit |
US6873997B1 (en) | 1999-08-04 | 2005-03-29 | Agile Software Corporation | Data management system and method for automatically propagating information to disparate information systems from a central location |
US7120871B1 (en) | 1999-09-15 | 2006-10-10 | Actv, Inc. | Enhanced video programming system and method utilizing a web page staging area |
US7634455B1 (en) | 1999-09-23 | 2009-12-15 | Agile Software Corporation | Method and apparatus for providing controlled access to software objects and associated documents |
JP2003521763A (en) | 1999-09-24 | 2003-07-15 | メアリー マッケンニー | System and method for providing settlement service in electronic commerce |
US7742967B1 (en) | 1999-10-01 | 2010-06-22 | Cardinalcommerce Corporation | Secure and efficient payment processing system |
US7047219B1 (en) * | 1999-10-04 | 2006-05-16 | Trade Finance Systems, Inc. | Trade finance automation system |
US7117170B1 (en) | 1999-10-06 | 2006-10-03 | Stamps.Com Inc. | Apparatus, systems and methods for applying billing options for multiple carriers for online, multi-carrier, multi-service parcel shipping management |
WO2001035570A1 (en) * | 1999-11-05 | 2001-05-17 | Netcharge.Com, Inc. | Payment method and system for online commerce |
US6873963B1 (en) | 1999-11-30 | 2005-03-29 | Daimlerchrysler Corporation | Shipment tracking analysis and reporting system (STARS) |
US20010032154A1 (en) | 1999-12-17 | 2001-10-18 | Eric Schummer | Internet communications and e-commerce platform |
US6629081B1 (en) | 1999-12-22 | 2003-09-30 | Accenture Llp | Account settlement and financing in an e-commerce environment |
US7069234B1 (en) | 1999-12-22 | 2006-06-27 | Accenture Llp | Initiating an agreement in an e-commerce environment |
US7047210B1 (en) | 1999-12-23 | 2006-05-16 | Qwest Communications International Inc. | Method and system for auctioning a product on a computer network |
US7318047B1 (en) * | 1999-12-29 | 2008-01-08 | Pitney Bowes Inc. | Method and apparatus for providing electronic refunds in an online payment system |
US7177836B1 (en) | 1999-12-30 | 2007-02-13 | First Data Corporation | Method and system for facilitating financial transactions between consumers over the internet |
WO2001052122A2 (en) | 2000-01-10 | 2001-07-19 | Skulogix Inc. | Method and system for facilitating fulfillment of electronic commercial transactions |
US20010049657A1 (en) * | 2000-01-11 | 2001-12-06 | Wang Erh-Chiao C. | Method, apparatus and system of merchandise hierarchical online ordering, billing and distribution |
US20060206412A1 (en) | 2000-01-14 | 2006-09-14 | Van Luchene Andrew S | Systems and methods for facilitating a transaction by matching seller information and buyer information |
US6505169B1 (en) | 2000-01-26 | 2003-01-07 | At&T Corp. | Method for adaptive ad insertion in streaming multimedia content |
US6829590B1 (en) | 2000-01-31 | 2004-12-07 | Goldman, Sachs & Co. | Enhanced online sales risk management system |
CA2310589A1 (en) | 2000-02-06 | 2001-12-02 | Jason Frank Saxon | System and method for ordering products or services |
US20020062278A1 (en) | 2000-02-18 | 2002-05-23 | Ingram Bradley Kent | Method and system for international e-commerce |
US20050278244A1 (en) | 2000-02-22 | 2005-12-15 | Yuan Frank S | Auction with methods and mechanisms to avoid fraud |
US20020038277A1 (en) | 2000-02-22 | 2002-03-28 | Yuan Frank S. | Innovative financing method and system therefor |
AU2656500A (en) | 2000-02-29 | 2001-09-12 | Swisscom Mobile Ag | Transaction confirmation method, authentication server and wap server |
US6687713B2 (en) | 2000-02-29 | 2004-02-03 | Groupthink Unlimited, Inc. | Budget information, analysis, and projection system and method |
US6510383B1 (en) | 2000-03-01 | 2003-01-21 | Arrivalstar, Inc. | Vehicular route optimization system and method |
US7865414B2 (en) | 2000-03-01 | 2011-01-04 | Passgate Corporation | Method, system and computer readable medium for web site account and e-commerce management from a central location |
GB2375863A (en) | 2000-03-06 | 2002-11-27 | Wellogix Inc | Method and process for providing relevant data comparing proposal alternatives and reconciling proposals invoices and purchase orders with actual costs in a w |
US20020007302A1 (en) * | 2000-03-06 | 2002-01-17 | Work Bruce V. | Method and apparatus for tracking vendor compliance with purchaser guidelines and related method for the commercial distribution of software and hardware implementing same |
US20010032171A1 (en) | 2000-03-07 | 2001-10-18 | Brink Jerry Ten | System and method for trading commodities |
US6999943B1 (en) | 2000-03-10 | 2006-02-14 | Doublecredit.Com, Inc. | Routing methods and systems for increasing payment transaction volume and profitability |
GB2360373A (en) | 2000-03-15 | 2001-09-19 | Nadeem Ahmed | Computer apparatus for monitoring and updating accountancy records |
AUPQ628900A0 (en) | 2000-03-16 | 2000-04-15 | Ip3 Systems Pty Ltd | E-commerce facilitation |
GB2377059A (en) | 2000-03-17 | 2002-12-31 | Ebay Inc | Method and apparatus for facilitating online payment transactions in a network based transaction facility using multiple payment instruments |
US7499875B1 (en) | 2000-03-17 | 2009-03-03 | Ebay Inc. | Method and apparatus for facilitating online payment transactions in a network-based transaction facility using multiple payment instruments |
US20020046125A1 (en) * | 2000-03-24 | 2002-04-18 | Charles Speicher | Systems and methods for correcting supply/demand imbalances in multi-tier exchanges |
US7437310B1 (en) | 2000-03-27 | 2008-10-14 | International Business Machines Corporation | Third party contract depository for E-commerce transactions |
CA2342573C (en) | 2000-04-03 | 2015-05-12 | Ensera, Inc. | System and method of administering, tracking and managing of claims processing |
US7263506B2 (en) | 2000-04-06 | 2007-08-28 | Fair Isaac Corporation | Identification and management of fraudulent credit/debit card purchases at merchant ecommerce sites |
US6983278B1 (en) | 2001-04-10 | 2006-01-03 | Arena Solutions, Inc. | System and method for access control and for supply chain management via a shared bill of material |
US7558793B1 (en) | 2000-04-10 | 2009-07-07 | Arena Solutions, Inc. | System and method for managing data in multiple bills of material over a network |
US20010047311A1 (en) | 2000-04-13 | 2001-11-29 | Bhavesh Singh | Method for communicating, collaborating and transacting commerce via a communication network |
US20020032649A1 (en) | 2000-04-13 | 2002-03-14 | Balamurugan Selvarajan | High-security E-currency IDs for E-commerce transactions |
EP1285375A4 (en) | 2000-04-26 | 2003-06-25 | Oracle Corp | Many-to-many correspondance: methods and systems for replacing interbank funds transfers |
AU2001259192A1 (en) | 2000-04-27 | 2001-11-07 | Eastman Chemical Company | Vertical systems and methods for providing shipping and logistics services, operations and products to an industry |
EP1150227A1 (en) | 2000-04-28 | 2001-10-31 | Lucent Technologies Inc. | Anonymous and secure electronic commerce |
US20020026374A1 (en) | 2000-05-02 | 2002-02-28 | Moneymaker Vincent B. | Comprehensive third-party transactional processing and payment in an online environment |
US7188080B1 (en) | 2000-05-12 | 2007-03-06 | Walker Digital, Llc | Systems and methods wherin a buyer purchases products in a plurality of product categories |
US7698240B1 (en) | 2000-05-15 | 2010-04-13 | I2 Technologies Us, Inc. | System and method for providing electronic financial transaction services |
CA2409918A1 (en) | 2000-05-19 | 2001-11-29 | Manugistics Atlanta, Inc. | Dynamic pricing system |
US20020065736A1 (en) | 2000-05-23 | 2002-05-30 | David Willner | Electronic procurement system |
US7565326B2 (en) | 2000-05-25 | 2009-07-21 | Randle William M | Dialect independent multi-dimensional integrator using a normalized language platform and secure controlled access |
US20040039696A1 (en) | 2002-06-25 | 2004-02-26 | Richard Harmon | System and method for executing a payment transaction over a computer network |
WO2001095225A1 (en) * | 2000-06-08 | 2001-12-13 | Goldman, Sachs & Co. | Method and system for automated transaction compliance processing |
US20010056395A1 (en) | 2000-06-09 | 2001-12-27 | Khan Saadat H. | Internet bargaining system |
US6850900B1 (en) | 2000-06-19 | 2005-02-01 | Gary W. Hare | Full service secure commercial electronic marketplace |
US10185936B2 (en) | 2000-06-22 | 2019-01-22 | Jpmorgan Chase Bank, N.A. | Method and system for processing internet payments |
US20050119980A1 (en) | 2000-06-29 | 2005-06-02 | Neat Group Corporation | Electronic negotiation systems |
US20020055850A1 (en) | 2000-07-06 | 2002-05-09 | Powell A. Leigh | Commerce exchange system |
WO2002005231A2 (en) | 2000-07-11 | 2002-01-17 | Paypal, Inc. | System and method for third-party payment processing |
US20030037100A1 (en) | 2000-07-17 | 2003-02-20 | Modelwire, Inc. | Streamlined data distribution system for commercial applications |
US6751630B1 (en) | 2000-07-20 | 2004-06-15 | Ge Medical Technology Services, Inc. | Integrated multiple biomedical information sources |
US7146337B1 (en) | 2000-09-13 | 2006-12-05 | Precept Corporation | System and method for originating loans |
AU2001282995A1 (en) | 2000-07-28 | 2002-02-13 | Union Carbide Chemicals And Plastics Technology Corporation | Transport logistics systems and methods |
US7130822B1 (en) | 2000-07-31 | 2006-10-31 | Cognos Incorporated | Budget planning |
NO312427B1 (en) | 2000-08-04 | 2002-05-06 | Usertrade As | Electronic trading system |
US6883004B2 (en) | 2000-08-04 | 2005-04-19 | Bottomline Technologies (De), Inc. | Automated invoice receipt and management system |
US6882986B1 (en) | 2000-08-07 | 2005-04-19 | Tymetrix | Method for automatic processing of invoices |
WO2002015098A2 (en) * | 2000-08-11 | 2002-02-21 | Loy John J | Trade receivable processing method and apparatus |
US7206768B1 (en) | 2000-08-14 | 2007-04-17 | Jpmorgan Chase Bank, N.A. | Electronic multiparty accounts receivable and accounts payable system |
US8131627B2 (en) | 2000-08-17 | 2012-03-06 | Mamoud Sadre | Open clearing system |
US7099304B2 (en) | 2000-09-05 | 2006-08-29 | Flexiworld Technologies, Inc. | Apparatus, methods and systems for anonymous communication |
US7617146B2 (en) | 2000-09-05 | 2009-11-10 | Primerevenue, Inc. | Factoring system and method |
US6895438B1 (en) | 2000-09-06 | 2005-05-17 | Paul C. Ulrich | Telecommunication-based time-management system and method |
US20020029194A1 (en) | 2000-09-07 | 2002-03-07 | Richard Lewis | System and method of managing financial transactions over an electronic network |
US20020040304A1 (en) * | 2000-10-02 | 2002-04-04 | Subrao Shenoy | Methods and systems for creating and managing capital asset business exchanges |
US7222081B1 (en) | 2000-10-05 | 2007-05-22 | Fujitsu Limited | System and method for continuous delivery schedule including automated customer notification |
AU2001296636A1 (en) * | 2000-10-06 | 2002-04-15 | Optiant, Inc. | System and method for determining the optimum configuration strategy for systemswith multiple decision options |
CA2322599A1 (en) | 2000-10-06 | 2002-04-06 | Ibm Canada Limited-Ibm Canada Limitee | System and method for workflow control of contractual activities |
CA2322602A1 (en) | 2000-10-06 | 2002-04-06 | Ibm Canada Limited-Ibm Canada Limitee | System and method for generating a contract and conducting contractual activities under the contract |
US6820038B1 (en) | 2001-09-04 | 2004-11-16 | Accenture Global Services Gmbh | Component provisioning or issuance in a maintenance, repair or overhaul environment |
US6785718B2 (en) | 2000-10-23 | 2004-08-31 | Schneider Logistics, Inc. | Method and system for interfacing with a shipping service |
US8577794B2 (en) * | 2000-10-24 | 2013-11-05 | Bank Of America Corporation | System and method for collecting information to facilitate enrollment in an electronic funds transfer program |
CA2324729A1 (en) | 2000-10-30 | 2002-04-30 | Ibm Canada Limited-Ibm Canada Limitee | System and method for representation of business policy and governing the conduct of business activities using business rules book |
US7587363B2 (en) | 2000-11-06 | 2009-09-08 | Jpmorgan Chase Bank, N.A. | System and method for optimized funding of electronic transactions |
JP3982168B2 (en) | 2000-11-13 | 2007-09-26 | コクヨ株式会社 | Purchasing management system, purchasing management method, and purchasing management program |
US20020059134A1 (en) | 2000-11-15 | 2002-05-16 | Sun Microsystems, Inc. | Flexible and extensible e-commerce architecture |
JP2002154612A (en) | 2000-11-15 | 2002-05-28 | Internatl Business Mach Corp <Ibm> | Path searching system and path searching method |
US7266524B1 (en) | 2000-11-28 | 2007-09-04 | Goldman Sachs & Co. | Method, software program, and system for isolating risk in a financial transaction |
US6839692B2 (en) | 2000-12-01 | 2005-01-04 | Benedor Corporation | Method and apparatus to provide secure purchase transactions over a computer network |
US20020107761A1 (en) | 2000-12-10 | 2002-08-08 | Donald Kark | Methods and systems for improved channel sales support in electronic commerce |
US7475024B1 (en) | 2000-12-13 | 2009-01-06 | Microsoft Corporation | System and method for distributing in real-time, inventory data acquired from in-store point of sale terminals |
US6792459B2 (en) | 2000-12-14 | 2004-09-14 | International Business Machines Corporation | Verification of service level agreement contracts in a client server environment |
JP2002203135A (en) | 2000-12-28 | 2002-07-19 | Tokai Bank Ltd | Electronic commerce system |
US6937992B1 (en) | 2000-12-29 | 2005-08-30 | Arrowstream, Inc. | Transport vehicle capacity maximization logistics system and method of same |
US8311911B2 (en) * | 2000-12-30 | 2012-11-13 | E*Trade Financial Corporation | Global foreign exchange system |
US20020095355A1 (en) | 2001-01-18 | 2002-07-18 | Doreen A. Labit | Computer-implemented international trade system |
US8326754B2 (en) | 2001-02-05 | 2012-12-04 | Oracle International Corporation | Method and system for processing transactions |
US6882983B2 (en) * | 2001-02-05 | 2005-04-19 | Notiva Corporation | Method and system for processing transactions |
US20020111886A1 (en) | 2001-02-12 | 2002-08-15 | Chenevich William L. | Payment management |
US7509288B2 (en) | 2001-02-22 | 2009-03-24 | International Business Machines Corporation | Invoice processing system |
GB2372616A (en) * | 2001-02-23 | 2002-08-28 | Hewlett Packard Co | Transaction method and apparatus using two part tokens |
US20020184101A1 (en) * | 2001-03-02 | 2002-12-05 | Gidadhubli Rajiv Raghavendrarao | Method and apparatus for integrating with multiple application systems |
US7136467B2 (en) | 2001-03-02 | 2006-11-14 | Symphony Service Corp | Customer-oriented telecommunications data aggregation and analysis method and object oriented system |
US6673479B2 (en) | 2001-03-15 | 2004-01-06 | Hydrogenics Corporation | System and method for enabling the real time buying and selling of electricity generated by fuel cell powered vehicles |
US20020147655A1 (en) | 2001-03-19 | 2002-10-10 | Say Mustafa Erhan | Method of exchanging goods by an auction |
US20030074206A1 (en) | 2001-03-23 | 2003-04-17 | Restaurant Services, Inc. | System, method and computer program product for utilizing market demand information for generating revenue |
US20030046089A1 (en) | 2001-03-23 | 2003-03-06 | Restaurant Services, Inc. | System, method and computer program product for an access-based revenue model involving a supply chain management framework |
US7181017B1 (en) | 2001-03-23 | 2007-02-20 | David Felsher | System and method for secure three-party communications |
US20020143858A1 (en) | 2001-03-29 | 2002-10-03 | William Teague | Report scheduler |
US20020198829A1 (en) | 2001-04-03 | 2002-12-26 | Bottomline Technologies, Inc. | Modular business transactions platform |
US20020156797A1 (en) | 2001-04-04 | 2002-10-24 | Alorica Inc. | Method, system, and program for customer service and support management |
US7464092B2 (en) | 2001-04-04 | 2008-12-09 | Alorica, Inc | Method, system and program for customer service and support management |
US6963885B2 (en) | 2001-04-11 | 2005-11-08 | International Business Machines Corporation | System and method for identifying invoices that may be duplicate prior to payment |
JP2004531813A (en) | 2001-04-23 | 2004-10-14 | オラクル・インターナショナル・コーポレイション | Method and system for performing collateral dependent payments via secure electronic bank draft supported by online letters of credit and / or online performance guarantees |
US20020161719A1 (en) * | 2001-04-27 | 2002-10-31 | Manning David Franklin | Method of and apparatus for on-line enrolment |
GB2400962B (en) | 2001-05-02 | 2004-12-29 | Virtual Access Ltd | Secure payment method and system |
US20020198833A1 (en) | 2001-05-03 | 2002-12-26 | Jacob Wohlstadter | Method and system of exchanging and deriving economic benefit from exchanging securities |
GB0110893D0 (en) | 2001-05-03 | 2001-06-27 | Gems Dev Organisation The Ltd | Transaction management systems |
US20020174034A1 (en) | 2001-05-17 | 2002-11-21 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method and apparatus for a distributed web commerce system |
US7730528B2 (en) | 2001-06-01 | 2010-06-01 | Symantec Corporation | Intelligent secure data manipulation apparatus and method |
GB0113493D0 (en) | 2001-06-04 | 2001-07-25 | Boswell Anthony | Parking aid |
US7702563B2 (en) | 2001-06-11 | 2010-04-20 | Otc Online Partners | Integrated electronic exchange of structured contracts with dynamic risk-based transaction permissioning |
US20030014325A1 (en) | 2001-06-27 | 2003-01-16 | Peter Biffar | Automatic pricing and negotiation system |
US20030004823A1 (en) * | 2001-06-28 | 2003-01-02 | Epylon Corporation | Integrated procurement system facilitating the sharing of research and purchasing across multiple buying organizations |
US20030126047A1 (en) * | 2001-06-29 | 2003-07-03 | Terri Hollar | Accounting engine for a lease transaction management and accounting system |
US20030139985A1 (en) | 2001-06-29 | 2003-07-24 | Terri Hollar | Lease transaction management and accounting system |
US20030074298A1 (en) | 2001-07-09 | 2003-04-17 | Wolfgang Daum | Information product market system and method |
US20030018563A1 (en) * | 2001-07-13 | 2003-01-23 | Efficient Capital Corporation | Trading and processing of commercial accounts receivable |
US20030158811A1 (en) * | 2001-07-18 | 2003-08-21 | Ventanex | System and method for rules based electronic funds transaction processing |
US7203662B2 (en) | 2001-07-25 | 2007-04-10 | International Business Machines Corporation | Apparatus, system and method for automatically making operational selling decisions |
JP2003044778A (en) | 2001-07-30 | 2003-02-14 | Fujitsu Ltd | Specification notice method, specification notice program, specification displaying method |
US20030041008A1 (en) | 2001-08-22 | 2003-02-27 | William Grey | System and method for facilitating transactions among disparate entities |
US7574363B2 (en) | 2001-08-23 | 2009-08-11 | International Business Machines Corporation | Intelligent merchandise indicator |
US20030055779A1 (en) * | 2001-09-06 | 2003-03-20 | Larry Wolf | Apparatus and method of collaborative funding of new products and/or services |
EP1293944A1 (en) * | 2001-09-17 | 2003-03-19 | Koninklijke KPN N.V. | Arrangement and method for tele-commerce with client profiles |
US7149744B1 (en) | 2001-09-27 | 2006-12-12 | I2 Technologies Us, Inc. | Third party document storage and reuse |
US7054841B1 (en) | 2001-09-27 | 2006-05-30 | I2 Technologies Us, Inc. | Document storage and classification |
US7958049B2 (en) | 2001-11-01 | 2011-06-07 | Metavante Corporation | System and method for obtaining customer bill information and facilitating bill payment at biller websites |
US7536362B2 (en) | 2001-11-07 | 2009-05-19 | Ariba, Inc. | Method for selecting an optimal balance between direct cost and a number of suppliers |
US20050256802A1 (en) | 2001-11-14 | 2005-11-17 | Dirk Ammermann | Payment protocol and data transmission method and data transmission device for conducting payment transactions |
US20050177435A1 (en) | 2001-11-28 | 2005-08-11 | Derek Lidow | Supply chain network |
US6988111B2 (en) | 2001-11-29 | 2006-01-17 | I2 Technologies Us, Inc. | Mapping between part numbers that are based on different part numbering schemes |
US20030233321A1 (en) | 2001-11-30 | 2003-12-18 | Scolini Anthony J. | Integrated invoice solution |
US7415471B1 (en) | 2001-11-30 | 2008-08-19 | Midland Loan Services, Inc. | Methods and systems for automated data collection and analysis for use in association with asset securitization |
US20030117446A1 (en) | 2001-12-21 | 2003-06-26 | Expeditors International Of Washington Inc. | System and method for processing transaction information |
US7346575B1 (en) | 2002-01-07 | 2008-03-18 | First Data Corporation | Systems and methods for selectively delaying financial transactions |
US20030135425A1 (en) * | 2002-01-11 | 2003-07-17 | Leavitt Harold O. | Method and apparatus for a cryptographically assisted commercial system designed to facilitate seller driven sales offers |
US20030135435A1 (en) * | 2002-01-15 | 2003-07-17 | Amos Aharoni | E-DRAFT collection |
US20030144901A1 (en) | 2002-01-25 | 2003-07-31 | Coulter Jeffery R. | Managing supplier and alliance partner performance data |
US20030149674A1 (en) | 2002-02-01 | 2003-08-07 | Pakhound, Inc. | Shipment monitoring method and system |
US7398248B2 (en) | 2002-02-08 | 2008-07-08 | Catalina Marketing Corporation | System and method for using cards for sponsored programs |
US20030233252A1 (en) | 2002-03-06 | 2003-12-18 | Haskell Robert Emmons | System and method for providing a generic health care data repository |
US7925576B2 (en) * | 2002-03-26 | 2011-04-12 | First Data Corporation | Systems for processing transponder-based transactions |
US7233928B2 (en) | 2002-04-12 | 2007-06-19 | Vendavo, Inc. | Rule-based system for determining price adjustments in a product catalog |
US8103605B2 (en) | 2002-04-12 | 2012-01-24 | Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. | Customs information system with selective transaction audit |
US8050938B1 (en) | 2002-04-19 | 2011-11-01 | Greenway Medical Technologies, Inc. | Integrated medical software system with enhanced portability |
US7363261B2 (en) | 2002-05-08 | 2008-04-22 | Regions Asset Company | Method, computer program product and system for verifying financial data |
WO2003096162A2 (en) * | 2002-05-10 | 2003-11-20 | Us Bancorp | Automated transaction processing system and approach |
US20030212617A1 (en) | 2002-05-13 | 2003-11-13 | Stone James S. | Accounts payable process |
US20030220863A1 (en) | 2002-05-24 | 2003-11-27 | Don Holm | System and method for varying electronic settlements between buyers and suppliers with dynamic discount terms |
US20040019562A1 (en) | 2002-06-03 | 2004-01-29 | Viberg Jon Jay | Term allowance clearinghouse |
AU2003239916A1 (en) | 2002-06-03 | 2003-12-19 | Sevenspace | System and method for reliable delivery of event information |
EP1535217A4 (en) * | 2002-06-11 | 2006-06-21 | First Data Corp | Value processing network and methods |
US7356516B2 (en) | 2002-06-13 | 2008-04-08 | Visa U.S.A. Inc. | Method and system for facilitating electronic dispute resolution |
US7801826B2 (en) | 2002-08-08 | 2010-09-21 | Fujitsu Limited | Framework and system for purchasing of goods and services |
US8121908B2 (en) | 2002-08-16 | 2012-02-21 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Data collection method and report generation apparatus including an automatch function for generating a report illustrating a field order and associated invoice |
US20040230601A1 (en) | 2002-09-09 | 2004-11-18 | Joao Raymond A. | Apparatus and method for facilitating shipping commerce |
US20070271160A1 (en) | 2002-09-12 | 2007-11-22 | The Pnc Financial Services Group, Inc. | Accounts payable process |
EP1403793A1 (en) | 2002-09-27 | 2004-03-31 | Sap Ag | Method for automatic integrated document filing in the logging of business transactions |
EP1559043A4 (en) | 2002-10-07 | 2005-12-28 | Gartner Inc | Methods and systems for evaluation of business performance |
US8577795B2 (en) | 2002-10-10 | 2013-11-05 | Convergys Information Management Group, Inc. | System and method for revenue and authorization management |
AU2003288976A1 (en) | 2002-10-29 | 2004-05-25 | Electronic Broking Services Limited | Trading system |
US7584192B2 (en) | 2002-11-18 | 2009-09-01 | Sap Aktiengesellschaft | Collection and analysis of document traffic in an electronic marketplace |
US20030093320A1 (en) | 2002-11-18 | 2003-05-15 | Sullivan Daniel L. | Method, system and computer program product for facilitating a tax transaction |
US7603300B2 (en) | 2002-11-18 | 2009-10-13 | Sap Aktiengesellschaft | Collection and analysis of trading data in an electronic marketplace |
US20040187075A1 (en) | 2003-01-08 | 2004-09-23 | Maxham Jason G. | Document management apparatus, system and method |
WO2004066542A2 (en) | 2003-01-23 | 2004-08-05 | Lortscher Frank Duane Jr | System and method for generating transaction based recommendations |
US7340422B2 (en) | 2003-02-10 | 2008-03-04 | Asentinel Llc | Systems and method for managing and processing of telecommunications invoices |
JP2004247947A (en) | 2003-02-13 | 2004-09-02 | Olympus Corp | Optical apparatus |
GB2398894A (en) | 2003-02-28 | 2004-09-01 | C6 Ltd | A networked computer system for selling/distributing goods/products directly or indirectly to a customer based on the customers status/rating. |
US20040172360A1 (en) | 2003-02-28 | 2004-09-02 | Mabrey Sheila M. | Methods and systems for managing accounts payable |
US20040181468A1 (en) | 2003-03-12 | 2004-09-16 | Richard Harmon | System and method of funding a charity |
US8510179B2 (en) | 2003-03-24 | 2013-08-13 | Siebel Systems, Inc. | Inventory transaction common object |
US7467639B2 (en) * | 2003-03-28 | 2008-12-23 | General Electric Company | Systems and methods for controlling gas flow |
US7005751B2 (en) | 2003-04-10 | 2006-02-28 | Formfactor, Inc. | Layered microelectronic contact and method for fabricating same |
US20110004544A1 (en) | 2003-04-17 | 2011-01-06 | Baum Diane T | Environmental audit method |
US8260673B2 (en) | 2003-05-09 | 2012-09-04 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method, system and computer program product for selective data disclosure and contract negotiation in an E-marketplace based on predetermined preferences |
US7796744B1 (en) | 2003-05-19 | 2010-09-14 | American Teleconferencing Services | Dynamic reporting tool for conferencing customers |
US7660788B1 (en) | 2003-05-23 | 2010-02-09 | E2Open, Inc. | Mapping part numbers and other identifiers |
US7113964B1 (en) | 2003-06-05 | 2006-09-26 | Iteration Software, Inc. | Method and apparatus for archiving data in a relational database system |
US7941353B2 (en) | 2003-06-17 | 2011-05-10 | Oracle International Corporation | Impacted financial statements |
US20050021527A1 (en) | 2003-07-10 | 2005-01-27 | Jian Zhang | System for resource accounting for multiple entities in an arbitrary value chain |
US20050015332A1 (en) | 2003-07-18 | 2005-01-20 | Grace Chen | Cashless payment system |
US20050021363A1 (en) | 2003-07-25 | 2005-01-27 | Stimson Gregory F. | Debit card per-transaction charitable contribution |
US7337950B2 (en) | 2003-07-28 | 2008-03-04 | Devault Ricky W | Transaction workflow and data collection system |
US7257560B2 (en) | 2003-07-31 | 2007-08-14 | Cisco Technology, Inc. | Cost minimization of services provided by multiple service providers |
SG120112A1 (en) | 2003-08-06 | 2006-03-28 | Oneempower Pte Ltd | Transaction method and system |
US20050240592A1 (en) | 2003-08-27 | 2005-10-27 | Ascential Software Corporation | Real time data integration for supply chain management |
US7548884B1 (en) | 2003-10-21 | 2009-06-16 | Neil Thomas | Computerized process to, for example, automate the home sale, mortgage loan financing and settlement process, and the home mortgage loan refinancing and settlement processes |
GB2407658A (en) | 2003-10-31 | 2005-05-04 | Daniele Grazioli | Computer network for processing received event data |
US20050125260A1 (en) | 2003-12-08 | 2005-06-09 | Agflex, Inc. | Method for quoting and contracting for management of inputs and services under a commercial service agreement, with a service loss guaranty or insurance policy and using an information management system |
US7386518B2 (en) | 2003-12-16 | 2008-06-10 | Pitney Bowes Inc. | Method and system for facilitating transactions |
US7958028B2 (en) | 2003-12-23 | 2011-06-07 | Sap Ag | Enterprise management application providing availability control checks on revenue budgets |
US20050149378A1 (en) | 2004-01-02 | 2005-07-07 | Cyr Keneth K. | System and method for management of clinical supply operations |
US8108269B2 (en) | 2004-02-27 | 2012-01-31 | Sap Ag | Systems and methods for managing product returns using decision codes |
CA2560271A1 (en) | 2004-03-18 | 2005-09-29 | Francisco Jauffred | Transportation management system and method for shipment planning optimization |
EP1738314A4 (en) | 2004-03-19 | 2009-12-02 | Oversight Technologies Inc | Methods and systems for transaction compliance monitoring |
US7373365B2 (en) | 2004-04-13 | 2008-05-13 | Satyam Computer Services, Ltd. | System and method for automatic indexing and archiving of paper documents |
US8660950B2 (en) * | 2004-04-16 | 2014-02-25 | Wells Fargo, N.A. | System and method for bill pay with credit card funding |
US7254588B2 (en) | 2004-04-26 | 2007-08-07 | Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company, Ltd. | Document management and access control by document's attributes for document query system |
US20050251478A1 (en) | 2004-05-04 | 2005-11-10 | Aura Yanavi | Investment and method for hedging operational risk associated with business events of another |
WO2005114526A2 (en) | 2004-05-19 | 2005-12-01 | Worldtax Network Llc | Method and system for processing tax pertaining to a goods and services transaction |
CA2569346A1 (en) | 2004-06-09 | 2005-12-29 | U.S. Bancorp Licensing, Inc. | Order-resource fulfillment and management system and approach |
CA2569338A1 (en) | 2004-06-09 | 2005-12-29 | U.S. Bancorp Licensing, Inc. | Financial institution-based transaction processing system and approach |
US20050278255A1 (en) | 2004-06-09 | 2005-12-15 | Hahn-Carlson Dean W | Transaction data exchange system and approach |
US7822653B2 (en) | 2004-06-09 | 2010-10-26 | Syncada Llc | Transaction accounting payment and classification system and approach |
US8762238B2 (en) | 2004-06-09 | 2014-06-24 | Syncada Llc | Recurring transaction processing system and approach |
US7925551B2 (en) | 2004-06-09 | 2011-04-12 | Syncada Llc | Automated transaction processing system and approach |
US8126785B2 (en) | 2004-06-09 | 2012-02-28 | Syncada Llc | Automated transaction accounting processing engine and approach |
US7574386B2 (en) | 2004-06-09 | 2009-08-11 | U.S. Bank National Association | Transaction accounting auditing approach and system therefor |
US7392934B2 (en) | 2004-06-09 | 2008-07-01 | U.S. Bank National Association | Transaction accounting processing system and approach |
US8554673B2 (en) | 2004-06-17 | 2013-10-08 | Jpmorgan Chase Bank, N.A. | Methods and systems for discounts management |
US20060010058A1 (en) | 2004-07-09 | 2006-01-12 | Microsoft Corporation | Multidimensional database currency conversion systems and methods |
US7529706B2 (en) | 2004-07-14 | 2009-05-05 | Yahoo! Inc. | Systems and methods for performing international money exchanges |
US7324976B2 (en) | 2004-07-19 | 2008-01-29 | Amazon Technologies, Inc. | Automatic authorization of programmatic transactions |
TWI397765B (en) | 2004-07-26 | 2013-06-01 | Pentax Ricoh Imaging Co Ltd | Stage apparatus and camera shake correction apparatus using the stage apparatus |
US8583514B2 (en) | 2004-08-13 | 2013-11-12 | Jeffrey Brian Klem | System and method for tracking information in a business environment |
US20060167792A1 (en) | 2004-12-29 | 2006-07-27 | Hahn-Carlson Dean W | Multi-supplier transaction and payment programmed processing system and approach |
US20060167791A1 (en) | 2004-12-29 | 2006-07-27 | Hahn-Carlson Dean W | Multi-party transaction processing system and approach |
US20070262140A1 (en) | 2005-02-03 | 2007-11-15 | Long Kenneth W Sr | Apparatus, System, and Method for Delivering Products or Services |
US7970671B2 (en) | 2005-04-12 | 2011-06-28 | Syncada Llc | Automated transaction processing system and approach with currency conversion |
US20060287983A1 (en) | 2005-06-16 | 2006-12-21 | Microsoft Corporation | Avoiding slow sections in an information search |
CA2625907A1 (en) | 2005-10-12 | 2007-04-19 | First Data Corporation | System and method for authorizing electronic payment transactions |
US20070282744A1 (en) | 2005-11-22 | 2007-12-06 | Primerevenue, Inc. | Supply chain financing and credit memo systems and methods |
US20070156584A1 (en) | 2005-11-22 | 2007-07-05 | Primerevenue, Inc. | Supply Chain Financing Systems and Methods |
US20070214077A1 (en) | 2006-02-21 | 2007-09-13 | Primerevenue, Inc. | Systems and methods for asset based lending (abl) valuation and pricing |
US20070282724A1 (en) | 2006-02-21 | 2007-12-06 | Primerevenue, Inc. | Asset based lending (abl) systems and methods |
US8103575B1 (en) | 2006-03-27 | 2012-01-24 | Icap Services North America Llc | System and method for use in auditing financial transactions |
US20070299769A1 (en) | 2006-06-21 | 2007-12-27 | E-Net Financial Services, Inc. | Lender selection system and method |
US7725372B2 (en) | 2006-10-06 | 2010-05-25 | Syncada Llc | Transaction payables processing system and approach |
US20110029404A1 (en) | 2006-10-06 | 2011-02-03 | Hahn-Carlson Dean W | Transaction payables processing system and approach |
US8712884B2 (en) | 2006-10-06 | 2014-04-29 | Syncada Llc | Transaction finance processing system and approach |
GB0621189D0 (en) | 2006-10-25 | 2006-12-06 | Payfont Ltd | Secure authentication and payment system |
US20080215456A1 (en) | 2006-11-14 | 2008-09-04 | Auctionpal, Llc | Systems and methods for facilitating exchanges of items |
US8751337B2 (en) | 2008-01-25 | 2014-06-10 | Syncada Llc | Inventory-based payment processing system and approach |
EP2321776A4 (en) | 2008-07-21 | 2012-01-04 | Syncada Llc | Resource-allocation processing system and approach with adaptive-assessment processing |
WO2010011681A1 (en) | 2008-07-21 | 2010-01-28 | Syncada Llc | Resource-allocation processing system and approach with resource pooling |
SG171805A1 (en) | 2008-11-26 | 2011-07-28 | Syncada Llc | Methods and arrangements involving adaptive auditing and rating for disparate data processing |
US20100205054A1 (en) | 2009-02-06 | 2010-08-12 | Hahn-Carlson Dean W | Contingency-based electronic auditing |
-
2005
- 2005-06-09 CA CA002569338A patent/CA2569338A1/en not_active Abandoned
- 2005-06-09 WO PCT/US2005/020632 patent/WO2005124640A2/en active Search and Examination
- 2005-06-09 MX MXPA06014351A patent/MXPA06014351A/en active IP Right Grant
- 2005-06-09 AU AU2005255453A patent/AU2005255453B2/en not_active Ceased
- 2005-06-09 EP EP05764244A patent/EP1782259A4/en not_active Withdrawn
- 2005-06-09 AU AU2005255457A patent/AU2005255457B2/en not_active Ceased
- 2005-06-09 EP EP05760308A patent/EP1782255A4/en not_active Withdrawn
- 2005-06-09 MX MXPA06014352A patent/MXPA06014352A/en active IP Right Grant
- 2005-06-09 WO PCT/US2005/020622 patent/WO2005124635A2/en active Application Filing
- 2005-06-09 WO PCT/US2005/020631 patent/WO2005124639A2/en active IP Right Grant
- 2005-06-09 CN CNA2005800191807A patent/CN101027687A/en active Pending
- 2005-06-09 AU AU2005255458A patent/AU2005255458B2/en not_active Ceased
- 2005-06-09 MX MXPA06014349A patent/MXPA06014349A/en active IP Right Grant
- 2005-06-09 EP EP05760844A patent/EP1779308A4/en not_active Withdrawn
- 2005-06-09 CN CNA200580019178XA patent/CN101031905A/en active Pending
- 2005-06-09 CA CA 2568584 patent/CA2568584A1/en not_active Abandoned
- 2005-06-09 CA CA 2569351 patent/CA2569351A1/en not_active Abandoned
- 2005-06-09 CN CNA2005800191794A patent/CN101385044A/en active Pending
- 2005-06-09 US US11/149,947 patent/US8560439B2/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
- 2005-09-12 US US11/149,977 patent/US20060015454A1/en not_active Abandoned
-
2009
- 2009-06-11 AU AU2009202302A patent/AU2009202302B2/en not_active Ceased
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
CN101027687A (en) | 2007-08-29 |
AU2009202302B2 (en) | 2011-12-22 |
EP1782259A4 (en) | 2009-04-22 |
US20050278251A1 (en) | 2005-12-15 |
EP1782255A2 (en) | 2007-05-09 |
CN101385044A (en) | 2009-03-11 |
AU2005255457B2 (en) | 2007-06-07 |
AU2009202302A1 (en) | 2009-07-02 |
WO2005124639A2 (en) | 2005-12-29 |
AU2005255453A1 (en) | 2005-12-29 |
WO2005124639A3 (en) | 2006-05-18 |
AU2005255458B2 (en) | 2007-11-15 |
EP1782259A2 (en) | 2007-05-09 |
WO2005124635A2 (en) | 2005-12-29 |
AU2005255458A1 (en) | 2005-12-29 |
CA2568584A1 (en) | 2005-12-29 |
AU2005255453B2 (en) | 2007-11-08 |
EP1779308A4 (en) | 2009-05-06 |
EP1779308A2 (en) | 2007-05-02 |
MXPA06014351A (en) | 2007-07-25 |
CN101031905A (en) | 2007-09-05 |
MXPA06014349A (en) | 2007-07-25 |
US8560439B2 (en) | 2013-10-15 |
EP1782255A4 (en) | 2009-04-29 |
WO2005124635A3 (en) | 2006-03-16 |
MXPA06014352A (en) | 2007-07-25 |
WO2005124640A3 (en) | 2008-01-10 |
AU2005255457A1 (en) | 2005-12-29 |
CA2569351A1 (en) | 2005-12-29 |
WO2005124640A2 (en) | 2005-12-29 |
US20060015454A1 (en) | 2006-01-19 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
AU2005255453B2 (en) | Financial institution-based transaction processing system and approach | |
US8595099B2 (en) | Financial institution-based transaction processing system and approach | |
AU2005330645B2 (en) | Automated transaction processing system and approach with currency conversion | |
US8825549B2 (en) | Transaction processing with core and distributor processor implementations | |
US8650119B2 (en) | Order-resource fulfillment and management system and approach | |
AU2008200560B2 (en) | Financial institution-based transaction processing system and approach | |
AU2008200685B2 (en) | Transaction processing with core and distributor processor implementations |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
FZDE | Discontinued |