US20030199338A1

US20030199338A1 - Multi-core, multi-layer cover golf ball

Info

Publication number: US20030199338A1
Application number: US09/877,835
Authority: US
Inventors: R. Nesbitt
Original assignee: Individual
Current assignee: Bank of America Corp; Topgolf Callaway Brands Corp
Priority date: 1997-03-28
Filing date: 2001-06-08
Publication date: 2003-10-23
Also published as: WO2002100491A1; GB0329735D0; GB2392104A; CA2450010A1

Abstract

The present invention is directed to a golf ball comprising a multi-layer core component. The multi-layer core comprises an interior center component formed from a thermoset material, a thermoplastic material, or combinations thereof. The multi-layer core also comprises a core layer disposed about the center component, formed from a thermoset material, a thermoplastic material, or combinations thereof. The present invention golf ball may further comprise an outer core layer that surrounds the multi-layer core. The resulting multi-layered golf ball of the present invention provides for enhanced distance without sacrificing playability or durability when compared to known golf balls.

Description

CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS [0001]
This application claims priority as a continuation-in-part of U.S. Ser. No. 09/829,708, filed Apr. 10, 2001, which is a continuation of U.S. Ser. No. 09/048,701; filed Mar. 26, 1998, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,213,895 which claims priority to U.S. provisional patent application serial No. 60/042,439 filed Mar. 28, 1997. This application also claims priority as a continuation-in-part of U.S. application Ser. No. 09/394,829; filed Sep. 13, 1999, and as a continuation-in-part of U.S. application Ser. No. 09/562,773, filed May 2, 2000, which is a continuation of U.S. Ser. No. 09/049,410, filed Mar. 27, 1998 now U.S. Pat. No. 6,057,403.[0002]

FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The present invention relates generally to golf balls and, more particularly, to improved golf balls comprising unique multi-layer core and cover configurations. The improved golf balls provide for enhanced distance and durability properties.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

A number of two-piece (a solid resilient center or core with a molded cover) and three-piece (a liquid or solid center, elastomeric winding about the center, and a molded cover) golf balls have been produced. The different types of materials utilized to formulate the cores, covers, etc. of these balls dramatically alters the balls' overall characteristics. In addition, multi-layered covers containing one or more ionomer resins have also been formulated in an attempt to produce a golf ball

Despite the great number of materials and combinations of materials utilized in prior art golf balls, there still remains a need for an improved golf ball exhibiting superior properties.

These and other objects and features of the invention will be apparent from the following summary and description of the invention, the drawings and from the claims.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The present invention relates to new and improved golf balls which overcome the above referenced problems and others.

In one aspect, the present invention provides a golf ball comprising a multi-layer core comprising a center component and at least one core layer disposed about the center component. The center component comprises a thermoset material and the core layer comprises a thermoset material.

In yet another aspect, the present invention provides a golf ball comprising a multi-layer core comprising a center component and a core layer disposed about the center component. The center component comprises a thermoplastic material and the core layer comprises a thermoset material.

In yet another aspect, the present invention provides a multi-layer golf ball comprising a multi-layer core component that includes a center component and a core layer disposed about the center component. The center component comprises a thermoset material and the core layer comprises a thermoplastic material.

In yet another embodiment, the present invention provides a multi-layer golf ball comprising a multi-layer core, having a center component and a core layer, both of which comprise a thermoplastic material.

In addition, for each of the above recited aspects, a cover selected from multi-layer covers and single layer covers is provided. The multi-layer covers comprise a relatively hard inner layer and a relatively soft outer layer or, conversely, a relatively soft inner layer and a relatively hard outer layer. The components of the cover may be ionomeric, non-ionomeric, or in the case of multi-layer covers, a combination thereof.

Other objects will be, in part, obvious and, in part, pointed out in greater detail hereinafter.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The following is a brief description of the drawings which are presented for the purpose of illustrationg the invention and not for the purpose of limiting the same. [0014]
FIG. 1 is a cross-sectional view of a preferred embodiment golf ball in accordance with the present invention comprising a dual core component and a single layer cover; [0015]
FIG. 2 is a cross-sectional view of another preferred embodiment golf ball in accordance with the present invention comprising a dual core component and a multi-layer cover; [0016]
FIG. 3 is a cross-sectional view of another preferred embodiment golf ball in accordance with the present invention comprising a multi-layer core component including multiple core layers; [0017]
FIG. 4 is a cross sectional view of yet another preferred embodiment golf ball in accordance with the present invention comprising a dual core component and a multi-layer cover; [0018]
FIG. 5 is a schematic view of an assembly used for molding a preferred embodiment golf ball in accordance with the present invention. [0019]

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS

The present invention is directed to a golf ball comprising a multi-layer core component. The present invention golf balls preferably utilize a multi-layer cover. However, the golf balls may instead utilize conventional cover materials such as balata or blends of balata with elastomeric or plastic materials. [0020]
As mentioned, the golf balls of the present invention utilize a unique multi-layer core configuration. Preferably, the cores comprise (i) an interior spherical center component formed from a thermoset material, a thermoplastic material, or combinations thereof; and (ii) a core layer disposed about the spherical center component, the core layer formed from a thermoset material, a thermoplastic material, or combinations thereof. The cores may further comprise (iii) an optional outer core layer disposed about the core layer. The outer core layer may be formed from a thermoset material, a thermoplastic material, or combinations thereof. [0021]
Although the present invention is primarily directed to golf balls comprising a multi-layer core component and preferably in conjunction with a multi-layer cover as described herein, the present invention also includes golf balls having a multi-layer core component and conventional covers comprising balata, various thermoplastic materials, cast polyurethanes, or any other known cover material. [0022]
With respect to the multi-layer golf ball covers, these covers include a first or inner layer or ply of a high acid (greater than 16 weight percent acid) ionomer blend or, more preferably, a low acid (16 weight percent acid or less) ionomer blend and second or outer layer or ply comprised of a comparatively softer, low modulus ionomer, ionomer blend or other non-ionomeric thermoplastic or thermosetting elastomer such as polyurethane or polyester elastomer. The multi-layer golf balls of the present invention can be of standard or enlarged size. Preferably, the inner layer or ply includes a blend of low acid ionomers and has a Shore D hardness of 70 or greater and the outer cover layer comprised of polyurethane and has a Shore D hardness of about 45 (i.e., Shore C hardness of about 65). [0023]
It has been found that multi-layer golf balls having inner and outer cover layers exhibit higher C.O.R. values and have greater travel distance in comparison with balls made from a single cover layer. In addition, it has been found that use of an inner cover layer constructed of a blend of low acid (i.e., 16 weight percent acid or less) ionomer resins produces softer compression and higher spin rates than inner cover layers constructed of high acid ionomer resins. This is compounded by the fact that the softer polyurethane outer layer adds to the desirable “feel” and high spin rate while maintaining respectable resilience. The soft outer layer allows the cover to deform more during impact and increases the area of contact between the club face and the cover, thereby imparting more spin on the ball. As a result, the soft polyurethane cover provides the ball with a balata-like feel and playability characteristics with improved distance and durability. [0024]
Consequently, the overall combination of the unique multi-layer core configuration, described in greater detail herein, and the multi-layer cover construction of inner and outer cover layers made, for example, from blends of low acid ionomer resins and polyurethane results in a standard size or oversized golf ball having enhanced resilience (improved travel distance) and durability (i.e. cut resistance, etc.) characteristics while maintaining and in many instances, improving the ball's playability properties. [0025]
The combination of a low acid ionomer blend inner cover layer with a soft, relatively low modulus ionomer, polyurethane based elastomer outer cover layer provides for good overall coefficient of restitution (i.e., enhanced resilience) while at the same time demonstrating improved compression and spin. The outer cover layer generally contributes to a more desirable feel and spin, particularly at lower swing speeds with highly lofted clubs such as half wedge shots. [0026]
Accordingly, the present invention is directed to a golf ball comprising a multi-layer core configuration and an improved multi-layer cover which produces, upon molding each layer around a core to formulate a multi-layer cover, a golf ball exhibiting enhanced distance (i.e., resilience) without adversely affecting, and in many instances, improving the ball's playability (hardness/softness) and/or durability (i.e., cut resistance, fatigue resistance, etc.) characteristics. [0027]
FIGS. 1 and 2 illustrate a preferred [0028] embodiment golf ball 10 and 20 in accordance with the present invention. It will be understood that none of the referenced figures are to scale. And so, the thicknesses and proportions of the various layers and the diameter of the various core components are not necessarily as depicted.
The golf ball [0029] 10 (FIG. 1) comprises a single layer cover 16 disposed about a core 12 and a core layer 14. The core 12 of the golf ball can be formed of a solid, a wound, a liquid including combinations thereof, or any other substances that may be utilized to form the novel multi-layer core described herein.
The golf ball [0030] 20 (FIG. 2) comprises a multi-layer cover 26, 28, disposed about a core 22 and a core layer 24. The core 22 of the golf ball can be formed of a solid, a liquid, a wound, including combinations thereof, or any other substances that may be utilized to form the novel multi-layer core described herein.
The multi-layered cover of [0031] golf ball 20 comprises two layers: a first or inner layer or ply 26 and a second or outer layer or ply 28. The inner layer 26 can be ionomer, ionomer blends, non-ionomer, non-ionomer blends, or blends of ionomer and non-ionomer. The outer layer 28 is softer than the inner layer and can be ionomer, ionomer blends, non-ionomer, non-ionomer blends or blends of ionomer and non-ionomer.
In a first preferred embodiment as shown in FIG. 2, the [0032] inner cover layer 26 is comprised of a high acid (i.e., greater than 16 weight percent acid) ionomer resin or a high acid ionomer blend. Preferably, the inner cover layer 26 is comprised of a blend of two or more high acid (i.e., at least 16 weight percent acid) ionomer resins neutralized to various extents by different metal cations.
The [0033] inner cover layer 26 may or may not include a metal stearate (e.g., zinc stearate) or other metal fatty acid salt. The purpose of the metal stearate or other metal fatty acid salt is to lower the cost of production without affecting the overall performance of the finished golf ball.
In a second embodiment, the [0034] inner layer 26 is comprised of a low acid (i.e., 16 weight percent acid or less) ionomer blend. Preferably, the inner cover layer 26 is comprised of a blend of two or more low acid (i.e., 16 weight percent acid or less) ionomer resins neutralized to various extents by different metal cations. The inner cover layer 26 may or may not include a metal stearate (e.g., zinc stearate) or other metal fatty acid salt.
Two principal properties involved in golf ball performance are resilience and hardness. Resilience is determined by the coefficient of restitution (C.O.R.), the constant “e” which is the ratio of the relative velocity of an elastic sphere after direct impact to that before impact. As a result, the coefficient of restitution (“e”) can vary from 0 to 1, with 1 being equivalent to a perfectly or completely elastic collision and 0 being equivalent to a perfectly or completely inelastic collision. [0035]
Resilience (C.O.R.), along with additional factors such as club head speed, angle of trajectory and ball configuration (i.e., dimple pattern) generally determine the distance a ball will travel when hit. Since club head speed and the angle of trajectory are factors not easily controllable by a manufacturer, factors of concern among manufacturers are the coefficient of restitution (C.O.R.) and the surface configuration of the ball. [0036]
The coefficient of restitution (C.O.R.) in solid core balls is a function of the composition of the molded core and of the cover. In balls containing a dual core (i.e., balls comprising an interior spherical center component, a core layer disposed about the spherical center component, and a cover), the coefficient of restitution is a function of not only the composition of the cover, but also the composition and physical characteristics of the interior spherical center component and the core layer. Both the dual core and the cover contribute to the coefficient of restitution in the golf balls of the present invention. [0037]
In this regard, the coefficient of restitution of a golf ball is generally measured by propelling a ball at a given speed against a hard surface and measuring the ball's incoming and outgoing velocity electronically. As mentioned above, the coefficient of restitution is the ratio of the outgoing velocity to the incoming velocity. The coefficient of restitution must be carefully controlled in all commercial golf balls in order for the ball to be within the specifications regulated by the United States Golf Association (U.S.G.A.). Along this line, the U.S.G.A. standards indicate that a “regulation” ball cannot have an initial velocity (i.e., the speed of the club) exceeding 255 feet per second. Since the coefficient of restitution of a ball is related to the ball's initial velocity, it is highly desirable to produce a ball having sufficiently high coefficient of restitution to closely approach the U.S.G.A. limit on initial velocity, while having an ample degree of softness (i.e., hardness) to produce enhanced playability (i.e., spin, etc.). [0038]
The hardness of the ball is the second principal property involved in the performance of a golf ball. The hardness of the ball can affect the playability of the ball on striking and the sound or “click” produced. Hardness is determined by the deformation (i.e., compression) of the ball under various load conditions applied across the ball's diameter (i.e., the lower the compression value, the harder the material). As indicated in U.S. Pat. No. 4,674,751, softer covers permit the accomplished golfer to impart increased spin. This is because the softer covers deform on impact significantly more than balls having “harder” ionomeric resin covers. As a result, the better player is allowed to impart fade, draw or backspin to the ball thereby enhancing playability. Such properties may be determined by various spin rate tests. [0039]
It has been found that a hard inner cover layer provides for a substantial increase in resilience (i.e., enhanced distance) over known multi-layer covered balls. The softer outer cover layer provides for desirable “feel” and high spin rate while maintaining respectable resiliency. The soft outer layer allows the cover to deform more during impact and increases the area of contact between the club face and the cover, thereby imparting more spin on the ball. As a result, the soft cover provides the ball with a balata-like feel and playability characteristics with improved distance and durability. [0040]
In addition, the unique multi-layer core configuration, when formed into a finished golf ball according to the present invention, results in a golf ball having enhanced resilience (improved travel distance), durablilty and feel characteristics while maintaining and in many instances, improving the playability properties of the ball. [0041]
The combination of a multi-layer core component and a hard inner cover layer with a soft, relatively low modulus ionomer, ionomer blend or other non-ionomeric thermoplastic elastomer outer cover layer provides for excellent overall coefficient of restitution (i.e., excellent resilience) because of the improved resiliency produced by the inner cover layer. Moreover, the configuration of, and the ability to select the materials used in, the multi-layer core component enables the formulator to readily tailor the end properties and characteristics of the resulting golf ball. While some improvement in resiliency is also produced by the outer cover layer, the outer cover layer generally provides for a more desirable feel and high spin, particularly at lower swing speeds with highly lofted clubs such as half wedge shots. [0042]
In an alternative embodiment, a soft inner cover layer is provided which is covered by a relatively harder outer cover layer. While some of the enhanced “feel” characteristics are sacrificed compared to a soft over hard cover for a golf ball, enhanced distance may be realized by the hard over soft covers. [0043]

A. The Core Layers

Multi-Layer Core [0044]
As noted, the present invention golf balls utilize a unique dual core configuration. Preferably, the cores comprise (i) an interior spherical center component formed from a thermoset material, a thermoplastic material, or combinations thereof and (ii) a core layer disposed about the spherical center component, the core layer formed from a thermoset material, a thermoplastic material, or combinations thereof. Most preferably, the core layer is disposed immediately adjacent to, and in intimate contact with the center component. The cores may further comprise (iii) an optional outer core layer disposed about the core layer. Most preferably, the outer core layer is disposed immediately adjacent to, and in intimate contact with the core layer. The outer core layer may be formed from a thermoset material, a thermoplastic material, or combinations thereof. [0045]
The present invention provides several additionally preferred embodiment golf balls utilizing the unique dual core configuration and the previously described cover layers. Referring to FIG. 2, a preferred [0046] embodiment golf ball 20 is illustrated comprising a core 22 formed from a thermoset material surrounded by a core layer 24 formed from a thermoset material. A multi-layer cover 26, 28 surrounds the core 22 and the core layer 24.
FIG. 3 illustrates yet another preferred [0047] embodiment golf ball 30 in accordance with the present invention. The preferred embodiment golf ball 30 comprises a core 32 formed from a thermoset material. A core layer 34 surrounds the core 32. The core layer 34 is formed form a thermoset material which may be the same as the material utilized for the core 32, or one or mor other or different thermoset materials. The preferred embodiment golf ball 30 utilizes an optional outer core layer 35 that surrounds the core component 32 and the core layer 34. The outer core layer 35 is formed from a thermoplastic or thermoset material. The thermoset material may be the same or different than any of the thermoset materials utilized for the core 32 and the core layer 34. The golf ball 30 further comprises a multi-layer cover 36, 38.
FIG. 4 illustrates yet another preferred [0048] embodiment golf ball 40 in accordance with the present invention is depicted. The preferred embodiment golf ball 40 comprises a core 42 formed from a thermoplastic, thermoset material, or any combination of a thermoset and thermoplastic material. The core layer 44 is formed from a thermoset or thermoplastic material. An additional embodiment golf ball 40 also comprises an optical outer core layer formed form a thermoplastic or thermoset materials as in the golf ball of FIG. 3. A multi-layer cover 46, 48 is disposed about, and generally surrounds, the core 42, the core layer 44 and, if present, the optional outer core.
A wide array of thermoset materials can be utilized in the present invention dual cores. Examples of suitable thermoset materials include butadiene or any natural or synthetic elastomer, including metallocene polyolefins, polyurethanes, silicones, polyamides, polyureas, or virtually any irreversibly cross-linked resin system. It is also contemplated that epoxy, phenolic, and an array of unsaturated polyester resins could be utilized. [0049]
The thermoplastic materials utilized in the present invention golf balls and, particularly their dual cores, may be nearly any thermoplastic material. Examples of typical thermoplastic materials for incorporation in the golf balls of the present invention include, but are not limited to, ionomers, polyurethane thermoplastic elastomers, and combinations thereof. It is also contemplated that a wide array of other thermoplastic materials could be utilized, such as polysulfones, fluoropolymers, polyamide-imides, polyarylates, polyaryletherketones, polyaryl sulfones/polyether sulfones, polybenzimidazoles, polyether-imides, polyimides, liquid crystal polymers, polyphenylene sulfides; and specialty high-performance resins, which would include fluoropolymers, polybenzimidazole, and ultrahigh molecular weight polyethylenes. [0050]
Additional examples of suitable thermoplastics include metallocenes, polyvinyl chlorides, acrylonitrile-butadiene-styrenes, acrylics, styrene-acrylonitriles, styrene-maleic anhydrides, polyamides (nylons), polycarbonates, polybutylene terephthalates, polyethylene terephthalates, polyphenylene ethers/polyphenylene oxides, reinforced polypropylenes, and high-impact polystyrenes. [0051]
Preferably, the thermoplastic materials have relatively high melting points, such as a melting point of at least about 300° F. Several examples of these preferred thermoplastic materials and which are commercially available include, but are not limited to, Capron (a blend of nylon and ionomer, available from Allied Chemical), Lexan (a polycarbonate, available from General Electric), Pebax (a polyether block amide, avaliable from Elf Atochem), and Hytrel (a polyester elastomeric resin, available from DuPont). The polymers or resin system may be cross-linked by a variety of means such as by peroxide agents, sulphur agents, radiation or other cross-linking techniques. [0052]
Any or all of the previously described components in the cores of the golf balls of the present invention may be formed in such a manner, or have suitable fillers added, so that their resulting density is decreased or increased. For example, any of the components in the multi-layer cores could be formed or otherwise produced to be light in weight. For instance, the components could be foamed, either separately or in-situ. Related to this, a foamed light weight filler agent may be added. In contrast, any of these components could be mixed with, or otherwise receive, various high density filler agents or other weighting components such as relatively high density fibers or particulate agents in order to increase their mass or weight. [0053]

The following commercially available thermoplastic resins are particularly preferred for use in the noted dual cores employed in the golf balls of the present invention: Capron 8351 (a blend of nylon and ionomer, available from Allied Signal Plastics), Lexan ML5776 (a polycarbonate, available from General Electric), Pebax 3533 (a polyether block amide, available from Elf Atochem), and Hytrel G4074 (a polyester elastomeric resin, available from DuPont). Properties of these four preferred thermoplastics are set forth below in Tables 1-4. When forming a golf ball in accordance with the present invention, if the interior center component of the dual core is to comprise a thermoplastic material, it is most preferred to utilize Pebax thermoplastic resin.

TABLE 1


CAPRON 8351

	DAM	50% RH	ASTM Test

MECHANICAL
Tensile Strength, Yield,	7,800	(54)	—	D-638
psi (MPa)
Flexural Strength,	9,500	(65)	—	D-790
psi (MPa)
Flexural Modulus,	230,000	(1,585)	—	D-790
psi (MPa)
Ultimate Elongation, %	200		—	D-638

Notched Izod Impact,	No Break	—	D-256
ft-lbs/in (J/M)

Drop Weight Impact,	150	(200)	—	D-3029
ft-lbs (J)
Drop Weight Impact, @	150	(200)	—	D-3029
−40° F., ft-lbs (J)
PHYSICAL
Specific Gravity	1.07		—	D-792
THERMAL
Melting Point, ° F. (° C.)	420	(215)	—	D-789
Heat Deflection @ 264 psi	140	(60)	—	D-648
° F. (° C.)

TABLE 2


Lexan ML5776

PROPERTY	TYPICAL DATA	UNIT	METHOD

MECHANICAL
Tensile Strength,	8500	psi	ASTM D 638
yield,
Type I, 0.125″
Tensile Strength,	9500	psi	ASTM D 638
break,
Type I, 0.125″
Tensile Elongation,	110.0	%	ASTM D 638
yield,
Type I, 0.125″
Flexural Strength,	12000	psi	ASTM D 790
yield,
0.125″
Flexural Modulus,	310000	psi	ASTM D 790
0.125″
IMPACT
Izod Impact, unnotched,	60.0	ft-lb/in	ASTM D 4812
73 F.
Izod Impact, notched,	15.5	ft-lb/in	ASTM D 256
73 F.
Izod Impact, notches,	12.0	ft-lb/in	ASTM D 256
73 F., 0.250″
Instrumented Impact	48.0	ft-lbs	ASTM D 3763
Energy @ Peak, 73 F.
THERMAL
HDT, 264 psi, 0.250″,	257	deg F.	ASTM D 648
unannealed
Thermal Index,	80	deg C.	UL 7468
Elec Prop
Thermal Index,	80	deg C.	UL 7468
Mech Prop with impact
Thermal Index,	80	deg C.	UL 7468
Mech Prop without impact
PHYSICAL
Specific Gravity, solid	1.19	—	ASTM D 792
Water Absorption,	0.150	%	ASTM D 570
24 hours @ 73 F.
Mold shrinkage,	5.7	in/in	ASTM D 955
flow, 0.125″		E-3
Melt Flow Rate, nom'l,	7.5	g/10	ASTM D 1238
300 C./1.2 kgf (0)		min
FLAME
CHARACTERISTICS
UL File Number, USA	E121562	—	—
94HB Rated (tested	0.060	inch	UL 94
thickness)

TABLE 3


PEBAX ® 3533 RESIN

	ASTM
PROPERTY	TEST METHOD	UNITS	3533

Specific Gravity	D792
Water Absorption			0.5
Equilibrium
(2000, 50% R.H.>)
24 Hr. Immersion	D570		1.2
Hardness	D2240		35D
Tensile Strength,	D638	psi	5600
Ultimate
Elongation, Ultimate	D638	%	580
Flexural Modulus	D790	psi	2800
Izod Impact, Notched	D256	ft-lb./in.
20° C.			NB
−40° C.			NB
Abrasion Resistance	D1044	Mg/1000	104
H18/1000 g		Cycles
Tear Resistance Notched	D624C	lb./in.	260
Melting Point	D3418	° F.	306
Vicat Softening Point	D1525	° F.	165
HDT 66 psi	D648	° F.	115
Compression Set	D395A	%	54
(24 hr., 160° F.)

TABLE 4


HYTREL G4074
Thermoplastic Elastomer

PHYSICAL
Sp Gr	ASTM D792	1.1800
Melt Flow	ASTM D1238	5.20	g/10 min
190 C/2.16 kgf
Wat Abs	ASTM D570	2.100%
MECHANICAL
Elong @ Brk	ASTM D638	230.0%
Flex Mod	ASTM D790	9500	psi
TnStr @ Brk	ASTM D638	2000	psi
IMPACT

Notch Izod

ASTM D256

No Break @ 73.0 F. @

0.2500

inft-lb/in

0.50 @ −40.0 F. @

		0.2500	inft-lb/in
HARDNESS

Shore	ASTM D2240		40 Shore D
THERMAL

DTUL @ 66	ASTM D648	122	deg. F.
Melt Point		338.0	deg. F.
Vicat Soft	ASTM D1525	248	deg. F.
Melt Point

The cores of the inventive golf balls typically have a coefficient of restitution of about 0.750 or more, more preferably 0.770 or more and a PGA compression of about 90 or less, and more preferably 70 or less. The cores have a weight of 25-40 grams and preferably 30-40 grams. The core can be compression molded from a slug of uncured or lightly cured elastomer composition comprising a high cis content polybutadiene and a metal salt of an α, β, ethylenically unsaturated carboxylic acid such as zinc mono- or diacrylate or methacrylate. To achieve higher coefficients of restitution and/or to increase hardness in the core, the manufacturer may include a small amount of a metal oxide such as zinc oxide. In addition, larger amounts of metal oxide than are needed to achieve the desired coefficient may be included in order to increase the core weight so that the finished ball more closely approaches the U.S.G.A. upper weight limit of 1.620 ounces. Non-limiting examples of other materials which may be used in the core composition including compatible rubbers or ionomers, and low molecular weight fatty acids such as stearic acid. Free radical initiator catalysts such as peroxides are admixed with the core composition so that on the application of heat and pressure, a curing or cross-linking reaction takes place. [0058]
Wound cores are generally produced by winding a very long elastic thread around a solid or liquid filled balloon center. The elastic thread is wound around the center to produce a finished core of about 1.4 to 1.6 inches in diameter, generally. However, the preferred embodiment golf balls of the present invention preferably utilize a solid core, or rather a solid dual core configuration, as opposed to a wound core. [0059]

B. The Cover Layer(s)

Inner Cover Layer [0060]
The inner cover layer is preferably harder than the outer cover layer and generally has a thickness in the range of 0.01 to 0.10 inches, preferably 0.03 to 0.07 inches for a 1.68 inch ball and 0.05 to 0.10 inches for a 1.72 inch (or more) ball. The core and inner cover layer together form an inner ball having a coefficient of restitution of 0.780 or more and more preferably 0.790 or more, and a diameter in the range of 1.45-1.66 inches for a 1.68 inch ball and 1.50-1.70 inches for a 1.72 inch (or more) ball. The inner cover layer has a Shore D hardness of 60 or more. It is particularly advantageous if the golf balls of the invention have an inner layer with a Shore D hardness of 65 or more. The above-described characteristics of the inner cover layer provide an inner ball having a PGA compression of 100 or less. It is found that when the inner ball has a PGA compression of 90 or less, excellent playability results. [0061]
The inner layer compositions include the high acid ionomers such as those developed by E. I. DuPont de Nemours & Company under the trademark “Surlyn®” and by Exxon Corporation under the trademark “Escor®” or trade name “Iotek”, or blends thereof. Examples of compositions which may be used as the inner layer herein are set forth in detail in a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 08/174,765, which is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 07/776,803 filed Oct. 15, 1991, and Ser. No. 08/493,089, which is a continuation of Ser. No. 07/981,751, which in turn is a continuation of Ser. No. 07/901,660 filed Jun. 19, 1992, all of which are incorporated herein by reference. Of course, the inner layer high acid ionomer compositions are not limited in any way to those compositions set forth in said applications. [0062]
The high acid ionomers which may be suitable for use in formulating the inner layer compositions are ionic copolymers which are the metal, i.e., sodium, zinc, magnesium, etc., salts of the reaction product of an olefin having from about 2 to 8 carbon atoms and an unsaturated monocarboxylic acid having from about 3 to 8 carbon atoms. Preferably, the ionomeric resins are copolymers of ethylene and either acrylic or methacrylic acid. In some circumstances, an additional comonomer such as an acrylate ester (i.e., iso- or n-butylacrylate, etc.) can also be included to produce a softer terpolymer. The carboxylic acid groups of the copolymer are partially neutralized (i.e., approximately 10-100%, preferably 30-70%) by the metal ions. Each of the high acid ionomer resins which may be included in the inner layer cover compositions of the invention contains greater than about 16% by weight of a carboxylic acid, preferably from about 17% to about 25% by weight of a carboxylic acid, more preferably from about 18.5% to about 21.5% by weight of a carboxylic acid. [0063]
Although the inner layer cover composition of several embodiments of the present invention preferably includes a high acid ionomeric resin, the scope of the patent embraces all known high acid ionomeric resins falling within the parameters set forth above. Only a relatively limited number of these high acid ionomeric resins have recently become commercially available. [0064]
The high acid ionomeric resins available from Exxon under the designation “Escor®” and or “Iotek”, are somewhat similar to the high acid ionomeric resins available under the “Surlyn®” trademark. However, since the Escor®/Iotek ionomeric resins are sodium or zinc salts of poly(ethylene-acrylic acid) and the “Surlyn®” resins are zinc, sodium, magnesium, etc. salts of poly(ethylene-methacrylic acid), distinct differences in properties exist. [0065]
Examples of the high acid methacrylic acid based ionomers found suitable for use in accordance with this invention include Surlyn® 8220 and 8240 (both formerly known as forms of Surlyn® AD-8422), Surlyn® 9220 (zinc cation), Surlyn® SEP-503-1 (zinc cation), and Surlyn® SEP-503-2 (magnesium cation). According to DuPont, all of these ionomers contain from about 18.5 to about 21.5% by weight methacrylic acid. [0066]

More particularly, Surlyn® AD-8422 is currently commercially available from DuPont in a number of different grades (i.e., AD-8422-2, AD-8422-3, AD-8422-5, etc.) based upon differences in melt index. According to DuPont, Surlyn® 8422, which is believed recently to have been redesignated as 8220 and 8240, offers the following general properties when compared to Surlyn® 8920, the stiffest, hardest of all on the low acid grades (referred to as “hard” ionomers in U.S. Pat. No. 4,884,814):



	LOW ACID	HIGH ACID
	(15 wt % Acid)	(>20 wt % Acid)

SURLYN ®	SURLYN ®	SURLYN ®
8920	8422-2	8422-3

IONOMER
Cation	Na	Na	Na
Melt Index	1.2	2.8	1.0
Sodium, Wt %	2.3	1.9	2.4
Base Resin MI	60	60	60
MP¹, ° C.	88	86	85
FP¹, ° C.	47	48.5	45
COMPRESSION
MOLDING²
Tensile Break, psi	4350	4190	5330
Yield, psi	2880	3670	3590
Elongation, %	315	263	289
Flex Mod, K psi	53.2	76.4	88.3
Shore D hardness	66	67	68

In comparing Surlyn® 8920 to Surlyn® 8422-2 and Surlyn® 8422-3, it is noted that the high acid Surlyn® 8422-2 and 8422-3 ionomers have a higher tensile yield, lower elongation, slightly higher Shore D hardness and much higher flexural modulus. Surlyn® 8920 contains 15 weight percent methacrylic acid and is 59% neutralized with sodium. [0068]
In addition, Surlyn® SEP-503-1 (zinc cation) and Surlyn® SEP-503-2 (magnesium cation) are high acid zinc and magnesium versions of the Surlyn® AD 8422 high acid ionomers. When compared to the Surlyn® AD 8422 high acid ionomers, the Surlyn® SEP-503-1 and SEP-503-2 ionomers can be defined as follows: [0069]

Surlyn ® Ionomer Ion Melt Index Neutralization %

AD 8422-3 Na 1.0 45

SEP 503-1 Zn 0.8 38

SEP 503-2 Mg 1.8 43
Further, Surlyn® 8162 is a zinc cation ionomer resin containing approximately 20% by weight (i.e., 18.5-21.5% weight) methacrylic acid copolymer that has been 30-70% neutralized. Surlyn® 8162 is currently commercially available from DuPont. [0070]

Examples of the high acid acrylic acid based ionomers suitable for use in the present invention also include the Escor® or Iotek high acid ethylene acrylic acid ionomers produced by Exxon such as Ex 1001, 1002, 959, 960, 989, 990, 1003, 1004, 993, 994. In this regard, Escor® or Iotek 959 is a sodium ion neutralized ethylene-acrylic neutralized ethylene-acrylic acid copolymer. According to Exxon, Ioteks 959 and 960 contain from about 19.0 to 21.0% by weight acrylic acid with approximately 30 to about 70 percent of the acid groups neutralized with sodium and zinc ions, respectively. The physical properties of these high acid acrylic acid based ionomers are set forth in Tables 5 and 6 as follows:

TABLE 5


Physical Properties of Various Ionomers

			ESCOR ®			ESCOR ®
	Ex-		(IOTEK)			(IOTEK)
PROPERTY	1001	Ex1002	959	Ex1003	Ex1004	960

Melt index,	1.0	1.8	2.0	1.1	2.0	1.8
g/10 mm
Cation	Na	Na	Na	Zn	Zn	Zn
Melting	183	183	172	180	180.5	174
Point, ° F.
Vicat	125	125	130	133	131	131
Softening
Point, °F.
Tensile	34.4	22.5	4600	24.8	20.6	3500
@ Break	MPa	MPa	psi	MPa	MPa	psi
Elongation	341	348	325	387	437	430
@ Break, %
Hardness,	63	62	66	54	53	57
Shore D
Flexural	365	380	66,000	147	130	27,000
Modulus	MPa	MPa	psi	MPa	MPa	psi

TABLE 6


Physical Properties of Various Ionomers

PROPERTY	UNITS	EX 989	EX 993	EX 994	EX 990

Melt index	g/10 mm	1.30	1.25	1.32	1.24
Moisture	ppm	482	214	997	654
Cation type	—	Na	Li	K	Zn
M+ content by AAS	wt %	2.74	0.87	4.54	0
Zn content by AAS	wt %	0	0	0	3.16
Density	kg/m³	959	945	976	977
Vicat softening point	° C.	52.5	51	50	55.0
Crystallization point	° C.	40.1	39.8	44.9	54.4
Melting point	° C.	82.6	81.0	80.4	81.0
Tensile at yield	MPa	23.8	24.6	22	16.5
Tensile at break	MPa	32.3	31.1	29.7	23.8
Elongation at break	%	330	260	340	357
1% secant modulus	MPa	389	379	312	205
Flezural modulus	MPa	340	368	303	183
Abrasion resistance	mg	20.0	9.2	15.2	20.5
Hardness Shore D	—	62	62.5	61	56
Zwick Rebound	%	61	63	59	48

Furthermore, as a result of the development by the assignee of this application of a number of new high acid ionomers neutralized to various extents by several different types of metal cations, such as by manganese, lithium, potassium, calcium and nickel cations, several new high acid ionomers and/or high acid ionomer blends besides sodium, zinc and magnesium high acid ionomers or ionomer blends are now available for golf ball cover production. It has been found that these new cation neutralized high acid ionomer blends produce inner cover layer compositions exhibiting enhanced hardness and resilience due to synergies which occur during processing. Consequently, the metal cation neutralized high acid ionomer resins recently produced can be blended to produce substantially higher C.O.R.'s than those produced by the low acid ionomer inner cover compositions presently commercially available. [0073]
More particularly, several new metal cation neutralized high acid ionomer resins have been produced by the inventors by neutralizing, to various extents, high acid copolymers of an alpha-olefin and an alpha, beta-unsaturated carboxylic acid with a wide variety of different metal cation salts. This discovery is the subject matter of U.S. application Ser. No. 08/493,089, incorporated herein by reference. It has been found that numerous new metal cation neutralized high acid ionomer resins can be obtained by reacting a high acid copolymer (i.e., a copolymer containing greater than 16% by weight acid, preferably from about 17 to about 25 weight percent acid, and more preferably about 20 weight percent acid), with a metal cation salt capable of ionizing or neutralizing the copolymer to the extent desired (i.e., from about 10% to 90%). [0074]
The base copolymer is made up of greater than 16% by weight of an alpha, beta-unsaturated carboxylic acid and an alpha-olefin. Optionally, a softening comonomer can be included in the copolymer. Generally, the alpha-olefin has from 2 to 10 carbon atoms and is preferably ethylene, and the unsaturated carboxylic acid is a carboxylic acid having from about 3 to 8 carbons. Examples of such acids include acrylic acid, methacrylic acid, ethacrylic acid, chloroacrylic acid, crotonic acid, maleic acid, fumaric acid, and itaconic acid, with acrylic acid being preferred. [0075]
The softening comonomer that can be optionally included in the inner cover layer for the golf ball of the invention may be selected from the group consisting of vinyl esters of aliphatic carboxylic acids wherein the acids have 2 to 10 carbon atoms, vinyl ethers wherein the alkyl groups contains 1 to 10 carbon atoms, and alkyl acrylates or methacrylates wherein the alkyl group contains 1 to 10 carbon atoms. Suitable softening comonomers include vinyl acetate, methyl acrylate, methyl methacrylate, ethyl acrylate, ethyl methacrylate, butyl acrylate, butyl methacrylate, or the like. [0076]
Consequently, examples of a number of copolymers suitable for use to produce the high acid ionomers included in the present invention include, but are not limited to, high acid embodiments of an ethylene/acrylic acid copolymer, an ethylene/methacrylic acid copolymer, an ethylene/itaconic acid copolymer, an ethylene/maleic acid copolymer, an ethylene/methacrylic acid/vinyl acetate copolymer, an ethylene/acrylic acid/vinyl alcohol copolymer, etc. The base copolymer broadly contains greater than 16% by weight unsaturated carboxylic acid, from about 39% to about 83% by weight ethylene and from 0 to about 40% by weight of a softening comonomer. Preferably, the copolymer contains about 20% by weight unsaturated carboxylic acid and about 80% by weight ethylene. Most preferably, the copolymer contains about 20% acrylic acid with the remainder being ethylene. [0077]

Along these lines, examples of the preferred high acid base copolymers which fulfill the criteria set forth above, are a series of ethylene-acrylic copolymers which are commercially available from The Dow Chemical Company, Midland, Mich., under the “Primacor” designation. These high acid base copolymers exhibit the typical properties set forth below in Table 7.

TABLE 7


Typical Properties of Primacor
Ethylene-Acrylic Acid Copolymers

			MELT	TENSILE	FLEXURAL	VICAT
	PERCENT	DENSITY,	INDEX,	YD. ST	MODULUS	SOFT PT	SHORE D
GRADE	ACID	glcc	g/10 min	(psi)	(psi)	(° C.)	HARDNESS

ASTM		D-792	D-1238	D-638	D-790	D-1525	D-2240
5980	20.0	0.958	300.0	—	4800	43	50
5990	20.0	0.955	1300.0	650	2600	40	42
5990	20.0	0.955	1300.0	650	3200	40	42
5981	20.0	0.960	300.0	900	3200	46	48
5981	20.0	0.960	300.0	900	3200	46	48
5983	20.0	0.958	500.0	850	3100	44	45
5991	20.0	0.953	2600.0	635	2600	38	40

Due to the high molecular weight of the Primacor 5981 grade of the ethylene-acrylic acid copolymer, this copolymer is the more preferred grade utilized in the invention. [0079]
The metal cation salts utilized in the invention are those salts which provide the metal cations capable of neutralizing, to various extents, the carboxylic acid groups of the high acid copolymer. These include acetate, oxide or hydroxide salts of lithium, calcium, zinc, sodium, potassium, nickel, magnesium, and manganese. [0080]
Examples of such lithium ion sources are lithium hydroxide monohydrate, lithium hydroxide, lithium oxide and lithium acetate. Sources for the calcium ion include calcium hydroxide, calcium acetate and calcium oxide. Suitable zinc ion sources are zinc acetate dihydrate and zinc acetate, a blend of zinc oxide and acetic acid. Examples of sodium ion sources are sodium hydroxide and sodium acetate. Sources for the potassium ion include potassium hydroxide and potassium acetate. Suitable nickel ion sources are nickel acetate, nickel oxide and nickel hydroxide. Sources of magnesium include magnesium oxide, magnesium hydroxide, magnesium acetate. Sources of manganese include manganese acetate and manganese oxide. [0081]
The new metal cation neutralized high acid ionomer resins are produced by reacting the high acid base copolymer with various amounts of the metal cation salts above the crystalline melting point of the copolymer, such as at a temperature from about 200° F. to about 500° F., preferably from about 250° F. to about 350° F. under high shear conditions at a pressure of from about 10 psi to 10,000 psi. Other well known blending techniques may also be used. The amount of metal cation salt utilized to produce the new metal cation neutralized high acid based ionomer resins is the quantity which provides a sufficient amount of the metal cations to neutralize the desired percentage of the carboxylic acid groups in the high acid copolymer. The extent of neutralization is generally from about 10% to about 90%. [0082]

As indicated below in Table 8 and more specifically in Example 1 in U.S. application Ser. No. 08/493,089, a number of new types of metal cation neutralized high acid ionomers can be obtained from the above indicated process. These include new high acid ionomer resins neutralized to various extents with manganese, lithium, potassium, calcium and nickel cations. In addition, when a high acid ethylene/acrylic acid copolymer is utilized as the base copolymer component of the invention and this component is subsequently neutralized to various extents with the metal cation salts producing acrylic acid based high acid ionomer resins neutralized with cations such as sodium, potassium, lithium, zinc, magnesium, manganese, calcium and nickel, several new cation neutralized acrylic acid based high acid ionomer resins are produced.

TABLE 8


Metal Cation Neutralized High Acid Ionomers

Formulation	Wt- %	Wt- %	Melt		Shore D
No.	Cation Salt	Neutralization	Index	C.O.R.	Hardness

1(NaOH)	6.98	67.5	0.9	.804	71
2(NaOH)	5.66	54.0	2.4	.808	73
3(NaOH)	3.84	35.9	12.2	.812	69
4(NaOH)	2.91	27.0	17.5	.812	(brittle)
5(MnAc)	19.6	71.7	7.5	.809	73
6(MnAc)	23.1	88.3	3.5	.814	77
7(MnAc)	15.3	53.0	7.5	.810	72
8(MnAc)	26.5	106	0.7	.813	(brittle)
9(LiOH)	4.54	71.3	0.6	.810	74
10(LiOH)	3.38	52.5	4.2	.818	72
11(LiOH)	2.34	35.9	18.6	.815	72
12(KOH)	5.30	36.0	19.3	Broke	70
13(KOH)	8.26	57.9	7.18	.804	70
14(KOH)	10.7	77.0	4.3	.801	67
15(ZnAc)	17.9	71.5	0.2	.806	71
16(ZnAc)	13.9	53.0	0.9	.797	69
17(ZnAc)	9.91	36.1	3.4	.793	67
18(MgAc)	17.4	70.7	2.8	.814	74
19(MgAc)	20.6	87.1	1.5	.815	76
20(MgAc)	13.8	53.8	4.1	.814	74
21(CaAc)	13.2	69.2	1.1	.813	74
22(CaAc)	7.12	34.9	10.1	.808	70
23(MgO)	2.91	53.5	2.5	.813
24(MgO)	3.85	71.5	2.8	.808
25(MgO)	4.76	89.3	1.1	.809
26(MgO)	1.96	35.7	7.5	.815
27(NiAc)	13.04	61.1	0.2	.802	71
28(NiAc)	10.71	48.9	0.5	.799	72
29(NiAc)	8.26	36.7	1.8	.796	69
30(NiAc)	5.66	24.4	7.5	.786	64

When compared to low acid versions of similar cation neutralized ionomer resins, the new metal cation neutralized high acid ionomer resins exhibit enhanced hardness, modulus and resilience characteristics. These are properties that are particularly desirable in a number of thermoplastic fields, including the field of golf ball manufacturing. [0084]
When utilized in the construction of the inner layer of a multi-layered golf ball, it has been found that the new acrylic acid based high acid ionomers extend the range of hardness beyond that previously obtainable while maintaining the beneficial properties (i.e. durability, click, feel, etc.) of the softer low acid ionomer covered balls, such as balls produced utilizing the low acid ionomers disclosed in U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,884,814 and 4,911,451. [0085]
Moreover, as a result of the development of a number of new acrylic acid based high acid ionomer resins neutralized to various extents by several different types of metal cations, such as manganese, lithium, potassium, calcium and nickel cations, several new ionomers or ionomer blends are now available for production of an inner cover layer of a multi-layered golf ball. By using these high acid ionomer resins, harder, stiffer inner cover layers having higher C.O.R.s, and thus longer distance, can be obtained. [0086]
More preferably, it has been found that when two or more of the above-indicated high acid ionomers, particularly blends of sodium and zinc high acid ionomers, are processed to produce the covers of multi-layered golf balls, (i.e., the inner cover layer herein) the resulting golf balls will travel further than previously known multi-layered golf balls produced with low acid ionomer resin covers due to the balls' enhanced coefficient of restitution values. [0087]
The low acid ionomers which may be suitable for use in formulating the inner layer compositions of several of the embodiments of the subject invention are ionic copolymers which are the metal, i.e., sodium, zinc, magnesium, etc., salts of the reaction product of an olefin having from about 2 to 8 carbon atoms and an unsaturated monocarboxylic acid having from about 3 to 8 carbon atoms. Preferably, the ionomeric resins are copolymers of ethylene and either acrylic or methacrylic acid. In some circumstances, an additional comonomer such as an acrylate ester (i.e., iso- or n-butylacrylate, etc.) can also be included to produce a softer terpolymer. The carboxylic acid groups of the copolymer are partially neutralized (i.e., approximately 10-100%, preferably 30-70%) by the metal ions. Each of the low acid ionomer resins which may be included in the inner layer cover compositions of the invention contains 16% by weight of less of a carboxylic acid. [0088]
The inner layer compositions include the low acid ionomers such as those developed and sold by E. I. DuPont de Nemours & Company under the trademark “Surlyn®” and by Exxon Corporation under the trademark “Escor®” or tradename “Iotek,” or blends thereof. [0089]
The low acid ionomer resins available from Exxon under the designation “Escor®” and/or “Iotek,” are somewhat similar to the low acid ionomeric resins available under the “Surlyn®” trademark. However, since the Escor®/Iotek ionomeric resins are sodium or zinc salts of poly(ethylene-acrylic acid) and the “Surlyn®” resins are zinc, sodium, magnesium, etc. salts of poly(ethylene-methacrylic acid), distinct differences in properties exist. [0090]
When utilized in the construction of the inner layer of a multi-layered golf ball, it has been found that the low acid ionomer blends extend the range of compression and spin rates beyond that previously obtainable. More preferably, it has been found that when two or more low acid ionomers, particularly blends of sodium and zinc ionomers, are processed to produce the covers of multi-layered golf balls, (i.e., the inner cover layer herein) the resulting golf balls will travel further and at an enhanced spin rate than previously known multi-layered golf balls. Such an improvement is particularly noticeable in enlarged or oversized golf balls. [0091]
The use of an inner layer formulated from blends of lower acid ionomers produces multi-layer golf balls having enhanced compression and spin rates. These are the properties desired by the more skilled golfer. [0092]
In yet another embodiment of the inner cover layer, a blend of high and low acid ionomer resins is used. These can be the ionomer resins described above, combined in a weight ratio which preferably is within the range of 10:90 to 90:10 parts of high and low acid ionomer resins. [0093]
A further additional embodiment of the inner cover layer is primarily based upon the use of a fully non-ionomeric thermoplastic material. Suitable non-ionomeric materials include metallocene catalyzed polyolefins or polyamides, polyamide/ionomer blends, polyphenylene ether/ionomer blends, etc., which have a shore D hardness of ≧60 and a flex modulus of greater than about 30,000 psi, or other hardness and flex modulus values which are comparable to the properties of the ionomers described above. Other suitable materials include, but are not limited to, thermoplastic or thermosetting polyurethanes, a polyester elastomer such as that marketed by DuPont under the trademark Hytrel®, or a polyester amide such as that marketed by Elf Atochem S.A. under the trademark Pebax®, a blend of two or more non-ionomeric thermoplastic elastomers, or a blend of one or more ionomers and one or more non-ionomeric thermoplastic elastomers. These materials can be blended with the ionomers described above in order to reduce cost relative to the use of higher quantities of ionomer. [0094]
Outer Cover Layer [0095]
While the multi-layer core component described above, and the hard inner cover layer formed thereon, provide the multi-layer golf ball with power and distance, the [0096] outer cover layer 28, as shown in FIG. 2, is comparatively softer than the inner cover layer. However, as noted previously, a hard outer cover over a relatively softer inner cover is contemplated and within the scope of the golf balls described herein. The softness provides for the feel and playability characteristics typically associated with balata or balata-blend balls. The outer cover layer or ply is comprised of a relatively soft, low modulus (about 1,000 psi to about 10,100 psi) and, in an alternate embodiment, low acid (less than 16 weight percent acid) ionomer, an ionomer blend, a non-ionomeric thermoplastic or thermosetting material such as, but not limited to, a metallocene catalyzed polyolefin such as EXACT material available from EXXON, a polyurethane, a polyester elastomer such as that marketed by DuPont under the trademark Hytrel®, or a polyester amide such as that marketed by Elf Atochem S.A. under the trademark Pebax®, a blend of two or more non-ionomeric thermoplastic or thermosetting materials, or a blend of one or more ionomers and one or more non-ionomeric thermoplastic materials. The outer layer is fairly thin (i.e. from about 0.010 to about 0.10 inches in thickness, more desirably 0.03 to 0.06 inches in thickness for a 1.680 inch ball and 0.04 to 0.07 inches in thickness for a 1.72 inch or more ball), but thick enough to achieve desired playability characteristics while minimizing expense. Thickness is defined as the average thickness of the non-dimpled areas of the outer cover layer. The outer cover layer, such as layer 28, has a Shore D hardness of 55 or less, and more preferably 50 or less.
In one embodiment, the outer cover layer preferably is formed from an ionomer which constitutes at least 75 weight % of an acrylate ester-containing ionic copolymer or blend of acrylate ester-containing ionic copolymers. This type of outer cover layer in combination with the multi-layer core and inner cover layer described above results in golf ball covers having a favorable combination of durability and spin rate. The one or more acrylate ester-containing ionic copolymers each contain an olefin, an acrylate ester, and an acid. In a blend of two or more acrylate ester-containing ionic copolymers, each copolymer may contain the same or a different olefin, acrylate ester and acid than are contained in the other copolymers. Preferably, the acrylate ester-containing ionic copolymer or copolymers are terpolymers, but additional monomers can be combined into the copolymers if the monomers do not substantially reduce the scuff resistance or other good playability properties of the cover. [0097]
For a given copolymer, the olefin is selected from the group consisting of olefins having 2 to 8 carbon atoms, including, as non-limiting examples, ethylene, propylene, butene-1, hexene-1 and the like. Preferably the olefin is ethylene. [0098]
The acrylate ester is an unsaturated monomer having from 1 to 21 carbon atoms which serves as a softening comonomer. The acrylate ester preferably is methyl, ethyl, n-propyl, n-butyl, n-octyl, 2-ethylhexyl, or 2-methoxyethyl 1-acrylate, and most preferably is methyl acrylate or n-butyl acrylate. Another suitable type of softening comonomer is an alkyl vinyl ether selected from the group consisting of n-butyl, n-hexyl, 2-ethylhexyl, and 2-methoxyethyl vinyl ethers. [0099]
The acid is a mono- or dicarboxylic acid and preferably is selected from the group consisting of methacrylic, acrylic, ethacrylic, α-chloroacrylic, crotonic, maleic, fumaric, and itaconic acid, or the like, and half esters of maleic, fumaric and itaconic acid, or the like. The acid group of the copolymer is 10-100% neutralized with any suitable cation, for example, zinc, sodium, magnesium, lithium, potassium, calcium, manganese, nickel, chromium, tin, aluminum, or the like. It has been found that particularly good results are obtained when the neutralization level is about 50-100%. [0100]
The one or more acrylate ester-containing ionic copolymers each has an individual Shore D hardness of about 5-64. The overall Shore D hardness of the outer cover is 55 or less, and generally is 40-55. It is preferred that the overall Shore D hardness of the outer cover is in the range of 40-50 in order to impart particularly good playability characteristics to the ball. [0101]
The outer cover layer of the invention is formed over a core to result in a golf ball having a coefficient of restitution of at least 0.770, more preferably at least 0.780, and most preferably at least 0.790. The coefficient of restitution of the ball will depend upon the properties of both the core and the cover. The PGA compression of the golf ball is 100 or less, and preferably is 90 or less. [0102]

The acrylate ester-containing ionic copolymer or copolymers used in the outer cover layer can be obtained by neutralizing commercially available acrylate ester-containing acid copolymers such as polyethylene-methyl acrylate-acrylic acid terpolymers, including ESCOR ATX (Exxon Chemical Company) or poly (ethylene-butyl acrylate-methacrylic acid) terpolymers, including NUCREL (DuPont Chemical Company). Particularly preferred commercially available materials include ATX 320, ATX 325, ATX 310, ATX 350, and blends of these materials with NUCREL 010 and NUCREL 035. The acid groups of these materials and blends are neutralized with one or more of various cation salts including zinc, sodium, magnesium, lithium, potassium, calcium, manganese, nickel, etc. The degree of neutralization ranges from 10-100%. Generally, a higher degree of neutralization results in a harder and tougher cover material. The properties of non-limiting examples of commercially available un-neutralized acid terpolymers which can be used to form the golf ball outer cover layers of the invention are provided below in Table 9.

TABLE 9


Properties of Un-Neutralized Acid Terpolymers

	Melt Index		Flex
	dg/min	Acid No.	Modulus MPa	Hardness
Trade Name	ASTM D 1238	% KOH/g	(ASTM D790)	(Shore D)

ATX 310	6	45	80	44
ATX 320	5	45	50	34
ATX 325	20	45	9	30
ATX 350	6	15	20	28
Nucrel 010	11	60	40	40
Nucrel 035	35	60	59	40

The ionomer resins used to form the outer cover layers can be produced by reacting the acrylate ester-containing acid copolymer with various amounts of the metal cation salts at a temperature above the crystalline melting point of the copolymer, such as a temperature from about 200° F. to about 500° F., preferably from about 250° F. to about 350° F., under high shear conditions at a pressure of from about 100 psi to 10,000 psi. Other well known blending techniques may also be used. The amount of metal cation salt utilized to produce the neutralized ionic copolymers is the quantity which provides a sufficient amount of the metal cations to neutralize the desired percentage of the carboxylic acid groups in the high acid copolymer. When two or more different copolymers are to be used, the copolymers can be blended before or after neutralization. Generally, it is preferable to blend the copolymers before they are neutralized to provide for optimal mixing. [0104]
The compatibility of the acrylate ester-containing copolymers with each other in a copolymer blend produces a golf ball outer cover layer having a surprisingly good scuff resistance for a given hardness of the outer cover layer. The golf ball according to the invention has a scuff resistance of no higher than 3.0. It is preferred that the golf ball has a scuff resistance of no higher than about 2.5 to ensure that the golf ball is scuff resistant when used in conjunction with a variety of types of clubs, including sharp-grooved irons, which are particularly inclined to result in scuffing of golf ball covers. The best results according to the invention are obtained when the outer cover layer has a scuff resistance of no more than about 2.0. [0105]
Additional materials may also be added to the inner and outer cover layer of the present invention as long as they do not substantially reduce the playability properties of the ball. Such materials include dyes (for example, Ultramarine Blue sold by Whitaker, Clark, and Daniels of South Plainsfield, N.J.) (see U.S. Pat. No. 4,679,795), pigments such as titanium dioxide, zinc oxide, barium sulfate and zinc sulfate; UV absorbers; antioxidants; antistatic agents; optical brighteners; and stabilizers. Moreover, the cover compositions of the present invention may also contain softening agents such as those disclosed in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,312,857 and 5,306,760, including plasticizers, metal stearates, processing acids, etc., and reinforcing materials such as glass fibers and inorganic fillers, as long as the desired properties produced by the golf ball covers of the invention are not impaired. [0106]
The outer layer, in another embodiment of the invention, includes a blend of a soft (low acid) ionomer resin with a small amount of a hard (high acid) ionomer resin. A low modulus ionomer suitable for use in the outer layer blend has a flexural modulus measuring from about 1,000 to about 10,000 psi, with a hardness of about 20 to about 40 on the Shore D scale. A high modulus ionomer herein is one which measures from about 15,000 to about 70,000 psi as measured in accordance with ASTM method D-790. The hardness may be defined as at least 50 on the Shore D scale as measured in accordance with ASTM method D-2240. [0107]
Soft ionomers primarily are used in formulating the hard/soft blends of the cover compositions. These ionomers include acrylic acid and methacrylic acid based soft ionomers. They are generally characterized as comprising sodium, zinc, or other mono- or divalent metal cation salts of a terpolymer of an olefin having from about 2 to 8 carbon atoms, methacrylic acid, acrylic acid, or another, α, β-unsaturated carboxylic acid, and an unsaturated monomer of the acrylate ester class having from 1 to 21 carbon atoms. The soft ionomer is preferably made from an acrylic acid base polymer is an unsaturated monomer of the acrylate ester class. [0108]
Certain ethylene-acrylic acid based soft ionomer resins developed by the Exxon Corporation under the designation “Iotek 7520” (referred to experimentally by differences in neutralization and melt indexes as LDX 195, LDX 196, LDX 218 and LDX 219) may be combined with known hard ionomers such as those indicated above to produce the inner and outer cover layers. The combination produces higher C.O.R.s at equal or softer hardness, higher melt flow (which corresponds to improved, more efficient molding, i.e., fewer rejects) as well as significant cost savings versus the outer layer of multi-layer balls produced by other known hard-soft ionomer blends as a result of the lower overall raw materials cost and improved yields. [0109]

While the exact chemical composition of the resins to be sold by Exxon under the designation Iotek 7520 is considered by Exxon to be confidential and proprietary information, Exxon's experimental product data sheet lists the following physical properties of the ethylene acrylic acid zinc ionomer developed by Exxon:

TABLE 10


Physical Properties of Iotek 7520

	ASTM		Typical
Property	Method	Units	Value

Melt Index	D-1238	g/10 min.	2
Density	D-1505	kg/m³	0.962
Cation			Zinc
Melting Point	D-3417	° C.	66
Crystallization Point	D-3417	° C.	49
Vicat Softening Point	D-1525	° C.	42
Plaque Properties (2 mm thick
Compression Molded Plaques)
Tensile at Break	D-638	MPa		10
Yield Point	D-638	MPa	None
Elongation at Break	D-638	%	760
1% Secant Modulus	D-638	MPa		22
Shore D Hardness	D-2240		32
Flexural Modulus	D-790	MPa		26
Zwick Rebound	ISO 4862	%	52
De Mattia Flex Resistance	D-430	Cycles	>5000

In addition, test data collected by the inventors indicates that Iotek 7520 resins have Shore D hardnesses of about 32 to 36 (per ASTM D-2240), melt flow indexes of 3±0.5 g/10 min (at 190° C. per ASTM D-1288), and a flexural modulus of about 2500-3500 psi (per ASTM D-790). Furthermore, testing by an independent testing laboratory by pyrolysis mass spectrometry indicates that Iotek 7520 resins are generally zinc salts of a terpolymer of ethylene, acrylic acid, and methyl acrylate. [0111]
Furthermore, the inventors have found that a newly developed grade of an acrylic acid based soft ionomer available from the Exxon Corporation under the designation Iotek 7510 is also effective when combined with the hard ionomers indicated above in producing golf ball covers exhibiting higher C.O.R. values at equal or softer hardness than those produced by known hard-soft ionomer blends. In this regard, Iotek 7510 has the advantages (i.e. improved flow, higher C.O.R. values at equal hardness, increased clarity, etc.) produced by the Iotek 7520 resin when compared to the methacrylic acid base soft ionomers known in the art (such as the Surlyn® 8625 and Surlyn® 8629 combinations disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 4,8884,814). [0112]
In addition, Iotek 7510, when compared to Iotek 7520, produces slightly higher C.O.R. values at equal softness/hardness due to the Iotek 7510's higher hardness and neutralization. Similarly, Iotek 7510 produces better release properties (from the mold cavities) due to its slightly higher stiffness and lower flow rate than Iotek 7520. This is important in production where the soft covered balls tend to have lower yields caused by sticking in the molds and subsequent punched pin marks from the knockouts. [0113]

According to Exxon, Iotek 7510 is of similar chemical composition as Iotek 7520 (i.e. a zinc salt of a terpolymer of ethylene, acrylic acid, and methyl acrylate) but is more highly neutralized. Based upon FTIR analysis, Iotek 7520 is estimated to be about 30-40 wt. % neutralized and Iotek 7510 is estimated to be about 40-60 wt. % neutralized. The typical properties of Iotek 7510 in comparison of those of Iotek 7520 in comparison of those of Iotek 7520 are set forth below:

TABLE 11


Physical Properties of Iotek 7510
in Comparison to Iotek 7520

	IOTEK 7520	IOTEK 7510

MI, g/10 min	2.0	0.8
Density, g/cc	0.96	0.97
Melting Point, ° F.	151	149
Vicat Softening Point, ° F.	108	109
Flex Modulus, psi	3800	5300
Tensile Strength, psi	1450	1750
Elongation, %	760	690
Hardness, Shore D	32	35

The hard ionomer resins utilized to produce the outer cover layer composition hard/soft blends include ionic copolymers which are the sodium, zinc, magnesium, lithium, etc. salts of the reaction product of an olefin having from 2 to 8 carbon atoms and an unsaturated monocarboxylic acid having from 3 to 8 carbon atoms. The carboxylic acid groups of the copolymer may be totally or partially (i.e. approximately 15-75 percent) neutralized. [0115]
The hard ionomeric resins are likely copolymers of ethylene and acrylic and/or methacrylic acid, with copolymers of ethylene and acrylic acid being the most preferred. Two or more types of hard ionomeric resins may be blended into the outer cover layer compositions in order to produce the desired properties of the resulting golf balls. [0116]
As discussed earlier herein, the hard ionomeric resins introduced under the designation Escor® and sold under the designation “Iotek” are somewhat similar to the hard ionomeric resins sold under the Surlyn® trademark. However, since the “Iotek” ionomeric resins are sodium or zinc salts of poly(ethylene-acrylic acid) and the Surlyn® resins are zinc or sodium salts of poly(ethylene-methacrylic acid) some distinct differences in properties exist. As more specifically indicated in the data set forth below, the hard “Iotek” resins (i.e., the acrylic acid based hard ionomer resins) are the more preferred hard resins for use in formulating the outer layer blends for use in the present invention. In addition, various blends of “Iotek” and Surlyn® hard ionomeric resins, as well as other available ionomeric resins, may be utilized in the present invention in a similar manner. [0117]

Examples of commercially available hard Monomeric resins which may be used in the present invention in formulating the outer cover blends include the hard sodium ionic copolymer sold under the trademark Surlyn® 8940 and the hard zinc ionic copolymer sold under the trademark Surlyn® 9910. Surlyn® 8940 is a copolymer of ethylene with methacrylic acid and about 15 weight percent acid which is about 29 percent neutralized with sodium ions. This resin has an average melt flow index of about 2.8. Surlyn® 9910 is a copolymer of ethylene and methacrylic acid with about 15 weight percent acid which is about 58 percent neutralized with zinc ions. The average melt flow index of Surlyn® 9910 is about 0.7. The typical properties of Surlyn® 9910 and 8940 are set forth below in Table 12:

TABLE 12


Typical Properties of Commercially Available Hard
Surlvn ® Resins Suitable for Use in the Outer Layer
Blends of the Present Invention

	ASTM D	8940	9910	8920	8528	9970	9730

Cation Type		Sodium	Zinc	Sodium	Sodium	Zinc	Zinc
Melt flow index,	D-1238	2.8	0.7	0.9	1.3	14.0	1.6
gms/10 min.
Specific Gravity,	D-792	0.95	0.97	0.95	0.94	0.95	0.95
g/cm³
Hardness, Shore D	D-2240	66	64	66	60	62	63
Tensile Strength,	D-638	(4.8)	(3.6)	(5.4)	(4.2)	(3.2)	(4.1)
(kpsi), MPa		33.1	24.8	37.2	29.0	22.0	28.0
Elongation, %	D-638	470	290	350	450	460	460
Flexural Modulus,	D-790	(51)	(48)	(55)	(32)	(28)	(30)
(kpsi) MPa		350	330	380	220	190	210
Tensile Impact (23° C.)	D-1822S	1020	1020	865	1160	760	1240
KJ/m²(ft. - lbs./in²)		(485)	(485)	(410)	(550)	(360)	(590)
Vicat Temperature, ° C.	D-1525	63	62	58	73	61	73

Examples of the more pertinent acrylic acid based hard ionomer resin suitable for use in the present outer cover composition sold under the “Iotek” trade name by the Exxon Corporation include Iotek 8000, 8010, 8020, 8030, 7030, 7010, 7020, 1002, 1003, 959 and 960. The physical properties of Iotek 959 and 960 are shown above. The typical properties of the remainder of these and other Iotek hard ionomers suited for use in formulating the outer layer cover composition are set forth below in Table 13:

TABLE 13


Typical Properties of Iotek Ionomers

	ASTM
	Method	Units	4000	4010	8000	8020	8030	7010	7020	7030

Resin
Properties
Cation type			zinc	zinc	sodium	sodium	sodium	zinc	zinc	zinc
Melt index	D-1238	g/10 min.	2.5	1.5	0.8	1.6	2.8	0.8	1.5	2.5
Density	D-1505	kg/m³	963	963	954	960	960	960	960	960
Melting Point	D-3417	° C.	90	90	90	87.5	87.5	90	90	90
Crystallization Point	D-3417	° C.	62	64	56	53	55	—	—	—
Vicat Softening Point	D-1525	° C.	62	63	61	64	67	60	63	62.5
% Weight Acrylic Acid			16		11			—	—	—
% of Acid Groups			30		40			—	—	—
cation neutralized
Plaque
Properties
(3 mm thick,
compression molded)
Tensile at break	D-638	MPa	24	26	36	31.5	28	38	38	38
Yield point	D-638	MPa	none	none	21	21	23	none	none	none
Elongation at break	D-638	%	395	420	350	410	395	500	420	395
1% Secant modulus	D-638	MPa	160	160	300	350	390	—	—	—
Shore Hardness D	D-2240	—	55	55	61	58	59	57	55	55
Film Properties
(50 micron film 2.2:1
Blow-up ratio)
Tensile at Break MD	D-882	MPa	41	39	42	52	47.4
TD	D-882	MPa	37	38	38	38	40.5
Yield point MD	D-882	MPa	15	17	17	23	21.6
TD	D-882	MPa	14	15	15	21	20.7
Elongation at Break MD	D-882	%	310	270	260	295	305
TD	D-882	%	360	340	280	340	345
1% Secant modulus MD	D-882	MPa	210	215	390	380	380
TD	D-882	MPa	200	225	380	350	345
Dart Drop Impact	D-1709	g/micron	12.4	12.5	20.3

It has been determined that when hard/soft ionomer blends are used for the outer cover layer, good results are achieved when the relative combination is in a range of about 3-25 percent hard ionomer and about 75-97 percent soft ionomer. [0120]
Additionally, it is contemplated that the above described hard ionomers may be utilized as the outer cover layer over a relatively softer ionomeric material as the inner cover layer. [0121]

Moreover, in alternative embodiments, the outer cover layer formulation may also comprise up to 100 wt % of a soft, low modulus non-ionomeric thermoplastic material including a polyester polyurethane such as B. F. Goodrich Company's Estane® polyester polyurethane X-4517. The non-ionomeric thermoplastic material may be blended with a soft ionomer. For example, polyamides blend well with soft ionomer. According to B. F. Goodrich, Estane® X-4517 has the following properties:



Properties of Estane ® X-4517

	Tensile	1430
	100%	815
	200%	1024
	300%	1193
	Elongation	641
	Youngs Modulus	1826
	Hardness A/D	88/39
	Bayshore Rebound	59
	Solubility in Water	Insoluble
	Melt processing temperature	>350° F. (>177° C.)
	Specific Gravity (H₂O = 1)	1.1-1.3

Other soft, relatively low modulus non-ionomeric thermoplastic elastomers may also be utilized to produce the outer cover layer as long as the non-ionomeric thermoplastic elastomers produce the playability and durability characteristics desired without adversely effecting the enhanced travel distance characteristic produced by the high acid ionomer resin composition. These include, but are not limited to thermoplastic polyurethanes such as Texin thermoplastic polyurethanes from Mobay Chemical Co. and the Pellethane thermoplastic polyurethanes from Dow Chemical Co.; non-ionomeric thermoset polyurethanes including but not limited to those disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,334,673; cross-linked metallocene catalyzed polyolefins; ionomer/rubber blends such as those in Spalding U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,986,545; 5,098,105 and 5,187,013; and, Hytrel polyester elastomers from DuPont and Pebax polyesteramides from Elf Atochem S.A. [0123]

C. Method of Making Golf Balls

In preparing preferred embodiment golf balls in accordance with the present invention, a hard inner cover layer is molded (by injection molding or by compression molding) about a core (preferably a multi-layer, solid core). A comparatively softer outer layer is molded over the inner cover layer. This may, however, be reversed (hard outer over soft inner) wherein maximum distances can be achieved. [0124]
The dual cores of the present invention are preferably formed by compression molding techniques. However, it is fully contemplated that liquid injection molding or transfer molding techniques could be utilized. [0125]
For purposes of example, a preferred method of making a golf ball according to the invention as follows. Specifically, a thermoset material, i.e. a core layer, is formed about an inner core component comprising a thermoplastic material as follows. Referring to FIG. 5, preforms [0126] 55 of a thermoset material, i.e. utilized to form the core layer 24, are preheated in an oven for one-half hour at 170° F. and placed in the bottom 53 of a molding assembly 50. A Teflon-coated plate 56 with two hemispheres 57 and 58, each about 0.840 inches in diameter, is placed on top of the preforms. Additional preforms, preheated as described above, are placed in the corresponding cavities of a top mold 52. The bottom mold 53 is engaged with the top mold 52 and the assembly flipped or otherwise inverted. The bottom one half of the mold assembly 50 then becomes the top one half of the mold assembly. The mold assembly 50 is then placed in a press and cold formed at room temperature using approximately 10 tons of pressure in a steam press. The molding assembly 50 is closed for approximately two minutes and pressure released. The molding assembly 50 is then opened and the Teflon plate 56 is removed thereby leaving one or more essentially perfectly formed one-half shells or cavities in the thermoset material. Previously formed thermoplastic core centers are then placed in the bottom cavities and the top portion 52 of the molding assembly 50 is placed on the bottom 53 and the materials disposed therebetween cured. The golf ball produced by this method had an inner core diameter of 0.840 inches in diameter. The outer core diameter had a final diameter of 1.470 inches, and a pre-mold diameter of 1.490 inches. A relatively hard inner cover layer is then molded about the resulting dual core component. The diameter of the inner cover was 1.570 inches. A comparatively softer outer cover layer is then molded about the inner cover layer. The outer cover diameter was 1.680 inches. Details of molding the inner and outer covers are set forth below.

Most preferably, the resulting golf balls in accordance with the present invention have the following dimensions:



	Size Specifications:

	Preferred	Most Preferred

Inner Core	Max.	1.250″	1.00″
	Min.	0.500″	0.70″
Outer Core	Max.	1.600″	1.570″
	Min.	1.500″	1.550″
Cover Thickness
(Total)
	Max.	0.090″	0.065″
	Min.	0.040″	0.055″

In a particularly preferred embodiment of the invention, the golf ball has a dimple pattern which provides coverage of 65% or more. The golf ball typically is coated with a durable, abrasion-resistant, relatively non-yellowing finish coat. [0128]
The various cover composition layers of the present invention may be produced according to conventional melt blending procedures. Generally, the copolymer resins are blended in a Banbury type mixer, two-roll mill, or extruder prior to neutralization. After blending, neutralization then occurs in the melt or molten states in the Banbury mixer. Mixing problems are minimal because preferably more than 75 wt %, and more preferably at least 80 wt % of the ionic copolymers in the mixture contain acrylate esters and, in this respect, most of the polymer chains in the mixture are similar to each other. The blended composition is then formed into slabs, pellets, etc., and maintained in such a state until molding is desired. Alternatively, a simple dry blend of the pelletized or granulated resins which have previously been neutralized to a desired extent and colored master batch may be prepared and fed directly into the injection molding machine where homogenization occurs in the mixing section of the barrel prior to injection into the mold. If necessary, further additives such as an inorganic filler, etc., may be added and uniformly mixed before initiation of the molding process. A similar process is utilized to formulate the high acid ionomer resin compositions used to produce the inner cover layer. In one embodiment of the invention, a master batch of non-acrylate ester-containing ionomer with pigments and other additives incorporated therein is mixed with the acrylate ester-containing copolymers in a ratio of about 1-7 weight % master batch and 93-99 weight % acrylate ester-containing copolymer. [0129]
The golf balls of the present invention can be produced by molding processes which include but are not limited to those which are currently well known in the golf ball art. For example, the golf balls can be produced by injection molding or compression molding the novel cover compositions around a wound or solid molded core to produce an inner ball which typically has a diameter of about 1.50 to 1.67 inches. The core, preferably of a dual core configuration, may be formed as previously described. The outer layer is subsequently molded over the inner layer to produce a golf ball having a diameter of 1.620 inches or more, preferably about 1.680 inches or more. Although either solid cores or wound cores can be used in the present invention, as a result of their lower cost and superior performance solid molded cores are preferred over wound cores. The standards for both the minimum diameter and maximum weight of the balls are established by the United States Golf Association (U.S.G.A.). [0130]
In compression molding, the inner cover composition is formed via injection at about 380° F. to about 450° F. into smooth surfaced hemispherical shells which are then positioned around the core in a mold having the desired inner cover thickness and subjected to compression molding at 200° to 300° F. for about 2 to 10 minutes, followed by cooling at 50°to 70° F. for about 2 to 7 minutes to fuse the shells together to form a unitary intermediate ball. In addition, the intermediate balls may be produced by injection molding wherein the inner cover layer is injected directly around the core placed at the center of an intermediate ball mold for a period of time in a mold temperature of from 50° to about 100° F. Subsequently, the outer cover layer is molded around the core and the inner layer by similar compression or injection molding techniques to form a dimpled golf ball of a diameter of 1.680 inches or more. [0131]
After molding, the golf balls produced may undergo various further processing steps such as buffing, painting and marking as disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 4,911,451. [0132]
The resulting golf ball produced from the hard inner layer and the relatively softer, low flexural modulus outer layer provide for an improved multi-layer golf ball having a unique dual core configuration which provides for desirable coefficient of restitution and durability properties while at the same time offering the feel and spin characteristics associated with soft balata and balata-like covers of the prior art. [0133]

EXAMPLES

Four (4) golf balls in accordance with the present invention were formed, each using a preferred and commercially available high melting point thermoplastic material as an inner core component. In this regard, Capron 8351 is a blend of nylon and ionomer, (available from Allied Signal Plastics), Lexan ML5776 is a polycarbonate, (available from General Electric), Pebax 3533 is a polyether block amide, (available from Elf Atochem), and Hytrel G4074 is a polyester elastomeric resin, (available from DuPont). Table 14, set forth below, summarizes these balls.

TABLE 14


	Example 1	Example 2	Example 3	Example 4	Example 5
	Capron	Lexan	Pebax	Hytrel	Control
	8351	ML 5776-7539	3533	G-4074	(Single Core)

Inner Core	size (inches)	0.835	0.854	0.840	0.831	—
	weight (grams)	5.33	6.14	5.08	5.81	—
	rebound % (100″)	78	83	65	61	—
	Shore C (surface)	—	—	57	73	—
	Shore D (surface)	75	83	36	47	—
Outer Core	Cis 1,4 Polybutadiene	100	100	100	100	100
Formulation	Zinc oxide	27	26	28	21	25
	Zinc stearate	16	16	16	16	15
	Zinc diacrylate	20	20	24	24	18
	231 XL¹	0.9	0.9	0.9	0.9	0.9
		163.9	162.9	168.9	161.9	158.9
Double Core	size (inches)	1.561	1.560	1.562	1.563	1.562
Properties	weight (grams)	37.7	37.8	37.8	37.5	37.8
	compression (Riehle)	79	80	99	93	114
	COR	.689	.603	.756	.729	.761
Molded Ball	size (inches	1.685	1.683	1.682	1.683	1.685
Properties	weight (grams)	45.3	45.5	45.5	45.2	45.4
	compression (Riehle)	78	80	89	87	102
	COR	.750	.667	.785	.761	.788
Cover Stock	Surlyn 8940	22
(used on all	Surlyn 9910	54.5
above balls)	Surlyn 8320	10
	Surlyn 8120	4
	T.G. MB²	9.5
		100.0

¹231 XL is a peroxy ketal manufactured by Attochem.

²T.G. MB is as follows:	Iotek 7030	75.35%
	Unitane 0-110	23.90%
	Ultra Marine Blue	0.46%
	Eastonbrite OB-1	0.26%
	Santonox R	0.03%
		100.00

Generally, the inner cover layer which is molded over the core, or preferably a dual core component, is about 0.01 inches to about 0.10 inches in thickness, preferably about 0.03-0.07 inches thick. The inner ball which includes the core and inner cover layer preferably has a diameter in the range of 1.25 to 1.60 inches. The outer cover layer is about 0.01 inches to about 0.10 inches in thickness. Together, the core, the inner cover layer and the outer cover layer combine to form a ball having a diameter of 1.680 inches or more, the minimum diameter permitted by the rules of the United States Golf Association and weighing no more than 1.62 ounces. [0135]
In a similar fashion to that described above, a golf ball according to FIG. 2, for example, having a [0136] thermoset core 22 and a thermoset core layer 24 can be formed. Typically, the thermoset core 22 will have a diameter of about 1.340 to about 1.400 inches. The thermoset core layer 24 typically will have a thickness of about 0.020 inches to about 0.100 inches. The outer diameter of the multi-layer core will typically have a diameter of about 1.440 inches to about 1.500 inches. about 0.020 inches to about 0.100 inches. A cover layer is then formed on the multi-layer core. The cover layer has an inner layer and an outer layer. The inner layer is typically formed from a relatively hard material (compared to the outer layer) while the outer layer is typically formed from a relatively softer material. However, a softer inner layer with a harder outer layer is also contemplated depending upon the desired final properties of the golf ball. The inner cover will typically have a thickness of about 0.020 inches to about 0.080 inches while the outer cover will typically have a thickness of about 0.040 inches to about 0.090 inches. The diameter of the golf ball with the inner cover formed thereon is typically about 1.540 inches to about 1.600 inches. The diameter of the golf ball with the outer cover formed thereon is about 1.680 inches to about 1.720 inches. Typically, the inner core will have a Shore C hardness value of about 50 to about 85 while the core layer which is harder than the inner core will have a Shore D hardness value of about 40 to about 80. The specific gravity of each of the inner core and outer core layers is typically ≧0.1.

The following in Table 15, describes a multi-layer golf ball core with a thermoset inner core and a thermoset core layer in accordance with the present invention.

TABLE 15


Example 6

	Inner Core	Core Layer

Cariflex BR-1220¹	70	70
Taktene 220²	30	30
ZnO	32.8	7
T.G. Regrind	16
Zn Stearate	16	16
ZDA	19	55
231 XL³	0.9	0.9
	184.7	178.9

Diameter	1.370″	1.470″
Specific Gravity	1.215	1.212

The above multi-layer core is then covered with a relatively hard, high acid (i.e. >16% acid) ionomer resin mantle (0.05″ in thickness) which is then covered with a relatively softer ionomeric resin material to form a golf ball having a diameter of 1.680″. [0138]

Example 7



	Inner Core	Core Layer

Cariflex BR-1220	70	70
Taktene 220	30	30
ZnO	6	6
Zn Stearate	15	15
ZDA	20	23
Tungsten Powder	114
231 XL	0.9	0.9
	255.9	144.9

Diameter	.840″	1.50″
Specific Gravity	1.842	1.079

The above inner core and core layer are formed into golf ball dual core having the following properties: [0140]

Dual Core from Example 7 Inner Core and Core Layer

[0141]

Size 1.470″

Weight 32.8 g

Compression (Riehle) 113 (PGA 47)

C.O.R. .766
The above dual core is then covered with a multi-layer ionomeric cover having a relatively hard inner layer and a relatively soft cover layer. This is the same type of cover currently used in the Top Flite® Strata[0142]
golf ball. The finished golf balls had the following properties:

Finished Dual Core/Dual Cover Golf Balls

[0143]

Size 1.685″

Weight 45.78 g

Compression (Riehle) 89 (PGA 71)

C.O.R. .779
Five finished balls according to the above description were tested to 300 blows with no fractures resulting. In addition, the following results were obtained by comparing distance of a STRATA[0144]
golf ball with the golf balls prepared according to Example 7. Each Example represents an average for 12 (twelve)balls hit.

Diff.* Trajectory Carry* Roll* Total Dist.* Total

Distance Comparison (TFT 5 iron @ 126.6 fps)

STRATA
90 24.4° 175.8 4.5 180.2 −4.10

Example 7 ball 24.9° 179.5 4.8 184.3 0.00

(dual core/

dual cover)

Distance Comparison (10° Striker @ 135 fps)

STRATA
90 15.0° 250.7 5.2 255.8 −2.50

Example 7 ball 15.4° 252.8 5.4 258.3 0.00

(dual core/

dual cover)
As can be seen from the above results, an increase in distance can be realized from the dual core golf ball according to the invention over a single core golf ball having essentially the same cover (i.e. the STRATA[0145]
90).
Further, the spin rate of the dual core/dual cover golf balls according to Example 7 were tested and compared to the STRATA[0146]
90 golf balls. The spin tests were conducted with a Miya driving machine set up with a Top Flite Tour 9 iron.

Spin Test Comparison

[0147]

STRATA
90 (125 fps) 23.9 139.7 9273

Example 7 (125 fps) 24.6 139.9 9038

STRATA
90 (60 fps) 27.5 57.7 5397 0.444

Example 7 (60 fps) 28.0 57.8 5367 0.421
As can be seen from the above test, distance can be increased from the dual core/dual cover golf ball compared to the single core/dual cover STRATA[0148]
90 golf ball with little sacrifice in spin rate. This results in an increased distance golf ball which has the desired control and feel of a high spin golf ball.
The invention has been described with reference to the preferred embodiments. Obviously, modifications and alterations will occur to others upon a reading and understanding the preceding detailed description. It is intended that the invention be construed as including all such modifications and alterations in so far as they come within the scope of the appended claims or the equivalents thereof. [0149]

Claims

What is claimed is:

1. A golf ball comprising:

a multi-layer core comprising a center component and a core layer disposed about said center component;

wherein said center component comprises a thermoset material and said core layer comprises a thermoset material; and,

a cover layer disposed about said multi-layer core;

wherein said cover layer includes at least one of (i) a multi-layer cover comprising an inner cover layer having a Shore D hardness of 65 or greater and an outer cover layer having a Shore D hardness of 65 or less, said inner cover layer being harder than said outer cover layer, (ii) a multi-layer cover comprising an inner cover layer having a Shore D hardness of 65 or less and an outer cover layer of 65 or greater, wherein said inner cover layer is softer than said outer cover layer, (iii) a single non-ionomeric outer cover layer having a Shore D hardness of from about 40 to 80, and (iv) a single ionomeric outer cover layer having a Shore D hardness of at least 56.

2. The golf ball of claim 1 wherein the outer cover layer is selected from multi-layer cover (i) or multi-layer cover (ii).

3. The golf ball of claim 1 wherein said thermoset material comprises a material selected from the group consisting of (i) a diene-containing polymer, (ii) a metallocene catalyzed polyolefin that is cross-linked, (iii) a polyurethane, (iv) a silicone, (v) a polyamide, (vi) a polyurea, and (vii) combinations thereof; and said thermoplastic material comprises a material selected from the group consisting of (i) an ionomer, (ii) a polyurethane, (iii) an elastomer, (iv) a polyetheramide, (v) a polyetherester, (vi) a metallocene catalyzed polyolefin, (vii) a styrene butadiene block copolymer, and (viii) combinations thereof.

4. The golf ball of claim 1 wherein said core layer comprises more than one layer.

5. The golf ball of claim 1 wherein said center component thermoset material comprises a polybutadiene rubber.

6. The golf ball of claim 5 wherein said thermoset polybutadiene rubber further comprises zinc diacrylate (ZDA).

7. The golf ball of claim 1 wherein said core layer thermoset material comprises polybutadiene rubber.

8. The golf ball of claim 7 wherein said polybutadiene rubber further comprises zinc diacrylate (ZDA).

9. The golf ball of claim 1 wherein said center component of said multi-layer core has an outer diameter of from about 1.340 inches to about 1.400 inches, and said core layer of said multi-layer core has an thickness of from about 0.020 to about 0.100 inches.

10. The golf ball of claim 1 wherein said center component of said multi-layer core is softer relative to said core layer.

11. The golf ball of claim 10 wherein said core layer ha s a Shore D hardness of at least 60.

12. The golf ball according to claim 1 wherein each layer in the multi-layer cover (i) and multi-layer cover (ii) is independently formed from a thermoplastic resin, a thermoset resin, or a blend thereof.

13. The golf ball according to claim 2 wherein the multi-layer cover (i) or multi-layer cover (ii) comprises at least one ionomeric material.

14. A golf ball comprising:

wherein said center component comprises a polybutadiene thermoset material and said core layer comprises a polybutadiene thermoset material; and,

a cover layer disposed about said multi-layer core;

wherein said cover layer includes at least one of (i) a multi-layer cover comprising an inner cover layer having a Shore D hardness of 65 or greater and an outer cover layer having a Shore D hardness of 65 or less, said inner cover layer being harder than said outer cover layer, (ii) a multi-layer cover comprising an inner cover layer having a Shore D hardness of 65 or less and an outer cover layer of 65 or greater, wherein said inner cover layer is softer than said outer cover layer, and (iii) a single non-ionomeric outer cover layer having a Shore D hardness of from about 40 to 80, and (iv) a single ionomeric outer cover layer having a Shore D hardness of at least 56.

15. The golf ball according to claim 14 wherein the cover layer is selected from multi-layer cover (i) or multi-layer cover (ii).

16. The golf ball of claim 14 wherein said thermoset material further comprises zinc diacrylate (ZDA).

17. The golf ball of claim 14 wherein said core layer comprises more than one layer.

18. The golf ball of claim 14 wherein said center component of said dual core comprise is softer relative to said core layer.

19. The golf ball of claim 11 wherein said core layer has a Shore D hardness of at least 60.

20. A golf ball comprising:

wherein said center component comprises a polybutadiene/ZDA thermoset material and said core layer comprises a polybutadiene/ZDA thermoset material; and,

a multi-layer, ionomeric cover layer disposed about said dual core;

wherein said cover layer includes at least one of (i) a multi-layer cover comprising an inner cover layer having a Shore D hardness of 65 or greater and an outer cover layer having a Shore D hardness of 65 or less, said inner cover layer being harder than said outer cover layer, and (ii) a multi-layer cover comprising an inner cover layer having a Shore D hardness of 65 or less and an outer cover layer of 65 or greater, wherein said inner cover layer is softer than said outer cover layer.