US20110118597A1 - System and method for surgical instrument disablement via image-guided position feedback - Google Patents
System and method for surgical instrument disablement via image-guided position feedback Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- US20110118597A1 US20110118597A1 US13/013,655 US201113013655A US2011118597A1 US 20110118597 A1 US20110118597 A1 US 20110118597A1 US 201113013655 A US201113013655 A US 201113013655A US 2011118597 A1 US2011118597 A1 US 2011118597A1
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- interest
- region
- living subject
- surgical instrument
- surgical
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Abandoned
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B90/00—Instruments, implements or accessories specially adapted for surgery or diagnosis and not covered by any of the groups A61B1/00 - A61B50/00, e.g. for luxation treatment or for protecting wound edges
- A61B90/10—Instruments, implements or accessories specially adapted for surgery or diagnosis and not covered by any of the groups A61B1/00 - A61B50/00, e.g. for luxation treatment or for protecting wound edges for stereotaxic surgery, e.g. frame-based stereotaxis
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B34/00—Computer-aided surgery; Manipulators or robots specially adapted for use in surgery
- A61B34/20—Surgical navigation systems; Devices for tracking or guiding surgical instruments, e.g. for frameless stereotaxis
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B90/00—Instruments, implements or accessories specially adapted for surgery or diagnosis and not covered by any of the groups A61B1/00 - A61B50/00, e.g. for luxation treatment or for protecting wound edges
- A61B90/10—Instruments, implements or accessories specially adapted for surgery or diagnosis and not covered by any of the groups A61B1/00 - A61B50/00, e.g. for luxation treatment or for protecting wound edges for stereotaxic surgery, e.g. frame-based stereotaxis
- A61B90/14—Fixators for body parts, e.g. skull clamps; Constructional details of fixators, e.g. pins
- A61B90/16—Bite blocks
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B90/00—Instruments, implements or accessories specially adapted for surgery or diagnosis and not covered by any of the groups A61B1/00 - A61B50/00, e.g. for luxation treatment or for protecting wound edges
- A61B90/36—Image-producing devices or illumination devices not otherwise provided for
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B90/00—Instruments, implements or accessories specially adapted for surgery or diagnosis and not covered by any of the groups A61B1/00 - A61B50/00, e.g. for luxation treatment or for protecting wound edges
- A61B90/39—Markers, e.g. radio-opaque or breast lesions markers
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B17/00—Surgical instruments, devices or methods, e.g. tourniquets
- A61B17/24—Surgical instruments, devices or methods, e.g. tourniquets for use in the oral cavity, larynx, bronchial passages or nose; Tongue scrapers
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B17/00—Surgical instruments, devices or methods, e.g. tourniquets
- A61B2017/00017—Electrical control of surgical instruments
- A61B2017/00022—Sensing or detecting at the treatment site
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B17/00—Surgical instruments, devices or methods, e.g. tourniquets
- A61B2017/00017—Electrical control of surgical instruments
- A61B2017/00022—Sensing or detecting at the treatment site
- A61B2017/00026—Conductivity or impedance, e.g. of tissue
- A61B2017/00035—Conductivity or impedance, e.g. of tissue pH
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B17/00—Surgical instruments, devices or methods, e.g. tourniquets
- A61B2017/00017—Electrical control of surgical instruments
- A61B2017/00022—Sensing or detecting at the treatment site
- A61B2017/00057—Light
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B17/00—Surgical instruments, devices or methods, e.g. tourniquets
- A61B2017/00017—Electrical control of surgical instruments
- A61B2017/00022—Sensing or detecting at the treatment site
- A61B2017/00106—Sensing or detecting at the treatment site ultrasonic
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B17/00—Surgical instruments, devices or methods, e.g. tourniquets
- A61B2017/00017—Electrical control of surgical instruments
- A61B2017/00115—Electrical control of surgical instruments with audible or visual output
- A61B2017/00119—Electrical control of surgical instruments with audible or visual output alarm; indicating an abnormal situation
- A61B2017/00123—Electrical control of surgical instruments with audible or visual output alarm; indicating an abnormal situation and automatic shutdown
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B17/00—Surgical instruments, devices or methods, e.g. tourniquets
- A61B2017/00017—Electrical control of surgical instruments
- A61B2017/00216—Electrical control of surgical instruments with eye tracking or head position tracking control
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B34/00—Computer-aided surgery; Manipulators or robots specially adapted for use in surgery
- A61B34/20—Surgical navigation systems; Devices for tracking or guiding surgical instruments, e.g. for frameless stereotaxis
- A61B2034/2046—Tracking techniques
- A61B2034/2051—Electromagnetic tracking systems
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B34/00—Computer-aided surgery; Manipulators or robots specially adapted for use in surgery
- A61B34/20—Surgical navigation systems; Devices for tracking or guiding surgical instruments, e.g. for frameless stereotaxis
- A61B2034/2046—Tracking techniques
- A61B2034/2055—Optical tracking systems
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B34/00—Computer-aided surgery; Manipulators or robots specially adapted for use in surgery
- A61B34/20—Surgical navigation systems; Devices for tracking or guiding surgical instruments, e.g. for frameless stereotaxis
- A61B2034/2072—Reference field transducer attached to an instrument or patient
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B90/00—Instruments, implements or accessories specially adapted for surgery or diagnosis and not covered by any of the groups A61B1/00 - A61B50/00, e.g. for luxation treatment or for protecting wound edges
- A61B90/08—Accessories or related features not otherwise provided for
- A61B2090/0801—Prevention of accidental cutting or pricking
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B90/00—Instruments, implements or accessories specially adapted for surgery or diagnosis and not covered by any of the groups A61B1/00 - A61B50/00, e.g. for luxation treatment or for protecting wound edges
- A61B90/08—Accessories or related features not otherwise provided for
- A61B2090/0801—Prevention of accidental cutting or pricking
- A61B2090/08021—Prevention of accidental cutting or pricking of the patient or his organs
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B90/00—Instruments, implements or accessories specially adapted for surgery or diagnosis and not covered by any of the groups A61B1/00 - A61B50/00, e.g. for luxation treatment or for protecting wound edges
- A61B90/36—Image-producing devices or illumination devices not otherwise provided for
- A61B2090/363—Use of fiducial points
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B90/00—Instruments, implements or accessories specially adapted for surgery or diagnosis and not covered by any of the groups A61B1/00 - A61B50/00, e.g. for luxation treatment or for protecting wound edges
- A61B90/36—Image-producing devices or illumination devices not otherwise provided for
- A61B2090/364—Correlation of different images or relation of image positions in respect to the body
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B90/00—Instruments, implements or accessories specially adapted for surgery or diagnosis and not covered by any of the groups A61B1/00 - A61B50/00, e.g. for luxation treatment or for protecting wound edges
- A61B90/36—Image-producing devices or illumination devices not otherwise provided for
- A61B90/37—Surgical systems with images on a monitor during operation
- A61B2090/372—Details of monitor hardware
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B90/00—Instruments, implements or accessories specially adapted for surgery or diagnosis and not covered by any of the groups A61B1/00 - A61B50/00, e.g. for luxation treatment or for protecting wound edges
- A61B90/36—Image-producing devices or illumination devices not otherwise provided for
- A61B90/37—Surgical systems with images on a monitor during operation
- A61B2090/374—NMR or MRI
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B90/00—Instruments, implements or accessories specially adapted for surgery or diagnosis and not covered by any of the groups A61B1/00 - A61B50/00, e.g. for luxation treatment or for protecting wound edges
- A61B90/39—Markers, e.g. radio-opaque or breast lesions markers
- A61B2090/3954—Markers, e.g. radio-opaque or breast lesions markers magnetic, e.g. NMR or MRI
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B90/00—Instruments, implements or accessories specially adapted for surgery or diagnosis and not covered by any of the groups A61B1/00 - A61B50/00, e.g. for luxation treatment or for protecting wound edges
- A61B90/39—Markers, e.g. radio-opaque or breast lesions markers
- A61B2090/3983—Reference marker arrangements for use with image guided surgery
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B90/00—Instruments, implements or accessories specially adapted for surgery or diagnosis and not covered by any of the groups A61B1/00 - A61B50/00, e.g. for luxation treatment or for protecting wound edges
- A61B90/50—Supports for surgical instruments, e.g. articulated arms
- A61B2090/502—Headgear, e.g. helmet, spectacles
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B34/00—Computer-aided surgery; Manipulators or robots specially adapted for use in surgery
- A61B34/10—Computer-aided planning, simulation or modelling of surgical operations
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B90/00—Instruments, implements or accessories specially adapted for surgery or diagnosis and not covered by any of the groups A61B1/00 - A61B50/00, e.g. for luxation treatment or for protecting wound edges
- A61B90/06—Measuring instruments not otherwise provided for
Definitions
- the present invention generally relates to a computer-assisted surgery and in particular to the utilization of a feedback trigger during a surgery to selectively disable a surgical instrument operating in a region of interest of a living subject.
- Radiographic imaging is often imperative for the pre-operative planning of surgical treatments for patients.
- Plain X-rays, computed tomography (hereinafter “CT”) images, and magnetic resonance (hereinafter “MR”) images facilitate surgical navigations.
- CT computed tomography
- MR magnetic resonance
- surgeons have sought innovative ways to further incorporate radiographic imaging into the surgical suite.
- orthopedic and vascular surgeons have relied upon intra-operative, real-time fluoroscopy, such as plain X-rays, to assess surgical treatments.
- real-time MR [1] and CT imaging surgical suites have been constructed where intra-operative MR or CT image is continuously updated displaying anatomic changes due to surgical treatment.
- IGS image-guided surgery
- GPS global-positioning systems
- An IGS system includes a pre-operative radiographic image (CT or MR image) that is acquired from a patient and digitized and stored on a computer.
- CT or MR image a pre-operative radiographic image
- OR the pre-operative radiographic image are registered to the anesthetized patient by correlating landmarks found on the pre-operative radiographic image with the landmarks on the anesthetized patient.
- Typical landmarks used for registration are anatomic points and/or fiducial markers attached to the skin or implanted in bone of a patient. Registration creates a transformation matrix that allows a direct mapping of the patient's current anatomy to the corresponding pre-operative radiographic image.
- an electronically visible probe such as infrared optical system and/or electromagnetic system
- the probe can be used as a pointer to identify surgical anatomy on CT or MR images.
- Registration landmarks for example, anatomic landmarks and/or fiducial markers, need to be immobile relative to the anatomy and arranged such that they surround the surgical field of interest. While multiple anatomic landmarks would initially appear useful, soft tissue, for instance, skin and muscle, relaxes and distorts under general anesthesia making boney landmarks necessary for accurate registration.
- a solution has been to implant markers into bone of a patient. This is routinely used in neurosurgery where screws are placed into the cranium prior to pre-operative radiographic imaging and these screws serve as landmarks for registration. While accuracy with such systems is impressive [6, 7], it does involve the invasive placement of bone screws with small, yet real, risk of infection and cosmetic deformity. Another solution is to use skin markers or skin contours. Such systems have shown decreased accuracy that is unacceptable in otologic applications [8].
- CSOM chronic serous otitis media
- cholesteatoma keratinizing squamous epithelium (skin) trapped within the middle ear cavity and leads to chronic infection, hearing loss, facial nerve paralysis, and vertigo.
- Both the CSOM and cholesteatoma are usually treated by an otologic surgery, for example, through a mastoidectomy, to remove diseased tissues from the temporal bone encasing the ear using a surgical drill and/or knife.
- adjacent structures surrounding the surgical site of the temporal bone such as the facial nerve, the inner ear, the floor of the cranial vault, the internal jugular vein and the carotid artery, are at great risk during the surgical treatment.
- IGS systems can improve overall standards of surgical treatments in both neurosurgery and sinus surgery. Specifically, IGS systems have improved surgical accuracy and reduce the risk of major complications in sinus surgery [9], and decreased operative time for neurosurgical procedures thus cutting costs [10]. In addition, patients treated with an IGS have more complete resection of diseased tissues with less collateral damage to healthy tissues [11] than that treated with a traditional surgery. It is anticipated that such advantages of the IGS systems would be also applicable to an otologic surgery. Epidemiologic and economic data supports the usefulness of an IGS in otologic procedures. However, applications have been limited by the need for millimeter and sub-millimeter accuracies to prevent injury to adjacent structures, such as the facial nerve and the inner ear. Therefore, a heretofore unaddressed need still exists in the art to address the aforementioned deficiencies and inadequacies.
- the present invention in one aspect, relates to a system for selectively disabling a surgical instrument operating in a surgical site of a region of interest of a living subject, where the surgical instrument has a distal end portion.
- the present invention can be practiced with respect to several surgical instruments and any combinations of them.
- the surgical instrument can be a drill, and the distal end portion of the surgical instrument is the tip of the drill.
- the surgical instrument can be a surgical scalpel, and the distal end portion of the surgical instrument is the cutting portion of the surgical scalpel.
- the surgical instrument can also be a suction device, and the distal end portion of the surgical instrument is the sucking portion of the suction device.
- the region of interest of the living subject may correspond to an ear portion, a mouth portion, a head portion, or other body portions of the living subject.
- the system includes means for noninvasively placing a number, M, of fiducial markers in an anatomic space of the region of interest of the living subject.
- the placing means has a locking dental acrylic resin splint (hereinafter “LADS”) mountable to a maxilla of the living subject, where the LADS includes a central portion with an extension at a predetermined position, and two lateral portions attached to the central portion.
- the placing means further has a fiducial frame attachable to the LADS by the extension for receiving the number M of fiducial markers.
- the fiducial frame comprises a frame structure, a first panel and an opposite, second panel extending upwardly from the frame structure, each of the first panel and the second panel defining a number of holes for receiving a corresponding number of fiducial markers.
- the fiducial frame is configured such that when the number M of fiducial markers are received therein, the centroid of each fiducial marker approximates the surgical site of the ear portion of the living subject and distance between at least one pair of two corresponding fiducial markers is maximized so as to minimize a target registration error.
- the system further includes means for pre-operatively measuring a location of each fiducial marker in the anatomic space of the region of interest of the living subject, an imaging acquisition device for pre-operatively acquiring an image volume from the region of interest of the living subject, where the pre-operatively acquired image volume includes the image of at least two of M fiducial markers, and a probe operatively coupled with the surgical instrument for intra-operatively monitoring a location of the distal end portion of the surgical instrument in the anatomic space of the region of interest of the living subject.
- the system includes a controller operatively coupled with the measuring means, the imaging acquisition device, the probe, and the surgical instrument, respectively.
- the controller is configured to perform the steps of identifying a centroid of each fiducial marker in the pre-operatively acquired image volume, registering the identified centroid of each fiducial marker in the pre-operatively acquired image volume to the pre-operatively measured location of the corresponding fiducial marker in the anatomic space so as to determine a registration transformation, mapping the intra-operatively monitored location of the distal end portion of the surgical instrument in the anatomic space onto a corresponding location in the pre-operatively acquired image volume by an inverse of the registration transformation, and generating a signal to disable the surgical instrument when the mapped location of the distal end portion of the surgical instrument is substantially close to a boundary of the surgical site of the region of interest in the pre-operatively acquired image volume.
- the system includes a number, N, of surgical markers, each placed in a surgically significant anatomic location serving as a registration target.
- the system has an alarm device communicating with the controller for generating an alarm when the mapped location of the distal end portion of the surgical instrument is within a predetermined distance to the boundary of the surgical site in the region of interest in the pre-operatively acquired image volume.
- the system includes an interlock device operatively associated with the surgical instrument and communicating with the controller, where the interlock device disables the surgical instrument when the mapped location of the distal end portion of the surgical instrument is within a predetermined distance to the boundary of the surgical site in the region of interest in the pre-operatively acquired image volume.
- the present invention relates to a method for selectively disabling a surgical instrument operating in a surgical site of a region of interest of a living subject, where the surgical instrument has a distal end portion, the region of interest of the living subject is surrounded with a plurality of markers.
- the plurality of markers includes a number, M, of fiducial markers determining an image registration and a number, N, of surgical markers with each surgical marker placed in a surgically significant anatomic location serving as a registration target.
- the region of interest of the living subject corresponds to an ear portion of the living subject.
- the method includes the step of pre-operatively acquiring an image volume from the region of interest of the living subject, where the pre-operatively acquired image volume contains the image of at least two of M fiducial markers. Furthermore, the method has the steps of identifying a centroid of each fiducial marker from the pre-operatively acquired image volume, pre-operatively measuring a location of each fiducial marker in an anatomic space of the region of interest of the living subject, registering the identified centroid of each fiducial marker in the pre-operatively acquired image volume to the pre-operatively measured location of the corresponding fiducial marker in the anatomic space so as to determine a registration transformation, intra-operatively monitoring a location of the distal end portion of the surgical instrument in the anatomic space of the region of interest of the living subject, and mapping the intra-operatively monitored location of the distal end portion of the surgical instrument in the anatomic space onto a corresponding location in the pre-operatively acquired image volume by an inverse of the registration transformation.
- the method includes the step of generating a signal to disable the surgical instrument when the mapped location of the distal end portion of the surgical instrument is substantially close to a boundary of the surgical site of the region of interest of the living subject in the pre-operatively acquired image volume.
- the method further has the step of mounting an LADS with an attached fiducial frame onto a maxilla of the living subject, where the fiducial frame is configured such that when the number M of fiducial markers are received therein, the centroid of each fiducial marker approximates the surgical site of the ear portion of the living subject and distance between at least one pair of two corresponding fiducial markers is maximized so as to minimize a target registration error.
- the method has the step of generating an alarm when the mapped location of the surgical instrument is within a predetermined distance to the boundary of the surgical site in the pre-operatively acquired image volume.
- the present invention relates to a system for selectively disabling a surgical instrument operating in a surgical site of a region of interest of a living subject, where the surgical instrument has a distal end portion and is operable by a surgeon during a surgery.
- the system has an eye-tracking device operatively coupled with the surgical instrument for intra-operatively tracking the visual line of sight of the surgeon and a location of the distal end portion of the surgical instrument in the region of interest of the living subject, respectively, and a controller operatively coupled with the surgical instrument and the eye-tracking device, respectively.
- the controller is configured to perform during the surgery the steps of determining an angle between a visual path connecting a predetermined point of the eye-tracking device and the distal end portion of the surgical instrument in the region of interest of the living subject and the line of sight of the surgeon, and generating a signal to disable the surgical instrument when the angle is larger than a predetermined angle.
- the eye-tracking device includes a head-hold device and has a sensor.
- the system in one embodiment, has a display communicating with the controller and the eye-tracking device for displaying the tracked line of sight of the surgeon and the tracked location of the distal end portion of the surgical instrument in the region of interest of the living subject, respectively.
- the present invention relates to a method for selectively disabling a surgical instrument operating in a surgical site of a region of interest of a living subject, where the surgical instrument has a distal end portion and is operable by a surgeon during a surgery.
- the method includes the steps of intra-operatively tracking the visual line of sight of the surgeon and a location of the distal end portion of the surgical instrument in the region of interest of the living subject, respectively, determining an angle between a visual path connecting a predetermined point of the eye-tracking device and the distal end portion of the surgical instrument in the region of interest of the living subject and the line of sight of the surgeon, and generating a signal to disable the surgical instrument when the angle is larger than a predetermined angle.
- the present invention relates to a system for selectively disabling a surgical instrument operating in a surgical site of a region of interest of a living subject, where the surgical instrument has a distal end portion and is operable by a surgeon during a surgery.
- the system has a probe for intra-operatively monitoring an electrophysiological condition of the living subject in the region of interest, and a controller operatively coupled with the surgical instrument and the probe, respectively.
- the controller is configured to perform during the surgery the steps of determining a variation of the electrophysiological condition of the living subject from an initial state of the living subject in the region of interest, and generating a signal to disable the surgical instrument when the variation of the electrophysiological condition is greater then a predetermined value.
- the system further has at least one of a display and an audio device for visually and/or audibly displaying the intra-operatively monitored electrophysiological condition of the living subject in the region of interest, respectively.
- the probe comprises at least one needle electrode placed in the region of interest of the living subject, and the electrophysiological condition comprises an electromyogram of electrical activities of muscles of the region of interest of the living subject.
- the probe comprises a Doppler vascular probe, and the electrophysiological condition includes a flow rate of blood vessels of the region of interest of the living subject.
- the probe has a temperature-sensing device, and the electrophysiological condition includes a temperature of tissues of the region of interest of the living subject.
- the probe has an oxygenation detector, and the electrophysiological condition comprises a venous oxygenation saturation and an arterial oxygenation saturation of the region of interest of the living subject.
- the probe in another embodiment, includes a tissue boundary detector, where the tissue boundary detector comprises at least one of an ultrasound sensing device, an infrared radiation sensing device, an ultraviolet radiation sensing device, a fluorescent radiation sensing device, and a video frame device.
- the electrophysiological condition includes a tissue type identification of tissues at the distal end portion of the surgical instrument in the region of interest of the living subject.
- the electrophysiological condition may also relate to a volume of suction from the region of interest of the living subject.
- the present invention relates to a method for selectively disabling a surgical instrument operating in a surgical site of a region of interest of a living subject, where the surgical instrument has a distal end portion and is operable by a surgeon during a surgery.
- the method includes the steps of intra-operatively monitoring the electrophysiological condition of the living subject in the region of interest, determining a variation of the electrophysiological condition of the living subject from an initial state of the living subject in the region of interest, and generating a signal to disable the surgical instrument when the variation of the electrophysiological condition is greater than a predetermined value.
- FIG. 1 shows a perspective view of a LADS according to one embodiment of the present invention: (A) the LADS dismissed, and (B) the LADS mounted to a maxilla of a human anatomy.
- FIG. 2 shows a perspective view of a fiducial frame: (A) the fiducial frame according to one embodiment of the present invention, (B) the fiducial frame according to another embodiment, and (C) the fiducial frame according to an alternative embodiment.
- FIG. 3 shows a perspective view of placing means including a LADS and a fiducial frame mounted to a skull of a human anatomy according to one embodiment of the present invention: (A) a side perspective view, and (B) a front perspective view.
- FIG. 4 shows a flowchart for selectively disabling a surgical instrument operating in a surgical site of a region of interest of a living subject according to one embodiment of the present invention.
- FIG. 5 shows schematically a system for selectively disabling a surgical instrument operating in a surgical site of a region of interest of a living subject according to one embodiment of the present invention.
- FIG. 6 shows schematically a block diagram for a system for selectively disabling a surgical instrument operating in a surgical target of a living subject according to one embodiment of the present invention.
- this invention in one aspect, relates to a system for selectively disabling a surgical instrument operating in a surgical site of a region of interest of a living subject.
- the living subject can be a human patient or an animal.
- a human patient is employed to practice the current invention, a region of interest of the patient corresponds to an ear portion of the patient, and the surgical instrument having a distal end portion and is operable by a surgeon during a surgery.
- FIG. 6 a block diagram for a system 600 is schematically shown.
- the system 600 can be utilized by at least one surgical professional 610 for operating a surgery on a surgical target, which may includes pre-operatively surgery planning, intra-operatively surgery operation and post-operatively surgery evaluation.
- the system 600 includes a surgical instrument 620 operable by the at least one surgical professional 610 for operating the surgery with respect to the surgical target 630 .
- the system 600 further has a detector 640 communicatable with the at least one surgical professional 610 , the surgical instrument 620 and the surgical target 630 , for intra-operatively detecting a visual condition of the surgical professional 610 , a location of the surgical instrument 620 , and an electrophysiological condition of the surgical target 630 , respectively.
- the system 600 has a controller 650 communicating with the detector 640 , and the surgical instrument 620 , respectively, for receiving data from the detector 640 , processing them therein and generating a signal to disable the surgical instrument 620 when a predetermined condition in the processed data is identified, as further described below.
- the controller 650 is programmable by the surgical professional 610 or other authorized users such as surgical assistants.
- the system 600 includes a display 660 communicatable with the controller 650 for intra-operatively displaying the detected visual condition of sight of the at least one surgical professional 610 , the location of the surgical instrument 620 , and the electrophysiological condition of the living subject in the surgical target 630 , respectively.
- the information on the display 660 is available to the at least one surgical professional 610 or surgical assistants.
- the system in one embodiment, includes means for noninvasively placing a number, M, of fiducial markers in an anatomic space of the ear portion of a patient.
- the placing means includes a LADS 100 (Peterman Dental Lab, Arlington, Tenn.) that is mounted onto a maxilla 180 of the patient.
- the LADS 100 is in the form of a dental bite-block that may be customizedly molded for individual maxillary dental patterns.
- the LADS 100 has a central portion 110 that imprints the lingual and occlusal surfaces of the maxillary teeth with an extension 120 at a predetermined position 130 and two lateral portions 140 a and 140 b that imprint the buccal surfaces and are attached to the central portion 110 , respectively.
- the extension 120 has mounting means 125 , which in this embodiment has one or more mounting holes formed on the extension 120 .
- the central portion 110 and lateral portions 140 a and 140 b are secured onto the maxilla 180 using one or more screws 150 that hold the lateral portions 140 a and 140 b securely with the central portion 110 in cooperation with corresponding mounting holes 125 .
- the geometry of the teeth, being narrower at the insertion into the gums, ensures a tight, reliable fit.
- a fiducial frame 200 a includes a U-shaped frame structure 210 having a first end portion 216 a and a second end portion 216 b, a first panel 220 a extending upwardly from the first end portion 216 a of the frame structure 210 , and an opposite, second panel 220 b extending upwardly from the second end portion 216 b of the frame structure 210 .
- Each of the first panel 220 a and the second panel 220 b has one or more holes formed therein for receiving corresponding marker(s) 225 .
- fiducial frame 200 a further has an engagement projection 215 located at a predetermined position in the frame structure 210 for engaging the fiducial frame 200 a to the LADS 100 through corresponding mounting means 125 .
- the fiducial frame 200 b has a frame structure 240 .
- the frame structure 240 includes a first arm 244 a, a second arm 244 b, a shoulder 242 connecting the first arm 244 a and the second arm 244 b, a first adjusting means 243 a located in the junction of the shoulder 242 and the first arm 244 a, and a second adjusting means 243 b located in the junction of the shoulder 242 and the second arm 243 b.
- the first arm 244 a has an end portion 246 a
- the second arm 244 b has an end portion 246 b.
- the fiducial frame 200 b further has a first panel 250 a and an opposite, second panels 250 b respectively extending upwardly from the end portions 246 a and 246 b of the first arm 244 a and the second arm 244 b of the frame structure 240 .
- Each of the first panel 250 a and the second panel 250 b is structured to receive several corresponding fiducial markers 255 .
- the fiducial frame 200 b further has an engagement projection 245 located at a predetermined position in the shoulder 242 of the frame structure 210 for engaging the fiducial frame 200 b to the LADS 100 through corresponding mounting means 125 .
- the size of the fiducial frame 200 b can be adjusted by the adjusting means 243 a and 243 b to accommodate skulls of varying dimensions of a living subject.
- FIG. 2C shows a fiducial frame 200 c according to an alternative embodiment of the present invention.
- the fiducial frame 200 c includes a frame structure 270 that has a shoulder 272 , a first arm 274 a and a second arm 274 b extending from the shoulder 272 , respectively.
- the first arm 274 a has an end portion 276 a
- the second arm 274 b has an end portion 276 b.
- the fiducial frame 200 c further has a first panel 280 a and an opposite, second panels 280 b respectively extending upwardly from the end portions 276 a and 276 b of the first arm 274 a and the second arm 274 b of the frame structure 270 .
- Each of the first panel 280 a and the second panel 280 b is structured to receive several corresponding fiducial markers 285 .
- the fiducial frame 200 c further has an engagement projection 275 located at a predetermined position in the shoulder 272 of the frame structure 270 for engaging the fiducial frame 200 c to the LADS 100 through corresponding mounting means 125 .
- the fiducial frame 200 c is featured at minimizing weight and optimizing the number of fiducial markers necessary to achieve sub-millimeter accuracy.
- a fiducial frame is made of materials such that the fiducial frame is considered as a rigid-body, i.e., no appreciable deformity under normal use, and has a weight minimized so as to prevent excess torques that may injure dentition.
- spun carbon fibers are used to construct the fiducial frame, which minimize weight while maximizing rigidity of the fiducial frame.
- a placing means 300 is secured to a skull 390 of a human by mounting a LADS 350 onto the maxilla.
- a fiducial frame 310 shown in FIG. 2C is attached to the LADS 350 by mounting means 355 .
- the fiducial frame 310 is configured such that when a number of fiducial markers 325 are received in the first panel 320 a and the second panel 320 b, respectively, the centroid of each fiducial marker 325 approximates a predetermined surgical site 380 in the ear portion 370 of the human and the distance between the corresponding fiducial markers 325 positioned in each of the first panel 320 a and the second panel 320 b is maximized so as to minimize a TRE.
- Rigid fixation of fiducial markers to the first panel 320 a and the second panel 320 b is advantageous because it avoids drilling into the skull.
- fiducial markers such as Acustar® of Z-Kat, Inc.
- the eighteen markers are served as fiducial markers for registration.
- the system includes an image acquisition device (not shown), such as a CT imaging scanner or a MR imaging scanner, for pre-operatively acquiring an image volume, i.e., a three-dimensional (hereinafter “3D”) radiographic image, which contains the eighteen fiducial markers from the ear portion of the patient.
- an image volume i.e., a three-dimensional (hereinafter “3D”) radiographic image
- the image volume such a CT image
- the system includes means for pre-operatively measuring a location of each fiducial marker in the anatomic space of the ear potion of the patient.
- a commercially available infrared optical tracking system (Polaris®, Northern Digital Corp., Waterloo, Canada) is employed to measure the location of each fiducial marker in the anatomic space of the ear potion of the patient.
- Other tracking systems can also be used to practice the current invention.
- the system further includes a surgical probe operatively coupled with the surgical instrument to detect a location of the distal end portion of the surgical instrument in anatomic space of the ear portion of the patient during the surgical treatment.
- the surgical probe comprises an infrared optical tracking system
- the surgical instrument includes a high-speed surgical drill fitted with infrared emitters that is visible to the infrared optical tracking system.
- system includes a controller operatively coupled with the image acquisition device, the measuring means and the surgical probe, respectively.
- the controller in one embodiment includes a computer and is configured to (i) identify a centroid of each fiducial marker in the pre-operatively acquired 3D radiographic image, for example, a CT image volume, (ii) register the identified centroid of each fiducial marker in the pre-operatively acquired 3D radiographic image to the pre-operatively measured location of the corresponding fiducial marker in the anatomic space so as to determine a registration transformation, (iii) map the intra-operatively monitored location of the distal end portion of the surgical instrument in the anatomic space onto a corresponding location in the pre-operatively acquired 3D radiographic image by an inverse of the registration transformation, and (iv) generate a signal to disable the surgical instrument when the mapped location of the distal end portion of the surgical instrument is substantially close to a boundary of the surgical site of the region of interest in the pre-operatively acquired 3D radiographic image.
- the system also includes an interlock device operatively associated with the surgical instrument and communicating with the controller.
- the interlock device in one embodiment includes an articulated/robotic arm that is programmed to control the surgical instrument to perform mastoidectomies based on pre-operative CT scans which have contoured to indicate desired surgical excavation, and disable the surgical instrument when the mapped location of the distal end portion of the surgical instrument is within a predetermined distance to the boundary of the surgical site in the region of interest in the pre-operatively acquired image volume.
- the predetermined distance to the boundary of the surgical site is about 0.5 mm.
- the system further includes an audio alarm coupled with the controller for generating an alarm when the mapped location of the surgical instrument is within a predetermined distance to the boundary of the surgical site in the acquired 3D radiographic image and a video frame coupled with the controller for displaying the precise anatomic location of the transgression as feedback to the operator.
- the system in one embodiment has two markers placed at surgically significant anatomic locations: the internal auditory canal and stylomastoid foramen of the ear portion of the patient, respectively. These two markers served as surgical targets for the purpose of estimating target registration error.
- Other anatomic landmarks which are stable and repeatably identifiable both on CT imaging scans and within the OR can also serve as surgical targets.
- the spine of Henle a small outcrop of bone in the lateral external auditory canal
- the lambda suture a junction of three boney plates visible on the surface on the skull behind the ear
- the capitulum of the stapes the top portion of the third ear bone
- the cochleaform process a small outcropping of bone into which a tendon, the tensor tympani, attaches
- the pyramidal process another small outcropping of bone into which a tendon, the stapedial, tendon attaches
- the midpoint of the subiculum a boney ridge which separates the oval window and the round window
- the neck of the malleus a relatively constant position of the first ear bone.
- the registration between the anatomic space and the CT image space is performed using various subsets of the fiducial markers. Each resulting transformation is applied to each surgical target marker in the anatomic space.
- the disparity between the transformed position and the measured position in the CT image space serves as a measure of registration error.
- Geometric arrangement of fiducial markers and their relation to target position affects error as expected from previous theoretical predictions [12]. Specifically, target registration errors are minimized with arrangement of the fiducial markers surrounding the surgical site of interest such that the centroid of the fiducial markers approximates the surgical site of interest. Also, registration accuracy is improved with the number of fiducial markers but with diminishing returns over a critical number. This becomes important in high-resolution CT scanning with the scannable volume is finite thus limiting the feasible number of markers.
- TREs with a sub-millimeter accuracy are reproducibly achievable using 5 fiducial markers surrounding the side of the surgical site of the ear portion of the patient and a single, centrally located fiducial marker balancing on the contralateral side of the ear potion of the patient for a critical number of 6 total fiducial markers. This makes image guided otologic surgery with submillimeter accuracy achievable with a minimally invasive fiducial frame.
- the present invention in another aspect, relates to a method for selectively disabling a surgical instrument operating in a surgical site of a region of interest of a patient thereof responsive to a position feedback of the surgical instrument that has a distal end portion.
- the surgical instrument can be a surgical drill, a surgical scalpel and/or a suction device operable by a surgeon during surgery such as an otologic surgery to a human patient, and the region of interest of the patient corresponds to an ear portion of the patient.
- an Institutional Review Board (Vanderbilt University, Arlington, Tenn.) approval for surgical procedures of the otologic surgery for human patients is obtained and patient consent for the otologic surgery is acquired.
- a patient-specified LADS is constructed in a dental lab, for example, Peterman Dental Lab, after maxillary impressions are taken from the patient.
- the patient-specified LADS is then attached to a fiducial frame and mounted onto the maxilla of the patient, where the fiducial frame is configured such that when the number M of fiducial markers are received therein, the centroid of each fiducial marker approximates the surgical site of the ear portion of the patient and distance between two corresponding fiducial markers is maximized so as to minimize a target registration error.
- each side of the ear portion of the patient is surrounded with nine fiducial markers.
- two surgical markers are placed in close proximity to 2 anatomically important structures, such as an internal auditory canal and a stylomastoid foramen of the ear portion of the patient.
- the method includes the following steps: at step 410 , an image volume is acquired pre-operatively from the ear portion of the patient, where the pre-operatively acquired image volume contains the image of at least two of M fiducial markers.
- three sequential CT imaging scans from the ear portion of the patient wearing the LADS and fiducial frame are taken. Other numbers of sequential CT imaging scans can also be taken.
- the fiducial frame is removed from and reattached to the LADS between two CT imaging scans. Multiple CT imaging scans are necessary in determining fiducial registration error (hereinafter “FRE”) of the image space, which is employed to determine TRE. These FREs are averaged using sum of squares to determine an average FRE.
- FRE fiducial registration error
- a centroid of each fiducial marker is identified from the pre-operatively acquired image volume.
- the image volumes (3D CT images) are reconstructed from the CT imaging scans by utilizing a high-performance computer.
- voxels i.e., a surgical site
- a surgical excavation i.e., a mastoidectomy, is pre-operatively planned based on the radiographic images.
- the LADS and the fiducial frame are removed and saved for the patient.
- the patient is re-fitted with his/her customized LADS and the fiducial frame.
- a location of each fiducial marker in an anatomic space of the ear portion of the patient is measured using an infrared optical tracking system, such as Polaris®, at step 430 .
- the identified centroid of each fiducial marker in the pre-operatively acquired image volume is registered to the pre-operatively measured location of the corresponding fiducial marker in the anatomic space at step 440 .
- the image registration determines a registration transformation and is performed by a computer in conjunction with the infrared optical tracking system and customized software.
- the registration transformation includes a rigid-body transformation.
- a location of the distal end portion of the surgical instrument in the anatomic space of the ear portion of the patient is monitored at step 450 .
- a high-speed surgical drill fitted with IR emitters is employed for the otologic surgery, and its tip location of the surgical drill is monitored by the infrared optical tracking system.
- the intra-operatively monitored location of the distal end portion of the surgical instrument in the anatomic space is mapped onto a corresponding location in the pre-operatively acquired image volume by an inverse of the registration transformation.
- the mapping step in one embodiment is performed with the computer.
- a controller such as a computer coupled with the surgical instrument, generates a signal to disable the surgical instrument at step 470 .
- the predetermined distance is about 0.5 mm.
- Software codes and electric circuits for controlling the surgical instrument in the present invention are custom-designed.
- unique to the otologic surgery is that the surgical instrument, a high-speed surgical drill, can be quickly disabled to prevent collateral damage to healthy tissues.
- the disablement includes simply turning off the rotation of the bit using active braking when the surgical instrument leaves the surgeon-identified surgical site.
- anatomically significant landmarks as described above, are intra-operatively and post-operatively acquired, respectively, in a blinded fashion, i.e., the surgeon points to a structure and an assistant acquires its position and label it. These data points are used to analyze the TRE of these anatomically significant points.
- endpoints of the surgery including (i) number of surgical transgressions beyond the safe surgical field, (ii) volume of tissues removed, and (iii) time of the surgery, are measured.
- Endpoint (i) is corresponding to an index of safety of the surgery and measured during the otologic surgery.
- Endpoint (ii) is assessed by obtaining post-surgical CT imaging scans to determine what percentage of the original planned excavation occurred.
- endpoint (iii) corresponds to the operating time of the surgery from the start to the end of the surgery.
- Endpoints (i) and (iii) are corresponding to indices of efficiency of the surgery. Statistically appropriate comparisons are made after determining the distribution of the indices of efficiency of the surgery. Analysis of the endpoint data is performed with SigmaStat® Statistical Software (SPSS Science, Inc., Chicago, Ill.).
- a system 500 has a surgical instrument 520 operating in a surgical site 530 of a region of interest of a patient.
- the surgical instrument 520 has a distal end portion 522 and is operable by a surgeon 510 during a surgery.
- the surgical instrument 520 may be a commercially available surgical drill, a surgical scalpel, a suction device such as a surgical pump or tube, or other surgical instruments and any combination of them.
- the system 500 further has an eye-tracking device 540 for intra-operatively tracking the visual line of sight 570 of the surgeon 510 and a location of the distal end portion 522 of the surgical instrument 520 in the region of interest of the patient, respectively.
- the eye-tracking device 540 includes a head-hold device, such as EyeLink® II, (SR Research, Ltd., Osgoode, Canada). Other eye-tracking devices can also be employed to practice the current invention.
- the system 500 also includes a controller 550 that is operatively coupled with the surgical instrument 520 and the eye-tracking device 540 , respectively.
- the controller 550 such as a computer, is configured to perform during the surgery the step of processing the intra-operatively tracked visual line of sight 570 of the surgeon 510 and the location of the distal end portion 522 of the surgical instrument 520 in the region of interest of the patient to determine an angle, ⁇ , between a visual path 580 connecting a predetermined point 542 of the eye-tracking device 540 and the distal end portion 522 of the surgical instrument 520 in the region of interest of the patient and the line of sight 570 of the surgeon 510 .
- the controller 550 is further configured to perform the step of generating a signal to disable the surgical instrument 520 when the angle a is larger than a predetermined angle as a threshold.
- the controller 550 is associated with a computer.
- the system 500 has a display 560 communicatable with the controller 550 and the eye-tracking device 540 for displaying the tracked line of sight 570 of the surgeon 510 and the tracked location of the distal end portion 522 of the surgical instrument 520 in the region of interest of the patient, respectively.
- the present invention in one aspect, relates to a system for selectively disabling a surgical instrument operating in a surgical site of a region of interest of a patient, where the surgical instrument has a distal end portion and is operable by a surgeon during a surgery.
- the system has a probe adapted for intra-operatively monitoring an electrophysiological condition of the patient in the region of interest, and a controller that is operatively coupled with the surgical instrument and the probe, respectively.
- the controller is further configured to perform during the surgery the steps of processing the intra-operatively monitored electrophysiological condition of the patient in the region of interest to identify a variation of the electrophysiological condition from an initial state of the patient in the region of interest, and generating a signal to disable the surgical instrument when the variation of the electrophysiological condition of the patient in the region of interest is greater than a predetermined value.
- the controller is associated with a computer.
- the probe has at least one needle electrode placed in the region of interest of the patent adapted for intra-operatively recording an electromyogram of electrical activities of muscles of the region of interest of the patient.
- the controller will generate a signal to disable the surgical instrument.
- the probe in another embodiment has a Doppler vascular probe adapted for intra-operatively monitoring a flow rate of blood vessels of the region of interest of the patient.
- the controller will generate a signal to disable the surgical instrument.
- the probe has a temperature-sensing device adapted for intra-operatively measuring a temperature of tissues of the region of interest of the patient.
- the controller will generate a signal to disable the surgical instrument.
- the probe has an oxygenation detector adapted for intra-operatively detecting a venous oxygenation saturation and an arterial oxygenation saturation of the region of interest of the patient intra-operatively monitored by the oxygenation detector.
- the controller will generate a signal to disable the surgical instrument.
- the probe in one embodiment, has a tissue boundary detector, where the tissue boundary detector includes at least one of an ultrasound sensing device, an infrared radiation sensing device, an ultraviolet radiation sensing device, a fluorescent radiation sensing device, and a video frame device.
- the tissue boundary detector is adapted for intra-operatively identifying a tissue type of tissues at the distal end portion of the surgical instrument in the region of interest of the patient. When the tissue type of tissues at the distal end portion of the surgical instrument is changed, the controller will generate a signal to disable the surgical instrument.
- the present invention discloses a system and method for selectively disabling a surgical instrument operating in a surgical site of a region of interest of a living subject, in response to a position feedback of the surgical instrument, an electrophysiological condition of the living subject in a region of interest, and a visual condition of sight of a surgeon who operates a surgery, respectively.
- Gering DT Nabavi A, Kikinis R, Hata N, O'Donnell L J, Grimson W E, Jolesz F A, Black P M, Wells W M 3 rd , An integrated visualization system for surgical planning and guidance using image fusion and an open MR, J Magn Reson Imaging 2001 Jun; 13(6):967-75.
Abstract
A system for selectively disabling a surgical instrument operating in a surgical site of a region of interest of a living subject. In one embodiment, the system includes means for noninvasively placing a number of fiducial markers in an anatomic space of the region of interest of the living subject, means for pre-operatively measuring a location of each fiducial marker in the anatomic space, an imaging acquisition device for pre-operatively acquiring an image volume from the region of interest of the living subject, a probe for intra-operatively monitoring a location of the surgical instrument in the anatomic space, and a controller configured to perform the steps of identifying a centroid of each fiducial marker in the image volume, registering the identified centroid of each fiducial marker in the image volume to the measured location of the corresponding fiducial marker in the anatomic space to determine a registration transformation, mapping the monitored location of the surgical instrument in the anatomic space onto a corresponding location in the image volume by an inverse of the registration transformation, and generating a signal to disable the surgical instrument when the mapped location of the surgical instrument is substantially close to a boundary of the surgical site of the region of interest in the image volume.
Description
- This application claims the benefit, pursuant to 35 U.S.C. §119(e), of provisional U.S. patent application Ser. No. 60/555,377, filed Mar. 22, 2004, entitled “SURGICAL INSTRUMENT DISABLEMENT VIA IMAGE-GUIDED POSITION FEEDBACK,” by Robert F. Labadie, and J. Michael Fitzpatrick, which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
- Some references, which may include patents, patent applications and various publications, are cited and discussed in the description of this invention. The citation and/or discussion of such references is provided merely to clarify the description of the present invention and is not an admission that any such reference is “prior art” to the invention described herein. All references cited and discussed in this specification are incorporated herein by reference in their entireties and to the same extent as if each reference was individually incorporated by reference. In terms of notation, hereinafter, “[n]” represents the nth reference cited in the reference list. For example, [7] represents the 7th reference cited in the reference list, namely, West J B, Fitzpatrick J M, Toms S, Maurer, Jr, and Maciunas R J. Fiducial point placement and the accuracy of point-based, rigid-body registration. Neurosurgery 48: 810-817, 2001.
- The present invention was made with Government support under a contract R21 EB02886-02 awarded by National Institutes of Health. The United States Government may have certain rights to this invention pursuant to these grants.
- The present invention generally relates to a computer-assisted surgery and in particular to the utilization of a feedback trigger during a surgery to selectively disable a surgical instrument operating in a region of interest of a living subject.
- Radiographic imaging is often imperative for the pre-operative planning of surgical treatments for patients. Plain X-rays, computed tomography (hereinafter “CT”) images, and magnetic resonance (hereinafter “MR”) images facilitate surgical navigations. Because on their usefulness, surgeons have sought innovative ways to further incorporate radiographic imaging into the surgical suite. For years, orthopedic and vascular surgeons have relied upon intra-operative, real-time fluoroscopy, such as plain X-rays, to assess surgical treatments. More recently, real-time MR [1] and CT imaging surgical suites have been constructed where intra-operative MR or CT image is continuously updated displaying anatomic changes due to surgical treatment. These systems have found limited use due to logistic difficulties including the exorbitant cost of a dedicated CT or MR imaging system in an operative suite and the physically confined environment in which a surgeon operates.
- A more feasible option has been the use of pre-operative CT and/or MR images in an image-guided surgery (hereinafter “IGS”) where anatomic locations are continuously updated on the per-operative CT and/or MR images as specified by a surgical probe. The concept of the image-guided surgery dated back to the 1940's [3]. However, widespread acceptance of the concept did not occur until radiographic advances in the 1970's that made CT and MR images routinely available. Image-guided surgical systems, which are analogous to global-positioning systems (hereinafter “GPS”), have since found widespread use in neurosurgery [4] and sinus surgery [5]. In general, An IGS system includes a pre-operative radiographic image (CT or MR image) that is acquired from a patient and digitized and stored on a computer. Within the operating room (hereinafter “OR”), the pre-operative radiographic image are registered to the anesthetized patient by correlating landmarks found on the pre-operative radiographic image with the landmarks on the anesthetized patient. Typical landmarks used for registration are anatomic points and/or fiducial markers attached to the skin or implanted in bone of a patient. Registration creates a transformation matrix that allows a direct mapping of the patient's current anatomy to the corresponding pre-operative radiographic image. Once registration has taken place, for example, using an electronically visible probe, such as infrared optical system and/or electromagnetic system, to detect a location of each fiducial marker in the patient, i.e., the physical space, that is registered to in a radiographic image space. The probe can be used as a pointer to identify surgical anatomy on CT or MR images.
- Crucial to limiting error in IGS systems is registration of the pre-operative radiographic image to the surgical field of interest in the anesthetized patient.
- Registration landmarks, for example, anatomic landmarks and/or fiducial markers, need to be immobile relative to the anatomy and arranged such that they surround the surgical field of interest. While multiple anatomic landmarks would initially appear useful, soft tissue, for instance, skin and muscle, relaxes and distorts under general anesthesia making boney landmarks necessary for accurate registration. A solution has been to implant markers into bone of a patient. This is routinely used in neurosurgery where screws are placed into the cranium prior to pre-operative radiographic imaging and these screws serve as landmarks for registration. While accuracy with such systems is impressive [6, 7], it does involve the invasive placement of bone screws with small, yet real, risk of infection and cosmetic deformity. Another solution is to use skin markers or skin contours. Such systems have shown decreased accuracy that is unacceptable in otologic applications [8].
- The most common ear disorders of human being that require surgical treatments are chronic serous otitis media (hereinafter “CSOM”) and cholesteatoma. The CSOM is characterized by inflammation of the mucous membrane lining the middle ear that does not respond to medical therapy. The cholesteatoma contains keratinizing squamous epithelium (skin) trapped within the middle ear cavity and leads to chronic infection, hearing loss, facial nerve paralysis, and vertigo. Both the CSOM and cholesteatoma are usually treated by an otologic surgery, for example, through a mastoidectomy, to remove diseased tissues from the temporal bone encasing the ear using a surgical drill and/or knife. As a result, adjacent structures surrounding the surgical site of the temporal bone, such as the facial nerve, the inner ear, the floor of the cranial vault, the internal jugular vein and the carotid artery, are at great risk during the surgical treatment.
- It has been shown that IGS systems can improve overall standards of surgical treatments in both neurosurgery and sinus surgery. Specifically, IGS systems have improved surgical accuracy and reduce the risk of major complications in sinus surgery [9], and decreased operative time for neurosurgical procedures thus cutting costs [10]. In addition, patients treated with an IGS have more complete resection of diseased tissues with less collateral damage to healthy tissues [11] than that treated with a traditional surgery. It is anticipated that such advantages of the IGS systems would be also applicable to an otologic surgery. Epidemiologic and economic data supports the usefulness of an IGS in otologic procedures. However, applications have been limited by the need for millimeter and sub-millimeter accuracies to prevent injury to adjacent structures, such as the facial nerve and the inner ear. Therefore, a heretofore unaddressed need still exists in the art to address the aforementioned deficiencies and inadequacies.
- The present invention, in one aspect, relates to a system for selectively disabling a surgical instrument operating in a surgical site of a region of interest of a living subject, where the surgical instrument has a distal end portion. The present invention can be practiced with respect to several surgical instruments and any combinations of them. As non-limiting examples, the surgical instrument can be a drill, and the distal end portion of the surgical instrument is the tip of the drill. The surgical instrument can be a surgical scalpel, and the distal end portion of the surgical instrument is the cutting portion of the surgical scalpel. The surgical instrument can also be a suction device, and the distal end portion of the surgical instrument is the sucking portion of the suction device. The region of interest of the living subject may correspond to an ear portion, a mouth portion, a head portion, or other body portions of the living subject.
- In one embodiment, the system includes means for noninvasively placing a number, M, of fiducial markers in an anatomic space of the region of interest of the living subject. The placing means has a locking dental acrylic resin splint (hereinafter “LADS”) mountable to a maxilla of the living subject, where the LADS includes a central portion with an extension at a predetermined position, and two lateral portions attached to the central portion. The placing means further has a fiducial frame attachable to the LADS by the extension for receiving the number M of fiducial markers. The fiducial frame comprises a frame structure, a first panel and an opposite, second panel extending upwardly from the frame structure, each of the first panel and the second panel defining a number of holes for receiving a corresponding number of fiducial markers. The fiducial frame is configured such that when the number M of fiducial markers are received therein, the centroid of each fiducial marker approximates the surgical site of the ear portion of the living subject and distance between at least one pair of two corresponding fiducial markers is maximized so as to minimize a target registration error.
- The system further includes means for pre-operatively measuring a location of each fiducial marker in the anatomic space of the region of interest of the living subject, an imaging acquisition device for pre-operatively acquiring an image volume from the region of interest of the living subject, where the pre-operatively acquired image volume includes the image of at least two of M fiducial markers, and a probe operatively coupled with the surgical instrument for intra-operatively monitoring a location of the distal end portion of the surgical instrument in the anatomic space of the region of interest of the living subject. Moreover, the system includes a controller operatively coupled with the measuring means, the imaging acquisition device, the probe, and the surgical instrument, respectively. The controller is configured to perform the steps of identifying a centroid of each fiducial marker in the pre-operatively acquired image volume, registering the identified centroid of each fiducial marker in the pre-operatively acquired image volume to the pre-operatively measured location of the corresponding fiducial marker in the anatomic space so as to determine a registration transformation, mapping the intra-operatively monitored location of the distal end portion of the surgical instrument in the anatomic space onto a corresponding location in the pre-operatively acquired image volume by an inverse of the registration transformation, and generating a signal to disable the surgical instrument when the mapped location of the distal end portion of the surgical instrument is substantially close to a boundary of the surgical site of the region of interest in the pre-operatively acquired image volume. Furthermore, the system includes a number, N, of surgical markers, each placed in a surgically significant anatomic location serving as a registration target.
- Moreover, the system has an alarm device communicating with the controller for generating an alarm when the mapped location of the distal end portion of the surgical instrument is within a predetermined distance to the boundary of the surgical site in the region of interest in the pre-operatively acquired image volume. Additionally, the system includes an interlock device operatively associated with the surgical instrument and communicating with the controller, where the interlock device disables the surgical instrument when the mapped location of the distal end portion of the surgical instrument is within a predetermined distance to the boundary of the surgical site in the region of interest in the pre-operatively acquired image volume.
- In another aspect, the present invention relates to a method for selectively disabling a surgical instrument operating in a surgical site of a region of interest of a living subject, where the surgical instrument has a distal end portion, the region of interest of the living subject is surrounded with a plurality of markers. The plurality of markers includes a number, M, of fiducial markers determining an image registration and a number, N, of surgical markers with each surgical marker placed in a surgically significant anatomic location serving as a registration target. The region of interest of the living subject corresponds to an ear portion of the living subject.
- In one embodiment, the method includes the step of pre-operatively acquiring an image volume from the region of interest of the living subject, where the pre-operatively acquired image volume contains the image of at least two of M fiducial markers. Furthermore, the method has the steps of identifying a centroid of each fiducial marker from the pre-operatively acquired image volume, pre-operatively measuring a location of each fiducial marker in an anatomic space of the region of interest of the living subject, registering the identified centroid of each fiducial marker in the pre-operatively acquired image volume to the pre-operatively measured location of the corresponding fiducial marker in the anatomic space so as to determine a registration transformation, intra-operatively monitoring a location of the distal end portion of the surgical instrument in the anatomic space of the region of interest of the living subject, and mapping the intra-operatively monitored location of the distal end portion of the surgical instrument in the anatomic space onto a corresponding location in the pre-operatively acquired image volume by an inverse of the registration transformation. Moreover, the method includes the step of generating a signal to disable the surgical instrument when the mapped location of the distal end portion of the surgical instrument is substantially close to a boundary of the surgical site of the region of interest of the living subject in the pre-operatively acquired image volume.
- In one embodiment, the method further has the step of mounting an LADS with an attached fiducial frame onto a maxilla of the living subject, where the fiducial frame is configured such that when the number M of fiducial markers are received therein, the centroid of each fiducial marker approximates the surgical site of the ear portion of the living subject and distance between at least one pair of two corresponding fiducial markers is maximized so as to minimize a target registration error. Additionally, the method has the step of generating an alarm when the mapped location of the surgical instrument is within a predetermined distance to the boundary of the surgical site in the pre-operatively acquired image volume.
- In yet another aspect, the present invention relates to a system for selectively disabling a surgical instrument operating in a surgical site of a region of interest of a living subject, where the surgical instrument has a distal end portion and is operable by a surgeon during a surgery. In one embodiment, the system has an eye-tracking device operatively coupled with the surgical instrument for intra-operatively tracking the visual line of sight of the surgeon and a location of the distal end portion of the surgical instrument in the region of interest of the living subject, respectively, and a controller operatively coupled with the surgical instrument and the eye-tracking device, respectively. The controller is configured to perform during the surgery the steps of determining an angle between a visual path connecting a predetermined point of the eye-tracking device and the distal end portion of the surgical instrument in the region of interest of the living subject and the line of sight of the surgeon, and generating a signal to disable the surgical instrument when the angle is larger than a predetermined angle. In one embodiment, the eye-tracking device includes a head-hold device and has a sensor.
- The system, in one embodiment, has a display communicating with the controller and the eye-tracking device for displaying the tracked line of sight of the surgeon and the tracked location of the distal end portion of the surgical instrument in the region of interest of the living subject, respectively.
- In a further aspect, the present invention relates to a method for selectively disabling a surgical instrument operating in a surgical site of a region of interest of a living subject, where the surgical instrument has a distal end portion and is operable by a surgeon during a surgery. In one embodiment, the method includes the steps of intra-operatively tracking the visual line of sight of the surgeon and a location of the distal end portion of the surgical instrument in the region of interest of the living subject, respectively, determining an angle between a visual path connecting a predetermined point of the eye-tracking device and the distal end portion of the surgical instrument in the region of interest of the living subject and the line of sight of the surgeon, and generating a signal to disable the surgical instrument when the angle is larger than a predetermined angle.
- In yet a further aspect, the present invention relates to a system for selectively disabling a surgical instrument operating in a surgical site of a region of interest of a living subject, where the surgical instrument has a distal end portion and is operable by a surgeon during a surgery. In one embodiment, the system has a probe for intra-operatively monitoring an electrophysiological condition of the living subject in the region of interest, and a controller operatively coupled with the surgical instrument and the probe, respectively. The controller is configured to perform during the surgery the steps of determining a variation of the electrophysiological condition of the living subject from an initial state of the living subject in the region of interest, and generating a signal to disable the surgical instrument when the variation of the electrophysiological condition is greater then a predetermined value.
- The system further has at least one of a display and an audio device for visually and/or audibly displaying the intra-operatively monitored electrophysiological condition of the living subject in the region of interest, respectively.
- In one embodiment, the probe comprises at least one needle electrode placed in the region of interest of the living subject, and the electrophysiological condition comprises an electromyogram of electrical activities of muscles of the region of interest of the living subject. In another embodiment, the probe comprises a Doppler vascular probe, and the electrophysiological condition includes a flow rate of blood vessels of the region of interest of the living subject. In an alternative embodiment, the probe has a temperature-sensing device, and the electrophysiological condition includes a temperature of tissues of the region of interest of the living subject. In one embodiment, the probe has an oxygenation detector, and the electrophysiological condition comprises a venous oxygenation saturation and an arterial oxygenation saturation of the region of interest of the living subject. In another embodiment, the probe includes a tissue boundary detector, where the tissue boundary detector comprises at least one of an ultrasound sensing device, an infrared radiation sensing device, an ultraviolet radiation sensing device, a fluorescent radiation sensing device, and a video frame device. The electrophysiological condition includes a tissue type identification of tissues at the distal end portion of the surgical instrument in the region of interest of the living subject. The electrophysiological condition may also relate to a volume of suction from the region of interest of the living subject.
- In one aspect, the present invention relates to a method for selectively disabling a surgical instrument operating in a surgical site of a region of interest of a living subject, where the surgical instrument has a distal end portion and is operable by a surgeon during a surgery. In one embodiment, the method includes the steps of intra-operatively monitoring the electrophysiological condition of the living subject in the region of interest, determining a variation of the electrophysiological condition of the living subject from an initial state of the living subject in the region of interest, and generating a signal to disable the surgical instrument when the variation of the electrophysiological condition is greater than a predetermined value.
- These and other aspects of the present invention will become apparent from the following description of the preferred embodiment taken in conjunction with the following drawings, although variations and modifications therein may be affected without departing from the spirit and scope of the novel concepts of the disclosure.
-
FIG. 1 shows a perspective view of a LADS according to one embodiment of the present invention: (A) the LADS dismissed, and (B) the LADS mounted to a maxilla of a human anatomy. -
FIG. 2 shows a perspective view of a fiducial frame: (A) the fiducial frame according to one embodiment of the present invention, (B) the fiducial frame according to another embodiment, and (C) the fiducial frame according to an alternative embodiment. -
FIG. 3 shows a perspective view of placing means including a LADS and a fiducial frame mounted to a skull of a human anatomy according to one embodiment of the present invention: (A) a side perspective view, and (B) a front perspective view. -
FIG. 4 shows a flowchart for selectively disabling a surgical instrument operating in a surgical site of a region of interest of a living subject according to one embodiment of the present invention. -
FIG. 5 shows schematically a system for selectively disabling a surgical instrument operating in a surgical site of a region of interest of a living subject according to one embodiment of the present invention. -
FIG. 6 shows schematically a block diagram for a system for selectively disabling a surgical instrument operating in a surgical target of a living subject according to one embodiment of the present invention. - The present invention is more particularly described in the following examples that are intended as illustrative only since numerous modifications and variations therein will be apparent to those skilled in the art. Various embodiments of the invention are now described in detail. Referring to the drawings, like numbers indicate like parts throughout the views. As used in the description herein and throughout the claims that follow, the meaning of “a,” “an,” and “the” includes plural reference unless the context clearly dictates otherwise. Also, as used in the description herein and throughout the claims that follow, the meaning of “in” includes “in” and “on” unless the context clearly dictates otherwise.
- The description will be made as to the embodiments of the present invention in conjunction with the accompanying drawings 1-6. In accordance with the purposes of this invention, as embodied and broadly described herein, this invention, in one aspect, relates to a system for selectively disabling a surgical instrument operating in a surgical site of a region of interest of a living subject. The living subject can be a human patient or an animal. In one embodiment, a human patient is employed to practice the current invention, a region of interest of the patient corresponds to an ear portion of the patient, and the surgical instrument having a distal end portion and is operable by a surgeon during a surgery.
- Referring first to
FIG. 6 , a block diagram for asystem 600 is schematically shown. In general, thesystem 600 can be utilized by at least one surgical professional 610 for operating a surgery on a surgical target, which may includes pre-operatively surgery planning, intra-operatively surgery operation and post-operatively surgery evaluation. Thesystem 600 includes asurgical instrument 620 operable by the at least one surgical professional 610 for operating the surgery with respect to thesurgical target 630. Thesystem 600 further has adetector 640 communicatable with the at least one surgical professional 610, thesurgical instrument 620 and thesurgical target 630, for intra-operatively detecting a visual condition of the surgical professional 610, a location of thesurgical instrument 620, and an electrophysiological condition of thesurgical target 630, respectively. Moreover, thesystem 600 has acontroller 650 communicating with thedetector 640, and thesurgical instrument 620, respectively, for receiving data from thedetector 640, processing them therein and generating a signal to disable thesurgical instrument 620 when a predetermined condition in the processed data is identified, as further described below. Thecontroller 650 is programmable by the surgical professional 610 or other authorized users such as surgical assistants. Furthermore, thesystem 600 includes adisplay 660 communicatable with thecontroller 650 for intra-operatively displaying the detected visual condition of sight of the at least one surgical professional 610, the location of thesurgical instrument 620, and the electrophysiological condition of the living subject in thesurgical target 630, respectively. The information on thedisplay 660 is available to the at least one surgical professional 610 or surgical assistants. - Specifically, the system, in one embodiment, includes means for noninvasively placing a number, M, of fiducial markers in an anatomic space of the ear portion of a patient. Referring in general to
FIGS. 1-3 , and in particular toFIG. 1 , the placing means includes a LADS 100 (Peterman Dental Lab, Nashville, Tenn.) that is mounted onto amaxilla 180 of the patient. TheLADS 100 is in the form of a dental bite-block that may be customizedly molded for individual maxillary dental patterns. TheLADS 100 has acentral portion 110 that imprints the lingual and occlusal surfaces of the maxillary teeth with anextension 120 at apredetermined position 130 and twolateral portions central portion 110, respectively. Theextension 120 has mounting means 125, which in this embodiment has one or more mounting holes formed on theextension 120. Thecentral portion 110 andlateral portions maxilla 180 using one ormore screws 150 that hold thelateral portions central portion 110 in cooperation with corresponding mounting holes 125. The geometry of the teeth, being narrower at the insertion into the gums, ensures a tight, reliable fit. - The placing means further includes a fiducial frame that is attached to the LADS by the extension for receiving the number M of fiducial markers. Referring now to
FIG. 2A , in one embodiment, afiducial frame 200 a includes aU-shaped frame structure 210 having afirst end portion 216 a and asecond end portion 216 b, afirst panel 220 a extending upwardly from thefirst end portion 216 a of theframe structure 210, and an opposite,second panel 220 b extending upwardly from thesecond end portion 216 b of theframe structure 210. Each of thefirst panel 220 a and thesecond panel 220 b has one or more holes formed therein for receiving corresponding marker(s) 225. In one embodiment, commercially available markers 225 (Acustar®, Z-Kat, Inc., Hollywood, Fla.) are received into the holes and mounted on thefirst panel 220 a and thesecond panel 220 b of thefiducial frame 200 a, respectively. Thefiducial frame 200 a further has anengagement projection 215 located at a predetermined position in theframe structure 210 for engaging thefiducial frame 200 a to theLADS 100 through corresponding mounting means 125. - Referring to
FIG. 2B , afiducial frame 200 b is shown according to another embodiment of the present invention. Thefiducial frame 200 b has aframe structure 240. Theframe structure 240 includes afirst arm 244 a, asecond arm 244 b, ashoulder 242 connecting thefirst arm 244 a and thesecond arm 244 b, a first adjusting means 243 a located in the junction of theshoulder 242 and thefirst arm 244 a, and a second adjusting means 243 b located in the junction of theshoulder 242 and thesecond arm 243 b. Thefirst arm 244 a has anend portion 246 a, and thesecond arm 244 b has anend portion 246 b. Thefiducial frame 200 b further has afirst panel 250 a and an opposite,second panels 250 b respectively extending upwardly from theend portions first arm 244 a and thesecond arm 244 b of theframe structure 240. Each of thefirst panel 250 a and thesecond panel 250 b is structured to receive several correspondingfiducial markers 255. Thefiducial frame 200 b further has anengagement projection 245 located at a predetermined position in theshoulder 242 of theframe structure 210 for engaging thefiducial frame 200 b to theLADS 100 through corresponding mounting means 125. In this embodiment, the size of thefiducial frame 200 b can be adjusted by the adjusting means 243 a and 243 b to accommodate skulls of varying dimensions of a living subject. -
FIG. 2C shows afiducial frame 200 c according to an alternative embodiment of the present invention. Thefiducial frame 200 c includes aframe structure 270 that has ashoulder 272, afirst arm 274 a and asecond arm 274 b extending from theshoulder 272, respectively. Thefirst arm 274 a has anend portion 276 a, and thesecond arm 274 b has anend portion 276 b. Thefiducial frame 200 c further has afirst panel 280 a and an opposite,second panels 280 b respectively extending upwardly from theend portions first arm 274 a and thesecond arm 274 b of theframe structure 270. Each of thefirst panel 280 a and thesecond panel 280 b is structured to receive several correspondingfiducial markers 285. Thefiducial frame 200 c further has anengagement projection 275 located at a predetermined position in theshoulder 272 of theframe structure 270 for engaging thefiducial frame 200 c to theLADS 100 through corresponding mounting means 125. Thefiducial frame 200 c is featured at minimizing weight and optimizing the number of fiducial markers necessary to achieve sub-millimeter accuracy. - A fiducial frame is made of materials such that the fiducial frame is considered as a rigid-body, i.e., no appreciable deformity under normal use, and has a weight minimized so as to prevent excess torques that may injure dentition. In one embodiment, spun carbon fibers are used to construct the fiducial frame, which minimize weight while maximizing rigidity of the fiducial frame.
- Referring to
FIGS. 3A and 3B , a placing means 300 is secured to askull 390 of a human by mounting aLADS 350 onto the maxilla. In this embodiment, afiducial frame 310 shown inFIG. 2C is attached to theLADS 350 by mountingmeans 355. - The
fiducial frame 310 is configured such that when a number offiducial markers 325 are received in thefirst panel 320 a and thesecond panel 320 b, respectively, the centroid of eachfiducial marker 325 approximates a predeterminedsurgical site 380 in theear portion 370 of the human and the distance between the correspondingfiducial markers 325 positioned in each of thefirst panel 320 a and thesecond panel 320 b is maximized so as to minimize a TRE. Rigid fixation of fiducial markers to thefirst panel 320 a and thesecond panel 320 b is advantageous because it avoids drilling into the skull. In one embodiment, nine fiducial markers, such as Acustar® of Z-Kat, Inc., are received in each of thefirst panel 320 a and thesecond panel 320 b of thefiducial frame 310. The eighteen markers are served as fiducial markers for registration. - Furthermore, the system includes an image acquisition device (not shown), such as a CT imaging scanner or a MR imaging scanner, for pre-operatively acquiring an image volume, i.e., a three-dimensional (hereinafter “3D”) radiographic image, which contains the eighteen fiducial markers from the ear portion of the patient. In one embodiment, the image volume, such a CT image, is acquired using clinically applicable, temporal-bone algorithms with scan thickness of about 0.5 mm. Moreover, the system includes means for pre-operatively measuring a location of each fiducial marker in the anatomic space of the ear potion of the patient. In one embodiment, a commercially available infrared optical tracking system (Polaris®, Northern Digital Corp., Waterloo, Canada) is employed to measure the location of each fiducial marker in the anatomic space of the ear potion of the patient. Other tracking systems can also be used to practice the current invention. The system further includes a surgical probe operatively coupled with the surgical instrument to detect a location of the distal end portion of the surgical instrument in anatomic space of the ear portion of the patient during the surgical treatment. In one embodiment, the surgical probe comprises an infrared optical tracking system, and the surgical instrument includes a high-speed surgical drill fitted with infrared emitters that is visible to the infrared optical tracking system.
- Additionally, the system includes a controller operatively coupled with the image acquisition device, the measuring means and the surgical probe, respectively.
- The controller in one embodiment includes a computer and is configured to (i) identify a centroid of each fiducial marker in the pre-operatively acquired 3D radiographic image, for example, a CT image volume, (ii) register the identified centroid of each fiducial marker in the pre-operatively acquired 3D radiographic image to the pre-operatively measured location of the corresponding fiducial marker in the anatomic space so as to determine a registration transformation, (iii) map the intra-operatively monitored location of the distal end portion of the surgical instrument in the anatomic space onto a corresponding location in the pre-operatively acquired 3D radiographic image by an inverse of the registration transformation, and (iv) generate a signal to disable the surgical instrument when the mapped location of the distal end portion of the surgical instrument is substantially close to a boundary of the surgical site of the region of interest in the pre-operatively acquired 3D radiographic image.
- In one embodiment, the system also includes an interlock device operatively associated with the surgical instrument and communicating with the controller. The interlock device in one embodiment includes an articulated/robotic arm that is programmed to control the surgical instrument to perform mastoidectomies based on pre-operative CT scans which have contoured to indicate desired surgical excavation, and disable the surgical instrument when the mapped location of the distal end portion of the surgical instrument is within a predetermined distance to the boundary of the surgical site in the region of interest in the pre-operatively acquired image volume. In one embodiment, the predetermined distance to the boundary of the surgical site is about 0.5 mm.
- The system further includes an audio alarm coupled with the controller for generating an alarm when the mapped location of the surgical instrument is within a predetermined distance to the boundary of the surgical site in the acquired 3D radiographic image and a video frame coupled with the controller for displaying the precise anatomic location of the transgression as feedback to the operator.
- Additionally, the system in one embodiment has two markers placed at surgically significant anatomic locations: the internal auditory canal and stylomastoid foramen of the ear portion of the patient, respectively. These two markers served as surgical targets for the purpose of estimating target registration error. Other anatomic landmarks which are stable and repeatably identifiable both on CT imaging scans and within the OR can also serve as surgical targets. They are any and/or all of the following: (i) the spine of Henle—a small outcrop of bone in the lateral external auditory canal, (ii) the lambda suture—a junction of three boney plates visible on the surface on the skull behind the ear, (iii) the capitulum of the stapes—the top portion of the third ear bone, (iv) the cochleaform process—a small outcropping of bone into which a tendon, the tensor tympani, attaches, (v) the pyramidal process—another small outcropping of bone into which a tendon, the stapedial, tendon attaches, (vi) the midpoint of the subiculum—a boney ridge which separates the oval window and the round window, and (vii) the neck of the malleus, a relatively constant position of the first ear bone.
- The registration between the anatomic space and the CT image space is performed using various subsets of the fiducial markers. Each resulting transformation is applied to each surgical target marker in the anatomic space. The disparity between the transformed position and the measured position in the CT image space serves as a measure of registration error. Geometric arrangement of fiducial markers and their relation to target position affects error as expected from previous theoretical predictions [12]. Specifically, target registration errors are minimized with arrangement of the fiducial markers surrounding the surgical site of interest such that the centroid of the fiducial markers approximates the surgical site of interest. Also, registration accuracy is improved with the number of fiducial markers but with diminishing returns over a critical number. This becomes important in high-resolution CT scanning with the scannable volume is finite thus limiting the feasible number of markers. In one embodiment, with all 18 fiducial markers used for registration, that is each side of the ear portion of the patent has 9 fiducial markers, which are received in a first panel and a second panel of a fiducial frame, respectively, TRE for the surgically significant anatomic locations including an internal auditory canal and a stylomastoid foramen are TRE1=0.41 mm and TRE2=0.90 mm, respectively. In another embodiment, surrounding the side of interest, where a surgical site is located, of the ear portion of the patent with 9 markers and balancing this with a single, centrally placed marker on the contralateral side of the ear portion of the patient produces similar results with TRE1=0.52 mm and TRE2=0.90 mm. However, for an inverse situation, that is, surrounding the contralateral side of the surgical site of the ear portion of the patient with 9 fiducial markers and balancing the side of the surgical site of the ear portion of the patient with a single marker, it produces worse results with TRE1=1.26 mm and TRE2=1.80 mm for the internal auditory canal and stylomastoid foramen targets, respectively. These are the largest registration target errors occurred among 17 different configurations of 18 fiducial markers. TREs with a sub-millimeter accuracy (<1 mm) are reproducibly achievable using 5 fiducial markers surrounding the side of the surgical site of the ear portion of the patient and a single, centrally located fiducial marker balancing on the contralateral side of the ear potion of the patient for a critical number of 6 total fiducial markers. This makes image guided otologic surgery with submillimeter accuracy achievable with a minimally invasive fiducial frame.
- The present invention, in another aspect, relates to a method for selectively disabling a surgical instrument operating in a surgical site of a region of interest of a patient thereof responsive to a position feedback of the surgical instrument that has a distal end portion. For example, the surgical instrument can be a surgical drill, a surgical scalpel and/or a suction device operable by a surgeon during surgery such as an otologic surgery to a human patient, and the region of interest of the patient corresponds to an ear portion of the patient. Prior to the otologic surgery, an Institutional Review Board (Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tenn.) approval for surgical procedures of the otologic surgery for human patients is obtained and patient consent for the otologic surgery is acquired. A patient-specified LADS is constructed in a dental lab, for example, Peterman Dental Lab, after maxillary impressions are taken from the patient. The patient-specified LADS is then attached to a fiducial frame and mounted onto the maxilla of the patient, where the fiducial frame is configured such that when the number M of fiducial markers are received therein, the centroid of each fiducial marker approximates the surgical site of the ear portion of the patient and distance between two corresponding fiducial markers is maximized so as to minimize a target registration error. In one embodiment, each side of the ear portion of the patient is surrounded with nine fiducial markers. In addition, two surgical markers are placed in close proximity to 2 anatomically important structures, such as an internal auditory canal and a stylomastoid foramen of the ear portion of the patient.
- In one embodiment, the method, as shown in
FIG. 4 , includes the following steps: atstep 410, an image volume is acquired pre-operatively from the ear portion of the patient, where the pre-operatively acquired image volume contains the image of at least two of M fiducial markers. In one embodiment, three sequential CT imaging scans from the ear portion of the patient wearing the LADS and fiducial frame are taken. Other numbers of sequential CT imaging scans can also be taken. The fiducial frame is removed from and reattached to the LADS between two CT imaging scans. Multiple CT imaging scans are necessary in determining fiducial registration error (hereinafter “FRE”) of the image space, which is employed to determine TRE. These FREs are averaged using sum of squares to determine an average FRE. Atstep 420, a centroid of each fiducial marker is identified from the pre-operatively acquired image volume. In one embodiment, the image volumes (3D CT images) are reconstructed from the CT imaging scans by utilizing a high-performance computer. On these reconstructed image volumes, voxels (i.e., a surgical site) that lie within the ear portion of the patient are selected by the surgeon. In other words, a surgical excavation, i.e., a mastoidectomy, is pre-operatively planned based on the radiographic images. - After pre-operatively acquiring image volumes of the patient, the LADS and the fiducial frame are removed and saved for the patient. In the OR, after performing a general anesthesia, the patient is re-fitted with his/her customized LADS and the fiducial frame. A location of each fiducial marker in an anatomic space of the ear portion of the patient is measured using an infrared optical tracking system, such as Polaris®, at
step 430. The identified centroid of each fiducial marker in the pre-operatively acquired image volume is registered to the pre-operatively measured location of the corresponding fiducial marker in the anatomic space atstep 440. The image registration determines a registration transformation and is performed by a computer in conjunction with the infrared optical tracking system and customized software. The registration transformation, in one embodiment, includes a rigid-body transformation. During the surgery, a location of the distal end portion of the surgical instrument in the anatomic space of the ear portion of the patient is monitored atstep 450. In one embodiment, a high-speed surgical drill fitted with IR emitters is employed for the otologic surgery, and its tip location of the surgical drill is monitored by the infrared optical tracking system. Atstep 460, the intra-operatively monitored location of the distal end portion of the surgical instrument in the anatomic space is mapped onto a corresponding location in the pre-operatively acquired image volume by an inverse of the registration transformation. The mapping step in one embodiment is performed with the computer. When the mapped location of the surgical instrument is within a predetermined distance to the boundary of the surgical site in the pre-operatively acquired image volume, a controller, such as a computer coupled with the surgical instrument, generates a signal to disable the surgical instrument atstep 470. In one embodiment, the predetermined distance is about 0.5 mm. Software codes and electric circuits for controlling the surgical instrument in the present invention are custom-designed. In the present invention, among other things, unique to the otologic surgery is that the surgical instrument, a high-speed surgical drill, can be quickly disabled to prevent collateral damage to healthy tissues. The disablement includes simply turning off the rotation of the bit using active braking when the surgical instrument leaves the surgeon-identified surgical site. - According to one embodiment of the current invention, anatomically significant landmarks, as described above, are intra-operatively and post-operatively acquired, respectively, in a blinded fashion, i.e., the surgeon points to a structure and an assistant acquires its position and label it. These data points are used to analyze the TRE of these anatomically significant points.
- In addition, three endpoints of the surgery including (i) number of surgical transgressions beyond the safe surgical field, (ii) volume of tissues removed, and (iii) time of the surgery, are measured. Endpoint (i) is corresponding to an index of safety of the surgery and measured during the otologic surgery. Endpoint (ii) is assessed by obtaining post-surgical CT imaging scans to determine what percentage of the original planned excavation occurred. And endpoint (iii) corresponds to the operating time of the surgery from the start to the end of the surgery. Endpoints (i) and (iii) are corresponding to indices of efficiency of the surgery. Statistically appropriate comparisons are made after determining the distribution of the indices of efficiency of the surgery. Analysis of the endpoint data is performed with SigmaStat® Statistical Software (SPSS Science, Inc., Chicago, Ill.).
- Referring now to
FIG. 5 , asystem 500 has asurgical instrument 520 operating in asurgical site 530 of a region of interest of a patient. Thesurgical instrument 520 has adistal end portion 522 and is operable by asurgeon 510 during a surgery. Thesurgical instrument 520 may be a commercially available surgical drill, a surgical scalpel, a suction device such as a surgical pump or tube, or other surgical instruments and any combination of them. Thesystem 500 further has an eye-trackingdevice 540 for intra-operatively tracking the visual line ofsight 570 of thesurgeon 510 and a location of thedistal end portion 522 of thesurgical instrument 520 in the region of interest of the patient, respectively. In one embodiment, the eye-trackingdevice 540 includes a head-hold device, such as EyeLink® II, (SR Research, Ltd., Osgoode, Canada). Other eye-tracking devices can also be employed to practice the current invention. Thesystem 500 also includes acontroller 550 that is operatively coupled with thesurgical instrument 520 and the eye-trackingdevice 540, respectively. Thecontroller 550, such as a computer, is configured to perform during the surgery the step of processing the intra-operatively tracked visual line ofsight 570 of thesurgeon 510 and the location of thedistal end portion 522 of thesurgical instrument 520 in the region of interest of the patient to determine an angle, α, between avisual path 580 connecting apredetermined point 542 of the eye-trackingdevice 540 and thedistal end portion 522 of thesurgical instrument 520 in the region of interest of the patient and the line ofsight 570 of thesurgeon 510. Thecontroller 550 is further configured to perform the step of generating a signal to disable thesurgical instrument 520 when the angle a is larger than a predetermined angle as a threshold. In one embodiment, thecontroller 550 is associated with a computer. - In one embodiment, the
system 500 has adisplay 560 communicatable with thecontroller 550 and the eye-trackingdevice 540 for displaying the tracked line ofsight 570 of thesurgeon 510 and the tracked location of thedistal end portion 522 of thesurgical instrument 520 in the region of interest of the patient, respectively. - The present invention, in one aspect, relates to a system for selectively disabling a surgical instrument operating in a surgical site of a region of interest of a patient, where the surgical instrument has a distal end portion and is operable by a surgeon during a surgery. In one embodiment, the system has a probe adapted for intra-operatively monitoring an electrophysiological condition of the patient in the region of interest, and a controller that is operatively coupled with the surgical instrument and the probe, respectively. The controller is further configured to perform during the surgery the steps of processing the intra-operatively monitored electrophysiological condition of the patient in the region of interest to identify a variation of the electrophysiological condition from an initial state of the patient in the region of interest, and generating a signal to disable the surgical instrument when the variation of the electrophysiological condition of the patient in the region of interest is greater than a predetermined value. The controller is associated with a computer.
- In one embodiment, the probe has at least one needle electrode placed in the region of interest of the patent adapted for intra-operatively recording an electromyogram of electrical activities of muscles of the region of interest of the patient. When a myogenic potential is recorded by the at least one needle electrode, the controller will generate a signal to disable the surgical instrument.
- The probe in another embodiment has a Doppler vascular probe adapted for intra-operatively monitoring a flow rate of blood vessels of the region of interest of the patient. When a variation of the flow rate of blood vessels of the region of interest of the patient is greater than a predetermined value, the controller will generate a signal to disable the surgical instrument.
- In yet another embodiment, the probe has a temperature-sensing device adapted for intra-operatively measuring a temperature of tissues of the region of interest of the patient. When a variation of the tissue temperature of the region of interest of the patient is greater than a predetermined value, the controller will generate a signal to disable the surgical instrument.
- In an alternative embodiment, the probe has an oxygenation detector adapted for intra-operatively detecting a venous oxygenation saturation and an arterial oxygenation saturation of the region of interest of the patient intra-operatively monitored by the oxygenation detector. When an alteration of the venous oxygenation saturation versus the arterial oxygenation saturation of the region of interest of the patient is identified, the controller will generate a signal to disable the surgical instrument.
- The probe, in one embodiment, has a tissue boundary detector, where the tissue boundary detector includes at least one of an ultrasound sensing device, an infrared radiation sensing device, an ultraviolet radiation sensing device, a fluorescent radiation sensing device, and a video frame device. The tissue boundary detector is adapted for intra-operatively identifying a tissue type of tissues at the distal end portion of the surgical instrument in the region of interest of the patient. When the tissue type of tissues at the distal end portion of the surgical instrument is changed, the controller will generate a signal to disable the surgical instrument.
- The present invention, among other things, discloses a system and method for selectively disabling a surgical instrument operating in a surgical site of a region of interest of a living subject, in response to a position feedback of the surgical instrument, an electrophysiological condition of the living subject in a region of interest, and a visual condition of sight of a surgeon who operates a surgery, respectively.
- The foregoing description of the exemplary embodiments of the invention has been presented only for the purposes of illustration and description and is not intended to be exhaustive or to limit the invention to the precise forms disclosed. Many modifications and variations are possible in light of the above teaching.
- The embodiments were chosen and described in order to explain the principles of the invention and their practical application so as to enable others skilled in the art to utilize the invention and various embodiments and with various modifications as are suited to the particular use contemplated. Alternative embodiments will become apparent to those skilled in the art to which the present invention pertains without departing from its spirit and scope. Accordingly, the scope of the present invention is defined by the appended claims rather than the foregoing description and the exemplary embodiments described therein.
- [1]. Gering DT, Nabavi A, Kikinis R, Hata N, O'Donnell L J, Grimson W E, Jolesz F A, Black P M, Wells W M 3rd, An integrated visualization system for surgical planning and guidance using image fusion and an open MR, J Magn Reson Imaging 2001 Jun; 13(6):967-75.
- [2]. Lunsford L D, Kondziolka D, Bissonette D J, Intra-operative imaging of the brain, Stereotact Funct Neurosurg 66(1-3):58-64, 1996.
- [3]. Spiegel E A, Wycis H T, and Marks M, Lee A. Stereotactic apparatus for operations on the human brain, Science 106:349-50, 1947.
- [4]. Galloway R L, Maciunas R J and Edwards C A. Interactive, Image-Guided Neurosurgery, IEEE Transactions on BME 39(12):1126-1231, 1992.
- [5]. Fried M P, Kleefield J, Gopal H, Reardon E, Ho B T, and Kuhn F A. Image-guided endoscopic surgery: results of accuracy and performance in a multi-center clinical study using an electromagnetic tracking system. Laryngoscope 107:594-601, 1997.
- [6]. Maurer C R Jr, Fitzpatrick J M, Wang M Y, Galloway R L Jr, Maciunas R J and Allen, G S, Registration of head volume images using implantable fiducial markers, IEEE Trans Med Imaging 16(4):447-62, 1997.
- [7]. West J B, Fitzpatrick J M, Toms S, Maurer, Jr, and Maciunas R J. Fiducial point placement and the accuracy of point-based, rigid-body registration. Neurosurgery 48:810-817, 2001.
- [8]. West J, Fitzpatrick T M, Wang M Y, Dawant B M, Maurer C R Jr, Kessler R M, Maciunas R J, Barillot C, Lemoine D, Collignon A, Maes F, Suetens P, Vandermeulen D, van den Elsen P A, Napel S, Sumanaweera T S, Harkness B, Hemler P F, Hill D L, Hawkes D J, Studholme C, Maintz T B, Viergever M A, Malandain G, Woods R P, et al. Comparison and evaluation of retrospective intermodality brain image registration techniques. J of Computer Assisted Tomography 21(4):554-66, 1997.
- [9]. Cawiano R R and Numa W A. Efficacy of computed radiographic image-guided endoscopic sinus surgery in residency training programs. Laryngoscope 110:1277-82, 2000.
- [10]. Weinberg J S. Lang F F. Sawaya R. Surgical management of brain metastases. Curr Oncol Rep 3(6):476-83, 2001.
- [11]. Wisoff J H, Boyett J M, Berger M S, Brant C, Li H, Yates A J, McGuire-Cullen P, Turski P A, Sutton L N, Allen J C, Packer R J, and Finlay J L. Current neurosurgical management and the impact of the extent of resection in the treatment of malignant gliomas of childhood: a report of the Children's Cancer Group trial no. CCG-945. J of Neurosurg 89(1):52-9, 1998.
- [12]. West J B, Fitzpatrick J M, Toms S, Maurer, Jr, and Maciunas R J. Fiducial point placement and the accuracy of point-based, rigid-body registration. Neurosurgery 48: 810-817, 2001.
Claims (17)
1-19. (canceled)
20. A system for selectively disabling a surgical instrument operating in a surgical site of a region of interest of a living subject, wherein the surgical instrument has a distal end portion and is operable by a surgeon during a surgery, comprising:
(a) a probe for intra-operatively monitoring a physiological condition of the living subject in the region of interest during the surgery; and
(b) a controller operatively coupled with the surgical instrument and the probe, respectively, and configured to perform during the surgery the steps of:
(i) determining a variation of the physiological condition of the living subject from an initial state of the living subject in the region of interest; and
(ii) generating a signal to disable the surgical instrument when the variation of the physiological condition is greater then a predetermined value, wherein the probe comprises at least one of a needle electrode placed in the region of interest of the living subject, a Doppler vascular probe, a temperature sensing device, an oxygenation detector, and a tissue boundary detector.
21. The system of claim 20 , further comprising at least one of a display and an audio device for visually and/or audibly displaying the intra-operatively monitored physiological condition of the living subject in the region of interest, respectively.
22. (canceled)
23. The system of claim 20 , wherein the physiological condition comprises an electromyogram of electrical activities of muscles of the region of interest of the living subject.
24. (canceled)
25. The system of claim 20 , wherein the physiological condition comprises a flow rate of blood vessels of the region of interest of the living subject.
26. (canceled)
27. The system of claim 20 , wherein the physiological condition comprises a temperature of tissues of the region of interest of the living subject.
28. (canceled)
29. The system of claim 20 , wherein the physiological condition comprises a venous oxygenation saturation and an arterial oxygenation saturation of the region of interest of the living subject.
30. (canceled)
31. The system of claim 20 , wherein the tissue boundary detector comprises at least one of an ultrasound sensing device, an infrared radiation sensing device, an ultraviolet radiation sensing device, a fluorescent radiation sensing device, and a video frame device.
32. The system of claim 31 , wherein the physiological condition comprises a tissue type identification of tissues at the distal end portion of the surgical instrument in the region of interest of the living subject.
33. The system of claim 32 , wherein the physiological condition comprises a volume of suction from the region of interest of the living subject.
34. A method for selectively disabling a surgical instrument operating in a surgical site of a region of interest of a living subject, wherein the surgical instrument has a distal end portion and is operable by a surgeon during a surgery, comprising the steps of:
(a) intra-operatively monitoring a physiological condition of the living subject in the region of interest during the surgery;
(b) determining a variation of the physiological condition of the living subject from an initial state of the living subject in the region of interest, during the surgery; and
(c) generating a signal to disable the surgical instrument when the variation of the physiological condition is greater than a predetermined value, wherein the physiological condition comprises at least one of an electromyogram of electrical activities of muscles of the region of interest of the living subject, a flow rate of blood vessels of the region of interest of the living subject, a temperature of tissues of the region of interest of the living subject, a venous oxygenation saturation and an arterial oxygenation saturation of the region of interest of the living subject, a tissue type identification of tissues at the distal end portion of the surgical instrument in the region of interest of the living subject, and a volume of suction from the region of interest of the living subject.
35-40. (canceled)
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US13/013,655 US20110118597A1 (en) | 2004-03-22 | 2011-01-25 | System and method for surgical instrument disablement via image-guided position feedback |
Applications Claiming Priority (3)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US55537704P | 2004-03-22 | 2004-03-22 | |
US11/079,898 US7899512B2 (en) | 2004-03-22 | 2005-03-14 | System and method for surgical instrument disablement via image-guided position feedback |
US13/013,655 US20110118597A1 (en) | 2004-03-22 | 2011-01-25 | System and method for surgical instrument disablement via image-guided position feedback |
Related Parent Applications (2)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US11/079,898 Continuation US7899512B2 (en) | 2004-03-22 | 2005-03-14 | System and method for surgical instrument disablement via image-guided position feedback |
US12/186,436 Continuation US7874098B2 (en) | 2008-08-05 | 2008-08-05 | Weighted rodent bait stations and related methods |
Related Child Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US13/533,747 Continuation US8516740B2 (en) | 2008-08-05 | 2012-06-26 | Weighted rodent bait stations and related methods |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
US20110118597A1 true US20110118597A1 (en) | 2011-05-19 |
Family
ID=35056711
Family Applications (2)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US11/079,898 Expired - Fee Related US7899512B2 (en) | 2004-03-22 | 2005-03-14 | System and method for surgical instrument disablement via image-guided position feedback |
US13/013,655 Abandoned US20110118597A1 (en) | 2004-03-22 | 2011-01-25 | System and method for surgical instrument disablement via image-guided position feedback |
Family Applications Before (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US11/079,898 Expired - Fee Related US7899512B2 (en) | 2004-03-22 | 2005-03-14 | System and method for surgical instrument disablement via image-guided position feedback |
Country Status (3)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (2) | US7899512B2 (en) |
EP (1) | EP1744670A2 (en) |
WO (1) | WO2005091978A2 (en) |
Cited By (12)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20090041301A1 (en) * | 2006-12-12 | 2009-02-12 | Prosurgics Limited | Frame of reference registration system and method |
US20120046536A1 (en) * | 2010-08-20 | 2012-02-23 | Manhattan Technologies, Llc | Surgical Instrument Navigation Systems and Methods |
US9208581B2 (en) | 2013-01-07 | 2015-12-08 | WexEbergy Innovations LLC | Method of determining measurements for designing a part utilizing a reference object and end user provided metadata |
US9230339B2 (en) | 2013-01-07 | 2016-01-05 | Wexenergy Innovations Llc | System and method of measuring distances related to an object |
US9265458B2 (en) | 2012-12-04 | 2016-02-23 | Sync-Think, Inc. | Application of smooth pursuit cognitive testing paradigms to clinical drug development |
US9380976B2 (en) | 2013-03-11 | 2016-07-05 | Sync-Think, Inc. | Optical neuroinformatics |
US9691163B2 (en) | 2013-01-07 | 2017-06-27 | Wexenergy Innovations Llc | System and method of measuring distances related to an object utilizing ancillary objects |
US10196850B2 (en) | 2013-01-07 | 2019-02-05 | WexEnergy LLC | Frameless supplemental window for fenestration |
US10501981B2 (en) | 2013-01-07 | 2019-12-10 | WexEnergy LLC | Frameless supplemental window for fenestration |
US10533364B2 (en) | 2017-05-30 | 2020-01-14 | WexEnergy LLC | Frameless supplemental window for fenestration |
US11026752B2 (en) | 2018-06-04 | 2021-06-08 | Medtronic Navigation, Inc. | System and method for performing and evaluating a procedure |
US11970900B2 (en) | 2020-12-16 | 2024-04-30 | WexEnergy LLC | Frameless supplemental window for fenestration |
Families Citing this family (65)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US7167760B2 (en) * | 2003-04-28 | 2007-01-23 | Vanderbilt University | Apparatus and methods of optimal placement of deep brain stimulator |
WO2006118915A2 (en) * | 2005-04-29 | 2006-11-09 | Vanderbilt University | System and methods of using image-guidance for providing an access to a cochlear of a living subject |
US7736382B2 (en) | 2005-09-09 | 2010-06-15 | Lockheed Martin Corporation | Apparatus for optical stimulation of nerves and other animal tissue |
US8475506B1 (en) | 2007-08-13 | 2013-07-02 | Lockheed Martin Corporation | VCSEL array stimulator apparatus and method for light stimulation of bodily tissues |
US8709078B1 (en) | 2011-08-03 | 2014-04-29 | Lockheed Martin Corporation | Ocular implant with substantially constant retinal spacing for transmission of nerve-stimulation light |
US8956396B1 (en) | 2005-10-24 | 2015-02-17 | Lockheed Martin Corporation | Eye-tracking visual prosthetic and method |
US8945197B1 (en) | 2005-10-24 | 2015-02-03 | Lockheed Martin Corporation | Sight-restoring visual prosthetic and method using infrared nerve-stimulation light |
US8929973B1 (en) | 2005-10-24 | 2015-01-06 | Lockheed Martin Corporation | Apparatus and method for characterizing optical sources used with human and animal tissues |
US8792978B2 (en) | 2010-05-28 | 2014-07-29 | Lockheed Martin Corporation | Laser-based nerve stimulators for, E.G., hearing restoration in cochlear prostheses and method |
US8012189B1 (en) | 2007-01-11 | 2011-09-06 | Lockheed Martin Corporation | Method and vestibular implant using optical stimulation of nerves |
US20080077200A1 (en) * | 2006-09-21 | 2008-03-27 | Aculight Corporation | Apparatus and method for stimulation of nerves and automated control of surgical instruments |
EP1820465B1 (en) * | 2006-02-21 | 2010-04-07 | BrainLAB AG | Universal image registration interface |
US8498699B2 (en) | 2008-10-03 | 2013-07-30 | Lockheed Martin Company | Method and nerve stimulator using simultaneous electrical and optical signals |
US8160696B2 (en) | 2008-10-03 | 2012-04-17 | Lockheed Martin Corporation | Nerve stimulator and method using simultaneous electrical and optical signals |
US8996131B1 (en) | 2006-09-28 | 2015-03-31 | Lockheed Martin Corporation | Apparatus and method for managing chronic pain with infrared light sources and heat |
US7883536B1 (en) | 2007-01-19 | 2011-02-08 | Lockheed Martin Corporation | Hybrid optical-electrical probes |
DE102007007915A1 (en) | 2007-02-14 | 2008-08-21 | Burger, Thorsten, Dr. | Cutting tool for preparing bone of patient for implanting artificial bone joint, has planning computer computing plan for positioning and orientation of guiding sections based on utilized implant and planed positioning of guiding sections |
US8608745B2 (en) * | 2007-03-26 | 2013-12-17 | DePuy Synthes Products, LLC | System, apparatus, and method for cutting bone during an orthopaedic surgical procedure |
EP2214577A4 (en) * | 2007-11-01 | 2012-12-19 | Univ Utah Res Found | Integrated surgical cutting system |
US9011508B2 (en) | 2007-11-30 | 2015-04-21 | Lockheed Martin Corporation | Broad wavelength profile to homogenize the absorption profile in optical stimulation of nerves |
US9044542B2 (en) | 2007-12-21 | 2015-06-02 | Carticept Medical, Inc. | Imaging-guided anesthesia injection systems and methods |
WO2009086182A1 (en) | 2007-12-21 | 2009-07-09 | Carticept Medical, Inc. | Articular injection system |
US8545440B2 (en) | 2007-12-21 | 2013-10-01 | Carticept Medical, Inc. | Injection system for delivering multiple fluids within the anatomy |
EP2108328B2 (en) * | 2008-04-09 | 2020-08-26 | Brainlab AG | Image-based control method for medicinal devices |
GB0809037D0 (en) * | 2008-05-19 | 2008-06-25 | Renishaw Plc | Video Probe |
ITRC20080006A1 (en) * | 2008-10-10 | 2010-04-11 | Antonino Zema | STEREOTASSIC SYSTEM WITH PRE-OPERATIVE TESTING NEURORADIOLOGICAL IMAGES EMPLOYEE |
DE102009010263B4 (en) * | 2009-02-24 | 2011-01-20 | Reiner Kunz | Method for navigating an endoscopic instrument during technical endoscopy and associated device |
WO2011091382A1 (en) | 2010-01-22 | 2011-07-28 | Precision Through Imaging, Llc | Dental implantation system and method |
IT1401669B1 (en) * | 2010-04-07 | 2013-08-02 | Sofar Spa | ROBOTIC SURGERY SYSTEM WITH PERFECT CONTROL. |
US9125624B2 (en) * | 2010-11-23 | 2015-09-08 | Claronav Inc. | Method and apparatus for automated registration and pose tracking |
US8911453B2 (en) | 2010-12-21 | 2014-12-16 | Restoration Robotics, Inc. | Methods and systems for directing movement of a tool in hair transplantation procedures |
US9498289B2 (en) | 2010-12-21 | 2016-11-22 | Restoration Robotics, Inc. | Methods and systems for directing movement of a tool in hair transplantation procedures |
EP2510878B1 (en) * | 2011-04-12 | 2014-02-26 | Marcus Abboud | Method for generating a radiological three dimensional digital volume tomography image of part of a patient's body |
US8938282B2 (en) | 2011-10-28 | 2015-01-20 | Navigate Surgical Technologies, Inc. | Surgical location monitoring system and method with automatic registration |
US8908918B2 (en) | 2012-11-08 | 2014-12-09 | Navigate Surgical Technologies, Inc. | System and method for determining the three-dimensional location and orientation of identification markers |
US11304777B2 (en) | 2011-10-28 | 2022-04-19 | Navigate Surgical Technologies, Inc | System and method for determining the three-dimensional location and orientation of identification markers |
US9554763B2 (en) | 2011-10-28 | 2017-01-31 | Navigate Surgical Technologies, Inc. | Soft body automatic registration and surgical monitoring system |
US9585721B2 (en) | 2011-10-28 | 2017-03-07 | Navigate Surgical Technologies, Inc. | System and method for real time tracking and modeling of surgical site |
US9198737B2 (en) | 2012-11-08 | 2015-12-01 | Navigate Surgical Technologies, Inc. | System and method for determining the three-dimensional location and orientation of identification markers |
US9566123B2 (en) | 2011-10-28 | 2017-02-14 | Navigate Surgical Technologies, Inc. | Surgical location monitoring system and method |
US20150066000A1 (en) * | 2012-03-06 | 2015-03-05 | Briteseed Llc | Surgical Tool With Integrated Sensor |
US11399898B2 (en) | 2012-03-06 | 2022-08-02 | Briteseed, Llc | User interface for a system used to determine tissue or artifact characteristics |
US9734543B2 (en) | 2012-03-14 | 2017-08-15 | Elwha Llc | Systems, devices, and method for determining treatment compliance including tracking, registering, etc. of medical staff, patients, instrumentation, events, etc. according to a treatment staging plan |
US9864839B2 (en) | 2012-03-14 | 2018-01-09 | El Wha Llc. | Systems, devices, and method for determining treatment compliance including tracking, registering, etc. of medical staff, patients, instrumentation, events, etc. according to a treatment staging plan |
US9008385B2 (en) * | 2012-03-14 | 2015-04-14 | Elwha Llc | Systems, devices, and method for determining treatment compliance including tracking, registering, etc. of medical staff, patients, instrumentation, events, etc. according to a treatment staging plan |
US20130261433A1 (en) * | 2012-03-28 | 2013-10-03 | Navident Technologies, Inc. | Haptic simulation and surgical location monitoring system and method |
CA2873856C (en) * | 2012-05-17 | 2020-03-24 | DePuy Synthes Products, LLC | Method of surgical planning |
US9336597B2 (en) * | 2012-11-08 | 2016-05-10 | Navigate Surgical Technologies, Inc. | System and method for determining the three-dimensional location and orienation of identification markers |
US9489738B2 (en) | 2013-04-26 | 2016-11-08 | Navigate Surgical Technologies, Inc. | System and method for tracking non-visible structure of a body with multi-element fiducial |
CA2919170A1 (en) | 2013-08-13 | 2015-02-19 | Navigate Surgical Technologies, Inc. | System and method for focusing imaging devices |
WO2015022338A1 (en) | 2013-08-13 | 2015-02-19 | Navigate Surgical Technologies, Inc. | Method for determining the location and orientation of a fiducial reference |
CN106659541B (en) | 2014-03-19 | 2019-08-16 | 直观外科手术操作公司 | Integrated eyeball stares medical device, the system and method that tracking is used for stereoscopic viewer |
KR102585602B1 (en) * | 2014-03-19 | 2023-10-10 | 인튜어티브 서지컬 오퍼레이션즈 인코포레이티드 | Medical devices, systems, and methods using eye gaze tracking |
US10251600B2 (en) | 2014-03-25 | 2019-04-09 | Briteseed, Llc | Vessel detector and method of detection |
WO2016134327A1 (en) | 2015-02-19 | 2016-08-25 | Briteseed Llc | System for determining vessel size using light absorption |
EP4000509B1 (en) | 2015-02-19 | 2023-08-30 | Briteseed, LLC | Surgical system for determining vessel size |
EP3359021B1 (en) | 2015-10-08 | 2019-07-31 | Briteseed, LLC | System for determining vessel size |
EP4026489A1 (en) | 2016-08-30 | 2022-07-13 | Briteseed, LLC | System and method for determining vessel size with angular distortion compensation |
ES2898312T3 (en) | 2017-09-05 | 2022-03-07 | Briteseed Llc | System and method used to determine tissue and/or artifact characteristics |
US11696777B2 (en) | 2017-12-22 | 2023-07-11 | Briteseed, Llc | Compact system used to determine tissue or artifact characteristics |
US11103256B2 (en) | 2018-05-21 | 2021-08-31 | Acclarent, Inc. | Shaver with blood vessel and nerve monitoring features |
US20220079709A1 (en) * | 2020-09-15 | 2022-03-17 | DDS Company, Inc. | Bone Stabilized Base Guide and Method for Attaching and Positioning a Robotic Intra-Oral Surgical Device |
TW202203861A (en) | 2020-03-30 | 2022-02-01 | 美商尼奧西斯股份有限公司 | Splint device for guided surgical robot |
TW202203862A (en) | 2020-03-30 | 2022-02-01 | 美商尼奧西斯股份有限公司 | Splint device for guided surgical robot |
WO2023287862A1 (en) * | 2021-07-13 | 2023-01-19 | Proprio, Inc. | Methods and systems for displaying preoperative and intraoperative image data of a scene |
Citations (36)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US4742815A (en) * | 1986-01-02 | 1988-05-10 | Ninan Champil A | Computer monitoring of endoscope |
US4836778A (en) * | 1987-05-26 | 1989-06-06 | Vexcel Corporation | Mandibular motion monitoring system |
US4844063A (en) * | 1986-09-27 | 1989-07-04 | Clark Ronald D | Surgical diathermy apparatus |
US5078140A (en) * | 1986-05-08 | 1992-01-07 | Kwoh Yik S | Imaging device - aided robotic stereotaxis system |
US5207223A (en) * | 1990-10-19 | 1993-05-04 | Accuray, Inc. | Apparatus for and method of performing stereotaxic surgery |
US5474548A (en) * | 1993-07-14 | 1995-12-12 | Knopp; Carl F. | Method of establishing a unique machine independent reference frame for the eye |
US5483961A (en) * | 1993-03-19 | 1996-01-16 | Kelly; Patrick J. | Magnetic field digitizer for stereotactic surgery |
US5617857A (en) * | 1995-06-06 | 1997-04-08 | Image Guided Technologies, Inc. | Imaging system having interactive medical instruments and methods |
US5732703A (en) * | 1992-11-30 | 1998-03-31 | The Cleveland Clinic Foundation | Stereotaxy wand and tool guide |
US5776064A (en) * | 1992-11-30 | 1998-07-07 | The Cleveland Clinic Foundation | Frameless stereotaxy system for indicating the position and axis of a surgical probe |
US5799055A (en) * | 1996-05-15 | 1998-08-25 | Northwestern University | Apparatus and method for planning a stereotactic surgical procedure using coordinated fluoroscopy |
US5871445A (en) * | 1993-04-26 | 1999-02-16 | St. Louis University | System for indicating the position of a surgical probe within a head on an image of the head |
US5879306A (en) * | 1996-06-13 | 1999-03-09 | Stryker Corporation | Infrared system for visualizing body members |
US6019724A (en) * | 1995-02-22 | 2000-02-01 | Gronningsaeter; Aage | Method for ultrasound guidance during clinical procedures |
US6109270A (en) * | 1997-02-04 | 2000-08-29 | The United States Of America As Represented By The Administrator Of The National Aeronautics And Space Administration | Multimodality instrument for tissue characterization |
US6135999A (en) * | 1997-02-12 | 2000-10-24 | Oratec Internationals, Inc. | Concave probe for arthroscopic surgery |
US6139545A (en) * | 1998-09-09 | 2000-10-31 | Vidaderm | Systems and methods for ablating discrete motor nerve regions |
US6201984B1 (en) * | 1991-06-13 | 2001-03-13 | International Business Machines Corporation | System and method for augmentation of endoscopic surgery |
US6214018B1 (en) * | 1998-11-04 | 2001-04-10 | Trex Medical Corporation | Method and apparatus for removing tissue from a region of interest using stereotactic radiographic guidance |
US6236875B1 (en) * | 1994-10-07 | 2001-05-22 | Surgical Navigation Technologies | Surgical navigation systems including reference and localization frames |
US20020032453A1 (en) * | 1995-01-31 | 2002-03-14 | Cosman Eric R. | Repositioner for head, neck, and body |
US20020065461A1 (en) * | 1991-01-28 | 2002-05-30 | Cosman Eric R. | Surgical positioning system |
US20020068015A1 (en) * | 2000-09-26 | 2002-06-06 | Hans-Dietrich Polaschegg | Apparatus and method for control of ultrafiltration in extracorporeal treatment of blood |
US20020099254A1 (en) * | 2001-01-23 | 2002-07-25 | Movahed M. Reza | Method and apparatus to remove substances from vessels of the heart and other parts of the body to minimize or aviod renal or other harm or dysfunction |
US20020120188A1 (en) * | 2000-12-21 | 2002-08-29 | Brock David L. | Medical mapping system |
US20040034283A1 (en) * | 2002-03-06 | 2004-02-19 | Quaid Arthur E. | System and method for interactive haptic positioning of a medical device |
US20040049179A1 (en) * | 2001-04-26 | 2004-03-11 | Francischelli David E. | Ablation system |
US6741883B2 (en) * | 2002-02-28 | 2004-05-25 | Houston Stereotactic Concepts, Inc. | Audible feedback from positional guidance systems |
US20040106916A1 (en) * | 2002-03-06 | 2004-06-03 | Z-Kat, Inc. | Guidance system and method for surgical procedures with improved feedback |
US6757582B2 (en) * | 2002-05-03 | 2004-06-29 | Carnegie Mellon University | Methods and systems to control a shaping tool |
US6778850B1 (en) * | 1999-03-16 | 2004-08-17 | Accuray, Inc. | Frameless radiosurgery treatment system and method |
US6990368B2 (en) * | 2002-04-04 | 2006-01-24 | Surgical Navigation Technologies, Inc. | Method and apparatus for virtual digital subtraction angiography |
US7228165B1 (en) * | 2000-06-26 | 2007-06-05 | Boston Scientific Scimed, Inc. | Apparatus and method for performing a tissue resection procedure |
US7313430B2 (en) * | 2003-08-28 | 2007-12-25 | Medtronic Navigation, Inc. | Method and apparatus for performing stereotactic surgery |
US7542791B2 (en) * | 2003-01-30 | 2009-06-02 | Medtronic Navigation, Inc. | Method and apparatus for preplanning a surgical procedure |
US7567834B2 (en) * | 2004-05-03 | 2009-07-28 | Medtronic Navigation, Inc. | Method and apparatus for implantation between two vertebral bodies |
Family Cites Families (2)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
DE10117403C2 (en) | 2001-04-06 | 2003-10-02 | Lb Medical Gmbh | Process and device system for material removal or material processing |
US7840253B2 (en) * | 2003-10-17 | 2010-11-23 | Medtronic Navigation, Inc. | Method and apparatus for surgical navigation |
-
2005
- 2005-03-14 WO PCT/US2005/008308 patent/WO2005091978A2/en active Application Filing
- 2005-03-14 US US11/079,898 patent/US7899512B2/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
- 2005-03-14 EP EP05732616A patent/EP1744670A2/en not_active Withdrawn
-
2011
- 2011-01-25 US US13/013,655 patent/US20110118597A1/en not_active Abandoned
Patent Citations (42)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US4742815A (en) * | 1986-01-02 | 1988-05-10 | Ninan Champil A | Computer monitoring of endoscope |
US5078140A (en) * | 1986-05-08 | 1992-01-07 | Kwoh Yik S | Imaging device - aided robotic stereotaxis system |
US4844063A (en) * | 1986-09-27 | 1989-07-04 | Clark Ronald D | Surgical diathermy apparatus |
US4836778A (en) * | 1987-05-26 | 1989-06-06 | Vexcel Corporation | Mandibular motion monitoring system |
US5207223A (en) * | 1990-10-19 | 1993-05-04 | Accuray, Inc. | Apparatus for and method of performing stereotaxic surgery |
US6405072B1 (en) * | 1991-01-28 | 2002-06-11 | Sherwood Services Ag | Apparatus and method for determining a location of an anatomical target with reference to a medical apparatus |
US20020065461A1 (en) * | 1991-01-28 | 2002-05-30 | Cosman Eric R. | Surgical positioning system |
US6201984B1 (en) * | 1991-06-13 | 2001-03-13 | International Business Machines Corporation | System and method for augmentation of endoscopic surgery |
US5732703A (en) * | 1992-11-30 | 1998-03-31 | The Cleveland Clinic Foundation | Stereotaxy wand and tool guide |
US5776064A (en) * | 1992-11-30 | 1998-07-07 | The Cleveland Clinic Foundation | Frameless stereotaxy system for indicating the position and axis of a surgical probe |
US5483961A (en) * | 1993-03-19 | 1996-01-16 | Kelly; Patrick J. | Magnetic field digitizer for stereotactic surgery |
US5871445A (en) * | 1993-04-26 | 1999-02-16 | St. Louis University | System for indicating the position of a surgical probe within a head on an image of the head |
US5474548A (en) * | 1993-07-14 | 1995-12-12 | Knopp; Carl F. | Method of establishing a unique machine independent reference frame for the eye |
US6236875B1 (en) * | 1994-10-07 | 2001-05-22 | Surgical Navigation Technologies | Surgical navigation systems including reference and localization frames |
US20020032453A1 (en) * | 1995-01-31 | 2002-03-14 | Cosman Eric R. | Repositioner for head, neck, and body |
US6019724A (en) * | 1995-02-22 | 2000-02-01 | Gronningsaeter; Aage | Method for ultrasound guidance during clinical procedures |
US5617857A (en) * | 1995-06-06 | 1997-04-08 | Image Guided Technologies, Inc. | Imaging system having interactive medical instruments and methods |
US5799055A (en) * | 1996-05-15 | 1998-08-25 | Northwestern University | Apparatus and method for planning a stereotactic surgical procedure using coordinated fluoroscopy |
US5879306A (en) * | 1996-06-13 | 1999-03-09 | Stryker Corporation | Infrared system for visualizing body members |
US6109270A (en) * | 1997-02-04 | 2000-08-29 | The United States Of America As Represented By The Administrator Of The National Aeronautics And Space Administration | Multimodality instrument for tissue characterization |
US6391028B1 (en) * | 1997-02-12 | 2002-05-21 | Oratec Interventions, Inc. | Probe with distally orientated concave curve for arthroscopic surgery |
US6135999A (en) * | 1997-02-12 | 2000-10-24 | Oratec Internationals, Inc. | Concave probe for arthroscopic surgery |
US6139545A (en) * | 1998-09-09 | 2000-10-31 | Vidaderm | Systems and methods for ablating discrete motor nerve regions |
US6214018B1 (en) * | 1998-11-04 | 2001-04-10 | Trex Medical Corporation | Method and apparatus for removing tissue from a region of interest using stereotactic radiographic guidance |
US6778850B1 (en) * | 1999-03-16 | 2004-08-17 | Accuray, Inc. | Frameless radiosurgery treatment system and method |
US7228165B1 (en) * | 2000-06-26 | 2007-06-05 | Boston Scientific Scimed, Inc. | Apparatus and method for performing a tissue resection procedure |
US20020068015A1 (en) * | 2000-09-26 | 2002-06-06 | Hans-Dietrich Polaschegg | Apparatus and method for control of ultrafiltration in extracorporeal treatment of blood |
US20020120188A1 (en) * | 2000-12-21 | 2002-08-29 | Brock David L. | Medical mapping system |
US6810281B2 (en) * | 2000-12-21 | 2004-10-26 | Endovia Medical, Inc. | Medical mapping system |
US20020099254A1 (en) * | 2001-01-23 | 2002-07-25 | Movahed M. Reza | Method and apparatus to remove substances from vessels of the heart and other parts of the body to minimize or aviod renal or other harm or dysfunction |
US20040049179A1 (en) * | 2001-04-26 | 2004-03-11 | Francischelli David E. | Ablation system |
US6741883B2 (en) * | 2002-02-28 | 2004-05-25 | Houston Stereotactic Concepts, Inc. | Audible feedback from positional guidance systems |
US20040106916A1 (en) * | 2002-03-06 | 2004-06-03 | Z-Kat, Inc. | Guidance system and method for surgical procedures with improved feedback |
US20040034302A1 (en) * | 2002-03-06 | 2004-02-19 | Abovitz Rony A. | System and method for intra-operative haptic planning of a medical procedure |
US7206627B2 (en) * | 2002-03-06 | 2007-04-17 | Z-Kat, Inc. | System and method for intra-operative haptic planning of a medical procedure |
US7206626B2 (en) * | 2002-03-06 | 2007-04-17 | Z-Kat, Inc. | System and method for haptic sculpting of physical objects |
US20040034283A1 (en) * | 2002-03-06 | 2004-02-19 | Quaid Arthur E. | System and method for interactive haptic positioning of a medical device |
US6990368B2 (en) * | 2002-04-04 | 2006-01-24 | Surgical Navigation Technologies, Inc. | Method and apparatus for virtual digital subtraction angiography |
US6757582B2 (en) * | 2002-05-03 | 2004-06-29 | Carnegie Mellon University | Methods and systems to control a shaping tool |
US7542791B2 (en) * | 2003-01-30 | 2009-06-02 | Medtronic Navigation, Inc. | Method and apparatus for preplanning a surgical procedure |
US7313430B2 (en) * | 2003-08-28 | 2007-12-25 | Medtronic Navigation, Inc. | Method and apparatus for performing stereotactic surgery |
US7567834B2 (en) * | 2004-05-03 | 2009-07-28 | Medtronic Navigation, Inc. | Method and apparatus for implantation between two vertebral bodies |
Cited By (13)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20090041301A1 (en) * | 2006-12-12 | 2009-02-12 | Prosurgics Limited | Frame of reference registration system and method |
US20120046536A1 (en) * | 2010-08-20 | 2012-02-23 | Manhattan Technologies, Llc | Surgical Instrument Navigation Systems and Methods |
US9265458B2 (en) | 2012-12-04 | 2016-02-23 | Sync-Think, Inc. | Application of smooth pursuit cognitive testing paradigms to clinical drug development |
US9691163B2 (en) | 2013-01-07 | 2017-06-27 | Wexenergy Innovations Llc | System and method of measuring distances related to an object utilizing ancillary objects |
US9230339B2 (en) | 2013-01-07 | 2016-01-05 | Wexenergy Innovations Llc | System and method of measuring distances related to an object |
US9208581B2 (en) | 2013-01-07 | 2015-12-08 | WexEbergy Innovations LLC | Method of determining measurements for designing a part utilizing a reference object and end user provided metadata |
US10196850B2 (en) | 2013-01-07 | 2019-02-05 | WexEnergy LLC | Frameless supplemental window for fenestration |
US10346999B2 (en) | 2013-01-07 | 2019-07-09 | Wexenergy Innovations Llc | System and method of measuring distances related to an object utilizing ancillary objects |
US10501981B2 (en) | 2013-01-07 | 2019-12-10 | WexEnergy LLC | Frameless supplemental window for fenestration |
US9380976B2 (en) | 2013-03-11 | 2016-07-05 | Sync-Think, Inc. | Optical neuroinformatics |
US10533364B2 (en) | 2017-05-30 | 2020-01-14 | WexEnergy LLC | Frameless supplemental window for fenestration |
US11026752B2 (en) | 2018-06-04 | 2021-06-08 | Medtronic Navigation, Inc. | System and method for performing and evaluating a procedure |
US11970900B2 (en) | 2020-12-16 | 2024-04-30 | WexEnergy LLC | Frameless supplemental window for fenestration |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
WO2005091978A3 (en) | 2006-12-07 |
US7899512B2 (en) | 2011-03-01 |
EP1744670A2 (en) | 2007-01-24 |
US20050228256A1 (en) | 2005-10-13 |
WO2005091978A2 (en) | 2005-10-06 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US7899512B2 (en) | System and method for surgical instrument disablement via image-guided position feedback | |
US8380288B2 (en) | System and methods of using image-guidance for providing an access to a cochlear of a living subject | |
Eggers et al. | Image-to-patient registration techniques in head surgery | |
Widmann et al. | Errors and error management in image-guided craniomaxillofacial surgery | |
Birkfellner et al. | In‐vitro assessment of a registration protocol for image guided implant dentistry | |
Haberland et al. | Neuronavigation in surgery of intracranial and spinal tumors | |
US20140031668A1 (en) | Surgical and Medical Instrument Tracking Using a Depth-Sensing Device | |
Matula et al. | Intraoperative computed tomography guided neuronavigation: concepts, efficiency, and work flow | |
Hong et al. | Medical navigation system for otologic surgery based on hybrid registration and virtual intraoperative computed tomography | |
Schramm et al. | Navigational surgery of the facial skeleton | |
Zaaroor et al. | Novel magnetic technology for intraoperative intracranial frameless navigation: in vivo and in vitro results | |
Gerbino et al. | Management of needle breakage using intraoperative navigation following inferior alveolar nerve block | |
WO2012033739A2 (en) | Surgical and medical instrument tracking using a depth-sensing device | |
Widmann et al. | Target registration and target positioning errors in computer‐assisted neurosurgery: proposal for a standardized reporting of error assessment | |
Bale et al. | Computer-assisted neurosurgery by using a noninvasive vacuum-affixed dental cast that acts as a reference base: another step toward a unified approach in the treatment of brain tumors | |
Eggers et al. | Template-based registration for image-guided maxillofacial surgery | |
CN109700531B (en) | Individual mandible navigation registration guide plate and registration method thereof | |
Reittner et al. | Multislice CT-image-guided endoscopic sinus surgery using an electromagnetic tracking system | |
Schultes et al. | Removal of osteosynthesis material by minimally invasive surgery based on 3-dimensional computed tomography–guided navigation | |
Vijayalakshmi | Image-guided surgery through internet of things | |
Schipper et al. | Navigation as a tool to visualize bone-covered hidden structures in transfrontal approaches | |
Westermann et al. | Online head motion tracking applied to the patient registration problem | |
Hoffmann et al. | Image-guided navigation for minimal invasive approaches in craniomaxillofacial surgery | |
RU2130759C1 (en) | Method for directing stereotactic instrument to a target point | |
Tessman | Exploring frameless stereotactic image guided surgery |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
STCB | Information on status: application discontinuation |
Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH (NIH), U.S. DEPT. OF Free format text: CONFIRMATORY LICENSE;ASSIGNOR:VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY;REEL/FRAME:040514/0940 Effective date: 20110127 |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH - DIRECTOR DEITR, MA Free format text: CONFIRMATORY LICENSE;ASSIGNOR:VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY;REEL/FRAME:050846/0004 Effective date: 20191014 |