Recherche Images Maps Play YouTube Actualités Gmail Drive Plus »
Connexion
Les utilisateurs de lecteurs d'écran peuvent cliquer sur ce lien pour activer le mode d'accessibilité. Celui-ci propose les mêmes fonctionnalités principales, mais il est optimisé pour votre lecteur d'écran.

Brevets

  1. Recherche avancée dans les brevets
Numéro de publicationUS20060085392 A1
Type de publicationDemande
Numéro de demandeUS 10/953,187
Date de publication20 avr. 2006
Date de dépôt30 sept. 2004
Date de priorité30 sept. 2004
Autre référence de publicationCA2517542A1, CA2517542C, CN1760870A, CN1760870B, EP1643391A2, EP1643391A3
Numéro de publication10953187, 953187, US 2006/0085392 A1, US 2006/085392 A1, US 20060085392 A1, US 20060085392A1, US 2006085392 A1, US 2006085392A1, US-A1-20060085392, US-A1-2006085392, US2006/0085392A1, US2006/085392A1, US20060085392 A1, US20060085392A1, US2006085392 A1, US2006085392A1
InventeursLee Wang, Ying Li
Cessionnaire d'origineMicrosoft Corporation
Exporter la citationBiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan
Liens externes: USPTO, Cession USPTO, Espacenet
System and method for automatic generation of search results based on local intention
US 20060085392 A1
Résumé
A system and related techniques automatically analyze Web search and other activity, to generate locality-selected results based on not just the user's location, but also the business or other content provider's location and the degree of local intent in the user's query. The locality or region to the user may be identified, for instance, by the presence of geographic clues or indicators in the general content of the Web site, for instance, the presence of ZIP codes, telephone numbers, town names or other semantic or other indicators which have some geographic connotation in search terms, key words or other query or semantic inputs. The user's degree of local intent may be automatically analyzed as well, for instance by the presence of terms such as “car repair” or “pizza restaurant” which may suggest the user intends to locate local goods, services or providers. The search service may then access a content database to identify ads or other media or content which match or correspond to the detected locality or region, such as ads for local restaurants, car dealerships, physicians or other services or products, and which correspond in location, working radius and degree of localness to the user's query. Because the delivery of localized search results according to the invention is specifically filtered for user-driven local intent, advertisements and other media or content may be delivered which better match the user's search objectives.
Images(8)
Previous page
Next page
Revendications(36)
1. A system for generating locality-selected search results, comprising:
an input interface to receive a set of search terms for a user search;
an interface to a content store, the content store storing localized content; and
a locality engine, communicating with the input interface and the interface to the content store, the locality engine processing the search terms to analyze a local intent of the search and generate locality-selected search results based on at least a match of the localized content with a location of the user and the local intent of the search.
2. A system according to claim 1, wherein the localized content comprises localized advertisements.
3. A system according to claim 1, wherein the localized content comprises content contributed by subscribers to the content store.
4. A system according to claim 3, wherein the subscribers comprise paid subscribers.
5. A system according to claim 1, wherein the locality engine analyzes a local intent of the localized content for matching to the local intent of the search.
6. A system according to claim 3, wherein the subscribers indicate a local intent for the localized content.
7. A system according to claim 1, wherein the locality engine analyzes the local intent of the search based on a set of locality indicators comprising at least one of a geographic area name, telephone number information and address information.
8. A system according to claim 7, wherein the set of locality indicators comprises address information, and the address information comprises a postal ZIP code.
9. A system according to claim 1, wherein the locality engine analyzes the set of locality indicators based on at least one of an exact match and a partial match of the set of search terms.
10. A system according to claim 1, wherein the locality engine analyzes the local intent based on a function of at least one of a frequency of locality identifiers in the set of search terms, a separation of locality identifiers in the set of search terms, and a positional a tree of locality identifiers in the set of search terms.
11. A system according to claim 1, wherein the content store comprises an ad table.
12. A system according to claim 1, wherein the locality-selected search results are presented via a Web page.
13. A method for generating locality-selected search results, comprising:
receiving a set of search terms for a user search;
processing the search terms to analyze a local intent of the search and generate locality-selected search results based on at least a match of localized content with a location of the user and a local intent of the search.
14. A method according to claim 13, wherein the localized content comprises localized advertisements.
15. A method according to claim 13, wherein the localized content comprises content contributed by subscribers.
16. A method according to claim 15, wherein the subscribers comprise paid subscribers.
17. A method according to claim 13, further comprising analyzing a local intent of the localized content for matching to the local intent of the search.
18. A method according to claim 15, wherein the subscribers indicate a local intent for the localized content.
19. A method according to claim 13, wherein the processing comprises analyzing the local intent of the search based on a set of locality indicators comprising at least one of a geographic area name, telephone number information and address information.
20. A method according to claim 19, wherein the set of locality indicators comprises address information, and the address information comprises a postal ZIP code.
21. A method according to claim 13, wherein the processing comprises analyzing the set of locality indicators based on at least one of an exact match and a partial match of the set of search terms.
22. A method according to claim 13, wherein the processing comprises analyzing the local intent based on a function of at least one of a frequency of locality identifiers in the set of search terms, a separation of locality identifiers in the set of search terms, and a positional a tree of locality identifiers in the set of search terms.
23. A method according to claim 13, wherein the localized content is stored in an ad table.
24. A method according to claim 13, further comprising presenting the locality-selected search results via a Web page.
25. A set of locality-selected search results, the set of locality-selected search results being generated by a method of:
receiving a set of search terms for a user search;
processing the search terms to analyze a local intent of the search and generate locality-selected search results based on at least a match of localized content with a location of the user and a local intent of the search.
26. A set of locality-selected search results according to claim 25, wherein the localized content comprises localized advertisements.
27. A set of locality-selected search results according to claim 25, wherein the localized content comprises content contributed by subscribers.
28. A set of locality-selected search results according to claim 27, wherein the subscribers comprise paid subscribers.
29. A set of locality-selected search results according to claim 25, wherein the method further comprises analyzing a local intent of the localized content for matching to the local intent of the search.
30. A set of locality-selected search results according to claim 27, wherein the subscribers indicate a local intent for the localized content.
31. A set of locality-selected search results according to claim 25, wherein the processing comprises analyzing the local intent of the search based on a set of locality indicators comprising at least one of a geographic area name, telephone number information and address information.
32. A set of locality-selected search results according to claim 31, wherein the set of locality indicators comprises address information, and the address information comprises a postal ZIP code.
33. A set of locality-selected search results according to claim 25, wherein the processing comprises analyzing the set of locality indicators based on at least one of an exact match and a partial match of the set of search terms.
34. A set of locality-selected search results according to claim 25, wherein the processing comprises analyzing the local intent based on a function of at least one of a frequency of locality identifiers in the set of search terms, a separation of locality identifiers in the set of search terms, and a positional a tree of locality identifiers in the set of search terms.
35. A set of locality-selected search results according to claim 25, wherein the localized content is stored in an ad table.
36. A set of locality-selected search results according to claim 25, wherein the method further comprises presenting the locality-selected search results via a Web page.
Description
    CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATION
  • [0001]
    Not applicable.
  • STATEMENT REGARDING FEDERALLY SPONSORED RESEARCH OR DEVELOPMENT
  • [0002]
    Not applicable.
  • FIELD OF THE INVENTION
  • [0003]
    The invention relates to the field of network services, and more particularly to a platform for automatically detecting a user's local search intentions and delivering locality-based advertisements or other Web or other media based on a geographic match.
  • BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
  • [0004]
    The advent of commercial paid advertisements and other media content has led to an increased demand for more highly targeted and effective marketing campaigns on the Internet. One general approach in delivering search results or other content to users consists of attempting to supply a user or groups of users with advertisements for businesses within some general geographic area of that user. Thus, a user who enters a search including a postal ZIP code, telephone number or other identifying information may be presented with advertisements for businesses or services such as local restaurants, news, retailers or other content, based on the corresponding location.
  • [0005]
    However, even search services which track user queries to attempt to generate localized results rely on lookups against possible geographic matches in ZIP code, area code or other regional identifiers. However, the potential geographic connotations of search terms by themselves can be ambiguous or misleading. For instance, a user may enter a brand, class, general name or category of products or services such as “Seattle's Best Coffee”, “Kansas City barbecue” or “Canada Dry Ginger Ale”, and under such platforms have search results returned which are not related to their actual geographic location, but instead the inferred location of the vendor or source. In other cases, regional results may be returned but those results may not be sorted or filtered according to the location of the user, the location of the business or their relative proximity to each other. In all cases, available search services do not include an ability to assess the “localness” or degree of local intent in a user's search, which degree of intention may assist in identifying, filtering or ordering results. Other problems in localized search delivery exist.
  • SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
  • [0006]
    The invention overcoming these and other problems in the art relates in one regard to a system and method for automatic generation of search results based on local intention, in which a user's desire for local or geographically focused information or results may be automatically assessed and factored into result selection and ordering. According to embodiments of the invention in one regard, the search framework enables the platform to detect and gauge the local search intentions of the end user, the search query and media content such as paid advertisements or listings, and then match a user/query's localness degree with that of a paid listing or other content. According to embodiments of the invention in another regard, source content such as advertisements, Web documents or others may be scanned to execute a fault-tolerant match of text words in or related to location names, and the discovery of a best matching location path(s) from country down to zip level for a given text or other content stream. Advertisement or other content location may be defined in this manner, or specified by an advertiser or other entity. Once locations for advertisements or other content is identified, the platform may match advertisements or other content to a user or search query based on location and the degree of local intent in the user's inquiry, starting from an exact match to extended matches. According to embodiments of the invention in another regard, a working business radius may be defined to control how far geographically to match an ad with a user or query for a given business or other category.
  • BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
  • [0007]
    FIG. 1 illustrates an architecture in which a system and method for automatic generation of search results based on local intention may operate, according to embodiments of the invention.
  • [0008]
    FIG. 2 illustrates a content delivery flow, according to embodiments of the invention.
  • [0009]
    FIG. 3 illustrates a maximum working radius which may be employed to identify candidate advertisements or other content, according to embodiments of the invention.
  • [0010]
    FIG. 4 illustrates a graphical relationship between working radius and query location, according to embodiments of the invention.
  • [0011]
    FIG. 5 illustrates a semantic tree which may be used to analyze local query intent, according to embodiments of the invention.
  • [0012]
    FIG. 6 illustrates a semantic tree which may be used to analyze local query intent in another regard, according to embodiments of the invention.
  • [0013]
    FIG. 7 illustrates a flowchart of overall local intention-based search and other processing, according to embodiments of the invention.
  • DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF EMBODIMENTS
  • [0014]
    FIG. 1 illustrates an architecture in which a system and method for automatic generation of search results based on local intention may operate, according to embodiments of the invention. As illustrated in that figure, in embodiments a user may operate a client 102, such as a personal computer, network-equipped cellular telephone or other mobile device, or other client or machine using a user interface 112 such as a graphical user interface, to perform search activity, Web or Internet surfing, view, download or manipulate files or perform other tasks. In embodiments the user interface 112 may be, include or present an application such as a Web browser to permit a user to view Web, Internet or other network sites, such as intranet sites or other content.
  • [0015]
    In embodiments, the user may use Web browser or other application or interface to engage in search activity, for example hosted by search service 106 or other search facility or engine. According to embodiments of the invention in one regard, the user may operate a browser or other application or interface to input a set of search terms 104, such as typed-in text, words, number or other data, for transmission to search service 106 via the Internet or other network or connection. According to embodiments of the invention in a general regard, the search service 106 and associated resources may generally speaking receive and analyze the user's search query to determine whether the user is seeking to obtain results related to or representing local advertising, content or media, and to what degree that user may be seeking locality-selected content. According to embodiments of the invention in those regards, search service 106 may include or interface to a locality engine 116 which may analyze the user's local intent, the query's local intent, and/or the local intent of advertisements or other media to arrive at a set of locality-selected results 110 to present to the user of client 102 via user interface 112 or otherwise.
  • [0016]
    As one component of the process of assessing the local nature of the search or other event, according to embodiments of the invention the locality engine 116 or other resource may detect an explicit or inferred location of the user. This may be captured or inferred, for example, by a reverse look-up of the user's Internet protocol (IP) address which may be related to a host for that address or related service. The user's location in cases may also be identified through the user's registration or subscription to search service 106 including the recording of a home or other address or location. Other techniques for determining the user's location are possible.
  • [0017]
    In addition to user location, as further illustrated for instance in FIG. 2, the locality engine 116 may analyze the location and/or local intent of the set of search terms 104 themselves, to more accurately or appropriately match the user's location and/or local query intent advertisements or other content. That advertising or other content may for example be stored or hosted in a content database 108. Content database 108 may be, include or interface to an ad table 118 which may, for example, contain or store advertisements or other content. That content may in embodiments be categorized by, analyzed for or marked with an indication of, the geographic location and local intent of the content stored therein. According to embodiments for example illustrated in FIG. 3, for selected advertisers or other content providers, categories of providers or all providers, the content for those providers may be assigned a maximum working radius 118 which designates the probable distance inside of which a local user who is seeking that type of product or service would be interested.
  • [0018]
    For instance, for the category of retail car dealerships, the maximum working radius may be assigned a value of 100 miles on the assumption that most consumers would not be willing or would not prefer to travel more than that radius to investigate a potential car purchase. Other categories, business types and distances are possible. As for instance illustrated in FIG. 4, for a given merchant or vendor category, a working business radius (WBR) may be estimated or empirically measured which captures increasing proportions of queries of interest depending on distance, from which a suitable combination of distance and query yield may be selected. That working distance or radius may inform maximum working radius 118, when employed.
  • [0019]
    In general then, and as for instance likewise illustrated in FIG. 2, both user information and query information may be transmitted to locality engine 116, which may in turn likewise interrogate the content database 108 for locality-matched advertisements which may be more likely to satisfy the user's query or interest. Thus, for example, a user entering a set of search terms 104 such as “Seattle Mercedes dealerships” may be logically inferred to be seeking potential local outlets for an automotive brand in the Seattle metropolitan area. When that local intent or objective is determined, the locality engine 116 may then interrogate the content database 108 for car dealers or vendors appropriately matching the set of search terms 104, in the geographic area of interest to the buyer. Towards these purposes, according to embodiments of the invention the locality engine 116 or other resource may parse and analyze the set of search terms 104 to generate an assessment of the degree of the local quality or nature of the user's query.
  • [0020]
    More particularly, according to embodiments the set of search terms 104 may be analyzed by locality engine 116 to generate a quantitative assessment or metric of the degree of local intent reflected in the user's query. According to embodiments, there may be one query local intent measure (QLIM) generated for each search term, which may gauge the degree of local search intention when a typical user searches for this term. The QLIM measure may not necessarily be associated with a specific location, but instead may reflect a generic index showing whether a user will be interested in local content when they search for this term. The QLIM or other metric may be calculated offline from at least the following sets of data, in order:
      • 1. The search term itself,
      • 2. Clicked results from the search term, and
      • 3. Related search terms.
  • [0024]
    Each step or level in this processing sequence may add accuracy to the resulting QLIM score. That measure may in embodiments be generated according to techniques as follows.
  • [0025]
    Step 1: Initial QLIM calculation from search term.
  • [0026]
    In this step, the given term itself may be parsed for local keywords. The keywords may be searched against a local keyword collection or dictionary, for instance compiling town, city, state or other names, addresses, telephone numbers or area codes or postal ZIP codes. An initial score of the QLIM may be calculated using a formula such as:
    QLIM1=local keyword count/keyword count,
      • QLIM1 having value ranges between 0 and 1.
  • [0028]
    For example, the search term “BMW” within the set of search terms 104 may have a QLIM score of 0.0. “BMW Redmond” may have a QLIM score of 0.5, while “Redmond weather” may have a QLIM score of 1.0. The locality engine 116 or search service 106 may maintain a list or database of locality-related search terms, and record their QLIM or other locality measures. The locality engine 116 may define a threshold, T1, for deciding whether subsequent steps will need to be executed to adjust or refine QLIM values. For example, with a threshold of T1=1, all search terms that consist of any non-local keywords may be sent to subsequent steps for QLIM adjustment. For those terms whose QLIM values are above T1, this type of processing may stop.
  • [0029]
    Step 2: QLIM adjustment from clicked results.
  • [0030]
    In embodiments, for terms whose QLIM1 values are below the defined threshold, a further step may be performed to add accuracy to the QLIM value from the clicked content from this search term. By for instance aggregating non-paid and paid content clicked from a search term, a result tree rooted from this search term may be obtained. A result tree presents actual user search experience on the root term. The approach in Step 2 is to adjust QLIM by using the clicked local intention measure (CLIM) of the clicked content. The CLIM of the clicked content may also be weighted by relatedness to the search term. A site which received the most number of clicks from a search term may not be the most relevant site.
  • [0031]
    For example, site A will not be very relevant to a term if a majority of users clicked on site A also later clicked or navigated to site B when searching for the given term. In this example, Site B should be more relevant to the term if majority of users who search for the given term stopped at site B. (That is, B is the last site these users visited in their search sessions). This results in a heuristic which may be applied by locality engine 116 or other resources, that a clicked site is most related to a search term if this site has the largest number of searches for the given term stopped at this site.
  • [0032]
    Traffic drain, D, may be defined to be the outgoing traffic from a clicked site that does not go into another clicked site. In other words, D denotes the amount of the outbound “leak” traffic out of the result tree from each result node. Then, there is a:
    Property of D: Sum(D) on all results=incoming traffic to the search term.
  • [0033]
    This step uses D-weighted CLIM values of clicked results to adjust the QLIM of the search term:
    QLIM2=sum(D(ClickedResult)*CLIM(ClickedResult))/sum(D(ClickedResult))
  • [0034]
    The sum may be taken on all clicked result sites. The adjusted QLIM2 may range between 0 and 1, or other values.
  • [0035]
    FIG. 5 illustrates an example result tree for the search term “pizza”, generated according to embodiments of the invention. Similar to Step 1, a threshold, T2, may be defined for this step. Now the adjusted QLIM is:
    QLIM=QLIM+(1−QLIM)*QLIM2
      • If QLM>=T2, then stop.
  • [0037]
    For terms with QLIM<T2, a further Step 3 will need to be executed to try to further detect local search intention.
  • [0038]
    Step 3: Further QLIM adjustment from search term network.
  • [0039]
    By aggregating the search term click stream resulting from the set of search terms 104, a search term network may be obtained. In this network, each search term can have a number of descendant terms, which are the search terms users searched after the given term in the same search session. The approach of this step is to use the QLIM values of descendant terms to collectively further refine or adjust the QLIM of the parent term.
  • [0040]
    A term, the train, D, may be calculated for each descendant term, relative to the incoming traffic to the term of interest. A descendant term with a larger D is better relevant (or related) to the term of interest because users search the term of interest also tend to search this descendant term and then go away.
  • [0041]
    Adjusted QLIM from Step 3:
    QLIM3=sum(D(DescendantTerm)*QLIM(DecendentTerm))/sum(D(DescendantTerm)),
    where the sum is across all descendant terms. QLIM3 may range between 0 and 1 or take on other values. FIG. 6 illustrates a term network and calculated QLIM3. Now the adjusted QLIM is:
    QLIM=QLIM+(1−QLIM)*QLIM3
  • [0042]
    This is a last step for detection of the local intention embodied in the set of search terms 104. It may be noted that according to further embodiments of the invention, a user may be also assigned a user local intention measure (ULIM) which gauges a user's general local intention from a pattern of searches performed by that user over a period of time. When used, ULIM may be calculated using QLIM and D values of the terms a user searched, which are a subset of the term network:
    ULIM=sum(D(SearchedTerm)*QLIM(SearchedTerm))/sum(D(SearchedTerm))
  • [0043]
    The sum is across all searched terms by the user.
  • [0044]
    With these or other query and user measures defined, the locality engine 116 may match the local quality, nature or intention of the set of search terms 104 to that of advertisements or other listings or content in content database 108. A search's composite local intention measure, SLIM, may for example be expressed as:
    SLIM=max(QLIM(query), ULIM(user))
    where QLIM and ULIM are localness measure of the search query and the end user, respectively, SLIM simply taking the max of QLIM and ULIM. In embodiments, the query measure QLIM may be used by itself. According to embodiments of the invention in another regard, the content of content database 108 may be subjected to similar localness measures as the query measure (QLIM) or other metrics. This measure, which may for instance be denoted as a content local intention measure, may be generated for instance by parsing the HTML, XML or other content of advertisements or other content or media for local indicators, in a similar fashion to which queries may be processed. Advertisers or other participants may also, in embodiments, be permitted or required to specifically supply a rating of the localness of their own content. According to embodiments of the invention in one regard, the resulting CLIM values, for individual content or lists of content, may be used to match against the QLIM, SLIM or other measure of an incoming search query as calculated by the formulas above, or otherwise.
  • [0045]
    According to embodiments of the invention in another regard, in implementations the SLIM and CLIM values may be Booleanized by locality engine 116 for purposes of generating an overall localness match. A search localness intention flag may be defined for each search: SLIF = 1 , when SLIM >= Ts = 0 , otherwise
    where Ts is a threshold value. Similarly, a localness intention flag may be defined for content in content database 108 as: CLIF = 1 , when CLIM >= Tc = 0 , otherwise .
  • [0046]
    Global localness matching may then proceed according to the following steps:
  • [0047]
    1. When a search's SLIF=1, only those listings with CLIF=1 match the search.
  • [0048]
    2. When a search's SLIF=0, CLIF is not a matching criterion for selecting content for delivery. Other Boolean and other flags or values are possible.
  • [0049]
    According to embodiments of the invention in one regard, therefore, and globally speaking, advertisements or other content with a significant degree local intentions may be matched only to a set of search terms 104 with a significant degree of local intentions. Other metrics, comparisons and matching criteria are possible, but in all cases the locality engine 116 and other resources of the invention do not merely retrieve advertisements or other content for presentation to the user based only on geographic keyword matching, but on an attempt to identify and quantitatively evaluate the user's local objective in the search. It may be noted that for searches that do not show a significant degree of local intention, content from content database 108 may be delivered without filtering for geographic match.
  • [0050]
    Overall locality detection and content processing is illustrated in FIG. 7. In step 702, processing may begin. In step 704, the search service 106 or other search engine or facility may receive a query including search terms 104, such as word, text, numeric or other expressions or input. In step 706, the search terms 104 of the search query may be parsed by locality engine 116 to detect or match those terms to geographic identifiers or indicators, such as state, city or town names, addresses including postal ZIP codes, telephone numbers including area codes, or other geographical or regional indicators. In step 708, the locality engine 116 may generate an assessment or rating of the user's physical location as well as the local intent of the query, for instance by way of detected keywords or locality identifiers, their frequency, hierarchical location within a search tree, or other criteria or factors.
  • [0051]
    In step 710, the locality engine 116 or other resource may interrogate the content database 108 for a match to the geographic indicator or identifiers associated with the user or user's query, to the user's or query's evaluated location or other location information. In step 712, a comparison of the user's or query's evaluated location, local intent of the query may be generated against locality-matched advertisements or other content within content database 108, for instance stored in ad table 118 or otherwise. In step 714, locality-selected results 110 resulting from those comparisons or reports may be transmitted and presented to the user at client 102 or other device or location. In step 716, the locality-selected results 110 may be refined based on further queries or filtering, or based on the user clicking or otherwise selecting URLs or other content within locality-selected results 110, or otherwise. In step 718, processing may repeat, return to a prior processing point, jump to a further processing point or end.
  • [0052]
    The foregoing description of the invention is illustrative, and modifications in configuration and implementation will occur to persons skilled in the art. For instance, while the invention has generally been described in terms of the parsing of a set of search terms inputted to a search service site to determine the presence or degree of locality-based content, in embodiments other user inputs or other search, query or other sources or events may be scanned, such as text strings from Web sites, text strings inputted via network-enabled cellular or other devices, or other content sources. Likewise, while the invention has in some regards been described as involving the delivery of local content received from advertisers participating in a paid-for or subscription based network service, in embodiments localized ads or other content may be received from other sources, such as for example advertisers or others who do not participate or do not pay for their participation in a network or service.
  • [0053]
    Similarly, while the invention has in embodiments been described as delivering selectable advertisements or other content from a single content database 108, in embodiments the local ads or other content delivered to the client 102 or other destinations from multiple databases or other storage or sources. Other hardware, software or other resources described as singular may in embodiments be distributed, and similarly in embodiments resources described as distributed may be combined. The scope of the invention is accordingly intended to be limited only by the following claims.
Citations de brevets
Brevet cité Date de dépôt Date de publication Déposant Titre
US6029195 *5 déc. 199722 févr. 2000Herz; Frederick S. M.System for customized electronic identification of desirable objects
US6108650 *21 août 199822 août 2000Myway.Com CorporationMethod and apparatus for an accelerated radius search
US6317718 *26 févr. 199913 nov. 2001Accenture Properties (2) B.V.System, method and article of manufacture for location-based filtering for shopping agent in the physical world
US6523021 *31 juil. 200018 févr. 2003Microsoft CorporationBusiness directory search engine
US6625595 *5 juil. 200023 sept. 2003Bellsouth Intellectual Property CorporationMethod and system for selectively presenting database results in an information retrieval system
US6701307 *28 oct. 19982 mars 2004Microsoft CorporationMethod and apparatus of expanding web searching capabilities
US6801909 *23 juil. 20015 oct. 2004Triplehop Technologies, Inc.System and method for obtaining user preferences and providing user recommendations for unseen physical and information goods and services
US7257570 *22 déc. 200314 août 2007Yahoo! Inc.Geographical location extraction
US20020087522 *29 déc. 20004 juil. 2002Macgregor RobertMethod and apparatus for facilitating internet based sales transactions by local vendors
US20020156792 *6 déc. 200124 oct. 2002Biosentients, Inc.Intelligent object handling device and method for intelligent object data in heterogeneous data environments with high data density and dynamic application needs
US20040030689 *8 août 200312 févr. 2004Anderson David J.Method and system for selectively presenting database results in an information retrieval system
US20040093325 *7 nov. 200213 mai 2004International Business Machines CorporationSystem and method for location influenced network search
US20050050027 *12 avr. 20043 mars 2005Leslie YehDetermining and/or using location information in an ad system
US20050060430 *7 oct. 200317 mars 2005Whereonearth LimitedMethod of determining a likely geographical location
US20050065916 *31 déc. 200324 mars 2005Xianping GeMethods and systems for improving a search ranking using location awareness
US20050080786 *14 oct. 200314 avr. 2005Fish Edmund J.System and method for customizing search results based on searcher's actual geographic location
US20050108213 *22 déc. 200319 mai 2005Whereonearth LimitedGeographical location extraction
US20050222989 *24 juin 20046 oct. 2005Taher HaveliwalaResults based personalization of advertisements in a search engine
US20050228780 *5 avr. 200413 oct. 2005Yahoo! Inc.Search system using search subdomain and hints to subdomains in search query statements and sponsored results on a subdomain-by-subdomain basis
US20050240580 *13 juil. 200427 oct. 2005Zamir Oren EPersonalization of placed content ordering in search results
US20050256766 *30 mai 200317 nov. 2005Garcia Johann SMethod and system for targeted internet search engine
US20050273469 *12 août 20058 déc. 2005Microsoft CorporationMethod and system for providing service listings in electronic yellow pages
US20050278309 *2 juin 200415 déc. 2005Perry EvansSystem and method for mining and searching localized business-marketing and informational data
US20050283464 *10 juin 200422 déc. 2005Allsup James FMethod and apparatus for selective internet advertisement
US20060004713 *30 juin 20045 janv. 2006Korte Thomas CMethods and systems for endorsing local search results
US20060010108 *12 juil. 200412 janv. 2006Greenberg Joel KMethod and system for collecting and posting local advertising to a site accessible via a computer network
US20060026013 *29 juil. 20042 févr. 2006Yahoo! Inc.Search systems and methods using in-line contextual queries
US20060101005 *11 oct. 200511 mai 2006Yang Wendy WSystem and method for managing and presenting entity information
US20070288437 *11 juin 200713 déc. 2007Xiongwu XiaMethods and apparatus providing local search engine
Référencé par
Brevet citant Date de dépôt Date de publication Déposant Titre
US7483881 *30 déc. 200427 janv. 2009Google Inc.Determining unambiguous geographic references
US7558805 *1 mars 20067 juil. 2009Aol LlcSearching content on web pages
US7756903 *12 déc. 200613 juil. 2010Yahoo! Inc.Configuring a search engine results page with environment-specific information
US77683955 juin 20073 août 2010Gold Steven KBrand mapping
US7769745 *15 déc. 20063 août 2010Yahoo! Inc.Visualizing location-based datasets using “tag maps”
US776980417 janv. 20063 août 2010Microsoft CorporationServer side search with multi-word word wheeling and wildcard expansion
US777434828 mars 200710 août 2010Yahoo, Inc.System for providing geographically relevant content to a search query with local intent
US777883730 nov. 200617 août 2010Microsoft CorporationDemographic based classification for local word wheeling/web search
US7788252 *28 mars 200731 août 2010Yahoo, Inc.System for determining local intent in a search query
US780545028 mars 200728 sept. 2010Yahoo, Inc.System for determining the geographic range of local intent in a search query
US793339527 juin 200626 avr. 2011Google Inc.Virtual tour of user-defined paths in a geographic information system
US793389711 oct. 200626 avr. 2011Google Inc.Entity display priority in a distributed geographic information system
US793392927 juin 200626 avr. 2011Google Inc.Network link for providing dynamic data layer in a geographic information system
US797075010 mars 200928 juin 2011Aol Inc.Category searching
US797499414 mai 20075 juil. 2011Microsoft CorporationSensitive webpage content detection
US79871958 avr. 200826 juil. 2011Google Inc.Dynamic determination of location-identifying search phrases
US801512914 avr. 20086 sept. 2011Microsoft CorporationParsimonious multi-resolution value-item lists
US802431718 nov. 200820 sept. 2011Yahoo! Inc.System and method for deriving income from URL based context queries
US8032427 *3 avr. 20074 oct. 2011Local.comSystem for providing localized shopping information
US803250818 nov. 20084 oct. 2011Yahoo! Inc.System and method for URL based query for retrieving data related to a context
US804164818 juil. 200618 oct. 2011Allstate Insurance CompanyRetail location services
US80556755 déc. 20088 nov. 2011Yahoo! Inc.System and method for context based query augmentation
US806049218 nov. 200815 nov. 2011Yahoo! Inc.System and method for generation of URL based context queries
US80691426 déc. 200729 nov. 2011Yahoo! Inc.System and method for synchronizing data on a network
US807860118 déc. 200813 déc. 2011Google Inc.Determining unambiguous geographic references
US810814430 juin 200831 janv. 2012Apple Inc.Location based tracking
US810877830 sept. 200831 janv. 2012Yahoo! Inc.System and method for context enhanced mapping within a user interface
US81272461 oct. 200728 févr. 2012Apple Inc.Varying user interface element based on movement
US814056617 févr. 200920 mars 2012Yahoo! Inc.Open framework for integrating, associating, and interacting with content objects including automatic feed creation
US814564520 mai 201027 mars 2012Yahoo! Inc.System for identifying geographically relevant advertisements from a search query
US815096724 mars 20093 avr. 2012Yahoo! Inc.System and method for verified presence tracking
US816601619 déc. 200824 avr. 2012Yahoo! Inc.System and method for automated service recommendations
US816616817 déc. 200724 avr. 2012Yahoo! Inc.System and method for disambiguating non-unique identifiers using information obtained from disparate communication channels
US817580225 janv. 20088 mai 2012Apple Inc.Adaptive route guidance based on preferences
US818037922 févr. 200815 mai 2012Apple Inc.Synchronizing mobile and vehicle devices
US818553812 juil. 201022 mai 2012Yahoo! Inc.System for determining the geographic range of local intent in a search query
US81956537 janv. 20095 juin 2012Microsoft CorporationRelevance improvements for implicit local queries
US82046848 janv. 200819 juin 2012Apple Inc.Adaptive mobile device navigation
US821338915 avr. 20083 juil. 2012Apple Inc.Location determination using formula
US821953518 juin 200810 juil. 2012Allstate Insurance CompanyRetail deployment model
US827150631 mars 200818 sept. 2012Yahoo! Inc.System and method for modeling relationships between entities
US82753523 janv. 200825 sept. 2012Apple Inc.Location-based emergency information
US8281027 *19 sept. 20082 oct. 2012Yahoo! Inc.System and method for distributing media related to a location
US829051325 févr. 200816 oct. 2012Apple Inc.Location-based services
US829094217 févr. 201116 oct. 2012Google Inc.Entity display priority in a distributed geographic information system
US830702910 déc. 20076 nov. 2012Yahoo! Inc.System and method for conditional delivery of messages
US831152627 mai 200813 nov. 2012Apple Inc.Location-based categorical information services
US833240225 janv. 200811 déc. 2012Apple Inc.Location based media items
US835084914 mai 20128 janv. 2013Google Inc.Dynamic view-based data layer in a geographic information system
US8352466 *22 déc. 20088 janv. 2013Yahoo! Inc.System and method of geo-based prediction in search result selection
US8355862 *6 janv. 200815 janv. 2013Apple Inc.Graphical user interface for presenting location information
US835964318 sept. 200822 janv. 2013Apple Inc.Group formation using anonymous broadcast information
US836461113 août 200929 janv. 2013Yahoo! Inc.System and method for precaching information on a mobile device
US836986730 juin 20085 févr. 2013Apple Inc.Location sharing
US8370319 *8 mars 20115 févr. 2013A9.Com, Inc.Determining search query specificity
US838594625 janv. 200826 févr. 2013Apple Inc.Disfavored route progressions or locations
US83859647 juin 201126 févr. 2013Xone, Inc.Methods and apparatuses for geospatial-based sharing of information by multiple devices
US838650621 août 200826 févr. 2013Yahoo! Inc.System and method for context enhanced messaging
US840235622 nov. 200619 mars 2013Yahoo! Inc.Methods, systems and apparatus for delivery of media
US845252910 janv. 200828 mai 2013Apple Inc.Adaptive navigation system for estimating travel times
US845285527 juin 200828 mai 2013Yahoo! Inc.System and method for presentation of media related to a context
US84632382 janv. 200811 juin 2013Apple Inc.Mobile device base station
US8484222 *1 déc. 20069 juil. 2013Google Inc.Method and apparatus for identifying a standalone location
US851481629 juin 201220 août 2013Apple Inc.Location determination using formula
US853845811 mars 200817 sept. 2013X One, Inc.Location sharing and tracking using mobile phones or other wireless devices
US85388113 mars 200817 sept. 2013Yahoo! Inc.Method and apparatus for social network marketing with advocate referral
US854873530 janv. 20121 oct. 2013Apple Inc.Location based tracking
US85546233 mars 20088 oct. 2013Yahoo! Inc.Method and apparatus for social network marketing with consumer referral
US85603903 mars 200815 oct. 2013Yahoo! Inc.Method and apparatus for social network marketing with brand referral
US8577889 *18 juil. 20065 nov. 2013Aol Inc.Searching for transient streaming multimedia resources
US858366830 juil. 200812 nov. 2013Yahoo! Inc.System and method for context enhanced mapping
US858948628 mars 200819 nov. 2013Yahoo! Inc.System and method for addressing communications
US85947026 nov. 200626 nov. 2013Yahoo! Inc.Context server for associating information based on context
US860100830 avr. 20123 déc. 2013Yahoo! Inc.System for determining the geographic range of local intent in a search query
US864484316 mai 20084 févr. 2014Apple Inc.Location determination
US86605301 mai 200925 févr. 2014Apple Inc.Remotely receiving and communicating commands to a mobile device for execution by the mobile device
US86663671 mai 20094 mars 2014Apple Inc.Remotely locating and commanding a mobile device
US867074830 mars 201011 mars 2014Apple Inc.Remotely locating and commanding a mobile device
US867115410 déc. 200711 mars 2014Yahoo! Inc.System and method for contextual addressing of communications on a network
US869402615 oct. 20128 avr. 2014Apple Inc.Location based services
US869452812 juil. 20118 avr. 2014Google Inc.Dynamic determination of location-identifying search phrases
US870640627 juin 200822 avr. 2014Yahoo! Inc.System and method for determination and display of personalized distance
US871244111 avr. 201329 avr. 2014Xone, Inc.Methods and systems for temporarily sharing position data between mobile-device users
US87129893 déc. 201029 avr. 2014Microsoft CorporationWild card auto completion
US87380399 nov. 201227 mai 2014Apple Inc.Location-based categorical information services
US8745028 *20 avr. 20123 juin 2014Google Inc.Interpreting adjacent search terms based on a hierarchical relationship
US874513328 mars 20083 juin 2014Yahoo! Inc.System and method for optimizing the storage of data
US875089818 janv. 201310 juin 2014X One, Inc.Methods and systems for annotating target locations
US87620566 févr. 200824 juin 2014Apple Inc.Route reference
US876228524 juin 200824 juin 2014Yahoo! Inc.System and method for message clustering
US876909928 déc. 20061 juil. 2014Yahoo! Inc.Methods and systems for pre-caching information on a mobile computing device
US87748256 juin 20088 juil. 2014Apple Inc.Integration of map services with user applications in a mobile device
US8787937 *1 oct. 200722 juil. 2014Samsung Electronics Co., LtdMethod and apparatus for providing internet service based on user's location information in a communication system
US878853524 déc. 201222 juil. 2014Smooth Productions Inc.Communication network system and service provider
US87985937 mai 20135 août 2014X One, Inc.Location sharing and tracking using mobile phones or other wireless devices
US879864530 janv. 20135 août 2014X One, Inc.Methods and systems for sharing position data and tracing paths between mobile-device users
US879864715 oct. 20135 août 2014X One, Inc.Tracking proximity of services provider to services consumer
US879937124 sept. 20085 août 2014Yahoo! Inc.System and method for conditional delivery of messages
US880580514 juin 201212 août 2014Allstate Insurance CompanyRetail deployment model
US881310727 juin 200819 août 2014Yahoo! Inc.System and method for location based media delivery
US883163521 juil. 20119 sept. 2014X One, Inc.Methods and apparatuses for transmission of an alert to multiple devices
US8850310 *11 oct. 201130 sept. 2014Microsoft CorporationData entry suggestion lists for designated document data entry areas based on data from other document data entry areas
US8856115 *6 déc. 20107 oct. 2014Google Inc.Framework for suggesting search terms
US8856375 *14 sept. 20127 oct. 2014Yahoo! Inc.System and method for distributing media related to a location
US88924958 janv. 201318 nov. 2014Blanding Hovenweep, LlcAdaptive pattern recognition based controller apparatus and method and human-interface therefore
US891434212 août 200916 déc. 2014Yahoo! Inc.Personal data platform
US892414430 janv. 201230 déc. 2014Apple Inc.Location based tracking
US893034013 sept. 20126 janv. 2015Google Inc.Blending content in an output
US8938432 *1 août 200620 janv. 2015Allstate Insurance CompanyRetail deployment model
US8949212 *8 juil. 20113 févr. 2015Hariharan DhandapaniLocation-based informaton display
US8965787 *18 juin 200824 févr. 2015Smooth Productions Inc.Communications system and method for serving electronic content
US896588426 nov. 201324 févr. 2015Google Inc.Entity display priority in a distributed geographic information system
US897729412 nov. 200710 mars 2015Apple Inc.Securely locating a device
US90315817 nov. 201412 mai 2015X One, Inc.Apparatus and method for obtaining content on a cellular wireless device based on proximity to other wireless devices
US904335130 janv. 201326 mai 2015A9.Com, Inc.Determining search query specificity
US906619927 juin 200823 juin 2015Apple Inc.Location-aware mobile device
US909245427 juin 200828 juil. 2015Microsoft Technology Licensing, LlcDiscovering co-located queries in geographic search logs
US910990425 janv. 200818 août 2015Apple Inc.Integration of map services and user applications in a mobile device
US911090322 nov. 200618 août 2015Yahoo! Inc.Method, system and apparatus for using user profile electronic device data in media delivery
US913134230 avr. 20148 sept. 2015Apple Inc.Location-based categorical information services
US915879424 mai 201313 oct. 2015Google Inc.System and method for presentation of media related to a context
US9165038 *29 mai 201420 oct. 2015Google Inc.Interpreting adjacent search terms based on a hierarchical relationship
US916755812 juin 201420 oct. 2015X One, Inc.Methods and systems for sharing position data between subscribers involving multiple wireless providers
US91855227 nov. 201410 nov. 2015X One, Inc.Apparatus and method to transmit content to a cellular wireless device based on proximity to other wireless devices
US92241722 déc. 200829 déc. 2015Yahoo! Inc.Customizable content for distribution in social networks
US925009212 mai 20082 févr. 2016Apple Inc.Map service with network-based query for search
US925361624 mars 20152 févr. 2016X One, Inc.Apparatus and method for obtaining content on a cellular wireless device based on proximity
US92624392 déc. 201316 févr. 2016Yahoo! Inc.System for determining local intent in a search query
US92863575 janv. 201515 mars 2016Google Inc.Blending content in an output
US9305102 *27 févr. 20135 avr. 2016Google Inc.Systems and methods for providing personalized search results based on prior user interactions
US931020629 déc. 201412 avr. 2016Apple Inc.Location based tracking
US932407818 juin 200826 avr. 2016SMOOTH PRODUCTIONS, Inc.Dynamic social network system
US9348925 *16 juin 201124 mai 2016Google Inc.Locally significant search queries
US940077526 août 201426 juil. 2016Microsoft Technology Licensing, LlcDocument data entry suggestions
US941419822 juin 20159 août 2016Apple Inc.Location-aware mobile device
US94678325 sept. 201411 oct. 2016X One, Inc.Methods and systems for temporarily sharing position data between mobile-device users
US9471625 *8 janv. 201318 oct. 2016Google Inc.Dynamic view-based data layer in a geographic information system
US948376715 juil. 20111 nov. 2016Allstate Insurance CompanyRetail location services
US949758722 juil. 201415 nov. 2016Samsung Electronics Co., LtdMethod and apparatus for providing internet service based on user's location information in a communication system
US950777819 mai 200629 nov. 2016Yahoo! Inc.Summarization of media object collections
US953556312 nov. 20133 janv. 2017Blanding Hovenweep, LlcInternet appliance system and method
US957862129 avr. 201621 févr. 2017Apple Inc.Location aware mobile device
US958496023 déc. 201328 févr. 2017X One, Inc.Rendez vous management using mobile phones or other mobile devices
US960048430 sept. 200821 mars 2017Excalibur Ip, LlcSystem and method for reporting and analysis of media consumption data
US961520422 juil. 20154 avr. 2017X One, Inc.Techniques for communication within closed groups of mobile devices
US961981625 juil. 201411 avr. 2017Allstate Insurance CompanyRetail deployment model
US96266854 janv. 200818 avr. 2017Excalibur Ip, LlcSystems and methods of mapping attention
US9639861 *23 juil. 20152 mai 2017Textsoft, IncMessaging with greeting card and gift option
US9652547 *15 sept. 201416 mai 2017Google Inc.Framework for suggesting search terms
US965492120 sept. 201616 mai 2017X One, Inc.Techniques for sharing position data between first and second devices
US970270922 févr. 201311 juil. 2017Apple Inc.Disfavored route progressions or locations
US970272121 janv. 201611 juil. 2017Apple Inc.Map service with network-based query for search
US97063454 janv. 200811 juil. 2017Excalibur Ip, LlcInterest mapping system
US971553023 févr. 201525 juil. 2017Google Inc.Entity display priority in a distributed geographic information system
US973661816 juil. 201515 août 2017X One, Inc.Techniques for sharing relative position between mobile devices
US974979012 janv. 201729 août 2017X One, Inc.Rendez vous management using mobile phones or other mobile devices
US9767185 *2 oct. 201219 sept. 2017Oath Inc.Methods and systems for identifying local search queries
US978564822 déc. 201610 oct. 2017Google Inc.Entity display priority in a distributed geographic information system
US980512318 nov. 200831 oct. 2017Excalibur Ip, LlcSystem and method for data privacy in URL based context queries
US98543949 févr. 201726 déc. 2017X One, Inc.Ad hoc location sharing group between first and second cellular wireless devices
US985440227 janv. 201726 déc. 2017X One, Inc.Formation of wireless device location sharing group
US20060149734 *30 déc. 20046 juil. 2006Daniel EgnorLocation extraction
US20060242128 *1 mars 200626 oct. 2006Surendra GoelSearching content on web pages
US20070143345 *11 oct. 200621 juin 2007Jones Michael TEntity display priority in a distributed geographic information system
US20070164782 *17 janv. 200619 juil. 2007Microsoft CorporationMulti-word word wheeling
US20070168469 *17 janv. 200619 juil. 2007Microsoft CorporationServer side search with multi-word word wheeling and wildcard expansion
US20070192347 *1 août 200616 août 2007Allstate Insurance CompanyRetail Deployment Model
US20070255552 *30 nov. 20061 nov. 2007Microsoft CorporationDemographic based classification for local word wheeling/web search
US20070257792 *5 juin 20078 nov. 2007Gold Steven KBrand Mapping
US20080021874 *18 juil. 200624 janv. 2008Dahl Austin DSearching for transient streaming multimedia resources
US20080080442 *1 oct. 20073 avr. 2008Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.Method and apparatus for providing internet service based on user's location information in a communication system
US20080120308 *22 nov. 200622 mai 2008Ronald MartinezMethods, Systems and Apparatus for Delivery of Media
US20080140519 *8 déc. 200612 juin 2008Microsoft CorporationAdvertising based on simplified input expansion
US20080140806 *12 déc. 200612 juin 2008Yahoo! Inc.Configuring a search engine results page with environment-specific information
US20080148175 *15 déc. 200619 juin 2008Yahoo! Inc.Visualizing location-based datasets using "tag maps"
US20080222119 *8 mars 200711 sept. 2008Microsoft CorporationDetecting a user's location, local intent and travel intent from search queries
US20080243611 *28 mars 20072 oct. 2008Yahoo! Inc.System for determining local intent in a search query
US20080243783 *28 mars 20072 oct. 2008Yahoo! Inc.System for determining the geographic range of local intent in a search query
US20080243906 *26 juin 20072 oct. 2008Keith PetersOnline system and method for providing geographic presentations of localities that are pertinent to a text item
US20080307053 *1 nov. 200711 déc. 2008Mitnick Craig RSystem and Method for Permitting Geographically-Pertinent Information to be Ranked by Users According to Users' Geographic Proximity to Information and to Each Other for Affecting the Ranking of Such Information
US20080320010 *14 mai 200725 déc. 2008Microsoft CorporationSensitive webpage content detection
US20090005076 *28 déc. 20071 janv. 2009Scott ForstallLocation-Based Information Services
US20090024452 *25 sept. 200822 janv. 2009Ronald MartinezMethods, systems and apparatus for delivery of media
US20090063646 *2 sept. 20085 mars 2009Nixle, LlcSystem and method for collecting and organizing popular near real-time data in a virtual geographic grid
US20090157658 *18 juin 200818 juin 2009Bonev RobertCommunications system and method for serving electronic content
US20090157693 *18 juin 200818 juin 2009Palahnuk Samuel LouisDynamic social network system
US20090177644 *4 janv. 20089 juil. 2009Ronald MartinezSystems and methods of mapping attention
US20090177655 *10 mars 20099 juil. 2009Aol LlcCategory searching
US20090182631 *25 juil. 200816 juil. 2009Yahoo! Inc.System and method for word-of-mouth advertising
US20090219209 *29 févr. 20083 sept. 2009Apple Inc.Location determination
US20090234814 *17 févr. 200917 sept. 2009Marco BoerriesConfiguring a search engine results page with environment-specific information
US20090234815 *17 févr. 200917 sept. 2009Marco BoerriesOpen framework for integrating, associating, and interacting with content objects including automatic feed creation
US20090240564 *17 févr. 200924 sept. 2009Marco BoerriesOpen framework for integrating, associating, and interacting with content objects including advertisement and content personalization
US20090248663 *31 mars 20081 oct. 2009Microsoft CorporationOnline target location detection
US20090248738 *31 mars 20081 oct. 2009Ronald MartinezSystem and method for modeling relationships between entities
US20090258660 *15 avr. 200815 oct. 2009Apple Inc.Location determination using formula
US20090259679 *14 avr. 200815 oct. 2009Microsoft CorporationParsimonious multi-resolution value-item lists
US20090265388 *27 juin 200822 oct. 2009Microsoft CorporationDiscovering co-located queries in geographic search logs
US20090299796 *30 mai 20083 déc. 2009Microsoft CorporationConfiguration of resources for an entity
US20090328087 *27 juin 200831 déc. 2009Yahoo! Inc.System and method for location based media delivery
US20100030870 *29 juil. 20084 févr. 2010Yahoo! Inc.Region and duration uniform resource identifiers (uri) for media objects
US20100077017 *19 sept. 200825 mars 2010Yahoo! Inc.System and method for distributing media related to a location
US20100082436 *30 sept. 20081 avr. 2010Yahoo! Inc.Search results for local versus traveler
US20100161591 *22 déc. 200824 juin 2010Rosie JonesSystem and method of geo-based prediction in search result selection
US20100161600 *19 déc. 200824 juin 2010Yahoo! Inc.System and method for automated service recommendations
US20100174703 *7 janv. 20098 juil. 2010Microsoft CorporationRelevance improvements for implicit local queries
US20100281011 *12 juil. 20104 nov. 2010Yahoo! Inc.System for determining the geographic range of local intent in a search query
US20100299200 *20 mai 201025 nov. 2010Yahoo! Inc.System for identifying geographically relevant advertisements from a search query
US20110125743 *23 nov. 200926 mai 2011Nokia CorporationMethod and apparatus for providing a contextual model based upon user context data
US20110179078 *1 avr. 201121 juil. 2011Marco BoerriesOpen Framework for Integrating, Associating, and Interacting with Content Objects
US20130018897 *14 sept. 201217 janv. 2013Yahoo! Inc.System and method for distributing media related to a location
US20130054585 *23 août 201128 févr. 2013Microsoft CorporationGeographic search with mixed-precision results
US20130091411 *11 oct. 201111 avr. 2013Microsoft CorporationDocument data entry suggestions
US20130132375 *8 janv. 201323 mai 2013Google Inc.Dynamic View-Based Data Layer in a Geographic Information System
US20140095532 *2 oct. 20123 avr. 2014Aol Inc.Methods and Systems for Identifying Local Search Queries
US20140172843 *16 juin 201119 juin 2014Google Inc.Locally Significant Search Queries
US20140244634 *27 févr. 201328 août 2014Google Inc.Systems and Methods for Providing Personalized Search Results Based on Prior User Interactions
US20140379689 *15 sept. 201425 déc. 2014Google Inc.Framework for Suggesting Search Terms
US20150324858 *23 juil. 201512 nov. 2015Mark Anthony DeMatteiMessaging with greeting card and gift option
CN104572824A *4 déc. 201429 avr. 2015百度在线网络技术(北京)有限公司Method and device for searching information
EP2024880A1 *5 avr. 200718 févr. 2009Microsoft CorporationDemographic based classification for local word wheeling/web search
EP2024880A4 *5 avr. 200714 mars 2012Microsoft CorpDemographic based classification for local word wheeling/web search
WO2007133351A15 avr. 200722 nov. 2007Microsoft CorporationDemographic based classification for local word wheeling/web search
Classifications
Classification aux États-Unis1/1, 707/E17.11, 707/999.003
Classification internationaleG06F17/30
Classification coopérativeG06F17/3087
Classification européenneG06F17/30W1S
Événements juridiques
DateCodeÉvénementDescription
10 févr. 2005ASAssignment
Owner name: MICROSOFT CORPORATION, WASHINGTON
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:WANG, LEE;LI, YING;REEL/FRAME:015705/0056
Effective date: 20041207
15 janv. 2015ASAssignment
Owner name: MICROSOFT TECHNOLOGY LICENSING, LLC, WASHINGTON
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:MICROSOFT CORPORATION;REEL/FRAME:034766/0001
Effective date: 20141014