US20090187446A1 - Computer-implemented system for human resources management - Google Patents
Computer-implemented system for human resources management Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- US20090187446A1 US20090187446A1 US12/338,703 US33870308A US2009187446A1 US 20090187446 A1 US20090187446 A1 US 20090187446A1 US 33870308 A US33870308 A US 33870308A US 2009187446 A1 US2009187446 A1 US 2009187446A1
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- individual
- questions
- answers
- employer
- hire
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Abandoned
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q10/00—Administration; Management
- G06Q10/10—Office automation; Time management
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q10/00—Administration; Management
- G06Q10/06—Resources, workflows, human or project management; Enterprise or organisation planning; Enterprise or organisation modelling
- G06Q10/063—Operations research, analysis or management
- G06Q10/0631—Resource planning, allocation, distributing or scheduling for enterprises or organisations
- G06Q10/06311—Scheduling, planning or task assignment for a person or group
- G06Q10/063112—Skill-based matching of a person or a group to a task
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q10/00—Administration; Management
- G06Q10/06—Resources, workflows, human or project management; Enterprise or organisation planning; Enterprise or organisation modelling
- G06Q10/063—Operations research, analysis or management
- G06Q10/0639—Performance analysis of employees; Performance analysis of enterprise or organisation operations
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q10/00—Administration; Management
- G06Q10/10—Office automation; Time management
- G06Q10/105—Human resources
- G06Q10/1053—Employment or hiring
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q30/00—Commerce
- G06Q30/02—Marketing; Price estimation or determination; Fundraising
- G06Q30/0201—Market modelling; Market analysis; Collecting market data
- G06Q30/0203—Market surveys; Market polls
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G09—EDUCATION; CRYPTOGRAPHY; DISPLAY; ADVERTISING; SEALS
- G09B—EDUCATIONAL OR DEMONSTRATION APPLIANCES; APPLIANCES FOR TEACHING, OR COMMUNICATING WITH, THE BLIND, DEAF OR MUTE; MODELS; PLANETARIA; GLOBES; MAPS; DIAGRAMS
- G09B7/00—Electrically-operated teaching apparatus or devices working with questions and answers
- G09B7/02—Electrically-operated teaching apparatus or devices working with questions and answers of the type wherein the student is expected to construct an answer to the question which is presented or wherein the machine gives an answer to the question presented by a student
Definitions
- CSCPI Customer Service & Clerical Potential Inventory
- Richardson, Bellows, Henry and Co., Inc The CSCPI is unlike most other tests in that responses are not right or wrong in the traditional sense. Instead, the performance of the group picking each individual item alternative has been statistically correlated across large samples of potential and actual employees for a position so as to create a test that can produce a total score for that position. This total score may legally be used as a factor in the hiring or promotion process.
- the present invention is an electronic prediction system for assessing a suitability of job applicants for an employer.
- the electronic prediction system includes a plurality of terminals connected to the Internet, an applicant screening server connected through the Internet to the terminals that has a testing computer program that stores test data.
- a website identified is configured to present application questions to the applicants at the terminals and to receive applicant responses entered at the terminals in response to presentation of the application questions.
- the application questions include requirements questions eliciting information on whether the applicants meet employment requirements and a set of validated questions validated by correlating job performance ratings of a plurality of hired workers with previous responses given by the workers to the application questions before the workers were hired.
- the set of validated questions is a short subset of a large assessment selected to serve as a fast job-related pre-screen.
- a scoring system automatically scores the applicant responses in real time.
- the scoring system compares the applicant responses for requirements questions to employer requirements and being validated to predict both performance and turnover potential.
- a scoring database is connected to the applicant screening server.
- An applicant input system located on the employer's premises is configured to administer an in-depth assessment to an applicant at the employer's premises after the applicant has come to the employer's premises and logged on.
- a viewing system permits the employer to view applicant results from the electronic prediction system and the applicant's rank order, the applicant results providing information on applicants who have a high probability of performing successfully and not terminating early
- FIG. 1 provides a block diagram of an exemplary system in accordance with the present invention.
- FIG. 2 illustrates a process for testing and evaluating job applicants in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.
- FIG. 3 depicts a hiring procedure in accordance with one embodiment of the invention.
- FIG. 4 is a block diagram of a process employing feedback.
- FIG. 5 diagrams an online system in accordance with one embodiment of the invention.
- FIG. 6 shows an example of a web-based presentation for a screening solution.
- FIG. 7 shows an example of a stack ranked table.
- FIG. 8 shows an example of a screening solution question presented to an applicant taking a screening solution test over the Internet.
- FIG. 9 shows an example of a structured interview guide for use in an interview solution.
- FIG. 10 illustrates procedural steps that may be followed in a web-based applicant system according to an embodiment of the present invention.
- FIG. 11 illustrates procedural steps that may be followed in a web-based selection solution according to an embodiment of the present invention.
- FIG. 12 illustrates procedural steps that may be followed by an employer according to an embodiment of the present invention.
- FIG. 13 illustrates a human capital management life-cycle.
- a system for testing a job applicant provides a computerized stack ranking of multiple applicants, predictive of the comparative levels of successful job performance.
- the predictive stack ranking may be used as a dynamic interactive filter with a pool of applicants over the course of the evaluation or employment process.
- the system may utilize a communications network to communicate between an applicant terminal and a system server.
- the system may be used for example for screening, selecting, retaining, assigning, or analyzing the job applicant.
- the job applicant can for example be a new job applicant, an employee seeking to retain a job, an employee seeking a different job in the same organization, or an employee being evaluated for retention, re-assignment, or promotion. Applicants may or may not know they are being evaluated.
- the system may collect data regarding the employee for use in a feedback loop informing the online hiring process and improving the accuracy of the predictive stack ranking.
- the data may indicate the employer's rating of the employee's actual job performance.
- Such a rating can be cross-checked against the answers that the employee gave during the application process.
- the cross-checking can be used as feedback to refine the questions and evaluation criteria used at each stage of the hiring process. For example, the cross-checking may be analyzed to select from among many questions, a small subset having high predictive value. The small subset can then be used in a quick initial screening stage. Or, the small subset can be given greater weight than other questions in a computerized stack ranking of candidates.
- FIG. 1 provides a block diagram of an exemplary system in accordance with the present invention.
- a job applicant can use applicant terminal 102 to communicate over network 104 with system server 106 .
- Applicant terminal 102 may for example be a telephone handset, a personal computer, a workstation, a handheld wireless device such as those marketed under the trademarks PALM or HANDSPRING, or a Wireless Application Protocol enabled device such as a mobile phone.
- Network 104 may for example be the Internet, the World Wide Web, a wide area network, a local area network, a telephone network, a wireless communication network, a combination thereof, or any other link capable of carrying communications between an applicant terminal and a server.
- System server 106 employs a testing computer program 108 and has access to a scoring database 110 .
- System server 106 communicates with applicant terminal 102 in accordance with instructions from testing computer program 108 .
- System server 106 may communicate with employer server 112 over network 104 or over direct link 114 .
- System server 106 is shown as a unitary server, but may be a distributed computing platform.
- An applicant terminal may be remote from, or co-located with, system server 106 and/or employer server 112 .
- applicant terminal 102 may be located at a job applicant's home
- applicant terminal 116 may be located at a job fair or employment office
- applicant terminal 120 may be located at an employer's location.
- Partner server 121 may be linked to network 104 and system server 106 to facilitate integration of a business partner seeking to participate in the system of FIG. 1 .
- System server 106 may pose questions to a job applicant located at an applicant terminal, receive responses from the job applicant, and score the answers in accordance with scoring database 110 .
- the scoring may take place in real time, i.e., while the applicant is still online, and may be reported in the form of a comparative stack ranking of multiple applicants.
- the stack ranking may be delivered from system server 106 , over either network 104 or direct link 114 , to employer server 112 .
- Scoring of each answer by system server 106 may be instant, i.e., before the next question is answered.
- adaptive testing techniques may be implemented over network 104 .
- the answers given by an applicant at applicant terminal 102 to questions propounded early in a test may determine which questions are propounded by system server 106 to the applicant later in the same test.
- server 106 may immediately terminate the test.
- the system may test an online applicant for any competency desired, in any sequence.
- the tested competencies may be abilities, traits, knowledge, skills, etc., that have been proven relevant to and predictive of successful job performance.
- the following competencies may be tested:
- system server 106 tests for certain ones of the competencies that have been proven to be predictive of successful performance of the type of job for which the applicant is being considered.
- the results of the testing are tabulated in a stack ranked table.
- the stack ranked table may rank a number of applicants against each other and list them in order, from first to last.
- the table may also present other information for each applicant.
- the other information may include, by way of example and not limitation:
- Identifying number e.g. social security number.
- applicant testing 201 includes providing a test to a job applicant and scoring the applicant's answers.
- the test may be administered online or it may be administered manually off-line.
- Scores are entered into a system for calculating a stack ranked table.
- Predictive stack ranking 202 generally includes ranking a job applicant against other job applicants in order from first to last or other comparative ranking.
- the other job applicants may be current job applicants, past job applicants, or fictional job applicants.
- FIG. 3 depicts a hiring procedure in accordance with one embodiment of the invention.
- Announcement 302 may be an online job announcement such as a web page with an “apply now” hyperlink icon.
- the web page may reside on an employer's website or an employment agency website, for example.
- an online job announcement may be a recorded announcement on a menu-driven telephone voice processing system.
- announcement 302 may be an offline job announcement such as a newspaper advertisement.
- screening test 304 In response to announcement 302 , an interested job applicant requests administration of screening test 304 .
- Screening test 304 may be remotely administered and scored online, i.e., unproctored, with the scores being automatically provided to correlation and predictive stack ranking 306 .
- screening test 304 may be administered manually with paper and pencil, and then graded by hand or machine, with the scores being provided to correlation and predictive stack ranking 306 .
- the predictive stack ranking may for example be constructed by system server 106 or employer server 112 .
- Correlation and predictive stack ranking 306 totals the graded answers according to particular competencies known to be relevant to successful job performance.
- the questions to be asked at the various stages are selected for a particular type of job being offered in accordance with a proven relationship with desired business outcomes.
- Business outcomes can for example include: level of sales, customer satisfaction, quality measures such as fault rates, retention and tenure of employment, time keeping, learning ability, progression to more senior roles over time, and supervisor ratings of behavioral success.
- the particular type of job is defined in conjunction with the U.S. Department of Labor “O*NET” classification system.
- Some types of jobs might include customer service, technical, professional, or managerial.
- Various competencies are determined to be associated with desired business outcomes for a given type of job. These competencies are tested for at various solution stages with appropriate questions.
- the appropriate competencies, questions, scoring, weighting, and ranking factors for a new job can be designed from historical tests for existing jobs, by applying statistical techniques and using the gathering of data on the Internet to ensure rapid validation of the new assessment solution. Confirmatory job analysis is used to determine the appropriateness of solutions for a particular job.
- Correlation and predictive stack ranking 306 may be administered by a computer processor located at system server 106 , for example. Predictive stack ranking 306 may give different weight to different questions, and may at any stage immediately disqualify an applicant providing an unacceptable answer to a “knock-out” question. Correlation and predictive stack ranking 306 may rank the applicant in order against other job applicants in a table. Correlation and predictive stack ranking 306 may be used to decide which applicants to invite for the next stage, selection test 308 .
- Selection test 308 is preferably conducted under supervised conditions, i.e., proctored.
- selection test 308 may be administered in person.
- An in-person test may take place at a job fair, an employer's location, a job site, or an employment agency.
- An in-person test may include verification of the job applicant's identity, such as by examination of a photo identification document produced by a test-taker.
- Selection test 308 may be administered online or manually.
- Supervised conditions typically include observation of the test-taker during administration of the test. The answers to selection test 308 are graded and the results are incorporated in correlation and stack ranking 306 .
- Correlation and predictive stack ranking 306 may then update a previously created entry for the applicant and rank or re-rank the applicant in order against other job applicants. After this is accomplished, the highest ranking applicants may be invited for interview 310 .
- Interview 310 may be structured or unstructured, online or in person. If interview 310 is structured, a program leads the interviewer through the interview by suggesting questions one at a time.
- the program may be a list of questions written on paper or it may be a computer program resident for example in system server 106 .
- the program suggests questions that are predetermined to be valid, i.e., proven to be associated with successful job performance and legally permitted.
- the interviewer can input the answers and/or a score for the answers, either after each answer or at the conclusion of the interview. This can be done via employer terminal 124 , for example.
- Interview 310 results in an interview score being provided to correlation and predictive stack ranking 306 .
- Correlation and predictive stack ranking 306 is revised to reflect the interview score.
- the relative rank of the job applicants is reassessed.
- FIG. 4 is a block diagram of a process employing feedback.
- Test design 402 is initially performed using industry-accepted standards.
- Test administration 404 tests and scores job applicants and/or incumbents.
- Employee performance evaluation 406 measures actual job performance of the applicant or incumbent after holding the job for a period of time. This information is fed back to test design 402 and/or test administration 404 .
- Test design 402 may be revised to delete questions which were not predictive of successful job performance. This can be done for example by deleting questions whose answers bore no relation to performance evaluation 406 for a statistically valid sample.
- Test administration 404 may be revised by adjusting the weight given to certain questions or answers that showed an especially strong correlation to employee performance evaluation 406 . For example, if test administration 404 is associated with correlation and predictive stack ranking 306 , feedback from employee performance evaluation 406 may help determine how various job applicants are comparatively ranked against each other.
- FIG. 5 diagrams an online computer based system 500 in accordance with one embodiment of the invention.
- Box 502 represents a job vacancy with a requirement for an online screening and selection solution.
- the vacancy can come to the attention of a potential job applicant in a number of ways.
- box 504 represents an online application via a hiring company's own website.
- a company offering a job may post a vacancy announcement on the company's website and invite job seekers to apply by clicking on an icon labeled “apply here” or the like.
- Box 506 represents a similar posting on an online job board.
- Box 508 represents candidates given a Uniform Resource Locator (URL) directly by the company. This may occur when the company offering a job identifies a potential candidate.
- Box 510 represents a media advertisement including a URL for a job. Thus, job seekers observing the advertisement can direct their browsers to the indicated URL.
- URL Uniform Resource Locator
- Job seekers may be provided a URL associated with the company or the particular vacancy. Paper-and-pencil measures could also be used at job fairs and entered into the system.
- a computer terminal may be provided for use of job seekers at job fair 512 , enabling job seekers to participate in the online system.
- Box 514 represents an executive search via a recruiter network. Job seekers relevant to the search are identified in recruitment firm applicant database 516 . Database 516 can link to a URL associated with the job.
- the potential applicant is considered at decision 520 .
- Decision 520 asks whether applicant has completed the required screening solution 524 . If not, the applicant at box 522 is given via e-mail, mail, or in person, a URL for assessment.
- system 500 may send an e-mail message to a potential applicant, the e-mail message inviting the potential applicant to apply for vacancy 502 by directing a browser to a screening solution URL provided in the e-mail message.
- the website host can provide a link to a web page identified by the screening solution URL.
- Decision 520 may be based on a potential applicant's name, e-mail address, and/or other identifying information.
- Screening solution 524 is administered via the Internet and is hosted at the screening solution URL mentioned above. Screening solution 524 asks screening questions to ascertain if the applicant has the basic qualifications to do the job. These are based on questions typically asked by recruiters but which are statistically validated over time to ensure they are legally defensible and predictive. The questions may include a combination of biodata and personality measures. They may include self-assessments of skill levels appropriate to the job requirements. Screening solution 524 requires applicants to transmit elicited information over the Internet. A possible example of a web-based presentation for screening solution 524 is illustrated in FIG. 6 . Screen shot 600 shows a portion of the presentation.
- screening solution 524 provides applicant feedback 540 and conveys applicant details and screening scores to stack ranked table of applicants 530 .
- Applicant feedback 540 may provide a message to the online applicant indicating that the screening solution is complete, that the applicant has passed or failed the screening stage, and that the applicant may or may not be contacted in due course.
- Other information may also be provided to the applicant in the feedback pages, like a realistic job preview, recruiter phone number, scheduling information, etc.
- system 500 ranks the applicant in comparative order against other applicants in stack ranked table of applicants 530 .
- a certain number or percentage of applicants in table 530 will be chosen for further consideration. For example, the applicants ranking among the top five of all applicants ranked in table 530 may be chosen for advancement in the system at this juncture. Information identifying the chosen applicants will be included on a “short list” as indicated by box 536 .
- the short list chosen at box 536 is transmitted to selection solution 538 , at which the advancing applicants are invited to answer selection questions.
- Selection solution 538 asks additional questions and requires an advancing applicant to input answers.
- the applicant completes selection solution 538 while sitting at a terminal located at one of the company's locations. The terminal communicates over the Internet with a website set up to administer the selection solution.
- applicant feedback 540 is provided from the website to the applicant, and applicant details and scores 541 are incorporated in stack ranked table 530 .
- Feedback 540 may optionally include a sophisticated report on the applicant's strengths and weakness.
- the applicant may then be directed to an appropriate web page chosen by the hiring company. One page may indicated successful completion and a second page may indicate failure.
- the appropriate web page may suggest other openings appropriate to the applicant's test responses and may provide hyperlinks the applicant can use to initiate the application process for these other openings.
- stack ranked table 530 re-ranks the applicants as a result of selection solution 538 , some applicants are invited to participate in interview solution 542 .
- the top three applicants as ranked by table 530 after selection solution 538 may be invited for an in-person interview. Because the selection solution is preferably in instant communication with stack ranked table 530 , the interview invitation may be extended immediately at the conclusion of the selection solution.
- Interview solution 542 is preferably a structured interview, with questions provided via the Internet to the interviewer at the company's location.
- the interviewer reads the provided questions and reports a score over the Internet from the company's location for incorporation in stack ranked table 530 .
- Benchmark performance anchors may assist the interviewer in grading the applicant's responses.
- Interview solution 542 can be designed according two exemplary models.
- an employer is provided with standard interview guides for several job types as well as the competency templates for these types so that the employer can build variations to meet specific needs.
- an employer can build new interview guides and new competency templates.
- the employer has access to the full array of work-related competencies and associated questions in a comprehensive question bank.
- stack ranked table 530 may consider a combination of different biographical, personality, behavioral, and other appropriate information and competencies.
- table 530 may indicate for each applicant a yes/no recommendation, a percentage likelihood of successful job performance, biographical information not used for evaluative purposes, and so forth.
- Stack ranked table 530 may be developed by grading the various solution stages with a computer implementing the following algorithm.
- First search for disqualifying answers to “knock-out” questions.
- Second give points for answers matching those of the previously hired candidates who achieved a successful performance evaluation.
- Third deduct points for answers matching those of the previously hired candidates who received an unsuccessful performance rating.
- Fourth multiply the added or subtracted points by any weighting assigned each question.
- Fifth sum the points for all questions related to a given competency.
- Sixth compare the summed points for each competency to norms of either the job-holders in the company or a wider population. Seventh, predict performance of the applicant as a worker in the job, based on the business outcomes identified by the hiring company and the competencies that contribute to those outcomes.
- a final selection 546 is made based on stack ranked table 530 .
- the selection is transmitted over the Internet to the company, enabling the company to make an offer to the selected applicant(s). For example, if there is only one opening, an offer may be extended to the applicant ranked highest by stack ranked table 530 . If the applicant accepts the offer, the applicant is employed by the company. If the applicant declines, the next highest ranked applicant in stack ranked table 530 is offered the job. If a plural number of openings exist, that number of applicants may be selected off the top of stack ranked table 530 and offered the job. If one of the applicants declines, the next highest ranked applicant in stack ranked table 530 is offered the job. Data from stack ranked table 530 is forwarded to data warehouse 534 .
- performance data for successful applicants are collected at a later date, and sent 548 to data warehouse 534 .
- Data collected at data warehouse 534 are used for research and development and for reporting purposes.
- functions enabled by storing comprehensive data generated by system 500 may include:
- Source of data for designing new solutions including data on the nature of the job and the competencies that are required by the role (job analysis). This data is collected using online assessments.
- system 500 preferably uses instant communications, adaptive testing techniques may be implemented online. An applicant's failure to overcome hurdles in a given solution will deliver a different path through the solution than that of a successful applicant.
- the degree of advancement of a given applicant through system 500 may result in different charges to the company from a solutions provider. For example, a solutions provider that hosts a website supporting screening solution 524 , selection solution 538 , and interview solution 542 may charge the hiring company the following amounts: one dollar for every applicant completing only the screening solution, five dollars for every applicant advancing only to the end of the selection solution, ten dollars for every applicant rejected after the interview solution, twenty dollars for every applicant offered a job, and fifty dollars for every applicant accepting an offer.
- any of the various stages may be skipped, re-ordered, combined with other stages, or eliminated.
- a short telephone interview may be structured early in the process to quickly screen applicants.
- FIG. 7 shows an example of a stack ranked table.
- Computer screen shot 700 illustrates a sample stack ranked table 730 for a customer service job.
- Various tabs permit viewing of data generated by each solution stage.
- Tab 702 reveals data 703 from a screening solution
- tab 704 reveals data 705 from a selection solution
- tab 706 reveals data 707 from an interview solution
- tab 708 reveals all results.
- tab 708 is selected.
- Section 709 of screen shot 700 shows general information about each applicant, including current rank 710 , a link 712 to application information (not shown), last name 714 , first name 716 , and application date 718 .
- Screening solution data 703 includes an indication 720 of whether each applicant successfully passed the knockout requirements for the job.
- Data 703 also includes scores on certain competencies such as educational and work related experience 722 , customer service orientation 724 , and self-confidence 726 .
- Column 728 indicates whether each applicant is recommended to advance beyond the screening stage.
- Selection solution data 705 includes scores on certain competencies such as customer focus 732 , conscientiousness 734 , and problem solving 736 .
- Column 738 indicates whether each applicant is recommended to advance beyond the selection stage.
- Column 740 includes a detailed report for each applicant, while column 750 includes a score.
- Additional information may include columns for storage of data from other decision-making processes such as drug testing, reference checks, or medical exams.
- FIG. 8 shows an example of a screening solution question presented to an applicant taking a screening solution test over the Internet.
- screen shot 800 simulated customer contact record 802 is presented to the applicant.
- the applicant is asked question 804 , and is required to click on a circle next to one of the answers.
- Question 804 may test for a competency in working with information, for example.
- FIG. 9 shows an example of a structured interview guide for use in an interview solution.
- the interview guide is being presented online on a computer screen to an interviewer conducting an interview with an applicant.
- Screen shot 900 shows interview item 902 for a sample customer service job.
- the customer service job opening is for a call center position, and revenue focus has been identified as a relevant and predictive competency.
- Item 902 elicits from the applicant a situation 904 , the applicant's behavior 906 in the situation, and the outcome 908 reported by the applicant.
- the interviewer can grade the applicant's responses to item 902 by marking a score 910 from 1 to 10.
- FIG. 10 illustrates procedural steps that may be followed in a web-based applicant system according to an embodiment of the present invention.
- FIG. 11 illustrates procedural steps that may be followed in a web-based selection solution according to an embodiment of the present invention. For example, these steps may follow those illustrated in FIG. 10 .
- FIG. 12 illustrates procedural steps that may be followed by an employer according to an embodiment of the present invention.
- the following tables provide examples of screening solutions and selection solutions designed for different types of jobs.
- the tables show components (competencies) shown to be relevant to successful performance of each job type. In the tables, some components are considered required, and others are considered optional.
- This component is designed 65 to predict the likelihood that candidates will follow company policies exactly, work in an organized manner, return from meals and breaks in the allotted time, and keep working, even when coworkers are not working.
- Retention Measures commitment 44 Predictor impulsiveness, responsibility, and motivation. It predicts the likelihood that new hire will remain on the job for at least three months.
- Optional Leaning Ability This component measures 54 the tendency to efficiently (12 minute and effectively use numerical timer) and analytical reasoning. This competency is characterized by the ability to learn work-related tasks, processes, and policies.
- Optional Sales Potential Designed to predict the 23 likelihood that candidates will suggest or show alternative solutions based on customer needs, direct conversation toward a commitment/order/sale, show confidence even after a hard refusal/rejection, and strive to close a transaction every time. Screening 15-27 Minutes Required Sales Potential Designed to predict the 60 likelihood that candidates will suggest or show alternative solutions based on customer needs, direct conversation toward a commitment/order/sale, show confidence even after a hard refusal/rejection, and strive to close a transaction every time.
- Customer Focus Designed to predict the 32 likelihood that candidates will show persistent enthusiasm in customer interaction, apologize knowingly inconveniences to customers, be patient with customers, tolerate rude customers calmly, and search for information or products for customers.
- Optional Learning Ability This component measures 54 the tendency to efficiently (12 minute and effectively use numerical timer) and analytical reasoning. This competency is characterized by the ability to learn work-related tasks, processes, and policies.
- This component is designed 32 to predict the likelihood that candidates will show persistent enthusiasm in customer interaction, apologize hereby for inconveniences to customers, be patient with customers, tolerate rude customers calmly, and search for information or products for customers.
- Conscientiousness This component is designed 65 to predict the likelihood that candidates will follow company policies exactly, work in an organized manner, return from meals and breaks in the allotted time, and keep working, even when coworkers are not working.
- Working with This component is designed 30 information to predict success in (15 customer service call-center minutes jobs by assessing a timer) candidate's ability to retrieve information and use it in order to solve problems.
- Optional Retention Measures commitment, 44 Predictor impulsiveness, responsibility, and motivation. It predicts the likelihood that a new hire will remain on the job for at least three months.
- Optional Sales Potential Designed to predict the 23 likelihood that candidates will suggest or show alternative solutions based on customer needs, direct conversation toward a commitment/order/sale, show confidence even after a hard refusal/rejection, and strive to close a transaction every time.
- Screening 30 Minutes Required Sales Focus Designed to predict the 60 likelihood that candidates will suggest or show alternative solutions based on customer needs, direct conversation toward a commitment/order/sale, show confidence even after a hard refusal/rejection, and strive to close a transaction every time.
- Customer Focus Designed to predict the 32 likelihood that candidates will show persistent enthusiasm in customer interaction, apology knowingly for inconveniences to customers, be patient with customers, tolerate rude customers calmly, and search for information or products for customers.
- Working with This component is designed 30 Information to predict success in (15 minute customer service call-center timer) jobs by assessing a candidate's ability to retrieve information and use it in order to solve problems.
- High scorers are likely to persuade and influence others, gain commitment, and build effective interpersonal relationships. They also have potential to develop skills in the area of employee relations, coaching, motivating, and leading a team.
- Optional Decision Measures the tendency to 10 Making/Problem efficiently and effectively Solving use numerical and analytical reasoning. This competency is characterized by the ability to solve complex problems, and make reasoned decisions.
- Optional Communication Measures the tendency to 10 efficiently and effectively use verbal reasoning. This competency is characterized by the ability to verbally explain complex information to others.
- High scorers are likely to have or learn good planning and organizing skills, be innovative, consider issues from multiple perspectives, and create strategies to build their business.
- Decision Measures the tendency to 10 Making/Problem efficiently and effectively Solving use numerical and analytical reasoning. This competency is characterized by the ability to solve complex problems, and make reasoned decisions.
- High scorers are likely to persuade and influence others, gain commitment, and build effective interpersonal relationships. They also have potential to develop skills in the areas of employee relations, coaching, motivating, and leading a team.
- Optional Decision Measures the tendency to 10 Making/Problem efficiently and effectively Solving use numerical and analytical reasoning. This competency is characterized by the ability to solve complex problems, and make reasoned decisions.
- Optional Communication Measures the tendency to 10 efficiently and effectively use verbal reasoning. This competency is characterized by the ability to verbally explain complex information to others.
- High scorers are likely to have or learn good planning and organizing skills, be innovative, consider issues from multiple perspectives, and create strategies to build their business.
- Decision Measures the tendency to 10 Making/Problem efficiently and effectively Solving use numerical and analytical reasoning. This competency is characterized by the ability to solve complex problems, and make reasoned decisions.
- Self-Leadership Measures the candidate's 34 ability to control emotions, act with integrity, take responsibility for actions, and tolerate stress. High scorers are also likely to have a positive attitude, be optimistic about the future, and demonstrate high levels of professionalism. Interpersonal Measures the candidate's 41 Leadership interpersonal characteristics. High scorers are likely to persuade and influence others, gain commitment, and build effective interpersonal relationships. They also have potential to develop skills in the areas of employee relations, coaching, motivating, and leading a team. Decision Measures the tendency to 10 Making/Problem efficiently and effectively Solving use numerical and analytical reasoning. This competency is characterized by the ability to solve complex problems, and make reasoned decisions. Optional Communication Measures the tendency to 10 efficiently and effectively use verbal reasoning. This competency is characterized by the ability to verbally explain complex information to others.
- High scorers are likely to have or learn good planning and organizing skills, be innovative, consider issues from multiple perspectives, and create strategies to build their business.
- Optional Decision Measures the tendency to 10 Making/Problem efficiently and effectively Solving use numerical and analytical reasoning. This competency is characterized by the ability to solve complex problems, and make reasoned decisions.
- Scores on Critical Thinking are derived from candidates' responses to information provided in the form of brief passages.
- Problem Solving Measure the ability to analyze and evaluate information.
- Scores on Problem Solving are derived from candidates' responses to mathematical and analytical reasoning items, requiring candidates to respond to facts and figures presented in various scenarios.
- Communication Measures the ability to efficiently use verbal information.
- Scores on Communication are derived from candidates' ability to identify synonyms.
- Spatial Ability Measure the ability to visually manipulate objects. Scores on Spatial Ability are derived from candidates' ability to correctly identify the number of blocks in progressively difficult figures.
- FIG. 13 illustrates a human capital management life-cycle. Measurement and data 1301 is initially used in the context of recruiting 1302 . For recruiting 1302 , screening, selection, and interview solutions measure applicants' competencies and predict on-the-job performance and thus contribution to business outcomes.
- data about potential can be weighed against performance data to ensure that high potential employees who are on difficult assignments where they are structurally constrained from succeeding are not underpaid by pure focus on performance.
- structural constraints may include business environments, poor staff, unreliable equipment, etc.
- the system van be used to enhance the validity of employee performance evaluation.
- a company may test current employees in order to design executive training programs addressing each individual's strengths and weaknesses. Or, for employees that took a test and were hired despite weaknesses, the data can be used to structure appropriate training.
- data on employees may be collected in the process of organization mergers to assist planning for retrenchment or change. Also, by measuring competencies and mapping them between roles, it is possible to assess the potential that an individual may have for a role other than the job they are currently holding, such as for a promotion or a transfer to another area.
Abstract
Description
- This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/878,245, filed Jun. 12, 2001, which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 60/211,044, filed Jun. 12, 2000.
- To prevent discrimination in job hiring and promotion, in 1978 the U.S. Federal Government established rigorous standards known as the “Uniform Guidelines” for the use of testing and screening instruments used to distinguish among candidates for a given position. (41 CFR §§ 60-3). These standards are designed to prevent testing and screening instruments from creating an adverse impact on any minority or protected groups during the hiring or promotion of employees.
- Over the last twenty years, a number of test booklets have been developed and published by various publishers in compliance with the “Uniform Guidelines.” One example is the Customer Service & Clerical Potential Inventory (“CSCPI”) developed by Richardson, Bellows, Henry and Co., Inc. The CSCPI is unlike most other tests in that responses are not right or wrong in the traditional sense. Instead, the performance of the group picking each individual item alternative has been statistically correlated across large samples of potential and actual employees for a position so as to create a test that can produce a total score for that position. This total score may legally be used as a factor in the hiring or promotion process.
- With the advances in computer systems and the advent of the Internet, many different aspects of human resources management have been computerized, including online recruiting. In large part due to the rigorous standards imposed by the “Uniform Guidelines,” such online recruiting systems use only certain minimum candidate qualifications (e.g., college level degree, possesses a driver's license, number of years experience for a skill) as a way of identifying potential candidates for a position. It has generally been accepted in the human resources profession that choosing among potential candidates based only on minimum candidate qualifications will not run afoul of the rigorous standards imposed by the “Uniform Guidelines”.
- Accordingly, it would be desirable to provide a computer-implemented system for human resources management that could overcome these limitations and provide further advantages in the testing and/or evaluating employees or potential employees.
- The present invention is an electronic prediction system for assessing a suitability of job applicants for an employer. The electronic prediction system includes a plurality of terminals connected to the Internet, an applicant screening server connected through the Internet to the terminals that has a testing computer program that stores test data. A website identified is configured to present application questions to the applicants at the terminals and to receive applicant responses entered at the terminals in response to presentation of the application questions. The application questions include requirements questions eliciting information on whether the applicants meet employment requirements and a set of validated questions validated by correlating job performance ratings of a plurality of hired workers with previous responses given by the workers to the application questions before the workers were hired. The set of validated questions is a short subset of a large assessment selected to serve as a fast job-related pre-screen. A scoring system automatically scores the applicant responses in real time. The scoring system compares the applicant responses for requirements questions to employer requirements and being validated to predict both performance and turnover potential. A scoring database is connected to the applicant screening server. An applicant input system located on the employer's premises is configured to administer an in-depth assessment to an applicant at the employer's premises after the applicant has come to the employer's premises and logged on. A viewing system permits the employer to view applicant results from the electronic prediction system and the applicant's rank order, the applicant results providing information on applicants who have a high probability of performing successfully and not terminating early
-
FIG. 1 provides a block diagram of an exemplary system in accordance with the present invention. -
FIG. 2 illustrates a process for testing and evaluating job applicants in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention. -
FIG. 3 depicts a hiring procedure in accordance with one embodiment of the invention. -
FIG. 4 is a block diagram of a process employing feedback. -
FIG. 5 diagrams an online system in accordance with one embodiment of the invention. -
FIG. 6 shows an example of a web-based presentation for a screening solution. -
FIG. 7 shows an example of a stack ranked table. -
FIG. 8 shows an example of a screening solution question presented to an applicant taking a screening solution test over the Internet. -
FIG. 9 shows an example of a structured interview guide for use in an interview solution. -
FIG. 10 illustrates procedural steps that may be followed in a web-based applicant system according to an embodiment of the present invention. -
FIG. 11 illustrates procedural steps that may be followed in a web-based selection solution according to an embodiment of the present invention. -
FIG. 12 illustrates procedural steps that may be followed by an employer according to an embodiment of the present invention. -
FIG. 13 illustrates a human capital management life-cycle. - A system for testing a job applicant provides a computerized stack ranking of multiple applicants, predictive of the comparative levels of successful job performance. The predictive stack ranking may be used as a dynamic interactive filter with a pool of applicants over the course of the evaluation or employment process. The system may utilize a communications network to communicate between an applicant terminal and a system server.
- The system may be used for example for screening, selecting, retaining, assigning, or analyzing the job applicant. The job applicant can for example be a new job applicant, an employee seeking to retain a job, an employee seeking a different job in the same organization, or an employee being evaluated for retention, re-assignment, or promotion. Applicants may or may not know they are being evaluated.
- Once an applicant becomes an employee, the system may collect data regarding the employee for use in a feedback loop informing the online hiring process and improving the accuracy of the predictive stack ranking. For example, the data may indicate the employer's rating of the employee's actual job performance. Such a rating can be cross-checked against the answers that the employee gave during the application process. The cross-checking can be used as feedback to refine the questions and evaluation criteria used at each stage of the hiring process. For example, the cross-checking may be analyzed to select from among many questions, a small subset having high predictive value. The small subset can then be used in a quick initial screening stage. Or, the small subset can be given greater weight than other questions in a computerized stack ranking of candidates.
-
FIG. 1 provides a block diagram of an exemplary system in accordance with the present invention. A job applicant can useapplicant terminal 102 to communicate overnetwork 104 withsystem server 106.Applicant terminal 102 may for example be a telephone handset, a personal computer, a workstation, a handheld wireless device such as those marketed under the trademarks PALM or HANDSPRING, or a Wireless Application Protocol enabled device such as a mobile phone. Network 104 may for example be the Internet, the World Wide Web, a wide area network, a local area network, a telephone network, a wireless communication network, a combination thereof, or any other link capable of carrying communications between an applicant terminal and a server. -
System server 106 employs atesting computer program 108 and has access to ascoring database 110.System server 106 communicates withapplicant terminal 102 in accordance with instructions from testingcomputer program 108. -
System server 106 may communicate withemployer server 112 overnetwork 104 or overdirect link 114.System server 106 is shown as a unitary server, but may be a distributed computing platform. - An applicant terminal may be remote from, or co-located with,
system server 106 and/oremployer server 112. For example,applicant terminal 102 may be located at a job applicant's home,applicant terminal 116 may be located at a job fair or employment office, andapplicant terminal 120 may be located at an employer's location. -
Partner server 121 may be linked tonetwork 104 andsystem server 106 to facilitate integration of a business partner seeking to participate in the system ofFIG. 1 . -
System server 106 may pose questions to a job applicant located at an applicant terminal, receive responses from the job applicant, and score the answers in accordance with scoringdatabase 110. The scoring may take place in real time, i.e., while the applicant is still online, and may be reported in the form of a comparative stack ranking of multiple applicants. The stack ranking may be delivered fromsystem server 106, over eithernetwork 104 ordirect link 114, toemployer server 112. - Scoring of each answer by
system server 106 may be instant, i.e., before the next question is answered. Thus, adaptive testing techniques may be implemented overnetwork 104. For example, the answers given by an applicant atapplicant terminal 102 to questions propounded early in a test may determine which questions are propounded bysystem server 106 to the applicant later in the same test. In addition, if an applicant atterminal 102 provides an unacceptable answer to a disqualifying “knock-out” question,server 106 may immediately terminate the test. - These same adaptive testing principles may be applied to a software program used to support a real time interview, either in person or over a communications network. For example, an employer conducting an oral interview in person or over a telephone can enter a candidate's oral answer into
employer terminal 124, which then communicates the answer tosystem server 106, which in turn suggests viaemployer terminal 124 the next question for the employer to ask the interviewee. - The system may test an online applicant for any competency desired, in any sequence. The tested competencies may be abilities, traits, knowledge, skills, etc., that have been proven relevant to and predictive of successful job performance. By way of example and not limitation, the following competencies may be tested:
- 1. dependability
- 2. agreeableness
- 3. critical thinking
- 4. problem solving ability
- 5. talkativeness
- 6. assertiveness
- 7. gregariousness
- 8. persuasiveness
- 9. achievement
- 10. education
- 11. experience
- 12. customer service orientation
- 13. customer focus
- 14. conscientiousness
- 15. self-confidence
- 16. motivation
- 17. revenue focus
- 18. cognitive ability
- 19. leadership
- 20. decision making
- 21. flexibility
- 22. commitment
- 23. learning ability
- 24. dedication
- 25. tenacity
- 26. number of jobs held
- 27. length of time in job(s)
- 28. working with information
- 29. supervisory potential
- 30. judgment
- 31. leadership
- 32. coaching skills
- 33. teamwork
- 34. interpersonal skills
- 35. business leadership
- 36. leadership motivation
- 37. self-leadership
- 38. interpersonal leadership
- 39. communication skills
- 40. management potential
- 41. likelihood of retention
- 42. self-control
- 43. energy
- 44. executive potential
- 45. listening orientation
- 46. language skills (English, etc.)
- 47. verbal reasoning
- 48. spatial ability
- 49. interest
- 50. motivation
- Typically,
system server 106 tests for certain ones of the competencies that have been proven to be predictive of successful performance of the type of job for which the applicant is being considered. The results of the testing are tabulated in a stack ranked table. The stack ranked table may rank a number of applicants against each other and list them in order, from first to last. The table may also present other information for each applicant. The other information may include, by way of example and not limitation: - 1. Name
- 2. Identifying number (e.g. social security number).
- 3. Score achieved at various stages for various competencies.
- 4. Recommendation (or not) to continue the hiring process beyond each stage
- 5. Link to application information (e.g. address, resume details)
- 6. Contact information (phone number, e-mail address, mailing address, etc.)
- 7. Date of application
- 8. Success or failure in complying with knockout requirements for the job
- 9. Screening solution scores, presented as percentiles
- 10. A calculated recommendation to proceed or not to proceed with the applicant
- 11. Results (by competency) of the selection solution
- 12. Link to allow manual entry of the test answers if not done on computer directly by the applicant
- 13. A calculated recommendation to hire or not hire based on a weighted overall score of selection competencies (or other factors the hiring company wishes to use and that are approved as statistically valid and legally defensible)
- 14. Additional columns for storage of data from a structured behavioral interview
- 15. Additional columns for storage of data from other decision-making processes such as drug testing, reference checks, or medical exams.
- A process for testing and evaluating job applicants may be described with reference to
FIG. 2 . Generally, applicant testing 201 includes providing a test to a job applicant and scoring the applicant's answers. The test may be administered online or it may be administered manually off-line. Scores are entered into a system for calculating a stack ranked table. Predictive stack ranking 202 generally includes ranking a job applicant against other job applicants in order from first to last or other comparative ranking. The other job applicants may be current job applicants, past job applicants, or fictional job applicants. -
FIG. 3 depicts a hiring procedure in accordance with one embodiment of the invention.Announcement 302 may be an online job announcement such as a web page with an “apply now” hyperlink icon. The web page may reside on an employer's website or an employment agency website, for example. Or, an online job announcement may be a recorded announcement on a menu-driven telephone voice processing system. Alternatively,announcement 302 may be an offline job announcement such as a newspaper advertisement. - In response to
announcement 302, an interested job applicant requests administration ofscreening test 304.Screening test 304 may be remotely administered and scored online, i.e., unproctored, with the scores being automatically provided to correlation andpredictive stack ranking 306. Alternatively,screening test 304 may be administered manually with paper and pencil, and then graded by hand or machine, with the scores being provided to correlation andpredictive stack ranking 306. The predictive stack ranking may for example be constructed bysystem server 106 oremployer server 112. - Correlation and predictive stack ranking 306 totals the graded answers according to particular competencies known to be relevant to successful job performance. In a preferred embodiment, the questions to be asked at the various stages are selected for a particular type of job being offered in accordance with a proven relationship with desired business outcomes. Business outcomes can for example include: level of sales, customer satisfaction, quality measures such as fault rates, retention and tenure of employment, time keeping, learning ability, progression to more senior roles over time, and supervisor ratings of behavioral success. The particular type of job is defined in conjunction with the U.S. Department of Labor “O*NET” classification system. Some types of jobs might include customer service, technical, professional, or managerial. Various competencies are determined to be associated with desired business outcomes for a given type of job. These competencies are tested for at various solution stages with appropriate questions.
- The appropriate competencies, questions, scoring, weighting, and ranking factors for a new job can be designed from historical tests for existing jobs, by applying statistical techniques and using the gathering of data on the Internet to ensure rapid validation of the new assessment solution. Confirmatory job analysis is used to determine the appropriateness of solutions for a particular job.
- Correlation and predictive stack ranking 306 may be administered by a computer processor located at
system server 106, for example. Predictive stack ranking 306 may give different weight to different questions, and may at any stage immediately disqualify an applicant providing an unacceptable answer to a “knock-out” question. Correlation and predictive stack ranking 306 may rank the applicant in order against other job applicants in a table. Correlation and predictive stack ranking 306 may be used to decide which applicants to invite for the next stage,selection test 308. -
Selection test 308 is preferably conducted under supervised conditions, i.e., proctored. For example,selection test 308 may be administered in person. An in-person test may take place at a job fair, an employer's location, a job site, or an employment agency. An in-person test may include verification of the job applicant's identity, such as by examination of a photo identification document produced by a test-taker.Selection test 308 may be administered online or manually. Supervised conditions typically include observation of the test-taker during administration of the test. The answers toselection test 308 are graded and the results are incorporated in correlation and stackranking 306. - Correlation and predictive stack ranking 306 may then update a previously created entry for the applicant and rank or re-rank the applicant in order against other job applicants. After this is accomplished, the highest ranking applicants may be invited for
interview 310. -
Interview 310 may be structured or unstructured, online or in person. Ifinterview 310 is structured, a program leads the interviewer through the interview by suggesting questions one at a time. The program may be a list of questions written on paper or it may be a computer program resident for example insystem server 106. The program suggests questions that are predetermined to be valid, i.e., proven to be associated with successful job performance and legally permitted. The interviewer can input the answers and/or a score for the answers, either after each answer or at the conclusion of the interview. This can be done viaemployer terminal 124, for example. -
Interview 310 results in an interview score being provided to correlation andpredictive stack ranking 306. Correlation and predictive stack ranking 306 is revised to reflect the interview score. In particular, the relative rank of the job applicants is reassessed. -
FIG. 4 is a block diagram of a process employing feedback.Test design 402 is initially performed using industry-accepted standards.Test administration 404 tests and scores job applicants and/or incumbents.Employee performance evaluation 406 measures actual job performance of the applicant or incumbent after holding the job for a period of time. This information is fed back totest design 402 and/ortest administration 404.Test design 402 may be revised to delete questions which were not predictive of successful job performance. This can be done for example by deleting questions whose answers bore no relation toperformance evaluation 406 for a statistically valid sample.Test administration 404 may be revised by adjusting the weight given to certain questions or answers that showed an especially strong correlation toemployee performance evaluation 406. For example, iftest administration 404 is associated with correlation and predictive stack ranking 306, feedback fromemployee performance evaluation 406 may help determine how various job applicants are comparatively ranked against each other. -
FIG. 5 diagrams an online computer basedsystem 500 in accordance with one embodiment of the invention.Box 502 represents a job vacancy with a requirement for an online screening and selection solution. The vacancy can come to the attention of a potential job applicant in a number of ways. - For example,
box 504 represents an online application via a hiring company's own website. A company offering a job may post a vacancy announcement on the company's website and invite job seekers to apply by clicking on an icon labeled “apply here” or the like.Box 506 represents a similar posting on an online job board.Box 508 represents candidates given a Uniform Resource Locator (URL) directly by the company. This may occur when the company offering a job identifies a potential candidate.Box 510 represents a media advertisement including a URL for a job. Thus, job seekers observing the advertisement can direct their browsers to the indicated URL. - At job fair 512, job seekers may be provided a URL associated with the company or the particular vacancy. Paper-and-pencil measures could also be used at job fairs and entered into the system. A computer terminal may be provided for use of job seekers at job fair 512, enabling job seekers to participate in the online system.
Box 514 represents an executive search via a recruiter network. Job seekers relevant to the search are identified in recruitmentfirm applicant database 516.Database 516 can link to a URL associated with the job. - Preferably, no matter how a potential applicant becomes aware of or identified for a job opening in
system 500, the potential applicant is considered atdecision 520.Decision 520 asks whether applicant has completed the requiredscreening solution 524. If not, the applicant atbox 522 is given via e-mail, mail, or in person, a URL for assessment. For example,system 500 may send an e-mail message to a potential applicant, the e-mail message inviting the potential applicant to apply forvacancy 502 by directing a browser to a screening solution URL provided in the e-mail message. Alternatively, when a potential applicant is visiting a website at whichdecision 520 determines that the required screening solution has not been completed, the website host can provide a link to a web page identified by the screening solution URL.Decision 520 may be based on a potential applicant's name, e-mail address, and/or other identifying information. -
Screening solution 524 is administered via the Internet and is hosted at the screening solution URL mentioned above.Screening solution 524 asks screening questions to ascertain if the applicant has the basic qualifications to do the job. These are based on questions typically asked by recruiters but which are statistically validated over time to ensure they are legally defensible and predictive. The questions may include a combination of biodata and personality measures. They may include self-assessments of skill levels appropriate to the job requirements.Screening solution 524 requires applicants to transmit elicited information over the Internet. A possible example of a web-based presentation forscreening solution 524 is illustrated inFIG. 6 . Screen shot 600 shows a portion of the presentation. - Once completed,
screening solution 524 providesapplicant feedback 540 and conveys applicant details and screening scores to stack ranked table ofapplicants 530.Applicant feedback 540 may provide a message to the online applicant indicating that the screening solution is complete, that the applicant has passed or failed the screening stage, and that the applicant may or may not be contacted in due course. Other information may also be provided to the applicant in the feedback pages, like a realistic job preview, recruiter phone number, scheduling information, etc. - Once an applicant has completed the screening solution,
system 500 ranks the applicant in comparative order against other applicants in stack ranked table ofapplicants 530. A certain number or percentage of applicants in table 530 will be chosen for further consideration. For example, the applicants ranking among the top five of all applicants ranked in table 530 may be chosen for advancement in the system at this juncture. Information identifying the chosen applicants will be included on a “short list” as indicated bybox 536. - The short list chosen at
box 536 is transmitted toselection solution 538, at which the advancing applicants are invited to answer selection questions.Selection solution 538 asks additional questions and requires an advancing applicant to input answers. Preferably, the applicant completesselection solution 538 while sitting at a terminal located at one of the company's locations. The terminal communicates over the Internet with a website set up to administer the selection solution. - At the conclusion of
selection solution 538,applicant feedback 540 is provided from the website to the applicant, and applicant details andscores 541 are incorporated in stack ranked table 530.Feedback 540 may optionally include a sophisticated report on the applicant's strengths and weakness. The applicant may then be directed to an appropriate web page chosen by the hiring company. One page may indicated successful completion and a second page may indicate failure. The appropriate web page may suggest other openings appropriate to the applicant's test responses and may provide hyperlinks the applicant can use to initiate the application process for these other openings. - Once stack ranked table 530 re-ranks the applicants as a result of
selection solution 538, some applicants are invited to participate ininterview solution 542. For example, the top three applicants as ranked by table 530 afterselection solution 538 may be invited for an in-person interview. Because the selection solution is preferably in instant communication with stack ranked table 530, the interview invitation may be extended immediately at the conclusion of the selection solution. -
Interview solution 542 is preferably a structured interview, with questions provided via the Internet to the interviewer at the company's location. The interviewer reads the provided questions and reports a score over the Internet from the company's location for incorporation in stack ranked table 530. Benchmark performance anchors may assist the interviewer in grading the applicant's responses. -
Interview solution 542 can be designed according two exemplary models. In a first model, an employer is provided with standard interview guides for several job types as well as the competency templates for these types so that the employer can build variations to meet specific needs. In a second model, an employer can build new interview guides and new competency templates. In the second model, the employer has access to the full array of work-related competencies and associated questions in a comprehensive question bank. - In ranking applicants, stack ranked table 530 may consider a combination of different biographical, personality, behavioral, and other appropriate information and competencies. In addition to the comparative ranking, table 530 may indicate for each applicant a yes/no recommendation, a percentage likelihood of successful job performance, biographical information not used for evaluative purposes, and so forth.
- Stack ranked table 530 may be developed by grading the various solution stages with a computer implementing the following algorithm. First, search for disqualifying answers to “knock-out” questions. Second, give points for answers matching those of the previously hired candidates who achieved a successful performance evaluation. Third, deduct points for answers matching those of the previously hired candidates who received an unsuccessful performance rating. Fourth, multiply the added or subtracted points by any weighting assigned each question. Fifth, sum the points for all questions related to a given competency. Sixth, compare the summed points for each competency to norms of either the job-holders in the company or a wider population. Seventh, predict performance of the applicant as a worker in the job, based on the business outcomes identified by the hiring company and the competencies that contribute to those outcomes.
- A
final selection 546 is made based on stack ranked table 530. Preferably, the selection is transmitted over the Internet to the company, enabling the company to make an offer to the selected applicant(s). For example, if there is only one opening, an offer may be extended to the applicant ranked highest by stack ranked table 530. If the applicant accepts the offer, the applicant is employed by the company. If the applicant declines, the next highest ranked applicant in stack ranked table 530 is offered the job. If a plural number of openings exist, that number of applicants may be selected off the top of stack ranked table 530 and offered the job. If one of the applicants declines, the next highest ranked applicant in stack ranked table 530 is offered the job. Data from stack ranked table 530 is forwarded todata warehouse 534. - The performance of successful applicants is monitored during their employment. At
box 550, performance data for successful applicants are collected at a later date, and sent 548 todata warehouse 534. - Data collected at
data warehouse 534 are used for research and development and for reporting purposes. For example, functions enabled by storing comprehensive data generated bysystem 500 may include: - Storage of question level responses from applicants for jobs. This can be used for re-checking of applicant information (auditing etc.) and for research to develop new solutions and questions.
- Reporting on Equal Employment Opportunity Commission requirements. Data on ethnicity etc. can be stored to enable an employer to comply with reporting requirements to government agencies.
- Source of data for designing new solutions including data on the nature of the job and the competencies that are required by the role (job analysis). This data is collected using online assessments.
- Source of data for statistical research on correlation between the solutions and their predicted outcomes for applicants, and the actual outcomes for employees who were hired (validation studies).
- Design of solutions other than recruitment related solutions.
- Reporting of usage volumes for billing and financing accounting purposes.
- Because
system 500 preferably uses instant communications, adaptive testing techniques may be implemented online. An applicant's failure to overcome hurdles in a given solution will deliver a different path through the solution than that of a successful applicant. The degree of advancement of a given applicant throughsystem 500 may result in different charges to the company from a solutions provider. For example, a solutions provider that hosts a website supportingscreening solution 524,selection solution 538, andinterview solution 542 may charge the hiring company the following amounts: one dollar for every applicant completing only the screening solution, five dollars for every applicant advancing only to the end of the selection solution, ten dollars for every applicant rejected after the interview solution, twenty dollars for every applicant offered a job, and fifty dollars for every applicant accepting an offer. - In practice, any of the various stages (
screening solution 524,selection solution 538, and interview solution 542) may be skipped, re-ordered, combined with other stages, or eliminated. Or, a short telephone interview may be structured early in the process to quickly screen applicants. -
FIG. 7 shows an example of a stack ranked table. Computer screen shot 700 illustrates a sample stack ranked table 730 for a customer service job. Various tabs permit viewing of data generated by each solution stage.Tab 702 revealsdata 703 from a screening solution,tab 704 revealsdata 705 from a selection solution,tab 706 revealsdata 707 from an interview solution, andtab 708 reveals all results. In screen shot 700,tab 708 is selected. -
Section 709 of screen shot 700 shows general information about each applicant, including current rank 710, a link 712 to application information (not shown), last name 714, first name 716, and application date 718. -
Screening solution data 703 includes anindication 720 of whether each applicant successfully passed the knockout requirements for the job.Data 703 also includes scores on certain competencies such as educational and work related experience 722, customer service orientation 724, and self-confidence 726.Column 728 indicates whether each applicant is recommended to advance beyond the screening stage. -
Selection solution data 705 includes scores on certain competencies such ascustomer focus 732,conscientiousness 734, and problem solving 736.Column 738 indicates whether each applicant is recommended to advance beyond the selection stage.Column 740 includes a detailed report for each applicant, whilecolumn 750 includes a score. - Additional information (not shown) may include columns for storage of data from other decision-making processes such as drug testing, reference checks, or medical exams.
-
FIG. 8 shows an example of a screening solution question presented to an applicant taking a screening solution test over the Internet. In screen shot 800, simulatedcustomer contact record 802 is presented to the applicant. The applicant is askedquestion 804, and is required to click on a circle next to one of the answers.Question 804 may test for a competency in working with information, for example. -
FIG. 9 shows an example of a structured interview guide for use in an interview solution. As illustrated, the interview guide is being presented online on a computer screen to an interviewer conducting an interview with an applicant. Screen shot 900 showsinterview item 902 for a sample customer service job. The customer service job opening is for a call center position, and revenue focus has been identified as a relevant and predictive competency.Item 902 elicits from the applicant asituation 904, the applicant'sbehavior 906 in the situation, and theoutcome 908 reported by the applicant. The interviewer can grade the applicant's responses toitem 902 by marking ascore 910 from 1 to 10. -
FIG. 10 illustrates procedural steps that may be followed in a web-based applicant system according to an embodiment of the present invention. -
FIG. 11 illustrates procedural steps that may be followed in a web-based selection solution according to an embodiment of the present invention. For example, these steps may follow those illustrated inFIG. 10 . -
FIG. 12 illustrates procedural steps that may be followed by an employer according to an embodiment of the present invention. - The following tables provide examples of screening solutions and selection solutions designed for different types of jobs. The tables show components (competencies) shown to be relevant to successful performance of each job type. In the tables, some components are considered required, and others are considered optional.
-
TABLE ONE Entry/General Skilled Solutions Solution Component Definition Items Screening 7-10 Minutes Required Educational and Measures potential for 15 Work-Related success in entry-level jobs Experience across industry type and functional area. Scores on Education and Work-Related Experience are derived from candidates' responses to questions regarding developmental influences, self-esteem, work history and work-related values and attitudes. Self-Confidence This component references: 7 belief in one's own abilities and skills and a tendency to feel competent in several areas. Optional Decision Measures potential for 8 Making/ success in entry level Flexibility positions. Scores on Decision Making and Flexibility are derived from candidates' responses to questions regarding developmental influences, self-esteem, work history and work-related values and attitudes. Screening 23-35 Minutes Required Conscientiousness This component is designed 65 to predict the likelihood that candidates will follow company policies exactly, work in an organized manner, return from meals and breaks in the allotted time, and keep working, even when coworkers are not working. Retention Measures commitment, 44 Predictor impulsiveness, responsibility, and motivation. It predicts the likelihood that new hire will remain on the job for at least three months. Optional Leaning Ability This component measures 54 the tendency to efficiently (12 minute and effectively use numerical timer) and analytical reasoning. This competency is characterized by the ability to learn work-related tasks, processes, and policies. -
TABLE TWO Customer Service Solution Solution Component Definition Items Screening 8-10 Minutes Required Educational and Measures potential for 15 Work-Related success in customer service Experience jobs. Scores on Education and Work-Related Experience are derived from candidates responses to questions regarding developmental influences, self-esteem, work history and work-related values and attitudes. Customer Service Designed to predict the 20 Orientation likelihood that candidates will show persistent enthusiasm in customer interaction, apologize sincerely for inconveniences to customers, be patient with customers, tolerate rude customers calmly, and search for information or products for customers. Optional Self-Confidence This component references; 7 belief in one's own abilities and skills and a tendency to feel competent in several areas. Screening 17-29-27 Minutes Required Customer Focus Designed to predict the 32 likelihood that candidates will show persistent enthusiasm in customer interaction, apologize incerely for inconveniences to customers, be patient with customers, tolerate rude customers calmly, and search for information or products for customers. Conscientiousness This component is designed 65 to predict the likelihood that candidates will follow company policies exactly, work in an organized manner, return from meals and breaks in the allotted time, and keep working, even when coworkers are not working. Optional Learning Ability This component measures 54 the tendency to efficiently (12 minute and effectively use numerical timer) and analytical reasoning. This competency is characterized by the ability to learn work-related tasks, processes, and policies. Optional Retention Measures commitment, 44 Predictor impulsiveness, responsibility, and motivation. It predicts the likelihood that a new hire will remain on the job for at least three months -
TABLE THREE Customer Service Solution: Sales Positions Solution Component Definition Items Screening 9-15 Minutes Required Educational and Measures potential for 15 Work-Related success in customer service Experience jobs. Scores on Education and Work-Related Experience are derived from candidates responses to questions regarding developmental influences, self-esteem, work history and work-related values and attitudes. Customer Service This component is designed 20 Orientation to predict the likelihood that candidates will show persistent enthusiasm in customer interaction, apologize sincerely for inconveniences to customers, be patient with customers, tolerate rude customers calmly, and search for information or products for customers. Optional Sales Potential Designed to predict the 23 likelihood that candidates will suggest or show alternative solutions based on customer needs, direct conversation toward a commitment/order/sale, show confidence even after a hard refusal/rejection, and strive to close a transaction every time. Screening 15-27 Minutes Required Sales Potential Designed to predict the 60 likelihood that candidates will suggest or show alternative solutions based on customer needs, direct conversation toward a commitment/order/sale, show confidence even after a hard refusal/rejection, and strive to close a transaction every time. Customer Focus Designed to predict the 32 likelihood that candidates will show persistent enthusiasm in customer interaction, apologize sincerely inconveniences to customers, be patient with customers, tolerate rude customers calmly, and search for information or products for customers. Optional Learning Ability This component measures 54 the tendency to efficiently (12 minute and effectively use numerical timer) and analytical reasoning. This competency is characterized by the ability to learn work-related tasks, processes, and policies. -
TABLE FOUR Customer Service Solution: Call Center Positions Solution Component Definition Items Screening 9-11 minutes Required Educational and Measures potential for 15 Work-Related success in customer service Experience jobs. Scores on Education and Work-Related Experience are derived from candidates responses to questions regarding developmental influences, self-esteem, work history and work-related values and attitudes. Customer Service Designed to predict the 20 Orientation likelihood that candidates will show persistent enthusiasm in customer interaction, apologize sincerely for inconveniences to customers, be patient with customers, tolerate rude customers calmly, and search for information or products for customers. Optional Self-Confidence This component references: 7 belief in one's own abilities and skills and a tendency to feel competent in several areas. Screening 16-31-39 Minutes Required Customer Focus This component is designed 32 to predict the likelihood that candidates will show persistent enthusiasm in customer interaction, apologize sincerely for inconveniences to customers, be patient with customers, tolerate rude customers calmly, and search for information or products for customers. Conscientiousness This component is designed 65 to predict the likelihood that candidates will follow company policies exactly, work in an organized manner, return from meals and breaks in the allotted time, and keep working, even when coworkers are not working. Working with This component is designed 30 information to predict success in (15 customer service call-center minutes jobs by assessing a timer) candidate's ability to retrieve information and use it in order to solve problems. Optional Retention Measures commitment, 44 Predictor impulsiveness, responsibility, and motivation. It predicts the likelihood that a new hire will remain on the job for at least three months. -
TABLE FIVE Customer Service Solution: Call Center Sales Positions Solution Component Definition Items Screening 9-15 Minutes Required Educational and Measures potential for 15 Work-Related success in customer service Experience jobs. Scores on Education and Work-Related Experience are derived from candidates' responses to questions regarding developmental influences, self-esteem, work history and work-related values and attitudes. Customer Service Designed to predict the 20 Orientation likelihood that candidates will show persistent enthusiasm in customer interaction, apologize sincerely for inconveniences to customers, be patient with customers, tolerate rude customers calmly, and search for information or products for customers. Optional Sales Potential Designed to predict the 23 likelihood that candidates will suggest or show alternative solutions based on customer needs, direct conversation toward a commitment/order/sale, show confidence even after a hard refusal/rejection, and strive to close a transaction every time. Screening 30 Minutes Required Sales Focus Designed to predict the 60 likelihood that candidates will suggest or show alternative solutions based on customer needs, direct conversation toward a commitment/order/sale, show confidence even after a hard refusal/rejection, and strive to close a transaction every time. Customer Focus Designed to predict the 32 likelihood that candidates will show persistent enthusiasm in customer interaction, apologize sincerely for inconveniences to customers, be patient with customers, tolerate rude customers calmly, and search for information or products for customers. Working with This component is designed 30 Information to predict success in (15 minute customer service call-center timer) jobs by assessing a candidate's ability to retrieve information and use it in order to solve problems. -
TABLE SIX Sales Solutions Solution Component Definition Items Screening 10-14 Minutes Required Educational and Measures potential for 15 Work-Related success in customer service Experience jobs. Scores on Education and Work-Related Experience are derived from candidates responses to questions regarding development influences, self- esteem, work history and work-related values and attitudes. Sales Potential Designed to predict the 23 likelihood that candidates will suggest or show alternative solutions based on customer needs, direct conversation toward a commitment/order/sale, show confidence even after a hard refusal/rejection, and strive to close a transaction every time. Optional Customer Service Designed to predict the 20 Orientation likelihood that candidates will show persistent enthusiasm in customer interaction, apologize sincerely for inconveniences to customers, be patient with customers, tolerate rude customers calmly, and search for information or products for customers. Screening 10-25-40 Minutes Required Sales Focus Designed to predict the 60 likelihood that candidates will suggest or show alternative solutions based on customer needs, direct conversation toward a commitment/order/sale, show confidence even after a hard refusal/rejection, and strive to close a transaction every time. Optional Problem Solving Measures the tendency to 10 efficiently and effectively use numerical and analytical reasoning. This competency is characterized by the ability to solve complex problems, and make reasoned decisions. Optional Communication Measures the tendency to 10 efficiently and effectively use verbal reasoning. This competency is characterized by the ability to verbally explain complex information to others. -
TABLE SEVEN Supervisory Solutions Solution Component Definition Items Screening 10-20 Minutes Required Supervisory Measures potential for 10 Potential supervisory success across industry type and functional area. Scores on Supervisory Potential are derived from candidates' responses to questions regarding academic and social background, and aspirations concerning work. Judgment Measures potential for 10 making good judgments about how to effectively respond to work situations. Scores on Judgment are derived from candidates' responses to questions regarding situations one would likely encounter as a manager/supervisor. Optional Leadership/Coaching Measures potential for 19 Teamwork/ success as a supervisor. This Interpersonal Skills is done by having applicants' make judgments about the most effective teamwork and leadership behaviors in specific work situations. Scores are determined by comparing their response profiles to the profiles of supervisors who are known to be successful. Screening 22-37-52 Mins Required Business Measures the candidate's 28 Leadership thinking styles. High scorers are likely to have or learn good planning and organizing skills, be innovative, consider issues from multiple perspectives, and create strategies to build their business. Required Leadership Measures the candidate's 23 Motivation desire for achievement, drive, initiative, energy level, willingness to take charge, and persistence. High scorers are likely to be highly motivated to succeed and to set challenging goals for themselves and others. Self-Leadership Measures the candidate's 32 ability to control emotions, act with integrity, take responsibility for actions, and tolerate stress. High scorers are also likely to have a positive attitude, be optimistic about the future, and demonstrate high levels of professionalism. Interpersonal Measures the candidate's 30 Leadership interpersonal characteristics. High scorers are likely to persuade and influence others, gain commitment, and build effective interpersonal relationships. They also have potential to develop skills in the area of employee relations, coaching, motivating, and leading a team. Optional Decision Measures the tendency to 10 Making/Problem efficiently and effectively Solving use numerical and analytical reasoning. This competency is characterized by the ability to solve complex problems, and make reasoned decisions. Optional Communication Measures the tendency to 10 efficiently and effectively use verbal reasoning. This competency is characterized by the ability to verbally explain complex information to others. -
TABLE EIGHT Professional Solutions Solution Component Definition Items Screening 7-Minutes Required Dependability This competency is 40 characterized to behave in expected and agree upon ways; following through on assignments and commitments; keep promises; and accept the consequences of one's own actions. Interpersonal Skills This competency is indexed by a tendency to be pleasant, cooperative, and helpful when working with others, as well as flexible in conflict resolution situations. Self-Control This competency is characterized by the ability to: stay calm and collected when confronted with adversity, frustration, or other difficult situations; and avoid defensive reactions or hurt feelings as a result of others' comments. Energy This competency is characterized by a preference to stay busy, active, and avoid inactive events or situations. Selection 35-50 Minutes Required Business Leadership Measures the candidate's 32 thinking styles. High scorers are likely to have or learn good planning and organizing skills, be innovative, consider issues from multiple perspectives, and create strategies to build their business. Leadership Measures the candidate's 35 Motivation desire for achievement, drive, initiative, energy level, willingness to take charge, and persistence. High scorers are likely to be highly motivated to succeed and to set challenging goals for themselves and others. Self-Leadership Measures the candidate's 34 ability to control emotions, act with integrity, take responsibility for actions, and tolerate stress. High scorers are also likely to have a positive attitude, be optimistic about the future, and demonstrate high levels of professionalism. Interpersonal Measures the candidate's 41 Leadership interpersonal characteristics. High scorers are likely to persuade and influence others, gain commitment, and build effective interpersonal relationships. They also have potential to develop skills in the areas of employee relations, coaching, motivating, and leading a team. Decision Measures the tendency to 10 Making/Problem efficiently and effectively Solving use numerical and analytical reasoning. This competency is characterized by the ability to solve complex problems, and make reasoned decisions. Optional Communication Measures the tendency to 10 efficiently and effectively use verbal reasoning. This competency is characterized by the ability to verbally explain complex information to others. -
TABLE NINE Managerial Solutions Solution Component Definition Items Screening 10-20 Minutes Required Management Measures potential for 10 Potential managerial success across industry type and functional area. Scores on Management Potential are derived from candidates' responses to questions regarding academic and social background, and aspirations concerning work. Judgment Measures potential for 10 making good judgments about how to effectively respond to work situations. Scores on Judgment are derived from candidates' responses to questions regarding situations one would likely encounter as a manager/supervisor. Optional Self-Confidence This component references: 10 belief in one's own abilities and skills and a tendency to feel competent in several areas. Decision Making Measures potential for success as a manager. This is done by having applicants' make judgments about the most effective decisions in specific work situations. Their potential is determined by comparing their response profiles to the profiles of successful managers. Selection 20-35-50 Mins Required Business Leadership Measures the candidate's 32 thinking styles. High scorers are likely to have or learn good planning and organizing skills, be innovative, consider issues from multiple perspectives, and create strategies to build their business. Leadership Measures the candidate's 35 Motivation desire for achievement, drive, initiative, energy level, willingness to take charge, and persistence. High scorers are likely to be highly motivated to succeed and to set challenging goals for themselves and others. Self-Leadership Measures the candidate's 34 ability to control emotions, act with integrity, take responsibility for actions, and tolerate stress. High scorers are also likely to have a positive attitude, be optimistic about the future, and demonstrate high levels of professionalism. Interpersonal Measures the candidate's 41 Leadership interpersonal characteristics. High scorers are likely to persuade and influence others, gain commitment, and build effective interpersonal relationships. They also have potential to develop skills in the areas of employee relations, coaching, motivating, and leading a team. Optional Decision Measures the tendency to 10 Making/Problem efficiently and effectively Solving use numerical and analytical reasoning. This competency is characterized by the ability to solve complex problems, and make reasoned decisions. Optional Communication Measures the tendency to 10 efficiently and effectively use verbal reasoning. This competency is characterized by the ability to verbally explain complex information to others. -
TABLE TEN Technical-Professional Solutions Solution Component Definition Items Screening 8 Minutes Required Dependability This competency is 40 characterized by: a willingness to behave in expected and agree upon ways; following through on assignments and commitments; keeping promises; and accepting the consequences of one's own actions. Interpersonal Skills This competency is indexed by a tendency to be pleasant, cooperative, and helpful when working with others, as well as flexible in conflict resolution situations. Self-Control This competency is characterized by the ability to: stay calm and collected when confronted with adversity, frustration, or other difficult situations; and avoid defensive reactions or hurt feelings as a result of others' comments. Energy This competency is characterized by a preference to stay busy, active, and avoid inactive events or situations. Selection 35-50 Minutes Required Business Leadership Measures the candidate's 32 thinking styles. High scorers are likely to have or learn good planning and organizing skills, be innovative, consider issues from multiple perspectives, and create strategies to build their business. Leadership Measures the candidate's 35 Motivation desire for achievement, drive, initiative, energy level, willingness to take charge, and persistence. High scorers are likely to be highly motivated to succeed and to set challenging goals for themselves and others. Self-Leadership Measures the candidate's 34 ability to control emotions, act with integrity, take responsibility for actions, and tolerate stress. High scorers are also likely to have a positive attitude, be optimistic about the future, and demonstrate high levels of professionalism. Interpersonal Measures the candidate's 41 Leadership interpersonal characteristics. High scorers are likely to persuade and influence others, gain commitment, and build effective interpersonal relationships. They also have potential to develop skills in the areas of employee relations, coaching, motivating, and leading a team. Decision Measures the tendency to 10 Making/Problem efficiently and effectively Solving use numerical and analytical reasoning. This competency is characterized by the ability to solve complex problems, and make reasoned decisions. Optional Communication Measures the tendency to 10 efficiently and effectively use verbal reasoning and effectively use verbal reasoning. This competency is characterized by the ability to verbally explain complex information to others. -
TABLE ELEVEN Executive Solutions Solution Component Definition Items Screening 20 Minutes Required Executive Potential Measures the potential for 53 success in high-level organizational positions across industry type and functional area. Scores on Executive Potential are derived from candidates' responses to questions regarding work background, accomplishments, and career aspirations. Selection 35-50 Minutes Required Business Leadership Measures the candidate's 32 thinking styles. High scorers are likely to have or learn good planning and organizing skills, be innovative, consider issues from multiple perspectives, and create strategies to build their business. Leadership Measures the candidate's 35 Motivation desire for achievement, drive, initiative, energy level, willingness to take charge, and persistence. High scorers are likely to be highly motivated to succeed and to set challenging goals for themselves and others. Self-Leadership Measures the candidate's 34 ability to control emotions, act with integrity, take responsibility for actions, and tolerate stress. High scorers are also likely to have a positive attitude, be optimistic about the future, and demonstrate high levels of professionalism. Interpersonal Measures the candidate's 41 Leadership interpersonal characteristics. High scorers are likely to persuade and influence others, gain commitment, and build effective interpersonal relationships. They also have potential to develop skills in the areas of employee relations, coaching, motivating, and leading a team. Decision Measures the tendency to 10 Making/Problem efficiently and effectively Solving use numerical and analytical reasoning. This competency is characterized by the ability to solve complex problems, and make reasoned decisions. Optional Communication Measures the tendency to 10 efficiently and effectively use verbal reasoning. This competency is characterized by the ability to verbally explain complex information to others. -
TABLE TWELVE Campus Recruiting Solutions Solution Component Definition Items Screening 12 Minutes Required Supervisory Measures potential for 26 Potential supervisory success across industry type and functional area. Scores on Supervisory Potential are derived from candidates' responses to questions regarding academic and social background, and aspirations concerning work. Judgment Measures potential for making good judgments about how to effectively respond to work situations. Scores on Judgment are derived from candidates' responses to questions regarding situations one would likely encounter as a manager/supervisor. Management Measures potential for Potential managerial success across industry type and functional area. Scores on Management Potential are derived from candidates' responses to questions regarding academic and social background, and aspirations concerning work. Selection 20-35-50 Min Required Business Leadership Measures the candidate's 32 thinking styles. High scorers are likely to have or learn good planning and organizing skills, be innovative, consider issues from multiple perspectives, and create strategies to build their business. Leadership Measures the candidate's 35 Motivation desire for achievement, drive, initiative, energy level, willingness to take charge, and persistence. High scorers are likely to be highly motivated to succeed and to set challenging goals for themselves and others. Self-Leadership Measures the candidate's 34 ability to control emotions, act with integrity, take responsibility for actions, and tolerate stress. High scorers are also likely to have a positive attitude, be optimistic about the future, and demonstrate high levels of professionalism. Interpersonal Measures the candidate's 41 Leadership interpersonal characteristics. High scorers are likely to persuade and influence others, gain commitment, and build effective interpersonal relationships. They also have potential to develop skills in the area of employee relations, coaching, motivating, and leading a team. Optional Decision Measures the tendency to 10 Making/Problem efficiently and effectively Solving use numerical and analytical reasoning. This competency is characterized by the ability to solve complex problems, and make reasoned decisions. Optional Communication Measures the tendency to 10 efficiently and effectively use verbal reasoning. This competency is characterized by the ability to verbally explain complex information to others. -
TABLE THIRTEEN Communication Solution Solution Component Definition Items Selection 37 Minutes Required Listening Measure of the tendency to 73 Orientation listen to and understand others' perspectives, to care for others, to accept and respect the individual differences of people, and to be open both to multiple ideas and to using alternative mode of thinking. English Language Measures usage of verb Skills tense and sentence construction. Scores on English Language Skills are derived from candidates responses to grammar questions. Verbal Measures verbal reasoning Reasoning/Critical skills and critical thinking/ Thinking reasoning skills. Scores on Verbal Reasoning Ability are derived from candidates' responses to analogies and questions about information provided in brief reading passages. -
TABLE FOURTEEN Series Six/Seven Success Solution Solution Component Definition Items Screening 36 Minutes Required Problem Solving Measures the ability to 20 analyze and evaluate information. Scores on Problem Solving are derived from candidates' responses to mathematical and analytical reasoning items, requiring candidates to response to facts and figures presented in various formats. Verbal Measures verbal reasoning Reasoning/Critical skills and critical Thinking thinking/reasoning skills. Scores on Verbal Reasoning Ability are derived from candidates' responses to analogies and involves making inferences from information provided in the form of brief passages -
TABLE FIFTEEN Information Technology Aptitude Solution Solution Component Definition Items Screening 18 Minutes Required Critical Thinking Measure reasoning and 58 critical thinking skills. Scores on Critical Thinking are derived from candidates' responses to information provided in the form of brief passages. Problem Solving Measure the ability to analyze and evaluate information. Scores on Problem Solving are derived from candidates' responses to mathematical and analytical reasoning items, requiring candidates to respond to facts and figures presented in various scenarios. Communication Measures the ability to efficiently use verbal information. Scores on Communication are derived from candidates' ability to identify synonyms. Spatial Ability Measure the ability to visually manipulate objects. Scores on Spatial Ability are derived from candidates' ability to correctly identify the number of blocks in progressively difficult figures. - Although the disclosure has focused on recruiting applications, the generated data may be used in other human capital applications.
FIG. 13 illustrates a human capital management life-cycle. Measurement anddata 1301 is initially used in the context ofrecruiting 1302. Forrecruiting 1302, screening, selection, and interview solutions measure applicants' competencies and predict on-the-job performance and thus contribution to business outcomes. - For
compensation 1303, data about potential can be weighed against performance data to ensure that high potential employees who are on difficult assignments where they are structurally constrained from succeeding are not underpaid by pure focus on performance. For example, structural constraints may include business environments, poor staff, unreliable equipment, etc. - For
retention 1304, businesses with jobs that high turnover use the system to ensure that applicants have qualities that contribute to longer tenure in roles. - For
performance role 1305, the system van be used to enhance the validity of employee performance evaluation. - For training and
development 1306, a company may test current employees in order to design executive training programs addressing each individual's strengths and weaknesses. Or, for employees that took a test and were hired despite weaknesses, the data can be used to structure appropriate training. - For
succession 1307, data on employees may be collected in the process of organization mergers to assist planning for retrenchment or change. Also, by measuring competencies and mapping them between roles, it is possible to assess the potential that an individual may have for a role other than the job they are currently holding, such as for a promotion or a transfer to another area. - The foregoing description is to be considered as illustrative only. The skilled artisan will recognize many variations and permutations within the spirit of the disclosure.
Claims (39)
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US12/338,703 US20090187446A1 (en) | 2000-06-12 | 2008-12-18 | Computer-implemented system for human resources management |
Applications Claiming Priority (3)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US21104400P | 2000-06-12 | 2000-06-12 | |
US09/878,245 US7606778B2 (en) | 2000-06-12 | 2001-06-12 | Electronic predication system for assessing a suitability of job applicants for an employer |
US12/338,703 US20090187446A1 (en) | 2000-06-12 | 2008-12-18 | Computer-implemented system for human resources management |
Related Parent Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US09/878,245 Continuation US7606778B2 (en) | 2000-06-12 | 2001-06-12 | Electronic predication system for assessing a suitability of job applicants for an employer |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
US20090187446A1 true US20090187446A1 (en) | 2009-07-23 |
Family
ID=22785382
Family Applications (6)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US09/878,245 Active 2024-05-12 US7606778B2 (en) | 2000-06-12 | 2001-06-12 | Electronic predication system for assessing a suitability of job applicants for an employer |
US10/410,307 Abandoned US20030191680A1 (en) | 2000-06-12 | 2003-04-10 | Computer-implemented system for human resources management |
US10/410,184 Abandoned US20030195786A1 (en) | 2000-06-12 | 2003-04-10 | Computer-implemented system for human resources management |
US10/410,270 Abandoned US20030200136A1 (en) | 2000-06-12 | 2003-04-10 | Computer-implemented system for human resources management |
US12/338,703 Abandoned US20090187446A1 (en) | 2000-06-12 | 2008-12-18 | Computer-implemented system for human resources management |
US12/539,166 Expired - Fee Related US8086558B2 (en) | 2000-06-12 | 2009-08-11 | Computer-implemented system for human resources management |
Family Applications Before (4)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US09/878,245 Active 2024-05-12 US7606778B2 (en) | 2000-06-12 | 2001-06-12 | Electronic predication system for assessing a suitability of job applicants for an employer |
US10/410,307 Abandoned US20030191680A1 (en) | 2000-06-12 | 2003-04-10 | Computer-implemented system for human resources management |
US10/410,184 Abandoned US20030195786A1 (en) | 2000-06-12 | 2003-04-10 | Computer-implemented system for human resources management |
US10/410,270 Abandoned US20030200136A1 (en) | 2000-06-12 | 2003-04-10 | Computer-implemented system for human resources management |
Family Applications After (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US12/539,166 Expired - Fee Related US8086558B2 (en) | 2000-06-12 | 2009-08-11 | Computer-implemented system for human resources management |
Country Status (8)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (6) | US7606778B2 (en) |
EP (1) | EP1299820A4 (en) |
JP (1) | JP2004503877A (en) |
AU (1) | AU6831801A (en) |
CA (1) | CA2412526A1 (en) |
NZ (1) | NZ522509A (en) |
WO (1) | WO2001097083A1 (en) |
ZA (1) | ZA200208987B (en) |
Cited By (18)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20050246299A1 (en) * | 2000-08-03 | 2005-11-03 | Unicru, Inc. | Electronic employee selection systems and methods |
US20090006178A1 (en) * | 2007-06-29 | 2009-01-01 | Peopleanswers, Inc. | Behavioral Profiles in Sourcing and Recruiting as Part of a Hiring Process |
US20100324960A1 (en) * | 2009-06-22 | 2010-12-23 | Accenture Global Services Gmbh | Predicative Recruitment Reporting and Management |
US20110131082A1 (en) * | 2008-07-21 | 2011-06-02 | Michael Manser | System and method for tracking employee performance |
US8086558B2 (en) | 2000-06-12 | 2011-12-27 | Previsor, Inc. | Computer-implemented system for human resources management |
US20130166358A1 (en) * | 2011-12-21 | 2013-06-27 | Saba Software, Inc. | Determining a likelihood that employment of an employee will end |
US8775125B1 (en) | 2009-09-10 | 2014-07-08 | Jpmorgan Chase Bank, N.A. | System and method for improved processing performance |
US8843388B1 (en) * | 2009-06-04 | 2014-09-23 | West Corporation | Method and system for processing an employment application |
US8996359B2 (en) | 2011-05-18 | 2015-03-31 | Dw Associates, Llc | Taxonomy and application of language analysis and processing |
US9020807B2 (en) | 2012-01-18 | 2015-04-28 | Dw Associates, Llc | Format for displaying text analytics results |
US9269353B1 (en) | 2011-12-07 | 2016-02-23 | Manu Rehani | Methods and systems for measuring semantics in communications |
US20160284223A1 (en) * | 2015-03-27 | 2016-09-29 | Hartford Fire Insurance Company | System for optimizing employee leadership training program enrollment selection |
US9667513B1 (en) | 2012-01-24 | 2017-05-30 | Dw Associates, Llc | Real-time autonomous organization |
US10346784B1 (en) | 2012-07-27 | 2019-07-09 | Google Llc | Near-term delivery system performance simulation |
US20190311329A1 (en) * | 2017-01-01 | 2019-10-10 | Darryl Clines | Decision Making Add-on System |
US10984386B2 (en) * | 2016-07-14 | 2021-04-20 | Universal Entertainment Corporation | Interview system |
US11023530B2 (en) * | 2019-02-13 | 2021-06-01 | International Business Machines Corporation | Predicting user preferences and requirements for cloud migration |
US11138007B1 (en) * | 2020-12-16 | 2021-10-05 | Mocha Technologies Inc. | Pseudo coding platform |
Families Citing this family (228)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
IES20000466A2 (en) | 1999-08-03 | 2001-03-21 | Performix Res Ltd | A performance management system |
US7873533B2 (en) * | 2000-04-21 | 2011-01-18 | Accolo, Inc. | Comprehensive employment recruiting communications system with translation facility |
US20120078804A1 (en) * | 2000-08-03 | 2012-03-29 | Kronos Talent Management Inc. | Electronic employee selection systems and methods |
US7496518B1 (en) * | 2000-08-17 | 2009-02-24 | Strategic Outsourcing Corporation | System and method for automated screening and qualification of employment candidates |
US8156051B1 (en) * | 2001-01-09 | 2012-04-10 | Northwest Software, Inc. | Employment recruiting system |
WO2002065233A2 (en) * | 2001-02-09 | 2002-08-22 | Mellon Hr Solutions Llc | Individual valuation in a group |
US20020198765A1 (en) * | 2001-02-22 | 2002-12-26 | Magrino Susan A. | Human capital management performance capability matching system and methods |
US7437309B2 (en) * | 2001-02-22 | 2008-10-14 | Corporate Fables, Inc. | Talent management system and methods for reviewing and qualifying a workforce utilizing categorized and free-form text data |
US20020143573A1 (en) * | 2001-04-03 | 2002-10-03 | Bryce John M. | Integrated automated recruiting management system |
FI20010838A (en) * | 2001-04-24 | 2002-10-25 | Marko Kesti | Method and system for process control and optimization |
NL1018087C2 (en) * | 2001-05-16 | 2002-09-26 | Yourfuture N V | Information system and method for bringing together supply and demand on a labor market. |
US7778938B2 (en) * | 2001-06-05 | 2010-08-17 | Accuhire.Com Corporation | System and method for screening of job applicants |
GB2392757A (en) * | 2001-06-15 | 2004-03-10 | Centranum Ltd | Performance management system |
JP3949909B2 (en) * | 2001-06-27 | 2007-07-25 | 富士通株式会社 | Purchaser evaluation system, program, and media |
US20030009479A1 (en) * | 2001-07-03 | 2003-01-09 | Calvetta Phair | Employment placement method |
US20030037032A1 (en) * | 2001-08-17 | 2003-02-20 | Michael Neece | Systems and methods for intelligent hiring practices |
US20030050811A1 (en) * | 2001-09-10 | 2003-03-13 | Freeman Robert B. | System and method for hiring an applicant |
GB2382290B (en) * | 2001-10-24 | 2006-04-05 | David Skuse | Computer based interviewing system |
US7321858B2 (en) | 2001-11-30 | 2008-01-22 | United Negro College Fund, Inc. | Selection of individuals from a pool of candidates in a competition system |
US20030177052A1 (en) * | 2002-03-12 | 2003-09-18 | Smith William W. | Human resources management system and method |
US20030229510A1 (en) * | 2002-05-21 | 2003-12-11 | Jason Kerr | Discriminating network recruitment system |
US8548929B1 (en) * | 2002-06-10 | 2013-10-01 | Citicorp Credit Services, Inc. | Methods and systems of employment candidate data management |
US20030236699A1 (en) * | 2002-06-24 | 2003-12-25 | Anne Krebs | System and method of intellectual/immaterial/intangible resource control |
US20040018474A1 (en) * | 2002-07-25 | 2004-01-29 | D'ippolito Elaine | Adult/child system and method for learning life experiences and good habits and activities and knowledge |
US20040044538A1 (en) * | 2002-08-27 | 2004-03-04 | Mauzy Katherine G. | System and method for processing applications for employment |
US20040107112A1 (en) * | 2002-12-02 | 2004-06-03 | Cotter Milton S. | Employment center |
US20050240431A1 (en) * | 2002-12-02 | 2005-10-27 | Cotter Milton S | Employment center |
US7610288B2 (en) * | 2003-01-07 | 2009-10-27 | At&T Intellectual Property I, L.P. | Performance management system and method |
US20040138903A1 (en) * | 2003-01-13 | 2004-07-15 | Zuniga Sara Suzanne | Employment management tool and method |
US20040143489A1 (en) * | 2003-01-20 | 2004-07-22 | Rush-Presbyterian - St. Luke's Medical Center | System and method for facilitating a performance review process |
US20040148220A1 (en) * | 2003-01-27 | 2004-07-29 | Freeman Robert B. | System and method for candidate management |
TW200423696A (en) * | 2003-02-04 | 2004-11-01 | Ginganet Corp | Remote interview system |
US20040220852A1 (en) * | 2003-04-30 | 2004-11-04 | Posey Ivan Miles | System and method for rewarding performance |
US20050021623A1 (en) * | 2003-05-07 | 2005-01-27 | Ahmed Syed Mike | Computer-implemented system for matching parties and subsequent automatic notification to matched parties |
US20050131756A1 (en) * | 2003-06-19 | 2005-06-16 | Benson Sheila D. | Automated and variably weighted applicant and employee screening system |
DE10339990B8 (en) * | 2003-08-29 | 2013-01-31 | Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. | A method of fabricating a metal line having increased resistance to electromigration along an interface of a dielectric barrier layer by implanting material into the metal line |
CA2441516A1 (en) | 2003-09-18 | 2005-03-18 | Corporate Responsibility System Technologies Ltd. | System and method for evaluating regulatory compliance for a company |
EP1671266A4 (en) * | 2003-09-18 | 2007-01-10 | Corporate Responsibility Syste | System and method for evaluating regulatory compliance for a company |
US7555441B2 (en) * | 2003-10-10 | 2009-06-30 | Kronos Talent Management Inc. | Conceptualization of job candidate information |
US20050240457A1 (en) * | 2004-01-30 | 2005-10-27 | Connally Samuel B | Systems, methods and computer program products for facilitating evaluation of job applicants by search committees |
US20050181339A1 (en) * | 2004-02-18 | 2005-08-18 | Hewson Roger D. | Developing the twelve cognitive functions of individuals |
US20050228709A1 (en) * | 2004-04-08 | 2005-10-13 | Hillel Segal | Internet-based job placement system for managing proposals for screened and pre-qualified participants |
US20060106636A1 (en) * | 2004-04-08 | 2006-05-18 | Hillel Segal | Internet-based job placement system for creating proposals for screened and pre-qualified participants |
US20050246241A1 (en) * | 2004-04-30 | 2005-11-03 | Rightnow Technologies, Inc. | Method and system for monitoring successful use of application software |
US8346593B2 (en) | 2004-06-30 | 2013-01-01 | Experian Marketing Solutions, Inc. | System, method, and software for prediction of attitudinal and message responsiveness |
US8732004B1 (en) | 2004-09-22 | 2014-05-20 | Experian Information Solutions, Inc. | Automated analysis of data to generate prospect notifications based on trigger events |
US20060085736A1 (en) * | 2004-10-16 | 2006-04-20 | Au Anthony S | A Scientific Formula and System which derives standardized data and faster search processes in a Personnel Recruiting System, that generates more accurate results |
US20060195335A1 (en) * | 2005-01-21 | 2006-08-31 | Christian Lana S | System and method for career development |
US20080183486A1 (en) * | 2005-01-21 | 2008-07-31 | Baumgarten Leora B | Computer method of collecting, managing and using job applicant data for specific employment opportunities |
US20060212448A1 (en) * | 2005-03-18 | 2006-09-21 | Bogle Phillip L | Method and apparatus for ranking candidates |
US20060212305A1 (en) * | 2005-03-18 | 2006-09-21 | Jobster, Inc. | Method and apparatus for ranking candidates using connection information provided by candidates |
US20110022530A1 (en) * | 2005-03-18 | 2011-01-27 | Phillip Lee Bogle | Method and apparatus for ranking candidates |
US7472097B1 (en) * | 2005-03-23 | 2008-12-30 | Kronos Talent Management Inc. | Employee selection via multiple neural networks |
US8566144B2 (en) * | 2005-03-31 | 2013-10-22 | Amazon Technologies, Inc. | Closed loop voting feedback |
US20060224404A1 (en) * | 2005-04-05 | 2006-10-05 | Carl Keusseyan | Web-based system and method for screening job candidates |
US20060228689A1 (en) * | 2005-04-12 | 2006-10-12 | Rajaram Kishore K | Interactive tutorial system and method |
US20060235884A1 (en) * | 2005-04-18 | 2006-10-19 | Performance Assessment Network, Inc. | System and method for evaluating talent and performance |
US8517742B1 (en) * | 2005-05-17 | 2013-08-27 | American Express Travel Related Services Company, Inc. | Labor resource testing system and method |
US8433713B2 (en) * | 2005-05-23 | 2013-04-30 | Monster Worldwide, Inc. | Intelligent job matching system and method |
US8375067B2 (en) | 2005-05-23 | 2013-02-12 | Monster Worldwide, Inc. | Intelligent job matching system and method including negative filtration |
US8527510B2 (en) | 2005-05-23 | 2013-09-03 | Monster Worldwide, Inc. | Intelligent job matching system and method |
CA2544324A1 (en) * | 2005-06-10 | 2006-12-10 | Unicru, Inc. | Employee selection via adaptive assessment |
US20070016436A1 (en) * | 2005-07-12 | 2007-01-18 | Kakar Man M | Computer system for resource management |
US20070015125A1 (en) * | 2005-07-14 | 2007-01-18 | Presidio Sciences, L.P. | Automated updating of job assessments |
US20070015124A1 (en) * | 2005-07-14 | 2007-01-18 | Presidio Sciences, L.P. | Automated updating of job analyses |
US8719076B2 (en) * | 2005-08-11 | 2014-05-06 | Accenture Global Services Limited | Finance diagnostic tool |
US7593860B2 (en) * | 2005-09-12 | 2009-09-22 | International Business Machines Corporation | Career analysis method and system |
US20070078831A1 (en) * | 2005-09-30 | 2007-04-05 | Accenture Global Services Gmbh | Enterprise performance management tool |
US20070100684A1 (en) * | 2005-10-31 | 2007-05-03 | Friedrich Gartner | Method of evaluating sales opportunities |
US20070116241A1 (en) * | 2005-11-10 | 2007-05-24 | Flocken Phil A | Support case management system |
US8073724B2 (en) * | 2005-12-02 | 2011-12-06 | Saudi Arabian Oil Company | Systems program product, and methods for organization realignment |
US20070160963A1 (en) * | 2006-01-10 | 2007-07-12 | International Business Machines Corporation | Candidate evaluation tool |
US20070224580A1 (en) * | 2006-02-23 | 2007-09-27 | Mcfaul William J | Method for assessing a mental function activity profile |
US7558737B2 (en) * | 2006-02-28 | 2009-07-07 | Sap Ag | Entity validation framework |
JP4894301B2 (en) * | 2006-03-03 | 2012-03-14 | 富士通株式会社 | Skill value calculation program and skill value calculation device |
WO2007135690A2 (en) * | 2006-05-19 | 2007-11-29 | S Raj Mohan | Web enabled method for managing life cycle of human capital related dynamic requirements of organization |
US7882040B2 (en) * | 2006-05-31 | 2011-02-01 | Gulf Talent Fz-Llc | Method for computer server operation |
US20080059290A1 (en) * | 2006-06-12 | 2008-03-06 | Mcfaul William J | Method and system for selecting a candidate for a position |
US20080027771A1 (en) * | 2006-07-27 | 2008-01-31 | Uti Limited Partnership | Selection process |
US8036979B1 (en) | 2006-10-05 | 2011-10-11 | Experian Information Solutions, Inc. | System and method for generating a finance attribute from tradeline data |
US7983945B2 (en) * | 2006-10-18 | 2011-07-19 | Vienna Human Capital Advisors, Llc | Method and system for analysis of financial investment in human capital resources |
US20080109299A1 (en) * | 2006-11-06 | 2008-05-08 | Genpact Global Holdings Sicar Sarl | Multi-tiered career progression system and method |
WO2008060279A1 (en) * | 2006-11-15 | 2008-05-22 | Lehman Brothers Inc. | Method and system for conducting pre-employment process |
US8965868B2 (en) * | 2006-11-15 | 2015-02-24 | Barclays Capital Inc. | Method and system for conducting pre-employment process |
US7991635B2 (en) * | 2007-01-17 | 2011-08-02 | Larry Hartmann | Management of job candidate interview process using online facility |
WO2008103282A1 (en) | 2007-02-16 | 2008-08-28 | Nusbaum Michael J | Self-contained automatic fire extinguisher |
WO2008102255A1 (en) * | 2007-02-23 | 2008-08-28 | Gioacchino La Vecchia | System and method for routing tasks to a user in a workforce |
WO2008134376A1 (en) * | 2007-04-24 | 2008-11-06 | Dynamic Connections, Llc | Peer ranking |
SG148044A1 (en) * | 2007-05-08 | 2008-12-31 | Siang Chien Mark Tey | Integrated strategic organizational resource and performance alignment management system and method |
WO2008147918A2 (en) | 2007-05-25 | 2008-12-04 | Experian Information Solutions, Inc. | System and method for automated detection of never-pay data sets |
US20090094101A1 (en) * | 2007-10-09 | 2009-04-09 | Performance Esource, Inc. D/B/A Performance Esource | QUICK TO COACH: A Performance Management Tool |
US8386481B1 (en) | 2007-10-12 | 2013-02-26 | Salesdrive LLC | System and method for candidate assessment |
US7996521B2 (en) | 2007-11-19 | 2011-08-09 | Experian Marketing Solutions, Inc. | Service for mapping IP addresses to user segments |
US20090164311A1 (en) * | 2007-12-19 | 2009-06-25 | Microsoft Corporation | Human resource management system |
US20090187473A1 (en) * | 2008-01-18 | 2009-07-23 | Blaze Jerry M | System and method for recruiting online |
US10540712B2 (en) | 2008-02-08 | 2020-01-21 | The Pnc Financial Services Group, Inc. | User interface with controller for selectively redistributing funds between accounts |
US20090254401A1 (en) * | 2008-04-04 | 2009-10-08 | Iscopia Software Inc. | System and method for creating a custom assessment project |
US20110055098A1 (en) * | 2008-04-30 | 2011-03-03 | Stewart Jeffrey A | Automated employment information exchange and method for employment compatibility verification |
US20090276296A1 (en) * | 2008-05-01 | 2009-11-05 | Anova Innovations, Llc | Business profit resource optimization system and method |
US20090276297A1 (en) * | 2008-05-05 | 2009-11-05 | Sap Ag | Method and system for reviewing and managing employees |
US8401938B1 (en) | 2008-05-12 | 2013-03-19 | The Pnc Financial Services Group, Inc. | Transferring funds between parties' financial accounts |
US8219433B2 (en) * | 2008-05-12 | 2012-07-10 | Pandya Rajiv D | Methods for analyzing job functions and job candidates and for determining their co-suitability |
US8751385B1 (en) | 2008-05-15 | 2014-06-10 | The Pnc Financial Services Group, Inc. | Financial email |
US20090299827A1 (en) * | 2008-05-30 | 2009-12-03 | Oracle International Corporation | Verifying Operator Competence |
US10388179B2 (en) | 2008-06-18 | 2019-08-20 | Accenture Global Solutions Limited | Analytics platform |
US20090319344A1 (en) * | 2008-06-18 | 2009-12-24 | Tepper Samuel R | Assessment of sales force personnel for improvement of sales performance |
US20100010880A1 (en) * | 2008-07-09 | 2010-01-14 | Learning Sciences International | Performance observation, tracking and improvement system and method |
US8204809B1 (en) * | 2008-08-27 | 2012-06-19 | Accenture Global Services Limited | Finance function high performance capability assessment |
US8266068B1 (en) * | 2008-10-06 | 2012-09-11 | Intuit Inc. | Candidate interview assistant |
US9147177B2 (en) * | 2008-11-07 | 2015-09-29 | Oracle International Corporation | Method and system for implementing a scoring mechanism |
US10891036B1 (en) | 2009-01-30 | 2021-01-12 | The Pnc Financial Services Group, Inc. | User interfaces and system including same |
US8965798B1 (en) | 2009-01-30 | 2015-02-24 | The Pnc Financial Services Group, Inc. | Requesting reimbursement for transactions |
US20100262550A1 (en) * | 2009-04-08 | 2010-10-14 | Avaya Inc. | Inter-corporate collaboration overlay solution for professional social networks |
WO2010132492A2 (en) | 2009-05-11 | 2010-11-18 | Experian Marketing Solutions, Inc. | Systems and methods for providing anonymized user profile data |
US20110166903A1 (en) * | 2010-01-05 | 2011-07-07 | Sunmeet Singh Jolly | Web based Offshorability Probability Calculator - Job analysis Tool for Individuals made available on Internet |
US9047611B2 (en) | 2010-01-25 | 2015-06-02 | Yahoo! Inc. | System and method for finding relative score and enhancing one or more scores associated with data objects |
US20110196801A1 (en) * | 2010-02-05 | 2011-08-11 | Nicholas Jeremy Ellis | Method and apparatus for hiring using mobile phones |
US8791949B1 (en) | 2010-04-06 | 2014-07-29 | The Pnc Financial Services Group, Inc. | Investment management marketing tool |
US8780115B1 (en) | 2010-04-06 | 2014-07-15 | The Pnc Financial Services Group, Inc. | Investment management marketing tool |
US8473423B2 (en) * | 2010-06-09 | 2013-06-25 | Avaya Inc. | Contact center expert identification |
US8417614B1 (en) | 2010-07-02 | 2013-04-09 | The Pnc Financial Services Group, Inc. | Investor personality tool |
US11475523B1 (en) | 2010-07-02 | 2022-10-18 | The Pnc Financial Services Group, Inc. | Investor retirement lifestyle planning tool |
US11475524B1 (en) | 2010-07-02 | 2022-10-18 | The Pnc Financial Services Group, Inc. | Investor retirement lifestyle planning tool |
US8423444B1 (en) | 2010-07-02 | 2013-04-16 | The Pnc Financial Services Group, Inc. | Investor personality tool |
US9152727B1 (en) | 2010-08-23 | 2015-10-06 | Experian Marketing Solutions, Inc. | Systems and methods for processing consumer information for targeted marketing applications |
US20120077174A1 (en) * | 2010-09-29 | 2012-03-29 | Depaul William | Competency assessment tool |
US20120171648A1 (en) * | 2010-12-29 | 2012-07-05 | Paula Price | System for increasing the probability of success and identifying required preparation for service in lifestyle occupations |
US8352406B2 (en) | 2011-02-01 | 2013-01-08 | Bullhorn, Inc. | Methods and systems for predicting job seeking behavior |
US10699313B2 (en) | 2011-02-22 | 2020-06-30 | Theatro Labs, Inc. | Observation platform for performing structured communications |
US10375133B2 (en) | 2011-02-22 | 2019-08-06 | Theatro Labs, Inc. | Content distribution and data aggregation for scalability of observation platforms |
US9602625B2 (en) | 2011-02-22 | 2017-03-21 | Theatrolabs, Inc. | Mediating a communication in an observation platform |
US11599843B2 (en) | 2011-02-22 | 2023-03-07 | Theatro Labs, Inc. | Configuring , deploying, and operating an application for structured communications for emergency response and tracking |
US9407543B2 (en) | 2011-02-22 | 2016-08-02 | Theatrolabs, Inc. | Observation platform for using structured communications with cloud computing |
US8948730B2 (en) | 2011-02-22 | 2015-02-03 | Theatro Labs, Inc. | Observation platform for using structured communications |
US10204524B2 (en) | 2011-02-22 | 2019-02-12 | Theatro Labs, Inc. | Observation platform for training, monitoring and mining structured communications |
US10134001B2 (en) * | 2011-02-22 | 2018-11-20 | Theatro Labs, Inc. | Observation platform using structured communications for gathering and reporting employee performance information |
US11605043B2 (en) | 2011-02-22 | 2023-03-14 | Theatro Labs, Inc. | Configuring, deploying, and operating an application for buy-online-pickup-in-store (BOPIS) processes, actions and analytics |
US20120221251A1 (en) * | 2011-02-22 | 2012-08-30 | Neuron Valley Networks | Systems and methods for selecting, ordering, scheduling, administering, storing, interpreting and transmitting a plurality of psychological, neurobehavioral and neurobiological tests |
US11636420B2 (en) * | 2011-02-22 | 2023-04-25 | Theatro Labs, Inc. | Configuring, deploying, and operating applications for structured communications within observation platforms |
US8374940B1 (en) | 2011-02-28 | 2013-02-12 | The Pnc Financial Services Group, Inc. | Wealth allocation analysis tools |
US9852470B1 (en) | 2011-02-28 | 2017-12-26 | The Pnc Financial Services Group, Inc. | Time period analysis tools for wealth management transactions |
US8321316B1 (en) | 2011-02-28 | 2012-11-27 | The Pnc Financial Services Group, Inc. | Income analysis tools for wealth management |
US9665908B1 (en) | 2011-02-28 | 2017-05-30 | The Pnc Financial Services Group, Inc. | Net worth analysis tools |
US9098831B1 (en) | 2011-04-19 | 2015-08-04 | The Pnc Financial Services Group, Inc. | Search and display of human resources information |
US8417554B2 (en) * | 2011-05-06 | 2013-04-09 | International Business Machines Corporation | Tool for manager assistance |
US20130054482A1 (en) * | 2011-08-31 | 2013-02-28 | Sap Ag | Interview assistant system and method |
US8745083B1 (en) | 2011-10-31 | 2014-06-03 | James G. Ruiz | System and method for matching candidates with personnel needs |
US20130178956A1 (en) * | 2012-01-10 | 2013-07-11 | Oracle International Corporation | Identifying top strengths for a person |
US10169812B1 (en) | 2012-01-20 | 2019-01-01 | The Pnc Financial Services Group, Inc. | Providing financial account information to users |
GB2499827A (en) | 2012-03-01 | 2013-09-04 | Do It Solutions Ltd | Assessing a person's ability to achieve a pre-determined outcome |
US20140149180A1 (en) * | 2012-04-19 | 2014-05-29 | Oracle International Corporation | Sale prediction engine rules |
US20130290210A1 (en) * | 2012-04-27 | 2013-10-31 | Furstperson, Inc. | System and method for automating pre-employment assessment |
US20130297373A1 (en) * | 2012-05-02 | 2013-11-07 | Xerox Corporation | Detecting personnel event likelihood in a social network |
US20130339102A1 (en) * | 2012-06-14 | 2013-12-19 | The One Page Company Inc. | Proposal evaluation system |
CN104541297B (en) | 2012-07-02 | 2018-06-12 | 甲骨文国际公司 | Method, system and the medium of the scalability of sales forecast device SPE are provided |
WO2014052798A2 (en) * | 2012-09-28 | 2014-04-03 | Hireiq Solutions, Inc. | System and method of evaluating candidates for a hiring decision |
US8973115B2 (en) | 2012-10-04 | 2015-03-03 | American Nurses Credentialing Center | System and method for assembling and analyzing a candidate application for a credential |
US9963954B2 (en) | 2012-11-16 | 2018-05-08 | Saudi Arabian Oil Company | Caliper steerable tool for lateral sensing and accessing |
JP5926464B2 (en) * | 2012-12-14 | 2016-05-25 | ワルトシラ フィンランド オサケユキチュア | Method for filling fuel tank with liquefied gas and liquefied gas fuel system |
US20140172732A1 (en) * | 2012-12-14 | 2014-06-19 | Roy Baladi | Psychographic based methods and systems for job seeking |
US20140180756A1 (en) * | 2012-12-21 | 2014-06-26 | Roth Staffing Companies, L.P. | Method and System for Modeling Workforce Turnover Propensity |
US20140278656A1 (en) * | 2013-03-15 | 2014-09-18 | Roth Staffing Companies, L.P. | Service Level Model, Algorithm, Systems and Methods |
US20140324525A1 (en) * | 2013-04-30 | 2014-10-30 | Linkedin Corporation | Analyzing career site viewer information |
WO2014205504A1 (en) * | 2013-06-28 | 2014-12-31 | Big Picture (Ip) Pty Ltd | Systems, methods, apparatus and graphical user interfaces for automated candidate rejection and/or feedback |
US9734486B2 (en) | 2013-08-08 | 2017-08-15 | Sap Se | Integrated temporary labor provisioning and monitoring |
US20150046356A1 (en) * | 2013-08-08 | 2015-02-12 | Oracle International Corporation | Identification of skills gaps based on previous successful hires |
US9256688B2 (en) * | 2013-08-09 | 2016-02-09 | Google Inc. | Ranking content items using predicted performance |
WO2015048789A2 (en) | 2013-09-30 | 2015-04-02 | Maximus, Inc. | Process tracking and defect detection |
CA2937618A1 (en) | 2013-10-16 | 2015-04-23 | Ken LAHTI | Assessment system |
US10102536B1 (en) | 2013-11-15 | 2018-10-16 | Experian Information Solutions, Inc. | Micro-geographic aggregation system |
US8818910B1 (en) * | 2013-11-26 | 2014-08-26 | Comrise, Inc. | Systems and methods for prioritizing job candidates using a decision-tree forest algorithm |
US20150161746A1 (en) * | 2013-12-11 | 2015-06-11 | Gerhard H. WENGLORZ | Method and apparatus for custom-engineered sourcing |
US20190095845A1 (en) * | 2014-03-08 | 2019-03-28 | Casey L. Welch | Online Computerized Platform/Clearinghose for Providing Rating, Ranking, Recognition, and Comparing of Students |
US9378486B2 (en) * | 2014-03-17 | 2016-06-28 | Hirevue, Inc. | Automatic interview question recommendation and analysis |
US20160335600A1 (en) * | 2014-03-18 | 2016-11-17 | Linkedln Corporation | Automated talent nurturing |
US9413707B2 (en) | 2014-04-11 | 2016-08-09 | ACR Development, Inc. | Automated user task management |
US8942727B1 (en) | 2014-04-11 | 2015-01-27 | ACR Development, Inc. | User Location Tracking |
US20150302345A1 (en) * | 2014-04-16 | 2015-10-22 | International Business Machines Corporation | Technology for project scheduling based on team member stress |
US9576030B1 (en) | 2014-05-07 | 2017-02-21 | Consumerinfo.Com, Inc. | Keeping up with the joneses |
US9652745B2 (en) | 2014-06-20 | 2017-05-16 | Hirevue, Inc. | Model-driven evaluator bias detection |
US11257117B1 (en) | 2014-06-25 | 2022-02-22 | Experian Information Solutions, Inc. | Mobile device sighting location analytics and profiling system |
WO2016033108A1 (en) * | 2014-08-25 | 2016-03-03 | Unitive, Inc. | Human resource system providing reduced bias |
US20160098653A1 (en) * | 2014-10-03 | 2016-04-07 | Soren Hojby | Risk Analysis to Improve Operational Workforce Planning |
US10528916B1 (en) * | 2014-11-06 | 2020-01-07 | Hirevue Inc. | Competency-based question selection for digital evaluation platforms |
US10242019B1 (en) | 2014-12-19 | 2019-03-26 | Experian Information Solutions, Inc. | User behavior segmentation using latent topic detection |
US20160292615A1 (en) * | 2015-04-03 | 2016-10-06 | Surepeople Llc | Data driven relationship advisor apparatus and method |
US20180130002A1 (en) * | 2015-04-15 | 2018-05-10 | Paul Dekoekkoek | Requirements determination |
US10621535B1 (en) * | 2015-04-24 | 2020-04-14 | Mark Lawrence | Method and apparatus to onboard resources |
US9626654B2 (en) * | 2015-06-30 | 2017-04-18 | Linkedin Corporation | Learning a ranking model using interactions of a user with a jobs list |
US9280745B1 (en) * | 2015-07-08 | 2016-03-08 | Applied Underwriters, Inc. | Artificial intelligence expert system for screening |
US10592830B2 (en) * | 2015-07-14 | 2020-03-17 | Conduent Business Services, Llc | Method and system for managing one or more human resource functions in an organization |
JP7001593B2 (en) * | 2015-08-11 | 2022-01-19 | コグノア, インコーポレイテッド | Methods and devices for determining developmental progress using artificial intelligence and user input |
US9767309B1 (en) | 2015-11-23 | 2017-09-19 | Experian Information Solutions, Inc. | Access control system for implementing access restrictions of regulated database records while identifying and providing indicators of regulated database records matching validation criteria |
US11074536B2 (en) * | 2015-12-29 | 2021-07-27 | Workfusion, Inc. | Worker similarity clusters for worker assessment |
US10825356B2 (en) | 2016-01-05 | 2020-11-03 | SmartSpark, Inc. | System and method for determining and providing behavioural modification motivational cues |
US20170308841A1 (en) * | 2016-04-21 | 2017-10-26 | Ceb Inc. | Predictive Analytics System Using Current And Historical Role Information |
US20170308811A1 (en) * | 2016-04-21 | 2017-10-26 | Vishal Kumar | Talent Artificial Intelligence Virtual Agent Bot |
US10909469B2 (en) | 2016-05-02 | 2021-02-02 | Surepeople Llc | Data driven intelligent learning and development apparatus and method |
WO2017190165A1 (en) * | 2016-05-02 | 2017-11-09 | Red Bull Gmbh | Method for testing employability and personal strengths |
US11132644B2 (en) | 2016-06-29 | 2021-09-28 | At&T Intellectual Property I, L.P. | Method and apparatus for managing employment-related decisions |
US20180039927A1 (en) * | 2016-08-05 | 2018-02-08 | General Electric Company | Automatic summarization of employee performance |
US10678894B2 (en) | 2016-08-24 | 2020-06-09 | Experian Information Solutions, Inc. | Disambiguation and authentication of device users |
WO2018148365A1 (en) | 2017-02-09 | 2018-08-16 | Cognoa, Inc. | Platform and system for digital personalized medicine |
US11030697B2 (en) | 2017-02-10 | 2021-06-08 | Maximus, Inc. | Secure document exchange portal system with efficient user access |
JP2018173719A (en) * | 2017-03-31 | 2018-11-08 | Hrソリューションズ株式会社 | Test system, test device, and test method |
US11657402B2 (en) | 2017-05-16 | 2023-05-23 | Visa International Service Association | Dynamic claims submission system |
US20190087782A1 (en) * | 2017-09-19 | 2019-03-21 | International Business Machines Corporation | Cognitive, dynamic assessment advisor or builder |
CN109639747B (en) * | 2017-10-09 | 2020-06-26 | 阿里巴巴集团控股有限公司 | Data request processing method, data request processing device, query message processing method, query message processing device and equipment |
US11551570B2 (en) | 2018-02-15 | 2023-01-10 | Smarthink Srl | Systems and methods for assessing and improving student competencies |
US10957431B2 (en) | 2018-04-20 | 2021-03-23 | International Business Machines Corporation | Human resource selection based on readability of unstructured text within an individual case safety report (ICSR) and confidence of the ICSR |
JP6596539B1 (en) * | 2018-05-16 | 2019-10-23 | 国立大学法人佐賀大学 | Application / evaluation support system and server |
US20210264372A1 (en) * | 2018-07-04 | 2021-08-26 | Imi Material Handling Logistics Inc. | Automated human resources management and engagement system and method |
US11288607B2 (en) * | 2018-07-18 | 2022-03-29 | Merinio Inc. | Automated resource management system and method |
WO2020051121A1 (en) | 2018-09-04 | 2020-03-12 | Liders Llc D/B/A Celectiv | Integrated system for and method of matching, acquiring, and developing human talent |
US11880797B2 (en) * | 2019-01-23 | 2024-01-23 | Macorva Inc. | Workforce sentiment monitoring and detection systems and methods |
US11232380B2 (en) | 2019-03-20 | 2022-01-25 | Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc | Mapping assessment results to levels of experience |
US11238394B2 (en) | 2019-03-20 | 2022-02-01 | Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc | Assessment-based qualified candidate delivery |
US11205144B2 (en) | 2019-03-20 | 2021-12-21 | Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc | Assessment-based opportunity exploration |
CA3134521A1 (en) | 2019-03-22 | 2020-10-01 | Cognoa, Inc. | Personalized digital therapy methods and devices |
TR201904875A1 (en) * | 2019-04-01 | 2020-10-21 | Zirve Ikibinbir Uluslararasi Insaat Proje Taahhuet Yazilim Bilisim Danismanlik Ticaret Ltd Sirketi | CONSTRUCTION TECHNICAL TRAINING AND MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS AND PERSONNEL SELECTION AND EVALUATION |
WO2021003302A1 (en) * | 2019-07-01 | 2021-01-07 | Strategic Management Decisions, Llc | Matching candidates to organization position |
US11238410B1 (en) * | 2019-12-17 | 2022-02-01 | iCIMS, Inc. | Methods and systems for merging outputs of candidate and job-matching artificial intelligence engines executing machine learning-based models |
US11682041B1 (en) | 2020-01-13 | 2023-06-20 | Experian Marketing Solutions, Llc | Systems and methods of a tracking analytics platform |
US11962708B2 (en) * | 2020-05-26 | 2024-04-16 | Indeed, Inc. | Resume document parsing using computer vision and optical character recognition with reblocking feedback |
US11514403B2 (en) * | 2020-10-29 | 2022-11-29 | Accenture Global Solutions Limited | Utilizing machine learning models for making predictions |
CA3142047A1 (en) * | 2020-12-22 | 2022-06-22 | Ziigra Inc. | Candidate matching system |
US11900327B2 (en) * | 2021-06-30 | 2024-02-13 | Capital One Services, Llc | Evaluation adjustment factoring for bias |
US20230306352A1 (en) * | 2022-01-27 | 2023-09-28 | Next Jump Inc. | Interactive electronic evaluation systems and methods |
Citations (31)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US5371807A (en) * | 1992-03-20 | 1994-12-06 | Digital Equipment Corporation | Method and apparatus for text classification |
US5608899A (en) * | 1993-06-04 | 1997-03-04 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method and apparatus for searching a database by interactively modifying a database query |
US5794178A (en) * | 1993-09-20 | 1998-08-11 | Hnc Software, Inc. | Visualization of information using graphical representations of context vector based relationships and attributes |
US5887120A (en) * | 1995-05-31 | 1999-03-23 | Oracle Corporation | Method and apparatus for determining theme for discourse |
US6061675A (en) * | 1995-05-31 | 2000-05-09 | Oracle Corporation | Methods and apparatus for classifying terminology utilizing a knowledge catalog |
US6094650A (en) * | 1997-12-15 | 2000-07-25 | Manning & Napier Information Services | Database analysis using a probabilistic ontology |
US6115718A (en) * | 1998-04-01 | 2000-09-05 | Xerox Corporation | Method and apparatus for predicting document access in a collection of linked documents featuring link proprabilities and spreading activation |
US6144964A (en) * | 1998-01-22 | 2000-11-07 | Microsoft Corporation | Methods and apparatus for tuning a match between entities having attributes |
US6263334B1 (en) * | 1998-11-11 | 2001-07-17 | Microsoft Corporation | Density-based indexing method for efficient execution of high dimensional nearest-neighbor queries on large databases |
US20010031457A1 (en) * | 2000-01-11 | 2001-10-18 | Performance Assessment Network, Inc. | Test administration system using the internet |
US20010034630A1 (en) * | 2000-04-21 | 2001-10-25 | Robert Half International, Inc. | Interactive employment system and method |
US6311641B1 (en) * | 1999-09-13 | 2001-11-06 | Mary Lou Johnson | Bird perch, feeder, and bath |
US20020046199A1 (en) * | 2000-08-03 | 2002-04-18 | Unicru, Inc. | Electronic employee selection systems and methods |
US20020072946A1 (en) * | 1999-12-13 | 2002-06-13 | Richardson Mary L. | Method and system for employment placement |
US20020173971A1 (en) * | 2001-03-28 | 2002-11-21 | Stirpe Paul Alan | System, method and application of ontology driven inferencing-based personalization systems |
US20020198766A1 (en) * | 2001-02-22 | 2002-12-26 | Magrino Susan A. | Human capital management inventory and position matching system and methods |
US6513027B1 (en) * | 1999-03-16 | 2003-01-28 | Oracle Corporation | Automated category discovery for a terminological knowledge base |
US6564197B2 (en) * | 1999-05-03 | 2003-05-13 | E.Piphany, Inc. | Method and apparatus for scalable probabilistic clustering using decision trees |
US20030101170A1 (en) * | 2001-05-25 | 2003-05-29 | Joseph Edelstein | Data query and location through a central ontology model |
US20030120630A1 (en) * | 2001-12-20 | 2003-06-26 | Daniel Tunkelang | Method and system for similarity search and clustering |
US6598047B1 (en) * | 1999-07-26 | 2003-07-22 | David W. Russell | Method and system for searching text |
US6662194B1 (en) * | 1999-07-31 | 2003-12-09 | Raymond Anthony Joao | Apparatus and method for providing recruitment information |
US6711585B1 (en) * | 1999-06-15 | 2004-03-23 | Kanisa Inc. | System and method for implementing a knowledge management system |
US6721754B1 (en) * | 1999-04-28 | 2004-04-13 | Arena Pharmaceuticals, Inc. | System and method for database similarity join |
US6778995B1 (en) * | 2001-08-31 | 2004-08-17 | Attenex Corporation | System and method for efficiently generating cluster groupings in a multi-dimensional concept space |
US6778979B2 (en) * | 2001-08-13 | 2004-08-17 | Xerox Corporation | System for automatically generating queries |
US6847966B1 (en) * | 2002-04-24 | 2005-01-25 | Engenium Corporation | Method and system for optimally searching a document database using a representative semantic space |
US6917952B1 (en) * | 2000-05-26 | 2005-07-12 | Burning Glass Technologies, Llc | Application-specific method and apparatus for assessing similarity between two data objects |
US20060074836A1 (en) * | 2004-09-03 | 2006-04-06 | Biowisdom Limited | System and method for graphically displaying ontology data |
US7161705B2 (en) * | 2003-04-04 | 2007-01-09 | Xerox Corporation | Parallel printing system having modes for auto-recovery, auto-discovery of resources, and parallel processing of unprotected postscript jobs |
US7383241B2 (en) * | 2003-07-25 | 2008-06-03 | Enkata Technologies, Inc. | System and method for estimating performance of a classifier |
Family Cites Families (89)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US5117353A (en) | 1989-05-05 | 1992-05-26 | Staff-Plus, Inc. | System for use in a temporary help business |
US5197004A (en) | 1989-05-08 | 1993-03-23 | Resumix, Inc. | Method and apparatus for automatic categorization of applicants from resumes |
US5164897A (en) | 1989-06-21 | 1992-11-17 | Techpower, Inc. | Automated method for selecting personnel matched to job criteria |
US5059127A (en) | 1989-10-26 | 1991-10-22 | Educational Testing Service | Computerized mastery testing system, a computer administered variable length sequential testing system for making pass/fail decisions |
US5170362A (en) | 1991-01-15 | 1992-12-08 | Atlantic Richfield Company | Redundant system for interactively evaluating the capabilities of multiple test subjects to perform a task utilizing a computerized test system |
US5408588A (en) | 1991-06-06 | 1995-04-18 | Ulug; Mehmet E. | Artificial neural network method and architecture |
US5467428A (en) | 1991-06-06 | 1995-11-14 | Ulug; Mehmet E. | Artificial neural network method and architecture adaptive signal filtering |
US5326270A (en) * | 1991-08-29 | 1994-07-05 | Introspect Technologies, Inc. | System and method for assessing an individual's task-processing style |
US5799282A (en) | 1992-05-19 | 1998-08-25 | Medical Training And Services, International | Methods for establishing certifiable informed consent for a medical procedure |
US5565316A (en) | 1992-10-09 | 1996-10-15 | Educational Testing Service | System and method for computer based testing |
US5551880A (en) | 1993-01-22 | 1996-09-03 | Bonnstetter; Bill J. | Employee success prediction system |
US5490097A (en) | 1993-03-22 | 1996-02-06 | Fujitsu Limited | System and method for modeling, analyzing and executing work process plans |
US5325862A (en) | 1993-03-26 | 1994-07-05 | The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Navy | Method and/or system for personal identification and impairment assessment from brain activity patterns |
US5377258A (en) * | 1993-08-30 | 1994-12-27 | National Medical Research Council | Method and apparatus for an automated and interactive behavioral guidance system |
US5461699A (en) | 1993-10-25 | 1995-10-24 | International Business Machines Corporation | Forecasting using a neural network and a statistical forecast |
US5416694A (en) * | 1994-02-28 | 1995-05-16 | Hughes Training, Inc. | Computer-based data integration and management process for workforce planning and occupational readjustment |
US5592375A (en) | 1994-03-11 | 1997-01-07 | Eagleview, Inc. | Computer-assisted system for interactively brokering goods or services between buyers and sellers |
US5618182A (en) | 1994-09-30 | 1997-04-08 | Thomas; C. Douglass | Method and apparatus for improving performance on multiple-choice exams |
US5980096A (en) | 1995-01-17 | 1999-11-09 | Intertech Ventures, Ltd. | Computer-based system, methods and graphical interface for information storage, modeling and stimulation of complex systems |
JPH08287162A (en) | 1995-02-14 | 1996-11-01 | Toshiba Corp | Work flow system |
US5671409A (en) | 1995-02-14 | 1997-09-23 | Fatseas; Ted | Computer-aided interactive career search system |
US5774883A (en) * | 1995-05-25 | 1998-06-30 | Andersen; Lloyd R. | Method for selecting a seller's most profitable financing program |
US5832497A (en) | 1995-08-10 | 1998-11-03 | Tmp Worldwide Inc. | Electronic automated information exchange and management system |
US5788504A (en) | 1995-10-16 | 1998-08-04 | Brookhaven Science Associates Llc | Computerized training management system |
US5727128A (en) | 1996-05-08 | 1998-03-10 | Fisher-Rosemount Systems, Inc. | System and method for automatically determining a set of variables for use in creating a process model |
US6272467B1 (en) | 1996-09-09 | 2001-08-07 | Spark Network Services, Inc. | System for data collection and matching compatible profiles |
US5978767A (en) | 1996-09-10 | 1999-11-02 | Electronic Data Systems Corporation | Method and system for processing career development information |
US6189029B1 (en) | 1996-09-20 | 2001-02-13 | Silicon Graphics, Inc. | Web survey tool builder and result compiler |
US5845285A (en) | 1997-01-07 | 1998-12-01 | Klein; Laurence C. | Computer system and method of data analysis |
US6056556A (en) | 1997-03-05 | 2000-05-02 | Educational Testing Service | Computer-based simulation examination of architectural practice |
US6259890B1 (en) | 1997-03-27 | 2001-07-10 | Educational Testing Service | System and method for computer based test creation |
US5978768A (en) | 1997-05-08 | 1999-11-02 | Mcgovern; Robert J. | Computerized job search system and method for posting and searching job openings via a computer network |
US6341267B1 (en) | 1997-07-02 | 2002-01-22 | Enhancement Of Human Potential, Inc. | Methods, systems and apparatuses for matching individuals with behavioral requirements and for managing providers of services to evaluate or increase individuals' behavioral capabilities |
US6266659B1 (en) | 1997-08-07 | 2001-07-24 | Uday P. Nadkarni | Skills database management system and method |
US5885097A (en) * | 1997-08-28 | 1999-03-23 | Hon Hai Precision Ind. Co., Ltd. | Electrical connector with a board locking device |
US6049776A (en) | 1997-09-06 | 2000-04-11 | Unisys Corporation | Human resource management system for staffing projects |
CA2305344A1 (en) | 1997-09-29 | 1999-04-08 | Network Recruiting, Inc. | On-line recruiting system with improved candidate and position profiling |
US6070143A (en) | 1997-12-05 | 2000-05-30 | Lucent Technologies Inc. | System and method for analyzing work requirements and linking human resource products to jobs |
US6115646A (en) | 1997-12-18 | 2000-09-05 | Nortel Networks Limited | Dynamic and generic process automation system |
US6144838A (en) | 1997-12-19 | 2000-11-07 | Educational Testing Services | Tree-based approach to proficiency scaling and diagnostic assessment |
US6311164B1 (en) * | 1997-12-30 | 2001-10-30 | Job Files Corporation | Remote job application method and apparatus |
JP3916749B2 (en) | 1998-03-11 | 2007-05-23 | 富士通株式会社 | Work mediation apparatus and recording medium |
US20010011280A1 (en) | 1998-04-14 | 2001-08-02 | Edward S. Gilbert | Computer-based training system |
US6405159B2 (en) | 1998-06-03 | 2002-06-11 | Sbc Technology Resources, Inc. | Method for categorizing, describing and modeling types of system users |
US6591246B1 (en) | 1998-06-16 | 2003-07-08 | The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Navy | Automated skills program |
US6126448A (en) | 1998-07-06 | 2000-10-03 | Ho; Chi Fai | Computer-aided learning methods and apparatus for a job |
JP2000113064A (en) | 1998-10-09 | 2000-04-21 | Fuji Xerox Co Ltd | Optimum acting person selection support system |
US6046556A (en) * | 1998-10-19 | 2000-04-04 | Hughes Electronics Corporation | Motor current sensing circuit |
US20010042000A1 (en) | 1998-11-09 | 2001-11-15 | William Defoor | Method for matching job candidates with employers |
US6269479B1 (en) | 1998-11-30 | 2001-07-31 | Unisys Corporation | Method and computer program product for evaluating the performance of an object-oriented application program |
US6275812B1 (en) | 1998-12-08 | 2001-08-14 | Lucent Technologies, Inc. | Intelligent system for dynamic resource management |
US6873964B1 (en) | 1998-12-11 | 2005-03-29 | Lockheed Martin Corporation | Method and system for recruiting personnel |
US6334133B1 (en) | 1998-12-21 | 2001-12-25 | Frontline Data, Inc. | System and method for performing substitute fulfillment |
US6505183B1 (en) * | 1999-02-04 | 2003-01-07 | Authoria, Inc. | Human resource knowledge modeling and delivery system |
US6513042B1 (en) | 1999-02-11 | 2003-01-28 | Test.Com | Internet test-making method |
US6611822B1 (en) | 1999-05-05 | 2003-08-26 | Ac Properties B.V. | System method and article of manufacture for creating collaborative application sharing |
US6567784B2 (en) | 1999-06-03 | 2003-05-20 | Ework Exchange, Inc. | Method and apparatus for matching projects and workers |
US6735570B1 (en) | 1999-08-02 | 2004-05-11 | Unisys Corporation | System and method for evaluating a selectable group of people against a selectable set of skills |
US6524109B1 (en) | 1999-08-02 | 2003-02-25 | Unisys Corporation | System and method for performing skill set assessment using a hierarchical minimum skill set definition |
US6289340B1 (en) | 1999-08-03 | 2001-09-11 | Ixmatch, Inc. | Consultant matching system and method for selecting candidates from a candidate pool by adjusting skill values |
US6385620B1 (en) | 1999-08-16 | 2002-05-07 | Psisearch,Llc | System and method for the management of candidate recruiting information |
US7200563B1 (en) | 1999-08-20 | 2007-04-03 | Acl International Inc. | Ontology-driven information system |
US6493723B1 (en) | 1999-09-22 | 2002-12-10 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method and system for integrating spatial analysis and data mining analysis to ascertain warranty issues associated with transportation products |
US6769066B1 (en) | 1999-10-25 | 2004-07-27 | Visa International Service Association | Method and apparatus for training a neural network model for use in computer network intrusion detection |
CA2394558A1 (en) | 1999-12-08 | 2001-06-14 | Skill/Vision Co., Ltd. | Recorded medium on which program for displaying skill achievement level, display device, and displaying method |
US6865581B1 (en) | 2000-01-27 | 2005-03-08 | Icomp Health Management, Inc. | Job analysis system |
US6338628B1 (en) | 2000-02-15 | 2002-01-15 | Clear Direction, Inc. | Personal training and development delivery system |
US6944596B1 (en) | 2000-02-23 | 2005-09-13 | Accenture Llp | Employee analysis based on results of an education business simulation |
AU2001249472A1 (en) | 2000-03-27 | 2001-10-08 | Bryce Arrowood | Computer-implemented web database system for staffing of personnel |
US6514079B1 (en) | 2000-03-27 | 2003-02-04 | Rume Interactive | Interactive training method for demonstrating and teaching occupational skills |
WO2001075629A1 (en) | 2000-03-31 | 2001-10-11 | Neomedia Technologies, Inc. | System for accessing internet via wireless device using linkage url bar-code |
US7043443B1 (en) | 2000-03-31 | 2006-05-09 | Firestone Lisa M | Method and system for matching potential employees and potential employers over a network |
US7191138B1 (en) | 2000-04-15 | 2007-03-13 | Mindloft Corporation | System for cataloging, inventorying selecting, measuring, valuing and matching intellectual capital and skills with a skill requirement |
US6266658B1 (en) | 2000-04-20 | 2001-07-24 | Microsoft Corporation | Index tuner for given workload |
WO2001097083A1 (en) | 2000-06-12 | 2001-12-20 | Epredix.Com | Computer-implemented system for human resources management |
US20020019940A1 (en) | 2000-06-16 | 2002-02-14 | Matteson Craig S. | Method and apparatus for assigning test and assessment instruments to users |
US6463430B1 (en) | 2000-07-10 | 2002-10-08 | Mohomine, Inc. | Devices and methods for generating and managing a database |
US6618734B1 (en) | 2000-07-20 | 2003-09-09 | Spherion Assessment, Inc. | Pre-employment screening and assessment interview process |
US7356484B2 (en) | 2000-10-03 | 2008-04-08 | Agile Software Corporation | Self-learning method and apparatus for rating service providers and predicting future performance |
US20020128894A1 (en) | 2000-10-16 | 2002-09-12 | Rose Mary Farenden | System for recruiting candidates for employment |
US20020128892A1 (en) | 2000-10-16 | 2002-09-12 | Farenden Rose Mary | Method for recruiting candidates for employment |
US20020128893A1 (en) | 2000-10-16 | 2002-09-12 | Farenden Rose Mary | Web site for recruiting candidates for employment |
US6691122B1 (en) | 2000-10-30 | 2004-02-10 | Peopleclick.Com, Inc. | Methods, systems, and computer program products for compiling information into information categories using an expert system |
US6795799B2 (en) | 2001-03-07 | 2004-09-21 | Qualtech Systems, Inc. | Remote diagnosis server |
US20030101091A1 (en) | 2001-06-29 | 2003-05-29 | Burgess Levin | System and method for interactive on-line performance assessment and appraisal |
US20030037032A1 (en) | 2001-08-17 | 2003-02-20 | Michael Neece | Systems and methods for intelligent hiring practices |
US7555441B2 (en) | 2003-10-10 | 2009-06-30 | Kronos Talent Management Inc. | Conceptualization of job candidate information |
US20050080657A1 (en) | 2003-10-10 | 2005-04-14 | Unicru, Inc. | Matching job candidate information |
CA2544324A1 (en) | 2005-06-10 | 2006-12-10 | Unicru, Inc. | Employee selection via adaptive assessment |
-
2001
- 2001-06-12 WO PCT/US2001/018796 patent/WO2001097083A1/en not_active Application Discontinuation
- 2001-06-12 JP JP2002511214A patent/JP2004503877A/en active Pending
- 2001-06-12 NZ NZ522509A patent/NZ522509A/en not_active IP Right Cessation
- 2001-06-12 AU AU6831801A patent/AU6831801A/en not_active Withdrawn
- 2001-06-12 US US09/878,245 patent/US7606778B2/en active Active
- 2001-06-12 CA CA002412526A patent/CA2412526A1/en not_active Abandoned
- 2001-06-12 EP EP01946242A patent/EP1299820A4/en not_active Withdrawn
-
2002
- 2002-11-05 ZA ZA2002/08987A patent/ZA200208987B/en unknown
-
2003
- 2003-04-10 US US10/410,307 patent/US20030191680A1/en not_active Abandoned
- 2003-04-10 US US10/410,184 patent/US20030195786A1/en not_active Abandoned
- 2003-04-10 US US10/410,270 patent/US20030200136A1/en not_active Abandoned
-
2008
- 2008-12-18 US US12/338,703 patent/US20090187446A1/en not_active Abandoned
-
2009
- 2009-08-11 US US12/539,166 patent/US8086558B2/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
Patent Citations (31)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US5371807A (en) * | 1992-03-20 | 1994-12-06 | Digital Equipment Corporation | Method and apparatus for text classification |
US5608899A (en) * | 1993-06-04 | 1997-03-04 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method and apparatus for searching a database by interactively modifying a database query |
US5794178A (en) * | 1993-09-20 | 1998-08-11 | Hnc Software, Inc. | Visualization of information using graphical representations of context vector based relationships and attributes |
US5887120A (en) * | 1995-05-31 | 1999-03-23 | Oracle Corporation | Method and apparatus for determining theme for discourse |
US6061675A (en) * | 1995-05-31 | 2000-05-09 | Oracle Corporation | Methods and apparatus for classifying terminology utilizing a knowledge catalog |
US6094650A (en) * | 1997-12-15 | 2000-07-25 | Manning & Napier Information Services | Database analysis using a probabilistic ontology |
US6144964A (en) * | 1998-01-22 | 2000-11-07 | Microsoft Corporation | Methods and apparatus for tuning a match between entities having attributes |
US6115718A (en) * | 1998-04-01 | 2000-09-05 | Xerox Corporation | Method and apparatus for predicting document access in a collection of linked documents featuring link proprabilities and spreading activation |
US6263334B1 (en) * | 1998-11-11 | 2001-07-17 | Microsoft Corporation | Density-based indexing method for efficient execution of high dimensional nearest-neighbor queries on large databases |
US6513027B1 (en) * | 1999-03-16 | 2003-01-28 | Oracle Corporation | Automated category discovery for a terminological knowledge base |
US6721754B1 (en) * | 1999-04-28 | 2004-04-13 | Arena Pharmaceuticals, Inc. | System and method for database similarity join |
US6564197B2 (en) * | 1999-05-03 | 2003-05-13 | E.Piphany, Inc. | Method and apparatus for scalable probabilistic clustering using decision trees |
US6711585B1 (en) * | 1999-06-15 | 2004-03-23 | Kanisa Inc. | System and method for implementing a knowledge management system |
US6598047B1 (en) * | 1999-07-26 | 2003-07-22 | David W. Russell | Method and system for searching text |
US6662194B1 (en) * | 1999-07-31 | 2003-12-09 | Raymond Anthony Joao | Apparatus and method for providing recruitment information |
US6311641B1 (en) * | 1999-09-13 | 2001-11-06 | Mary Lou Johnson | Bird perch, feeder, and bath |
US20020072946A1 (en) * | 1999-12-13 | 2002-06-13 | Richardson Mary L. | Method and system for employment placement |
US20010031457A1 (en) * | 2000-01-11 | 2001-10-18 | Performance Assessment Network, Inc. | Test administration system using the internet |
US20010034630A1 (en) * | 2000-04-21 | 2001-10-25 | Robert Half International, Inc. | Interactive employment system and method |
US6917952B1 (en) * | 2000-05-26 | 2005-07-12 | Burning Glass Technologies, Llc | Application-specific method and apparatus for assessing similarity between two data objects |
US20020046199A1 (en) * | 2000-08-03 | 2002-04-18 | Unicru, Inc. | Electronic employee selection systems and methods |
US20020198766A1 (en) * | 2001-02-22 | 2002-12-26 | Magrino Susan A. | Human capital management inventory and position matching system and methods |
US20020173971A1 (en) * | 2001-03-28 | 2002-11-21 | Stirpe Paul Alan | System, method and application of ontology driven inferencing-based personalization systems |
US20030101170A1 (en) * | 2001-05-25 | 2003-05-29 | Joseph Edelstein | Data query and location through a central ontology model |
US6778979B2 (en) * | 2001-08-13 | 2004-08-17 | Xerox Corporation | System for automatically generating queries |
US6778995B1 (en) * | 2001-08-31 | 2004-08-17 | Attenex Corporation | System and method for efficiently generating cluster groupings in a multi-dimensional concept space |
US20030120630A1 (en) * | 2001-12-20 | 2003-06-26 | Daniel Tunkelang | Method and system for similarity search and clustering |
US6847966B1 (en) * | 2002-04-24 | 2005-01-25 | Engenium Corporation | Method and system for optimally searching a document database using a representative semantic space |
US7161705B2 (en) * | 2003-04-04 | 2007-01-09 | Xerox Corporation | Parallel printing system having modes for auto-recovery, auto-discovery of resources, and parallel processing of unprotected postscript jobs |
US7383241B2 (en) * | 2003-07-25 | 2008-06-03 | Enkata Technologies, Inc. | System and method for estimating performance of a classifier |
US20060074836A1 (en) * | 2004-09-03 | 2006-04-06 | Biowisdom Limited | System and method for graphically displaying ontology data |
Cited By (30)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US8086558B2 (en) | 2000-06-12 | 2011-12-27 | Previsor, Inc. | Computer-implemented system for human resources management |
US8046251B2 (en) | 2000-08-03 | 2011-10-25 | Kronos Talent Management Inc. | Electronic employee selection systems and methods |
US20050246299A1 (en) * | 2000-08-03 | 2005-11-03 | Unicru, Inc. | Electronic employee selection systems and methods |
US20100287110A1 (en) * | 2000-08-03 | 2010-11-11 | Kronos Talent Management Inc. | Electronic employee selection systems and methods |
US20100287111A1 (en) * | 2000-08-03 | 2010-11-11 | Kronos Talent Management Inc. | Electronic employee selection systems and methods |
US8265977B2 (en) | 2000-08-03 | 2012-09-11 | Kronos Talent Management Inc. | Electronic employee selection systems and methods |
US20110145161A1 (en) * | 2000-08-03 | 2011-06-16 | Kronos Talent Management Inc. | Electronic employee selection systems and methods |
US20130246295A1 (en) * | 2007-06-29 | 2013-09-19 | Peopleanswers, Inc. | Behavioral Profiles in Sourcing and Recruiting as Part of a Hiring Process |
US8484072B1 (en) | 2007-06-29 | 2013-07-09 | Peopleanswers, Inc. | Behavioral profiles in sourcing and recruiting as part of a hiring process |
US8204778B2 (en) | 2007-06-29 | 2012-06-19 | Peopleanswers, Inc. | Behavioral profiles in sourcing and recruiting as part of a hiring process |
US20090006178A1 (en) * | 2007-06-29 | 2009-01-01 | Peopleanswers, Inc. | Behavioral Profiles in Sourcing and Recruiting as Part of a Hiring Process |
US20110131082A1 (en) * | 2008-07-21 | 2011-06-02 | Michael Manser | System and method for tracking employee performance |
US8843388B1 (en) * | 2009-06-04 | 2014-09-23 | West Corporation | Method and system for processing an employment application |
US8326771B2 (en) * | 2009-06-22 | 2012-12-04 | Accenture Global Services Limited | Predicative recruitment reporting and management |
US20100324960A1 (en) * | 2009-06-22 | 2010-12-23 | Accenture Global Services Gmbh | Predicative Recruitment Reporting and Management |
US8775125B1 (en) | 2009-09-10 | 2014-07-08 | Jpmorgan Chase Bank, N.A. | System and method for improved processing performance |
US10365986B2 (en) | 2009-09-10 | 2019-07-30 | Jpmorgan Chase Bank, N.A. | System and method for improved processing performance |
US11036609B2 (en) | 2009-09-10 | 2021-06-15 | Jpmorgan Chase Bank, N.A. | System and method for improved processing performance |
US8996359B2 (en) | 2011-05-18 | 2015-03-31 | Dw Associates, Llc | Taxonomy and application of language analysis and processing |
US9269353B1 (en) | 2011-12-07 | 2016-02-23 | Manu Rehani | Methods and systems for measuring semantics in communications |
US20130166358A1 (en) * | 2011-12-21 | 2013-06-27 | Saba Software, Inc. | Determining a likelihood that employment of an employee will end |
US9020807B2 (en) | 2012-01-18 | 2015-04-28 | Dw Associates, Llc | Format for displaying text analytics results |
US9667513B1 (en) | 2012-01-24 | 2017-05-30 | Dw Associates, Llc | Real-time autonomous organization |
US10346784B1 (en) | 2012-07-27 | 2019-07-09 | Google Llc | Near-term delivery system performance simulation |
US10032385B2 (en) * | 2015-03-27 | 2018-07-24 | Hartford Fire Insurance Company | System for optimizing employee leadership training program enrollment selection |
US20160284223A1 (en) * | 2015-03-27 | 2016-09-29 | Hartford Fire Insurance Company | System for optimizing employee leadership training program enrollment selection |
US10984386B2 (en) * | 2016-07-14 | 2021-04-20 | Universal Entertainment Corporation | Interview system |
US20190311329A1 (en) * | 2017-01-01 | 2019-10-10 | Darryl Clines | Decision Making Add-on System |
US11023530B2 (en) * | 2019-02-13 | 2021-06-01 | International Business Machines Corporation | Predicting user preferences and requirements for cloud migration |
US11138007B1 (en) * | 2020-12-16 | 2021-10-05 | Mocha Technologies Inc. | Pseudo coding platform |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
ZA200208987B (en) | 2005-04-26 |
NZ522509A (en) | 2004-09-24 |
US20020055866A1 (en) | 2002-05-09 |
US20030191680A1 (en) | 2003-10-09 |
EP1299820A1 (en) | 2003-04-09 |
JP2004503877A (en) | 2004-02-05 |
US7606778B2 (en) | 2009-10-20 |
US20030195786A1 (en) | 2003-10-16 |
WO2001097083A1 (en) | 2001-12-20 |
EP1299820A4 (en) | 2006-11-08 |
AU6831801A (en) | 2001-12-24 |
CA2412526A1 (en) | 2001-12-20 |
US20100042574A1 (en) | 2010-02-18 |
US8086558B2 (en) | 2011-12-27 |
US20030200136A1 (en) | 2003-10-23 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US8086558B2 (en) | Computer-implemented system for human resources management | |
AU2001268318A2 (en) | Computer-implemented system for human resources management | |
Ryan et al. | Attracting and selecting: What psychological research tells us | |
Holm et al. | E-recruitment and selection | |
US20110055098A1 (en) | Automated employment information exchange and method for employment compatibility verification | |
US20060235884A1 (en) | System and method for evaluating talent and performance | |
US20080059290A1 (en) | Method and system for selecting a candidate for a position | |
Barksdale et al. | Rapid needs analysis | |
Leiba O’Sullivan et al. | Expatriate management “best practices” in Canadian MNCs: a multiple case study | |
Abboud | The impact of 360 degrees performance appraisals on employee retention | |
Hammond | Career centers and needs assessments: Getting the information you need to increase your success | |
Balanescu | Theoretical and practical insights on the it staff recruitment and selection | |
Sligar et al. | The state of state vocational evaluators: A national study | |
AU2007234631A1 (en) | Computer-implemented system for human resources management | |
Musella et al. | Selection and Promotion Procedures in Ontario School Boards. Research Brief. Professionalism in Schools Series. | |
Raheef | Towards Ensuring Proper Management of Recruitment, Selection and Induction Processes Within Business Organizations | |
Pollack et al. | Using 360-Degree Feedback in Performance Appraisal | |
ABEBE | ASSESSMENT OF PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL PRACTICE AT OROMIA INTERNATIONAL BANK | |
Kariuki | Recruitment & Selection_02 (SEMIs) | |
Holm et al. | 11 e-Recruitment and selection | |
Syrjä | How to Improve the Recruitment Process: Case: MML-Group | |
Sampogna | A Job Analysis of Financial Coaches & Case Managers: Enhancing Selection, Performance Management, & Identifying Training Opportunities | |
MIRzA et al. | How do I discover my HR needs? | |
Haque | Does Assessment Method Affect Employee’ s Performance and Productivity?-An Empirical Study in Bangladesh | |
Chesang | Recruitment and selection on organizational performance: a case study of Mukwano group of companies |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: EPREDIX, INC.,GEORGIA Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:DEWAR, KATRINA L.;REEL/FRAME:024179/0529 Effective date: 20010612 |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: PREVISOR MINNESOTA, INC.,GEORGIA Free format text: CHANGE OF NAME;ASSIGNOR:EPREDIX, INC.;REEL/FRAME:024226/0096 Effective date: 20060124 |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: PREVISOR INC.,GEORGIA Free format text: CHANGE OF NAME;ASSIGNOR:PREVISOR MINNESOTA, INC.;REEL/FRAME:024271/0396 Effective date: 20061228 |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: PREVISOR INC., GEORGIA Free format text: RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST IN CERTAIN INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY;ASSIGNOR:CIT CAPITAL FINANCE (UK) LIMITED, AS SECURITY TRUSTEE;REEL/FRAME:028781/0262 Effective date: 20120731 |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: SHL USA, INC., GEORGIA Free format text: MERGER;ASSIGNOR:PREVISOR INC.;REEL/FRAME:028798/0942 Effective date: 20120330 |
|
STCB | Information on status: application discontinuation |
Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION |