US20050209603A1 - Method for remediation of intervertebral disks - Google Patents
Method for remediation of intervertebral disks Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- US20050209603A1 US20050209603A1 US10/996,996 US99699604A US2005209603A1 US 20050209603 A1 US20050209603 A1 US 20050209603A1 US 99699604 A US99699604 A US 99699604A US 2005209603 A1 US2005209603 A1 US 2005209603A1
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- spinous processes
- spacer
- wing
- tether
- spinous
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Abandoned
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B17/00—Surgical instruments, devices or methods, e.g. tourniquets
- A61B17/56—Surgical instruments or methods for treatment of bones or joints; Devices specially adapted therefor
- A61B17/58—Surgical instruments or methods for treatment of bones or joints; Devices specially adapted therefor for osteosynthesis, e.g. bone plates, screws, setting implements or the like
- A61B17/68—Internal fixation devices, including fasteners and spinal fixators, even if a part thereof projects from the skin
- A61B17/70—Spinal positioners or stabilisers ; Bone stabilisers comprising fluid filler in an implant
- A61B17/7062—Devices acting on, attached to, or simulating the effect of, vertebral processes, vertebral facets or ribs ; Tools for such devices
- A61B17/7068—Devices comprising separate rigid parts, assembled in situ, to bear on each side of spinous processes; Tools therefor
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B17/00—Surgical instruments, devices or methods, e.g. tourniquets
- A61B17/56—Surgical instruments or methods for treatment of bones or joints; Devices specially adapted therefor
- A61B17/58—Surgical instruments or methods for treatment of bones or joints; Devices specially adapted therefor for osteosynthesis, e.g. bone plates, screws, setting implements or the like
- A61B17/68—Internal fixation devices, including fasteners and spinal fixators, even if a part thereof projects from the skin
- A61B17/70—Spinal positioners or stabilisers ; Bone stabilisers comprising fluid filler in an implant
- A61B17/7053—Spinal positioners or stabilisers ; Bone stabilisers comprising fluid filler in an implant with parts attached to bones or to each other by flexible wires, straps, sutures or cables
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B17/00—Surgical instruments, devices or methods, e.g. tourniquets
- A61B2017/00004—(bio)absorbable, (bio)resorbable, resorptive
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B17/00—Surgical instruments, devices or methods, e.g. tourniquets
- A61B17/02—Surgical instruments, devices or methods, e.g. tourniquets for holding wounds open; Tractors
- A61B17/025—Joint distractors
- A61B2017/0256—Joint distractors for the spine
Definitions
- This field of art of this disclosure is an interspinous process implant.
- the spinal column is a biomechanical structure composed primarily of ligaments, muscles, vertebrae and intervertebral disks.
- the biomechanical functions of the spine include: (1) support of the body, which involves the transfer of the weight and the bending movements of the head, trunk and arms to the pelvis and legs, (2) complex physiological motion between these parts, and (3) protection of the spinal cord and the nerve roots.
- spinal stenosis including, but not limited to, central canal and lateral stenosis
- facet anthropathy Spinal stenosis typically results from the thickening of the bones that make up the spinal column and is characterized by a reduction in the available space for the passage of blood vessels and nerves. Pain associated with such stenosis can be relieved by medication and/or surgery.
- the primary purpose of the intervertebral disk is as a shock absorber.
- the disk is constructed of an inner gel-like structure, the nucleus pulposus (the nucleus), and an outer rigid structure comprised of collagen fibers, the annulus fibrosus (the annulus).
- the disk At birth, the disk is 80% water, and then gradually diminishes, becoming stiff. With age, disks may degenerate, and bulge, thin, herniate, or ossify. Additionally, damage to disks may occur as a result spinal cord trauma or injury.
- FIGS. 1A-1F are a front plan view of an embodiment of an assembled the disclosed device;
- FIG. 1B is a left side view of what is shown in FIG. 1A
- FIG. 1C is a front plan view of FIG. 1A including a distraction guide, spacer, a central body and a first wing;
- FIG. 1D is a left side view of the second wing of FIG. 1A ;
- FIG. 1E is a front plan view of the second wing of FIG. 1A ;
- FIG. 1F is an end view of the spacer of FIG. 1A .
- FIG. 2 is a front plan view of a second embodiment of the disclosed device, including an end piece, a spacer, and a distraction guide.
- FIG. 3 is a front plan view of a third embodiment of the disclosed device, which is an implant system including an insertion tool comprised of a distraction guide, a central body, a stop and a handle, with a spacer around the central body.
- FIGS. 4A and 4B depict the use of the embodiment of FIG. 1A for distraction between vertebrae.
- FIG. 5 depicts a further embodiment of the apparatus of the invention based on the embodiment in FIG. 2 .
- FIG. 6 depicts a further embodiment of the appratus of the invention based on the embodiment in FIG. 1C .
- FIG. 7 depicts a further embodiment of the apparatus of the invention based on the embodiment in FIG. 1A .
- FIG. 8 depicts an embodiment of the method of the present invention.
- What is disclosed herein is a device that limits spinal extension without limiting spinal flexion. More specifically, the embodiments of the device disclosed herein act to limit extension (backward bending) of the spine without inhibiting the flexion (forward bending) of the spinal column.
- the disclosed device is made in part or entirely from bioresorbable materials.
- the device is used to distract the spinous processes of adjacent vertebrae in order to increase the volume of the spinal canal, and concomitantly relieve intervertebral load.
- the bioresorbable device may be used in procedures where temporary increase in spinal canal volume and relief of intervertebral load is indicated for remediation of an adverse spinal cord condition.
- Such distraction as a part of surgical remediation of spinal disorders may be performed either before or after the remediation procedure is performed. Remediation includes replacement or repair, or both of an affected part or parts of the spine.
- remediation of the intervertebral disk may include either disk replacement or disk repair, as well as repair of one part of the disk; the annulus for example, and replacement of another; the nucleus for example.
- a bioresorbable device is that it does not require an additional surgery for removal after temporary use.
- a bioresorbable material is a material that is broken down by natural processes, and removed thereby.
- Classes of materials that are useful as bioresorbable materials include polymers, ceramics, and glasses.
- Polymers of interest include polyesters, polyether esters, polycarbonates, polysaccharides, polyanhydrides, polyurethanes, and polyamide, including copolymers, composites, and blends thereof, as well as composites and blends with ceramics, glasses, and graphite, and the like.
- a copolymer is a polymer derived from more than one species of monomer.
- a polymer composite is a heterogeneous combination of two or more materials, wherein the constituents are not miscible, and therefore exhibit an interface between one another.
- a polymer blend is a macroscopically homogeneous mixture of two or more different species of polymer, the constituents of which are in principle separable by physical means.
- Fillers which are solid extenders, may be added to a polymer, copolymer, polymer blend, or polymer composite. Fillers are added to modify properties, such as mechanical, optical, and thermal properties.
- properties such as mechanical, optical, and thermal properties.
- bioresorbable materials it may be desirable to add a filler that would reinforce the material mechanically to enhance strength for certain uses, such as load bearing devices.
- Bioresorbable ceramics, glasses, and graphite are examples of classes of materials that are desirable for use as fillers to enhance polymer material strength. It may be desirable to add reinforcement elements to a bioresorbable polymer matrix that have the same chemical composition as the polymer matrix. In this instance, the material is referred to as self-reinforced (“SR”).
- SR self-reinforced
- Polyesters are a diverse class of polymers with a number of bioresorbable materials of interest.
- Poly ether esters are a closely related group, and due to the ester functionality, share many of the same properties of members of the polyester class. Since esters are a condensation polymer, they are easily degraded by hydrolytic processes.
- the materials of interest are also biocompatible materials, meaning that they cause no untoward effect to the host; e.g., excessive inflammation, thrombosis, and the like. Additionally, these bioresorbable polyesters are readily broken down in vivo and eventually excreted in a biocompatible fashion.
- Polyesters meeting the criteria of biocompatible, bioresorbable materials include polymers made from monomers of hydroxy acids such as the ⁇ -hydroxylactic acid, ⁇ -hydroxyglycolidic acid, ⁇ -hydroxybutyric acid, ⁇ -hydroxycaprolic acid, and ⁇ -hydroxvaleric acid. Fumaric acid and hydroxyalkanes, such as propylene glycol, butylene glycol, etc., form copolymers that are also candidate bioresorbable polyesters.
- An example of a biodegradable poly ether ester is poly(dioxanone).
- the starting materials are condensation products of the free acids, producing cyclized structures used as the monomer starting materials.
- Poly(dioxanone) is formed from the cyclized monomer, p-dioxanone.
- two molecules of hydroxy acid may be condensed to form a cyclized monomer.
- the corresponding cyclized condensation product of two lactic acid molecules is referred to commonly as a lactide.
- glycolic acid the resultant molecule is referred to commonly as a glycolide.
- the resultant polymer is a homopolymer of lactic acid.
- the resultant polymer is a homopolymer of glycolidic acid.
- the higher molecular weight hydroxy acids can undergo an internal cyclization to form lactones that may be used as starting monomers, as can the uncyclized monomer forms. Examples of these include caproic acid, which forms ⁇ caprolactone, and valeric acid, which forms ⁇ -valerolactone.
- caproic acid which forms ⁇ caprolactone
- valeric acid which forms ⁇ -valerolactone
- Stereoisomers of the lactic acid, and lactide exist.
- the properties of the copolymers formed from the stereoisomers of lactide may vary considerably.
- a 70:30 copolymer of poly-L-lactide with poly-D,L-lactide produces a material that has a degradation time of thirty-six months, while the degradation time of poly-D,L-lactide is about twelve months and that of poly-L-lactide is greater than twenty-four months.
- a 50:50 copolymer blend of glycolide with D,L lactide produces a material that degrades in about two months, while the degradation of poly-D,L-lactide and polyglycolide is about twelve months.
- Boehringer Ingelheim's extensive RESOMER® line includes a variety of medical grade poly(L-lactide), poly(D,L-lactide), poly(L-lactide-co-D,L-lactide), poly(L-lactide-co-glycolide), poly(L-lactide-co- ⁇ -caprolactone), poly(L-lactide-co-trimethylene carbonate), and poly(dioxanone) resins for fabrication of the disclosed device.
- Purac's PURASORB® line includes lactide and glycolide monomers, as well as polylactide, polyglycolide, and polylactide/glycolide copolymer resins.
- Dow's ToneTM products include high molecular weight polycaprolactone resins of high crystallinity.
- Metabolix Inc. is a supplier of a family of poly(hydroxybutryate-co-valerate) copolymer resins under the trade name Biopol.
- Polycarbonates have strength properties desirable for biocompatible, bioresorbable load bearing implants.
- the copolymerization of lactide or glycolide with trimethylene carbonate produces poly(lactide-co-trimethylene carbonate) and poly(glycolide-co-trimethylene carbonate), respectively. These copolymers have been used to make a range of products from sutures to tacks and screws.
- Tyrosine derived polycarbonates such as poly(desaminotyrosyl-tyrosine ethyl carbonate) and poly(desaminotyrosyl-tyrosine hexyl carbonate) have also been used in orthopedic applications, such as bone pins and screws.
- Boehringer Ingelheim is a bulk supplier of a poly(L-lactide-co-trimethylene carbonate) resin, RESOMER® LT 706. Additionally, Integra Life Sciences is a supplier of tyrosine polycarbonates.
- biocompatible, bioresorbable classes of polymers are polysaccharides and polyanhydrides.
- Polysaccharides are a diverse class and include glucans and glycosaminoglycans.
- Glucans are any homopolymer of glucose, and include celluloses, starches, and dextroses.
- Starch blends have properties desirable for load-bearing biocompatible, bioresorbable implants. Blends exhibiting good strength characteristics include starch/cellulose acetate blends, starch/polycaprolactone blends, as well as starch blended with copolymers of ethylene and vinyl alcohol.
- Glucosaminoglycans includes hyaluronates, dermatan sulfates, chondroitin sulfates, heparins, keratans, chitins, and chitosans.
- the glucosaminoglycans are a ubiquitous class polysaccharides occurring naturally as structural materials, and show potential for as polymers and copolymers for biocompatible, bioresorbable implants.
- Polyanhydrides are formed by the condensation of diacid molecules.
- One example of a bioresorbable polyanhydride copolymer is the condensation of sebacic acid (“SA”) with hexanedecandioic acid (“HAD”) to form poly (“SA-co-HAD”) anhydride.
- Factors that affect degradation of bioresorbable polymers include the crystalline nature of the starting material, the hydrophilic nature of the polymer backbone, whether or not the polymer has a reinforcing filler, the initial molecular weight of the polymer, the degree of porosity of the polymer material, the surface area to mass ratio of the device, and the degree of stress on the implanted device.
- Still another example of how the crystalline versus amorphous nature of a material affects degradation time comes from the previously given example of a 50:50 copolymer blend of glycolide with D,L lactide. This copolymer exhibits a highly amorphous state, and produces a material that degrades significantly faster (two months) than the degradation of poly-D,L-lactide and polyglycolide (twelve months).
- Poly-L-lactide has an increased hydrophobic nature (decreased hydrophilic nature) compared with polyglycolide, due to the methyl group in the backbone structure, and is therefore less susceptible to hydrolysis.
- the time to complete loss of strength of poly-L-lactide is greater than twelve months, while that of polyglycolide is about two months.
- the comparative degradation times for poly-L-lactide and polyglycolide are twenty-four months versus about six to twelve months, respectively.
- reinforcing filler on increasing material strength can be understood by comparing poly-L-lactide to SR poly-L-lactide properties. Time to complete loss of strength for poly-L-lactide is greater than twelve months, while for SR poly-L-lactide is about eighteen months, while the degradation times are about twenty-four months and seventy-two months, respectively.
- Other types of reinforcing fillers include ceramics, glasses, and graphite fibers. Ceramics including hydroxyapaptite and tricalcium phosphate, and blends thereof are commonly used reinforcing bioresorbable materials. Bioglasses are silicate glasses containing sodium, calcium, and phosphate as the main components.
- Ceramics, bioglasses, and bioglass/ceramic compositions have been used in numerous polymer and copolymer bioresorbable material blends to add strength to these materials.
- the bioresorption of the inorganic ceramic and glass materials follows as the dissolution of the ions, and bioresorption thereof.
- bulk properties of the material such as the porosity of material, as well as properties of the device, such as the surface area to mass ratio, affect degradation time, as well.
- time to complete loss of strength and time to complete resorption correlate to two distinct processes: (1) water penetration into the material, with initial degradation of polymer chains, referred to as the hydrolysis phase; and (2) degradation of material strength and fragmentation, and procession of enzymatic attack, phagocytosis, and metabolism. This phase is referred to as metabolism or bulk erosion.
- Increased porosity of a device and increased relative surface area to mass of a device will enhance the hydrolysis phase, and hence tend to hasten the overall degradation process.
- the implant will begin to fragment.
- Increased stress on the implant, and increased vascularization may increase the degradation time. Stress may have a role in decreasing structural integrity, and the increase in the rate of water absorption thereby, and hence affect the rate of bulk erosion.
- in vivo processes such as phagocytosis, and enzymatic activity speeding up the hydrolysis process may proceed to hasten in the bioresorption process.
- Such in vivo processes are enhanced by increased vascularization.
- the presence of the small particles, as well as a local drop in tissue pH in the case of ester hydrolysis due to increased levels of free acid induces an inflammatory response in the tissue. When bioresorption is complete, the inflammatory response subsides.
- FIG. 1A An embodiment of an implant 100 of the disclosed device is depicted in FIG. 1A .
- This implant 100 includes a first wing 104 and a spacer 150 and a lead-in tissue expander or distraction guide 110 .
- This embodiment further can include, as required, a second wing 132 .
- a central body 102 extends from the first wing 104 and is the body that connects the first wing 104 to the tissue expander or distraction guide 110 .
- the distraction guide 110 in this particular embodiment acts to distract the soft tissue and the spinous processes when the implant 100 is inserted between adjacent spinous processes.
- the distraction guide 110 has an expanding cross-section from the distal end 111 to the area where the second wing 132 is secured to the distraction guide 110 .
- the distraction guide 110 is wedge-shaped.
- the spacer 150 is elliptical shaped in cross-section.
- the spacer 150 can have other shapes such as circular, oval, ovoid, football-shaped, and rectangular-shaped with rounded comers and other shapes, and be within the spirit and scope of what is disclosed.
- spacer 150 includes a bore 152 which extends the length of spacer 150 . The spacer 150 is received over the central body 102 of the implant 100 and can rotate thereon about the central body 102 .
- the spacer 150 can have minor and major dimensions as follows: MINOR DIMENSION (116A) MAJOR DIMENSION (116 B) 6 mm 13.7 mm 8 mm 14.2 mm 10 mm 15.2 mm 12 mm 16.3 mm 14 mm 17.8 mm
- the advantage of the use of the spacer 150 as depicted in the embodiment of FIG. 1A is that the spacer 150 can be rotated and repositioned with respect to the first wing 104 , in order to more optimally position the implant 100 between spinous processes. It is to be understood that the cortical bone or the outer bone of the spinous processes is stronger at an anterior position adjacent to the vertebral bodies of the vertebra than at a posterior position distally located from the vertebral bodies. Also, biomechanically for load bearing, it is advantageous for the spacer 150 to be close to the vertebral bodies.
- the spacer 150 rotates relative to the wings, such as wing 104 , so that the spacer 150 is optimally positioned between the spinous processes, and the wing 104 is optimally positioned relative to the spinous processes. Further, the broad upper and lower surfaces of the spacer 150 helps spread the load that the spinous processes place on the spacer 150 .
- implant 100 can also include a second wing 132 ( FIG. 1E ) which fits over the distraction guide 110 and is secured by a bolt 130 ( FIG. 1A ) placed through aperture 134 provided in a tongue 136 of second wing 132 ( FIG. 1E ). The bolt 130 is received and secured in the threaded bore 112 located in distraction guide 110 .
- the first wing 104 is located adjacent to first sides of the spinous processes and the second wing 132 is located adjacent to second sides of the same spinous processes.
- the spacer 150 has a cross-section with a major dimension and a minor dimension, wherein the major dimension is greater than the minor dimension and, for example, less than about two times the minor dimension.
- Implant 200 is depicted in FIG. 2 .
- This implant is similar to the implants 100 of FIG. 1 , except that this implant does not have either first or second wings.
- Implant 200 includes a distraction guide 210 , spacer 220 which surrounds a central body just as central body 102 of implant 100 in FIG. 1 , and endpiece 230 .
- the distraction guide 210 in this preferred embodiment is cone-shaped, and is located at one end of the central body (not shown). At the other end is an endpiece 230 .
- Endpiece 230 is used to contain the other end of the spacer 220 relative to the central body. This embodiment is held together with a bolt (not shown).
- FIG. 3 depicts an implant system 300 .
- Implant system 300 includes an insertion tool 310 .
- Insertion tool 310 includes a distraction guide 320 which in a preferred embodiment is substantially cone-shaped.
- Distraction guide 320 guides the insertion of the spacer 330 and the insertion tool 360 between adjacent spinous processes.
- the insertion tool 310 further includes a central body 340 , a stop 350 , and a handle 360 .
- the distraction guide 320 at its base has dimensions which are slightly less than the internal dimensions of the spacer 330 so that the spacer can fit over the distraction guide 320 and rest against the stop 350 .
- the tool 310 with the distraction guide 320 is used to separate tissues and ligaments and to urge the spacer 330 in the space between the spinous processes. Once positioned, the distraction guide insertion tool 310 can be removed leaving the spacer 330 in place.
- the device may be secured in place via bioresorbable sutures or screws.
- the degradation times of sutures made from bioresorbable polymers are influenced by both the suture size and type of polymer.
- Suture products such as Maxon (Davis and Geck), a polyglyconate based suture material, and PDS (Ethicon), a polydioxanone based suture material, maintain tensile strength for four to six weeks, and may take up to six months to be resorbed completely.
- screws may have total time to resorption from six months to five years.
- FIGS. 4A, 4B what is shown is the view of the device 100 inserted between the spinous processes, so as to distract the two vertebrae 410 , 420 , thereby increasing the volume of the spinal canal, and concomitantly relieving the intervertebral load.
- the anterior direction is denoted “A,” and the posterior direction is denoted “P.”
- the implants described also can be used with other elements that further stabilize the spine and the implant's 100 location in the spine as it functions to increase temporarily the volume of the spinal canal and to relieve the intervertebral load.
- the implants 100 , 200 , and 300 can be used with a tether or suture which is fitted and secured around adjacent spinous processes.
- the tether or suture (these terms to be used interchangeably herein) can be made of biocompatible, bioresorbable material(s) described above and as such, the tether need not be explanted, sparing the patient from additional surgery.
- FIG. 5 A first use of a tether is depicted in FIG. 5 .
- an implant such as implant 100 or 200 can be positioned between a upper spinous process 710 and a lower spinous process 720 , and a tether 470 can loop around the upper spinous process 710 and the lower spinous process 720 .
- the tether 470 need not interact with the implant 100 , 200 , or 300 ; that is, there need not be a fastening mechanism to connect the implant 100 , 200 , or 300 with the tether 470 .
- the ends of tether 470 can be fastened together in a loop by any suitable mechanism. Alternatively, the ends can be knotted or stitched to fasten them through the bores.
- FIG. 6 A further use of the tether is depicted in FIG. 6 .
- the tether 570 fastens to an upper bore 505 of the first wing 504 , and loops around the upper spinous process 710 to be threaded through a bore 515 through the distraction guide 510 .
- the tether 570 then continues to loop around by passing around the lower spinous process 720 and fastens to a lower bore 507 in the first wing 504 .
- the tether 570 can be fastened at the upper bore 505 and lower bore 507 of the first wing 504 by an appropriate fastening means, such as a cuff made of biocompatible, bioresorbable material.
- the ends of the tether 570 fastened to the upper bore 505 and lower bore 507 can be knotted or tied off, or sewn with sutures.
- a tether also can be used in conjunction with implant 100 where implant 100 has a second wing 632 .
- the tether 670 need not pass through or connect with the second wing 632 . Instead, the tether 670 fastens with an upper bore 605 in a first wing 604 and passes around an upper spinous process 710 and can then pass through a bore 615 in the distraction guide 610 . The tether 670 then passes under the lower spinous process 720 and fastens with a lower bore 607 through the first wing 604 .
- the tether 670 can be fastened at the upper bore 605 and lower bore 607 of the first wing 604 by an appropriate fastening means, such as a cuff made of biocompatible, bioresorbable material.
- an appropriate fastening means such as a cuff made of biocompatible, bioresorbable material.
- the ends of the tether 670 fastened to the upper bore 605 and lower bore 607 can be knotted or tied off, or sewn with sutures.
- FIG. 8 is a flowchart showing an embodiment of the method of the present invention.
- load relief of the vertebral disks either before or after a disk remediation procedure is done 820 , is indicated either to assist in the process of disk remediation, or to allow for effective recovery of the surgical procedure, or both.
- the disclosed devices made in part or completely from the biocompatible, bioresorbable materials described in this disclosure, require no additional surgical procedure for removal after recovery is complete.
- the bioresorbable load relief/spinal distraction devices disclosed above can be inserted laterally.
- the implanting physician after accessing the intervertebral space 810 optionally can distract the spinous process before inserting the device 830 , 840 .
- the tissue expander can be used to distract the spinous processes while inserting the device 830 , 840 .
- the spinous processes can be further stabilized by the use of a bioresorbable tether together with the resorbable distracting device adapted to accept the tether 855 , or with a bioresorbable device which does not have wings and need not be adapted to accept the tether 850 . If the device does not have a first or second wing, the tether is looped around the spinous processes and fastened, after the implant is positioned between the spinous processes 850 .
- Certain of the bioresorbable devices are adapted to accept the tether so that the tether binds not only the spinous processes but also the implant, to maintain temporarily a minimum spacing between the spinous processes 855 .
- the adaptations include an upper bore and a lower bore on the first wing, and a bore through the distraction guide.
- the device is inserted between the spinous processes with one first of the tether attached to the upper bore of the first wing.
- a curved needle or other tool can then be used to lead the second end of the tether over an upper spinous process, through the bore in the tissue expander, under a lower spinous process, and through the lower bore of the first wing, to fasten the second end to the lower bore of the first wing.
- the tether is tightened to the desired degree to maintain a minimal distraction of the spinous processes and the ends of the tether are fastened 860 .
- the implant has a second wing
- the same method is followed as for an implant with one wing, as the second wing need not engage the tether.
Abstract
Description
- This application is related to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/230,505, filed Aug. 29, 2002, entitled “DEFLECTABLE SPACER FOR USE AS AN INTERSPINOUS PROCESS IMPLANT AND METHOD,” U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 60/421,921, filed Oct. 29, 2002, entitled “INTERSPINOUS PROCESS APPARATUS AND METHOD WITH A SELECTABLY EXPANDABLE SPACER,” and U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/684,847, filed Oct. 14, 2003, entitled “INTERSPINOUS PROCESS APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR SELECTABLY EXPANDABLE SPACER,” which are incorporated herein by reference. This application also is related to U.S. patent application Ser. No. ______ filed ______ entitled, “BIORESORBABLE INTERSPINOUS PROCESS IMPLANT FOR USE WITH INTERVERTEBRAL DISK REMEDIATION OR REPLACEMENT IMPLANTS AND PROCEDURES,” incorporated herein by reference. This application is also related to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/037,236, filed Nov. 9, 2001, entitled “INTER-SPINOUS PROCESS IMPLANT AND METHOD WITH DEFORMABLE SPACER,” which is related to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/799,215, filed Mar. 5, 2001, entitled “SPINE DISTRACTION IMPLANT,” which is related to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/473,173, filed Dec. 28, 1999, entitled “SPINE DISTRACTION IMPLANT,” now U.S. Pat. No. 6,235,030, which is related to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/179,570, filed Oct. 27, 1998, entitled “SPINE DISTRACTION IMPLANT,” now U.S. Pat. No. 6,048,342, which is related to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/474,037, filed Dec. 28, 1999, entitled “SPINE DISTRACTION IMPLANT,” now U.S. Pat. No. 6,190,387, which is related to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/175,645, filed Oct. 20, 1998, entitled “SPINE DISTRACTION IMPLANT,” now U.S. Pat. No. 6,068,630, and U.S. application Ser. No. 10/694,103, filed Oct. 27, 2003, entitled “INTERSPINOUS PROCESS IMPLANT WITH RADIOLUCENT SPACER AND LEAD-IN TISSUE EXPANDER.” All of the above are incorporated herein by reference. This application is also related to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/684,669, filed Oct. 14, 2003, entitled “ARTIFICIAL VERTEBRAL DISK REPLACEMENT IMPLANT WITH TRANSLATING PIVOT POINT AND METHOD,” U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60/526,724, filed Dec. 2, 2003, entitled “ARTIFICIAL VERTEBRAL DISK REPLACEMENT IMPLANT WITH TRANSLATING PIVOT POINT AND LATERAL IMPLANT METHOD,” U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/684,668, filed Oct. 14, 2003, entitled “ARTIFICIAL VERTEBRAL DISK REPLACEMENT IMPLANT WITH CROSSBAR SPACER AND METHOD,” U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 60/517,973, filed Nov. 6, 2003, entitled “ARTIFICIAL VERTEBRAL DISK REPLACEMENT IMPLANT WITH CROSSBAR SPACER AND LATERAL IMPLANT METHOD,” U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/685,011, filed Oct. 14, 2003, entitled “ARTIFICIAL VERTEBRAL DISK REPLACEMENT IMPLANT WITH A SPACER AND METHOD,” and U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 60/524,350 filed Nov. 21, 2003, entitled “ARTIFICIAL VERTEBRAL DISK REPLACEMENT IMPLANT WITH A SPACER AND LATERAL IMPLANT METHOD,” all of which are also incorporated herein by reference.
- U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60/526,215 entitled: METHOD FOR REMEDIATION OF INTERVERTEBRAL DISKS, by Zucherman et al., filed Dec. 2, 2003 (Attorney Docket No. KLYCD-01082US0), and U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60/526,353 entitled BIORESORBABLE INTERSPINOUS PROCESS IMPLANT FOR USE WITH INTERVERTEBRAL DISK REMEDIATION OR REPLACEMENT IMPLANTS AND PROCEDURES, by James F. Zucherman et al., filed Dec. 2, 2003 (Attorney Docket No. KLYCD-01082US 1) both which are incorporated herein by reference.
- This field of art of this disclosure is an interspinous process implant.
- The spinal column is a biomechanical structure composed primarily of ligaments, muscles, vertebrae and intervertebral disks. The biomechanical functions of the spine include: (1) support of the body, which involves the transfer of the weight and the bending movements of the head, trunk and arms to the pelvis and legs, (2) complex physiological motion between these parts, and (3) protection of the spinal cord and the nerve roots.
- As the present society ages, it is anticipated that there will be an increase in adverse spinal conditions which are characteristic of older people. By way of example, with aging comes an increase in spinal stenosis (including, but not limited to, central canal and lateral stenosis), and facet anthropathy. Spinal stenosis typically results from the thickening of the bones that make up the spinal column and is characterized by a reduction in the available space for the passage of blood vessels and nerves. Pain associated with such stenosis can be relieved by medication and/or surgery.
- In addition, to spinal stenosis, and facet anthropathy, the incidence of damage to the intervertebral disks due to injury or degeneration is also common. The primary purpose of the intervertebral disk is as a shock absorber. The disk is constructed of an inner gel-like structure, the nucleus pulposus (the nucleus), and an outer rigid structure comprised of collagen fibers, the annulus fibrosus (the annulus). At birth, the disk is 80% water, and then gradually diminishes, becoming stiff. With age, disks may degenerate, and bulge, thin, herniate, or ossify. Additionally, damage to disks may occur as a result spinal cord trauma or injury.
- Given an increasing need, there is increasing attention currently focused on devices and methods for remediation of conditions of the spine. Remediation includes replacement or repair, or both of an affected part or parts of the spine, as will be discussed in more detail subsequently. Regarding the evolution of remediation of damage to intervertebral disks, rigid fixation procedures resulting in fusion are still the most commonly performed, though trends suggest a move away from such procedures. Currently, areas evolving to address the shortcomings of fusion for remediation of disk damage include technologies and procedures that preserve or repair the annulus, that replace or repair the nucleus, and that utilize technology advancement on devices for total disk replacement. The trend away from fusion is driven by both issues concerning the quality of life for those suffering from damaged intervertebral disks, as well as responsible health care management. These issues drive the desire for procedures that are minimally invasive, can be tolerated by patients of all ages, especially seniors, and can be performed preferably on an out patient basis.
- Accordingly, there is a need in the art for innovation in technologies and methods that advance the art in the area of minimally invasive intervertebral disk remediation, thereby enhancing the quality of life for those suffering from the condition, as well as responding to the current needs of health care management.
-
FIGS. 1A-1F .FIG. 1A is a front plan view of an embodiment of an assembled the disclosed device;FIG. 1B is a left side view of what is shown inFIG. 1A , andFIG. 1C is a front plan view ofFIG. 1A including a distraction guide, spacer, a central body and a first wing;FIG. 1D is a left side view of the second wing ofFIG. 1A ;FIG. 1E is a front plan view of the second wing ofFIG. 1A ;FIG. 1F is an end view of the spacer ofFIG. 1A . -
FIG. 2 is a front plan view of a second embodiment of the disclosed device, including an end piece, a spacer, and a distraction guide. -
FIG. 3 is a front plan view of a third embodiment of the disclosed device, which is an implant system including an insertion tool comprised of a distraction guide, a central body, a stop and a handle, with a spacer around the central body. -
FIGS. 4A and 4B depict the use of the embodiment ofFIG. 1A for distraction between vertebrae. -
FIG. 5 depicts a further embodiment of the apparatus of the invention based on the embodiment inFIG. 2 . -
FIG. 6 depicts a further embodiment of the appratus of the invention based on the embodiment inFIG. 1C . -
FIG. 7 depicts a further embodiment of the apparatus of the invention based on the embodiment inFIG. 1A . -
FIG. 8 depicts an embodiment of the method of the present invention. - What is disclosed herein is a device that limits spinal extension without limiting spinal flexion. More specifically, the embodiments of the device disclosed herein act to limit extension (backward bending) of the spine without inhibiting the flexion (forward bending) of the spinal column.
- The disclosed device is made in part or entirely from bioresorbable materials. The device is used to distract the spinous processes of adjacent vertebrae in order to increase the volume of the spinal canal, and concomitantly relieve intervertebral load. In this regard, the bioresorbable device may be used in procedures where temporary increase in spinal canal volume and relief of intervertebral load is indicated for remediation of an adverse spinal cord condition. Such distraction as a part of surgical remediation of spinal disorders may be performed either before or after the remediation procedure is performed. Remediation includes replacement or repair, or both of an affected part or parts of the spine. For example, remediation of the intervertebral disk may include either disk replacement or disk repair, as well as repair of one part of the disk; the annulus for example, and replacement of another; the nucleus for example. One feature of a bioresorbable device is that it does not require an additional surgery for removal after temporary use.
- A bioresorbable material is a material that is broken down by natural processes, and removed thereby. Classes of materials that are useful as bioresorbable materials include polymers, ceramics, and glasses. Polymers of interest include polyesters, polyether esters, polycarbonates, polysaccharides, polyanhydrides, polyurethanes, and polyamide, including copolymers, composites, and blends thereof, as well as composites and blends with ceramics, glasses, and graphite, and the like. A copolymer is a polymer derived from more than one species of monomer. A polymer composite is a heterogeneous combination of two or more materials, wherein the constituents are not miscible, and therefore exhibit an interface between one another. A polymer blend is a macroscopically homogeneous mixture of two or more different species of polymer, the constituents of which are in principle separable by physical means. Fillers, which are solid extenders, may be added to a polymer, copolymer, polymer blend, or polymer composite. Fillers are added to modify properties, such as mechanical, optical, and thermal properties. For bioresorbable materials, it may be desirable to add a filler that would reinforce the material mechanically to enhance strength for certain uses, such as load bearing devices. Bioresorbable ceramics, glasses, and graphite are examples of classes of materials that are desirable for use as fillers to enhance polymer material strength. It may be desirable to add reinforcement elements to a bioresorbable polymer matrix that have the same chemical composition as the polymer matrix. In this instance, the material is referred to as self-reinforced (“SR”).
- Polyesters are a diverse class of polymers with a number of bioresorbable materials of interest. Poly ether esters are a closely related group, and due to the ester functionality, share many of the same properties of members of the polyester class. Since esters are a condensation polymer, they are easily degraded by hydrolytic processes. Moreover, the materials of interest are also biocompatible materials, meaning that they cause no untoward effect to the host; e.g., excessive inflammation, thrombosis, and the like. Additionally, these bioresorbable polyesters are readily broken down in vivo and eventually excreted in a biocompatible fashion.
- Polyesters meeting the criteria of biocompatible, bioresorbable materials include polymers made from monomers of hydroxy acids such as the α-hydroxylactic acid, α-hydroxyglycolidic acid, β-hydroxybutyric acid, γ-hydroxycaprolic acid, and δ-hydroxvaleric acid. Fumaric acid and hydroxyalkanes, such as propylene glycol, butylene glycol, etc., form copolymers that are also candidate bioresorbable polyesters. An example of a biodegradable poly ether ester is poly(dioxanone).
- Frequently, the starting materials are condensation products of the free acids, producing cyclized structures used as the monomer starting materials. Poly(dioxanone) is formed from the cyclized monomer, p-dioxanone. For the lower molecular weight hydroxy acids, two molecules of hydroxy acid may be condensed to form a cyclized monomer. In the case of lactic acid, the corresponding cyclized condensation product of two lactic acid molecules is referred to commonly as a lactide. In the case of glycolic acid, the resultant molecule is referred to commonly as a glycolide. In this regard, whether one starts with lactic acid, or forms thereof, or with lactide, the resultant polymer is a homopolymer of lactic acid. Similarly, in the case of glycolic acid, or forms thereof, and glycolide, regardless of the starting monomer, the resultant polymer is a homopolymer of glycolidic acid. The higher molecular weight hydroxy acids can undergo an internal cyclization to form lactones that may be used as starting monomers, as can the uncyclized monomer forms. Examples of these include caproic acid, which forms εcaprolactone, and valeric acid, which forms δ-valerolactone. Again, whether the cyclized monomer, or the free acid monomer, or forms thereof are used as starting materials, homopolymers of the corresponding acids will result. In terms of the common nomenclature for designating these polymers, either form of the starting material may be used to refer to the polymer formed thereby. Hence, reference to polylactide is equivalent to polylactate, since both are homopolymers of lactic acid.
- Stereoisomers of the lactic acid, and lactide exist. The properties of the copolymers formed from the stereoisomers of lactide may vary considerably. Interestingly, there is no linear relationship between properties of homopolymers, and their corresponding copolymers. In that regard, a 70:30 copolymer of poly-L-lactide with poly-D,L-lactide produces a material that has a degradation time of thirty-six months, while the degradation time of poly-D,L-lactide is about twelve months and that of poly-L-lactide is greater than twenty-four months. As another example, a 50:50 copolymer blend of glycolide with D,L lactide produces a material that degrades in about two months, while the degradation of poly-D,L-lactide and polyglycolide is about twelve months.
- Major suppliers of bulk biodegradable polyester materials include Boehringer Ingelheim, Purac, and Dow. Boehringer Ingelheim's extensive RESOMER® line includes a variety of medical grade poly(L-lactide), poly(D,L-lactide), poly(L-lactide-co-D,L-lactide), poly(L-lactide-co-glycolide), poly(L-lactide-co-ε-caprolactone), poly(L-lactide-co-trimethylene carbonate), and poly(dioxanone) resins for fabrication of the disclosed device. Similarly, Purac's PURASORB® line includes lactide and glycolide monomers, as well as polylactide, polyglycolide, and polylactide/glycolide copolymer resins. Dow's Tone™ products include high molecular weight polycaprolactone resins of high crystallinity. Metabolix Inc. is a supplier of a family of poly(hydroxybutryate-co-valerate) copolymer resins under the trade name Biopol.
- Polycarbonates have strength properties desirable for biocompatible, bioresorbable load bearing implants. The copolymerization of lactide or glycolide with trimethylene carbonate produces poly(lactide-co-trimethylene carbonate) and poly(glycolide-co-trimethylene carbonate), respectively. These copolymers have been used to make a range of products from sutures to tacks and screws. Tyrosine derived polycarbonates such as poly(desaminotyrosyl-tyrosine ethyl carbonate) and poly(desaminotyrosyl-tyrosine hexyl carbonate) have also been used in orthopedic applications, such as bone pins and screws. As mentioned above, Boehringer Ingelheim is a bulk supplier of a poly(L-lactide-co-trimethylene carbonate) resin, RESOMER® LT 706. Additionally, Integra Life Sciences is a supplier of tyrosine polycarbonates.
- Other examples of biocompatible, bioresorbable classes of polymers are polysaccharides and polyanhydrides. Polysaccharides are a diverse class and include glucans and glycosaminoglycans. Glucans are any homopolymer of glucose, and include celluloses, starches, and dextroses. Starch blends have properties desirable for load-bearing biocompatible, bioresorbable implants. Blends exhibiting good strength characteristics include starch/cellulose acetate blends, starch/polycaprolactone blends, as well as starch blended with copolymers of ethylene and vinyl alcohol. Glucosaminoglycans includes hyaluronates, dermatan sulfates, chondroitin sulfates, heparins, keratans, chitins, and chitosans. The glucosaminoglycans are a ubiquitous class polysaccharides occurring naturally as structural materials, and show potential for as polymers and copolymers for biocompatible, bioresorbable implants. Polyanhydrides are formed by the condensation of diacid molecules. One example of a bioresorbable polyanhydride copolymer is the condensation of sebacic acid (“SA”) with hexanedecandioic acid (“HAD”) to form poly (“SA-co-HAD”) anhydride.
- It should be noted that there are two important phases of the process of bioresorption: time to complete loss of strength of the material, and time to complete resorption. There are several factors that affect the rate of degradation of bioresorbable materials, and hence both the time to complete loss of strength, and time to complete resorption. In general, reduction in strength follows the reduction in molecular weight of a polymeric material as it degrades. Factors that affect degradation of bioresorbable polymers include the crystalline nature of the starting material, the hydrophilic nature of the polymer backbone, whether or not the polymer has a reinforcing filler, the initial molecular weight of the polymer, the degree of porosity of the polymer material, the surface area to mass ratio of the device, and the degree of stress on the implanted device.
- An example of how the crystalline vs. amorphous nature of the starting material impact degradation is illustrated in the comparing the properties of poly-L-lactide vs. poly-D,L-lactide. The time to complete loss of strength of poly-D,L-lactide is about 6 months, while that of poly-L-lactide is more than 12 months. Recalling from the above, poly-D,L-lactide degrades more rapidly (12 months) than poly-L-lactide (24 months). The racemic mixture of the stereoisomer produces significantly amorphous powders, which yield lower strength materials degrading more rapidly than polymers made from their highly crystalline counter part. Still another example of how the crystalline versus amorphous nature of a material affects degradation time comes from the previously given example of a 50:50 copolymer blend of glycolide with D,L lactide. This copolymer exhibits a highly amorphous state, and produces a material that degrades significantly faster (two months) than the degradation of poly-D,L-lactide and polyglycolide (twelve months).
- Concerning the hydrophilic nature of the polymer backbone, an example of how this property impacts degradation is demonstrated through the comparison of the stability of poly-L-lactide against polyglycolide. Poly-L-lactide has an increased hydrophobic nature (decreased hydrophilic nature) compared with polyglycolide, due to the methyl group in the backbone structure, and is therefore less susceptible to hydrolysis. The time to complete loss of strength of poly-L-lactide is greater than twelve months, while that of polyglycolide is about two months. The comparative degradation times for poly-L-lactide and polyglycolide are twenty-four months versus about six to twelve months, respectively.
- The impact of reinforcing filler on increasing material strength can be understood by comparing poly-L-lactide to SR poly-L-lactide properties. Time to complete loss of strength for poly-L-lactide is greater than twelve months, while for SR poly-L-lactide is about eighteen months, while the degradation times are about twenty-four months and seventy-two months, respectively. Other types of reinforcing fillers include ceramics, glasses, and graphite fibers. Ceramics including hydroxyapaptite and tricalcium phosphate, and blends thereof are commonly used reinforcing bioresorbable materials. Bioglasses are silicate glasses containing sodium, calcium, and phosphate as the main components. Ceramics, bioglasses, and bioglass/ceramic compositions have been used in numerous polymer and copolymer bioresorbable material blends to add strength to these materials. The bioresorption of the inorganic ceramic and glass materials follows as the dissolution of the ions, and bioresorption thereof.
- In addition to the molecular properties influencing material properties that impact degradation, bulk properties of the material, such as the porosity of material, as well as properties of the device, such as the surface area to mass ratio, affect degradation time, as well. As previously mentioned, there are two phases to the degradation process: time to complete loss of strength and time to complete resorption. These two phases of degradation correlate to two distinct processes: (1) water penetration into the material, with initial degradation of polymer chains, referred to as the hydrolysis phase; and (2) degradation of material strength and fragmentation, and procession of enzymatic attack, phagocytosis, and metabolism. This phase is referred to as metabolism or bulk erosion. Increased porosity of a device and increased relative surface area to mass of a device will enhance the hydrolysis phase, and hence tend to hasten the overall degradation process.
- Regarding the impact of degradative processes on the site of the implant, as loss of strength proceeds, the implant will begin to fragment. Increased stress on the implant, and increased vascularization may increase the degradation time. Stress may have a role in decreasing structural integrity, and the increase in the rate of water absorption thereby, and hence affect the rate of bulk erosion. Once the polymer has fragmented into small pieces, in vivo processes, such as phagocytosis, and enzymatic activity speeding up the hydrolysis process may proceed to hasten in the bioresorption process. Such in vivo processes are enhanced by increased vascularization. The presence of the small particles, as well as a local drop in tissue pH in the case of ester hydrolysis due to increased levels of free acid, induces an inflammatory response in the tissue. When bioresorption is complete, the inflammatory response subsides. In that regard, it may be desirable, depending on the use of the device, to fabricate devices from polymers that take longer to complete loss of strength, and have slower rates of degradation.
- By what is disclosed of molecular properties, bulk material properties, device design, and factors at the site of implantation, it is therefore possible to design devices from selected materials accordingly.
- The following description is presented to enable any person skilled in the art to make and use the disclosed device. Various modifications to the embodiments described will be readily apparent to those skilled in the art, and the principles defined herein can be applied to other embodiments and applications without departing from the spirit and scope of the present disclosure as defined by the appended claims. Thus, the present disclosure is not intended to be limited to the embodiments shown, but is to be accorded the widest scope consistent with the principles and features disclosed herein.
- An embodiment of an
implant 100 of the disclosed device is depicted inFIG. 1A . Thisimplant 100 includes afirst wing 104 and aspacer 150 and a lead-in tissue expander ordistraction guide 110. This embodiment further can include, as required, asecond wing 132. As can be seen inFIG. 1A , acentral body 102 extends from thefirst wing 104 and is the body that connects thefirst wing 104 to the tissue expander ordistraction guide 110. Also, as can be seen inFIG. 1A and 1B , thedistraction guide 110 in this particular embodiment acts to distract the soft tissue and the spinous processes when theimplant 100 is inserted between adjacent spinous processes. In this particular embodiment, thedistraction guide 110 has an expanding cross-section from thedistal end 111 to the area where thesecond wing 132 is secured to thedistraction guide 110. In this embodiment thedistraction guide 110 is wedge-shaped. - Additionally, as can be seen in
FIGS. 1A , and 1F, thespacer 150 is elliptical shaped in cross-section. Thespacer 150 can have other shapes such as circular, oval, ovoid, football-shaped, and rectangular-shaped with rounded comers and other shapes, and be within the spirit and scope of what is disclosed. In this embodiment,spacer 150 includes abore 152 which extends the length ofspacer 150. Thespacer 150 is received over thecentral body 102 of theimplant 100 and can rotate thereon about thecentral body 102. In these embodiments, thespacer 150 can have minor and major dimensions as follows:MINOR DIMENSION (116A) MAJOR DIMENSION (116 B) 6 mm 13.7 mm 8 mm 14.2 mm 10 mm 15.2 mm 12 mm 16.3 mm 14 mm 17.8 mm - The advantage of the use of the
spacer 150 as depicted in the embodiment ofFIG. 1A is that thespacer 150 can be rotated and repositioned with respect to thefirst wing 104, in order to more optimally position theimplant 100 between spinous processes. It is to be understood that the cortical bone or the outer bone of the spinous processes is stronger at an anterior position adjacent to the vertebral bodies of the vertebra than at a posterior position distally located from the vertebral bodies. Also, biomechanically for load bearing, it is advantageous for thespacer 150 to be close to the vertebral bodies. In order to facilitate this and to accommodate the anatomical form of the bone structures, as the implant is inserted between the spinous processes and/or urged toward the vertebral bodies, thespacer 150 rotates relative to the wings, such aswing 104, so that thespacer 150 is optimally positioned between the spinous processes, and thewing 104 is optimally positioned relative to the spinous processes. Further, the broad upper and lower surfaces of thespacer 150 helps spread the load that the spinous processes place on thespacer 150. - As may be required for positioning the
implant 100 between the spinous processes,implant 100 can also include a second wing 132 (FIG. 1E ) which fits over thedistraction guide 110 and is secured by a bolt 130 (FIG. 1A ) placed throughaperture 134 provided in atongue 136 of second wing 132 (FIG. 1E ). Thebolt 130 is received and secured in the threaded bore 112 located indistraction guide 110. As implanted, thefirst wing 104 is located adjacent to first sides of the spinous processes and thesecond wing 132 is located adjacent to second sides of the same spinous processes. - In another embodiment, the
spacer 150 has a cross-section with a major dimension and a minor dimension, wherein the major dimension is greater than the minor dimension and, for example, less than about two times the minor dimension. -
Implant 200 is depicted inFIG. 2 . This implant is similar to theimplants 100 ofFIG. 1 , except that this implant does not have either first or second wings.Implant 200 includes adistraction guide 210,spacer 220 which surrounds a central body just ascentral body 102 ofimplant 100 inFIG. 1 , andendpiece 230. Thedistraction guide 210 in this preferred embodiment is cone-shaped, and is located at one end of the central body (not shown). At the other end is anendpiece 230.Endpiece 230 is used to contain the other end of thespacer 220 relative to the central body. This embodiment is held together with a bolt (not shown). -
FIG. 3 depicts animplant system 300.Implant system 300 includes aninsertion tool 310.Insertion tool 310 includes adistraction guide 320 which in a preferred embodiment is substantially cone-shaped.Distraction guide 320 guides the insertion of thespacer 330 and theinsertion tool 360 between adjacent spinous processes. Theinsertion tool 310 further includes acentral body 340, astop 350, and ahandle 360. Thedistraction guide 320 at its base has dimensions which are slightly less than the internal dimensions of thespacer 330 so that the spacer can fit over thedistraction guide 320 and rest against thestop 350. Thetool 310 with thedistraction guide 320 is used to separate tissues and ligaments and to urge thespacer 330 in the space between the spinous processes. Once positioned, the distractionguide insertion tool 310 can be removed leaving thespacer 330 in place. - For the
implants 200 ofFIG. 2 and 300 ofFIG. 3 , such devices would be appropriate where the anatomy between the spinous processes was such that it would be undesirable to use either a first or second wing. However, these embodiment afford all the advantageous described hereinabove (FIGS. 1A-1F ) with respect to the distraction guide and also with respect to the dynamics of the spacer. - Additionally, for the embodiments shown in
FIGS. 2 and 3 , the device may be secured in place via bioresorbable sutures or screws. The degradation times of sutures made from bioresorbable polymers are influenced by both the suture size and type of polymer. Suture products such as Maxon (Davis and Geck), a polyglyconate based suture material, and PDS (Ethicon), a polydioxanone based suture material, maintain tensile strength for four to six weeks, and may take up to six months to be resorbed completely. Depending on the material used, as detailed above, screws may have total time to resorption from six months to five years. Biologically Quite (Instrument Makar), a poly(D,L-lactide-co-glycolide) screw degrades in about six months, while Phusiline (Phusis), a poly(L-lactide-co-D,L lactide) copolymer degrades in about five years, and Bioscrew (Linvatec), a ploy(L-lactide) screw degrades in the range of two to three years. - In
FIGS. 4A, 4B , what is shown is the view of thedevice 100 inserted between the spinous processes, so as to distract the twovertebrae - The implants described also can be used with other elements that further stabilize the spine and the implant's 100 location in the spine as it functions to increase temporarily the volume of the spinal canal and to relieve the intervertebral load. For example, the
implants - A first use of a tether is depicted in
FIG. 5 . In thisembodiment 400, an implant such asimplant spinous process 710 and a lowerspinous process 720, and a tether 470 can loop around the upperspinous process 710 and the lowerspinous process 720. The tether 470 need not interact with theimplant implant - A further use of the tether is depicted in
FIG. 6 . In this embodiment 500, based uponimplant 100, the tether 570 fastens to an upper bore 505 of thefirst wing 504, and loops around the upperspinous process 710 to be threaded through abore 515 through thedistraction guide 510. The tether 570 then continues to loop around by passing around the lowerspinous process 720 and fastens to alower bore 507 in thefirst wing 504. The tether 570 can be fastened at the upper bore 505 andlower bore 507 of thefirst wing 504 by an appropriate fastening means, such as a cuff made of biocompatible, bioresorbable material. Alternatively, the ends of the tether 570 fastened to the upper bore 505 andlower bore 507 can be knotted or tied off, or sewn with sutures. - As depicted in
FIG. 7 , a tether also can be used in conjunction withimplant 100 whereimplant 100 has a second wing 632. The tether 670 need not pass through or connect with the second wing 632. Instead, the tether 670 fastens with anupper bore 605 in afirst wing 604 and passes around an upperspinous process 710 and can then pass through a bore 615 in thedistraction guide 610. The tether 670 then passes under the lowerspinous process 720 and fastens with alower bore 607 through thefirst wing 604. The tether 670 can be fastened at theupper bore 605 andlower bore 607 of thefirst wing 604 by an appropriate fastening means, such as a cuff made of biocompatible, bioresorbable material. Alternatively, the ends of the tether 670 fastened to theupper bore 605 andlower bore 607 can be knotted or tied off, or sewn with sutures. - One use contemplated for such devices is implantation in conjunction with intervertebral disk remediation, either implanting a disk replacement device or performing surgical repair on an intervertebral disk. Devices and methods suitable for disk replacement have been described in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/685,134, filed Oct. 14, 2003, entitled “TOOLS FOR IMPLANTING AN ARTIFICIAL VERTEBRAL DISK AND METHOD,” U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/684,669, filed Oct. 14, 2003, entitled “ARTIFICIAL VERTEBRAL DISK REPLACEMENT IMPLANT WITH TRANSLATING PIVOT POINT AND METHOD,” U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60/526,724, filed Dec. 2, 2003, entitled “ARTIFICIAL VERTEBRAL DISK REPLACEMENT IMPLANT WITH TRANSLATING PIVOT POINT AND LATERAL IMPLANT METHOD,” U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/684,668, filed Oct. 14, 2003, entitled “ARTIFICIAL VERTEBRAL DISK REPLACEMENT IMPLANT WITH CROSSBAR SPACER AND METHOD,” U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/517,973, filed Nov. 6, 2003, entitled “ARTIFICIAL VERTEBRAL DISK REPLACEMENT IMPLANT WITH CROSSBAR SPACER AND LATERAL IMPLANT METHOD,” U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/685,011, filed Oct. 14, 2003, entitled “ARTIFICIAL VERTEBRAL DISK REPLACEMENT IMPLANT WITH A SPACER AND METHOD,” and U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 60/524,50, filed Nov. 21, 2003, entitled “ARTIFICIAL VERTEBRAL DISK REPLACEMENT IMPLANT WITH A SPACER AND LATERAL IMPLANT METHOD,” and are incorporated herein by reference. In addition to the total disk replacement devices described in the aforementioned applications, polymer-filled implants based on a biomimetic approach to disk repair and replacement may be used for remediation. Devices and methods describing the use of such implants are found in U.S. Pat. No. 6,416,766, issued Jul. 9, 2002, entitled “BIOLOGICAL DISK REPLACEMENT BONE MORPHOGENIC PROTEIN (BMP) CARRIERS AND ANTI-ADHESION MATERIALS,” and U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/815,387, filed Mar. 22, 2001, entitled “IMPLANTABLE PROSTHETIC OR TISSUE EXPANDING DEVICE,” both incorporated herein by reference.
-
FIG. 8 is a flowchart showing an embodiment of the method of the present invention. Regarding the disclosed devices used in conjunction with disk remediation implants and procedures like those described by the aforementioned incorporated references, load relief of the vertebral disks, either before or after a disk remediation procedure is done 820, is indicated either to assist in the process of disk remediation, or to allow for effective recovery of the surgical procedure, or both. Moreover, the disclosed devices, made in part or completely from the biocompatible, bioresorbable materials described in this disclosure, require no additional surgical procedure for removal after recovery is complete. - The bioresorbable load relief/spinal distraction devices disclosed above can be inserted laterally. The implanting physician after accessing the
intervertebral space 810 optionally can distract the spinous process before inserting the device 830, 840. Alternatively, the tissue expander can be used to distract the spinous processes while inserting the device 830, 840. - The spinous processes can be further stabilized by the use of a bioresorbable tether together with the resorbable distracting device adapted to accept the tether 855, or with a bioresorbable device which does not have wings and need not be adapted to accept the tether 850. If the device does not have a first or second wing, the tether is looped around the spinous processes and fastened, after the implant is positioned between the spinous processes 850.
- Certain of the bioresorbable devices are adapted to accept the tether so that the tether binds not only the spinous processes but also the implant, to maintain temporarily a minimum spacing between the spinous processes 855. The adaptations include an upper bore and a lower bore on the first wing, and a bore through the distraction guide. During the implantation, the device is inserted between the spinous processes with one first of the tether attached to the upper bore of the first wing. A curved needle or other tool can then be used to lead the second end of the tether over an upper spinous process, through the bore in the tissue expander, under a lower spinous process, and through the lower bore of the first wing, to fasten the second end to the lower bore of the first wing. The tether is tightened to the desired degree to maintain a minimal distraction of the spinous processes and the ends of the tether are fastened 860.
- It is within the scope of the present invention to fasten the first end of the tether to the lower bore of the first wing, and to use a curved needle or other implement to lead the second end of the tether below the lower spinous process, through the bore in the tissue expander, over the upper spinous process, and through the upper bore on the first wing, to fasten the second end of the upper bore of the first wing.
- Where the implant has a second wing, the same method is followed as for an implant with one wing, as the second wing need not engage the tether.
- The foregoing description of embodiments of the present disclosure has been provided for the purposes of illustration and description. It is not intended to be exhaustive or to limit the disclosure to the precise forms disclosed. Many modifications and variations will be apparent to the practitioner skilled in the art. The embodiments were chosen and described in order to best explain the principles of this disclosure and its practical application, thereby enabling others skilled in the art to understand various embodiments and with various modifications that are suited to the particular use contemplated. It is intended that the scope of this disclosure be defined by the following claims and its equivalence.
Claims (26)
Priority Applications (4)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US10/996,996 US20050209603A1 (en) | 2003-12-02 | 2004-11-23 | Method for remediation of intervertebral disks |
EP04812608A EP1694256A4 (en) | 2003-12-02 | 2004-12-02 | Bioresorbable interspinous process implant for use with intervertebral disk remediation or replacement implants and procedures |
PCT/US2004/040134 WO2005055868A2 (en) | 2003-12-02 | 2004-12-02 | Bioresorbable interspinous process implant for use with intervertebral disk remediation or replacement implants and procedures |
JP2006542694A JP2007514478A (en) | 2003-12-02 | 2004-12-02 | Bioabsorbable intervertebral or replacement implants for use in the treatment of intervertebral discs and procedures thereof |
Applications Claiming Priority (3)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US52621503P | 2003-12-02 | 2003-12-02 | |
US52635303P | 2003-12-02 | 2003-12-02 | |
US10/996,996 US20050209603A1 (en) | 2003-12-02 | 2004-11-23 | Method for remediation of intervertebral disks |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
US20050209603A1 true US20050209603A1 (en) | 2005-09-22 |
Family
ID=34987337
Family Applications (2)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US10/995,626 Expired - Fee Related US7481839B2 (en) | 2003-12-02 | 2004-11-23 | Bioresorbable interspinous process implant for use with intervertebral disk remediation or replacement implants and procedures |
US10/996,996 Abandoned US20050209603A1 (en) | 2003-12-02 | 2004-11-23 | Method for remediation of intervertebral disks |
Family Applications Before (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US10/995,626 Expired - Fee Related US7481839B2 (en) | 2003-12-02 | 2004-11-23 | Bioresorbable interspinous process implant for use with intervertebral disk remediation or replacement implants and procedures |
Country Status (4)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (2) | US7481839B2 (en) |
EP (1) | EP1694256A4 (en) |
JP (1) | JP2007514478A (en) |
WO (1) | WO2005055868A2 (en) |
Cited By (87)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20060036259A1 (en) * | 2004-08-03 | 2006-02-16 | Carl Allen L | Spine treatment devices and methods |
US20060058790A1 (en) * | 2004-08-03 | 2006-03-16 | Carl Allen L | Spinous process reinforcement device and method |
US20060106397A1 (en) * | 2004-10-25 | 2006-05-18 | Lins Robert E | Interspinous distraction devices and associated methods of insertion |
US20060259037A1 (en) * | 2003-10-30 | 2006-11-16 | Stephan Hartmann | Intervertebral implant |
US20060271055A1 (en) * | 2005-05-12 | 2006-11-30 | Jeffery Thramann | Spinal stabilization |
US20070032790A1 (en) * | 2005-08-05 | 2007-02-08 | Felix Aschmann | Apparatus for treating spinal stenosis |
US20070104711A1 (en) * | 1998-09-25 | 2007-05-10 | Kjell Olmarker | Use of certain drugs for treating nerve root injury |
US20070161993A1 (en) * | 2005-09-27 | 2007-07-12 | Lowery Gary L | Interspinous vertebral stabilization devices |
US20070233129A1 (en) * | 2006-02-17 | 2007-10-04 | Rudolf Bertagnoli | Method and system for performing interspinous space preparation for receiving an implant |
US20070270959A1 (en) * | 2006-04-18 | 2007-11-22 | Sdgi Holdings, Inc. | Arthroplasty device |
US20080015609A1 (en) * | 2006-04-28 | 2008-01-17 | Trautwein Frank T | Instrument system for use with an interspinous implant |
US20080021561A1 (en) * | 1997-01-02 | 2008-01-24 | Zucherman James F | Spine distraction implant and method |
US20080140091A1 (en) * | 2006-12-12 | 2008-06-12 | Dedeyne Patrick G | Minimally invasive suture-based repair of soft tissue |
US20080161919A1 (en) * | 2006-10-03 | 2008-07-03 | Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc. | Dynamic Devices and Methods for Stabilizing Vertebral Members |
US20080161920A1 (en) * | 2006-10-03 | 2008-07-03 | Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc. | Dynamizing Interbody Implant and Methods for Stabilizing Vertebral Members |
US20080172090A1 (en) * | 2007-01-12 | 2008-07-17 | Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc. | Spinal Prosthesis Systems |
US20080228225A1 (en) * | 2006-11-30 | 2008-09-18 | Paradigm Spine, Llc | Interlaminar-Interspinous Vertebral Stabilization System |
US20080300686A1 (en) * | 2007-06-04 | 2008-12-04 | K2M, Inc. | Percutaneous interspinous process device and method |
WO2007075375A3 (en) * | 2005-12-20 | 2008-12-18 | Vertiflex Inc | Systems and methods for posterior dynamic stabilization of the spine |
US20090012614A1 (en) * | 2007-05-08 | 2009-01-08 | Dixon Robert A | Device and method for tethering a spinal implant |
US20090012528A1 (en) * | 2005-08-05 | 2009-01-08 | Felix Aschmann | Apparatus for Treating Spinal Stenosis |
US7524324B2 (en) * | 2004-04-28 | 2009-04-28 | Kyphon Sarl | System and method for an interspinous process implant as a supplement to a spine stabilization implant |
US20090163958A1 (en) * | 2007-12-20 | 2009-06-25 | Peter Tarcha | Compositions, devices, systems, and methods for inhibiting an inflammatory response |
US20090204151A1 (en) * | 2008-02-07 | 2009-08-13 | Scott Bracken | Spinal implant device, procedure and system |
US20090306715A1 (en) * | 2006-02-01 | 2009-12-10 | Jackson Benjamin L | Interspinous process spacer |
US7658753B2 (en) | 2004-08-03 | 2010-02-09 | K Spine, Inc. | Device and method for correcting a spinal deformity |
US20100121456A1 (en) * | 2002-09-10 | 2010-05-13 | Kyphon Sarl | Posterior vertebral support assembly |
US7763074B2 (en) | 2004-10-20 | 2010-07-27 | The Board Of Trustees Of The Leland Stanford Junior University | Systems and methods for posterior dynamic stabilization of the spine |
US20100222816A1 (en) * | 2008-12-22 | 2010-09-02 | Josef Gabelberger | Expandable interspinous process spacer |
US7909853B2 (en) * | 2004-09-23 | 2011-03-22 | Kyphon Sarl | Interspinous process implant including a binder and method of implantation |
US8007517B2 (en) | 2004-10-25 | 2011-08-30 | Lanx, Inc. | Interspinous distraction devices and associated methods of insertion |
US8012207B2 (en) | 2004-10-20 | 2011-09-06 | Vertiflex, Inc. | Systems and methods for posterior dynamic stabilization of the spine |
US8012209B2 (en) | 2004-09-23 | 2011-09-06 | Kyphon Sarl | Interspinous process implant including a binder, binder aligner and method of implantation |
US8034079B2 (en) | 2005-04-12 | 2011-10-11 | Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc. | Implants and methods for posterior dynamic stabilization of a spinal motion segment |
US8048117B2 (en) | 2003-05-22 | 2011-11-01 | Kyphon Sarl | Interspinous process implant and method of implantation |
US8105357B2 (en) | 2006-04-28 | 2012-01-31 | Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc. | Interspinous process brace |
US8114135B2 (en) | 2009-01-16 | 2012-02-14 | Kyphon Sarl | Adjustable surgical cables and methods for treating spinal stenosis |
US8114158B2 (en) | 2004-08-03 | 2012-02-14 | Kspine, Inc. | Facet device and method |
US8123807B2 (en) | 2004-10-20 | 2012-02-28 | Vertiflex, Inc. | Systems and methods for posterior dynamic stabilization of the spine |
US8123782B2 (en) | 2004-10-20 | 2012-02-28 | Vertiflex, Inc. | Interspinous spacer |
US8128662B2 (en) | 2004-10-20 | 2012-03-06 | Vertiflex, Inc. | Minimally invasive tooling for delivery of interspinous spacer |
US8162979B2 (en) | 2007-06-06 | 2012-04-24 | K Spine, Inc. | Medical device and method to correct deformity |
US8167944B2 (en) | 2004-10-20 | 2012-05-01 | The Board Of Trustees Of The Leland Stanford Junior University | Systems and methods for posterior dynamic stabilization of the spine |
US8241330B2 (en) | 2007-01-11 | 2012-08-14 | Lanx, Inc. | Spinous process implants and associated methods |
US8273108B2 (en) | 2004-10-20 | 2012-09-25 | Vertiflex, Inc. | Interspinous spacer |
US8277488B2 (en) | 2004-10-20 | 2012-10-02 | Vertiflex, Inc. | Interspinous spacer |
US8292922B2 (en) | 2004-10-20 | 2012-10-23 | Vertiflex, Inc. | Interspinous spacer |
US8308767B2 (en) | 2007-09-19 | 2012-11-13 | Pioneer Surgical Technology, Inc. | Interlaminar stabilization system |
US8317864B2 (en) | 2004-10-20 | 2012-11-27 | The Board Of Trustees Of The Leland Stanford Junior University | Systems and methods for posterior dynamic stabilization of the spine |
US20130012995A1 (en) * | 2009-12-23 | 2013-01-10 | Qspine Limited | Interspinous Implant |
US8357182B2 (en) | 2009-03-26 | 2013-01-22 | Kspine, Inc. | Alignment system with longitudinal support features |
US8409282B2 (en) | 2004-10-20 | 2013-04-02 | Vertiflex, Inc. | Systems and methods for posterior dynamic stabilization of the spine |
US8425559B2 (en) | 2004-10-20 | 2013-04-23 | Vertiflex, Inc. | Systems and methods for posterior dynamic stabilization of the spine |
US8425560B2 (en) | 2011-03-09 | 2013-04-23 | Farzad Massoudi | Spinal implant device with fixation plates and lag screws and method of implanting |
US8470000B2 (en) | 2005-04-08 | 2013-06-25 | Paradigm Spine, Llc | Interspinous vertebral and lumbosacral stabilization devices and methods of use |
US8496689B2 (en) | 2011-02-23 | 2013-07-30 | Farzad Massoudi | Spinal implant device with fusion cage and fixation plates and method of implanting |
US8613747B2 (en) | 2004-10-20 | 2013-12-24 | Vertiflex, Inc. | Spacer insertion instrument |
US8672976B2 (en) | 2007-02-06 | 2014-03-18 | Pioneer Surgical Technology, Inc. | Intervertebral implant devices and methods for insertion thereof |
US8740948B2 (en) | 2009-12-15 | 2014-06-03 | Vertiflex, Inc. | Spinal spacer for cervical and other vertebra, and associated systems and methods |
US8828058B2 (en) | 2008-11-11 | 2014-09-09 | Kspine, Inc. | Growth directed vertebral fixation system with distractible connector(s) and apical control |
US8845726B2 (en) | 2006-10-18 | 2014-09-30 | Vertiflex, Inc. | Dilator |
US8864828B2 (en) | 2004-10-20 | 2014-10-21 | Vertiflex, Inc. | Interspinous spacer |
US8920472B2 (en) | 2011-11-16 | 2014-12-30 | Kspine, Inc. | Spinal correction and secondary stabilization |
US8945183B2 (en) | 2004-10-20 | 2015-02-03 | Vertiflex, Inc. | Interspinous process spacer instrument system with deployment indicator |
US9023084B2 (en) | 2004-10-20 | 2015-05-05 | The Board Of Trustees Of The Leland Stanford Junior University | Systems and methods for stabilizing the motion or adjusting the position of the spine |
US9055981B2 (en) | 2004-10-25 | 2015-06-16 | Lanx, Inc. | Spinal implants and methods |
US9119680B2 (en) | 2004-10-20 | 2015-09-01 | Vertiflex, Inc. | Interspinous spacer |
US9161783B2 (en) | 2004-10-20 | 2015-10-20 | Vertiflex, Inc. | Interspinous spacer |
US9168071B2 (en) | 2009-09-15 | 2015-10-27 | K2M, Inc. | Growth modulation system |
US9173973B2 (en) | 2006-07-20 | 2015-11-03 | G. Lawrence Thatcher | Bioabsorbable polymeric composition for a medical device |
US9211205B2 (en) | 2006-10-20 | 2015-12-15 | Orbusneich Medical, Inc. | Bioabsorbable medical device with coating |
US9247968B2 (en) | 2007-01-11 | 2016-02-02 | Lanx, Inc. | Spinous process implants and associated methods |
US9333009B2 (en) | 2011-06-03 | 2016-05-10 | K2M, Inc. | Spinal correction system actuators |
US9393055B2 (en) | 2004-10-20 | 2016-07-19 | Vertiflex, Inc. | Spacer insertion instrument |
US9468468B2 (en) | 2011-11-16 | 2016-10-18 | K2M, Inc. | Transverse connector for spinal stabilization system |
US9468471B2 (en) | 2013-09-17 | 2016-10-18 | K2M, Inc. | Transverse coupler adjuster spinal correction systems and methods |
US9468469B2 (en) | 2011-11-16 | 2016-10-18 | K2M, Inc. | Transverse coupler adjuster spinal correction systems and methods |
US20170112959A1 (en) * | 2015-10-12 | 2017-04-27 | Erik Erbe | Novel osteogenic and angiogenic implant material |
US9675303B2 (en) | 2013-03-15 | 2017-06-13 | Vertiflex, Inc. | Visualization systems, instruments and methods of using the same in spinal decompression procedures |
US9724864B2 (en) | 2006-10-20 | 2017-08-08 | Orbusneich Medical, Inc. | Bioabsorbable polymeric composition and medical device |
US9743960B2 (en) | 2007-01-11 | 2017-08-29 | Zimmer Biomet Spine, Inc. | Interspinous implants and methods |
US10342581B2 (en) | 2011-11-16 | 2019-07-09 | K2M, Inc. | System and method for spinal correction |
US10524772B2 (en) | 2014-05-07 | 2020-01-07 | Vertiflex, Inc. | Spinal nerve decompression systems, dilation systems, and methods of using the same |
US10702311B2 (en) | 2011-11-16 | 2020-07-07 | K2M, Inc. | Spinal correction and secondary stabilization |
USD907771S1 (en) | 2017-10-09 | 2021-01-12 | Pioneer Surgical Technology, Inc. | Intervertebral implant |
US11147682B2 (en) | 2017-09-08 | 2021-10-19 | Pioneer Surgical Technology, Inc. | Intervertebral implants, instruments, and methods |
US11812923B2 (en) | 2011-10-07 | 2023-11-14 | Alan Villavicencio | Spinal fixation device |
Families Citing this family (28)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US6206922B1 (en) * | 1995-03-27 | 2001-03-27 | Sdgi Holdings, Inc. | Methods and instruments for interbody fusion |
US6648916B1 (en) * | 1997-12-10 | 2003-11-18 | Sdgi Holdings, Inc. | Osteogenic fusion device |
PL377136A1 (en) * | 2005-09-19 | 2007-04-02 | Lfc Spółka Z Ograniczoną Odpowiedzialnością | Intervertebral space implant |
US20070179618A1 (en) * | 2006-01-31 | 2007-08-02 | Sdgi Holdings, Inc. | Intervertebral prosthetic disc |
WO2008106140A2 (en) | 2007-02-26 | 2008-09-04 | Abdou M Samy | Spinal stabilization systems and methods of use |
WO2008124831A2 (en) * | 2007-04-10 | 2008-10-16 | Lee David M D | Adjustable spine distraction implant |
JP5416090B2 (en) * | 2007-04-18 | 2014-02-12 | スミス アンド ネフュー ピーエルシー | Expansion molding of shape memory polymer |
EP2142227B1 (en) | 2007-04-19 | 2012-02-29 | Smith & Nephew, Inc. | Multi-modal shape memory polymers |
DE602008006181D1 (en) * | 2007-04-19 | 2011-05-26 | Smith & Nephew Inc | GRAFT FIXATION |
US8142479B2 (en) * | 2007-05-01 | 2012-03-27 | Spinal Simplicity Llc | Interspinous process implants having deployable engagement arms |
EP2142146A4 (en) * | 2007-05-01 | 2010-12-01 | Spinal Simplicity Llc | Interspinous implants and methods for implanting same |
US20090105773A1 (en) * | 2007-10-23 | 2009-04-23 | Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc. | Method and apparatus for insertion of an interspinous process device |
JP5162741B2 (en) * | 2007-12-05 | 2013-03-13 | 国立大学法人神戸大学 | Spinous process fixture |
EP2273952B1 (en) | 2008-04-02 | 2018-02-21 | Pioneer Surgical Technology, Inc. | Intervertebral implant devices for supporting vertebrae and devices for insertion thereof |
US9301788B2 (en) | 2008-04-10 | 2016-04-05 | Life Spine, Inc. | Adjustable spine distraction implant |
US9861399B2 (en) | 2009-03-13 | 2018-01-09 | Spinal Simplicity, Llc | Interspinous process implant having a body with a removable end portion |
US8945184B2 (en) * | 2009-03-13 | 2015-02-03 | Spinal Simplicity Llc. | Interspinous process implant and fusion cage spacer |
US9757164B2 (en) | 2013-01-07 | 2017-09-12 | Spinal Simplicity Llc | Interspinous process implant having deployable anchor blades |
WO2010129692A1 (en) | 2009-05-05 | 2010-11-11 | Cornell University | Composite tissue-engineered intervertebral disc with self-assembled annular alignment |
US8771317B2 (en) * | 2009-10-28 | 2014-07-08 | Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc. | Interspinous process implant and method of implantation |
US8603143B2 (en) | 2010-12-05 | 2013-12-10 | James C. Robinson | Spinous process fixation apparatus |
US8603142B2 (en) | 2010-12-05 | 2013-12-10 | James C. Robinson | Spinous process fixation apparatus and method |
US9358122B2 (en) | 2011-01-07 | 2016-06-07 | K2M, Inc. | Interbody spacer |
US9149306B2 (en) | 2011-06-21 | 2015-10-06 | Seaspine, Inc. | Spinous process device |
US9011450B2 (en) | 2012-08-08 | 2015-04-21 | DePuy Synthes Products, LLC | Surgical instrument |
US10478313B1 (en) | 2014-01-10 | 2019-11-19 | Nuvasive, Inc. | Spinal fusion implant and related methods |
US10335207B2 (en) | 2015-12-29 | 2019-07-02 | Nuvasive, Inc. | Spinous process plate fixation assembly |
WO2019140438A1 (en) | 2018-01-15 | 2019-07-18 | Sands Steven Saam | Hybrid intramedullary rods |
Citations (94)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US3426364A (en) * | 1966-08-25 | 1969-02-11 | Colorado State Univ Research F | Prosthetic appliance for replacing one or more natural vertebrae |
US3867728A (en) * | 1971-12-30 | 1975-02-25 | Cutter Lab | Prosthesis for spinal repair |
US3875595A (en) * | 1974-04-15 | 1975-04-08 | Edward C Froning | Intervertebral disc prosthesis and instruments for locating same |
US4309777A (en) * | 1980-11-13 | 1982-01-12 | Patil Arun A | Artificial intervertebral disc |
US4369769A (en) * | 1980-06-13 | 1983-01-25 | Edwards Charles C | Spinal fixation device and method |
US4501269A (en) * | 1981-12-11 | 1985-02-26 | Washington State University Research Foundation, Inc. | Process for fusing bone joints |
US4636217A (en) * | 1985-04-23 | 1987-01-13 | Regents Of The University Of Minnesota | Anterior spinal implant |
US4657550A (en) * | 1984-12-21 | 1987-04-14 | Daher Youssef H | Buttressing device usable in a vertebral prosthesis |
US4904261A (en) * | 1987-08-06 | 1990-02-27 | A. W. Showell (Surgicraft) Limited | Spinal implants |
US4904260A (en) * | 1987-08-20 | 1990-02-27 | Cedar Surgical, Inc. | Prosthetic disc containing therapeutic material |
US4911718A (en) * | 1988-06-10 | 1990-03-27 | University Of Medicine & Dentistry Of N.J. | Functional and biocompatible intervertebral disc spacer |
US4997432A (en) * | 1988-03-23 | 1991-03-05 | Waldemar Link Gmbh & Co. | Surgical instrument set |
US5002576A (en) * | 1988-06-06 | 1991-03-26 | Mecron Medizinische Produkte Gmbh | Intervertebral disk endoprosthesis |
US5108438A (en) * | 1989-03-02 | 1992-04-28 | Regen Corporation | Prosthetic intervertebral disc |
US5108442A (en) * | 1991-05-09 | 1992-04-28 | Boehringer Mannheim Corporation | Prosthetic implant locking assembly |
US5180381A (en) * | 1991-09-24 | 1993-01-19 | Aust Gilbert M | Anterior lumbar/cervical bicortical compression plate |
US5192327A (en) * | 1991-03-22 | 1993-03-09 | Brantigan John W | Surgical prosthetic implant for vertebrae |
US5192326A (en) * | 1990-12-21 | 1993-03-09 | Pfizer Hospital Products Group, Inc. | Hydrogel bead intervertebral disc nucleus |
US5290312A (en) * | 1991-09-03 | 1994-03-01 | Alphatec | Artificial vertebral body |
US5306308A (en) * | 1989-10-23 | 1994-04-26 | Ulrich Gross | Intervertebral implant |
US5306307A (en) * | 1991-07-22 | 1994-04-26 | Calcitek, Inc. | Spinal disk implant |
US5306309A (en) * | 1992-05-04 | 1994-04-26 | Calcitek, Inc. | Spinal disk implant and implantation kit |
US5383884A (en) * | 1992-12-04 | 1995-01-24 | American Biomed, Inc. | Spinal disc surgical instrument |
US5390683A (en) * | 1991-02-22 | 1995-02-21 | Pisharodi; Madhavan | Spinal implantation methods utilizing a middle expandable implant |
US5395372A (en) * | 1993-09-07 | 1995-03-07 | Danek Medical, Inc. | Spinal strut graft holding staple |
US5395317A (en) * | 1991-10-30 | 1995-03-07 | Smith & Nephew Dyonics, Inc. | Unilateral biportal percutaneous surgical procedure |
US5397364A (en) * | 1993-10-12 | 1995-03-14 | Danek Medical, Inc. | Anterior interbody fusion device |
US5401269A (en) * | 1992-03-13 | 1995-03-28 | Waldemar Link Gmbh & Co. | Intervertebral disc endoprosthesis |
US5480401A (en) * | 1993-02-17 | 1996-01-02 | Psi | Extra-discal inter-vertebral prosthesis for controlling the variations of the inter-vertebral distance by means of a double damper |
US5480442A (en) * | 1993-06-24 | 1996-01-02 | Man Ceramics Gmbh | Fixedly adjustable intervertebral prosthesis |
US5484437A (en) * | 1988-06-13 | 1996-01-16 | Michelson; Gary K. | Apparatus and method of inserting spinal implants |
US5489308A (en) * | 1989-07-06 | 1996-02-06 | Spine-Tech, Inc. | Spinal implant |
US5489307A (en) * | 1993-02-10 | 1996-02-06 | Spine-Tech, Inc. | Spinal stabilization surgical method |
US5496318A (en) * | 1993-01-08 | 1996-03-05 | Advanced Spine Fixation Systems, Inc. | Interspinous segmental spine fixation device |
US5507816A (en) * | 1991-12-04 | 1996-04-16 | Customflex Limited | Spinal vertebrae implants |
US5591235A (en) * | 1995-03-15 | 1997-01-07 | Kuslich; Stephen D. | Spinal fixation device |
US5593409A (en) * | 1988-06-13 | 1997-01-14 | Sofamor Danek Group, Inc. | Interbody spinal fusion implants |
US5599279A (en) * | 1994-03-16 | 1997-02-04 | Gus J. Slotman | Surgical instruments and method useful for endoscopic spinal procedures |
US5601556A (en) * | 1994-03-18 | 1997-02-11 | Pisharodi; Madhavan | Apparatus for spondylolisthesis reduction |
US5603713A (en) * | 1991-09-24 | 1997-02-18 | Aust; Gilbert M. | Anterior lumbar/cervical bicortical compression plate |
US5609636A (en) * | 1994-05-23 | 1997-03-11 | Spine-Tech, Inc. | Spinal implant |
US5609634A (en) * | 1992-07-07 | 1997-03-11 | Voydeville; Gilles | Intervertebral prosthesis making possible rotatory stabilization and flexion/extension stabilization |
US5609635A (en) * | 1988-06-28 | 1997-03-11 | Michelson; Gary K. | Lordotic interbody spinal fusion implants |
US5620458A (en) * | 1994-03-16 | 1997-04-15 | United States Surgical Corporation | Surgical instruments useful for endoscopic spinal procedures |
US5716416A (en) * | 1996-09-10 | 1998-02-10 | Lin; Chih-I | Artificial intervertebral disk and method for implanting the same |
US5716415A (en) * | 1993-10-01 | 1998-02-10 | Acromed Corporation | Spinal implant |
US5741253A (en) * | 1988-06-13 | 1998-04-21 | Michelson; Gary Karlin | Method for inserting spinal implants |
US5860977A (en) * | 1997-01-02 | 1999-01-19 | Saint Francis Medical Technologies, Llc | Spine distraction implant and method |
US5860973A (en) * | 1995-02-27 | 1999-01-19 | Michelson; Gary Karlin | Translateral spinal implant |
US5865845A (en) * | 1996-03-05 | 1999-02-02 | Thalgott; John S. | Prosthetic intervertebral disc |
US5865846A (en) * | 1994-11-14 | 1999-02-02 | Bryan; Vincent | Human spinal disc prosthesis |
US5885292A (en) * | 1996-06-25 | 1999-03-23 | Sdgi Holdings, Inc. | Minimally invasive spinal surgical methods and instruments |
US5885299A (en) * | 1994-09-15 | 1999-03-23 | Surgical Dynamics, Inc. | Apparatus and method for implant insertion |
US5888227A (en) * | 1995-10-20 | 1999-03-30 | Synthes (U.S.A.) | Inter-vertebral implant |
US5888226A (en) * | 1997-11-12 | 1999-03-30 | Rogozinski; Chaim | Intervertebral prosthetic disc |
US5888224A (en) * | 1993-09-21 | 1999-03-30 | Synthesis (U.S.A.) | Implant for intervertebral space |
US5888222A (en) * | 1995-10-16 | 1999-03-30 | Sdgi Holding, Inc. | Intervertebral spacers |
US5893889A (en) * | 1997-06-20 | 1999-04-13 | Harrington; Michael | Artificial disc |
US5893890A (en) * | 1994-03-18 | 1999-04-13 | Perumala Corporation | Rotating, locking intervertebral disk stabilizer and applicator |
US5895426A (en) * | 1996-09-06 | 1999-04-20 | Osteotech, Inc. | Fusion implant device and method of use |
US5895428A (en) * | 1996-11-01 | 1999-04-20 | Berry; Don | Load bearing spinal joint implant |
US5895437A (en) * | 1995-07-28 | 1999-04-20 | Agip S.P.A. | Method for continuous updating in real time of bidimensional and tridimensional seismic images of a subsurface section using drilling well data |
US6019793A (en) * | 1996-10-21 | 2000-02-01 | Synthes | Surgical prosthetic device |
US6019792A (en) * | 1998-04-23 | 2000-02-01 | Cauthen Research Group, Inc. | Articulating spinal implant |
US6022376A (en) * | 1997-06-06 | 2000-02-08 | Raymedica, Inc. | Percutaneous prosthetic spinal disc nucleus and method of manufacture |
US6039761A (en) * | 1997-02-12 | 2000-03-21 | Li Medical Technologies, Inc. | Intervertebral spacer and tool and method for emplacement thereof |
US6039763A (en) * | 1998-10-27 | 2000-03-21 | Disc Replacement Technologies, Inc. | Articulating spinal disc prosthesis |
US6042582A (en) * | 1997-05-20 | 2000-03-28 | Ray; Charles D. | Instrumentation and method for facilitating insertion of spinal implant |
US6045579A (en) * | 1997-05-01 | 2000-04-04 | Spinal Concepts, Inc. | Adjustable height fusion device |
US6176882B1 (en) * | 1998-02-20 | 2001-01-23 | Biedermann Motech Gmbh | Intervertebral implant |
US6179874B1 (en) * | 1998-04-23 | 2001-01-30 | Cauthen Research Group, Inc. | Articulating spinal implant |
US6190387B1 (en) * | 1997-01-02 | 2001-02-20 | St. Francis Medical Technologies, Inc. | Spine distraction implant |
US6190414B1 (en) * | 1996-10-31 | 2001-02-20 | Surgical Dynamics Inc. | Apparatus for fusion of adjacent bone structures |
US6193757B1 (en) * | 1998-10-29 | 2001-02-27 | Sdgi Holdings, Inc. | Expandable intervertebral spacers |
US6206922B1 (en) * | 1995-03-27 | 2001-03-27 | Sdgi Holdings, Inc. | Methods and instruments for interbody fusion |
US6342074B1 (en) * | 1999-04-30 | 2002-01-29 | Nathan S. Simpson | Anterior lumbar interbody fusion implant and method for fusing adjacent vertebrae |
US6348071B1 (en) * | 1997-10-31 | 2002-02-19 | Depuy Acromed, Inc. | Spinal disc |
US6350283B1 (en) * | 2000-04-19 | 2002-02-26 | Gary K. Michelson | Bone hemi-lumbar interbody spinal implant having an asymmetrical leading end and method of installation thereof |
US6503279B1 (en) * | 1996-09-04 | 2003-01-07 | Synthes (Usa) | Intervertebral implant |
US6514256B2 (en) * | 1997-01-02 | 2003-02-04 | St. Francis Medical Technologies, Inc. | Spine distraction implant and method |
US6517580B1 (en) * | 2000-03-03 | 2003-02-11 | Scient'x Societe A Responsabilite Limited | Disk prosthesis for cervical vertebrae |
US6520993B2 (en) * | 2000-12-29 | 2003-02-18 | Depuy Acromed, Inc. | Spinal implant |
US6520996B1 (en) * | 1999-06-04 | 2003-02-18 | Depuy Acromed, Incorporated | Orthopedic implant |
US6524312B2 (en) * | 2000-01-06 | 2003-02-25 | Spinal Concepts, Inc. | Instrument and method for implanting an interbody fusion device |
US6527806B2 (en) * | 2001-07-16 | 2003-03-04 | Third Millennium Engineering, Llc | Intervertebral spacer device having a spiral wave washer force restoring element |
US6527804B1 (en) * | 1998-12-11 | 2003-03-04 | Dimso (Distribution Medicale Du Sud-Quest) | Intervertebral disk prosthesis |
US6527773B1 (en) * | 1999-10-07 | 2003-03-04 | Osteotech, Inc. | Cervical dowel and insertion tool |
US6530955B2 (en) * | 1999-06-08 | 2003-03-11 | Osteotech, Inc. | Ramp-shaped intervertebral implant |
US6530933B1 (en) * | 1998-12-31 | 2003-03-11 | Teresa T. Yeung | Methods and devices for fastening bulging or herniated intervertebral discs |
US6682562B2 (en) * | 2000-03-10 | 2004-01-27 | Eurosurgical Sa | Intervertebral disc prosthesis |
US20040030388A1 (en) * | 2002-05-30 | 2004-02-12 | Null William B. | Laminoplasty devices and methods |
US6706070B1 (en) * | 1997-05-01 | 2004-03-16 | Spinal Concepts, Inc. | Multi-variable-height fusion device |
US6706068B2 (en) * | 2002-04-23 | 2004-03-16 | Bret A. Ferree | Artificial disc replacements with natural kinematics |
US6712852B1 (en) * | 2002-09-30 | 2004-03-30 | Depuy Spine, Inc. | Laminoplasty cage |
Family Cites Families (97)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US2456806A (en) | 1947-01-14 | 1948-12-21 | Erwin B Wolffe | Vaginal gauge |
US2677369A (en) | 1952-03-26 | 1954-05-04 | Fred L Knowles | Apparatus for treatment of the spinal column |
CA1146301A (en) | 1980-06-13 | 1983-05-17 | J. David Kuntz | Intervertebral disc prosthesis |
GB2083754B (en) * | 1980-09-15 | 1984-04-26 | Rezaian Seyed Mahmoud | Spinal fixator |
US4338926A (en) | 1980-11-21 | 1982-07-13 | Howmedica, Inc. | Bone fracture prosthesis with controlled stiffness |
US4479491A (en) | 1982-07-26 | 1984-10-30 | Martin Felix M | Intervertebral stabilization implant |
US4599084A (en) | 1983-05-24 | 1986-07-08 | American Hospital Supply Corp. | Method of using biological tissue to promote even bone growth |
US4554914A (en) | 1983-10-04 | 1985-11-26 | Kapp John P | Prosthetic vertebral body |
US4553273A (en) | 1983-11-23 | 1985-11-19 | Henry Ford Hospital | Vertebral body prosthesis and spine stabilizing method |
US4696290A (en) | 1983-12-16 | 1987-09-29 | Acromed Corporation | Apparatus for straightening spinal columns |
EP0176728B1 (en) | 1984-09-04 | 1989-07-26 | Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin | Intervertebral-disc prosthesis |
US4685447A (en) | 1985-03-25 | 1987-08-11 | Pmt Corporation | Tissue expander system |
US4599086A (en) | 1985-06-07 | 1986-07-08 | Doty James R | Spine stabilization device and method |
US4743256A (en) | 1985-10-04 | 1988-05-10 | Brantigan John W | Surgical prosthetic implant facilitating vertebral interbody fusion and method |
US5133755A (en) | 1986-01-28 | 1992-07-28 | Thm Biomedical, Inc. | Method and apparatus for diodegradable, osteogenic, bone graft substitute device |
FI80605C (en) * | 1986-11-03 | 1990-07-10 | Biocon Oy | Bone surgical biocomposite material |
CH671691A5 (en) | 1987-01-08 | 1989-09-29 | Sulzer Ag | |
US4834757A (en) | 1987-01-22 | 1989-05-30 | Brantigan John W | Prosthetic implant |
CA1283501C (en) | 1987-02-12 | 1991-04-30 | Thomas P. Hedman | Artificial spinal disc |
US4714469A (en) | 1987-02-26 | 1987-12-22 | Pfizer Hospital Products Group, Inc. | Spinal implant |
US4790303A (en) | 1987-03-11 | 1988-12-13 | Acromed Corporation | Apparatus and method for securing bone graft |
US4863477A (en) | 1987-05-12 | 1989-09-05 | Monson Gary L | Synthetic intervertebral disc prosthesis |
US5258043A (en) | 1987-07-20 | 1993-11-02 | Regen Corporation | Method for making a prosthetic intervertebral disc |
JPH01136655A (en) | 1987-11-24 | 1989-05-29 | Asahi Optical Co Ltd | Movable type pyramid spacer |
US4874389A (en) | 1987-12-07 | 1989-10-17 | Downey Ernest L | Replacement disc |
AU624627B2 (en) | 1988-08-18 | 1992-06-18 | Johnson & Johnson Orthopaedics, Inc. | Functional and biocompatible intervertebral disc spacer containing elastomeric material of varying hardness |
US4961740B1 (en) | 1988-10-17 | 1997-01-14 | Surgical Dynamics Inc | V-thread fusion cage and method of fusing a bone joint |
FR2642645B1 (en) * | 1989-02-03 | 1992-08-14 | Breard Francis | FLEXIBLE INTERVERTEBRAL STABILIZER AND METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR CONTROLLING ITS VOLTAGE BEFORE PLACEMENT ON THE RACHIS |
US4969888A (en) | 1989-02-09 | 1990-11-13 | Arie Scholten | Surgical protocol for fixation of osteoporotic bone using inflatable device |
CA1318469C (en) | 1989-02-15 | 1993-06-01 | Acromed Corporation | Artificial disc |
CA2007210C (en) | 1989-05-10 | 1996-07-09 | Stephen D. Kuslich | Intervertebral reamer |
US5895427A (en) * | 1989-07-06 | 1999-04-20 | Sulzer Spine-Tech Inc. | Method for spinal fixation |
US4936848A (en) | 1989-09-22 | 1990-06-26 | Bagby George W | Implant for vertebrae |
US4932975A (en) | 1989-10-16 | 1990-06-12 | Vanderbilt University | Vertebral prosthesis |
US5055104A (en) | 1989-11-06 | 1991-10-08 | Surgical Dynamics, Inc. | Surgically implanting threaded fusion cages between adjacent low-back vertebrae by an anterior approach |
US5059193A (en) | 1989-11-20 | 1991-10-22 | Spine-Tech, Inc. | Expandable spinal implant and surgical method |
US5059194A (en) | 1990-02-12 | 1991-10-22 | Michelson Gary K | Cervical distractor |
FR2659226B1 (en) | 1990-03-07 | 1992-05-29 | Jbs Sa | PROSTHESIS FOR INTERVERTEBRAL DISCS AND ITS IMPLEMENTATION INSTRUMENTS. |
EP0453393B1 (en) | 1990-04-20 | 1993-10-06 | SULZER Medizinaltechnik AG | Implant, particularly intervertebral prosthesis |
US5047055A (en) | 1990-12-21 | 1991-09-10 | Pfizer Hospital Products Group, Inc. | Hydrogel intervertebral disc nucleus |
US5123926A (en) | 1991-02-22 | 1992-06-23 | Madhavan Pisharodi | Artificial spinal prosthesis |
JP3007903B2 (en) | 1991-03-29 | 2000-02-14 | 京セラ株式会社 | Artificial disc |
US5320644A (en) | 1991-08-30 | 1994-06-14 | Sulzer Brothers Limited | Intervertebral disk prosthesis |
US5313962A (en) | 1991-10-18 | 1994-05-24 | Obenchain Theodore G | Method of performing laparoscopic lumbar discectomy |
US5263953A (en) | 1991-12-31 | 1993-11-23 | Spine-Tech, Inc. | Apparatus and system for fusing bone joints |
US5258031A (en) | 1992-01-06 | 1993-11-02 | Danek Medical | Intervertebral disk arthroplasty |
US5425773A (en) | 1992-01-06 | 1995-06-20 | Danek Medical, Inc. | Intervertebral disk arthroplasty device |
US5167662A (en) | 1992-01-24 | 1992-12-01 | Zimmer, Inc. | Temporary clamp and inserter for a posterior midline spinal clamp |
DK0555033T3 (en) | 1992-02-07 | 1999-12-13 | Smith & Nephew Inc | Surface-cured, biocompatible metal medical implants |
DE59206917D1 (en) | 1992-04-21 | 1996-09-19 | Sulzer Medizinaltechnik Ag | Artificial intervertebral disc body |
FR2692952B1 (en) | 1992-06-25 | 1996-04-05 | Psi | IMPROVED SHOCK ABSORBER WITH MOVEMENT LIMIT. |
US5350397A (en) | 1992-11-13 | 1994-09-27 | Target Therapeutics, Inc. | Axially detachable embolic coil assembly |
US5370693A (en) | 1992-09-28 | 1994-12-06 | Depuy Inc. | Orthopedic implant augmentation and stabilization device |
US5246458A (en) | 1992-10-07 | 1993-09-21 | Graham Donald V | Artificial disk |
US5354302A (en) | 1992-11-06 | 1994-10-11 | Ko Sung Tao | Medical device and method for facilitating intra-tissue visual observation and manipulation of distensible tissues |
US5425777A (en) | 1992-12-23 | 1995-06-20 | Sarkisian; James S. | Artificial finger joint |
US5456722A (en) | 1993-01-06 | 1995-10-10 | Smith & Nephew Richards Inc. | Load bearing polymeric cable |
US5336223A (en) | 1993-02-04 | 1994-08-09 | Rogers Charles L | Telescoping spinal fixator |
US5439464A (en) | 1993-03-09 | 1995-08-08 | Shapiro Partners Limited | Method and instruments for performing arthroscopic spinal surgery |
US5423817A (en) | 1993-07-29 | 1995-06-13 | Lin; Chih-I | Intervertebral fusing device |
US5360430A (en) | 1993-07-29 | 1994-11-01 | Lin Chih I | Intervertebral locking device |
US5423816A (en) | 1993-07-29 | 1995-06-13 | Lin; Chih I. | Intervertebral locking device |
US5458641A (en) * | 1993-09-08 | 1995-10-17 | Ramirez Jimenez; Juan J. | Vertebral body prosthesis |
US5425772A (en) | 1993-09-20 | 1995-06-20 | Brantigan; John W. | Prosthetic implant for intervertebral spinal fusion |
US5443514A (en) | 1993-10-01 | 1995-08-22 | Acromed Corporation | Method for using spinal implants |
US5458642A (en) | 1994-01-18 | 1995-10-17 | Beer; John C. | Synthetic intervertebral disc |
US5443515A (en) | 1994-01-26 | 1995-08-22 | Implex Corporation | Vertebral body prosthetic implant with slidably positionable stabilizing member |
US5431658A (en) | 1994-02-14 | 1995-07-11 | Moskovich; Ronald | Facilitator for vertebrae grafts and prostheses |
US5610825A (en) * | 1994-11-08 | 1997-03-11 | Johnson; William J. | Method and apparatus for the display of digitized analog signal loss |
AU7178698A (en) * | 1996-11-15 | 1998-06-03 | Advanced Bio Surfaces, Inc. | Biomaterial system for in situ tissue repair |
US7306628B2 (en) * | 2002-10-29 | 2007-12-11 | St. Francis Medical Technologies | Interspinous process apparatus and method with a selectably expandable spacer |
US6902566B2 (en) * | 1997-01-02 | 2005-06-07 | St. Francis Medical Technologies, Inc. | Spinal implants, insertion instruments, and methods of use |
US6156038A (en) * | 1997-01-02 | 2000-12-05 | St. Francis Medical Technologies, Inc. | Spine distraction implant and method |
EP1011503B1 (en) * | 1997-02-06 | 2009-04-22 | Howmedica Osteonics Corp. | Expandable non-threaded spinal fusion device |
GB9713330D0 (en) * | 1997-06-25 | 1997-08-27 | Bridport Gundry Plc | Surgical implant |
US6241771B1 (en) * | 1997-08-13 | 2001-06-05 | Cambridge Scientific, Inc. | Resorbable interbody spinal fusion devices |
FR2767675B1 (en) * | 1997-08-26 | 1999-12-03 | Materiel Orthopedique En Abreg | INTERSOMATIC IMPLANT AND ANCILLARY OF PREPARATION SUITABLE FOR ALLOWING ITS POSITION |
ATE380509T1 (en) * | 1997-10-27 | 2007-12-15 | St Francis Medical Tech Inc | SPINE DISTRACTION IMPLANT |
US6146420A (en) * | 1997-12-10 | 2000-11-14 | Sdgi Holdings, Inc. | Osteogenic fusion device |
FR2775183B1 (en) * | 1998-02-20 | 2000-08-04 | Jean Taylor | INTER-SPINOUS PROSTHESIS |
US6241769B1 (en) * | 1998-05-06 | 2001-06-05 | Cortek, Inc. | Implant for spinal fusion |
WO1999060957A1 (en) * | 1998-05-27 | 1999-12-02 | Nuvasive, Inc. | Methods and apparatus for separating and stabilizing adjacent vertebrae |
US6224630B1 (en) * | 1998-05-29 | 2001-05-01 | Advanced Bio Surfaces, Inc. | Implantable tissue repair device |
US7029473B2 (en) * | 1998-10-20 | 2006-04-18 | St. Francis Medical Technologies, Inc. | Deflectable spacer for use as an interspinous process implant and method |
ATE252920T1 (en) * | 1999-08-06 | 2003-11-15 | Isotis Nv | FIXING DEVICE |
US6264695B1 (en) * | 1999-09-30 | 2001-07-24 | Replication Medical, Inc. | Spinal nucleus implant |
US6623492B1 (en) * | 2000-01-25 | 2003-09-23 | Smith & Nephew, Inc. | Tissue fastener |
US6332894B1 (en) * | 2000-03-07 | 2001-12-25 | Zimmer, Inc. | Polymer filled spinal fusion cage |
FR2811540B1 (en) * | 2000-07-12 | 2003-04-25 | Spine Next Sa | IMPORTING INTERVERTEBRAL IMPLANT |
US6620196B1 (en) * | 2000-08-30 | 2003-09-16 | Sdgi Holdings, Inc. | Intervertebral disc nucleus implants and methods |
US6743257B2 (en) * | 2000-12-19 | 2004-06-01 | Cortek, Inc. | Dynamic implanted intervertebral spacer |
US6827743B2 (en) * | 2001-02-28 | 2004-12-07 | Sdgi Holdings, Inc. | Woven orthopedic implants |
US7128760B2 (en) * | 2001-03-27 | 2006-10-31 | Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc. | Radially expanding interbody spinal fusion implants, instrumentation, and methods of insertion |
US6719795B1 (en) * | 2001-04-25 | 2004-04-13 | Macropore Biosurgery, Inc. | Resorbable posterior spinal fusion system |
AU2002318159A1 (en) * | 2001-06-29 | 2003-03-03 | The Regents Of The University Of California | Biodegradable/bioactive nucleus pulposus implant and method for treating degenerated intervertebral discs |
US6733534B2 (en) * | 2002-01-29 | 2004-05-11 | Sdgi Holdings, Inc. | System and method for spine spacing |
US7335203B2 (en) * | 2003-02-12 | 2008-02-26 | Kyphon Inc. | System and method for immobilizing adjacent spinous processes |
-
2004
- 2004-11-23 US US10/995,626 patent/US7481839B2/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
- 2004-11-23 US US10/996,996 patent/US20050209603A1/en not_active Abandoned
- 2004-12-02 JP JP2006542694A patent/JP2007514478A/en active Pending
- 2004-12-02 EP EP04812608A patent/EP1694256A4/en not_active Withdrawn
- 2004-12-02 WO PCT/US2004/040134 patent/WO2005055868A2/en active Application Filing
Patent Citations (99)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US3426364A (en) * | 1966-08-25 | 1969-02-11 | Colorado State Univ Research F | Prosthetic appliance for replacing one or more natural vertebrae |
US3867728A (en) * | 1971-12-30 | 1975-02-25 | Cutter Lab | Prosthesis for spinal repair |
US3875595A (en) * | 1974-04-15 | 1975-04-08 | Edward C Froning | Intervertebral disc prosthesis and instruments for locating same |
US4369769A (en) * | 1980-06-13 | 1983-01-25 | Edwards Charles C | Spinal fixation device and method |
US4309777A (en) * | 1980-11-13 | 1982-01-12 | Patil Arun A | Artificial intervertebral disc |
US4501269A (en) * | 1981-12-11 | 1985-02-26 | Washington State University Research Foundation, Inc. | Process for fusing bone joints |
US4657550A (en) * | 1984-12-21 | 1987-04-14 | Daher Youssef H | Buttressing device usable in a vertebral prosthesis |
US4636217A (en) * | 1985-04-23 | 1987-01-13 | Regents Of The University Of Minnesota | Anterior spinal implant |
US4904261A (en) * | 1987-08-06 | 1990-02-27 | A. W. Showell (Surgicraft) Limited | Spinal implants |
US4904260A (en) * | 1987-08-20 | 1990-02-27 | Cedar Surgical, Inc. | Prosthetic disc containing therapeutic material |
US4997432A (en) * | 1988-03-23 | 1991-03-05 | Waldemar Link Gmbh & Co. | Surgical instrument set |
US5002576A (en) * | 1988-06-06 | 1991-03-26 | Mecron Medizinische Produkte Gmbh | Intervertebral disk endoprosthesis |
US4911718A (en) * | 1988-06-10 | 1990-03-27 | University Of Medicine & Dentistry Of N.J. | Functional and biocompatible intervertebral disc spacer |
US5741253A (en) * | 1988-06-13 | 1998-04-21 | Michelson; Gary Karlin | Method for inserting spinal implants |
US5484437A (en) * | 1988-06-13 | 1996-01-16 | Michelson; Gary K. | Apparatus and method of inserting spinal implants |
US5505732A (en) * | 1988-06-13 | 1996-04-09 | Michelson; Gary K. | Apparatus and method of inserting spinal implants |
US5593409A (en) * | 1988-06-13 | 1997-01-14 | Sofamor Danek Group, Inc. | Interbody spinal fusion implants |
US5609635A (en) * | 1988-06-28 | 1997-03-11 | Michelson; Gary K. | Lordotic interbody spinal fusion implants |
US5108438A (en) * | 1989-03-02 | 1992-04-28 | Regen Corporation | Prosthetic intervertebral disc |
US5489308A (en) * | 1989-07-06 | 1996-02-06 | Spine-Tech, Inc. | Spinal implant |
US5306308A (en) * | 1989-10-23 | 1994-04-26 | Ulrich Gross | Intervertebral implant |
US5192326A (en) * | 1990-12-21 | 1993-03-09 | Pfizer Hospital Products Group, Inc. | Hydrogel bead intervertebral disc nucleus |
US5390683A (en) * | 1991-02-22 | 1995-02-21 | Pisharodi; Madhavan | Spinal implantation methods utilizing a middle expandable implant |
US5192327A (en) * | 1991-03-22 | 1993-03-09 | Brantigan John W | Surgical prosthetic implant for vertebrae |
US5108442A (en) * | 1991-05-09 | 1992-04-28 | Boehringer Mannheim Corporation | Prosthetic implant locking assembly |
US5306307A (en) * | 1991-07-22 | 1994-04-26 | Calcitek, Inc. | Spinal disk implant |
US5290312A (en) * | 1991-09-03 | 1994-03-01 | Alphatec | Artificial vertebral body |
US5603713A (en) * | 1991-09-24 | 1997-02-18 | Aust; Gilbert M. | Anterior lumbar/cervical bicortical compression plate |
US5180381A (en) * | 1991-09-24 | 1993-01-19 | Aust Gilbert M | Anterior lumbar/cervical bicortical compression plate |
US5395317A (en) * | 1991-10-30 | 1995-03-07 | Smith & Nephew Dyonics, Inc. | Unilateral biportal percutaneous surgical procedure |
US5507816A (en) * | 1991-12-04 | 1996-04-16 | Customflex Limited | Spinal vertebrae implants |
US5401269A (en) * | 1992-03-13 | 1995-03-28 | Waldemar Link Gmbh & Co. | Intervertebral disc endoprosthesis |
US5306309A (en) * | 1992-05-04 | 1994-04-26 | Calcitek, Inc. | Spinal disk implant and implantation kit |
US5609634A (en) * | 1992-07-07 | 1997-03-11 | Voydeville; Gilles | Intervertebral prosthesis making possible rotatory stabilization and flexion/extension stabilization |
US5383884A (en) * | 1992-12-04 | 1995-01-24 | American Biomed, Inc. | Spinal disc surgical instrument |
US5496318A (en) * | 1993-01-08 | 1996-03-05 | Advanced Spine Fixation Systems, Inc. | Interspinous segmental spine fixation device |
US5489307A (en) * | 1993-02-10 | 1996-02-06 | Spine-Tech, Inc. | Spinal stabilization surgical method |
US5480401A (en) * | 1993-02-17 | 1996-01-02 | Psi | Extra-discal inter-vertebral prosthesis for controlling the variations of the inter-vertebral distance by means of a double damper |
US5480442A (en) * | 1993-06-24 | 1996-01-02 | Man Ceramics Gmbh | Fixedly adjustable intervertebral prosthesis |
US5395372A (en) * | 1993-09-07 | 1995-03-07 | Danek Medical, Inc. | Spinal strut graft holding staple |
US5888224A (en) * | 1993-09-21 | 1999-03-30 | Synthesis (U.S.A.) | Implant for intervertebral space |
US5716415A (en) * | 1993-10-01 | 1998-02-10 | Acromed Corporation | Spinal implant |
US5397364A (en) * | 1993-10-12 | 1995-03-14 | Danek Medical, Inc. | Anterior interbody fusion device |
US5620458A (en) * | 1994-03-16 | 1997-04-15 | United States Surgical Corporation | Surgical instruments useful for endoscopic spinal procedures |
US5599279A (en) * | 1994-03-16 | 1997-02-04 | Gus J. Slotman | Surgical instruments and method useful for endoscopic spinal procedures |
US5601556A (en) * | 1994-03-18 | 1997-02-11 | Pisharodi; Madhavan | Apparatus for spondylolisthesis reduction |
US5893890A (en) * | 1994-03-18 | 1999-04-13 | Perumala Corporation | Rotating, locking intervertebral disk stabilizer and applicator |
US5609636A (en) * | 1994-05-23 | 1997-03-11 | Spine-Tech, Inc. | Spinal implant |
US5885299A (en) * | 1994-09-15 | 1999-03-23 | Surgical Dynamics, Inc. | Apparatus and method for implant insertion |
US5865846A (en) * | 1994-11-14 | 1999-02-02 | Bryan; Vincent | Human spinal disc prosthesis |
US5860973A (en) * | 1995-02-27 | 1999-01-19 | Michelson; Gary Karlin | Translateral spinal implant |
US5591235A (en) * | 1995-03-15 | 1997-01-07 | Kuslich; Stephen D. | Spinal fixation device |
US6206922B1 (en) * | 1995-03-27 | 2001-03-27 | Sdgi Holdings, Inc. | Methods and instruments for interbody fusion |
US5895437A (en) * | 1995-07-28 | 1999-04-20 | Agip S.P.A. | Method for continuous updating in real time of bidimensional and tridimensional seismic images of a subsurface section using drilling well data |
US5888222A (en) * | 1995-10-16 | 1999-03-30 | Sdgi Holding, Inc. | Intervertebral spacers |
US5888227A (en) * | 1995-10-20 | 1999-03-30 | Synthes (U.S.A.) | Inter-vertebral implant |
US5865845A (en) * | 1996-03-05 | 1999-02-02 | Thalgott; John S. | Prosthetic intervertebral disc |
US5891147A (en) * | 1996-06-25 | 1999-04-06 | Sdgi Holdings, Inc. | Minimally invasive spinal surgical methods & instruments |
US5885292A (en) * | 1996-06-25 | 1999-03-23 | Sdgi Holdings, Inc. | Minimally invasive spinal surgical methods and instruments |
US6503279B1 (en) * | 1996-09-04 | 2003-01-07 | Synthes (Usa) | Intervertebral implant |
US6045580A (en) * | 1996-09-06 | 2000-04-04 | Osteotech, Inc. | Fusion implant device and method of use |
US5895426A (en) * | 1996-09-06 | 1999-04-20 | Osteotech, Inc. | Fusion implant device and method of use |
US5716416A (en) * | 1996-09-10 | 1998-02-10 | Lin; Chih-I | Artificial intervertebral disk and method for implanting the same |
US6019793A (en) * | 1996-10-21 | 2000-02-01 | Synthes | Surgical prosthetic device |
US6190414B1 (en) * | 1996-10-31 | 2001-02-20 | Surgical Dynamics Inc. | Apparatus for fusion of adjacent bone structures |
US5895428A (en) * | 1996-11-01 | 1999-04-20 | Berry; Don | Load bearing spinal joint implant |
US6183471B1 (en) * | 1997-01-02 | 2001-02-06 | St. Francis Medical Technologies, Inc. | Spine distraction implant and method |
US6190387B1 (en) * | 1997-01-02 | 2001-02-20 | St. Francis Medical Technologies, Inc. | Spine distraction implant |
US6514256B2 (en) * | 1997-01-02 | 2003-02-04 | St. Francis Medical Technologies, Inc. | Spine distraction implant and method |
US5876404A (en) * | 1997-01-02 | 1999-03-02 | St. Francis Medical Technologies, Llc | Spine distraction implant and method |
US5860977A (en) * | 1997-01-02 | 1999-01-19 | Saint Francis Medical Technologies, Llc | Spine distraction implant and method |
US6039761A (en) * | 1997-02-12 | 2000-03-21 | Li Medical Technologies, Inc. | Intervertebral spacer and tool and method for emplacement thereof |
US6706070B1 (en) * | 1997-05-01 | 2004-03-16 | Spinal Concepts, Inc. | Multi-variable-height fusion device |
US6045579A (en) * | 1997-05-01 | 2000-04-04 | Spinal Concepts, Inc. | Adjustable height fusion device |
US6042582A (en) * | 1997-05-20 | 2000-03-28 | Ray; Charles D. | Instrumentation and method for facilitating insertion of spinal implant |
US6022376A (en) * | 1997-06-06 | 2000-02-08 | Raymedica, Inc. | Percutaneous prosthetic spinal disc nucleus and method of manufacture |
US5893889A (en) * | 1997-06-20 | 1999-04-13 | Harrington; Michael | Artificial disc |
US6348071B1 (en) * | 1997-10-31 | 2002-02-19 | Depuy Acromed, Inc. | Spinal disc |
US5888226A (en) * | 1997-11-12 | 1999-03-30 | Rogozinski; Chaim | Intervertebral prosthetic disc |
US6176882B1 (en) * | 1998-02-20 | 2001-01-23 | Biedermann Motech Gmbh | Intervertebral implant |
US6179874B1 (en) * | 1998-04-23 | 2001-01-30 | Cauthen Research Group, Inc. | Articulating spinal implant |
US6019792A (en) * | 1998-04-23 | 2000-02-01 | Cauthen Research Group, Inc. | Articulating spinal implant |
US6039763A (en) * | 1998-10-27 | 2000-03-21 | Disc Replacement Technologies, Inc. | Articulating spinal disc prosthesis |
US6193757B1 (en) * | 1998-10-29 | 2001-02-27 | Sdgi Holdings, Inc. | Expandable intervertebral spacers |
US6527804B1 (en) * | 1998-12-11 | 2003-03-04 | Dimso (Distribution Medicale Du Sud-Quest) | Intervertebral disk prosthesis |
US6530933B1 (en) * | 1998-12-31 | 2003-03-11 | Teresa T. Yeung | Methods and devices for fastening bulging or herniated intervertebral discs |
US6342074B1 (en) * | 1999-04-30 | 2002-01-29 | Nathan S. Simpson | Anterior lumbar interbody fusion implant and method for fusing adjacent vertebrae |
US6520996B1 (en) * | 1999-06-04 | 2003-02-18 | Depuy Acromed, Incorporated | Orthopedic implant |
US6530955B2 (en) * | 1999-06-08 | 2003-03-11 | Osteotech, Inc. | Ramp-shaped intervertebral implant |
US6527773B1 (en) * | 1999-10-07 | 2003-03-04 | Osteotech, Inc. | Cervical dowel and insertion tool |
US6524312B2 (en) * | 2000-01-06 | 2003-02-25 | Spinal Concepts, Inc. | Instrument and method for implanting an interbody fusion device |
US6517580B1 (en) * | 2000-03-03 | 2003-02-11 | Scient'x Societe A Responsabilite Limited | Disk prosthesis for cervical vertebrae |
US6682562B2 (en) * | 2000-03-10 | 2004-01-27 | Eurosurgical Sa | Intervertebral disc prosthesis |
US6350283B1 (en) * | 2000-04-19 | 2002-02-26 | Gary K. Michelson | Bone hemi-lumbar interbody spinal implant having an asymmetrical leading end and method of installation thereof |
US6520993B2 (en) * | 2000-12-29 | 2003-02-18 | Depuy Acromed, Inc. | Spinal implant |
US6527806B2 (en) * | 2001-07-16 | 2003-03-04 | Third Millennium Engineering, Llc | Intervertebral spacer device having a spiral wave washer force restoring element |
US6706068B2 (en) * | 2002-04-23 | 2004-03-16 | Bret A. Ferree | Artificial disc replacements with natural kinematics |
US20040030388A1 (en) * | 2002-05-30 | 2004-02-12 | Null William B. | Laminoplasty devices and methods |
US6712852B1 (en) * | 2002-09-30 | 2004-03-30 | Depuy Spine, Inc. | Laminoplasty cage |
Cited By (189)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US8672974B2 (en) | 1997-01-02 | 2014-03-18 | Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc. | Spine distraction implant and method |
US8540751B2 (en) | 1997-01-02 | 2013-09-24 | Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc. | Spine distraction implant and method |
US7666209B2 (en) | 1997-01-02 | 2010-02-23 | Kyphon Sarl | Spine distraction implant and method |
US8568455B2 (en) | 1997-01-02 | 2013-10-29 | Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc. | Spine distraction implant and method |
US20080021561A1 (en) * | 1997-01-02 | 2008-01-24 | Zucherman James F | Spine distraction implant and method |
US8617211B2 (en) | 1997-01-02 | 2013-12-31 | Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc. | Spine distraction implant and method |
US20100150922A1 (en) * | 1998-09-25 | 2010-06-17 | Sciaticon Ab | Use of TNF-alpha Inhibitors for Treating a Nerve Disorder Mediated by Nucleus Pulposus |
US20070104711A1 (en) * | 1998-09-25 | 2007-05-10 | Kjell Olmarker | Use of certain drugs for treating nerve root injury |
US7708995B2 (en) | 1998-09-25 | 2010-05-04 | Sciaticon Ab | Use of TNF-alpha inhibitors for treating a nerve disorder mediated by nucleus pulposus |
US8057792B2 (en) | 1998-09-25 | 2011-11-15 | Sciaticon Ab | Use of an antibody that blocks TNF-alpha activity for treating a nerve disorder mediated by nucleus pulposus |
US20100121456A1 (en) * | 2002-09-10 | 2010-05-13 | Kyphon Sarl | Posterior vertebral support assembly |
US8043336B2 (en) | 2002-09-10 | 2011-10-25 | Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc. | Posterior vertebral support assembly |
US8048117B2 (en) | 2003-05-22 | 2011-11-01 | Kyphon Sarl | Interspinous process implant and method of implantation |
US7588591B2 (en) | 2003-10-30 | 2009-09-15 | Synthesis Usa, Llc | Intervertebral implant |
US20060259037A1 (en) * | 2003-10-30 | 2006-11-16 | Stephan Hartmann | Intervertebral implant |
US7524324B2 (en) * | 2004-04-28 | 2009-04-28 | Kyphon Sarl | System and method for an interspinous process implant as a supplement to a spine stabilization implant |
US9011491B2 (en) | 2004-08-03 | 2015-04-21 | K Spine, Inc. | Facet device and method |
US20060058790A1 (en) * | 2004-08-03 | 2006-03-16 | Carl Allen L | Spinous process reinforcement device and method |
US8043345B2 (en) | 2004-08-03 | 2011-10-25 | K Spine, Inc. | Device and method for correcting a spinal deformity |
US8016860B2 (en) | 2004-08-03 | 2011-09-13 | K Spine, Inc. | Device and method for correcting a spinal deformity |
US8114158B2 (en) | 2004-08-03 | 2012-02-14 | Kspine, Inc. | Facet device and method |
US20060036259A1 (en) * | 2004-08-03 | 2006-02-16 | Carl Allen L | Spine treatment devices and methods |
US8002801B2 (en) | 2004-08-03 | 2011-08-23 | K Spine, Inc. | Adjustable spinal implant device and method |
US7708765B2 (en) | 2004-08-03 | 2010-05-04 | K Spine, Inc. | Spine stabilization device and method |
US9451997B2 (en) | 2004-08-03 | 2016-09-27 | K2M, Inc. | Facet device and method |
US7611526B2 (en) | 2004-08-03 | 2009-11-03 | K Spine, Inc. | Spinous process reinforcement device and method |
US9801666B2 (en) | 2004-08-03 | 2017-10-31 | K2M, Inc. | Device and method for correcting a spinal deformity |
US7658753B2 (en) | 2004-08-03 | 2010-02-09 | K Spine, Inc. | Device and method for correcting a spinal deformity |
US10512490B2 (en) | 2004-08-03 | 2019-12-24 | Albany Medical College | Device and method for correcting a spinal deformity |
US8012209B2 (en) | 2004-09-23 | 2011-09-06 | Kyphon Sarl | Interspinous process implant including a binder, binder aligner and method of implantation |
US7909853B2 (en) * | 2004-09-23 | 2011-03-22 | Kyphon Sarl | Interspinous process implant including a binder and method of implantation |
US8945183B2 (en) | 2004-10-20 | 2015-02-03 | Vertiflex, Inc. | Interspinous process spacer instrument system with deployment indicator |
US8123782B2 (en) | 2004-10-20 | 2012-02-28 | Vertiflex, Inc. | Interspinous spacer |
US10709481B2 (en) | 2004-10-20 | 2020-07-14 | The Board Of Trustees Of The Leland Stanford Junior University | Systems and methods for posterior dynamic stabilization of the spine |
US7763074B2 (en) | 2004-10-20 | 2010-07-27 | The Board Of Trustees Of The Leland Stanford Junior University | Systems and methods for posterior dynamic stabilization of the spine |
US9956011B2 (en) | 2004-10-20 | 2018-05-01 | Vertiflex, Inc. | Interspinous spacer |
US10058358B2 (en) | 2004-10-20 | 2018-08-28 | The Board Of Trustees Of The Leland Stanford Junior University | Systems and methods for posterior dynamic stabilization of the spine |
US10610267B2 (en) | 2004-10-20 | 2020-04-07 | Vertiflex, Inc. | Spacer insertion instrument |
US9877749B2 (en) | 2004-10-20 | 2018-01-30 | The Board Of Trustees Of The Leland Stanford Junior University | Systems and methods for posterior dynamic stabilization of the spine |
US9861398B2 (en) | 2004-10-20 | 2018-01-09 | Vertiflex, Inc. | Interspinous spacer |
US8613747B2 (en) | 2004-10-20 | 2013-12-24 | Vertiflex, Inc. | Spacer insertion instrument |
US8012207B2 (en) | 2004-10-20 | 2011-09-06 | Vertiflex, Inc. | Systems and methods for posterior dynamic stabilization of the spine |
US10835297B2 (en) | 2004-10-20 | 2020-11-17 | Vertiflex, Inc. | Interspinous spacer |
US10080587B2 (en) | 2004-10-20 | 2018-09-25 | Vertiflex, Inc. | Methods for treating a patient's spine |
US9211146B2 (en) | 2004-10-20 | 2015-12-15 | The Board Of Trustees Of The Leland Stanford Junior University | Systems and methods for posterior dynamic stabilization of the spine |
US9039742B2 (en) | 2004-10-20 | 2015-05-26 | The Board Of Trustees Of The Leland Stanford Junior University | Systems and methods for posterior dynamic stabilization of the spine |
US10166047B2 (en) | 2004-10-20 | 2019-01-01 | Vertiflex, Inc. | Interspinous spacer |
US9023084B2 (en) | 2004-10-20 | 2015-05-05 | The Board Of Trustees Of The Leland Stanford Junior University | Systems and methods for stabilizing the motion or adjusting the position of the spine |
US10835295B2 (en) | 2004-10-20 | 2020-11-17 | Vertiflex, Inc. | Interspinous spacer |
US9125692B2 (en) | 2004-10-20 | 2015-09-08 | The Board Of Trustees Of The Leland Stanford Junior University | Systems and methods for posterior dynamic stabilization of the spine |
US9119680B2 (en) | 2004-10-20 | 2015-09-01 | Vertiflex, Inc. | Interspinous spacer |
US9572603B2 (en) | 2004-10-20 | 2017-02-21 | Vertiflex, Inc. | Interspinous spacer |
US9532812B2 (en) | 2004-10-20 | 2017-01-03 | Vertiflex, Inc. | Interspinous spacer |
US10258389B2 (en) | 2004-10-20 | 2019-04-16 | The Board Of Trustees Of The Leland Stanford Junior University | Systems and methods for posterior dynamic stabilization of the spine |
US10278744B2 (en) | 2004-10-20 | 2019-05-07 | The Board Of Trustees Of The Leland Stanford Junior University | Systems and methods for posterior dynamic stabilization of the spine |
US8123807B2 (en) | 2004-10-20 | 2012-02-28 | Vertiflex, Inc. | Systems and methods for posterior dynamic stabilization of the spine |
US8628574B2 (en) | 2004-10-20 | 2014-01-14 | Vertiflex, Inc. | Systems and methods for posterior dynamic stabilization of the spine |
US8128662B2 (en) | 2004-10-20 | 2012-03-06 | Vertiflex, Inc. | Minimally invasive tooling for delivery of interspinous spacer |
US8152837B2 (en) | 2004-10-20 | 2012-04-10 | The Board Of Trustees Of The Leland Stanford Junior University | Systems and methods for posterior dynamic stabilization of the spine |
US10292738B2 (en) | 2004-10-20 | 2019-05-21 | The Board Of Trustees Of The Leland Stanford Junior University | Systems and methods for stabilizing the motion or adjusting the position of the spine |
US8167944B2 (en) | 2004-10-20 | 2012-05-01 | The Board Of Trustees Of The Leland Stanford Junior University | Systems and methods for posterior dynamic stabilization of the spine |
US8900271B2 (en) | 2004-10-20 | 2014-12-02 | The Board Of Trustees Of The Leland Stanford Junior University | Systems and methods for posterior dynamic stabilization of the spine |
US9445843B2 (en) | 2004-10-20 | 2016-09-20 | The Board Of Trustees Of The Leland Stanford Junior University | Systems and methods for posterior dynamic stabilization of the spine |
US8273108B2 (en) | 2004-10-20 | 2012-09-25 | Vertiflex, Inc. | Interspinous spacer |
US8277488B2 (en) | 2004-10-20 | 2012-10-02 | Vertiflex, Inc. | Interspinous spacer |
US8292922B2 (en) | 2004-10-20 | 2012-10-23 | Vertiflex, Inc. | Interspinous spacer |
US8864828B2 (en) | 2004-10-20 | 2014-10-21 | Vertiflex, Inc. | Interspinous spacer |
US8317864B2 (en) | 2004-10-20 | 2012-11-27 | The Board Of Trustees Of The Leland Stanford Junior University | Systems and methods for posterior dynamic stabilization of the spine |
US9155572B2 (en) | 2004-10-20 | 2015-10-13 | Vertiflex, Inc. | Minimally invasive tooling for delivery of interspinous spacer |
US10039576B2 (en) | 2004-10-20 | 2018-08-07 | The Board Of Trustees Of The Leland Stanford Junior University | Systems and methods for posterior dynamic stabilization of the spine |
US9155570B2 (en) | 2004-10-20 | 2015-10-13 | Vertiflex, Inc. | Interspinous spacer |
US9393055B2 (en) | 2004-10-20 | 2016-07-19 | Vertiflex, Inc. | Spacer insertion instrument |
US8409282B2 (en) | 2004-10-20 | 2013-04-02 | Vertiflex, Inc. | Systems and methods for posterior dynamic stabilization of the spine |
US8425559B2 (en) | 2004-10-20 | 2013-04-23 | Vertiflex, Inc. | Systems and methods for posterior dynamic stabilization of the spine |
US9283005B2 (en) | 2004-10-20 | 2016-03-15 | Vertiflex, Inc. | Systems and methods for posterior dynamic stabilization of the spine |
US9161783B2 (en) | 2004-10-20 | 2015-10-20 | Vertiflex, Inc. | Interspinous spacer |
US11076893B2 (en) | 2004-10-20 | 2021-08-03 | Vertiflex, Inc. | Methods for treating a patient's spine |
US9314279B2 (en) | 2004-10-20 | 2016-04-19 | The Board Of Trustees Of The Leland Stanford Junior University | Systems and methods for posterior dynamic stabilization of the spine |
US20060106397A1 (en) * | 2004-10-25 | 2006-05-18 | Lins Robert E | Interspinous distraction devices and associated methods of insertion |
US9055981B2 (en) | 2004-10-25 | 2015-06-16 | Lanx, Inc. | Spinal implants and methods |
US8007517B2 (en) | 2004-10-25 | 2011-08-30 | Lanx, Inc. | Interspinous distraction devices and associated methods of insertion |
US7918875B2 (en) | 2004-10-25 | 2011-04-05 | Lanx, Inc. | Interspinous distraction devices and associated methods of insertion |
US10653456B2 (en) | 2005-02-04 | 2020-05-19 | Vertiflex, Inc. | Interspinous spacer |
US10194956B2 (en) | 2005-04-08 | 2019-02-05 | Paradigm Spine, Llc | Interspinous vertebral and lumbosacral stabilization devices and methods of use |
US8470000B2 (en) | 2005-04-08 | 2013-06-25 | Paradigm Spine, Llc | Interspinous vertebral and lumbosacral stabilization devices and methods of use |
US9402657B2 (en) | 2005-04-08 | 2016-08-02 | Paradigm Spine, Llc | Interspinous vertebral and lumbosacral stabilization devices and methods of use |
US8034079B2 (en) | 2005-04-12 | 2011-10-11 | Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc. | Implants and methods for posterior dynamic stabilization of a spinal motion segment |
US20060271055A1 (en) * | 2005-05-12 | 2006-11-30 | Jeffery Thramann | Spinal stabilization |
US7753938B2 (en) | 2005-08-05 | 2010-07-13 | Synthes Usa, Llc | Apparatus for treating spinal stenosis |
US8870890B2 (en) | 2005-08-05 | 2014-10-28 | DePuy Synthes Products, LLC | Pronged holder for treating spinal stenosis |
US20070032790A1 (en) * | 2005-08-05 | 2007-02-08 | Felix Aschmann | Apparatus for treating spinal stenosis |
US20090012528A1 (en) * | 2005-08-05 | 2009-01-08 | Felix Aschmann | Apparatus for Treating Spinal Stenosis |
US20070161993A1 (en) * | 2005-09-27 | 2007-07-12 | Lowery Gary L | Interspinous vertebral stabilization devices |
US8328848B2 (en) | 2005-09-27 | 2012-12-11 | Paradigm Spine, Llc | Interspinous vertebral stabilization devices |
US10363071B2 (en) | 2005-09-27 | 2019-07-30 | Paradigm Spine, Llc | Interspinous vertebral stabilization devices |
US9173746B2 (en) | 2005-09-27 | 2015-11-03 | Paradigm Spine, Llc | Interspinous vertebral stabilization devices |
US9770271B2 (en) | 2005-10-25 | 2017-09-26 | Zimmer Biomet Spine, Inc. | Spinal implants and methods |
WO2007075375A3 (en) * | 2005-12-20 | 2008-12-18 | Vertiflex Inc | Systems and methods for posterior dynamic stabilization of the spine |
US20090306715A1 (en) * | 2006-02-01 | 2009-12-10 | Jackson Benjamin L | Interspinous process spacer |
US8500778B2 (en) | 2006-02-01 | 2013-08-06 | DePuy Synthes Products, LLC | Interspinous process spacer |
US9011441B2 (en) | 2006-02-17 | 2015-04-21 | Paradigm Spine, L.L.C. | Method and system for performing interspinous space preparation for receiving an implant |
US20070233129A1 (en) * | 2006-02-17 | 2007-10-04 | Rudolf Bertagnoli | Method and system for performing interspinous space preparation for receiving an implant |
US9737316B2 (en) | 2006-02-17 | 2017-08-22 | Paradigm Spine, Llc | Method and system for performing interspinous space preparation for receiving an implant |
US20070270959A1 (en) * | 2006-04-18 | 2007-11-22 | Sdgi Holdings, Inc. | Arthroplasty device |
US8834482B2 (en) | 2006-04-28 | 2014-09-16 | Paradigm Spine, Llc | Instrument system for use with an interspinous implant |
US20080015609A1 (en) * | 2006-04-28 | 2008-01-17 | Trautwein Frank T | Instrument system for use with an interspinous implant |
US8105357B2 (en) | 2006-04-28 | 2012-01-31 | Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc. | Interspinous process brace |
US11160585B2 (en) | 2006-04-28 | 2021-11-02 | Paradigm Spine, Llc | Instrument system for use with an interspinous implant |
US9173973B2 (en) | 2006-07-20 | 2015-11-03 | G. Lawrence Thatcher | Bioabsorbable polymeric composition for a medical device |
US20080161919A1 (en) * | 2006-10-03 | 2008-07-03 | Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc. | Dynamic Devices and Methods for Stabilizing Vertebral Members |
US20080161920A1 (en) * | 2006-10-03 | 2008-07-03 | Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc. | Dynamizing Interbody Implant and Methods for Stabilizing Vertebral Members |
US8092533B2 (en) | 2006-10-03 | 2012-01-10 | Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc. | Dynamic devices and methods for stabilizing vertebral members |
US10588663B2 (en) | 2006-10-18 | 2020-03-17 | Vertiflex, Inc. | Dilator |
US9566086B2 (en) | 2006-10-18 | 2017-02-14 | VeriFlex, Inc. | Dilator |
US11013539B2 (en) | 2006-10-18 | 2021-05-25 | Vertiflex, Inc. | Methods for treating a patient's spine |
US8845726B2 (en) | 2006-10-18 | 2014-09-30 | Vertiflex, Inc. | Dilator |
US11229461B2 (en) | 2006-10-18 | 2022-01-25 | Vertiflex, Inc. | Interspinous spacer |
US9724864B2 (en) | 2006-10-20 | 2017-08-08 | Orbusneich Medical, Inc. | Bioabsorbable polymeric composition and medical device |
US9211205B2 (en) | 2006-10-20 | 2015-12-15 | Orbusneich Medical, Inc. | Bioabsorbable medical device with coating |
US20080228225A1 (en) * | 2006-11-30 | 2008-09-18 | Paradigm Spine, Llc | Interlaminar-Interspinous Vertebral Stabilization System |
US7922750B2 (en) | 2006-11-30 | 2011-04-12 | Paradigm Spine, Llc | Interlaminar-interspinous vertebral stabilization system |
US20080140091A1 (en) * | 2006-12-12 | 2008-06-12 | Dedeyne Patrick G | Minimally invasive suture-based repair of soft tissue |
US9247968B2 (en) | 2007-01-11 | 2016-02-02 | Lanx, Inc. | Spinous process implants and associated methods |
US8241330B2 (en) | 2007-01-11 | 2012-08-14 | Lanx, Inc. | Spinous process implants and associated methods |
US9861400B2 (en) | 2007-01-11 | 2018-01-09 | Zimmer Biomet Spine, Inc. | Spinous process implants and associated methods |
US9743960B2 (en) | 2007-01-11 | 2017-08-29 | Zimmer Biomet Spine, Inc. | Interspinous implants and methods |
US9724136B2 (en) | 2007-01-11 | 2017-08-08 | Zimmer Biomet Spine, Inc. | Spinous process implants and associated methods |
US8075596B2 (en) | 2007-01-12 | 2011-12-13 | Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc. | Spinal prosthesis systems |
US20080172090A1 (en) * | 2007-01-12 | 2008-07-17 | Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc. | Spinal Prosthesis Systems |
US10893893B2 (en) | 2007-02-06 | 2021-01-19 | Pioneer Surgical Technology, Inc. | Intervertebral implant devices and methods for insertion thereof |
US8672976B2 (en) | 2007-02-06 | 2014-03-18 | Pioneer Surgical Technology, Inc. | Intervertebral implant devices and methods for insertion thereof |
US10182852B2 (en) | 2007-02-06 | 2019-01-22 | Pioneer Surgical Technology, Inc. | Intervertebral implant devices and methods for insertion thereof |
US20090012614A1 (en) * | 2007-05-08 | 2009-01-08 | Dixon Robert A | Device and method for tethering a spinal implant |
US20080300686A1 (en) * | 2007-06-04 | 2008-12-04 | K2M, Inc. | Percutaneous interspinous process device and method |
US8070779B2 (en) | 2007-06-04 | 2011-12-06 | K2M, Inc. | Percutaneous interspinous process device and method |
US11246628B2 (en) | 2007-06-06 | 2022-02-15 | K2M, Inc. | Medical device and method to correct deformity |
US10426523B2 (en) | 2007-06-06 | 2019-10-01 | K2M, Inc. | Medical device and method to correct deformity |
US9848917B2 (en) | 2007-06-06 | 2017-12-26 | K2M, Inc. | Medical device and method to correct deformity |
US8162979B2 (en) | 2007-06-06 | 2012-04-24 | K Spine, Inc. | Medical device and method to correct deformity |
US8308767B2 (en) | 2007-09-19 | 2012-11-13 | Pioneer Surgical Technology, Inc. | Interlaminar stabilization system |
US20090163958A1 (en) * | 2007-12-20 | 2009-06-25 | Peter Tarcha | Compositions, devices, systems, and methods for inhibiting an inflammatory response |
US20090204151A1 (en) * | 2008-02-07 | 2009-08-13 | Scott Bracken | Spinal implant device, procedure and system |
US9510865B2 (en) | 2008-11-11 | 2016-12-06 | K2M, Inc. | Growth directed vertebral fixation system with distractible connector(s) and apical control |
US10842536B2 (en) | 2008-11-11 | 2020-11-24 | K2M, Inc. | Growth directed vertebral fixation system with distractible connector(s) and apical control |
US8828058B2 (en) | 2008-11-11 | 2014-09-09 | Kspine, Inc. | Growth directed vertebral fixation system with distractible connector(s) and apical control |
US8652174B2 (en) | 2008-12-22 | 2014-02-18 | DePuy Synthes Products, LLC | Expandable interspinous process spacer |
US8216278B2 (en) | 2008-12-22 | 2012-07-10 | Synthes Usa, Llc | Expandable interspinous process spacer |
US20100222816A1 (en) * | 2008-12-22 | 2010-09-02 | Josef Gabelberger | Expandable interspinous process spacer |
US8114135B2 (en) | 2009-01-16 | 2012-02-14 | Kyphon Sarl | Adjustable surgical cables and methods for treating spinal stenosis |
US8357182B2 (en) | 2009-03-26 | 2013-01-22 | Kspine, Inc. | Alignment system with longitudinal support features |
US9358044B2 (en) | 2009-03-26 | 2016-06-07 | K2M, Inc. | Semi-constrained anchoring system |
US8357183B2 (en) | 2009-03-26 | 2013-01-22 | Kspine, Inc. | Semi-constrained anchoring system |
US11154329B2 (en) | 2009-03-26 | 2021-10-26 | K2M, Inc. | Semi-constrained anchoring system |
US8518086B2 (en) | 2009-03-26 | 2013-08-27 | K Spine, Inc. | Semi-constrained anchoring system |
US9173681B2 (en) | 2009-03-26 | 2015-11-03 | K2M, Inc. | Alignment system with longitudinal support features |
US9827022B2 (en) | 2009-09-15 | 2017-11-28 | K2M, Llc | Growth modulation system |
US10736669B2 (en) | 2009-09-15 | 2020-08-11 | K2M, Inc. | Growth modulation system |
US9168071B2 (en) | 2009-09-15 | 2015-10-27 | K2M, Inc. | Growth modulation system |
US8740948B2 (en) | 2009-12-15 | 2014-06-03 | Vertiflex, Inc. | Spinal spacer for cervical and other vertebra, and associated systems and methods |
US9186186B2 (en) | 2009-12-15 | 2015-11-17 | Vertiflex, Inc. | Spinal spacer for cervical and other vertebra, and associated systems and methods |
US20130012995A1 (en) * | 2009-12-23 | 2013-01-10 | Qspine Limited | Interspinous Implant |
US8979897B2 (en) * | 2009-12-23 | 2015-03-17 | Qspine Limited | Interspinous implant |
US9084639B2 (en) | 2011-02-23 | 2015-07-21 | Farzad Massoudi | Spinal implant device with fusion cage and fixation plates and method of implanting |
US10080588B2 (en) | 2011-02-23 | 2018-09-25 | Farzad Massoudi | Spinal implant device with fixation plates and method of implanting |
US8496689B2 (en) | 2011-02-23 | 2013-07-30 | Farzad Massoudi | Spinal implant device with fusion cage and fixation plates and method of implanting |
US10052138B2 (en) | 2011-02-23 | 2018-08-21 | Farzad Massoudi | Method for implanting spinal implant device with fusion cage |
US8425560B2 (en) | 2011-03-09 | 2013-04-23 | Farzad Massoudi | Spinal implant device with fixation plates and lag screws and method of implanting |
US9408638B2 (en) | 2011-06-03 | 2016-08-09 | K2M, Inc. | Spinal correction system actuators |
US9333009B2 (en) | 2011-06-03 | 2016-05-10 | K2M, Inc. | Spinal correction system actuators |
US9895168B2 (en) | 2011-06-03 | 2018-02-20 | K2M, Inc. | Spinal correction system actuators |
US10675062B2 (en) | 2011-06-03 | 2020-06-09 | K2M, Inc. | Spinal correction system actuators |
US11812923B2 (en) | 2011-10-07 | 2023-11-14 | Alan Villavicencio | Spinal fixation device |
US8920472B2 (en) | 2011-11-16 | 2014-12-30 | Kspine, Inc. | Spinal correction and secondary stabilization |
US10342581B2 (en) | 2011-11-16 | 2019-07-09 | K2M, Inc. | System and method for spinal correction |
US9468468B2 (en) | 2011-11-16 | 2016-10-18 | K2M, Inc. | Transverse connector for spinal stabilization system |
US9468469B2 (en) | 2011-11-16 | 2016-10-18 | K2M, Inc. | Transverse coupler adjuster spinal correction systems and methods |
US10702311B2 (en) | 2011-11-16 | 2020-07-07 | K2M, Inc. | Spinal correction and secondary stabilization |
US9113959B2 (en) | 2011-11-16 | 2015-08-25 | K2M, Inc. | Spinal correction and secondary stabilization |
US9827017B2 (en) | 2011-11-16 | 2017-11-28 | K2M, Inc. | Spinal correction and secondary stabilization |
US11013538B2 (en) | 2011-11-16 | 2021-05-25 | K2M, Inc. | System and method for spinal correction |
US9675303B2 (en) | 2013-03-15 | 2017-06-13 | Vertiflex, Inc. | Visualization systems, instruments and methods of using the same in spinal decompression procedures |
US9468471B2 (en) | 2013-09-17 | 2016-10-18 | K2M, Inc. | Transverse coupler adjuster spinal correction systems and methods |
US11357489B2 (en) | 2014-05-07 | 2022-06-14 | Vertiflex, Inc. | Spinal nerve decompression systems, dilation systems, and methods of using the same |
US10524772B2 (en) | 2014-05-07 | 2020-01-07 | Vertiflex, Inc. | Spinal nerve decompression systems, dilation systems, and methods of using the same |
US20170112959A1 (en) * | 2015-10-12 | 2017-04-27 | Erik Erbe | Novel osteogenic and angiogenic implant material |
US10485897B2 (en) * | 2015-10-12 | 2019-11-26 | Erik Erbe | Osteogenic and angiogenic implant material |
US11147682B2 (en) | 2017-09-08 | 2021-10-19 | Pioneer Surgical Technology, Inc. | Intervertebral implants, instruments, and methods |
USD907771S1 (en) | 2017-10-09 | 2021-01-12 | Pioneer Surgical Technology, Inc. | Intervertebral implant |
USD968613S1 (en) | 2017-10-09 | 2022-11-01 | Pioneer Surgical Technology, Inc. | Intervertebral implant |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
JP2007514478A (en) | 2007-06-07 |
EP1694256A2 (en) | 2006-08-30 |
EP1694256A4 (en) | 2011-03-09 |
WO2005055868A2 (en) | 2005-06-23 |
WO2005055868A3 (en) | 2005-10-27 |
US20050196420A1 (en) | 2005-09-08 |
US7481839B2 (en) | 2009-01-27 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US7481839B2 (en) | Bioresorbable interspinous process implant for use with intervertebral disk remediation or replacement implants and procedures | |
Pina et al. | Bioresorbable plates and screws for clinical applications: a review | |
Waris et al. | Bioabsorbable fixation devices in trauma and bone surgery: current clinical standing | |
JP7053561B2 (en) | Device for variable fixation of bone fragments | |
US20040210218A1 (en) | Vertebral implant for bone fixation or interbody use | |
Kontakis et al. | Bioabsorbable materials in orthopaedics | |
US20050149030A1 (en) | Facet joint fixation system | |
US20130245703A1 (en) | Method and apparatus for sacroiliac joint fixation | |
CN1849099A (en) | Implants formed of shape memory polymeric material for spinal fixation | |
WO2007044391A2 (en) | Bone alignment implant and method of use | |
AU2003261286A1 (en) | Method and apparatus for spinal fixation | |
KR20060115603A (en) | Plate, its use, system and plate attachment method | |
US20190357950A1 (en) | Surgical implant system for treating fifth metatarsal jones fractures | |
Serlo, Outi I. Kaarela, Hilkka H. Peltoniemi, Juhani Merikanto, Nureddin A. Ashammakhi, Kai Lassila, Timo Pohjonen, Pertti Törmälä, Timo H. Waris | Use of self-reinforced polylactide osteosynthesis devices in craniofacial surgery: a long-term follow-up study | |
Habal et al. | Key points in the fixation of the craniofacial skeleton with absorbable biomaterial | |
Spoliti | Glenoid osteolysis after arthroscopic labrum repair with a bioabsorbable suture anchor | |
Cahill et al. | Suitability of bioresorbable cages for anterior cervical fusion | |
Holmes et al. | MacroPore resorbable devices in craniofacial surgery | |
US11224465B2 (en) | Surgical methods for the treatment of spinal stenosis | |
Alexander et al. | Applications of a resorbable interbody spacer via a posterior lumbar interbody fusion technique | |
Alexander et al. | Applications of a resorbable interbody spacer in posterior lumbar interbody fusion | |
JP2007537834A (en) | Functional spinal unit prosthesis | |
US20180078289A9 (en) | Laminoplasty device | |
Maitra et al. | Biodegradable implants | |
AU2003257057B2 (en) | Resorbable thin membranes |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: ST. FRANCIS MEDICAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC., CALIFORNIA Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:ZUCHERMAN, JAMES F.;HSU, KEN Y.;REEL/FRAME:018815/0508 Effective date: 20061203 |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT,WAS Free format text: SECURITY AGREEMENT;ASSIGNOR:ST. FRANCIS MEDICAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC.;REEL/FRAME:018911/0427 Effective date: 20070118 Owner name: BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT, WA Free format text: SECURITY AGREEMENT;ASSIGNOR:ST. FRANCIS MEDICAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC.;REEL/FRAME:018911/0427 Effective date: 20070118 |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: KYPHON INC., CALIFORNIA Free format text: MERGER;ASSIGNOR:ST. FRANCIS MEDICAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC.;REEL/FRAME:020393/0260 Effective date: 20071128 Owner name: KYPHON INC.,CALIFORNIA Free format text: MERGER;ASSIGNOR:ST. FRANCIS MEDICAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC.;REEL/FRAME:020393/0260 Effective date: 20071128 |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: KYPHON, INC., CALIFORNIA Free format text: TERMINATION/RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.;REEL/FRAME:020679/0107 Effective date: 20071101 Owner name: KYPHON, INC.,CALIFORNIA Free format text: TERMINATION/RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.;REEL/FRAME:020679/0107 Effective date: 20071101 |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: MEDTRONIC SPINE LLC, CALIFORNIA Free format text: CHANGE OF NAME;ASSIGNOR:KYPHON INC;REEL/FRAME:020993/0042 Effective date: 20080118 Owner name: MEDTRONIC SPINE LLC,CALIFORNIA Free format text: CHANGE OF NAME;ASSIGNOR:KYPHON INC;REEL/FRAME:020993/0042 Effective date: 20080118 |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: KYPHON SARL, SWITZERLAND Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:MEDTRONIC SPINE LLC;REEL/FRAME:021070/0278 Effective date: 20080325 Owner name: KYPHON SARL,SWITZERLAND Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:MEDTRONIC SPINE LLC;REEL/FRAME:021070/0278 Effective date: 20080325 |
|
STCB | Information on status: application discontinuation |
Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION |