US20060047342A1 - Haptic apparatus - Google Patents

Haptic apparatus Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US20060047342A1
US20060047342A1 US11/143,696 US14369605A US2006047342A1 US 20060047342 A1 US20060047342 A1 US 20060047342A1 US 14369605 A US14369605 A US 14369605A US 2006047342 A1 US2006047342 A1 US 2006047342A1
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
anatomical segment
segment
motion
anatomical
elongate member
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
US11/143,696
Other versions
US7495654B2 (en
Inventor
Behrokh Khoshnevis
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
University of Southern California USC
Original Assignee
University of Southern California USC
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by University of Southern California USC filed Critical University of Southern California USC
Priority to US11/143,696 priority Critical patent/US7495654B2/en
Priority to PCT/US2005/019469 priority patent/WO2005117766A2/en
Assigned to UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA reassignment UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: KHOSHNEVIS, BEHROKH
Publication of US20060047342A1 publication Critical patent/US20060047342A1/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of US7495654B2 publication Critical patent/US7495654B2/en
Assigned to NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION reassignment NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION CONFIRMATORY LICENSE (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA
Expired - Fee Related legal-status Critical Current
Adjusted expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06FELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F3/00Input arrangements for transferring data to be processed into a form capable of being handled by the computer; Output arrangements for transferring data from processing unit to output unit, e.g. interface arrangements
    • G06F3/01Input arrangements or combined input and output arrangements for interaction between user and computer
    • G06F3/011Arrangements for interaction with the human body, e.g. for user immersion in virtual reality
    • G06F3/014Hand-worn input/output arrangements, e.g. data gloves

Definitions

  • Some haptic devices may be capable of providing force feedback to all five fingers.
  • an exoskeleton may be worn over a glove, which may provide measurement information about hand gestures, through several embedded sensors that register the motion at various joints.
  • a host computer may recognize the position of the hand and fingers with respect to a virtual object being approached.
  • the computer may perform collision detection, and send resulting forces to a force control unit that may have a servomotor for each finger.
  • a sheathed cable may connect the finger tip through cable guide bridges to a pulley mounted on a motor shaft.
  • the motor rotation may be controlled by setting the effective cable length to be such that the finger is stopped when its virtual counterpart touches the virtual object.
  • haptic devices may be quite costly, and may suffer from system complexity. Users of these haptic devices may be inconvenienced by the requirement of an additional sensor glove. The mechanical bandwidth of these devices may be quite low, resulting in an unrealistic feeling of grasp. Forces may be unrealistically exerted on the back of the fingers and hand as well, when a virtual object is held, due to cable guide bridges mounted on the back of fingers. Also, these haptic devices may provide force feedback on finger tips only, so that holding a ball may give the same feeling as holding a disk, for instance. This may limit their applicability.
  • a haptic apparatus may include a plate element positionable to extend over an anatomical segment of a user, and an elongate member coupled to the plate element and configured to be movably mounted onto the anatomical segment so as to remain substantially vertical and substantially perpendicular to the anatomical segment while the anatomical segment undergoes a motion.
  • the haptic apparatus may further include a motion restrictor responsive to a control signal to impede the motion of the anatomical segment by generating an opposing force along the elongate member in a direction normal to the anatomical segment, thereby providing tactile feedback to the user.
  • a haptic apparatus may include a plurality of assemblies.
  • Each assembly may include an exoskeleton plate positionable so as to extend over an anatomical segment of a user, and an elongate member coupled to the exoskeleton plate and configured to be movably mounted onto the anatomical segment so as to remain substantially vertical and substantially perpendicular to the anatomical segment while the anatomical segment undergoes a motion.
  • Each assembly may further include a motion restrictor responsive to a control signal to impede the motion of the anatomical segment by generating an opposing feedback force along the elongate member in a direction normal to the anatomical segment, thereby providing tactile feedback to the user.
  • a haptic apparatus may include an exoskeleton plate positionable so as to extend over an anatomical segment of a user, and an elongate member coupled to the exoskeleton plate and configured to be movably mounted onto the anatomical segment so as to remain substantially perpendicular to the anatomical segment while the anatomical segment undergoes a motion.
  • the haptic apparatus may further include force feedback means responsive to a control signal for impeding the motion of the anatomical segment by generating an opposing feedback force along the elongate member in a direction normal to the anatomical segment, thereby providing tactile feedback to the user.
  • a method may include movably mounting an elongate member to an anatomical segment of a user so that the elongate member remains substantially vertical and perpendicular to the anatomical segment while the anatomical segment undergoes a motion.
  • the method may further include sensing a change in the position of the anatomical segment with respect to a virtual object during the motion, and, upon detection of an imminent collision between the anatomical segment and the virtual object, impeding further motion of the anatomical segment by generating an opposing force along the elongate member in a direction normal to the anatomical segment, thereby providing tactile feedback to the user.
  • FIG. 1 schematically illustrates reaction forces that may be generated when objects are grasped by a user's hand and fingers.
  • FIG. 2 illustrates a haptic apparatus including an exoskeleton plate and a toothed blade mounted on a single finger segment.
  • FIGS. 3A and 3B illustrate a haptic apparatus in which a plurality of assemblies are mounted on a corresponding plurality of fingers.
  • FIGS. 4A, 4B , and 4 C illustrate different ways in which a toothed blade may become engaged onto an edge of the exoskeleton plate.
  • FIGS. 5A, 5B , and 5 C illustrate embodiments in which a sheathed cable with a shaped memory wire core may be used to rotate the toothed blade.
  • FIG. 6 illustrates an embodiment of a haptic apparatus that can provide tactile feedback without using a position sensing glove.
  • FIGS. 7A and 7B illustrate an embodiment of a haptic apparatus in which a latch mechanism is used to restrict motion of a user's finger segment.
  • Haptic apparatuses may implement full-hand haptic grasp systems. These systems may provide users with a realistic feeling of grasp, applicable to all finger segments (e.g. phalanges) as well as to the palm of the hand, as opposed to finger tips only.
  • FIG. 1 schematically illustrates resistive or opposing forces that may be generated when objects are grasped by a user's hand and fingers.
  • numerous segments under the hand and different finger segments may be involve when different objects, such as the illustrated spherical ball 102 and disk 104 .
  • the reaction forces exerted on the finger and hand segments are generally in a direction perpendicular to the contact point between the segments and the object.
  • FIG. 2 illustrates a haptic apparatus 200 mounted on a single finger segment of a user.
  • the haptic apparatus 200 includes a plate element 202 ; an elongate member 204 coupled to the plate element 202 ; and a motion restrictor 206 .
  • the plate element 202 may be positioned to extend above the finger 208 of the user.
  • the plate element 202 may be an exoskeleton plate (henceforth referred to as “ExoPlate”).
  • the elongate member 204 can be rotatably (or otherwise movably) mounted onto the finger segment in a way that it always stays substantially vertical and substantially perpendicular to the finger segment, as the finger segment moves.
  • the motion restrictor 206 may be configured to impede further motion of finger segment, for example in response to a control signal from a controller (not shown) that detects one or more collisions between a virtual object and a virtual counterpart of the finger segment.
  • the motion restrictor 206 may impede the motion of the finger segment by generating an opposing feedback force along the vertical member 204 in a direction normal to the finger segment, thereby providing tactile feedback to the user.
  • the elongate member may be a straight toothed blade 204 which can be rotated on demand by 90 degrees.
  • the apparatus 200 may accomplish feedback force generation by activating rotation of the blade 204 .
  • Such a rotation engages the teeth of the blade 204 in the protruded edge 203 of the ExoPlate 202 , which extends above a finger.
  • the ExoPlate 202 may be made of a solid and light thin sheet of strong material such as carbon composite, or preferably a transparent material such as polycarbonate. Use of transparent material eases the wearing of the device as the ExoPlate 202 would not obstruct the view of the fingers not directly in the line of sight.
  • the motion restrictor may be a rotation actuator 206 which is strapped over the finger segment.
  • the lower end of the toothed blade 204 may be attached to the rotation actuator 206 .
  • the opposing force generated by such rotation and engagement may be a bidirectional force, i.e. may include both an upward component and a downward component along the blade 204 .
  • the blade rotation may be activated by transmission of a control signal from the controller.
  • the controller may sense the motion of the finger segment, and monitor the relative position of a virtual counterpart of the finger segment with respect to a virtual object.
  • the controller may generate the control signal once the virtual object collides with the associated virtual finger segment.
  • one or more position sensors may detect the position and motion of the finger segment, and transmit information relating to the detected position and motion to the controller, which may generate the control signal when it detects a collision between the virtual counterpart of the finger segment and the virtual object.
  • the resulting rotation of the blade 204 may be immediate, and may be accomplished by various actuation components such a rotary solenoid or a small electric motor.
  • the electric motor at 90 degree end of range points may run into mechanical stops and stalls, and a return may be made possible by a spiral spring or reverse current.
  • the actuation of rotation and force feedback generation is shown for one finger segment only, and as being applied to the finger tip.
  • the apparatus 200 does not exert any fictitious pressure on the back of the finger.
  • Each ExoPlate 202 may pivot sideways, following the sideway motion of the associated finger. Such sideways pivoting may be accomplished by attachment of simple small solid sheets (not shown) to the base of the ExoPlates 202 .
  • the small sheet elements may extend on each side of the finger, and may transfer the sideway motion of the finger to the ExoPlate 202 .
  • Each ExoPlate 202 may also optionally pivot toward the palm of the hand. This motion may be restricted by a servo motor (not shown), either remotely or by locally pulling and releasing a restraining cable 209 . This optional pivoting action can be used to provide a proportional force feedback for grasping elastic objects such as a sponge ball.
  • a slider block 212 may be used.
  • the slider block 212 may move along the edge of the ExoPlate 202 while always engaged in a groove 211 on the plate 202 , the groove 211 serving as a guideway.
  • the side surfaces on the opening on the slider block 212 through which the blade 204 traverses may be rounded. This may allow the blade 204 to move freely, without getting its teeth stuck in sharp edge on the block 212 .
  • haptic apparatus 200 is described as being mounted on a finger segment, in principle it may be mounted on any other anatomical segment of the user.
  • each blade assembly may be independently used for each finger segment may allow for control of every finger segment without mechanical complication.
  • control of more than one finger segment may not be possible because of the dependencies of motion of each finger segment, and the resulting mechanical intractability.
  • FIGS. 3A and 3B illustrate a haptic apparatus 300 in which a plurality of blade-ExoPlate assemblies are mounted on a corresponding plurality of fingers.
  • Each blade 304 in the apparatus 300 may always be substantially perpendicular to its associated finger segment, and hence when it becomes engaged to an edge 303 of an ExoPlate 302 , it may apply a force which is in the direction of the normal to the finger segment.
  • FIGS. 4A, 4B , and 4 C illustrate different ways in which a toothed blade 404 may become engaged onto an edge 403 of the exoskeleton plate 402 .
  • the ExoPlate is made of wearable materials such as plastics (e.g., polycarbonate), it may not be desirable to engage the blade teeth with the ExoPlate, as the plate edge may be damages and wear out over time.
  • the blade teeth may become engaged in a small hard metal edge 405 installed in the slider block 412 .
  • the blade 404 may not, in certain positions, be perpendicular to the inner edge of the ExoPlate 402 . In these cases, even though the blade 404 may get locked to the slider block 412 upon rotation, it may unwontedly pull and slip the slider block 412 along its guide. This slippage may be undesirable, because it may not allow the locking of the finger segment at the desired position.
  • a metallic piece with two sharp edges may be used which upon pull-down by the blade 404 may touch the inner surface of the ExoPlate guide groove, acting as a break mechanism. To keep these sharp edges away during free slide an elastic spring component (indicated with reference numerals 407 in FIGS. 4A and 4C ) may be used.
  • the toothed blade 404 may be also rotated remotely by means of a sheathed cable which may be pulled at a remote location by a linear solenoid.
  • the finger end of the cable may in turn rotate a pulley around which the cable core is wound.
  • a spring may return the pulley upon solenoid release.
  • a sheathed cable with a Shaped Memory Wire (henceforth referred to as “SMW”) core may be used, as shown in FIGS. 5A, 5B , and 5 C.
  • a sheathed cable 520 with a shaped memory wire core 522 are used to rotate the toothed blade 504 .
  • the wire end may be attached to the base of the toothed blade.
  • An SMW may have many properties. One property may be that an SMW may return to a given length after it is heated, usually through passage of an electric current. Another property may be that an SMW typically does not easily buckle or bend, and when one end of a SMW is rotated, the torsion may be transferred along the length of the wire, even if the wire has many twists and turns.
  • SMWs may be useful in the embodiments illustrated in FIGS. 5A, 5B , and 5 C.
  • the SMW wire 522 may be bent by passage through the angle tube at the finger side, and as it emerges it may stay straight and hence perpendicular to the associated finger segment.
  • the SMW wire 522 may be rotated remotely by a rotary solenoid, and the rotation action may be transferred to the finger side. When attached to the toothed blade, the wire rotation may in turn rotate the blade.
  • Mechanical stops may be used at the finger side and a rotation of more than 90 degrees may be applied to compensate for possible wire torsions.
  • a servo motor 530 may be attached to each wire end to provide “independent” proportional force feed back to each segment of the finger.
  • the wire may be wound around the servo motor pulley which provides it with reciprocal movement, while the rotary solenoid may apply rotation by means of a rod with a square cross section.
  • a realistic feeling of grasp of objects made of several materials with various elasticity property e.g., a screw driver with a soft rubber handle coating
  • FIG. 6 illustrates an embodiment of a haptic apparatus 600 that can provide tactile feedback without using a position sensing glove.
  • the glove may be avoided if a strip of material with electrical resistance is places along the edge of the ExoPlate 602 where it would come in contact with brushes attached to the slider block 612 .
  • each blade/slider block assembly may act as the moving part of a potentiometer. By measuring the electrical resistance between the blades, the position of all blades and hence the associated finger segments may be determined. All finger sideway motions may be detected by conventional potentiometers mounted at the pivoting points of the ExoPlates.
  • FIGS. 7A and 7B illustrate an embodiment of a haptic apparatus in which a latch mechanism is used to restrict motion of a user's finger segment.
  • the blade 704 may be passively fixed onto the finger strap.
  • the electric power may be transferred to the slider block 712 through two conductive strips 740 attached to the non-conductive blade 704 .
  • the power in the conductive strips 740 may be delivered by means of brushes 750 to an electro-magnetic coil 741 , which may attract two metallic latches 742 simultaneously.
  • the latches 742 may each drive a pin 744 into apertures placed on the blade 704 and on the ExoPlate 702 , respectively.
  • the pin motions may be independent of one another. If one pin does not line up with a hole, it may not restrict the motion of the other pin.
  • the slider block 712 can be pinned onto the ExoPlate 702 , and at the same time the blade 704 may be pinned onto the slider block 712 whenever the power is applied to the conductive strips 740 .
  • the latch mechanism illustrated in FIGS. 7A and 7B may be built in miniature scale, because the power required is very small since only the small latches on the slider block need to be moved.
  • the electric wires connected to the strips 740 at the base of the blade 704 may be in coil form, such as a telephone handset wire, to allow the rising of the blade end.
  • haptic apparatuses have been described that provide a user with a realistic feeling of grasp, and that are applicable to all finger segments and the palm, as opposed to being applicable to finger tips only.
  • the haptic apparatuses described above may be capable of responding to gesture signals at relatively high frequencies, thereby providing an extremely realistic and dynamic sense of grasp.
  • These haptic apparatus may have maximum numbers of pressure points for force feedback, and hence may provide force feedback to a large number of relevant pressure points, up to about fifteen. No unrealistic or unnecessary force may be exerted on unwanted areas on fingers.
  • Force feedback may be bidirectional, i.e., force may be applied both under and above each finger segment.
  • the force feedback mechanism may be engaged at the hand area rather than at remote cable-connected locations that generally result in a sluggish and unrealistic sense of grasp, because of cable stretch and accumulation of various mechanical backlashes.
  • These haptic apparatuses may perform gesture measurement without need for additional devices such as exoskeleton gloves, and therefore may be worn on the bare hand with minimal intrusive hardware.
  • these haptic apparatuses may be manufactured at a relatively low cost.

Abstract

A haptic apparatus may include a plate element positionable to extend over an anatomical segment of a user, and an elongate member coupled to the plate element and configured to be movably mounted onto the anatomical segment so as to remain substantially vertical and substantially perpendicular to the anatomical segment while the anatomical segment undergoes a motion. The haptic apparatus may further include a motion restrictor responsive to a control signal to impede the motion of the anatomical segment by generating an opposing force along the elongate member in a direction normal to the anatomical segment, thereby providing tactile feedback to the user.

Description

    CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS
  • This application claims the benefit of priority under 35 U.S.C. § 119(e) from U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 60/577,330 entitled “OmniGrasp—A Full-Hand Cyber Grasp System” and filed on Jun. 4, 2004, by inventor Behrokh Khoshnevis, attorney docket no. 28080-137. Provisional application Ser. No. 60/577,330 is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
  • STATEMENT REGARDING FEDERALLY SPONSORED RESEARCH
  • This work was funded in part by NSF Grant No. ERC-EEC-9529152. The government may have certain rights in the invention.
  • BACKGROUND
  • There may be numerous applications for a force feedback interface in dexterous task simulations, in which it may be desirable to control forces on independent fingers. A number of haptic devices have been devised that attempt to create the feeling of grasping an object by fingers and hand.
  • Some haptic devices may be capable of providing force feedback to all five fingers. For example, an exoskeleton may be worn over a glove, which may provide measurement information about hand gestures, through several embedded sensors that register the motion at various joints. A host computer may recognize the position of the hand and fingers with respect to a virtual object being approached. The computer may perform collision detection, and send resulting forces to a force control unit that may have a servomotor for each finger. For each finger, a sheathed cable may connect the finger tip through cable guide bridges to a pulley mounted on a motor shaft. The motor rotation may be controlled by setting the effective cable length to be such that the finger is stopped when its virtual counterpart touches the virtual object.
  • These haptic devices may be quite costly, and may suffer from system complexity. Users of these haptic devices may be inconvenienced by the requirement of an additional sensor glove. The mechanical bandwidth of these devices may be quite low, resulting in an unrealistic feeling of grasp. Forces may be unrealistically exerted on the back of the fingers and hand as well, when a virtual object is held, due to cable guide bridges mounted on the back of fingers. Also, these haptic devices may provide force feedback on finger tips only, so that holding a ball may give the same feeling as holding a disk, for instance. This may limit their applicability.
  • SUMMARY
  • A haptic apparatus may include a plate element positionable to extend over an anatomical segment of a user, and an elongate member coupled to the plate element and configured to be movably mounted onto the anatomical segment so as to remain substantially vertical and substantially perpendicular to the anatomical segment while the anatomical segment undergoes a motion. The haptic apparatus may further include a motion restrictor responsive to a control signal to impede the motion of the anatomical segment by generating an opposing force along the elongate member in a direction normal to the anatomical segment, thereby providing tactile feedback to the user.
  • A haptic apparatus may include a plurality of assemblies. Each assembly may include an exoskeleton plate positionable so as to extend over an anatomical segment of a user, and an elongate member coupled to the exoskeleton plate and configured to be movably mounted onto the anatomical segment so as to remain substantially vertical and substantially perpendicular to the anatomical segment while the anatomical segment undergoes a motion. Each assembly may further include a motion restrictor responsive to a control signal to impede the motion of the anatomical segment by generating an opposing feedback force along the elongate member in a direction normal to the anatomical segment, thereby providing tactile feedback to the user.
  • A haptic apparatus may include an exoskeleton plate positionable so as to extend over an anatomical segment of a user, and an elongate member coupled to the exoskeleton plate and configured to be movably mounted onto the anatomical segment so as to remain substantially perpendicular to the anatomical segment while the anatomical segment undergoes a motion. The haptic apparatus may further include force feedback means responsive to a control signal for impeding the motion of the anatomical segment by generating an opposing feedback force along the elongate member in a direction normal to the anatomical segment, thereby providing tactile feedback to the user.
  • A method may include movably mounting an elongate member to an anatomical segment of a user so that the elongate member remains substantially vertical and perpendicular to the anatomical segment while the anatomical segment undergoes a motion. The method may further include sensing a change in the position of the anatomical segment with respect to a virtual object during the motion, and, upon detection of an imminent collision between the anatomical segment and the virtual object, impeding further motion of the anatomical segment by generating an opposing force along the elongate member in a direction normal to the anatomical segment, thereby providing tactile feedback to the user.
  • BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
  • FIG. 1 schematically illustrates reaction forces that may be generated when objects are grasped by a user's hand and fingers.
  • FIG. 2 illustrates a haptic apparatus including an exoskeleton plate and a toothed blade mounted on a single finger segment.
  • FIGS. 3A and 3B illustrate a haptic apparatus in which a plurality of assemblies are mounted on a corresponding plurality of fingers.
  • FIGS. 4A, 4B, and 4C illustrate different ways in which a toothed blade may become engaged onto an edge of the exoskeleton plate.
  • FIGS. 5A, 5B, and 5C illustrate embodiments in which a sheathed cable with a shaped memory wire core may be used to rotate the toothed blade.
  • FIG. 6 illustrates an embodiment of a haptic apparatus that can provide tactile feedback without using a position sensing glove.
  • FIGS. 7A and 7B illustrate an embodiment of a haptic apparatus in which a latch mechanism is used to restrict motion of a user's finger segment.
  • DETAILED DESCRIPTION
  • Haptic apparatuses are described that may implement full-hand haptic grasp systems. These systems may provide users with a realistic feeling of grasp, applicable to all finger segments (e.g. phalanges) as well as to the palm of the hand, as opposed to finger tips only.
  • FIG. 1 schematically illustrates resistive or opposing forces that may be generated when objects are grasped by a user's hand and fingers. As seen from FIG. 1, numerous segments under the hand and different finger segments may be involve when different objects, such as the illustrated spherical ball 102 and disk 104. As shown by the arrows in FIG. 1, the reaction forces exerted on the finger and hand segments are generally in a direction perpendicular to the contact point between the segments and the object.
  • FIG. 2 illustrates a haptic apparatus 200 mounted on a single finger segment of a user. In overview, the haptic apparatus 200 includes a plate element 202; an elongate member 204 coupled to the plate element 202; and a motion restrictor 206. The plate element 202 may be positioned to extend above the finger 208 of the user. The plate element 202 may be an exoskeleton plate (henceforth referred to as “ExoPlate”). The elongate member 204 can be rotatably (or otherwise movably) mounted onto the finger segment in a way that it always stays substantially vertical and substantially perpendicular to the finger segment, as the finger segment moves.
  • The motion restrictor 206 may be configured to impede further motion of finger segment, for example in response to a control signal from a controller (not shown) that detects one or more collisions between a virtual object and a virtual counterpart of the finger segment. The motion restrictor 206 may impede the motion of the finger segment by generating an opposing feedback force along the vertical member 204 in a direction normal to the finger segment, thereby providing tactile feedback to the user.
  • In the illustrated embodiment, the elongate member may be a straight toothed blade 204 which can be rotated on demand by 90 degrees. The apparatus 200 may accomplish feedback force generation by activating rotation of the blade 204. Such a rotation engages the teeth of the blade 204 in the protruded edge 203 of the ExoPlate 202, which extends above a finger. The ExoPlate 202 may be made of a solid and light thin sheet of strong material such as carbon composite, or preferably a transparent material such as polycarbonate. Use of transparent material eases the wearing of the device as the ExoPlate 202 would not obstruct the view of the fingers not directly in the line of sight.
  • In this embodiment, the motion restrictor may be a rotation actuator 206 which is strapped over the finger segment. The lower end of the toothed blade 204 may be attached to the rotation actuator 206. When the blade 204 becomes engaged in the protruded lower edge 203 of the ExoPlate 202, it may stop the motion of the associated finger segment along the length of the blade 204. The opposing force generated by such rotation and engagement may be a bidirectional force, i.e. may include both an upward component and a downward component along the blade 204.
  • The blade rotation may be activated by transmission of a control signal from the controller. The controller may sense the motion of the finger segment, and monitor the relative position of a virtual counterpart of the finger segment with respect to a virtual object. The controller may generate the control signal once the virtual object collides with the associated virtual finger segment. Alternatively, one or more position sensors (not shown) may detect the position and motion of the finger segment, and transmit information relating to the detected position and motion to the controller, which may generate the control signal when it detects a collision between the virtual counterpart of the finger segment and the virtual object.
  • The resulting rotation of the blade 204 may be immediate, and may be accomplished by various actuation components such a rotary solenoid or a small electric motor. The electric motor at 90 degree end of range points may run into mechanical stops and stalls, and a return may be made possible by a spiral spring or reverse current.
  • In the embodiment illustrated in FIG. 2, the actuation of rotation and force feedback generation is shown for one finger segment only, and as being applied to the finger tip. The apparatus 200 does not exert any fictitious pressure on the back of the finger.
  • Each ExoPlate 202 may pivot sideways, following the sideway motion of the associated finger. Such sideways pivoting may be accomplished by attachment of simple small solid sheets (not shown) to the base of the ExoPlates 202. The small sheet elements may extend on each side of the finger, and may transfer the sideway motion of the finger to the ExoPlate 202.
  • Each ExoPlate 202 may also optionally pivot toward the palm of the hand. This motion may be restricted by a servo motor (not shown), either remotely or by locally pulling and releasing a restraining cable 209. This optional pivoting action can be used to provide a proportional force feedback for grasping elastic objects such as a sponge ball.
  • To keep the blade in close vicinity of the protruded edge of the ExoPlate 202, a slider block 212 may be used. The slider block 212 may move along the edge of the ExoPlate 202 while always engaged in a groove 211 on the plate 202, the groove 211 serving as a guideway. The side surfaces on the opening on the slider block 212 through which the blade 204 traverses may be rounded. This may allow the blade 204 to move freely, without getting its teeth stuck in sharp edge on the block 212.
  • While the haptic apparatus 200 is described as being mounted on a finger segment, in principle it may be mounted on any other anatomical segment of the user.
  • A configuration in which each blade assembly may be independently used for each finger segment may allow for control of every finger segment without mechanical complication. In cable based designs, on the other hand, control of more than one finger segment may not be possible because of the dependencies of motion of each finger segment, and the resulting mechanical intractability.
  • FIGS. 3A and 3B illustrate a haptic apparatus 300 in which a plurality of blade-ExoPlate assemblies are mounted on a corresponding plurality of fingers. Each blade 304 in the apparatus 300 may always be substantially perpendicular to its associated finger segment, and hence when it becomes engaged to an edge 303 of an ExoPlate 302, it may apply a force which is in the direction of the normal to the finger segment.
  • FIGS. 4A, 4B, and 4C illustrate different ways in which a toothed blade 404 may become engaged onto an edge 403 of the exoskeleton plate 402. If the ExoPlate is made of wearable materials such as plastics (e.g., polycarbonate), it may not be desirable to engage the blade teeth with the ExoPlate, as the plate edge may be damages and wear out over time. In the embodiment illustrated in FIG. 4A, the blade teeth may become engaged in a small hard metal edge 405 installed in the slider block 412.
  • In the embodiments illustrated in FIGS. 4B and 4C, the blade 404 may not, in certain positions, be perpendicular to the inner edge of the ExoPlate 402. In these cases, even though the blade 404 may get locked to the slider block 412 upon rotation, it may unwontedly pull and slip the slider block 412 along its guide. This slippage may be undesirable, because it may not allow the locking of the finger segment at the desired position. To remedy this situation, a metallic piece with two sharp edges may be used which upon pull-down by the blade 404 may touch the inner surface of the ExoPlate guide groove, acting as a break mechanism. To keep these sharp edges away during free slide an elastic spring component (indicated with reference numerals 407 in FIGS. 4A and 4C) may be used.
  • The toothed blade 404 may be also rotated remotely by means of a sheathed cable which may be pulled at a remote location by a linear solenoid. The finger end of the cable may in turn rotate a pulley around which the cable core is wound. A spring may return the pulley upon solenoid release.
  • Alternatively, a sheathed cable with a Shaped Memory Wire (henceforth referred to as “SMW”) core may be used, as shown in FIGS. 5A, 5B, and 5C. In these embodiments, a sheathed cable 520 with a shaped memory wire core 522 are used to rotate the toothed blade 504. The wire end may be attached to the base of the toothed blade.
  • An SMW may have many properties. One property may be that an SMW may return to a given length after it is heated, usually through passage of an electric current. Another property may be that an SMW typically does not easily buckle or bend, and when one end of a SMW is rotated, the torsion may be transferred along the length of the wire, even if the wire has many twists and turns.
  • The latter property of SMWs may be useful in the embodiments illustrated in FIGS. 5A, 5B, and 5C. In these embodiments the SMW wire 522 may be bent by passage through the angle tube at the finger side, and as it emerges it may stay straight and hence perpendicular to the associated finger segment. Also, the SMW wire 522 may be rotated remotely by a rotary solenoid, and the rotation action may be transferred to the finger side. When attached to the toothed blade, the wire rotation may in turn rotate the blade. Mechanical stops may be used at the finger side and a rotation of more than 90 degrees may be applied to compensate for possible wire torsions.
  • A servo motor 530 may be attached to each wire end to provide “independent” proportional force feed back to each segment of the finger. The wire may be wound around the servo motor pulley which provides it with reciprocal movement, while the rotary solenoid may apply rotation by means of a rod with a square cross section. A realistic feeling of grasp of objects made of several materials with various elasticity property (e.g., a screw driver with a soft rubber handle coating) may be made possible, in this configuration.
  • The haptic apparatus described above may or may not be used with a position sensing glove. FIG. 6 illustrates an embodiment of a haptic apparatus 600 that can provide tactile feedback without using a position sensing glove. The glove may be avoided if a strip of material with electrical resistance is places along the edge of the ExoPlate 602 where it would come in contact with brushes attached to the slider block 612. If the toothed blades 604 are made out of metal, each blade/slider block assembly may act as the moving part of a potentiometer. By measuring the electrical resistance between the blades, the position of all blades and hence the associated finger segments may be determined. All finger sideway motions may be detected by conventional potentiometers mounted at the pivoting points of the ExoPlates.
  • FIGS. 7A and 7B illustrate an embodiment of a haptic apparatus in which a latch mechanism is used to restrict motion of a user's finger segment. In this embodiment, the blade 704 may be passively fixed onto the finger strap. The electric power may be transferred to the slider block 712 through two conductive strips 740 attached to the non-conductive blade 704. The power in the conductive strips 740 may be delivered by means of brushes 750 to an electro-magnetic coil 741, which may attract two metallic latches 742 simultaneously. The latches 742 may each drive a pin 744 into apertures placed on the blade 704 and on the ExoPlate 702, respectively. The pin motions may be independent of one another. If one pin does not line up with a hole, it may not restrict the motion of the other pin.
  • In the configuration illustrated in FIGS. 7A and 7B, the slider block 712 can be pinned onto the ExoPlate 702, and at the same time the blade 704 may be pinned onto the slider block 712 whenever the power is applied to the conductive strips 740. Compared to the rotating blade approach described above, the latch mechanism illustrated in FIGS. 7A and 7B may be built in miniature scale, because the power required is very small since only the small latches on the slider block need to be moved.
  • It may still be possible to generate and apply an independent proportional force for each finger segment, with the alternative latch mechanism described above. The electric wires connected to the strips 740 at the base of the blade 704 may be in coil form, such as a telephone handset wire, to allow the rising of the blade end.
  • In sum, haptic apparatuses have been described that provide a user with a realistic feeling of grasp, and that are applicable to all finger segments and the palm, as opposed to being applicable to finger tips only. The haptic apparatuses described above may be capable of responding to gesture signals at relatively high frequencies, thereby providing an extremely realistic and dynamic sense of grasp. These haptic apparatus may have maximum numbers of pressure points for force feedback, and hence may provide force feedback to a large number of relevant pressure points, up to about fifteen. No unrealistic or unnecessary force may be exerted on unwanted areas on fingers. Force feedback may be bidirectional, i.e., force may be applied both under and above each finger segment. Also, the force feedback mechanism may be engaged at the hand area rather than at remote cable-connected locations that generally result in a sluggish and unrealistic sense of grasp, because of cable stretch and accumulation of various mechanical backlashes. These haptic apparatuses may perform gesture measurement without need for additional devices such as exoskeleton gloves, and therefore may be worn on the bare hand with minimal intrusive hardware. Finally, these haptic apparatuses may be manufactured at a relatively low cost.
  • The previous description of the disclosed embodiments is provided to enable any person skilled in the art to make or use the present invention. Various modifications to these embodiments will be readily apparent to those skilled in the art, and the generic principles defined herein may be applied to other embodiments without departing from the spirit or scope of what is disclosed above. Thus, the apparatuses and methods described above are not intended to be limited to the embodiments shown herein, but are to be accorded the full scope consistent with the claims, wherein reference to an element in the singular is not intended to mean “one and only one” unless specifically so stated, but rather “one or more.”
  • All structural and functional equivalents to the elements of the various embodiments described throughout this disclosure that are known or later come to be known to those of ordinary skill in the art are expressly incorporated herein by reference, and are intended to be encompassed by the claims. Moreover, nothing disclosed herein is intended to be dedicated to the public regardless of whether or not such disclosure is explicitly recited in the claims. No claim element is to be construed under the provisions of 35 U.S.C. §112, sixth paragraph, unless the element is expressly recited using the phrase “means for” or, in the case of a method claim, the element is recited using the phrase “step for.”

Claims (21)

1. A haptic apparatus comprising:
a plate element positionable to extend over an anatomical segment of a user;
an elongate member coupled to the plate element and configured to be movably mounted onto the anatomical segment so as to remain substantially vertical and substantially perpendicular to the anatomical segment while the anatomical segment undergoes a motion; and
a motion restrictor responsive to a control signal to impede the motion of the anatomical segment by generating an opposing force along the elongate member in a direction normal to the anatomical segment, thereby providing tactile feedback to the user.
2. The haptic apparatus of claim 1, wherein the plate element comprises an exoskeleton plate.
3. The haptic apparatus of claim 1, wherein the opposing force generated by the motion restrictor comprises a bidirectional force that includes both an upward component and a downward component along the elongate member.
4. The haptic apparatus of claim 1,
wherein the motion restrictor comprises an actuator coupled to the elongate member and the anatomical segment; and
wherein the actuator is responsive to the control signal to cause the elongate member to become engaged onto an edge of the plate element, thereby impeding further motion of the elongate member and the anatomical segment.
5. The haptic apparatus of claim 4,
wherein the elongate member comprises a toothed blade that is rotatably mountable onto the anatomical segment, and
wherein the actuator comprises a rotation actuator configured to be disposed over the anatomical segment, the rotation actuator being responsive to the control signal to activate rotation of the blade so as to engage teeth of the blade onto the edge of the exoskeleton plate.
6. The haptic apparatus of claim 5,
wherein the rotation actuator comprises at least one of a rotary solenoid and an electric motor.
7. The haptic apparatus of claim 5, wherein the rotation actuator comprises:
a linear solenoid; and
a sheathed cable operable to be pulled by the linear solenoid
8. The haptic apparatus of claim 5, wherein the rotation actuator comprises:
a rotary solenoid; and
a sheathed cable including a core element, the core element including a shaped memory wire.
9. The haptic apparatus of claim 1,
further comprising a slider block configured to couple the elongate member to the plate element.
10. The haptic apparatus of claim 1,
wherein the motion restrictor comprises a latch mechanism configured to drive one or more pins into corresponding apertures in the elongate member and the plate element when supplied with electric power.
11. The haptic apparatus of claim 1, further comprising a controller configured to sense the motion of the anatomical segment and to compute the relative position of the anatomical segment with respect to a virtual object, the controller further configured to generate the control signal upon detecting a collision in virtual space between the virtual object and a virtual segment representing the anatomical segment.
12. The haptic apparatus of claim 1, further comprising:
a position sensor configured to detect a position and a motion of the anatomical segment; and
a controller responsive to information from the position sensor relating to the detected position and motion of the anatomical segment to compute the relative position of the anatomical segment with respect to a virtual object, and to generate the control signal upon detecting a collision in virtual space between the virtual object and a virtual segment representing the anatomical segment.
13. The haptic apparatus of claim 1,
wherein the anatomical segment comprises a finger segment,
wherein the plate element is pivotable toward a palm of the user's hand, and
further comprising a restriction mechanism configured to restrict the pivoting motion of the plate element so as to provide to the user force feedback relating to grasping of an elastic object.
14. The haptic apparatus of claim 13, wherein the restriction mechanism comprises at least one of:
a servo motor; and
a restraining cable connected to the plate element and operable to restrain the pivoting motion of the plate element.
15. The haptic apparatus of claim 1, wherein the plate element comprises at least one of a carbon composite material and a polycarbonate material.
16. The haptic apparatus of claim 1, wherein the plate element is sideways pivotable, and further comprising at least one sheet element attached to a base of the plate element, the at least one sheet element extending from a side of the anatomical segment and configured to transfer a sideway motion of the anatomical segment to the plate element.
17. A haptic apparatus comprising:
a plurality of assemblies, each assembly comprising:
an exoskeleton plate positionable so as to extend over an anatomical segment of a user;
an elongate member coupled to the exoskeleton plate and configured to be movably mounted onto the anatomical segment so as to remain substantially vertical and substantially perpendicular to the anatomical segment while the anatomical segment undergoes a motion; and
a motion restrictor responsive to a control signal to impede the motion of the anatomical segment by generating an opposing feedback force along the elongate member in a direction normal to the anatomical segment, thereby providing tactile feedback to the user.
18. The haptic apparatus of claim 17,
wherein in each of the plurality of haptic assemblies, the elongate member comprises a toothed blade that is rotatably mountable onto the anatomical segment, and
wherein in each of the plurality of haptic assemblies, the actuator comprises a rotation actuator configured to be disposed over the anatomical segment, the rotation actuator being responsive to the control signal to activate rotation of the blade to engage teeth of the blade onto the edge of the exoskeleton plate.
19. The haptic apparatus of claim 17,
further comprising a controller configured to sense the motion of an anatomical segment and the relative position of the anatomical segment with respect to a virtual object, the controller further configured to generate the control signal upon detecting a collision in virtual space between the virtual object and a virtual segment representing the anatomical segment.
20. A haptic apparatus comprising:
an exoskeleton plate positionable so as to extend over an anatomical segment of a user;
an elongate member coupled to the exoskeleton plate and configured to be movably mounted onto the anatomical segment so as to remain substantially perpendicular to the anatomical segment while the anatomical segment undergoes a motion; and
force feedback means responsive to a control signal for impeding the motion of the anatomical segment by generating an opposing feedback force along the elongate member in a direction normal to the anatomical segment, thereby providing tactile feedback to the user.
21. A method comprising:
movably mounting an elongate member to an anatomical segment of a user so that the elongate member remains substantially vertical and perpendicular to the anatomical segment while the anatomical segment undergoes a motion;
sensing a change in the position of the anatomical segment with respect to a virtual object during the motion; and
upon detection of an imminent collision between the anatomical segment and the virtual object, impeding further motion of the anatomical segment by generating an opposing force along the elongate member in a direction normal to the anatomical segment, thereby providing tactile feedback to the user.
US11/143,696 2004-06-04 2005-06-02 Haptic apparatus Expired - Fee Related US7495654B2 (en)

Priority Applications (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US11/143,696 US7495654B2 (en) 2004-06-04 2005-06-02 Haptic apparatus
PCT/US2005/019469 WO2005117766A2 (en) 2004-06-04 2005-06-03 Haptic apparatus

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US57733004P 2004-06-04 2004-06-04
US11/143,696 US7495654B2 (en) 2004-06-04 2005-06-02 Haptic apparatus

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
US20060047342A1 true US20060047342A1 (en) 2006-03-02
US7495654B2 US7495654B2 (en) 2009-02-24

Family

ID=35463310

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US11/143,696 Expired - Fee Related US7495654B2 (en) 2004-06-04 2005-06-02 Haptic apparatus

Country Status (2)

Country Link
US (1) US7495654B2 (en)
WO (1) WO2005117766A2 (en)

Cited By (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US8425528B2 (en) 2008-12-19 2013-04-23 Amicus Design Group, Llc Insertion tool for inter-body vertebral prosthetic device with self-deploying screws
US8685104B2 (en) 2012-03-19 2014-04-01 Amicus Design Group, Llc Interbody vertebral prosthetic and orthopedic fusion device with self-deploying anchors
US9566165B2 (en) 2012-03-19 2017-02-14 Amicus Design Group, Llc Interbody vertebral prosthetic and orthopedic fusion device with self-deploying anchors
US11285291B2 (en) * 2018-03-23 2022-03-29 Weart S.R.L. Haptic ring

Families Citing this family (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20080167662A1 (en) * 2007-01-08 2008-07-10 Kurtz Anthony D Tactile feel apparatus for use with robotic operations
US8028644B2 (en) * 2007-12-04 2011-10-04 Cybernet Systems Corporation Cable driven tactor
US10055022B2 (en) 2017-01-11 2018-08-21 International Business Machines Corporation Simulating obstruction in a virtual environment
US20190354183A1 (en) * 2018-05-16 2019-11-21 Immersion Corporation Kinesthetic feedback to virtual and augmented reality controllers
US10534433B1 (en) * 2018-08-24 2020-01-14 Facebook Technologies, Llc Wearable haptic devices with jamming assemblies for haptic jamming
WO2022219337A1 (en) * 2021-04-13 2022-10-20 Cambridge Mechatronics Limited Haptic glove

Citations (22)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5166972A (en) * 1988-11-15 1992-11-24 Mitel Corporation Group emergency call system
US5354162A (en) * 1991-02-26 1994-10-11 Rutgers University Actuator system for providing force feedback to portable master support
US5516249A (en) * 1994-05-10 1996-05-14 Technical Research Associates, Inc. Exoskeleton with kinesthetic feedback and robotic control
US5583478A (en) * 1995-03-01 1996-12-10 Renzi; Ronald Virtual environment tactile system
US6059506A (en) * 1990-02-02 2000-05-09 Virtual Technologies, Inc. Force feedback and texture simulating interface device
US6121923A (en) * 1999-02-19 2000-09-19 Motorola, Inc. Fixed site and satellite data-aided GPS signal acquisition method and system
US20010020937A1 (en) * 1995-01-18 2001-09-13 Immersion Corporation Computer interface apparatus including linkage having flex
US6408289B1 (en) * 1993-06-11 2002-06-18 Mri Devices Daum Gmbh Shapeable elastic body with master unit and method of controlling
US6413229B1 (en) * 1997-05-12 2002-07-02 Virtual Technologies, Inc Force-feedback interface device for the hand
US20020113771A1 (en) * 1995-06-09 2002-08-22 Louis B. Rosenberg Force feedback interface devices having finger receptacle and fluid- controlled forces
US20020175901A1 (en) * 2001-05-22 2002-11-28 Gettemy Shawn R. High transparency integrated enclosure touch screen assembly for a portable hand held device
US20020191595A1 (en) * 2001-06-18 2002-12-19 Mar Jack K. Providing communications capabilities to mobile devices at an enterprise
US6497672B2 (en) * 1997-10-24 2002-12-24 Virtual Technologies, Inc. Device and method for measuring the position of animate links
US20030055410A1 (en) * 1998-11-20 2003-03-20 Intuitive Surgical, Inc. Performing cardiac surgery without cardioplegia
US6686911B1 (en) * 1996-11-26 2004-02-03 Immersion Corporation Control knob with control modes and force feedback
US20040047461A1 (en) * 2002-09-10 2004-03-11 Weisman Jordan Kent Method and apparatus for improved conference call management
US6912230B1 (en) * 1999-02-05 2005-06-28 Tecore Multi-protocol wireless communication apparatus and method
US20050232252A1 (en) * 2004-03-01 2005-10-20 Hoover Thomas R Communication system with distributed intelligence
US20050271029A1 (en) * 2004-06-02 2005-12-08 Frederick Iffland Methods, apparatus and computer program products for testing a voice over Internet protocol communication system
US6993355B1 (en) * 2002-02-22 2006-01-31 Verizon Services Corp. Methods and apparatus for connecting family members
US7138976B1 (en) * 2000-07-13 2006-11-21 Rutgers, The State University Of New Jersey Hand force feedback and sensing system
US20070003024A1 (en) * 2005-06-22 2007-01-04 Cml Emergency Services Inc. Network emergency call taking system and method

Patent Citations (22)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5166972A (en) * 1988-11-15 1992-11-24 Mitel Corporation Group emergency call system
US6059506A (en) * 1990-02-02 2000-05-09 Virtual Technologies, Inc. Force feedback and texture simulating interface device
US5354162A (en) * 1991-02-26 1994-10-11 Rutgers University Actuator system for providing force feedback to portable master support
US6408289B1 (en) * 1993-06-11 2002-06-18 Mri Devices Daum Gmbh Shapeable elastic body with master unit and method of controlling
US5516249A (en) * 1994-05-10 1996-05-14 Technical Research Associates, Inc. Exoskeleton with kinesthetic feedback and robotic control
US20010020937A1 (en) * 1995-01-18 2001-09-13 Immersion Corporation Computer interface apparatus including linkage having flex
US5583478A (en) * 1995-03-01 1996-12-10 Renzi; Ronald Virtual environment tactile system
US20020113771A1 (en) * 1995-06-09 2002-08-22 Louis B. Rosenberg Force feedback interface devices having finger receptacle and fluid- controlled forces
US6686911B1 (en) * 1996-11-26 2004-02-03 Immersion Corporation Control knob with control modes and force feedback
US6413229B1 (en) * 1997-05-12 2002-07-02 Virtual Technologies, Inc Force-feedback interface device for the hand
US6497672B2 (en) * 1997-10-24 2002-12-24 Virtual Technologies, Inc. Device and method for measuring the position of animate links
US20030055410A1 (en) * 1998-11-20 2003-03-20 Intuitive Surgical, Inc. Performing cardiac surgery without cardioplegia
US6912230B1 (en) * 1999-02-05 2005-06-28 Tecore Multi-protocol wireless communication apparatus and method
US6121923A (en) * 1999-02-19 2000-09-19 Motorola, Inc. Fixed site and satellite data-aided GPS signal acquisition method and system
US7138976B1 (en) * 2000-07-13 2006-11-21 Rutgers, The State University Of New Jersey Hand force feedback and sensing system
US20020175901A1 (en) * 2001-05-22 2002-11-28 Gettemy Shawn R. High transparency integrated enclosure touch screen assembly for a portable hand held device
US20020191595A1 (en) * 2001-06-18 2002-12-19 Mar Jack K. Providing communications capabilities to mobile devices at an enterprise
US6993355B1 (en) * 2002-02-22 2006-01-31 Verizon Services Corp. Methods and apparatus for connecting family members
US20040047461A1 (en) * 2002-09-10 2004-03-11 Weisman Jordan Kent Method and apparatus for improved conference call management
US20050232252A1 (en) * 2004-03-01 2005-10-20 Hoover Thomas R Communication system with distributed intelligence
US20050271029A1 (en) * 2004-06-02 2005-12-08 Frederick Iffland Methods, apparatus and computer program products for testing a voice over Internet protocol communication system
US20070003024A1 (en) * 2005-06-22 2007-01-04 Cml Emergency Services Inc. Network emergency call taking system and method

Cited By (10)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US8425528B2 (en) 2008-12-19 2013-04-23 Amicus Design Group, Llc Insertion tool for inter-body vertebral prosthetic device with self-deploying screws
US8998920B2 (en) 2008-12-19 2015-04-07 Amicus Design Group, Llc Insertion tool for inter-body vertebral prosthetic device with self-deploying screws
US8685104B2 (en) 2012-03-19 2014-04-01 Amicus Design Group, Llc Interbody vertebral prosthetic and orthopedic fusion device with self-deploying anchors
US8906101B2 (en) 2012-03-19 2014-12-09 Amicus Design Group, Llc Interbody vertebral prosthetic and orthopedic fusion device with self-deploying anchors
US9107761B2 (en) 2012-03-19 2015-08-18 Amicus Design Group, Llc Interbody vertebral prosthetic and orthopedic fusion device with self-deploying anchors
US9283087B2 (en) 2012-03-19 2016-03-15 Amicus Design Group, Llc Interbody vertebral prosthetic and orthopedic fusion device with self-deploying anchors
US9566165B2 (en) 2012-03-19 2017-02-14 Amicus Design Group, Llc Interbody vertebral prosthetic and orthopedic fusion device with self-deploying anchors
US9757252B2 (en) 2012-03-19 2017-09-12 Amicus Design Group, Llc Interbody vertebral prosthetic and orthopedic fusion device with self-deploying anchors
US10058435B2 (en) 2012-03-19 2018-08-28 Amicus Design Group, Llc Interbody vertebral prosthetic and orthopedic fusion device with self-deploying anchors
US11285291B2 (en) * 2018-03-23 2022-03-29 Weart S.R.L. Haptic ring

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
WO2005117766A2 (en) 2005-12-15
WO2005117766A3 (en) 2007-11-22
US7495654B2 (en) 2009-02-24

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US7495654B2 (en) Haptic apparatus
CN105437267B (en) Adjustable spacer comb, adjustable driver and hair cutting appliance
JP7265567B2 (en) Finger-worn device using sensor and tactile sense
US20230240775A1 (en) Actuated grips for controller
KR100252706B1 (en) Force feedback and textures simulating interface device
EP2722836B1 (en) Optical sensor device and image display device
US5923318A (en) Finger manipulatable 6 degree-of-freedom input device
TW201135567A (en) Touch pad with force sensors and actuator feedback
US10882191B2 (en) Robotic system with haptic cutting tool
JP2004358634A (en) Soft finger with built-in tactile sensor
WO2008023705A1 (en) Electric pruning shears
WO2021095493A1 (en) Control device, haptic display device, and control method
KR20100134983A (en) The wearable robot for hand motion of disabled people
US20190358811A1 (en) Control Apparatus And Robot System
US6433778B1 (en) Finger operating apparatus, and arm operating apparatus using the finger operating apparatus
CN1176448C (en) Analog scalpel unit
KR101853706B1 (en) finger ring type sensing device having the middle between finger nodes
CN218052644U (en) Wearable control glove for controlling mechanical hand
KR101522775B1 (en) Tactile Sensing Device
JP7301369B2 (en) Assist force imparting tool, scissors, shearing tool
KR102550237B1 (en) Touch pad based bending sensor apparatus and robot hand control method for grasping gesture using the same
KR20190021717A (en) Adjustable robot gripper without hinge
Miyama et al. Design of a Five-Fingered Hand with Full-Fingered Tactile Sensors Using Conductive Filaments and Its Application to Bending after Insertion Motion
CN116712179A (en) Operating handle and surgical robot
CN2536192Y (en) Invented operation knife devices

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AS Assignment

Owner name: UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA, CALIFORNIA

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:KHOSHNEVIS, BEHROKH;REEL/FRAME:016440/0015

Effective date: 20050810

STCF Information on status: patent grant

Free format text: PATENTED CASE

AS Assignment

Owner name: NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION, VIRGINIA

Free format text: CONFIRMATORY LICENSE;ASSIGNOR:UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA;REEL/FRAME:023015/0946

Effective date: 20090331

FPAY Fee payment

Year of fee payment: 4

REMI Maintenance fee reminder mailed
FPAY Fee payment

Year of fee payment: 8

SULP Surcharge for late payment

Year of fee payment: 7

FEPP Fee payment procedure

Free format text: MAINTENANCE FEE REMINDER MAILED (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: REM.); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: SMALL ENTITY

LAPS Lapse for failure to pay maintenance fees

Free format text: PATENT EXPIRED FOR FAILURE TO PAY MAINTENANCE FEES (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: EXP.); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: SMALL ENTITY

STCH Information on status: patent discontinuation

Free format text: PATENT EXPIRED DUE TO NONPAYMENT OF MAINTENANCE FEES UNDER 37 CFR 1.362

FP Lapsed due to failure to pay maintenance fee

Effective date: 20210224