US20060274935A1 - Method for measuring registration of overlapping material layers of an integrated circuit - Google Patents
Method for measuring registration of overlapping material layers of an integrated circuit Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- US20060274935A1 US20060274935A1 US11/504,072 US50407206A US2006274935A1 US 20060274935 A1 US20060274935 A1 US 20060274935A1 US 50407206 A US50407206 A US 50407206A US 2006274935 A1 US2006274935 A1 US 2006274935A1
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- layers
- feature
- integrated circuit
- image
- registration
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Abandoned
Links
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 title abstract description 25
- 239000000463 material Substances 0.000 title description 19
- 230000003287 optical effect Effects 0.000 claims abstract description 6
- 238000003384 imaging method Methods 0.000 claims description 9
- 238000012545 processing Methods 0.000 claims description 6
- 238000013461 design Methods 0.000 claims description 2
- 239000004065 semiconductor Substances 0.000 abstract description 22
- 235000012431 wafers Nutrition 0.000 description 30
- 238000005259 measurement Methods 0.000 description 5
- 238000004626 scanning electron microscopy Methods 0.000 description 5
- 238000006073 displacement reaction Methods 0.000 description 4
- 229920002120 photoresistant polymer Polymers 0.000 description 4
- 239000000758 substrate Substances 0.000 description 4
- 238000004519 manufacturing process Methods 0.000 description 3
- XUIMIQQOPSSXEZ-UHFFFAOYSA-N Silicon Chemical compound [Si] XUIMIQQOPSSXEZ-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 230000002950 deficient Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000010586 diagram Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000000399 optical microscopy Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000000206 photolithography Methods 0.000 description 2
- 229910052710 silicon Inorganic materials 0.000 description 2
- 239000010703 silicon Substances 0.000 description 2
- 230000004075 alteration Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000004458 analytical method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000015572 biosynthetic process Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000011109 contamination Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000001419 dependent effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000008021 deposition Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000005137 deposition process Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000010894 electron beam technology Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000005530 etching Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000007689 inspection Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000011835 investigation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000012544 monitoring process Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000000059 patterning Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000006467 substitution reaction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000009897 systematic effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000012795 verification Methods 0.000 description 1
Images
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06T—IMAGE DATA PROCESSING OR GENERATION, IN GENERAL
- G06T7/00—Image analysis
- G06T7/30—Determination of transform parameters for the alignment of images, i.e. image registration
- G06T7/33—Determination of transform parameters for the alignment of images, i.e. image registration using feature-based methods
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06T—IMAGE DATA PROCESSING OR GENERATION, IN GENERAL
- G06T2207/00—Indexing scheme for image analysis or image enhancement
- G06T2207/30—Subject of image; Context of image processing
- G06T2207/30108—Industrial image inspection
- G06T2207/30148—Semiconductor; IC; Wafer
Definitions
- the present invention relates to semiconductor processing, and in particular, to a method for measuring the registration between two or more integrated circuit layers.
- Semiconductor-based integrated circuits are typically manufactured through the formation of a set of layers on a wafer containing many integrated circuit areas that are later separated into individual dies. Very thin layers of material are deposited one on top of the other in patterns and processed to form integrated circuit components.
- One technique of deposition and patterning is photolithography where a material layer is first coated with a light-sensitive photoresist. The photoresist is exposed through a pattern mask of a desired circuit pattern. Depending upon the type of photoresist used, the exposed photoresist is developed to remove either the exposed or unexposed resist. Etching and/or deposition processes are then used to create the desired circuit within the pattern created.
- the pattern mask should be precisely aligned on a wafer during processing.
- the overlay of the mask the measure of how accurately the pattern mask is aligned, will often determine whether the wafer will be functional or must be discarded. Because each wafer may undergo numerous photolithography processing steps, the alignment of each pattern mask, especially the last ones used, is dependant upon the correct alignment of earlier masks. Poor overlay may destroy the intended electrical properties of a circuit device on a wafer.
- a common practice in registration, or matching in position, of overlying layers in a semiconductor wafer is to use metrology structures such as registration patterns or marks in each layer of the wafer in regions outside of a circuit region.
- the box-in-box registration pattern is commonly used today.
- This technique employs squares of different sizes on the layers to be registered. When the two layers are exactly matched in position, or registered, the squares are concentric. Any registration error produces a displacement of the squares relative to each other.
- four box-in-box alignments are typically performed simultaneously, with the boxes located at the four corners of the image field.
- registration errors can be measured by a process in which an image of a set of registration patterns, such as box-in-box, recorded by a video camera through a microscope, are processed to obtain a measurement of the registration error.
- the present invention provides a method and apparatus that overcome some of the problems associated with registration measurements.
- the present invention utilizes optical or scanning electron microscopy images of two or more overlying integrated circuit layers.
- the portion of the integrated circuit layers that is imaged contains the actual operative circuitry of the chip.
- the respective images are digitized and the digitized patterns are further analyzed for the relative placement of the two layers.
- the measured offset of predetermined features in the layers can then be compared to a database containing previously computed data for what the feature offset should be in the two layers.
- the difference between the imaged and the ideal placement, if outside a tolerable limit, is then used to correct processing errors or inefficiencies in the subsequent fabrication of other wafers.
- FIG. 1 illustrates a registration measurement system according to one embodiment of the present invention.
- FIG. 2 is a block diagram of the illustration of FIG. 1 .
- FIG. 3 is a flow diagram of the registration steps in accordance with the present invention.
- FIG. 4 represents features of such overlying material layers in a semiconductor device which is useful in explaining the invention.
- FIG. 5 illustrates an aerial image 2 D contour of the overlying material layers of FIG. 4 .
- the present invention provides a method for measuring registration between overlying layers of a semiconductor wafer.
- the registration method measures the displacement of the actual patterns on the scanned semiconductor layers, rather than that of metrology structures such as, for example, the set box-in-box pattern.
- the present invention is implemented in a semiconductor device imaging system 100 , an exemplary one being shown in FIGS. 1 and 2 .
- the system 100 includes a prealigner 142 for handling cassette wafer holder 140 , an automated imaging system 146 , an image processor 148 , and a computer 150 which further comprises one or more processors and associated memory, an image monitor 152 , a text screen 154 , a keyboard 156 , and a disk drive 158 .
- cassette wafer holder 140 contains semiconductor wafers to be measured and is mounted on system 100 .
- a wafer transport system or a wafer handler removes a semiconductor silicon wafer 10 from cassette 140 and places it on prealigner 142 .
- a typical wafer transport system is a model CKG 1 or CKG 3 available from FSI.
- Semiconductor wafer 10 has a given size, typically ranging from 75 mm (3 inches) to 200 mm (8 inches) in diameter.
- the wafer transport system further transfers semiconductor silicon wafer 10 from the prealigner 142 onto stage 118 .
- Stage 118 can move in three dimensions and permits the positioning of semiconductor wafer 10 relative to the automated imaging system 146 .
- Stage 118 may be any conventional device, such as a piezoelectrically driven stage, that provides precise movement over a broad range of distances.
- the automated imaging system 146 may be either an optical system or a scanning electron microscope (SEM), both being used in the present invention for generating aerial images of wafer 10 .
- SEM scanning electron microscope
- the optical system could include a microscope and a video camera positioned above semiconductor wafer 10 .
- the microscope could carry objectives ranging in power from 2.5 ⁇ to 200 ⁇ magnification.
- the microscope of the optical system could be a Zeiss Axiotron type and the video camera a Dage MT168 series.
- the present invention could use a scanning electron microscope (SEM) as the imaging system 146 .
- SEM scanning electron microscope
- a conventional SEM focuses an emitted electron beam toward the semiconductor wafer 10 .
- step 202 begins with the automated imaging system 146 taking a top-down image of a semiconductor wafer 10 at a predetermined step in the fabrication process and at a predetermined area of the circuit which may be user selectable.
- This image includes features of two or more layers of the wafer combined in a single top-down image.
- two material layers, a first and a second, are imaged.
- the first individual layer will have at least one predetermined featured reference point in the image.
- the reference point might be the radial center of the radius of curvature of the feature or it could be a predetermined location along the edge of the feature.
- the reference point could also be a centroid of a feature or have some other spatial relationship to one or more features of the layer.
- the second individual layer, which overlies the first will also have a predetermined feature reference point in the image.
- FIG. 4 is a simplified drawing illustrating respective features 301 and 303 in two overlaid material layers in the aerial image.
- a predetermined feature reference point for feature 301 can be the center point 305
- a predetermined feature reference point for feature 303 can be a radial center point 307 .
- FIG. 4 shows positions of two features, each having an associated reference point, it should be appreciated that additional features and associated reference points can be used in each material layer, as exemplified in the aerial image taken in FIG. 5 . Also, although FIG. 3 shows one reference point for each feature, it should be apparent that multiple reference points can be used for each feature of each layer.
- the degree of alignment of the two layers is represented by the degree of alignment of the feature reference points. Taking the example shown in FIG. 4 , if the two featured reference points 305 and 307 are supposed to overlap when the material layer containing feature 301 is properly aligned with the material layer containing feature 303 , the degree of non-overlap of the reference points in the X and Y directions of a rectangular coordinate system represents the degree of misalignment of the two layers. That is, the values ⁇ x and ⁇ y in FIG. 4 represent the degree of misalignment of the two layers.
- step 204 the feature reference points in the two material layers are located.
- the reference points can be located by an analysis of the images captured themselves that is, taking FIG. 3 as an example, computer 150 takes the image from image processor 148 and finds the center points 305 and 307 of the respective features 301 and 303 of the two overlapping material layers. Once the reference points are located the process proceeds to step 206 , where the relative locations of those reference points in an ideal wafer is used as a basis for comparison with the actual locations of the featured reference points found in step 204 .
- the ideal relationship of the compared feature points can be found in the original design specifications for the circuit portion under examination, or can be found from a previously imaged circuit where the reference points were in perfect alignment. In either case, at step 206 the computer determines whether the featured points, for example, 305 and 307 in FIG. 3 , are in the proper relationship, which would indicate proper alignment of the two material layers. If the two featured reference points are not in the alignment they are supposed to be in, as determined from the database or ideal image, the degree of offset of the two is noted in a rectangular coordinate system and represented by a ⁇ x and ⁇ y value from where these two reference points are supposed to be located.
- the reference points 305 and 307 are supposed to exactly overlap so that the degree of offset is easily represented by a ⁇ x and ⁇ y value.
- This ⁇ x and ⁇ y value represents then the degree of offset between the two material layers.
- step 208 determines whether any offset that has been determined between the reference feature points is within a tolerable limit. If not, a registration error is indicated in step 206 and the magnitude of that error is noted. This can be in the form of a computer record which is generated, as well as an image presented on the image monitor 152 showing the degree of error on an actual depiction of the image under investigation. Likewise, an offset of this magnitude can be displayed on text screen 154 and recorded on a recording medium by disc drive 158 .
- step 212 the process determines whether there are other areas of interest on the captured image that need examination. If so, the process proceeds from step 212 back to step 202 , and another area of the image under consideration is then inspected and the process steps repeated. If at step 212 there are no other areas of interest for examination, the process proceeds to an end step 214 .
- the invention allows for a determination of a degree of misalignment of overlapped layers of an integrated circuit by actual inspection of an image showing the overlapped areas with a determination of the degree of alignment or misalignment, which is based on reference points provided in each of the two layers.
- the degree of misregistration of overlying layers can be directly determined rather than inferentially determined in a quick and efficient manner, and can be used whenever overlapping registration is a criticality in material layers of an integrated circuit under fabrication.
- the present invention can be used for any overlapping material layers at any area or site in a field of an IC as long as the examined area contains features from both layers which are in the obtained images, the locations of which can be identified by associated feature reference points.
Abstract
A method and apparatus for measuring registration between two or more integrated circuit layers is disclosed. Images of actual operative circuitry of different layers of a semiconductor wafer, obtained by an optical technique or a scanning electron microscope, are digitized and analyzed for the relative placement of pattern shapes of the corresponding layers. This relative placement is then compared to tolerance values and if out of tolerance misregistration of the two layers is indicated.
Description
- The present invention relates to semiconductor processing, and in particular, to a method for measuring the registration between two or more integrated circuit layers.
- Semiconductor-based integrated circuits are typically manufactured through the formation of a set of layers on a wafer containing many integrated circuit areas that are later separated into individual dies. Very thin layers of material are deposited one on top of the other in patterns and processed to form integrated circuit components.
- One technique of deposition and patterning is photolithography where a material layer is first coated with a light-sensitive photoresist. The photoresist is exposed through a pattern mask of a desired circuit pattern. Depending upon the type of photoresist used, the exposed photoresist is developed to remove either the exposed or unexposed resist. Etching and/or deposition processes are then used to create the desired circuit within the pattern created.
- In most cases, the pattern mask should be precisely aligned on a wafer during processing. The overlay of the mask, the measure of how accurately the pattern mask is aligned, will often determine whether the wafer will be functional or must be discarded. Because each wafer may undergo numerous photolithography processing steps, the alignment of each pattern mask, especially the last ones used, is dependant upon the correct alignment of earlier masks. Poor overlay may destroy the intended electrical properties of a circuit device on a wafer.
- A common practice in registration, or matching in position, of overlying layers in a semiconductor wafer is to use metrology structures such as registration patterns or marks in each layer of the wafer in regions outside of a circuit region. In particular, the box-in-box registration pattern is commonly used today. This technique employs squares of different sizes on the layers to be registered. When the two layers are exactly matched in position, or registered, the squares are concentric. Any registration error produces a displacement of the squares relative to each other. To ensure ideal registration between masks, four box-in-box alignments are typically performed simultaneously, with the boxes located at the four corners of the image field.
- Since semiconductor devices are expensive to fabricate, it is desirable to verify registration after the application of each layer. If the displacement of the layers is outside tolerable limits, sometimes the defective layer can be removed or replaced with an accurately registered layer. In other cases, the substrate is discarded so that further processing steps are not performed on a defective substrate. In any event, significant registration errors must be noted and corrected, otherwise subsequently fabricated wafers would likely have the same registration errors.
- In the prior art, monitoring and verification of registration was done manually. Laboratory operators using microscopes examined the registration of overlying layers on each semiconductor wafer. Unavoidably, this technique was slow, subject to human errors and capable of producing substrate contamination.
- Recently, the registration of overlying layers has been measured by automated systems, such as optical microscopy and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). For example, registration errors can be measured by a process in which an image of a set of registration patterns, such as box-in-box, recorded by a video camera through a microscope, are processed to obtain a measurement of the registration error.
- As feature sizes and the alignment requirements of semiconductor devices shrink, the lens distortion of the exposure system has a larger impact on the alignment budget. Alignment errors due to lens distortions have been shown to be dependent on feature size and pitch. This size and pitch dependency can induce a measured alignment offset difference between the standard box-in-box method and the actual circuit layers of interest.
- Accordingly, a method for measuring displacement between layers of a semiconductor wafer, which is inexpensive to implement, fast in operation and simple to automate is needed. There is also a need for a method that allows accurate measurement of layer registration errors, while avoiding the systematic errors associated with the prior art measurement systems.
- The present invention provides a method and apparatus that overcome some of the problems associated with registration measurements.
- The present invention utilizes optical or scanning electron microscopy images of two or more overlying integrated circuit layers. The portion of the integrated circuit layers that is imaged contains the actual operative circuitry of the chip. The respective images are digitized and the digitized patterns are further analyzed for the relative placement of the two layers. The measured offset of predetermined features in the layers can then be compared to a database containing previously computed data for what the feature offset should be in the two layers. The difference between the imaged and the ideal placement, if outside a tolerable limit, is then used to correct processing errors or inefficiencies in the subsequent fabrication of other wafers.
- The above and other advantages and features of the present invention will be better understood from the following detailed description of the preferred embodiment which is provided in connection with the accompanying drawings.
-
FIG. 1 illustrates a registration measurement system according to one embodiment of the present invention. -
FIG. 2 is a block diagram of the illustration ofFIG. 1 . -
FIG. 3 is a flow diagram of the registration steps in accordance with the present invention. -
FIG. 4 represents features of such overlying material layers in a semiconductor device which is useful in explaining the invention. -
FIG. 5 illustrates anaerial image 2D contour of the overlying material layers ofFIG. 4 . - In the following detailed description, reference is made to various specific embodiments in which the invention may be practiced. These embodiments are described with sufficient detail to enable those skilled in the art to practice the invention, and it is to be understood that other embodiments may be employed, and that structural, electrical and methodology changes may be made without departing from the invention. Accordingly, the following detailed description is not to be taken in a limiting sense and the scope of the present invention is defined by the appended claims.
- The present invention provides a method for measuring registration between overlying layers of a semiconductor wafer. The registration method measures the displacement of the actual patterns on the scanned semiconductor layers, rather than that of metrology structures such as, for example, the set box-in-box pattern.
- The present invention is implemented in a semiconductor
device imaging system 100, an exemplary one being shown inFIGS. 1 and 2 . Thesystem 100 includes aprealigner 142 for handlingcassette wafer holder 140, anautomated imaging system 146, animage processor 148, and acomputer 150 which further comprises one or more processors and associated memory, animage monitor 152, atext screen 154, akeyboard 156, and adisk drive 158. - As illustrated in
FIGS. 1 and 2 ,cassette wafer holder 140 contains semiconductor wafers to be measured and is mounted onsystem 100. A wafer transport system or a wafer handler (not shown) removes asemiconductor silicon wafer 10 fromcassette 140 and places it onprealigner 142. A typical wafer transport system is a model CKG1 or CKG3 available from FSI.Semiconductor wafer 10 has a given size, typically ranging from 75 mm (3 inches) to 200 mm (8 inches) in diameter. - The wafer transport system further transfers semiconductor silicon wafer 10 from the
prealigner 142 ontostage 118.Stage 118 can move in three dimensions and permits the positioning ofsemiconductor wafer 10 relative to theautomated imaging system 146.Stage 118 may be any conventional device, such as a piezoelectrically driven stage, that provides precise movement over a broad range of distances. - The
automated imaging system 146 may be either an optical system or a scanning electron microscope (SEM), both being used in the present invention for generating aerial images ofwafer 10. - The optical system could include a microscope and a video camera positioned above
semiconductor wafer 10. The microscope could carry objectives ranging in power from 2.5× to 200× magnification. For example, the microscope of the optical system could be a Zeiss Axiotron type and the video camera a Dage MT168 series. - Similarly, the present invention could use a scanning electron microscope (SEM) as the
imaging system 146. As described in the background section of this application, a conventional SEM focuses an emitted electron beam toward thesemiconductor wafer 10. - Referring now to
FIG. 3 , a process for measuring material layer registration in a semiconductor device using the equipment shown inFIGS. 1 and 2 will now be described. After a system initialization at step 200,step 202 begins with theautomated imaging system 146 taking a top-down image of asemiconductor wafer 10 at a predetermined step in the fabrication process and at a predetermined area of the circuit which may be user selectable. This image includes features of two or more layers of the wafer combined in a single top-down image. For purposes of simplification, we will assume that two material layers, a first and a second, are imaged. The first individual layer will have at least one predetermined featured reference point in the image. - For example, if the printed feature is a circular feature, the reference point might be the radial center of the radius of curvature of the feature or it could be a predetermined location along the edge of the feature. The reference point could also be a centroid of a feature or have some other spatial relationship to one or more features of the layer. Likewise, the second individual layer, which overlies the first will also have a predetermined feature reference point in the image.
FIG. 4 is a simplified drawing illustratingrespective features feature 301 can be thecenter point 305, while a predetermined feature reference point forfeature 303 can be aradial center point 307. - Although
FIG. 4 shows positions of two features, each having an associated reference point, it should be appreciated that additional features and associated reference points can be used in each material layer, as exemplified in the aerial image taken inFIG. 5 . Also, althoughFIG. 3 shows one reference point for each feature, it should be apparent that multiple reference points can be used for each feature of each layer. - The degree of alignment of the two layers is represented by the degree of alignment of the feature reference points. Taking the example shown in
FIG. 4 , if the two featuredreference points layer containing feature 301 is properly aligned with the materiallayer containing feature 303, the degree of non-overlap of the reference points in the X and Y directions of a rectangular coordinate system represents the degree of misalignment of the two layers. That is, the values Δx and Δy inFIG. 4 represent the degree of misalignment of the two layers. - Following the capture of a top-down image of at least two overlying material layers in
step 202, the process proceeds to step 204 where the feature reference points in the two material layers are located. The reference points can be located by an analysis of the images captured themselves that is, takingFIG. 3 as an example,computer 150 takes the image fromimage processor 148 and finds the center points 305 and 307 of therespective features step 204. - The ideal relationship of the compared feature points can be found in the original design specifications for the circuit portion under examination, or can be found from a previously imaged circuit where the reference points were in perfect alignment. In either case, at
step 206 the computer determines whether the featured points, for example, 305 and 307 inFIG. 3 , are in the proper relationship, which would indicate proper alignment of the two material layers. If the two featured reference points are not in the alignment they are supposed to be in, as determined from the database or ideal image, the degree of offset of the two is noted in a rectangular coordinate system and represented by a Δx and Δy value from where these two reference points are supposed to be located. - In
FIG. 4 , for example, thereference points - The process then proceeds to step 208 to determine whether any offset that has been determined between the reference feature points is within a tolerable limit. If not, a registration error is indicated in
step 206 and the magnitude of that error is noted. This can be in the form of a computer record which is generated, as well as an image presented on the image monitor 152 showing the degree of error on an actual depiction of the image under investigation. Likewise, an offset of this magnitude can be displayed ontext screen 154 and recorded on a recording medium bydisc drive 158. - If the featured reference points are within tolerable limits of
step 208, and in any event oncestep 210 is completed, the process returns to step 212 where the process determines whether there are other areas of interest on the captured image that need examination. If so, the process proceeds fromstep 212 back to step 202, and another area of the image under consideration is then inspected and the process steps repeated. If atstep 212 there are no other areas of interest for examination, the process proceeds to anend step 214. - Thus, the invention allows for a determination of a degree of misalignment of overlapped layers of an integrated circuit by actual inspection of an image showing the overlapped areas with a determination of the degree of alignment or misalignment, which is based on reference points provided in each of the two layers. As a consequence, the degree of misregistration of overlying layers can be directly determined rather than inferentially determined in a quick and efficient manner, and can be used whenever overlapping registration is a criticality in material layers of an integrated circuit under fabrication.
- It should be readily apparent that the present invention can be used for any overlapping material layers at any area or site in a field of an IC as long as the examined area contains features from both layers which are in the obtained images, the locations of which can be identified by associated feature reference points.
- While the invention has been described in detail with reference to semiconductor wafers, it should be readily apparent that the present invention can be used with other substrates having overlapping material layers as well.
- While the invention has been described in detail in connection with the preferred embodiments known at the time, it should be readily understood that the invention is not limited to such disclosed embodiments. Rather, the invention can be modified to incorporate any number of variations, alterations, substitutions or equivalent arrangements not described here, but which are commensurate with the spirit and scope of the invention. Accordingly, the invention is not to be seen as limited by the foregoing description, but is only limited by the scope of the appended claims.
- What is claimed as new and desired to be protected by Letters Patent of the United States is:
Claims (10)
1-39. (canceled)
40. A system for measuring the registration between at least two integrated circuit layers, one residing over the other, the system comprising:
an imaging system for generating a top-down field of the at least two integrated circuit layers, each of the layers having a respective visible feature in the image;
an image processor for digitizing the image;
a computer for processing the digitized image to determine a location of a first feature reference point in the visible feature of one of the layers, and allocation of a second feature reference point in the visible feature of the other of the layers, to indicate a relative location of the visible feature of one of the layers, relative to the visible feature of the other of the layers, wherein at least one of the visible features is a non-metrological structure on the one of the integrated circuit layers and for determining if the relative location is within acceptable design limits for the integrated circuit layers.
41. The system of claim 40 , wherein the computer further determines an x-axis value, X1, and a y-axis value, Y1.
42. The system of claim 40 , wherein the computer further determines an x-axis value, X2, and a y-axis value, Y2.
43. The system of claim 40 , wherein the computer further determines an x-axis value, Δx, and a y-axis value, Δy, wherein:
Δx−X1−X2; and
Δy−Y1−Y2.
44. The system of claim 40 , wherein the computer further compares said relative location to a stored data having reference locations and tolerable limits.
45. The system of claim 44 , wherein the computer further calculates an offset value.
46. The system of claim 45 , wherein the computer further compares the offset value to a predetermined tolerance.
47. The system of claim 40 , wherein the imaging system includes a scanning electron microscope.
48. The system of claim 40 , wherein the imaging system includes an optical system.
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US11/504,072 US20060274935A1 (en) | 2000-03-01 | 2006-08-15 | Method for measuring registration of overlapping material layers of an integrated circuit |
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US09/516,581 US7095885B1 (en) | 2000-03-01 | 2000-03-01 | Method for measuring registration of overlapping material layers of an integrated circuit |
US11/504,072 US20060274935A1 (en) | 2000-03-01 | 2006-08-15 | Method for measuring registration of overlapping material layers of an integrated circuit |
Related Parent Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US09/516,581 Division US7095885B1 (en) | 2000-03-01 | 2000-03-01 | Method for measuring registration of overlapping material layers of an integrated circuit |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
US20060274935A1 true US20060274935A1 (en) | 2006-12-07 |
Family
ID=36821782
Family Applications (3)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US09/516,581 Expired - Fee Related US7095885B1 (en) | 2000-03-01 | 2000-03-01 | Method for measuring registration of overlapping material layers of an integrated circuit |
US11/446,145 Abandoned US20070019859A1 (en) | 2000-03-01 | 2006-06-05 | Method for measuring registration |
US11/504,072 Abandoned US20060274935A1 (en) | 2000-03-01 | 2006-08-15 | Method for measuring registration of overlapping material layers of an integrated circuit |
Family Applications Before (2)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US09/516,581 Expired - Fee Related US7095885B1 (en) | 2000-03-01 | 2000-03-01 | Method for measuring registration of overlapping material layers of an integrated circuit |
US11/446,145 Abandoned US20070019859A1 (en) | 2000-03-01 | 2006-06-05 | Method for measuring registration |
Country Status (1)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (3) | US7095885B1 (en) |
Families Citing this family (4)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US7734084B2 (en) * | 2006-10-20 | 2010-06-08 | Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. | Method and system for offset estimation and alignment |
US8923601B2 (en) * | 2009-04-30 | 2014-12-30 | Hermes Microvision Inc. | Method for inspecting overlay shift defect during semiconductor manufacturing and apparatus thereof |
US8050490B2 (en) * | 2009-04-30 | 2011-11-01 | Hermes Microvision, Inc. | Method for inspecting overlay shift defect during semiconductor manufacturing and apparatus thereof |
US9754895B1 (en) | 2016-03-07 | 2017-09-05 | Micron Technology, Inc. | Methods of forming semiconductor devices including determining misregistration between semiconductor levels and related apparatuses |
Citations (18)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US4766311A (en) * | 1984-03-20 | 1988-08-23 | Vickers Instruments (Canada) Inc. | Method and apparatus for precision SEM measurements |
US4772846A (en) * | 1986-12-29 | 1988-09-20 | Hughes Aircraft Company | Wafer alignment and positioning apparatus for chip testing by voltage contrast electron microscopy |
US4938600A (en) * | 1989-02-09 | 1990-07-03 | Interactive Video Systems, Inc. | Method and apparatus for measuring registration between layers of a semiconductor wafer |
US4989082A (en) * | 1988-07-29 | 1991-01-29 | Westinghouse Electric Corp. | Image processing system for comparing a test article with a master article to determine that an object is correctly located on the test article |
US5111406A (en) * | 1990-01-05 | 1992-05-05 | Nicolet Instrument Corporation | Method for determining drill target locations in a multilayer board panel |
US5298975A (en) * | 1991-09-27 | 1994-03-29 | International Business Machines Corporation | Combined scanning force microscope and optical metrology tool |
US5479252A (en) * | 1993-06-17 | 1995-12-26 | Ultrapointe Corporation | Laser imaging system for inspection and analysis of sub-micron particles |
US5498500A (en) * | 1993-12-27 | 1996-03-12 | Hyundai Electronics Industries Co., Ltd. | Overlay measurement mark and method of measuring an overlay error between multi patterns in a semiconductor device using the measurement mark |
US5608816A (en) * | 1993-12-24 | 1997-03-04 | Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. | Apparatus for inspecting a wiring pattern according to a micro-inspection and a macro-inspection performed in parallel |
US5617340A (en) * | 1994-04-28 | 1997-04-01 | The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of Commerce | Method and reference standards for measuring overlay in multilayer structures, and for calibrating imaging equipment as used in semiconductor manufacturing |
US5701013A (en) * | 1996-06-07 | 1997-12-23 | Mosel Viltelic, Inc. | Wafer metrology pattern integrating both overlay and critical dimension features for SEM or AFM measurements |
US5776645A (en) * | 1994-11-01 | 1998-07-07 | International Business Machines Corporation | Lithographic print bias/overlay target and applied metrology |
US5790254A (en) * | 1994-12-20 | 1998-08-04 | International Business Machines Corporation | Monitoring of minimum features on a substrate |
US5835225A (en) * | 1994-11-30 | 1998-11-10 | Micron Technology, Inc. | Surface properties detection by reflectance metrology |
US5847818A (en) * | 1997-07-16 | 1998-12-08 | Winbond Electronics Corp. | CD vernier apparatus for SEM CD measurement |
US5930382A (en) * | 1995-05-15 | 1999-07-27 | Hitachi, Ltd. | Wiring pattern inspecting method and system for carrying out the same |
US5987160A (en) * | 1997-04-02 | 1999-11-16 | Delco Electronics Corporation | Method and apparatus for inspecting a photoresist material by inducing and detecting fluorescence of the photoresist material |
US6068954A (en) * | 1998-09-01 | 2000-05-30 | Micron Technology, Inc. | Semiconductor wafer alignment methods |
-
2000
- 2000-03-01 US US09/516,581 patent/US7095885B1/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
-
2006
- 2006-06-05 US US11/446,145 patent/US20070019859A1/en not_active Abandoned
- 2006-08-15 US US11/504,072 patent/US20060274935A1/en not_active Abandoned
Patent Citations (18)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US4766311A (en) * | 1984-03-20 | 1988-08-23 | Vickers Instruments (Canada) Inc. | Method and apparatus for precision SEM measurements |
US4772846A (en) * | 1986-12-29 | 1988-09-20 | Hughes Aircraft Company | Wafer alignment and positioning apparatus for chip testing by voltage contrast electron microscopy |
US4989082A (en) * | 1988-07-29 | 1991-01-29 | Westinghouse Electric Corp. | Image processing system for comparing a test article with a master article to determine that an object is correctly located on the test article |
US4938600A (en) * | 1989-02-09 | 1990-07-03 | Interactive Video Systems, Inc. | Method and apparatus for measuring registration between layers of a semiconductor wafer |
US5111406A (en) * | 1990-01-05 | 1992-05-05 | Nicolet Instrument Corporation | Method for determining drill target locations in a multilayer board panel |
US5298975A (en) * | 1991-09-27 | 1994-03-29 | International Business Machines Corporation | Combined scanning force microscope and optical metrology tool |
US5479252A (en) * | 1993-06-17 | 1995-12-26 | Ultrapointe Corporation | Laser imaging system for inspection and analysis of sub-micron particles |
US5608816A (en) * | 1993-12-24 | 1997-03-04 | Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. | Apparatus for inspecting a wiring pattern according to a micro-inspection and a macro-inspection performed in parallel |
US5498500A (en) * | 1993-12-27 | 1996-03-12 | Hyundai Electronics Industries Co., Ltd. | Overlay measurement mark and method of measuring an overlay error between multi patterns in a semiconductor device using the measurement mark |
US5617340A (en) * | 1994-04-28 | 1997-04-01 | The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of Commerce | Method and reference standards for measuring overlay in multilayer structures, and for calibrating imaging equipment as used in semiconductor manufacturing |
US5776645A (en) * | 1994-11-01 | 1998-07-07 | International Business Machines Corporation | Lithographic print bias/overlay target and applied metrology |
US5835225A (en) * | 1994-11-30 | 1998-11-10 | Micron Technology, Inc. | Surface properties detection by reflectance metrology |
US5790254A (en) * | 1994-12-20 | 1998-08-04 | International Business Machines Corporation | Monitoring of minimum features on a substrate |
US5930382A (en) * | 1995-05-15 | 1999-07-27 | Hitachi, Ltd. | Wiring pattern inspecting method and system for carrying out the same |
US5701013A (en) * | 1996-06-07 | 1997-12-23 | Mosel Viltelic, Inc. | Wafer metrology pattern integrating both overlay and critical dimension features for SEM or AFM measurements |
US5987160A (en) * | 1997-04-02 | 1999-11-16 | Delco Electronics Corporation | Method and apparatus for inspecting a photoresist material by inducing and detecting fluorescence of the photoresist material |
US5847818A (en) * | 1997-07-16 | 1998-12-08 | Winbond Electronics Corp. | CD vernier apparatus for SEM CD measurement |
US6068954A (en) * | 1998-09-01 | 2000-05-30 | Micron Technology, Inc. | Semiconductor wafer alignment methods |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
US7095885B1 (en) | 2006-08-22 |
US20070019859A1 (en) | 2007-01-25 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
EP0457843B1 (en) | Method and apparatus for measuring registration between layers of a semiconductor wafer | |
JP4272862B2 (en) | Position detection method, position detection apparatus, and exposure apparatus | |
US8804137B2 (en) | Unique mark and method to determine critical dimension uniformity and registration of reticles combined with wafer overlay capability | |
US6498640B1 (en) | Method to measure alignment using latent image grating structures | |
US7473502B1 (en) | Imaging tool calibration artifact and method | |
US6084679A (en) | Universal alignment marks for semiconductor defect capture and analysis | |
US7336352B2 (en) | Position detection apparatus | |
US20020183989A1 (en) | Overlay error model, sampling strategy and associated equipment for implementation | |
KR100394585B1 (en) | Method and apparatus for overlay measurement | |
US6484060B1 (en) | Layout for measurement of overlay error | |
JPH07321012A (en) | Alignment method and manufacture of element using the same | |
US10191394B2 (en) | Distortion detection method, exposure apparatus, exposure method, and device manufacturing method | |
JPH0244137B2 (en) | ||
US20090127723A1 (en) | AIM-Compatible Targets for Use with Methods of Inspecting and Optionally Reworking Summed Photolithography Patterns Resulting from Plurally-Overlaid Patterning Steps During Mass Production of Semiconductor Devices | |
KR20230052888A (en) | A method for producing overlay artifacts over absolute references for semiconductor manufacturing | |
JP2859855B2 (en) | Fine pattern alignment method for semiconductor device | |
US20060274935A1 (en) | Method for measuring registration of overlapping material layers of an integrated circuit | |
JP3374991B2 (en) | Projection optical system adjustment method, exposure method, and exposure apparatus | |
US6238940B1 (en) | Intra-tool defect offset system | |
JP2005011976A (en) | Position detecting method | |
US6671048B1 (en) | Method for determining wafer misalignment using a pattern on a fine alignment target | |
US6330355B1 (en) | Frame layout to monitor overlay performance of chip composed of multi-exposure images | |
US6379848B1 (en) | Reticle for use in photolithography and methods for inspecting and making same | |
JP4154197B2 (en) | Position detection method, position detection apparatus, and exposure apparatus | |
JPH09211840A (en) | Inspection method and inspection device for reticle as well as inspection method and inspection device for pattern |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
STCB | Information on status: application discontinuation |
Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION |