US20040193436A1 - Method and system using return labels with dynamically generated multiple datapoint coding - Google Patents

Method and system using return labels with dynamically generated multiple datapoint coding Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US20040193436A1
US20040193436A1 US10/659,465 US65946503A US2004193436A1 US 20040193436 A1 US20040193436 A1 US 20040193436A1 US 65946503 A US65946503 A US 65946503A US 2004193436 A1 US2004193436 A1 US 2004193436A1
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
customer
return
data
returns
merchant
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Abandoned
Application number
US10/659,465
Inventor
Edward Stashluk
Michael Stevens
Jennifer Milch
Phillip Sidari
Terry Combs
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Pitney Bowes Global Logistics LLC
Original Assignee
Individual
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Individual filed Critical Individual
Priority to US10/659,465 priority Critical patent/US20040193436A1/en
Assigned to NEWGISTICS, INC. reassignment NEWGISTICS, INC. ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: MILCH, JENNIFER A., COMBS, TERRY, STASHLUK, JR., EDWARD J., STEVENS, MICHAEL J., SIDARI, PHILLIP J.
Publication of US20040193436A1 publication Critical patent/US20040193436A1/en
Assigned to COMERICA BANK reassignment COMERICA BANK SECURITY AGREEMENT Assignors: NEWGISTICS, INC.
Assigned to COMERICA BANK reassignment COMERICA BANK SECURITY AGREEMENT Assignors: NEWGISTICS, INC.
Assigned to NEWGISTICS, INC. reassignment NEWGISTICS, INC. RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: COMERICA BANK
Abandoned legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06QINFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q30/00Commerce
    • G06Q30/01Customer relationship services
    • G06Q30/015Providing customer assistance, e.g. assisting a customer within a business location or via helpdesk
    • G06Q30/016After-sales

Definitions

  • This invention relates to merchandise return methods and systems, and more particularly to a method of managing returns of goods purchased from retailers and other merchants.
  • FIG. 1 illustrates a merchandise return process using postage due return labels in accordance with the invention.
  • FIG. 2 illustrates a return label in accordance with the invention.
  • FIG. 3 illustrates an example of bar code fields for the bar code of FIG. 2.
  • FIG. 4 illustrates a method of generating a return label in accordance with the invention.
  • FIG. 5 illustrates the use of the return label by the customer.
  • FIG. 6 illustrates the use of the return label at the return center for issuing customer credit.
  • FIG. 7 illustrates a process of dynamic routing, using data on the return label.
  • This invention described herein is a merchandising method and system that permits a merchant to provide pre-authorized returns, for which the customer need not pay shipping charges.
  • the merchant provides a special return label to the customer, which has machine readable data that enables shipping charges to be assessed at a point of delivery. Data on the return label may further ensure that the package is delivered to an initial point of return close to the customer, thereby providing “reverse zone skipping”.
  • the return label may further have data that permits the merchant to dynamically route returned packages and that permits both the merchant and the customer to be quickly notified of the status of the return.
  • the method is used by, or on behalf of, a “merchant”, which is typically a retail merchant.
  • a “merchant” which is typically a retail merchant.
  • the concepts discussed herein may be applied to any merchant, including service providers who sell goods incidentally to the providing of services.
  • the “return” may be for purposes of receiving credit for an item recently purchased, but may also be subsequent to events such as warranty claims, recalls, or for repairs.
  • the method described herein may be used in connection with a “reverse logistics return service”.
  • This type of service is becoming increasingly popular, and permits merchants to “outsource” their returns process.
  • these service providers are referred to as “returns providers”. They typically provide returns services for a number of different merchants, with part of their services being disposing of packages in accordance with the particular disposition rules of each merchant.
  • the returns label will further have data useful for identifying each merchant and may contain other data particular to that merchant.
  • the methods described herein are also useful for returns systems that handle only returns for a single merchant, such as for a merchant having an in-house returns provider.
  • One example of a returns service that could incorporate use of the return label described herein is the SmartLabelTM service offered by Newgistics, Inc.
  • This service makes use of a bar-coded shipping label, typically attached to an invoice received by the customer when the product is delivered to the customer.
  • USPS U.S. Postal System
  • the label directs the package to a returns center maintained by the service provider.
  • the returns provider assesses shipping charges, pays the carrier, and passes the shipping costs on to the merchant, who may then deduct those costs from the customer's credit for the returned item.
  • the various services that the returns provider provides to the merchant include the return label, aggregation of packages to each merchant, transportation and processing services, payment of shipping charges, reporting, and notifications to the merchant and/or the customer.
  • FIG. 1 illustrates a returns process that uses postage due return labels in accordance with the invention.
  • returns are processed through a returns provider that handles returns for multiple merchants.
  • the method described herein may be easily adapted for a returns provider that handles only returns for a single merchant.
  • the merchant is considered to “maintain” at least one returns center, whether by directly maintaining the returns center(s) or by associating with a third party that does so.
  • Step 110 a merchant has delivered an item to a customer.
  • Step 111 the customer has decided to return the item, herein referred to as “the return item”.
  • a returns label 20 has already been, or is to be, provided to the customer.
  • the return label 20 is delivered as an enclosure with the customer's original order, such as by being part of the customer invoice or a separate insert.
  • return label 20 could be downloaded from a data network and printed by the customer, or otherwise delivered to the customer by means other than being included with the merchandise delivery.
  • the return label 20 could be separately mailed or send as by facsimile.
  • the customer might access a website provided by the merchant, link to a returns page, and download the data for printing the return label.
  • Return label 20 is “pre-authorized” in the sense that the customer need not seek authorization from the merchant.
  • the customer is apprised by the merchant that returns are pre-authorized, such as by information on the invoice or other shipping documents. The notification may be explicit on the return label or elsewhere or may be implicit.
  • the customer is further apprised that the customer need not pay shipping charges, such as by a “no postage necessary” printing on the return label 20 .
  • the customer affixes the returns label 20 to the packaging for the return item, and hands over the return item to a carrier, without paying any shipping charges to the carrier.
  • the customer need not affix any indicia of postage or other shipping costs to the packaging.
  • the customer may simply deposit the package into the US postal system, by putting it into a mailbox (if postal compliant), dropping it off at a postal drop, or taking it to a post office.
  • the return is local to the customer in the sense that the customer may select whatever drop-off point is most convenient.
  • return label 20 is preprinted to indicate at least the destination for the item and the package origin (the point where the customer places the package with a carrier).
  • the destination and origin are identified by addresses, including postal codes.
  • postal codes include the ZIP (zone improvement plan) codes of the USPS and similar codes used in other countries.
  • the returns label further indicates that delivery charges are to be paid by a recipient. It further identifies the transaction leading to the return. Typically, this is a purchase transaction and the identification is by invoice number or other indicia of the package or its contents. In other embodiments, the transaction could be a warranty claim or repair request.
  • the carrier delivers the return item to the returns provider.
  • the initial point of return for the package is a specialized returns center, which may receive returns for more than one merchant.
  • the returns center may be regional for a large area such as the United States. In other words, a large geographic area may have a number of returns centers.
  • the return label 20 may ensure “reverse zone skipping”. At the time the data for each returns label 20 is composed, the destination address on the label 20 is determined.
  • the destination address is typically that of a carrier station (such as a postal center) nearest the customer. This may mean that return packages are carried from the customer drop-off location to a destination associated with the carrier for pickup by the returns provider.
  • the carrier is the USPS
  • the package could be delivered to one of 21 regional bulk mail centers (BMCs).
  • BMCs regional bulk mail centers
  • the package is delivered to the BMC closest to the location of the returns provider.
  • the returns provider may then pick up accumulated packages addressed to it. Equivalently, the carrier then may deliver the package directly to the returns center. In either case, the destination address is considered to be “to” a returns center closest to the customer.
  • Step 114 the returns provider receives the package from the carrier.
  • the returns provider scans the return label on the package and weighs the package. Any special shipping flags or indicia are entered at this time. In this manner, the returns provider receives multiple packages, which may be items originating from multiple merchants, throughout a daily course of business.
  • the returns provider calculates the shipping charges due to the carrier and electronically manifests the carrier. Typically, this is done on a daily basis. In the example of this description, the returns provider pays the carrier, and is compensated by the merchant for carrier costs and other services.
  • the returns provider then sorts the packages by merchant, again using data printed on return label 20 , and collects the packages associated with each merchant.
  • the final destination code is encoded on the return label, and may also be printed in human readable form. For large volume merchants, the destination code may be associated with a package chute and/or a docking door.
  • the returns provider may also provide “value added” services for the benefit of the merchant, such as notification of the return to merchant or notification to the customer of receipt of the package.
  • the returns provider may use the scanned return label information to notify the customer and/or the merchant that the package has been received.
  • Step 116 after aggregating the packages for each merchant, the returns provider further ships them in accordance with whatever policies are specified for that merchant. For example, the returns provider may palletize shipments back to the merchant.
  • the return label data is used to create a bill of lading, with data such as pallet counts, package counts, and shipment weight.
  • Step 118 the package is handled according to the disposition policy of the merchant, such as by being returned to stock, sent to a re-seller, liquidator, or otherwise disposed.
  • a processing center 119 is used to collect data scanned from return labels, and to process the returns.
  • the processing center 119 includes computer processing equipment, including computers, data storage, and networking equipment, appropriate for communication of data to and from returns centers, merchants, and customer, as appropriate.
  • the computing equipment is programmed to fulfill the various data processing services described herein.
  • the processing center 119 may also provide a web page or other network-accessible data source, accessible by customers for obtaining information about returns and data for printing return labels. As explained below, the processing center 119 is further used to match data on the return label to merchant rules, which may specify routing of the package or other rules for handling the return.
  • FIG. 2 illustrates an example of a return label 20 , suitable for use with the merchandise return method of FIG. 1.
  • the carrier is the USPS.
  • Return label 20 incorporates data appropriate for the merchandise return service offered by the USPS, as well as data used for additional services provided by the returns provider.
  • return label 20 would be modified to comply with the requirements of those carriers.
  • the customer's address 21 is printed on the upper left corner of label 20 . This address matches the original delivery address.
  • the visual flag 22 is a human readable code, that can be used for various purposes.
  • flag 22 is a destination code that indicates a final package destination. Examples of final destinations are a merchant's warehouse, a liquidator, or a warranty, recall or repair center. This destination code matches a destination code embedded in barcode 25 .
  • flag 22 could correlate to any sort of delivery “rule”.
  • visual flag 22 could indicate a quality of service, such as whether the package is to expedited or held for some reason.
  • flag 22 could indicate the contents of the package, such as whether it is “high value” for special handling.
  • Flag 22 permits the package to be manually sorted at the returns center for subsequent routing. In general, these examples are merchant-specific, in the sense that they represent data specific to the merchant and returns processing rules.
  • the merchandise return rectangle 23 is specific to the carrier and pertains to the relationship between the carrier and the returns provider. In the example of this description, it states the USPS permit information of the returns provider.
  • the delivery address 24 is, as explained above, the address of a delivery location that is geographically nearest the customer. This determination of this address is dependent on the customer's postal code, as specified during the transaction leading to the return (such as the purchase transaction). As stated above, the delivery address could be a carrier center, such as a USPS bulk mail center, where it is held for pickup by the returns provider.
  • Barcode 25 is a dynamically generated machine-readable code that is based on unique information about the specific transaction involving the item(s) being returned.
  • An example of barcode data is described below, but in general, the barcode data provides data for information servers 119 so that various “value added” returns processing tasks may be performed, such as manifesting of shipping charges, notifications to the customer and/or merchant, and final disposition of the returned item.
  • the barcode data permits the returns center to correlate the returned item back to the transaction with the customer.
  • One type of correlation is an invoice number, as indicated by the example below.
  • Barcode 25 may comprise various alphanumeric or numeric only formats. Various other types of machine readable coding could be used as an alternative to bar-coding, such as other types of optical scan data or radio frequency identification (RFID) tagging.
  • the coding may be printed or may be some other format, such as the electronic circuitry used in an RFID tag.
  • the “postage due” insignia 26 indicates to the customer and the carrier that shipping charges are to be paid by the recipient.
  • Barcode 25 is a “third party barcode” in the sense that need not be specified by the carrier, which in this case, is the USPS.
  • return label 20 may have one or more additional barcodes, for example a barcode containing data for the carrier's use, such as for carrier tracking or return confirmation.
  • FIG. 3 illustrates a data string that is an example of the contents of the barcode 25 of FIG. 2.
  • the example of FIG. 3 has 24 positions, each with an alphanumeric character.
  • the information in barcode 25 is “integrated” in the sense that it is contained in a single barcode or other machine readable string of data.
  • the barcode 25 contains multiple data points, and contains data that is “transaction specific”, in the sense that it identifies the transaction between the customer and the merchant or other party to whom the package is being delivered.
  • the “transaction specific” data is dynamically generated in the sense that it is generated after the original order is made, and is specific to that transaction.
  • the barcode data points are used to process the package for purposes other than moving it from one place to another.
  • carrier specific data elsewhere on the label 20 functions merely for shipping purposes.
  • Field 1 identifies the returns provider.
  • Field 2 identifies the package destination.
  • Field 3 represents the shipping origin of the package (customer's postal code), which permits assessment of shipping charges from where the customer drops off the package (the return package origin) to the returns center (or a nearby BMC) where it is pulled from the carrier.
  • Field 4 identifies the merchant from whom the item was purchased. Or, as explained above, some party other than the merchant may be involved in the transaction leading to the return, such as a warranty or repair service.
  • Field 5 a selector field, may be used for various purposes, such as to identify the label type, or to identify a shipping category, such as Priority Mail or customer-paid.
  • Field 6 identifies the transaction involving the returned item in some manner. As explained above, often the merchant uses this field to correlate the return label to the original order, such as by filling the field with the invoice number. This field could also be used for data such as a customer number, product SKU, or other data.
  • one or more of the above-described fields could be omitted and another field used to link to the same information at the returns center.
  • Field 3 the customer's postal code
  • Field 6 used at the returns center to dynamically link to stored data that provides the customer's postal code.
  • barcode 25 would equivalently be considered to contain “data representing at least the origin of the package and identification of the transaction”.
  • barcode data in the example of FIG. 3 is minimal and additional data could be easily included. Additional data points that may be included in the barcode 25 include data points falling into categories “transaction specific”, “merchant specific”, “customer specific”, “product specific”, “trading partner”, or “disposition” data.
  • Transaction specific data identifies the transaction, such as by invoice number in the case of a purchase transaction.
  • the “merchant specific” data identifies the merchant or some characteristic of the merchant.
  • the “customer specific” identifies the customer or some characteristic of the customer.
  • Product specific” data identifies the package contents, such as by SKU number.
  • Trading partner” data describes a trading partner of the returns center, such as a liquidator or other service provider.
  • disposition data describes a disposition rule or final destination of the returned item.
  • the merchant directly provides the return label (or data for generating the return label) to the customer.
  • the returns provider provides the label specifications to the merchant, as well as a delivery address data file. This data file is used to correlate each customer's postal code to the returns provider location that is closest to the customer.
  • the data file is made available to the merchant via data network access, such as by the internet.
  • the data on the returns label 20 is pre-printed.
  • the customer might fill in at least some of this data.
  • label 20 could have a predetermined format, and the customer would be directed to fill in certain information such as the customer's address, the package invoice number, or a shipping destination.
  • label 20 is entirely pre-printed or all or partly filled by the customer, it is deemed to have a predetermined format, and prior to being shipped by the customer, to contain certain customer data as discussed in connection with FIGS. 2 and 3.
  • the various data elements described above in connection with FIGS. 2 and 3 can be used to implement the various returns services described herein, and some of these concepts may be implemented independently of others.
  • the returns center can perform reverse manifesting.
  • the returns center can dynamically route the package or notify the merchant or the customer about the status of the return.
  • FIG. 4 illustrates a process of generating a return label, such as return label 20 .
  • the return label 20 is to be provided to the customer in the original shipment.
  • the merchant enters the order information to an automated order processing system.
  • the merchant determines whether the order is an exception item.
  • the merchant receives BMC (bulk mail center) data, which as explained above, is used to determine the BMC closest to the customer. In other embodiments, where the carrier is not the USPS, the address of some other carrier station close to the customer is used.
  • BMC bulk mail center
  • the return label and invoice are printed.
  • the order is fulfilled and shipped to the customer, with the return label being enclosed with the order.
  • FIG. 5 illustrates the use of the return label 20 by the customer.
  • Steps 501 - 510 illustrates various alternative ways for the customer to obtain the label 20 .
  • the customer receives the label 20 with the invoice in the original shipment, as described above in connection with FIG. 4.
  • the customer may merely detach the label (Step 509 ).
  • Step 502 the customer receives the label 20 by contacting customer service of the merchant, such as by phone call or email (Step 504 ).
  • the label is then generated (Step 506 ) and emailed to the customer (Step 508 ).
  • Steps 503 and 505 the customer receives the label by accessing a website and requesting an image.
  • the label is generated and displayed (Steps 506 and 507 ) and the customer prints the label (Step 510 ).
  • Step 520 the customer prepares the return by filling out a return form and applying the return label to the package.
  • Steps 521 and 522 the customer packages the return and drops it with the carrier specified by the merchant.
  • Steps 530 - 536 illustrate how data from the return label can be used to facilitate tracking requests.
  • the package has been received at the returns center and scanned as described above in connection with FIG. 1.
  • the data is stored and accessible by a tracking process, which may be part of processing system 119 .
  • Step 531 the customer makes a tracking request through customer service of the merchant.
  • Step 533 the request is processed, and the results communicated to the customer.
  • Step 532 the customer makes a tracking request via the merchant's website.
  • Steps 533 and 534 the request is processed and the results are displayed.
  • FIG. 6 illustrates an example of the use of return label 20 for issuing credit to the customer.
  • FIG. 6 is an expansion of one aspect of the returns center processing in Step 114 of FIG. 1.
  • Step 61 the package with the return label affixed is received at the returns center. It is assumed that return label 20 has at least some means to correlate the package to the original order, such as an invoice number.
  • Step 62 the label is scanned and linked to the original order.
  • Step 63 the reason for the return is captured, such as by reading the return form. The reason for the return may be used to determine whether the customer is to bear shipping costs for the return, and hence the amount of credit to the customer. The return reason may be communicated to the merchant, in addition to other return information, using processing system 119 .
  • Step 64 the credit due the customer is calculated. Step 64 may involve accessing stored business rules of the merchant.
  • Step 65 data for implementing credit to the customer is delivered to the appropriate processing center.
  • FIG. 7 illustrates how the data on returns label 20 can be used to implement “dynamic routing”.
  • the package is received at a returns center.
  • data on barcode 25 is linked to the merchant's specifications for routing the package to its final destination.
  • the package is routed in accordance with whatever specifications are current at that time.
  • the original shipment data may indicate that a package contains a seasonal item. At the end of the season, these packages may then be routed to an outlet destination rather than a re-stock destination.
  • the original shipment information might merely identify the merchant. The returns center can then match the packages of that merchant to the current rules for that merchant, such as by routing all packages to a particular destination.

Abstract

A method of providing returnable customer items, originally purchased from a merchant. The merchant provides the customer with a special returns label that permits the customer to drop the return package with a carrier without paying shipping charges to the carrier. The label includes an integrated machine readable code, which permits a returns center to easily assess shipping charges and perform other services related to the return.

Description

    RELATED PATENT APPLICATION
  • This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application Serial No. 60/446,142 filed Feb. 10, 2002 and entitled “Retail Package Returns Service System Using Postage Due Labels”.[0001]
  • TECHNICAL FIELD OF THE INVENTION
  • This invention relates to merchandise return methods and systems, and more particularly to a method of managing returns of goods purchased from retailers and other merchants. [0002]
  • BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
  • The growing use of electronic commerce as a customer marketplace has led to a greater need for appropriate customer return methods. In the absence of conveniently located retail stores, the customer needs an acceptable method of returning goods. Various “reverse logistics” systems have been developed to meet this need. These systems are a subset of the growing industry of “supply chain management” systems, and are designed to help merchants manage customer returns. [0003]
  • For returns, as opposed to forward deliveries, the typical returns process requires the customer to take the package to the carrier and pay shipping costs. As an alternative to customer-paid shipping, some merchants have turned to a merchandise return service available from the United States Postal Service (USPS), which permits the customer use an addressed and prepaid merchandise return label. The customer may deposit the package at any post office or in a mailbox, and postage is paid by the merchant. The merchant decides the ultimate return shipping cost to the customer, such as by deducting that cost from the customer's credit. [0004]
  • Existing merchandise return service methods, such as that offered by the USPS, although convenient for the customer, can be costly and time consuming for the merchant. [0005]
  • BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
  • FIG. 1 illustrates a merchandise return process using postage due return labels in accordance with the invention. [0006]
  • FIG. 2 illustrates a return label in accordance with the invention. [0007]
  • FIG. 3 illustrates an example of bar code fields for the bar code of FIG. 2. [0008]
  • FIG. 4 illustrates a method of generating a return label in accordance with the invention. [0009]
  • FIG. 5 illustrates the use of the return label by the customer. [0010]
  • FIG. 6 illustrates the use of the return label at the return center for issuing customer credit. [0011]
  • FIG. 7 illustrates a process of dynamic routing, using data on the return label. [0012]
  • DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
  • This invention described herein is a merchandising method and system that permits a merchant to provide pre-authorized returns, for which the customer need not pay shipping charges. The merchant provides a special return label to the customer, which has machine readable data that enables shipping charges to be assessed at a point of delivery. Data on the return label may further ensure that the package is delivered to an initial point of return close to the customer, thereby providing “reverse zone skipping”. The return label may further have data that permits the merchant to dynamically route returned packages and that permits both the merchant and the customer to be quickly notified of the status of the return. [0013]
  • The method is used by, or on behalf of, a “merchant”, which is typically a retail merchant. However, the concepts discussed herein may be applied to any merchant, including service providers who sell goods incidentally to the providing of services. The “return” may be for purposes of receiving credit for an item recently purchased, but may also be subsequent to events such as warranty claims, recalls, or for repairs. [0014]
  • The method described herein may be used in connection with a “reverse logistics return service”. This type of service is becoming increasingly popular, and permits merchants to “outsource” their returns process. For purposes of this description, these service providers are referred to as “returns providers”. They typically provide returns services for a number of different merchants, with part of their services being disposing of packages in accordance with the particular disposition rules of each merchant. [0015]
  • If the merchant uses such a returns provider, the returns label will further have data useful for identifying each merchant and may contain other data particular to that merchant. However, the methods described herein are also useful for returns systems that handle only returns for a single merchant, such as for a merchant having an in-house returns provider. [0016]
  • One example of a returns service that could incorporate use of the return label described herein is the SmartLabel™ service offered by Newgistics, Inc. This service makes use of a bar-coded shipping label, typically attached to an invoice received by the customer when the product is delivered to the customer. To return the product, the customer simply affixes the label to the return package, and drops the package anywhere into the U.S. Postal System (USPS), such as by dropping it into a mailbox. The label directs the package to a returns center maintained by the service provider. The returns provider assesses shipping charges, pays the carrier, and passes the shipping costs on to the merchant, who may then deduct those costs from the customer's credit for the returned item. The various services that the returns provider provides to the merchant include the return label, aggregation of packages to each merchant, transportation and processing services, payment of shipping charges, reporting, and notifications to the merchant and/or the customer. [0017]
  • For purposes of example herein, it is assumed that the carrier that ships the returned items is the United States Postal Service. However, the same concepts could be applied to a returns process that uses other carriers or multiple carriers, so long as each carrier has the equivalent of postage due capability, that is, the ability to collect shipping charges after the package is delivered, that is, from the returns provider (the package recipient) rather than from the customer. [0018]
  • Overview of Returns with Postage Due Shipping
  • FIG. 1 illustrates a returns process that uses postage due return labels in accordance with the invention. In the embodiment of FIG. 1, returns are processed through a returns provider that handles returns for multiple merchants. However, as stated above, the method described herein may be easily adapted for a returns provider that handles only returns for a single merchant. In either case, the merchant is considered to “maintain” at least one returns center, whether by directly maintaining the returns center(s) or by associating with a third party that does so. [0019]
  • In [0020] Step 110, a merchant has delivered an item to a customer. In Step 111, the customer has decided to return the item, herein referred to as “the return item”.
  • A [0021] returns label 20 has already been, or is to be, provided to the customer. In the example of FIG. 1, the return label 20 is delivered as an enclosure with the customer's original order, such as by being part of the customer invoice or a separate insert.
  • In other embodiments, [0022] return label 20 could be downloaded from a data network and printed by the customer, or otherwise delivered to the customer by means other than being included with the merchandise delivery. For example, the return label 20 could be separately mailed or send as by facsimile. As another example, the customer might access a website provided by the merchant, link to a returns page, and download the data for printing the return label.
  • [0023] Return label 20 is “pre-authorized” in the sense that the customer need not seek authorization from the merchant. The customer is apprised by the merchant that returns are pre-authorized, such as by information on the invoice or other shipping documents. The notification may be explicit on the return label or elsewhere or may be implicit. The customer is further apprised that the customer need not pay shipping charges, such as by a “no postage necessary” printing on the return label 20.
  • An example of a [0024] suitable return label 20 is described below in connection with FIGS. 2 and 3.
  • The customer affixes the [0025] returns label 20 to the packaging for the return item, and hands over the return item to a carrier, without paying any shipping charges to the carrier. The customer need not affix any indicia of postage or other shipping costs to the packaging. In the example of this description, the customer may simply deposit the package into the US postal system, by putting it into a mailbox (if postal compliant), dropping it off at a postal drop, or taking it to a post office. The return is local to the customer in the sense that the customer may select whatever drop-off point is most convenient.
  • As further explained below in connection with FIG. 2, [0026] return label 20 is preprinted to indicate at least the destination for the item and the package origin (the point where the customer places the package with a carrier). Typically, the destination and origin are identified by addresses, including postal codes. For purposes of this description, “postal codes” include the ZIP (zone improvement plan) codes of the USPS and similar codes used in other countries.
  • The returns label further indicates that delivery charges are to be paid by a recipient. It further identifies the transaction leading to the return. Typically, this is a purchase transaction and the identification is by invoice number or other indicia of the package or its contents. In other embodiments, the transaction could be a warranty claim or repair request. [0027]
  • In [0028] Step 112, the carrier delivers the return item to the returns provider. As stated above, in the embodiment of FIG. 1, the initial point of return for the package is a specialized returns center, which may receive returns for more than one merchant. The returns center may be regional for a large area such as the United States. In other words, a large geographic area may have a number of returns centers.
  • For a returns provider having regional returns centers, the [0029] return label 20 may ensure “reverse zone skipping”. At the time the data for each returns label 20 is composed, the destination address on the label 20 is determined.
  • The destination address is typically that of a carrier station (such as a postal center) nearest the customer. This may mean that return packages are carried from the customer drop-off location to a destination associated with the carrier for pickup by the returns provider. For example, where the carrier is the USPS, the package could be delivered to one of [0030] 21 regional bulk mail centers (BMCs). The package is delivered to the BMC closest to the location of the returns provider. The returns provider may then pick up accumulated packages addressed to it. Equivalently, the carrier then may deliver the package directly to the returns center. In either case, the destination address is considered to be “to” a returns center closest to the customer.
  • In [0031] Step 114, the returns provider receives the package from the carrier. The returns provider scans the return label on the package and weighs the package. Any special shipping flags or indicia are entered at this time. In this manner, the returns provider receives multiple packages, which may be items originating from multiple merchants, throughout a daily course of business.
  • In a process known as “manifesting”, the returns provider calculates the shipping charges due to the carrier and electronically manifests the carrier. Typically, this is done on a daily basis. In the example of this description, the returns provider pays the carrier, and is compensated by the merchant for carrier costs and other services. [0032]
  • The returns provider then sorts the packages by merchant, again using data printed on [0033] return label 20, and collects the packages associated with each merchant. The final destination code is encoded on the return label, and may also be printed in human readable form. For large volume merchants, the destination code may be associated with a package chute and/or a docking door.
  • The returns provider may also provide “value added” services for the benefit of the merchant, such as notification of the return to merchant or notification to the customer of receipt of the package. For example, the returns provider may use the scanned return label information to notify the customer and/or the merchant that the package has been received. [0034]
  • In [0035] Step 116, after aggregating the packages for each merchant, the returns provider further ships them in accordance with whatever policies are specified for that merchant. For example, the returns provider may palletize shipments back to the merchant. The return label data is used to create a bill of lading, with data such as pallet counts, package counts, and shipment weight.
  • In [0036] Step 118, the package is handled according to the disposition policy of the merchant, such as by being returned to stock, sent to a re-seller, liquidator, or otherwise disposed.
  • A [0037] processing center 119 is used to collect data scanned from return labels, and to process the returns. The processing center 119 includes computer processing equipment, including computers, data storage, and networking equipment, appropriate for communication of data to and from returns centers, merchants, and customer, as appropriate. The computing equipment is programmed to fulfill the various data processing services described herein. The processing center 119 may also provide a web page or other network-accessible data source, accessible by customers for obtaining information about returns and data for printing return labels. As explained below, the processing center 119 is further used to match data on the return label to merchant rules, which may specify routing of the package or other rules for handling the return.
  • Returns Label Provided to the Customer
  • FIG. 2 illustrates an example of a [0038] return label 20, suitable for use with the merchandise return method of FIG. 1. In the example of FIG. 2, the carrier is the USPS. Return label 20 incorporates data appropriate for the merchandise return service offered by the USPS, as well as data used for additional services provided by the returns provider. As stated above, other or additional carriers having the equivalent of postage due capabilities could be used, in which case, return label 20 would be modified to comply with the requirements of those carriers.
  • The customer's [0039] address 21 is printed on the upper left corner of label 20. This address matches the original delivery address.
  • The [0040] visual flag 22 is a human readable code, that can be used for various purposes. In the example of this description, flag 22 is a destination code that indicates a final package destination. Examples of final destinations are a merchant's warehouse, a liquidator, or a warranty, recall or repair center. This destination code matches a destination code embedded in barcode 25. In other embodiments, flag 22 could correlate to any sort of delivery “rule”. As another example, visual flag 22 could indicate a quality of service, such as whether the package is to expedited or held for some reason. Or flag 22, could indicate the contents of the package, such as whether it is “high value” for special handling. Flag 22 permits the package to be manually sorted at the returns center for subsequent routing. In general, these examples are merchant-specific, in the sense that they represent data specific to the merchant and returns processing rules.
  • The [0041] merchandise return rectangle 23 is specific to the carrier and pertains to the relationship between the carrier and the returns provider. In the example of this description, it states the USPS permit information of the returns provider.
  • The [0042] delivery address 24 is, as explained above, the address of a delivery location that is geographically nearest the customer. This determination of this address is dependent on the customer's postal code, as specified during the transaction leading to the return (such as the purchase transaction). As stated above, the delivery address could be a carrier center, such as a USPS bulk mail center, where it is held for pickup by the returns provider.
  • [0043] Barcode 25 is a dynamically generated machine-readable code that is based on unique information about the specific transaction involving the item(s) being returned. An example of barcode data is described below, but in general, the barcode data provides data for information servers 119 so that various “value added” returns processing tasks may be performed, such as manifesting of shipping charges, notifications to the customer and/or merchant, and final disposition of the returned item.
  • The barcode data permits the returns center to correlate the returned item back to the transaction with the customer. One type of correlation is an invoice number, as indicated by the example below. [0044]
  • [0045] Barcode 25 may comprise various alphanumeric or numeric only formats. Various other types of machine readable coding could be used as an alternative to bar-coding, such as other types of optical scan data or radio frequency identification (RFID) tagging. The coding may be printed or may be some other format, such as the electronic circuitry used in an RFID tag.
  • The “postage due” [0046] insignia 26, including the horizontal bars 26 a, indicates to the customer and the carrier that shipping charges are to be paid by the recipient.
  • [0047] Barcode 25 is a “third party barcode” in the sense that need not be specified by the carrier, which in this case, is the USPS. Although not shown in FIG. 2, return label 20 may have one or more additional barcodes, for example a barcode containing data for the carrier's use, such as for carrier tracking or return confirmation.
  • FIG. 3 illustrates a data string that is an example of the contents of the [0048] barcode 25 of FIG. 2. The example of FIG. 3 has 24 positions, each with an alphanumeric character. The information in barcode 25 is “integrated” in the sense that it is contained in a single barcode or other machine readable string of data.
  • The [0049] barcode 25 contains multiple data points, and contains data that is “transaction specific”, in the sense that it identifies the transaction between the customer and the merchant or other party to whom the package is being delivered. The “transaction specific” data is dynamically generated in the sense that it is generated after the original order is made, and is specific to that transaction.
  • In general, the barcode data points are used to process the package for purposes other than moving it from one place to another. In contrast, “carrier specific” data elsewhere on the [0050] label 20 functions merely for shipping purposes.
  • [0051] Field 1 identifies the returns provider. Field 2 identifies the package destination.
  • [0052] Field 3 represents the shipping origin of the package (customer's postal code), which permits assessment of shipping charges from where the customer drops off the package (the return package origin) to the returns center (or a nearby BMC) where it is pulled from the carrier.
  • [0053] Field 4 identifies the merchant from whom the item was purchased. Or, as explained above, some party other than the merchant may be involved in the transaction leading to the return, such as a warranty or repair service.
  • [0054] Field 5, a selector field, may be used for various purposes, such as to identify the label type, or to identify a shipping category, such as Priority Mail or customer-paid.
  • [0055] Field 6 identifies the transaction involving the returned item in some manner. As explained above, often the merchant uses this field to correlate the return label to the original order, such as by filling the field with the invoice number. This field could also be used for data such as a customer number, product SKU, or other data.
  • If desired, one or more of the above-described fields could be omitted and another field used to link to the same information at the returns center. For example, Field 3 (the customer's postal code) could be omitted and [0056] Field 6 used at the returns center to dynamically link to stored data that provides the customer's postal code. In this event, barcode 25 would equivalently be considered to contain “data representing at least the origin of the package and identification of the transaction”.
  • It should be understood that the barcode data in the example of FIG. 3 is minimal and additional data could be easily included. Additional data points that may be included in the [0057] barcode 25 include data points falling into categories “transaction specific”, “merchant specific”, “customer specific”, “product specific”, “trading partner”, or “disposition” data. “Transaction specific” data identifies the transaction, such as by invoice number in the case of a purchase transaction. The “merchant specific” data identifies the merchant or some characteristic of the merchant. The “customer specific” identifies the customer or some characteristic of the customer. “Product specific” data identifies the package contents, such as by SKU number. “Trading partner” data describes a trading partner of the returns center, such as a liquidator or other service provider. “Disposition” data describes a disposition rule or final destination of the returned item.
  • Often, the merchant directly provides the return label (or data for generating the return label) to the customer. To this end, the returns provider provides the label specifications to the merchant, as well as a delivery address data file. This data file is used to correlate each customer's postal code to the returns provider location that is closest to the customer. The data file is made available to the merchant via data network access, such as by the internet. [0058]
  • In the example of FIGS. 2 and 3, the data on the returns label [0059] 20 is pre-printed. In other embodiments, the customer might fill in at least some of this data. For example, label 20 could have a predetermined format, and the customer would be directed to fill in certain information such as the customer's address, the package invoice number, or a shipping destination. However, in general, regardless whether label 20 is entirely pre-printed or all or partly filled by the customer, it is deemed to have a predetermined format, and prior to being shipped by the customer, to contain certain customer data as discussed in connection with FIGS. 2 and 3.
  • The various data elements described above in connection with FIGS. 2 and 3 can be used to implement the various returns services described herein, and some of these concepts may be implemented independently of others. For example, by using data representing the origin of the package (such as the customer's postal code), the returns center can perform reverse manifesting. By using data representing the original shipment (such as the identity of the merchant, the invoice, or the item), the returns center can dynamically route the package or notify the merchant or the customer about the status of the return. [0060]
  • Use of the Returns Label
  • FIG. 4 illustrates a process of generating a return label, such as [0061] return label 20. In the example of FIG. 4, the return label 20 is to be provided to the customer in the original shipment. In Step 41, the merchant enters the order information to an automated order processing system. In Step 42, the merchant determines whether the order is an exception item. In Step 43, the merchant receives BMC (bulk mail center) data, which as explained above, is used to determine the BMC closest to the customer. In other embodiments, where the carrier is not the USPS, the address of some other carrier station close to the customer is used. In Steps 44 and 45, the return label and invoice are printed. In Steps 46 and 47, the order is fulfilled and shipped to the customer, with the return label being enclosed with the order.
  • FIG. 5 illustrates the use of the [0062] return label 20 by the customer. Steps 501-510 illustrates various alternative ways for the customer to obtain the label 20. In Step 501, the customer receives the label 20 with the invoice in the original shipment, as described above in connection with FIG. 4. The customer may merely detach the label (Step 509).
  • In [0063] Step 502, the customer receives the label 20 by contacting customer service of the merchant, such as by phone call or email (Step 504). The label is then generated (Step 506) and emailed to the customer (Step 508).
  • In [0064] Steps 503 and 505, the customer receives the label by accessing a website and requesting an image. The label is generated and displayed (Steps 506 and 507) and the customer prints the label (Step 510).
  • In [0065] Step 520, the customer prepares the return by filling out a return form and applying the return label to the package. In Steps 521 and 522, the customer packages the return and drops it with the carrier specified by the merchant.
  • Steps [0066] 530-536 illustrate how data from the return label can be used to facilitate tracking requests. In Step 530, the package has been received at the returns center and scanned as described above in connection with FIG. 1. The data is stored and accessible by a tracking process, which may be part of processing system 119.
  • In [0067] Step 531, the customer makes a tracking request through customer service of the merchant. In Step 533, the request is processed, and the results communicated to the customer. In Step 532, the customer makes a tracking request via the merchant's website. In Steps 533 and 534, the request is processed and the results are displayed.
  • FIG. 6 illustrates an example of the use of [0068] return label 20 for issuing credit to the customer. FIG. 6 is an expansion of one aspect of the returns center processing in Step 114 of FIG. 1.
  • In [0069] Step 61, the package with the return label affixed is received at the returns center. It is assumed that return label 20 has at least some means to correlate the package to the original order, such as an invoice number. In Step 62, the label is scanned and linked to the original order. In Step 63, the reason for the return is captured, such as by reading the return form. The reason for the return may be used to determine whether the customer is to bear shipping costs for the return, and hence the amount of credit to the customer. The return reason may be communicated to the merchant, in addition to other return information, using processing system 119. In Step 64, the credit due the customer is calculated. Step 64 may involve accessing stored business rules of the merchant. In Step 65, data for implementing credit to the customer is delivered to the appropriate processing center.
  • FIG. 7 illustrates how the data on returns label [0070] 20 can be used to implement “dynamic routing”. In Step 71, the package is received at a returns center. In Step 72, at the returns center, using processing system 119, data on barcode 25 is linked to the merchant's specifications for routing the package to its final destination. In Step 73, the package is routed in accordance with whatever specifications are current at that time. For example, the original shipment data may indicate that a package contains a seasonal item. At the end of the season, these packages may then be routed to an outlet destination rather than a re-stock destination. As another example, for a returns center that handles packages for more than one merchant, the original shipment information might merely identify the merchant. The returns center can then match the packages of that merchant to the current rules for that merchant, such as by routing all packages to a particular destination.

Claims (24)

What is claimed is:
1. A method, performed by a returns provider, of enabling a customer to ship a package containing one or more items previously acquired from a merchant during a unique transaction, comprising the step of:
providing the customer with a return label to be placed on the package, the label containing a shipping destination of the package and integrated machine readable data representing at least a shipping origin of the package and identification of the transaction.
2. The method of claim 1, wherein the returns provider is the merchant.
3. The method of claim 1, wherein the returns provider is a service provider to the merchant.
4. The method of claim 1, wherein at least a portion of the return label conforms to the USPS merchandise return service specifications.
5. The method of claim 1, wherein the providing step is performed by enclosing the return label with items shipped to the customer.
6. The method of claim 5, wherein the return label is attached to an invoice for the item.
7. The method of claim 1, wherein the providing step is performed by the customer downloading data from the Internet for printing the label.
8. The method of claim 1, wherein the shipping origin of the package is represented by the customer's postal code.
9. The method of claim 1, wherein the machine readable data is barcode data.
10. The method of claim 1, wherein the machine readable data is radio frequency identification data.
11. The method of claim 1, wherein the return label further has a human readable code representing merchant-specific data.
12. The method of claim 1, wherein the shipping destination is to a carrier center near the returns provider.
13. The method of claim 1, wherein the returns provider maintains multiple returns destinations, and wherein the shipping destination is to a location closest to the customer.
14. The method of claim 1, wherein the purchase identification data is an invoice number.
15. The method of claim 12, wherein the machine readable data further represents merchant-specific data.
16. The method of claim 1, wherein the machine readable data further represents customer specific data.
17. The method of claim 14, wherein the machine readable data further represents product specific data.
18. The method of claim 14, wherein the machine readable data further represents trading partner data.
19. The method of claim 14, wherein the machine readable data further represents disposition data.
20. A method of enabling a customer to ship a package containing one or more items previously purchased from a merchant during a unique purchase transaction, comprising the steps of:
providing the customer with a return label to be placed on the package, the label containing a shipping destination of the package and integrated machine readable data representing at least a shipping origin of the package and identification of the purchase transaction; and
notifying the customer that, by using the return label, returns are pre-authorized and that carrier costs are due subsequent to the initiation of the return.
21. The method of claim 20, wherein the notifying step is performed at least in part by visual indicia on the return label.
22. The method of claim 20, further comprising the step of using the machine readable data to assess shipping charges.
23. The method of claim 20, further comprising the step of using the machine readable data to communicate information about the return to the merchant.
24. The method of claim 20, further comprising the step using the machine readable data to communicate information about the return to the customer.
US10/659,465 2003-02-10 2003-09-10 Method and system using return labels with dynamically generated multiple datapoint coding Abandoned US20040193436A1 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US10/659,465 US20040193436A1 (en) 2003-02-10 2003-09-10 Method and system using return labels with dynamically generated multiple datapoint coding

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US44614203P 2003-02-10 2003-02-10
US10/659,465 US20040193436A1 (en) 2003-02-10 2003-09-10 Method and system using return labels with dynamically generated multiple datapoint coding

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US20040193436A1 true US20040193436A1 (en) 2004-09-30

Family

ID=32994329

Family Applications (2)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US10/659,465 Abandoned US20040193436A1 (en) 2003-02-10 2003-09-10 Method and system using return labels with dynamically generated multiple datapoint coding
US10/745,096 Active 2029-11-19 US9033230B2 (en) 2003-02-10 2003-12-23 Reverse manifesting by returns service provider

Family Applications After (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US10/745,096 Active 2029-11-19 US9033230B2 (en) 2003-02-10 2003-12-23 Reverse manifesting by returns service provider

Country Status (1)

Country Link
US (2) US20040193436A1 (en)

Cited By (14)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20040143518A1 (en) * 2000-03-24 2004-07-22 Newgistics, Inc. On-line rules-based return processing
US20060149577A1 (en) * 2004-12-30 2006-07-06 Newgistics, Inc. System and method for the customized processing of returned merchandise
US20070299791A1 (en) * 2006-06-23 2007-12-27 Dennis Mack Systems and methods for international dutiable returns
US20090164339A1 (en) * 2007-12-21 2009-06-25 Glyde Corporation 3d product display on internet with content or transaction data on back of image
US20090164315A1 (en) * 2007-12-21 2009-06-25 Glyde Corporation Software System for Decentralizing eCommerce With Single Page Buy
US20090164383A1 (en) * 2007-12-21 2009-06-25 Glyde Corporation System and method for dynamic product pricing
US20090164273A1 (en) * 2007-12-21 2009-06-25 Glyde Corporation Product distribution system and method thereof
US20090164333A1 (en) * 2007-12-21 2009-06-25 Glyde Corporation System and method for integrated payment and shipping information
US20090164338A1 (en) * 2007-12-21 2009-06-25 Glyde Corporation Virtual Shelf With Single-Product Choice and Automatic Multiple-Vendor Selection
US7617133B1 (en) 2004-11-12 2009-11-10 Amazon Technologies, Inc. Dynamic determination of item returns during transit
US20110029429A1 (en) * 2009-07-28 2011-02-03 Psi Systems, Inc. System and method for processing a mailing label
US8156007B1 (en) 2004-11-12 2012-04-10 Amazon Technologies, Inc. Dynamic determination of item returns
US8620749B2 (en) 2011-06-20 2013-12-31 Glyde Corporation Customized offers for E-commerce
US9639822B2 (en) 2009-07-28 2017-05-02 Psi Systems, Inc. Method and system for detecting a mailed item

Families Citing this family (20)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US8036905B2 (en) * 2000-02-29 2011-10-11 Newgistics, Inc. Method and system for processing the local return of remotely purchased products
US8725656B1 (en) 2000-05-18 2014-05-13 United Parcel Service Of America, Inc. Freight rate manager
US8321356B2 (en) * 2000-05-18 2012-11-27 United Parcel Service Of America, Inc. System and method for calculating real-time costing information
US20040193438A1 (en) * 2003-02-10 2004-09-30 Stashluk Edward J. Merchandise return system with value added returns processing (dispositioning)
US20070170716A1 (en) * 2005-09-14 2007-07-26 Cerkleski James J Return label and tracking system
US20080126218A1 (en) * 2006-06-28 2008-05-29 La La Media, Inc. System and method for providing shipping services
WO2008005581A2 (en) * 2006-07-07 2008-01-10 United Parcel Service Of America, Inc. Compiled data for software applications
US10134003B1 (en) * 2007-02-02 2018-11-20 Versata Development Group, Inc. Multiple data source product inventory, disposition, and order management system
US20090037271A1 (en) * 2007-07-30 2009-02-05 Anthony Jeremiah Bayne Recommending the additional purchase of a lesser included part of an item, when the item is selected for purchase and is not to be delivered via the internet
DE102007057985A1 (en) * 2007-09-18 2009-03-19 Siemens Ag Method and device for transporting objects by means of marked containers
US8489472B2 (en) * 2008-05-08 2013-07-16 United Parcel Service Of America, Inc. Proactive monitoring and intervention capabilities in a package delivery system
US8918341B2 (en) * 2013-03-06 2014-12-23 United States Postal Service System and method for international merchandise return service
US20160232487A1 (en) * 2015-02-11 2016-08-11 Ben Yonker Package Delivery System, Service, Method and Application
CN108140159B (en) 2015-05-04 2023-06-06 美国邮政管理局 System and method for handling internationally distributed items
WO2019083890A1 (en) * 2017-10-25 2019-05-02 Klearexpress Corporation Delivering international shipped items
US11281850B2 (en) * 2017-12-28 2022-03-22 A9.Com, Inc. System and method for self-filing customs entry forms
WO2020014215A1 (en) * 2018-07-11 2020-01-16 Brightstar Corp. Reverse logistics system for mobile devices and method
US10846678B2 (en) * 2018-08-21 2020-11-24 Sensormatic Electronics, LLC Self-service product return using computer vision and Artificial Intelligence
US11157917B2 (en) 2018-08-21 2021-10-26 Shoppertrak Rct Corporation Self-service product return using computer vision and artificial intelligence
US11314552B1 (en) * 2020-12-08 2022-04-26 International Business Machines Corporation Dynamic determination of reverse logistics

Citations (83)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US2001A (en) * 1841-03-12 Sawmill
US10634A (en) * 1854-03-14 Movable tapering nozzle for the exhaust-pipes oe locomotives
US23496A (en) * 1859-04-05 Improvement in bands for binding grain, hemp
US32147A (en) * 1861-04-23 Clothes-drier
US32143A (en) * 1861-04-23 Improvement in machines for dressing the leaves of agave americana
US32573A (en) * 1861-06-18 Railroad-switch
US32612A (en) * 1861-06-25 Hydraulic jack
US37247A (en) * 1862-12-23 Improvement in reversible neckscarfs
US47315A (en) * 1865-04-18 Improvement in mechanical movements
US95306A (en) * 1869-09-28 Improvement in hoes
US128915A (en) * 1872-07-09 Improvement in photographic camera-stands
US138356A (en) * 1873-04-29 Improvement in billiard-cushions
US152093A (en) * 1874-06-16 Improvement in railway-car brakes
US178076A (en) * 1876-05-30 Improvement in metallic girders
US684268A (en) * 1901-05-27 1901-10-08 Fritz H Koelling Alining-bar for railway-tracks.
US5515447A (en) * 1994-06-07 1996-05-07 United Parcel Service Of America, Inc. Method and apparatus for locating an acquisition target in two-dimensional images by detecting symmetry in two different directions
US5715399A (en) * 1995-03-30 1998-02-03 Amazon.Com, Inc. Secure method and system for communicating a list of credit card numbers over a non-secure network
US5715314A (en) * 1994-10-24 1998-02-03 Open Market, Inc. Network sales system
US5724424A (en) * 1993-12-16 1998-03-03 Open Market, Inc. Digital active advertising
US5727163A (en) * 1995-03-30 1998-03-10 Amazon.Com, Inc. Secure method for communicating credit card data when placing an order on a non-secure network
US5812668A (en) * 1996-06-17 1998-09-22 Verifone, Inc. System, method and article of manufacture for verifying the operation of a remote transaction clearance system utilizing a multichannel, extensible, flexible architecture
US5815657A (en) * 1996-04-26 1998-09-29 Verifone, Inc. System, method and article of manufacture for network electronic authorization utilizing an authorization instrument
US5828840A (en) * 1996-08-06 1998-10-27 Verifone, Inc. Server for starting client application on client if client is network terminal and initiating client application on server if client is non network terminal
US5848399A (en) * 1993-11-30 1998-12-08 Burke; Raymond R. Computer system for allowing a consumer to purchase packaged goods at home
US5850446A (en) * 1996-06-17 1998-12-15 Verifone, Inc. System, method and article of manufacture for virtual point of sale processing utilizing an extensible, flexible architecture
US5860068A (en) * 1997-12-04 1999-01-12 Petabyte Corporation Method and system for custom manufacture and delivery of a data product
US5878139A (en) * 1994-04-28 1999-03-02 Citibank, N.A. Method for electronic merchandise dispute resolution
US5889863A (en) * 1996-06-17 1999-03-30 Verifone, Inc. System, method and article of manufacture for remote virtual point of sale processing utilizing a multichannel, extensible, flexible architecture
US5899980A (en) * 1997-08-11 1999-05-04 Trivnet Ltd. Retail method over a wide area network
US5937394A (en) * 1996-10-03 1999-08-10 Jaesent, Inc. System and method for pseudo cash transactions with credit back
US5934424A (en) * 1996-11-01 1999-08-10 The University Of Connecticut Centrifugal delayed resonator pendulum absorber
US5960411A (en) * 1997-09-12 1999-09-28 Amazon.Com, Inc. Method and system for placing a purchase order via a communications network
US5963916A (en) * 1990-09-13 1999-10-05 Intouch Group, Inc. Network apparatus and method for preview of music products and compilation of market data
US5963949A (en) * 1997-12-22 1999-10-05 Amazon.Com, Inc. Method for data gathering around forms and search barriers
US5963924A (en) * 1996-04-26 1999-10-05 Verifone, Inc. System, method and article of manufacture for the use of payment instrument holders and payment instruments in network electronic commerce
US5970469A (en) * 1995-12-26 1999-10-19 Supermarkets Online, Inc. System and method for providing shopping aids and incentives to customers through a computer network
US5978774A (en) * 1996-10-02 1999-11-02 Nintendo Of American Inc. Electronic registration system for product transactions
US5983208A (en) * 1996-06-17 1999-11-09 Verifone, Inc. System, method and article of manufacture for handling transaction results in a gateway payment architecture utilizing a multichannel, extensible, flexible architecture
US5984508A (en) * 1997-06-18 1999-11-16 Aveo, Inc. System, method and article of manufacture for product return of software and other information
US5987132A (en) * 1996-06-17 1999-11-16 Verifone, Inc. System, method and article of manufacture for conditionally accepting a payment method utilizing an extensible, flexible architecture
US5987140A (en) * 1996-04-26 1999-11-16 Verifone, Inc. System, method and article of manufacture for secure network electronic payment and credit collection
US5999924A (en) * 1997-07-25 1999-12-07 Amazon.Com, Inc. Method and apparatus for producing sequenced queries
US6002767A (en) * 1996-06-17 1999-12-14 Verifone, Inc. System, method and article of manufacture for a modular gateway server architecture
US6006225A (en) * 1998-06-15 1999-12-21 Amazon.Com Refining search queries by the suggestion of correlated terms from prior searches
US6016480A (en) * 1997-11-07 2000-01-18 Image Data, Llc Merchandise return fraud prevention system and method
US6016484A (en) * 1996-04-26 2000-01-18 Verifone, Inc. System, method and article of manufacture for network electronic payment instrument and certification of payment and credit collection utilizing a payment
US6029150A (en) * 1996-10-04 2000-02-22 Certco, Llc Payment and transactions in electronic commerce system
US6085172A (en) * 1996-10-02 2000-07-04 Nintendo Of America Inc. Method and apparatus for efficient handling of product return transactions
US6188994B1 (en) * 1995-07-07 2001-02-13 Netcraft Corporation Internet billing method
US6192347B1 (en) * 1992-10-28 2001-02-20 Graff/Ross Holdings System and methods for computing to support decomposing property into separately valued components
US6246997B1 (en) * 1998-03-26 2001-06-12 International Business Machines Corp. Electronic commerce site with query interface
US20010032147A1 (en) * 2000-02-29 2001-10-18 Siegel Philip S. Method and system for processing the local return of remotely purchased products
US20010037247A1 (en) * 2000-03-13 2001-11-01 Enhance, Inc. Method and system providing out-sourced, merchandise return services, and exchange and escrow services
US6321211B1 (en) * 1999-07-06 2001-11-20 Richfx, Inc. Methods and systems for electronically accepting and exchanging an online gift
US20010047315A1 (en) * 2000-03-24 2001-11-29 Siegel Philip S. System and method for single-action returns of remotely purchased merchandise
US6327576B1 (en) * 1999-09-21 2001-12-04 Fujitsu Limited System and method for managing expiration-dated products utilizing an electronic receipt
US20020010689A1 (en) * 2000-05-17 2002-01-24 Andrew Tibbs Method and system for generating and transmitting electronic shipping return labels
US20020032612A1 (en) * 2000-03-28 2002-03-14 Williams Daniel F. Apparatus, systems and methods for online, multi-parcel, multi-carrier, multi-service parcel returns shipping management
US20020032573A1 (en) * 2000-03-27 2002-03-14 Williams Daniel F. Apparatus, systems and methods for online, multi-parcel, multi-carrier, multi-service enterprise parcel shipping management
US20020077976A1 (en) * 2000-12-14 2002-06-20 John Meyer Bar coded bill payment system and method
US20020082920A1 (en) * 2000-11-17 2002-06-27 Kermit Austin System and methods for providing a multi-merchant loyalty program
US20020083007A1 (en) * 1997-10-06 2002-06-27 Sutherland Andrew V. System and method for distributing postage over a public network, enabling efficient printing of postal indicia on items to be mailed and authenticating the printed indicia
US20020095306A1 (en) * 2000-09-29 2002-07-18 Smith Joshua R. Personal mail piece tracing and tracking mechanism
US20020128915A1 (en) * 1999-12-30 2002-09-12 Enhance, Inc. Method and system providing out-sourced, merchandise return services
US6453352B1 (en) * 1997-07-14 2002-09-17 Electronic Data Systems Corporation Integrated electronic commerce system and method
US20020138356A1 (en) * 2001-03-26 2002-09-26 International Business Machines Corporation Third party merchandise return system
US20020152093A1 (en) * 2001-03-14 2002-10-17 United Parcel Service Of America, Inc. System and method for initiating returns over a network
US20020178076A1 (en) * 2001-05-24 2002-11-28 Ross Frederick L. Local returns of remotely purchased merchandise with return code validation
US6497408B1 (en) * 2000-03-20 2002-12-24 Walker Digital, Llc System and method for conducting and playing a supplemental lottery game
US20030023496A1 (en) * 2001-07-05 2003-01-30 De Mol Van Otterloo Maarten Joost Method, computer programme, and device of handling data to be used for returning items
US6526393B1 (en) * 1999-11-30 2003-02-25 Robert Alan Fredman Time controlled pre-paid delivery
US6536659B1 (en) * 2000-11-15 2003-03-25 Returns Online, Inc. Facilitating returns of merchandise purchased from other sources
US6547136B1 (en) * 2000-11-27 2003-04-15 Pitney Bowes, Inc. Verifiable carrier payment method for returning merchandise
US20030105704A1 (en) * 2001-11-30 2003-06-05 Sundel Michael B. Method and apparatus for facilitating shipment of packages
US6616189B2 (en) * 2001-06-08 2003-09-09 Premier Print & Services Group, Inc. Sequentially placed shipping and packing label system
US20040073435A1 (en) * 2002-10-09 2004-04-15 Walter Rosenbaum Method for handling return requested items
US6757663B1 (en) * 1996-10-02 2004-06-29 Nintendo Of America Electronic registration system for product transactions
US20040128265A1 (en) * 2002-04-05 2004-07-01 Holtz Lyn M. Return mechandise processing system
US6865560B1 (en) * 1999-12-28 2005-03-08 Pitney Bowes Inc. Method and system for reporting carrier delivery status to a mailer
US20050203809A1 (en) * 2004-03-09 2005-09-15 Lowe's Companies, Inc. Systems, methods and computer program products for implementing processes relating to retail sales
US6974928B2 (en) * 2001-03-16 2005-12-13 Breakthrough Logistics Corporation Method and apparatus for efficient package delivery and storage
US6980962B1 (en) * 1999-03-02 2005-12-27 Quixtar Investments, Inc. Electronic commerce transactions within a marketing system that may contain a membership buying opportunity
US7197475B1 (en) * 1999-06-30 2007-03-27 Catalog City, Inc. Multi-vendor internet commerce system for e-commerce applications and methods therefor

Family Cites Families (23)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US60000A (en) * 1866-11-27 Philandek haklow
US5943424A (en) * 1996-06-17 1999-08-24 Hewlett-Packard Company System, method and article of manufacture for processing a plurality of transactions from a single initiation point on a multichannel, extensible, flexible architecture
US7797164B2 (en) 1996-10-02 2010-09-14 Nintendo Of America, Inc. Method and apparatus for enabling purchasers of products to obtain return information and to initiate product returns via an on-line network connection
US6015167A (en) * 1998-08-14 2000-01-18 United Technologies Corporation System and method of employing a single bar code for coordinating shipping and receiving information
EP0999510A3 (en) 1998-11-02 2003-10-22 Ncr International Inc. Methods and apparatus for automated item return processing
DK1181655T3 (en) * 1999-02-08 2004-02-02 United Parcel Service Inc Package Shipment Systems and Methods Using the Internet
US20020010634A1 (en) * 1999-12-15 2002-01-24 Anthony Roman Reverse logistics processing
US7062473B1 (en) * 1999-12-21 2006-06-13 Pitney Bowes Inc. Method and process for providing postal discounting
US20010032141A1 (en) 1999-12-29 2001-10-18 Drattell Eric M. Method of and apparatus for implementing a return center
US20010032143A1 (en) * 1999-12-30 2001-10-18 Enhance, Inc. Method and system providing out-sourced, merchandise return services
US20020019777A1 (en) 1999-12-31 2002-02-14 Schwab David Michael Return of merchandize through third party locations
US20030061104A1 (en) 2000-03-16 2003-03-27 Thomson Robert W. Internet based warranty and repair service
US6754637B1 (en) * 2000-04-21 2004-06-22 Brian G. Stenz Method and apparatus to manage network based return processing
US20020019785A1 (en) 2000-05-25 2002-02-14 Jonathan Whitman System and method for returning merchandise
US7069236B1 (en) * 2000-07-10 2006-06-27 Canon Usa, Inc. System and methods to effect return of a consumer product
US8510171B2 (en) 2000-07-25 2013-08-13 Nintendo Of America Inc. Electronic product registration system with customizable return/warranty programs
US20040078346A1 (en) * 2000-12-15 2004-04-22 Amonette Thomas M Return delivery charges weight averaging system
US20030135432A1 (en) * 2002-01-15 2003-07-17 Mcintyre Henry F. Method and apparatus for managing the delivery and return of goods
US20030160097A1 (en) * 2002-02-28 2003-08-28 Gerald Steiner Package and method for merchandise return via mail
US7065492B2 (en) * 2002-07-11 2006-06-20 Laura Cinquini Method and apparatus for providing a personal item drop off/return service at security checkpoints
US7904391B2 (en) * 2002-10-24 2011-03-08 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. Methods of returning merchandise purchased by a customer from a vendor, computer implemented methods performed by a vendor, and return of merchandise processing apparatuses
US20040193438A1 (en) 2003-02-10 2004-09-30 Stashluk Edward J. Merchandise return system with value added returns processing (dispositioning)
US20040215531A1 (en) 2003-02-10 2004-10-28 Stashluk Edward J. Computer generated merchandise return labels with rules-based coding

Patent Citations (87)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US2001A (en) * 1841-03-12 Sawmill
US10634A (en) * 1854-03-14 Movable tapering nozzle for the exhaust-pipes oe locomotives
US23496A (en) * 1859-04-05 Improvement in bands for binding grain, hemp
US32147A (en) * 1861-04-23 Clothes-drier
US32143A (en) * 1861-04-23 Improvement in machines for dressing the leaves of agave americana
US32573A (en) * 1861-06-18 Railroad-switch
US32612A (en) * 1861-06-25 Hydraulic jack
US37247A (en) * 1862-12-23 Improvement in reversible neckscarfs
US47315A (en) * 1865-04-18 Improvement in mechanical movements
US95306A (en) * 1869-09-28 Improvement in hoes
US128915A (en) * 1872-07-09 Improvement in photographic camera-stands
US138356A (en) * 1873-04-29 Improvement in billiard-cushions
US152093A (en) * 1874-06-16 Improvement in railway-car brakes
US178076A (en) * 1876-05-30 Improvement in metallic girders
US684268A (en) * 1901-05-27 1901-10-08 Fritz H Koelling Alining-bar for railway-tracks.
US5963916A (en) * 1990-09-13 1999-10-05 Intouch Group, Inc. Network apparatus and method for preview of music products and compilation of market data
US6192347B1 (en) * 1992-10-28 2001-02-20 Graff/Ross Holdings System and methods for computing to support decomposing property into separately valued components
US5848399A (en) * 1993-11-30 1998-12-08 Burke; Raymond R. Computer system for allowing a consumer to purchase packaged goods at home
US5724424A (en) * 1993-12-16 1998-03-03 Open Market, Inc. Digital active advertising
US5878139A (en) * 1994-04-28 1999-03-02 Citibank, N.A. Method for electronic merchandise dispute resolution
US5515447A (en) * 1994-06-07 1996-05-07 United Parcel Service Of America, Inc. Method and apparatus for locating an acquisition target in two-dimensional images by detecting symmetry in two different directions
US5715314A (en) * 1994-10-24 1998-02-03 Open Market, Inc. Network sales system
US5727163A (en) * 1995-03-30 1998-03-10 Amazon.Com, Inc. Secure method for communicating credit card data when placing an order on a non-secure network
US5715399A (en) * 1995-03-30 1998-02-03 Amazon.Com, Inc. Secure method and system for communicating a list of credit card numbers over a non-secure network
US6188994B1 (en) * 1995-07-07 2001-02-13 Netcraft Corporation Internet billing method
US5970469A (en) * 1995-12-26 1999-10-19 Supermarkets Online, Inc. System and method for providing shopping aids and incentives to customers through a computer network
US6016484A (en) * 1996-04-26 2000-01-18 Verifone, Inc. System, method and article of manufacture for network electronic payment instrument and certification of payment and credit collection utilizing a payment
US5815657A (en) * 1996-04-26 1998-09-29 Verifone, Inc. System, method and article of manufacture for network electronic authorization utilizing an authorization instrument
US5987140A (en) * 1996-04-26 1999-11-16 Verifone, Inc. System, method and article of manufacture for secure network electronic payment and credit collection
US5963924A (en) * 1996-04-26 1999-10-05 Verifone, Inc. System, method and article of manufacture for the use of payment instrument holders and payment instruments in network electronic commerce
US5850446A (en) * 1996-06-17 1998-12-15 Verifone, Inc. System, method and article of manufacture for virtual point of sale processing utilizing an extensible, flexible architecture
US5983208A (en) * 1996-06-17 1999-11-09 Verifone, Inc. System, method and article of manufacture for handling transaction results in a gateway payment architecture utilizing a multichannel, extensible, flexible architecture
US5812668A (en) * 1996-06-17 1998-09-22 Verifone, Inc. System, method and article of manufacture for verifying the operation of a remote transaction clearance system utilizing a multichannel, extensible, flexible architecture
US6002767A (en) * 1996-06-17 1999-12-14 Verifone, Inc. System, method and article of manufacture for a modular gateway server architecture
US5889863A (en) * 1996-06-17 1999-03-30 Verifone, Inc. System, method and article of manufacture for remote virtual point of sale processing utilizing a multichannel, extensible, flexible architecture
US5987132A (en) * 1996-06-17 1999-11-16 Verifone, Inc. System, method and article of manufacture for conditionally accepting a payment method utilizing an extensible, flexible architecture
US5828840A (en) * 1996-08-06 1998-10-27 Verifone, Inc. Server for starting client application on client if client is network terminal and initiating client application on server if client is non network terminal
US6757663B1 (en) * 1996-10-02 2004-06-29 Nintendo Of America Electronic registration system for product transactions
US5978774A (en) * 1996-10-02 1999-11-02 Nintendo Of American Inc. Electronic registration system for product transactions
US6834268B2 (en) * 1996-10-02 2004-12-21 Nintendo Of America, Inc. Method and apparatus for efficient handling of product return transactions
US20010011231A1 (en) * 1996-10-02 2001-08-02 Nintendo Of America Inc. Method and appatatus for efficient handling of product return transactions
US6085172A (en) * 1996-10-02 2000-07-04 Nintendo Of America Inc. Method and apparatus for efficient handling of product return transactions
US6018719A (en) * 1996-10-02 2000-01-25 Nintendo Of America Inc. Electronic registration system for product transactions
US5937394A (en) * 1996-10-03 1999-08-10 Jaesent, Inc. System and method for pseudo cash transactions with credit back
US6029150A (en) * 1996-10-04 2000-02-22 Certco, Llc Payment and transactions in electronic commerce system
US5934424A (en) * 1996-11-01 1999-08-10 The University Of Connecticut Centrifugal delayed resonator pendulum absorber
US5984508A (en) * 1997-06-18 1999-11-16 Aveo, Inc. System, method and article of manufacture for product return of software and other information
US6453352B1 (en) * 1997-07-14 2002-09-17 Electronic Data Systems Corporation Integrated electronic commerce system and method
US5999924A (en) * 1997-07-25 1999-12-07 Amazon.Com, Inc. Method and apparatus for producing sequenced queries
US6003024A (en) * 1997-07-25 1999-12-14 Amazon. Com System and method for selecting rows from dimensional databases
US5899980A (en) * 1997-08-11 1999-05-04 Trivnet Ltd. Retail method over a wide area network
US5960411A (en) * 1997-09-12 1999-09-28 Amazon.Com, Inc. Method and system for placing a purchase order via a communications network
US20020083007A1 (en) * 1997-10-06 2002-06-27 Sutherland Andrew V. System and method for distributing postage over a public network, enabling efficient printing of postal indicia on items to be mailed and authenticating the printed indicia
US6016480A (en) * 1997-11-07 2000-01-18 Image Data, Llc Merchandise return fraud prevention system and method
US5860068A (en) * 1997-12-04 1999-01-12 Petabyte Corporation Method and system for custom manufacture and delivery of a data product
US5963949A (en) * 1997-12-22 1999-10-05 Amazon.Com, Inc. Method for data gathering around forms and search barriers
US6246997B1 (en) * 1998-03-26 2001-06-12 International Business Machines Corp. Electronic commerce site with query interface
US6006225A (en) * 1998-06-15 1999-12-21 Amazon.Com Refining search queries by the suggestion of correlated terms from prior searches
US6980962B1 (en) * 1999-03-02 2005-12-27 Quixtar Investments, Inc. Electronic commerce transactions within a marketing system that may contain a membership buying opportunity
US7197475B1 (en) * 1999-06-30 2007-03-27 Catalog City, Inc. Multi-vendor internet commerce system for e-commerce applications and methods therefor
US6321211B1 (en) * 1999-07-06 2001-11-20 Richfx, Inc. Methods and systems for electronically accepting and exchanging an online gift
US6327576B1 (en) * 1999-09-21 2001-12-04 Fujitsu Limited System and method for managing expiration-dated products utilizing an electronic receipt
US6526393B1 (en) * 1999-11-30 2003-02-25 Robert Alan Fredman Time controlled pre-paid delivery
US6865560B1 (en) * 1999-12-28 2005-03-08 Pitney Bowes Inc. Method and system for reporting carrier delivery status to a mailer
US20020128915A1 (en) * 1999-12-30 2002-09-12 Enhance, Inc. Method and system providing out-sourced, merchandise return services
US20010032147A1 (en) * 2000-02-29 2001-10-18 Siegel Philip S. Method and system for processing the local return of remotely purchased products
US20010037247A1 (en) * 2000-03-13 2001-11-01 Enhance, Inc. Method and system providing out-sourced, merchandise return services, and exchange and escrow services
US6497408B1 (en) * 2000-03-20 2002-12-24 Walker Digital, Llc System and method for conducting and playing a supplemental lottery game
US20010047315A1 (en) * 2000-03-24 2001-11-29 Siegel Philip S. System and method for single-action returns of remotely purchased merchandise
US20020032573A1 (en) * 2000-03-27 2002-03-14 Williams Daniel F. Apparatus, systems and methods for online, multi-parcel, multi-carrier, multi-service enterprise parcel shipping management
US20020032612A1 (en) * 2000-03-28 2002-03-14 Williams Daniel F. Apparatus, systems and methods for online, multi-parcel, multi-carrier, multi-service parcel returns shipping management
US20020010689A1 (en) * 2000-05-17 2002-01-24 Andrew Tibbs Method and system for generating and transmitting electronic shipping return labels
US20020095306A1 (en) * 2000-09-29 2002-07-18 Smith Joshua R. Personal mail piece tracing and tracking mechanism
US6536659B1 (en) * 2000-11-15 2003-03-25 Returns Online, Inc. Facilitating returns of merchandise purchased from other sources
US20020082920A1 (en) * 2000-11-17 2002-06-27 Kermit Austin System and methods for providing a multi-merchant loyalty program
US6547136B1 (en) * 2000-11-27 2003-04-15 Pitney Bowes, Inc. Verifiable carrier payment method for returning merchandise
US20020077976A1 (en) * 2000-12-14 2002-06-20 John Meyer Bar coded bill payment system and method
US20020152093A1 (en) * 2001-03-14 2002-10-17 United Parcel Service Of America, Inc. System and method for initiating returns over a network
US6974928B2 (en) * 2001-03-16 2005-12-13 Breakthrough Logistics Corporation Method and apparatus for efficient package delivery and storage
US20020138356A1 (en) * 2001-03-26 2002-09-26 International Business Machines Corporation Third party merchandise return system
US20020178076A1 (en) * 2001-05-24 2002-11-28 Ross Frederick L. Local returns of remotely purchased merchandise with return code validation
US6616189B2 (en) * 2001-06-08 2003-09-09 Premier Print & Services Group, Inc. Sequentially placed shipping and packing label system
US20030023496A1 (en) * 2001-07-05 2003-01-30 De Mol Van Otterloo Maarten Joost Method, computer programme, and device of handling data to be used for returning items
US20030105704A1 (en) * 2001-11-30 2003-06-05 Sundel Michael B. Method and apparatus for facilitating shipment of packages
US20040128265A1 (en) * 2002-04-05 2004-07-01 Holtz Lyn M. Return mechandise processing system
US20040073435A1 (en) * 2002-10-09 2004-04-15 Walter Rosenbaum Method for handling return requested items
US20050203809A1 (en) * 2004-03-09 2005-09-15 Lowe's Companies, Inc. Systems, methods and computer program products for implementing processes relating to retail sales

Cited By (28)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20040143518A1 (en) * 2000-03-24 2004-07-22 Newgistics, Inc. On-line rules-based return processing
US8380584B2 (en) 2000-03-24 2013-02-19 Newgistics, Inc. On-line rules-based return processing
US7617133B1 (en) 2004-11-12 2009-11-10 Amazon Technologies, Inc. Dynamic determination of item returns during transit
US9984351B1 (en) 2004-11-12 2018-05-29 Amazon Technologies, Inc. Dynamic determination of item returns during transit
US8533126B1 (en) 2004-11-12 2013-09-10 Amazon Technologies, Inc. Dynamic determination of item returns during transit
US7958061B1 (en) 2004-11-12 2011-06-07 Amazon Technologies, Inc. Dynamic determination of item returns during transit
US8156007B1 (en) 2004-11-12 2012-04-10 Amazon Technologies, Inc. Dynamic determination of item returns
US20060149577A1 (en) * 2004-12-30 2006-07-06 Newgistics, Inc. System and method for the customized processing of returned merchandise
US11645687B2 (en) 2006-06-23 2023-05-09 United Parcel Service Of America, Inc. Systems and methods for international dutiable returns
US10861067B2 (en) 2006-06-23 2020-12-08 United Parcel Service Of America, Inc Systems and methods for international dutiable returns
US20070299791A1 (en) * 2006-06-23 2007-12-27 Dennis Mack Systems and methods for international dutiable returns
US20110173129A1 (en) * 2006-06-23 2011-07-14 United Parcel Service Of America, Inc. Systems and Methods for International Dutiable Returns
US7937331B2 (en) * 2006-06-23 2011-05-03 United Parcel Service Of America, Inc. Systems and methods for international dutiable returns
US20090164333A1 (en) * 2007-12-21 2009-06-25 Glyde Corporation System and method for integrated payment and shipping information
US8589253B2 (en) 2007-12-21 2013-11-19 Glyde Corporation Software system for decentralizing eCommerce with single page buy
US20090164339A1 (en) * 2007-12-21 2009-06-25 Glyde Corporation 3d product display on internet with content or transaction data on back of image
US8244590B2 (en) 2007-12-21 2012-08-14 Glyde Corporation Software system for decentralizing ecommerce with single page buy
US20090164338A1 (en) * 2007-12-21 2009-06-25 Glyde Corporation Virtual Shelf With Single-Product Choice and Automatic Multiple-Vendor Selection
US8447645B2 (en) 2007-12-21 2013-05-21 Glyde Corporation System and method for dynamic product pricing
US20090164273A1 (en) * 2007-12-21 2009-06-25 Glyde Corporation Product distribution system and method thereof
US7899716B2 (en) * 2007-12-21 2011-03-01 Glyde Corporation System and method for integrated payment and shipping information
US20090164315A1 (en) * 2007-12-21 2009-06-25 Glyde Corporation Software System for Decentralizing eCommerce With Single Page Buy
US8630923B2 (en) 2007-12-21 2014-01-14 Glyde Corporation Virtual shelf with single-product choice and automatic multiple-vendor selection
US20090164383A1 (en) * 2007-12-21 2009-06-25 Glyde Corporation System and method for dynamic product pricing
US9639822B2 (en) 2009-07-28 2017-05-02 Psi Systems, Inc. Method and system for detecting a mailed item
US20110029429A1 (en) * 2009-07-28 2011-02-03 Psi Systems, Inc. System and method for processing a mailing label
US11861945B2 (en) 2009-07-28 2024-01-02 Psi Systems, Inc. System and method for facilitating transaction data retrieval
US8620749B2 (en) 2011-06-20 2013-12-31 Glyde Corporation Customized offers for E-commerce

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
US9033230B2 (en) 2015-05-19
US20040194056A1 (en) 2004-09-30

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US20040193436A1 (en) Method and system using return labels with dynamically generated multiple datapoint coding
US20040193438A1 (en) Merchandise return system with value added returns processing (dispositioning)
US20040215531A1 (en) Computer generated merchandise return labels with rules-based coding
USRE42177E1 (en) Facilitating returns of merchandise purchased from other sources
US11645687B2 (en) Systems and methods for international dutiable returns
US20040181310A1 (en) Merchandise return system with value added returns processing (data communications)
US20170316293A1 (en) System and method for arranging shipment and insurance for an item
US20080255863A1 (en) Method and computer program product for providing paperless customs documentation
US7426484B2 (en) Consolidated shipping and distribution of multiple orders with returns
US7617133B1 (en) Dynamic determination of item returns during transit
US6549891B1 (en) Method for managing inventory
US6970855B2 (en) Method and system for enterprise-level unassisted customer shipping
CA2537770C (en) Return-shipping label usage
US20050149413A1 (en) Systems and methods for virtual inventory management
KR20050008925A (en) A method of managing a process of packing goods
US20060089869A1 (en) Systems and methods for automated reporting of vendor non-compliance
JP3479881B2 (en) Strategic Alliance Information Management System
JP2002207801A (en) Method and system for managing transportation charge for international cargo
US20070246523A1 (en) Metered mail and online postage tracking
US20220327477A1 (en) Parcel and freight shipment management system and process
US20210304116A1 (en) Systems and methods for distributing items within a distribution network
JPH11175634A (en) Physical distribution management system
CN110852682A (en) Package processing method and device, electronic equipment and readable storage medium
Nichols Computer Supplies Overnight: Distribution Operations At Daisytek International, Inc
Stukhart Bar code standards

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AS Assignment

Owner name: NEWGISTICS, INC., TEXAS

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:STASHLUK, JR., EDWARD J.;STEVENS, MICHAEL J.;MILCH, JENNIFER A.;AND OTHERS;REEL/FRAME:015433/0695;SIGNING DATES FROM 20040330 TO 20040518

AS Assignment

Owner name: COMERICA BANK, CALIFORNIA

Free format text: SECURITY AGREEMENT;ASSIGNOR:NEWGISTICS, INC.;REEL/FRAME:017262/0541

Effective date: 20060214

Owner name: COMERICA BANK,CALIFORNIA

Free format text: SECURITY AGREEMENT;ASSIGNOR:NEWGISTICS, INC.;REEL/FRAME:017262/0541

Effective date: 20060214

AS Assignment

Owner name: COMERICA BANK, CALIFORNIA

Free format text: SECURITY AGREEMENT;ASSIGNOR:NEWGISTICS, INC.;REEL/FRAME:017262/0958

Effective date: 20060214

Owner name: COMERICA BANK,CALIFORNIA

Free format text: SECURITY AGREEMENT;ASSIGNOR:NEWGISTICS, INC.;REEL/FRAME:017262/0958

Effective date: 20060214

STCB Information on status: application discontinuation

Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION

AS Assignment

Owner name: NEWGISTICS, INC., TEXAS

Free format text: RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY;ASSIGNOR:COMERICA BANK;REEL/FRAME:025937/0166

Effective date: 20110307