US20090118627A1 - System and method for evaluating cardiac performance relative to performance of an intrathoracic pressure maneuver - Google Patents
System and method for evaluating cardiac performance relative to performance of an intrathoracic pressure maneuver Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- US20090118627A1 US20090118627A1 US12/349,413 US34941309A US2009118627A1 US 20090118627 A1 US20090118627 A1 US 20090118627A1 US 34941309 A US34941309 A US 34941309A US 2009118627 A1 US2009118627 A1 US 2009118627A1
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- pressure
- cardiac
- maneuver
- performance
- intrathoracic
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Abandoned
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B7/00—Instruments for auscultation
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B5/00—Measuring for diagnostic purposes; Identification of persons
- A61B5/02—Detecting, measuring or recording pulse, heart rate, blood pressure or blood flow; Combined pulse/heart-rate/blood pressure determination; Evaluating a cardiovascular condition not otherwise provided for, e.g. using combinations of techniques provided for in this group with electrocardiography or electroauscultation; Heart catheters for measuring blood pressure
- A61B5/021—Measuring pressure in heart or blood vessels
Definitions
- the present invention relates in general to cardiac performance assessment and, in particular, to a system and method for evaluating cardiac performance relative to performance of an intrathoracic pressure maneuver.
- Heart disease refers to several classes of cardio and cardiovascular disorders and co-morbidities relating to the heart and blood vessels. Generally, heart disease is treatable through medication, lifestyle modification and surgical intervention, which involves repairing damaged organs and tissue. Surgical intervention can also involve implanting active monitoring or therapy delivery devices, such as pacemakers and defibrillators, and passive intervention means.
- Heart disease can lead to heart failure, a potentially fatal condition in which the heart is unable to supply blood sufficient to meet the metabolic demands of a body.
- cardiac performance including potential heart failure, can be detected by measuring changes in arterial blood pressure immediately before, during and immediately after the performance of intrathoracic pressure maneuvers, known as dynamic auscultation, which includes the Valsalva and Müller maneuvers, such as described in Braunwald, “Heart Disease—A Textbook of Cardiovascular Medicine,” pp. 46-52 (5 th ed. 1997), the disclosure of which is incorporated by reference.
- LVEF left ventricular ejection fraction
- LVEDP left ventricular end diastolic pressure
- Circulatory effects and arterial blood pressure profile undergo four well-documented phases during performance of the Valsalva maneuver.
- Phase I initial strain
- Phase II train duration and cessation of breathing
- pulse pressure narrows and systemic systolic pressure decreases.
- Phase III strain discontinuation and resumption of normal breathing
- Phase IV recovery
- diastolic and systolic pressures overshoot and return to pre-maneuver levels.
- the four phases form a characteristic signature and periodic analysis of arterial blood pressure profile or blood pressure, specifically LVEF and LVEDP, throughout each phase can be indicative of the patient's heart failure status.
- LVEF and LVEDP can be measured directly through a catheter distally placed into the left ventricle, but the procedure is invasive and creates unfavorable risks.
- Pulmonary artery wedge pressure (PAWP) measured through right heart catheterization, can be used as a surrogate measure for LVEDP, but the procedure is also invasive and risky.
- PAWP Pulmonary artery wedge pressure
- catheterization is impractical in a non-clinical setting.
- chronically implanted cardiac pressure electrodes while less risky, are generally inaccurate and unreliable. Consequently, indirect measurements approximating LVEF and LVEDP are preferable.
- intracardiac impedance is readily measured through cardiac impedance plethysmography and can be used as an indirect measure of LVEF and LVEDP.
- Changes in intracardiac impedance correlate to cardiac dimensional changes, such as described in McKay et al., Instantaneous Measurement of Left and Right Ventricular Stroke Volume and Pressure - Volume relationships with an Impedance Catheter , Circ. 69, No, 4, pp. 703-710 (1984), the disclosure of which is incorporated by reference.
- a profile of LVEDP and LVEF response during performance of the Valsalva maneuver can be obtained indirectly without resorting to invasive direct measurement techniques.
- Known plethysmography techniques for indirectly measuring intracardiac impedance adapt poorly to effective long-term monitoring.
- U.S. Pat. No. 4,548,211 to Marks discloses the use of external admittance impedance plethysmography to measure pulsatile volume and net inflow in a limb or body segment. External electrodes are placed on the skin and a voltage is applied and sensed for use in determining absolute physiologic values of peak-to-peak pulsatile volume and peat net inflow. While instrumental in non-invasively measuring peripheral blood flow dynamics, the Marks device fails to measure or monitor cardiac dimensional changes through intracardiac impedance.
- U.S. Pat. No. 5,788,643 to Feldman discloses a process for monitoring patients with chronic congestive heart failure (CHF) by applying a high frequency current between electrodes placed on the limbs of a patient.
- Current, voltage and phase angle are measured to calculate resistance, reactance, impedance, total body water and extracellular water, which are compared to a baseline for identifying conditions relating to CHF.
- the Feldman process is limited to operating on external peripheral electrodes and fails to measure or monitor cardiac dimensional changes through intracardiac impedance.
- U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,120,442 and 6,238,349 both to Hickey disclose an apparatus and method for non-invasively determining cardiac performance parameters, including systolic time intervals, contractility indices, pulse amplitude ratios while performing the Valsalva maneuver, cardiac output indices, and pulse wave velocity indices.
- a catheter is inserted into the esophagus and a balloon is pressurized at a distal end, positioned adjacent to the aortic arch to sense aortic pressure. The affects of aortic pressure on the balloon are utilized to determine the cardiac performance parameters.
- the Hickey devices while capable of assessing cardiac performance, must be performed in a clinical setting and fails to measure or monitor cardiac dimensional changes through intracardiac impedance.
- U.S. Pat. Nos. 3,776,221 and 5,291,895 both to McIntyre disclose a pressure-sensing device for providing a signal representative of systemic arterial blood pressure before and after performance of the Valsalva maneuver. Specifically, an electrode placed on the skin generates a blood pressure signal and measures changes in amplitude before and after the Valsalva maneuver is performed.
- the McIntyre devices are limited to operating with external skin electrodes and fail to measure or monitor cardiac dimensional changes through intracardiac impedance.
- Intracardiac impedance measures are collected during the induced performance of an intrathoracic pressure maneuver, such as the Valsalva maneuver, using an implantable cardiac device.
- the start of the intrathoracic pressure maneuver is either expressly marked by the patient or implicitly derived by the implantable cardiac device or by an intrathoracic pressure sensing device.
- the collected intracardiac impedance measures are periodically evaluated for determining arterial blood pressure profile.
- the intracardiac impedance measures are correlated to arterial blood pressure and assigned to the respective phases of the Valsalva maneuver, if applicable.
- a arterial blood pressure profile trend determined for each of the phases is evaluated and the overall set of trends is compared to the signature characteristic of the intrathoracic pressure maneuver under consideration.
- a cardiac performance assessment is generated based on the closeness of match to the characteristic signature and a notification is generated if the cardiac performance assessment varies beyond a set of predefined thresholds.
- An embodiment provides a system and method for evaluating cardiac performance relative to performance of an intrathoracic pressure maneuver.
- Blood pressure is indirectly sensed by directly collecting intracardiac impedance measures through an implantable medical device. Cardiac functional changes to the blood pressure are evaluated in response to performance of an intrathoracic pressure maneuver.
- a further embodiment provides a system and method for assessing cardiac performance through transcardiac impedance monitoring.
- Intracardiac impedance measures are directly collected through an implantable medical device.
- the intracardiac impedance measures are correlated to cardiac dimensional measures relative to performance of an intrathoracic pressure maneuver.
- the cardiac dimensional measures are grouped into at least one measures set corresponding to a temporal phase of the intrathoracic pressure maneuver.
- the at least one cardiac dimensional measures set is evaluated against a cardiac dimensional trend for the corresponding intrathoracic pressure maneuver temporal phase to represent cardiac performance.
- FIG. 1 is a schematic diagram showing an implantable medical device monitoring transcardiac impedance, in accordance with a further embodiment of the present invention.
- FIG. 2 is a schematic diagram showing an external medical device assisting in monitoring transcardiac impedance, in accordance with a further embodiment of the present invention.
- FIGS. 3A-C are graphical representations showing, by way of example, averaged arterial blood pressure profiles relative to performance of the Valsalva maneuver in a healthy person, a patient suffering from heart disease and a patient suffering from heart failure.
- FIG. 4 is a graphical representations showing, by way of example, cardiac dimension profiles during diastole and systole, respectively, relative to performance of the Valsalva maneuver in a healthy person, a patient suffering from heart disease hut not significant heart failure and a patient suffering from significant heart failure.
- FIG. 5 is a graphical representations showing, by way of example, stroke volume index profile and left ventricular pressure profile relative to performance of the Valsalva maneuver in a healthy person.
- FIG. 6 is a functional block diagram showing a system for assessing cardiac performance through transcardiac impedance monitoring, in accordance with a further embodiment of the present invention.
- FIG. 7 is a graphical representation showing, by way of example, trend analysis of arterial blood pressure profile.
- FIG. 8 is a graphical representations showing, by way of example, trend analysis of cardiac stroke volume profile.
- FIG. 9 is a flow chart showing a method for assessing cardiac performance through transcardiac impedance monitoring, in accordance with a further embodiment of the present invention.
- FIG. 10 is a flow chart showing a routine for collecting physiological measures for use in the method of FIG. 9 .
- FIG. 11 is a flow chart showing a routine for assessing cardiac performance for use in the method of FIG. 9 .
- FIG. 12 is a flow chart showing a routine for evaluating cardiac stroke volume profile relative to, by way of example, the Valsalva maneuver, for use in the routine of FIG. 11 .
- FIG. 1 is a schematic diagram 100 showing an implantable medical device (IMD) 103 monitoring transcardiac impedance, in accordance with a further embodiment of the present invention.
- the IMD 103 is surgically implanted in the chest or abdomen of a patient and consists generally of a housing 104 and terminal block 105 .
- the IMD 103 is coupled to a set of leads 106 a - b at the terminal block 105 .
- the leads 106 a - b are threaded through a vein and placed into the heart 102 with the distal tips of each lead 106 a - b positioned in direct contact with tissue inside the heart 102 .
- the housing 104 contains a battery 107 , control circuitry 108 , memory 109 , and telemetry circuitry 110 .
- the battery 107 provides a finite power source for the IMD components.
- the control circuitry 108 samples and processes raw data signals and includes signal filters and amplifiers, memory and a microprocessor-based controller, as would be appreciated by one skilled in the art.
- the memory 109 includes a short-term, volatile memory store in which raw physiological signals can be stored as telemetered signals for later retrieval and analysis.
- the telemetry circuitry 110 provides an interface between the IMD 103 external devices (not shown).
- the telemetry circuitry 110 enables operating parameters to be non-invasively programmed into the memory 109 through an external device in telemetric communication with the IMD 103 .
- the telemetry circuitry 110 also allows patient information collected by the IMD 103 and transiently stored in the memory 109 to be sent to the external device for processing and analysis.
- the IMD 103 is in direct electrical communication with the heart 102 through electrodes 111 a - b positioned on the distal tips of each lead 106 a - b .
- the set of leads 106 a - b can include a right ventricular electrode 111 a and a right atrial electrode 111 b .
- the right ventricular electrode 111 a is preferably placed in the right ventricular apex 112 of the heart 102 and the right atrial electrode 111 b is preferably placed in the right atrial chamber 113 of the heart 102 .
- the electrodes 111 a - b enable the IMD 103 to directly collect raw physiological measures, preferably through millivolt measurements.
- Other configurations and arrangements of leads and electrodes, including the use of single and multiple leads arrays and single and multiple electrodes, can be used, as would be recognized by one skilled in the art.
- the IMD 103 can be implemented as part of cardiac pacemakers used for managing bradycardia, implantable cardioverter defibrillators (IMDs) used for treating tachycardia, and other types of implantable cardiovascular monitors and therapeutic devices used for monitoring and treating heart failure, structural problems of the heart, such as congestive heart failure, rhythm problems, and other heart conditions, as would be appreciated by one skilled in the art.
- cardiac pacemakers suitable for use in the described embodiment include the Pulsar Max II, Discovery, and Discovery II pacing systems, sold by Guidant Corporation, St. Paul, Minn.
- An example of an IMD suitable for use in the described embodiment includes the Contak Renewal cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillator, also sold by Guidant Corporation, St. Paul, Minn.
- the telemetered signals stored in the memory 109 are retrieved.
- a programmer (not shown) can be used to retrieve the telemetered signals.
- any form of programmer, interrogator, recorder, monitor, or telemetered signals transceiver suitable for communicating with IMD 103 could be used, as would be appreciated by one skilled in the art.
- a server, personal computer or digital data processor could be interfaced to the IMD 103 , either directly or via a telemetered signals transceiver configured to communicate with the implantable medical device 103 .
- the programmer communicates with the IMD 103 via radio frequency signals exchanged through a wand placed over the location of the IMD 103 .
- Programming or interrogating instructions are sent to the IMD 103 and the stored telemetered signals are downloaded into the programmer.
- the telemetered signals can be sent via a network, such as the Internet, to a server (not shown), which periodically receives and stores the telemetered signals in a database, as further described below with reference to FIG. 6 .
- An example of a programmer suitable for use in the present invention is the Model 2901 Programmer Recorder Monitor, manufactured by Guidant Corporation, Indianapolis, Ind., which includes the capability to store retrieved telemetered signals on a proprietary removable floppy diskette.
- the telemetered signals could later be electronically transferred using a personal computer or similar processing device, as would be appreciated by one skilled in the art.
- the stored telemetered signals could be retrieved from the IMD 103 and electronically transferred to a network using a combination of a remote external programmer and analyzer and a remote telephonic communicator, such as described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,113,869, the disclosure of which is incorporated by reference.
- the stored telemetered signals could be retrieved and remotely downloaded to a server using a world-wide patient location and data telemetry system, such as described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,752,976, the disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference.
- FIG. 2 is a schematic diagram 120 showing an external medical device 122 assisting in monitoring transcardiac impedance, in accordance with a further embodiment of the present invention.
- the external medical device 122 facilitates transcardiac impedance monitoring by ensuring consistent intrathoracic pressure, particularly when thoracic pressure is elevated when induced, for instance, by performance of the Valsalva maneuver.
- the external medical device 122 includes a mouthpiece 123 functionally connected to a pressure monitor 124 via a hose 125 .
- the pressure monitor 124 defines a confined volume into which the patient 121 blows.
- a pressure regulating device 126 releases expired air.
- the pressure monitor 124 provides a pressure reading representative of the pressure in the confined volume.
- the pressure monitor 124 can also provide recording functions that record the pressure levels during performance of a transcardiac maneuver by a patient 121 .
- a thoracic pressure electrode such as described in U.S. Pat. No. 6,132,384, the disclosure of which is incorporated by reference, can be combined with the IMD 103 to provide a fully implanted solution.
- the use of an implanted thoracic pressure electrode enables measurements during normal activities of daily living that produce elevated thoracic pressure similar to an induced performance of the Valsalva maneuver.
- intracardiac impedance is recorded by the IMD 103 on a continuous basis. After the cardiac response period ends, the recorded intracardiac impedance data can either be downloaded to an external device (not shown) for further analysis, as further described below with reference to FIG. 11 , or can be analyzed by the IMD 103 .
- FIGS. 3A-C are graphical representations showing, by way of example, averaged arterial blood pressure profiles 130 , 150 , 170 relative to performance of the Valsalva maneuver in a healthy person, a patient suffering from heart disease but not significant heart failure and a patient suffering from significant heart failure, respectively.
- the x-axis 131 , 151 , 171 respectively represent time.
- the y-axis 132 , 152 , 172 respectively indicate arterial pressure (mmHg). Averaged changes in arterial pressure are plotted over time throughout each of the four phases 133 - 136 , 153 - 156 , 173 - 176 of the Valsalva maneuver, respectively.
- the pulsatile arterial blood pressure changes are shown as averaged values and each of the averaged arterial blood pressure profiles 130 , 150 , 170 have respectively been normalized relative to time.
- the Valsalva maneuver involves deep inspiration followed by forced exhalation against a closed glottis for ten to twelve seconds.
- the four phases of the Valsalva maneuver exhibit a characteristic signature for normal healthy people and for patients suffering from heart disease, but not significant heart failure.
- Phase I initial strain, systemic blood pressure undergoes a transient rise as straining commences.
- Phase II strain duration and cessation of breathing, systemic venous return, blood pressure and pulse pressure decrease perceptibly.
- Phase III strain discontinuation and resumption of normal breathing, blood pressure and systemic venous return exhibit abrupt, transient decreases.
- Phase IV recovery, systemic arterial pressure overshoots with reflex bradycardia.
- the response signature is a muted square wave response with a slight elevation in blood pressure during phase III and minimal perceptible changes during Phases I, II and IV.
- Cardiac performance response profile is significantly dependent on left ventricular function, specifically LVEF and mean LVEDP.
- a healthy person with no history of cardiovascular diseases may, for example, be expected to have an LVEF and mean LVEDP of approximately 70% and 14 mmHg, respectively.
- a patient suffering from heart disease but not significant heart failure may, for example, typically be expected to have an LVEF and mean LVEDP of approximately 50% and 20 mmHg, respectively.
- a patient suffering from heart failure may, for example, typically be expected to have an LVEF and mean LVEDP of approximately 30% and 40 mmHg, respectively.
- the graphical representation shows, by way of example, an averaged arterial blood pressure profile 130 relative to performance of the Valsalva maneuver in a healthy person with no history of cardiovascular diseases.
- intrathoracic pressure increases in response to the strain associated with the maneuver, along with a sharp rise 137 in arterial pressure approximately equal to the intrathoracic pressure increase.
- Phase II 134 pulse pressure narrows and arterial pressure undergoes a transient decrease 138 .
- Phase III 135 systolic pressure drops rapidly 139 .
- diastolic and systolic pressures return to pre-maneuver levels 141 following a large overshoot 140 in arterial pressure.
- the graphical representation shows, by way of example, an averaged arterial blood pressure profile 150 relative to performance of the Valsalva maneuver in a patient suffering from heart disease but not significant heart failure.
- Phase I 153 systemic arterial pressure increases only slightly 157 .
- Phase II 154 systemic arterial pressure 158 increases approximately equal to the increase in intrathoracic pressure followed by a narrowing of pulse pressure and arterial pressure decrease 159 .
- Phase III 155 systolic pressure drops rapidly 160 .
- diastolic and systolic pressures return to pre-maneuver levels 161 without overshoot.
- the graphical representation shows, by way of example, an averaged arterial blood pressure profile 170 relative to performance of the Valsalva maneuver in a patient suffering from heart failure.
- Phase I 173 almost no appreciable increase in systemic arterial pressure occurs 177 .
- Phase II 174 pulse pressure and systemic systolic pressure remain at approximately the same elevated level 178 throughout the phase.
- Phase III 175 systolic pressure decreases to approximately the same level as in Phase I 173 .
- Phase IV 176 diastolic and systolic pressures return to their pre-maneuver levels 180 almost immediately upon cessation of strain.
- FIG. 4 is a graphical representations showing, by way of example, cardiac dimension profiles 182 a , 182 b , during diastole and systole, respectively, relative to performance of the Valsalva maneuver in a healthy person, a patient suffering from heart disease but not significant heart failure and a patient suffering from significant heart failure.
- the x-axis represents time.
- the y-axis indicates average dimensional change (%). Averaged changes in dimension are plotted over time throughout each of the four phases 183 a - 186 a , 183 b - 186 b of the Valsalva maneuver.
- Phase I 183 a , 183 b cardiac dimension decreases in response to the strain associated with the maneuver for a healthy person with no history of cardiovascular diseases.
- Phase II 184 a , 184 b cardiac dimension reduces rapidly.
- Phase III 185 a , 185 b cardiac dimension increases rapidly.
- Phase IV 186 a , 186 b cardiac dimension pressures return to pre-maneuver levels.
- the average cardiac dimensional change for a patient suffering from heart disease but not significant heart failure 182 ab , 182 bb is essentially the same as the changes observed for a healthy person with no history of cardiovascular diseases.
- the average cardiac dimensional change for a patient suffering from significant heart failure reflects only slight changes during each of the four phases of a Valsalva maneuver.
- FIG. 5 is a graphical representations showing, by way of example, stroke volume index profile 188 a and left ventricular pressure profile 188 b relative to performance of the Valsalva maneuver in a healthy person.
- the x-axis represents time.
- the left hand y-axis indicates stroke volume index (ml/M 2 ) and the right hand y-axis indicates LV pressure. Changes in stroke volume index and left ventricular pressure are plotted over time throughout each of the four phases 187 a , 187 b , 187 c and 187 d of a Valsalva maneuver.
- Phase I 187 a the stroke volume index decreases slightly and left ventricular systolic and diastolic pressures increase slightly.
- Phase II 187 b the stroke volume index and left ventricular and diastolic systolic pressures decrease significantly.
- Phase III 187 c the stroke volume index begins an increase towards pre-maneuver levels, but the left ventricular diastolic and systolic pressures remain stable.
- Phase IV 187 d the stroke volume index and left ventricular diastolic and systolic pressures return to pre-maneuver levels.
- Heart disease patient management requires carefully monitoring and evaluation of LVEF and LVEDP.
- an increase in LVEDP can lead to an acute exasperation of heart failure and acute decompensation.
- Changes to LVEDP associated with the acute exasperation of heart failure can occur in a few days, whereas changes to LVEF occur more slowly and are associated with long-term changes.
- effectively assessing cardiac performance requires evaluating LVEF and LVEDP or equivalent values that approximate LVEF and LVEDP changes, such as intracardiac impedance.
- the Müller maneuver is performed either in lieu of or in addition to the Valsalva maneuver.
- the Müller maneuver involves deep inspiration while the nose is held closed and mouth firmly sealed for ten seconds.
- the Müller maneuver exaggerates inspiration effort and augments murmurs and right side cardiac filling sounds.
- FIG. 6 is a functional block diagram showing a system 190 for assessing cardiac performance through transcardiac impedance monitoring, in accordance with a further embodiment of the present invention.
- Each component is a computer program, procedure or process written as source code in a conventional programming language, such as the C++ programming language, and is presented for execution by one or more CPUs as object or byte code in a uniprocessing, distributed or parallelized configuration, as would be appreciated by one skilled in the art.
- the various implementations of the source code and object and byte codes can be held on a computer-readable storage medium or embodied on a transmission medium in a carrier wave.
- the system 190 consists of a server 191 coupled to a database 197 , which provides persistent secondary storage.
- the server 191 consists of three modules: telemetry 192 , database 193 , and analysis 194 .
- the telemetry module 192 communicatively interfaces to the IMD 103 through a logically-formed, non-invasive communication channel, such as provided though induction, static magnetic field coupling, or by related means, as would be appreciated by one skilled in the art.
- the telemetry module 192 facilitates the transferal and exchange of physiological measures 195 and programming parameters 196 between the IMD 103 and the server 191 .
- the physiological measures 195 include raw physiological data regularly collected by the IMD 103 and stored in the memory 109 .
- the programming parameters 196 include monitoring and therapy delivery device configuration settings, which are exchanged between the IMD 103 and the server 191 .
- the telemetry module 192 communicates with the telemetry circuitry 110 on the IMD 103 using standard programmer communication protocols, as would be appreciated by one skilled in the art.
- the physiological measures 195 and programming parameters 196 non-exclusively present patient information recorded on a per heartbeat, binned average or derived basis and relating to atrial electrical activity, ventricular electrical activity, minute ventilation, patient activity score, cardiac output score, mixed venous oxygenation score, cardiovascular pressure measures, time of day, the number and types of interventions made, and the relative success of any interventions, plus the status of the batteries and programmed settings.
- the database module 193 maintains information stored in the database 197 as structured records for facilitating efficient storage and retrieval.
- the database module 193 stores the physiological measures 195 and programming parameters 196 exchanged with the IMD 103 in the database 197 .
- the database 197 stores the physiological measures 195 as derived measures, which include, non-exclusively, impedance measures 198 , cardiac dimensional measures 199 , LVEF measures 200 , and LVEDP measures 201 . Other raw and derived measures can be stored in the database 197 , as would be recognized by one skilled in the art.
- the programming parameters 196 are maintained in the database as programming values 202 .
- patient profile information 203 is maintained in the database 197 .
- the analysis module 194 derives and evaluates the physiological data maintained in the database 197 .
- the physiological measures 195 retrieved from the IMD 103 are converted and derived into the impedance measures 198 , cardiac dimensional measures 199 , LVEF measures 200 , and LVEDP 201 , as would be appreciated by one skilled in the art.
- the impedance measures 198 are analyzed and evaluated to determine an overall arterial blood pressure profile, which is compared to predefined thresholds 204 for assessing cardiac performance relative to the performance of an intrathoracic pressure maneuver, as further described below with reference to FIG. 11 .
- the analysis module 194 generates a cardiac performance assessment 205 , which identifies trends indicating cardiovascular disease and, in particular, heart failure, absence, onset, progression, regression, and status quo.
- the cardiac performance assessment 205 can be further evaluated to determine whether medical intervention is necessary.
- the functions of the server 191 are performed by the IMD 103 , which directly generates the cardiac performance assessment 205 , for retrieval by an external device.
- FIG. 7 is a graphical representation showing, by way of example, trend analysis 210 of arterial blood pressure profile 213 .
- the x-axis 211 represents time.
- the y-axis 212 indicates arterial pressure in mmHg. Averaged changes in arterial pressure are plotted over time throughout each of the four phases 214 - 217 of the Valsalva maneuver.
- the arterial blood pressure profile 213 models the characteristic signature exhibited during each phase of the Valsalva maneuver.
- Phase I 214 the arterial pressure is evaluated for an increasing trend 218 .
- Phase II 215 the arterial pressure is evaluated for a transient decreasing trend 219 .
- Phase III 216 the arterial pressure is evaluated for a significantly decreasing trend 220 .
- Phase VI 217 the arterial pressure is evaluated for a steeply increasing trend 221 , followed by an overshooting trend 222 , followed by a decreasing trend 223 with resumption of normal arterial pressure.
- pulsatile volume and heart rate can also be evaluated for trends, as would be recognized by one skilled in the art.
- FIG. 8 is a graphical representation showing, by way of example, trend analysis 213 of cardiac stroke volume profile.
- the x-axis represents time.
- the y-axis indicates stroke volume index in ml/M 2 . Averaged changes in stroke volume index are plotted over time throughout each of four phases 214 , 215 , 216 , 217 of a Valsalva maneuver.
- FIG. 9 is a flow chart showing a method 225 for assessing cardiac performance through transcardiac impedance monitoring, in accordance with a further embodiment of the present invention.
- the method 225 is described as a sequence of process operations or steps, which can be executed, for instance, by a server 191 (shown in FIG. 6 ).
- the method 225 can be executed directly by the IMD 103 or related means, which generates a cardiac performance assessment 205 for retrieval by an external device.
- the method 225 preferably executes as a continuous processing loop 226 - 229 .
- the physiological measures 195 are retrieved from the IMD 103 and stored in the database 197 , as further described below with reference to FIG. 10 .
- Cardiac performance is then assessed (block 228 ), as further described below with reference to FIG. 11 .
- Processing continues (block 229 ), until the method exits or terminates.
- FIG. 10 is a flow chart showing a routine 230 for collecting physiological measures for use in the method 225 of FIG. 9 .
- the purpose of this routine is to regularly interface to the IMD 103 , retrieve the physiological measures 195 and programming parameters 196 , and store the retrieved physiological measures 195 and programming parameters 196 in the database 197 .
- the routine begins initially by interfacing to the IMD 103 (block 231 ), using, for instance, inductive or static magnetic means, as would be appreciated by one skilled in the art.
- Raw physiological measures 195 are retrieved from the IMD 103 (block 232 ).
- the raw physiological measures 195 are converted and derived into impedance measures 198 , cardiac dimensional measures 199 , LVEF measures 200 , and LVEDP measures 201 (block 233 ).
- the physiological measures are stored in the database 197 (block 234 ). If further physiological measures 195 or programming parameters 196 require exchange with the IMD 103 (block 235 ), processing continues. Otherwise, the interface to the IMD 103 is closed (block 236 ), the routine returns.
- FIG. 11 is a flow chart showing a routine 240 for assessing cardiac performance for use in the method 225 of FIG. 9 .
- the purpose of this routine is to periodically assess cardiac performance through an analysis of the cardiac stroke volume profile trends 224 (shown in FIG. 8 ).
- physiological measures including impedance measures 198 , cardiac dimensional measures 199 , LVEF measures 200 , and LVEDP measures 201 , are retrieved from the database 197 (shown in FIG. 6 ) (block 241 ).
- the start of the intrathoracic pressure maneuver under consideration is determined (block 242 ).
- the start of the intrathoracic pressure maneuver is determined by retrieving an explicit marker recorded by the patient 100 or by indirect means based upon an analysis of the retrieved physiological measures, as would be appreciated by one skilled in the art.
- the cardiac stroke volume profile 224 is evaluated to form a cardiac performance assessment 205 (block 243 ), further described below with reference to FIG. 12 . If the cardiac performance assessment 205 exceeds the predefined threshold 204 (block 244 ), a notification is generated (block 245 ).
- the notification takes the form of generating an alert for review and possible action by healthcare providers and can include generating appropriate feedback to the patient 100 , such as described in commonly-assigned U.S. Pat. No. 6,203,495, the disclosure of which is incorporated by reference.
- FIG. 12 is a flow chart showing a routine 250 for evaluating cardiac stroke volume profile 224 relative to, by way of example, the Valsalva maneuver, for use in the routine 240 of FIG. 11 .
- the purpose of this routine is to generate a cardiac performance assessment 205 by forming a trend analysis of the retrieved physiological measures based on the phases of the Valsalva maneuver.
- the trend analysis proceeds in four groups of steps (blocks 251 - 253 , 254 - 256 , 257 - 259 , 260 - 268 , respectively), which track each of the four phases of the Valsalva maneuver.
- steps (blocks 251 - 253 , 254 - 256 , 257 - 259 , 260 - 268 , respectively), which track each of the four phases of the Valsalva maneuver.
- the cardiac stroke volume profile 224 is in Phase I (block 251 ) and an increase in arterial pressure is apparent (block 252 )
- the increase is marked (block 253 ).
- the cardiac stroke volume profile 224 is in Phase II (block 254 ) and a transient decrease in arterial pressure is apparent (block 255 )
- the transient decrease is marked (block 256 ).
- the cardiac stroke volume profile 224 is in Phase III (block 256 ) and a significant decrease in arterial pressure is apparent (block 258 ), the significant decrease is marked (block 259 ).
- the cardiac stroke volume profile 224 is in Phase VI (block 260 ) four conditions are evaluated. If an increase in arterial pressure is apparent (block 261 ), the increase is marked (block 262 ). If the increase in arterial pressure is followed by an overshoot (block 263 ), the overshoot is marked (block 264 ). For the Valsalva maneuver, the overshoot is the strongest trend indication in the characteristic signature and indicates a healthy, non-heart failure person.
- the impedance measures are correlated to cardiac stroke volume to reflect cardiac dimensional changes, as described above with reference to FIG. 3 .
- the overall cardiac stroke volume profile 224 is determined (block 270 ) to generate a cardiac performance assessment 205 .
- the cardiac performance assessment 205 quantifies the variants between the physiological measures determined during each of the phases against the cardiac stroke volume profile trends 224 e - 224 h .
- the routine returns.
- the cardiac impedance data can be analyzed in several ways.
- a statistical analysis can be performed on impedance data to determine the mean impedance level and standard deviation over the entire response period.
- the mean Z and the standard deviation S z of the impedance data over the response period can be used as a cardiac performance assessment 205 , where:
- a statistical analysis can be performed on different phases of the response period based on the collected impedance data to determine the cardiac performance assessment 205 .
- the mean and standard deviation analysis described above, can be performed on physiological data from Phase IV of the response period relative to the performance of the Valsalva maneuver.
- the analyzed values reflect the amplitude of impedance change during the Valsalva maneuver as the cardiac performance assessment 205 .
- the impedance data can be analyzed for trends by calculating a linear regression over the collected data for Phase IV of the response period, such as described in Seborg et al., “Process Dynamics and Control,” pp. 165-167 (John Wiley & Sons, 1989), the disclosure of which is incorporated by reference.
- a linear regression the response pattern during Phase IV can be fitted into a second-order system response, which is characterized by a transfer function, such as:
- G ⁇ ( s ) K ( ⁇ 1 ⁇ s + 1 ) ⁇ ( ⁇ 2 ⁇ s + 1 )
- ⁇ 1 and ⁇ 2 are derived empirically by linear regression.
- a second order process transfer function can arise upon transforming a second-order differential equation process model that has the general form of:
- G ⁇ ( s ) K ⁇ 2 ⁇ s 2 + 2 ⁇ ⁇ ⁇ ⁇ s + 1
- ⁇ ⁇ 1 + ⁇ 2 2 ⁇ ⁇ 1 ⁇ ⁇ 2
- the resulting response pattern is characterized by the derived value of the damping factor ⁇ according to the following table:
- Phase IV of the Valsalva maneuver exhibits the most noticeable difference in cardiac response for the three groups of individuals described above with reference to FIGS. 3A-C and 4 , that is, a healthy person, a patient suffering from heart disease and a patient suffering from heart failure.
- the response pattern from the healthy person group closely resembles an under-damped second-order response, which is characterized by a damping factor between zero and one.
- the response pattern from the heart disease patient group closely resembles a critically-damped or under-damped second-order response, which is characterized by a damping factor that is equal to or greater than one but not substantially higher than one.
- the response pattern from the heart failure patient group shows no appreciable change, which resembles a severely-over damped system characterized by a large damping factor.
- the damping factor serves as a cardiac performance assessment 205 .
- Other types of statistical analyses can also be performed, as would be recognized by one skilled in the art.
Abstract
A system and method for evaluating cardiac performance relative to performance of an intrathoracic pressure maneuver is described. Blood pressure is indirectly sensed by directly collecting intracardiac impedance measures through an implantable medical device. Cardiac functional changes to the blood pressure are evaluated in response to performance of an intrathoracic pressure maneuver.
Description
- This patent application is a divisional of the U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/782,642, filed Feb. 19, 2004, pending, the disclosure of which is incorporated by reference, and the priority filing date of which is claimed.
- The present invention relates in general to cardiac performance assessment and, in particular, to a system and method for evaluating cardiac performance relative to performance of an intrathoracic pressure maneuver.
- Heart disease refers to several classes of cardio and cardiovascular disorders and co-morbidities relating to the heart and blood vessels. Generally, heart disease is treatable through medication, lifestyle modification and surgical intervention, which involves repairing damaged organs and tissue. Surgical intervention can also involve implanting active monitoring or therapy delivery devices, such as pacemakers and defibrillators, and passive intervention means.
- Heart disease can lead to heart failure, a potentially fatal condition in which the heart is unable to supply blood sufficient to meet the metabolic demands of a body. In a clinical setting, cardiac performance, including potential heart failure, can be detected by measuring changes in arterial blood pressure immediately before, during and immediately after the performance of intrathoracic pressure maneuvers, known as dynamic auscultation, which includes the Valsalva and Müller maneuvers, such as described in Braunwald, “Heart Disease—A Textbook of Cardiovascular Medicine,” pp. 46-52 (5th ed. 1997), the disclosure of which is incorporated by reference.
- In particular, potential heart failure can be effectively and safely detected by evaluating the profile of arterial blood pressure and other cardiac dimensional measures relative to performance of the Valsalva maneuver, which involves forced expiration against a closed glottis for about 10-30 seconds. In a healthy person with no prior history of cardiovascular disease or a patient suffering from a diseased but not failed heart, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and left ventricular end diastolic pressure (LVEDP) change dramatically coincidental to performance of the Valsalva maneuver, whereas LVEF and LVEDP change only slightly in a heart failure patient, as discussed in Hamilton et al., Arterial, Cerebrospinal and Venous Pressure in Man During Cough and Strain, 144 Am. J. of Phys., pp. 42, 42-50 (1944) and Zema et al., Left Ventricular Dysfunction-Bedside Valsalva Maneuver, Br. Heart J., pp. 44:560-569 (1980), the disclosures of which are incorporated by reference.
- Circulatory effects and arterial blood pressure profile undergo four well-documented phases during performance of the Valsalva maneuver. During Phase I (initial strain), systemic arterial pressure increases approximately equal to the increase in intrathoracic pressure. During Phase II (strain duration and cessation of breathing), pulse pressure narrows and systemic systolic pressure decreases. During Phase III (strain discontinuation and resumption of normal breathing), systolic pressure drops rapidly. During Phase IV (recovery), diastolic and systolic pressures overshoot and return to pre-maneuver levels. The four phases form a characteristic signature and periodic analysis of arterial blood pressure profile or blood pressure, specifically LVEF and LVEDP, throughout each phase can be indicative of the patient's heart failure status.
- Regularly obtaining and evaluating LVEF and LVEDP for cardiac performance assessment, however, can be difficult. Direct measurements can be obtained through catheterization and electrodes. LVEF and LVEDP can be measured directly through a catheter distally placed into the left ventricle, but the procedure is invasive and creates unfavorable risks. Pulmonary artery wedge pressure (PAWP), measured through right heart catheterization, can be used as a surrogate measure for LVEDP, but the procedure is also invasive and risky. Moreover, catheterization is impractical in a non-clinical setting. Finally, chronically implanted cardiac pressure electrodes, while less risky, are generally inaccurate and unreliable. Consequently, indirect measurements approximating LVEF and LVEDP are preferable.
- For example, intracardiac impedance is readily measured through cardiac impedance plethysmography and can be used as an indirect measure of LVEF and LVEDP. Changes in intracardiac impedance correlate to cardiac dimensional changes, such as described in McKay et al., Instantaneous Measurement of Left and Right Ventricular Stroke Volume and Pressure-Volume relationships with an Impedance Catheter, Circ. 69, No, 4, pp. 703-710 (1984), the disclosure of which is incorporated by reference. As a result, by measuring intracardiac impedance, a profile of LVEDP and LVEF response during performance of the Valsalva maneuver can be obtained indirectly without resorting to invasive direct measurement techniques. Known plethysmography techniques for indirectly measuring intracardiac impedance, however, adapt poorly to effective long-term monitoring.
- U.S. Pat. No. 4,548,211 to Marks discloses the use of external admittance impedance plethysmography to measure pulsatile volume and net inflow in a limb or body segment. External electrodes are placed on the skin and a voltage is applied and sensed for use in determining absolute physiologic values of peak-to-peak pulsatile volume and peat net inflow. While instrumental in non-invasively measuring peripheral blood flow dynamics, the Marks device fails to measure or monitor cardiac dimensional changes through intracardiac impedance.
- U.S. Pat. No. 5,788,643 to Feldman discloses a process for monitoring patients with chronic congestive heart failure (CHF) by applying a high frequency current between electrodes placed on the limbs of a patient. Current, voltage and phase angle are measured to calculate resistance, reactance, impedance, total body water and extracellular water, which are compared to a baseline for identifying conditions relating to CHF. The Feldman process is limited to operating on external peripheral electrodes and fails to measure or monitor cardiac dimensional changes through intracardiac impedance.
- U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,120,442 and 6,238,349 both to Hickey disclose an apparatus and method for non-invasively determining cardiac performance parameters, including systolic time intervals, contractility indices, pulse amplitude ratios while performing the Valsalva maneuver, cardiac output indices, and pulse wave velocity indices. A catheter is inserted into the esophagus and a balloon is pressurized at a distal end, positioned adjacent to the aortic arch to sense aortic pressure. The affects of aortic pressure on the balloon are utilized to determine the cardiac performance parameters. The Hickey devices, while capable of assessing cardiac performance, must be performed in a clinical setting and fails to measure or monitor cardiac dimensional changes through intracardiac impedance.
- U.S. Pat. Nos. 3,776,221 and 5,291,895 both to McIntyre disclose a pressure-sensing device for providing a signal representative of systemic arterial blood pressure before and after performance of the Valsalva maneuver. Specifically, an electrode placed on the skin generates a blood pressure signal and measures changes in amplitude before and after the Valsalva maneuver is performed. The McIntyre devices are limited to operating with external skin electrodes and fail to measure or monitor cardiac dimensional changes through intracardiac impedance.
- Therefore, there is a need for an approach to assessing cardiac performance by indirectly measuring arterial blood pressure profile through intracardiac impedance relative to performance of intrathoracic pressure maneuvers, such as the Valsalva maneuver. Preferably, such an approach would analyze an intrathoracic pressure maneuver signature in a non-clinical setting on a regular basis for use in automated heart disease patient management.
- A system and method for generating a cardiac performance assessment based on intracardiac impedance is described. Intracardiac impedance measures are collected during the induced performance of an intrathoracic pressure maneuver, such as the Valsalva maneuver, using an implantable cardiac device. The start of the intrathoracic pressure maneuver is either expressly marked by the patient or implicitly derived by the implantable cardiac device or by an intrathoracic pressure sensing device. The collected intracardiac impedance measures are periodically evaluated for determining arterial blood pressure profile. The intracardiac impedance measures are correlated to arterial blood pressure and assigned to the respective phases of the Valsalva maneuver, if applicable. A arterial blood pressure profile trend determined for each of the phases is evaluated and the overall set of trends is compared to the signature characteristic of the intrathoracic pressure maneuver under consideration. A cardiac performance assessment is generated based on the closeness of match to the characteristic signature and a notification is generated if the cardiac performance assessment varies beyond a set of predefined thresholds.
- An embodiment provides a system and method for evaluating cardiac performance relative to performance of an intrathoracic pressure maneuver. Blood pressure is indirectly sensed by directly collecting intracardiac impedance measures through an implantable medical device. Cardiac functional changes to the blood pressure are evaluated in response to performance of an intrathoracic pressure maneuver.
- A further embodiment provides a system and method for assessing cardiac performance through transcardiac impedance monitoring. Intracardiac impedance measures are directly collected through an implantable medical device. The intracardiac impedance measures are correlated to cardiac dimensional measures relative to performance of an intrathoracic pressure maneuver. The cardiac dimensional measures are grouped into at least one measures set corresponding to a temporal phase of the intrathoracic pressure maneuver. The at least one cardiac dimensional measures set is evaluated against a cardiac dimensional trend for the corresponding intrathoracic pressure maneuver temporal phase to represent cardiac performance.
- Still other embodiments of the present invention will become readily apparent to those skilled in the art from the following detailed description, wherein are described embodiments of the invention by way of illustrating the best mode contemplated for carrying out the invention. As will be realized, the invention is capable of other and different embodiments and its several details are capable of modifications in various obvious respects, all without departing from the spirit and the scope of the present invention. Accordingly, the drawings and detailed description are to be regarded as illustrative in nature and not as restrictive.
-
FIG. 1 is a schematic diagram showing an implantable medical device monitoring transcardiac impedance, in accordance with a further embodiment of the present invention. -
FIG. 2 is a schematic diagram showing an external medical device assisting in monitoring transcardiac impedance, in accordance with a further embodiment of the present invention. -
FIGS. 3A-C are graphical representations showing, by way of example, averaged arterial blood pressure profiles relative to performance of the Valsalva maneuver in a healthy person, a patient suffering from heart disease and a patient suffering from heart failure. -
FIG. 4 is a graphical representations showing, by way of example, cardiac dimension profiles during diastole and systole, respectively, relative to performance of the Valsalva maneuver in a healthy person, a patient suffering from heart disease hut not significant heart failure and a patient suffering from significant heart failure. -
FIG. 5 is a graphical representations showing, by way of example, stroke volume index profile and left ventricular pressure profile relative to performance of the Valsalva maneuver in a healthy person. -
FIG. 6 is a functional block diagram showing a system for assessing cardiac performance through transcardiac impedance monitoring, in accordance with a further embodiment of the present invention. -
FIG. 7 is a graphical representation showing, by way of example, trend analysis of arterial blood pressure profile. -
FIG. 8 is a graphical representations showing, by way of example, trend analysis of cardiac stroke volume profile. -
FIG. 9 is a flow chart showing a method for assessing cardiac performance through transcardiac impedance monitoring, in accordance with a further embodiment of the present invention. -
FIG. 10 is a flow chart showing a routine for collecting physiological measures for use in the method ofFIG. 9 . -
FIG. 11 is a flow chart showing a routine for assessing cardiac performance for use in the method ofFIG. 9 . -
FIG. 12 is a flow chart showing a routine for evaluating cardiac stroke volume profile relative to, by way of example, the Valsalva maneuver, for use in the routine ofFIG. 11 . -
FIG. 1 is a schematic diagram 100 showing an implantable medical device (IMD) 103 monitoring transcardiac impedance, in accordance with a further embodiment of the present invention. TheIMD 103 is surgically implanted in the chest or abdomen of a patient and consists generally of ahousing 104 andterminal block 105. TheIMD 103 is coupled to a set of leads 106 a-b at theterminal block 105. During surgery, the leads 106 a-b are threaded through a vein and placed into theheart 102 with the distal tips of each lead 106 a-b positioned in direct contact with tissue inside theheart 102. - The
housing 104 contains abattery 107,control circuitry 108,memory 109, andtelemetry circuitry 110. Thebattery 107 provides a finite power source for the IMD components. Thecontrol circuitry 108 samples and processes raw data signals and includes signal filters and amplifiers, memory and a microprocessor-based controller, as would be appreciated by one skilled in the art. Thememory 109 includes a short-term, volatile memory store in which raw physiological signals can be stored as telemetered signals for later retrieval and analysis. Thetelemetry circuitry 110 provides an interface between theIMD 103 external devices (not shown). Thetelemetry circuitry 110 enables operating parameters to be non-invasively programmed into thememory 109 through an external device in telemetric communication with theIMD 103. Thetelemetry circuitry 110 also allows patient information collected by theIMD 103 and transiently stored in thememory 109 to be sent to the external device for processing and analysis. - The
IMD 103 is in direct electrical communication with theheart 102 through electrodes 111 a-b positioned on the distal tips of each lead 106 a-b. By way of example, the set of leads 106 a-b can include aright ventricular electrode 111 a and a rightatrial electrode 111 b. Theright ventricular electrode 111 a is preferably placed in theright ventricular apex 112 of theheart 102 and the rightatrial electrode 111 b is preferably placed in the rightatrial chamber 113 of theheart 102. The electrodes 111 a-b enable theIMD 103 to directly collect raw physiological measures, preferably through millivolt measurements. Other configurations and arrangements of leads and electrodes, including the use of single and multiple leads arrays and single and multiple electrodes, can be used, as would be recognized by one skilled in the art. - In the described embodiment, the
IMD 103 can be implemented as part of cardiac pacemakers used for managing bradycardia, implantable cardioverter defibrillators (IMDs) used for treating tachycardia, and other types of implantable cardiovascular monitors and therapeutic devices used for monitoring and treating heart failure, structural problems of the heart, such as congestive heart failure, rhythm problems, and other heart conditions, as would be appreciated by one skilled in the art. Examples of cardiac pacemakers suitable for use in the described embodiment include the Pulsar Max II, Discovery, and Discovery II pacing systems, sold by Guidant Corporation, St. Paul, Minn. An example of an IMD suitable for use in the described embodiment includes the Contak Renewal cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillator, also sold by Guidant Corporation, St. Paul, Minn. - On a regular basis, the telemetered signals stored in the
memory 109 are retrieved. By way of example, a programmer (not shown) can be used to retrieve the telemetered signals. However, any form of programmer, interrogator, recorder, monitor, or telemetered signals transceiver suitable for communicating withIMD 103 could be used, as would be appreciated by one skilled in the art. In addition, a server, personal computer or digital data processor could be interfaced to theIMD 103, either directly or via a telemetered signals transceiver configured to communicate with the implantablemedical device 103. - The programmer communicates with the
IMD 103 via radio frequency signals exchanged through a wand placed over the location of theIMD 103. Programming or interrogating instructions are sent to theIMD 103 and the stored telemetered signals are downloaded into the programmer. Once downloaded, the telemetered signals can be sent via a network, such as the Internet, to a server (not shown), which periodically receives and stores the telemetered signals in a database, as further described below with reference toFIG. 6 . - An example of a programmer suitable for use in the present invention is the Model 2901 Programmer Recorder Monitor, manufactured by Guidant Corporation, Indianapolis, Ind., which includes the capability to store retrieved telemetered signals on a proprietary removable floppy diskette. The telemetered signals could later be electronically transferred using a personal computer or similar processing device, as would be appreciated by one skilled in the art.
- Other alternate telemetered signals transfer means could also be employed. For instance, the stored telemetered signals could be retrieved from the
IMD 103 and electronically transferred to a network using a combination of a remote external programmer and analyzer and a remote telephonic communicator, such as described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,113,869, the disclosure of which is incorporated by reference. Similarly, the stored telemetered signals could be retrieved and remotely downloaded to a server using a world-wide patient location and data telemetry system, such as described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,752,976, the disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference. -
FIG. 2 is a schematic diagram 120 showing an externalmedical device 122 assisting in monitoring transcardiac impedance, in accordance with a further embodiment of the present invention. The externalmedical device 122 facilitates transcardiac impedance monitoring by ensuring consistent intrathoracic pressure, particularly when thoracic pressure is elevated when induced, for instance, by performance of the Valsalva maneuver. The externalmedical device 122 includes amouthpiece 123 functionally connected to apressure monitor 124 via ahose 125. The pressure monitor 124 defines a confined volume into which thepatient 121 blows. Apressure regulating device 126 releases expired air. The pressure monitor 124 provides a pressure reading representative of the pressure in the confined volume. The pressure monitor 124 can also provide recording functions that record the pressure levels during performance of a transcardiac maneuver by apatient 121. - In a further embodiment, a thoracic pressure electrode, such as described in U.S. Pat. No. 6,132,384, the disclosure of which is incorporated by reference, can be combined with the
IMD 103 to provide a fully implanted solution. The use of an implanted thoracic pressure electrode enables measurements during normal activities of daily living that produce elevated thoracic pressure similar to an induced performance of the Valsalva maneuver. When an elevated thoracic pressure is detected by the implanted thoracic pressure electrode, intracardiac impedance is recorded by theIMD 103 on a continuous basis. After the cardiac response period ends, the recorded intracardiac impedance data can either be downloaded to an external device (not shown) for further analysis, as further described below with reference toFIG. 11 , or can be analyzed by theIMD 103. -
FIGS. 3A-C are graphical representations showing, by way of example, averaged arterial blood pressure profiles 130, 150, 170 relative to performance of the Valsalva maneuver in a healthy person, a patient suffering from heart disease but not significant heart failure and a patient suffering from significant heart failure, respectively. Thex-axis axis - The Valsalva maneuver involves deep inspiration followed by forced exhalation against a closed glottis for ten to twelve seconds. The four phases of the Valsalva maneuver exhibit a characteristic signature for normal healthy people and for patients suffering from heart disease, but not significant heart failure. During Phase I, initial strain, systemic blood pressure undergoes a transient rise as straining commences. During Phase II, strain duration and cessation of breathing, systemic venous return, blood pressure and pulse pressure decrease perceptibly. During Phase III, strain discontinuation and resumption of normal breathing, blood pressure and systemic venous return exhibit abrupt, transient decreases. During Phase IV, recovery, systemic arterial pressure overshoots with reflex bradycardia. However, for patients suffering from heart failure, the response signature is a muted square wave response with a slight elevation in blood pressure during phase III and minimal perceptible changes during Phases I, II and IV.
- Cardiac performance response profile is significantly dependent on left ventricular function, specifically LVEF and mean LVEDP. A healthy person with no history of cardiovascular diseases may, for example, be expected to have an LVEF and mean LVEDP of approximately 70% and 14 mmHg, respectively. A patient suffering from heart disease but not significant heart failure may, for example, typically be expected to have an LVEF and mean LVEDP of approximately 50% and 20 mmHg, respectively. A patient suffering from heart failure may, for example, typically be expected to have an LVEF and mean LVEDP of approximately 30% and 40 mmHg, respectively.
- Healthy Person
- Referring first to
FIG. 3A , the graphical representation shows, by way of example, an averaged arterialblood pressure profile 130 relative to performance of the Valsalva maneuver in a healthy person with no history of cardiovascular diseases. DuringPhase I 133, intrathoracic pressure increases in response to the strain associated with the maneuver, along with asharp rise 137 in arterial pressure approximately equal to the intrathoracic pressure increase. DuringPhase II 134, pulse pressure narrows and arterial pressure undergoes atransient decrease 138. DuringPhase III 135, systolic pressure drops rapidly 139. Finally, duringPhase IV 136, diastolic and systolic pressures return topre-maneuver levels 141 following alarge overshoot 140 in arterial pressure. - Patient Suffering from Heart Disease but not Significant Heart Failure
- Referring next to
FIG. 3B , the graphical representation shows, by way of example, an averaged arterialblood pressure profile 150 relative to performance of the Valsalva maneuver in a patient suffering from heart disease but not significant heart failure. DuringPhase I 153, systemic arterial pressure increases only slightly 157. DuringPhase II 154, systemicarterial pressure 158 increases approximately equal to the increase in intrathoracic pressure followed by a narrowing of pulse pressure andarterial pressure decrease 159. DuringPhase III 155, systolic pressure drops rapidly 160. Finally, duringPhase IV 156, diastolic and systolic pressures return topre-maneuver levels 161 without overshoot. - Patient Suffering from Heart Failure
- Finally, referring first to
FIG. 3C , the graphical representation shows, by way of example, an averaged arterialblood pressure profile 170 relative to performance of the Valsalva maneuver in a patient suffering from heart failure. DuringPhase I 173, almost no appreciable increase in systemic arterial pressure occurs 177. DuringPhase II 174, pulse pressure and systemic systolic pressure remain at approximately the sameelevated level 178 throughout the phase. DuringPhase III 175, systolic pressure decreases to approximately the same level as inPhase I 173. DuringPhase IV 176, diastolic and systolic pressures return to theirpre-maneuver levels 180 almost immediately upon cessation of strain. -
FIG. 4 is a graphical representations showing, by way of example, cardiac dimension profiles 182 a, 182 b, during diastole and systole, respectively, relative to performance of the Valsalva maneuver in a healthy person, a patient suffering from heart disease but not significant heart failure and a patient suffering from significant heart failure. The x-axis represents time. The y-axis indicates average dimensional change (%). Averaged changes in dimension are plotted over time throughout each of the four phases 183 a-186 a, 183 b-186 b of the Valsalva maneuver. - Healthy Person
- During Phase I 183 a, 183 b, cardiac dimension decreases in response to the strain associated with the maneuver for a healthy person with no history of cardiovascular diseases. During
Phase II Phase III Phase IV - Patient Suffering from Heart Disease but not Significant Heart Failure
- The average cardiac dimensional change for a patient suffering from heart disease but not significant heart failure 182 ab, 182 bb, is essentially the same as the changes observed for a healthy person with no history of cardiovascular diseases.
- Patient Suffering from Heart Failure
- The average cardiac dimensional change for a patient suffering from significant heart failure reflects only slight changes during each of the four phases of a Valsalva maneuver.
-
FIG. 5 is a graphical representations showing, by way of example, strokevolume index profile 188 a and leftventricular pressure profile 188 b relative to performance of the Valsalva maneuver in a healthy person. The x-axis represents time. The left hand y-axis indicates stroke volume index (ml/M2) and the right hand y-axis indicates LV pressure. Changes in stroke volume index and left ventricular pressure are plotted over time throughout each of the fourphases Phase II 187 b, the stroke volume index and left ventricular and diastolic systolic pressures decrease significantly. DuringPhase III 187 c, the stroke volume index begins an increase towards pre-maneuver levels, but the left ventricular diastolic and systolic pressures remain stable. Finally, duringPhase IV 187 d, the stroke volume index and left ventricular diastolic and systolic pressures return to pre-maneuver levels. - LVEF and LVEDP Correlations
- Heart disease patient management requires carefully monitoring and evaluation of LVEF and LVEDP. In heart failure patients, an increase in LVEDP can lead to an acute exasperation of heart failure and acute decompensation. Changes to LVEDP associated with the acute exasperation of heart failure can occur in a few days, whereas changes to LVEF occur more slowly and are associated with long-term changes. Thus, effectively assessing cardiac performance, particularly for heart disease and heart failure patients, requires evaluating LVEF and LVEDP or equivalent values that approximate LVEF and LVEDP changes, such as intracardiac impedance.
- Comparing the averaged cardiac dimension profiles 182 a, 182 b described above with reference to
FIG. 4 , healthy people and patients suffering from heart disease undergo significant dimensional changes during performance of the Valsalva maneuver, while the cardiac dimensions in patients with significant heart failure changes only slightly. Intracardiac impedance has been empirically correlated to changes in left ventricular pressure, such as described in Wortel et al., Impedance Measurements in the Human Right Ventricular Using a New Pacing System, Pacing Clinical Electrophysiology, Vol. 14(9), pp. 1336-42 (September 1991), the disclosure of which is incorporated by reference, and can therefore be used as a surrogate measure of cardiac dimensional changes. - In a further embodiment, the Müller maneuver is performed either in lieu of or in addition to the Valsalva maneuver. The Müller maneuver involves deep inspiration while the nose is held closed and mouth firmly sealed for ten seconds. The Müller maneuver exaggerates inspiration effort and augments murmurs and right side cardiac filling sounds.
-
FIG. 6 is a functional block diagram showing asystem 190 for assessing cardiac performance through transcardiac impedance monitoring, in accordance with a further embodiment of the present invention. Each component is a computer program, procedure or process written as source code in a conventional programming language, such as the C++ programming language, and is presented for execution by one or more CPUs as object or byte code in a uniprocessing, distributed or parallelized configuration, as would be appreciated by one skilled in the art. The various implementations of the source code and object and byte codes can be held on a computer-readable storage medium or embodied on a transmission medium in a carrier wave. - The
system 190 consists of aserver 191 coupled to adatabase 197, which provides persistent secondary storage. Theserver 191 consists of three modules:telemetry 192,database 193, andanalysis 194. Thetelemetry module 192 communicatively interfaces to theIMD 103 through a logically-formed, non-invasive communication channel, such as provided though induction, static magnetic field coupling, or by related means, as would be appreciated by one skilled in the art. Thetelemetry module 192 facilitates the transferal and exchange ofphysiological measures 195 andprogramming parameters 196 between theIMD 103 and theserver 191. Thephysiological measures 195 include raw physiological data regularly collected by theIMD 103 and stored in thememory 109. Theprogramming parameters 196 include monitoring and therapy delivery device configuration settings, which are exchanged between theIMD 103 and theserver 191. Thetelemetry module 192 communicates with thetelemetry circuitry 110 on theIMD 103 using standard programmer communication protocols, as would be appreciated by one skilled in the art. - For an exemplary cardiac implantable medical device, the
physiological measures 195 andprogramming parameters 196 non-exclusively present patient information recorded on a per heartbeat, binned average or derived basis and relating to atrial electrical activity, ventricular electrical activity, minute ventilation, patient activity score, cardiac output score, mixed venous oxygenation score, cardiovascular pressure measures, time of day, the number and types of interventions made, and the relative success of any interventions, plus the status of the batteries and programmed settings. - The
database module 193 maintains information stored in thedatabase 197 as structured records for facilitating efficient storage and retrieval. Thedatabase module 193 stores thephysiological measures 195 andprogramming parameters 196 exchanged with theIMD 103 in thedatabase 197. Thedatabase 197 stores thephysiological measures 195 as derived measures, which include, non-exclusively,impedance measures 198, cardiacdimensional measures 199, LVEF measures 200, and LVEDP measures 201. Other raw and derived measures can be stored in thedatabase 197, as would be recognized by one skilled in the art. Theprogramming parameters 196 are maintained in the database as programming values 202. In addition,patient profile information 203 is maintained in thedatabase 197. - The
analysis module 194 derives and evaluates the physiological data maintained in thedatabase 197. As necessary, thephysiological measures 195 retrieved from theIMD 103 are converted and derived into the impedance measures 198, cardiacdimensional measures 199, LVEF measures 200, andLVEDP 201, as would be appreciated by one skilled in the art. In particular, the impedance measures 198 are analyzed and evaluated to determine an overall arterial blood pressure profile, which is compared topredefined thresholds 204 for assessing cardiac performance relative to the performance of an intrathoracic pressure maneuver, as further described below with reference toFIG. 11 . Theanalysis module 194 generates acardiac performance assessment 205, which identifies trends indicating cardiovascular disease and, in particular, heart failure, absence, onset, progression, regression, and status quo. Thecardiac performance assessment 205 can be further evaluated to determine whether medical intervention is necessary. - In a further embodiment, the functions of the
server 191 are performed by theIMD 103, which directly generates thecardiac performance assessment 205, for retrieval by an external device. -
FIG. 7 is a graphical representation showing, by way of example,trend analysis 210 of arterialblood pressure profile 213. Thex-axis 211 represents time. The y-axis 212 indicates arterial pressure in mmHg. Averaged changes in arterial pressure are plotted over time throughout each of the four phases 214-217 of the Valsalva maneuver. - The arterial
blood pressure profile 213 models the characteristic signature exhibited during each phase of the Valsalva maneuver. DuringPhase I 214, the arterial pressure is evaluated for an increasingtrend 218. DuringPhase II 215, the arterial pressure is evaluated for a transient decreasingtrend 219. DuringPhase III 216, the arterial pressure is evaluated for a significantly decreasingtrend 220. Finally, duringPhase VI 217, the arterial pressure is evaluated for a steeply increasingtrend 221, followed by an overshootingtrend 222, followed by a decreasingtrend 223 with resumption of normal arterial pressure. In addition to the arterial pressure trends 218-223, pulsatile volume and heart rate can also be evaluated for trends, as would be recognized by one skilled in the art. -
FIG. 8 is a graphical representation showing, by way of example,trend analysis 213 of cardiac stroke volume profile. The x-axis represents time. The y-axis indicates stroke volume index in ml/M2. Averaged changes in stroke volume index are plotted over time throughout each of fourphases -
FIG. 9 is a flow chart showing amethod 225 for assessing cardiac performance through transcardiac impedance monitoring, in accordance with a further embodiment of the present invention. Themethod 225 is described as a sequence of process operations or steps, which can be executed, for instance, by a server 191 (shown inFIG. 6 ). In a further embodiment, themethod 225 can be executed directly by theIMD 103 or related means, which generates acardiac performance assessment 205 for retrieval by an external device. - The
method 225 preferably executes as a continuous processing loop 226-229. During each iteration (block 226), thephysiological measures 195 are retrieved from theIMD 103 and stored in thedatabase 197, as further described below with reference toFIG. 10 . Cardiac performance is then assessed (block 228), as further described below with reference toFIG. 11 . Processing continues (block 229), until the method exits or terminates. -
FIG. 10 is a flow chart showing a routine 230 for collecting physiological measures for use in themethod 225 ofFIG. 9 . The purpose of this routine is to regularly interface to theIMD 103, retrieve thephysiological measures 195 andprogramming parameters 196, and store the retrievedphysiological measures 195 andprogramming parameters 196 in thedatabase 197. - The routine begins initially by interfacing to the IMD 103 (block 231), using, for instance, inductive or static magnetic means, as would be appreciated by one skilled in the art. Raw
physiological measures 195 are retrieved from the IMD 103 (block 232). The rawphysiological measures 195 are converted and derived intoimpedance measures 198, cardiacdimensional measures 199, LVEF measures 200, and LVEDP measures 201 (block 233). The physiological measures are stored in the database 197 (block 234). If furtherphysiological measures 195 orprogramming parameters 196 require exchange with the IMD 103 (block 235), processing continues. Otherwise, the interface to theIMD 103 is closed (block 236), the routine returns. -
FIG. 11 is a flow chart showing a routine 240 for assessing cardiac performance for use in themethod 225 ofFIG. 9 . The purpose of this routine is to periodically assess cardiac performance through an analysis of the cardiac stroke volume profile trends 224 (shown inFIG. 8 ). - As an initial step, physiological measures, including
impedance measures 198, cardiacdimensional measures 199, LVEF measures 200, andLVEDP measures 201, are retrieved from the database 197 (shown inFIG. 6 ) (block 241). The start of the intrathoracic pressure maneuver under consideration is determined (block 242). In the described embodiment, the start of the intrathoracic pressure maneuver is determined by retrieving an explicit marker recorded by thepatient 100 or by indirect means based upon an analysis of the retrieved physiological measures, as would be appreciated by one skilled in the art. - Next, the cardiac
stroke volume profile 224 is evaluated to form a cardiac performance assessment 205 (block 243), further described below with reference toFIG. 12 . If thecardiac performance assessment 205 exceeds the predefined threshold 204 (block 244), a notification is generated (block 245). In the described embodiment, the notification takes the form of generating an alert for review and possible action by healthcare providers and can include generating appropriate feedback to thepatient 100, such as described in commonly-assigned U.S. Pat. No. 6,203,495, the disclosure of which is incorporated by reference. - If the
cardiac performance assessment 205 does not exceed the threshold 204 (block 244), no notification is generated. If further retrieved physiological measures require evaluation (block 246), processing continues. Otherwise, the routine returns. -
FIG. 12 is a flow chart showing a routine 250 for evaluating cardiacstroke volume profile 224 relative to, by way of example, the Valsalva maneuver, for use in the routine 240 ofFIG. 11 . The purpose of this routine is to generate acardiac performance assessment 205 by forming a trend analysis of the retrieved physiological measures based on the phases of the Valsalva maneuver. - The trend analysis proceeds in four groups of steps (blocks 251-253, 254-256, 257-259, 260-268, respectively), which track each of the four phases of the Valsalva maneuver. During the first group, if the cardiac
stroke volume profile 224 is in Phase I (block 251) and an increase in arterial pressure is apparent (block 252), the increase is marked (block 253). During the second group, if the cardiacstroke volume profile 224 is in Phase II (block 254) and a transient decrease in arterial pressure is apparent (block 255), the transient decrease is marked (block 256). During the third group, if the cardiacstroke volume profile 224 is in Phase III (block 256) and a significant decrease in arterial pressure is apparent (block 258), the significant decrease is marked (block 259). Finally, during the fourth group, if the cardiacstroke volume profile 224 is in Phase VI (block 260), four conditions are evaluated. If an increase in arterial pressure is apparent (block 261), the increase is marked (block 262). If the increase in arterial pressure is followed by an overshoot (block 263), the overshoot is marked (block 264). For the Valsalva maneuver, the overshoot is the strongest trend indication in the characteristic signature and indicates a healthy, non-heart failure person. If the overshoot is followed by a decrease in arterial pressure (block 265), the decrease is marked (block 266). Finally, if a resumption of normal arterial pressure is apparent (block 267), the resumption is marked (block 268). - Following the evaluation of each of the groups, the impedance measures are correlated to cardiac stroke volume to reflect cardiac dimensional changes, as described above with reference to
FIG. 3 . Next, the overall cardiacstroke volume profile 224 is determined (block 270) to generate acardiac performance assessment 205. Thecardiac performance assessment 205 quantifies the variants between the physiological measures determined during each of the phases against the cardiac strokevolume profile trends 224 e-224 h. Following determination of thecardiac performance assessment 205, the routine returns. - In the described embodiment, the cardiac impedance data can be analyzed in several ways. In one embodiment, a statistical analysis can be performed on impedance data to determine the mean impedance level and standard deviation over the entire response period. The mean
Z and the standard deviation Sz of the impedance data over the response period can be used as acardiac performance assessment 205, where: -
- In a further embodiment, a statistical analysis can be performed on different phases of the response period based on the collected impedance data to determine the
cardiac performance assessment 205. For example, the mean and standard deviation analysis, described above, can be performed on physiological data from Phase IV of the response period relative to the performance of the Valsalva maneuver. The analyzed values reflect the amplitude of impedance change during the Valsalva maneuver as thecardiac performance assessment 205. - In a further embodiment, the impedance data can be analyzed for trends by calculating a linear regression over the collected data for Phase IV of the response period, such as described in Seborg et al., “Process Dynamics and Control,” pp. 165-167 (John Wiley & Sons, 1989), the disclosure of which is incorporated by reference. By performing a linear regression, the response pattern during Phase IV can be fitted into a second-order system response, which is characterized by a transfer function, such as:
-
- where τ1 and τ2 are derived empirically by linear regression. Alternatively, a second order process transfer function can arise upon transforming a second-order differential equation process model that has the general form of:
-
- where ζ is the dimensionless damping factor.
By equating the two transfer functions, the value of the damping factor can be derived as: -
- The resulting response pattern is characterized by the derived value of the damping factor ζ according to the following table:
- ζ>1 Over damped
- ζ=1 Critically damped
- 0<ζ<1 Under damped
- Phase IV of the Valsalva maneuver exhibits the most noticeable difference in cardiac response for the three groups of individuals described above with reference to
FIGS. 3A-C and 4, that is, a healthy person, a patient suffering from heart disease and a patient suffering from heart failure. During Phase IV, the response pattern from the healthy person group closely resembles an under-damped second-order response, which is characterized by a damping factor between zero and one. The response pattern from the heart disease patient group closely resembles a critically-damped or under-damped second-order response, which is characterized by a damping factor that is equal to or greater than one but not substantially higher than one. The response pattern from the heart failure patient group shows no appreciable change, which resembles a severely-over damped system characterized by a large damping factor. The damping factor serves as acardiac performance assessment 205. Other types of statistical analyses can also be performed, as would be recognized by one skilled in the art. - While the invention has been particularly shown and described as referenced to the embodiments thereof, those skilled in the art will understand that the foregoing and other changes in form and detail may be made therein without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention.
Claims (23)
1. A system for evaluating cardiac performance relative to performance of an intrathoracic pressure maneuver, comprising:
an implantable medical device to indirectly sense blood pressure by directly collecting intracardiac impedance measures; and
an analysis component to evaluate cardiac functional changes to the blood pressure in response to performance of an intrathoracic pressure maneuver.
2. A system according to claim 1 , wherein the blood pressure comprises at least one of arterial pressure, cardiac chamber pressure, systolic pressure, and diastolic pressure.
3. A system according to claim 2 , wherein the cardiac chamber pressure comprises left ventricular end diastolic pressure.
4. A system according to claim 1 , wherein the implantable medical device comprises at least one of a bradycardia, tachycardia, heart failure, therapy delivery, and monitoring device.
5. A system according to claim 1 , further comprising:
at least one lead to couple to the implantable medical device and to sense at least one of the intracardiac impedance measures across the thoracic cavity and the intracardiac impedance measures across the heart.
6. A system according to claim 1 , wherein the intrathoracic pressure maneuver comprises at least one of a Valsalva and Müller maneuver.
7. A system according to claim 1 , further comprising:
an evaluation subcomponent to evaluate at least one of overdamping and underdamping cardiac impedance response relative to normative levels.
8. A system according to claim 7 , further comprising:
a notification subcomponent to generate a notification responsive to the at least one of overdamping and underdamping cardiac impedance response.
9. A system according to claim 1 , wherein thoracic pressure is monitored during the intrathoracic pressure maneuver.
10. A system according to claim 9 , further comprising:
an external pressure monitor to define a confined volume configured to receive a forced exhalation and to measure the thoracic pressure relative to the confined volume.
11. A system according to claim 9 , further comprising:
a thoracic pressure sensor to internally measure thoracic pressure.
12. A method for evaluating cardiac performance relative to performance of an intrathoracic pressure maneuver, comprising:
indirectly sensing blood pressure by directly collecting intracardiac impedance measures through an implantable medical device; and
evaluating cardiac functional changes to the blood pressure in response to performance of an intrathoracic pressure maneuver.
13. A method according to claim 12 , wherein the blood pressure comprises at least one of arterial pressure, cardiac chamber pressure, systolic pressure, and diastolic pressure.
14. A method according to claim 13 , wherein the cardiac chamber pressure comprises left ventricular end diastolic pressure.
15. A method according to claim 12 , wherein the implantable medical device comprises at least one of a bradycardia, tachycardia, heart failure, therapy delivery, and monitoring device.
16. A method according to claim 12 , further comprising:
sensing at least one of the intracardiac impedance measures across the thoracic cavity and the intracardiac impedance measures across the heart.
17. A method according to claim 12 , wherein the intrathoracic pressure maneuver comprises at least one of a Valsalva and Müller maneuver.
18. A method according to claim 12 , further comprising:
evaluating at least one of overdamping and underdamping cardiac impedance response relative to normative levels.
19. A method according to claim 18 , further comprising:
generating a notification responsive to the at least one of overdamping and underdamping cardiac impedance response.
20. A method according to claim 12 , further comprising:
monitoring thoracic pressure during the intrathoracic pressure maneuver.
21. A method according to claim 20 , further comprising:
defining a confined volume configured to receive a forced exhalation; and
measuring the thoracic pressure relative to the confined volume.
22. A method according to claim 20 , further comprising:
internally measuring thoracic pressure.
23. An apparatus for evaluating cardiac performance relative to performance of an intrathoracic pressure maneuver, comprising:
means for indirectly sensing blood pressure by directly collecting intracardiac impedance measures through an implantable medical device; and
means for evaluating cardiac functional changes to the blood pressure in response to performance of an intrathoracic pressure maneuver.
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US12/349,413 US20090118627A1 (en) | 2004-02-19 | 2009-01-06 | System and method for evaluating cardiac performance relative to performance of an intrathoracic pressure maneuver |
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US10/782,642 US7488290B1 (en) | 2004-02-19 | 2004-02-19 | System and method for assessing cardiac performance through transcardiac impedance monitoring |
US12/349,413 US20090118627A1 (en) | 2004-02-19 | 2009-01-06 | System and method for evaluating cardiac performance relative to performance of an intrathoracic pressure maneuver |
Related Parent Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US10/782,642 Division US7488290B1 (en) | 2004-02-19 | 2004-02-19 | System and method for assessing cardiac performance through transcardiac impedance monitoring |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
US20090118627A1 true US20090118627A1 (en) | 2009-05-07 |
Family
ID=36654175
Family Applications (2)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US10/782,642 Expired - Fee Related US7488290B1 (en) | 2004-02-19 | 2004-02-19 | System and method for assessing cardiac performance through transcardiac impedance monitoring |
US12/349,413 Abandoned US20090118627A1 (en) | 2004-02-19 | 2009-01-06 | System and method for evaluating cardiac performance relative to performance of an intrathoracic pressure maneuver |
Family Applications Before (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US10/782,642 Expired - Fee Related US7488290B1 (en) | 2004-02-19 | 2004-02-19 | System and method for assessing cardiac performance through transcardiac impedance monitoring |
Country Status (1)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (2) | US7488290B1 (en) |
Cited By (2)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20130184545A1 (en) * | 2012-01-12 | 2013-07-18 | Pacesetter, Inc. | System and method for detecting pulmonary congestion based on stroke volume using an implantable medical device |
WO2016179425A1 (en) * | 2015-05-05 | 2016-11-10 | The Johns Hopkins University | A device and method for non-invasive left ventricular end diastolic pressure (lvedp) measurement |
Families Citing this family (20)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US6328699B1 (en) * | 2000-01-11 | 2001-12-11 | Cedars-Sinai Medical Center | Permanently implantable system and method for detecting, diagnosing and treating congestive heart failure |
US8298150B2 (en) * | 2000-01-11 | 2012-10-30 | Cedars-Sinai Medical Center | Hemodynamic waveform-based diagnosis and treatment |
US6970742B2 (en) * | 2000-01-11 | 2005-11-29 | Savacor, Inc. | Method for detecting, diagnosing, and treating cardiovascular disease |
US7488290B1 (en) * | 2004-02-19 | 2009-02-10 | Cardiac Pacemakers, Inc. | System and method for assessing cardiac performance through transcardiac impedance monitoring |
US8025624B2 (en) * | 2004-02-19 | 2011-09-27 | Cardiac Pacemakers, Inc. | System and method for assessing cardiac performance through cardiac vibration monitoring |
US8600497B1 (en) | 2006-03-31 | 2013-12-03 | Pacesetter, Inc. | Systems and methods to monitor and treat heart failure conditions |
US7794404B1 (en) * | 2006-03-31 | 2010-09-14 | Pacesetter, Inc | System and method for estimating cardiac pressure using parameters derived from impedance signals detected by an implantable medical device |
US8208999B2 (en) | 2007-04-04 | 2012-06-26 | Pacesetter, Inc. | System and method for estimating electrical conduction delays from immittance values measured using an implantable medical device |
US8504153B2 (en) | 2007-04-04 | 2013-08-06 | Pacesetter, Inc. | System and method for estimating cardiac pressure based on cardiac electrical conduction delays using an implantable medical device |
CN101637394A (en) * | 2009-08-26 | 2010-02-03 | 济南大学 | Method for positioning and segmenting heart sound signal |
WO2011049925A1 (en) * | 2009-10-21 | 2011-04-28 | Tufts Medical Center, Inc. | Cardiac monitoring |
JP4672801B1 (en) * | 2010-02-19 | 2011-04-20 | 日本ライフライン株式会社 | Intracardiac defibrillation catheter system |
EP2793696B1 (en) | 2011-12-23 | 2016-03-09 | Cardiac Pacemakers, Inc. | Physiological status indicator apparatus |
JP5900974B2 (en) * | 2013-05-10 | 2016-04-06 | 日本ライフライン株式会社 | Intracardiac defibrillation catheter system |
US10835133B2 (en) | 2016-12-20 | 2020-11-17 | Medtronic, Inc. | Hydrostatic offset adjustment for measured cardiovascular pressure values |
US10376159B2 (en) | 2016-12-20 | 2019-08-13 | Medtronic, Inc. | Exercise triggered cardiovascular pressure measurement |
CN111031902B (en) * | 2017-08-31 | 2022-10-11 | 加利福尼亚大学董事会 | Multi-sensor stroke output monitoring system and analysis method |
US10918869B2 (en) | 2018-06-15 | 2021-02-16 | Pacesetter, Inc. | Methods and systems that monitor and respond to changes in physiological status based on measurements of respiration characteristics and pulmonary arterial pressure obtained from implantable sensors |
US11523743B2 (en) * | 2018-08-03 | 2022-12-13 | Cardiac Pacemakers, Inc. | Ambulatory monitoring of physiologic response to Valsalva maneuver |
US11723545B2 (en) | 2020-01-02 | 2023-08-15 | Boston Scientific Scimed, Inc. | Ambulatory dehydration monitoring during cancer therapy |
Citations (99)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US3298362A (en) * | 1963-12-10 | 1967-01-17 | Jr Maxwell W Lippitt | Instrument for use in performing a controlled valsalva maneuver |
US3832339A (en) * | 1970-06-24 | 1974-08-27 | Ciba Geigy Ag | Polyazo pigments of the 2-hydroxynaphthalene-3-carboxylic acidarylide series |
US4142533A (en) * | 1976-10-28 | 1979-03-06 | Research Corporation | Monitoring system for cardiac pacers |
US4197856A (en) * | 1978-04-10 | 1980-04-15 | Northrop Robert B | Ultrasonic respiration/convulsion monitoring apparatus and method for its use |
US4531527A (en) * | 1982-04-23 | 1985-07-30 | Survival Technology, Inc. | Ambulatory monitoring system with real time analysis and telephone transmission |
US4686999A (en) * | 1985-04-10 | 1987-08-18 | Tri Fund Research Corporation | Multi-channel ventilation monitor and method |
US4750495A (en) * | 1987-06-05 | 1988-06-14 | Medtronic, Inc. | Oxygen sensing pacemaker |
US4803625A (en) * | 1986-06-30 | 1989-02-07 | Buddy Systems, Inc. | Personal health monitor |
US4809697A (en) * | 1987-10-14 | 1989-03-07 | Siemens-Pacesetter, Inc. | Interactive programming and diagnostic system for use with implantable pacemaker |
US4852570A (en) * | 1989-02-09 | 1989-08-01 | Levine Alfred B | Comparative medical-physical analysis |
US4899758A (en) * | 1986-01-31 | 1990-02-13 | Regents Of The University Of Minnesota | Method and apparatus for monitoring and diagnosing hypertension and congestive heart failure |
US4987897A (en) * | 1989-09-18 | 1991-01-29 | Medtronic, Inc. | Body bus medical device communication system |
US5003976A (en) * | 1987-09-28 | 1991-04-02 | Eckhard Alt | Cardiac and pulmonary physiological analysis via intracardiac measurements with a single sensor |
US5040536A (en) * | 1990-01-31 | 1991-08-20 | Medtronic, Inc. | Intravascular pressure posture detector |
US5085213A (en) * | 1990-06-01 | 1992-02-04 | Leonard Bloom | Hemodynamically responsive system for and method of treating a malfunctioning heart |
US5113859A (en) * | 1988-09-19 | 1992-05-19 | Medtronic, Inc. | Acoustic body bus medical device communication system |
US5113869A (en) * | 1990-08-21 | 1992-05-19 | Telectronics Pacing Systems, Inc. | Implantable ambulatory electrocardiogram monitor |
US5133346A (en) * | 1990-12-03 | 1992-07-28 | Arvee Medical, Incorporated | Apnea monitor data system |
US5199428A (en) * | 1991-03-22 | 1993-04-06 | Medtronic, Inc. | Implantable electrical nerve stimulator/pacemaker with ischemia for decreasing cardiac workload |
US5291895A (en) * | 1985-06-03 | 1994-03-08 | Mcintyre Kevin M | Evaluation of heart mechanical performance |
US5301105A (en) * | 1991-04-08 | 1994-04-05 | Desmond D. Cummings | All care health management system |
US5331549A (en) * | 1992-07-30 | 1994-07-19 | Crawford Jr John M | Medical monitor system |
USRE34663E (en) * | 1985-02-19 | 1994-07-19 | Seale; Joseph B. | Non-invasive determination of mechanical characteristics in the body |
US5333615A (en) * | 1992-06-22 | 1994-08-02 | William Craelius | Apparatus for digitally recording and analyzing electrocardial and other bioelectric signals |
US5336245A (en) * | 1992-05-20 | 1994-08-09 | Angeion Corporation | Storage interrogation apparatus for cardiac data |
US5390238A (en) * | 1992-06-15 | 1995-02-14 | Motorola, Inc. | Health support system |
US5416695A (en) * | 1993-03-09 | 1995-05-16 | Metriplex, Inc. | Method and apparatus for alerting patients and medical personnel of emergency medical situations |
US5421343A (en) * | 1992-04-03 | 1995-06-06 | Feng; Genquan | Computer network EEMPI system |
US5437278A (en) * | 1992-01-10 | 1995-08-01 | Wilk; Peter J. | Medical diagnosis system and method |
US5438983A (en) * | 1993-09-13 | 1995-08-08 | Hewlett-Packard Company | Patient alarm detection using trend vector analysis |
US5522860A (en) * | 1993-12-31 | 1996-06-04 | Ela Medical S.A. | Control of an active implantable medical device |
US5591215A (en) * | 1994-11-30 | 1997-01-07 | Telectronics Pacing Systems, Inc. | Apparatus and method for detection of atrial fibrillation by ventricular stability and ventricular pacing |
US5603331A (en) * | 1996-02-12 | 1997-02-18 | Cardiac Pacemakers, Inc. | Data logging system for implantable cardiac device |
US5704366A (en) * | 1994-05-23 | 1998-01-06 | Enact Health Management Systems | System for monitoring and reporting medical measurements |
US5704345A (en) * | 1993-11-05 | 1998-01-06 | Resmed Limited | Detection of apnea and obstruction of the airway in the respiratory system |
US5711297A (en) * | 1993-12-29 | 1998-01-27 | First Opinion Corporation | Computerized medical advice system and method including meta function |
US5713350A (en) * | 1995-09-06 | 1998-02-03 | Fukuda Denshi Kabushiki Kaisha | Patient information analysis management system and method |
US5720771A (en) * | 1995-08-02 | 1998-02-24 | Pacesetter, Inc. | Method and apparatus for monitoring physiological data from an implantable medical device |
US5720770A (en) * | 1995-10-06 | 1998-02-24 | Pacesetter, Inc. | Cardiac stimulation system with enhanced communication and control capability |
US5724580A (en) * | 1995-03-31 | 1998-03-03 | Qmed, Inc. | System and method of generating prognosis and therapy reports for coronary health management |
US5724983A (en) * | 1994-08-01 | 1998-03-10 | New England Center Hospitals, Inc. | Continuous monitoring using a predictive instrument |
US5738102A (en) * | 1994-03-31 | 1998-04-14 | Lemelson; Jerome H. | Patient monitoring system |
US5743267A (en) * | 1995-10-19 | 1998-04-28 | Telecom Medical, Inc. | System and method to monitor the heart of a patient |
US5749907A (en) * | 1997-02-18 | 1998-05-12 | Pacesetter, Inc. | System and method for identifying and displaying medical data which violate programmable alarm conditions |
US5749908A (en) * | 1996-12-18 | 1998-05-12 | Pacesetter, Inc. | Methods and apparatus for annotating data in an implantable device programmer using digitally recorded sound |
US5752976A (en) * | 1995-06-23 | 1998-05-19 | Medtronic, Inc. | World wide patient location and data telemetry system for implantable medical devices |
US5769074A (en) * | 1994-10-13 | 1998-06-23 | Horus Therapeutics, Inc. | Computer assisted methods for diagnosing diseases |
US5772604A (en) * | 1997-03-14 | 1998-06-30 | Emory University | Method, system and apparatus for determining prognosis in atrial fibrillation |
US5772599A (en) * | 1996-05-09 | 1998-06-30 | Albert Einstein Healthcare Network | Apparatus and method for monitoring a system |
US5772586A (en) * | 1996-02-12 | 1998-06-30 | Nokia Mobile Phones, Ltd. | Method for monitoring the health of a patient |
US5778882A (en) * | 1995-02-24 | 1998-07-14 | Brigham And Women's Hospital | Health monitoring system |
US5785650A (en) * | 1995-08-09 | 1998-07-28 | Akasaka; Noboru | Medical system for at-home patients |
US5785660A (en) * | 1996-03-28 | 1998-07-28 | Pacesetter, Inc. | Methods and apparatus for storing intracardiac electrograms |
US5855593A (en) * | 1995-03-30 | 1999-01-05 | Medtronic, Inc. | Prioritized rule based method and apparatus for diagnosis and treatment for arrhythmias |
US5860918A (en) * | 1996-11-22 | 1999-01-19 | Hewlett-Packard Company | Representation of a review of a patent's physiological parameters |
US5876353A (en) * | 1997-01-31 | 1999-03-02 | Medtronic, Inc. | Impedance monitor for discerning edema through evaluation of respiratory rate |
US5879375A (en) * | 1992-08-06 | 1999-03-09 | Electric Boat Corporation | Implantable device monitoring arrangement and method |
US5891178A (en) * | 1996-05-14 | 1999-04-06 | Pacesetter, Inc. | Programmer system and associated methods for rapidly evaluating and programming an implanted cardiac device |
US5897493A (en) * | 1997-03-28 | 1999-04-27 | Health Hero Network, Inc. | Monitoring system for remotely querying individuals |
US5911132A (en) * | 1995-04-26 | 1999-06-08 | Lucent Technologies Inc. | Method using central epidemiological database |
US6014581A (en) * | 1998-03-26 | 2000-01-11 | Ep Technologies, Inc. | Interface for performing a diagnostic or therapeutic procedure on heart tissue with an electrode structure |
US6024699A (en) * | 1998-03-13 | 2000-02-15 | Healthware Corporation | Systems, methods and computer program products for monitoring, diagnosing and treating medical conditions of remotely located patients |
US6038469A (en) * | 1994-10-07 | 2000-03-14 | Ortivus Ab | Myocardial ischemia and infarction analysis and monitoring method and apparatus |
US6047203A (en) * | 1997-03-17 | 2000-04-04 | Nims, Inc. | Physiologic signs feedback system |
US6050940A (en) * | 1996-06-17 | 2000-04-18 | Cybernet Systems Corporation | General-purpose medical instrumentation |
US6063028A (en) * | 1997-03-20 | 2000-05-16 | Luciano; Joanne Sylvia | Automated treatment selection method |
US6067466A (en) * | 1998-11-18 | 2000-05-23 | New England Medical Center Hospitals, Inc. | Diagnostic tool using a predictive instrument |
US6073046A (en) * | 1998-04-27 | 2000-06-06 | Patel; Bharat | Heart monitor system |
US6080106A (en) * | 1997-10-28 | 2000-06-27 | Alere Incorporated | Patient interface system with a scale |
US6083248A (en) * | 1995-06-23 | 2000-07-04 | Medtronic, Inc. | World wide patient location and data telemetry system for implantable medical devices |
US6093146A (en) * | 1998-06-05 | 2000-07-25 | Matsushita Electric Works, Ltd. | Physiological monitoring |
US6168563B1 (en) * | 1992-11-17 | 2001-01-02 | Health Hero Network, Inc. | Remote health monitoring and maintenance system |
US6168653B1 (en) * | 1997-05-15 | 2001-01-02 | Filtertek, Inc | Pressure transmission apparatus |
US6171256B1 (en) * | 1998-04-30 | 2001-01-09 | Physio-Control Manufacturing Corporation | Method and apparatus for detecting a condition associated with acute cardiac ischemia |
US6171237B1 (en) * | 1998-03-30 | 2001-01-09 | Boaz Avitall | Remote health monitoring system |
US6223078B1 (en) * | 1999-03-12 | 2001-04-24 | Cardiac Pacemakers, Inc. | Discrimination of supraventricular tachycardia and ventricular tachycardia events |
US6225901B1 (en) * | 1997-03-07 | 2001-05-01 | Cardionet, Inc. | Reprogrammable remote sensor monitoring system |
US6234964B1 (en) * | 1997-03-13 | 2001-05-22 | First Opinion Corporation | Disease management system and method |
US6238349B1 (en) * | 1997-06-12 | 2001-05-29 | The Research Foundation Of State University Of New York | Method and apparatus for noninvasive determination of cardiac performance parameters |
US6246992B1 (en) * | 1996-10-16 | 2001-06-12 | Health Hero Network, Inc. | Multiple patient monitoring system for proactive health management |
US6249705B1 (en) * | 1999-10-21 | 2001-06-19 | Pacesetter, Inc. | Distributed network system for use with implantable medical devices |
US6250309B1 (en) * | 1999-07-21 | 2001-06-26 | Medtronic Inc | System and method for transferring information relating to an implantable medical device to a remote location |
US6263245B1 (en) * | 1999-08-12 | 2001-07-17 | Pacesetter, Inc. | System and method for portable implantable device interogation |
US6336900B1 (en) * | 1999-04-12 | 2002-01-08 | Agilent Technologies, Inc. | Home hub for reporting patient health parameters |
US6360123B1 (en) * | 1999-08-24 | 2002-03-19 | Impulse Dynamics N.V. | Apparatus and method for determining a mechanical property of an organ or body cavity by impedance determination |
US6363282B1 (en) * | 1999-10-29 | 2002-03-26 | Medtronic, Inc. | Apparatus and method to automatic remote software updates of medical device systems |
US6416471B1 (en) * | 1999-04-15 | 2002-07-09 | Nexan Limited | Portable remote patient telemonitoring system |
US6512949B1 (en) * | 1999-07-12 | 2003-01-28 | Medtronic, Inc. | Implantable medical device for measuring time varying physiologic conditions especially edema and for responding thereto |
US20030032887A1 (en) * | 2001-08-09 | 2003-02-13 | Colin Corporation | Heartbeat synchronous information acquiring apparatus and pulse wave propagation velocity related information acquiring apparatus, blood pressure monitoring apparatus and preejection period measuring apparatus utilizing heartbeat synchronous information |
US6522914B1 (en) * | 2000-07-14 | 2003-02-18 | Cardiac Pacemakers, Inc. | Method and apparatuses for monitoring hemodynamic activities using an intracardiac impedance-derived parameter |
US20030055679A1 (en) * | 1999-04-09 | 2003-03-20 | Andrew H. Soll | Enhanced medical treatment system |
US20030097158A1 (en) * | 2001-11-16 | 2003-05-22 | Belalcazar Hugo Andres | Non-invasive method and apparatus for cardiac pacemaker pacing parameter optimization and monitoring of cardiac dysfunction |
US20060167363A1 (en) * | 2001-10-11 | 2006-07-27 | Osypka Medical Gmbh | System and apparatus for determining the left-ventricular ejection time TLVE of a heart of a subject |
US20070161914A1 (en) * | 2003-01-24 | 2007-07-12 | Mark Zdeblick | Methods and systems for measuring cardiac parameters |
US20080034836A1 (en) * | 2002-05-14 | 2008-02-14 | Pacesetter, Inc. | System for calibrating implanted sensors |
US7488290B1 (en) * | 2004-02-19 | 2009-02-10 | Cardiac Pacemakers, Inc. | System and method for assessing cardiac performance through transcardiac impedance monitoring |
US20100016731A1 (en) * | 2008-07-15 | 2010-01-21 | Cardiox Corporation | Hemodynamic Detection of Circulatory Anomalies |
US20100016918A1 (en) * | 2003-12-19 | 2010-01-21 | Pacesetter, Inc. | Method for digital cardiac rhythm management |
US7711415B1 (en) * | 2006-11-08 | 2010-05-04 | Pacesetter, Inc. | Implantable devices, and methods for use therewith, for monitoring sympathetic and parasympathetic influences on the heart |
Family Cites Families (32)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US3776221A (en) | 1971-04-02 | 1973-12-04 | Intyre K Mc | Detecting impaired heart mechanical performance and apparatus therefor |
US3837339A (en) | 1972-02-03 | 1974-09-24 | Whittaker Corp | Blood glucose level monitoring-alarm system and method therefor |
US4548211A (en) | 1984-01-12 | 1985-10-22 | Marks Lloyd A | Computer assisted admittance plethysmograph |
JPH0191834A (en) | 1987-08-20 | 1989-04-11 | Tsuruta Hiroko | Abnormal data detection and information method in individual medical data central control system |
GB8726933D0 (en) | 1987-11-18 | 1987-12-23 | Cadell T E | Telemetry system |
USH1114H (en) | 1990-04-30 | 1992-12-01 | Medtronic, Inc. | Fiber-optic oxygen saturation/hematocrit sensor |
WO1992012490A1 (en) | 1991-01-11 | 1992-07-23 | Health Innovations, Inc. | Method and apparatus to control diet and weight using human behavior modification techniques |
US5355889A (en) | 1992-06-09 | 1994-10-18 | Albert Eisenstein Health Care Foundation | Monitoring system for producing patient status indicator |
US5334222A (en) | 1992-11-03 | 1994-08-02 | Cardiac Pacemakers, Inc. | Cardiac stimulating apparatus and method for heart failure therapy |
US5576952A (en) | 1993-03-09 | 1996-11-19 | Metriplex, Inc. | Medical alert distribution system with selective filtering of medical information |
US5357427A (en) | 1993-03-15 | 1994-10-18 | Digital Equipment Corporation | Remote monitoring of high-risk patients using artificial intelligence |
US5464012A (en) | 1993-09-13 | 1995-11-07 | Hewlett-Packard Company | Patient alarm detection using target mode |
US5544661A (en) | 1994-01-13 | 1996-08-13 | Charles L. Davis | Real time ambulatory patient monitor |
US5557514A (en) | 1994-06-23 | 1996-09-17 | Medicode, Inc. | Method and system for generating statistically-based medical provider utilization profiles |
US5687734A (en) | 1994-10-20 | 1997-11-18 | Hewlett-Packard Company | Flexible patient monitoring system featuring a multiport transmitter |
US5553609A (en) | 1995-02-09 | 1996-09-10 | Visiting Nurse Service, Inc. | Intelligent remote visual monitoring system for home health care service |
US5660183A (en) | 1995-08-16 | 1997-08-26 | Telectronics Pacing Systems, Inc. | Interactive probability based expert system for diagnosis of pacemaker related cardiac problems |
US5788640A (en) | 1995-10-26 | 1998-08-04 | Peters; Robert Mitchell | System and method for performing fuzzy cluster classification of stress tests |
US5697959A (en) | 1996-01-11 | 1997-12-16 | Pacesetter, Inc. | Method and system for analyzing and displaying complex pacing event records |
US5819251A (en) | 1996-02-06 | 1998-10-06 | Oracle Corporation | System and apparatus for storage retrieval and analysis of relational and non-relational data |
US5792062A (en) | 1996-05-14 | 1998-08-11 | Massachusetts Institute Of Technology | Method and apparatus for detecting nonlinearity in an electrocardiographic signal |
US5954640A (en) | 1996-06-27 | 1999-09-21 | Szabo; Andrew J. | Nutritional optimization method |
DE69734599T2 (en) | 1996-07-11 | 2007-02-08 | Medtronic, Inc., Minneapolis | MINIMALLY INVASIVE IMPLANTABLE DEVICE FOR MONITORING PHYSIOLOGICAL PROCESSES |
US5755737A (en) | 1996-12-13 | 1998-05-26 | Medtronic, Inc. | Method and apparatus for diagnosis and treatment of arrhythmias |
US5974124A (en) | 1997-01-21 | 1999-10-26 | Med Graph | Method and system aiding medical diagnosis and treatment |
US6122351A (en) | 1997-01-21 | 2000-09-19 | Med Graph, Inc. | Method and system aiding medical diagnosis and treatment |
US5957861A (en) | 1997-01-31 | 1999-09-28 | Medtronic, Inc. | Impedance monitor for discerning edema through evaluation of respiratory rate |
US6102856A (en) | 1997-02-12 | 2000-08-15 | Groff; Clarence P | Wearable vital sign monitoring system |
US6004276A (en) | 1997-03-03 | 1999-12-21 | Quinton Instrument Company | Open architecture cardiology information system |
US5788643A (en) | 1997-04-22 | 1998-08-04 | Zymed Medical Instrumentation, Inc. | Process for monitoring patients with chronic congestive heart failure |
US5993386A (en) | 1997-07-15 | 1999-11-30 | Ericsson; Arthur Dale | Computer assisted method for the diagnosis and treatment of illness |
US7862513B2 (en) * | 2002-05-14 | 2011-01-04 | Pacesetter, Inc. | Apparatus for minimally invasive calibration of implanted pressure transducers |
-
2004
- 2004-02-19 US US10/782,642 patent/US7488290B1/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
-
2009
- 2009-01-06 US US12/349,413 patent/US20090118627A1/en not_active Abandoned
Patent Citations (99)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US3298362A (en) * | 1963-12-10 | 1967-01-17 | Jr Maxwell W Lippitt | Instrument for use in performing a controlled valsalva maneuver |
US3832339A (en) * | 1970-06-24 | 1974-08-27 | Ciba Geigy Ag | Polyazo pigments of the 2-hydroxynaphthalene-3-carboxylic acidarylide series |
US4142533A (en) * | 1976-10-28 | 1979-03-06 | Research Corporation | Monitoring system for cardiac pacers |
US4197856A (en) * | 1978-04-10 | 1980-04-15 | Northrop Robert B | Ultrasonic respiration/convulsion monitoring apparatus and method for its use |
US4531527A (en) * | 1982-04-23 | 1985-07-30 | Survival Technology, Inc. | Ambulatory monitoring system with real time analysis and telephone transmission |
USRE34663E (en) * | 1985-02-19 | 1994-07-19 | Seale; Joseph B. | Non-invasive determination of mechanical characteristics in the body |
US4686999A (en) * | 1985-04-10 | 1987-08-18 | Tri Fund Research Corporation | Multi-channel ventilation monitor and method |
US5291895A (en) * | 1985-06-03 | 1994-03-08 | Mcintyre Kevin M | Evaluation of heart mechanical performance |
US4899758A (en) * | 1986-01-31 | 1990-02-13 | Regents Of The University Of Minnesota | Method and apparatus for monitoring and diagnosing hypertension and congestive heart failure |
US4803625A (en) * | 1986-06-30 | 1989-02-07 | Buddy Systems, Inc. | Personal health monitor |
US4750495A (en) * | 1987-06-05 | 1988-06-14 | Medtronic, Inc. | Oxygen sensing pacemaker |
US5003976A (en) * | 1987-09-28 | 1991-04-02 | Eckhard Alt | Cardiac and pulmonary physiological analysis via intracardiac measurements with a single sensor |
US4809697A (en) * | 1987-10-14 | 1989-03-07 | Siemens-Pacesetter, Inc. | Interactive programming and diagnostic system for use with implantable pacemaker |
US5113859A (en) * | 1988-09-19 | 1992-05-19 | Medtronic, Inc. | Acoustic body bus medical device communication system |
US4852570A (en) * | 1989-02-09 | 1989-08-01 | Levine Alfred B | Comparative medical-physical analysis |
US4987897A (en) * | 1989-09-18 | 1991-01-29 | Medtronic, Inc. | Body bus medical device communication system |
US5040536A (en) * | 1990-01-31 | 1991-08-20 | Medtronic, Inc. | Intravascular pressure posture detector |
US5085213A (en) * | 1990-06-01 | 1992-02-04 | Leonard Bloom | Hemodynamically responsive system for and method of treating a malfunctioning heart |
US5113869A (en) * | 1990-08-21 | 1992-05-19 | Telectronics Pacing Systems, Inc. | Implantable ambulatory electrocardiogram monitor |
US5133346A (en) * | 1990-12-03 | 1992-07-28 | Arvee Medical, Incorporated | Apnea monitor data system |
US5199428A (en) * | 1991-03-22 | 1993-04-06 | Medtronic, Inc. | Implantable electrical nerve stimulator/pacemaker with ischemia for decreasing cardiac workload |
US5301105A (en) * | 1991-04-08 | 1994-04-05 | Desmond D. Cummings | All care health management system |
US5437278A (en) * | 1992-01-10 | 1995-08-01 | Wilk; Peter J. | Medical diagnosis system and method |
US5421343A (en) * | 1992-04-03 | 1995-06-06 | Feng; Genquan | Computer network EEMPI system |
US5336245A (en) * | 1992-05-20 | 1994-08-09 | Angeion Corporation | Storage interrogation apparatus for cardiac data |
US5390238A (en) * | 1992-06-15 | 1995-02-14 | Motorola, Inc. | Health support system |
US5333615A (en) * | 1992-06-22 | 1994-08-02 | William Craelius | Apparatus for digitally recording and analyzing electrocardial and other bioelectric signals |
US5331549A (en) * | 1992-07-30 | 1994-07-19 | Crawford Jr John M | Medical monitor system |
US5879375A (en) * | 1992-08-06 | 1999-03-09 | Electric Boat Corporation | Implantable device monitoring arrangement and method |
US6168563B1 (en) * | 1992-11-17 | 2001-01-02 | Health Hero Network, Inc. | Remote health monitoring and maintenance system |
US5416695A (en) * | 1993-03-09 | 1995-05-16 | Metriplex, Inc. | Method and apparatus for alerting patients and medical personnel of emergency medical situations |
US5438983A (en) * | 1993-09-13 | 1995-08-08 | Hewlett-Packard Company | Patient alarm detection using trend vector analysis |
US5704345A (en) * | 1993-11-05 | 1998-01-06 | Resmed Limited | Detection of apnea and obstruction of the airway in the respiratory system |
US5711297A (en) * | 1993-12-29 | 1998-01-27 | First Opinion Corporation | Computerized medical advice system and method including meta function |
US5522860A (en) * | 1993-12-31 | 1996-06-04 | Ela Medical S.A. | Control of an active implantable medical device |
US5738102A (en) * | 1994-03-31 | 1998-04-14 | Lemelson; Jerome H. | Patient monitoring system |
US5704366A (en) * | 1994-05-23 | 1998-01-06 | Enact Health Management Systems | System for monitoring and reporting medical measurements |
US5724983A (en) * | 1994-08-01 | 1998-03-10 | New England Center Hospitals, Inc. | Continuous monitoring using a predictive instrument |
US6038469A (en) * | 1994-10-07 | 2000-03-14 | Ortivus Ab | Myocardial ischemia and infarction analysis and monitoring method and apparatus |
US5769074A (en) * | 1994-10-13 | 1998-06-23 | Horus Therapeutics, Inc. | Computer assisted methods for diagnosing diseases |
US5591215A (en) * | 1994-11-30 | 1997-01-07 | Telectronics Pacing Systems, Inc. | Apparatus and method for detection of atrial fibrillation by ventricular stability and ventricular pacing |
US5778882A (en) * | 1995-02-24 | 1998-07-14 | Brigham And Women's Hospital | Health monitoring system |
US5855593A (en) * | 1995-03-30 | 1999-01-05 | Medtronic, Inc. | Prioritized rule based method and apparatus for diagnosis and treatment for arrhythmias |
US5724580A (en) * | 1995-03-31 | 1998-03-03 | Qmed, Inc. | System and method of generating prognosis and therapy reports for coronary health management |
US5911132A (en) * | 1995-04-26 | 1999-06-08 | Lucent Technologies Inc. | Method using central epidemiological database |
US5752976A (en) * | 1995-06-23 | 1998-05-19 | Medtronic, Inc. | World wide patient location and data telemetry system for implantable medical devices |
US6083248A (en) * | 1995-06-23 | 2000-07-04 | Medtronic, Inc. | World wide patient location and data telemetry system for implantable medical devices |
US5720771A (en) * | 1995-08-02 | 1998-02-24 | Pacesetter, Inc. | Method and apparatus for monitoring physiological data from an implantable medical device |
US5785650A (en) * | 1995-08-09 | 1998-07-28 | Akasaka; Noboru | Medical system for at-home patients |
US5713350A (en) * | 1995-09-06 | 1998-02-03 | Fukuda Denshi Kabushiki Kaisha | Patient information analysis management system and method |
US5720770A (en) * | 1995-10-06 | 1998-02-24 | Pacesetter, Inc. | Cardiac stimulation system with enhanced communication and control capability |
US5743267A (en) * | 1995-10-19 | 1998-04-28 | Telecom Medical, Inc. | System and method to monitor the heart of a patient |
US5772586A (en) * | 1996-02-12 | 1998-06-30 | Nokia Mobile Phones, Ltd. | Method for monitoring the health of a patient |
US5603331A (en) * | 1996-02-12 | 1997-02-18 | Cardiac Pacemakers, Inc. | Data logging system for implantable cardiac device |
US5785660A (en) * | 1996-03-28 | 1998-07-28 | Pacesetter, Inc. | Methods and apparatus for storing intracardiac electrograms |
US5772599A (en) * | 1996-05-09 | 1998-06-30 | Albert Einstein Healthcare Network | Apparatus and method for monitoring a system |
US5891178A (en) * | 1996-05-14 | 1999-04-06 | Pacesetter, Inc. | Programmer system and associated methods for rapidly evaluating and programming an implanted cardiac device |
US6050940A (en) * | 1996-06-17 | 2000-04-18 | Cybernet Systems Corporation | General-purpose medical instrumentation |
US6246992B1 (en) * | 1996-10-16 | 2001-06-12 | Health Hero Network, Inc. | Multiple patient monitoring system for proactive health management |
US5860918A (en) * | 1996-11-22 | 1999-01-19 | Hewlett-Packard Company | Representation of a review of a patent's physiological parameters |
US5749908A (en) * | 1996-12-18 | 1998-05-12 | Pacesetter, Inc. | Methods and apparatus for annotating data in an implantable device programmer using digitally recorded sound |
US5876353A (en) * | 1997-01-31 | 1999-03-02 | Medtronic, Inc. | Impedance monitor for discerning edema through evaluation of respiratory rate |
US5749907A (en) * | 1997-02-18 | 1998-05-12 | Pacesetter, Inc. | System and method for identifying and displaying medical data which violate programmable alarm conditions |
US6225901B1 (en) * | 1997-03-07 | 2001-05-01 | Cardionet, Inc. | Reprogrammable remote sensor monitoring system |
US6234964B1 (en) * | 1997-03-13 | 2001-05-22 | First Opinion Corporation | Disease management system and method |
US5772604A (en) * | 1997-03-14 | 1998-06-30 | Emory University | Method, system and apparatus for determining prognosis in atrial fibrillation |
US6047203A (en) * | 1997-03-17 | 2000-04-04 | Nims, Inc. | Physiologic signs feedback system |
US6063028A (en) * | 1997-03-20 | 2000-05-16 | Luciano; Joanne Sylvia | Automated treatment selection method |
US5897493A (en) * | 1997-03-28 | 1999-04-27 | Health Hero Network, Inc. | Monitoring system for remotely querying individuals |
US6168653B1 (en) * | 1997-05-15 | 2001-01-02 | Filtertek, Inc | Pressure transmission apparatus |
US6238349B1 (en) * | 1997-06-12 | 2001-05-29 | The Research Foundation Of State University Of New York | Method and apparatus for noninvasive determination of cardiac performance parameters |
US6080106A (en) * | 1997-10-28 | 2000-06-27 | Alere Incorporated | Patient interface system with a scale |
US6024699A (en) * | 1998-03-13 | 2000-02-15 | Healthware Corporation | Systems, methods and computer program products for monitoring, diagnosing and treating medical conditions of remotely located patients |
US6014581A (en) * | 1998-03-26 | 2000-01-11 | Ep Technologies, Inc. | Interface for performing a diagnostic or therapeutic procedure on heart tissue with an electrode structure |
US6171237B1 (en) * | 1998-03-30 | 2001-01-09 | Boaz Avitall | Remote health monitoring system |
US6073046A (en) * | 1998-04-27 | 2000-06-06 | Patel; Bharat | Heart monitor system |
US6171256B1 (en) * | 1998-04-30 | 2001-01-09 | Physio-Control Manufacturing Corporation | Method and apparatus for detecting a condition associated with acute cardiac ischemia |
US6093146A (en) * | 1998-06-05 | 2000-07-25 | Matsushita Electric Works, Ltd. | Physiological monitoring |
US6067466A (en) * | 1998-11-18 | 2000-05-23 | New England Medical Center Hospitals, Inc. | Diagnostic tool using a predictive instrument |
US6223078B1 (en) * | 1999-03-12 | 2001-04-24 | Cardiac Pacemakers, Inc. | Discrimination of supraventricular tachycardia and ventricular tachycardia events |
US20030055679A1 (en) * | 1999-04-09 | 2003-03-20 | Andrew H. Soll | Enhanced medical treatment system |
US6336900B1 (en) * | 1999-04-12 | 2002-01-08 | Agilent Technologies, Inc. | Home hub for reporting patient health parameters |
US6416471B1 (en) * | 1999-04-15 | 2002-07-09 | Nexan Limited | Portable remote patient telemonitoring system |
US6512949B1 (en) * | 1999-07-12 | 2003-01-28 | Medtronic, Inc. | Implantable medical device for measuring time varying physiologic conditions especially edema and for responding thereto |
US6250309B1 (en) * | 1999-07-21 | 2001-06-26 | Medtronic Inc | System and method for transferring information relating to an implantable medical device to a remote location |
US6263245B1 (en) * | 1999-08-12 | 2001-07-17 | Pacesetter, Inc. | System and method for portable implantable device interogation |
US6360123B1 (en) * | 1999-08-24 | 2002-03-19 | Impulse Dynamics N.V. | Apparatus and method for determining a mechanical property of an organ or body cavity by impedance determination |
US6249705B1 (en) * | 1999-10-21 | 2001-06-19 | Pacesetter, Inc. | Distributed network system for use with implantable medical devices |
US6363282B1 (en) * | 1999-10-29 | 2002-03-26 | Medtronic, Inc. | Apparatus and method to automatic remote software updates of medical device systems |
US6522914B1 (en) * | 2000-07-14 | 2003-02-18 | Cardiac Pacemakers, Inc. | Method and apparatuses for monitoring hemodynamic activities using an intracardiac impedance-derived parameter |
US20030032887A1 (en) * | 2001-08-09 | 2003-02-13 | Colin Corporation | Heartbeat synchronous information acquiring apparatus and pulse wave propagation velocity related information acquiring apparatus, blood pressure monitoring apparatus and preejection period measuring apparatus utilizing heartbeat synchronous information |
US20060167363A1 (en) * | 2001-10-11 | 2006-07-27 | Osypka Medical Gmbh | System and apparatus for determining the left-ventricular ejection time TLVE of a heart of a subject |
US20030097158A1 (en) * | 2001-11-16 | 2003-05-22 | Belalcazar Hugo Andres | Non-invasive method and apparatus for cardiac pacemaker pacing parameter optimization and monitoring of cardiac dysfunction |
US20080034836A1 (en) * | 2002-05-14 | 2008-02-14 | Pacesetter, Inc. | System for calibrating implanted sensors |
US20070161914A1 (en) * | 2003-01-24 | 2007-07-12 | Mark Zdeblick | Methods and systems for measuring cardiac parameters |
US20100016918A1 (en) * | 2003-12-19 | 2010-01-21 | Pacesetter, Inc. | Method for digital cardiac rhythm management |
US7488290B1 (en) * | 2004-02-19 | 2009-02-10 | Cardiac Pacemakers, Inc. | System and method for assessing cardiac performance through transcardiac impedance monitoring |
US7711415B1 (en) * | 2006-11-08 | 2010-05-04 | Pacesetter, Inc. | Implantable devices, and methods for use therewith, for monitoring sympathetic and parasympathetic influences on the heart |
US20100016731A1 (en) * | 2008-07-15 | 2010-01-21 | Cardiox Corporation | Hemodynamic Detection of Circulatory Anomalies |
Cited By (4)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20130184545A1 (en) * | 2012-01-12 | 2013-07-18 | Pacesetter, Inc. | System and method for detecting pulmonary congestion based on stroke volume using an implantable medical device |
US9049995B2 (en) * | 2012-01-12 | 2015-06-09 | Pacesetter, Inc. | System and method for detecting pulmonary congestion based on stroke volume using an implantable medical device |
WO2016179425A1 (en) * | 2015-05-05 | 2016-11-10 | The Johns Hopkins University | A device and method for non-invasive left ventricular end diastolic pressure (lvedp) measurement |
US10729337B2 (en) | 2015-05-05 | 2020-08-04 | The Johns Hopkins University | Device and method for non-invasive left ventricular end diastolic pressure (LVEDP) measurement |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
US7488290B1 (en) | 2009-02-10 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US20090118627A1 (en) | System and method for evaluating cardiac performance relative to performance of an intrathoracic pressure maneuver | |
US8888710B2 (en) | System and method for assessing cardiac performance through cardiac vibration monitoring | |
US7329226B1 (en) | System and method for assessing pulmonary performance through transthoracic impedance monitoring | |
US11523778B2 (en) | Systems and methods for detecting worsening heart failure | |
US10506933B2 (en) | Method and device to monitor patients with kidney disease | |
US6869404B2 (en) | Apparatus and method for chronically monitoring heart sounds for deriving estimated blood pressure | |
US6865419B2 (en) | Method and apparatus for measurement of mean pulmonary artery pressure from a ventricle in an ambulatory monitor | |
US7524292B2 (en) | Method and apparatus for detecting respiratory disturbances | |
US11576620B2 (en) | Multi-disease patient management | |
US7794404B1 (en) | System and method for estimating cardiac pressure using parameters derived from impedance signals detected by an implantable medical device | |
US20150126878A1 (en) | Heart failure event detection and risk stratification using heart sound | |
US20150342540A1 (en) | Heart failure event detection and risk stratification using heart rate trend | |
US20230021724A1 (en) | Determining a fall risk responsive to detecting body position movements | |
US9750416B2 (en) | System and method for detection of pulmonary embolism | |
US8285378B1 (en) | System and method for determining patient-specific implantable medical device programming parameters |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
STCB | Information on status: application discontinuation |
Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION |