US20050133411A1 - Process for reducing content of sulphur compounds and poly-aromatic hydrocarbons in a hydrocarbon feed - Google Patents

Process for reducing content of sulphur compounds and poly-aromatic hydrocarbons in a hydrocarbon feed Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US20050133411A1
US20050133411A1 US11/062,923 US6292305A US2005133411A1 US 20050133411 A1 US20050133411 A1 US 20050133411A1 US 6292305 A US6292305 A US 6292305A US 2005133411 A1 US2005133411 A1 US 2005133411A1
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
hydrotreating
reactor
fcc
catalyst
temperature
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Abandoned
Application number
US11/062,923
Inventor
Per Zeuthen
Barry Cooper
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Individual
Original Assignee
Individual
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Individual filed Critical Individual
Priority to US11/062,923 priority Critical patent/US20050133411A1/en
Publication of US20050133411A1 publication Critical patent/US20050133411A1/en
Abandoned legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C10PETROLEUM, GAS OR COKE INDUSTRIES; TECHNICAL GASES CONTAINING CARBON MONOXIDE; FUELS; LUBRICANTS; PEAT
    • C10GCRACKING HYDROCARBON OILS; PRODUCTION OF LIQUID HYDROCARBON MIXTURES, e.g. BY DESTRUCTIVE HYDROGENATION, OLIGOMERISATION, POLYMERISATION; RECOVERY OF HYDROCARBON OILS FROM OIL-SHALE, OIL-SAND, OR GASES; REFINING MIXTURES MAINLY CONSISTING OF HYDROCARBONS; REFORMING OF NAPHTHA; MINERAL WAXES
    • C10G65/00Treatment of hydrocarbon oils by two or more hydrotreatment processes only
    • C10G65/02Treatment of hydrocarbon oils by two or more hydrotreatment processes only plural serial stages only
    • C10G65/04Treatment of hydrocarbon oils by two or more hydrotreatment processes only plural serial stages only including only refining steps
    • C10G65/08Treatment of hydrocarbon oils by two or more hydrotreatment processes only plural serial stages only including only refining steps at least one step being a hydrogenation of the aromatic hydrocarbons
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C10PETROLEUM, GAS OR COKE INDUSTRIES; TECHNICAL GASES CONTAINING CARBON MONOXIDE; FUELS; LUBRICANTS; PEAT
    • C10GCRACKING HYDROCARBON OILS; PRODUCTION OF LIQUID HYDROCARBON MIXTURES, e.g. BY DESTRUCTIVE HYDROGENATION, OLIGOMERISATION, POLYMERISATION; RECOVERY OF HYDROCARBON OILS FROM OIL-SHALE, OIL-SAND, OR GASES; REFINING MIXTURES MAINLY CONSISTING OF HYDROCARBONS; REFORMING OF NAPHTHA; MINERAL WAXES
    • C10G65/00Treatment of hydrocarbon oils by two or more hydrotreatment processes only
    • C10G65/02Treatment of hydrocarbon oils by two or more hydrotreatment processes only plural serial stages only
    • C10G65/04Treatment of hydrocarbon oils by two or more hydrotreatment processes only plural serial stages only including only refining steps
    • C10G65/043Treatment of hydrocarbon oils by two or more hydrotreatment processes only plural serial stages only including only refining steps at least one step being a change in the structural skeleton

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to a process for removal of sulphur and polyaromatic compounds in vacuum gas oil by hydrotreatment of FCC hydrocarbon feed stock.
  • FCC fluid catalytic cracking
  • Treating the FCC products involves multiple process solutions: naphtha treating, light-cycle oil (LCO) treating and flue gas treating to control the SOX emissions.
  • Treating feed to the FCC unit can increase yields and at the same time lower sulphur levels in gasoline, and diesel fuels and reduces SOX emissions.
  • the increased conversion in the FCC unit resulting from feed treatment may improve refinery margins.
  • Product treatment offers no yield benefits.
  • a general object of the invention to improve production of a FCC feed being substantially reduced in content of sulphur and nitrogen compounds and in particular having a low content of polyaromatic hydrocarbons and thereby improved crackability and conversion and selectivity in the FCC unit.
  • Hydrotreatment of FCC feed substantially reduces sulphur content of gasoline, light (LCO), and decant oil. It also lowers the amount of sulphur in spent catalyst coke, which results in the reduction of SOX emissions from the regenerator.
  • LCO light
  • hydrotreating can be used to achieve a high level of desulphurization (>90%) and greatly reduce the sulphur content of the FCC products. High severity desulphurization would be needed to reduce coke sulphur to the near zero level.
  • Nitrogen compounds poison the active sites in the FCC catalyst and increase coke-making propensity of the catalyst and reduce the yield of valuable products. Nitrogen removal by hydrotreatment is much harder than sulphur removal. Moderate to high severity is generally required to achieve a high denitrogenation level (>70%).
  • PAH Poly-aromatic hydrocarbons
  • Di-aromatic species distribute in all liquid products from the FCC and also convert to coke on the FCC catalyst.
  • Tri-aromatic and tetra-aromatic species either convert to coke on the catalyst or distribute in the light cycle oil or heavier fraction from the FCC. Maximising FCC gasoline and lighter valuable products requires an understanding of how to maximise the conversion of multiple ring aromatic species (di+) to single (mono) aromatic or saturated ring species in the FCC feed hydrotreater.
  • the degree of aromatic saturation is highly dependent on hydrogen partial pressure, catalyst type and the space velocity of the hydrotreater.
  • the kinetic and thermodynamic responses of sulphur, nitrogen and other contaminant removal are such that an increase in temperature results in conversion of these contaminants.
  • the kinetic responses for these contaminants represent irreversible reactions.
  • Typical conditions for a FCC pre-treatment reactor are hydrogen pressure of 40-120 bar; average reactor temperature 350-410° C.; liquid hourly space velocity (LHSV) of 0.5-2.5 m 3 oil/m 3 catalyst/h.
  • LHSV liquid hourly space velocity
  • the end of the run is normally reached when the design temperature for the reactor is reached, which is decided by the metallurgy of the reactor.
  • the run length is a very important consideration.
  • a shorter run length means high costs due to a higher rate of catalyst replacement, and relative more downtime (i.e. time off-stream) for catalyst change-out with a resultant loss of revenue due to reduced production of high quality FCC gasoline products.
  • the aromatic saturation will pass through a maximum as the reaction temperature is increased.
  • the maximum is identified as the point, where the net rate of aromatic saturation is zero due to the effects of the forward and reverse reactions.
  • the temperature at which the PAH equilibrium is met will depend on a number of factors including hydrogen pressure, feed PAH content and composition and LHSV.
  • the general object of the invention to provide a process for the production of a low sulphur and nitrogen FCC feed with a low content of polyaromatic hydrocarbons and thereby increase the FCC yields and in particular the FCC gasoline production.
  • the present invention is a process for reducing content of sulphur compounds and poly-aromatic hydrocarbons in a hydrocarbon feed stock having a boiling range between 200° C. and 600° C., which process comprises the steps of:
  • the inventive process a low PAH content is achieved in FCC feeds with only slight additional investment in reactor volume and without reduction in run length.
  • the essences of the inventive process consists of cooling the effluent exiting the hydrotreating reactor and passing the cooled product through a small posttreat reactor containing a suitable catalyst.
  • the PAH content of the product existing in the hydrotreating reactor is reduced in the posttreatment reactor owing to the more favourable equilibrium conditions at the lower temperature. Consequently, the end of run temperature in the main hydrotreating reactor is not limited by the PAH content of the product exiting the main reactor, and a small overall reactor volume (main hydrotreater plus post treat reactor) is required for a given run length.
  • the final bed of the main hydrotreating reactor is operated at lower temperature instead of using a post treatment reactor.
  • the process can be used to lower the content of poly-aromatic hydrocarbons and thereby improve the performance of the FCC unit because of improved crackability of the FCC feed as well as the FCC product qualities.
  • the petroleum vacuum distillates used in the present invention boil in the range 400-650° C. and have a PAH content in the range 5-50 wt %.
  • Examples of petroleum fractions include straight run vacuum gas oils from a vacuum crude distillation and vacuum fractions of the product from fluid catalytic cracking and thermal cracking processes including cooking and mixtures thereof. The process is particularly suitable for blends of vacuum distillates containing thermal cracked oils and FCC products because these oils generally have a high PAH content.
  • Feedstock is mixed with hydrogen, heated in the furnace 1 and passed through the hydrotreating reactor 2 .
  • the effluent from the hydrotreater is cooled to a suitable temperature by heat exchange with the feed to hydrotreater 3 or by other means before passing to post-treatment reactor 4 .
  • the temperature employed in the post-treatment reactor will typically be in the range of 300° C. to 375° C., and will typically be at least 50° C. lower than the outlet temperature of the hydrotreater.
  • the LHSV in the posttreatment reactor will typically be in the range 2-20 m 3 oil/m 3 catalyst/h and the total pressure will be at the same level as that in the hydrotreating reactor.
  • the catalyst used in the hydrotreating reactor may be any catalyst used for hydrotreating petroleum fractions and known in the art.
  • the catalyst contains at least one metal on a porous refractory inorganic oxide support. Examples of metals having hydrotreating activity include metals from groups VI-B and VIII e.g. Co, Mo, Ni, W, Fe with mixtures of Co—Mo, Ni—Mo and Ni—W preferred.
  • the metals are employed as oxides or sulphides.
  • porous material suitable as support include alumina, silica-alumina, alumina-titania, natural and synthetic molecular sieves and mixtures hereof with the alumina and silica-alumina being preferred.
  • the catalyst used in the posttreatment reactor may be any catalyst used for hydrotreating vacuum distillate streams.
  • Preferred catalysts are Ni—Mo, Co—Mo and Ni—W on alumina.
  • the active metal on the catalyst may be either presulphided or in-situ sulphide prior to use by conventional means.
  • the hydrotreating reactor section may consist of one or more reactors. Each reactor may have one or more catalyst beds.
  • the function of the hydrotreating reactor is primarily to reduce product sulphur, nitrogen, CCR and metals. Owing to the exothermic nature of the desulphurisation reaction, the outlet temperature is generally higher than the inlet temperature. Some reduction of PAH may be achieved in the hydrotreating reactor especially at start of run conditions. As the catalyst activity declines due to the deactivation by carbonaceous deposits, sintering of the active phase and other mechanisms, the inlet temperature to the hydrotreating reactor is raised, resulting in an increased outlet temperature.
  • the function of the post-treatment reactor is primarily to reduce the PAH content, but also to lower the sulphur and nitrogen.
  • the reduction in PAH will result in a reduction in the product oil density and refractive index (RI) both of which are desirable. Also reduction in the sulphur and nitrogen content will be achieved at the conditions in the post-treatment reactor.
  • RI refractive index
  • Feedstock A (Table 1) was hydrotreated in a semi-adiabatic pilot plant unit running with an outlet temperature of 405° C.—a temperature, which normally is considered as end of run temperature (EOR) conditions and LHSV at 1 (hr ⁇ 1 ). The pressure was 50 bar. Pure hydrogen was used as gas. Feedstock A is a mixture of 50% cooker gas oil and 50% straight run vacuum gas oil (SR VGO). Feedstock B (Table 1) was hydrotreated at typical FCC pretreatment conditions in a pilot plant unit at temperature at 400° C. (inlet)-420° C. (outlet) temperature, which normally is considered as end of run conditions at LHSV at 1.7 (h ⁇ 1 ). The pressure was 50 bar. The feedstock was a pure cracked VGO.
  • Product A contains 14.5 wt % PAH, which would be typical for a product obtained at EOR conditions in a unit where the hydrogen partial inlet pressure is 50 bar, if the feedstock contains more cracked feedstock or DAO (De-Asphalt Oil) the contents will be higher.
  • DAO De-Asphalt Oil
  • Product B contains 35.2 wt % PAH, which is rather high, but typical for cracked feedstocks.
  • Product A from Example 1 is further hydrotreated at lower temperatures at high LHSV.
  • the pressure is 50 bar, which is identical to the pressure at which product A was obtained.
  • Example 2 Tem- Di- Tri- pera- N aro- aro- ture LHSV SG S (wt matics matics PAH (° C.) (h ⁇ 1 ) 60/60 (wt %) ppm) (wt %) (wt %) (wt %) 325 6 0.8914 0.0038 505 4.6 5.0 9.6 350 6 0.8911 0.0029 468 4.9 4.9 9.5

Abstract

A process for reducing content of sulphur compounds and polyaromatic hydrocarbons in a hydrocarbon feed having a boiling range between 200° C. and 600° C. is disclosed. The process comprises in combination contacting the feed and hydrogen over a hydrotreating catalyst and hydrotreating feed at hydrotreating conditions, cooling the hydrotreated effluent and hydrogen-rich gas from the hydrotreating reactor and contacting the effluent and hydrogen gas over a hydrotreating catalyst in a post-pretreatment reactor at a temperature sufficient to lower the polyaromatic hydrocarbon content.

Description

    BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
  • The present invention relates to a process for removal of sulphur and polyaromatic compounds in vacuum gas oil by hydrotreatment of FCC hydrocarbon feed stock.
  • Many countries are tightening specifications for the sulphur content in diesel and gasoline fuels. The fluid catalytic cracking (FCC) units are a major source of gasoline, but also the major source of sulphur in gasoline and diesel fuels. Lower sulphur content in fuel requests either treating the FCC feed or treating its products.
  • Treating the FCC products involves multiple process solutions: naphtha treating, light-cycle oil (LCO) treating and flue gas treating to control the SOX emissions. Treating feed to the FCC unit can increase yields and at the same time lower sulphur levels in gasoline, and diesel fuels and reduces SOX emissions. The increased conversion in the FCC unit resulting from feed treatment may improve refinery margins. Product treatment, however, offers no yield benefits.
  • It is, thus, a general object of the invention to improve production of a FCC feed being substantially reduced in content of sulphur and nitrogen compounds and in particular having a low content of polyaromatic hydrocarbons and thereby improved crackability and conversion and selectivity in the FCC unit.
  • DESCRIPTION OF PRIOR ART
  • Hydrotreatment of FCC feed substantially reduces sulphur content of gasoline, light (LCO), and decant oil. It also lowers the amount of sulphur in spent catalyst coke, which results in the reduction of SOX emissions from the regenerator. For most feedstocks moderate to high severity hydrotreating can be used to achieve a high level of desulphurization (>90%) and greatly reduce the sulphur content of the FCC products. High severity desulphurization would be needed to reduce coke sulphur to the near zero level.
  • It is well known that removal of nitrogen from FCC feed yields the benefits of increasing conversion and product yields. Nitrogen compounds poison the active sites in the FCC catalyst and increase coke-making propensity of the catalyst and reduce the yield of valuable products. Nitrogen removal by hydrotreatment is much harder than sulphur removal. Moderate to high severity is generally required to achieve a high denitrogenation level (>70%).
  • Poly-aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH) do not crack in a FCC unit, but instead undergo condensation reactions to form coke. PAH are defined as fused multiring aromatic compounds containing two or more aromatic rings. The concentration of PAH can be measured by the analysis method IP 391. Hydrotreating can saturate PAH and form naphthenes and paraffin compounds, which are more easily cracked in the FCC.
  • This improves conversion and product yields. Mono-aromatics another product of PAH hydrogenation resist cracking in a FCC unit, but lose side chains and produce high-octane components in the FCC gasoline.
  • Di-aromatic species distribute in all liquid products from the FCC and also convert to coke on the FCC catalyst. Tri-aromatic and tetra-aromatic species either convert to coke on the catalyst or distribute in the light cycle oil or heavier fraction from the FCC. Maximising FCC gasoline and lighter valuable products requires an understanding of how to maximise the conversion of multiple ring aromatic species (di+) to single (mono) aromatic or saturated ring species in the FCC feed hydrotreater.
  • The degree of aromatic saturation is highly dependent on hydrogen partial pressure, catalyst type and the space velocity of the hydrotreater. The kinetic and thermodynamic responses of sulphur, nitrogen and other contaminant removal are such that an increase in temperature results in conversion of these contaminants. The kinetic responses for these contaminants represent irreversible reactions.
  • Typical conditions for a FCC pre-treatment reactor are hydrogen pressure of 40-120 bar; average reactor temperature 350-410° C.; liquid hourly space velocity (LHSV) of 0.5-2.5 m3 oil/m3 catalyst/h. The exact conditions will depend on the type of the feedstock, the required degree of desulphurisation and the desired run length. The reactor temperature on fresh catalyst (start of run) is normally at the lower end of the above range and as the catalyst deactivates the reactor temperature is raised to compensate for loss of catalyst activity.
  • The end of the run is normally reached when the design temperature for the reactor is reached, which is decided by the metallurgy of the reactor. The lower the start of run temperature and the higher the end of run temperature the longer the catalyst run length for a given rate of deactivation. For a refiner, the run length is a very important consideration. A shorter run length means high costs due to a higher rate of catalyst replacement, and relative more downtime (i.e. time off-stream) for catalyst change-out with a resultant loss of revenue due to reduced production of high quality FCC gasoline products.
  • Further restriction on run length may be imposed, if the FCC unit operations need a reduction in poly-aromatic hydrocarbon content in addition to the reduction in sulphur and nitrogen. PAH compounds reacts readily at hydrotreating conditions. Tetra-aromatic and tree-ring aromatic compounds are hydrogenated to mono-aromatic compounds. The mono-aromatic compounds react slowly at typical FCC pre-treatment conditions to form naphthenes.
  • The reactions are reversible and at high reaction temperatures and low hydrogen pressure the conversion of the PAH compounds is thermodynamically limited by equilibrium. Consequently, the conversion of PAH compounds in a FCC pretreatment unit producing low sulphur and nitrogen feed to the FCC unit might at first increase as reaction temperature is increased, and then decrease as temperature is increased further owing to equilibrium constraints at the high temperature.
  • The aromatic saturation will pass through a maximum as the reaction temperature is increased. The maximum is identified as the point, where the net rate of aromatic saturation is zero due to the effects of the forward and reverse reactions.
  • The temperature at which the PAH equilibrium is met will depend on a number of factors including hydrogen pressure, feed PAH content and composition and LHSV.
  • It is, thus, the general object of the invention to provide a process for the production of a low sulphur and nitrogen FCC feed with a low content of polyaromatic hydrocarbons and thereby increase the FCC yields and in particular the FCC gasoline production.
  • SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
  • The present invention is a process for reducing content of sulphur compounds and poly-aromatic hydrocarbons in a hydrocarbon feed stock having a boiling range between 200° C. and 600° C., which process comprises the steps of:
    • (a) contacting the feed stock with hydrogen over a hydrotreating catalyst at conditions being effective in hydrotreating and obtaining a hydrotreated effluent with the hydrotreated feed stock, hydrogen sulphide and hydrogen;
    • (b) cooling the effluent; and
    • (c) contacting the effluent with a hydrotreating catalyst at conditions being effective in hydrogenation of polyaromatic hydrocarbons.
  • By the inventive process, a low PAH content is achieved in FCC feeds with only slight additional investment in reactor volume and without reduction in run length. The essences of the inventive process consists of cooling the effluent exiting the hydrotreating reactor and passing the cooled product through a small posttreat reactor containing a suitable catalyst. The PAH content of the product existing in the hydrotreating reactor is reduced in the posttreatment reactor owing to the more favourable equilibrium conditions at the lower temperature. Consequently, the end of run temperature in the main hydrotreating reactor is not limited by the PAH content of the product exiting the main reactor, and a small overall reactor volume (main hydrotreater plus post treat reactor) is required for a given run length. In another embodiment of the process, the final bed of the main hydrotreating reactor is operated at lower temperature instead of using a post treatment reactor. The process can be used to lower the content of poly-aromatic hydrocarbons and thereby improve the performance of the FCC unit because of improved crackability of the FCC feed as well as the FCC product qualities.
  • DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
  • The petroleum vacuum distillates used in the present invention boil in the range 400-650° C. and have a PAH content in the range 5-50 wt %. Examples of petroleum fractions include straight run vacuum gas oils from a vacuum crude distillation and vacuum fractions of the product from fluid catalytic cracking and thermal cracking processes including cooking and mixtures thereof. The process is particularly suitable for blends of vacuum distillates containing thermal cracked oils and FCC products because these oils generally have a high PAH content.
  • The process layout is illustrated in FIG. 1. Feedstock is mixed with hydrogen, heated in the furnace 1 and passed through the hydrotreating reactor 2. The conditions used in the hydrotreating reactor are the same as those normally used for hydrotreatment of FCC feeds, i.e. typical hydrogen pressure=40-120 bar; typical average reactor temperature=340-410° C.; typical LHSV=0.5-2.0 m3 oil/m3 catalyst/h and typical hydrogen gas to oil ratio=100-1000 Nm3/m3.
  • The effluent from the hydrotreater is cooled to a suitable temperature by heat exchange with the feed to hydrotreater 3 or by other means before passing to post-treatment reactor 4. The temperature employed in the post-treatment reactor will typically be in the range of 300° C. to 375° C., and will typically be at least 50° C. lower than the outlet temperature of the hydrotreater. The LHSV in the posttreatment reactor will typically be in the range 2-20 m3 oil/m3 catalyst/h and the total pressure will be at the same level as that in the hydrotreating reactor. The catalyst used in the hydrotreating reactor may be any catalyst used for hydrotreating petroleum fractions and known in the art. The catalyst contains at least one metal on a porous refractory inorganic oxide support. Examples of metals having hydrotreating activity include metals from groups VI-B and VIII e.g. Co, Mo, Ni, W, Fe with mixtures of Co—Mo, Ni—Mo and Ni—W preferred.
  • The metals are employed as oxides or sulphides. Examples of porous material suitable as support include alumina, silica-alumina, alumina-titania, natural and synthetic molecular sieves and mixtures hereof with the alumina and silica-alumina being preferred.
  • The catalyst used in the posttreatment reactor may be any catalyst used for hydrotreating vacuum distillate streams. Preferred catalysts are Ni—Mo, Co—Mo and Ni—W on alumina. The active metal on the catalyst may be either presulphided or in-situ sulphide prior to use by conventional means. The hydrotreating reactor section may consist of one or more reactors. Each reactor may have one or more catalyst beds.
  • The function of the hydrotreating reactor is primarily to reduce product sulphur, nitrogen, CCR and metals. Owing to the exothermic nature of the desulphurisation reaction, the outlet temperature is generally higher than the inlet temperature. Some reduction of PAH may be achieved in the hydrotreating reactor especially at start of run conditions. As the catalyst activity declines due to the deactivation by carbonaceous deposits, sintering of the active phase and other mechanisms, the inlet temperature to the hydrotreating reactor is raised, resulting in an increased outlet temperature.
  • This will result at some point in an increase in the PAH content in the effluent of the hydrotreater reactor due to equilibrium limitations. The temperature at which this occurs will depend on the amount and type of aromatic compounds in the oil, and the hydrogen partial pressure in the unit.
  • The function of the post-treatment reactor is primarily to reduce the PAH content, but also to lower the sulphur and nitrogen. The reduction in PAH will result in a reduction in the product oil density and refractive index (RI) both of which are desirable. Also reduction in the sulphur and nitrogen content will be achieved at the conditions in the post-treatment reactor. The present invention is illustrated in the following examples of specific embodiments.
  • EXAMPLE 1
  • Feedstock A (Table 1) was hydrotreated in a semi-adiabatic pilot plant unit running with an outlet temperature of 405° C.—a temperature, which normally is considered as end of run temperature (EOR) conditions and LHSV at 1 (hr−1). The pressure was 50 bar. Pure hydrogen was used as gas. Feedstock A is a mixture of 50% cooker gas oil and 50% straight run vacuum gas oil (SR VGO). Feedstock B (Table 1) was hydrotreated at typical FCC pretreatment conditions in a pilot plant unit at temperature at 400° C. (inlet)-420° C. (outlet) temperature, which normally is considered as end of run conditions at LHSV at 1.7 (h−1). The pressure was 50 bar. The feedstock was a pure cracked VGO.
    TABLE 1
    Properties of feedstock used in the following Examples:
    Properties Feedstock A Feedstock B
    SG 60/60 0.9279 0.9924
    S (wt %) 1.34 3.53
    N (wt ppm) 2677 3594
    Aromatics (wt %)
    Mono- 17.7 8.36
    Di- 9.9 7.29
    Tri- 11.4 36.5
  • Product properties from both of the tests are shown in Table 2.
    TABLE 2
    Properties of products in Example 1:
    Properties Product A Product B
    SG 60/60 0.8920 0.9411
    S (wt %) 0.02 0.1905
    N (wt ppm) 526 2046
    Aromatics (wt %)
    Mono- 31.0 22.6
    Di- 7.8 11.3
    Tri- 6.7 23.9
    Distillation,
    D2887 (° C.)
     5 236 287
    10 267 314
    30 342 360
    50 392 392
    70 437 428
    90 495 479
    95 518 503
  • Product A contains 14.5 wt % PAH, which would be typical for a product obtained at EOR conditions in a unit where the hydrogen partial inlet pressure is 50 bar, if the feedstock contains more cracked feedstock or DAO (De-Asphalt Oil) the contents will be higher.
  • Product B contains 35.2 wt % PAH, which is rather high, but typical for cracked feedstocks.
  • EXAMPLE 2
  • Product A from Example 1 is further hydrotreated at lower temperatures at high LHSV. The pressure is 50 bar, which is identical to the pressure at which product A was obtained.
  • A Ni—Mo on alumina catalyst is used in this test. The results are shown in Table 3.
    TABLE 3
    Properties of products in Example 2:
    Tem- Di- Tri-
    pera- N aro- aro-
    ture LHSV SG S (wt matics matics PAH
    (° C.) (h−1) 60/60 (wt %) ppm) (wt %) (wt %) (wt %)
    325 6 0.8914 0.0038 505 4.6 5.0 9.6
    350 6 0.8911 0.0029 468 4.9 4.9 9.5
  • As illustrated from the Table 3 there are a remarkable sulphur and nitrogen removal in this low temperature hydrotreatment, and further it is quite obvious that a large amount of the PAH can be removed at a relatively high LHSV during this low temperature posttreatment. Both the sulphur removal and the PAH removal is due to the shift in equilibrium.
  • EXAMPLE 3
  • Product B from Example 1 is further hydrotreated at lower temperatures at different LHSV and temperatures. The pressure is 50 bar, which is identical to the pressure at which product B was obtained. A Ni—Mo on alumina catalyst is also used in this test. The results are shown in Table 4.
    TABLE 4
    Properties of products in Example 3:
    Tem- Di- Tri-
    pera- N aro- aro-
    ture LHSV SG S (wt matics matics PAH
    (° C.) (h−1) 60/60 (wt %) ppm) (wt %) (wt %) (wt %)
    300 2 0.9369 0.1500 2058 7.7 20.1 27.8
    300 4 0.9390 0.1588 2067 10.2 21.3 31.5
    300 6 0.9406 0.1618 2080 9.9 21.4 31.6
    350 2 0.9335 0.1049 1657 6.6 17.0 23.6
    350 4 0.9365 0.1317 1870 9.2 18.1 27.3
    350 6 0.9378 0.1442 1877 9.6 19.3 28.9
  • Again it is clear that a large amount of the poly-aromatic compounds can be removed at low temperature (and the same pressure) due to the shift in equilibrium. Again there is a significant and important sulphur removal at this low-temperature hydrotreatment.

Claims (2)

1. A process for reducing content of sulphur compounds and polyaromatic hydrocarbons in a hydrocarbon feed stock having a boiling range between 200° C. and 600° C., which process comprises the steps of
(a) contacting the feed stock with hydrogen over a hydrotreating catalyst at conditions being effective in hydrotreating and obtaining an hydrotreated effluent with the hydrotreated feed stock, hydrogen sulphide and hydrogen,
(b) cooling the effluent, and
(c) contacting the effluent with a hydrotreating catalyst at conditions being effective in hydrogenation of polyaromatic hydrocarbons.
2-8. (canceled)
US11/062,923 2000-01-25 2005-02-23 Process for reducing content of sulphur compounds and poly-aromatic hydrocarbons in a hydrocarbon feed Abandoned US20050133411A1 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US11/062,923 US20050133411A1 (en) 2000-01-25 2005-02-23 Process for reducing content of sulphur compounds and poly-aromatic hydrocarbons in a hydrocarbon feed

Applications Claiming Priority (4)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
DKPA200000118 2000-01-25
DKPA200000118 2000-01-25
US09/768,733 US20010013484A1 (en) 2000-01-25 2001-01-24 Process for reducing content of sulphur compounds and poly-aromatic hydrocarbons in a hydrocarbon feed
US11/062,923 US20050133411A1 (en) 2000-01-25 2005-02-23 Process for reducing content of sulphur compounds and poly-aromatic hydrocarbons in a hydrocarbon feed

Related Parent Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US09/768,733 Continuation US20010013484A1 (en) 2000-01-25 2001-01-24 Process for reducing content of sulphur compounds and poly-aromatic hydrocarbons in a hydrocarbon feed

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US20050133411A1 true US20050133411A1 (en) 2005-06-23

Family

ID=8159003

Family Applications (3)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US09/768,733 Abandoned US20010013484A1 (en) 2000-01-25 2001-01-24 Process for reducing content of sulphur compounds and poly-aromatic hydrocarbons in a hydrocarbon feed
US09/768,954 Abandoned US20020117425A1 (en) 2000-01-25 2001-01-24 Process for reduction of content of sulphur compounds and polyaromatic hydrocarbons in distillate fuels
US11/062,923 Abandoned US20050133411A1 (en) 2000-01-25 2005-02-23 Process for reducing content of sulphur compounds and poly-aromatic hydrocarbons in a hydrocarbon feed

Family Applications Before (2)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US09/768,733 Abandoned US20010013484A1 (en) 2000-01-25 2001-01-24 Process for reducing content of sulphur compounds and poly-aromatic hydrocarbons in a hydrocarbon feed
US09/768,954 Abandoned US20020117425A1 (en) 2000-01-25 2001-01-24 Process for reduction of content of sulphur compounds and polyaromatic hydrocarbons in distillate fuels

Country Status (8)

Country Link
US (3) US20010013484A1 (en)
EP (2) EP1120454A3 (en)
JP (2) JP2001207177A (en)
CN (2) CN1224674C (en)
CA (2) CA2332157A1 (en)
NO (2) NO20010418L (en)
RU (1) RU2250917C2 (en)
ZA (2) ZA200100725B (en)

Cited By (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP2351820A2 (en) * 2008-10-17 2011-08-03 Sk Innovation Co., Ltd. Method for producing high value aromatics and olefin from light cycle oil produced by a fluidized catalytic cracking process
US10233399B2 (en) 2011-07-29 2019-03-19 Saudi Arabian Oil Company Selective middle distillate hydrotreating process
US10533141B2 (en) 2017-02-12 2020-01-14 Mag{tilde over (e)}mã Technology LLC Process and device for treating high sulfur heavy marine fuel oil for use as feedstock in a subsequent refinery unit
US10604709B2 (en) 2017-02-12 2020-03-31 Magēmā Technology LLC Multi-stage device and process for production of a low sulfur heavy marine fuel oil from distressed heavy fuel oil materials
US11788017B2 (en) 2017-02-12 2023-10-17 Magëmã Technology LLC Multi-stage process and device for reducing environmental contaminants in heavy marine fuel oil

Families Citing this family (16)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US7776205B2 (en) * 2004-04-22 2010-08-17 Exxonmobil Research And Engineering Company Process to upgrade hydrocarbonaceous feedstreams
US7780845B2 (en) * 2004-04-22 2010-08-24 Exxonmobil Research And Engineering Company Process to manufacture low sulfur distillates
CN102229816A (en) * 2005-01-14 2011-11-02 埃克森美孚化学专利公司 Ultra pure fluids
EP1925654A1 (en) * 2006-11-22 2008-05-28 Haldor Topsoe A/S Process for the catalytic hydrotreating of silicon containing hydrocarbon feedstock
FR2917423B1 (en) * 2007-06-12 2012-11-30 Inst Francais Du Petrole TWO STEP HYDROPROCESSING OF A RENEWABLE SOURCE LOAD USING A FIRST METAL CATALYST AND A SECOND SULFIDE CATALYST
CN101250435B (en) * 2008-03-31 2011-07-20 中国石油化工集团公司 Hydrocarbons hydrogenation conversion method
EP2199371A1 (en) 2008-12-15 2010-06-23 Total Raffinage Marketing Process for aromatic hydrogenation and cetane value increase of middle distillate feedstocks
IT1396948B1 (en) 2009-12-16 2012-12-20 Italghisa S P A ELECTRODIC PASTE FOR GRAPHITE ELECTRODES WITHOUT "BINDER" WITH HYDROCARBURIC BASIS
JP5535845B2 (en) 2010-09-14 2014-07-02 Jx日鉱日石エネルギー株式会社 Process for producing aromatic hydrocarbons
CN102757819B (en) * 2011-04-29 2015-02-25 中国石油化工股份有限公司 Method of using catalytic cracking heavy oil to produce high-octane gasoline
JP6161608B2 (en) * 2011-07-29 2017-07-12 サウジ アラビアン オイル カンパニー Integrated selective hydrocracking and fluid catalytic cracking process
US8911514B2 (en) * 2011-12-15 2014-12-16 Uop Llc Hydrotreating methods and hydrotreating systems
US10273420B2 (en) 2014-10-27 2019-04-30 Uop Llc Process for hydrotreating a hydrocarbons stream
CN109153925A (en) * 2016-05-17 2019-01-04 埃克森美孚研究工程公司 Aviation kerosine and diesel oil selective hydrogenation cracking
CN106221785B (en) * 2016-09-30 2017-12-19 中国石油大学(华东) A kind of method using viscous crude primary metal porphyrin catalysis polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon hydrogenation
TW201906992A (en) * 2017-07-04 2019-02-16 日商三菱化學股份有限公司 Method for producing aromatic hydrocarbon

Citations (17)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US2671754A (en) * 1951-07-21 1954-03-09 Universal Oil Prod Co Hydrocarbon conversion process providing for the two-stage hydrogenation of sulfur containing oils
US3347779A (en) * 1964-04-28 1967-10-17 Shell Oil Co Manufacture of petroleum distillates by hydrodesulfurization and hydrogenation
US3491019A (en) * 1968-08-30 1970-01-20 Universal Oil Prod Co Hydrotreating of light cycle oils
US3691060A (en) * 1970-02-19 1972-09-12 Texas V Inwood Hydrogenation of aromatic hydrocarbons
US3728249A (en) * 1971-02-05 1973-04-17 Exxon Research Engineering Co Selective hydrotreating of different hydrocarbonaceous feedstocks in temperature regulated hydrotreating zones
US3899543A (en) * 1972-09-01 1975-08-12 Inst Francais Du Petrole Process for hydrogenating aromatic compounds containing sulfur impurities
US3915841A (en) * 1974-04-12 1975-10-28 Gulf Research Development Co Process for hydrodesulfurizing and hydrotreating lubricating oils from sulfur-containing stock
US4019976A (en) * 1974-04-24 1977-04-26 Institut Francais Du Petrole Process for hydrogenating highly unsaturated heavy hydrocarbon cuts
US4021330A (en) * 1975-09-08 1977-05-03 Continental Oil Company Hydrotreating a high sulfur, aromatic liquid hydrocarbon
US4040944A (en) * 1968-04-11 1977-08-09 Union Oil Company Of California Manufacture of catalytic cracking charge stocks by hydrocracking
US4849093A (en) * 1987-02-02 1989-07-18 Union Oil Company Of California Catalytic aromatic saturation of hydrocarbons
US5114562A (en) * 1990-08-03 1992-05-19 Uop Two-stage hydrodesulfurization and hydrogenation process for distillate hydrocarbons
US5147526A (en) * 1991-10-01 1992-09-15 Amoco Corporation Distillate hydrogenation
US5419830A (en) * 1985-07-26 1995-05-30 Mobil Oil Corporation Method for controlling hydrocracking and isomerization dewaxing
US5741414A (en) * 1994-09-02 1998-04-21 Nippon Oil Co., Ltd. Method of manufacturing gas oil containing low amounts of sulfur and aromatic compounds
US6042716A (en) * 1996-12-20 2000-03-28 Institut Francais Du Petrole Process for transforming a gas oil cut to produce a dearomatised and desulphurised fuel with a high cetane number
US6264827B1 (en) * 1998-08-31 2001-07-24 Nippon Mitsubishi Oil Corp. Manufacturing process of diesel gas oil with high cetane number and low sulfur

Family Cites Families (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
DE938613C (en) * 1952-09-26 1956-02-02 Bayer Ag Process for the preparation of hydrocarbon mixtures suitable for sulfochlorination
GB824635A (en) * 1958-07-08 1959-12-02 Exxon Research Engineering Co Process for improving kerosenes and diesel fuels
GB940290A (en) * 1961-04-28 1963-10-30 Universal Oil Prod Co Process for the hydrorefining of aromatic hydrocarbon distillates
FR1359910A (en) * 1963-03-22 1964-04-30 Charbonnages De France Cyclanic hydrocarbons and their production process
DE2935191A1 (en) * 1979-08-31 1981-04-02 Metallgesellschaft Ag, 6000 Frankfurt Obtaining diesel oil esp. from coal-processing prods. - by two=stage catalytic hydrogenation
CA2025466A1 (en) * 1989-09-28 1991-03-29 Exxon Research And Engineering Company Slurry hydroprocessing staged process

Patent Citations (18)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US2671754A (en) * 1951-07-21 1954-03-09 Universal Oil Prod Co Hydrocarbon conversion process providing for the two-stage hydrogenation of sulfur containing oils
US3347779A (en) * 1964-04-28 1967-10-17 Shell Oil Co Manufacture of petroleum distillates by hydrodesulfurization and hydrogenation
US4040944A (en) * 1968-04-11 1977-08-09 Union Oil Company Of California Manufacture of catalytic cracking charge stocks by hydrocracking
US3491019A (en) * 1968-08-30 1970-01-20 Universal Oil Prod Co Hydrotreating of light cycle oils
US3691060A (en) * 1970-02-19 1972-09-12 Texas V Inwood Hydrogenation of aromatic hydrocarbons
US3728249A (en) * 1971-02-05 1973-04-17 Exxon Research Engineering Co Selective hydrotreating of different hydrocarbonaceous feedstocks in temperature regulated hydrotreating zones
US3899543A (en) * 1972-09-01 1975-08-12 Inst Francais Du Petrole Process for hydrogenating aromatic compounds containing sulfur impurities
US3915841A (en) * 1974-04-12 1975-10-28 Gulf Research Development Co Process for hydrodesulfurizing and hydrotreating lubricating oils from sulfur-containing stock
US4019976A (en) * 1974-04-24 1977-04-26 Institut Francais Du Petrole Process for hydrogenating highly unsaturated heavy hydrocarbon cuts
US4021330A (en) * 1975-09-08 1977-05-03 Continental Oil Company Hydrotreating a high sulfur, aromatic liquid hydrocarbon
US5419830A (en) * 1985-07-26 1995-05-30 Mobil Oil Corporation Method for controlling hydrocracking and isomerization dewaxing
US4849093A (en) * 1987-02-02 1989-07-18 Union Oil Company Of California Catalytic aromatic saturation of hydrocarbons
US5114562A (en) * 1990-08-03 1992-05-19 Uop Two-stage hydrodesulfurization and hydrogenation process for distillate hydrocarbons
US5147526A (en) * 1991-10-01 1992-09-15 Amoco Corporation Distillate hydrogenation
US5741414A (en) * 1994-09-02 1998-04-21 Nippon Oil Co., Ltd. Method of manufacturing gas oil containing low amounts of sulfur and aromatic compounds
US6042716A (en) * 1996-12-20 2000-03-28 Institut Francais Du Petrole Process for transforming a gas oil cut to produce a dearomatised and desulphurised fuel with a high cetane number
US6221239B1 (en) * 1996-12-20 2001-04-24 Institut Francais Du Petrole Process for transforming a gas oil cut to produce a dearomatised and desulphurised fuel with a high cetane number
US6264827B1 (en) * 1998-08-31 2001-07-24 Nippon Mitsubishi Oil Corp. Manufacturing process of diesel gas oil with high cetane number and low sulfur

Cited By (22)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP2351820A2 (en) * 2008-10-17 2011-08-03 Sk Innovation Co., Ltd. Method for producing high value aromatics and olefin from light cycle oil produced by a fluidized catalytic cracking process
EP2351820A4 (en) * 2008-10-17 2012-04-18 Sk Innovation Co Ltd Method for producing high value aromatics and olefin from light cycle oil produced by a fluidized catalytic cracking process
US10233399B2 (en) 2011-07-29 2019-03-19 Saudi Arabian Oil Company Selective middle distillate hydrotreating process
US10533141B2 (en) 2017-02-12 2020-01-14 Mag{tilde over (e)}mã Technology LLC Process and device for treating high sulfur heavy marine fuel oil for use as feedstock in a subsequent refinery unit
US10563133B2 (en) 2017-02-12 2020-02-18 Magëmä Technology LLC Multi-stage device and process for production of a low sulfur heavy marine fuel oil
US10563132B2 (en) 2017-02-12 2020-02-18 Magēmā Technology, LLC Multi-stage process and device for treatment heavy marine fuel oil and resultant composition including ultrasound promoted desulfurization
US10584287B2 (en) 2017-02-12 2020-03-10 Magēmā Technology LLC Heavy marine fuel oil composition
US10604709B2 (en) 2017-02-12 2020-03-31 Magēmā Technology LLC Multi-stage device and process for production of a low sulfur heavy marine fuel oil from distressed heavy fuel oil materials
US10655074B2 (en) 2017-02-12 2020-05-19 Mag{hacek over (e)}m{hacek over (a)} Technology LLC Multi-stage process and device for reducing environmental contaminates in heavy marine fuel oil
US10836966B2 (en) 2017-02-12 2020-11-17 Magēmā Technology LLC Multi-stage process and device utilizing structured catalyst beds and reactive distillation for the production of a low sulfur heavy marine fuel oil
US11136513B2 (en) 2017-02-12 2021-10-05 Magëmä Technology LLC Multi-stage device and process for production of a low sulfur heavy marine fuel oil from distressed heavy fuel oil materials
US11203722B2 (en) 2017-02-12 2021-12-21 Magëmä Technology LLC Multi-stage process and device for treatment heavy marine fuel oil and resultant composition including ultrasound promoted desulfurization
US11345863B2 (en) 2017-02-12 2022-05-31 Magema Technology, Llc Heavy marine fuel oil composition
US11441084B2 (en) 2017-02-12 2022-09-13 Magēmā Technology LLC Multi-stage device and process for production of a low sulfur heavy marine fuel oil
US11447706B2 (en) 2017-02-12 2022-09-20 Magēmā Technology LLC Heavy marine fuel compositions
US11492559B2 (en) 2017-02-12 2022-11-08 Magema Technology, Llc Process and device for reducing environmental contaminates in heavy marine fuel oil
US11530360B2 (en) 2017-02-12 2022-12-20 Magēmā Technology LLC Process and device for treating high sulfur heavy marine fuel oil for use as feedstock in a subsequent refinery unit
US11560520B2 (en) 2017-02-12 2023-01-24 Magēmā Technology LLC Multi-stage process and device for treatment heavy marine fuel oil and resultant composition and the removal of detrimental solids
US11788017B2 (en) 2017-02-12 2023-10-17 Magëmã Technology LLC Multi-stage process and device for reducing environmental contaminants in heavy marine fuel oil
US11795406B2 (en) 2017-02-12 2023-10-24 Magemä Technology LLC Multi-stage device and process for production of a low sulfur heavy marine fuel oil from distressed heavy fuel oil materials
US11884883B2 (en) 2017-02-12 2024-01-30 MagêmãTechnology LLC Multi-stage device and process for production of a low sulfur heavy marine fuel oil
US11912945B2 (en) 2017-02-12 2024-02-27 Magēmā Technology LLC Process and device for treating high sulfur heavy marine fuel oil for use as feedstock in a subsequent refinery unit

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
CN1224674C (en) 2005-10-26
CN1311289A (en) 2001-09-05
CA2332157A1 (en) 2001-07-25
CA2332262A1 (en) 2001-07-25
ZA200100725B (en) 2001-11-06
US20020117425A1 (en) 2002-08-29
JP2001207178A (en) 2001-07-31
RU2250917C2 (en) 2005-04-27
JP2001207177A (en) 2001-07-31
EP1120453A2 (en) 2001-08-01
EP1120453A3 (en) 2002-01-30
NO20010418L (en) 2001-07-26
CN1309163A (en) 2001-08-22
NO20010419L (en) 2001-07-26
ZA200100724B (en) 2001-11-06
NO20010418D0 (en) 2001-01-24
EP1120454A3 (en) 2002-01-30
US20010013484A1 (en) 2001-08-16
NO20010419D0 (en) 2001-01-24
EP1120454A2 (en) 2001-08-01

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US20050133411A1 (en) Process for reducing content of sulphur compounds and poly-aromatic hydrocarbons in a hydrocarbon feed
EP0944693B1 (en) Process for increased olefin yields from heavy feedstocks
US7507328B2 (en) Selective hydrodesulfurization and mercaptan decomposition process with interstage separation
CA2414441C (en) Process for the production of high quality middle distillates from mild hydrocrackers and vacuum gas oil hydrotreaters in combination with external feeds in the middle distillate boiling range
US6623623B2 (en) Simultaneous hydroprocessing of two feedstocks
CA2630340C (en) Selective naphtha hydrodesulfurization with high temperature mercaptan decomposition
AU2001249836B2 (en) Staged hydrotreating method for naphtha desulfurization
EP0093552A2 (en) Hydrocracking process
AU2003241412B2 (en) Multi-stage hydrodesulfurization of cracked naphtha streams with a stacked bed reactor
US6824673B1 (en) Production of low sulfur/low aromatics distillates
US20040238409A1 (en) Hydrogenation of middle distillate using a counter-current reactor
US3308055A (en) Hydrocracking process producing lubricating oil
KR100980324B1 (en) A process for reducing sulfur and olefin contents in gasoline
JPS61296089A (en) Hydrocracking method using zeolite beta
CA2423946A1 (en) Hydrocracking process
CA2491012C (en) An improved hydrocracking process
AU2001251658B2 (en) Production of low sulfur/low aromatics distillates
AU2001251658A1 (en) Production of low sulfur/low aromatics distillates
Zamfirache et al. Environmentally friendly diesel fuels produced from middle distillates generated by conversion processes
Zamfirache et al. Research Institute for Petroleum Processing and Petrochemistry, B-dul Republicii mr. 291 A, 2000 Ploieşti, Romania
JPH0241391A (en) Method of hydrocracking of stock oil

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
STCB Information on status: application discontinuation

Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION