US20080168535A1 - Systems and methods for site access - Google Patents
Systems and methods for site access Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- US20080168535A1 US20080168535A1 US11/965,547 US96554707A US2008168535A1 US 20080168535 A1 US20080168535 A1 US 20080168535A1 US 96554707 A US96554707 A US 96554707A US 2008168535 A1 US2008168535 A1 US 2008168535A1
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- content
- permissible
- access
- computer
- client
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Abandoned
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
- H04L67/00—Network arrangements or protocols for supporting network services or applications
- H04L67/50—Network services
- H04L67/53—Network services using third party service providers
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F16/00—Information retrieval; Database structures therefor; File system structures therefor
- G06F16/90—Details of database functions independent of the retrieved data types
- G06F16/95—Retrieval from the web
- G06F16/953—Querying, e.g. by the use of web search engines
- G06F16/9535—Search customisation based on user profiles and personalisation
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
- H04L63/00—Network architectures or network communication protocols for network security
- H04L63/10—Network architectures or network communication protocols for network security for controlling access to devices or network resources
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
- H04L63/00—Network architectures or network communication protocols for network security
- H04L63/14—Network architectures or network communication protocols for network security for detecting or protecting against malicious traffic
- H04L63/1408—Network architectures or network communication protocols for network security for detecting or protecting against malicious traffic by monitoring network traffic
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
- H04L67/00—Network arrangements or protocols for supporting network services or applications
- H04L67/01—Protocols
- H04L67/02—Protocols based on web technology, e.g. hypertext transfer protocol [HTTP]
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
- H04L9/00—Cryptographic mechanisms or cryptographic arrangements for secret or secure communications; Network security protocols
- H04L9/40—Network security protocols
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
- H04L69/00—Network arrangements, protocols or services independent of the application payload and not provided for in the other groups of this subclass
- H04L69/30—Definitions, standards or architectural aspects of layered protocol stacks
- H04L69/32—Architecture of open systems interconnection [OSI] 7-layer type protocol stacks, e.g. the interfaces between the data link level and the physical level
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
- H04L69/00—Network arrangements, protocols or services independent of the application payload and not provided for in the other groups of this subclass
- H04L69/30—Definitions, standards or architectural aspects of layered protocol stacks
- H04L69/32—Architecture of open systems interconnection [OSI] 7-layer type protocol stacks, e.g. the interfaces between the data link level and the physical level
- H04L69/322—Intralayer communication protocols among peer entities or protocol data unit [PDU] definitions
- H04L69/329—Intralayer communication protocols among peer entities or protocol data unit [PDU] definitions in the application layer [OSI layer 7]
Definitions
- This invention relates generally to monitoring access by a client to a plurality of sites, and more particularly to such monitoring via an intervening control layer within the client.
- a school or parent may desire that children only be able to access a limited number of sites that are known not to contain material believed not suitable for children.
- an employer may only want its employees to access information from sites that are believed to be relevant to the employees' jobs, and not the entire Internet.
- ISP Internet Service Provider
- a user To connect to the Internet, a user must have an account with an ISP, through which the user accesses content on the Internet. The ISP thus can limit the content to which the user has access. This approach is also easily circumvented, however. The user may merely connect to the Internet using an account with a different ISP, which allows complete access to the entire Internet, including objectionable content.
- a computerized system includes a plurality of sites, a monitoring server, and a client.
- Each site has content referenced be addresses.
- the monitoring server maintains a database of permissible content on at least one of the plurality of sites, where the permissible content is also referenced by addresses.
- the client has an intervening control layer within an otherwise standard mechanism by which programs running on the client access the content on the plurality of sites. The intervening control layer polls the monitoring server to determine whether a program attempting to access content on one of the sites as referenced by an address should be permitted to do so.
- the plurality of sites are Internet world-wide-web sites, and the monitoring server and the client are also communicatively coupled via the Internet.
- content is referenced via a Universal Resource Locator (URL), and the otherwise standard mechanism of the client includes a socket services program and a TCP/IP handler program, such that the intervening control layer resides between the two.
- URL Universal Resource Locator
- the otherwise standard mechanism of the client includes a socket services program and a TCP/IP handler program, such that the intervening control layer resides between the two.
- any sort of program accessing the Internet must go through the socket services program and the TCP/IP handler program, and also the intervening control layer.
- monitoring access to the Internet is not contingent on the browser program being run on the client.
- Any browser program Mocrosoft Internet Explorer, Netscape Navigator, or a different browser program—must go through the socket services program (e.g., WinSock), and the TCP/IP handler program (e.g., the TCP/IP stack), such that the intervening control layer may intercept URL addresses, and via a call to the monitoring server, determine whether they access should be permitted thereto.
- socket services program e.g., WinSock
- TCP/IP handler program e.g., the TCP/IP stack
- monitoring access to the Internet is also not contingent on the Internet Service Provider (ISP) through which the Internet is accessed.
- ISP Internet Service Provider
- access at the client must go through the socket services program, the TCP/IP handler program, and thus the intervening control layer, so that URL address may be intercepted, and via a call to the monitoring server, deemed to be permissible or not.
- FIG. 1 is a diagram of a computer in conjunction with which embodiments of the invention may be implemented;
- FIG. 2( a ) is a diagram of a computerized system in accordance with one embodiment of the invention.
- FIG. 2( b ) is a diagram of a computerized system in accordance with another embodiment of the invention.
- FIG. 3 is a diagram of a computerized method in accordance with one embodiment of the invention.
- Computer 110 is operatively coupled to display device 112 , pointing device 114 , and keyboard 116 .
- Computer 110 includes a processor (preferably, an Intel Pentium processor), random-access memory (RAM) (preferably, at least thirty-two megabytes), read-only memory (ROM), and one or more storage devices, such as a hard disk drive, a floppy disk drive (into which a floppy disk can be inserted), an optical disk drive, and a tape cartridge drive.
- RAM random-access memory
- ROM read-only memory
- storage devices such as a hard disk drive, a floppy disk drive (into which a floppy disk can be inserted), an optical disk drive, and a tape cartridge drive.
- the memory, hard drives, floppy disks, etc. are types of computer-readable media.
- the hard drives and floppy disks are also types of non-volatile storage media.
- the invention is not particularly limited to any type of computer 110 .
- Computer 110 preferably is a PC-compatible computer or a MacOS-compatible computer. The construction and operation of such computers are well known within the art.
- computer 110 may be communicatively connected to the Internet via a communication device, any particular manner by which the invention is not limited to, and which is not shown in FIG. 1 .
- Internet connectivity is well known within the art.
- the computer includes a communication device that is a modem and corresponding communication drivers to connect to the Internet via what is known in the art as a “dial-up connection.”
- the computer includes a communication device that is an Ethernet or similar hardware (network) card to connect to a local-area network (LAN) that itself is connected to the Internet via what is know in the art as a “direct connection” (e.g., T1 line, etc.).
- LAN local-area network
- Computer 110 also has at least one operating environment running thereon, each desirably providing a graphical user interface including a user-controllable pointer.
- Such operating environments include operating systems such as versions of the Microsoft Windows and Apple MacOS operating systems known in the art. The invention is not limited to any particular operating environment, however, and the construction and use of such operating environments are well known within the art.
- Computer 110 also desirably has at least one web browser application program running with the at least one operating environment, to permit users of computer 110 to access Internet world-wide-web pages as addressed by Universal Resource Locator (URL) addresses.
- URL Universal Resource Locator
- Such browser application programs include Netscape Navigator and Microsoft Internet Explorer.
- the invention is amenable for implementation on any type of computer—e.g., a computer running Microsoft Windows, a computer running Apple MacOS, etc.
- the embodiments described herein largely pertain to a computer running Microsoft Windows; this should not be taken as a limitation as to the invention only pertaining to Microsoft Windows.
- WinSock is specific to Microsoft Windows
- Open Transport would be the corresponding mechanism utilized in Apple MacOS.
- Display device 112 permits the display of information, including computer, video and other information, for viewing by a user of the computer.
- the invention is not limited to any particular display device 112 .
- Such display devices include cathode ray tube (CRT) displays (monitors), as well as flat panel displays such as liquid crystal displays MCD's).
- Pointing device 114 permits the control of the screen pointer provided by the graphical user interface of operating systems such as versions of Microsoft Windows.
- the invention is not limited to any particular pointing device 114 .
- Such pointing devices include mouses, touch pads, trackballs, remote controls and point sticks.
- keyboard 116 permits entry of textual information into computer 110 , as known within the art, and the invention is not limited to any particular type of keyboard.
- FIG. 2( a ) a diagram of a computerized system in accordance with one embodiment of the invention is shown.
- Client computer 200 is able to access sites 202 as permitted by monitoring server 204 .
- Each of client computer 200 , sites 202 , and monitoring server 204 is communicatively coupled to one another via the Internet 206 .
- each of client computer 200 and monitoring server 204 may be a computer such as that shown in and described in conjunction with FIG. 1 , although the invention is not so limited.
- each of client computer 200 , and monitoring server 204 has a processor, a computer-readable medium from which computer programs are executed by the processor, and desirably a communications device, such as a network card, or a modem.
- the communications device provides an Internet connection for the computer.
- Monitoring server 204 and each of sites 202 desirably is or includes an Internet world-wide-web server, as known in the art, such that it has assigned thereto a Universal Resource Locator (URL) address to permit client computer 200 , as well as other computers, to access the web server.
- the invention is not particularly limited to a given type of web server. Typical examples include those running software available from Netscape, Microsoft, Apache, NCSA, and others.
- Each web server is also not limited to running on a particular operating system (OS); common operating systems including Microsoft Windows 95, Microsoft Windows NT, Apple MacOS and UNIX.
- each of sites 202 includes content referenced by URL addresses, such as multimedia content, web pages, images that are part of web pages, etc.
- the content as referenced by URL address includes a plurality of hypertext-markup-language (HTML) pages located at a site; the content may be in a particular directory on a storage device located at the site, or in one or more directories within the storage device.
- HTML hypertext-markup-language
- Client 200 includes a standard mechanism by which programs running on the client access the sites 202 through the Internet.
- the standard mechanism as shown in FIG. 2( a ) includes a socket services program 208 , such as WinSock, and a TCP/IP handler program 210 , that provides a TCP/IP stack.
- socket services program 208 such as WinSock
- TCP/IP handler program 210 that provides a TCP/IP stack.
- Intervening control layer 212 monitors information passed between socket services program 208 and TCP/IP program 210 ; when a URL address passes through, layer 212 intercepts the URL address to determine whether content at the address is permissible to be accessed. Layer 212 accomplishes this in a two-fold manner. First, layer 212 checks cache 214 to determine whether the address is listed therein. Cache 214 is a cache of addresses that were previously determined to refer to permissible content. If the address is not in cache 214 , layer 212 polls monitoring server 204 , asking monitoring server 204 if the content at the requested URL address is permissible. Layer 212 is desirably software (e.g., a computer program) running on client computer 200 . Note that layer 212 desirably does not make direct calls to TCP/IP program 210 .
- Intervening control layer 212 monitors information passed between socket services program 208 and TCP/IP program 210 ; when a URL address passes through, layer 212 intercepts the URL address to determine
- Server 204 maintains a database of permissible content (referenced by URL addresses), such as a SQL database of such content. When it receives a request from client 200 as to whether content at a given URL address is permitted to be accessed, server 204 determines whether the address is in the database, indicating that the content at this address is permissible. Server 204 desirably accomplishes this by running a computer program having this functionality. If the content is deemed permissible, layer 212 permits the requested URL address to pass through to TCP/IP program 210 , and further adds the address to cache 214 , so that subsequent permission to programs running on the client to access the content at this URL address can be given without repeated polling of server 204 . If the address is not in the database, layer 212 does not permit the requested URL address to pass through to TCP/IP program 210 , effectively denying access to the content at this URL address by the requesting program running on client 200 .
- a database of permissible content referenced by URL addresses
- server 204 determine
- permissible content is divided into two types: type 1 and type 2.
- Type 1 permissible content is any file at a given URL address. For example, if a permitted URL address is “http://www.permissible.com,” any file within any subdirectory at this URL address is permitted—“http://www.permissible.com/file.htm, http://www.permissible.com/directory1/directory2/file3.htm,” etc.
- Type 2 permissible content is any file within any subdirectory within a given directory or subdirectory at a given URL address. For example, if a permitted directory at a URL address is “http://www.permissible.com/permissible,” any file within any subdirectory within the directory “permissible” would be permissible. That is, “http://www.permissible.com/permissible/file.htm,” and “http://www.permissible.com/permissible/directory/file2.htm” would be permissible, but “http://www.permissible.com/notpermissible/file5.htm” would not be.
- type 2 permissible content includes image files, as denoted by .JPG or .GIF suffixes, so long as they reside at the same URL address, regardless of which directory or subdirectory within the URL address they reside. This exception is made because frequently all images at a web site are stored at a location separate from the web pages using those images. Inasmuch as the web pages using those images have been deemed to be permissible, it is assumed that those images are permissible as well.
- the database maintained by the server includes permissible content, such that at least some of the content includes all HTML pages located at a web site (type 1), or an incomplete portion of all the HTML pages located at the site (type 2).
- FIG. 2( b ) a diagram of a computerized system in accordance with another embodiment of the invention is shown.
- Client computer 400 is able to access sites 402 as permitted by monitoring server 404 .
- Each of client computer 400 , sites 402 , and monitoring server 404 is communicatively coupled to one another via the Internet 406 .
- each of client computer 400 and monitoring server 404 may be a computer such as that shown in and described in conjunction with FIG. 1 , although the invention is not so limited.
- each of client computer 400 , and monitoring server 404 has a processor, a computer-readable medium from which computer programs are executed by the processor, and desirably a communications device, such as a network card, or a modem.
- the communications device provides an Internet connection for the computer.
- Monitoring server 404 and each of sites 402 desirably is or includes an Internet world-wide-web server, as known in the art, such that it has assigned thereto a Universal Resource Locator (URL) address to permit client computer 400 , as well as other computers, to access the web server.
- the invention is not particularly limited to a given type of web server. Typical examples include those running software available from Netscape, Microsoft, Apple, Apache, NCSA, and others.
- Each web server is also not limited to running on a particular operating system (OS); common operating systems including Microsoft Windows 95, Microsoft Windows NT, Apple MacOS and UNIX.
- each of sites 402 includes content referenced by URL addresses, such as multimedia content, web pages, images that are part of web pages, etc.
- the content as referenced by URL address includes a plurality of hypertext-markup-language (HTML) pages located at a site; the content may be in a particular directory on a storage device located at the site, or in one or more directories within the storage device.
- HTML hypertext-markup-language
- Client 400 includes a standard mechanism by which programs running on the client access the sites 402 through the Internet.
- the standard mechanism as shown in FIG. 2( a ) includes a socket services program 408 , such as WinSock or Open Transport, that provides a service layer, and a TCP/IP handler program 410 , that provides a TCP/IP transport layer.
- socket services program 408 such as WinSock or Open Transport
- TCP/IP handler program 410 that provides a TCP/IP transport layer.
- the network layer 411 , the transport layer provided by the TCP/IP program 410 , and the service layer provided by the program 408 are all known parts of the Open Systems Interconnection (OSI) model known to those of ordinary skill in the art.
- OSI Open Systems Interconnection
- the invention adds an intervening control layer 412 between the socket services program 408 and the TCP/IP program 410 , via a hook 413 within a memory address 415 of program 408 .
- Intervening control layer 412 monitors information passed between socket services program 408 and TCP/IP program 410 ; when a URL address passes through, layer 412 intercepts the URL address to determine whether content at the address is permissible to be accessed. Layer 412 accomplishes this in a two-fold manner. First, layer 412 checks cache 414 to determine whether the address is listed therein. Cache 414 is a cache of addresses that were previously determined to refer to permissible content.
- layer 412 polls monitoring server 404 , asking monitoring server 404 if the content at the requested URL address is permissible, as represented by block 416 .
- Layer 412 is desirably software (e.g., a computer program) running on client computer 400 . Note that layer 412 desirably does not make direct calls to TCP/IP program 410 .
- Server 404 maintains a database of permissible content (referenced by URL addresses), such as a SQL database of such content. When it receives a request from client 400 as to whether content at a given URL address is permitted to be accessed, server 404 determines whether the address is in the database, indicating that the content at this address is permissible. Server 404 desirably accomplishes this by running a computer program having this functionality.
- layer 412 permits the requested URL address to pass through to TCP/IP program 410 —i.e., as represented by call 417 , such that hook 413 is bypassed—and further adds the address to cache 414 , so that subsequent permission to programs running on the client to access the content at this URL address can be given without repeated polling of server 404 . If the address is not in the database, layer 412 does not permit the requested URL address to pass through to TCP/IP program 410 , effectively denying access to the content at this URL address by the requesting program running on client 400 .
- permissible content is divided into two types: type 1 and type 2.
- Type 1 permissible content is any file at a given URL address. For example, if a permitted URL address is “http://www.permissible.com,” any file within any subdirectory at this URL address is permitted—“http://www.permissible.com/file.htm, http://www.permissible.com/directory1/directory2/file3.htm,” etc.
- Type 2 permissible content is any file within any subdirectory within a given directory or subdirectory at a given URL address. For example, if a permitted directory at a URL address is “http://www.permissible.com/permissible,” any file within any subdirectory within the directory “permissible” would be permissible. That is, “http://www.permissible.com/permissible/file.htm,” and “http://www.permissible.com/permissible/directory/file2.htm” would be permissible, but “http://www.permissible.com/notpermissiblelfile5.htm” would not be.
- type 2 permissible content includes image files, as denoted by .JPG or GIF suffixes, so long as they reside at the same URL address, regardless of which directory or subdirectory within the URL address they reside. This exception is made because frequently all images at a web site are stored at a location separate from the web pages using those images. Inasmuch as the web pages using those images have been deemed to be permissible, it is assumed that those images are permissible as well.
- the database maintained by the server includes permissible content, such that at least some of the content includes all HTML pages located at a web site (type 1), or an incomplete portion of all the HTML pages located at the site (type 2).
- the computerized system according to one embodiment of the invention shown in FIG. 2( b ) may be also described in another manner, via a min-proxy server conceptualization.
- hooking as known in the art, into memory address 415 of the service layer provided by program 408 (as represented by arrow 413 ) is accomplished.
- an application makes a call to the service layer—i.e., for specific content at a given site as referenced by an address—this call is then remapped to the intervening control layer 412 .
- the call is then processed.
- cache 414 is checked, and desirably includes configuration information. If the call is not within the cache, then the an internal process is called, as represented by block 416 .
- This internal process calls the service layer provided by program 408 itself, except that it bypasses the hook and goes to the monitoring server 404 .
- the server performs the check, returning the results to the service layer, which returns it to the process as represented by block 416 .
- the process decides whether to allow the original call (more specifically, making the original call), or return it as “access denied”. If it makes the original call, it remaps the call to the original and bypasses the hook.
- embodiments of the invention do not depend on URL address only. That is, the embodiments of the invention check the actual IP (Internet Protocol) address that is being called, and not the URL address. This assists in the invention catching circumvention attempts that use a HOSTS file that remaps any URL address to an IP address, as is known in the art. This is an advantage of the invention.
- the term address may correspond to IP address and/or URL address. (E.g., the phrase “each site having content referenced by addresses” includes either IP addresses and/or URL addresses.)
- FIG. 3 a flowchart of a computerized method according to an embodiment of the invention is shown.
- This method is inclusive of the steps or acts required to be taken by a client computer and a server computer to monitor Internet access by programs running on the client computer, in accordance with one embodiment of the invention. These steps or acts are performed in accordance with one or more computer programs, such as the intervening control layer and the server program that accesses the database stored on the server, as have been described in conjunction with FIG. 2( a ) and FIG. 2( b ).
- FIG. 3 a flowchart of a computerized method according to an embodiment of the invention is shown. This method is inclusive of the steps or acts required to be taken by a client computer and a server computer to monitor Internet access by programs running on the client computer, in accordance with one embodiment of the invention. These steps or acts are performed in accordance with one or more computer programs, such as the intervening control layer and the server program that accesses the database stored on the server, as have been described in conjunction with FIG. 2(
- the server refers to the situation where the client, the server and a plurality of sites are communicatively coupled to one another through the Internet, where the client is running a web browser program, the server is or includes a web server, and the sites are Internet world-wide-web sites maintained by web servers; however, the invention is not so limited.
- a web browser or other program running on the client requests content at a server, as referenced by a URL address.
- this URL request is received at a standard mechanism on the client by which programs running on the client access content on the plurality of sites.
- a standard mechanism may include a socket services program and a TCP/IP handler program, as has been described.
- the URL request is intercepted by an intervening layer within the standard mechanism. The intervening layer then checks a cache to determine whether the URL address is listed therein.
- step 306 the intervening control layer contacts the monitoring server.
- the monitoring server in step 306 contacts database 308 , to determine whether the URL address (viz., content addressed thereby) is in the database. If the content is not type 1 or type 2 permissible content, as has been previously described, then control proceeds from step 310 to step 312 , and the method ends with the intervening control layer denying the web browser or other program access to the content at this URL in step 312 . However, if the content is type 1 or type 2 permissible content, then control proceeds instead to step 314 , at which step the intervening control layer places the URL address in the cache.
- step 304 determines whether the requested URL address has been found in the cache, or after step 314 , once a permitted URL address (viz., content addressed thereby) has been placed in the cache.
- control proceeds to step 316 .
- step 316 the intervening control layer of the client permits the program running on the client that had accessed the URL address deemed to be permissible to access the content at this URL address.
Abstract
Monitoring site access via an intervening control layer within a client is disclosed. In one embodiment of the invention, a computerized system includes a plurality of sites, a monitoring server, and a client. Each site has content referenced be addresses. The monitoring server maintains a database of permissible content on at least one of the plurality of sites, where the permissible content is also referenced by addresses. The client has an intervening control layer within an otherwise standard mechanism by which programs running on the client access the content on the plurality of sites. The intervening control layer polls the monitoring server to determine whether a program attempting to access content on one of the sites as referenced by an address should be permitted to do so.
Description
- This is a continuation under 37 C.F.R. 1.53(b) of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 08/982,240, filed Dec. 1, 1997, which application is incorporated herein by reference.
- This invention relates generally to monitoring access by a client to a plurality of sites, and more particularly to such monitoring via an intervening control layer within the client.
- With the advent of the Internet, monitoring access to world-wide web sites has reached paramount importance. For example, a school or parent may desire that children only be able to access a limited number of sites that are known not to contain material believed not suitable for children. As another example, an employer may only want its employees to access information from sites that are believed to be relevant to the employees' jobs, and not the entire Internet.
- Prior art solutions aimed at monitoring access to world-wide web sites are not fool proof, however. One approach is to incorporate within the program by which Internet access is accomplished safeguards to prevent access to unauthorized sites. For example, versions of Netscape Navigator or Microsoft Internet Explorer may be modified such that Internet access is monitored (viz., access to certain site prohibited). However, this approach is easily circumvented by merely installing an unadulterated version of Netscape Navigator or Microsoft Internet on the computer.
- Another approach is to limit access to objectionable sites on the Internet at the Internet Service Provider (ISP) level. To connect to the Internet, a user must have an account with an ISP, through which the user accesses content on the Internet. The ISP thus can limit the content to which the user has access. This approach is also easily circumvented, however. The user may merely connect to the Internet using an account with a different ISP, which allows complete access to the entire Internet, including objectionable content.
- Therefore, there is a need for better monitoring of Internet access that is not as easily circumvented as solutions found in the prior art are.
- The above-identified shortcomings as well as other shortcomings and problems are addressed by the present invention, which will be understood by reading and studying the following specification. In one embodiment, a computerized system includes a plurality of sites, a monitoring server, and a client. Each site has content referenced be addresses. The monitoring server maintains a database of permissible content on at least one of the plurality of sites, where the permissible content is also referenced by addresses. The client has an intervening control layer within an otherwise standard mechanism by which programs running on the client access the content on the plurality of sites. The intervening control layer polls the monitoring server to determine whether a program attempting to access content on one of the sites as referenced by an address should be permitted to do so.
- More specifically, in one particular embodiment of the invention, the plurality of sites are Internet world-wide-web sites, and the monitoring server and the client are also communicatively coupled via the Internet. In this particular embodiment, content is referenced via a Universal Resource Locator (URL), and the otherwise standard mechanism of the client includes a socket services program and a TCP/IP handler program, such that the intervening control layer resides between the two. Thus, any sort of program accessing the Internet must go through the socket services program and the TCP/IP handler program, and also the intervening control layer.
- The invention thus provides for advantages not found in the prior art. With respect to the specific embodiment described above, monitoring access to the Internet is not contingent on the browser program being run on the client. Any browser program—Microsoft Internet Explorer, Netscape Navigator, or a different browser program—must go through the socket services program (e.g., WinSock), and the TCP/IP handler program (e.g., the TCP/IP stack), such that the intervening control layer may intercept URL addresses, and via a call to the monitoring server, determine whether they access should be permitted thereto.
- Furthermore, also with respect to the specific embodiment described above, monitoring access to the Internet is also not contingent on the Internet Service Provider (ISP) through which the Internet is accessed. Regardless of the ISP used, access at the client must go through the socket services program, the TCP/IP handler program, and thus the intervening control layer, so that URL address may be intercepted, and via a call to the monitoring server, deemed to be permissible or not.
- In different embodiments of the invention, computerized methods, computerized systems, computers, servers and computer-readable media of varying scope are described. Still other and further embodiments, aspects and advantages of the invention will become apparent by reference to the drawings and by reading the following detailed description.
-
FIG. 1 is a diagram of a computer in conjunction with which embodiments of the invention may be implemented; -
FIG. 2( a) is a diagram of a computerized system in accordance with one embodiment of the invention; -
FIG. 2( b) is a diagram of a computerized system in accordance with another embodiment of the invention; and, -
FIG. 3 is a diagram of a computerized method in accordance with one embodiment of the invention. - In the following detailed description of the preferred embodiments, reference is made to the accompanying drawings which form a part hereof, and in which is shown by way of illustration specific preferred embodiments in which the inventions may be practiced. These embodiments are described in sufficient detail to enable those skilled in the art to practice the invention, and it is to be understood that other embodiments may be utilized and that logical, mechanical and electrical changes may be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the present invention. The following detailed description is, therefore, not to be taken in a limiting sense, and the scope of the present invention is defined only by the appended claims.
- Referring first to
FIG. 1 , a diagram of a computer in conjunction with which embodiments of the invention may be implemented is shown.Computer 110 is operatively coupled to displaydevice 112,pointing device 114, andkeyboard 116.Computer 110 includes a processor (preferably, an Intel Pentium processor), random-access memory (RAM) (preferably, at least thirty-two megabytes), read-only memory (ROM), and one or more storage devices, such as a hard disk drive, a floppy disk drive (into which a floppy disk can be inserted), an optical disk drive, and a tape cartridge drive. The memory, hard drives, floppy disks, etc., are types of computer-readable media. The hard drives and floppy disks are also types of non-volatile storage media. The invention is not particularly limited to any type ofcomputer 110.Computer 110 preferably is a PC-compatible computer or a MacOS-compatible computer. The construction and operation of such computers are well known within the art. - Furthermore,
computer 110 may be communicatively connected to the Internet via a communication device, any particular manner by which the invention is not limited to, and which is not shown inFIG. 1 . Internet connectivity is well known within the art. In one embodiment, the computer includes a communication device that is a modem and corresponding communication drivers to connect to the Internet via what is known in the art as a “dial-up connection.” In another embodiment, the computer includes a communication device that is an Ethernet or similar hardware (network) card to connect to a local-area network (LAN) that itself is connected to the Internet via what is know in the art as a “direct connection” (e.g., T1 line, etc.). -
Computer 110 also has at least one operating environment running thereon, each desirably providing a graphical user interface including a user-controllable pointer. Such operating environments include operating systems such as versions of the Microsoft Windows and Apple MacOS operating systems known in the art. The invention is not limited to any particular operating environment, however, and the construction and use of such operating environments are well known within the art.Computer 110 also desirably has at least one web browser application program running with the at least one operating environment, to permit users ofcomputer 110 to access Internet world-wide-web pages as addressed by Universal Resource Locator (URL) addresses. Such browser application programs include Netscape Navigator and Microsoft Internet Explorer. It is noted, however, that the invention is amenable for implementation on any type of computer—e.g., a computer running Microsoft Windows, a computer running Apple MacOS, etc. The embodiments described herein largely pertain to a computer running Microsoft Windows; this should not be taken as a limitation as to the invention only pertaining to Microsoft Windows. For example, where WinSock is specific to Microsoft Windows, Open Transport would be the corresponding mechanism utilized in Apple MacOS. -
Display device 112 permits the display of information, including computer, video and other information, for viewing by a user of the computer. The invention is not limited to anyparticular display device 112. Such display devices include cathode ray tube (CRT) displays (monitors), as well as flat panel displays such as liquid crystal displays MCD's).Pointing device 114 permits the control of the screen pointer provided by the graphical user interface of operating systems such as versions of Microsoft Windows. The invention is not limited to anyparticular pointing device 114. Such pointing devices include mouses, touch pads, trackballs, remote controls and point sticks. Finally,keyboard 116 permits entry of textual information intocomputer 110, as known within the art, and the invention is not limited to any particular type of keyboard. - Referring next to
FIG. 2( a), a diagram of a computerized system in accordance with one embodiment of the invention is shown.Client computer 200 is able to accesssites 202 as permitted by monitoringserver 204. Each ofclient computer 200,sites 202, andmonitoring server 204 is communicatively coupled to one another via theInternet 206. Furthermore, each ofclient computer 200 andmonitoring server 204 may be a computer such as that shown in and described in conjunction withFIG. 1 , although the invention is not so limited. Thus, each ofclient computer 200, andmonitoring server 204 has a processor, a computer-readable medium from which computer programs are executed by the processor, and desirably a communications device, such as a network card, or a modem. The communications device provides an Internet connection for the computer. -
Monitoring server 204 and each ofsites 202 desirably is or includes an Internet world-wide-web server, as known in the art, such that it has assigned thereto a Universal Resource Locator (URL) address to permitclient computer 200, as well as other computers, to access the web server. The invention is not particularly limited to a given type of web server. Typical examples include those running software available from Netscape, Microsoft, Apache, NCSA, and others. Each web server is also not limited to running on a particular operating system (OS); common operating systems including Microsoft Windows 95, Microsoft Windows NT, Apple MacOS and UNIX. Furthermore, each ofsites 202 includes content referenced by URL addresses, such as multimedia content, web pages, images that are part of web pages, etc. More specifically, the content as referenced by URL address includes a plurality of hypertext-markup-language (HTML) pages located at a site; the content may be in a particular directory on a storage device located at the site, or in one or more directories within the storage device. -
Client 200 includes a standard mechanism by which programs running on the client access thesites 202 through the Internet. The standard mechanism as shown inFIG. 2( a) includes asocket services program 208, such as WinSock, and a TCP/IP handler program 210, that provides a TCP/IP stack. Thus, when a computer program running onclient 200 attempts to access asite 202 via a URL address, it passes this information tosocket services program 208, which passes the request to TCP/IP program 210, which then accesses the site through the Internet as known within the art. - However, the invention adds an intervening
control layer 212 between thesocket services program 208 and the TCP/IP program 210. Interveningcontrol layer 212 monitors information passed betweensocket services program 208 and TCP/IP program 210; when a URL address passes through,layer 212 intercepts the URL address to determine whether content at the address is permissible to be accessed.Layer 212 accomplishes this in a two-fold manner. First,layer 212checks cache 214 to determine whether the address is listed therein.Cache 214 is a cache of addresses that were previously determined to refer to permissible content. If the address is not incache 214,layer 212polls monitoring server 204, askingmonitoring server 204 if the content at the requested URL address is permissible.Layer 212 is desirably software (e.g., a computer program) running onclient computer 200. Note thatlayer 212 desirably does not make direct calls to TCP/IP program 210. -
Server 204 maintains a database of permissible content (referenced by URL addresses), such as a SQL database of such content. When it receives a request fromclient 200 as to whether content at a given URL address is permitted to be accessed,server 204 determines whether the address is in the database, indicating that the content at this address is permissible.Server 204 desirably accomplishes this by running a computer program having this functionality. If the content is deemed permissible,layer 212 permits the requested URL address to pass through to TCP/IP program 210, and further adds the address tocache 214, so that subsequent permission to programs running on the client to access the content at this URL address can be given without repeated polling ofserver 204. If the address is not in the database,layer 212 does not permit the requested URL address to pass through to TCP/IP program 210, effectively denying access to the content at this URL address by the requesting program running onclient 200. - The manner by which the database is maintained by the server is not limited under the invention. The database may be maintained by a separate database server that is a part of monitoring server 204 (where
monitoring server 204 also includes a web server). Furthermore, in one embodiment, permissible content is divided into two types:type 1 andtype 2.Type 1 permissible content is any file at a given URL address. For example, if a permitted URL address is “http://www.permissible.com,” any file within any subdirectory at this URL address is permitted—“http://www.permissible.com/file.htm, http://www.permissible.com/directory1/directory2/file3.htm,” etc.Type 2 permissible content is any file within any subdirectory within a given directory or subdirectory at a given URL address. For example, if a permitted directory at a URL address is “http://www.permissible.com/permissible,” any file within any subdirectory within the directory “permissible” would be permissible. That is, “http://www.permissible.com/permissible/file.htm,” and “http://www.permissible.com/permissible/directory/file2.htm” would be permissible, but “http://www.permissible.com/notpermissible/file5.htm” would not be. - Furthermore,
type 2 permissible content includes image files, as denoted by .JPG or .GIF suffixes, so long as they reside at the same URL address, regardless of which directory or subdirectory within the URL address they reside. This exception is made because frequently all images at a web site are stored at a location separate from the web pages using those images. Inasmuch as the web pages using those images have been deemed to be permissible, it is assumed that those images are permissible as well. Thus, the database maintained by the server includes permissible content, such that at least some of the content includes all HTML pages located at a web site (type 1), or an incomplete portion of all the HTML pages located at the site (type 2). - Referring next to
FIG. 2( b), a diagram of a computerized system in accordance with another embodiment of the invention is shown.Client computer 400 is able to accesssites 402 as permitted by monitoringserver 404. Each ofclient computer 400,sites 402, andmonitoring server 404 is communicatively coupled to one another via theInternet 406. Furthermore, each ofclient computer 400 andmonitoring server 404 may be a computer such as that shown in and described in conjunction withFIG. 1 , although the invention is not so limited. Thus, each ofclient computer 400, andmonitoring server 404 has a processor, a computer-readable medium from which computer programs are executed by the processor, and desirably a communications device, such as a network card, or a modem. The communications device provides an Internet connection for the computer. -
Monitoring server 404 and each ofsites 402 desirably is or includes an Internet world-wide-web server, as known in the art, such that it has assigned thereto a Universal Resource Locator (URL) address to permitclient computer 400, as well as other computers, to access the web server. The invention is not particularly limited to a given type of web server. Typical examples include those running software available from Netscape, Microsoft, Apple, Apache, NCSA, and others. Each web server is also not limited to running on a particular operating system (OS); common operating systems including Microsoft Windows 95, Microsoft Windows NT, Apple MacOS and UNIX. Furthermore, each ofsites 402 includes content referenced by URL addresses, such as multimedia content, web pages, images that are part of web pages, etc. More specifically, the content as referenced by URL address includes a plurality of hypertext-markup-language (HTML) pages located at a site; the content may be in a particular directory on a storage device located at the site, or in one or more directories within the storage device. -
Client 400 includes a standard mechanism by which programs running on the client access thesites 402 through the Internet. The standard mechanism as shown inFIG. 2( a) includes asocket services program 408, such as WinSock or Open Transport, that provides a service layer, and a TCP/IP handler program 410, that provides a TCP/IP transport layer. Thus, when a computer program running onclient 400 attempts to access asite 402 via a URL address, it passes this information tosocket services program 408, which passes the request to TCP/IP program 410, which then accesses the site through the Internet as known within the art (i.e., throughnetwork layer 411 andphysical layer 413, as known within the art). Thenetwork layer 411, the transport layer provided by the TCP/IP program 410, and the service layer provided by the program 408 (e.g., WinSock or Open Transport) are all known parts of the Open Systems Interconnection (OSI) model known to those of ordinary skill in the art. - However, the invention adds an intervening
control layer 412 between thesocket services program 408 and the TCP/IP program 410, via ahook 413 within amemory address 415 ofprogram 408. Interveningcontrol layer 412 monitors information passed betweensocket services program 408 and TCP/IP program 410; when a URL address passes through,layer 412 intercepts the URL address to determine whether content at the address is permissible to be accessed.Layer 412 accomplishes this in a two-fold manner. First,layer 412checks cache 414 to determine whether the address is listed therein.Cache 414 is a cache of addresses that were previously determined to refer to permissible content. If the address is not incache 414,layer 412polls monitoring server 404, askingmonitoring server 404 if the content at the requested URL address is permissible, as represented byblock 416.Layer 412 is desirably software (e.g., a computer program) running onclient computer 400. Note thatlayer 412 desirably does not make direct calls to TCP/IP program 410. -
Server 404 maintains a database of permissible content (referenced by URL addresses), such as a SQL database of such content. When it receives a request fromclient 400 as to whether content at a given URL address is permitted to be accessed,server 404 determines whether the address is in the database, indicating that the content at this address is permissible.Server 404 desirably accomplishes this by running a computer program having this functionality. If the content is deemed permissible,layer 412 permits the requested URL address to pass through to TCP/IP program 410—i.e., as represented bycall 417, such thathook 413 is bypassed—and further adds the address tocache 414, so that subsequent permission to programs running on the client to access the content at this URL address can be given without repeated polling ofserver 404. If the address is not in the database,layer 412 does not permit the requested URL address to pass through to TCP/IP program 410, effectively denying access to the content at this URL address by the requesting program running onclient 400. - The manner by which the database is maintained by the server is not limited under the invention. The database may be maintained by a separate database server that is a part of monitoring server 404 (where
monitoring server 404 also includes a web server). Furthermore, in one embodiment, permissible content is divided into two types:type 1 andtype 2.Type 1 permissible content is any file at a given URL address. For example, if a permitted URL address is “http://www.permissible.com,” any file within any subdirectory at this URL address is permitted—“http://www.permissible.com/file.htm, http://www.permissible.com/directory1/directory2/file3.htm,” etc.Type 2 permissible content is any file within any subdirectory within a given directory or subdirectory at a given URL address. For example, if a permitted directory at a URL address is “http://www.permissible.com/permissible,” any file within any subdirectory within the directory “permissible” would be permissible. That is, “http://www.permissible.com/permissible/file.htm,” and “http://www.permissible.com/permissible/directory/file2.htm” would be permissible, but “http://www.permissible.com/notpermissiblelfile5.htm” would not be. - Furthermore,
type 2 permissible content includes image files, as denoted by .JPG or GIF suffixes, so long as they reside at the same URL address, regardless of which directory or subdirectory within the URL address they reside. This exception is made because frequently all images at a web site are stored at a location separate from the web pages using those images. Inasmuch as the web pages using those images have been deemed to be permissible, it is assumed that those images are permissible as well. Thus, the database maintained by the server includes permissible content, such that at least some of the content includes all HTML pages located at a web site (type 1), or an incomplete portion of all the HTML pages located at the site (type 2). - The computerized system according to one embodiment of the invention shown in
FIG. 2( b) may be also described in another manner, via a min-proxy server conceptualization. In the embodiment ofFIG. 2( b), hooking, as known in the art, intomemory address 415 of the service layer provided by program 408 (as represented by arrow 413) is accomplished. When an application makes a call to the service layer—i.e., for specific content at a given site as referenced by an address—this call is then remapped to the interveningcontrol layer 412. The call is then processed. First,cache 414 is checked, and desirably includes configuration information. If the call is not within the cache, then the an internal process is called, as represented byblock 416. This internal process calls the service layer provided byprogram 408 itself, except that it bypasses the hook and goes to themonitoring server 404. The server performs the check, returning the results to the service layer, which returns it to the process as represented byblock 416. The process then decides whether to allow the original call (more specifically, making the original call), or return it as “access denied”. If it makes the original call, it remaps the call to the original and bypasses the hook. - Desirably, embodiments of the invention do not depend on URL address only. That is, the embodiments of the invention check the actual IP (Internet Protocol) address that is being called, and not the URL address. This assists in the invention catching circumvention attempts that use a HOSTS file that remaps any URL address to an IP address, as is known in the art. This is an advantage of the invention. Thus, as used generally herein, the term address may correspond to IP address and/or URL address. (E.g., the phrase “each site having content referenced by addresses” includes either IP addresses and/or URL addresses.)
- Referring next to
FIG. 3 , a flowchart of a computerized method according to an embodiment of the invention is shown. This method is inclusive of the steps or acts required to be taken by a client computer and a server computer to monitor Internet access by programs running on the client computer, in accordance with one embodiment of the invention. These steps or acts are performed in accordance with one or more computer programs, such as the intervening control layer and the server program that accesses the database stored on the server, as have been described in conjunction withFIG. 2( a) andFIG. 2( b). The embodiment of the invention described in conjunction withFIG. 3 refers to the situation where the client, the server and a plurality of sites are communicatively coupled to one another through the Internet, where the client is running a web browser program, the server is or includes a web server, and the sites are Internet world-wide-web sites maintained by web servers; however, the invention is not so limited. - In
step 300, a web browser or other program running on the client requests content at a server, as referenced by a URL address. Instep 302, this URL request is received at a standard mechanism on the client by which programs running on the client access content on the plurality of sites. Such a standard mechanism may include a socket services program and a TCP/IP handler program, as has been described. Further instep 302, the URL request is intercepted by an intervening layer within the standard mechanism. The intervening layer then checks a cache to determine whether the URL address is listed therein. - If the URL address is not in the cache, control proceeds from step 304 to step 306. In
step 306, the intervening control layer contacts the monitoring server. The monitoring server instep 306contacts database 308, to determine whether the URL address (viz., content addressed thereby) is in the database. If the content is nottype 1 ortype 2 permissible content, as has been previously described, then control proceeds fromstep 310 to step 312, and the method ends with the intervening control layer denying the web browser or other program access to the content at this URL instep 312. However, if the content istype 1 ortype 2 permissible content, then control proceeds instead to step 314, at which step the intervening control layer places the URL address in the cache. - Finally, if in step 304 the requested URL address has been found in the cache, or after
step 314, once a permitted URL address (viz., content addressed thereby) has been placed in the cache, then control proceeds to step 316. Instep 316, the intervening control layer of the client permits the program running on the client that had accessed the URL address deemed to be permissible to access the content at this URL address. - Site access via an intervening control layer has been described. Although specific embodiments have been illustrated and described herein, it will be appreciated by those of ordinary skill in the art that any arrangement which is calculated to achieve the same purpose may be substituted for the specific embodiments shown. This application is intended to cover any adaptations or variations of the present invention. For example, the invention is fully intended to cover databases as well as dynamic directories, such that the term directory may be interpreted to encompass any database amenable to the invention in such an embodiment of the invention. Therefore, it is manifestly intended that this invention be limited only by the following claims and equivalents thereof.
Claims (5)
1.-37. (canceled)
38. A system comprising:
a computer that has access to one or more destination sites, the one or more destination sites being hosted on one or more servers and having content referenced by one or more addresses; and
a monitoring server that is distinct from the one or more servers, the monitoring server having one or more rules that govern access to the one or more destination sites, and wherein the computer is denied access to one of the destination sites if the one or more rules disallow such access.
39. The system of claim 38 , wherein the computer comprises:
a processor;
a random-access memory;
a read-only memory; and
one or more storage devices.
40. The system of claim 39 , wherein the one or more storage devices are selected from a group consisting of a hard disk drive, a floppy disk drive, an optical disk drive, and a tape cartridge drive.
41-48. (canceled)
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US11/965,547 US20080168535A1 (en) | 1997-12-01 | 2007-12-27 | Systems and methods for site access |
Applications Claiming Priority (3)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US08/982,240 US6446128B1 (en) | 1997-12-01 | 1997-12-01 | Site access via intervening control layer |
US10/099,196 US7334037B2 (en) | 1997-12-01 | 2002-03-13 | Systems and methods for site access |
US11/965,547 US20080168535A1 (en) | 1997-12-01 | 2007-12-27 | Systems and methods for site access |
Related Parent Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US10/099,196 Continuation US7334037B2 (en) | 1997-12-01 | 2002-03-13 | Systems and methods for site access |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
US20080168535A1 true US20080168535A1 (en) | 2008-07-10 |
Family
ID=25528974
Family Applications (3)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US08/982,240 Expired - Lifetime US6446128B1 (en) | 1997-12-01 | 1997-12-01 | Site access via intervening control layer |
US10/099,196 Expired - Fee Related US7334037B2 (en) | 1997-12-01 | 2002-03-13 | Systems and methods for site access |
US11/965,547 Abandoned US20080168535A1 (en) | 1997-12-01 | 2007-12-27 | Systems and methods for site access |
Family Applications Before (2)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US08/982,240 Expired - Lifetime US6446128B1 (en) | 1997-12-01 | 1997-12-01 | Site access via intervening control layer |
US10/099,196 Expired - Fee Related US7334037B2 (en) | 1997-12-01 | 2002-03-13 | Systems and methods for site access |
Country Status (1)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (3) | US6446128B1 (en) |
Cited By (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN105812476A (en) * | 2016-04-05 | 2016-07-27 | 深圳市深信服电子科技有限公司 | Method and device for accessing rejected website |
Families Citing this family (42)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US6446128B1 (en) * | 1997-12-01 | 2002-09-03 | Netselector, Inc. | Site access via intervening control layer |
US7062465B1 (en) * | 1999-08-31 | 2006-06-13 | Verizon Services Corp. | Methods and apparatus for providing agent controlled synchronized browsing at a terminal |
US6771766B1 (en) * | 1999-08-31 | 2004-08-03 | Verizon Services Corp. | Methods and apparatus for providing live agent assistance |
CA2403709C (en) * | 2000-03-17 | 2007-11-20 | America Online, Inc. | Home-networking |
US7475404B2 (en) | 2000-05-18 | 2009-01-06 | Maquis Techtrix Llc | System and method for implementing click-through for browser executed software including ad proxy and proxy cookie caching |
US8086697B2 (en) | 2005-06-28 | 2011-12-27 | Claria Innovations, Llc | Techniques for displaying impressions in documents delivered over a computer network |
US7647339B2 (en) * | 2000-10-04 | 2010-01-12 | Gonzalez Emmanuel C | Method for digitally labeling websites |
US7181488B2 (en) | 2001-06-29 | 2007-02-20 | Claria Corporation | System, method and computer program product for presenting information to a user utilizing historical information about the user |
US7219139B2 (en) * | 2001-06-29 | 2007-05-15 | Claria Corporation | System and method for using continuous messaging units in a network architecture |
US7149704B2 (en) | 2001-06-29 | 2006-12-12 | Claria Corporation | System, method and computer program product for collecting information about a network user |
US20030005081A1 (en) * | 2001-06-29 | 2003-01-02 | Hunt Preston J. | Method and apparatus for a passive network-based internet address caching system |
US8521827B2 (en) | 2001-10-18 | 2013-08-27 | Carhamm Ltd., Llc | Presentation of information to end-users |
US20040083474A1 (en) * | 2001-10-18 | 2004-04-29 | Mckinlay Eric | System, method and computer program product for initiating a software download |
US6687793B1 (en) * | 2001-12-28 | 2004-02-03 | Vignette Corporation | Method and system for optimizing resources for cache management |
US7383339B1 (en) | 2002-07-31 | 2008-06-03 | Aol Llc, A Delaware Limited Liability Company | Local proxy server for establishing device controls |
US7603341B2 (en) | 2002-11-05 | 2009-10-13 | Claria Corporation | Updating the content of a presentation vehicle in a computer network |
US20040193605A1 (en) * | 2003-03-25 | 2004-09-30 | Weisman Mitchell T. | Control of access to computers in a computer network |
US20040189710A1 (en) * | 2003-03-28 | 2004-09-30 | Goulden David L. | Technique for displaying a window in a computer screen |
US7337219B1 (en) | 2003-05-30 | 2008-02-26 | Aol Llc, A Delaware Limited Liability Company | Classifying devices using a local proxy server |
US8028059B1 (en) * | 2003-06-02 | 2011-09-27 | Aol Inc. | Page views for proxy servers |
US20050027820A1 (en) * | 2003-06-02 | 2005-02-03 | O'laughlen Eric | Page views proxy servers |
CN100452014C (en) * | 2003-06-02 | 2009-01-14 | 美国在线服务公司 | Page views for proxy servers |
US20050015442A1 (en) * | 2003-06-02 | 2005-01-20 | O'laughlen Eric | Page views for proxy servers |
US7725580B1 (en) * | 2003-10-31 | 2010-05-25 | Aol Inc. | Location-based regulation of access |
US8170912B2 (en) | 2003-11-25 | 2012-05-01 | Carhamm Ltd., Llc | Database structure and front end |
US20060036674A1 (en) * | 2004-05-11 | 2006-02-16 | Walden Chris S | Broadcasting network and content delivery system |
US8255413B2 (en) | 2004-08-19 | 2012-08-28 | Carhamm Ltd., Llc | Method and apparatus for responding to request for information-personalization |
US8078602B2 (en) | 2004-12-17 | 2011-12-13 | Claria Innovations, Llc | Search engine for a computer network |
US7693863B2 (en) | 2004-12-20 | 2010-04-06 | Claria Corporation | Method and device for publishing cross-network user behavioral data |
US8645941B2 (en) | 2005-03-07 | 2014-02-04 | Carhamm Ltd., Llc | Method for attributing and allocating revenue related to embedded software |
US8073866B2 (en) | 2005-03-17 | 2011-12-06 | Claria Innovations, Llc | Method for providing content to an internet user based on the user's demonstrated content preferences |
US7548969B2 (en) | 2005-07-27 | 2009-06-16 | Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. | Computer system polling with adjustable intervals based on rules and server states |
US8352917B2 (en) | 2006-06-26 | 2013-01-08 | Adobe Systems Incorporated | Web-beacon plug-ins and their certification |
US7992135B1 (en) * | 2006-06-26 | 2011-08-02 | Adobe Systems Incorporated | Certification of server-side partner plug-ins for analytics and privacy protection |
US20080060062A1 (en) * | 2006-08-31 | 2008-03-06 | Robert B Lord | Methods and systems for preventing information theft |
US8620952B2 (en) | 2007-01-03 | 2013-12-31 | Carhamm Ltd., Llc | System for database reporting |
GB0709574D0 (en) * | 2007-05-18 | 2007-06-27 | Aurix Ltd | Speech Screening |
US8387140B2 (en) | 2010-10-15 | 2013-02-26 | Apple Inc. | Method and apparatus for controlling access to encrypted network communication channels |
US9367542B2 (en) * | 2013-01-10 | 2016-06-14 | International Business Machines Corporation | Facilitating access to resource(s) idenfitied by reference(s) included in electronic communications |
CN104850618B (en) * | 2015-05-18 | 2018-06-01 | 北京京东尚科信息技术有限公司 | A kind of system and method that ordered data is provided |
US10637906B2 (en) | 2017-10-31 | 2020-04-28 | Cisco Technology, Inc. | Dynamic socket QoS settings for web service connections |
KR20240007160A (en) | 2021-04-12 | 2024-01-16 | 스트럭처럴 서비시스, 인크. | Systems and methods for supporting crane operators |
Citations (10)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US5678041A (en) * | 1995-06-06 | 1997-10-14 | At&T | System and method for restricting user access rights on the internet based on rating information stored in a relational database |
US5784564A (en) * | 1996-05-03 | 1998-07-21 | High Technology Solutions, Inc. | Closed browser for computer and computer network |
US5835726A (en) * | 1993-12-15 | 1998-11-10 | Check Point Software Technologies Ltd. | System for securing the flow of and selectively modifying packets in a computer network |
US5889958A (en) * | 1996-12-20 | 1999-03-30 | Livingston Enterprises, Inc. | Network access control system and process |
US5987606A (en) * | 1997-03-19 | 1999-11-16 | Bascom Global Internet Services, Inc. | Method and system for content filtering information retrieved from an internet computer network |
US5996011A (en) * | 1997-03-25 | 1999-11-30 | Unified Research Laboratories, Inc. | System and method for filtering data received by a computer system |
US6065059A (en) * | 1996-12-10 | 2000-05-16 | International Business Machines Corporation | Filtered utilization of internet data transfers to reduce delay and increase user control |
US6286045B1 (en) * | 1997-05-19 | 2001-09-04 | Matchlogic, Inc. | Information storage and delivery over a computer network using centralized intelligence to monitor and control the information being delivered |
US6324552B1 (en) * | 1997-11-25 | 2001-11-27 | International Business Machines Corporation | Browsers for focused access of data |
US7031954B1 (en) * | 1997-09-10 | 2006-04-18 | Google, Inc. | Document retrieval system with access control |
Family Cites Families (26)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US5473772A (en) * | 1991-04-02 | 1995-12-05 | International Business Machines Corporation | Automatic update of static and dynamic files at a remote network node in response to calls issued by or for application programs |
US5586260A (en) * | 1993-02-12 | 1996-12-17 | Digital Equipment Corporation | Method and apparatus for authenticating a client to a server in computer systems which support different security mechanisms |
US5544322A (en) * | 1994-05-09 | 1996-08-06 | International Business Machines Corporation | System and method for policy-based inter-realm authentication within a distributed processing system |
US5956715A (en) * | 1994-12-13 | 1999-09-21 | Microsoft Corporation | Method and system for controlling user access to a resource in a networked computing environment |
US5706507A (en) * | 1995-07-05 | 1998-01-06 | International Business Machines Corporation | System and method for controlling access to data located on a content server |
US5657390A (en) * | 1995-08-25 | 1997-08-12 | Netscape Communications Corporation | Secure socket layer application program apparatus and method |
US5961645A (en) * | 1995-10-02 | 1999-10-05 | At&T Corp. | Filtering for public databases with naming ambiguities |
US6085223A (en) * | 1995-10-20 | 2000-07-04 | Ncr Corporation | Method and apparatus for providing database information to non-requesting clients |
CN1104142C (en) * | 1995-12-11 | 2003-03-26 | 惠普公司 | Method of accessing service resource items that are for use in a telecommunications system |
US5784566A (en) * | 1996-01-11 | 1998-07-21 | Oracle Corporation | System and method for negotiating security services and algorithms for communication across a computer network |
US5815665A (en) * | 1996-04-03 | 1998-09-29 | Microsoft Corporation | System and method for providing trusted brokering services over a distributed network |
US5884033A (en) * | 1996-05-15 | 1999-03-16 | Spyglass, Inc. | Internet filtering system for filtering data transferred over the internet utilizing immediate and deferred filtering actions |
US5935207A (en) * | 1996-06-03 | 1999-08-10 | Webtv Networks, Inc. | Method and apparatus for providing remote site administrators with user hits on mirrored web sites |
US5835722A (en) * | 1996-06-27 | 1998-11-10 | Logon Data Corporation | System to control content and prohibit certain interactive attempts by a person using a personal computer |
US5757925A (en) * | 1996-07-23 | 1998-05-26 | Faybishenko; Yaroslav | Secure platform independent cross-platform remote execution computer system and method |
US5983350A (en) * | 1996-09-18 | 1999-11-09 | Secure Computing Corporation | Secure firewall supporting different levels of authentication based on address or encryption status |
US5950195A (en) * | 1996-09-18 | 1999-09-07 | Secure Computing Corporation | Generalized security policy management system and method |
US6049821A (en) * | 1997-01-24 | 2000-04-11 | Motorola, Inc. | Proxy host computer and method for accessing and retrieving information between a browser and a proxy |
US6434607B1 (en) * | 1997-06-19 | 2002-08-13 | International Business Machines Corporation | Web server providing role-based multi-level security |
US6055543A (en) | 1997-11-21 | 2000-04-25 | Verano | File wrapper containing cataloging information for content searching across multiple platforms |
US6037934A (en) * | 1997-11-21 | 2000-03-14 | International Business Machines Corporation | Named bookmark sets |
US6446128B1 (en) * | 1997-12-01 | 2002-09-03 | Netselector, Inc. | Site access via intervening control layer |
US6360205B1 (en) * | 1998-10-30 | 2002-03-19 | Trip.Com, Inc. | Obtaining and utilizing commercial information |
GB2348970B (en) * | 1998-12-29 | 2003-10-22 | Sgs Thomson Microelectronics | Maintenance of a system model |
US6662232B1 (en) * | 1998-12-29 | 2003-12-09 | Pitney Bowes Ltd. | Dynamic E-mail re-transmitting system having time parameters |
US6629097B1 (en) * | 1999-04-28 | 2003-09-30 | Douglas K. Keith | Displaying implicit associations among items in loosely-structured data sets |
-
1997
- 1997-12-01 US US08/982,240 patent/US6446128B1/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
-
2002
- 2002-03-13 US US10/099,196 patent/US7334037B2/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
-
2007
- 2007-12-27 US US11/965,547 patent/US20080168535A1/en not_active Abandoned
Patent Citations (10)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US5835726A (en) * | 1993-12-15 | 1998-11-10 | Check Point Software Technologies Ltd. | System for securing the flow of and selectively modifying packets in a computer network |
US5678041A (en) * | 1995-06-06 | 1997-10-14 | At&T | System and method for restricting user access rights on the internet based on rating information stored in a relational database |
US5784564A (en) * | 1996-05-03 | 1998-07-21 | High Technology Solutions, Inc. | Closed browser for computer and computer network |
US6065059A (en) * | 1996-12-10 | 2000-05-16 | International Business Machines Corporation | Filtered utilization of internet data transfers to reduce delay and increase user control |
US5889958A (en) * | 1996-12-20 | 1999-03-30 | Livingston Enterprises, Inc. | Network access control system and process |
US5987606A (en) * | 1997-03-19 | 1999-11-16 | Bascom Global Internet Services, Inc. | Method and system for content filtering information retrieved from an internet computer network |
US5996011A (en) * | 1997-03-25 | 1999-11-30 | Unified Research Laboratories, Inc. | System and method for filtering data received by a computer system |
US6286045B1 (en) * | 1997-05-19 | 2001-09-04 | Matchlogic, Inc. | Information storage and delivery over a computer network using centralized intelligence to monitor and control the information being delivered |
US7031954B1 (en) * | 1997-09-10 | 2006-04-18 | Google, Inc. | Document retrieval system with access control |
US6324552B1 (en) * | 1997-11-25 | 2001-11-27 | International Business Machines Corporation | Browsers for focused access of data |
Cited By (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN105812476A (en) * | 2016-04-05 | 2016-07-27 | 深圳市深信服电子科技有限公司 | Method and device for accessing rejected website |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
US7334037B2 (en) | 2008-02-19 |
US20020087692A1 (en) | 2002-07-04 |
US6446128B1 (en) | 2002-09-03 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US7334037B2 (en) | Systems and methods for site access | |
RU2336561C2 (en) | Content filtering in process of web-viewing | |
US5991760A (en) | Method and apparatus for modifying copies of remotely stored documents using a web browser | |
US6105028A (en) | Method and apparatus for accessing copies of documents using a web browser request interceptor | |
US9678734B2 (en) | System and method for passive detection and context sensitive notification of upgrade availability for computer information | |
EP0811939B1 (en) | Method and apparatus for providing proxying and transcoding of documents in a distributed metwork | |
EP1008087B1 (en) | Method and apparatus for remote network access logging and reporting | |
KR100311191B1 (en) | Customization of web pages based on requester type | |
US6633315B1 (en) | Context-based dynamic user interface elements | |
US6556995B1 (en) | Method to provide global sign-on for ODBC-based database applications | |
US6192398B1 (en) | Remote/shared browser cache | |
US6789201B2 (en) | Anti-virus toolbar system and method for use with a network browser | |
AU760998B2 (en) | Client-server dynamic file access system and method | |
US6704797B1 (en) | Method and system for distributing image-based content on the internet | |
KR100450472B1 (en) | Web server apparatus and method for virus checking | |
US7478423B2 (en) | Protected execution environments within a computer system | |
US7213060B2 (en) | Web based creation of printer instances on a workstation | |
US8429201B2 (en) | Updating a database from a browser | |
US6308210B1 (en) | Method and apparatus for traffic control and balancing for an internet site | |
US6701364B1 (en) | Method and apparatus for remote computer management using web browser application to display system hardware and software configuration | |
KR20060093306A (en) | Local domain name service system and method for providing service using domain name service system | |
US7987171B2 (en) | Providing parallel generic web site supporting anonymous or semi-anonymous internet activity | |
EP1504374A1 (en) | Automatic proxy detection | |
US6633874B1 (en) | Method for improving the performance of a web service by caching the most popular (real-time) information | |
US7689913B2 (en) | Managing internet pornography effectively |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
STCB | Information on status: application discontinuation |
Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION |