EP1916076A1 - Coating for stationery cutting implements - Google Patents

Coating for stationery cutting implements Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP1916076A1
EP1916076A1 EP08000011A EP08000011A EP1916076A1 EP 1916076 A1 EP1916076 A1 EP 1916076A1 EP 08000011 A EP08000011 A EP 08000011A EP 08000011 A EP08000011 A EP 08000011A EP 1916076 A1 EP1916076 A1 EP 1916076A1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
coating
cutting
weight
blades
cutting implement
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
EP08000011A
Other languages
German (de)
French (fr)
Other versions
EP1916076B1 (en
Inventor
Larry Buchtmann
Gary Pia
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Acme United Corp
Original Assignee
Acme United Corp
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Acme United Corp filed Critical Acme United Corp
Priority claimed from EP02782295A external-priority patent/EP1453642B1/en
Publication of EP1916076A1 publication Critical patent/EP1916076A1/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP1916076B1 publication Critical patent/EP1916076B1/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Lifetime legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B26HAND CUTTING TOOLS; CUTTING; SEVERING
    • B26BHAND-HELD CUTTING TOOLS NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • B26B13/00Hand shears; Scissors
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B26HAND CUTTING TOOLS; CUTTING; SEVERING
    • B26BHAND-HELD CUTTING TOOLS NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • B26B25/00Hand cutting tools involving disc blades, e.g. motor-driven
    • B26B25/005Manually operated, e.g. pizza cutters
    • B26B25/007Operable only in combination with guiding means, e.g. paper cutters
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B26HAND CUTTING TOOLS; CUTTING; SEVERING
    • B26DCUTTING; DETAILS COMMON TO MACHINES FOR PERFORATING, PUNCHING, CUTTING-OUT, STAMPING-OUT OR SEVERING
    • B26D1/00Cutting through work characterised by the nature or movement of the cutting member or particular materials not otherwise provided for; Apparatus or machines therefor; Cutting members therefor
    • B26D1/0006Cutting members therefor
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C23COATING METALLIC MATERIAL; COATING MATERIAL WITH METALLIC MATERIAL; CHEMICAL SURFACE TREATMENT; DIFFUSION TREATMENT OF METALLIC MATERIAL; COATING BY VACUUM EVAPORATION, BY SPUTTERING, BY ION IMPLANTATION OR BY CHEMICAL VAPOUR DEPOSITION, IN GENERAL; INHIBITING CORROSION OF METALLIC MATERIAL OR INCRUSTATION IN GENERAL
    • C23CCOATING METALLIC MATERIAL; COATING MATERIAL WITH METALLIC MATERIAL; SURFACE TREATMENT OF METALLIC MATERIAL BY DIFFUSION INTO THE SURFACE, BY CHEMICAL CONVERSION OR SUBSTITUTION; COATING BY VACUUM EVAPORATION, BY SPUTTERING, BY ION IMPLANTATION OR BY CHEMICAL VAPOUR DEPOSITION, IN GENERAL
    • C23C30/00Coating with metallic material characterised only by the composition of the metallic material, i.e. not characterised by the coating process
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C23COATING METALLIC MATERIAL; COATING MATERIAL WITH METALLIC MATERIAL; CHEMICAL SURFACE TREATMENT; DIFFUSION TREATMENT OF METALLIC MATERIAL; COATING BY VACUUM EVAPORATION, BY SPUTTERING, BY ION IMPLANTATION OR BY CHEMICAL VAPOUR DEPOSITION, IN GENERAL; INHIBITING CORROSION OF METALLIC MATERIAL OR INCRUSTATION IN GENERAL
    • C23CCOATING METALLIC MATERIAL; COATING MATERIAL WITH METALLIC MATERIAL; SURFACE TREATMENT OF METALLIC MATERIAL BY DIFFUSION INTO THE SURFACE, BY CHEMICAL CONVERSION OR SUBSTITUTION; COATING BY VACUUM EVAPORATION, BY SPUTTERING, BY ION IMPLANTATION OR BY CHEMICAL VAPOUR DEPOSITION, IN GENERAL
    • C23C30/00Coating with metallic material characterised only by the composition of the metallic material, i.e. not characterised by the coating process
    • C23C30/005Coating with metallic material characterised only by the composition of the metallic material, i.e. not characterised by the coating process on hard metal substrates
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B26HAND CUTTING TOOLS; CUTTING; SEVERING
    • B26DCUTTING; DETAILS COMMON TO MACHINES FOR PERFORATING, PUNCHING, CUTTING-OUT, STAMPING-OUT OR SEVERING
    • B26D1/00Cutting through work characterised by the nature or movement of the cutting member or particular materials not otherwise provided for; Apparatus or machines therefor; Cutting members therefor
    • B26D1/01Cutting through work characterised by the nature or movement of the cutting member or particular materials not otherwise provided for; Apparatus or machines therefor; Cutting members therefor involving a cutting member which does not travel with the work
    • B26D1/04Cutting through work characterised by the nature or movement of the cutting member or particular materials not otherwise provided for; Apparatus or machines therefor; Cutting members therefor involving a cutting member which does not travel with the work having a linearly-movable cutting member
    • B26D1/045Cutting through work characterised by the nature or movement of the cutting member or particular materials not otherwise provided for; Apparatus or machines therefor; Cutting members therefor involving a cutting member which does not travel with the work having a linearly-movable cutting member for thin material, e.g. for sheets, strips or the like
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B26HAND CUTTING TOOLS; CUTTING; SEVERING
    • B26DCUTTING; DETAILS COMMON TO MACHINES FOR PERFORATING, PUNCHING, CUTTING-OUT, STAMPING-OUT OR SEVERING
    • B26D1/00Cutting through work characterised by the nature or movement of the cutting member or particular materials not otherwise provided for; Apparatus or machines therefor; Cutting members therefor
    • B26D1/01Cutting through work characterised by the nature or movement of the cutting member or particular materials not otherwise provided for; Apparatus or machines therefor; Cutting members therefor involving a cutting member which does not travel with the work
    • B26D1/12Cutting through work characterised by the nature or movement of the cutting member or particular materials not otherwise provided for; Apparatus or machines therefor; Cutting members therefor involving a cutting member which does not travel with the work having a cutting member moving about an axis
    • B26D1/14Cutting through work characterised by the nature or movement of the cutting member or particular materials not otherwise provided for; Apparatus or machines therefor; Cutting members therefor involving a cutting member which does not travel with the work having a cutting member moving about an axis with a circular cutting member, e.g. disc cutter
    • B26D1/157Cutting through work characterised by the nature or movement of the cutting member or particular materials not otherwise provided for; Apparatus or machines therefor; Cutting members therefor involving a cutting member which does not travel with the work having a cutting member moving about an axis with a circular cutting member, e.g. disc cutter rotating about a movable axis
    • B26D1/18Cutting through work characterised by the nature or movement of the cutting member or particular materials not otherwise provided for; Apparatus or machines therefor; Cutting members therefor involving a cutting member which does not travel with the work having a cutting member moving about an axis with a circular cutting member, e.g. disc cutter rotating about a movable axis mounted on a movable carriage
    • B26D1/185Cutting through work characterised by the nature or movement of the cutting member or particular materials not otherwise provided for; Apparatus or machines therefor; Cutting members therefor involving a cutting member which does not travel with the work having a cutting member moving about an axis with a circular cutting member, e.g. disc cutter rotating about a movable axis mounted on a movable carriage for thin material, e.g. for sheets, strips or the like
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B26HAND CUTTING TOOLS; CUTTING; SEVERING
    • B26DCUTTING; DETAILS COMMON TO MACHINES FOR PERFORATING, PUNCHING, CUTTING-OUT, STAMPING-OUT OR SEVERING
    • B26D1/00Cutting through work characterised by the nature or movement of the cutting member or particular materials not otherwise provided for; Apparatus or machines therefor; Cutting members therefor
    • B26D1/01Cutting through work characterised by the nature or movement of the cutting member or particular materials not otherwise provided for; Apparatus or machines therefor; Cutting members therefor involving a cutting member which does not travel with the work
    • B26D1/12Cutting through work characterised by the nature or movement of the cutting member or particular materials not otherwise provided for; Apparatus or machines therefor; Cutting members therefor involving a cutting member which does not travel with the work having a cutting member moving about an axis
    • B26D1/14Cutting through work characterised by the nature or movement of the cutting member or particular materials not otherwise provided for; Apparatus or machines therefor; Cutting members therefor involving a cutting member which does not travel with the work having a cutting member moving about an axis with a circular cutting member, e.g. disc cutter
    • B26D1/20Cutting through work characterised by the nature or movement of the cutting member or particular materials not otherwise provided for; Apparatus or machines therefor; Cutting members therefor involving a cutting member which does not travel with the work having a cutting member moving about an axis with a circular cutting member, e.g. disc cutter coacting with a fixed member
    • B26D1/205Cutting through work characterised by the nature or movement of the cutting member or particular materials not otherwise provided for; Apparatus or machines therefor; Cutting members therefor involving a cutting member which does not travel with the work having a cutting member moving about an axis with a circular cutting member, e.g. disc cutter coacting with a fixed member for thin material, e.g. for sheets, strips or the like
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B26HAND CUTTING TOOLS; CUTTING; SEVERING
    • B26DCUTTING; DETAILS COMMON TO MACHINES FOR PERFORATING, PUNCHING, CUTTING-OUT, STAMPING-OUT OR SEVERING
    • B26D1/00Cutting through work characterised by the nature or movement of the cutting member or particular materials not otherwise provided for; Apparatus or machines therefor; Cutting members therefor
    • B26D1/01Cutting through work characterised by the nature or movement of the cutting member or particular materials not otherwise provided for; Apparatus or machines therefor; Cutting members therefor involving a cutting member which does not travel with the work
    • B26D1/12Cutting through work characterised by the nature or movement of the cutting member or particular materials not otherwise provided for; Apparatus or machines therefor; Cutting members therefor involving a cutting member which does not travel with the work having a cutting member moving about an axis
    • B26D1/25Cutting through work characterised by the nature or movement of the cutting member or particular materials not otherwise provided for; Apparatus or machines therefor; Cutting members therefor involving a cutting member which does not travel with the work having a cutting member moving about an axis with a non-circular cutting member
    • B26D1/26Cutting through work characterised by the nature or movement of the cutting member or particular materials not otherwise provided for; Apparatus or machines therefor; Cutting members therefor involving a cutting member which does not travel with the work having a cutting member moving about an axis with a non-circular cutting member moving about an axis substantially perpendicular to the line of cut
    • B26D1/30Cutting through work characterised by the nature or movement of the cutting member or particular materials not otherwise provided for; Apparatus or machines therefor; Cutting members therefor involving a cutting member which does not travel with the work having a cutting member moving about an axis with a non-circular cutting member moving about an axis substantially perpendicular to the line of cut with limited pivotal movement to effect cut
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B26HAND CUTTING TOOLS; CUTTING; SEVERING
    • B26DCUTTING; DETAILS COMMON TO MACHINES FOR PERFORATING, PUNCHING, CUTTING-OUT, STAMPING-OUT OR SEVERING
    • B26D1/00Cutting through work characterised by the nature or movement of the cutting member or particular materials not otherwise provided for; Apparatus or machines therefor; Cutting members therefor
    • B26D1/0006Cutting members therefor
    • B26D2001/002Materials or surface treatments therefor, e.g. composite materials

Definitions

  • the present invention is related to stationery cutting implements such as scissors, shears, guillotine style paper trimmers, and rotary style paper trimmers. More particularly, the present invention is related to a coating for such cutting implements.
  • a cutting implement comprising a pair of cutting blades and a coating.
  • the coating comprises titanium chromium nitride, which provides the cutting blades with a satin silver appearance.
  • a cutting implement having a pair of complementary cutting blades and a titanium chromium nitride coating is also provided.
  • the titanium chromium nitride coating is disposed on each of the cutting blades.
  • the titanium chromium nitride coating has a thickness in a range between about 0.3 and 0.5 microns, a surface roughness in a range of about 15 to 25 10-6 inch/inch, and a hardness in a range of about 5.7 to about 9.1 gigapascals.
  • Figure 1 is a first side view of an exemplary embodiment of a pair of scissors
  • Figure 2 is a second, opposite side view of Figure 1 ;
  • Figures 3 and 4 are side views of the blades of Figure 1 ;
  • Figure 5 is a data table of testing results of various exemplary embodiments of a coating of the present invention for the scissors of Figure 1 ;
  • Figure 6 is a perspective view of an exemplary embodiment of a rotary style paper trimmer
  • Figure 7 is a sectional view along line 7-7 of Figure 6 ;
  • Figure 8 is a perspective view of an exemplary embodiment of a guillotine style paper trimmer.
  • Figure 9 is a side view of the guillotine style paper trimmer of Figure 8 .
  • Scissors 10 have a first half 12 pivotally connected to a second half 14.
  • First and second halves 12,14 are pivotally connected by conventional connection means, such as a screw 16 and a post 18.
  • First half 12 can have a handle 20 and a blade 22.
  • second half 14 can have a handle 24 and a blade 26.
  • Each blade 22,26 has a cutting edge 28.
  • cutting edge 28 is formed by way of a bevel 30 disposed on each blade 22,26, respectively.
  • scissors 10 provide a pair of complementary cutting blades 22,26 for cutting stationery products, such as paper, cardboard, bristol board, and others.
  • Handles 20,24 are preferably overmolded onto blades 22,26, respectively.
  • each half 12,14 of scissors 10 is described as having separate handles 20,24 overmolded onto blades 22,26, respectively.
  • each half 12,14 have a unitary handle and blade portion.
  • Blade 22 is illustrated in Figure 3
  • blade 26 is illustrated in Figure 4
  • Blades 22,26 are preferably made of steel, more preferably stainless steel, such as 420 stainless steel.
  • blades 22,26 can be heat-treated to further increase the hardness of the blades.
  • Scissors 10 further include a coating 32 disposed on each blade 22, 26.
  • Coating 32 provides cutting edges 28 with extremely tough, hard, wear resistant characteristics. The increased hardness of cutting edges 28 provides scissors 10 with substantially increased longevity, while also providing the scissors with corrosion resistance, as well as providing a smooth and uniform appearance and color. For example, scissors 10 having coating 32 were subjected to cycle testing of 10,000 openings and closing without showing any signs of wear to the coating.
  • coating 32 provides scissors 10 with an aesthetically acceptable color or appearance. Specifically, coating 32 differentiates blades 22,26 having coating 32 from uncoated blades. Coating 32 does not change the color of blades 22,26 to the point that the consumer no longer recognizes scissors 10 as being useable for general household and office use. However, coating 32 has an appearance sufficient to allow the consumer to recognize that the coating is present on scissors 10.
  • coating 32 increases the ease of use of scissors 10 by providing blades 22,26 with a smooth surface finish, which reduces friction between the blades during use.
  • blades 22,26 have less friction between the two inside blade faces, which provides a smoother cutting action and less cutting effort than in coated blades without coating 32.
  • Coating 32 is selected from the group consisting of titanium nitride (TiN), chromium nitride (CrN), and titanium chromium nitride (TiCrN). More preferably, coating 32 is a multiple component barrier of titanium chromium nitride.
  • Coating 32 is disposed on blades 22,26 such that the coating forms a metallurgical bond with the blades, which resists flaking, blistering, chipping, and peeling. In fact, coating 32 is adsorbed into the surface layer of the metal of blades 22,26. Coating 32 is disposed on blades 22,26 with a thickness in a range between about 0.3 and 0.5 microns, more preferably about 0.4 microns.
  • Figure 5 illustrates the test results for a range of compositions and processes for coating 32.
  • Sample 1 is a control or uncoated blade formed of heat-treated 420 stainless steel. Heat-treated 420 stainless steel blades were also used in Samples 2 though 10.
  • the concentration of coating 32 in all samples were tested and were in the range of about +/-3 to 4 percent of the target composition. The testing also showed that both the elements are uniformly deposited and there is no segregation or isolation of each to any particular region in the film.
  • the first process was a reactive magnetron sputtering with a pulsed dc source.
  • the second process comprised a cathode arc plasma (CAP) process.
  • the sputtering gas mixture in each process was argon and nitrogen.
  • a four-inch circular target is used with a pulsed dc power supply.
  • the target was a combination target having one or more 90-degree sections of pure titanium and chromium.
  • the target is three 90-degree sections of pure titanium and one 90-degree section of pure chromium.
  • each target being pure titanium and chromium.
  • the partial pressure of argon during the first process was maintained between 0 to 1 millitorr and that of nitrogen was maintained at 1 to 2 millitorr with the total sputtering gas pressure maintained between 2 to 3 millitorr.
  • the stainless steel chamber was evacuated to 2x10-5 Torr prior to the deposition. Cleaning of the target was carried with argon alone.
  • the sputtering current was kept at 0.3 amps during cleaning that was carried out for 3 minutes in all depositions. Deposition of the films on the blades during cleaning was prevented by a shutter that was withdrawn soon after cleaning the target.
  • the sputtering current was chosen at two different values, 0.5 amperes and 0.7 amperes.
  • Depositions were performed for two different total sputtering times, 15 minutes and 30 minutes.
  • the resulting thickness of the films was found to be 0.3 micrometers and 0.6 micrometers, respectively.
  • the deposition temperature has been optimized for the following conditions. Stainless steel scissors blades should not soften and therefore deposition temperature was kept at a temperature of about 150 ° and 200 °C.
  • the hardness of the samples was measured using a Vickers microhardness test according to American Society of Testing and Materials (ASTM) E384, last revised March 2001.
  • a diamond indenter is loaded to a desired amount, which causes the indenter to indent the sample.
  • the indentation is measured and converted to a hardness value.
  • the indenter is a three-sided, pyramid-shaped diamond probe tip with angle of 136 °.
  • the hardness values of Figure 5 represent the hardness of each sample with load of about 50 grams, with a load of about 400 grams for the uncoated sample 1.
  • the results of Figure 5 show that the coated samples (samples 2 to 10) are generally harder than the uncoated sample (sample 1). For example, sample 4 is about 125% harder than sample 1. Further, the results of Figure 5 show that the hardness of the coated samples (samples 2 to 10) generally tends to increase as the content of chromium increases.
  • the samples having a majority of chromium (e. g. , samples 6 and 10) had a gloss silver appearance, which was substantially similar to that of uncoated sample 1. In fact, it has been determined that consumers did not recognized that the scissors having a gloss silver appearance (e. g. , the samples having a majority of chromium) had any coating at all.
  • the samples having a majority of titanium had a satin gold appearance.
  • consumers recognized scissors having a satin gold appearance e. g., the samples having a majority of titanium
  • these scissors appear to the consumer to be specialty scissors.
  • the samples having a more balanced amount of titanium to chromium had a satin silver appearance.
  • consumers recognized scissors 10 having a satin silver appearance as being for general household use and as having a coating.
  • Chromium is typically about 2.5 times more expensive than titanium. Thus, forming coating 32 of a majority of chromium leads to a substantial increase in cost, with only minimal gains in hardness. For example, coating 32 having 75% chromium and 25% titanium is about 95% as hard as a coating of 100% chromium.
  • the chromium nitride forms a strong bond to the blade, but does not form a strong bond with itself.
  • chromium nitride can form a strong bond with the chromium oxide of blade 22,26, but does not form a strong bond with other chromium nitride molecules.
  • the samples having a majority of chromium exhibited a higher tendency to peel than other samples having a minority of chromium.
  • the diffusion barrier properties exhibited by the samples having a majority of titanium were superior to those having less titanium. Thus, the samples having a majority of titanium exhibited better stain and corrosion resistance than other samples having a minority of titanium.
  • Coating 32 having the desired hardness, smoothness, and diffusion barrier properties preferably is formed of titanium chromium nitride having about 35 percent by weight of titanium nitride and about 65 percent by weight of chromium nitride and with a hardness in a range of about 5.7 to about 9.1 gigapascals. More preferably, coating 32 has about 50 percent by weight of titanium nitride and about 50 percent by weight of chromium nitride and a hardness in a range of about 7.2 to about 7.6 gigapascals.
  • coating 32 having the aforementioned ratios of chromium nitride and titanium nitride provided scissors 10 with a visual indication that the coating had been applied, without affecting the consumer's impression of the target use of the scissors (i. e. , general household use). Moreover, coating 32 having the aforementioned ratios of chromium nitride and titanium nitride provided scissors 10 with drastically improved hardness over the uncoated sample 1.
  • the surface roughness of blades 22,26 before and after the application of coating 32 was also measured.
  • the surface roughness of the outside surface of blades 22,26 before coating 32 was in a range of about 20 to 25 10-6 inch/inch, but was reduced to about 15 to 20 10-6 inch/inch after the coating was applied.
  • the surface roughness of the inside surface of blades 22,26 before coating 32 was about 25 to 30 10-6 inch/inch, but was reduced to about 20 to 25 10-6 inch/inch after the coating was applied. It is believed that the roughness of blades 22,26 was reduced because the molecules of coating 32 predominantly bond with the valleys and indentations in the blades.
  • scissors 10 are described above by way of example only as having a coating applied by reactive magnetron sputtering and CAP processes. Any thin film forming method such as chemical vapor deposition, physical vapor deposition, thermal spraying and sintering after a dip coating may be employed for providing coating 32 to scissors 10.
  • the method of forming coating 32 has a maximum temperature sufficient to not soften or affect the heat- treatment of the uncoated blades.
  • coating 32 has been described above by way of example only as finding use with a cutting implement in the form of scissors 10.
  • coating 32 can provide the aforementioned benefits to other stationery cutting implements.
  • Figures 6 to 9 illustrate alternate exemplary embodiments of cutting implements, which have a coating.
  • Rotary style paper trimmer 110 is as shown and described in U. S. Provisional Application Serial No. 60/421,581 filed on October 28,2002 , the contents of which are incorporated herein by reference.
  • Trimmer 110 has a base 112 and a rotary cutting mechanism 114.
  • Base 112 has a rail 116 and a cutting blade or anvil 118.
  • Rotary cutting mechanism 114 has a circular cutting blade 120 disposed in a housing 122. Housing 122 is slideably received on rail 116.
  • Blade 120 is disposed in housing 122 opposite blade 118 as illustrated in Figure 7 .
  • Blade 120 has a cutting edge 124 formed at its outer periphery, while blade 118 has a corresponding cutting edge 126.
  • Rotary cutting mechanism 114 is also movably received on rail 116 such that cutting edges 124,126 can be moved into contact with one another. Accordingly, trimmer 110 has a pair of complementary cutting blades 118, 120.
  • a piece of paper 128 is positioned between cutting edges 124,126.
  • Rotary cutting mechanism 114 is moved such that cutting edge 124 is contact with cutting edge 126. Then, rotary cutting mechanism 114 is slid along rail 116 such that the interaction of cutting edge 124 on cutting edge 126 severs paper 128 disposed therebetween.
  • Blades 118, 120 are preferably made of steel, more preferably stainless steel, such as 420 stainless steel. In addition, blades 118,120 can be heat-treated to further increase the hardness of the complementary cutting blades.
  • Trimmer 110 has a coating 132 disposed on blades 118,120. As described in detail above with respect to the exemplary embodiments of Figures 1 to 5 , coating 132 has a thickness in a range between about 0.3 microns and 0.5 microns, more preferably about 0.4 microns.
  • Coating 132 provides the complementary cutting blades 118,120 with extremely tough, hard, wear resistant characteristics. This increased hardness provides trimmer 110 with substantially increased longevity, while also providing the trimmer with corrosion resistance, as well as providing a smooth and uniform appearance and color. Coating 132 provides trimmer 110 with an aesthetically acceptable color or appearance and reduces friction between the cutting blades during use.
  • Coating 132 can be made of titanium nitride (TiN), chromium nitride (CrN), or titanium chromium nitride (TiCrN). More preferably, coating 32 is a multiple component barrier of titanium chromium nitride.
  • Coating 132 having the desired hardness, smoothness, and diffusion barrier properties preferably is formed of titanium chromium nitride having about 35 percent by weight of titanium nitride and about 65 percent by weight of chromium nitride and with a hardness in a range of about 5.7 to about 9.1 gigapascals. More preferably, coating 32 has about 50 percent by weight of titanium nitride and about 50 percent by weight of chromium nitride and a hardness in a range of about 7.2 to about 7.6 gigapascals.
  • coating 132 provides trimmer 110 with a visual indication that the coating had been applied, without affecting the consumer's impression of the target use of the scissors (i. e., general household use). Moreover, coating 132 provides trimmer 110 with drastically improved hardness over the uncoated trimmers.
  • FIG. 8 and 9 An exemplary embodiment of a stationery cutting implement in the form of a guillotine style paper trimmer 210 is illustrated in Figures 8 and 9 .
  • Trimmer 210 is as shown and described in U. S. Provisional Application Serial No. 60/392,942 filed on July 1,2002 , the contents of which are incorporated herein by reference.
  • Trimmer 210 has a base 212 and a pivoting cutting mechanism 214.
  • Base 212 has a fixed cutting blade 216.
  • Pivoting cutting mechanism 214 has a movable cutting blade 220 pivotally secured to base 212 at a pivot point 218.
  • Each blade 216,220 has a cutting edge 224. Accordingly, trimmer 210 has a pair of complementary cutting blades 216,220.
  • a piece of paper (not shown) is positioned on base 212 so that the portion to be cut is disposed between the cutting edges 224. Pivoting cutting mechanism 214 is moved about pivot point 218 in the direction of arrow 226 such that the cutting edges 224 shear the paper.
  • Cutting blades 216,220 are preferably made of steel, more preferably stainless steel, such as 420 stainless steel. In addition, cutting blades 216,220 can be heat-treated to further increase the hardness of the complementary cutting blades.
  • Trimmer 210 has a coating 232 disposed on cutting blades 216,220. Again, coating 232 has a thickness in a range between about 0.3 microns and 0.5 microns, more preferably about 0.4 microns.
  • Coating 232 like coating 132, provides the complementary cutting blades with extremely tough, hard, wear resistant characteristics. This increased hardness provides trimmer 210 with substantially increased longevity, while also providing the trimmer with corrosion resistance, as well as providing a smooth and uniform appearance and color. Coating 232 provides trimmer 210 with an aesthetically acceptable color or appearance and reduces friction between the cutting blades during use.
  • Coating 232 can be made of titanium nitride (TiN), chromium nitride (CrN), or titanium chromium nitride (TiCrN). More preferably, coating 232 is a multiple component barrier of titanium chromium nitride. Coating 232 is formed of titanium chromium nitride having about 35 percent by weight of titanium nitride and about 65 percent by weight of chromium nitride and with a hardness in a range of about 5.7 to about 9.1 gigapascals. More preferably, coating 232 has about 50 percent by weight of titanium nitride and about 50 percent by weight of chromium nitride and a hardness in a range of about 7.2 to about 7.6 gigapascals.
  • the coating described herein for stationery cutting implements provides a cost competitive manner to improve the hardness, longevity, stain resistance, and ease of use of the cutting implement. For example, it has been found that the coating of the present invention, when applied using the aforementioned CAP process, increases the cost of the cutting implement by about seventeen cents, or less than 30% of the cost of manufacture the implement.

Abstract

A cutting implement having a pair of cutting blades and a coating is provided. The coating has titanium chromium nitride and provides the cutting blades with a satin silver appearance. In some embodiments, the titanium chromium nitride coating has a thickness in a range between about 0.3 microns and 0.5 microns, a surface roughness in a range of about 15 to 25 10-6 inch/inch, and a hardness in a range of about 5.7 to about 9.1 gigapascals

Description

    BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION 1. Field of the Invention
  • The present invention is related to stationery cutting implements such as scissors, shears, guillotine style paper trimmers, and rotary style paper trimmers. More particularly, the present invention is related to a coating for such cutting implements.
  • 2. Description of Related Art
  • Substantial effort has been expended in improving the construction and operation of stationery cutting implements for household and office use. Ever increasing demands have been placed on manufacturers of these products to increase the ease of use, the wear resistance, and the ease with which the products can be cleaned, while maintaining a competitive price. For example, typical household and office scissors have been unable to achieve a long-lasting cutting edge, which withstands the wide-variety of products being cut, at a competitive price.
  • Consequently, continued improvements in stationery cutting implements is desired.
  • BRIEF SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
  • It is an object of the present invention to provide a cutting implement having a coating.
  • It is a further object of the present invention to provide a cutting implement having a coating that provides one or more of improved wear resistance, increased hardness, pleasing appearance, reduced user effort, and increased stain resistance.
  • These and other objects of the present invention are provided by a cutting implement comprising a pair of cutting blades and a coating. The coating comprises titanium chromium nitride, which provides the cutting blades with a satin silver appearance.
  • A cutting implement having a pair of complementary cutting blades and a titanium chromium nitride coating is also provided. The titanium chromium nitride coating is disposed on each of the cutting blades. The titanium chromium nitride coating has a thickness in a range between about 0.3 and 0.5 microns, a surface roughness in a range of about 15 to 25 10-6 inch/inch, and a hardness in a range of about 5.7 to about 9.1 gigapascals.
  • The above-described and other features and advantages of the present invention will be appreciated and understood by those skilled in the art from the following detailed description, drawings, and appended claims
  • BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE SEVERAL VIEWS OF THE DRAWINGS
  • Figure 1 is a first side view of an exemplary embodiment of a pair of scissors;
  • Figure 2 is a second, opposite side view of Figure 1;
  • Figures 3 and 4 are side views of the blades of Figure 1;
  • Figure 5 is a data table of testing results of various exemplary embodiments of a coating of the present invention for the scissors of Figure 1;
  • Figure 6 is a perspective view of an exemplary embodiment of a rotary style paper trimmer;
  • Figure 7 is a sectional view along line 7-7 of Figure 6;
  • Figure 8 is a perspective view of an exemplary embodiment of a guillotine style paper trimmer; and
  • Figure 9 is a side view of the guillotine style paper trimmer of Figure 8.
  • DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
  • Referring now to the figures and in particular to Figures 1 and 2, a cutting implement in the form of pair of scissors generally indicated by reference numeral 10 is illustrated.
  • Scissors 10 have a first half 12 pivotally connected to a second half 14. First and second halves 12,14 are pivotally connected by conventional connection means, such as a screw 16 and a post 18. First half 12 can have a handle 20 and a blade 22. Similarly, second half 14 can have a handle 24 and a blade 26.
  • Each blade 22,26 has a cutting edge 28. Preferably, cutting edge 28 is formed by way of a bevel 30 disposed on each blade 22,26, respectively. Thus, scissors 10 provide a pair of complementary cutting blades 22,26 for cutting stationery products, such as paper, cardboard, bristol board, and others.
  • Handles 20,24 are preferably overmolded onto blades 22,26, respectively. However, it should be recognized that each half 12,14 of scissors 10 is described as having separate handles 20,24 overmolded onto blades 22,26, respectively. Of course, it is contemplated by the present invention that each half 12,14 have a unitary handle and blade portion.
  • Blade 22 is illustrated in Figure 3, while blade 26 is illustrated in Figure 4. Blades 22,26 are preferably made of steel, more preferably stainless steel, such as 420 stainless steel. In addition, blades 22,26 can be heat-treated to further increase the hardness of the blades.
  • Scissors 10 further include a coating 32 disposed on each blade 22, 26. Coating 32 provides cutting edges 28 with extremely tough, hard, wear resistant characteristics. The increased hardness of cutting edges 28 provides scissors 10 with substantially increased longevity, while also providing the scissors with corrosion resistance, as well as providing a smooth and uniform appearance and color. For example, scissors 10 having coating 32 were subjected to cycle testing of 10,000 openings and closing without showing any signs of wear to the coating.
  • In addition, coating 32 provides scissors 10 with an aesthetically acceptable color or appearance. Specifically, coating 32 differentiates blades 22,26 having coating 32 from uncoated blades. Coating 32 does not change the color of blades 22,26 to the point that the consumer no longer recognizes scissors 10 as being useable for general household and office use. However, coating 32 has an appearance sufficient to allow the consumer to recognize that the coating is present on scissors 10.
  • Further, coating 32 increases the ease of use of scissors 10 by providing blades 22,26 with a smooth surface finish, which reduces friction between the blades during use. Thus, blades 22,26 have less friction between the two inside blade faces, which provides a smoother cutting action and less cutting effort than in coated blades without coating 32.
  • Coating 32 is selected from the group consisting of titanium nitride (TiN), chromium nitride (CrN), and titanium chromium nitride (TiCrN). More preferably, coating 32 is a multiple component barrier of titanium chromium nitride.
  • Coating 32 is disposed on blades 22,26 such that the coating forms a metallurgical bond with the blades, which resists flaking, blistering, chipping, and peeling. In fact, coating 32 is adsorbed into the surface layer of the metal of blades 22,26. Coating 32 is disposed on blades 22,26 with a thickness in a range between about 0.3 and 0.5 microns, more preferably about 0.4 microns.
  • Figure 5 illustrates the test results for a range of compositions and processes for coating 32. Sample 1 is a control or uncoated blade formed of heat-treated 420 stainless steel. Heat-treated 420 stainless steel blades were also used in Samples 2 though 10.
  • In Samples 2 though 6, the blades were coated using a first process. Twelve (12) blades of each sample coating were prepared with a thickness of about 5.0 micrometers. In Samples 7 through 10, the blades were coated using a second process. All of the samples were then tested for surface smoothness, hardness, and color. The results of this testing are provided in Figure 5.
  • The concentration of coating 32 in all samples were tested and were in the range of about +/-3 to 4 percent of the target composition. The testing also showed that both the elements are uniformly deposited and there is no segregation or isolation of each to any particular region in the film.
  • The first process was a reactive magnetron sputtering with a pulsed dc source. The second process comprised a cathode arc plasma (CAP) process. The sputtering gas mixture in each process was argon and nitrogen.
  • In the first process, a four-inch circular target is used with a pulsed dc power supply. The target was a combination target having one or more 90-degree sections of pure titanium and chromium. For example, in Sample #3 the target is three 90-degree sections of pure titanium and one 90-degree section of pure chromium.
  • In the second process, two different targets were used simultaneously, with each target being pure titanium and chromium.
  • The partial pressure of argon during the first process was maintained between 0 to 1 millitorr and that of nitrogen was maintained at 1 to 2 millitorr with the total sputtering gas pressure maintained between 2 to 3 millitorr. The stainless steel chamber was evacuated to 2x10-5 Torr prior to the deposition. Cleaning of the target was carried with argon alone. The sputtering current was kept at 0.3 amps during cleaning that was carried out for 3 minutes in all depositions. Deposition of the films on the blades during cleaning was prevented by a shutter that was withdrawn soon after cleaning the target. The sputtering current was chosen at two different values, 0.5 amperes and 0.7 amperes. Depositions were performed for two different total sputtering times, 15 minutes and 30 minutes. The resulting thickness of the films was found to be 0.3 micrometers and 0.6 micrometers, respectively. The deposition temperature has been optimized for the following conditions. Stainless steel scissors blades should not soften and therefore deposition temperature was kept at a temperature of about 150 ° and 200 °C.
  • The hardness of the samples was measured using a Vickers microhardness test according to American Society of Testing and Materials (ASTM) E384, last revised March 2001. Here, a diamond indenter is loaded to a desired amount, which causes the indenter to indent the sample. The indentation is measured and converted to a hardness value. The indenter is a three-sided, pyramid-shaped diamond probe tip with angle of 136 °. The hardness values of Figure 5 represent the hardness of each sample with load of about 50 grams, with a load of about 400 grams for the uncoated sample 1.
  • The results of Figure 5 show that the coated samples (samples 2 to 10) are generally harder than the uncoated sample (sample 1). For example, sample 4 is about 125% harder than sample 1. Further, the results of Figure 5 show that the hardness of the coated samples (samples 2 to 10) generally tends to increase as the content of chromium increases.
  • In addition, the results of Figure 5 show that the silver appearance generally tends to increase as the content of chromium increases.
  • The samples having a majority of chromium (e. g. , samples 6 and 10) had a gloss silver appearance, which was substantially similar to that of uncoated sample 1. In fact, it has been determined that consumers did not recognized that the scissors having a gloss silver appearance (e. g. , the samples having a majority of chromium) had any coating at all.
  • In contrast, the samples having a majority of titanium (e. g., samples 2,3, 7, and 8) had a satin gold appearance. Here, it has been determined that consumers recognized scissors having a satin gold appearance (e. g., the samples having a majority of titanium) as being for uses other than general household and office use. Namely, these scissors appear to the consumer to be specialty scissors.
  • However, the samples having a more balanced amount of titanium to chromium (e. g. , samples 4,5, and 9) had a satin silver appearance. Here, it has been determined that consumers recognized scissors 10 having a satin silver appearance as being for general household use and as having a coating.
  • Chromium is typically about 2.5 times more expensive than titanium. Thus, forming coating 32 of a majority of chromium leads to a substantial increase in cost, with only minimal gains in hardness. For example, coating 32 having 75% chromium and 25% titanium is about 95% as hard as a coating of 100% chromium.
  • It has also been found that the chromium nitride forms a strong bond to the blade, but does not form a strong bond with itself. For example, chromium nitride can form a strong bond with the chromium oxide of blade 22,26, but does not form a strong bond with other chromium nitride molecules. Thus, the samples having a majority of chromium exhibited a higher tendency to peel than other samples having a minority of chromium.
  • The diffusion barrier properties exhibited by the samples having a majority of titanium were superior to those having less titanium. Thus, the samples having a majority of titanium exhibited better stain and corrosion resistance than other samples having a minority of titanium.
  • Coating 32 having the desired hardness, smoothness, and diffusion barrier properties preferably is formed of titanium chromium nitride having about 35 percent by weight of titanium nitride and about 65 percent by weight of chromium nitride and with a hardness in a range of about 5.7 to about 9.1 gigapascals. More preferably, coating 32 has about 50 percent by weight of titanium nitride and about 50 percent by weight of chromium nitride and a hardness in a range of about 7.2 to about 7.6 gigapascals.
  • It has been determined that coating 32 having the aforementioned ratios of chromium nitride and titanium nitride provided scissors 10 with a visual indication that the coating had been applied, without affecting the consumer's impression of the target use of the scissors (i. e. , general household use). Moreover, coating 32 having the aforementioned ratios of chromium nitride and titanium nitride provided scissors 10 with drastically improved hardness over the uncoated sample 1.
  • The surface roughness of blades 22,26 before and after the application of coating 32 was also measured. For example, the surface roughness of the outside surface of blades 22,26 before coating 32 was in a range of about 20 to 25 10-6 inch/inch, but was reduced to about 15 to 20 10-6 inch/inch after the coating was applied. Similarly, the surface roughness of the inside surface of blades 22,26 before coating 32 was about 25 to 30 10-6 inch/inch, but was reduced to about 20 to 25 10-6 inch/inch after the coating was applied. It is believed that the roughness of blades 22,26 was reduced because the molecules of coating 32 predominantly bond with the valleys and indentations in the blades.
  • Of course, it should be recognized that scissors 10 are described above by way of example only as having a coating applied by reactive magnetron sputtering and CAP processes. Any thin film forming method such as chemical vapor deposition, physical vapor deposition, thermal spraying and sintering after a dip coating may be employed for providing coating 32 to scissors 10. Preferably, the method of forming coating 32 has a maximum temperature sufficient to not soften or affect the heat- treatment of the uncoated blades.
  • It should also be recognized that coating 32 has been described above by way of example only as finding use with a cutting implement in the form of scissors 10. Of course, coating 32 can provide the aforementioned benefits to other stationery cutting implements. For example, Figures 6 to 9 illustrate alternate exemplary embodiments of cutting implements, which have a coating.
  • An exemplary embodiment of a cutting implement in the form of a rotary style paper trimmer 110 is illustrated in Figures 6 and 7. Rotary style paper trimmer 110 is as shown and described in U. S. Provisional Application Serial No. 60/421,581 filed on October 28,2002 , the contents of which are incorporated herein by reference.
  • Trimmer 110 has a base 112 and a rotary cutting mechanism 114. Base 112 has a rail 116 and a cutting blade or anvil 118. Rotary cutting mechanism 114 has a circular cutting blade 120 disposed in a housing 122. Housing 122 is slideably received on rail 116.
  • Blade 120 is disposed in housing 122 opposite blade 118 as illustrated in Figure 7. Blade 120 has a cutting edge 124 formed at its outer periphery, while blade 118 has a corresponding cutting edge 126. Rotary cutting mechanism 114 is also movably received on rail 116 such that cutting edges 124,126 can be moved into contact with one another. Accordingly, trimmer 110 has a pair of complementary cutting blades 118, 120.
  • During use of trimmer 110, a piece of paper 128 is positioned between cutting edges 124,126. Rotary cutting mechanism 114 is moved such that cutting edge 124 is contact with cutting edge 126. Then, rotary cutting mechanism 114 is slid along rail 116 such that the interaction of cutting edge 124 on cutting edge 126 severs paper 128 disposed therebetween.
  • Blades 118, 120 are preferably made of steel, more preferably stainless steel, such as 420 stainless steel. In addition, blades 118,120 can be heat-treated to further increase the hardness of the complementary cutting blades.
  • Trimmer 110 has a coating 132 disposed on blades 118,120. As described in detail above with respect to the exemplary embodiments of Figures 1 to 5, coating 132 has a thickness in a range between about 0.3 microns and 0.5 microns, more preferably about 0.4 microns.
  • Coating 132 provides the complementary cutting blades 118,120 with extremely tough, hard, wear resistant characteristics. This increased hardness provides trimmer 110 with substantially increased longevity, while also providing the trimmer with corrosion resistance, as well as providing a smooth and uniform appearance and color. Coating 132 provides trimmer 110 with an aesthetically acceptable color or appearance and reduces friction between the cutting blades during use.
  • Coating 132 can be made of titanium nitride (TiN), chromium nitride (CrN), or titanium chromium nitride (TiCrN). More preferably, coating 32 is a multiple component barrier of titanium chromium nitride.
  • Coating 132 having the desired hardness, smoothness, and diffusion barrier properties preferably is formed of titanium chromium nitride having about 35 percent by weight of titanium nitride and about 65 percent by weight of chromium nitride and with a hardness in a range of about 5.7 to about 9.1 gigapascals. More preferably, coating 32 has about 50 percent by weight of titanium nitride and about 50 percent by weight of chromium nitride and a hardness in a range of about 7.2 to about 7.6 gigapascals. Thus, coating 132 provides trimmer 110 with a visual indication that the coating had been applied, without affecting the consumer's impression of the target use of the scissors (i. e., general household use). Moreover, coating 132 provides trimmer 110 with drastically improved hardness over the uncoated trimmers.
  • An exemplary embodiment of a stationery cutting implement in the form of a guillotine style paper trimmer 210 is illustrated in Figures 8 and 9. Trimmer 210 is as shown and described in U. S. Provisional Application Serial No. 60/392,942 filed on July 1,2002 , the contents of which are incorporated herein by reference.
  • Trimmer 210 has a base 212 and a pivoting cutting mechanism 214. Base 212 has a fixed cutting blade 216. Pivoting cutting mechanism 214 has a movable cutting blade 220 pivotally secured to base 212 at a pivot point 218. Each blade 216,220 has a cutting edge 224. Accordingly, trimmer 210 has a pair of complementary cutting blades 216,220.
  • During use of trimmer 210, a piece of paper (not shown) is positioned on base 212 so that the portion to be cut is disposed between the cutting edges 224. Pivoting cutting mechanism 214 is moved about pivot point 218 in the direction of arrow 226 such that the cutting edges 224 shear the paper.
  • Cutting blades 216,220 are preferably made of steel, more preferably stainless steel, such as 420 stainless steel. In addition, cutting blades 216,220 can be heat-treated to further increase the hardness of the complementary cutting blades.
  • Trimmer 210 has a coating 232 disposed on cutting blades 216,220. Again, coating 232 has a thickness in a range between about 0.3 microns and 0.5 microns, more preferably about 0.4 microns.
  • Coating 232, like coating 132, provides the complementary cutting blades with extremely tough, hard, wear resistant characteristics. This increased hardness provides trimmer 210 with substantially increased longevity, while also providing the trimmer with corrosion resistance, as well as providing a smooth and uniform appearance and color. Coating 232 provides trimmer 210 with an aesthetically acceptable color or appearance and reduces friction between the cutting blades during use.
  • Coating 232, like coating 132, can be made of titanium nitride (TiN), chromium nitride (CrN), or titanium chromium nitride (TiCrN). More preferably, coating 232 is a multiple component barrier of titanium chromium nitride. Coating 232 is formed of titanium chromium nitride having about 35 percent by weight of titanium nitride and about 65 percent by weight of chromium nitride and with a hardness in a range of about 5.7 to about 9.1 gigapascals. More preferably, coating 232 has about 50 percent by weight of titanium nitride and about 50 percent by weight of chromium nitride and a hardness in a range of about 7.2 to about 7.6 gigapascals.
  • The coating described herein for stationery cutting implements provides a cost competitive manner to improve the hardness, longevity, stain resistance, and ease of use of the cutting implement. For example, it has been found that the coating of the present invention, when applied using the aforementioned CAP process, increases the cost of the cutting implement by about seventeen cents, or less than 30% of the cost of manufacture the implement.
  • It should also be noted that the terms "first", "second", and "third" and the like may be used herein to modify various elements. These modifiers do not imply a spatial, sequential, or hierarchical order to the modified elements unless specifically stated.
  • While the invention has been described with reference to one or more exemplary embodiments, it will be understood by those skilled in the art that various changes may be made and equivalents may be substituted for elements thereof without departing from the scope of the invention. In addition, many modifications may be made to adapt a particular situation or material to the teachings of the disclosure without departing from the essential scope thereof. Therefore, it is intended that the invention not be limited to the particular embodiment (s) disclosed as the best mode contemplated for carrying out this invention, but that the invention will include all embodiments falling within the scope of the appended claims.
  • The invention is further described in the following clauses:
    1. 1. A cutting implement comprising: a pair of complementary cutting blades, each having a cutting edge; and a coating disposed on each of said pair of complementary cutting blades, wherein said coating has titanium chromium nitride and provides said pair of complementary cutting blades with a satin silver appearance.
    2. 2. The cutting implement as in clause 1, wherein said coating has about 35 percent by weight of titanium nitride and about 65 percent by weight of chromium nitride
    3. 3. The cutting implement as in claim 2, wherein said coating has a hardness in a range of about 5.7 to about 9.1 gigapascals.
    4. 4. The cutting implement as in clause 2, wherein said coating has a thickness in a range between about 0.3 and 0.5 microns.
    5. 5. The cutting implement as in clause 1, wherein said coating has about 50 percent by weight of titanium nitride and about 50 percent by weight of chromium nitride.
    6. 6. The cutting implement as in clause 5, wherein said coating has a hardness in a range of about 7.2 to about 7.6 gigapascals.
    7. 7. The cutting implement as in clause 5, wherein said coating has a thickness of about 0.4 microns.
    8. 8. The cutting implement as in clause 1, wherein said coating provides each of said pair of cutting blades with a surface roughness in a range of about 15 to 25 10-6 inch/inch.
    9. 9. The cutting implement as in clause 1, wherein the cutting implement is selected from the group consisting of a pair of scissors, a rotary style paper trimmer, and a guillotine style paper trimmer.
    10. 10. The cutting implement as in clause 9, wherein each of said pair of cutting blades is formed of a material selected from the group consisting of steel, stainless steel, 420 stainless steel, heat-treated steel, heat treated stainless steel, and heat treated 420 stainless steel.
    11. 11. The cutting implement as in clause 10, wherein said coating is disposed on each of said pair of cutting blades such that the coating forms a metallurgical bond with the blades, said metallurgical bond resisting one ore more of flaking, blistering, chipping, and peeling.
    12. 12. The cutting implement as in clause 10, wherein said coating is adsorbed into a surface layer of each of said cutting blades.
    13. 13. A cutting implement comprising: a pair of complementary cutting blades ; and a titanium chromium nitride coating disposed on each of said pair of complementary said cutting blades, wherein said titanium chromium nitride coating has a thickness in a range between about 0.3 and 0.5 microns, a surface roughness in a range of about 15 to 25 10-6 inch/inch, and a hardness in a range of about 5.7 to about 9.1 gigapascals.
    14. 14. The cutting implement as in clause 13, wherein said coating comprises about 35 percent by weight of titanium nitride and about 65 percent by weight of chromium nitride.
    15. 15. The cutting implement as in clause 13, wherein said coating comprises about 50 percent by weight of titanium nitride and about 50 percent by weight of chromium nitride.
    16. 16. The cutting implement as in clause 15, wherein said coating has a thickness of about 0.4 microns.
    17. 17. The cutting implement as in clause 13, wherein said coating provides said pair of complementary cutting blades with a satin silver appearance.
    18. 18. The cutting implement as in clause 13, wherein the cutting implement is selected from the group consisting of a pair of scissors, a rotary style paper trimmer, and a guillotine style paper trimmer.
    19. 19. The pair of complementary cutting surfaces as in clause 13, wherein said pair of complementary cutting blades is formed of a material selected from the group consisting of steel, stainless steel, 420 stainless steel, heat-treated steel, heat treated stainless steel, and heat treated 420 stainless steel.

Claims (12)

  1. A cutting implement (10) comprising:
    a pair of complementary cutting blades (22, 26), each having a cutting edge (28), characterized in that
    each of said pair of complementary cutting blades (22, 26) has a coating disposed thereon, wherein said coating has less than or equal to about 50% by weight of titanium nitride and greater than or equal to about 50% by weight of chromium nitride.
  2. The cutting implement according to Claim 1, wherein the coating provides the cutting blades (22, 26) with a satin silver appearance.
  3. The cutting implement according to Claim 1 or Claim 2, wherein the coating is applied to the blades (22, 26) by a process selected from the group consisting of chemical vapor deposition, physical vapor deposition, reactive magnetron sputtering, and cathode arc plasma.
  4. The cutting implement according to any previous claim, wherein the cutting implement (10) is selected from the group consisting of a pair of scissors, a rotary style paper trimmer, and a guillotine paper trimmer.
  5. The cutting implement according to any previous claim, wherein the coating has a thickness less than about 0.6 microns.
  6. The cutting implement according to any previous claim, wherein the coating further comprises titanium chromium nitride.
  7. The cutting implement according to any previous claim, wherein the coating has a thickness in a range between 0.3 and 0.5 microns.
  8. The cutting implement according to any previous claim, wherein the coating includes titanium nitride in a range of about 50% by weight to about 10% by weight and includes chromium nitride in a range of about 50% by weight to about 90% by weight.
  9. The cutting implement according to any of Claims 1 to 7, wherein the coating has about 50 percent by weight of titanium nitride and about 50 percent by weight chromium nitride.
  10. The cutting implement according to any of Claims 1 to 7, wherein the coating is has about 25 percent by weight of titanium nitride and about 75 percent by weight chromium nitride.
  11. The cutting implement according to any of Claims 1 to 7, wherein the coating has about 10 percent by weight of titanium nitride and about 90 percent by weight chromium nitride.
  12. The cutting implement according to any of Claims 1 to 7, wherein the by weight percentage of chromium nitride is greater than or equal to about twice the by weight percentage of titanium nitride.
EP08000011A 2001-11-13 2002-11-13 Coating for stationery cutting implements Expired - Lifetime EP1916076B1 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US33857501P 2001-11-13 2001-11-13
EP02782295A EP1453642B1 (en) 2001-11-13 2002-11-13 Coating for stationery cutting implements

Related Parent Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP02782295A Division EP1453642B1 (en) 2001-11-13 2002-11-13 Coating for stationery cutting implements

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP1916076A1 true EP1916076A1 (en) 2008-04-30
EP1916076B1 EP1916076B1 (en) 2012-08-22

Family

ID=39212275

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP08000011A Expired - Lifetime EP1916076B1 (en) 2001-11-13 2002-11-13 Coating for stationery cutting implements

Country Status (1)

Country Link
EP (1) EP1916076B1 (en)

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20150128423A1 (en) * 2013-11-08 2015-05-14 BNR Development, LLC Scissors apparatus for special snipping

Citations (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4436830A (en) * 1981-03-02 1984-03-13 Andreev Anatoly A Coating for metal-cutting tools
DE3447962A1 (en) * 1984-03-30 1985-11-21 Fritz Bracht GmbH & Co KG, 5650 Solingen Single-handed scissors made of metal, especially hair-cutting scissors
US4981756A (en) * 1989-03-21 1991-01-01 Vac-Tec Systems, Inc. Method for coated surgical instruments and tools
US5152774A (en) * 1988-10-17 1992-10-06 Schroeder William A Surgical instrument having a toughened wearing surface and method of making the same
US5301431A (en) * 1992-12-01 1994-04-12 Etm Corporation Hand-held cutting tool
US5528833A (en) * 1994-04-19 1996-06-25 Kabushiki Kaisha Sangi Scissors with ceramic coated replaceable cutting blades

Patent Citations (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4436830A (en) * 1981-03-02 1984-03-13 Andreev Anatoly A Coating for metal-cutting tools
DE3447962A1 (en) * 1984-03-30 1985-11-21 Fritz Bracht GmbH & Co KG, 5650 Solingen Single-handed scissors made of metal, especially hair-cutting scissors
US5152774A (en) * 1988-10-17 1992-10-06 Schroeder William A Surgical instrument having a toughened wearing surface and method of making the same
US4981756A (en) * 1989-03-21 1991-01-01 Vac-Tec Systems, Inc. Method for coated surgical instruments and tools
US5301431A (en) * 1992-12-01 1994-04-12 Etm Corporation Hand-held cutting tool
US5528833A (en) * 1994-04-19 1996-06-25 Kabushiki Kaisha Sangi Scissors with ceramic coated replaceable cutting blades

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20150128423A1 (en) * 2013-11-08 2015-05-14 BNR Development, LLC Scissors apparatus for special snipping

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
EP1916076B1 (en) 2012-08-22

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US8245407B2 (en) Coating for cutting implements
US7913402B2 (en) Coating for cutting implements
Knotek et al. Industrial deposition of binary, ternary, and quaternary nitrides of titanium, zirconium, and aluminum
EP1287953B1 (en) Cutting blade and method of producing the same
US20050064214A1 (en) Metal strip product
CA2736807C (en) Coating for cutting implements
US9464355B2 (en) Colored rigid decorative member
EP3828311A1 (en) Razor blade coating
US10766153B2 (en) Cutting instrument, coating and method
Guo et al. Comparison of microstructures and properties of VN and VN/Ag nanocomposite films fabricated by pulsed laser deposition
US20060137971A1 (en) Method for coating cutting implements
EP1916076B1 (en) Coating for stationery cutting implements
US20080178477A1 (en) Cutting Instrument
WO2015079505A1 (en) Hard lubricating coating film and hard lubricating coating film-covered tool
JPH01190386A (en) Cooking cutter
JP2006082191A (en) Surface coated cutting tool
WO2007056751A2 (en) Pencil-sharpening device
WO2023008188A1 (en) Coated tool and cutting tool
KR20240038353A (en) Ceramic coating method for knife
JP2009035784A (en) Oxide coating film, material coated with oxide coating film, and method for formation of oxide coating film
Navinšek Ni-Cr-Ti protective coating
JP2022035078A (en) White antibacterial member, production method of white antibacterial member, and watch containing white antibacterial member
Sullivan The effect of nitrogen addition on the characterization and oxidation behavior of titanium-aluminum-chromium coatings
JPS6340591A (en) Blade
JPH03232970A (en) Metallic product for ornament or cutting tool coated by chemical vapor deposition method and excellent in permanence of corrosion resistance and attractive appearance

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20080102

AC Divisional application: reference to earlier application

Ref document number: 1453642

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: P

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): DE FR GB

17Q First examination report despatched

Effective date: 20080708

AKX Designation fees paid

Designated state(s): DE FR GB

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R079

Ref document number: 60243577

Country of ref document: DE

Free format text: PREVIOUS MAIN CLASS: B26D0001000000

Ipc: B26B0013000000

GRAP Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1

RIC1 Information provided on ipc code assigned before grant

Ipc: C23C 30/00 20060101ALI20120216BHEP

Ipc: C23C 14/06 20060101ALI20120216BHEP

Ipc: B26B 25/00 20060101ALI20120216BHEP

Ipc: B26D 1/00 20060101ALI20120216BHEP

Ipc: B26B 13/00 20060101AFI20120216BHEP

GRAS Grant fee paid

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

AC Divisional application: reference to earlier application

Ref document number: 1453642

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: P

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): DE FR GB

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R096

Ref document number: 60243577

Country of ref document: DE

Effective date: 20121018

PLBE No opposition filed within time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT

26N No opposition filed

Effective date: 20130523

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R097

Ref document number: 60243577

Country of ref document: DE

Effective date: 20130523

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: PLFP

Year of fee payment: 14

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: PLFP

Year of fee payment: 15

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: PLFP

Year of fee payment: 16

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Payment date: 20211124

Year of fee payment: 20

Ref country code: GB

Payment date: 20211129

Year of fee payment: 20

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 20211126

Year of fee payment: 20

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R071

Ref document number: 60243577

Country of ref document: DE

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: PE20

Expiry date: 20221112

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF EXPIRATION OF PROTECTION

Effective date: 20221112