US20080047191A1 - Wildlife control apparatus - Google Patents
Wildlife control apparatus Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- US20080047191A1 US20080047191A1 US11/845,245 US84524507A US2008047191A1 US 20080047191 A1 US20080047191 A1 US 20080047191A1 US 84524507 A US84524507 A US 84524507A US 2008047191 A1 US2008047191 A1 US 2008047191A1
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- predator
- motor
- cable
- wildlife
- sensors
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Abandoned
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A01—AGRICULTURE; FORESTRY; ANIMAL HUSBANDRY; HUNTING; TRAPPING; FISHING
- A01M—CATCHING, TRAPPING OR SCARING OF ANIMALS; APPARATUS FOR THE DESTRUCTION OF NOXIOUS ANIMALS OR NOXIOUS PLANTS
- A01M29/00—Scaring or repelling devices, e.g. bird-scaring apparatus
- A01M29/16—Scaring or repelling devices, e.g. bird-scaring apparatus using sound waves
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A01—AGRICULTURE; FORESTRY; ANIMAL HUSBANDRY; HUNTING; TRAPPING; FISHING
- A01M—CATCHING, TRAPPING OR SCARING OF ANIMALS; APPARATUS FOR THE DESTRUCTION OF NOXIOUS ANIMALS OR NOXIOUS PLANTS
- A01M29/00—Scaring or repelling devices, e.g. bird-scaring apparatus
- A01M29/06—Scaring or repelling devices, e.g. bird-scaring apparatus using visual means, e.g. scarecrows, moving elements, specific shapes, patterns or the like
Definitions
- a predator and one or more trigger points are disposed on a cable to which motion is imparted by a motor.
- a control mechanism controls movement of the cable and has a plurality of sensors to sense the trigger points, thus controlling the motor.
- a first sensor stops the motor and reverses direction of the cable to bring the predator to a base location, a second sensor stops the motor when the predator reaches the base location, and a third sensor restarts the motor.
- the apparatus can be controlled remotely, including over the Internet, which include reprogramming and troubleshooting capabilities.
- FIG. 1 depicts a wildlife control apparatus according to an illustrative embodiment of the invention.
- FIG. 2 depicts a predator according to an illustrative embodiment of the invention.
- FIG. 3 depicts a control mechanism according to an illustrative embodiment of the invention.
- FIG. 4 depicts a second view of the control mechanism of FIG. 3 according to an illustrative embodiment of the invention.
- FIG. 5 depicts an Internet control system according to an illustrative embodiment of the invention.
- Illustrative embodiments of the present invention include a method and apparatus to rid areas of unwanted wildlife.
- FIG. 1 depicts a wildlife control apparatus 100 according to an illustrative embodiment of the invention.
- a control box 102 houses an electronic control panel, sensors and pulleys and/or wheels that control and guide predator 104 across an area.
- FIG. 2 depicts an illustrative predator.
- An illustrative attachment line 126 connects predator 104 to cable 106 .
- Predator 104 mimics a predator of the unwanted wildlife and scares the unwanted wildlife from the area.
- the apparatus may include a sound mechanism to mimic auditory characteristics of the predator.
- the “predator” does not necessarily need to be a replica of a predator but can be any object if its movement and/or the sound generated by the system keeps unwanted wildlife from the vicinity.
- the term “predator” will be used herein to encompass all objects that can be used in this manner. It is likely, however, that predator forms most closely resembling the actual predators will be the most effective.
- cable 106 runs through control box 102 .
- Cable 106 is suspended by posts 120 and 122 . Additional posts can be incorporated as needed for sufficient support.
- the term “post” is used herein in a broad sense and can include, for example, natural existing structures, such as trees and rock formations, and man-made structures, such as buildings and bridges.
- Cable 106 is preferably a synthetic rope, but may comprise any material or combination of materials formed into a rope, cable, wire, etc. that is suitable for the application and environment. Cable 106 forms a loop that wraps around wheels within control box 102 and passes through pulleys 108 , 110 and 112 so predator 104 can be drawn across a field below and into and out of a house 114 (base location).
- FIGS. 3 and 4 depict two views of a control mechanism according to an illustrative embodiment of the invention.
- Control box 102 has three sensors 130 , 132 , 134 that detect three trigger points 116 , 118 , 120 on cable 106 (see FIG. 1 ).
- Trigger points 116 , 118 , 120 can be made detectable by wrapping those areas with muffler tape or the like, or anything that can trigger the sensors electrically, magnetically, optically, mechanically, etc.
- Trigger points 116 , 118 , 120 are shown in what would be considered an exaggerated manner for most trigger point components. In most instances it is advantageous to have the trigger points of cable 106 of similar dimensions to the remainder of the cable to facilitate cable 106 passing through pulleys and control box components.
- point 116 triggers a first sensor, which stops the motor and reverses its direction to bring predator 104 back to base location 114 .
- Base location 114 need not be enclosed. It is noted that stopping may only be instantaneous such that the cable movement can be reversed.
- point 118 triggers a second sensor which causes cable 106 to slow to a stop.
- the predator is designed to turn around. This is accomplished by weighting the form in a particular manner.
- the predator is a falcon.
- the falcon's head portion is heavier than portions of the predator spanning the side opposite the center of gravity. Accordingly, predator 104 appears to back into house 114 .
- a third sensor in control box 102 is then triggered by point 120 , which causes the motor to turn on again after a designated time delay sending predator 104 for another pass across the field.
- An illustrative embodiment of the invention includes a sound device such as a chip that is triggered to activate when the predator is actively moving outside of its house.
- the sound may also be continuous or timed to be activated and need not only be activated when the predator is outside of the base location.
- a solar powered device is used to control the sound mechanism. When the predator is outside its house, sunlight will charge a lithium battery associated with the device and turn it on. Other chargeable batteries are within the scope of the invention.
- the sensors are controlled by the computer in the control box, a stepper motor is necessary.
- the sensors themselves can be programmable, in which case other motor types can be used.
- control mechanism will be used to encompass a group of control components, whether they are housed in a single enclosure, more than one separate enclosure or if partially enclosed or not enclosed.
- Predator 104 need not be moved at a significant elevation over the ground.
- An elevated form is appropriate for a bird, but a predator may also be a non-flying animal that would more appropriately be guided on or closer to the ground.
- FIG. 5 is a schematic of a system controllable via the Internet according to an illustrative embodiment of the invention.
- Wildlife control apparatus 100 sends information or data via the Internet 150 to a user 160 .
- user 160 interacts with wildlife control system 100 via a server and client such as a computer or other communication or computational device, or a single component functioning as both a client and server.
- the client/server can be any hardware device that provides access to files and services.
- the client/server may include some or all of the following: one or more processors, one or more memory devices, such as a main memory and a read only memory (ROM), a storage device, an input device an output device, and a communication interface, and a bus.
- the client/server is attached to the network by some type of an interface.
- Remote capabilities can allow long distance control, reprogramming and trouble shooting.
- the control panel may be remote from the remaining components of the apparatus and operate wirelessly.
- a remote control panel can operate one or more wildlife control mechanisms. It is noted that basic remote control capabilities can be provided that do not involve the Internet, for example to remotely activate and deactivate the system, or change various parameters.
- the apparatus is unique in that it is not a stationary device and includes a novel control mechanism not previously applied to wildlife deterrent mechanisms. While the invention has been described by illustrative embodiments, additional advantages and modifications will occur to those skilled in the art. Therefore, the invention in its broader aspects is not limited to specific details shown and described herein. Modifications, for example, to the type of object or predator, specific configuration of the components or application of the apparatus, may be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention. Accordingly, it is intended that the invention not be limited to the specific illustrative embodiments, but be interpreted within the full spirit and scope of the appended claims and their equivalents.
Abstract
A wildlife control apparatus having a predator and one or more trigger points disposed on a cable. A control mechanism controls movement of the cable and has a plurality of sensors to sense the one or more trigger points, and a motor to impart movement to the cable. A first sensor stops the motor and reverses direction of the cable to bring the predator to a base location, a second sensor stops the motor when the predator reaches the base location, and a third sensor restarts the motor.
Description
- This application is based on, and claims priority to, U.S. provisional application Ser. No. 60/823,688, filed Aug. 28, 2006, and entitled Wildlife Control Apparatus.
- Many places, including rural and urban areas, have unwanted wildlife. Farms in particular are plagued by birds and other animals that ravage crops. Farmers must be cautious not to violate any laws protecting animals and their natural habitat in their endeavor to limit the damage inflicted by unwanted wildlife. Other effects on the environment must also be considered.
- The presence of unwanted animals has been reduced in many ways, including using poisons, live predators such as cats, and animal deterrent scents. Each of these methods is either not effective enough or has other limitations or problems. Accordingly, a need exists for an effective wildlife control device that does not have some of the negative characteristics that other methods have, such as use of poisons.
- Various embodiments of a wildlife control apparatus are disclosed. A predator and one or more trigger points are disposed on a cable to which motion is imparted by a motor. A control mechanism controls movement of the cable and has a plurality of sensors to sense the trigger points, thus controlling the motor. A first sensor stops the motor and reverses direction of the cable to bring the predator to a base location, a second sensor stops the motor when the predator reaches the base location, and a third sensor restarts the motor. The apparatus can be controlled remotely, including over the Internet, which include reprogramming and troubleshooting capabilities.
- The invention is best understood from the following detailed description when read with the accompanying drawings.
-
FIG. 1 depicts a wildlife control apparatus according to an illustrative embodiment of the invention. -
FIG. 2 depicts a predator according to an illustrative embodiment of the invention. -
FIG. 3 depicts a control mechanism according to an illustrative embodiment of the invention. -
FIG. 4 depicts a second view of the control mechanism ofFIG. 3 according to an illustrative embodiment of the invention. -
FIG. 5 depicts an Internet control system according to an illustrative embodiment of the invention. - Illustrative embodiments of the present invention include a method and apparatus to rid areas of unwanted wildlife.
-
FIG. 1 depicts awildlife control apparatus 100 according to an illustrative embodiment of the invention. Acontrol box 102 houses an electronic control panel, sensors and pulleys and/or wheels that control and guidepredator 104 across an area. -
FIG. 2 depicts an illustrative predator. Anillustrative attachment line 126 connectspredator 104 tocable 106. Predator 104 mimics a predator of the unwanted wildlife and scares the unwanted wildlife from the area. In addition to the appearance of the predator form, the apparatus may include a sound mechanism to mimic auditory characteristics of the predator. The “predator” does not necessarily need to be a replica of a predator but can be any object if its movement and/or the sound generated by the system keeps unwanted wildlife from the vicinity. The term “predator” will be used herein to encompass all objects that can be used in this manner. It is likely, however, that predator forms most closely resembling the actual predators will be the most effective. - Turning back to
FIG. 1 ,cable 106 runs throughcontrol box 102. Cable 106 is suspended byposts Cable 106 is preferably a synthetic rope, but may comprise any material or combination of materials formed into a rope, cable, wire, etc. that is suitable for the application and environment.Cable 106 forms a loop that wraps around wheels withincontrol box 102 and passes throughpulleys predator 104 can be drawn across a field below and into and out of a house 114 (base location). -
FIGS. 3 and 4 depict two views of a control mechanism according to an illustrative embodiment of the invention.Control box 102 has threesensors trigger points FIG. 1 ).Trigger points Trigger points cable 106 of similar dimensions to the remainder of the cable to facilitatecable 106 passing through pulleys and control box components. Ascable 106 moves throughcontrol box 102 movingpredator 104 across the field,point 116 triggers a first sensor, which stops the motor and reverses its direction to bringpredator 104 back tobase location 114.Base location 114 need not be enclosed. It is noted that stopping may only be instantaneous such that the cable movement can be reversed. Aspredator 104 approachesbase location 114,point 118 triggers a second sensor which causescable 106 to slow to a stop. Aspredator 104 slows, it is designed to turn around. This is accomplished by weighting the form in a particular manner. For example, in one embodiment of the invention, the predator is a falcon. The falcon's head portion is heavier than portions of the predator spanning the side opposite the center of gravity. Accordingly,predator 104 appears to back intohouse 114. A third sensor incontrol box 102 is then triggered bypoint 120, which causes the motor to turn on again after a designated timedelay sending predator 104 for another pass across the field. - An illustrative embodiment of the invention includes a sound device such as a chip that is triggered to activate when the predator is actively moving outside of its house. The sound may also be continuous or timed to be activated and need not only be activated when the predator is outside of the base location. In a particular embodiment of the invention, a solar powered device is used to control the sound mechanism. When the predator is outside its house, sunlight will charge a lithium battery associated with the device and turn it on. Other chargeable batteries are within the scope of the invention.
- If the sensors are controlled by the computer in the control box, a stepper motor is necessary. Alternatively, the sensors themselves can be programmable, in which case other motor types can be used.
- Although the embodiment depicted in
FIG. 1 has the computer controls, sensors and wheels incontrol box 102, some of the components can be housed in separate boxes. The term “control mechanism” will be used to encompass a group of control components, whether they are housed in a single enclosure, more than one separate enclosure or if partially enclosed or not enclosed. - Predator 104 need not be moved at a significant elevation over the ground. An elevated form is appropriate for a bird, but a predator may also be a non-flying animal that would more appropriately be guided on or closer to the ground.
- The control mechanism may include remote controlling capabilities.
FIG. 5 is a schematic of a system controllable via the Internet according to an illustrative embodiment of the invention.Wildlife control apparatus 100 sends information or data via theInternet 150 to auser 160. - In an illustrative embodiment of the invention,
user 160 interacts withwildlife control system 100 via a server and client such as a computer or other communication or computational device, or a single component functioning as both a client and server. The client/server can be any hardware device that provides access to files and services. The client/server may include some or all of the following: one or more processors, one or more memory devices, such as a main memory and a read only memory (ROM), a storage device, an input device an output device, and a communication interface, and a bus. The client/server is attached to the network by some type of an interface. - Remote capabilities can allow long distance control, reprogramming and trouble shooting. The control panel may be remote from the remaining components of the apparatus and operate wirelessly. A remote control panel can operate one or more wildlife control mechanisms. It is noted that basic remote control capabilities can be provided that do not involve the Internet, for example to remotely activate and deactivate the system, or change various parameters.
- The apparatus is unique in that it is not a stationary device and includes a novel control mechanism not previously applied to wildlife deterrent mechanisms. While the invention has been described by illustrative embodiments, additional advantages and modifications will occur to those skilled in the art. Therefore, the invention in its broader aspects is not limited to specific details shown and described herein. Modifications, for example, to the type of object or predator, specific configuration of the components or application of the apparatus, may be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention. Accordingly, it is intended that the invention not be limited to the specific illustrative embodiments, but be interpreted within the full spirit and scope of the appended claims and their equivalents.
Claims (12)
1. A wildlife control apparatus comprising:
a predator disposed on a cable;
one or more trigger points disposed on the cable;
a control mechanism to control movement of the cable, the control mechanism comprising a plurality of sensors to sense the one or more trigger points, and a motor to impart movement to the cable, wherein the sensors are functionally connected to the motor;
wherein a first sensor of the plurality of sensors stops the motor and reverses direction of the cable to bring the predator to a base location;
wherein a second sensor of the plurality of sensors stops the motor when the predator reaches the base location; and
wherein a third sensor of the plurality of sensors restarts the motor.
2. The apparatus of claim 1 wherein the second sensor slows the motor before stopping it.
3. The apparatus of claim 1 wherein the predator is weighted in a manner that causes it to turn around when slowed or stopped.
4. The apparatus of claim 1 further comprising a sound device.
5. The apparatus of claim 4 wherein the sound device is solar powered.
6. The apparatus of claim 1 wherein the motor is solar powered.
7. The apparatus of claim 1 wherein one or more of the plurality of sensors is programmable.
8. The apparatus of claim 1 configured to be controlled remotely.
9. The apparatus of claim 8 remotely controlled via the Internet.
10. The apparatus of claim 9 comprising remote trouble shooting capabilities via the Internet.
11. The apparatus of claim 9 comprising reprogramming capabilities via the Internet.
12. A method comprising:
providing a wildlife control mechanism according to claim 1 ;
locating the wildlife control mechanism apparatus in an area where it is desired to control wildlife; and
operating the wildlife control mechanism.
Priority Applications (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US11/845,245 US20080047191A1 (en) | 2006-08-28 | 2007-08-27 | Wildlife control apparatus |
US12/472,975 US7814857B2 (en) | 2006-08-28 | 2009-05-27 | Cable control apparatus |
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US82368806P | 2006-08-28 | 2006-08-28 | |
US11/845,245 US20080047191A1 (en) | 2006-08-28 | 2007-08-27 | Wildlife control apparatus |
Related Child Applications (2)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US11/845,248 Continuation-In-Part US20080047782A1 (en) | 2006-08-28 | 2007-08-27 | Cable control apparatus |
US11/845,248 Continuation US20080047782A1 (en) | 2006-08-28 | 2007-08-27 | Cable control apparatus |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
US20080047191A1 true US20080047191A1 (en) | 2008-02-28 |
Family
ID=39136748
Family Applications (3)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US11/845,245 Abandoned US20080047191A1 (en) | 2006-08-28 | 2007-08-27 | Wildlife control apparatus |
US11/845,248 Abandoned US20080047782A1 (en) | 2006-08-28 | 2007-08-27 | Cable control apparatus |
US12/472,975 Active US7814857B2 (en) | 2006-08-28 | 2009-05-27 | Cable control apparatus |
Family Applications After (2)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US11/845,248 Abandoned US20080047782A1 (en) | 2006-08-28 | 2007-08-27 | Cable control apparatus |
US12/472,975 Active US7814857B2 (en) | 2006-08-28 | 2009-05-27 | Cable control apparatus |
Country Status (2)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (3) | US20080047191A1 (en) |
WO (1) | WO2008027818A2 (en) |
Cited By (6)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20070137883A1 (en) * | 2003-12-23 | 2007-06-21 | Sopragasen Naidoo | Bird deterring device and related clamping means |
US20080178791A1 (en) * | 2007-01-16 | 2008-07-31 | Sullivan Mews | Bird or animal repellent system |
US20090321695A1 (en) * | 2006-08-28 | 2009-12-31 | Joseph Patrick Hally | Cable control apparatus |
US20140033596A1 (en) * | 2012-07-31 | 2014-02-06 | Jeffrey Joseph Schukow | Automated migratory bird abatement unit |
US8869732B1 (en) * | 2009-06-02 | 2014-10-28 | Ab Hammarprodukter | Bird diverter |
KR20190001702U (en) * | 2017-12-27 | 2019-07-05 | 이주영 | Automatic moving multi-function harmful birds and wildlife extermination device |
Families Citing this family (5)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN102316947A (en) * | 2009-02-12 | 2012-01-11 | W·J·基钦 | Suspended cable amusement ride |
WO2013036020A2 (en) * | 2011-09-09 | 2013-03-14 | Kim Seon Ung | Apparatus for repelling harmful animals using wired movement of replicas |
US20130104443A1 (en) * | 2011-10-31 | 2013-05-02 | Marty Cramer | Decoy apparatus |
US10010069B2 (en) * | 2015-11-01 | 2018-07-03 | Billy Mitchell Denson | Bird motion simulator decoy system |
US10609920B2 (en) * | 2016-04-19 | 2020-04-07 | Shannon Smith | System and method for operating animal decoys to simulate the movement of animals |
Citations (16)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US2357900A (en) * | 1943-08-03 | 1944-09-12 | Lenhardt Alexander | Scarecrow for gardens and the like |
US2731937A (en) * | 1956-01-24 | Audible alarm assembly | ||
US2788762A (en) * | 1954-06-04 | 1957-04-16 | James A Wright | Apparatus for frightening birds |
US4109605A (en) * | 1976-08-18 | 1978-08-29 | Baechli Emil | Scarecrow system |
US4910500A (en) * | 1989-01-10 | 1990-03-20 | Carr Jay R | Electronic cattle group system |
US5956880A (en) * | 1996-02-20 | 1999-09-28 | Bird Stopper Co., Ltd. | Bird repellent apparatus |
US5977866A (en) * | 1997-02-03 | 1999-11-02 | Joseph, Jr.; John Barthell | Bird dispersing system |
US6285630B1 (en) * | 2000-03-27 | 2001-09-04 | Te-Chin Jan | Auto-control bird-expelling device |
US6357159B1 (en) * | 1997-11-17 | 2002-03-19 | Patrick Bowling | Decoy apparatus for attracting animals |
US20040035351A1 (en) * | 2002-08-22 | 2004-02-26 | Douglas Keithly | Bird deterring apparatus |
US6742471B2 (en) * | 2002-07-24 | 2004-06-01 | Walter A. Laidler | Installation for repelling birds |
US20040255837A1 (en) * | 2003-06-17 | 2004-12-23 | Bruce Donoho | Bird deterrent |
US6907688B2 (en) * | 2002-12-09 | 2005-06-21 | George W. Brint | Flying and simulated wounded mechanical bird decoys and method |
US20070221115A1 (en) * | 2006-03-21 | 2007-09-27 | Pollard Getty D | Sustainable wildlife deterrent method and apparatus |
US20080178791A1 (en) * | 2007-01-16 | 2008-07-31 | Sullivan Mews | Bird or animal repellent system |
US20080210153A1 (en) * | 2006-09-28 | 2008-09-04 | Alvarado Donald T | System and method for startling animals |
Family Cites Families (11)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US6622634B2 (en) * | 2001-10-10 | 2003-09-23 | Eric Scott Cylvick | Amusement ride employing a suspended tensioned static cable |
US20060288901A1 (en) * | 2005-06-28 | 2006-12-28 | Cylvick Eric S | Amusement ride employing a suspended tensioned static cable |
US7637213B2 (en) * | 2005-06-28 | 2009-12-29 | Cylvick Eric S | Universal brake assembly |
US7966940B2 (en) * | 2005-06-28 | 2011-06-28 | Zipholdings, Llc. | Load-minimizing, trolley arrester apparatus and method |
WO2008027818A2 (en) | 2006-08-28 | 2008-03-06 | Hally Joseph P | Cable control apparatus |
US20090272020A1 (en) * | 2007-03-15 | 2009-11-05 | Bill Robert G | Bobbing waterfowl decoy |
US7963064B2 (en) * | 2007-09-14 | 2011-06-21 | Charles Smith | Assembly and method for moving decoys |
US7975422B2 (en) * | 2007-10-01 | 2011-07-12 | Elliott Tool Company | Waterfowl decoy motion system |
US8484883B2 (en) * | 2008-04-17 | 2013-07-16 | Expedite International, Inc. | Decoy motion technology |
US20100011650A1 (en) * | 2008-07-15 | 2010-01-21 | Leonards Sr Bryan G | Waterfowl decoy with retractable anchor and anchor line |
US7975423B2 (en) * | 2008-09-22 | 2011-07-12 | Everwind Decoys, Inc. | Decoy |
-
2007
- 2007-08-27 WO PCT/US2007/076857 patent/WO2008027818A2/en active Application Filing
- 2007-08-27 US US11/845,245 patent/US20080047191A1/en not_active Abandoned
- 2007-08-27 US US11/845,248 patent/US20080047782A1/en not_active Abandoned
-
2009
- 2009-05-27 US US12/472,975 patent/US7814857B2/en active Active
Patent Citations (17)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US2731937A (en) * | 1956-01-24 | Audible alarm assembly | ||
US2357900A (en) * | 1943-08-03 | 1944-09-12 | Lenhardt Alexander | Scarecrow for gardens and the like |
US2788762A (en) * | 1954-06-04 | 1957-04-16 | James A Wright | Apparatus for frightening birds |
US4109605A (en) * | 1976-08-18 | 1978-08-29 | Baechli Emil | Scarecrow system |
US4910500A (en) * | 1989-01-10 | 1990-03-20 | Carr Jay R | Electronic cattle group system |
US5956880A (en) * | 1996-02-20 | 1999-09-28 | Bird Stopper Co., Ltd. | Bird repellent apparatus |
US5977866A (en) * | 1997-02-03 | 1999-11-02 | Joseph, Jr.; John Barthell | Bird dispersing system |
US6357159B1 (en) * | 1997-11-17 | 2002-03-19 | Patrick Bowling | Decoy apparatus for attracting animals |
US6285630B1 (en) * | 2000-03-27 | 2001-09-04 | Te-Chin Jan | Auto-control bird-expelling device |
US6742471B2 (en) * | 2002-07-24 | 2004-06-01 | Walter A. Laidler | Installation for repelling birds |
US20040035351A1 (en) * | 2002-08-22 | 2004-02-26 | Douglas Keithly | Bird deterring apparatus |
US6742470B2 (en) * | 2002-08-22 | 2004-06-01 | Douglas Keithly | Bird deterring apparatus |
US6907688B2 (en) * | 2002-12-09 | 2005-06-21 | George W. Brint | Flying and simulated wounded mechanical bird decoys and method |
US20040255837A1 (en) * | 2003-06-17 | 2004-12-23 | Bruce Donoho | Bird deterrent |
US20070221115A1 (en) * | 2006-03-21 | 2007-09-27 | Pollard Getty D | Sustainable wildlife deterrent method and apparatus |
US20080210153A1 (en) * | 2006-09-28 | 2008-09-04 | Alvarado Donald T | System and method for startling animals |
US20080178791A1 (en) * | 2007-01-16 | 2008-07-31 | Sullivan Mews | Bird or animal repellent system |
Cited By (10)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20070137883A1 (en) * | 2003-12-23 | 2007-06-21 | Sopragasen Naidoo | Bird deterring device and related clamping means |
US20090321695A1 (en) * | 2006-08-28 | 2009-12-31 | Joseph Patrick Hally | Cable control apparatus |
US7814857B2 (en) | 2006-08-28 | 2010-10-19 | Joseph Patrick Hally | Cable control apparatus |
US20080178791A1 (en) * | 2007-01-16 | 2008-07-31 | Sullivan Mews | Bird or animal repellent system |
US7654217B2 (en) * | 2007-01-16 | 2010-02-02 | Sullivan Mews Llc | Bird or animal repellent system |
US20100058974A1 (en) * | 2007-01-16 | 2010-03-11 | Sullivan Mews Llc | Bird or animal repellent system |
US8869732B1 (en) * | 2009-06-02 | 2014-10-28 | Ab Hammarprodukter | Bird diverter |
US20140033596A1 (en) * | 2012-07-31 | 2014-02-06 | Jeffrey Joseph Schukow | Automated migratory bird abatement unit |
KR20190001702U (en) * | 2017-12-27 | 2019-07-05 | 이주영 | Automatic moving multi-function harmful birds and wildlife extermination device |
KR200494293Y1 (en) | 2017-12-27 | 2021-09-08 | 이주영 | Multifunction of Automatic movement method Harmful birds and wild animals deferent devices |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
WO2008027818A3 (en) | 2008-08-21 |
WO2008027818A2 (en) | 2008-03-06 |
US7814857B2 (en) | 2010-10-19 |
US20080047782A1 (en) | 2008-02-28 |
US20090321695A1 (en) | 2009-12-31 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US20080047191A1 (en) | Wildlife control apparatus | |
Jachowski et al. | Good virtual fences make good neighbors: opportunities for conservation | |
US20090205245A1 (en) | Trapping system utilizing attractants | |
KR20200096747A (en) | Harmful wildlife eradicating equipment | |
Hogsette et al. | Improved capture of stable flies (Diptera: Muscidae) by placement of knight stick sticky fly traps protected by electric fence inside animal exhibit yards at the Smithsonian's National Zoological Park | |
JP7182051B2 (en) | Bird repellent device | |
Mapari et al. | Agriculture protection from animals using smart scarecrow system | |
Goldthwaite et al. | Evolutionary dissipation of an antisnake system: differential behavior by California and Arctic ground squirrels in above-and below-ground contexts | |
CN106172358A (en) | Drive the method for birds, server and information collecting device | |
Schwarzkopf et al. | Acoustic attractants enhance trapping success for cane toads | |
JP6183734B1 (en) | Method and structure for preventing flight of harmful birds such as starlings and sparrows | |
Bakaloudis | Hunting strategies and foraging performance of the short‐toed eagle in the Dadia‐Lefkimi‐Soufli National Park, north‐east Greece | |
BayrakÇi et al. | Current status of the western gray squirrel population in the Puget Trough, Washington | |
JP7268957B2 (en) | Vibration generator and vibration generation system | |
US11557142B1 (en) | Home wildlife deterrence | |
CA3216822A1 (en) | Pest management system | |
Andres et al. | Development of Modulated Audible Frequency and Electric Shock Repellent for Rock Dove and Pigeon with Monitoring System | |
Sheela et al. | Design of Rat Trap based on Ultrasonic Waves using Bluetooth Technology | |
Owens et al. | Automated broadcast of a predator call did not reduce predation pressure by Sugar Gliders on birds | |
Hildreth et al. | Deer-activated bioacoustic frightening device deters white-tailed deer | |
Lunneryd et al. | Detection of leader net by whitefish Coregonus lavaretus during varying environmental conditions | |
Minoshma et al. | An Efficient and Smart Animal Repulsion Technology using Laser Sensors and Acoustic Signals | |
Phetyawa et al. | Application and Challenges of an IoT Bird Repeller System As a result of Bird Behavior | |
ONeil | Reducing bat fatalities using ultrasonic acoustic deterrent technology: a potential mechanism for conservation at offshore wind energy sites | |
Abdulla et al. | Bird Hazard Mitigation System (BHMS): review, design, and implementation |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
STCB | Information on status: application discontinuation |
Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION |