EP0379828B1 - Radio frequency induction/multipole plasma processing tool - Google Patents

Radio frequency induction/multipole plasma processing tool Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP0379828B1
EP0379828B1 EP19890480185 EP89480185A EP0379828B1 EP 0379828 B1 EP0379828 B1 EP 0379828B1 EP 19890480185 EP19890480185 EP 19890480185 EP 89480185 A EP89480185 A EP 89480185A EP 0379828 B1 EP0379828 B1 EP 0379828B1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
chamber
plasma
work piece
induction
magnetic field
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Lifetime
Application number
EP19890480185
Other languages
German (de)
French (fr)
Other versions
EP0379828A3 (en
EP0379828A2 (en
Inventor
Dennis Keith Coultas
John Howard Keller
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
International Business Machines Corp
Original Assignee
International Business Machines Corp
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by International Business Machines Corp filed Critical International Business Machines Corp
Publication of EP0379828A2 publication Critical patent/EP0379828A2/en
Publication of EP0379828A3 publication Critical patent/EP0379828A3/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP0379828B1 publication Critical patent/EP0379828B1/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Lifetime legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • HELECTRICITY
    • H01ELECTRIC ELEMENTS
    • H01JELECTRIC DISCHARGE TUBES OR DISCHARGE LAMPS
    • H01J37/00Discharge tubes with provision for introducing objects or material to be exposed to the discharge, e.g. for the purpose of examination or processing thereof
    • H01J37/32Gas-filled discharge tubes
    • H01J37/32009Arrangements for generation of plasma specially adapted for examination or treatment of objects, e.g. plasma sources
    • H01J37/32082Radio frequency generated discharge
    • H01J37/321Radio frequency generated discharge the radio frequency energy being inductively coupled to the plasma
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H01ELECTRIC ELEMENTS
    • H01JELECTRIC DISCHARGE TUBES OR DISCHARGE LAMPS
    • H01J37/00Discharge tubes with provision for introducing objects or material to be exposed to the discharge, e.g. for the purpose of examination or processing thereof
    • H01J37/32Gas-filled discharge tubes
    • H01J37/32431Constructional details of the reactor
    • H01J37/32623Mechanical discharge control means
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H01ELECTRIC ELEMENTS
    • H01JELECTRIC DISCHARGE TUBES OR DISCHARGE LAMPS
    • H01J37/00Discharge tubes with provision for introducing objects or material to be exposed to the discharge, e.g. for the purpose of examination or processing thereof
    • H01J37/32Gas-filled discharge tubes
    • H01J37/32431Constructional details of the reactor
    • H01J37/3266Magnetic control means
    • H01J37/32688Multi-cusp fields

Definitions

  • This invention relates to an apparatus according to the first part of claim 1 for plasma processing of substrates, and more particularly to subtractive (etching) and additive (deposition) processing of electronic circuit chips and packaging materials.
  • the problem with capacitive coupling of R.F. energy to a plasma employed for etching or depositing films is that to increase power to the level required to generate the plasma required, the voltage will be so high that the charged particles in the plasma will be accelerated to an excessive level of kinetic energy and will tend to sputter the work piece and to etch or sputter away any masks.
  • the effect will be to chamfer the mask opening, i.e. increase the size of openings in masks by etching the edges of the masks.
  • the effect also leads to ion damage and loss of selectivity. This is unacceptable as the requirements in the art are to decrease the size of openings as dimensions are decreasing in microelectronics. Instead one would like the flexibility of varying the ion energy according to the desired process.
  • U.S. patent 3,705,091 of Jacob for "Gas Discharge Apparatus” shows a cylindrical glass reaction chamber coaxially wound with a helical R.F. coil energized by high frequency (13.5 mHz) R.F. to generate a plasma in a vacuum for etching of a tray of semiconductor slices.
  • the system operates in the 1 Torr (1.3 x 102 Pa) pressure range and produces mainly reactive radicals.
  • the Jacob system does not operate in the desired reactive ion etching, RIE mode of this invention.
  • the Jacob system In the pressure range desired for the present invention of 1 to 50 mTorr (1.3 x 10 ⁇ 1to 6,5 Pa), the Jacob system would produce very non-uniform and very slow etching. No means for confining the plasma is shown.
  • Desilets et al describes a reactive ion etching tool having a cylindrical reactive ion etching chamber acting as an anode and a plate arrangement acting as a cathode and wherein an R.F. signal applied between cathode and anode acts to produce an active glow region within the chamber with a dark space existing over the internal surfaces thereof.
  • a reactive ion etching chamber structure has an internal top surface and sidewall surfaces forming a physically symmetrical arrangement with respect to the cathode plate positioned between the sidewall surfaces below the top surface, the top surface and surfaces being uniform except for gas input and exhaust ports with the gas exhaust ports having an opening dimension less than the thickness of the dark space existing over the internal surface.
  • EP-A- 184 812 describes a plasma dry processing apparatus according to the first part of claim 1 having a chamber, induction means for providing an RF induction field and confinement means.
  • EP-A- 261 922 disclose an electrode assembly and apparatus using magnets to trap electrons adjacent the walls of the hole of the electrode producing the plasma.
  • US-A- 4 431 898 describes an apparatus for plasma etching of semiconductor devices.
  • a plasma chamber is inductively coupled to a source of A.C. power wherein the semiconductor devices are etched.
  • EP-A- 115 970 describes a plasma etching apparatus comprising on its chamber walls a liner being substantially inert to a plasma.
  • EP-A- 203 560 discloses a plasma etching apparatus comprising manifold means and orifice means.
  • Objects of this invention are :
  • FIG. 1 shows a sectional view of a plasma treatment system in accordance with this invention.
  • FIG. 2. shows a magnetic multipole arrangement for confinement of a plasma in accordance with this invention.
  • FIG. 3 shows a schematic diagram of some elements of the plasma system of FIG. 1.
  • FIG. 4. shows a plan view of the involute or spiral shaped R.F. induction field coil in the system of FIG. 1 in accordance with this invention.
  • FIG. 5 is a graph of ion current vs R.F. power for three plasma processing systems.
  • FIG. 1 shows apparatus 9 which includes an evacuated chamber 10 containing a semiconductor wafer 11 that comprises a work piece to be treated with a plasma process.
  • a gas is admitted to chamber 10 from annular manifold 14 via annular orifice 15. The gas is used to form a plasma for processing of wafer 11 by etching or deposition.
  • a liner 16 forming a cylindrical outer wall contains the gas which is to be energized to form a plasma.
  • liner 16 is composed of quartz or another material which is nearly, i.e. substantially, inert or noncontaminating to the plasma to be contained in plasma processing chamber 10.
  • the cover 17 of the chamber 10 is composed of quartz also.
  • the chamber 10 is surrounded by quartz lined liner 16 and cover 17 on the sides and the top with the wafer 11 on the bottom.
  • the wafer 11 is supported on metallic base 23, but is insulated therefrom by an insulating coating on the upper surface of base 23.
  • a flat insulating ring 40 is provided on top of base 23 at the periphery of the wafer 11 and with an indentation 32 for supporting the edges of wafer 11. Ring 40 separates the plasma from the surfaces below, and it is shown shaped with indentation 32 to retain the wafer 11 in a central position at the base of chamber 10.
  • the gas is admitted to the chamber 10 from gas input port 12 through line 13 to annular manifold 14 formed by annular base 27 and the cover 17.
  • the manifold 14 is about 0.275 inches (0.7 cm) deep.
  • the manifold 14 is connected to chamber 10 through a circumferential, narrow annular orifice 15 of about 0.005 inches (0.0127 cm) which maintains sufficient pressure of the gas in manifold 14 that the gas is distributed at a relatively uniform pressure about the entire circumference of the top of chamber 10.
  • the gas in manifold 14 passes through orifice 15 between the top of the lip of annular base 27 and the lower surface of cover 17 in substantially equal quantities per unit time all about the circumferential area, i.e.
  • the pressure of the gas in chamber 10 is at a low pressure of about 1-5 mTorr (1,3 x 10 ⁇ 1 to 6,5 x 10 ⁇ 1Pa).
  • the gas to be exhausted from chamber 10 passes through annular orifice 18 at the base of the liner 16 or between magnets 21 into exhaust vacuum pumping manifold 19 and out through port 89, which is connected to vacuum pumps (not shown for convenience of illustration).
  • Apparatus to provide magnetic confinement of the plasma is employed in the form of multiple-magnetic-dipoles (multipoles) 21 with vertical axes as shown in FIGS. 1, 2 and 3.
  • the multipoles 21 have their fields directed at right angles towards the vertical axis of the cylindrical chamber 10.
  • Multipoles 21 are arranged about the periphery of liner 16 in the classic magnetic confinement cylindrical arrangement.
  • the multipoles have their magnetic field directed inwardly as indicated by the plan view in FIG. 2. With this arrangement the alternating of the north and south poles (of multipoles 21) directed inwardly, looking down as in FIG.
  • a radio frequency induction (R.F.I.) coil 22 is wound in a spiral or involute form on top of quartz cover 17 of chamber 10 as shown in FIG. 4. The coil 22 is energized by a 13MHz radio frequency source 30 with a power of about 300 watts per amp of ions of the gas.
  • Source 30 is connected by line 38 to the outer end of coil 22 at terminal 47.
  • the other end of source 30 is also connected to ground completing the circuit.
  • the inner end of spiral coil 22 is connected at terminal 28 by line 46 through switch 48 and line 39 to a bond 29 on the grounded wall 31 of apparatus 9 which is at electrical ground.
  • magnetic multipole confinement by magnets 32 located above cover 17 on its surface can be added adjacent to coil 22 to reduce the plasma loss to cover 17.
  • Reactance 50 can be a variable or fixed reactance which is capacitive or inductive, as desired, to adjust the R.F. bias on the plasma.
  • the connection of reactance 50 in series with coil 22, between terminal 28 and ground connection 29, is employed for the case where one is using the R.F. coil 22 alone, i.e. not using R.F. bias from source 24.
  • Reactance 50 is useful in a case in which it is desired to use R.F. induction without the R.F. bias from source 24. In this case one can vary the ion energy over a somewhat smaller range 10eV to 80 eV.
  • one varies the impedance to ground (from the center of the coil 22, bypassing line 39 when switch 48 is opened to close the circuit to ground through reactance 50 and lines 49, 51 and 39 as well as bond 29).
  • This allows one to go from the smallest amount of capacitive coupling (equivalent to middle turn 34 being at R.F. ground potential) with a value of capacitive impedance equal to one half of the coils inductive impedance to somewhat more capacitive coupling for reactance 50 being inductive.
  • coil 22 includes a spiral with terminals, tapped holes comprising terminals 28 and 47 respectively for joining lines 28 and 38 to coil 22.
  • Coil 22 is shown having three turns with the second (middle) turn 34 from transition 33 to transition 35 being substantially wider to enhance the inductive qualities of the coil 22.
  • Both the outer turn 36 and the inner turn 37 are of about the same width.
  • the advantage of this design is that the plasma is more uniform beneath the second (middle) turn 34 than it would be with a coil with a single width. In general this principle applies regardless of how many turns are involved. What is involved with the variation in width (i.e. cross-sectional area) is that the inductances of the three turns are rebalanced.
  • the R.F. energy from the coil 22 ionizes the gas in chamber 10 into a sustained plasma for additive or subtractive processing of the wafer 11.
  • the wafer 11 is supported on metallic base 23.
  • Metallic base 23 cools wafer 11 with electrostatic clamping and backside cooling not shown for convenience of illustration, but as is well understood by those skilled in the art.
  • Base 23 is connected to an R.F. biasing source 24 at a frequency above about 13 MHz, preferably at 40 MHz which sets up an R.F. bias between the wafer 11 and the plasma, leading to a D.C. bias on the wafer 11.
  • the use of different frequencies reduces coupling between the two power supplies.
  • the high frequency R.F. bias gives a more monotonic distribution of ion energy, so there is improved control of ion energy for better selectivity of the rate of etching.
  • This R.F. bias provides ion energy control of the ions from the plasma as the R.F. level of the base 23 is varied by R.F. source 24.
  • a dark space exists upon the upper surface of the wafer 11.
  • the use of R.F. coil 22 instead of a capacitively coupled R.F. electrode to generate the plasma affords the advantage of reducing and controlling the kinetic energy of the ions striking the walls of liner 16 and wafer 11, thereby reducing the damage that can be done by ions and electrons at the high energy levels required for plasma processing contemplated for use with this apparatus. This also gives the flexibility of adjusting the ion energy according to process needs.
  • FIG. 5 is a graph of ion current vs R.F. power for three plasma processing systems.
  • One curve is for R.F. power supplied to induction coil 22 employed in the instant embodiment, which produces a linear curve.
  • the dotted curve in FIG. 5 is for a system in which the plasma is generated by a particular electroncyclotronresonance (ECR) device.
  • ECR electroncyclotronresonance
  • the other dotted curve is for a system in which the plasma is formed by an R.F. diode, i.e. capacitively coupled R.F.. It can be seen that at higher power levels, the R.F. induction produces far higher ion current at a given power level plus a linear rate of increase which are both preferred characteristics. Ion current does not saturate as power increases, so very high plasma densities can be achieved at low ion kinetic energies.
  • This system and method is useful for both plasma etching and plasma coating processes, particularly in fields such as large scale integrated semiconductor devices and packages therefor. Other fields requiring microfabrication will also find use for this invention.
  • This system can replace wet HF solutions for etching of thin layers.

Description

    BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION Field of the Invention
  • This invention relates to an apparatus according to the first part of claim 1 for plasma processing of substrates, and more particularly to subtractive (etching) and additive (deposition) processing of electronic circuit chips and packaging materials.
  • Technical Problem
  • The problem with capacitive coupling of R.F. energy to a plasma employed for etching or depositing films is that to increase power to the level required to generate the plasma required, the voltage will be so high that the charged particles in the plasma will be accelerated to an excessive level of kinetic energy and will tend to sputter the work piece and to etch or sputter away any masks. The effect will be to chamfer the mask opening, i.e. increase the size of openings in masks by etching the edges of the masks. The effect also leads to ion damage and loss of selectivity. This is unacceptable as the requirements in the art are to decrease the size of openings as dimensions are decreasing in microelectronics. Instead one would like the flexibility of varying the ion energy according to the desired process.
  • Related Art
  • U.S. patent 3,705,091 of Jacob for "Gas Discharge Apparatus" shows a cylindrical glass reaction chamber coaxially wound with a helical R.F. coil energized by high frequency (13.5 mHz) R.F. to generate a plasma in a vacuum for etching of a tray of semiconductor slices. The system operates in the 1 Torr (1.3 x 10² Pa) pressure range and produces mainly reactive radicals. The Jacob system does not operate in the desired reactive ion etching, RIE mode of this invention. In the pressure range desired for the present invention of 1 to 50 mTorr (1.3 x 10⁻¹to 6,5 Pa), the Jacob system would produce very non-uniform and very slow etching. No means for confining the plasma is shown.
  • M. C. Vella, K. W. Ehlers, D. Kippenhan, P. A. Pincosy, and R. V. Pyle "Development of R.F. Plasma Generators for Neutral Beams", J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 3(3), (May/June 1985) pp 1218-1221 describes an R.F. plasma source used to generate a high power neutral beam to heat a large fusion plasma to reaction temperatures. The pressure is from 1 to 20 mTorr (2,6 Pa). A plurality of magnetic dipoles surround the rf bucket chamber to create a magnetic shield for the plasma. There is no reference to additive or substractive treatment of a substrate. Vella et al teaches the use of R.F. induction for plasma production, but it does not teach the use of R.F. induction for etching or deposition where the plasma will etch the coating on an R.F. coil and coat the insulators.
  • R. Limpaecher and K. R. MacKenzie, "Magnetic Multipole Containment of Large Uniform Collisionless Quiescent Plasmas", Rev. Sci. Instrum., Vol. 44, No. 6, (June 1973) 726-731 discusses the use of magnetic multipoles for confinement of a plasma or argon at a pressure of 0.002 Torr (2.6 x 10⁻¹Pa). This reference is one of the original papers on multipole confinement of the primary electrons in plasma production from electron emission from a hot filament. U.S. patent No. 4,483,737 of Mantei, "Method and Apparatus for Plasma Etching a Substrate" uses an electrically heated filament to emit electrons, but states at Col. 5, lines 53-65, that a hollow cathode or ion cyclotron resonance can be used to generate electrons. Later, it states that R.F. power sources are not used for the discharge current or for generation of the surface magnetic field confining the plasma. At Col. 6, lines 52-58, it states "The plasma is produced by impact from fast ionizing electrons drawn from a set of heated tungsten filaments, rather than by an applied rf voltage."
  • See also T. D. Mantei and T. Wicker, "Plasma Etching with Surface Magnetic Field Confinement" Appl. Phys. Lett. 43(1), (1 July 1983) pp. 84-86, and T. D. Mantei and T. Wicker, "Low Pressure Plasma Etching with Magnetic Confinement", Solid State Technology (April 1985) pp. 263-265.
  • I. Lin, D.C. Hinson, W. H. Class, R. L. Sandstrom, "Low-Energy High Flux Reactive Ion Etching by R.F. Magnetron Plasma", Appl. Phys. Lett. Vol. 44 (Jan. 15 1984) pp. 185-187 describes magnetic confinement of a plasma and R.F. power being used for plasma production. The R.F. power is capacitively coupled to a copper prism used as an electrode. This is one of many magnetron reactive ion etching systems. Most of them involve an effort to achieve uniformity from a system in which the electron density increases in the direction of E x B drift of secondary electrons from the cathode. These systems also provide limited adjustability of the energy of the ions striking a wafer.
  • U.S. patent No. 4,632,719 of Chow et al for "Semiconductor Etching Apparatus with Magnetic Array and Vertical Shield" describes etching a semiconductor wafer in an R.F. field in argon gas. A pair of rings of concentric dipoles above the wafer create a pair of rings in the plasma above the wafer. This leads to the kind of lack of uniformity of the plasma which would be avoided in systems required to provide uniform etching or deposition. Thus the Chow et al patent would lead one in the opposite direction from the purpose to which this invention is directed.
    U.S. patent No.4,384,938 "Reactive Ion Etching Chamber" of B. Desilets et al describes a reactive ion etching tool having a cylindrical reactive ion etching chamber acting as an anode and a plate arrangement acting as a cathode and wherein an R.F. signal applied between cathode and anode acts to produce an active glow region within the chamber with a dark space existing over the internal surfaces thereof. A reactive ion etching chamber structure has an internal top surface and sidewall surfaces forming a physically symmetrical arrangement with respect to the cathode plate positioned between the sidewall surfaces below the top surface, the top surface and surfaces being uniform except for gas input and exhaust ports with the gas exhaust ports having an opening dimension less than the thickness of the dark space existing over the internal surface.
  • EP-A- 184 812 describes a plasma dry processing apparatus according to the first part of claim 1 having a chamber, induction means for providing an RF induction field and confinement means.
  • EP-A- 261 922, disclose an electrode assembly and apparatus using magnets to trap electrons adjacent the walls of the hole of the electrode producing the plasma.
  • US-A- 4 431 898 describes an apparatus for plasma etching of semiconductor devices. A plasma chamber is inductively coupled to a source of A.C. power wherein the semiconductor devices are etched.
  • EP-A- 115 970 describes a plasma etching apparatus comprising on its chamber walls a liner being substantially inert to a plasma.
  • EP-A- 203 560 discloses a plasma etching apparatus comprising manifold means and orifice means.
  • See also Keller et al U.S. Patent No. 4,383,177 for "Multipole Implantation Isotope Separation Ion Beam Source".
  • Objects of this invention are :
    • a) a uniform plasma,
    • b) plasma density which does not saturate with power,
    • c) control of ion energy,
    • d) high etch rates for a given power level, and
    • e) relative simplicity.
  • These objects are provided by means of the apparatus defined in claim 1. The dependent claims describe particular embodiments of the invention.
  • BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
  • FIG. 1 shows a sectional view of a plasma treatment system in accordance with this invention.
  • FIG. 2. shows a magnetic multipole arrangement for confinement of a plasma in accordance with this invention.
  • FIG. 3 shows a schematic diagram of some elements of the plasma system of FIG. 1.
  • FIG. 4. shows a plan view of the involute or spiral shaped R.F. induction field coil in the system of FIG. 1 in accordance with this invention.
  • FIG. 5 is a graph of ion current vs R.F. power for three plasma processing systems.
  • DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT
  • FIG. 1 shows apparatus 9 which includes an evacuated chamber 10 containing a semiconductor wafer 11 that comprises a work piece to be treated with a plasma process. A gas is admitted to chamber 10 from annular manifold 14 via annular orifice 15. The gas is used to form a plasma for processing of wafer 11 by etching or deposition. A liner 16 forming a cylindrical outer wall contains the gas which is to be energized to form a plasma.
  • Preferably, liner 16 is composed of quartz or another material which is nearly, i.e. substantially, inert or noncontaminating to the plasma to be contained in plasma processing chamber 10. The cover 17 of the chamber 10 is composed of quartz also. Thus the chamber 10 is surrounded by quartz lined liner 16 and cover 17 on the sides and the top with the wafer 11 on the bottom. The wafer 11 is supported on metallic base 23, but is insulated therefrom by an insulating coating on the upper surface of base 23. A flat insulating ring 40 is provided on top of base 23 at the periphery of the wafer 11 and with an indentation 32 for supporting the edges of wafer 11. Ring 40 separates the plasma from the surfaces below, and it is shown shaped with indentation 32 to retain the wafer 11 in a central position at the base of chamber 10.
  • The gas is admitted to the chamber 10 from gas input port 12 through line 13 to annular manifold 14 formed by annular base 27 and the cover 17. The manifold 14 is about 0.275 inches (0.7 cm) deep. The manifold 14 is connected to chamber 10 through a circumferential, narrow annular orifice 15 of about 0.005 inches (0.0127 cm) which maintains sufficient pressure of the gas in manifold 14 that the gas is distributed at a relatively uniform pressure about the entire circumference of the top of chamber 10. The gas in manifold 14 passes through orifice 15 between the top of the lip of annular base 27 and the lower surface of cover 17 in substantially equal quantities per unit time all about the circumferential area, i.e. the periphery, at the top of chamber 10 so that the plasma will be more highly uniform within the chamber 10. Preferably, the pressure of the gas in chamber 10 is at a low pressure of about 1-5 mTorr (1,3 x 10⁻¹ to 6,5 x 10⁻¹Pa). The gas to be exhausted from chamber 10 passes through annular orifice 18 at the base of the liner 16 or between magnets 21 into exhaust vacuum pumping manifold 19 and out through port 89, which is connected to vacuum pumps (not shown for convenience of illustration).
  • Apparatus to provide magnetic confinement of the plasma is employed in the form of multiple-magnetic-dipoles (multipoles) 21 with vertical axes as shown in FIGS. 1, 2 and 3. The multipoles 21 have their fields directed at right angles towards the vertical axis of the cylindrical chamber 10. Multipoles 21 are arranged about the periphery of liner 16 in the classic magnetic confinement cylindrical arrangement. The multipoles have their magnetic field directed inwardly as indicated by the plan view in FIG. 2. With this arrangement the alternating of the north and south poles (of multipoles 21) directed inwardly, looking down as in FIG. 2, provide a wall of magnetic field forces which repel electrons back into the interior of chamber 10, thereby reducing the number of activated ions striking the walls and varying the uniformity of concentration of the plasma near the wafer 11. As can be seen in FIG. 2, the magnetic field contains cusps 20 pointing towards the multipoles 21. It will be obvious to those skilled in the art that magnets 21 can provide cylindrical cusps instead of line cusps. A radio frequency induction (R.F.I.) coil 22 is wound in a spiral or involute form on top of quartz cover 17 of chamber 10 as shown in FIG. 4. The coil 22 is energized by a 13MHz radio frequency source 30 with a power of about 300 watts per amp of ions of the gas. Source 30 is connected by line 38 to the outer end of coil 22 at terminal 47. The other end of source 30 is also connected to ground completing the circuit. The inner end of spiral coil 22 is connected at terminal 28 by line 46 through switch 48 and line 39 to a bond 29 on the grounded wall 31 of apparatus 9 which is at electrical ground.
  • Referring to FIG. 3, for higher density plasmas, magnetic multipole confinement by magnets 32 located above cover 17 on its surface can be added adjacent to coil 22 to reduce the plasma loss to cover 17.
  • Switch 48 shorts out lines 49 and 51 which connect a reactance 50 in series with R.F. coil 22. Reactance 50 can be a variable or fixed reactance which is capacitive or inductive, as desired, to adjust the R.F. bias on the plasma. The connection of reactance 50 in series with coil 22, between terminal 28 and ground connection 29, is employed for the case where one is using the R.F. coil 22 alone, i.e. not using R.F. bias from source 24. Reactance 50 is useful in a case in which it is desired to use R.F. induction without the R.F. bias from source 24. In this case one can vary the ion energy over a somewhat smaller range 10eV to 80 eV. In accordance with this aspect of the invention one varies the impedance to ground (from the center of the coil 22, bypassing line 39 when switch 48 is opened to close the circuit to ground through reactance 50 and lines 49, 51 and 39 as well as bond 29). This allows one to go from the smallest amount of capacitive coupling (equivalent to middle turn 34 being at R.F. ground potential) with a value of capacitive impedance equal to one half of the coils inductive impedance to somewhat more capacitive coupling for reactance 50 being inductive.
  • Referring to FIG. 4, coil 22 includes a spiral with terminals, tapped holes comprising terminals 28 and 47 respectively for joining lines 28 and 38 to coil 22. Coil 22 is shown having three turns with the second (middle) turn 34 from transition 33 to transition 35 being substantially wider to enhance the inductive qualities of the coil 22. Both the outer turn 36 and the inner turn 37 are of about the same width. The advantage of this design is that the plasma is more uniform beneath the second (middle) turn 34 than it would be with a coil with a single width. In general this principle applies regardless of how many turns are involved. What is involved with the variation in width (i.e. cross-sectional area) is that the inductances of the three turns are rebalanced.
  • The R.F. energy from the coil 22 ionizes the gas in chamber 10 into a sustained plasma for additive or subtractive processing of the wafer 11. The wafer 11 is supported on metallic base 23. Metallic base 23 cools wafer 11 with electrostatic clamping and backside cooling not shown for convenience of illustration, but as is well understood by those skilled in the art. Base 23 is connected to an R.F. biasing source 24 at a frequency above about 13 MHz, preferably at 40 MHz which sets up an R.F. bias between the wafer 11 and the plasma, leading to a D.C. bias on the wafer 11. The use of different frequencies reduces coupling between the two power supplies. The high frequency R.F. bias gives a more monotonic distribution of ion energy, so there is improved control of ion energy for better selectivity of the rate of etching.
  • This R.F. bias provides ion energy control of the ions from the plasma as the R.F. level of the base 23 is varied by R.F. source 24. A dark space exists upon the upper surface of the wafer 11. The use of R.F. coil 22 instead of a capacitively coupled R.F. electrode to generate the plasma affords the advantage of reducing and controlling the kinetic energy of the ions striking the walls of liner 16 and wafer 11, thereby reducing the damage that can be done by ions and electrons at the high energy levels required for plasma processing contemplated for use with this apparatus. This also gives the flexibility of adjusting the ion energy according to process needs.
  • In the exhaust manifold or chamber 19 are located cylindrical walls of vertical screening 25 which extends from top to bottom in chamber 19 and a shorter wall of screening 26 which extends from the bottom of annular base 27 to the bottom of chamber 19. Screening 25 and 26 are included to provide grounded surfaces which will prevent the plasma from extending far into the manifold 19. Nylon bolts 42 secure base 23 to apparatus 9 with the O-ring gasket 41 sealing the chamber 10 from the atmosphere.
  • Gases suitable for use in forming the plasma are well known and some of them are listed as exemplary gases.
       CCl₂F₂   + 20%SF₆
       C₃F₈   + 16%SF₆
       C₃F₈
       CF₄
       O₂
       Ar   + 10%O₂
  • FIG. 5 is a graph of ion current vs R.F. power for three plasma processing systems. One curve is for R.F. power supplied to induction coil 22 employed in the instant embodiment, which produces a linear curve. As is well known to those skilled in the art, the dotted curve in FIG. 5 is for a system in which the plasma is generated by a particular electroncyclotronresonance (ECR) device.
  • The other dotted curve is for a system in which the plasma is formed by an R.F. diode, i.e. capacitively coupled R.F.. It can be seen that at higher power levels, the R.F. induction produces far higher ion current at a given power level plus a linear rate of increase which are both preferred characteristics. Ion current does not saturate as power increases, so very high plasma densities can be achieved at low ion kinetic energies.
  • This system and method is useful for both plasma etching and plasma coating processes, particularly in fields such as large scale integrated semiconductor devices and packages therefor. Other fields requiring microfabrication will also find use for this invention.
  • In plasma annealing of gate oxides or oxide isolation, one should avoid any peak-to-peak voltages above the "K alpha" energies of carbon, nitrogen and oxygen which are about 283, 401 and 532 respectively. Concomitantly, one desires a high density of atomic and ion hydrogen. This is is very difficult to achieve employing capacitively coupled R.F., even in the magnetron modes. We have found that it is easily achieved when employing an R.F. inductively coupled plasma.
  • This system can replace wet HF solutions for etching of thin layers.

Claims (7)

  1. A plasma dry processing apparatus comprising:
    a) a chamber (10) for plasma processing having an external wall, said chamber containing at least one work piece (11) having a surface to be processed in a plasma; and
    b) induction means (22) comprising an induction coil for providing a radio frequency induction field within said chamber for generating a plasma within said chamber; said induction coil being located at an end of said chamber spaced substantially from said work piece; and
    c) confining means (21) for providing a surface magnetic field for confining said plasma within said chamber; said confing means comprising multiple magnetic dipoles (21) with their fields directed inwardly towards the interior of said chamber with alternating north and south poles in a magnetic confinement cylindrical arrangement with their fields directed at right angles towards the vertical axis of said chamber, said surface magnetic field being substantially confined to the space adjacent to said external wall with said surface magnetic field extending from the exterior of said chamber to provide magnetic field cusps (20) proximate to the periphery of the interior of said external wall;
    characterized in that said work piece is located at one end of said chamber and that said induction coil is an involute, spiral induction coil located at the other end on the exterior of said chamber;
    whereby electrons are repelled to the interior of said chamber from motion towards the walls thereof to produce greater uniformity of the plasma near said work piece.
  2. Apparatus according to claim 1 further including radio frequency energization means (30) for providing a R.F. generated bias to said work piece.
  3. Apparatus according to claim 1 or 2 wherein said chamber (10) is lined with a liner material (16) substantially inert to a plasma or substantially noncontaminating to said work piece, and said induction means is located on the exterior of said liner material on said opposite end of said chamber from said work piece.
  4. Apparatus according to claim 1 or 2 wherein means are provided for uniformly admitting a gas to said chamber comprising:
    a) manifold means (14) located about the periphery of said chamber at the opposite end of said chamber from said work piece; and
    b) orifice means (15) located between the surface of said chamber and said manifold means (14) for admitting said gas from said manifold into said chamber;
    whereby said gas is admitted to said chamber from said manifold with a substantially uniform pressure so that said plasma will be uniform within said chamber.
  5. Apparatus according to claim 2 including means (32) for providing a surface magnetic field positioned adjacent to said induction means.
  6. Apparatus according to claim 1 including reactance means (50) connected in series with said induction means, whereby one can produce and adjust a radio frequency generated bias.
  7. Apparatus according to claim 1 where said involute spiral coil (22) includes a larger cross section between the end windings thereof;
    whereby more uniform plasma is produced adjacent to said larger cross section windings than a winding of uniform cross section.
EP19890480185 1989-01-25 1989-12-19 Radio frequency induction/multipole plasma processing tool Expired - Lifetime EP0379828B1 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US30193389A 1989-01-25 1989-01-25
US301933 1989-01-25

Publications (3)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP0379828A2 EP0379828A2 (en) 1990-08-01
EP0379828A3 EP0379828A3 (en) 1991-01-09
EP0379828B1 true EP0379828B1 (en) 1995-09-27

Family

ID=23165518

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP19890480185 Expired - Lifetime EP0379828B1 (en) 1989-01-25 1989-12-19 Radio frequency induction/multipole plasma processing tool

Country Status (3)

Country Link
EP (1) EP0379828B1 (en)
JP (1) JPH0770532B2 (en)
DE (1) DE68924413T2 (en)

Cited By (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5985742A (en) 1997-05-12 1999-11-16 Silicon Genesis Corporation Controlled cleavage process and device for patterned films
US6221740B1 (en) 1999-08-10 2001-04-24 Silicon Genesis Corporation Substrate cleaving tool and method
US6263941B1 (en) 1999-08-10 2001-07-24 Silicon Genesis Corporation Nozzle for cleaving substrates
US6284631B1 (en) 1997-05-12 2001-09-04 Silicon Genesis Corporation Method and device for controlled cleaving process
US6632324B2 (en) 1995-07-19 2003-10-14 Silicon Genesis Corporation System for the plasma treatment of large area substrates
US9362439B2 (en) 2008-05-07 2016-06-07 Silicon Genesis Corporation Layer transfer of films utilizing controlled shear region

Families Citing this family (52)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4948458A (en) * 1989-08-14 1990-08-14 Lam Research Corporation Method and apparatus for producing magnetically-coupled planar plasma
US5280154A (en) * 1992-01-30 1994-01-18 International Business Machines Corporation Radio frequency induction plasma processing system utilizing a uniform field coil
US5241245A (en) * 1992-05-06 1993-08-31 International Business Machines Corporation Optimized helical resonator for plasma processing
AU5017293A (en) * 1992-09-01 1994-03-29 University Of North Carolina At Chapel Hill, The High pressure magnetically assisted inductively coupled plasma
US6136140A (en) * 1993-01-12 2000-10-24 Tokyo Electron Limited Plasma processing apparatus
USRE40963E1 (en) * 1993-01-12 2009-11-10 Tokyo Electron Limited Method for plasma processing by shaping an induced electric field
KR100238627B1 (en) * 1993-01-12 2000-01-15 히가시 데쓰로 Plasma processing apparatus
US5433812A (en) * 1993-01-19 1995-07-18 International Business Machines Corporation Apparatus for enhanced inductive coupling to plasmas with reduced sputter contamination
US5565114A (en) * 1993-03-04 1996-10-15 Tokyo Electron Limited Method and device for detecting the end point of plasma process
TW260857B (en) * 1993-03-04 1995-10-21 Tokyo Electron Co Ltd
FR2707449B1 (en) * 1993-07-05 1995-08-11 Cit Alcatel Plasma reactor for a deposition or etching process.
US5614055A (en) * 1993-08-27 1997-03-25 Applied Materials, Inc. High density plasma CVD and etching reactor
TW273067B (en) * 1993-10-04 1996-03-21 Tokyo Electron Co Ltd
US5529657A (en) * 1993-10-04 1996-06-25 Tokyo Electron Limited Plasma processing apparatus
TW293983B (en) * 1993-12-17 1996-12-21 Tokyo Electron Co Ltd
US5518547A (en) * 1993-12-23 1996-05-21 International Business Machines Corporation Method and apparatus for reducing particulates in a plasma tool through steady state flows
US5783492A (en) * 1994-03-04 1998-07-21 Tokyo Electron Limited Plasma processing method, plasma processing apparatus, and plasma generating apparatus
US5522934A (en) * 1994-04-26 1996-06-04 Tokyo Electron Limited Plasma processing apparatus using vertical gas inlets one on top of another
EP0680072B1 (en) 1994-04-28 2003-10-08 Applied Materials, Inc. A method of operating a high density plasma CVD reactor with combined inductive and capacitive coupling
JP3171222B2 (en) * 1994-06-14 2001-05-28 日本電気株式会社 Microwave plasma processing equipment
US5587038A (en) * 1994-06-16 1996-12-24 Princeton University Apparatus and process for producing high density axially extending plasmas
US5540800A (en) * 1994-06-23 1996-07-30 Applied Materials, Inc. Inductively coupled high density plasma reactor for plasma assisted materials processing
US5540824A (en) * 1994-07-18 1996-07-30 Applied Materials Plasma reactor with multi-section RF coil and isolated conducting lid
US5521351A (en) * 1994-08-30 1996-05-28 Wisconsin Alumni Research Foundation Method and apparatus for plasma surface treatment of the interior of hollow forms
US5753044A (en) * 1995-02-15 1998-05-19 Applied Materials, Inc. RF plasma reactor with hybrid conductor and multi-radius dome ceiling
US5777289A (en) 1995-02-15 1998-07-07 Applied Materials, Inc. RF plasma reactor with hybrid conductor and multi-radius dome ceiling
EP0710055B1 (en) 1994-10-31 1999-06-23 Applied Materials, Inc. Plasma reactors for processing semi-conductor wafers
US5688357A (en) * 1995-02-15 1997-11-18 Applied Materials, Inc. Automatic frequency tuning of an RF power source of an inductively coupled plasma reactor
US6270617B1 (en) 1995-02-15 2001-08-07 Applied Materials, Inc. RF plasma reactor with hybrid conductor and multi-radius dome ceiling
TW356554B (en) * 1995-10-23 1999-04-21 Watkins Johnson Co Gas injection system for semiconductor processing
DE19606375A1 (en) * 1996-02-21 1997-08-28 Balzers Prozes Systeme Gmbh Microwave plasma source with Whistler or Helicon waves
KR100476039B1 (en) * 1996-03-18 2005-07-11 비오이 하이디스 테크놀로지 주식회사 Inductively Coupled Plasma CVD Equipment
CA2207154A1 (en) * 1996-06-10 1997-12-10 Lam Research Corporation Inductively coupled source for deriving substantially uniform plasma flux
US5993678A (en) * 1996-07-31 1999-11-30 Toyo Technologies Inc. Device and method for processing a plasma to alter the surface of a substrate
US5942855A (en) * 1996-08-28 1999-08-24 Northeastern University Monolithic miniaturized inductively coupled plasma source
US6214162B1 (en) 1996-09-27 2001-04-10 Tokyo Electron Limited Plasma processing apparatus
JP3483725B2 (en) * 1997-04-02 2004-01-06 株式会社日立製作所 Plasma processing apparatus and processing method
US6027988A (en) * 1997-05-28 2000-02-22 The Regents Of The University Of California Method of separating films from bulk substrates by plasma immersion ion implantation
US6373022B2 (en) 1997-06-30 2002-04-16 Applied Materials, Inc. Plasma reactor with antenna of coil conductors of concentric helices offset along the axis of symmetry
US6103599A (en) * 1997-07-25 2000-08-15 Silicon Genesis Corporation Planarizing technique for multilayered substrates
US5982100A (en) * 1997-07-28 1999-11-09 Pars, Inc. Inductively coupled plasma reactor
US6051073A (en) * 1998-02-11 2000-04-18 Silicon Genesis Corporation Perforated shield for plasma immersion ion implantation
US6228176B1 (en) 1998-02-11 2001-05-08 Silicon Genesis Corporation Contoured platen design for plasma immerson ion implantation
US6335293B1 (en) 1998-07-13 2002-01-01 Mattson Technology, Inc. Systems and methods for two-sided etch of a semiconductor substrate
US6213050B1 (en) 1998-12-01 2001-04-10 Silicon Genesis Corporation Enhanced plasma mode and computer system for plasma immersion ion implantation
JP2000235900A (en) * 1999-02-15 2000-08-29 Tokyo Electron Ltd Plasma treatment device
JP3787079B2 (en) 2001-09-11 2006-06-21 株式会社日立製作所 Plasma processing equipment
DE10358505B4 (en) * 2003-12-13 2007-10-11 Roth & Rau Ag Plasma source for generating an inductively coupled plasma
US7464662B2 (en) * 2004-01-28 2008-12-16 Tokyo Electron Limited Compact, distributed inductive element for large scale inductively-coupled plasma sources
JP4657620B2 (en) 2004-04-13 2011-03-23 株式会社日立ハイテクノロジーズ Plasma processing equipment
US8993410B2 (en) 2006-09-08 2015-03-31 Silicon Genesis Corporation Substrate cleaving under controlled stress conditions
CN108271309B (en) * 2016-12-30 2020-05-01 中微半导体设备(上海)股份有限公司 Inductively coupled plasma processing device

Family Cites Families (9)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPS6058794B2 (en) * 1981-06-10 1985-12-21 日本電子株式会社 plasma processing equipment
US4431898A (en) * 1981-09-01 1984-02-14 The Perkin-Elmer Corporation Inductively coupled discharge for plasma etching and resist stripping
FR2538987A1 (en) * 1983-01-05 1984-07-06 Commissariat Energie Atomique ENCLOSURE FOR THE TREATMENT AND PARTICULARLY THE ETCHING OF SUBSTRATES BY THE REACTIVE PLASMA METHOD
US4483737A (en) * 1983-01-31 1984-11-20 University Of Cincinnati Method and apparatus for plasma etching a substrate
JPH0740468B2 (en) * 1984-12-11 1995-05-01 株式会社日立製作所 High frequency plasma generator
EP0203560A1 (en) * 1985-05-31 1986-12-03 Tegal Corporation Plasma trench etch
GB8622820D0 (en) * 1986-09-23 1986-10-29 Nordiko Ltd Electrode assembly & apparatus
GB8629634D0 (en) * 1986-12-11 1987-01-21 Dobson C D Reactive ion & sputter etching
EP0284867A2 (en) * 1987-04-03 1988-10-05 Tegal Corporation Dry etching apparatus using surface magnetic field confinement of plasma

Cited By (20)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US6632324B2 (en) 1995-07-19 2003-10-14 Silicon Genesis Corporation System for the plasma treatment of large area substrates
US6528391B1 (en) 1997-05-12 2003-03-04 Silicon Genesis, Corporation Controlled cleavage process and device for patterned films
US6511899B1 (en) 1997-05-12 2003-01-28 Silicon Genesis Corporation Controlled cleavage process using pressurized fluid
US6245161B1 (en) 1997-05-12 2001-06-12 Silicon Genesis Corporation Economical silicon-on-silicon hybrid wafer assembly
US6159824A (en) 1997-05-12 2000-12-12 Silicon Genesis Corporation Silicon-on-silicon wafer bonding process using a thin film blister-separation method
US6159825A (en) 1997-05-12 2000-12-12 Silicon Genesis Corporation Controlled cleavage thin film separation process using a reusable substrate
US6162705A (en) 1997-05-12 2000-12-19 Silicon Genesis Corporation Controlled cleavage process and resulting device using beta annealing
US6187110B1 (en) 1997-05-12 2001-02-13 Silicon Genesis Corporation Device for patterned films
US6632724B2 (en) 1997-05-12 2003-10-14 Silicon Genesis Corporation Controlled cleaving process
US6155909A (en) 1997-05-12 2000-12-05 Silicon Genesis Corporation Controlled cleavage system using pressurized fluid
US6010579A (en) 1997-05-12 2000-01-04 Silicon Genesis Corporation Reusable substrate for thin film separation
US6290804B1 (en) 1997-05-12 2001-09-18 Silicon Genesis Corporation Controlled cleavage process using patterning
US6284631B1 (en) 1997-05-12 2001-09-04 Silicon Genesis Corporation Method and device for controlled cleaving process
US6294814B1 (en) 1997-05-12 2001-09-25 Silicon Genesis Corporation Cleaved silicon thin film with rough surface
US6048411A (en) 1997-05-12 2000-04-11 Silicon Genesis Corporation Silicon-on-silicon hybrid wafer assembly
US5985742A (en) 1997-05-12 1999-11-16 Silicon Genesis Corporation Controlled cleavage process and device for patterned films
US6558802B1 (en) 1997-05-12 2003-05-06 Silicon Genesis Corporation Silicon-on-silicon hybrid wafer assembly
US6221740B1 (en) 1999-08-10 2001-04-24 Silicon Genesis Corporation Substrate cleaving tool and method
US6263941B1 (en) 1999-08-10 2001-07-24 Silicon Genesis Corporation Nozzle for cleaving substrates
US9362439B2 (en) 2008-05-07 2016-06-07 Silicon Genesis Corporation Layer transfer of films utilizing controlled shear region

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JPH0770532B2 (en) 1995-07-31
EP0379828A3 (en) 1991-01-09
DE68924413T2 (en) 1996-05-02
EP0379828A2 (en) 1990-08-01
JPH02235332A (en) 1990-09-18
DE68924413D1 (en) 1995-11-02

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
EP0379828B1 (en) Radio frequency induction/multipole plasma processing tool
US5304279A (en) Radio frequency induction/multipole plasma processing tool
EP0271341B1 (en) Method and apparatus for ion etching
US6211622B1 (en) Plasma processing equipment
EP0640244B1 (en) Plasma treatment apparatus and method in which a uniform electric field is induced by a dielectric window
EP0510401B1 (en) Processing apparatus using plasma
US5824605A (en) Gas dispersion window for plasma apparatus and method of use thereof
EP0396398B1 (en) Plasma etching apparatus with surface magnetic fields
US6679981B1 (en) Inductive plasma loop enhancing magnetron sputtering
EP0413282B1 (en) Method and apparatus for producing magnetically-coupled planar plasma
JP3381916B2 (en) Low frequency induction type high frequency plasma reactor
US7863582B2 (en) Ion-beam source
EP0054201B1 (en) Dry etching device and method
US5580420A (en) Plasma generating method and apparatus and plasma processing method and apparatus
US6887341B2 (en) Plasma processing apparatus for spatial control of dissociation and ionization
US20140339980A1 (en) Electron beam plasma source with remote radical source
WO2002089173A1 (en) Plasma confinement by use of preferred rf return path
US20010017109A1 (en) Enhanced plasma mode and system for plasma immersion ion implantation
JPH06267903A (en) Plasma device
JPH1074600A (en) Plasma processing equipment
EP0639939B1 (en) Fast atom beam source
KR20070101067A (en) Compound plasma source and method for dissociating gases using the same
US7060931B2 (en) Neutral beam source having electromagnet used for etching semiconductor device
JPS61213377A (en) Method and apparatus for plasma deposition
JP3294839B2 (en) Plasma processing method

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A2

Designated state(s): DE FR GB

PUAL Search report despatched

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009013

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 19901113

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A3

Designated state(s): DE FR GB

17Q First examination report despatched

Effective date: 19931001

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): DE FR GB

REF Corresponds to:

Ref document number: 68924413

Country of ref document: DE

Date of ref document: 19951102

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Payment date: 19951128

Year of fee payment: 7

ET Fr: translation filed
PLBE No opposition filed within time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT

26N No opposition filed
PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Effective date: 19970829

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: ST

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: IF02

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: 746

Effective date: 20081124

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 20081230

Year of fee payment: 20

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Payment date: 20081222

Year of fee payment: 20

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: PE20

Expiry date: 20091218

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF EXPIRATION OF PROTECTION

Effective date: 20091218