EP0516403A2 - Method of remote diagnostics for franking machines - Google Patents

Method of remote diagnostics for franking machines Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP0516403A2
EP0516403A2 EP92304809A EP92304809A EP0516403A2 EP 0516403 A2 EP0516403 A2 EP 0516403A2 EP 92304809 A EP92304809 A EP 92304809A EP 92304809 A EP92304809 A EP 92304809A EP 0516403 A2 EP0516403 A2 EP 0516403A2
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
fault
franking machine
franking
computer
memory
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
EP92304809A
Other languages
German (de)
French (fr)
Other versions
EP0516403A3 (en
EP0516403B1 (en
Inventor
Cyrus Abumehdi
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Neopost Ltd
Original Assignee
Neopost Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Family has litigation
First worldwide family litigation filed litigation Critical https://patents.darts-ip.com/?family=10695714&utm_source=google_patent&utm_medium=platform_link&utm_campaign=public_patent_search&patent=EP0516403(A2) "Global patent litigation dataset” by Darts-ip is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Application filed by Neopost Ltd filed Critical Neopost Ltd
Publication of EP0516403A2 publication Critical patent/EP0516403A2/en
Publication of EP0516403A3 publication Critical patent/EP0516403A3/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP0516403B1 publication Critical patent/EP0516403B1/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Revoked legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G07CHECKING-DEVICES
    • G07BTICKET-ISSUING APPARATUS; FARE-REGISTERING APPARATUS; FRANKING APPARATUS
    • G07B17/00Franking apparatus
    • G07B17/00185Details internally of apparatus in a franking system, e.g. franking machine at customer or apparatus at post office
    • G07B17/00314Communication within apparatus, personal computer [PC] system, or server, e.g. between printhead and central unit in a franking machine
    • GPHYSICS
    • G07CHECKING-DEVICES
    • G07BTICKET-ISSUING APPARATUS; FARE-REGISTERING APPARATUS; FRANKING APPARATUS
    • G07B17/00Franking apparatus
    • G07B17/00016Relations between apparatus, e.g. franking machine at customer or apparatus at post office, in a franking system
    • G07B17/0008Communication details outside or between apparatus
    • GPHYSICS
    • G07CHECKING-DEVICES
    • G07BTICKET-ISSUING APPARATUS; FARE-REGISTERING APPARATUS; FRANKING APPARATUS
    • G07B17/00Franking apparatus
    • G07B17/00185Details internally of apparatus in a franking system, e.g. franking machine at customer or apparatus at post office
    • G07B17/00362Calculation or computing within apparatus, e.g. calculation of postage value
    • GPHYSICS
    • G07CHECKING-DEVICES
    • G07BTICKET-ISSUING APPARATUS; FARE-REGISTERING APPARATUS; FRANKING APPARATUS
    • G07B17/00Franking apparatus
    • G07B17/00185Details internally of apparatus in a franking system, e.g. franking machine at customer or apparatus at post office
    • G07B17/00435Details specific to central, non-customer apparatus, e.g. servers at post office or vendor
    • GPHYSICS
    • G07CHECKING-DEVICES
    • G07BTICKET-ISSUING APPARATUS; FARE-REGISTERING APPARATUS; FRANKING APPARATUS
    • G07B17/00Franking apparatus
    • G07B17/00016Relations between apparatus, e.g. franking machine at customer or apparatus at post office, in a franking system
    • G07B17/0008Communication details outside or between apparatus
    • G07B2017/00088Communication details outside or between apparatus via landlines
    • G07B2017/00096Communication details outside or between apparatus via landlines via phone lines
    • GPHYSICS
    • G07CHECKING-DEVICES
    • G07BTICKET-ISSUING APPARATUS; FARE-REGISTERING APPARATUS; FRANKING APPARATUS
    • G07B17/00Franking apparatus
    • G07B17/00016Relations between apparatus, e.g. franking machine at customer or apparatus at post office, in a franking system
    • G07B17/0008Communication details outside or between apparatus
    • G07B2017/00153Communication details outside or between apparatus for sending information
    • G07B2017/00169Communication details outside or between apparatus for sending information from a franking apparatus, e.g. for verifying accounting
    • GPHYSICS
    • G07CHECKING-DEVICES
    • G07BTICKET-ISSUING APPARATUS; FARE-REGISTERING APPARATUS; FRANKING APPARATUS
    • G07B17/00Franking apparatus
    • G07B17/00185Details internally of apparatus in a franking system, e.g. franking machine at customer or apparatus at post office
    • G07B17/00314Communication within apparatus, personal computer [PC] system, or server, e.g. between printhead and central unit in a franking machine
    • G07B2017/00338Error detection or handling

Definitions

  • This invention relates to remotely diagnosing faults which may occur in franking machines.
  • Franking machines in use in the field may develop faults at indeterminate periods. Some faults may be insignificant and merely prevent use of certain facilities normally provided by the machine or may be intermittent and affect use of the franking machine at indeterminate times. Other more serious faults may occur which result in inhibition of use of the machine for franking of mail items. The latter more serious faults cause significant inconvenience to the user of the machine because the machine is not available for use in franking mail. It is desirable to reduce or prevent the occurrence of faults in machines in order to ensure that generally the machines are always available for use when required. By maintaining a fault history of each machine in the field it is possible from analysis of the fault history of any individual machine to predict and provide an early warning of the possible occurrence of a specific fault. From this predictive information action may be taken to service or modify the franking machine prior to the occurrence of the predicted fault and thereby prevent loss of use of the machine.
  • the invention also envisages apparatus for carrying out the method.
  • a franking machine 101 comprises an electronic microprocessor 11 for carrying out control and accounting functions in the franking machine.
  • a keyboard 12 is provided for input of data by a user of the machine and a display device 13 is provided to enable the microprocessor to display information to assist the user in using the franking machine.
  • a read-only memory (ROM) 14 is provided for the storage of fixed information such as program routines for controlling operation of the microprocessor 11 and a random access memory 15 is provided as a working store for the microprocessor.
  • Non-volatile memories 16, 17 are provided for the storage of accounting data and as is well known in franking machines may include a descending register for storing a value of credit available for use in franking of mail items with postage value, a tote register for storing an accumulated value of postage used in franking mail items, an items register storing a count of the number of items franked and a high items register for storing a count of the number of items franked with a postage value in excess of a predetermined value.
  • a printing device 18 is controlled by the microprocessor to print franking impressions on mail items.
  • franking machines which operate in a pre-payment mode
  • the user of the machine makes a payment to the postal authority and the value of the payment is entered into the descending register of the franking machine to provide an amount of credit available for use in franking mail items with postage value.
  • the read-only memory 14 stores a program routine for controlling the microprocessor in carrying out franking operations.
  • the user of the machine inputs by means of the keyboard 12 a value of postage with which a mail item is to be franked and the microprocessor checks to determine that there is a sufficient value of credit in the descending register for required franking.
  • the microprocessor continues with the program routine to modify the contents of the registers to take account of the franking being effected and to operate the printing device to print a franking impression with the required postage value on the mail item. If there is insufficient credit available the franking routine is terminated and printing of the franking impression is not effected. The franking machine remains incapable of carrying out further franking operations until such time as additional credit has been entered into the descending register.
  • each register is duplicated in each of the non-volatile memory devices 16, 17 so that if one device should fail, the registers in the other device will continue to store the accounting data.
  • the franking machine is provided with an input/output interface 19 communicating with the microprocessor to enable the microprocessor to communicate with apparatus external to the franking machine.
  • the microprocessor 11 and the computer 20 carry out a series of steps in which credit update information is transmitted from the computer to the franking machine and in which the franking machine sends accounting data from its registers to the computer.
  • Security in transmission of the information over open telephone lines is maintained by transmitting a transaction identity code comprising a pseudo-random number in messages between the computer and franking machine and by encrypting the messages.
  • the franking machine 101 is provided with a fault register 22 having a number "n" of storage locations. Upon occurrence of a fault, the microprocessor writes a code representing the type of fault which has occurred into a storage location of the fault register, the codes being written into the storage locations in turn.
  • the register stores a log of the most recent "n" faults which have occurred.
  • the program routine carried out by the franking machine during re-setting of credit includes a sub-routine in which the contents of all the storage locations of the fault register 22 are read out and transmitted to the re-crediting authority computer 20.
  • the storage locations of the fault register are erased so that after read out, the register is ready to receive the code representing the next fault when it occurs. Instead of erasing the storage locations of the fault register, the storage locations may be overwritten in turn in such a manner that when the code for each new fault is written to the register the code for the oldest fault is overwritten. Accordingly the codes stored in the register always represent the most recent "n" faults which have occurred.
  • the re-crediting authority computer is provided with memory 23 and when the computer receives the log of fault codes from a franking machine in the course of re-setting credit in that franking machine, the computer writes the log of fault codes into its the memory 23. It will be appreciated that a large number of franking machines 101 - 10 n are re-credited as and when required by a single central re-crediting computer. Accordingly the log of fault codes is stored in the memory together with information identifying the meter from which the log has been received. Thus over a period of time, the computer 20 will receive and store in memory 23 the fault logs or histories of all those machines 101 - 10 n which have had credit updated during that period.
  • this transmission of fault data occurs automatically each time a franking machine is re-credited and hence as result does not require communication with the franking machine specifically for the purpose of transmitting fault data. Accordingly the user of the machine is not required to carry out any additional operation and the accumulation and transmission of fault data is transparent to the user.
  • the fault log data is transmitted and collected at the computer memory 23 at a periodicity which corresponds to some extent upon the amount of use of each franking machine.
  • the fault register 22 is shown as a separate element however if desired the fault register may be implemented as a register in the non-volatile memories 16, 17 and like the accounting registers in these memories may be duplicated in each of the memories 16 and 17.
  • the service organisation is provided with a computer 24 which is capable of communicating with the re-crediting authority computer 20 and is permitted to have access to the fault log data in memory 23. Periodically the computer 24 accesses the fault log in memory 23 and an analysis of the faults which have occurred on the franking machines is carried out. Such an analysis may predict that a specific franking machine is likely to develop a specific fault and in accordance with that prediction a service engineer visits the site of the franking machine to carry out modification or repair of the machine to prevent occurrence of the predicted fault. The analysis alternatively may predict that a specific batch of machines is prone to one or more specific faults in which event action may be taken to modify all machines in that batch to prevent occurrence of that fault in those machines of the batch which are not yet affected.
  • the transportable modules may be utilised to convey fault log data from the franking machine to the computer 20 instead of utilising the telephone network.
  • the transportable modules may be utilised to convey fault log data from the franking machine to the computer 20 instead of utilising the telephone network.
  • transmission of the fault log data from the franking machine is effected each time the franking machine is re-credited.
  • transmission of the fault log data may be effected as part of another routine which occurs periodically for each machine.
  • franking machines which are operated in a post payment mode do not carry out re-crediting operations.
  • the postal authority require to receive data relating to usage of the machines and for this purpose receive the values stored in the accounting data registers to enable the authority to audit usage of the machines.
  • the transmission of fault log data may be effected as a sub-routine of the main routine for collection of account data.
  • the flow chart of Figure 2 illustrates the steps carried out in each of the franking machines 101 - 10 n , the central re-crediting computer 20 and the service computer 24 to provide fault histories of each machine, to transmit these fault histories to the service computer and to modify or repair the machines in dependence upon analysis of the fault histories.
  • Analysis of the fault log of a specific franking machine may indicate that there is a probability of failure of a component of that machine which would result in the machine becoming inoperable to effect franking of mail items and hence require an on-site visit by a service engineer to effect an early repair or replacement of that component to ensure that the machine continues to operate satisfactorily and remains in service.
  • the analysis of the fault log may indicate a fault history which does not require physical replacement or repair of a component.
  • faults may arise from software program routines or sub-routines particularly under certain conditions of use of the machine in which there is interaction between sub-routines which had not been envisaged when the software was written or installed in the machine.
  • Such faults may also arise due to change in tolerances of electronic components such that they are required by a software routine to operate close to a current tolerance limit.
  • a modification of the software routine may be made which has the effect of operating the component safely within its current tolerance.
  • the software may be modified to overcome any tendency for the detected fault to occur.
  • the service computer 24 may communicate via the telephone network 21 with a selected one of the franking machines 101 - 10 n to enable the modified software code to be transmitted to the franking machines from the service computer via the telephone network.
  • the modified software code may be transmitted to all franking machines of a specified model number in the field or only to those franking machines which, from analysis of their fault histories, indicate a need for modification of the software.
  • Access to the memories in the franking machines which store software code must be restricted to prevent unauthorised modification of the software and accordingly any transmission from the service computer to the franking machines for the purpose of modifying or writing new software routines into the memories of the franking machines includes signals which enable access to the software code memories to be obtained. Such transmissions are carried out in a secure manner to ensure that only authorised transmissions enable access to the software code memories and that only the software code transmitted in an authorised transmission is written to the memories of the franking machines.
  • a method of securely transmitting data over a telephone network for the purpose of re-crediting a franking machine is described in our European patent application 89313220.9 referred to hereinbefore.
  • a similar secure method of transmitting data may be used for transmission of signals to modify operation of the franking machine.
  • re-crediting is effected by means of a transportable memory module as described in our British patent No. 2173738 and referred to hereinbefore
  • modification of software code in a franking machine may be effected by utilising the transportable memory module to carry the modified software code to be written into the memory of the franking machine.
  • Our British patent describes a method of ensuring security of the data carried by the module and such a method may be utilised to ensure security of signals carried by the module to be utilised to modify operation of the franking machine.
  • the modification of software may include re-configuration of variables capable of being set in the franking machine software program routine.
  • the software memories of the franking machine may be loaded with a number of subroutines in manufacture of the franking machine. Some of these sub-routines may be activated upon installation of the franking machine while others of these sub-routines are left in-activated. During use of the franking machine in the field it may be desired to de-activate or activate selected ones of these co-resident sub-routines either to modify the facilities provided by the franking machine or in order to overcome the probability of a fault arising as indicated by the analysis of the fault history of that machine.
  • fault flags are set to indicate the occurrence of the fault. Some faults may arise due to a detected error in data stored in the franking machine.
  • Electronic accounting data is handled by the circuits of the franking machine in a manner such that, except in the event of catastrophic failure, the data can be re-constructed. For example each register which stores accounting data is replicated four times and in each operation of the franking machine involving the accounting data the contents of the four replications of the registers are compared. If the contents are identical continued operation of the franking machine is permitted. However if the contents of three replications of the register are the same but one register is different a fault flag is set to inhibit continued operation of the machine.
  • a sub-routine can be activated to correct the data in that one of the replications which is different from the other three replications and to reset the fault flag.
  • This subroutine may be activated remotely by the service computer using a secure transmission and then the fault flag may be reset remotely by a secure transmission. If the data has been corrected the fault flag can be reset. Other faults may occur which do not involve electronic data. If the fault is transitory or intermittent a transmission to reset the fault flag will be successful in resetting the fault flag. However where a permanent or non-transitory fault exists the reset of the fault flag will fail. Many faults are transitory or intermittent and hence the remote resetting of the fault flag allows the franking machine to be continued to be used until a service repair can be effected.
  • the service computer 24 is shown as communicating with the re-credit computer by means of a dedicated communication link 25. However it is to be understood that the service computer may communicate with the re-credit computer via the telephone network 21.

Abstract

A franking machine system is disclosed in which each franking machine (10₁-10n) includes a fault history memory (22) into which fault codes are written as each fault occurs. Periodically the accumulated fault codes in the memory (22) are read out and transmitted to a remote central fault analysis computer (24) to generate a prediction of faults likely to occur in each franking machine (10₁-10n). Where the franking machines (10₁-10n) periodically communicate with a remote re-setting computer (20) for re-setting credit in the franking machines (10₁-10n), the re-setting computer (20) includes storage means (23) to store the fault histories from each of the franking machines (10₁-10n) and each credit re-setting operation with a franking machine (10₁-10n) includes transmission to the re-setting computer (20) and writing into the storage means (23) thereof of the fault history of that franking machine (10₁-10n). The fault analysis computer (24) periodically communicates with the re-setting computer (20) to receive the fault histories stored therein of the franking machines (10₁-10n).

Description

  • This invention relates to remotely diagnosing faults which may occur in franking machines.
  • Franking machines in use in the field may develop faults at indeterminate periods. Some faults may be insignificant and merely prevent use of certain facilities normally provided by the machine or may be intermittent and affect use of the franking machine at indeterminate times. Other more serious faults may occur which result in inhibition of use of the machine for franking of mail items. The latter more serious faults cause significant inconvenience to the user of the machine because the machine is not available for use in franking mail. It is desirable to reduce or prevent the occurrence of faults in machines in order to ensure that generally the machines are always available for use when required. By maintaining a fault history of each machine in the field it is possible from analysis of the fault history of any individual machine to predict and provide an early warning of the possible occurrence of a specific fault. From this predictive information action may be taken to service or modify the franking machine prior to the occurrence of the predicted fault and thereby prevent loss of use of the machine.
  • According to the invention a method of remotely diagnosing faults which may occur in a franking machine comprises the steps of storing in a memory of the franking machine a fault code identifying a fault in the franking machine upon occurrence of the fault to form a fault history of the franking machine; periodically accessing said memory to read said fault history comprising codes stored in said memory subsequent to a previous access; transmitting said fault history read from the memory to a central computer; and analysing said fault history to provide an indication of impending faults.
  • The invention also envisages apparatus for carrying out the method.
  • The method in accordance with the invention will now be described by way of example with reference to the drawings in which:-
    • Figure 1 is a block diagram illustrating franking machines connected for communication with a remote resetting centre and service centre, and
    • Figure 2 is a flow chart of a sequences of events in remote fault diagnosis and remedial action in respect of a franking machine.
  • Referring first to Figure 1, a franking machine 10₁ comprises an electronic microprocessor 11 for carrying out control and accounting functions in the franking machine. A keyboard 12 is provided for input of data by a user of the machine and a display device 13 is provided to enable the microprocessor to display information to assist the user in using the franking machine. A read-only memory (ROM) 14 is provided for the storage of fixed information such as program routines for controlling operation of the microprocessor 11 and a random access memory 15 is provided as a working store for the microprocessor. Non-volatile memories 16, 17 are provided for the storage of accounting data and as is well known in franking machines may include a descending register for storing a value of credit available for use in franking of mail items with postage value, a tote register for storing an accumulated value of postage used in franking mail items, an items register storing a count of the number of items franked and a high items register for storing a count of the number of items franked with a postage value in excess of a predetermined value. A printing device 18 is controlled by the microprocessor to print franking impressions on mail items. In franking machines which operate in a pre-payment mode, the user of the machine makes a payment to the postal authority and the value of the payment is entered into the descending register of the franking machine to provide an amount of credit available for use in franking mail items with postage value. The read-only memory 14 stores a program routine for controlling the microprocessor in carrying out franking operations. In such franking operations, the user of the machine inputs by means of the keyboard 12 a value of postage with which a mail item is to be franked and the microprocessor checks to determine that there is a sufficient value of credit in the descending register for required franking. If there is sufficient credit the microprocessor continues with the program routine to modify the contents of the registers to take account of the franking being effected and to operate the printing device to print a franking impression with the required postage value on the mail item. If there is insufficient credit available the franking routine is terminated and printing of the franking impression is not effected. The franking machine remains incapable of carrying out further franking operations until such time as additional credit has been entered into the descending register.
  • As is well known in franking machines those operational parts of the machine which maintain accounting records and which effect printing of the franking impression are protected from attempts to fraudulently interfere with the operation thereof. To this end the operational parts of the machine are housed in a secure housing access to which may be made only by authorised personnel of the postal authority or of an authorised service organisation and any external electrical connections to the machine are protected to prevent external application of unauthorised signals in an attempt to use the machine fraudulently. The accounting operations and storing of the accounting records are carried out in a manner to ensure integrity of the accounting data even in the event of the occurrence of faults in the machine. For example, each register is duplicated in each of the non-volatile memory devices 16, 17 so that if one device should fail, the registers in the other device will continue to store the accounting data.
  • The franking machine is provided with an input/output interface 19 communicating with the microprocessor to enable the microprocessor to communicate with apparatus external to the franking machine.
  • Previously, when the credit value in the descending register had fallen to a low value it was necessary for the postage meter of the franking machine to be taken to a resetting authority such as the postal authority to have an increased value of credit entered into the descending register. However current postage meters are constructed to have provision to enable increased credit to be entered remotely without removing the postage meter from the user's premises. A system for re-setting credit in a franking machine remotely by means of a re-crediting computer 20 is described in our european patent application 89313220.9. Communication is established between the microprocessor of the franking machine and a re-crediting authority computer 20 via the interface 19 and a telephone network 21. The microprocessor 11 and the computer 20 carry out a series of steps in which credit update information is transmitted from the computer to the franking machine and in which the franking machine sends accounting data from its registers to the computer. Security in transmission of the information over open telephone lines is maintained by transmitting a transaction identity code comprising a pseudo-random number in messages between the computer and franking machine and by encrypting the messages.
  • During operation of franking machines faults may occur which in themselves do not prevent operation of the machine for franking purposes but which may provide an indication that a more serious fault condition preventing use of the machine has a probability of occurring in the future. Accordingly it is desirable to log faults as they occur in each machine to provide a fault history for each individual franking machine and to analyse these faults to determine if from experience any of the machines in use in the field have a fault history which suggests that they are likely to fail in operation. The franking machine 10₁ is provided with a fault register 22 having a number "n" of storage locations. Upon occurrence of a fault, the microprocessor writes a code representing the type of fault which has occurred into a storage location of the fault register, the codes being written into the storage locations in turn. Thus at any time, the register stores a log of the most recent "n" faults which have occurred. The program routine carried out by the franking machine during re-setting of credit includes a sub-routine in which the contents of all the storage locations of the fault register 22 are read out and transmitted to the re-crediting authority computer 20. The storage locations of the fault register are erased so that after read out, the register is ready to receive the code representing the next fault when it occurs. Instead of erasing the storage locations of the fault register, the storage locations may be overwritten in turn in such a manner that when the code for each new fault is written to the register the code for the oldest fault is overwritten. Accordingly the codes stored in the register always represent the most recent "n" faults which have occurred. The re-crediting authority computer is provided with memory 23 and when the computer receives the log of fault codes from a franking machine in the course of re-setting credit in that franking machine, the computer writes the log of fault codes into its the memory 23. It will be appreciated that a large number of franking machines 10₁ - 10n are re-credited as and when required by a single central re-crediting computer. Accordingly the log of fault codes is stored in the memory together with information identifying the meter from which the log has been received. Thus over a period of time, the computer 20 will receive and store in memory 23 the fault logs or histories of all those machines 10₁ - 10n which have had credit updated during that period. It will be appreciated that this transmission of fault data occurs automatically each time a franking machine is re-credited and hence as result does not require communication with the franking machine specifically for the purpose of transmitting fault data. Accordingly the user of the machine is not required to carry out any additional operation and the accumulation and transmission of fault data is transparent to the user. Furthermore by transmitting the fault log data as part of the re-crediting routine, the data is transmitted and collected at the computer memory 23 at a periodicity which corresponds to some extent upon the amount of use of each franking machine. In Figure 1, the fault register 22 is shown as a separate element however if desired the fault register may be implemented as a register in the non-volatile memories 16, 17 and like the accounting registers in these memories may be duplicated in each of the memories 16 and 17.
  • Servicing and correcting faults in franking machines is carried out by an authorised service organisation. The service organisation is provided with a computer 24 which is capable of communicating with the re-crediting authority computer 20 and is permitted to have access to the fault log data in memory 23. Periodically the computer 24 accesses the fault log in memory 23 and an analysis of the faults which have occurred on the franking machines is carried out. Such an analysis may predict that a specific franking machine is likely to develop a specific fault and in accordance with that prediction a service engineer visits the site of the franking machine to carry out modification or repair of the machine to prevent occurrence of the predicted fault. The analysis alternatively may predict that a specific batch of machines is prone to one or more specific faults in which event action may be taken to modify all machines in that batch to prevent occurrence of that fault in those machines of the batch which are not yet affected.
  • Where the re-crediting of franking machines is carried out by means of transportable memory modules as in the CREDIPAC re-crediting system marketed by Alcatel Business Systems Limited, the transportable modules may be utilised to convey fault log data from the franking machine to the computer 20 instead of utilising the telephone network. For a more detailed description of the operation of re-crediting utilising a transportable memory module reference may be made to the specification of our British patent No. 2173738.
  • As hereinbefore described, transmission of the fault log data from the franking machine is effected each time the franking machine is re-credited. However transmission of the fault log data may be effected as part of another routine which occurs periodically for each machine. For example, franking machines which are operated in a post payment mode do not carry out re-crediting operations. However periodically the postal authority require to receive data relating to usage of the machines and for this purpose receive the values stored in the accounting data registers to enable the authority to audit usage of the machines. Where the data relating to usage of the machines collected remotely by transmission of the data either by means of the telephone network or for example by means of a transportable module the transmission of fault log data may be effected as a sub-routine of the main routine for collection of account data.
  • The flow chart of Figure 2 illustrates the steps carried out in each of the franking machines 10₁ - 10n, the central re-crediting computer 20 and the service computer 24 to provide fault histories of each machine, to transmit these fault histories to the service computer and to modify or repair the machines in dependence upon analysis of the fault histories.
  • Analysis of the fault log of a specific franking machine may indicate that there is a probability of failure of a component of that machine which would result in the machine becoming inoperable to effect franking of mail items and hence require an on-site visit by a service engineer to effect an early repair or replacement of that component to ensure that the machine continues to operate satisfactorily and remains in service. However the analysis of the fault log may indicate a fault history which does not require physical replacement or repair of a component. For example faults may arise from software program routines or sub-routines particularly under certain conditions of use of the machine in which there is interaction between sub-routines which had not been envisaged when the software was written or installed in the machine. Such faults may also arise due to change in tolerances of electronic components such that they are required by a software routine to operate close to a current tolerance limit. A modification of the software routine may be made which has the effect of operating the component safely within its current tolerance. In response to such faults being registered in any of the franking machines, transmitted to the re-credit computer 20, and written to the memory 23 and then being transferred to the service computer for analysis, the software may be modified to overcome any tendency for the detected fault to occur. Instead of installing the modified software by on-site visits of a service engineer, the service computer 24 may communicate via the telephone network 21 with a selected one of the franking machines 10₁ - 10n to enable the modified software code to be transmitted to the franking machines from the service computer via the telephone network. The modified software code may be transmitted to all franking machines of a specified model number in the field or only to those franking machines which, from analysis of their fault histories, indicate a need for modification of the software. Access to the memories in the franking machines which store software code must be restricted to prevent unauthorised modification of the software and accordingly any transmission from the service computer to the franking machines for the purpose of modifying or writing new software routines into the memories of the franking machines includes signals which enable access to the software code memories to be obtained. Such transmissions are carried out in a secure manner to ensure that only authorised transmissions enable access to the software code memories and that only the software code transmitted in an authorised transmission is written to the memories of the franking machines. A method of securely transmitting data over a telephone network for the purpose of re-crediting a franking machine is described in our European patent application 89313220.9 referred to hereinbefore. A similar secure method of transmitting data may be used for transmission of signals to modify operation of the franking machine. Where re-crediting is effected by means of a transportable memory module as described in our British patent No. 2173738 and referred to hereinbefore modification of software code in a franking machine may be effected by utilising the transportable memory module to carry the modified software code to be written into the memory of the franking machine. Our British patent describes a method of ensuring security of the data carried by the module and such a method may be utilised to ensure security of signals carried by the module to be utilised to modify operation of the franking machine.
  • The modification of software may include re-configuration of variables capable of being set in the franking machine software program routine. The software memories of the franking machine may be loaded with a number of subroutines in manufacture of the franking machine. Some of these sub-routines may be activated upon installation of the franking machine while others of these sub-routines are left in-activated. During use of the franking machine in the field it may be desired to de-activate or activate selected ones of these co-resident sub-routines either to modify the facilities provided by the franking machine or in order to overcome the probability of a fault arising as indicated by the analysis of the fault history of that machine.
  • When faults occur in the franking machine, fault flags are set to indicate the occurrence of the fault. Some faults may arise due to a detected error in data stored in the franking machine. Electronic accounting data is handled by the circuits of the franking machine in a manner such that, except in the event of catastrophic failure, the data can be re-constructed. For example each register which stores accounting data is replicated four times and in each operation of the franking machine involving the accounting data the contents of the four replications of the registers are compared. If the contents are identical continued operation of the franking machine is permitted. However if the contents of three replications of the register are the same but one register is different a fault flag is set to inhibit continued operation of the machine. Since the contents of three replications of the register are identical it is clear that these replications contain correct data. Accordingly a sub-routine can be activated to correct the data in that one of the replications which is different from the other three replications and to reset the fault flag. This subroutine may be activated remotely by the service computer using a secure transmission and then the fault flag may be reset remotely by a secure transmission. If the data has been corrected the fault flag can be reset. Other faults may occur which do not involve electronic data. If the fault is transitory or intermittent a transmission to reset the fault flag will be successful in resetting the fault flag. However where a permanent or non-transitory fault exists the reset of the fault flag will fail. Many faults are transitory or intermittent and hence the remote resetting of the fault flag allows the franking machine to be continued to be used until a service repair can be effected.
  • In Figure 1, the service computer 24 is shown as communicating with the re-credit computer by means of a dedicated communication link 25. However it is to be understood that the service computer may communicate with the re-credit computer via the telephone network 21.

Claims (13)

  1. A method of remotely diagnosing faults which may occur in a franking machine characterised by the steps of storing in a memory (22) of the franking machine (10₁) a fault code identifying a fault in the franking machine upon occurrence of the fault to form a fault history of the franking machine; periodically accessing said memory to read said fault history comprising codes stored in said memory subsequent to a previous access; transmitting said fault history read from the memory (22) to a central computer (24); and analysing said fault history to provide an indication of impending faults.
  2. A method of remotely diagnosing faults as claimed in claim 1 further characterised in that the franking machine (10₁) is in communication from time to time with a central re-crediting computer (20) for updating of credit stored in the franking machine and in that said memory (22) in the franking machine is accessed and the fault history stored therein is transmitted to the central re-crediting computer (20) each time the franking machine is in communication with the central re-crediting computer for re-setting of the credit stored in the franking machine.
  3. A method as claimed in claim 2 further characterised by the step of storing at the central re-crediting computer (20) the fault history received from each of a plurality of franking machines (10₁-10n) as the respective franking machines are re-credited by the re-crediting computer (20).
  4. A method as claimed in claim 3 including the step of periodically accessing the fault histories stored by the central re-crediting computer (20) and transmitting said fault histories to a fault analysis computer (24).
  5. A method as claimed in any preceding claim further characterised in that the fault history is transmitted from the franking machine (10₁-10n) to the central computer (24) via an input/output interface (19) of the franking machine and a telephone network (21).
  6. A method as claimed in any one of claims 1 to 4 further characterised in that the fault history is transmitted from the franking machine to the central computer (24) by writing said fault history into a transportable memory module; connecting said module to the central computer (20) and reading the fault history from the module to the computer.
  7. A method as claimed in any preceding claim further characterised by means (24) responsive to the fault history received by the central computer and operable to communicate with at least one selected franking machine (10₁-10n) to effect modification of operation of that franking machine.
  8. A method as claimed in claim 7 further characterised in that the means (24) responsive to the fault history is operable in response to the fault history to transmit a signal to the selected franking machine effective to modify a program routine or sub-routine in said franking machine.
  9. A method as claimed in claim 8 further characterised in that the modification of the program routine comprises activating or de-activating program sub-routines which are co-resident in the selected franking machine.
  10. A method as claimed in claim 7 or 8 wherein the means (24) responsive to the fault history is operable to transmit a reset signal to the selected franking machine effective to reset a fault flag in said franking machine.
  11. A method as claimed in any one of claims 7 to 10 further characterised in that the transmission of signals to modify operation of a selected franking machine is effected in a secure manner.
  12. A franking machine system characterised by a franking machine (10₁) including a fault history memory (22); means (11) operative upon occurrence of a fault in said franking machine to write into said memory (22) a fault code representing said fault to form in said memory a fault history comprising a series of fault codes representing respectively a series of occurred faults;
    a central computer (24) remote from said franking machine; communication means (21) for transmitting data between said franking machine and said central computer;
    means (11) operative periodically to read said fault history comprising the series of fault codes from said memory (22) and to transmit said fault history via said communication means (21) to said central computer (24); and
    said central computer (24) being operative in response to said fault history to analyse said fault history and generate an indication of impending faults of said franking machine (10₁).
  13. A franking machine system characterised by a central re-crediting computer (20) including fault storage means (23); a plurality of franking machines (10₁-10n) ; each said franking machine including accounting registers (16, 17) for storing accounting data; a fault history memory (22); means (11) operative upon occurrence of a fault in said franking machine to write into said memory (22) a fault code representing the fault which has occurred so that the memory (22) stores a fault history comprising a series of faults codes representing a series of occurred faults; communication means (21) operable to transmit data between said central computer (20) and each of said franking machines;
    means operable to exchange data between the central computer (20) and a selected one of said franking machines (10₁-10n), said data including re-crediting data effective to re-credit said accounting registers (16, 17) of said selected franking machine and to read out from said fault history memory (22) of said selected franking machine said fault history stored therein and to transmit said fault history to said central computer (20) for storage in said fault storage means (23); and
    a fault analysis computer (24) operable periodically to communicate with said re-setting computer (20) to read out fault histories stored in said fault storage means (23) relating to franking machines of said plurality and to analyse said fault histories and to generate for each franking machine an indication of impending faults.
EP19920304809 1991-05-29 1992-05-28 Method of remote diagnostics for franking machines Revoked EP0516403B1 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
GB9111490 1991-05-29
GB9111490A GB2256396B (en) 1991-05-29 1991-05-29 Method of remote diagnostics for franking machines

Publications (3)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP0516403A2 true EP0516403A2 (en) 1992-12-02
EP0516403A3 EP0516403A3 (en) 1993-10-13
EP0516403B1 EP0516403B1 (en) 1997-08-13

Family

ID=10695714

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP19920304809 Revoked EP0516403B1 (en) 1991-05-29 1992-05-28 Method of remote diagnostics for franking machines

Country Status (3)

Country Link
EP (1) EP0516403B1 (en)
DE (1) DE69221538T2 (en)
GB (1) GB2256396B (en)

Cited By (16)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
NL9402178A (en) * 1994-07-12 1996-01-02 Hadewe Bv Mail-processing system with central parameter storage
NL9401155A (en) * 1994-07-12 1996-02-01 Hadewe Bv Mail processing system with diagnostic facilities.
EP0717379A2 (en) 1994-12-15 1996-06-19 Francotyp-Postalia GmbH Method for improving the security from franking machines at a credit transfer
EP0718798A2 (en) * 1994-12-22 1996-06-26 Neopost Limited Franking machine and franking machine system
US5671146A (en) * 1993-12-21 1997-09-23 Francotyp-Postalia Gmbh Method for improving the security of postage meter machines
EP0825564A2 (en) * 1996-08-23 1998-02-25 Pitney Bowes Inc. Process and apparatus for remote system inspection of a value dispensing mechanism such as a postage meter
EP0840919A1 (en) * 1996-04-23 1998-05-13 Ascom Hasler Mailing Systems, Inc. System for providing early warning preemptive postal equipment replacement
EP0716398A3 (en) * 1994-12-07 1998-07-08 Francotyp-Postalia Aktiengesellschaft & Co. Interface circuit for franking machine and method for manipulation-proof print data control
US5805711A (en) * 1993-12-21 1998-09-08 Francotyp-Postalia Ag & Co. Method of improving the security of postage meter machines
EP0939384A2 (en) * 1998-02-27 1999-09-01 Pitney Bowes Inc. Postage printing system having secure reporting of printer errors
EP0992947A3 (en) * 1998-10-09 2000-12-13 Francotyp-Postalia Aktiengesellschaft & Co. Apparatus and method for the storing of data concerning the usage of an end-user device
EP1001383A3 (en) * 1998-10-09 2000-12-13 Francotyp-Postalia Aktiengesellschaft & Co. Apparatus and method for the storage of data concerning the usage of a terminal
EP0892368A3 (en) * 1997-07-14 2000-12-13 Francotyp-Postalia AG & Co. Method for downloading statistical data and for the classification in statistical sets at the loading of a batch of data
US6435410B2 (en) 1997-12-31 2002-08-20 Neopost B.V. System and method for registration of documents by marking and registration of markings
EP1244064A1 (en) * 2001-03-21 2002-09-25 Francotyp-Postalia AG & Co. KG Franking machine with a data transmission apparatus
US6842742B1 (en) 1996-04-23 2005-01-11 Ascom Hasler Mailing Systems, Inc. System for providing early warning preemptive postal equipment replacement

Citations (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP0019515A2 (en) * 1979-05-09 1980-11-26 Friden Mailing Equipment Corporation Electronic postage meter having improved security and fault tolerance features
GB2066735A (en) * 1977-10-28 1981-07-15 Pitney Bowes Inc Electronic postal meter
EP0172573A2 (en) * 1984-08-22 1986-02-26 Pitney Bowes Inc. Electronic postage meter having multiple non-volatile memories for storing different historical information reflecting postage transactions
GB2178880A (en) * 1985-08-06 1987-02-18 Pitney Bowes Inc Remote postage meter inspection system
GB2188875A (en) * 1986-04-10 1987-10-14 Pitney Bowes Inc Postage meter recharging system
GB2188874A (en) * 1986-04-10 1987-10-14 Pitney Bowes Inc Postage meter recharging system
EP0376573A2 (en) * 1988-12-30 1990-07-04 Neopost Limited Franking system

Family Cites Families (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4870644A (en) * 1982-09-21 1989-09-26 Xerox Corporation Control crash diagnostic strategy and RAM display

Patent Citations (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
GB2066735A (en) * 1977-10-28 1981-07-15 Pitney Bowes Inc Electronic postal meter
EP0019515A2 (en) * 1979-05-09 1980-11-26 Friden Mailing Equipment Corporation Electronic postage meter having improved security and fault tolerance features
EP0172573A2 (en) * 1984-08-22 1986-02-26 Pitney Bowes Inc. Electronic postage meter having multiple non-volatile memories for storing different historical information reflecting postage transactions
GB2178880A (en) * 1985-08-06 1987-02-18 Pitney Bowes Inc Remote postage meter inspection system
GB2188875A (en) * 1986-04-10 1987-10-14 Pitney Bowes Inc Postage meter recharging system
GB2188874A (en) * 1986-04-10 1987-10-14 Pitney Bowes Inc Postage meter recharging system
EP0376573A2 (en) * 1988-12-30 1990-07-04 Neopost Limited Franking system

Cited By (27)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5805711A (en) * 1993-12-21 1998-09-08 Francotyp-Postalia Ag & Co. Method of improving the security of postage meter machines
EP0969421A2 (en) 1993-12-21 2000-01-05 Francotyp-Postalia Aktiengesellschaft & Co. Method for improving the security of franking machines
US5671146A (en) * 1993-12-21 1997-09-23 Francotyp-Postalia Gmbh Method for improving the security of postage meter machines
NL9401155A (en) * 1994-07-12 1996-02-01 Hadewe Bv Mail processing system with diagnostic facilities.
EP0697259A1 (en) * 1994-07-12 1996-02-21 Hadewe B.V. Mail processing system with diagnostic facilities
US5984507A (en) * 1994-07-12 1999-11-16 Hadewe B. V. Mail processing system with diagnostic facilities
NL9402178A (en) * 1994-07-12 1996-01-02 Hadewe Bv Mail-processing system with central parameter storage
EP0716398A3 (en) * 1994-12-07 1998-07-08 Francotyp-Postalia Aktiengesellschaft & Co. Interface circuit for franking machine and method for manipulation-proof print data control
EP1154382A3 (en) * 1994-12-07 2002-02-06 Francotyp-Postalia AG & Co. KG Method for manipulation-proof control of print data and internal interface circuit for franking machines
EP0717379A2 (en) 1994-12-15 1996-06-19 Francotyp-Postalia GmbH Method for improving the security from franking machines at a credit transfer
EP0718798A3 (en) * 1994-12-22 1999-09-08 Neopost Limited Franking machine and franking machine system
EP0718798A2 (en) * 1994-12-22 1996-06-26 Neopost Limited Franking machine and franking machine system
EP0840919A4 (en) * 1996-04-23 2001-04-25 Ascom Hasler Mailing Sys Inc System for providing early warning preemptive postal equipment replacement
EP0840919A1 (en) * 1996-04-23 1998-05-13 Ascom Hasler Mailing Systems, Inc. System for providing early warning preemptive postal equipment replacement
US6842742B1 (en) 1996-04-23 2005-01-11 Ascom Hasler Mailing Systems, Inc. System for providing early warning preemptive postal equipment replacement
US6098032A (en) * 1996-04-23 2000-08-01 Ascom Hasler Mailing Systems, Inc. System for providing early warning preemptive postal equipment replacement
EP0825564A2 (en) * 1996-08-23 1998-02-25 Pitney Bowes Inc. Process and apparatus for remote system inspection of a value dispensing mechanism such as a postage meter
EP0825564A3 (en) * 1996-08-23 2000-05-17 Pitney Bowes Inc. Process and apparatus for remote system inspection of a value dispensing mechanism such as a postage meter
EP0892368A3 (en) * 1997-07-14 2000-12-13 Francotyp-Postalia AG & Co. Method for downloading statistical data and for the classification in statistical sets at the loading of a batch of data
US6435410B2 (en) 1997-12-31 2002-08-20 Neopost B.V. System and method for registration of documents by marking and registration of markings
US6991152B2 (en) 1997-12-31 2006-01-31 Neopost B.V. Opening and franking of postal items
EP0939384A3 (en) * 1998-02-27 2000-10-11 Pitney Bowes Inc. Postage printing system having secure reporting of printer errors
EP0939384A2 (en) * 1998-02-27 1999-09-01 Pitney Bowes Inc. Postage printing system having secure reporting of printer errors
EP0992947A3 (en) * 1998-10-09 2000-12-13 Francotyp-Postalia Aktiengesellschaft & Co. Apparatus and method for the storing of data concerning the usage of an end-user device
EP1001383A3 (en) * 1998-10-09 2000-12-13 Francotyp-Postalia Aktiengesellschaft & Co. Apparatus and method for the storage of data concerning the usage of a terminal
US6820066B1 (en) 1998-10-09 2004-11-16 Francotyp-Postalia Ag & Co. Kg Arrangement and method for storing data relating to the usage of a terminal device
EP1244064A1 (en) * 2001-03-21 2002-09-25 Francotyp-Postalia AG & Co. KG Franking machine with a data transmission apparatus

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
GB2256396B (en) 1995-03-29
DE69221538T2 (en) 1997-12-18
DE69221538D1 (en) 1997-09-18
GB9111490D0 (en) 1991-07-17
EP0516403A3 (en) 1993-10-13
EP0516403B1 (en) 1997-08-13
GB2256396A (en) 1992-12-09

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
EP0516403B1 (en) Method of remote diagnostics for franking machines
US4780601A (en) Control system for franking machines
US5771348A (en) Method and arrangement for enhancing the security of critical data against manipulation
US5822738A (en) Method and apparatus for a modular postage accounting system
US5671146A (en) Method for improving the security of postage meter machines
CA1180120A (en) Electronic postage meter with weak memory indication
GB1561482A (en) Protection of data processing system against unauthorised programmes
US6523013B2 (en) Method and apparatus for performing automated fraud reporting
EP0513880B1 (en) Microprocessor systems for electronic postage arrangements
US4837714A (en) Methods and apparatus for customizing and testing fully assembled postage meters
US6098032A (en) System for providing early warning preemptive postal equipment replacement
EP0099571A2 (en) Housing for electronic device such as a postage meter
US5799093A (en) Process and apparatus for remote system inspection of a value dispensing mechanism such as a postage meter
US6766308B2 (en) Method and apparatus for placing automated calls for postage meter and base
US7305710B2 (en) Method for securely loading and executing software in a secure device that cannot retain software after a loss of power
US6842742B1 (en) System for providing early warning preemptive postal equipment replacement
US7769700B1 (en) Method and apparatus for transferring post meter data
EP0716397B1 (en) A system for recording the initialization and re-initialization of an electronic postage meter
EP0848353B1 (en) Method and apparatus for automatically disabling a removable, portable vault of a postage metering system
EP0356052A2 (en) Franking machine
EP0493943B1 (en) Postage meter monitoring and control
WO1994011848A1 (en) System with removable containers for cash and device for calculating the content of said containers
CA2225000C (en) System for providing early warning preemptive postal equipment replacement

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A2

Designated state(s): CH DE FR GB LI

PUAL Search report despatched

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009013

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A3

Designated state(s): CH DE FR GB LI

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 19940318

17Q First examination report despatched

Effective date: 19950822

GRAG Despatch of communication of intention to grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS AGRA

GRAH Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS IGRA

GRAH Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS IGRA

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): CH DE FR GB LI

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: NV

Representative=s name: HEPP, WENGER & RYFFEL AG

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: EP

REF Corresponds to:

Ref document number: 69221538

Country of ref document: DE

Date of ref document: 19970918

ET Fr: translation filed
PLBQ Unpublished change to opponent data

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS OPPO

PLBI Opposition filed

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009260

26 Opposition filed

Opponent name: PITNEY BOWES INC. WORLD HEADQUARTERS,

Effective date: 19980513

PLBF Reply of patent proprietor to notice(s) of opposition

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS OBSO

PLBF Reply of patent proprietor to notice(s) of opposition

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS OBSO

PLBF Reply of patent proprietor to notice(s) of opposition

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS OBSO

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: IF02

PLAW Interlocutory decision in opposition

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS IDOP

APAC Appeal dossier modified

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS NOAPO

APAC Appeal dossier modified

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS NOAPO

APAC Appeal dossier modified

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS NOAPO

APBP Date of receipt of notice of appeal recorded

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNNOA2O

APBQ Date of receipt of statement of grounds of appeal recorded

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNNOA3O

APAA Appeal reference recorded

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS REFN

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Payment date: 20050519

Year of fee payment: 14

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 20050519

Year of fee payment: 14

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CH

Payment date: 20050523

Year of fee payment: 14

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Payment date: 20050524

Year of fee payment: 14

APBU Appeal procedure closed

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNNOA9O

RDAF Communication despatched that patent is revoked

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNREV1

RDAG Patent revoked

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009271

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: PATENT REVOKED

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: PL

27W Patent revoked

Effective date: 20050814

APAH Appeal reference modified

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSCREFNO

GBPR Gb: patent revoked under art. 102 of the ep convention designating the uk as contracting state

Free format text: 20050814