US20020027474A1 - Swept performance monitor for measuring and correcting RF power amplifier distortion - Google Patents
Swept performance monitor for measuring and correcting RF power amplifier distortion Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- US20020027474A1 US20020027474A1 US09/927,814 US92781401A US2002027474A1 US 20020027474 A1 US20020027474 A1 US 20020027474A1 US 92781401 A US92781401 A US 92781401A US 2002027474 A1 US2002027474 A1 US 2002027474A1
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- input
- output
- distortion
- amplifier
- receiver
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Granted
Links
- 238000012937 correction Methods 0.000 claims description 35
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 claims description 14
- 230000004044 response Effects 0.000 claims description 8
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 claims description 6
- 238000012545 processing Methods 0.000 claims description 6
- 238000011144 upstream manufacturing Methods 0.000 claims description 4
- 238000012544 monitoring process Methods 0.000 claims description 2
- 238000009795 derivation Methods 0.000 claims 1
- 238000002955 isolation Methods 0.000 abstract description 18
- 238000005259 measurement Methods 0.000 abstract description 13
- 239000000969 carrier Substances 0.000 abstract description 8
- 230000003044 adaptive effect Effects 0.000 abstract description 6
- 208000037909 invasive meningococcal disease Diseases 0.000 abstract description 3
- 238000010408 sweeping Methods 0.000 abstract description 2
- 238000001514 detection method Methods 0.000 description 11
- 238000004891 communication Methods 0.000 description 5
- 230000008901 benefit Effects 0.000 description 4
- 230000001276 controlling effect Effects 0.000 description 4
- 238000012986 modification Methods 0.000 description 4
- 230000004048 modification Effects 0.000 description 4
- 101100440934 Candida albicans (strain SC5314 / ATCC MYA-2876) CPH1 gene Proteins 0.000 description 3
- 101100273252 Candida parapsilosis SAPP1 gene Proteins 0.000 description 3
- 238000013459 approach Methods 0.000 description 3
- 230000008859 change Effects 0.000 description 3
- 230000007246 mechanism Effects 0.000 description 3
- 230000003595 spectral effect Effects 0.000 description 3
- 238000001228 spectrum Methods 0.000 description 3
- 239000003990 capacitor Substances 0.000 description 2
- 230000008878 coupling Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000010168 coupling process Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000005859 coupling reaction Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000010586 diagram Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000012546 transfer Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000010420 art technique Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000002238 attenuated effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000009286 beneficial effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000005574 cross-species transmission Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000013461 design Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000004519 manufacturing process Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000005457 optimization Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000010363 phase shift Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000001105 regulatory effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 229920006395 saturated elastomer Polymers 0.000 description 1
- 230000007480 spreading Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000003892 spreading Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000001052 transient effect Effects 0.000 description 1
Images
Classifications
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H03—ELECTRONIC CIRCUITRY
- H03F—AMPLIFIERS
- H03F1/00—Details of amplifiers with only discharge tubes, only semiconductor devices or only unspecified devices as amplifying elements
- H03F1/32—Modifications of amplifiers to reduce non-linear distortion
- H03F1/3223—Modifications of amplifiers to reduce non-linear distortion using feed-forward
- H03F1/3229—Modifications of amplifiers to reduce non-linear distortion using feed-forward using a loop for error extraction and another loop for error subtraction
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H03—ELECTRONIC CIRCUITRY
- H03F—AMPLIFIERS
- H03F1/00—Details of amplifiers with only discharge tubes, only semiconductor devices or only unspecified devices as amplifying elements
- H03F1/32—Modifications of amplifiers to reduce non-linear distortion
- H03F1/3241—Modifications of amplifiers to reduce non-linear distortion using predistortion circuits
- H03F1/3247—Modifications of amplifiers to reduce non-linear distortion using predistortion circuits using feedback acting on predistortion circuits
Definitions
- the present invention relates in general to radio frequency (RF) communication systems, and is particularly directed to an RF power amplifier distortion correction mechanism for controlling an adaptive digital signal processor-controlled pre-distortion circuit installed in the input path to an RF amplifier having a relatively “low” carrier to intermod ratio (C/I).
- the invention employs a swept oscillator to sweep input and output receivers, and locate and isolate the RF carrier component in the amplifier output, so that distortion energy produced at the output of the RF amplifier may be detected. Once detected, distortion energy may be controllably removed by the pre-distortion unit.
- Attenuating sidebands sufficiently to meet industry or regulatory-based standards using such modulation techniques requires very linear signal processing systems and components. Although relatively linear components can be obtained at a reasonable cost for the relatively low bandwidths (baseband) of telephone networks, linearizing components such as power amplifiers at RF frequencies can be prohibitively expensive.
- IMDs intermodulation distortion products
- a fundamental difficulty in linearizing an RF power amplifier is the fact that it is an inherently non-linear device, and generates unwanted intermodulation distortion products (IMDs) .
- IMDs manifest themselves as spurious signals in the amplified RF output signal, separate and distinct from the RF input signal.
- a further manifestation of IMD is spectral regrowth or spreading of a compact spectrum into spectral regions that were not occupied by the RF input signal. This distortion causes the phase-amplitude of the amplified output signal to depart from the phase-amplitude of the input signal, and may be considered as an incidental (and undesired) amplifier-sourced modulation of the RF input signal.
- a straightforward way to implement a linear RF power amplifier is to build it as a large, high power device, but operate the amplifier at a only a low power level (namely, at a small percentage of its rated output power), where the RF amplifiers transfer function is relatively linear.
- An obvious drawback to this approach is the overkill penalty—a costly and large sized RF device.
- Other prior art techniques which overcome this penalty include feedback correction techniques, feedforward correction, and pre-distortion correction.
- Feedback correction techniques include polar envelope correction (such as described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,742,201), and Cartesian feedback, where the distortion component at the output of the RF amplifier is used to directly modulate the input signal to the amplifier in real time.
- Feedback techniques possess the advantage of self-convergence, as do negative feedback techniques in other fields of design.
- systems which employ negative feedback remain stable over a limited bandwidth, which prevents their application in wide-bandwidth environments, such as multi-carrier or W-CDMA.
- Feedforward and predistortion correction are not limited in this regard.
- error present in the RF amplifier's output signal is extracted, amplified to the proper level, and then reinjected with equal amplitude but opposite phase into the output path of the amplifier, so that (ideally) the RF amplifier's distortion is effectively canceled.
- predistortion correction When predistortion correction is used, a signal is modulated onto the RF input signal path upstream of the RF amplifier.
- the characteristic of an ideal predistortion signal is the inverse of the distortion expected at the output of the high power RF amplifier, so that when subjected to the distorting transfer function of the RF amplifier, it effectively cancels the distortion behavior.
- Either predistortion or feedforward may be made adaptive by extracting an error signal component in the output of the RF amplifier and then adjusting the control signal(s), in accordance with the extracted error behavior of the RF amplifier, so as to effectively continuously minimize distortion in the amplifier's output.
- One conventional mechanism for extracting the error signal component involves injecting a pilot (tone) signal into the signal flow path through the amplifier and measure the amplifier's response.
- a fundamental drawback to the use of a pilot tone is the need for dedicated pilot generation circuitry and the difficulty of placing the pilot tone within the signal bandwidth of the amplifier.
- Other approaches employ a high intercept receiver to detect low level distortion in the presence of high power carriers, which adds substantial complexity and cost.
- RF power amplifier distortion in the presence of multi-frequency input signals is accurately measured by using a swept local oscillator to tune RF input and output receivers.
- the swept local oscillator scheme may be configured as diagrammatically shown in FIG. 1 (which corresponds to FIG. 1 of the '723 application) .
- relatively low C/I ratio RF amplifier is meant one whose RF carrier level is effectively indistinguishable from that of intermodulation products.
- the term low C/I ratio may be considered to apply to those RF amplifiers having intermodulation products above ⁇ 50 dBC.
- an RF input signal RF in to be amplified is coupled to an input port 11 of a signal input path to RF power amplifier 10 , the distortion characteristic of which is to be measured by a controllably blanked distortion energy detector subsection 100 .
- the RF input port 11 is coupled through a first directional coupler 13 to a first input 21 of a mixer 22 of a controllably tuned or swept input receiver 20 , and to a digitally controlled predistortion unit 14 installed in the signal input path to RF power amplifier 10 .
- the predistortion unit 14 is operative to dynamically adjust the amplitude and phase of the RF input signal to the RF amplifier 10 , and may contain a vector modulator driven by a complex polynomial work function.
- Predistortion unit 14 is coupled to receive weighting coefficients w 0 , w 1 , w 2 , . . . w N , supplied over a multi-link 15 by a performance monitoring and parameter updating digital signal processor (DSP) 16 .
- DSP executes 16 one or more error minimization algorithms (e.g., power or least mean square) for controllably adjusting the distortion introduced into the RF signal input path through the predistortion unit 14 .
- error minimization algorithms e.g., power or least mean square
- the output of RF power amplifier 10 is coupled to an RF output port RF out , and through a second directional coupler 17 to a first input 31 of a mixer 32 within a controllably tuned or swept output receiver 30 .
- the output of the directional coupler 17 is representative of the amplified original RF input signal and any intermodulation (spectral regrowth) distortion products (IMDs) introduced by the RF amplifier.
- IMDs intermodulation (spectral regrowth) distortion products
- Each of the input and output receivers 20 , 30 is controlled by a digital sweep-control signal generated by the DSP 16 .
- digital sweep-control signal lines 17 are coupled to a digital-to-analog converter (DAC) 41 , which produces an analog output sweep voltage that is filtered in a low pass filter 43 and coupled to a voltage controlled oscillator (VCO) 45 .
- VCO voltage controlled oscillator
- the output of the VCO 45 is coupled to an input port 51 of a Wilkinson splitter 50 .
- the Wilkinson splitter 50 has a first output port 52 , which is coupled through a buffer amplifier 55 to a second input 23 of mixer 22 , and a second output port 53 , which is coupled through a buffer amplifier 57 to a second input 33 of mixer 32 .
- the IF output 25 of mixer 22 is filtered by a wider band bandpass filter 61 and coupled through a buffer amplifier 63 to a carrier power detector 65 , shown as a diode, whose cathode is capacitor-coupled to ground.
- the carrier power detector 65 has its output coupled to a threshold detector 67 , the output of which is coupled to a blanking detector input 18 of the DSP 16 , and to respective control ports 71 , 81 of first and second, high isolation switches 70 and 80 within the output receiver 30 .
- the output of the threshold detector 67 is at a first logic state. However, if carrier power detector 65 detects power in excess of the prescribed threshold, the output of the threshold detector 67 changes to a second logic state. This change in state of the output of the threshold detector 67 controls the blanking signal input 18 to the DSP 16 so as to controllably blank the output receiver 30 , through which RF amplifier distortion is measured.
- the IF output 35 of mixer 32 is coupled to a first input port 72 of first isolation switch 70 , a second input port 73 of which is impedance-terminated, as shown.
- the first high isolation switch 70 has an output port 74 coupled through a narrower band bandpass filter 75 to a first input port 82 of the second high isolation switch 80 , a second input port 83 of which is impedance-terminated, as shown.
- Isolation switch 80 has an output port 84 coupled through an IF buffer amplifier 85 to a diode-configured (distortion) power detector 91 , whose cathode is capacitor-coupled to ground, and which serves to measure the distortion power within the output receiver bandwidth generated by the RF amplifier 10 .
- the distortion power detection diode 91 has its output (cathode) coupled through a lowpass filter 93 to an analog-to-digital converter (ADC) 95 , the digitized output of which is coupled over link 97 to a distortion detection input 19 of the DSP 16 .
- ADC analog-to-digital converter
- This digitized output of the distortion power detection diode 91 is integrated and processed by the DSP 16 using one or more error minimization algorithms for controlling variable attenuator and phase shift components in predistortion unit 14 .
- the signal path through the output receiver 30 is normally coupled through the first and second isolation switches 70 and 80 to the distortion power detection diode 91 .
- the output of power detection diode 91 is sampled, digitized and coupled to the distortion input 19 of the DSP 16 .
- the tuning frequency for each of the input and output receivers 20 and 30 is swept in common.
- the power detected by the carrier power detector diode 65 of the input receiver 20 is applied to threshold detector 67 , whose threshold differentiates between carriers and distortion.
- the output of the receiver 30 is the distortion power produced in the RF power amplifier 10 .
- This distortion power is digitized and coupled to the processor 16 , and integrated over an entire sweep for controlling the predistortion correction unit 14 .
- the output of the threshold detector 67 changes state. This change of state signal blanks the DSP 16 and causes the signal paths through the isolation switches 70 and 80 to be interrupted, effectively blanking the output receiver 30 , so that the distortion correction operation performed by the DSP 16 is not affected by the carrier.
- This, selective, carrier-based blanking of the distortion measurement receiver circuitry effectively prevents saturation of the output receiver's IF amplifier 85 , and allows the use of lower IP3 components.
- the bandwidth of the input receiver 20 which is dictated by the bandpass filter 61 , may be made slightly wider than the bandwidth of the output receiver 30 to provide a guardband, as appropriate, for the switching operation.
- the high isolation switches 70 and 80 serve to improve the dynamic range of the receiver in two ways. First, they prevent the IF components from being overloaded by the carrier, as the carrier is swept through the IF passband. This undesirable overload would drive the amplifiers and the detectors into saturation, and these elements would require some period of time to leave saturation, and reenter normal, active-mode operation. Secondly, the isolation switches prevent the bandpass filter circuitry from being excited by a sudden transient, as the carrier is swept into the IF passband. As the bandpass filter is a relatively narrow, highly resonant filter, such step transients would cause the filter to ‘ring’ over a relatively long decay time.
- the Wilkinson splitter that is used to couple the swept oscillator to the respective mixers of the input and output receivers is replaced by a resistive Y splitter, which has a flatter frequency response than a Wilkinson splitter, and enables the output level of the VCO to be held constant as it is swept over frequency.
- the input and output signal paths through the input receiver's mixer are coupled through one or more cascaded buffer amplifier stages, to improve reverse isolation and prevent the VCO signal from coupling back into the input path to the RF amplifier.
- parameters of the input receiver's amplifier stages and the bandpass filters are selected to avoid damaging any of the components.
- the DSP uses sampled input power information to control the threshold setting of the threshold detector. Adapting the threshold to sampled input power provides the DSP with the ability to adapt the carrier detection threshold to different power levels.
- the high isolation switches of the swept output receiver are removed, and the IF output of the output receiver's mixer is coupled through a cascaded arrangement of amplifier gain stages and band bandpass filters.
- the bandpass filters of the output receiver can be made identical to the bandpass filter in the swept input receiver. This makes the output receiver's bandwidth slightly narrower than the input receiver, and helps minimize the number of different parts used in the circuit. In both the input and output receivers, the gains of the receiver amplifier stages and the losses through the bandpass filters are selected so as to avoid damaging the power detection diode and any other components.
- FIG. 1 diagrammatically illustrates an RF power amplifier distortion measurement and pre-distortion correction scheme in accordance with the invention described in the above-referenced '723 application);
- FIG. 2 diagrammatically illustrates a modification of FIG. 1 to realize the switchless RF power amplifier distortion measurement and correction scheme of the invention.
- the modified scheme of the invention resides primarily in a prescribed arrangement of conventional RF communication circuits, associated digital signal processing components and attendant supervisory control circuitry, that controls the operation of such circuits and components.
- the configuration of such circuits components, and the manner in which they interface with other communication system equipment have, for the most part, been illustrated in the drawings by readily understandable block diagrams, which show only those details that are pertinent to the present invention, so as not to obscure the disclosure with details which will be readily apparent to those skilled in the art having the benefit of the description herein.
- the block diagram illustrations are primarily intended to show the major components of an RF amplifier distortion measurement and correction system in a convenient functional grouping, whereby the present invention may be more readily understood.
- FIG. 2 diagrammatically illustrates a switchless version of the RF power amplifier distortion measurement and correction scheme of FIG. 1.
- amplifier distortion is corrected by means of an adaptive predistortion circuit 14 installed in the input path 11 to RF amplifier 10 , which has a relatively “low” carrier-to-intermod ratio (C/I).
- C/I ratio RF amplifier is meant an amplifier whose RF carrier level is effectively indistinguishable from that of intermodulation products, and may be considered to apply to RF amplifiers having intermodulation products above ⁇ 50 dBC.
- the switchless architecture of FIG. 2 differs from the distortion measurement and correction scheme of FIG. 1 in the following respects.
- the Wilkinson splitter 50 used to coupled the output of the swept oscillator 45 to swept input and output receivers 20 and 30 , respectively is replaced by a resistive Y splitter 150 , which has a flatter frequency response than a Wilkinson splitter, and thus complies with the desire to maintain the output level of the VCO 45 constant as it is swept over frequency.
- the resistive Y splitter 150 has a first resistor arm 151 coupled to the output of oscillator 45 .
- a second resistor arm 152 is coupled through buffer amplifier 55 to the second input 23 of the input receiver's mixer 22 .
- a third resistor arm 153 is coupled through buffer amplifier 57 to the second input 33 of the output receiver's mixer 32 .
- the input signal path through the coupler 13 to the input mixer 22 is coupled through one or more cascaded buffer amplifier stages 121 , which serve to improve reverse isolation and prevent the VCO signal from coupling back through directional coupler 13 into the input path to the RF amplifier 10 .
- the gains of the input receiver's amplifier stages 121 , 125 and 63 and the losses through the coupler 13 , mixer 22 and bandpass filter 61 are selected so as to strategically avoid damaging any of the components.
- the output of the carrier power detector 65 is digitized by an ADC 165 , the digitized output of which is coupled to an input power detection input 166 of the DSP 16 .
- the DSP 16 uses this sampled input power information to generate a threshold setting, which is coupled by way of a threshold control output port 167 through a DAC 168 to the threshold detector 67 .
- Providing an adaptive threshold based upon sampled input power provides the DSP with the ability to adapt the carrier detection threshold to different power levels.
- the high isolation switches 70 and 80 of the swept output receiver 30 are removed.
- the IF output 35 of the output receiver's mixer 32 is coupled through a cascaded arrangement of amplifier gain stages and narrower bandpass filters.
- the mixer output 35 may be coupled through an amplifier stage 135 through a band bandpass filter 175 to cascaded amplifier stages 176 and 177 .
- the output of the amplifier stage 177 may be coupled through a further band bandpass filter 178 to the IF buffer amplifier 85 .
- the bandpass filters 175 and 177 can be made identical to the bandpass filter 61 in the swept input receiver. This makes the output receiver's bandwidth slightly narrower than the input receiver, and helps minimize the number of different parts used in the circuit.
- the gains of the receiver amplifier stages and the losses through the bandpass filters are selected, so as to avoid damaging the power detection diode 91 and any other components (for example, where the cascaded amplifier, filter and detector stages of the IF section are driven into hard saturation).
- the saturated output power capability of amplifier stage 85 may be on the order of 12-13 dBm, while detector 91 may be capable of safely absorbing an input of 17 dBm.
- the signal path through the buffer amplifier and bandpass filter stages of the output receiver 30 to the distortion power detection diode 91 is sampled, digitized and coupled to the distortion input 19 of the DSP 16 .
- the tuning frequency for each of the input and output receivers 20 and 30 is swept in common.
- the power detected by the carrier power detector diode 65 of the input receiver 20 is applied to threshold detector 67 , whose controlled threshold setting serves to differentiate between carriers and distortion.
- the output of the receiver section 30 is representative of the distortion power produced in the RF power amplifier 10 .
- This distortion power representation is digitized and coupled to the processor 16 , which uses this information as the basis for controlling the predistortion correction circuitry 14 in the input path to the amplifier 10 .
- the output of the carrier power detector 65 exceeds the threshold of threshold detector 67 (indicating that the output receiver is tuned near carrier energy)
- the output of the threshold detector 67 changes to its second logic state. This change of state signal is supplied to the blanking input 18 of DSP 16 , and prevents the distortion correction operation performed by the DSP 16 from being affected by the carrier.
- the bandwidth of the carrier (which may be on the order of 8 MHz, as a non-limiting example) is relatively ‘large’ compared to the IF passband width (which may be on the order of 250 KHz).
- the RF amplifier 10 may comprise a single-carrier, single-mode (W-CDMA only) amplifier, whose C/I specification is relatively low (e.g. on the order of 40 dB at the carrier edges).
- the sweep rate of the VCO 45 is relatively slow (e.g., requiring twenty milliseconds to sweep from the edge of carrier to a scan location several MHz away), compared to the decay of the bandpass filter (in relation to its group delay, which may be on the order of one millisecond).
- the unnecessary complexity of using high isolation switches in the signal flow path of the output receiver in certain applications of the invention described in the above-referenced '723 application may be effectively obviated by replacing the controllably blanked isolation switches of the swept output receiver with buffer amplifier—passband filter stages.
- These buffer-filter stages not only function to provide additional gain to offset the fact that the signal level extracted from the output amplifier is very low, and to prevent producing IMDs in the swept receiver's mixer, but may be implemented of the same bandpass filter in the swept input receiver. This makes the output receiver's bandwidth slightly narrower than the input receiver, and serves to minimize the number of different parts used in the circuit.
- the gains of buffer amplifier stages and the losses through the bandpass filters are selected, so as to avoid damaging any other components.
- the switchless, swept oscillator configuration of the present invention enables RF power amplifier distortion to be accurately measured, even in the presence of multi-frequency input signals.
Abstract
Description
- The present application is a continuation-in-part of co-pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/479,723, filed Jan. 7, 2000 (hereinafter referred to as the '723 application), and further claims the benefit of co-pending U.S. Provisional Patent Application Serial No. 60/175,279, filed Jan. 10, 2000, each of which applications is assigned to the assignee of the present application and the disclosures of which are incorporated herein.
- The present invention relates in general to radio frequency (RF) communication systems, and is particularly directed to an RF power amplifier distortion correction mechanism for controlling an adaptive digital signal processor-controlled pre-distortion circuit installed in the input path to an RF amplifier having a relatively “low” carrier to intermod ratio (C/I). The invention employs a swept oscillator to sweep input and output receivers, and locate and isolate the RF carrier component in the amplifier output, so that distortion energy produced at the output of the RF amplifier may be detected. Once detected, distortion energy may be controllably removed by the pre-distortion unit.
- As described in the above-referenced co-pending '723 application, specifications and regulations of the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) mandate that communication service providers comply with very strict bandwidth constraints, including the requirement that the amount of energy spillover outside a licensed channel or band of interest, be sharply attenuated (e.g., on the order of 50 dB). Although such limitations may be readily overcome for traditional forms of modulation, such as FM, they are difficult to achieve using more contemporary, digitally based modulation formats, such as M-ary modulation.
- Attenuating sidebands sufficiently to meet industry or regulatory-based standards using such modulation techniques requires very linear signal processing systems and components. Although relatively linear components can be obtained at a reasonable cost for the relatively low bandwidths (baseband) of telephone networks, linearizing components such as power amplifiers at RF frequencies can be prohibitively expensive.
- A fundamental difficulty in linearizing an RF power amplifier is the fact that it is an inherently non-linear device, and generates unwanted intermodulation distortion products (IMDs) . IMDs manifest themselves as spurious signals in the amplified RF output signal, separate and distinct from the RF input signal. A further manifestation of IMD is spectral regrowth or spreading of a compact spectrum into spectral regions that were not occupied by the RF input signal. This distortion causes the phase-amplitude of the amplified output signal to depart from the phase-amplitude of the input signal, and may be considered as an incidental (and undesired) amplifier-sourced modulation of the RF input signal.
- A straightforward way to implement a linear RF power amplifier is to build it as a large, high power device, but operate the amplifier at a only a low power level (namely, at a small percentage of its rated output power), where the RF amplifiers transfer function is relatively linear. An obvious drawback to this approach is the overkill penalty—a costly and large sized RF device. Other prior art techniques which overcome this penalty include feedback correction techniques, feedforward correction, and pre-distortion correction.
- Feedback correction techniques include polar envelope correction (such as described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,742,201), and Cartesian feedback, where the distortion component at the output of the RF amplifier is used to directly modulate the input signal to the amplifier in real time. Feedback techniques possess the advantage of self-convergence, as do negative feedback techniques in other fields of design. However, systems which employ negative feedback remain stable over a limited bandwidth, which prevents their application in wide-bandwidth environments, such as multi-carrier or W-CDMA. Feedforward and predistortion correction, however, are not limited in this regard. In the feedforward approach, error (distortion) present in the RF amplifier's output signal is extracted, amplified to the proper level, and then reinjected with equal amplitude but opposite phase into the output path of the amplifier, so that (ideally) the RF amplifier's distortion is effectively canceled.
- When predistortion correction is used, a signal is modulated onto the RF input signal path upstream of the RF amplifier. The characteristic of an ideal predistortion signal is the inverse of the distortion expected at the output of the high power RF amplifier, so that when subjected to the distorting transfer function of the RF amplifier, it effectively cancels the distortion behavior.
- Either predistortion or feedforward may be made adaptive by extracting an error signal component in the output of the RF amplifier and then adjusting the control signal(s), in accordance with the extracted error behavior of the RF amplifier, so as to effectively continuously minimize distortion in the amplifier's output.
- One conventional mechanism for extracting the error signal component involves injecting a pilot (tone) signal into the signal flow path through the amplifier and measure the amplifier's response. A fundamental drawback to the use of a pilot tone is the need for dedicated pilot generation circuitry and the difficulty of placing the pilot tone within the signal bandwidth of the amplifier. Other approaches employ a high intercept receiver to detect low level distortion in the presence of high power carriers, which adds substantial complexity and cost.
- Pursuant to the invention described in the '723 application, RF power amplifier distortion in the presence of multi-frequency input signals is accurately measured by using a swept local oscillator to tune RF input and output receivers. Where that distortion is corrected by means of an adaptive predistortion circuit installed in the input path to an RF amplifier having a relatively “low” carrier to intermod ratio (C/I), the swept local oscillator scheme may be configured as diagrammatically shown in FIG. 1 (which corresponds to FIG. 1 of the '723 application) . By relatively low C/I ratio RF amplifier is meant one whose RF carrier level is effectively indistinguishable from that of intermodulation products. As a non-limiting example, the term low C/I ratio may be considered to apply to those RF amplifiers having intermodulation products above −50 dBC.
- In the architecture of FIG. 1, an RF input signal RFin to be amplified is coupled to an
input port 11 of a signal input path toRF power amplifier 10, the distortion characteristic of which is to be measured by a controllably blanked distortionenergy detector subsection 100. In order to monitor the RF input signal RFin for the presence of carrier energy, theRF input port 11 is coupled through a firstdirectional coupler 13 to afirst input 21 of amixer 22 of a controllably tuned or sweptinput receiver 20, and to a digitally controlledpredistortion unit 14 installed in the signal input path toRF power amplifier 10. - The
predistortion unit 14 is operative to dynamically adjust the amplitude and phase of the RF input signal to theRF amplifier 10, and may contain a vector modulator driven by a complex polynomial work function.Predistortion unit 14 is coupled to receive weighting coefficients w0, w1, w2, . . . wN, supplied over a multi-link 15 by a performance monitoring and parameter updating digital signal processor (DSP) 16. DSP executes 16 one or more error minimization algorithms (e.g., power or least mean square) for controllably adjusting the distortion introduced into the RF signal input path through thepredistortion unit 14. - The output of
RF power amplifier 10 is coupled to an RF output port RFout, and through a seconddirectional coupler 17 to afirst input 31 of amixer 32 within a controllably tuned or sweptoutput receiver 30. The output of thedirectional coupler 17 is representative of the amplified original RF input signal and any intermodulation (spectral regrowth) distortion products (IMDs) introduced by the RF amplifier. - Each of the input and
output receivers DSP 16. For this purpose, digital sweep-control signal lines 17 are coupled to a digital-to-analog converter (DAC) 41, which produces an analog output sweep voltage that is filtered in alow pass filter 43 and coupled to a voltage controlled oscillator (VCO) 45. The output of theVCO 45 is coupled to aninput port 51 of a Wilkinsonsplitter 50. - The Wilkinson
splitter 50 has afirst output port 52, which is coupled through abuffer amplifier 55 to asecond input 23 ofmixer 22, and asecond output port 53, which is coupled through abuffer amplifier 57 to asecond input 33 ofmixer 32. TheIF output 25 ofmixer 22 is filtered by a widerband bandpass filter 61 and coupled through abuffer amplifier 63 to acarrier power detector 65, shown as a diode, whose cathode is capacitor-coupled to ground. Thecarrier power detector 65 has its output coupled to athreshold detector 67, the output of which is coupled to ablanking detector input 18 of theDSP 16, and torespective control ports high isolation switches output receiver 30. - In the absence of the output of the
carrier power detector 65 exceeding a prescribed threshold associated with an RF carrier signal, the output of thethreshold detector 67 is at a first logic state. However, ifcarrier power detector 65 detects power in excess of the prescribed threshold, the output of thethreshold detector 67 changes to a second logic state. This change in state of the output of thethreshold detector 67 controls theblanking signal input 18 to theDSP 16 so as to controllably blank theoutput receiver 30, through which RF amplifier distortion is measured. - To this end, the
IF output 35 ofmixer 32 is coupled to afirst input port 72 offirst isolation switch 70, asecond input port 73 of which is impedance-terminated, as shown. The firsthigh isolation switch 70 has anoutput port 74 coupled through a narrowerband bandpass filter 75 to afirst input port 82 of the secondhigh isolation switch 80, asecond input port 83 of which is impedance-terminated, as shown.Isolation switch 80 has anoutput port 84 coupled through anIF buffer amplifier 85 to a diode-configured (distortion)power detector 91, whose cathode is capacitor-coupled to ground, and which serves to measure the distortion power within the output receiver bandwidth generated by theRF amplifier 10. - The distortion
power detection diode 91 has its output (cathode) coupled through alowpass filter 93 to an analog-to-digital converter (ADC) 95, the digitized output of which is coupled overlink 97 to adistortion detection input 19 of theDSP 16. This digitized output of the distortionpower detection diode 91 is integrated and processed by theDSP 16 using one or more error minimization algorithms for controlling variable attenuator and phase shift components inpredistortion unit 14. - In accordance with the operation of the controllably blanked distortion
energy measurement subsection 100, the signal path through theoutput receiver 30 is normally coupled through the first andsecond isolation switches power detection diode 91. The output ofpower detection diode 91 is sampled, digitized and coupled to thedistortion input 19 of theDSP 16. As theDSP 16 sweeps the control voltage input to theVCO 45, the tuning frequency for each of the input andoutput receivers power detector diode 65 of theinput receiver 20 is applied tothreshold detector 67, whose threshold differentiates between carriers and distortion. - As long as the threshold of the
threshold detector 67 is not exceeded, it is inferred that the output of thereceiver 30 is the distortion power produced in theRF power amplifier 10. This distortion power is digitized and coupled to theprocessor 16, and integrated over an entire sweep for controlling thepredistortion correction unit 14. However, when the output of thecarrier power detector 65 exceeds the threshold ofthreshold detector 67—indicating that the output receiver is tuned near carrier energy—the output of thethreshold detector 67 changes state. This change of state signal blanks theDSP 16 and causes the signal paths through theisolation switches output receiver 30, so that the distortion correction operation performed by theDSP 16 is not affected by the carrier. - This, selective, carrier-based blanking of the distortion measurement receiver circuitry effectively prevents saturation of the output receiver's
IF amplifier 85, and allows the use of lower IP3 components. The bandwidth of theinput receiver 20, which is dictated by thebandpass filter 61, may be made slightly wider than the bandwidth of theoutput receiver 30 to provide a guardband, as appropriate, for the switching operation. - In the architecture of FIG. 1, the high isolation switches70 and 80 serve to improve the dynamic range of the receiver in two ways. First, they prevent the IF components from being overloaded by the carrier, as the carrier is swept through the IF passband. This undesirable overload would drive the amplifiers and the detectors into saturation, and these elements would require some period of time to leave saturation, and reenter normal, active-mode operation. Secondly, the isolation switches prevent the bandpass filter circuitry from being excited by a sudden transient, as the carrier is swept into the IF passband. As the bandpass filter is a relatively narrow, highly resonant filter, such step transients would cause the filter to ‘ring’ over a relatively long decay time.
- Both of these effects may cause an error in ACPR measurement in that portion of the spectrum immediately adjacent to the desired carriers. Unfortunately, this also happens to be the region within the spectrum where most of the IMD caused by the RF power amplifier is concentrated, and where minimization of IMDs is most desirable. The effect of such an error could cause optimization of ACPR to be unbalanced between the two sidebands surrounding a carrier. One sideband might become optimized to a better-than-required ACPR at the expense of performance in the other sideband.
- This effect is most undesirable where all of the energy of one or more of the carriers is capable of passing entirely within the bandwidth of the IF filter (namely, the ratio of carrier C bandwidth to IF bandwidth is low). This will result in maximized ringing in the bandpass filter. It is also undesirable in multi-carrier amplifiers, where more receive dynamic range is required, since some carriers have all of their energy confined to a relatively small bandwidth, while other carriers have their energy ‘spread’ over a considerable bandwidth (e.g., IS-95 CDMA).
- The effect of the error is further undesirable where a high C/I ratio (on the order of greater than 50 dB) of the amplifier system is specified, which also requires a high dynamic range. Finally, this effect is undesirable where a very fast VCO sweep rate is required, and it would not be practical or beneficial to slow the sweep rate.
- There exist situations where only a small number of wideband signals (e.g., five) are present and slow frequency sweeping is acceptable. Pursuant to the present invention, in such situations, the above-described benefits of using high isolation switches in the signal flow path of the output receiver of the performance measurement and correction architecture of the above-referenced '723 application are not required. In these cases, the architecture of the '723 application may be simplified by replacing the controllably blanked isolation switches of the swept output receiver with buffer amplifier—filter stages. The buffer amplifierfilter stages provide additional gain to offset the very low signal level extracted from the RF amplifier, and prevent the production of IMDs in the swept receiver's mixer.
- As will be described, in the ‘switchless’ distortion measurement and correction architecture of the present invention, the Wilkinson splitter that is used to couple the swept oscillator to the respective mixers of the input and output receivers is replaced by a resistive Y splitter, which has a flatter frequency response than a Wilkinson splitter, and enables the output level of the VCO to be held constant as it is swept over frequency. In addition, the input and output signal paths through the input receiver's mixer are coupled through one or more cascaded buffer amplifier stages, to improve reverse isolation and prevent the VCO signal from coupling back into the input path to the RF amplifier. Also, parameters of the input receiver's amplifier stages and the bandpass filters are selected to avoid damaging any of the components.
- Further, the DSP uses sampled input power information to control the threshold setting of the threshold detector. Adapting the threshold to sampled input power provides the DSP with the ability to adapt the carrier detection threshold to different power levels. In addition, the high isolation switches of the swept output receiver are removed, and the IF output of the output receiver's mixer is coupled through a cascaded arrangement of amplifier gain stages and band bandpass filters.
- The bandpass filters of the output receiver can be made identical to the bandpass filter in the swept input receiver. This makes the output receiver's bandwidth slightly narrower than the input receiver, and helps minimize the number of different parts used in the circuit. In both the input and output receivers, the gains of the receiver amplifier stages and the losses through the bandpass filters are selected so as to avoid damaging the power detection diode and any other components.
- FIG. 1 diagrammatically illustrates an RF power amplifier distortion measurement and pre-distortion correction scheme in accordance with the invention described in the above-referenced '723 application); and
- FIG. 2 diagrammatically illustrates a modification of FIG. 1 to realize the switchless RF power amplifier distortion measurement and correction scheme of the invention.
- Before describing in detail the new and improved ‘switchless’ RF power amplifier distortion measurement and correction mechanism of the present invention, it should be observed that the modified scheme of the invention resides primarily in a prescribed arrangement of conventional RF communication circuits, associated digital signal processing components and attendant supervisory control circuitry, that controls the operation of such circuits and components. As a result, the configuration of such circuits components, and the manner in which they interface with other communication system equipment have, for the most part, been illustrated in the drawings by readily understandable block diagrams, which show only those details that are pertinent to the present invention, so as not to obscure the disclosure with details which will be readily apparent to those skilled in the art having the benefit of the description herein. Thus, the block diagram illustrations are primarily intended to show the major components of an RF amplifier distortion measurement and correction system in a convenient functional grouping, whereby the present invention may be more readily understood.
- Attention is now directed to FIG. 2, which diagrammatically illustrates a switchless version of the RF power amplifier distortion measurement and correction scheme of FIG. 1. As in the circuit of FIG. 1, amplifier distortion is corrected by means of an
adaptive predistortion circuit 14 installed in theinput path 11 toRF amplifier 10, which has a relatively “low” carrier-to-intermod ratio (C/I). As pointed out above, by relatively low C/I ratio RF amplifier is meant an amplifier whose RF carrier level is effectively indistinguishable from that of intermodulation products, and may be considered to apply to RF amplifiers having intermodulation products above −50 dBC. - The switchless architecture of FIG. 2 differs from the distortion measurement and correction scheme of FIG. 1 in the following respects. First, the
Wilkinson splitter 50 used to coupled the output of the sweptoscillator 45 to swept input andoutput receivers resistive Y splitter 150, which has a flatter frequency response than a Wilkinson splitter, and thus complies with the desire to maintain the output level of theVCO 45 constant as it is swept over frequency. Theresistive Y splitter 150 has a first resistor arm 151 coupled to the output ofoscillator 45. A second resistor arm 152 is coupled throughbuffer amplifier 55 to thesecond input 23 of the input receiver'smixer 22. A third resistor arm 153 is coupled throughbuffer amplifier 57 to thesecond input 33 of the output receiver'smixer 32. - Pursuant to a second aspect of the invention, the input signal path through the
coupler 13 to theinput mixer 22 is coupled through one or more cascaded buffer amplifier stages 121, which serve to improve reverse isolation and prevent the VCO signal from coupling back throughdirectional coupler 13 into the input path to theRF amplifier 10. The gains of the input receiver's amplifier stages 121, 125 and 63 and the losses through thecoupler 13,mixer 22 andbandpass filter 61 are selected so as to strategically avoid damaging any of the components. - Thirdly, in addition to being coupled to the
threshold detector 67, the output of thecarrier power detector 65 is digitized by anADC 165, the digitized output of which is coupled to an inputpower detection input 166 of theDSP 16. TheDSP 16 uses this sampled input power information to generate a threshold setting, which is coupled by way of a thresholdcontrol output port 167 through aDAC 168 to thethreshold detector 67. Providing an adaptive threshold based upon sampled input power provides the DSP with the ability to adapt the carrier detection threshold to different power levels. - In accordance with a fourth modification of the invention, the high isolation switches70 and 80 of the swept
output receiver 30 are removed. To this end, theIF output 35 of the output receiver'smixer 32 is coupled through a cascaded arrangement of amplifier gain stages and narrower bandpass filters. As a non-limiting example, themixer output 35 may be coupled through anamplifier stage 135 through a band bandpass filter 175 to cascaded amplifier stages 176 and 177. The output of theamplifier stage 177 may be coupled through a furtherband bandpass filter 178 to theIF buffer amplifier 85. These additional gain stages are employed since the signal level extracted fromoutput coupler 17 is very low to avoid producing IMDs in themixer 32. The bandpass filters 175 and 177 can be made identical to thebandpass filter 61 in the swept input receiver. This makes the output receiver's bandwidth slightly narrower than the input receiver, and helps minimize the number of different parts used in the circuit. As in the input receiver, the gains of the receiver amplifier stages and the losses through the bandpass filters are selected, so as to avoid damaging thepower detection diode 91 and any other components (for example, where the cascaded amplifier, filter and detector stages of the IF section are driven into hard saturation). For example, the saturated output power capability ofamplifier stage 85 may be on the order of 12-13 dBm, whiledetector 91 may be capable of safely absorbing an input of 17 dBm. - In operation, the signal path through the buffer amplifier and bandpass filter stages of the
output receiver 30 to the distortionpower detection diode 91 is sampled, digitized and coupled to thedistortion input 19 of theDSP 16. As in the circuit of FIG. 1, as theDSP 16 sweeps the control voltage input to theVCO 45, the tuning frequency for each of the input andoutput receivers power detector diode 65 of theinput receiver 20 is applied tothreshold detector 67, whose controlled threshold setting serves to differentiate between carriers and distortion. As long as the established threshold of thethreshold detector 67 is not exceeded, it is inferred that the output of thereceiver section 30 is representative of the distortion power produced in theRF power amplifier 10. This distortion power representation is digitized and coupled to theprocessor 16, which uses this information as the basis for controlling thepredistortion correction circuitry 14 in the input path to theamplifier 10. - When the output of the
carrier power detector 65 exceeds the threshold of threshold detector 67 (indicating that the output receiver is tuned near carrier energy), the output of thethreshold detector 67 changes to its second logic state. This change of state signal is supplied to the blankinginput 18 ofDSP 16, and prevents the distortion correction operation performed by theDSP 16 from being affected by the carrier. - In the architecture of FIG. 2, the bandwidth of the carrier (which may be on the order of 8 MHz, as a non-limiting example) is relatively ‘large’ compared to the IF passband width (which may be on the order of 250 KHz). The
RF amplifier 10 may comprise a single-carrier, single-mode (W-CDMA only) amplifier, whose C/I specification is relatively low (e.g. on the order of 40 dB at the carrier edges). Also, the sweep rate of theVCO 45 is relatively slow (e.g., requiring twenty milliseconds to sweep from the edge of carrier to a scan location several MHz away), compared to the decay of the bandpass filter (in relation to its group delay, which may be on the order of one millisecond). - As will be appreciated from the foregoing description of the switchless distortion measurement and correction architecture of the present invention, the unnecessary complexity of using high isolation switches in the signal flow path of the output receiver in certain applications of the invention described in the above-referenced '723 application may be effectively obviated by replacing the controllably blanked isolation switches of the swept output receiver with buffer amplifier—passband filter stages. These buffer-filter stages not only function to provide additional gain to offset the fact that the signal level extracted from the output amplifier is very low, and to prevent producing IMDs in the swept receiver's mixer, but may be implemented of the same bandpass filter in the swept input receiver. This makes the output receiver's bandwidth slightly narrower than the input receiver, and serves to minimize the number of different parts used in the circuit. In both the input and output receivers, the gains of buffer amplifier stages and the losses through the bandpass filters are selected, so as to avoid damaging any other components. Like the architecture of the '723 application, the switchless, swept oscillator configuration of the present invention enables RF power amplifier distortion to be accurately measured, even in the presence of multi-frequency input signals.
- While I have shown and described an embodiment in accordance with the present invention, it is to be understood that the same is not limited thereto but is susceptible to numerous changes and modifications as are known to a person skilled in the art, and I therefore do not wish to be limited to the details shown and described herein, but intend to cover all changes and modifications as are obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art.
Claims (19)
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US09/927,814 US6384681B1 (en) | 2000-01-07 | 2001-08-10 | Swept performance monitor for measuring and correcting RF power amplifier distortion |
Applications Claiming Priority (4)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US47972300A | 2000-01-07 | 2000-01-07 | |
US17527900P | 2000-01-10 | 2000-01-10 | |
US70317600A | 2000-10-31 | 2000-10-31 | |
US09/927,814 US6384681B1 (en) | 2000-01-07 | 2001-08-10 | Swept performance monitor for measuring and correcting RF power amplifier distortion |
Related Parent Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US70317600A Continuation | 2000-01-07 | 2000-10-31 |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
US20020027474A1 true US20020027474A1 (en) | 2002-03-07 |
US6384681B1 US6384681B1 (en) | 2002-05-07 |
Family
ID=27390519
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US09/927,814 Expired - Lifetime US6384681B1 (en) | 2000-01-07 | 2001-08-10 | Swept performance monitor for measuring and correcting RF power amplifier distortion |
Country Status (1)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (1) | US6384681B1 (en) |
Cited By (21)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
WO2004070943A1 (en) * | 2003-02-04 | 2004-08-19 | Siemens Aktiengesellschaft | Method for improving the output power of a non-linear power amplifier |
US20090096683A1 (en) * | 2007-10-10 | 2009-04-16 | Rosenblatt Michael N | Handheld electronic devices with antenna power monitoring |
EP2124332A1 (en) * | 2008-05-22 | 2009-11-25 | Fujitsu Limited | Distortion compensation apparatus and method |
US20090305742A1 (en) * | 2008-06-05 | 2009-12-10 | Ruben Caballero | Electronic device with proximity-based radio power control |
US20110012794A1 (en) * | 2009-07-17 | 2011-01-20 | Schlub Robert W | Electronic devices with parasitic antenna resonating elements that reduce near field radiation |
US20110012793A1 (en) * | 2009-07-17 | 2011-01-20 | Amm David T | Electronic devices with capacitive proximity sensors for proximity-based radio-frequency power control |
US20130296721A1 (en) * | 2009-01-27 | 2013-11-07 | Cardiomems, Inc. | Hypertension System And Method |
US20140036973A1 (en) * | 2012-08-03 | 2014-02-06 | Broadcom Corporation | Calibration for power amplifier predistortion |
US8781420B2 (en) | 2010-04-13 | 2014-07-15 | Apple Inc. | Adjustable wireless circuitry with antenna-based proximity detector |
US20160065147A1 (en) * | 2014-08-28 | 2016-03-03 | Analog Devices Global | Receivers for digital predistortion |
US9300342B2 (en) | 2013-04-18 | 2016-03-29 | Apple Inc. | Wireless device with dynamically adjusted maximum transmit powers |
US9379445B2 (en) | 2014-02-14 | 2016-06-28 | Apple Inc. | Electronic device with satellite navigation system slot antennas |
US9398456B2 (en) | 2014-03-07 | 2016-07-19 | Apple Inc. | Electronic device with accessory-based transmit power control |
US9444425B2 (en) | 2014-06-20 | 2016-09-13 | Apple Inc. | Electronic device with adjustable wireless circuitry |
US9559425B2 (en) | 2014-03-20 | 2017-01-31 | Apple Inc. | Electronic device with slot antenna and proximity sensor |
US9583838B2 (en) | 2014-03-20 | 2017-02-28 | Apple Inc. | Electronic device with indirectly fed slot antennas |
US9728858B2 (en) | 2014-04-24 | 2017-08-08 | Apple Inc. | Electronic devices with hybrid antennas |
US9791490B2 (en) | 2014-06-09 | 2017-10-17 | Apple Inc. | Electronic device having coupler for tapping antenna signals |
US10218052B2 (en) | 2015-05-12 | 2019-02-26 | Apple Inc. | Electronic device with tunable hybrid antennas |
US10290946B2 (en) | 2016-09-23 | 2019-05-14 | Apple Inc. | Hybrid electronic device antennas having parasitic resonating elements |
US10490881B2 (en) | 2016-03-10 | 2019-11-26 | Apple Inc. | Tuning circuits for hybrid electronic device antennas |
Families Citing this family (35)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
GB2359432B (en) * | 2000-02-17 | 2002-07-03 | Wireless Systems Int Ltd | Signal detection |
GB2367633A (en) * | 2000-10-04 | 2002-04-10 | Racal Instruments Ltd | Rf power measurement |
US7095801B1 (en) * | 2001-03-30 | 2006-08-22 | Skyworks Solutions, Inc. | Phase adjustable polyphase filters |
US7027784B2 (en) * | 2001-09-04 | 2006-04-11 | Nokia Corporation | Method and apparatus for detecting power levels of varying envelope signals |
GB2395095A (en) * | 2002-10-30 | 2004-05-12 | Nokia Corp | Reducing noise in a multi-carrier signal |
US7142818B2 (en) * | 2003-02-13 | 2006-11-28 | Honeywell International, Inc. | Systems and methods for reducing radio receiver interference from an on-board avionics transmitter |
US20060227898A1 (en) * | 2003-07-10 | 2006-10-12 | Gibson Timothy P | Radio receiver |
US7126421B2 (en) * | 2003-09-23 | 2006-10-24 | Powerwave Technologies, Inc. | Method for aligning feed forward loops |
US7327803B2 (en) | 2004-10-22 | 2008-02-05 | Parkervision, Inc. | Systems and methods for vector power amplification |
US7355470B2 (en) | 2006-04-24 | 2008-04-08 | Parkervision, Inc. | Systems and methods of RF power transmission, modulation, and amplification, including embodiments for amplifier class transitioning |
US8334722B2 (en) | 2007-06-28 | 2012-12-18 | Parkervision, Inc. | Systems and methods of RF power transmission, modulation and amplification |
US9106316B2 (en) | 2005-10-24 | 2015-08-11 | Parkervision, Inc. | Systems and methods of RF power transmission, modulation, and amplification |
US7911272B2 (en) | 2007-06-19 | 2011-03-22 | Parkervision, Inc. | Systems and methods of RF power transmission, modulation, and amplification, including blended control embodiments |
US8031804B2 (en) | 2006-04-24 | 2011-10-04 | Parkervision, Inc. | Systems and methods of RF tower transmission, modulation, and amplification, including embodiments for compensating for waveform distortion |
US7937106B2 (en) | 2006-04-24 | 2011-05-03 | ParkerVision, Inc, | Systems and methods of RF power transmission, modulation, and amplification, including architectural embodiments of same |
US8315336B2 (en) | 2007-05-18 | 2012-11-20 | Parkervision, Inc. | Systems and methods of RF power transmission, modulation, and amplification, including a switching stage embodiment |
US20080084861A1 (en) * | 2006-10-10 | 2008-04-10 | Honeywell International Inc. | Avionics communication system and method utilizing multi-channel radio technology and a shared data bus |
WO2008156800A1 (en) | 2007-06-19 | 2008-12-24 | Parkervision, Inc. | Combiner-less multiple input single output (miso) amplification with blended control |
US8081933B2 (en) * | 2007-07-13 | 2011-12-20 | Honeywell International Inc. | Reconfigurable aircraft radio communications system |
US8019338B2 (en) * | 2008-05-29 | 2011-09-13 | Honeywell International Inc. | Reconfigurable aircraft communications system with integrated avionics communication router and audio management functions |
US8583033B2 (en) * | 2010-03-05 | 2013-11-12 | Wilson Electronics, Llc | Oscillation protected amplifier with base station overload and noise floor protection |
US8711993B2 (en) | 2010-12-10 | 2014-04-29 | Honeywell International Inc. | Wideband multi-channel receiver with fixed-frequency notch filter for interference rejection |
US8577289B2 (en) | 2011-02-17 | 2013-11-05 | Apple Inc. | Antenna with integrated proximity sensor for proximity-based radio-frequency power control |
EP2695294A1 (en) | 2011-04-08 | 2014-02-12 | Parkervision, Inc. | Systems and methods of rf power transmission, modulation, and amplification |
EP2715867A4 (en) | 2011-06-02 | 2014-12-17 | Parkervision Inc | Antenna control |
US8874029B2 (en) | 2011-08-23 | 2014-10-28 | Wilson Electronics, Llc | Verifying oscillation in amplifiers and the mitigation thereof |
US8639180B2 (en) | 2011-08-23 | 2014-01-28 | Wilson Electronics, Llc | Verifying and mitigating oscillation in amplifiers |
US8874030B2 (en) | 2011-08-23 | 2014-10-28 | Wilson Electronics, Llc | Oscillation detection and oscillation mitigation in amplifiers |
US8583034B2 (en) | 2011-08-23 | 2013-11-12 | Wilson Electronics, Llc | Verifying and mitigating oscillation in amplifiers |
US8849187B2 (en) | 2011-08-23 | 2014-09-30 | Wilson Electronics, Llc | Radio frequency amplifier noise reduction system |
US9093745B2 (en) | 2012-05-10 | 2015-07-28 | Apple Inc. | Antenna and proximity sensor structures having printed circuit and dielectric carrier layers |
CA2814303A1 (en) | 2013-04-26 | 2014-10-26 | Cellphone-Mate, Inc. | Apparatus and methods for radio frequency signal boosters |
CN106415435B (en) | 2013-09-17 | 2020-08-11 | 帕克维辛股份有限公司 | Method, apparatus and system for presenting information bearing time function |
US10673518B2 (en) | 2017-06-27 | 2020-06-02 | Wilson Electronics, Llc | Crossover isolation reduction in a signal booster |
CN108900207B (en) * | 2018-08-29 | 2020-03-13 | 京信通信系统(中国)有限公司 | Power amplifier device, radio frequency signal processing system and base station |
Family Cites Families (9)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US4885551A (en) | 1988-10-31 | 1989-12-05 | American Telephone And Telegraph Company At&T Bell Laboratories | Feed forward linear amplifier |
US5119040A (en) * | 1991-01-04 | 1992-06-02 | Motorola, Inc. | Method and apparatus for optimizing the performance of a power amplifier circuit |
US5489875A (en) | 1994-09-21 | 1996-02-06 | Simon Fraser University | Adaptive feedforward linearizer for RF power amplifiers |
US5565814A (en) * | 1994-12-21 | 1996-10-15 | Nec Corporation | Feedforward amplifier using frequency changeable pilot signal |
US5742201A (en) | 1996-01-30 | 1998-04-21 | Spectrian | Polar envelope correction mechanism for enhancing linearity of RF/microwave power amplifier |
US5923214A (en) | 1997-12-17 | 1999-07-13 | Motorola, Inc. | Feedforward amplifier network with swept pilot tone for reducing distortion generated by a power amplifier |
US5929704A (en) * | 1998-02-20 | 1999-07-27 | Spectrian | Control of RF error extraction using auto-calibrating RF correlator |
US6078216A (en) * | 1998-03-31 | 2000-06-20 | Spectrian Corporation | Aliased wide band performance monitor for adjusting predistortion and vector modulator control parameters of RF amplifier |
US6144255A (en) * | 1998-10-19 | 2000-11-07 | Powerwave Technologies, Inc. | Feedforward amplification system having mask detection compensation |
-
2001
- 2001-08-10 US US09/927,814 patent/US6384681B1/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
Cited By (35)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20060145759A1 (en) * | 2003-02-04 | 2006-07-06 | Otmar Irscheid | Method for improving the output power of a non-linear power amplifier |
US7315208B2 (en) | 2003-02-04 | 2008-01-01 | Siemens Aktiengesellschaft | Method for improving the output power of a non-linear power amplifier |
WO2004070943A1 (en) * | 2003-02-04 | 2004-08-19 | Siemens Aktiengesellschaft | Method for improving the output power of a non-linear power amplifier |
US20090096683A1 (en) * | 2007-10-10 | 2009-04-16 | Rosenblatt Michael N | Handheld electronic devices with antenna power monitoring |
US8892049B2 (en) * | 2007-10-10 | 2014-11-18 | Apple Inc. | Handheld electronic devices with antenna power monitoring |
EP2124332A1 (en) * | 2008-05-22 | 2009-11-25 | Fujitsu Limited | Distortion compensation apparatus and method |
US20090289707A1 (en) * | 2008-05-22 | 2009-11-26 | Fujitsu Limited | Distortion compensation apparatus and method |
US7728665B2 (en) | 2008-05-22 | 2010-06-01 | Fujitsu Limited | Distortion compensation apparatus and method |
US20090305742A1 (en) * | 2008-06-05 | 2009-12-10 | Ruben Caballero | Electronic device with proximity-based radio power control |
US8417296B2 (en) | 2008-06-05 | 2013-04-09 | Apple Inc. | Electronic device with proximity-based radio power control |
US20130296721A1 (en) * | 2009-01-27 | 2013-11-07 | Cardiomems, Inc. | Hypertension System And Method |
US20110012794A1 (en) * | 2009-07-17 | 2011-01-20 | Schlub Robert W | Electronic devices with parasitic antenna resonating elements that reduce near field radiation |
US8432322B2 (en) | 2009-07-17 | 2013-04-30 | Apple Inc. | Electronic devices with capacitive proximity sensors for proximity-based radio-frequency power control |
US8466839B2 (en) | 2009-07-17 | 2013-06-18 | Apple Inc. | Electronic devices with parasitic antenna resonating elements that reduce near field radiation |
US20110012793A1 (en) * | 2009-07-17 | 2011-01-20 | Amm David T | Electronic devices with capacitive proximity sensors for proximity-based radio-frequency power control |
US8947305B2 (en) | 2009-07-17 | 2015-02-03 | Apple Inc. | Electronic devices with capacitive proximity sensors for proximity-based radio-frequency power control |
US9179299B2 (en) | 2010-04-13 | 2015-11-03 | Apple Inc. | Adjustable wireless circuitry with antenna-based proximity detector |
US8781420B2 (en) | 2010-04-13 | 2014-07-15 | Apple Inc. | Adjustable wireless circuitry with antenna-based proximity detector |
US9071336B2 (en) | 2010-04-13 | 2015-06-30 | Apple Inc. | Adjustable wireless circuitry with antenna-based proximity detector |
US9595924B2 (en) * | 2012-08-03 | 2017-03-14 | Broadcom Corporation | Calibration for power amplifier predistortion |
US20140036973A1 (en) * | 2012-08-03 | 2014-02-06 | Broadcom Corporation | Calibration for power amplifier predistortion |
US9300342B2 (en) | 2013-04-18 | 2016-03-29 | Apple Inc. | Wireless device with dynamically adjusted maximum transmit powers |
US9379445B2 (en) | 2014-02-14 | 2016-06-28 | Apple Inc. | Electronic device with satellite navigation system slot antennas |
US9398456B2 (en) | 2014-03-07 | 2016-07-19 | Apple Inc. | Electronic device with accessory-based transmit power control |
US9583838B2 (en) | 2014-03-20 | 2017-02-28 | Apple Inc. | Electronic device with indirectly fed slot antennas |
US9559425B2 (en) | 2014-03-20 | 2017-01-31 | Apple Inc. | Electronic device with slot antenna and proximity sensor |
US9728858B2 (en) | 2014-04-24 | 2017-08-08 | Apple Inc. | Electronic devices with hybrid antennas |
US9791490B2 (en) | 2014-06-09 | 2017-10-17 | Apple Inc. | Electronic device having coupler for tapping antenna signals |
US10571502B2 (en) | 2014-06-09 | 2020-02-25 | Apple Inc. | Electronic device having coupler for tapping antenna signals |
US9444425B2 (en) | 2014-06-20 | 2016-09-13 | Apple Inc. | Electronic device with adjustable wireless circuitry |
US20160065147A1 (en) * | 2014-08-28 | 2016-03-03 | Analog Devices Global | Receivers for digital predistortion |
US9735741B2 (en) * | 2014-08-28 | 2017-08-15 | Analog Devices Global | Receivers for digital predistortion |
US10218052B2 (en) | 2015-05-12 | 2019-02-26 | Apple Inc. | Electronic device with tunable hybrid antennas |
US10490881B2 (en) | 2016-03-10 | 2019-11-26 | Apple Inc. | Tuning circuits for hybrid electronic device antennas |
US10290946B2 (en) | 2016-09-23 | 2019-05-14 | Apple Inc. | Hybrid electronic device antennas having parasitic resonating elements |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
US6384681B1 (en) | 2002-05-07 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US6384681B1 (en) | Swept performance monitor for measuring and correcting RF power amplifier distortion | |
US6407635B2 (en) | Carrier-blanking mechanism for sweeping detector used to measure and correct RF power amplifier distortion | |
US6359508B1 (en) | Distortion detection apparatus for controlling predistortion, carrier cancellation and feed-forward cancellation in linear RF power amplifiers | |
US20040021517A1 (en) | Power minimization, correlation-based closed loop for controlling predistorter and vector modulator feeding RF power amplifier | |
USRE37407E1 (en) | Polar envelope correction mechanism for enhancing linearity of RF/microwave power amplifier | |
EP1158661B1 (en) | Feed-forward amplifier | |
US6972622B2 (en) | Optimization of error loops in distributed power amplifiers | |
EP1262017B1 (en) | Spectral distortion monitor for controlling pre-distortion and feed-forward linearization of rf power amplifier | |
US7092683B2 (en) | Transmission circuit | |
WO1996003804A1 (en) | Ultra-linear feedforward amplifier with adaptive control and method for adaptive control | |
WO1991007817A1 (en) | Rf wideband high power amplifier | |
KR20010006290A (en) | Error extraction using autocalibrating rf correlator | |
WO1996030997A1 (en) | Feed forward rf amplifier | |
US6784731B2 (en) | System and method for reducing amplifier distortion using distortion feedback | |
KR100326313B1 (en) | Combine linear amplifier and method | |
US6504878B1 (en) | Digitally modulated RF amplifier system having improved adjacent sideband distortion reduction | |
KR20020034830A (en) | Swept performance monitor for measuring and correcting rf power amplifier distortion | |
US6593808B2 (en) | Set-up method for a linearizing circuit | |
MAHMOUD et al. | Small signal gain degradation and its correction by feedforward linearization | |
Mann et al. | A flexible test-bed for developing hybrid linear transmitter architectures | |
KR20000050041A (en) | The plan method of a predistorter | |
KR19980069489A (en) | Synthetic Linear Amplifier and Method |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
STCF | Information on status: patent grant |
Free format text: PATENTED CASE |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: REMEC, INC., CALIFORNIA Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:SPECTRIAN CORPORATION;REEL/FRAME:013949/0866 Effective date: 20030324 |
|
FPAY | Fee payment |
Year of fee payment: 4 |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: POWERWAVE TECHNOLOGIES, INC., CALIFORNIA Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:REMEC, INC.;REEL/FRAME:017823/0684 Effective date: 20051004 |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: SPECTRIAN CORPORATION, CALIFORNIA Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:BONDS, DAVID KENT;REEL/FRAME:019805/0634 Effective date: 20001003 |
|
FEPP | Fee payment procedure |
Free format text: PAYOR NUMBER ASSIGNED (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: ASPN); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITY |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: WELLS FARGO FOOTHILL, LLC, AS AGENT, CALIFORNIA Free format text: PATENT SECURITY AGREEMENT;ASSIGNOR:POWERWAVE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.;REEL/FRAME:022507/0027 Effective date: 20090403 Owner name: WELLS FARGO FOOTHILL, LLC, AS AGENT,CALIFORNIA Free format text: PATENT SECURITY AGREEMENT;ASSIGNOR:POWERWAVE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.;REEL/FRAME:022507/0027 Effective date: 20090403 |
|
FPAY | Fee payment |
Year of fee payment: 8 |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: POWERWAVE TECHNOLOGIES, INC., CALIFORNIA Free format text: RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY;ASSIGNOR:WELLS FARGO CAPITAL FINANCE, LLC, FKA WELLS FARGO FOOTHILL, LLC;REEL/FRAME:028819/0014 Effective date: 20120820 |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: P-WAVE HOLDINGS, LLC, CALIFORNIA Free format text: SECURITY AGREEMENT;ASSIGNOR:POWERWAVE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.;REEL/FRAME:028939/0381 Effective date: 20120911 |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: P-WAVE HOLDINGS, LLC, CALIFORNIA Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:POWERWAVE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.;REEL/FRAME:031718/0801 Effective date: 20130522 |
|
REMI | Maintenance fee reminder mailed | ||
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: POWERWAVE TECHNOLOGIES S.A.R.L., LUXEMBOURG Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:P-WAVE HOLDINGS, LLC;REEL/FRAME:032364/0916 Effective date: 20140220 |
|
FPAY | Fee payment |
Year of fee payment: 12 |
|
SULP | Surcharge for late payment |
Year of fee payment: 11 |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: INTEL CORPORATION, CALIFORNIA Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:POWERWAVE TECHNOLOGIES S.A.R.L.;REEL/FRAME:034216/0001 Effective date: 20140827 |
|
FEPP | Fee payment procedure |
Free format text: PAYER NUMBER DE-ASSIGNED (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: RMPN); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITY Free format text: PAYOR NUMBER ASSIGNED (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: ASPN); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITY |