US20010041950A1 - Overhead system of inclined eccentric geosynchronous orbiting satellites - Google Patents
Overhead system of inclined eccentric geosynchronous orbiting satellites Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- US20010041950A1 US20010041950A1 US09/885,021 US88502101A US2001041950A1 US 20010041950 A1 US20010041950 A1 US 20010041950A1 US 88502101 A US88502101 A US 88502101A US 2001041950 A1 US2001041950 A1 US 2001041950A1
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- satellite
- orbit
- service area
- earth
- iego
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Granted
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04B—TRANSMISSION
- H04B7/00—Radio transmission systems, i.e. using radiation field
- H04B7/14—Relay systems
- H04B7/15—Active relay systems
- H04B7/185—Space-based or airborne stations; Stations for satellite systems
- H04B7/195—Non-synchronous stations
Definitions
- the present invention relates generally to an overhead system of inclined eccentric geosynchronous orbit satellite orbits and, more particularly, to a satellite system whose operation is concentrated overhead as viewed from within a service area.
- Satellites in geostationary orbits have been widely preferred for several decades because of the economic advantages afforded by such orbits.
- GSOs geostationary orbits
- These satellites are always “in view” at all locations within their service areas, so their utilization efficiency is effectively 100 percent.
- Antennas at Earth ground stations need be aimed at a GSO satellite only once; no tracking system is required.
- LEO's low Earth orbits
- MEO's medium Earth orbits
- higher frequencies for example, the Ka band (up to approximately 40 GHz).
- LEO's low Earth orbits
- MEO's medium Earth orbits
- a host of proposed LEO and MEO systems exemplify this direction.
- a drawback of LEO and MEO systems for users is the relative uncertainty of satellite position, and rapid motion, leading typically to the use of omnidirectional antennas having low gain, which limits data rate.
- HEO Highly elliptical orbits
- MEO Mobility Assisted Mobile Environment
- HEO's disadvantages include a shorter fraction of service to a given area (fractionally geosynchronous period causes multiple nodes over the earth) and require specific 63° inclination (to minimize fuel requirements due to low perigee).
- LEO, MEO, and HEO systems require more satellites for coverage at a specified elevation angle to a single service area than does the present invention.
- the present invention provides a satellite system that takes advantage of inclined eccentric geosynchronous orbits to provide relatively low cost satellite service particularly suitable for consumer markets.
- the present invention also provides a satellite system with continuous coverage of the service area using a synchronized set of two or more satellites.
- a synchronized system of inclined eccentric geosynchronous satellite orbits has a service area defined on a surface of the earth.
- the service area is defined with elevation angles greater than a predetermined minimum from the horizon, from anywhere within the service area to the satellite system.
- An IEGO satellite has an orbit with respect to the earth having an orbital sky track fixed in the sky when viewed from within said service area.
- the sky track has a ground track which corresponds thereto.
- An operating arc is defined by a subset of the orbital sky track over the service area. The satellites of the set operate successively on the operating arc portion of the sky track.
- An advantage is that the overhead system can provide continuous high elevation coverage, with handover to another satellite phased in the same track.
- Another advantage of the present invention is that it allows the use of conical-pattern upward-looking user antenna rather than a tracking antenna.
- FIG. 1 is a perspective view of an inclined elliptic geosynchronous orbit, an inclined geosynchronous orbit, and a geostationary (IEGO) orbit with respect to the earth. The latter two orbits are for reference only.
- FIG. 2 is a perspective view similar to that of FIG. 1 five hours later in time.
- FIG. 3 is a perspective view of an alternative embodiment according to the present invention in which two IEGO orbit planes are established so that a phased pair of satellites will follow each other in a common ground or sky track.
- FIG. 4 is an equirectangular projection map showing a typical ground track associated with the present invention.
- FIG. 5 is a upward looking view of an operating arc of the IEGO system of FIG. 4.
- FIG. 6 is a perspective view of a upward receiving cone with respect to an antenna in one application of the invention.
- FIG. 7 is a skyward plot of a two IEGO system having an eccentricity of 0.463 from five locations in the continental U.S.
- FIG. 8 is a variation of FIG. 7 having an eccentricity of 0.31.
- FIG. 9 is a skyward plot of a three IEGO system having an eccentricity of 0.505.
- FIG. 10 is a skyward plot of a three IEGO system having an eccentricity of 0.203.
- FIG. 11 is a skyward plot of a two IEGO system having an eccentricity of 0.24.
- FIG. 12 is a plot of elevatnion angle in degrees versus eccentricity comparing an IEGO system and a Molniya system.
- FIG. 13 is a directivity versus eccentricity plot comparing an IEGO system and a Molniya system.
- FIG. 14 is a plot of elevation angle in degrees versus eccentricity comparing an IEGO system and a Molniya system.
- FIG. 15 is a directivity versus eccentricity plot comparing an IEGO system and a Molniya system.
- the present invention is illustrated herein in terms of a satellite orbit system using various inclination angles, eccentricity values and other values. It should be understood that specific numerical values are introduced as examples and not as final design values.
- the essence of the invention is the establishment of inclined, preferably geosynchronous, satellite orbits with repeating ground tracks on the earth are whose sky tracks include operating arcs which are confined to a fixed one over the service area.
- inclined elliptic geosynchronous orbits (IEGO) satellites enable operation to provide high elevation angle service for a predetermined service region on a landmass with possible spectrum re-use for small service areas.
- Earth 10 is shown with an inclined eccentric geosynchronous orbit (IEGO) 12 that has an IEGO satellite 14 .
- IEGO orbit 12 is shown in contrast to an inclined geosynchronous orbit (IGO) 16 .
- IGO orbit 16 is an inclined circular orbit centered about the Earth 10 .
- IGO orbit 16 has an IGO satellite 18 in a first position, which is used for reference.
- a geostationary (GSO) orbit 20 is also shown for contrast and has a GSO satellite 22 .
- GSO geostationary
- FIGS. 1 and 2 illustrate some general differences between a GSO, an IGO and an IEGO orbit.
- GSO orbit 20 has a radius R.
- GSO orbit 20 is defined on the equatorial plane of Earth 10 .
- GSO satellite 22 maintains a substantially constant position over the Earth. As seen from a point on the Earth, the elevation angle of the satellite is constant.
- IGO orbit 16 also has a radius R that is the same as that of GSO orbit 20 .
- IGO orbit 16 is disposed on a plane that has an inclination angle 24 with respect to the equatorial plane having GSO orbit 20 .
- the plane defined by IGO orbit 16 and GSO orbit 20 intersect at a line of nodes 26 that extends through the center of Earth 10 .
- IGO satellite 18 and GSO satellite 22 take one sidereal day (23 hours, 56 minutes) to complete an orbit.
- the elevation angle of an IGO orbit with respect to a point on the Earth depends on the position of IGO satellite 18 in its IGO orbit 16 .
- IEGO orbit 12 has an apogee 28 being set at the northernmost point of the orbit when viewed with respect to the Earth and an perigee 30 being the southernmost point of the orbit when viewed with respect to the Earth.
- IEGO in elliptical orbit 12 has a focus that is shifted from that of IGO orbit 16 so that apogee 28 is shifted in the direction of the northern hemisphere. Consequently, perigee 30 is shifted toward the southern hemisphere.
- the major diameter of IEGO orbit 12 is 2R as in the case of an IGO orbit 16 .
- IEGO orbit 12 is, however, shifted with respect to the center of IGO orbit 16 by an eccentricity factor e.
- e eccentricity factor
- the distance of the apogee 28 from line of nodes 26 is given by the formula (1+e)R.
- the distance of perigee 30 from the line of nodes 26 is given by the formula (1 ⁇ e)R.
- a ground track 32 on the surface of Earth 10 may be developed from IEGO satellite 14 .
- Ground tracks are imaginary lines representing the loci of subsatellite points that are repeatedly traced on the surface of the Earth by lines extending from the center of the Earth to orbiting satellites.
- IEGO ground tracks are located at specified longitudes and retrace repeatedly each sidereal day (23 hr. 56 min.).
- a second IEGO orbit 12 ′ is shown having an IEGO satellite 14 ′.
- IEGO orbit 12 ′ also has an inclination angle 24 ′.
- the inclination angle 24 ′ and phasing are chosen so that the satellite placed in IEGO orbit 12 ′ substantially traces the same ground track 32 as the satellite in IEGO orbit 12 .
- the IEGO satellites 14 , 14 ′ are positioned so that as one satellite is leaving a service area, the other satellite is entering the service area. In this manner, continuous coverage may be provided to a particular service area.
- a synchronized overhead IEGO system is generally indicated by reference numeral 34 .
- an equirectangular-projection map 36 shows North America and a substantial portion of South America.
- An example ground track 32 is shown that is projected from an IEGO orbit. The inclination of the ground track is 63.45° and has an eccentricity value e equal to 0.240 and is centered symmetrically on 96° west longitude (ascending at 69.0° west) and has an argument of perigee of 270°.
- Earth stations 42 will again communicate with satellite B rising in the east.
- the distance between eastern handover point 38 and western handover point 40 is defined as the operating arc 44 .
- the operating arc 44 is the portion of the ground track or a portion of the sky track (which remains in a cone overhead), when viewed from a point on the ground, over which the satellites operate.
- FIG. 5 a skyward looking plot of the orbital path as seen from the center of the service area as shown in FIG. 4 is illustrated. On this plot, 0° represents the horizon while 90° represents the zenith over a particular point on the landmass. Handover points 38 , 40 and operating arc 44 are also shown in skyward plot 46 . A plot of the geostationary belt 48 is illustrated to contrast the inclined eccentric geosynchronous orbit.
- a ground based user unit such as a mobile satellite receiving antenna 50 is positioned on an automobile 52 .
- a generally planar antenna 50 may be provided to receive signals from IEGO satellite 14 overhead.
- Cone 54 is directed in an upward direction toward the zenith. Because the elevation angle may be controlled, a relatively narrow cone 54 having a cone angle 55 may be generated by antenna 50 in an upward direction. This configuration provides higher gain than an omnidirectional antenna.
- the high elevation angles 51 from the horizon 53 of the system are more amenable to urban operation and being less affected by multi-path effects and atmospheric losses. No steering is required if an antenna providing an upward cone is provided that receives satellite signals throughout the service area.
- a skyward plot 58 having an operating arc at about 45° or more in elevation angle above the horizon at (0° elevation angle) from each of five cities within the continental United States service area.
- the cities were chosen to provide a representative view from essentially four corners of the continental United States and the center of the United States.
- the geostationary belt as seen from Miami and Seattle.
- Orbital parameters have been chosen to extend to maximize the minimum elevation angle for plots 62 a for all the cities within the service area.
- Plots 62 a of FIG. 7 use two IEGO satellites with orbital eccentricity of 0.43 and an inclination angle of 63.45° resulting in a minimum elevation angle of 46.9. These plots are subsets of points on the operating arc portion 62 of the orbital track within the service area.
- Plots 62 a are shown in contrast to GSO belts 63 as viewed from Miami and Seattle.
- plots 62 b similar to that of FIG. 7 are shown having an eccentricity of 0.31, an inclination angle of 50° for a two-IEGO satellite system resulting in a minimum elevation angle of 39.1°.
- plots 62 c having eccentricity of 0.505 and an inclination angle of 63.45° are illustrated for a three-IEGO satellite system resulting in a minimum elevation angle of 46.9°.
- plots 62 d having an eccentricity of 0.203 and an inclination angle of 50° are illustrated for a three-IEGO satellite system resulting in a minimum elevation angle of 59.2°.
- plots 62 e having an inclination angle of 63.45° and an eccentricity of 0.24 are illustrated for a two-IEGO system resulting in a minimum elevation angle of 45.1°.
- the shapes of the operating arc may be substantially changed to center the operating arc and maximize the minimum elevation angle within the service area.
- an optimum eccentricity may differ from that of the larger service area.
- an optimum eccentricity may be between 0.1 and 0.5.
- FIG. 12 a plot of minimum elevation angle in degrees versus eccentricity for an inclination of 63.45° is shown resulting in a minimum elevation angle of 63.45°.
- the maximum of the minimum elevation angles occur as the eccentricity is about 0.3 to 0.5 for IEGOs at this inclination.
- FIG. 13 the associated plot of geometric directivity of the receiving antenna versus eccentricity is plotted for a three IEGO system and a two IEGO system. As is shown, the directivity is maximized for eccentricity of about 0.3 to 0.5.
- the minimum elevation angle versus eccentricity plot is shown for an inclination of 50°. In this case, near-maximum of the minimum elevation angle occurs for eccentricity of about 0.2.
- FIG. 15 a plot corresponding to that of FIG. 14 is shown for directivity in decibels versus eccentricity.
- the directivity is maximized for eccentricity of about 0.2 to 0.3 for two IEGO and three IEGO systems.
- a service area In operation, for a particular landmass, a service area must be defined on the surface of the Earth.
- a service area is defined as a region (such as the continental U.S. or smaller such as a city) which the satellite beams toward, with a predetermined minimum elevation angle above the horizon of any point in the service area.
- a satellite pair or a plurality of satellites sharing the same ground track are launched above the surface of the earth in an inclined eccentric geosynchronous orbit.
- the region of operation of each of the satellites within the orbit is the operating arc which is overhead of that service area on the Earth.
- a loci of points is defined on the orbital track which define the service area and the operating arc above the service area.
- Handover points are defined as the points where operation is changed from one satellite to another satellite.
- Orbital parameters are chosen to realize certain ground track shapes. Consideration is given to specified constraints on the service region, service area coverage, and coverage time.
Abstract
A system of inclined geosynchronous satellite orbits has a service area defined on a surface of the earth. The service area has elevation angles greater than a predetermined minimum elevation angle from the horizon. A satellite has an orbit with respect to the earth having a sky track when viewed from within said service area. An operating arc is defined by a subset of points on the sky track within the service area. The satellites operate consecutively on the operating arc.
Description
- This application is a continuation of application Ser. No. 09/235,112, filed Jan. 21, 1999 (CPA pending).
- The present invention relates generally to an overhead system of inclined eccentric geosynchronous orbit satellite orbits and, more particularly, to a satellite system whose operation is concentrated overhead as viewed from within a service area.
- Satellites in geostationary orbits (GSOs) have been widely preferred for several decades because of the economic advantages afforded by such orbits. In a geostationary orbit, a satellite traveling above the Earth's equator, in the same direction as that in which the Earth is rotating, and at the same angular velocity, appears stationary relative to a point on the Earth. These satellites are always “in view” at all locations within their service areas, so their utilization efficiency is effectively 100 percent. Antennas at Earth ground stations need be aimed at a GSO satellite only once; no tracking system is required.
- Coordination between GSO's and with terrestrial services is facilitated by governmental allocation of designated “slots” angularly spaced according to service type. Given the desirability of geostationary satellite orbits and the fact that there are only a finite number of available “slots” in the geostationary “belt,” the latter capacity has been essentially saturated with satellites operating in desirable frequency bands up through the Ku-band (up to 18 GHz). As a result, the government has been auctioning the increasingly scarce remaining slots.
- This has encouraged the development of complex and expensive new systems including those using low Earth orbits (LEO's), medium Earth orbits (MEO's), and/or higher frequencies, for example, the Ka band (up to approximately 40 GHz). Growth to higher frequencies is limited by problems of technology and propagation, and expansion in satellite applications requires exploitation of the spatial dimension (i.e., above and below the GSO belt). A host of proposed LEO and MEO systems exemplify this direction. A drawback of LEO and MEO systems for users is the relative uncertainty of satellite position, and rapid motion, leading typically to the use of omnidirectional antennas having low gain, which limits data rate.
- Highly elliptical orbits (HEO) such as the 12-hour “Molniya” long used by Russia, and the European Space Agency's 8-hour “Archimedes” have been used. HEO's disadvantages include a shorter fraction of service to a given area (fractionally geosynchronous period causes multiple nodes over the earth) and require specific 63° inclination (to minimize fuel requirements due to low perigee). LEO, MEO, and HEO systems require more satellites for coverage at a specified elevation angle to a single service area than does the present invention.
- Another apparent drawback to the use of all inclined orbits is that of relative movement with respect to the ground. For wide bandwidths, two-dimensional tracking ground station antennas would be required. Tracking antennas are relatively expensive and thus are not considered for consumer applications.
- There has been no known prior effort to exploit overhead systems of inclined eccentric geosynchronous orbits (IEGOs) in a systematic manner, even though the unused domain of inclined eccentric geosynchronous orbits offers great potential for the coordinatable growth of satellite service.
- While the various prior systems function relatively satisfactorily and efficiently, none discloses the advantages of the overhead system of inclined, eccentric geosynchronous satellite orbits in accordance with the present invention as is hereinafter more fully described.
- The present invention provides a satellite system that takes advantage of inclined eccentric geosynchronous orbits to provide relatively low cost satellite service particularly suitable for consumer markets.
- The present invention also provides a satellite system with continuous coverage of the service area using a synchronized set of two or more satellites.
- In one aspect of the invention, a synchronized system of inclined eccentric geosynchronous satellite orbits (IEGO) has a service area defined on a surface of the earth. The service area is defined with elevation angles greater than a predetermined minimum from the horizon, from anywhere within the service area to the satellite system. An IEGO satellite has an orbit with respect to the earth having an orbital sky track fixed in the sky when viewed from within said service area. Of course, the sky track has a ground track which corresponds thereto. An operating arc is defined by a subset of the orbital sky track over the service area. The satellites of the set operate successively on the operating arc portion of the sky track.
- An advantage is that the overhead system can provide continuous high elevation coverage, with handover to another satellite phased in the same track. Another advantage of the present invention is that it allows the use of conical-pattern upward-looking user antenna rather than a tracking antenna.
- The objects, advantages and features of the present invention are readily apparent from the following detailed description of the best mode for carrying out the invention when taken in connection with the accompanying drawings and appended claims.
- A more complete appreciation of the invention and many of the attendant advantages and features thereof may be readily obtained by reference to the following detailed description when considered with the accompanying drawings in which like reference characters indicate corresponding parts in all the views, wherein:
- FIG. 1 is a perspective view of an inclined elliptic geosynchronous orbit, an inclined geosynchronous orbit, and a geostationary (IEGO) orbit with respect to the earth. The latter two orbits are for reference only.
- FIG. 2 is a perspective view similar to that of FIG. 1 five hours later in time.
- FIG. 3 is a perspective view of an alternative embodiment according to the present invention in which two IEGO orbit planes are established so that a phased pair of satellites will follow each other in a common ground or sky track.
- FIG. 4 is an equirectangular projection map showing a typical ground track associated with the present invention.
- FIG. 5 is a upward looking view of an operating arc of the IEGO system of FIG. 4.
- FIG. 6 is a perspective view of a upward receiving cone with respect to an antenna in one application of the invention.
- FIG. 7 is a skyward plot of a two IEGO system having an eccentricity of 0.463 from five locations in the continental U.S.
- FIG. 8 is a variation of FIG. 7 having an eccentricity of 0.31.
- FIG. 9 is a skyward plot of a three IEGO system having an eccentricity of 0.505.
- FIG. 10 is a skyward plot of a three IEGO system having an eccentricity of 0.203.
- FIG. 11 is a skyward plot of a two IEGO system having an eccentricity of 0.24.
- FIG. 12 is a plot of elevatnion angle in degrees versus eccentricity comparing an IEGO system and a Molniya system.
- FIG. 13 is a directivity versus eccentricity plot comparing an IEGO system and a Molniya system.
- FIG. 14 is a plot of elevation angle in degrees versus eccentricity comparing an IEGO system and a Molniya system.
- FIG. 15 is a directivity versus eccentricity plot comparing an IEGO system and a Molniya system.
- The present invention is illustrated herein in terms of a satellite orbit system using various inclination angles, eccentricity values and other values. It should be understood that specific numerical values are introduced as examples and not as final design values.
- The essence of the invention is the establishment of inclined, preferably geosynchronous, satellite orbits with repeating ground tracks on the earth are whose sky tracks include operating arcs which are confined to a fixed one over the service area.
- In the present invention, (24 hour), inclined elliptic geosynchronous orbits (IEGO) satellites enable operation to provide high elevation angle service for a predetermined service region on a landmass with possible spectrum re-use for small service areas.
- Referring now to FIG. 1, Earth10 is shown with an inclined eccentric geosynchronous orbit (IEGO) 12 that has an IEGO
satellite 14. IEGOorbit 12 is shown in contrast to an inclined geosynchronous orbit (IGO) 16. IGOorbit 16 is an inclined circular orbit centered about the Earth 10. IGOorbit 16 has an IGOsatellite 18 in a first position, which is used for reference. A geostationary (GSO)orbit 20 is also shown for contrast and has a GSOsatellite 22. Each of thesatellites respective orbits - FIGS. 1 and 2 illustrate some general differences between a GSO, an IGO and an IEGO orbit. In this example,
GSO orbit 20 has a radiusR. GSO orbit 20 is defined on the equatorial plane ofEarth 10. AsEarth 10 rotates daily,GSO satellite 22 maintains a substantially constant position over the Earth. As seen from a point on the Earth, the elevation angle of the satellite is constant. -
IGO orbit 16 also has a radius R that is the same as that ofGSO orbit 20.IGO orbit 16 is disposed on a plane that has aninclination angle 24 with respect to the equatorial plane havingGSO orbit 20. The plane defined byIGO orbit 16 andGSO orbit 20 intersect at a line ofnodes 26 that extends through the center ofEarth 10.IGO satellite 18 andGSO satellite 22 take one sidereal day (23 hours, 56 minutes) to complete an orbit. The elevation angle of an IGO orbit with respect to a point on the Earth depends on the position ofIGO satellite 18 in itsIGO orbit 16. -
IEGO orbit 12 has anapogee 28 being set at the northernmost point of the orbit when viewed with respect to the Earth and an perigee 30 being the southernmost point of the orbit when viewed with respect to the Earth. IEGO inelliptical orbit 12 has a focus that is shifted from that ofIGO orbit 16 so thatapogee 28 is shifted in the direction of the northern hemisphere. Consequently, perigee 30 is shifted toward the southern hemisphere. Thus, the altitude ofapogee 28 above the surface of the Earth is increased while the elevation of the perigee 30 is decreased. The major diameter ofIEGO orbit 12 is 2R as in the case of anIGO orbit 16.IEGO orbit 12 is, however, shifted with respect to the center ofIGO orbit 16 by an eccentricity factor e. Thus, the distance of theapogee 28 from line ofnodes 26 is given by the formula (1+e)R. The distance of perigee 30 from the line ofnodes 26 is given by the formula (1−e)R. - A
ground track 32 on the surface ofEarth 10 may be developed fromIEGO satellite 14. Ground tracks are imaginary lines representing the loci of subsatellite points that are repeatedly traced on the surface of the Earth by lines extending from the center of the Earth to orbiting satellites. IEGO ground tracks are located at specified longitudes and retrace repeatedly each sidereal day (23 hr. 56 min.). - The position of
satellites IGO satellite 18 andIEGO satellite 14 also changes. - Referring now to FIG. 3, a
second IEGO orbit 12′ is shown having anIEGO satellite 14′.IEGO orbit 12′ also has aninclination angle 24′. Theinclination angle 24′ and phasing are chosen so that the satellite placed inIEGO orbit 12′ substantially traces thesame ground track 32 as the satellite inIEGO orbit 12. TheIEGO satellites - Although not illustrated, the above example may be extended to three or more planes of IEGO orbits all synchronized so that continuous coverage may be provided to a service area within corresponding similar cones. More satellites may be required if a larger service area or a higher elevation angle within the service area is desired. By providing service at high elevation angles, applications in fixed satellite service, broadcast satellite service, or mobile satellite service may be more efficiently realized. Thus, a synchronized overhead IEGO system is generally indicated by
reference numeral 34. - Referring now to FIG. 4, an equirectangular-
projection map 36 shows North America and a substantial portion of South America. Anexample ground track 32 is shown that is projected from an IEGO orbit. The inclination of the ground track is 63.45° and has an eccentricity value e equal to 0.240 and is centered symmetrically on 96° west longitude (ascending at 69.0° west) and has an argument of perigee of 270°. Two similar satellites, A & B, are shown sharingground track 32 and are separated by a half a period. Active satellite A is about to start operation as it rises through a eastern handover point 38 (latitude, longitude=24.0N, 83.0W). Satellite B is concurrently setting through an western handover point 40 (latitude, longitude=24.0N, 109.0W). At the time when satellite A will set in the west, Earth stations 42 will again communicate with satellite B rising in the east. The distance betweeneastern handover point 38 andwestern handover point 40 is defined as the operatingarc 44. The operatingarc 44 is the portion of the ground track or a portion of the sky track (which remains in a cone overhead), when viewed from a point on the ground, over which the satellites operate. - Referring now to FIG. 5, a skyward looking plot of the orbital path as seen from the center of the service area as shown in FIG. 4 is illustrated. On this plot, 0° represents the horizon while 90° represents the zenith over a particular point on the landmass. Handover points38, 40 and operating
arc 44 are also shown in skywardplot 46. A plot of thegeostationary belt 48 is illustrated to contrast the inclined eccentric geosynchronous orbit. - Referring now to FIG. 6, a ground based user unit such as a mobile
satellite receiving antenna 50 is positioned on anautomobile 52. Thus, one advantage of the present invention is illustrated. That is, the present invention is suitable for mobile applications such as an automobile because a generallyplanar antenna 50 may be provided to receive signals fromIEGO satellite 14 overhead.Cone 54 is directed in an upward direction toward the zenith. Because the elevation angle may be controlled, a relativelynarrow cone 54 having acone angle 55 may be generated byantenna 50 in an upward direction. This configuration provides higher gain than an omnidirectional antenna. The high elevation angles 51 from thehorizon 53 of the system are more amenable to urban operation and being less affected by multi-path effects and atmospheric losses. No steering is required if an antenna providing an upward cone is provided that receives satellite signals throughout the service area. - Referring now to FIG. 7, a skyward
plot 58 is shown having an operating arc at about 45° or more in elevation angle above the horizon at (0° elevation angle) from each of five cities within the continental United States service area. The cities were chosen to provide a representative view from essentially four corners of the continental United States and the center of the United States. Also plotted is the geostationary belt as seen from Miami and Seattle. Orbital parameters have been chosen to extend to maximize the minimum elevation angle forplots 62 a for all the cities within the service area.Plots 62 a of FIG. 7 use two IEGO satellites with orbital eccentricity of 0.43 and an inclination angle of 63.45° resulting in a minimum elevation angle of 46.9. These plots are subsets of points on the operating arc portion 62 of the orbital track within the service area.Plots 62 a are shown in contrast to GSO belts 63 as viewed from Miami and Seattle. - Referring now to FIG. 8, plots62 b similar to that of FIG. 7 are shown having an eccentricity of 0.31, an inclination angle of 50° for a two-IEGO satellite system resulting in a minimum elevation angle of 39.1°.
- Referring now to FIG. 9, plots62 c having eccentricity of 0.505 and an inclination angle of 63.45° are illustrated for a three-IEGO satellite system resulting in a minimum elevation angle of 46.9°.
- Referring now to FIG. 10, plots62 d having an eccentricity of 0.203 and an inclination angle of 50° are illustrated for a three-IEGO satellite system resulting in a minimum elevation angle of 59.2°.
- Referring now to FIG. 11, plots62 e having an inclination angle of 63.45° and an eccentricity of 0.24 are illustrated for a two-IEGO system resulting in a minimum elevation angle of 45.1°.
- Thus, it can be observed that by changing the eccentricity values and the angle of inclination values, the shapes of the operating arc may be substantially changed to center the operating arc and maximize the minimum elevation angle within the service area.
- Smaller eccentricity is preferred for the advantages of the more circular orbit, with small impact on the minimum elevation angle. In the case of the smaller service area such as a single state or city, the optimum eccentricity may differ from that of the larger service area. Thus, an optimum eccentricity may be between 0.1 and 0.5.
- Referring now to FIG. 12, a plot of minimum elevation angle in degrees versus eccentricity for an inclination of 63.45° is shown resulting in a minimum elevation angle of 63.45°. Thus, the maximum of the minimum elevation angles occur as the eccentricity is about 0.3 to 0.5 for IEGOs at this inclination.
- Referring now to FIG. 13, the associated plot of geometric directivity of the receiving antenna versus eccentricity is plotted for a three IEGO system and a two IEGO system. As is shown, the directivity is maximized for eccentricity of about 0.3 to 0.5.
- Referring now to FIG. 14, the minimum elevation angle versus eccentricity plot is shown for an inclination of 50°. In this case, near-maximum of the minimum elevation angle occurs for eccentricity of about 0.2.
- Referring now to FIG. 15, a plot corresponding to that of FIG. 14 is shown for directivity in decibels versus eccentricity. The directivity is maximized for eccentricity of about 0.2 to 0.3 for two IEGO and three IEGO systems.
- In FIGS. 12 through 15, the curve of minimum elevation angle for IEGO orbits is broad with maxima at low eccentricity. In contrast, such curves for HEOs including Molniyas rise with eccentricity, and peak at high eccentricity above 0.6. Consequently, the combination of elevation angles and number of satellites is more favorable for the more circular IEGO orbit of this invention than for HEO systems previously employed.
- In operation, for a particular landmass, a service area must be defined on the surface of the Earth. A service area is defined as a region (such as the continental U.S. or smaller such as a city) which the satellite beams toward, with a predetermined minimum elevation angle above the horizon of any point in the service area. A satellite pair or a plurality of satellites sharing the same ground track are launched above the surface of the earth in an inclined eccentric geosynchronous orbit. The region of operation of each of the satellites within the orbit is the operating arc which is overhead of that service area on the Earth. Thus, as the satellites traverse their orbits, a loci of points is defined on the orbital track which define the service area and the operating arc above the service area. It is preferred that as one satellite is leaving the service area, a second satellite is entering the service area. Handover points are defined as the points where operation is changed from one satellite to another satellite. Thus, by defining the service area as a region having a relatively high elevation angle, better service coverage may be provided by a less expensive antenna not requiring adjustments by the user.
- Orbital parameters are chosen to realize certain ground track shapes. Consideration is given to specified constraints on the service region, service area coverage, and coverage time.
- While the invention has been described in detail, those familiar with the art to which this invention relates will recognize various alternative designs and embodiments for practicing the invention as defined by the following claims.
Claims (7)
1. A system of inclined geosynchronous satellite orbits above a landmass comprising:
a service area on a surface of the earth having a predetermined minimum elevation angle from the horizon;
a satellite having an orbit with respect to the earth having sky track when viewed from within said service area; and
an operating arc defined by a subset of points on said sky track over said service area, said satellite operating on said operating arc.
2. A system as recited in wherein said orbit has a predetermined inclination with respect to an equatorial plane of the earth.
claim 1
3. A system as recited in wherein said orbit has a predetermined eccentricity.
claim 1
4. A system as recited in wherein said orbit has an eccentricity factor between about 0.1 and 0.5.
claim 3
5. A system as recited in wherein said minimum elevation angle is greater than thirty degrees.
claim 1
6. A system as recited in wherein said minimum elevation angle is greater than sixty degrees.
claim 1
7. A system as recited in wherein in said orbital track having an apogee and a perigee, said apogee is over said service area.
claim 1
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US09/885,021 US6389336B2 (en) | 1999-01-21 | 2001-06-20 | Overhead system of inclined eccentric geosynchronous orbiting satellites |
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US09/235,112 US6327523B2 (en) | 1999-01-21 | 1999-01-21 | Overhead system of inclined eccentric geosynchronous orbitting satellites |
US09/885,021 US6389336B2 (en) | 1999-01-21 | 2001-06-20 | Overhead system of inclined eccentric geosynchronous orbiting satellites |
Related Parent Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US09/235,112 Continuation US6327523B2 (en) | 1999-01-21 | 1999-01-21 | Overhead system of inclined eccentric geosynchronous orbitting satellites |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
US20010041950A1 true US20010041950A1 (en) | 2001-11-15 |
US6389336B2 US6389336B2 (en) | 2002-05-14 |
Family
ID=22884148
Family Applications (2)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US09/235,112 Expired - Fee Related US6327523B2 (en) | 1999-01-21 | 1999-01-21 | Overhead system of inclined eccentric geosynchronous orbitting satellites |
US09/885,021 Expired - Fee Related US6389336B2 (en) | 1999-01-21 | 2001-06-20 | Overhead system of inclined eccentric geosynchronous orbiting satellites |
Family Applications Before (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US09/235,112 Expired - Fee Related US6327523B2 (en) | 1999-01-21 | 1999-01-21 | Overhead system of inclined eccentric geosynchronous orbitting satellites |
Country Status (4)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (2) | US6327523B2 (en) |
EP (1) | EP1022867B1 (en) |
JP (1) | JP2000224090A (en) |
DE (1) | DE60034163T2 (en) |
Cited By (5)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20020177403A1 (en) * | 2001-02-09 | 2002-11-28 | Laprade James Nicholas | High availability broadband communications satellite system using satellite constellations in elliptical orbits inclined to the equatorial plane |
US20030228867A1 (en) * | 2002-01-29 | 2003-12-11 | David Castiel | Virtually geostationary satellite array with optimized parameters |
US6695260B2 (en) * | 2000-02-03 | 2004-02-24 | Virtual Geosatellite Llc | Virtually geostationary satellite array |
US8360366B1 (en) * | 2009-03-12 | 2013-01-29 | Hsin-Hsien Chung | Diamond constellation of non-geostationary satellites for broadband multimedia communications |
US10329034B2 (en) | 2016-02-26 | 2019-06-25 | Space Systems/Loral, Llc | Efficient orbital storage and deployment for spacecraft in inclined geosynchronous orbit |
Families Citing this family (41)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
JP3477115B2 (en) * | 1999-03-16 | 2003-12-10 | 株式会社日立製作所 | Method for broadcasting via satellite, satellite broadcasting system, satellite broadcasting base station, and satellite broadcasting terminal |
US6257526B1 (en) | 1998-11-09 | 2001-07-10 | Hughes Electronics Corporation | Satellite system and method of deploying same |
US6678520B1 (en) | 1999-01-07 | 2004-01-13 | Hughes Electronics Corporation | Method and apparatus for providing wideband services using medium and low earth orbit satellites |
US6990314B1 (en) | 1999-03-18 | 2006-01-24 | The Directv Group, Inc. | Multi-node point-to-point satellite communication system employing multiple geo satellites |
JP2001067594A (en) * | 1999-08-31 | 2001-03-16 | Hitachi Ltd | Broadcast method, broadcast device, traffic information compiling device and traffic information display system |
US6954613B1 (en) * | 1999-09-10 | 2005-10-11 | Virtual Geosatellite Holdings, Inc. | Fixed satellite constellation system employing non-geostationary satellites in sub-geosynchronous elliptical orbits with common ground tracks |
US6511020B2 (en) * | 2000-01-07 | 2003-01-28 | The Boeing Company | Method for limiting interference between satellite communications systems |
US6725012B1 (en) * | 2000-02-01 | 2004-04-20 | The Aerospace Corporation | Method for deploying an orbiting sparse array antenna |
US7184761B1 (en) * | 2000-03-27 | 2007-02-27 | The Directv Group, Inc. | Satellite communications system |
US7200360B1 (en) | 2000-06-15 | 2007-04-03 | The Directv Group, Inc. | Communication system as a secondary platform with frequency reuse |
US6725013B1 (en) | 2000-06-15 | 2004-04-20 | Hughes Electronics Corporation | Communication system having frequency reuse in non-blocking manner |
AU2000279094A1 (en) * | 2000-09-28 | 2002-04-08 | Ses Astra S.A. | Satellite communications system |
US7369809B1 (en) * | 2000-10-30 | 2008-05-06 | The Directv Group, Inc. | System and method for continuous broadcast service from non-geostationary orbits |
US6714521B2 (en) * | 2000-12-29 | 2004-03-30 | Space Resources International Ltd. | System and method for implementing a constellation of non-geostationary satellites that provides simplified satellite tracking |
US6695262B2 (en) * | 2001-12-07 | 2004-02-24 | The Boeing Company | Spacecraft methods and structures for enhanced service-attitude accuracy |
US6732977B1 (en) | 2002-02-11 | 2004-05-11 | Lockheed Martin Corporation | System for on-orbit correction of spacecraft payload pointing errors |
US6695263B1 (en) | 2002-02-12 | 2004-02-24 | Lockheed Martin Corporation | System for geosynchronous spacecraft rapid earth reacquisition |
US7051980B2 (en) * | 2002-02-26 | 2006-05-30 | Lockheed Martin Corporation | Efficient orbit sparing system for space vehicle constellations |
US6702234B1 (en) | 2002-03-29 | 2004-03-09 | Lockheed Martin Corporation | Fault tolerant attitude control system for zero momentum spacecraft |
US6600976B1 (en) * | 2002-03-29 | 2003-07-29 | Lockheed Martin Corporation | Gyroless control system for zero-momentum three-axis stabilized spacecraft |
US6616104B1 (en) * | 2002-06-24 | 2003-09-09 | Lockheed Martin Corporation | Spacecraft configuration and attitude steering method for highly inclined orbit (HIO) communications |
US20040211864A1 (en) * | 2003-04-25 | 2004-10-28 | Less Gregory P. | Efficient communications utilizing highly inclined, highly elliptic orbits |
US7835826B1 (en) | 2005-12-13 | 2010-11-16 | Lockheed Martin Corporation | Attitude determination system for yaw-steering spacecraft |
US8923850B2 (en) | 2006-04-13 | 2014-12-30 | Atc Technologies, Llc | Systems and methods for controlling base station sectors to reduce potential interference with low elevation satellites |
US8090312B2 (en) * | 2006-10-03 | 2012-01-03 | Raytheon Company | System and method for observing a satellite using a satellite in retrograde orbit |
US7840180B2 (en) * | 2006-12-22 | 2010-11-23 | The Boeing Company | Molniya orbit satellite systems, apparatus, and methods |
US8016240B2 (en) * | 2007-03-29 | 2011-09-13 | The Boeing Company | Satellites and satellite fleet implementation methods and apparatus |
US9045239B2 (en) * | 2009-01-14 | 2015-06-02 | Space Systems/Loral, Llc | Spacecraft payload orientation steering |
US8240611B2 (en) * | 2009-08-26 | 2012-08-14 | Raytheon Company | Retro-geo spinning satellite utilizing time delay integration (TDI) for geosynchronous surveillance |
CN101916114B (en) * | 2010-04-14 | 2011-12-07 | 清华大学 | Design method of service track providing ontrack service for satellite constellations |
CA2716174C (en) * | 2010-10-01 | 2019-11-26 | Telesat Canada | Satellite system |
KR20120071238A (en) * | 2010-12-22 | 2012-07-02 | 한국전자통신연구원 | System for global earth navigation using inclined geosynchronous orbit satellite |
US8768622B2 (en) * | 2012-09-14 | 2014-07-01 | The United States Of America, As Represented By The Secretary Of The Navy | System and method for maneuver plan for satellites flying in proximity using apocentral coordinate system |
RU2562902C1 (en) * | 2014-02-06 | 2015-09-10 | Открытое акционерное общество "Ракетно-космическая корпорация "Энергия" имени С.П. Королева" | Method to control motion of docked space objects |
US10135520B2 (en) * | 2015-03-13 | 2018-11-20 | Peter Lemme | System and method for communicating via a satellite in an inclined geosynchronous orbit |
US9919813B2 (en) | 2015-04-15 | 2018-03-20 | The United States Of America, As Represented By The Secretary Of The Navy | Control system and method for a plane change for satellite operations |
AU2016302616B2 (en) * | 2015-07-31 | 2020-06-25 | Viasat, Inc. | Flexible capacity satellite constellation |
US10533856B2 (en) | 2017-04-05 | 2020-01-14 | Novatel Inc. | Navigation system utilizing yaw rate constraint during inertial dead reckoning |
US10361773B2 (en) | 2017-04-24 | 2019-07-23 | Blue Digs LLC | Satellite constellation having multiple orbital inclinations |
US10374713B1 (en) * | 2017-06-21 | 2019-08-06 | Blue Digs LLC | Satellite system with networked gateways |
US11838098B2 (en) | 2022-01-14 | 2023-12-05 | Rovial SAS | Satellite communication system with high-ground elevation angle |
Family Cites Families (41)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US3497807A (en) | 1966-08-31 | 1970-02-24 | Us Navy | Multipurpose satellite system |
US3836969A (en) * | 1971-10-26 | 1974-09-17 | Rca Corp | Geo-synchronous satellites in quasi-equatorial orbits |
FR2453780A1 (en) * | 1979-04-10 | 1980-11-07 | Aerospatiale | TERRESTRIAL OBSERVATION SYSTEM BY SATELLITES |
DE3145207A1 (en) * | 1981-02-28 | 1982-09-23 | Siemens AG, 1000 Berlin und 8000 München | TELECOMMUNICATION SATELLITE SYSTEM WITH GEOSTATIONAL POSITION LOOPS |
GB8300747D0 (en) | 1983-01-12 | 1983-02-16 | British Aerospace | Co-operative satellites |
US4809935A (en) | 1985-07-31 | 1989-03-07 | Analytic Services, Inc. | Satellite continuous coverage constellations |
CA1334292C (en) * | 1986-10-06 | 1995-02-07 | Andrew E. Turner | Apogee at constant time-of-day equatorial (ace) orbit |
GB8801008D0 (en) | 1988-01-18 | 1988-02-17 | British Aerospace | Acquisition system for multiple access optical communication system |
FR2628274B1 (en) * | 1988-03-02 | 1990-08-10 | Centre Nat Etd Spatiales | COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEM WITH MOBILES USING SATELLITES |
GB8905610D0 (en) * | 1989-03-11 | 1989-04-26 | British Aerospace | Geostationary satellite system |
US5439190A (en) | 1991-04-22 | 1995-08-08 | Trw Inc. | Medium-earth-altitude satellite-based cellular telecommunications |
IL98893A (en) | 1991-07-19 | 1996-07-23 | Mass Jonathan | Artificial satellite communication system |
US5931417A (en) * | 1992-06-02 | 1999-08-03 | Mobile Communications Holdings, Inc. | Non-geostationary orbit satellite constellation for continuous coverage of northern latitudes above 25° and its extension to global coverage tailored to the distribution of populated land masses on earth |
US5788187A (en) * | 1992-06-02 | 1998-08-04 | Mobile Communications Holdings, Inc. | Elliptical orbit satellite, system, and deployment with controllable coverage characteristics |
US5582367A (en) | 1992-06-02 | 1996-12-10 | Mobile Communications Holdings, Inc. | Elliptical orbit satellite, system, and deployment with controllable coverage characteristics |
FR2706102B1 (en) * | 1993-06-02 | 1995-07-07 | Alcatel Espace | Memory relay system for observation satellites. |
IT1261940B (en) * | 1993-09-24 | 1996-06-04 | Alenia Spazio Spa | TELECOMMUNICATIONS AND REMOTE SENSING SYSTEM VIA SATELLITE BASED ON THE USE OF SHORT-TERM ELLIPSY ELLIPTICAL ORBITS. |
TW239242B (en) | 1994-03-28 | 1995-01-21 | Leo One Ip L L C | Satellite system using equatorial & polar orbit relays |
US5589834A (en) * | 1994-04-22 | 1996-12-31 | Stanford Telecommunications, Inc. | Cost effective geosynchronous mobile satellite communication system |
TW274170B (en) | 1994-06-17 | 1996-04-11 | Terrastar Inc | Satellite communication system, receiving antenna & components for use therein |
US5619211A (en) | 1994-11-17 | 1997-04-08 | Motorola, Inc. | Position locating and communication system using multiple satellite constellations |
US5641134A (en) | 1994-12-27 | 1997-06-24 | Motorola, Inc. | Satellite cellular telephone and data communication system at an inclined orbit |
US5845206A (en) * | 1995-03-24 | 1998-12-01 | Virtual Geosatellite Holdings, Inc. | Elliptical satellite system which emulates the characteristics of geosynchronous satellites |
US5971324A (en) * | 1995-10-03 | 1999-10-26 | Trw Inc. | Multiple altitude satellite relay system and method |
US5991279A (en) | 1995-12-07 | 1999-11-23 | Vistar Telecommunications Inc. | Wireless packet data distributed communications system |
US5738309A (en) * | 1996-02-28 | 1998-04-14 | Hughes Electronics | Single axis correction for orbit inclination |
US6223019B1 (en) * | 1996-03-14 | 2001-04-24 | Sirius Satellite Radio Inc. | Efficient high latitude service area satellite mobile broadcasting systems |
US5810297A (en) | 1996-04-29 | 1998-09-22 | Basuthakur; Sibnath | Satellite cluster attitude/orbit determination and control system and method |
US6226493B1 (en) * | 1996-05-31 | 2001-05-01 | Motorola, Inc. | Geosynchronous satellite communication system and method |
EP0836290A3 (en) * | 1996-10-10 | 2000-04-19 | Nortel Networks Corporation | Satellite communication method using satellites on substantially circular orbit, inclined to the equatorial plane with period matching the earth period |
DE59701839D1 (en) | 1996-11-15 | 2000-07-13 | Contraves Space Ag Zuerich | Method and arrangement for maintaining the position of a geostationary swarm of satellites using an optical satellite connection |
FR2757824B1 (en) * | 1996-12-31 | 1999-03-26 | Europ Propulsion | METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR LAUNCHING SATELLITES ON NON-COPLANAR ORBITS USING LUNAR GRAVITATIONAL ASSISTANCE |
FR2757825B1 (en) * | 1996-12-31 | 1999-03-26 | Europ Propulsion | METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR SIMULTANEOUSLY LAUNCHING SATELLITES ON NON-COPLANAR ORBITS USING VERY ECCENTRIC ORBITES AND ATMOSPHERIC BRAKING |
US5918157A (en) | 1997-03-18 | 1999-06-29 | Globalstar L.P. | Satellite communications system having distributed user assignment and resource assignment with terrestrial gateways |
JP3153496B2 (en) | 1997-05-21 | 2001-04-09 | 株式会社日立製作所 | Communication service providing method using artificial satellite with long stay time in zenith direction |
US6019318A (en) * | 1997-06-16 | 2000-02-01 | Hugehs Electronics Corporation | Coordinatable system of inclined geosynchronous satellite orbits |
US5940739A (en) | 1997-10-24 | 1999-08-17 | Conrad; Charles | Multiple access satellite communications network |
US5979832A (en) * | 1998-01-22 | 1999-11-09 | Mobile Communication Holdings, Inc. | Dual ring array of satellites |
US6135389A (en) * | 1998-03-16 | 2000-10-24 | Hughes Electronics Corporation | Subterranean target steering strategy |
US6116545A (en) * | 1998-04-09 | 2000-09-12 | Hughes Electronics Corporation | Free return lunar flyby transfer method for geosynchronous satellites |
US6149103A (en) * | 1998-04-09 | 2000-11-21 | Hughes Electronics Corporation | Free return lunar flyby transfer method for geosynchronous satellites havint multiple perilune stages |
-
1999
- 1999-01-21 US US09/235,112 patent/US6327523B2/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
-
2000
- 2000-01-20 DE DE60034163T patent/DE60034163T2/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 2000-01-20 EP EP00101028A patent/EP1022867B1/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 2000-01-20 JP JP2000011942A patent/JP2000224090A/en active Pending
-
2001
- 2001-06-20 US US09/885,021 patent/US6389336B2/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
Cited By (8)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US6695260B2 (en) * | 2000-02-03 | 2004-02-24 | Virtual Geosatellite Llc | Virtually geostationary satellite array |
US20020177403A1 (en) * | 2001-02-09 | 2002-11-28 | Laprade James Nicholas | High availability broadband communications satellite system using satellite constellations in elliptical orbits inclined to the equatorial plane |
US20030228867A1 (en) * | 2002-01-29 | 2003-12-11 | David Castiel | Virtually geostationary satellite array with optimized parameters |
US7277673B2 (en) * | 2002-01-29 | 2007-10-02 | Virtual Geosatellite Llc | Virtually geostationary satellite array with optimized parameters |
US8360366B1 (en) * | 2009-03-12 | 2013-01-29 | Hsin-Hsien Chung | Diamond constellation of non-geostationary satellites for broadband multimedia communications |
US10329034B2 (en) | 2016-02-26 | 2019-06-25 | Space Systems/Loral, Llc | Efficient orbital storage and deployment for spacecraft in inclined geosynchronous orbit |
US10543937B2 (en) | 2016-02-26 | 2020-01-28 | Space Systems/Loral, Llc | Stationkeeping techniques for spacecraft in inclined geosynchronous orbit |
US10889388B2 (en) | 2016-02-26 | 2021-01-12 | Space Systems/Loral, Llc | Inclined geosynchronous orbit spacecraft constellations |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
EP1022867A2 (en) | 2000-07-26 |
DE60034163T2 (en) | 2007-12-13 |
US6327523B2 (en) | 2001-12-04 |
US6389336B2 (en) | 2002-05-14 |
DE60034163D1 (en) | 2007-05-16 |
US20010014842A1 (en) | 2001-08-16 |
JP2000224090A (en) | 2000-08-11 |
EP1022867A3 (en) | 2003-10-15 |
EP1022867B1 (en) | 2007-04-04 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US6389336B2 (en) | Overhead system of inclined eccentric geosynchronous orbiting satellites | |
US7480506B2 (en) | Satellite communication system | |
EP0886392B1 (en) | Coordinate system for inclined geosynchronous satellite orbits | |
Lutz et al. | Satellite systems for personal and broadband communications | |
US5551624A (en) | Medium-earth-altitude satellite-based cellular telecommunications | |
US6577864B2 (en) | Elliptical satellite system which emulates the characteristics of geosynchronous satellites | |
JP3696205B2 (en) | Non-stationary satellite constellation implementation system and method capable of easily tracking satellites | |
US7840180B2 (en) | Molniya orbit satellite systems, apparatus, and methods | |
US6701126B1 (en) | System and method for implementing a constellation of non-geostationary satellites that does not interfere with the geostationary satellite ring | |
US20030001048A1 (en) | Satellite system and method deploying same | |
CA2255220A1 (en) | Efficient high latitude service area satellite mobile broadcasting systems | |
US20130062471A1 (en) | Inclined orbit satellite communication system | |
JP2706600B2 (en) | Cellular telecommunications systems based on mid-earth altitude satellites. | |
US10225002B2 (en) | Satellite system with rolling wave handovers | |
CA2957065A1 (en) | Synthetically recreating the geostationary satellite orbital arc array with preferred elliptical orbit parameters | |
JPH05268131A (en) | Communication satellite network and its forming method | |
Draim et al. | Demonstration of the Cobra Teardrop concept using two smallsats in 8-hour elliptic orbits | |
EP1047211A2 (en) | Communication system with satellites at a high elevation angle | |
US20030114102A1 (en) | System and method for providing trans-polar satellite communications | |
Nelson et al. | Interference between satellite systems in non‐geostationary orbits | |
Stuart et al. | Review of ESA Archimedes study 1 | |
WO2002039616A2 (en) | Virtual geostationary satellite constellation and method of satellite communications | |
Umapathy | SATELLITE COMMUNICATION | |
Lutz et al. | Interference problems of co-channel communication satellite systems | |
Inciardi et al. | Demonstration of the COBRA Teardrop Concept Using Two Smallsats in 8-Hour Elliptic Orbits |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
FPAY | Fee payment |
Year of fee payment: 4 |
|
RR | Request for reexamination filed |
Effective date: 20070518 |
|
FPAY | Fee payment |
Year of fee payment: 8 |
|
FPB1 | Reexamination decision cancelled all claims | ||
REMI | Maintenance fee reminder mailed | ||
LAPS | Lapse for failure to pay maintenance fees | ||
STCH | Information on status: patent discontinuation |
Free format text: PATENT EXPIRED DUE TO NONPAYMENT OF MAINTENANCE FEES UNDER 37 CFR 1.362 |
|
FP | Lapsed due to failure to pay maintenance fee |
Effective date: 20140514 |