US20100327941A1 - Transimpedance Amplifier Input Stage Mixer - Google Patents

Transimpedance Amplifier Input Stage Mixer Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US20100327941A1
US20100327941A1 US12/492,682 US49268209A US2010327941A1 US 20100327941 A1 US20100327941 A1 US 20100327941A1 US 49268209 A US49268209 A US 49268209A US 2010327941 A1 US2010327941 A1 US 2010327941A1
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
input
transistors
transimpedance amplifier
output transistors
differential transimpedance
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
US12/492,682
Other versions
US8089309B2 (en
Inventor
Douglas S. Jansen
Gregory M. Flewelling
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
BAE Systems Information and Electronic Systems Integration Inc
Original Assignee
BAE Systems Information and Electronic Systems Integration Inc
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by BAE Systems Information and Electronic Systems Integration Inc filed Critical BAE Systems Information and Electronic Systems Integration Inc
Priority to US12/492,682 priority Critical patent/US8089309B2/en
Assigned to BAE SYSTEMS INFORMATION AND ELECTRONIC SYSTEMS INTEGRATION INC. reassignment BAE SYSTEMS INFORMATION AND ELECTRONIC SYSTEMS INTEGRATION INC. ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: FLEWELLING, GREGORY M., JANSEN, DOUGLAS S.
Priority to PCT/US2010/038746 priority patent/WO2010151460A1/en
Publication of US20100327941A1 publication Critical patent/US20100327941A1/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of US8089309B2 publication Critical patent/US8089309B2/en
Assigned to THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AS REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY reassignment THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AS REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY CONFIRMATORY LICENSE (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: BAE SYSTEMS, INC.
Expired - Fee Related legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06GANALOGUE COMPUTERS
    • G06G7/00Devices in which the computing operation is performed by varying electric or magnetic quantities
    • G06G7/12Arrangements for performing computing operations, e.g. operational amplifiers
    • G06G7/16Arrangements for performing computing operations, e.g. operational amplifiers for multiplication or division

Definitions

  • the invention relates to mixer circuits, and more particularly, to Gilbert cell mixers.
  • a so-called Gilbert cell or four-quadrant multiplier is a cross-coupled differential amplifier having a gain that can be linearly controlled by modulating emitter bias current.
  • the amplitude of the differential input RF signal can be linearly controlled by a differential AC voltage.
  • Gilbert cells are commonly used in a number of applications, including mixers, automatic gain control (AGC) amplifiers, amplitude and sideband modulators, amplitude modulation (AM) and sideband detectors, frequency doublers and dividers, squaring and square-root circuits.
  • the typical implementation of a Gilbert cell mixer utilizes a simple differential pair as the input transconductance stage. This is cascode connected with the Gilbert switching quad, which is typically driven by a local oscillator signal.
  • Such mixer designs suffer from a number of problems, including poor linearity of the transconductance differential amplifier input stage. Conventional techniques such as emitter degeneration can be utilized to improve linearity, but this has a direct, negative impact on noise performance of Gilbert cell mixers.
  • the device includes a Gilbert mixer stage having a cascode connected switching quad, and a differential transimpedance amplifier input stage operatively coupled to the Gilbert mixer stage.
  • the differential transimpedance amplifier input stage is for generating a current signal that is applied to the cascode connected switching quad of the Gilbert mixer stage.
  • the differential transimpedance amplifier has an output transistor, and the current signal is taken from a collector of the output transistor.
  • the differential transimpedance amplifier has closed loop negative feedback taken from an emitter of an output transistor.
  • the differential transimpedance amplifier comprises an input transistor and an output transistor.
  • An input signal is applied to a base of the input transistor, and an impedance at a collector of the input transistor produces open-loop voltage gain, and amplified signals on the collector of input transistor are applied to a base of the output transistor.
  • the current signal is taken from a collector of the output transistor.
  • the input transistor is connected in a common emitter configuration.
  • emitter voltage of the input transistor is raised by a diode.
  • the differential transimpedance amplifier can be configured with degenerated current sources for facilitating rejection of common mode input signals.
  • the device may be included, for example, in a system-on-chip (e.g., for integrated applications that require signal mixing), or may be implemented with discrete components. Any number of variations will be apparent in light of this disclosure.
  • another embodiment of the present invention provides a device for mixing signals that includes a Gilbert mixer stage having a cascode connected switching quad, and a differential transimpedance amplifier input stage operatively coupled to the Gilbert mixer stage, for generating a current signal that is applied to the cascode connected switching quad of the Gilbert mixer stage.
  • the differential transimpedance amplifier has an output transistor, and the current signal is taken from a collector of the output transistor, and the differential transimpedance amplifier has closed loop negative feedback taken from an emitter of the output transistor.
  • the differential transimpedance amplifier may further comprise an input transistor, wherein an input signal is applied to a base of the input transistor and an impedance at a collector of the input transistor produces open-loop voltage gain, and amplified signals on the collector of input transistor are applied to a base of the output transistor.
  • the input transistor is connected in a common emitter configuration.
  • emitter voltage of the input transistor is raised by a diode.
  • the differential transimpedance amplifier may be configured with degenerated current sources for facilitating rejection of common mode input signals.
  • the device may be included, for example, in a system-on-chip, or may be implemented with discrete components.
  • Another embodiment provides a device for mixing signals that includes a Gilbert mixer stage having a cascode connected switching quad, and a differential transimpedance amplifier input stage operatively coupled to the Gilbert mixer stage for generating a current signal that is applied to the cascode connected switching quad of the Gilbert mixer stage.
  • the differential transimpedance amplifier comprises an input transistor and an output transistor, and an input signal is applied to a base of the input transistor and amplified signals on the collector of input transistor are applied to a base of the output transistor.
  • the current signal is taken from a collector of the output transistor, and the differential transimpedance amplifier has closed loop negative feedback taken from an emitter of the output transistor.
  • the input transistor is connected in a common emitter configuration.
  • emitter voltage of the input transistor is raised by a diode.
  • the differential transimpedance amplifier may be configured with degenerated current sources for facilitating rejection of common mode input signals.
  • the device may be included, for example, in a system-on-chip, or may be implemented with discrete components.
  • FIG. 1 illustrates a conventional Gilbert cell mixer design.
  • FIG. 2 illustrates a transimpedance amplifier based Gilbert cell mixer, in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.
  • FIG. 3 a illustrates a transimpedance amplifier based Gilbert cell mixer, in accordance with another embodiment of the present invention.
  • FIG. 3 b illustrates a transimpedance amplifier based Gilbert cell mixer, in accordance with another embodiment of the present invention.
  • a Gilbert cell mixer design is disclosed. Instead of using a differential transconductance stage as typically done, the design employs a differential transimpedance amplifier input stage. By utilizing a transimpedance input stage to the Gilbert mixer, feedback is used to obtain higher linearity without sacrificing noise performance.
  • the transimpedance input stage supplies a current signal to the cascode connected Gilbert switching quad, so the transimpedance amplifier output is taken from the collector of the transimpedance amplifier output transistor, instead of the emitter as typically done with transimpedance amplifiers.
  • a typical Gilbert cell mixer utilizes a transconductance input stage, as illustrated by the circuit of FIG. 1 .
  • the circuit includes a differential transconductance amplifier stage (RF input stage) operatively coupled to a Gilbert cell (mixing stage).
  • the power supplies of Vcc and Vee are provided as typically done.
  • the RF input stage to the mixer has a differential transconductance pair of transistors, Q 5 and Q 6 .
  • This transistor pair converts an applied input voltage at the bases to an output current at the collectors.
  • the differential input voltage is designated as In p and In n
  • the differential output current is designated as I p and I n .
  • the differential output current I p and I n is then mixed with the local oscillator signal (LO p and LO n ) applied to the Gilbert switching quad, which is made up of Q 1 -Q 4 .
  • the differential output signal of the mixer stage (Out p and Out n ) is taken at the collectors of the Gilbert quad.
  • Q 5 and Q 6 utilize no feedback.
  • Linearity is dependent on the semiconductor process used and how much emitter degeneration is used, which is impedance element Z 5 .
  • impedance Z 5 is a resistive element for broadband applications, high linearity can be achieved at the expense of low mixer circuit gain and high noise figure.
  • Narrow band applications can partially mitigate this shortcoming by utilizing reactive components (i.e., inductors or capacitors) for Z 5 .
  • reactive components i.e., inductors or capacitors
  • the differential transconductance amplifier input stage is replaced with a transimpedance amplifier circuit utilizing negative feedback.
  • This technique provides several improvements in performance over the open-loop input stage, including higher linearity without sacrificing noise performance.
  • FIG. 2 illustrates a Gilbert cell mixer configured with a differential transimpedance amplifier input stage, in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention.
  • the circuit is implemented with transistors Q 1 -Q 8 and impedances Z 1 -Z 10 .
  • the present invention is not intended to be limited to a particular type of transistors or impedances. Rather, the mixer circuit topology shown in FIG. 2 can be implemented using any number of suitable transistor and impedance types.
  • the transistors Q 1 -Q 8 can be implemented with CMOS FETs or Bipolar Junction Transistors, or any other suitable transistor technology.
  • the impedances can be, for instance, resistive, capacitive, inductive, or a combination thereof.
  • the Gilbert cell (mixer stage) can be implemented as typically done.
  • the transimpedance amplifier is a differential circuit and has symmetrical qualities, thereby allowing analysis of one circuit half to be equally applied to the other circuit half.
  • this example embodiment can be discussed in terms of the left circuit half, which generally includes transistors Q 5 and Q 7 and impedances Z 3 , Z 5 , Z 7 , Z 8 , and Z 10 .
  • the discussion of this left circuit half will equally apply the right circuit half, which generally includes transistors Q 6 and Q 8 and impedances Z 4 , Z 6 , Z 9 , Z 8 , and Z 10 .
  • transistors Q 7 and Q 5 form a transimpedance input amplifier.
  • the RF input signal (In p ) is applied to the base of transistor Q 7 .
  • a large collector impedance Z 3 produces large open-loop voltage gain at transistor Q 7 .
  • transistor Q 7 is connected in a common emitter configuration (where impedance Z 8 is a short to ground).
  • the amplified signal on the collector of transistor Q 7 is then applied to the base of transistor Q 5 , which serves two functions.
  • transistor Q 5 buffers the signal from the collector of transistor Q 7 to drive the feedback resistance.
  • transistor Q 5 generates a current output (I p ) at the collector which is applied to the Gilbert switching quad, at the emitters of the Q 1 -Q 2 transistor pair.
  • the output would be taken from the emitter of transistor Q 5 as a voltage signal, with transistor Q 5 configured in a common collector configuration.
  • This embodiment has adapted the differential transimpedance amplifier circuit into a new configuration, where the feedback is still tapped off the emitter of transistor Q 5 , but the output is taken as a current signal (I p ) from the collector of transistor Q 5 .
  • the Gilbert switching quad (more specifically, transistors Q 1 and Q 2 of the quad) uses the current signal I P in normal fashion.
  • transistors Q 8 and Q 6 form a transimpedance input amplifier.
  • the RF input signal (In n ) is applied to the base of transistor Q 8 .
  • a large collector impedance Z 4 produces large open-loop voltage gain at transistor Q 8 .
  • transistor Q 8 is connected in a common emitter configuration (where impedance Z 8 is a short to ground).
  • the amplified signal on the collector of transistor Q 8 is then applied to the base of transistor Q 6 , which serves two functions.
  • transistor Q 6 buffers the signal from the collector of transistor Q 8 to drive the feedback resistance.
  • transistor Q 6 generates a current output (I n ) at the collector which is applied to the Gilbert switching quad, at the emitters of the Q 3 -Q 4 transistor pair.
  • I n current output
  • the output of a typical differential transimpedance amplifier circuit would be taken from the emitter of transistor Q 6 as a voltage signal, with transistor Q 6 configured in a common collector configuration.
  • This embodiment has adapted the differential transimpedance amplifier circuit, where the feedback is still tapped off the emitter of transistor Q 6 , but the output is taken as a current signal (I n ) from the collector of transistor Q 6 .
  • the Gilbert quad (more specifically, transistors Q 3 and Q 4 of the quad) uses the current signal I n in normal fashion.
  • the differential transimpedance amplifier based approach has advantages over a conventional transconductance approach in the following ways.
  • the closed loop feedback can greatly improve the linearity of the mixer circuit, without sacrificing gain or noise figure. This can be done with resistive elements to maintain a broad band response.
  • improved linearity is achieved by increasing the degeneration impedance, Z 5 in FIG. 1 .
  • this reduces the gain and increases the noise figure significantly, especially if resistive degeneration is used in a broad band application.
  • a mixer configured with a differential transimpedance amplifier input stage as described herein decouples linearity and gain. As such, high gain and low noise figure can be achieved simultaneously with high linearity.
  • Impedance elements Z 8 and Z 10 generally enable the mixer circuit to behave in a differential way.
  • the In n input can be left open or terminated while the In p input is driven with a signal, or vise-versa. Differential behavior partially reconstructs an inverted copy of the applied RF input signal in the non-drive half of the input stage.
  • Impedance Z 8 can be, for example, any passive device or combination of such devices, one or more diode drops, an active current source, or shorted directly to ground.
  • Impedances Z 7 , Z 9 , and Z 10 effectively shape the frequency response and gain of mixer circuit, and can be implemented, for instance, with one or more passive devices (e.g., resistors, capacitors, inductors, or combination thereof).
  • impedances Z 7 , Z 9 , and Z 10 can be implemented as one or more diode drops or an active current source, as discussed with reference to FIGS. 3 a - b.
  • the RF input (In p and In n ) can be applied to the transimpedance input stage through an impedance network.
  • This impedance can be tailored to meet the overall circuit gain and input matching requirements.
  • the mixer circuit gain for the RF input In p is generally proportional to Z 1 /Z 5 ⁇ Z 7 ⁇ (Z 10 /2), where ⁇ represents parallel combination of networks.
  • the mixer circuit gain for the RF input In n is generally proportional to Z 2 /Z 6 ⁇ Z 9 ⁇ (Z 10 /2).
  • the transistors shown in this example of FIG. 2 are bipolar NPN transistors, but other transistor types (e.g., BJT PNP, FETs) can be used, as will be apparent in light of this disclosure.
  • mixer circuitry configured in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention can be implemented, for example, with discrete componentry (e.g. printed circuited board or card populated with discrete components) or as one or more integrated circuits (e.g., system-on-chip, or chip set formed using any number of suitable semiconductor processes).
  • Silicon Germanium (SiGe) processes are used, such as IBM processes 5 HP, 7 HP or 8 HP.
  • Indium Phosphide, regular Silicon, Indium Gallium Phosphide, Gallium Arsenide are all viable processes generally available that can be used to implement an embodiment of the present invention.
  • the transistors Q 1 -Q 8 in one such example case are bipolar NPN transistors implemented using standard Silicon Germanium (SiGe) semiconductor processes.
  • the impedances Z 1 -Z 10 can be implemented, for instance, as thin film resistors. A number of variations on the mixer circuit can be implemented.
  • FIG. 3 a One such variation is shown in FIG. 3 a .
  • impedance Z 8 is implemented with a diode (e.g., SiGe) as shown in FIG. 3 a .
  • the various components can be implemented using standard SiGe semiconductor processes, although other embodiments can be implemented using discrete components if so desired.
  • the emitter voltage of transistors Q 7 and Q 8 is effectively raised by diode D 1 (e.g., by 0.4 to 0.9 VDC, depending on the diode junction type). As such, all of the bias voltages are shifted upward in the transimpedance input stage. This allows more room for voltage swing at the emitters of transistors Q 5 and Q 6 , effectively increasing the dynamic range of the mixer circuit. Note, however, that this increased dynamic range comes at the expense of increased power consumption.
  • FIG. 3 b Another variation is shown in FIG. 3 b .
  • impedances Z 7 -Z 9 are replaced with degenerated current sources Q 9 -Q 11 (including the corresponding resistors R 1 -R 3 ), which are biased from a voltage reference Vref.
  • the various components can be implemented using, for example, standard semiconductor processes, although other embodiments can be implemented using discrete components if so desired.
  • Vref can be generated, for example, on chip or by another circuit. In any case, this configuration enables the transimpedance input stage to better reject common mode input signals applied to In p and In n . Again, additional power supply headroom is needed, and thus more power is required. So consideration of the various trades should be made.
  • Transistors Q 9 -Q 11 can be, for example, MOSFET devices without negatively impacting circuit performance. In one such example case, MOSFET devices are provided using the IBM® 8 HP SiGe BiCMOS process, although any number of suitable semiconductor processes can be used.

Abstract

A Gilbert cell mixer design is disclosed. Instead of using a differential transconductance stage as typically done, the design employs a differential transimpedance amplifier input stage. By utilizing a transimpedance input stage to the Gilbert mixer, feedback is used to obtain higher linearity without sacrificing noise performance. The transimpedance input stage supplies a current signal to the cascode connected Gilbert switching quad, so the transimpedance amplifier output is taken from the collector of the transimpedance amplifier output transistor, instead of the emitter as normally done with transimpedance amplifiers.

Description

    STATEMENT OF GOVERNMENT INTEREST
  • The invention was made with United States Government support under contract DAAB07-02-C-K513 awarded by the Army, and the United States Government may have certain rights in this invention.
  • FIELD OF THE INVENTION
  • The invention relates to mixer circuits, and more particularly, to Gilbert cell mixers.
  • BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
  • A so-called Gilbert cell or four-quadrant multiplier is a cross-coupled differential amplifier having a gain that can be linearly controlled by modulating emitter bias current. The amplitude of the differential input RF signal can be linearly controlled by a differential AC voltage. Gilbert cells are commonly used in a number of applications, including mixers, automatic gain control (AGC) amplifiers, amplitude and sideband modulators, amplitude modulation (AM) and sideband detectors, frequency doublers and dividers, squaring and square-root circuits.
  • The typical implementation of a Gilbert cell mixer utilizes a simple differential pair as the input transconductance stage. This is cascode connected with the Gilbert switching quad, which is typically driven by a local oscillator signal. Such mixer designs suffer from a number of problems, including poor linearity of the transconductance differential amplifier input stage. Conventional techniques such as emitter degeneration can be utilized to improve linearity, but this has a direct, negative impact on noise performance of Gilbert cell mixers.
  • There is a need, therefore, for improved Gilbert cell mixer designs.
  • SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
  • One embodiment of the present invention provides a device for mixing signals. The device includes a Gilbert mixer stage having a cascode connected switching quad, and a differential transimpedance amplifier input stage operatively coupled to the Gilbert mixer stage. The differential transimpedance amplifier input stage is for generating a current signal that is applied to the cascode connected switching quad of the Gilbert mixer stage. In one example case, the differential transimpedance amplifier has an output transistor, and the current signal is taken from a collector of the output transistor. In another example case, the differential transimpedance amplifier has closed loop negative feedback taken from an emitter of an output transistor. In another example case, the differential transimpedance amplifier comprises an input transistor and an output transistor. An input signal is applied to a base of the input transistor, and an impedance at a collector of the input transistor produces open-loop voltage gain, and amplified signals on the collector of input transistor are applied to a base of the output transistor. In one such case, the current signal is taken from a collector of the output transistor. In another such case, the input transistor is connected in a common emitter configuration. In another such case, emitter voltage of the input transistor is raised by a diode. In some cases, the differential transimpedance amplifier can be configured with degenerated current sources for facilitating rejection of common mode input signals. In another specific configuration, the device may be included, for example, in a system-on-chip (e.g., for integrated applications that require signal mixing), or may be implemented with discrete components. Any number of variations will be apparent in light of this disclosure.
  • For instance, another embodiment of the present invention provides a device for mixing signals that includes a Gilbert mixer stage having a cascode connected switching quad, and a differential transimpedance amplifier input stage operatively coupled to the Gilbert mixer stage, for generating a current signal that is applied to the cascode connected switching quad of the Gilbert mixer stage. In this example configuration, the differential transimpedance amplifier has an output transistor, and the current signal is taken from a collector of the output transistor, and the differential transimpedance amplifier has closed loop negative feedback taken from an emitter of the output transistor. The differential transimpedance amplifier may further comprise an input transistor, wherein an input signal is applied to a base of the input transistor and an impedance at a collector of the input transistor produces open-loop voltage gain, and amplified signals on the collector of input transistor are applied to a base of the output transistor. In one such case, the input transistor is connected in a common emitter configuration. In another such case, emitter voltage of the input transistor is raised by a diode. The differential transimpedance amplifier may be configured with degenerated current sources for facilitating rejection of common mode input signals. The device may be included, for example, in a system-on-chip, or may be implemented with discrete components.
  • Another embodiment provides a device for mixing signals that includes a Gilbert mixer stage having a cascode connected switching quad, and a differential transimpedance amplifier input stage operatively coupled to the Gilbert mixer stage for generating a current signal that is applied to the cascode connected switching quad of the Gilbert mixer stage. In this example configuration, the differential transimpedance amplifier comprises an input transistor and an output transistor, and an input signal is applied to a base of the input transistor and amplified signals on the collector of input transistor are applied to a base of the output transistor. In addition, the current signal is taken from a collector of the output transistor, and the differential transimpedance amplifier has closed loop negative feedback taken from an emitter of the output transistor. In one such case, the input transistor is connected in a common emitter configuration. In another such case, emitter voltage of the input transistor is raised by a diode. The differential transimpedance amplifier may be configured with degenerated current sources for facilitating rejection of common mode input signals. The device may be included, for example, in a system-on-chip, or may be implemented with discrete components.
  • The features and advantages described herein are not all-inclusive and, in particular, many additional features and advantages will be apparent to one of ordinary skill in the art in view of the drawings, specification, and claims. Moreover, it should be noted that the language used in the specification has been principally selected for readability and instructional purposes, and not to limit the scope of the inventive subject matter.
  • BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
  • FIG. 1 illustrates a conventional Gilbert cell mixer design.
  • FIG. 2 illustrates a transimpedance amplifier based Gilbert cell mixer, in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.
  • FIG. 3 a illustrates a transimpedance amplifier based Gilbert cell mixer, in accordance with another embodiment of the present invention.
  • FIG. 3 b illustrates a transimpedance amplifier based Gilbert cell mixer, in accordance with another embodiment of the present invention.
  • DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
  • A Gilbert cell mixer design is disclosed. Instead of using a differential transconductance stage as typically done, the design employs a differential transimpedance amplifier input stage. By utilizing a transimpedance input stage to the Gilbert mixer, feedback is used to obtain higher linearity without sacrificing noise performance. The transimpedance input stage supplies a current signal to the cascode connected Gilbert switching quad, so the transimpedance amplifier output is taken from the collector of the transimpedance amplifier output transistor, instead of the emitter as typically done with transimpedance amplifiers.
  • General Overview
  • As previously explained, a typical Gilbert cell mixer utilizes a transconductance input stage, as illustrated by the circuit of FIG. 1. As can be seen, the circuit includes a differential transconductance amplifier stage (RF input stage) operatively coupled to a Gilbert cell (mixing stage). The power supplies of Vcc and Vee are provided as typically done.
  • In such a typical Gilbert cell mixer, the RF input stage to the mixer has a differential transconductance pair of transistors, Q5 and Q6. This transistor pair converts an applied input voltage at the bases to an output current at the collectors. The differential input voltage is designated as Inp and Inn, and the differential output current is designated as Ip and In. The differential output current Ip and In is then mixed with the local oscillator signal (LOp and LOn) applied to the Gilbert switching quad, which is made up of Q1-Q4. The differential output signal of the mixer stage (Outp and Outn) is taken at the collectors of the Gilbert quad.
  • While this conventional approach is efficient in terms of relatively few components used, it has shortcomings. For instance, Q5 and Q6 utilize no feedback. Linearity is dependent on the semiconductor process used and how much emitter degeneration is used, which is impedance element Z5. When impedance Z5 is a resistive element for broadband applications, high linearity can be achieved at the expense of low mixer circuit gain and high noise figure. Narrow band applications can partially mitigate this shortcoming by utilizing reactive components (i.e., inductors or capacitors) for Z5. However, there are still limits in how linear the differential transconductance amplifier can be made. The other impedances Z1-Z4 are generally used for shaping the circuitry frequency response and gain. Typical impedance values are as follows: Z1=Z2=100 ohms; Z3=Z4=70 ohms; and Z5=45 ohms.
  • In accordance with an embodiment of the present invention, the differential transconductance amplifier input stage is replaced with a transimpedance amplifier circuit utilizing negative feedback. This technique provides several improvements in performance over the open-loop input stage, including higher linearity without sacrificing noise performance.
  • Mixer Circuit
  • FIG. 2 illustrates a Gilbert cell mixer configured with a differential transimpedance amplifier input stage, in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention.
  • As can be seen, the circuit is implemented with transistors Q1-Q8 and impedances Z1-Z10. The present invention is not intended to be limited to a particular type of transistors or impedances. Rather, the mixer circuit topology shown in FIG. 2 can be implemented using any number of suitable transistor and impedance types. For example, the transistors Q1-Q8 can be implemented with CMOS FETs or Bipolar Junction Transistors, or any other suitable transistor technology. Likewise, the impedances can be, for instance, resistive, capacitive, inductive, or a combination thereof. The Gilbert cell (mixer stage) can be implemented as typically done.
  • As can further be seen, the transimpedance amplifier is a differential circuit and has symmetrical qualities, thereby allowing analysis of one circuit half to be equally applied to the other circuit half. For instance, this example embodiment can be discussed in terms of the left circuit half, which generally includes transistors Q5 and Q7 and impedances Z3, Z5, Z7, Z8, and Z10. The discussion of this left circuit half will equally apply the right circuit half, which generally includes transistors Q6 and Q8 and impedances Z4, Z6, Z9, Z8, and Z10.
  • In operation, transistors Q7 and Q5 form a transimpedance input amplifier. The RF input signal (Inp) is applied to the base of transistor Q7. A large collector impedance Z3 produces large open-loop voltage gain at transistor Q7. In some embodiments, transistor Q7 is connected in a common emitter configuration (where impedance Z8 is a short to ground). The amplified signal on the collector of transistor Q7 is then applied to the base of transistor Q5, which serves two functions. In particular, transistor Q5 buffers the signal from the collector of transistor Q7 to drive the feedback resistance. In addition, transistor Q5 generates a current output (Ip) at the collector which is applied to the Gilbert switching quad, at the emitters of the Q1-Q2 transistor pair. In typical differential transimpedance amplifier circuits, the output would be taken from the emitter of transistor Q5 as a voltage signal, with transistor Q5 configured in a common collector configuration. This embodiment, however, has adapted the differential transimpedance amplifier circuit into a new configuration, where the feedback is still tapped off the emitter of transistor Q5, but the output is taken as a current signal (Ip) from the collector of transistor Q5. The Gilbert switching quad (more specifically, transistors Q1 and Q2 of the quad) uses the current signal IP in normal fashion.
  • Given the symmetry associated with a differential circuit, and as previously explained, everything stated for transistors Q7 and Q5 can be applied to transistors Q8 and Q6, respectively. For purposes of clarity, however, a detailed discussion is now provided. In operation, transistors Q8 and Q6 form a transimpedance input amplifier. The RF input signal (Inn) is applied to the base of transistor Q8. A large collector impedance Z4 produces large open-loop voltage gain at transistor Q8. In some embodiments, transistor Q8 is connected in a common emitter configuration (where impedance Z8 is a short to ground). The amplified signal on the collector of transistor Q8 is then applied to the base of transistor Q6, which serves two functions. In particular, transistor Q6 buffers the signal from the collector of transistor Q8 to drive the feedback resistance. In addition, transistor Q6 generates a current output (In) at the collector which is applied to the Gilbert switching quad, at the emitters of the Q3-Q4 transistor pair. As previously explained, the output of a typical differential transimpedance amplifier circuit would be taken from the emitter of transistor Q6 as a voltage signal, with transistor Q6 configured in a common collector configuration. This embodiment, however, has adapted the differential transimpedance amplifier circuit, where the feedback is still tapped off the emitter of transistor Q6, but the output is taken as a current signal (In) from the collector of transistor Q6. The Gilbert quad (more specifically, transistors Q3 and Q4 of the quad) uses the current signal In in normal fashion.
  • The differential transimpedance amplifier based approach has advantages over a conventional transconductance approach in the following ways. The closed loop feedback can greatly improve the linearity of the mixer circuit, without sacrificing gain or noise figure. This can be done with resistive elements to maintain a broad band response. In the traditional transconductance approach, improved linearity is achieved by increasing the degeneration impedance, Z5 in FIG. 1. However, and as previously explained, this reduces the gain and increases the noise figure significantly, especially if resistive degeneration is used in a broad band application. In contrast, a mixer configured with a differential transimpedance amplifier input stage as described herein decouples linearity and gain. As such, high gain and low noise figure can be achieved simultaneously with high linearity. Most of the linearizing benefits achieved with negative feedback taken from the emitter of transistor Q5 are present in the current-mode signal taken from the collector of Q5. Likewise, most of the linearizing benefits achieved with negative feedback taken from the emitter of transistor Q6 are present in the current-mode signal taken from the collector of Q6. In this sense, taking the output from the transimpedance amplifier circuit from the collectors of Q5 and/or Q6 is beneficial.
  • Impedance elements Z8 and Z10 generally enable the mixer circuit to behave in a differential way. The Inn input can be left open or terminated while the Inp input is driven with a signal, or vise-versa. Differential behavior partially reconstructs an inverted copy of the applied RF input signal in the non-drive half of the input stage. Impedance Z8 can be, for example, any passive device or combination of such devices, one or more diode drops, an active current source, or shorted directly to ground. Impedances Z7, Z9, and Z10 effectively shape the frequency response and gain of mixer circuit, and can be implemented, for instance, with one or more passive devices (e.g., resistors, capacitors, inductors, or combination thereof). Alternatively, or in addition to, impedances Z7, Z9, and Z10 can be implemented as one or more diode drops or an active current source, as discussed with reference to FIGS. 3 a-b.
  • In some embodiments, the RF input (Inp and Inn) can be applied to the transimpedance input stage through an impedance network. This impedance can be tailored to meet the overall circuit gain and input matching requirements. For instance, the mixer circuit gain for the RF input Inp is generally proportional to Z1/Z5∥Z7∥(Z10/2), where ∥ represents parallel combination of networks. Similarly, given differential circuit symmetries, the mixer circuit gain for the RF input Inn is generally proportional to Z2/Z6∥Z9∥(Z10/2).
  • The transistors shown in this example of FIG. 2 are bipolar NPN transistors, but other transistor types (e.g., BJT PNP, FETs) can be used, as will be apparent in light of this disclosure. Moreover, mixer circuitry configured in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention can be implemented, for example, with discrete componentry (e.g. printed circuited board or card populated with discrete components) or as one or more integrated circuits (e.g., system-on-chip, or chip set formed using any number of suitable semiconductor processes). In one example case, Silicon Germanium (SiGe) processes are used, such as IBM processes 5 HP, 7 HP or 8 HP. Indium Phosphide, regular Silicon, Indium Gallium Phosphide, Gallium Arsenide are all viable processes generally available that can be used to implement an embodiment of the present invention.
  • Example impedance values in accordance with one specific embodiment are as follows: Z1=Z2=100 ohms; Z3=Z4=450 ohms; Z5=Z6=60 ohms; Z7=Z9=70 ohms; Z8=0 ohms (short circuit); and Z10=45 ohms. The transistors Q1-Q8 in one such example case are bipolar NPN transistors implemented using standard Silicon Germanium (SiGe) semiconductor processes. The impedances Z1-Z10 can be implemented, for instance, as thin film resistors. A number of variations on the mixer circuit can be implemented.
  • Dynamic Range Increase
  • One such variation is shown in FIG. 3 a. In this example embodiment, the circuit is mostly configured as shown in FIG. 2, and can have the following example impedance values in: Z1=Z2=100 ohms; Z3=Z4=450 ohms; Z5=Z6=68 ohms; Z7=Z9=70 ohms; and Z10=180 ohms. Instead of a short circuit, however, impedance Z8 is implemented with a diode (e.g., SiGe) as shown in FIG. 3 a. Just as previously explained with reference to FIG. 2, the various components can be implemented using standard SiGe semiconductor processes, although other embodiments can be implemented using discrete components if so desired.
  • In any case, in this specific embodiment shown in FIG. 3 a, the emitter voltage of transistors Q7 and Q8 is effectively raised by diode D1 (e.g., by 0.4 to 0.9 VDC, depending on the diode junction type). As such, all of the bias voltages are shifted upward in the transimpedance input stage. This allows more room for voltage swing at the emitters of transistors Q5 and Q6, effectively increasing the dynamic range of the mixer circuit. Note, however, that this increased dynamic range comes at the expense of increased power consumption.
  • Common Mode Rejection
  • Another variation is shown in FIG. 3 b. In this example embodiment, the circuit is mostly configured as shown in FIG. 2, and can have the following example impedance values in: Z1=Z2=100 ohms; Z3=Z4=450 ohms; Z5=Z6=68 ohms; and Z10=180 ohms. As shown in FIG. 3 b, however, impedances Z7-Z9 are replaced with degenerated current sources Q9-Q11 (including the corresponding resistors R1-R3), which are biased from a voltage reference Vref. Just as previously explained with reference to FIGS. 2 and 3 a, the various components can be implemented using, for example, standard semiconductor processes, although other embodiments can be implemented using discrete components if so desired.
  • Vref can be generated, for example, on chip or by another circuit. In any case, this configuration enables the transimpedance input stage to better reject common mode input signals applied to Inp and Inn. Again, additional power supply headroom is needed, and thus more power is required. So consideration of the various trades should be made. Transistors Q9-Q11 can be, for example, MOSFET devices without negatively impacting circuit performance. In one such example case, MOSFET devices are provided using the IBM® 8 HP SiGe BiCMOS process, although any number of suitable semiconductor processes can be used.
  • The foregoing description of the embodiments of the invention has been presented for the purposes of illustration and description. It is not intended to be exhaustive or to limit the invention to the precise form disclosed. Many modifications and variations are possible in light of this disclosure. It is intended that the scope of the invention be limited not by this detailed description, but rather by the claims appended hereto.

Claims (20)

1. A device for mixing signals, comprising:
a Gilbert mixer stage having a cascode connected switching quad; and
a differential transimpedance amplifier input stage operatively coupled to the Gilbert mixer stage, and for generating a current signal that is applied to the cascode connected switching quad of the Gilbert mixer stage, the differential transimpedance amplifier configured with a pair of input transistors for receiving an input signal and a pair of output transistors for outputting the current signal, wherein the output transistors are directly coupled to each other by an impedance.
2. The device of claim 1 wherein the current signal is provided at collectors of the output transistors, and the impedance directly couples emitters of the output transistors.
3. The device of claim 1 wherein the differential transimpedance amplifier has closed loop negative feedback taken from an emitter of an output transistor.
4. The device of claim 1 wherein the input signal is applied to bases of the input transistors, and amplified signals on collectors of the input transistors are applied to corresponding bases of the output transistors.
5. The device of claim 4 wherein the current signal is provided at collectors of the output transistors, and the impedance directly couples emitters of the output transistors.
6. The device of claim 4 wherein the input transistors are connected in a common emitter configuration.
7. The device of claim 4 wherein emitter voltage of the input transistors is raised by a diode.
8. The device of claim 1 wherein the differential transimpedance amplifier is further configured with one or more degenerated current sources for facilitating rejection of common mode input signals.
9. The device of claim 8 wherein the device is included in a system-on-chip and the one or more degenerated current sources are biased from a voltage reference generated on-chip.
10. A device for mixing signals, comprising:
a Gilbert mixer stage having a cascode connected switching quad; and
a differential transimpedance amplifier input stage operatively coupled to the Gilbert mixer stage, and for generating a current signal that is applied to the cascode connected switching quad of the Gilbert mixer stage, wherein the differential transimpedance amplifier is configured with a pair of input transistors for receiving an input signal and a pair of output transistors for outputting the current signal, wherein emitters of the output transistors are directly coupled to each other by an impedance, and the current signal is provided at collectors of the output transistors, and the differential transimpedance amplifier has closed loop negative feedback taken from the emitters of the output transistors.
11. The device of claim 10 wherein the input signal is applied to bases of the input transistors, and amplified signals on collectors of the input transistors are applied to bases of the output transistors.
12. The device of claim 11 wherein the input transistors are connected in a common emitter configuration.
13. The device of claim 11 wherein emitter voltage of the input transistors is raised by a diode.
14. The device of claim 10 wherein the differential transimpedance amplifier is further configured with one or more degenerated active current sources for facilitating rejection of common mode input signals, the one or more degenerated active current sources biased from a voltage reference.
15. The device of claim 10 wherein the device is included in a system-on-chip.
16. A device for mixing signals, comprising:
a Gilbert mixer stage having a cascode connected switching quad; and
a differential transimpedance amplifier input stage operatively coupled to the Gilbert mixer stage, and for generating a current signal that is applied to the cascode connected switching quad of the Gilbert mixer stage, wherein the differential transimpedance amplifier comprises a pair of input transistors for receiving an input signal and a pair of output transistors for outputting the current signal, wherein emitters of the output transistors are directly coupled to each other by an impedance, and the input signal is applied to bases of the input transistors and amplified signals on collectors of the input transistors are applied to base of the output transistors, and the current signal is provided at collectors of the output transistors, and the differential transimpedance amplifier has closed loop negative feedback taken from emitters of the output transistors.
17. The device of claim 16 wherein the input transistors are connected in a common emitter configuration.
18. The device of claim 16 wherein emitter voltage of the input transistors is raised by a diode.
19. The device of claim 16 wherein the differential transimpedance amplifier is further configured with one or more degenerated active current sources for facilitating rejection of common mode input signals, the one or more degenerated active current sources biased from a voltage reference.
20. The device of claim 16 wherein the device is included in a system-on-chip.
US12/492,682 2009-06-26 2009-06-26 Transimpedance amplifier input stage mixer Expired - Fee Related US8089309B2 (en)

Priority Applications (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US12/492,682 US8089309B2 (en) 2009-06-26 2009-06-26 Transimpedance amplifier input stage mixer
PCT/US2010/038746 WO2010151460A1 (en) 2009-06-26 2010-06-16 Transimpedance amplifier input stage mixer

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US12/492,682 US8089309B2 (en) 2009-06-26 2009-06-26 Transimpedance amplifier input stage mixer

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
US20100327941A1 true US20100327941A1 (en) 2010-12-30
US8089309B2 US8089309B2 (en) 2012-01-03

Family

ID=43380008

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US12/492,682 Expired - Fee Related US8089309B2 (en) 2009-06-26 2009-06-26 Transimpedance amplifier input stage mixer

Country Status (2)

Country Link
US (1) US8089309B2 (en)
WO (1) WO2010151460A1 (en)

Cited By (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20120019304A1 (en) * 2010-07-22 2012-01-26 Mstar Semiconductor, Inc. Mixer for Canceling Second-Order Inter-Modulation Distortion and Associated Transconductor Circuit
GR20110100601A (en) * 2011-10-19 2013-05-17 Ceragon Networks Ελλας Συστηματα Τηλεπικοινωνιων Α.Ε., Signal power detector with adjustable gain
US20140043087A1 (en) * 2012-08-08 2014-02-13 Lsi Corporation High accuracy bipolar current multiplier with base current compensation

Families Citing this family (13)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US8174318B2 (en) * 2010-01-28 2012-05-08 Analog Devices, Inc. Apparatus and method for providing linear transconductance amplification
JP4991915B2 (en) * 2010-07-05 2012-08-08 株式会社東芝 Frequency conversion circuit, signal processing circuit, and receiver
US8838058B2 (en) 2011-05-09 2014-09-16 Bae Systems Information And Electronic Systems Integration Inc. Extending the upper frequency limit of a communications radio
CN102412786B (en) * 2011-12-20 2014-06-11 东南大学 Transconductance-enhancing passive frequency mixer
US9444418B1 (en) * 2013-03-15 2016-09-13 Rockwell Collins, Inc. Frequency enhanced active transistor
US10082488B2 (en) 2015-12-02 2018-09-25 Butterfly Network, Inc. Time gain compensation circuit and related apparatus and methods
US9492144B1 (en) 2015-12-02 2016-11-15 Butterfly Network, Inc. Multi-level pulser and related apparatus and methods
US10187020B2 (en) 2015-12-02 2019-01-22 Butterfly Network, Inc. Trans-impedance amplifier for ultrasound device and related apparatus and methods
US10250189B1 (en) * 2018-08-24 2019-04-02 Realtek Semiconductor Corp. Single sideband mixer and method thereof
TW202034624A (en) * 2018-11-09 2020-09-16 美商蝴蝶網路公司 Trans-impedance amplifier (tia) for ultrasound devices
US11405003B1 (en) 2020-08-26 2022-08-02 Bae Systems Information And Electronic Systems Integration Inc. Extended feedback gain tuning in TIA based current amplifier or mixer
CN112039452B (en) * 2020-09-07 2022-08-23 电子科技大学 Broadband trans-impedance amplifier
US11595069B2 (en) 2021-07-14 2023-02-28 Apple Inc. Transimpedance amplifier (TIA) with tunable input resistance

Citations (9)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4931746A (en) * 1988-05-11 1990-06-05 Licentia Patent-Verwaltungs-Gmbh Controllable broadband amplifier and mixer which includes the amplifier
US6594504B1 (en) * 1999-09-03 2003-07-15 Stmicroelectronics S.A. Frequency transposition device having low local oscillator signal leakage and corresponding leakage reduction process
US7054609B2 (en) * 2002-04-04 2006-05-30 Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson (Publ) Linearity improvement of Gilbert mixers
US7062247B2 (en) * 2002-05-15 2006-06-13 Nec Corporation Active double-balanced mixer
US7088980B2 (en) * 2001-06-29 2006-08-08 Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba Frequency converter with nonlinear distortion cancellation
US7382191B2 (en) * 2006-02-17 2008-06-03 Sipex Corporation Multiplier-transimpedance amplifier combination with input common mode feedback
US7417486B2 (en) * 2004-09-28 2008-08-26 Sharp Kabushiki Kaisha Voltage-current conversion circuit, amplifier, mixer circuit, and mobile appliance using the circuit
US7446590B2 (en) * 2006-09-13 2008-11-04 Mediatek Inc. Low noise mixer with reduced distortion
US7626777B2 (en) * 2005-09-23 2009-12-01 Agere Systems Inc. Variable threshold bipolar signal peak detector

Patent Citations (9)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4931746A (en) * 1988-05-11 1990-06-05 Licentia Patent-Verwaltungs-Gmbh Controllable broadband amplifier and mixer which includes the amplifier
US6594504B1 (en) * 1999-09-03 2003-07-15 Stmicroelectronics S.A. Frequency transposition device having low local oscillator signal leakage and corresponding leakage reduction process
US7088980B2 (en) * 2001-06-29 2006-08-08 Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba Frequency converter with nonlinear distortion cancellation
US7054609B2 (en) * 2002-04-04 2006-05-30 Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson (Publ) Linearity improvement of Gilbert mixers
US7062247B2 (en) * 2002-05-15 2006-06-13 Nec Corporation Active double-balanced mixer
US7417486B2 (en) * 2004-09-28 2008-08-26 Sharp Kabushiki Kaisha Voltage-current conversion circuit, amplifier, mixer circuit, and mobile appliance using the circuit
US7626777B2 (en) * 2005-09-23 2009-12-01 Agere Systems Inc. Variable threshold bipolar signal peak detector
US7382191B2 (en) * 2006-02-17 2008-06-03 Sipex Corporation Multiplier-transimpedance amplifier combination with input common mode feedback
US7446590B2 (en) * 2006-09-13 2008-11-04 Mediatek Inc. Low noise mixer with reduced distortion

Cited By (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20120019304A1 (en) * 2010-07-22 2012-01-26 Mstar Semiconductor, Inc. Mixer for Canceling Second-Order Inter-Modulation Distortion and Associated Transconductor Circuit
US8330522B2 (en) * 2010-07-22 2012-12-11 Mstar Semiconductor, Inc. Mixer for canceling second-order inter-modulation distortion and associated transconductor circuit
GR20110100601A (en) * 2011-10-19 2013-05-17 Ceragon Networks Ελλας Συστηματα Τηλεπικοινωνιων Α.Ε., Signal power detector with adjustable gain
US20140043087A1 (en) * 2012-08-08 2014-02-13 Lsi Corporation High accuracy bipolar current multiplier with base current compensation

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
WO2010151460A1 (en) 2010-12-29
US8089309B2 (en) 2012-01-03

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US8089309B2 (en) Transimpedance amplifier input stage mixer
KR101101575B1 (en) Systems and methods for self-mixing adaptive bias circuit for power amplifier
US20080064359A1 (en) Amplifier, filter using the same, and radio communication device
US5774019A (en) Low distortion differential amplifier circuit
US7161406B1 (en) Method and apparatus for providing non 2:1 Gilbert cell mixer
US7877065B2 (en) Signal processing circuit and communication device using the same
EP1704649B1 (en) Versatile baseband signal input current splitter
US8232831B2 (en) Multiple input/gain stage Gilbert cell mixers
US7027792B1 (en) Topology for a single ended input dual balanced mixer
US6657494B2 (en) Variable gain mixer-amplifier with fixed DC operating voltage level
JPH07235840A (en) Variable gain amplifier circuit
US20010048336A1 (en) Analog multiplying circuit and variable gain amplifying circuit
US6642787B1 (en) Differential amplifier with two long-tailed pairs of transistors
US6344762B1 (en) Bias circuit for a low voltage differential circuit
US20050007198A1 (en) Power amplifier module
US6345178B1 (en) Linear balanced RF mixer
IL118632A (en) Output stage of operational amplifier
EP1430598B1 (en) Dynamic biasing of a transmitter
TWI753758B (en) Current mirror arrangements
US7002412B2 (en) Transconductance circuit
US9641127B1 (en) Operational transconductance amplifier of improved linearity
US6538501B2 (en) Radio frequency amplifier and tuner
US20060040623A1 (en) Amplitude modulator, in particular for mobile radio, and a method for modulation of a signal
JP2005064766A (en) Variable gain amplifier
US7668526B2 (en) Frequency mixer using current feedback amplifiers

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AS Assignment

Owner name: BAE SYSTEMS INFORMATION AND ELECTRONIC SYSTEMS INT

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:JANSEN, DOUGLAS S.;FLEWELLING, GREGORY M.;REEL/FRAME:022932/0763

Effective date: 20090702

STCF Information on status: patent grant

Free format text: PATENTED CASE

AS Assignment

Owner name: THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AS REPRESENTED BY THE

Free format text: CONFIRMATORY LICENSE;ASSIGNOR:BAE SYSTEMS, INC.;REEL/FRAME:027746/0781

Effective date: 20090713

FPAY Fee payment

Year of fee payment: 4

FEPP Fee payment procedure

Free format text: MAINTENANCE FEE REMINDER MAILED (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: REM.); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITY

LAPS Lapse for failure to pay maintenance fees

Free format text: PATENT EXPIRED FOR FAILURE TO PAY MAINTENANCE FEES (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: EXP.); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITY

STCH Information on status: patent discontinuation

Free format text: PATENT EXPIRED DUE TO NONPAYMENT OF MAINTENANCE FEES UNDER 37 CFR 1.362

FP Lapsed due to failure to pay maintenance fee

Effective date: 20200103