US20090018860A1 - Method and computer program for back office check conversion - Google Patents

Method and computer program for back office check conversion Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US20090018860A1
US20090018860A1 US11/971,000 US97100008A US2009018860A1 US 20090018860 A1 US20090018860 A1 US 20090018860A1 US 97100008 A US97100008 A US 97100008A US 2009018860 A1 US2009018860 A1 US 2009018860A1
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
check
check data
set forth
data
computer program
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Abandoned
Application number
US11/971,000
Inventor
Joel Edward Sikes
Gilbert H. Anderson
Richard Wesley Palmer
Steven Rob Bryer
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Balance Innovations LLC
Original Assignee
Individual
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Individual filed Critical Individual
Priority to US11/971,000 priority Critical patent/US20090018860A1/en
Assigned to BALANCE INNOVATIONS, LLC reassignment BALANCE INNOVATIONS, LLC ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: SIKES, JOEL EDWARD, ANDERSON, GILBERT H., BRYER, STEVEN ROB, PALMER, RICHARD WESLEY
Publication of US20090018860A1 publication Critical patent/US20090018860A1/en
Abandoned legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06QINFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q10/00Administration; Management
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06QINFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q20/00Payment architectures, schemes or protocols
    • G06Q20/04Payment circuits
    • G06Q20/042Payment circuits characterized in that the payment protocol involves at least one cheque
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06QINFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q30/00Commerce
    • G06Q30/06Buying, selling or leasing transactions

Definitions

  • the present invention relates broadly to methods and computer programs for check processing. More specifically, the present invention concerns a method and computer program for facilitating back office check conversion in a retail establishment, such as during reconciliation of cash drawers, wherein the method broadly involves imaging a check, comparing check data from a point of sale terminal with check data captured by the imaging device, and determining whether the check is eligible for processing.
  • the present invention addresses the above-identified and other problems and limitations by providing a method and a computer program stored on a computer readable medium for facilitating back office check conversion in a retail establishment, such as during reconciliation of cash drawers.
  • the method broadly comprises the steps of electronically retrieving first check data from a point of sale system; imaging the check using an imaging device to capture second check data; comparing the first check data and the second check data to confirm that they are substantially identical; determining whether the check is eligible for automated processing; and, if the check is eligible for automated processing, adding the image of the check to an electronic file for subsequent transmission of the check data to a financial institution.
  • the present invention may further include one or more of the following additional features.
  • the check data may include magnetic ink character recognition line data.
  • the check data may include a routing number, an account number, a check serial number, and a dollar amount.
  • the method may include the additional step of receiving from the financial institution an electronic acknowledgement of receipt of the check data.
  • the method may include the additional step of allowing for scheduling automatic resubmission of a returned check, wherein automatic resubmission may occur after a specified number of days or may occur at a specified time of the month.
  • the method may include the additional steps of maintaining an electronic database of the check data, and allowing for accessing and searching the electronic database for particular check data via an electronic network.
  • the method may be implemented electronically by a computer program comprising one or more code segments stored on a computer-readable medium and executable by a computing device.
  • FIG. 1 is a flowchart of steps involved in practicing the method of the present invention.
  • ACH automated clearing house
  • BOC back office conversion
  • IRD image replacement document
  • MICR magnetic ink character recognition
  • POP point of purchase
  • POS point of sale
  • the present invention concerns a method and a computer program stored on a computer readable medium for facilitating back office check conversion in a retail establishment, such as during reconciliation of cash drawers.
  • the “Check Clearing for the 21st Century Act”, or “Check 21”, encourages financial institutions to exchange digital images of checks rather than the original paper checks.
  • the Act also gives substitute checks, called image replacement documents (IRDs), printed from these digital images the same legal status as the original paper checks, so that financial institutions unwilling to accept digital images receive IRDs instead.
  • IRDs image replacement documents
  • This will save significant time and money spent processing paper checks; at one point, for example, it cost the Federal Reserve 4.5 cents to process a paper check, but it costs only 1.3 cents to process an automated clearing house (ACH) payment.
  • ACH automated clearing house
  • the ACH network is a nationwide system for electronically transferring funds, and allows participating financial institutions to quickly and efficiently clear electronic payments.
  • Back office conversion allows retailers to convert paper checks to ACH entries in the back office environment rather than at the point of sale (POS) terminal, thereby providing the benefits of reduced cost and risk without prolonging tender time or requiring costly hardware at every POS terminal. Instead of encoding checks for subsequent physical deposit, the checks are imaged for electronic presentment to the bank.
  • the method of the present invention may be practiced during reconciliation of cash drawers.
  • a computer program for managing cash drawers such as the VeriBalanceTM program by Balance Innovations, LLC, retrieves magnetic ink character recognition (MICR) data, including the routing number, account number, check serial number, and dollar amount, from the POS system, as shown in box 100 .
  • the paper check is imaged by back office personnel using an imaging/scanning device to independently capture the MICR data, as shown in box 102 .
  • the check is imaged by the cashier using an imaging/scanning device at the POS terminal.
  • the MICR data from the POS terminal is compared with the MICR data independently generated by the imaging operation, as shown in box 104 . Additionally, the courtesy and legal dollar amounts shown on the check may be compared with the POS dollar amount; CAR-LAR (“Courtesy Amount Recognition—Legal Amount Recognition”) software is available to facilitate this particular comparison. Relatedly, where POS data is not available for comparison with the imaged data, the CAR-LAR software may be used to determine whether the image is of sufficient quality for use.
  • ACH Check 21, image exchange, or other processing
  • IRD IRD needs to be sent to deposit the check because the check does not meet NACHA guidelines for BOC conversion, as shown in box 106 .
  • ineligible checks include checks drawn on business accounts, third-party checks, demand drafts without signatures, credit card checks, bank drafts (i.e., money orders, certified checks, and traveler's checks), government checks, and checks not payable in U.S. currency.
  • the check is eligible, it is added to a BOC file for subsequent transmittal to the bank. Thereafter, the retailer receives a settlement report to verify deposits and returns.
  • the retailer can schedule automatic resubmission of the returned checks after a specified number of days, e.g., ten days, after the check is returned or at a specified time each month, e.g., the first or the fifteenth day of the month, as shown in box 108 .
  • expedited re-presentment can significantly reduce losses from returned checks. This feature is further facilitated by the fact that checks processed using BOC are generally returned in two to four days, while paper checks processed conventionally are generally not returned for seven to ten days.
  • a separate transaction is initiated to collect the fee the retailer charges for returned checks.
  • a database of the check images is maintained locally by the retailer, while, in another embodiment, the database is maintained remotely by a third-party for the benefit of the retailer. Advantages of the latter embodiment include storage capacity advantages, efficiencies of scale advantages, and security advantages.
  • the retailer can access the database via a secure network portal using encrypted SQL.
  • the retailer can search the database by a relevant search criterion, such as amount, account, store, or date, as shown in box 110 .
  • a relevant search criterion such as amount, account, store, or date, as shown in box 110 .
  • the database also allows for destroying the original paper checks after a specified period of time while still maintaining the relevant check data.
  • electronic entries in the database can be automatically deleted after a specified period of time, which, in one implementation, may be specified by each store.
  • the present invention can reduce check processing costs, including check clearing fees and surcharges for special handling of, e.g., unencoded or otherwise rejected checks; accelerate access to payments (one to two days rather than three to four or more days) and thereby reduce float costs; and reduce losses though an expedited electronic process for handling returned checks. Additionally, the present invention can reduce courier costs associated with transporting paper checks to banks, and some labor costs associated with processing and handling paper checks.
  • the above-described method can be implemented electronically by a computer program comprising one or more code segments stored on a computer-readable medium and executable by a computing device.

Abstract

A method and computer program for facilitating back office check conversion in a retail establishment, such as during reconciliation of cash drawers. The method broadly includes the steps of retrieving first check data from a point of sale system; imaging the check to capture second check data; comparing the first and second check data to confirm that they are substantially identical; determining whether the check is eligible for automated processing; and, if so, adding the image of the check to an electronic file for subsequent transmission of the check data to a financial institution. The method may also include allowing for scheduling automatic resubmission of a returned check. The method may also include maintaining a database of the check data, and allowing for accessing and searching the database for particular check data via an electronic network.

Description

    RELATED APPLICATIONS
  • The present U.S. non-provisional patent application is related to and claims priority benefit of an earlier-filed U.S. provisional patent application of the same title, Ser. No. 60/883,854, filed Jan. 8, 2007. The identified earlier-filed application is hereby incorporated by reference into the present application as though fully set forth herein.
  • FIELD OF THE INVENTION
  • The present invention relates broadly to methods and computer programs for check processing. More specifically, the present invention concerns a method and computer program for facilitating back office check conversion in a retail establishment, such as during reconciliation of cash drawers, wherein the method broadly involves imaging a check, comparing check data from a point of sale terminal with check data captured by the imaging device, and determining whether the check is eligible for processing.
  • BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
  • Many retail establishments accept checks in payment of goods or services. Unfortunately for the retailers, checks are expensive and time-consuming to process. Furthermore, it can take three to four days or more after submitting checks to the retailers' banks before the checks settle and the retailers are credited the check amounts to their accounts. This delay is due in part to a presentment delay, which is the time required to physically deliver the checks to the banks, and in part to a funds availability delay, which is the time required by the banks, after receiving delivery of the checks, to make the funds available to the retailers. The presentment delay is always at least one day and is generally longer, depending on how often couriers are scheduled to pick-up and transport the checks to the banks. The funds availability delay is generally one to two days. During this delay, the retailers are, in effect, loaning the purchase amounts, without interest, to the consumers.
  • Systems exist for converting paper checks to automated clearing house payments at the point of sale (POS), but these have not been widely accepted because they require that customers give written authorization (in addition to signing the check) and require that imaging devices be installed at every POS terminal.
  • SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
  • The present invention addresses the above-identified and other problems and limitations by providing a method and a computer program stored on a computer readable medium for facilitating back office check conversion in a retail establishment, such as during reconciliation of cash drawers.
  • In one embodiment, the method broadly comprises the steps of electronically retrieving first check data from a point of sale system; imaging the check using an imaging device to capture second check data; comparing the first check data and the second check data to confirm that they are substantially identical; determining whether the check is eligible for automated processing; and, if the check is eligible for automated processing, adding the image of the check to an electronic file for subsequent transmission of the check data to a financial institution.
  • In various embodiments, the present invention may further include one or more of the following additional features. The check data may include magnetic ink character recognition line data. The check data may include a routing number, an account number, a check serial number, and a dollar amount. The method may include the additional step of receiving from the financial institution an electronic acknowledgement of receipt of the check data. The method may include the additional step of allowing for scheduling automatic resubmission of a returned check, wherein automatic resubmission may occur after a specified number of days or may occur at a specified time of the month. The method may include the additional steps of maintaining an electronic database of the check data, and allowing for accessing and searching the electronic database for particular check data via an electronic network.
  • The method may be implemented electronically by a computer program comprising one or more code segments stored on a computer-readable medium and executable by a computing device.
  • These and other features of the present invention are described in greater detail below in the section titled DETAILED DESCRIPTION.
  • BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWING FIGURES
  • The present invention is described herein with reference to the following drawing FIGURE:
  • FIG. 1 is a flowchart of steps involved in practicing the method of the present invention.
  • GLOSSARY
  • The present invention is described herein using the following acronyms:
  • ACH “automated clearing house”.
    BOC “back office conversion”.
    IRD “image replacement document”.
    MICR “magnetic ink character recognition”.
  • NACHA “National Automated Clearing House Association”.
  • POP “point of purchase”.
    POS “point of sale”.
  • DETAILED DESCRIPTION
  • With reference to the drawing FIGURE, a method and computer program are herein described, shown, and otherwise disclosed in accordance with various embodiments, including a preferred embodiment, of the present invention. Broadly, the present invention concerns a method and a computer program stored on a computer readable medium for facilitating back office check conversion in a retail establishment, such as during reconciliation of cash drawers.
  • The “Check Clearing for the 21st Century Act”, or “Check 21”, encourages financial institutions to exchange digital images of checks rather than the original paper checks. The Act also gives substitute checks, called image replacement documents (IRDs), printed from these digital images the same legal status as the original paper checks, so that financial institutions unwilling to accept digital images receive IRDs instead. Among other advantages, this will save significant time and money spent processing paper checks; at one point, for example, it cost the Federal Reserve 4.5 cents to process a paper check, but it costs only 1.3 cents to process an automated clearing house (ACH) payment. The ACH network is a nationwide system for electronically transferring funds, and allows participating financial institutions to quickly and efficiently clear electronic payments.
  • Back office conversion (BOC) allows retailers to convert paper checks to ACH entries in the back office environment rather than at the point of sale (POS) terminal, thereby providing the benefits of reduced cost and risk without prolonging tender time or requiring costly hardware at every POS terminal. Instead of encoding checks for subsequent physical deposit, the checks are imaged for electronic presentment to the bank.
  • Referring to FIG. 1, in one embodiment, the method of the present invention may be practiced during reconciliation of cash drawers. For each check, a computer program for managing cash drawers, such as the VeriBalance™ program by Balance Innovations, LLC, retrieves magnetic ink character recognition (MICR) data, including the routing number, account number, check serial number, and dollar amount, from the POS system, as shown in box 100. The paper check is imaged by back office personnel using an imaging/scanning device to independently capture the MICR data, as shown in box 102. In an alternative embodiment, the check is imaged by the cashier using an imaging/scanning device at the POS terminal. The MICR data from the POS terminal is compared with the MICR data independently generated by the imaging operation, as shown in box 104. Additionally, the courtesy and legal dollar amounts shown on the check may be compared with the POS dollar amount; CAR-LAR (“Courtesy Amount Recognition—Legal Amount Recognition”) software is available to facilitate this particular comparison. Relatedly, where POS data is not available for comparison with the imaged data, the CAR-LAR software may be used to determine whether the image is of sufficient quality for use.
  • If the two data sets differ, the back office personnel are notified. Based upon the confirmed MICR data, a determination is made as to whether the check is eligible for processing, using, for example, ACH, Check 21, image exchange, or other processing, or whether an IRD needs to be sent to deposit the check because the check does not meet NACHA guidelines for BOC conversion, as shown in box 106. More specifically, only consumer checks can be processed through BOC ACH; ineligible checks include checks drawn on business accounts, third-party checks, demand drafts without signatures, credit card checks, bank drafts (i.e., money orders, certified checks, and traveler's checks), government checks, and checks not payable in U.S. currency. If the check is eligible, it is added to a BOC file for subsequent transmittal to the bank. Thereafter, the retailer receives a settlement report to verify deposits and returns.
  • It will be appreciated that occasionally checks are returned as being non-payable for some reason, often because there are insufficient funds in the check writer's account to cover the amount of the check. In one embodiment of the present invention, the retailer can schedule automatic resubmission of the returned checks after a specified number of days, e.g., ten days, after the check is returned or at a specified time each month, e.g., the first or the fifteenth day of the month, as shown in box 108. It will be appreciated that expedited re-presentment can significantly reduce losses from returned checks. This feature is further facilitated by the fact that checks processed using BOC are generally returned in two to four days, while paper checks processed conventionally are generally not returned for seven to ten days. In one embodiment, if, after resubmission, the check is collected, then a separate transaction is initiated to collect the fee the retailer charges for returned checks.
  • It will also be appreciated that occasionally customers dispute check charges. In one embodiment, a database of the check images is maintained locally by the retailer, while, in another embodiment, the database is maintained remotely by a third-party for the benefit of the retailer. Advantages of the latter embodiment include storage capacity advantages, efficiencies of scale advantages, and security advantages. In one implementation, the retailer can access the database via a secure network portal using encrypted SQL. The retailer can search the database by a relevant search criterion, such as amount, account, store, or date, as shown in box 110. In addition to quickly and easily identifying and providing check data for addressing disputes, the database also allows for destroying the original paper checks after a specified period of time while still maintaining the relevant check data. Similarly, electronic entries in the database can be automatically deleted after a specified period of time, which, in one implementation, may be specified by each store.
  • Thus, it will be appreciated that the present invention can reduce check processing costs, including check clearing fees and surcharges for special handling of, e.g., unencoded or otherwise rejected checks; accelerate access to payments (one to two days rather than three to four or more days) and thereby reduce float costs; and reduce losses though an expedited electronic process for handling returned checks. Additionally, the present invention can reduce courier costs associated with transporting paper checks to banks, and some labor costs associated with processing and handling paper checks.
  • The above-described method can be implemented electronically by a computer program comprising one or more code segments stored on a computer-readable medium and executable by a computing device.
  • Although the invention has been disclosed with reference to various particular embodiments, it is understood that equivalents may be employed and substitutions made herein without departing from the scope of the invention.

Claims (32)

1. A method of facilitating back office check conversion in a retail establishment, the method comprising the steps of:
electronically retrieving first check data from a point of sale system;
imaging the check using an imaging device to capture second check data;
comparing the first check data and the second check data to confirm that they are substantially identical;
determining whether the check is eligible for automated processing; and
if the check is eligible for automated processing, adding the image of the check to an electronic file for subsequent transmission of the check data to a financial institution.
2. The method as set forth in claim 1, wherein the check data includes magnetic ink character recognition line data.
3. The method as set forth in claim 1, wherein the check data includes a routing number, an account number, a check serial number, and a dollar amount.
4. The method as set forth in claim 1, further including the step of receiving from the financial institution an electronic acknowledgement of receipt of the check data.
5. The method as set forth in claim 1, further including the step of allowing for scheduling automatic resubmission of a returned check.
6. The method as set forth in claim 5, wherein automatic resubmission occurs after a specified number of days.
7. The method as set forth in claim 5, wherein automatic resubmission occurs at a specified time of the month.
8. The method as set forth in claim 1, further including the steps of—
maintaining an electronic database of the check data; and
allowing for accessing and searching the electronic database for particular check data via an electronic network.
9. A method of facilitating back office check conversion in a retail establishment, the method comprising the steps of:
electronically retrieving first check data from a point of sale system;
imaging the check using an imaging device to capture second check data,
wherein the first check data and the second check data both include magnetic ink character recognition line data including a routing number, an account number, a check serial number, and a dollar amount;
comparing the first check data and the second check data to confirm that they are substantially identical;
determining whether the check is eligible for automated processing;
if the check is eligible for automated processing, adding the image of the check to an electronic file for subsequent transmission of the check data to a financial institution;
receiving from the financial institution an electronic acknowledgement of receipt of the check data;
maintaining a database of the check data at a remote location; and
allowing for accessing and searching the database for particular check data via an electronic network.
10. The method as set forth in claim 9, further including the step of allowing for scheduling automatic resubmission of a returned check.
11. The method as set forth in claim 10, wherein automatic resubmission occurs after a specified number of days.
12. The method as set forth in claim 10, wherein automatic resubmission occurs at a specified time of the month.
13. A method of facilitating back office check conversion in a retail establishment, the method comprising the steps of:
electronically retrieving first check data from a point of sale system;
imaging the check using an imaging device to capture second check data,
wherein the first check data and the second check data both include magnetic ink character recognition line data including a routing number, an account number, a check serial number, and a dollar amount;
comparing the first check data and the second check data to confirm that they are substantially identical;
determining whether the check is eligible for automated processing;
if the check is eligible for automated processing, adding the image of the check to an electronic file for subsequent transmission of the check data to a financial institution;
if the check is returned, allowing for scheduling automatic resubmission of the returned check to the financial institution;
maintaining a database of the check data at a remote location; and
allowing for accessing and searching the database for particular check data via an electronic network.
14. The method as set forth in claim 13, wherein automatic resubmission occurs after a specified number of days.
15. The method as set forth in claim 13, wherein automatic resubmission occurs at a specified time of the month.
16. The method as set forth in claim 13, further including the step of receiving from the financial institution an electronic acknowledgement of receipt of the check data.
17. A computer program for facilitating back office check conversion in a retail establishment, with the computer program being stored on a computer-readable medium and executable by a computing device, the computer program comprising:
a code segment operable to electronically retrieve first check data from a point of sale system;
a code segment operable to receive a captured image of the check containing second check data;
a code segment operable to compare the first check data and the second check data to confirm that they are substantially identical;
a code segment operable to determine whether the check is eligible for automated processing; and
a code segment operable to add the image of the check to an electronic file for subsequent transmission of the check data to a financial institution, if the check is eligible for automated processing,
18. The computer program as set forth in claim 17, wherein the check data includes magnetic ink character recognition line data.
19. The computer program as set forth in claim 17, wherein the check data includes a routing number, an account number, a check serial number, and a dollar amount.
20. The computer program as set forth in claim 17, further including a code segment operable to receive from the financial institution an electronic acknowledgement of receipt of the check data.
21. The computer program as set forth in claim 17, further including a code segment operable to allow for scheduling automatic resubmission of a returned check.
22. The computer program as set forth in claim 21, wherein automatic resubmission occurs after a specified number of days.
23. The computer program as set forth in claim 21, wherein automatic resubmission occurs at a specified time of the month.
24. The computer program as set forth in claim 1, further including a code segment operable to allow for accessing and searching an electronic database containing the check data for particular check data via an electronic network.
25. A computer-readable medium encoded with a computer program for facilitating back office check conversion in a retail establishment, wherein the computer program is executable by a computing device, the computer program comprising:
a code segment operable to electronically retrieve first check data from a point of sale system;
a code segment operable to receive a captured image of the check containing second check data;
a code segment operable to compare the first check data and the second check data to confirm that they are substantially identical;
a code segment operable to determine whether the check is eligible for automated processing; and
a code segment operable to add the image of the check to an electronic file for subsequent transmission of the check data to a financial institution, if the check is eligible for automated processing,
26. The computer-readable medium as set forth in claim 25, wherein the check data includes magnetic ink character recognition line data.
27. The computer-readable medium as set forth in claim 25, wherein the check data includes a routing number, an account number, a check serial number, and a dollar amount.
28. The computer-readable medium as set forth in claim 25, wherein the computer program further includes a code segment operable to receive from the financial institution an electronic acknowledgement of receipt of the check data.
29. The computer-readable medium as set forth in claim 25, wherein the computer program further includes a code segment operable to allow for scheduling automatic resubmission of a returned check.
30. The computer-readable medium as set forth in claim 29, wherein automatic resubmission occurs after a specified number of days.
31. The computer-readable medium as set forth in claim 29, wherein automatic resubmission occurs at a specified time of the month.
32. The computer-readable medium as set forth in claim 25, wherein the computer program further includes a code segment operable to allow for accessing and searching an electronic database containing the check data for particular check data via an electronic network.
US11/971,000 2007-01-08 2008-01-08 Method and computer program for back office check conversion Abandoned US20090018860A1 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US11/971,000 US20090018860A1 (en) 2007-01-08 2008-01-08 Method and computer program for back office check conversion

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US88385407P 2007-01-08 2007-01-08
US11/971,000 US20090018860A1 (en) 2007-01-08 2008-01-08 Method and computer program for back office check conversion

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US20090018860A1 true US20090018860A1 (en) 2009-01-15

Family

ID=40253881

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US11/971,000 Abandoned US20090018860A1 (en) 2007-01-08 2008-01-08 Method and computer program for back office check conversion

Country Status (1)

Country Link
US (1) US20090018860A1 (en)

Cited By (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20090182665A1 (en) * 2006-01-30 2009-07-16 Reid Scott R System and method for processing checks and check transactions
US8660957B2 (en) 2006-01-30 2014-02-25 Solutran Control features in a system and method for processing checks and check transactions
GB2510156B (en) * 2013-01-25 2016-09-21 Validsoft Uk Ltd Method for operating a remote financial tranaction system
US10552861B2 (en) 2013-02-11 2020-02-04 Solutran, Inc. Dual redemption path with shared benefits system and method
US10558997B2 (en) 2013-02-11 2020-02-11 Solutran, Inc. Server-based product substantiation with local filtering system and method

Citations (8)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5917931A (en) * 1994-07-27 1999-06-29 Ontrack Management Systems, Inc. Expenditure tracking check
US5940844A (en) * 1994-11-18 1999-08-17 The Chase Manhattan Bank, Na Method and apparatus for displaying electronic image of a check
US5987439A (en) * 1997-05-30 1999-11-16 Capital Security Systems, Inc. Automated banking system for making change on a card or user account
US20050035193A1 (en) * 1997-05-30 2005-02-17 Capital Security Systems, Inc. Automated document cashing system
US20050071283A1 (en) * 2000-05-25 2005-03-31 Randle William M. Quality assured secure and coordinated transmission of separate image and data records representing a transaction
US20060242063A1 (en) * 2005-04-26 2006-10-26 Peterson David L Remote check deposit
US20060249567A1 (en) * 2005-02-10 2006-11-09 Byrne Michael D Method and apparatus for accepting check deposits via the Internet using browser-based technology
US20070058851A1 (en) * 2005-09-12 2007-03-15 Pitney Bowes Incorporated Confirming cancellation of truncated checks

Patent Citations (8)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5917931A (en) * 1994-07-27 1999-06-29 Ontrack Management Systems, Inc. Expenditure tracking check
US5940844A (en) * 1994-11-18 1999-08-17 The Chase Manhattan Bank, Na Method and apparatus for displaying electronic image of a check
US5987439A (en) * 1997-05-30 1999-11-16 Capital Security Systems, Inc. Automated banking system for making change on a card or user account
US20050035193A1 (en) * 1997-05-30 2005-02-17 Capital Security Systems, Inc. Automated document cashing system
US20050071283A1 (en) * 2000-05-25 2005-03-31 Randle William M. Quality assured secure and coordinated transmission of separate image and data records representing a transaction
US20060249567A1 (en) * 2005-02-10 2006-11-09 Byrne Michael D Method and apparatus for accepting check deposits via the Internet using browser-based technology
US20060242063A1 (en) * 2005-04-26 2006-10-26 Peterson David L Remote check deposit
US20070058851A1 (en) * 2005-09-12 2007-03-15 Pitney Bowes Incorporated Confirming cancellation of truncated checks

Cited By (12)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20090182665A1 (en) * 2006-01-30 2009-07-16 Reid Scott R System and method for processing checks and check transactions
US8126808B2 (en) * 2006-01-30 2012-02-28 Reid Scott R System and method for processing checks and check transactions
US8589301B2 (en) 2006-01-30 2013-11-19 Solutran System and method for processing checks and check transactions
US8660957B2 (en) 2006-01-30 2014-02-25 Solutran Control features in a system and method for processing checks and check transactions
GB2510156B (en) * 2013-01-25 2016-09-21 Validsoft Uk Ltd Method for operating a remote financial tranaction system
US10552861B2 (en) 2013-02-11 2020-02-04 Solutran, Inc. Dual redemption path with shared benefits system and method
US10558997B2 (en) 2013-02-11 2020-02-11 Solutran, Inc. Server-based product substantiation with local filtering system and method
US10685369B2 (en) 2013-02-11 2020-06-16 Solutran, Inc. Server-based product substantiation with local filtering system and method
US11004104B2 (en) 2013-02-11 2021-05-11 Solutran, Inc. Dual redemption path with shared benefits system and method
US11004105B2 (en) 2013-02-11 2021-05-11 Solutran, Inc. Dual redemption path with shared benefits system and method
US11315141B2 (en) 2013-02-11 2022-04-26 Solutran, LLC Server-based product substantiation with local filtering system and method
US11468469B2 (en) 2013-02-11 2022-10-11 Solutran, Inc. Server-based product substantiation with local filtering system and method

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US8311945B2 (en) System and method for processing checks and check transactions
US8396798B2 (en) Method and system for facilitating network transaction processing
US8165381B1 (en) Method and system for transaction decision making
US8583526B2 (en) System and method for remote deposit capture
US7885451B1 (en) Systems and methods for displaying negotiable instruments derived from various sources
US8301567B2 (en) System and method for processing checks and check transactions with thresholds for adjustments to ACH transactions
US8126808B2 (en) System and method for processing checks and check transactions
US8799147B1 (en) Systems and methods for remote deposit of negotiable instruments with non-payee institutions
US8660957B2 (en) Control features in a system and method for processing checks and check transactions
US8027928B1 (en) Dynamic selection of deposit clearing methods based on business rules
US20090018860A1 (en) Method and computer program for back office check conversion
US20100250418A1 (en) Rejected checks envelope and process
Humphrey et al. Cost savings from check 21 electronic payment legislation
US20080000962A1 (en) Method and system for processing image returns
US20090263004A1 (en) Prioritized exception processing system and method with in a check processing system and method
Stavins A comparison of social costs and benefits of paper check presentment and ECP with truncation
US20100250413A1 (en) Method and system for processing and collecting real estate loan payoffs from physically remote locations using ACH and RDC
AU2007216707B2 (en) System and method for processing exception times
Coven Moving to e-payments: Best practices for US middle market companies Part II—Collections
Walsh E-payment: Cheque 21
Oberg What benefits have been delivered in practice by remote deposit and how do you maximise them?
Latham Accounts receivable conversion: Should you do it?
Baskerville What are source documents in accounting
Burnie et al. Twenty‐first‐century check clearing: Are you ready?
Blanco et al. Moving toward 100 per cent electronic cheque processing through ACH and image exchange: Exploring the legal issues.

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AS Assignment

Owner name: BALANCE INNOVATIONS, LLC, KANSAS

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:SIKES, JOEL EDWARD;ANDERSON, GILBERT H.;PALMER, RICHARD WESLEY;AND OTHERS;REEL/FRAME:020524/0411;SIGNING DATES FROM 20080215 TO 20080218

STCB Information on status: application discontinuation

Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION