US20050289127A1 - Methods and systems for managing data - Google Patents

Methods and systems for managing data Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US20050289127A1
US20050289127A1 US11/112,421 US11242105A US2005289127A1 US 20050289127 A1 US20050289127 A1 US 20050289127A1 US 11242105 A US11242105 A US 11242105A US 2005289127 A1 US2005289127 A1 US 2005289127A1
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
permissions
user
files
search
file
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Abandoned
Application number
US11/112,421
Inventor
Dominic Giampaolo
Yan Arrouye
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Apple Inc
Original Assignee
Apple Computer Inc
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Priority claimed from US10/877,584 external-priority patent/US7730012B2/en
Application filed by Apple Computer Inc filed Critical Apple Computer Inc
Priority to US11/112,421 priority Critical patent/US20050289127A1/en
Assigned to APPLE COMPUTER, INC. reassignment APPLE COMPUTER, INC. ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: ARROUYE, YAN, GIAMPAOLO, DOMINIC
Publication of US20050289127A1 publication Critical patent/US20050289127A1/en
Priority to US11/499,485 priority patent/US9081872B2/en
Priority to US11/646,871 priority patent/US8190638B2/en
Assigned to APPLE INC. reassignment APPLE INC. CHANGE OF NAME (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: APPLE COMPUTER, INC., A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION
Abandoned legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06FELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F16/00Information retrieval; Database structures therefor; File system structures therefor
    • G06F16/10File systems; File servers
    • G06F16/16File or folder operations, e.g. details of user interfaces specifically adapted to file systems
    • G06F16/168Details of user interfaces specifically adapted to file systems, e.g. browsing and visualisation, 2d or 3d GUIs
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06FELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F16/00Information retrieval; Database structures therefor; File system structures therefor
    • G06F16/10File systems; File servers
    • G06F16/14Details of searching files based on file metadata

Definitions

  • Modern data processing systems such as general purpose computer systems, allow the users of such systems to create a variety of different types of data files.
  • a typical user of a data processing system may create text files with a word processing program such as Microsoft Word or may create an image file with an image processing program such as Adobe's PhotoShop.
  • Numerous other types of files are capable of being created or modified, edited, and otherwise used by one or more users for a typical data processing system.
  • the large number of the different types of files that can be created or modified can present a challenge to a typical user who is seeking to find a particular file which has been created.
  • Modern data processing systems often include a file management system which allows a user to place files in various directories or subdirectories (e.g. folders) and allows a user to give the file a name. Further, these file management systems often allow a user to find a file by searching for the file's name, or the date of creation, or the date of modification, or the type of file.
  • An example of such a file management system is the Finder program which operates on Macintosh computers from Apple Computer, Inc. of Cupertino, Calif.
  • Another example of a file management system program is the Windows Explorer program which operates on the Windows operating system from Microsoft Corporation of Redmond, Wash.
  • Both the Finder program and the Windows Explorer program include a find command which allows a user to search for files by various criteria including a file name or a date of creation or a date of modification or the type of file.
  • this search capability searches through information which is the same for each file, regardless of the type of file.
  • the searchable data for a Microsoft Word file is the same as the searchable data for an Adobe PhotoShop file, and this data typically includes the file name, the type of file, the date of creation, the date of last modification, the size of the file and certain other parameters which may be maintained for the file by the file management system.
  • Certain presently existing application programs allow a user to maintain data about a particular file.
  • This data about a particular file may be considered metadata because it is data about other data.
  • This metadata for a particular file may include information about the author of a file, a summary of the document, and various other types of information.
  • a program such as Microsoft Word may automatically create some of this data when a user creates a file and the user may add additional data or edit the data by selecting the “property sheet” from a menu selection in Microsoft Word.
  • the property sheets in Microsoft Word allow a user to create metadata for a particular file or document.
  • a user is not able to search for metadata across a variety of different applications using one search request from the user.
  • existing systems can perform one search for data files, but this search does not also include searching through metadata for those files.
  • an exemplary method of processing data includes receiving a search query from a first user, and performing a search, based on a search query, of at least metadata of a first plurality of files, determining a set of permissions for the first user, which set of permissions define at least a right to view information, wherein the type of information in metadata for files of a first type differs from a type of information in metadata for files of the second type.
  • the set of permissions prevents the display of information about a first set of files and metadata for the first set of files for which the first user does not have access to view and wherein the search is performed without regard to the set of permissions, but results of the search are filtered to provide the displayed results.
  • an exemplary method includes receiving a search query from a first user having a set of permissions defined relative to at least a set of files within a first plurality of files accessible on the data processing system, and performing a search using a search query, wherein the search is not limited by the set of permissions of the first user, and the search produces a first set of files matching the search query, and filtering, after the search, the first set of files with the set of permissions to produce the second set of files for which the first user has permission to access.
  • the first set of files includes files which represent metadata for other files included within the first set of files, and some of the metadata for which the first user does not have permission to access is filtered out as part of the filtering, thereby preventing the first user from having access to such metadata.
  • the filtering may use a permissions cache which includes permission information for files which have been found from prior search queries (e.g. the files matched prior search queries and thus were “hits” and their identification information, such as a unique, persistent identifier, and their permission information were saved in the permission cache for use in filtering of future searches).
  • the permissions cache will often have the necessary information about at least some of the files matching the search query and thus the search software can avoid having to request permissions information for all files matching the search query.
  • This use of a permissions cache will improve the speed of filtering because, typically, fewer requests to the file system software which maintains file system information, including the permissions information, will be required.
  • the request for permissions information e.g. a request from the software searching the metadata database and the content index database to the file system software
  • an exemplary method includes receiving a search query from a user having a set of permissions defined relative to at least a set of files within a plurality of files accessible on the data processing system and performing a search using the search query, wherein the search is not limited by the set of permissions and the search produces a first set of files matching the search query, and determining a state of at least a portion of a permissions cache, and filtering, either after the search or as the search is being performed, the first set of files with at least those portions of the permissions cache which are determined to be valid.
  • the filtering uses, to the extent that the portions of the permissions cache are valid, the permissions information in the permissions cache to determine which files can be displayed to the user who inputted the search query.
  • a method may either look up the permissions of files having known invalid permissions information in the permissions cache (and use the permissions information in the permissions cache for those files having valid permission information in the cache) or may discard the entire permissions cache and build a new permissions cache as new searches are performed.
  • the system presents in a display the files matching the search query and matching the permissions criteria of the user.
  • the searching for files which match a search query and the validation of permissions for those files may occur concurrently; for example, as files, which match the search query, are found in the searching process, their permissions can be examined to determine whether the user can view or otherwise get access to the files while the search, using the search query, continues to look for other files that match the search query.
  • FIG. 1 shows an exemplary embodiment of a data processing system, which may be a general purpose computer system and which may operate in any of the various methods described herein.
  • FIG. 2 shows a general example of one exemplary method of one aspect of the invention.
  • FIG. 3A shows an example of the content of the particular type of metadata for a particular type of file.
  • FIG. 3B shows another example of a particular type of metadata for another particular type of file.
  • FIG. 4 shows an example of an architecture for managing metadata according to one exemplary embodiment of the invention.
  • FIG. 5 is a flowchart showing another exemplary method of the present invention.
  • FIG. 6 shows an example of a storage format which utilizes a flat file format for metadata according to one exemplary embodiment of the invention.
  • FIGS. 7A-7E show a sequence of graphical user interfaces provided by one exemplary embodiment in order to allow searching of metadata and/or other data in a data processing system.
  • FIGS. 8A and 8B show two examples of formats for displaying search results according to one exemplary embodiment of the invention.
  • FIG. 9 shows another exemplary user interface of the present invention.
  • FIG. 10 shows another exemplary user interface of the present invention.
  • FIGS. 11A-11D show, in sequence, another exemplary user interface according to the present invention.
  • FIGS. 12A-12D show alternative embodiments of user interfaces according to the present invention.
  • FIGS. 13A and 13B show further alternative embodiments of user interfaces according to the present invention.
  • FIGS. 14A, 14B , 14 C, and 14 D show further alternative embodiments of user interfaces according to the present invention.
  • FIGS. 15A, 15B , 15 C and 15 D show another alternative embodiment of user interfaces according to the present invention.
  • FIGS. 16A and 16B show certain aspects of embodiments of user interfaces according to the present invention.
  • FIG. 17 shows an aspect of certain embodiments of user interfaces according to the present invention.
  • FIGS. 18A and 18B show further aspects of certain embodiments of user interfaces according to the present invention.
  • FIGS. 19A, 19B , 19 C, 19 D, and 19 E show further illustrative embodiments of user interfaces according to the present invention.
  • FIG. 20 is a flow chart which illustrates another exemplary method of the present invention.
  • FIG. 21 is a flow chart showing another exemplary method of the present invention.
  • FIGS. 22A, 22B , 22 C, and 22 D illustrate the display of a display device on which an embodiment of the method of FIG. 21 is performed.
  • FIG. 23 is a flow chart which illustrates an exemplary method according to certain aspects of the inventions.
  • FIG. 24 is a flow chart which illustrates another exemplary method according to certain aspects of the inventions described herein.
  • FIG. 25 is a flow chart which illustrates a further more specific exemplary method according to certain aspects of the inventions.
  • FIGS. 26 and 27 provide an example of user interfaces which allow a user to set preferences with respect to how information is kept private and how information is displayed in response to searches.
  • FIG. 28A is a flowchart which illustrates another exemplary method according to certain embodiments of the inventions in which a permissions cache is used.
  • FIG. 28B is a flowchart which illustrates another exemplary method which includes the use of a permissions cache.
  • FIGS. 29A and 29B are flowcharts which illustrate other exemplary methods which include the use of a permissions cache.
  • the present description includes material protected by copyrights, such as illustrations of graphical user interface images.
  • the copyright owner has no objection to the facsimile reproduction by anyone of the patent document or the patent disclosure, as it appears in the Patent and Trademark Office file or records, but otherwise reserves all copyrights whatsoever. Copyright Apple Computer, Inc. 2004.
  • FIG. 1 shows one example of a typical computer system which may be used with the present invention.
  • FIG. 1 illustrates various components of a computer system, it is not intended to represent any particular architecture or manner of interconnecting the components as such details are not germane to the present invention. It will also be appreciated that network computers and other data processing systems which have fewer components or perhaps more components may also be used with the present invention.
  • the computer system of FIG. 1 may, for example, be a Macintosh computer from Apple Computer, Inc.
  • the computer system 101 which is a form of a data processing system, includes a bus 102 which is coupled to a microprocessor(s) 103 and a ROM (Read Only Memory) 107 and volatile RAM 105 and a non-volatile memory 106 .
  • the microprocessor 103 may be a G3 or G4 microprocessor from Motorola, Inc. or one or more G5 microprocessors from IBM.
  • the bus 102 interconnects these various components together and also interconnects these components 103 , 107 , 105 , and 106 to a display controller and display device 104 and to peripheral devices such as input/output ( 1 /O) devices which may be mice, keyboards, modems, network interfaces, printers and other devices which are well known in the art.
  • input/output devices 109 are coupled to the system through input/output controllers 108 .
  • the volatile RAM (Random Access Memory) 105 is typically implemented as dynamic RAM (DRAM) which requires power continually in order to refresh or maintain the data in the memory.
  • the mass storage 106 is typically a magnetic hard drive or a magnetic optical drive or an optical drive or a DVD RAM or other types of memory systems which maintain data (e.g. large amounts of data) even after power is removed from the system.
  • the mass storage 106 will also be a random access memory although this is not required. While FIG. 1 shows that the mass storage 106 is a local device coupled directly to the rest of the components in the data processing system, it will be appreciated that the present invention may utilize a non-volatile memory which is remote from the system, such as a network storage device which is coupled to the data processing system through a network interface such as a modem or Ethernet interface.
  • the bus 102 may include one or more buses connected to each other through various bridges, controllers and/or adapters as is well known in the art.
  • the I/O controller 108 includes a USB (Universal Serial Bus) adapter for controlling USB peripherals and an IEEE 1394 controller for IEEE 1394 compliant peripherals.
  • USB Universal Serial Bus
  • aspects of the present invention may be embodied, at least in part, in software. That is, the techniques may be carried out in a computer system or other data processing system in response to its processor, such as a microprocessor, executing sequences of instructions contained in a memory, such as ROM 107 , RAM 105 , mass storage 106 or a remote storage device.
  • a processor such as a microprocessor
  • a memory such as ROM 107 , RAM 105 , mass storage 106 or a remote storage device.
  • hardwired circuitry may be used in combination with software instructions to implement the present invention.
  • the techniques are not limited to any specific combination of hardware circuitry and software nor to any particular source for the instructions executed by the data processing system.
  • various functions and operations are described as being performed by or caused by software code to simplify description. However, those skilled in the art will recognize what is meant by such expressions is that the functions result from execution of the code by a processor, such as the microprocessor 103 .
  • FIG. 2 shows a generalized example of one embodiment of the present invention.
  • captured metadata is made available to a searching facility, such as a component of the operating system which allows concurrent searching of all metadata for all applications having captured metadata (and optionally for all non-metadata of the data files).
  • the method of FIG. 2 may begin in operation 201 in which metadata is captured from a variety of different application programs.
  • This captured metadata is then made available in operation 203 to a searching facility, such as a file management system software for searching.
  • This searching facility allows, in operation 205 , the searching of metadata across all applications having captured metadata.
  • the method also provides, in operation 207 , a user interface of a search engine and the search results which are obtained by the search engine.
  • FIG. 5 shows a specific implementation of one exemplary embodiment of the method of FIG. 2 .
  • the metadata may be provided by each application program to a central source which stores the metadata for use by searching facilities and which is managed by an operating system component, which may be, for example, the metadata processing software.
  • the user interface provided in operation 207 may take a variety of different formats, including some of the examples described below as well as user interfaces which are conventional, prior art user interfaces.
  • the metadata may be stored in a database which may be any of a variety of formats including a B tree format or, as described below, in a flat file format according to one embodiment of the invention.
  • the method of FIG. 2 may be implemented for programs which do not store or provide metadata.
  • a portion of the operating system provides for the capture of the metadata from the variety of different programs even though the programs have not been designed to provide or capture metadata.
  • certain embodiments of the present invention may allow the exporting back of captured metadata back into data files for applications which maintain metadata about their data files.
  • the method of FIG. 2 allows information about a variety of different files created by a variety of different application programs to be accessible by a system wide searching facility, which is similar to the way in which prior art versions of the Finder or Windows Explorer can search for file names, dates of creation, etc. across a variety of different application programs.
  • the metadata for a variety of different files created by a variety of different application programs can be accessed through an extension of an operating system, and an example of such an extension is shown in FIG. 4 as a metadata processing software which interacts with other components of the system and will be described further below.
  • FIGS. 3A and 3B show two different metadata formats for two different types of data files. Note that there may be no overlap in any of the fields; in other words, no field in one type of metadata is the same as any field in the other type of metadata.
  • Metadata format 301 may be used for an image file such as a JPEG image file. This metadata may include information such as the image's width, the image's height, the image's color space, the number of bits per pixel, the ISO setting, the flash setting, the F/stop of the camera, the brand name of the camera which took the image, user-added keywords and other fields, such as a field which uniquely identifies the particular file, which identification is persistent through modifications of the file. Metadata format 331 shown in FIG.
  • the data in this metadata format may include an identification of the artist, the genre of the music, the name of the album, song names in the album or the song name of the particular file, song play times or the song play time of a particular song and other fields, such as a persistent file ID number which identifies the particular MP3 file from which the metadata was captured. Other types of fields may also be used.
  • the following chart shows examples of the various fields which may be used in metadata for various types of files.
  • Very well may Services be the file name, but it may also be the subject of an e-mail message or the full name of a person, for example.
  • Keywords This is a list words set CFString Yes System- Yes Yes Ask by the user to identify provided arbitrary sets of keywords organization. The scope (if any) is determined by the user and can be flexibly used for any kind of organization. For example, Family, Hawaii, Project X, etc. Contact A list of contacts that CFString Yes No Yes Yes Ask Address Keywords are associated with this Book document, beyond what is captured as Author.
  • CreatorApp Keeps track of the CFString No ? No Yes application that was used to create this document (if it's known). Languages The languages that this CFString Yes Yes Yes Yes document is composed in (for either text or audio-based media) ParentalControl A field that is used to CFString No ? Yes Yes determine whether this is kid-friendly content or not Publishers The name or a person or CFString Yes No Yes Yes Address organization that Book published this content. PublishedDate The original date that CFDate No No Yes Yes this content was published (if it was), independent of created date. Reviewers A list of contacts who CFString Yes No Yes Yes Address have reviewed the Book contents of this file. This would have to be set explicitly by an application.
  • ImageHeight The height of the image CFNumber No Yes in pixels ImageWidth
  • ProfileName The name of the color CFString No Yes ColorSync profile used with for Utility? image ResolutionWidth Resolution width of this CFNumber No Yes image (i.e. dpi from a scanner)
  • ResolutionHeight Resolution height of this CFNumber No Yes image i.e. dpi from a scanner
  • LayerNames For image formats that CFString Yes Yes contain “named” layers (e.g. Photoshop files)
  • Aperture The f-stop rating of the CFNumber No Yes camera when the image was taken
  • CameraMake The make of the camera CFString No Yes Yes that was used to acquire this image (e.g.
  • AudioBitRate The audio bit rate of the CFNumber No Yes media AspectRatio The aspect ratio of the CFString No Yes video of the media ColorSpace
  • the color space model CFString No Yes used for the video aspect of the media FrameHeight The frame height in CFNumber No Yes pixels of the video in the media FrameWidth
  • the frame width in CFNumber No Yes pixels of the video in the media ProfileName The name of the color CFString No Yes profile used on the video portion of the media
  • VideoBitRate The bit rate of the video CFNumber No Yes aspect of the media Text Data Subject The subject of the text.
  • CFString No Yes This could be metadata that's supplied with the text or something automatically generated with technologies like VTWIN PageCount The number of printable CFNumber No Yes pages of the document LineCount The number of lines in CFNumber No Yes the document WordCount The number of words in CFNumber No Yes the document URL The URL that will get CFString No Yes you to this document (or at least did at one time). Relevant for saved HTML documents, bookmarks, RSS feeds, etc. PageTitle The title of a web page. CFString No Yes Relevant to HTML or bookmark documents Google Structure of where this CFString No Yes Hierarchy page can be found in the Google hierarchy.
  • One particular field which may be useful in the various metadata formats would be a field which includes an identifier of a plug in or other software element which may be used to capture metadata from a data file and/or export metadata back to the creator application.
  • the software architecture shown in FIG. 4 is an example which is based upon the Macintosh operating system.
  • the architecture 400 includes a metadata processing software 401 and an operating system (OS) kernel 403 which is operatively coupled to the metadata processing software 401 for a notification mechanism which is described below.
  • the metadata processing software 401 is also coupled to other software programs such as a file system graphical user interface software 405 (which may be the Finder), an email software 407 , and other applications 409 .
  • These applications are coupled to the metadata processing software 401 through client application program interface 411 which provide a method for transferring data and commands between the metadata processing software 401 and the software 405 , 407 , and 409 .
  • These commands and data may include search parameters specified by a user as well as commands to perform searches from the user, which parameters and commands are passed to the metadata processing software 401 through the interface 411 .
  • the metadata processing software 401 is also coupled to a collection of importers 413 which extract data from various applications.
  • a text importer is used to extract text and other information from word processing or text processing files created by word processing programs such as Microsoft Word, etc. This extracted information is the metadata for a particular file.
  • importers extract metadata from other types of files, such as image files or music files.
  • a particular importer is selected based upon the type of file which has been created and modified by an application program. For example, if the data file was created by PhotoShop, then an image importer for PhotoShop may be used to input the metadata from a PhotoShop data file into the metadata database 415 through the metadata processing software 401 . On the other hand, if the data file is a word processing document, then an importer designed to extract metadata from a word processing document is called upon to extract the metadata from the word processing data file and place it into the metadata database 415 through the metadata processing software 401 .
  • the importers 413 may optionally include a plurality of exporters which are capable of exporting the extracted metadata for particular types of data files back to property sheets or other data components maintained by certain application programs.
  • certain application programs may maintain some metadata for each data file created by the program, but this metadata is only a subset of the metadata extracted by an importer from this type of data file.
  • the exporter may export back additional metadata or may simply insert metadata into blank fields of metadata maintained by the application program.
  • the software architecture 400 also includes a file system directory 417 for the metadata.
  • This file system directory keeps track of the relationship between the data files and their metadata and keeps track of the location of the metadata object (e.g. a metadata file which corresponds to the data file from which it was extracted) created by each importer.
  • the metadata database is maintained as a flat file format as described below, and the file system directory 417 maintains this flat file format.
  • One advantage of a flat file format is that the data is laid out on a storage device as a string of data without references between fields from one metadata file (corresponding to a particular data file) to another metadata file (corresponding to another data file). This arrangement of data will often result in faster retrieval of information from the metadata database 415 .
  • the software architecture 400 of FIG. 4 also includes find by content software 419 which is operatively coupled to a database 421 which includes an index of files.
  • the index of files represents at least a subset of the data files in a storage device and may include all of the data files in a particular storage device (or several storage devices), such as the main hard drive of a computer system.
  • the index of files may be a conventional indexed representation of the content of each document.
  • the find by content software 419 searches for words in that content by searching through the database 421 to see if a particular word exists in any of the data files which have been indexed.
  • the find by content software functionality is available through the metadata processing software 401 which provides the advantage to the user that the user can search concurrently both the index of files in the database 421 (for the content within a file) as well as the metadata for the various data files being searched.
  • the software architecture shown in FIG. 4 may be used to perform the method shown in FIG. 5 or alternative architectures may be used to perform the method of FIG. 5 .
  • the method of FIG. 5 may begin in operation 501 in which a notification of a change for a file is received.
  • This notification may come from the OS kernel 403 which notifies the metadata processing software 401 that a file has been changed.
  • This notification may come from sniffer software elements which detect new or modified files and deletion of files.
  • This change may be the creation of a new file or the modification of an existing file or the deletion of an existing file.
  • the deletion of an existing file causes a special case of the processing method of FIG. 5 and is not shown in FIG. 5 .
  • the metadata processing software 401 through the use of the file system directory 417 , deletes the metadata file in the metadata database 415 which corresponds to the deleted file.
  • the other types of operations causes the processing to proceed from operation 501 to operation 503 in which the type of file which is the subject of the notification is determined.
  • the file may be an Acrobat PDF file or an RTF word processing file or a JPEG image file, etc.
  • the type of the file is determined in operation 503 . This may be performed by receiving from the OS kernel 403 the type of file along with the notification or the metadata processing software 401 may request an identification of the type of file from the file system graphical user interface software 405 or similar software which maintains information about the data file, such as the creator application or parent application of the data file.
  • the file system graphical user interface software 405 is the Finder program which operates on the Macintosh operating system.
  • the file system graphical user interface system may be Windows Explorer which operates on Microsoft's Windows operating system.
  • the appropriate capture software e.g. one of the importers 413
  • the importers may be a plug-in for the particular application which created the type of file about which notification is received in operation 501 .
  • the importer or capture software imports the appropriate metadata (for the particular file type) into the metadata database, such as metadata database 415 as shown in operation 507 .
  • the metadata is stored in the database.
  • it may be stored in a flat file format.
  • the metadata processing software 401 receives search parameter inputs and performs a search of the metadata database (and optionally also causes a search of non-metadata sources such as the index of files 421 ) and causes the results of the search to be displayed in a user interface. This may be performed by exchanging information between one of the applications, such as the software 405 or the software 407 or the other applications 409 and the metadata processing software 401 through the interface 411 .
  • the file system software 405 may present a graphical user interface, allowing a user to input search parameters and allowing the user to cause a search to be performed.
  • This information is conveyed through the interface 411 to the metadata processing software 401 which causes a search through the metadata database 415 and also may cause a search through the database 421 of the indexed files in order to search for content within each data file which has been indexed.
  • the results from these searches are provided by the metadata processing software 401 to the requesting application which, in the example given here, was the software 405 , but it will be appreciated that other components of software, such as the email software 407 , may be used to receive the search inputs and to provide a display of the search results.
  • the user interface for inputting search requests and for displaying search results are described herein and shown in the accompanying drawings.
  • the notification if done through the OS kernel, is a global, system wide notification process such that changes to any file will cause a notification to be sent to the metadata processing software.
  • each application program may itself generate the necessary metadata and provide the metadata directly to a metadata database without the requirement of a notification from an operating system kernel or from the intervention of importers, such as the importers 413 .
  • an embodiment may use software calls from each application to a metadata processing software which receives these calls and then imports the metadata from each file in response to the call.
  • the metadata database 415 may be stored in a flat file format in order to improve the speed of retrieval of information in most circumstances.
  • the flat file format may be considered to be a non-B tree, non-hash tree format in which data is not attempted to be organized but is rather stored as a stream of data.
  • Each metadata object or metadata file will itself contain fields, such as the fields shown in the examples of FIGS. 3A and 3B . However, there will typically be no relationship or reference or pointer from one field in one metadata file to the corresponding field (or another field) in the next metadata file or in another metadata file of the same file type.
  • FIG. 6 shows an example of the layout in a flat file format of metadata.
  • the format 601 includes a plurality of metadata files for a corresponding plurality of data files.
  • Metadata file 603 is metadata from file 1 of application A and may be referred to as metadata file A 1 .
  • metadata file 605 is metadata from file 1 of application B and may be referred to as metadata file B 1 .
  • Each of these metadata files typically would include fields which are not linked to other fields and which do not contain references or pointers to other fields in other metadata files.
  • the metadata database of FIG. 6 includes metadata files from a plurality of different applications (applications A, B, and C) and different files created by each of those applications.
  • Metadata files 607 , 609 , 611 , and 617 are additional metadata files created by applications A, B, and C as shown in FIG. 6 .
  • a flexible query language may be used to search the metadata database in the same way that such query languages are used to search other databases.
  • the data within each metadata file may be packed or even compressed if desirable.
  • each metadata file in certain embodiments, will include a persistent identifier which uniquely identifies its corresponding data file. This identifier remains the same even if the name of the file is changed or the file is modified. This allows for the persistent association between the particular data file and its metadata.
  • FIG. 7A shows a graphical user interface which is a window which may be displayed on a display device which is coupled to a data processing system such as a computer system.
  • the window 701 includes a side bar having two regions 703 A, which is a user-configurable region, and 703 B, which is a region which is specified by the data processing system. Further details in connection with these side bar regions may be found in co-pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. ______ filed Jun. 22, 2004, and entitled “Methods and Apparatuses for Operating a Data Processing System,” by inventors Donald Lindsay and Bas Ording, attorney docket number 04860.P3306.
  • the window 701 also includes a display region 705 which in this case displays the results of searches requested by the user.
  • the window 701 also includes a search parameter menu bar 707 which includes configurable pull down menus 713 , 715 , and 717 .
  • the window 701 also includes a text entry region 709 which allows a user to enter text as part of the search query or search parameters.
  • the button 711 may be a start search button which a user activates in order to start a search based upon the selected search parameters. Alternatively, the system may perform a search as soon as it receives any search parameter inputs or search queries from the user rather than waiting for a command to begin the search.
  • the window 701 also includes a title bar 729 which may be used in conjunction with a cursor control device to move, in a conventional manner, the window around a desktop which is displayed on a display device.
  • the window 701 also includes a close button 734 , a minimize button 735 , and a resize button 736 which may be used to close or minimize or resize, respectively, the window.
  • the window 701 also includes a resizing control 731 which allows a user to modify the size of the window on a display device.
  • the window 701 further includes a back button 732 and a forward button 733 which function in a manner which is similar to the back and forward buttons on a web browser, such as Internet Explorer or Safari.
  • the window 701 also includes view controls which include three buttons for selecting three different types of views of the content within the display region 705 .
  • scroll controls such as scroll controls 721 , 722 , and 723 , appear within the window 701 . These may be used in a conventional manner, for example, by dragging the scroll bar 721 within the scroll region 721 A using conventional graphical user interface techniques.
  • the combination of text entry region 709 and the search parameter menu bar allow a user to specify a search query or search parameters.
  • Each of the configurable pull down menus presents a user with a list of options to select from when the user activates the pull down menu. As shown in FIG. 7A , the user has already made a selection from the configurable pull down menu 713 to specify the location of the search, which in this case specifies that the search will occur on the local disks of the computer systems.
  • Configurable pull down menu 715 has also been used by the user to specify the kind of document which is to be searched for, which in this case is an image document as indicated by the configurable pull down menu 715 which indicates “images” as the selected configuration of this menu and hence the search parameter which it specifies.
  • the configurable pull down menu 717 represents an add search parameter pull down menu.
  • This add search parameter pull down menu allows the user to add additional criteria to the search query to further limit the search results.
  • each of the search parameters is logically ANDed in a Boolean manner.
  • the current search parameter specified by the user in the state shown in FIG. 7A searches all local disks for all images, and the user is in the middle of the process of selecting another search criteria by having selected the add search criteria pull down menu 717 , resulting in the display of the pull down menu 719 , which has a plurality of options which may be selected by the user.
  • FIG. 7B shows the window 701 after the user has caused the selection of the time option within pull down menu 719 , thereby causing the display of a submenu 719 A which includes a list of possible times which the user may select from.
  • the user wants to limit the search to all images on all local disks within a certain period of time which is to be specified by making a selection within the submenu 719 A.
  • FIG. 7C shows the window 701 on the display of a data processing system after the user has selected a particular option (in this case “past week”) from the submenu 719 A. If the user accepts this selection, then the display shown in FIG. 7D results in which the configurable pull down menu 718 is displayed showing that the user has selected as part of the search criteria files that have been created or modified in the past week. It can be seen from FIG. 7D that the user can change the particular time selected from this pull down menu 718 by selecting another time period within the pull down menu 718 A shown in FIG. 7D . Note that the configurable pull down menu 717 , which represents an add search parameter menu, has now moved to the right of the configurable pull down menu 718 .
  • a particular option in this case “past week”
  • the user may add further search parameters by pressing or otherwise activating the configurable pull down menu 717 from the search parameter menu bar 707 . If the user decides that the past week is the proper search criteria in the time category, then the user may release the pull down menu 718 A from being displayed in a variety of different ways (e.g. the user may release the mouse button which was being depressed to keep the pull down menu 718 A on the display). Upon releasing or otherwise dismissing the pull down menu 718 A, the resulting window 701 shown in FIG. 7E then appears. There are several aspects of this user interface shown in FIG. 7A-7E which are worthy of being noted.
  • the search parameters or search query is specified within the same window as the display of the search results.
  • the configurable pull down menus includes hierarchical pull down menus. An example of this is shown in FIG. 7B in which the selection of the time criteria from the pull down menu 717 results in the display of another menu, in this case a submenu 719 A which may be selected from by the user. This allows for a compact presentation of the various search parameters while keeping the initial complexity (e.g. without submenus being displayed) at a lower level. Another useful aspect of the user interface shown in FIG.
  • the configurable pull down menu 713 currently specifies the location of the search (in this case, all local disks), however, this may be modified by selecting the pull down region associated with the configurable pull down menu 713 , causing the display of a menu of options indicating alternative locations which may be selected by the user.
  • FIG. 7D in which the past week option has been selected by the user (as indicated by “past week” being in the search parameter menu bar 707 ), but a menu of options shown in the pull down menu 71 8 A allows the user to change the selected time from the “past week” to some other time criteria.
  • Another useful aspect of this user interface is the ability to continue adding various search criteria by using the add search criteria pull down menu 717 and selecting a new criteria.
  • the various options in the pull down menus may depend upon the fields within a particular type of metadata file. For example, the selection of “images” to be searched may cause the various fields present in the metadata for an image type file to appear in one or more pull down menus, allowing the user to search within one or more of those fields for that particular type of file. Other fields which do not apply to “images” types of files may not appear in these menus in order reduce the complexity of the menus and to prevent user confusion.
  • the side bar region 703 A which is the user-configurable portion of the side bar, includes a representation of a folder 725 which represents the search results obtained from a particular search, which search results may be static or they may be dynamic in that, in certain instances, the search can be performed again to obtain results based on the current files in the system.
  • the folder 725 in the example shown in FIGS. 7A-7E represents a search on a local disk for all images done on December 10 th . By selecting this folder in the side bar region 703 A, the user may cause the display in the display region 705 of the results of that search.
  • a user may retrieve a search result automatically by saving the search result into the side bar region 703 A.
  • One mechanism for causing a search result or a search query to be saved into the side bar region 703 A is to select the add folder button 727 which appears in the bottom portion of the window 701 . By selecting this button, the current search result or search query is saved as a list of files and other objects retrieved in the current search result. In the case where the search query is saved for later use rather than the saving of a search result, then the current search query is saved for re-use at a later time in order to find files which match the search query at that later time. The user may select between these two functionalities (saving a search result or saving a search query) by the selection of a command which is not shown.
  • FIGS. 8A and 8B show another aspect of a user interface feature which may be used with certain embodiments of the present invention.
  • the window 801 of FIG. 8A represents a display of the search results which may be obtained as a result of using one of the various different embodiments of the present invention.
  • the search results are separated into categories which are separated by headers 805 , 807 , 809 , and 811 which in this case represent periods of time. This particular segmentation with headers was selected by the user's selecting the heading “date modified” using the date modified button 803 at the top of the window 801 .
  • FIG. 9 shows another aspect of the present invention that is illustrated as part of the window 901 shown in FIG. 9 .
  • This window includes a display region 905 which shows the results of the search and the window also includes two side bar regions 903 A and 903 B, where the side bar region 903 A is the user-configurable portion and the side bar region 903 B is the system controlled portion.
  • a folder add button 927 may be selected by the user to cause the addition of a search result or a search query to be added to the user-configurable portion of the side bar.
  • the window 901 also includes conventional window controls such as a title bar or region 929 which may be used to move the window around a display and view select buttons 937 and maximize, minimize and resize buttons 934 , 935 , and 936 respectively.
  • the window 901 shows a particular manner in which the results of a text-based search may be displayed.
  • a text entry region 909 is used to enter text for searching. This text may be used to search through the metadata files or the indexed files or a combination of both.
  • the display region 905 shows the results of a search for text and includes at least two columns, 917 and 919 , which provide the name of the file that was found and the basis for the match. As shown in column 919 , the basis for the match may be the author field or a file name or a key word or comments or other data fields contained in metadata that was searched.
  • the column 921 shows the text that was found which matches the search parameter typed into the text entry field 909 .
  • Another column 911 provides additional information with respect to the search results. In particular, this column includes the number of matches for each particular type of category or field as well as the total number of matches indicated in the entry 913 . Thus, for example, the total number of matches found for the comments field is only 1, while other fields have a higher number
  • FIG. 10 shows certain other aspects of some embodiments of the present invention.
  • Window 1001 is another search result window which includes various fields and menus for a user to select various search parameters or form a search query.
  • the window 1001 includes a display region 1005 which may be used to display the results of a search and a user-configurable side bar portion 1003 A and a system specified side bar portion 1003 B.
  • the window 1001 includes conventional scrolling controls such as controls 1021 and 1022 and 1021 A.
  • the window further includes conventional controls such as a title bar 1029 which may be used to move the window and view control buttons 1037 and maximize, minimize, and resize buttons 1034 , 1035 , and 1036 .
  • a start search button 1015 is near a text entry region 1009 .
  • a first search parameter menu bar 1007 is displayed adjacent to a second search parameter bar 1011 .
  • the first search parameter search bar 1007 allows a user to specify the location for a particular search while two menu pull down controls in the second search parameter menu bar 1011 allow the user to specify the type of file using the pull down menu 1012 and the time the file was created or last modified using the menu 1013 .
  • the window 1001 includes an additional feature which may be very useful while analyzing a search result.
  • a user may select individual files from within the display region 1005 and associate them together as one collection. Each file may be individually marked using a specific command (e.g. pressing the right button on a mouse and selecting a command from a menu which appears on the screen, which command may be “add selection to current group”) or similar such commands.
  • a specific command e.g. pressing the right button on a mouse and selecting a command from a menu which appears on the screen, which command may be “add selection to current group”
  • the user may associate this group of files into a selected group or a “marked” group and this association may be used to perform a common action on all of the files in the group (e.g. print each file or view each file in a viewer window or move each file to a new or existing folder, etc.).
  • a representation of this marked group appears as a folder in the user-configurable portion 1003 A.
  • An example of such a folder is the folder 1020 shown in the user-configurable portion 1003 A.
  • the user By selecting this folder (e.g. by positioning a cursor over the folder 1020 and pressing and releasing a mouse button or by pressing another button) the user, as a result of this selection, will cause the display within the display region 1005 of the files which have been grouped together or marked.
  • a separate window may appear showing only the items which have been marked or grouped.
  • This association or grouping may be merely temporary or it may be made permanent by retaining a list of all the files which have been grouped and by keeping a folder 1020 or other representations of the grouping within the user-configurable side bar, such as the side bar 1003 A.
  • Certain embodiments may allow multiple, different groupings to exist at the same time, and each of these groupings or associations may be merely temporary (e.g. they exist only while the search results window is displayed), or they may be made permanent by retaining a list of all the files which have been grouped within each separate group. It will be appreciated that the files within each group may have been created from different applications. As noted above, one of the groupings may be selected and then a user may select a command which performs a common action (e.g. print or view or move or delete) on all of the files within the selected group.
  • a common action e.g. print or view or move or delete
  • FIGS. 11A, 11B , 11 C, and 11 D show an alternative user interface for allowing a user to input search queries or search parameters.
  • the user interface shown in these figures appears within the window 1101 which includes a user-configurable side bar region 1103 A and a system specified side bar region 1103 B.
  • the window 1101 also includes traditional window controls such as a window resizing control 1131 which may be dragged in a conventional graphical user interface manner to resize the window, and the window further includes scrolling controls such as controls 1121 , 1122 , and 1123 .
  • the scrolling control 1121 may, for example, be dragged within the scrolling region 1121 A or a scroll wheel on a mouse or other input device may be used to cause scrolling within a display region 1105 .
  • traditional window controls include the title bar 1129 which may be used to move the window around a desktop which is displayed on a display device of a computer system and the window also includes view buttons 1137 as well as close, minimize, and resize buttons 1134 , 1135 and 1136 .
  • a back and forward button, such as the back button 1132 are also provided to allow the user to move back and forth in a manner which is similar to the back and forth commands in a web browser.
  • the window 1101 includes a search parameter menu bar 1111 which includes a “search by” pull down menu 1112 and a “sort by” pull down menu 1114 .
  • the “search by” pull down menu 1112 allows a user to specify the particular search parameter by selecting from the options which appear in the pull down menu once it is activated as shown in FIG. 11B .
  • the pull down menu 1113 shows one example of a pull down menu when the “search by” pull down menu 1112 has been activated.
  • the “sort by” pull down menu 1114 allows a user to specify how the search results are displayed within a display region 1105 . In the example shown in FIGS.
  • a user has used the “sort by” pull down menu 1114 to select the “date viewed” criteria to sort the search results by. It should also be noted that the user may change the type of view of the search results by selecting one of the three view buttons 1137 . For example, a user may select an icon view which is the currently selected button among the view buttons 1137 , or the user may select a list view or a column view.
  • FIG. 11B shows the result of the user's activation of a “search by” pull down menu 1112 which causes the display of the menu 1113 which includes a plurality of options from which the user may choose to perform a search by.
  • a “search by” pull down menu 1112 which causes the display of the menu 1113 which includes a plurality of options from which the user may choose to perform a search by.
  • One way includes the use of a cursor, such as a pointer on a display which is controlled by a cursor control device, such as a mouse.
  • the cursor is positioned over the region associated with the “search by” menu title (which is the portion within the search parameter menu bar 1111 which contains the words “search by”) and then the user indicates the selection of the menu title by pressing a button, such as a mouse's button, to cause the pull down menu to appear, which in this case is the menu 1113 shown in FIG. 11B .
  • a button such as a mouse's button
  • the user may continue to move the cursor to point to a particular option within the menu, such as the “time” option. This may result in the display of a submenu to the left or to the right of the menu 1113 .
  • This submenu may be similar to the submenu 719 A or to the menu 1214 shown in FIG. 12A .
  • the submenu may include a generic list of the different kinds of documents, such as images, photos, movies, text, music, PDF documents, email documents, etc. or the list may include references to specific program names such as PhotoShop, Director, Excel, Word, etc. or it may include a combination of generic names and specific names.
  • FIG. 11C shows the result of the user having selected PhotoShop type of documents from a submenu of the “kind” option shown in menu 1113 . This results in the display of the search parameter menu bar 1111 A shown in FIG. 11C which includes a highlighted selection 1111 B which indicates that the PhotoShop type of documents will be searched for.
  • the search parameter menu bar 1111 appears below the search parameter menu bar 1111 A as shown in FIG.
  • the user may then specify additional search parameters by again using the “search by” pull down menu 112 or by typing text into the text entry field 1109 .
  • the user may select the “search by” pull down menu 1112 causing the display of a menu containing a plurality of options, such as the options shown within the menu 1113 or alternative options such as those which relate to PhotoShop documents (e.g. the various fields in the metadata for PhotoShop type of documents).
  • a combination of such fields contained within metadata for PhotoShop type documents and other generic fields may appear in a menu, such as the menu 1113 which is activated by selecting the “search by” pull down menu.
  • the window 1101 displays a new search parameter menu bar 1115 which allows a user to specify a particular time.
  • the user may select one of the times on the menu bar 1115 or may activate a pull down menu by selecting the menu title “time,” which is shown as the menu title 1116 .
  • the state of the window 1101 shown in FIG. 11D would then search for all PhotoShop documents created in the last 30 days or 7 days or 2 days or today or at any time, depending on the particular time period selected by the user.
  • FIGS. 12A, 12B , 12 C and 12 D show another example of a user interface for allowing the creation of search queries for searching metadata and other data and for displaying the results of the search performed using a search query.
  • the different implementation shown in FIGS. 12A-12D shows a user interface presentation in a column mode; this can be seen by noting the selection of the column button, which is the rightmost button in the view buttons 1237 shown in FIG. 12A .
  • the window 1201 has two columns 1211 and the display region 1205 , while the window 1251 of FIG. 12C has three columns which are columns 1257 , 1259 , and the display region 1255 , and the window 1271 has three columns which are columns 1277 , 1279 , and the display region 1275 .
  • the window 1201 shown in FIGS. 12A and 12B includes a display region 1205 which shows the results of a search; these results may be shown dynamically as the user enters search parameters or the results may be shown only after the user has instructed the system to perform the search (e.g. by selecting a “perform search” command).
  • the window 1201 includes conventional window controls, such as a resizing control 1231 , a scrolling control 1221 , a title bar 1229 which may be used to move the window, a window close button, a window minimize button, and a window resize button 1234 , 1235 , and 1236 , respectively.
  • the window 1201 also includes a user-configurable side bar region 1203 A and a system specified side bar region 1203 B.
  • the window 1201 also includes a text entry region 1209 , which a user may use to enter text for a search, and the window 1201 also includes view selector buttons 1237 .
  • a column 1211 of window 1201 allows a user to select various search parameters by selecting one of the options which in turn causes the display of a submenu that corresponds to the selected option.
  • the user has selected the “kind” option 1212 and then has used the submenu 1214 to select the “photos” option from the submenu, resulting in an indicator 1213 (photos) to appear in the column 1211 under the “kind” option as shown in FIG. 12A .
  • the user has previously selected the “time” option in the column 1211 and has selected from a submenu brought up when the “time” option was selected the “past week” search parameter.
  • FIG. 12B When the user has finished making selections of the various options and suboptions from both the column 1112 and any of the corresponding submenus which appear, then the display showed in FIG. 12B appears. Note that the submenus are no longer present and that the user has completed the selection of the various options and suboptions which specify the search parameters.
  • Column 1211 in FIG. 12B provides feedback to the user indicating the exact nature of the search query (in this case a search for all photos dated in the past week), and the results which match the search query are shown in the display region 1205 .
  • FIGS. 12C and 12D show an alternative embodiment in which the submenus which appear on a temporary basis in the embodiment of FIGS. 12A and 12B are replaced by an additional column which does not disappear after a selection is made.
  • the column 1259 of the window 1251 functions in the same manner as the submenu 1214 except that it remains within the window 1251 after a selection is made (wherein the submenu 1214 is removed from the window after the user makes the selection from the submenu).
  • the column 1279 of window 1271 of FIG. 12D is similar to the column 1259 .
  • the window 1251 includes a side bar which has a user-configurable side bar region 1253 A and a system defined side bar region 1253 B.
  • the system specified side bar region 1253 B includes a “browse” selection region 1254 which has a clear button 1258 which the user may select to clear the current search query.
  • the window 1271 of FIG. 12D provides an alternative interface for clearing the search query.
  • the window 1271 also includes a user configurable side bar region 1273 A and a system specified side bar region 1273 B, but the clear button, rather than being with the “search” region 1274 is at the top of the column 1277 .
  • the user may clear the current search parameter by selecting the button 1283 as shown in FIG. 12D .
  • FIG. 13A shows another embodiment of a window 1301 which displays search results within a display region 1302 .
  • the window 1301 may be a closeable, minimizeable, resizeable, and moveable window having a resizing control 1310 , a title bar 1305 which may be used to move the window, a text entry region 1306 and a user configurable portion 1303 , and a system specified portion 1304 .
  • the window 1301 further includes buttons for selecting various views, including an icon view, a list view, and a column view. Currently, the list view button 1316 has been selected, causing the display of the search results in a list view manner within the display region 1302 .
  • the text (“button”) has been entered into the text entry region 1306 and this has caused the system to respond with the search results shown in the display region 1302 .
  • the user has specified a search in every location by selecting “everywhere” button 1317 . Further, the user has searched for any kind of document by selecting the “kind” option from the pull down menu 1315 and by selecting the “any” option in the pull down menu 1319 .
  • the where or location slice 1307 includes a “+” button which may be used to add further search parameters, and similarly, the slice 1308 includes a “+” and a “ ⁇ ” button for adding or deleting search parameters, respectively.
  • the slice 1307 further includes a “save” button 1309 which causes the current search query to be saved in the form of a folder which is added to the user configurable portion 1303 for use later. This is described further below and may be referred to as a “smart folder.”
  • the search input user interface shown in FIGS. 13A and 13B is available within, in certain embodiments, each and every window controlled by a graphical user interface file management system, such as a Finder program which runs on the Macintosh or Windows Explorer which runs on Microsoft Windows. This interface includes the text entry region 1306 as well as the slices 1307 and 1308 .
  • the window 1301 shown in FIG. 13B shows the activation of a menu by selecting the search button 1323 A, causing a display of a menu having two entries 1323 and 1325 .
  • Entry 1323 displays recently performed searches so that a user may merely recall a prior search by selecting the prior search and cause the prior search to be run again.
  • the menu selection 1325 allows the user to clear the list of recent searches in the menu.
  • FIGS. 14A, 14B , and 14 C show examples of another window in a graphical user interface file system, such as the Finder which runs on the Macintosh operating system. These windows show the results of a particular search and also the ability to save and use a smart folder which saves a prior search.
  • the window 1401 shown in FIG. 14A includes a display region 1403 , a user configurable region 1405 , a smart folder 1406 , a system specified region 1407 , an icon view button 1409 , a list view button 1410 , and a column view button 1411 .
  • the window 1401 also includes a text entry region 1415 and a location slice 1416 which may be used to specify the location for the search, which slice also includes a save button 1417 .
  • Additional slices below the slice 1416 allow the user to specify further details with respect to the search, in this case specifying types of documents which are images which were last viewed this week.
  • the user has set the search parameters in this manner by selecting the “kind” option from the pull down menu 1419 and by selecting the “images” type from the pull down menu 1420 and by selecting the “last viewed” option from pull down menu 1418 and by selecting “this week” from the pull down menu 1422 .
  • the user has also selected “everywhere” by selecting the button 1421 so that the search will be performed on all disks and storage devices connected to this system. The results are shown within the display region 1403 .
  • the user can then save the search query by selecting the “save” button 1417 and may name the saved search query as “this week's images” to produce the smart folder 1406 as shown in the user configurable portion 1405 .
  • This allows the user to repeat this search at a later time by merely selecting the smart folder 1406 which causes the system to perform a new search again, and all data which matches the search criteria will be displayed within the display region 1403 .
  • a repeating of this search by selecting the smart folder 1406 will produce an entirely different list if none of the files displayed in the display region 1403 of FIG. 14A are viewed in the last week from the time in which the next search is performed by selecting the smart folder 1406 .
  • FIG. 14B shows a way in which a user may sort or further search within the search results specified by a saved search, such as a smart folder.
  • a saved search such as a smart folder.
  • the user has selected the smart folder 1406 and has then entered text “jpg” 1425 in the text entry region 1415 . This has caused the system to filter or further limit the search results obtained from the search query saved as the smart folder 1406 .
  • PhotoShop files and other files such as TIF files and GIF files are excluded from the search results displayed within the display region 1403 of FIG. 14B because the user has excluded those files by adding an additional search criteria specified by the text 1425 in the text entry region 1415 .
  • the “jpg” text entry is ANDed logically with the other search parameters to achieve the search results displayed in the display region 1403 .
  • the user has selected the icon view by selecting the icon view button 1409 .
  • FIG. 14C shows the window 1401 and shows the search results displayed within the display region 1403 , where the results are based upon the saved search specified by the smart folder 1406 .
  • the user has caused a pull down menu 1427 to appear by selecting the pull down region 1427 A.
  • the pull down region 1427 includes several options which a user may select. These options include hiding the search criteria or saving the search (which is similar to selecting the button 1417 ) or showing view options or opening the selected file. This allows the user, for example, to hide the search criteria, thereby causing the slice 1416 and the other search parameters to be removed from the window 1401 which is a moveable, resizeable, minimizeable, and closeable window.
  • FIG. 14D shows an example of a user interface which allows the user to specify the appearance of a smart folder, such as the smart folder 1406 .
  • FIG. 15A, 15B , 15 C, and 15 D show an example of a system wide search input user interface and search result user interface.
  • these user interfaces are available on the entire system for all applications which run on the system and all files and metadata, and even address book entries within an address book program, such as a personal information manager, and calendar entries within a calendar program, and emails within an email program, etc.
  • the system begins performing the search and begins displaying the results of the search as the user types text into a text entry field, such as the text entry field 1507 .
  • the search results are organized by categories and are displayed as a short list which is intentionally abbreviated in order to present only a selected number of the most relevant (scored) matches or hits to the search query.
  • FIG. 15A shows a portion of a display controlled by a data processing system. This portion includes a menu bar 1502 which has at its far end a search menu command 1505 .
  • the user can select the search menu command by positioning a cursor, using a mouse, for example, over the search menu command 1505 and by pressing a button or by otherwise activating or selecting a command. This causes a display of a text entry region 1507 into which a user can enter text.
  • a command such as the “show all” command 1509 .
  • FIG. 15A shows a portion of a display controlled by a data processing system. This portion includes a menu bar 1502 which has at its far end a search menu command 1505 .
  • the user can select the search menu command by positioning a cursor, using a mouse, for example, over the search menu command 1505 and by pressing a button or by otherwise activating or selecting a command.
  • This causes a display of a text entry region 1507 into which a user can enter text.
  • FIG. 15A which is a portion of the display, the user has entered the text “shakeit” causing the display of a search result region immediately below a “show all” command region 1509 which is itself immediately below the text entry region 1507 .
  • the hits or matches are grouped into categories (“documents” and “PDF documents”) shown by categories 1511 and 1513 within the search result region 1503 .
  • FIG. 15B shows another example of a search. In this case, a large number of hits was obtained (392 hits), only a few of which are shown in the search result region 1503 . Again, the hits are organized by categories 1511 and 1513 .
  • Each category may be restricted in terms of the number of items displayed within the search result region 1503 in order to permit the display of multiple categories at the same time within the search result region. For example, the number of hits in the documents category may greatly exceed the available display space within the search result region 1503 , but the hits for this category are limited to a predetermined or dynamically determinable number of entries within the search result region 1503 for the category 1511 .
  • An additional category, “top hit” is selected based on a scoring or relevancy using techniques which are known in the art. The user may select the “show all” command 1509 causing the display of a window, such as window 1601 shown in FIG. 16A .
  • FIG. 15C shows a display of a graphical user interface of one embodiment of the invention which includes the menu bar 1502 and the search menu command 1505 on the menu bar 1502 .
  • FIG. 15D shows another example of the search result region 1503 which appeared after a search of the term “safari” was entered into the text entry region 1507 . It can be seen from the search result region 1503 of FIG. 15D that the search results are again grouped into categories. Another search result window 1520 is also shown in the user interface of FIG. 15D . It can be seen that application programs are retrieved as part of the search results, and a user may launch any one of these application programs by selecting it from the search result region, thereby causing the program to be launched.
  • FIGS. 16A and 16B show examples of search result windows which may be caused to appear by selecting the “show all” command 1509 in FIGS. 15A or 15 B. Alternatively, these windows may appear as a result of the user having selected a “find” command or a some other command indicating that a search is desired. Moreover, the window 1601 shown in FIGS. 16A and 16B may appear in response to either of the selection of a show all command or the selection of a find command.
  • the window 1601 includes a text entry region 1603 , a group by menu selection region 1605 , a sort by menu selection region 1607 , and a where menu selection region 1609 .
  • the group by selection region 1605 allows a user to specify the manner in which the items in the search results are grouped according to.
  • the user has selected the “kind” option from the group by menu selection region 1605 , causing the search results to be grouped or sorted according to the kind or type of document or file.
  • the type of file includes “html” files, image files, PDF files, source code files, and other types of files as shown in FIG. 16A .
  • Each type or kind of document is separated from the other documents by being grouped within a section and separated by headers from the other sections.
  • headers 1611 , 1613 , 1615 , 1617 , 1619 , 1621 , and 1623 designate each of the groups and separate one group from the other groups. This allows a user to focus on evaluating the search results according to certain types of documents.
  • the user has specified that the items are to be sorted by date, because the user has selected the date option within the sort by menu region 1607 .
  • the user has also specified that all storage locations are to be searched by selecting “everywhere” from the where menu selection region 1609 .
  • Each item in the search result list includes an information button 1627 which may be selected to produce the display of additional information which may be available from the system. An example of such additional information is shown in FIG.
  • a user has selected the information button 1627 for item 1635 , resulting in the display of an image 1636 corresponding to the item as well as additional information 1637 .
  • the user has selected the information button for another item 1630 to produce the display of an image of the item 1631 as well as additional information 1632 .
  • the user may remove this additional information from the display by selecting the close button 1628 which causes the display of the information for item 1635 to revert to the appearance for that item shown in FIG. 16A .
  • the user may collapse an entire group to hide the entries or search results from that group by selecting the collapse button 1614 shown in FIG. 16A , thereby causing the disappearance of the entries in this group as shown in FIG. 16B .
  • the user may cause these items to reappear by selecting the expand button 1614 A as shown in FIG. 16B to thereby revert to the display of the items as shown in FIG. 16A .
  • FIGS. 16A and 16B presents only a limited number of matches or hits within each category.
  • only the five top (most relevant or most highly sorted) hits are displayed. This can be seen by noticing the entry at the bottom of each list within a group which specifies how many more hits are within that group; these hits can be examined by selecting this indicator, such as indicator 1612 , which causes the display of all of the items in the documents category or kind for the search for “button” which was entered into the text entry region 1603 . Further examples of this behavior are described below and are shown in conjunction with FIGS. 18A and 18B . It will be appreciated that window 1601 is a closeable and resizable and moveable window and includes a close button and a resizing control 1625 A.
  • FIGS. 18A and 18B illustrate another window 1801 which is very similar to the window 1601 .
  • the window 1801 includes a text entry region 1803 , a group by menu selection region 1805 , a sort by menu selection region 1807 , and a where menu selection region 1809 , each of which function in a manner which is similar to the regions 1605 , 1607 , and 1609 respectively of FIG. 16A .
  • Each item in a list view within the window 1801 includes an information button 1827 , allowing a user to obtain additional information beyond that listed for each item shown in the window 1801 .
  • the window 1801 further includes headers 1811 , 1813 , 1815 , 1817 , 1819 , 1821 , and 1823 which separate each group of items, grouped by the type or kind of document, and sorted within each group by date, from the other groups.
  • a collapse button 1814 is available for each of the headers.
  • FIGS. 18A and 18B shows the ability to switch between several modes of viewing the information. For example, the user may display all of the hits within a particular group by selecting the indicator 1812 shown in FIG. 18A which results in the display of all of the images files within the window 1801 within the region 1818 A.
  • the window is scrollable, thereby allowing the user to scroll through all the images.
  • the user can revert back to the listing of only five of the most relevant images by selecting the “show top 5” button 1832 shown in FIG. 18B . Further, the user can select between a list view or an icon view for the images portion shown in FIGS. 18A and 18B .
  • the user may select the list view by selecting the list view button 1830 or may select the icon view by selecting the icon view button 1831 .
  • the list view for the images group is shown in FIG. 16A and the icon view for the images group is shown in FIGS. 18A and 18B . It can be seen that within a single, moveable, resizable, closeable search result window, that there are two different views (e.g. a list view and an icon view) which are concurrently shown within the window.
  • the PDF documents under the header 1819 are displayed in a list view while the images under the header 1817 are displayed in an icon view in FIGS. 18A and 18B .
  • each image is shown with a preview which may be capable of live resizing as described in a patent application entitled “Live Content Resizing” by inventors Steve Jobs, Steve Lemay, Jessica Kahn, Sarah Wilkin, David Hyatt, Jens Alfke, Wayne Loofbourrow, and Bertrand Serlet, filed on the same date as this application, and being assigned to the assignee of the present inventions described herein, and which is hereby incorporated herein by reference.
  • FIG. 19A shows another example of a search result window which is similar to the window 1601 .
  • the window 1901 shown in FIG. 19A includes a text entry region 1903 and a group by menu selection region 1905 and a sort by menu selection region 1907 and a where menu selection region 1908 . Further, the window includes a close button 1925 and a resizing control 1925 A. Text has been entered into the text entry region 1903 to produce the search results shown in the window 1901 .
  • the search results again are grouped by a category selected by a user which in this case is the people options 1906 . This causes the headers 1911 , 1913 , 1915 , and 1917 to show the separation of the groups according to names of people.
  • FIG. 19A shows a user to specify an individual's name and to group by people to look for communications between two people, for example.
  • FIG. 19B shows another way in which a user can group a text search (“imran”) in a manner which is different from that shown in FIG. 19A .
  • the user has selected a flat list from the group by menu selection region 1905 and has selected “people” from the sort by menu region 1907 .
  • the resulting display in window 1901 A is without headers and thus it appears as a flat list.
  • FIG. 19C shows the user interface of another search result window 1930 which includes a text entry region 1903 and the selection regions 1905 , 1907 , and 1908 along with a scrolling control 1926 .
  • the results shown in the window 1930 have been grouped by date and sorted within each group by date.
  • the headers 1932 , 1934 , 1936 , 1938 , and 1940 specify time periods such as when the document was last modified (e.g. last modified today, or yesterday, or last week).
  • the information button 1942 which may be selected to reveal further information, such as an icon 1945 and additional information 1946 as shown for one entry under the today group. This additional information may be removed by selecting the contraction button 1944 .
  • FIG. 19D shows a search result window 1950 in which a search for the text string “te” is grouped by date but the search was limited to a “home” folder as specified in the where menu selection region 1908 .
  • Time specific headers 1952 , 1954 , 1956 , and 1958 separate items within one group from the other groups as shown in FIG. 19D .
  • FIG. 19E shows an alternative embodiment of a search result window.
  • the window 1970 includes elements which are similar to window 1901 such as the selection regions 1905 , 1907 , and a scrolling control 1926 as well as a close button 1925 and a resizing control 1925 A.
  • the search result window 1970 further includes a “when” menu selection region 1972 which allows the user to specify a search parameter based on time in addition to the text entered into the text entry region 1903 . It can be seen from the example shown in FIG. 19E that the user has decided to group the search results by the category and to sort within each group by date. This results in the headers 1973 , 1975 , 1977 , and 1979 as shown in FIG. 19E .
  • FIG. 20 shows an exemplary method of operating a system wide menu for inputting search queries, such as the system wide menu available by selecting the search menu command 1505 shown in FIG. 15A or 15 B, or 15 C.
  • the system displays a system wide menu for inputting search queries. This may be the search menu command 1505 .
  • the user in operation 2003 , inputs a search, and as the search query is being inputted, the system begins performing and begins displaying the search results before the user finishes inputting the search query. This gives immediate feedback and input to the user as the user enters this information.
  • the system is, in operation 2005 , performing a search through files, metadata for the files, emails within an email program, address book entries within an address book program, calendar entries within a calendar program, etc.
  • the system displays an abbreviated (e.g. incomplete) list of hits if there are more than a certain number of hits.
  • An example of this abbreviated listing is shown in FIG. 15B .
  • the listing may be sorted by relevance and segregated into groups such as categories or types of documents.
  • the system receives a command from the user to display all the hits and in operation 2011 the system displays the search results window, such as the window 1601 shown in FIG. 16A .
  • This window may have the ability to display two different types of views, such as an icon view and a list view within the same closeable, resizable, and moveable window.
  • the searching which is performed as the user is typing and the displaying of results as the user is typing may include the searching through the metadata files created from metadata extracted from files created by many different types of software programs.
  • FIGS. 21 , and 22 A, 22 B, 22 C, and 22 D will now be referred to while describing another aspect of the inventions.
  • This aspect relates to a method of selecting a group of files, such as a group of individual data files.
  • a data processing system receives a selection of a plurality of items, such as data files, folders (e.g. graphical user interface representations of subdirectories), application programs or a combination of one or more of these items.
  • This selection may be performed by one of the many conventional ways to select a plurality of items such as (a) positioning a cursor at each item individually (e.g.
  • operation 2101 shown in FIG. 21 receives one or more inputs indicating a selection of a plurality of items.
  • the system in operation 2103 receives a command requesting both the creation of a new storage facility (e.g.
  • operation 2103 may precede operation 2101 .
  • the association of operation 2103 may be a copy or a move operation.
  • the user may select multiple items and then command the system to move those items from their existing locations to a new folder which is created in one operation as a result of the move and create new folder command.
  • the system creates a new storage facility, such as a new folder, with a predetermined directory path name or a user specified path name and the system further associates the selected plurality of items with the new storage facility. This association may be either a move or a copy operation.
  • a copy operation would typically involve making a copy of each selected item and storing the item with a path name that reflects the storage of the item within the new folder having a predetermined directory path name or a user specified directory path name.
  • a move operation in which the items are moved into the new folder, may merely change the path names associated with each of the selected items (rather than making a copy of the items) which changed path names will reflect the new file system location (e.g. within the subdirectory of the new folder) of the selected items.
  • FIGS. 22A-22D show one example of the method of FIG. 21 .
  • a desktop 2201 on a display device is shown containing multiple windows and also an icon 2227 on the desktop.
  • a cursor 2211 is also shown on the desktop.
  • the windows 2203 , 2205 , and 2207 each contain a plurality of items shown as icons.
  • window 2203 includes a data file represented by icon 2215 in a folder (e.g. a graphical representation of a subdirectory in a file storage system) represented by icon 2217 .
  • the window 2205 includes a program icon 2223 and a document icon 2219 and another document icon 2225 and a folder icon 2221 .
  • the window 2207 shows a list view of several files including “File B.”
  • the user may then, using the cursor 2211 or using other conventional user interface techniques, select multiple items. This may be done with one input or more inputs which indicate the selection of multiple items.
  • FIG. 22B shows the result of the user having selected icons 2215 , 2217 , 2223 , 2225 , 2227 , and “File B” in window 2207 . It can be seen that the cursor 2211 is positioned adjacent to the icon 2225 at this point in the operation. Then the user, after having selected a plurality of items, may invoke the command referred to in operation 2103 . An example of this is shown in FIG.
  • option 22C which represents a portion of the desktop 2101 , which portion is designated 2201 A as shown in FIG. 22C .
  • the user has caused a pop up menu 2230 to appear, which pop up menu includes three options 2231 , 2232 , and 2233 .
  • Option 2231 would allow a user to move all the selected items into the trash (e.g. delete them) while options 2232 and 2233 relate to the command referred to in operation 2103 of FIG. 21 .
  • option 2232 is a command which is selectable by the user to create a new folder and, in the same operation, move the items which have been selected into the new folder.
  • Option 2233 is a command which allows the user to, in one operation, create a new folder and copy the selected items into the new folder.
  • the user will select option 2232 , thereby causing the system to create a new storage facility, such as a new folder with a predetermined directory name (e.g. “new folder”) or alternatively, a user specified path name.
  • a new storage facility such as a new folder with a predetermined directory name (e.g. “new folder”) or alternatively, a user specified path name.
  • FIG. 22D shows in which the desktop 2201 now includes a new window labeled “new folder” which represents and shows the contents of this new folder, which is also shown as the folder 2253 which is a graphical user interface representation of this new folder.
  • a window may appear after the command option 2232 or 2233 has been selected, and this window asks for a name for the new folder.
  • This window may display a default name (e.g. “new folder”) in case the user does not enter a new name.
  • the system may merely give the new folder or new storage facility a default path name.
  • the system may merely create the new folder and move or copy the items into the new folder without showing the new window as shown in FIG. 22D .
  • Modern computer operating systems allow different users of the same computer system. These operating systems also allow for the different users to establish ways to protect the privacy of their files such that a first user cannot view contents or modify contents of a second user's files and vice versa if the first and second user take the appropriate steps to limit access. For example, if the first user limits access to the first user's files such that other users cannot read or write to those files or execute the files, then access will be limited to the first user for the first user's files. So, if the second user limits access to the second user's files by setting permissions or other access control features for those files (or one or more files), then read or read and write access or other permutations of access privileges or permissions to the second user's files may be limited.
  • a permission information for each file may also be stored within the metadata for each file (or the indexed content of the file) such that when a search is done and search results are displayed, metadata and files may be protected by access permissions set by each user or by the system. For example, if the search produces a match for a file and its corresponding metadata but the user who owns that file has controlled the access to the file such that only that user can view the file, then a search by another user which matches both the file and the metadata will not reveal the file or the metadata when the search is done by the other user. It will be appreciated that, at least in certain embodiments, the permissions for the metadata of a file may be inherited or otherwise obtained from the permissions for the file itself.
  • FIG. 23 shows one exemplary method in which the privacy of files and the metadata for those files may be protected according to certain aspects of the inventions described herein.
  • the system receives a search query from the first user and performs, in operation 2303 , a search for all possible matches or hits without regard to permissions, such as permissions for the first user.
  • the data processing system determines access permissions for each file for that first user.
  • Access permissions may include a read only access permission or a read and write access permission or an execute access permission in the case of an executable file. Other types of permissions and access statuses and various combinations and permutations of these statuses may be employed.
  • the access permissions are defined on a file by file basis and also apply to the metadata for each corresponding file.
  • the permissions can be defined for a group of files, such as files within a directory.
  • a file for which a permission may be defined may include a user data file, such as a portable document file (PDF) or a word processing file or a spreadsheet file or a drawings file or files which are not executable files, and it may include a directory or a link to a remote file or web site or web page which is stored at a remotely located data processing system.
  • PDF portable document file
  • the access permissions which are determined in operation 2305 are used to filter the matches or hits produced in operation 2303 .
  • the filtering of the hits or matches results in showing only those files for which the user making the query (in this case the first user) is permitted to view. This user is normally the currently logged in user.
  • This method preserves the privacy of files owned by other users and also the privacy of the metadata about those files by not displaying the content of those other files and by not displaying the metadata for those other files for which the user does not have access to view or read.
  • operations 2303 and 2305 may be performed concurrently by structuring a search query which takes into account the access permissions and (through a BOOLEAN AND operator) the search query itself provided by the first user.
  • the filtering may use a permissions cache to filter the files based on access permissions.
  • FIG. 24 shows an alternative method in which the access permissions are determined first in order to select a group of files which are then searched using the search query.
  • the data processing system receives a search query from the current user, and then determines in operation 2403 the access permissions of the current user for each file which in turn determines a selected group or portion of the files on the data processing system.
  • This selected group or portion of files represents those files for which the current user has at least read access permission. All other files on the system cannot be viewed by the current user.
  • operation 2405 is performed in which the search is performed on only those selected files. Those files for which the current user does not have read access are not searched since they were selected out of the group in operation 2403 .
  • the results for this search will then displayed in operation 2407 .
  • the method of FIG. 24 may be advantageous in certain situations, among other reasons, in which users are required to store their files in only certain directories in a directory structure. Files which are stored outside of those directories are not accessible to users which own those directories. For example, if a first user is required to store files only in the first user's directories, and if files stored in other directories are not accessible to the first user, then the method of FIG. 24 can efficiently determine the group of files to which the first user has access and then perform a search on only those files by searching within only the directories which the first user has access to. The method of FIG. 24 may, as with the method of FIG.
  • FIG. 25 shows another exemplary method which shows how the files and the metadata of the files of the first user may be protected and kept private relative to a second user, even when the search queries of the second user match information in the metadata from files of the first user.
  • the data processing system optionally receives a first user's log in information and logs in the first user.
  • a log in process may occur automatically (e.g. a default process was established to assume a certain user always uses the data processing system) or it may occur as a result of an application or operating system program requesting a user to specify at least a user name and optionally a password.
  • Operation 2503 represents a typical use by the first user who may be storing files, such as a new file or modifying an existing file which is stored.
  • a file is stored with define permissions based on the current user and selections of the user. For example, the first user may specify that a certain file is to remain private such that read access or write access is only given to the first user and to no other user.
  • Metadata for the files stored in operation 2503 is also stored in operation 2505 . This metadata may be stored by importing or exporting metadata from the files stored in operation 2503 into a metadata database. When the first user is done, the first user typically logs out in operation 2507 , thereby allowing the second user to log-in in operation 2509 . It will be appreciated that in certain operating systems, it is possible for the two users to be concurrently logged in, although that is not the circumstance of FIG. 25 .
  • the second user After the second user has logged in, the second user stores files with the second user's defined permissions. These new files or modified files are stored with permissions that indicate whether other users may have access to these files.
  • metadata for the files of the second user are also stored in the metadata database.
  • each metadata file or entry for a corresponding user file may include the defined permissions for that particular file.
  • a search query from a second user is received and a data processing system performs in operation 2517 , a search using the search query without regard to permissions. In other words, the search is performed without limiting the search based upon access permissions, such as only those files which may be viewed by the second user.
  • files for which the second user does not have read access are filtered out based on the access permissions for the second user.
  • files that were found in the search in operation 2517 are filtered out based on the access permissions resulting in only those files which match the search criteria and which the second user does have read access to.
  • Results of this search are displayed in operation 2521 .
  • a method of FIG. 25 protects the privacy of both the files and the metadata for the files based on the access permissions of the current user who entered the search query.
  • the method of FIG. 25 may be performed with a metadata base wherein the metadata is obtained from files of different types.
  • the type of information in metadata for a first type of file will differ from a type of information in metadata for a second type of file.
  • the permission and information for each file may be stored within the corresponding metadata file for that file.
  • FIGS. 26 and 27 provided an example of user interfaces which allow a user to set such preferences.
  • Window 5701 shown in FIG. 26 includes a privacy button 5703 and a results button 5705 . These two buttons switch between windows 5701 (which is selected when the privacy button 5703 is activated) and window 5701 a (which is selected and displayed when the results button 5705 has been activated).
  • the window 5701 also includes a list 5705 which displays folders and files which can be added to the list by using the add button 5709 or which can be removed from the list by using the remove button 5711 .
  • Adding a folder to the list 5707 will prevent files contained within those folders from being indexed and thus they will not appear in the search results.
  • the metadata from these files will also not be included in any metadata databases so that searches through metadata will not retrieve these files.
  • a folder may be removed from the list 5707 by selecting the folder and then selecting the remove button 5711 .
  • a folder may be added to the list 5707 by activating the add button 5709 which then causes a file open window to be displayed, from which the user can select a folder or file to be added to the list 5707 .
  • the window 5701 also includes a check box 5713 which allows the user to activate and specify a particular keyboard shortcut.
  • the particular shortcut which is selected may be selected from the pull down menu 5715 .
  • adding a folder to the list 5707 does not prevent the contents of the folder from being indexed or searched, but the contents are not displayed in the search results.
  • the contents of folders in the list 5707 are still indexed and still searched, but they are not displayed in the search results (and thus they are hidden); in a further alternative embodiment, they can be caused to be displayed by the entry of a password or code by the user.
  • the window 5701 a in FIG. 27 is displayed in response to activating the results button 5705 .
  • This window includes a list 5800 , which is a list of the various categories which appear in the search result windows.
  • the check boxes such as check box 5801 , may be checked by a user to indicate that the particular category may appear in search results. If a check box is not selected (e.g. there is no check in the box), then the category will not appear in the search results window (however, for reasons relating to efficiency of indexing, the items within such category will still be indexed, and searched through, even though they do not appear in the search results).
  • the order of the categories may be changed by dragging the categories within the list 5800 .
  • a permissions cache may be used, in certain embodiments, to determine permissions information for files as part of the process of generating a response to a user's search query. For example, a permissions cache may be used to filter files, based on the permissions of the files, after having retrieved a set of files which match a search query. The use of a permissions cache will often allow a system to process a search query and validate permissions faster than another system which does not use a permissions cache.
  • the search software which manages and searches a metadata database and/or a content index database must request another, separate software component, such as the file system software which manages a file system database (which includes the information about file directory structures and permissions information for files in the file system), for the permissions information for files which match the search query.
  • the permissions cache will also often contain the needed permissions information because a user will often search for the same types of documents.
  • a permissions cache has been created over a period of time, it will contain the permissions information for many of the files that a user is interested in and this information will remain valid because many users do not intentionally change the permissions of their files.
  • a permissions cache may contain, for each file having had its permissions cached, at least in certain embodiments, a file identifier and conventional permissions information for the associated file.
  • the file identifier may be a persistent, unique file identification number
  • the conventional permissions information may include read, write and execute permissions for an owner (or other user) of the file as well as read, write and execute permissions for a group (“group permissions”) and also possibly permissions for other users.
  • group permissions Normally, the permissions information is stored on a nonvolatile storage, such as a hard drive or other permanent, mass storage device.
  • the permissions cache may be managed by the search and database software component which maintains and searches the metadata database (e.g. metadata database 415 ) and/or the index database (e.g.
  • the permissions cache may be used to filter or otherwise process search queries or search results. As described further herein, the permissions cache may be deleted in its entirety even if it is only partially invalid or may be deleted, and corrected, only in its portions which are invalid. Notifications from the file system software or operating system kernel may be used to indicate whether portions of the permissions cache are invalid because a permission of a file or directory has changed. These notifications are normally made from the file system software or operating system kernel to the software components which manage and search the metadata database and the index database. These notifications normally identify the file (e.g. by specifying the file's persistent, unique identifier) and indicate that the permissions have changed. These notifications may further include the new permissions information in certain embodiments.
  • notifications may also be the same notifications which, as described herein, indicate that a file has been modified and hence metadata for that file may need to be re-imported into the metadata database (and/or the content of the file needs to be re-indexed and incorporated into the index database); examples of these notifications are described in connection with FIG. 5 .
  • FIG. 28A shows an embodiment in which notifications are used to invalidate an entire permissions cache (even if a permission was changed for only one file). This approach is a conservative approach, but for the many users who rarely, if ever, change a permission of a file, then the permissions cache will rarely, if ever, need to be entirely invalidated.
  • a component such as a software component which manages the permissions cache.
  • This software component may be the software component(s) which manage and search the metadata database and the index database.
  • operation 2803 the entire permissions cache is marked as invalid in response to receiving the one or more notifications, and a new permissions cache is created over time as new searches are performed. Operation 2805 represents this creation of the new permissions cache. The method returns to operation 2801 when any new notifications are received which would require that the entire new permissions cache be invalidated, and the process would repeat.
  • FIG. 28B shows an example of an embodiment which uses a permission cache to validate permissions as part of a search process.
  • the entire permissions cache is invalidated (e.g. as in the method of FIG. 28A ), and it is also assumed that the search criteria is used to perform the search through, for example, a metadata database and/or an index database, without regard to permissions and then the permissions for files found in the search are validated in the rest of the process.
  • the validation of permissions of files and the searching for files matching the search query could be performed concurrently; in other words, as files which match the search query are found, their permissions can be validated while the search, using the search query, continues to look for other files that match the search query.
  • the search query is received and a search is performed. This search is normally done for all possible results (e.g. files which match the search query) without regard to permissions for the files.
  • the state of the permissions cache is determined. The state depends upon the notifications which indicate whether any permissions have changed; these notifications are shown, for example, in FIG. 28A .
  • the component such as a software component, which manages the permissions cache receives the notifications and marks the entire permissions cache as invalid upon receiving the notification. If the permissions cache has been marked as invalid, then it is entirely deleted and a new permissions cache is created (and marked as valid) as new searches are performed, such as in operations 2855 , 2857 , and 2859 . In these operations, the permissions for each file found in the current search being processed are determined and added to the new permissions cache and the results of the search are displayed or otherwise presented, showing only those files which the user has permission to view.
  • the system determines that the permissions cache is valid if no notifications (as in FIG. 28A ) have been received since the existing permissions cache was first created. If the existing permissions cache is valid, then processing proceeds to operation 2861 in which it is determined whether the file's permissions information is within the permission cache. If the permissions information for the current file being processed is within the permissions cache, then processing proceeds to operation 2867 . If the permissions information is not within the permissions cache, then operations 2863 and 2865 follow operation 2861 , and in operations 2863 and 2865 the permissions for the file are determined (e.g.
  • the software component managing the permissions cache sends a request to the file system software which searches its file system database to obtain the permissions information and then passes this information back to the software component) and are added to the permissions cache for this file.
  • the permissions information for the file are examined, using the permissions cache, and it is determined, in operation 2867 , whether the user will be given access to the file (which may be metadata for a file or the file itself or both) based on the permissions information and who the user is.
  • results of the search are displayed. It will be appreciated that the results may be displayed as each file has its permissions validated (e.g. after operation 2867 ) rather than after determining that all searched and found files have had their permissions validated.
  • FIG. 29A shows an embodiment in which notifications are used to invalidate only an invalid portion of the permissions cache rather than the entire permissions cache. This approach may be appropriate where it is anticipated that a user will often change permissions of one or more files.
  • a component such as a software component, which manages the permissions cache.
  • This software component may be the software component(s) which manage and search the metadata database and the index database.
  • those portions of the permissions cache which are identified in the notifications from operation 2901 are marked as invalid. Typically, if there is an entry in the permissions cache for the file identified in the notification, then the entry is marked as invalid.
  • the permissions information, for a file marked as invalid in the permissions cache is updated when processing search results which include the file in the results; this is described further below.
  • the permissions information for the file marked as invalid may be updated at the time of the notification rather than when, at a later time, a future search result includes the file.
  • the permissions information in the permission cache for the file may be updated upon receiving the notification if the notification includes the necessary changes or the entire permissions information for the file.
  • FIG. 29B shows an example of another embodiment which uses a permission cache to validate permissions as part of a search process.
  • a permissions cache is invalidated upon receiving a notification, such as in the example shown in FIG. 29A .
  • the validation of permissions of files and the searching for files matching the search query could be performed concurrently; in other words, as files, which match the search query, are found, their permissions can be validated while the search, using the search query, continues to look for other files that match the search query.
  • the search query is received and a search is performed. This search is normally done for all possible results (e.g. files which match the search query) without regard to permissions for the files.
  • operation 2953 it is determined whether, for the current file being processed, its permissions information is stored within the permissions cache. If it is so stored, then processing proceeds to operation 2955 , in which it is determined whether the permissions information, in the permissions cache, for the file is valid. If it is valid, then processing proceeds to operation 2961 . If in operation 2953 , it is determined that there is no permissions information for the file then processing proceeds to operation 2957 . If operation 2955 determines that the permissions information, in the permissions cache, is invalid, then processing proceeds to operation 2957 . In operation 2957 , the permissions information for the file are determined (e.g.
  • Operation 2961 follows either operations 2959 or 2955 , and it examines the permissions information, using the permissions cache, and determines, for the current user, whether the user will be given access to the file (which may be metadata for a file or the file itself or both) based on the permissions information and who the user is.
  • operation 2963 it is determined whether there are further files, retrieved by the search query, which require validation of permissions; if there are such files, then processing returns to operation 2953 and continues as described above.
  • results of the search are displayed. It will be appreciated that the results may be displayed as each file has its permissions validated (e.g. after operation 2961 ) rather than after determining that all searched and found files have had their permissions validated.
  • the software managing permissions filtering for the search engine(s) may create multiple permissions caches, such as one permissions cache for each user account. These caches are processed in a similar manner described herein and are used for their corresponding user.

Abstract

Systems and methods for managing data, such as metadata. In one exemplary method, a search is performed based on a search query of at least metadata of a first plurality of files and a set of a permissions is determined for a first user, wherein the set of permissions defines at least a right to view information. Results of the search are displayed based upon the set of permissions. In the metadata database, there is metadata from a number of files of different types. The type of information in metadata for a first type of file differs from a type of information in metadata for a second type of file.

Description

  • This application is a continuation-in-part of co-pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/877,584, filed on Jun. 25, 2004. This application also claims priority to co-pending U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 60/643,087 filed on Jan. 7, 2005, which provisional application is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety; this application claims the benefit of the provisional's filing date under 35 U.S.C. § 19(e). This present application hereby claims the benefit of these earlier filing dates under 35 U.S.C. §120.
  • BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
  • Modern data processing systems, such as general purpose computer systems, allow the users of such systems to create a variety of different types of data files. For example, a typical user of a data processing system may create text files with a word processing program such as Microsoft Word or may create an image file with an image processing program such as Adobe's PhotoShop. Numerous other types of files are capable of being created or modified, edited, and otherwise used by one or more users for a typical data processing system. The large number of the different types of files that can be created or modified can present a challenge to a typical user who is seeking to find a particular file which has been created.
  • Modern data processing systems often include a file management system which allows a user to place files in various directories or subdirectories (e.g. folders) and allows a user to give the file a name. Further, these file management systems often allow a user to find a file by searching for the file's name, or the date of creation, or the date of modification, or the type of file. An example of such a file management system is the Finder program which operates on Macintosh computers from Apple Computer, Inc. of Cupertino, Calif. Another example of a file management system program is the Windows Explorer program which operates on the Windows operating system from Microsoft Corporation of Redmond, Wash. Both the Finder program and the Windows Explorer program include a find command which allows a user to search for files by various criteria including a file name or a date of creation or a date of modification or the type of file. However, this search capability searches through information which is the same for each file, regardless of the type of file. Thus, for example, the searchable data for a Microsoft Word file is the same as the searchable data for an Adobe PhotoShop file, and this data typically includes the file name, the type of file, the date of creation, the date of last modification, the size of the file and certain other parameters which may be maintained for the file by the file management system.
  • Certain presently existing application programs allow a user to maintain data about a particular file. This data about a particular file may be considered metadata because it is data about other data. This metadata for a particular file may include information about the author of a file, a summary of the document, and various other types of information. A program such as Microsoft Word may automatically create some of this data when a user creates a file and the user may add additional data or edit the data by selecting the “property sheet” from a menu selection in Microsoft Word. The property sheets in Microsoft Word allow a user to create metadata for a particular file or document. However, in existing systems, a user is not able to search for metadata across a variety of different applications using one search request from the user. Furthermore, existing systems can perform one search for data files, but this search does not also include searching through metadata for those files.
  • SUMMARY OF THE DESCRIPTION
  • Methods for managing data in a data processing system and systems for managing data are described herein.
  • These methods and system provide ways to protect the privacy of files and/or metadata for the files based on user (and/or system) defined access permissions.
  • In one aspect of the inventions described herein, an exemplary method of processing data includes receiving a search query from a first user, and performing a search, based on a search query, of at least metadata of a first plurality of files, determining a set of permissions for the first user, which set of permissions define at least a right to view information, wherein the type of information in metadata for files of a first type differs from a type of information in metadata for files of the second type. In certain embodiments, the set of permissions prevents the display of information about a first set of files and metadata for the first set of files for which the first user does not have access to view and wherein the search is performed without regard to the set of permissions, but results of the search are filtered to provide the displayed results.
  • According to another aspect of the invention described herein, an exemplary method includes receiving a search query from a first user having a set of permissions defined relative to at least a set of files within a first plurality of files accessible on the data processing system, and performing a search using a search query, wherein the search is not limited by the set of permissions of the first user, and the search produces a first set of files matching the search query, and filtering, after the search, the first set of files with the set of permissions to produce the second set of files for which the first user has permission to access. In a typical implementation of this exemplary method, the first set of files includes files which represent metadata for other files included within the first set of files, and some of the metadata for which the first user does not have permission to access is filtered out as part of the filtering, thereby preventing the first user from having access to such metadata. In certain exemplary implementations of this method, the filtering may use a permissions cache which includes permission information for files which have been found from prior search queries (e.g. the files matched prior search queries and thus were “hits” and their identification information, such as a unique, persistent identifier, and their permission information were saved in the permission cache for use in filtering of future searches). The permissions cache will often have the necessary information about at least some of the files matching the search query and thus the search software can avoid having to request permissions information for all files matching the search query. This use of a permissions cache will improve the speed of filtering because, typically, fewer requests to the file system software which maintains file system information, including the permissions information, will be required. In other words, rather than requesting permissions information for every file which matches the current search query, the request for permissions information (e.g. a request from the software searching the metadata database and the content index database to the file system software) can be limited to files which have not had their permissions information stored in the permissions cache.
  • In an exemplary embodiment which uses a permissions cache, an exemplary method includes receiving a search query from a user having a set of permissions defined relative to at least a set of files within a plurality of files accessible on the data processing system and performing a search using the search query, wherein the search is not limited by the set of permissions and the search produces a first set of files matching the search query, and determining a state of at least a portion of a permissions cache, and filtering, either after the search or as the search is being performed, the first set of files with at least those portions of the permissions cache which are determined to be valid. The filtering uses, to the extent that the portions of the permissions cache are valid, the permissions information in the permissions cache to determine which files can be displayed to the user who inputted the search query. To the extent that the permissions cache is invalid, a method may either look up the permissions of files having known invalid permissions information in the permissions cache (and use the permissions information in the permissions cache for those files having valid permission information in the cache) or may discard the entire permissions cache and build a new permissions cache as new searches are performed. After the filtering process, the system presents in a display the files matching the search query and matching the permissions criteria of the user.
  • It will be appreciated that the searching for files which match a search query and the validation of permissions for those files may occur concurrently; for example, as files, which match the search query, are found in the searching process, their permissions can be examined to determine whether the user can view or otherwise get access to the files while the search, using the search query, continues to look for other files that match the search query.
  • Other aspects of the present invention include various data processing systems which perform these methods and machine readable media which perform various methods described herein.
  • BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
  • The present invention is illustrated by way of example and not limitation in the figures of the accompanying drawings in which like references indicate similar elements.
  • FIG. 1 shows an exemplary embodiment of a data processing system, which may be a general purpose computer system and which may operate in any of the various methods described herein.
  • FIG. 2 shows a general example of one exemplary method of one aspect of the invention.
  • FIG. 3A shows an example of the content of the particular type of metadata for a particular type of file.
  • FIG. 3B shows another example of a particular type of metadata for another particular type of file.
  • FIG. 4 shows an example of an architecture for managing metadata according to one exemplary embodiment of the invention.
  • FIG. 5 is a flowchart showing another exemplary method of the present invention.
  • FIG. 6 shows an example of a storage format which utilizes a flat file format for metadata according to one exemplary embodiment of the invention.
  • FIGS. 7A-7E show a sequence of graphical user interfaces provided by one exemplary embodiment in order to allow searching of metadata and/or other data in a data processing system.
  • FIGS. 8A and 8B show two examples of formats for displaying search results according to one exemplary embodiment of the invention.
  • FIG. 9 shows another exemplary user interface of the present invention.
  • FIG. 10 shows another exemplary user interface of the present invention.
  • FIGS. 11A-11D show, in sequence, another exemplary user interface according to the present invention.
  • FIGS. 12A-12D show alternative embodiments of user interfaces according to the present invention.
  • FIGS. 13A and 13B show further alternative embodiments of user interfaces according to the present invention.
  • FIGS. 14A, 14B, 14C, and 14D show further alternative embodiments of user interfaces according to the present invention.
  • FIGS. 15A, 15B, 15C and 15D show another alternative embodiment of user interfaces according to the present invention.
  • FIGS. 16A and 16B show certain aspects of embodiments of user interfaces according to the present invention.
  • FIG. 17 shows an aspect of certain embodiments of user interfaces according to the present invention.
  • FIGS. 18A and 18B show further aspects of certain embodiments of user interfaces according to the present invention.
  • FIGS. 19A, 19B, 19C, 19D, and 19E show further illustrative embodiments of user interfaces according to the present invention.
  • FIG. 20 is a flow chart which illustrates another exemplary method of the present invention.
  • FIG. 21 is a flow chart showing another exemplary method of the present invention.
  • FIGS. 22A, 22B, 22C, and 22D illustrate the display of a display device on which an embodiment of the method of FIG. 21 is performed.
  • FIG. 23 is a flow chart which illustrates an exemplary method according to certain aspects of the inventions.
  • FIG. 24 is a flow chart which illustrates another exemplary method according to certain aspects of the inventions described herein.
  • FIG. 25 is a flow chart which illustrates a further more specific exemplary method according to certain aspects of the inventions.
  • FIGS. 26 and 27 provide an example of user interfaces which allow a user to set preferences with respect to how information is kept private and how information is displayed in response to searches.
  • FIG. 28A is a flowchart which illustrates another exemplary method according to certain embodiments of the inventions in which a permissions cache is used.
  • FIG. 28B is a flowchart which illustrates another exemplary method which includes the use of a permissions cache.
  • FIGS. 29A and 29B are flowcharts which illustrate other exemplary methods which include the use of a permissions cache.
  • DETAILED DESCRIPTION
  • The subject invention will be described with reference to numerous details set forth below, and the accompanying drawings will illustrate the invention. The following description and drawings are illustrative of the invention and are not to be construed as limiting the invention. Numerous specific details are described to provide a thorough understanding of the present invention. However, in certain instances, well known or conventional details are not described in order to not unnecessarily obscure the present invention in detail.
  • The present description includes material protected by copyrights, such as illustrations of graphical user interface images. The owners of the copyrights, including the assignee of the present invention, hereby reserve their rights, including copyright, in these materials. The copyright owner has no objection to the facsimile reproduction by anyone of the patent document or the patent disclosure, as it appears in the Patent and Trademark Office file or records, but otherwise reserves all copyrights whatsoever. Copyright Apple Computer, Inc. 2004.
  • FIG. 1 shows one example of a typical computer system which may be used with the present invention. Note that while FIG. 1 illustrates various components of a computer system, it is not intended to represent any particular architecture or manner of interconnecting the components as such details are not germane to the present invention. It will also be appreciated that network computers and other data processing systems which have fewer components or perhaps more components may also be used with the present invention. The computer system of FIG. 1 may, for example, be a Macintosh computer from Apple Computer, Inc.
  • As shown in FIG. 1, the computer system 101, which is a form of a data processing system, includes a bus 102 which is coupled to a microprocessor(s) 103 and a ROM (Read Only Memory) 107 and volatile RAM 105 and a non-volatile memory 106. The microprocessor 103 may be a G3 or G4 microprocessor from Motorola, Inc. or one or more G5 microprocessors from IBM. The bus 102 interconnects these various components together and also interconnects these components 103, 107, 105, and 106 to a display controller and display device 104 and to peripheral devices such as input/output (1/O) devices which may be mice, keyboards, modems, network interfaces, printers and other devices which are well known in the art. Typically, the input/output devices 109 are coupled to the system through input/output controllers 108. The volatile RAM (Random Access Memory) 105 is typically implemented as dynamic RAM (DRAM) which requires power continually in order to refresh or maintain the data in the memory. The mass storage 106 is typically a magnetic hard drive or a magnetic optical drive or an optical drive or a DVD RAM or other types of memory systems which maintain data (e.g. large amounts of data) even after power is removed from the system. Typically, the mass storage 106 will also be a random access memory although this is not required. While FIG. 1 shows that the mass storage 106 is a local device coupled directly to the rest of the components in the data processing system, it will be appreciated that the present invention may utilize a non-volatile memory which is remote from the system, such as a network storage device which is coupled to the data processing system through a network interface such as a modem or Ethernet interface. The bus 102 may include one or more buses connected to each other through various bridges, controllers and/or adapters as is well known in the art. In one embodiment the I/O controller 108 includes a USB (Universal Serial Bus) adapter for controlling USB peripherals and an IEEE 1394 controller for IEEE 1394 compliant peripherals.
  • It will be apparent from this description that aspects of the present invention may be embodied, at least in part, in software. That is, the techniques may be carried out in a computer system or other data processing system in response to its processor, such as a microprocessor, executing sequences of instructions contained in a memory, such as ROM 107, RAM 105, mass storage 106 or a remote storage device. In various embodiments, hardwired circuitry may be used in combination with software instructions to implement the present invention. Thus, the techniques are not limited to any specific combination of hardware circuitry and software nor to any particular source for the instructions executed by the data processing system. In addition, throughout this description, various functions and operations are described as being performed by or caused by software code to simplify description. However, those skilled in the art will recognize what is meant by such expressions is that the functions result from execution of the code by a processor, such as the microprocessor 103.
  • Capturing and Use of Metadata Across a Variety of Application Programs
  • FIG. 2 shows a generalized example of one embodiment of the present invention. In this example, captured metadata is made available to a searching facility, such as a component of the operating system which allows concurrent searching of all metadata for all applications having captured metadata (and optionally for all non-metadata of the data files). The method of FIG. 2 may begin in operation 201 in which metadata is captured from a variety of different application programs. This captured metadata is then made available in operation 203 to a searching facility, such as a file management system software for searching. This searching facility allows, in operation 205, the searching of metadata across all applications having captured metadata. The method also provides, in operation 207, a user interface of a search engine and the search results which are obtained by the search engine. There are numerous possible implementations of the method of FIG. 2. For example, FIG. 5 shows a specific implementation of one exemplary embodiment of the method of FIG. 2. Alternative implementations may also be used. For example, in an alternative implementation, the metadata may be provided by each application program to a central source which stores the metadata for use by searching facilities and which is managed by an operating system component, which may be, for example, the metadata processing software. The user interface provided in operation 207 may take a variety of different formats, including some of the examples described below as well as user interfaces which are conventional, prior art user interfaces. The metadata may be stored in a database which may be any of a variety of formats including a B tree format or, as described below, in a flat file format according to one embodiment of the invention.
  • The method of FIG. 2 may be implemented for programs which do not store or provide metadata. In this circumstance, a portion of the operating system provides for the capture of the metadata from the variety of different programs even though the programs have not been designed to provide or capture metadata. For those programs which do allow a user to create metadata for a particular document, certain embodiments of the present invention may allow the exporting back of captured metadata back into data files for applications which maintain metadata about their data files.
  • The method of FIG. 2 allows information about a variety of different files created by a variety of different application programs to be accessible by a system wide searching facility, which is similar to the way in which prior art versions of the Finder or Windows Explorer can search for file names, dates of creation, etc. across a variety of different application programs. Thus, the metadata for a variety of different files created by a variety of different application programs can be accessed through an extension of an operating system, and an example of such an extension is shown in FIG. 4 as a metadata processing software which interacts with other components of the system and will be described further below.
  • FIGS. 3A and 3B show two different metadata formats for two different types of data files. Note that there may be no overlap in any of the fields; in other words, no field in one type of metadata is the same as any field in the other type of metadata. Metadata format 301 may be used for an image file such as a JPEG image file. This metadata may include information such as the image's width, the image's height, the image's color space, the number of bits per pixel, the ISO setting, the flash setting, the F/stop of the camera, the brand name of the camera which took the image, user-added keywords and other fields, such as a field which uniquely identifies the particular file, which identification is persistent through modifications of the file. Metadata format 331 shown in FIG. 3B may be used for a music file such as an MP3 music file. The data in this metadata format may include an identification of the artist, the genre of the music, the name of the album, song names in the album or the song name of the particular file, song play times or the song play time of a particular song and other fields, such as a persistent file ID number which identifies the particular MP3 file from which the metadata was captured. Other types of fields may also be used. The following chart shows examples of the various fields which may be used in metadata for various types of files.
    Copied
    Item Parent in Multi- User with App
    name hierarchy Attribute name Description/Notes CFType value Localized settable Gettable copy viewable
    Item n/a Authors Who created or CFString Yes No Yes Yes Yes Address
    contributed to the Book
    contents of this item
    Comment A free form text CFString No No Yes Yes Yes
    comment
    ContentType This is the type that is CFString No ? No Yes Yes
    determined by UTI
    ContentTypes This is the inheritance of CFString Yes ? No Yes Yes
    the UTI system
    CreatedDate When was this item CFDate No No No Yes Yes
    created
    DisplayName The name of the item as CFString No Yes Yes Yes Yes Finder (or
    the user would like to Launch
    read it. Very well may Services)
    be the file name, but it
    may also be the subject
    of an e-mail message or
    the full name of a
    person, for example.
    Keywords This is a list words set CFString Yes System- Yes Yes Ask
    by the user to identify provided
    arbitrary sets of keywords
    organization. The scope (if any)
    is determined by the
    user and can be flexibly
    used for any kind of
    organization. For
    example, Family,
    Hawaii, Project X, etc.
    Contact A list of contacts that CFString Yes No Yes Yes Ask Address
    Keywords are associated with this Book
    document, beyond what
    is captured as Author.
    This may be a person
    who's in the picture or a
    document about a
    person or contact
    (performance review,
    contract)
    ModifiedDate When this item was last CFDate No No No Yes
    modified
    Rating A relative rating (0 to 5 CFNumber No n/a Yes Yes
    value) on how important
    a particular item is to
    you, whether it's a
    person, file or message
    RelatedTos A list of other items that CFString Yes No Yes Yes
    are arbitrarily grouped
    together.
    TextContent An indexed version of CFString No No No Yes
    any content text
    UsedDates Which days was the CFDate Yes No No Yes
    document
    opened/viewed/played
    Content/ Item Copyright Specifies the owner of CFString No No Yes Yes
    Data this content, i.e.
    Copyright Apple
    Computer, Inc.
    CreatorApp Keeps track of the CFString No ? No Yes
    application that was
    used to create this
    document (if it's
    known).
    Languages The languages that this CFString Yes Yes Yes Yes
    document is composed
    in (for either text or
    audio-based media)
    ParentalControl A field that is used to CFString No ? Yes Yes
    determine whether this
    is kid-friendly content or
    not
    Publishers The name or a person or CFString Yes No Yes Yes Address
    organization that Book
    published this content.
    PublishedDate The original date that CFDate No No Yes Yes
    this content was
    published (if it was),
    independent of created
    date.
    Reviewers A list of contacts who CFString Yes No Yes Yes Address
    have reviewed the Book
    contents of this file.
    This would have to be
    set explicitly by an
    application.
    ReviewStatus Free form text that used CFString No ? Yes Yes
    to specify where the
    document is in any
    arbitrary review process
    TimeEdited Total time spent editing CFDate No No No Yes
    document
    WhereTos Where did this go to, eg. CFString Yes System- ? Yes
    CD, printed, backedup provided
    words
    only (if
    any)
    WhereFroms Where did this come CFString Yes System- ? Yes
    from, e.g. camera, email, provided
    web download, CD words
    only (if
    any)
    Image Data BitsPerSample What is the bit depth of CFNumber No Yes
    the image (8-bit, 16-bit,
    etc.)
    ColorSpace What color space model CFString No Yes ColorSync
    is this document Utility?
    following
    ImageHeight The height of the image CFNumber No Yes
    in pixels
    ImageWidth The width of the image CFNumber No Yes
    in pixels
    ProfileName The name of the color CFString No Yes ColorSync
    profile used with for Utility?
    image
    ResolutionWidth Resolution width of this CFNumber No Yes
    image (i.e. dpi from a
    scanner)
    ResolutionHeight Resolution height of this CFNumber No Yes
    image (i.e. dpi from a
    scanner)
    LayerNames For image formats that CFString Yes Yes
    contain “named” layers
    (e.g. Photoshop files)
    Aperture The f-stop rating of the CFNumber No Yes
    camera when the image
    was taken
    CameraMake The make of the camera CFString No Yes Yes
    that was used to acquire
    this image (e.g. Nikon)
    CameraModel The model of the camera CFString No Yes Yes
    used to acquire this
    image (Coolpix 5700)
    DateTimeOriginal Date/time the picture CFDate No Yes
    was taken
    ExposureMode Mode that was used for CFString No Yes
    the exposure
    ExposureTime Time that the lens was CFDate No Yes
    exposed while taking the
    picture
    Flash This attribute is CFNumber No Yes
    overloaded with
    information about red-
    eye reduction. This is
    not a binary value
    GPS Raw value received CFString No Yes
    from GPS device
    associated with photo
    acquisition. It hasn't
    necessarily been
    translated to a user-
    understandable location.
    ISOSpeed The ISO speed the CFNumber No Yes
    camera was set to when
    the image was acquired
    Orientation The orientation of the CFString No Yes
    camera when the image
    was acquired
    WhiteBalance The white balance CFNumber No Yes
    setting of the camera
    when the picture was
    taken
    EXIFversion The version of EXIF CFString No Yes
    that was used to
    generate the metadata
    for the image
    Time- Data Acquisition- The name or type of CFString Yes Yes
    based Sources device that used to
    acquire the media
    Codecs The codecs used to CFString Yes Yes
    encode/decode the
    media
    DeliveryType FastStart or RTSP CFString No Yes
    Duration The length of time that CFNumber No Yes
    the media lasts
    Streamable Whether the content is CFBoolean No Yes
    prepared for purposes of
    streaming
    TotalBitRate The total bit rate (audio CFNumber No Yes
    & video combined) of
    the media.
    AudioBitRate The audio bit rate of the CFNumber No Yes
    media
    AspectRatio The aspect ratio of the CFString No Yes
    video of the media
    ColorSpace The color space model CFString No Yes
    used for the video aspect
    of the media
    FrameHeight The frame height in CFNumber No Yes
    pixels of the video in the
    media
    FrameWidth The frame width in CFNumber No Yes
    pixels of the video in the
    media
    ProfileName The name of the color CFString No Yes
    profile used on the video
    portion of the media
    VideoBitRate The bit rate of the video CFNumber No Yes
    aspect of the media
    Text Data Subject The subject of the text. CFString No Yes
    This could be metadata
    that's supplied with the
    text or something
    automatically generated
    with technologies like
    VTWIN
    PageCount The number of printable CFNumber No Yes
    pages of the document
    LineCount The number of lines in CFNumber No Yes
    the document
    WordCount The number of words in CFNumber No Yes
    the document
    URL The URL that will get CFString No Yes
    you to this document (or
    at least did at one time).
    Relevant for saved
    HTML documents,
    bookmarks, RSS feeds,
    etc.
    PageTitle The title of a web page. CFString No Yes
    Relevant to HTML or
    bookmark documents
    Google Structure of where this CFString No Yes
    Hierarchy page can be found in the
    Google hierarchy.
    Relevant to HTML or
    bookmark documents
    Compound Data <Abstract> There are no specific n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a
    document attributes assigned to
    this item. This is to
    catch all app-specific
    file formats that fall
    within Data, but don't fit
    into any of the other
    types. Typically these
    documents have
    multiple types of media
    embedded within them.
    (e.g. P
    PDF Compound NumberOfPages The number of printable CFNumber No Yes
    document pages in the document
    PageSize The size of the page CFNumber No No Yes
    stored as points
    PDFTitle PDF-specific title CFString No ? Yes
    metadata for the
    document
    PDFAuthor PDF-specific author CFString No ? Yes Address
    metadata for the Book
    document
    PDFSubject PDF-specific subject CFString No ? Yes
    metadata for the
    document
    PDFKeywords PDF-specific keywords CFString Yes ? Yes
    metadata for the
    document
    PDFCreated PDF-specific created CFDate No ? Yes
    metadata for the
    document
    PDFModified PDF-specific modified CFDate No ? Yes
    metadata for the
    document
    PDFVersion PDF-specific version CFString No ? Yes
    metadata for the
    document
    SecurityMethod Method by which this CFString No Yes
    document is kept secure
    Presentation Compound SlideTitles A collection of the titles CFString Yes Yes
    (Keynote) document on slides
    SlideCount The number of slides CFString No Yes
    SpeakerNotes- The content of all the CFString ? Yes
    Content speaker notes from all of
    the slides together
    Application Item Categories The kind of application CFString Yes Yes
    this is: productivity,
    games, utility, graphics,
    etc. A set list that
    Message Item Recipients Maps to To and Cc: CFString Yes Yes Address
    addresses in a mail Book
    message.
    Priority The priority of the CFString No Yes
    message as set by the
    sender
    Attachment- The list of filenames that CFString Yes Yes
    Names represent attachments in
    a particular message
    (should be actionable
    within the Finder)
    Authors maps to From address in CFString Yes No Yes Yes Yes Address
    mail message Book
    Comment Not applicable to Mail CFString No No Yes Yes Yes
    right now (should we
    consider?)
    ContentType CFString No No Yes Yes
    ContentTypes CFString Yes No Yes Yes
    CreatedDate When was this message CFDate No No No Yes Yes
    was sent or received
    DisplayName Subject of the message CFString No Yes Yes Yes Yes
    Keywords There will be a way to CFString Yes System- Yes Yes Ask
    set keywords within provided
    Mail keywords
    (if any)
    Contact Could be where CFString Yes No Yes Yes Ask Address
    Keywords recipients are held Book
    ModifiedDate Not applicable CFDate No No No Yes
    Rating A relative rating (0 to 5 CFNumber No n/a Yes Yes
    stars) on how important
    a particular message is
    to you (separate from a
    message's Priority)
    RelatedTos Potentially threaded CFString Yes No Yes Yes
    messages could be put
    into this category
    TextContent An indexed version of CFString No No No Yes
    the mail message
    UsedDates The day/time in which CFDate Yes No No Yes
    the mail message was
    viewed/read
    Contact Item Company The company that this CFString No Yes Address
    contact is an employee Book
    of
    E-mails A list of e-mail CFString Yes Yes Mail
    addresses that this
    contact has
    IMs A list of instant message CFString Yes Yes iChat
    handles this contact has
    Phones A list of phone numbers CFString Yes
    that relate to this contact
    Addresses A list of physical CFString Yes
    addresses that relate to
    this person
    Authors the name of the owner of CFString Yes No Yes Yes Yes Address
    the Address Book Book
    (current user name)
    Comment CFString No No Yes Yes Yes
    ContentType CFString No No Yes Yes
    ContentTypes CFString Yes No Yes Yes
    CreatedDate date the user entered this CFDate No No No Yes Yes
    into his AddressBook
    (either through import or
    direct entry)
    DisplayName Composite name of CFString No Yes Yes Yes Yes
    contact (First Name,
    Last Name)
    Keywords There will be a way to CFString Yes System- Yes Yes Ask
    set keywords within provided
    Address Book keywords
    (if any)
    Contact CFString Yes No Yes Yes Ask Address
    Keywords Book
    ModifiedDate Last time this contact CFDate No No No Yes
    entry was modified
    Rating A relative rating (0 to 5 CFNumber No n/a Yes Yes
    stars) on how important
    a particular contact is to
    you (separate from a
    message's Priority)
    RelatedTos (potentially could be CFString Yes No Yes Yes
    used to associate people
    from the same company
    or family)
    TextContent An indexed version of CFString No No No Yes
    the Notes section
    UsedDates The day/time in which CFDate Yes No No Yes
    the contact entry was
    viewed in Address Book
    Meeting Item Body text, rich text or CFString No Yes
    (TBD) document that represents
    the full content of the
    event
    Description text describing the event CFString No Yes
    EventTimes time/date the event starts CFDate Yes Yes
    Duration The length of time that CFNumber No Yes
    the meeting lasts
    Invitees The list of people who CFString Yes Yes Address
    are invited to the Book
    meeting
    Location The name of the location CFString No Yes
    where the meeting is
    taking place
  • One particular field which may be useful in the various metadata formats would be a field which includes an identifier of a plug in or other software element which may be used to capture metadata from a data file and/or export metadata back to the creator application.
  • Various different software architectures may be used to implement the functions and operations described herein. The following discussion provides one example of such an architecture, but it will be understood that alternative architectures may also be employed to achieve the same or similar results. The software architecture shown in FIG. 4 is an example which is based upon the Macintosh operating system. The architecture 400 includes a metadata processing software 401 and an operating system (OS) kernel 403 which is operatively coupled to the metadata processing software 401 for a notification mechanism which is described below. The metadata processing software 401 is also coupled to other software programs such as a file system graphical user interface software 405 (which may be the Finder), an email software 407, and other applications 409. These applications are coupled to the metadata processing software 401 through client application program interface 411 which provide a method for transferring data and commands between the metadata processing software 401 and the software 405, 407, and 409. These commands and data may include search parameters specified by a user as well as commands to perform searches from the user, which parameters and commands are passed to the metadata processing software 401 through the interface 411. The metadata processing software 401 is also coupled to a collection of importers 413 which extract data from various applications. In particular, in one exemplary embodiment, a text importer is used to extract text and other information from word processing or text processing files created by word processing programs such as Microsoft Word, etc. This extracted information is the metadata for a particular file. Other types of importers extract metadata from other types of files, such as image files or music files. In this particular embodiment, a particular importer is selected based upon the type of file which has been created and modified by an application program. For example, if the data file was created by PhotoShop, then an image importer for PhotoShop may be used to input the metadata from a PhotoShop data file into the metadata database 415 through the metadata processing software 401. On the other hand, if the data file is a word processing document, then an importer designed to extract metadata from a word processing document is called upon to extract the metadata from the word processing data file and place it into the metadata database 415 through the metadata processing software 401. Typically, a plurality of different importers may be required in order to handle the plurality of different application programs which are used in a typical computer system. The importers 413 may optionally include a plurality of exporters which are capable of exporting the extracted metadata for particular types of data files back to property sheets or other data components maintained by certain application programs. For example, certain application programs may maintain some metadata for each data file created by the program, but this metadata is only a subset of the metadata extracted by an importer from this type of data file. In this instance, the exporter may export back additional metadata or may simply insert metadata into blank fields of metadata maintained by the application program.
  • The software architecture 400 also includes a file system directory 417 for the metadata. This file system directory keeps track of the relationship between the data files and their metadata and keeps track of the location of the metadata object (e.g. a metadata file which corresponds to the data file from which it was extracted) created by each importer. In one exemplary embodiment, the metadata database is maintained as a flat file format as described below, and the file system directory 417 maintains this flat file format. One advantage of a flat file format is that the data is laid out on a storage device as a string of data without references between fields from one metadata file (corresponding to a particular data file) to another metadata file (corresponding to another data file). This arrangement of data will often result in faster retrieval of information from the metadata database 415.
  • The software architecture 400 of FIG. 4 also includes find by content software 419 which is operatively coupled to a database 421 which includes an index of files. The index of files represents at least a subset of the data files in a storage device and may include all of the data files in a particular storage device (or several storage devices), such as the main hard drive of a computer system. The index of files may be a conventional indexed representation of the content of each document. The find by content software 419 searches for words in that content by searching through the database 421 to see if a particular word exists in any of the data files which have been indexed. The find by content software functionality is available through the metadata processing software 401 which provides the advantage to the user that the user can search concurrently both the index of files in the database 421 (for the content within a file) as well as the metadata for the various data files being searched. The software architecture shown in FIG. 4 may be used to perform the method shown in FIG. 5 or alternative architectures may be used to perform the method of FIG. 5.
  • The method of FIG. 5 may begin in operation 501 in which a notification of a change for a file is received. This notification may come from the OS kernel 403 which notifies the metadata processing software 401 that a file has been changed. This notification may come from sniffer software elements which detect new or modified files and deletion of files. This change may be the creation of a new file or the modification of an existing file or the deletion of an existing file. The deletion of an existing file causes a special case of the processing method of FIG. 5 and is not shown in FIG. 5. In the case of a deletion, the metadata processing software 401, through the use of the file system directory 417, deletes the metadata file in the metadata database 415 which corresponds to the deleted file. The other types of operations, such as the creation of a new file or the modification of an existing file, causes the processing to proceed from operation 501 to operation 503 in which the type of file which is the subject of the notification is determined. The file may be an Acrobat PDF file or an RTF word processing file or a JPEG image file, etc. In any case, the type of the file is determined in operation 503. This may be performed by receiving from the OS kernel 403 the type of file along with the notification or the metadata processing software 401 may request an identification of the type of file from the file system graphical user interface software 405 or similar software which maintains information about the data file, such as the creator application or parent application of the data file. It will be understood that in one exemplary embodiment, the file system graphical user interface software 405 is the Finder program which operates on the Macintosh operating system. In alternative embodiments, the file system graphical user interface system may be Windows Explorer which operates on Microsoft's Windows operating system. After the type of file has been determined in operation 503, the appropriate capture software (e.g. one of the importers 413) is activated for the determined file type. The importers may be a plug-in for the particular application which created the type of file about which notification is received in operation 501. Once activated, the importer or capture software imports the appropriate metadata (for the particular file type) into the metadata database, such as metadata database 415 as shown in operation 507. Then in operation 509, the metadata is stored in the database. In one exemplary embodiment, it may be stored in a flat file format. Then in operation 511, the metadata processing software 401 receives search parameter inputs and performs a search of the metadata database (and optionally also causes a search of non-metadata sources such as the index of files 421) and causes the results of the search to be displayed in a user interface. This may be performed by exchanging information between one of the applications, such as the software 405 or the software 407 or the other applications 409 and the metadata processing software 401 through the interface 411. For example, the file system software 405 may present a graphical user interface, allowing a user to input search parameters and allowing the user to cause a search to be performed. This information is conveyed through the interface 411 to the metadata processing software 401 which causes a search through the metadata database 415 and also may cause a search through the database 421 of the indexed files in order to search for content within each data file which has been indexed. The results from these searches are provided by the metadata processing software 401 to the requesting application which, in the example given here, was the software 405, but it will be appreciated that other components of software, such as the email software 407, may be used to receive the search inputs and to provide a display of the search results. Various examples of the user interface for inputting search requests and for displaying search results are described herein and shown in the accompanying drawings.
  • It will be appreciated that the notification, if done through the OS kernel, is a global, system wide notification process such that changes to any file will cause a notification to be sent to the metadata processing software. It will also be appreciated that in alternative embodiments, each application program may itself generate the necessary metadata and provide the metadata directly to a metadata database without the requirement of a notification from an operating system kernel or from the intervention of importers, such as the importers 413. Alternatively, rather than using OS kernel notifications, an embodiment may use software calls from each application to a metadata processing software which receives these calls and then imports the metadata from each file in response to the call.
  • As noted above, the metadata database 415 may be stored in a flat file format in order to improve the speed of retrieval of information in most circumstances. The flat file format may be considered to be a non-B tree, non-hash tree format in which data is not attempted to be organized but is rather stored as a stream of data. Each metadata object or metadata file will itself contain fields, such as the fields shown in the examples of FIGS. 3A and 3B. However, there will typically be no relationship or reference or pointer from one field in one metadata file to the corresponding field (or another field) in the next metadata file or in another metadata file of the same file type. FIG. 6 shows an example of the layout in a flat file format of metadata. The format 601 includes a plurality of metadata files for a corresponding plurality of data files. As shown in FIG. 6, metadata file 603 is metadata from file 1 of application A and may be referred to as metadata file A1. Similarly, metadata file 605 is metadata from file 1 of application B and may be referred to as metadata file B1. Each of these metadata files typically would include fields which are not linked to other fields and which do not contain references or pointers to other fields in other metadata files. It can be seen from FIG. 6 that the metadata database of FIG. 6 includes metadata files from a plurality of different applications (applications A, B, and C) and different files created by each of those applications. Metadata files 607, 609, 611, and 617 are additional metadata files created by applications A, B, and C as shown in FIG. 6.
  • A flexible query language may be used to search the metadata database in the same way that such query languages are used to search other databases. The data within each metadata file may be packed or even compressed if desirable. As noted above, each metadata file, in certain embodiments, will include a persistent identifier which uniquely identifies its corresponding data file. This identifier remains the same even if the name of the file is changed or the file is modified. This allows for the persistent association between the particular data file and its metadata.
  • User Interface Aspects
  • Various different examples of user interfaces for inputting search parameters and for displaying search results are provided herein. It will be understood that some features from certain embodiments may be mixed with other embodiments such that hybrid embodiments may result from these combinations. It will be appreciated that certain features may be removed from each of these embodiments and still provide adequate functionality in many instances.
  • FIG. 7A shows a graphical user interface which is a window which may be displayed on a display device which is coupled to a data processing system such as a computer system. The window 701 includes a side bar having two regions 703A, which is a user-configurable region, and 703B, which is a region which is specified by the data processing system. Further details in connection with these side bar regions may be found in co-pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. ______ filed Jun. 22, 2004, and entitled “Methods and Apparatuses for Operating a Data Processing System,” by inventors Donald Lindsay and Bas Ording, attorney docket number 04860.P3306. The window 701 also includes a display region 705 which in this case displays the results of searches requested by the user. The window 701 also includes a search parameter menu bar 707 which includes configurable pull down menus 713, 715, and 717. The window 701 also includes a text entry region 709 which allows a user to enter text as part of the search query or search parameters. The button 711 may be a start search button which a user activates in order to start a search based upon the selected search parameters. Alternatively, the system may perform a search as soon as it receives any search parameter inputs or search queries from the user rather than waiting for a command to begin the search. The window 701 also includes a title bar 729 which may be used in conjunction with a cursor control device to move, in a conventional manner, the window around a desktop which is displayed on a display device. The window 701 also includes a close button 734, a minimize button 735, and a resize button 736 which may be used to close or minimize or resize, respectively, the window. The window 701 also includes a resizing control 731 which allows a user to modify the size of the window on a display device. The window 701 further includes a back button 732 and a forward button 733 which function in a manner which is similar to the back and forward buttons on a web browser, such as Internet Explorer or Safari. The window 701 also includes view controls which include three buttons for selecting three different types of views of the content within the display region 705. When the contents found in a search exceed the available display area of a display region 705, scroll controls, such as scroll controls 721, 722, and 723, appear within the window 701. These may be used in a conventional manner, for example, by dragging the scroll bar 721 within the scroll region 721A using conventional graphical user interface techniques.
  • The combination of text entry region 709 and the search parameter menu bar allow a user to specify a search query or search parameters. Each of the configurable pull down menus presents a user with a list of options to select from when the user activates the pull down menu. As shown in FIG. 7A, the user has already made a selection from the configurable pull down menu 713 to specify the location of the search, which in this case specifies that the search will occur on the local disks of the computer systems. Configurable pull down menu 715 has also been used by the user to specify the kind of document which is to be searched for, which in this case is an image document as indicated by the configurable pull down menu 715 which indicates “images” as the selected configuration of this menu and hence the search parameter which it specifies. The configurable pull down menu 717, as shown in FIG. 7A, represents an add search parameter pull down menu. This add search parameter pull down menu allows the user to add additional criteria to the search query to further limit the search results. In the embodiment shown in FIG. 7A, each of the search parameters is logically ANDed in a Boolean manner. Thus the current search parameter specified by the user in the state shown in FIG. 7A searches all local disks for all images, and the user is in the middle of the process of selecting another search criteria by having selected the add search criteria pull down menu 717, resulting in the display of the pull down menu 719, which has a plurality of options which may be selected by the user.
  • FIG. 7B shows the window 701 after the user has caused the selection of the time option within pull down menu 719, thereby causing the display of a submenu 719A which includes a list of possible times which the user may select from. Thus it appears that the user wants to limit the search to all images on all local disks within a certain period of time which is to be specified by making a selection within the submenu 719A.
  • FIG. 7C shows the window 701 on the display of a data processing system after the user has selected a particular option (in this case “past week”) from the submenu 719A. If the user accepts this selection, then the display shown in FIG. 7D results in which the configurable pull down menu 718 is displayed showing that the user has selected as part of the search criteria files that have been created or modified in the past week. It can be seen from FIG. 7D that the user can change the particular time selected from this pull down menu 718 by selecting another time period within the pull down menu 718A shown in FIG. 7D. Note that the configurable pull down menu 717, which represents an add search parameter menu, has now moved to the right of the configurable pull down menu 718. The user may add further search parameters by pressing or otherwise activating the configurable pull down menu 717 from the search parameter menu bar 707. If the user decides that the past week is the proper search criteria in the time category, then the user may release the pull down menu 718A from being displayed in a variety of different ways (e.g. the user may release the mouse button which was being depressed to keep the pull down menu 718A on the display). Upon releasing or otherwise dismissing the pull down menu 718A, the resulting window 701 shown in FIG. 7E then appears. There are several aspects of this user interface shown in FIG. 7A-7E which are worthy of being noted. The search parameters or search query is specified within the same window as the display of the search results. This allows the user to look at a single location or window to understand the search parameters and how they affected the displayed search results, and may make it easier for a user to alter or improve the search parameters in order to find one or more files. The configurable pull down menus, such as the add search parameter pull down menu, includes hierarchical pull down menus. An example of this is shown in FIG. 7B in which the selection of the time criteria from the pull down menu 717 results in the display of another menu, in this case a submenu 719A which may be selected from by the user. This allows for a compact presentation of the various search parameters while keeping the initial complexity (e.g. without submenus being displayed) at a lower level. Another useful aspect of the user interface shown in FIG. 7A-7E is the ability to reconfigure pull down menus which have previously been configured. Thus, for example, the configurable pull down menu 713 currently specifies the location of the search (in this case, all local disks), however, this may be modified by selecting the pull down region associated with the configurable pull down menu 713, causing the display of a menu of options indicating alternative locations which may be selected by the user. This can also be seen in FIG. 7D in which the past week option has been selected by the user (as indicated by “past week” being in the search parameter menu bar 707), but a menu of options shown in the pull down menu 71 8A allows the user to change the selected time from the “past week” to some other time criteria. Another useful aspect of this user interface is the ability to continue adding various search criteria by using the add search criteria pull down menu 717 and selecting a new criteria.
  • It will also be appreciated that the various options in the pull down menus may depend upon the fields within a particular type of metadata file. For example, the selection of “images” to be searched may cause the various fields present in the metadata for an image type file to appear in one or more pull down menus, allowing the user to search within one or more of those fields for that particular type of file. Other fields which do not apply to “images” types of files may not appear in these menus in order reduce the complexity of the menus and to prevent user confusion.
  • Another feature of the present invention is shown in FIGS. 7A-7E. In particular, the side bar region 703A, which is the user-configurable portion of the side bar, includes a representation of a folder 725 which represents the search results obtained from a particular search, which search results may be static or they may be dynamic in that, in certain instances, the search can be performed again to obtain results based on the current files in the system. The folder 725 in the example shown in FIGS. 7A-7E represents a search on a local disk for all images done on December 10th. By selecting this folder in the side bar region 703A, the user may cause the display in the display region 705 of the results of that search. In this way, a user may retrieve a search result automatically by saving the search result into the side bar region 703A. One mechanism for causing a search result or a search query to be saved into the side bar region 703A is to select the add folder button 727 which appears in the bottom portion of the window 701. By selecting this button, the current search result or search query is saved as a list of files and other objects retrieved in the current search result. In the case where the search query is saved for later use rather than the saving of a search result, then the current search query is saved for re-use at a later time in order to find files which match the search query at that later time. The user may select between these two functionalities (saving a search result or saving a search query) by the selection of a command which is not shown.
  • FIGS. 8A and 8B show another aspect of a user interface feature which may be used with certain embodiments of the present invention. The window 801 of FIG. 8A represents a display of the search results which may be obtained as a result of using one of the various different embodiments of the present invention. The search results are separated into categories which are separated by headers 805, 807, 809, and 811 which in this case represent periods of time. This particular segmentation with headers was selected by the user's selecting the heading “date modified” using the date modified button 803 at the top of the window 801. An alternative selection of the kind category by selecting the button 802 at the top of the window 801A shown in FIG. 8B results in a different formatting of the search results which are now categorized by headers which indicate the types of files which were retrieved in the search and are separated by the headings 815, 817, 819, and 821 as shown in FIG. 8B. The use of these headings in the search results display allows the user to quickly scan through the search results in order to find the file.
  • FIG. 9 shows another aspect of the present invention that is illustrated as part of the window 901 shown in FIG. 9. This window includes a display region 905 which shows the results of the search and the window also includes two side bar regions 903A and 903B, where the side bar region 903A is the user-configurable portion and the side bar region 903B is the system controlled portion. A folder add button 927 may be selected by the user to cause the addition of a search result or a search query to be added to the user-configurable portion of the side bar. The window 901 also includes conventional window controls such as a title bar or region 929 which may be used to move the window around a display and view select buttons 937 and maximize, minimize and resize buttons 934, 935, and 936 respectively. The window 901 shows a particular manner in which the results of a text-based search may be displayed. A text entry region 909 is used to enter text for searching. This text may be used to search through the metadata files or the indexed files or a combination of both. The display region 905 shows the results of a search for text and includes at least two columns, 917 and 919, which provide the name of the file that was found and the basis for the match. As shown in column 919, the basis for the match may be the author field or a file name or a key word or comments or other data fields contained in metadata that was searched. The column 921 shows the text that was found which matches the search parameter typed into the text entry field 909. Another column 911 provides additional information with respect to the search results. In particular, this column includes the number of matches for each particular type of category or field as well as the total number of matches indicated in the entry 913. Thus, for example, the total number of matches found for the comments field is only 1, while other fields have a higher number of matches.
  • FIG. 10 shows certain other aspects of some embodiments of the present invention. Window 1001 is another search result window which includes various fields and menus for a user to select various search parameters or form a search query. The window 1001 includes a display region 1005 which may be used to display the results of a search and a user-configurable side bar portion 1003A and a system specified side bar portion 1003B. In addition, the window 1001 includes conventional scrolling controls such as controls 1021 and 1022 and 1021A. The window further includes conventional controls such as a title bar 1029 which may be used to move the window and view control buttons 1037 and maximize, minimize, and resize buttons 1034, 1035, and 1036. A start search button 1015 is near a text entry region 1009. A first search parameter menu bar 1007 is displayed adjacent to a second search parameter bar 1011. The first search parameter search bar 1007 allows a user to specify the location for a particular search while two menu pull down controls in the second search parameter menu bar 1011 allow the user to specify the type of file using the pull down menu 1012 and the time the file was created or last modified using the menu 1013.
  • The window 1001 includes an additional feature which may be very useful while analyzing a search result. A user may select individual files from within the display region 1005 and associate them together as one collection. Each file may be individually marked using a specific command (e.g. pressing the right button on a mouse and selecting a command from a menu which appears on the screen, which command may be “add selection to current group”) or similar such commands. By individually selecting such files or by selecting a group of files at once, the user may associate this group of files into a selected group or a “marked” group and this association may be used to perform a common action on all of the files in the group (e.g. print each file or view each file in a viewer window or move each file to a new or existing folder, etc.). A representation of this marked group appears as a folder in the user-configurable portion 1003A. An example of such a folder is the folder 1020 shown in the user-configurable portion 1003A. By selecting this folder (e.g. by positioning a cursor over the folder 1020 and pressing and releasing a mouse button or by pressing another button) the user, as a result of this selection, will cause the display within the display region 1005 of the files which have been grouped together or marked. Alternatively, a separate window may appear showing only the items which have been marked or grouped. This association or grouping may be merely temporary or it may be made permanent by retaining a list of all the files which have been grouped and by keeping a folder 1020 or other representations of the grouping within the user-configurable side bar, such as the side bar 1003A. Certain embodiments may allow multiple, different groupings to exist at the same time, and each of these groupings or associations may be merely temporary (e.g. they exist only while the search results window is displayed), or they may be made permanent by retaining a list of all the files which have been grouped within each separate group. It will be appreciated that the files within each group may have been created from different applications. As noted above, one of the groupings may be selected and then a user may select a command which performs a common action (e.g. print or view or move or delete) on all of the files within the selected group.
  • FIGS. 11A, 11B, 11C, and 11D show an alternative user interface for allowing a user to input search queries or search parameters. The user interface shown in these figures appears within the window 1101 which includes a user-configurable side bar region 1103A and a system specified side bar region 1103B. The window 1101 also includes traditional window controls such as a window resizing control 1131 which may be dragged in a conventional graphical user interface manner to resize the window, and the window further includes scrolling controls such as controls 1121, 1122, and 1123. The scrolling control 1121 may, for example, be dragged within the scrolling region 1121A or a scroll wheel on a mouse or other input device may be used to cause scrolling within a display region 1105. Further, traditional window controls include the title bar 1129 which may be used to move the window around a desktop which is displayed on a display device of a computer system and the window also includes view buttons 1137 as well as close, minimize, and resize buttons 1134, 1135 and 1136. A back and forward button, such as the back button 1132, are also provided to allow the user to move back and forth in a manner which is similar to the back and forth commands in a web browser. The window 1101 includes a search parameter menu bar 1111 which includes a “search by” pull down menu 1112 and a “sort by” pull down menu 1114. The “search by” pull down menu 1112 allows a user to specify the particular search parameter by selecting from the options which appear in the pull down menu once it is activated as shown in FIG. 11B. In particular, the pull down menu 1113 shows one example of a pull down menu when the “search by” pull down menu 1112 has been activated. The “sort by” pull down menu 1114 allows a user to specify how the search results are displayed within a display region 1105. In the example shown in FIGS. 11A-11D a user has used the “sort by” pull down menu 1114 to select the “date viewed” criteria to sort the search results by. It should also be noted that the user may change the type of view of the search results by selecting one of the three view buttons 1137. For example, a user may select an icon view which is the currently selected button among the view buttons 1137, or the user may select a list view or a column view.
  • FIG. 11B shows the result of the user's activation of a “search by” pull down menu 1112 which causes the display of the menu 1113 which includes a plurality of options from which the user may choose to perform a search by. It will be appreciated that there are a number of different ways for a user to activate the “search by” pull down menu 1112. One way includes the use of a cursor, such as a pointer on a display which is controlled by a cursor control device, such as a mouse. The cursor is positioned over the region associated with the “search by” menu title (which is the portion within the search parameter menu bar 1111 which contains the words “search by”) and then the user indicates the selection of the menu title by pressing a button, such as a mouse's button, to cause the pull down menu to appear, which in this case is the menu 1113 shown in FIG. 11B. At this point, the user may continue to move the cursor to point to a particular option within the menu, such as the “time” option. This may result in the display of a submenu to the left or to the right of the menu 1113. This submenu may be similar to the submenu 719A or to the menu 1214 shown in FIG. 12A. If the “kind” option is selected in the menu 1113, the submenu may include a generic list of the different kinds of documents, such as images, photos, movies, text, music, PDF documents, email documents, etc. or the list may include references to specific program names such as PhotoShop, Director, Excel, Word, etc. or it may include a combination of generic names and specific names. FIG. 11C shows the result of the user having selected PhotoShop type of documents from a submenu of the “kind” option shown in menu 1113. This results in the display of the search parameter menu bar 1111A shown in FIG. 11C which includes a highlighted selection 1111B which indicates that the PhotoShop type of documents will be searched for. The search parameter menu bar 1111 appears below the search parameter menu bar 1111A as shown in FIG. 11C. The user may then specify additional search parameters by again using the “search by” pull down menu 112 or by typing text into the text entry field 1109. For example, from the state of the window 1101 shown in FIG. 11C, the user may select the “search by” pull down menu 1112 causing the display of a menu containing a plurality of options, such as the options shown within the menu 1113 or alternative options such as those which relate to PhotoShop documents (e.g. the various fields in the metadata for PhotoShop type of documents). A combination of such fields contained within metadata for PhotoShop type documents and other generic fields (e.g. time, file size, and other parameters) may appear in a menu, such as the menu 1113 which is activated by selecting the “search by” pull down menu. The user may then select another criteria such as the time criteria. In this case, the window 1101 displays a new search parameter menu bar 1115 which allows a user to specify a particular time. The user may select one of the times on the menu bar 1115 or may activate a pull down menu by selecting the menu title “time,” which is shown as the menu title 1116. The state of the window 1101 shown in FIG. 11D would then search for all PhotoShop documents created in the last 30 days or 7 days or 2 days or today or at any time, depending on the particular time period selected by the user.
  • FIGS. 12A, 12B, 12C and 12D show another example of a user interface for allowing the creation of search queries for searching metadata and other data and for displaying the results of the search performed using a search query. The different implementation shown in FIGS. 12A-12D shows a user interface presentation in a column mode; this can be seen by noting the selection of the column button, which is the rightmost button in the view buttons 1237 shown in FIG. 12A. The window 1201 has two columns 1211 and the display region 1205, while the window 1251 of FIG. 12C has three columns which are columns 1257, 1259, and the display region 1255, and the window 1271 has three columns which are columns 1277, 1279, and the display region 1275.
  • The window 1201 shown in FIGS. 12A and 12B includes a display region 1205 which shows the results of a search; these results may be shown dynamically as the user enters search parameters or the results may be shown only after the user has instructed the system to perform the search (e.g. by selecting a “perform search” command). The window 1201 includes conventional window controls, such as a resizing control 1231, a scrolling control 1221, a title bar 1229 which may be used to move the window, a window close button, a window minimize button, and a window resize button 1234, 1235, and 1236, respectively. The window 1201 also includes a user-configurable side bar region 1203A and a system specified side bar region 1203B. It can be seen from FIG. 12A that a browse mode has been selected as indicated by the highlighted “browse” icon 1203C in the system specified side bar region 1203B. The window 1201 also includes a text entry region 1209, which a user may use to enter text for a search, and the window 1201 also includes view selector buttons 1237.
  • A column 1211 of window 1201 allows a user to select various search parameters by selecting one of the options which in turn causes the display of a submenu that corresponds to the selected option. In the case of FIG. 12A, the user has selected the “kind” option 1212 and then has used the submenu 1214 to select the “photos” option from the submenu, resulting in an indicator 1213 (photos) to appear in the column 1211 under the “kind” option as shown in FIG. 12A. It can also be seen that the user has previously selected the “time” option in the column 1211 and has selected from a submenu brought up when the “time” option was selected the “past week” search parameter. When the user has finished making selections of the various options and suboptions from both the column 1112 and any of the corresponding submenus which appear, then the display showed in FIG. 12B appears. Note that the submenus are no longer present and that the user has completed the selection of the various options and suboptions which specify the search parameters. Column 1211 in FIG. 12B provides feedback to the user indicating the exact nature of the search query (in this case a search for all photos dated in the past week), and the results which match the search query are shown in the display region 1205.
  • FIGS. 12C and 12D show an alternative embodiment in which the submenus which appear on a temporary basis in the embodiment of FIGS. 12A and 12B are replaced by an additional column which does not disappear after a selection is made. In particular, the column 1259 of the window 1251 functions in the same manner as the submenu 1214 except that it remains within the window 1251 after a selection is made (wherein the submenu 1214 is removed from the window after the user makes the selection from the submenu). The column 1279 of window 1271 of FIG. 12D is similar to the column 1259. The window 1251 includes a side bar which has a user-configurable side bar region 1253A and a system defined side bar region 1253B. The system specified side bar region 1253B includes a “browse” selection region 1254 which has a clear button 1258 which the user may select to clear the current search query. The window 1271 of FIG. 12D provides an alternative interface for clearing the search query. The window 1271 also includes a user configurable side bar region 1273A and a system specified side bar region 1273B, but the clear button, rather than being with the “search” region 1274 is at the top of the column 1277. The user may clear the current search parameter by selecting the button 1283 as shown in FIG. 12D.
  • FIG. 13A shows another embodiment of a window 1301 which displays search results within a display region 1302. The window 1301 may be a closeable, minimizeable, resizeable, and moveable window having a resizing control 1310, a title bar 1305 which may be used to move the window, a text entry region 1306 and a user configurable portion 1303, and a system specified portion 1304. The window 1301 further includes buttons for selecting various views, including an icon view, a list view, and a column view. Currently, the list view button 1316 has been selected, causing the display of the search results in a list view manner within the display region 1302. It can be seen that the text (“button”) has been entered into the text entry region 1306 and this has caused the system to respond with the search results shown in the display region 1302. The user has specified a search in every location by selecting “everywhere” button 1317. Further, the user has searched for any kind of document by selecting the “kind” option from the pull down menu 1315 and by selecting the “any” option in the pull down menu 1319. The where or location slice 1307 includes a “+” button which may be used to add further search parameters, and similarly, the slice 1308 includes a “+” and a “−” button for adding or deleting search parameters, respectively. The slice 1307 further includes a “save” button 1309 which causes the current search query to be saved in the form of a folder which is added to the user configurable portion 1303 for use later. This is described further below and may be referred to as a “smart folder.” The search input user interface shown in FIGS. 13A and 13B is available within, in certain embodiments, each and every window controlled by a graphical user interface file management system, such as a Finder program which runs on the Macintosh or Windows Explorer which runs on Microsoft Windows. This interface includes the text entry region 1306 as well as the slices 1307 and 1308.
  • The window 1301 shown in FIG. 13B shows the activation of a menu by selecting the search button 1323A, causing a display of a menu having two entries 1323 and 1325. Entry 1323 displays recently performed searches so that a user may merely recall a prior search by selecting the prior search and cause the prior search to be run again. The menu selection 1325 allows the user to clear the list of recent searches in the menu.
  • FIGS. 14A, 14B, and 14C show examples of another window in a graphical user interface file system, such as the Finder which runs on the Macintosh operating system. These windows show the results of a particular search and also the ability to save and use a smart folder which saves a prior search. The window 1401 shown in FIG. 14A includes a display region 1403, a user configurable region 1405, a smart folder 1406, a system specified region 1407, an icon view button 1409, a list view button 1410, and a column view button 1411. The window 1401 also includes a text entry region 1415 and a location slice 1416 which may be used to specify the location for the search, which slice also includes a save button 1417. Additional slices below the slice 1416 allow the user to specify further details with respect to the search, in this case specifying types of documents which are images which were last viewed this week. The user has set the search parameters in this manner by selecting the “kind” option from the pull down menu 1419 and by selecting the “images” type from the pull down menu 1420 and by selecting the “last viewed” option from pull down menu 1418 and by selecting “this week” from the pull down menu 1422. The user has also selected “everywhere” by selecting the button 1421 so that the search will be performed on all disks and storage devices connected to this system. The results are shown within the display region 1403. The user can then save the search query by selecting the “save” button 1417 and may name the saved search query as “this week's images” to produce the smart folder 1406 as shown in the user configurable portion 1405. This allows the user to repeat this search at a later time by merely selecting the smart folder 1406 which causes the system to perform a new search again, and all data which matches the search criteria will be displayed within the display region 1403. Thus, after several weeks, a repeating of this search by selecting the smart folder 1406 will produce an entirely different list if none of the files displayed in the display region 1403 of FIG. 14A are viewed in the last week from the time in which the next search is performed by selecting the smart folder 1406.
  • FIG. 14B shows a way in which a user may sort or further search within the search results specified by a saved search, such as a smart folder. In the case of FIG. 14B, the user has selected the smart folder 1406 and has then entered text “jpg” 1425 in the text entry region 1415. This has caused the system to filter or further limit the search results obtained from the search query saved as the smart folder 1406. Thus, PhotoShop files and other files such as TIF files and GIF files are excluded from the search results displayed within the display region 1403 of FIG. 14B because the user has excluded those files by adding an additional search criteria specified by the text 1425 in the text entry region 1415. It can be seen that the “jpg” text entry is ANDed logically with the other search parameters to achieve the search results displayed in the display region 1403. It can also be seen that the user has selected the icon view by selecting the icon view button 1409. Thus, it is possible for a user to save a search query and use it later and to further limit the results of the search query by performing a search on the results of the search query to further limit the search results.
  • FIG. 14C shows the window 1401 and shows the search results displayed within the display region 1403, where the results are based upon the saved search specified by the smart folder 1406. The user has caused a pull down menu 1427 to appear by selecting the pull down region 1427A. The pull down region 1427 includes several options which a user may select. These options include hiding the search criteria or saving the search (which is similar to selecting the button 1417) or showing view options or opening the selected file. This allows the user, for example, to hide the search criteria, thereby causing the slice 1416 and the other search parameters to be removed from the window 1401 which is a moveable, resizeable, minimizeable, and closeable window.
  • FIG. 14D shows an example of a user interface which allows the user to specify the appearance of a smart folder, such as the smart folder 1406.
  • FIG. 15A, 15B, 15C, and 15D show an example of a system wide search input user interface and search result user interface. In one particular exemplary embodiment, these user interfaces are available on the entire system for all applications which run on the system and all files and metadata, and even address book entries within an address book program, such as a personal information manager, and calendar entries within a calendar program, and emails within an email program, etc. In one exemplary embodiment, the system begins performing the search and begins displaying the results of the search as the user types text into a text entry field, such as the text entry field 1507. The search results are organized by categories and are displayed as a short list which is intentionally abbreviated in order to present only a selected number of the most relevant (scored) matches or hits to the search query. The user can ask for the display of all the hits by selecting a command, such as the “show all” command 1509. FIG. 15A shows a portion of a display controlled by a data processing system. This portion includes a menu bar 1502 which has at its far end a search menu command 1505. The user can select the search menu command by positioning a cursor, using a mouse, for example, over the search menu command 1505 and by pressing a button or by otherwise activating or selecting a command. This causes a display of a text entry region 1507 into which a user can enter text. In the example shown in FIG. 15A, which is a portion of the display, the user has entered the text “shakeit” causing the display of a search result region immediately below a “show all” command region 1509 which is itself immediately below the text entry region 1507. It can be seen that the hits or matches are grouped into categories (“documents” and “PDF documents”) shown by categories 1511 and 1513 within the search result region 1503. FIG. 15B shows another example of a search. In this case, a large number of hits was obtained (392 hits), only a few of which are shown in the search result region 1503. Again, the hits are organized by categories 1511 and 1513. Each category may be restricted in terms of the number of items displayed within the search result region 1503 in order to permit the display of multiple categories at the same time within the search result region. For example, the number of hits in the documents category may greatly exceed the available display space within the search result region 1503, but the hits for this category are limited to a predetermined or dynamically determinable number of entries within the search result region 1503 for the category 1511. An additional category, “top hit” is selected based on a scoring or relevancy using techniques which are known in the art. The user may select the “show all” command 1509 causing the display of a window, such as window 1601 shown in FIG. 16A. FIG. 15C shows a display of a graphical user interface of one embodiment of the invention which includes the menu bar 1502 and the search menu command 1505 on the menu bar 1502. FIG. 15D shows another example of the search result region 1503 which appeared after a search of the term “safari” was entered into the text entry region 1507. It can be seen from the search result region 1503 of FIG. 15D that the search results are again grouped into categories. Another search result window 1520 is also shown in the user interface of FIG. 15D. It can be seen that application programs are retrieved as part of the search results, and a user may launch any one of these application programs by selecting it from the search result region, thereby causing the program to be launched.
  • FIGS. 16A and 16B show examples of search result windows which may be caused to appear by selecting the “show all” command 1509 in FIGS. 15A or 15B. Alternatively, these windows may appear as a result of the user having selected a “find” command or a some other command indicating that a search is desired. Moreover, the window 1601 shown in FIGS. 16A and 16B may appear in response to either of the selection of a show all command or the selection of a find command. The window 1601 includes a text entry region 1603, a group by menu selection region 1605, a sort by menu selection region 1607, and a where menu selection region 1609. The group by selection region 1605 allows a user to specify the manner in which the items in the search results are grouped according to. In the example shown in FIG. 16A, the user has selected the “kind” option from the group by menu selection region 1605, causing the search results to be grouped or sorted according to the kind or type of document or file. It can be seen that the type of file includes “html” files, image files, PDF files, source code files, and other types of files as shown in FIG. 16A. Each type or kind of document is separated from the other documents by being grouped within a section and separated by headers from the other sections. Thus, headers 1611, 1613, 1615, 1617, 1619, 1621, and 1623 designate each of the groups and separate one group from the other groups. This allows a user to focus on evaluating the search results according to certain types of documents. Within each group, such as the document groups or the folder groups, the user has specified that the items are to be sorted by date, because the user has selected the date option within the sort by menu region 1607. The user has also specified that all storage locations are to be searched by selecting “everywhere” from the where menu selection region 1609. Each item in the search result list includes an information button 1627 which may be selected to produce the display of additional information which may be available from the system. An example of such additional information is shown in FIG. 17 in which a user has selected the information button 1627 for item 1635, resulting in the display of an image 1636 corresponding to the item as well as additional information 1637. Similarly, the user has selected the information button for another item 1630 to produce the display of an image of the item 1631 as well as additional information 1632. The user may remove this additional information from the display by selecting the close button 1628 which causes the display of the information for item 1635 to revert to the appearance for that item shown in FIG. 16A. The user may collapse an entire group to hide the entries or search results from that group by selecting the collapse button 1614 shown in FIG. 16A, thereby causing the disappearance of the entries in this group as shown in FIG. 16B. The user may cause these items to reappear by selecting the expand button 1614A as shown in FIG. 16B to thereby revert to the display of the items as shown in FIG. 16A.
  • The search results user interface shown in FIGS. 16A and 16B presents only a limited number of matches or hits within each category. In the particular example of these figures, only the five top (most relevant or most highly sorted) hits are displayed. This can be seen by noticing the entry at the bottom of each list within a group which specifies how many more hits are within that group; these hits can be examined by selecting this indicator, such as indicator 1612, which causes the display of all of the items in the documents category or kind for the search for “button” which was entered into the text entry region 1603. Further examples of this behavior are described below and are shown in conjunction with FIGS. 18A and 18B. It will be appreciated that window 1601 is a closeable and resizable and moveable window and includes a close button and a resizing control 1625A.
  • FIGS. 18A and 18B illustrate another window 1801 which is very similar to the window 1601. The window 1801 includes a text entry region 1803, a group by menu selection region 1805, a sort by menu selection region 1807, and a where menu selection region 1809, each of which function in a manner which is similar to the regions 1605, 1607, and 1609 respectively of FIG. 16A. Each item in a list view within the window 1801 includes an information button 1827, allowing a user to obtain additional information beyond that listed for each item shown in the window 1801. The window 1801 further includes headers 1811, 1813, 1815, 1817, 1819, 1821, and 1823 which separate each group of items, grouped by the type or kind of document, and sorted within each group by date, from the other groups. A collapse button 1814 is available for each of the headers. The embodiment shown in FIGS. 18A and 18B shows the ability to switch between several modes of viewing the information. For example, the user may display all of the hits within a particular group by selecting the indicator 1812 shown in FIG. 18A which results in the display of all of the images files within the window 1801 within the region 1818A. The window is scrollable, thereby allowing the user to scroll through all the images. The user can revert back to the listing of only five of the most relevant images by selecting the “show top 5” button 1832 shown in FIG. 18B. Further, the user can select between a list view or an icon view for the images portion shown in FIGS. 18A and 18B. The user may select the list view by selecting the list view button 1830 or may select the icon view by selecting the icon view button 1831. The list view for the images group is shown in FIG. 16A and the icon view for the images group is shown in FIGS. 18A and 18B. It can be seen that within a single, moveable, resizable, closeable search result window, that there are two different views (e.g. a list view and an icon view) which are concurrently shown within the window. For example, the PDF documents under the header 1819 are displayed in a list view while the images under the header 1817 are displayed in an icon view in FIGS. 18A and 18B. It can also be seen from FIGS. 18A and 18B that each image is shown with a preview which may be capable of live resizing as described in a patent application entitled “Live Content Resizing” by inventors Steve Jobs, Steve Lemay, Jessica Kahn, Sarah Wilkin, David Hyatt, Jens Alfke, Wayne Loofbourrow, and Bertrand Serlet, filed on the same date as this application, and being assigned to the assignee of the present inventions described herein, and which is hereby incorporated herein by reference.
  • FIG. 19A shows another example of a search result window which is similar to the window 1601. The window 1901 shown in FIG. 19A includes a text entry region 1903 and a group by menu selection region 1905 and a sort by menu selection region 1907 and a where menu selection region 1908. Further, the window includes a close button 1925 and a resizing control 1925A. Text has been entered into the text entry region 1903 to produce the search results shown in the window 1901. The search results again are grouped by a category selected by a user which in this case is the people options 1906. This causes the headers 1911, 1913, 1915, and 1917 to show the separation of the groups according to names of people. Within each group, the user has selected to sort by the date of the particular file or document. The user interface shown in FIG. 19A allows a user to specify an individual's name and to group by people to look for communications between two people, for example. FIG. 19B shows another way in which a user can group a text search (“imran”) in a manner which is different from that shown in FIG. 19A. In the case of FIG. 19B, the user has selected a flat list from the group by menu selection region 1905 and has selected “people” from the sort by menu region 1907. The resulting display in window 1901 A is without headers and thus it appears as a flat list.
  • FIG. 19C shows the user interface of another search result window 1930 which includes a text entry region 1903 and the selection regions 1905, 1907, and 1908 along with a scrolling control 1926. The results shown in the window 1930 have been grouped by date and sorted within each group by date. Thus, the headers 1932, 1934, 1936, 1938, and 1940 specify time periods such as when the document was last modified (e.g. last modified today, or yesterday, or last week). Also shown within the search results window 1930 is the information button 1942 which may be selected to reveal further information, such as an icon 1945 and additional information 1946 as shown for one entry under the today group. This additional information may be removed by selecting the contraction button 1944.
  • FIG. 19D shows a search result window 1950 in which a search for the text string “te” is grouped by date but the search was limited to a “home” folder as specified in the where menu selection region 1908. Time specific headers 1952, 1954, 1956, and 1958 separate items within one group from the other groups as shown in FIG. 19D.
  • FIG. 19E shows an alternative embodiment of a search result window. In this embodiment, the window 1970 includes elements which are similar to window 1901 such as the selection regions 1905, 1907, and a scrolling control 1926 as well as a close button 1925 and a resizing control 1925A. The search result window 1970 further includes a “when” menu selection region 1972 which allows the user to specify a search parameter based on time in addition to the text entered into the text entry region 1903. It can be seen from the example shown in FIG. 19E that the user has decided to group the search results by the category and to sort within each group by date. This results in the headers 1973, 1975, 1977, and 1979 as shown in FIG. 19E.
  • FIG. 20 shows an exemplary method of operating a system wide menu for inputting search queries, such as the system wide menu available by selecting the search menu command 1505 shown in FIG. 15A or 15B, or 15C. In operation 2001, the system displays a system wide menu for inputting search queries. This may be the search menu command 1505. The user, in operation 2003, inputs a search, and as the search query is being inputted, the system begins performing and begins displaying the search results before the user finishes inputting the search query. This gives immediate feedback and input to the user as the user enters this information. The system is, in operation 2005, performing a search through files, metadata for the files, emails within an email program, address book entries within an address book program, calendar entries within a calendar program, etc. The system then, in operation 2007, displays an abbreviated (e.g. incomplete) list of hits if there are more than a certain number of hits. An example of this abbreviated listing is shown in FIG. 15B. The listing may be sorted by relevance and segregated into groups such as categories or types of documents. Then in operation 2009, the system receives a command from the user to display all the hits and in operation 2011 the system displays the search results window, such as the window 1601 shown in FIG. 16A. This window may have the ability to display two different types of views, such as an icon view and a list view within the same closeable, resizable, and moveable window. It will be appreciated that the searching, which is performed as the user is typing and the displaying of results as the user is typing may include the searching through the metadata files created from metadata extracted from files created by many different types of software programs.
  • FIGS. 21, and 22A, 22B, 22C, and 22D will now be referred to while describing another aspect of the inventions. This aspect relates to a method of selecting a group of files, such as a group of individual data files. In an exemplary method of this aspect, a data processing system receives a selection of a plurality of items, such as data files, folders (e.g. graphical user interface representations of subdirectories), application programs or a combination of one or more of these items. This selection may be performed by one of the many conventional ways to select a plurality of items such as (a) positioning a cursor at each item individually (e.g. through the movement of a mouse) and indicating a selection individually by, for example, pressing and releasing a button, such as a mouse's button; (b) pointing a cursor at a first item in a list and indicating a selection of the first item and pointing the cursor at a last item in a list of items and indicating a selection of all items from the first item to the last item in the list; (c) drawing a selection rectangle by a dragging operation of the cursor, etc. Thus operation 2101 shown in FIG. 21 receives one or more inputs indicating a selection of a plurality of items. The system in operation 2103 receives a command requesting both the creation of a new storage facility (e.g. a folder) and an association of the plurality of items with the new storage facility. While the operation 2103 is shown following operation 2101, in certain embodiments operation 2103 may precede operation 2101. The association of operation 2103 may be a copy or a move operation. For example, the user may select multiple items and then command the system to move those items from their existing locations to a new folder which is created in one operation as a result of the move and create new folder command. In response to the command received in operation 2103, the system creates a new storage facility, such as a new folder, with a predetermined directory path name or a user specified path name and the system further associates the selected plurality of items with the new storage facility. This association may be either a move or a copy operation. A copy operation would typically involve making a copy of each selected item and storing the item with a path name that reflects the storage of the item within the new folder having a predetermined directory path name or a user specified directory path name. A move operation, in which the items are moved into the new folder, may merely change the path names associated with each of the selected items (rather than making a copy of the items) which changed path names will reflect the new file system location (e.g. within the subdirectory of the new folder) of the selected items.
  • FIGS. 22A-22D show one example of the method of FIG. 21. A desktop 2201 on a display device is shown containing multiple windows and also an icon 2227 on the desktop. A cursor 2211 is also shown on the desktop. The windows 2203, 2205, and 2207 each contain a plurality of items shown as icons. In particular, window 2203 includes a data file represented by icon 2215 in a folder (e.g. a graphical representation of a subdirectory in a file storage system) represented by icon 2217. The window 2205 includes a program icon 2223 and a document icon 2219 and another document icon 2225 and a folder icon 2221. The window 2207 shows a list view of several files including “File B.” The user may then, using the cursor 2211 or using other conventional user interface techniques, select multiple items. This may be done with one input or more inputs which indicate the selection of multiple items. FIG. 22B shows the result of the user having selected icons 2215, 2217, 2223, 2225, 2227, and “File B” in window 2207. It can be seen that the cursor 2211 is positioned adjacent to the icon 2225 at this point in the operation. Then the user, after having selected a plurality of items, may invoke the command referred to in operation 2103. An example of this is shown in FIG. 22C which represents a portion of the desktop 2101, which portion is designated 2201 A as shown in FIG. 22C. The user has caused a pop up menu 2230 to appear, which pop up menu includes three options 2231, 2232, and 2233. Option 2231 would allow a user to move all the selected items into the trash (e.g. delete them) while options 2232 and 2233 relate to the command referred to in operation 2103 of FIG. 21. In particular, option 2232 is a command which is selectable by the user to create a new folder and, in the same operation, move the items which have been selected into the new folder. Option 2233 is a command which allows the user to, in one operation, create a new folder and copy the selected items into the new folder. In the example shown in FIGS. 22A-22D, the user will select option 2232, thereby causing the system to create a new storage facility, such as a new folder with a predetermined directory name (e.g. “new folder”) or alternatively, a user specified path name. This result is shown in FIG. 22D in which the desktop 2201 now includes a new window labeled “new folder” which represents and shows the contents of this new folder, which is also shown as the folder 2253 which is a graphical user interface representation of this new folder.
  • It will be appreciated that this method may employ various alternatives. For example, a window may appear after the command option 2232 or 2233 has been selected, and this window asks for a name for the new folder. This window may display a default name (e.g. “new folder”) in case the user does not enter a new name. Alternatively, the system may merely give the new folder or new storage facility a default path name. Also, the system may merely create the new folder and move or copy the items into the new folder without showing the new window as shown in FIG. 22D.
  • Modern computer operating systems allow different users of the same computer system. These operating systems also allow for the different users to establish ways to protect the privacy of their files such that a first user cannot view contents or modify contents of a second user's files and vice versa if the first and second user take the appropriate steps to limit access. For example, if the first user limits access to the first user's files such that other users cannot read or write to those files or execute the files, then access will be limited to the first user for the first user's files. So, if the second user limits access to the second user's files by setting permissions or other access control features for those files (or one or more files), then read or read and write access or other permutations of access privileges or permissions to the second user's files may be limited. According to certain aspects of the inventions described herein, methods and systems for protecting metadata for user's files are provided to preserve the privacy of the metadata of the files in addition to the files themselves. A permission information for each file may also be stored within the metadata for each file (or the indexed content of the file) such that when a search is done and search results are displayed, metadata and files may be protected by access permissions set by each user or by the system. For example, if the search produces a match for a file and its corresponding metadata but the user who owns that file has controlled the access to the file such that only that user can view the file, then a search by another user which matches both the file and the metadata will not reveal the file or the metadata when the search is done by the other user. It will be appreciated that, at least in certain embodiments, the permissions for the metadata of a file may be inherited or otherwise obtained from the permissions for the file itself.
  • FIG. 23 shows one exemplary method in which the privacy of files and the metadata for those files may be protected according to certain aspects of the inventions described herein. In operation 2301, the system receives a search query from the first user and performs, in operation 2303, a search for all possible matches or hits without regard to permissions, such as permissions for the first user. Then in operation 2305, the data processing system determines access permissions for each file for that first user. Access permissions may include a read only access permission or a read and write access permission or an execute access permission in the case of an executable file. Other types of permissions and access statuses and various combinations and permutations of these statuses may be employed. Typically, the access permissions are defined on a file by file basis and also apply to the metadata for each corresponding file. Also, the permissions can be defined for a group of files, such as files within a directory. A file for which a permission may be defined may include a user data file, such as a portable document file (PDF) or a word processing file or a spreadsheet file or a drawings file or files which are not executable files, and it may include a directory or a link to a remote file or web site or web page which is stored at a remotely located data processing system. The access permissions which are determined in operation 2305 are used to filter the matches or hits produced in operation 2303. The filtering of the hits or matches results in showing only those files for which the user making the query (in this case the first user) is permitted to view. This user is normally the currently logged in user. This method preserves the privacy of files owned by other users and also the privacy of the metadata about those files by not displaying the content of those other files and by not displaying the metadata for those other files for which the user does not have access to view or read. It will be appreciated that, in certain embodiments, operations 2303 and 2305 may be performed concurrently by structuring a search query which takes into account the access permissions and (through a BOOLEAN AND operator) the search query itself provided by the first user. It will also be appreciated that the filtering may use a permissions cache to filter the files based on access permissions.
  • FIG. 24 shows an alternative method in which the access permissions are determined first in order to select a group of files which are then searched using the search query. In operation 2401, the data processing system receives a search query from the current user, and then determines in operation 2403 the access permissions of the current user for each file which in turn determines a selected group or portion of the files on the data processing system. This selected group or portion of files represents those files for which the current user has at least read access permission. All other files on the system cannot be viewed by the current user. Then operation 2405 is performed in which the search is performed on only those selected files. Those files for which the current user does not have read access are not searched since they were selected out of the group in operation 2403. The results for this search will then displayed in operation 2407. The method of FIG. 24 may be advantageous in certain situations, among other reasons, in which users are required to store their files in only certain directories in a directory structure. Files which are stored outside of those directories are not accessible to users which own those directories. For example, if a first user is required to store files only in the first user's directories, and if files stored in other directories are not accessible to the first user, then the method of FIG. 24 can efficiently determine the group of files to which the first user has access and then perform a search on only those files by searching within only the directories which the first user has access to. The method of FIG. 24 may, as with the method of FIG. 23, protect the privacy of the metadata of a file in addition to the file itself. For example, if a first user enters a search query which matches a file and metadata for the file of a second user who has restricted access to that file such that the file can only be used by and viewed by the second user, the method of FIG. 24 will prevent the first user from seeing those files of the second user and also the metadata about those files.
  • FIG. 25 shows another exemplary method which shows how the files and the metadata of the files of the first user may be protected and kept private relative to a second user, even when the search queries of the second user match information in the metadata from files of the first user. In operation 2501, the data processing system optionally receives a first user's log in information and logs in the first user. A log in process may occur automatically (e.g. a default process was established to assume a certain user always uses the data processing system) or it may occur as a result of an application or operating system program requesting a user to specify at least a user name and optionally a password. Operation 2503 represents a typical use by the first user who may be storing files, such as a new file or modifying an existing file which is stored. In each case a file is stored with define permissions based on the current user and selections of the user. For example, the first user may specify that a certain file is to remain private such that read access or write access is only given to the first user and to no other user. Metadata for the files stored in operation 2503 is also stored in operation 2505. This metadata may be stored by importing or exporting metadata from the files stored in operation 2503 into a metadata database. When the first user is done, the first user typically logs out in operation 2507, thereby allowing the second user to log-in in operation 2509. It will be appreciated that in certain operating systems, it is possible for the two users to be concurrently logged in, although that is not the circumstance of FIG. 25. After the second user has logged in, the second user stores files with the second user's defined permissions. These new files or modified files are stored with permissions that indicate whether other users may have access to these files. In operation 2513, metadata for the files of the second user are also stored in the metadata database. Optionally, each metadata file or entry for a corresponding user file may include the defined permissions for that particular file. In operation 2515, a search query from a second user is received and a data processing system performs in operation 2517, a search using the search query without regard to permissions. In other words, the search is performed without limiting the search based upon access permissions, such as only those files which may be viewed by the second user. In operation 2519, files for which the second user does not have read access are filtered out based on the access permissions for the second user. In other words, files that were found in the search in operation 2517 are filtered out based on the access permissions resulting in only those files which match the search criteria and which the second user does have read access to. Results of this search are displayed in operation 2521. A method of FIG. 25 protects the privacy of both the files and the metadata for the files based on the access permissions of the current user who entered the search query.
  • The method of FIG. 25 may be performed with a metadata base wherein the metadata is obtained from files of different types. In this situation, the type of information in metadata for a first type of file will differ from a type of information in metadata for a second type of file. Optionally, the permission and information for each file may be stored within the corresponding metadata file for that file.
  • In certain embodiments it may desirable to provide the user with the ability to set preferences for these searching functions provided by the various embodiments described herein. FIGS. 26 and 27 provided an example of user interfaces which allow a user to set such preferences. Window 5701 shown in FIG. 26 includes a privacy button 5703 and a results button 5705. These two buttons switch between windows 5701 (which is selected when the privacy button 5703 is activated) and window 5701 a (which is selected and displayed when the results button 5705 has been activated). The window 5701 also includes a list 5705 which displays folders and files which can be added to the list by using the add button 5709 or which can be removed from the list by using the remove button 5711. Adding a folder to the list 5707, in certain embodiments, will prevent files contained within those folders from being indexed and thus they will not appear in the search results. In certain embodiments, the metadata from these files will also not be included in any metadata databases so that searches through metadata will not retrieve these files. A folder may be removed from the list 5707 by selecting the folder and then selecting the remove button 5711. A folder may be added to the list 5707 by activating the add button 5709 which then causes a file open window to be displayed, from which the user can select a folder or file to be added to the list 5707. The window 5701 also includes a check box 5713 which allows the user to activate and specify a particular keyboard shortcut. The particular shortcut which is selected may be selected from the pull down menu 5715. In an alternative embodiment, adding a folder to the list 5707 does not prevent the contents of the folder from being indexed or searched, but the contents are not displayed in the search results. In other words, the contents of folders in the list 5707 are still indexed and still searched, but they are not displayed in the search results (and thus they are hidden); in a further alternative embodiment, they can be caused to be displayed by the entry of a password or code by the user.
  • The window 5701 a in FIG. 27 is displayed in response to activating the results button 5705. This window includes a list 5800, which is a list of the various categories which appear in the search result windows. The check boxes, such as check box 5801, may be checked by a user to indicate that the particular category may appear in search results. If a check box is not selected (e.g. there is no check in the box), then the category will not appear in the search results window (however, for reasons relating to efficiency of indexing, the items within such category will still be indexed, and searched through, even though they do not appear in the search results). The order of the categories may be changed by dragging the categories within the list 5800.
  • A permissions cache may be used, in certain embodiments, to determine permissions information for files as part of the process of generating a response to a user's search query. For example, a permissions cache may be used to filter files, based on the permissions of the files, after having retrieved a set of files which match a search query. The use of a permissions cache will often allow a system to process a search query and validate permissions faster than another system which does not use a permissions cache. When a permissions cache is not used, the search software which manages and searches a metadata database and/or a content index database must request another, separate software component, such as the file system software which manages a file system database (which includes the information about file directory structures and permissions information for files in the file system), for the permissions information for files which match the search query. These requests between software components can increase the time required to process search queries. The permissions cache will also often contain the needed permissions information because a user will often search for the same types of documents. Furthermore, once a permissions cache has been created over a period of time, it will contain the permissions information for many of the files that a user is interested in and this information will remain valid because many users do not intentionally change the permissions of their files.
  • A permissions cache may contain, for each file having had its permissions cached, at least in certain embodiments, a file identifier and conventional permissions information for the associated file. The file identifier may be a persistent, unique file identification number, and the conventional permissions information may include read, write and execute permissions for an owner (or other user) of the file as well as read, write and execute permissions for a group (“group permissions”) and also possibly permissions for other users. Normally, the permissions information is stored on a nonvolatile storage, such as a hard drive or other permanent, mass storage device. The permissions cache may be managed by the search and database software component which maintains and searches the metadata database (e.g. metadata database 415) and/or the index database (e.g. index database 421). The permissions cache may be used to filter or otherwise process search queries or search results. As described further herein, the permissions cache may be deleted in its entirety even if it is only partially invalid or may be deleted, and corrected, only in its portions which are invalid. Notifications from the file system software or operating system kernel may be used to indicate whether portions of the permissions cache are invalid because a permission of a file or directory has changed. These notifications are normally made from the file system software or operating system kernel to the software components which manage and search the metadata database and the index database. These notifications normally identify the file (e.g. by specifying the file's persistent, unique identifier) and indicate that the permissions have changed. These notifications may further include the new permissions information in certain embodiments. These notifications may also be the same notifications which, as described herein, indicate that a file has been modified and hence metadata for that file may need to be re-imported into the metadata database (and/or the content of the file needs to be re-indexed and incorporated into the index database); examples of these notifications are described in connection with FIG. 5.
  • FIG. 28A shows an embodiment in which notifications are used to invalidate an entire permissions cache (even if a permission was changed for only one file). This approach is a conservative approach, but for the many users who rarely, if ever, change a permission of a file, then the permissions cache will rarely, if ever, need to be entirely invalidated. In operation 2801 of FIG. 28A, one or more notifications about any change in permissions for any file (which is intended to be searchable) is received by a component, such as a software component which manages the permissions cache. This software component may be the software component(s) which manage and search the metadata database and the index database. In operation 2803, the entire permissions cache is marked as invalid in response to receiving the one or more notifications, and a new permissions cache is created over time as new searches are performed. Operation 2805 represents this creation of the new permissions cache. The method returns to operation 2801 when any new notifications are received which would require that the entire new permissions cache be invalidated, and the process would repeat.
  • FIG. 28B shows an example of an embodiment which uses a permission cache to validate permissions as part of a search process. In this example, it is assumed that the entire permissions cache is invalidated (e.g. as in the method of FIG. 28A), and it is also assumed that the search criteria is used to perform the search through, for example, a metadata database and/or an index database, without regard to permissions and then the permissions for files found in the search are validated in the rest of the process. It will be understood that the validation of permissions of files and the searching for files matching the search query could be performed concurrently; in other words, as files which match the search query are found, their permissions can be validated while the search, using the search query, continues to look for other files that match the search query. In operation 2851 of FIG. 28B, the search query is received and a search is performed. This search is normally done for all possible results (e.g. files which match the search query) without regard to permissions for the files. Then in operation 2853, the state of the permissions cache is determined. The state depends upon the notifications which indicate whether any permissions have changed; these notifications are shown, for example, in FIG. 28A. The component, such as a software component, which manages the permissions cache receives the notifications and marks the entire permissions cache as invalid upon receiving the notification. If the permissions cache has been marked as invalid, then it is entirely deleted and a new permissions cache is created (and marked as valid) as new searches are performed, such as in operations 2855, 2857, and 2859. In these operations, the permissions for each file found in the current search being processed are determined and added to the new permissions cache and the results of the search are displayed or otherwise presented, showing only those files which the user has permission to view.
  • In operation 2853, the system determines that the permissions cache is valid if no notifications (as in FIG. 28A) have been received since the existing permissions cache was first created. If the existing permissions cache is valid, then processing proceeds to operation 2861 in which it is determined whether the file's permissions information is within the permission cache. If the permissions information for the current file being processed is within the permissions cache, then processing proceeds to operation 2867. If the permissions information is not within the permissions cache, then operations 2863 and 2865 follow operation 2861, and in operations 2863 and 2865 the permissions for the file are determined (e.g. the software component managing the permissions cache sends a request to the file system software which searches its file system database to obtain the permissions information and then passes this information back to the software component) and are added to the permissions cache for this file. In operation 2867, the permissions information for the file are examined, using the permissions cache, and it is determined, in operation 2867, whether the user will be given access to the file (which may be metadata for a file or the file itself or both) based on the permissions information and who the user is. In operation 2869, it is determined whether there are further files, retrieved by the search query, which require validation of permissions; if there are such files, then processing returns to operation 2853 and continues as described above. If there are no further files, then the results of the search, after filtering for permissions, are displayed. It will be appreciated that the results may be displayed as each file has its permissions validated (e.g. after operation 2867) rather than after determining that all searched and found files have had their permissions validated.
  • FIG. 29A shows an embodiment in which notifications are used to invalidate only an invalid portion of the permissions cache rather than the entire permissions cache. This approach may be appropriate where it is anticipated that a user will often change permissions of one or more files. In operation 2901, one or more notifications about any change in permissions for any file (which is intended to be searchable) is received by a component, such as a software component, which manages the permissions cache. This software component may be the software component(s) which manage and search the metadata database and the index database. In operation 2903, those portions of the permissions cache which are identified in the notifications from operation 2901 are marked as invalid. Typically, if there is an entry in the permissions cache for the file identified in the notification, then the entry is marked as invalid. In operation 2905, the permissions information, for a file marked as invalid in the permissions cache, is updated when processing search results which include the file in the results; this is described further below. In certain alternative embodiments, the permissions information for the file marked as invalid may be updated at the time of the notification rather than when, at a later time, a future search result includes the file. For example, the permissions information in the permission cache for the file may be updated upon receiving the notification if the notification includes the necessary changes or the entire permissions information for the file.
  • FIG. 29B shows an example of another embodiment which uses a permission cache to validate permissions as part of a search process. In this example, it is assumed that only an invalid portion of a permissions cache is invalidated upon receiving a notification, such as in the example shown in FIG. 29A. It will be understood that the validation of permissions of files and the searching for files matching the search query could be performed concurrently; in other words, as files, which match the search query, are found, their permissions can be validated while the search, using the search query, continues to look for other files that match the search query. In operation 2951, the search query is received and a search is performed. This search is normally done for all possible results (e.g. files which match the search query) without regard to permissions for the files. In operation 2953, it is determined whether, for the current file being processed, its permissions information is stored within the permissions cache. If it is so stored, then processing proceeds to operation 2955, in which it is determined whether the permissions information, in the permissions cache, for the file is valid. If it is valid, then processing proceeds to operation 2961. If in operation 2953, it is determined that there is no permissions information for the file then processing proceeds to operation 2957. If operation 2955 determines that the permissions information, in the permissions cache, is invalid, then processing proceeds to operation 2957. In operation 2957, the permissions information for the file are determined (e.g. the software component managing the permissions cache sends a request to the file system software which searches its file system database to obtain the permissions information and then passes this information back to the software component) and are added to the entry for the file in the permissions cache in operation 2959. Operation 2961 follows either operations 2959 or 2955, and it examines the permissions information, using the permissions cache, and determines, for the current user, whether the user will be given access to the file (which may be metadata for a file or the file itself or both) based on the permissions information and who the user is. In operation 2963, it is determined whether there are further files, retrieved by the search query, which require validation of permissions; if there are such files, then processing returns to operation 2953 and continues as described above. If there are no further files, then the results of the search, after filtering for permissions, are displayed. It will be appreciated that the results may be displayed as each file has its permissions validated (e.g. after operation 2961) rather than after determining that all searched and found files have had their permissions validated.
  • In certain alternative embodiments, the software managing permissions filtering for the search engine(s) may create multiple permissions caches, such as one permissions cache for each user account. These caches are processed in a similar manner described herein and are used for their corresponding user.
  • In the foregoing specification, the invention has been described with reference to specific exemplary embodiments thereof. It will be evident that various modifications may be made thereto without departing from the broader spirit and scope of the invention as set forth in the following claims. The specification and drawings are, accordingly, to be regarded in an illustrative sense rather than a restrictive sense.

Claims (90)

1. A machine implemented method of processing data, the method comprising:
receiving a search query from a first user;
performing a search, based on the search query, of at least metadata of a first plurality of files;
determining a set of permissions of the first user, the set of permissions defining, at least a right to view information;
displaying results of the search based upon the set of permissions, wherein the type of information in metadata for files of a first type differs from the type of information in metadata for files of a second type.
2. A method as in claim 1 wherein the set of permissions prevents the display of information about a first set of files and metadata for the first set of files for which the first user does not have access to view and wherein the search is performed without regard to the set of permissions.
3. A method as in claim 1 wherein the set of permissions includes permissions relating to at least one of (a) read only access; (b) read and write access and (c) execute access, and wherein the set of permissions for files created by the first user can be changed by the first user.
4. A method as in claim 1 wherein the set of permissions is determined before the search is performed and wherein the search limits results to files and metadata which satisfy the set of permissions.
5. A method as in claim 1 wherein the first user is identified by a name and wherein at least one other user comprises one of a super user of an administrator and wherein the determining comprises examining data in a permissions cache.
6. A method as in claim 1 wherein, for at least some of the files in the first plurality of files, the first user can establish access permissions for an owner of each file and for a group of users.
7. A machine readable medium providing instructions which when executed by a data processing system cause the data processing system to perform a method of processing data, the method comprising:
receiving a search query from a first user;
performing a search, based on the search query, of at least metadata of a first plurality of files;
determining a set of permissions of the first user, the set of permissions defining, at least a right to view information;
displaying results of the search based upon the set of permissions, wherein the type of information in metadata for files of a first type differs from the type of information in metadata for files of a second type.
8. A medium as in claim 7 wherein the set of permissions prevents the display of information about a first set of files and metadata for the first set of files for which the first user does not have access to view and wherein the search is performed without regard to the set of permissions.
9. A medium as in claim 7 wherein the set of permissions includes permissions relating to at least one of a (a) read only access; (b) read and write access and (c) execute access, and wherein the set of permissions for files created by the first user can be changed by the first user.
10. A medium as in claim 7 wherein the set of permissions is determined before the search is performed and wherein the search limits results to files and metadata which satisfy the set of permissions.
11. A medium as in claim 7 wherein the first user is identified by a name and wherein at least one other user comprises one of a super user or an administrator and wherein the determining comprises examining data in a permissions cache.
12. A medium as in claim 7 wherein, for at least some of the files in the first plurality of files, the first user can establish access permissions for an owner each file and for a group of users.
13. A data processing system comprising:
means for receiving a search query from a first user;
means for performing a search, based on the search, of at least metadata of a first plurality of files;
means for determining a set of permissions of the first user, the set of permissions defining, at least a right to view information;
means for displaying results of the search based upon the set of permissions, wherein the type of information in metadata for files of a first type differs from the type of information in metadata for files of a second type.
14. A system as in claim 13 wherein the set of permissions prevents the display of information about a first set of files and metadata for the first set of files for which the first user does not have access to view and wherein the search is performed without regard to the set of permissions.
15. A system as in claim 13 wherein the set of permissions includes permissions relating to at least one of (a) read only access; (b) read and write access and (c) execute access, and wherein the set of permissions for files created by the first user can be changed by the first user.
16. A system as in claim 13 wherein the set of permissions is determined before the search is performed and wherein the search limits results to files and metadata which satisfy the set of permissions.
17. A system as in claim 13 wherein the first user is identified by a name and wherein at least one other user comprises one of a super user or an administrator and wherein the determining comprises examining data in a permissions cache.
18. A system as in claim 13 wherein, for at least some of the files in the first plurality of files, the first user can establish access permissions for an owner of each file and for a group of users.
19. A machine implemented method of processing data, the method comprising:
receiving a search query from a first user having a set of permissions defined relative to at least a set of files within a first plurality of files accessible on a data processing system;
performing a search using the search query wherein the search is not limited by the set of permissions of the first user, the search producing a first set of files as matching the search query;
filtering, after the search, the first set of files with the set of permissions to produce a second set of files for which the first user has permission to access;
displaying information of the second set of files.
20. A method as in claim 19 wherein the set of permissions prevents the display of information about files in the first set of files which are not in the second set of files and wherein the filtering comprises examining data in a permissions cache.
21. A method as in claim 19 wherein the first user is identified by a name and wherein at least one other user comprises one of a super user or an administrator.
22. A method as in claim 19 wherein set of permissions includes permissions relating to at least one of (a) read only access; (b) read and write access; and (c) execute access and wherein the set of permissions for files created by the first user can be changed by the first user.
23. A method as in claim 19 wherein the first user is identified as the first user through a name and password.
24. A machine readable medium providing instructions which when executed by a data processing system cause the data processing system to perform a method of processing data, the method comprising:
receiving a search query from a first user having a set of permissions defined relative to at least a set of files within a first plurality of files accessible on a data processing system;
performing a search using the search query wherein the search is not limited by the set of permissions of the first user, the search producing a first set of files as matching the search query;
filtering, after the search, the first set of files with the set of permissions to produce a second set of files for which the first the first user has permission to access;
displaying information of the second set of files.
25. A medium as in claim 24 wherein the set of permissions prevents the display of information about files in the first set of files which are not in the second set of files and wherein the filtering comprises examining data in a permissions cache.
26. A medium as in claim 24 wherein the first user is identified by a name and wherein at least one other user comprises one of a super user or an administrator.
27. A medium as in claim 24 wherein set of permissions includes permissions relating to at least one of (a) read only access; (b) read and write access; and (c) execute access and wherein the set of permissions for files created by the first user can be changed by the first user.
28. A medium as in claim 24 wherein the first user is identified as the first user through a name and password.
29. A data processing system comprising:
means for receiving a search query from a first user having a set of permissions defined relative to at least a set of files within a first plurality of files accessible on a data processing system;
means for performing a search using the search query wherein the search is not limited by the set of permissions of the first user, the search producing a first set of files as matching the search query;
means for filtering, after the search, the first set of files with the set of permissions to produce a second set of files for which the first user has permission to access;
means for displaying information of the second set of files.
30. A system as in claim 29 wherein the set of permissions prevents the display of information about files in the first set of files which are not in the second set of files and wherein the filtering comprises examining data in a permissions cache.
31. A system as in claim 29 wherein the first user is identified by a name and wherein at least one other user comprises one of a super user or an administrator.
32. A system as in claim 29 wherein set of permissions includes permissions relating to at least one of (a) read only access; (b) read and write access; and (c) execute access and wherein the set of permissions for files created by the first user can be changed by the first user.
33. A system as in claim 29 wherein the first user is identified as the first user through a name and password.
34. A machine implemented method of processing data, the method comprising:
receiving a notification concerning at least one change of permissions information for at least one file;
updating a permissions cache in response to the notification, wherein the permissions cache is used to determine search results in response to a search query.
35. A method as in claim 34 wherein the updating comprises deleting, or marking for deletion, the permissions cache if any file has had its permissions changed.
36. A method as in claim 34 wherein the updating comprises replacing a portion of the permissions cache containing permissions information for files having had their permissions changed.
37. A method as in claim 35 wherein said deleting occurs even if said any files have not had any permissions information stored in the permissions cache.
38. A method as in claim 34 further comprising:
performing a search and finding a first file having not been cached in the permissions cache and updating the permissions cache to include permissions information for the first file; and wherein the notification is from a kernel of an operating system and is received by a database software component which updates the permissions cache.
39. A machine readable medium providing executable instructions which when executed by a system cause the system to perform a method of processing data, the method comprising:
receiving a notification concerning at least one change of permissions information for at least one file;
updating a permissions cache in response to the notification, wherein the permissions cache is used to determine search results in response to a search query.
40. A medium as in claim 39 wherein the updating comprises deleting, or marking for deletion, the permissions cache if any file has had its permissions changed.
41. A medium as in claim 39 wherein the updating comprises replacing a portion of the permissions cache containing permissions information for files having had their permissions changed.
42. A medium as in claim 40 wherein said deleting occurs even if said any files have not had any permissions information stored in the permissions cache.
43. A medium as in claim 39 further comprising:
performing a search and finding a first file having not been cached in the permissions cache and updating the permissions cache to include permissions information for the first file; and wherein the notification is from a kernel of an operating system and is received by a database software component which updates the permissions cache.
44. A system comprising:
means for receiving a notification concerning at least one change of permissions information for at least one file;
means for updating a permissions cache in response to the notification, wherein the permissions cache is used to determine search results in response to a search query.
45. A system as in claim 44 wherein the means for updating comprises means for deleting, or marking for deletion, the permissions cache if any file has had its permissions changed.
46. A system as in claim 44 wherein the means for updating comprises means for replacing a portion of the permissions cache containing permissions information for files having had their permissions changed.
47. A system as in claim 45 wherein said deleting occurs even if said any files have not had any permissions information stored in the permissions cache.
48. A system as in claim 44 further comprising:
means for performing a search and finding a first file having not been cached in the permissions cache and updating the permissions cache to include permissions information for the first file; and wherein the notification is from a kernel of an operating system and is received by a database software component which updates the permissions cache.
49. A machine implemented method of processing data, the method comprising:
determining whether a first file, which matches a search query, has permissions information stored in a permissions cache;
storing permissions information, for the first file, in the permissions cache in response to determining that the permissions information for the first file has not been stored in the permissions.
50. A method as in claim 49 further comprising:
determining a state of the permissions cache, wherein the state indicates whether the permissions cache includes valid permissions information.
51. A method as in claim 49 further comprising:
performing a search in response to the search query;
displaying results of the search; and wherein permissions information for a file having permissions information stored in the permissions cache is determined from the permissions cache without requesting a file system software component for the permissions information of the file.
52. A machine readable medium providing executable program instructions which when executed cause a system to perform a method of processing data, the method comprising:
determining whether a first file, which matches a search query, has permissions information stored in a permissions cache;
storing permissions information, for the first file, in the permissions cache in response to determining that the permissions information for the first file has not been stored in the permissions.
53. A medium as in claim 52, the method further comprising:
determining a state of the permissions cache, wherein the state indicates whether the permissions cache includes valid permissions information.
54. A medium as in claim 52, the method further comprising:
performing a search in response to the search query;
displaying results of the search; and wherein permissions information for a file having permissions information stored in the permissions cache is determined from the permissions cache without requesting a file system software component for the permissions information of the file.
55. A system comprising:
means for determining whether a first file, which matches a search query, has permissions information stored in a permissions cache;
means for storing permissions information, for the first file, in the permissions cache in response to determining that the permissions information for the first file has not been stored in the permissions.
56. A system as in claim 55 further comprising:
means for determining a state of the permissions cache, wherein the state indicates whether the permissions cache includes valid permissions information.
57. A system as in claim 55 further comprising:
means for performing a search in response to the search query;
means for displaying results of the search; and wherein permissions information for a file having permissions information stored in the permissions cache is determined from the permissions cache without requesting a file system software component for the permissions information of the file.
58. A machine implemented method of processing data, the method comprising:
performing a search, based on a search query, of at least metadata of a first plurality of files;
determining a set of permissions of a first user, the set of permissions defining, at least a right to view information, wherein the type of information in metadata for files of a first type differs from the type of information in metadata for files of a second type.
59. A method as in claim 58 wherein the set of permissions prevents the display of information about a first set of files and metadata for the first set of files for which the first user does not have access to view and wherein the search is performed without regard to the set of permissions.
60. A method as in claim 58 wherein the set of permissions includes permissions relating to at least one of (a) read only access; (b) read and write access and (c) execute access, and wherein the set of permissions for files created by the first user can be changed by the first user.
61. A method as in claim 58 wherein the set of permissions is determined before the search is performed and wherein the search limits results to files and metadata which satisfy the set of permissions.
62. A method as in claim 58 wherein the first user is identified by a name and wherein at least one other user comprises one of a super user of an administrator and wherein the determining comprises examining data in a permissions cache.
63. A method as in claim 58 wherein, for at least some of the files in the first plurality of files, the first user can establish access permissions for an owner of each file and for a group of users.
64. A machine readable medium providing instructions which when executed by a data processing system cause the data processing system to perform a method of processing data, the method comprising:
performing a search, based on the search query, of at least metadata of a first plurality of files;
determining a set of permissions of a first user, the set of permissions defining, at least a right to view information, wherein the type of information in metadata for files of a first type differs from the type of information in metadata for files of a second type.
65. A medium as in claim 64 wherein the set of permissions prevents the display of information about a first set of files and metadata for the first set of files for which the first user does not have access to view and wherein the search is performed without regard to the set of permissions.
66. A medium as in claim 64 wherein the set of permissions includes permissions relating to at least one of a (a) read only access; (b) read and write access and (c) execute access, and wherein the set of permissions for files created by the first user can be changed by the first user.
67. A medium as in claim 64 wherein the set of permissions is determined before the search is performed and wherein the search limits results to files and metadata which satisfy the set of permissions.
68. A medium as in claim 64 wherein the first user is identified by a name and wherein at least one other user comprises one of a super user or an administrator and wherein the determining comprises examining data in a permissions cache.
69. A medium as in claim 64 wherein, for at least some of the files in the first plurality of files, the first user can establish access permissions for an owner each file and for a group of users.
70. A data processing system comprising:
means for performing a search, based on a search, of at least metadata of a first plurality of files;
means for determining a set of permissions of a first user, the set of permissions defining, at least a right to view information, wherein the type of information in metadata for files of a first type differs from the type of information in metadata for files of a second type.
71. A system as in claim 70 wherein the set of permissions prevents the display of information about a first set of files and metadata for the first set of files for which the first user does not have access to view and wherein the search is performed without regard to the set of permissions.
72. A system as in claim 70 wherein the set of permissions includes permissions relating to at least one of (a) read only access; (b) read and write access and (c) execute access, and wherein the set of permissions for files created by the first user can be changed by the first user.
73. A system as in claim 70 wherein the set of permissions is determined before the search is performed and wherein the search limits results to files and metadata which satisfy the set of permissions.
74. A system as in claim 70 wherein the first user is identified by a name and wherein at least one other user comprises one of a super user or an administrator and wherein the determining comprises examining data in a permissions cache.
75. A system as in claim 70 wherein, for at least some of the files in the first plurality of files, the first user can establish access permissions for an owner of each file and for a group of users.
76. A machine implemented method of processing data, the method comprising:
performing a search using a search query wherein the search is not limited by a set of permissions of a first user, the search producing a first set of files as matching the search query;
filtering, after the search, the first set of files with the set of permissions to produce a second set of files for which the first user has permission to access.
77. A method as in claim 76 wherein the set of permissions prevents the display of information about files in the first set of files which are not in the second set of files and wherein the filtering comprises examining data in a permissions cache.
78. A method as in claim 76 wherein the first user is identified by a name and wherein at least one other user comprises one of a super user or an administrator.
79. A method as in claim 76 wherein set of permissions includes permissions relating to at least one of (a) read only access; (b) read and write access; and (c) execute access and wherein the set of permissions for files created by the first user can be changed by the first user.
80. A method as in claim 76 wherein the first user is identified as the first user through a name and password.
81. A machine readable medium providing instructions which when executed by a data processing system cause the data processing system to perform a method of processing data, the method comprising:
performing a search using a search query wherein the search is not limited by a set of permissions of a first user, the search producing a first set of files as matching the search query;
filtering, after the search, the first set of files with the set of permissions to produce a second set of files for which the first the first user has permission to access.
82. A medium as in claim 81 wherein the set of permissions prevents the display of information about files in the first set of files which are not in the second set of files and wherein the filtering comprises examining data in a permissions cache.
83. A medium as in claim 81 wherein the first user is identified by a name and wherein at least one other user comprises one of a super user or an administrator.
84. A medium as in claim 81 wherein set of permissions includes permissions relating to at least one of (a) read only access; (b) read and write access; and (c) execute access and wherein the set of permissions for files created by the first user can be changed by the first user.
85. A medium as in claim 81 wherein the first user is identified as the first user through a name and password.
86. A data processing system comprising:
means for performing a search using a search query wherein the search is not limited by a set of permissions of a first user, the search producing a first set of files as matching the search query;
means for filtering, after the search, the first set of files with the set of permissions to produce a second set of files for which the first user has permission to access.
87. A system as in claim 86 wherein the set of permissions prevents the display of information about files in the first set of files which are not in the second set of files and wherein the filtering comprises examining data in a permissions cache.
88. A system as in claim 86 wherein the first user is identified by a name and wherein at least one other user comprises one of a super user or an administrator.
89. A system as in claim 86 wherein set of permissions includes permissions relating to at least one of (a) read only access; (b) read and write access; and (c) execute access and wherein the set of permissions for files created by the first user can be changed by the first user.
90. A system as in claim 86 wherein the first user is identified as the first user through a name and password.
US11/112,421 2004-06-25 2005-04-22 Methods and systems for managing data Abandoned US20050289127A1 (en)

Priority Applications (3)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US11/112,421 US20050289127A1 (en) 2004-06-25 2005-04-22 Methods and systems for managing data
US11/499,485 US9081872B2 (en) 2004-06-25 2006-08-04 Methods and systems for managing permissions data and/or indexes
US11/646,871 US8190638B2 (en) 2004-06-25 2006-12-27 Methods and systems for managing data

Applications Claiming Priority (3)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US10/877,584 US7730012B2 (en) 2004-06-25 2004-06-25 Methods and systems for managing data
US64308705P 2005-01-07 2005-01-07
US11/112,421 US20050289127A1 (en) 2004-06-25 2005-04-22 Methods and systems for managing data

Related Parent Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US10/877,584 Continuation-In-Part US7730012B2 (en) 2004-06-25 2004-06-25 Methods and systems for managing data

Related Child Applications (3)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US10/877,584 Continuation-In-Part US7730012B2 (en) 2004-06-25 2004-06-25 Methods and systems for managing data
US11/499,485 Continuation-In-Part US9081872B2 (en) 2004-06-25 2006-08-04 Methods and systems for managing permissions data and/or indexes
US11/646,871 Continuation US8190638B2 (en) 2004-06-25 2006-12-27 Methods and systems for managing data

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US20050289127A1 true US20050289127A1 (en) 2005-12-29

Family

ID=37718767

Family Applications (2)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US11/112,421 Abandoned US20050289127A1 (en) 2004-06-25 2005-04-22 Methods and systems for managing data
US11/646,871 Active 2025-04-06 US8190638B2 (en) 2004-06-25 2006-12-27 Methods and systems for managing data

Family Applications After (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US11/646,871 Active 2025-04-06 US8190638B2 (en) 2004-06-25 2006-12-27 Methods and systems for managing data

Country Status (1)

Country Link
US (2) US20050289127A1 (en)

Cited By (31)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20070056045A1 (en) * 2005-09-02 2007-03-08 Microsoft Corporation Controlled access to objects or areas in an electronic document
US20070162450A1 (en) * 2005-04-04 2007-07-12 Anthony Siress Query object permissions establishment system and methods
US20070208996A1 (en) * 2006-03-06 2007-09-06 Kathrin Berkner Automated document layout design
US20070294204A1 (en) * 2006-06-14 2007-12-20 Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba System and method for accessing content from selected sources via a document processing device
US20080033916A1 (en) * 2006-08-04 2008-02-07 Elton Ray Document catalog system
US20080037873A1 (en) * 2003-01-29 2008-02-14 Kathrin Berkner Reformatting documents using document analysis information
US20080172377A1 (en) * 2007-01-16 2008-07-17 Microsoft Corporation Efficient paging of search query results
US20080235262A1 (en) * 2007-03-21 2008-09-25 Holm Aaron H Digital file management system with file mapping for high resolution and other images
US20080306954A1 (en) * 2007-06-07 2008-12-11 Hornqvist John M Methods and systems for managing permissions data
US20090119266A1 (en) * 2005-04-04 2009-05-07 Younite, Inc. Distributed management framework for personal attributes
US20100114950A1 (en) * 1999-08-16 2010-05-06 Arvind Raichur Dynamic Index and Search Engine Server
US20100153364A1 (en) * 2008-12-15 2010-06-17 International Business Machines Corporation Collaborative bookmarking
US7761789B2 (en) 2006-01-13 2010-07-20 Ricoh Company, Ltd. Methods for computing a navigation path
US20100191762A1 (en) * 2007-04-12 2010-07-29 Younite, Inc. Client agents for obtaining attributes from unavailable clients
US20110137946A1 (en) * 2007-04-12 2011-06-09 Younite, Inc. Individualized data sharing
US20110296308A1 (en) * 2010-05-31 2011-12-01 Woojoon Yi Mobile terminal and controlling method thereof
US8156123B2 (en) * 2004-06-25 2012-04-10 Apple Inc. Method and apparatus for processing metadata
US8584042B2 (en) 2007-03-21 2013-11-12 Ricoh Co., Ltd. Methods for scanning, printing, and copying multimedia thumbnails
US8583637B2 (en) * 2007-03-21 2013-11-12 Ricoh Co., Ltd. Coarse-to-fine navigation through paginated documents retrieved by a text search engine
US20140108444A1 (en) * 2006-03-27 2014-04-17 Sony Corporation Content list display method, content list display apparatus, content selecting and processing method, and content selecting and processing apparatus
US8812969B2 (en) 2007-03-21 2014-08-19 Ricoh Co., Ltd. Methods for authoring and interacting with multimedia representations of documents
US20150186538A1 (en) * 2013-12-31 2015-07-02 Abbyy Development Llc Method and System for Cross-Platform Searching of Multiple Information Sources and Devices
US9195756B1 (en) * 1999-08-16 2015-11-24 Dise Technologies, Llc Building a master topical index of information
US9355121B1 (en) * 2013-06-28 2016-05-31 Emc Corporation Segregating data and metadata in a file system
US9977831B1 (en) 1999-08-16 2018-05-22 Dise Technologies, Llc Targeting users' interests with a dynamic index and search engine server
US10423301B2 (en) * 2008-08-11 2019-09-24 Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc Sections of a presentation having user-definable properties
CN112835870A (en) * 2021-01-28 2021-05-25 山东浪潮通软信息科技有限公司 Content caching method and system based on user permission
US20220006619A1 (en) * 2020-07-02 2022-01-06 Slack Technologies, Inc. Encryption key management for an automated workflow
US11336648B2 (en) * 2013-11-11 2022-05-17 Amazon Technologies, Inc. Document management and collaboration system
WO2022194545A1 (en) * 2021-03-18 2022-09-22 International Business Machines Corporation Managing search queries using encrypted cache data
US11544400B2 (en) * 2017-02-24 2023-01-03 Hyland Uk Operations Limited Permissions-constrained dynamic faceting of search results in a content management system

Families Citing this family (23)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US8561146B2 (en) 2006-04-14 2013-10-15 Varonis Systems, Inc. Automatic folder access management
US20080256458A1 (en) * 2007-04-02 2008-10-16 Siemens Medical Solutions Usa, Inc. Data Access Control System for Shared Directories and Other Resources
US8438611B2 (en) 2007-10-11 2013-05-07 Varonis Systems Inc. Visualization of access permission status
US8438612B2 (en) * 2007-11-06 2013-05-07 Varonis Systems Inc. Visualization of access permission status
US20090265780A1 (en) * 2008-04-21 2009-10-22 Varonis Systems Inc. Access event collection
US20100262624A1 (en) * 2009-04-14 2010-10-14 Microsoft Corporation Discovery of inaccessible computer resources
US9641334B2 (en) * 2009-07-07 2017-05-02 Varonis Systems, Inc. Method and apparatus for ascertaining data access permission of groups of users to groups of data elements
US20110061093A1 (en) * 2009-09-09 2011-03-10 Ohad Korkus Time dependent access permissions
US8578507B2 (en) 2009-09-09 2013-11-05 Varonis Systems, Inc. Access permissions entitlement review
US10229191B2 (en) 2009-09-09 2019-03-12 Varonis Systems Ltd. Enterprise level data management
WO2011030324A1 (en) * 2009-09-09 2011-03-17 Varonis Systems, Inc. Enterprise level data management
US9870480B2 (en) 2010-05-27 2018-01-16 Varonis Systems, Inc. Automatic removal of global user security groups
US8533787B2 (en) 2011-05-12 2013-09-10 Varonis Systems, Inc. Automatic resource ownership assignment system and method
US10037358B2 (en) * 2010-05-27 2018-07-31 Varonis Systems, Inc. Data classification
US10296596B2 (en) 2010-05-27 2019-05-21 Varonis Systems, Inc. Data tagging
WO2011148375A1 (en) 2010-05-27 2011-12-01 Varonis Systems, Inc. Automation framework
US9147180B2 (en) 2010-08-24 2015-09-29 Varonis Systems, Inc. Data governance for email systems
US8527556B2 (en) * 2010-09-27 2013-09-03 Business Objects Software Limited Systems and methods to update a content store associated with a search index
EP2668563A4 (en) 2011-01-27 2015-06-10 Varonis Systems Inc Access permissions management system and method
US9680839B2 (en) 2011-01-27 2017-06-13 Varonis Systems, Inc. Access permissions management system and method
US8909673B2 (en) 2011-01-27 2014-12-09 Varonis Systems, Inc. Access permissions management system and method
JP5871583B2 (en) * 2011-11-22 2016-03-01 キヤノン株式会社 Document management apparatus, control method therefor, and program
US9251363B2 (en) 2013-02-20 2016-02-02 Varonis Systems, Inc. Systems and methodologies for controlling access to a file system

Citations (81)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4270182A (en) * 1974-12-30 1981-05-26 Asija Satya P Automated information input, storage, and retrieval system
US4704703A (en) * 1985-07-22 1987-11-03 Airus Incorporated Dynamic input processing system
US4736308A (en) * 1984-09-06 1988-04-05 Quickview Systems Search/retrieval system
US4939507A (en) * 1986-04-28 1990-07-03 Xerox Corporation Virtual and emulated objects for use in the user interface of a display screen of a display processor
US4985863A (en) * 1985-08-23 1991-01-15 Hitachi, Ltd. Document storage and retrieval system
US5008853A (en) * 1987-12-02 1991-04-16 Xerox Corporation Representation of collaborative multi-user activities relative to shared structured data objects in a networked workstation environment
US5072412A (en) * 1987-03-25 1991-12-10 Xerox Corporation User interface with multiple workspaces for sharing display system objects
US5228123A (en) * 1990-01-04 1993-07-13 Heckel Paul C Interface and application development management system based on a gene metaphor
US5241671A (en) * 1989-10-26 1993-08-31 Encyclopaedia Britannica, Inc. Multimedia search system using a plurality of entry path means which indicate interrelatedness of information
US5319745A (en) * 1991-09-16 1994-06-07 Societe Nationale Industrielle Et Aerospatiale Method and apparatus for processing alphanumeric and graphic information to create a data base
US5355497A (en) * 1992-06-10 1994-10-11 Physiotronics Corporation File directory structure generator and retrevial tool with document locator module mapping the directory structure of files to a real world hierarchical file structure
US5392428A (en) * 1991-06-28 1995-02-21 Robins; Stanford K. Text analysis system
US5504852A (en) * 1991-09-09 1996-04-02 Apple Computer, Inc. Method for creating a collection of aliases representing computer system files
US5544360A (en) * 1992-11-23 1996-08-06 Paragon Concepts, Inc. Method for accessing computer files and data, using linked categories assigned to each data file record on entry of the data file record
US5557793A (en) * 1995-01-31 1996-09-17 Unisys Corporation In an object oriented repository, a method for treating a group of objects as a single object during execution of an operation
US5592608A (en) * 1993-10-15 1997-01-07 Xerox Corporation Interactively producing indices into image and gesture-based data using unrecognized graphical objects
US5623681A (en) * 1993-11-19 1997-04-22 Waverley Holdings, Inc. Method and apparatus for synchronizing, displaying and manipulating text and image documents
US5625836A (en) * 1990-11-13 1997-04-29 International Business Machines Corporation SIMD/MIMD processing memory element (PME)
US5644657A (en) * 1992-05-27 1997-07-01 Apple Computer, Inc. Method for locating and displaying information in a pointer-based computer system
US5659735A (en) * 1994-12-09 1997-08-19 Object Technology Licensing Corp. Object-oriented system for program version and history database management system for various program components
US5758149A (en) * 1995-03-17 1998-05-26 Unisys Corporation System for optimally processing a transaction and a query to the same database concurrently
US5761678A (en) * 1996-06-26 1998-06-02 International Business Machines Corporation Creation of clone storage area with identification of base storage area and deferred cloning of metadata
US5828376A (en) * 1996-09-23 1998-10-27 J. D. Edwards World Source Company Menu control in a graphical user interface
US5832500A (en) * 1996-08-09 1998-11-03 Digital Equipment Corporation Method for searching an index
US5890147A (en) * 1997-03-07 1999-03-30 Microsoft Corporation Scope testing of documents in a search engine using document to folder mapping
US6012053A (en) * 1997-06-23 2000-01-04 Lycos, Inc. Computer system with user-controlled relevance ranking of search results
US6044466A (en) * 1997-11-25 2000-03-28 International Business Machines Corp. Flexible and dynamic derivation of permissions
US6055543A (en) * 1997-11-21 2000-04-25 Verano File wrapper containing cataloging information for content searching across multiple platforms
US6067541A (en) * 1997-09-17 2000-05-23 Microsoft Corporation Monitoring document changes in a file system of documents with the document change information stored in a persistent log
US6115717A (en) * 1997-01-23 2000-09-05 Eastman Kodak Company System and method for open space metadata-based storage and retrieval of images in an image database
US6119118A (en) * 1996-05-10 2000-09-12 Apple Computer, Inc. Method and system for extending file system metadata
US6185574B1 (en) * 1996-11-27 2001-02-06 1Vision, Inc. Multiple display file directory and file navigation system for a personal computer
US20010044837A1 (en) * 2000-03-30 2001-11-22 Iqbal Talib Methods and systems for searching an information directory
US20010054042A1 (en) * 1996-05-17 2001-12-20 Richard M. Watkins Computing system for information management
US6353823B1 (en) * 1999-03-08 2002-03-05 Intel Corporation Method and system for using associative metadata
US6363386B1 (en) * 1999-07-26 2002-03-26 Microsoft Corporation System and method for managing property information related to a resource
US20020040442A1 (en) * 2000-10-02 2002-04-04 Nobutaka Ishidera Software processing apparatus and recording medium on which program is recorded
US6370562B2 (en) * 1997-10-06 2002-04-09 Nexprise Inc. Trackpoint-based computer-implemented systems and methods for facilitating collaborative project development and communication
US6374260B1 (en) * 1996-05-24 2002-04-16 Magnifi, Inc. Method and apparatus for uploading, indexing, analyzing, and searching media content
US20020049738A1 (en) * 2000-08-03 2002-04-25 Epstein Bruce A. Information collaboration and reliability assessment
US6389412B1 (en) * 1998-12-31 2002-05-14 Intel Corporation Method and system for constructing integrated metadata
US6401097B1 (en) * 1998-01-23 2002-06-04 Mccotter Thomas M. System and method for integrated document management and related transmission and access
US6408301B1 (en) * 1999-02-23 2002-06-18 Eastman Kodak Company Interactive image storage, indexing and retrieval system
US6434548B1 (en) * 1999-12-07 2002-08-13 International Business Machines Corporation Distributed metadata searching system and method
US6466237B1 (en) * 1998-07-28 2002-10-15 Sharp Kabushiki Kaisha Information managing device for displaying thumbnail files corresponding to electronic files and searching electronic files via thumbnail file
US6473794B1 (en) * 1999-05-27 2002-10-29 Accenture Llp System for establishing plan to test components of web based framework by displaying pictorial representation and conveying indicia coded components of existing network framework
US6480835B1 (en) * 1998-12-31 2002-11-12 Intel Corporation Method and system for searching on integrated metadata
US20020169771A1 (en) * 2001-05-09 2002-11-14 Melmon Kenneth L. System & method for facilitating knowledge management
US20020184195A1 (en) * 2001-05-30 2002-12-05 Qian Richard J. Integrating content from media sources
US20020184496A1 (en) * 2001-04-16 2002-12-05 Mitchell Christopher E. Methods and arrangements for selectively maintaining parental access consent in a network environment
US20030018622A1 (en) * 2001-07-16 2003-01-23 Microsoft Corporation Method, apparatus, and computer-readable medium for searching and navigating a document database
US20030023476A1 (en) * 2001-06-29 2003-01-30 Incidentreports, Inc. System and method for recording and using incident report data
US20030084087A1 (en) * 2001-10-31 2003-05-01 Microsoft Corporation Computer system with physical presence detector to optimize computer task scheduling
US20030088567A1 (en) * 1999-04-12 2003-05-08 Michael Rosenfelt Methods of providing computer systems with bundled access to restricted-access databases
US20030088573A1 (en) * 2001-03-21 2003-05-08 Asahi Kogaku Kogyo Kabushiki Kaisha Method and apparatus for information delivery with archive containing metadata in predetermined language and semantics
US6564225B1 (en) * 2000-07-14 2003-05-13 Time Warner Entertainment Company, L.P. Method and apparatus for archiving in and retrieving images from a digital image library
US6567805B1 (en) * 2000-05-15 2003-05-20 International Business Machines Corporation Interactive automated response system
US20030100999A1 (en) * 2000-05-23 2003-05-29 Markowitz Victor M. System and method for managing gene expression data
US20030117907A1 (en) * 2001-12-22 2003-06-26 Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. Method of playing optical recording media
US20030122873A1 (en) * 2001-12-28 2003-07-03 International Business Machines Corporation System and method for visualizing and navigating content in a graphical user interface
US20030122874A1 (en) * 2001-12-28 2003-07-03 International Business Machines Corporation System and method for visualizing and navigating dynamic content in a graphical user interface
US20030135840A1 (en) * 2002-01-11 2003-07-17 Pamela Szabo Integration integrity manager
US20030135828A1 (en) * 2000-07-21 2003-07-17 International Business Machines Corporation Method and system for improving a text search
US20030140035A1 (en) * 2002-01-07 2003-07-24 Michael Burrows System and method for indexing and querying structured text
US20030144990A1 (en) * 2002-01-15 2003-07-31 Stephen Benelisha Active file change notification
US20030158855A1 (en) * 2002-02-20 2003-08-21 Farnham Shelly D. Computer system architecture for automatic context associations
US6613101B2 (en) * 1992-04-30 2003-09-02 Apple Computer, Inc. Method and apparatus for organizing information in a computer system
US20030196094A1 (en) * 2002-04-10 2003-10-16 Hillis W. Daniel Method and apparatus for authenticating the content of a distributed database
US20030200234A1 (en) * 2002-04-19 2003-10-23 George Koppich Document management system rule-based automation
US20030200218A1 (en) * 2002-04-23 2003-10-23 International Business Machines Corporation Content management system and methodology featuring query conversion capability for efficient searching
US6665657B1 (en) * 1999-11-19 2003-12-16 Niku Corporation Method and system for cross browsing of various multimedia data sources in a searchable repository
US6704739B2 (en) * 1999-01-04 2004-03-09 Adobe Systems Incorporated Tagging data assets
US6768988B2 (en) * 2001-05-29 2004-07-27 Sun Microsystems, Inc. Method and system for incorporating filtered roles in a directory system
US20040215643A1 (en) * 2001-04-18 2004-10-28 Microsoft Corporation Managing user clips
US20040221234A1 (en) * 2003-05-02 2004-11-04 Canon Kabushiki Kaisha Electronic document processing system, electronic document processing method, and storage medium storing therein program for executing the method
US20040236752A1 (en) * 2003-05-19 2004-11-25 Keli Han Document sharing in a distributed server system
US6847959B1 (en) * 2000-01-05 2005-01-25 Apple Computer, Inc. Universal interface for retrieval of information in a computer system
US6857000B2 (en) * 1997-10-22 2005-02-15 Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba Object-oriented data storage and retrieval system using index table
US20060053285A1 (en) * 2004-07-29 2006-03-09 Kimmel Gerald D Object access level
US20070027856A1 (en) * 2005-07-27 2007-02-01 Nhn Corporation Product searching system and method using search logic according to each category
US7185192B1 (en) * 2000-07-07 2007-02-27 Emc Corporation Methods and apparatus for controlling access to a resource

Family Cites Families (8)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US6330572B1 (en) * 1998-07-15 2001-12-11 Imation Corp. Hierarchical data storage management
US6751658B1 (en) 1999-10-18 2004-06-15 Apple Computer, Inc. Providing a reliable operating system for clients of a net-booted environment
WO2001046870A1 (en) 1999-12-08 2001-06-28 Amazon.Com, Inc. System and method for locating and displaying web-based product offerings
US20020184196A1 (en) 2001-06-04 2002-12-05 Lehmeier Michelle R. System and method for combining voice annotation and recognition search criteria with traditional search criteria into metadata
US7000126B2 (en) 2002-04-18 2006-02-14 Intel Corporation Method for media content presentation in consideration of system power
US20040054923A1 (en) * 2002-08-30 2004-03-18 Seago Tom E. Digital rights and content management system and method for enhanced wireless provisioning
JP4368184B2 (en) * 2003-11-19 2009-11-18 株式会社日立製作所 Blacklist emergency access blocking device
US7814327B2 (en) * 2003-12-10 2010-10-12 Mcafee, Inc. Document registration

Patent Citations (86)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4270182A (en) * 1974-12-30 1981-05-26 Asija Satya P Automated information input, storage, and retrieval system
US4736308A (en) * 1984-09-06 1988-04-05 Quickview Systems Search/retrieval system
US4704703A (en) * 1985-07-22 1987-11-03 Airus Incorporated Dynamic input processing system
US4985863A (en) * 1985-08-23 1991-01-15 Hitachi, Ltd. Document storage and retrieval system
US4939507A (en) * 1986-04-28 1990-07-03 Xerox Corporation Virtual and emulated objects for use in the user interface of a display screen of a display processor
US5072412A (en) * 1987-03-25 1991-12-10 Xerox Corporation User interface with multiple workspaces for sharing display system objects
US5008853A (en) * 1987-12-02 1991-04-16 Xerox Corporation Representation of collaborative multi-user activities relative to shared structured data objects in a networked workstation environment
US5241671A (en) * 1989-10-26 1993-08-31 Encyclopaedia Britannica, Inc. Multimedia search system using a plurality of entry path means which indicate interrelatedness of information
US5241671C1 (en) * 1989-10-26 2002-07-02 Encyclopaedia Britannica Educa Multimedia search system using a plurality of entry path means which indicate interrelatedness of information
US5228123A (en) * 1990-01-04 1993-07-13 Heckel Paul C Interface and application development management system based on a gene metaphor
US5625836A (en) * 1990-11-13 1997-04-29 International Business Machines Corporation SIMD/MIMD processing memory element (PME)
US5392428A (en) * 1991-06-28 1995-02-21 Robins; Stanford K. Text analysis system
US5504852A (en) * 1991-09-09 1996-04-02 Apple Computer, Inc. Method for creating a collection of aliases representing computer system files
US5319745A (en) * 1991-09-16 1994-06-07 Societe Nationale Industrielle Et Aerospatiale Method and apparatus for processing alphanumeric and graphic information to create a data base
US6613101B2 (en) * 1992-04-30 2003-09-02 Apple Computer, Inc. Method and apparatus for organizing information in a computer system
US5710844A (en) * 1992-05-27 1998-01-20 Apple Computer Method for searching and displaying results in a pen-based computer system
US5644657A (en) * 1992-05-27 1997-07-01 Apple Computer, Inc. Method for locating and displaying information in a pointer-based computer system
US5355497A (en) * 1992-06-10 1994-10-11 Physiotronics Corporation File directory structure generator and retrevial tool with document locator module mapping the directory structure of files to a real world hierarchical file structure
US5544360A (en) * 1992-11-23 1996-08-06 Paragon Concepts, Inc. Method for accessing computer files and data, using linked categories assigned to each data file record on entry of the data file record
US5592608A (en) * 1993-10-15 1997-01-07 Xerox Corporation Interactively producing indices into image and gesture-based data using unrecognized graphical objects
US5623681A (en) * 1993-11-19 1997-04-22 Waverley Holdings, Inc. Method and apparatus for synchronizing, displaying and manipulating text and image documents
US5845301A (en) * 1993-11-19 1998-12-01 Smartpatents, Inc. System, method, and computer program product for displaying and processing notes containing note segments linked to portions of documents
US5659735A (en) * 1994-12-09 1997-08-19 Object Technology Licensing Corp. Object-oriented system for program version and history database management system for various program components
US5557793A (en) * 1995-01-31 1996-09-17 Unisys Corporation In an object oriented repository, a method for treating a group of objects as a single object during execution of an operation
US5758149A (en) * 1995-03-17 1998-05-26 Unisys Corporation System for optimally processing a transaction and a query to the same database concurrently
US6119118A (en) * 1996-05-10 2000-09-12 Apple Computer, Inc. Method and system for extending file system metadata
US20010054042A1 (en) * 1996-05-17 2001-12-20 Richard M. Watkins Computing system for information management
US6374260B1 (en) * 1996-05-24 2002-04-16 Magnifi, Inc. Method and apparatus for uploading, indexing, analyzing, and searching media content
US5761678A (en) * 1996-06-26 1998-06-02 International Business Machines Corporation Creation of clone storage area with identification of base storage area and deferred cloning of metadata
US5832500A (en) * 1996-08-09 1998-11-03 Digital Equipment Corporation Method for searching an index
US5966710A (en) * 1996-08-09 1999-10-12 Digital Equipment Corporation Method for searching an index
US5828376A (en) * 1996-09-23 1998-10-27 J. D. Edwards World Source Company Menu control in a graphical user interface
US6185574B1 (en) * 1996-11-27 2001-02-06 1Vision, Inc. Multiple display file directory and file navigation system for a personal computer
US6115717A (en) * 1997-01-23 2000-09-05 Eastman Kodak Company System and method for open space metadata-based storage and retrieval of images in an image database
US5890147A (en) * 1997-03-07 1999-03-30 Microsoft Corporation Scope testing of documents in a search engine using document to folder mapping
US6012053A (en) * 1997-06-23 2000-01-04 Lycos, Inc. Computer system with user-controlled relevance ranking of search results
US6067541A (en) * 1997-09-17 2000-05-23 Microsoft Corporation Monitoring document changes in a file system of documents with the document change information stored in a persistent log
US6370562B2 (en) * 1997-10-06 2002-04-09 Nexprise Inc. Trackpoint-based computer-implemented systems and methods for facilitating collaborative project development and communication
US6857000B2 (en) * 1997-10-22 2005-02-15 Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba Object-oriented data storage and retrieval system using index table
US6055543A (en) * 1997-11-21 2000-04-25 Verano File wrapper containing cataloging information for content searching across multiple platforms
US6044466A (en) * 1997-11-25 2000-03-28 International Business Machines Corp. Flexible and dynamic derivation of permissions
US6401097B1 (en) * 1998-01-23 2002-06-04 Mccotter Thomas M. System and method for integrated document management and related transmission and access
US6466237B1 (en) * 1998-07-28 2002-10-15 Sharp Kabushiki Kaisha Information managing device for displaying thumbnail files corresponding to electronic files and searching electronic files via thumbnail file
US6389412B1 (en) * 1998-12-31 2002-05-14 Intel Corporation Method and system for constructing integrated metadata
US6480835B1 (en) * 1998-12-31 2002-11-12 Intel Corporation Method and system for searching on integrated metadata
US6704739B2 (en) * 1999-01-04 2004-03-09 Adobe Systems Incorporated Tagging data assets
US6408301B1 (en) * 1999-02-23 2002-06-18 Eastman Kodak Company Interactive image storage, indexing and retrieval system
US6353823B1 (en) * 1999-03-08 2002-03-05 Intel Corporation Method and system for using associative metadata
US20030088567A1 (en) * 1999-04-12 2003-05-08 Michael Rosenfelt Methods of providing computer systems with bundled access to restricted-access databases
US6473794B1 (en) * 1999-05-27 2002-10-29 Accenture Llp System for establishing plan to test components of web based framework by displaying pictorial representation and conveying indicia coded components of existing network framework
US6363386B1 (en) * 1999-07-26 2002-03-26 Microsoft Corporation System and method for managing property information related to a resource
US6665657B1 (en) * 1999-11-19 2003-12-16 Niku Corporation Method and system for cross browsing of various multimedia data sources in a searchable repository
US6434548B1 (en) * 1999-12-07 2002-08-13 International Business Machines Corporation Distributed metadata searching system and method
US6847959B1 (en) * 2000-01-05 2005-01-25 Apple Computer, Inc. Universal interface for retrieval of information in a computer system
US20010044837A1 (en) * 2000-03-30 2001-11-22 Iqbal Talib Methods and systems for searching an information directory
US6567805B1 (en) * 2000-05-15 2003-05-20 International Business Machines Corporation Interactive automated response system
US20030100999A1 (en) * 2000-05-23 2003-05-29 Markowitz Victor M. System and method for managing gene expression data
US7185192B1 (en) * 2000-07-07 2007-02-27 Emc Corporation Methods and apparatus for controlling access to a resource
US6564225B1 (en) * 2000-07-14 2003-05-13 Time Warner Entertainment Company, L.P. Method and apparatus for archiving in and retrieving images from a digital image library
US20030135828A1 (en) * 2000-07-21 2003-07-17 International Business Machines Corporation Method and system for improving a text search
US20020049738A1 (en) * 2000-08-03 2002-04-25 Epstein Bruce A. Information collaboration and reliability assessment
US20020040442A1 (en) * 2000-10-02 2002-04-04 Nobutaka Ishidera Software processing apparatus and recording medium on which program is recorded
US20030088573A1 (en) * 2001-03-21 2003-05-08 Asahi Kogaku Kogyo Kabushiki Kaisha Method and apparatus for information delivery with archive containing metadata in predetermined language and semantics
US20020184496A1 (en) * 2001-04-16 2002-12-05 Mitchell Christopher E. Methods and arrangements for selectively maintaining parental access consent in a network environment
US20040215643A1 (en) * 2001-04-18 2004-10-28 Microsoft Corporation Managing user clips
US20020169771A1 (en) * 2001-05-09 2002-11-14 Melmon Kenneth L. System & method for facilitating knowledge management
US6768988B2 (en) * 2001-05-29 2004-07-27 Sun Microsystems, Inc. Method and system for incorporating filtered roles in a directory system
US20020184195A1 (en) * 2001-05-30 2002-12-05 Qian Richard J. Integrating content from media sources
US20030023476A1 (en) * 2001-06-29 2003-01-30 Incidentreports, Inc. System and method for recording and using incident report data
US20030018622A1 (en) * 2001-07-16 2003-01-23 Microsoft Corporation Method, apparatus, and computer-readable medium for searching and navigating a document database
US20030084087A1 (en) * 2001-10-31 2003-05-01 Microsoft Corporation Computer system with physical presence detector to optimize computer task scheduling
US20030117907A1 (en) * 2001-12-22 2003-06-26 Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. Method of playing optical recording media
US20030122874A1 (en) * 2001-12-28 2003-07-03 International Business Machines Corporation System and method for visualizing and navigating dynamic content in a graphical user interface
US20030122873A1 (en) * 2001-12-28 2003-07-03 International Business Machines Corporation System and method for visualizing and navigating content in a graphical user interface
US20030140035A1 (en) * 2002-01-07 2003-07-24 Michael Burrows System and method for indexing and querying structured text
US20030135840A1 (en) * 2002-01-11 2003-07-17 Pamela Szabo Integration integrity manager
US20030144990A1 (en) * 2002-01-15 2003-07-31 Stephen Benelisha Active file change notification
US20030158855A1 (en) * 2002-02-20 2003-08-21 Farnham Shelly D. Computer system architecture for automatic context associations
US20030196094A1 (en) * 2002-04-10 2003-10-16 Hillis W. Daniel Method and apparatus for authenticating the content of a distributed database
US20030200234A1 (en) * 2002-04-19 2003-10-23 George Koppich Document management system rule-based automation
US20030200218A1 (en) * 2002-04-23 2003-10-23 International Business Machines Corporation Content management system and methodology featuring query conversion capability for efficient searching
US20040221234A1 (en) * 2003-05-02 2004-11-04 Canon Kabushiki Kaisha Electronic document processing system, electronic document processing method, and storage medium storing therein program for executing the method
US20040236752A1 (en) * 2003-05-19 2004-11-25 Keli Han Document sharing in a distributed server system
US20060053285A1 (en) * 2004-07-29 2006-03-09 Kimmel Gerald D Object access level
US20060242407A1 (en) * 2004-07-29 2006-10-26 Kimmel Gerald D Cryptographic key management
US20070027856A1 (en) * 2005-07-27 2007-02-01 Nhn Corporation Product searching system and method using search logic according to each category

Cited By (59)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US9977831B1 (en) 1999-08-16 2018-05-22 Dise Technologies, Llc Targeting users' interests with a dynamic index and search engine server
US20110047142A1 (en) * 1999-08-16 2011-02-24 Arvind Raichur Dynamic Index and Search Engine Server
US9195756B1 (en) * 1999-08-16 2015-11-24 Dise Technologies, Llc Building a master topical index of information
US20100114950A1 (en) * 1999-08-16 2010-05-06 Arvind Raichur Dynamic Index and Search Engine Server
US8504554B2 (en) 1999-08-16 2013-08-06 Raichur Revocable Trust, Arvind A. and Becky D. Raichur Dynamic index and search engine server
US9256677B2 (en) 1999-08-16 2016-02-09 Dise Technologies, Llc Dynamic index and search engine server
US9904732B2 (en) 1999-08-16 2018-02-27 Dise Technologies, Llc Dynamic index and search engine server
US20080037873A1 (en) * 2003-01-29 2008-02-14 Kathrin Berkner Reformatting documents using document analysis information
US7792362B2 (en) 2003-01-29 2010-09-07 Ricoh Co., Ltd. Reformatting documents using document analysis information
US8156123B2 (en) * 2004-06-25 2012-04-10 Apple Inc. Method and apparatus for processing metadata
US20090119266A1 (en) * 2005-04-04 2009-05-07 Younite, Inc. Distributed management framework for personal attributes
US8620866B2 (en) 2005-04-04 2013-12-31 Younite, Inc. Distributed management framework for personal attributes
US20090125523A1 (en) * 2005-04-04 2009-05-14 Younite, Inc. Distributed management framework for personal attributes
US8938423B2 (en) 2005-04-04 2015-01-20 Younite, Inc. Distributed management framework for personal attributes
US20070162450A1 (en) * 2005-04-04 2007-07-12 Anthony Siress Query object permissions establishment system and methods
US7882565B2 (en) * 2005-09-02 2011-02-01 Microsoft Corporation Controlled access to objects or areas in an electronic document
US20070056045A1 (en) * 2005-09-02 2007-03-08 Microsoft Corporation Controlled access to objects or areas in an electronic document
US7761789B2 (en) 2006-01-13 2010-07-20 Ricoh Company, Ltd. Methods for computing a navigation path
US20070208996A1 (en) * 2006-03-06 2007-09-06 Kathrin Berkner Automated document layout design
US7788579B2 (en) 2006-03-06 2010-08-31 Ricoh Co., Ltd. Automated document layout design
US9507863B2 (en) * 2006-03-27 2016-11-29 Sony Corporation Content list display method, content list display apparatus, content selecting and processing method, and content selecting and processing apparatus
US20140108444A1 (en) * 2006-03-27 2014-04-17 Sony Corporation Content list display method, content list display apparatus, content selecting and processing method, and content selecting and processing apparatus
US20170031549A1 (en) * 2006-03-27 2017-02-02 Sony Corporation Content list display method, content list display apparatus, content selecting and processing method, and content selecting and processing apparatus
US7644067B2 (en) * 2006-06-14 2010-01-05 Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba System and method for accessing content from selected sources via a document processing device
US20070294204A1 (en) * 2006-06-14 2007-12-20 Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba System and method for accessing content from selected sources via a document processing device
US7788272B2 (en) * 2006-08-04 2010-08-31 Xerox Corporation Document catalog system
JP2008041090A (en) * 2006-08-04 2008-02-21 Xerox Corp Document catalog system
US20080033916A1 (en) * 2006-08-04 2008-02-07 Elton Ray Document catalog system
US8099432B2 (en) 2007-01-16 2012-01-17 Microsoft Corporation Efficient paging of search query results
US20080172377A1 (en) * 2007-01-16 2008-07-17 Microsoft Corporation Efficient paging of search query results
US7505973B2 (en) 2007-01-16 2009-03-17 Microsoft Corporation Efficient paging of search query results
US20090144250A1 (en) * 2007-01-16 2009-06-04 Microsoft Corporation Efficient Paging of Search Query Results
US8612482B2 (en) 2007-01-16 2013-12-17 Microsoft Corporation Efficient paging of search query results
US8584042B2 (en) 2007-03-21 2013-11-12 Ricoh Co., Ltd. Methods for scanning, printing, and copying multimedia thumbnails
US8583637B2 (en) * 2007-03-21 2013-11-12 Ricoh Co., Ltd. Coarse-to-fine navigation through paginated documents retrieved by a text search engine
US8812969B2 (en) 2007-03-21 2014-08-19 Ricoh Co., Ltd. Methods for authoring and interacting with multimedia representations of documents
US20080235262A1 (en) * 2007-03-21 2008-09-25 Holm Aaron H Digital file management system with file mapping for high resolution and other images
US8463813B2 (en) 2007-04-12 2013-06-11 Younite, Inc. Individualized data sharing
US20110137946A1 (en) * 2007-04-12 2011-06-09 Younite, Inc. Individualized data sharing
US20100191762A1 (en) * 2007-04-12 2010-07-29 Younite, Inc. Client agents for obtaining attributes from unavailable clients
US8108533B2 (en) 2007-04-12 2012-01-31 Younite, Inc. Client agents for obtaining attributes from unavailable clients
US8239351B2 (en) * 2007-06-07 2012-08-07 Apple Inc. Methods and systems for managing permissions data
US20080306954A1 (en) * 2007-06-07 2008-12-11 Hornqvist John M Methods and systems for managing permissions data
US10423301B2 (en) * 2008-08-11 2019-09-24 Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc Sections of a presentation having user-definable properties
US8275789B2 (en) * 2008-12-15 2012-09-25 International Business Machines Corporation Collaborative bookmarking
US20100153364A1 (en) * 2008-12-15 2010-06-17 International Business Machines Corporation Collaborative bookmarking
WO2010079003A1 (en) * 2008-12-15 2010-07-15 International Business Machines Corporation Collaborative bookmarking
US20110296308A1 (en) * 2010-05-31 2011-12-01 Woojoon Yi Mobile terminal and controlling method thereof
US8996999B2 (en) * 2010-05-31 2015-03-31 Lg Electronics Inc. Mobile terminal determining whether to transmit display data according to privacy property, and controlling method thereof
US9355121B1 (en) * 2013-06-28 2016-05-31 Emc Corporation Segregating data and metadata in a file system
US11336648B2 (en) * 2013-11-11 2022-05-17 Amazon Technologies, Inc. Document management and collaboration system
US10209859B2 (en) * 2013-12-31 2019-02-19 Findo, Inc. Method and system for cross-platform searching of multiple information sources and devices
US20150186538A1 (en) * 2013-12-31 2015-07-02 Abbyy Development Llc Method and System for Cross-Platform Searching of Multiple Information Sources and Devices
US20150186478A1 (en) * 2013-12-31 2015-07-02 Abbyy Development Llc Method and System for Tree Representation of Search Results
US11544400B2 (en) * 2017-02-24 2023-01-03 Hyland Uk Operations Limited Permissions-constrained dynamic faceting of search results in a content management system
US20220006619A1 (en) * 2020-07-02 2022-01-06 Slack Technologies, Inc. Encryption key management for an automated workflow
US11804954B2 (en) * 2020-07-02 2023-10-31 Salesforce, Inc. Encryption key management for an automated workflow
CN112835870A (en) * 2021-01-28 2021-05-25 山东浪潮通软信息科技有限公司 Content caching method and system based on user permission
WO2022194545A1 (en) * 2021-03-18 2022-09-22 International Business Machines Corporation Managing search queries using encrypted cache data

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
US8190638B2 (en) 2012-05-29
US20070112743A1 (en) 2007-05-17

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US20220342892A1 (en) Methods and systems for managing data
US8190638B2 (en) Methods and systems for managing data
US9081872B2 (en) Methods and systems for managing permissions data and/or indexes
US8239351B2 (en) Methods and systems for managing permissions data
US9460096B2 (en) Methods and systems for managing data
US20100306187A1 (en) Methods And Systems For Managing Data
US8452751B2 (en) Methods and systems for managing data
US20090216776A1 (en) Methods and systems for managing data

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AS Assignment

Owner name: APPLE COMPUTER, INC., CALIFORNIA

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:GIAMPAOLO, DOMINIC;ARROUYE, YAN;REEL/FRAME:016491/0537

Effective date: 20050706

AS Assignment

Owner name: APPLE INC., CALIFORNIA

Free format text: CHANGE OF NAME;ASSIGNOR:APPLE COMPUTER, INC., A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION;REEL/FRAME:019241/0028

Effective date: 20070109

STCB Information on status: application discontinuation

Free format text: ABANDONED -- AFTER EXAMINER'S ANSWER OR BOARD OF APPEALS DECISION