EP1957760A2 - Verfahren und vorrichtung zur steuerung eines computergestützten rechenverfahrens in einer technischen anlage - Google Patents
Verfahren und vorrichtung zur steuerung eines computergestützten rechenverfahrens in einer technischen anlageInfo
- Publication number
- EP1957760A2 EP1957760A2 EP06807111A EP06807111A EP1957760A2 EP 1957760 A2 EP1957760 A2 EP 1957760A2 EP 06807111 A EP06807111 A EP 06807111A EP 06807111 A EP06807111 A EP 06807111A EP 1957760 A2 EP1957760 A2 EP 1957760A2
- Authority
- EP
- European Patent Office
- Prior art keywords
- data
- computer
- server
- client
- application
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Granted
Links
Classifications
-
- F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
- F01—MACHINES OR ENGINES IN GENERAL; ENGINE PLANTS IN GENERAL; STEAM ENGINES
- F01K—STEAM ENGINE PLANTS; STEAM ACCUMULATORS; ENGINE PLANTS NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR; ENGINES USING SPECIAL WORKING FLUIDS OR CYCLES
- F01K13/00—General layout or general methods of operation of complete plants
- F01K13/02—Controlling, e.g. stopping or starting
Definitions
- the invention relates to a method for controlling a computer-aided computing method in a technical system which permits interactive network-based use.
- the invention further relates to a device which is particularly suitable for carrying out the method. Drive the Ver ⁇ and the device should in particular as a diagnostic ⁇ system of a power plant used to be.
- the acquired data are passed on to further processing, for example, for an analysis or simulation of various scenarios.
- computing methods are used whose interactive use via a network-based user interface is undesirable or technically limited.
- One of the reasons for this is the high safety risk involved a 7-8ba ⁇ catalyzed use because sensitive data can be intentionally unintentionally changed inadmissible or by example, other network users.
- Another reason for this is that complex computing methods are often not intended for a network application in which, for example, multiple clients retrieve services from a server performing the computation.
- computational methods which are used in particular for simulating or analyzing are used, a lot of computing time, so that the usual network-based user interfaces do not accept this waiting time.
- the calculation method is installed on a single system, such as a workstation to the operator.
- the calculation method can be used directly by the operator. This is the case, for example, with software in which the operator receives the software directly and can use it directly with the aid of a license key or a dongle.
- the object of the invention is therefore to provide a method for controlling a computer-aided computing method in a technical system, which allows an interactive netzba ⁇ - based use with significantly increased performance.
- a further object is the specification of a device which is particularly suitable for carrying out the method. The method and the device should be usable in a power plant, in particular as Diag ⁇ nosesystem.
- the object relating to the method this object is achieved by a method for controlling a computerized calculation method in an industrial plant, wel ⁇ ches is designed for an interactive network-based usage, is so carried out an input of data by means of the interactive network-based service, said data ⁇ at least partially in the computer-aided calculation methods are utilized, and wherein an active influencing of the interactive operation of the computer-aided calculation methods and vice versa ⁇ is avoided by decoupling the interactive network-based operation and the computerized calculation method. Therefore, the basic principle of the invention is that a decoupling of the interactive network-based operation, ie essentially the input of data and the output of result data, and the actual processing of the data takes place.
- An essential advantage of the method is that the computer-integrated computational process, for example, a complex computerge ⁇ aided analysis or simulation method, can be controlled by interactive operation via a network interface. This means that many, including complex arithmetic Enver ⁇ continue now with interactive network-based operation insertion bar are. As a result, the computer-aided calculation method no longer has to be delivered to every user; rather, several users can access one and the same calculation method. This simplifies the maintainability of computerge ⁇ aided calculation method significantly, for example in case of any errors or even with updates that can now be performed centrally.
- Another significant advantage is that the computer-aided calculation method can now be used by many operators at the same time (multi-user capability). This is an advantage in particular when many operators want to use the calculation method, but the individual operators only use the computer-aided computing method in their capacity to a relatively small extent.
- Another advantage is that, despite this decoupling, the operator of the interactive network-based operation still has the impression that he himself controls the processing of the computer-aided computing method. By this Ent ⁇ coupling but it only controls the input of the input data and the output of the result data by means of the interactive network-based operation. The operator himself has no access to the computer-aided calculation method itself, where ⁇ is reduced by the security risk when using sensitive data in the calculation method. Decoupling will continue to increase the security risk of transmission of sensitive data. ler, that is, risky data, reduced. Therefore an Leis ⁇ tung increase results primarily in terms of safety, maintenance and multi-user capability.
- the interactive network-based operation is done by one or more operators.
- This is particularly geous ago ⁇ when operators at different locations on different computing systems such as personal computers, access to the computer-aided calculation methods by the interactive network-based operation.
- This is on the one hand a cost advantage, since the computer-aided Re ⁇ chenmaschine is delivered only once, on the other hand it increases the maintainability (for example, in updates), which must be performed only once and, for example, online by the distributor or a system administrator can be performed ,
- the simultaneous access of several operators to the computer-aided calculation method is made possible. Due to the simultaneous access unnecessary waiting times are avoided. A further advantage results from the fact that several invoices are simul- can be started at night and can be processed overnight.
- a diagnosis at least ei ⁇ nes part of the technical installation is effected preferably by the computer-aided calculation methods in / on the technical system (T). Diagnostic procedures are constantly required, especially with regard to changing operating data in the technical system. Furthermore, here sensitive, that is, the technical system concerned, processed data. Due to the large amount of data, these are mostly also complex procedures.
- the measuring system can also be connected directly to the active network-based operation coupled, so that no direct manual input of the data is more necessary.
- a device for controlling a computerized calculation method in an industrial plant, wel ⁇ ches is designed for an interactive network-based use, comprising a client, a server, a data memory, a controller and an application, wherein the client is connected to the server for data exchange, the server for
- Data exchange with the data memory is connected to the data exchange with the controller, and the controller is connected to the data exchange with the application and wherein the data memory is designed so that an active influence of the client on the application and vice versa is avoided.
- the device is particularly suitable for carrying out the method described above. The advantages of the method therefore also arise for the device.
- the data exchange between client, server, data storage, controller and application is entirely or at least partially provided wirelessly.
- the data transmission can take place, for example, by means of WLAN (Wireless Local Area Network).
- WLAN Wireless Local Area Network
- the client through the Internet / Intranet with the Ser ⁇ is connected ver.
- the advantage here is that the supplier of the application, usually the manufacturer, the application does not have to give out of hand, but can sell services with the application. This is particularly important if sensitive data is included in the calculation process and the risk of unintentional disclosure of this data exists.
- the data memory is preferably a passive data memory. This allows the datastore to execute commands from the controller or the server, but not active commands Give the controller or server, that is, do no actions in the controller or server.
- one or more clients are connected to one or more servers which are connected to the database.
- the reliable application of the application is increased because a failure of a client or a server does not prevent the application of the application by the other operators.
- the data memory is provided on a physically independent data server.
- the data server can be designed such that it is only coupled to the server via a network connection. By special software-side configuration, this can for example have an increase in access time result.
- the client, the server, the data storage, the controller and the application are provided on a computer system. This is particularly advantageous when the application is mainly used by an operator, or when the computing system is provided exclusively at a certain place (for example, a measuring room).
- the client, the server, the data storage, the controller and the application are provided on physically independent computer systems.
- the reliability of the application is increased as an off ⁇ case of the client not imply a failure of the application signified ⁇ .
- client, server, data storage, controller and application on one or more physical or virtual (different Partitio ⁇ nen, hard disks) different computer systems are possible.
- the technical system is a power plant.
- this device can be used as a diagnostic ⁇ device. Further advantageous embodiments of the invention will become apparent from the description. In the following the invention will be explained by way of example with reference to a drawing.
- FIG 1 would be a device for controlling a computerge ⁇ assisted calculation process in a technical arrival
- FIG. 2 shows a method for controlling a computer-aided computing method in a technical system.
- FIG. 1 shows a schematic arrangement of a device for controlling a computer-aided computing method in a technical system (T).
- a client (C) which is designed, for example, as a web browser for displaying the user interface to be controlled interactively.
- the client (C) is exchange coupled to a server (W) to the DATAOUT ⁇ .
- the server (W) is configured, for example, as a web server.
- the server (W) is provided with a rather spei- (S), advantageously a database connected to the exchange ⁇ DATAOUT.
- the data memory (S) in turn is connected for data exchange with a controller (L) which is connected to an application (A).
- the controller (L) is advantageously a control program for activating the application (A).
- the application (A) advantageously represents the computer-aided calculation method.
- the device is integrated on or in a technical system (T). In this case, measuring devices (not shown) are preferably connected to the device, which supply the data for carrying out
- FIG. 2 shows a method for controlling a computer-aided computing method in a technical system (T). shown. This can be roughly divided into two parts A and B ⁇ .
- Part A essentially comprises the steps 1-8, which are briefly described below.
- the client (C) sends a request to the server (W) that he wants to use the application (A).
- the server (W) then sends in step 2 a form, such as an interactive user interface, for inputting the data to the client (C).
- the input of the data may be done by an operator, manually or automatically by means of a program which receives data through a measuring device.
- the client (C) returns the form with the input data to the server (W).
- the server (W) generates a data record from the input data, which it provides with a special marking. From this mark it can be seen that this record contains only input data.
- the server (W) sends this data record to the data memory (S), step 4.
- step 4 sends the server (W) to the client (C) a Bestä ⁇ actuation of the receipt of the input data, and activates a timer by one, based on the input data and editing the data by the application (A), Waiting time on the client (C).
- the expiry of the waiting time is advantageously displayed on the operating surface of the client (C) by a message, for example a progress bar.
- the processing of the input data is described in Part B.
- the client (C) starts a request to the server (W) for the result data pertaining to the input data, step 5.
- the server (W) requests data storage (S ) to the data associated with the input data, step 6.
- the data memory (S) sends in step 7 the record to the server (W).
- the server (W) checks the marking of the data record. If the flag indicating that the data set contains only input data is returned to step 4 in step 8 and the timer is reactivated. Shows the mark that the record results- contains data, then sends the server (W) in step 8 to the client (C) and disables the timer.
- the processing of the application (A), for example, the computer-aided calculation method, with the input data for example, the computer-aided calculation method, with the input data.
- the controller is requesting (L) from the data memory (S) in egg nem step 31, a data record, which contains a flag indicating that this record only contains entranc ⁇ be songs. If no such data record is present in the data memory (S), it returns to step 31 in a step 32. This can be done immediately or after a pre-set waiting time. If such a data record is present in the data memory (S), then this is transferred to the controller (L) in step 32.
- the controller (L) transfers the received data record of the application (A).
- the application (A) executes the function desired by the operator with the inputs received.
- the application (A) sends the results to the controller (L).
- the controller (L) supplements or replaces the previously only input data-containing data record in the data memory (S), step 35. Furthermore, it changes the marking of the data record in such a way that now the marker indicates the presence of result data.
- the controller (L) then executes step 31 again.
- a significant advantage of this method is the decoupling of the client (C), ie, in principle, the operator of the actual processing of the desired application by the user (A). This is done by having the data store (S) is designed, so to speak, as a passive element, that is, it is not able to trigger actions on the controller (L) or the server (W), but stores or delivers only data according to a command directed to it. Furthermore, the different markers in the input and result data set reduce the security risk in transmitting sensitive, that is, risky data.
- the application (A) for example, complicated computer-aided calculation methods, can be controlled with interactive operation via a network interface and thus the application (A) no longer needs to be delivered to each user.
Abstract
Description
Claims
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
EP06807111.7A EP1957760B1 (de) | 2005-10-12 | 2006-10-10 | Verfahren und vorrichtung zur steuerung eines computergestützten rechenverfahrens in einer technischen anlage |
Applications Claiming Priority (3)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
EP05022275A EP1777381A1 (de) | 2005-10-12 | 2005-10-12 | Verfahren und Vorrichtung zur Steuerung eines computergestützten Rechenverfahrens in einer technischen Anlage |
PCT/EP2006/067226 WO2007042513A2 (de) | 2005-10-12 | 2006-10-10 | Verfahren und vorrichtung zur steuerung eines computergestützten rechenverfahrens in einer technischen anlage |
EP06807111.7A EP1957760B1 (de) | 2005-10-12 | 2006-10-10 | Verfahren und vorrichtung zur steuerung eines computergestützten rechenverfahrens in einer technischen anlage |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
EP1957760A2 true EP1957760A2 (de) | 2008-08-20 |
EP1957760B1 EP1957760B1 (de) | 2016-03-30 |
Family
ID=36408008
Family Applications (2)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
EP05022275A Withdrawn EP1777381A1 (de) | 2005-10-12 | 2005-10-12 | Verfahren und Vorrichtung zur Steuerung eines computergestützten Rechenverfahrens in einer technischen Anlage |
EP06807111.7A Not-in-force EP1957760B1 (de) | 2005-10-12 | 2006-10-10 | Verfahren und vorrichtung zur steuerung eines computergestützten rechenverfahrens in einer technischen anlage |
Family Applications Before (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
EP05022275A Withdrawn EP1777381A1 (de) | 2005-10-12 | 2005-10-12 | Verfahren und Vorrichtung zur Steuerung eines computergestützten Rechenverfahrens in einer technischen Anlage |
Country Status (5)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (1) | US8412353B2 (de) |
EP (2) | EP1777381A1 (de) |
ES (1) | ES2569931T3 (de) |
PL (1) | PL1957760T3 (de) |
WO (1) | WO2007042513A2 (de) |
Families Citing this family (5)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
WO2011146711A1 (en) * | 2010-05-21 | 2011-11-24 | Hsbc Technologies Inc. | Account opening computer system architecture and process for implementing same |
US9275360B2 (en) | 2010-05-21 | 2016-03-01 | Hsbc Technology & Services (Usa) Inc. | Account opening flow configuration computer system and process for implementing same |
US8589213B2 (en) | 2010-10-21 | 2013-11-19 | Hsbc Technology & Services (Usa) Inc. | Computer metrics system and process for implementing same |
US8843939B2 (en) | 2010-10-11 | 2014-09-23 | Hsbc Technology & Services (Usa) Inc. | Computer architecture and process for application processing engine |
WO2012058385A2 (en) | 2010-10-27 | 2012-05-03 | Hsbc Technlologies Inc. | Integrated customer communications computer system and process for implementing same |
Family Cites Families (21)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US5319574A (en) * | 1988-12-27 | 1994-06-07 | Fujitsu Limited | Status change monitoring apparatus |
US5373346A (en) * | 1991-06-13 | 1994-12-13 | Onset Computer Corp. | Data gathering computer and analysis display computer interface system and methodology |
FI114745B (fi) * | 1998-06-01 | 2004-12-15 | Metso Automation Oy | Kenttälaitteiden hallintajärjestelmä |
US6499001B1 (en) * | 2000-06-20 | 2002-12-24 | Lsi Logic Corporation | Engineering database feedback system |
JP2002004879A (ja) * | 2000-06-21 | 2002-01-09 | Mitsubishi Heavy Ind Ltd | 発電プラント統括運転指令システム |
US20030154055A1 (en) * | 2000-11-07 | 2003-08-14 | Kazuyoshi Yoshimura | System for measurement and display of environmental data |
JP3689767B2 (ja) * | 2000-09-22 | 2005-08-31 | 株式会社日立製作所 | 火力発電プラント保守サービス提供方法 |
US6973356B2 (en) * | 2001-04-23 | 2005-12-06 | Siemens Aktiengesellschaft | Method and assembly for operating and/or observing a device that monitors an industrial controller |
US6973410B2 (en) * | 2001-05-15 | 2005-12-06 | Chillergy Systems, Llc | Method and system for evaluating the efficiency of an air conditioning apparatus |
EP1286322A1 (de) * | 2001-08-07 | 2003-02-26 | Siemens Aktiengesellschaft | Simulationssystem, inbesondere für eine Kraftwerksanlage |
EP1345101A1 (de) * | 2002-03-08 | 2003-09-17 | Siemens Aktiengesellschaft | Diagnosesystem für mindestens eine technische Anlage |
US20030211451A1 (en) * | 2002-05-07 | 2003-11-13 | Cae Inc. | System and method for distance learning of systems knowledge and integrated procedures using a real-time, full-scope simulation |
US20040133416A1 (en) * | 2002-07-18 | 2004-07-08 | Norio Fukuoka | Information terminal device, method of acquiring information corresponding to language identification information from server and program thereof, network system, additional function purchasing progam, and program function adding method |
US7016742B2 (en) * | 2002-11-27 | 2006-03-21 | Bahelle Memorial Institute | Decision support for operations and maintenance (DSOM) system |
JP2004211587A (ja) * | 2002-12-27 | 2004-07-29 | Toshiba Corp | 発電プラントの運用支援システム |
DE10305363B4 (de) | 2003-02-10 | 2005-02-10 | Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft zur Förderung der angewandten Forschung e.V. | Netzwerkbasiertes Informationssystem und Verfahren zur zentralen Verwaltung und Aktualisierung von Datenobjekten mit zeitlich sich ändernden Inhalten |
US6862486B2 (en) * | 2003-03-04 | 2005-03-01 | Activplant Corporation | System and method for processing data relating to conditions in a manufacturing process |
ATE527587T1 (de) | 2003-08-13 | 2011-10-15 | Siemens Ag | Verfahren und vorrichtung zur mehrstufigen datenverarbeitung, insbesondere zur diagnose, in einer technischen anlage |
US7831704B2 (en) * | 2004-04-22 | 2010-11-09 | General Electric Company | Methods and systems for monitoring and diagnosing machinery |
US7346455B2 (en) * | 2004-05-25 | 2008-03-18 | Robbins & Myers Energy Systems L.P. | Wellbore evaluation system and method |
US7536276B2 (en) * | 2006-07-27 | 2009-05-19 | Siemens Buildings Technologies, Inc. | Method and apparatus for equipment health monitoring |
-
2005
- 2005-10-12 EP EP05022275A patent/EP1777381A1/de not_active Withdrawn
-
2006
- 2006-10-10 EP EP06807111.7A patent/EP1957760B1/de not_active Not-in-force
- 2006-10-10 ES ES06807111.7T patent/ES2569931T3/es active Active
- 2006-10-10 US US12/083,425 patent/US8412353B2/en active Active
- 2006-10-10 PL PL06807111.7T patent/PL1957760T3/pl unknown
- 2006-10-10 WO PCT/EP2006/067226 patent/WO2007042513A2/de active Application Filing
Non-Patent Citations (1)
Title |
---|
See references of WO2007042513A3 * |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
EP1777381A1 (de) | 2007-04-25 |
ES2569931T3 (es) | 2016-05-13 |
EP1957760B1 (de) | 2016-03-30 |
PL1957760T3 (pl) | 2016-10-31 |
WO2007042513A2 (de) | 2007-04-19 |
US8412353B2 (en) | 2013-04-02 |
WO2007042513A3 (de) | 2008-08-21 |
US20090234466A1 (en) | 2009-09-17 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
DE112004001775T5 (de) | Verfahren und Vorrichtung zur Bereitstellung von automatischen Software-Updates | |
EP1288757A1 (de) | Verfahren und Prozessleitsystem zum Betrieb einer technischen Anlage | |
EP0829046B1 (de) | Setup-verfahren und setup-system für benutzerprogramme, sowie benutzerrechner in einem rechnernetz | |
DE102007046572A1 (de) | Flexible Eingabe-/Ausgabegeräte zur Verwendung in Prozesssteuerungssystemen | |
DE10021698A1 (de) | Auf einem einzelnen Computer realisierte integrierende Funktionalität für ein verteiltes Prozessregelsystem | |
EP2042956A2 (de) | Schnittstelle zwischen einem Fertigungsmanagementsystem und einem Automatisierungssystem | |
EP1957760B1 (de) | Verfahren und vorrichtung zur steuerung eines computergestützten rechenverfahrens in einer technischen anlage | |
EP1296207B1 (de) | HMI Gerät und Verfahren zur Bedienung einer technischen Einrichtung, Automatisierungssystem mit HMI Gerät und Computerprogrammprodukt mit Programm zur Durchführung des Verfahrens in einem HMI Gerät oder Automatisierungssystem | |
DE19911824C2 (de) | Schaltschranküberwachungsanlage | |
EP2422248B1 (de) | System und verfahren zum verteilen von projektdaten einer sicherheitssteuerung einer automatisierten anlage auf die steuerungskomponenten | |
EP3948446A1 (de) | Generierung und verteilung von konfigurations-datenstrukturen für steuerungssysteme | |
EP1483638B1 (de) | Diagnosesystem für mindestens eine technische anlage | |
EP3985532B1 (de) | Zertifikatsmanagement für technische anlagen | |
EP1463981A2 (de) | Verfahren zum instandhalten einer fabrikationsanlage | |
WO2005106602A1 (de) | Anordnung und verfahren zum betreiben einer technischen anlage | |
DE10353052A1 (de) | Automatisierungsanlage mit untereinander kommunizierenden Komponenten | |
WO2003014849A1 (de) | Prozessleitsystem mit taxierfunktion | |
EP2329374A1 (de) | Testmodul und verfahren zum testen einer o/r-abbildungs-middleware | |
EP2224340A1 (de) | Verfahren und Managementsystem zum Konfigurieren eines dynamischen Informationssystems sowie Computerprogrammprodukt | |
EP1374000B1 (de) | Verfahren und anordnung zur bedienung und/oder beobachtung der eine anlagen-steuerung uberwachenden einrichtung | |
WO2005081078A1 (de) | Verfahren und system zum bereitstellen von einstellwerten für elektrische geräte einer automatisierungsanlage | |
WO2008000009A1 (de) | Verfahren und vorrichtung zum betreiben einer prüffabrik | |
EP1165263B1 (de) | Leitsystem für ein walzwerk, insbesondere für eine walzstrasse | |
EP1860514B1 (de) | Anordnung mit mindestens zwei über Kommunikationsmittel verbundenen Automatisierungsgeräten | |
EP4246326A1 (de) | Verfahren, vorrichtung und systemanordnung zur prozessüberwachung in echtzeit |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
PUAI | Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012 |
|
17P | Request for examination filed |
Effective date: 20080407 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: A2 Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC NL PL PT RO SE SI SK TR |
|
AX | Request for extension of the european patent |
Extension state: AL BA HR MK RS |
|
R17D | Deferred search report published (corrected) |
Effective date: 20080821 |
|
DAX | Request for extension of the european patent (deleted) | ||
RAP1 | Party data changed (applicant data changed or rights of an application transferred) |
Owner name: SIEMENS AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT |
|
GRAP | Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1 |
|
INTG | Intention to grant announced |
Effective date: 20151015 |
|
GRAS | Grant fee paid |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3 |
|
GRAA | (expected) grant |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: B1 Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC NL PL PT RO SE SI SK TR |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: GB Ref legal event code: FG4D Free format text: NOT ENGLISH |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: EP |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: AT Ref legal event code: REF Ref document number: 785647 Country of ref document: AT Kind code of ref document: T Effective date: 20160415 Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: NV Representative=s name: SIEMENS SCHWEIZ AG, CH |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: IE Ref legal event code: FG4D Free format text: LANGUAGE OF EP DOCUMENT: GERMAN |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R096 Ref document number: 502006014853 Country of ref document: DE |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: ES Ref legal event code: FG2A Ref document number: 2569931 Country of ref document: ES Kind code of ref document: T3 Effective date: 20160513 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: LT Ref legal event code: MG4D |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: GR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20160701 Ref country code: FI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20160330 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: NL Ref legal event code: MP Effective date: 20160330 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: SE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20160330 Ref country code: LV Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20160330 Ref country code: LT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20160330 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: NL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20160330 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: FR Ref legal event code: PLFP Year of fee payment: 11 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: IS Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20160730 Ref country code: EE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20160330 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: SK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20160330 Ref country code: CZ Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20160330 Ref country code: PT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20160801 Ref country code: RO Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20160330 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: TR Payment date: 20160929 Year of fee payment: 11 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R097 Ref document number: 502006014853 Country of ref document: DE |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: DK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20160330 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: FR Payment date: 20161028 Year of fee payment: 11 |
|
PLBE | No opposition filed within time limit |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261 |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: BE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20161031 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: PL Payment date: 20161010 Year of fee payment: 11 Ref country code: IT Payment date: 20161027 Year of fee payment: 11 Ref country code: AT Payment date: 20160908 Year of fee payment: 11 |
|
26N | No opposition filed |
Effective date: 20170103 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: SI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20160330 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: PL |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: IE Ref legal event code: MM4A |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: CH Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20161031 Ref country code: LI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20161031 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: LU Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20161010 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: IE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20161010 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: BE Ref legal event code: MM Effective date: 20161031 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: CY Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20160330 Ref country code: ES Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20171011 Ref country code: HU Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT; INVALID AB INITIO Effective date: 20061010 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: AT Ref legal event code: MM01 Ref document number: 785647 Country of ref document: AT Kind code of ref document: T Effective date: 20171010 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: MC Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20160330 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: FR Ref legal event code: ST Effective date: 20180629 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: BG Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20160330 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: AT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20171010 Ref country code: FR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20171031 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: IT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20171010 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: ES Ref legal event code: FD2A Effective date: 20181128 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: ES Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20161011 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: PL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20171010 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: GB Payment date: 20201102 Year of fee payment: 15 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: DE Payment date: 20201218 Year of fee payment: 15 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R119 Ref document number: 502006014853 Country of ref document: DE |
|
GBPC | Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee |
Effective date: 20211010 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: TR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20171010 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: GB Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20211010 Ref country code: DE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20220503 |