EP1769624A1 - Enforcement of permitted cell phone usage - Google Patents

Enforcement of permitted cell phone usage

Info

Publication number
EP1769624A1
EP1769624A1 EP04757113A EP04757113A EP1769624A1 EP 1769624 A1 EP1769624 A1 EP 1769624A1 EP 04757113 A EP04757113 A EP 04757113A EP 04757113 A EP04757113 A EP 04757113A EP 1769624 A1 EP1769624 A1 EP 1769624A1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
wireless device
rule
rules
usage rules
usage
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Withdrawn
Application number
EP04757113A
Other languages
German (de)
French (fr)
Other versions
EP1769624A4 (en
Inventor
Kournos Azimi
John Michejda
H. Scott Fetterman
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Agere Systems LLC
Original Assignee
Agere Systems LLC
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Agere Systems LLC filed Critical Agere Systems LLC
Publication of EP1769624A1 publication Critical patent/EP1769624A1/en
Publication of EP1769624A4 publication Critical patent/EP1769624A4/en
Withdrawn legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • H—ELECTRICITY
    • H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04W—WIRELESS COMMUNICATION NETWORKS
    • H04W48/00—Access restriction; Network selection; Access point selection
    • H04W48/02—Access restriction performed under specific conditions
    • H04W48/04—Access restriction performed under specific conditions based on user or terminal location or mobility data, e.g. moving direction, speed
    • H—ELECTRICITY
    • H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04W—WIRELESS COMMUNICATION NETWORKS
    • H04W4/00—Services specially adapted for wireless communication networks; Facilities therefor
    • H04W4/02—Services making use of location information
    • H04W4/029—Location-based management or tracking services
    • H—ELECTRICITY
    • H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L67/00—Network arrangements or protocols for supporting network services or applications
    • H04L67/01—Protocols
    • H04L67/04—Protocols specially adapted for terminals or networks with limited capabilities; specially adapted for terminal portability
    • H—ELECTRICITY
    • H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L67/00—Network arrangements or protocols for supporting network services or applications
    • H04L67/34—Network arrangements or protocols for supporting network services or applications involving the movement of software or configuration parameters 
    • H—ELECTRICITY
    • H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L67/00—Network arrangements or protocols for supporting network services or applications
    • H04L67/50—Network services
    • H04L67/52—Network services specially adapted for the location of the user terminal
    • H—ELECTRICITY
    • H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04M—TELEPHONIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04M1/00—Substation equipment, e.g. for use by subscribers
    • H04M1/72—Mobile telephones; Cordless telephones, i.e. devices for establishing wireless links to base stations without route selection
    • H04M1/724—User interfaces specially adapted for cordless or mobile telephones
    • H04M1/72448—User interfaces specially adapted for cordless or mobile telephones with means for adapting the functionality of the device according to specific conditions
    • H04M1/72463—User interfaces specially adapted for cordless or mobile telephones with means for adapting the functionality of the device according to specific conditions to restrict the functionality of the device
    • H—ELECTRICITY
    • H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04W—WIRELESS COMMUNICATION NETWORKS
    • H04W4/00—Services specially adapted for wireless communication networks; Facilities therefor
    • H04W4/02—Services making use of location information
    • H—ELECTRICITY
    • H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04M—TELEPHONIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04M2250/00—Details of telephonic subscriber devices
    • H04M2250/02—Details of telephonic subscriber devices including a Bluetooth interface
    • H—ELECTRICITY
    • H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04W—WIRELESS COMMUNICATION NETWORKS
    • H04W84/00—Network topologies
    • H04W84/02—Hierarchically pre-organised networks, e.g. paging networks, cellular networks, WLAN [Wireless Local Area Network] or WLL [Wireless Local Loop]
    • H04W84/10—Small scale networks; Flat hierarchical networks
    • H04W84/12—WLAN [Wireless Local Area Networks]
    • H—ELECTRICITY
    • H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04W—WIRELESS COMMUNICATION NETWORKS
    • H04W84/00—Network topologies
    • H04W84/18—Self-organising networks, e.g. ad-hoc networks or sensor networks
    • H04W84/20—Master-slave selection or change arrangements
    • Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y02—TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
    • Y02D—CLIMATE CHANGE MITIGATION TECHNOLOGIES IN INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGIES [ICT], I.E. INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGIES AIMING AT THE REDUCTION OF THEIR OWN ENERGY USE
    • Y02D30/00—Reducing energy consumption in communication networks
    • Y02D30/70—Reducing energy consumption in communication networks in wireless communication networks

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to the use of cell phones and/or other BLUETOOTHTM enabled devices within establishments, vehicles and locations that have rules about the use of such devices.
  • a communications protocol for enforcing usage rules of a wireless device comprises establishing at least one rule relating to an action to be forcibly applied to a wireless device. At least one rule is wirelessly transmitted to the wireless device when the wireless device enters a physical area to which the usage rule applies. The at least one rule relates to an operational parameter of the wireless device without allowing a user of the wireless device to override the at least one rule.
  • a method of implementing a mandatory usage rule for operation of a wireless device in accordance with another aspect of the present invention comprises establishing a wireless link to receive at least one rule relating to operation of at least one feature of the wireless device when the wireless device enters a physical area to which the usage rule applies.
  • An instruction contained by the at least one rule in the wireless device is automatically implemented.
  • the at least one rule relates to an operational parameter of the wireless device without allowing a user of the wireless device to override the at least one rule.
  • Fig. 1 shows a number of BLUETOOTHTM enabled devices such as a cell phones, personal digital assistant (PDA), pager, and email device such as a BLACKBERRYTM or SMARTPHONETM device, automatically controlled into enacting one or more rules provided by a Rules Enforcer Transceiver, in accordance with the principles of the present invention.
  • Fig. 2A exemplifies a table of rules that may be maintained in the rules enforcer transceiver, in accordance with the principles of the present invention.
  • Fig. 2B shows that any one type device may have multiple rules applied, and those rules may be simple, or may be detailed and complex, in accordance with the principles of the present invention.
  • Fig. 3 shows relevant portions of a BLUETOOTHTM enabled phone and a Rules Enforcer Transceiver, shown in Fig. 1.
  • Fig. 4 shows an exemplary flow diagram of a Rules Enforcer Transceiver providing rules information to a BLUETOOTHTM enabled device such as a phone, PDA, etc., in accordance with the principles of the present invention.
  • Fig. 5 shows an exemplary flow diagram of a BLUETOOTHTM enabled device having a mode forcibly changed due to reception of an appropriate rule from a Rules Enforcer Transceiver, in accordance with the principles of the present invention.
  • Fig. 6 shows an exemplary flow diagram of a BLUETOOTHTM enabled device being forcibly powered down due to reception of an appropriate rule from a Rules Enforcer Transceiver, in accordance with the principles of the present invention.
  • the present invention incorporates a set of usage rules that operates in conjunction with hardware which disables particular features of a wireless device (e.g., audible ringing, use of camera, etc.), or which forcibly powers down or otherwise disables an electronic device, based upon the presence of the electronic device in an area with restricted use rules.
  • a wireless device e.g., cell phone
  • a wireless device e.g., cell phone
  • “Rules Enabled” cell phone or other wireless device may be safely taken into sensitive areas such as hospitals, movie theatres, etc. In locations where audible ringing is an annoyance, the cell phone configuration will be automatically affected. For instance, audible ringing may be disabled (or, alternatively, silent ringing such as vibration may be forcibly enabled.) Similarly, camera functionality may be disabled when entering given establishments that prohibit use of such devices, e.g., health clubs, spas, or corporate offices to prevent industrial espionage, etc.
  • Fig. 1 shows a number of BLUETOOTHTM enabled devices such as a cell phones, personal digital assistant (PDA), pager, and email device such as a BLACKBERRYTM or SMARTPHONETM device, automatically controlled into enacting one or more rules provided by a Rules Enforcer Transceiver, in accordance with the principles of the present invention.
  • various wireless devices in particularly piconet devices conforming to a BLUETOOTHTM standard, enter a premises 111 (e.g., a hospital, airplane, etc.), and establish communications with a rules enforcer transceiver 150.
  • an appropriate transmitted device referred to herein as a 'rules transmitter' or 'rules enforcer transceiver' 150, is placed near entrances and/or exits and throughout a given establishment to be protected by such rules. This allows and dis-allows relevant handset features of the cell phone based on the particular site and location within a site, and on a user specific basis.
  • Such 'rules' transmitter 150 may be based on RF, BLUETOOTHTM, infrared, etc. technologies depending upon the region to cover.
  • the relevant wireless devices are equipped with an appropriate matching receiver also based on RF, BLUETOOTHTM, infrared, etc. technologies.
  • the rules enforcer transceiver 150 acts as a master, and each of the wireless communications devices 100a-100d establish a piconet network virtual link with the rules enforcer transceiver
  • Fig. 2A exemplifies a table of rules 207 that may be maintained in the rules enforcer transceiver 150, in accordance with the principles of the present invention. While the particular table used may take any form and/or contain any rules, such rules are restrictive to the devices to which they are associated.
  • a rule to "power down” may be associated with cell phones that come into the network including the rules enforcer transceiver 150, as shown by the first entry in the table 207.
  • PDAs personal digital assistants
  • devices which are already powered down need not have a rule received and/or applied. All devices of a type may be affected, or qualifications may be applied. For instance, all cell phones may be instructed to power down with a single rule. Alternatively, only cell phones including a camera may be instructed to power down, while cell phones without a camera may be permitted to continue operating, i.e., have no rule applied to them.
  • pagers In a third entry of table 207, pagers have a rule which forcibly causes them to enter a silent mode (e.g., no audible beeping, just vibration).
  • a silent mode e.g., no audible beeping, just vibration.
  • 'other devices' i.e., devices which are not otherwise represented in the table 207, are instructed to power down.
  • qualifications may be applied to any/all devices. For instance, devices which carry identifications associated with state or government officials (e.g., police, military, fire department, etc.) may also receive a rule that cancels any other rule. Thus, it is possible that some rules may trump other rules.
  • state or government officials e.g., police, military, fire department, etc.
  • Fig. 2B shows that any one type device may have multiple rules applied, and those rules may be simple, or may be detailed and complex. Multiple rules are preferably compiled by the rules enforcer transceiver 150 before transmission to the wireless devices 100a-100d, but may be transmitted individually and assimilated by the individual wireless devices 100a-100d.
  • time and/or date information may be included with any particular rule.
  • time and/or date restrictive rules may be applied to any of the rules.
  • cell phone usage may be restricted only during evening hours, in which case a power down rule may be communicated from the rules enforcer transceiver 150 to the BLUETOOTHTM enabled phone 100a only during evening hours.
  • Rules from the rules enforcer transceiver 150 are mandatory to the relevant wireless phones 100a-100d, and thus can be considered to 'forcibly' cause the desired action, be it power down, change of mode, disablement of a particular feature, etc.
  • Fig. 3 shows relevant portions of a BLUETOOTHTM enabled phone and a Rules Enforcer Transceiver, shown in Fig. 1.
  • a rules enforcer 150 includes a wireless transceiver to establish a link with the relevant wireless device, e.g., BLUETOOTHTM RF transceiver 254.
  • An information exchange module 252 obtains relevant rules from a rules database 256, and communicates the same via the appropriate protocol (e.g., BLUETOOTHTM) to the relevant wireless device.
  • the receiving wireless device e.g. a BLUETOOTHTM enabled phone 100a includes a wireless transceiver 206, a matching information exchange module 204, and an application or module 208 that implements the particular rule that had been received. For instance, if instructed to enter a silent mode, a forced silent mode initiation module 208 may be activated by the information exchange module 204 to disable any audible ringing, etc., and to enable silent operation using devices such as a vibrator 209.
  • the rules receiver receives the site and user specific rules, then appropriately disables certain features of the wireless device (e.g., disables audible ringing, disables use of the camera, etc.)
  • the particular rule or set of usage 'rules' for the various features of an affected BLUETOOTHTM enabled device e.g., a BLUETOOTHTM capable cell phone
  • Fig. 4 shows an exemplary flow diagram of a Rules Enforcer
  • Transceiver providing rules information to a BLUETOOTHTM enabled device such as a phone, PDA, etc., in accordance with the principles of the present invention.
  • a user of a wireless device enters a premises, location, airplane, etc. that is covered within the range of a rules enforcer transceiver 150.
  • a link is established between the wireless device and the rules enforcer transceiver 150, a BLUETOOTHTM piconet in the given example but not limited to BluetoothTM.
  • step 406 device information is optionally exchanged with the rules enforcer transceiver such that the device type can be determined (e.g., whether the wireless device is a cell phone, PDA, pager, Smartphone, etc.)
  • the rules enforcer transceiver 150 obtains the relevant rules to the type device, preferably combines the same into consistent rules, and then transmits the rule(s) to the wireless device.
  • step 409 having received one or more rules from the rules enforcer transceiver 150, the instructions of the received rules are automatically, forcibly carried out, whether or not the user of the wireless device agrees.
  • Fig. 5 shows an exemplary flow diagram of a
  • BLUETOOTHTM enabled device having a mode forcibly changed due to reception of an appropriate rule from a Rules Enforcer Transceiver, in accordance with the principles of the present invention.
  • one or more rules is received from the rules enforcer transceiver 150.
  • the receiving wireless device 100 upon receipt of the rule(s), automatically initiates the requested action. While the wireless device 100 may warn of the impending action using, e.g., a display, the user of the wireless device is preferably not allowed to override the particular action, perhaps with the exception of allowing the user to manually power down the wireless device.
  • the presence of a 'rules' signal and a base station causes the handset to operate based on the given site specific rules.
  • the wireless handset e.g., cell phone
  • a repeated transmission of the rules from the rules enforcer transceiver 150 may allow affected wireless devices to automatically recover from the forcible action after a given time out.
  • a rule timeout timer may be set.
  • step 508 the timer is monitored to determine if the rule timeout timer has expired.
  • step 510 the wireless device looks for retransmission of the relevant rule. If no retransmission is available, then the wireless device may be allowed to re-enter unrestricted use within the premises.
  • Fig. 6 shows an exemplary flow diagram of a BLUETOOTHTM enabled device being forcibly powered down due to reception of an appropriate rule from a Rules Enforcer Transceiver, in accordance with the principles of the present invention.
  • a rule is received from the rules enforcer transceiver 150.
  • a power down is automatically (i.e., forcibly) initiated in the relevant wireless device, e.g., in a BLUETOOTHTM enabled device.
  • a BLUETOOTHTM enabled device e.g., a BLUETOOTHTM enabled device.
  • BLUETOOTHTM piconet protocol is described, other short range wireless protocols may be used as the rules transmission mechanism, e.g., ZIGBEETM.

Abstract

A set of usage rules are implemented to disable particular features of a wireless device (e.g., audible ringing, use of camera, etc.), or to forcibly power down the device, based upon its presence in an area (111) with restricted usage rules. A number of BLUETOOTHTM enabled or other suitably enabled devices (100a-100d) such as a cell phone, personal digital assistant (PDA), pager, and email device such as a BLACKBERRYTM or SMARTPHONETM device (100a-100d), may be automatically instructed to enact one or more rules provided by a Rules Enforcer Tranceiver (150). A “Rules Enabled” cell phone (100a-100d) or other wireless device (100a-100d) thus may be taken into sensitive areas such as hospitals, movie theaters (111), etc. For instance, audible ringing may be disabled (or, alternatively, silent ringing such as vibration may be forcibly enabled). Similarly, camera functionality may be disabled when entering given establishments (111) that prohibit use of such devices (100a-100b), e.g., health clubs, spas, or corporate offices to prevent industrial espionage, etc.

Description

ENFORCEMENT OF PERMITTED CELL PHONE USAGE
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION 1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates to the use of cell phones and/or other BLUETOOTH™ enabled devices within establishments, vehicles and locations that have rules about the use of such devices.
2. Background of Related Art
No one can dispute the usefulness and convenience of wireless telephones (i.e., cell phones). They have become an everyday convenience for many people, and are often carried around with a person as they move about throughout the day. With the proliferation of cellular telephones, especially cell phone models which incorporate cameras, there are growing concerns about appropriate usage. For instance, cameras raise an issue about invasion of privacy due to indiscrete use of the camera to take pictures in inappropriate places. Other concerns relate to public annoyances caused by cell phones ringing. Besides social issues, safety issues have been raised by the use of cell phones in certain limited circumstances, e.g., while in an airplane or in a hospital.
For instance, in the United States federal regulations have been enacted that require people with cell phones to turn them off while in an airborne airplane, as it has been determined that cell phone usage may interfere with the operation of the airplane and/or its communications. Passengers comply with such regulations, but may nevertheless inadvertently forget to turn a cell phone off, or even forget that an active cell phone is in their purse, etc. There are currently no devices in airplanes to sniff out and identify cell phones that remain turned on during flight to ensure compliance with the regulations. In an attempt to dispel some fears of innocent bystanders, many establishments have posted rules regarding usage of such cellular telephones. For instance, many health clubs and spas do not permit use of wireless devices with cameras. To enforce such rules, health clubs often have a large, prominent sign placed in an entranceway to alert and remind users that they are not permitted to use cell phones with a camera while on the premises, or for that matter a camera at all. There are rarely officials in such establishments that monitor prohibited use of wireless devices, much less officials with the authority or capacity to stop unauthorized usage once discovered. So, non-usage of such camera- capable cell phones and other devices is largely voluntary, based on the honor system, and hopefully adhered to.
There is a need for an improved technique to easily and reliably, prevent unauthorized usage modes of wireless devices in given establishments, locales, vehicles, etc.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
In accordance with the principles of the present invention, a communications protocol for enforcing usage rules of a wireless device comprises establishing at least one rule relating to an action to be forcibly applied to a wireless device. At least one rule is wirelessly transmitted to the wireless device when the wireless device enters a physical area to which the usage rule applies. The at least one rule relates to an operational parameter of the wireless device without allowing a user of the wireless device to override the at least one rule.
A method of implementing a mandatory usage rule for operation of a wireless device in accordance with another aspect of the present invention comprises establishing a wireless link to receive at least one rule relating to operation of at least one feature of the wireless device when the wireless device enters a physical area to which the usage rule applies. An instruction contained by the at least one rule in the wireless device is automatically implemented. The at least one rule relates to an operational parameter of the wireless device without allowing a user of the wireless device to override the at least one rule.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
Features and advantages of the present invention will become apparent to those skilled in the art from the following description with reference to the drawings, in which:
Fig. 1 shows a number of BLUETOOTH™ enabled devices such as a cell phones, personal digital assistant (PDA), pager, and email device such as a BLACKBERRY™ or SMARTPHONE™ device, automatically controlled into enacting one or more rules provided by a Rules Enforcer Transceiver, in accordance with the principles of the present invention. Fig. 2A exemplifies a table of rules that may be maintained in the rules enforcer transceiver, in accordance with the principles of the present invention.
Fig. 2B shows that any one type device may have multiple rules applied, and those rules may be simple, or may be detailed and complex, in accordance with the principles of the present invention.
Fig. 3 shows relevant portions of a BLUETOOTH™ enabled phone and a Rules Enforcer Transceiver, shown in Fig. 1.
Fig. 4 shows an exemplary flow diagram of a Rules Enforcer Transceiver providing rules information to a BLUETOOTH™ enabled device such as a phone, PDA, etc., in accordance with the principles of the present invention.
Fig. 5 shows an exemplary flow diagram of a BLUETOOTH™ enabled device having a mode forcibly changed due to reception of an appropriate rule from a Rules Enforcer Transceiver, in accordance with the principles of the present invention. )
Fig. 6 shows an exemplary flow diagram of a BLUETOOTH™ enabled device being forcibly powered down due to reception of an appropriate rule from a Rules Enforcer Transceiver, in accordance with the principles of the present invention.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF ILLUSTRATIVE EMBODIMENTS
The present invention incorporates a set of usage rules that operates in conjunction with hardware which disables particular features of a wireless device (e.g., audible ringing, use of camera, etc.), or which forcibly powers down or otherwise disables an electronic device, based upon the presence of the electronic device in an area with restricted use rules. Thus, enablement of relevant features of a wireless device (e.g., cell phone) is restricted based on the presence of the wireless device in a predefined location. In accordance with the principles of the present invention, a
"Rules Enabled" cell phone or other wireless device may be safely taken into sensitive areas such as hospitals, movie theatres, etc. In locations where audible ringing is an annoyance, the cell phone configuration will be automatically affected. For instance, audible ringing may be disabled (or, alternatively, silent ringing such as vibration may be forcibly enabled.) Similarly, camera functionality may be disabled when entering given establishments that prohibit use of such devices, e.g., health clubs, spas, or corporate offices to prevent industrial espionage, etc.
Fig. 1 shows a number of BLUETOOTH™ enabled devices such as a cell phones, personal digital assistant (PDA), pager, and email device such as a BLACKBERRY™ or SMARTPHONE™ device, automatically controlled into enacting one or more rules provided by a Rules Enforcer Transceiver, in accordance with the principles of the present invention. in particular, as shown in Fig. 1 , various wireless devices, in particularly piconet devices conforming to a BLUETOOTH™ standard, enter a premises 111 (e.g., a hospital, airplane, etc.), and establish communications with a rules enforcer transceiver 150.
In operation, an appropriate transmitted device, referred to herein as a 'rules transmitter' or 'rules enforcer transceiver' 150, is placed near entrances and/or exits and throughout a given establishment to be protected by such rules. This allows and dis-allows relevant handset features of the cell phone based on the particular site and location within a site, and on a user specific basis.
Such 'rules' transmitter 150 may be based on RF, BLUETOOTH™, infrared, etc. technologies depending upon the region to cover. As such, the relevant wireless devices are equipped with an appropriate matching receiver also based on RF, BLUETOOTH™, infrared, etc. technologies.
In the given example, the rules enforcer transceiver 150 acts as a master, and each of the wireless communications devices 100a-100d establish a piconet network virtual link with the rules enforcer transceiver
150.
Fig. 2A exemplifies a table of rules 207 that may be maintained in the rules enforcer transceiver 150, in accordance with the principles of the present invention. While the particular table used may take any form and/or contain any rules, such rules are restrictive to the devices to which they are associated.
For instance, a rule to "power down" may be associated with cell phones that come into the network including the rules enforcer transceiver 150, as shown by the first entry in the table 207.
In an exemplary second entry in the table 207 shown in Fig.
2A, all personal digital assistants (PDAs) have a rule applied which instructs them to forcibly, automatically power down if they are powered up to receive the rule. Of course, devices which are already powered down need not have a rule received and/or applied. All devices of a type may be affected, or qualifications may be applied. For instance, all cell phones may be instructed to power down with a single rule. Alternatively, only cell phones including a camera may be instructed to power down, while cell phones without a camera may be permitted to continue operating, i.e., have no rule applied to them.
In a third entry of table 207, pagers have a rule which forcibly causes them to enter a silent mode (e.g., no audible beeping, just vibration).
In a fourth entry, 'other devices', i.e., devices which are not otherwise represented in the table 207, are instructed to power down.
In a fifth entry of table 207, qualifications may be applied to any/all devices. For instance, devices which carry identifications associated with state or government officials (e.g., police, military, fire department, etc.) may also receive a rule that cancels any other rule. Thus, it is possible that some rules may trump other rules.
Fig. 2B shows that any one type device may have multiple rules applied, and those rules may be simple, or may be detailed and complex. Multiple rules are preferably compiled by the rules enforcer transceiver 150 before transmission to the wireless devices 100a-100d, but may be transmitted individually and assimilated by the individual wireless devices 100a-100d.
As exemplified in Fig. 2B, time and/or date information may be included with any particular rule. For instance, time and/or date restrictive rules may be applied to any of the rules. As an example, perhaps in a hospital environment cell phone usage may be restricted only during evening hours, in which case a power down rule may be communicated from the rules enforcer transceiver 150 to the BLUETOOTH™ enabled phone 100a only during evening hours.
Rules from the rules enforcer transceiver 150 are mandatory to the relevant wireless phones 100a-100d, and thus can be considered to 'forcibly' cause the desired action, be it power down, change of mode, disablement of a particular feature, etc.
Fig. 3 shows relevant portions of a BLUETOOTH™ enabled phone and a Rules Enforcer Transceiver, shown in Fig. 1. In particular, as shown in Fig. 3, a rules enforcer 150 includes a wireless transceiver to establish a link with the relevant wireless device, e.g., BLUETOOTH™ RF transceiver 254. An information exchange module 252 obtains relevant rules from a rules database 256, and communicates the same via the appropriate protocol (e.g., BLUETOOTH™) to the relevant wireless device.
Also shown in Fig. 3, the receiving wireless device, e.g. a BLUETOOTH™ enabled phone 100a includes a wireless transceiver 206, a matching information exchange module 204, and an application or module 208 that implements the particular rule that had been received. For instance, if instructed to enter a silent mode, a forced silent mode initiation module 208 may be activated by the information exchange module 204 to disable any audible ringing, etc., and to enable silent operation using devices such as a vibrator 209.
The rules receiver receives the site and user specific rules, then appropriately disables certain features of the wireless device (e.g., disables audible ringing, disables use of the camera, etc.) The particular rule or set of usage 'rules' for the various features of an affected BLUETOOTH™ enabled device (e.g., a BLUETOOTH™ capable cell phone) are developed based on the particular features offered. Fig. 4 shows an exemplary flow diagram of a Rules Enforcer
Transceiver providing rules information to a BLUETOOTH™ enabled device such as a phone, PDA, etc., in accordance with the principles of the present invention.
In particular, as shown in step 402 of Fig. 4, a user of a wireless device enters a premises, location, airplane, etc. that is covered within the range of a rules enforcer transceiver 150. In step 404, a link is established between the wireless device and the rules enforcer transceiver 150, a BLUETOOTH™ piconet in the given example but not limited to Bluetooth™.
In step 406, device information is optionally exchanged with the rules enforcer transceiver such that the device type can be determined (e.g., whether the wireless device is a cell phone, PDA, pager, Smartphone, etc.)
In step 408, the rules enforcer transceiver 150 obtains the relevant rules to the type device, preferably combines the same into consistent rules, and then transmits the rule(s) to the wireless device.
In step 409, having received one or more rules from the rules enforcer transceiver 150, the instructions of the received rules are automatically, forcibly carried out, whether or not the user of the wireless device agrees. Fig. 5 shows an exemplary flow diagram of a
BLUETOOTH™ enabled device having a mode forcibly changed due to reception of an appropriate rule from a Rules Enforcer Transceiver, in accordance with the principles of the present invention.
In particular, as shown in Fig. 5, as shown in step 502, one or more rules is received from the rules enforcer transceiver 150.
In step 504, upon receipt of the rule(s), the receiving wireless device 100 automatically initiates the requested action. While the wireless device 100 may warn of the impending action using, e.g., a display, the user of the wireless device is preferably not allowed to override the particular action, perhaps with the exception of allowing the user to manually power down the wireless device.
In one embodiment, the presence of a 'rules' signal and a base station causes the handset to operate based on the given site specific rules. In the absence of a rules signal, the wireless handset (e.g., cell phone) will resume normal operation. Thus, preferably, a repeated transmission of the rules from the rules enforcer transceiver 150 may allow affected wireless devices to automatically recover from the forcible action after a given time out. As one example of a technique to implement this scenario, as shown in step 506, a rule timeout timer may be set.
In step 508, the timer is monitored to determine if the rule timeout timer has expired.
In step 510, the wireless device looks for retransmission of the relevant rule. If no retransmission is available, then the wireless device may be allowed to re-enter unrestricted use within the premises.
Fig. 6 shows an exemplary flow diagram of a BLUETOOTH™ enabled device being forcibly powered down due to reception of an appropriate rule from a Rules Enforcer Transceiver, in accordance with the principles of the present invention. In particular, as shown in step 602 of Fig. 6, a rule is received from the rules enforcer transceiver 150.
In step 604, a power down is automatically (i.e., forcibly) initiated in the relevant wireless device, e.g., in a BLUETOOTH™ enabled device. While disclosed and described with respect to wireless devices in general, and BLUETOOH™ capable cell phones, personal digital assistants (PDAs), pagers and email devices in particular, the present invention has applicability to many other portable electronic devices. Also, while BLUETOOTH™ piconet protocol is described, other short range wireless protocols may be used as the rules transmission mechanism, e.g., ZIGBEE™.
While the invention has been described with reference to the exemplary preferred embodiments thereof, those skilled in the art will be able to make various modifications to the described embodiments of the invention without departing from the true spirit and scope of the invention.

Claims

CLAIMSWhat is claimed is:
1. A communications protocol for enforcing usage rules upon a wireless device, comprising: establishing at least one rule relating to an action to be forcibly initiated by said wireless device; and wirelessly transmitting said at least one rule to said wireless device when said wireless device enters a physical area to which said usage rule applies; wherein said at least one rule relates to an operational parameter of said wireless device without allowing a user of said wireless device to override said at least one rule.
2. The communications protocol for enforcing usage rules of a wireless device according to claim 1 , wherein: said usage rule is a forcible power down of said wireless device.
3. The communications protocol for enforcing usage rules of a wireless device according to claim 1, wherein: said usage rule is a forcible change of mode of said wireless device.
4. The communications protocol for enforcing usage rules of a wireless device according to claim 3, wherein: said forcible change of mode is initiation of a silent mode of said wireless device.
5. The communications protocol for enforcing usage rules of a wireless device according to claim 1 , wherein: said wireless device is a cell phone.
6. The communications protocol for enforcing usage rules of a wireless device according to claim 1 , wherein: said wireless device is a personal digital assistant (PDA).
7. The communications protocol for enforcing usage rules of a wireless device according to claim 1 , wherein: said wireless device is an email device.
8. The communications protocol for enforcing usage rules of a wireless device according to claim 1 , wherein: said wireless transmission is transmitted over an established piconet network.
9. The communications protocol for enforcing usage rules of a wireless device according to claim 8, wherein: said established piconet network conforms to
BLUETOOTH™ standards.
10. A method of implementing a mandatory usage rule for operation of a wireless device, comprising: establishing a wireless link to receive at least one rule relating to operation of at least one feature of said wireless device when said wireless device enters a physical area to which said usage rule applies; and automatically implementing an instruction contained by said at least one rule in said wireless device; wherein said at least one rule relates to an operational parameter of said wireless device without allowing a user of said wireless device to override said at least one rule.
11. The method of enforcing usage rules of a wireless device according to claim 10, wherein: said usage rule is a forcible power down of said wireless device.
12. The method of enforcing usage rules of a wireless device according to claim 10, wherein: said usage rule is a forcible change of mode of said wireless device.
13. The method of enforcing usage rules of a wireless device according to claim 12, wherein: said forcible change of mode is initiation of a silent mode of saijd wireless device.
14. The method of enforcing usage rules of a wireless device according to claim 10, wherein: said wireless device is a cell phone.
15. The method of enforcing usage rules of a wireless device according to claim 10, wherein: said wireless device is a personal digital assistant (PDA).
16. The method of enforcing usage rules of a wireless device according to claim 10, wherein: said wireless device is an email device.
17. The method of enforcing usage rules of a wireless device according to claim 10, wherein: said wireless link is a piconet network.
18. The method of enforcing usage rules of a wireless device according to claim 17, wherein: said piconet network conforms to BLUETOOTH™ standards.
19. Apparatus for enforcing usage rules of a wireless device, comprising: means for establishing at least one rule relating to an action to be forcibly initiated by said wireless device; and means for wirelessly transmitting said at least one rule to said wireless device when said wireless device enters a physical area to which said usage rule applies; wherein said at least one rule relates to an operational parameter of said wireless device without allowing a user of said wireless device to override said at least one rule.
20. Apparatus for implementing a mandatory usage rule for operation of a wireless device, comprising: means for establishing a wireless link to receive at least one rule relating to operation of at least one feature of said wireless device when said wireless device enters a physical area to which said usage rule applies; and means for automatically implementing an instruction contained by said at least one rule in said wireless device; wherein said at least one rule relates to an operational parameter of said wireless device without allowing a user of said wireless device to override said at least one rule.
EP04757113A 2004-07-20 2004-07-20 Enforcement of permitted cell phone usage Withdrawn EP1769624A4 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
PCT/US2004/023117 WO2006019378A1 (en) 2004-07-20 2004-07-20 Enforcement of permitted cell phone usage

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP1769624A1 true EP1769624A1 (en) 2007-04-04
EP1769624A4 EP1769624A4 (en) 2011-08-31

Family

ID=35907687

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP04757113A Withdrawn EP1769624A4 (en) 2004-07-20 2004-07-20 Enforcement of permitted cell phone usage

Country Status (3)

Country Link
EP (1) EP1769624A4 (en)
JP (1) JP4527774B2 (en)
WO (1) WO2006019378A1 (en)

Families Citing this family (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US8406248B2 (en) 2007-04-13 2013-03-26 Hart Communication Foundation Priority-based scheduling and routing in a wireless network
CA2774225C (en) * 2009-09-16 2018-10-23 John J. Fischer Standard mobile communication device distraction prevention and safety protocols
US9294603B2 (en) 2009-09-16 2016-03-22 Try Safety First, Inc. Standard mobile communication device distraction prevention and safety protocols
JP5717623B2 (en) * 2011-12-28 2015-05-13 株式会社エヌ・ティ・ティ・データ Wireless communication terminal function control system, wireless communication terminal function control method, and program
CN106372862A (en) * 2016-09-29 2017-02-01 北京小米移动软件有限公司 Method and device for turning off alarm clock of device

Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US6324408B1 (en) * 1999-05-28 2001-11-27 Ericsson Inc. Power control in sensitive environments for private wireless systems
US20020016180A1 (en) * 2000-07-25 2002-02-07 Derosier J. David Communication device intervention system and method
US20030092428A1 (en) * 2001-11-15 2003-05-15 Ibm Corporation System and method for mitigating the mobile phone nuisance factor
US6687497B1 (en) * 2000-02-11 2004-02-03 Sony Electronics Inc. Method, system, and structure for disabling a communication device during the occurrence of one or more predetermined conditions

Family Cites Families (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2001218264A (en) * 2000-01-31 2001-08-10 Toshiba Corp Mobile communication terminal and communication controller
JP3442358B2 (en) * 2000-08-29 2003-09-02 船井電機株式会社 Mobile phone control system
JP2004048166A (en) * 2002-07-09 2004-02-12 Toshiba Corp Mobile communication system, mobile terminal used for the mobile communication system, and transmission station

Patent Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US6324408B1 (en) * 1999-05-28 2001-11-27 Ericsson Inc. Power control in sensitive environments for private wireless systems
US6687497B1 (en) * 2000-02-11 2004-02-03 Sony Electronics Inc. Method, system, and structure for disabling a communication device during the occurrence of one or more predetermined conditions
US20020016180A1 (en) * 2000-07-25 2002-02-07 Derosier J. David Communication device intervention system and method
US20030092428A1 (en) * 2001-11-15 2003-05-15 Ibm Corporation System and method for mitigating the mobile phone nuisance factor

Non-Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
See also references of WO2006019378A1 *

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JP4527774B2 (en) 2010-08-18
EP1769624A4 (en) 2011-08-31
WO2006019378A1 (en) 2006-02-23
JP2008507893A (en) 2008-03-13

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US20060019645A1 (en) Enforcement of permitted cell phone usage
US10425528B2 (en) Standard mobile communication device distraction prevention and safety protocols
US7853268B2 (en) GPS enabled cell phone location tracking for security purposes
US8044794B2 (en) Mobile wireless communications device blocker and associated methods
US8565716B2 (en) Devices, systems and methods for detecting proximal traffic
KR101410988B1 (en) Location management system
US20130078979A1 (en) Apparatus and methods for enforcement of policies upon a wireless device
US20090251312A1 (en) Private Network Emergency Alert Pager System
DK2478505T3 (en) Standard Mobile Communications Device Distraction Prevention and Security Protocols
WO2004089021A2 (en) Portable digital devices
KR20120050265A (en) Emergency system to inform of cellphone
EP1536391A1 (en) Lone worker monitor
US7505730B2 (en) Cellular phone jammer that permits cellular communication in an emergency
EP1769624A1 (en) Enforcement of permitted cell phone usage
CA2821197A1 (en) Cellular phone ignition interlock device and method of controlling cellular phone usage
US20220407956A1 (en) System and method for limiting mobile device functionality in a geographic area
JP4463189B2 (en) Mobile device with search function
KR20070083494A (en) Enforcement of permitted cell phone usage
JP3789078B2 (en) Mobile radio communication system
JP2007201754A (en) Wireless communication control system
JP2003169381A (en) Mobile telephone system
WO2008010806A1 (en) Wireless communications management system
KR20210090188A (en) Systems and methods for limiting mobile device functionality within a geographic area
KR100547816B1 (en) Camera Function Control System Apparatus and Method of Camera Phone
GB2573490A (en) A fall sensing system

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20070119

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): DE

RIN1 Information on inventor provided before grant (corrected)

Inventor name: AZIMI, KOUROS

Inventor name: MICHEJDA, JOHN

Inventor name: FETTERMAN, H., SCOTT

RBV Designated contracting states (corrected)

Designated state(s): DE

DAX Request for extension of the european patent (deleted)
A4 Supplementary search report drawn up and despatched

Effective date: 20110729

RIC1 Information provided on ipc code assigned before grant

Ipc: H04M 3/00 20060101AFI20110725BHEP

Ipc: H04L 29/08 20060101ALI20110725BHEP

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: THE APPLICATION IS DEEMED TO BE WITHDRAWN

18D Application deemed to be withdrawn

Effective date: 20111127