US20070214759A1

US20070214759A1 - Narrow pore size distribution aluminum titanate body and method for making same

Info

Publication number: US20070214759A1
Application number: US11/651,716
Authority: US
Inventors: Gregory Merkel
Original assignee: Individual
Current assignee: Individual
Priority date: 2004-07-29
Filing date: 2007-01-10
Publication date: 2007-09-20
Also published as: JP4961344B2; WO2006015240A2; EP1778383A2; US20060021309A1; CN101124029A; CN101124029B; JP2008508185A; EP1778383B1; US20060021308A1; EP1778383A4; WO2006015240A3; US7294164B2

Abstract

This invention relates to an aluminum titanate body having a narrow pore size distribution as characterized by the relation (d₅₀−d₁₀)/d₅₀being less than 0.50 corresponding to a high degree of interconnected porosity. The body also preferably exhibits a low coefficient of thermal expansion of less than 15×10⁻⁷C⁻¹, high porosity of at least 38% by volume, and at least 0.10% by weight metal oxide, the metal being either yttrium, calcium, bismuth, a lanthanide metal or combinations of thereof. MOR is preferably at least 450 psi. Median pore diameter is preferably at least 8 microns. The inventive ceramic body is particularly useful as a wall-flow filter for a diesel exhaust. A method of fabrication is provided where the sintering temperature is preferably between 1375°-1550° C.

Description

RELATED APPLICATIONS

The present invention is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/193,123 to G. Merkel filed Jul. 28, 2005 entitled “Narrow Pore Size Distribution Aluminum Titanate Body and Method for Making Same,” which is a continuation-in-part application of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/902,381 to G. Merkel filed Jul. 29, 2004 and entitled “Mullite-Aluminum Titanate Body And Method For Making Same,” now abandoned.

FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The present invention relates to an aluminum titanate ceramic body that has improved properties for use in high temperature applications and a method for making the same.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

Porous refractory ceramics have long been used as particulate filters in hot gas or corrosive environments such as advanced coal-based gas turbine cycles, municipal and industrial waste incinerators, and diesel or natural-gas engine exhaust systems. For such applications, ceramic particulate filters must possess chemical inertness, thermal shock resistance, high filtration efficiency, low pressure drop, and adequate strength. In particular, a diesel particulate filter (DPF) ideally combines low CTE (for thermal shock resistance), low pressure drop (for engine efficiency), high filtration efficiency (for removal of most particles from the exhaust stream), high strength (to survive handling, canning, and vibration in use), and low cost.
Candidate materials for DPFs include cordierite, silicon carbide and aluminum titanate based ceramics. Cordierite is attractive due to its low cost, low CTE, and good strength. However, the relatively low volumetric heat capacity (approximately 2.8 J cm⁻³° C.⁻¹at 800 K) and low thermal conductivity of cordierite can result in unacceptably high temperatures during operation when the filters are regenerated under certain conditions. Further, obtaining a well-interconnected pore microstructure in cordierite filters, in combination with low porosity required for high thermal mass, has been a challenge.
Silicon carbide filters have an advantage of a well-interconnected porosity for low pressure drop. Higher volumetric heat capacity (approximately 3.6 J cm⁻³° C.⁻¹at 800 K) and high thermal conductivity, coupled with a very high melting point, make silicon carbide thermally durable. However, silicon carbide is relatively expensive. Furthermore, the high coefficient of thermal expansion requires silicon carbide filters to be fabricated as cement-bonded segments, adding to manufacturing cost and raising concerns about their long-term thermo-mechanical durability.
Aluminum titanate (AT) based ceramics and specifically mullite-aluminum titanate (MAT) ceramics offer a very high volumetric heat capacity (approximately 3.9 to 4.0 J cm⁻³° C.⁻¹for fully dense MAT at 800 K) in combination with a low CTE. Further, AT and MAT ceramics have excellent chemical durability and high melting point.
However, in the manufacture of AT and MAT bodies, high sintering temperatures greater than 1600° C. are often required to achieve sufficient grain growth for microcracking and low thermal expansion. Such high heating temperatures add cost to manufacturing and final product. To reduce the sintering temperature some approaches have utilized the addition of chemical components. Nonetheless, such methods often result in a strong sensitivity of the physical properties, including CTE, porosity, or pore size, to the firing temperature, which is undesirable for manufacturability. Also, desired properties for DPF use are not expected to be achieved.
A need therefore exists to have an AT body that can be manufactured at lower sintering temperatures with properties that are useful for high temperature filtration applications. Further, there is a need for an AT body which has a narrow pore size distribution without sacrificing CTE, porosity, and strength.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

AT ceramic bodies of the present invention offer narrow pore size distribution providing greater interconnectivity of the porosity. In particular, the ceramic body comprises 1. A ceramic body, comprises a phase of aluminum titanate and a narrow pore size distribution as characterized by the relation (d₅₀−d₁₀)/d₅₀being less than 0.50, a coefficient of thermal expansion (RT−1000° C.) less than 15×10⁻⁷C⁻¹, a porosity of at least 38% by volume, and at least 0.10% by weight of a metal oxide for a metal selected from the group consisting of bismuth, calcium, yttrium, lanthanides and combinations thereof. Most preferably, the relation (d₅₀−d₁₀)/d₅₀is more preferably less than 0.35; and in some embodiments, less than 0.25, or even 0.23 or less. Most preferably, the relation (d₅₀−d₁₀)/d₅₀is less than 0.50 and greater than 0.18.
Further, the present invention AT ceramic body preferably also exhibits low thermal expansion and good thermal shock characteristics by exhibiting a coefficient of thermal expansion (RT−1000° C.) less than 15×10⁻⁷C⁻¹, and more preferably less than 10×10⁻⁷C⁻¹. Additionally, the AT ceramic body preferably also exhibits high porosity, of at least 38% by volume, and more preferably between 45-60% by volume. The preset invention AT body also achieves excellent strength, exhibiting a modulus of rupture (MOR) using the four point method on a cylindrical rod, of at least 450 psi; more preferably at least 500 psi; and in some embodiments, at least 600 psi or even at least 700 psi. Preferably also, the AT ceramic body may exhibit a median pore diameter of greater than 8 micrometers; more preferably between 10-20 micrometers.
The AT ceramic body is preferably fabricated at lower sintering temperatures, preferably between 1375° C.-1550° C., by using a metal oxide sintering additive in the raw material batch. The metal oxide is added in an amount preferably of at least 0.10% by weight, in some applications between 0.10%-5.0% by weight. The oxide relating to a metal is preferably selected from the group consisting of yttrium, bismuth, calcium, lanthanide metals, and combinations thereof.
In one embodiment, the inventive AT ceramic body exhibits a coefficient of thermal expansion (RT−1000° C.) less than 15×10⁻⁷C⁻¹, a porosity of at least 38% by volume, a median pore diameter of at least 8 micrometers, and a narrow pore size distribution as characterized by the relation (d₅₀−d₁₀)/d₅₀being not more than 0.50 which corresponds to a high degree of interconnected porosity.
The inventive bodies are especially useful in high temperature applications including wall-flow filters for diesel exhaust filtration. In one such embodiment the filter is a plugged, wall-flow honeycomb body having a plurality of parallel end-plugged cell channels traversing the body from a frontal inlet end to an outlet end thereof. The diesel exhaust particulate filter is preferably composed of the inventive AT ceramic and exhibits a coefficient of thermal expansion or CTE (RT−1000° C.) of not greater than 10×10⁻⁷C⁻¹, a porosity of between 45-60% by volume, a median pore diameter of between 10-20 micrometers, and a narrow pore size distribution as characterized by the relation (d₅₀−d₁₀)/d₅₀being less than 0.35 corresponding to a high degree of interconnected porosity. Some exemplary embodiments have pore size distributions characterized by the relation (d₅₀−d₁₀)/d₅₀) being less than 0.3; or less than 0.25; or in some embodiments even 0.23 or less.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 is a scanning electron micrograph of the as-fired surface of Inventive Example 16, showing the unique domain-type microstructure of radiating crystals;
FIG. 2 is a scanning electron micrograph of the as-fired surface of Comparative Example C5, showing the absence of any groups of radiating crystals;
FIG. 3 shows the changes in % porosity, median pore diameter, and mean CTE (RT−1000° C.) as a function of the amount of Y₂O₃added to the raw material mixture when fired at 1400° C.;
FIG. 4 shows the changes in % porosity, median pore diameter, and mean CTE (RT−1000° C.) as a function of the amount of Y₂O₃added to the raw material mixture when fired at 1500° C.;
FIG. 5 is a scanning electron micrograph of a polished cross section of Inventive Example 60 showing the high degree of interconnected porosity of the inventive material;
FIG. 6 shows the relationship between the pressure drop versus soot loading behavior of a commercially-available cordierite DPF, a silicon carbide DPF, and a DPF comprising the ceramic of Inventive Example 72, each having approximately the same heat capacity per unit volume; and
FIG. 7 shows the values for % porosity, median pore diameter (microns) and CTE (RT−1000° C., 10 ⁻⁷° C.⁻¹) for Examples 89 to 93 plotted versus the temperature at which the examples were fired.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS

The ceramic body of the present invention is composed primarily an aluminum titanate phase, and also may preferably include a phase of mullite. Further, the body may also including at least 0.10% by weight of one or more metal oxides in which the metal is selected from the group consisting of bismuth, calcium, yttrium, lanthanides and combinations thereof. For certain applications the metal oxide is preferably limited to an amount of between 0.10% to 5.0% by weight.
It has been observed that the addition of one or more of the recited metal oxides lowers the coefficient of thermal expansion and also increases the median pore diameter without substantially reducing the amount of porosity in the fired body. A low CTE is desired for high thermal shock resistance, while a large median pore diameter contributes to low pressure drop, when used as an exhaust filter.
Furthermore, the metal oxide sintering additives enable the use of lower sintering temperatures. Also, the physical properties of the inventive bodies are not sensitive to the firing temperature employed such that conventional kilns without the need for sophisticated and expensive temperature controls can be used. Further, as a result of the metal oxide sintering additives used the physical properties are not sensitive such that the inventive AT bodies can be used at temperatures higher than the sintering temperatures used, for a period of duration of 5-10 hours or somewhat more.
In fabricating the inventive ceramic bodies, a raw material mixture is first provided. The inorganic powders are selected from sources of: (a) alumina such as corundum, gamma-alumina or another transitional alumina, boehmite, aluminum hydroxide (gibbsite) and mixtures thereof, (b) aluminosilicate such as mullite, kyanite, sillimanite, kaolin, calcined kaolin, pyrophyllite and mixtures thereof, (c) silica such as quartz, cristobalite, zeolite, diatomaceous earth, a silicon organometallic compound, fused silica, colloidal silica, other amorphous silica, and combinations thereof, and (d) titanium dioxide such as rutile, anatase, amorphous titania, and mixtures thereof. Optionally, pre-reacted aluminum titanate may be used as a raw material, but is not required nor desired.
It is important, and therefore preferable, that in the raw material mixture of powders the weighted average of the median particle or agglomerate diameters of the constituent inorganic powders, denoted D₅₀, is at least 6 microns. The value of D₅₀is calculated as D₅₀=Σ[(w_i)(d_50,i)]/Σ(w_i) in which w_idenotes the weight percentage of each inorganic powder exclusive of the metal oxide sintering additive, and d_50,iis the median particle or agglomerate diameter of that same inorganic powder. The particle or agglomerate diameters are measured by a laser diffraction technique. A weighted average particle size of less than 6 microns would result in a pore size finer than 8 microns in the final AT ceramic, contrary to the desired properties of the present invention.
The alumina source preferably has a median particle size greater than 15 microns. When the particle size of the titania source is greater than 5 microns the porosity of the body is desirably increased without the need for large amounts of a pore-forming agent. Preferably, both the alumina source and titanium dioxide source have median particle or agglomerate diameters of at least 10 microns.
The raw material mixture further preferably includes a metal oxide sintering additive. Suitable metal oxides for purposes of the present invention include but are not limited to bismuth oxide, calcium carbonate, calcium hydroxide, calcium aluminate, calcium titanate, calcium silicate, yttrium or rare earth oxide, hydroxide, carbonate, fluoride-carbonate, aluminate, silicate, titanate, chloride, nitrate, acetate, or other soluble or insoluble salt, or a mixed rare earth concentrate such as bastnasite, calcined bastnasite, or monazite. The metal oxide sintering additive preferably has a median particle size of less than 5 microns, or is in a water-soluble state. The metal oxide additive is present in an amount of preferably at least 0.10% by weight, or preferably between 0.10% to 5.0% by weight super-addition to the other inorganic raw materials that react to form at least the aluminum titanate phase. By super-addition is meant that to 100 grams of inorganic raw material mixture are added for example between 0.10 to 5 grams of metal oxide.
Optionally, at least 0.05% by weight molybdenum oxide or tungsten oxide may be added to the raw material mixture. The addition of a molybdenum oxide or tungsten oxide source to the raw material mixture increases the amount of porosity in the fired ceramic, thus requiring less pore forming agent in the raw material mixture.
Optionally, a pore former may be added to tailor the porosity of the final ceramic body. The raw material mixture may include up to 20× grams per 100 grams of the inorganic raw materials, where X is the density of the pore former particle in grams per cubic centimeter. The pore forming agent may be any particulate material that undergoes combustion or vaporization during heating of the green body so as to leave behind pores after the sample has been fired.
Examples of pore forming agents include, but are not restricted to, graphite, amorphous carbon, cellulose, wood flour, nut shell flour, starches, and synthetic polymers such as polyethylene, polystyrene, and polyacrylate. The pore forming agent preferably has a median particle or agglomerate diameter of between 10-100 microns. Finer particle sizes result in an undesirably finer pore size and higher pressure drop when the body is used as a filtration device. Coarser particle sizes yield large pores than weaken the body and may result in reduced filtration efficiency if the body is used as a filter.
The raw materials and pore formers are further mixed with organic and/or organometallic binders, lubricants, and plasticizers and aqueous or non-aqueous solvents to form a plastic mixture that can be shaped by any conventional means, such as by molding or extrusion through a die, such as, for example, to form a honeycomb structure. The green-formed body is then preferably dried and fired in air to a preferable peak temperature-range of between about 13750 to 1550° C. and held for approximately 1 to 15 hours before cooling to room temperature.
AT ceramics according to the present invention preferably exhibit a low coefficient of thermal expansion (CTE) from a microcracked structure, good thermal durability, good strength, and highly interconnected porosity. The amount of mullite in the AT body is estimated to be preferably between 2-60% by weight, and in some embodiments between 15-40% by weight.
In one embodiment the inventive ceramic body is characterized by the following properties: a coefficient of thermal expansion (RT−1000° C.) less than 15×10⁻⁷C⁻¹, a porosity of at least 38% by volume, a median pore diameter of at least 8 micrometers, and a narrow pore size distribution as characterized by the relation (d₅₀−d₁₀)/d₅₀being not more than 0.50 which corresponds to a high degree of interconnected porosity. The values d₁₀and d₅₀are defined as the pore diameters at 10% and 50% of the cumulative pore size distribution based upon volume, as measured by mercury porosimetry, with d₁₀<d₅₀. Thus, d₅₀is the median pore diameter, and d₁₀is the pore diameter at which 10% of the pores are finer, based upon volume.
A narrow pore size distribution corresponds to a greater interconnectivity of the porosity in the AT body, which results in a lower pressure drop under soot-loaded conditions when the body is used as a diesel particulate filter. The material strength of the AT ceramic, as indicated by the modulus of rupture (MOR) using the four point method on a cylindrical rod, is at least 500 psi.
In another embodiment the inventive AT ceramic is used in the fabrication of filters for diesel exhaust, and, in particular, as a wall-flow filter. A wall-flow filter comprises a plugged, honeycomb body having a plurality of parallel end-plugged cell channels traversing the body from a frontal inlet end to an outlet end thereof. Such structures are well known in the art. Part of the total number of cells at the inlet end are plugged along a portion of their lengths, and the remaining part of cells that are open at the inlet end are plugged at the outlet end along a portion of their lengths. This plugging configuration allows for engine exhaust passing through the cells of the honeycomb from the inlet end to the outlet end to flow into the open cells, through the cell walls, and out of the structure through the open cells at the outlet end. Suitable cellular densities for diesel particulate filters range from 70 cells/in²(10.9 cells/cm²) to 400 cells/in²(62 cells/cm²).
In another embodiment a DPF comprising the inventive material is preferably characterized by the following properties: a coefficient of thermal expansion (RT−1000° C.) not greater than 10×10⁻⁷C⁻¹, a porosity of between 45-60% by volume, a median pore diameter of between 10-20 micrometers, and a narrow pore size distribution as characterized by the relation (d₅₀−d₁₀)/d₅₀being not greater than 0.35 which corresponds to a high degree of interconnected porosity.

EXAMPLES

The invention is further illustrated with the following non-limiting examples. Inventive and comparative samples are prepared by admixing the inorganic raw materials, metal oxide additives, and pore-forming agents with 4 to 6 wt % methyl cellulose binder, 0.15 wt % triethanol amine, 1% tall oil, and 14 to 18 wt % water. The mixture is plasticized in a stainless steel muller and extruded as 5/16-inch diameter rod and 1-inch, 2-inch, or 5.7-inch diameter honeycomb. Parts are dried and then fired in a gas or electric kiln at 14000 to 1500° C. and held for 4 to 10 hours.
After firing, the porosities of the samples are characterized by mercury porosimetry, the CTEs measured by dilatometry, and the modulus of rupture (MOR) by the four-point method on 5/16-in diameter rods. MOR values are reported in pounds per square inch (psi). Some samples are also crushed and their crystalline phases identified by powder x-ray diffractometry. Pore diameters (d₁₀, d₅₀and d₉₀) are in micrometers. The meanings of d₁₀and d₅₀has been defined previously. The value of d₉₀is the pore diameter for which 90% of the pores, by volume, are finer in diameter thus d₁₀<d₅₀<d₉₀. Coefficients of thermal expansion are in units of 10⁻⁷° C.⁻¹.
Selected 2-inch and 5.7-inch diameter parts, 6-inches long, are prepared as filters by plugging the ends of alternate channels on one face, and then plugging the ends of the adjacent channels on the opposite face, using a cold-set cement. Pressure drops across the length of the filters are measured at ambient temperature at air flow rates of 26.25 standard cubic feet per minute (scfm) on 2-inch diameter filters, and 210 scfm on the 5.7-inch diameter filters. The filters are then progressively loaded with artificial high surface area carbon soot at loadings from about 0.5 grams/liter to about 4.5 grams/liter, and the pressure drops measured at the same flow rate for each soot loading. Pressure drop values reported at 5 g/l soot loading are calculated by linear extrapolation of the data at lower soot loadings.
Median particle sizes of the raw materials used in the present inventive and comparative examples are listed in Table 1. Raw materials and properties of the examples are provided in Tables 2 to 23. Nominal percentages of aluminum titanate (Al₂TiO₅) and mullite (3Al₂O₃-2SiO₂) for each composition are by weight. All raw materials are also in parts by weight.
Examples prefixed by the letter “C” denote comparative (non-inventive) examples. Amounts of phases measured by powder XRD are denoted as major (M), minor (m), very minor (vm), trace (tr), small or very small trace (s.tr. and v.s.tr), or absent (0). Examples in Tables 2 to 19, and 23, were fired in electric furnaces; those in Tables 20-22 utilized either gas or electric furnaces, as indicated in the tables. In Tables 2-23, “MPS” denotes median particle size (diameter) in micrometers. MPS of the inorganic raw materials is equivalent to D₅₀and is also in micrometers. In the examples of Tables 2 to 23, the MPS of all inorganic raw materials includes contributions from alumina, aluminum hydroxide, titania, kaolin, and quartz.
Examples C1 and C2 in Table 2 show that, in the absence of a metal oxide addition selected from the inventive group of compounds, ceramic bodies of aluminum titanate+mullite fired at 1400 or 1500° C. have a CTE greater than 15. Comparative examples C3 and C4 show that, although the addition of 2.78% Y₂O₃reduces the CTE to less than 15, the median pore size is undesirably less than 8 microns when the weighted average of the median particle sizes of the inorganic raw materials is less than 6 microns.
Table 3 shows that, even when the weighted average of the median particle sizes of the inorganic raw materials is greater than 6 microns, the CTEs of the aluminum titanate+mullite ceramics are greater than 15 and the median pore sizes are less than 8 microns in the absence of a metal oxide addition selected from the inventive group of compounds, regardless of whether the compositions are fired at 1400° C. or at 1500° C. Furthermore, in the absence of the inventive sintering additive, substantial amounts of unreacted alumina and titania are present when fired at 1400° C. for these coarse raw materials.
By contrast, the inventive examples in Table 4 demonstrate that, when the weighted average of the median particle sizes of the inorganic raw materials is greater than 6 microns and the raw materials mixture contains Y₂O₃, the CTEs of the aluminum titanate ceramics are less than 7 and the median pore sizes are greater than 8 microns when at least 1.0 wt % Y₂O₃is added to this raw material mixture.
Examples 2 and 3 further show that the % porosity of the ceramic bodies is desirably increased by the addition of at least 1.0 wt % MoO₃to the raw materials. FIG. 1 illustrates that the microstructure of Inventive Example 16 consists of “domains” of radiating aluminum titanate crystals. Such domains provide a unique microstructure that may influence the nature of the microcracking in the inventive ceramics. This microstructure is contrasted with that of Comparative Example C5 in FIG. 2, which depicts the lack of domains when an inventive metal oxide additive is absent.
The examples in Table 5 illustrate that firing the inventive compositions at 1500° C. still yields very low CTE and a median pore size greater than 8 microns while still preserving desirable high porosities. Thus, the inventive sintering additives do not result in excessive densification of the ceramic bodies with increasing temperature, and are therefore conducive to manufacturing processes that do not require stringent and expensive control of the firing temperature to within a very narrow range.
Tables 6 and 7 provide additional inventive examples based upon Y₂O₃with or without MoO₃for 80% aluminum titanate/20% mullite and 70% aluminum titanate/30% mullite compositions using various raw material combinations, some including kaolin as a source of silica and alumina, sintered at only 1400° C. Tables 8 and 9 show that inventive properties are still retained when these compositions are fired at 1500° C.
Tables 10 and 11 characterize the dependence of the physical properties of the MAT ceramics on the amount of Y₂O₃addition to the raw material mixture, and the results are shown in FIGS. 3 and 4. Table 10 illustrates that when an 80% aluminum titanate/20% mullite composition in which the weighted average of the median particle sizes of the inorganic raw materials is 9.3 microns is fired at 1400° C., more than 0.5% Y₂O₃is required to maintain a median pore size of at least 8 microns and a CTE less than 15. Table 11 shows that when these compositions are fired at 1500° C., the amount of Y₂O₃must be less than 5% to maintain at least 38% porosity and greater than 0.1% to maintain a median pore size greater than 8 microns. It will be appreciated that even lower amounts of Y₂O₃could be utilized at 1500° C. if the weighted average of the median particle sizes of the raw materials was greater than 9.3 microns. FIGS. 3 and 4 show that an amount of Y₂O₃between 1 and 3% is especially preferred for this raw material combination because the porosity, pore size, and CTE are relatively stable within this range of metal oxide addition.
The examples in Tables 12 and 13 show that, in addition to yttrium oxide, the oxides of the lanthanides metals, and their combinations, are effective in obtaining inventive bodies with useful CTE, porosity, and pore size. Examples 48 and 57 demonstrate that the lanthanide oxides may be provided in the form of a calcined ore comprised primarily of the oxides of lanthanum, cerium, praseodymium, and dysprosium.
Tables 14 and 1.5 illustrate that a source of calcium oxide, in this case calcium carbonate, is also effective as a sintering additive to promote low CTE and coarse pore size without reducing porosity. However, sources of the oxides of strontium, indium, and tin do not constitute inventive additives because they either result in high CTE or low strength.
Tables 16 and 17 demonstrate that the oxides of molybdenum, boron, niobium, tungsten, zinc, and zirconium alone are not effective sintering additives. However, bismuth oxide does serve as a useful sintering additive, provided that the firing temperature is greater than 1400° C., and the raw materials have a median pore size greater than 6 microns.
In example C29, the median pore size is smaller than 8 microns because D₅₀of the inorganic raw materials is less than 6 microns. However, it will be appreciated that the median pore size the AT ceramic prepared with bismuth oxide addition can be increased to greater than 8 microns by the use of coarser raw materials while still preserving a CTE (RT−1000° C.) below 15×10⁻⁷° C.⁻¹and a porosity greater than 38%.
Table 18 shows that, by increasing the median particle size of the alumina sources, the median pore size can be increased and a narrow pore size distribution maintained even when the particle size of the titania source remains very small. FIG. 5 depicts the well interconnected porosity of Inventive Example 66.
The examples in Table 19 illustrate that the particle size of both the titania and alumina sources can be varied while maintaining the inventive properties. Coarse titania is especially useful for increasing the porosity of the fired body without the need for larger amounts of additional pore forming agent.
Example 72 also shows that a filter prepared from the inventive body exhibits a very low clean and soot-loaded pressure drop as a diesel particulate filter. The full pressure drop versus soot loading curve measured at room temperature and a flow rate of 210 standard cubic feet per minute is depicted in FIG. 6 and compared with the pressure drop curves for cordierite and silicon carbide filters of the same size and approximately the same volumetric heat capacity measured under the same test conditions.
The three filters are all approximately 5.66 inches diameter and 6 inches in length, and pressure drops were all measured at room temperature and a flow rate of 210 standard cubic feet per minute. The cordierite example has a cell density of 190 cells/inch²and 0.017 inch walls. The silicon carbide example has a cell density of 320 cells/inch²and 0.010 inch walls. The inventive example has a cell density of 311 cells/inch²and 0.011 inch walls. The figure demonstrates the excellent low pressure drop exhibited by filters of the inventive material.
The examples of Tables 20 to 22 demonstrate that the CTE, porosity, and median pore size of the inventive materials do not change greatly for firing temperatures from 1415 to 1475° C., and that the inventive properties are obtained whether the body is fired in an electric kiln or a gas kiln. The properties for Inventive Examples 89-93 are plotted against the firing temperature in FIG. 7.
Table 23 shows the changes in length, CTE, and MOR of an inventive body after cycling 300 times between 200 and 1100° C. in air. The small differences after thermal cycling demonstrate the excellent dimensional and physical stability of the inventive examples.

While the invention has been described with respect to a limited number of embodiments, those skilled in the art, having benefit of the disclosure, will appreciate that other embodiments can be devised which do not depart from the scope of the invention as disclosed herein. Accordingly, the scope of the invention should be limited only by the attached claims.

	TABLE 1


		Median Particle
		Diameter
	Raw Material	(microns)

	Alumina A	6.8
	Alumina B	9.0
	Alumina C	9.0
	Alumina D	23.8
	Alumina E	41.8
	Aluminum hydroxide A	11.5
	Aluminum hydroxide B	13.2
	Aluminum hydroxide C	21.0
	Titania A	0.50
	Titania B	13.7
	Titania C	22.7
	Kaolin A	9.9
	Quartz A	3.7
	Quartz B	23.4
	Quartz C	25.4
	Graphite A	35.0
	Graphite B	49.0

	TABLE 2


	Example Number

	C1	C2	C3	C4

% Al₂TiO₅	80	80	80	80
% Mullite	20	20	20	20

Weight Percent

Y₂O₃	—	—	2.78	2.78
Alumina A	53.52	53.52	53.52	53.52
Titania A	34.56	34.56	34.56	34.56
Kaolin A	11.92	11.92	11.92	11.92
Graphite A	25.00	25.00	25.00	25.00
MPS Alumina sources	6.8	6.8	6.8	6.8
MPS Titania source	0.50	0.50	0.50	0.50
MPS Quartz	—	—	—	—
MPS Inorganic Raw Materials	5.0	5.0	5.0	5.0

Firing and Properties

Firing Temperature (° C.)	1400	1500	1400	1500
Hold Time (hours)	4	4	4	4
CTE (RT-1000° C.)	44.8	28.1	12.3	5.7
% Porosity	48.8	51.4	47.9	38.9
d₅₀	3.9	3.8	5.8	7.4
d₁₀	—	—	—	—
d₉₀	—	—	—	—
(d₅₀− d₁₀)/d₅₀	—	—	—	—
(d₉₀− d₁₀)/d₅₀	—	—	—	—
MOR rod (psi)	2335	1490	1141	1073
Al₂TiO₅	M	M	M	M
Mullite	m	m	m	m
Al₂O₃	m	0	tr	tr
TiO₂	m	0	0	0

	TABLE 3


	Example Number

	C5	C6	C7	C8	C9	C10

% Al₂TiO₅	80	90	95	80	90	95
% Mullite	20	10	5	20	10	5

Weight Percent

MoO₃	—	—	—	—	—	—
Y₂O₃	—	—	—	—	—	—
Alumina C	41.48	39.94	39.18	41.48	39.94	39.18
Aluminum hydroxide B	20.00	20.00	20.00	20.00	20.00	20.00
Titania A	33.27	37.43	39.51	33.27	37.43	39.51
Quartz A	5.25	2.62	1.31	5.25	2.62	1.31
Graphite A	25.00	25.00	25.00	25.00	25.00	25.00
MPS Alumina sources	10.4	10.4	10.4	10.4	10.4	10.4
MPS Titania source	0.50	0.50	0.50	0.50	0.50	0.50
MPS Quartz	3.7	3.7	3.7	3.7	3.7	3.7
MPS Inorganic Raw Materials	6.7	6.5	6.4	6.7	6.5	6.4

Firing and Properties

Firing Temperature (° C.)	1400	1400	1400	1500	1500	1500
Hold Time (hours)	4	4	4	4	4	4
CTE (RT − 1000° C.)	50.1	44.3	36.8	33.5	28.2	22.7
% Porosity	49.8	50.4	49.9	52.6	55.4	54.6
d₅₀	4.4	4.4	4.6	6.7	6.2	6.3
d₁₀	2.2	2.1	2.1	3.4	3.1	3.2
d₉₀	9.0	8.7	8.4	14.5	20.6	13.2
(d₅₀− d₁₀)/d₅₀	0.50	0.51	0.53	0.50	0.51	0.50
(d₉₀− d₁₀)/d₅₀	1.55	1.50	1.36	1.66	2.83	1.60
MOR rod (psi)	2084	1264	1145	2209	1623	1523
Al₂TiO₅	M	M	M	M	M	M
Mullite	m	tr	0	m	tr	0
Al₂O₃	M	M	M	tr	m	m
TiO₂	M	M	M	tr	m	m

	TABLE 4


	Example Number

	1	2	3	4	5

% Al₂TiO₅	80	80	80	90	95
% Mullite	20	20	20	10	5

Weight Percent

MoO₃	—	2.61	1.30	—	—
Y₂O₃	2.78	1.39	2.78	2.73	1.35
Alumina C	41.48	41.48	41.48	39.94	39.18
Aluminum hydroxide B	20.00	20.00	20.00	20.00	20.00
Titania A	33.27	33.27	33.27	37.43	39.51
Quartz A	5.25	5.25	5.25	2.62	1.31
Graphite A	25.00	25.00	25.00	25.00	25.00
MPS Alumina sources	10.4	10.4	10.4	10.4	10.4
MPS Titania source	0.50	0.50	0.50	0.50	0.50
MPS Quartz	3.7	3.7	3.7	3.7	3.7
MPS Inorganic Raw	6.7	6.7	6.7	6.5	6.4
Materials

Firing and Properties

Firing Temperature

	1400	1400	1400	1400	1400
(° C.)
Hold Time (hours)	4	4	4	4	4
CTE (RT − 1000° C.)	6.8	4.1	3.2	−0.8	−5.1
% Porosity	51.8	53.7	54.5	45.9	46.4
d₅₀	9.2	8.5	9.7	8.5	8.3
d₁₀	5.8	5.3	6.4	6.1	5.7
d₉₀	17.6	17.9	20.4	30.2	15.1
(d₅₀− d₁₀)/d₅₀	0.37	0.37	0.34	0.28	0.31
(d₉₀− d₁₀)/d₅₀	1.28	1.48	1.44	2.83	1.13
MOR rod (psi)	602	793	586	946	897
Al₂TiO₅	M	M	M	M	M
Mullite	m	m	m	0	0
Al₂O₃	tr	tr	vm	tr	m
TiO₂	vm	tr	vm	tr	tr

	TABLE 5


	Example Number

	6	7	8	9	10	11	12

% Al₂TiO₅	80	80	80	80	90	90	95
% Mullite	20	20	20	20	10	10	5

Weight Percent

MoO₃	2.61	2.61	1.30	—	—	—	—
Y₂O₃	1.39	2.78	2.78	2.78	1.36	2.73	1.35
Alumina C	41.48	41.48	41.48	41.48	39.94	39.94	39.18
Aluminum hydroxide B	20.00	20.00	20.00	20.00	20.00	20.00	20.00
Titania A	33.27	33.27	33.27	33.27	37.43	37.43	39.51
Quartz A	5.25	5.25	5.25	5.25	2.62	2.62	1.31
Graphite A	25.00	25.00	25.00	25.00	25.00	25.00	25.00
MPS Alumina sources	10.4	10.4	10.4	10.4	10.4	10.4	10.4
MPS Titania source	0.50	0.50	0.50	0.50	0.50	0.50	0.50
MPS Quartz	3.7	3.7	3.7	3.7	3.7	3.7	3.7
MPS All Inorganic Raw Materials	6.7	6.7	6.7	6.7	6.5	6.5	6.4

Firing and Properties

Firing Temperature (° C.)	1500	1500	1500	1500	1500	1500	1500
Hold Time (hours)	4	4	4	4	4	4	4
CTE (RT − 1000° C.)	−3.6	−5.9	−2.8	0.8	−4.9	−7.6	−12.5
% Porosity	52.5	50.9	51.8	48.2	47.7	44.9	44.4
d₅₀	9.8	10.8	11.5	10.4	9.9	10.6	10.5
d₁₀	6.8	8.3	8.8	8.3	7.0	8.4	8.1
d₉₀	14.9	15.4	56.4	16.5	17.8	44.0	17.7
(d₅₀− d₁₀)/d₅₀	0.31	0.23	0.23	0.20	0.29	0.21	0.23
(d₉₀− d₁₀)/d₅₀	0.83	0.65	4.14	0.78	1.09	3.36	0.91
MOR rod (psi)	1040	1018	842	736	1063	1195	954
Al₂TiO₅	M	M	M	M	M	M	M
Mullite	m	m	m	m	tr	tr	0
Al₂O₃	m	m	m	tr	tr	m	tr
TiO₂	0	0	tr	tr	tr	tr	v s. tr

	TABLE 6


	Example Number

	13	14	15	16	17

% Al₂TiO₅	80	80	80	80	80
% Mullite	20	20	20	20	20

Weight Percent

MoO₃	2.00	2.00	—	2.00	—
Y₂O₃	2.00	2.00	2.00	2.00	2.00
Alumina C	41.48	41.48	41.48	36.18	36.18
Aluminum hydroxide C	20.00	20.00	20.00	20.00	20.00
Titania A	33.27	33.27	33.27	32.73	32.73
Kaolin A	—	—	—	11.09	11.09
Quartz B	5.25	5.25	5.25	—	—
Graphite A	25.00	—	—	—	—
Graphite B	—	25.00	25.00	25.00	25.00
MPS Alumina sources	12.9	12.9	12.9	13.3	13.3
MPS Titania source	0.50	0.50	0.50	0.50	0.50
MPS Quartz	23.4	23.4	23.4	—	—
MPS All Inorganic Raw	9.3	9.3	9.3	8.7	8.7
Materials

Firing and Properties

Firing Temperature

	1400	1400	1400	1400	1400
(° C.)
Hold Time (hours)	4	4	4	4	4
CTE (RT − 1000° C.)	6.6	0.5	8.3	1.7	4.8
% Porosity	49.2	52.1	49.5	53.4	51.2
d₅₀	10.1	11.1	10.5	8.6	8.6
d₁₀	6.3	6.7	6.0	4.9	4.6
d₉₀	14.2	13.1	23.4	17.7	19.7
(d₅₀− d₁₀)/d₅₀	0.37	0.40	0.42	0.43	0.46
(d₉₀− d₁₀)/d₅₀	0.79	0.58	1.65	1.48	1.76
MOR rod (psi)	710	721	793	604	768
Al₂TiO₅	M	M	M	M	M
Mullite	m	m	m	m	m
Al₂O₃	tr	tr	tr	tr	tr
TiO₂	tr	tr	tr	tr	tr

	TABLE 7


	Example Number

	18	19	20	21	22

% Al₂TiO₅	70	70	70	70	70
% Mullite	30	30	30	30	30

Weight Percent

MoO₃	2.00	2.00	—	2.00	—
Y₂O₃	2.00	2.00	2.00	2.00	2.00
Alumina C	43.01	43.01	43.01	35.10	35.10
Aluminum hydroxide C	20.00	20.00	20.00	20.00	20.00
Titania A	29.12	29.12	29.12	28.40	28.40
Kaolin A	—	—	—	16.50	16.50
Quartz B	7.87	7.87	7.87	—	—
Graphite A	25.00	—	—	—	—
Graphite B	—	25.00	25.00	25.00	25.00
MPS Alumina sources	12.8	12.8	12.8	13.4	13.4
MPS Titania source	0.50	0.50	0.50	0.50	0.50
MPS Quartz	23.4	23.4	23.4	—	—
MPS All Inorganic Raw	10.1	10.1	10.1	9.1	9.1
Materials

Firing and Properties

Firing Temperature

	1400	1400	1400	1400	1400
(° C.)
Hold Time (hours)	4	4	4	4	4
CTE (RT − 1000° C.)	8.9	8.6	8.4	14.0	14.1
% Porosity	51.5	53.9	52.7	53.8	54.0
d₅₀	10.3	11.1	11.3	8.1	8.1
d₁₀	6.1	5.9	5.8	4.4	4.0
d₉₀	15.3	21.2	22.9	14.9	18.8
(d₅₀− d₁₀)/d₅₀	0.41	0.47	0.48	0.46	0.50
(d₉₀− d₁₀)/d₅₀	0.89	1.39	1.52	1.30	1.81
MOR rod (psi)	876	663	1091	726	765
Al₂TiO₅	M	M	M	M	M
Mullite	m	m	m	m	m
Al₂O₃	tr	tr	tr	v.s.tr	s.tr
TiO₂	tr	tr	tr	v.s.tr	s.tr

	TABLE 8


	Example Number

	23	24	25	26	27

% Al₂TiO₅	80	80	80	80	80
% Mullite	20	20	20	20	20

Weight Percent

Firing and Properties

Firing Temperature	1500	1500	1500	1500	1500
(° C.)
Hold Time (hours)	4	4	4	4	4
CTE (RT − 1000° C.)	−2.0	−8.4	0.1	−4.5	−2.2
% Porosity	47.6	50.2	47.0	50.7	47.3
d₅₀	11.2	11.6	11.6	10.0	10.0
d₁₀	8.2	—	7.6	6.5	6.8
d₉₀	37.3	—	20.8	19.4	19.2
(d₅₀− d₁₀)/d₅₀	0.27	—	0.34	0.35	0.32
(d₉₀− d₁₀)/d₅₀	2.60	—	1.14	1.29	1.24
MOR rod (psi)	593	489	706	489	670
Al₂TiO₅	M	M	M	M	M
Mullite	m	m	m	m	m
Al₂O₃	v.s.tr	v.s.tr	s.tr	s.tr	tr
TiO₂	v.s.tr	v.s.tr	s.tr	v.s.tr	v.s.tr

	TABLE 9


	Example Number

	28	29	30	31	32

% Al₂TiO₅	70	70	70	70	70
% Mullite	30	30	30	30	30

Weight Percent

Firing and Properties

Firing Temperature	1500	1500	1500	1500	1500
(° C.)
Hold Time (hours)	4	4	4	4	4
CTE (RT − 1000° C.)	2.9	0.6	0.7	3.3	2.8
% Porosity	49.2	53.7	50.0	49.3	49.8
d₅₀	11.0	12.6	12.4	9.1	9.4
d₁₀	7.5	8.1	7.8	5.5	5.7
d₉₀	16.2	20.1	27.0	25.2	19.8
(d₅₀− d₁₀)/d₅₀	0.32	0.36	0.37	0.39	0.40
(d₉₀− d₁₀)/d₅₀	0.79	0.96	1.55	2.16	1.51
MOR rod (psi)	694	630	780	753	728
Al₂TiO₅	M	M	M	M	M
Mullite	m	m	m	m	m
Al₂O₃	s.tr	v.s.tr	v.s.tr	v.s.tr	v.s.tr
TiO₂	v.s.tr	v.s.tr	v.s.tr	0	v.s.tr

	TABLE 10


	Example Number

	33	34	35	C11	C12	C13

% Al₂TiO₅	80	80	80	80	80	80
% Mullite	20	20	20	20	20	20

Weight Percent

Y₂O₃	5.00	2.00	1.00	0.50	0.20	0.10
Alumina C	41.48	41.48	41.48	41.48	41.48	41.48
Aluminum hydroxide C	20.00	20.00	20.00	20.00	20.00	20.00
Titania A	33.27	33.27	33.27	33.27	33.27	33.27
Quartz B	5.25	5.25	5.25	5.25	5.25	5.25
Graphite A	25.00	25.00	25.00	25.00	25.00	25.00
MPS Alumina sources	12.9	12.9	12.9	12.9	12.9	12.9
MPS Titania source	0.50	0.50	0.50	0.50	0.50	0.50
MPS Quartz	23.4	23.4	23.4	23.4	23.4	23.4
MPS All Inorganic Raw Materials	9.3	9.3	9.3	9.3	9.3	9.3

Firing and Properties

Firing Temperature (° C.)	1400	1400	1400	1400	1400	1400
Hold Time (hours)	4	4	4	4	4	4
CTE (RT − 1000° C.)	6.0	5.7	9.2	14.9	21.9	35.5
% Porosity	44.7	48.0	52.2	51.4	47.6	49.3
d₅₀	9.9	9.2	8.8	7.2	6.0	5.8
d₁₀	7.3	5.9	5.6	—	—	—
d₉₀	14.5	14.0	14.4	—	—	—
(d₅₀− d₁₀)/d₅₀	0.26	0.36	0.36	—	—	—
(d₉₀− d₁₀)/d₅₀	0.73	0.88	1.00	—	—	—
MOR rod (psi)	1213	1174	1450	916	1003	1048
Al₂TiO₅	—	—	—	—	—	—
Mullite	—	—	—	—	—	—
Al₂O₃	—	—	—	—	—	—
TiO₂	—	—	—	—	—	—

	TABLE 11


	Example Number

	C14	36	37	38	39	C15

% Al₂TiO₅	80	80	80	80	80	80
% Mullite	20	20	20	20	20	20

Weight Percent

Firing and Properties

Firing Temperature (° C.)	1500	1500	1500	1500	1500	1500
Hold Time (hours)	4	4	4	4	4	4
CTE (RT − 1000° C.)	−0.9	−2.8	−2.1	3.8	6.5	10.7
% Porosity	36.8	47.2	49.9	51.2	52.6	55.2
d₅₀	13.5	10.6	10.1	9.1	8.0	7.7
d₁₀	—	7.7	6.4	5.4	4.4	—
d₉₀	—	14.6	15.3	12.8	11.4	—
(d₅₀− d₁₀)/d₅₀	—	0.27	0.37	0.41	0.45	—
(d₉₀− d₁₀)/d₅₀	—	0.65	0.88	0.81	0.88	—
MOR rod (psi)	942	751	819	808	831	909
Al₂TiO₅	—	—	—	—	—	—
Mullite	—	—	—	—	—	—
Al₂O₃	—	—	—	—	—	—
TiO₂	—	—	—	—	—	—

	TABLE 12


	Example Number

	40	41	42	43	44	45	46	47	48

% Al₂TiO₅	70	70	70	70	70	70	70	70	70
% Mullite	30	30	30	30	30	30	30	30	30

Weight Percent

Y₂O₃	2.63	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
CeO₂	—	3.84	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
La₂O₃	—	—	3.42	—	—	—	—	—	—
Nd₂O₃	—	—	—	3.81	—	—	—	—	—
Pr₆O₁₁	—	—	—	—	3.63	—	—	—	—
Sm₂O₃	—	—	—	—	—	3.89	—	—	—
Gd₂O₃	—	—	—	—	—	—	3.90	—	—
Dy₂O₃	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	4.10	—
Calcined Bastnasite	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	4.90
Alumina C	43.01	43.01	43.01	43.01	43.01	43.01	43.01	43.01	43.01
Aluminum hydroxide C	20.00	20.00	20.00	20.00	20.00	20.00	20.00	20.00	20.00
Titania A	29.12	29.12	29.12	29.12	29.12	29.12	29.12	29.12	29.12
Quartz C	7.87	7.87	7.87	7.87	7.87	7.87	7.87	7.87	7.87
Graphite A	25.00	25.00	25.00	25.00	25.00	25.00	25.00	25.00	25.00
MPS Alumina sources	12.8	12.8	12.8	12.8	12.8	12.8	12.8	12.8	12.8
MPS Titania source	0.50	0.50	0.50	0.50	0.50	0.50	0.50	0.50	0.50
MPS Quartz	25.4	25.4	25.4	25.4	25.4	25.4	25.4	25.4	25.4
MPS Inorganic Raw	10.2	10.2	10.2	10.2	10.2	10.2	10.2	10.2	10.2
Materials

Firing and Properties

Firing Temperature (° C.)	1400	1400	1400	1400	1400	1400	1400	1400	1400
Hold Time (hours)	4	4	4	4	4	4	4	4	4
CTE (RT − 1000° C.)	5.7	8.2	11.9	6.1	6.4	8.9	11.0	7.4	11.4
% Porosity	47.7	39.6	42.1	39.9	40.5	43.2	44.4	48.4	45.1
d₅₀	9.9	11.8	9.3	10.5	10.2	11.0	9.8	10.4	11.6
d₁₀	6.6	8.6	6.3	7.6	7.2	7.8	6.4	7.0	8.5
d₉₀	16.0	19.1	15.3	18.0	36.6	25.9	17.7	18.3	20.8
(d₅₀− d₁₀)/d₅₀	0.33	0.27	0.32	0.28	0.29	0.29	0.35	0.33	0.27
(d₉₀− d₁₀)/d₅₀	0.95	0.89	0.97	0.99	2.88	1.65	1.15	1.09	1.06
MOR rod (psi)	1055	1362	1504	1299	1193	1270	1155	1015	1355
Al₂TiO₅	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
Mullite	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
Al₂O₃	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
TiO₂	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—

	TABLE 13


	Example Number

	49	50	51	52	53	54	55	56	57

% Al₂TiO₅	70	70	70	70	70	70	70	70	70
% Mullite	30	30	30	30	30	30	30	30	30

Weight Percent

Firing and Properties

Firing Temperature (° C.)	1500	1500	1500	1500	1500	1500	1500	1500	1500
Hold Time (hours)	4	4	4	4	4	4	4	4	4
CTE (RT − 1000° C.)	−0.9	1.0	4.6	3.5	2.7	1.5	1.0	0.0	4.3
% Porosity	43.7	41.4	42.9	40.2	38.7	42.4	44.0	44.9	44.2
d₅₀	12.0	13.2	10.8	12.2	12.3	12.9	11.9	12.3	13.7
d₁₀	8.9	9.7	7.9	9.2	9.5	9.9	8.9	9.1	10.6
d₉₀	19.6	23.0	19.5	19.2	19.6	19.6	20.0	21.6	40.4
(d₅₀− d₁₀)/d₅₀	0.26	0.27	0.27	0.25	0.23	0.23	0.25	0.26	0.23
(d₉₀− d₁₀)/d₅₀	0.89	1.01	1.07	0.82	0.82	0.75	0.93	1.02	2.18
MOR rod (psi)	931	1106	1188	1218	1208	1095	1011	940	1011
Al₂TiO₅	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
Mullite	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
Al₂O₃	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
TiO₂	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—

	TABLE 14


	Example Number

	58	59	C16	C17	C18

% Al₂TiO₅	80	80	80	80	80
% Mullite	20	20	20	20	20

Weight Percent

Y₂O₃	2.78	—	—	—	—
CaCO₃	—	1.88		—	—
SrCO₃	—	—	2.61	—	—
In₂O₃	—	—	—	3.88	—
SnO₂	—	—	—	—	3.86
Alumina C	41.48	41.48	41.48	41.48	41.48
Aluminum hydroxide C	20.00	20.00	20.00	20.00	20.00
Titania A	33.27	33.27	33.27	33.27	33.27
Quartz B	5.25	5.25	5.25	5.25	5.25
Quartz C	—	—	—	—	—
Graphite A	25.00	25.00	25.00	25.00	25.00
MPS Alumina sources	12.9	12.9	12.9	12.9	12.9
MPS Titania source	0.50	0.50	0.50	0.50	0.50
MPS Quartz	23.4	23.4	23.4	23.4	23.4
MPS All Inorganic	9.3	9.3	9.3	9.3	9.3
Raw Materials

Firing and Properties

Firing Temperature	1400	1400	1400	1400	1400
(° C.)
Hold Time (hours)	4	4	4	4	4
CTE (RT − 1000° C.)	5.3	14.0	30.0	45.3	63.4
% Porosity	47.7	49.8	48.7	52.7	48.1
d₅₀	9.4	10.4	7.6	6.1	4.2
d₁₀	5.9	6.8	—	—	—
d₉₀	12.4	19.4	—	—	—
(d₅₀− d₁₀)/d₅₀	0.37	0.35	—	—	—
(d₉₀− d₁₀)/d₅₀	0.69	1.21	—	—	—
MOR rod (psi)	904	1207	1266	877	1778
Al₂TiO₅	M	M	M	M	M
Mullite	m	0	0	m	m
Al₂O₃	tr	m	m	m	M
TiO₂	tr	m	m	M	M

	TABLE 15


	Example Number

	60	61	C19	C20	C21

% Al₂TiO₅	80	80	80	80	80
% Mullite	20	20	20	20	20

Weight Percent

Y₂O₃	2.78	—	—	—	—
CaCO₃	—	1.88	—	—	—
SrCO₃	—	—	2.61	—	—
In₂O₃	—	—	—	3.88	—
SnO₂	—	—	—		3.86
Alumina C	41.48	41.48	41.48	41.48	41.48
Aluminum hydroxide C	20.00	20.00	20.00	20.00	20.00
Titania A	33.27	33.27	33.27	33.27	33.27
Quartz B	5.25	5.25	5.25	5.25	5.25
Graphite A	25.00	25.00	25.00	25.00	25.00
MPS Alumina sources	12.9	12.9	12.9	12.9	12.9
MPS Titania source	0.50	0.50	0.50	0.50	0.50
MPS Quartz	23.4	23.4	23.4	23.4	23.4
MPS All Inorganic	9.3	9.3	9.3	9.3	9.3
Raw Materials

Firing and Properties

Firing Temperature	1500	1500	1500	1500	1500
(° C.)
Hold Time (hours)	4	4	4	4	4
CTE (RT − 1000° C.)	−1.6	11.3	16.9	12.1	28.6
% Porosity	44.9	44.0	49.5	53.7	54.8
d₅₀	11.4	10.4	10.5	11.6	6.9
d₁₀	8.6	7.8	—	—	—
d₉₀	15.2	28.6	—	—	—
(d₅₀− d₁₀)/d₅₀	0.25	0.25	—	—	—
(d₉₀− d₁₀)/d₅₀	0.58	2.00	—	—	—
MOR rod (psi)	823	873	828	480	765
Al₂TiO₅	M	M	M	M	M
Mullite	m	tr	0	m	m
Al₂O₃	tr	m	m	v.s.tr	tr
TiO₂	v.s.tr	tr	m	tr	tr

	TABLE 16


	Example Number

	C22	C23	C24	C25	C26	C27	C28

% Al₂TiO₅	80	80	80	80	80	80	80
% Mullite	20	20	20	20	20	20	20

Weight Percent

Bi₂O₃	4.75	—	—	—	—	—	—
MoO₃	—	2.61	—	—	—	—	—
B₂O₃	—	—	1.37	—	—	—	—
Nb₂O₅	—	—	—	2.48	—	—	—
WO₃	—	—	—	—	3.98	—	—
ZnO	—	—	—	—	—	3.11	—
ZrO₂	—	—	—	—	—	—	3.11
Alumina A	53.52	53.52	53.52	53.52	53.52	53.52	53.52
Titania A	34.56	34.56	34.56	34.56	34.56	34.56	34.56
Kaolin A	11.92	11.92	11.92	11.92	11.92	11.92	11.92
Graphite A	25.00	25.00	25.00	25.00	25.00	25.00	25.00
MPS Alumina sources	6.8	6.8	6.8	6.8	6.8	6.8	6.8
MPS Titania source	0.50	0.50	0.50	0.50	0.50	0.50	0.50
MPS Quartz	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
MPS All Inorganic Raw Materials	5.0	5.0	5.0	5.0	5.0	5.0	5.0

Firing and Properties

Firing Temperature (° C.)	1400	1400	1400	1400	1400	1400	1400
Hold Time (hours)	4	4	4	4	4	4	4
CTE (RT − 1000° C.)	37.1	26.4	36.5	41.4	50.6	36.5	43.7
% Porosity	49.1	52.3	51.8	51.0	53.8	47.9	50.2
d₅₀	5.2	4.5	4.1	2.8	2.8	3.7	3.0
d₁₀	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
d₉₀	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
(d₅₀− d₁₀)/d₅₀	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
(d₉₀− d₁₀)/d₅₀	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
MOR rod (psi)	1416	1164	1599	2165	1817	1827	2094
Al₂TiO₅	M	M	M	M	M	M	M
Mullite	m	m	m	m	m	m	m
Al₂O₃	m	tr	tr	M	M	0	tr
TiO₂	m	tr	m	M	M	tr	0

	TABLE 17


	Example Number

	C29	C30	C31	C32	C33	C34	C35

% Al₂TiO₅	80	80	80	80	80	80	80
% Mullite	20	20	20	20	20	20	20

Weight Percent

Firing and Properties

Firing Temperature (° C.)	1500	1500	1500	1500	1500	1500	1500
Hold Time (hours)	4	4	4	4	4	4	4
CTE (RT − 1000° C.)	9.0	16.5	30.3	26.2	24.8	24.7	20.0
% Porosity	41.9	55.1	51.8	48.6	51.4	46.7	50.7
d₅₀	5.1	4.0	4.1	5.0	5.2	4.3	4.9
d₁₀	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
d₉₀	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
(d₅₀− d₁₀)/d₅₀	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
(d₉₀− d₁₀)/d₅₀	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
MOR rod (psi)	966	881	1120	1131	959	1343	1027
Al₂TiO₅	M	M	M	M	M	M	M
Mullite	m	m	m	m	m	m	m
Al₂O₃	tr	tr	v.s.tr	0	tr	0	0
TiO₂	tr	tr	v.s.tr	tr	m	0	0

	TABLE 18


	Example Number

	63	64	65	66	67	68	69	70

% Al₂TiO₅	70	70	70	70	70	70	70	70
% Mullite	30	30	30	30	30	30	30	30

Weight Percent

Y₂O₃	2.63	2.63	2.63	2.63	2.63	2.63	2.63	2.63
Alumina A	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
Alumina B	43.01	—	—	—	43.01	—	—	—
Alumina C	—	43.01	—	—	—	43.01	—	—
Alumina D	—	—	43.01	—	—	—	43.01	—
Alumina E	—	—	—	43.01	—	—	—	43.01
Aluminum hydroxide C	20.00	20.00	20.00	20.00	20.00	20.00	20.00	20.00
Titania A	29.12	29.12	29.12	29.12	29.12	29.12	29.12	29.12
Quartz C	7.87	7.87	7.87	7.87	7.87	7.87	7.87	7.87
Graphite A	25.00	25.00	25.00	25.00	25.00	25.00	25.00	25.00
MPS Alumina sources	12.8	12.8	22.9	35.2	12.8	12.8	22.9	35.2
MPS Titania source	0.50	0.50	0.50	0.50	0.50	0.50	0.50	0.50
MPS Quartz	25.4	25.4	25.4	25.4	25.4	25.4	25.4	25.4
MPS Inorganic Raw Materials	10.2	10.2	16.6	24.3	10.2	10.2	16.6	24.3

Firing and Properties

Firing Temperature (° C.)	1400	1400	1400	1400	1500	1500	1500	1500
Hold Time (hours)	4	4	4	4	4	4	4	4
CTE (RT − 1000° C.)	10.4	9.8	7.5	6.1	1.4	2.8	−0.7	−3.8
% Porosity	44.7	50.3	48.2	50.0	41.6	45.2	47.8	48.4
d₅₀	8.7	10.0	13.7	17.6	9.8	11.4	15.1	21.4
d₁₀	5.8	6.5	9.5	12.8	7.3	8.3	10.6	15.0
d₉₀	12.4	15.5	20.1	26.5	13.7	20.2	26.9	31.2
(d₅₀− d₁₀)/d₅₀	0.33	0.35	0.31	0.27	0.25	0.27	0.30	0.30
(d₉₀− d₁₀)/d₅₀	0.76	0.90	0.78	0.78	0.65	1.05	1.08	0.75
MOR rod (psi)	1439	1174	959	710	1175	1017	753	505
Al₂TiO₅	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
Mullite	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
Al₂O₃	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
TiO₂	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—

	TABLE 19


	Example Number

	71	72	73	74	75

% Al₂TiO₅	70	70	70	70	70
% Mullite	30	30	30	30	30

Weight Percent

Y₂O₃	2.50	2.50	2.63	2.63	2.50
Alumina C	—	—	43.01	43.01	43.01
Alumina E	43.01	43.01	—	—	—
Aluminum hydroxide	20.00	20.00	20.00	20.00	20.00
C
Titania A	29.12	29.12	—	—	—
Titania B	—	—	29.12	29.12	—
Titania C	—	—	—	—	31.83
Quartz C	7.87	7.87	7.87	7.87	7.87
Graphite A	25.00	25.00	25.00	25.00	25.00
MPS Alumina sources	35.2	35.2	12.8	12.8	12.8
MPS Titania source	0.50	0.50	13.69	13.69	22.68
MPS Quartz	25.4	25.4	25.4	25.4	25.4
MPS All Inorganic	24.3	24.3	14.1	14.1	16.8
Raw Materials

Firing and Properties

Firing Temperature	1450	1450	1400	1500	1450
(° C.)
Hold Time (hours)	6	8	4	4	6
CTE (RT − 1000° C.)	0.8	−2.7	12.5	5.1	6.3
% Porosity	48.4	49.0	56.9	53.9	58.0
d₅₀	18.1	18.8	13.3	15.5	12.4
d₁₀	12.2	12.7	9.8	11.8	10.2
d₉₀	26.4	30.8	17.6	19.7	22.3
(d₅₀− d₁₀)/d₅₀	0.33	0.32	0.26	0.24	0.18
(d₉₀− d₁₀)/d₅₀	0.78	0.97	0.59	0.51	0.97
MOR rod (psi)	—	—	646	520	—
Diameter (cm)	—	14.46	—	—	—
Height (cm)	—	15.29	—	—	—
Cells per square inch	—	311	—	—	—
Wall Thickness	—	11.2	—	—	—
(10⁻³in)
Mass (g)	—	1713	—	—	—
Approx. Filter Bulk	—	0.681	—	—	—
Density (g/cm³)
Pressure drop at 0 g/L,	—	1.54	—	—	—
210 scfm (kPa)
Pressure drop at 5 g/L,	—	3.87	—	—	—
210 scfm (kPa)

	TABLE 20


	Example Number

	76	77	78	79	80	81

% Al₂TiO₅	80	80	80	80	80	80
% Mullite	20	20	20	20	20	20

Weight Percent

MoO₃	2.00	2.00	2.00	2.00	2.00	2.00
Y₂O₃	2.00	2.00	2.00	2.00	2.00	2.00
Alumina C	41.48	41.48	41.48	41.48	41.48	41.48
Aluminum hydroxide A	20.00	20.00	20.00	20.00	20.00	20.00
Titania A	33.27	33.27	33.27	33.27	33.27	33.27
Quartz A	5.25	5.25	5.25	5.25	5.25	5.25
Graphite A	25.00	25.00	25.00	25.00	25.00	25.00
MPS Alumina sources	9.8	9.8	9.8	9.8	9.8	9.8
MPS Titania source	0.5	0.5	0.5	0.5	0.5	0.5
MPS Quartz	3.7	3.7	3.7	3.7	3.7	3.7
MPS All Inorganic Raw Materials	6.4	6.4	6.4	6.4	6.4	6.4

Firing and Properties

Firing Temperature (° C.)	1415	1435	1435	1435	1455	1475
Hold Time (hours)	8	6	6	6	6	6
Kiln Type (E = electric, G = gas)	E	G	E	G	G	E
CTE (RT − 1000° C.)	−2.3	−3.6	−4.1	1.1	−0.2	−6.1
% Porosity	50.5	48.7	49.3	51.1	50.0	47.7
d₅₀	10.0	9.2	9.7	9.7	9.9	10.4
d₁₀	—	6.1	6.4	6.3	7.1	7.4
d₉₀	—	12.8	13.7	13.6	13.7	14.1
(d₅₀− d₁₀)/d₅₀	—	0.33	0.34	0.35	0.29	0.29
(d₉₀− d₁₀)/d₅₀	—	0.72	0.76	0.75	0.67	0.65
Diameter (cm)	—	—	4.95	—	—	—
Height (cm)	—	—	15.24	—	—	—
Cells per square inch	—	—	191	—	—	—
Wall Thickness (10⁻³in)	—	—	14.0	—	—	—
Mass (g)	—	—	211.8	—	—	—
Approx. Filter Bulk Density (g/cm³)	—	—	0.721	—	—	—
Pressure drop at 0 g/L, 26.25 scfm (kPa)	—	—	1.87	—	—	—
Pressure drop at 5 g/L, 26.25 scfm (kPa)	—	—	4.51	—	—	—

	TABLE 21


	Example Number

	82	83	84	85	86	87	88

% Al₂TiO₅	80	80	80	80	80	80	80
% Mullite	20	20	20	20	20	20	20

Weight Percent

Y₂O₃	2.00	2.00	2.00	2.00	2.00	2.00	2.00
Alumina C	41.48	41.48	41.48	41.48	41.48	41.48	41.48
Aluminum hydroxide A	20.00	20.00	20.00	20.00	20.00	20.00	20.00
Titania A	33.27	33.27	33.27	33.27	33.27	33.27	33.27
Quartz A	5.25	5.25	5.25	5.25	5.25	5.25	5.25
Graphite A	25.00	25.00	25.00	25.00	25.00	25.00	25.00
MPS Alumina sources	9.8	9.8	9.8	9.8	9.8	9.8	9.8
MPS Titania source	0.5	0.5	0.5	0.5	0.5	0.5	0.5
MPS Quartz	3.7	3.7	3.7	3.7	3.7	3.7	3.7
MPS All Inorganic Raw Materials	6.4	6.4	6.4	6.4	6.4	6.4	6.4

Firing and Properties

Firing Temperature (° C.)	1415	1435	1455	1465	1475	1475	1435
Hold Time (hours)	8	6	6	4	6	6	6
Kiln Type (E = electric, G = gas)	E	G	G	E	E	G	E
CTE (RT − 1000° C.)	−0.5	−3.5	0.7	−5.1	−4.3	−0.3	—
% Porosity	48.3	48.7	48.5	46.5	46.9	49.9	—
d₅₀	9.7	9.5	10.5	10.2	10.5	10.7	—
d₁₀	—	6.4	7.4	—	7.4	7.8	—
d₉₀	—	13.1	14.7	—	15.0	14.8	—
(d₅₀− d₁₀)/d₅₀	—	0.33	0.30	—	0.29	0.28	—
(d₉₀− d₁₀)/d₅₀	—	0.71	0.70	—	0.72	0.66	—
Diameter (cm)	—	—	—	4.83	—	—	4.89
Height (cm)	—	—	—	15.30	—	—	15.24
Cells per square inch	—	—	—	208	—	—	203
Wall Thickness (10⁻³in)	—	—	—	13.6	—	—	12.7
Mass (g)	—	—	—	214.9	—	—	207.2
Approx. Filter Bulk Density (g/cm³)	—	—	—	0.767	—	—	0.724
Pressure drop at 0 g/L, 26.25 scfm	—	—	—	2.02	—	—	1.94
(kPa)
Pressure drop at 5 g/L, 26.25 scfm	—	—	—	5.48	—	—	4.86
(kPa)

	TABLE 22


	Example Number

	89	90	91	92	93

% Al₂TiO₅	70	70	70	70	70
% Mullite	30	30	30	30	30

Weight Percent

Y₂O₃	2.00	2.00	2.00	2.00	2.00
Alumina C	43.01	43.01	43.01	43.01	43.01
Aluminum hydroxide C	20.00	20.00	20.00	20.00	20.00
Titania A	29.12	29.12	29.12	29.12	29.12
Quartz C	7.87	7.87	7.87	7.87	7.87
Graphite A	25.00	25.00	25.00	25.00	25.00
MPS Alumina sources	12.8	12.8	12.8	12.8	12.8
MPS Titania source	0.5	0.5	0.5	0.5	0.5
MPS Quartz	25.4	25.4	25.4	25.4	25.4
MPS All Inorganic Raw Materials	10.2	10.2	10.2	10.2	10.2

Firing and Properties

Firing Temperature (° C.)	1415	1435	1435	1455	1475
Hold Time (hours)	8	6	6	6	6
Kiln Type (E = electric, G = gas)	E	G	E	G	E
CTE (RT − 1000° C.)	6.5	4.1	5.1	3.9	3.6
% Porosity	47.8	51.8	49.3	50.5	48.4
d₅₀	10.5	10.4	10.4	10.7	11.5
d₁₀	—	6.6	6.9	—	7.6
d₉₀	—	15.8	17.0	—	16.8
(d₅₀− d₁₀)/d₅₀	—	0.36	0.34	—	0.34
(d₉₀− d₁₀)/d₅₀	—	0.88	0.97	—	0.80
Diameter (cm)	—	—	4.91	4.96	—
Height (cm)	—	—	15.24	15.34	—
Cells per square inch	—	—	202	194	—
Wall Thickness (10⁻³in)	—	—	13.6	14.1	—
Mass (g)	—	—	207.1	205.4	—
Approx. Filter Bulk Density (g/cm³)	—	—	0.716	0.693	—
Pressure drop at 0 g/L, 26.25 scfm (kPa)	—	—	1.89	1.73	—
Pressure drop at 5 g/L, 26.25 scfm (kPa)	—	—	5.02	4.88	—

	TABLE 23


		Example Number
		94

	% Al₂TiO₅	80
	% Mullite	20

Weight Percent

	Y₂O₃	2.00
	Alumina B	41.48
	Aluminum hydroxide C	20.00
	Titania A	33.27
	Quartz B	5.25
	Graphite A	25
	MPS Alumina sources	12.9
	MPS Titania source	0.50
	MPS Quartz	23.4
	MPS All Inorganic Raw Materials	9.3

Firing and Properties

	Firing Temperature (° C.)	1425
	Hold Time (hours)	10
	% Porosity	48.8
	d₅₀	10.2

	Pre-	Post-
	Cycled	Cycled

% Length Change	—	+0.21%
CTE (RT-1000° C.) on rod	−2.2	−3.6
MOR rod (psi)	825	815

Claims

1. A diesel exhaust particulate filter, comprising:

a phase of aluminum titanate and a narrow pore size distribution as characterized by the relation (d₅₀−d₁₀)/d₅₀being less than 0.50.

2. The particulate filter of claim 1 further comprising (d₅₀−d₁₀)/d₅₀being less than 0.35.

3. The particulate filter of claim 1 further comprising (d₅₀−d₁₀)/d₅₀being less than 0.25.

4. The particulate filter of claim 1 further comprising (d₅₀−d₁₀)/d₅₀being 0.23 or less.

5. The particulate filter of claim 1 wherein the relation (d₅₀−d₁₀)/d₅₀is less than 0.50 and greater than 0.18.

6. The particulate filter of claim 1 further comprising a phase of mullite.

7. The particulate filter of claim 1 further exhibiting a coefficient of thermal expansion (RT−1000° C.) less than 15×10⁻⁷C⁻¹.

8. The particulate filter of claim 1 further exhibiting a coefficient of thermal expansion (RT−1000° C.) not greater than 10×10⁻⁷C⁻¹.

9. The particulate filter of claim 1 further exhibiting a porosity of at least 38% by volume.

10. The particulate filter of claim 1 further exhibiting a porosity of between 45-60% by volume.

11. The particulate filter of claim 1 further exhibiting a median pore diameter of at least 8 microns.

12. The particulate filter of claim 11 further exhibiting a median pore diameter of between 10-20 microns.

13. The particulate filter of claim 1 further exhibiting a modulus of rupture (MOR) using the four point method on a cylindrical rod, of at least 450 psi.

14. The particulate filter of claim 1 further exhibiting modulus of rupture (MOR) using the four point method on a cylindrical rod, of at least 500 psi.

15. The particulate filter of claim 1 further exhibiting modulus of rupture (MOR) using the four point method on a cylindrical rod, of at least 600 psi.

16. The particulate filter of claim 1 further exhibiting modulus of rupture (MOR) using the four point method on a cylindrical rod, of at least 700 psi.

17. The particulate filter of claim 1 further exhibiting a set of properties including a coefficient of thermal expansion (RT−1000° C.) less than 10×10⁻⁷C⁻¹, a porosity of between 45-60% by volume, and a median pore diameter of between 10-20 microns.

18. The ceramic body of claim 17 further comprising a narrow pore size distribution as characterized by the relation (d₅₀-d₁₀)/d₅₀being less than 0.35.

19. The particulate filter of claim 1 further comprising a plugged, wall-flow honeycomb body having a plurality of parallel plugged cell channels traversing the body from a frontal inlet end to an outlet end thereof.

20. A honeycomb ceramic body, comprising:

a phase of aluminum titanate and a narrow pore size distribution as characterized by the relation (d₅₀−d₁₀)/d₅₀being less than 0.5, and

a coefficient of thermal expansion (RT−1000° C.) less than 15×10⁻⁷C⁻¹.

21. The honeycomb ceramic body of claim 20 further comprising a porosity of greater than 38% by volume.

22. The honeycomb ceramic body of claim 20 further comprising a porosity of between 45-60% by volume.

23. The honeycomb ceramic body of claim 20 further comprising a median pore diameter of between 10-20 microns.

24. The honeycomb ceramic body of claim 1 further exhibiting a coefficient of thermal expansion (RT−1000° C.) not greater than 10×10⁻⁷C⁻¹.