Recherche Images Maps Play YouTube Actualités Gmail Drive Plus »
Connexion
Les utilisateurs de lecteurs d'écran peuvent cliquer sur ce lien pour activer le mode d'accessibilité. Celui-ci propose les mêmes fonctionnalités principales, mais il est optimisé pour votre lecteur d'écran.

Brevets

  1. Recherche avancée dans les brevets
Numéro de publicationUS20050240270 A1
Type de publicationDemande
Numéro de demandeUS 11/124,777
Date de publication27 oct. 2005
Date de dépôt9 mai 2005
Date de priorité6 mars 2003
Autre référence de publicationCA2518068A1, CA2518068C, CA2653994A1, CA2653994C, CA2802827A1, EP1599150A1, EP1599150A4, US6896676, US6908484, US6972037, US6972038, US6994728, US6994729, US6997954, US6997955, US7198643, US7226452, US7618439, US7637911, US7641654, US7641665, US7648511, US7674292, US7708780, US8109979, US8231628, US8435297, US8936640, US8961608, US9028552, US9603716, US20040176772, US20040176773, US20040176774, US20040176776, US20040176777, US20040176778, US20040176843, US20040176844, US20040176845, US20040176846, US20040176847, US20040176848, US20040176849, US20040176850, US20040176851, US20040176852, US20040220590, US20050071013, US20050240271, US20050240272, US20100070040, US20100076506, US20100087870, US20130226299, US20150164651, US20160120658, US20170156887, WO2004080349A1
Numéro de publication11124777, 124777, US 2005/0240270 A1, US 2005/240270 A1, US 20050240270 A1, US 20050240270A1, US 2005240270 A1, US 2005240270A1, US-A1-20050240270, US-A1-2005240270, US2005/0240270A1, US2005/240270A1, US20050240270 A1, US20050240270A1, US2005240270 A1, US2005240270A1
InventeursRafail Zubok, Antonio Valdevit, Michael Dudasik, Joseph Errico
Cessionnaire d'origineSpinecore, Inc.
Exporter la citationBiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan
Liens externes: USPTO, Cession USPTO, Espacenet
Cervical disc replacement
US 20050240270 A1
Résumé
A method for replacing at least a portion of an intervertebral disc in a spinal column includes: removing the portion of the intervertebral disc from the spinal column; and inserting an apparatus for replacing the portion of the intervertebral disc into an intervertebral disc space defined substantially between adjacent vertebral bones of the spinal column, and positioning the apparatus between the vertebral bones, wherein the apparatus is operable to permit the adjacent vertebral bones to articulate relative to one another about at least one of: (i) a first center of rotation for at least one of flexion and extension that is located outside the intervertebral disc space, and (ii) a second center of rotation for lateral bending that is located outside the intervertebral disc space.
Images(4)
Previous page
Next page
Revendications(27)
1. An intervertebral implant comprising:
a first member having a first articulation surface that is defined by a plurality of concave arcs each having a respective radius of curvature about a first axis, and a plurality of convex arcs each having a respective radius of curvature about a second axis substantially perpendicular to the first axis; and
a second member having a second articulation surface that is defined by a plurality of convex arcs each having a radius of curvature about a third axis, and a plurality of concave arcs each having a radius of curvature about a fourth axis substantially perpendicular to the third axis,
each of the plurality of concave arcs of the first articulation surface opposing one of the plurality of convex arcs of the second articulation surface and each of the concave arcs of the second articulation surface opposing on of the convex arcs of the first articulation surface, the radius of curvature of each of the concave arcs of the first articulation surface being greater than the radius of curvature of the opposing convex arc of the second articulation surface,
wherein the first member has a first center of rotation that remains below the articulation surfaces during flexion/extension and a second center of rotation that remains above the articulation surfaces during lateral bending.
2. The intervertebral implant of claim 1, wherein the entirety of said first articulation surface is saddle-shaped, and the entirety of said second articulation surface is saddle-shaped.
3. The intervertebral implant of claim 2, wherein said first articulation surface includes a single concave surface and a single convex surface, and said second articulation surface includes a single concave surface and a single convex surface.
4. The intervertebral implant of claim 3, wherein said single concave surface of said first articulation surface engages said single convex surface of said second articulation surface, and said single convex surface of said first articulation surface engages said single concave surface of said second articulation surface.
5. The intervertebral implant of claim 1, wherein said first articulation surface includes continuous concave and convex surfaces extending between outer edges of said first articulation surface, and said second articulation surface includes continuous concave and convex surfaces extending between outer edges of said second articulation surface.
6. The intervertebral implant of claim 1, wherein the concave arcs of the second articulation surface are greater than the radius of curvature of the opposing convex arc of the first articulation surface
7. The intervertebral implant of claim 1, wherein said first and second members further include means for engaging a vertebral body.
8. The intervertebral implant of claim 7, wherein said means for engaging a vertebral body is selected from the group consisting of flanges, keels and spikes.
9. The intervertebral implant of claim 1, wherein rotation of said first member with respect to said second member occurs through at least a range of angles without said first and second members moving away from one another.
10. The intervertebral implant of claim 9, wherein said range of angles is approximately plus/minus three degrees from a resting position.
11. An intervertebral implant comprising:
a first member having a first articulation surface; and
a second member having a second articulation surface,
wherein each of the first and second articulation surfaces has a toroidal saddle shaped surface, and the articulation surfaces are adapted to engage one another during at least one of flexion/extension and lateral bending, wherein the engaging articulation surfaces include opposing constant radius of curvature surfaces that are non-congruent.
12. The intervertebral implant of claim 11, wherein rotation of said first member with respect to said second member occurs through at least a range of angles without said first and second members moving away from one another.
13. The intervertebral implant of claim 12, wherein said range of angles is approximately plus/minus three degrees from a resting position.
14. The intervertebral implant of claim 11, wherein said first articulation surface includes continuous concave and convex surfaces extending between outer edges of said first articulation surface, and said second articulation surface includes continuous concave and convex surfaces extending between outer edges of said second articulation surface.
15. The intervertebral implant of claim 11, wherein said first articulation surface is defined by a concave arc having a substantially constant radius of curvature A about a first axis, and a convex arc having a substantially constant radius of curvature B about a second axis perpendicular to the first axis, and said second articulation surface is defined by a convex arc having a substantially constant radius of curvature C about a third axis, and a concave arc having a substantially constant radius of curvature D about a fourth axis perpendicular to the third axis.
16. The intervertebral implant of claim 15, wherein said radius of curvature A is greater than said radius of curvature C and said radius of curvature B is less than said radius of curvature D.
17. The intervertebral implant of claim 15, wherein at least one of: (i) said first and third axes are coaxial; and (ii) said second and fourth axes are coaxial.
18. The intervertebral implant of claim 15, wherein at least one of: (i) said first and third axes are coplanar; and (ii) said second and fourth axes are coplanar.
19. The intervertebral implant of claim 11, wherein the first implant portion has a center of rotation that remains below said articulation surfaces during flexion/extension and that remains above said articulation surfaces during lateral bending.
20. The intervertebral implant of claim 11, wherein said first and second member further include means for engaging a vertebral body.
21. The intervertebral implant of claim 20, wherein said means for engaging a vertebral body is selected from the group consisting of flanges, keels and spikes.
22. An intervertebral implant comprising:
a first member having a first articulating surface, the entirety of the first articulating surface being a single saddle surface that is defined by a concave arc having a substantially constant radius of curvature A about a first axis perpendicular to leading and trailing ends of the first member and convex arc having a substantially constant radius of curvature B about a first axis perpendicular to lateral sides of the first member; and
a second member having a second articulating surface in contact with the first articulating surface, the entirety of the second articulating surface being a single saddle surface that is defined by a convex arc having a substantially constant radius of curvature C about a first axis perpendicular to leading and trailing ends of the second member and concave arc having a substantially constant radius of curvature D about a second axis perpendicular to lateral sides of the second member, wherein the constant radius of curvature A is non-congruent with the constant radius of curvature C and the constant radius of curvature B is non-congruent with the radius of curvature D;
the first and second members are operable to articulate relative to one another about at least one of: (i) a first center of rotation for at least one of flexion and extension that is located above the first and second articulating surfaces, and (ii) a second center of rotation for lateral bending that is located below the first and second articulating surfaces.
23. The intervertebral implant of claim 22, wherein rotation of said first member with respect to said second member occurs through at least a range of angles without said first and second members moving away from one another.
24. The intervertebral implant of claim 23, wherein said range of angles is approximately plus/minus three degrees from a resting position.
25. An intervertebral implant comprising:
first and second members have opposing first and second articulating surfaces that are in contact with one another, the entirety of the first articulating surface being a single saddle surface that is defined by a concave arc having a substantially constant radius of curvature A about a first axis perpendicular to an axis passing through leading and trailing ends of the first member and a convex arc having a substantially constant radius of curvature B about a first axis perpendicular to an axis passing through lateral ends of the first member, the entirety of the second articulating surface being a single saddle surface that is defined by a convex arc having a substantially constant radius of curvature C about a first axis perpendicular to an axis passing through leading and trailing ends of the second member and a concave arc having a substantially constant radius of curvature D about a second axis perpendicular to an axis passing through lateral ends of the second member, the constant radius of curvature A being non-congruent with the constant radius of curvature C and the constant radius of curvature B being non-congruent with the constant radius of curvature D,
wherein the first and second members are adapted to articulate relative to one another about at least one of: (i) a first center of rotation for at least one of flexion and extension that is located above the first and second articulating surfaces, and (ii) a second center of rotation for lateral bending that is located below the first and second articulating surfaces.
26. The intervertebral implant of claim 25, wherein rotation of said first member with respect to said second member occurs through at least a range of angles without said first and second members moving away from one another.
27. The intervertebral implant of claim 26, wherein said range of angles is approximately plus/minus three degrees from a resting position.
Description
    CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS
  • [0001]
    This application is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 10/382,702, filed on Mar. 6, 2003, the disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference.
  • BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
  • [0002]
    The present invention is directed to a cervical joint replacement implant and more particularly to a cervical intervertebral disc prosthesis having opposing constant radii saddle shaped articulating surfaces.
  • [0003]
    The structure of the intervertebral disc disposed between the cervical bones in the human spine comprises a peripheral fibrous shroud (the annulus) which circumscribes a spheroid of flexibly deformable material (the nucleus). The nucleus comprises a hydrophilic, elastomeric cartilaginous substance that cushions and supports the separation between the bones while also permitting articulation of the two vertebral bones relative to one another to the extent such articulation is allowed by the other soft tissue and bony structures surrounding the disc. The additional bony structures that define pathways of motion in various modes include the posterior joints (the facets) and the lateral intervertebral joints (the unco-vertebral joints). Soft tissue components, such as ligaments and tendons, constrain the overall segmental motion as well.
  • [0004]
    Traumatic, genetic, and long term wearing phenomena contribute to the degeneration of the nucleus in the human spine. This degeneration of this critical disc material, from the hydrated, elastomeric material that supports the separation and flexibility of the vertebral bones, to a flattened and inflexible state, has profound effects on the mobility (instability and limited ranges of appropriate motion) of the segment, and can cause significant pain to the individual suffering from the condition. Although the specific causes of pain in patients suffering from degenerative disc disease of the cervical spine have not been definitively established, it has been recognized that pain may be the result of neurological implications (nerve fibers being compressed) and/or the subsequent degeneration of the surrounding tissues (the arthritic degeneration of the facet joints) as a result of their being overloaded.
  • [0005]
    Traditionally, the treatment of choice for physicians caring for patients who suffer from significant degeneration of the cervical intervertebral disc is to remove some, or all, of the damaged disc. In instances in which a sufficient portion of the intervertebral disc material is removed, or in which much of the necessary spacing between the vertebrae has been lost (significant subsidence), restoration of the intervertebral separation is required.
  • [0006]
    Unfortunately, until the advent of spine arthroplasty devices, the only methods known to surgeons to maintain the necessary disc height necessitated the immobilization of the segment. Immobilization is generally achieved by attaching metal plates to the anterior or posterior elements of the cervical spine, and the insertion of some osteoconductive material (autograft, allograft, or other porous material) between the adjacent vertebrae of the segment. This immobilization and insertion of osteoconductive material has been utilized in pursuit of a fusion of the bones, which is a procedure carried out on tens of thousands of pain suffering patients per year.
  • [0007]
    This sacrifice of mobility at the immobilized, or fused, segment, however, is not without consequences. It was traditionally held that the patient's surrounding joint segments would accommodate any additional articulation demanded of them during normal motion by virtue of the fused segment's immobility. While this is true over the short-term (provided only one, or at most two, segments have been fused), the effects of this increased range of articulation demanded of these adjacent segments has recently become a concern. Specifically, an increase in the frequency of returning patients who suffer from degeneration at adjacent levels has been reported.
  • [0008]
    Whether this increase in adjacent level deterioration is truly associated with rigid fusion, or if it is simply a matter of the individual patient's predisposition to degeneration is unknown. Either way, however, it is clear that a progressive fusion of a long sequence of vertebrae is undesirable from the perspective of the patient's quality of life as well as from the perspective of pushing a patient to undergo multiple operative procedures.
  • [0009]
    While spine arthroplasty has been developing in theory over the past several decades, and has even seen a number of early attempts in the lumbar spine show promising results, it is only recently that arthoplasty of the spine has become a truly realizable promise. The field of spine arthroplasty has several classes of devices. The most popular among these are: (a) the nucleus replacements, which are characterized by a flexible container filled with an elastomeric material that can mimic the healthy nucleus; and (b) the total disc replacements, which are designed with rigid endplates which house a mechanical articulating structure that attempts to mimic and promote the healthy segmental motion.
  • [0010]
    Among these solutions, the total disc replacements have begun to be regarded as the most probable long-term treatments for patients having moderate to severe lumbar disc degeneration. In the cervical spine, it is likely that these mechanical solutions will also become the treatment of choice. At present, there are two devices being tested clinically in humans for the indication of cervical disc degeneration. The first of these is the Bryan disc, disclosed in part in U.S. Pat. No. 6,001,130. The Bryan disc is comprised of a resilient nucleus body disposed in between concaval-covex upper and lower elements that retain the nucleus between adjacent vertebral bodies in the spine. The concaval-convex elements are L-shaped supports that have anterior wings that accept bones screws for securing to the adjacent vertebral bodies.
  • [0011]
    The second of these devices being clinically tested is the Bristol disc, disclosed substantially in U.S. Pat. No. 6,113,637. The Bristol disc is comprised of two L-shaped elements, with corresponding ones of the legs of each element being interposed between the vertebrae and in opposition to one another. The other of the two legs are disposed outside of the intervertebral space and include screw holes through which the elements may be secured to the corresponding vertebra; the superior element being secured to the upper vertebral body and the inferior element being attached to the lower vertebral body. The opposing portions of each of the elements comprise the articulating surfaces that include an elliptical channel formed in the lower element and a convex hemispherical structure disposed in the channel.
  • [0012]
    As is evident from the above descriptions, the centers of rotation for both of these devices, which are being clinically tested in human subjects, is disposed at some point in the disc space. More particularly with respect to the Bryan disc, the center of rotation is maintained at a central portion of the nucleus, and hence in the center of the disc space. The Bristol disc, as a function of its elongated channel (its elongated axis being oriented along the anterior to posterior direction), has a moving center of rotation which is, at all times maintained within the disc space at the rotational center of the hemispherical ball (near the top of the upper element).
  • [0013]
    Other aspects, features and advantages of the present invention not already evident will become evident from the description herein taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings.
  • SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
  • [0014]
    The present invention provides an articulating joint implant that includes a pair of opposing upper and lower elements having nested articulation surfaces providing a center of rotation of the implant above the adjacent vertebral body endplate surfaces in one mode of motion (e.g., lateral bending) and a center of rotation of the implant below those surfaces in another mode of motion (e.g., flexion/extension), and that further permit axial rotation of the opposing elements relative to one another (for example, about an axis such as, for example, a longitudinal axis, for example, of the spinal column)) through a range of angles without causing them to move in directions that are directed away from one another (for example, in opposing directions along the axis of axial rotation) within that range. In preferred embodiments, the articulation surfaces further cause such opposite (or otherwise directed away from one another) movement of the opposing elements beyond that range.
  • [0015]
    More particularly, the present invention contemplates that with regard to the cervical anatomy, a device that maintains a center of rotation, moving or otherwise, within the disc space is inappropriate and fails to properly support healthy motion. Specifically, the cervical joint comprises five separate articulating elements: the facet joints in the posterior of the segment; the lateral unco-vertebral joints; and the nucleus in the intervertebral space. It is contemplated by the present invention that a track defined by the cervical facets falls along the planes between the inferior surface of the upper facets and the superior surface of the lower facets, and that this plane extends upwardly and forward, forcing the overall joint to pivot around a center of rotation that resides in the lower vertebral bone in flexion/extension articulation.
  • [0016]
    Conversely, it is contemplated by the present invention that in lateral bending the unco-vertebral joints influence the track of motion. Specifically, the unco-vertebral joints are formed at the lateral edges of the intervertebral space and are defined by a pair of upwardly extending surfaces of the inferior vertebral endplate and the corresponding surfaces of the superior bony endplate. It is contemplated by the present invention that this U-shaped configuration guides the segment into a rotation about a center within the superior vertebral bone during lateral bending.
  • [0017]
    Finally, it is contemplated by the present invention that during axial rotation of the adjacent vertebral bones of the cervical segment relative to one another about the longitudinal axis of the spinal column, the opposing bones do not simply axially rotate relative to one another for more than a few degrees, but rather follow the coupled influences of the unco-vertebral joints and the nucleus, and that this coupled motion vertically separates the opposing bones of the facet joints as the rotation continues, thus freeing the bones to rotate farther that would otherwise be permitted if the facets locked together (as is often seen as a symptom of degenerative cervical disease).
  • [0018]
    Both the Bryan and Bristol discs described above do provide distraction and maintenance of intervertebral disc height, and thereby provide immediate and short-term relief from pain. However, it should be understood, in light of the above described anatomy as contemplated by the present invention, that neither provides for proper anatomical motion because their respective centers of rotation are located within the disc space. Thus, neither will afford significant motion preservation, and patients with these devices implanted in their necks will find no significant mobility at the implanted segment. This may lead to spontaneous fusions, long term facet deterioration, and/or accelerated adjacent level degeneration.
  • [0019]
    The constraints placed on the prosthesis by the above-described anatomy are considerable. To provide an implant having a pair of articulation surfaces that provide a center of rotation of the implant above the surfaces in one mode of motion (lateral bending) and a center of rotation of the implant below the surfaces in another mode of motion (flexion/extension), that further permit the surfaces to axially rotate relative to one another about a longitudinal axis of the spinal column through a range of angles without causing movement of the surfaces in opposing directions along the longitudinal axis of the spinal column, and that further cause such movement (and accordingly a vertical separation of the facet joints) beyond that range is a difficult engineering task. The present invention contemplates that a saddle joint provides a geometric approach to the task.
  • [0020]
    The solution to this problem, however, is not open to just any saddle joint configuration. U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,405,400 and 5,645,605 describe saddle joints utilized for prosthetic thumb joints. More particularly, U.S. Pat. No. 5,405,400 (“Linscheid”) discloses an artificial thumb joint comprising a pair of surfaces that are nesting hyperbolic paraboloids. A hyperbolic paraboloid is a surface defined by a first specific geometric form (the hyperbola) that is swept along a second geometric form (the parabola) that is perpendicular to the first form, and which first and second forms are opposite in the direction of their convexities. A common feature of both hyperbolae and parabolae is that neither has a constant radius of curvature along its extent. Constant radii of curvature are necessary for a pair of surfaces to smoothly flow over one another. Accordingly, the nesting hyperbolic paraboloids set forth in the reference are, therefore, not capable of any smooth articulation. Any attempted articulation causes the two surfaces to immediately move in opposing directions. Stated more simply, nesting hyperbolic paraboloids have continuously changing centers of rotation (by the nature of the geometric forms selected). The present invention contemplates that the cervical joint anatomy enables smooth articulation in two modes of motion (lateral bending and flexion/extension), and also smooth relative axial rotation about the longitudinal axis of the spinal column through a small range of angles. It is understood by the present invention that the vertical separation motion of the natural cervical joint does not occur immediately, but rather occurs only outside that small angular range of relative axial rotation. Thus, the present invention contemplates that the nesting hyperbolic paraboloids disclosed by Linscheid are inappropriate for use in the cervical joint.
  • [0021]
    U.S. Pat. No. 5,645,605 (“Klawitter”) discloses an alternate form of a saddle surface, again for use in an artificial thumb joint that comprises a pair of nesting toroidal surfaces. Toroidal surfaces are defined by an arc of one circle being swept along an arc of another, again having opposing convexities. As circles have constant radii of curvatures, it is possible with these surfaces to have smooth motion in two perpendicular planes. More particularly, if the corresponding radii of curvature are approximately equivalent, the two surfaces may nest and articulate in flexion/extension and lateral bending smoothly, without causing the surfaces to move in opposing directions upon an attempted articulation. However, Klawitter teaches that these toroidal surfaces should have the same radii of curvature, inasmuch as it is a necessity that axial rotational motion of the joint be inhibited, or if it is permitted to occur, it should cause an immediate axial distraction of the joint. As explained above with regard to the saddle joint in Linscheid, this elimination of the capacity of the surfaces to axially rotate relative to one another for even a small range of angles prevents such a design from being effectively used in a cervical disc application.
  • [0022]
    In order for two nesting toroidal saddles to rotate within the same plane, each of the concave radii of the surfaces must be greater than the radius of its nested convex surface. An artificial cervical joint that provides a center of rotation in the vertebral bone below during flexion/extension and in the vertebral bone above during lateral bending and has the capacity to axially rotate within a small range of angles prior to causing oppositely directed movement of the surfaces requires nesting surfaces with such a configuration.
  • [0023]
    The present invention, therefore, provides an articulating joint implant for use in the cervical spine, including a first (e.g., upper) element and a second (e.g., lower) element, each having an outwardly facing vertebral body contact surface, and each having an inwardly facing articulation surface. The elements are disposed with the articulation surfaces nested against one another, and the vertebral body contact surfaces facing away from one another. When the implant is disposed in an intervertebral disc space in a cervical spine, in this configuration and with the vertebral body contact surfaces engaged with respective adjacent vertebral body endplates, the implant enables the adjacent vertebral bones to move relative to one another in accordance with proper anatomical motion.
  • [0024]
    Preferably, each of the elements has at least one long-term fixation structure (e.g., a flange) having at least one feature (e.g., a through hole) for securing the element to an adjacent vertebral body. For example, the upper element has an anterior flange that extends upwardly and has two through holes, each of which accepts a bone screw. And, for example, the lower element has an anterior flange that extends downwardly and has one through hole that accepts a bone screw. Further preferably, each of the elements has at least one short-term fixation structure (e.g., spikes on the outwardly directed vertebral body contact surface) for securing the element to an adjacent vertebral body endplate.
  • [0025]
    Further preferably, each of the outwardly directed vertebral body contact surfaces is shaped to conform to the endplate of an adjacent vertebral body against which it is to be positioned. For example, vertebral body contact surface of the upper element is curvate (to match the anatomy of the superior vertebral body endplate) and the vertebral body contact surface of the lower element is flat (to match the anatomy of the inferior vertebral body endplate). Further preferably, each vertebral body contact surface has an osteoinductive or osteoconductive feature, such as, for example, porous or rough areas.
  • [0026]
    The longitudinally inwardly directed articulation surface of the upper element forms a constant radii saddle-shaped articulation surface. More particularly, the saddle surface is defined by a concave arc that is swept perpendicular to and along a convex arc. The articulation surface has a cross-section in one plane that forms a concave arc, and a cross-section in another plane (perpendicular to that plane) that forms a convex arc. The concave arc has a respective constant radius of curvature about an axis perpendicular to the one plane. The convex arc has a respective constant radius of curvature about an axis perpendicular to the other plane.
  • [0027]
    In a preferred embodiment, the concave arc has a constant radius of curvature A about an axis perpendicular to the anterior-posterior plane, and the convex arc has a constant radius of curvature B about an axis perpendicular to the lateral plane. Preferably, radius A is less than radius B.
  • [0028]
    The longitudinally inwardly directed articulation surface of the lower element also forms a constant radii saddle-shaped articulation surface. More particularly, the saddle surface is defined by a convex arc that is swept perpendicular to and along a concave arc. The articulation surface has a cross-section in one plane that forms a convex arc, and a cross-section in another plane (perpendicular to that plane) that forms a concave arc. The convex arc has a respective constant radius of curvature about an axis perpendicular to the one plane. The concave arc has a respective constant radius of curvature about an axis perpendicular to the other plane.
  • [0029]
    In a preferred embodiment, the convex arc has a constant radius of curvature C about an axis perpendicular to the anterior-posterior plane, and the concave arc has a constant radius of curvature D about an axis perpendicular to the lateral plane. Preferably, radius C is less than radius D.
  • [0030]
    The constant radii saddle shaped articulation surfaces are configured and sized to be nestable against one another and articulatable against one another, to enable adjacent vertebral bones (against which the upper and lower elements are respectively disposed in the intervertebral space) to articulate in flexion, extension, and lateral bending. More particularly, the artificial disc implant of the present invention is assembled by disposing the upper and lower elements such that the vertebral body contact surfaces are directed away from one another, and the articulation surfaces are nested against one another such that the concave arcs accommodates the convex arcs.
  • [0031]
    Accordingly, movement of the adjacent vertebral bones relative to one another is permitted by the movement of the upper and lower elements relative to one another. In flexion and extension, the concave arcs of the upper element ride on the convex arcs of the lower element about a center of rotation below the articulation surfaces. In lateral bending, the concave arcs of the lower element ride on the convex arcs of the upper element about a center of rotation above the articulation surfaces. During these articulations, the elements are maintained at constant relative distraction positions, i.e., the elements do not move in directions that are directed away from one another (for example, do not move in opposing axial directions from one another (e.g., along a longitudinal axis of the spine)). Accordingly, the present invention provides a pair of articulation surfaces that have a center of rotation above the surfaces in one mode of motion (lateral bending), and below the surfaces in another (flexion/extension), consistent in these regards with a natural cervical intervertebral joint. Preferably, the articulation surfaces are sized and configured so that the respective ranges of angles through which flexion/extension and lateral bending can be experienced are equal to or greater than the respective normal physiologic ranges for such movements in the cervical spine.
  • [0032]
    It is preferable that, in addition to the flexion, extension, and lateral bending motions described above, the adjacent vertebral bones be permitted by the artificial disc implant to axially rotate relative to one another (e.g., about the longitudinal axis of the spinal column), through a small range of angles, without moving in opposite (or otherwise directed away from one another) directions (e.g., along the longitudinal axis) within that range, and then to engage in such opposite (or otherwise directed away from one another) movement once that range is exceeded. Preferably, the articulation surfaces 204, 304 are accordingly configured and sized to permit such movements. In a preferred configuration, the constant radius of curvature A is larger than the constant radius of curvature C, and the constant radius of curvature D is larger than the constant radius of curvature B. Because of the space, afforded by the differing radii, at the edges of the articulation surfaces, the upper and lower elements are able to axially rotate relative to one another about the longitudinal axis of the spinal column through a range of angles without causing the vertebral body contact surfaces to move away from one another along the longitudinal axis. Once the axial rotation exceeds that range, the articulation surfaces interfere with one another as the concave arcs move toward positions in which they would be parallel to one another, and the distance between the vertebral body contact surfaces increases with continued axial rotation as the concave arcs ride up against their oppositely directed slopes. Thus, the articulation surfaces are configurable according to the present invention to permit normal physiologic axial rotational motion of the adjacent vertebral bones about the longitudinal axis through a range of angles without abnormal immediate axially opposite (or otherwise directed away from one another) movement, and to permit such axially opposite (or otherwise directed away from one another) movement when under normal physiologic conditions it should occur, that is, outside that range of angles.
  • [0033]
    In preferred embodiments where the constant radius of curvature A is larger than the constant radius of curvature C, and the constant radius of curvature D is larger than the constant radius of curvature B, the articulation surfaces maintain point-to-point contact over a range of normal physiologic articulating movement between the adjacent vertebral bones. That is, through flexion, extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation, the articulation surfaces are in point-to-point contact with one another.
  • [0034]
    Preferably, the surface area dimensions of the articulation surfaces are selected in view of the selected radii of curvature to prevent the edges of the saddle surfaces (particularly the edges of the concave arcs) from hitting any surrounding anatomic structures, or other portions of the opposing upper or lower element, before the limit of the normal physiologic range of an attempted articulation is reached.
  • [0035]
    In accordance with one or more aspects of the present invention, an apparatus for replacing at least a portion of an intervertebral disc in a spinal column includes: a first member having a first vertebral contact surface for engagement with an endplate of a first vertebral bone in the spinal column, and having a first articulation surface; and a second member having a second vertebral contact surface for engagement with an endplate of a second vertebral bone in the spinal column, and having a second articulation surface, wherein: an intervertebral disc space is defined substantially between the first and second endplates of the first and second vertebral bones, and at least one of the first and second articulation surfaces is a saddle shaped surface, and the articulation surfaces are sized and shaped to engage one another when the first and second members are disposed in the intervertebral disc space to enable the first and second vertebral bones to articulate in at least one of flexion, extension, and lateral bending.
  • [0036]
    In accordance with one or more aspects of the present invention, a method for replacing at least a portion of an intervertebral disc in a spinal column includes: removing the portion of the intervertebral disc from the spinal column; and inserting an apparatus for replacing the portion of the intervertebral disc into an intervertebral disc space defined substantially between adjacent vertebral bones of the spinal column, and positioning the apparatus between the vertebral bones, wherein the apparatus is operable to permit the adjacent vertebral bones to articulate relative to one another about at least one of: (i) a first center of rotation for at least one of flexion and extension that is located outside the intervertebral disc space, and (ii) a second center of rotation for lateral bending that is located outside the intervertebral disc space.
  • [0037]
    The novel features of the present invention, as well as the invention itself, both as to its structure and its operation will be understood from the accompanying drawings, taken in conjunction with the accompanying description, in which similar reference characters refer to similar parts throughout.
  • BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
  • [0038]
    FIGS. 1-5 show an artificial disc implant of the present invention in perspective, anterior, lateral, lateral cutaway, and posterior cutaway views, respectively.
  • [0039]
    FIGS. 6-12 show an upper element of the artificial disc implant of FIGS. 1-5 in perspective, bottom (looking longitudinally up), lateral, anterior, lateral cutaway, top (looking longitudinally down), and posterior cutaway views, respectively.
  • [0040]
    FIGS. 13-19 show a lower element of the artificial disc implant of FIGS. 1-5 in perspective, top (looking longitudinally down), lateral, anterior, lateral cutaway, bottom (looking longitudinally up), and posterior cutaway views, respectively.
  • [0041]
    FIG. 20 shows a lateral cross-section view of the artificial disc implant of FIGS. 1-5 in extension.
  • [0042]
    FIG. 21 shows a posterior cross-section view of the artificial disc implant of FIGS. 1-5 in lateral bending.
  • DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS
  • [0043]
    For the purposes of promoting an understanding of the principles of the invention, reference will now be made to the embodiment illustrated in the drawings and specific language will be used to describe the same. It will nevertheless be understood that no limitation of the scope of the invention is thereby intended, such alterations and further modifications in the illustrated device, and such further applications of the principles of the invention as illustrated therein, being contemplated as would normally occur to one skilled in the art to which the invention relates.
  • [0044]
    Referring now to FIGS. 1-5, an artificial disc implant 100 of the present invention is shown in perspective, anterior, lateral, lateral cutaway, and posterior cutaway views, respectively. The implant 100 includes a first (e.g., upper) element 200 and a second (e.g., lower) element 300, each having an outwardly facing vertebral body contact surface 202, 302, and each having an inwardly facing articulation surface 204, 304. The elements 200, 300 are disposed as shown with the articulation surfaces 204, 304 nested against one another, and the vertebral body contact surfaces 202, 302 facing away from one another. When the implant 100 is disposed in an intervertebral disc space in a cervical spine, in this configuration and with the vertebral body contact surfaces 202, 302 engaged with respective adjacent vertebral body endplates (not shown), the implant 100 enables the adjacent vertebral bones to move relative to one another in accordance with proper anatomical motion, as further described below.
  • [0045]
    Preferably, at least one (and more preferably both) of the elements 200, 300 has at least one long-term fixation structure (e.g., flange 206, 306) having at least one feature (e.g., through hole 208 a, 208 b, 308) for securing the element to an adjacent vertebral body. For example, the upper element 200 has an anterior flange 206 that extends upwardly and has two through holes 208 a, 208 b, each of which accepts a bone screw (not shown). And, for example, the lower element 300 has an anterior flange 306 that extends downwardly and has one through hole 308 that accepts a bone screw (not shown). Once the elements 200, 300 are disposed in the intervertebral space with the vertebral body contact surfaces 202, 302 engaged with respective adjacent vertebral body endplates (not shown), securing of bone screws through the holes 208 a, 208 b, 308 and into the anterior surfaces of the adjacent vertebral bones helps prevent the elements from becoming dislodged from, or displaced in, the intervertebral space. Preferably, the bore axes of the through holes 208 a, 208 b, 308 are angled toward the adjacent vertebral body as shown.
  • [0046]
    Further preferably, at least one (and more preferably both) of the elements 200, 300 has at least one short-term fixation structure (e.g., spike 210 a, 210 b, 310 a, 310 b) for securing the element to an adjacent vertebral body (and more preferably to an adjacent vertebral body endplate). For example, each of the elements 200, 300 has a respective pair of outwardly directed spikes 210 a, 210 b, 310 a, 310 b. Once the elements 200, 300 are disposed in the intervertebral space with the vertebral body contact surfaces 202, 302 engaged with respective adjacent vertebral body endplates (not shown), the spikes 210 a, 210 b, 310 a, 310 b dig into the adjacent vertebral body endplates under the compression along the longitudinal axis of the spinal column, and thus help prevent the elements from becoming dislodged from, or displaced in, the intervertebral space. Preferably, each of the spikes 210 a, 210 b, 310 a, 310 b is sloped toward the vertebral body contact surface 202, 302 and toward the posterior direction on its posterior side as shown, to facilitate ease of insertion of the implant 100 into the intervertebral space, and is either perpendicular to the vertebral body contact surface 202, 302 on its anterior side (as shown) or sloped toward the vertebral body contact surface 202, 302 and toward the posterior direction on its anterior side (not shown), to help prevent the elements 200, 300 from anteriorly (or otherwise) slipping out of the intervertebral space.
  • [0047]
    More particularly, and referring now to FIGS. 6-12, the upper element 200 of the artificial disc implant 100 shown in FIGS. 1-5 is shown in perspective, bottom (looking longitudinally up), lateral, anterior, lateral cutaway, top (looking longitudinally down), and posterior cutaway views, respectively. Further particularly, and referring now to FIGS. 13-19, the lower element 300 of the artificial disc implant 100 shown in FIGS. 1-5 is shown in perspective, top (looking longitudinally down), lateral, anterior, lateral cutaway, bottom (looking longitudinally up), and posterior cutaway views, respectively.
  • [0048]
    As introduced above, each of the elements 200, 300 has a longitudinally outwardly directed vertebral body contact surface 202, 302. Preferably, each surface 202, 302 is shaped to conform to an endplate of an adjacent vertebral body (not shown) against which it is to be positioned. For example, inasmuch as a review of the relevant anatomy indicates that lower endplates of vertebral bones in the cervical spine each have a central concavity, it is preferable that the surface 202 is curvate (and more preferably, domed as shown, or semi-cylindrical), to conform to the central concavity. And, for example, inasmuch as a review of the relevant anatomy indicates that upper endplates of vertebral bones in the cervical spine are generally flat, it is preferable that the surface 302 is flat, as shown. It should be understood that the surfaces 202, 302 can be formed or can be dynamically formable to have these or other shapes that closely conform to the adjacent vertebral body endplate, without departing from the scope of the present invention.
  • [0049]
    Each vertebral body contact surface 202, 302 further preferably has an osteoinductive or osteoconductive feature. For example, each surface 202, 302 is preferably porous and/or roughened. This can be accomplished by any manner known in the art, including, for example, grit blasting, porous coating, etching, burning, electrical discharge machining, and sintered beading. While both surfaces 202, 302 are preferably provided with such a feature, it should be understood that only one could have such a feature without departing from the scope of the present invention. Further, it should be understood that it is not necessary for the entire surface to be so featured, but rather only a portion, some portions, or all of the surface can be so featured, or have a variety of such features, without departing from the scope of the present invention.
  • [0050]
    Each vertebral body contact surface 202, 302 further preferably has the long-term fixation and short-term fixation structures described above and denoted by corresponding reference numbers on these FIGS. 6-19.
  • [0051]
    As introduced above, the upper element 200 has a longitudinally inwardly directed articulation surface 204. Preferably, as shown, the articulation surface 204 includes a saddle surface that is defined by a concave arc (denoted by reference numeral 212 on FIG. 10) that is swept perpendicular to and along a convex arc (denoted by reference numeral 214 on FIG. 12). As best seen in FIGS. 4, 5, 10, and 12, the articulation surface 204 has a cross-section in one plane that forms a concave arc 212, and a cross-section in another plane (perpendicular to that plane) that forms a convex arc 214. The concave arc 212 has a respective substantially constant radius of curvature about an axis perpendicular to the one plane. The convex arc 214 has a respective substantially constant radius of curvature about an axis perpendicular to the other plane. Therefore, the articulation surface 204 forms a substantially constant radii saddle-shaped articulation surface.
  • [0052]
    In this preferred embodiment, as indicated in FIG. 10, the concave arc 212 has a substantially constant radius of curvature A about an axis perpendicular to the anterior-posterior plane. And, in this preferred embodiment, as indicated in FIG. 12, the convex arc 214 has a substantially constant radius of curvature B about an axis perpendicular to the lateral plane. Preferably, radius A is less than radius B, and most preferably, radius A is 0.329 and radius B is 0.340. It should be noted, however, that the present invention is not limited to any particular dimension set, and further than in some embodiments of the present invention, radius A is equal to or greater than radius B.
  • [0053]
    Also as introduced above, the lower element 300 has a longitudinally inwardly directed articulation surface 304. Preferably, as shown, the articulation surface 304 includes a saddle surface that is defined by a convex arc (denoted by reference numeral 312 on FIG. 17) that is swept perpendicular to and along a concave arc (denoted by reference numeral 314 on FIG. 19). As best seen in FIGS. 4, 5, 17, and 19, the articulation surface 304 has a cross-section in one plane that forms a convex arc 312, and a cross-section in another plane (perpendicular to that plane) that forms a concave arc 314. The convex arc 312 has a respective substantially constant radius of curvature about an axis perpendicular to the one plane. The concave arc 314 has a respective substantially constant radius of curvature about an axis perpendicular to the other plane. Therefore, the articulation surface 304 also forms a substantially constant radii saddle-shaped articulation surface.
  • [0054]
    In this preferred embodiment, as indicated in FIG. 17, the convex arc 312 has a substantially constant radius of curvature C about an axis perpendicular to the anterior-posterior plane. And, in this preferred embodiment, as indicated in FIG. 19, the concave arc 314 has a substantially constant radius of curvature D about an axis perpendicular to the lateral plane. Preferably, radius C is less than radius D, and most preferably, radius C is 0.280 inches and radius D is 0.401 inches. It should be noted, however, that the present invention is not limited to any particular dimension set, and further than in some embodiments of the present invention, radius C is equal to or greater than radius D. Further in some embodiments, radii A, B, C, and D are of equal dimension.
  • [0055]
    Importantly, the substantially constant radii saddle shaped articulation surfaces 204, 304 are configured and sized to be nestable against one another and articulatable against one another, to enable adjacent vertebral bones (against which the upper and lower elements 200, 300 are respectively disposed in the intervertebral space) to articulate in flexion, extension, and lateral bending. More particularly, as best shown in FIGS. 1-5, the artificial disc implant 100 of the present invention is assembled by disposing the upper 200 and lower 300 elements such that the vertebral body contact surfaces 202, 302 are directed away from one another, and the articulation surfaces 204, 304 are nested against one another such that the concave arc 212 accommodates the convex arc 312 and such that the convex arc 214 is accommodated by the concave arc 314. Either during or after such assembly of the implant 100, the vertebral body contact surface 202 of the upper element 200 is fixed against a lower endplate of a superior vertebral body (not shown), and the vertebral body contact surface 302 of the lower element 300 is fixed against an upper endplate of an inferior vertebral body (not shown). As noted above, the preferable long-term and short-term fixation structures on the elements 200, 300 are useful for securing the elements 200, 300 to these adjacent vertebral bones.
  • [0056]
    Accordingly, movement of the adjacent vertebral bones relative to one another is permitted by the movement of the upper 200 and lower 300 elements relative to one another. With regard to the articulation surfaces 204, 304 being configured and sized to enable the adjacent vertebral bones to articulate in flexion, extension, and lateral bending, it is understood from the described geometry and positioning of the upper 200 and lower 300 elements once the implant 100 is assembled and implanted that in flexion and extension, the concave arcs (e.g., 212) of the upper element 200 ride on the convex arcs (e.g., 312) of the lower element 300 about a center of rotation (referenced as R3 on FIG. 18) at the center of the circle defined by the convex arc 312. This center of rotation R3 is below the articulation surface 304. It is further understood from the described geometry and positioning of the upper 200 and lower 300 elements that in lateral bending, the concave arcs (e.g., 314) of the lower element 300 ride on the convex arcs (e.g., 214) of the upper element 200 about a center of rotation (referenced as R2 on FIG. 12) at the center of the circle defined by the convex arc 214. This center of rotation R2 is above the articulation surface 204. During these articulations, the elements 200, 300 are maintained at substantially constant relative distraction positions, i.e., the elements 200, 300 do not significantly move (if at all) in directions that are directed away from one another (for example, do not move in opposing axial directions from one another (e.g., along the longitudinal axis of the spine)). Accordingly, the present invention provides a pair of articulation surfaces 204, 304 that have a center of rotation above the surfaces in one mode of motion (lateral bending), and below the surfaces in another (flexion/extension), consistent in these regards with a natural intervertebral joint in the cervical spine. Preferably, the articulation surfaces 204, 304 are sized and configured so that the respective ranges of angles through which flexion/extension and lateral bending can be experienced are equal to or greater than the respective normal physiologic ranges for such movements in the cervical spine. While the present invention is not limited to any particular dimensions, a preferred embodiment has the following radii of curvature for the convex arc 312 and the convex arc 214: C=0.280 inches and B=0.340 inches. Such preferable radii of curvature provide the preferred embodiment with a flexion/extension range of plus or minus 7.5 degrees (total of 15 degrees), and a lateral bending range of plus or minus 7.5 degrees (total of 15 degrees).
  • [0057]
    While the preferred embodiment is shown with concave arc 212 having a larger constant radius of curvature A than the constant radius of curvature C of convex arc 312 (for reasons that are described in detail below), and with concave arc 314 having a larger constant radius of curvature D than the constant radius of curvature B of convex arc 214 (for reasons that are described in detail below), it should be understood that the above described functionality can also be achieved using other relative radii sizes. For example, flexion, extension, and lateral bending are also possible if the constant radius of curvature A of concave arc 212 is otherwise non-congruent with (e.g., less than) or is congruent with (i.e., equal to) the constant radius of curvature C of convex arc 312, and/or if the constant radius of curvature D of concave arc 314 is otherwise non-congruent with (e.g., less than) or is congruent with (i.e., equal to) the constant radius of curvature B of convex arc 214.
  • [0058]
    As noted above, it is preferable that, in addition to the flexion, extension, and lateral bending motions described above, the adjacent vertebral bones be permitted by the artificial disc implant 100 to axially rotate relative to one another (e.g., about the longitudinal axis of the spinal column), through a range of angles without moving in opposite (or otherwise directed away from one another) directions (e.g., along the longitudinal axis) within that range. Preferably, the articulation surfaces 204, 304 are accordingly configured and sized to permit such movement. Referring again to FIGS. 1-5, a preferred configuration is shown as an example, where the constant radius of curvature A of concave arc 212 is larger than the constant radius of curvature C of convex arc 312, and the constant radius of curvature D of concave arc 314 is larger than the constant radius of curvature B of convex arc 214. It is understood from the described geometry and positioning of the upper 200 and lower 300 elements that, because of the space, afforded by the differing radii, at the edges of the articulation surfaces 204, 304, the upper 200 and lower 300 elements are able to axially rotate relative to one another (e.g., about the longitudinal axis) through a range of angles without causing the vertebral body contact surfaces 202, 302 to move in opposite (or otherwise directed away from one another) directions (e.g., along the longitudinal axis). Once the axial rotation exceeds that range, the articulation surfaces 204, 304 interfere with one another as the concave arcs 212, 314 move toward positions in which they would be parallel to one another, and the distance between the vertebral body contact surfaces 202, 302 increases with continued axial rotation as the concave arcs 212, 314 ride up against their oppositely directed slopes. Thus, the articulation surfaces 204, 304 are configurable according to the present invention to permit normal physiologic axial rotational motion of the adjacent vertebral bones about the longitudinal axis of the spinal column through a range of angles without abnormal immediate axially opposite (or otherwise directed away from one another) movement, and to permit such axially opposite (or otherwise directed away from one another) movement when under normal physiologic conditions it should occur, that is, outside that range of angles. While the present invention is not limited to any particular dimensions, a preferred embodiment has the following radii of curvature: A=0.329 inches, B=0.340 inches, C=0.280 inches, and D=0.401 inches. Such preferable radii of curvate provide the preferred embodiment with a longitudinal axial rotation range of plus or minus 3 degrees (total of 6 degrees) before oppositely directed movement of the articulating surfaces occurs.
  • [0059]
    It should be noted that in the preferred embodiment, and in other preferable embodiments where the constant radius of curvature A of concave arc 212 is larger than the constant radius of curvature C of convex arc 312, and the constant radius of curvature D of concave arc 314 is larger than the constant radius of curvature B of convex arc 214, the articulation surfaces 204, 304 maintain point-to-point contact over a range of normal physiologic articulating movement between the adjacent vertebral bones. This is illustrated in FIGS. 4, 5, 20, and 21. More particularly, it is understood from the described geometry and positioning of the upper 200 and lower 300 elements that through flexion, extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation, the articulation surfaces 204, 304 are in point-to-point contact with one another as they are in FIGS. 4 and 5. FIGS. 20 and 21 are provided to show the implant 100 in extension and lateral bending, respectively, to further illustrate this preferable feature.
  • [0060]
    It should further be noted that in addition to the radii of curvature dimensions of the articulation surfaces 204, 304 being relevant to a configuration and sizing of the articulation surfaces 204, 304 permitting normal physiologic flexion, extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation movements of the adjacent vertebral bones, the surface area dimensions are also relevant, particularly in relation to the selected radii of curvature. More particularly, in order to provide a range of relative angulation that is within the normal physiologic range of the cervical spine, not only must the selected radii of curvature be suitable as described above, but also and accordingly the surface area of the saddle surfaces should be of a dimension that, given the selected radii of curvature, prevents the edges of the saddle surfaces (particularly the edges of the concave arcs (e.g., 212 and e.g., 314)) from hitting any surrounding anatomic structures, or other portions of the opposing element (200 or 300), before the limit of the normal physiologic range of the attempted articulation is reached. As shown, one or both of the inwardly facing surfaces of the upper 200 and lower 300 elements can be tapered inwardly before presenting its articulation surface (204 or 304), to ensure a suitable surface area dimension to prevent such interference. While the present invention is not limited to any particular surface area dimensions, the illustrated preferred embodiment has a surface area of articulation surface 204 equal to 0.146 square inches, and a surface area of articulation surface 304 equal to 0.153 square inches.
  • [0061]
    Further preferably, the articulation surfaces 204, 304 are formed of cobalt-chrome that is polished to provide a smooth bearing surface. It should be understood that the articulation surfaces 204, 304, while preferably formed of cobalt-chrome, can be additionally or alternatively formed of other metals, such as, for example, stainless steel and/or titanium, or of non-metals, such as, for example, polyethylene and/or ceramic materials (e.g., alumina and zirconia), or of any other suitable material without departing from the scope of the present invention.
  • [0062]
    It should be noted that while the present invention is illustrated and described as an artificial disc implant for use in the cervical spine, the artificial disc implant of the present invention can be adapted for use in any other portion of the spine without departing from the scope of the present invention.
  • [0063]
    While the particular prostheses for the cervical intervertebral joint of the spine as herein shown and disclosed in detail are each fully capable of obtaining the objects and providing the advantages previously stated, it shall be understood that these variations are merely illustrative of the presently preferred embodiments of the invention and that no limitations to the scope of the present invention are intended to be inferred from the details of the construction or design herein shown.
Citations de brevets
Brevet cité Date de dépôt Date de publication Déposant Titre
US3278107 *22 juil. 196411 oct. 1966Cv Heljestrand AbInstrument for applying so-called staple sutures
US4105407 *2 août 19768 août 1978Sanderson Roger SSterilizing and storing medical items
US4457484 *28 déc. 19813 juil. 1984Hameister Helen MDisplay mounting assembly for collector plates
US4528980 *19 oct. 198316 juil. 1985Howmedica, Inc.Acetabulum sizer and drill guide
US4874314 *11 déc. 198717 oct. 1989Siemens AktiengesellschaftSocket to clampingly hold dental tools
US5030219 *22 janv. 19909 juil. 1991Boehringer Mannheim CorporationGlenoid component installation tools
US5236460 *10 oct. 199117 août 1993Midas Rex Pneumatic Tools, Inc.Vertebral body prosthesis
US5405400 *5 oct. 199311 avr. 1995Orthomet, Inc.Joint prosthesis enabling rotary circumduction
US5556432 *9 févr. 199317 sept. 1996Joachim TheusnerArtificial joint
US5599279 *29 janv. 19964 févr. 1997Gus J. SlotmanSurgical instruments and method useful for endoscopic spinal procedures
US5653762 *7 juin 19955 août 1997Pisharodi; MadhavanMethod of stabilizing adjacent vertebrae with rotating, lockable, middle-expanded intervertebral disk stabilizer
US5733290 *21 déc. 199531 mars 1998Johnson & Johnson Professional, Inc.Quick-release tibial alignment handle
US5769856 *24 juin 199623 juin 1998Osteonics Corp.Drill guide and implant method
US6106557 *22 juil. 199922 août 2000Howmedica GmbhReconstruction system for vertebra
US6139550 *11 févr. 199831 oct. 2000Michelson; Gary K.Skeletal plating system
US6143012 *4 mai 19987 nov. 2000Orthofix S.R.L.Intramedullary awl assembly for preparation for a femoral-style nailing
US6193757 *29 oct. 199827 févr. 2001Sdgi Holdings, Inc.Expandable intervertebral spacers
US6213055 *21 déc. 199810 avr. 2001J. W. Pet CompanyErgonomic handle for grooming brush
US6235034 *23 oct. 199822 mai 2001Robert S. BrayBone plate and bone screw guide mechanism
US6235060 *12 nov. 199722 mai 2001Hjs Gelenk System GmbhArtificial joint, in particular endoprosthesis for replacing natural joints
US6277149 *8 juin 199921 août 2001Osteotech, Inc.Ramp-shaped intervertebral implant
US6290726 *30 janv. 200018 sept. 2001Diamicron, Inc.Prosthetic hip joint having sintered polycrystalline diamond compact articulation surfaces
US6296647 *6 août 19992 oct. 2001Stryker Trauma GmbhInstrument for the positioning of an implant in the human spine
US6325828 *2 déc. 19974 déc. 2001Rose Biomedical ResearchApparatus for knee prosthesis
US6413259 *14 déc. 20002 juil. 2002Blackstone Medical, IncBone plate assembly including a screw retaining member
US6579290 *27 nov. 199817 juin 2003Surgicraft LimitedSurgical implant and surgical fixing screw
US6589247 *30 juil. 20018 juil. 2003Sdgi Holdings, Inc.Distraction instrument with fins for maintaining insertion location
US6645248 *23 août 200211 nov. 2003Sulzer Orthopedics Ltd.Artificial intervertebral disc
US6652525 *20 oct. 200025 nov. 2003Sofamor S.N.C.Anterior implant for the spine
US6679887 *4 juin 200120 janv. 2004Cortek, Inc.Surgical procedure for implanting spinal fusion device
US6800093 *7 janv. 20035 oct. 2004Cortek, Inc.Device for spinal fusion
US6835206 *13 mai 200228 déc. 2004Roger P. JacksonAnterior expandable spinal fusion cage system
US6837905 *26 sept. 20024 janv. 2005Daniel M. LiebermanSpinal vertebral fusion implant and method
US6908484 *6 mars 200321 juin 2005Spinecore, Inc.Cervical disc replacement
US20020010511 *6 juil. 200124 janv. 2002Michelson Gary KarlinExpandable implant with interlocking walls
US20020016595 *2 oct. 20017 févr. 2002Gary K. MichelsonScrews of cortical bone and method of manufacture thereof
US20020099376 *23 janv. 200125 juil. 2002Michelson Gary K.Interbody spinal implant with trailing end adapted to receive bone screws
US20020128712 *8 mars 200212 sept. 2002Michelson Gary K.Expansion constraining member adapted for use with an expandable interbody spinal fusion implant
US20020165612 *3 mai 20017 nov. 2002David GerberIntervertebral implant for transforaminal posterior lumbar interbody fusion procedure
US20030040802 *26 sept. 200227 févr. 2003Errico Joseph P.Artificial intervertebral disc having limited rotation using a captured ball and socket joint with a solid ball and compression locking post
US20030045939 *23 août 20026 mars 2003Simon CasuttArtificial intervertebral disc
US20030069586 *29 oct. 200210 avr. 2003Errico Joseph P.Instrumentation and methods for use in implanting an artificial intervertebral disc
US20030078590 *4 déc. 200224 avr. 2003Errico Joseph P.Static trials and related instruments and methods for use in implanting an artificial intervertebral disc
US20030093153 *27 sept. 200215 mai 2003Banick Christopher M.Skeletal stabilization implant
US20030114936 *29 juil. 200219 juin 2003Therics, Inc.Complex three-dimensional composite scaffold resistant to delimination
US20030135278 *16 janv. 200317 juil. 2003Concept Matrix, LlcIntervertebral disk prosthesis
US20030135279 *12 nov. 200217 juil. 2003Sofamor Danek Group, Inc.Artificial spinal fusion implants
US20030176921 *13 mars 200218 sept. 2003Lawson Kevin JonTwo-part prosthetic nucleus replacement for surgical reconstruction of intervertebral discs
US20030176922 *26 févr. 200318 sept. 2003Cross Medical Products, Inc.Keeled prosthetic nucleus
US20030176923 *13 janv. 200318 sept. 2003Waldemar Link Gmbh & Co.Intervertebral prosthesis
US20030187454 *1 avr. 20032 oct. 2003Gill Steven S.Artificial intervertebral joint permitting translational and rotational motion
US20030191534 *2 mars 20019 oct. 2003Guy ViartIntervertebral disc prosthesis
US20030208273 *9 janv. 20026 nov. 2003Lukas EisermannIntervertebral prosthetic joint
US20030216810 *19 juin 200220 nov. 2003Ralph James D.Artificial intervertebral disc utilizing a ball joint coupling
US20030229358 *29 avr. 200311 déc. 2003Errico Joseph P.Wedge plate inserter/impactor and related methods for use in implanting an artificial intervertebral disc
US20030233146 *18 juin 200218 déc. 2003Alexander GrinbergIntervertebral disc
US20040010316 *28 mars 200315 janv. 2004Lytton WilliamIntervertebral device and method of use
US20040034426 *15 août 200319 févr. 2004Errico Joseph P.Axially compressible artificial intervertebral disc having limited rotation using a captured ball and socket joint with a solid ball and compression locking post
US20040039387 *25 juin 200326 févr. 2004Larry GauseSystem for stabilizing a portion of the spine
US20040068318 *2 oct. 20028 avr. 2004Coates Bradley J.Modular intervertebral prosthesis system
US20040068320 *4 oct. 20028 avr. 2004Robie Bruce H.Prosthetic disc and vertebral body replacement device having pyrolytic carbon bearing members
US20040073311 *23 avr. 200315 avr. 2004Ferree Bret A.Two-component artificial disc replacements
US20040117022 *13 déc. 200217 juin 2004Theirry MarnayIntervertebral implant, insertion tool and method of inserting same
US20040143270 *14 oct. 200322 juil. 2004St. Francis Medical Technologies, Inc.Tools for implanting artificial vertebral disk and method
US20040148028 *19 déc. 200329 juil. 2004Ferree Bret A.Artificial disc replacement (ADR) extraction methods and apparatus
US20040167628 *1 mars 200426 août 2004Foley Kevin T.Systems and techniques for restoring and maintaining intervertebral anatomy
US20040176772 *18 févr. 20049 sept. 2004Rafail ZubokInstrumentation and methods for use in implanting a cervical disc replacement device
US20040176773 *18 févr. 20049 sept. 2004Rafail ZubokInstrumentation and methods for use in implanting a cervical disc replacement device
US20040176774 *18 févr. 20049 sept. 2004Rafail ZubokInstrumentation and methods for use in implanting a cervical disc replacement device
US20040176777 *18 févr. 20049 sept. 2004Rafail ZubokInstrumentation and methods for use in implanting a cervical disc replacement device
US20040176778 *6 mai 20049 sept. 2004Rafail ZubokInstrumentation and methods for use in implanting a cervical disc replacement device
US20040176843 *6 mai 20049 sept. 2004Rafail ZubokInstrumentation and methods for use in implanting a cervical disc replacement device
US20040176852 *6 mai 20049 sept. 2004Rafail ZubokInstrumentation and methods for use in implanting a cervical disc replacement device
US20040193272 *19 févr. 200430 sept. 2004Rafail ZubokInstrumentation and methods for use in implanting a cervical disc replacement device
US20040215198 *28 avr. 200328 oct. 2004Spine Solutions, Inc.Instruments and method for preparing an intervertebral space for receiving an artificial disc implant
US20040220567 *6 févr. 20044 nov. 2004Sdgi Holdings, Inc.Instruments and methods for aligning implants for insertion
US20040243240 *3 mai 20032 déc. 2004Jacques BeaurainIntervertebral disc prosthesis and fitting tools
US20040267369 *15 juil. 200430 déc. 2004Matthew LyonsArtificial intervertebral disc
US20050021042 *21 juil. 200327 janv. 2005Theirry MarnayInstruments and method for inserting an intervertebral implant
US20050033426 *6 janv. 200410 févr. 2005Ogilvie William F.Carpometacarpal joint prosthesis
US20050033430 *5 août 200310 févr. 2005Russell PowersSurgical kit and method for providing sterilized equipment for use in spinal surgery
US20050043800 *20 avr. 200424 févr. 2005Paul David C.Prosthetic spinal disc replacement
US20050043803 *6 juil. 200424 févr. 2005Robert SchultzIntervertebral implant
US20050055029 *20 juil. 200410 mars 2005Sdgi Holdings, Inc.Artificial spinal discs and associated implantation instruments and methods
US20050071013 *19 nov. 200431 mars 2005Spinecore, Inc.Instrumentation and methods for use in implanting a cervical disc replacement device
US20050085917 *30 nov. 200421 avr. 2005Thierry MarnayIntervertebral implant
US20050143749 *31 déc. 200330 juin 2005Depuy Spine, Inc.Inserter instrument and implant clip
US20050159819 *18 janv. 200521 juil. 2005Sdgi Holdings, Inc.Adjustable drill guide
US20050165487 *28 janv. 200428 juil. 2005Muhanna Nabil L.Artificial intervertebral disc
US20050197705 *26 juil. 20048 sept. 2005Uri ArninSpinal prosthesis
US20050228497 *23 avr. 200313 oct. 2005Ferree Bret AArtificial disc replacements with natural kinematics
US20050228500 *30 juil. 200413 oct. 2005Spinal Kinetics, Inc.Prosthetic intervertebral disc and methods for using same
US20050240271 *9 mai 200527 oct. 2005Spinecore, Inc.Cervical disc replacement
US20050240272 *9 mai 200527 oct. 2005Spinecore, Inc.Cervical disc replacement
US20050240273 *9 juin 200527 oct. 2005Khandkar Ashock CTotal disc implant
US20050256577 *18 sept. 200217 nov. 2005Mathys Medizinaltechnik AgImplant comprising a two-piece joint
US20050267581 *21 juil. 20051 déc. 2005Thierry MarnayIntervertebral Implant
US20050267582 *1 août 20051 déc. 2005Spinecore, Inc.Spacerless artificial disc replacements
US20050283237 *22 nov. 200422 déc. 2005St. Francis Medical Technologies, Inc.Artificial spinal disk replacement device with staggered vertebral body attachments
Référencé par
Brevet citant Date de dépôt Date de publication Déposant Titre
US770878019 nov. 20044 mai 2010Spinecore, Inc.Instrumentation and methods for use in implanting a cervical disc replacement device
US77714797 janv. 200510 août 2010Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc.Dual articulating spinal device and method
US781132630 janv. 200612 oct. 2010Warsaw Orthopedic Inc.Posterior joint replacement device
US78750777 janv. 200525 janv. 2011Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc.Support structure device and method
US79014597 janv. 20058 mars 2011Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc.Split spinal device and method
US792737512 sept. 200819 avr. 2011Doty Keith LDynamic six-degrees-of-freedom intervertebral spinal disc prosthesis
US803871323 avr. 200318 oct. 2011Spinecore, Inc.Two-component artificial disc replacements
US807559612 janv. 200713 déc. 2011Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc.Spinal prosthesis systems
US81099799 déc. 20097 févr. 2012Spinecore, Inc.Instrumentation and methods for use in implanting a cervical disc replacement device
US817288319 févr. 20108 mai 2012Brigham Young UniversityMethod of treating a degenerate spinal segment
US82023228 mars 201119 juin 2012Doty Keith LDynamic six-degrees-of-freedom intervertebral spinal disc prosthesis
US822672418 juin 200924 juil. 2012Doty Keith LIntervertebral spinal disc prosthesis
US823162830 nov. 200931 juil. 2012Spinecore, Inc.Instrumentation and methods for use in implanting a cervical disc replacement device
US827750510 juin 20112 oct. 2012Doty Keith LDevices for providing up to six-degrees of motion having kinematically-linked components and methods of use
US827750728 mai 20102 oct. 2012Spinecore, Inc.Spacerless artificial disc replacements
US82875985 déc. 201116 oct. 2012TrueMotion Spine, Inc.True spinal motion preserving, shock absorbing, intervertebral spinal disc prosthesis
US830880111 févr. 200813 nov. 2012Brigham Young UniversitySpinal implant
US83721502 août 201012 févr. 2013Warsaw Orthpedic, Inc.Spinal device and method
US84700413 oct. 201125 juin 2013Spinecore, Inc.Two-component artificial disc replacements
US866328619 févr. 20104 mars 2014Brigham Young UniversityCompliant dynamic spinal implant and associated methods
US867918229 août 201225 mars 2014Spinecore, Inc.Spacerless artificial disc replacements
US877795924 mai 200615 juil. 2014Spinecore, Inc.Intervertebral disc and insertion methods therefor
US87844929 janv. 201322 juil. 2014Spinecore, Inc.Artificial disc replacements with natural kinematics
US880178914 juin 201312 août 2014Spinecore, Inc.Two-component artificial disc replacements
US886483216 août 200721 oct. 2014Hh Spinal LlcPosterior total joint replacement
US888885215 juin 200918 nov. 2014Hh Spinal LlcSpinal athroplasty device and method
US889468725 avr. 201225 nov. 2014Nexus Spine, L.L.C.Coupling system for surgical construct
US89366409 mai 200520 janv. 2015Spinecore, Inc.Cervical disc replacement
US90285529 mai 200512 mai 2015Spinecore, Inc.Cervical disc replacement
US909545113 janv. 20144 août 2015Spinecore, Inc.Intervertebral disc and insertion methods therefor
US915749729 oct. 201013 oct. 2015Brigham Young UniversityLamina emergent torsional joint and related methods
US916814618 juin 201427 oct. 2015Spinecore, Inc.Artificial disc replacements with natural kinematics
US919877331 janv. 20141 déc. 2015Spinecore, Inc.Spacerless artificial disc replacements
US922683722 juin 20155 janv. 2016Spinecore, Inc.Intervertebral disc and insertion methods therefor
US923296523 févr. 201012 janv. 2016Nexus Spine, LLCPress-on link for surgical screws
US931434618 mars 201019 avr. 2016Brigham Young UniversitySpinal implant
US93330087 juin 201210 mai 2016Brigham Young UniversitySerpentine spinal stability device
US95266344 avr. 201627 déc. 2016Spinecore, Inc.Intervertebral disc and insertion methods therefor
US953911410 oct. 201310 janv. 2017Spinecore, Inc.Instruments and methods for inserting artificial intervertebral implants
US957267913 oct. 201521 févr. 2017Spinecore, Inc.Artificial disc replacements with natural kinematics
US96228824 avr. 201618 avr. 2017Spinecore, Inc.Intervertebral disc and insertion methods therefor
US964265111 juin 20159 mai 2017Brigham Young UniversityInverted serpentine spinal stability device and associated methods
US20050154461 *7 janv. 200514 juil. 2005Sdgi Holdings, Inc.Dual articulating spinal device and method
US20050154465 *7 janv. 200514 juil. 2005Sdgi Holdings, Inc.Split spinal device and method
US20050154467 *7 janv. 200514 juil. 2005Sdgi Holdings, Inc.Interconnected spinal device and method
US20050267582 *1 août 20051 déc. 2005Spinecore, Inc.Spacerless artificial disc replacements
US20080140075 *7 déc. 200712 juin 2008Ensign Michael DPress-On Pedicle Screw Assembly
US20080195213 *11 févr. 200814 août 2008Brigham Young UniversitySpinal implant
US20100211106 *19 févr. 201019 août 2010Bowden Anton ECompliant Dynamic Spinal Implant And Associated Methods
US20100217324 *19 févr. 201026 août 2010Bowden Anton ECompliant Dynamic Spinal Implant And Associated Methods
US20100217326 *19 févr. 201026 août 2010Bowden Anton EMethod of Treating A Degenerate Spinal Segment
US20100222821 *19 févr. 20102 sept. 2010Bowden Anton ECompliant Dynamic Spinal Implant
US20100222823 *19 févr. 20102 sept. 2010Bowden Anton EMethod Of Surgically Implanting A Spinal Implant
US20100241232 *18 mars 201023 sept. 2010Peter HalversonSpinal implant
US20100324688 *18 juin 200923 déc. 2010MekatronixIntervertebral spinal disc prosthesis
EP2241291A221 sept. 200720 oct. 2010SpineCore, Inc.Intervertebral disc implants and tooling
WO2008100891A1 *12 févr. 200821 août 2008Brigham Young UniversitySpinal implant
Événements juridiques
DateCodeÉvénementDescription
25 janv. 2016ASAssignment
Owner name: SPINECORE, INC., NEW JERSEY
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:ZUBOK, RAFAIL;VALDEVIT, ANTONIO;DUDASIK, MICHAEL W.;AND OTHERS;REEL/FRAME:037571/0187
Effective date: 20030306