US20060047342A1 - Haptic apparatus - Google Patents
Haptic apparatus Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- US20060047342A1 US20060047342A1 US11/143,696 US14369605A US2006047342A1 US 20060047342 A1 US20060047342 A1 US 20060047342A1 US 14369605 A US14369605 A US 14369605A US 2006047342 A1 US2006047342 A1 US 2006047342A1
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- anatomical segment
- segment
- motion
- anatomical
- elongate member
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Granted
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F3/00—Input arrangements for transferring data to be processed into a form capable of being handled by the computer; Output arrangements for transferring data from processing unit to output unit, e.g. interface arrangements
- G06F3/01—Input arrangements or combined input and output arrangements for interaction between user and computer
- G06F3/011—Arrangements for interaction with the human body, e.g. for user immersion in virtual reality
- G06F3/014—Hand-worn input/output arrangements, e.g. data gloves
Definitions
- Some haptic devices may be capable of providing force feedback to all five fingers.
- an exoskeleton may be worn over a glove, which may provide measurement information about hand gestures, through several embedded sensors that register the motion at various joints.
- a host computer may recognize the position of the hand and fingers with respect to a virtual object being approached.
- the computer may perform collision detection, and send resulting forces to a force control unit that may have a servomotor for each finger.
- a sheathed cable may connect the finger tip through cable guide bridges to a pulley mounted on a motor shaft.
- the motor rotation may be controlled by setting the effective cable length to be such that the finger is stopped when its virtual counterpart touches the virtual object.
- haptic devices may be quite costly, and may suffer from system complexity. Users of these haptic devices may be inconvenienced by the requirement of an additional sensor glove. The mechanical bandwidth of these devices may be quite low, resulting in an unrealistic feeling of grasp. Forces may be unrealistically exerted on the back of the fingers and hand as well, when a virtual object is held, due to cable guide bridges mounted on the back of fingers. Also, these haptic devices may provide force feedback on finger tips only, so that holding a ball may give the same feeling as holding a disk, for instance. This may limit their applicability.
- a haptic apparatus may include a plate element positionable to extend over an anatomical segment of a user, and an elongate member coupled to the plate element and configured to be movably mounted onto the anatomical segment so as to remain substantially vertical and substantially perpendicular to the anatomical segment while the anatomical segment undergoes a motion.
- the haptic apparatus may further include a motion restrictor responsive to a control signal to impede the motion of the anatomical segment by generating an opposing force along the elongate member in a direction normal to the anatomical segment, thereby providing tactile feedback to the user.
- a haptic apparatus may include a plurality of assemblies.
- Each assembly may include an exoskeleton plate positionable so as to extend over an anatomical segment of a user, and an elongate member coupled to the exoskeleton plate and configured to be movably mounted onto the anatomical segment so as to remain substantially vertical and substantially perpendicular to the anatomical segment while the anatomical segment undergoes a motion.
- Each assembly may further include a motion restrictor responsive to a control signal to impede the motion of the anatomical segment by generating an opposing feedback force along the elongate member in a direction normal to the anatomical segment, thereby providing tactile feedback to the user.
- a haptic apparatus may include an exoskeleton plate positionable so as to extend over an anatomical segment of a user, and an elongate member coupled to the exoskeleton plate and configured to be movably mounted onto the anatomical segment so as to remain substantially perpendicular to the anatomical segment while the anatomical segment undergoes a motion.
- the haptic apparatus may further include force feedback means responsive to a control signal for impeding the motion of the anatomical segment by generating an opposing feedback force along the elongate member in a direction normal to the anatomical segment, thereby providing tactile feedback to the user.
- a method may include movably mounting an elongate member to an anatomical segment of a user so that the elongate member remains substantially vertical and perpendicular to the anatomical segment while the anatomical segment undergoes a motion.
- the method may further include sensing a change in the position of the anatomical segment with respect to a virtual object during the motion, and, upon detection of an imminent collision between the anatomical segment and the virtual object, impeding further motion of the anatomical segment by generating an opposing force along the elongate member in a direction normal to the anatomical segment, thereby providing tactile feedback to the user.
- FIG. 1 schematically illustrates reaction forces that may be generated when objects are grasped by a user's hand and fingers.
- FIG. 2 illustrates a haptic apparatus including an exoskeleton plate and a toothed blade mounted on a single finger segment.
- FIGS. 3A and 3B illustrate a haptic apparatus in which a plurality of assemblies are mounted on a corresponding plurality of fingers.
- FIGS. 4A, 4B , and 4 C illustrate different ways in which a toothed blade may become engaged onto an edge of the exoskeleton plate.
- FIGS. 5A, 5B , and 5 C illustrate embodiments in which a sheathed cable with a shaped memory wire core may be used to rotate the toothed blade.
- FIG. 6 illustrates an embodiment of a haptic apparatus that can provide tactile feedback without using a position sensing glove.
- FIGS. 7A and 7B illustrate an embodiment of a haptic apparatus in which a latch mechanism is used to restrict motion of a user's finger segment.
- Haptic apparatuses may implement full-hand haptic grasp systems. These systems may provide users with a realistic feeling of grasp, applicable to all finger segments (e.g. phalanges) as well as to the palm of the hand, as opposed to finger tips only.
- FIG. 1 schematically illustrates resistive or opposing forces that may be generated when objects are grasped by a user's hand and fingers.
- numerous segments under the hand and different finger segments may be involve when different objects, such as the illustrated spherical ball 102 and disk 104 .
- the reaction forces exerted on the finger and hand segments are generally in a direction perpendicular to the contact point between the segments and the object.
- FIG. 2 illustrates a haptic apparatus 200 mounted on a single finger segment of a user.
- the haptic apparatus 200 includes a plate element 202 ; an elongate member 204 coupled to the plate element 202 ; and a motion restrictor 206 .
- the plate element 202 may be positioned to extend above the finger 208 of the user.
- the plate element 202 may be an exoskeleton plate (henceforth referred to as “ExoPlate”).
- the elongate member 204 can be rotatably (or otherwise movably) mounted onto the finger segment in a way that it always stays substantially vertical and substantially perpendicular to the finger segment, as the finger segment moves.
- the motion restrictor 206 may be configured to impede further motion of finger segment, for example in response to a control signal from a controller (not shown) that detects one or more collisions between a virtual object and a virtual counterpart of the finger segment.
- the motion restrictor 206 may impede the motion of the finger segment by generating an opposing feedback force along the vertical member 204 in a direction normal to the finger segment, thereby providing tactile feedback to the user.
- the elongate member may be a straight toothed blade 204 which can be rotated on demand by 90 degrees.
- the apparatus 200 may accomplish feedback force generation by activating rotation of the blade 204 .
- Such a rotation engages the teeth of the blade 204 in the protruded edge 203 of the ExoPlate 202 , which extends above a finger.
- the ExoPlate 202 may be made of a solid and light thin sheet of strong material such as carbon composite, or preferably a transparent material such as polycarbonate. Use of transparent material eases the wearing of the device as the ExoPlate 202 would not obstruct the view of the fingers not directly in the line of sight.
- the motion restrictor may be a rotation actuator 206 which is strapped over the finger segment.
- the lower end of the toothed blade 204 may be attached to the rotation actuator 206 .
- the opposing force generated by such rotation and engagement may be a bidirectional force, i.e. may include both an upward component and a downward component along the blade 204 .
- the blade rotation may be activated by transmission of a control signal from the controller.
- the controller may sense the motion of the finger segment, and monitor the relative position of a virtual counterpart of the finger segment with respect to a virtual object.
- the controller may generate the control signal once the virtual object collides with the associated virtual finger segment.
- one or more position sensors may detect the position and motion of the finger segment, and transmit information relating to the detected position and motion to the controller, which may generate the control signal when it detects a collision between the virtual counterpart of the finger segment and the virtual object.
- the resulting rotation of the blade 204 may be immediate, and may be accomplished by various actuation components such a rotary solenoid or a small electric motor.
- the electric motor at 90 degree end of range points may run into mechanical stops and stalls, and a return may be made possible by a spiral spring or reverse current.
- the actuation of rotation and force feedback generation is shown for one finger segment only, and as being applied to the finger tip.
- the apparatus 200 does not exert any fictitious pressure on the back of the finger.
- Each ExoPlate 202 may pivot sideways, following the sideway motion of the associated finger. Such sideways pivoting may be accomplished by attachment of simple small solid sheets (not shown) to the base of the ExoPlates 202 .
- the small sheet elements may extend on each side of the finger, and may transfer the sideway motion of the finger to the ExoPlate 202 .
- Each ExoPlate 202 may also optionally pivot toward the palm of the hand. This motion may be restricted by a servo motor (not shown), either remotely or by locally pulling and releasing a restraining cable 209 . This optional pivoting action can be used to provide a proportional force feedback for grasping elastic objects such as a sponge ball.
- a slider block 212 may be used.
- the slider block 212 may move along the edge of the ExoPlate 202 while always engaged in a groove 211 on the plate 202 , the groove 211 serving as a guideway.
- the side surfaces on the opening on the slider block 212 through which the blade 204 traverses may be rounded. This may allow the blade 204 to move freely, without getting its teeth stuck in sharp edge on the block 212 .
- haptic apparatus 200 is described as being mounted on a finger segment, in principle it may be mounted on any other anatomical segment of the user.
- each blade assembly may be independently used for each finger segment may allow for control of every finger segment without mechanical complication.
- control of more than one finger segment may not be possible because of the dependencies of motion of each finger segment, and the resulting mechanical intractability.
- FIGS. 3A and 3B illustrate a haptic apparatus 300 in which a plurality of blade-ExoPlate assemblies are mounted on a corresponding plurality of fingers.
- Each blade 304 in the apparatus 300 may always be substantially perpendicular to its associated finger segment, and hence when it becomes engaged to an edge 303 of an ExoPlate 302 , it may apply a force which is in the direction of the normal to the finger segment.
- FIGS. 4A, 4B , and 4 C illustrate different ways in which a toothed blade 404 may become engaged onto an edge 403 of the exoskeleton plate 402 .
- the ExoPlate is made of wearable materials such as plastics (e.g., polycarbonate), it may not be desirable to engage the blade teeth with the ExoPlate, as the plate edge may be damages and wear out over time.
- the blade teeth may become engaged in a small hard metal edge 405 installed in the slider block 412 .
- the blade 404 may not, in certain positions, be perpendicular to the inner edge of the ExoPlate 402 . In these cases, even though the blade 404 may get locked to the slider block 412 upon rotation, it may unwontedly pull and slip the slider block 412 along its guide. This slippage may be undesirable, because it may not allow the locking of the finger segment at the desired position.
- a metallic piece with two sharp edges may be used which upon pull-down by the blade 404 may touch the inner surface of the ExoPlate guide groove, acting as a break mechanism. To keep these sharp edges away during free slide an elastic spring component (indicated with reference numerals 407 in FIGS. 4A and 4C ) may be used.
- the toothed blade 404 may be also rotated remotely by means of a sheathed cable which may be pulled at a remote location by a linear solenoid.
- the finger end of the cable may in turn rotate a pulley around which the cable core is wound.
- a spring may return the pulley upon solenoid release.
- a sheathed cable with a Shaped Memory Wire (henceforth referred to as “SMW”) core may be used, as shown in FIGS. 5A, 5B , and 5 C.
- a sheathed cable 520 with a shaped memory wire core 522 are used to rotate the toothed blade 504 .
- the wire end may be attached to the base of the toothed blade.
- An SMW may have many properties. One property may be that an SMW may return to a given length after it is heated, usually through passage of an electric current. Another property may be that an SMW typically does not easily buckle or bend, and when one end of a SMW is rotated, the torsion may be transferred along the length of the wire, even if the wire has many twists and turns.
- SMWs may be useful in the embodiments illustrated in FIGS. 5A, 5B , and 5 C.
- the SMW wire 522 may be bent by passage through the angle tube at the finger side, and as it emerges it may stay straight and hence perpendicular to the associated finger segment.
- the SMW wire 522 may be rotated remotely by a rotary solenoid, and the rotation action may be transferred to the finger side. When attached to the toothed blade, the wire rotation may in turn rotate the blade.
- Mechanical stops may be used at the finger side and a rotation of more than 90 degrees may be applied to compensate for possible wire torsions.
- a servo motor 530 may be attached to each wire end to provide “independent” proportional force feed back to each segment of the finger.
- the wire may be wound around the servo motor pulley which provides it with reciprocal movement, while the rotary solenoid may apply rotation by means of a rod with a square cross section.
- a realistic feeling of grasp of objects made of several materials with various elasticity property e.g., a screw driver with a soft rubber handle coating
- FIG. 6 illustrates an embodiment of a haptic apparatus 600 that can provide tactile feedback without using a position sensing glove.
- the glove may be avoided if a strip of material with electrical resistance is places along the edge of the ExoPlate 602 where it would come in contact with brushes attached to the slider block 612 .
- each blade/slider block assembly may act as the moving part of a potentiometer. By measuring the electrical resistance between the blades, the position of all blades and hence the associated finger segments may be determined. All finger sideway motions may be detected by conventional potentiometers mounted at the pivoting points of the ExoPlates.
- FIGS. 7A and 7B illustrate an embodiment of a haptic apparatus in which a latch mechanism is used to restrict motion of a user's finger segment.
- the blade 704 may be passively fixed onto the finger strap.
- the electric power may be transferred to the slider block 712 through two conductive strips 740 attached to the non-conductive blade 704 .
- the power in the conductive strips 740 may be delivered by means of brushes 750 to an electro-magnetic coil 741 , which may attract two metallic latches 742 simultaneously.
- the latches 742 may each drive a pin 744 into apertures placed on the blade 704 and on the ExoPlate 702 , respectively.
- the pin motions may be independent of one another. If one pin does not line up with a hole, it may not restrict the motion of the other pin.
- the slider block 712 can be pinned onto the ExoPlate 702 , and at the same time the blade 704 may be pinned onto the slider block 712 whenever the power is applied to the conductive strips 740 .
- the latch mechanism illustrated in FIGS. 7A and 7B may be built in miniature scale, because the power required is very small since only the small latches on the slider block need to be moved.
- the electric wires connected to the strips 740 at the base of the blade 704 may be in coil form, such as a telephone handset wire, to allow the rising of the blade end.
- haptic apparatuses have been described that provide a user with a realistic feeling of grasp, and that are applicable to all finger segments and the palm, as opposed to being applicable to finger tips only.
- the haptic apparatuses described above may be capable of responding to gesture signals at relatively high frequencies, thereby providing an extremely realistic and dynamic sense of grasp.
- These haptic apparatus may have maximum numbers of pressure points for force feedback, and hence may provide force feedback to a large number of relevant pressure points, up to about fifteen. No unrealistic or unnecessary force may be exerted on unwanted areas on fingers.
- Force feedback may be bidirectional, i.e., force may be applied both under and above each finger segment.
- the force feedback mechanism may be engaged at the hand area rather than at remote cable-connected locations that generally result in a sluggish and unrealistic sense of grasp, because of cable stretch and accumulation of various mechanical backlashes.
- These haptic apparatuses may perform gesture measurement without need for additional devices such as exoskeleton gloves, and therefore may be worn on the bare hand with minimal intrusive hardware.
- these haptic apparatuses may be manufactured at a relatively low cost.
Abstract
Description
- This application claims the benefit of priority under 35 U.S.C. § 119(e) from U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 60/577,330 entitled “OmniGrasp—A Full-Hand Cyber Grasp System” and filed on Jun. 4, 2004, by inventor Behrokh Khoshnevis, attorney docket no. 28080-137. Provisional application Ser. No. 60/577,330 is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
- This work was funded in part by NSF Grant No. ERC-EEC-9529152. The government may have certain rights in the invention.
- There may be numerous applications for a force feedback interface in dexterous task simulations, in which it may be desirable to control forces on independent fingers. A number of haptic devices have been devised that attempt to create the feeling of grasping an object by fingers and hand.
- Some haptic devices may be capable of providing force feedback to all five fingers. For example, an exoskeleton may be worn over a glove, which may provide measurement information about hand gestures, through several embedded sensors that register the motion at various joints. A host computer may recognize the position of the hand and fingers with respect to a virtual object being approached. The computer may perform collision detection, and send resulting forces to a force control unit that may have a servomotor for each finger. For each finger, a sheathed cable may connect the finger tip through cable guide bridges to a pulley mounted on a motor shaft. The motor rotation may be controlled by setting the effective cable length to be such that the finger is stopped when its virtual counterpart touches the virtual object.
- These haptic devices may be quite costly, and may suffer from system complexity. Users of these haptic devices may be inconvenienced by the requirement of an additional sensor glove. The mechanical bandwidth of these devices may be quite low, resulting in an unrealistic feeling of grasp. Forces may be unrealistically exerted on the back of the fingers and hand as well, when a virtual object is held, due to cable guide bridges mounted on the back of fingers. Also, these haptic devices may provide force feedback on finger tips only, so that holding a ball may give the same feeling as holding a disk, for instance. This may limit their applicability.
- A haptic apparatus may include a plate element positionable to extend over an anatomical segment of a user, and an elongate member coupled to the plate element and configured to be movably mounted onto the anatomical segment so as to remain substantially vertical and substantially perpendicular to the anatomical segment while the anatomical segment undergoes a motion. The haptic apparatus may further include a motion restrictor responsive to a control signal to impede the motion of the anatomical segment by generating an opposing force along the elongate member in a direction normal to the anatomical segment, thereby providing tactile feedback to the user.
- A haptic apparatus may include a plurality of assemblies. Each assembly may include an exoskeleton plate positionable so as to extend over an anatomical segment of a user, and an elongate member coupled to the exoskeleton plate and configured to be movably mounted onto the anatomical segment so as to remain substantially vertical and substantially perpendicular to the anatomical segment while the anatomical segment undergoes a motion. Each assembly may further include a motion restrictor responsive to a control signal to impede the motion of the anatomical segment by generating an opposing feedback force along the elongate member in a direction normal to the anatomical segment, thereby providing tactile feedback to the user.
- A haptic apparatus may include an exoskeleton plate positionable so as to extend over an anatomical segment of a user, and an elongate member coupled to the exoskeleton plate and configured to be movably mounted onto the anatomical segment so as to remain substantially perpendicular to the anatomical segment while the anatomical segment undergoes a motion. The haptic apparatus may further include force feedback means responsive to a control signal for impeding the motion of the anatomical segment by generating an opposing feedback force along the elongate member in a direction normal to the anatomical segment, thereby providing tactile feedback to the user.
- A method may include movably mounting an elongate member to an anatomical segment of a user so that the elongate member remains substantially vertical and perpendicular to the anatomical segment while the anatomical segment undergoes a motion. The method may further include sensing a change in the position of the anatomical segment with respect to a virtual object during the motion, and, upon detection of an imminent collision between the anatomical segment and the virtual object, impeding further motion of the anatomical segment by generating an opposing force along the elongate member in a direction normal to the anatomical segment, thereby providing tactile feedback to the user.
-
FIG. 1 schematically illustrates reaction forces that may be generated when objects are grasped by a user's hand and fingers. -
FIG. 2 illustrates a haptic apparatus including an exoskeleton plate and a toothed blade mounted on a single finger segment. -
FIGS. 3A and 3B illustrate a haptic apparatus in which a plurality of assemblies are mounted on a corresponding plurality of fingers. -
FIGS. 4A, 4B , and 4C illustrate different ways in which a toothed blade may become engaged onto an edge of the exoskeleton plate. -
FIGS. 5A, 5B , and 5C illustrate embodiments in which a sheathed cable with a shaped memory wire core may be used to rotate the toothed blade. -
FIG. 6 illustrates an embodiment of a haptic apparatus that can provide tactile feedback without using a position sensing glove. -
FIGS. 7A and 7B illustrate an embodiment of a haptic apparatus in which a latch mechanism is used to restrict motion of a user's finger segment. - Haptic apparatuses are described that may implement full-hand haptic grasp systems. These systems may provide users with a realistic feeling of grasp, applicable to all finger segments (e.g. phalanges) as well as to the palm of the hand, as opposed to finger tips only.
-
FIG. 1 schematically illustrates resistive or opposing forces that may be generated when objects are grasped by a user's hand and fingers. As seen fromFIG. 1 , numerous segments under the hand and different finger segments may be involve when different objects, such as the illustratedspherical ball 102 anddisk 104. As shown by the arrows inFIG. 1 , the reaction forces exerted on the finger and hand segments are generally in a direction perpendicular to the contact point between the segments and the object. -
FIG. 2 illustrates ahaptic apparatus 200 mounted on a single finger segment of a user. In overview, thehaptic apparatus 200 includes aplate element 202; anelongate member 204 coupled to theplate element 202; and a motion restrictor 206. Theplate element 202 may be positioned to extend above thefinger 208 of the user. Theplate element 202 may be an exoskeleton plate (henceforth referred to as “ExoPlate”). Theelongate member 204 can be rotatably (or otherwise movably) mounted onto the finger segment in a way that it always stays substantially vertical and substantially perpendicular to the finger segment, as the finger segment moves. - The motion restrictor 206 may be configured to impede further motion of finger segment, for example in response to a control signal from a controller (not shown) that detects one or more collisions between a virtual object and a virtual counterpart of the finger segment. The motion restrictor 206 may impede the motion of the finger segment by generating an opposing feedback force along the
vertical member 204 in a direction normal to the finger segment, thereby providing tactile feedback to the user. - In the illustrated embodiment, the elongate member may be a straight
toothed blade 204 which can be rotated on demand by 90 degrees. Theapparatus 200 may accomplish feedback force generation by activating rotation of theblade 204. Such a rotation engages the teeth of theblade 204 in theprotruded edge 203 of the ExoPlate 202, which extends above a finger. The ExoPlate 202 may be made of a solid and light thin sheet of strong material such as carbon composite, or preferably a transparent material such as polycarbonate. Use of transparent material eases the wearing of the device as the ExoPlate 202 would not obstruct the view of the fingers not directly in the line of sight. - In this embodiment, the motion restrictor may be a rotation actuator 206 which is strapped over the finger segment. The lower end of the
toothed blade 204 may be attached to the rotation actuator 206. When theblade 204 becomes engaged in the protrudedlower edge 203 of theExoPlate 202, it may stop the motion of the associated finger segment along the length of theblade 204. The opposing force generated by such rotation and engagement may be a bidirectional force, i.e. may include both an upward component and a downward component along theblade 204. - The blade rotation may be activated by transmission of a control signal from the controller. The controller may sense the motion of the finger segment, and monitor the relative position of a virtual counterpart of the finger segment with respect to a virtual object. The controller may generate the control signal once the virtual object collides with the associated virtual finger segment. Alternatively, one or more position sensors (not shown) may detect the position and motion of the finger segment, and transmit information relating to the detected position and motion to the controller, which may generate the control signal when it detects a collision between the virtual counterpart of the finger segment and the virtual object.
- The resulting rotation of the
blade 204 may be immediate, and may be accomplished by various actuation components such a rotary solenoid or a small electric motor. The electric motor at 90 degree end of range points may run into mechanical stops and stalls, and a return may be made possible by a spiral spring or reverse current. - In the embodiment illustrated in
FIG. 2 , the actuation of rotation and force feedback generation is shown for one finger segment only, and as being applied to the finger tip. Theapparatus 200 does not exert any fictitious pressure on the back of the finger. - Each
ExoPlate 202 may pivot sideways, following the sideway motion of the associated finger. Such sideways pivoting may be accomplished by attachment of simple small solid sheets (not shown) to the base of theExoPlates 202. The small sheet elements may extend on each side of the finger, and may transfer the sideway motion of the finger to theExoPlate 202. - Each
ExoPlate 202 may also optionally pivot toward the palm of the hand. This motion may be restricted by a servo motor (not shown), either remotely or by locally pulling and releasing a restrainingcable 209. This optional pivoting action can be used to provide a proportional force feedback for grasping elastic objects such as a sponge ball. - To keep the blade in close vicinity of the protruded edge of the
ExoPlate 202, aslider block 212 may be used. Theslider block 212 may move along the edge of theExoPlate 202 while always engaged in agroove 211 on theplate 202, thegroove 211 serving as a guideway. The side surfaces on the opening on theslider block 212 through which theblade 204 traverses may be rounded. This may allow theblade 204 to move freely, without getting its teeth stuck in sharp edge on theblock 212. - While the
haptic apparatus 200 is described as being mounted on a finger segment, in principle it may be mounted on any other anatomical segment of the user. - A configuration in which each blade assembly may be independently used for each finger segment may allow for control of every finger segment without mechanical complication. In cable based designs, on the other hand, control of more than one finger segment may not be possible because of the dependencies of motion of each finger segment, and the resulting mechanical intractability.
-
FIGS. 3A and 3B illustrate a haptic apparatus 300 in which a plurality of blade-ExoPlate assemblies are mounted on a corresponding plurality of fingers. Each blade 304 in the apparatus 300 may always be substantially perpendicular to its associated finger segment, and hence when it becomes engaged to anedge 303 of anExoPlate 302, it may apply a force which is in the direction of the normal to the finger segment. -
FIGS. 4A, 4B , and 4C illustrate different ways in which atoothed blade 404 may become engaged onto anedge 403 of theexoskeleton plate 402. If the ExoPlate is made of wearable materials such as plastics (e.g., polycarbonate), it may not be desirable to engage the blade teeth with the ExoPlate, as the plate edge may be damages and wear out over time. In the embodiment illustrated inFIG. 4A , the blade teeth may become engaged in a smallhard metal edge 405 installed in theslider block 412. - In the embodiments illustrated in
FIGS. 4B and 4C , theblade 404 may not, in certain positions, be perpendicular to the inner edge of theExoPlate 402. In these cases, even though theblade 404 may get locked to theslider block 412 upon rotation, it may unwontedly pull and slip theslider block 412 along its guide. This slippage may be undesirable, because it may not allow the locking of the finger segment at the desired position. To remedy this situation, a metallic piece with two sharp edges may be used which upon pull-down by theblade 404 may touch the inner surface of the ExoPlate guide groove, acting as a break mechanism. To keep these sharp edges away during free slide an elastic spring component (indicated withreference numerals 407 inFIGS. 4A and 4C ) may be used. - The
toothed blade 404 may be also rotated remotely by means of a sheathed cable which may be pulled at a remote location by a linear solenoid. The finger end of the cable may in turn rotate a pulley around which the cable core is wound. A spring may return the pulley upon solenoid release. - Alternatively, a sheathed cable with a Shaped Memory Wire (henceforth referred to as “SMW”) core may be used, as shown in
FIGS. 5A, 5B , and 5C. In these embodiments, a sheathedcable 520 with a shapedmemory wire core 522 are used to rotate the toothed blade 504. The wire end may be attached to the base of the toothed blade. - An SMW may have many properties. One property may be that an SMW may return to a given length after it is heated, usually through passage of an electric current. Another property may be that an SMW typically does not easily buckle or bend, and when one end of a SMW is rotated, the torsion may be transferred along the length of the wire, even if the wire has many twists and turns.
- The latter property of SMWs may be useful in the embodiments illustrated in
FIGS. 5A, 5B , and 5C. In these embodiments theSMW wire 522 may be bent by passage through the angle tube at the finger side, and as it emerges it may stay straight and hence perpendicular to the associated finger segment. Also, theSMW wire 522 may be rotated remotely by a rotary solenoid, and the rotation action may be transferred to the finger side. When attached to the toothed blade, the wire rotation may in turn rotate the blade. Mechanical stops may be used at the finger side and a rotation of more than 90 degrees may be applied to compensate for possible wire torsions. - A
servo motor 530 may be attached to each wire end to provide “independent” proportional force feed back to each segment of the finger. The wire may be wound around the servo motor pulley which provides it with reciprocal movement, while the rotary solenoid may apply rotation by means of a rod with a square cross section. A realistic feeling of grasp of objects made of several materials with various elasticity property (e.g., a screw driver with a soft rubber handle coating) may be made possible, in this configuration. - The haptic apparatus described above may or may not be used with a position sensing glove.
FIG. 6 illustrates an embodiment of ahaptic apparatus 600 that can provide tactile feedback without using a position sensing glove. The glove may be avoided if a strip of material with electrical resistance is places along the edge of theExoPlate 602 where it would come in contact with brushes attached to the slider block 612. If thetoothed blades 604 are made out of metal, each blade/slider block assembly may act as the moving part of a potentiometer. By measuring the electrical resistance between the blades, the position of all blades and hence the associated finger segments may be determined. All finger sideway motions may be detected by conventional potentiometers mounted at the pivoting points of the ExoPlates. -
FIGS. 7A and 7B illustrate an embodiment of a haptic apparatus in which a latch mechanism is used to restrict motion of a user's finger segment. In this embodiment, theblade 704 may be passively fixed onto the finger strap. The electric power may be transferred to the slider block 712 through twoconductive strips 740 attached to thenon-conductive blade 704. The power in theconductive strips 740 may be delivered by means ofbrushes 750 to an electro-magnetic coil 741, which may attract twometallic latches 742 simultaneously. Thelatches 742 may each drive apin 744 into apertures placed on theblade 704 and on theExoPlate 702, respectively. The pin motions may be independent of one another. If one pin does not line up with a hole, it may not restrict the motion of the other pin. - In the configuration illustrated in
FIGS. 7A and 7B , the slider block 712 can be pinned onto theExoPlate 702, and at the same time theblade 704 may be pinned onto the slider block 712 whenever the power is applied to the conductive strips 740. Compared to the rotating blade approach described above, the latch mechanism illustrated inFIGS. 7A and 7B may be built in miniature scale, because the power required is very small since only the small latches on the slider block need to be moved. - It may still be possible to generate and apply an independent proportional force for each finger segment, with the alternative latch mechanism described above. The electric wires connected to the
strips 740 at the base of theblade 704 may be in coil form, such as a telephone handset wire, to allow the rising of the blade end. - In sum, haptic apparatuses have been described that provide a user with a realistic feeling of grasp, and that are applicable to all finger segments and the palm, as opposed to being applicable to finger tips only. The haptic apparatuses described above may be capable of responding to gesture signals at relatively high frequencies, thereby providing an extremely realistic and dynamic sense of grasp. These haptic apparatus may have maximum numbers of pressure points for force feedback, and hence may provide force feedback to a large number of relevant pressure points, up to about fifteen. No unrealistic or unnecessary force may be exerted on unwanted areas on fingers. Force feedback may be bidirectional, i.e., force may be applied both under and above each finger segment. Also, the force feedback mechanism may be engaged at the hand area rather than at remote cable-connected locations that generally result in a sluggish and unrealistic sense of grasp, because of cable stretch and accumulation of various mechanical backlashes. These haptic apparatuses may perform gesture measurement without need for additional devices such as exoskeleton gloves, and therefore may be worn on the bare hand with minimal intrusive hardware. Finally, these haptic apparatuses may be manufactured at a relatively low cost.
- The previous description of the disclosed embodiments is provided to enable any person skilled in the art to make or use the present invention. Various modifications to these embodiments will be readily apparent to those skilled in the art, and the generic principles defined herein may be applied to other embodiments without departing from the spirit or scope of what is disclosed above. Thus, the apparatuses and methods described above are not intended to be limited to the embodiments shown herein, but are to be accorded the full scope consistent with the claims, wherein reference to an element in the singular is not intended to mean “one and only one” unless specifically so stated, but rather “one or more.”
- All structural and functional equivalents to the elements of the various embodiments described throughout this disclosure that are known or later come to be known to those of ordinary skill in the art are expressly incorporated herein by reference, and are intended to be encompassed by the claims. Moreover, nothing disclosed herein is intended to be dedicated to the public regardless of whether or not such disclosure is explicitly recited in the claims. No claim element is to be construed under the provisions of 35 U.S.C. §112, sixth paragraph, unless the element is expressly recited using the phrase “means for” or, in the case of a method claim, the element is recited using the phrase “step for.”
Claims (21)
Priority Applications (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US11/143,696 US7495654B2 (en) | 2004-06-04 | 2005-06-02 | Haptic apparatus |
PCT/US2005/019469 WO2005117766A2 (en) | 2004-06-04 | 2005-06-03 | Haptic apparatus |
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US57733004P | 2004-06-04 | 2004-06-04 | |
US11/143,696 US7495654B2 (en) | 2004-06-04 | 2005-06-02 | Haptic apparatus |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
US20060047342A1 true US20060047342A1 (en) | 2006-03-02 |
US7495654B2 US7495654B2 (en) | 2009-02-24 |
Family
ID=35463310
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US11/143,696 Expired - Fee Related US7495654B2 (en) | 2004-06-04 | 2005-06-02 | Haptic apparatus |
Country Status (2)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (1) | US7495654B2 (en) |
WO (1) | WO2005117766A2 (en) |
Cited By (4)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US8425528B2 (en) | 2008-12-19 | 2013-04-23 | Amicus Design Group, Llc | Insertion tool for inter-body vertebral prosthetic device with self-deploying screws |
US8685104B2 (en) | 2012-03-19 | 2014-04-01 | Amicus Design Group, Llc | Interbody vertebral prosthetic and orthopedic fusion device with self-deploying anchors |
US9566165B2 (en) | 2012-03-19 | 2017-02-14 | Amicus Design Group, Llc | Interbody vertebral prosthetic and orthopedic fusion device with self-deploying anchors |
US11285291B2 (en) * | 2018-03-23 | 2022-03-29 | Weart S.R.L. | Haptic ring |
Families Citing this family (6)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20080167662A1 (en) * | 2007-01-08 | 2008-07-10 | Kurtz Anthony D | Tactile feel apparatus for use with robotic operations |
US8028644B2 (en) * | 2007-12-04 | 2011-10-04 | Cybernet Systems Corporation | Cable driven tactor |
US10055022B2 (en) | 2017-01-11 | 2018-08-21 | International Business Machines Corporation | Simulating obstruction in a virtual environment |
US20190354183A1 (en) * | 2018-05-16 | 2019-11-21 | Immersion Corporation | Kinesthetic feedback to virtual and augmented reality controllers |
US10534433B1 (en) * | 2018-08-24 | 2020-01-14 | Facebook Technologies, Llc | Wearable haptic devices with jamming assemblies for haptic jamming |
WO2022219337A1 (en) * | 2021-04-13 | 2022-10-20 | Cambridge Mechatronics Limited | Haptic glove |
Citations (22)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US5166972A (en) * | 1988-11-15 | 1992-11-24 | Mitel Corporation | Group emergency call system |
US5354162A (en) * | 1991-02-26 | 1994-10-11 | Rutgers University | Actuator system for providing force feedback to portable master support |
US5516249A (en) * | 1994-05-10 | 1996-05-14 | Technical Research Associates, Inc. | Exoskeleton with kinesthetic feedback and robotic control |
US5583478A (en) * | 1995-03-01 | 1996-12-10 | Renzi; Ronald | Virtual environment tactile system |
US6059506A (en) * | 1990-02-02 | 2000-05-09 | Virtual Technologies, Inc. | Force feedback and texture simulating interface device |
US6121923A (en) * | 1999-02-19 | 2000-09-19 | Motorola, Inc. | Fixed site and satellite data-aided GPS signal acquisition method and system |
US20010020937A1 (en) * | 1995-01-18 | 2001-09-13 | Immersion Corporation | Computer interface apparatus including linkage having flex |
US6408289B1 (en) * | 1993-06-11 | 2002-06-18 | Mri Devices Daum Gmbh | Shapeable elastic body with master unit and method of controlling |
US6413229B1 (en) * | 1997-05-12 | 2002-07-02 | Virtual Technologies, Inc | Force-feedback interface device for the hand |
US20020113771A1 (en) * | 1995-06-09 | 2002-08-22 | Louis B. Rosenberg | Force feedback interface devices having finger receptacle and fluid- controlled forces |
US20020175901A1 (en) * | 2001-05-22 | 2002-11-28 | Gettemy Shawn R. | High transparency integrated enclosure touch screen assembly for a portable hand held device |
US20020191595A1 (en) * | 2001-06-18 | 2002-12-19 | Mar Jack K. | Providing communications capabilities to mobile devices at an enterprise |
US6497672B2 (en) * | 1997-10-24 | 2002-12-24 | Virtual Technologies, Inc. | Device and method for measuring the position of animate links |
US20030055410A1 (en) * | 1998-11-20 | 2003-03-20 | Intuitive Surgical, Inc. | Performing cardiac surgery without cardioplegia |
US6686911B1 (en) * | 1996-11-26 | 2004-02-03 | Immersion Corporation | Control knob with control modes and force feedback |
US20040047461A1 (en) * | 2002-09-10 | 2004-03-11 | Weisman Jordan Kent | Method and apparatus for improved conference call management |
US6912230B1 (en) * | 1999-02-05 | 2005-06-28 | Tecore | Multi-protocol wireless communication apparatus and method |
US20050232252A1 (en) * | 2004-03-01 | 2005-10-20 | Hoover Thomas R | Communication system with distributed intelligence |
US20050271029A1 (en) * | 2004-06-02 | 2005-12-08 | Frederick Iffland | Methods, apparatus and computer program products for testing a voice over Internet protocol communication system |
US6993355B1 (en) * | 2002-02-22 | 2006-01-31 | Verizon Services Corp. | Methods and apparatus for connecting family members |
US7138976B1 (en) * | 2000-07-13 | 2006-11-21 | Rutgers, The State University Of New Jersey | Hand force feedback and sensing system |
US20070003024A1 (en) * | 2005-06-22 | 2007-01-04 | Cml Emergency Services Inc. | Network emergency call taking system and method |
-
2005
- 2005-06-02 US US11/143,696 patent/US7495654B2/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
- 2005-06-03 WO PCT/US2005/019469 patent/WO2005117766A2/en active Application Filing
Patent Citations (22)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US5166972A (en) * | 1988-11-15 | 1992-11-24 | Mitel Corporation | Group emergency call system |
US6059506A (en) * | 1990-02-02 | 2000-05-09 | Virtual Technologies, Inc. | Force feedback and texture simulating interface device |
US5354162A (en) * | 1991-02-26 | 1994-10-11 | Rutgers University | Actuator system for providing force feedback to portable master support |
US6408289B1 (en) * | 1993-06-11 | 2002-06-18 | Mri Devices Daum Gmbh | Shapeable elastic body with master unit and method of controlling |
US5516249A (en) * | 1994-05-10 | 1996-05-14 | Technical Research Associates, Inc. | Exoskeleton with kinesthetic feedback and robotic control |
US20010020937A1 (en) * | 1995-01-18 | 2001-09-13 | Immersion Corporation | Computer interface apparatus including linkage having flex |
US5583478A (en) * | 1995-03-01 | 1996-12-10 | Renzi; Ronald | Virtual environment tactile system |
US20020113771A1 (en) * | 1995-06-09 | 2002-08-22 | Louis B. Rosenberg | Force feedback interface devices having finger receptacle and fluid- controlled forces |
US6686911B1 (en) * | 1996-11-26 | 2004-02-03 | Immersion Corporation | Control knob with control modes and force feedback |
US6413229B1 (en) * | 1997-05-12 | 2002-07-02 | Virtual Technologies, Inc | Force-feedback interface device for the hand |
US6497672B2 (en) * | 1997-10-24 | 2002-12-24 | Virtual Technologies, Inc. | Device and method for measuring the position of animate links |
US20030055410A1 (en) * | 1998-11-20 | 2003-03-20 | Intuitive Surgical, Inc. | Performing cardiac surgery without cardioplegia |
US6912230B1 (en) * | 1999-02-05 | 2005-06-28 | Tecore | Multi-protocol wireless communication apparatus and method |
US6121923A (en) * | 1999-02-19 | 2000-09-19 | Motorola, Inc. | Fixed site and satellite data-aided GPS signal acquisition method and system |
US7138976B1 (en) * | 2000-07-13 | 2006-11-21 | Rutgers, The State University Of New Jersey | Hand force feedback and sensing system |
US20020175901A1 (en) * | 2001-05-22 | 2002-11-28 | Gettemy Shawn R. | High transparency integrated enclosure touch screen assembly for a portable hand held device |
US20020191595A1 (en) * | 2001-06-18 | 2002-12-19 | Mar Jack K. | Providing communications capabilities to mobile devices at an enterprise |
US6993355B1 (en) * | 2002-02-22 | 2006-01-31 | Verizon Services Corp. | Methods and apparatus for connecting family members |
US20040047461A1 (en) * | 2002-09-10 | 2004-03-11 | Weisman Jordan Kent | Method and apparatus for improved conference call management |
US20050232252A1 (en) * | 2004-03-01 | 2005-10-20 | Hoover Thomas R | Communication system with distributed intelligence |
US20050271029A1 (en) * | 2004-06-02 | 2005-12-08 | Frederick Iffland | Methods, apparatus and computer program products for testing a voice over Internet protocol communication system |
US20070003024A1 (en) * | 2005-06-22 | 2007-01-04 | Cml Emergency Services Inc. | Network emergency call taking system and method |
Cited By (10)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US8425528B2 (en) | 2008-12-19 | 2013-04-23 | Amicus Design Group, Llc | Insertion tool for inter-body vertebral prosthetic device with self-deploying screws |
US8998920B2 (en) | 2008-12-19 | 2015-04-07 | Amicus Design Group, Llc | Insertion tool for inter-body vertebral prosthetic device with self-deploying screws |
US8685104B2 (en) | 2012-03-19 | 2014-04-01 | Amicus Design Group, Llc | Interbody vertebral prosthetic and orthopedic fusion device with self-deploying anchors |
US8906101B2 (en) | 2012-03-19 | 2014-12-09 | Amicus Design Group, Llc | Interbody vertebral prosthetic and orthopedic fusion device with self-deploying anchors |
US9107761B2 (en) | 2012-03-19 | 2015-08-18 | Amicus Design Group, Llc | Interbody vertebral prosthetic and orthopedic fusion device with self-deploying anchors |
US9283087B2 (en) | 2012-03-19 | 2016-03-15 | Amicus Design Group, Llc | Interbody vertebral prosthetic and orthopedic fusion device with self-deploying anchors |
US9566165B2 (en) | 2012-03-19 | 2017-02-14 | Amicus Design Group, Llc | Interbody vertebral prosthetic and orthopedic fusion device with self-deploying anchors |
US9757252B2 (en) | 2012-03-19 | 2017-09-12 | Amicus Design Group, Llc | Interbody vertebral prosthetic and orthopedic fusion device with self-deploying anchors |
US10058435B2 (en) | 2012-03-19 | 2018-08-28 | Amicus Design Group, Llc | Interbody vertebral prosthetic and orthopedic fusion device with self-deploying anchors |
US11285291B2 (en) * | 2018-03-23 | 2022-03-29 | Weart S.R.L. | Haptic ring |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
WO2005117766A2 (en) | 2005-12-15 |
WO2005117766A3 (en) | 2007-11-22 |
US7495654B2 (en) | 2009-02-24 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US7495654B2 (en) | Haptic apparatus | |
CN105437267B (en) | Adjustable spacer comb, adjustable driver and hair cutting appliance | |
JP7265567B2 (en) | Finger-worn device using sensor and tactile sense | |
US20230240775A1 (en) | Actuated grips for controller | |
KR100252706B1 (en) | Force feedback and textures simulating interface device | |
EP2722836B1 (en) | Optical sensor device and image display device | |
US5923318A (en) | Finger manipulatable 6 degree-of-freedom input device | |
TW201135567A (en) | Touch pad with force sensors and actuator feedback | |
US10882191B2 (en) | Robotic system with haptic cutting tool | |
JP2004358634A (en) | Soft finger with built-in tactile sensor | |
WO2008023705A1 (en) | Electric pruning shears | |
WO2021095493A1 (en) | Control device, haptic display device, and control method | |
KR20100134983A (en) | The wearable robot for hand motion of disabled people | |
US20190358811A1 (en) | Control Apparatus And Robot System | |
US6433778B1 (en) | Finger operating apparatus, and arm operating apparatus using the finger operating apparatus | |
CN1176448C (en) | Analog scalpel unit | |
KR101853706B1 (en) | finger ring type sensing device having the middle between finger nodes | |
CN218052644U (en) | Wearable control glove for controlling mechanical hand | |
KR101522775B1 (en) | Tactile Sensing Device | |
JP7301369B2 (en) | Assist force imparting tool, scissors, shearing tool | |
KR102550237B1 (en) | Touch pad based bending sensor apparatus and robot hand control method for grasping gesture using the same | |
KR20190021717A (en) | Adjustable robot gripper without hinge | |
Miyama et al. | Design of a Five-Fingered Hand with Full-Fingered Tactile Sensors Using Conductive Filaments and Its Application to Bending after Insertion Motion | |
CN116712179A (en) | Operating handle and surgical robot | |
CN2536192Y (en) | Invented operation knife devices |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA, CALIFORNIA Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:KHOSHNEVIS, BEHROKH;REEL/FRAME:016440/0015 Effective date: 20050810 |
|
STCF | Information on status: patent grant |
Free format text: PATENTED CASE |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION, VIRGINIA Free format text: CONFIRMATORY LICENSE;ASSIGNOR:UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA;REEL/FRAME:023015/0946 Effective date: 20090331 |
|
FPAY | Fee payment |
Year of fee payment: 4 |
|
REMI | Maintenance fee reminder mailed | ||
FPAY | Fee payment |
Year of fee payment: 8 |
|
SULP | Surcharge for late payment |
Year of fee payment: 7 |
|
FEPP | Fee payment procedure |
Free format text: MAINTENANCE FEE REMINDER MAILED (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: REM.); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: SMALL ENTITY |
|
LAPS | Lapse for failure to pay maintenance fees |
Free format text: PATENT EXPIRED FOR FAILURE TO PAY MAINTENANCE FEES (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: EXP.); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: SMALL ENTITY |
|
STCH | Information on status: patent discontinuation |
Free format text: PATENT EXPIRED DUE TO NONPAYMENT OF MAINTENANCE FEES UNDER 37 CFR 1.362 |
|
FP | Lapsed due to failure to pay maintenance fee |
Effective date: 20210224 |