US20070180251A1 - Methods Utilizing Steganography - Google Patents

Methods Utilizing Steganography Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US20070180251A1
US20070180251A1 US11/622,373 US62237307A US2007180251A1 US 20070180251 A1 US20070180251 A1 US 20070180251A1 US 62237307 A US62237307 A US 62237307A US 2007180251 A1 US2007180251 A1 US 2007180251A1
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
data
action
plural
identifier
bit
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
US11/622,373
Other versions
US8290202B2 (en
Inventor
J. Carr
Bruce Davis
Geoffrey Rhoads
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Digimarc Corp
Original Assignee
Digimarc Corp
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Priority claimed from US09/185,380 external-priority patent/US6549638B2/en
Priority claimed from US10/367,092 external-priority patent/US7113615B2/en
Priority claimed from US10/639,598 external-priority patent/US20060028689A1/en
Priority to US11/622,373 priority Critical patent/US8290202B2/en
Application filed by Digimarc Corp filed Critical Digimarc Corp
Assigned to DIGIMARC CORPORATION reassignment DIGIMARC CORPORATION ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: DAVIS, BRUCE L., RHOADS, GEOFFREY B., CARR, J. SCOTT
Publication of US20070180251A1 publication Critical patent/US20070180251A1/en
Assigned to DIGIMARC CORPORATION (FORMERLY DMRC CORPORATION) reassignment DIGIMARC CORPORATION (FORMERLY DMRC CORPORATION) CONFIRMATION OF TRANSFER OF UNITED STATES PATENT RIGHTS Assignors: L-1 SECURE CREDENTIALING, INC. (FORMERLY KNOWN AS DIGIMARC CORPORATION)
Assigned to DIGIMARC CORPORATION (AN OREGON CORPORATION) reassignment DIGIMARC CORPORATION (AN OREGON CORPORATION) MERGER (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: DIGIMARC CORPORATION (A DELAWARE CORPORATION)
Assigned to DMRC LLC reassignment DMRC LLC ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: DIGIMARC CORPORATION (A DELAWARE CORPORATION)
Assigned to DMRC CORPORATION reassignment DMRC CORPORATION MERGER (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: DMRC LLC
Assigned to DIGIMARC CORPORATION reassignment DIGIMARC CORPORATION MERGER (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: DMRC CORPORATION
Publication of US8290202B2 publication Critical patent/US8290202B2/en
Application granted granted Critical
Adjusted expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Lifetime legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06FELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F21/00Security arrangements for protecting computers, components thereof, programs or data against unauthorised activity
    • G06F21/10Protecting distributed programs or content, e.g. vending or licensing of copyrighted material ; Digital rights management [DRM]
    • G06F21/16Program or content traceability, e.g. by watermarking
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04NPICTORIAL COMMUNICATION, e.g. TELEVISION
    • H04N1/00Scanning, transmission or reproduction of documents or the like, e.g. facsimile transmission; Details thereof
    • H04N1/32Circuits or arrangements for control or supervision between transmitter and receiver or between image input and image output device, e.g. between a still-image camera and its memory or between a still-image camera and a printer device
    • H04N1/32101Display, printing, storage or transmission of additional information, e.g. ID code, date and time or title
    • H04N1/32144Display, printing, storage or transmission of additional information, e.g. ID code, date and time or title embedded in the image data, i.e. enclosed or integrated in the image, e.g. watermark, super-imposed logo or stamp
    • H04N1/32149Methods relating to embedding, encoding, decoding, detection or retrieval operations
    • H04N1/32203Spatial or amplitude domain methods
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04NPICTORIAL COMMUNICATION, e.g. TELEVISION
    • H04N2201/00Indexing scheme relating to scanning, transmission or reproduction of documents or the like, and to details thereof
    • H04N2201/32Circuits or arrangements for control or supervision between transmitter and receiver or between image input and image output device, e.g. between a still-image camera and its memory or between a still-image camera and a printer device
    • H04N2201/3201Display, printing, storage or transmission of additional information, e.g. ID code, date and time or title
    • H04N2201/3269Display, printing, storage or transmission of additional information, e.g. ID code, date and time or title of machine readable codes or marks, e.g. bar codes or glyphs
    • H04N2201/327Display, printing, storage or transmission of additional information, e.g. ID code, date and time or title of machine readable codes or marks, e.g. bar codes or glyphs which are undetectable to the naked eye, e.g. embedded codes

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to computer systems, and more particularly relates to techniques for establishing persistent evidence of a computer's use for possibly illicit purposes (e.g. counterfeiting).
  • counterfeiting was a rare art practiced by a small number of skilled engravers using esoteric equipment.
  • Today, counterfeiting is a rampant problem practiced by thousands of criminals using ubiquitous computer equipment.
  • covert tracing data in all printed output from color photocopiers (and some color printers) brings into play the balancing of law enforcement needs versus the widely recognized users' rights of privacy and freedom of expression. Unbounded use of such covert marking techniques can raise the spectre of an Orwellian “Big Brother.”
  • tracer data is selectively generated to assist law enforcement agencies in prosecuting counterfeiters.
  • it is secretly stored in the counterfeiter's computer. If the computer is later searched or seized, the tracer data can be recovered and employed as evidence of the computer's use in counterfeiting.
  • FIG. 1 is a diagram of a computer system according to one embodiment of the present invention.
  • FIG. 2 is a diagram illustrating certain of the principles used in the FIG. 1 embodiment.
  • a computer system 10 employed in one embodiment of the present invention includes a processor 11 , a non-volatile store 12 , volatile memory 14 , an external interface 16 , and various peripherals (e.g. a scanner 18 , a printer 20 , etc.).
  • the processor 11 typically comprises a CPU, such as one of the microprocessors available from Intel, Sun, AMD, Cyrix, Motorola, MIPS, etc.
  • the processor can take other forms, including hardwired logic circuitry, programmable logic (e.g. FPGAs), or yet-to-be-devised processing arrangements.
  • the non-volatile store 12 typically comprises a magnetic disk, but can also include other writeable media, including optical disks, flash memory, EEPROMS, ROMBIOS, etc.
  • the non-volatile store can be physically located with the processor 11 (e.g. hard disk, CMOS memory with system setup data, etc), and/or can be remote (e.g. a networked drive, storage accessible over the Internet, etc.).
  • the volatile memory 14 typically comprises RAM, either integrated with the CPU (e.g. cache), and/or separate.
  • the external interface 16 can take various forms, including a modem, a network interface, a USB port, etc. Any link to a remote resource other than common peripherals is generally considered to employ an external interface.
  • the non-volatile store 12 Stored in the non-volatile store 12 is various software. This includes operating system software, applications software, and various user files (word processing documents, image files, etc.).
  • the operating system software typically includes a thousand or more files, including a registry database (detailing the resources available in the system, etc.) and various device drivers (which serve as software interfaces between the CPU and peripheral devices, such as scanner 18 and printer 20 ).
  • the applications software includes executable code and data. Both the operating system software and the applications software may employ shared files (e.g. DLLs) which can be utilized by different executables and/or operating system components to provide desired functionality.
  • shared files e.g. DLLs
  • the peripherals 18 , 20 are typically connected to the computer system through a port 22 (e.g. serial, parallel, USB, SCSI, etc.) which permits bi-directional data exchange.
  • a port 22 e.g. serial, parallel, USB, SCSI, etc.
  • Each peripheral typically includes its own processor circuitry 24 that operates in conjunction with firmware 26 (software resident in memory within the printer) to perform peripheral-specific processing and control functions.
  • firmware 26 software resident in memory within the printer
  • some peripherals have other data storage.
  • the disposable “consumables” in printers increasingly include their own non-volatile memories 28 in which various calibration and/or usage data is stored.
  • the computer system writes forensic tracer data (sometimes terms an “audit trail”) to a non-volatile store if it detects a possibly illicit action, e.g. the processing of image data corresponding to a banknote.
  • forensic tracer data sometimes terms an “audit trail”
  • banknote is used to refer to all manner of value documents, including paper currency, travelers checks, money orders, stamps, university transcripts, stock certificates, passports, visas, concert—or sporting event tickets, etc.
  • the data is written in a manner(s), and/or to a location(s), chosen to minimize its possible detection by a cautious perpetrator. If the computer is later inspected pursuant to a lawful search and seizure, it can be analyzed for the presence of incriminating tracer data.
  • Hough-based pattern matching techniques as described, e.g., in Hough's U.S. Pat. No. 3,069,654, and Ballard, “Generalizing the Hough Transform to Detect Arbitrary Shapes,” Pattern Recognition, Vol. 13, No.2, pp.111-122, 1981.
  • One embodiment of such a system follows the approach outlined in the Ballard paper, and employs plural tables corresponding to different patterns found on banknotes, with different confidence.
  • Gross Hough processing is first performed using one or more rotationally-invariant features (e.g. U.S. Federal Reserve Seal) to quickly identify most image sets as not banknote-related.
  • Any data that looks to be potentially bank-note related after the first check is subjected to successively more selective, higher-confidence tests (some stepping through plural rotational states) to weed out more and more non-banknote image sets. Finally, any image data passing all the screens is concluded to be, to a very high degree of certainty, a banknote.
  • An appropriate signal is then generated (e.g. a change in state of a binary signal) to indicate detection of a banknote.
  • Neural networks and algorithms are also suitable for detection of patterns characteristic of banknotes, as illustrated by European patent EP 731,961, etc.
  • the detection algorithm can be tailored to operate on parts of scan-line data, without buffering the entire set of image data for analysis.
  • the algorithm can be implemented on less-sophisticated processors, such as those used in the scanner 18 or the printer 20 .
  • the processors can be programmed, by appropriate firmware, to perform such processing on any image data scanned by, or printed by, such devices.
  • modems and other interfaces SCSI, FireWire, IDE, ATAPI, etc.
  • software-implemented modems, network interfaces, UARTs, etc. can monitor the data traffic passing therethrough and flag any that appears to be banknote-related.
  • the full analysis operation can be performed by the interface, or the data can be copied and passed to the main processor for further analysis.
  • the forensic data typically includes at least the date (and optionally the time) at which the possibly illicit action occurred. Additionally, the forensic data can include the file name of the banknote image data (if available), and a code indicating the nature of the event noted (e.g., banknote data detected by the printer; banknote data detected passing through the modem on COM2; banknote data detected written to removable media having volume ID 01FF38; banknote data detected in file opened by Adobe Photoshop, etc.)
  • the forensic data can additionally detail the source from which the data came, and/or the destination to which it was sent (e.g. IP/email addresses).
  • the stored forensic data will typically include the use ID.
  • System status data can also be included, e.g. identifying peripheral devices attached to the system, code loaded into RAM memory, the amount of time the user spent working on the illicit data, etc.
  • Selected data from any operating system registry database e.g. identifying the registered owner of certain applications software then-loaded on the computer, software serial numbers, operational parameters, etc.
  • the computer is on a network or on the Internet, the network address, Ethernet MAC address, AppleTalk name and zone, TraceRoute information, or IP address information can be stored.
  • payload data recovered from the watermark can be included in the forensic tracer data.
  • the foregoing (and possibly more) information can be stored in detailed forensic tracer records.
  • the forensic tracer record can comprise a single bit indicating that the computer system has been used—at least once—for a possibly illicit action.
  • such data is desirably generated, transmitted, and stored redundantly, transparently, and inconspicuously.
  • Redundant generation of the tracer data refers to detection of possibly illicit activity at various points in the computer system, and/or during various operations.
  • possibly illicit activity can be detected, e.g., during scanning of an image, printing of a document, receiving or transmitting a file through a modem connection, opening a file with an application program, saving a file with an application program, copying data to a clipboard, etc.
  • Redundant transmission of the tracer data refers to its transmission to storage media several times.
  • it desirable to send tracer data to storage both immediately and on a delayed basis e.g. five minutes after detection of banknote data, and every two minutes thereafter for a period of M minutes.
  • Redundant storage of the tracer data refers to its storage at several different locations (simultaneously or sequentially).
  • Transparent generation/transmission/storage means that the acts associated with these operations will not arouse the counterfeiter's suspicion.
  • tracer data should be written in a manner assuring that the data will persist—either in the location originally written, or by copying during subsequent machine operation (e.g. on closing the application program, shutting down the operating system, etc.) to a location assuring longer-term availability.
  • Program-tracing tools typically monitor just the computer's main CPU so—where possible—at least some of the tracer data should be stored under the control of a different processing element, or in a location to which the tool's capabilities do not extend. Another option is to keep at least some of the tracer data in RAM memory for a period after the illicit action has been detected, and store it later.
  • Yet another option is to store at least some forensic tracer records in the operating system registry database. This resource is commonly accessed during system operation, so references to the database may not give rise to suspicion.
  • Inconspicuous storage covers a wide range of options.
  • Numerous encryption techniques are known, e.g. RSA, PGP, various private key techniques, etc., any of which can be used.
  • Encrypted tracer data can be stored with other encrypted system data, such as in a password file. Due to its encrypted nature, a hacker may not be able to discern what part of the stored data is tracer data and what part is, e.g., password data. Attempts to redact the tracer data risks corrupting the password data, jeopardizing the counterfeiter's later ability to login to the machine.
  • Another possibility is to steganographically encode the tracer data, e.g. by randomizing/obfuscating same and inconspicuously hiding it amidst other data (e.g. within graphic or audio files associated with start-up or shut-down of the computer operating system, or wherever else noise-like data can be introduced without alerting the user to its presence). Still another possibility is to create null code that resembles normal instructions or data, but instead serves as a forensic tracer record.
  • the tracer data can be patched into existing files, by appending to the end or otherwise. Or, rather than storing the tracer data as the content of a file, the data can be stored among a file's “properties.”
  • Another way to avoid creating new files is to avoid using the computer's “file system” altogether, and instead use low-level programming to effect direct writes to typically-unused or reserved physical areas on the disk.
  • the data is resident on the disk, but does not appear in any directory listing. (although such data may be lost if disk optimization tools are subsequently used, those skilled in the art will recognize that steps can be taken to minimize such risks.)
  • Yet another way to avoid creating new files is to relay at least some of the tracer data to outside the computer.
  • One expedient is to use an external interface to transmit the data for remote storage. Again, a great variety of techniques can be employed to reliably, yet effectively, effect such transmission. And the data transmission need not occur at the moment the possibly illicit action is occurring. Instead, such data can be queued and relayed away from the machine at a later time.
  • Still another way to avoid creating new files is to make use of deadwood files that commonly exist on most computers.
  • application programs typically employ installation utilities which copy compressed files onto the disk, together with code to decompress and install the software.
  • These compressed files and installation programs are usually not deleted, providing opportunities for their use as repositories of tracer data.
  • many computers include dozens or hundreds of duplicate files—only one of which is commonly used. By converting one or more of these files to use as a repository for tracer data, additional inconspicuous storage can be achieved.
  • Some application programs include hundreds of files, various of which are provided just for the occasional use of the rare super-user. Files that pass some litmus test of inactivity (e.g. not ever used, or not accessed for at least two years) might serve as tracer data repositories. (Disk utilities are available to determine when a given file was last accessed.) Yet another option is to append data to an application's Help files, or other binary data files used to save program state information for the application.
  • Some embodiments may perform self-integrity checks of old tracer records each time a new banknote is encountered, and repair any damage encountered.
  • old tracer records can be expanded to detail new illicit acts, in addition to (or in lieu of) creating independent records for each illicit act.
  • Utility software such as disk defragmenters, disk integrity checks, virus checkers, and other periodically-executed system maintenance tools can be written/patched to look in some of the places where forensic tracer records may be found and, if any are encountered, copy them to additional locations. Similar operations can be performed upon termination of selected application programs (e.g. image processing programs).
  • the computer system desirably includes several checkpoints for detecting illicit actions.
  • detectors can be implemented in some or all of the following: in image processing software applications, in DLLs commonly used with image processing, in printer drivers, in printer firmware, in scanner drivers, in scanner firmware, in modem or other external interface drivers and software, in email software, in FTP software, in the operating system (looking at the clipboard, etc.), etc., etc.
  • the checking should be done by several different processors (e.g. main CPU, programmable interface chips, scanner microcontroller, printer microprocessor, etc.).
  • computers can be employed in various other illicit or unauthorized activities.
  • Each generally is susceptible to computer-detection (e.g. threats against the president may be detected by specialized natural language analysis programs; computer-aided synthesis of illegal drugs may be indicated by certain chemical modeling instructions in software specific to that industry; unauthorized duplication of copyrighted works may be flagged by the presence of embedded watermark data in the copyrighted work; unauthorized distribution of classified or confidential business documents may be detected using known techniques, etc.).
  • the storage of forensic tracer data along the lines detailed above is equally applicable in such other contexts.
  • the software and peripherals may include generic services supporting the compilation of forensic tracer data, its encryption, transmission, storage, etc. These generic services can be invoked by detector modules that are customized to the particular illicit/unauthorized activity of concern. Some of the detector modules can be fairly generic too, e.g. generic pattern recognition or watermark detection services. These can be customized by data loaded into the computer (either at manufacture, or surreptitiously accompanying new or updated software) identifying particular images whose reproduction is unauthorized/illicit. As new banknotes are issued, updated customization data can be distributed. (Naturally, such detector customization data will need to be loaded and stored in a manner that is resistant against attack, e.g. using the approaches outlined above for the covert tracer data.)

Abstract

The present invention relates generally to steganography, digital watermarking and data hiding. In one embodiment a method is provided including: processing data representing content; analyzing the data to determine whether a plural-bit identifier is steganographically encoded therein, the plural-bit identifier encoded in the data through modifications to the data, the modifications steganographically hiding the presence of the plural-bit identifier; and upon detection of the plural-bit identifier, redundantly carrying out an action while attempting to conceal the action from one or more users of the content. Of course, other embodiments are described and claimed as well.

Description

    RELATED APPLICATION DATA
  • This application is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/639,598, filed Aug. 11, 2003 (published as US 2006-0028689 A1).
  • The U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/639,598 is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/367,092, filed Feb. 13, 2003 (now U.S. Pat. No. 7,113,615), which is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/185,380, filed Nov. 3, 1998 (now U.S. Pat. No. 6,549,638).
  • The U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/639,598 is also a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/465,418, filed Dec. 16, 1999 (abandoned), which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 60/112,955, filed Dec. 18, 1998.
  • The above U.S. patent documents are hereby incorporated by reference.
  • FIELD OF THE INVENTION
  • The present invention relates to computer systems, and more particularly relates to techniques for establishing persistent evidence of a computer's use for possibly illicit purposes (e.g. counterfeiting).
  • BACKGROUND AND SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
  • Fifty years ago, counterfeiting was a rare art practiced by a small number of skilled engravers using esoteric equipment. Today, counterfeiting is a rampant problem practiced by thousands of criminals using ubiquitous computer equipment.
  • Statistics from the U.S. Secret Service illustrate the magnitude of the problem in the United States. In a recent report, the Secret Service stated:
      • The amount of counterfeit currency passed in the United States over the last three fiscal years has remained fairly consistent; however, 1998 has seen a significant increase, largely due to inkjet produced counterfeits. Inkjet produced counterfeit currency comprised only 0.5% of the total counterfeit currency passed in fiscal year 1995. In comparison, 19% of the total counterfeit currency passed in the United States during fiscal year 1997 was inkjet produced, and 43% of the counterfeit currency passed through August 1998 has been ink jet counterfeit currency.
      • This trend is attributed to rapid improvements in technology, and the ever-increasing availability and affordability of scanners, high-resolution inkjet and other output devices, and computer systems. Digital counterfeiting is likely to continue to increase as the capabilities of systems and devices continue to improve, and as these capabilities become more readily understood by the criminal element.
  • Accompanying the Secret Service report was a table identifying the number of domestic counterfeiting plants raided, by type. Again, the explosive growth of inkjet counterfeiting is evident:
    FY98
    Type of Counterfeiting Plant FY95 FY96 FY97 (through July)
    Offset Counterfeiting 60 29 23 10
    Toner-Based Counterfeiting 59 62 87 47
    Inkjet-Based Counterfeiting 29 101 321 477
  • The problem is not limited to the United States; statistics from other countries show the above-detailed trends are worldwide.
  • Various means have been deployed over the years to deter the counterfeiting of banknotes and similar financial instruments. One is to incorporate design features in banknotes that are difficult to replicate. Another is to equip color photocopiers with the capability to recognize banknotes. If such a photocopier is presented with a banknote for duplication, copying is disabled or impaired.
  • Yet another approach is for color photocopiers to imperceptibly write their serial number on all output sheets, e.g. using small, light yellow lettering. (Such an arrangement is shown, e.g., in European laid-open application EP 554,115 and in U.S. Pat. No. 5,557,742.) While unknown to most of the public, the majority of color photocopiers employ this, or similar means, to mark all output copies with covert tracing data.
  • The inclusion of covert tracing data in all printed output from color photocopiers (and some color printers) brings into play the balancing of law enforcement needs versus the widely recognized users' rights of privacy and freedom of expression. Unbounded use of such covert marking techniques can raise the spectre of an Orwellian “Big Brother.”
  • In accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present invention, tracer data is selectively generated to assist law enforcement agencies in prosecuting counterfeiters. However, instead of rotely incorporating such data into all printed output, it is secretly stored in the counterfeiter's computer. If the computer is later searched or seized, the tracer data can be recovered and employed as evidence of the computer's use in counterfeiting.
  • The foregoing and additional features and advantages of the present invention will be more readily apparent from the following detailed description, which proceeds with reference to the accompanying drawings.
  • BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
  • FIG. 1 is a diagram of a computer system according to one embodiment of the present invention.
  • FIG. 2 is a diagram illustrating certain of the principles used in the FIG. 1 embodiment.
  • DETAILED DESCRIPTION
  • Referring to FIG. 1, a computer system 10 employed in one embodiment of the present invention includes a processor 11, a non-volatile store 12, volatile memory 14, an external interface 16, and various peripherals (e.g. a scanner 18, a printer 20, etc.).
  • The processor 11 typically comprises a CPU, such as one of the microprocessors available from Intel, Sun, AMD, Cyrix, Motorola, MIPS, etc. Alternatively, the processor can take other forms, including hardwired logic circuitry, programmable logic (e.g. FPGAs), or yet-to-be-devised processing arrangements.
  • The non-volatile store 12 typically comprises a magnetic disk, but can also include other writeable media, including optical disks, flash memory, EEPROMS, ROMBIOS, etc. The non-volatile store can be physically located with the processor 11 (e.g. hard disk, CMOS memory with system setup data, etc), and/or can be remote (e.g. a networked drive, storage accessible over the Internet, etc.).
  • The volatile memory 14 typically comprises RAM, either integrated with the CPU (e.g. cache), and/or separate.
  • The external interface 16 can take various forms, including a modem, a network interface, a USB port, etc. Any link to a remote resource other than common peripherals is generally considered to employ an external interface.
  • Stored in the non-volatile store 12 is various software. This includes operating system software, applications software, and various user files (word processing documents, image files, etc.). The operating system software typically includes a thousand or more files, including a registry database (detailing the resources available in the system, etc.) and various device drivers (which serve as software interfaces between the CPU and peripheral devices, such as scanner 18 and printer 20). The applications software includes executable code and data. Both the operating system software and the applications software may employ shared files (e.g. DLLs) which can be utilized by different executables and/or operating system components to provide desired functionality.
  • While illustrated as resident in the non-volatile store 12, the foregoing software is generally loaded into the volatile memory 14 for execution.
  • The peripherals 18, 20 are typically connected to the computer system through a port 22 (e.g. serial, parallel, USB, SCSI, etc.) which permits bi-directional data exchange. Each peripheral typically includes its own processor circuitry 24 that operates in conjunction with firmware 26 (software resident in memory within the printer) to perform peripheral-specific processing and control functions. In addition to the memory in which the firmware is stored (e.g. EEPROM, flash memory, etc.), some peripherals have other data storage. For example, the disposable “consumables” in printers increasingly include their own non-volatile memories 28 in which various calibration and/or usage data is stored.
  • In one embodiment of the present invention, the computer system writes forensic tracer data (sometimes terms an “audit trail”) to a non-volatile store if it detects a possibly illicit action, e.g. the processing of image data corresponding to a banknote. (For expository convenience, the term “banknote” is used to refer to all manner of value documents, including paper currency, travelers checks, money orders, stamps, university transcripts, stock certificates, passports, visas, concert—or sporting event tickets, etc.) The data is written in a manner(s), and/or to a location(s), chosen to minimize its possible detection by a cautious perpetrator. If the computer is later inspected pursuant to a lawful search and seizure, it can be analyzed for the presence of incriminating tracer data.
  • There is considerable prior work in the field of detecting security documents from image data. Published European application EP 649,114, for example, describes banknote detection techniques based on the use of fuzzy inferencing to detect geometrical arrays of certain patterns (sometimes termed “common marks”) that are characteristic of banknotes. U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,515,451, 5,533,144, 5,629,990, and 5,796,869 describe banknote detection techniques based on different pattern matching techniques (e.g. to recognize the Federal Reserve seal). Xerox has also proposed its data glyph technology (detailed, e.g., in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,706,364, 5,689,620, 5,684,885, 5,680,223, 5,668,636, 5,640,647, 5,594,809) as a means to mark security documents for later machine-identification.
  • Another means for detecting security documents is by use of Hough-based pattern matching techniques as described, e.g., in Hough's U.S. Pat. No. 3,069,654, and Ballard, “Generalizing the Hough Transform to Detect Arbitrary Shapes,” Pattern Recognition, Vol. 13, No.2, pp.111-122, 1981. One embodiment of such a system follows the approach outlined in the Ballard paper, and employs plural tables corresponding to different patterns found on banknotes, with different confidence. Gross Hough processing is first performed using one or more rotationally-invariant features (e.g. U.S. Federal Reserve Seal) to quickly identify most image sets as not banknote-related. Any data that looks to be potentially bank-note related after the first check is subjected to successively more selective, higher-confidence tests (some stepping through plural rotational states) to weed out more and more non-banknote image sets. Finally, any image data passing all the screens is concluded to be, to a very high degree of certainty, a banknote. An appropriate signal is then generated (e.g. a change in state of a binary signal) to indicate detection of a banknote.
  • Neural networks and algorithms are also suitable for detection of patterns characteristic of banknotes, as illustrated by European patent EP 731,961, etc.
  • In the present assignee's prior applications (e.g. 08/649,419, 09/074,034, 09/127,502, 60/082,228) techniques are disclosed for marking security documents with generally imperceptible, or steganographic, watermark data, so as to facilitate later identification of such documents. By employing digital watermark-based banknote detection in combination with visible feature-based banknote detection, very high confidence recognition of banknote data can be achieved.
  • The artisan is presumed to be familiar with the various approaches for recognizing banknotes from image data, of which the foregoing is just a sampling.
  • While such banknote-detection techniques are commonly implemented in resource-intensive form, using sophisticated processing units (e.g. the main CPU of a copier), this need not be the case. To reduce the resource requirements, the detection algorithm can be tailored to operate on parts of scan-line data, without buffering the entire set of image data for analysis. The algorithm can be implemented on less-sophisticated processors, such as those used in the scanner 18 or the printer 20. The processors can be programmed, by appropriate firmware, to perform such processing on any image data scanned by, or printed by, such devices. And as modems and other interfaces (SCSI, FireWire, IDE, ATAPI, etc.) continue their evolution from dedicated hardware to software-based implementations, their data processing capabilities increase commensurately. Thus, for example, software-implemented modems, network interfaces, UARTs, etc., can monitor the data traffic passing therethrough and flag any that appears to be banknote-related. The full analysis operation can be performed by the interface, or the data can be copied and passed to the main processor for further analysis.
  • In the preferred embodiment of the present invention, when banknote image data is detected, storage of forensic data is triggered. The forensic data typically includes at least the date (and optionally the time) at which the possibly illicit action occurred. Additionally, the forensic data can include the file name of the banknote image data (if available), and a code indicating the nature of the event noted (e.g., banknote data detected by the printer; banknote data detected passing through the modem on COM2; banknote data detected written to removable media having volume ID 01FF38; banknote data detected in file opened by Adobe Photoshop, etc.) The forensic data can additionally detail the source from which the data came, and/or the destination to which it was sent (e.g. IP/email addresses). In operating systems requiring user login, the stored forensic data will typically include the use ID. System status data can also be included, e.g. identifying peripheral devices attached to the system, code loaded into RAM memory, the amount of time the user spent working on the illicit data, etc. Selected data from any operating system registry database (e.g. identifying the registered owner of certain applications software then-loaded on the computer, software serial numbers, operational parameters, etc.) can likewise be included. If the computer is on a network or on the Internet, the network address, Ethernet MAC address, AppleTalk name and zone, TraceRoute information, or IP address information can be stored. If the illicit action has been detected by reference to a watermark or other embedded data, payload data recovered from the watermark can be included in the forensic tracer data.
  • On one extreme, the foregoing (and possibly more) information can be stored in detailed forensic tracer records. At the other extreme, the forensic tracer record can comprise a single bit indicating that the computer system has been used—at least once—for a possibly illicit action.
  • Expecting that savvy counterfeiters will attempt to defeat such forensic tracer data, such data is desirably generated, transmitted, and stored redundantly, transparently, and inconspicuously.
  • Redundant generation of the tracer data refers to detection of possibly illicit activity at various points in the computer system, and/or during various operations. Referring to FIG. 2, possibly illicit activity can be detected, e.g., during scanning of an image, printing of a document, receiving or transmitting a file through a modem connection, opening a file with an application program, saving a file with an application program, copying data to a clipboard, etc. By providing multiple opportunities for detection of possibly illicit activities, the robustness of the system is increased.
  • Redundant transmission of the tracer data refers to its transmission to storage media several times. When a possibly illicit activity is detected, it desirable to send tracer data to storage both immediately and on a delayed basis (e.g. five minutes after detection of banknote data, and every two minutes thereafter for a period of M minutes). By sending the data to storage repeatedly, the robustness of the system is again increased.
  • Redundant storage of the tracer data refers to its storage at several different locations (simultaneously or sequentially).
  • If even one instance of the redundantly generated/transmitted/stored tracer data survives the counterfeiter's attempts to redact incriminating data, it will be useful evidence in any prosecution.
  • Transparent generation/transmission/storage means that the acts associated with these operations will not arouse the counterfeiter's suspicion.
  • Various software tools are available to trace program execution. A savvy counterfeiter may employ such tools to monitor all disk writes performed by his system. Consider, for example, a counterfeiter using an image processing program in aid of his counterfeiting. The person may monitor the sequence of files opened and closed (and/or the data read/written) during use of the program for image processing with non-banknote data, and then be suspicious if different files, or in different orders, are opened and closed when performing the same image processing operations on banknote data. Thus, at least some of the forensic data should be stored using routine operations and routine files (e.g. writes to files that are used during normal program execution). Of course, such tracer data should be written in a manner assuring that the data will persist—either in the location originally written, or by copying during subsequent machine operation (e.g. on closing the application program, shutting down the operating system, etc.) to a location assuring longer-term availability.
  • Program-tracing tools typically monitor just the computer's main CPU so—where possible—at least some of the tracer data should be stored under the control of a different processing element, or in a location to which the tool's capabilities do not extend. Another option is to keep at least some of the tracer data in RAM memory for a period after the illicit action has been detected, and store it later.
  • Yet another option is to store at least some forensic tracer records in the operating system registry database. This resource is commonly accessed during system operation, so references to the database may not give rise to suspicion.
  • Inconspicuous storage covers a wide range of options. One is that the data be encrypted. This assures that simple disk-scanning operations attempting to find byte strings likely associated with tracer data will be unsuccessful. (Numerous encryption techniques are known, e.g. RSA, PGP, various private key techniques, etc., any of which can be used.)
  • Encrypted tracer data can be stored with other encrypted system data, such as in a password file. Due to its encrypted nature, a hacker may not be able to discern what part of the stored data is tracer data and what part is, e.g., password data. Attempts to redact the tracer data risks corrupting the password data, jeopardizing the counterfeiter's later ability to login to the machine.
  • Another possibility is to steganographically encode the tracer data, e.g. by randomizing/obfuscating same and inconspicuously hiding it amidst other data (e.g. within graphic or audio files associated with start-up or shut-down of the computer operating system, or wherever else noise-like data can be introduced without alerting the user to its presence). Still another possibility is to create null code that resembles normal instructions or data, but instead serves as a forensic tracer record.
  • To avoid creation of telltale new files in the non-volatile memory, the tracer data can be patched into existing files, by appending to the end or otherwise. Or, rather than storing the tracer data as the content of a file, the data can be stored among a file's “properties.”
  • Another way to avoid creating new files is to avoid using the computer's “file system” altogether, and instead use low-level programming to effect direct writes to typically-unused or reserved physical areas on the disk. By such techniques, the data is resident on the disk, but does not appear in any directory listing. (While such data may be lost if disk optimization tools are subsequently used, those skilled in the art will recognize that steps can be taken to minimize such risks.)
  • Yet another way to avoid creating new files is to relay at least some of the tracer data to outside the computer. One expedient is to use an external interface to transmit the data for remote storage. Again, a great variety of techniques can be employed to reliably, yet effectively, effect such transmission. And the data transmission need not occur at the moment the possibly illicit action is occurring. Instead, such data can be queued and relayed away from the machine at a later time.
  • Still another way to avoid creating new files is to make use of deadwood files that commonly exist on most computers. For example, application programs typically employ installation utilities which copy compressed files onto the disk, together with code to decompress and install the software. These compressed files and installation programs are usually not deleted, providing opportunities for their use as repositories of tracer data. Similarly, many computers include dozens or hundreds of duplicate files—only one of which is commonly used. By converting one or more of these files to use as a repository for tracer data, additional inconspicuous storage can be achieved.
  • Some application programs include hundreds of files, various of which are provided just for the occasional use of the rare super-user. Files that pass some litmus test of inactivity (e.g. not ever used, or not accessed for at least two years) might serve as tracer data repositories. (Disk utilities are available to determine when a given file was last accessed.) Yet another option is to append data to an application's Help files, or other binary data files used to save program state information for the application.
  • Resort may also be made to various of the known techniques employed in computer viruses to generate, transmit, store and disseminate/replicate the forensic tracer data in manners that escape common detection. Moreover, such virus techniques can be used to initially spread and install the functionality detailed above (i.e. pattern recognition, and tracer data generation/transmission/storage) onto computers without such capabilities.
  • Some embodiments may perform self-integrity checks of old tracer records each time a new banknote is encountered, and repair any damage encountered. Similarly, old tracer records can be expanded to detail new illicit acts, in addition to (or in lieu of) creating independent records for each illicit act.
  • Various tools can be used to replicate/propagate forensic tracer records to further infest the system with incriminating evidence. Utility software such as disk defragmenters, disk integrity checks, virus checkers, and other periodically-executed system maintenance tools can be written/patched to look in some of the places where forensic tracer records may be found and, if any are encountered, copy them to additional locations. Similar operations can be performed upon termination of selected application programs (e.g. image processing programs).
  • The foregoing is just the tip of the iceberg. Those skilled in the arts of computer programming, operating system design, disk utilities, peripheral firmware development, packet data transport, data compression, etc., etc., will each recognize many different opportunities that might be exploited to effect surreptitious, reliable banknote detection, and transmission, storage, and/or replication of tracer data. Again, if even one tracer record persists when the computer is searched by suitably-authorized law enforcement officials, incriminating evidence may be obtained. The high odds against ridding a computer of all incriminating data should serve as a deterrent against the computer's use for illegal purposes in the first place.
  • As noted, the computer system desirably includes several checkpoints for detecting illicit actions. In the case of banknote image processing, for example, detectors can be implemented in some or all of the following: in image processing software applications, in DLLs commonly used with image processing, in printer drivers, in printer firmware, in scanner drivers, in scanner firmware, in modem or other external interface drivers and software, in email software, in FTP software, in the operating system (looking at the clipboard, etc.), etc., etc. Similarly, where practical, the checking should be done by several different processors (e.g. main CPU, programmable interface chips, scanner microcontroller, printer microprocessor, etc.).
  • From the foregoing, it will be recognized that techniques according to the present invention can be used to discourage counterfeiting, and to aid in its prosecution when encountered. Moreover, this approach obviates the prior art approach of marking all color photocopies with tracer data, with its accompanying privacy and first amendment entanglements.
  • Having described and illustrated the principles of our invention with reference to an illustrative embodiment and several variations thereon, it should be recognized that the invention can be modified in arrangement and detail without departing from such principles.
  • For example, while the detailed embodiment has focused on a computer system, the same techniques can likewise be employed in stand-alone color copiers, etc.
  • Similarly, while the detailed embodiment has focused on counterfeiting, it will be recognized that computers can be employed in various other illicit or unauthorized activities. Each generally is susceptible to computer-detection (e.g. threats against the president may be detected by specialized natural language analysis programs; computer-aided synthesis of illegal drugs may be indicated by certain chemical modeling instructions in software specific to that industry; unauthorized duplication of copyrighted works may be flagged by the presence of embedded watermark data in the copyrighted work; unauthorized distribution of classified or confidential business documents may be detected using known techniques, etc.). The storage of forensic tracer data along the lines detailed above is equally applicable in such other contexts.
  • In the future, support for illicit activity detection may be routinely provided in a wide variety of software and peripherals. In one embodiment, the software and peripherals may include generic services supporting the compilation of forensic tracer data, its encryption, transmission, storage, etc. These generic services can be invoked by detector modules that are customized to the particular illicit/unauthorized activity of concern. Some of the detector modules can be fairly generic too, e.g. generic pattern recognition or watermark detection services. These can be customized by data loaded into the computer (either at manufacture, or surreptitiously accompanying new or updated software) identifying particular images whose reproduction is unauthorized/illicit. As new banknotes are issued, updated customization data can be distributed. (Naturally, such detector customization data will need to be loaded and stored in a manner that is resistant against attack, e.g. using the approaches outlined above for the covert tracer data.)
  • While the invention is described in the context of an end-user computer, the principles are equally applicable in other contexts, e.g. in server computers. Moreover, the principles are not limited to use in general purpose personal computers but can also be applied in other computer devices, e.g. digital cameras, personal digital assistants, set-top boxes, handheld devices, firewalls, routers, etc.
  • Although not belabored above, it will be understood that law enforcement agencies will have software recovery tools that can be employed on suspect computer systems to recover whatever forensic tracer data may persist. Briefly, such tools know where to look for tracer data and, when encountered, know how to interpret the stored records. After analyzing the non-volatile stores associated with a suspect computer system, the recovery software will report the results. The implementation of such tools is well within the capabilities of an artisan.
  • While the foregoing disclosure has focused exclusively on the storage of forensic tracer data as the response to a possibly-illicit action, more typically this is just one of several responses that would occur. Others are detailed in the previously-referenced documents (e.g. disabling output, hiding tracer data (e.g. as in U.S. Pat. No. 5,557,742, or using steganographically encoded digital watermark data) in the output, telephoning law enforcement officials, etc.).
  • To provide a comprehensive disclosure without unduly lengthening this specification, applicants incorporate by reference the patent applications and documents referenced above. By so doing, applicants mean to teach that the systems, elements, and methods taught in such documents find application in combination with the techniques disclosed herein. The particular implementation details of such combinations are not belabored here, being within the skill of the routineer in the relevant arts.
  • In view of the many possible embodiments in which the principles of our invention may be realized, it should be recognized that the detailed embodiments are illustrative only and should not be taken as limiting the scope of our invention. Rather, we claim as our invention all such modifications, combinations, and implementations as may come within the scope and spirit of the following claims, and equivalents thereof.

Claims (20)

1. A method comprising:
obtaining access to a set of data corresponding to an image or video;
controlling a steganographic encoding detector to examine only a portion of the data, without examining the entire set of data,
detecting plural-bit data from the portion of the data.
2. The method of claim 1 wherein the set of data comprises scan-line data and the act of detecting operates on only a portion of the scan-line data, without buffering the entire set of data for analysis.
3. The method of claim 1 further comprising carrying out an action based on the detected plural-bit data.
4. A method comprising:
obtaining data representing content;
analyzing the data to determine whether a steganographic signal is encoded therein, the steganographic signal being encoded in the data through modifications to the data, the modifications being made so as to conceal the presence of the steganographic signal to a causal human observer of the content;
upon detection of the steganographic signal, redundantly carrying out an action that is concealed from a user of the content.
5. The method of claim 4 wherein the content comprises an image or video.
6. The method of claim 4 wherein the steganographic signal comprises an identifier, and the action comprising transmitting at least the identifier.
7. The method of claim 6 wherein the identifier is transmitted to a remote device.
8. The method of claim 4 wherein the steganographic signal comprises an identifier, and the action comprising generating data.
9. The method of claim 4 wherein the steganographic signal comprises an identifier, and said action comprising storing data.
10. The method of claim 9 wherein the data is remotely stored.
11. The method of claim 4 wherein the steganographic signal indicates a possible use of a device for an illicit activity.
12. The method of claim 11 wherein the action comprises storing or generating forensic data to identify the possible use or the illicit activity.
13. A method comprising:
processing data representing content;
analyzing the data to determine whether a plural-bit identifier is steganographically encoded therein, the plural-bit identifier encoded in the data through modifications to the data, the modifications steganographically hiding the plural-bit identifier;
upon detection of the plural-bit identifier, redundantly carrying out an action while attempting to conceal the action from one or more users of the content.
14. The method of claim 13 wherein the action comprising transmitting at least the plural-bit identifier.
15. The method of claim 14 wherein the plural-bit identifier is transmitted to a remote device.
16. The method of claim 13 wherein the action comprises generating data.
17. The method of claim 13 wherein the action comprises storing data.
18. The method of claim 13 wherein the plural-bit signal indicates a possible use of a device for an illicit activity.
19. The method of claim 18 wherein the action comprises storing or generating forensic data to identify the possible use or the illicit activity.
20. The method of claim 13 wherein the content comprises an image or video.
US11/622,373 1998-11-03 2007-01-11 Methods utilizing steganography Expired - Lifetime US8290202B2 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US11/622,373 US8290202B2 (en) 1998-11-03 2007-01-11 Methods utilizing steganography

Applications Claiming Priority (6)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US09/185,380 US6549638B2 (en) 1998-11-03 1998-11-03 Methods for evidencing illicit use of a computer system or device
US11295598P 1998-12-18 1998-12-18
US46541899A 1999-12-16 1999-12-16
US10/367,092 US7113615B2 (en) 1993-11-18 2003-02-13 Watermark embedder and reader
US10/639,598 US20060028689A1 (en) 1996-11-12 2003-08-11 Document management with embedded data
US11/622,373 US8290202B2 (en) 1998-11-03 2007-01-11 Methods utilizing steganography

Related Parent Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US10/639,598 Continuation-In-Part US20060028689A1 (en) 1996-11-12 2003-08-11 Document management with embedded data

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
US20070180251A1 true US20070180251A1 (en) 2007-08-02
US8290202B2 US8290202B2 (en) 2012-10-16

Family

ID=38323529

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US11/622,373 Expired - Lifetime US8290202B2 (en) 1998-11-03 2007-01-11 Methods utilizing steganography

Country Status (1)

Country Link
US (1) US8290202B2 (en)

Cited By (40)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20080253740A1 (en) * 1994-10-21 2008-10-16 Rhoads Geoffrey B Apparatus and Methods to Process Video or Audio
US20100119108A1 (en) * 1998-04-16 2010-05-13 Rhoads Geoffrey B Methods and Arrangements for Composing Information-Carrying Artwork
US7865957B1 (en) * 2007-02-26 2011-01-04 Trend Micro Inc. Apparatus and methods for updating mobile device virus pattern data
US7916354B2 (en) 1993-11-18 2011-03-29 Digimarc Corporation Hiding and detecting auxiliary data in media materials and signals
US7974439B2 (en) 1993-11-18 2011-07-05 Digimarc Corporation Embedding hidden auxiliary information in media
US7974495B2 (en) 2002-06-10 2011-07-05 Digimarc Corporation Identification and protection of video
US7987094B2 (en) 1993-11-18 2011-07-26 Digimarc Corporation Audio encoding to convey auxiliary information, and decoding of same
US7991184B2 (en) 1995-05-08 2011-08-02 Digimarc Corporation Apparatus to process images and video
US8006092B2 (en) 2001-01-24 2011-08-23 Digimarc Corporation Digital watermarks for checking authenticity of printed objects
US8014563B2 (en) 1994-10-21 2011-09-06 Digimarc Corporation Methods and systems for steganographic processing
US8014562B2 (en) 1998-04-16 2011-09-06 Digimarc Corporation Signal processing of audio and video data, including deriving identifying information
US8041074B2 (en) 1998-04-16 2011-10-18 Digimarc Corporation Content indexing and searching using content identifiers and associated metadata
US8045748B2 (en) 2000-03-18 2011-10-25 Digimarc Corporation Watermark embedding functions adapted for transmission channels
US8051169B2 (en) 2000-03-18 2011-11-01 Digimarc Corporation Methods and systems useful in linking from objects to remote resources
US8051294B2 (en) 1993-11-18 2011-11-01 Digimarc Corporation Methods for audio watermarking and decoding
US8051295B2 (en) 2001-04-20 2011-11-01 Digimarc Corporation Benchmarks for digital watermarking
US8059860B2 (en) 1998-04-16 2011-11-15 Brundage Trent J Steganographic encoding
US8059858B2 (en) 1998-11-19 2011-11-15 Digimarc Corporation Identification document and related methods
US8078697B2 (en) 1995-05-08 2011-12-13 Digimarc Corporation Network linking methods and apparatus
US8116516B2 (en) 1995-05-08 2012-02-14 Digimarc Corporation Controlling use of audio or image content
US8126272B2 (en) 2000-05-02 2012-02-28 Digimarc Corporation Methods combining multiple frames of image data
US8131760B2 (en) 2000-07-20 2012-03-06 Digimarc Corporation Using object identifiers with content distribution
US8144368B2 (en) 1998-01-20 2012-03-27 Digimarc Coporation Automated methods for distinguishing copies from original printed objects
US8144924B2 (en) 1995-05-08 2012-03-27 Digimarc Corporation Content objects with computer instructions steganographically encoded therein, and associated methods
US8175329B2 (en) 2000-04-17 2012-05-08 Digimarc Corporation Authentication of physical and electronic media objects using digital watermarks
US8204222B2 (en) 1993-11-18 2012-06-19 Digimarc Corporation Steganographic encoding and decoding of auxiliary codes in media signals
US8280101B2 (en) 1995-08-09 2012-10-02 Digimarc Corporation Identification documents and authentication of such documents
US8301893B2 (en) 2003-08-13 2012-10-30 Digimarc Corporation Detecting media areas likely of hosting watermarks
US8312168B2 (en) 2000-03-18 2012-11-13 Digimarc Corporation Methods for linking from objects to remote resources
US8411898B2 (en) 1995-05-08 2013-04-02 Digimarc Corporation Digital authentication with analog documents
US8447067B2 (en) 1999-05-19 2013-05-21 Digimarc Corporation Location-based arrangements employing mobile devices
US8505108B2 (en) 1993-11-18 2013-08-06 Digimarc Corporation Authentication using a digital watermark
US8515121B2 (en) 2002-01-18 2013-08-20 Digimarc Corporation Arrangement of objects in images or graphics to convey a machine-readable signal
US8769297B2 (en) 1996-04-25 2014-07-01 Digimarc Corporation Method for increasing the functionality of a media player/recorder device or an application program
CN104010193A (en) * 2014-05-29 2014-08-27 中国科学院信息工程研究所 Video steganographic method based on macro block partition mode disturbance
US8825518B2 (en) 2000-12-21 2014-09-02 Digimarc Corporation Media methods and systems
US20140373167A1 (en) * 2012-08-09 2014-12-18 Nippon Telegraph And Telephone Corporation Trace center apparatus and method for enabling contents to be traced
US9630443B2 (en) 1995-07-27 2017-04-25 Digimarc Corporation Printer driver separately applying watermark and information
CN109963159A (en) * 2019-01-16 2019-07-02 中山大学 A kind of information steganography algorithm of the dual disturbance scoring of bianry image based on STC coding
US20210271756A1 (en) * 2019-01-08 2021-09-02 Intsights Cyber Intelligence Ltd. System and method for detecting leaked documents on a computer network

Families Citing this family (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US9185083B1 (en) 2013-05-23 2015-11-10 The Boeing Company Concealing data within encoded audio signals
US9542714B2 (en) * 2015-05-28 2017-01-10 The Boeing Company Concealing data within images
US9680844B2 (en) 2015-07-06 2017-06-13 Bank Of America Corporation Automation of collection of forensic evidence

Citations (68)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4807031A (en) * 1987-10-20 1989-02-21 Interactive Systems, Incorporated Interactive video method and apparatus
US4908873A (en) * 1983-05-13 1990-03-13 Philibert Alex C Document reproduction security system
US4930160A (en) * 1987-09-02 1990-05-29 Vogel Peter S Automatic censorship of video programs
US5416307A (en) * 1993-09-03 1995-05-16 Danek; Robert Currency paper verification and denomination device
US5481377A (en) * 1991-03-29 1996-01-02 Canon Kabushiki Kaisha Image processing with anti-forgery function
US5483658A (en) * 1993-02-26 1996-01-09 Grube; Gary W. Detection of unauthorized use of software applications in processing devices
US5483602A (en) * 1992-08-20 1996-01-09 Gao Gesellschaft Fur Automation Und Organisation Mbh Method and apparatus for detecting printed images on documents by testing for the presence in the images of structural elements having defined regularities which are recognizable by the eye and common to a variety of documents
US5485213A (en) * 1993-09-17 1996-01-16 Fujitsu Limited Method and apparatus for encoding and decoding image data
US5499294A (en) * 1993-11-24 1996-03-12 The United States Of America As Represented By The Administrator Of The National Aeronautics And Space Administration Digital camera with apparatus for authentication of images produced from an image file
US5515451A (en) * 1992-01-08 1996-05-07 Fuji Xerox Co., Ltd. Image processing system for selectively reproducing documents
US5602906A (en) * 1993-04-30 1997-02-11 Sprint Communications Company L.P. Toll fraud detection system
US5610688A (en) * 1993-11-05 1997-03-11 Sharp Kabushiki Kaisha Image forming apparatus having illegal use prevention
US5613004A (en) * 1995-06-07 1997-03-18 The Dice Company Steganographic method and device
US5710636A (en) * 1995-06-05 1998-01-20 Xerox Corporation Method and apparatus for generating halftone images having human readable patterns formed therein
US5727092A (en) * 1995-05-17 1998-03-10 The Regents Of The University Of California Compression embedding
US5739864A (en) * 1994-08-24 1998-04-14 Macrovision Corporation Apparatus for inserting blanked formatted fingerprint data (source ID, time/date) in to a video signal
US5745604A (en) * 1993-11-18 1998-04-28 Digimarc Corporation Identification/authentication system using robust, distributed coding
US5748763A (en) * 1993-11-18 1998-05-05 Digimarc Corporation Image steganography system featuring perceptually adaptive and globally scalable signal embedding
US5751854A (en) * 1992-08-03 1998-05-12 Ricoh Company, Ltd. Original-discrimination system for discriminating special document, and image forming apparatus, image processing apparatus and duplicator using the original-discrimination system
US5752152A (en) * 1996-02-08 1998-05-12 Eastman Kodak Company Copy restrictive system
US5892900A (en) * 1996-08-30 1999-04-06 Intertrust Technologies Corp. Systems and methods for secure transaction management and electronic rights protection
US5901224A (en) * 1996-10-21 1999-05-04 Xerox Corporation Quasi-reprographics with variable embedded data with applications to copyright management, and distribution control
US5905800A (en) * 1996-01-17 1999-05-18 The Dice Company Method and system for digital watermarking
US5905810A (en) * 1990-02-05 1999-05-18 Cummins-Allison Corp. Automatic currency processing system
US6182218B1 (en) * 1994-12-13 2001-01-30 Mitsubishi Corporation Digital content management system using electronic watermark
US6185321B1 (en) * 1997-01-21 2001-02-06 Sharp Kabushiki Kaisha Image forming system
US6185312B1 (en) * 1997-01-28 2001-02-06 Nippon Telegraph And Telephone Corporation Method for embedding and reading watermark-information in digital form, and apparatus thereof
US6216228B1 (en) * 1997-04-23 2001-04-10 International Business Machines Corporation Controlling video or image presentation according to encoded content classification information within the video or image data
US6233684B1 (en) * 1997-02-28 2001-05-15 Contenaguard Holdings, Inc. System for controlling the distribution and use of rendered digital works through watermaking
US6345104B1 (en) * 1994-03-17 2002-02-05 Digimarc Corporation Digital watermarks and methods for security documents
US20020021824A1 (en) * 1995-05-08 2002-02-21 Reed Alastair M. Low visibility watermarks using an out-of-phase color
US20020021825A1 (en) * 1994-10-21 2002-02-21 Rhoads Geoffrey B. Methods for identifying equipment used in counterfeiting
US20020039314A1 (en) * 2000-10-03 2002-04-04 Pioneer Corporation Information recording apparatus, information recording method, and information recording medium in which information recording program is computer-readably recorded
US20020041686A1 (en) * 2000-05-10 2002-04-11 Pioneer Corporation Copyright protecting method, recording method, recording apparatus, reproduction method and reproduction apparatus
US6384935B1 (en) * 1997-02-28 2002-05-07 Canon Kabushiki Kaisha Image process apparatus, image process method and storage medium
US20020054317A1 (en) * 2000-08-25 2002-05-09 Fuji Xerox Co., Ltd. Image data outputting apparatus and image data outputting method
US20020054692A1 (en) * 2000-01-31 2002-05-09 Takashi Suzuki Image processing system
US20020056118A1 (en) * 1999-08-27 2002-05-09 Hunter Charles Eric Video and music distribution system
US20020054356A1 (en) * 1992-09-28 2002-05-09 Mitsuru Kurita Image processing apparatus and method using image information and additional information or an additional pattern added thereto or superposed thereon
US20020056081A1 (en) * 1999-12-02 2002-05-09 Qualcomm Incorporated Apparatus and method for decoding digital image and audio signals
US6389055B1 (en) * 1998-03-30 2002-05-14 Lucent Technologies, Inc. Integrating digital data with perceptible signals
US6389151B1 (en) * 1995-08-09 2002-05-14 Digimarc Corporation Printing and validation of self validating security documents
US20020059238A1 (en) * 1994-09-30 2002-05-16 Mitsubishi Corporation Data management system
US6519352B2 (en) * 1994-10-21 2003-02-11 Digimarc Corporation Encoding and decoding in accordance with steganographically-conveyed data
US6535618B1 (en) * 1994-10-21 2003-03-18 Digimarc Corporation Image capture device with steganographic data embedding
US6549638B2 (en) * 1998-11-03 2003-04-15 Digimarc Corporation Methods for evidencing illicit use of a computer system or device
US6556688B1 (en) * 1999-03-15 2003-04-29 Seiko Epson Corporation Watermarking with random zero-mean patches for printer tracking
US20030084284A1 (en) * 2001-10-24 2003-05-01 Satoshi Ando Data distribution system, sending device, receiving device, data distribution method, sending method, receiving method, recording medium on which data preparation program is recorded and recording medium on which data assembling program is recorded
US6567535B2 (en) * 1993-11-18 2003-05-20 Digimarc Corporation Steganographic system with changing operations
US20040057581A1 (en) * 1993-11-18 2004-03-25 Rhoads Geoffrey B. Method and apparatus for transaction card security utilizing embedded image data
US6738495B2 (en) * 1995-05-08 2004-05-18 Digimarc Corporation Watermarking enhanced to withstand anticipated corruptions
US20050025463A1 (en) * 2003-06-20 2005-02-03 Bloom Jeffrey Adam Method and apparatus for creating multiple unique copies of content
US6870573B2 (en) * 1999-01-22 2005-03-22 Intel Corporation Method and apparatus for dynamically generating a visual program summary from a multi-source video feed
US6882738B2 (en) * 1994-03-17 2005-04-19 Digimarc Corporation Methods and tangible objects employing textured machine readable data
US20050111047A1 (en) * 1995-07-27 2005-05-26 Rhoads Geoffrey B. Printer driver separately applying watermark and information
US6993152B2 (en) * 1994-03-17 2006-01-31 Digimarc Corporation Hiding geo-location data through arrangement of objects
US20060028689A1 (en) * 1996-11-12 2006-02-09 Perry Burt W Document management with embedded data
US20060031684A1 (en) * 2004-08-06 2006-02-09 Sharma Ravi K Fast signal detection and distributed computing in portable computing devices
US20060062386A1 (en) * 1993-11-18 2006-03-23 Rhoads Geoffrey B Steganographic encoding and decoding of auxiliary codes in media signals
US7020304B2 (en) * 2002-01-22 2006-03-28 Digimarc Corporation Digital watermarking and fingerprinting including synchronization, layering, version control, and compressed embedding
US20060075244A1 (en) * 2004-07-30 2006-04-06 Robert Schumann Tracing content usage
US7054462B2 (en) * 1995-05-08 2006-05-30 Digimarc Corporation Inferring object status based on detected watermark data
US20070016790A1 (en) * 1998-11-19 2007-01-18 Brundage Trent J Identification document and related methods
US7321667B2 (en) * 2002-01-18 2008-01-22 Digimarc Corporation Data hiding through arrangement of objects
US7340076B2 (en) * 2001-05-10 2008-03-04 Digimarc Corporation Digital watermarks for unmanned vehicle navigation
US20100008536A1 (en) * 1994-10-21 2010-01-14 Rhoads Geoffrey B Methods and Systems for Steganographic Processing
US20100027969A1 (en) * 2002-06-10 2010-02-04 Alattar Adnan M Identification and protection of video
US7676059B2 (en) * 1994-10-21 2010-03-09 Digimarc Corporation Video steganography or encoding

Family Cites Families (90)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4297729A (en) 1977-11-24 1981-10-27 Emi Limited Encoding and decoding of digital recordings
EP0067998B1 (en) 1980-09-26 1986-04-16 Bo LÖFBERG Method for processing an information signal and means for carrying out the method
US4547804A (en) 1983-03-21 1985-10-15 Greenberg Burton L Method and apparatus for the automatic identification and verification of commercial broadcast programs
US5040059A (en) 1987-08-03 1991-08-13 Vexcel Corporation Method and apparatus of image mensuration with selectively visible and invisible reseau grid marks
US4969041A (en) 1988-09-23 1990-11-06 Dubner Computer Systems, Inc. Embedment of data in a video signal
US5652802A (en) 1990-02-05 1997-07-29 Cummins-Allison Corp. Method and apparatus for document identification
US5790693A (en) 1990-02-05 1998-08-04 Cummins-Allison Corp. Currency discriminator and authenticator
US5790697A (en) 1990-02-05 1998-08-04 Cummins-Allion Corp. Method and apparatus for discriminating and counting documents
EP0506479B1 (en) 1991-03-29 1997-02-12 Canon Kabushiki Kaisha Image processing apparatus
FR2681997A1 (en) 1991-09-30 1993-04-02 Arbitron Cy METHOD AND DEVICE FOR AUTOMATICALLY IDENTIFYING A PROGRAM COMPRISING A SOUND SIGNAL
US5987127A (en) 1992-06-30 1999-11-16 Minolta Co., Ltd. Image forming apparatus and copy management system
US5671277A (en) 1992-06-30 1997-09-23 Minolta Camera Kabushiki Kaisha Image forming apparatus and copy management system
US5377269A (en) 1992-10-29 1994-12-27 Intelligent Security Systems, Inc. Security access and monitoring system for personal computer
EP1494374B1 (en) 1992-11-16 2013-09-18 Arbitron Inc. Method and apparatus for encoding/decoding brodcast or recorded segments and monitoring audience exposure thereto
US5351287A (en) 1992-12-11 1994-09-27 Bell Communications Research, Inc. Method and apparatus for data evidence collection
US5469222A (en) 1992-12-23 1995-11-21 Intel Corporation Non-linear pixel interpolator function for video and graphic processing
US6621922B2 (en) 1993-07-30 2003-09-16 Canon Kabushiki Kaisha Image processing system and electronic apparatuses
DE69417661T2 (en) 1993-09-03 1999-11-11 Toshiba Kawasaki Kk Device for the steganographic insertion of information into color images
US5436974A (en) 1993-10-12 1995-07-25 Innovator Corporation Method of encoding confidentiality markings
CA2129075C (en) 1993-10-18 1999-04-20 Joseph J. Daniele Electronic copyright royalty accounting system using glyphs
US5822436A (en) 1996-04-25 1998-10-13 Digimarc Corporation Photographic products and methods employing embedded information
US6580819B1 (en) 1993-11-18 2003-06-17 Digimarc Corporation Methods of producing security documents having digitally encoded data and documents employing same
US5636292C1 (en) 1995-05-08 2002-06-18 Digimarc Corp Steganography methods employing embedded calibration data
US6757406B2 (en) 1993-11-18 2004-06-29 Digimarc Corporation Steganographic image processing
US6408082B1 (en) 1996-04-25 2002-06-18 Digimarc Corporation Watermark detection using a fourier mellin transform
US6574350B1 (en) 1995-05-08 2003-06-03 Digimarc Corporation Digital watermarking employing both frail and robust watermarks
WO1995014289A2 (en) 1993-11-18 1995-05-26 Pinecone Imaging Corporation Identification/authentication coding method and apparatus
US7113615B2 (en) 1993-11-18 2006-09-26 Digimarc Corporation Watermark embedder and reader
US7720249B2 (en) 1993-11-18 2010-05-18 Digimarc Corporation Watermark embedder and reader
US5557742A (en) 1994-03-07 1996-09-17 Haystack Labs, Inc. Method and system for detecting intrusion into and misuse of a data processing system
US8144368B2 (en) 1998-01-20 2012-03-27 Digimarc Coporation Automated methods for distinguishing copies from original printed objects
US20020136429A1 (en) 1994-03-17 2002-09-26 John Stach Data hiding through arrangement of objects
US7286684B2 (en) 1994-03-17 2007-10-23 Digimarc Corporation Secure document design carrying auxiliary machine readable information
JP3078442B2 (en) 1994-03-29 2000-08-21 シャープ株式会社 Image processing device forgery prevention device
US5450490A (en) 1994-03-31 1995-09-12 The Arbitron Company Apparatus and methods for including codes in audio signals and decoding
US5568550A (en) 1994-10-05 1996-10-22 Shmuel Ur Method and system for identifying documents generated by an unauthorized software copy
US5533144A (en) 1994-10-17 1996-07-02 Xerox Corporation Anti-counterfeit pattern detector and method
US6778682B2 (en) 1994-10-21 2004-08-17 Digimarc Corporation Redundantly embedding auxiliary data in source signals
US5646997A (en) 1994-12-14 1997-07-08 Barton; James M. Method and apparatus for embedding authentication information within digital data
US5943422A (en) 1996-08-12 1999-08-24 Intertrust Technologies Corp. Steganographic techniques for securely delivering electronic digital rights management control information over insecure communication channels
DE69637799D1 (en) 1995-02-13 2009-02-12 Intertrust Tech Corp Systems and procedures for secure transaction management and electronic legal protection
US5774452A (en) 1995-03-14 1998-06-30 Aris Technologies, Inc. Apparatus and method for encoding and decoding information in audio signals
FR2732532B1 (en) 1995-03-29 1997-06-20 Lahmi Paul David SECURE PROCESS FOR REPRODUCING SENSITIVE DOCUMENTS
US7555139B2 (en) 1995-05-08 2009-06-30 Digimarc Corporation Secure documents with hidden signals, and related methods and systems
US20090097695A9 (en) 1995-05-08 2009-04-16 Rhoads Geoffrey B Personal document authentication system using watermarking
US6760463B2 (en) 1995-05-08 2004-07-06 Digimarc Corporation Watermarking methods and media
US7224819B2 (en) 1995-05-08 2007-05-29 Digimarc Corporation Integrating digital watermarks in multimedia content
US6728390B2 (en) 1995-05-08 2004-04-27 Digimarc Corporation Methods and systems using multiple watermarks
US20030133592A1 (en) 1996-05-07 2003-07-17 Rhoads Geoffrey B. Content objects with computer instructions steganographically encoded therein, and associated methods
US7711564B2 (en) 1995-07-27 2010-05-04 Digimarc Corporation Connected audio and other media objects
US5822360A (en) 1995-09-06 1998-10-13 Solana Technology Development Corporation Method and apparatus for transporting auxiliary data in audio signals
US5838814A (en) 1996-01-02 1998-11-17 Moore; Steven Jerome Security check method and apparatus
US20030056103A1 (en) 2000-12-18 2003-03-20 Levy Kenneth L. Audio/video commerce application architectural framework
US5761686A (en) 1996-06-27 1998-06-02 Xerox Corporation Embedding encoded information in an iconic version of a text image
US5974548A (en) 1996-07-12 1999-10-26 Novell, Inc. Media-independent document security method and apparatus
CN1294568C (en) 1996-12-19 2007-01-10 松下电器产业株式会社 Optical disk recording reproducing device
JP3172475B2 (en) 1996-12-26 2001-06-04 日本アイ・ビー・エム株式会社 Data hiding method and data extraction method using statistical test
CA2227381C (en) 1997-02-14 2001-05-29 Nec Corporation Image data encoding system and image inputting apparatus
US6073123A (en) 1997-02-26 2000-06-06 Staley; Clinton A. Method and apparatus for detecting unauthorized copies of software
US6131162A (en) 1997-06-05 2000-10-10 Hitachi Ltd. Digital data authentication method
US6256110B1 (en) 1997-06-11 2001-07-03 Canon Kabushiki Kaisha Image processing apparatus and method and storage medium
KR100323441B1 (en) 1997-08-20 2002-06-20 윤종용 Mpeg2 motion picture coding/decoding system
EP0934656B1 (en) 1997-08-26 2005-07-06 Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. System for transferring content information and supplemental information relating thereto
JPH1173725A (en) 1997-08-29 1999-03-16 Sony Corp Information signal recording/reproducing system, information recording device, information signal reproducing device and information signal recording/ reproducing method
JP4064506B2 (en) * 1997-09-17 2008-03-19 パイオニア株式会社 Digital watermark superimposing method, detecting method and apparatus
US6278807B1 (en) 1997-11-13 2001-08-21 Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba Data recording/reproducing apparatus, data recording/reproducing method applied to the apparatus, and computer program product used in data processing apparatus
US6804376B2 (en) 1998-01-20 2004-10-12 Digimarc Corporation Equipment employing watermark-based authentication function
US7372976B2 (en) 1998-04-16 2008-05-13 Digimarc Corporation Content indexing and searching using content identifiers and associated metadata
US7602940B2 (en) 1998-04-16 2009-10-13 Digimarc Corporation Steganographic data hiding using a device clock
US6285774B1 (en) 1998-06-08 2001-09-04 Digital Video Express, L.P. System and methodology for tracing to a source of unauthorized copying of prerecorded proprietary material, such as movies
US6978036B2 (en) 1998-07-31 2005-12-20 Digimarc Corporation Tamper-resistant authentication techniques for identification documents
US7346580B2 (en) 1998-08-13 2008-03-18 International Business Machines Corporation Method and system of preventing unauthorized rerecording of multimedia content
US6456393B1 (en) 1998-08-18 2002-09-24 Seiko Epson Corporation Information embedding in document copies
US7313253B2 (en) 1998-09-11 2007-12-25 Digimarc Corporation Methods and tangible objects employing machine readable data in photo-reactive materials
US6442284B1 (en) 1999-03-19 2002-08-27 Digimarc Corporation Watermark detection utilizing regions with higher probability of success
CN1385028A (en) 1999-08-27 2002-12-11 株式会社塞拉特姆技术 Image distributing method and system, image data, and recorded medium
JP3976969B2 (en) 1999-12-02 2007-09-19 キヤノン株式会社 Image processing apparatus, image processing method, and storage medium
US6915481B1 (en) 2000-01-11 2005-07-05 Cognicity, Inc. Transactional watermarking
US6801636B2 (en) 2000-01-31 2004-10-05 Canon Kabushiki Kaisha Image processing apparatus and method, and storage medium
JP3789069B2 (en) 2000-02-29 2006-06-21 キヤノン株式会社 Digital watermark embedding apparatus and method, program and storage medium, and digital watermark extraction apparatus and method, program and storage medium
EP1152592B1 (en) 2000-04-25 2009-06-24 Eastman Kodak Company A method for printing and verifying authentication documents
US7228427B2 (en) 2000-06-16 2007-06-05 Entriq Inc. Method and system to securely distribute content via a network
US6952485B1 (en) 2000-09-11 2005-10-04 Digimarc Corporation Watermark encoding and decoding in imaging devices and imaging device interfaces
JP3647372B2 (en) 2000-12-28 2005-05-11 キヤノン株式会社 Image processing apparatus and method
US7376242B2 (en) 2001-03-22 2008-05-20 Digimarc Corporation Quantization-based data embedding in mapped data
US6996248B2 (en) 2001-06-13 2006-02-07 Qualcomm, Incorporated Apparatus and method for watermarking a digital image
US6968072B1 (en) 2001-12-06 2005-11-22 Pixim, Inc. Image sensor with built-in steganographic and watermarking functions
US7567721B2 (en) 2002-01-22 2009-07-28 Digimarc Corporation Digital watermarking of low bit rate video
US8301893B2 (en) 2003-08-13 2012-10-30 Digimarc Corporation Detecting media areas likely of hosting watermarks
US20080240490A1 (en) 2007-03-30 2008-10-02 Microsoft Corporation Source authentication and usage tracking of video

Patent Citations (99)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4908873A (en) * 1983-05-13 1990-03-13 Philibert Alex C Document reproduction security system
US4930160A (en) * 1987-09-02 1990-05-29 Vogel Peter S Automatic censorship of video programs
US4807031A (en) * 1987-10-20 1989-02-21 Interactive Systems, Incorporated Interactive video method and apparatus
US5905810A (en) * 1990-02-05 1999-05-18 Cummins-Allison Corp. Automatic currency processing system
US5481377A (en) * 1991-03-29 1996-01-02 Canon Kabushiki Kaisha Image processing with anti-forgery function
US5515451A (en) * 1992-01-08 1996-05-07 Fuji Xerox Co., Ltd. Image processing system for selectively reproducing documents
US5751854A (en) * 1992-08-03 1998-05-12 Ricoh Company, Ltd. Original-discrimination system for discriminating special document, and image forming apparatus, image processing apparatus and duplicator using the original-discrimination system
US5483602A (en) * 1992-08-20 1996-01-09 Gao Gesellschaft Fur Automation Und Organisation Mbh Method and apparatus for detecting printed images on documents by testing for the presence in the images of structural elements having defined regularities which are recognizable by the eye and common to a variety of documents
US20020054356A1 (en) * 1992-09-28 2002-05-09 Mitsuru Kurita Image processing apparatus and method using image information and additional information or an additional pattern added thereto or superposed thereon
US5629990A (en) * 1992-10-08 1997-05-13 Fuji Xerox Co., Ltd. Image processing system
US5483658A (en) * 1993-02-26 1996-01-09 Grube; Gary W. Detection of unauthorized use of software applications in processing devices
US5602906A (en) * 1993-04-30 1997-02-11 Sprint Communications Company L.P. Toll fraud detection system
US5416307A (en) * 1993-09-03 1995-05-16 Danek; Robert Currency paper verification and denomination device
US5485213A (en) * 1993-09-17 1996-01-16 Fujitsu Limited Method and apparatus for encoding and decoding image data
US5610688A (en) * 1993-11-05 1997-03-11 Sharp Kabushiki Kaisha Image forming apparatus having illegal use prevention
US5748763A (en) * 1993-11-18 1998-05-05 Digimarc Corporation Image steganography system featuring perceptually adaptive and globally scalable signal embedding
US6987862B2 (en) * 1993-11-18 2006-01-17 Digimarc Corporation Video steganography
US5745604A (en) * 1993-11-18 1998-04-28 Digimarc Corporation Identification/authentication system using robust, distributed coding
US20100008537A1 (en) * 1993-11-18 2010-01-14 Rhoads Geoffrey B Embedding Hidden Auxiliary Information in Media
US20100021004A1 (en) * 1993-11-18 2010-01-28 Rhoads Geoffrey B Hiding and Detecting Messages in Media Signals
US7181022B2 (en) * 1993-11-18 2007-02-20 Digimarc Corporation Audio watermarking to convey auxiliary information, and media embodying same
US20060062386A1 (en) * 1993-11-18 2006-03-23 Rhoads Geoffrey B Steganographic encoding and decoding of auxiliary codes in media signals
US7003132B2 (en) * 1993-11-18 2006-02-21 Digimarc Corporation Embedding hidden auxiliary code signals in media
US7672477B2 (en) * 1993-11-18 2010-03-02 Digimarc Corporation Detecting hidden auxiliary code signals in media
US20030021440A1 (en) * 1993-11-18 2003-01-30 Rhoads Geoffrey B. Digital watermarking employing noise model
US6026193A (en) * 1993-11-18 2000-02-15 Digimarc Corporation Video steganography
US7499564B2 (en) * 1993-11-18 2009-03-03 Digimarc Corporation Methods for decoding watermark data from audio, and controlling audio devices in accordance therewith
US6983051B1 (en) * 1993-11-18 2006-01-03 Digimarc Corporation Methods for audio watermarking and decoding
US20040057581A1 (en) * 1993-11-18 2004-03-25 Rhoads Geoffrey B. Method and apparatus for transaction card security utilizing embedded image data
US6675146B2 (en) * 1993-11-18 2004-01-06 Digimarc Corporation Audio steganography
US6567535B2 (en) * 1993-11-18 2003-05-20 Digimarc Corporation Steganographic system with changing operations
US6343138B1 (en) * 1993-11-18 2002-01-29 Digimarc Corporation Security documents with hidden digital data
US6567780B2 (en) * 1993-11-18 2003-05-20 Digimarc Corporation Audio with hidden in-band digital data
US6542620B1 (en) * 1993-11-18 2003-04-01 Digimarc Corporation Signal processing to hide plural-bit information in image, video, and audio data
US6542618B1 (en) * 1993-11-18 2003-04-01 Digimarc Corporation Methods for watermark decoding
US6353672B1 (en) * 1993-11-18 2002-03-05 Digimarc Corporation Steganography using dynamic codes
US6363159B1 (en) * 1993-11-18 2002-03-26 Digimarc Corporation Consumer audio appliance responsive to watermark data
US6539095B1 (en) * 1993-11-18 2003-03-25 Geoffrey B. Rhoads Audio watermarking to convey auxiliary control information, and media embodying same
US5499294A (en) * 1993-11-24 1996-03-12 The United States Of America As Represented By The Administrator Of The National Aeronautics And Space Administration Digital camera with apparatus for authentication of images produced from an image file
US6993152B2 (en) * 1994-03-17 2006-01-31 Digimarc Corporation Hiding geo-location data through arrangement of objects
US6345104B1 (en) * 1994-03-17 2002-02-05 Digimarc Corporation Digital watermarks and methods for security documents
US6522771B2 (en) * 1994-03-17 2003-02-18 Digimarc Corporation Processing scanned security documents notwithstanding corruptions such as rotation
US6882738B2 (en) * 1994-03-17 2005-04-19 Digimarc Corporation Methods and tangible objects employing textured machine readable data
US5739864A (en) * 1994-08-24 1998-04-14 Macrovision Corporation Apparatus for inserting blanked formatted fingerprint data (source ID, time/date) in to a video signal
US20020059238A1 (en) * 1994-09-30 2002-05-16 Mitsubishi Corporation Data management system
US6519352B2 (en) * 1994-10-21 2003-02-11 Digimarc Corporation Encoding and decoding in accordance with steganographically-conveyed data
US7184570B2 (en) * 1994-10-21 2007-02-27 Digimarc Corporation Methods and systems for steganographic processing
US7359528B2 (en) * 1994-10-21 2008-04-15 Digimarc Corporation Monitoring of video or audio based on in-band and out-of-band data
US6560349B1 (en) * 1994-10-21 2003-05-06 Digimarc Corporation Audio monitoring using steganographic information
US20100008536A1 (en) * 1994-10-21 2010-01-14 Rhoads Geoffrey B Methods and Systems for Steganographic Processing
US6535618B1 (en) * 1994-10-21 2003-03-18 Digimarc Corporation Image capture device with steganographic data embedding
US7676059B2 (en) * 1994-10-21 2010-03-09 Digimarc Corporation Video steganography or encoding
US20020021825A1 (en) * 1994-10-21 2002-02-21 Rhoads Geoffrey B. Methods for identifying equipment used in counterfeiting
US6182218B1 (en) * 1994-12-13 2001-01-30 Mitsubishi Corporation Digital content management system using electronic watermark
US20070047766A1 (en) * 1995-05-08 2007-03-01 Rhoads Geoffrey B Methods for Steganographic Encoding Media
US6738495B2 (en) * 1995-05-08 2004-05-18 Digimarc Corporation Watermarking enhanced to withstand anticipated corruptions
US20100040255A1 (en) * 1995-05-08 2010-02-18 Rhoads Geoffrey B Processing Data Representing Video and Audio and Methods Related Thereto
US7499566B2 (en) * 1995-05-08 2009-03-03 Digimarc Corporation Methods for steganographic encoding media
US20020021824A1 (en) * 1995-05-08 2002-02-21 Reed Alastair M. Low visibility watermarks using an out-of-phase color
US6567534B1 (en) * 1995-05-08 2003-05-20 Digimarc Corporation Methods and systems for watermark processing of line art images
US20100008534A1 (en) * 1995-05-08 2010-01-14 Rhoads Geoffrey B Methods for Managing Content Using Intentional Degradation and Insertion of Steganographic Codes
US7054462B2 (en) * 1995-05-08 2006-05-30 Digimarc Corporation Inferring object status based on detected watermark data
US20100054529A1 (en) * 1995-05-08 2010-03-04 Rhoads Geoffrey B Methods for Extracting Identifying Information From Video and Audio Content
US7702511B2 (en) * 1995-05-08 2010-04-20 Digimarc Corporation Watermarking to convey auxiliary information, and media embodying same
US5727092A (en) * 1995-05-17 1998-03-10 The Regents Of The University Of California Compression embedding
US5710636A (en) * 1995-06-05 1998-01-20 Xerox Corporation Method and apparatus for generating halftone images having human readable patterns formed therein
US5613004A (en) * 1995-06-07 1997-03-18 The Dice Company Steganographic method and device
US20050111047A1 (en) * 1995-07-27 2005-05-26 Rhoads Geoffrey B. Printer driver separately applying watermark and information
US6389151B1 (en) * 1995-08-09 2002-05-14 Digimarc Corporation Printing and validation of self validating security documents
US5905800A (en) * 1996-01-17 1999-05-18 The Dice Company Method and system for digital watermarking
US5752152A (en) * 1996-02-08 1998-05-12 Eastman Kodak Company Copy restrictive system
US5892900A (en) * 1996-08-30 1999-04-06 Intertrust Technologies Corp. Systems and methods for secure transaction management and electronic rights protection
US5901224A (en) * 1996-10-21 1999-05-04 Xerox Corporation Quasi-reprographics with variable embedded data with applications to copyright management, and distribution control
US20060028689A1 (en) * 1996-11-12 2006-02-09 Perry Burt W Document management with embedded data
US6185321B1 (en) * 1997-01-21 2001-02-06 Sharp Kabushiki Kaisha Image forming system
US6185312B1 (en) * 1997-01-28 2001-02-06 Nippon Telegraph And Telephone Corporation Method for embedding and reading watermark-information in digital form, and apparatus thereof
US6233684B1 (en) * 1997-02-28 2001-05-15 Contenaguard Holdings, Inc. System for controlling the distribution and use of rendered digital works through watermaking
US6384935B1 (en) * 1997-02-28 2002-05-07 Canon Kabushiki Kaisha Image process apparatus, image process method and storage medium
US6216228B1 (en) * 1997-04-23 2001-04-10 International Business Machines Corporation Controlling video or image presentation according to encoded content classification information within the video or image data
US6389055B1 (en) * 1998-03-30 2002-05-14 Lucent Technologies, Inc. Integrating digital data with perceptible signals
US6724912B1 (en) * 1998-07-31 2004-04-20 Digimarc Corporation Digital watermarking of physical objects
US6549638B2 (en) * 1998-11-03 2003-04-15 Digimarc Corporation Methods for evidencing illicit use of a computer system or device
US20070016790A1 (en) * 1998-11-19 2007-01-18 Brundage Trent J Identification document and related methods
US6870573B2 (en) * 1999-01-22 2005-03-22 Intel Corporation Method and apparatus for dynamically generating a visual program summary from a multi-source video feed
US6556688B1 (en) * 1999-03-15 2003-04-29 Seiko Epson Corporation Watermarking with random zero-mean patches for printer tracking
US20020056118A1 (en) * 1999-08-27 2002-05-09 Hunter Charles Eric Video and music distribution system
US20020056081A1 (en) * 1999-12-02 2002-05-09 Qualcomm Incorporated Apparatus and method for decoding digital image and audio signals
US20020054692A1 (en) * 2000-01-31 2002-05-09 Takashi Suzuki Image processing system
US20020041686A1 (en) * 2000-05-10 2002-04-11 Pioneer Corporation Copyright protecting method, recording method, recording apparatus, reproduction method and reproduction apparatus
US20020054317A1 (en) * 2000-08-25 2002-05-09 Fuji Xerox Co., Ltd. Image data outputting apparatus and image data outputting method
US20020039314A1 (en) * 2000-10-03 2002-04-04 Pioneer Corporation Information recording apparatus, information recording method, and information recording medium in which information recording program is computer-readably recorded
US7340076B2 (en) * 2001-05-10 2008-03-04 Digimarc Corporation Digital watermarks for unmanned vehicle navigation
US20030084284A1 (en) * 2001-10-24 2003-05-01 Satoshi Ando Data distribution system, sending device, receiving device, data distribution method, sending method, receiving method, recording medium on which data preparation program is recorded and recording medium on which data assembling program is recorded
US7321667B2 (en) * 2002-01-18 2008-01-22 Digimarc Corporation Data hiding through arrangement of objects
US7020304B2 (en) * 2002-01-22 2006-03-28 Digimarc Corporation Digital watermarking and fingerprinting including synchronization, layering, version control, and compressed embedding
US20100027969A1 (en) * 2002-06-10 2010-02-04 Alattar Adnan M Identification and protection of video
US20050025463A1 (en) * 2003-06-20 2005-02-03 Bloom Jeffrey Adam Method and apparatus for creating multiple unique copies of content
US20060075244A1 (en) * 2004-07-30 2006-04-06 Robert Schumann Tracing content usage
US20060031684A1 (en) * 2004-08-06 2006-02-09 Sharma Ravi K Fast signal detection and distributed computing in portable computing devices

Cited By (54)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US8204222B2 (en) 1993-11-18 2012-06-19 Digimarc Corporation Steganographic encoding and decoding of auxiliary codes in media signals
US8391541B2 (en) 1993-11-18 2013-03-05 Digimarc Corporation Steganographic encoding and detecting for video signals
US7916354B2 (en) 1993-11-18 2011-03-29 Digimarc Corporation Hiding and detecting auxiliary data in media materials and signals
US7974439B2 (en) 1993-11-18 2011-07-05 Digimarc Corporation Embedding hidden auxiliary information in media
US8505108B2 (en) 1993-11-18 2013-08-06 Digimarc Corporation Authentication using a digital watermark
US7987094B2 (en) 1993-11-18 2011-07-26 Digimarc Corporation Audio encoding to convey auxiliary information, and decoding of same
US8051294B2 (en) 1993-11-18 2011-11-01 Digimarc Corporation Methods for audio watermarking and decoding
US8355514B2 (en) 1993-11-18 2013-01-15 Digimarc Corporation Audio encoding to convey auxiliary information, and media embodying same
US8014563B2 (en) 1994-10-21 2011-09-06 Digimarc Corporation Methods and systems for steganographic processing
US8073193B2 (en) 1994-10-21 2011-12-06 Digimarc Corporation Methods and systems for steganographic processing
US8023692B2 (en) 1994-10-21 2011-09-20 Digimarc Corporation Apparatus and methods to process video or audio
US20080253740A1 (en) * 1994-10-21 2008-10-16 Rhoads Geoffrey B Apparatus and Methods to Process Video or Audio
US8068679B2 (en) 1995-05-08 2011-11-29 Digimarc Corporation Audio and video signal processing
US8078697B2 (en) 1995-05-08 2011-12-13 Digimarc Corporation Network linking methods and apparatus
US7991184B2 (en) 1995-05-08 2011-08-02 Digimarc Corporation Apparatus to process images and video
US8116516B2 (en) 1995-05-08 2012-02-14 Digimarc Corporation Controlling use of audio or image content
US8144924B2 (en) 1995-05-08 2012-03-27 Digimarc Corporation Content objects with computer instructions steganographically encoded therein, and associated methods
US8411898B2 (en) 1995-05-08 2013-04-02 Digimarc Corporation Digital authentication with analog documents
US7936900B2 (en) 1995-05-08 2011-05-03 Digimarc Corporation Processing data representing video and audio and methods related thereto
US9630443B2 (en) 1995-07-27 2017-04-25 Digimarc Corporation Printer driver separately applying watermark and information
US8280101B2 (en) 1995-08-09 2012-10-02 Digimarc Corporation Identification documents and authentication of such documents
US8769297B2 (en) 1996-04-25 2014-07-01 Digimarc Corporation Method for increasing the functionality of a media player/recorder device or an application program
US8483426B2 (en) 1996-05-07 2013-07-09 Digimarc Corporation Digital watermarks
US8144368B2 (en) 1998-01-20 2012-03-27 Digimarc Coporation Automated methods for distinguishing copies from original printed objects
US8036419B2 (en) 1998-04-16 2011-10-11 Digimarc Corporation Digital watermarks
US8391545B2 (en) 1998-04-16 2013-03-05 Digimarc Corporation Signal processing of audio and video data, including assessment of embedded data
US20100119108A1 (en) * 1998-04-16 2010-05-13 Rhoads Geoffrey B Methods and Arrangements for Composing Information-Carrying Artwork
US8059860B2 (en) 1998-04-16 2011-11-15 Brundage Trent J Steganographic encoding
US8165341B2 (en) 1998-04-16 2012-04-24 Digimarc Corporation Methods and apparatus to process imagery or audio content
US8788971B2 (en) 1998-04-16 2014-07-22 Digimarc Corporation Methods and arrangements for composing information-carrying artwork
US8644548B2 (en) 1998-04-16 2014-02-04 Digimarc Corporation Digital watermarks
US8014562B2 (en) 1998-04-16 2011-09-06 Digimarc Corporation Signal processing of audio and video data, including deriving identifying information
US8041074B2 (en) 1998-04-16 2011-10-18 Digimarc Corporation Content indexing and searching using content identifiers and associated metadata
US8059858B2 (en) 1998-11-19 2011-11-15 Digimarc Corporation Identification document and related methods
US8447067B2 (en) 1999-05-19 2013-05-21 Digimarc Corporation Location-based arrangements employing mobile devices
US8051169B2 (en) 2000-03-18 2011-11-01 Digimarc Corporation Methods and systems useful in linking from objects to remote resources
US8312168B2 (en) 2000-03-18 2012-11-13 Digimarc Corporation Methods for linking from objects to remote resources
US8045748B2 (en) 2000-03-18 2011-10-25 Digimarc Corporation Watermark embedding functions adapted for transmission channels
US8175329B2 (en) 2000-04-17 2012-05-08 Digimarc Corporation Authentication of physical and electronic media objects using digital watermarks
US8126272B2 (en) 2000-05-02 2012-02-28 Digimarc Corporation Methods combining multiple frames of image data
US8131760B2 (en) 2000-07-20 2012-03-06 Digimarc Corporation Using object identifiers with content distribution
US9843846B2 (en) 2000-12-21 2017-12-12 Digimarc Corporation Watermark and fingerprint systems for media
US8825518B2 (en) 2000-12-21 2014-09-02 Digimarc Corporation Media methods and systems
US8006092B2 (en) 2001-01-24 2011-08-23 Digimarc Corporation Digital watermarks for checking authenticity of printed objects
US8051295B2 (en) 2001-04-20 2011-11-01 Digimarc Corporation Benchmarks for digital watermarking
US8515121B2 (en) 2002-01-18 2013-08-20 Digimarc Corporation Arrangement of objects in images or graphics to convey a machine-readable signal
US7974495B2 (en) 2002-06-10 2011-07-05 Digimarc Corporation Identification and protection of video
US8301893B2 (en) 2003-08-13 2012-10-30 Digimarc Corporation Detecting media areas likely of hosting watermarks
US7865957B1 (en) * 2007-02-26 2011-01-04 Trend Micro Inc. Apparatus and methods for updating mobile device virus pattern data
US20140373167A1 (en) * 2012-08-09 2014-12-18 Nippon Telegraph And Telephone Corporation Trace center apparatus and method for enabling contents to be traced
CN104010193A (en) * 2014-05-29 2014-08-27 中国科学院信息工程研究所 Video steganographic method based on macro block partition mode disturbance
US20210271756A1 (en) * 2019-01-08 2021-09-02 Intsights Cyber Intelligence Ltd. System and method for detecting leaked documents on a computer network
US11693960B2 (en) * 2019-01-08 2023-07-04 Intsights Cyber Intelligence Ltd. System and method for detecting leaked documents on a computer network
CN109963159A (en) * 2019-01-16 2019-07-02 中山大学 A kind of information steganography algorithm of the dual disturbance scoring of bianry image based on STC coding

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
US8290202B2 (en) 2012-10-16

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US8290202B2 (en) Methods utilizing steganography
US6549638B2 (en) Methods for evidencing illicit use of a computer system or device
JP4553484B2 (en) Digital authentication using analog documents
Johnson et al. Information hiding: steganography and watermarking-attacks and countermeasures: steganography and watermarking: attacks and countermeasures
US20030233169A1 (en) System and method for expressing usage rights using light signals
WO2000051338A1 (en) Data monitoring method, data monitoring device, copying device, and storage medium
JP2004533677A (en) System and method for monitoring unauthorized transport of digital content
Li et al. Protecting the intellectual property of deep neural networks with watermarking: The frequency domain approach
JP2000253241A (en) Data monitoring method and device therefor
KR100430469B1 (en) System for preventing document from forging/alternating
Jain et al. Fragile watermarking for image authentication: survey
Frith Steganography approaches, options, and implications
Kuraki et al. Watermarking technologies for security-enhanced printed documents
Patel et al. Digital image watermarking mechanism for image authentication, image forgery and self recovery
CA2355715A1 (en) Counterfeit deterrence system
Grover Data watermarking: Steganography and watermarking of digital data
Darwish New system to fingerprint extensible markup language documents using winnowing theory
Usop et al. A Review of Digital Watermarking Techniques, Characteristics and Attacks in Text Documents
JP2005130039A (en) Data processor
ŞİMŞEK et al. Screen Watermark: A Novel Approach in Detecting Digital Criminals
Joseph et al. Digital Watermarks for Copyright Protection
BASHA et al. A Study on Watermarking Techniques
JPH1188671A (en) Valid use authentication system for image output device
JP2000253240A (en) Duplicating device
Abiew et al. LSB-based Audio Steganographical Framework for Securing Data in Transit

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AS Assignment

Owner name: DIGIMARC CORPORATION, OREGON

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:CARR, J. SCOTT;DAVIS, BRUCE L.;RHOADS, GEOFFREY B.;SIGNING DATES FROM 20070314 TO 20070320;REEL/FRAME:019152/0359

Owner name: DIGIMARC CORPORATION, OREGON

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:CARR, J. SCOTT;DAVIS, BRUCE L.;RHOADS, GEOFFREY B.;REEL/FRAME:019152/0359;SIGNING DATES FROM 20070314 TO 20070320

AS Assignment

Owner name: DIGIMARC CORPORATION (FORMERLY DMRC CORPORATION),

Free format text: CONFIRMATION OF TRANSFER OF UNITED STATES PATENT RIGHTS;ASSIGNOR:L-1 SECURE CREDENTIALING, INC. (FORMERLY KNOWN AS DIGIMARC CORPORATION);REEL/FRAME:021785/0796

Effective date: 20081024

Owner name: DIGIMARC CORPORATION (FORMERLY DMRC CORPORATION), OREGON

Free format text: CONFIRMATION OF TRANSFER OF UNITED STATES PATENT RIGHTS;ASSIGNOR:L-1 SECURE CREDENTIALING, INC. (FORMERLY KNOWN AS DIGIMARC CORPORATION);REEL/FRAME:021785/0796

Effective date: 20081024

Owner name: DIGIMARC CORPORATION (FORMERLY DMRC CORPORATION),O

Free format text: CONFIRMATION OF TRANSFER OF UNITED STATES PATENT RIGHTS;ASSIGNOR:L-1 SECURE CREDENTIALING, INC. (FORMERLY KNOWN AS DIGIMARC CORPORATION);REEL/FRAME:021785/0796

Effective date: 20081024

AS Assignment

Owner name: DIGIMARC CORPORATION (AN OREGON CORPORATION), OREGON

Free format text: MERGER;ASSIGNOR:DIGIMARC CORPORATION (A DELAWARE CORPORATION);REEL/FRAME:024369/0582

Effective date: 20100430

Owner name: DIGIMARC CORPORATION (AN OREGON CORPORATION),OREGO

Free format text: MERGER;ASSIGNOR:DIGIMARC CORPORATION (A DELAWARE CORPORATION);REEL/FRAME:024369/0582

Effective date: 20100430

Owner name: DIGIMARC CORPORATION (AN OREGON CORPORATION), OREG

Free format text: MERGER;ASSIGNOR:DIGIMARC CORPORATION (A DELAWARE CORPORATION);REEL/FRAME:024369/0582

Effective date: 20100430

AS Assignment

Owner name: DMRC LLC, OREGON

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:DIGIMARC CORPORATION (A DELAWARE CORPORATION);REEL/FRAME:025217/0508

Effective date: 20080801

AS Assignment

Owner name: DMRC CORPORATION, OREGON

Free format text: MERGER;ASSIGNOR:DMRC LLC;REEL/FRAME:025227/0808

Effective date: 20080801

Owner name: DIGIMARC CORPORATION, OREGON

Free format text: MERGER;ASSIGNOR:DMRC CORPORATION;REEL/FRAME:025227/0832

Effective date: 20080903

STCF Information on status: patent grant

Free format text: PATENTED CASE

CC Certificate of correction
FPAY Fee payment

Year of fee payment: 4

MAFP Maintenance fee payment

Free format text: PAYMENT OF MAINTENANCE FEE, 8TH YEAR, LARGE ENTITY (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: M1552); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITY

Year of fee payment: 8