Recherche Images Maps Play YouTube Actualités Gmail Drive Plus »
Connexion
Les utilisateurs de lecteurs d'écran peuvent cliquer sur ce lien pour activer le mode d'accessibilité. Celui-ci propose les mêmes fonctionnalités principales, mais il est optimisé pour votre lecteur d'écran.

Brevets

  1. Recherche avancée dans les brevets
Numéro de publicationUS20050119999 A1
Type de publicationDemande
Numéro de demandeUS 10/935,906
Date de publication2 juin 2005
Date de dépôt7 sept. 2004
Date de priorité6 sept. 2003
Autre référence de publicationUS7634456, US7664730, US7664778, US7739263, US7747606, US7805411, US8825629, US8983934, US20050097091, US20050120000, US20050120001, US20050125393, US20050125398, US20050125427, US20050125452, US20050138015, US20050177557, US20050187917
Numéro de publication10935906, 935906, US 2005/0119999 A1, US 2005/119999 A1, US 20050119999 A1, US 20050119999A1, US 2005119999 A1, US 2005119999A1, US-A1-20050119999, US-A1-2005119999, US2005/0119999A1, US2005/119999A1, US20050119999 A1, US20050119999A1, US2005119999 A1, US2005119999A1
InventeursMohamed Zait, Benoit Dageville, Dinesh Das, Khaled Yagoub, Mohamed Ziauddin
Cessionnaire d'origineOracle International Corporation
Exporter la citationBiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan
Liens externes: USPTO, Cession USPTO, Espacenet
Automatic learning optimizer
US 20050119999 A1
Résumé
A method of gathering performance information about a workload, and automatically identifying a set of high-load database query language statements from the workload based on the performance information, is disclosed.
Images(6)
Previous page
Next page
Revendications(18)
1. A method comprising:
gathering performance information about a workload; and
automatically identifying a set of high-load database query language statements from the workload based on the performance information.
2. The method of claim 1, further comprising:
automatically generating tuning actions for each high-load statement.
3. The method of claim 2, further comprising:
automatically storing the tuning actions for each high-load statement in a profile.
4. The method of claim 3, further comprising:
persistently storing each profile in a tuning base.
5. The method of claim 4, further comprising:
receiving one of the high-load statements at a compiler;
retrieving the profile for the received statement from the tuning base; and
generating an execution plan for the statement with the profile.
6. The method of claim 1, wherein the database query language statement is a SQL statement.
7. A method comprising:
gathering performance information about a workload; and
automatically identifying a set of high-load database query language statements from the workload based on the performance information.
8. The method of claim 7, further comprising:
automatically generating tuning actions for each high-load SQL statement.
9. The method of claim 8, further comprising:
automatically storing the tuning actions for each high-load statement in a profile.
10. The method of claim 9, further comprising:
persistently storing each profile in a tuning base.
11. The method of claim 10, further comprising:
receiving one of the high-load statements at a compiler;
retrieving the profile for the received statement from the tuning base; and
generating an execution plan for the statement with the profile.
12. The method of claim 7, wherein the database query language statement is a SQL statement.
13. A method comprising:
gathering performance information about a workload; and
automatically identifying a set of high-load database query language statements from the workload based on the performance information.
14. The method of claim 13, further comprising:
automatically generating tuning actions for each high-load statement.
15. The method of claim 14, further comprising:
automatically storing the tuning actions for each high-load statement in a profile.
16. The method of claim 15, further comprising:
persistently storing each profile in a tuning base.
17. The method of claim 16, further comprising:
receiving one of the high-load statements at a compiler;
retrieving the profile for the received statement from the tuning base; and
generating an execution plan for the statement with the profile.
18. The method of claim 13, wherein the database query language statement is a SQL statement.
Description
    CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS
  • [0001]
    This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/500,490, filed Sep. 6, 2003, which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety. This application is related to co-pending applications “SQL TUNING SETS,” Ser. No. ______ Attorney Docket No. OI7036272001; “AUTO-TUNING SQL STATEMENTS,” Ser. No. ______ Attorney Docket No. OI7037042001; “SQL PROFILE,” Ser. No. ______ Attorney Docket No. OI7037052001; “GLOBAL HINTS,” Ser. No. ______ Attorney Docket No. OI7037062001; “SQL TUNING BASE,” Ser. No. ______ Attorney Docket No. OI7037072001; “AUTOMATIC PREVENTION OF RUN-AWAY QUERY EXECUTION,” Ser. No. ______ Attorney Docket No. OI7037092001; “METHOD FOR INDEX TUNING OF A SQL STATEMENT, AND INDEX MERGING FOR A MULTI-STATEMENT SQL WORKLOAD, USING A COST-BASED RELATIONAL QUERY OPTIMIZER,” Ser. No. ______ Attorney Docket No. OI7037102001; “SQL STRUCTURE ANALYZER,” Ser. No. ______ Attorney Docket No. OI7037112001; “HIGH-LOAD SQL DRIVEN STATISTICS COLLECTION,” Ser. No. ______ Attorney Docket No. OI7037122001; “AUTOMATIC SQL TUNING ADVISOR,” Ser. No. ______ Attorney Docket No. OI7037132001, all of which are filed Sep. 7, 2004 and are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety.
  • FIELD OF THE INVENTION
  • [0002]
    This invention is related to the field of electronic database management systems.
  • BACKGROUND
  • [0003]
    SQL tuning is a critical aspect of database performance tuning. It is an inherently complex activity requiring a high level of expertise in several domains: query optimization, to improve the execution plan selected by the query optimizer; access design, to identify missing access structures; and SQL design, to restructure and simplify the text of a badly written SQL statement. Furthermore, SQL tuning is a time consuming task due to the large volume and evolving nature of the SQL workload and its underlying data.
  • [0004]
    Over the past decade two clear trends have occurred: (a) the database systems have been deployed in new areas, such as electronic commerce, bringing a new set of database requirements, and, (b) the database applications have become increasingly complex with support for very large numbers of concurrent users. As a result, the performance of database systems has become highly visible and thus critical to the success of the businesses running these applications. For example, database systems continue to be deployed in new areas, such as electronic commerce, and the database applications have increasingly become sophisticated to support more users and provide more functionalities, making the query optimization task more complex.
  • [0005]
    The database system vendors deal with this increased complexity by enhancing the optimizer capabilities to deal with new SQL constructs, add better searching techniques, or a richer cost model. While this conventional approach can solve some problems, it is not capable to deal with the dynamic nature of the database application, e.g., dynamic changes in the application workload. Indeed the conventional optimizer will always face situations where mistakes are unavoidable. For example, the optimizer can lack of information about the objects accessed by a SQL statement. The optimizer logic may also not be prepared to deal with certain kinds of problems.
  • SUMMARY
  • [0006]
    An automatic learning optimizer is able to automatically tune a database query language statement by automatically identifying high load or top database query language statements that are responsible for a large share of the application workload and system resources based on the past database query language statement execution history available in the system, automatically generating ways to improve execution plans produced by a compiler for these statements, and automatically performing corrective actions to generate better execution plans for poorly performing statements.
  • BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
  • [0007]
    FIG. 1 shows an example of the Automatic Learning Optimizer architecture.
  • [0008]
    FIG. 2 shows an example of the process flow of the auto-learning process.
  • [0009]
    FIG. 3 represents another exemplary illustration of the automatic learning optimizer device.
  • [0010]
    FIG. 4 shows another example of a system to perform the auto-learning process for database system management.
  • [0011]
    FIG. 5 is a block diagram of a computer system suitable for implementing an embodiment of coverage computation for verification.
  • DETAILED DESCRIPTION
  • [0000]
    Overview
  • [0012]
    The embodiments of the invention are described using the term “SQL”, however, the invention is not limited to just this exact database query language, and indeed may be used in conjunction with other database query languages and constructs.
  • [0013]
    An automatic learning optimizer has learning capabilities that make it able to learn from past execution history of SQL statements which can be repeated in the future. For example, a database application is often repetitive, i.e., the same SQL statements are submitted over and over, some more frequently than others. Information about these statements can be collected from various sources, e.g., execution statistics for some or all operations of the query execution plan (number of output rows, amount of memory, number of disk reads), or the caching ratio of the database objects.
  • [0014]
    An auto-learning capability for the auto-tuning optimizer provides a component of a fully self-managed database system. The auto-learning optimizer can execute a background task which identifies potential optimizer mistakes made for a target SQL statement, and automatically produce optimizer corrective actions. Hence, the auto-learning optimizer can gradually repair the suboptimal executions plans run by the database system.
  • [0015]
    The auto-learning process starts by identifying a small subset of SQL statements which are potential candidates for auto-learning. For example, this subset may correspond to all SQL statements which are known to have a suboptimal execution plan and a high impact on the overall performance of the system. Alternatively, the auto-learning detection mechanism may focus on the subset of high-load SQL statements. Once the set of high-load SQL statements has been identified, the auto-learning optimizer can uncover its mistakes by analyzing each SQL statement in the set. Based on this analysis, if optimizer related problems are then found, corrective actions are produced and stored in a computer readable medium, such as a disk. Because the corrective actions are permanently stored, the auto-learning optimizer can perform an iterative learning process which accumulates, over time, more and more knowledge on problematic queries, and also prevents the corrected problems from recurring.
  • [0016]
    In one embodiment, the auto-learning optimizer performs the auto-tuning function to generate the corrective actions and store them in SQL Profiles. Hence, corrective actions are automatically placed in one or more profiles, which are stored in the tuning base. The auto-learning process may be on-line, with the auto-learning process running almost continuously as a background task. In this mode, high-load SQL statements stored in the cursor cache are targeted. Hence, the on-line mode can address critical SQL tuning issues while having a very low overhead on the system performance.
  • [0017]
    In another embodiment, the auto-learning optimizer performs learning off-line. In this mode, the auto-learning process is executed during the maintenance window as an automated manageability task. This off-line mode can have more time and system resources to perform the auto-tuning functions. Hence, the auto-learning optimizer can have time to refresh corrective actions produced in the past, and auto tune less critical SQL statements.
  • [0018]
    FIG. 1 shows an example of the auto-learning optimizer feedback loop process for the on-line auto-learning optimizer. The on-line auto-learning background process is performed by the auto-learning optimizer 110, which identifies the set of high-load SQL statements from the cursor cache 120. This can be achieved by keeping, for each cursor in the cache, a record of the total elapsed time accumulated since the last auto-learning cycle. When an auto-learning cycle starts, cursors in the cache can be ranked based on this cumulative elapsed time metric. The auto tune process is then applied to each cursor in their ranking order. For example, in one embodiment, cursors which account for more than 1% of the total cumulated elapsed time are considered by the auto-learning optimizer 110.
  • [0019]
    The auto-learning optimizer 110 can also auto tune recurring cursors with a long average elapsed time, even when their cumulated elapsed time is not necessarily high, because these cursors could negatively affect the response time of individual end users even if their overall impact on the system performance is limited. A ranking procedure can be used for these cursors by ranking them based on the average elapsed time (instead of the cumulative elapsed time).
  • [0020]
    The auto-tuning process may skip cursors which have not been executed more than once since they have been first loaded in the cursor cache, in order to prevent the auto-learning process from spending time on non recurring cursors (e.g. ad-hoc queries). Also, cursors with hintsets or outlines already defined on them may be skipped, since these cursors have been tuned already.
  • [0021]
    Once the set of cursors to auto tune is identified, the auto-learning optimizer starts the learning process. This process can run continuously in the background, up to the beginning of the next auto-learning cycle, which reduces the overall impact on the system. This background task may be accomplished by pacing each auto tune execution based on the total load of the system. Profiles produced for each auto-tuned statement may be stored in the Tuning base, even if no corrective actions have been produced. In that case, a VOID profile may be generated to keep track of statements which have been auto tuned.
  • [0022]
    Once a SQL statement is auto tuned, the learned corrective actions (i.e. a profile) are permanently stored in the Tuning base 130. The next execution of that statement will automatically trigger a hard parse, except when the associated hintset is ‘VOID’. When the statement is recompiled, the query optimizer 140 takes into account the extra knowledge carried by the profile to generate an improved execution plan.
  • [0023]
    The execution plan produced by optimizer 130 is sent to the cursor cache 120, which closes the auto-learning feedback loop. The statements that have been improved by the auto-learning optimizer then have execution plans that are no longer high-load. They drop out of the set of high-load SQL identified by the auto-learning optimizer 110, because they are no longer high-load, or because a tuning profile now exists for them. As the automatic learning process continues, the formerly lesser high-load statements will grow in rank to the point that they now become targets for auto-learning optimization process. With a stable SQL workload, the system can rapidly converge with all high-load statements auto-tuned.
  • [0024]
    An example of a method of performing the on-line auto-learning process is shown in FIG. 2. High load SQL statements are identified, 210. The high load statements are ranked based on a performance metric, such as execution time, 220. Each high load statement is tuned by the automatic tuning optimizer based on its rank, 230. A profile of tuning actions is created for the high load statement, 240, which is stored in a tuning base, 250. A query optimizer generates an execution plan for the statement using the profile from the tuning base, 260.
  • [0025]
    The off-line auto-learning process can be performed by the auto-learning optimizer system as shown in FIG. 3. Workload information is automatically captured at regular interval, by default once every 30 minutes, from the cursor cache 310 by snapshot collector 320, and placed in the workload repository 330. The off-line functions of the auto-learning process can be executed as an automated manageability task, scheduled to be performed within the maintenance window. For example, a database administrator (DBA) can define that automatic manageability actions (e.g. index rebuild, space coalesce, auto analyze, auto learn) are to be executed at night from 10 pm to 6 am.
  • [0026]
    The snapshot collection of the cursor cache can be performed by collector 310 at regular intervals, such as every 30 minutes, to snapshot performance statistics, and save them in the workload repository 330, to capture information on high-load SQL. For example, the information on SQL that can be saved in the repository can include data to auto-tune the statement at a later time.
  • [0027]
    The high load SQL statements can be tuned within the maintenance window by the auto-learning optimizer 390. The high load extractor 340 identifies high load statements and retrieves the information on the high-load SQL statements captured in the workload repository 330 since the last off-line auto-learning session. A SQL Tuning Set (STS) 350 is created to store the set of high-load SQL statements. These statements can be ranked using their cumulative elapsed time, and/or high average elapse time. Each statement in the STS is auto-tuned in ranked order by the auto-tuning optimizer 360. If a statement has been recently auto-tuned, it can be skipped. Once a SQL statement is auto tuned, the learned corrective actions (i.e. a profile) are permanently stored in the Tuning base 370, and retrieved by the query optimizer 380 to generate a well tuned execution plan for the statement.
  • [0028]
    The auto-learning optimizer can optimize and execute an ad-hoc SQL statement the first time it comes into the system. The auto-learning optimizer can do this by learning about important properties of SQL statements such that the information learned from one statement can be used for another statement. For example, by analyzing the set of high-load SQL statements, the auto-learning optimizer can detect data skew between two columns and use this information to generate appropriate statistics such as either a multi-column histogram or a multi-dimensional histogram. Because the information learned from the ad-hoc SQL can become excessively large, making it impractical to collect the corresponding statistics, the past SQL execution history is used to identify and weed out many of the SQL properties that offer either one-time or insignificant performance gains.
  • [0029]
    FIG. 4 shows an example of the auto-learning optimizer system with a feedback loop for automatically learning tuning information on an ad hoc SQL statement basis. The cursor cache 410 is examined by the snapshot collector 420 to gather information that is stored in the workload repository 430. Using SQL information collected in the workload repository, the extractor 450 identifies high load statements and places them in a STS 460. The auto-learning optimizer 440 determines the appropriate set of complex statistics (like multi-column and multi-table histograms, predicate statistics, . . . ) to collect and refresh. The refreshed statistics 470 are added to the complex data statistics 480, which are then used by the query optimizer 490 to generate an execution plan for a SQL statement. The ad-hoc auto-learning process is therefore able to increase the number of statements in the SQL workload whose execution plans would benefit from these extra statistics while limiting the cost (time to collect and time to refresh) for these extra statistics.
  • [0030]
    According to one embodiment of the invention, computer system 500 performs specific operations by processor 504 executing one or more sequences of one or more instructions contained in system memory 506. Such instructions may be read into system memory 506 from another computer readable medium, such as static storage device 508 or disk drive 510. In alternative embodiments, hard-wired circuitry may be used in place of or in combination with software instructions to implement the invention.
  • [0031]
    The term “computer readable medium” as used herein refers to any medium that participates in providing instructions to processor 504 for execution. Such a medium may take many forms, including but not limited to, non-volatile media, volatile media, and transmission media. Non-volatile media includes, for example, optical or magnetic disks, such as disk drive 510. Volatile media includes dynamic memory, such as system memory 506. Transmission media includes coaxial cables, copper wire, and fiber optics, including wires that comprise bus 502. Transmission media can also take the form of acoustic or light waves, such as those generated during radio wave and infrared data communications.
  • [0032]
    Common forms of computer readable media includes, for example, floppy disk, flexible disk, hard disk, magnetic tape, any other magnetic medium, CD-ROM, any other optical medium, punch cards, paper tape, any other physical medium with patterns of holes, RAM, PROM, EPROM, FLASH-EPROM, any other memory chip or cartridge, carrier wave, or any other medium from which a computer can read.
  • [0033]
    In an embodiment of the invention, execution of the sequences of instructions to practice the invention is performed by a single computer system 500. According to other embodiments of the invention, two or more computer systems 500 coupled by communication link 520 (e.g., LAN, PTSN, or wireless network) may perform the sequence of instructions to practice the invention in coordination with one another. Computer system 500 may transmit and receive messages, data, and instructions, including program, i.e., application code, through communication link 520 and communication interface 512. Received program code may be executed by processor 504 as it is received, and/or stored in disk drive 510, or other non-volatile storage for later execution.
  • [0034]
    In the foregoing specification, the invention has been described with reference to specific embodiments thereof. It will, however, be evident that various modifications and changes may be made thereto without departing from the broader spirit and scope of the invention. The specification and drawings are, accordingly, to be regarded in an illustrative rather than restrictive sense.
Citations de brevets
Brevet cité Date de dépôt Date de publication Déposant Titre
US5140685 *16 sept. 199118 août 1992Unisys CorporationRecord lock processing for multiprocessing data system with majority voting
US5260697 *13 nov. 19909 nov. 1993Wang Laboratories, Inc.Computer with separate display plane and user interface processor
US5398183 *10 déc. 199014 mars 1995Biomedical Systems CorporationHolter ECG report generating system
US5408653 *15 avr. 199218 avr. 1995International Business Machines CorporationEfficient data base access using a shared electronic store in a multi-system environment with shared disks
US5481712 *6 avr. 19932 janv. 1996Cognex CorporationMethod and apparatus for interactively generating a computer program for machine vision analysis of an object
US5504917 *14 janv. 19942 avr. 1996National Instruments CorporationMethod and apparatus for providing picture generation and control features in a graphical data flow environment
US5544355 *14 juin 19936 août 1996Hewlett-Packard CompanyMethod and apparatus for query optimization in a relational database system having foreign functions
US5577240 *7 déc. 199419 nov. 1996Xerox CorporationIdentification of stable writes in weakly consistent replicated databases while providing access to all writes in such a database
US5634134 *19 juin 199227 mai 1997Hitachi, Ltd.Method and apparatus for determining character and character mode for multi-lingual keyboard based on input characters
US5737601 *16 janv. 19977 avr. 1998Oracle CorporationMethod and apparatus for peer-to-peer data replication including handling exceptional occurrences
US5761660 *1 août 19962 juin 1998International Business Machines CorporationComputer program product and program storage device for database access using a shared electronic store in a multi-system environment having shared disks
US5765159 *21 mai 19979 juin 1998International Business Machines CorporationSystem and method for generating an optimized set of relational queries for fetching data from a relational database management system in response to object queries received from an object oriented environment
US5781912 *19 déc. 199614 juil. 1998Oracle CorporationRecoverable data replication between source site and destination site without distributed transactions
US5794229 *11 déc. 199511 août 1998Sybase, Inc.Database system with methodology for storing a database table by vertically partitioning all columns of the table
US5806076 *29 oct. 19968 sept. 1998Oracle CorporationTracking dependencies between transactions in a database
US5860069 *11 avr. 199712 janv. 1999Bmc Software, Inc.Method of efficient collection of SQL performance measures
US5870760 *19 déc. 19969 févr. 1999Oracle CorporationDequeuing using queue batch numbers
US5870761 *19 déc. 19969 févr. 1999Oracle CorporationParallel queue propagation
US5940826 *7 janv. 199717 août 1999Unisys CorporationDual XPCS for disaster recovery in multi-host computer complexes
US5991765 *6 mai 199723 nov. 1999Birdstep Technology AsSystem and method for storing and manipulating data in an information handling system
US6052694 *18 mars 199818 avr. 2000Electronic Data Systems CorporationMethod and apparatus for logging database performance characteristics
US6122640 *22 sept. 199819 sept. 2000Platinum Technology Ip, Inc.Method and apparatus for reorganizing an active DBMS table
US6195653 *13 janv. 200027 févr. 2001International Business Machines CorporationSystem and method for selectively preparing customized reports of query explain data
US6275818 *5 nov. 199814 août 2001International Business Machines CorporationCost based optimization of decision support queries using transient views
US6321218 *24 févr. 199920 nov. 2001Oracle CorporationAutomatically determining data that is best suited for index tuning
US6330552 *28 sept. 199811 déc. 2001CompaqDatabase query cost model optimizer
US6349310 *6 juil. 199919 févr. 2002Compaq Computer CorporationDatabase management system and method for accessing rows in a partitioned table
US6353818 *19 août 19985 mars 2002Ncr CorporationPlan-per-tuple optimizing of database queries with user-defined functions
US6356889 *30 sept. 199912 mars 2002International Business Machines CorporationMethod for determining optimal database materializations using a query optimizer
US6374257 *16 juin 199916 avr. 2002Oracle CorporationMethod and system for removing ambiguities in a shared database command
US6397207 *2 nov. 200028 mai 2002International Business Machines Corp.System and method for selectively preparing customized reports of query explain data
US6397227 *6 juil. 199928 mai 2002Compaq Computer CorporationDatabase management system and method for updating specified tuple fields upon transaction rollback
US6434545 *16 déc. 199813 août 2002Microsoft CorporationGraphical query analyzer
US6434568 *31 août 199913 août 2002Accenture LlpInformation services patterns in a netcentric environment
US6442748 *31 août 199927 août 2002Accenture LlpSystem, method and article of manufacture for a persistent state and persistent object separator in an information services patterns environment
US6460027 *14 sept. 19981 oct. 2002International Business Machines CorporationAutomatic recognition and rerouting of queries for optimal performance
US6460043 *26 févr. 19991 oct. 2002Microsoft CorporationMethod and apparatus for operating on data with a conceptual data manipulation language
US6493701 *5 juil. 200110 déc. 2002Sybase, Inc.Database system with methodogy providing faster N-ary nested loop joins
US6496850 *31 août 199917 déc. 2002Accenture LlpClean-up of orphaned server contexts
US6513029 *1 août 200028 janv. 2003Microsoft CorporationInteresting table-subset selection for database workload materialized view selection
US6529901 *25 févr. 20004 mars 2003Microsoft CorporationAutomating statistics management for query optimizers
US6560606 *4 mai 19996 mai 2003MetratechMethod and apparatus for processing data with multiple processing modules and associated counters
US6615223 *29 févr. 20002 sept. 2003Oracle International CorporationMethod and system for data replication
US6714943 *31 janv. 200130 mars 2004Oracle International CorporationMethod and mechanism for tracking dependencies for referential integrity constrained tables
US6721724 *31 mars 200013 avr. 2004Microsoft CorporationValidating multiple execution plans for database queries
US6728719 *31 janv. 200127 avr. 2004Oracle International CorporationMethod and mechanism for dependency tracking for unique constraints
US6728720 *13 juin 200027 avr. 2004Robert Stephen Gerard LenzieIdentifying preferred indexes for databases
US6744449 *11 juin 20021 juin 2004Microsoft CorporationGraphical query analyzer
US6763353 *31 oct. 200113 juil. 2004Vitria Technology, Inc.Real time business process analysis method and apparatus
US6804672 *31 janv. 200112 oct. 2004Oracle International CorporationMethod and mechanism for dependency tracking
US6816874 *10 sept. 19999 nov. 2004International Business Machines CorporationMethod, system, and program for accessing performance data
US6839713 *12 juil. 20014 janv. 2005Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.System and software for database structure in semiconductor manufacturing and method thereof
US6865567 *19 janv. 20008 mars 2005Basantkumar John OommenMethod of generating attribute cardinality maps
US6910109 *30 sept. 199821 juin 2005Intel CorporationTracking memory page state
US6912547 *26 juin 200228 juin 2005Microsoft CorporationCompressing database workloads
US6934701 *4 janv. 200023 août 2005International Business Machines CorporationUsing a stored procedure to access index configuration data in a remote database management system
US6947927 *9 juil. 200220 sept. 2005Microsoft CorporationMethod and apparatus for exploiting statistics on query expressions for optimization
US6961931 *10 janv. 20011 nov. 2005International Business Machines CorporationDependency specification using target patterns
US7080062 *11 févr. 200018 juil. 2006International Business Machines CorporationOptimizing database queries using query execution plans derived from automatic summary table determining cost based queries
US7139749 *24 févr. 200321 nov. 2006International Business Machines CorporationMethod, system, and program for performance tuning a database query
US7617201 *20 juin 200110 nov. 2009Microstrategy, IncorporatedSystem and method for analyzing statistics in a reporting system
US20020120617 *24 juil. 200129 août 2002Fujitsu LimitedDatabase retrieving method, apparatus and storage medium thereof
US20020198867 *6 juin 200126 déc. 2002International Business Machines CorporationLearning from empirical results in query optimization
US20030018618 *15 mars 200123 janv. 2003International Business Machines CorporationRepresentation for data used in query optimization
US20030065648 *3 oct. 20013 avr. 2003International Business Machines CorporationReduce database monitor workload by employing predictive query threshold
US20030088541 *21 juin 20028 mai 2003Zilio Daniel C.Method for recommending indexes and materialized views for a database workload
US20030093408 *12 oct. 200115 mai 2003Brown Douglas P.Index selection in a database system
US20030110153 *11 déc. 200112 juin 2003Sprint Communications Company L.P.Database performance monitoring method and tool
US20030115183 *13 déc. 200119 juin 2003International Business Machines CorporationEstimation and use of access plan statistics
US20030126143 *31 mai 20023 juil. 2003Nicholas RoussopoulosDwarf cube architecture for reducing storage sizes of multidimensional data
US20030130985 *17 déc. 200210 juil. 2003Volker DriesenSystems, methods and articles of manufacture for upgrading a database with a shadow system
US20030135478 *31 mai 200217 juil. 2003Computer Associates Think, Inc.Method and system for online reorganization of databases
US20030154216 *14 févr. 200214 août 2003International Business Machines CorporationDatabase optimization apparatus and method
US20030177137 *11 juin 200218 sept. 2003Microsoft CorporationGraphical query analyzer
US20030182276 *24 févr. 200325 sept. 2003International Business Machines CorporationMethod, system, and program for performance tuning a database query
US20030187831 *29 mars 20022 oct. 2003International Business Machines CorporationDatabase query optimizer framework with dynamic strategy dispatch
US20030200537 *18 avr. 200223 oct. 2003International Business Machines CorporationApparatus and method for using database knowledge to optimize a computer program
US20030229621 *29 août 200211 déc. 2003International Business Machines CorporationApparatus and method for refreshing a database query
US20030229639 *7 juin 200211 déc. 2003International Business Machines CorporationRuntime query optimization for dynamically selecting from multiple plans in a query based upon runtime-evaluated performance criterion
US20040002957 *28 juin 20021 janv. 2004Microsoft CorporationLinear programming approach to assigning benefit to database physical design structures
US20040003004 *28 juin 20021 janv. 2004Microsoft CorporationTime-bound database tuning
US20040019587 *16 avr. 200329 janv. 2004You-Chin FuhMethod and device for processing a query in a database management system
US20040034643 *19 août 200219 févr. 2004International Business Machines CorporationSystem and method for real time statistics collection for use in the automatic management of a database system
US20040181521 *24 mars 200416 sept. 2004Simmen David E.Query optimization technique for obtaining improved cardinality estimates using statistics on pre-defined queries
US20040215626 *9 avr. 200328 oct. 2004International Business Machines CorporationMethod, system, and program for improving performance of database queries
US20050033734 *5 août 200310 févr. 2005International Business Machines CorporationPerformance prediction system with query mining
US20050097078 *31 oct. 20035 mai 2005Lohman Guy M.System, method, and computer program product for progressive query processing
US20050097091 *7 sept. 20045 mai 2005Oracle International CorporationSQL tuning base
US20050102305 *8 déc. 200412 mai 2005Microsoft CorporationCompressing database workloads
US20050120000 *7 sept. 20042 juin 2005Oracle International CorporationAuto-tuning SQL statements
US20050120001 *7 sept. 20042 juin 2005Oracle International CorporationSQL structure analyzer
US20050125393 *7 sept. 20049 juin 2005Oracle International CorporationSQL tuning sets
US20050125398 *7 sept. 20049 juin 2005Oracle International CorporationGlobal hints
US20050125427 *7 sept. 20049 juin 2005Oracle International CorporationAutomatic SQL tuning advisor
US20050125452 *7 sept. 20049 juin 2005Oracle International CorporationSQL profile
US20050138015 *7 sept. 200423 juin 2005Oracle International CorporationHigh load SQL driven statistics collection
US20050177557 *7 sept. 200411 août 2005Oracle International CorporationAutomatic prevention of run-away query execution
US20050187917 *7 sept. 200425 août 2005Oracle International CorporationMethod for index tuning of a SQL statement, and index merging for a multi-statement SQL workload, using a cost-based relational query optimizer
US20050251523 *7 mai 200410 nov. 2005Oracle International CorporationMinimizing downtime for application changes in database systems
US20060004828 *14 mai 20045 janv. 2006Oracle International CorporationFiner grain dependency tracking for database objects
Référencé par
Brevet citant Date de dépôt Date de publication Déposant Titre
US7574424 *13 oct. 200411 août 2009Sybase, Inc.Database system with methodology for parallel schedule generation in a query optimizer
US76647307 sept. 200416 févr. 2010Oracle International CorporationMethod and system for implementing a SQL profile
US76647787 sept. 200416 févr. 2010Oracle International CorporationSQL tuning sets
US7689550 *31 juil. 200730 mars 2010Oracle International CorporationAdaptive cursor sharing
US7702623 *31 juil. 200720 avr. 2010Oracle International CorporationExtended cursor sharing
US772546518 avr. 200725 mai 2010Oracle International CorporationDocument date as a ranking factor for crawling
US77392637 sept. 200415 juin 2010Oracle International CorporationGlobal hints
US775722617 mars 200413 juil. 2010Oracle International CorporationMethod and mechanism for performing a rolling upgrade of distributed computer software
US778828514 mai 200431 août 2010Oracle International CorporationFiner grain dependency tracking for database objects
US78054117 sept. 200428 sept. 2010Oracle International CorporationAuto-tuning SQL statements
US7840556 *31 juil. 200723 nov. 2010Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P.Managing performance of a database query
US794141928 févr. 200710 mai 2011Oracle International CorporationSuggested content with attribute parameterization
US799639227 juin 20079 août 2011Oracle International CorporationChanging ranking algorithms based on customer settings
US800581628 févr. 200723 août 2011Oracle International CorporationAuto generation of suggested links in a search system
US8027982 *28 févr. 200727 sept. 2011Oracle International CorporationSelf-service sources for secure search
US821439428 févr. 20073 juil. 2012Oracle International CorporationPropagating user identities in a secure federated search system
US823941418 mai 20117 août 2012Oracle International CorporationRe-ranking search results from an enterprise system
US831600728 juin 200720 nov. 2012Oracle International CorporationAutomatically finding acronyms and synonyms in a corpus
US833243028 févr. 200711 déc. 2012Oracle International CorporationSecure search performance improvement
US83524754 avr. 20118 janv. 2013Oracle International CorporationSuggested content with attribute parameterization
US841271727 juin 20112 avr. 2013Oracle International CorporationChanging ranking algorithms based on customer settings
US843371228 févr. 200730 avr. 2013Oracle International CorporationLink analysis for enterprise environment
US857787131 mars 20085 nov. 2013Oracle International CorporationMethod and mechanism for out-of-the-box real-time SQL monitoring
US859525530 mai 201226 nov. 2013Oracle International CorporationPropagating user identities in a secure federated search system
US860102828 juin 20123 déc. 2013Oracle International CorporationCrawling secure data sources
US86267942 juil. 20127 janv. 2014Oracle International CorporationIndexing secure enterprise documents using generic references
US870745128 févr. 200722 avr. 2014Oracle International CorporationSearch hit URL modification for secure application integration
US872577014 nov. 201213 mai 2014Oracle International CorporationSecure search performance improvement
US8812481 *12 juil. 200719 août 2014International Business Machines CorporationManagement of interesting database statistics
US88256297 sept. 20042 sept. 2014Oracle International CorporationMethod for index tuning of a SQL statement, and index merging for a multi-statement SQL workload, using a cost-based relational query optimizer
US886854028 févr. 200721 oct. 2014Oracle International CorporationMethod for suggesting web links and alternate terms for matching search queries
US887524928 févr. 200728 oct. 2014Oracle International CorporationMinimum lifespan credentials for crawling data repositories
US890380520 août 20102 déc. 2014Oracle International CorporationMethod and system for performing query optimization using a hybrid execution plan
US89839347 sept. 200417 mars 2015Oracle International CorporationSQL tuning base
US908181623 oct. 201314 juil. 2015Oracle International CorporationPropagating user identities in a secure federated search system
US917712428 févr. 20073 nov. 2015Oracle International CorporationFlexible authentication framework
US925136430 déc. 20132 févr. 2016Oracle International CorporationSearch hit URL modification for secure application integration
US946743729 oct. 201511 oct. 2016Oracle International CorporationFlexible authentication framework
US94794942 nov. 201525 oct. 2016Oracle International CorporationFlexible authentication framework
US9720941 *20 nov. 20141 août 2017Oracle International CorporationFully automated SQL tuning
US20050120000 *7 sept. 20042 juin 2005Oracle International CorporationAuto-tuning SQL statements
US20050177557 *7 sept. 200411 août 2005Oracle International CorporationAutomatic prevention of run-away query execution
US20050210461 *17 mars 200422 sept. 2005Oracle International CorporationMethod and mechanism for performing a rolling upgrade of distributed computer software
US20060080285 *13 oct. 200413 avr. 2006Sybase, Inc.Database System with Methodology for Parallel Schedule Generation in a Query Optimizer
US20070208713 *28 févr. 20076 sept. 2007Oracle International CorporationAuto Generation of Suggested Links in a Search System
US20070208714 *28 févr. 20076 sept. 2007Oracle International CorporationMethod for Suggesting Web Links and Alternate Terms for Matching Search Queries
US20070208734 *28 févr. 20076 sept. 2007Oracle International CorporationLink Analysis for Enterprise Environment
US20070208744 *28 févr. 20076 sept. 2007Oracle International CorporationFlexible Authentication Framework
US20070208745 *28 févr. 20076 sept. 2007Oracle International CorporationSelf-Service Sources for Secure Search
US20070208746 *28 févr. 20076 sept. 2007Oracle International CorporationSecure Search Performance Improvement
US20070208755 *28 févr. 20076 sept. 2007Oracle International CorporationSuggested Content with Attribute Parameterization
US20070209080 *28 févr. 20076 sept. 2007Oracle International CorporationSearch Hit URL Modification for Secure Application Integration
US20070214129 *28 févr. 200713 sept. 2007Oracle International CorporationFlexible Authorization Model for Secure Search
US20070220268 *28 févr. 200720 sept. 2007Oracle International CorporationPropagating User Identities In A Secure Federated Search System
US20070250486 *18 avr. 200725 oct. 2007Oracle International CorporationDocument date as a ranking factor for crawling
US20070283425 *28 févr. 20076 déc. 2007Oracle International CorporationMinimum Lifespan Credentials for Crawling Data Repositories
US20080196012 *29 nov. 200714 août 2008Panaya Ltd.System and methods for static analysis of large computer programs and for presenting the results of the analysis to a user of a computer program
US20090006356 *27 juin 20071 janv. 2009Oracle International CorporationChanging ranking algorithms based on customer settings
US20090006359 *28 juin 20071 janv. 2009Oracle International CorporationAutomatically finding acronyms and synonyms in a corpus
US20090018992 *12 juil. 200715 janv. 2009Ibm CorporationManagement of interesting database statistics
US20090037404 *31 juil. 20075 févr. 2009Oracle International CorporationExtended cursor sharing
US20090037405 *31 juil. 20075 févr. 2009Oracle International CorporationAdaptive cursor sharing
US20090248621 *31 mars 20081 oct. 2009Benoit DagevilleMethod and mechanism for out-of-the-box real-time sql monitoring
US20100185611 *31 mars 201022 juil. 2010Oracle International CorporationRe-ranking search results from an enterprise system
US20120072426 *19 août 201122 mars 2012Oracle International CorporationSelf-service sources for secure search
US20150039555 *2 août 20135 févr. 2015International Business Machines CorporationHeuristically modifying dbms environments using performance analytics
US20150081669 *20 nov. 201419 mars 2015Oracle International CorporationFully automated sql tuning
CN103164455A *15 déc. 201119 juin 2013百度在线网络技术(北京)有限公司Optimization method and optimization device of data base
CN104615696A *23 janv. 201513 mai 2015国家电网公司95598 knowledge base system and establishment method
Classifications
Classification aux États-Unis1/1, 707/999.003
Classification internationaleG06F17/30, G06F7/00, G06F17/00
Classification coopérativeY10S707/99934, Y10S707/99944, Y10S707/99932, G06F17/30474, G06F17/30306
Classification européenneG06F17/30S4P3T7, G06F17/30S1T
Événements juridiques
DateCodeÉvénementDescription
31 janv. 2005ASAssignment
Owner name: ORACLE INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION, CALIFORNIA
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:ZAIT, MOHAMED;DAGEVILLE, BENOIT;DAS, DINESH;AND OTHERS;REEL/FRAME:015639/0629;SIGNING DATES FROM 20041227 TO 20050110