US20040261118A1 - Narrowband interference and identification and digital processing for cable television return path performance enhancement - Google Patents
Narrowband interference and identification and digital processing for cable television return path performance enhancement Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- US20040261118A1 US20040261118A1 US10/465,339 US46533903A US2004261118A1 US 20040261118 A1 US20040261118 A1 US 20040261118A1 US 46533903 A US46533903 A US 46533903A US 2004261118 A1 US2004261118 A1 US 2004261118A1
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- filter
- data stream
- interference
- return path
- fourier transform
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Granted
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04N—PICTORIAL COMMUNICATION, e.g. TELEVISION
- H04N7/00—Television systems
- H04N7/10—Adaptations for transmission by electrical cable
- H04N7/102—Circuits therefor, e.g. noise reducers, equalisers, amplifiers
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04N—PICTORIAL COMMUNICATION, e.g. TELEVISION
- H04N21/00—Selective content distribution, e.g. interactive television or video on demand [VOD]
- H04N21/60—Network structure or processes for video distribution between server and client or between remote clients; Control signalling between clients, server and network components; Transmission of management data between server and client, e.g. sending from server to client commands for recording incoming content stream; Communication details between server and client
- H04N21/61—Network physical structure; Signal processing
- H04N21/6106—Network physical structure; Signal processing specially adapted to the downstream path of the transmission network
- H04N21/6118—Network physical structure; Signal processing specially adapted to the downstream path of the transmission network involving cable transmission, e.g. using a cable modem
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04N—PICTORIAL COMMUNICATION, e.g. TELEVISION
- H04N21/00—Selective content distribution, e.g. interactive television or video on demand [VOD]
- H04N21/60—Network structure or processes for video distribution between server and client or between remote clients; Control signalling between clients, server and network components; Transmission of management data between server and client, e.g. sending from server to client commands for recording incoming content stream; Communication details between server and client
- H04N21/61—Network physical structure; Signal processing
- H04N21/6156—Network physical structure; Signal processing specially adapted to the upstream path of the transmission network
- H04N21/6168—Network physical structure; Signal processing specially adapted to the upstream path of the transmission network involving cable transmission, e.g. using a cable modem
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04N—PICTORIAL COMMUNICATION, e.g. TELEVISION
- H04N7/00—Television systems
- H04N7/16—Analogue secrecy systems; Analogue subscription systems
- H04N7/173—Analogue secrecy systems; Analogue subscription systems with two-way working, e.g. subscriber sending a programme selection signal
- H04N7/17309—Transmission or handling of upstream communications
Definitions
- the above discussion describes two technologies available for this application.
- the first is an FPGA only architecture, while the second is an FPGA and DSP combination.
- the FPGA only method uses an FPGA to handle the entire processing. It calculates the FFT and designs the new filter while simultaneously filtering the incoming data stream. This method would probably be the most cost effective, but is less flexible.
Abstract
Description
- The present invention is directed to methods and apparatuses for communicating over a cable network, and more particularly to a method and apparatus for communicating over a cable network in a bi-directional manner.
- Cable Television (CATV) Networks have been undergoing rapid upgrading, particularly in North America, to provide advanced services, such as digital video, telephony and Internet services. A major part of the upgrade cycle has been the development of the return path network—the path from residential subscribers to the CATV Headend. Previously, this portion of the network was used very little, and only for minor maintenance and billing operations. As interactivity needs grew and CATV technology advanced, this portion of the network became more significant. Now, the CATV return path forms a critical portion of the system for two-way interactivity, such as telephony and data traffic.
- One key issued in determining the performance of the CATV return path is the quality of the return cable channel. Within this path, one of the most significant impairments to quality signal transmission arises from external interference, typically caused by narrowband interference of radio waves or in-home sources that generate narrowband frequency domain noise that falls within the return band of 5-42 Megahertz (MHz) (North America). Additionally, it is commonly the case that return path networks, when terminated at a CATV Headend, are combined with other return path networks. Thus, interference from one return leg of one network not only degrades or ruins the channel within which such interference falls, but also ruins channels on other legs that otherwise are clean until they reach the combining point at the CATV Headend.
- In many two-way HFC communication networks, return path systems are limited in performance by interference generated from multiple reverse path sources in the plant and in homes. Additionally, the return path is band limited, so the spectrum obscured by interference is very valuable.
- Today, field personnel perform extensive testing and troubleshooting throughout the network to identify potential narrowband interference sources. This is a costly and ongoing, time-consuming process. Moreover, many of the problems exist inside homes and therefore cannot be addressed by such troubleshooting.
- The present invention is therefore directed to the problem of developing a method and apparatus for improving the performance of return paths in two-way HFC communication networks.
- The present invention solves these and other problems by removing narrowband interference from the CATV return path prior to these paths being combined in the network.
- According to one aspect of the present invention, a method for removing narrowband interference from the CATV return path detects potential narrowband interference in real-time and adapts a filter to remove this potential narrowband interference.
- According to another aspect of the present invention, an exemplary embodiment of the above method uses previously created filters that are combined based on detected interference in an adaptive manner to continually adapt to new interference sources.
- According to yet another aspect of the present invention, an exemplary embodiment of the above method calculates new filter coefficients for a data stream filter based on detected interference in an adaptive manner to continually adapt to new interference sources.
- According to still another aspect of the present invention, two filters are operated in a ping-pong manner to enable updating of one filter while another filter is performing the data stream filter operation.
- FIG. 1 shows a block diagram of an exemplary embodiment of a method for filtering a data stream on a digital return path according to one aspect of the present invention.
- FIG. 2 shows a flow chart of an exemplary embodiment of a method for filtering a data stream on a digital return path according to another aspect of the present invention.
- It is worthy to note that any reference herein to “one embodiment” or “an embodiment” means that a particular feature, structure, or characteristic described in connection with the embodiment is included in at least one embodiment of the invention. The appearances of the phrase “in one embodiment” in various places in the specification are not necessarily all referring to the same embodiment.
- U.S. Pat. No. 6,323,793 discloses an enhanced approach to return path design, which depicts a way to architect this part of the system, as well as provide the flexibility for the introduction of further technology advances with minimal network disruption. This patent is hereby incorporated by reference as if repeated herein in its entirety, including the drawings. The referenced patent above provides a means for transport of digital signals on the return path. A benefit of the digital approach is that processing techniques become available through which the spectrum can be manipulated.
- According to one aspect of the present invention, spectrum manipulation involves performing a frequency domain analysis on the return path using Fast Fourier Transform (FFT) techniques, identifying interference above particular threshold levels. Following this, an algorithm is implemented that filters out this portion of the band, essentially cleansing the spectrum, and restoring the capability of this portion of the spectrum for traffic on other parts of the cable plant connected to it via combining. This algorithm and digital filtering operation can be programmed remotely or made to be able to adapt automatically to channel characteristics it learns while observing the spectrum.
- Cable modem technology, such as that used in return path systems, has been developed to help mitigate this interference and restore reasonable performance. These mitigation techniques require sophisticated digital processing that has limitations on how much can be accomplished without sacrificing performance in other areas, such as against additional return path impairments. Thus, this technique also eases the processing load on subsequent modem operations, freeing it up to provide processing to enhance composite performance against all impairments.
- Design Implementation
- A summary of the operation in hardware and software is as follows. Refer to FIG. 1. The digitized RF return path, implemented as previously described, is passed to the new digital processing block, an
exemplary embodiment 10 of which is shown in FIG. 1.Exemplary embodiment 10 includes asplitter 16 through which the data stream is passed so that one copy of the data stream is coupled to a data stream filter while another copy of the data stream is passed through a feed forward path. The first block on the feed forward path includes a Fast FourierTransform 12, which breaks down the data stream into its spectral components. Athreshold detector 13 identifies those spectral components that are above a predetermined, but programmable or adaptable, threshold. Typically, interference on the CATV return path is narrowband as compared to the data, hence this interference is identifiable by examining the frequency spectrum and looking for elements that occupy only a narrow portion of the band and exceed normal signal levels. These statistical characteristics and signal type identification processes can also be performed with digital processing in field environments using intelligent processing techniques. Such techniques, however, require more computational power than typically exists in field applications of return path systems today or proposed herein. Afilter builder 14 selects appropriate filters from afilter bank 15 to filter out those spectral components whose values exceed the predetermined threshold. The output of the filter builder is adata stream filter 11, which is then used in the next clock cycle, as will be described below. - In essence, the incoming data passes through an
adjustable filter 11. At start up, thisadjustable filter 11 is loaded with an all pass filter that does not alter the spectral content of the data stream. If unwanted frequencies are found in the data stream during athreshold detection process 13, new filter coefficients are loaded into thefilter 11 to remove those frequencies. The new filter coefficients are used until a new set of filter coefficients is needed or determined. Continuous, real-time data processing is used to constantly monitor the input spectrum, and make adjustments to theinput filter 11 as necessary to suppress interference adaptively. - Turning to FIG. 2, shown therein is an exemplary embodiment20 of an algorithm for filtering a data stream on a digital return path. The process 20 begins by calculating a Fast Fourier Transform (element 21). Once the spectral components of the data stream are identified, these components are compared against a predetermined threshold (element 22). Those spectral components whose value exceeds the predetermined threshold are then identified and filter coefficients are calculated to filter out these spectral components (element 23). These calculated filter coefficients are then loaded into a data stream filter (element 24), which filters the identified spectral components in the data stream. Details on each of the sub-processes follow.
- Fast Fourier Transform (FFT)
- Determining the coefficients—and thus setting the filter shape—for the adaptive filter is done by spectrum analysis on the data stream. The process begins by collecting a sample of the input data stream. The Fast Fourier Transform (FFT) of the sampled data is calculated to find the spectral content of the input data stream. This spectral content is represented by an array, where each element in the array represents a range of frequencies. The first element represents the smallest frequencies, and each successive element represents a higher frequency range.
- The format of the FFT results uses complex numbers so additional processing is required to make the results usable. One option is to calculate the absolute value of each complex number. However, calculating the square root that is required by the absolute value is very computation intensive and is an undesired complexity in practical implementation. A simpler option is to calculate the sum of the squares of the real and imaginary components of the complex number. These are other straightforward mathematical approaches as well to glean the desired information.
- For some applications, the entire frequency range may not be of interest. If this is the case, then only the elements of the FFT array that represent the frequencies of interest need be reformatted. The final result of this stage is an array of real numbers that represent the spectral content of the frequencies of interest. A further advantage of this knowledge, which is typically known by an operator ahead of time, is that it allows for higher spectral resolution from the same size FFT implementation, meaning that narrower slices of the frequency domain can be examined and scrutinized.
- Threshold Detection
- When the FFT results are in a usable format, the array is compared against a threshold value. The threshold value can be established in several different ways. The first option is to use a preset value that is set at start time and does not change over time. The second option is calculate the threshold value by inspecting the FFT results. The adjusted threshold value is then used for the current round of comparisons and is also used as the initial value in the next round of comparisons. An additional layer of sophistication is to include a running average of accumulated array samples, building a database of channel characteristics, and adjusting the threshold based on learned channel characteristics and the duration and dynamics of the interference observed.
- The result of each comparison of the FFT results versus the threshold value is recorded into a comparison array. If an element of the FFT array is greater than or equal to the threshold, then a value of 1 is recorded in the corresponding location of the comparison array, otherwise a value of 0 is recorded.
- The comparison array is then used in the next stage to create a new filter that will be used to filter the data stream. Each element in the comparison array that has a value of 1 represents a range of frequencies that are to be filtered out of the data stream.
- Filter Implementation
- The filter can be either an Infinite Impulse Response (IIR) filter or a Finite Impulse Response (FIR) filter. Either type of filter can be designed by one of two different methods.
- The first method is a direct approach. This approach uses the comparison array to establish the specifications for the new filter and then uses those specifications to directly calculate the new filter coefficients. This method can be very computation intensive in practice and adds complexity to the design.
- Another method is an indirect approach. It uses pre-designed filters that are combined to create the new filter. For this method, a bank of filters is established at start time. Each entry in the bank corresponds to an entry in the comparison array. If an entry in the comparison array as a value of 1, then the corresponding filter is pulled out of the filter bank and is used to build the new filter. This method is less computation intensive than the direct method, but requires memory to hold the bank of filters. This bank could be quite large for some variations of this design.
- The result of either method will be a filter that has a notch for each frequency range that exceeds the threshold value. As a result, that frequency range will be removed when the filter is applied to the data stream.
- The last step of the process is to take the new filter coefficients and load them into the data stream filter. If all of the coefficients can be loaded simultaneously in one clock cycle, then the filtering of the data stream can continue with no interruptions. If all the coefficients cannot be loaded in one clock cycle, then it may be necessary to have two filters. The first filter processes the data stream using the current filter coefficients while the second filter is being loaded with the new filter coefficients. Once the second filter is loaded and properly initialized, it starts processing the data stream and the first filter is turned off so that it can be loaded with the coefficients of the next filter. The two data stream filters would then alternate in a ping-pong fashion.
- This process may be repeated periodically. It can be restarted at the end of each round. It can be run periodically based on a clock, or it can be triggered to run based upon some outside event. It can also be instigated by remote command if such a communication channel is available. Meanwhile, the data stream filter is continuously processing the incoming data based on the filter coefficients that were last loaded. The precise dynamics of the update rate can be optimized based on plant models, acceptable cost and complexity trade-offs, individual operator preferences, and tolerance for channel availability. Any or all such variables can be fixed or made configurable, and all under the control of the system operator.
- Technology Aspects
- There are several technology challenges to implement this system. The two major obstacles are the potential size of the notch filter required to process the input data stream and the 100 MHz—range real-time processing clock rate.
- The filter design issues are as follows. The stringency of the specifications that are used to design the filter will determine its order, N. A typical filter structure will often require (N/2)+1 multipliers and N+1 adders. As the order of the filter increases, the computational intensity of the filter also increases. As always, a trade-off can be made between the fidelity of the filter and the amount of resources that are required to implement the filter. These resources include the size of the field programmable gate array (FPGA) and memory needed to implement the design.
- With respect to clock speed, the primary issue is the ability to process the incoming data in real-time. Since the data is arriving at 100 MHz, the output of the system must provide the results at 100 MHz. A small initial latency at start time is acceptable, but, once running, it must provide an output for each input at the 100 MHz rate. The ability to process data at this speed is state of the art for most of the technologies that are currently available.
- The two technologies that hold the most promise are Digital Signal Processors (DSPs) and Field Programmable Gate Arrays (FPGAs). The DSP's strengths are that it can run lots of different software and is easily re-programmable. It would be ideal for directly computing a new notch filter for each round of processing. However, the amount of processing that is required to process a 100th order FIR filter in real-time at 100 MHz is beyond the capabilities of any DSP chip that is currently available. As a result, the FPGA is a better technology implementation choice today. However, existing capabilities notwithstanding, the strengths of the DSP make it an attractive option as future DSP developments increase processing speed capabilities, and future designs may find this approach as a powerful architectural fit.
- Field Programmable Gate Array Implementations
- Real-time processing of data is a major strength for an FPGA. Its internal construction allows it to be configured to perform many operations in parallel. As a result, complex filters can be implemented in real-time at 100 MHz. In addition, the FPGA can be reprogrammed to use different filter coefficients or a new filter structure without any need to make other changes to the system.
- The main constraint of the FPGA is its flexibility. Once configured, it can only perform that limited functionality until it is reprogrammed. Thus, it is not suitable directly for computing a new filter. This weakness of the FPGA makes its use consistent with the indirect method previously described, which uses a bank of pre-designed filters to create a new filter.
- The above discussion describes two technologies available for this application. The first is an FPGA only architecture, while the second is an FPGA and DSP combination. The FPGA only method uses an FPGA to handle the entire processing. It calculates the FFT and designs the new filter while simultaneously filtering the incoming data stream. This method would probably be the most cost effective, but is less flexible.
- An alternative uses both a DSP and an FPGA. The FPGA is responsible for filtering the incoming data stream in real-time. The process of designing the new filter is handled by the DSP. The FFT and threshold calculations can be handled by either the FPGA or the DSP. The FPGA will compute the FFT faster, but this will use up some valuable resources of the FPGA that may be necessary for optimal filter implementation.
- Either architecture allows for future changes. The threshold value can be updated to a new value. The structure of the filter that is used to process the data stream and the method used to design the new filter can both be modified at a later time. This scalability with technology is a key advantage of digitized return processing, because CATV networks incur periodic upgrades and changes to support new applications and services, as well as to incorporate more cost-effective architectures and technologies.
- Conclusion
- CATV networks are continually upgrading and changing to support new services, as the Hybrid Fiber Coax infrastructure to the home has become a two-way communication platform. In light of these developments, techniques that assure the most effective use of the return path become particularly powerful means by which operators can get the most out of their investment in infrastructure. Frequency domain analysis, processing, and mitigation techniques that leverage already existing digitized return path equipment provide an avenue for operators to achieve network benefits. The narrowband interference detection and mitigation technique described herein assures that the HFC return path is used to its greatest extent. In this case, the processing provides a technique to gain back what is otherwise corrupted bandwidth, restoring user traffic capability in a frequency band that had previously been unusable or degraded. Advantages to the operator with enhanced digital processing distributed in the field in this way offer improvements in transmission performance. The result is the ability to most successfully implement revenue-generating two-way services associated with technological upgrades, such as cable modems and voice telephony.
- Although various embodiments are specifically illustrated and described herein, it will be appreciated that modifications and variations of the invention are covered by the above teachings and are within the purview of the appended claims without departing from the spirit and intended scope of the invention. For example, the present invention has been described in relation to cable television systems, however, the same technique could be applied to other communications systems. Furthermore, this example should not be interpreted to limit the modifications and variations of the inventions covered by the claims but is merely illustrative of one possible variation.
Claims (20)
Priority Applications (6)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US10/465,339 US7716712B2 (en) | 2003-06-18 | 2003-06-18 | Narrowband interference and identification and digital processing for cable television return path performance enhancement |
PCT/US2004/018309 WO2004114645A2 (en) | 2003-06-18 | 2004-06-08 | Narrowband interference and identification and digital processing for cable television return path performance enhancement |
MXPA05013297A MXPA05013297A (en) | 2003-06-18 | 2004-06-08 | Narrowband interference and identification and digital processing for cable television return path performance enhancement. |
CA2528607A CA2528607C (en) | 2003-06-18 | 2004-06-08 | Narrowband interference and identification and digital processing for cable television return path performance enhancement |
EP04754807.8A EP1639822B1 (en) | 2003-06-18 | 2004-06-08 | Narrowband interference and identification and digital processing for cable television return path performance enhancement |
TW093117113A TWI386057B (en) | 2003-06-18 | 2004-06-15 | Narrowband interference and identification amd digital processing for cable television return path performance enhancement |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US10/465,339 US7716712B2 (en) | 2003-06-18 | 2003-06-18 | Narrowband interference and identification and digital processing for cable television return path performance enhancement |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
US20040261118A1 true US20040261118A1 (en) | 2004-12-23 |
US7716712B2 US7716712B2 (en) | 2010-05-11 |
Family
ID=33517501
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US10/465,339 Expired - Fee Related US7716712B2 (en) | 2003-06-18 | 2003-06-18 | Narrowband interference and identification and digital processing for cable television return path performance enhancement |
Country Status (6)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (1) | US7716712B2 (en) |
EP (1) | EP1639822B1 (en) |
CA (1) | CA2528607C (en) |
MX (1) | MXPA05013297A (en) |
TW (1) | TWI386057B (en) |
WO (1) | WO2004114645A2 (en) |
Cited By (2)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20090092206A1 (en) * | 2007-10-05 | 2009-04-09 | Kajihara Hirotsugu | Wireless communication apparatus and wireless communication method using plural communication channels having different bandwidths |
US11171862B2 (en) * | 2017-03-02 | 2021-11-09 | Huawei Technolgoies Co., Ltd. | Multi-subflow network transmission method and apparatus |
Families Citing this family (24)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
EP2002581B1 (en) | 2006-03-24 | 2014-03-12 | General instrument Corporation | Method and apparatus for configuring logical channels in a network |
US9088355B2 (en) | 2006-03-24 | 2015-07-21 | Arris Technology, Inc. | Method and apparatus for determining the dynamic range of an optical link in an HFC network |
US8537972B2 (en) | 2006-12-07 | 2013-09-17 | General Instrument Corporation | Method and apparatus for determining micro-reflections in a network |
US8467305B2 (en) * | 2008-11-04 | 2013-06-18 | Broadcom Corporation | Multiservice communication device with dedicated environmental monitoring |
US8516532B2 (en) | 2009-07-28 | 2013-08-20 | Motorola Mobility Llc | IP video delivery using flexible channel bonding |
US8526485B2 (en) | 2009-09-23 | 2013-09-03 | General Instrument Corporation | Using equalization coefficients of end devices in a cable television network to determine and diagnose impairments in upstream channels |
US8654640B2 (en) | 2010-12-08 | 2014-02-18 | General Instrument Corporation | System and method for IP video delivery using distributed flexible channel bonding |
US9059786B2 (en) | 2011-07-07 | 2015-06-16 | Vecima Networks Inc. | Ingress suppression for communication systems |
US8937992B2 (en) | 2011-08-30 | 2015-01-20 | General Instrument Corporation | Method and apparatus for updating equalization coefficients of adaptive pre-equalizers |
US8576705B2 (en) | 2011-11-18 | 2013-11-05 | General Instrument Corporation | Upstream channel bonding partial service using spectrum management |
US9113181B2 (en) | 2011-12-13 | 2015-08-18 | Arris Technology, Inc. | Dynamic channel bonding partial service triggering |
US8837302B2 (en) | 2012-04-27 | 2014-09-16 | Motorola Mobility Llc | Mapping a network fault |
US8868736B2 (en) | 2012-04-27 | 2014-10-21 | Motorola Mobility Llc | Estimating a severity level of a network fault |
US8867371B2 (en) | 2012-04-27 | 2014-10-21 | Motorola Mobility Llc | Estimating physical locations of network faults |
US9003460B2 (en) | 2012-04-27 | 2015-04-07 | Google Technology Holdings LLC | Network monitoring with estimation of network path to network element location |
US9065731B2 (en) | 2012-05-01 | 2015-06-23 | Arris Technology, Inc. | Ensure upstream channel quality measurement stability in an upstream channel bonding system using T4 timeout multiplier |
US9136943B2 (en) | 2012-07-30 | 2015-09-15 | Arris Technology, Inc. | Method of characterizing impairments detected by equalization on a channel of a network |
US9137164B2 (en) | 2012-11-15 | 2015-09-15 | Arris Technology, Inc. | Upstream receiver integrity assessment for modem registration |
US9203639B2 (en) | 2012-12-27 | 2015-12-01 | Arris Technology, Inc. | Dynamic load balancing under partial service conditions |
US9197886B2 (en) | 2013-03-13 | 2015-11-24 | Arris Enterprises, Inc. | Detecting plant degradation using peer-comparison |
US9025469B2 (en) | 2013-03-15 | 2015-05-05 | Arris Technology, Inc. | Method for estimating cable plant topology |
US9042236B2 (en) | 2013-03-15 | 2015-05-26 | Arris Technology, Inc. | Method using equalization data to determine defects in a cable plant |
US10477199B2 (en) | 2013-03-15 | 2019-11-12 | Arris Enterprises Llc | Method for identifying and prioritizing fault location in a cable plant |
US10263727B2 (en) | 2016-07-06 | 2019-04-16 | Booz Allen Hamilton Inc. | System and method for mitigating narrowband interference |
Citations (37)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US4234880A (en) * | 1977-11-23 | 1980-11-18 | Siemens Aktiengesellschaft | Adaptive method and a radar receiver for suppression of disturbing portions of the Doppler spectrum |
US5014318A (en) * | 1988-02-25 | 1991-05-07 | Fraunhofer Gesellschaft Zur Forderung Der Angewandten Forschung E. V. | Apparatus for checking audio signal processing systems |
US5260980A (en) * | 1990-08-24 | 1993-11-09 | Sony Corporation | Digital signal encoder |
US5381357A (en) * | 1993-05-28 | 1995-01-10 | Grumman Corporation | Complex adaptive fir filter |
US5706013A (en) * | 1996-08-09 | 1998-01-06 | The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Air Force | Nonhomogeneity detection method and apparatus for improved adaptive signal processing |
US5765097A (en) * | 1996-05-20 | 1998-06-09 | At & T Corp | Shared hybrid fiber-coax network having reduced ingress noise in the upstream channel transmitted via a repeater |
US5859661A (en) * | 1996-04-30 | 1999-01-12 | At&T Corp. | Technique for reducing overload in a shared transmission network |
US5881363A (en) * | 1996-04-29 | 1999-03-09 | Philips Electronics North America | Method and apparatus for combatting ingress and multipath in a CATV return channel |
US5933797A (en) * | 1997-02-28 | 1999-08-03 | Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson (Publ) | Adaptive dual filter echo cancellation |
US5939887A (en) * | 1997-09-05 | 1999-08-17 | Tektronix, Inc. | Method for measuring spectral energy interference in a cable transmission system |
US6041340A (en) * | 1997-03-14 | 2000-03-21 | Xilinx, Inc. | Method for configuring an FPGA for large FFTs and other vector rotation computations |
US6131013A (en) * | 1998-01-30 | 2000-10-10 | Motorola, Inc. | Method and apparatus for performing targeted interference suppression |
US6181753B1 (en) * | 1997-04-30 | 2001-01-30 | Oki Electric Industry Co., Ltd. | Echo/noise canceler with delay compensation |
US6212229B1 (en) * | 1998-12-16 | 2001-04-03 | General Dynamics Government Systems Corporation | Adaptive pre-emphasis technique |
US6215514B1 (en) * | 1997-06-27 | 2001-04-10 | Trilithic, Inc. | Ingress monitoring system |
US6292760B1 (en) * | 1997-08-11 | 2001-09-18 | Texas Instruments Incorporated | Method and apparatus to measure non-coherent signals |
US6323793B1 (en) * | 1999-04-23 | 2001-11-27 | General Instrument Corporation | HFC return path system using digital conversion and transport |
US6327709B1 (en) * | 1998-12-22 | 2001-12-04 | General Instruments Corporation | Method and apparatus for filtering interference and nonlinear distortions |
US20020022957A1 (en) * | 2000-07-12 | 2002-02-21 | Shingo Kiuchi | Voice feature extraction device |
US6360369B1 (en) * | 1998-02-18 | 2002-03-19 | Paul F. Mahoney | Interference tolerant modem |
US6385773B1 (en) * | 1999-01-07 | 2002-05-07 | Cisco Techology, Inc. | Method and apparatus for upstream frequency channel transition |
US20020085626A1 (en) * | 2000-12-28 | 2002-07-04 | Starr Thomas J.J. | Automatic filter for asymmetric digital subscriber line system |
US20020094044A1 (en) * | 2001-01-16 | 2002-07-18 | Kolze Thomas J. | System and method for canceling interference in a communication system |
US6425132B1 (en) * | 1998-04-06 | 2002-07-23 | Wavetek Corporation | Ingress testing of CATV system utilizing remote selection of CATV node |
US6426983B1 (en) * | 1998-09-14 | 2002-07-30 | Terayon Communication Systems, Inc. | Method and apparatus of using a bank of filters for excision of narrow band interference signal from CDMA signal |
US6483872B2 (en) * | 1998-08-25 | 2002-11-19 | Stmicroelectronics, Inc. | Method and apparatus for reducing convergence time |
US20020193130A1 (en) * | 2001-02-12 | 2002-12-19 | Fortemedia, Inc. | Noise suppression for a wireless communication device |
US20020196876A1 (en) * | 2001-06-12 | 2002-12-26 | Masatoshi Takada | Interference signal removal system |
US6574797B1 (en) * | 1999-01-08 | 2003-06-03 | Cisco Technology, Inc. | Method and apparatus for locating a cleaner bandwidth in a frequency channel for data transmission |
US20030208775A1 (en) * | 2002-05-03 | 2003-11-06 | Roberts Harold A. | System, method and apparatus for coordination of channel quality assessment and ingress filtering in cable modem systems |
US6772437B1 (en) * | 1999-07-28 | 2004-08-03 | Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson | Cable modems and systems and methods for identification of a noise signal source on a cable network |
US6775840B1 (en) * | 1997-12-19 | 2004-08-10 | Cisco Technology, Inc. | Method and apparatus for using a spectrum analyzer for locating ingress noise gaps |
US6880170B1 (en) * | 1994-11-30 | 2005-04-12 | General Instrument Corporation | Ingress detection and attenuation |
US6940973B1 (en) * | 1999-06-07 | 2005-09-06 | Bell Canada | Method and apparatus for cancelling common mode noise occurring in communications channels |
US7024680B2 (en) * | 2000-11-16 | 2006-04-04 | Broadcom Corporation | Method and apparatus for detection and classification of impairments on a RF modulated network |
US7086083B2 (en) * | 1998-02-10 | 2006-08-01 | Wavetek Wandell Goltermann, Inc. | Noise measurement system |
US7254827B1 (en) * | 2000-05-08 | 2007-08-07 | Sunrise Telecom Incorporated | Ingress monitoring system and method |
Family Cites Families (4)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
GB8617674D0 (en) * | 1986-07-19 | 1986-08-28 | Armitage P R | Seismic processor |
US5648987A (en) * | 1994-03-24 | 1997-07-15 | Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. | Rapid-update adaptive channel-equalization filtering for digital radio receivers, such as HDTV receivers |
US5596600A (en) * | 1995-04-06 | 1997-01-21 | Mayflower Communications Company, Inc. | Standalone canceller of narrow band interference for spread spectrum receivers |
US5742591A (en) | 1995-06-07 | 1998-04-21 | General Instrument Corporation | Interference cancellation system for CATV return transmissions |
-
2003
- 2003-06-18 US US10/465,339 patent/US7716712B2/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
-
2004
- 2004-06-08 MX MXPA05013297A patent/MXPA05013297A/en active IP Right Grant
- 2004-06-08 WO PCT/US2004/018309 patent/WO2004114645A2/en active Application Filing
- 2004-06-08 CA CA2528607A patent/CA2528607C/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
- 2004-06-08 EP EP04754807.8A patent/EP1639822B1/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
- 2004-06-15 TW TW093117113A patent/TWI386057B/en not_active IP Right Cessation
Patent Citations (37)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US4234880A (en) * | 1977-11-23 | 1980-11-18 | Siemens Aktiengesellschaft | Adaptive method and a radar receiver for suppression of disturbing portions of the Doppler spectrum |
US5014318A (en) * | 1988-02-25 | 1991-05-07 | Fraunhofer Gesellschaft Zur Forderung Der Angewandten Forschung E. V. | Apparatus for checking audio signal processing systems |
US5260980A (en) * | 1990-08-24 | 1993-11-09 | Sony Corporation | Digital signal encoder |
US5381357A (en) * | 1993-05-28 | 1995-01-10 | Grumman Corporation | Complex adaptive fir filter |
US6880170B1 (en) * | 1994-11-30 | 2005-04-12 | General Instrument Corporation | Ingress detection and attenuation |
US5881363A (en) * | 1996-04-29 | 1999-03-09 | Philips Electronics North America | Method and apparatus for combatting ingress and multipath in a CATV return channel |
US5859661A (en) * | 1996-04-30 | 1999-01-12 | At&T Corp. | Technique for reducing overload in a shared transmission network |
US5765097A (en) * | 1996-05-20 | 1998-06-09 | At & T Corp | Shared hybrid fiber-coax network having reduced ingress noise in the upstream channel transmitted via a repeater |
US5706013A (en) * | 1996-08-09 | 1998-01-06 | The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Air Force | Nonhomogeneity detection method and apparatus for improved adaptive signal processing |
US5933797A (en) * | 1997-02-28 | 1999-08-03 | Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson (Publ) | Adaptive dual filter echo cancellation |
US6041340A (en) * | 1997-03-14 | 2000-03-21 | Xilinx, Inc. | Method for configuring an FPGA for large FFTs and other vector rotation computations |
US6181753B1 (en) * | 1997-04-30 | 2001-01-30 | Oki Electric Industry Co., Ltd. | Echo/noise canceler with delay compensation |
US6215514B1 (en) * | 1997-06-27 | 2001-04-10 | Trilithic, Inc. | Ingress monitoring system |
US6292760B1 (en) * | 1997-08-11 | 2001-09-18 | Texas Instruments Incorporated | Method and apparatus to measure non-coherent signals |
US5939887A (en) * | 1997-09-05 | 1999-08-17 | Tektronix, Inc. | Method for measuring spectral energy interference in a cable transmission system |
US6775840B1 (en) * | 1997-12-19 | 2004-08-10 | Cisco Technology, Inc. | Method and apparatus for using a spectrum analyzer for locating ingress noise gaps |
US6131013A (en) * | 1998-01-30 | 2000-10-10 | Motorola, Inc. | Method and apparatus for performing targeted interference suppression |
US7086083B2 (en) * | 1998-02-10 | 2006-08-01 | Wavetek Wandell Goltermann, Inc. | Noise measurement system |
US6360369B1 (en) * | 1998-02-18 | 2002-03-19 | Paul F. Mahoney | Interference tolerant modem |
US6425132B1 (en) * | 1998-04-06 | 2002-07-23 | Wavetek Corporation | Ingress testing of CATV system utilizing remote selection of CATV node |
US6483872B2 (en) * | 1998-08-25 | 2002-11-19 | Stmicroelectronics, Inc. | Method and apparatus for reducing convergence time |
US6426983B1 (en) * | 1998-09-14 | 2002-07-30 | Terayon Communication Systems, Inc. | Method and apparatus of using a bank of filters for excision of narrow band interference signal from CDMA signal |
US6212229B1 (en) * | 1998-12-16 | 2001-04-03 | General Dynamics Government Systems Corporation | Adaptive pre-emphasis technique |
US6327709B1 (en) * | 1998-12-22 | 2001-12-04 | General Instruments Corporation | Method and apparatus for filtering interference and nonlinear distortions |
US6385773B1 (en) * | 1999-01-07 | 2002-05-07 | Cisco Techology, Inc. | Method and apparatus for upstream frequency channel transition |
US6574797B1 (en) * | 1999-01-08 | 2003-06-03 | Cisco Technology, Inc. | Method and apparatus for locating a cleaner bandwidth in a frequency channel for data transmission |
US6323793B1 (en) * | 1999-04-23 | 2001-11-27 | General Instrument Corporation | HFC return path system using digital conversion and transport |
US6940973B1 (en) * | 1999-06-07 | 2005-09-06 | Bell Canada | Method and apparatus for cancelling common mode noise occurring in communications channels |
US6772437B1 (en) * | 1999-07-28 | 2004-08-03 | Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson | Cable modems and systems and methods for identification of a noise signal source on a cable network |
US7254827B1 (en) * | 2000-05-08 | 2007-08-07 | Sunrise Telecom Incorporated | Ingress monitoring system and method |
US20020022957A1 (en) * | 2000-07-12 | 2002-02-21 | Shingo Kiuchi | Voice feature extraction device |
US7024680B2 (en) * | 2000-11-16 | 2006-04-04 | Broadcom Corporation | Method and apparatus for detection and classification of impairments on a RF modulated network |
US20020085626A1 (en) * | 2000-12-28 | 2002-07-04 | Starr Thomas J.J. | Automatic filter for asymmetric digital subscriber line system |
US20020094044A1 (en) * | 2001-01-16 | 2002-07-18 | Kolze Thomas J. | System and method for canceling interference in a communication system |
US20020193130A1 (en) * | 2001-02-12 | 2002-12-19 | Fortemedia, Inc. | Noise suppression for a wireless communication device |
US20020196876A1 (en) * | 2001-06-12 | 2002-12-26 | Masatoshi Takada | Interference signal removal system |
US20030208775A1 (en) * | 2002-05-03 | 2003-11-06 | Roberts Harold A. | System, method and apparatus for coordination of channel quality assessment and ingress filtering in cable modem systems |
Cited By (2)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20090092206A1 (en) * | 2007-10-05 | 2009-04-09 | Kajihara Hirotsugu | Wireless communication apparatus and wireless communication method using plural communication channels having different bandwidths |
US11171862B2 (en) * | 2017-03-02 | 2021-11-09 | Huawei Technolgoies Co., Ltd. | Multi-subflow network transmission method and apparatus |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
CA2528607C (en) | 2014-05-13 |
EP1639822A2 (en) | 2006-03-29 |
US7716712B2 (en) | 2010-05-11 |
MXPA05013297A (en) | 2006-03-09 |
CA2528607A1 (en) | 2004-12-29 |
EP1639822B1 (en) | 2019-10-02 |
WO2004114645A3 (en) | 2005-11-03 |
WO2004114645A2 (en) | 2004-12-29 |
TW200511856A (en) | 2005-03-16 |
EP1639822A4 (en) | 2006-09-27 |
TWI386057B (en) | 2013-02-11 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US7716712B2 (en) | Narrowband interference and identification and digital processing for cable television return path performance enhancement | |
US6563868B1 (en) | Method and apparatus for adaptive equalization in the presence of large multipath echoes | |
CA2184393C (en) | Receiver based methods and devices for combating co-channel ntsc inference in digital transmission | |
EP1474755A1 (en) | Filter set for frequency analysis | |
CN104144138A (en) | Self-adaptive single-frequency narrow-band interference trapped wave filtering device and double-frequency filtering equipment | |
Chen et al. | Mitigation of band edge effects in fourier transform based time domain gating | |
FR2789243A1 (en) | WEIGHTED DECISION RETURN EQ, AND CORRESPONDING EQUALIZATION METHOD | |
CN107852343B (en) | HFC network fault positioning method, device and system | |
MX2013009921A (en) | Simultaneous detection of communications signals on all phases of a multi-phase power distribution network. | |
US20020176022A1 (en) | Methods and apparatus for removing NTSC signals from a digital television signal | |
Mertins | Frame analysis for biorthogonal cosine-modulated filterbanks | |
KR0134267B1 (en) | Improved method for cancelling ghost using least mean | |
Macchi et al. | An echo canceller with controlled power for frequency offset correction | |
US7362816B1 (en) | Inversion of channel distortion by adaptive wavelet lifting | |
JPH06188683A (en) | Adaptive digital filter | |
KR102229893B1 (en) | Method for RF over IP Linear Predictive coding and Nonlinear Quantization Fused Compression Transmission | |
JP5781683B2 (en) | Method and tool for automatically generating a limited set of spectrum and service profiles | |
Moulin et al. | Transform image coding based on joint adaptation of filter banks and tree structures | |
Iliev et al. | Adaptive blind noise suppression in some speech processing applications | |
Lin et al. | Robust decision-feedback equalizer design method under parameter perturbation in a transmission channel | |
KR100947724B1 (en) | Device for processing signal about cancellation of RFIradio frequency interference in VDSLvery high bit rate digital subscriber line modem | |
Kulkarni et al. | A comparative analysis of different methods for predicting speech in a noisy signal | |
Evangelista | Least mean squared error-design of complex FIR filters with quantized coefficients | |
US20070071338A1 (en) | Method or apparatus for processing performance data from a communications network | |
Shiraishi et al. | A Steady-State Analysis of a CORDIC-Based Adaptive ARMA Lattice Filter |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
XAS | Not any more in us assignment database |
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:BOOTH, TED NELSON;HOWALD, ROBERT L.;SIGNING DATES FROM 20030519 TO 20030523;REEL/FRAME:014211/0210 |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: GENERAL INSTRUMENT CORPORATION, PENNSYLVANIA Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:BOOTH, TED NELSON;HOWALD, ROBERT L.;REEL/FRAME:014343/0831;SIGNING DATES FROM 20030519 TO 20030523 Owner name: GENERAL INSTRUMENT CORPORATION,PENNSYLVANIA Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:BOOTH, TED NELSON;HOWALD, ROBERT L.;SIGNING DATES FROM 20030519 TO 20030523;REEL/FRAME:014343/0831 |
|
STCF | Information on status: patent grant |
Free format text: PATENTED CASE |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT, IL Free format text: SECURITY AGREEMENT;ASSIGNORS:ARRIS GROUP, INC.;ARRIS ENTERPRISES, INC.;ARRIS SOLUTIONS, INC.;AND OTHERS;REEL/FRAME:030498/0023 Effective date: 20130417 Owner name: BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT, ILLINOIS Free format text: SECURITY AGREEMENT;ASSIGNORS:ARRIS GROUP, INC.;ARRIS ENTERPRISES, INC.;ARRIS SOLUTIONS, INC.;AND OTHERS;REEL/FRAME:030498/0023 Effective date: 20130417 |
|
FPAY | Fee payment |
Year of fee payment: 4 |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: ARRIS TECHNOLOGY, INC., GEORGIA Free format text: MERGER AND CHANGE OF NAME;ASSIGNOR:GENERAL INSTRUMENT CORPORATION;REEL/FRAME:035176/0620 Effective date: 20150101 Owner name: ARRIS TECHNOLOGY, INC., GEORGIA Free format text: MERGER AND CHANGE OF NAME;ASSIGNORS:GENERAL INSTRUMENT CORPORATION;GENERAL INSTRUMENT CORPORATION;REEL/FRAME:035176/0620 Effective date: 20150101 |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: ARRIS ENTERPRISES, INC., GEORGIA Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:ARRIS TECHNOLOGY, INC;REEL/FRAME:037328/0341 Effective date: 20151214 |
|
MAFP | Maintenance fee payment |
Free format text: PAYMENT OF MAINTENANCE FEE, 8TH YEAR, LARGE ENTITY (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: M1552) Year of fee payment: 8 |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: ARRIS SOLUTIONS, INC., PENNSYLVANIA Free format text: TERMINATION AND RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST IN PATENTS;ASSIGNOR:BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT;REEL/FRAME:048825/0294 Effective date: 20190404 Owner name: LEAPSTONE SYSTEMS, INC., PENNSYLVANIA Free format text: TERMINATION AND RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST IN PATENTS;ASSIGNOR:BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT;REEL/FRAME:048825/0294 Effective date: 20190404 Owner name: ARRIS KOREA, INC., PENNSYLVANIA Free format text: TERMINATION AND RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST IN PATENTS;ASSIGNOR:BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT;REEL/FRAME:048825/0294 Effective date: 20190404 Owner name: THE GI REALTY TRUST 1996, PENNSYLVANIA Free format text: TERMINATION AND RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST IN PATENTS;ASSIGNOR:BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT;REEL/FRAME:048825/0294 Effective date: 20190404 Owner name: GIC INTERNATIONAL HOLDCO LLC, PENNSYLVANIA Free format text: TERMINATION AND RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST IN PATENTS;ASSIGNOR:BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT;REEL/FRAME:048825/0294 Effective date: 20190404 Owner name: GENERAL INSTRUMENT CORPORATION, PENNSYLVANIA Free format text: TERMINATION AND RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST IN PATENTS;ASSIGNOR:BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT;REEL/FRAME:048825/0294 Effective date: 20190404 Owner name: SUNUP DESIGN SYSTEMS, INC., PENNSYLVANIA Free format text: TERMINATION AND RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST IN PATENTS;ASSIGNOR:BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT;REEL/FRAME:048825/0294 Effective date: 20190404 Owner name: ACADIA AIC, INC., PENNSYLVANIA Free format text: TERMINATION AND RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST IN PATENTS;ASSIGNOR:BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT;REEL/FRAME:048825/0294 Effective date: 20190404 Owner name: CCE SOFTWARE LLC, PENNSYLVANIA Free format text: TERMINATION AND RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST IN PATENTS;ASSIGNOR:BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT;REEL/FRAME:048825/0294 Effective date: 20190404 Owner name: IMEDIA CORPORATION, PENNSYLVANIA Free format text: TERMINATION AND RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST IN PATENTS;ASSIGNOR:BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT;REEL/FRAME:048825/0294 Effective date: 20190404 Owner name: GIC INTERNATIONAL CAPITAL LLC, PENNSYLVANIA Free format text: TERMINATION AND RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST IN PATENTS;ASSIGNOR:BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT;REEL/FRAME:048825/0294 Effective date: 20190404 Owner name: 4HOME, INC., PENNSYLVANIA Free format text: TERMINATION AND RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST IN PATENTS;ASSIGNOR:BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT;REEL/FRAME:048825/0294 Effective date: 20190404 Owner name: AEROCAST, INC., PENNSYLVANIA Free format text: TERMINATION AND RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST IN PATENTS;ASSIGNOR:BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT;REEL/FRAME:048825/0294 Effective date: 20190404 Owner name: JERROLD DC RADIO, INC., PENNSYLVANIA Free format text: TERMINATION AND RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST IN PATENTS;ASSIGNOR:BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT;REEL/FRAME:048825/0294 Effective date: 20190404 Owner name: QUANTUM BRIDGE COMMUNICATIONS, INC., PENNSYLVANIA Free format text: TERMINATION AND RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST IN PATENTS;ASSIGNOR:BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT;REEL/FRAME:048825/0294 Effective date: 20190404 Owner name: TEXSCAN CORPORATION, PENNSYLVANIA Free format text: TERMINATION AND RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST IN PATENTS;ASSIGNOR:BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT;REEL/FRAME:048825/0294 Effective date: 20190404 Owner name: POWER GUARD, INC., PENNSYLVANIA Free format text: TERMINATION AND RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST IN PATENTS;ASSIGNOR:BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT;REEL/FRAME:048825/0294 Effective date: 20190404 Owner name: NETOPIA, INC., PENNSYLVANIA Free format text: TERMINATION AND RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST IN PATENTS;ASSIGNOR:BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT;REEL/FRAME:048825/0294 Effective date: 20190404 Owner name: NEXTLEVEL SYSTEMS (PUERTO RICO), INC., PENNSYLVANI Free format text: TERMINATION AND RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST IN PATENTS;ASSIGNOR:BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT;REEL/FRAME:048825/0294 Effective date: 20190404 Owner name: UCENTRIC SYSTEMS, INC., PENNSYLVANIA Free format text: TERMINATION AND RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST IN PATENTS;ASSIGNOR:BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT;REEL/FRAME:048825/0294 Effective date: 20190404 Owner name: MOTOROLA WIRELINE NETWORKS, INC., PENNSYLVANIA Free format text: TERMINATION AND RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST IN PATENTS;ASSIGNOR:BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT;REEL/FRAME:048825/0294 Effective date: 20190404 Owner name: ARRIS GROUP, INC., PENNSYLVANIA Free format text: TERMINATION AND RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST IN PATENTS;ASSIGNOR:BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT;REEL/FRAME:048825/0294 Effective date: 20190404 Owner name: ARRIS HOLDINGS CORP. OF ILLINOIS, INC., PENNSYLVAN Free format text: TERMINATION AND RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST IN PATENTS;ASSIGNOR:BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT;REEL/FRAME:048825/0294 Effective date: 20190404 Owner name: BROADBUS TECHNOLOGIES, INC., PENNSYLVANIA Free format text: TERMINATION AND RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST IN PATENTS;ASSIGNOR:BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT;REEL/FRAME:048825/0294 Effective date: 20190404 Owner name: GENERAL INSTRUMENT INTERNATIONAL HOLDINGS, INC., P Free format text: TERMINATION AND RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST IN PATENTS;ASSIGNOR:BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT;REEL/FRAME:048825/0294 Effective date: 20190404 Owner name: GENERAL INSTRUMENT AUTHORIZATION SERVICES, INC., P Free format text: TERMINATION AND RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST IN PATENTS;ASSIGNOR:BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT;REEL/FRAME:048825/0294 Effective date: 20190404 Owner name: SETJAM, INC., PENNSYLVANIA Free format text: TERMINATION AND RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST IN PATENTS;ASSIGNOR:BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT;REEL/FRAME:048825/0294 Effective date: 20190404 Owner name: BIG BAND NETWORKS, INC., PENNSYLVANIA Free format text: TERMINATION AND RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST IN PATENTS;ASSIGNOR:BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT;REEL/FRAME:048825/0294 Effective date: 20190404 Owner name: MODULUS VIDEO, INC., PENNSYLVANIA Free format text: TERMINATION AND RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST IN PATENTS;ASSIGNOR:BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT;REEL/FRAME:048825/0294 Effective date: 20190404 Owner name: ARRIS ENTERPRISES, INC., PENNSYLVANIA Free format text: TERMINATION AND RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST IN PATENTS;ASSIGNOR:BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT;REEL/FRAME:048825/0294 Effective date: 20190404 Owner name: GENERAL INSTRUMENT AUTHORIZATION SERVICES, INC., PENNSYLVANIA Free format text: TERMINATION AND RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST IN PATENTS;ASSIGNOR:BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT;REEL/FRAME:048825/0294 Effective date: 20190404 Owner name: NEXTLEVEL SYSTEMS (PUERTO RICO), INC., PENNSYLVANIA Free format text: TERMINATION AND RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST IN PATENTS;ASSIGNOR:BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT;REEL/FRAME:048825/0294 Effective date: 20190404 Owner name: GENERAL INSTRUMENT INTERNATIONAL HOLDINGS, INC., PENNSYLVANIA Free format text: TERMINATION AND RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST IN PATENTS;ASSIGNOR:BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT;REEL/FRAME:048825/0294 Effective date: 20190404 Owner name: ARRIS HOLDINGS CORP. OF ILLINOIS, INC., PENNSYLVANIA Free format text: TERMINATION AND RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST IN PATENTS;ASSIGNOR:BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT;REEL/FRAME:048825/0294 Effective date: 20190404 |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: ARRIS ENTERPRISES LLC, GEORGIA Free format text: CHANGE OF NAME;ASSIGNOR:ARRIS ENTERPRISES, INC.;REEL/FRAME:049649/0062 Effective date: 20151231 |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: WILMINGTON TRUST, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS COLLATE Free format text: PATENT SECURITY AGREEMENT;ASSIGNOR:ARRIS ENTERPRISES LLC;REEL/FRAME:049820/0495 Effective date: 20190404 Owner name: JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., NEW YORK Free format text: ABL SECURITY AGREEMENT;ASSIGNORS:COMMSCOPE, INC. OF NORTH CAROLINA;COMMSCOPE TECHNOLOGIES LLC;ARRIS ENTERPRISES LLC;AND OTHERS;REEL/FRAME:049892/0396 Effective date: 20190404 Owner name: JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., NEW YORK Free format text: TERM LOAN SECURITY AGREEMENT;ASSIGNORS:COMMSCOPE, INC. OF NORTH CAROLINA;COMMSCOPE TECHNOLOGIES LLC;ARRIS ENTERPRISES LLC;AND OTHERS;REEL/FRAME:049905/0504 Effective date: 20190404 Owner name: WILMINGTON TRUST, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS COLLATERAL AGENT, CONNECTICUT Free format text: PATENT SECURITY AGREEMENT;ASSIGNOR:ARRIS ENTERPRISES LLC;REEL/FRAME:049820/0495 Effective date: 20190404 |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: WILMINGTON TRUST, DELAWARE Free format text: SECURITY INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:ARRIS SOLUTIONS, INC.;ARRIS ENTERPRISES LLC;COMMSCOPE TECHNOLOGIES LLC;AND OTHERS;REEL/FRAME:060752/0001 Effective date: 20211115 |
|
LAPS | Lapse for failure to pay maintenance fees |
Free format text: PATENT EXPIRED FOR FAILURE TO PAY MAINTENANCE FEES (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: EXP.); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITY |
|
FEPP | Fee payment procedure |
Free format text: MAINTENANCE FEE REMINDER MAILED (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: REM.); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITY |
|
STCH | Information on status: patent discontinuation |
Free format text: PATENT EXPIRED DUE TO NONPAYMENT OF MAINTENANCE FEES UNDER 37 CFR 1.362 |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: ARRIS ENTERPRISES, INC., GEORGIA Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:ARRIS TECHNOLOGY, INC.;REEL/FRAME:060791/0583 Effective date: 20151214 |
|
FP | Lapsed due to failure to pay maintenance fee |
Effective date: 20220511 |