US20010038448A1 - Method of and device for detecting micro-scratches - Google Patents
Method of and device for detecting micro-scratches Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- US20010038448A1 US20010038448A1 US09/864,398 US86439801A US2001038448A1 US 20010038448 A1 US20010038448 A1 US 20010038448A1 US 86439801 A US86439801 A US 86439801A US 2001038448 A1 US2001038448 A1 US 2001038448A1
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- light
- wafer
- reflected
- mirror
- polarized light
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Granted
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H01—ELECTRIC ELEMENTS
- H01L—SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICES NOT COVERED BY CLASS H10
- H01L22/00—Testing or measuring during manufacture or treatment; Reliability measurements, i.e. testing of parts without further processing to modify the parts as such; Structural arrangements therefor
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01N—INVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
- G01N21/00—Investigating or analysing materials by the use of optical means, i.e. using sub-millimetre waves, infrared, visible or ultraviolet light
- G01N21/17—Systems in which incident light is modified in accordance with the properties of the material investigated
- G01N21/21—Polarisation-affecting properties
Definitions
- the present invention relates to a method of and to a device for detecting micro-scratches in a semiconductor wafer.
- CMP chemical and mechanical planarization
- GP global planarization
- FIG. 1 is a magnified view of the surface of a scratched wafer
- FIG. 2 is a cross-sectional view of a scratched wafer.
- scratches shaped like human eyebrows are formed on a wafer by CMP.
- the width of such a scratch is 0.3 to 3.0 ⁇ m
- the length thereof is 3 to 30 ⁇ m
- the depth thereof is about 200 to 2000 ⁇ .
- micro-scratches on the surface of a wafer can not be easily observed after CMP, the micro-scratches are enlarged during etching because weaker portions of the wafer bearing the micro-scratches are etched more heavily than the other portions of the wafer. The micro-scratches once so enlarged can be easily observed.
- the polyurethane polishing pad is porous and also produces micro-scratches in the wafer.
- the surface of the polishing pad has a roughness of several ⁇ m in virtue of the pores existing at the surface of the polishing pad. Slurry collects in the pores open at the surface of the polishing pad.
- stress is applied to the polishing pad by the wafer.
- polishing is performed by part of the slurry that exists at the surface of the wafer and in the pores of the pad. During this process, large silica particles lodged in the pores of the polishing pad scratch the surface of the wafer.
- Conventional methods for detecting scratches include a method of irradiating monochrome laser light onto a surface and detecting the sizes of scratches in the surface using the light scattered from the surface, a method using scattered light from dies and detecting the scratches by a die-to-die signal processing, and a method of obtaining a highly-magnified video image of a surface using white light as an optical source and detecting scratches in the surface using the signal difference between pixels of the video camera.
- An object of the present invention is to provide a method by which defects such as micro-scratches in a wafer can be effectively detected, and to provide a device for doing the same. That is, an object of the present invention is to provide a method of and a device for detecting micro-scratches, which method and device provide a high recognition rate of wafer defects and which allow the presence of such defects to be promptly confirmed.
- the present invention provides a method of detecting micro-scratches, in which the surface of a wafer is scanned with light from a light source while the light remains incident upon the surface of the wafer at a predetermined angle, the light reflected by normal portions of the surface ( i.e., at an angle of reflection substantially identical to that of the angle of incidence) propagates to an optical detector, the light received by the optical detector is used to generate an electrical signal indicative of the intensity of the received light, values are assigned to the electric signal in correspondence with the intensity of the light represented thereby, and whether defects are formed at the surface of the wafer is determined by comparing the values assigned to the electrical signal to each other.
- the light reflected by the surface of the wafer is divided into s polarized light and p polarized light, and the electrical signal is obtained from the s polarized light and/or the p polarized light.
- the method also preferably takes measures to lengthen the optical path along which light travels from the light source to the wafer and/or from the surface of the wafer to the optical detector, thereby allowing flexibility in design for providing an appropriate angle of incidence.
- measures include bending the light by reflection and/or refraction.
- the method includes a step of adjustably controlling the angle of incidence.
- the measures taken to lengthen the optical path cause the light to be confined in a first space located between the light source and the wafer and in a second discrete space located between the surface of the wafer and the optical detector. In this case, the light is reflected several times in each of the discrete spaces.
- the present invention also provides a device for detecting micro-scratches, including a wafer stage, an optical system which produces light directed onto the wafer, a scanning mechanism which moves the optical system and the stage relative to one another so that the light is scanned across the wafer, a signal detection system which receives the light reflected by the wafer and converts the reflected light into an electrical signal, and a signal analysis system which analyzes the electrical signal.
- the optical system includes a light source, and light produced by the light source is directed onto the wafer surface at a predetermined angle.
- the signal detection system which receives the reflected light generates an electrical signal indicative of the intensity thereof.
- the signal analysis system compares values of the electrical signal with reference to different portions of the wafer surface which are scanned by the light, and this comparison yields a determination of whether defects have been formed in the surface of the wafer.
- the signal detection system may include a polarization element which divides the reflected light into s polarized light and p polarized light, and polarized light detectors for converting the polarized light into electrical signals.
- the signal analysis system preferably determines from these electrical signals whether micro-scratches are present in the surface of the wafer.
- a grazing optical system for lengthening the optical path is provided between the optical system and the wafer and between the wafer and the signal detection system.
- the grazing optical system has first and second mirrors disposed parallel to each other and perpendicular to the planar surface of the wafer.
- the light source projects light onto one of the mirrors at a predetermined angle of incidence, and light is reflected from one of the mirrors onto the surface of the wafer.
- a third mirror may be provided for reflecting light from the light source onto one of the first and second mirrors.
- the inclination of the reflective surface of the third mirror is adjustable so that the third mirror controls the direction of the incident light.
- a fourth mirror may be interposed between the first and second mirrors.
- the fourth and first mirrors coact and the second and fourth mirrors coact to confine the light to first and second discrete spaces, respectively. That is, the path along which light travels from the light source to the wafer, and the path along which the light reflected by the wafer travels to the signal detection system are separate from one another.
- FIG. 1 is a magnified view of the surface of a scratched wafer
- FIG. 2 is a magnified sectional view of a scratched wafer
- FIG. 3 is a block diagram of a first embodiment of a device for detecting micro-scratches according to the present invention
- FIG. 4 is a schematic diagram illustrating the relationship between the optical system and the signal detection system of the first embodiment of the device for detecting micro-scratches according to the present invention
- FIG. 5 is a block diagram of an optical detection system of a second embodiment of a device for detecting micro-scratches according to the present invention.
- FIG. 6 is a graph showing variations in the reflectivity (Rs) of s polarized light and the reflectivity (Rp) of p polarized light in Simulation 1 according to the present invention
- FIG. 7 is a graph showing variations in the reflectivity (Rp) of the p polarized light wave in Simulation 2 according to the present invention.
- FIG. 8 is a graph showing variations in the reflectivity (Rs) of the s polarized light in Simulation 2 according to the present invention.
- FIG. 9 is a graph showing variations in the ratio of the reflectivity (Rp) of the p polarized light to the reflectivity (Rs) of the s polarized light in a state where an underlying pattern layer has been considered, in Simulation 2 according to the present invention
- FIG. 10 is a graph showing variations in signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and variations in the reflectivity (Rp) of p polarized light with respect to the incidence angle, in Simulation 3 according to the present invention
- FIG. 11 is a graph showing variations in SNR and variations in the reflectivity (Rs) of s polarized light with respect to the incidence angle, in Simulation 3 according to the present invention.
- FIG. 12 is a graph showing variations in SNR and variations in the ratio of the reflectivity (Rp) of p polarized light to the reflectivity (Rs) of s polarized light with respect to the incidence angle, in Simulation 3 according to the present invention
- FIG. 13 is a schematic diagram showing the direction in which a wafer surface in which micro-scratches are formed is scanned, in Simulation 4 according to the present invention
- FIG. 14 is a graph showing variations in the ratio of the reflectivity (Rp) of the p polarized light to the reflectivity (Rs) of the s polarized light with respect to variations in incidence angle, in Simulation 4 according to the present invention
- FIG. 15 is a schematic diagram showing the direction in which a wafer surface in which micro-scratches are formed is scanned, in Simulation 5 according to the present invention.
- FIG. 16 is a graph showing variations in the ratio of the reflectivity (Rp) of the p polarized light to the reflectivity (Rs) of the s polarized light with respect to variations in incidence angle, in a state where a pattern layer under a medium layer has been considered, in Simulation 5 according to the present invention;
- FIG. 17 is a diagram showing the results of scanning of a wafer surface in Simulation 5 according to the present invention.
- FIG. 18 is a schematic diagram of a third embodiment of a device for detecting micro-scratches according to the present invention.
- FIG. 19 is a schematic diagram of a fourth embodiment of a device for detecting micro-scratches according to the present invention.
- FIG. 20 is a schematic diagram of a fifth embodiment of a device for detecting micro-scratches according to the present invention.
- FIG. 21 is a schematic diagram of a sixth embodiment of a device for detecting micro-scratches according to the present invention.
- FIG. 22 is a schematic diagram of a seventh embodiment of a device for detecting micro-scratches according to the present invention.
- FIG. 23 is a schematic diagram of an eighth embodiment of a device for detecting micro-scratches according to the present invention.
- FIG. 24 is a schematic diagram of a ninth embodiment of a device for detecting micro-scratches according to the present invention.
- a wafer handler 1 can transfer a wafer to be examined to and from a stage 2 .
- An optical system 3 irradiates light onto the wafer supported by the stage 2 .
- a signal detection system 4 detects the light which is reflected by the wafer and converts the reflected light into an electrical signal.
- a signal analysis system 5 determines whether the surface of the wafer has been scratched, using the electrical signal generated by the signal detection system 4 .
- a measurement control system 6 controls items which are associated with several types of measurements including the optical system 3 .
- a processor 7 such as a computer controls all of the above-mentioned systems.
- the optical system 3 includes a light source which generates light ranging in wavelength from deep ultraviolet (DUV) to infrared.
- the signal detection system 4 and the signal analysis system 8 are configured according to the wavelength of light produced by the light source.
- white light, monochrome light or light of a predetermined color radiating from the light source of the optical system 3 is incident upon the surface of the wafer 100 to be examined, at a predetermined incidence angle ( ⁇ i ).
- Light reflected by the wafer 100 is incident upon the signal detection system 4 .
- the signal detection system 4 is provided at a location where only light reflected by the surface of wafer 100 would propagate, i.e., the signal detection system 4 will receive only a minimum amount of scattered light. In fact, preferably none of any light scattered from the surface of the wafer falls upon the signal detection system 4 .
- the signal detection system 4 includes an optical detector for converting incident light into an electrical signal.
- the incidence angle ( ⁇ i ) is within a range where most of the light from the optical system 3 will be reflected, and is selected based on the refractive index (n) of a target material layer (medium) at the surface of a wafer under examination.
- the incidence angle ( ⁇ i ) is greater than 0 and less than 90 degrees.
- FIG. 5 illustrates an optical detection system 4 of a second embodiment of the present invention.
- light which is output from the optical system 3 and reflected by the surface of a wafer is incident upon a beam splitter 41 of the optical detection system 4 .
- the beam splitter 41 is inclined at a predetermined angle with respect to an optical axis 44 .
- P polarized light is incident upon a P polarization detector 42 via the beam splitter 41
- S polarized light is reflected by the beam splitter 41 so as to fall upon an S polarization detector 43 .
- a photo array detector or a CCD camera can be used as the P polarization detector 42 and the S polarization detector 43 .
- An electrical signal obtained by the signal detection system 4 is supplied to the signal analysis system 5 .
- the signal analysis system 5 determines whether micro-scratches have been produced in specific areas of a wafer surface, using the received electrical signal.
- This simulation studies the variation in reflectivity with respect to the variation in incidence angle of light upon a medium layer at a wafer surface under the conditions below.
- the incidence angle ( ⁇ i ) varies between 0 and 90 degrees
- the light has a wavelength of 632.8 nm
- silicon oxide having a refractive index (n) of 1.462 was used as the medium layer formed at the wafer surface.
- the signal detection system of the embodiment of FIG. 5 was used, whereby the reflected light was split into p polarized light waves and s polarized light waves.
- Equation 1 The reflectivity (Rs) of the s polarized light waves and the reflectivity (Rp) of the p polarized light waves with respect to the medium layer are defined by Equations 1 and 2 according to Snell's law:
- ⁇ n denotes the angle of refraction of light within a medium.
- the reflectivity (Rs) of s polarized light increases with an increase in incidence angle ( ⁇ i), and sharply increases particularly when the incidence angle ( ⁇ i) exceeds 70 degrees. Also, the reflectivity (Rp) of p polarized light decreases up to where the incidence angle ( ⁇ i) is 65 degrees, and then sharply increases after this point.
- the angle at which the reflectivity (Rp) of p polarized light is minimum is Brewster's angle at which most of incident light passes through the medium.
- the incidence angle ( ⁇ i) is greater than a predetermined value, particularly, when the p polarized light is incident at an angle which is greater than Brewster's angle, particularly, at least 85 degrees, light incident upon a medium layer is mostly reflected. Therefore, such light is particularly useful for detecting defects such as micro-scratches in the surface of the medium layer. That is, if the angle of incidence is kept at least 85 degrees, defects can be detected based on the amount of light incident upon the signal detection system 4 .
- the light is reflected by a normal portion of the surface of the target medium layer, nearly all of the reflected light falls on the signal detection system 4 , but if the light is scattered by defects such as micro-scratches in the layer, only part of the scattered light falls on the signal detection system 4 .
- This simulation examines the effect that an underlying layer pattern has upon the variation in reflectivity with respect to the variation in incidence angle ( ⁇ i) when an underlying layer pattern exists under the target medium layer on the surface of a wafer. Using these results, this simulation also serves to examine the effect that the underlying layer pattern has on the detection of micro-scratches in the surface of the target medium layer.
- the optical incidence angle ( ⁇ i) ranges from 0 to 90 degrees
- the incident light has a wavelength of 632.8 nm
- silicon oxide having a thickness of 10000 to 13000 ⁇ and a refractive index (n) of 1.462 was used as the medium layer formed at the wafer surface.
- the pattern layer under the medium layer had a thickness of 35000 ⁇
- the refractive indices of the pattern layer and a substrate were 1.3402 and 3.8806, respectively.
- FIG. 7 shows variations in the reflectivity (Rp) of the p polarized light
- FIG. 8 shows variations in the reflectivity (Rs) of the s polarized light.
- contribution ratio denotes a ratio of the reflectivity of the medium layer to the reflectivity when the underlying pattern layer has been considered. A large contribution ratio indicates that the underlying pattern layer exerts only a small influence on the reflectivity of the medium layer.
- the reflectivity of p polarized light when the underlying pattern has been considered decreases when the incidence angle is between 0 and 50 degrees, and does not appear when the incidence angle is 50 degrees or more.
- the surface reflectivity of the medium layer gradually decreases as the incidence angle increases from 0 to 50 degrees, but gradually increases for incidence angles of 50 degrees or more, and sharply increases from 80 degrees. Also, the contribution ratio is greatly lowered around the Brewster's angle and reaches nearly 100% at an incidence angle of 70 degrees or more.
- the contribution ratio increases with an increase in the incidence angle ( ⁇ i), and is 90% or more when the incidence angle is 80 degrees or more.
- FIG. 9 shows variations in the ratio of the reflectivity (Rp) of the p polarized light to the reflectivity (Rs) of the s polarized light, in a state where an underlying pattern layer has been considered.
- the reflectivity ratio (Rp/Rs) decreases together with the contribution ratio as the incidence angle ( ⁇ i) increases, and sharply increases as the incidence angle increases from 50 degrees.
- the contribution ratio of the reflectivity (Rp) of the p polarized light is more stable than the contribution ratio of the reflectivity (Rs) of the s polarized light and that of the ratio (Rp/Rs) of the reflectivity of the p polarized light to the reflectivity of the s polarized light.
- the contribution ratio of the reflectivity (Rp) of the p polarized light is high over a wide range. This shows that p polarized light is advantageous in detecting micro-scratches in a medium layer.
- Simulation 3 examines the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of the surface reflectivity of a medium layer with respect to the change in the pattern of an underlying pattern layer and the variation in incidence angle ( ⁇ i) when the lower pattern layer is provided under the medium layer on a wafer surface.
- SNR signal-to-noise ratio
- the optical incidence angle ( ⁇ i) ranges from 0 to 90 degrees
- the light has a wavelength of 632.8 nm
- silicon oxide having a thickness of 1000 to 13000 ⁇ and a refractive index (n) of 1.462 was used as the medium layer which is formed on the wafer surface.
- the pattern layer under the medium layer has a thickness of 35000 ⁇
- the refractive indices of the pattern layer and a substrate were 1.3402 and 3.8806, respectively.
- the reflectivity was measured for different thicknesses of the medium layer of between 10000 ⁇ 0 to 13000 ⁇ increased by increments of 30 ⁇ .
- the SNR denotes the ratio of the mean of reflectivity to the variation in reflectivity with respect to the variation in the thickness of the medium layer.
- the variation in the reflectivity of p polarized light becomes smaller than the mean of the reflectivity from when the incidence angle is 70 degrees.
- the SNR sharply increases.
- the SNR increases as the variations in the reflectivity of s polarized light and the incidence angle increase. Particularly, the SNR is 300% or more from when the incidence angle is 85 degrees or greater.
- the SNR of the reflectivity (Rp) of the p polarized light is more stable than the SNR of the reflectivity (Rs) of the s polarized light and the SNR of the ratio (Rp/Rs) of the reflectivity of the p polarized light to the reflectivity of the s polarized light.
- the SNR of the reflectivity (Rp) of the p polarized light is high over a wide range. This shows that p polarized light can be useful in detecting micro-scratches in a medium layer.
- Simulation 4 examines a variation in the amount of light reflected at micro-scratches in a medium layer formed on the surface of a wafer, with a variation in incidence angle.
- the incidence angle ranges from 45.9 to 64.2 degrees
- the wavelength of the incident light is 632.8 nm
- the incident light was scanned over a distance of 5 ⁇ m in a direction of crossing a micro-scratch 101 formed in a medium layer of a wafer 100 as shown in FIG. 13.
- the size of a light spot was set to be 5 ⁇ 10 ⁇ m.
- reflectivity ratios Data 1 and Data 2 denote ratios of the reflectivity of p polarized light to the reflectivity of s polarized light.
- Simulation 5 examines an actually-measured value when areas damaged by micro-scratches are scanned using a micro-scratch detection device according to the present invention.
- the incidence angle was fixed at 65.07 degrees
- the wavelength of the incident light was 632.8 nm
- the scanning intervals in the directions of the horizontal axis and the vertical axis were set to be 5 ⁇ m and 10 ⁇ m, respectively.
- the incident light was scanned across a micro-scratch 101 formed in a medium layer of a wafer 100 , as shown in FIG. 15.
- the size of the light spot with respect to the medium layer was set to be 5 ⁇ 10 ⁇ m.
- a change (B) in the ratio of the reflectivity of p polarized light to the reflectivity of s polarized light starts occurring at portions damaged by micro-scratches, and the magnitude of the change gradually increases.
- a radical change (A) in reflectivity ratio which appears at low incidence angles depends on a change in the thickness of a pattern layer under the medium layer.
- FIG. 17 is an image of the result of scanning a wafer surface using the aforementioned device.
- any appropriate mechanism 102 known, per se can be used to move the wafer stage 2 and the optical system 3 relative to one another so that the light is scanned across the wafer. It can be seen from FIG. 17 that the ratio (Rp/Rs) of reflection by micro-scratches in a medium layer of a wafer greatly varies with an increase in incidence angle, and the sensitivity of detection of micro-scratches greatly increases accordingly.
- the present invention can detect the presence of micro-scratches in a wafer surface by maintaining an appropriate optical incidence angle with respect to the wafer surface.
- the reflected light is divided into s polarized light and p polarized light, and a signal was generated based on the polarized light.
- the p polarized light was shown to be more useful in indicating the presence of micro-scratches.
- s polarized light when both s polarized light and p polarized light was kept at an incidence angle greater than a predetermined incidence angle, micro-scratches in a medium layer were capable of being observed without interference of reflected light from a pattern layer under the medium layer.
- p polarized light is more appropriate for monitoring for micro-scratches in a wafer surface
- s polarized light can also be used therefor.
- micro-scratches in the surface of a wafer can be undoubtedly detected by converting reflected light into electrical signals without polarizing the reflected light.
- FIG. 18 shows such a structure.
- a grazing optical system 5 is provided between an optical system 3 and a signal detection system 4 .
- the grazing optical system 5 causes light from the optical system 3 to fall upon the surface of a wafer 100 at a large angle, and transmits light which has been reflected by the wafer 100 to the signal detection system 4 .
- the grazing optical system 5 is disposed in an optical path between the optical system 3 and the signal detection system 4 , and reflects light from the optical system 3 several times and directs the reflected light toward the surface of the wafer 100 , and also reflects light reflected by the wafer 100 several times and directs the reflected light toward the signal detection system 4 .
- the grazing optical system 5 includes first and second mirrors 51 and 52 which are parallel to each other. Light from the optical system 3 is firstly reflected by the second mirror 52 , and then proceeds toward the first mirror 51 . Light reflected by the first mirror 51 proceeds back toward the second mirror 52 . Light escapes from the first and second mirrors 51 and 52 through this repetition of reflection, and falls on the wafer 100 . Light which has been reflected by the wafer 100 is again incident upon the first mirror 51 and reflected to the second mirror 52 . The light from the wafer 100 is reflected several times between the first and second mirrors 51 and 52 as described above, and thus escapes from the first and second mirrors 51 and 52 and propagates toward the signal detection system 4 .
- FIG. 19 shows another embodiment of the present invention in which a grazing optical system 5 is provided between the optical system 3 and the signal detection system 4 .
- a third mirror 53 establishes the angle at which light from the optical system 3 falls on the wafer 1 00 .
- Light from the optical system 3 falls upon the second mirror 52 via the third mirror 53 .
- the optical system 3 and the signal detection system 4 may be placed on the same side.
- the third mirror 53 may be fixed at one place.
- the third mirror 53 may be rotatable about an axis 531 such that the angle of incidence can be varied. Accordingly, the angle of reflection can also vary.
- the rotatable mount of the third mirror 53 allows the inclination of the third mirror 53 to be easily correctable.
- FIG. 20 shows still another embodiment of the present invention in which a grazing optical system 5 is provided between the optical system 3 and the signal detection system 4 .
- the grazing optical system 5 of FIG. 20 includes a third mirror 53 a , e.g., a parabolic mirror, which focuses light onto the second mirror 52 .
- the light focusing mirror 53 a compensates for the divergence of light due to the extended optical distance between the optical system 3 and the surface of the wafer 100 .
- the third mirror 53 a has a focusing power which corresponds to the optical distance, and accordingly can form a spot of a desired size on the surface of the wafer 100 .
- FIGS. 21, 22 and 23 show further embodiments, respectively, of a micro-scratch detection device according to the present invention, in which a grazing optical system 5 is provided between the optical system 3 and the signal detection system 4 .
- the embodiments shown in FIGS. 21, 22 and 23 are similar to one another in that a fourth mirror 54 is provided between the first and second mirrors 51 and 52 .
- the fourth mirror 54 separates and makes discrete from one another the path along which light travels toward the wafer 100 and the path along which light travels once reflected by the wafer.
- first 51 , second 52 and fourth 54 mirrors are positioned relative to each other such that the first 51 and fourth 54 mirrors coact to confine the light to a first space located between the optical system 3 and the wafer 100 , and that the fourth 54 and second 52 mirrors coact to confine the light to a second space, discrete from the first space, located between the signal detection system 4 and the wafer 100 .
- the grazing optical system 5 shown in FIG. 21 is an application of the embodiment of the grazing optical system 5 shown in FIG. 18.
- the grazing optical system 5 shown in FIG. 22 is an application of the embodiment of the grazing optical system 5 shown in FIG. 19.
- the grazing optical system 5 shown in FIG. 23 is obviously an application of the embodiment of the grazing optical system 5 shown in FIG. 20. Therefore, a detailed description of the operation of the detection devices shown in FIGS. 21 - 23 is unnecessary.
- FIG. 24 shows another embodiment of a micro-scratch detection device according to the present invention.
- a transparent part of the first mirror 51 extends upward to the extent that the light 31 is incident upon a surface thereof at an incidence angle of ⁇ 1 .
- This light passes through the first mirror 51 and is refracted at an angle of refraction ⁇ 2 corresponding to the refractive index of the transparent part of the mirror 51 .
- the refracted light then travels between the first mirror 51 and the second (or fourth) mirror 52 ( 54 ). Accordingly, the light which travels toward the second (fourth) mirror 52 ( 54 ) is reflected several times and then finally reaches the wafer 100 at an angle of incidence of ⁇ 2 .
- the angle of incidence ⁇ 1 at the upper transparent part of the mirror 51 is preferably designed to correspond to Brewster's angle so that most of the light passes through the upper part of the first mirror 51 .
- micro-scratches formed on the surface of a wafer can be successfully detected.
- defects such as micro-scratches formed in the surface of a medium layer can be detected regardless of the structure under the medium layer such as a pattern layer.
Abstract
A method and device detect for the presence of defects, namely micro-scratches, in the surface of a wafer. Light is projected onto a medium at the surface of the wafer, at an angle at which light is not reflected by another layer that may be located under the medium. Light reflected by the surface of the wafer is converted into an electrical signal but any light scattered by the surface is excluded as much as possible from contributing to the formation of the signal. The electric signal corresponds to the intensity of the light reflected from the surface of the wafer. As the light is scanned across the wafer, the values of the electric signal are compared to yield a determination of whether defects are present in the medium. Because the light projected onto the surface of the wafer will be scattered by defects such as micro-scratches, the wafer can be successfully monitored for the existence of such micro-scratches. In particular, defects including micro-scratches formed in the medium can be detected regardless of the structure underlying the medium, such as a pattern layer.
Description
- 1. Field of the Invention
- The present invention relates to a method of and to a device for detecting micro-scratches in a semiconductor wafer.
- 2. Description of the Related Art
- In the manufacturing of semiconductor devices, chemical and mechanical planarization (CMP) is a global planarization (GP) process for polishing a wafer. In CMP, slurry is sprayed onto the wafer and the wafer is polished with the slurry using a polyurethane polishing pad. The slurry contains silica particles as an abrasive. Some of the silica particles have a diameter equal to or greater than 1 μm which greatly exceeds the average diameter of the silica particles making up the slurry. These large particles apply abnormal stresses to the wafer during polishing. Portions of the wafer to which abnormal stresses have been applied fracture to relieve the stress.
- FIG. 1 is a magnified view of the surface of a scratched wafer, and FIG. 2 is a cross-sectional view of a scratched wafer.
- As shown in FIG. 1, scratches shaped like human eyebrows are formed on a wafer by CMP. Generally, the width of such a scratch is 0.3 to 3.0 μm, the length thereof is 3 to 30 μm, and the depth thereof is about 200 to 2000 Å. Although micro-scratches on the surface of a wafer can not be easily observed after CMP, the micro-scratches are enlarged during etching because weaker portions of the wafer bearing the micro-scratches are etched more heavily than the other portions of the wafer. The micro-scratches once so enlarged can be easily observed.
- It is known that even when large silica particles account for only about 0.1% of the slurry, a large number of scratches are produced. However, it is difficult to remove large silica particles from the slurry, and to measure the amount of the large silica particles.
- Moreover, the polyurethane polishing pad is porous and also produces micro-scratches in the wafer. The surface of the polishing pad has a roughness of several μm in virtue of the pores existing at the surface of the polishing pad. Slurry collects in the pores open at the surface of the polishing pad. When polishing is started in this state, stress is applied to the polishing pad by the wafer. Thus, polishing is performed by part of the slurry that exists at the surface of the wafer and in the pores of the pad. During this process, large silica particles lodged in the pores of the polishing pad scratch the surface of the wafer.
- Conventional methods for detecting scratches include a method of irradiating monochrome laser light onto a surface and detecting the sizes of scratches in the surface using the light scattered from the surface, a method using scattered light from dies and detecting the scratches by a die-to-die signal processing, and a method of obtaining a highly-magnified video image of a surface using white light as an optical source and detecting scratches in the surface using the signal difference between pixels of the video camera.
- However, these conventional methods of detecting scratches or defects in a wafer cannot effectively detect micro-scratches since they do not possess a high enough degree of resolution or an accurate enough image recognition ability.
- An object of the present invention is to provide a method by which defects such as micro-scratches in a wafer can be effectively detected, and to provide a device for doing the same. That is, an object of the present invention is to provide a method of and a device for detecting micro-scratches, which method and device provide a high recognition rate of wafer defects and which allow the presence of such defects to be promptly confirmed.
- To achieve this object, the present invention provides a method of detecting micro-scratches, in which the surface of a wafer is scanned with light from a light source while the light remains incident upon the surface of the wafer at a predetermined angle, the light reflected by normal portions of the surface ( i.e., at an angle of reflection substantially identical to that of the angle of incidence) propagates to an optical detector, the light received by the optical detector is used to generate an electrical signal indicative of the intensity of the received light, values are assigned to the electric signal in correspondence with the intensity of the light represented thereby, and whether defects are formed at the surface of the wafer is determined by comparing the values assigned to the electrical signal to each other.
- Preferably, the light reflected by the surface of the wafer is divided into s polarized light and p polarized light, and the electrical signal is obtained from the s polarized light and/or the p polarized light.
- Furthermore, the method also preferably takes measures to lengthen the optical path along which light travels from the light source to the wafer and/or from the surface of the wafer to the optical detector, thereby allowing flexibility in design for providing an appropriate angle of incidence. Such measures include bending the light by reflection and/or refraction. Moreover, the method includes a step of adjustably controlling the angle of incidence.
- It is also preferable that the measures taken to lengthen the optical path cause the light to be confined in a first space located between the light source and the wafer and in a second discrete space located between the surface of the wafer and the optical detector. In this case, the light is reflected several times in each of the discrete spaces.
- The present invention also provides a device for detecting micro-scratches, including a wafer stage, an optical system which produces light directed onto the wafer, a scanning mechanism which moves the optical system and the stage relative to one another so that the light is scanned across the wafer, a signal detection system which receives the light reflected by the wafer and converts the reflected light into an electrical signal, and a signal analysis system which analyzes the electrical signal. The optical system includes a light source, and light produced by the light source is directed onto the wafer surface at a predetermined angle. The signal detection system which receives the reflected light generates an electrical signal indicative of the intensity thereof. The signal analysis system compares values of the electrical signal with reference to different portions of the wafer surface which are scanned by the light, and this comparison yields a determination of whether defects have been formed in the surface of the wafer.
- Furthermore, the signal detection system may include a polarization element which divides the reflected light into s polarized light and p polarized light, and polarized light detectors for converting the polarized light into electrical signals. The signal analysis system preferably determines from these electrical signals whether micro-scratches are present in the surface of the wafer.
- A grazing optical system for lengthening the optical path is provided between the optical system and the wafer and between the wafer and the signal detection system. The grazing optical system has first and second mirrors disposed parallel to each other and perpendicular to the planar surface of the wafer. The light source projects light onto one of the mirrors at a predetermined angle of incidence, and light is reflected from one of the mirrors onto the surface of the wafer.
- A third mirror may be provided for reflecting light from the light source onto one of the first and second mirrors. The inclination of the reflective surface of the third mirror is adjustable so that the third mirror controls the direction of the incident light.
- Still further, a fourth mirror may be interposed between the first and second mirrors. In this case, the fourth and first mirrors coact and the second and fourth mirrors coact to confine the light to first and second discrete spaces, respectively. That is, the path along which light travels from the light source to the wafer, and the path along which the light reflected by the wafer travels to the signal detection system are separate from one another.
- The above and other objects, features and advantages of the present invention will become more apparent by referring to the following detailed description of preferred embodiments thereof made with reference to the attached drawings, of which:
- FIG. 1 is a magnified view of the surface of a scratched wafer;
- FIG. 2 is a magnified sectional view of a scratched wafer;
- FIG. 3 is a block diagram of a first embodiment of a device for detecting micro-scratches according to the present invention;
- FIG. 4 is a schematic diagram illustrating the relationship between the optical system and the signal detection system of the first embodiment of the device for detecting micro-scratches according to the present invention;
- FIG. 5 is a block diagram of an optical detection system of a second embodiment of a device for detecting micro-scratches according to the present invention;
- FIG. 6 is a graph showing variations in the reflectivity (Rs) of s polarized light and the reflectivity (Rp) of p polarized light in
Simulation 1 according to the present invention; - FIG. 7 is a graph showing variations in the reflectivity (Rp) of the p polarized light wave in
Simulation 2 according to the present invention; - FIG. 8 is a graph showing variations in the reflectivity (Rs) of the s polarized light in
Simulation 2 according to the present invention; - FIG. 9 is a graph showing variations in the ratio of the reflectivity (Rp) of the p polarized light to the reflectivity (Rs) of the s polarized light in a state where an underlying pattern layer has been considered, in
Simulation 2 according to the present invention; - FIG. 10 is a graph showing variations in signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and variations in the reflectivity (Rp) of p polarized light with respect to the incidence angle, in
Simulation 3 according to the present invention; - FIG. 11 is a graph showing variations in SNR and variations in the reflectivity (Rs) of s polarized light with respect to the incidence angle, in
Simulation 3 according to the present invention; - FIG. 12 is a graph showing variations in SNR and variations in the ratio of the reflectivity (Rp) of p polarized light to the reflectivity (Rs) of s polarized light with respect to the incidence angle, in
Simulation 3 according to the present invention; - FIG. 13 is a schematic diagram showing the direction in which a wafer surface in which micro-scratches are formed is scanned, in
Simulation 4 according to the present invention; - FIG. 14 is a graph showing variations in the ratio of the reflectivity (Rp) of the p polarized light to the reflectivity (Rs) of the s polarized light with respect to variations in incidence angle, in
Simulation 4 according to the present invention; - FIG. 15 is a schematic diagram showing the direction in which a wafer surface in which micro-scratches are formed is scanned, in
Simulation 5 according to the present invention; - FIG. 16 is a graph showing variations in the ratio of the reflectivity (Rp) of the p polarized light to the reflectivity (Rs) of the s polarized light with respect to variations in incidence angle, in a state where a pattern layer under a medium layer has been considered, in
Simulation 5 according to the present invention; - FIG. 17 is a diagram showing the results of scanning of a wafer surface in
Simulation 5 according to the present invention; - FIG. 18 is a schematic diagram of a third embodiment of a device for detecting micro-scratches according to the present invention;
- FIG. 19 is a schematic diagram of a fourth embodiment of a device for detecting micro-scratches according to the present invention;
- FIG. 20 is a schematic diagram of a fifth embodiment of a device for detecting micro-scratches according to the present invention;
- FIG. 21 is a schematic diagram of a sixth embodiment of a device for detecting micro-scratches according to the present invention;
- FIG. 22 is a schematic diagram of a seventh embodiment of a device for detecting micro-scratches according to the present invention;
- FIG. 23 is a schematic diagram of an eighth embodiment of a device for detecting micro-scratches according to the present invention; and
- FIG. 24 is a schematic diagram of a ninth embodiment of a device for detecting micro-scratches according to the present invention.
- Referring to FIG. 3, a
wafer handler 1 can transfer a wafer to be examined to and from astage 2. Anoptical system 3 irradiates light onto the wafer supported by thestage 2. Asignal detection system 4 detects the light which is reflected by the wafer and converts the reflected light into an electrical signal. Asignal analysis system 5 determines whether the surface of the wafer has been scratched, using the electrical signal generated by thesignal detection system 4. Ameasurement control system 6 controls items which are associated with several types of measurements including theoptical system 3. Aprocessor 7 such as a computer controls all of the above-mentioned systems. - The
optical system 3 includes a light source which generates light ranging in wavelength from deep ultraviolet (DUV) to infrared. Thesignal detection system 4 and the signal analysis system 8 are configured according to the wavelength of light produced by the light source. - Referring now to FIG. 4, white light, monochrome light or light of a predetermined color radiating from the light source of the
optical system 3 is incident upon the surface of thewafer 100 to be examined, at a predetermined incidence angle (θi). Light reflected by thewafer 100 is incident upon thesignal detection system 4. - The
signal detection system 4 is provided at a location where only light reflected by the surface ofwafer 100 would propagate, i.e., thesignal detection system 4 will receive only a minimum amount of scattered light. In fact, preferably none of any light scattered from the surface of the wafer falls upon thesignal detection system 4. Thesignal detection system 4 includes an optical detector for converting incident light into an electrical signal. - The incidence angle (θi) is within a range where most of the light from the
optical system 3 will be reflected, and is selected based on the refractive index (n) of a target material layer (medium) at the surface of a wafer under examination. Here, the incidence angle (θi) is greater than 0 and less than 90 degrees. - FIG. 5 illustrates an
optical detection system 4 of a second embodiment of the present invention. Referring to FIG. 5, light which is output from theoptical system 3 and reflected by the surface of a wafer is incident upon abeam splitter 41 of theoptical detection system 4. Thebeam splitter 41 is inclined at a predetermined angle with respect to anoptical axis 44. Among the incident light, P polarized light is incident upon aP polarization detector 42 via thebeam splitter 41, and S polarized light is reflected by thebeam splitter 41 so as to fall upon anS polarization detector 43. Here, a photo array detector or a CCD camera can be used as theP polarization detector 42 and theS polarization detector 43. - An electrical signal obtained by the
signal detection system 4 is supplied to thesignal analysis system 5. Thesignal analysis system 5 determines whether micro-scratches have been produced in specific areas of a wafer surface, using the received electrical signal. - This simulation studies the variation in reflectivity with respect to the variation in incidence angle of light upon a medium layer at a wafer surface under the conditions below. In this simulation, the incidence angle (θi) varies between 0 and 90 degrees, the light has a wavelength of 632.8 nm, and silicon oxide having a refractive index (n) of 1.462 was used as the medium layer formed at the wafer surface. Also, the signal detection system of the embodiment of FIG. 5 was used, whereby the reflected light was split into p polarized light waves and s polarized light waves.
- The reflectivity (Rs) of the s polarized light waves and the reflectivity (Rp) of the p polarized light waves with respect to the medium layer are defined by
Equations - Rs=±{((n×cos θn)−(1×cos θi))÷((n×cos θn)+(1×cos θi))} (1)
- Rp=±{((n÷cos θn)−(1÷cos θi))÷((n÷cos θn)+(1÷cos θi))} (2)
- wherein θn denotes the angle of refraction of light within a medium.
- The simulation performed under the above-described conditions resulted in variations in the reflectivity (Rs) of the s polarized light and the reflectivity (Rp) of the p polarized light as shown in FIG. 6.
- Referring to FIG. 6, the reflectivity (Rs) of s polarized light increases with an increase in incidence angle (θi), and sharply increases particularly when the incidence angle (θi) exceeds 70 degrees. Also, the reflectivity (Rp) of p polarized light decreases up to where the incidence angle (θi) is 65 degrees, and then sharply increases after this point. Here, the angle at which the reflectivity (Rp) of p polarized light is minimum is Brewster's angle at which most of incident light passes through the medium.
- According to these results, when the incidence angle (θi) is greater than a predetermined value, particularly, when the p polarized light is incident at an angle which is greater than Brewster's angle, particularly, at least 85 degrees, light incident upon a medium layer is mostly reflected. Therefore, such light is particularly useful for detecting defects such as micro-scratches in the surface of the medium layer. That is, if the angle of incidence is kept at least 85 degrees, defects can be detected based on the amount of light incident upon the
signal detection system 4. More specifically, if the light is reflected by a normal portion of the surface of the target medium layer, nearly all of the reflected light falls on thesignal detection system 4, but if the light is scattered by defects such as micro-scratches in the layer, only part of the scattered light falls on thesignal detection system 4. - This simulation examines the effect that an underlying layer pattern has upon the variation in reflectivity with respect to the variation in incidence angle (θi) when an underlying layer pattern exists under the target medium layer on the surface of a wafer. Using these results, this simulation also serves to examine the effect that the underlying layer pattern has on the detection of micro-scratches in the surface of the target medium layer.
- In this simulation, the optical incidence angle (θi) ranges from 0 to 90 degrees, the incident light has a wavelength of 632.8 nm, and silicon oxide having a thickness of 10000 to 13000 Å and a refractive index (n) of 1.462 was used as the medium layer formed at the wafer surface. The pattern layer under the medium layer had a thickness of 35000 Å, and the refractive indices of the pattern layer and a substrate were 1.3402 and 3.8806, respectively.
-
Simulation 2 under the above-described conditions produced results such as those shown in FIGS. 7 through 9. FIG. 7 shows variations in the reflectivity (Rp) of the p polarized light, and FIG. 8 shows variations in the reflectivity (Rs) of the s polarized light. In FIGS. 7 and 8, the term contribution ratio denotes a ratio of the reflectivity of the medium layer to the reflectivity when the underlying pattern layer has been considered. A large contribution ratio indicates that the underlying pattern layer exerts only a small influence on the reflectivity of the medium layer. - As shown in FIG. 7, the reflectivity of p polarized light when the underlying pattern has been considered decreases when the incidence angle is between 0 and 50 degrees, and does not appear when the incidence angle is 50 degrees or more. The surface reflectivity of the medium layer gradually decreases as the incidence angle increases from 0 to 50 degrees, but gradually increases for incidence angles of 50 degrees or more, and sharply increases from 80 degrees. Also, the contribution ratio is greatly lowered around the Brewster's angle and reaches nearly 100% at an incidence angle of 70 degrees or more.
- As shown in FIG. 8, the contribution ratio increases with an increase in the incidence angle (θi), and is 90% or more when the incidence angle is 80 degrees or more.
- FIG. 9 shows variations in the ratio of the reflectivity (Rp) of the p polarized light to the reflectivity (Rs) of the s polarized light, in a state where an underlying pattern layer has been considered. As shown in FIG. 9, the reflectivity ratio (Rp/Rs) decreases together with the contribution ratio as the incidence angle (θi) increases, and sharply increases as the incidence angle increases from 50 degrees.
- According to
Simulation 2 as described above, the contribution ratio of the reflectivity (Rp) of the p polarized light is more stable than the contribution ratio of the reflectivity (Rs) of the s polarized light and that of the ratio (Rp/Rs) of the reflectivity of the p polarized light to the reflectivity of the s polarized light. The contribution ratio of the reflectivity (Rp) of the p polarized light is high over a wide range. This shows that p polarized light is advantageous in detecting micro-scratches in a medium layer. -
Simulation 3 examines the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of the surface reflectivity of a medium layer with respect to the change in the pattern of an underlying pattern layer and the variation in incidence angle (θi) when the lower pattern layer is provided under the medium layer on a wafer surface. - In
Simulation 3, the optical incidence angle (θi) ranges from 0 to 90 degrees, the light has a wavelength of 632.8 nm, and silicon oxide having a thickness of 1000 to 13000 Å and a refractive index (n) of 1.462 was used as the medium layer which is formed on the wafer surface. The pattern layer under the medium layer has a thickness of 35000 Å, and the refractive indices of the pattern layer and a substrate were 1.3402 and 3.8806, respectively. The reflectivity was measured for different thicknesses of the medium layer of between 10000 Å0 to 13000 Å increased by increments of 30 Å. Here, the SNR denotes the ratio of the mean of reflectivity to the variation in reflectivity with respect to the variation in the thickness of the medium layer. - Referring to FIG. 10, the variation in the reflectivity of p polarized light becomes smaller than the mean of the reflectivity from when the incidence angle is 70 degrees. Thus, the SNR sharply increases.
- Referring to FIG. 11, the SNR increases as the variations in the reflectivity of s polarized light and the incidence angle increase. Particularly, the SNR is 300% or more from when the incidence angle is 85 degrees or greater.
- Referring to FIG. 12, with an increase in the incidence angle to 50 or 60 degrees or greater, a variation in the ratio of the reflectivity (Rp) of p polarized light waves to the reflectivity (Rs) of s polarized light waves becomes much smaller than the mean of the reflectivity. Thus, the SNR sharply decreases.
- According to
Simulation 3 as described above, the SNR of the reflectivity (Rp) of the p polarized light is more stable than the SNR of the reflectivity (Rs) of the s polarized light and the SNR of the ratio (Rp/Rs) of the reflectivity of the p polarized light to the reflectivity of the s polarized light. The SNR of the reflectivity (Rp) of the p polarized light is high over a wide range. This shows that p polarized light can be useful in detecting micro-scratches in a medium layer. -
Simulation 4 examines a variation in the amount of light reflected at micro-scratches in a medium layer formed on the surface of a wafer, with a variation in incidence angle. InSimulation 4, the incidence angle ranges from 45.9 to 64.2 degrees, the wavelength of the incident light is 632.8 nm, and the incident light was scanned over a distance of 5 μm in a direction of crossing a micro-scratch 101 formed in a medium layer of awafer 100 as shown in FIG. 13. The size of a light spot was set to be 5×10 μm. - By using signal analysis, a corrected value was obtained by amplifying a
signal using Equation 3 defined with reflectivity ratios Data1 and Data2 which were obtained from two adjacent scanned portions: - corrected value=((|Data1−Data2|×10)^ 2)/10 (3)
- wherein reflectivity ratios Data1 and Data2 denote ratios of the reflectivity of p polarized light to the reflectivity of s polarized light.
- Referring to FIG. 14, with an increase in incidence angle, a change in the ratio of the reflectivity of p polarized light to the reflectivity of s polarized light starts occurring at portions damaged by micro-scratches, and the magnitude of the change gradually increases.
- It can be seen from FIG. 14 that the ratio (Rp/Rs) of reflection by micro-scratches in a medium layer of a wafer greatly varies with an increase in incidence angle, and the sensitivity of detection of micro-scratches greatly increases accordingly.
-
Simulation 5 examines an actually-measured value when areas damaged by micro-scratches are scanned using a micro-scratch detection device according to the present invention. InSimulation 5, the incidence angle was fixed at 65.07 degrees, the wavelength of the incident light was 632.8 nm, and the scanning intervals in the directions of the horizontal axis and the vertical axis were set to be 5 μm and 10 μm, respectively. The incident light was scanned across a micro-scratch 101 formed in a medium layer of awafer 100, as shown in FIG. 15. The size of the light spot with respect to the medium layer was set to be 5×10 μm. - Here, the ratio (Rp/Rs) of the reflectivity of p polarized light to the reflectivity of s polarized light was measured. By using signal analysis, a corrected value was obtained by amplifying a
signal using Equation 4 which is defined with reflectivity ratios Data1 and Data2 which were obtained from two adjacent scanned portions: - corrected value=((|Data1−Data2|×10)^ 10)/50 (4)
- Referring to FIG. 16, with an increase in incidence angle, a change (B) in the ratio of the reflectivity of p polarized light to the reflectivity of s polarized light starts occurring at portions damaged by micro-scratches, and the magnitude of the change gradually increases. In FIG. 16, a radical change (A) in reflectivity ratio which appears at low incidence angles depends on a change in the thickness of a pattern layer under the medium layer.
- FIG. 17 is an image of the result of scanning a wafer surface using the aforementioned device. Note, any
appropriate mechanism 102 known, per se, can be used to move thewafer stage 2 and theoptical system 3 relative to one another so that the light is scanned across the wafer. It can be seen from FIG. 17 that the ratio (Rp/Rs) of reflection by micro-scratches in a medium layer of a wafer greatly varies with an increase in incidence angle, and the sensitivity of detection of micro-scratches greatly increases accordingly. - That is, the present invention can detect the presence of micro-scratches in a wafer surface by maintaining an appropriate optical incidence angle with respect to the wafer surface.
- As described above, the reflected light is divided into s polarized light and p polarized light, and a signal was generated based on the polarized light. According to the results of simulations, the p polarized light was shown to be more useful in indicating the presence of micro-scratches. However, as described above, when both s polarized light and p polarized light was kept at an incidence angle greater than a predetermined incidence angle, micro-scratches in a medium layer were capable of being observed without interference of reflected light from a pattern layer under the medium layer. Hence, although p polarized light is more appropriate for monitoring for micro-scratches in a wafer surface, s polarized light can also be used therefor. Moreover, micro-scratches in the surface of a wafer can be undoubtedly detected by converting reflected light into electrical signals without polarizing the reflected light.
- As described above, it was found that larger incidence angles yield better results in monitoring for the presence of micro-scratches. However, as is evident from FIG. 4, an optical structure for directly irradiating light onto a
wafer 100 is limited in terms of how great of an incidence angle it can provide. That is, theoptical system 3 must be positioned closer to the surface of thewafer 100 as the incidence angle increases. However, it is difficult to design an optical system which can be positioned very close to the wafer surface, i.e., the design freedom of peripheral devices is severely compromised by such a requirement. The present invention overcomes this problem by providing a structure which allows theoptical system 3 to be located sufficiently far away from the wafer and yet irradiate the wafer with light at a sufficiently large optical angle of incidence. - FIG. 18 shows such a structure. In this embodiment, a grazing
optical system 5 is provided between anoptical system 3 and asignal detection system 4. With theoptical system 3 positioned a significant distance away from thewafer 100, the grazingoptical system 5 causes light from theoptical system 3 to fall upon the surface of awafer 100 at a large angle, and transmits light which has been reflected by thewafer 100 to thesignal detection system 4. - More specifically, the grazing
optical system 5 is disposed in an optical path between theoptical system 3 and thesignal detection system 4, and reflects light from theoptical system 3 several times and directs the reflected light toward the surface of thewafer 100, and also reflects light reflected by thewafer 100 several times and directs the reflected light toward thesignal detection system 4. - The grazing
optical system 5 includes first andsecond mirrors optical system 3 is firstly reflected by thesecond mirror 52, and then proceeds toward thefirst mirror 51. Light reflected by thefirst mirror 51 proceeds back toward thesecond mirror 52. Light escapes from the first andsecond mirrors wafer 100. Light which has been reflected by thewafer 100 is again incident upon thefirst mirror 51 and reflected to thesecond mirror 52. The light from thewafer 100 is reflected several times between the first andsecond mirrors second mirrors signal detection system 4. - FIG. 19 shows another embodiment of the present invention in which a grazing
optical system 5 is provided between theoptical system 3 and thesignal detection system 4. In this embodiment, athird mirror 53 establishes the angle at which light from theoptical system 3 falls on thewafer 1 00. Light from theoptical system 3 falls upon thesecond mirror 52 via thethird mirror 53. In such a structure, theoptical system 3 and thesignal detection system 4 may be placed on the same side. Thethird mirror 53 may be fixed at one place. Alternatively, thethird mirror 53 may be rotatable about anaxis 531 such that the angle of incidence can be varied. Accordingly, the angle of reflection can also vary. Also, the rotatable mount of thethird mirror 53 allows the inclination of thethird mirror 53 to be easily correctable. - FIG. 20 shows still another embodiment of the present invention in which a grazing
optical system 5 is provided between theoptical system 3 and thesignal detection system 4. The grazingoptical system 5 of FIG. 20 includes athird mirror 53 a, e.g., a parabolic mirror, which focuses light onto thesecond mirror 52. Thelight focusing mirror 53 a compensates for the divergence of light due to the extended optical distance between theoptical system 3 and the surface of thewafer 100. Also, thethird mirror 53 a has a focusing power which corresponds to the optical distance, and accordingly can form a spot of a desired size on the surface of thewafer 100. - FIGS. 21, 22 and23 show further embodiments, respectively, of a micro-scratch detection device according to the present invention, in which a grazing
optical system 5 is provided between theoptical system 3 and thesignal detection system 4. The embodiments shown in FIGS. 21, 22 and 23 are similar to one another in that afourth mirror 54 is provided between the first andsecond mirrors fourth mirror 54 separates and makes discrete from one another the path along which light travels toward thewafer 100 and the path along which light travels once reflected by the wafer. It can be seen from these figures that the first 51, second 52 and fourth 54 mirrors are positioned relative to each other such that the first 51 and fourth 54 mirrors coact to confine the light to a first space located between theoptical system 3 and thewafer 100, and that the fourth 54 and second 52 mirrors coact to confine the light to a second space, discrete from the first space, located between thesignal detection system 4 and thewafer 100. - The grazing
optical system 5 shown in FIG. 21 is an application of the embodiment of the grazingoptical system 5 shown in FIG. 18. Likewise, the grazingoptical system 5 shown in FIG. 22 is an application of the embodiment of the grazingoptical system 5 shown in FIG. 19. The grazingoptical system 5 shown in FIG. 23 is obviously an application of the embodiment of the grazingoptical system 5 shown in FIG. 20. Therefore, a detailed description of the operation of the detection devices shown in FIGS. 21-23 is unnecessary. - FIG. 24 shows another embodiment of a micro-scratch detection device according to the present invention. In this embodiment, a transparent part of the
first mirror 51 extends upward to the extent that the light 31 is incident upon a surface thereof at an incidence angle of θ1. This light passes through thefirst mirror 51 and is refracted at an angle of refraction θ2 corresponding to the refractive index of the transparent part of themirror 51. The refracted light then travels between thefirst mirror 51 and the second (or fourth) mirror 52 (54). Accordingly, the light which travels toward the second (fourth) mirror 52 (54) is reflected several times and then finally reaches thewafer 100 at an angle of incidence of θ2. Note, the angle of incidence θ1 at the upper transparent part of themirror 51 is preferably designed to correspond to Brewster's angle so that most of the light passes through the upper part of thefirst mirror 51. - According to the present invention as described above, micro-scratches formed on the surface of a wafer can be successfully detected. In particular, defects such as micro-scratches formed in the surface of a medium layer can be detected regardless of the structure under the medium layer such as a pattern layer.
- Finally, although the present invention has been described with reference to the preferred embodiments thereof, it will be apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art that the these embodiments may be changed or modified without departing from the true spirit and scope of the invention as defined by the appended claims.
Claims (36)
1. A method of detecting micro-scratches in a medium at the surface of a wafer, said method comprising the steps of:
directing light onto the surface of the wafer at a predetermined angle of incidence and scanning the light in a given direction across the surface while the angle of incidence is maintained;
detecting light reflected by the surface, at a predetermined angle of reflection, and generating an electrical signal representative of the intensity of the reflected light;
ascribing respective values to the electrical signal with reference to different portions of the surface from which the light scanning the surface is reflected, based on the intensity of the light reflected from said portions as represented by the electric signal; and
comparing the values ascribed to the electric signal to determine whether micro-scratches are present in the medium.
2. The method of , wherein the step of detecting the light comprises dividing the reflected light into s polarized light and p polarized light.
claim 1
3. The method of , wherein of the s polarized light and the p polarized light, the electrical signal is generated from only the p polarized light.
claim 2
4. The method of , wherein the electrical signal is generated from a ratio of the p polarized light to the s polarized light.
claim 2
5. The method of , wherein the steps of directing light onto the surface of the wafer and detecting the light reflected by the surface comprise positioning the wafer relative to a light source and a light detector, respectively, and further comprising the step of bending the light as the light travels from the light source to the surface of the wafer and/or from the surface of the wafer to the light detector, whereby the optical path of the light from the light source to the light detector is extended.
claim 1
6. The method of , wherein the step of bending the light comprises reflecting the light at least once in a space between the light source and the wafer before the light reaches the surface of the wafer.
claim 5
7. The method of , wherein the step of bending comprises controlling the angle at which the light is reflected in said space to thereby set said angle of incidence.
claim 5
8. The method of , wherein the step of bending comprises confining the light within a first space located between the light source and the surface of the wafer, confining the light within a second space, separate and discrete from the first space, located between the surface of the wafer and the light detector, and bending the light at least once in each of said first and second discrete spaces.
claim 5
9. The method of , wherein the step of bending comprises confining the light within a first space located between the light source and the surface of the wafer, confining the light within a second space, separate and discrete from the first space, located between the surface of the wafer and the light detector, and bending the light at least once in each of said first and second spaces.
claim 6
10. A method of detecting micro-scratches in a medium at the surface of a wafer, said method comprising the steps of:
positioning the wafer relative to a light source and a light detector;
reflecting light issuing from light source onto the wafer at a predetermined angle of incidence, including by reflecting the light several times in a space located between the surface of the wafer and the light source;
scanning the surface of the wafer with the light while the predetermined angle of incidence is maintained;
reflecting light, reflected by the surface of the wafer at a predetermined angle of reflection, several times in a space located between the wafer and the light detector;
detecting the light which has been reflected from the surface at said predetermined angle of reflection and then reflected several times, using the light detector;
generating an electrical signal representative of the intensity of the detected light;
ascribing respective values to the electrical signal with respect to different portions of the surface from which the light scanning the surface is reflected, based on the intensity of the light reflected from said portions as represented by the electric signal; and
comparing the values ascribed to the electric signal to determine whether micro-scratches are present in the medium.
11. The method of , wherein the step of detecting the light comprises dividing the reflected light into s polarized light and p polarized light.
claim 10
12. The method of , wherein of the s polarized light and the p polarized light, the electrical signal is generated from only the p polarized light.
claim 11
13. The method of , wherein the electrical signal is generated from a ratio of the p polarized light to the s polarized light.
claim 10
14. The method of , and further comprising the step of controlling the angle at which the light is reflected in said space located between the surface of the wafer and the light source to thereby set said angle of incidence.
claim 10
15. The method of , wherein the step of reflecting light issuing from the light source comprises confining the light to a first space located between the light source and the surface of the wafer, and the step of reflecting the light reflected by the surface of the wafer comprises confining the light to a second space, separate and discrete from the first space and located between the surface of the wafer and the light detector.
claim 14
16. The method of , wherein the step of reflecting light issuing from the light source comprises confining the light to a first space located between the light source and the surface of the wafer, and the step of reflecting the light reflected by the surface of the wafer comprises confining the light to a second space, separate and discrete from the first space and located between the surface of the wafer and the light detector.
claim 10
17. A device for detecting micro-scratches in a medium at the surface of a wafer, said device comprising:
a stage for supporting the wafer;
an optical system, including a light source, which directs light along an optical path extending to the stage, whereby the light falls at a predetermined angle of incidence upon a wafer supported by the stage;
scanning means for moving said stage and said optical system relative to another so that the light is scanned across the surface of a wafer supported by the stage while said predetermined angle of incidence is maintained;
a signal detection system which receives light which has been reflected at a predetermined angle of reflection by the surface of the wafer, and generates an electrical signal indicative of the intensity of the light; and
a signal analysis system which ascribes respective values to the electrical signal with reference to different portions of the surface from which the light scanning the surface is reflected, based on the intensity of the light reflected from said portions as represented by the electric signal, and which compares the values ascribed to the electric signal in a way that allows a determination of whether micro-scratches are present in the medium to be made.
18. The device of , wherein said signal detection system includes a polarizer which divides the reflected light into s polarized light and p polarized light, and at least one polarized light detector which converts at least one of the s polarized light and the p polarized light into an electrical signal representative of the intensity thereof.
claim 17
19. The device of , wherein said signal detection system comprises polarized light detectors which convert the s polarized light and the p polarized light into discrete electrical signals representative of the respective intensities thereof.
claim 18
20. The device of , wherein said signal analysis system calculates the ratio of a value ascribed to the electrical signal generated from the p polarized light to a value ascribed to the electrical signal generated from the s polarized light, in confirming the existence of micro-scratches in the medium.
claim 19
21. The device of , and further comprising at least one optical element which bends the light as the light travels from the light source to the surface of the wafer and/or from the surface of the wafer to the light detector, whereby the optical path of the light from the light source to the light detector is extended.
claim 17
22. The device of , wherein said at least one optical element comprises first and second mirrors extending parallel to each other and perpendicular to an upper wafer-supporting surface of said stage.
claim 21
23. The device of , wherein said optical system further comprises a third mirror optically interposed between said light source and one of said mirrors so as to reflect light propagating from said light source onto said one of said mirrors at a predetermined angle of incidence.
claim 21
24. The device of , wherein said third mirror is mounted in the optical system such that the inclination of the reflective surface thereof is adjustable, whereby said third mirror is repositionable to control the angle at which the light first falls upon said one of said mirrors.
claim 23
25. The device of , wherein said at least one optical element comprises first and second mirrors extending parallel to each other and perpendicular to an upper wafer-supporting surface of said stage, and another mirror interposed between said first and second mirrors, said mirrors being positioned relative to each other such that said first mirror and said another mirror coact to confine the light to a first space located between said light source and said stage, and said another mirror and said second mirror confine the light to a second space, discrete from said first space and located between said signal detection system and said stage.
claim 21
26. The device of , and further comprising a fourth mirror interposed between said first and second mirrors, said first, second and fourth mirrors being positioned relative to each other such that said first and said fourth mirror coact to confine the light to a first space located between said light source and said stage, and said fourth mirror and said second mirror confine the light to a second space, discrete from said first space, located between said signal detection system and said stage.
claim 23
27. A device for detecting micro-scratches in a medium at the surface of a wafer, said device comprising:
a stage for supporting the wafer;
a wafer handler operative to load and unload the wafer onto and from said stage;
an optical system, including a light source, which directs light along an optical path extending to the stage, whereby the light falls at a predetermined angle of incidence upon a wafer supported by the stage;
scanning means for moving said stage and said optical system relative to another so that the light is scanned across the surface of a wafer supported by the stage while said predetermined angle of incidence is maintained;
a signal detection system which receives light which has been reflected at a predetermined angle of reflection by the surface of the wafer, and generates an electrical signal indicative of the intensity of the light; and
a signal analysis system which ascribes respective values to the electrical signal with reference to different portions of the surface from which the light scanning the surface is reflected, based on the intensity of the light reflected from said portions as represented by the electric signal, and which compares the values ascribed to the electric signal in a way that allows a determination of whether micro-scratches are present in the medium to be made; and
a processor operatively connected to said optical and signal analysis control systems.
28. The device of , wherein said signal detection system includes a polarizer which divides the reflected light into s polarized light and p polarized light, and at least one polarized light detector which converts at least one of the s polarized light and the p polarized light into an electrical signal representative of the intensity thereof.
claim 27
29. The device of , wherein said signal detection system comprises polarized light detectors which convert the s polarized light and the p polarized light into discrete electrical signals representative of the respective intensities thereof.
claim 28
30. The device of , wherein said signal analysis system calculates the ratio of a value ascribed to the electrical signal generated from the p polarized light to a value ascribed to the electrical signal generated from the s polarized light, in confirming the existence of micro-scratches in the medium.
claim 29
31. The device of , and further comprising at least one optical element which bends the light as the light travels from the light source to the surface of the wafer and/or from the surface of the wafer to the light detector, whereby the optical path of the light from the light source to the light detector is extended.
claim 27
32. The device of , wherein said at least one optical element comprises first and second mirrors extending parallel to each other and perpendicular to an upper wafer-supporting surface of said stage.
claim 31
33. The device of , wherein said optical system further comprises a third mirror optically interposed between said light source and one of said mirrors so as to reflect light propagating from said light source onto said one of said mirrors at a predetermined angle of incidence.
claim 31
34. The device of , wherein said third mirror is mounted in the optical system such that the inclination of the reflective surface thereof is adjustable, whereby said third mirror is repositionable to control the angle at which the light first falls upon said one of said mirrors.
claim 33
35. The device of , wherein said at least one optical element comprises first and second mirrors extending parallel to each other and perpendicular to an upper wafer-supporting surface of said stage, and another mirror interposed between said first and second mirrors, said mirrors being positioned relative to each other such that said first mirror and said another mirror coact to confine the light to a first space located between said light source and said stage, and said another mirror and said second mirror confine the light to a second space, discrete from said first space and located between said signal detection system and said stage.
claim 31
36. The device of , and further comprising a fourth mirror interposed between said first and second mirrors, said first, second and fourth mirrors being positioned relative to each other such that said first and said fourth mirror coact to confine the light to a first space located between said light source and said stage, and said fourth mirror and said second mirror confine the light to a second space, discrete from said first space and located between said signal detection system and said stage.
claim 33
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US09/864,398 US6449037B2 (en) | 1999-08-23 | 2001-05-25 | Method of and device for detecting micro-scratches |
Applications Claiming Priority (4)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
KR1019990034927A KR100301067B1 (en) | 1999-08-23 | 1999-08-23 | Method for detecting micro scratch and device adopting the same |
KR99-34927 | 1999-08-23 | ||
US09/584,671 US6528333B1 (en) | 1999-08-23 | 2000-06-01 | Method of and device for detecting micro-scratches |
US09/864,398 US6449037B2 (en) | 1999-08-23 | 2001-05-25 | Method of and device for detecting micro-scratches |
Related Parent Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US09/584,671 Division US6528333B1 (en) | 1999-08-23 | 2000-06-01 | Method of and device for detecting micro-scratches |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
US20010038448A1 true US20010038448A1 (en) | 2001-11-08 |
US6449037B2 US6449037B2 (en) | 2002-09-10 |
Family
ID=19608278
Family Applications (2)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US09/584,671 Expired - Lifetime US6528333B1 (en) | 1999-08-23 | 2000-06-01 | Method of and device for detecting micro-scratches |
US09/864,398 Expired - Lifetime US6449037B2 (en) | 1999-08-23 | 2001-05-25 | Method of and device for detecting micro-scratches |
Family Applications Before (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US09/584,671 Expired - Lifetime US6528333B1 (en) | 1999-08-23 | 2000-06-01 | Method of and device for detecting micro-scratches |
Country Status (6)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (2) | US6528333B1 (en) |
JP (1) | JP4059334B2 (en) |
KR (1) | KR100301067B1 (en) |
CN (1) | CN1144038C (en) |
DE (1) | DE10041118A1 (en) |
GB (1) | GB2353592B (en) |
Cited By (8)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20070105377A1 (en) * | 2003-10-20 | 2007-05-10 | Novellus Systems, Inc. | Fabrication of semiconductor interconnect structure |
US7338908B1 (en) * | 2003-10-20 | 2008-03-04 | Novellus Systems, Inc. | Method for fabrication of semiconductor interconnect structure with reduced capacitance, leakage current, and improved breakdown voltage |
US7605082B1 (en) | 2005-10-13 | 2009-10-20 | Novellus Systems, Inc. | Capping before barrier-removal IC fabrication method |
US20100015805A1 (en) * | 2003-10-20 | 2010-01-21 | Novellus Systems, Inc. | Wet Etching Methods for Copper Removal and Planarization in Semiconductor Processing |
US20100029088A1 (en) * | 2003-10-20 | 2010-02-04 | Novellus Systems, Inc. | Modulated metal removal using localized wet etching |
US20110056913A1 (en) * | 2009-09-02 | 2011-03-10 | Mayer Steven T | Reduced isotropic etchant material consumption and waste generation |
US7972970B2 (en) | 2003-10-20 | 2011-07-05 | Novellus Systems, Inc. | Fabrication of semiconductor interconnect structure |
US8470191B2 (en) | 2003-10-20 | 2013-06-25 | Novellus Systems, Inc. | Topography reduction and control by selective accelerator removal |
Families Citing this family (30)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US6049220A (en) | 1998-06-10 | 2000-04-11 | Boxer Cross Incorporated | Apparatus and method for evaluating a wafer of semiconductor material |
DE10004889B4 (en) * | 2000-02-05 | 2004-05-27 | Basler Ag | Method and device for optically recognizing local deformations, in particular bubbles, in an object |
US6812047B1 (en) * | 2000-03-08 | 2004-11-02 | Boxer Cross, Inc. | Evaluating a geometric or material property of a multilayered structure |
US6911349B2 (en) * | 2001-02-16 | 2005-06-28 | Boxer Cross Inc. | Evaluating sidewall coverage in a semiconductor wafer |
US6717707B2 (en) * | 2001-02-21 | 2004-04-06 | Beyond 3, Inc. | Method and system for controlling resonance within a resonator-enhanced optical system |
US6971791B2 (en) * | 2002-03-01 | 2005-12-06 | Boxer Cross, Inc | Identifying defects in a conductive structure of a wafer, based on heat transfer therethrough |
US6958814B2 (en) * | 2002-03-01 | 2005-10-25 | Applied Materials, Inc. | Apparatus and method for measuring a property of a layer in a multilayered structure |
FR2839147B1 (en) * | 2002-04-30 | 2004-07-09 | Soitec Silicon On Insulator | DEVICE AND METHOD FOR AUTOMATICALLY CONTROLLING THE CONDITION OF THE PLATE SURFACE BY MEASURING THE ADHESIVE SPEED |
IL149557A (en) * | 2002-05-09 | 2008-11-03 | Nova Measuring Instr Ltd | Optical system operating with variable angle of incidence |
US6825487B2 (en) * | 2002-07-30 | 2004-11-30 | Seh America, Inc. | Method for isolation of wafer support-related crystal defects |
US6878559B2 (en) * | 2002-09-23 | 2005-04-12 | Applied Materials, Inc. | Measurement of lateral diffusion of diffused layers |
US6963393B2 (en) * | 2002-09-23 | 2005-11-08 | Applied Materials, Inc. | Measurement of lateral diffusion of diffused layers |
KR100556529B1 (en) * | 2003-08-18 | 2006-03-06 | 삼성전자주식회사 | Method for measuring thickness of multi-layer and apparatus for the same |
SE526617C2 (en) * | 2003-10-01 | 2005-10-18 | Sick Ivp Ab | System and method for mapping the properties of an object |
US7224471B2 (en) * | 2003-10-28 | 2007-05-29 | Timbre Technologies, Inc. | Azimuthal scanning of a structure formed on a semiconductor wafer |
US7026175B2 (en) * | 2004-03-29 | 2006-04-11 | Applied Materials, Inc. | High throughput measurement of via defects in interconnects |
US20080144036A1 (en) | 2006-12-19 | 2008-06-19 | Asml Netherlands B.V. | Method of measurement, an inspection apparatus and a lithographic apparatus |
US7791727B2 (en) * | 2004-08-16 | 2010-09-07 | Asml Netherlands B.V. | Method and apparatus for angular-resolved spectroscopic lithography characterization |
US7379185B2 (en) | 2004-11-01 | 2008-05-27 | Applied Materials, Inc. | Evaluation of openings in a dielectric layer |
US20060114478A1 (en) * | 2004-11-26 | 2006-06-01 | Applied Materials, Inc. | Evaluating effects of tilt angle in ion implantation |
US7319518B2 (en) * | 2005-08-24 | 2008-01-15 | Cree, Inc. | Double side polished wafer scratch inspection tool |
JP2009095903A (en) * | 2007-10-15 | 2009-05-07 | Disco Abrasive Syst Ltd | Grinder and scratch detection device |
DE102008008276B4 (en) | 2008-02-07 | 2013-05-29 | VISIT- Ingenieurbüro GmbH | Apparatus and method for detecting defects of monocrystalline or polycrystalline silicon wafers |
JP5007979B2 (en) * | 2008-05-22 | 2012-08-22 | 独立行政法人産業技術総合研究所 | Defect inspection method and defect inspection apparatus |
US8860314B2 (en) * | 2009-09-03 | 2014-10-14 | Koninklijke Philips N.V. | LED lamp |
CN105655267A (en) | 2016-01-04 | 2016-06-08 | 京东方科技集团股份有限公司 | Early-warning system for detecting substrates, and production equipment |
JP6791551B2 (en) * | 2016-11-01 | 2020-11-25 | 株式会社ディスコ | Grinding device |
KR102053103B1 (en) * | 2017-11-27 | 2019-12-06 | (주)소닉스 | Camera assembly for line scan |
CN108088656A (en) * | 2018-01-12 | 2018-05-29 | 深圳奥比中光科技有限公司 | A kind of monitoring device and method of optical element integrality |
CN115165758A (en) | 2018-07-06 | 2022-10-11 | 深圳中科飞测科技股份有限公司 | Detection equipment and method |
Family Cites Families (21)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
JPS57132044A (en) * | 1981-02-10 | 1982-08-16 | Hitachi Metals Ltd | Discriminating method of surface defect |
JPH0743322B2 (en) | 1985-07-19 | 1995-05-15 | 株式会社日立製作所 | Inspection method and device |
US4652757A (en) * | 1985-08-02 | 1987-03-24 | At&T Technologies, Inc. | Method and apparatus for optically determining defects in a semiconductor material |
US4893932A (en) * | 1986-05-02 | 1990-01-16 | Particle Measuring Systems, Inc. | Surface analysis system and method |
US4944799A (en) | 1987-09-10 | 1990-07-31 | Nkk Corporation | Method of producing stainless molten steel by smelting reduction |
JPH01137642A (en) | 1987-11-25 | 1989-05-30 | Toshiba Corp | Surface defect inspection device |
JPH0774788B2 (en) | 1988-03-28 | 1995-08-09 | 株式会社堀場製作所 | Foreign substance presence inspection device |
US4957368A (en) * | 1989-03-16 | 1990-09-18 | Photoacoustic Technology, Inc. | Apparatus and process for performing ellipsometric measurements of surfaces |
US5127726A (en) * | 1989-05-19 | 1992-07-07 | Eastman Kodak Company | Method and apparatus for low angle, high resolution surface inspection |
US5216485A (en) | 1991-09-04 | 1993-06-01 | International Business Machines Corporation | Advanced via inspection tool (avit) |
US5448364A (en) | 1993-03-22 | 1995-09-05 | Estek Corporation | Particle detection system with reflective line-to-spot collector |
JP2847458B2 (en) * | 1993-03-26 | 1999-01-20 | 三井金属鉱業株式会社 | Defect evaluation device |
JP3246811B2 (en) * | 1993-10-18 | 2002-01-15 | 菱電セミコンダクタシステムエンジニアリング株式会社 | Semiconductor wafer inspection equipment |
US5565979A (en) | 1994-11-04 | 1996-10-15 | Tencor Instruments | Surface scanning apparatus and method using crossed-cylinder optical elements |
JP3593161B2 (en) | 1994-11-15 | 2004-11-24 | 株式会社トプコン | Measuring device for foreign matter position on rotating body |
JPH0989794A (en) | 1995-09-25 | 1997-04-04 | Hitachi Ltd | Method and apparatus for inspecting external appearance and manufacture of semiconductor device |
US5818576A (en) | 1995-11-28 | 1998-10-06 | Hitachi Electronics Engineering Co., Ltd. | Extraneous substance inspection apparatus for patterned wafer |
JP3839533B2 (en) * | 1996-11-15 | 2006-11-01 | スプレイ デバイセズ テクノロジー シンドリアン ベルハッド | Nebulizer |
US6034776A (en) * | 1997-04-16 | 2000-03-07 | The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of Commerce | Microroughness-blind optical scattering instrument |
FR2779838B1 (en) * | 1998-06-15 | 2000-08-04 | Alsthom Cge Alcatel | OPTICAL COMPONENT WITH SEMICONDUCTOR AND AMPLIFIER AND WAVELENGTH CONVERTER COMPOSED BY THIS COMPONENT |
US6169601B1 (en) * | 1998-06-23 | 2001-01-02 | Ade Optical Systems | Method and apparatus for distinguishing particles from subsurface defects on a substrate using polarized light |
-
1999
- 1999-08-23 KR KR1019990034927A patent/KR100301067B1/en active IP Right Grant
-
2000
- 2000-06-01 US US09/584,671 patent/US6528333B1/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 2000-08-09 JP JP2000241210A patent/JP4059334B2/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
- 2000-08-11 GB GB0019869A patent/GB2353592B/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 2000-08-22 DE DE10041118A patent/DE10041118A1/en not_active Ceased
- 2000-08-23 CN CNB00124292XA patent/CN1144038C/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
-
2001
- 2001-05-25 US US09/864,398 patent/US6449037B2/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
Cited By (19)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US7972970B2 (en) | 2003-10-20 | 2011-07-05 | Novellus Systems, Inc. | Fabrication of semiconductor interconnect structure |
US8481432B2 (en) | 2003-10-20 | 2013-07-09 | Novellus Systems, Inc. | Fabrication of semiconductor interconnect structure |
US20070105377A1 (en) * | 2003-10-20 | 2007-05-10 | Novellus Systems, Inc. | Fabrication of semiconductor interconnect structure |
US9074286B2 (en) | 2003-10-20 | 2015-07-07 | Novellus Systems, Inc. | Wet etching methods for copper removal and planarization in semiconductor processing |
US20100015805A1 (en) * | 2003-10-20 | 2010-01-21 | Novellus Systems, Inc. | Wet Etching Methods for Copper Removal and Planarization in Semiconductor Processing |
US20100029088A1 (en) * | 2003-10-20 | 2010-02-04 | Novellus Systems, Inc. | Modulated metal removal using localized wet etching |
US8530359B2 (en) | 2003-10-20 | 2013-09-10 | Novellus Systems, Inc. | Modulated metal removal using localized wet etching |
US7338908B1 (en) * | 2003-10-20 | 2008-03-04 | Novellus Systems, Inc. | Method for fabrication of semiconductor interconnect structure with reduced capacitance, leakage current, and improved breakdown voltage |
US7531463B2 (en) * | 2003-10-20 | 2009-05-12 | Novellus Systems, Inc. | Fabrication of semiconductor interconnect structure |
US8470191B2 (en) | 2003-10-20 | 2013-06-25 | Novellus Systems, Inc. | Topography reduction and control by selective accelerator removal |
US8372757B2 (en) | 2003-10-20 | 2013-02-12 | Novellus Systems, Inc. | Wet etching methods for copper removal and planarization in semiconductor processing |
US9447505B2 (en) | 2005-10-05 | 2016-09-20 | Novellus Systems, Inc. | Wet etching methods for copper removal and planarization in semiconductor processing |
US8415261B1 (en) | 2005-10-13 | 2013-04-09 | Novellus Systems, Inc. | Capping before barrier-removal IC fabrication method |
US7811925B1 (en) | 2005-10-13 | 2010-10-12 | Novellus Systems, Inc. | Capping before barrier-removal IC fabrication method |
US7605082B1 (en) | 2005-10-13 | 2009-10-20 | Novellus Systems, Inc. | Capping before barrier-removal IC fabrication method |
US8043958B1 (en) | 2005-10-13 | 2011-10-25 | Novellus Systems, Inc. | Capping before barrier-removal IC fabrication method |
US20110056913A1 (en) * | 2009-09-02 | 2011-03-10 | Mayer Steven T | Reduced isotropic etchant material consumption and waste generation |
US8597461B2 (en) | 2009-09-02 | 2013-12-03 | Novellus Systems, Inc. | Reduced isotropic etchant material consumption and waste generation |
US9074287B2 (en) | 2009-09-02 | 2015-07-07 | Novellus Systems, Inc. | Reduced isotropic etchant material consumption and waste generation |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
JP2001110863A (en) | 2001-04-20 |
DE10041118A1 (en) | 2001-03-01 |
CN1285509A (en) | 2001-02-28 |
KR20010018816A (en) | 2001-03-15 |
CN1144038C (en) | 2004-03-31 |
KR100301067B1 (en) | 2001-11-01 |
GB0019869D0 (en) | 2000-09-27 |
GB2353592B (en) | 2004-02-25 |
JP4059334B2 (en) | 2008-03-12 |
US6449037B2 (en) | 2002-09-10 |
US6528333B1 (en) | 2003-03-04 |
GB2353592A (en) | 2001-02-28 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US6528333B1 (en) | Method of and device for detecting micro-scratches | |
US4342515A (en) | Method of inspecting the surface of an object and apparatus therefor | |
US7102744B2 (en) | Process and assembly for non-destructive surface inspections | |
US8314929B2 (en) | Method and its apparatus for inspecting defects | |
JP6461904B2 (en) | Defect detection using surface-enhanced electric fields | |
JP4797005B2 (en) | Surface inspection method and surface inspection apparatus | |
US7869025B2 (en) | Optical inspection method and optical inspection system | |
US8520208B1 (en) | Segmented polarizer for optimizing performance of a surface inspection system | |
US6608689B1 (en) | Combination thin-film stress and thickness measurement device | |
US5953115A (en) | Method and apparatus for imaging surface topography of a wafer | |
US6714295B2 (en) | Optical inspection method and apparatus having an enhanced height sensitivity region and roughness filtering | |
US6650408B2 (en) | Method for inspecting a polishing pad in a semiconductor manufacturing process, an apparatus for performing the method, and a polishing device adopting the apparatus | |
US6014218A (en) | Device and method for end-point monitoring used in the polishing of components, in particular semiconductor components | |
JP5219487B2 (en) | Defect inspection apparatus and defect inspection program | |
JP3432273B2 (en) | Foreign matter inspection device and foreign matter inspection method | |
JPH10214804A (en) | Device for monitoring flattening process for mechanical/ chemical polisher | |
JP4147675B2 (en) | Detection method, detection apparatus, and polishing apparatus | |
JP2006112871A (en) | Inspection method of semiconductor substrate, and its inspection device | |
WO2023197124A1 (en) | Apparatus for testing surface state of sample to be tested | |
US7355711B2 (en) | Method for detecting an end-point for polishing a material | |
JPH0141922B2 (en) | ||
Gómez-Rosas et al. | The dynamic angle-limited integrated scattering (DALIS) method for measuring scattering of light from optical surfaces with random roughness | |
JP3770604B2 (en) | Foreign matter inspection apparatus and DRAM manufacturing method | |
JPH0915134A (en) | Method and equipment for inspecting particle | |
JPH0688709A (en) | Bump-electrode inspecting apparatus |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
STCF | Information on status: patent grant |
Free format text: PATENTED CASE |
|
FEPP | Fee payment procedure |
Free format text: PAYOR NUMBER ASSIGNED (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: ASPN); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITY |
|
FPAY | Fee payment |
Year of fee payment: 4 |
|
FEPP | Fee payment procedure |
Free format text: PAYER NUMBER DE-ASSIGNED (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: RMPN); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITY Free format text: PAYOR NUMBER ASSIGNED (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: ASPN); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITY |
|
FPAY | Fee payment |
Year of fee payment: 8 |
|
FPAY | Fee payment |
Year of fee payment: 12 |