US20100234125A1 - High launch and low spin golf ball and golf club combination - Google Patents
High launch and low spin golf ball and golf club combination Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- US20100234125A1 US20100234125A1 US12/404,701 US40470109A US2010234125A1 US 20100234125 A1 US20100234125 A1 US 20100234125A1 US 40470109 A US40470109 A US 40470109A US 2010234125 A1 US2010234125 A1 US 2010234125A1
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- golf club
- golf
- ball
- golf ball
- degrees
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Abandoned
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A63—SPORTS; GAMES; AMUSEMENTS
- A63B—APPARATUS FOR PHYSICAL TRAINING, GYMNASTICS, SWIMMING, CLIMBING, OR FENCING; BALL GAMES; TRAINING EQUIPMENT
- A63B53/00—Golf clubs
- A63B53/04—Heads
- A63B53/0466—Heads wood-type
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A63—SPORTS; GAMES; AMUSEMENTS
- A63B—APPARATUS FOR PHYSICAL TRAINING, GYMNASTICS, SWIMMING, CLIMBING, OR FENCING; BALL GAMES; TRAINING EQUIPMENT
- A63B37/00—Solid balls; Rigid hollow balls; Marbles
- A63B37/0003—Golf balls
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A63—SPORTS; GAMES; AMUSEMENTS
- A63B—APPARATUS FOR PHYSICAL TRAINING, GYMNASTICS, SWIMMING, CLIMBING, OR FENCING; BALL GAMES; TRAINING EQUIPMENT
- A63B37/00—Solid balls; Rigid hollow balls; Marbles
- A63B37/0003—Golf balls
- A63B37/0038—Intermediate layers, e.g. inner cover, outer core, mantle
- A63B37/004—Physical properties
- A63B37/0047—Density; Specific gravity
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A63—SPORTS; GAMES; AMUSEMENTS
- A63B—APPARATUS FOR PHYSICAL TRAINING, GYMNASTICS, SWIMMING, CLIMBING, OR FENCING; BALL GAMES; TRAINING EQUIPMENT
- A63B37/00—Solid balls; Rigid hollow balls; Marbles
- A63B37/0003—Golf balls
- A63B37/005—Cores
- A63B37/006—Physical properties
- A63B37/0066—Density; Specific gravity
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A63—SPORTS; GAMES; AMUSEMENTS
- A63B—APPARATUS FOR PHYSICAL TRAINING, GYMNASTICS, SWIMMING, CLIMBING, OR FENCING; BALL GAMES; TRAINING EQUIPMENT
- A63B37/00—Solid balls; Rigid hollow balls; Marbles
- A63B37/0003—Golf balls
- A63B37/007—Characteristics of the ball as a whole
- A63B37/0072—Characteristics of the ball as a whole with a specified number of layers
- A63B37/0076—Multi-piece balls, i.e. having two or more intermediate layers
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A63—SPORTS; GAMES; AMUSEMENTS
- A63B—APPARATUS FOR PHYSICAL TRAINING, GYMNASTICS, SWIMMING, CLIMBING, OR FENCING; BALL GAMES; TRAINING EQUIPMENT
- A63B37/00—Solid balls; Rigid hollow balls; Marbles
- A63B37/0003—Golf balls
- A63B37/007—Characteristics of the ball as a whole
- A63B37/0077—Physical properties
- A63B37/0087—Deflection or compression
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A63—SPORTS; GAMES; AMUSEMENTS
- A63B—APPARATUS FOR PHYSICAL TRAINING, GYMNASTICS, SWIMMING, CLIMBING, OR FENCING; BALL GAMES; TRAINING EQUIPMENT
- A63B53/00—Golf clubs
- A63B53/04—Heads
- A63B53/0408—Heads characterised by specific dimensions, e.g. thickness
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A63—SPORTS; GAMES; AMUSEMENTS
- A63B—APPARATUS FOR PHYSICAL TRAINING, GYMNASTICS, SWIMMING, CLIMBING, OR FENCING; BALL GAMES; TRAINING EQUIPMENT
- A63B53/00—Golf clubs
- A63B53/005—Club sets
Definitions
- the present invention relates to a golf club and golf ball combination that creates high launch and low spin characteristics that maximize the travel distance of a golf ball after impact with a golf club. More specifically, the present invention relates to a golf club capable of generating a high launch angle and a low spin rate via a lower center of gravity. Additionally the present invention also relates to a golf ball having an unusually low spin rate along with certain ratios of the coefficient of lift (C L ), coefficient of drag (C D ), and the lift-to-drag ratio (C L /C D ) measured near the beginning of the flight to the same parameters measured later in flight.
- C L coefficient of lift
- C D coefficient of drag
- C L /C D lift-to-drag ratio
- the complexities of golf club design are known; further, the complexities of golf ball design are also known.
- the design specifications for a golf club and a golf ball directly impact the launch conditions generated by a golf swing.
- the design of a golf club and a golf ball can both individually contribute to improved performance characteristics such as high launch and low spin.
- these designs although effective in maximizing launch angle and minimizing spin rate individually, fail to take into consideration the additional performance gains that are possible by correctly matching a golf club and a golf ball.
- varying the performance characteristics of a golf club in parallel with the performance characteristic of a golf ball can produce a synergistic improvement in the performance characteristics of both of the components.
- the current industry has been focused primarily on creating a golf club head that controls and improves the flight characteristics of a golf ball after impact with the golf club head.
- the prominent considerations in golf club head design are loft, lie, face angle, horizontal face bulge, vertical face roll, center of gravity, rotational moment of inertia, material selection, and overall head weight.
- the center of gravity is often adjusted to be moved to various locations within the golf club head to increase launch angle and control the spin of the golf ball.
- movable weights such as weight assemblies and weight screws, for a golf club head are disclosed. More specifically, in one configuration, the club head CG is in a center-back location, resulting in a high launch angle and a relatively low initial spin rate for optimal distance.
- a golf club head includes a club head body having a striking face, a soleplate, a toe, a heel and a hosel, wherein at least a portion of the body shell is composed of a flexible material having a density of less than approximately 2.5 g/cm 3 , and a tensile strength of at least approximately 465 MPa/(g/cm 3 ).
- a hard ball design can be seen in U.S. Pat. No. 6,743,124 to Tsunoda et al. for a Golf Ball.
- a golf ball with a low spin rate, a high launch angle, and an increased flight distance is characterized by a ratio of primary natural frequency of the golf ball in a direction in which the ball deforms to a primary natural frequency of the ball in vibration mode along a direction of torsion (f c /f n ) being in the range of 2.22 to 2.45.
- the solid core can effectively be formed from a plurality of layers having a complex modulus smallest at the inner core, larger at the intermediate layer(s) and the largest at the outermost layer to achieve a value (f c /f n ) in the range of 2.22 to 2.45.
- a three-piece solid golf ball having long flight distance by accomplishing low ball rotation rate and high launch angle at the time of hitting while maintaining good shot feel is disclosed. More specifically, a three-piece solid golf ball comprising a core composed of a center and an intermediate layer formed on the center, and a cover covering the core and having many dimples on the surface thereof is disclosed.
- a Multi-Layer Core Golf Ball having an improved multi-layer construction displaying enhanced playing characteristics including high speed, high launch, and low spin is disclosed. More specifically, a golf ball that displays improved performance in areas such as distance and feel for lower swing speed players having a relatively large solid inner core, with at least one solid outer core layer surrounding the inner core, and a thin cover layer surrounding the outermost core layer is disclosed.
- the current art has been focused on addressing each of the two important components separately. More specifically, the current art utilizes shifting of weights in a golf club head as well as shifts in the center of gravity location within a golf club head without any consideration for a matching ball design. Alternatively, the current art has also attempted to address the problem by focusing on golf ball design utilizing multiple materials having different hardnesses, different core constructions, or even different complex modulus variations with little consideration for matching the golf club head.
- a golf club and ball combination may comprises a golf club and a golf ball; wherein said golf ball achieves a launch angle ( ⁇ ) and an initial spin rate ( ⁇ i ) relationship defined as 86 ⁇ + ⁇ i ⁇ 4310 (where ⁇ is in degrees and ⁇ i is in rpm) when struck by the golf club.
- a golf club and ball combination comprises a golf ball with a beginning to end coefficient of lift ratio of 0.64 to 3.20, a beginning to end coefficient of drag ratio of 0.76 to 0.99, and a beginning to end ratio of lift to drag ratio of 0.65 to 3.40; and a golf club with a center of gravity located 10 mm to 30 mm above a ground level.
- “Beginning to end” coefficient ratios, as used in the current invention may generally refer to the coefficient measured during the beginning (ascent) portion of the flight divided by the coefficient measured during the end (descent) portion of the flight.
- a method of maximizing travel distance of a golf ball comprises adjusting a center of gravity of a golf club to be located 10 mm to 30 mm above a ground level of the golf club, adjusting a beginning to end coefficient of lift ratio for the golf ball to be 0.64 to 3.20, adjusting a beginning to end coefficient of drag ratio of the golf ball to be 0.76 to 0.99, and adjusting a beginning to end ratio of lift to drag ratio of the golf ball to be 0.65 to 3.40; wherein the golf ball achieves a launch angle ( ⁇ ) and an initial spin rate ( ⁇ i ) relationship defined as 86 ⁇ + ⁇ i ⁇ 3710 when struck by the golf club.
- FIG. 1 shows a perspective view of a golf club head and a golf ball in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention
- FIG. 2 shows a perspective view of a golf club in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention
- FIG. 3 shows a graphical representation of the effect of the center of gravity (CG) location on initial backspin
- FIG. 4 shows a graphical representation of the effect of the center of gravity (CG) location on launch angle
- FIG. 5 shows the forces acting on a golf ball in flight
- FIG. 6 shows a cross-sectional view of a golf ball in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.
- FIG. 7 shows a further cross-sectional view of a golf ball in accordance with a further alternative embodiment of the present invention.
- the present invention generally relates to a golf club and golf ball combination that create a high launch and low spinning golf ball upon impact with a golf club. More specifically, the present invention relates to a golf club and golf ball combination wherein the golf ball achieves a launch angle ⁇ and an initial spin rate ⁇ i that satisfy the following relationship when struck by the golf club:
- the present invention relates to a golf club having a lower center of gravity and/or a higher loft combined with a golf ball having a beginning to end coefficient of lift ratio of 0.64 to 3.20, a beginning to end coefficient of drag ratio of 0.76 to 0.99, and a beginning to end ratio of lift to drag ratio of 0.65 to 3.40.
- the current invention is unlike the prior art approaches on creating a high launch and low spinning golf ball that only focuses on the individual components such as a golf cub or a golf ball separately. Focusing on the individual components without taking in consideration of the additional performance enhancement capabilities that can be achieved by simultaneously adjusting and pairing the performance characteristics of both the golf club and the golf ball may not maximize the performance characteristics that can be achieved when the two components are designed in parallel with one another.
- FIG. 1 shows a golf club 100 and golf ball 102 combination in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention. More specifically, FIG. 1 shows the initial spin rate ⁇ i of the golf ball 102 and the launch angle ⁇ of the golf ball 102 relative to the flat ground surface 108 as it is struck by golf club 100 .
- a golf club 100 and golf ball 102 combination may merge to provide launch angles and initial spin rates that satisfy Equation 1 when the golf ball 102 is struck by golf club 100 . More preferably, the launch angles and spin rates satisfy Equation 2:
- Equation 3 the launch angles and spin rates satisfy Equation 3:
- Equation 4 the launch angles and spin rates satisfy Equation 4.
- Equations 1 through 4 characterize the initial conditions of the golf ball 102 's flight performance and ultimately affect the total distance of travel of the golf ball 102 .
- the trajectory is not optimal and distance is lost.
- the greatest distance improvements are achieved with unusually high launch angles in combination with initial spin rates that satisfy Equation 1, 2, 3, or 4.
- Launch angles are preferably about 15 degrees or greater, more preferably about 18 degrees or greater, and most preferably about 20 degrees or greater.
- golf club 100 in order to achieve the maximum golf ball 102 travel distance, golf club 100 may generally be modeled in accordance to an “exemplary swing” in accordance with the present invention.
- the “exemplary swing”, as described in the current invention may generally have a velocity of approximately 110 miles per hour (mph), with an attack angle of approximately 2 degrees and an effective loft of approximately 13 degrees, while maintaining the static loft angle of approximately 9.5 degrees and impacting the golf ball at the geometric center of the face to achieve ⁇ i and ⁇ values that satisfy Equation 1, 2, 3, or 4 in accordance with the exemplary embodiment of the present invention.
- FIG. 2 shows a golf club 200 designed to satisfy Equation 1, 2, 3, or 4 when striking a golf ball that is in accordance with an exemplary embodiment of the present invention.
- Two very important variables such as the center of gravity 212 and loft angle 216 may generally affect the performance characteristics of a golf club 200 in conjunction with a golf ball 102 .
- Golf club 200 may contain a head 202 at a distal end of the golf club 200 , a hosel 204 connected to head 202 , a shaft 206 connected to the hosel 204 , and a grip 208 connected to the shaft 206 .
- FIG. 2 also shows a ground level 210 on which the head 202 rests, along with the center of gravity 212 of golf club head 202 located at a distance 214 from the ground level 210 .
- Head 202 in this current exemplary embodiment may generally be applicable towards a driver type head and have a preferable volume range of approximately 300 cubic centimeters to approximately 600 cubic centimeters, and more preferably in the volume range of approximately 350 cubic centimeters to approximately 550 cubic centimeters, even more preferably in the volume range of approximately 375 cubic centimeters to approximately 475 cubic centimeters, and most preferably approximately 420 centimeters to approximately 460 centimeters; all without departing from the scope of the present invention.
- Head 202 being generally applicable towards drivers, may generally have loft angles 216 ranging from approximately 8.5 degrees to approximately 15.0 degrees.
- Hosel 204 in this current exemplary embodiment may be used to connect the head 202 to shaft 206 , and may generally be made from a low density material such as aluminum located substantially above a plane located at a peak of the crown section of head 202 .
- the hosel 204 may also provide interchangeability between various head 202 and various shafts 206 without the need for extensive tooling without departing from the scope and content of the present invention.
- Shaft 206 in this current exemplary embodiment may be used to connect the head 202 and the hosel 204 to the grip 208 to complete the golf club 200 ; however, various other components in addition to shaft 206 may be used to complete golf club 200 such as a ferrule, a grip tape, a glue, or any other components that may typically be used within a golf club 200 without departing from the scope of the present invention.
- Golf club 200 and more specifically head 202 may generally rest on a ground level 210 in an address position to create a reference point from where the center of gravity 212 may be measured to yield a distance 214 .
- Distance 214 refers to a height in the y-direction as indicated by the axis of orientation 201 in FIG. 2 ; however, other identifiers may be used to identify this distance away from the ground level 220 such as x-direction, or z-direction without departing from the scope and content of the present invention.
- distance 214 may generally be in the range of approximately 5 millimeters to approximately 35 millimeters, more preferably in the range of approximately 10 millimeters to approximately 30 millimeters, most preferably in the range of approximately 15 millimeters to approximately 25 millimeters all without departing from the scope and content of the present invention.
- FIG. 3 shows a graphical representation of the effect of the location of the center of gravity 212 with respect to changes in the initial spin rate ⁇ i in accordance with an exemplary embodiment of the present invention.
- FIG. 3 shows that the initial spin rate ⁇ i on a golf ball can be dramatically reduced as the center of gravity 212 moves closer and closer to the ground level 210 .
- FIG. 4 shows a graphical representation of the effect of the location of the center of gravity 212 with respect to changes in launch angle ⁇ in accordance with an exemplary embodiment of the present invention.
- FIG. 4 shows that the launch angle ⁇ increases as the center of gravity 212 moves closer and closer to the ground level 210 .
- decreasing the distance 214 moves the location of the center of gravity 212 closer to the ground level 210 ; which will decrease the initial spin rate ⁇ i and increase the launch angle ⁇ in accordance with an exemplary embodiment of the present invention.
- the increased launch angle ⁇ combined with the decrease in initial spin rate ⁇ i may allow the golf club head 202 to impart to the golf ball launch conditions that satisfy Equation 1, 2, 3, or 4 in accordance with an exemplary embodiment of the present invention.
- adjusting the location, and more specifically, the height distance 214 of the center of gravity 212 may generally be the preferable methodology to satisfy Equation 1, 2, 3, or 4 in accordance with an exemplary embodiment of the present invention
- other variables may also be adjusted to affect ⁇ i and ⁇ .
- adjustments may also be made to the loft angle 216 to significantly increase a without departing from the scope of the present invention. More specifically, loft angle 216 may be adjusted to range from approximately 8.5 degrees to approximately 15.0 degrees for a driver type golf head to satisfy Equation 1, 2, 3, or 4 in accordance with an exemplary embodiment of the present invention.
- loft angle 216 may be further increased to achieve a higher launch angle ⁇ through adjustments in the shaft 206 .
- shaft 206 may effective increase a higher launch angle ⁇ without changing the loft angle 216 by adjusting the way shaft 206 whips and snaps at the point of impact.
- shaft 206 in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention may generally have a softer tip at the tip section of shaft 206 in order to crease a lower kick point that may effectively increase launch angle ⁇ without adjusting the loft angle 216 without departing from the scope and content of the present invention.
- shaft 206 may allow golf club 200 to be swinging up on a golf ball, which effectively adds launch angle ⁇ without adding loft angle 216 .
- shaft 206 may also contain a swing hinge, a higher kick point, a difference in stiffness variation, or any other mechanism capable of increasing launch angle ⁇ without adding loft angle 216 all without departing from the scope and content of the present invention.
- FIG. 5 shows the forces acting during flight on a golf ball 500 in accordance with an exemplary embodiment of the present invention.
- the total aerodynamic force F A acting on a golf ball 500 is typically resolved into orthogonal components of lift (F L ) and drag (F D ).
- Lift is defined as the aerodynamic force component acting perpendicular to the flight path, and it results from a difference in pressure created by a distortion in the air flow that is caused by the backspin ⁇ of the ball.
- Drag is defined as the aerodynamic force component acting parallel to the ball flight direction. As the ball travels through the air, the pressure at the front of the ball is greater than the pressure at the rear of the ball, the difference being primarily responsible for the drag force.
- FIG. 5 shows the various forces as enumerated in Equation 5 below.
- the lift force vector (F L ) 508 acts in a direction dictated by the cross product of the spin vector and the velocity vector.
- the drag force vector (F D ) 512 acts in a direction that is directly opposite the velocity vector.
- the magnitudes of the lift and drag forces of Equation 5 are calculated in Equations 6 and 7, respectively:
- A projected area of the ball (ft 2 ) (( ⁇ /4)D 2 )
- V ball speed (ft/s)
- Lift and drag coefficients are typically used to quantify the aerodynamic forces imparted to a ball in flight and are dependent on air density, air viscosity, ball speed, and spin rate. The influence of all these parameters may be captured by two dimensionless parameters: Spin Ratio (SR) and Reynolds Number (N Re ).
- Spin Ratio is the rotational surface speed of the ball divided by ball speed.
- Reynolds Number quantifies the ratio of inertial to viscous forces acting on the golf ball moving through air.
- SR and N Re are calculated in Equations 8 and 9 below:
- V ball speed (ft/s)
- This beginning to end coefficient ratio can be applicable to the coefficient of lift (C L ), coefficient of drag (C D ), and the lift-to-drag ratio (C L /C D ), yielding a beginning to end coefficient of lift ratio (C L-Beg /C L-End ), a beginning to end coefficient of drag ratio (C D-Beg /C D-End ), and beginning to end ratio of lift to drag
- a Reynolds Number (N Re ) of approximately 220,000 with a Spin Ratio (SR) of approximately 0.054 is used to represent the exemplary aerodynamic conditions during the beginning (ascent) portion of the golf ball flight. These conditions generally translate into a golf ball 500 velocity of approximately 168 mph at a spin rate of approximately 1800 rpm.
- N Re a Reynolds Number (N Re ) of approximately 80,000 with a Spin Ratio (SR) of approximately 0.120 is used to represent the exemplary aerodynamic conditions during the end (descent) portion of golf ball flight. These conditions generally translate into a golf ball 500 velocity of approximately 61 mph at a spin rate of approximately 1460 rpm.
- the beginning to end coefficient of lift ratio (C L-Beg /C L-End ) may be approximately within the range of 0.64 to 3.20, more preferably within the range of 0.72 to 2.03, most preferably within the range of 0.80 to 0.86. Additionally, the beginning to end coefficient of drag ratio (C D-Beg /C D-End ) may be approximately within the range of 0.76 to 0.99, more preferably within the range of 0.82 to 0.96, most preferably within the range of 0.87 to 0.93. Lastly, the beginning to end lift to drag ratio
- FIG. 6 shows a multi-layered golf ball 600 capable of achieving launch conditions that satisfy Equation 1, 2, 3, or 4 in accordance with the exemplary embodiment of the present invention.
- Golf ball 600 may generally have an inner core 602 , a cover layer 608 , and at least one intermediate layer 604 between the inner core 602 and the cover layer 608 .
- the inner core 602 , the intermediate layers 604 , and the cover layer 608 may all be constructed to have different properties.
- the inner core 602 preferably has a low specific gravity, a low flexural modulus, and low hardness; wherein the cover layer 608 has a higher specific gravity, a higher flexural modulus, and a higher hardness than the intermediate layer 604 and the core 602 .
- the hardness of the cover layer 608 may generally be in the range of 80 Shore C to 100 Shore C, most preferably 90 Shore C, when measured in place on the ball to achieve launch conditions that satisfy Equation 1, 2, 3, or 4 in accordance with the exemplary embodiment of the present invention; however, various other hardness ranges for cover layer 608 may also be used so long as it adheres to the composition above without departing from the scope and content of the present invention.
- a multi-layer golf ball that is substantially similar to the first embodiment may be disclosed that provides a coefficient of restitution (COR) gradient from slow to fast, e.g., the inner core 602 has a lower COR value, the intermediate layer 604 has a higher COR value, and the cover layer 608 has an even higher COR value.
- the golf ball 600 may also contain a higher moment of inertia wherein the inner core 602 may have various fillers removed while other fillers may be adding various fillers to the cover 608 .
- fillers from inner core 602 combined with the addition of fillers to cover 608 may create additional mass towards the outer perimeter of the golf ball 600 ; hence generating a higher moment of inertia within golf ball 600 to create a lower initial spin rate ⁇ i without departing from the scope and content of the present invention.
- FIG. 6 also shows a further alternative embodiment of the present invention wherein the golf ball 600 may have a relatively low Atti compression in the range of 70 to 80 to achieve launch conditions that satisfy Equation 1, 2, 3, or 4 in accordance with the exemplary embodiment of the present invention.
- a golf ball 600 with a really low compression may create an undesirably soft feel for some golfers; thus creating a preferable compression in the range of 80 to 90.
- golf ball 600 may have the cover 608 coated with a material that optimizes a coefficient of friction to achieve launch conditions that satisfy Equation 1, 2, 3, or 4 in accordance with the exemplary embodiment of the present invention.
- a material that optimizes a coefficient of friction may be disclosed by U.S. Pat. No. 5,827,133; the disclosure of which is incorporated here by reference in its entirety. It should be noted that although this film that optimizes a coefficient of friction may generally be applied to the golf ball, it could alternatively be applied to the face of the golf club or to both the golf ball and the face of the golf club to create the same effect or even enhancing the reduction in coefficient of friction all without departing from the scope and content of the present invention.
- golf ball 600 may also be oversized to achieve launch conditions that satisfy Equation 1, 2, 3, or 4 in accordance with the exemplary embodiment of the present invention.
- the details of this oversized golf ball with a diameter greater than the standard 1.68 inches may be found in U.S. Pat. No. 5,273,287; the disclosure of which is incorporated by reference in its entirety.
- FIG. 7 shows yet another embodiment of the present invention directed at a multi-layer golf ball 700 comprising an inner core 702 , at least one intermediate core layer 704 , and outer core layer 706 , and a cover layer 708 .
- a volume-decreasing gradient is present, e.g., the volume of the inner core 702 is larger than volume of the intermediate core layer 704 , which is larger than the volume of the outer core 706 , which is larger than the volume of the cover layer 708 .
- a hardness-increasing gradient may also be present in this alternative embodiment as shown in FIG.
- a specific gravity gradient may also be present, progressing form an inner core 702 with a lower specific gravity to an outer core 704 with a higher specific gravity.
- the specific gravity gradient may not progress all the way through the cover layer 708 , as it may be preferred that the specific gravity of the outer core layer 706 be higher than the specific gravity of the cover layer 708 .
Abstract
Description
- The present invention relates to a golf club and golf ball combination that creates high launch and low spin characteristics that maximize the travel distance of a golf ball after impact with a golf club. More specifically, the present invention relates to a golf club capable of generating a high launch angle and a low spin rate via a lower center of gravity. Additionally the present invention also relates to a golf ball having an unusually low spin rate along with certain ratios of the coefficient of lift (CL), coefficient of drag (CD), and the lift-to-drag ratio (CL/CD) measured near the beginning of the flight to the same parameters measured later in flight.
- The complexities of golf club design are known; further, the complexities of golf ball design are also known. The design specifications for a golf club and a golf ball directly impact the launch conditions generated by a golf swing. Designed separately, the design of a golf club and a golf ball can both individually contribute to improved performance characteristics such as high launch and low spin. However, these designs, although effective in maximizing launch angle and minimizing spin rate individually, fail to take into consideration the additional performance gains that are possible by correctly matching a golf club and a golf ball. Thus, varying the performance characteristics of a golf club in parallel with the performance characteristic of a golf ball can produce a synergistic improvement in the performance characteristics of both of the components.
- With respect to the improvements in golf club heads, the current industry has been focused primarily on creating a golf club head that controls and improves the flight characteristics of a golf ball after impact with the golf club head. Amongst the prominent considerations in golf club head design are loft, lie, face angle, horizontal face bulge, vertical face roll, center of gravity, rotational moment of inertia, material selection, and overall head weight. In addition to the above mentioned design variations, the center of gravity is often adjusted to be moved to various locations within the golf club head to increase launch angle and control the spin of the golf ball. One example is described in U.S. Pat. No. 7,407,447 to Beach et al. for a Movable Weight for a Golf Club Head. In that example, embodiments of movable weights, such as weight assemblies and weight screws, for a golf club head are disclosed. More specifically, in one configuration, the club head CG is in a center-back location, resulting in a high launch angle and a relatively low initial spin rate for optimal distance.
- Another example is described in U.S. Pat. App. 2007/0155532 to Adams for a Golf Club Head. In that example, a golf club head includes a club head body having a striking face, a soleplate, a toe, a heel and a hosel, wherein at least a portion of the body shell is composed of a flexible material having a density of less than approximately 2.5 g/cm3, and a tensile strength of at least approximately 465 MPa/(g/cm3). More specifically, one may position the weight member(s) on the soleplate, but position it all the way back to increase launch angle while keeping the backspin relatively low (High Launch/Low Spin) or position it all the way forward to control launch angle, lower spin and also lower the amount of gear effect spin caused by off-center hits.
- With respect to golf ball design, the golfing industry has been struggling between the two dichotomies of golf ball designs to either create a hard ball with enhanced flight characteristics or a soft ball with enhanced feel and control. Hard golf balls that have good flight characteristics as well as good rebounding characteristics that minimize spin can tend to sacrifice feel and control. Soft golf balls on the other hand, although capable of providing great feel and control, have less than optimal rebounding characteristics, and generally create too much spin to maximize distance.
- One example of a hard ball design can be seen in U.S. Pat. No. 6,743,124 to Tsunoda et al. for a Golf Ball. In that example, a golf ball with a low spin rate, a high launch angle, and an increased flight distance is characterized by a ratio of primary natural frequency of the golf ball in a direction in which the ball deforms to a primary natural frequency of the ball in vibration mode along a direction of torsion (fc/fn) being in the range of 2.22 to 2.45. More specifically, the solid core can effectively be formed from a plurality of layers having a complex modulus smallest at the inner core, larger at the intermediate layer(s) and the largest at the outermost layer to achieve a value (fc/fn) in the range of 2.22 to 2.45.
- Alternatively, other examples attempt to strike a balance between a hard golf ball having increased distance and a soft golf ball having increased feel and control. For example, in U.S. Pat. No. 7,232,383 to Kato et al. for a Three-Piece Solid Golf Ball, a three-piece solid golf ball having long flight distance by accomplishing low ball rotation rate and high launch angle at the time of hitting while maintaining good shot feel is disclosed. More specifically, a three-piece solid golf ball comprising a core composed of a center and an intermediate layer formed on the center, and a cover covering the core and having many dimples on the surface thereof is disclosed.
- In another example described by U.S. Pat. No. 7,354,357 to Sullivan et al., a Multi-Layer Core Golf Ball having an improved multi-layer construction displaying enhanced playing characteristics including high speed, high launch, and low spin is disclosed. More specifically, a golf ball that displays improved performance in areas such as distance and feel for lower swing speed players having a relatively large solid inner core, with at least one solid outer core layer surrounding the inner core, and a thin cover layer surrounding the outermost core layer is disclosed.
- Despite numerous attempts to improve ball flight characteristics in terms of high launch and low spin, the current art has been focused on addressing each of the two important components separately. More specifically, the current art utilizes shifting of weights in a golf club head as well as shifts in the center of gravity location within a golf club head without any consideration for a matching ball design. Alternatively, the current art has also attempted to address the problem by focusing on golf ball design utilizing multiple materials having different hardnesses, different core constructions, or even different complex modulus variations with little consideration for matching the golf club head.
- Hence, it can be seen that there is a need in the field for a golf club and golf ball combination that work in conjunction to optimize and enhance the performance characteristics of the respectively paired equipment. More specifically, there is a need for a golf club that optimizes its design characteristics around that of a golf ball to maximize high launch and low spin; and for a golf ball that optimizes its design characteristics around that of a golf club to maximize high launch and low spin, while providing matching aerodynamics to optimize the overall flight performance.
- In one aspect of the present invention, a golf club and ball combination may comprises a golf club and a golf ball; wherein said golf ball achieves a launch angle (α) and an initial spin rate (ωi) relationship defined as 86α+ωi≦4310 (where α is in degrees and ωi is in rpm) when struck by the golf club.
- In another aspect of the present invention, a golf club and ball combination comprises a golf ball with a beginning to end coefficient of lift ratio of 0.64 to 3.20, a beginning to end coefficient of drag ratio of 0.76 to 0.99, and a beginning to end ratio of lift to drag ratio of 0.65 to 3.40; and a golf club with a center of gravity located 10 mm to 30 mm above a ground level. “Beginning to end” coefficient ratios, as used in the current invention may generally refer to the coefficient measured during the beginning (ascent) portion of the flight divided by the coefficient measured during the end (descent) portion of the flight.
- In a further aspect of the present invention, a method of maximizing travel distance of a golf ball comprises adjusting a center of gravity of a golf club to be located 10 mm to 30 mm above a ground level of the golf club, adjusting a beginning to end coefficient of lift ratio for the golf ball to be 0.64 to 3.20, adjusting a beginning to end coefficient of drag ratio of the golf ball to be 0.76 to 0.99, and adjusting a beginning to end ratio of lift to drag ratio of the golf ball to be 0.65 to 3.40; wherein the golf ball achieves a launch angle (α) and an initial spin rate (ωi) relationship defined as 86α+ωi≦3710 when struck by the golf club.
- These and other features, aspects and advantages of the present invention will become better understood with references to the following drawings, description and claims.
- The foregoing and other features and advantages of the invention will be apparent from the following description of the invention as illustrated in the accompanying drawings. The accompanying drawings, which are incorporated herein and form a part of the specification, further serve to explain the principles of the invention and to enable a person skilled in the pertinent art to make and use the invention.
-
FIG. 1 shows a perspective view of a golf club head and a golf ball in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention; -
FIG. 2 shows a perspective view of a golf club in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention; -
FIG. 3 shows a graphical representation of the effect of the center of gravity (CG) location on initial backspin; -
FIG. 4 shows a graphical representation of the effect of the center of gravity (CG) location on launch angle; -
FIG. 5 shows the forces acting on a golf ball in flight; -
FIG. 6 shows a cross-sectional view of a golf ball in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention; and -
FIG. 7 shows a further cross-sectional view of a golf ball in accordance with a further alternative embodiment of the present invention. - The following detailed description is of the best currently contemplated modes of carrying out the invention. The description is not to be taken in a limiting sense, but is made merely for the purpose of illustrating the general principles of the invention, since the scope of the invention is best defined by the appended claims.
- Various inventive features are described below and can each be used independently of one another or in combination with other features. However, any single inventive feature may not address any or all of the problems discussed above or may only address one of the problems discussed above. Further, one or more of the problems discussed above may not be fully addressed by any of the features described below.
- The present invention generally relates to a golf club and golf ball combination that create a high launch and low spinning golf ball upon impact with a golf club. More specifically, the present invention relates to a golf club and golf ball combination wherein the golf ball achieves a launch angle α and an initial spin rate ωi that satisfy the following relationship when struck by the golf club:
-
86α+ωi≦4310 (Eq. 1) - where
- α is in degrees
- ωi is in rpm
- Even more specifically the present invention relates to a golf club having a lower center of gravity and/or a higher loft combined with a golf ball having a beginning to end coefficient of lift ratio of 0.64 to 3.20, a beginning to end coefficient of drag ratio of 0.76 to 0.99, and a beginning to end ratio of lift to drag ratio of 0.65 to 3.40. The current invention is unlike the prior art approaches on creating a high launch and low spinning golf ball that only focuses on the individual components such as a golf cub or a golf ball separately. Focusing on the individual components without taking in consideration of the additional performance enhancement capabilities that can be achieved by simultaneously adjusting and pairing the performance characteristics of both the golf club and the golf ball may not maximize the performance characteristics that can be achieved when the two components are designed in parallel with one another.
-
FIG. 1 shows agolf club 100 andgolf ball 102 combination in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention. More specifically,FIG. 1 shows the initial spin rate ωi of thegolf ball 102 and the launch angle α of thegolf ball 102 relative to theflat ground surface 108 as it is struck bygolf club 100. - Here, in the current exemplary embodiment, a
golf club 100 andgolf ball 102 combination may merge to provide launch angles and initial spin rates that satisfy Equation 1 when thegolf ball 102 is struck bygolf club 100. More preferably, the launch angles and spin rates satisfy Equation 2: -
86α+ωi≦4010 (Eq. 2) - Still more preferably, the launch angles and spin rates satisfy Equation 3:
-
86α+ωi≦3710 (Eq. 3) - Most preferably, the launch angles and spin rates satisfy Equation 4:
-
86α+ωi≦3310 (Eq. 4) - Equations 1 through 4 characterize the initial conditions of the
golf ball 102's flight performance and ultimately affect the total distance of travel of thegolf ball 102. When the initial spin rate is too high for a given launch angle, the trajectory is not optimal and distance is lost. - In accordance with the present invention, the greatest distance improvements are achieved with unusually high launch angles in combination with initial spin rates that satisfy
Equation - Here, in the current exemplary embodiment, in order to achieve the
maximum golf ball 102 travel distance,golf club 100 may generally be modeled in accordance to an “exemplary swing” in accordance with the present invention. The “exemplary swing”, as described in the current invention may generally have a velocity of approximately 110 miles per hour (mph), with an attack angle of approximately 2 degrees and an effective loft of approximately 13 degrees, while maintaining the static loft angle of approximately 9.5 degrees and impacting the golf ball at the geometric center of the face to achieve ωi and α values that satisfyEquation -
FIG. 2 shows agolf club 200 designed to satisfyEquation gravity 212 andloft angle 216 may generally affect the performance characteristics of agolf club 200 in conjunction with agolf ball 102.Golf club 200, as shown in this current exemplary embodiment may contain ahead 202 at a distal end of thegolf club 200, ahosel 204 connected to head 202, ashaft 206 connected to thehosel 204, and agrip 208 connected to theshaft 206.FIG. 2 also shows aground level 210 on which thehead 202 rests, along with the center ofgravity 212 ofgolf club head 202 located at adistance 214 from theground level 210. -
Head 202 in this current exemplary embodiment may generally be applicable towards a driver type head and have a preferable volume range of approximately 300 cubic centimeters to approximately 600 cubic centimeters, and more preferably in the volume range of approximately 350 cubic centimeters to approximately 550 cubic centimeters, even more preferably in the volume range of approximately 375 cubic centimeters to approximately 475 cubic centimeters, and most preferably approximately 420 centimeters to approximately 460 centimeters; all without departing from the scope of the present invention.Head 202, being generally applicable towards drivers, may generally haveloft angles 216 ranging from approximately 8.5 degrees to approximately 15.0 degrees. -
Hosel 204 in this current exemplary embodiment may be used to connect thehead 202 toshaft 206, and may generally be made from a low density material such as aluminum located substantially above a plane located at a peak of the crown section ofhead 202. Thehosel 204 may also provide interchangeability betweenvarious head 202 andvarious shafts 206 without the need for extensive tooling without departing from the scope and content of the present invention. -
Shaft 206 in this current exemplary embodiment may be used to connect thehead 202 and thehosel 204 to thegrip 208 to complete thegolf club 200; however, various other components in addition toshaft 206 may be used to completegolf club 200 such as a ferrule, a grip tape, a glue, or any other components that may typically be used within agolf club 200 without departing from the scope of the present invention. -
Golf club 200 and more specifically head 202, as shown in the current exemplary embodiment, may generally rest on aground level 210 in an address position to create a reference point from where the center ofgravity 212 may be measured to yield adistance 214.Distance 214, as shown in the current exemplary embodiment refers to a height in the y-direction as indicated by the axis oforientation 201 inFIG. 2 ; however, other identifiers may be used to identify this distance away from the ground level 220 such as x-direction, or z-direction without departing from the scope and content of the present invention. In this currentexemplary embodiment distance 214 may generally be in the range of approximately 5 millimeters to approximately 35 millimeters, more preferably in the range of approximately 10 millimeters to approximately 30 millimeters, most preferably in the range of approximately 15 millimeters to approximately 25 millimeters all without departing from the scope and content of the present invention. -
FIG. 3 shows a graphical representation of the effect of the location of the center ofgravity 212 with respect to changes in the initial spin rate ωi in accordance with an exemplary embodiment of the present invention.FIG. 3 shows that the initial spin rate ωi on a golf ball can be dramatically reduced as the center ofgravity 212 moves closer and closer to theground level 210. -
FIG. 4 shows a graphical representation of the effect of the location of the center ofgravity 212 with respect to changes in launch angle α in accordance with an exemplary embodiment of the present invention.FIG. 4 shows that the launch angle α increases as the center ofgravity 212 moves closer and closer to theground level 210. - As it can be seen from
FIG. 3 andFIG. 4 above, decreasing thedistance 214 moves the location of the center ofgravity 212 closer to theground level 210; which will decrease the initial spin rate ωi and increase the launch angle α in accordance with an exemplary embodiment of the present invention. The increased launch angle α combined with the decrease in initial spin rate ωi may allow thegolf club head 202 to impart to the golf ball launch conditions that satisfyEquation - Although adjusting the location, and more specifically, the
height distance 214 of the center ofgravity 212 may generally be the preferable methodology to satisfyEquation loft angle 216 to significantly increase a without departing from the scope of the present invention. More specifically,loft angle 216 may be adjusted to range from approximately 8.5 degrees to approximately 15.0 degrees for a driver type golf head to satisfyEquation - In a further alternative embodiment of the present invention,
loft angle 216 may be further increased to achieve a higher launch angle α through adjustments in theshaft 206. In this alternative embodiment,shaft 206 may effective increase a higher launch angle α without changing theloft angle 216 by adjusting theway shaft 206 whips and snaps at the point of impact. More specifically,shaft 206 in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention may generally have a softer tip at the tip section ofshaft 206 in order to crease a lower kick point that may effectively increase launch angle α without adjusting theloft angle 216 without departing from the scope and content of the present invention. In essence,shaft 206 may allowgolf club 200 to be swinging up on a golf ball, which effectively adds launch angle α without addingloft angle 216. Alternatively,shaft 206 may also contain a swing hinge, a higher kick point, a difference in stiffness variation, or any other mechanism capable of increasing launch angle α without addingloft angle 216 all without departing from the scope and content of the present invention. -
FIG. 5 shows the forces acting during flight on agolf ball 500 in accordance with an exemplary embodiment of the present invention. The total aerodynamic force FA acting on agolf ball 500 is typically resolved into orthogonal components of lift (FL) and drag (FD). Lift is defined as the aerodynamic force component acting perpendicular to the flight path, and it results from a difference in pressure created by a distortion in the air flow that is caused by the backspin ω of the ball. Drag is defined as the aerodynamic force component acting parallel to the ball flight direction. As the ball travels through the air, the pressure at the front of the ball is greater than the pressure at the rear of the ball, the difference being primarily responsible for the drag force. - More particularly,
FIG. 5 shows the various forces as enumerated inEquation 5 below. -
F=F L +F D +F G (Eq. 5) - where
- F=total force vector acting on the ball
- FL=
lift force vector 508 - FD=
drag force vector 512 - FG=
gravity force vector 514 - The lift force vector (FL) 508 acts in a direction dictated by the cross product of the spin vector and the velocity vector. The drag force vector (FD) 512 acts in a direction that is directly opposite the velocity vector. The magnitudes of the lift and drag forces of
Equation 5 are calculated in Equations 6 and 7, respectively: -
FL=0.5CLρAV2 (Eq. 6) -
FD=0.5CDρAV2 (Eq. 7) - where
- ρ=density of air(slugs/ft3)
- A=projected area of the ball (ft2) ((π/4)D2)
- D=ball diameter (ft)
- V=ball speed (ft/s)
- CL=dimensionless lift coefficient
- CD=dimensionless drag coefficient
- Lift and drag coefficients are typically used to quantify the aerodynamic forces imparted to a ball in flight and are dependent on air density, air viscosity, ball speed, and spin rate. The influence of all these parameters may be captured by two dimensionless parameters: Spin Ratio (SR) and Reynolds Number (NRe). Spin Ratio is the rotational surface speed of the ball divided by ball speed. Reynolds Number quantifies the ratio of inertial to viscous forces acting on the golf ball moving through air. SR and NRe are calculated in Equations 8 and 9 below:
-
SR=ω(D/2)/V (Eq. 8) -
N Re =DVρ/μ (Eq. 9) - where
- ω=ball rotation rate (radians/s) (2π(rpm/60))
- rpm=ball spin rate ω (revolution/min)
- V=ball speed (ft/s)
- D=ball diameter (ft)
- ρ=air density (slugs/ft3)
- μ=absolute viscosity of air (lb sec/ft2)
- There is a number of suitable methods for determining the lift and drag coefficients for a given range of SR and NRe, which include the use of indoor test ranges with ballistic screen technology. U.S. Pat. No. 5,682,230, the entire disclosure of which is incorporated by reference herein, teaches the use of a series of ballistic screens to acquire lift and drag coefficients. U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,186,002 and 6,285,445, also incorporated in their entirety by reference herein, disclose methods for determining lift and drag coefficients for a given range of velocities and spin rates using an indoor test range, wherein the values for CL and CD are related to SR and NRe for each shot. One skilled in the art of golf ball aerodynamics testing may readily determine the lift and drag coefficients through the use of an indoor test range, or alternatively in a wind tunnel.
- In order to better classify the above variables, it is often more effective to characterize the aerodynamics of a
golf ball 500 based on a ratio of the coefficient near the beginning of a flight over the coefficient near the end of the flight, labeled here as a “beginning to end coefficient ratio”. This beginning to end coefficient ratio can be applicable to the coefficient of lift (CL), coefficient of drag (CD), and the lift-to-drag ratio (CL/CD), yielding a beginning to end coefficient of lift ratio (CL-Beg/CL-End), a beginning to end coefficient of drag ratio (CD-Beg/CD-End), and beginning to end ratio of lift to drag -
- For the purposes of this invention, a Reynolds Number (NRe) of approximately 220,000 with a Spin Ratio (SR) of approximately 0.054 is used to represent the exemplary aerodynamic conditions during the beginning (ascent) portion of the golf ball flight. These conditions generally translate into a
golf ball 500 velocity of approximately 168 mph at a spin rate of approximately 1800 rpm. - Furthermore, a Reynolds Number (NRe) of approximately 80,000 with a Spin Ratio (SR) of approximately 0.120 is used to represent the exemplary aerodynamic conditions during the end (descent) portion of golf ball flight. These conditions generally translate into a
golf ball 500 velocity of approximately 61 mph at a spin rate of approximately 1460 rpm. - In this current exemplary embodiment the beginning to end coefficient of lift ratio (CL-Beg/CL-End) may be approximately within the range of 0.64 to 3.20, more preferably within the range of 0.72 to 2.03, most preferably within the range of 0.80 to 0.86. Additionally, the beginning to end coefficient of drag ratio (CD-Beg/CD-End) may be approximately within the range of 0.76 to 0.99, more preferably within the range of 0.82 to 0.96, most preferably within the range of 0.87 to 0.93. Lastly, the beginning to end lift to drag ratio
-
- may be approximately within the range of 0.65 to 3.40, more preferably within the range of 0.76 to 2.25, most preferably within the range of 0.86 to 1.10 all without departing from the scope and content of the present invention.
- The above discussion only provides a brief introduction to the aerodynamic properties of a
golf ball 500 that can be combined with agolf club 200 to achieve the high launch and low spin characteristics in accordance with an exemplary embodiment of the present invention; more details regarding the above discussion relating to the aerodynamic properties and forces acting on agolf ball 500 may be found in U.S. Pat. No. 7,226,369, the disclosure of which is incorporated by reference in its entirety herein. -
FIG. 6 shows amulti-layered golf ball 600 capable of achieving launch conditions that satisfyEquation Golf ball 600 may generally have aninner core 602, acover layer 608, and at least oneintermediate layer 604 between theinner core 602 and thecover layer 608. Theinner core 602, theintermediate layers 604, and thecover layer 608 may all be constructed to have different properties. In an exemplary embodiment, theinner core 602 preferably has a low specific gravity, a low flexural modulus, and low hardness; wherein thecover layer 608 has a higher specific gravity, a higher flexural modulus, and a higher hardness than theintermediate layer 604 and thecore 602. The hardness of thecover layer 608 may generally be in the range of 80 Shore C to 100 Shore C, most preferably 90 Shore C, when measured in place on the ball to achieve launch conditions that satisfyEquation cover layer 608 may also be used so long as it adheres to the composition above without departing from the scope and content of the present invention. - In another embodiment of the present invention, a multi-layer golf ball that is substantially similar to the first embodiment may be disclosed that provides a coefficient of restitution (COR) gradient from slow to fast, e.g., the
inner core 602 has a lower COR value, theintermediate layer 604 has a higher COR value, and thecover layer 608 has an even higher COR value. In a further alternative embodiment, thegolf ball 600 may also contain a higher moment of inertia wherein theinner core 602 may have various fillers removed while other fillers may be adding various fillers to thecover 608. The elimination of fillers frominner core 602, combined with the addition of fillers to cover 608 may create additional mass towards the outer perimeter of thegolf ball 600; hence generating a higher moment of inertia withingolf ball 600 to create a lower initial spin rate ωi without departing from the scope and content of the present invention. -
FIG. 6 also shows a further alternative embodiment of the present invention wherein thegolf ball 600 may have a relatively low Atti compression in the range of 70 to 80 to achieve launch conditions that satisfyEquation golf ball 600 with a really low compression may create an undesirably soft feel for some golfers; thus creating a preferable compression in the range of 80 to 90. - In a further alternative embodiment of the present invention,
golf ball 600 may have thecover 608 coated with a material that optimizes a coefficient of friction to achieve launch conditions that satisfyEquation - In an even further alternative embodiment of the present invention,
golf ball 600 may also be oversized to achieve launch conditions that satisfyEquation -
FIG. 7 shows yet another embodiment of the present invention directed at amulti-layer golf ball 700 comprising aninner core 702, at least oneintermediate core layer 704, andouter core layer 706, and acover layer 708. In this embodiment, a volume-decreasing gradient is present, e.g., the volume of theinner core 702 is larger than volume of theintermediate core layer 704, which is larger than the volume of theouter core 706, which is larger than the volume of thecover layer 708. A hardness-increasing gradient may also be present in this alternative embodiment as shown inFIG. 7 resulting in a softinner core 702, a slightly harderintermediate core 704, a still harderouter core 706, and an evenharder cover layer 708. Finally, a specific gravity gradient may also be present, progressing form aninner core 702 with a lower specific gravity to anouter core 704 with a higher specific gravity. However, it should be noted that in this alternative embodiment the specific gravity gradient may not progress all the way through thecover layer 708, as it may be preferred that the specific gravity of theouter core layer 706 be higher than the specific gravity of thecover layer 708. - The above discussion only provides a brief introduction to the material properties of a
golf ball 700 that can be combined with agolf club 200 to achieve high launch angle α and low initial spin ωi characteristics in accordance with an exemplary embodiment of the present invention; however, more details regarding the above discussion relating to the material properties of agolf ball 700 in accordance with the present invention may be found in U.S. Pat. No. 7,354,357, the disclosure of which is incorporated by reference in its entirety herein. - It should be understood, of course, that the foregoing relates to exemplary embodiments of the invention and that modifications may be made without departing from the scope and content of the invention as set forth in the following claims.
Claims (23)
Priority Applications (3)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US12/404,701 US20100234125A1 (en) | 2009-03-16 | 2009-03-16 | High launch and low spin golf ball and golf club combination |
JP2010055369A JP2010214111A (en) | 2009-03-16 | 2010-03-12 | High launch and low spin golf ball and golf club |
CN2010102147765A CN101874923A (en) | 2009-03-16 | 2010-03-16 | The golf of the low rotation of high emission and golf clubs combination |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US12/404,701 US20100234125A1 (en) | 2009-03-16 | 2009-03-16 | High launch and low spin golf ball and golf club combination |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
US20100234125A1 true US20100234125A1 (en) | 2010-09-16 |
Family
ID=42731159
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US12/404,701 Abandoned US20100234125A1 (en) | 2009-03-16 | 2009-03-16 | High launch and low spin golf ball and golf club combination |
Country Status (3)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (1) | US20100234125A1 (en) |
JP (1) | JP2010214111A (en) |
CN (1) | CN101874923A (en) |
Cited By (13)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20120278048A1 (en) * | 2011-04-28 | 2012-11-01 | Seiji Hayase | Method for predicting modal damping ratio of composite head |
US20130090189A1 (en) * | 2011-10-05 | 2013-04-11 | Aero-X Golf, Inc. | Kit for a driver and golf ball that provides optimum performance |
US9144722B2 (en) | 2013-03-14 | 2015-09-29 | Karsten Manufacturing Corporation | Golf club heads with optimized characteristics and related methods |
US9168429B2 (en) | 2013-03-14 | 2015-10-27 | Karsten Manufacturing Corporation | Golf club heads with optimized characteristics and related methods |
KR20150126058A (en) * | 2013-03-14 | 2015-11-10 | 카스턴 매뉴팩츄어링 코오포레이숀 | Golf club heads with optimized characteristics and related methods |
US9186561B2 (en) | 2013-03-14 | 2015-11-17 | Karsten Manufacturing Corporation | Golf club heads with optimized characteristics and related methods |
US20170182373A1 (en) * | 2015-12-24 | 2017-06-29 | Bridgestone Corporation | Golf ball |
US10080933B2 (en) | 2013-03-14 | 2018-09-25 | Karsten Manufacturing Corporation | Golf club heads with optimized characteristics and related methods |
US10207161B2 (en) | 2016-11-18 | 2019-02-19 | Karsten Manufacturing Corporation | Club head having balanced impact and swing performance characteristics |
US10434381B2 (en) | 2013-03-14 | 2019-10-08 | Karsten Manufacturing Corporation | Club head having balanced impact and swing performance characteristics |
US10610745B2 (en) | 2013-03-14 | 2020-04-07 | Karsten Manufacturing Corporation | Golf club heads with optimized characteristics and related methods |
US10967232B2 (en) | 2019-05-15 | 2021-04-06 | Karsten Manufacturing Corporation | Club head having balanced impact and swing performance characteristics |
US11179610B2 (en) * | 2014-07-03 | 2021-11-23 | Taylor Made Golf Company, Inc. | Golf club head |
Citations (17)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US5273287A (en) * | 1991-11-27 | 1993-12-28 | Molitor Robert P | Golf ball |
US5682230A (en) * | 1995-11-01 | 1997-10-28 | United States Golf Association | Test range for determining the aerodynamic characteristics of a ball in flight |
US5827133A (en) * | 1997-04-25 | 1998-10-27 | Chang; Dale U. | Reduced spin golf ball |
US6186002B1 (en) * | 1998-04-21 | 2001-02-13 | United States Golf Associates | Method for determining coefficients of lift and drag of a golf ball |
US6190269B1 (en) * | 1998-07-14 | 2001-02-20 | Sumitomo Rubber Industries, Ltd. | Multi-piece solid golf ball |
US6285445B1 (en) * | 1999-09-17 | 2001-09-04 | Acushnet Company | Method for determining aerodynamic characteristics of a golf ball |
US6658371B2 (en) * | 1997-09-03 | 2003-12-02 | Acushnet Company | Method for matching golfers with a driver and ball |
US6743124B2 (en) * | 2001-03-08 | 2004-06-01 | Sumitomo Rubber Industries, Ltd. | Golf ball |
US20050272516A1 (en) * | 2004-06-07 | 2005-12-08 | William Gobush | Launch monitor |
US20060068927A1 (en) * | 2004-09-01 | 2006-03-30 | Accu-Sport International, Inc. | System, method and computer program product for estimating club swing condition(s) from ball launch measurements |
US7226369B2 (en) * | 2003-01-06 | 2007-06-05 | Acushnet Company | Golf ball with improved flight performance |
US20070155532A1 (en) * | 2005-08-25 | 2007-07-05 | Adams Golf Ip, L.P. | Golf club head |
US7323383B2 (en) * | 2002-06-17 | 2008-01-29 | Infineon Technologies Ag | Method for fabricating an NROM memory cell arrangement |
US20080039228A1 (en) * | 2005-04-21 | 2008-02-14 | Acushnet Company | Golf club head |
US7354357B2 (en) * | 2004-02-06 | 2008-04-08 | Acushnet Company | Multi-layer core golf ball |
US7407447B2 (en) * | 2002-11-08 | 2008-08-05 | Taylor Made Golf Company, Inc. | Movable weights for a golf club head |
US7419441B2 (en) * | 2002-11-08 | 2008-09-02 | Taylor Made Golf Company, Inc. | Golf club head weight reinforcement |
Family Cites Families (2)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
JP2001299969A (en) * | 2000-04-26 | 2001-10-30 | Sumitomo Rubber Ind Ltd | Golf club head |
JP5283332B2 (en) * | 2006-12-28 | 2013-09-04 | ダンロップスポーツ株式会社 | Golf ball |
-
2009
- 2009-03-16 US US12/404,701 patent/US20100234125A1/en not_active Abandoned
-
2010
- 2010-03-12 JP JP2010055369A patent/JP2010214111A/en active Pending
- 2010-03-16 CN CN2010102147765A patent/CN101874923A/en active Pending
Patent Citations (17)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US5273287A (en) * | 1991-11-27 | 1993-12-28 | Molitor Robert P | Golf ball |
US5682230A (en) * | 1995-11-01 | 1997-10-28 | United States Golf Association | Test range for determining the aerodynamic characteristics of a ball in flight |
US5827133A (en) * | 1997-04-25 | 1998-10-27 | Chang; Dale U. | Reduced spin golf ball |
US6658371B2 (en) * | 1997-09-03 | 2003-12-02 | Acushnet Company | Method for matching golfers with a driver and ball |
US6186002B1 (en) * | 1998-04-21 | 2001-02-13 | United States Golf Associates | Method for determining coefficients of lift and drag of a golf ball |
US6190269B1 (en) * | 1998-07-14 | 2001-02-20 | Sumitomo Rubber Industries, Ltd. | Multi-piece solid golf ball |
US6285445B1 (en) * | 1999-09-17 | 2001-09-04 | Acushnet Company | Method for determining aerodynamic characteristics of a golf ball |
US6743124B2 (en) * | 2001-03-08 | 2004-06-01 | Sumitomo Rubber Industries, Ltd. | Golf ball |
US7323383B2 (en) * | 2002-06-17 | 2008-01-29 | Infineon Technologies Ag | Method for fabricating an NROM memory cell arrangement |
US7407447B2 (en) * | 2002-11-08 | 2008-08-05 | Taylor Made Golf Company, Inc. | Movable weights for a golf club head |
US7419441B2 (en) * | 2002-11-08 | 2008-09-02 | Taylor Made Golf Company, Inc. | Golf club head weight reinforcement |
US7226369B2 (en) * | 2003-01-06 | 2007-06-05 | Acushnet Company | Golf ball with improved flight performance |
US7354357B2 (en) * | 2004-02-06 | 2008-04-08 | Acushnet Company | Multi-layer core golf ball |
US20050272516A1 (en) * | 2004-06-07 | 2005-12-08 | William Gobush | Launch monitor |
US20060068927A1 (en) * | 2004-09-01 | 2006-03-30 | Accu-Sport International, Inc. | System, method and computer program product for estimating club swing condition(s) from ball launch measurements |
US20080039228A1 (en) * | 2005-04-21 | 2008-02-14 | Acushnet Company | Golf club head |
US20070155532A1 (en) * | 2005-08-25 | 2007-07-05 | Adams Golf Ip, L.P. | Golf club head |
Cited By (39)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20120278048A1 (en) * | 2011-04-28 | 2012-11-01 | Seiji Hayase | Method for predicting modal damping ratio of composite head |
US8849635B2 (en) * | 2011-04-28 | 2014-09-30 | Sri Sports Limited | Method for predicting modal damping ratio of composite head |
US20130090189A1 (en) * | 2011-10-05 | 2013-04-11 | Aero-X Golf, Inc. | Kit for a driver and golf ball that provides optimum performance |
US11117026B2 (en) | 2013-03-14 | 2021-09-14 | Karsten Manufacturing Corporation | Golf club heads with optimized characteristics and related methods |
US11173355B2 (en) | 2013-03-14 | 2021-11-16 | Karsten Manufacturing Corporation | Golf club heads with optimized characteristics and related methods |
US10610745B2 (en) | 2013-03-14 | 2020-04-07 | Karsten Manufacturing Corporation | Golf club heads with optimized characteristics and related methods |
KR102104570B1 (en) | 2013-03-14 | 2020-04-27 | 카스턴 매뉴팩츄어링 코오포레이숀 | Golf club heads with optimized characteristics and related methods |
US9675851B2 (en) | 2013-03-14 | 2017-06-13 | Karsten Manufacturing Corporation | Golf club heads with optimized characteristics and related methods |
US11957964B2 (en) | 2013-03-14 | 2024-04-16 | Karsten Manufacturing Corporation | Club head having balanced impact and swing performance characteristics |
US9764206B2 (en) | 2013-03-14 | 2017-09-19 | Karsten Manufacturing Corporation | Golf club heads with optimized characteristics and related methods |
US9764205B2 (en) | 2013-03-14 | 2017-09-19 | Karsten Manufacturing Corporation | Golf club heads with optimized characteristics and related methods |
US10080933B2 (en) | 2013-03-14 | 2018-09-25 | Karsten Manufacturing Corporation | Golf club heads with optimized characteristics and related methods |
US11819746B2 (en) | 2013-03-14 | 2023-11-21 | Karsten Manufacturing Corporation | Golf club heads with optimized characteristics and related methods |
KR20190030780A (en) * | 2013-03-14 | 2019-03-22 | 카스턴 매뉴팩츄어링 코오포레이숀 | Golf club heads with optimized characteristics and related methods |
US10238938B2 (en) | 2013-03-14 | 2019-03-26 | Karsten Manufacturing Corporation | Golf club heads with optimized characteristics and related methods |
US10357700B2 (en) | 2013-03-14 | 2019-07-23 | Karsten Manufacturing Corporation | Golf club heads with optimized characteristics and related methods |
US10434381B2 (en) | 2013-03-14 | 2019-10-08 | Karsten Manufacturing Corporation | Club head having balanced impact and swing performance characteristics |
US10486037B2 (en) | 2013-03-14 | 2019-11-26 | Karsten Manufacturing Corporation | Golf club heads with optimized characteristics and related methods |
US11554299B2 (en) | 2013-03-14 | 2023-01-17 | Karsten Manufacturing Corporation | Golf club heads with optimized characteristics and related methods |
KR20150126058A (en) * | 2013-03-14 | 2015-11-10 | 카스턴 매뉴팩츄어링 코오포레이숀 | Golf club heads with optimized characteristics and related methods |
US9186561B2 (en) | 2013-03-14 | 2015-11-17 | Karsten Manufacturing Corporation | Golf club heads with optimized characteristics and related methods |
US9168429B2 (en) | 2013-03-14 | 2015-10-27 | Karsten Manufacturing Corporation | Golf club heads with optimized characteristics and related methods |
US10857435B2 (en) | 2013-03-14 | 2020-12-08 | Karsten Manufacturing Corporation | Golf club heads with optimized characteristics and related methods |
US11318359B2 (en) | 2013-03-14 | 2022-05-03 | Karsten Manufacturing Corporation | Golf club heads with optimized characteristics and related methods |
US11305164B2 (en) | 2013-03-14 | 2022-04-19 | Karsten Manufacturing Corporation | Club head having balanced impact and swing performance characteristics |
KR102269441B1 (en) | 2013-03-14 | 2021-06-25 | 카스턴 매뉴팩츄어링 코오포레이숀 | Golf club heads with optimized characteristics and related methods |
KR20210078581A (en) * | 2013-03-14 | 2021-06-28 | 카스턴 매뉴팩츄어링 코오포레이숀 | Golf club heads with optimized characteristics and related methods |
US9144722B2 (en) | 2013-03-14 | 2015-09-29 | Karsten Manufacturing Corporation | Golf club heads with optimized characteristics and related methods |
US10828541B2 (en) | 2013-03-14 | 2020-11-10 | Karsten Manufacturing Corporation | Club head having balanced impact and swing performance characteristics |
KR102386897B1 (en) | 2013-03-14 | 2022-04-15 | 카스턴 매뉴팩츄어링 코오포레이숀 | Golf club heads with optimized characteristics and related methods |
US11179610B2 (en) * | 2014-07-03 | 2021-11-23 | Taylor Made Golf Company, Inc. | Golf club head |
US20170182373A1 (en) * | 2015-12-24 | 2017-06-29 | Bridgestone Corporation | Golf ball |
US10864413B2 (en) | 2016-11-18 | 2020-12-15 | Karsten Manufacturing Corporation | Club head having balanced impact and swing performance characteristics |
US11358037B2 (en) | 2016-11-18 | 2022-06-14 | Karsten Manufacturing Corporation | Club head having balanced impact and swing performance characteristics |
US10556159B2 (en) | 2016-11-18 | 2020-02-11 | Karsten Manufacturing Corporation | Club head having balanced impact and swing performance characteristics |
US11738244B2 (en) | 2016-11-18 | 2023-08-29 | Karsten Manufacturing Corporation | Club head having balanced impact and swing performance characteristics |
US10207161B2 (en) | 2016-11-18 | 2019-02-19 | Karsten Manufacturing Corporation | Club head having balanced impact and swing performance characteristics |
US10967232B2 (en) | 2019-05-15 | 2021-04-06 | Karsten Manufacturing Corporation | Club head having balanced impact and swing performance characteristics |
US11541287B2 (en) | 2019-05-15 | 2023-01-03 | Karsten Manufacturing Corporation | Club head having balanced impact and swing performance characteristics |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
CN101874923A (en) | 2010-11-03 |
JP2010214111A (en) | 2010-09-30 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US20100234125A1 (en) | High launch and low spin golf ball and golf club combination | |
US6776723B2 (en) | Metal wood golf club with progressive weighting | |
US7198575B2 (en) | Golf club head | |
US9192827B2 (en) | Golf club heads with similar C.G.-neutral axis distance | |
US7699716B2 (en) | Set of iron clubs with constant ground roll | |
US9050510B2 (en) | Putter head | |
CA2846882C (en) | Balance point placement for golf putter | |
US8187120B2 (en) | Wedge type golf club head | |
JP2001509718A (en) | Method of designing an improved golf club head | |
JP2001508687A (en) | Golf club head manufactured in consideration of inertia | |
US20120233838A1 (en) | Method and apparatus for increasing and adjusting distribution of weight within a golf club head | |
US20150018119A1 (en) | Golf club head with face channel | |
US5836832A (en) | Golf ball | |
JPH11333037A (en) | Golf club and golf club set | |
JP2005185751A (en) | Iron type golf club head | |
US20120214608A1 (en) | Golf Training Driver Club With An Elevated Face And Sweet Spot | |
JP2023168998A (en) | golf club head |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: ACUSHNET COMPANY, MASSACHUSETTS Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:AOYAMA, STEVEN;CURTIS, ANDREW;STONE, DANIEL;SIGNING DATES FROM 20090220 TO 20090306;REEL/FRAME:022401/0346 |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: KOREA DEVELOPMENT BANK, NEW YORK BRANCH, NEW YORK Free format text: SECURITY AGREEMENT;ASSIGNOR:ACUSHNET COMPANY;REEL/FRAME:027346/0222 Effective date: 20111031 |
|
STCB | Information on status: application discontinuation |
Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: ACUSHNET COMPANY, MASSACHUSETTS Free format text: RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST IN PATENTS PREVIOUSLY RECORDED AT REEL/FRAME (027346/0222);ASSIGNOR:KOREA DEVELOPMENT BANK, NEW YORK BRANCH;REEL/FRAME:039939/0181 Effective date: 20160728 |