|Numéro de publication||US20030053636 A1|
|Type de publication||Demande|
|Numéro de demande||US 10/251,479|
|Date de publication||20 mars 2003|
|Date de dépôt||19 sept. 2002|
|Date de priorité||20 sept. 2001|
|Autre référence de publication||DE60204333D1, DE60204333T2, DE60223156D1, DE60223156T2, DE60238127D1, EP1427995A2, EP1428036A2, EP1428207A1, EP1428207B1, EP1428234A1, EP1428234B1, EP1428330A2, EP1428330B1, EP1428354A2, US6659392, US6801158, US6950036, US7245909, US20030052220, US20030052800, US20030052816, US20030054817, US20030055519, WO2003025508A2, WO2003025508A3, WO2003025617A2, WO2003025617A3, WO2003025905A1, WO2003025962A1, WO2003026162A2, WO2003026162A3, WO2003026174A2, WO2003026174A3|
|Numéro de publication||10251479, 251479, US 2003/0053636 A1, US 2003/053636 A1, US 20030053636 A1, US 20030053636A1, US 2003053636 A1, US 2003053636A1, US-A1-20030053636, US-A1-2003053636, US2003/0053636A1, US2003/053636A1, US20030053636 A1, US20030053636A1, US2003053636 A1, US2003053636A1|
|Inventeurs||Mark Goldberg, Ken Snodgrass|
|Cessionnaire d'origine||Goldberg Mark L., Snodgrass Ken L.|
|Exporter la citation||BiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan|
|Citations de brevets (5), Référencé par (14), Classifications (58), Événements juridiques (1)|
|Liens externes: USPTO, Cession USPTO, Espacenet|
 This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 60/324,035, filed Sep. 20, 2001.
 1. Technical Field
 The present invention relates generally to the field of speech signal processing and more particularly to a noise filtering system for use in a communications system.
 2. Background Art
 In certain types of vehicles, such as submarines and aircraft, clear communications between the members of the crew is considered desirable for proper operation of the vehicle. In many onboard voice communication systems, the communications between various crewmembers is typically accomplished through the use of an onboard electronic intercom system. The typical onboard electronic intercom system will generally include headphones and microphones and will allow for communications between the primary vehicle operators as well as crewmembers located in other parts of the vehicle.
 In operation, the typical microphone receives both voice signals and various “noise” signals. Noise signals can be generally characterized as undesired audio signals that tend to mask or distort the desired audio signals. In general, noise may be introduced into the communication system by various sources including the ambient operational environment of the vehicle, sources external to the vehicle, and by the operational components of the communication system itself. Regardless of the source, noise is generally manifest as spurious audio signals in the voice communication system. Accordingly, users of the electronic communications system will hear both the desired voice signal and, in many intercom-type communication systems, various noise signals.
 As can be appreciated, the introduction of noise into the communications system is considered undesirable. Noise tends to inhibit clear communications and may cause miscommunication of important information that could be detrimental to the desired operation of the vehicle. Additionally, noise mixed with the speech signal tends to mask or distort the speech signal and, in certain situations, may render the voice signal entirely unintelligible. Finally, the continued exposure to noise in the communications system can cause unnecessary strain on the crew as they try to decipher the voice signal, thereby increasing operator fatigue.
 In an effort to mitigate the undesirable effects of noise in the communications system, some conventional intercom communication systems have adopted a compression scheme in order to reduce the noise introduced by the communications system itself. In a typical compressed signal system, mixed noise and voice signals are compressed at the transmitting end and then expanded at the receiving end of the system. These systems are typically implemented to reduce only the noise introduced in the transmission channel of the communication system itself, between the microphone and the headphone. Accordingly, any ambient acoustic noise picked up by the microphone tends to remain unchanged in these systems.
 Other types of communication systems attempt to cancel noise by measuring the ambient noise in the vicinity of the microphone. Then, various filters may be employed to subtract the “measured” noise from the combined voice and noise signal. While somewhat effective, these systems generally require two microphones, the first microphone being used to pick up the combined voice and noise signal while the second microphone attempts to pick up only the ambient noise. The requirement for a second microphone adds cost and complexity to the intercom system and may not substantially enhance performance because the ambient noise in the vicinity of the second microphone may not accurately represent the ambient noise in the vicinity of the first microphone.
 In view of the foregoing, it should be appreciated that it would be desirable to provide methods and apparatus for minimizing the undesirable noise in a vehicle's communication system without substantially increasing the cost and complexity of the communication system. Furthermore, additional desirable features will become apparent to one skilled in the art from the foregoing background of the invention and following detailed description of a preferred exemplary embodiment and appended claims.
 The present invention includes a processor configured to receive at least one operating parameter from an operating parameter input and, based on the operating parameter, configure at least one filter to filter a signal.
 The preferred exemplary embodiment of the present invention will hereinafter be described in conjunction with the appended drawings, where like designations denote like elements, and:
FIG. 1 is a schematic block diagram of an apparatus for filtering vehicle noise sources in accordance with a preferred exemplary embodiment of the present invention;
FIG. 2 is a frequency diagram of a voice signal and various noise signals; and
FIG. 3 is a flow diagram for filtering vehicle noise sources in accordance with a preferred exemplary embodiment of the present invention.
 In the most preferred embodiments of the present invention, a series of digital filters are “tuned” to the frequency of the ambient noises of the vehicle environment and can be adjusted as the ambient noise changes.
 Referring now to FIG. 1, a noise filtering apparatus 100 comprises a plurality of digital filters 120, 130 and 140, and a processor 150. Processor 150 is configured to receive at least one operating parameter associated with the operation of the vehicle containing noise filtering apparatus 100 via operating parameter input 190. An operating parameter may be any type of information relative to the operation of the vehicle containing noise-filtering apparatus 100. This would include information about the operational environment as well as the various devices used in conjunction with the operation of the vehicle.
 Digital filters 120, 130 and 140 are each configured to receive and process an audio signal 106 received from an audio source 105. Each digital filter 120, 130 and 140 is connected to processor 150 and is configured with a center frequency input 122, 132, and 142 respectively. Additionally, each digital filter 120, 130 and 140 is configured with a filter bandwidth input 124, 134, or 144 respectively. Processor 150 can selectively adjust the center frequency of each of digital filters 120, 130, and 140. Similarly, processor 150 can selectively adjust the bandwidth for each digital filter 120, 130, and 140. This ability to adjust filters 120, 130, and 140 allows for the deployment of a relatively robust and flexible noise filtering apparatus 100.
 Additionally, as shown in FIG. 1, an audio source 105 is coupled to noise filtering apparatus 100 and provides an audio signal 106 via an analog to digital (A/D) converter 110. Similarly, a digital to analog (D/A) converter 160 is coupled to an output signal connector 155 and is provided to convert the digital output signal from noise filtering apparatus 100 to an analog signal, suitable for use with loudspeaker 170 and/or transmitter 180. Other types of output devices, including other headsets or additional signal processing devices, may be employed in various other embodiments of the present invention as well.
 Processor 150 is most preferably configurable to adaptively respond to variations in the noise frequencies associated with the operation of the vehicle. By using operating parameter input 190, information relative to the operating environment of the vehicle can be used to adjust the center frequency for filters 120, 130 and 140. For example, as the revolutions-per-minute (RPM) of a helicopter rotor increase or decrease, the center frequencies of the noise signal associated with the rotor tend to shift. If the information relative to the helicopter rotor RPM is transmitted to processor 150 via operating parameter input 190, then processor 150 can selectively adjust the center frequency of one or more of filters 120, 130 and/or 140 to adaptively reconfigure filters 120, 130, and/or 140, thereby more effectively filtering the helicopter rotor noise signal over a broader operating range.
 Additionally, the bandwidth of each of filters 120, 130 and 140 may be selectively adjusted by processor 150, based on the operating environment as determined in conjunction with input received from operating parameter input 190. For certain noise sources, the bandwidth of a given filter 120, 130 or 140 may be narrowed while it may be desirable to broaden the bandwidth of another filter to reduce or eliminate the noise associated with a different noise source. In general, to preserve the integrity of the voice signal to the extent possible, the bandwidth of filters 120, 130 and 140 will be kept as narrow as practical for a given noise source. This reconfiguration capability thereby allows noise-filtering apparatus 100 to be configured for a variety of noise frequencies without requiring a separate noise filter for each possible noise source or multiple filters for a single noise source with a changing center frequency. In the most preferred embodiments of the present invention, the audio signal is filtered prior to compression and/or transmission to any output device such as loudspeaker 170 and/or transmitter 180. This means that in the most preferred embodiments of the present invention, signal filtering is performed on the input side of noise filtering apparatus 100.
 While the most preferred embodiments of the present invention use a series of filters that are adaptively reconfigurable by processor 150, other embodiments may rely on a series of non-reconfigurable filters specifically tuned to filter one or more pre-determined noise sources, at a pre-determined frequency and/or bandwidth. In those embodiments, processor 150 would simply select one or more filters from the population of available filters, depending on the noise source and the operational environment of the vehicle as determined in conjunction with input received from operating parameter input 190.
 In this particular exemplary embodiment, audio source 105 is depicted as the boom microphone of a standard aviator's headset, typical of the type used by a pilot or crewmember in an aircraft. However, it should be noted that this depiction is merely representative in nature and other audio sources may be configured for use with the present invention as well. Additionally, in certain applications, it is anticipated that audio signal 106 may be a digital signal, obviating the need for A/D converter 110. Similarly, the signal provided at output signal connector 155 may not need to be converted to an analog signal in certain applications. Finally, those skilled in the art will recognize that the conversion of an input or an output signal may be accomplished by many means and all such conversions, if required, are considered to be within the scope of the present invention.
 It should also be noted that although the number of digital filters depicted in FIG. 1 is three, the exact number of digital filters used in noise filtering apparatus 100 is largely a design consideration and will be determined by the specific application, based on parameters such as the number and type of noise sources. Similarly, although a single operating parameter input 190 is shown, those skilled in the art will recognize that, if necessary or desired for a specific application, additional operating parameter inputs may be included in noise filtering apparatus 100 without departing from the overall spirit and scope of the present invention.
 Referring now to FIG. 2, a frequency diagram 200 for a voice signal 250 combined with a plurality of noise frequencies (f1, f2, and f3) with each frequency having a center frequency 220, 230 or 240. Frequency diagram 200 illustrates the interaction of the noise signals with voice signal 250 and each noise frequency shown in FIG. 2 can be attributed to a specific noise source associated with the operational environment of a vehicle such as an airplane or helicopter. Voice signal 250 can contain noise attributable to the operation of the vehicle and, as shown in FIG. 2, the noise frequencies will generally be identifiable within multiple frequency bands. As shown in FIG. 2, each typical noise frequency has a relatively narrow bandwidth. Accordingly, these frequencies can be identified/characterized and a filter can be appropriately configured with a suitable bandwidth to mask the noise signal at that specific frequency.
 Referring now to FIG. 3, a method 300 for implementing a noise filtering apparatus in accordance with a preferred exemplary embodiment of the present invention is shown. As shown in FIG. 3, a frequency spectrum analysis of a given vehicle is conducted (step 310) to identify various noise sources and related noise frequencies associated with the operating environment of the vehicle. This analysis will also characterize the noise frequencies and the associated bandwidths of these frequencies for the various operating modes of the vehicle (step 320). The noise sources may include things such as electrical devices, machinery, mechanical sub-systems and the like.
 Next, appropriate filters for the identified frequencies will be selected (step 330). These filters will be specifically configurable for the noise frequencies identified in the spectrum analysis and characterization steps of method 300. After the filters have been selected, the processor that will control the filters will be configured with information about each of the filters, including identifying an initial center frequency input and a filter bandwidth input for each of the filters. This will allow the processor to control the bandwidth of each filter and selectively activate or deactivate the appropriate filter or filters, depending on the specific noise frequency as determined by the operating parameter or parameters.
 Finally, in typical operation, the processor will receive at least one operating parameter (step 350) and will adjust the center frequency of at least one of the filters to reduce or eliminate the noise signal associated with that operating parameter (step 360) or adjust the bandwidth (step 370) of one or more filters, if necessary. Steps 360 and 370 are optional steps that will be used as necessary, depending on the type of noise signal being filtered and the type of filtering being performed. The center frequency adjustment will allow various noises to be filtered based on changes in the operating environment and changes in the bandwidth will allow for the specific filtering of isolated noises, as desired. It should be noted that steps 350, 360 and/or 370 may be repeated for any number of operating parameters and/or for any number of changes in any given operating parameter or parameters. In this manner, it is possible to configure the noise filtering apparatus for a multitude of different noise signals generated by a number of different operating environments.
 From the foregoing description, it should be appreciated that methods and apparatus are provided for a vehicle noise filtering system. While certain preferred exemplary embodiments have been presented in the foregoing detailed description of the preferred exemplary embodiments, it should be appreciated that a vast number of variations in the embodiments exist. For example, although the various preferred exemplary embodiments of the present invention have been described in the context of a communications system for an aircraft, the apparatus and methods of the present invention are equally applicable to communication systems in other vehicles such as submarines, spacecraft, and the like.
 It should also be appreciated that the preferred exemplary embodiments are only examples, and are not intended to limit the scope, applicability, or configuration of the invention in any way. Rather, the foregoing detailed description provides those skilled in the art with a convenient road map for implementing the preferred exemplary embodiments of the invention. It should also be understood that various changes may be made in the function and arrangement of elements described in the preferred exemplary embodiments without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention as set forth in the appended claims.
|Brevet cité||Date de dépôt||Date de publication||Déposant||Titre|
|US2151733||4 mai 1936||28 mars 1939||American Box Board Co||Container|
|CH283612A *||Titre non disponible|
|FR1392029A *||Titre non disponible|
|FR2166276A1 *||Titre non disponible|
|GB533718A||Titre non disponible|
|Brevet citant||Date de dépôt||Date de publication||Déposant||Titre|
|US7162420 *||10 déc. 2002||9 janv. 2007||Liberato Technologies, Llc||System and method for noise reduction having first and second adaptive filters|
|US8073150 *||28 avr. 2009||6 déc. 2011||Bose Corporation||Dynamically configurable ANR signal processing topology|
|US8073151 *||28 avr. 2009||6 déc. 2011||Bose Corporation||Dynamically configurable ANR filter block topology|
|US8085946 *||28 avr. 2009||27 déc. 2011||Bose Corporation||ANR analysis side-chain data support|
|US8090114 *||31 mars 2010||3 janv. 2012||Bose Corporation||Convertible filter|
|US8165313 *||28 avr. 2009||24 avr. 2012||Bose Corporation||ANR settings triple-buffering|
|US8184822 *||28 avr. 2009||22 mai 2012||Bose Corporation||ANR signal processing topology|
|US8315405||30 mars 2010||20 nov. 2012||Bose Corporation||Coordinated ANR reference sound compression|
|US8345888||30 mars 2010||1 janv. 2013||Bose Corporation||Digital high frequency phase compensation|
|US8355513||14 déc. 2011||15 janv. 2013||Burge Benjamin D||Convertible filter|
|US8472637||25 avr. 2010||25 juin 2013||Bose Corporation||Variable ANR transform compression|
|US8532310||25 avr. 2010||10 sept. 2013||Bose Corporation||Frequency-dependent ANR reference sound compression|
|US8611553||25 avr. 2010||17 déc. 2013||Bose Corporation||ANR instability detection|
|US20040111258 *||10 déc. 2002||10 juin 2004||Zangi Kambiz C.||Method and apparatus for noise reduction|
|Classification aux États-Unis||381/71.11|
|Classification internationale||H04B7/185, H04L12/56, H04L12/40, G08G5/02, B64D45/04, G01S19/40, G01S19/48, G01S19/35, G01S19/20, G01S19/15, G01S5/14, G01S19/07, G01S11/02, G01S19/13, H04R3/00, H04L12/28, H04L29/06, H04L29/08|
|Classification coopérative||H04L69/329, H04L67/12, G01S5/0284, H04L29/06, G01S19/51, H04L2012/4028, H04L12/40032, H04L12/413, G08G5/0013, H04B7/18508, G01S11/02, G08G5/0008, H04R3/00, G01S19/07, G08G5/025, H04B7/18506, H01H2217/022, H04L12/40019, G08G5/0021, G01S19/15, G01S19/13|
|Classification européenne||H04B7/185B4B, G01S19/07, G08G5/00A2, G08G5/00B2, G01S19/51, G01S11/02, G08G5/00A4, G01S19/15, H04L12/40A2, H04L12/413, G01S5/02R, H04L12/40A4, H04B7/185B4, G01S19/13, G08G5/02E, H04R3/00, H04L29/08N11, H04L29/06|
|19 sept. 2002||AS||Assignment|
Owner name: HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC, NEW JERSEY
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:GOLDBERG, MARK L.;SNODGRASS, KEN L.;REEL/FRAME:013317/0685
Effective date: 20020917