US20030097294A1 - System and method for analyzing data - Google Patents
System and method for analyzing data Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- US20030097294A1 US20030097294A1 US10/154,427 US15442702A US2003097294A1 US 20030097294 A1 US20030097294 A1 US 20030097294A1 US 15442702 A US15442702 A US 15442702A US 2003097294 A1 US2003097294 A1 US 2003097294A1
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- complexity
- information
- information unit
- data
- unit
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Abandoned
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q40/00—Finance; Insurance; Tax strategies; Processing of corporate or income taxes
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F16/00—Information retrieval; Database structures therefor; File system structures therefor
- G06F16/30—Information retrieval; Database structures therefor; File system structures therefor of unstructured textual data
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q30/00—Commerce
- G06Q30/02—Marketing; Price estimation or determination; Fundraising
- G06Q30/0201—Market modelling; Market analysis; Collecting market data
Definitions
- the present invention generally relates to a system and method for detecting and analyzing of information units. More specifically, the present invention relates to the detection and analysis of data records by selecting particular aspects of the data record.
- the neural network model “learns” a pattern that it can later identify.
- the learning process is based on a given number of iterations executed by the neural network based detection system.
- the ability of a fraudulent detection system based upon a neural network system is substantially limited and all too often provides false diagnosis of transactions as fraudulent.
- the principal reason for providing false diagnosis is related to the manner in which the neural networks method operates.
- the neural network method ability within a fraudulent detection system is limited as it learns the pattern of a single customer, credit card holder, or a group of customers, and their fraudulent behavior pattern and produces a score based on the “learned” patterns. Consequently, the neural network provides a large amount of false recognitions, such as identifying not fraudulent credit card transactions as fraudulent.
- the limitations of the neural networks are due to their disability to deal with “trouble making” customers who have an erratic behavior pattern and do not have a simple pattern.
- the present invention relates to a computing environment accommodating at least one input device connectable to at least one server device connectable to at least one output device, a method of processing at least one information unit introduced by the at least one input device by the at least one server device to create at least one information score based on the at least one information unit, the method comprising the steps of: creating at least one complexity catalog based on the at least one information unit, and establishing at least one score unit based on the at least one complexity catalog, and establishing scores for assessment.
- the method above mentioned further comprising the steps of: obtaining at least one information unit from the at least one input device by the at least one server device, and displaying the at least one scoring unit.
- the information unit processed within the present invention can include data about an individual behavior such as a customer or a group of customers.
- the present invention computing environment accommodating at least one input device connected to at least one server device having at least one output device, a system for the processing at least one information unit introduced via the at least one input device by the at least one server device to process at least one information unit based, the system comprising the elements of: an infrastructure server device to create at least one complexity catalog, and a complexity catalog to hold at least one list of ordered complexity values associated with the partitioned sub-unit blocks, and an application server to build at least one information summary unit based on the at least one information unit and on at least one associated complexity catalog, and a scoring component to provide scores.
- FIG. 1 is a schematic block diagram of a system environment of the preferred embodiment of the present invention.
- FIG. 2 is a schematic block diagram of the information detection and analysis system of the preferred embodiment of the present invention.
- the present invention provides a method and system for analysis of data (SAD) by executing complexity calculations of a set of data fields, enabling segmentation of data, providing scores to the separated segmentations and providing final score of clusters of the analyzed segmentations of data.
- SAD can be used in a variety of applications such as customer retention, marketing, analysis of credit card transaction and the like.
- the SAD aids a businesses enterprise in customer retention.
- customer retention systems mostly include analysis of performance measures, such as quantitative metrics and formulas, for detecting potential performance problems.
- the measures used include amongst others: retention rate, loyalty index and satisfaction index.
- the customer retention method and system proposed by the preferred embodiment of the present invention includes a complexity calculation tool that attacks the customer retention problem from a different, yet complimentary angle. It gives a numerical parameter to the complexity of the pattern, i.e., whether it is simple and monotonic or erratic and unpredictable, and alerts whenever this parameter changes, e.g. when a transaction of a simple behaving account deviates from its monotonic behavior, or when a monotonic and recurring transactions appear in an erratic account.
- the customer retention system and method proposed by the preferred embodiment of the present invention provides an end result with a final score. The final score provides analysis that indicates whether a specific customer is about to be lost to the business.
- the new addition to the prior art in business intelligence is divided into two major components: a parameterization of the data by calculating the complexity of a given record, and an analysis method of data records by calculating the complexity of one or more dimensions of the data in a subject oriented way.
- the parameterization of data enables to attach meaning to a parameter (e.g. high complexity value means an erratic behavior and an unstable customer, low complexity value means a monotonic behavior and a stable customer). Segmentation of data according to a parameter, a better classification can be made (e.g. all the high complexity customers are grouped together in an “erratic behavior group”, while the low complexity customers are in the “monotonic group”).
- the records are classified according to their behavior and not according to a predetermined property (e.g.
- the analysis method of data records by calculating the complexity of the data in a subject oriented way enables the selection of the fields of interest and the calculation of the other fields' complexity, thus showing the behavior of the selected fields.
- the Customer field can be selected and the complexity of the “Time of Call”, “Length of Call” and “Transaction Made” fields can be calculated, thereby analyzing the behavior of all the customers is accomplished.
- This innovative analysis method will show whether they always make the same transaction in a short call (low complexity) or call in different times of the day, making all kinds of transaction (high complexity).
- the analysis provided by the present invention provides the possibility to detect changes of patterns within specific field or combination thereof within an information unit. Thus, as the preferred embodiment is within the field of customer retention, the behavior or a change of behavior of a customer or group of customers over the time axis can be detected.
- this analysis can alert when an agent has deviated from his normal behavior (i.e. when his complexity has changed from previous complexity calculations).
- the supervisor can be alerted that the specific agent has changed his behavior.
- the new analysis method can detect a change in behavior and generate an alert concerning the change.
- the SAD 18 receives data input from users 10 , 12 , and 14 via the data communication network 20 (DCN).
- Users 10 , 12 and 14 can be individuals forwarding information units regarding particular customers, businesses forwarding information regarding of all their customers behavior or a transmitting center or agent transmitting information regarding customers behavior from one or more locations.
- the DCN 20 can be the Internet, LAN, WAN, a satellite communication network and the like.
- the most common DCN 20 used is the standard telephone system (POTS) that enables communication via ordinary phone connection lines.
- POTS standard telephone system
- the SAD 18 includes an input device 56 , a communication device 54 , an output device 58 and an analysis and evaluation server platform 22 .
- the input device 56 can be a pointing device, a keyboard device or the like.
- the output device 58 can be a printer, a screen display or the like.
- the communication device 54 can be a modem, a network interface card or any other suitable communication devices providing transmission and reception of data via DCN 20 of FIG. 1.
- the analysis and evaluation server platform 22 includes a processor device 24 , and a memory device 26 .
- the processor device 24 is the logic unit designed to perform arithmetic and logic operations by responding to and processing the basic instructions driving the computing device.
- the processor device 24 can be one of the Intel Pentium series, the PowerPC series, the K6 series, the Celeron, the Athlon, the Duron, the Alpha, or the like.
- the memory device 26 includes a reference transaction database 28 , an operating system 30 , a control database 32 , a complexity database catalog 36 and an application server 38 .
- the reference transaction database 28 includes database information including a list of customers, personal information regarding customers, history files containing customer behavior and other relevant information related to credit card holders and agents.
- the reference transaction database 28 can be located within the SAD 18 as illustrated in FIG. 2 or in any other separate location.
- the operating system 30 is responsible for managing the operation of the entire set of software programs implemented in the operation of the SAD 18 .
- the operating system 30 can be of any known operating system such as Windows NT, Windows XP, UNIX, Linux, VMS, OS/400, AIX, OS X and the like.
- the complexity database catalog 36 includes all the complexity values assigned to the records processed by the complexity engine 52 . The complexity values stored within the complexity database catalog 36 are discussed in detail in the pending PCT application PCT/IL01/01074 incorporated herein by reference.
- the control database 32 controls the input data received by the input device 56 and the transfer thereof to the application server 38 .
- the control database 32 also directs the movement of the data from the reference transaction database 28 to the application server 38 and to the complexity database catalog 36 from the application server 38 .
- the application server 38 within the preferred embodiment includes a complexity catalog handler 40 , a scoring component 42 , a learning component 44 , a database handler 46 , a resource allocation component 48 , a user interface component 50 and a complexity engine 52 .
- the complexity catalog handler 40 is responsible for the obtaining the appropriate complexity metrics records created by the application server 38 from the complexity database catalog 36 .
- the resource allocation component 48 is responsible for allocating variable resources to the processing of the separate records in accordance with the complexity metrics thereof.
- the user interface component 50 is a set of specifically designed and developed front-end programs. The component 50 allows the user of the system to interact dynamically with the system by performing a set of predefined procedures operative to the running of the method.
- the user could select an application, as selected for the SAD customer retention purposes, activate the selected application, adjust specific processing parameters, select sets of records for processing according to the complexity metrics thereof, and the like.
- the component 50 could be developed as a plug-in to any of the known user interfaces.
- the component 50 will be preferably a Graphical User Interface (GUI) but any other manner of interfacing with the user could be used such as a command-driven interface, a menu-driven interface or the like.
- GUI Graphical User Interface
- the database handler 46 receives the input data records from the control database 32 and provides the records to the complexity catalog handler 40 .
- the database handler 46 further receives complexity values and scores provided to data records from the complexity catalog handler 40 and provides the control database 32 that provides the complexity database catalog 36 and reference transaction database 28 with the complexity values and scores regarding to data records.
- the learning component 44 provides mechanism for matching a given input such as the complexity vectors for each transaction to a given output such as a customer behavior or deviation of ordinary customer behavior.
- the learning component 44 provides the scoring component 42 with different scores that are than processed within the scoring component 42 .
- the complexity engine 52 provides complexity values to data records received from the control database 32 within the application server 38 and handled by the database handler 46 .
Abstract
The present invention provides a method and system for analyzing data that characterizing incoming data. The incoming data is analyzed and processed to provide scores. The received scores are further processed to provide a final score by processing the incoming data record with internal databases catalog to provide a final score that is a final diagnosis of the method and system of the present invention. In a preferred embodiment of the present invention the incoming data are information units regarding customer behavior that are analyzed to characterize customers for retention purposes.
Description
- This application claims priority from PCT Application No. PCT/IL01/01074, filed Nov. 21, 2001, and Israeli Patent Application No. 146597, filed Nov. 20, 2001, each of which is hereby incorporated by reference as if fully set forth herein.
- The present invention generally relates to a system and method for detecting and analyzing of information units. More specifically, the present invention relates to the detection and analysis of data records by selecting particular aspects of the data record.
- Computerized systematic data analysis of information units is performed today mainly by using decision trees. Decision trees within the computerized systems utilize specifically designated data stored in system databases to categorize information units received as input data. The specifically designated data used for categorizing the information units is based on assumptions such as statistics or specific requirements of the system. One example of utilizing such systems is the analysis performed for fraud detection in credit card transactions. The fraud detection analysis system can detect anomalous transactions according to designated data. A transaction associated with the performance of a purchase for a sum that exceeds substantially from the “normal” designated sum will generate an alert, a warning or provide suitable instructions to supervising routines of the system or to a specific user. Nevertheless, the designated stored control data utilized for the generation of the indication for fraudulent transactions has limitations. The source of the limitations of designated data is the inaccuracy that derives from the inherent nature of such data, that attempts to predict the future with knowledge gained in the past, and from difficulty to characterize a credit card holder's “normal” behavior. The difficulty to characterize a credit card holder's behavior originates with a wide variety of factors that influence a person's behavior, such as religion, seasons of the year, family status, ethnic origin, and the like. Other difficulty for providing accurate information regards credit card holders that do not have a simple pattern of transaction performance. U.S. Pat. No. 5,819,226 discloses a prior art system known in the field of fraudulent behavior detection. The patent provides an automated system and method for detecting fraudulent transactions using the neural network method as a predictive model. The neural network model “learns” a pattern that it can later identify. The learning process is based on a given number of iterations executed by the neural network based detection system. However, the ability of a fraudulent detection system based upon a neural network system is substantially limited and all too often provides false diagnosis of transactions as fraudulent. The principal reason for providing false diagnosis is related to the manner in which the neural networks method operates. The neural network method ability within a fraudulent detection system is limited as it learns the pattern of a single customer, credit card holder, or a group of customers, and their fraudulent behavior pattern and produces a score based on the “learned” patterns. Consequently, the neural network provides a large amount of false recognitions, such as identifying not fraudulent credit card transactions as fraudulent. The limitations of the neural networks are due to their disability to deal with “trouble making” customers who have an erratic behavior pattern and do not have a simple pattern.
- Therefore, there is an urgent need to introduce a method and system that will provide accurate information regarding the input information units. There is also an urgent need for improved customer retention applications. The importance of customer retention applications within modern commerce is considerable. Business executives as well as commercial retail outlet owners are keenly aware that in order to retain their customers a substantially automatic learning process must be performed. There is a need for a method and system that will provide useful information received into a system that is operative in the processing and analyzing customer behavior and will provide the characteristics of customers concerning their dealings with the specific businesses. The system and method proposed by the present invention provides information related to customers behavior by analyzing concurrently various fields within information units containing diverse types of data.
- The present invention relates to a computing environment accommodating at least one input device connectable to at least one server device connectable to at least one output device, a method of processing at least one information unit introduced by the at least one input device by the at least one server device to create at least one information score based on the at least one information unit, the method comprising the steps of: creating at least one complexity catalog based on the at least one information unit, and establishing at least one score unit based on the at least one complexity catalog, and establishing scores for assessment.
- The method above mentioned further comprising the steps of: obtaining at least one information unit from the at least one input device by the at least one server device, and displaying the at least one scoring unit. The information unit processed within the present invention can include data about an individual behavior such as a customer or a group of customers.
- The present invention computing environment accommodating at least one input device connected to at least one server device having at least one output device, a system for the processing at least one information unit introduced via the at least one input device by the at least one server device to process at least one information unit based, the system comprising the elements of: an infrastructure server device to create at least one complexity catalog, and a complexity catalog to hold at least one list of ordered complexity values associated with the partitioned sub-unit blocks, and an application server to build at least one information summary unit based on the at least one information unit and on at least one associated complexity catalog, and a scoring component to provide scores.
- The present invention will be understood and appreciated more fully from the following detailed description taken in conjunction with the drawings in which:
- FIG. 1 is a schematic block diagram of a system environment of the preferred embodiment of the present invention; and
- FIG. 2 is a schematic block diagram of the information detection and analysis system of the preferred embodiment of the present invention.
- Preferred embodiments will now be described with reference to the drawings. For clarity of description, any element numeral in one figure will represent the same element if used in any other figure.
- The present invention provides a method and system for analysis of data (SAD) by executing complexity calculations of a set of data fields, enabling segmentation of data, providing scores to the separated segmentations and providing final score of clusters of the analyzed segmentations of data. The SAD can be used in a variety of applications such as customer retention, marketing, analysis of credit card transaction and the like. In one preferred embodiment of the present invention the SAD aids a businesses enterprise in customer retention. In contrast the state of art presently is such that customer retention systems mostly include analysis of performance measures, such as quantitative metrics and formulas, for detecting potential performance problems. The measures used include amongst others: retention rate, loyalty index and satisfaction index. These measures are analyzed along the time axis and other customer dimensions such as: customer category, market geography segment, and the like. The customer retention method and system proposed by the preferred embodiment of the present invention includes a complexity calculation tool that attacks the customer retention problem from a different, yet complimentary angle. It gives a numerical parameter to the complexity of the pattern, i.e., whether it is simple and monotonic or erratic and unpredictable, and alerts whenever this parameter changes, e.g. when a transaction of a simple behaving account deviates from its monotonic behavior, or when a monotonic and recurring transactions appear in an erratic account. The customer retention system and method proposed by the preferred embodiment of the present invention provides an end result with a final score. The final score provides analysis that indicates whether a specific customer is about to be lost to the business.
- The new addition to the prior art in business intelligence is divided into two major components: a parameterization of the data by calculating the complexity of a given record, and an analysis method of data records by calculating the complexity of one or more dimensions of the data in a subject oriented way. The parameterization of data enables to attach meaning to a parameter (e.g. high complexity value means an erratic behavior and an unstable customer, low complexity value means a monotonic behavior and a stable customer). Segmentation of data according to a parameter, a better classification can be made (e.g. all the high complexity customers are grouped together in an “erratic behavior group”, while the low complexity customers are in the “monotonic group”). The records are classified according to their behavior and not according to a predetermined property (e.g. demographics). After stratifying the records according to their complexity parameter, further enhanced analysis will be provided by the utilization of additional. For example, analysis by neural networks per cluster of records with a similar complexity parameter will produce a better result and a higher prediction rate than by analyzing the entire set of records together or by a predefined property. The similar complexity groups are better suited for the neural network characteristics than most other types of grouping. Analysis by additional tools (e.g. decision trees and the like) for each cluster of similar complexity records will produce better results for prediction, analysis and understanding of the data.
- The analysis method of data records by calculating the complexity of the data in a subject oriented way enables the selection of the fields of interest and the calculation of the other fields' complexity, thus showing the behavior of the selected fields. For example, in CRM data records, the Customer field can be selected and the complexity of the “Time of Call”, “Length of Call” and “Transaction Made” fields can be calculated, thereby analyzing the behavior of all the customers is accomplished. This innovative analysis method will show whether they always make the same transaction in a short call (low complexity) or call in different times of the day, making all kinds of transaction (high complexity). The analysis provided by the present invention provides the possibility to detect changes of patterns within specific field or combination thereof within an information unit. Thus, as the preferred embodiment is within the field of customer retention, the behavior or a change of behavior of a customer or group of customers over the time axis can be detected.
- For example, by calculating the complexity of all the agents, in CRM data records, this analysis can alert when an agent has deviated from his normal behavior (i.e. when his complexity has changed from previous complexity calculations). Thus, for example, the supervisor can be alerted that the specific agent has changed his behavior.
- By analyzing the complexity of all the fields (e.g. in CRM customers, agents, transactions, etc.), at different times, the new analysis method can detect a change in behavior and generate an alert concerning the change.
- The preferred embodiment will be better understood by relating to FIG. 1 that illustrates the environment of the
SAD 18. TheSAD 18 receives data input fromusers Users DCN 20 can be the Internet, LAN, WAN, a satellite communication network and the like. The mostcommon DCN 20 used is the standard telephone system (POTS) that enables communication via ordinary phone connection lines. - Referring now to FIG. 2 the
SAD 18 includes aninput device 56, acommunication device 54, anoutput device 58 and an analysis andevaluation server platform 22. Theinput device 56 can be a pointing device, a keyboard device or the like. Theoutput device 58 can be a printer, a screen display or the like. Thecommunication device 54 can be a modem, a network interface card or any other suitable communication devices providing transmission and reception of data viaDCN 20 of FIG. 1. according to the preferred embodiment of the present invention the analysis andevaluation server platform 22 includes a processor device 24, and amemory device 26. The processor device 24 is the logic unit designed to perform arithmetic and logic operations by responding to and processing the basic instructions driving the computing device. The processor device 24 can be one of the Intel Pentium series, the PowerPC series, the K6 series, the Celeron, the Athlon, the Duron, the Alpha, or the like. Thememory device 26 includes areference transaction database 28, anoperating system 30, acontrol database 32, acomplexity database catalog 36 and anapplication server 38. Thereference transaction database 28 includes database information including a list of customers, personal information regarding customers, history files containing customer behavior and other relevant information related to credit card holders and agents. Thereference transaction database 28 can be located within theSAD 18 as illustrated in FIG. 2 or in any other separate location. Theoperating system 30 is responsible for managing the operation of the entire set of software programs implemented in the operation of theSAD 18. Theoperating system 30 can be of any known operating system such as Windows NT, Windows XP, UNIX, Linux, VMS, OS/400, AIX, OS X and the like. Thecomplexity database catalog 36 includes all the complexity values assigned to the records processed by thecomplexity engine 52. The complexity values stored within thecomplexity database catalog 36 are discussed in detail in the pending PCT application PCT/IL01/01074 incorporated herein by reference. Thecontrol database 32 controls the input data received by theinput device 56 and the transfer thereof to theapplication server 38. Thecontrol database 32 also directs the movement of the data from thereference transaction database 28 to theapplication server 38 and to thecomplexity database catalog 36 from theapplication server 38. Theapplication server 38 within the preferred embodiment includes acomplexity catalog handler 40, a scoringcomponent 42, alearning component 44, adatabase handler 46, aresource allocation component 48, auser interface component 50 and acomplexity engine 52. Thecomplexity catalog handler 40 is responsible for the obtaining the appropriate complexity metrics records created by theapplication server 38 from thecomplexity database catalog 36. Theresource allocation component 48 is responsible for allocating variable resources to the processing of the separate records in accordance with the complexity metrics thereof. Theuser interface component 50 is a set of specifically designed and developed front-end programs. Thecomponent 50 allows the user of the system to interact dynamically with the system by performing a set of predefined procedures operative to the running of the method. Via thecomponent 50 the user could select an application, as selected for the SAD customer retention purposes, activate the selected application, adjust specific processing parameters, select sets of records for processing according to the complexity metrics thereof, and the like. Thecomponent 50 could be developed as a plug-in to any of the known user interfaces. Thecomponent 50 will be preferably a Graphical User Interface (GUI) but any other manner of interfacing with the user could be used such as a command-driven interface, a menu-driven interface or the like. Thedatabase handler 46 receives the input data records from thecontrol database 32 and provides the records to thecomplexity catalog handler 40. Thedatabase handler 46 further receives complexity values and scores provided to data records from thecomplexity catalog handler 40 and provides thecontrol database 32 that provides thecomplexity database catalog 36 andreference transaction database 28 with the complexity values and scores regarding to data records. Thelearning component 44 provides mechanism for matching a given input such as the complexity vectors for each transaction to a given output such as a customer behavior or deviation of ordinary customer behavior. Thelearning component 44 provides the scoringcomponent 42 with different scores that are than processed within the scoringcomponent 42. Thecomplexity engine 52 provides complexity values to data records received from thecontrol database 32 within theapplication server 38 and handled by thedatabase handler 46. - A person skilled in the art will appreciate that what has been shown is not limited to the description above. Those skilled in the art to which this invention pertains will appreciate many modifications and other embodiments of the invention. It will be apparent that the present invention is not limited to the specific embodiments disclosed and those modifications and other embodiments are intended to be included within the scope of the invention. Although specific terms are employed herein, they are used in a generic and descriptive sense only and not for purposes of limitation. The invention, therefore, is not to be restricted except in the spirit of the claims that follow.
Claims (4)
1. In a computing environment accommodating at least one input device connectable to at least one server device connectable to at least one output device, a method of processing at least one information unit introduced by the at least one input device by the at least one server device to create at least one information score based on the at least one information unit, the method comprising the steps of:
creating at least one complexity catalog based on the at least one information unit; and
establishing at least one score unit based on the at least one complexity catalog; and
establishing scores for analyzing data.
2. The method of claim 1 further comprising the steps of:
obtaining at least one information unit from the at least one input device by the at least one server device; and
displaying at least one scoring unit.
3. The method of claim 1 whereas the information unit contains information about customer behavior.
4. In a computing environment accommodating at least one input device connected to at least one server device having at least one output device, a system for the processing at least one information unit introduced via the at least one input device by the at least one server device to process at least one information unit based, the system comprising the elements of:
an infrastructure server device to create at least one complexity catalog; and
a complexity catalog to hold at least one list of ordered complexity values associated with the partitioned sub-unit blocks; and
an application server to build at least one information summary unit based on the at least one information unit and on at least one associated complexity catalog; and
a scoring component to provide scores.
Priority Applications (3)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
EP03723022A EP1514205A4 (en) | 2002-05-21 | 2003-05-15 | A system and method for analyzing data |
AU2003235989A AU2003235989A1 (en) | 2002-05-21 | 2003-05-15 | A system and method for analyzing data |
PCT/IL2003/000394 WO2003098504A2 (en) | 2002-05-21 | 2003-05-15 | A system and method for analyzing data |
Applications Claiming Priority (4)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
IL146597 | 2001-11-20 | ||
IL14659701A IL146597A0 (en) | 2001-11-20 | 2001-11-20 | Method and system for creating meaningful summaries from interrelated sets of information |
WOPCT/IL01/01074 | 2001-11-21 | ||
PCT/IL2001/001074 WO2002046960A2 (en) | 2000-11-23 | 2001-11-21 | Method and system for creating meaningful summaries from interrelated sets of information units |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
US20030097294A1 true US20030097294A1 (en) | 2003-05-22 |
Family
ID=11075869
Family Applications (8)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US10/145,574 Abandoned US20030095148A1 (en) | 2001-11-20 | 2002-05-13 | System and method for analyzing and evaluation of audio signals |
US10/152,309 Expired - Fee Related US7227975B2 (en) | 2001-11-20 | 2002-05-20 | System and method for analyzing aerial photos |
US10/152,310 Expired - Fee Related US6928228B2 (en) | 2001-11-20 | 2002-05-20 | System and method for detection and analysis of video recordings |
US10/152,308 Expired - Lifetime US7069218B2 (en) | 2001-11-20 | 2002-05-20 | System and method for detection and analysis of audio recordings |
US10/152,169 Abandoned US20030097320A1 (en) | 2001-11-20 | 2002-05-20 | Method and system of data analysis for the detection of fraudulent financial transactions |
US10/154,427 Abandoned US20030097294A1 (en) | 2001-11-20 | 2002-05-21 | System and method for analyzing data |
US10/153,418 Active 2025-05-27 US7142774B2 (en) | 2001-11-20 | 2002-05-21 | System and method for message insertion within video recordings |
US10/152,367 Expired - Lifetime US6768811B2 (en) | 2001-11-20 | 2002-05-21 | System and method for analysis of imagery data |
Family Applications Before (5)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US10/145,574 Abandoned US20030095148A1 (en) | 2001-11-20 | 2002-05-13 | System and method for analyzing and evaluation of audio signals |
US10/152,309 Expired - Fee Related US7227975B2 (en) | 2001-11-20 | 2002-05-20 | System and method for analyzing aerial photos |
US10/152,310 Expired - Fee Related US6928228B2 (en) | 2001-11-20 | 2002-05-20 | System and method for detection and analysis of video recordings |
US10/152,308 Expired - Lifetime US7069218B2 (en) | 2001-11-20 | 2002-05-20 | System and method for detection and analysis of audio recordings |
US10/152,169 Abandoned US20030097320A1 (en) | 2001-11-20 | 2002-05-20 | Method and system of data analysis for the detection of fraudulent financial transactions |
Family Applications After (2)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US10/153,418 Active 2025-05-27 US7142774B2 (en) | 2001-11-20 | 2002-05-21 | System and method for message insertion within video recordings |
US10/152,367 Expired - Lifetime US6768811B2 (en) | 2001-11-20 | 2002-05-21 | System and method for analysis of imagery data |
Country Status (2)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (8) | US20030095148A1 (en) |
IL (2) | IL146597A0 (en) |
Cited By (12)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20040138968A1 (en) * | 2003-01-10 | 2004-07-15 | Rina Systems, Inc. | Purchase card performance system |
US20050149455A1 (en) * | 2003-07-01 | 2005-07-07 | Visa U.S.A. Inc. | Method and system for providing advanced authorization |
US20050177449A1 (en) * | 2003-09-22 | 2005-08-11 | Temares Mark E. | Method and system for purchase-based segmentation |
US20070174074A1 (en) * | 2006-01-24 | 2007-07-26 | International Business Machine Corporation | Method, system, and program product for detecting behavior change in transactional data |
US20080021813A1 (en) * | 2006-07-21 | 2008-01-24 | Sheshunoff Management Services, Lp | Method for scoring accounts for retention and marketing accounts based on retention and profitability |
US20080043983A1 (en) * | 2006-08-15 | 2008-02-21 | Adam Waalkes | System and method for managing a dynamic call flow during automated call processing |
US20090089036A1 (en) * | 2007-09-28 | 2009-04-02 | Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd. | Method And Apparatus for Establishing Network Performance Model |
US20090157598A1 (en) * | 2007-12-13 | 2009-06-18 | Electronic Data Systems Corporation | Systems and processes for evaluating database complexities |
US20110184987A1 (en) * | 2002-12-31 | 2011-07-28 | American Express Travel Related Services Company, Inc. | Method and system for implementing and managing an enterprise identity management for distributed security in a computer system |
US20110184845A1 (en) * | 2002-12-31 | 2011-07-28 | American Express Travel Related Services Company, Inc. | Method and system for implementing and managing an enterprise identity management for distributed security in a computer system |
US20120036126A1 (en) * | 2008-04-10 | 2012-02-09 | Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba | Data creating apparatus and data creating method |
US20160171468A1 (en) * | 2014-12-10 | 2016-06-16 | Meijer, Inc. | System and method for linking pos purchases to shopper membership accounts |
Families Citing this family (105)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US6674894B1 (en) * | 1999-04-20 | 2004-01-06 | University Of Utah Research Foundation | Method and apparatus for enhancing an image using data optimization and segmentation |
EP1225545A1 (en) * | 2001-01-23 | 2002-07-24 | Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. | Image processing method for tracking the deformation of an organ in time |
US20050075929A1 (en) * | 2002-10-17 | 2005-04-07 | Wolinsky Robert I. | System and method for partitioning airtime for distribution and display of content |
US7614065B2 (en) * | 2001-12-17 | 2009-11-03 | Automated Media Services, Inc. | System and method for verifying content displayed on an electronic visual display |
US20030229549A1 (en) | 2001-10-17 | 2003-12-11 | Automated Media Services, Inc. | System and method for providing for out-of-home advertising utilizing a satellite network |
GB2391625A (en) | 2002-08-09 | 2004-02-11 | Diagnostic Ultrasound Europ B | Instantaneous ultrasonic echo measurement of bladder urine volume with a limited number of ultrasound beams |
US8221322B2 (en) | 2002-06-07 | 2012-07-17 | Verathon Inc. | Systems and methods to improve clarity in ultrasound images |
US7819806B2 (en) | 2002-06-07 | 2010-10-26 | Verathon Inc. | System and method to identify and measure organ wall boundaries |
US8221321B2 (en) | 2002-06-07 | 2012-07-17 | Verathon Inc. | Systems and methods for quantification and classification of fluids in human cavities in ultrasound images |
US7450746B2 (en) * | 2002-06-07 | 2008-11-11 | Verathon Inc. | System and method for cardiac imaging |
US7613630B2 (en) * | 2002-10-17 | 2009-11-03 | Automated Media Services, Inc. | System and method for editing existing footage to generate and distribute advertising content to retail locations |
DE10256075A1 (en) * | 2002-11-29 | 2004-06-17 | Siemens Ag | Combined emission and computer tomography unit uses smoothed extrapolation processing to produce reconstruction field outside measurement field |
US20040186370A1 (en) * | 2003-02-10 | 2004-09-23 | Konica Minolta Holdings, Inc. | Medical image processing system, medical image pickup system and method of administrating medical images |
JP4325211B2 (en) * | 2003-02-14 | 2009-09-02 | 富士ゼロックス株式会社 | Information processing system |
US20040236188A1 (en) * | 2003-05-19 | 2004-11-25 | Ge Medical Systems Information | Method and apparatus for monitoring using a mathematical model |
US7590643B2 (en) * | 2003-08-21 | 2009-09-15 | Microsoft Corporation | Systems and methods for extensions and inheritance for units of information manageable by a hardware/software interface system |
US8238696B2 (en) * | 2003-08-21 | 2012-08-07 | Microsoft Corporation | Systems and methods for the implementation of a digital images schema for organizing units of information manageable by a hardware/software interface system |
US8166101B2 (en) | 2003-08-21 | 2012-04-24 | Microsoft Corporation | Systems and methods for the implementation of a synchronization schemas for units of information manageable by a hardware/software interface system |
EP1680684A1 (en) * | 2003-10-24 | 2006-07-19 | Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. | Diagnostic imaging system with user interface |
KR20050049062A (en) * | 2003-11-21 | 2005-05-25 | 삼성전자주식회사 | Apparatus for image sharpening and method thereof |
GB0400984D0 (en) * | 2004-01-16 | 2004-02-18 | Rue De Int Ltd | Security document with threads |
US20050222929A1 (en) * | 2004-04-06 | 2005-10-06 | Pricewaterhousecoopers Llp | Systems and methods for investigation of financial reporting information |
US20050222928A1 (en) * | 2004-04-06 | 2005-10-06 | Pricewaterhousecoopers Llp | Systems and methods for investigation of financial reporting information |
US8732004B1 (en) | 2004-09-22 | 2014-05-20 | Experian Information Solutions, Inc. | Automated analysis of data to generate prospect notifications based on trigger events |
JP4103890B2 (en) * | 2004-12-28 | 2008-06-18 | ソニー株式会社 | Recording method and recording apparatus |
FR2884948B1 (en) * | 2005-04-26 | 2009-01-23 | Gen Electric | METHOD AND DEVICE FOR REDUCING NOISE IN A SEQUENCE OF FLUOROSCOPIC IMAGES |
JP2007013235A (en) * | 2005-06-28 | 2007-01-18 | Canon Inc | Image compositing apparatus, control method and program of image processor |
US20070043577A1 (en) * | 2005-08-16 | 2007-02-22 | Sheldon Kasower | Apparatus and method of enabling a victim of identity theft to resolve and prevent fraud |
US20070098351A1 (en) * | 2005-10-31 | 2007-05-03 | Sony Ericsson Mobile Communication Ab | Methods and computer program products for playing audio/video programs on a portable electronic device |
JP2007194974A (en) * | 2006-01-20 | 2007-08-02 | Hitachi Ltd | Image display device, image recording device, and image distribution control system |
US8920343B2 (en) | 2006-03-23 | 2014-12-30 | Michael Edward Sabatino | Apparatus for acquiring and processing of physiological auditory signals |
DE102006029718A1 (en) * | 2006-06-28 | 2008-01-10 | Siemens Ag | Organ system`s e.g. brain, images evaluating method for detecting pathological change in medical clinical picture, involves extending registration for area to extended registration, such that another area is detected |
GB2440381B (en) * | 2006-07-27 | 2008-11-05 | Motorola Inc | An internet protocol multimedia subsystem network element and method of operation therefor |
US7646936B2 (en) * | 2006-10-03 | 2010-01-12 | Varian Medical Systems International Ag | Spatially variant image deformation |
US8036979B1 (en) | 2006-10-05 | 2011-10-11 | Experian Information Solutions, Inc. | System and method for generating a finance attribute from tradeline data |
US7657497B2 (en) * | 2006-11-07 | 2010-02-02 | Ebay Inc. | Online fraud prevention using genetic algorithm solution |
US20080162321A1 (en) * | 2006-11-07 | 2008-07-03 | Breeden Benjamin T | System and method for processing duplicative electronic check return files |
US20080115213A1 (en) * | 2006-11-14 | 2008-05-15 | Fmr Corp. | Detecting Fraudulent Activity on a Network Using Stored Information |
US8180873B2 (en) * | 2006-11-14 | 2012-05-15 | Fmr Llc | Detecting fraudulent activity |
US7856494B2 (en) * | 2006-11-14 | 2010-12-21 | Fmr Llc | Detecting and interdicting fraudulent activity on a network |
US8145560B2 (en) * | 2006-11-14 | 2012-03-27 | Fmr Llc | Detecting fraudulent activity on a network |
US7657569B1 (en) | 2006-11-28 | 2010-02-02 | Lower My Bills, Inc. | System and method of removing duplicate leads |
US7778885B1 (en) | 2006-12-04 | 2010-08-17 | Lower My Bills, Inc. | System and method of enhancing leads |
US20080162259A1 (en) * | 2006-12-29 | 2008-07-03 | Ebay Inc. | Associated community platform |
US8606666B1 (en) | 2007-01-31 | 2013-12-10 | Experian Information Solutions, Inc. | System and method for providing an aggregation tool |
US8606626B1 (en) | 2007-01-31 | 2013-12-10 | Experian Information Solutions, Inc. | Systems and methods for providing a direct marketing campaign planning environment |
US7975299B1 (en) | 2007-04-05 | 2011-07-05 | Consumerinfo.Com, Inc. | Child identity monitor |
US10769290B2 (en) * | 2007-05-11 | 2020-09-08 | Fair Isaac Corporation | Systems and methods for fraud detection via interactive link analysis |
WO2008141293A2 (en) * | 2007-05-11 | 2008-11-20 | The Board Of Regents Of The University Of Oklahoma One Partner's Place | Image segmentation system and method |
US8133181B2 (en) | 2007-05-16 | 2012-03-13 | Verathon Inc. | Device, system and method to measure abdominal aortic aneurysm diameter |
US8167803B2 (en) | 2007-05-16 | 2012-05-01 | Verathon Inc. | System and method for bladder detection using harmonic imaging |
WO2008147918A2 (en) | 2007-05-25 | 2008-12-04 | Experian Information Solutions, Inc. | System and method for automated detection of never-pay data sets |
JP2009022626A (en) * | 2007-07-23 | 2009-02-05 | Ge Medical Systems Global Technology Co Llc | Ultrasonic imager and image diagnostic system |
US8775475B2 (en) * | 2007-11-09 | 2014-07-08 | Ebay Inc. | Transaction data representations using an adjacency matrix |
US8204840B2 (en) * | 2007-11-09 | 2012-06-19 | Ebay Inc. | Global conduct score and attribute data utilization pertaining to commercial transactions and page views |
US8561081B1 (en) | 2007-11-13 | 2013-10-15 | Accenture Global Services Limited | System and method for dynamic brokering of digital content requests |
US8046324B2 (en) | 2007-11-30 | 2011-10-25 | Ebay Inc. | Graph pattern recognition interface |
US8346559B2 (en) | 2007-12-20 | 2013-01-01 | Dean Enterprises, Llc | Detection of conditions from sound |
US20090204479A1 (en) * | 2008-02-08 | 2009-08-13 | Automated Media Services, Inc. | System and method for creating an in-store media network using traditional media metrics |
US10373198B1 (en) | 2008-06-13 | 2019-08-06 | Lmb Mortgage Services, Inc. | System and method of generating existing customer leads |
US7991689B1 (en) | 2008-07-23 | 2011-08-02 | Experian Information Solutions, Inc. | Systems and methods for detecting bust out fraud using credit data |
US8237962B2 (en) | 2008-12-10 | 2012-08-07 | Xerox Corporation | Throughput estimate based upon document complexity analysis |
US20100174638A1 (en) | 2009-01-06 | 2010-07-08 | ConsumerInfo.com | Report existence monitoring |
US8449301B2 (en) * | 2009-02-12 | 2013-05-28 | American Registry for Diagnostic Medical Sonography, Inc. | Systems and methods for assessing a medical ultrasound imaging operator's competency |
JP5481163B2 (en) * | 2009-10-30 | 2014-04-23 | 株式会社東芝 | Magnetic resonance imaging system |
US8520920B2 (en) * | 2009-11-11 | 2013-08-27 | Siemens Corporation | System for dynamically improving medical image acquisition quality |
US9554111B2 (en) * | 2010-03-08 | 2017-01-24 | Magisto Ltd. | System and method for semi-automatic video editing |
US9502073B2 (en) | 2010-03-08 | 2016-11-22 | Magisto Ltd. | System and method for semi-automatic video editing |
US9189137B2 (en) | 2010-03-08 | 2015-11-17 | Magisto Ltd. | Method and system for browsing, searching and sharing of personal video by a non-parametric approach |
US9652802B1 (en) | 2010-03-24 | 2017-05-16 | Consumerinfo.Com, Inc. | Indirect monitoring and reporting of a user's credit data |
US8725613B1 (en) | 2010-04-27 | 2014-05-13 | Experian Information Solutions, Inc. | Systems and methods for early account score and notification |
US10453093B1 (en) | 2010-04-30 | 2019-10-22 | Lmb Mortgage Services, Inc. | System and method of optimizing matching of leads |
US8737702B2 (en) * | 2010-07-23 | 2014-05-27 | International Business Machines Corporation | Systems and methods for automated extraction of measurement information in medical videos |
WO2012078810A2 (en) * | 2010-12-07 | 2012-06-14 | Groupon Zappedy, Inc. | Method and system for credit card holder identification |
CA2827478C (en) | 2011-02-18 | 2020-07-28 | Csidentity Corporation | System and methods for identifying compromised personally identifiable information on the internet |
DE102011075917B4 (en) * | 2011-05-16 | 2021-10-28 | Siemens Healthcare Gmbh | Method for providing a 3D image data set with suppressed measuring field exceedance artifacts and computer tomograph |
US20130024300A1 (en) * | 2011-07-21 | 2013-01-24 | Bank Of America Corporation | Multi-stage filtering for fraud detection using geo-positioning data |
US8620875B2 (en) * | 2011-07-25 | 2013-12-31 | Salesforce.Com, Inc. | Fraud analysis in a contact database |
US8996381B2 (en) * | 2011-09-27 | 2015-03-31 | Sensory, Incorporated | Background speech recognition assistant |
US8768707B2 (en) | 2011-09-27 | 2014-07-01 | Sensory Incorporated | Background speech recognition assistant using speaker verification |
US11030562B1 (en) | 2011-10-31 | 2021-06-08 | Consumerinfo.Com, Inc. | Pre-data breach monitoring |
US8832120B2 (en) | 2012-01-30 | 2014-09-09 | Mastercard International Incorporated | Methods and systems for analyzing weirdness of variables |
US8712126B2 (en) * | 2012-03-12 | 2014-04-29 | Xerox Corporation | Web-based system and method for video analysis |
US9449380B2 (en) * | 2012-03-20 | 2016-09-20 | Siemens Medical Solutions Usa, Inc. | Medical image quality monitoring and improvement system |
US9064392B2 (en) * | 2012-10-23 | 2015-06-23 | Verizon Patent And Licensing Inc. | Method and system for awareness detection |
US10255598B1 (en) | 2012-12-06 | 2019-04-09 | Consumerinfo.Com, Inc. | Credit card account data extraction |
US8812387B1 (en) | 2013-03-14 | 2014-08-19 | Csidentity Corporation | System and method for identifying related credit inquiries |
US9633322B1 (en) | 2013-03-15 | 2017-04-25 | Consumerinfo.Com, Inc. | Adjustment of knowledge-based authentication |
TWI494780B (en) * | 2013-08-22 | 2015-08-01 | Apacer Technology Inc | Method and system for sorting photos base on geographic position, and computer readable recording media |
US20150178825A1 (en) * | 2013-12-23 | 2015-06-25 | Citibank, N.A. | Methods and Apparatus for Quantitative Assessment of Behavior in Financial Entities and Transactions |
US10262362B1 (en) | 2014-02-14 | 2019-04-16 | Experian Information Solutions, Inc. | Automatic generation of code for attributes |
US9396409B2 (en) | 2014-09-29 | 2016-07-19 | At&T Intellectual Property I, L.P. | Object based image processing |
US10339527B1 (en) | 2014-10-31 | 2019-07-02 | Experian Information Solutions, Inc. | System and architecture for electronic fraud detection |
US10242019B1 (en) | 2014-12-19 | 2019-03-26 | Experian Information Solutions, Inc. | User behavior segmentation using latent topic detection |
US11151468B1 (en) | 2015-07-02 | 2021-10-19 | Experian Information Solutions, Inc. | Behavior analysis using distributed representations of event data |
US9962489B2 (en) | 2016-06-15 | 2018-05-08 | True Concepts Medical Technologies, Llc | Syringe systems and methods for multi-stage fluid delivery |
US11167085B2 (en) | 2016-06-15 | 2021-11-09 | True Concepts Medical Technologies, Llc | Syringe systems and methods for multi-stage fluid delivery |
US10699028B1 (en) | 2017-09-28 | 2020-06-30 | Csidentity Corporation | Identity security architecture systems and methods |
US10896472B1 (en) | 2017-11-14 | 2021-01-19 | Csidentity Corporation | Security and identity verification system and architecture |
US11574360B2 (en) | 2019-02-05 | 2023-02-07 | International Business Machines Corporation | Fraud detection based on community change analysis |
US11593811B2 (en) | 2019-02-05 | 2023-02-28 | International Business Machines Corporation | Fraud detection based on community change analysis using a machine learning model |
WO2021046648A1 (en) * | 2019-09-12 | 2021-03-18 | Mastercard Technologies Canada ULC | Fraud detection based on known user identification |
CN111274443B (en) * | 2020-01-10 | 2023-06-09 | 北京百度网讯科技有限公司 | Video clip description generation method and device, electronic equipment and storage medium |
US11392954B2 (en) | 2020-10-14 | 2022-07-19 | Feedzai—Consultadoria e Inovação Tecnológica, S.A. | Hierarchical machine learning model for performing a decision task and an explanation task |
US11544471B2 (en) | 2020-10-14 | 2023-01-03 | Feedzai—Consultadoria e Inovação Tecnológica, S.A. | Weakly supervised multi-task learning for concept-based explainability |
Citations (10)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US4773009A (en) * | 1986-06-06 | 1988-09-20 | Houghton Mifflin Company | Method and apparatus for text analysis |
US5732158A (en) * | 1994-11-23 | 1998-03-24 | Tec-Masters, Inc. | Fractal dimension analyzer and forecaster |
US5748851A (en) * | 1994-02-28 | 1998-05-05 | Kabushiki Kaisha Meidensha | Method and apparatus for executing short-term prediction of timeseries data |
US20020069079A1 (en) * | 2001-07-13 | 2002-06-06 | Vega Lilly Mae | Method and system for facilitating service transactions |
US20020099649A1 (en) * | 2000-04-06 | 2002-07-25 | Lee Walter W. | Identification and management of fraudulent credit/debit card purchases at merchant ecommerce sites |
US6526389B1 (en) * | 1999-04-20 | 2003-02-25 | Amdocs Software Systems Limited | Telecommunications system for generating a three-level customer behavior profile and for detecting deviation from the profile to identify fraud |
US6542894B1 (en) * | 1998-12-09 | 2003-04-01 | Unica Technologies, Inc. | Execution of multiple models using data segmentation |
US20030105658A1 (en) * | 1999-12-15 | 2003-06-05 | Keith D Grzelak | Customer profiling apparatus for conducting customer behavior pattern analysis, and method for comparing customer behavior patterns |
US6839682B1 (en) * | 1999-05-06 | 2005-01-04 | Fair Isaac Corporation | Predictive modeling of consumer financial behavior using supervised segmentation and nearest-neighbor matching |
US20050154632A1 (en) * | 1999-06-01 | 2005-07-14 | Diane Lambert | Method for constructing an updateable database of subject behavior patterns |
Family Cites Families (34)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US4945478A (en) * | 1987-11-06 | 1990-07-31 | Center For Innovative Technology | Noninvasive medical imaging system and method for the identification and 3-D display of atherosclerosis and the like |
US5235510A (en) * | 1990-11-22 | 1993-08-10 | Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba | Computer-aided diagnosis system for medical use |
US5301679A (en) * | 1991-05-31 | 1994-04-12 | Taylor Microtechnology, Inc. | Method and system for analysis of body sounds |
US5819226A (en) * | 1992-09-08 | 1998-10-06 | Hnc Software Inc. | Fraud detection using predictive modeling |
US5452416A (en) * | 1992-12-30 | 1995-09-19 | Dominator Radiology, Inc. | Automated system and a method for organizing, presenting, and manipulating medical images |
US5431161A (en) * | 1993-04-15 | 1995-07-11 | Adac Laboratories | Method and apparatus for information acquistion, processing, and display within a medical camera system |
US5384703A (en) * | 1993-07-02 | 1995-01-24 | Xerox Corporation | Method and apparatus for summarizing documents according to theme |
US6022315A (en) * | 1993-12-29 | 2000-02-08 | First Opinion Corporation | Computerized medical diagnostic and treatment advice system including network access |
AU5027796A (en) * | 1995-03-07 | 1996-09-23 | Interval Research Corporation | System and method for selective recording of information |
US5659741A (en) * | 1995-03-29 | 1997-08-19 | Stuart S. Bowie | Computer system and method for storing medical histories using a carrying size card |
US6070141A (en) * | 1995-05-08 | 2000-05-30 | Image Data, Llc | System and method of assessing the quality of an identification transaction using an identificaion quality score |
US5957866A (en) * | 1995-07-03 | 1999-09-28 | University Technology Corporation | Apparatus and methods for analyzing body sounds |
US6430309B1 (en) * | 1995-09-15 | 2002-08-06 | Monogen, Inc. | Specimen preview and inspection system |
US5995153A (en) * | 1995-11-02 | 1999-11-30 | Prime Image, Inc. | Video processing system with real time program duration compression and expansion |
US5988862A (en) * | 1996-04-24 | 1999-11-23 | Cyra Technologies, Inc. | Integrated system for quickly and accurately imaging and modeling three dimensional objects |
US6006191A (en) * | 1996-05-13 | 1999-12-21 | Dirienzo; Andrew L. | Remote access medical image exchange system and methods of operation therefor |
US5895453A (en) * | 1996-08-27 | 1999-04-20 | Sts Systems, Ltd. | Method and system for the detection, management and prevention of losses in retail and other environments |
US6050950A (en) * | 1996-12-18 | 2000-04-18 | Aurora Holdings, Llc | Passive/non-invasive systemic and pulmonary blood pressure measurement |
US6018723A (en) * | 1997-05-27 | 2000-01-25 | Visa International Service Association | Method and apparatus for pattern generation |
US7016413B2 (en) * | 1998-03-20 | 2006-03-21 | International Business Machines Corporation | Adaptively encoding a picture of contrasted complexity having normal video and noisy video portions |
US6473516B1 (en) * | 1998-05-22 | 2002-10-29 | Asa Systems, Inc. | Large capacity steganography |
US6825875B1 (en) * | 1999-01-05 | 2004-11-30 | Interval Research Corporation | Hybrid recording unit including portable video recorder and auxillary device |
JP3508836B2 (en) * | 1999-06-22 | 2004-03-22 | インターナショナル・ビジネス・マシーンズ・コーポレーション | Apparatus and method for detecting approximate position of two-dimensional code |
US6275806B1 (en) * | 1999-08-31 | 2001-08-14 | Andersen Consulting, Llp | System method and article of manufacture for detecting emotion in voice signals by utilizing statistics for voice signal parameters |
US6151571A (en) * | 1999-08-31 | 2000-11-21 | Andersen Consulting | System, method and article of manufacture for detecting emotion in voice signals through analysis of a plurality of voice signal parameters |
AU7845900A (en) * | 1999-09-29 | 2001-04-30 | Siemens Corporate Research, Inc. | Multi-modal cardiac diagnostic decision support system and method |
KR100355404B1 (en) * | 1999-12-03 | 2002-10-11 | 삼성전자 주식회사 | Texture description method and texture retrieval method using Gabor filter in frequency domain |
US6539330B2 (en) * | 2000-07-19 | 2003-03-25 | Pentax Corporation | Method and apparatus for measuring 3-D information |
US6705990B1 (en) * | 2000-07-25 | 2004-03-16 | Tensys Medical, Inc. | Method and apparatus for monitoring physiologic parameters of a living subject |
US6763136B1 (en) * | 2000-09-19 | 2004-07-13 | Bae Systems Mission Solutions, Inc. | Method and apparatus for determining spectral similarity |
US6834120B1 (en) * | 2000-11-15 | 2004-12-21 | Sri International | Method and system for estimating the accuracy of inference algorithms using the self-consistency methodology |
US6604126B2 (en) * | 2001-04-11 | 2003-08-05 | Richard S. Neiman | Structural data presentation method |
US6735348B2 (en) * | 2001-05-01 | 2004-05-11 | Space Imaging, Llc | Apparatuses and methods for mapping image coordinates to ground coordinates |
US6868172B2 (en) * | 2001-10-03 | 2005-03-15 | Eastman Kodak Company | Method for registering images in a radiography application |
-
2001
- 2001-11-20 IL IL14659701A patent/IL146597A0/en unknown
-
2002
- 2002-05-07 IL IL149523A patent/IL149523A/en not_active IP Right Cessation
- 2002-05-13 US US10/145,574 patent/US20030095148A1/en not_active Abandoned
- 2002-05-20 US US10/152,309 patent/US7227975B2/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
- 2002-05-20 US US10/152,310 patent/US6928228B2/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
- 2002-05-20 US US10/152,308 patent/US7069218B2/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 2002-05-20 US US10/152,169 patent/US20030097320A1/en not_active Abandoned
- 2002-05-21 US US10/154,427 patent/US20030097294A1/en not_active Abandoned
- 2002-05-21 US US10/153,418 patent/US7142774B2/en active Active
- 2002-05-21 US US10/152,367 patent/US6768811B2/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
Patent Citations (10)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US4773009A (en) * | 1986-06-06 | 1988-09-20 | Houghton Mifflin Company | Method and apparatus for text analysis |
US5748851A (en) * | 1994-02-28 | 1998-05-05 | Kabushiki Kaisha Meidensha | Method and apparatus for executing short-term prediction of timeseries data |
US5732158A (en) * | 1994-11-23 | 1998-03-24 | Tec-Masters, Inc. | Fractal dimension analyzer and forecaster |
US6542894B1 (en) * | 1998-12-09 | 2003-04-01 | Unica Technologies, Inc. | Execution of multiple models using data segmentation |
US6526389B1 (en) * | 1999-04-20 | 2003-02-25 | Amdocs Software Systems Limited | Telecommunications system for generating a three-level customer behavior profile and for detecting deviation from the profile to identify fraud |
US6839682B1 (en) * | 1999-05-06 | 2005-01-04 | Fair Isaac Corporation | Predictive modeling of consumer financial behavior using supervised segmentation and nearest-neighbor matching |
US20050154632A1 (en) * | 1999-06-01 | 2005-07-14 | Diane Lambert | Method for constructing an updateable database of subject behavior patterns |
US20030105658A1 (en) * | 1999-12-15 | 2003-06-05 | Keith D Grzelak | Customer profiling apparatus for conducting customer behavior pattern analysis, and method for comparing customer behavior patterns |
US20020099649A1 (en) * | 2000-04-06 | 2002-07-25 | Lee Walter W. | Identification and management of fraudulent credit/debit card purchases at merchant ecommerce sites |
US20020069079A1 (en) * | 2001-07-13 | 2002-06-06 | Vega Lilly Mae | Method and system for facilitating service transactions |
Cited By (31)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20110184860A1 (en) * | 2002-12-31 | 2011-07-28 | American Express Travel Related Services Company, Inc. | Method and system for implementing and managing an enterprise identity management for distributed security in a computer system |
US20110184986A1 (en) * | 2002-12-31 | 2011-07-28 | American Express Travel Related Service Company, Inc. | Method and system for implementing and managing an enterprise identity management for distributed security in a computer system |
US20110184845A1 (en) * | 2002-12-31 | 2011-07-28 | American Express Travel Related Services Company, Inc. | Method and system for implementing and managing an enterprise identity management for distributed security in a computer system |
US20110184985A1 (en) * | 2002-12-31 | 2011-07-28 | American Express Travel Related Services Company, Inc. | Method and system for implementing and managing an enterprise identity management for distributed security in a computer system |
US20110184987A1 (en) * | 2002-12-31 | 2011-07-28 | American Express Travel Related Services Company, Inc. | Method and system for implementing and managing an enterprise identity management for distributed security in a computer system |
US20110202565A1 (en) * | 2002-12-31 | 2011-08-18 | American Express Travel Related Services Company, Inc. | Method and system for implementing and managing an enterprise identity management for distributed security in a computer system |
US20110184861A1 (en) * | 2002-12-31 | 2011-07-28 | American Express Travel Related Services Company, Inc. | Method and system for implementing and managing an enterprise identity management for distributed security in a computer system |
US20110184988A1 (en) * | 2002-12-31 | 2011-07-28 | American Express Travel Related Services Company, | Method and system for implementing and managing an enterprise identity management for distributed security in a computer system |
US20040138968A1 (en) * | 2003-01-10 | 2004-07-15 | Rina Systems, Inc. | Purchase card performance system |
US9785944B2 (en) | 2003-07-01 | 2017-10-10 | Visa U.S.A. Inc. | Method and system for providing risk information in connection with transaction processing |
US20110112954A1 (en) * | 2003-07-01 | 2011-05-12 | Bruesewitz Belva J | Method and System for Providing Risk Information in Connection with Transaction Processing |
US7809650B2 (en) * | 2003-07-01 | 2010-10-05 | Visa U.S.A. Inc. | Method and system for providing risk information in connection with transaction processing |
US8706641B2 (en) | 2003-07-01 | 2014-04-22 | Visa U.S.A. Inc. | Method and system for providing risk information in connection with transaction processing |
US10580005B2 (en) | 2003-07-01 | 2020-03-03 | Visa U.S.A. Inc. | Method and system for providing risk information in connection with transaction processing |
US20050149455A1 (en) * | 2003-07-01 | 2005-07-07 | Visa U.S.A. Inc. | Method and system for providing advanced authorization |
US20110231227A1 (en) * | 2003-09-22 | 2011-09-22 | Citicorp Credit Services, Inc. | Method and system for purchase-based segmentation |
US20050177449A1 (en) * | 2003-09-22 | 2005-08-11 | Temares Mark E. | Method and system for purchase-based segmentation |
US7966226B1 (en) | 2003-09-22 | 2011-06-21 | Citicorp Credit Services, Inc. | Method and system for purchase-based segmentation |
US7328169B2 (en) | 2003-09-22 | 2008-02-05 | Citicorp Credit Services, Inc. | Method and system for purchase-based segmentation |
US20070174074A1 (en) * | 2006-01-24 | 2007-07-26 | International Business Machine Corporation | Method, system, and program product for detecting behavior change in transactional data |
US20080021813A1 (en) * | 2006-07-21 | 2008-01-24 | Sheshunoff Management Services, Lp | Method for scoring accounts for retention and marketing accounts based on retention and profitability |
US20080043983A1 (en) * | 2006-08-15 | 2008-02-21 | Adam Waalkes | System and method for managing a dynamic call flow during automated call processing |
US9438734B2 (en) * | 2006-08-15 | 2016-09-06 | Intellisist, Inc. | System and method for managing a dynamic call flow during automated call processing |
US20090089036A1 (en) * | 2007-09-28 | 2009-04-02 | Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd. | Method And Apparatus for Establishing Network Performance Model |
US8478570B2 (en) * | 2007-09-28 | 2013-07-02 | Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd. | Method and apparatus for establishing network performance model |
US8001158B2 (en) * | 2007-12-13 | 2011-08-16 | Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. | Systems and processes for evaluating database complexities |
US20090157598A1 (en) * | 2007-12-13 | 2009-06-18 | Electronic Data Systems Corporation | Systems and processes for evaluating database complexities |
US8589390B2 (en) * | 2008-04-10 | 2013-11-19 | Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba | Data creating apparatus and data creating method |
US20120036126A1 (en) * | 2008-04-10 | 2012-02-09 | Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba | Data creating apparatus and data creating method |
US20160171468A1 (en) * | 2014-12-10 | 2016-06-16 | Meijer, Inc. | System and method for linking pos purchases to shopper membership accounts |
US10325250B2 (en) * | 2014-12-10 | 2019-06-18 | Meijer, Inc. | System and method for linking POS purchases to shopper membership accounts |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
US7227975B2 (en) | 2007-06-05 |
US20030095684A1 (en) | 2003-05-22 |
US20030097255A1 (en) | 2003-05-22 |
US7069218B2 (en) | 2006-06-27 |
IL149523A0 (en) | 2002-11-10 |
US7142774B2 (en) | 2006-11-28 |
US6928228B2 (en) | 2005-08-09 |
US20030095782A1 (en) | 2003-05-22 |
US20030097320A1 (en) | 2003-05-22 |
US20030095784A1 (en) | 2003-05-22 |
IL146597A0 (en) | 2002-08-14 |
US20030095148A1 (en) | 2003-05-22 |
IL149523A (en) | 2008-06-05 |
US6768811B2 (en) | 2004-07-27 |
US20030095694A1 (en) | 2003-05-22 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US20030097294A1 (en) | System and method for analyzing data | |
US11100435B2 (en) | Machine learning artificial intelligence system for predicting hours of operation | |
CN106506454B (en) | Cheat business recognition method and device | |
US7813952B2 (en) | Managing customer loss using customer groups | |
US20150332414A1 (en) | System and method for predicting items purchased based on transaction data | |
US20040039593A1 (en) | Managing customer loss using customer value | |
US20070174214A1 (en) | Integrated fraud management systems and methods | |
Reid et al. | Invisible data quality issues in a CRM implementation | |
US20040034558A1 (en) | Managing customer loss using a graphical user interface | |
AU2018275026B2 (en) | System and method for pattern-recognition based monitoring and controlled processing of data objects based on conformity measurements | |
JP2020523715A (en) | Improved detection of fraudulent transactions | |
WO2010059840A2 (en) | System and method using a transaction aggregator, superkeys and subkeys | |
GB2303275A (en) | Detecting mobile telephone misuse | |
Goldberg et al. | The NASD Securities Observation, New Analysis and Regulation System (SONAR). | |
AU2002354789A1 (en) | Business process policy object | |
CA2452730A1 (en) | Business process policy object | |
CN112598513B (en) | Method and device for identifying stockholder risk transaction behaviors | |
US20030204426A1 (en) | Decision management system which searches for strategy components | |
Mahesh et al. | Factors affecting the intention to adopt big data technology: A study based on financial services industry of Sri Lanka | |
US7580878B1 (en) | Data fusion for automated business decisions | |
JP2005148856A (en) | Method, program, and system for measuring it system investment effect | |
US20020152146A1 (en) | Method and apparatus for identifying patent licensing targets | |
KR102378302B1 (en) | Method and server for recommending financial product based on consumption pattern | |
WO2003098504A2 (en) | A system and method for analyzing data | |
KR100738899B1 (en) | System for providing service of inauguration and management consult using credit payment system |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: GORDONOMICS LTD., ISRAEL Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:GORDON, GOREN;REEL/FRAME:013421/0210 Effective date: 20020731 |
|
STCB | Information on status: application discontinuation |
Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION |