US20110089225A1 - Low Turbulence Argon Purging System - Google Patents

Low Turbulence Argon Purging System Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US20110089225A1
US20110089225A1 US12/903,502 US90350210A US2011089225A1 US 20110089225 A1 US20110089225 A1 US 20110089225A1 US 90350210 A US90350210 A US 90350210A US 2011089225 A1 US2011089225 A1 US 2011089225A1
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
chamber
gas
atmospheric air
weld
purge
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Abandoned
Application number
US12/903,502
Inventor
Lee Patrick
David Brayshaw
Scott Wittkop
James Barrett
Ting-Kwo Lei
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
PCC Structurals Inc
Original Assignee
PCC Structurals Inc
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by PCC Structurals Inc filed Critical PCC Structurals Inc
Priority to US12/903,502 priority Critical patent/US20110089225A1/en
Assigned to PCC STRUCTURALS INC. reassignment PCC STRUCTURALS INC. ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: LEI, TING-KWO, BARRETT, JAMES, WITTKOP, SCOTT, BRAYSHAW, DAVID, PATRICK, LEE
Priority to CA2777423A priority patent/CA2777423C/en
Priority to EP10824083.9A priority patent/EP2488323A4/en
Priority to PCT/US2010/052641 priority patent/WO2011047138A2/en
Publication of US20110089225A1 publication Critical patent/US20110089225A1/en
Priority to US13/452,969 priority patent/US9566659B2/en
Abandoned legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B23MACHINE TOOLS; METAL-WORKING NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • B23KSOLDERING OR UNSOLDERING; WELDING; CLADDING OR PLATING BY SOLDERING OR WELDING; CUTTING BY APPLYING HEAT LOCALLY, e.g. FLAME CUTTING; WORKING BY LASER BEAM
    • B23K9/00Arc welding or cutting
    • B23K9/32Accessories
    • B23K9/325Devices for supplying or evacuating shielding gas
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B23MACHINE TOOLS; METAL-WORKING NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • B23KSOLDERING OR UNSOLDERING; WELDING; CLADDING OR PLATING BY SOLDERING OR WELDING; CUTTING BY APPLYING HEAT LOCALLY, e.g. FLAME CUTTING; WORKING BY LASER BEAM
    • B23K26/00Working by laser beam, e.g. welding, cutting or boring
    • B23K26/12Working by laser beam, e.g. welding, cutting or boring in a special atmosphere, e.g. in an enclosure
    • B23K26/123Working by laser beam, e.g. welding, cutting or boring in a special atmosphere, e.g. in an enclosure in an atmosphere of particular gases

Definitions

  • the present invention relates generally to apparatus and methods for purging atmospheric air from an enclosed chamber, such as a welding chamber, and replacing the air with an inert gas.
  • the current methodology used to obtain an acceptable inert atmosphere in a chamber or enclosed work area for processes such as welding, an atmosphere with extremely low oxygen, ⁇ 60 ppm O2 and moisture levels, > ⁇ 40° F. is obtained as follows.
  • the standard method to purge a non-interlock chamber is to pipe argon into the chamber at a high rate of flow, the argon mixing with the air already in the chamber, which causes both high purity argon and air to be exhausted from the chamber to atmosphere until an acceptable work environment is obtained.
  • This current production method used to purge large non-interlock welding chambers typically takes a minimum of 8-9 volume changes of argon and 30 plus minutes to obtain an acceptable welding environment. This process wastes large quantities of argon and time (decreases throughput and creates a large amount of idle time).
  • the present invention solves the problems heretofore encountered in purging-enclosed chambers by providing a system which greatly reduces the time and gas required to purge atmospheric air from the chamber and replace it with another gas, such as argon.
  • the present invention accomplishes this desired result by introducing the replacement/purge gas into the enclosed chamber using a low turbulence, high flow purge system that produces a laminar flow front which displaces the atmospheric air in the chamber with very little mixing of the air and replacement/purge gas, such as argon.
  • the argon remains below the atmospheric air in the chamber due to the higher density of argon relative to air and pushes the air from the chamber through exhaust means at the top of the chamber.
  • the system of the present invention includes an enclosed chamber, a perforated plate having a plurality of through holes positioned within the chamber, a purge support plate positioned in a spaced relationship beneath the perforated plate and manifold means communicating with a plurality of spaced-apart diffusers mounted on the purge support plate.
  • An inert gas source such as argon, communicates with the manifold means.
  • the inert gas passes through the diffusers and enters the space between the purge support plate and the perforated plate to subsequently pass through the spaced-apart holes and enter the chamber in a laminar flow front to purge the atmospheric air from the chamber.
  • the chamber includes controlled vent means to permit the egress of the purged air and inert gas therefrom.
  • FIG. 1 is a fragmented, isometric, exploded view of the invention in a weld chamber
  • FIG. 2 is a perspective view of the purge/support plate of the invention
  • FIG. 3 is a perspective view of a portion of the perforated table top/work platform plate of the invention.
  • FIG. 4 is an elevation view of a welding chamber in which the purge system of the invention is used
  • FIG. 5 is a perspective view of the piping manifold on the underside of the purge plate of FIG. 2 ;
  • FIG. 6 is a perspective view of the purge/support plate of FIG. 2 viewed from another angle showing a spaced-apart array of gas diffusers and support members mounted on the upper side of the purge plate;
  • FIG. 7(A) is a plan view of the work table with the purge plate and perforated work support plate of the invention depicted therein;
  • FIG. 7(B) is a front elevation view of the work table with the purge plate and perforated work support plate of the invention depicted therein;
  • FIG. 7(C) is a plan view of the perforated work support plate.
  • the present invention not only recognizes the density difference between argon and air but also relies on the inert gas distribution system to provide a non-turbulent, laminar flow front of inert gas.
  • This system is designed to provide for multiple inlets which rapidly distribute a large volume of inert gas such as argon at a low pressure across the entire chamber floor. This is accomplished by controlling pipe size and the addition of flow restriction diffuser devices to equalize the flow of all supply outlets. Also, the exhaust outlet must be sized to accommodate a high flow with minimal back pressure.
  • This system can also be accompanied with a perforated plate system which protects piping outlets/flow restriction device, increases uniformity of gas flow, and also provides a stable working platform to support the workpiece to be welded, for example.
  • a presently preferred embodiment of the invention depicted in the drawings is directed to a welding chamber 2 , but it will be understood that the invention is useful for other types of chambers where an inert atmosphere is required for work to be performed.
  • the welding chamber 2 is a housing which encloses an airtight interior space 12 within which the welding operation is to be performed.
  • the welding chamber 2 includes one or more conventional viewing windows 3 and sealed, gloved ports 5 for the welder to gain access to the airtight interior space 12 .
  • the present invention provides a laminar flow of an inert gas such as argon into the interior space 12 of the welding chamber 2 by way of two spaced-apart plates 4 and 6 and a gas manifold system 8 . While the welding chamber 2 is shown in the figures as having a rectangular cross-section in the plan view, other cross-sectional shapes, including without limitation a square-, circle-, or oval-shaped cross-section configuration, could also be employed.
  • the first of these plates is a steel purge/support plate 4 with a raised flange 16 around its perimeter.
  • a plurality of spaced-apart diffusers 20 are situated on the plate 4 wherein each diffuser communicates with a pipe of the manifold system 8 for the supply of inert gas thereto.
  • the diffusers 20 are made up of a sintered mass of metal spheres having a predetermined porosity to permit a controlled gas flow therethrough. In the presently preferred embodiment, the porosity of the diffusers is about 40 microns.
  • a presently preferred diffuser 20 is sold by Granger Industrial Supply, referred to in the Granger catalog as an exhaust muffler and identified as Granger item #1A325 at catalog page No. 3290. It will be understood that the type of diffuser and its porosity will depend upon the specific application and the gas flow desired.
  • the purge/support plate 4 measures about 5 feet wide and 10 feet long and is fitted with forty diffusers 20 at a spacing of about 11 inches in each of four longitudinally extending rows, with ten diffusers 20 in each row.
  • the spacers 22 are about 1 inch diameter cylindrical pieces and extend upwardly from the plate 4 about 1 inch, which is slightly higher than the tops of the diffusers 20 .
  • the top plate is a perforated steel plate 6 which serves the dual function of supporting the workpiece during welding and also to distribute the inert gas within the welding chamber 2 .
  • the perforated plate 6 has a plurality of spaced-apart holes 7 formed therethrough for the passage of inert gas into the chamber 2 .
  • the through holes 7 are, by way of example, 1 ⁇ 4 inch in diameter and spaced apart at 1 inch increments in each row.
  • the holes 7 in a row are staggered or offset from the holes 7 in adjacent rows.
  • the steel plate 6 is about 1 ⁇ 4 inch thick to permit the holes 7 to be punched rather than individually drilled.
  • two of the 1 ⁇ 4 inch thick plates 6 are used and placed one on top of the other with the through holes 7 in alignment in each of the 1 ⁇ 4 inch plates to provide a composite perforated plate 6 that is 1 ⁇ 2 inch in total thickness.
  • a 1 ⁇ 2 inch thick plate 6 is desired in the welding operation to provide the necessary strength to support a workpiece and resist warpage due to the thermal effects of the welding operation.
  • the perimeter of the perforated plate 6 is placed on the raised flange 16 of the purge plate 4 and is secured thereto around the perimeter by screws, for example, with a gas sealing gasket 18 applied between the flange 16 and the perimeter of the plate 6 .
  • the plurality of support spacers 22 engage the central area of the underside of the perforated plate 6 and maintain a small spaced-apart relationship between the underside of the plate 6 and the tops of the diffusers 20 so as not to damage or crush the diffusers which might otherwise occur.
  • a plurality of vertical legs 14 , cross beams 15 , and longitudinal beams 17 are provided to support the purge plate 4 and the attached upper perforated plate 6 .
  • the upper perforated plate also functions as the workpiece support table top.
  • a vent 10 is associated with the welding chamber 2 in communication with the interior space 12 thereof.
  • the vent 10 opens and closes in a controlled manner to permit air and/or gas to be purged from the interior 12 of the chamber 2 .
  • the vent 10 is opened for the initial purge cycle and closes when purging is complete.
  • the inert gas flow rate and vent size, diffuser porosity, etc. are determined depending upon the application or size of the chamber 2 .
  • An experimental mockup chamber 2 was constructed, measuring 2′ ⁇ 2′ ⁇ 2′6′′. Improved purging was demonstrated using diffusers 20 . Argon gas initial purging of atmospheric air from this mockup chamber was accomplished in six minutes using four diffusers 20 and a 1 ⁇ 2′′ diameter vent 10 with a flow rate of argon of 2.5 cubic feet per minute (CFM).
  • CFM cubic feet per minute
  • a full size welding chamber 2 described above measuring about 11′ ⁇ 5′ ⁇ 4′ was also purged in six minutes using forty diffusers 20 (porosity 40 microns) using a 4 inch diameter vent 10 and an additional 11 ⁇ 2 inch diameter vent and a flow rate of argon of over 100 CFM for optimum results in the initial purge.
  • Initial purging was also successful at lower flow rates, but at an argon flow rate of 70 CFM, the purge time dropped off.
  • Initial purging trials on the mockup chamber using two flow rates, 2.5 CFM (150 CF/hour) and 50 CFH showed the same savings in argon usage, namely, about a 50% savings in argon over standard production.
  • the lower purging gas flow rate took about three times longer than the higher flow rate since the lower flow rate was only 1 ⁇ 3 that of the higher rate.
  • the low turbulence initial purge cycle provided by the laminar flow front of the present invention reduces the initial atmospheric air containing 21% oxygen in the chamber 2 to an atmosphere of less than 60 parts per million of oxygen, which is ideal for the welding operation.
  • the flow rate of argon is decreased dramatically in a step referred to as the maintenance purge.
  • the argon flow may be controlled at three levels. High flow is controlled at >100 CFM of argon in the initial purge; a lower flow is controlled at about 12 CFM of argon in the maintenance purge; and a standby level is set in which there is no continuous flow, just short duration bursts of argon are used to maintain a set chamber pressure.
  • the exhaust gas may be analyzed to determine the oxygen content in order to control the flow of argon (or other inert gas) into the chamber according to the three levels of flow discussed above.
  • the gas pressure in the chamber is also monitored and controlled to adjust the inert gas flow rates and to maintain the set chamber gas pressure during welding.
  • An argon gas pressure in the weld chamber of between 3′′-4′′ of water column (manometer) has been found to be satisfactory for production purposes.
  • we prefer to conduct a simple weld test wherein a weld bead is deposited on a test plate within the chamber 2 . If the weld bead is shiny, it indicates that there is an acceptable low level of oxygen present. On the other hand, if the weld bead on the test plate is discolored, the oxygen level is too high and additional purging is conducted.
  • a simple timer device may then be used for subsequent initial purge cycles of that chamber based on the time required for initial purging in the previous cycle.
  • the present invention provides a low turbulence, high flow purge system that produces a laminar flow front which displaces the air in the chamber with very little mixing, so as to greatly improve the cost and efficiency of the purge process.
  • the initial trials of the apparatus and method of the present invention showed a 50% reduction in argon usage and up to a 75% reduction in standby/turnaround time for each pre-purge cycle.
  • the above-described weld chamber 2 using an argon atmosphere is ideally suited for welding workpieces made of titanium based alloys, titanium aluminides, nickel based materials, or other alloys requiring an inert atmosphere during welding.
  • the present invention is also suitable for use in purging and maintaining an inert atmosphere in interlock or antechambers used in combination with large weld chambers where it is desired to constantly maintain an inert atmosphere.

Abstract

Apparatus and method for purging atmospheric air from a chamber with a gas including means for generating a substantially non-turbulent, laminar flow front of the gas into the chamber with minimal turbulence to displace the atmospheric air in the chamber, the chamber having exhaust means associated therewith to permit the displaced atmospheric air to exit the chamber. The chamber is preferably a welding chamber and the gas is preferably argon.

Description

    CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS
  • This application claims priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/251,751 filed on Oct. 15, 2009, the entire contents of which are incorporated by reference herein.
  • BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
  • 1. Field of the Invention
  • The present invention relates generally to apparatus and methods for purging atmospheric air from an enclosed chamber, such as a welding chamber, and replacing the air with an inert gas.
  • 2. Description of Related Art
  • In the manufacture/repair of complex investment cast shapes for aerospace, medical and land based systems markets, it is oftentimes necessary to perform a welding operation.
  • For some alloys, particularly titanium alloys, there is a requirement to perform welding in a sealed chamber of argon. In this application, a part is loaded into a chamber and the air is removed by introducing argon to the chamber and expelling the air through mixing/volume exchanges.
  • The current methodology used to obtain an acceptable inert atmosphere in a chamber or enclosed work area for processes such as welding, an atmosphere with extremely low oxygen, <60 ppm O2 and moisture levels, >−40° F. is obtained as follows. The standard method to purge a non-interlock chamber is to pipe argon into the chamber at a high rate of flow, the argon mixing with the air already in the chamber, which causes both high purity argon and air to be exhausted from the chamber to atmosphere until an acceptable work environment is obtained.
  • This current production method used to purge large non-interlock welding chambers (e.g. 11′×5′×4′) typically takes a minimum of 8-9 volume changes of argon and 30 plus minutes to obtain an acceptable welding environment. This process wastes large quantities of argon and time (decreases throughput and creates a large amount of idle time).
  • SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
  • The present invention solves the problems heretofore encountered in purging-enclosed chambers by providing a system which greatly reduces the time and gas required to purge atmospheric air from the chamber and replace it with another gas, such as argon. The present invention accomplishes this desired result by introducing the replacement/purge gas into the enclosed chamber using a low turbulence, high flow purge system that produces a laminar flow front which displaces the atmospheric air in the chamber with very little mixing of the air and replacement/purge gas, such as argon. In a non-turbulent flow state, the argon remains below the atmospheric air in the chamber due to the higher density of argon relative to air and pushes the air from the chamber through exhaust means at the top of the chamber. The invention also provides a significant savings in the amount of inert gas, such as argon, required to displace the air in the chamber compared with current purging systems/methods. Briefly stated, the system of the present invention includes an enclosed chamber, a perforated plate having a plurality of through holes positioned within the chamber, a purge support plate positioned in a spaced relationship beneath the perforated plate and manifold means communicating with a plurality of spaced-apart diffusers mounted on the purge support plate. An inert gas source, such as argon, communicates with the manifold means. The inert gas passes through the diffusers and enters the space between the purge support plate and the perforated plate to subsequently pass through the spaced-apart holes and enter the chamber in a laminar flow front to purge the atmospheric air from the chamber. The chamber includes controlled vent means to permit the egress of the purged air and inert gas therefrom.
  • BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
  • FIG. 1 is a fragmented, isometric, exploded view of the invention in a weld chamber;
  • FIG. 2 is a perspective view of the purge/support plate of the invention;
  • FIG. 3 is a perspective view of a portion of the perforated table top/work platform plate of the invention;
  • FIG. 4 is an elevation view of a welding chamber in which the purge system of the invention is used;
  • FIG. 5 is a perspective view of the piping manifold on the underside of the purge plate of FIG. 2;
  • FIG. 6 is a perspective view of the purge/support plate of FIG. 2 viewed from another angle showing a spaced-apart array of gas diffusers and support members mounted on the upper side of the purge plate;
  • FIG. 7(A) is a plan view of the work table with the purge plate and perforated work support plate of the invention depicted therein;
  • FIG. 7(B) is a front elevation view of the work table with the purge plate and perforated work support plate of the invention depicted therein; and
  • FIG. 7(C) is a plan view of the perforated work support plate.
  • DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
  • As shown in FIG. 1, the present invention not only recognizes the density difference between argon and air but also relies on the inert gas distribution system to provide a non-turbulent, laminar flow front of inert gas. This system is designed to provide for multiple inlets which rapidly distribute a large volume of inert gas such as argon at a low pressure across the entire chamber floor. This is accomplished by controlling pipe size and the addition of flow restriction diffuser devices to equalize the flow of all supply outlets. Also, the exhaust outlet must be sized to accommodate a high flow with minimal back pressure. This system can also be accompanied with a perforated plate system which protects piping outlets/flow restriction device, increases uniformity of gas flow, and also provides a stable working platform to support the workpiece to be welded, for example.
  • A presently preferred embodiment of the invention depicted in the drawings is directed to a welding chamber 2, but it will be understood that the invention is useful for other types of chambers where an inert atmosphere is required for work to be performed.
  • As depicted in FIG. 1, the welding chamber 2 is a housing which encloses an airtight interior space 12 within which the welding operation is to be performed. The welding chamber 2 includes one or more conventional viewing windows 3 and sealed, gloved ports 5 for the welder to gain access to the airtight interior space 12. The present invention provides a laminar flow of an inert gas such as argon into the interior space 12 of the welding chamber 2 by way of two spaced- apart plates 4 and 6 and a gas manifold system 8. While the welding chamber 2 is shown in the figures as having a rectangular cross-section in the plan view, other cross-sectional shapes, including without limitation a square-, circle-, or oval-shaped cross-section configuration, could also be employed.
  • The first of these plates is a steel purge/support plate 4 with a raised flange 16 around its perimeter. A plurality of spaced-apart diffusers 20 are situated on the plate 4 wherein each diffuser communicates with a pipe of the manifold system 8 for the supply of inert gas thereto. The diffusers 20 are made up of a sintered mass of metal spheres having a predetermined porosity to permit a controlled gas flow therethrough. In the presently preferred embodiment, the porosity of the diffusers is about 40 microns. A presently preferred diffuser 20 is sold by Granger Industrial Supply, referred to in the Granger catalog as an exhaust muffler and identified as Granger item #1A325 at catalog page No. 3290. It will be understood that the type of diffuser and its porosity will depend upon the specific application and the gas flow desired.
  • In the present embodiment, the purge/support plate 4 measures about 5 feet wide and 10 feet long and is fitted with forty diffusers 20 at a spacing of about 11 inches in each of four longitudinally extending rows, with ten diffusers 20 in each row.
  • Between the rows of diffusers 20 are situated a plurality of spaced-apart steel support spacers 22 which are tac welded to the purge plate 4. The spacers 22 are about 1 inch diameter cylindrical pieces and extend upwardly from the plate 4 about 1 inch, which is slightly higher than the tops of the diffusers 20.
  • The top plate is a perforated steel plate 6 which serves the dual function of supporting the workpiece during welding and also to distribute the inert gas within the welding chamber 2. The perforated plate 6 has a plurality of spaced-apart holes 7 formed therethrough for the passage of inert gas into the chamber 2. The through holes 7 are, by way of example, ¼ inch in diameter and spaced apart at 1 inch increments in each row. The holes 7 in a row are staggered or offset from the holes 7 in adjacent rows. For purposes of economy, the steel plate 6 is about ¼ inch thick to permit the holes 7 to be punched rather than individually drilled. Accordingly, two of the ¼ inch thick plates 6 are used and placed one on top of the other with the through holes 7 in alignment in each of the ¼ inch plates to provide a composite perforated plate 6 that is ½ inch in total thickness. A ½ inch thick plate 6 is desired in the welding operation to provide the necessary strength to support a workpiece and resist warpage due to the thermal effects of the welding operation.
  • The perimeter of the perforated plate 6 is placed on the raised flange 16 of the purge plate 4 and is secured thereto around the perimeter by screws, for example, with a gas sealing gasket 18 applied between the flange 16 and the perimeter of the plate 6. The plurality of support spacers 22 engage the central area of the underside of the perforated plate 6 and maintain a small spaced-apart relationship between the underside of the plate 6 and the tops of the diffusers 20 so as not to damage or crush the diffusers which might otherwise occur.
  • In order to create a raised platform or work table of a convenient height for the weld chamber 2, a plurality of vertical legs 14, cross beams 15, and longitudinal beams 17 are provided to support the purge plate 4 and the attached upper perforated plate 6. As stated above, the upper perforated plate also functions as the workpiece support table top.
  • A vent 10 is associated with the welding chamber 2 in communication with the interior space 12 thereof. The vent 10 opens and closes in a controlled manner to permit air and/or gas to be purged from the interior 12 of the chamber 2. The vent 10 is opened for the initial purge cycle and closes when purging is complete. The inert gas flow rate and vent size, diffuser porosity, etc. are determined depending upon the application or size of the chamber 2.
  • An experimental mockup chamber 2 was constructed, measuring 2′×2′×2′6″. Improved purging was demonstrated using diffusers 20. Argon gas initial purging of atmospheric air from this mockup chamber was accomplished in six minutes using four diffusers 20 and a ½″ diameter vent 10 with a flow rate of argon of 2.5 cubic feet per minute (CFM).
  • A full size welding chamber 2 described above measuring about 11′×5′×4′ was also purged in six minutes using forty diffusers 20 (porosity 40 microns) using a 4 inch diameter vent 10 and an additional 1½ inch diameter vent and a flow rate of argon of over 100 CFM for optimum results in the initial purge. Initial purging was also successful at lower flow rates, but at an argon flow rate of 70 CFM, the purge time dropped off. Initial purging trials on the mockup chamber using two flow rates, 2.5 CFM (150 CF/hour) and 50 CFH showed the same savings in argon usage, namely, about a 50% savings in argon over standard production. The lower purging gas flow rate, however, took about three times longer than the higher flow rate since the lower flow rate was only ⅓ that of the higher rate.
  • The low turbulence initial purge cycle provided by the laminar flow front of the present invention reduces the initial atmospheric air containing 21% oxygen in the chamber 2 to an atmosphere of less than 60 parts per million of oxygen, which is ideal for the welding operation.
  • After an acceptable atmosphere is obtained within the chamber 2 after the initial purge step, the flow rate of argon is decreased dramatically in a step referred to as the maintenance purge. In the present example, the argon flow may be controlled at three levels. High flow is controlled at >100 CFM of argon in the initial purge; a lower flow is controlled at about 12 CFM of argon in the maintenance purge; and a standby level is set in which there is no continuous flow, just short duration bursts of argon are used to maintain a set chamber pressure.
  • During the initial purge of atmospheric air from the chamber, the exhaust gas may be analyzed to determine the oxygen content in order to control the flow of argon (or other inert gas) into the chamber according to the three levels of flow discussed above. The gas pressure in the chamber is also monitored and controlled to adjust the inert gas flow rates and to maintain the set chamber gas pressure during welding. An argon gas pressure in the weld chamber of between 3″-4″ of water column (manometer) has been found to be satisfactory for production purposes. Instead of analyzing the oxygen content in the exhaust gas, we prefer to conduct a simple weld test wherein a weld bead is deposited on a test plate within the chamber 2. If the weld bead is shiny, it indicates that there is an acceptable low level of oxygen present. On the other hand, if the weld bead on the test plate is discolored, the oxygen level is too high and additional purging is conducted.
  • After the initial purge of the welding chamber 2 has taken place and an acceptable oxygen level has been obtained, a simple timer device may then be used for subsequent initial purge cycles of that chamber based on the time required for initial purging in the previous cycle.
  • Thus, it will be understood that the present invention provides a low turbulence, high flow purge system that produces a laminar flow front which displaces the air in the chamber with very little mixing, so as to greatly improve the cost and efficiency of the purge process. The initial trials of the apparatus and method of the present invention showed a 50% reduction in argon usage and up to a 75% reduction in standby/turnaround time for each pre-purge cycle.
  • The above-described weld chamber 2 using an argon atmosphere is ideally suited for welding workpieces made of titanium based alloys, titanium aluminides, nickel based materials, or other alloys requiring an inert atmosphere during welding. The present invention is also suitable for use in purging and maintaining an inert atmosphere in interlock or antechambers used in combination with large weld chambers where it is desired to constantly maintain an inert atmosphere.
  • While specific embodiments of the invention have been described in detail, it will be appreciated by those skilled in the art that various modifications and alternatives to those details could be developed in light of the overall teachings of the disclosure. The presently preferred embodiments described herein are meant to be illustrative only and not limiting as to the scope of the invention which is to be given the full breadth of the appended claims and any and all equivalents thereof.

Claims (10)

1. Apparatus for purging atmospheric air from a chamber with a gas comprising means for generating a substantially non-turbulent, laminar flow front of the gas into the chamber with minimal turbulence to displace the atmospheric air in the chamber, said chamber having exhaust means associated therewith to permit the displaced atmospheric air to exit the chamber.
2. The apparatus of claim 1 wherein the means for generating a laminar flow front comprises a perforated plate positioned within the chamber having a plurality of spaced-apart holes formed therethrough, a purge support plate positioned in a spaced relation beneath the perforated plate, said purge support plate having a plurality of spaced-apart diffusers affixed thereto and a manifold means communicating with the diffusers and adapted to supply the gas to the diffusers, whereby the gas is emitted to the diffusers to enter the space between the purge support plate and the perforated plate to pass through the holes in the perforated plate creating a low turbulent, laminar flow front of gas to displace the atmospheric air in the chamber.
3. The apparatus of claim 1 in the form of a welding chamber.
4. A method for purging atmospheric air from a chamber comprising the steps of:
(a) providing an airtight chamber having exhaust means associated therewith;
(b) providing means for generating a substantially non-turbulent, laminar flow front of a gas into the chamber to displace the atmospheric air in the chamber; and
(c) exhausting the displaced atmospheric air from the chamber through the exhaust means.
5. The method of claim 4 wherein the means for generating the substantially non-turbulent, laminar flow front of the gas provided in step (b) comprises the apparatus of claim 2.
6. The method of claim 5 wherein the chamber is a welding chamber.
7. A method of welding comprising the steps of:
(a) providing an airtight weld chamber having exhaust means associated therewith;
(b) providing means for generating a substantially non-turbulent, laminar flow front of an inert gas into the chamber;
(c) conducting an initial purge with the inert gas according to step (b) at a desired flow rate to displace atmospheric air from the chamber and exhausting the displaced atmospheric air from the weld chamber through the exhaust means until an oxygen content in the weld chamber is at a desired level; and
(d) conducting a maintenance purge after step (c) by decreasing the flow rate of inert gas so as to maintain the weld chamber at or below the desired oxygen level during welding.
8. The method of claim 7, including conducting a standby step after conclusion of welding in step (d) by halting the continuous flow of inert gas into the weld chamber, and initiating short bursts of inert gas periodically to maintain a desired gas pressure in the weld chamber.
9. The method of claim 7 wherein the desired level of oxygen in the weld chamber is detected by providing a test plate in the weld chamber and depositing a weld bead on the test plate, wherein a shiny weld bead deposited on the test plate indicates an acceptable level of oxygen is present.
10. The method of claim 7 wherein the inert gas is argon.
US12/903,502 2009-10-15 2010-10-13 Low Turbulence Argon Purging System Abandoned US20110089225A1 (en)

Priority Applications (5)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US12/903,502 US20110089225A1 (en) 2009-10-15 2010-10-13 Low Turbulence Argon Purging System
CA2777423A CA2777423C (en) 2009-10-15 2010-10-14 Low turbulence argon purging system
EP10824083.9A EP2488323A4 (en) 2009-10-15 2010-10-14 Low turbulence argon purging system
PCT/US2010/052641 WO2011047138A2 (en) 2009-10-15 2010-10-14 Low turbulence argon purging system
US13/452,969 US9566659B2 (en) 2009-10-15 2012-04-23 Chamber with low turbulence argon purging system

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US25175109P 2009-10-15 2009-10-15
US12/903,502 US20110089225A1 (en) 2009-10-15 2010-10-13 Low Turbulence Argon Purging System

Related Child Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US13/452,969 Division US9566659B2 (en) 2009-10-15 2012-04-23 Chamber with low turbulence argon purging system

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US20110089225A1 true US20110089225A1 (en) 2011-04-21

Family

ID=43876862

Family Applications (2)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US12/903,502 Abandoned US20110089225A1 (en) 2009-10-15 2010-10-13 Low Turbulence Argon Purging System
US13/452,969 Active 2032-07-20 US9566659B2 (en) 2009-10-15 2012-04-23 Chamber with low turbulence argon purging system

Family Applications After (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US13/452,969 Active 2032-07-20 US9566659B2 (en) 2009-10-15 2012-04-23 Chamber with low turbulence argon purging system

Country Status (4)

Country Link
US (2) US20110089225A1 (en)
EP (1) EP2488323A4 (en)
CA (1) CA2777423C (en)
WO (1) WO2011047138A2 (en)

Cited By (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20160221107A1 (en) * 2015-02-02 2016-08-04 Illinois Tool Works Inc. Welding power system with integrated purge gas control
US10232459B2 (en) * 2016-11-27 2019-03-19 Hydra Heating Industries, LLC Displacement welding chamber
CN115178840A (en) * 2022-08-08 2022-10-14 内蒙古第一机械集团股份有限公司 Titanium alloy welding gas protection device

Families Citing this family (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN106206365B (en) * 2015-05-26 2019-04-30 先进科技新加坡有限公司 Die molding device with inert gas environment
DE102016220509A1 (en) * 2016-10-19 2018-04-19 Kjellberg-Stiftung Schleppgasdüse

Citations (16)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US2918563A (en) * 1956-07-05 1959-12-22 Trefileries Et Laminoirs De Pr Welding devices for metallic pieces
US4078167A (en) * 1977-02-09 1978-03-07 United Technologies Corporation Welding shield and plasma suppressor apparatus
US4480585A (en) * 1983-06-23 1984-11-06 Energy Conversion Devices, Inc. External isolation module
US4599505A (en) * 1983-03-31 1986-07-08 The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Navy Flexible trailing shield for welding reactive metals
US4880581A (en) * 1986-12-24 1989-11-14 Alcon Laboratories, Inc. Means and method for aseptic particle-free production of articles
US5235152A (en) * 1991-06-18 1993-08-10 Werner Jankus Device for flooding a weld seam between two pipes to be welded with gas
US5319179A (en) * 1991-12-19 1994-06-07 Mtu Maintenance Gmbh Method and apparatus for welding workpieces made of superalloys
US5556559A (en) * 1995-02-28 1996-09-17 Lockhead Martin Corporation Backside shielding assembly for plasma arc welding
US5685771A (en) * 1996-07-01 1997-11-11 C-K Worldwide Inc. Enclosure for maintaining a controlled atmosphere around a work station
US5814789A (en) * 1996-07-18 1998-09-29 Btu International, Inc. Forced convection furnance gas plenum
US6261171B1 (en) * 1999-04-15 2001-07-17 Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd. Movable multi-function maintenance apparatus
US6772827B2 (en) * 2000-01-20 2004-08-10 Applied Materials, Inc. Suspended gas distribution manifold for plasma chamber
US20050103754A1 (en) * 2002-02-15 2005-05-19 Olsen Flemming O. Method of electron beam processing
US7129436B1 (en) * 2005-09-06 2006-10-31 Joseph E. Corne Laminar-vortex welding chamber
US7159755B2 (en) * 2004-02-05 2007-01-09 General Electric Company Method and apparatus for rebuilding gas turbine engines
US20090230094A1 (en) * 2008-03-14 2009-09-17 Corne Joseph E Open-top welding chamber

Family Cites Families (21)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US2786740A (en) * 1954-07-09 1957-03-26 Air Reduction Special atmosphere device
US3188446A (en) * 1961-10-10 1965-06-08 William E Ray Method and apparatus for assembly of nuclear control rods and fuel tubes
US3895570A (en) * 1973-09-27 1975-07-22 Baker Company Inc Air-insulated work station
US3986850A (en) * 1974-12-05 1976-10-19 Flanders Filters, Inc. Flow control apparatus and air filters
US4098174A (en) * 1976-04-08 1978-07-04 Landy Jerome J Total exhaust laminar flow biological fume hood safety cabinet and method
US4100847A (en) * 1976-12-20 1978-07-18 Labconco Corporation Convertible, laminar flow biological safety cabinet apparatus
US4492843A (en) 1982-09-01 1985-01-08 Westinghouse Electric Corp. Apparatus and method for laser machining in a non-reactive environment
US4667580A (en) * 1984-07-19 1987-05-26 Wetzel Lawrence E Clean room module
US5473258A (en) * 1991-08-02 1995-12-05 Tokyo Electron Limited Probe apparatus for carrying away dust created by probe testing
US5219215A (en) * 1991-12-03 1993-06-15 Intelmatec Corporation Modular clean bench system
DK85093D0 (en) * 1993-07-16 1993-07-16 Landsforeningen Til Kraeftens METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR PERFORMING OPERATIONS
US5347103A (en) * 1993-08-31 1994-09-13 Btu International Convection furnace using shimmed gas amplifier
US5419886A (en) * 1994-03-08 1995-05-30 Rockwell International Corporation Method for generation of finely divided reactive plutonium oxide powder
JPH0890255A (en) * 1994-09-14 1996-04-09 Hitachi Ltd Partial vacuum electron beam welding equipment
US6124568A (en) * 1998-12-31 2000-09-26 General Electric Company Heating apparatus for a welding operation and method therefor
KR100348867B1 (en) * 1999-06-14 2002-08-17 박헌양 a vacuum welding system for an alloy of nonferrous metals
US6297474B1 (en) * 1999-12-23 2001-10-02 General Electric Company Heating apparatus for a welding operation and method therefor
GB2360580A (en) * 2000-03-21 2001-09-26 Microflow Ltd Cabinets for handling toxic or sterile materials
GB2373749A (en) 2001-03-27 2002-10-02 Rolls Royce Plc Apparatus and method for forming a body
US7040239B2 (en) * 2002-09-25 2006-05-09 Black & Decker Inc. Downdraft table
US7780248B2 (en) * 2005-07-19 2010-08-24 Merrick & Company Glovebox for a double wall containment module

Patent Citations (16)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US2918563A (en) * 1956-07-05 1959-12-22 Trefileries Et Laminoirs De Pr Welding devices for metallic pieces
US4078167A (en) * 1977-02-09 1978-03-07 United Technologies Corporation Welding shield and plasma suppressor apparatus
US4599505A (en) * 1983-03-31 1986-07-08 The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Navy Flexible trailing shield for welding reactive metals
US4480585A (en) * 1983-06-23 1984-11-06 Energy Conversion Devices, Inc. External isolation module
US4880581A (en) * 1986-12-24 1989-11-14 Alcon Laboratories, Inc. Means and method for aseptic particle-free production of articles
US5235152A (en) * 1991-06-18 1993-08-10 Werner Jankus Device for flooding a weld seam between two pipes to be welded with gas
US5319179A (en) * 1991-12-19 1994-06-07 Mtu Maintenance Gmbh Method and apparatus for welding workpieces made of superalloys
US5556559A (en) * 1995-02-28 1996-09-17 Lockhead Martin Corporation Backside shielding assembly for plasma arc welding
US5685771A (en) * 1996-07-01 1997-11-11 C-K Worldwide Inc. Enclosure for maintaining a controlled atmosphere around a work station
US5814789A (en) * 1996-07-18 1998-09-29 Btu International, Inc. Forced convection furnance gas plenum
US6261171B1 (en) * 1999-04-15 2001-07-17 Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd. Movable multi-function maintenance apparatus
US6772827B2 (en) * 2000-01-20 2004-08-10 Applied Materials, Inc. Suspended gas distribution manifold for plasma chamber
US20050103754A1 (en) * 2002-02-15 2005-05-19 Olsen Flemming O. Method of electron beam processing
US7159755B2 (en) * 2004-02-05 2007-01-09 General Electric Company Method and apparatus for rebuilding gas turbine engines
US7129436B1 (en) * 2005-09-06 2006-10-31 Joseph E. Corne Laminar-vortex welding chamber
US20090230094A1 (en) * 2008-03-14 2009-09-17 Corne Joseph E Open-top welding chamber

Non-Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
John Straube, "BSI-022: The Perfect HVAC", 2009/7/10, http://www.buildingscience.com/documents/insights/bsi-022-the-perfect-hvac *

Cited By (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20160221107A1 (en) * 2015-02-02 2016-08-04 Illinois Tool Works Inc. Welding power system with integrated purge gas control
US10201871B2 (en) * 2015-02-02 2019-02-12 Illinois Tool Works Inc. Welding power system with integrated purge gas control
US11278982B2 (en) * 2015-02-02 2022-03-22 Illinois Tool Works Inc. Welding power system with integrated purge gas control
US10232459B2 (en) * 2016-11-27 2019-03-19 Hydra Heating Industries, LLC Displacement welding chamber
CN115178840A (en) * 2022-08-08 2022-10-14 内蒙古第一机械集团股份有限公司 Titanium alloy welding gas protection device

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
EP2488323A4 (en) 2017-08-16
CA2777423A1 (en) 2011-04-21
WO2011047138A2 (en) 2011-04-21
WO2011047138A3 (en) 2011-09-22
US20120199636A1 (en) 2012-08-09
EP2488323A2 (en) 2012-08-22
CA2777423C (en) 2017-03-28
US9566659B2 (en) 2017-02-14

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US9566659B2 (en) Chamber with low turbulence argon purging system
US9777371B2 (en) ALD systems and methods
TWI708860B (en) Deposition apparatus including edge plenum showerhead assembly
KR102280026B1 (en) mixed gas supply
JP3531736B2 (en) Carburizing method and carburizing device
KR102005688B1 (en) Gas enclosure system
US9123758B2 (en) Gas injection apparatus and substrate process chamber incorporating same
EP2535137B1 (en) Apparatus for and method of providing an inerting gas during soldering
TW200507141A (en) Method of mass flow control flow verification and calibration
JP2015092118A (en) Bundle trailer for sending out gas
KR20080013994A (en) Device for centring and clamping tubular parts, comprising means for regulating the gas flow rate in order to control the oxygen content
JPS6343782A (en) Inert gas controller for high-frequency pressure welding
EP0528153A1 (en) Multi-layer fluid curtains for furnace openings
US20080067219A1 (en) Apparatus and Method for Wave Soldering
KR20150079145A (en) Apparatus firing ceramic substrate
US3012591A (en) Gas purging method and apparatus
US7992760B2 (en) Conduit purging device and method
RU2019122148A (en) DEVICE AND METHOD FOR 3D-PRINTING PRODUCTS
KR102462732B1 (en) Laser welding jig
KR20080016599A (en) Device for centring and clamping tubular parts, comprising means for the real-time measurement and regulation of the moisture content
JPH1041286A (en) Plasma cvd apparatus
KR101847834B1 (en) Condition managing method
CZ20827U1 (en) Device for saturation of liquid with gas
JP2006507405A5 (en)
KR20200005805A (en) Laser welding jig

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AS Assignment

Owner name: PCC STRUCTURALS INC., OREGON

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:PATRICK, LEE;BRAYSHAW, DAVID;WITTKOP, SCOTT;AND OTHERS;SIGNING DATES FROM 20091117 TO 20100402;REEL/FRAME:025132/0221

STCB Information on status: application discontinuation

Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION