EP2259250A1 - Hybrid active noise reduction device for reducing environmental noise, method for determining an operational parameter of a hybrid active noise reduction device, and program element - Google Patents

Hybrid active noise reduction device for reducing environmental noise, method for determining an operational parameter of a hybrid active noise reduction device, and program element Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP2259250A1
EP2259250A1 EP09161866A EP09161866A EP2259250A1 EP 2259250 A1 EP2259250 A1 EP 2259250A1 EP 09161866 A EP09161866 A EP 09161866A EP 09161866 A EP09161866 A EP 09161866A EP 2259250 A1 EP2259250 A1 EP 2259250A1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
signal
operational parameter
analog
digital
filter part
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Withdrawn
Application number
EP09161866A
Other languages
German (de)
French (fr)
Inventor
Temujin Gautama
Simon Doclo
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
NXP BV
Original Assignee
NXP BV
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by NXP BV filed Critical NXP BV
Priority to EP09161866A priority Critical patent/EP2259250A1/en
Priority to PCT/IB2010/052475 priority patent/WO2010140133A2/en
Publication of EP2259250A1 publication Critical patent/EP2259250A1/en
Withdrawn legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G10MUSICAL INSTRUMENTS; ACOUSTICS
    • G10KSOUND-PRODUCING DEVICES; METHODS OR DEVICES FOR PROTECTING AGAINST, OR FOR DAMPING, NOISE OR OTHER ACOUSTIC WAVES IN GENERAL; ACOUSTICS NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G10K11/00Methods or devices for transmitting, conducting or directing sound in general; Methods or devices for protecting against, or for damping, noise or other acoustic waves in general
    • G10K11/16Methods or devices for protecting against, or for damping, noise or other acoustic waves in general
    • G10K11/175Methods or devices for protecting against, or for damping, noise or other acoustic waves in general using interference effects; Masking sound
    • G10K11/178Methods or devices for protecting against, or for damping, noise or other acoustic waves in general using interference effects; Masking sound by electro-acoustically regenerating the original acoustic waves in anti-phase
    • G10K11/1785Methods, e.g. algorithms; Devices
    • G10K11/17855Methods, e.g. algorithms; Devices for improving speed or power requirements
    • GPHYSICS
    • G10MUSICAL INSTRUMENTS; ACOUSTICS
    • G10KSOUND-PRODUCING DEVICES; METHODS OR DEVICES FOR PROTECTING AGAINST, OR FOR DAMPING, NOISE OR OTHER ACOUSTIC WAVES IN GENERAL; ACOUSTICS NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G10K11/00Methods or devices for transmitting, conducting or directing sound in general; Methods or devices for protecting against, or for damping, noise or other acoustic waves in general
    • G10K11/16Methods or devices for protecting against, or for damping, noise or other acoustic waves in general
    • G10K11/175Methods or devices for protecting against, or for damping, noise or other acoustic waves in general using interference effects; Masking sound
    • G10K11/178Methods or devices for protecting against, or for damping, noise or other acoustic waves in general using interference effects; Masking sound by electro-acoustically regenerating the original acoustic waves in anti-phase
    • G10K11/1781Methods or devices for protecting against, or for damping, noise or other acoustic waves in general using interference effects; Masking sound by electro-acoustically regenerating the original acoustic waves in anti-phase characterised by the analysis of input or output signals, e.g. frequency range, modes, transfer functions
    • G10K11/17821Methods or devices for protecting against, or for damping, noise or other acoustic waves in general using interference effects; Masking sound by electro-acoustically regenerating the original acoustic waves in anti-phase characterised by the analysis of input or output signals, e.g. frequency range, modes, transfer functions characterised by the analysis of the input signals only
    • G10K11/17823Reference signals, e.g. ambient acoustic environment
    • GPHYSICS
    • G10MUSICAL INSTRUMENTS; ACOUSTICS
    • G10KSOUND-PRODUCING DEVICES; METHODS OR DEVICES FOR PROTECTING AGAINST, OR FOR DAMPING, NOISE OR OTHER ACOUSTIC WAVES IN GENERAL; ACOUSTICS NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G10K11/00Methods or devices for transmitting, conducting or directing sound in general; Methods or devices for protecting against, or for damping, noise or other acoustic waves in general
    • G10K11/16Methods or devices for protecting against, or for damping, noise or other acoustic waves in general
    • G10K11/175Methods or devices for protecting against, or for damping, noise or other acoustic waves in general using interference effects; Masking sound
    • G10K11/178Methods or devices for protecting against, or for damping, noise or other acoustic waves in general using interference effects; Masking sound by electro-acoustically regenerating the original acoustic waves in anti-phase
    • G10K11/1785Methods, e.g. algorithms; Devices
    • G10K11/17857Geometric disposition, e.g. placement of microphones
    • GPHYSICS
    • G10MUSICAL INSTRUMENTS; ACOUSTICS
    • G10KSOUND-PRODUCING DEVICES; METHODS OR DEVICES FOR PROTECTING AGAINST, OR FOR DAMPING, NOISE OR OTHER ACOUSTIC WAVES IN GENERAL; ACOUSTICS NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G10K11/00Methods or devices for transmitting, conducting or directing sound in general; Methods or devices for protecting against, or for damping, noise or other acoustic waves in general
    • G10K11/16Methods or devices for protecting against, or for damping, noise or other acoustic waves in general
    • G10K11/175Methods or devices for protecting against, or for damping, noise or other acoustic waves in general using interference effects; Masking sound
    • G10K11/178Methods or devices for protecting against, or for damping, noise or other acoustic waves in general using interference effects; Masking sound by electro-acoustically regenerating the original acoustic waves in anti-phase
    • G10K11/1787General system configurations
    • G10K11/17879General system configurations using both a reference signal and an error signal
    • G10K11/17881General system configurations using both a reference signal and an error signal the reference signal being an acoustic signal, e.g. recorded with a microphone
    • GPHYSICS
    • G10MUSICAL INSTRUMENTS; ACOUSTICS
    • G10KSOUND-PRODUCING DEVICES; METHODS OR DEVICES FOR PROTECTING AGAINST, OR FOR DAMPING, NOISE OR OTHER ACOUSTIC WAVES IN GENERAL; ACOUSTICS NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G10K11/00Methods or devices for transmitting, conducting or directing sound in general; Methods or devices for protecting against, or for damping, noise or other acoustic waves in general
    • G10K11/16Methods or devices for protecting against, or for damping, noise or other acoustic waves in general
    • G10K11/175Methods or devices for protecting against, or for damping, noise or other acoustic waves in general using interference effects; Masking sound
    • G10K11/178Methods or devices for protecting against, or for damping, noise or other acoustic waves in general using interference effects; Masking sound by electro-acoustically regenerating the original acoustic waves in anti-phase
    • G10K11/1787General system configurations
    • G10K11/17885General system configurations additionally using a desired external signal, e.g. pass-through audio such as music or speech

Definitions

  • the invention relates to a hybrid active noise reduction device for reducing environmental noise.
  • the invention relates to a method for determining an operational parameter of a hybrid active noise reduction device.
  • the invention relates to a program element.
  • ANR Active noise reduction
  • An ANR device may comprise at least one microphone, a filter unit, and a loudspeaker.
  • the microphone receives a noise signal from the noisy environment of the person and transmits a microphone signal to the filter unit.
  • the filter unit performs a filtering operation on the microphone signal and transmits a noise reduction signal to the loudspeaker for further broadcast to the environment.
  • the noise reduction signal is in counter phase to the environmental noise such that the level of ambient noise perceived by the person is reduced, thereby enhancing the comfort of the person.
  • An ANR device may comprise a feedforward configuration or a feedback configuration, or a combination thereof, and may be implemented in a headset, in a hearing aid or in a car compartment.
  • the ANR device comprises a reference microphone which may be arranged in such a way that it mainly picks up the environmental noise from outside.
  • the noise reduction signal emitted by the loudspeaker is a filtered version of the reference microphone signal.
  • the filtering operation performed by the filter unit may be optimized by arranging an error microphone in such a way that the error microphone records ambient noise which a person perceives.
  • the filter unit may be optimized in that the sound level at the error microphone may be minimized.
  • a feedback ANR device uses only an error microphone arranged in such a way that the error microphone records ambient noise which a person may perceive.
  • the error microphone signal is filtered by the filter unit and is emitted by the loudspeaker.
  • the filter unit may also be optimized by minimizing the sound level at the error microphone.
  • the filter unit of an ANR device may comprise an analog filter and/or a digital filter.
  • An ANR device comprising an analog filter and a digital filter is known as a "hybrid" ANR device.
  • the use of an analog filter may allow for using the instantaneous analog filter response, whereas the use of a digital filter may enable a more complex signal filtering capability.
  • using a digital filter may introduce delays into the digital filter response which may result from analog-to-digital and digital-to-analog convertors being constructively indispensible in the signal processing path and being arranged upstream and downstream of the digital filter. In particular, these delays may force the digital filter response being zero in particular time intervals.
  • US 5,440,642 B1 discloses a digitally controlled hybrid ANR device in a feedback configuration which comprises a microphone, a filter unit, and a loudspeaker.
  • a microphone signal is filtered by the filter unit, and a filtered signal is transmitted to the loudspeaker.
  • the filter unit comprises an analog filter which is digitally controlled using a digital signal processor comprising a digital filter.
  • the analog filter and the digital filter are arranged in parallel to one another.
  • a hybrid active noise reduction device for reducing environmental noise for reducing environmental noise
  • a method for determining an operational parameter of a hybrid active noise reduction device for reducing environmental noise
  • a program element for determining an operational parameter of a hybrid active noise reduction device
  • a hybrid active noise reduction device for reducing environmental noise
  • the device comprising a microphone for receiving a noise signal and for transmitting a microphone signal, a filter unit for receiving the microphone signal and for transmitting a filtered microphone signal, the filter unit comprising an analog filter part and a digital filter part, the analog filter part and the digital filter part being arranged in series to one another, and a loudspeaker for transmitting a noise reduction signal based on the filtered microphone signal.
  • a headset comprising a hybrid active noise reduction device for reducing environmental noise.
  • a method for determining an operational parameter of a hybrid active noise reduction device comprising a microphone for receiving a noise signal and for transmitting a microphone signal, a filter unit for receiving the microphone signal and for transmitting a filtered microphone signal, the filter unit comprising an analog filter part and a digital filter part, and a loudspeaker for transmitting a noise reduction signal based on the filtered microphone signal, the method comprising selecting a first operational parameter of the device and determining a second operational parameter of the device based on the first operational parameter.
  • a program element which, when being executed by a processor, is adapted to control or carry out a method for determining an operational parameter of a hybrid active noise reduction device.
  • a hybrid active noise reduction device which offers the possibility for effectively reducing environmental noise such that a level of comfort of a person using the device is significantly enhanced.
  • the device is adapted to cancel or eliminate environmental noise.
  • the hybrid active noise reduction device comprises a filter unit which comprises an analog filter part and a digital filter part being arranged in series to one another such that a filtering operation of the microphone signal may be enhanced in that two filtering operations are performed in series to one another.
  • the output signal of the filter unit may combine an instantaneous filter response of the analog filter part and the complex signal modeling capability of the digital filter part.
  • the device comprises a constructively easy design, since a simple series circuit may be used for arranging the analog filter part and the digital filter part of the filter unit.
  • the noise reduction signal may be identical or be based on the filtered microphone signal.
  • the device may comprise a feedback configuration with the microphone being an error microphone and the filtered microphone signal being fed to the loudspeaker.
  • the noise reduction signal transmitted by the loudspeaker may be recorded by the microphone together with a noise signal.
  • This microphone signal may be used as an error signal for optimizing the noise reduction capability of the device.
  • the error signal may be identical or be based on a combination, particularly a sum, of an ambient noise signal received by the microphone and the noise reduction signal provided by the loudspeaker.
  • the noise reduction signal transmitted by the loudspeaker may be convolved with a transfer function describing a signal path from the loudspeaker to the microphone.
  • the error microphone and the loudspeaker may be implemented inside or form part of an inner part of an earphone of a hybrid active noise reduction headset.
  • the microphone may record ambient noise which a user perceives when wearing the headset.
  • the device may also form part of a hearing aid or a car compartment or any other device application in which the principle of active noise reduction may be usefully applied.
  • an optimization of an operation of the device may be performed such that the noise reduction capability of the device may be increased.
  • a first operational parameter of the device is selected, and a second operational parameter of the device is determined based on the first operational parameter.
  • determining the second operational parameter may comprise computational or mathematical techniques.
  • the method may be performed in an operational state or a resting state of the device.
  • the method may be applied to any hybrid active noise reduction device or device application comprising such a hybrid active noise reduction device.
  • the hybrid active noise reduction device may be of a feedback type or a feedforward type, or of a combination thereof.
  • the analog filter part and the digital filter part may be in series to one another or in parallel to one another.
  • the program element may be identical or be part of e.g. a software routine, a source code or an executable code.
  • the program element may be stored in a computer readable medium (e.g. a volatile memory, a nonvolatile memory, a CD, a DVD, a USB stick, a floppy disk or a harddisk).
  • the device may further comprise a bypass line being arranged in parallel to the digital filter part.
  • the bypass line and the signal path comprising the digital filter part may form a parallel circuit being in series to the analog filter part.
  • a first branch of the parallel circuit may be identical to or comprise the bypass line, and a second branch of the parallel circuit may be identical to or comprise the digital filter part.
  • the output signal of the filter unit and thus the noise reduction signal may comprise a combination of a signal being filtered by the analog filter part and being bypassed and a signal being filtered by the analog filter part and the digital filter part.
  • the output signal of the filter unit may comprise portions which result from the analog filtering operation and the combined analog and digital filtering operation.
  • the filter response of the analog filter part may comprise an instantaneous filter response which may compensate for delayed portions of the filter response of the digital filter part which may be equal to or almost zero over time.
  • the device may comprise a yet more enhanced noise reduction capability, since a more improved signal processing may be performed by the filter unit.
  • the noise reduction signal transmitted by the loudspeaker may be instantaneous due to a bypassing of a signal being already or subsequently to be filtered by the analog filter part.
  • the noise reduction signal may be effectively shaped by the digital filtering operation performed by the digital filter part.
  • delays resulting from the digital filter part particularly resulting from an analog-to-digital signal conversion and a digital-to-analog signal conversion may be compensated for by the instantaneous filter response of the analog filter part.
  • the device may be used for any application in which device delays due to signal conversions from the analog to the digital domain and vice versa may be present.
  • the bypass line may comprise a gain unit.
  • the bypassed signal may be amplified, in order to offer a further modification capability of the output signal of the filter unit, particularly of the noise reduction signal, before transmitting the filtered signal to the loudspeaker. Therefore the noise reduction capability of the device may be further enhanced.
  • the gain unit may comprise a controllable gain unit or a fixed gain unit.
  • the device may further comprise a signal adding unit for adding a bypassed signal and a digitally filtered signal.
  • the signal adding unit may enable a combination or mixture of the bypassed (and amplified) signal and the digitally filtered signal in that the two branches of the formed parallel circuit may be added.
  • the signal adding unit may be adapted to sum the bypassed signal and the digitally filtered signal in an analog way.
  • This embodiment of the signal adding unit may represent a very easy and effective way for performing an adding operation of two signals.
  • the analog filter part may be arranged downstream with respect to the digital filter part.
  • the device may be used in a headset offering voice communications and/or speech capabilities, since it may be desirable that the microphone signal may not be filtered by the analog filter part before inputting it to the digital filter part.
  • this arrangement of the analog filter part and the digital filter part may lead to a low degree of instrumental noise of the device which may comprise self-noise of the microphone and electrical noise of the device.
  • a further amplifier unit may be arranged downstream with respect to the digital filter part for further amplifying the digitally filtered signal.
  • the analog filter part may be arranged upstream with respect to the digital filter part. This arrangement of the analog filter part and the digital filter part may be used in device applications which may not offer voice communications or speech capabilities.
  • an amplifier unit may be arranged downstream with respect to or may be implemented in the microphone for amplifying the recorded noise signal, since the instrumental noise of the device may comprise a relatively high level.
  • the digital filter part may comprise an analog-to-digital convertor for converting an analog signal into a digital signal, a digital filter, and a digital-to-analog convertor for converting a digital signal into an analog signal.
  • This embodiment of the digital filter part offers the technical possibility for digitally filtering a recorded analog microphone signal.
  • the analog-to-digital convertor and the digital-to-analog convertor may introduce signal conversion delays into the signal transmission of the device, thereby reducing the noise reduction capability of the device.
  • the series arrangement of the analog filter part and the digital filter part in combination with the bypass line may compensate for the conversion delays in the device signal path.
  • the analog-to-digital convertor and the digital-to-analog convertor may be identical or form part of a codec (coder-encoder).
  • the codec may comprise a bypass capability, which may be with a controllable gain, thus comprising the bypass line.
  • the digital filter may be identical or form part of a digital signal processor (DSP).
  • the device may comprise a further microphone for receiving a further noise signal and for transmitting a further microphone signal, wherein the analog filter part and/or the digital filter part may operate based on the further microphone signal.
  • the device may comprise a feedforward configuration with the analog filter part and the digital filter part being arranged in series to one another.
  • the microphone may be a reference microphone recording or receiving noise.
  • the further microphone may be an error microphone which may record the further noise, which a person may perceive.
  • the filter unit may filter the reference microphone signal and transmit the filtered reference microphone signal, in particular the noise reduction signal, to the loudspeaker. An error microphone signal recorded by the error microphone may be used for optimizing the noise reduction capability of the device.
  • the error signal may be identical or be based on a combination, particularly a sum, of an ambient noise signal received by the microphone and the noise reduction signal provided by the loudspeaker.
  • the noise reduction signal transmitted by the loudspeaker may be convolved with a transfer function describing a signal path from the loudspeaker to the microphone.
  • the error microphone may be arranged in series to an analog-to-digital convertor for further converting the analog error microphone signal into the digital domain for further signal processing.
  • the error microphone and the loudspeaker may be arranged on the inside of an earphone of a headset, whereas the reference microphone may be arranged on the outside of an earphone of a headset.
  • the digital filter part may comprise a digital filter, wherein the digital filter may be a finite impulse response filter.
  • the analog filter part may comprise an analog filter, wherein the analog filter may be a first order low pass filter.
  • a cut-off frequency of the first order low pass filter may be of about 700 Hz, particularly of about 500 Hz, further particularly of about 300 Hz.
  • the analog filter may also be a higher order low pass filter, a high pass filter, a band pass filter, or a combination thereof, each of which comprising suitable cut-off frequencies.
  • the device may further comprise a bypass line in parallel to the digital filter part, wherein the bypass line may comprise a gain unit, wherein the method may comprise selecting the first operational parameter and determining a second operational parameter and a third operational parameter of the device based on the first operational parameter.
  • the analog filter part may be arranged in or be part of the bypass line.
  • the first operational parameter may be an operational parameter of the analog filter part
  • the second operational parameter may be an operational parameter of the digital filter part
  • the third operational parameter may be an operational parameter of the gain unit.
  • Determining the second operational parameter based on the first operational parameter may comprise minimizing a cost function of the device with respect to the second parameter. This measure represents a very effective and easily performable way for determining minima of the cost function for the second operational parameter, yielding the optimal second operational parameter of the device for operating the device.
  • Determining the second operational parameter and the third operational parameter based on the first operational parameter may comprise minimizing a cost function of the device with respect to the second operational parameter and the third operational parameter.
  • determining the second and third operational parameters of the device Upon simultaneously or jointly determining the second and third operational parameters of the device a very effective and easily performable optimization of the device operation may be achieved.
  • Hybrid ANR devices comprise a filter unit consisting of an analog filter part and digital filter part and thus combine the instantaneous filtering capability of an analog filter and the complex signal tuning capability of a digital filter.
  • Fig. 1 shows a prior art digital ANR device 100 in a feedback configuration.
  • the device 100 comprises a microphone 102, an analog-to-digital convertor (ADC) 104, an ANR digital filter 106, a digital-to-analog convertor (DAC) 108, and a loudspeaker 110.
  • the ADC 104, the digital filter 106, and the DAC 108 may form a digital filter part 112 of a filter unit 114.
  • the device 100 may also comprise amplifiers (not shown) which operate in their linear region.
  • This feedback device 100 may be implemented into a headset such that the microphone 102 and the loudspeaker 110 are both arranged on the inside of an earphone 116 of the headset.
  • the microphone 102 may then be called an "error microphone" and receives a noise signal which a user of the headset may perceive. This noise signal may differ from a noise signal a user may perceive without the headset.
  • analog-to-digital and digital-to-analog conversions are in the following assumed to be ideal, i.e., instantaneous and without loss of information.
  • an analog signal may be represented by a digital signal equivalent, and actual, i.e. non-ideal, conversions may then be conveniently represented by time delays ⁇ ADC and ⁇ DAC .
  • the microphone 102 picks up a signal that comprises an acoustical summation of an ambient noise signal 118 which a user perceives and a noise reduction signal 120 emitted by the loudspeaker 110.
  • An error microphone signal 122 is converted into the digital domain, thereby introducing a delay ⁇ ADC and thus yielding a digital microphone signal 124.
  • This error signal 124 is then filtered by the digital filter 106, and a digitally filtered signal 126 of the digital filter 106 is converted by the DAC 108 to the analog domain, thereby introducing a delay ⁇ ADC to the converted signal 128 and yielding the noise reduction signal 120.
  • the transfer function of the loudspeaker 110 to the microphone 102 describing the acoustical path 130 from the loudspeaker 110 to the microphone 102 is assumed to be linear.
  • the error microphone 102 hence records a sum of the ambient noise signal 118 and the noise reduction signal 120 convolved with the transfer function of the acoustical path 130.
  • the error microphone signal 122 may thus be regarded as an error signal of the device 100.
  • the device 100 shows a poor ANR performance.
  • the ANR performance of the device 100 may be expressed in terms of the "active performance" which is evaluated on the microphone 102 and may be defined as a difference in a power spectral density (PSD) with the ANR device 100 being not operational and with the ANR device 100 being operational.
  • a negative active performance indicates a noise reduction, with a lower value of the active performance indicating an increased noise reduction.
  • the digital ANR devices 100 being expected to be superior to analog ANR devices, the actual performance of the digital ANR device 100 is drastically deteriorated owing to the presence of the time delays ⁇ ADC and ⁇ DAC introduced by the ADC 104 and the DAC 108.
  • FIR digital finite impulse response
  • the first 15 filter taps comprise most of the energy (highest filter coefficients) and are the decisive filter coefficients for the digital filter operation.
  • the conversion delay ⁇ may be interpreted as a delay of the digital filter 106 or a series of zeros at the beginning of the digital filter 106. If this important part of the digital filter 106 is forced to zero, the ANR performance, particularly G ( ⁇ ) , may be substantially degraded, since the digital filter 106 cannot compensate for the acausality of the filter.
  • a hybrid feedback ANR device according to an exemplary embodiment of the invention may be used, which is shown in Fig. 5 .
  • the device 500 may be used in any ANR application. However, the device 500 is most usefully integrated in applications with conversion delays ⁇ degrading the performance of the device 500. In particular, the device 500 may be part of an ANR headset of a feedback type.
  • the hybrid device 500 comprises an error microphone 102, an analog filter part 501 comprising an analog filter 502, a subsequent digital filter part 112 being formed by an ADC 104, a digital filter 106, and a DAC 108 and being in series to the analog filter part 501, and a loudspeaker 110.
  • the ADC 104 and the DAC 108 are provided before and after the digital filter 106 seen in a signal transmitting direction.
  • a gain unit 504 is provided in parallel to the digital filter 106, thus forming a signal bypass line 505.
  • the device 500 comprises a signal adding unit 506 for electrically combining or mixing the signals of the two branches of a parallel circuit 508 of the filter unit 114 before transmitting a combined filtered microphone signal to the loudspeaker 110.
  • the parallel circuit 508 is defined by the gain unit 504 and the digital filter part 112.
  • the analog filter 502 may be designed as a first-order low pass filter.
  • the device 500 uses a combination of an analog filter 502 and digital filter 106 to span the acausal part of the desired impulse response of the filter unit 114.
  • the acausul part of the digital filter 106 can be modelled by an analog, instantaneous filter response.
  • a delay of the analog filter 502 resulting from electronic circuits is assumed to be much smaller than a single sampling period of the digital filter 106, and therefore in this context the analog filter 502 may be considered as instantaneous.
  • the two filters 502, 106 are combined in such a way that they can be conveniently implemented using a bypass of the digital filter 106 which is present in many ADC 104 and DAC 108, reducing the required circuitry of the hybrid device 500.
  • the device 500 shows an increased robustness compared to the device 100.
  • an error signal 122 corresponding to the error microphone signal 122 is filtered by the analog filter 502.
  • the filtered microphone signal 510 is then fed into the parallel circuit 508 comprising the instantaneous analog gain unit 504 and the digital filter 106 having the conversion delays ⁇ ADC and ⁇ DAC .
  • An amplified signal 512 and a digitally filtered and converted signal 128 are then summed to form the combined filtered microphone signal 514 which, in turn, is sent to the loudspeaker 110.
  • the device 500 may comprise the following modifications:
  • a microphone amplifier When performing the analog filtering operation before the signal input to the ADC 104 (shown in Fig. 5 ), a microphone amplifier may be needed for boosting the signal considerably, in order to obtain a reasonable headroom on the digital filter 106, particularly such that there is a sufficient accuracy for fixed-point representation of the signal, and, as a consequence, instrumental noise, i.e. self-noise of the microphone 102 and electrical noise, might become too large.
  • instrumental noise may be of the same order of magnitude as in a normal application such as voice communications. However, it may be possible that the noise reduction signal may need to be boosted beyond a value being possible in the DAC 108, therefore necessitating an additional amplifier stage.
  • the ANR device 500 is implemented in a system which comprises voice communications or speech capture, it may be desirable that the microphone signal remains unfiltered before inputting into the digital filter 106, yielding the configuration of the device 500 comprising the analog filter 502 after the DAC 108 when seen in a signal transmitting direction.
  • the impulse response of the device 500 is given as the superposition by a curve 404 and the impulse response of the digital filter (not shown) in a range of 15 samples to 100 samples.
  • a delay of 15 taps is assumed.
  • the acausal part of the impulse response of the digital filter 106 is given by the impulse response of the analog filter 502, here a first-order low pass filter with cut-off frequency at 700 Hz.
  • the overall impulse response of the filter unit 114 of the device 500 is given as a concatenation of the curves 404, 302.
  • analog bypass functionality of the ADC 104 and DAC 108 allows for a convenient implementation of the branches of the parallel circuit 508.
  • the analog gain unit 504 may be controlled with the digital filter 106 which may be inversely scaled in the digital domain.
  • Fig. 6 shows the active performance G ( ⁇ ) of the hybrid feedback ANR device 500 for a conversion delay ⁇ of zero, two and ten samples (curves 602 and 604, respectively).
  • the length of the digital filter 106 is set to 512 with a sampling rate of 48 kHz.
  • the analog filter 502 is designed as a first-order low pass filter with a cut-off frequency of 700 Hz.
  • a curve 606 corresponds the curve 202 and indicates the active performance of the digital feedback device 100 in the case of zero delay.
  • the noise reduction is prominent in a wide frequency area with a deep noise reduction between about 50 Hz and about 2 kHz.
  • a maximal noise reduction value is about 18 dB.
  • the active performance G ( ⁇ ) is maintained for a delay of 10 samples, since no significant changes in G ( ⁇ ) for different delays are visible.
  • the maximal delay ⁇ for which the active performance G( ⁇ ) is robust depends on a design of the device 500 and particularly on the analog filter 502 used. In this exemplary case, the active performance is maintained for delays below 10 samples using a first-order analog filter 502. When using a higher-order analog filter 502, the hybrid device 500 is made robust to longer delays ⁇ .
  • the hybrid device 500 may be optimised in terms of optimizing an operational parameter of components of the parallel circuit 508.
  • the analog gain unit 504 and the filter coefficients of the digital filter 106 may be jointly optimised without the need of a model of the analog filter 502, thereby omitting an introduction of additional errors into the optimal performance parameters of the device 500.
  • a cost function of the device may be minimized with respect to the operational parameters of the analog gain unit 504 and the digital filter 106, with the operational parameter of the analog filter 502 being fixed.
  • Fig. 7 shows a known digital ANR device 700 in a feedforward configuration.
  • the device 700 is part of a headset and comprises a reference microphone 102, an ADC 104, a digital filter 106, a DAC 108, and a loudspeaker 110. Further, the device comprises an error microphone 702, arranged together with the loudspeaker 110 on the inside of an earphone 116.
  • a further ADC 704 is provided and is arranged upstream with respect to the error microphone 702.
  • the reference microphone 102 may be arranged on the outside of the earphone 116 such that the reference microphone 102 receives the actual noise of the environment. As the error microphone 702 is arranged on the inside of the earphone 116 of the headset, the error microphone 702 receives the noise a user of the headset may perceive.
  • the reference microphone 102 records a noise signal 118 and outputs a reference microphone signal 122 which is converted by the ADC 104, yielding a delayed signal 124.
  • This signal 124 is filtered by the digital filter 106, and the digitally filtered signal 126 is converted by the DAC 108, yielding a delayed signal 128.
  • the noise reduction signal 120 is played via the loudspeaker 110.
  • the error microphone 702 receives an error signal 708 which is a combination of the ambient noise signal 706 and the noise reduction signal 120.
  • the error signal 708 is then converted by the ADC 704 and forms a digital error signal 710 to be used for operating the digital filter part 112.
  • G ( ⁇ ) The frequency dependency of the ANR active performance G ( ⁇ ) of the device 700 is shown in Fig. 8 for different delays ⁇ .
  • Curves 802-808 correspond to a delay ⁇ of zero samples, eight samples, 16 samples, and 26 samples using a sampling rate of 48 kHz.
  • a reference ANR performance for an analog, instantaneous first-order low pass filter indicated is indicated by a curve 810, the parameters of which have been optimised in a similar manner.
  • the active performance Upon increasing the delay ⁇ the active performance considerably degrades.
  • the ANR performance G ( ⁇ ) is high.
  • the gain becomes less negative meaning a lower noise reduction.
  • Fig. 9 shows the corresponding sample index dependency of the impulse response of the digital filter 106 for the delay ⁇ being zero samples, eight samples, 16 samples, and 26 samples (curves 902-908) for only the first 200 samples, in order to understand the performance degradation of the device 700. Due to the delay ⁇ the first ⁇ samples of the impulse response curves 902-908 are equal to zero. Upon increasing the delay ⁇ the acausal part of the impulse response corresponding to the zero values at low sample indices becomes longer. Thus the corresponding part of the optimal delay-free impulse response (curve 902) cannot be achieved by a causal digital filter 106, and the ANR performance of the device 700 is degraded.
  • FIR finite impulse response
  • the function g FIR ( ⁇ ) equals [1 exp(-l ⁇ ) ... exp (-t( L - 1) ⁇ ] T . Integration is performed over a frequency range ⁇ of interest. Minimization of the cost function results in optimal operational parameters of the digital filter 106, given the acoustical path 130 (without conversion delay ⁇ ) and the delay ⁇ .
  • Fig. 10 shows a hybrid ANR device 1000 according to another exemplary embodiment of the invention.
  • the device 1000 comprises a reference microphone 102, an analog filter 502, a parallel circuit 508 comprising an ADC 104, a digital filter 106, and a DAC 108 in one branch line and a gain unit 504 in a further bypass branch line 505, a signal adding unit 506, and a loudspeaker 110.
  • a sequence of arrangement of these device components is seen in a signal transmitting direction.
  • the device 1000 comprises an error microphone 702 and a further ADC 704.
  • the reference microphone 102 is arranged on the outside of an earphone 116 of the headset, and the error microphone 702 and the loudspeaker 110 are arranged on the inside of an earphone 116 of the headset.
  • a noise signal 118 is received by the reference microphone 102 and transmitted to the analog filter 502.
  • the filtered microphone signal 510 is fed into the parallel circuit 508 such that the filtered microphone signal 510 is on the one hand converted into the digital domain, filtered by the digital filter 126 and converted back to the analog domain.
  • the filtered microphone signal 510 is bypassed over the gain unit 504.
  • the amplified microphone signal 512 and the digitally filtered microphone signal 128 are summed by the signal adding unit 506 to form a filtered microphone signal 514.
  • a noise reduction signal 120 is emitted by the loudspeaker 110.
  • the error microphone 702 receives an ambient noise signal 706 and the noise reduction signal 120.
  • An error signal 708 being transmitted by the error microphone 702 is fed to a further ADC 704.
  • a converted signal 710 may be used for parameter optimization of the device 1000.
  • a method for determining a first operational parameter of the device 1000 is based on minimizing a cost function describing characteristics of the device 1000.
  • Optimizing the cost function may be performed jointly, computing the optimal operational parameters of the analog gain unit 504 (parameter K ) and of the digital filter 106 (parameter w FIR ) based on the analog filter 502 (parameter p a ).
  • Fig. 11 shows a known hybrid ANR device 1100 comprising a feedforward configuration.
  • the device 1100 is based on the device 700 with further comprising a parallel circuit 508 being part of the filter unit 114.
  • a first branch of the parallel circuit 508 corresponds to the arrangement of the ADC 104, the digital filter 106, and the DAC 108.
  • a second branch of the parallel circuit 508 comprises an analog filter 502 and a gain unit 504 being provided downstream with respect to the analog filter 502. Output signals of the two branches are summed by the signal adding unit 506.
  • the error microphone 702 may be replaced by a temporary measurement microphone.
  • the reference microphone 102 records a noise signal 118 and feeds a reference microphone signal 122 to the parallel circuit 508.
  • the signal 122 is filtered by the digital filter 106 in the digital domain and meanwhile filterd by the analog filter 502 and amplified by the gain unit 504. After signal summation a filtered microphone signal 514 is provided to the loudspeaker 110 which outputs a noise reduction signal 120.
  • the error microphone 702 records a combination of an ambient noise signal 706 and the noise reduction signal 120 and outputs an error signal 708 to the further ADC 104.
  • the device 1100 combines the instantaneous filter response of the analog filter 502 with the filter accuracy and complexity of the digital filter 106. Since the analog filter 502 is able to perform an instantaneous filtering operation, the acausal part of the impulse response of the digital filter 106 may be crudely modelled such that the ANR performance of the device 1100 is largely robust with respect to the presence of delays ⁇ ADC and ⁇ ADC of the ADC 104 and the DAC 108, respectively.
  • Fig. 12 shows a frequency dependency of the active ANR performance G ( ⁇ ) of the hybrid device 1100 for different delay values ⁇ being zero samples, eight samples, 16 samples, and 26 samples indicated by curves 1202-1208.
  • the active performance of an analog first-order low pass filter is indicated by a curve 1210. It can be observed that the ANR performance is largely maintained for increasing values of the delay ⁇ , with only a slight degradation occurring in a frequency region between about 300 Hz and about 1000 Hz.
  • Fig. 13 shows the corresponding sample index dependency of the impulse response of the filter unit 114 (sum of the filter response of the analog filter 502 with gain unit 504 and the filter response of the digital filter 106) for the delays ⁇ being zero samples, eight samples, 16 samples, and 26 samples (curves 1302-1308).
  • the acausal part of the impulse response is represented by a thick portion of the curves 1302-1308 and may be clearly modelled by exponentially decreasing functions. These functions are the impulse responses of the analog first-order low pass filter 502.
  • the method mentioned above is adapted for optimizing the operation of the device 1100.
  • may be convenient to fix ⁇ to a predetermined value and only optimise the gain K in combination with the digital filter coefficients w FIR .
  • the optimal gain parameters K of the analog gain unit 504 and the optimal FIR filter w FIR of the digital filter 106 of the hybrid device 1100.
  • further algorithms for computing the parameters such as an adaptive least mean square based algorithm.
  • optimisation of the parameters may then be performed offline, wherein the filter coefficients and the gain parameter may remain fixed during normal operation of the device 1100.

Abstract

A hybrid active noise reduction device for reducing environmental noise is provided, the device (500) comprising a microphone (102) for receiving a noise signal (118) and for transmitting a microphone signal (122), a filter unit (114) for receiving the microphone signal (122) and for transmitting a filtered microphone signal (514), the filter unit (114) comprising an analog filter part (501) and a digital filter part (112), the analog filter part (501) and the digital filter part (112) being arranged in series to one another, and a loudspeaker (110) for transmitting a noise reduction signal (120) based on the filtered microphone signal (514). A bypass line (505) is arranged in parallel to the digital filter part (112) to add the outputs of the analog filter part (501) and the digital filter part (112).

Description

    FIELD OF THE INVENTION
  • The invention relates to a hybrid active noise reduction device for reducing environmental noise.
  • Further, the invention relates to a method for determining an operational parameter of a hybrid active noise reduction device.
  • Further, the invention relates to a program element.
  • BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
  • Active noise reduction (ANR) is a widely known principle, which may be applied in order to reduce environmental noise which a person may experience and thus to increase a level of comfort for the person in his noisy environment.
  • An ANR device may comprise at least one microphone, a filter unit, and a loudspeaker. The microphone receives a noise signal from the noisy environment of the person and transmits a microphone signal to the filter unit. The filter unit performs a filtering operation on the microphone signal and transmits a noise reduction signal to the loudspeaker for further broadcast to the environment. The noise reduction signal is in counter phase to the environmental noise such that the level of ambient noise perceived by the person is reduced, thereby enhancing the comfort of the person.
  • An ANR device may comprise a feedforward configuration or a feedback configuration, or a combination thereof, and may be implemented in a headset, in a hearing aid or in a car compartment.
  • In the feedforward configuration, the ANR device comprises a reference microphone which may be arranged in such a way that it mainly picks up the environmental noise from outside. The noise reduction signal emitted by the loudspeaker is a filtered version of the reference microphone signal. The filtering operation performed by the filter unit may be optimized by arranging an error microphone in such a way that the error microphone records ambient noise which a person perceives. The filter unit may be optimized in that the sound level at the error microphone may be minimized. When implementing the device in a headset, the reference microphone is arranged on the outside of an earphone of the headset, whereas the error microphone and the loudspeaker are arranged on the inside of an earphone of the headset.
  • A feedback ANR device uses only an error microphone arranged in such a way that the error microphone records ambient noise which a person may perceive. The error microphone signal is filtered by the filter unit and is emitted by the loudspeaker. The filter unit may also be optimized by minimizing the sound level at the error microphone.
  • The filter unit of an ANR device may comprise an analog filter and/or a digital filter. An ANR device comprising an analog filter and a digital filter is known as a "hybrid" ANR device. The use of an analog filter may allow for using the instantaneous analog filter response, whereas the use of a digital filter may enable a more complex signal filtering capability. However, using a digital filter may introduce delays into the digital filter response which may result from analog-to-digital and digital-to-analog convertors being constructively indispensible in the signal processing path and being arranged upstream and downstream of the digital filter. In particular, these delays may force the digital filter response being zero in particular time intervals.
  • US 5,440,642 B1 discloses a digitally controlled hybrid ANR device in a feedback configuration which comprises a microphone, a filter unit, and a loudspeaker. A microphone signal is filtered by the filter unit, and a filtered signal is transmitted to the loudspeaker. The filter unit comprises an analog filter which is digitally controlled using a digital signal processor comprising a digital filter. The analog filter and the digital filter are arranged in parallel to one another.
  • OBJECT AND SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
  • It is an object of the invention to provide a hybrid active noise reduction device, a method for determining an operational parameter of a hybrid active noise reduction device, and a program element offering an improved noise reduction capability.
  • In order to achieve the object defined above, a hybrid active noise reduction device for reducing environmental noise, a method for determining an operational parameter of a hybrid active noise reduction device, and a program element are provided.
  • According to an exemplary embodiment of the invention, a hybrid active noise reduction device for reducing environmental noise is provided, the device comprising a microphone for receiving a noise signal and for transmitting a microphone signal, a filter unit for receiving the microphone signal and for transmitting a filtered microphone signal, the filter unit comprising an analog filter part and a digital filter part, the analog filter part and the digital filter part being arranged in series to one another, and a loudspeaker for transmitting a noise reduction signal based on the filtered microphone signal.
  • According to another exemplary embodiment of the invention, a headset is provided, the headset comprising a hybrid active noise reduction device for reducing environmental noise.
  • According to another exemplary embodiment of the invention, a method for determining an operational parameter of a hybrid active noise reduction device is provided, the active noise reduction device comprising a microphone for receiving a noise signal and for transmitting a microphone signal, a filter unit for receiving the microphone signal and for transmitting a filtered microphone signal, the filter unit comprising an analog filter part and a digital filter part, and a loudspeaker for transmitting a noise reduction signal based on the filtered microphone signal, the method comprising selecting a first operational parameter of the device and determining a second operational parameter of the device based on the first operational parameter.
  • According to another exemplary embodiment of the invention, a program element is provided, which, when being executed by a processor, is adapted to control or carry out a method for determining an operational parameter of a hybrid active noise reduction device.
  • According to the exemplary embodiments of the invention, a hybrid active noise reduction device is provided which offers the possibility for effectively reducing environmental noise such that a level of comfort of a person using the device is significantly enhanced. In particular, the device is adapted to cancel or eliminate environmental noise.
  • The hybrid active noise reduction device comprises a filter unit which comprises an analog filter part and a digital filter part being arranged in series to one another such that a filtering operation of the microphone signal may be enhanced in that two filtering operations are performed in series to one another. Thus the output signal of the filter unit may combine an instantaneous filter response of the analog filter part and the complex signal modeling capability of the digital filter part.
  • Further, the device comprises a constructively easy design, since a simple series circuit may be used for arranging the analog filter part and the digital filter part of the filter unit.
  • The noise reduction signal may be identical or be based on the filtered microphone signal.
  • The device may comprise a feedback configuration with the microphone being an error microphone and the filtered microphone signal being fed to the loudspeaker. The noise reduction signal transmitted by the loudspeaker may be recorded by the microphone together with a noise signal. This microphone signal may be used as an error signal for optimizing the noise reduction capability of the device. The error signal may be identical or be based on a combination, particularly a sum, of an ambient noise signal received by the microphone and the noise reduction signal provided by the loudspeaker. In particular, the noise reduction signal transmitted by the loudspeaker may be convolved with a transfer function describing a signal path from the loudspeaker to the microphone.
  • In particular, the error microphone and the loudspeaker may be implemented inside or form part of an inner part of an earphone of a hybrid active noise reduction headset. The microphone may record ambient noise which a user perceives when wearing the headset.
  • The device may also form part of a hearing aid or a car compartment or any other device application in which the principle of active noise reduction may be usefully applied.
  • Respecting the method for determining an operational parameter of a hybrid active noise reduction device, an optimization of an operation of the device may be performed such that the noise reduction capability of the device may be increased. A first operational parameter of the device is selected, and a second operational parameter of the device is determined based on the first operational parameter. The first operational parameter and/or the second operational parameter may comprise a device characteristic, in particular a characteristic of a device component. Such a component of the device may be the analog filter part and the digital filter part. Determining the second operational parameter based on the first operational parameter may comprise fixing the first operational parameter or keeping the first operational parameter constant and determining the second operational parameter. In particular, determining the second operational parameter may comprise computational or mathematical techniques.
  • In particular, the method may be performed in an operational state or a resting state of the device.
  • The method may be applied to any hybrid active noise reduction device or device application comprising such a hybrid active noise reduction device. In particular, the hybrid active noise reduction device may be of a feedback type or a feedforward type, or of a combination thereof. In particular, the analog filter part and the digital filter part may be in series to one another or in parallel to one another.
  • Respecting the program element, the program element may be identical or be part of e.g. a software routine, a source code or an executable code. In particular, the program element may be stored in a computer readable medium (e.g. a volatile memory, a nonvolatile memory, a CD, a DVD, a USB stick, a floppy disk or a harddisk).
  • Next, further exemplary embodiments of the hybrid active noise reduction device for reducing environmental noise will be explained. However, these embodiments also apply to the headset, the method, and the program element.
  • The device may further comprise a bypass line being arranged in parallel to the digital filter part. Thus the bypass line and the signal path comprising the digital filter part may form a parallel circuit being in series to the analog filter part. A first branch of the parallel circuit may be identical to or comprise the bypass line, and a second branch of the parallel circuit may be identical to or comprise the digital filter part. The output signal of the filter unit and thus the noise reduction signal may comprise a combination of a signal being filtered by the analog filter part and being bypassed and a signal being filtered by the analog filter part and the digital filter part. In particular, the output signal of the filter unit may comprise portions which result from the analog filtering operation and the combined analog and digital filtering operation. In particular, the filter response of the analog filter part may comprise an instantaneous filter response which may compensate for delayed portions of the filter response of the digital filter part which may be equal to or almost zero over time. Thus the device may comprise a yet more enhanced noise reduction capability, since a more improved signal processing may be performed by the filter unit. In particular, the noise reduction signal transmitted by the loudspeaker may be instantaneous due to a bypassing of a signal being already or subsequently to be filtered by the analog filter part. Further, the noise reduction signal may be effectively shaped by the digital filtering operation performed by the digital filter part. In particular, delays resulting from the digital filter part, particularly resulting from an analog-to-digital signal conversion and a digital-to-analog signal conversion may be compensated for by the instantaneous filter response of the analog filter part.
  • In particular, the device may be used for any application in which device delays due to signal conversions from the analog to the digital domain and vice versa may be present.
  • The bypass line may comprise a gain unit. Thus the bypassed signal may be amplified, in order to offer a further modification capability of the output signal of the filter unit, particularly of the noise reduction signal, before transmitting the filtered signal to the loudspeaker. Therefore the noise reduction capability of the device may be further enhanced. In particular, the gain unit may comprise a controllable gain unit or a fixed gain unit.
  • The device may further comprise a signal adding unit for adding a bypassed signal and a digitally filtered signal. The signal adding unit may enable a combination or mixture of the bypassed (and amplified) signal and the digitally filtered signal in that the two branches of the formed parallel circuit may be added.
  • The signal adding unit may be adapted to sum the bypassed signal and the digitally filtered signal in an analog way. This embodiment of the signal adding unit may represent a very easy and effective way for performing an adding operation of two signals.
  • The analog filter part may be arranged downstream with respect to the digital filter part. Thus the device may be used in a headset offering voice communications and/or speech capabilities, since it may be desirable that the microphone signal may not be filtered by the analog filter part before inputting it to the digital filter part. In particular, this arrangement of the analog filter part and the digital filter part may lead to a low degree of instrumental noise of the device which may comprise self-noise of the microphone and electrical noise of the device. In particular, a further amplifier unit may be arranged downstream with respect to the digital filter part for further amplifying the digitally filtered signal.
  • The analog filter part may be arranged upstream with respect to the digital filter part. This arrangement of the analog filter part and the digital filter part may be used in device applications which may not offer voice communications or speech capabilities. In particular, an amplifier unit may be arranged downstream with respect to or may be implemented in the microphone for amplifying the recorded noise signal, since the instrumental noise of the device may comprise a relatively high level.
  • The digital filter part may comprise an analog-to-digital convertor for converting an analog signal into a digital signal, a digital filter, and a digital-to-analog convertor for converting a digital signal into an analog signal. This embodiment of the digital filter part offers the technical possibility for digitally filtering a recorded analog microphone signal. In particular, the analog-to-digital convertor and the digital-to-analog convertor may introduce signal conversion delays into the signal transmission of the device, thereby reducing the noise reduction capability of the device. In particular, the series arrangement of the analog filter part and the digital filter part in combination with the bypass line may compensate for the conversion delays in the device signal path. The analog-to-digital convertor and the digital-to-analog convertor may be identical or form part of a codec (coder-encoder). The codec may comprise a bypass capability, which may be with a controllable gain, thus comprising the bypass line. The digital filter may be identical or form part of a digital signal processor (DSP).
  • The device may comprise a further microphone for receiving a further noise signal and for transmitting a further microphone signal, wherein the analog filter part and/or the digital filter part may operate based on the further microphone signal. Thus the device may comprise a feedforward configuration with the analog filter part and the digital filter part being arranged in series to one another. The microphone may be a reference microphone recording or receiving noise. The further microphone may be an error microphone which may record the further noise, which a person may perceive. The filter unit may filter the reference microphone signal and transmit the filtered reference microphone signal, in particular the noise reduction signal, to the loudspeaker. An error microphone signal recorded by the error microphone may be used for optimizing the noise reduction capability of the device. The error signal may be identical or be based on a combination, particularly a sum, of an ambient noise signal received by the microphone and the noise reduction signal provided by the loudspeaker. In particular, the noise reduction signal transmitted by the loudspeaker may be convolved with a transfer function describing a signal path from the loudspeaker to the microphone. In particular, the error microphone may be arranged in series to an analog-to-digital convertor for further converting the analog error microphone signal into the digital domain for further signal processing. In particular, the error microphone and the loudspeaker may be arranged on the inside of an earphone of a headset, whereas the reference microphone may be arranged on the outside of an earphone of a headset.
  • The digital filter part may comprise a digital filter, wherein the digital filter may be a finite impulse response filter.
  • The analog filter part may comprise an analog filter, wherein the analog filter may be a first order low pass filter. A cut-off frequency of the first order low pass filter may be of about 700 Hz, particularly of about 500 Hz, further particularly of about 300 Hz. In particular, the analog filter may also be a higher order low pass filter, a high pass filter, a band pass filter, or a combination thereof, each of which comprising suitable cut-off frequencies.
  • Next, further exemplary embodiments of the method for determining on operational parameter of a hybrid active noise reduction device may be explained. However, these embodiments also apply to the device, the headset, and the program element.
  • The device may further comprise a bypass line in parallel to the digital filter part, wherein the bypass line may comprise a gain unit, wherein the method may comprise selecting the first operational parameter and determining a second operational parameter and a third operational parameter of the device based on the first operational parameter. Thus a more improved optimization of the operation of the device is provided, since more operational parameters of the device and thus device characteristics may be determined. In particular, the analog filter part may be arranged in or be part of the bypass line.
  • The first operational parameter may be an operational parameter of the analog filter part, the second operational parameter may be an operational parameter of the digital filter part, and the third operational parameter may be an operational parameter of the gain unit. Thus the operation of the device may be optimized by selecting the operational parameter of the analog filter part which may be known from a constructive design of the analog filter part. The operational parameters of a parallel circuit comprising the bypass line with the gain unit and the digital filter part may thus be determined.
  • Determining the second operational parameter based on the first operational parameter may comprise minimizing a cost function of the device with respect to the second parameter. This measure represents a very effective and easily performable way for determining minima of the cost function for the second operational parameter, yielding the optimal second operational parameter of the device for operating the device.
  • Determining the second operational parameter and the third operational parameter based on the first operational parameter may comprise minimizing a cost function of the device with respect to the second operational parameter and the third operational parameter. Upon simultaneously or jointly determining the second and third operational parameters of the device a very effective and easily performable optimization of the device operation may be achieved.
  • The aspects defined above and further aspects of the present invention are apparent from the examples of embodiment to be described hereinafter and are explained with reference to the examples of embodiment. The invention will be described in more detail hereinafter with reference to examples of embodiment but to which the invention is not limited.
  • BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
  • The invention will be described in more detail hereinafter with reference to examples of embodiment, but to which the invention is not limited.
    • Fig. 1 shows a known digital ANR device in a feedback configuration.
    • Fig. 2 shows a frequency dependency of an active performance of the device in Fig. 1 for different delays.
    • Fig. 3 shows a sample index dependency of an impulse response of a filter unit of the device in Fig. 1 for zero delay.
    • Fig. 4 shows a sample index dependency of an impulse response for the filter unit of the device in Fig. 1 for a delay of 15 samples.
    • Fig. 5 shows a hybrid ANR device in a feedback configuration according to an exemplary embodiment of the invention.
    • Fig. 6 shows a frequency dependency of an active performance of the device in Fig. 5 for different delays.
    • Fig. 7 shows a known digital ANR device in a feedforward configuration.
    • Fig. 8 shows a frequency dependency of an active performance of the device in Fig. 7 for different delays.
    • Fig. 9 shows a sample index dependency of an impulse response of a filter unit of the device in Fig. 7 for different delays.
    • Fig. 10 shows a hybrid ANR device in a feedforward configuration according to another exemplary embodiment of the invention.
    • Fig. 11 shows a known hybrid ANR device in a feedforward configuration.
    • Fig. 12 shows a frequency dependency of an active performance of the device in Fig. 11 for different delays.
    • Fig. 13 shows a sample index dependency of an impulse response of the filter unit of the device in Fig. 11 for different delays.
    DESCRIPTION OF EMBODIMENTS
  • The illustration in the drawing is schematically. It is noted that in different figures, similar or identical elements are provided with the same reference signs or with reference signs, which are different from the corresponding reference signs only within the first digits.
  • Hybrid ANR devices comprise a filter unit consisting of an analog filter part and digital filter part and thus combine the instantaneous filtering capability of an analog filter and the complex signal tuning capability of a digital filter.
  • In the following, active noise reduction using a feedback configuration is explained.
  • Fig. 1 shows a prior art digital ANR device 100 in a feedback configuration. The device 100 comprises a microphone 102, an analog-to-digital convertor (ADC) 104, an ANR digital filter 106, a digital-to-analog convertor (DAC) 108, and a loudspeaker 110. The ADC 104, the digital filter 106, and the DAC 108 may form a digital filter part 112 of a filter unit 114. The device 100 may also comprise amplifiers (not shown) which operate in their linear region.
  • This feedback device 100 may be implemented into a headset such that the microphone 102 and the loudspeaker 110 are both arranged on the inside of an earphone 116 of the headset. The microphone 102 may then be called an "error microphone" and receives a noise signal which a user of the headset may perceive. This noise signal may differ from a noise signal a user may perceive without the headset.
  • For convenience, the analog-to-digital and digital-to-analog conversions are in the following assumed to be ideal, i.e., instantaneous and without loss of information. Thus, an analog signal may be represented by a digital signal equivalent, and actual, i.e. non-ideal, conversions may then be conveniently represented by time delays Δ ADC and Δ DAC .
  • In operation of the device 100, the microphone 102 picks up a signal that comprises an acoustical summation of an ambient noise signal 118 which a user perceives and a noise reduction signal 120 emitted by the loudspeaker 110. An error microphone signal 122 is converted into the digital domain, thereby introducing a delay ΔADC and thus yielding a digital microphone signal 124. This error signal 124 is then filtered by the digital filter 106, and a digitally filtered signal 126 of the digital filter 106 is converted by the DAC 108 to the analog domain, thereby introducing a delay ΔADC to the converted signal 128 and yielding the noise reduction signal 120. The transfer function of the loudspeaker 110 to the microphone 102 describing the acoustical path 130 from the loudspeaker 110 to the microphone 102 is assumed to be linear. The error microphone 102 hence records a sum of the ambient noise signal 118 and the noise reduction signal 120 convolved with the transfer function of the acoustical path 130. The error microphone signal 122 may thus be regarded as an error signal of the device 100.
  • As shown in Fig. 2 , the device 100 shows a poor ANR performance.
  • In general, the ANR performance of the device 100 may be expressed in terms of the "active performance" which is evaluated on the microphone 102 and may be defined as a difference in a power spectral density (PSD) with the ANR device 100 being not operational and with the ANR device 100 being operational. G(ω) thus reads G ω = 10 log 10 Φ d ω 10 log 10 Φ s ω ,
    Figure imgb0001

    with Φs(ω) denoting the PSD of the (residual) error microphone signal 122 comprising an ANR processing and Φ d (ω) denoting the PSD of the ambient noise signal 118 at the error microphone 102 without an ANR processing. Thus a negative active performance indicates a noise reduction, with a lower value of the active performance indicating an increased noise reduction. Although it is generally assumed the digital ANR devices 100 being expected to be superior to analog ANR devices, the actual performance of the digital ANR device 100 is drastically deteriorated owing to the presence of the time delays Δ ADC and Δ DAC introduced by the ADC 104 and the DAC 108.
  • Active performance G(ω) curves 202-212 are shown for delay values Δ = Δ ADC + Δ DAC between zero and ten samples in steps of two samples. Signal sampling at 48 kHz using a digital finite impulse response (FIR) filter of 512 taps is used. Further, the signal recording is performed in the diffuse noise condition. It can be observed that the performance G(ω) degrades considerably upon presence of a delay Δ: In the delay-free case indicated by the curve 202, the ANR performance G(ω) shows a deep and broad region of noise reduction down to a maximum of about 18 dB, while for a delay of ten samples indicated by the curve 212, the performance G(ω) is rather poor with a value of less than 6 dB.
  • This deterioration of the active performance of the device 100 resulting from the delay Δ may be explained with respect to Fig. 3 and 4 which show the sample dependency of an impulse response of the digital filter 100 having zero delay Δ and a delay of Δ = 15 samples. In both figures, only the first 100 taps of the digital filtering operation are shown.
  • Respecting a curve 302 (zero delay) in Fig. 3 , the first 15 filter taps comprise most of the energy (highest filter coefficients) and are the decisive filter coefficients for the digital filter operation. As seen from a curve 402 in Fig. 4 , introducing a delay of Δ = 15 taps yields the first delay coefficients being forced to zero, since the digital filter is causal. Thus, owing to the linearity of the device 100, the conversion delay Δ may be interpreted as a delay of the digital filter 106 or a series of zeros at the beginning of the digital filter 106. If this important part of the digital filter 106 is forced to zero, the ANR performance, particularly G(ω), may be substantially degraded, since the digital filter 106 cannot compensate for the acausality of the filter.
  • In order to compensate for the delay of the digital ANR device 100, a hybrid feedback ANR device according to an exemplary embodiment of the invention may be used, which is shown in Fig. 5 .
  • The device 500 may be used in any ANR application. However, the device 500 is most usefully integrated in applications with conversion delays Δ degrading the performance of the device 500. In particular, the device 500 may be part of an ANR headset of a feedback type.
  • The hybrid device 500 comprises an error microphone 102, an analog filter part 501 comprising an analog filter 502, a subsequent digital filter part 112 being formed by an ADC 104, a digital filter 106, and a DAC 108 and being in series to the analog filter part 501, and a loudspeaker 110. The ADC 104 and the DAC 108 are provided before and after the digital filter 106 seen in a signal transmitting direction. A gain unit 504 is provided in parallel to the digital filter 106, thus forming a signal bypass line 505. Further, the device 500 comprises a signal adding unit 506 for electrically combining or mixing the signals of the two branches of a parallel circuit 508 of the filter unit 114 before transmitting a combined filtered microphone signal to the loudspeaker 110. The parallel circuit 508 is defined by the gain unit 504 and the digital filter part 112. The analog filter 502 may be designed as a first-order low pass filter.
  • Thus, the device 500 uses a combination of an analog filter 502 and digital filter 106 to span the acausal part of the desired impulse response of the filter unit 114. Thus the acausul part of the digital filter 106 can be modelled by an analog, instantaneous filter response. In this context, a delay of the analog filter 502 resulting from electronic circuits is assumed to be much smaller than a single sampling period of the digital filter 106, and therefore in this context the analog filter 502 may be considered as instantaneous. The two filters 502, 106 are combined in such a way that they can be conveniently implemented using a bypass of the digital filter 106 which is present in many ADC 104 and DAC 108, reducing the required circuitry of the hybrid device 500. Thus, the device 500 shows an increased robustness compared to the device 100.
  • In operation of the device 500, an error signal 122 corresponding to the error microphone signal 122 is filtered by the analog filter 502. The filtered microphone signal 510 is then fed into the parallel circuit 508 comprising the instantaneous analog gain unit 504 and the digital filter 106 having the conversion delays Δ ADC and Δ DAC . An amplified signal 512 and a digitally filtered and converted signal 128 are then summed to form the combined filtered microphone signal 514 which, in turn, is sent to the loudspeaker 110.
  • The device 500 may comprise the following modifications:
    • The analog filter 502 may also be provided after the digital filter 106 seen in a signal transmitting direction. Thus the analog filtering operation may take place before inputting a signal to the ADC 104 or after outputting of the signal of the DAC 108. The arrangement of the analog filter 502 and digital filter 106 may be chosen according to the application of the device 500.
  • When performing the analog filtering operation before the signal input to the ADC 104 (shown in Fig. 5 ), a microphone amplifier may be needed for boosting the signal considerably, in order to obtain a reasonable headroom on the digital filter 106, particularly such that there is a sufficient accuracy for fixed-point representation of the signal, and, as a consequence, instrumental noise, i.e. self-noise of the microphone 102 and electrical noise, might become too large.
  • When performing the analog filtering operation after the DAC 108, instrumental noise may be of the same order of magnitude as in a normal application such as voice communications. However, it may be possible that the noise reduction signal may need to be boosted beyond a value being possible in the DAC 108, therefore necessitating an additional amplifier stage.
  • If the ANR device 500 is implemented in a system which comprises voice communications or speech capture, it may be desirable that the microphone signal remains unfiltered before inputting into the digital filter 106, yielding the configuration of the device 500 comprising the analog filter 502 after the DAC 108 when seen in a signal transmitting direction.
  • Again referring to Fig. 4 , the impulse response of the device 500 is given as the superposition by a curve 404 and the impulse response of the digital filter (not shown) in a range of 15 samples to 100 samples. Here, a delay of 15 taps is assumed. The acausal part of the impulse response of the digital filter 106 is given by the impulse response of the analog filter 502, here a first-order low pass filter with cut-off frequency at 700 Hz. Thus, the overall impulse response of the filter unit 114 of the device 500 is given as a concatenation of the curves 404, 302.
  • Therefore the analog bypass functionality of the ADC 104 and DAC 108 allows for a convenient implementation of the branches of the parallel circuit 508. By setting the global output gain of the parallel circuit 508, the analog gain unit 504 may be controlled with the digital filter 106 which may be inversely scaled in the digital domain.
  • Fig. 6 shows the active performance G(ω) of the hybrid feedback ANR device 500 for a conversion delay Δ of zero, two and ten samples ( curves 602 and 604, respectively). The length of the digital filter 106 is set to 512 with a sampling rate of 48 kHz. Further, the analog filter 502 is designed as a first-order low pass filter with a cut-off frequency of 700 Hz. For convenience, a curve 606 corresponds the curve 202 and indicates the active performance of the digital feedback device 100 in the case of zero delay.
  • Similarly to the delay-free digital feedback device 100 (curve 202 in Fig. 2 ), the noise reduction is prominent in a wide frequency area with a deep noise reduction between about 50 Hz and about 2 kHz. A maximal noise reduction value is about 18 dB. However, in contrast to the ANR device 100, the active performance G(ω) is maintained for a delay of 10 samples, since no significant changes in G(ω) for different delays are visible. In general, the maximal delay Δ for which the active performance G(ω) is robust depends on a design of the device 500 and particularly on the analog filter 502 used. In this exemplary case, the active performance is maintained for delays below 10 samples using a first-order analog filter 502. When using a higher-order analog filter 502, the hybrid device 500 is made robust to longer delays Δ.
  • In the following, a method for determining an operational parameter of the device 500 according to an exemplary embodiment of the invention will be explained. The method is adapted to optimize an operation of the device 500.
  • If an operational parameter of the analog filter 502 is fixed, the hybrid device 500 may be optimised in terms of optimizing an operational parameter of components of the parallel circuit 508. In particular, the analog gain unit 504 and the filter coefficients of the digital filter 106 may be jointly optimised without the need of a model of the analog filter 502, thereby omitting an introduction of additional errors into the optimal performance parameters of the device 500. In order to select the operational parameter of the device 500, a cost function of the device may be minimized with respect to the operational parameters of the analog gain unit 504 and the digital filter 106, with the operational parameter of the analog filter 502 being fixed.
  • In the following, a hybrid ANR device in a feedforward configuration will be explained.
  • Fig. 7 shows a known digital ANR device 700 in a feedforward configuration. The device 700 is part of a headset and comprises a reference microphone 102, an ADC 104, a digital filter 106, a DAC 108, and a loudspeaker 110. Further, the device comprises an error microphone 702, arranged together with the loudspeaker 110 on the inside of an earphone 116. A further ADC 704 is provided and is arranged upstream with respect to the error microphone 702. The reference microphone 102 may be arranged on the outside of the earphone 116 such that the reference microphone 102 receives the actual noise of the environment. As the error microphone 702 is arranged on the inside of the earphone 116 of the headset, the error microphone 702 receives the noise a user of the headset may perceive.
  • In operation of the device 700, the reference microphone 102 records a noise signal 118 and outputs a reference microphone signal 122 which is converted by the ADC 104, yielding a delayed signal 124. This signal 124 is filtered by the digital filter 106, and the digitally filtered signal 126 is converted by the DAC 108, yielding a delayed signal 128. The noise reduction signal 120 is played via the loudspeaker 110. The error microphone 702 receives an error signal 708 which is a combination of the ambient noise signal 706 and the noise reduction signal 120. The error signal 708 is then converted by the ADC 704 and forms a digital error signal 710 to be used for operating the digital filter part 112.
  • The frequency dependency of the ANR active performance G(ω) of the device 700 is shown in Fig. 8 for different delays Δ. Again, G(ω) reads G ω = 10 log 10 Φ d ω - 10 log 10 Φ e ω ,
    Figure imgb0002

    with Φs(ω) denoting the PSD of the error microphone signal 708 and Φ d (ω) denoting the PSD of the ambient noise signal 706 at the error microphone 702.
  • Curves 802-808 correspond to a delay Δ of zero samples, eight samples, 16 samples, and 26 samples using a sampling rate of 48 kHz. For convenience, a reference ANR performance for an analog, instantaneous first-order low pass filter indicated is indicated by a curve 810, the parameters of which have been optimised in a similar manner. Upon increasing the delay Δ the active performance considerably degrades. In case of the (unrealistic) delay-free conversion indicated by the curve 802, the ANR performance G(ω) is high. However, upon increasing the delay Δ (curves 802-808), the gain becomes less negative meaning a lower noise reduction.
  • Fig. 9 shows the corresponding sample index dependency of the impulse response of the digital filter 106 for the delay Δ being zero samples, eight samples, 16 samples, and 26 samples (curves 902-908) for only the first 200 samples, in order to understand the performance degradation of the device 700. Due to the delay Δ the first Δ samples of the impulse response curves 902-908 are equal to zero. Upon increasing the delay Δ the acausal part of the impulse response corresponding to the zero values at low sample indices becomes longer. Thus the corresponding part of the optimal delay-free impulse response (curve 902) cannot be achieved by a causal digital filter 106, and the ANR performance of the device 700 is degraded.
  • In the following, a method of optimizing the operation of the device 700 will be explained. Under the assumption of the digital filter 106 being a L-taps finite impulse response (FIR) filter 106, minimizing the sound level at the error microphone 702 corresponds to minimizing a least-square cost function of the device 700, namely J w FIR = Ω D a ω + S a ω X a ω w T g FIR ω exp - iΔω 2 ω ,
    Figure imgb0003

    with wFIE denoting the digital FIR filter 106, Da (ω) denoting the ambient noise 706 perceived by the user, S a (ω) denoting the acoustical path 130 assuming a linear model, and Xa (ω) denoting the reference microphone signal 122 received by the reference microphone 102. In this context, the function gFIR (ω) equals [1 exp(-lω) ... exp (-t(L - 1)ω] T. Integration is performed over a frequency range Ω of interest.
    Minimization of the cost function results in optimal operational parameters of the digital filter 106, given the acoustical path 130 (without conversion delay Δ) and the delay Δ.
  • Fig. 10 shows a hybrid ANR device 1000 according to another exemplary embodiment of the invention. The device 1000 comprises a reference microphone 102, an analog filter 502, a parallel circuit 508 comprising an ADC 104, a digital filter 106, and a DAC 108 in one branch line and a gain unit 504 in a further bypass branch line 505, a signal adding unit 506, and a loudspeaker 110. A sequence of arrangement of these device components is seen in a signal transmitting direction. The device 1000 comprises an error microphone 702 and a further ADC 704.
  • When implementing the device 1000 in a headset, the reference microphone 102 is arranged on the outside of an earphone 116 of the headset, and the error microphone 702 and the loudspeaker 110 are arranged on the inside of an earphone 116 of the headset.
  • In operation of the device 1000, a noise signal 118 is received by the reference microphone 102 and transmitted to the analog filter 502. After an analog filtering operation the filtered microphone signal 510 is fed into the parallel circuit 508 such that the filtered microphone signal 510 is on the one hand converted into the digital domain, filtered by the digital filter 126 and converted back to the analog domain. Simultaneously, the filtered microphone signal 510 is bypassed over the gain unit 504. The amplified microphone signal 512 and the digitally filtered microphone signal 128 are summed by the signal adding unit 506 to form a filtered microphone signal 514. A noise reduction signal 120 is emitted by the loudspeaker 110. The error microphone 702 receives an ambient noise signal 706 and the noise reduction signal 120. An error signal 708 being transmitted by the error microphone 702 is fed to a further ADC 704. A converted signal 710 may be used for parameter optimization of the device 1000.
  • A method for determining a first operational parameter of the device 1000 according to another exemplary embodiment of the invention is based on minimizing a cost function describing characteristics of the device 1000. The cost function associated to the characteristics of the device 1000 reads J w FIR p a = Ω D a ω + S a ω X a ω H a ω w FIR T g FIR ω exp - iΔω + K 2 ω
    Figure imgb0004

    with the notations given above, pa denoting a vector describing the operational parameters of the analog filter 502, Ha (ω) denoting the transfer function of the instantaneous filter 502, and K describing the gain unit 504. As already stated, the kernel function gFIR (ω) equals g FIR ω = 1 exp exp - i L - 1 ω
    Figure imgb0005

    with L being the number of taps of the digital filter 106 (mathematical notation wFIR ).
    Optimizing the cost function may be performed jointly, computing the optimal operational parameters of the analog gain unit 504 (parameter K) and of the digital filter 106 (parameter w FIR ) based on the analog filter 502 (parameter pa ).
  • Minimisation of the cost function with the transfer Ha (ω) being assumed to be known yields optimal values for the parameter vector wH = [K ; wFIR ] which is a concatenation of the gain K and the digital filter coefficients WFIR , namely w H = - Q R - 1 Ω R g ω X a ω S a ω H a ω D a * ω
    Figure imgb0006

    with R {...} denoting a real part of the function {...}.
    Further, QR and g(ω) are defined by the following formulas Q R = Ω g ω g ω H X a ω 2 S a ω 2 H a ω 2
    Figure imgb0007

    and g ω = 1 g FIR ω exp - iΔω ,
    Figure imgb0008

    respectively.
  • In the following, a method for determining an operational parameter of a hybrid ANR device according to another exemplary embodiment of the invention will be described.
  • Fig. 11 shows a known hybrid ANR device 1100 comprising a feedforward configuration. The device 1100 is based on the device 700 with further comprising a parallel circuit 508 being part of the filter unit 114. A first branch of the parallel circuit 508 corresponds to the arrangement of the ADC 104, the digital filter 106, and the DAC 108. A second branch of the parallel circuit 508 comprises an analog filter 502 and a gain unit 504 being provided downstream with respect to the analog filter 502. Output signals of the two branches are summed by the signal adding unit 506. The error microphone 702 may be replaced by a temporary measurement microphone.
  • In operation of the device 1100, the reference microphone 102 records a noise signal 118 and feeds a reference microphone signal 122 to the parallel circuit 508. The signal 122 is filtered by the digital filter 106 in the digital domain and meanwhile filterd by the analog filter 502 and amplified by the gain unit 504. After signal summation a filtered microphone signal 514 is provided to the loudspeaker 110 which outputs a noise reduction signal 120. Further, the error microphone 702 records a combination of an ambient noise signal 706 and the noise reduction signal 120 and outputs an error signal 708 to the further ADC 104.
  • The device 1100 combines the instantaneous filter response of the analog filter 502 with the filter accuracy and complexity of the digital filter 106. Since the analog filter 502 is able to perform an instantaneous filtering operation, the acausal part of the impulse response of the digital filter 106 may be crudely modelled such that the ANR performance of the device 1100 is largely robust with respect to the presence of delays ΔADC and ΔADC of the ADC 104 and the DAC 108, respectively.
  • Fig. 12 shows a frequency dependency of the active ANR performance G(ω) of the hybrid device 1100 for different delay values Δ being zero samples, eight samples, 16 samples, and 26 samples indicated by curves 1202-1208. For convenience, the active performance of an analog first-order low pass filter is indicated by a curve 1210. It can be observed that the ANR performance is largely maintained for increasing values of the delay Δ, with only a slight degradation occurring in a frequency region between about 300 Hz and about 1000 Hz.
  • Fig. 13 shows the corresponding sample index dependency of the impulse response of the filter unit 114 (sum of the filter response of the analog filter 502 with gain unit 504 and the filter response of the digital filter 106) for the delays Δ being zero samples, eight samples, 16 samples, and 26 samples (curves 1302-1308). The acausal part of the impulse response is represented by a thick portion of the curves 1302-1308 and may be clearly modelled by exponentially decreasing functions. These functions are the impulse responses of the analog first-order low pass filter 502.
  • The method mentioned above is adapted for optimizing the operation of the device 1100. Two operational parameters of the device 1100 are jointly computed using minimization of a cost function of the device 1100 with respect to the two operational parameters to be determined, namely the cost function J w FIR p a = Ω D a ω + S a ω X a ω w FIR T g FIR ω exp - iΔω + K H a ω 2 ω
    Figure imgb0009

    with the denotations given above. Assuming an analog first-order low pass filter 502, the transfer function of the analog filter 502 is given by the equation H a ω = 1 1 + iωτ ,
    Figure imgb0010
    with τ
    being the delay of the analog filter 502.
  • Minimisation of the cost function with the transfer Ha (ω) being assumed to be known yields optimal values for the parameter vector wH = [K ; wFIR ] which is a concatenation of the gain K and the digital filter coefficients wFIR , namely w H = - Q R - 1 Ω R g ω X a ω S a ω D a * ω
    Figure imgb0011

    with R{...} denoting a real part of the function {...}.
  • Further, QR and g(ω) are defined by the following formulas Q R = Ω g ω g ω H X a ω 2 S a ω 2
    Figure imgb0012

    and g ω = H a ω g FIR ω exp ( - ω ,
    Figure imgb0013

    respectively.
  • For an easier implementation, it may be convenient to fix τ to a predetermined value and only optimise the gain K in combination with the digital filter coefficients wFIR .
    Thus, given the reference microphone signal 122, the ambient noise signal 706 recorded on the error microphone 702, an estimate of the acoustical path 130, the length of the codec delay Δ, and the impulse response of the analog filter 502, it is possible to determine the optimal gain parameters K of the analog gain unit 504 and the optimal FIR filter wFIR of the digital filter 106 of the hybrid device 1100. It is also possible to use further algorithms for computing the parameters such as an adaptive least mean square based algorithm.
  • If the error microphone 702 is absent and replaced by a temporary measurement microphone, optimisation of the parameters may then be performed offline, wherein the filter coefficients and the gain parameter may remain fixed during normal operation of the device 1100.
  • Finally, it should be noted that the above-mentioned embodiments illustrate rather than limit the invention, and that those skilled in the art will be capable of designing many alternative embodiments without departing from the scope of the invention as defined by the appended claims. In the claims, any reference signs placed in parentheses shall not be construed as limiting the claims. The word "comprising" and "comprises", and the like, does not exclude the presence of elements or steps other than those listed in any claim or the specification as a whole. The singular reference of an element does not exclude the plural reference of such elements and vice-versa. In a device claim enumerating several means, several of these means may be embodied by one and the same item of software or hardware. The mere fact that certain measures are recited in mutually different dependent claims does not indicate that a combination of these measures cannot be used to advantage.
  • It should be noted that the term "comprising" does not exclude other elements or steps and "a" or "an" does not exclude a plurality. Also elements described in association with different embodiments may be combined. It should also be noted that reference signs in the claims should not be construed as limiting the scope of the claims.

Claims (17)

  1. A hybrid active noise reduction device for reducing environmental noise, the device (500; 1000) comprising
    a microphone (102) for receiving a noise signal (118) and for transmitting a microphone signal (122);
    a filter unit (114) for receiving the microphone signal (122) and for transmitting a filtered microphone signal (514), the filter unit (114) comprising an analog filter part (501) and a digital filter part (112), the analog filter part (501) and the digital filter part (112) being arranged in series to one another; and
    a loudspeaker (110) for transmitting a noise reduction signal (120) based on the filtered microphone signal (514).
  2. The device of claim 1,
    further comprising a bypass line (505) being arranged in parallel to the digital filter part (112).
  3. The device of claim 2,
    further comprising a signal adding unit (506) for adding a bypassed signal (512) and a digitally filtered signal (128).
  4. The device of claim 2,
    wherein the bypass line (505) comprises a gain unit (504).
  5. The device of claim 2,
    wherein the signal adding unit (506) is adapted to sum the bypassed signal (512) and the digitally filtered signal (128) in an analog way.
  6. The device of claim 1,
    wherein the analog filter part (501) is arranged downstream with respect to the digital filter part (112).
  7. The device of claim 1,
    wherein the analog filter part (501) is arranged upstream with respect to the digital filter part (112).
  8. The device of claim 1,
    wherein the digital filter part (112) comprises an analog-to-digital convertor (104) for converting an analog signal into a digital signal, a digital filter (106), and a digital-to-analog convertor (108) for converting a digital signal into an analog signal.
  9. The device of claim 1,
    further comprising a further microphone (702) for receiving a further noise signal (706) and for transmitting a further microphone signal (708), wherein the analog filter part (501) and/or the digital filter part (112) operate based on the further microphone signal (708).
  10. The device of claim 1,
    wherein the digital filter part (112) comprises a digital filter (106), wherein the digital filter (106) is a finite impulse response filter.
  11. The device of claim 1,
    wherein the analog filter part (501) comprises an analog filter (502), wherein the analog filter (502) is a first order low pass filter.
  12. A method for determining an operational parameter of a hybrid active noise reduction device (500; 1000; 1100), the active noise reduction device (500; 1000; 1100) comprising a microphone (102) for receiving a noise signal (118) and for transmitting a microphone signal (122), a filter unit (114) for receiving the microphone signal (122) and for transmitting a filtered microphone signal (514), the filter unit (114) comprising an analog filter part (501) and a digital filter part (112), and a loudspeaker (110) for transmitting a noise reduction signal (120) based on the filtered microphone signal (514),
    the method comprising selecting a first operational parameter of the device (500; 1000; 1100) and determining a second operational parameter of the device (500; 1000; 1100) based on the first operational parameter.
  13. The method of claim 12,
    wherein the device (500; 1000; 1100) further comprises a bypass line (505), the bypass line (505) being arranged in parallel to the digital filter part (112) and comprising a gain unit (504), wherein the method comprises selecting the first operational parameter and determining a second operational parameter and a third operational parameter of the device (500; 1000; 1100) based on the first operational parameter.
  14. The method of claim 13,
    wherein the first operational parameter is an operational parameter of the analog filter part (501), wherein the second operational parameter is an operational parameter of the digital filter part (112), and wherein the third operational parameter is an operational parameter of the gain unit (504).
  15. The method of claim 12,
    wherein determining the second operational parameter based on the first operational parameter comprises minimizing a cost function of the device (500; 1000; 1100) with respect to the second operational parameter.
  16. The method of claim 13,
    wherein determining the second operational parameter and the third operational parameter based on the first operational parameter comprises minimizing a cost function of the device (500; 1000; 1100) with respect to the second operational parameter and the third operational parameter.
  17. A program element, which, when being executed by a processor, is adapted to control or carry out a method of claim 12.
EP09161866A 2009-06-03 2009-06-03 Hybrid active noise reduction device for reducing environmental noise, method for determining an operational parameter of a hybrid active noise reduction device, and program element Withdrawn EP2259250A1 (en)

Priority Applications (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
EP09161866A EP2259250A1 (en) 2009-06-03 2009-06-03 Hybrid active noise reduction device for reducing environmental noise, method for determining an operational parameter of a hybrid active noise reduction device, and program element
PCT/IB2010/052475 WO2010140133A2 (en) 2009-06-03 2010-06-03 Hybrid active noise reduction device for reducing environmental noise, method for determining an operational parameter of a hybrid active noise reduction device, and program element

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
EP09161866A EP2259250A1 (en) 2009-06-03 2009-06-03 Hybrid active noise reduction device for reducing environmental noise, method for determining an operational parameter of a hybrid active noise reduction device, and program element

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP2259250A1 true EP2259250A1 (en) 2010-12-08

Family

ID=42145179

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP09161866A Withdrawn EP2259250A1 (en) 2009-06-03 2009-06-03 Hybrid active noise reduction device for reducing environmental noise, method for determining an operational parameter of a hybrid active noise reduction device, and program element

Country Status (2)

Country Link
EP (1) EP2259250A1 (en)
WO (1) WO2010140133A2 (en)

Cited By (15)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2010140133A2 (en) * 2009-06-03 2010-12-09 Nxp B.V. Hybrid active noise reduction device for reducing environmental noise, method for determining an operational parameter of a hybrid active noise reduction device, and program element
WO2013108096A1 (en) * 2012-01-16 2013-07-25 Telefonaktiebolaget L M Ericsson (Publ) Radio frequency digital filter group delay mismatch reduction
CN105393301A (en) * 2013-06-11 2016-03-09 伯斯有限公司 Controlling stability in anr devices
WO2016198481A3 (en) * 2015-06-09 2017-01-12 Cirrus Logic International Semiconductor Limited Hybrid finite impulse response filter
US9711130B2 (en) 2011-06-03 2017-07-18 Cirrus Logic, Inc. Adaptive noise canceling architecture for a personal audio device
US9721556B2 (en) 2012-05-10 2017-08-01 Cirrus Logic, Inc. Downlink tone detection and adaptation of a secondary path response model in an adaptive noise canceling system
US9773493B1 (en) 2012-09-14 2017-09-26 Cirrus Logic, Inc. Power management of adaptive noise cancellation (ANC) in a personal audio device
US9773490B2 (en) 2012-05-10 2017-09-26 Cirrus Logic, Inc. Source audio acoustic leakage detection and management in an adaptive noise canceling system
US9807503B1 (en) 2014-09-03 2017-10-31 Cirrus Logic, Inc. Systems and methods for use of adaptive secondary path estimate to control equalization in an audio device
US9824677B2 (en) 2011-06-03 2017-11-21 Cirrus Logic, Inc. Bandlimiting anti-noise in personal audio devices having adaptive noise cancellation (ANC)
US9955250B2 (en) 2013-03-14 2018-04-24 Cirrus Logic, Inc. Low-latency multi-driver adaptive noise canceling (ANC) system for a personal audio device
US10013966B2 (en) 2016-03-15 2018-07-03 Cirrus Logic, Inc. Systems and methods for adaptive active noise cancellation for multiple-driver personal audio device
US10026388B2 (en) 2015-08-20 2018-07-17 Cirrus Logic, Inc. Feedback adaptive noise cancellation (ANC) controller and method having a feedback response partially provided by a fixed-response filter
US10219071B2 (en) 2013-12-10 2019-02-26 Cirrus Logic, Inc. Systems and methods for bandlimiting anti-noise in personal audio devices having adaptive noise cancellation
US10468048B2 (en) 2011-06-03 2019-11-05 Cirrus Logic, Inc. Mic covering detection in personal audio devices

Families Citing this family (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US8873606B2 (en) * 2012-11-07 2014-10-28 Broadcom Corporation Transceiver including a high latency communication channel and a low latency communication channel
US11468874B2 (en) * 2020-11-13 2022-10-11 Google Llc Noise control system

Citations (8)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
GB2222733A (en) * 1988-09-07 1990-03-14 Topexpress Ltd Digital filter with parallel analogue path
WO1994007212A1 (en) * 1992-09-21 1994-03-31 Noise Cancellation Technologies, Inc. Sampled-data filter with low delay
US5440642A (en) 1993-09-20 1995-08-08 Denenberg; Jeffrey N. Analog noise cancellation system using digital optimizing of variable parameters
US5774564A (en) * 1993-10-13 1998-06-30 Sharp Kabushiki Kaisha Active controller using lattice-type filter and active control method
US20010036283A1 (en) * 2000-03-07 2001-11-01 Mark Donaldson Active noise reduction system
US20040240677A1 (en) * 2003-05-29 2004-12-02 Masahide Onishi Active noise control system
US20070098119A1 (en) * 2003-05-14 2007-05-03 Ian Stothers Adaptive control unit with feedback compensation
US20080112570A1 (en) * 2006-11-13 2008-05-15 Sony Corporation Filter circuit for noise cancellation, noise reduction signal production method and noise canceling system

Family Cites Families (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP2259250A1 (en) * 2009-06-03 2010-12-08 Nxp B.V. Hybrid active noise reduction device for reducing environmental noise, method for determining an operational parameter of a hybrid active noise reduction device, and program element

Patent Citations (8)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
GB2222733A (en) * 1988-09-07 1990-03-14 Topexpress Ltd Digital filter with parallel analogue path
WO1994007212A1 (en) * 1992-09-21 1994-03-31 Noise Cancellation Technologies, Inc. Sampled-data filter with low delay
US5440642A (en) 1993-09-20 1995-08-08 Denenberg; Jeffrey N. Analog noise cancellation system using digital optimizing of variable parameters
US5774564A (en) * 1993-10-13 1998-06-30 Sharp Kabushiki Kaisha Active controller using lattice-type filter and active control method
US20010036283A1 (en) * 2000-03-07 2001-11-01 Mark Donaldson Active noise reduction system
US20070098119A1 (en) * 2003-05-14 2007-05-03 Ian Stothers Adaptive control unit with feedback compensation
US20040240677A1 (en) * 2003-05-29 2004-12-02 Masahide Onishi Active noise control system
US20080112570A1 (en) * 2006-11-13 2008-05-15 Sony Corporation Filter circuit for noise cancellation, noise reduction signal production method and noise canceling system

Cited By (19)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2010140133A3 (en) * 2009-06-03 2011-06-30 Nxp B.V. Hybrid active noise reduction device for reducing environmental noise, method for determining an operational parameter of a hybrid active noise reduction device, and program element
WO2010140133A2 (en) * 2009-06-03 2010-12-09 Nxp B.V. Hybrid active noise reduction device for reducing environmental noise, method for determining an operational parameter of a hybrid active noise reduction device, and program element
US9824677B2 (en) 2011-06-03 2017-11-21 Cirrus Logic, Inc. Bandlimiting anti-noise in personal audio devices having adaptive noise cancellation (ANC)
US10468048B2 (en) 2011-06-03 2019-11-05 Cirrus Logic, Inc. Mic covering detection in personal audio devices
US10249284B2 (en) 2011-06-03 2019-04-02 Cirrus Logic, Inc. Bandlimiting anti-noise in personal audio devices having adaptive noise cancellation (ANC)
US9711130B2 (en) 2011-06-03 2017-07-18 Cirrus Logic, Inc. Adaptive noise canceling architecture for a personal audio device
WO2013108096A1 (en) * 2012-01-16 2013-07-25 Telefonaktiebolaget L M Ericsson (Publ) Radio frequency digital filter group delay mismatch reduction
US9020065B2 (en) 2012-01-16 2015-04-28 Telefonaktiebolaget L M Ericsson (Publ) Radio frequency digital filter group delay mismatch reduction
US9721556B2 (en) 2012-05-10 2017-08-01 Cirrus Logic, Inc. Downlink tone detection and adaptation of a secondary path response model in an adaptive noise canceling system
US9773490B2 (en) 2012-05-10 2017-09-26 Cirrus Logic, Inc. Source audio acoustic leakage detection and management in an adaptive noise canceling system
US9773493B1 (en) 2012-09-14 2017-09-26 Cirrus Logic, Inc. Power management of adaptive noise cancellation (ANC) in a personal audio device
US9955250B2 (en) 2013-03-14 2018-04-24 Cirrus Logic, Inc. Low-latency multi-driver adaptive noise canceling (ANC) system for a personal audio device
CN105393301B (en) * 2013-06-11 2019-05-31 伯斯有限公司 The method and ANR system of stability in ANR earphone are provided
CN105393301A (en) * 2013-06-11 2016-03-09 伯斯有限公司 Controlling stability in anr devices
US10219071B2 (en) 2013-12-10 2019-02-26 Cirrus Logic, Inc. Systems and methods for bandlimiting anti-noise in personal audio devices having adaptive noise cancellation
US9807503B1 (en) 2014-09-03 2017-10-31 Cirrus Logic, Inc. Systems and methods for use of adaptive secondary path estimate to control equalization in an audio device
WO2016198481A3 (en) * 2015-06-09 2017-01-12 Cirrus Logic International Semiconductor Limited Hybrid finite impulse response filter
US10026388B2 (en) 2015-08-20 2018-07-17 Cirrus Logic, Inc. Feedback adaptive noise cancellation (ANC) controller and method having a feedback response partially provided by a fixed-response filter
US10013966B2 (en) 2016-03-15 2018-07-03 Cirrus Logic, Inc. Systems and methods for adaptive active noise cancellation for multiple-driver personal audio device

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
WO2010140133A2 (en) 2010-12-09
WO2010140133A3 (en) 2011-06-30

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
EP2259250A1 (en) Hybrid active noise reduction device for reducing environmental noise, method for determining an operational parameter of a hybrid active noise reduction device, and program element
TWI759652B (en) Electrical network for processing acoustic signals, method for real-time acoustic processing and active noise cancellation audio device
US8452022B2 (en) Digital filter circuit, digital filter program and noise canceling system
US10950213B1 (en) Hybrid active noise cancellation filter adaptation
US8611551B1 (en) Low latency active noise cancellation system
EP1970902B1 (en) Audio signal processing apparatus and signal processing method
EP1121834B1 (en) Hearing aids based on models of cochlear compression
JP5063528B2 (en) Noise cancellation system
JP6351538B2 (en) Multiband signal processor for digital acoustic signals.
US20160086618A1 (en) A method and apparatus for suppression of unwanted audio signals
JP2008250270A (en) Signal processing apparatus and signal processing method
US8948424B2 (en) Hearing device and method for operating a hearing device with two-stage transformation
JP2010157852A (en) Sound corrector, sound measurement device, sound reproducer, sound correction method, and sound measurement method
EP3486896B1 (en) Noise cancellation system and signal processing method
KR101901511B1 (en) A Method for Controlling a Noise in a Active Feedback Manner for a Headphone or Earphone and A System for Controlling a Noise by the Same
CN107666637B (en) Self-adjusting active noise elimination method and system and earphone device
CN110226200A (en) Signal processing apparatus, signal processing method and computer program
US11568850B2 (en) Sound input and output system and noise cancellation circuit
US20220124431A1 (en) Noise Canceling Headphones
US11151977B2 (en) Audio playback apparatus and method having a noise-canceling mechanism
US11942069B1 (en) Tools and methods for designing feedforward filters for use in active noise cancelling systems
US20230186890A1 (en) Audio processing device
JP2009232204A (en) Signal processing apparatus, and signal processing method
JPH06318086A (en) Noise controller

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO SE SI SK TR

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: THE APPLICATION IS DEEMED TO BE WITHDRAWN

18D Application deemed to be withdrawn

Effective date: 20110609