US20070100491A1 - Method of selecting optimum clothing style based on individually-assessed body type - Google Patents

Method of selecting optimum clothing style based on individually-assessed body type Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US20070100491A1
US20070100491A1 US11/252,072 US25207205A US2007100491A1 US 20070100491 A1 US20070100491 A1 US 20070100491A1 US 25207205 A US25207205 A US 25207205A US 2007100491 A1 US2007100491 A1 US 2007100491A1
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
body type
perceivable
shopper
identification system
retail entity
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Abandoned
Application number
US11/252,072
Inventor
Cheryl Burrell
Pamela Pryor
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Individual
Original Assignee
Individual
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Individual filed Critical Individual
Priority to US11/252,072 priority Critical patent/US20070100491A1/en
Publication of US20070100491A1 publication Critical patent/US20070100491A1/en
Abandoned legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • G—PHYSICS
    • G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q30/00—Commerce
    • G06Q30/06—Buying, selling or leasing transactions

Definitions

  • brick-and-mortar retail establishments (hereinafter “retailers”) arrange products on the premises with a variety of factors in mind. Specifically with regard to retailers that sell clothing, product arrangement on the premises is typically distinguished by departments which are often further arranged by gender, designers and ages. Retailers further employ strategies for promoting newer clothing lines by placing items near the most accessible areas of the retail establishment in order to generate the most profitable sales, whereas typically discounted items are placed in less accessible areas of a particular department. On-line or web-based retailers also arrange products on-line for purchase by shoppers. Typically, products are again organized by gender, design and ages via various links or listings.
  • the clothing selected for sale by retailers is typically driven by the fashion industry.
  • the clothing made available to the public is driven by and modeled after those fashions presented by the fashion industry (also referred to as “fashion trends”).
  • Retailers typically provide clothing based on the fashion trends, without consideration to whether particular clothing styles are suited to particular body types.
  • Fashion trends, in and of themselves, do not generally develop or evolve for the purpose of optimally suiting a variety of body types. Subsequently, consumers shop for clothing without regard or knowledge as to their particular body types and/or which clothing styles most optimally-suit their particular body types.
  • the present invention relates to a method of selecting optimum clothing style based on individually-assessed body type.
  • the method comprises the steps of
  • the body type identification system informs the shopper of at least one clothing item that optimally suits at least one perceivable body type.
  • the shopper is further able to assess and select a subsequent optimally-suited clothing item based on a particular body type.
  • One object of the present invention is to provide a method for retail entities to assist an individual in identifying his or her individual body-type.
  • Another object of the present invention is to provide individuals with a method of selecting an optimally-suited clothing style associated with an identified body type.
  • FIG. 1 is a flow diagram of the method of the present invention.
  • FIG. 2 is a top plan view of exemplary body types as described in the present invention.
  • FIG. 1 depicts a method of selecting optimum clothing style based on individually-assessed body type 10 .
  • the process includes a shopper 20 .
  • the shopper 20 may include, but is not limited to, the ultimate purchaser and user of the clothing or a personal shopper employed for purposes of selecting clothing for a client.
  • the shopper 20 then interacts with a retail entity 22 , which may include, but is not limited to, a brick-and-mortar retail establishment and/or a web-based (on-line) application administered or used by a retail establishment.
  • FIG. 1 further depicts the shopper 20 interacting with a retail entity 22 , which provides a body-type identification system 24 .
  • the body-type identification system 24 may be provided in association with SHAPESTM brand retail services and products.
  • the body-type identification system 24 involves assessment of at least one perceivable body type 26 .
  • Body types are perceivable at least two-dimensionally 28 . Examples of two-dimensional representations of body types may include written descriptions, including but not limited to, literature describing dimensions, colors, and shapes; books; advertising and promotional materials; pamphlets; questionnaires and other written tools.
  • Body types are further perceivable at least three-dimensionally 30 . Examples of three-dimensional representations of body types may include, but are not limited to, labels, mannequins and other physical tools and representations that inform perception of a three-dimensional body type.
  • FIG. 1 further depicts the retail entity 22 providing an association of an optimally-suited clothing style with the perceivable body type 32 .
  • the retail entity 22 may establish such an association through study, consultation and/or advisement with persons of ordinary skill in the art to determine the optimally-suited clothing style with the perceivable body type 32 .
  • persons of ordinary skill may include, but are not limited to, fashion design experts and personal stylists.
  • FIG. 1 further depicts that the shopper 20 assesses and selects individual body type and subsequent optimally-suited clothing item 34 .
  • the assessment is based on the shopper's determination of a perceived body type 30 and specific physical characteristics selected by the shopper.
  • the subsequent selection is based on the aforementioned determination of perceived body type 30 , coupled with the aforementioned retail entity's association of the optimally-suited clothing style with the perceived body type 30 .
  • FIG. 2 provides exemplary perceivable body types 26 , including, but not limited to, type G, type P, type A, type L, and type C, as described therein.
  • Exemplary perceivable body types 26 may further include, but are not limited to, colors. Examples of colors may include, but are not limited to, blue, red, green, purple and orange.
  • Exemplary perceivable body types 26 may further include, but are not limited to, combinations of shapes, colors and written and physical descriptions as referenced herein.

Abstract

A method of selecting an optimum clothing style based on individually-assessed body type. The method comprises the steps of a shopper, interacting with a retail entity, which provides a body type identification system, through which a shopper can assess and select a clothing style optimally-suited for a particular body type.

Description

    BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
  • People have been shopping at retail establishments for decades, for all manners of basic household, domestic and textile goods. Brick-and-mortar retail establishments (hereinafter “retailers”) arrange products on the premises with a variety of factors in mind. Specifically with regard to retailers that sell clothing, product arrangement on the premises is typically distinguished by departments which are often further arranged by gender, designers and ages. Retailers further employ strategies for promoting newer clothing lines by placing items near the most accessible areas of the retail establishment in order to generate the most profitable sales, whereas typically discounted items are placed in less accessible areas of a particular department. On-line or web-based retailers also arrange products on-line for purchase by shoppers. Typically, products are again organized by gender, design and ages via various links or listings.
  • The clothing selected for sale by retailers is typically driven by the fashion industry. Thus, the clothing made available to the public is driven by and modeled after those fashions presented by the fashion industry (also referred to as “fashion trends”). Retailers typically provide clothing based on the fashion trends, without consideration to whether particular clothing styles are suited to particular body types. Fashion trends, in and of themselves, do not generally develop or evolve for the purpose of optimally suiting a variety of body types. Subsequently, consumers shop for clothing without regard or knowledge as to their particular body types and/or which clothing styles most optimally-suit their particular body types.
  • Personal shoppers are sometimes hired to consult with and shop on behalf of clients, choosing color palettes and clothing styles that are appropriate to the individual body type and personal characteristics of the client. This is mostly due to a client's need to find professional and/or optimally-suited clothing styles, when the client does not have time to shop for himself/herself. However, personal shoppers are often quite expensive to hire and thus those services are not accessible to the average consumer.
  • Further, the consuming public is often ill-educated as to their individual body types and which particular clothing items and styles are the most well-suited to their individual body types. At all levels of economic status, people want to convey an image of confidence, professionalism and sophistication with regards to personal appearance.
    • SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
  • The present invention relates to a method of selecting optimum clothing style based on individually-assessed body type. The method comprises the steps of
  • (a) a shopper;
  • (b) interacting with a retail entity;
  • (c) said retail entity providing a body type identification system; and
  • (d) at least one clothing item;
  • wherein the body type identification system informs the shopper of at least one clothing item that optimally suits at least one perceivable body type.
  • The shopper is further able to assess and select a subsequent optimally-suited clothing item based on a particular body type.
  • One object of the present invention is to provide a method for retail entities to assist an individual in identifying his or her individual body-type.
  • Another object of the present invention is to provide individuals with a method of selecting an optimally-suited clothing style associated with an identified body type.
    • BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
  • FIG. 1 is a flow diagram of the method of the present invention.
  • FIG. 2 is a top plan view of exemplary body types as described in the present invention.
    • DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT
  • FIG. 1 depicts a method of selecting optimum clothing style based on individually-assessed body type 10. The process includes a shopper 20. The shopper 20 may include, but is not limited to, the ultimate purchaser and user of the clothing or a personal shopper employed for purposes of selecting clothing for a client. The shopper 20 then interacts with a retail entity 22, which may include, but is not limited to, a brick-and-mortar retail establishment and/or a web-based (on-line) application administered or used by a retail establishment.
  • FIG. 1 further depicts the shopper 20 interacting with a retail entity 22, which provides a body-type identification system 24. The body-type identification system 24, may be provided in association with SHAPES™ brand retail services and products. The body-type identification system 24 involves assessment of at least one perceivable body type 26. Body types are perceivable at least two-dimensionally 28. Examples of two-dimensional representations of body types may include written descriptions, including but not limited to, literature describing dimensions, colors, and shapes; books; advertising and promotional materials; pamphlets; questionnaires and other written tools. Body types are further perceivable at least three-dimensionally 30. Examples of three-dimensional representations of body types may include, but are not limited to, labels, mannequins and other physical tools and representations that inform perception of a three-dimensional body type.
  • FIG. 1 further depicts the retail entity 22 providing an association of an optimally-suited clothing style with the perceivable body type 32. The retail entity 22 may establish such an association through study, consultation and/or advisement with persons of ordinary skill in the art to determine the optimally-suited clothing style with the perceivable body type 32. Such persons of ordinary skill may include, but are not limited to, fashion design experts and personal stylists.
  • FIG. 1 further depicts that the shopper 20 assesses and selects individual body type and subsequent optimally-suited clothing item 34. The assessment is based on the shopper's determination of a perceived body type 30 and specific physical characteristics selected by the shopper. The subsequent selection is based on the aforementioned determination of perceived body type 30, coupled with the aforementioned retail entity's association of the optimally-suited clothing style with the perceived body type 30.
  • FIG. 2 provides exemplary perceivable body types 26, including, but not limited to, type G, type P, type A, type L, and type C, as described therein. Exemplary perceivable body types 26 may further include, but are not limited to, colors. Examples of colors may include, but are not limited to, blue, red, green, purple and orange. Exemplary perceivable body types 26 may further include, but are not limited to, combinations of shapes, colors and written and physical descriptions as referenced herein.

Claims (20)

1. A method of selecting optimum clothing style based on individually-assessed body type, comprising the steps of:
(a) a shopper;
(b) interacting with a retail entity;
(c) said retail entity providing a body type identification system; and
(d) at least one clothing item;
wherein the body type identification system informs the shopper of at least one clothing item that optimally suits at least one perceivable body type.
2. The method in claim 1, wherein the shopper assesses and subsequently selects an optimally-suited clothing item, based on the perceivable body type.
3. The method in claim 1, wherein the shopper's interaction with the retail entity occurs at a physical brick-and-mortar establishment.
4. The method in claim 1, wherein the shopper's interaction with the retail entity occurs via a web-based application.
5. The method in claim 1, wherein the body type identification system comprises a two-dimensional description of the perceivable body type.
6. The method in claim 1, wherein the body type identification system comprises a three-dimensional description of the perceivable body type.
7. The body type identification system in claim 1, wherein the perceivable body type is associated with a color.
8. The body type identification system in claim 1, wherein the perceivable body type is associated with a body shape label.
9. The body type identification system in claim 1, wherein the perceivable body type is a custom-designed mannequin.
10. A method of selecting optimum clothing style based on individually-assessed body type, comprising the steps of:
(a) a shopper;
(b) interacting with a retail entity;
(c) said retail entity providing a body type identification system, comprising at least one perceivable body type, and (d) at least one clothing item;
11. The method in claim 10, wherein the shopper assesses and subsequently selects an optimally-suited clothing item, based on the perceivable body type.
12. The method in claim 10, wherein the body type identification system comprises a two-dimensional description of the perceivable body type.
13. The body type identification system in claim 12, wherein the two-dimensional description comprises a color associated with the perceivable body type.
14. The body type identification system in claim 12, wherein the two-dimensional description comprises a written description of the perceivable body type.
15. The method in claim 10, wherein the body type identification system comprises a three-dimensional description of the perceivable body type.
16. The three-dimensional description in claim 14, wherein the three-dimensional description comprises a custom-designed mannequin.
17. The three-dimensional description in claim 14, wherein the three-dimensional description is a label comprising the shape of the perceivable body type.
18. A method of selecting optimum clothing style based on individually-assessed body type, comprising the steps of:
(a) a shopper;
(b) interacting with a retail entity;
(d) said retail entity providing a body-type identification system, comprising at least one perceivable body type;
(e) said retail entity providing at least one clothing item, wherein the body type identification system informs the shopper of at least one clothing item provided by the retail entity that optimally suits the perceivable body type and wherein the shopper assesses and subsequently selects the optimally-suited clothing item; and
(f) said shopper recording the individual body type information with the retail establishment for future use by the shopper and/or retail entity.
19. The method in claim 18, wherein the shopper records individual body type information at the physical brick-and-mortar retail establishment.
20. The method in claim 18, wherein the shopper records individual body type information via a web-based application.
US11/252,072 2005-10-17 2005-10-17 Method of selecting optimum clothing style based on individually-assessed body type Abandoned US20070100491A1 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US11/252,072 US20070100491A1 (en) 2005-10-17 2005-10-17 Method of selecting optimum clothing style based on individually-assessed body type

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US11/252,072 US20070100491A1 (en) 2005-10-17 2005-10-17 Method of selecting optimum clothing style based on individually-assessed body type

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US20070100491A1 true US20070100491A1 (en) 2007-05-03

Family

ID=37997558

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US11/252,072 Abandoned US20070100491A1 (en) 2005-10-17 2005-10-17 Method of selecting optimum clothing style based on individually-assessed body type

Country Status (1)

Country Link
US (1) US20070100491A1 (en)

Cited By (25)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20090248547A1 (en) * 2008-03-31 2009-10-01 Sap Ag Managing Consistent Interfaces for Retail Business Objects Across Heterogeneous Systems
US20100070384A1 (en) * 2007-03-19 2010-03-18 Massi Miliano OÜ Method and system for custom tailoring and retail sale of clothing
US8671041B2 (en) 2008-12-12 2014-03-11 Sap Ag Managing consistent interfaces for credit portfolio business objects across heterogeneous systems
US8725654B2 (en) 2011-07-28 2014-05-13 Sap Ag Managing consistent interfaces for employee data replication business objects across heterogeneous systems
US8756135B2 (en) 2012-06-28 2014-06-17 Sap Ag Consistent interface for product valuation data and product valuation level
US8756274B2 (en) 2012-02-16 2014-06-17 Sap Ag Consistent interface for sales territory message type set 1
US8762454B2 (en) 2012-02-16 2014-06-24 Sap Ag Consistent interface for flag and tag
US8762453B2 (en) 2012-02-16 2014-06-24 Sap Ag Consistent interface for feed collaboration group and feed event subscription
US8775280B2 (en) 2011-07-28 2014-07-08 Sap Ag Managing consistent interfaces for financial business objects across heterogeneous systems
US8799115B2 (en) 2008-02-28 2014-08-05 Sap Ag Managing consistent interfaces for business objects across heterogeneous systems
US8924269B2 (en) 2006-05-13 2014-12-30 Sap Ag Consistent set of interfaces derived from a business object model
US8949855B2 (en) 2012-06-28 2015-02-03 Sap Se Consistent interface for address snapshot and approval process definition
US8984050B2 (en) 2012-02-16 2015-03-17 Sap Se Consistent interface for sales territory message type set 2
US9043236B2 (en) 2012-08-22 2015-05-26 Sap Se Consistent interface for financial instrument impairment attribute values analytical result
US9076112B2 (en) 2012-08-22 2015-07-07 Sap Se Consistent interface for financial instrument impairment expected cash flow analytical result
US9135585B2 (en) 2010-06-15 2015-09-15 Sap Se Managing consistent interfaces for property library, property list template, quantity conversion virtual object, and supplier property specification business objects across heterogeneous systems
US9191357B2 (en) 2013-03-15 2015-11-17 Sap Se Consistent interface for email activity business object
US9191343B2 (en) 2013-03-15 2015-11-17 Sap Se Consistent interface for appointment activity business object
US9232368B2 (en) 2012-02-16 2016-01-05 Sap Se Consistent interface for user feed administrator, user feed event link and user feed settings
US9237425B2 (en) 2012-02-16 2016-01-12 Sap Se Consistent interface for feed event, feed event document and feed event type
US9246869B2 (en) 2012-06-28 2016-01-26 Sap Se Consistent interface for opportunity
US9261950B2 (en) 2012-06-28 2016-02-16 Sap Se Consistent interface for document output request
US9367826B2 (en) 2012-06-28 2016-06-14 Sap Se Consistent interface for entitlement product
US9400998B2 (en) 2012-06-28 2016-07-26 Sap Se Consistent interface for message-based communication arrangement, organisational centre replication request, and payment schedule
US9547833B2 (en) 2012-08-22 2017-01-17 Sap Se Consistent interface for financial instrument impairment calculation

Citations (15)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5680528A (en) * 1994-05-24 1997-10-21 Korszun; Henry A. Digital dressing room
US5930769A (en) * 1996-10-07 1999-07-27 Rose; Andrea System and method for fashion shopping
US20010026272A1 (en) * 2000-04-03 2001-10-04 Avihay Feld System and method for simulation of virtual wear articles on virtual models
US6353770B1 (en) * 1999-05-26 2002-03-05 Levi Strauss & Co. Apparatus and method for the remote production of customized clothing
US20020138170A1 (en) * 2000-12-20 2002-09-26 Onyshkevych Vsevolod A. System, method and article of manufacture for automated fit and size predictions
US20020188372A1 (en) * 2001-05-10 2002-12-12 Lane Kenneth M. Method and system for computer aided garment selection
US6546309B1 (en) * 2000-06-29 2003-04-08 Kinney & Lange, P.A. Virtual fitting room
US6701207B1 (en) * 2000-11-02 2004-03-02 Kinney & Lange, P.A. Method for integrating information relating to apparel fit, apparel sizing and body form variance
US20040083142A1 (en) * 2001-03-08 2004-04-29 Kozzinn Jacob Karl System and method for fitting clothing
US20040186611A1 (en) * 2001-05-11 2004-09-23 Wang Kenneth Kuk-Kei Universal method for identifying human body profiles
US6968075B1 (en) * 2000-05-09 2005-11-22 Chang Kurt C System and method for three-dimensional shape and size measurement
US20060015208A1 (en) * 2002-12-31 2006-01-19 Reyes Infografica S.L. Computer-assisted method for designing garments
US20060149638A1 (en) * 2005-01-06 2006-07-06 Allen Anita L Electronic personalized clothing makeover assistant
US7092782B2 (en) * 2003-03-20 2006-08-15 Mbrio L.L.C. Systems and methods for improved apparel fit
US20060287877A1 (en) * 2005-04-27 2006-12-21 Myshape Incorporated Matching the fit of individual garments to individual consumers

Patent Citations (17)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5680528A (en) * 1994-05-24 1997-10-21 Korszun; Henry A. Digital dressing room
US5930769A (en) * 1996-10-07 1999-07-27 Rose; Andrea System and method for fashion shopping
US6353770B1 (en) * 1999-05-26 2002-03-05 Levi Strauss & Co. Apparatus and method for the remote production of customized clothing
US20010026272A1 (en) * 2000-04-03 2001-10-04 Avihay Feld System and method for simulation of virtual wear articles on virtual models
US7149665B2 (en) * 2000-04-03 2006-12-12 Browzwear International Ltd System and method for simulation of virtual wear articles on virtual models
US6968075B1 (en) * 2000-05-09 2005-11-22 Chang Kurt C System and method for three-dimensional shape and size measurement
US6546309B1 (en) * 2000-06-29 2003-04-08 Kinney & Lange, P.A. Virtual fitting room
US6701207B1 (en) * 2000-11-02 2004-03-02 Kinney & Lange, P.A. Method for integrating information relating to apparel fit, apparel sizing and body form variance
US20020138170A1 (en) * 2000-12-20 2002-09-26 Onyshkevych Vsevolod A. System, method and article of manufacture for automated fit and size predictions
US6665577B2 (en) * 2000-12-20 2003-12-16 My Virtual Model Inc. System, method and article of manufacture for automated fit and size predictions
US20040083142A1 (en) * 2001-03-08 2004-04-29 Kozzinn Jacob Karl System and method for fitting clothing
US20020188372A1 (en) * 2001-05-10 2002-12-12 Lane Kenneth M. Method and system for computer aided garment selection
US20040186611A1 (en) * 2001-05-11 2004-09-23 Wang Kenneth Kuk-Kei Universal method for identifying human body profiles
US20060015208A1 (en) * 2002-12-31 2006-01-19 Reyes Infografica S.L. Computer-assisted method for designing garments
US7092782B2 (en) * 2003-03-20 2006-08-15 Mbrio L.L.C. Systems and methods for improved apparel fit
US20060149638A1 (en) * 2005-01-06 2006-07-06 Allen Anita L Electronic personalized clothing makeover assistant
US20060287877A1 (en) * 2005-04-27 2006-12-21 Myshape Incorporated Matching the fit of individual garments to individual consumers

Cited By (27)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US8924269B2 (en) 2006-05-13 2014-12-30 Sap Ag Consistent set of interfaces derived from a business object model
US20100070384A1 (en) * 2007-03-19 2010-03-18 Massi Miliano OÜ Method and system for custom tailoring and retail sale of clothing
US9655395B2 (en) * 2007-03-19 2017-05-23 Massi Miliano Ltd. Method and system for custom tailoring and retail sale of clothing
US8799115B2 (en) 2008-02-28 2014-08-05 Sap Ag Managing consistent interfaces for business objects across heterogeneous systems
US8589263B2 (en) * 2008-03-31 2013-11-19 Sap Ag Managing consistent interfaces for retail business objects across heterogeneous systems
US20090248547A1 (en) * 2008-03-31 2009-10-01 Sap Ag Managing Consistent Interfaces for Retail Business Objects Across Heterogeneous Systems
US8671041B2 (en) 2008-12-12 2014-03-11 Sap Ag Managing consistent interfaces for credit portfolio business objects across heterogeneous systems
US9135585B2 (en) 2010-06-15 2015-09-15 Sap Se Managing consistent interfaces for property library, property list template, quantity conversion virtual object, and supplier property specification business objects across heterogeneous systems
US8725654B2 (en) 2011-07-28 2014-05-13 Sap Ag Managing consistent interfaces for employee data replication business objects across heterogeneous systems
US8775280B2 (en) 2011-07-28 2014-07-08 Sap Ag Managing consistent interfaces for financial business objects across heterogeneous systems
US8762453B2 (en) 2012-02-16 2014-06-24 Sap Ag Consistent interface for feed collaboration group and feed event subscription
US8762454B2 (en) 2012-02-16 2014-06-24 Sap Ag Consistent interface for flag and tag
US8756274B2 (en) 2012-02-16 2014-06-17 Sap Ag Consistent interface for sales territory message type set 1
US8984050B2 (en) 2012-02-16 2015-03-17 Sap Se Consistent interface for sales territory message type set 2
US9237425B2 (en) 2012-02-16 2016-01-12 Sap Se Consistent interface for feed event, feed event document and feed event type
US9232368B2 (en) 2012-02-16 2016-01-05 Sap Se Consistent interface for user feed administrator, user feed event link and user feed settings
US8949855B2 (en) 2012-06-28 2015-02-03 Sap Se Consistent interface for address snapshot and approval process definition
US9246869B2 (en) 2012-06-28 2016-01-26 Sap Se Consistent interface for opportunity
US9261950B2 (en) 2012-06-28 2016-02-16 Sap Se Consistent interface for document output request
US9367826B2 (en) 2012-06-28 2016-06-14 Sap Se Consistent interface for entitlement product
US9400998B2 (en) 2012-06-28 2016-07-26 Sap Se Consistent interface for message-based communication arrangement, organisational centre replication request, and payment schedule
US8756135B2 (en) 2012-06-28 2014-06-17 Sap Ag Consistent interface for product valuation data and product valuation level
US9076112B2 (en) 2012-08-22 2015-07-07 Sap Se Consistent interface for financial instrument impairment expected cash flow analytical result
US9043236B2 (en) 2012-08-22 2015-05-26 Sap Se Consistent interface for financial instrument impairment attribute values analytical result
US9547833B2 (en) 2012-08-22 2017-01-17 Sap Se Consistent interface for financial instrument impairment calculation
US9191357B2 (en) 2013-03-15 2015-11-17 Sap Se Consistent interface for email activity business object
US9191343B2 (en) 2013-03-15 2015-11-17 Sap Se Consistent interface for appointment activity business object

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US20070100491A1 (en) Method of selecting optimum clothing style based on individually-assessed body type
Dotson et al. Consumer Perceptions of Department Store Service: a Lessonfor Retailers
Bagdare Antecedents of retail customer experience.
Hashim et al. Exploring islamic retailer store attributes from consumers perspectives: An empirical investigation
Kumar et al. Measuring Retailer Store Image: A Scale Development Study.
Ramayah et al. What drives relationship quality? A study of two retail clothing stores
Adam Impact of Visual Merchandising on Customer Impulse buying behavior in retail stores in Sudan
CN105027156B (en) Reflect the culture and arts works integrated management service providing method of requesting party's demand
Randhawa et al. Visual merchandising and impulse buying behavior-is there any relationship
Amin et al. Quantitative ABCD Analysis of In-store Customer Perception Purchase of Home Furniture
Tiwari et al. Impact of merchandising on customer satisfaction and thereby on retailers sale-A study in selected malls of Jabalpur and Gwalior city
Davies Innovation in retailing
Foster ‘Scatter my ashes at Saks Fifth Avenue’: Boundary work and intermediation in the fashion landscape
Atulkar et al. Adoption of retailer centric philosophy in organizing buying process: a case study on Indian buying systems
Muruganantham et al. Private label retailers: Systematic review of winning strategies
Muharam et al. The role of entrepreneurial personality on competitive advantages and corporate image based on digital
Yadav et al. An attribute-based perceptual mapping of different retail formats in India
Hamza A study on the customers preference towards the selection of shopping outlet
CN106709740A (en) Mobile wardrobe type sale method
Manimtim et al. Market Structures: Unveiling Product Differentiation Strategies: Industry Dynamics, Key Drivers, and Consumer Perspectives
Ikra Visual Merchandising, Premium Pricing and Ethnocentrism Marketing Strategies Used by Various Industrial Sectors in Sri Lanka: Comprehensive Literature Review
Kene et al. A STUDY OF FACTORS OF CONSUMER BUYING BEHAVIOUR AND ITS INFLUENCE ON CONSUMER PERCEPTION: EVIDENCE FROM VALUE FASHION RETAIL IN THE CITY OF NAGPUR
Widodo et al. Consumer Motives Towards Online Shopping Before and During COVID 19.
Lee et al. Which relational benefits really matter to multi-channel agencies?
JP2004187804A (en) Tag, store, commodity displaying method for shelf, commodity selling method, preparing method for commodity catalog

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
STCB Information on status: application discontinuation

Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION