US20050208856A1 - Flame resistant fabrics with improved aesthetics and comfort, and method of making same - Google Patents

Flame resistant fabrics with improved aesthetics and comfort, and method of making same Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US20050208856A1
US20050208856A1 US11/123,354 US12335405A US2005208856A1 US 20050208856 A1 US20050208856 A1 US 20050208856A1 US 12335405 A US12335405 A US 12335405A US 2005208856 A1 US2005208856 A1 US 2005208856A1
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
fabric
washes
flame resistant
fibers
woven
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Abandoned
Application number
US11/123,354
Inventor
Paul McKee
Joseph Glenn
Mathias Richardson
Nathan Emery
Roy Demott
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Milliken and Co
Original Assignee
Milliken and Co
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Milliken and Co filed Critical Milliken and Co
Priority to US11/123,354 priority Critical patent/US20050208856A1/en
Publication of US20050208856A1 publication Critical patent/US20050208856A1/en
Abandoned legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A41—WEARING APPAREL
    • A41D—OUTERWEAR; PROTECTIVE GARMENTS; ACCESSORIES
    • A41D31/00—Materials specially adapted for outerwear
    • A41D31/04—Materials specially adapted for outerwear characterised by special function or use
    • A41D31/08—Heat resistant; Fire retardant
    • D—TEXTILES; PAPER
    • D03—WEAVING
    • D03D—WOVEN FABRICS; METHODS OF WEAVING; LOOMS
    • D03D15/00—Woven fabrics characterised by the material, structure or properties of the fibres, filaments, yarns, threads or other warp or weft elements used
    • D03D15/50—Woven fabrics characterised by the material, structure or properties of the fibres, filaments, yarns, threads or other warp or weft elements used characterised by the properties of the yarns or threads
    • D03D15/513—Woven fabrics characterised by the material, structure or properties of the fibres, filaments, yarns, threads or other warp or weft elements used characterised by the properties of the yarns or threads heat-resistant or fireproof
    • D—TEXTILES; PAPER
    • D10—INDEXING SCHEME ASSOCIATED WITH SUBLASSES OF SECTION D, RELATING TO TEXTILES
    • D10B—INDEXING SCHEME ASSOCIATED WITH SUBLASSES OF SECTION D, RELATING TO TEXTILES
    • D10B2331/00—Fibres made from polymers obtained otherwise than by reactions only involving carbon-to-carbon unsaturated bonds, e.g. polycondensation products
    • D10B2331/02—Fibres made from polymers obtained otherwise than by reactions only involving carbon-to-carbon unsaturated bonds, e.g. polycondensation products polyamides
    • D10B2331/021—Fibres made from polymers obtained otherwise than by reactions only involving carbon-to-carbon unsaturated bonds, e.g. polycondensation products polyamides aromatic polyamides, e.g. aramides
    • Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y10—TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC
    • Y10T—TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER US CLASSIFICATION
    • Y10T442/00—Fabric [woven, knitted, or nonwoven textile or cloth, etc.]
    • Y10T442/30—Woven fabric [i.e., woven strand or strip material]
    • Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y10—TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC
    • Y10T—TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER US CLASSIFICATION
    • Y10T442/00—Fabric [woven, knitted, or nonwoven textile or cloth, etc.]
    • Y10T442/30—Woven fabric [i.e., woven strand or strip material]
    • Y10T442/3065—Including strand which is of specific structural definition
    • Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y10—TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC
    • Y10T—TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER US CLASSIFICATION
    • Y10T442/00—Fabric [woven, knitted, or nonwoven textile or cloth, etc.]
    • Y10T442/30—Woven fabric [i.e., woven strand or strip material]
    • Y10T442/3065—Including strand which is of specific structural definition
    • Y10T442/313—Strand material formed of individual filaments having different chemical compositions
    • Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y10—TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC
    • Y10T—TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER US CLASSIFICATION
    • Y10T442/00—Fabric [woven, knitted, or nonwoven textile or cloth, etc.]
    • Y10T442/30—Woven fabric [i.e., woven strand or strip material]
    • Y10T442/3065—Including strand which is of specific structural definition
    • Y10T442/313—Strand material formed of individual filaments having different chemical compositions
    • Y10T442/3138—Including inorganic filament
    • Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y10—TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC
    • Y10T—TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER US CLASSIFICATION
    • Y10T442/00—Fabric [woven, knitted, or nonwoven textile or cloth, etc.]
    • Y10T442/30—Woven fabric [i.e., woven strand or strip material]
    • Y10T442/3472—Woven fabric including an additional woven fabric layer
    • Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y10—TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC
    • Y10T—TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER US CLASSIFICATION
    • Y10T442/00—Fabric [woven, knitted, or nonwoven textile or cloth, etc.]
    • Y10T442/30—Woven fabric [i.e., woven strand or strip material]
    • Y10T442/3472—Woven fabric including an additional woven fabric layer
    • Y10T442/348—Mechanically needled or hydroentangled
    • Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y10—TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC
    • Y10T—TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER US CLASSIFICATION
    • Y10T442/00—Fabric [woven, knitted, or nonwoven textile or cloth, etc.]
    • Y10T442/30—Woven fabric [i.e., woven strand or strip material]
    • Y10T442/3976—Including strand which is stated to have specific attributes [e.g., heat or fire resistance, chemical or solvent resistance, high absorption for aqueous composition, water solubility, heat shrinkability, etc.]
    • Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y10—TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC
    • Y10T—TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER US CLASSIFICATION
    • Y10T442/00—Fabric [woven, knitted, or nonwoven textile or cloth, etc.]
    • Y10T442/30—Woven fabric [i.e., woven strand or strip material]
    • Y10T442/3976—Including strand which is stated to have specific attributes [e.g., heat or fire resistance, chemical or solvent resistance, high absorption for aqueous composition, water solubility, heat shrinkability, etc.]
    • Y10T442/3984—Strand is other than glass and is heat or fire resistant

Definitions

  • a variety of occupations require workers to come into close contact with hot equipment, hot substances open flames, and electric arcs and the like.
  • hot equipment hot substances open flames, and electric arcs and the like.
  • oil refinery petro chemical workers, electricians, military personnel, etc. typically operate in such environments.
  • workers typically wear flame resistant apparel.
  • Flame resistant garments are generally made from flame resistant materials such as those made from aramid fibers (including meta-aramids and para-aramids), melamine fibers, or those treated with flame resistant “FR” chemistries.
  • Prior protective garments have focused strictly on flame resistant protection and durability, since the garments must provide good protection to the wearer, and must withstand hazardous environments.
  • many garments are often laundered under industrial wash conditions, they must be capable of withstanding a number of such industrial launderings in order to have an acceptable useful life. For example, it is generally considered by the purchasers of these garments that the garments must last through a minimum of 125 industrial launderings.
  • the prior garments which have tended to perform relatively well from the standpoint of protection and durability, have been extremely deficient in aesthetic characteristics such as wearer comfort. For example, they are known to be stiff and to have a harsh handle, and they are generally considered to be hot and uncomfortable to the wearers. Not only is the discomfort typically associated with these garments a source of displeasure to the wearers, but it may discourage them from wearing the equipment that would optimize their protection, thereby jeopardizing their safety. Furthermore, these garments are typically so uncomfortable as to require an undergarment of some sort to protect the wearer's skin, which can be undesirable when the garment is to be worn in hot environments.
  • FR apparel fabrics There are two general types of FR apparel fabrics currently in the market.
  • the first category is that of inherently flame resistant fibers (such as aramids, melamines, etc.) and the second category achieves flame resistance primarily through the subsequent application of chemistry to the fiber.
  • Fabrics of inherently FR fibers are generally considered to provide greater durability, while chemically-treated fabrics (such as FR cotton) are often considered to provide a lesser degree of durability but at a lesser degree of discomfort to the wearer.
  • the general predictors of how comfortable a fabric will be to wear are the mechanical and surface properties of the fabric, the freedom of movement it affords a wearer (e.g. by draping well rather than being stiff), how well it manages moisture, and its air permeability.
  • how comfortable a wearer will perceive a garment to be will also depend largely upon which part of the wearer's body the garment is worn and the environment (e.g. hot or cold, humid or dry, etc.) in which it is worn.
  • the present invention is directed to flame resistant fabrics that provide good protection to the wearer from short exposure open flame, and/or electric arc, while also providing enhanced aesthetics.
  • the fabrics of the invention have superior hand, physical strength, durability, moisture transport, and soil release, and are more comfortable to the wearer than existing fabrics having comparable levels of FR protection.
  • the fabric is a woven fabric having a weight of about 2 to about 12 oz/sq yard, and more preferably about 4 to about 8 oz/sq yard.
  • fabrics in these weight ranges are particularly good in apparel type applications.
  • the fabric can be of any desired weave construction, including but not limited to plain weave, twill weave (e.g. 2 ⁇ 1, 2 ⁇ 2, 3 ⁇ 1, etc.), basket weave, ripstop, and oxford weave.
  • the fabrics of the invention desirably comprise inherently flame resistant fibers (“FR fibers”).
  • FR fibers inherently flame resistant fibers
  • the fabric is made predominately from (e.g. at least about 65%), or substantially entirely from, FR fibers.
  • fabric blends including about 90% to 95% FR fibers perform well.
  • the fabric may also include minor amounts of additional fibers to enhance certain characteristics of the fabric (e.g. physical, aesthetic, and/or performance characteristics such as, but not limited to strength, static dissipation, abrasion resistance, etc. without adversely impacting FR resistance to a substantial extent.
  • at least some of the FR fibers are provided in staple form and even more preferably substantially all of the FR fibers are provided in staple fiber form.
  • the fabric is a woven fabric, it has been found to be desirable to include spun yarns in at least the fabric warp.
  • the FR fibers can be of any commercially available variety within the scope of the invention, but are desirably selected from the group consisting of aramid fibers, meta-aramids, para-aramids, fluoropolymers and copolymers thereof, chloropolymers, polybenzimidazole, polyimides, polyamideimides, partially oxidized polyacrylonitriles, novoloids, poly(p-phenylene benzobisoazoles), poly)p-phenylene benzothiazoles), polyphenylene sulfides, flame retardant viscose rayons, polyvinyl chloride homopolymers and copolymers thereof, polyetheretherketones, polyketones, polyetherimides, polylactides, melamine fibers, or combinations thereof with other FR fibers or fibers that are not inherently flame resistant.
  • spun yarns made from inherently FR fibers include minor quantities of other types of fibers such as Kevlar® brand fiber available from DuPont of Wilmington, Del., nylon, P-140 nylon with carbon core from DuPont, or the like, to enhance a fabric's strength, durability, ability to be processed in conventional textile equipment, etc.
  • a preferred fabric of the invention is made from Nomex® IIIA yarns, which contain approximately 95% aramid fiber, and 5% other fibers (Kevlar®) aramid and P-140 nylon/carbon), and are available from I.E. DuPont de Nemours of Wilmington, Del.
  • Examples of some other commercially available FR fibers are those sold under the tradenames Kermel and Basofil, available from Rhodia of Colmar, France, and McKinnon-Land of Charlotte, N.C., respectfully.
  • the fabric of the invention is made by processing the fabric comprising inherently FR fibers with a fluid process designed to raise loops of fibers outwardly from the fabric surface, and form a plurality of fiber tangles that are primarily composed of fibers that are substantially intact and undamaged.
  • the fluid treatment process also desirably separates at least a portion of the plies from each other, detwists them, and causes fibers from adjacent plies to become entangled with each other.
  • FIG. 1 is a photomicrograph (30 ⁇ magnification) of the unenhanced fabric of Example A;
  • FIG. 2 is a photomicrograph (30 ⁇ magnification) of the enhanced fabric of Example B;
  • FIG. 3 is a photomicrograph (100 ⁇ magnification) of the unenhanced fabric according to Example A;
  • FIG. 4 is a photomicrograh (100 ⁇ magnification) of the enhanced fabric of Example B below;
  • FIG. 5 is a photomicrograph (200 ⁇ magnification) of the unenhanced fabric of Example A.
  • FIG. 6 is a photomicrograph (200 ⁇ magnification) of the enhanced fabric of Example B below.
  • the fabric of the invention desirably comprises inherently flame resistant fibers (“FR fibers”).
  • FR fibers inherently flame resistant fibers
  • the fabric includes at least about 65% FR fibers, more preferably at least about 90% FR fibers, and even more preferably, at least about 95% FR fibers.
  • at least some of the FR fibers are provided in staple form and even more preferably, substantially all of the FR fibers are provided in the form of spun yarns.
  • spun yarns can be made by a variety of production methods, including but not limited to open end spinning, air jet spinning, vortex spinning, ring spinning and the like.
  • the fabric is made substantially entirely from spun yarns.
  • the yarns are formed of plural plies.
  • each of the plies comprises FR staple fibers.
  • plied spun yarns are provided in at least the fabric warp.
  • the fabric is a woven fabric having a weight of about 2 to about 12 oz/sq yard, and more preferably about 4 to about 8 oz/sq yard.
  • the fabric is to be used in the manufacture of industrial clothing such as pants, shirts and overalls, it has been found that fabrics having a weight of about 5.5-6.5 oz/ sq yd, and more preferably about 5.8-6.2 oz/sq yard perform well.
  • a fabric having an approximate weight of about 6 oz/sq yd would perform well as an industrial bottom weight fabric.
  • the fabric is preferably a woven fabric, and can be of any desired weave construction, including but not limited to plain weave, twill weave (e.g. 2 ⁇ 1, 2 ⁇ 2, 3 ⁇ 1, etc.), basket weave, oxford weave, satin weave, and jacquard weave.
  • the fabrics can be woven according to conventional weaving processes.
  • the fabric desirably has first and second surfaces, with at least one surface having a plurality of fiber tangles that are composed primarily of fibers that are substantially intact and undamaged.
  • the individual plies are desirably at least partially separated from each other and individual fibers from different plies are entangled with each other.
  • FIGS. 1, 3 and 5 are photomicrographs at 30 ⁇ , 100 ⁇ , and 200 ⁇ magnification
  • FIGS. 2, 4 and 6 are photomicrographs at the same levels of magnification (i.e 30 ⁇ , 100 ⁇ and 200 ⁇ , respectively) of the fabrics of the invention.
  • the fabrics of the invention are characterized by a plurality of fiber tangles or teased loops that are comprised of fibers that are substantially intact and undamaged, as opposed to the unenhanced fabrics which have very little entanglement of the fibers and little surface effect.
  • the plied yarns used in this embodiment of the invention are at least partially separated into their individual components and in some cases, the fibers from the individual components are also entangled with each other. This characteristic was not only unexpected, but it has been found to provide a unique and dramatic improvement in aesthetic and hand characteristics as compared with the untreated fabric, while retaining good fiber strength and FR characteristics as well.
  • One method of manufacturing the fabrics of the instant invention is as follows: a fabric as described above is woven or obtained. The fabric is then subjected to a high pressure fluid stream that is designed to soften and loft the fabric.
  • a fluid process that may be used is a hydraulic process of the variety described in commonly-assigned co-pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/344,596 to Emery et al, filed Jun. 25, 1999, the disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference.
  • the type of fabric treatment and treatment parameters were selected to optimize the aesthetic characteristics of the fabric. Where multi-ply yarns are used, the high pressure stream also was surprisingly found to separate the plies from each other and to de-twist the yarns to some extent.
  • the fabric can be treated on one or both fabric surfaces, depending on the desired end result. Also, if desired, one or more chemistries designed to enhance the fabric characteristics can be applied, either prior or subsequent to the hydraulic processing.
  • the fabric can be dyed to achieve an aesthetically appealing color, as desired.
  • the dye process can be selected to optimize processing for the particular fiber content of the fabric and color desired. In the instant case, it has been found that using cationic dyes of the variety recommended by dye manufacturers for dyeing Nomex®) aramid fibers in a jet dye process at temperatures from about 220 degrees to about 270 degrees F. (and more preferably from about 250-270° F.) achieves a good color shade and fabrics having good colorfastness.
  • chemistries can be applied to the fabric at any stage of the process, including before, during or after dyeing.
  • additional characteristics such as moisture wicking, soil release, hand improvements, etc. can be obtained via chemical means.
  • ethoxylated polyamide traditionally used as a lubricant for nylon
  • a high molecular weight ethoxylated polyester typically used to enhance softness, wicking and stain release
  • fabrics having soil release and moisture transmission characteristics superior to those of commercially available fabrics were achieved at comparable levels of FR protection.
  • this superior soil release will also enhance the FR protection provided by the fabrics during their useful lives, since the fabrics of the invention will more readily release flammable soils such as oil and the like.
  • the fabrics are then desirably dried in a conventional manner, such as by running them through a heated tenter frame at a temperature of between about 325 and about 425 degrees F.
  • the fabrics of the invention have superior aesthetic characteristics (e.g. hand), as well as superior durability and performance (as evidenced by the test data below.) In addition, the fabrics had superior performance in the features correlating to enhanced wearer comfort. Furthermore, the fabrics had a unique surface characteristic, heretofore unachieved in FR fabrics.
  • Example A A fabric was woven from 30/2 100% Nomex IIIA® air-jet spun yarns (95% Aramid, 3% Kevlar®, and 2% Nylon P-140 (from DuPont) with a twist multiple of 14 of the variety available from Pharr Yarns of McAdenville, N.C. in a 1 ⁇ 1 plain weave construction.
  • the fabric was jet dyed in a conventional manner using cationic dyes of the variety conventionally recommended for the dyeing of the Nomex, and acid dyes of the variety commonly used to dye nylon (both of which will be readily appreciated by those of ordinary skill in the art. Dyeing was performed at approximately 266° F. for one hour.
  • the fabric was then passed through a pad containing 1-1 ⁇ 2% Lurotex A-25 ethoxylated polyamide (distributed by BASF of Mount Olive, N.J.) and 1-1 ⁇ 2% Lubril QCX high molecular weight ethoxylated polyester manufactured by Tennessee Eastman (to facilitate stain release and wicking).
  • the fabric was then dried in a conventional manner on a tenter frame at about 410° F. at a speed of approximately 25 yards per minute, after which the fabric was taken up for inspection.
  • the finished product was nominally 68 ends per inch ⁇ 44 picks per inch, and was 5.89 oz/sq yd in weight.
  • Example B A fabric was woven in the same manner as Example A. However, prior to the jet dyeing step, it was run through a pad containing 1% Lubril QCX, a high molecular weight ethoxylated polyester of the variety designed to promote stain release (1% Lubril QCX from Tennessee Eastman), then the fabric was impacted by water jets on each of its face and back in the manner described in commonly-assigned co-pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/344,596 to Emery et al, filed Jun. 25, 1999.
  • the fabric was pulled through the pad and hydraulically treated at a speed of 30 yards per minute, and hydraulic treatment was performed using 1200 psi of the front side of the fabric and 800 psi on the opposite side of the fabric (manifold exit pressure).
  • the water originated from a linear series of nozzles which were rectangular 0.015 inches wide, (filling direction) ⁇ 0.010 inches high (warp direction) in shape and were equally spaced along the treatment zone. There were 40 nozzles per inch along the width of the manifold.
  • the fabric traveled over a smooth stainless steel roll that was positioned 0.120 inches from the nozzles. The nozzles were directed downward about five degrees from perpendicular, and the water streams intersected the fabric path as the fabric was moving away from the surface of the roll.
  • the tension in the fabric within the first treatment zone was set at about 45 pounds.
  • the opposite side of the fabric was treated with high pressure water that originated from a similar series of nozzles as described above.
  • the water pressure was about 800 psig
  • the gap between the nozzles and the treatment roll was about 0.120 inches
  • the nozzles were directed downward about five degrees from perpendicular.
  • the water streams intersected the fabric path as the fabric was moving away from the surface of the roll.
  • the fabric tension between the treatment zones was set at about 85 pounds, and the fabric exit tension was set at about 90 pounds.
  • the fabric was then dried to remove 95% of the moisture.
  • the fabric was then dyed and finished in the same manner as Example A.
  • Example C A fabric was produced in the same manner as Example B, except the pressures used during hydraulic processing were 1100 on the front side of the fabric and 800 on the back side of the fabric.
  • Example D A commercially available 6.39 oz/ sq yd plain woven 100% Nomex® IIIA aramid fabric of the variety typically used for coveralls or pants was obtained. It is believed that the fabric was finished with hand builders for added stiffness. The fabric had 26.46/2 MJS yarns (1.67 dpf) in the warp and 27.32/2 MJS yarns (1.76 dpf) in the filling. The fabric had approximately 66 ends per inch (epi) and 47 picks per inch (ppi), and had been dyed a navy color.
  • Example E is a commercially available 6.00 oz/sq yd plain woven 100% Nomex® IIIA aramid fabric.
  • the fabric had 28.74/2 MJS yarns (1.72 dpf) in the warp and 28.85/2 MJS yarns (1.76 dpf) in the filling.
  • the fabric had approximately 66 epi and 42 ppi, and had been dyed a spruce green color.
  • Example F is a commercially available 6.05 oz/sq yd plain woven 100% Nomex® IIIA aramid fabric.
  • the fabric had 27.37/2 MJS yarns (1.71 dpf) in the warp and 28.41 MJS (1.74 dpf) yarns in the filling.
  • the fabric had approximately 65 epi and 44 ppi.
  • the fabric had been dyed a royal blue color.
  • Example G is a commercially available 6.39 oz/ sq yd plain woven 100% Nomex® IIIA aramid fabric of the variety typically used for outer clothing was obtained. It is believed that the fabric was finished with hand builders for added stiffness. The fabric had 26.46/2 MJS yarns (1.67 dpf) in the warp and 27.32/2 MJS yarns (1.76 dpf) in the filling. The fabric had approximately 66 ends per inch (epi) and 47 picks per inch (ppi), and had been dyed a navy blue color.
  • Example H was another commercially available FR fabric.
  • the fabric was a 7 oz. 3 ⁇ 1 lefthand twill woven 100% cotton FR treated fabric having 92 epi ⁇ 49 ppi, with 17.82/1 ring spun yarns in the warp and 12.08/1 RS yarns in the filling.
  • the fabric had been dyed a navy blue color. It is believed that the FR treatment was achieved through a conventional ammonia treatment.
  • Example I was a commercially available 9 oz/sq yd 3 ⁇ 1 lefthand twill woven 100% cotton FR treated fabric.
  • the fabric had 87 ends per inch and 50 picks per inch using 12.44/1 ring spun yarns in the warp and 8.53/1 ring spun yarns in the filling.
  • the fabric had been dyed a khaki color. It is believed that the FR treatment was achieved through a conventional ammonia treatment.
  • Example J was another commercially available FR fabric.
  • the fabric was a 7 oz. 88% cotton/12% nylon fabric.
  • the fabric had 93 epi ⁇ 50 ppi, with 18.12/1 RS yarns in the warp and 11.89/1 RS yarns in the filling.
  • the fabric had been dyed a khaki color. It is believed that the FR treatment was achieved through a conventional ammonia treatment.
  • Example K was another commercially available FR fabric.
  • the fabric was 9.68 oz. 88% cotton/12% nylon 3 ⁇ 1 twill woven fabric.
  • the fabric had 92 epi ⁇ 50 ppi, and 12.56 RS yarns in the warp and 8.58/1 RS yarns in the filling.
  • the fabric had been dyed a navy blue color. It is believed that the FR treatment was achieved through a conventional ammonia treatment.
  • the fabrics were all subjected to a variety of tests as outlined below.
  • the fabrics were tested in their as-produced form (unless otherwise specified in the test method), after 50 washes, and after 125 washes. All washes were performed in accordance with the Standard Formula Industrial Wash Method described below. The results of the tests are listed in the tables below.
  • the washing cycle was performed as follows: drop/fill/wash for 3 minutes at 140° F., low level water using 7.5 oz of Choice chemical; drop/fill/rinse for 2 minutes at 140° F., high level water, no chemical; drop/fill/rinse for 2 minutes at 80° F., high level water, no chemical; drop/fill/rinse for 2 minutes at 80° F., high level water, no chemical; drop/fill/wash for 4 minutes at 80° F., low level water using 0.3 oz acid sour; Extract water for 7 minutes at high speed.
  • Tensile strengths in both the warp and filling directions were measured according to ASTM D1682-75. Generally speaking, in a protective product/protective garment end use, relatively high tensile strengths are desired since they positively impact durability.
  • An exemplary industry specification for an industrial garment such as an overall or pant is 150 lbs in the warp and 100 lbs in the filling.
  • Tear strengths in both the warp and filling directions were measured according to ASTM D2262-83. Generally speaking, in a protective product/protective garment end use, relatively high tear strengths are considered to be desirable, since they correlate to durability.
  • An exemplary industry specification for an overall or pant garment is a tear strength of 7.5 lbs in the warp direction and 7.5 lbs in the filling direction.
  • Pilling was tested after 30 minutes, 60 minutes, and 90 minutes according to ASTM D3512-82. A higher pilling rating indicates that the fabric has a greater resistance to pilling.
  • a typical industry specification for an industrial garment such as an overall or a pant is 3.5-5 after 60 minutes.
  • Seam slippage was measured in both the warp and filling directions according to ASTM D434-75. Generally speaking, a higher seam slippage will enhance product durability and an exemplary industry specific for a fabric to be used in an industrial garment such as a pant or overall would be 30 lbs in each direction.
  • Abrasion resistance was measured according to ASTM D3886-80. The maximum reading that the test will register is 1000.
  • Fray was measured in both the warp and filling directions according to the following procedure, and the results recorded.
  • a set of five (5) 41 ⁇ 4′′ circle specimens of each sample are cut using a punch press machine, and are conditioned for one hour at 65% relative humidity ⁇ 5% at 70 ⁇ 5° F. (When cutting the samples, cut no closer to the selvage than 10% ( ⁇ 1%) of the fabric width, and mark the warp direction on each specimen.)
  • Wash appearance was rated according to AATCC Test Method 124-1996.
  • the fabrics are rated on a scale from 1 to 5, with a higher rating indicating that the fabric retains a better appearance following washing.
  • Wicking was measured using a vertical wicking test as follows. The test is used to determine the rate at which water will wick on test specimens suspended in water.
  • a higher score indicates the fabric has better wicking capability.
  • Wicking was also measured according to a drop disappearance test as follows. This test method is used to determine the efficiency of the fabric in transporting or wicking the moisture (such as an aqueous perspiration).
  • a sample large enough to test three different areas is required (preferably full fabric width).
  • Fabric thickness was measured according to ASTM D1777-1996.
  • Air permeability was measured according to AATCC Test Method 737-1996. In many applications (such as those where a wearer will wear the garment in a hot environment), higher air permeability will enhance the wearer's perception of the comfort of the garment. The air permeability is measured in cubic ft/min of air that travel through the fabric, with a higher number indicating that the fabric is more breathable.
  • Flammability (after flame) was measured according to National Fire Protection Agency (“NFPA”) Test Method 701-1989. The test indicates how long a fabric continues to burn after the flame has expired (with a lower number generally being preferable in an FR product.)
  • NFPA National Fire Protection Agency
  • Flammability (after glow) was measured according to NFPA Test Method 701-1989. This test indicates how long a fabric continues to glow after the flame has expired (with a lower number generally being preferably in an FR product.
  • Char Length was measured according to NFPA Test Method 701-1989. A lower char length indicates a lesser tendency of a fabric to burn. Generally, to be suitable for an FR garment, a fabric must have a char length of less than 4 inches.
  • TPP Thermal Protection Performance
  • Thermal Protection Performance was measured according to ASTM D4108-1996. A higher TPP value indicates that a fabric provides greater insulation.
  • Arc Thermal Protection Value was measured according to ASTM F 1959-1999. A minimum of twenty-one samples were tested for each fabric, and the results were averaged. A higher ATPV indicates that a fabric provides greater protection against electrical arc exposure.
  • Burns were conducted on the Pyroman equipment (such as that available at the test labs at North Carolina State University) according to NFPA Test Method 2112 for 3 seconds. The % total body burn after each of the burns was recorded. A lower % body burn indicates the product is more protective of a wearer or user. A typical industry specification for a 3 second burn for a industrial garment (such as a pant or overall) is ⁇ 50%.
  • Handle-o-meter readings were measured in each of the warp and filling directions according to the following method, using Handle-o-meter model number 211-300 from Thwing Albert.
  • T-3 Using the Handle-O-Meter template (T-3), cut out three samples (face up). Be sure to cut samples at least 50 mm from selvage and/or 50 mm away from cut end of cloth. Avoid areas that have a fold or crease. Cut one from the left side, one from the center, and one from the right side. Label samples to indicate from where they were cut, and mark the warp and filling directions. Ensure the MODE selector is set in the TEST mode. If the Handle-O-Meter is not zeroed, unlock the ZERO control, adjust the knob until the indicator reads ⁇ 000, then re-lock the ZERO control. Set MODE selector to PEAK. Place swatch over slot extending across the platform, FACE UP.
  • the drape coefficient was measured according to the following test process: Using an FRL® Drapemeter (of the variety described by Chu, C. C. , Cummings, C. L. and Teixeira, N. A., in “Mechanics of Elastic Performance of Textile Materials Part V: A Study of the Factors Affecting the Drape of Fabrics—The Development of a Drape Meter”, Textile Research Journal Vol 39 No. 8, 1950, pp. 539-548). This test is designed to determine the extent to which a fabric will deform when allowed to hang under its own weight, or by the ability of the fabric to drape by orienting itself into folds or pleats when acted upon by the force of gravity.
  • the test used an FRL® Drapemeter, a uniform grade of tracing paper, a balance and scissors.
  • the test specimens and tracing paper were conditioned to equilibrium and tested in the standard atmosphere of 65% relative humidity and 70° F. temperature. Moisture equilibrium shall be approached from the dry side (not moisture free.)
  • Six test specimens (3 face up, and 3 face down), 10 inches in diameter were cut from the fabric. The specimens were taken from the right, center and left fabric areas, but no closer to the selvage than 1/10 of the fabric width. The specimens were marked as to face and back.
  • a 10 inch diameter circle was cut from a uniform grade of tracing paper and it was weighed to the nearest milligram. The weight was recorded as W 1 .
  • a 4 inch diameter circle (to represent the annular support ring) was cut and weighed to the nearest milligram. The weight was recorded as W 2 .
  • a 10 inch diameter specimen was taken and a hole was made to mark the center of the test specimen. The specimen was placed on the support ring, and centered on the support.
  • a sheet of tracing paper was placed on the clear top side of the Drapemeter. With the light source on, the paper was centered about the projected image of the fabric specimen and the outline of the shadow image was carefully traced on the paper. The traced image was cut out and the image paper was weighed to the nearest milligram, and recorded as W 3 .
  • Drape coefficient [( W 3 ⁇ W 2 )/( W 1 ⁇ W 2 )] ⁇ 100, where
  • Drape Coefficient The six readings were averaged, and reported as the Drape Coefficient. If a side effect was noticed (back vs. face), sides are reported separately. A lower drape coefficient indicates that the fabric is more drapeable.
  • Ring test load (i.e. Fabric handle by ring tensile) was measured according to the following test method. The test involves pulling the fabric through a ring at a set rate to determine the forces associated with friction and bending. A 10 inch diameter circle of the fabric to be tested was cut. The center of the circle was marked. The tensile tester was set up with a 38 mm diameter ring with a radius of 24 mm. The test speed was set at 10 inches/minute. A string was attached to a small fishhook, with the barb removed, and it was attached to the center of the fabric via the fishhook. The other end of the string was attached to the crosshead of the tensile tester. The tester was started and run until the fabric was pulled completely through the ring. The force required to pull the fabric through the ring and the modulus of the initial folding of the fabric as it approached the ring were recorded. A lower ring test load value indicates that a fabric is more supple and flexible.
  • Kawabata System The Kawabata System was developed by Dr. Sueo Kawabata, Professor of Polymer Chemistry at Kyoto University in Japan, as a scientific means to measure, in an objective and reproducible way, the “hand” of textile fabrics. This is achieved by measuring basic mechanical properties that have been correlated with aesthetic properties relating to hand (e.g. smoothness, fullness, stiffness, softness, flexibility, and crispness), using a set of four highly specialized measuring devices that were developed specifically for use with the Kawabata System. These devices are as follows:
  • Kawabata Compression Tester (KES FB3)
  • Kawabata Surface Tester (KES FB4)
  • KES FB1 through 3 are manufactured by the Kato Iron Works Col, Ltd., Div. Of Instrumentation, Kyoto, Japan.
  • KES FB4 Kawabata Surface Tester
  • the measurements were performed according to the standard Kawabata Test Procedures, with four 8-inch ⁇ 8-inch samples of each type of fabric being tested, and the results averaged. Care was taken to avoid folding, wrinkling, stressing, or otherwise handling the samples in a way that would deform the sample.
  • the fabrics were tested in their as-manufactured form (i.e. they had not undergone subsequent launderings.) The die used to cut each sample was aligned with the yarns in the fabric to improve the accuracy of the measurements.
  • the testing equipment was set up according to the instructions in the Kawabata manual.
  • the Kawabata shear tester (KES FB1) was allowed to warm up for at least 15 minutes before being calibrated.
  • the tester was set up as follows:
  • the shear test measures the resistive forces when the fabric is given a constant tensile force and is subjected to a shear deformation in the direction perpendicular to the constant tensile force.
  • Mean shear stiffness was measured in each of the warp and filling directions. A lower value for shear stiffness is indicative of a more supple hand.
  • a lower value indicates that the fabric recovers more completely from shear deformation. This correlates to a more supple hand.
  • a lower value means a fabric is less stiff.
  • the testing equipment was set up according to the instructions in the Kawabata manual.
  • the Kawabata Compression Tester (KES FB3) was allowed to warm up for at least 15 minutes before being calibrated.
  • the tester was set up as follows:
  • the compression test measured the resistive forces experienced by a plunger having a certain surface area as it moves alternately toward and away from a fabric sample in a direction perpendicular to the fabric. The test ultimately measures the work done in compressing the fabric (forward direction) to a preset maximum force and the work done while decompressing the fabric (reverse direction).
  • Thickness [mm] at maximum pressure (nominal is 50 gf/cm 2 ). A higher TMAX indicates a loftier fabric.
  • TIN Minimum Thickness
  • TMIN Density at TMIN (DMIN). Less is generally considered to be better) T min [g/cm 3 ]
  • the testing equipment was set up according to the instructions in the Kawabata Manual.
  • the Kawabata Surface Tester (KES FB4) was allowed to warm up for at least 15 minutes before being calibrated.
  • the tester was set up as follows:
  • the surface test measures frictional properties and geometric roughness properties of the surface of the fabric.
  • SMD Surface roughness
  • EMT Percent Extensibility
  • the hand improvements were achieved while the strength of the fabric was maintained, and in fact, some strength measurements were improved.
  • the fabrics of the invention had superior ATPV, lower char length, better warp fray, superior drape and bending modulus, better wicking and soil release, and better combination of comfort characteristics with a particular level of FR.
  • the fabrics had comfort levels approximating those of cotton, while at durability levels approximating those of fabrics made from inherently FR fabrics. Furthermore, because of the improved soil release characteristics and reduced soil retention, it is expected that the fabrics would be less likely to hold onto oily stains that might otherwise adversely impact the FR potential of the fabrics.
  • Handle-o-meter measurements on the unwashed fabrics of the present invention are substantially better than those of the conventional fabrics, which is indicative of the superior drape (and thus perceived comfort) that they possess.
  • the fabrics of the present invention have utility in a variety of end uses, including but not limited to protective apparel, industrial work apparel (i.e. that designed to be worn in an industrial environment and laundered under industrial wash conditions), military apparel, transportation vehicle interiors (including but not limited to aviation, boat, car, bus, train, RV etc. interiors), industrial fire barriers, home and office furnishings, office panels, and virtually anywhere that FR protection would be of advantage.
  • industrial work apparel i.e. that designed to be worn in an industrial environment and laundered under industrial wash conditions
  • military apparel i.e. that designed to be worn in an industrial environment and laundered under industrial wash conditions
  • transportation vehicle interiors including but not limited to aviation, boat, car, bus, train, RV etc. interiors
  • industrial fire barriers home and office furnishings, office panels, and virtually anywhere that FR protection would be of advantage.

Abstract

Fabrics having improved aesthetic characteristics in addition to good FR characteristics and strength are described, as well as a method for making the fabrics. The fabrics are made by subjecting a fabric containing inherently flame resistant fibers to a fluid treatment process such that a fabric with good comfort and aesthetic characteristics is formed. In one form of the invention, the fabric comprises plied yarns, and the fluid treatment process serves to separate the plies from each other. The fabrics have a soft hand, good protective characteristics, good strength and durability, as well as good wicking and soil release characteristics.

Description

    BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
  • A variety of occupations require workers to come into close contact with hot equipment, hot substances open flames, and electric arcs and the like. For example, oil refinery, petro chemical workers, electricians, military personnel, etc. typically operate in such environments. In order to minimize their risk of injury from the hot elements, such workers typically wear flame resistant apparel.
  • Flame resistant garments are generally made from flame resistant materials such as those made from aramid fibers (including meta-aramids and para-aramids), melamine fibers, or those treated with flame resistant “FR” chemistries. Prior protective garments have focused strictly on flame resistant protection and durability, since the garments must provide good protection to the wearer, and must withstand hazardous environments. In addition, because many garments are often laundered under industrial wash conditions, they must be capable of withstanding a number of such industrial launderings in order to have an acceptable useful life. For example, it is generally considered by the purchasers of these garments that the garments must last through a minimum of 125 industrial launderings. Therefore, the prior garments, which have tended to perform relatively well from the standpoint of protection and durability, have been extremely deficient in aesthetic characteristics such as wearer comfort. For example, they are known to be stiff and to have a harsh handle, and they are generally considered to be hot and uncomfortable to the wearers. Not only is the discomfort typically associated with these garments a source of displeasure to the wearers, but it may discourage them from wearing the equipment that would optimize their protection, thereby jeopardizing their safety. Furthermore, these garments are typically so uncomfortable as to require an undergarment of some sort to protect the wearer's skin, which can be undesirable when the garment is to be worn in hot environments.
  • There are two general types of FR apparel fabrics currently in the market. The first category is that of inherently flame resistant fibers (such as aramids, melamines, etc.) and the second category achieves flame resistance primarily through the subsequent application of chemistry to the fiber. Fabrics of inherently FR fibers are generally considered to provide greater durability, while chemically-treated fabrics (such as FR cotton) are often considered to provide a lesser degree of durability but at a lesser degree of discomfort to the wearer.
  • Past attempts to improve the comfort of FR garments have generally been directed to the garment construction, e.g. through the provision of garment vents and the like. As will be appreciated by those of ordinary skill in the art, the garment construction modifications made to enhance comfort can have a negative effect on wearer protection.
  • Therefore, a need exists for fabrics and garments that provide a good degree of FR protection to users, while providing a greater degree of user comfort and improved aesthetic characteristics. In addition, a need exists for a method of enhancing the aesthetic characteristics of FR fabrics and garments.
    • SUMMARY
  • With the foregoing in mind, it is therefore an object of the invention to provide flame resistant fabrics having improved wearer comfort at comparable levels of FR protection and strength to conventional FR fabrics.
  • It is also an object of the invention to provide FR fabrics having improved aesthetics relative to commercially-available FR fabrics, and in particular, relative to commercially-available fabrics made from inherently FR fibers.
  • It is also an object of the invention to provide a method for enhancing the comfort of FR fabrics, and for manufacturing FR fabrics having good comfort and aesthetic characteristics in combination with good strength and durability.
  • It is a further object of the invention to provide an FR fabric having improved strength and moisture absorption with improved cleanability and a reduced tendency for soil redeposition.
  • The general predictors of how comfortable a fabric will be to wear are the mechanical and surface properties of the fabric, the freedom of movement it affords a wearer (e.g. by draping well rather than being stiff), how well it manages moisture, and its air permeability. In addition, how comfortable a wearer will perceive a garment to be will also depend largely upon which part of the wearer's body the garment is worn and the environment (e.g. hot or cold, humid or dry, etc.) in which it is worn.
  • The present invention is directed to flame resistant fabrics that provide good protection to the wearer from short exposure open flame, and/or electric arc, while also providing enhanced aesthetics. In particular, the fabrics of the invention have superior hand, physical strength, durability, moisture transport, and soil release, and are more comfortable to the wearer than existing fabrics having comparable levels of FR protection.
  • In a preferred form of the invention, the fabric is a woven fabric having a weight of about 2 to about 12 oz/sq yard, and more preferably about 4 to about 8 oz/sq yard. In particular, fabrics in these weight ranges are particularly good in apparel type applications. The fabric can be of any desired weave construction, including but not limited to plain weave, twill weave (e.g. 2×1, 2×2, 3×1, etc.), basket weave, ripstop, and oxford weave.
  • The fabrics of the invention desirably comprise inherently flame resistant fibers (“FR fibers”). In a preferred form of the invention, the fabric is made predominately from (e.g. at least about 65%), or substantially entirely from, FR fibers.
  • It has been found that fabric blends including about 90% to 95% FR fibers perform well. Where the fabric is made substantially entirely from FR fibers, it may also include minor amounts of additional fibers to enhance certain characteristics of the fabric (e.g. physical, aesthetic, and/or performance characteristics such as, but not limited to strength, static dissipation, abrasion resistance, etc. without adversely impacting FR resistance to a substantial extent. Preferably, at least some of the FR fibers are provided in staple form and even more preferably substantially all of the FR fibers are provided in staple fiber form. To this end, it has been found to be desirable to manufacture the fabric at least partially and preferably substantially entirely, from spun yarns. In particular, where the fabric is a woven fabric, it has been found to be desirable to include spun yarns in at least the fabric warp.
  • The FR fibers can be of any commercially available variety within the scope of the invention, but are desirably selected from the group consisting of aramid fibers, meta-aramids, para-aramids, fluoropolymers and copolymers thereof, chloropolymers, polybenzimidazole, polyimides, polyamideimides, partially oxidized polyacrylonitriles, novoloids, poly(p-phenylene benzobisoazoles), poly)p-phenylene benzothiazoles), polyphenylene sulfides, flame retardant viscose rayons, polyvinyl chloride homopolymers and copolymers thereof, polyetheretherketones, polyketones, polyetherimides, polylactides, melamine fibers, or combinations thereof with other FR fibers or fibers that are not inherently flame resistant. In many instances, commercially-available spun yarns made from inherently FR fibers include minor quantities of other types of fibers such as Kevlar® brand fiber available from DuPont of Wilmington, Del., nylon, P-140 nylon with carbon core from DuPont, or the like, to enhance a fabric's strength, durability, ability to be processed in conventional textile equipment, etc. For example, a preferred fabric of the invention is made from Nomex® IIIA yarns, which contain approximately 95% aramid fiber, and 5% other fibers (Kevlar®) aramid and P-140 nylon/carbon), and are available from I.E. DuPont de Nemours of Wilmington, Del. Examples of some other commercially available FR fibers are those sold under the tradenames Kermel and Basofil, available from Rhodia of Colmar, France, and McKinnon-Land of Charlotte, N.C., respectfully.
  • The fabric of the invention is made by processing the fabric comprising inherently FR fibers with a fluid process designed to raise loops of fibers outwardly from the fabric surface, and form a plurality of fiber tangles that are primarily composed of fibers that are substantially intact and undamaged. Where the fabric comprises plied yarns, the fluid treatment process also desirably separates at least a portion of the plies from each other, detwists them, and causes fibers from adjacent plies to become entangled with each other.
    • BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
  • FIG. 1 is a photomicrograph (30× magnification) of the unenhanced fabric of Example A;
  • FIG. 2 is a photomicrograph (30× magnification) of the enhanced fabric of Example B;
  • FIG. 3 is a photomicrograph (100× magnification) of the unenhanced fabric according to Example A;
  • FIG. 4 is a photomicrograh (100× magnification) of the enhanced fabric of Example B below;
  • FIG. 5 is a photomicrograph (200× magnification) of the unenhanced fabric of Example A; and
  • FIG. 6 is a photomicrograph (200× magnification) of the enhanced fabric of Example B below.
    • DETAILED DESCRIPTION
  • In the following detailed description of the invention, specific preferred embodiments of the invention are described to enable a full and complete understanding of the invention. It will be recognized that it is not intended to limit the invention to the particular preferred embodiment described, and although specific terms are employed in describing the invention, such terms are used in a descriptive sense for the purpose of illustration and not for the purpose of limitation.
  • The fabric of the invention desirably comprises inherently flame resistant fibers (“FR fibers”). In a preferred form of the invention, the fabric includes at least about 65% FR fibers, more preferably at least about 90% FR fibers, and even more preferably, at least about 95% FR fibers. Preferably, at least some of the FR fibers are provided in staple form and even more preferably, substantially all of the FR fibers are provided in the form of spun yarns. As will be appreciated by those of ordinary skill in the art, spun yarns can be made by a variety of production methods, including but not limited to open end spinning, air jet spinning, vortex spinning, ring spinning and the like.
  • In a preferred form of the invention, the fabric is made substantially entirely from spun yarns. Also in a preferred form of the invention, the yarns are formed of plural plies. Preferably, each of the plies comprises FR staple fibers. Where the fabric of the invention is in the form of a woven fabric, it is particularly preferred that plied spun yarns are provided in at least the fabric warp.
  • In a preferred form of the invention, the fabric is a woven fabric having a weight of about 2 to about 12 oz/sq yard, and more preferably about 4 to about 8 oz/sq yard. Where the fabric is to be used in the manufacture of industrial clothing such as pants, shirts and overalls, it has been found that fabrics having a weight of about 5.5-6.5 oz/ sq yd, and more preferably about 5.8-6.2 oz/sq yard perform well. For example, a fabric having an approximate weight of about 6 oz/sq yd would perform well as an industrial bottom weight fabric.
  • The fabric is preferably a woven fabric, and can be of any desired weave construction, including but not limited to plain weave, twill weave (e.g. 2×1, 2×2, 3×1, etc.), basket weave, oxford weave, satin weave, and jacquard weave. The fabrics can be woven according to conventional weaving processes.
  • The fabric desirably has first and second surfaces, with at least one surface having a plurality of fiber tangles that are composed primarily of fibers that are substantially intact and undamaged. When the fabric is formed from plied yarns, the individual plies are desirably at least partially separated from each other and individual fibers from different plies are entangled with each other.
  • As illustrated in the drawings, FIGS. 1, 3 and 5 are photomicrographs at 30×, 100×, and 200× magnification, while FIGS. 2, 4 and 6 are photomicrographs at the same levels of magnification (i.e 30×, 100× and 200×, respectively) of the fabrics of the invention. As can clearly be seen from the photomicrographs, the fabrics of the invention are characterized by a plurality of fiber tangles or teased loops that are comprised of fibers that are substantially intact and undamaged, as opposed to the unenhanced fabrics which have very little entanglement of the fibers and little surface effect. Also as shown, the plied yarns used in this embodiment of the invention are at least partially separated into their individual components and in some cases, the fibers from the individual components are also entangled with each other. This characteristic was not only unexpected, but it has been found to provide a unique and dramatic improvement in aesthetic and hand characteristics as compared with the untreated fabric, while retaining good fiber strength and FR characteristics as well.
  • One method of manufacturing the fabrics of the instant invention is as follows: a fabric as described above is woven or obtained. The fabric is then subjected to a high pressure fluid stream that is designed to soften and loft the fabric. One example of a fluid process that may be used is a hydraulic process of the variety described in commonly-assigned co-pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/344,596 to Emery et al, filed Jun. 25, 1999, the disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference. The type of fabric treatment and treatment parameters were selected to optimize the aesthetic characteristics of the fabric. Where multi-ply yarns are used, the high pressure stream also was surprisingly found to separate the plies from each other and to de-twist the yarns to some extent. It is believed that this lofting and ply separation dramatically enhanced the fabric hand and comfort, without adversely impacting fabric strength. The fabric can be treated on one or both fabric surfaces, depending on the desired end result. Also, if desired, one or more chemistries designed to enhance the fabric characteristics can be applied, either prior or subsequent to the hydraulic processing.
  • The fabric can be dyed to achieve an aesthetically appealing color, as desired. The dye process can be selected to optimize processing for the particular fiber content of the fabric and color desired. In the instant case, it has been found that using cationic dyes of the variety recommended by dye manufacturers for dyeing Nomex®) aramid fibers in a jet dye process at temperatures from about 220 degrees to about 270 degrees F. (and more preferably from about 250-270° F.) achieves a good color shade and fabrics having good colorfastness.
  • As noted above, chemistries can be applied to the fabric at any stage of the process, including before, during or after dyeing. In this way, additional characteristics such as moisture wicking, soil release, hand improvements, etc. can be obtained via chemical means. For example, it was surprisingly found that by applying an ethoxylated polyamide (traditionally used as a lubricant for nylon) and a high molecular weight ethoxylated polyester (typically used to enhance softness, wicking and stain release), fabrics having soil release and moisture transmission characteristics superior to those of commercially available fabrics were achieved at comparable levels of FR protection. Furthermore, it is believed that this superior soil release will also enhance the FR protection provided by the fabrics during their useful lives, since the fabrics of the invention will more readily release flammable soils such as oil and the like.
  • The fabrics are then desirably dried in a conventional manner, such as by running them through a heated tenter frame at a temperature of between about 325 and about 425 degrees F.
  • The fabrics of the invention have superior aesthetic characteristics (e.g. hand), as well as superior durability and performance (as evidenced by the test data below.) In addition, the fabrics had superior performance in the features correlating to enhanced wearer comfort. Furthermore, the fabrics had a unique surface characteristic, heretofore unachieved in FR fabrics.
    • EXAMPLES
  • Example A—A fabric was woven from 30/2 100% Nomex IIIA® air-jet spun yarns (95% Aramid, 3% Kevlar®, and 2% Nylon P-140 (from DuPont) with a twist multiple of 14 of the variety available from Pharr Yarns of McAdenville, N.C. in a 1×1 plain weave construction. The fabric was jet dyed in a conventional manner using cationic dyes of the variety conventionally recommended for the dyeing of the Nomex, and acid dyes of the variety commonly used to dye nylon (both of which will be readily appreciated by those of ordinary skill in the art. Dyeing was performed at approximately 266° F. for one hour. The fabric was then passed through a pad containing 1-½% Lurotex A-25 ethoxylated polyamide (distributed by BASF of Mount Olive, N.J.) and 1-½% Lubril QCX high molecular weight ethoxylated polyester manufactured by Tennessee Eastman (to facilitate stain release and wicking). The fabric was then dried in a conventional manner on a tenter frame at about 410° F. at a speed of approximately 25 yards per minute, after which the fabric was taken up for inspection. The finished product was nominally 68 ends per inch×44 picks per inch, and was 5.89 oz/sq yd in weight.
  • Example B—A fabric was woven in the same manner as Example A. However, prior to the jet dyeing step, it was run through a pad containing 1% Lubril QCX, a high molecular weight ethoxylated polyester of the variety designed to promote stain release (1% Lubril QCX from Tennessee Eastman), then the fabric was impacted by water jets on each of its face and back in the manner described in commonly-assigned co-pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/344,596 to Emery et al, filed Jun. 25, 1999. The fabric was pulled through the pad and hydraulically treated at a speed of 30 yards per minute, and hydraulic treatment was performed using 1200 psi of the front side of the fabric and 800 psi on the opposite side of the fabric (manifold exit pressure). The water originated from a linear series of nozzles which were rectangular 0.015 inches wide, (filling direction)×0.010 inches high (warp direction) in shape and were equally spaced along the treatment zone. There were 40 nozzles per inch along the width of the manifold. The fabric traveled over a smooth stainless steel roll that was positioned 0.120 inches from the nozzles. The nozzles were directed downward about five degrees from perpendicular, and the water streams intersected the fabric path as the fabric was moving away from the surface of the roll. The tension in the fabric within the first treatment zone was set at about 45 pounds. In the second treatment zone, the opposite side of the fabric was treated with high pressure water that originated from a similar series of nozzles as described above. In this zone the water pressure was about 800 psig, the gap between the nozzles and the treatment roll was about 0.120 inches, and the nozzles were directed downward about five degrees from perpendicular. As before, the water streams intersected the fabric path as the fabric was moving away from the surface of the roll. The fabric tension between the treatment zones was set at about 85 pounds, and the fabric exit tension was set at about 90 pounds. The fabric was then dried to remove 95% of the moisture. The fabric was then dyed and finished in the same manner as Example A. It was surprisingly found that the hydraulic processing served to distinctly separate the plies of the multi-ply yarns and entangle yarns from different plies, in addition to expanding and opening the interstices of the fabric, and that this particular hydraulic treatment process primarily affected the yarns in the fabric warp.
  • Example C—A fabric was produced in the same manner as Example B, except the pressures used during hydraulic processing were 1100 on the front side of the fabric and 800 on the back side of the fabric.
  • Example D—A commercially available 6.39 oz/ sq yd plain woven 100% Nomex® IIIA aramid fabric of the variety typically used for coveralls or pants was obtained. It is believed that the fabric was finished with hand builders for added stiffness. The fabric had 26.46/2 MJS yarns (1.67 dpf) in the warp and 27.32/2 MJS yarns (1.76 dpf) in the filling. The fabric had approximately 66 ends per inch (epi) and 47 picks per inch (ppi), and had been dyed a navy color.
  • Example E is a commercially available 6.00 oz/sq yd plain woven 100% Nomex® IIIA aramid fabric. The fabric had 28.74/2 MJS yarns (1.72 dpf) in the warp and 28.85/2 MJS yarns (1.76 dpf) in the filling. The fabric had approximately 66 epi and 42 ppi, and had been dyed a spruce green color.
  • Example F is a commercially available 6.05 oz/sq yd plain woven 100% Nomex® IIIA aramid fabric. The fabric had 27.37/2 MJS yarns (1.71 dpf) in the warp and 28.41 MJS (1.74 dpf) yarns in the filling. The fabric had approximately 65 epi and 44 ppi. The fabric had been dyed a royal blue color.
  • Example G is a commercially available 6.39 oz/ sq yd plain woven 100% Nomex® IIIA aramid fabric of the variety typically used for outer clothing was obtained. It is believed that the fabric was finished with hand builders for added stiffness. The fabric had 26.46/2 MJS yarns (1.67 dpf) in the warp and 27.32/2 MJS yarns (1.76 dpf) in the filling. The fabric had approximately 66 ends per inch (epi) and 47 picks per inch (ppi), and had been dyed a navy blue color.
  • Example H was another commercially available FR fabric. The fabric was a 7 oz. 3×1 lefthand twill woven 100% cotton FR treated fabric having 92 epi×49 ppi, with 17.82/1 ring spun yarns in the warp and 12.08/1 RS yarns in the filling. The fabric had been dyed a navy blue color. It is believed that the FR treatment was achieved through a conventional ammonia treatment.
  • Example I was a commercially available 9 oz/sq yd 3×1 lefthand twill woven 100% cotton FR treated fabric. The fabric had 87 ends per inch and 50 picks per inch using 12.44/1 ring spun yarns in the warp and 8.53/1 ring spun yarns in the filling. The fabric had been dyed a khaki color. It is believed that the FR treatment was achieved through a conventional ammonia treatment.
  • Example J was another commercially available FR fabric. The fabric was a 7 oz. 88% cotton/12% nylon fabric. The fabric had 93 epi×50 ppi, with 18.12/1 RS yarns in the warp and 11.89/1 RS yarns in the filling. The fabric had been dyed a khaki color. It is believed that the FR treatment was achieved through a conventional ammonia treatment.
  • Example K was another commercially available FR fabric. The fabric was 9.68 oz. 88% cotton/12% nylon 3×1 twill woven fabric. The fabric had 92 epi×50 ppi, and 12.56 RS yarns in the warp and 8.58/1 RS yarns in the filling. The fabric had been dyed a navy blue color. It is believed that the FR treatment was achieved through a conventional ammonia treatment.
  • The fabrics were all subjected to a variety of tests as outlined below. The fabrics were tested in their as-produced form (unless otherwise specified in the test method), after 50 washes, and after 125 washes. All washes were performed in accordance with the Standard Formula Industrial Wash Method described below. The results of the tests are listed in the tables below.
  • Test Methods
  • Standard Formula Industrial Wash Method—
  • All washings were performed according to the following wash method: Garments were washed in a conventional industrial washer at 80% capacity for 12 minutes at 140° F., using the low water level and 8.0 oz of Choice chemical, which is commercially from Washing Systems, Inc. of Cincinnati, Ohio. The washing cycle was performed as follows: drop/fill/wash for 3 minutes at 140° F., low level water using 7.5 oz of Choice chemical; drop/fill/rinse for 2 minutes at 140° F., high level water, no chemical; drop/fill/rinse for 2 minutes at 80° F., high level water, no chemical; drop/fill/rinse for 2 minutes at 80° F., high level water, no chemical; drop/fill/wash for 4 minutes at 80° F., low level water using 0.3 oz acid sour; Extract water for 7 minutes at high speed.
  • Tensile Strength—
  • Tensile strengths in both the warp and filling directions were measured according to ASTM D1682-75. Generally speaking, in a protective product/protective garment end use, relatively high tensile strengths are desired since they positively impact durability. An exemplary industry specification for an industrial garment such as an overall or pant is 150 lbs in the warp and 100 lbs in the filling.
  • Tear Strength—
  • Tear strengths in both the warp and filling directions were measured according to ASTM D2262-83. Generally speaking, in a protective product/protective garment end use, relatively high tear strengths are considered to be desirable, since they correlate to durability. An exemplary industry specification for an overall or pant garment is a tear strength of 7.5 lbs in the warp direction and 7.5 lbs in the filling direction.
  • Pilling—
  • Pilling was tested after 30 minutes, 60 minutes, and 90 minutes according to ASTM D3512-82. A higher pilling rating indicates that the fabric has a greater resistance to pilling. A typical industry specification for an industrial garment such as an overall or a pant is 3.5-5 after 60 minutes.
  • Seam Slippage—
  • Seam slippage was measured in both the warp and filling directions according to ASTM D434-75. Generally speaking, a higher seam slippage will enhance product durability and an exemplary industry specific for a fabric to be used in an industrial garment such as a pant or overall would be 30 lbs in each direction.
  • Stoll Flat Abrasion—
  • Abrasion resistance was measured according to ASTM D3886-80. The maximum reading that the test will register is 1000.
  • Stretch—Stretch in each of the warp and filling directions was measured according to ASTM D3107-75.
  • Fray—
  • Fray was measured in both the warp and filling directions according to the following procedure, and the results recorded. A set of five (5) 4¼″ circle specimens of each sample are cut using a punch press machine, and are conditioned for one hour at 65% relative humidity ±5% at 70±5° F. (When cutting the samples, cut no closer to the selvage than 10% (±1%) of the fabric width, and mark the warp direction on each specimen.) A Random Tumble Pilling Machine available from Atlas, Inc. If the cork liner in the pilling apparatus has been used more than 3 times, place a new cork liner into test cylinders of the pilling tester making sure they are fitted properly to give a smooth joint. Put the five specimens from one sample into a single test cylinder. Make sure all specimens are in the path of the rotor. Up to six samples can be tested at a time. When the tester is loaded, start it and tumble the specimen for a period of 10 minutes (±30 seconds.) After this time period, remove the specimen from the tester. Measure the diameter in the direction of the marking (←→) to measure the warp through the marking (↑↓) to measure the filling using a ⅛th inch graduated ruler R-9. Measure to first loose thread. The fraying value is expressed as a percentage and is calculated for both directions: % fray=(original length-tumbled length)/original length×100. (Note: original length=4.2) A lower fray value indicates a fabric has greater fray resistance. In particular, a lower warp fray value would suggest that a fabric would be more easily handled, thereby making product or garment manufacture more efficient.
  • Shrinkage—
  • Shrinkage in the warp and filling directions was measured according to AATCC Test Method 135-1995.
  • Appearance—
  • Wash appearance was rated according to AATCC Test Method 124-1996. The fabrics are rated on a scale from 1 to 5, with a higher rating indicating that the fabric retains a better appearance following washing.
  • Crease Retention—
  • Crease Retention was measured according to AATCC Test Method 39C-1984. Fabrics are rated on a scale from 1 to 5, with a higher rating indicating that a fabric has greater crease retention.
  • Soil Release—
  • The soil release properties of the fabrics were measured according to AATCC 130-1995 (corn oil), as follows: 0/1=Soiled prior to washing, tested after 1 wash. 4/5=Soiled after 4 washes, tested after 5 washes. 48/49=Soiled after 48 washes, tested after 49 washes. 48/50=Soiled after 48 washes, tested after 50 washes. 123/124=Soiled after 123 washes, tested after 124 washes. 123/125=Soiled after 123 washes, tested after 125 washes.
  • Vertical Wicking—
  • Wicking was measured using a vertical wicking test as follows. The test is used to determine the rate at which water will wick on test specimens suspended in water.
  • Equipment:
      • 1. 500 ml Erlenmeyer flasks
      • 2. Straight pins (approximately 3″ in length)
      • 3. Food coloring (any color to make water level visible on specimen)
  • Procedure:
  • 1. Fill 500 ml Erlenmeyer flasks with 200 ml colored water (fill as many flasks as specimens to be tested).
      • 2. A. Cut 6″×1″ strip of specimens to be tested (6″ length is cut in the wale direction).
      •  B. Pierce top edge of strip (approximately ⅛″-¼″ from top) with long straight pin.
      • 3. Suspend strip from pin in flask filled with 200 ml colored water.
      • 4. After 1 minute:
        • A. Remove strip from flask
        • B. Measure water level on strip in inches and record
        • C. Return strip to water
      • 5. Repeat steps A., B., and C., from above at the following time intervals; 3 minutes, 5 minutes, and each 5 minute interval following until the water level reaches 6″ or 1 hour has elapsed.
  • A higher score indicates the fabric has better wicking capability.
  • Drop Disappearance—
  • Wicking was also measured according to a drop disappearance test as follows. This test method is used to determine the efficiency of the fabric in transporting or wicking the moisture (such as an aqueous perspiration).
  • Equipment:
      • 1. Straight medicine dropper
      • 2. Stop watch
      • 3. Distilled water
      • 4. Embroidery hoops
  • Test Specimens:
  • A sample large enough to test three different areas is required (preferably full fabric width).
  • Procedure:
      • 1. Place the sample in an embroidery hoop and pull tight. (Care must be taken not to pull the sample too tight.)
      • 2. The tip of the dropper should be one inch from the sample. Allow one drop of water to fall onto the sample. Start timer immediately. Watch the drop of water until it disappears and stop the time. Record the time required for the drop to disappear.
      • 3. Repeat the above procedure on three different areas of each sample. Test samples “as received” and after five washings and tumble dryings, or as specified.
  • Report:
  • The average time required for the drop of water to disappear. A lower time indicates a fabric absorbs moisture more quickly.
  • Thickness—
  • Fabric thickness was measured according to ASTM D1777-1996.
  • Air Permeability—
  • Air permeability was measured according to AATCC Test Method 737-1996. In many applications (such as those where a wearer will wear the garment in a hot environment), higher air permeability will enhance the wearer's perception of the comfort of the garment. The air permeability is measured in cubic ft/min of air that travel through the fabric, with a higher number indicating that the fabric is more breathable.
  • Flammability (After Flame)—
  • Flammability (after flame) was measured according to National Fire Protection Agency (“NFPA”) Test Method 701-1989. The test indicates how long a fabric continues to burn after the flame has expired (with a lower number generally being preferable in an FR product.)
  • Flammability (After Glow)—
  • Flammability (after glow) was measured according to NFPA Test Method 701-1989. This test indicates how long a fabric continues to glow after the flame has expired (with a lower number generally being preferably in an FR product.
  • Flammability (Char Length)—
  • Char Length was measured according to NFPA Test Method 701-1989. A lower char length indicates a lesser tendency of a fabric to burn. Generally, to be suitable for an FR garment, a fabric must have a char length of less than 4 inches.
  • Thermal Protection Performance (TPP)—
  • Thermal Protection Performance was measured according to ASTM D4108-1996. A higher TPP value indicates that a fabric provides greater insulation.
  • Arc Thermal Protection Value (ATPV)—
  • Arc Thermal Protection Value was measured according to ASTM F 1959-1999. A minimum of twenty-one samples were tested for each fabric, and the results were averaged. A higher ATPV indicates that a fabric provides greater protection against electrical arc exposure.
  • Pyroman Test—
  • Burns were conducted on the Pyroman equipment (such as that available at the test labs at North Carolina State University) according to NFPA Test Method 2112 for 3 seconds. The % total body burn after each of the burns was recorded. A lower % body burn indicates the product is more protective of a wearer or user. A typical industry specification for a 3 second burn for a industrial garment (such as a pant or overall) is <50%.
  • Predicted Burn—
  • Also using the Pyroman equipment and test method described above, fabrics were tested at various flame exposure times, and the level of predicted burn (second degree, third degree, and total) were recorded. Several samples of each Example fabric were run.
  • Handle-O-Meter—
  • Handle-o-meter readings were measured in each of the warp and filling directions according to the following method, using Handle-o-meter model number 211-300 from Thwing Albert.
  • Using the Handle-O-Meter template (T-3), cut out three samples (face up). Be sure to cut samples at least 50 mm from selvage and/or 50 mm away from cut end of cloth. Avoid areas that have a fold or crease. Cut one from the left side, one from the center, and one from the right side. Label samples to indicate from where they were cut, and mark the warp and filling directions. Ensure the MODE selector is set in the TEST mode. If the Handle-O-Meter is not zeroed, unlock the ZERO control, adjust the knob until the indicator reads ±000, then re-lock the ZERO control. Set MODE selector to PEAK. Place swatch over slot extending across the platform, FACE UP. To check the warp, turn sample 90 degrees so that the sample top is on the left. To check the filling, place the sample in the machine with the sample top in the 12:00 position. Press START/RESET control. Test the samples, starting with the warp right, then test the filling right. Test the center and left side the same as above. Readings for standard should be recorded on 11ZHAND. Run Chart reading should be recorded on the correct style sheet and Data Document 11ZCTAN. When all 3 warps and all 3 fillings have been tested, average the warp and filling measurements and record. Repeat for additional set. A lower Handle-O-Meter reading indicates that the fabric is more flexible. Readings were recorded in units of grams-force.
  • Drape—
  • The drape coefficient was measured according to the following test process: Using an FRL® Drapemeter (of the variety described by Chu, C. C. , Cummings, C. L. and Teixeira, N. A., in “Mechanics of Elastic Performance of Textile Materials Part V: A Study of the Factors Affecting the Drape of Fabrics—The Development of a Drape Meter”, Textile Research Journal Vol 39 No. 8, 1950, pp. 539-548). This test is designed to determine the extent to which a fabric will deform when allowed to hang under its own weight, or by the ability of the fabric to drape by orienting itself into folds or pleats when acted upon by the force of gravity. The test used an FRL® Drapemeter, a uniform grade of tracing paper, a balance and scissors. The test specimens and tracing paper were conditioned to equilibrium and tested in the standard atmosphere of 65% relative humidity and 70° F. temperature. Moisture equilibrium shall be approached from the dry side (not moisture free.) Six test specimens (3 face up, and 3 face down), 10 inches in diameter were cut from the fabric. The specimens were taken from the right, center and left fabric areas, but no closer to the selvage than 1/10 of the fabric width. The specimens were marked as to face and back. A 10 inch diameter circle was cut from a uniform grade of tracing paper and it was weighed to the nearest milligram. The weight was recorded as W1. A 4 inch diameter circle (to represent the annular support ring) was cut and weighed to the nearest milligram. The weight was recorded as W2. A 10 inch diameter specimen was taken and a hole was made to mark the center of the test specimen. The specimen was placed on the support ring, and centered on the support. A sheet of tracing paper was placed on the clear top side of the Drapemeter. With the light source on, the paper was centered about the projected image of the fabric specimen and the outline of the shadow image was carefully traced on the paper. The traced image was cut out and the image paper was weighed to the nearest milligram, and recorded as W3.
  • The following calculation was made:
    Drape coefficient=[(W 3−W 2)/( W 1−W 2)]×100, where
      • W1=weight, 10 inch diameter paper, mg.
      • W2=weight, 4 inch diameter paper, mg
      • W3=weight, projected image, cut from paper used to obtain W1, mg.
  • The six readings were averaged, and reported as the Drape Coefficient. If a side effect was noticed (back vs. face), sides are reported separately. A lower drape coefficient indicates that the fabric is more drapeable.
  • Ring Test Load—
  • Ring test load (i.e. Fabric handle by ring tensile) was measured according to the following test method. The test involves pulling the fabric through a ring at a set rate to determine the forces associated with friction and bending. A 10 inch diameter circle of the fabric to be tested was cut. The center of the circle was marked. The tensile tester was set up with a 38 mm diameter ring with a radius of 24 mm. The test speed was set at 10 inches/minute. A string was attached to a small fishhook, with the barb removed, and it was attached to the center of the fabric via the fishhook. The other end of the string was attached to the crosshead of the tensile tester. The tester was started and run until the fabric was pulled completely through the ring. The force required to pull the fabric through the ring and the modulus of the initial folding of the fabric as it approached the ring were recorded. A lower ring test load value indicates that a fabric is more supple and flexible.
  • Kawabata Testing—
  • A variety of characteristics were measured using the Kawabata Evaluation System (“Kawabata System”). The Kawabata System was developed by Dr. Sueo Kawabata, Professor of Polymer Chemistry at Kyoto University in Japan, as a scientific means to measure, in an objective and reproducible way, the “hand” of textile fabrics. This is achieved by measuring basic mechanical properties that have been correlated with aesthetic properties relating to hand (e.g. smoothness, fullness, stiffness, softness, flexibility, and crispness), using a set of four highly specialized measuring devices that were developed specifically for use with the Kawabata System. These devices are as follows:
  • Kawabata Tensile and Shear Tester (KES FB1)
  • Kawabata Pure Bending Tester (KES FB2)
  • Kawabata Compression Tester (KES FB3)
  • Kawabata Surface Tester (KES FB4)
  • KES FB1 through 3 are manufactured by the Kato Iron Works Col, Ltd., Div. Of Instrumentation, Kyoto, Japan. KES FB4 (Kawabata Surface Tester) is manufactured by the Kato Tekko Co., Ltd., Div. Of Instrumentation, Kyoto, Japan. In each case, the measurements were performed according to the standard Kawabata Test Procedures, with four 8-inch×8-inch samples of each type of fabric being tested, and the results averaged. Care was taken to avoid folding, wrinkling, stressing, or otherwise handling the samples in a way that would deform the sample. The fabrics were tested in their as-manufactured form (i.e. they had not undergone subsequent launderings.) The die used to cut each sample was aligned with the yarns in the fabric to improve the accuracy of the measurements.
  • Shear Measurements
  • The testing equipment was set up according to the instructions in the Kawabata manual. The Kawabata shear tester (KES FB1) was allowed to warm up for at least 15 minutes before being calibrated. The tester was set up as follows:
  • Sensitivity: 2 and ×5
  • Sample width: 20 cm
  • Shear weight: 195 g
  • Tensile Rate: 0.2 mm/s
  • Elongation Sensitivity: 25 mm
  • The shear test measures the resistive forces when the fabric is given a constant tensile force and is subjected to a shear deformation in the direction perpendicular to the constant tensile force.
  • Mean Shear Stiffness (G) [gf/(cm-deg)].
  • Mean shear stiffness was measured in each of the warp and filling directions. A lower value for shear stiffness is indicative of a more supple hand.
  • Shear Hysteresis at 0.5°, 2.5° and 50°—(2HG05, 2HG25, and 2HG50, respectively) [gf/cm]—
  • A lower value indicates that the fabric recovers more completely from shear deformation. This correlates to a more supple hand.
  • Residual Shear Angle at 0.5°, 2.5°, and 5.0° (RG05, RG25, and RG50, respectively.) [degrees]
  • The lower the number, the more “return energy” required to return the fabric to its original orientation.
  • Four samples were taken in each of the warp and filling directions, averaged, and are listed below.
  • Bending Measurements
  • Bending Stiffness (B)—
  • A lower value means a fabric is less stiff.
  • Bending hysteresis at 0.5°, 1.0°, and 1.5° (2HB05, 2HB10, 2HB15)
  • Mean bending stiffness per unit width at K=0.5, 1.0 and 1.5 cm−1 [gf-cm/cm]. Bending stiffness was measured in each of the warp and filling. A lower value means the fabric recovers more completely from bending, and has a softer, more supple hand.
  • Residual Bending at 0.5°, 1.0°, and 1.5°—(RB05, RB10, RB15)
  • Residual bending curvature at K=0.5, 1.0 and 1.5 cm−1. A lower residual bending curvature indicates that a fabric is stiffer (less supple).
  • Compression Analysis
  • The testing equipment was set up according to the instructions in the Kawabata manual. The Kawabata Compression Tester (KES FB3) was allowed to warm up for at least 15 minutes before being calibrated. The tester was set up as follows:
  • Sensitivity: 2 and ×5
  • Stroke: 5 mm
  • Compression Rate: 1 mm/50 s
  • Sample Size: 20×20 cm
  • The compression test measured the resistive forces experienced by a plunger having a certain surface area as it moves alternately toward and away from a fabric sample in a direction perpendicular to the fabric. The test ultimately measures the work done in compressing the fabric (forward direction) to a preset maximum force and the work done while decompressing the fabric (reverse direction).
  • Percent compressibility at 0.5 grams (COMP05)
  • The higher the measurement, the more compressible the fabric.
  • Maximum Thickness (TMAX)—
  • Thickness [mm] at maximum pressure (nominal is 50 gf/cm2). A higher TMAX indicates a loftier fabric.
  • Minimum Thickness (TMIN)
  • Thickness at 0.5 g/sq cm. More is generally considered to be better. A higher TMIN indicates a loftier fabric.
  • Minimum Density—
  • Density at TMIN (DMIN). Less is generally considered to be better) Tmin[g/cm3]
  • Maximum Density—
  • Density at TMAX (DMAX)—Tmax[g/cm3] A lower value is generally considered to be better.
  • Thickness Change During Compression (TDIFF)—
  • Higher indicates a loftier fabric.
  • Compressional Work per Unit Area (WC)
  • Energy to compress fabric to 50 gf/cm2[gf-cm/cm2]. More is generally considered to be better.
  • Decompressional Work per Unit Area (WC′)
  • This is an indication of the resilience of the fabric. A larger number indicates more resilience (i.e. a springier hand), which is generally considered to be better.
  • Linearity of Compression—0.5 grams-(LC05)—
  • Compares compression work with the work along a hypothetical straight line from (X0, y(X0)) to (Xmax, y(Xmax)) The closer to linear, the more consistent the fabic is.
  • % Compression Resilience—(RC)
  • Higher means recovers better from compression.
  • Surface Analysis
  • The testing equipment was set up according to the instructions in the Kawabata Manual. The Kawabata Surface Tester (KES FB4) was allowed to warm up for at least 15 minutes before being calibrated. The tester was set up as follows:
  • Sensitivity 1: 2 and ×5
  • Sensitivity 2: 2 and ×5
  • Tension Weight: 480 g
  • Surface Roughness Weight: 10 g
  • Sample Size: 20×20 cm
  • The surface test measures frictional properties and geometric roughness properties of the surface of the fabric.
  • Coefficient of Friction—(MIU)
  • Mean coefficient of friction [dimensionless]. This was tested in each of the warp and filling directions. A higher value indicates that the surface consists of more fiber ends and loops, which gives the fabric a soft, fuzzy hand.
  • Mean Deviation of Coefficient of Friction (MMD)—
  • Indicates the level of consistency of the coefficient of friction.
  • Surface roughness (SMD) Mean deviation of the displacement of contactor normal to surface [microns]. Indicative of how rough the surface of the fabric is. A lower value indicates that a fabric surface has more fiber ends and loops that give a fabric a softer, more comfortable hand.
  • Tensile Analysis
  • Tensile Energy (WT)
  • was measured in each of the warp and filling directions. A lower tensile energy generally indicates the fabric has “give” to it and is more extensible, which would be expected to be indicative of greater fabric comfort.
  • Linearity of Extension (LT)—
  • Dimensionless—Indicates consistency of extension.
  • Tensile Resiliency(RT)—
  • Measured in percent. Indicates ability of fabric to recover from tensile stretch.
  • Percent Extensibility (EMT)—
  • Measured in each of the warp and filling directions. A higher number indicates a fabric has a greater stretch property. (This is a static profile.)
    TABLE A
    Tensile Warp Tensile Fill
    (LBS) (LBS)
    0 50 100 50 125
    Parameter Washes Washes Washes 0 Washes Washes Washes
    Example A 236 215 227 130 140 140
    Example B 221 204 206 131 142 146
    Example C — — — — — —
    Example D 235 213 224 166 150 159
    Example E 212 199 212 133 135 149
    Example F 231 210 209 152 139 138
    Example G 235 213 224 166 150 159
    Example H 78 78 86 40 44 66
    Example I 139 137 123 83 75 97
    Example J 87 84 77 59 59 65
    Example K 139 140 106 84 87 90
  • TABLE B
    Tear Warp Tear Fill
    (LBS) (LBS)
    0 50 125 50 125
    Parameter Washes Washes Washes 0 Washes Washes Washes
    Example A 15.4 10.6 8.9 12.7 7.2 6.5
    Example B 13.2 8.7 8.6 10.3 6.7 6.7
    Example C — — — — — —
    Example D 14.3 9.1 9.1 9.8 7.6 6.3
    Example E 13.4 9.4 10.2 8.1 7.3 6.7
    Example F 9.7 8.4 8.7 8.2 5.9 6.3
    Example G 14.3 9.1 9.1 9.8 7.6 6.3
    Example H 7.7 6.4 4.3 8.0 7.1 3.5
    Example I 8.2 4.2 4.4 7.8 4.9 4.9
    Example J 8.2 4.1 3.9 7.8 4.3 3.6
    Example K 7.3 4.4 3.6 9.2 4.7 5.1
  • TABLE C
    Pilling - 30 minutes Pilling - 60 minutes
    (Rated 1-5) (Rated 1-5)
    0 50 125 50 125
    Parameter Washes Washes Washes 0 Washes Washes Washes
    Example A 4.0 5.0 5.0 4.0 5.0 5.0
    Example B 4.0 5.0 5.0 4.0 5.0 5.0
    Example C — — — — — —
    Example D 4.3 4.8 5.0 4.3 4.8 5.0
    Example E 4.0 5.0 4.5 4.0 4.5 5.0
    Example F 4.0 5.0 5.0 4.0 5.0 5.0
    Example G 4.3 4.8 5.0 4.3 4.8 5.0
    Example H 4.5 5.0 4.0 4.5 5.0 2.5
    Example I 4.5 5.0 5.0 4.5 5.0 5.0
    Example J 4.5 4.5 5.0 4.5 4.5 4.0
    Example K 4.5 5.0 5.0 4.5 5.0 5.0
  • TABLE D
    Stoll Flat Abrasion
    (Cycles until
    Pilling - 90 minutes sample falls apart - Test
    (Rated 1-5) Maximum is 1000 cycles)
    0 50 125 50 125
    Parameter Washes Washes Washes 0 Washes Washes Washes
    Example A 4.0 5.0 5.0 1000 1000 1000
    Example B 4.0 5.0 5.0 1000 1000 1000
    Example C — — — — — —
    Example D 4.3 5.0 4.8 1000 1000 1000
    Example E 4.0 5.0 4.5 1000 1000 1000
    Example F 4.0 5.0 5.0 1000 1000 1000
    Example G 4.3 5.0 4.8 1000 1000 1000
    Example H 4.5 4.5 2.0 1000 1000 1000
    Example I 4.5 5.0 5.0 1000 1000 1000
    Example J 4.5 3.5 4.5 1000 1000 1000
    Example K 4.5 5.0 5.0 1000 1000 1000
  • TABLE E
    Seam Slippage - Warp Seam Slippage - Filling
    (LBS) (LBS)
    0 50 125 50 125
    Parameter Washes Washes Washes 0 Washes Washes Washes
    Example A 50 46.6 43.7 45 44 43.2
    Example B 58 49 50 47 47 45
    Example C — — — — — —
    Example D 48 47 45 48 47 45
    Example E 55 48 46 55 48 46
    Example F 48 45 51 48 45 51
    Example G 48 47 45 48 47 45
    Example H 48 43 42 43 43 41
    Example I 53 40 43 49 43 40
    Example J 44 38 42 47 40 43
    Example K 40 47 49 35 41 46
  • TABLE F
    Warp Stretch Fill Stretch
    (%) (%)
    0 50 125 50 125
    Parameter Washes Washes Washes 0 Washes Washes Washes
    Example A 3.80 6.30 7.50 1.25 3.80 3.80
    Example B 5.00 7.50 7.50 2.50 2.50 3.80
    Example C — — — — — —
    Example D 5.00 7.50 7.50 2.50 3.80 3.80
    Example E 7.50 7.50 7.50 3.80 3.80 3.80
    Example F 3.80 6.30 6.30 2.50 3.80 5.00
    Example G 5.00 7.50 7.50 2.50 3.80 3.80
    Example H 5.00 7.50 10.00 6.30 10.00 10.00
    Example I 6.30 7.50 7.50 5.00 7.50 10.00
    Example J 8.80 8.80 7.50 7.50 10.00 10.00
    Example K 6.00 8.80 6.30 5.00 7.50 7.50
  • TABLE G
    Fray Warp Fray Fill
    (%) (%)
    0 50 125 50 125
    Parameter Washes Washes Washes 0 Washes Washes Washes
    Example A 13.80 2.38 10.95 26.90 11.90 21.43
    Example B 4.80 2.86 2.38 9.50 8.57 10.48
    Example C — — — — — —
    Example D 19.30 3.34 14.04 4.70 4.05 14.28
    Example E 13.40 8.60 7.62 16.20 18.00 20.00
    Example F 13.80 21.43 10.95 4.70 19.52 19.05
    Example G 19.30 3.34 14.04 4.70 4.05 14.28
    Example H 23.00 4.76 15.71 17.00 13.33 7.62
    Example I 2.40 18.10 15.24 2.40 6.19 4.76
    Example J 7.10 17.14 16.67 21.40 7.62 1.48
    Example K 2.40 11.90 2.86 4.80 4.29 11.90
  • TABLE H
    Shrinkage Warp Shrinkage Filling
    (%) (%)
    50 125 0 50 125
    Parameter 0 Washes Washes Washes Washes Washes Washes
    Example A 2.1 0.0 0.5 0.6 0.3 0.5
    Example B 2.7 0.6 0.3 0.8 0.3 0.1
    Example C — — — — — —
    Example D 1.9 0.3 0.8 1.2 0.6 0.0
    Example E 1.5 0.9 1.0 0.7 0.5 0.9
    Example F 1.4 0.3 0.1 1.4 0.7 0.4
    Example G 1.9 0.3 0.8 1.2 0.6 0.0
    Example H 0.6 0.7+ 0.3 3.1 0.2+ 0.2
    Example I 0.9 0.1 0.5 0.0 0.6 0.1
    Example J 0.6 1.1 0.8 3.2 0.6 0.2
    Example K 3.7 1.0 0.2 0.0 1.0 0.5
  • TABLE I
    Appearance Crease Retention
    (Rated 1-5) (Rated 1-5)
    0 50 125 0 50 125
    Parameter Washes Washes Washes Washes Washes Washes
    Example A 3.5 4.5 4.5 4.0 5.0 5.0
    Example B 3.5 4.0 4.5 4.0 5.0 5.0
    Example C — — — — — —
    Example D 3.5 3.8 3.8 4.0 5.0 5.0
    Example E 4.0 4.0 4.5 4.0 5.0 5.0
    Example F 3.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0
    Example G 3.5 3.8 3.8 4.0 5.0 5.0
    Example H 3.0 3.5 3.5 4.0 5.0 5.0
    Example I 3.0 3.5 3.5 4.0 5.0 5.0
    Example J 3.5 3.5 3.5 4.0 5.0 5.0
    Example K 3.0 4.0 3.5 4.0 5.0 5.0
  • TABLE J
    Soil Release
    (Rated 1-5)
    Parameter 0/1 4/5 48/49 48/50 123/124 123/125
    Example A 2.5 3.5 4.5 2.5 3.5 4.5
    Example B 3.3 3.0 4.0 4.5 4.0 5.0
    Example C — — — — — —
    Example D 2.0 1.3 2.4 3.6 1.9 3.9
    Example E 1.5 2.0 3.0 3.7 2.5 3.0
    Example F 2.0 1.0 2.6 3.4 2.3 4.3
    Example G 2.0 1.3 2.4 3.6 1.9 3.9
    Example H 1.0 1.0 1.5 2.6 1.3 4.0
    Example I 1.0 1.0 1.5 3.9 1.5 4.3
    Example J 1.0 1.0 3.1 4.3 3.8 4.5
    Example K 1.0 1.0 1.6 1.8 1.0 3.5
  • TABLE K
    Vertical Wicking - 15 Drop Disappearance
    minutes (inches) (seconds)
    0 50 125 50 125
    Parameter Washes Washes Washes 0 Washes Washes Washes
    Example A 5.9 4.7 5.1 <1 sec 1.7 2.5
    Example B 6.8 4.7 4.7 <1 sec 2.0 1.7
    Example C — — — — — —
    Example D 4.6 5.3 5.8 2.2 2.7 4.4
    Example E 4.9 5.3 5.9 3.0 3.8 3.9
    Example F 5.6 6.5 6.6 5.3 4.7 4.0
    Example G 4.6 5.3 5.8 2.2 2.7 4.4
    Example H 5.1 6.4 6.4 3.1 0.4 0.8
    Example I 5.1 5.4 5.0 2.9 0.7 0.5
    Example J 5.2 6.6 6.6 1.5 0.3 0.4
    Example K 4.7 5.5 5.1 2.5 0.6 0.7
  • TABLE L
    Thickness Air Permeability
    (mm) (cfm)
    0 50 125 0 50 125
    Parameter Washes Washes Washes Washes Washes Washes
    Example A 19.40 22.32 22.01 84.4 61 58.8
    Example B 22.48 25.63 25.16 77.6 57.6 55.3
    Example C — — — — — —
    Example D 19.87 22.10 21.85 47.3 39.5 42.8
    Example E 20.78 21.33 21.88 80.6 83.4 84.6
    Example F 21.25 21.63 22.13 47.1 78.3 80.2
    Example G 19.87 22.10 21.85 47.3 39.5 42.8
    Example H 16.5 25.13 25.63 54.1 53.8 64.7
    Example I 22.33 29.19 28.88 19.6 10.6 10.9
    Example J 19.65 26.32 26.13 37.6 55.2 58.1
    Example K 23.65 29.69 30.44 26.07 10 9.84
  • TABLE M
    Flammability- After Flame Flammability- After Glow
    (seconds) (seconds)
    0 50 125 0 50 125
    Parameter Washes Washes Washes Washes Washes Washes
    Example A <1 sec <1 sec <1 sec <1 sec <1 sec <1 sec
    Example B <1 sec <1 sec <1 sec <1 sec <1 sec <1 sec
    Example C — — — — — —
    Example D <1 sec <1 sec <1 sec <1 sec <1 sec <1 sec
    Example E <1 sec <1 sec <1 sec <1 sec <1 sec <1 sec
    Example F <1 sec <1 sec <1 sec <1 sec <1 sec <1 sec
    Example G <1 sec <1 sec <1 sec <1 sec <1 sec <1 sec
    Example H <1 sec <1 sec <1 sec <1 sec <1 sec <1 sec
    Example I <1 sec <1 sec <1 sec <1 sec <1 sec <1 sec
    Example J <1 sec <1 sec <1 sec <1 sec <1 sec <1 sec
    Example K <1 sec <1 sec <1 sec <1 sec <1 sec <1 sec
  • TABLE N
    Flammability-
    Char Length Thermal Protection
    (inches) Performance (TPP)
    0 50 (calories/cubic cm)
    Parameter Washes Washes 125 Washes 0 Washes
    Example A 1.9 2.9 3.1 8.83
    Example B 2.3 3.1 2.3 9.21
    Example C — — — —
    Example D 3.8 2.3 2.4 9.19
    Example E 3.9 2.1 2.0 —
    Example F 3.6 2.3 2.8 9.25
    Example G 3.8 2.3 2.1 9.19
    Example H 3.1 1.9 2.4 7.48
    Example I 2.5 1.9 2.4 9.53
    Example J 3.2 2.9 3.8 8.90
    Example K 3.4 2.6 2.1 —
  • TABLE O
    Arc Thermal Protection Value (ATPV)
    (calories/cm2) Pyroman
    Parameter All are washed as part of test 3 seconds
    Example A 6.1 —
    Example B 6.0 28
    Example C — —
    Example D 5.7 <50R
    Example E — <50R
    Example F 5.6 <50R
    Example G 5.7 <50R
    Example H 6.0R <50R
    Example I 7.9R <50R
    Example J 7.3R <50R
    Example K 11.2R <50R

    R = recorded in the literature
  • TABLE P
    Predicted Burn
    Flame Second
    Example Exposure (sec) Degree Third Degree Total
    Example B 4.00 40.98 8.20 49.18
    Sample 1
    Example B 4.00 45.08 8.20 53.28
    Sample 2
    Example B 4.00 41.80 9.02 50.82
    Sample 3
    Average 42.62 8.47 51.09
    Example B 3.00 18.85 6.56 25.41
    Sample 1
    Example B 3.00 22.13 6.56 28.69
    Sample 2
    Example B 3.00 23.77 6.56 30.33
    Sample 3
    Average 21.59 6.56 28.14
    Example B 3.50 28.69 6.56 28.14
    Sample 1
    Example B 5.00 39.34 22.95 62.30
    Sample 1
    Example B 5.00 43.44 18.03 61.48
    Sample 2
    Example B 5.00 42.62 20.49 63.11
    Sample 3
    Average 41.80 20.49 62.29
  • TABLE Q
    Handle-O-Meter-
    Warp Handle-O-Meter-Filling
    (grams force) (grams force)
    Parameter 0 Washes 0 Washes
    Example A 33 27
    Example B 34 26
    Example C — —
    Example D 97 70
    Example E 109 79
    Example F 124 52
    Example G 97 70
    Example H 41 21
    Example I 192 182
    Example J 32 18
    Example K 209 264
  • TABLE R
    Drape Coefficient Ring Test Load
    (0-100) (lbs.)
    0 50 125 0 50 125
    Parameter Washes Washes Washes Washes Washes Washes
    Example A 33.4 26.86 26.50 72.64 59.25 72.36
    Example B 30.90 28.46 24.17 90.80 66.93 102.10
    Example C — — — — — —
    Example D 64.90 34.61 31.20 208.84 90.25 83.71
    Example E 70.60 31.08 — 249.70 83.28 —
    Example F 65.20 33.47 30.54 340.50 93.00 89.86
    Example G 64.90 34.61 31.20 208.84 80.25 83.71
    Example H 39.3 38.8 31.7 140.74 120.190 121.277
    Example I 74.0 56.5 47.3 612.90 541.826 297.478
    Example J 34.4 37.3 35.9 136.20 97.203 100.951
    Example K 80.3 53.0 51.2 862.60 352.747 392.280
  • TABLE S
    Bending Stiffness (B) Bending Stiffness (B)
    Warp Direction Filling Direction
    0 50 125 0 50 125
    Parameter Washes Washes Washes Washes Washes Washes
    Example A 0.140 0.091 0.085 0.101 0.083 0.088
    Example B 0.15 0.088 0.084 0.11 0.090 0.089
    Example C — — — — — —
    Example D 0.766 0.130 0.101 0.418 0.112 0.087
    Example E 0.723 0.120 0.112 0.371 0.085 0.073
    Example F 0.903 0.270 0.260 0.324 0.090 0.081
    Example G 0.766 0.130 0.101 0.418 0.112 0.087
    Example H 0.21 0.162 0.119 0.13 0.084 0.080
    Example I 1.04 0.359 0.337 1.06 0.214 0.214
    Example J 0.17 0.173 0.169 0.12 0.083 0.092
    Example K 1.50 0.362 0.398 1.66 0.226 0.257
  • TABLE T
    % Compressibility
    (Comp 05)
    0 50
    Parameter Washes Washes 125 Washes
    Example A 40.680 42.808 42.141
    Example B 40.126 45.044 42.182
    Example C 42.459 44.727 42.398
    Example D 33.454 40.529 38.959
    Example E 34.717 41.842 40.427
    Example F 36.736 41.994 42.182
    Example G 33.454 40.529 38.959
    Example H 40.432 39.837 34.407
    Example I 31.886 29.658 25.763
    Example J 39.871 37.860 33.236
    Example K 32.183 33.251 27.035
  • TABLE U
    Shear Stiffness (G) Shear Stiffness (G)
    Warp Filling
    0 50 125 0 50 125
    Parameter Washes Washes Washes Washes Washes Washes
    Example A 0.7770 0.658 0.592 0.6357 0.489 0.435
    Example B 0.9590 0.739 0.612 0.7833 0.583 0.490
    Example C 0.9260 0.701 0.653 0.7683 0.569 0.521
    Example D 3.4670 1.068 0.968 3.3963 1.028 0.871
    Example E 2.4437 0.692 0.633 2.2013 0.615 0.568
    Example F 2.2210 0.512 0.498 2.0490 0.470 0.403
    Example G 2.9357 1.068 0.968 2.7140 1.028 0.871
    Example H 0.7547 0.838 0.835 0.6633 0.829 0.734
    Example I 2.7373 2.763 2.575 2.6953 2.773 2.662
    Example J 0.9037 0.845 0.868 0.8197 0.772 0.757
    Example K 3.0097 2.905 3.268 2.9207 3.096 3.307
  • TABLE V
    Coefficient of Friction Coefficient of Friction
    (MIU) Warp (MIU) Filling
    0 50 125 0 50 125
    Parameter Washes Washes Washes Washes Washes Washes
    Example 0.193000 0.212 0.214 0.217667 0.222 0.227
    A
    Example 0.213667 0.217 0.216 0.224667 0.224 0.227
    B
    Example 0.209667 0.217 0.223 0.219667 0.229 0.233
    C
    Example 0.189333 0.211 0.214 0.199667 0.218 0.233
    D
    Example 0.187000 0.202 0.208 0.187000 0.225 0.227
    E
    Example 0.209667 0.199 0.210 0.221667 0.212 0.219
    F
    Example 0.185667 0.211 0.214 0.201667 0.218 0.233
    G
    Example 0.217333 0.231 0.228 0.225667 0.257 0.250
    H
    Example 0.178333 0.221 0.226 0.194667 0.246 0.242
    I
    Example 0.217000 0.231 0.247 0.233333 0.253 0.273
    J
    Example 0.177000 0.242 0.231 0.198333 0.252 0.241
    K
  • TABLE W
    WT Warp WT Filling
    Parameter 0 Washes 50 Washes 125 Washes 0 Washes 50 Washes 125 Washes
    Example A 10.521 12.639000 13.34970 5.375 7.151300 7.28630
    Example B 10.668 13.716700 13.59600 5.444 7.536700 7.66530
    Example C 11.006 13.672700 13.76430 5.578 7.473700 7.68270
    Example D 9.262 13.063700 12.90800 4.917 7.490700 7.30570
    Example E 8.198 11.222700 11.92700 5.533 6.780700 6.95670
    Example F 10.673 13.130000 13.12900 6.191 8.625300 8.51500
    Example G 10.931 12.657700 13.06700 6.012 6.696000 7.33100
    Example H 9.494 12.851700 14.12670 15.510 18.642000 20.06800
    Example I 13.509 13.933700 15.92600 13.516 16.307700 16.75200
    Example J 12.471 13.630700 14.99430 17.192 18.972700 19.43500
    Example K 14.217 14.322700 17.07100 11.616 16.035300 16.29770
  • TABLE X
    % Extensibility (EMT) % Extensibility (EMT)
    Warp Filling
    Parameter 0 Washes 50 Washes 125 Washes 0 Washes 50 Washes 125 Washes
    Example A 5.8950 8.562 8.977 2.9100 4.808 4.575
    Example B 6.2217 8.905 8.788 2.9967 4.982 4.797
    Example C 5.9317 9.125 8.725 3.3033 5.045 4.703
    Example D 5.1833 8.161 8.024 2.9167 4.455 4.553
    Example E 3.9750 7.585 7.320 3.0500 4.508 3.862
    Example F 6.0233 8.135 8.160 3.6250 5.608 5.385
    Example G 5.8650 8.161 8.024 3.1783 4.455 4.553
    Example H 6.3400 8.465 9.192 9.8617 12.215 13.150
    Example I 7.8883 8.083 8.982 6.6200 9.277 9.210
    Example J 7.3300 8.942 9.871 11.3317 12.400 12.537
    Example K 7.6650 8.323 9.702 6.0950 9.250 8.527
  • TABLE Y
    Bending Hysteresis (2HB05) Bending Hysteresis (2HB05)
    Warp Filling
    Parameter 0 Washes 50 Washes 125 Washes 0 Washes 50 Washes 125 Washes
    Example A 0.07200 0.045330 0.04067 0.06400 0.052333 0.04433
    Example B 0.07400 0.046670 0.04600 0.06967 0.045667 0.04400
    Example C 0.07133 0.047000 0.04900 0.05567 0.055333 0.03900
    Example D 0.25633 0.061670 0.05067 0.20100 0.059667 0.04500
    Example E 0.22133 0.069670 0.05800 0.13933 0.054667 0.04333
    Example F 0.28000 0.165670 0.12800 0.14500 0.052000 0.04300
    Example G 0.25667 0.078330 0.05867 0.22467 0.076333 0.05100
    Example H 0.11900 0.113330 0.09300 0.05200 0.049333 0.05200
    Example I 0.30133 0.208670 0.19967 0.22333 0.135667 0.14833
    Example J 0.10467 0.114330 0.15000 0.06200 0.051333 0.06733
    Example K 0.39700 0.244330 0.35900 0.32400 0.152333 0.19800
  • TABLE Z
    Bending Hysteresis (2HB10) Bending Hysteresis (2HB10)
    Warp Filling
    Parameter 0 Washes 50 Washes 125 Washes 0 Washes 50 Washes 125 Washes
    Example A 0.07467 0.056330 0.05033 0.06500 0.064000 0.06033
    Example B 0.08267 0.058000 0.05600 0.07400 0.059333 0.05967
    Example C 0.08067 0.058670 0.06133 0.07000 0.072000 0.01533
    Example D 0.38700 0.078330 0.06567 0.26567 0.077333 0.05800
    Example E 0.30867 0.089000 0.07633 0.18467 0.067667 0.05433
    Example F 0.39633 0.223330 0.18700 0.17433 0.067667 0.05633
    Example G 0.33067 0.098000 0.07333 026167 0.096000 0.06500
    Example H 0.11700 0.146330 0.11600 0.05967 0.058333 0.06033
    Example I 0.37533 0.295330 0.28667 0.32200 0.175667 0.18533
    Example J 0.37533 0.156330 0.17933 0.06100 0.061333 0.07767
    Example K 0.49600 0.332000 0.44800 0.44433 0.189667 0.24333
  • TABLE AA
    Bending Hysteresis (2HB15) Bending Hysteresis (2HB15)
    Warp Filling
    Parameter 0 Washes 50 Washes 125 Washes 0 Washes 50 Washes 125 Washes
    Example A 0.07567 0.067670 0.05967 0.06333 0.074333 0.07000
    Example B 0.08367 0.068670 0.06200 0.06567 0.068000 0.07400
    Example C 0.08433 0.068000 0.07167 0.08400 0.084667 0.06267
    Example D 0.40967 0.092670 0.07967 0.27933 0.099333 0.07400
    Example E 0.31733 0.110670 0.09600 0.19767 0.078667 0.06467
    Example F 0.42800 0.272670 0.24033 0.18567 0.082000 0.07067
    Example G 0.32300 0.116330 0.08800 0.25333 0.119333 0.07967
    Example H 0.11133 0.179330 0.13333 0.05133 0.070000 0.06833
    Example I 0.39967 0.381670 0.37400 0.34700 0.218333 0.22733
    Example J 0.10467 0.187330 0.19333 0.05667 0.073333 0.08333
    Example K 0.51467 0.422330 0.48267 0.48967 0.233333 0.29467
  • TABLE BB
    Residual Bending (RB05) Residual Bending (RB05)
    Warp Filling
    Parameter 0 Washes 50 Washes 125 Washes 0 Washes 50 Washes 125 Washes
    Example A 0.52267 0.499330 0.48167 0.65300 0.577000 0.50700
    Example B 0.48467 0.528670 0.55067 0.67033 0.554670 0.49233
    Example C 0.46500 0.539670 0.53133 0.42467 0.545000 0.48533
    Example D 0.28033 0.562670 0.49800 0.43867 0.556000 0.52333
    Example E 0.30667 0.590000 0.51667 0.37733 0.637670 0.59033
    Example F 0.32100 0.612670 0.49200 0.45633 0.572000 0.53333
    Example G 0.42333 0.628330 0.58600 0.60833 0.655000 0.58133
    Example H 0.57333 0.699000 0.78633 0.41467 0.587330 0.64667
    Example I 0.28500 0.582330 0.59933 0.21333 0.633000 0.69267
    Example J 0.63133 0.665000 0.88633 0.53767 0.617330 0.73233
    Example K 0.26100 0.684000 0.89667 0.19100 0.675000 0.76933
  • TABLE CC
    Residual Bending (RB10) Residual Bending (RB10)
    Warp Filling
    Parameter 0 Washes 50 Washes 125 Washes 0 Washes 50 Washes 125 Washes
    Example A 0.53933 0.621330 0.58967 0.65467 0.707000 0.68233
    Example B 0.54333 0.660330 0.66467 0.71600 0.715330 0.66367
    Example C 0.52233 0.675330 0.66500 0.52167 0.714330 0.63567
    Example D 0.42067 0.714000 0.64367 0.57767 0.720000 0.67600
    Example E 0.42767 0.748330 0.68233 0.50067 0.789670 0.74600
    Example F 0.44433 0.827670 0.71633 0.54300 0.747000 0.69767
    Example G 0.54467 0.783330 0.73167 0.70667 0.825330 0.74033
    Example H 0.56300 0.901670 0.97667 0.47300 0.692670 0.75300
    Example I 0.35800 0.824330 0.85567 0.30567 0.820330 0.86333
    Example J 0.63833 0.903000 1.05867 0.52967 0.738330 0.83967
    Example K 0.33100 0.924000 1.12200 0.26533 0.839670 0.94600
  • TABLE DD
    Residual Bending (RB15) Residual Bending (RB15)
    Warp Filling
    Parameter 0 Washes 50 Washes 125 Washes 0 Washes 50 Washes 125 Washes
    Example A 0.54700 0.747000 0.70167 0.62800 0.823000 0.79767
    Example B 0.55100 0.782000 0.74033 0.62467 0.824000 0.82500
    Example C 0.54800 0.784000 0.77767 0.62800 0.845330 0.77333
    Example D 0.44433 0.844000 0.78300 0.60500 0.925330 0.85667
    Example E 0.43867 0.923330 0.85833 0.53367 0.920670 0.88400
    Example F 0.47800 1.008000 0.92300 0.56967 0.903000 0.87533
    Example G 0.53167 0.928330 0.88167 0.68467 1.021330 0.90500
    Example H 0.53633 1.102670 1.12200 0.40333 0.826000 0.86167
    Example I 0.38467 1.064670 1.11433 0.32767 1.021000 1.05967
    Example J 0.63400 1.079000 1.13933 0.49167 0.881000 0.90800
    Example K 0.34567 1.174670 1.21867 0.29800 1.033000 1.14533
  • TABLE EE
    Maximum Thickness (Tmax) (mm) Maximum Density (DENMAX)
    Parameter 0 Washes 50 Washes 125 Washes 0 Washes 50 Washes 125 Washes
    Example A 0.536333 0.586000 0.58567 0.371000 0.367000 0.36700
    Example B 0.582333 0.666333 0.67167 0.350333 0.333000 0.32967
    Example C 0.588000 0.662000 0.64767 0.349000 0.333667 0.34000
    Example D 0.551000 0.588000 0.57867 0.381333 0.377000 0.38367
    Example E 0.555667 0.577333 0.57500 0.361000 0.351333 0.35067
    Example F 0.585667 0.582333 0.59133 0.352667 0.362000 0.35567
    Example G 0.543667 0.577667 0.56533 0.394667 0.381000 0.39200
    Example H 0.496000 0.633667 0.65533 0.462333 0.377333 0.34600
    Example I 0.604000 0.716000 0.75100 0.530000 0.465000 0.43633
    Example J 0.518333 0.690333 0.67833 0.451000 0.34433 0.34367
    Example K 0.631000 0.752667 0.79700 0.534333 0.448333 0.43000
  • TABLE FF
    Minimum Thickness Minimum Density
    (Tmin) (mm) (DENMIN)
    Parameter 0 Washes 50 Washes 125 Washes 0 Washes 50 Washes 125 Washes
    Example A 0.904330 1.025000 1.01233 0.220333 0.210000 0.21233
    Example B 0.972670 1.212670 1.16200 0.209667 0.182667 0.19067
    Example C 1.022330 1.197330 1.12367 0.201000 0.184333 0.19567
    Example D 0.794330 0.987670 0.96000 0.264667 0.224333 0.23133
    Example E 0.852000 0.992670 0.96533 0.235667 0.204667 0.20900
    Example F 0.927330 1.004330 1.02233 0.223000 0.210000 0.20600
    Example G 0.853330 0.973000 0.91500 0.251000 0.226667 0.24267
    Example H 0.833000 1.054670 0.99900 0.275000 0.227333 0.22700
    Example I 0.887670 1.018000 1.01133 0.361000 0.326667 0.32400
    Example J 0.862670 1.111000 1.01600 0.271333 0.214000 0.22933
    Example K 0.930670 1.127670 1.09167 0.362333 0.299333 0.31367
  • TABLE GG
    Compressional Work per Linearity of
    Unit Area (WC) Compression (LC 05)
    Parameter 0 Washes 50 Washes 125 Washes 0 Washes 50 Washes 125 Washes
    Example A 0.300000 0.407000 0.38300 0.32533 0.369670 0.35933
    Example B 0.385000 0.517330 0.48633 0.39733 0.379670 0.39833
    Example C 0.411000 0.510670 0.45800 0.38033 0.381670 0.38533
    Example D 0.203670 0.359330 0.33200 0.33633 0.362330 0.34967
    Example E 0.215000 0.357330 0.32633 0.29533 0.345670 0.33533
    Example F 0.282330 0.368330 0.38300 0.33233 0.347330 0.35733
    Example G 0.254670 0.386670 0.34100 0.32767 0.393000 0.39200
    Example H 0.286670 0.370000 0.33900 0.33933 0.353000 0.39667
    Example I 0.257670 0.322330 0.28767 0.36767 0.432000 0.44000
    Example J 0.299000 0.401330 0.33233 0.34933 0.382670 0.39833
    Example K 0.265670 0.362330 0.31333 0.35433 0.389670 0.42667
  • TABLE HH
    Decompressional Work Compression
    per Unit Area (WCPrime) Resilience (RC) %
    Parameter 0 Washes 50 Washes 125 Washes 0 Washes 50 Washes 125 Washes
    Example A 0.153333 0.177000 0.16300 51.2443 43.446300 42.50530
    Example B 0.209667 0.219667 0.20800 53.0833 42.429700 42.76830
    Example C 0.218000 0.223000 0.19767 54.3957 43.721000 43.21800
    Example D 0.115333 0.155667 0.14267 56.6363 43.275300 43.03830
    Example E 0.117333 0.159000 0.14233 54.5963 44.414000 43.63930
    Example F 0.137667 0.165333 0.16633 48.9260 44.944300 43.43170
    Example G 0.132333 0.159667 0.13967 51.8593 41.299000 40.81070
    Example H 0.126667 0.130333 0.12000 44.2787 35.217700 35.42070
    Example I 0.125000 0.105333 0.10333 48.4010 32.861000 35.95200
    Example J 0.129333 0.132667 0.11467 43.2660 33.014300 34.47900
    Example K 0.123333 0.122667 0.11233 46.2480 33.939000 35.80870
  • TABLE II
    Thickness Change During
    Weight (g) Compression (Tdiff) (mm)
    Parameter 0 Washes 50 Washes 125 Washes 0 Washes 50 Washes 125 Washes
    Example A 19.9167 21.508300 21.50000 0.36833 0.439000 0.42667
    Example B 20.4083 22.175000 22.15000 0.39033 0.546670 0.49033
    Example C 20.5333 22.075000 22.01670 0.43433 0.535670 0.47667
    Example D 21.0167 22.158300 22.18330 0.24333 0.400000 0.38133
    Example E 20.0667 20.283300 20.14170 0.29600 0.415330 0.39067
    Example F 20.6583 21.066700 21.02500 0.34133 0.422000 0.43167
    Example G 21.4500 22.008300 22.17500 0.30933 0.395000 0.34967
    Example H 22.9417 23.891700 22.65830 0.33733 0.422000 0.34400
    Example I 32.0333 33.266700 32.76670 0.28300 0.302330 0.26033
    Example J 23.3833 23.758300 23.30000 0.34433 0.420670 0.33800
    Example K 33.7250 33.708300 34.22500 0.30000 0.375330 0.29500
  • TABLE JJ
    Shear Hysteresis Shear Hysteresis
    (2HG05) Warp (2HG05) Filling
    0 50 125 0 50 125
    Parameter Washes Washes Washes Washes Washes Washes
    Example 1.2407 1.414670 1.21000 0.5727 0.600670 0.45330
    A
    Example 1.2983 1.562330 1.30400 0.6270 0.724670 0.59230
    B
    Example 1.4110 1.537670 1.34200 0.6723 0.715000 0.62330
    C
    Example 3.7677 1.834670 1.61933 3.2570 1.103000 0.76230
    D
    Example 1.3290 1.592670 1.48567 0.8907 0.869000 0.72970
    E
    Example 1.8803 0.777670 0.80800 1.3053 0.485330 0.44800
    F
    Example 2.8020 2.203000 2.17800 2.1960 1.340330 1.33870
    G
    Example 1.2357 2.010330 2.24200 0.8807 1.396330 1.38970
    H
    Example 2.2307 4.899670 5.02767 2.3563 4.347000 4.49430
    I
    Example 1.5200 2.195670 2.43733 1.1197 1.395670 1.46300
    J
    Example 3.2923 6.005000 7.25067 3.5930 5.752000 6.50470
    K
  • TABLE KK
    Shear Hysteresis (2HG25) Shear Hysteresis (2HG25)
    Warp Filling
    Parameter 0 Washes 50 Washes 125 Washes 0 Washes 50 Washes 125 Washes
    Example A 1.9400 1.064700 1.79367 1.2880 2.055000 0.90630
    Example B 2.2257 1.346300 1.91900 1.5510 2.280300 1.07870
    Example C 2.2390 1.299000 1.98067 1.5400 2.252700 1.19470
    Example D 7.8223 2.323300 2.60267 7.3877 3.065300 1.66030
    Example E 5.0633 1.496000 2.09100 4.4080 2.290700 1.29530
    Example F 5.3043 0.948700 1.27000 4.5470 1.275300 0.81500
    Example G 6.6990 2.630000 3.39833 5.9423 3.522000 2.57800
    Example H 1.8830 2.307000 2.98100 1.5247 2.819700 2.15000
    Example I 5.9453 8.038700 8.10300 5.8533 8.313000 7.87800
    Example J 2.3677 2.259700 3.24800 2.0150 3.041000 2.26470
    Example K 7.2243 9.493700 10.82367 7.3383 9.329000 10.35630
  • TABLE LL
    Shear Hysteresis (2HG50) Shear Hysteresis (2HG50)
    Warp Filling
    Parameter 0 Washes 50 Washes 125 Washes 0 Washes 50 Washes 125 Washes
    Example A 3.089 3.456000 3.07830 2.560 2.344300 2.00830
    Example B 3.641 3.792000 3.19170 3.029 2.831700 2.36200
    Example C 3.614 3.845700 3.35530 3.029 2.810300 2.53730
    Example D 11.349 5.678700 4.91330 10.753 5.091000 3.94800
    Example E 10.141 3.730700 3.42100 9.827 3.054000 2.67300
    Example F 11.387 2.752700 2.48570 10.804 2.388300 1.95400
    Example G 10.268 5.884300 5.90670 9.731 5.192300 5.29000
    Example H 3.021 4.163300 4.07170 2.538 3.850300 3.39070
    Example I 10.130 10.638700 10.58770 9.561 10.374000 10.31430
    Example J 3.483 4.272700 4.38070 3.275 3.603000 3.55800
    Example K 12.040 11.258300 12.62270 11.815 11.752000 12.10130
  • TABLE MM
    Residual Shear Angle (RG05) Residual Shear Angle (RG05)
    Warp Filling
    Parameter 0 Washes 50 Washes 125 Washes 0 Washes 50 Washes 125 Washes
    Example A 1.59567 2.153700 2.05033 0.90133 1.227000 1.04467
    Example B 1.35633 2.118000 2.12667 0.80100 1.243670 1.21200
    Example C 1.52500 2.197000 2.05967 0.87800 1.255670 1.19533
    Example D 1.08433 1.766000 1.87933 0.95733 1.099670 1.04733
    Example E 0.54300 2.304000 2.34333 0.40700 1.421000 1.27533
    Example F 0.86633 1.524700 1.62367 0.70667 1.033670 1.10933
    Example G 0.85833 2.105000 2.03200 0.81133 1.274000 1.32533
    Example H 1.64633 2.407300 2.68900 1.32633 1.686670 1.89500
    Example I 0.81667 1.773700 1.95267 0.87533 1.567670 1.68700
    Example J 1.69000 2.608700 2.80967 1.36700 1.812000 1.94000
    Example K 1.10700 2.067700 2.21867 1.24100 1.857330 1.96800
  • TABLE NN
    Residual Shear Angle (RG25) Residual Shear Angle (RG25)
    Warp Filling
    Parameter 0 Washes 50 Washes 125 Washes 0 Washes 50 Washes 125 Washes
    Example A 2.49667 3.127330 3.03333 2.02633 2.173330 2.08567
    Example B 2.32200 3.088330 3.13100 1.98033 2.309330 2.20200
    Example C 2.41933 3.216330 3.03933 2.00633 2.279670 2.28933
    Example D 2.25600 2.950670 3.01767 2.17667 2.316000 2.27667
    Example E 2.07300 3.311670 3.30033 2.00333 2.437000 2.26967
    Example F 2.37233 2.496330 2.55000 2.24533 2.019330 2.02133
    Example G 2.28367 3.214000 3.17067 2.19267 2.501000 2.55067
    Example H 2.49833 3.367670 3.57267 2.29667 2.784670 2.93067
    Example I 2.17433 3.009000 3.14733 2.17433 2.898670 2.95833
    Example J 2.62300 3.606670 3.74500 2.45600 2.932670 2.99867
    Example K 2.41033 3.212000 3.31233 2.52000 3.066330 3.13333
  • TABLE OO
    Residual Shear Angle (RG50) Residual Shear Angle (RG50)
    Warp Filling
    Parameter 0 Washes 50 Washes 125 Washes 0 Washes 50 Washes 125 Washes
    Example A 3.9760 5.267000 5.21770 4.0303 4.785300 4.61900
    Example B 3.7973 5.134700 5.21070 3.8673 4.859700 4.82470
    Example C 3.9040 5.488000 5.14600 3.9453 4.934000 4.86870
    Example D 3.2743 5.466300 5.69530 3.1717 5.089700 5.41270
    Example E 4.1503 5.392300 5.40700 4.4680 4.978000 4.70430
    Example F 5.1237 5.384700 4.99200 5.3377 5.084700 4.85630
    Example G 3.5250 5.367300 5.51200 3.6003 4.946000 5.23730
    Example H 4.0087 4.977000 4.87930 3.8227 4.648700 4.62200
    Example I 3.7033 3.850300 4.11200 3.5537 3.740700 3.87700
    Example J 3.8647 5.069000 5.05130 3.9990 4.672700 4.70970
    Example K 4.0127 3.876300 3.86300 4.0720 3.797300 3.66170
  • TABLE PP
    Mean Deviation of Coefficient Mean Deviation of Coefficient
    of Friction (MMD) Warp of Friction (MMD) Filling
    Parameter 0 Washes 50 Washes 125 Washes 0 Washes 50 Washes 125 Washes
    Example A 0.021333 0.026667 0.02867 0.024000 0.020667 0.02367
    Example B 0.024000 0.024000 0.02400 0.027667 0.023667 0.02500
    Example C 0.024333 0.023667 0.02433 0.025000 0.023333 0.02300
    Example D 0.039667 0.071667 0.07433 0.038667 0.032333 0.02733
    Example E 0.024333 0.019333 0.02267 0.029000 0.027000 0.02600
    Example F 0.035000 0.021667 0.02833 0.034667 0.032333 0.02767
    Example G 0.056667 0.076667 0.09700 0.038000 0.031333 0.03100
    Example H 0.014333 0.015333 0.01400 0.018333 0.021333 0.02067
    Example I 0.016000 0.012000 0.01433 0.022000 0.018333 0.01767
    Example J 0.016000 0.016333 0.01833 0.019333 0.022333 0.02500
    Example K 0.012667 0.012333 0.01133 0.022333 0.018000 0.01767
  • TABLE QQ
    Surface Roughness (SMD) Surface Roughness (SMD)
    Warp Filling
    Parameter 0 Washes 50 Washes 125 Washes 0 Washes 50 Washes 125 Washes
    Example A 12.6457 12.194700 11.75230 6.2930 6.042700 5.76130
    Example B 9.4970 9.081000 8.73870 5.8047 5.950000 6.37500
    Example C 9.9760 9.096000 9.45800 5.3733 5.618300 6.00500
    Example D 12.4050 11.195000 10.84230 7.4990 7.373300 6.21030
    Example E 12.8140 12.872000 12.50500 7.1800 7.856000 7.74670
    Example F 10.6303 10.471300 10.46900 7.6433 6.938700 7.01330
    Example G 10.6733 10.235700 10.59570 7.1230 6.476000 6.66370
    Example H 2.3677 2.738300 2.33400 4.4337 5.433000 4.86400
    Example I 2.5200 1.987300 1.98030 5.3827 4.622000 4.18800
    Example J 3.8980 2.532000 2.61830 5.0787 5.642000 4.88630
    Example K 2.5487 2.035700 1.85130 6.0113 4.168700 4.01170
  • TABLE RR
    Linearity of Extension (LT) Linearity of Extension (LT)
    Warp Filling
    Parameter 0 Washes 50 Washes 125 Washes 0 Washes 50 Washes 125 Washes
    Example A 0.705 0.580670 0.58800 0.730 0.583000 0.62600
    Example B 0.679 0.606330 0.61100 0.731 0.595330 0.63433
    Example C 0.736 0.590670 0.62233 0.666 0.583670 0.64700
    Example D 0.700 0.613330 0.61033 0.679 0.613670 0.65800
    Example E 0.813 0.584000 0.64300 0.728 0.593330 0.70500
    Example F 0.703 0.637670 0.63500 0.674 0.608330 0.62533
    Example G 0.733 0.633670 0.66667 0.753 0.647000 0.61267
    Example H 0.588 0.598670 0.60900 0.622 0.601670 0.60567
    Example I 0.672 0.682000 0.70133 0.807 0.693000 0.71867
    Example J 0.675 0.601670 0.64333 0.599 0.603000 0.61433
    Example K 0.727 0.677000 0.69700 0.748 0.685330 0.75567
  • TABLE SS
    Tensile Resiliency (RT) Tensile Resiliency (RT)
    Warp Filling
    Parameter 0 Washes 50 Washes 125 Washes 0 Washes 50 Washes 125 Washes
    Example A 51.854 49.300700 48.44500 57.483 56.347700 55.96100
    Example B 52.120 48.758000 48.70300 57.281 54.911300 54.25900
    Example C 51.531 48.273300 47.83300 57.200 53.761700 53.68600
    Example D 55.109 48.086000 49.20500 58.795 54.777000 55.18900
    Example E 52.802 49.159700 47.17600 58.120 55.645300 56.80200
    Example F 42.334 44.300700 46.11400 50.833 51.461000 51.80000
    Example G 48.799 47.513000 47.20500 58.244 54.983000 54.36800
    Example H 43.341 38.401700 39.45900 50.383 41.756300 37.85300
    Example I 42.005 36.987300 33.71800 51.343 40.68700 39.71600
    Example J 37.993 37.798300 36.32200 48.606 40.566300 37.97300
    Example K 40.292 35.886700 32.63800 57.588 42.283300 39.91200
  • In addition, the hand improvements were achieved while the strength of the fabric was maintained, and in fact, some strength measurements were improved. In addition, the fabrics of the invention had superior ATPV, lower char length, better warp fray, superior drape and bending modulus, better wicking and soil release, and better combination of comfort characteristics with a particular level of FR.
  • Stated differently, the fabrics had comfort levels approximating those of cotton, while at durability levels approximating those of fabrics made from inherently FR fabrics. Furthermore, because of the improved soil release characteristics and reduced soil retention, it is expected that the fabrics would be less likely to hold onto oily stains that might otherwise adversely impact the FR potential of the fabrics.
  • In addition, the Handle-o-meter measurements on the unwashed fabrics of the present invention are substantially better than those of the conventional fabrics, which is indicative of the superior drape (and thus perceived comfort) that they possess.
  • The fabrics of the present invention have utility in a variety of end uses, including but not limited to protective apparel, industrial work apparel (i.e. that designed to be worn in an industrial environment and laundered under industrial wash conditions), military apparel, transportation vehicle interiors (including but not limited to aviation, boat, car, bus, train, RV etc. interiors), industrial fire barriers, home and office furnishings, office panels, and virtually anywhere that FR protection would be of advantage.
  • In the specification there has been set forth a preferred embodiment of the invention, and although specific terms are employed, they are used in a generic and descriptive sense only and not for purpose of limitation, the scope of the invention being defined in the claims.

Claims (50)

1. A woven flame resistant fabric comprising a plurality of multi-ply inherently flame resistant yarns, wherein at least a portion of the individual plies of said multi-ply inherently flame resistant yarns are separated from each other.
2. A woven flame resistant fabric according to claim 1, wherein said inherently flame resistant yarns comprise fibers selected from the group consisting of meta-aramids, para-aramids, melamines, aramid fibers, fluoropolymers and copolymers thereof, chloropolymers, polybenzimidazole, polyimides, polyamideimides, partially oxidized polyacrylonitriles, novoloids, poly(p-phenylene benzobisoazoles), poly(p-phenylene benzothiazoles), polyphenylene sulfides, flame retardant viscose rayons, polyvinyl chloride homopolymers and copolymers thereof, polyetheretherketones, polyketones, polyetherimides, polylactides, melamine fibers, and combinations thereof.
3. A woven flame resistant fabric according to claim 1, wherein said yarns define a plurality of fiber tangles comprised of fibers that are substantially intact and undamaged extending outwardly from at least one surface of the fabric.
4. A woven flame resistant fabric according to claim 1, wherein said fabric is woven in a construction that is selected from the group consisting of plain weave, twill weave, basket weave, oxford weave, satin weave, and jacquard weave.
5. A woven flame resistant fabric according to claim 1, wherein said woven fabric comprises warp yarns and filling yarns, and at least a plurality of said warp yarns are spun yarns.
6. A woven flame resistant fabric according to claim 5, wherein said at least a plurality of said filling yarns are spun yarns.
7. A woven flame resistant fabric according to claim 1, wherein said fabric comprises at least about 65% inherently flame resistant yarns.
8. A woven flame resistant fabric according to claim 1, wherein said fabric consists essentially of inherently flame resistant yarns.
9. A woven flame resistant fabric according to claim 1, wherein at least a portion of the individual plies that are separated from each other comprise individual fibers that are entangled with the fibers forming another individual ply.
10. A flame resistant fabric comprising a plurality of spun yarns comprising inherently flame resistant fibers, wherein said fabric has first and second surfaces, and at least one of said surfaces comprises a plurality of fiber tangles comprised of fibers that are substantially intact and undamaged extending outwardly from said at least one surface of the fabric.
11. A fabric according to claim 10, wherein at least a plurality of said spun yarns comprise a plurality of plies, and wherein said plies are at least partially separated from each other.
12. A fabric comprising at least about 65% inherently flame resistant fibers wherein said fabric has a surface that has been chemically modified to achieve an ATPV rating of about 4 or greater.
13. The fabric according to claim 12, wherein said fabric comprises at least about 90% inherently flame resistant fibers.
14. The fabric according to claim 12, wherein said fabric has a soil release rating of about 2.5 or greater when soiled at 0 washes and tested after one wash, according to AATCC 130-1995 Test Method.
15. The fabric according to claim 12, wherein said fabric has a soil release rating of about 3.0 or greater when soiled at 0 washes and tested after 1 wash, according to AATCC 130-1995 Test Method.
16. The fabric according to claim 12, wherein said fabric has a Drop Disappearance of about 2 seconds or less.
17. The fabric according to claim 12, wherein said fabric has been chemically modified through the application of about 0.25-5% owf of ethoxylated polyamide and about 0.25-5% owf of ethoxylated polyester.
18. A woven flame resistant fabric comprising at least about 65% of inherently flame resistant fibers, wherein said fabric is defined by a plurality of interwoven warp and filling yarns, and a plurality of fibers forming said warp and filling yarns are entangled with each other to an extent sufficient to achieve a Warp Fray Value of about 10% or less when tested prior to washing.
19. The fabric according to claim 18, wherein said fabric has a warp fray of less than about 5 when tested after 125 industrial launderings.
20. The fabric according to claim 18, wherein said fabric comprises a plurality of fiber tangles comprised of fibers that are substantially intact and undamaged extending outwardly from a surface of said fabric.
21. A fabric comprising at least about 65% inherently flame resistant fabrics, wherein said fabric has a Handle-o-meter reading of about 90 grams force or less in its as-produced form.
22. The fabric according to claim 21, wherein said fabric comprises at least about 90% inherently flame resistant fibers.
23. The fabric according to claim 21, wherein said fabric comprises a woven fabric having a weight of about 2 oz/sq yd to about 12 oz/sq yd.
24. A woven fabric comprising at least about 65% inherently flame resistant fibers, wherein said fabric has a chemically modified surface and a bending modulus of about 0.6 or less when tested in a warp direction and in an as-produced form.
25. The woven fabric according to claim 24, wherein said fabric comprises at least about 90% inherently flame resistant fibers.
26. The woven fabric according to claim 24, wherein said fabric has a weight of about 2 to about 12 oz/sq yd.
27. The woven fabric according to claim 24, wherein said fabric has been chemically modified through the application of an ethoxylated polyamide and an ethoxylated polyester.
28. A woven fabric having a weight of about 4 to about 8 oz/sq yd, said fabric comprising at least about 90% inherently flame resistant fibers, wherein said fabric has a Drape Coefficient of about 60 or less.
29. The woven fabric according to claim 28, wherein said fabric has a Drape Coefficient of about 40 or less.
30. A woven fabric comprising at least about 65% inherently flame resistant fibers and a weight of about 4 to about 8 oz/sq yd, wherein said fabric has an ATPV rating of about 6 calories/cm2 or greater.
31. A woven fabric according to claim 30, wherein said fabric has been chemically treated to achieve a Vertical Wicking of about 5 inches or greater when tested in its as-produced form.
32. A fabric comprising at least about 65% inherently flame resistant fibers and having a weight of about 4 to about 8 oz/sq yd, an ATPV of about 4 or greater and a DMIN of about 0.22 or less in its as-produced form.
33. The fabric according to claim 32, wherein said fabric has a DMIN of about 0.21 or less in its as-produced form.
34. The fabric according to claim 32, wherein said fabric comprises at least about 90% inherently flame resistant fibers.
35. A fabric having a weight of about 4 to about 8 oz/sq yd and comprising at least about 90% of inherently flame resistant fibers, wherein said fabric has a WC of about 0.35 or greater.
36. The fabric according to claim 35, wherein said fabric has a plurality of fiber tangles comprised of fibers that are substantially intact and undamaged extending outwardly from at least one surface of the fabric.
37. A fabric comprising at least about 65% inherently flame resistant fibers, wherein said fabric has treatment of ethoxylated polyamide in an amount of about 0.25-5% owf and an ethoxylated polyester in an amount of about 0.25-5% owf.
38. The fabric according to claim 37, wherein said fabric has a soil release rating of about 2.5 or greater when soiled at 0 washes and tested after one wash in accordance with AATCC 130-1995 (corn oil).
39. The fabric according to claim 37, wherein said fabric is a woven fabric about 2 to about 12 oz/sq yd in weight, and said fabric has a soil release rating of about 3 or greater when soiled at 0 washes and tested after one wash in accordance with AATCC 130-1995 (corn oil.)
40. A fabric comprising at least about 65% inherently flame resistant fibers and a chemical wicking treatment, wherein said fabric has a Drop Disappearance of about 2 seconds or less when tested in an unwashed condition.
41. The fabric according to claim 40, wherein said fabric has a Drop Disappearance of about 1 second or less.
42. The fabric according to claim 40, wherein said fabric has a Drop Disappearance of about 2 seconds or less after 50 washes
43. The fabric according to claim 40, wherein said fabric has a Drop Disappearance of about 3 seconds or less after 125 washes.
44. A fabric having a weight of about 2 to about 12 oz/sq yd and at least about 65% inherently flame resistant fibers, wherein a plurality of said fibers are entangled with each other, such that said fabric has an air permeability of about 70 cfm or greater when tested according to AATCC Test Method 737-1996, and an ATPV of about 6 or greater.
45. A fabric having a weight of about 4 to about 8 oz/sq yd, said fabric comprising at least about 90% inherently FR fibers, wherein said fabric has a soil release rating of about 2.5 or greater for corn oil when tested according to AATCC Test Method 130-1995 in an unwashed condition, and a vertical wicking of about 5 inches or greater.
46. A fabric according to claim 45, wherein said fabric has a soil release rating of about 3.5 or greater for corn oil when tested according to AATCC Test Method 130-95 when soilded at 48 washes and tested after 49 washes.
47. A fabric according to claim 45, wherein said fabric comprises inherently flame resistant fibers selected from the group consisting of meta-aramids, para-aramids, melamines, aramid fibers, fluoropolymers and copolymers thereof, chloropolymers, polybenzimidazole, polyimides, polyamideimides, partially oxidized polyacrylonitriles, novoloids, poly(p-phenylene benzobisoazoles), poly(p-phenylene benzothiazoles), polyphenylene sulfides, flame retardant viscose rayons, polyvinyl chloride homopolymers and copolymers thereof, polyetheretherketones, polyketones, polyetherimides, polylactides, melamine fibers, and combinations thereof.
48-51. (canceled)
52. A fabric made by the process of claim 48.
53-54. (canceled)
US11/123,354 2002-08-08 2005-05-06 Flame resistant fabrics with improved aesthetics and comfort, and method of making same Abandoned US20050208856A1 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US11/123,354 US20050208856A1 (en) 2002-08-08 2005-05-06 Flame resistant fabrics with improved aesthetics and comfort, and method of making same

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US10/214,954 US7168140B2 (en) 2002-08-08 2002-08-08 Flame resistant fabrics with improved aesthetics and comfort, and method of making same
US11/123,354 US20050208856A1 (en) 2002-08-08 2005-05-06 Flame resistant fabrics with improved aesthetics and comfort, and method of making same

Related Parent Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US10/214,954 Division US7168140B2 (en) 2002-08-08 2002-08-08 Flame resistant fabrics with improved aesthetics and comfort, and method of making same

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US20050208856A1 true US20050208856A1 (en) 2005-09-22

Family

ID=31494751

Family Applications (2)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US10/214,954 Expired - Lifetime US7168140B2 (en) 2002-08-08 2002-08-08 Flame resistant fabrics with improved aesthetics and comfort, and method of making same
US11/123,354 Abandoned US20050208856A1 (en) 2002-08-08 2005-05-06 Flame resistant fabrics with improved aesthetics and comfort, and method of making same

Family Applications Before (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US10/214,954 Expired - Lifetime US7168140B2 (en) 2002-08-08 2002-08-08 Flame resistant fabrics with improved aesthetics and comfort, and method of making same

Country Status (8)

Country Link
US (2) US7168140B2 (en)
EP (1) EP1537265A2 (en)
CN (1) CN1688757A (en)
AU (1) AU2003251838A1 (en)
BR (1) BR0305768A (en)
IL (1) IL166776A0 (en)
MX (1) MXPA05001564A (en)
WO (1) WO2004015180A2 (en)

Cited By (8)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20080078009A1 (en) * 2006-10-02 2008-04-03 Longworth Industries, Inc. Shirt construction
US20090205101A1 (en) * 2005-05-02 2009-08-20 Vereen William C Shirt with Reinforced Front
US20110138523A1 (en) * 2009-12-14 2011-06-16 Layson Jr Hoyt M Flame, Heat and Electric Arc Protective Yarn and Fabric
US20110191949A1 (en) * 2010-02-09 2011-08-11 Underwood Joey K Flame Resistant Fabric Made From A Fiber Blend
US20130118635A1 (en) * 2009-12-14 2013-05-16 International Global Trading Usa, Inc. Flame, Heat and Electric Arc Protective Yarn and Fabric
US8793814B1 (en) * 2010-02-09 2014-08-05 International Textile Group, Inc. Flame resistant fabric made from a fiber blend
CN105109138A (en) * 2015-08-31 2015-12-02 康帝雅高档面料（苏州）有限公司 Double-layer metal melting spraying preventing fabric
US20180127903A1 (en) * 2006-03-29 2018-05-10 Chapman Thermal Products, Inc. Breathable Fire Resistant Fabrics

Families Citing this family (36)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US6867154B1 (en) * 1998-04-20 2005-03-15 Southern Mills, Inc. Patterned, flame resistant fabrics and method for making same
US7589036B2 (en) * 2002-06-07 2009-09-15 Southern Mills, Inc. Flame resistant fabrics having increased strength
US20060084337A1 (en) * 2004-10-19 2006-04-20 Southern Mills, Inc. Blended outer shell fabrics
US20090233075A1 (en) * 2002-10-01 2009-09-17 Freudenberg Nonwovens Limited Partnership Flame Blocking Liner Materials
US20040062912A1 (en) * 2002-10-01 2004-04-01 Mason Charles R. Flame blocking liner materials
US20050118919A1 (en) * 2002-10-01 2005-06-02 Eberhard Link Flame blocking liner materials
US7144600B2 (en) * 2003-02-18 2006-12-05 Milliken & Company Wax-free lubricant for use in sizing yarns, methods using same and fabrics produced therefrom
US7579047B2 (en) * 2003-05-20 2009-08-25 Milliken & Company Lubricant and soil release finish for textured yarns, methods using same and fabrics produced therefrom
US20050079783A1 (en) * 2003-10-08 2005-04-14 Campbell Paul C. Flame resistant fabrics having high resistance to pilling, and methods of making same
US20060089069A1 (en) * 2004-10-27 2006-04-27 Allen Michael B Ii Simulated rip stop fabrics
WO2009012266A2 (en) * 2007-07-17 2009-01-22 Invista Technologies S.A.R.L. Knit fabrics and base layer garments made therefrom with improved thermal protective properties
EP2402488B1 (en) * 2009-04-24 2015-07-29 The Japan Wool Textile Co., Ltd. Fireproof fabric and fireproof clothing including same
US8898821B2 (en) 2009-05-19 2014-12-02 Southern Mills, Inc. Flame resistant fabric with anisotropic properties
US20110010827A1 (en) * 2009-05-19 2011-01-20 Southern Mills, Inc. Flame Resistant Fabric With Anisotropic Properties
US9212434B2 (en) * 2009-05-22 2015-12-15 Pbi Performance Products, Inc. Blend of lyocell and flame resistant fibers for protective garments
US9499936B2 (en) 2009-09-16 2016-11-22 Mount Vernon Mills, Inc. Flame retardant, cotton/thermoset fabrics
US20110275263A1 (en) * 2010-05-10 2011-11-10 Shulong Li Flame resistant textile materials
AT511288B1 (en) * 2010-11-24 2013-01-15 Chemiefaser Lenzing Ag Flame resistant fabric for protective clothing
US9706804B1 (en) 2011-07-26 2017-07-18 Milliken & Company Flame resistant fabric having intermingled flame resistant yarns
US9386816B2 (en) 2012-02-14 2016-07-12 International Textile Group, Inc. Fire resistant garments containing a high lubricity thermal liner
CN102677301A (en) * 2012-05-29 2012-09-19 蔡紫林 Fabric
EP2767180B1 (en) * 2013-02-18 2017-01-04 W.L. Gore & Associates GmbH Flame protective fabric structure
CN103255539B (en) * 2013-04-19 2014-09-03 晋江市闽高纺织科技有限公司 Polyketone-fibre-containing stretch-proof fungi-proof lining
US20150203995A1 (en) * 2014-01-22 2015-07-23 International Textile Group, Inc. Antistatic Fabric Containing Polyetherimide Filaments
US10405594B2 (en) 2015-05-21 2019-09-10 International Textile Group, Inc. Inner lining fabric
US11028531B2 (en) 2015-11-09 2021-06-08 Milliken & Company Flame resistant and chemical protective textile material
US20170143045A1 (en) * 2015-11-25 2017-05-25 Codet Inc. Heat-resistant knitted underwear
US11077325B2 (en) * 2016-04-01 2021-08-03 Dupont Safety & Construction, Inc. Flame and particulate resistant knit article
US10973268B2 (en) 2016-08-25 2021-04-13 Nike, Inc. Garment with zoned insulation and variable air permeability
US20180251939A1 (en) * 2016-11-07 2018-09-06 Milliken & Company Textile materials containing dyed polyphenylene sulfide fibers and methods for producing the same
CN106757598B (en) * 2017-01-22 2019-08-02 吉林大学 A kind of polyether-ether-ketone spun yarn and preparation method thereof
CN111304794B (en) * 2018-12-11 2022-03-08 中蓝晨光化工研究设计院有限公司 Ultrahigh-strength yarn and spinning process thereof
WO2020168437A1 (en) 2019-02-22 2020-08-27 Jess Black Inc. Fire-resistant double-faced fabric of knitted construction
CA3171137A1 (en) 2019-03-28 2020-10-01 Southern Mills, Inc. Flame resistant fabrics
AU2022326461A1 (en) 2021-08-10 2024-02-29 Southern Mills, Inc. Flame resistant fabrics
US11761124B1 (en) 2021-09-09 2023-09-19 Milliken & Company Elastic flame-resistant fabric

Citations (25)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US2241222A (en) * 1936-09-11 1941-05-06 Sonnino Bruno Process for raising and curling the fluffs of fabrics
US4109038A (en) * 1977-03-17 1978-08-22 Teijin Limited Suede-like raised woven fabric and process for the preparation thereof
US4145467A (en) * 1975-06-06 1979-03-20 Thiokol Corporation Woven textile
US4146663A (en) * 1976-08-23 1979-03-27 Asahi Kasei Kogyo Kabushiki Kaisha Composite fabric combining entangled fabric of microfibers and knitted or woven fabric and process for producing same
US4159618A (en) * 1978-03-13 1979-07-03 Albany International Corp. Composite yarn
US4190695A (en) * 1978-11-30 1980-02-26 E. I. Du Pont De Nemours And Company Hydraulically needling fabric of continuous filament textile and staple fibers
US4303706A (en) * 1979-06-15 1981-12-01 Teijin Limited Process for the preparation of suede-like raised fabric
US4384018A (en) * 1982-01-25 1983-05-17 Wayn-Tex Inc. Secondary carpet backing fabric
US4454189A (en) * 1980-06-27 1984-06-12 Toray Industries, Inc. Sheet of polyphenylene sulfide filaments and process for producing the same
US4497095A (en) * 1978-04-13 1985-02-05 Teijin Limited Apparatus for preparing a suede-like raised woven or knitted fabric
US4499637A (en) * 1979-12-14 1985-02-19 Milliken Research Corporation Method for the production of materials having visual surface effects
US4670327A (en) * 1980-12-01 1987-06-02 Weber John W Heat resistant and protective fabric and yarn for making the same
US4750443A (en) * 1985-04-30 1988-06-14 E. I. Du Pont De Nemours And Company Fire-blocking textile fabric
US4794037A (en) * 1984-03-16 1988-12-27 Toray Industries Incorporated Flame-proof fiber product
US4920000A (en) * 1989-04-28 1990-04-24 E. I. Du Pont De Nemours And Company Blend of cotton, nylon and heat-resistant fibers
US4967456A (en) * 1987-04-23 1990-11-06 International Paper Company Apparatus and method for hydroenhancing fabric
US4995151A (en) * 1988-04-14 1991-02-26 International Paper Company Apparatus and method for hydropatterning fabric
US4996099A (en) * 1989-10-27 1991-02-26 Springs Industries, Inc. Fire-resistant fabric
US5033262A (en) * 1988-12-22 1991-07-23 Springs Industries, Inc. Method of forming a corespun yarn for fire resistant safety apparel
US5080952A (en) * 1984-09-28 1992-01-14 Milliken Research Corporation Hydraulic napping process and product
US5136761A (en) * 1987-04-23 1992-08-11 International Paper Company Apparatus and method for hydroenhancing fabric
US5142753A (en) * 1989-03-12 1992-09-01 Centre Technique Industriel Dit: Institut Textile De France Process for treating textile pieces by high pressure water jets
US5223334A (en) * 1990-05-25 1993-06-29 E. I. Du Pont De Nemours And Company Electric arc resistant lightweight fabrics
US5229184A (en) * 1988-04-14 1993-07-20 Albany International Corporation Heat shrinkable fibres and products therefrom
US5935484A (en) * 1995-08-28 1999-08-10 Milliken & Company Lubricant and soil release finish for yarns

Family Cites Families (22)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
DE3587745T2 (en) 1984-10-05 1994-05-19 Kanegafuchi Chemical Ind Flame retardant fiber mixture.
US5632072A (en) 1988-04-14 1997-05-27 International Paper Company Method for hydropatterning napped fabric
US5266331A (en) * 1991-11-27 1993-11-30 Euroceltique, S.A. Controlled release oxycodone compositions
US5337460A (en) 1993-01-21 1994-08-16 Milliken Research Corporation Method and apparatus to create an improved moire fabric
US5468545A (en) 1994-09-30 1995-11-21 Fleming; George R. Long wear life flame-retardant cotton blend fabrics
US5766746A (en) 1994-11-07 1998-06-16 Lenzing Aktiengesellschaft Flame retardant non-woven textile article
US5527597A (en) 1995-03-01 1996-06-18 Southern Mills, Inc. Stretchable flame resistant fabric
US5806155A (en) 1995-06-07 1998-09-15 International Paper Company Apparatus and method for hydraulic finishing of continuous filament fabrics
US5759207A (en) 1997-01-23 1998-06-02 Itex, Inc. Flat duck greige fabrics suitable for processing into flame resistant fabrics with low shrinkage
EP1023483B1 (en) 1997-10-01 2003-11-12 E.I. Du Pont De Nemours And Company Moisture wicking aramid fabric and method for making such fabric
JP3557883B2 (en) * 1997-12-16 2004-08-25 ブラザー工業株式会社 Method and apparatus for ejecting ink droplets
US6055711A (en) * 1998-01-27 2000-05-02 Burlington Industries, Inc. FR Polyester hospitality fabrics
DE29805867U1 (en) 1998-03-31 1999-08-26 Boco Gmbh & Co Fabrics for work clothing
DE69906334T2 (en) 1998-09-28 2004-02-12 E.I. Du Pont De Nemours And Co., Wilmington FLAME-RETARDANT FABRIC
US6565612B2 (en) 1998-09-30 2003-05-20 The Procter & Gamble Company Shrink resistant rayon fabrics
US6410140B1 (en) 1999-09-28 2002-06-25 Basf Corporation Fire resistant corespun yarn and fabric comprising same
US6770581B1 (en) * 2000-03-17 2004-08-03 Milliken & Company Absorbent fabrics, products, and methods
US6287686B1 (en) 2000-05-31 2001-09-11 Chapman Thermal Products, Inc. Fire retardant and heat resistant yarns and fabrics made therefrom
AU2001297587B2 (en) * 2000-11-08 2005-09-15 Milliken & Company Hydraulic napping of fancy weave fabrics
US7119036B2 (en) 2001-02-09 2006-10-10 E. I. Du Pont De Nemours And Company Protective apparel fabric and garment
US6787228B2 (en) 2001-05-09 2004-09-07 Glen Raven, Inc. Flame-resistant and high visibility fabric and apparel formed therefrom
DE10163548C1 (en) * 2001-12-21 2003-10-30 Freudenberg Carl Kg Flame-resistant interlining for protective clothing against thermal effects, process for its production and its use

Patent Citations (25)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US2241222A (en) * 1936-09-11 1941-05-06 Sonnino Bruno Process for raising and curling the fluffs of fabrics
US4145467A (en) * 1975-06-06 1979-03-20 Thiokol Corporation Woven textile
US4146663A (en) * 1976-08-23 1979-03-27 Asahi Kasei Kogyo Kabushiki Kaisha Composite fabric combining entangled fabric of microfibers and knitted or woven fabric and process for producing same
US4109038A (en) * 1977-03-17 1978-08-22 Teijin Limited Suede-like raised woven fabric and process for the preparation thereof
US4159618A (en) * 1978-03-13 1979-07-03 Albany International Corp. Composite yarn
US4497095A (en) * 1978-04-13 1985-02-05 Teijin Limited Apparatus for preparing a suede-like raised woven or knitted fabric
US4190695A (en) * 1978-11-30 1980-02-26 E. I. Du Pont De Nemours And Company Hydraulically needling fabric of continuous filament textile and staple fibers
US4303706A (en) * 1979-06-15 1981-12-01 Teijin Limited Process for the preparation of suede-like raised fabric
US4499637A (en) * 1979-12-14 1985-02-19 Milliken Research Corporation Method for the production of materials having visual surface effects
US4454189A (en) * 1980-06-27 1984-06-12 Toray Industries, Inc. Sheet of polyphenylene sulfide filaments and process for producing the same
US4670327A (en) * 1980-12-01 1987-06-02 Weber John W Heat resistant and protective fabric and yarn for making the same
US4384018A (en) * 1982-01-25 1983-05-17 Wayn-Tex Inc. Secondary carpet backing fabric
US4794037A (en) * 1984-03-16 1988-12-27 Toray Industries Incorporated Flame-proof fiber product
US5080952A (en) * 1984-09-28 1992-01-14 Milliken Research Corporation Hydraulic napping process and product
US4750443A (en) * 1985-04-30 1988-06-14 E. I. Du Pont De Nemours And Company Fire-blocking textile fabric
US4967456A (en) * 1987-04-23 1990-11-06 International Paper Company Apparatus and method for hydroenhancing fabric
US5136761A (en) * 1987-04-23 1992-08-11 International Paper Company Apparatus and method for hydroenhancing fabric
US4995151A (en) * 1988-04-14 1991-02-26 International Paper Company Apparatus and method for hydropatterning fabric
US5229184A (en) * 1988-04-14 1993-07-20 Albany International Corporation Heat shrinkable fibres and products therefrom
US5033262A (en) * 1988-12-22 1991-07-23 Springs Industries, Inc. Method of forming a corespun yarn for fire resistant safety apparel
US5142753A (en) * 1989-03-12 1992-09-01 Centre Technique Industriel Dit: Institut Textile De France Process for treating textile pieces by high pressure water jets
US4920000A (en) * 1989-04-28 1990-04-24 E. I. Du Pont De Nemours And Company Blend of cotton, nylon and heat-resistant fibers
US4996099A (en) * 1989-10-27 1991-02-26 Springs Industries, Inc. Fire-resistant fabric
US5223334A (en) * 1990-05-25 1993-06-29 E. I. Du Pont De Nemours And Company Electric arc resistant lightweight fabrics
US5935484A (en) * 1995-08-28 1999-08-10 Milliken & Company Lubricant and soil release finish for yarns

Cited By (12)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20090205101A1 (en) * 2005-05-02 2009-08-20 Vereen William C Shirt with Reinforced Front
US7987521B2 (en) * 2005-05-02 2011-08-02 Riverside Manufacturing Company Shirt with reinforced front
US20180127903A1 (en) * 2006-03-29 2018-05-10 Chapman Thermal Products, Inc. Breathable Fire Resistant Fabrics
US20080078009A1 (en) * 2006-10-02 2008-04-03 Longworth Industries, Inc. Shirt construction
US20110138523A1 (en) * 2009-12-14 2011-06-16 Layson Jr Hoyt M Flame, Heat and Electric Arc Protective Yarn and Fabric
US20130118635A1 (en) * 2009-12-14 2013-05-16 International Global Trading Usa, Inc. Flame, Heat and Electric Arc Protective Yarn and Fabric
US20110191949A1 (en) * 2010-02-09 2011-08-11 Underwood Joey K Flame Resistant Fabric Made From A Fiber Blend
US8209785B2 (en) * 2010-02-09 2012-07-03 International Textile Group, Inc. Flame resistant fabric made from a fiber blend
US20120278979A1 (en) * 2010-02-09 2012-11-08 International Textile Group, Inc. Flame Resistant Fabric Made From A Fiber Blend
US8528120B2 (en) * 2010-02-09 2013-09-10 International Textile Group, Inc. Flame resistant fabric made from a fiber blend
US8793814B1 (en) * 2010-02-09 2014-08-05 International Textile Group, Inc. Flame resistant fabric made from a fiber blend
CN105109138A (en) * 2015-08-31 2015-12-02 康帝雅高档面料（苏州）有限公司 Double-layer metal melting spraying preventing fabric

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
US7168140B2 (en) 2007-01-30
WO2004015180A3 (en) 2005-01-13
WO2004015180A2 (en) 2004-02-19
BR0305768A (en) 2004-11-23
AU2003251838A1 (en) 2004-02-25
EP1537265A2 (en) 2005-06-08
CN1688757A (en) 2005-10-26
US20040029473A1 (en) 2004-02-12
IL166776A0 (en) 2006-01-15
MXPA05001564A (en) 2005-04-25

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US7168140B2 (en) Flame resistant fabrics with improved aesthetics and comfort, and method of making same
EP2751319B1 (en) Article of thermal protective clothing
US20050025962A1 (en) Flame retardant fiber blends comprising flame retardant cellulosic fibers and fabrics and garments made therefrom
CN103221595A (en) Flame resistant fabric for protective clothing
CN104736750A (en) Fiber blends for wash durable thermal and comfort properties
AU2022283681B2 (en) Flame resistant fabrics
US7405170B2 (en) Stretchable fabrics comprising elastics incorporated into NYCO for use in combat uniforms
CA2088096A1 (en) Fabrics for surgical gowns and the like and methods of making same and textile products made therefrom
AU2005327468B2 (en) Stretchable fabrics comprising elastics incorporated into NYCO for use in combat uniforms
EP2740372A1 (en) Suit and method for manufacturing same
US20050079783A1 (en) Flame resistant fabrics having high resistance to pilling, and methods of making same
JP6701992B2 (en) Wrinkle resistance evaluation method
US11891731B2 (en) Flame resistant fabrics
Hunter et al. Durability of fabrics and garments
Meena et al. Fabric testing
Nandy et al. Quality Assurance in Apparel Industry.
US20040180594A1 (en) Pill-resistant sysnthetic fabric and method of making same
WO2006113351A2 (en) Durable outer shell textile fabrics
Pamuk et al. A research on the properties of various types of commonly used lining fabrics
WO2002018686A2 (en) Synthetic chamois fabrics and method of making same
Cheung The Properties and Cost of Production of Fabrics Woven from Monofilament Warps

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
STCB Information on status: application discontinuation

Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION